{"meta":{"query_hash":"985836f594cd","filters":{"topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies"},"cohort_total":2130,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":2130,"exported":2130,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/985836f594cd","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Judicial+and+Constitutional+Studies"},"results":[{"id":"W10057505","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1284","title":"Appointment of Justice Marshall Rothstein to the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Insider; Economic Justice; Political science","score_opus":0.017357307053110727,"score_gpt":0.2497616599389269,"score_spread":0.23240435288581618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W10057505","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023239933,0.029346114,0.0014943505,0.72470605,0.01719064,0.00018743202,0.0009822014,0.0001734991,0.20267981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27354681,0.010258617,0.0020877956,0.17884189,0.002914664,0.00009336981,0.00024718145,0.00021441262,0.53179526],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952064,0.00039308032,0.00009180107,0.0007551606,0.0016743668,0.0018791636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967026,0.00066311576,0.00008499546,0.000083788,0.0017582848,0.0007072523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027688476,0.000429417,0.0008114255,0.0014387011,0.03544207,0.00753229,0.002313521,0.008065436,0.008613272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010277411,0.000675471,0.00059325394,0.001834313,0.0057157227,0.0016772219,0.0016546322,0.012830016,0.00093833194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038986505,0.00001394801,0.0013984658,0.000042849428,0.000018252595,0.00061003596,0.002455947,0.00020799419,0.0003516259,0.18748885,0.79498893,0.012384163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012003202,0.000010227031,0.003015381,0.00013765106,0.00002925711,0.000093156785,0.003176275,0.00024654504,0.00058616686,0.0076611764,0.9849439,0.00008811281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97478414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99129254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08158789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08158789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12273594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59196436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1022707983","doi":"","title":"The Court's Mulligan: a commennt on Canada (attorney general) v. Hislop","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Dissent; Constitution; Context (archaeology); Political science; Majority opinion; Economic Justice; Interpretation (philosophy); Mulligan; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027721448784000135,"score_gpt":0.25956184668630367,"score_spread":0.23184039790230354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1022707983","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060125362,0.016903006,0.0020444319,0.44407466,0.0036092428,0.00021468867,0.0024311214,0.00017437045,0.47042307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46689624,0.004078596,0.0019913265,0.1906732,0.00055143057,0.00008863605,0.00043834845,0.00010053162,0.33518177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99639255,0.00034492475,0.000052325635,0.00035785028,0.0014214639,0.001430903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981857,0.0005060461,0.000041819418,0.00006281192,0.00080220803,0.00040139887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001780227,0.0004776007,0.00045217984,0.0008775841,0.024891926,0.007596718,0.0025007662,0.010962493,0.0072294846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049806195,0.00053020194,0.0006919067,0.001308817,0.005428606,0.0017915231,0.001551782,0.0097473925,0.00071331527],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008324585,0.000042033498,0.003088583,0.00007292477,0.000036760786,0.0010111325,0.006196563,0.00023149102,0.0009756789,0.48996565,0.48236987,0.015926015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008247995,0.000056682933,0.01604334,0.00034259283,0.00009140274,0.00024163429,0.009730482,0.0009491206,0.0016539121,0.044870954,0.9257496,0.00018789391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9748471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9930616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037013773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037013773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.065783344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26855493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W108443798","doi":"10.21991/c9jd4k","title":"THE SUPREME COURT ENTRENCHES PARLIAMENTARY PRIVILEGE OUT OF THE CHARTER'S REACH: DONOHOE V. CBC","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Privilege (computing); Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04460770952854883,"score_gpt":0.2600284529136868,"score_spread":0.21542074338513797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W108443798","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09940754,0.005191974,0.001651358,0.18308675,0.0016246951,0.00006160464,0.00024472136,0.0000426384,0.7086886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88161147,0.0011598308,0.0005408394,0.07786014,0.0005954064,0.000089653375,0.000057521043,0.000037895505,0.03804738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98458004,0.0046268706,0.0005125524,0.001574823,0.0046122703,0.0040935096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985727,0.010335498,0.00074235286,0.00054826174,0.0015126244,0.0011342448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011140771,0.00030954392,0.0011094476,0.0019725675,0.01639245,0.012391444,0.0016669505,0.016313126,0.0045647854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037589405,0.00064914796,0.0006887593,0.001754734,0.015381286,0.0040225545,0.0053101773,0.015567737,0.0005691883],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055099914,0.000024460724,0.000955736,0.00003536801,0.000012378784,0.00031263242,0.004719301,0.0000878833,0.00044616143,0.9565718,0.032100283,0.004678801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026674184,0.00014834304,0.014516309,0.0009425468,0.00018811265,0.00039500315,0.009405436,0.00063800847,0.0029009543,0.3338268,0.6365345,0.00023717023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23052785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28482318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7694721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012483961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026271265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45837206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W10959497","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1470703","title":"A Content Analysis of Supreme Court of Canada Judgments: Preliminary Observations","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ontario Institute of Technology; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Content (measure theory); Content analysis; Political science; Psychology; Mathematics; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.04380172547238111,"score_gpt":0.2737753492614412,"score_spread":0.22997362378906008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W10959497","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92938566,0.0002913347,0.0022765647,0.0011068416,0.000045393313,0.00064833596,0.003990387,0.00006309466,0.062192462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98798776,0.00023041938,0.002980414,0.00027326652,0.000038820617,0.00042777436,0.002249222,0.00009780308,0.005714468],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9850153,0.003460897,0.00071599445,0.0008878334,0.008474749,0.0014451642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8534485,0.06862054,0.008857413,0.003421383,0.06330992,0.0023421857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008792622,0.00026495,0.00046869428,0.013682738,0.009721872,0.005153241,0.0013053699,0.0008615218,0.006312007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.118633315,0.0003469265,0.00039980587,0.023005707,0.0035852885,0.002695034,0.0020948658,0.0011564966,0.0006892906],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001734147,0.0008333841,0.47841948,0.0008232395,0.00018872907,0.0010054627,0.29768574,0.0011851122,0.010957233,0.06253539,0.028166419,0.11646571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055007433,0.00011720279,0.821319,0.00029911517,0.00015704254,0.00017102415,0.12795451,0.0027115636,0.0047890088,0.008374636,0.03396091,0.000090973976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6580331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7683768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34196693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026754547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030579101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6879617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W112197869","doi":"10.21991/c9xt0m","title":"THOUGHTS ON CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS RECOGNIZING AN INHERENT ABORIGINAL RIGHT TO SELF-GOVERNMENT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Constitutional right; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Psychology; Sociology; Linguistics; Constitution; Philosophy","score_opus":0.044421854086359736,"score_gpt":0.30768330344413425,"score_spread":0.2632614493577745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W112197869","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028815785,0.0067090006,0.008966455,0.3159602,0.010006521,0.00014463013,0.00013522692,0.000071517745,0.6291906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63638777,0.004852351,0.009859935,0.18334624,0.010585811,0.00045609358,0.000088618144,0.00018145046,0.15424177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9811013,0.0066834274,0.001065756,0.0023833609,0.004637877,0.0041283946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98713696,0.00886668,0.0006406833,0.0010863182,0.0018186646,0.00045074924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021909736,0.00064648385,0.0012570986,0.0022506681,0.019877646,0.015301533,0.0052496376,0.031557474,0.0062177326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025022099,0.0012955411,0.0019925465,0.0018763446,0.057823583,0.011585508,0.0060820975,0.04662589,0.0011048918],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000412153,0.0000051401785,0.000014596605,0.000015351476,0.0000028973045,0.000077594515,0.0044555,0.0000385089,0.00009526991,0.99109846,0.0036357238,0.0005567354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005213186,0.00003227761,0.00045957076,0.00034639458,0.000046826342,0.00018969177,0.008842312,0.00020088343,0.00080009503,0.7315956,0.25733933,0.00009496268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.066517964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07402945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9863372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01366281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011080936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13226151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W114679256","doi":"10.18261/issn1891-814x-2012-03-07","title":"Economic and Social Rights Across Time, Regions, and Legal Traditions: A Preliminary Analysis of the TIESR Dataset","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nordic Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Social rights; Political science; Law; International human rights law; Reservation of rights; Norm (philosophy); Human rights; Fundamental rights; Right to property","score_opus":0.02783690283989469,"score_gpt":0.3142922942626533,"score_spread":0.2864553914227586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W114679256","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22786166,0.00070786924,0.0009772774,0.0010224867,0.000069954796,0.00016471838,0.7605691,0.00015735386,0.008469594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12221733,0.00025430715,0.003029753,0.00016784089,0.000053002896,0.0003517514,0.8687168,0.00007909181,0.005130165],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99723226,0.0007876464,0.00030324265,0.00048031873,0.0007809045,0.00041555736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99324775,0.0029151423,0.0013232286,0.0010120063,0.0009821136,0.0005196258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029523,0.0004261051,0.0008717095,0.0038437853,0.0012076279,0.001755581,0.0013727439,0.0013202953,0.011331498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009917555,0.00024252862,0.00076661963,0.0056191254,0.0004412151,0.0009272905,0.0020782156,0.0011010477,0.005137805],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014835626,0.0010501508,0.49307615,0.0016439278,0.00065287866,0.0011841242,0.0035807379,0.0067253294,0.0023300906,0.011129875,0.43638134,0.040761884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002867479,0.00013119221,0.61515015,0.0004720895,0.000117041396,0.00046729177,0.0051884037,0.004777838,0.0009970013,0.0013589314,0.37098372,0.00006951504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030537218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059520476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030537218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010702881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013091237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060718954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W11544044","doi":"10.1016/s0956-5663(01)00164-6","title":"Canadian Courts: Law, Politics, And Process","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law; Political science; Process (computing); Computer science","score_opus":0.016112874088657646,"score_gpt":0.27623829300786246,"score_spread":0.2601254189192048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W11544044","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021733397,0.02606636,0.0014348743,0.029899286,0.00074721244,0.000033871205,0.00036267992,0.000056789086,0.9392255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18931201,0.035896268,0.0023695938,0.006841013,0.0009462591,0.00006202279,0.000377425,0.00009323394,0.76410216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819475,0.00018283252,0.00003453101,0.00018312532,0.0010998371,0.00030490645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892104,0.00024309209,0.00004391085,0.000078488185,0.00053373136,0.00017974986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008867101,0.00051567494,0.0003528385,0.0019551534,0.009887386,0.0086662425,0.0010772762,0.0028535924,0.028104853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029419146,0.00034434284,0.00019215584,0.0050566867,0.011584781,0.0030706688,0.0016148431,0.0028569675,0.0024398377],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020636844,0.000003100656,0.00014644353,0.000028798268,0.000001147304,0.000037085632,0.00088704156,0.00015001645,0.000031208157,0.8773865,0.10315462,0.01817184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002285034,0.0000024703854,0.00088915654,0.00010162266,0.0000024641831,0.000041053863,0.0008341386,0.000193827,0.000038546237,0.07656812,0.9213156,0.000010692517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90129775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9485932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9279792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.072020814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0722157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1166798639","doi":"","title":"« A Supreme Court’s Place in the Constitutional Order: Contrasting Recent Experiences in Canada and the United Kingdom »","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Certiorari; Constitution; Constitutional law; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.022598856552028826,"score_gpt":0.25904470877901437,"score_spread":0.23644585222698555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1166798639","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54689264,0.0629729,0.00080181425,0.18309787,0.001270917,0.00007149986,0.00060818304,0.00004621937,0.20423803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9730427,0.007396928,0.00019557757,0.009707004,0.00006799964,0.000015102566,0.00008715022,0.000037954313,0.009449558],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98701733,0.0029125812,0.00042505545,0.0010289527,0.00328337,0.0053326357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9811903,0.0066689183,0.00097013963,0.00050994015,0.0066085667,0.004052168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007494004,0.00033852234,0.00078017113,0.0041775717,0.055958405,0.020511964,0.0030601025,0.0063793766,0.005881975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021701021,0.0006626595,0.00058250094,0.009624444,0.030807901,0.0054951347,0.005610172,0.009127638,0.00034640005],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017224698,0.0000552156,0.013494177,0.00035432997,0.000067701454,0.0028597917,0.6177342,0.0004758895,0.0005075441,0.28252855,0.04910397,0.032646414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026391537,0.000028486975,0.036836255,0.0013056196,0.000060933722,0.00050305185,0.45637473,0.00027501138,0.00031074937,0.0052087624,0.4988324,0.00023770989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9956447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9977329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26135492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.26135492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19523123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8567236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1198639546","doi":"","title":"Whither Justice: The Common Problematic of Five Models of ‘Access to Justice'","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Criminology; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.07199145081357904,"score_gpt":0.34382518410889723,"score_spread":0.2718337332953182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1198639546","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036733713,0.018480817,0.13154767,0.27836698,0.0018981199,0.00012453346,0.00017814673,0.00023565006,0.5324344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95525795,0.0038594045,0.0142479325,0.013027248,0.0013519848,0.00026873316,0.00006724982,0.000109867,0.011809699],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.977426,0.01298865,0.0007773608,0.0018332818,0.004838318,0.0021363862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98604125,0.008049319,0.0009362932,0.002089395,0.0017206697,0.0011631945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016416516,0.00093706767,0.0013681087,0.0050712815,0.012482744,0.022355333,0.003687345,0.010242457,0.0051822094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020861963,0.000536862,0.001179397,0.0042342367,0.09067743,0.031108081,0.013370206,0.01240603,0.0006415968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019639288,0.0000025272334,0.000025579711,0.0000065415493,0.0000011726651,0.000006162259,0.0013841179,0.000028902057,0.0000038061048,0.9972063,0.00043776236,0.0008952906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043470427,0.0000065260256,0.000061542094,0.000055319862,0.000002795562,0.0000209784,0.00155473,0.00026823682,0.000015877924,0.9865117,0.011492042,0.0000059559025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009762012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008819137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022355333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011156963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009437872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08681989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W120683721","doi":"","title":"Guarding the Guardians? Towards an Independent, Accountable and Diverse Senior Judiciary","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business","score_opus":0.02589877427652125,"score_gpt":0.24055741508862366,"score_spread":0.2146586408121024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W120683721","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11859147,0.013957384,0.023963131,0.63683075,0.0043839454,0.00007712944,0.000054774813,0.0001815825,0.2019598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9045119,0.0023327887,0.006918499,0.045773625,0.0011240487,0.00003350082,0.000037999867,0.00010880123,0.039158817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896868,0.004097975,0.0003587827,0.0015291459,0.0019249318,0.0024023505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913078,0.0017155627,0.0006295594,0.00074818585,0.00092007674,0.0046788743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012824563,0.00042531372,0.0005715501,0.0010734106,0.010024752,0.0155611755,0.0018547968,0.006240833,0.0041617397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011275208,0.00055818673,0.00037942344,0.0006980078,0.0274904,0.009944096,0.010199822,0.014451357,0.0023035666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040491384,0.00006384609,0.0024172054,0.000057680354,0.000014120129,0.00028337218,0.029970057,0.00025145352,0.00086730253,0.8886567,0.04156113,0.03581666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004560936,0.00007506013,0.0034272412,0.00054165063,0.000015390568,0.00040542873,0.020184705,0.00088486326,0.00065737136,0.5076325,0.46605256,0.000077642835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018970693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022564137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018970693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008314347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015777733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06782359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W122286134","doi":"10.29173/alr176","title":"Continuing Questions in Canadian Political Finance Law: Third Parties and Small Political Parties","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Appeal; Harm; Law; Apprehension; Political science; Campaign finance","score_opus":0.024430265972964566,"score_gpt":0.2999949000067067,"score_spread":0.27556463403374215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W122286134","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021430306,0.011083932,0.003355535,0.65032345,0.0011233253,0.00007794523,0.00025779405,0.00006179491,0.31228593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60681593,0.009102741,0.0046157204,0.288366,0.0019150475,0.0002168647,0.00022763429,0.00011991429,0.08862011],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97611517,0.003786381,0.0005482738,0.0023532226,0.010980195,0.0062167477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97204137,0.017671926,0.0009042608,0.0009956568,0.006045285,0.0023414725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018285936,0.0005677798,0.0011566867,0.004183074,0.03719895,0.020776644,0.005838502,0.016290516,0.007387812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036547087,0.0006931353,0.0010247837,0.00613153,0.04991185,0.008932938,0.005036025,0.019234942,0.00067141216],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050781528,0.000009031557,0.00038417845,0.000024164166,0.000003957314,0.000070705544,0.002506279,0.000061995685,0.000038819413,0.96789795,0.023861418,0.0051364237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009111881,0.000029033472,0.0070695705,0.0005948916,0.000060474544,0.0001385474,0.010661853,0.001090322,0.00029915053,0.48071298,0.4991105,0.00014148292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9703138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97837573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1257093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1257093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18040365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91208905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1235474944","doi":"10.3138/9781442674639","title":"Establishing the Rules of the Game: Election Laws in Democracies","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Normative; Political science; Election law; Agency (philosophy); Law; Variety (cybernetics); General election; Political economy; Politics; Law and economics; Sociology; Social science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.020309459646307735,"score_gpt":0.264268891581997,"score_spread":0.24395943193568928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1235474944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029832775,0.009189519,0.060740564,0.015004826,0.000446263,0.00014343699,0.00011720704,0.0001282393,0.88439715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89131683,0.004894471,0.019695837,0.002564924,0.00036252537,0.0003265868,0.00018063826,0.00008811358,0.08057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744403,0.0013937636,0.0001317068,0.00022590374,0.00056142156,0.00024312326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956564,0.0031509316,0.00029328666,0.00040574235,0.00037138007,0.00012232411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038617214,0.00033274762,0.00040437392,0.001085068,0.0023990783,0.0055364007,0.00115493,0.0013784289,0.0026327444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010960973,0.000342199,0.0003270622,0.0015470984,0.011349359,0.0058431067,0.0016349031,0.0033118215,0.00062611245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028585318,0.0000069466864,0.00014824001,0.000010940038,0.0000011688587,0.0000141661585,0.0005640875,0.00054872455,0.000019410933,0.9927946,0.0016892931,0.0041993884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010527712,0.000009140584,0.0007452079,0.00008604052,0.0000030434271,0.000032727105,0.0005443013,0.0022346764,0.00013372888,0.9390842,0.057106335,0.000009996587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011533715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013870958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011533715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038555246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033446725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02797395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W124479448","doi":"","title":"Towards a civic republican theory of canadian constitutional law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Constitutional theory; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.043656627411462395,"score_gpt":0.26340414330657613,"score_spread":0.21974751589511374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W124479448","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022624506,0.0006470505,0.013012156,0.026745986,0.00013204984,0.000048331105,0.00019308324,0.00005061054,0.93654615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9244793,0.0006321411,0.006941351,0.0022076543,0.00009997118,0.000047696012,0.00007688242,0.000043735232,0.06547117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983891,0.00038875526,0.000025614476,0.00018149176,0.0004959199,0.0005190593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99792564,0.0005390653,0.00008385034,0.00017249216,0.0009496022,0.00032936645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019983905,0.0003198875,0.00033641563,0.003394355,0.013276492,0.00921879,0.0016077957,0.0019666287,0.015497716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004788293,0.00030766884,0.0003521387,0.0036333066,0.013909697,0.004056609,0.0016095028,0.0040164343,0.00056893285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.061507e-7,0.0000017387763,0.000059745595,0.0000014775504,2.8082746e-7,0.0000028635604,0.00026784727,0.00007405412,0.0000032769883,0.99752945,0.0012627593,0.0007958376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007314475,0.0000026304479,0.0011437233,0.000032030137,0.00000520704,0.000016177684,0.001778955,0.001759934,0.000040482704,0.9367934,0.05840805,0.000012035014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9014208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9293735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09857923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057694193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059395663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41860265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1257524986","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-18775-4_4","title":"The Challenges of Participatory Justice for Public Adjudication","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Citizen journalism; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.3591794197208242,"score_gpt":0.3771604515411503,"score_spread":0.01798103182032612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1257524986","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0057139085,0.022778956,0.032851767,0.20246793,0.0024186678,0.00008420447,0.00009672337,0.00008259597,0.73350525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64703655,0.012159264,0.021284433,0.040978123,0.0055039045,0.0007245742,0.00013318834,0.00043080034,0.27174926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97653687,0.015826376,0.000380705,0.0013512833,0.004352009,0.0015528549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9702528,0.025876302,0.00046983524,0.0016208149,0.0013599374,0.00042030253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024206765,0.00064758956,0.0010048953,0.001357806,0.012999066,0.018948745,0.0031865295,0.011136245,0.009789393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038334724,0.0006175543,0.0006939598,0.0023129035,0.05483576,0.015060853,0.004800176,0.016166693,0.0018167754],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011058594,0.0000038545827,0.000008180271,0.00000806883,8.300652e-7,0.0000051193265,0.0006225985,0.000039418603,0.000007388398,0.99151975,0.005856399,0.0019272328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034552404,0.0000017363109,0.000026150377,0.000053685602,0.000001003867,0.000006246795,0.00044141812,0.00013680432,0.000029598677,0.96072656,0.038569514,0.0000037320528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013646382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026008712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024206765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010142315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018764762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12801915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W127388596","doi":"10.7275/w4ez-yd90","title":"Contesting constitutional meaning : the political Constitution and the myth of judicial supremacy.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Constitution; Politics; Meaning (existential); Political science; Mythology; Law; Originalism; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Theology","score_opus":0.0219819495448625,"score_gpt":0.23844983113971188,"score_spread":0.2164678815948494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W127388596","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060586493,0.02161228,0.008956761,0.20283994,0.0009116748,0.000027383297,0.00007238183,0.000038646445,0.70495456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97794217,0.0019658036,0.00084440457,0.0057413266,0.00053910934,0.00004380623,0.00001665738,0.000023680599,0.0128831435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946004,0.004016119,0.00008035,0.0003555147,0.0004529509,0.00049470173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99404776,0.0047349087,0.00034039083,0.00035597518,0.00030882636,0.00021207298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069195456,0.00027435526,0.00031993724,0.00092117995,0.0068222485,0.00875114,0.00114879,0.0051040347,0.0040746247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013559821,0.00027847348,0.00024865338,0.00088817254,0.048662804,0.008292061,0.002825739,0.005771963,0.00035472808],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023678394,0.0000022157367,0.000037834954,0.000003783176,6.777985e-7,0.000011794705,0.0012271865,0.000029609893,0.000014292406,0.9963642,0.0015977036,0.0007083333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015555881,0.000006682931,0.0003738827,0.00007138671,0.0000034265784,0.000024366987,0.0022676117,0.00018700707,0.000082579354,0.96304053,0.03392111,0.0000058529417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006105885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009010026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00875114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058977352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004118974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042791247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W127556963","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Rights Coming Home to Roost? Rights Internationalism in American Courts","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital USD (University of San Diego)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; International human rights law; Law; Jurisprudence; Reservation of rights; Fundamental rights; Internationalism (politics); Right to property; Constitutionalism; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.01052998157433865,"score_gpt":0.2256508280608059,"score_spread":0.21512084648646726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W127556963","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03100755,0.041895792,0.0017536137,0.32789317,0.0013714319,0.000012297637,0.00004496466,0.000024709807,0.5959965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85679585,0.033204567,0.0011944431,0.07046203,0.0025641206,0.000034418976,0.000049568192,0.0000345245,0.035660468],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961599,0.0014823986,0.00012463318,0.0004062603,0.00079190143,0.0010347359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995704,0.0025678978,0.00036206408,0.00028167453,0.0006445878,0.00043977532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039409813,0.00011791065,0.0003195035,0.0011869221,0.0046056355,0.012936689,0.0008980279,0.0056649316,0.0048700674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065790173,0.00019878206,0.00045693052,0.0022485103,0.019958818,0.013461904,0.002478347,0.0072257756,0.00042759534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020375053,0.0000062126333,0.00023098929,0.000018778515,0.0000016519051,0.00008844398,0.001964496,0.00003385808,0.00003547447,0.9857669,0.0068850927,0.004965944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009589579,0.0000143577945,0.0021165696,0.0007262814,0.000018426404,0.00028797067,0.012339621,0.00016199339,0.00015229953,0.36210603,0.6220402,0.000026590462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059773628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06922078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059773628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010681143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066395495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11885142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W129572977","doi":"","title":"The rule of unwritten law: a cautious critique of Charkaoui v. Canada","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Jurisprudence; Rule of law; Citizenship; Appeal; Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Humanities; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01766387135502968,"score_gpt":0.24937815344638295,"score_spread":0.23171428209135328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W129572977","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038295027,0.021548616,0.0073453365,0.46228164,0.0009086318,0.00010111085,0.00024321827,0.00008731084,0.46918923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8960083,0.006305179,0.0030120786,0.06165499,0.0006620326,0.00009837046,0.00005481488,0.00009522179,0.032109067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98793614,0.0023659256,0.00023072398,0.0013864075,0.005316139,0.0027646152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922009,0.003934381,0.00033748642,0.0002958,0.0025807794,0.0006507781],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006971489,0.00046051588,0.000892949,0.0030931411,0.032312516,0.014799564,0.0043046167,0.010839313,0.0022774814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014640922,0.0004715534,0.0006716663,0.0032025152,0.056089334,0.0042360825,0.0028464117,0.017545497,0.00023640998],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035047126,0.0000032882435,0.00014399618,0.0000139452195,0.0000030961796,0.00006186663,0.0035342579,0.00007897085,0.000029636078,0.9877988,0.0065343883,0.0017941793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006555303,0.000021246851,0.0029873843,0.00064471125,0.000059964284,0.00018803455,0.012598333,0.0016902692,0.00051472825,0.583393,0.39769632,0.00014035606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9643101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96561784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11852152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11852152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15000945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85993785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W129869233","doi":"","title":"Doctrines Without Borders: The \"New\" Israeli Exclusionary Rule and the Dangers of Legal Transplantation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stanford Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Exclusionary rule; Political science; Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Common law; Unitary state; Legal doctrine; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02687096107789107,"score_gpt":0.31835366642894186,"score_spread":0.2914827053510508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W129869233","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22579223,0.015884262,0.050460935,0.12556717,0.00081821677,0.0000689985,0.00008282498,0.00008114959,0.5812442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829966,0.0018223681,0.0032191935,0.0057035643,0.00037406333,0.00003468051,0.000020847505,0.000020291873,0.0058083194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995278,0.0016281836,0.00022950704,0.0006953565,0.0015580349,0.0006109912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99506724,0.0028960437,0.00040801402,0.0006915577,0.00057126826,0.00036578084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009691168,0.00016725087,0.000474597,0.0017266645,0.0048345006,0.008808948,0.0015847606,0.004408146,0.0025032714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00983291,0.00023320454,0.0004958622,0.0009380097,0.04155307,0.007285797,0.005522019,0.00776981,0.0002965921],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024182502,0.0000037853692,0.00012181686,0.0000036805193,9.43509e-7,0.000026208647,0.000631467,0.000043055352,0.000040550112,0.99605227,0.00037806036,0.002695669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015279782,0.000011460301,0.0005135507,0.000075336495,0.000005165799,0.00009892026,0.0009856577,0.00039922807,0.00016264818,0.9717486,0.025974745,0.000009385847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069919825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073946095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009691168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055471016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005448639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051252365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W130846176","doi":"","title":"The legitimacy of judicial review in South Africa's new constitutional dispensation : insights from the Canadian experience","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Constitution; Justiciability; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Legitimacy; Judicial activism; Bill of rights; Separation of powers; Power (physics); Judicial independence; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.08105821159474702,"score_gpt":0.32022101388525787,"score_spread":0.23916280229051085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W130846176","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23341341,0.017795416,0.0018821852,0.35071343,0.0007714542,0.00012831685,0.0001660607,0.000073383,0.39505634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9683887,0.0042596175,0.0006689005,0.010230826,0.00013883277,0.0000256976,0.000018456865,0.000039355422,0.0162296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97872466,0.006039605,0.00068602595,0.0015250146,0.006395517,0.0066291234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9425521,0.03296503,0.0023049377,0.0018329702,0.014267763,0.006077276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025919475,0.00039352663,0.0007840456,0.0041734874,0.06936559,0.019804634,0.0024192159,0.0077360542,0.006143182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05923288,0.0007642971,0.00049487344,0.0058463844,0.044182375,0.005338666,0.005513798,0.012105985,0.00032168088],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009908719,0.00005016459,0.003360009,0.00015730626,0.000022741006,0.001895612,0.2092784,0.00043227203,0.0007031935,0.73243994,0.027242837,0.024318354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011480798,0.000066652596,0.015193936,0.0007791761,0.00007480001,0.00096931844,0.15059173,0.001044483,0.00091154093,0.054564066,0.77530444,0.00038504312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97861904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98787785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17672268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17672268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21292108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.954885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W131138394","doi":"","title":"‘‘What is a Crime?’: A Theory of the Legislative Response’","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legislator; Political science; Criminal law; Law; Legislature; Public law; Pluralism (philosophy); Philosophy of law; Value pluralism; Normative; Politics; Law and economics; Sociology; Legislation; Epistemology","score_opus":0.017300709620236696,"score_gpt":0.2988049783026434,"score_spread":0.2815042686824067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W131138394","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019064076,0.007523069,0.047710385,0.33570588,0.0013588762,0.00014645202,0.00013579402,0.000075868404,0.58827966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9282786,0.003497461,0.013696647,0.028415943,0.0016530285,0.00043174432,0.00013346318,0.000096749456,0.023796272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9844232,0.011800797,0.00028099926,0.0011942954,0.0013435809,0.00095716544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98760325,0.008979216,0.0009642897,0.00066167966,0.0012175102,0.0005740555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015574433,0.00066945667,0.0005883996,0.0034929928,0.008022317,0.011316411,0.0026862896,0.010463076,0.008200419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01847166,0.0005013248,0.0010568263,0.002888011,0.051481366,0.014951144,0.0036092899,0.008344979,0.0011914768],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022795218,0.0000059094336,0.00010864588,0.000016637106,0.0000025414338,0.000021978436,0.0035946784,0.0000946167,0.000011802428,0.99293447,0.0020687375,0.0011376857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010391862,0.000012278424,0.00056386756,0.00020438393,0.00000963275,0.000106265514,0.007086912,0.0012669332,0.00007418139,0.917242,0.0734066,0.000016628635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005606202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054379157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015574433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069331042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005997595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082366526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W133036322","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2580849","title":"Fixing Popular Participation in Constitution-Making","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Constitution; Legitimacy; Political science; Law and economics; Simple (philosophy); Majority rule; Democratic legitimacy; Order (exchange); Law; Divergence (linguistics); Economics","score_opus":0.04054630339493686,"score_gpt":0.34959178763558246,"score_spread":0.3090454842406456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W133036322","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31767645,0.00064298767,0.03639479,0.021261523,0.0005733576,0.00031740367,0.0001349417,0.00016120325,0.62283736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837637,0.000058261492,0.0018745747,0.0009081547,0.00010509376,0.00013517567,0.000014843573,0.000040216477,0.01310012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96104914,0.020358164,0.0011250356,0.004212409,0.005654594,0.007600635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93497866,0.046896953,0.0030473997,0.009367179,0.0036746704,0.002035161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038726468,0.00092294667,0.0016017571,0.0025859664,0.01426795,0.011322596,0.0035275912,0.012838166,0.01696817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08294251,0.001124908,0.001148034,0.00239608,0.027094468,0.009987096,0.012444167,0.014792042,0.0013696405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042675827,0.000052618816,0.0004893781,0.000020708425,0.000015618738,0.0000722241,0.0022481815,0.00033207375,0.00025479196,0.99276066,0.00088652363,0.0028245333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012460271,0.00008522301,0.0012399927,0.00007761109,0.000071027505,0.000051512274,0.0037598212,0.0013196131,0.0017658744,0.97104037,0.020429837,0.00003452518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053900178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008600536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038726468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006884139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008827265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20480758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W138869218","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.999676","title":"Method And Metaphysics: A Legal Historian'S Canon","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Canon; Philosophy; Epistemology; Law; Literature; Political science; Art; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.008995700963953739,"score_gpt":0.2797959075899469,"score_spread":0.27080020662599313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W138869218","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037257276,0.15265985,0.10705905,0.51684725,0.013272844,0.00013411646,0.00018331881,0.00025092255,0.20586678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47873068,0.09577286,0.14998107,0.12827477,0.044871967,0.0014953663,0.00021451237,0.0011536075,0.09950523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9717942,0.021677278,0.0009421039,0.0015043181,0.0034868356,0.0005952432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96156806,0.03157477,0.00093787356,0.0030324804,0.0020151802,0.00087162154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034401238,0.0010529878,0.0014570659,0.0077524185,0.0076836613,0.014228077,0.0033877252,0.008534758,0.008085951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034402918,0.0008086424,0.0009227361,0.0041144365,0.07724213,0.024146928,0.007457974,0.016826604,0.0015462613],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070312294,0.000010070119,0.00006531167,0.000051523097,0.0000035935986,0.00001670687,0.0017785677,0.00006943825,0.000019221146,0.9880213,0.0056561623,0.0043010837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014093746,0.000015633284,0.00011163153,0.00035303592,0.0000037340972,0.00005419472,0.0013158064,0.0005276448,0.00006116443,0.85306484,0.14446416,0.000013979935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008645666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058407723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034401238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011540861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075526144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18193328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W14063034","doi":"","title":"Foreign Law - a Friend of the Court: An Argument for Prudent Use of International Law in Domestic, Human Rights Related Constitutional Decisions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Suffolk transnational law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Human rights; Supreme court; International human rights law; Political science; Fundamental rights; Municipal law; International law; Sociology","score_opus":0.08173917450153739,"score_gpt":0.3428245931507893,"score_spread":0.2610854186492519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W14063034","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04747784,0.006493079,0.013587344,0.25165647,0.001437671,0.000092195005,0.000078237266,0.00008004153,0.6790972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9269427,0.0011767916,0.0026930815,0.048875496,0.0011450639,0.00010755573,0.000020159228,0.00003230209,0.019006766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903258,0.0051968144,0.00027060224,0.0011559463,0.0015209384,0.0015299026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9821982,0.014239499,0.00084274367,0.000866759,0.001302709,0.0005500874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013543108,0.00032869235,0.0005582271,0.0022702764,0.010421987,0.011237168,0.002223483,0.022387058,0.0047186064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025388565,0.0004935939,0.0008156527,0.0015016362,0.03620363,0.009974883,0.003972206,0.011759775,0.00059317675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044528165,0.0000049957525,0.00010005905,0.000006428287,0.0000019436634,0.0000842617,0.00094478443,0.00005439374,0.000023847886,0.9950287,0.0030145075,0.0007318271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039421197,0.000028293658,0.00056063675,0.00031836925,0.000035681434,0.00018008461,0.0034110008,0.0013390929,0.0004183935,0.9010473,0.09259103,0.00003067413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017146781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017452825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022387058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009183209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006584726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07162368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1417464479","doi":"","title":"Guides: Canadian Legal Research: Constitutional Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitutional law; Political science","score_opus":0.2425523615384947,"score_gpt":0.4164268628215001,"score_spread":0.1738745012830054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1417464479","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011224988,0.021483827,0.001828663,0.038446993,0.0024329831,0.0005275696,0.04107145,0.0012055379,0.8918805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009336702,0.010280911,0.004375252,0.004712977,0.00037903772,0.0003561275,0.0068435553,0.0005102461,0.9632052],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99518895,0.0004956724,0.00030677483,0.0003325966,0.003001534,0.0006745228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799319,0.003630914,0.00037677799,0.00071209564,0.014073186,0.001275215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050759823,0.0014182418,0.0012620233,0.013991426,0.013704669,0.013732921,0.0029887622,0.0070129945,0.2216946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019587174,0.0012379935,0.00091290544,0.020650111,0.0042220685,0.00465053,0.0019314452,0.0052027446,0.030966705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073560423,0.0000111353875,0.00013366244,0.00016099798,0.0000022100835,0.000018754672,0.00028274517,0.00007555048,0.00002237952,0.039346755,0.94561136,0.014327163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009212466,0.0000026119812,0.0014067221,0.00037557157,0.000007457565,0.000014414191,0.0004924109,0.00007323475,0.00008335324,0.005448078,0.99206525,0.000021584841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97291946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.989829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2216946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08203697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23090193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74164236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W141809283","doi":"10.21991/c90669","title":"JUDGING THE JUDGES: CANADA’S NEWEST SUPREME COURT JUDGE: HON. MICHEL BASTARACHE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Michel foucault; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.04030804881258754,"score_gpt":0.2551855852914567,"score_spread":0.21487753647886915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W141809283","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003423201,0.038569536,0.0009598022,0.8105469,0.018807063,0.00013359361,0.0006765648,0.00011713331,0.12676623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13212276,0.022184566,0.0034848598,0.27950755,0.007707438,0.00015459418,0.00045475143,0.00028104277,0.5541024],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929212,0.00078828115,0.00016718359,0.00067719014,0.0040825773,0.0013636692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98662496,0.0019226557,0.0002143766,0.00013727535,0.008508512,0.002592195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058137416,0.0006695904,0.0009063157,0.0019167911,0.026624652,0.0103832465,0.0023718963,0.008870957,0.010544204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016683625,0.0008361147,0.00042528132,0.0019871187,0.005737521,0.0026114562,0.0015363488,0.015419738,0.0029226895],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011630124,0.000007882818,0.0003356405,0.000020742194,0.000005450254,0.00008112112,0.00058404537,0.0000721308,0.000120760895,0.018271297,0.9753084,0.0051808907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029904146,0.000007604152,0.003723119,0.00020552907,0.000021860302,0.000067614514,0.0024597284,0.00023910464,0.0003283199,0.006329474,0.98651576,0.00007193335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.964003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98875135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05664985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05664985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.123004936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41102535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W142126840","doi":"10.29173/alr153","title":"&lt;i&gt;The Negotiable Constitution: On the Limitation of Rights&lt;/i&gt;, Gr&amp;eacute;goire C.N. Webber","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Negotiable instrument; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06788788183739189,"score_gpt":0.2861370335983741,"score_spread":0.21824915176098222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W142126840","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002829655,0.11662621,0.0058156014,0.11455275,0.0012643114,0.000051437506,0.00048333278,0.00007950031,0.7582972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46022877,0.10026288,0.009744334,0.05804925,0.0032989546,0.0005915142,0.00063964777,0.00035764385,0.36682704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954182,0.0017148695,0.00024283155,0.0005482964,0.001393609,0.0006823219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975318,0.0015440166,0.00021111118,0.00023739808,0.00038145523,0.000094258496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005503519,0.0005835963,0.0005324198,0.001854323,0.0043948665,0.0076600625,0.0019543308,0.00961011,0.014165167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010744372,0.0005905815,0.00046291895,0.0029376056,0.015413932,0.0069342796,0.0024574823,0.00622738,0.0030260794],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041522285,0.000004378598,0.000054364613,0.00003482967,0.0000015471153,0.000025309924,0.00038261866,0.00007141372,0.00004129039,0.9316506,0.063026875,0.0047027525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013141351,0.0000073321557,0.0008362234,0.00045915134,0.0000093452045,0.00007496537,0.00060391356,0.00016104276,0.00028019422,0.4688859,0.5286489,0.000019967318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0739364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09209035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0739364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009052543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009558713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14701211},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1434237992","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139003926.001","title":"Preface","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Skepticism; Law; Political science; Product (mathematics); Sociology; Constitutional law; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.050448021877567036,"score_gpt":0.2255756443811081,"score_spread":0.17512762250354108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1434237992","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010362237,0.007541205,0.002965329,0.016009571,0.041271847,0.0001651995,0.0039081583,0.00049026276,0.9266121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0070333686,0.0044741873,0.0012473859,0.0030732797,0.007703897,0.00012398411,0.0034249637,0.00046959068,0.97244924],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995011,0.00007677894,0.000026523569,0.000086133114,0.00026696577,0.000042411713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846435,0.0004119645,0.000055963803,0.00017612186,0.00069819833,0.00019342391],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068151654,0.00056522776,0.0004743214,0.0018939584,0.002274391,0.0033254295,0.0010119404,0.0009660333,0.32354784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043234504,0.00020580833,0.00029038862,0.0017615376,0.0008271526,0.002908488,0.0017430334,0.0028039839,0.13237599],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014541938,0.000013033818,0.000070204325,0.00009354121,0.0000010127834,0.000037147776,0.00037610208,0.000048584756,0.00010499904,0.02469388,0.9321094,0.04243751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.7221924e-7,0.0000029861442,0.000089889334,0.000056346395,2.8317186e-7,0.000022734974,0.00008533177,0.000009735843,0.000019563444,0.0019730388,0.9977381,0.0000012522315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028857698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043114526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32354784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019211647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014478175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W144651318","doi":"","title":"Reflections: On Judicial Diversity and Judicial Independence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial independence; Impartiality; Judicial discretion; Judicial activism; Political science; Legitimacy; Law; Judicial review; Judicial opinion; Independence (probability theory); Diversity (politics); Context (archaeology); Separation of powers; Politics; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0635851478675194,"score_gpt":0.3551902178925211,"score_spread":0.2916050700250017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W144651318","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005019657,0.00636056,0.00036859716,0.9182201,0.0027051838,0.000013638764,0.00009158534,0.000015151128,0.067205556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15944815,0.0064584347,0.0005760215,0.78638226,0.004113404,0.000029775398,0.00008154869,0.000061140796,0.04284923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9822253,0.003105154,0.00032515707,0.0015797678,0.0069231293,0.0058415327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977638,0.012418217,0.0007791365,0.0005789968,0.006035633,0.002550012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0107030235,0.0006132702,0.0007245816,0.0021552632,0.028758258,0.015199351,0.0050151646,0.021932883,0.008433472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027510632,0.0005432879,0.0009905706,0.0032474417,0.0534853,0.012785781,0.0084608225,0.03721627,0.0011118419],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027604085,0.000013678167,0.0006501753,0.000086697444,0.000009443675,0.00029191963,0.016596762,0.00018719363,0.00012221065,0.6160659,0.35869443,0.007254043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041926192,0.000013159614,0.0030526037,0.0006897664,0.000020376801,0.0001397308,0.02031822,0.00023920456,0.00030507962,0.0900865,0.8849989,0.00009454568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85741746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8932195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85741746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07332893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07126626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5320411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W145749697","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Stephen Gardbaum, 'The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism: Theory and Practice'","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Commonwealth; Constitutional theory; Political science; Legislature; Constitution; Scholarship; Law; Parliamentary sovereignty; Judicial review; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Subject (documents); Sovereignty; Sociology; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.03862496162319138,"score_gpt":0.3327595589332644,"score_spread":0.294134597310073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W145749697","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013711936,0.871023,0.0007055632,0.07325923,0.019128313,0.000029366802,0.00022652071,0.000046666395,0.035444263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0034918366,0.8262341,0.0009274404,0.05134266,0.015856301,0.00008319235,0.00042824534,0.00011071858,0.10152549],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883515,0.00026262144,0.00006654684,0.00019613391,0.00057247136,0.00006707639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99693704,0.0022089628,0.00017442774,0.00006808666,0.00049572357,0.00011578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010836202,0.0012622806,0.0015606215,0.0033379826,0.0012267914,0.003835937,0.0019846759,0.0034237565,0.022985764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005639427,0.0004965994,0.00060256856,0.0077898297,0.00290986,0.005313062,0.0012890637,0.005460274,0.012890896],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060707725,0.0000058006826,0.000036185596,0.0006130737,0.0000066860835,0.000026295073,0.00015747474,0.000071065595,0.000029595516,0.012100453,0.957758,0.029189227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004693412,0.0000036944207,0.00011848122,0.00083096646,0.0000046428345,0.00007895487,0.0000785912,0.000021639866,0.0000132749055,0.004082376,0.99475646,0.000006154799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012308129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023581319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022985764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040841075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005084982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.076895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W145826137","doi":"10.7202/1058125ar","title":"Will There Be a Science of Law in the Twenty-First Century?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Polity; Liberalism; Law; Legal science; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.01721302842834343,"score_gpt":0.2598059833284677,"score_spread":0.24259295490012428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W145826137","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028046628,0.09282823,0.0023785136,0.55660367,0.0035484054,0.000012853837,0.00008087119,0.000033645865,0.3164672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8060998,0.042018007,0.0021415462,0.07368435,0.004852945,0.00007592064,0.000088628854,0.000046113102,0.07099263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790925,0.0009623849,0.000050068214,0.0002381077,0.0004377429,0.00040238714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952857,0.002549186,0.00041901766,0.00028370222,0.0007452183,0.00071714155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037273848,0.00025006538,0.00038105462,0.0018268652,0.006464344,0.010667543,0.00075867365,0.0036587145,0.0063163815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074575124,0.00017531344,0.00032016088,0.0015680119,0.034898523,0.009108544,0.0020622567,0.004417206,0.0007580973],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005490267,0.000016183272,0.00034039235,0.000024530249,0.0000030389294,0.000024553725,0.0022531466,0.00003092866,0.00003228567,0.98255485,0.008555091,0.0061595133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074982595,0.00001592013,0.0009109152,0.00020899653,0.0000036308002,0.000039977887,0.005611609,0.000052781932,0.00004955709,0.61955065,0.3735376,0.000010858792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009777382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012777719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010667543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007398986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008142536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0536837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1482197541","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100010012","title":"David Rayside Queer Inclusions, Continental Divisions: Public Recognition of Sexual Diversity in Canada and the United States. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2008, 388 p.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Diversity (politics); Gender studies; Media studies; Political science; History; Sociology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.01978859783635975,"score_gpt":0.23369050411030087,"score_spread":0.21390190627394112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1482197541","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020290609,0.736063,0.00051631423,0.21757922,0.0021769446,0.000037717517,0.0014910315,0.000055191795,0.040051587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13530914,0.73089373,0.0016357695,0.041575797,0.0030357384,0.0001410586,0.0008853581,0.00013964529,0.0863837],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812263,0.00050406496,0.00009552405,0.000108982276,0.00080299197,0.00036574324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99449146,0.0022911252,0.00034299854,0.000099249206,0.0021354903,0.00063969137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025200117,0.0013757593,0.0008514719,0.00558984,0.01284013,0.0072761807,0.0034532838,0.00677634,0.01383822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061337273,0.0010972514,0.0004583474,0.0110972915,0.010470781,0.009332713,0.0018359735,0.0060398253,0.0018822091],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025851665,0.000014430146,0.0012635164,0.00030770912,0.000015516183,0.00015964043,0.008690226,0.00013735301,0.000043758708,0.04455248,0.9229858,0.021803625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003118023,0.000010548824,0.024726158,0.0024245793,0.000043980315,0.00017600115,0.03929707,0.00022236137,0.00023287095,0.032059148,0.90069294,0.00008319471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96103793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9872091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0468483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0468483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06320776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3399098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1482326114","doi":"10.21991/c9k088","title":"THE INDEPENDENCE AND IMPARTIALITY OF PROVINCIAL COURT JUDGES: RAPPORTEUR’S COMMENTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Independence (probability theory); Law; Political science; Judicial independence; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.047623515810483394,"score_gpt":0.28810369190912355,"score_spread":0.24048017609864014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1482326114","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027344848,0.0013050152,0.0002732431,0.9768415,0.0045390227,0.000027363043,0.00009998443,0.000019184929,0.014160166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.072717145,0.0017258773,0.0008187486,0.89389753,0.00697119,0.0001633255,0.000057317884,0.000086976936,0.023561876],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9652411,0.0071659437,0.002620096,0.005412074,0.010107504,0.009453379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9004272,0.06219241,0.0031474228,0.003603993,0.024493484,0.0061354097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028053425,0.00081841816,0.002061884,0.0019110461,0.039064918,0.014774964,0.009003825,0.0795365,0.006098516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11539751,0.0022629427,0.0027268364,0.0032343315,0.015747786,0.009395531,0.008312779,0.08741774,0.0016881613],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097164724,0.000024707053,0.0007256978,0.0001252879,0.00007564996,0.001087153,0.015132286,0.00030574907,0.00030591898,0.11568794,0.8635478,0.0028845887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000109906956,0.000031730426,0.0046695583,0.0007265578,0.00023586921,0.00086407724,0.020757716,0.0010508215,0.0012905698,0.037482493,0.9323238,0.0004568835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5711421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6266753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9565723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0434277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.060798943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8627671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1484726770","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139003926.011","title":"Vagueness, Finiteness, and the Limits of Interpretation and Construction","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Vagueness; Political science; Fundamental rights; Law; Legitimacy; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitution; Duty; Judicial interpretation; Charter; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Bill of rights; Substantive due process; Politics; Human rights; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03313308379269255,"score_gpt":0.21806935502611136,"score_spread":0.1849362712334188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1484726770","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032277547,0.0513771,0.3130549,0.0633142,0.0009686561,0.00015999976,0.00037974888,0.00022717337,0.5382407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89293694,0.009064243,0.074900426,0.0044510225,0.0011626964,0.0006831269,0.0002568958,0.0002467656,0.016297739],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9752882,0.015405669,0.0015073544,0.002435608,0.0044953525,0.00086780026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9534545,0.036821637,0.0014989524,0.005830957,0.0020239525,0.0003699698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02249212,0.0006932896,0.0013060278,0.003314717,0.005314738,0.017299779,0.0034688278,0.004066882,0.0031549614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03995369,0.0010313262,0.0011998283,0.0030878845,0.11856789,0.02494038,0.0067111384,0.008206526,0.0006314567],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015024484,0.0000012667072,0.000022348373,0.000015700729,0.0000014567174,0.000008987394,0.0008819885,0.00007675111,0.000023972052,0.9976419,0.00022885387,0.0010951489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002048802,0.0000013415678,0.000024199622,0.00003640045,0.0000014132856,0.0000116802075,0.00021113739,0.00010179923,0.000030961262,0.9943188,0.005257325,0.0000030200597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003599156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031220159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02249212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008763794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055037774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11895114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1485750150","doi":"","title":"Judicial Review, Charter Politics, and Federalism in Canada -- The American Influences","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Charter; Political science; Legislature; Politics; Law; Judicial review; Constitutionalism; Separation of powers; Fundamental rights; Context (archaeology); Democracy; Law and economics; Human rights; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.00855822107869351,"score_gpt":0.25695044335212863,"score_spread":0.24839222227343513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1485750150","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14584403,0.04454549,0.002377189,0.21842276,0.0012673035,0.0000920051,0.0005440195,0.00010837066,0.5867989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9324994,0.013128131,0.0009258626,0.013490293,0.00028271432,0.000026002463,0.000074300384,0.000048589558,0.03952476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941912,0.0009994963,0.000117338765,0.0006658925,0.0023585502,0.0016674396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901607,0.0029059574,0.0006384077,0.00021714017,0.0045618764,0.001515882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004508018,0.00021087058,0.00042927742,0.002538642,0.019898593,0.010841282,0.0011908947,0.002492524,0.005220641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012734201,0.00030164703,0.00029578505,0.005381052,0.01571929,0.0017551958,0.0017512343,0.0039587244,0.00017526664],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045503908,0.000030926712,0.0051098056,0.0000930334,0.000019302974,0.00028076247,0.010740511,0.00086380116,0.00019676099,0.9002845,0.049661823,0.032673206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050220082,0.000028037868,0.043511234,0.00052149355,0.000067244015,0.00016951915,0.011810234,0.00148931,0.00045461213,0.07213619,0.86961174,0.0001501683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99283254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99472976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18813479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18813479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20834818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94164854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1485831801","doi":"10.21991/c9kh3j","title":"A Democratic Defence of the Court Challenges Program","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Disadvantaged; Parliament; Political science; Public administration; Law; Democracy; Government (linguistics); Politics","score_opus":0.06703664203223589,"score_gpt":0.2888507386046461,"score_spread":0.22181409657241022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1485831801","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014625492,0.0016300785,0.010755261,0.4729355,0.0038984788,0.00034544207,0.00023970372,0.00018443214,0.4953856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50111467,0.0009045401,0.005647163,0.20120609,0.002840814,0.0006403381,0.00013288115,0.00018757606,0.28732598],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96513444,0.010232966,0.0007760528,0.004996161,0.011927493,0.0069328686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96565664,0.017621359,0.0012800222,0.0038414532,0.005893355,0.0057072793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034328714,0.0006502368,0.0006553324,0.0011888015,0.025597211,0.018940452,0.0030170255,0.022506053,0.010728293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050018977,0.00082226563,0.00077328656,0.0011205,0.024219675,0.0069402717,0.01206463,0.030350832,0.0013663782],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012057063,0.000023136727,0.00021580131,0.000018252771,0.0000052401992,0.000072053954,0.001798002,0.00015983717,0.0001546721,0.9531191,0.03882665,0.005595205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008323667,0.000046909972,0.0011248178,0.00013410927,0.000012745635,0.0000724879,0.0012972477,0.00081638177,0.00069036137,0.14791998,0.84773546,0.000066288565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26486003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36440033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26486003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03345786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13145381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5266367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1487630027","doi":"10.29173/mlj741","title":"Precedent Unbound - Contemporary Approaches to Precedent in Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Epistemology; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.11642084257986385,"score_gpt":0.2493470459688753,"score_spread":0.13292620338901145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1487630027","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032671735,0.015116326,0.012809657,0.063064285,0.00079732557,0.00013192755,0.00063477474,0.00012417675,0.8746498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7740999,0.009236077,0.0053458516,0.007734293,0.00021493522,0.00009357366,0.00022582168,0.00012824214,0.20292133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940706,0.00085703336,0.00015762873,0.0007722994,0.0018872716,0.0022551478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960114,0.0012200988,0.00014228719,0.0002108809,0.0016376291,0.0007778214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030276952,0.0005267928,0.00083650154,0.0036212553,0.040765572,0.017540073,0.0038671421,0.0048839035,0.02183627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009345576,0.00070331624,0.00053506886,0.0095455265,0.024072,0.004931338,0.0050137774,0.008496274,0.0009353123],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075586763,0.0000067884503,0.00040859386,0.000030145478,0.000003196549,0.00008570303,0.002426344,0.0005100723,0.000024138704,0.9803963,0.008686732,0.007414419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029633538,0.00001953311,0.004305828,0.00049563695,0.00003670623,0.00010451667,0.0100885425,0.0032563633,0.00020553792,0.41118428,0.5701658,0.00010770263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99455523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7614312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23856875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3557404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8831523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1487871244","doi":"","title":"Sexual Violence and \"Fundamental Justice\": On the Failure of Equity Reforms to Criminal Proceedings","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Sexual violence; Criminology; Criminal justice; Political science; Psychology; Law and economics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.04347658840632447,"score_gpt":0.3114686701813665,"score_spread":0.267992081775042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1487871244","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16782042,0.008915707,0.0033938312,0.35809445,0.00060817605,0.0001356395,0.00019708365,0.00006209069,0.4607725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98103285,0.0010633578,0.00025365513,0.011845741,0.00025325728,0.000028754008,0.000019040654,0.000014844638,0.0054883566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9775378,0.0072841416,0.00028975445,0.0011755067,0.0035779797,0.010134785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97305197,0.015624301,0.0020261398,0.0014390507,0.004470396,0.0033881918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02120814,0.0003735142,0.0008144656,0.0026196898,0.01915431,0.014712298,0.0032134447,0.008596903,0.007836653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06742548,0.00044448543,0.000488294,0.0030836056,0.05647972,0.007928503,0.0068824734,0.010789467,0.0002542844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014699482,0.000015984951,0.0006622641,0.00002035369,0.0000043532173,0.00001663266,0.0032087443,0.00013934048,0.000023415718,0.98564506,0.0039482405,0.006300972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000111999354,0.00007355991,0.024130791,0.00050831377,0.000076478966,0.000054882596,0.01963269,0.00075527694,0.00047727706,0.8538734,0.100238144,0.000067233756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66156906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7615835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33843094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05875158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13784212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.680848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1489197754","doi":"","title":"Is Substantive Equality a Constitutional Doctrine","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Political science; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.03015495902080766,"score_gpt":0.32675556533624345,"score_spread":0.2966006063154358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1489197754","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05437153,0.003479727,0.04565779,0.13541812,0.0019034281,0.00009984337,0.00023937204,0.000103617014,0.7587265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9581379,0.0007054681,0.004057906,0.01144994,0.001939933,0.00017046656,0.000088838584,0.000061011535,0.023388552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9751958,0.009691337,0.001030233,0.0044941236,0.0058794077,0.0037090862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9603626,0.025757872,0.0025383276,0.006516898,0.0032692268,0.0015550611],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016676499,0.00046992698,0.0019745042,0.0024128407,0.008979062,0.013325129,0.0035428589,0.012193818,0.016806727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045238975,0.0008751858,0.0011719838,0.0021931806,0.065682195,0.021368863,0.008738938,0.011725621,0.003089078],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005669675,0.000009780916,0.00005473738,0.000008036982,0.0000037385594,0.000009151495,0.00028069658,0.000020648678,0.00002456857,0.9976851,0.0008334395,0.001064459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016740954,0.0000075558273,0.00014193366,0.000019239818,0.00000777468,0.000020101888,0.0002745121,0.00006513124,0.000093399016,0.9911177,0.008231189,0.000004738816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025332961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018207749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016806727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036711555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056752875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08819485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1489382342","doi":"","title":"Bring in the Friendly Hand: The Effects of Judicial Inaction on Democratic Policymaking in Immigration Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Democracy; Political science; Law; Immigration law; Immigration policy; Law and economics; Immigration reform; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.007605430139763334,"score_gpt":0.276101440286716,"score_spread":0.2684960101469527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1489382342","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7057826,0.0008318636,0.0013294626,0.05232288,0.000298053,0.000076961485,0.00011408618,0.000030492563,0.23921357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951084,0.000086719425,0.000081379636,0.0023830847,0.00007722532,0.000020246292,0.0000052938854,0.000007785049,0.0022298626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9862785,0.0075607533,0.00027759984,0.0007421355,0.0011795063,0.003961608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9196001,0.06202516,0.0084876185,0.0025011518,0.0028731609,0.0045127594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014724691,0.0002732513,0.0008031245,0.001037423,0.011483603,0.010575677,0.0014078852,0.0074060387,0.021407854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.073780134,0.00036658903,0.00069268927,0.001327452,0.01702348,0.0047378168,0.006005033,0.009894381,0.0008545186],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022869427,0.0018586488,0.036758427,0.00019395791,0.00014183945,0.0011086906,0.03020658,0.004893727,0.0015958567,0.88267314,0.016479926,0.021802206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001438211,0.0007647457,0.11940973,0.00029844177,0.00043845555,0.00020339146,0.06400049,0.004573727,0.0030667002,0.77157927,0.034025613,0.00020131808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02666147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041769233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02666147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006188038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010722814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077872515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1489450614","doi":"10.21991/c9nd5w","title":"The Truth About Canadian Judicial Activism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial activism; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Scrutiny; Legislature; Judicial review; Deference; Parliament; Economic Justice; Judicial deference; Judicial independence; Judicial restraint; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.038149313754194385,"score_gpt":0.2667368051314889,"score_spread":0.2285874913772945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1489450614","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009173083,0.034980297,0.00040618272,0.7102221,0.0033435125,0.000017063152,0.000835855,0.00005268779,0.24096927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61166555,0.056614805,0.0013425273,0.26659676,0.004672507,0.00006935818,0.00096039113,0.00021119963,0.057866868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98811823,0.0011988044,0.00027153702,0.0016767444,0.0056770127,0.003057648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98258305,0.005728071,0.0007220655,0.0007197665,0.008015723,0.0022313823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068669966,0.00054622884,0.0008633109,0.0048736413,0.02485512,0.018557576,0.003120446,0.008183648,0.018850854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02498053,0.0004355963,0.00054036477,0.0075748935,0.01844399,0.0052274973,0.0032164443,0.012001593,0.0011279242],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054018812,0.00001650456,0.0020016988,0.00026118642,0.000026219777,0.00013658962,0.0069619594,0.00012522518,0.00012992878,0.5783382,0.37140137,0.040547244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027456004,0.0000087852295,0.007319294,0.0008931372,0.00003774909,0.00006817431,0.0076464307,0.0001610793,0.00018423695,0.036467154,0.94711715,0.00006942087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9836558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.987135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8554647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14453532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13562205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9922178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1491038314","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2005.00054.x","title":"TIPPINS AND WITTMANN ASKED THE WRONG QUESTION:. Evaluators May Not be \"Experts,\" But They Can Express Best Interests Opinions","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Psychology; Child custody; Best interests; Family law; Law; Process (computing); Reliability (semiconductor); Resolution (logic); Social psychology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.08894869586451364,"score_gpt":0.3804127153912334,"score_spread":0.29146401952671974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491038314","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009349885,0.013775,0.008855224,0.93031734,0.009503875,0.00016791125,0.00025310647,0.00009552143,0.027682243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.181864,0.010227096,0.014933735,0.7517663,0.0053445753,0.0004621228,0.00011020474,0.00011830676,0.035173666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913134,0.0034803315,0.0009459763,0.0012537858,0.0022690077,0.00073749083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96179724,0.028868405,0.0011464745,0.0010223016,0.0065270783,0.00063848414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018809928,0.0010670064,0.0012692261,0.0022679542,0.0084461495,0.0071980017,0.0030606322,0.026466293,0.0070826528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.067237675,0.0007928012,0.0012479905,0.0016663356,0.014533988,0.013475938,0.0043142047,0.023419566,0.0019404026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008295591,0.00004700787,0.0010569412,0.00032669722,0.000048564398,0.00057946594,0.0075234557,0.0003195048,0.0004933287,0.6163509,0.33044145,0.042729758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009240438,0.00008076689,0.0019905712,0.0011417373,0.000097842174,0.00081595633,0.009346991,0.00094331236,0.0022581147,0.3410482,0.64198124,0.00020279133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017289657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021887494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026466293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006039044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070607723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09947759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1491474467","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1742996","title":"Tapping Reeve, Coverture, and America's First Legal Treatise","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Tapping; Psychology; Political science; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.01790159148250894,"score_gpt":0.24637954877686727,"score_spread":0.22847795729435832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491474467","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19500916,0.002740645,0.0013422414,0.039329343,0.00028497408,0.000032255615,0.0001355635,0.00003322304,0.7610926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94731236,0.0005195431,0.00024473324,0.0061388584,0.00016828196,0.000032848944,0.000041112628,0.000039791525,0.045502543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969235,0.0006725412,0.000060196722,0.00036957418,0.00072727056,0.0012468015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952742,0.0030282391,0.00039781016,0.0003821688,0.00051585527,0.0004017221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038639195,0.00019538552,0.0004907734,0.0015752653,0.010329869,0.010303422,0.0011528379,0.0067083957,0.01344942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015276436,0.00021476853,0.00036493415,0.0015072605,0.011404197,0.0071233064,0.0046368497,0.010671162,0.00074400165],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002372084,0.000024360814,0.0007192005,0.0000149777925,0.0000043553705,0.000090065034,0.005175279,0.000040492676,0.0001365901,0.9800189,0.008360111,0.0053918283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007105743,0.000076919154,0.015086019,0.00045470835,0.00004757145,0.000227221,0.017007014,0.0004589003,0.0011245825,0.5266098,0.43876553,0.00007072703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03360134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07499204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03360134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006996129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073361355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0668115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1491901897","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1107","title":"So What is the Real Legacy of Oakes?: Two Decades of Proportionality Analysis under the Canadian Charter’s Section 1","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Deference; Supreme court; Adjudication; Law; Political science; Proportionality (law); Context (archaeology); Sociology; History","score_opus":0.0420602414364565,"score_gpt":0.3336171573435262,"score_spread":0.2915569159070697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491901897","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06299466,0.032961186,0.0038065924,0.6524625,0.0052080015,0.000060687322,0.0006082024,0.00013037847,0.24176784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68990934,0.021576349,0.0037022897,0.18294826,0.0021804483,0.00004732158,0.00041338927,0.0002145296,0.09900804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9828765,0.0018312522,0.00026522178,0.0020882885,0.00944181,0.003496898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859628,0.004373627,0.00064167206,0.0007600981,0.00656166,0.0017001085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012833876,0.00053273863,0.00063061714,0.0027494964,0.024876602,0.017777784,0.0025178911,0.005838837,0.0029968682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02669904,0.0005218588,0.0006565458,0.0036459228,0.033473626,0.010941073,0.003679,0.016537473,0.00033106963],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037438327,0.000020738757,0.0025814788,0.00008325858,0.000019953819,0.00047372968,0.021458905,0.00023291311,0.00022008384,0.79055244,0.13794738,0.04637163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021862867,0.000023428514,0.009985586,0.0007541146,0.00004545285,0.00037371935,0.028427968,0.0006791901,0.0008157583,0.119745694,0.83891314,0.00021402114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9510105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9660421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08460455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08460455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12764062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6138518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493510671","doi":"","title":"What Roles for the Judiciary in Aiding 'Vulnerable People'?: Contending Views in the American and Canadian Supreme Courts","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Legislature; Democracy; Supreme court; Constitution; Duty; Economic Justice; Politics","score_opus":0.023623604402048446,"score_gpt":0.2889459726985016,"score_spread":0.2653223682964531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1493510671","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017866155,0.016951755,0.0012313777,0.8243482,0.001201844,0.00004114029,0.000108456,0.00002328136,0.13822773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69398254,0.010661568,0.0018086546,0.27168882,0.0011960007,0.00009114278,0.00006303518,0.000062247105,0.02044607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9736695,0.0060967463,0.0004747338,0.0021608793,0.008430505,0.009167531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97863597,0.0076823533,0.0008375231,0.00042736574,0.007148796,0.005267978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018490871,0.00083012815,0.00092117593,0.004284073,0.057948224,0.04076436,0.009980771,0.036262225,0.0033992636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029004525,0.0008002757,0.001041013,0.00496735,0.081061654,0.012858239,0.0057708877,0.0308939,0.000446512],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021530892,0.000021274935,0.0012273111,0.00006564475,0.000016479144,0.00015305716,0.052751347,0.0001585474,0.00010869724,0.88370585,0.05411564,0.0076546217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000110888184,0.000035869005,0.0084000435,0.0027653687,0.00016586277,0.00021952343,0.18014732,0.0013175502,0.0004062706,0.3505044,0.45552284,0.00040405197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9745643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97910744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17630316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17630316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1800452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95537156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W149426997","doi":"10.21991/c93x06","title":"JUDICIAL REVIEW IN THE NEW HONG KONG: PROPHECIES AND PORTENTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.061022954876434284,"score_gpt":0.2913992043137709,"score_spread":0.23037624943733664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W149426997","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80113,0.03666767,0.00061379693,0.09296042,0.00062660803,0.00009112521,0.00015412726,0.000017136115,0.06773917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9783804,0.0066520586,0.00017784651,0.0051645245,0.00031276888,0.000029355995,0.00001905048,0.0000071468808,0.0092568],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900928,0.004273806,0.0007714089,0.00089431676,0.0014124281,0.0025552218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95441324,0.027069453,0.005254478,0.0013156771,0.0066397814,0.005307369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01454289,0.00019269084,0.00065683713,0.0024273552,0.008862798,0.01334503,0.0013869889,0.0030069079,0.0022433226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02448144,0.00078901596,0.00039350637,0.0030334394,0.01909497,0.0032245098,0.0029601047,0.0046850233,0.00014769306],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006677101,0.00029189978,0.15642446,0.000746002,0.0002674633,0.0055850944,0.09392795,0.0033501058,0.0011027677,0.6207949,0.04238978,0.07445182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031265538,0.00039310992,0.6142511,0.0015699373,0.00032407374,0.0009812525,0.080146946,0.004020676,0.0014720205,0.044702247,0.2513226,0.00050351693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6332487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7638305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6332487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04263846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054323524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73782235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1497961817","doi":"","title":"Thick Instrumentalism and Comparative Constitutionalism: The Case of Gay Rights","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Instrumentalism; Scholarship; Political science; Framing (construction); Law; Sociology; Mainstream; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Politics; Democracy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04590341195432154,"score_gpt":0.3101113995582699,"score_spread":0.26420798760394837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1497961817","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08663806,0.0070025898,0.052737977,0.05766197,0.00067825284,0.00012100427,0.00004440669,0.0000547327,0.7950609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9727298,0.00092160195,0.0042164666,0.0033454024,0.00025370702,0.00015813431,0.000018253202,0.00004752411,0.018309128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98804176,0.00832991,0.00024468818,0.00075563916,0.0014290767,0.0011989941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917463,0.006010597,0.0004863562,0.0009537352,0.00036890645,0.00043409952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015817782,0.0005025944,0.0005908895,0.0026999472,0.013665226,0.012553003,0.0018169311,0.0060134833,0.005723934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019050524,0.0004259601,0.0007530313,0.0019296041,0.079272896,0.015394008,0.014667561,0.010270652,0.00041377477],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024135934,0.0000024283447,0.000022163013,0.000005148542,7.830793e-7,0.000033134907,0.001882765,0.000028684079,0.000018387753,0.99731535,0.000119047065,0.0005696497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000130417375,0.000016576447,0.00013529308,0.000108770684,0.0000047542526,0.00006945958,0.0037626638,0.0002484598,0.00019042463,0.95990086,0.0355397,0.0000099309555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034593989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003071225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015817782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060520894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040446105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08365339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1498821330","doi":"10.21991/c9zq18","title":"Sometimes Constitutions are Made in the Streets: the Future of the Charter’s Notwithstanding Clause","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Legislature; Charter; Political science; Parliament; Law; Constitution; Law and economics; Politics; Order (exchange); Constitutional law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.04098074569533218,"score_gpt":0.2691496057889388,"score_spread":0.22816886009360665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1498821330","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14540522,0.009702474,0.006690204,0.11002007,0.0007156875,0.000026522326,0.00014660263,0.00004301088,0.72725034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97751856,0.0019235129,0.00068775396,0.0030854363,0.00017962365,0.000014777672,0.000039915165,0.000024936477,0.016525455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947226,0.0022770423,0.000076547534,0.00044506302,0.0013014774,0.0011772219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99580437,0.0024272988,0.00046389445,0.00035646735,0.0007332149,0.00021466294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050293016,0.00014072063,0.00022071178,0.0008381467,0.011549709,0.008561038,0.00052042276,0.0021493654,0.0025392976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008811159,0.00021374994,0.00017048171,0.001405403,0.019914126,0.00847397,0.0019084321,0.004549013,0.0002592116],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053478284,0.0000017418279,0.00029855728,0.000008115148,0.000001068694,0.000034669916,0.0077613285,0.000050677176,0.000050435672,0.9857167,0.0034418819,0.0026294324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016043636,0.000022096216,0.0043965187,0.00026418283,0.000013434384,0.00013787686,0.0296111,0.00040186627,0.00061773974,0.34770674,0.6167718,0.000040550727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.106004015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19143583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.893996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0098105585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010373369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.210774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W149979645","doi":"10.1007/978-3-322-80409-9_16","title":"Der Beitrag der kanadischen Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit zur Integration nationaler Minderheiten","year":2002,"lang":"de","type":"book-chapter","venue":"VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.03560796818584716,"score_gpt":0.2731514194762869,"score_spread":0.23754345129043974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W149979645","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023814915,0.03480152,0.016134853,0.1173036,0.003427311,0.00013140317,0.00045240181,0.0005721033,0.80336195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5450739,0.022855718,0.014452175,0.010346841,0.0016205152,0.00030926807,0.0006518938,0.00042453446,0.4042652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99451524,0.0018137029,0.00018784951,0.00072973885,0.0015759077,0.0011775098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99474984,0.0011816105,0.0005203404,0.0008613185,0.0010637512,0.0016231473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067967433,0.00090997585,0.00049243926,0.0030193082,0.007838236,0.01689427,0.0018393743,0.004449896,0.109282196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068905614,0.0004992482,0.0005163552,0.003997879,0.01077425,0.013591065,0.017366793,0.0056482065,0.012159765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050075807,0.000039365386,0.001299411,0.0002647222,0.000012880587,0.000109500856,0.01039441,0.00025483881,0.00048599776,0.83412313,0.05172882,0.101236865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006431765,0.0000190223,0.0018597862,0.00034125443,0.000005395293,0.00006929164,0.002915853,0.00019223627,0.0001782336,0.03908952,0.9553069,0.0000160699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041451253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06482036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9585487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018861778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02023785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3655854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500276302","doi":"10.5040/9781474200127","title":"Gender and Judging","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Objectivity (philosophy); Blindness; Gender studies; Gender relations; Sociology; Political science; Sociological research; Geography; Social science; Epistemology; Optometry","score_opus":0.05771760461099727,"score_gpt":0.2674381270658975,"score_spread":0.2097205224549002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1500276302","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0071999277,0.004038354,0.0013348758,0.0056097643,0.00084959425,0.000015060558,0.000020151792,0.000018896731,0.9809132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80765945,0.0031938017,0.0012786486,0.0030576196,0.0007261666,0.00004090127,0.000046700512,0.00008581727,0.18391097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959163,0.0020421995,0.00009300158,0.00045089202,0.0010004316,0.00049722823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99683565,0.0017653137,0.00020103627,0.0003389053,0.0006017354,0.00025728875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030422274,0.00038809702,0.00038424152,0.0009057631,0.0048912554,0.0099106515,0.00081335224,0.0015621827,0.007996198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010233686,0.00015815954,0.00020007318,0.0008360389,0.024712717,0.004421616,0.0027636676,0.0027498142,0.0011763357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069839652,0.0000035253581,0.00016707479,0.000019742463,0.0000011984913,0.000051038434,0.007490926,0.00003741862,0.000069291564,0.9732719,0.009492238,0.009388779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008676967,0.000021390035,0.0010725994,0.0002644464,0.0000049224723,0.00015515533,0.012139819,0.00016069997,0.00035776215,0.43920934,0.5465911,0.000014133178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006216168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076166745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0099106515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004424871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028045427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03210485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500302751","doi":"","title":"HABERMAS’IN İLETİŞİMSEL EYLEM KURAMI’NDA HUKUK","year":2014,"lang":"tr","type":"article","venue":"DergiPark (Istanbul University)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics","score_opus":0.013109857157003335,"score_gpt":0.21682778232636402,"score_spread":0.2037179251693607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1500302751","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07076456,0.17055172,0.0016731659,0.30623502,0.0039146007,0.000080163125,0.00026392008,0.000057477817,0.4464594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78302056,0.02307931,0.0011067676,0.04549184,0.0006871434,0.00012432673,0.0001786406,0.000050121045,0.14626136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991041,0.00030649442,0.00003564729,0.0000988342,0.0001705438,0.00028442286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997533,0.00009496593,0.00003802271,0.000016236454,0.00006764178,0.000029798464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014348488,0.00043804245,0.00028114946,0.0005954309,0.005572157,0.0042131785,0.000722762,0.004219619,0.006753102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017485064,0.00028679884,0.00024641346,0.0006884424,0.0045966404,0.0052322084,0.0028435763,0.003345526,0.0009335468],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005361306,0.000054962813,0.0010946441,0.00016507105,0.000010843928,0.00071567093,0.016183585,0.0001234845,0.00018767556,0.7862482,0.15433176,0.040830463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020517233,0.000018217524,0.0059811547,0.00043601656,0.000014306545,0.00030078288,0.011886991,0.0001539757,0.000535248,0.05065936,0.92995864,0.000034889512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027116217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054771405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027116217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006314577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045105913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053916752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500640283","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1031","title":"Ifs and Buts in Charter Adjudication: The Unruly Emergence of Constitutional Exemptions in Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Charter; Political science; Law; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.04548538059424122,"score_gpt":0.2817187433131049,"score_spread":0.2362333627188637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1500640283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5454787,0.009906014,0.0072188196,0.18354915,0.0007032336,0.0001738408,0.0010527283,0.00010806091,0.25180945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759257,0.0016398766,0.0017752699,0.0053779283,0.00013147575,0.00002395852,0.00010458815,0.00006299643,0.014958341],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98097163,0.0028651515,0.0006696806,0.0016980536,0.008651493,0.0051439293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9168578,0.03629325,0.0042516435,0.0030814328,0.032824416,0.006691447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02429457,0.00021233837,0.0008834309,0.0042488636,0.02039587,0.014106151,0.00328393,0.0044343295,0.004796635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09166951,0.0007300169,0.0005669762,0.006587752,0.018859511,0.004562498,0.003451945,0.011920008,0.00025311726],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000115662704,0.00005408743,0.02458397,0.000085839194,0.000034587803,0.00022116156,0.01552254,0.0016369907,0.0004368925,0.87620604,0.031137448,0.049964864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016379854,0.00009770788,0.2674772,0.001149697,0.00024889625,0.00023474381,0.033445604,0.013253405,0.0023958078,0.28741565,0.39368683,0.00043068622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9909073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8799706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12002939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24788164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8708782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500693252","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100010279","title":"Allan Hutchinson The Province of Jurisprudence Democratized. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, 240 p.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Political science; Media studies; Library science; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.010975582864604573,"score_gpt":0.23777698154108706,"score_spread":0.2268013986764825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1500693252","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00078156777,0.7863959,0.0013935191,0.095861524,0.0031723925,0.000019737761,0.00047790655,0.00008436972,0.111813016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.106497474,0.67829454,0.00446676,0.018868102,0.0075707394,0.00019229091,0.0006177876,0.00036959152,0.18312277],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794394,0.00078652764,0.00017413097,0.0002620945,0.0006186997,0.00021453289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995637,0.002880994,0.0003204275,0.0002650374,0.0006349576,0.0002614919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025641993,0.0012766004,0.0010130435,0.0046017505,0.0035417192,0.006809592,0.0016064087,0.0038187364,0.017820958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007129795,0.0013062379,0.00042308765,0.0060182707,0.0129934205,0.011557257,0.0017099157,0.0058374056,0.004908132],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003000548,0.000016149213,0.0002088697,0.00036039093,0.000012805268,0.00009618938,0.0034194065,0.0001659482,0.000056621615,0.44794232,0.5040279,0.043663435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000114940785,0.0000050939766,0.001623631,0.0011730883,0.000008743834,0.00009491998,0.001213828,0.00008923406,0.000074223775,0.16310136,0.83258957,0.000014738603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.070966534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13264726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070966534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0104503855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010114822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14110696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1501988359","doi":"","title":"Internationalizing Gosselin: A Retrospective Case Comment","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Ratification; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Political science; Cultural rights; Scrutiny; Law; Dissent; Politics; Fundamental rights; Human rights","score_opus":0.022498679519826655,"score_gpt":0.3153504110163679,"score_spread":0.29285173149654126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1501988359","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33421433,0.0042978376,0.0027722502,0.27896476,0.0013055205,0.00034366356,0.0005729407,0.00011415152,0.37741458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8368785,0.0032603478,0.0011325236,0.09665626,0.000609175,0.00015057877,0.0001831276,0.00006550166,0.061063908],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945292,0.0010107481,0.00013852405,0.00075940404,0.0016137834,0.0019483663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942234,0.0037561746,0.0004155496,0.0002343909,0.0008630365,0.00050743186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005893373,0.0004946334,0.00046620678,0.0018181457,0.018913297,0.00735865,0.0018458766,0.010374935,0.0034912806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017825032,0.0004394653,0.00041135587,0.0029878786,0.0103556635,0.0024582655,0.0038578273,0.010900718,0.00031179073],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011046418,0.000083210274,0.011873941,0.00018046623,0.000029885447,0.028131777,0.16939534,0.0009811068,0.0011986629,0.599095,0.16929013,0.019629966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023036746,0.00006939168,0.0056690583,0.0005803247,0.00007877939,0.004184477,0.13273989,0.0007157853,0.0023934194,0.023039725,0.83036095,0.00014508386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4831296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.65671885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4831296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0223451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029749453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96063495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1502229805","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1152322","title":"Is Bigger Always Better? On Optimal Panel Size, with Evidence from the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Vector Institute; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.04360931027676034,"score_gpt":0.2494148185520122,"score_spread":0.20580550827525185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1502229805","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7907231,0.024073793,0.0020992854,0.04883871,0.00043968533,0.0003414083,0.0057700137,0.000081717335,0.12763219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987912,0.0017537436,0.00051320344,0.0033915439,0.00017151958,0.000035676552,0.00073588267,0.000024668863,0.005461803],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98535466,0.0045406753,0.00052892533,0.0023973542,0.0039449735,0.003233416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75197524,0.19506942,0.0163854,0.0074852863,0.02197281,0.0071118693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025795335,0.0007707855,0.0025759707,0.0020871677,0.007594242,0.0066067874,0.0042684064,0.0050710314,0.025530413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13755742,0.0006102735,0.0012670386,0.004404205,0.007419448,0.0047993124,0.0022006491,0.0037710343,0.0013523819],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007864762,0.0011803601,0.54375446,0.0020045494,0.003144588,0.0022433633,0.010570419,0.017904766,0.0012033107,0.18713188,0.13075289,0.09224461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035571768,0.0007119467,0.77285373,0.0015398118,0.0070218085,0.0002703396,0.0252292,0.014590297,0.001220006,0.11253664,0.06007014,0.00039900254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9083469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95923007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09165311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022286206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03823958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18438572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1505612915","doi":"10.24124/c677/2009136","title":"Fair Opportunity to Participate: The Charter and the Regulation of Electoral Speech","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Political Science Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Democracy; Supreme court; Ideal (ethics); Politics; Law; Liberal democracy; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Political science; Political philosophy; Law and economics","score_opus":0.06832494336399025,"score_gpt":0.3569843105746486,"score_spread":0.2886593672106583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1505612915","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.070449345,0.015817815,0.02764163,0.14156394,0.0017344328,0.000233461,0.0002659249,0.00012189679,0.7421716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9096848,0.0034593784,0.0035817034,0.016426714,0.0006191663,0.00016630578,0.00007843085,0.000046124933,0.06593735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98513675,0.005486867,0.0003184861,0.0012548423,0.0050784824,0.0027245653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99331164,0.0035809672,0.00052068685,0.000438699,0.0017066714,0.00044134984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014134024,0.00038450753,0.00040804507,0.001851751,0.009822341,0.009383393,0.0018638339,0.005649125,0.0034084967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016169386,0.00027087968,0.0003699088,0.0016441732,0.024701037,0.003343085,0.0023921952,0.0059105703,0.00049428723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014701814,0.000010823331,0.00036512845,0.00002027036,0.0000035512728,0.000054154807,0.0026064173,0.00025149607,0.00014601705,0.9818252,0.007205573,0.0074967206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009202819,0.000079228455,0.010355752,0.0003436975,0.000030228035,0.00008958953,0.003625464,0.0017455232,0.0013773923,0.54032016,0.44180486,0.00013613887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.588079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64904577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97137463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028625397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04195396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8286938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1507653378","doi":"","title":"Modernism, Polarity, and the Rule of Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Modernism (music); Positivism; Law; Romanticism; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; History; Aesthetics; Art history","score_opus":0.04537545132144194,"score_gpt":0.31114190461469954,"score_spread":0.2657664532932576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1507653378","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031734344,0.011416505,0.009729669,0.076358445,0.0010783556,0.000036850677,0.000083114166,0.000040795196,0.869522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9563849,0.0051600467,0.002220887,0.006417001,0.0018957922,0.00006350175,0.000061902014,0.000048759248,0.027747225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965262,0.0018119277,0.00008018361,0.00036888206,0.0007597597,0.00045296462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996201,0.002357725,0.0003637375,0.00033240343,0.0005210866,0.000224027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028885715,0.0003161218,0.00040727467,0.0017099346,0.005032741,0.00902595,0.000915227,0.0029772753,0.004515381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063389996,0.0002705991,0.00035741078,0.001116664,0.036450952,0.008120548,0.0029488252,0.0051326426,0.00083151273],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030464203,0.0000028087698,0.000076391974,0.000007875873,8.177245e-7,0.00001206306,0.00052562734,0.000032162454,0.000017864282,0.99656373,0.0013975138,0.001359992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006299973,0.0000051804573,0.00021477304,0.000030181125,0.0000018956543,0.00002655921,0.000508954,0.00011008382,0.00004937994,0.95931166,0.03973138,0.0000037059654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036242467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025390622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00902595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006030858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030834984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04375714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1508142592","doi":"","title":"The Lawmakers: Judicial Power and the Shaping of Canadian Federalism","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Power (physics); Law; Politics","score_opus":0.0428968263195241,"score_gpt":0.2783841588286005,"score_spread":0.2354873325090764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1508142592","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24368152,0.007022128,0.0024107993,0.1486758,0.00038562223,0.000054995024,0.00031870915,0.000057244106,0.59739316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98527616,0.0011041835,0.00041250058,0.0025471647,0.000047831672,0.000008575232,0.00002402748,0.000020936704,0.01055855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.991252,0.001577772,0.00015189724,0.00072241516,0.0026845818,0.0036112787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864867,0.0053661996,0.00065704266,0.0005260942,0.0052716127,0.0016924762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008727529,0.0002681835,0.00055596296,0.004049433,0.036486365,0.017299244,0.0022960824,0.004560404,0.010172577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030234518,0.0004899204,0.0003964051,0.0057649296,0.027585937,0.0041446746,0.003418252,0.0062134136,0.0003147946],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030815325,0.000010178828,0.0027421785,0.00003782478,0.00001012022,0.00007777085,0.026637642,0.00029972655,0.00015203562,0.9484805,0.012475323,0.009045906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074196454,0.000028745515,0.052932594,0.0005443816,0.00011776919,0.0001124424,0.094418645,0.0019028141,0.00078196294,0.34315434,0.50570434,0.00022785888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9885924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9954136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19297574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19297574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24323381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9360337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1508480457","doi":"","title":"Judicial Appointment, Democratic Aspiration and the Culture of Accountability","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Charter; Separation of powers; Judicial independence; Legislature","score_opus":0.01709328144274032,"score_gpt":0.2745444512393481,"score_spread":0.2574511697966078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1508480457","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09558558,0.0044449805,0.0073267175,0.08710679,0.00048968266,0.000052028732,0.00005456325,0.0000857547,0.8048538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98040956,0.0008651257,0.0006861569,0.0037565196,0.0001145252,0.000023038632,0.000011989777,0.000029957653,0.014103073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97349316,0.012668706,0.0006317973,0.002208603,0.0053422893,0.005655455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9862175,0.005490095,0.0018758331,0.0012058073,0.0024829207,0.0027278394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015034457,0.00026321222,0.00039006,0.0019223783,0.023746148,0.019430906,0.0012979729,0.0025467798,0.0024092726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017812312,0.00032688113,0.00021350125,0.0021625832,0.062987044,0.005341774,0.006900135,0.007741671,0.00041116687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048319234,0.000012392028,0.0007884609,0.000009009727,0.000002356756,0.000042138337,0.030858388,0.00010034466,0.000061030143,0.95982057,0.0033844097,0.004916202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027072587,0.000038781094,0.004831656,0.00026930802,0.000011379742,0.00010104741,0.03181392,0.00061984395,0.00042491456,0.5206657,0.44109944,0.00009684929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24115662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24963349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24115662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027764548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03532165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4795059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1508782159","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100009169","title":"W. J. Waluchow A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review: The Living TreeCambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007, 283 p.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.016474768161086957,"score_gpt":0.25084608670783126,"score_spread":0.2343713185467443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1508782159","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021463388,0.5969922,0.039318882,0.20185632,0.0028206487,0.00010913029,0.0009794157,0.00026661032,0.1555105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20632015,0.5701105,0.03945331,0.024647139,0.008277936,0.0004954988,0.0008106013,0.00066442176,0.14922051],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99616444,0.0013963904,0.00044169102,0.0005944368,0.0011376418,0.00026546928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904038,0.006848709,0.00070437294,0.0004667417,0.001299252,0.00027706815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063298033,0.0016708244,0.0014119496,0.005607866,0.0037772323,0.010382998,0.0021285424,0.009590208,0.02168657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021819282,0.002189715,0.0011602024,0.009757989,0.014096335,0.022499362,0.0018612904,0.00764883,0.0064984085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021641627,0.000014556184,0.0002570557,0.00025498183,0.000033014363,0.00008832642,0.0007769768,0.00037344178,0.00007248501,0.8398056,0.13883068,0.019471336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014079825,0.000006543194,0.0007208914,0.00046039536,0.000016832644,0.00007082248,0.00023603083,0.000281626,0.00008185622,0.88049203,0.11759462,0.00002422385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019474927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034047864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9805251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00718435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008465701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.072548866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1509336770","doi":"","title":"The Comparative Roles of Courts and Administrative Agencies: Applying Constitutional Principles of Diversity in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Charter; Fundamental rights; Reasonable accommodation; International human rights law; Constitution; Sociology","score_opus":0.1111043011391224,"score_gpt":0.2998630078696602,"score_spread":0.1887587067305378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1509336770","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2753389,0.010076559,0.0071469517,0.0876689,0.0006053603,0.0003624174,0.00044935895,0.00010608118,0.61824536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96431214,0.0027669836,0.0029303215,0.007037179,0.00008661134,0.0000845137,0.000082797524,0.000042567834,0.022657007],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96516275,0.00645945,0.0010271599,0.0024455248,0.011535318,0.013369792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9629492,0.016206432,0.0015872583,0.0017135494,0.010750487,0.0067931465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016611777,0.0003692121,0.00085428497,0.0049241576,0.04594637,0.035274107,0.0055525918,0.006578491,0.0062588924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037419748,0.0011846184,0.00079289003,0.0070206495,0.035137895,0.006220258,0.012077055,0.009151371,0.00027497878],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003538606,0.000031798667,0.005966181,0.000078467056,0.00004466277,0.00048677952,0.018860834,0.0012611954,0.00026256128,0.9495377,0.0074807266,0.015953712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018491935,0.000118435884,0.05803593,0.0014902632,0.0004247258,0.00040816158,0.12112176,0.008713893,0.0016845942,0.25391328,0.55322075,0.0006832246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99218243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2639093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2639093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3755091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85376084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510074182","doi":"10.21991/c99d4d","title":"L’activisme judiciaire, le prix de la transaction démocratique en Espagne","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01163452758851118,"score_gpt":0.264678791920187,"score_spread":0.2530442643316758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1510074182","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15338664,0.009826184,0.006184978,0.07682645,0.0006575974,0.000045418896,0.00007294648,0.000028761731,0.752971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.887896,0.002742783,0.00080679933,0.005324191,0.00021158563,0.000034182824,0.00003071422,0.000026100679,0.10292759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981236,0.0007849336,0.000037416565,0.00023285809,0.00034280942,0.00047841595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989189,0.00045974608,0.00015520412,0.00011058435,0.00018171487,0.00017389133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002078704,0.00030392146,0.000274657,0.0006082559,0.0064702355,0.007446423,0.0007152808,0.0028596637,0.0127693545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020984276,0.00020880681,0.00022178952,0.0009158454,0.0109788,0.0035435,0.0032277438,0.0043806145,0.0013441234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002550601,0.000015676153,0.0022269175,0.000045103876,0.0000071387294,0.00017317674,0.020435024,0.00009414765,0.0004342869,0.96033776,0.0036772152,0.012528018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004589515,0.00006797836,0.02012653,0.00072075153,0.000021548076,0.00035021192,0.055677384,0.00035040302,0.0010211639,0.17354572,0.7480261,0.000046477177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040480975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.068140045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040480975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055104187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005044428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08049071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510901266","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i1.4362","title":"ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND THE INSTITUTIONAL LIMITS OF INDEPENDENT COURTS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Judicial independence; Adjudication; Political science; Law; Independence (probability theory); Separation of powers; Commit; Constitutional law; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Legislature; Sociology; Supreme court","score_opus":0.07902777010930453,"score_gpt":0.36232026323610345,"score_spread":0.28329249312679894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1510901266","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16926147,0.009035416,0.003587036,0.0593304,0.00015452011,0.000033184908,0.00012743125,0.000037202568,0.7584333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98935527,0.001957806,0.0004056481,0.001596299,0.000057736146,0.000015279093,0.000021552358,0.000009120935,0.0065812115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894048,0.0020613885,0.00024891712,0.00080253556,0.0038392644,0.0036432059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861604,0.006685631,0.0011164789,0.0011698735,0.0025157449,0.0023517904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005754059,0.00022473735,0.00046460348,0.0027575372,0.02045794,0.014166411,0.0018586419,0.003216209,0.006183377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017804706,0.00039654475,0.00036279266,0.0025097812,0.061674427,0.006091286,0.007389421,0.005544488,0.0002571464],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059824256,0.000012276486,0.0010155295,0.000014157815,0.0000045462048,0.00006542244,0.008016372,0.00013731592,0.0000658886,0.982544,0.0016802051,0.0064381734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045965324,0.000038231818,0.023816124,0.0005298259,0.000049273265,0.00018563024,0.025240788,0.00089045084,0.00029080448,0.74704516,0.20176883,0.000098959645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8293827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87062013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8293827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.049796026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07620895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3612972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512087007","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511551116","title":"Common Law Theory","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Comparative law; Philosophy of law; Constitutionalism; Political science; Political philosophy; Common law; Political law; Legal history; Politics; Legal profession; Public law; Legal realism; Empirical legal studies; Constitutional theory; Democracy; Sources of law; Sociology; Chinese law","score_opus":0.028478074350683148,"score_gpt":0.2447391090112745,"score_spread":0.21626103466059135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1512087007","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019444351,0.008298582,0.06574026,0.016868407,0.0005253985,0.00013373475,0.00017859202,0.00008155341,0.9062291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6302488,0.022452027,0.051047526,0.020575562,0.002845569,0.001226114,0.00079497276,0.00027303252,0.27053642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993437,0.0023429787,0.000313251,0.00126583,0.0020872816,0.00055364287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965132,0.0018942722,0.00022907244,0.00062795996,0.0005417325,0.00019391316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005150978,0.0009168333,0.0009253099,0.0031884264,0.0051400107,0.008469824,0.0025434594,0.0044322982,0.017099746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007994984,0.0003945352,0.0009889648,0.0029121188,0.027661862,0.0099539785,0.004712383,0.0049021943,0.004270002],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.6417612e-7,9.02711e-7,0.000012484034,0.0000065715194,8.891761e-7,0.0000051358975,0.000095144365,0.00004228667,0.0000024710691,0.99762684,0.0013897971,0.0008171053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002272711,0.0000027039991,0.000039277442,0.00006428413,0.0000023746045,0.00004276272,0.00015788904,0.00018085293,0.000017102748,0.9233755,0.07611221,0.0000027098617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054762224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004013271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017099746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0086967535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068806945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06309962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512105164","doi":"","title":"Why is the Japanese Supreme Court so Conservative","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Constitution; Judicial review; Statute; Judicial independence; Judicial activism; Separation of powers; Precedent; Certiorari; Scrutiny; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.07008984514374854,"score_gpt":0.28682574107451697,"score_spread":0.21673589593076842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1512105164","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.309987,0.011218658,0.0045013074,0.40835762,0.002728782,0.000043741482,0.00018003899,0.00015443288,0.26282844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95630586,0.0024474773,0.00081756024,0.026346607,0.00080635026,0.00002139724,0.00006264874,0.00004168875,0.013150408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99580824,0.0008878694,0.00016224006,0.000794389,0.001129858,0.0012172892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99498874,0.0009725646,0.00066879665,0.00028011715,0.0023204929,0.0007692108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053369263,0.00014223641,0.00030339367,0.00091610727,0.007279995,0.008406452,0.00079754,0.0030264147,0.002592276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010001151,0.00028208838,0.00024798242,0.0012244903,0.007913436,0.003002811,0.0014371017,0.0031807944,0.0008119889],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007899273,0.000051890835,0.02972139,0.00019355945,0.00010867645,0.0017627765,0.033013515,0.00032915053,0.0034819872,0.6973772,0.1699544,0.06392648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011689964,0.000084672574,0.09790794,0.00038231054,0.00015524053,0.0008545667,0.05399642,0.000959051,0.0021174715,0.20860255,0.6345919,0.00023092968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060816996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.112336226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060816996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060179033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056456686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12092602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512809894","doi":"","title":"Introduction: The Negotiable Constitution: On the Limitation of Rights","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Legislation; Law; Politics; Fundamental rights; Reservation of rights; Bill of rights; Human rights; Law and economics; Right to property; Sociology","score_opus":0.013468949115893967,"score_gpt":0.24250171957427605,"score_spread":0.22903277045838208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1512809894","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046107215,0.037645172,0.041663658,0.21793365,0.008776338,0.00013662483,0.001154254,0.00023363938,0.6878459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46754858,0.049183805,0.03904588,0.118098125,0.024856003,0.001125611,0.0019773042,0.0008268418,0.2973379],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956436,0.0018499955,0.00018550544,0.0008199908,0.0012282936,0.00027255964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951014,0.0035009813,0.0002475334,0.00039886925,0.00060520065,0.00014603054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037768804,0.00061400124,0.0005083195,0.0014910372,0.004409079,0.008044199,0.0016045001,0.0066573867,0.023484021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010156188,0.0004516011,0.0005668687,0.0022710986,0.018255718,0.010810226,0.0037074517,0.009344579,0.0057457583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053284734,0.0000031312622,0.00004731116,0.00004318816,9.3762253e-7,0.000013762084,0.00065314345,0.000063999796,0.000025465491,0.9680424,0.026872301,0.004229021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008229192,0.00001108982,0.00030404417,0.00044118153,0.000004449501,0.00008747019,0.000416048,0.00020509509,0.00010902277,0.39985183,0.59854585,0.00001572035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051130694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003552644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023484021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004498322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034514023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0785619},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W151487474","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/53.1.125","title":"The Question of Case Selection in Comparative Constitutional Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Constitutional law; Comparative law; Analogy; Political science; Field (mathematics); Comparative politics; Constitutional economics; Politics; Epistemology; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.049900953047995945,"score_gpt":0.3854993611052266,"score_spread":0.3355984080572306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W151487474","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08628046,0.019359607,0.49864754,0.07572087,0.002804063,0.0032803176,0.00056504644,0.00017898042,0.31316304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85420984,0.003622824,0.123218566,0.0075956727,0.001654586,0.0044678766,0.00023835756,0.00008721563,0.0049048904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.71066964,0.26111054,0.004152674,0.010017767,0.011953583,0.0020957557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.70688975,0.26439744,0.0065427343,0.015894555,0.005385719,0.0008898118],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.19061686,0.0006539966,0.001935645,0.0058189468,0.009543119,0.010279745,0.00495118,0.0044700494,0.007322221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2594813,0.0009694586,0.0013266937,0.006521869,0.058700077,0.020418447,0.008294795,0.004773618,0.0006195717],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003318609,0.000024293242,0.0007515185,0.00010559893,0.000023174009,0.00005261757,0.0030376026,0.00017331712,0.000039342158,0.98417217,0.0010406921,0.010546523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007787666,0.000088437315,0.0006674558,0.00037161753,0.00003015958,0.00009093613,0.002430765,0.0011784638,0.00028791142,0.97770476,0.01705113,0.000020396157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022570686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022910729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19061686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006240555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006039705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1515411761","doi":"10.1111/raju.12070","title":"Beyond the Law‐State: The Adequacy of <scp>R</scp>az's Account of Legal Systems in Explaining Intra‐State and Supra‐State Legality","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; State (computer science); Citation; Law; Sociology; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Algorithm","score_opus":0.03164222571396745,"score_gpt":0.28802232252137794,"score_spread":0.2563800968074105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1515411761","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06033349,0.0030151426,0.0759336,0.1411209,0.0004272157,0.00009563894,0.00029316527,0.0002448294,0.71853596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97793955,0.0007428509,0.0068780095,0.005395721,0.0005927467,0.00012202635,0.000045247474,0.000102446706,0.008181485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950111,0.0026960517,0.00013619759,0.00060572015,0.0011240718,0.00042683043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856656,0.011093042,0.0006112075,0.001382844,0.0009724643,0.00027478999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062915385,0.00040143722,0.00073853834,0.0028981888,0.004732356,0.011254166,0.0027980092,0.0065139523,0.007504651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016706958,0.00038640475,0.0009619184,0.002408088,0.040068727,0.014167616,0.0036964882,0.009149516,0.0007754823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017235975,0.0000030855535,0.000036421894,0.000003530722,0.0000011559862,0.0000057907896,0.00023147756,0.00009789391,0.000009135665,0.9986014,0.00053874217,0.00046958725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056288773,0.0000037171908,0.0001597549,0.000014699769,0.00000403652,0.000010867549,0.00019682258,0.0010148119,0.00007031813,0.9939494,0.0045666276,0.000003371815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009141544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007053515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011254166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041382536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051272134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03327322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516339818","doi":"10.24926/19441992.586","title":"Squaring the Circle: Democratizing Judicial Review and the Counter-Constitutional Difficulty","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of international law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Strong; Yale University","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitution; Law; Judicial review; Legislation; Politics; Political science; Legislature; Original meaning; Judicial activism; Power (physics); Separation of powers; Supreme Court Decisions; Sociology; Meaning (existential)","score_opus":0.015825647471893398,"score_gpt":0.29514844867312867,"score_spread":0.27932280120123526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516339818","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04069951,0.019924242,0.04058168,0.69078034,0.003013772,0.00018456693,0.000060864942,0.0004129038,0.20434211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8260905,0.005699091,0.015622067,0.11726808,0.008370649,0.00034613264,0.000045155764,0.0003058437,0.026252616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9208002,0.042443104,0.0028548583,0.010786969,0.01799699,0.0051178276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8236521,0.13471684,0.010991949,0.013716233,0.012414069,0.0045088693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.054275006,0.0005006796,0.0010656066,0.003778844,0.010782044,0.021317434,0.0024945198,0.014468589,0.0057955766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13820715,0.00087311224,0.00076016766,0.0027367782,0.026213588,0.017158631,0.007440544,0.018210743,0.0017962628],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004516505,0.00004557679,0.0010270571,0.00012855862,0.000039109313,0.0002020373,0.0033958966,0.00089814916,0.0005748014,0.92079085,0.034608677,0.038244084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016786311,0.00007019292,0.0015813783,0.00032425628,0.000039263665,0.0002966592,0.0013465709,0.0029396066,0.001160811,0.76673776,0.22522745,0.00010814166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007019117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009624139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054275006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013479711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01635416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28703707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1517822021","doi":"10.1515/9781553394518-012","title":"Looking for the Good Judge: Merit and Ideology","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; nobody; Denial; Ideal (ethics); Tribunal; Law; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Politics; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Psychoanalysis; Computer security","score_opus":0.023605744692776386,"score_gpt":0.2331077510872896,"score_spread":0.20950200639451322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1517822021","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05029888,0.047942687,0.004024879,0.3430881,0.0051867208,0.00002421515,0.000041287592,0.000033422675,0.5493599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9006493,0.011071927,0.002253003,0.018592063,0.0046738144,0.00003428871,0.000029696972,0.00005567906,0.062640175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99627125,0.0020770945,0.000062720756,0.00025103116,0.0006683282,0.000669599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99695766,0.0018235978,0.00036467658,0.000101576974,0.00035786175,0.00039476223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034598755,0.00022275612,0.00035875064,0.0010655249,0.0073395604,0.009371176,0.00076775317,0.004297694,0.002911169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007010896,0.00012874966,0.0002534991,0.0010876438,0.020231992,0.005472196,0.0022086725,0.0050495067,0.00072111114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010967941,0.000011390442,0.0004149651,0.000029864352,0.0000021627602,0.00007379179,0.0073567163,0.000046177774,0.00006645795,0.96346164,0.021237198,0.0072887396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015232693,0.000033475877,0.0021962344,0.00029515423,0.000006740091,0.00013243819,0.009634164,0.00022451539,0.00014315503,0.8183634,0.16893637,0.000019090323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037182483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064635198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009371176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004988441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028814084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036193907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1519110318","doi":"10.24908/fg.v10i1.4575","title":"Book Review: Federalism and the Constitution of Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Governance","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Constitution; Dual federalism; Jurisdiction; Political science; New Federalism; Cooperative federalism; Government (linguistics); Law; Public administration; Sociology; Politics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.007224417011551248,"score_gpt":0.22578234476690123,"score_spread":0.21855792775535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1519110318","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020880435,0.8793161,0.00021615013,0.021098653,0.005448918,0.0000145826,0.0004554111,0.000031427215,0.093210034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007218425,0.9280717,0.00031934102,0.009341257,0.004479892,0.000028508139,0.000603149,0.000043270607,0.049894493],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998725,0.00011827947,0.00003986589,0.000105991065,0.00086311385,0.00014769206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997743,0.0006937792,0.00013850543,0.000055913562,0.0012314307,0.00013750703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063049607,0.0007849004,0.00095363986,0.005544327,0.0030034946,0.0043145837,0.0013241898,0.0021187812,0.023839062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00412187,0.00027768922,0.0003662516,0.019601904,0.0026557294,0.0022432436,0.0008783981,0.0024573386,0.0042384043],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008761507,0.000006128201,0.00010768019,0.00091243215,0.000010784889,0.0000439011,0.00015388272,0.0002118581,0.000038090893,0.03460998,0.90867835,0.055218108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024831888,0.0000018008269,0.00038201956,0.00080280926,0.000006592512,0.00003989318,0.000062621424,0.000021999595,0.000012330454,0.0023770712,0.9962846,0.00000578653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6521405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.77397984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9748025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025197517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048358142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6998162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1519542469","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1064","title":"Institutional Boundaries and Judicial Review: Some Thoughts on How the Court is Going About Its Business: Desperately Seeking Coherence","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Confusion; Consistency (knowledge bases); Ambivalence; Supreme court; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Judicial interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Perspective (graphical); Law; Judicial activism; Law and economics; Judicial review; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.051602250117015504,"score_gpt":0.3085362819581307,"score_spread":0.2569340318411152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1519542469","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015076839,0.051236372,0.041329928,0.804493,0.002061335,0.000097791475,0.000053102227,0.00009580449,0.085555844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88192755,0.022179183,0.024809632,0.05709651,0.0053295074,0.00036271266,0.000049763075,0.00016776087,0.008077488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9054863,0.07091875,0.003598908,0.004517147,0.011492045,0.003986805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8577015,0.10862534,0.0077338615,0.008768817,0.013754411,0.0034159927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08691645,0.00034139448,0.0014121749,0.005280918,0.013028122,0.038731996,0.0033031758,0.01411153,0.002084952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16161387,0.0008137112,0.00089913886,0.0051835845,0.11455846,0.0247449,0.0066329357,0.012504781,0.0004967355],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038269436,0.0000041325225,0.0001349577,0.000033142078,0.000006129803,0.000017641032,0.0020671866,0.00015364253,0.000028489503,0.9914991,0.002144124,0.003907584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021087693,0.000009656161,0.00034097457,0.00027492986,0.000006793762,0.00002410827,0.0023925132,0.000255576,0.00006688738,0.95563835,0.04094239,0.000026663522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02642187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022409976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08691645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015245901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034481835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45966357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1522585872","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1060","title":"Principled Remedial Discretion Under the Charter","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Discretion; Remedial education; Jurisdiction; Law; Supreme court; Judicial discretion; Political science; Government (linguistics); Dissent; Judicial review; Politics","score_opus":0.04585485366702277,"score_gpt":0.32392649519547284,"score_spread":0.2780716415284501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1522585872","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04595047,0.0020902155,0.14186527,0.026853126,0.000803055,0.0004146965,0.00027718,0.00039775608,0.7813482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9023876,0.00060879474,0.04159309,0.0057120197,0.00063560705,0.0003726435,0.00008302035,0.00007323006,0.048533868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9737476,0.0067144088,0.0012408148,0.003590446,0.011723992,0.0029827617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838838,0.00666354,0.0015812502,0.0045307293,0.0027576454,0.00058295205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015338586,0.00042193048,0.00065590447,0.0012403824,0.0035130305,0.009796578,0.002204665,0.0062617846,0.0042114505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02355943,0.00050991395,0.0009076604,0.0008120377,0.017910281,0.0055012046,0.0031458552,0.010036399,0.0009431991],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043967643,0.0000059920153,0.00008184286,0.0000076138854,0.0000017935358,0.000021329124,0.00025747434,0.00032086807,0.00012505706,0.9953957,0.0010379256,0.0027399873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003317588,0.00006448096,0.00061418395,0.00010887978,0.00001249091,0.00011301199,0.00019367652,0.002032743,0.00075009034,0.93234694,0.06365845,0.00007184945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0097628515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012921002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015338586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005774979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012795282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08111918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1523577258","doi":"","title":"Out of Many: Military Commissions, Religious Tribunals, and the Democratic Virtues of Court Specialization","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Democracy; Legitimacy; Deliberation; Legal pluralism; Rule of law; Pluralism (philosophy); Sociology; Politics; Comparative law; Legal realism","score_opus":0.008635424669849562,"score_gpt":0.2695451852837681,"score_spread":0.2609097606139185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1523577258","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5292,0.002360658,0.012141103,0.048125006,0.0002315289,0.000036466787,0.000038824244,0.000060478727,0.4078059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99547344,0.00015420382,0.00035317775,0.0008520489,0.00005514538,0.0000047664103,0.0000062625627,0.000008862078,0.0030920794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932045,0.003462216,0.00019518996,0.0008185743,0.0010995746,0.0012199355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99062234,0.004473758,0.0014629442,0.0013034093,0.0005841291,0.0015534274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006631978,0.00013922856,0.00028589685,0.001030646,0.011542971,0.012210518,0.0008114112,0.001987883,0.0036237903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012676474,0.00025524627,0.0002427461,0.0013839897,0.034475025,0.006671791,0.007843429,0.0035226734,0.00033510276],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023919549,0.000020127496,0.0076935445,0.000026662869,0.000009130013,0.0002161482,0.047281895,0.00027570318,0.00031079512,0.9159881,0.003282133,0.024871914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003478136,0.000064995496,0.032268442,0.00028630794,0.00003152613,0.0006100399,0.102066495,0.0012906886,0.0011897266,0.66305,0.19905968,0.00004739412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009022821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022181647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012210518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004394975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00511063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035073698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1523621806","doi":"10.29173/alr1426","title":"Dialogue and Hierarchy in Charter Interpretation: A Comment on R. v. Mills","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Charter; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Legislature; Interpretation (philosophy); Hierarchy; Compromise; Law and economics; Legislation; Democracy; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028757525045556655,"score_gpt":0.3115379742702495,"score_spread":0.2827804492246928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1523621806","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002566163,0.0068177455,0.0005952299,0.96806794,0.0041969274,0.00003638927,0.00005559389,0.00005920615,0.017604783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.034217305,0.0024085077,0.0006361086,0.94091415,0.0059410282,0.00014124307,0.000019809111,0.00007521736,0.015646601],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9659246,0.013028433,0.0015208245,0.0056382488,0.009203564,0.0046842704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9615368,0.03306722,0.001412074,0.00080163294,0.0021759958,0.0010062538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030610874,0.0012101468,0.0022528577,0.0016328449,0.020392826,0.015120747,0.011770992,0.09024939,0.0050103366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05320706,0.0019857122,0.0027172603,0.0033957877,0.02487925,0.010876837,0.005192848,0.058329053,0.0018020587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053403608,0.000037714428,0.00034714417,0.00020196158,0.000018291748,0.0010341385,0.0066058836,0.00027645382,0.0001990701,0.29361108,0.69004965,0.007565151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010775499,0.00013652004,0.0017883283,0.0009666918,0.000067298555,0.00054600305,0.008950202,0.00061571767,0.0006901303,0.07503633,0.91088486,0.00021025675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.104032196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12737057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.104032196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01629329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021308362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20685333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1524833258","doi":"10.21991/c93h36","title":"Charter Checks and Parliamentary Balances","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Separation of powers; Orthodoxy; Law; Law and economics; Oxymoron; Power (physics); Democracy; Enumerated powers; Dictatorship; Political science; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0396831487486355,"score_gpt":0.26670781022178597,"score_spread":0.22702466147315048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1524833258","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.063180596,0.0029214302,0.012030718,0.023780717,0.00077616144,0.000085622,0.00026713827,0.00017019396,0.8967875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9500484,0.0007315848,0.0022741414,0.0025698217,0.00025665347,0.000058874837,0.00008668902,0.000065224536,0.043908697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98656285,0.0036389825,0.00043226226,0.0014718312,0.0048036035,0.0030905665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894342,0.0041844724,0.001595678,0.0012981559,0.002840949,0.00064663216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010147674,0.00033461498,0.00047307328,0.002963818,0.009853489,0.011154491,0.0015879067,0.0026169082,0.009207647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031907603,0.0003742866,0.0002824673,0.0028904811,0.025294028,0.0056566726,0.0036957716,0.004243096,0.00071386714],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006463817,0.0000020080306,0.0001566377,0.0000063436096,0.0000012375108,0.000008488023,0.000740353,0.00009894413,0.000040539457,0.99471045,0.0015592522,0.0026691896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006588972,0.000039308023,0.0059207906,0.00024907567,0.000028832012,0.000050117986,0.0028626567,0.0009997191,0.0012048248,0.6362653,0.35223913,0.00007440027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17388403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20380253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98154104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018458955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024297606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34574383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526254867","doi":"","title":"Rethinking Constitutional Review in America and the Commonwealth: Judicial Protection of Human Rights in the Common Law World","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Commonwealth; Constitutional law; Human rights; Constitutional review; Common law; Legislature; Judicial review; Status quo; Law and economics; Constitution; Economics","score_opus":0.04724753637126665,"score_gpt":0.3201431300213977,"score_spread":0.27289559365013105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526254867","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038285136,0.116137594,0.012357655,0.60425395,0.005099112,0.00009684713,0.00006838688,0.00008721725,0.22361407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87443316,0.023802275,0.0046566366,0.07616514,0.0046479846,0.00010429833,0.000036658836,0.000059718048,0.01609414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.956636,0.026768982,0.0013331197,0.0028389103,0.008320659,0.004102317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8975076,0.084965244,0.0028774643,0.0029691276,0.009025459,0.0026551],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046444133,0.0002830588,0.0005748807,0.0039637345,0.012396726,0.02192233,0.0020433033,0.01186401,0.0016841816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07857659,0.00053244975,0.00046150445,0.0039181514,0.04628074,0.013289367,0.0056132455,0.009554516,0.00018833196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007051318,0.0000060214093,0.00039520187,0.000049267066,0.00000824653,0.000066587425,0.004482426,0.00015017662,0.00010967015,0.9687482,0.0132944165,0.012682663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036635647,0.000040826548,0.003681659,0.0006096129,0.000036303987,0.000115484465,0.007151366,0.0008252095,0.00046063744,0.52636343,0.46059713,0.000081704304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12855546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26025736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12855546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028311227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04605708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2556144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526980826","doi":"","title":"THE REAL CASE FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW: A PLEA FOR NON- INSTRUMENTALIST JUSTIFICATION IN CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Judicial review; Grievance; Law and economics; Political science; Judicial deference; Democracy; Plea; Law; Constitutional theory; Judicial activism; Deference; Constitution; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019165039572884904,"score_gpt":0.327045633449607,"score_spread":0.3078805938767221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526980826","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009675791,0.015257715,0.05740433,0.78578717,0.0034657407,0.0001228167,0.00005320035,0.00008348656,0.12814976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75245935,0.008175056,0.03369538,0.16884749,0.015417147,0.0009076789,0.00006763268,0.00017233328,0.020257996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9180167,0.05265446,0.00253804,0.0071909274,0.01609516,0.003504635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7973189,0.17037585,0.0072282506,0.011950775,0.009751557,0.0033746357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10355517,0.000570862,0.0016685344,0.0030685514,0.0075407326,0.01617226,0.0040635634,0.029004913,0.0056298035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13569264,0.00078596175,0.0015598647,0.0015749295,0.06537396,0.02300078,0.0062178792,0.02431683,0.001254362],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006017895,0.000009464464,0.00006746967,0.000031801803,0.000004917489,0.000034183948,0.00016814412,0.00012180883,0.000024761317,0.99544805,0.0027226,0.0013606405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057077068,0.000018273502,0.00011493306,0.00016412497,0.000005820301,0.00006249099,0.00015744372,0.0006475338,0.000065445114,0.9607534,0.03793209,0.000021225287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021309096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021768888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10355517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008863158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011196503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5476587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1527035681","doi":"","title":"CONSTITUTIONAL PRECEDENTS IN JAPAN: A COMMENT ON THE ROLE OF PRECEDENT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Adjudication; Original jurisdiction; Precedent; Statute; Majority opinion; Judicial independence; De facto","score_opus":0.055790909303025125,"score_gpt":0.2793036715084343,"score_spread":0.2235127622054092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1527035681","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042147186,0.018500078,0.004523852,0.7237505,0.004049638,0.000051921692,0.00022115713,0.00007785677,0.20667785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58956337,0.012500826,0.0034665547,0.34977216,0.008340159,0.00015153205,0.00014666245,0.00012042446,0.035938274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962135,0.0008992526,0.00036653408,0.0007359963,0.00096004235,0.000824679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98998684,0.006646168,0.0008014038,0.00047067748,0.0016261921,0.00046875264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007866098,0.00039144108,0.0006883328,0.00097610895,0.012908881,0.0054915347,0.002717865,0.01573174,0.0034114022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012054325,0.00066653744,0.0012899517,0.0020976788,0.019474385,0.0086584175,0.003651196,0.014855649,0.00048424496],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000201688,0.00001154335,0.00083298405,0.00012047136,0.000008876714,0.00070179213,0.008474692,0.00015554689,0.00033871105,0.9527927,0.03347257,0.0030698734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011933356,0.00007830618,0.011005157,0.00078653,0.00013722351,0.00067161274,0.012126974,0.00079610007,0.0011233247,0.20406015,0.76892084,0.00017445853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13107257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1728711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13107257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012027675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013382741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26061928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1527938502","doi":"10.21991/c9538k","title":"Applying the Burden of Proof and Creating Connections to Communities","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Burden of proof; Arbitrariness; Proof of concept; Epistemology; Law and economics; Sociology; Economic Justice; Computer science; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04185386996911755,"score_gpt":0.2998754247963839,"score_spread":0.25802155482726635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1527938502","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04430354,0.005218856,0.34548795,0.28966168,0.0021279554,0.0003679817,0.00010922944,0.0002022565,0.31252053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9306589,0.0014082497,0.04633018,0.008709915,0.0012791805,0.0005271648,0.000033069642,0.00012928435,0.010924182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.91258794,0.06484564,0.002846685,0.006331459,0.009978692,0.0034096346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8371031,0.12021189,0.008233008,0.023254625,0.007725483,0.00347188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09715951,0.0010765089,0.0017944974,0.004964032,0.013178001,0.023623258,0.004964652,0.019359194,0.009559164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16801535,0.0012452399,0.0015134058,0.0019064621,0.12110245,0.059781924,0.03096122,0.0196334,0.001112398],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000299634,0.0000028550244,0.000047166322,0.000010935997,0.0000028535599,0.00003199045,0.0015482759,0.00006884639,0.000025873325,0.99675876,0.00041969906,0.0010798158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000999883,0.000006958733,0.000033513592,0.000067413916,0.000004288595,0.000044921184,0.00081142056,0.00028656967,0.000098847486,0.98610234,0.012524353,0.000009400586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001948701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013438783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09715951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007048581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008558371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5138347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1529043408","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1260","title":"Sharpening the Dialogue Debate: The Next Decade of Scholarship","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Oxford; Queen's University; McGill University","keywords":"Charter; Constitutionality; Constitutionalism; Scholarship; Legislature; Constitution; Law; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Judicial review; Relation (database); Focus (optics); Constitutional law; Sociology; Law and economics; Democracy; Philosophy; Politics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.07500833982761843,"score_gpt":0.3243688705626575,"score_spread":0.24936053073503908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1529043408","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014643221,0.5042645,0.0030403072,0.41301444,0.008022566,0.000016670252,0.000051316172,0.000055556753,0.056891456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5227552,0.35129523,0.0035356914,0.085645944,0.025981398,0.00013839411,0.000116069794,0.0000947747,0.010437325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867562,0.0089025805,0.00044203602,0.0010987626,0.001410536,0.0013898468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9434733,0.048465703,0.0020467055,0.0015951734,0.002463026,0.0019560303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018968917,0.00052287406,0.0016581393,0.005446337,0.009386891,0.028790854,0.0026980413,0.015920587,0.009289523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024291972,0.00046656714,0.0006950327,0.008234754,0.055132926,0.03969641,0.00819746,0.016568065,0.0010476037],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046361685,0.00008933764,0.00025935355,0.0009009197,0.000012095022,0.000109664405,0.03286644,0.000135658,0.00010678508,0.9081535,0.01409863,0.04322136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027735665,0.00005867593,0.000685688,0.004129037,0.00001580742,0.00016371012,0.076483816,0.0002968337,0.00016052669,0.46657926,0.45136535,0.000033582473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006198571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006920141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028790854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014261393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01619743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10347414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1530421939","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v8n2p88","title":"The Guardian of the Turkish Constitution: A Special Court","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Constitutional economics; Constitutional review; Political science; Law; Constitutional court; Constitution; Liberal democracy; Democracy; Legislature; Constitutional law; Turkish; Judicial review; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03268979629139716,"score_gpt":0.295123636449888,"score_spread":0.2624338401584908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1530421939","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30826044,0.018684193,0.008376429,0.0737336,0.0030410513,0.00018998315,0.00040635516,0.00013426112,0.5871737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9607864,0.0012988594,0.0015236085,0.0032508513,0.00029708684,0.000033691533,0.00008786569,0.000021627824,0.032700032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756134,0.00072366436,0.00018004989,0.00051002286,0.00041733144,0.0006076533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984475,0.00051330024,0.00019222278,0.00016786801,0.0005073581,0.00017179153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002491509,0.00018214538,0.00020914874,0.0010533314,0.0039421157,0.006496928,0.00070003996,0.0034196426,0.004509913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004751773,0.0002279033,0.00020887674,0.0007748278,0.0034371498,0.0034000506,0.0017327467,0.0023142693,0.00072202296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059501683,0.000018613951,0.0022521897,0.00007342049,0.0000076287392,0.001351866,0.0038404076,0.0002459378,0.00083842874,0.93505716,0.022053696,0.034201123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059205646,0.00010360151,0.011868399,0.00025410284,0.00007890748,0.0017418716,0.0064899507,0.0017217104,0.0017260975,0.09217522,0.88366807,0.000112828995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014347924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020160723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014347924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005607414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076783374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04068482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1531936656","doi":"10.26686/wgtn.17006857","title":"Mandatory pre-enactment review of legislation; or should only one government branch be responsible for the protection of rights in the United States?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Judicial review; Order (exchange); Government (linguistics); Law; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.08245029498750828,"score_gpt":0.3566531621127831,"score_spread":0.2742028671252748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1531936656","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33483192,0.016980756,0.018679628,0.21999763,0.0016946144,0.0002888801,0.00012890673,0.00019427674,0.40720335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95757806,0.0020409215,0.0059447954,0.01659695,0.0002720611,0.00010342458,0.000034019005,0.000022763044,0.017406946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97100854,0.016285058,0.0017108377,0.003340147,0.0044876924,0.0031677105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9449641,0.03385363,0.006342784,0.0052201273,0.007817347,0.0018020064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028207408,0.00015971855,0.00030922535,0.00081472134,0.0058303704,0.0069335965,0.0012070201,0.005228658,0.0022929758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045275904,0.0004679916,0.00039870973,0.0007264851,0.0074927057,0.0052875397,0.0029184255,0.004883906,0.00047133156],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006307185,0.0001392704,0.012711228,0.0003636651,0.000027941773,0.00047696818,0.015346428,0.00061447517,0.0028375124,0.83390427,0.029256003,0.10425922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010100609,0.00058414455,0.13286096,0.002451261,0.00018157254,0.0009767665,0.025817042,0.0021537784,0.011146542,0.16915756,0.65429866,0.00027075625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015902227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034821942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028207408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004208576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015174185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14917684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535369152","doi":"10.21991/c9c09s","title":"The Constitution Act, 1982: the Foreseen and Unforeseen","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Writ; Law; Delegation; Political science; Repatriation; Economic Justice; Prime minister; Work (physics); Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.03976722809875146,"score_gpt":0.2728279921872436,"score_spread":0.2330607640884921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1535369152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052491356,0.06993153,0.0010687205,0.3577137,0.0069025736,0.0001042077,0.0047964426,0.00014873677,0.5068426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33776718,0.030009577,0.002538333,0.08740494,0.001999378,0.00047565377,0.0022782236,0.00012521367,0.5374015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99580777,0.0008646472,0.0001954824,0.00045886546,0.0018686526,0.00080460584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963954,0.0015118466,0.00028774407,0.00030510488,0.0010518959,0.00044797163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003999456,0.0005061984,0.00038211409,0.0014838518,0.0069421125,0.010091987,0.0010447527,0.0084132245,0.010080033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014813899,0.0005682394,0.00023169504,0.0050534946,0.006682205,0.004849674,0.0029663201,0.008451079,0.003535923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007547717,0.000045606786,0.002488281,0.00019360686,0.000010510218,0.00038939915,0.005655716,0.00032621593,0.0006653031,0.5904097,0.3607082,0.039031968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024655961,0.000016322632,0.015807228,0.0004790384,0.00001114899,0.000066116496,0.0026804165,0.00011312068,0.00023980533,0.019744739,0.96078485,0.00003246691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3012111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57312804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97909003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020909987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03902783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5989157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1536010178","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100000454","title":"Miriam Smith Political Institutions and Lesbian and Gay Rights in the United States and Canada. New York: Routledge, 2008, 244 p.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Lesbian; Gay rights; Politics; Gender studies; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.05348297282524636,"score_gpt":0.27064297974152857,"score_spread":0.2171600069162822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1536010178","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013135322,0.868442,0.00027674297,0.08031311,0.0014639816,0.000026659416,0.0008675126,0.000045701952,0.04725069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05333356,0.8027674,0.0013697692,0.010830075,0.001604392,0.0001111531,0.0006038293,0.000111516245,0.12926826],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993025,0.00013038269,0.00003808386,0.00007839119,0.0003263258,0.0001243245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864537,0.0005188538,0.00009592965,0.000036898426,0.0004987082,0.00020424768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001023254,0.0014641129,0.0008061766,0.0038395696,0.00909446,0.0050417366,0.0018750224,0.004201733,0.015455736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028053776,0.0010407383,0.00034904902,0.008326131,0.005218717,0.0067257695,0.0015209494,0.0040549524,0.002962605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022436472,0.00002212852,0.00071348675,0.0004115504,0.0000133179265,0.00015200596,0.0074755666,0.00017328827,0.000066441964,0.058332328,0.8768668,0.055750422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011368025,0.0000066395223,0.009479767,0.0015311217,0.000015575664,0.0001163015,0.008799371,0.00012415877,0.000099677934,0.016237477,0.9635438,0.000034810015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92777056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97735256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.072229445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030418152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040913273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22070014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1541692914","doi":"","title":"'Officers of the Commonwealth' in the Private Sector: Can the High Court Review Outsourced Exercises of Power?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; High Court; Law; Charter; Political science; Scope (computer science); Consistency (knowledge bases); Context (archaeology); Public administration","score_opus":0.013352696088358824,"score_gpt":0.26142973378837,"score_spread":0.24807703770001116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1541692914","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28039482,0.0037508665,0.02243241,0.100373775,0.00084198103,0.00031136486,0.00010186236,0.000117303025,0.5916757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9529341,0.0006555496,0.00151484,0.009065632,0.00038422176,0.00009323402,0.000019657477,0.000043075815,0.03528971],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9686193,0.012050982,0.0010163252,0.0028460314,0.008728783,0.0067385384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9625857,0.019770646,0.0022497056,0.005027133,0.0072358586,0.0031309733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025399707,0.00023642124,0.0006200499,0.0014754653,0.010361427,0.01958298,0.002171092,0.0047947234,0.006374437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05641013,0.0006140571,0.0004340945,0.0018127201,0.022607649,0.012009778,0.0081222765,0.0065177795,0.0009857198],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029124532,0.000031599615,0.0040821345,0.000041209227,0.00001788137,0.0002767236,0.015481169,0.00033715658,0.000459204,0.942262,0.011808899,0.0251729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011925744,0.00021125152,0.023200462,0.00073308,0.00010828875,0.0004082186,0.04002653,0.0021568346,0.0018980181,0.4085812,0.5223744,0.0001824596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.107334614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16596608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.107334614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015319324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041857142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21341974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1541830738","doi":"","title":"Transnational Perspectives on the U.S. Transnational Law Controversy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Law; Constitutional theory; Political science; Constitutional law; Jurisprudence; Adjudication; Constitution; Legitimacy; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.048953891855240884,"score_gpt":0.27501075771657224,"score_spread":0.22605686586133136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1541830738","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04720665,0.05882954,0.0020817635,0.30182052,0.0027860831,0.000011138774,0.000075398304,0.000038326678,0.58715063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87931234,0.023974571,0.0015310466,0.05678336,0.0015943272,0.000065470995,0.000071887174,0.00008472609,0.03658226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99713564,0.001569024,0.00008077683,0.0002902739,0.00037206663,0.00055211945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807066,0.0011008037,0.00015259086,0.00014294955,0.00021377625,0.00031925828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036662281,0.0004440748,0.0005499953,0.0017820386,0.0146308,0.014941983,0.0010258538,0.0075778686,0.008924449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027282112,0.0002514614,0.0007401377,0.0030062317,0.014419403,0.010429503,0.005643549,0.008289027,0.0006688008],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000084496605,0.000013224307,0.00025423768,0.000037470138,0.00000444656,0.00024660272,0.010000521,0.00007346638,0.00008307534,0.97357607,0.011355031,0.0043473463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013358839,0.000030316804,0.0017664917,0.0007037033,0.000025902194,0.00044158904,0.056185484,0.00045766117,0.00016328406,0.2626206,0.6775632,0.00002847204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0202895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0434478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0202895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009035808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039017345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065559685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542311799","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004689","title":"A Reply to Critics of Constitutional Goods","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Constitutional law; Politics; Philosophy; Law and economics; Political science; Art history; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.044947234081025564,"score_gpt":0.3842785798834956,"score_spread":0.33933134580247004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1542311799","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00052646326,0.0026678126,0.00038148728,0.98343635,0.0032642647,0.0000027245885,0.000015236545,0.000013753076,0.009691959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07069421,0.0052791615,0.0006885577,0.8850786,0.02310639,0.000048773254,0.000040455892,0.00024295165,0.014820825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9678861,0.014491536,0.0011903453,0.0038939551,0.010297243,0.0022407318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8984462,0.08237129,0.00275772,0.003922999,0.010018628,0.0024831733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03292738,0.0009525238,0.0018341901,0.0025987457,0.012692645,0.01551837,0.005114554,0.047503367,0.01054385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11204143,0.0008696466,0.0012998669,0.004490313,0.061331768,0.028360145,0.010230349,0.06039998,0.0022870686],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024880022,0.000009964597,0.00022083877,0.00010044767,0.0000122726415,0.00013271262,0.005129485,0.0001441984,0.0000392962,0.5704135,0.4187025,0.0050698337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043201835,0.00001538832,0.0003561846,0.0005624097,0.000015034802,0.00015642289,0.0076758275,0.00025367504,0.00016429226,0.2697626,0.7209408,0.000054207037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012960635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047503367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011905252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009443473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17413872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542365935","doi":"","title":"A Comparative Assessment of the Politics of Judicial Retirement in Canada and the United Kingdom","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mandatory retirement; Supreme court; Kingdom; Politics; Law; Test (biology); Political science; Service (business); Economics","score_opus":0.03916541946233784,"score_gpt":0.3279730185603466,"score_spread":0.2888075990980088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1542365935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9666518,0.0031527097,0.00016454639,0.0036847629,0.00004147023,0.000016382384,0.0003942261,0.000007426457,0.02588676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974292,0.00068891223,0.000050407492,0.00017216172,0.00000540671,0.0000022723502,0.000084392756,0.0000031830757,0.0015640471],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99570364,0.0004998779,0.00012124327,0.00032636902,0.0011621258,0.0021867112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882764,0.0021004905,0.0020051405,0.00032205984,0.0046065967,0.002689274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021412189,0.00013805306,0.00041980995,0.0033728757,0.00714768,0.0034695035,0.00088793103,0.0007232825,0.003661208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013055655,0.00021130915,0.0002997189,0.00522776,0.0033840388,0.0007821233,0.0018181413,0.0010155588,0.0001844524],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005772184,0.00007451536,0.7636405,0.00023885882,0.0001834399,0.0018384944,0.04688168,0.0023291917,0.0010612364,0.09564592,0.016902225,0.07062672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023433957,0.000031626838,0.9219438,0.00022761033,0.00004544758,0.00021520034,0.043464914,0.0006796349,0.00032236986,0.000868545,0.03210597,0.00007141206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98256785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99510974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060854316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.060854316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042145208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.441531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1545588899","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1183","title":"The Constitutional Status of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Supreme court; Law; Statute; Parliamentary sovereignty; Political science; Parliament; Sovereign immunity; Separation of powers; Politics","score_opus":0.03048684956872575,"score_gpt":0.2914957824644766,"score_spread":0.26100893289575083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1545588899","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03416292,0.008593539,0.0014509995,0.042972606,0.0007832379,0.00006887411,0.0010490761,0.00007157302,0.91084725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9030325,0.004888509,0.0014592352,0.012451112,0.0005282027,0.00007156747,0.00057295844,0.00004766635,0.0769482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.990571,0.00089688366,0.00024278743,0.0013316773,0.0037476544,0.0032099793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99250025,0.0017805954,0.00037424566,0.00035670336,0.0037650834,0.0012231517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037080385,0.00029842442,0.00050631823,0.0027180586,0.019822424,0.015201371,0.0018670567,0.0036155959,0.011905808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014982215,0.0005018758,0.00037339958,0.004264993,0.013359189,0.0031146633,0.0024944854,0.0064807734,0.00079425535],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008026094,0.0000029228313,0.0005500224,0.000014372089,0.0000058263636,0.000048962756,0.00082705624,0.000062366904,0.000070383765,0.981233,0.013330202,0.0038468752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057013458,0.000020730118,0.011429769,0.0006165266,0.00009198755,0.0000799891,0.0026673118,0.0009042045,0.0004400034,0.2203199,0.76323164,0.00014084305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94757855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96808404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.094563894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.094563894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1138581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6861123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552243689","doi":"10.21991/c9037n","title":"Disputed Election Results: A More Rigorous \"Magic Number Test\"","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Democracy; Political science; General election; Government (linguistics); Law; Faith; Public administration; Politics; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014966732551563122,"score_gpt":0.2775262897633366,"score_spread":0.2625595572117735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1552243689","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17766225,0.009855783,0.19691478,0.19949464,0.013727034,0.00230692,0.0024602017,0.00038765892,0.39719075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87239623,0.0010137865,0.06332593,0.045144357,0.0059862,0.002137666,0.00061530323,0.00024774633,0.00913272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6620806,0.23694366,0.01353589,0.019680873,0.06310479,0.004654184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.20105806,0.73190594,0.016687725,0.027484225,0.020442082,0.0024219034],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.23887822,0.0014835374,0.003640844,0.008375225,0.0063501825,0.013420398,0.009317889,0.0126153175,0.024789242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6215555,0.0007580435,0.0036606516,0.005780123,0.036465943,0.039274402,0.012001757,0.018854482,0.0022526241],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051515934,0.0003251177,0.0075149355,0.00045605586,0.0002442084,0.0003402846,0.0016111963,0.000562112,0.00023047769,0.94576144,0.014845251,0.02759379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015846747,0.0017984884,0.009454799,0.0013891831,0.0006162916,0.00065323216,0.0030945898,0.010546203,0.0016293322,0.8857669,0.08320069,0.0002656154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002035715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017785735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23887822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004284093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006378902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93859863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552697023","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511781490.009","title":"Judicial review, legislative override, and democracy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Democracy; Law; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.028133680037021012,"score_gpt":0.24669325094251995,"score_spread":0.21855957090549893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1552697023","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01191655,0.032637496,0.002171839,0.056721516,0.0008206262,0.00003275159,0.000047772504,0.000026080786,0.89562535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7785134,0.021035627,0.0014258771,0.024636297,0.0030753014,0.00013100222,0.00007363438,0.00006722612,0.17104168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9799604,0.008491135,0.00038757347,0.001515764,0.00690958,0.0027354865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98691803,0.008073997,0.0010238221,0.0012046086,0.0023995957,0.00038000752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011974901,0.00021052225,0.00054535485,0.0012933728,0.006681999,0.0077704825,0.0013499279,0.0038826154,0.005245789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026899634,0.0003127115,0.00027075136,0.0023834694,0.01865718,0.004000787,0.0026939465,0.0050462303,0.0010082105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002850921,0.0000067445812,0.00008371299,0.000018284363,0.0000017409457,0.000024386161,0.0009636331,0.000088176785,0.000023980378,0.97742176,0.015729237,0.0056355833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030164061,0.000018813214,0.0012975091,0.000329606,0.000010668637,0.00007449127,0.0016656835,0.000390103,0.00021116782,0.5979296,0.39802197,0.000020182553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03902901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.055469055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03902901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009596269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021055825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07760364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553021964","doi":"","title":"Weak Constitutionalism: Democratic Legitimacy and the Question of Constituent Power","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":166,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Democracy; Legitimacy; Political science; Legislature; Constitutional theory; Politics; Power (physics); Law and economics; Law; Separation of powers; Sociology","score_opus":0.020473838380557663,"score_gpt":0.295831323279422,"score_spread":0.27535748489886436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1553021964","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01690604,0.010182573,0.03682168,0.06875202,0.0013622358,0.00005957425,0.00005561214,0.00007689985,0.8657834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8696571,0.006238728,0.008245624,0.0076910425,0.0023489606,0.00021989262,0.000089509536,0.00021242352,0.105296664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99346644,0.003357238,0.00020466767,0.0006074797,0.0018665361,0.0004976027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899273,0.007588374,0.00040997544,0.00095025066,0.0008342822,0.00028988498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066274335,0.00034843697,0.0005233303,0.0014197965,0.005197799,0.009615635,0.0013121344,0.0024263796,0.00411227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015294443,0.00029778152,0.00036020216,0.0019208996,0.03871413,0.0139331175,0.0045709275,0.007617038,0.0007908873],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010263577,0.0000017345317,0.000024786534,0.000006458497,8.22551e-7,0.000008444565,0.0006097929,0.000044526754,0.000019647781,0.9964504,0.0011600852,0.0016722123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043044083,0.0000035028115,0.0000752308,0.000029200968,0.0000019928787,0.000013919522,0.0003001064,0.00018984578,0.000064155225,0.9566362,0.0426787,0.0000027206188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026818272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027876731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009615635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005890689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004432984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042740107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553681044","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i3.2278","title":"Wigmore's Chart Method","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Argument (complex analysis); Dialectic; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Perspective (graphical); Rhetoric; Chart; Tree diagram; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Linguistics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03943531913906263,"score_gpt":0.33678029571594514,"score_spread":0.2973449765768825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1553681044","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002147981,0.00036435857,0.9317085,0.0017473564,0.00040535608,0.00055470585,0.0009873275,0.001443586,0.060640894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06266848,0.0007629481,0.9028816,0.0005525647,0.00018655029,0.0014012129,0.0008532578,0.00064482965,0.030048499],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911805,0.0046538827,0.0005290569,0.0014467703,0.0018827827,0.000307004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98739725,0.006491408,0.0006012189,0.0028792638,0.0023610082,0.00026982877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077677397,0.000780424,0.00058464013,0.0051639914,0.002316975,0.006344556,0.002249333,0.001803751,0.024550037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034991577,0.00060781516,0.00092651014,0.0063215583,0.0054478226,0.011038368,0.0032461933,0.0024974057,0.005394797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030840405,0.000016305326,0.0002605712,0.00012558328,0.0000073405117,0.000028954399,0.0012395724,0.00051974744,0.00029835,0.86757034,0.01829693,0.11160542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038294595,0.00003097478,0.00034426074,0.00023448496,0.000021556429,0.00010199978,0.00063240423,0.007915136,0.00158369,0.56221014,0.42684427,0.000042785574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053322483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005870863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024550037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028184578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052515054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08212811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553724378","doi":"","title":"Rule of Beliefs: Constitutional Conventions and the Rule of Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rule of law; Law; Political science; Legislature; Public law; Due process; Law and economics; Private law; Constitutional law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.011350601420818748,"score_gpt":0.2609643936043941,"score_spread":0.24961379218357535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1553724378","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0383601,0.011392493,0.09582971,0.067979306,0.0007561309,0.00009787964,0.00025938055,0.00018874298,0.7851362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9526158,0.0024131224,0.014680215,0.00543368,0.0007471688,0.00016441774,0.00010345595,0.00008741325,0.023754846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896493,0.0054970863,0.00043922808,0.0016221841,0.0017003603,0.0010918659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897816,0.0060315398,0.0010364411,0.001827909,0.0009396813,0.00038278097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009939229,0.00036822562,0.0005479468,0.0015139565,0.0041733687,0.012062066,0.0017242269,0.0055458476,0.004200554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014506211,0.00030066853,0.0005721432,0.0016139614,0.053848963,0.013240765,0.0035665315,0.006222743,0.00075865776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013180149,0.0000013239157,0.000031965184,0.0000041890025,8.564488e-7,0.000007002212,0.00045222876,0.00006322959,0.000010254237,0.9983108,0.0002962724,0.0008204541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056848007,0.000004007836,0.00009304154,0.000030546955,0.0000018716742,0.000016263768,0.00022896196,0.00015923855,0.0000369931,0.9858255,0.013591959,0.0000059745016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010526603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059216614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012062066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005676307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003867849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052564263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1555250870","doi":"","title":"The New Constitutionalism and the Judicialization of Pure Politics Worldwide","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Politics; Legitimacy; Political science; Public sphere; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Judicial review; Law; Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.016257660610434908,"score_gpt":0.3098850748993388,"score_spread":0.2936274142889039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1555250870","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21402366,0.0074162204,0.008005058,0.026696445,0.00019562902,0.000022190397,0.000034595043,0.000027570397,0.74357855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99309945,0.0006348862,0.0003112486,0.00047022398,0.00010663131,0.00000984418,0.000007035734,0.000012715245,0.0053478894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99436235,0.0032090724,0.0001430694,0.00082743645,0.000810517,0.0006475024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948348,0.0030465215,0.00055474765,0.0008818652,0.0004000693,0.00028209042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062918006,0.00014768532,0.0003988116,0.002021377,0.0059661567,0.012527418,0.00080087344,0.0019575553,0.0055560656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010524254,0.00017546996,0.00020896456,0.0017701532,0.050359264,0.011160815,0.0047607296,0.0036637052,0.00025351628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022355532,0.0000019741467,0.000070732225,0.0000057075417,9.612244e-7,0.0000129508635,0.003404577,0.000031726762,0.00005187267,0.9946991,0.00019924823,0.0015189458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014724405,0.00002103497,0.0025031595,0.00012221224,0.000006455976,0.00012014449,0.011407263,0.00034288675,0.00029594539,0.87449855,0.11065436,0.000013338114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031566983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055265725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012527418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006194481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003085739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044944346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1556299623","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1260","title":"Access to Charter Justice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Economic Justice; Political science; Business; Civil rights; Affect (linguistics); Quality (philosophy); Procedural justice; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.07897038468263232,"score_gpt":0.36867579891541974,"score_spread":0.2897054142327874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1556299623","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07275463,0.0038227092,0.0022268957,0.08889888,0.00041300224,0.00010603781,0.0011608048,0.00010128857,0.8305157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91332906,0.0022595741,0.0014355578,0.010450328,0.00023126301,0.000040343697,0.0003208871,0.000046621946,0.07188631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98643076,0.001113328,0.0002341786,0.00086438446,0.007549941,0.0038074234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98117024,0.0033058436,0.0010871033,0.0012315271,0.00897037,0.004235032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054968493,0.00020860585,0.0003881429,0.0024698607,0.015152053,0.010274492,0.0018979423,0.0022136318,0.024535319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027924204,0.00025216342,0.0003783002,0.0023101454,0.008274254,0.0036227282,0.0041916417,0.00477573,0.0007356205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022641743,0.00003405859,0.008270348,0.00007682823,0.000016050839,0.00019855982,0.0071547898,0.0004186041,0.00030768156,0.8428507,0.077473156,0.063176624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002086945,0.0000515573,0.056081183,0.0003911013,0.000027611954,0.00017752807,0.008346522,0.0007054081,0.00034569085,0.08290416,0.8508198,0.00012860342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95353717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97987854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95353717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.064160064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13600509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46551603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1556722091","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226474.001.0001","title":"Interpreting Constitutions","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Originalism; Subject (documents); Field (mathematics); Political science; Politics; Epistemology; Sociology; Structuralism (philosophy of science); Law; Philosophy; Library science","score_opus":0.03299286928971369,"score_gpt":0.2610408205038639,"score_spread":0.22804795121415022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1556722091","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012132419,0.004247638,0.016224662,0.008221796,0.00073148415,0.00006033473,0.00018594049,0.00014919267,0.9580466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7371619,0.009421665,0.02199519,0.00298348,0.00082235754,0.00020517413,0.0007355175,0.00044681435,0.22622801],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99533564,0.0023088641,0.00025108166,0.00048070247,0.0011423517,0.00048131714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99741095,0.0017408569,0.00015576075,0.00029327444,0.00034279504,0.000056372788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004986287,0.00042215342,0.00042459997,0.0023349784,0.0067153513,0.00921889,0.00096648955,0.0017709488,0.008778092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009756237,0.00031033315,0.00036122397,0.0024025147,0.012782338,0.0054033473,0.0026839771,0.0032283496,0.0011798262],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014511486,0.0000018094695,0.00008600026,0.000017221326,0.000001055868,0.00003694771,0.0057984428,0.00009098167,0.00005098915,0.9838959,0.0043141595,0.0057051256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004324907,0.000007622468,0.000607122,0.00040000858,0.000007760593,0.00010237289,0.009898489,0.00030095264,0.00036897126,0.29397944,0.6943101,0.000012759595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008612266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012598888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00921889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006469283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047261366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04693812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1558787610","doi":"","title":"Constitutional remedies in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Canada Law Book","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.01511874661077318,"score_gpt":0.21306212178770484,"score_spread":0.19794337517693167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1558787610","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008335005,0.015260351,0.0015013864,0.045822453,0.0011544945,0.00011878586,0.0006575198,0.00010162464,0.9270484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37463456,0.01663491,0.002598477,0.024237547,0.0008828702,0.00023063699,0.0004192314,0.00019377845,0.58016795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893941,0.00089397805,0.00025103183,0.00076439633,0.0053984676,0.0032979813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946831,0.0013994761,0.00016243522,0.00032098318,0.002856101,0.00057787885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00404285,0.0007847583,0.0012508472,0.0043057986,0.028069,0.014686706,0.0038675223,0.008320479,0.01836129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01669389,0.0010319503,0.00081379956,0.0068621333,0.014568402,0.003011812,0.0029276977,0.01195374,0.0012806997],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006916859,0.000013295582,0.00018295879,0.000031623043,0.000008351732,0.000052415668,0.00078257214,0.00048697734,0.000034857374,0.9075604,0.08055889,0.010280798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036817175,0.000013464202,0.0025729986,0.0005012859,0.00006409765,0.000056565867,0.0021726629,0.0012041652,0.00021981238,0.2112522,0.78179747,0.00010854419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99293363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9959266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.168731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.168731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32945934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9641542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1559463507","doi":"","title":"Constitutionalism, Judicial Review, and Progressive Change","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Constitution; Political science; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Judicial review; Legislature; Judicial activism; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.03625011304463269,"score_gpt":0.31315411008103683,"score_spread":0.2769039970364041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1559463507","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041263923,0.053428236,0.025198037,0.19034098,0.0020926995,0.0001982563,0.00007749049,0.00010862742,0.6872917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94860137,0.010104276,0.0027542256,0.0155147435,0.0026081286,0.00011140815,0.000043239816,0.000035609846,0.020227091],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9682645,0.015073856,0.0009705872,0.0032942623,0.008551555,0.003845155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96793,0.022607815,0.0027339966,0.0020852871,0.0035960022,0.0010469714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025301436,0.0002915012,0.0005968545,0.0031848187,0.0067545194,0.009721858,0.001756886,0.0050500073,0.0043828296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04690791,0.00028555223,0.000633843,0.0023580738,0.035926778,0.0075472873,0.005540942,0.005736985,0.00042533444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030729796,0.000008859229,0.000105558756,0.000017805804,0.0000035855094,0.000026769349,0.00043972267,0.00013384546,0.000017338201,0.9931491,0.0018243066,0.0042700833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003898998,0.000025750043,0.000535741,0.00012058098,0.000009801814,0.00006317892,0.00052879896,0.00036973442,0.00014092855,0.9138201,0.084331185,0.000015252336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00950471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008905527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025301436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010713682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012461179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13380843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1560480705","doi":"","title":"Legal Outlier, Again? U.S. Felon Suffrage: Comparative and International Human Rights Perspectives","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Suffrage; Law; Human rights; Universal suffrage; Democracy; Jurisprudence; Politics","score_opus":0.01714614633648693,"score_gpt":0.32253337236704055,"score_spread":0.3053872260305536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1560480705","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02062963,0.08672488,0.0007883312,0.12818705,0.0010724115,0.000014888207,0.00008553318,0.000022155647,0.7624752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84879744,0.08752267,0.0011182834,0.03669171,0.0029728701,0.000090341506,0.00018098489,0.00007980575,0.022545861],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951402,0.002679874,0.000101908496,0.00047589274,0.0005286109,0.0010735035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99544096,0.0031483816,0.0003776183,0.00020990442,0.00044019806,0.00038294616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006085411,0.00067124143,0.0007289616,0.0068129115,0.010242355,0.017989228,0.0015278413,0.008268152,0.010700479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051181414,0.00023782431,0.0005494462,0.0073490576,0.02793701,0.013763723,0.0049287626,0.009002122,0.00068968214],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000099363515,0.000019597928,0.00034965418,0.00010167441,0.0000045176666,0.00013472176,0.011510201,0.000054526034,0.00004470537,0.97046834,0.0076686344,0.009633486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010665878,0.00008853711,0.004315384,0.0035016271,0.000038420658,0.00054088194,0.0881895,0.00023385558,0.0002962289,0.22919883,0.6735466,0.000039443792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024043553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03350355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024043553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014418564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005234698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.104614496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1561034820","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511493904","title":"European and US Constitutionalism","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Computer science; Library science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.025965273204075198,"score_gpt":0.2236831641834604,"score_spread":0.1977178909793852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1561034820","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0076721553,0.012390807,0.00081528776,0.006434795,0.00029980866,0.0000045494503,0.00003764359,0.000013272506,0.9723316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7303037,0.016816197,0.0017910997,0.009039581,0.00084924867,0.00008509053,0.00020499241,0.0000849428,0.24082507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976313,0.0010350721,0.00008356772,0.00031368618,0.00047556887,0.00046070642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989557,0.0005318678,0.00007518589,0.00016063689,0.00017374507,0.000102875376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022570493,0.00022251817,0.00023371584,0.0012088179,0.003145698,0.0059979553,0.0004418403,0.001541441,0.009248654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041430355,0.00009922423,0.00031948186,0.002565495,0.008457747,0.0037035174,0.002344816,0.002425761,0.000633464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021143992,0.0000029362805,0.000047475387,0.0000079642405,9.023682e-7,0.0000126513705,0.0007099037,0.000028022636,0.000015842832,0.99096996,0.0041356655,0.0040665963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061496808,0.0000113861915,0.0011575369,0.00023539328,0.0000066459793,0.00011222806,0.0017927589,0.0001403888,0.00011303279,0.28304955,0.7133692,0.000005691681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075948606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009850601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009248654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005502585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022319686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039924204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1561623001","doi":"","title":"Refining the Reasonable Apprehension of Bias Test: Providing Judges Better Tools for Addressing Judicial Disqualification","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Fredericton; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Apprehension; Test (biology); Jurisprudence; Impartiality; Empirical research; Jury; Computer science; Order (exchange); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Economics; Mathematics; Statistics; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.2246390831351174,"score_gpt":0.3520059039448535,"score_spread":0.12736682080973608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1561623001","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27105138,0.0013910241,0.54093474,0.06438344,0.0012468817,0.0020581477,0.000531257,0.0009134368,0.117489606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78958744,0.00025283595,0.20276879,0.0038424004,0.0002200203,0.00052467873,0.00011062556,0.00007438901,0.0026187967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.91864777,0.04187045,0.0063185794,0.0052629076,0.025019793,0.0028804739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7929347,0.14123131,0.0133772,0.018671907,0.030526524,0.0032582928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.069263525,0.00041259255,0.0011839917,0.004508641,0.0034316045,0.006987227,0.005153278,0.005079066,0.0044427174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2828052,0.0004644361,0.0012787837,0.002921549,0.017510377,0.010767646,0.006010198,0.0057036406,0.0006521962],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026899757,0.00024627394,0.02916547,0.00030918763,0.000057080568,0.00045932253,0.010701092,0.002405299,0.001947671,0.8008854,0.010792949,0.14276123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049091416,0.0010872198,0.046850007,0.00083200866,0.00031364948,0.001059086,0.010837721,0.057366364,0.013662684,0.7823685,0.08453698,0.0005948105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015445821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020646563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.069263525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054283487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015785828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36630493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1562336716","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781316018132.005","title":"The Constitutional Itch","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Computer science; Internet privacy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0593649523209513,"score_gpt":0.25007485063163265,"score_spread":0.19070989831068136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1562336716","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002023166,0.0019879742,0.004594627,0.026234236,0.001475294,0.000077634475,0.00038987806,0.00015255291,0.9630647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1946171,0.0022609432,0.004302571,0.032150928,0.0015999619,0.0005114722,0.00079329795,0.00038515017,0.76337856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929941,0.0016576895,0.00032705223,0.0019424604,0.0018897838,0.0011887352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99706095,0.00083427917,0.00011033804,0.00096451305,0.0007620821,0.00026778196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054584183,0.00062320236,0.00074069615,0.001641307,0.010888155,0.013850199,0.0020864129,0.007736402,0.055736803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012785619,0.00047196302,0.0006712302,0.0015725025,0.015570061,0.010079067,0.008017214,0.009867259,0.01196815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033832648,0.000004056001,0.000037299436,0.0000072559696,0.000001119325,0.000015778789,0.0003375421,0.000029084671,0.000027889533,0.9756665,0.020316316,0.003553707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071384347,0.0000095751375,0.00016511498,0.00010527997,0.000004803573,0.000042144147,0.0004884988,0.00011586309,0.000116285744,0.17726749,0.8216654,0.000012413964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022193981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021052033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055736803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010692522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012500502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18645823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1563553261","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511617393","title":"The Gender of Constitutional Jurisprudence","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Adjudication; Constitution; Political science; Law; Constitutional law; Democracy; State (computer science); Constitutional court; Politics","score_opus":0.03507566743936148,"score_gpt":0.2465178181390853,"score_spread":0.21144215069972383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1563553261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02267411,0.024290364,0.0069304686,0.044652663,0.0014223944,0.000025421594,0.0000412234,0.000042826694,0.8999204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89450383,0.00851607,0.002027961,0.009020711,0.001567933,0.00013094857,0.000035859928,0.000111168614,0.08408549],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.992965,0.0044377083,0.00012895587,0.0005195212,0.0011472139,0.0008016477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925597,0.0061517265,0.00027540117,0.00045055817,0.00032333168,0.0002392398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059588626,0.00031224883,0.000554324,0.0018392439,0.006573217,0.010259244,0.0010326073,0.0022012503,0.0052082143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010783213,0.0002982512,0.00031939903,0.0019188977,0.0606449,0.0065530213,0.0035895193,0.0048402688,0.00055737305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016977791,0.0000021757216,0.000051184004,0.00000841768,6.7377056e-7,0.000016630822,0.00357907,0.00001912568,0.000022275774,0.99330163,0.0013263207,0.001670931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014424058,0.000018497487,0.0005867069,0.00018097524,0.000004360678,0.0000944157,0.008673344,0.00011617162,0.0001346886,0.6240445,0.3661228,0.000009060342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003670264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039574723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010259244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066386284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037085211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04816687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1564250760","doi":"10.26522/ssj.v3i2.1017","title":"Justice as Told by Judges: The Case of Litigation over Local Anti-Immigrant Legislation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Social Justice","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Law; Political science; Enforcement; Economic Justice; Legislation; Context (archaeology); Politics; Rhetoric; Immigration law; Narrative; Immigration reform; Sociology","score_opus":0.05177758798735344,"score_gpt":0.38271059481678776,"score_spread":0.33093300682943433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1564250760","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3642339,0.007764946,0.0053955605,0.28325698,0.0025486192,0.00019095193,0.000092766146,0.000071246766,0.33644494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9477119,0.0012633747,0.0009918307,0.03381343,0.001004827,0.00012289871,0.000024757266,0.000036470978,0.0150305275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96036756,0.023874335,0.0010169095,0.0028278944,0.0044025597,0.007510864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9727611,0.021400772,0.0014479907,0.00072169636,0.0017740543,0.0018943901],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020191137,0.0007355778,0.0011874897,0.002049053,0.06966056,0.024849076,0.0037634629,0.033481784,0.0039119055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05910815,0.0011084889,0.0016096431,0.0020973606,0.03237254,0.010250614,0.010370765,0.026313256,0.00070387387],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000117040894,0.000101168036,0.0022224518,0.00013245609,0.00006389357,0.02027015,0.35178754,0.0005580352,0.0008526913,0.57491857,0.040407546,0.008568462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023412085,0.0002274497,0.002806127,0.000882739,0.00023335224,0.0049202773,0.43887138,0.0028528667,0.0021456648,0.1907223,0.35578436,0.00031938325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045068152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.076734535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06966056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014035688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011442936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1067822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1565054210","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1014","title":"Patterning Rights Constitutionalism: Thirty Years with the Charter","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Charter; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.01619015104397401,"score_gpt":0.24381005635812508,"score_spread":0.22761990531415108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1565054210","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07331628,0.06054076,0.00848223,0.38235846,0.0041210256,0.000102362064,0.000308797,0.00012260601,0.4706476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8853082,0.017389065,0.0030744246,0.028596872,0.0011586862,0.000064748405,0.00014134639,0.00020116886,0.06406536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904113,0.0033158027,0.00019727826,0.0007479713,0.0030677016,0.0022600114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887283,0.0055611213,0.0004091931,0.0009997482,0.002826373,0.0014752322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013678615,0.00029793146,0.00045550714,0.0015611211,0.019878808,0.01658788,0.001485527,0.002923668,0.0055791843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01951573,0.00033865304,0.00028957496,0.0031139452,0.04665778,0.011926243,0.0063262987,0.009119977,0.00036216568],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017649856,0.000013838083,0.00043755176,0.000038630507,0.0000049935775,0.00012568665,0.034862123,0.00017529474,0.00011736218,0.9139358,0.031203195,0.019067861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012505188,0.000015403812,0.0012863323,0.00022984305,0.0000059527943,0.000054818243,0.021263534,0.00014694054,0.00024531689,0.11198406,0.864715,0.000040239018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6752599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.798121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3247401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057980273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06911253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6533051},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1565387334","doi":"","title":"Canada: Protecting Rights in a ‘Worldwide Rights Culture’ - An Empirical Study of the Use of Foreign Precedents by the Supreme Court of Canada (1982–2010)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Charter; Political science; Jurisprudence; Fundamental rights; Judicial review; Human rights; International human rights law","score_opus":0.026225507154744962,"score_gpt":0.2685935236772126,"score_spread":0.24236801652246764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1565387334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7765038,0.0079018865,0.0005018012,0.024582312,0.00020409233,0.000119581026,0.001035278,0.000032683685,0.18911853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98408866,0.0024622786,0.00023507934,0.001863428,0.00002649247,0.000022566335,0.00026936256,0.000027601587,0.011004511],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98906285,0.0010931051,0.00021642273,0.0010097519,0.006198771,0.0024190617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9789044,0.006467818,0.0026173724,0.000682727,0.008005662,0.003321945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048664263,0.0003023775,0.0005937984,0.0043637203,0.030866994,0.0112481555,0.002203171,0.002450616,0.0070349844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0300145,0.00041788246,0.0003100132,0.015087025,0.014922679,0.004147169,0.003961305,0.004885855,0.00040261127],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011542157,0.00022002672,0.16475686,0.00036062585,0.000074644246,0.0022099926,0.49596968,0.0007470033,0.0006636819,0.18862623,0.066571966,0.079683825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019012461,0.00006068157,0.31601122,0.0008078879,0.000061060935,0.00043830826,0.38933814,0.0006366428,0.0004992941,0.0036781235,0.28826985,0.00017984233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99483716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99789774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1608709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1608709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18746677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97327083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1569720508","doi":"","title":"Morality Policies, Legal Mobilisation, and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: Does Policy Determine Politics and Patterns of Judicialisation?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Politics; Morality; Political science; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.008026571699745822,"score_gpt":0.2623856916461283,"score_spread":0.2543591199463825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1569720508","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45707023,0.002951441,0.0024614632,0.08375036,0.000117943295,0.00014051964,0.0005969258,0.00007133124,0.45283973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98430336,0.0005586613,0.0005713124,0.0012331336,0.00002819347,0.000024139796,0.00006521624,0.000025228564,0.013190816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98633194,0.001723192,0.00025871865,0.0010789911,0.0040061614,0.0066009792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9776242,0.006597672,0.0024679892,0.0010555611,0.0073712356,0.0048833378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010969945,0.00034832055,0.00073174457,0.0059146173,0.02870862,0.017052798,0.003295511,0.0037859397,0.015381575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037414506,0.0005286129,0.00045590088,0.008612246,0.029880201,0.00483579,0.0048181275,0.007804404,0.00050717563],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006656752,0.000053282,0.011592776,0.00006930209,0.000019738667,0.00006868427,0.02481903,0.000614302,0.00046390848,0.9319075,0.008319155,0.02200577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001523527,0.00007341779,0.3223027,0.0007546513,0.00010582935,0.0001008693,0.09547279,0.00286807,0.0013415613,0.23942053,0.3371187,0.00028856756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98466104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99299264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1748199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1748199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27912572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9570919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1569721685","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1167","title":"Interjurisdictional Immunity: The Pendulum Has Swung","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Supreme court; Federalism; Law; Political science; Legislation; CLARITY; Politics","score_opus":0.08908984185563963,"score_gpt":0.31969211829538574,"score_spread":0.23060227643974612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1569721685","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050125815,0.09233792,0.0049414616,0.4016939,0.0035185926,0.000044569217,0.0002064798,0.000068228524,0.447063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7782602,0.023840565,0.0014356123,0.15339921,0.0022766704,0.000040449286,0.00011965827,0.000047678815,0.040579982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98682433,0.0019121021,0.0003167525,0.0015332474,0.006019896,0.0033935222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883383,0.007065345,0.00040443407,0.00048719108,0.0028049566,0.0008997981],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009552323,0.00033903355,0.0007802604,0.0022045162,0.014906644,0.011550144,0.004190923,0.012346114,0.0042935987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017319301,0.0004101209,0.00056641933,0.0022681896,0.035617203,0.0067839343,0.0039252113,0.012995041,0.00046641126],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000899004,0.000009873712,0.0005001354,0.00006200201,0.000007472776,0.00007890918,0.0018029921,0.00008017514,0.000073011775,0.969386,0.016284443,0.01170608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006846326,0.00009680351,0.008752114,0.0012553586,0.00012152329,0.00030366558,0.0073011047,0.00047248433,0.00093711383,0.24605812,0.7344883,0.00014489442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7827783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8957981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21722168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037087355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0646681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43700182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1570396721","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjm022","title":"Courts and Federalism: Judicial Doctrine in the United States, Australia, and Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius-the Journal of Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Doctrine; Judicial review; Law; New Federalism; Politics","score_opus":0.045887533685036036,"score_gpt":0.28397397562514687,"score_spread":0.23808644194011083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1570396721","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53048104,0.031408668,0.0013918253,0.12872784,0.00040452788,0.00007430787,0.00045944122,0.000057934532,0.30699447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97329843,0.0037556088,0.0004822785,0.0038384825,0.00009923614,0.000016370612,0.000041061077,0.000016111431,0.01845249],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940718,0.0011979563,0.00015855553,0.0003280535,0.001962516,0.0022810993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884957,0.004892134,0.00079752185,0.00022711395,0.0037960887,0.001791313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047429437,0.00016703698,0.00055768096,0.002968443,0.015563282,0.013013679,0.0017603232,0.0044069155,0.0048824903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022064786,0.0004129518,0.00043842744,0.006539234,0.01432076,0.0030126383,0.0026574351,0.0064192857,0.00017457179],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004769722,0.000051213243,0.012071656,0.00007426327,0.000029955865,0.00023164741,0.019972121,0.0010479089,0.00017340425,0.9254404,0.020422142,0.02043767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001298528,0.000079172394,0.28712,0.0012393855,0.00021191734,0.0002394135,0.0625877,0.0070578037,0.0006617123,0.22512065,0.41526896,0.00028336534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98943007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99609584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88955367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11044632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19620536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80134785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1570976271","doi":"","title":"The Promise and Limits of Citizens' Assemblies: Deliberation, Institutions and the Law of Democracy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Political science; Referendum; Democracy; Supreme court; Legislature; Jurisprudence; Law; Election law; Deliberative democracy; Politics; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.024111578717143776,"score_gpt":0.29726070861731035,"score_spread":0.2731491299001666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1570976271","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33866385,0.0041713933,0.011838047,0.074176796,0.00011841613,0.000031843803,0.000059133097,0.000056822966,0.5708837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99249697,0.00026926884,0.00045832884,0.00050262356,0.0000139177755,0.000014861712,0.00000789502,0.000007679406,0.0062283846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888882,0.006947946,0.00018530762,0.00063071854,0.0013523331,0.0019954648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991113,0.006017891,0.0008643547,0.00069698127,0.00074766297,0.00056014623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008491668,0.00018879943,0.00036298487,0.0008776702,0.013020557,0.011323375,0.0012684284,0.002814265,0.0028789653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013178448,0.000314426,0.00020788865,0.0014128294,0.055165086,0.00512573,0.004317891,0.0027675524,0.00031902836],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001722747,0.000008227419,0.0011213185,0.000014866678,0.000002634026,0.000040655857,0.018018192,0.00045451077,0.000054520046,0.97293043,0.0009838362,0.0063535054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004354956,0.000039829432,0.008473611,0.00022172532,0.00002469196,0.000060140814,0.037189238,0.0019497559,0.00051523926,0.8144057,0.13703424,0.000042404437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33226988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3797606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33226988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025459008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017899364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6606717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1571018866","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2161768","title":"Thuyết cân đối trong vấn đề giải thích các quyền về hiến pháp: so sánh giữa Canada, Liên Hiệp các Vương Quốc Anh và Singapore và kinh nghiệm cho Vìệt Nam (Proportionality in Interpreting Constitutional Rights: A Comparison between Canada, the United Kingdom and Singapore and Its Implications for Vietnam)","year":2012,"lang":"vi","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Chemistry","score_opus":0.04096541350070895,"score_gpt":0.3192811625929438,"score_spread":0.2783157490922349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1571018866","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0925266,0.011377912,0.00088869256,0.021495683,0.001612707,0.000096741474,0.0011171652,0.00008674844,0.87079763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3874662,0.003855931,0.0008468979,0.0018940526,0.00007734632,0.00007046554,0.00027487724,0.00007747972,0.6054366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996891,0.00005511085,0.000009774857,0.00004831414,0.000078824916,0.00011898587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968266,0.000101099286,0.000025652676,0.000012894819,0.00009964386,0.000078080055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039687112,0.00027800712,0.00020796814,0.00040169005,0.005979389,0.0040120133,0.0003741197,0.0012173263,0.05684756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012466469,0.00027165713,0.0001463774,0.0010945873,0.0015628411,0.0015966926,0.0008009707,0.0019969663,0.0035824892],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018405571,0.000054691638,0.015084229,0.000447579,0.000029783716,0.0025466122,0.044667464,0.00038836565,0.0023276054,0.5699764,0.2905633,0.07372997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001364648,0.00002301949,0.012209789,0.0001586693,0.000012719761,0.00027389437,0.019375388,0.0002097257,0.0010245178,0.006244997,0.9604234,0.000030114294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.54466605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7798566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45533395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008048321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007629624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.916031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1571866199","doi":"","title":"Legal Positivism? What Are You Talking About? ('De Quel Positivisme Parlez-Vous?')","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Legal positivism; Typology; Ideology; Epistemology; Sociology; Order (exchange); Law; Legal realism; Philosophy; Political science; Legal research; Politics","score_opus":0.011995759599280323,"score_gpt":0.25988105344902124,"score_spread":0.24788529384974092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1571866199","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0057099196,0.08660002,0.035015903,0.6303713,0.009464486,0.000032221116,0.0002804776,0.00022928117,0.23229636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67252916,0.058491316,0.02297024,0.120158486,0.01293725,0.00023949353,0.0002930164,0.0005527166,0.11182838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99440986,0.0037971511,0.00012999128,0.0005110553,0.0008463686,0.00030549805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99507374,0.0033396923,0.00040021958,0.0003927544,0.00060936,0.00018416483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076246364,0.0005292741,0.0005599073,0.002031828,0.0044207806,0.008418218,0.0013270362,0.0041701416,0.00900297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009990123,0.00032291116,0.00046257157,0.002224628,0.0300468,0.014510438,0.0022560735,0.008917256,0.0024111012],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004474045,0.000004538944,0.00007519743,0.000040580326,0.0000025123052,0.000022701171,0.0045096693,0.000035834593,0.00004944051,0.9558573,0.033349793,0.006048002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007385038,0.000009488502,0.00038650332,0.00042827413,0.000004201047,0.00014392362,0.0051174304,0.00022725879,0.00020932876,0.5227329,0.47071183,0.000021439228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011129961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008100271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011129961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005923854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003416412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04298073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1574715162","doi":"","title":"The Supreme Court's Understanding of the Democratic Self-Government, Advancement of Truth and Knowledge and Individual Self-Realization Rationales for Protecting Freedom of Expression: Part I - Taking Stock","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fondation pour la recherche juridique","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Jurisprudence; Law; Democracy; Political science; Government (linguistics); Expression (computer science); Freedom of thought; Law and economics; Sociology; Human rights; Politics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.05728068230840502,"score_gpt":0.29420965297263313,"score_spread":0.2369289706642281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1574715162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041561622,0.008213406,0.017729161,0.27668732,0.0006852059,0.000088315996,0.00028793284,0.00007156066,0.6546754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9138382,0.0020046541,0.004452865,0.035483513,0.0003056367,0.000084256186,0.00007792029,0.000027193806,0.043725733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98957074,0.0023206237,0.00027067043,0.000865224,0.0043352228,0.0026375628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960943,0.0017749162,0.0002561505,0.0002336148,0.0012207456,0.00042020838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056801005,0.00032394877,0.0005052412,0.0016908515,0.016940964,0.015848864,0.0026531592,0.010361798,0.0024133492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007500834,0.00040093294,0.0006205338,0.0016116381,0.046399698,0.0042849313,0.0030564577,0.010645176,0.00028625032],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012546861,0.0000016208254,0.00006232312,0.000005026974,0.0000012317943,0.00001766765,0.001029274,0.00007231643,0.00002466633,0.9955903,0.0026884077,0.0005058199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021413536,0.0000115309,0.0013088977,0.00024354561,0.000019082372,0.000069333815,0.0038498172,0.0011917121,0.00059561717,0.80452436,0.18811616,0.000048523158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.77364457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81786114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77364457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05274796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08324153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45537692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1577710887","doi":"","title":"Representing People and Not Interests: A Rawlsian Conceptualization of the Right to Vote","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Conceptualization; Democracy; Law and economics; Political science; Politics; Law; Economic Justice; Reinterpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Original position; Constitutional law; Veil of ignorance; Political philosophy; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011237846854839332,"score_gpt":0.28432381848832733,"score_spread":0.273085971633488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1577710887","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012804913,0.0056304852,0.043966725,0.06387145,0.000678269,0.00006738486,0.0001160703,0.00004242698,0.8728222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89615005,0.002844031,0.01048537,0.009860014,0.00055778533,0.00020993681,0.000105473904,0.00009766265,0.079689726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935935,0.003039407,0.00014141013,0.00063095626,0.001565808,0.0010288169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977962,0.0012289151,0.00015924948,0.0002318419,0.00038898407,0.00019483354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005766036,0.0005460695,0.0005381654,0.0024021843,0.007390599,0.009727429,0.0026627977,0.0041402527,0.0050204233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005251667,0.00032617385,0.0006676134,0.0022695204,0.045532573,0.009282113,0.004032671,0.005512956,0.0008071193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.2339277e-7,9.3697025e-7,0.00001420138,0.0000019721317,2.7239497e-7,0.000004351463,0.00082694046,0.000024297562,0.0000038937133,0.99828774,0.00044275954,0.00039202702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005758377,0.0000054288594,0.00015079525,0.0000498236,0.0000033657736,0.000026806294,0.0012781172,0.00020897549,0.000046044242,0.91571504,0.082502455,0.0000072857224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05974518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06331089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05974518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016881706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010745138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.122485936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1577809066","doi":"","title":"Doucet-Boudreau, Dialogue and Judicial Activism: Tempest in a Teapot?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Jurisdiction; Political science; Tempest; Judicial review; Government (linguistics); Judicial activism; Separation of powers; Constitution; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012400464073289787,"score_gpt":0.27760833242022226,"score_spread":0.2652078683469325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1577809066","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021318398,0.04918451,0.002638409,0.6371256,0.0023402667,0.00003455195,0.00007313644,0.00004414999,0.28724098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7709878,0.011227025,0.0011647157,0.16597377,0.0029957553,0.00014668035,0.00003986126,0.00007849571,0.047385905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98995095,0.004521478,0.00016158228,0.0011713537,0.0013348879,0.002859682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992732,0.0049366984,0.0003919284,0.00036816124,0.00077283767,0.0007983883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077183982,0.00062030525,0.00070869277,0.0013494426,0.033944473,0.027469978,0.0034093587,0.030191652,0.0051917047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013073406,0.000468596,0.0006059804,0.0014907058,0.06230267,0.019014068,0.0065470915,0.021374278,0.000793922],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014494901,0.0000115939065,0.00021324998,0.000026566293,0.000003184371,0.00018224206,0.015886154,0.000025813082,0.000052270818,0.9425607,0.03782285,0.0032009562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007130175,0.000021656979,0.0015082099,0.000576146,0.00001662019,0.0003008037,0.052755278,0.00029256908,0.00032131872,0.50812656,0.43594497,0.00006455937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13633768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23190026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8636623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017856112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017067533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27108824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1578089255","doi":"10.7202/040265ar","title":"Judicial Power and the Charter: Canada and the Paradox of Liberal Constitutionalism de Christopher Manfredi, Toronto, Oxford University Press, 2 édition, 2001, XVII, 276 p.","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Politique et Sociétés","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Charter; Political science; Power (physics); Law; Humanities; Philosophy; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.024208070188132227,"score_gpt":0.3051134867957632,"score_spread":0.280905416607631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1578089255","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028568956,0.7440242,0.0010002581,0.18217222,0.0024361236,0.000023303188,0.00027787357,0.000037744157,0.06717133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20356156,0.65454006,0.002479123,0.029790856,0.006011193,0.000088163266,0.0004349384,0.00019626004,0.10289787],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787486,0.0005026108,0.0000615708,0.00021197234,0.0009914101,0.00035753552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99781644,0.001129112,0.0002341071,0.00010494028,0.00052336004,0.00019207622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020317875,0.0008737452,0.00071418186,0.0029820958,0.0061646346,0.009039366,0.0020873724,0.0037791673,0.006947946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052984757,0.00063211913,0.00027829246,0.01032161,0.01700041,0.008162801,0.0018169327,0.004652919,0.00088359584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025453048,0.000011741774,0.00036351604,0.00022488074,0.00000860886,0.0001178379,0.007023366,0.00028990762,0.000100354926,0.45705518,0.51235765,0.02242143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015716423,0.0000051187953,0.002321065,0.0005932951,0.0000068478435,0.000095817515,0.0036817335,0.00015712684,0.000115435985,0.11891244,0.8740558,0.00003961488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67039245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83129346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32960755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039142706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034115717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6630973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579027523","doi":"","title":"Classical Liberalism Meets the New Constitutional Order: A Comment on Mark Tushnet","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitution; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Political science; Judicial review; Sociology","score_opus":0.032503338675555944,"score_gpt":0.28933969375296953,"score_spread":0.2568363550774136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579027523","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013734923,0.006474586,0.00031815597,0.97205216,0.002263908,0.0000073803863,0.000045084536,0.0000145986105,0.017450636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07569375,0.0058202106,0.00066076877,0.87683576,0.01252978,0.00008664994,0.000042679792,0.000062870415,0.028267646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953816,0.0016506034,0.00014309153,0.0009266391,0.0011999396,0.0006981021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991372,0.00710991,0.0002627835,0.0002657457,0.0006579327,0.0003316257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008517289,0.00057987444,0.0011614597,0.0012821131,0.010985089,0.009263937,0.005327501,0.036819723,0.0062225778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013702747,0.00060067174,0.00089134794,0.0022164236,0.032440446,0.014786138,0.0031484293,0.033046484,0.0013996742],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002146832,0.000013196087,0.00010907879,0.000045690755,0.000004625931,0.00017138259,0.0021817652,0.00014870735,0.00004364343,0.7080235,0.285655,0.0035819816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004691551,0.000021378386,0.0006778007,0.00043392833,0.000011961486,0.00013277364,0.002793652,0.000668802,0.0001924699,0.4197858,0.57516694,0.000067646455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10321913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12978633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10321913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015959354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009318346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20523661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579039961","doi":"","title":"Unconscious Parallelism: Constitutional Law in Canada and the United States","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscious mind; Parallelism (grammar); Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Computer science; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Parallel computing","score_opus":0.02160463035647291,"score_gpt":0.25290760488581365,"score_spread":0.23130297452934073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579039961","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2237254,0.005293043,0.0069998153,0.07537497,0.00035651439,0.000063083615,0.00019494061,0.000081594786,0.68791074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825782,0.0005852363,0.00067020505,0.0022746436,0.00003101748,0.000012272747,0.000030071544,0.00001904876,0.013799312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994224,0.0013956667,0.000115741976,0.00063888927,0.0020683357,0.0015573753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99681586,0.0011636936,0.00019519085,0.0002099125,0.0011204417,0.00049491366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039540045,0.00024060295,0.0003774306,0.0022198777,0.023837226,0.0152892945,0.0015574908,0.0036039695,0.0041840156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009925176,0.00030067624,0.0003231381,0.0034699915,0.051442694,0.004934526,0.0042419233,0.0060484135,0.00021716973],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006699302,0.000006838846,0.0005798474,0.0000075277826,0.0000035661117,0.0000833277,0.020153599,0.00018780892,0.00009117704,0.9728062,0.0021284553,0.003944972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006361611,0.000022782511,0.010876048,0.00025421267,0.000047896705,0.00014524165,0.069365464,0.0022719214,0.00061441754,0.6313762,0.28481513,0.0001469764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97614175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.985672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11324718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11324718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12238514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82166964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579513605","doi":"10.21991/c9sx0d","title":"The Politics of Hate Speech: A Case Comment on Warman v Lemire","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Law; Supreme court; Human rights; Statute; Charter; Political science; Politics; Constitutional right; Legitimacy; Sociology","score_opus":0.040232405356439634,"score_gpt":0.3080979706965263,"score_spread":0.26786556534008665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579513605","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05915181,0.008999671,0.0011046046,0.73209774,0.0027013768,0.00014606117,0.00011390887,0.000059586466,0.1956252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27703613,0.002733484,0.0005836475,0.6447231,0.001679775,0.00013220836,0.000050746487,0.00007454941,0.07298632],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870157,0.004130412,0.00027156793,0.0014865497,0.0031353293,0.0039604595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99094594,0.00680303,0.0003114893,0.00023166428,0.00088824454,0.0008196013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0105346665,0.00066394056,0.0007400823,0.0012822963,0.056115877,0.008325525,0.0052027423,0.038761497,0.006362145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018379442,0.00095896714,0.0011371386,0.0014016825,0.019111218,0.005897909,0.006711628,0.045191,0.0010106618],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087496606,0.00010986326,0.002214513,0.0001587773,0.00003592056,0.010960464,0.09221812,0.00030676188,0.0016855098,0.51041687,0.36903965,0.012766089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045407192,0.000078177334,0.0058495835,0.00092666975,0.0000641268,0.002503258,0.08038112,0.0006171942,0.0017418321,0.032219585,0.8752417,0.00033144205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6051548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7543746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3948452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033927597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036026187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.794341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1580333504","doi":"10.3138/jcs.44.2.122","title":"Aboriginal Self-Government through Constitutional Design: A Survey of Fourteen Aboriginal Constitutions in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Politics; Context (archaeology); Law; Government (linguistics); Constitutional law; Sociology; Political science; History","score_opus":0.05309572315644309,"score_gpt":0.33433555027358064,"score_spread":0.2812398271171376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1580333504","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.990266,0.00089101365,0.00007186606,0.0010128245,0.0000069981593,0.000049034294,0.00023413418,0.000004589002,0.0074635716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99448603,0.0016215217,0.00020192312,0.00021867371,0.0000043303344,0.00002875373,0.00021116041,0.000010367831,0.0032172475],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955505,0.00059150666,0.00020859443,0.00027181048,0.0021893305,0.0011881379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851423,0.004075965,0.0023214226,0.0004724569,0.0059238863,0.00206395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038876904,0.0001929098,0.00042221576,0.004328509,0.01578177,0.0038732875,0.0012538902,0.00070684095,0.0023806999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013911017,0.00033976193,0.00017645198,0.009554836,0.0059978194,0.0009938674,0.0024242995,0.0014292874,0.00016132246],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044854227,0.00005883244,0.24316888,0.00018976064,0.000018981322,0.0007693446,0.7180885,0.00009804991,0.00096689776,0.006769052,0.0030437661,0.026783036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051600773,0.000027816588,0.46744812,0.00016161369,0.000018351746,0.00023076008,0.47929657,0.00019863652,0.00028284494,0.00035502392,0.05193317,0.00004191996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9862897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99511445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07088806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07088806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09942111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5143312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1580510701","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199269808.001.0001","title":"The Ultimate Rule of Law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":249,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Impartiality; Supreme court; Politics; Jurisprudence; Human rights; Rule of law; Judicial restraint; Sovereignty; Objectivity (philosophy); Democracy; Judicial activism","score_opus":0.026927895775433475,"score_gpt":0.24061808799266846,"score_spread":0.21369019221723498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1580510701","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016065992,0.012074254,0.010455144,0.0155966915,0.0011206974,0.000044216104,0.00005121069,0.00005024385,0.9590009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44374704,0.023897499,0.016751042,0.024633124,0.0052313344,0.0005598357,0.00018742349,0.00023249521,0.48476022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929594,0.00254793,0.0002559619,0.0009470357,0.0027592,0.0005306077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970994,0.0017009987,0.00015188845,0.0004652186,0.00047596305,0.00010657234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048010373,0.00041385292,0.00053398794,0.0009738712,0.004285731,0.009238593,0.0011581883,0.003169799,0.0056281006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008279628,0.0003150507,0.00034838435,0.00071449426,0.028986385,0.0066480557,0.0026412697,0.0060979207,0.0025901378],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.5586763e-7,0.0000017277019,0.000011708709,0.000008909411,6.6731997e-7,0.0000060458487,0.00035893015,0.000025748564,0.000017059563,0.99298227,0.0044681295,0.0021179637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004378611,0.000008620644,0.00006602435,0.00011815233,0.0000023256468,0.000035015477,0.00034286678,0.00010209925,0.00008269369,0.65545183,0.343782,0.000004068393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040911827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003538599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009238593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042404593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059760516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030766785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1581033623","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781107565272","title":"Proportionality and the Rule of Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":101,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Human rights; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Appeal; Doctrine; Politics; Treaty; Constitutional law; Rule of law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02485090460507253,"score_gpt":0.23055432318057043,"score_spread":0.2057034185754979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1581033623","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0045587798,0.019138483,0.023174776,0.019783702,0.0012326261,0.0000605756,0.00007389313,0.00007539431,0.93190175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6590285,0.018828044,0.022243714,0.013659539,0.004813138,0.0005551176,0.00015531977,0.00024382574,0.28047282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939767,0.002180108,0.00026229487,0.000978209,0.0020533307,0.00054932554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952827,0.0031149052,0.00023167774,0.000573703,0.00065571605,0.00014122565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006084678,0.0005295363,0.0006032055,0.001501133,0.0044854432,0.0098168645,0.0014386284,0.0033814732,0.0054859202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012021846,0.00038643347,0.0006663409,0.0014589875,0.033754528,0.009559552,0.00278168,0.006838533,0.0016338549],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.0902473e-7,0.0000014851546,0.000009056107,0.0000053554027,6.652761e-7,0.0000045960164,0.00012575599,0.000044179968,0.000008251886,0.9973132,0.0012819285,0.0012049163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003868822,0.0000028850977,0.000031740754,0.000027594526,0.0000016004509,0.000012436511,0.000052752464,0.00012819111,0.000024568113,0.9603207,0.039391015,0.0000026356997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005661693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025994563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0098168645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057378146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00603263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041630924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1581729011","doi":"","title":"Une source paradoxale du droit constitutionnel canadien : les ententes intergouvernementales","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.010334740701726191,"score_gpt":0.19913831495344483,"score_spread":0.18880357425171865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1581729011","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08661004,0.0055280114,0.057781044,0.07155965,0.0013146629,0.00006411189,0.0013993933,0.0005961487,0.77514696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9168501,0.002351443,0.0061262394,0.0025092885,0.0007180708,0.000073766285,0.0005103997,0.0008638184,0.06999687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994632,0.002001861,0.00023500458,0.00093680684,0.001790712,0.00040357612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97952193,0.013453123,0.0007670188,0.003077884,0.0028610812,0.00031899117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055572568,0.00065192865,0.0013025829,0.006366746,0.007590678,0.015120179,0.0016116803,0.005384619,0.027837956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03307166,0.0007074316,0.00089871953,0.0071192877,0.013830721,0.020060303,0.0058409134,0.008057745,0.002457017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017151162,0.0000049355413,0.000104522944,0.00002184848,0.000005151113,0.00011886536,0.0021391523,0.00006679236,0.000052973133,0.99257326,0.0027459047,0.0021492948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046588775,0.0000060858006,0.0005041425,0.00013622944,0.000028116205,0.0003800074,0.0037058007,0.001004895,0.0005476101,0.90762323,0.085987344,0.000029965588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027744403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014503887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9914426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0085573755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040550157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09312725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1582100464","doi":"","title":"Jurisprudence and (Its) History","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Meaning (existential); Duty; Subject (documents); Legal history; Law; Legal realism; Philosophy of law; Epistemology; Discipline; Subject matter; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Legal profession; Comparative law; Computer science","score_opus":0.09844479449475196,"score_gpt":0.3144304861538041,"score_spread":0.21598569165905213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1582100464","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003882537,0.43948996,0.004295785,0.09009092,0.0034065333,0.000022577262,0.000071663875,0.000033722506,0.4587062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.568256,0.26600257,0.0031042502,0.029031426,0.012851731,0.00015750255,0.00016012146,0.0001165843,0.12031972],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99277836,0.0038596934,0.00029326393,0.00085560145,0.0016905782,0.0005224137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995559,0.0026463212,0.00031887545,0.0004760188,0.00072616665,0.00027352644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00512466,0.0003526337,0.00064183224,0.0031497977,0.0042965105,0.010083568,0.0012692072,0.0027354313,0.004498371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007922062,0.00036070505,0.00033874233,0.0030615896,0.02835995,0.005573061,0.0026066678,0.005132657,0.0009828209],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015218006,0.000002962125,0.00007183611,0.000040337352,0.000003018509,0.000020271815,0.0004446857,0.00006732283,0.0000126639725,0.9868439,0.007068437,0.005423147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004000926,0.000008137197,0.0004734918,0.00039349913,0.0000038295907,0.000054739787,0.0006037699,0.00007916559,0.000022844742,0.42596468,0.5723856,0.0000061371315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013523572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009474036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013523572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011148843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00817375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080890894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1582500210","doi":"10.71781/2076","title":"La liberté d'expression et l'administration de la justice : le choc de deux paradigmes","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.009074216274922383,"score_gpt":0.22195923516022423,"score_spread":0.21288501888530184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1582500210","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019537237,0.014073955,0.05273204,0.11878558,0.0012062455,0.00010247777,0.000067536814,0.000095260344,0.79339963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84985185,0.008224016,0.013797173,0.014390131,0.0013339955,0.00062966027,0.00007133716,0.00019993118,0.11150197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98037684,0.011674175,0.000520798,0.0017936295,0.0036613236,0.0019732711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916161,0.0045379945,0.00094471563,0.0012483835,0.0009203054,0.0007325638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013729873,0.0008370505,0.0009029464,0.0031134554,0.012973256,0.025713958,0.0023604566,0.007773828,0.008677052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009053442,0.00051334203,0.0009952883,0.0024828068,0.0906726,0.019211244,0.014733818,0.012501544,0.0015327265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033744423,0.0000044412545,0.000033696557,0.000012813625,8.1125137e-7,0.000009187629,0.004325703,0.000018610372,0.000016308084,0.9937994,0.0005124925,0.0012632553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024198647,0.000035470624,0.00032417628,0.0003655497,0.000009060173,0.00012172561,0.014238257,0.00028990963,0.00024264798,0.7609845,0.22333698,0.000027558712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0092568025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008733095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025713958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01696179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015486728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12306696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1582644885","doi":"","title":"Charters and constitution-making: Comparing the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the European Charter of Fundamental Rights","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitution; Fundamental rights; Political science; Law; Ex post facto law; International human rights law; Human rights; Law and economics; Right to property; Sociology","score_opus":0.04301559450175222,"score_gpt":0.2996867057343621,"score_spread":0.2566711112326099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1582644885","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14147863,0.009274777,0.0039119576,0.06658685,0.0007585361,0.00011750167,0.0015726588,0.000064630825,0.7762345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96979964,0.0035524487,0.0016856053,0.0028155444,0.00014800881,0.00004055244,0.0005495095,0.000062697174,0.021346113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98867255,0.001946349,0.00020597095,0.0007078372,0.005034253,0.0034329756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799912,0.008050692,0.001828431,0.0009169061,0.008005376,0.001207435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008168188,0.0004886283,0.0009534795,0.0053353678,0.013059399,0.015196655,0.0024619107,0.003086191,0.0120144235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051773544,0.00031910653,0.00068576675,0.014303289,0.01864544,0.0064008334,0.0026884573,0.005324571,0.0003262385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006219238,0.000022063849,0.003141145,0.00004709132,0.000021018444,0.00003768161,0.0029126978,0.000973635,0.000038566115,0.970394,0.012599936,0.00974994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022806713,0.000072026145,0.15250248,0.00077900855,0.00032790433,0.000094126604,0.031243632,0.0061647375,0.0006755498,0.45250568,0.3550549,0.00035190306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9878056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9928965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10984258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10984258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16921464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79696745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583214668","doi":"","title":"Where Did (Section) I Come from? The Debates Over the Limitations Clause at the Special Joint Committee of the Senate and the House of Commons on the Constitution, 1980-81","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Law; Constitution; Sketch; Legislative history; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Rhetorical question; House of Commons; Original intent; Constitutional interpretation; Constitutional law; Philosophy; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.018424312984282643,"score_gpt":0.23922177764897398,"score_spread":0.22079746466469133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1583214668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016925188,0.013152221,0.005338846,0.2891321,0.003857089,0.00011232918,0.00042431496,0.00005955781,0.67099845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5614606,0.01006042,0.0038957645,0.11463342,0.002421227,0.0002813725,0.00036315992,0.00029897806,0.30658507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99095446,0.0019160958,0.00025869143,0.0011200598,0.003294806,0.0024559123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99536234,0.0021581862,0.0003411338,0.0002543293,0.0014438517,0.0004402336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011873507,0.0004811998,0.0005430464,0.0018474313,0.020374464,0.016653495,0.0025652228,0.006620048,0.005741042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018129384,0.00071351277,0.0004575431,0.0034361638,0.038979087,0.010110196,0.003623398,0.015404231,0.000807895],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005965387,0.0000037955024,0.0002607519,0.000026582898,0.0000015933075,0.00003531455,0.007216278,0.000036224938,0.00004112962,0.96358514,0.02510273,0.003684519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013069588,0.000018575542,0.0032391024,0.00060065265,0.000014611972,0.00006117096,0.015970957,0.00010802637,0.00066192413,0.15252407,0.8267226,0.00006529723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7333437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7620087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.933892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06610801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06942142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5364533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1585474295","doi":"10.9732/46","title":"Judicial Systems in the World – Judicial Portraits: A study through time and space","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Americanae (AECID Library)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Common law; Jurisprudence; Public law; Private law; Principle of legality; Procedural law; Sharia; Comparative law; Islam; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016595349838503484,"score_gpt":0.27952119981972173,"score_spread":0.26292584998121826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1585474295","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06670145,0.042173725,0.00971659,0.01967532,0.00076111435,0.000028194836,0.00016516657,0.000076572906,0.86070186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96132684,0.010596253,0.002171458,0.0008562158,0.0006928209,0.000041746796,0.00010570882,0.00010378175,0.024105128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966491,0.0023018525,0.00008940312,0.00025822697,0.00048585457,0.00021562236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99507856,0.0033006095,0.00061056274,0.0003199117,0.00046728874,0.00022313635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026040832,0.00029230217,0.0002092856,0.0029146923,0.0051750783,0.01112538,0.00092354923,0.0014319284,0.008486033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007865648,0.0002508881,0.00023201933,0.0046504927,0.017428614,0.010685024,0.0019478888,0.0022335101,0.0008174197],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005098419,0.000005444387,0.0005496835,0.00003358676,0.0000025532959,0.000089617315,0.092422284,0.000105384446,0.000061544284,0.8903185,0.0073748073,0.009031572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044075005,0.0000145781305,0.0027594448,0.00034887093,0.0000053648923,0.0003563667,0.07401992,0.00030947715,0.000106419,0.16999488,0.75206476,0.000015541993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004106369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049367743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01112538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041447436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001317806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030072331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1585984566","doi":"","title":"Extending Charter Benefits to Canada’s Poor","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Politics; Realm; Supreme court; State (computer science); Constitution; Legislature; Law; Social rights; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.012296813617492497,"score_gpt":0.2619481549154188,"score_spread":0.2496513412979263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1585984566","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09354944,0.0035095997,0.0022504374,0.19671814,0.0008224424,0.00012220308,0.00073725794,0.00014473165,0.7021457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8840526,0.0026284605,0.002109479,0.036088932,0.0003134758,0.0000626225,0.00014922561,0.00005379525,0.07454135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949439,0.00054844475,0.000061078696,0.00022592838,0.001471591,0.0027491262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934534,0.0015501899,0.0002450582,0.00043025552,0.0024433914,0.001877697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045883767,0.00022081996,0.00028702698,0.0017290793,0.021407127,0.0070658424,0.0012340489,0.003269652,0.0084336875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011665754,0.00025345368,0.00030210867,0.0019113307,0.0067029395,0.0019667512,0.0046264604,0.003958918,0.00035766113],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054536184,0.000037552047,0.0061745755,0.00006993788,0.000011861403,0.0004876251,0.009722455,0.0011626006,0.0003550787,0.76074576,0.18293852,0.038239527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003869488,0.000037041376,0.016164823,0.00025806687,0.00002804001,0.0001395008,0.0068193134,0.00086828164,0.0003130138,0.043741748,0.93151975,0.00007176593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9647677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98876697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061409295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061409295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17019081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4455577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1586149894","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1063","title":"The Quasi-Revival of the Canadian Bill of Rights and Its Implications for Administrative Law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bill of rights; Jurisprudence; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Scope (computer science); Administrative law; Substantive rights; Fundamental rights; Substantive due process; Constitutional law; Constitutional right; Law and economics; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.08185562116440448,"score_gpt":0.36085192581595815,"score_spread":0.2789963046515537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1586149894","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06881001,0.017035546,0.0086933235,0.2290847,0.00095345895,0.000107462045,0.00038329695,0.00007664118,0.67485565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88803965,0.0056839893,0.004429459,0.03203734,0.00040315223,0.00006528987,0.000111137975,0.0000594306,0.0691706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98391217,0.001955557,0.00028245564,0.0013211812,0.009032295,0.0034963791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913652,0.0032594933,0.000523779,0.00053823175,0.003562538,0.000750733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008141214,0.0002534092,0.00045125364,0.0026653758,0.01869215,0.011769171,0.0026444031,0.0049080784,0.0035400318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019274598,0.0004601245,0.0005777365,0.0032210862,0.031147601,0.0044779396,0.0031865824,0.0077380603,0.00029421173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004676715,0.0000033811375,0.00031471188,0.000016178185,0.0000023282382,0.000049767066,0.0023369275,0.00009080053,0.000105261075,0.9873052,0.004956338,0.004814332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030675215,0.000039134124,0.02106886,0.0003436326,0.00003433817,0.0001752278,0.008088644,0.00082148734,0.0007198344,0.30445087,0.66409355,0.0001337321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9727233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9819369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89594895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10405103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12187801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7549466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1588999869","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1274","title":"The Arbitrariness in “Arbitrariness” (And Overbreadth and Gross Disproportionality): Principle and Democracy in Section 7 of the Charter","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Proportionality (law); Charter; Law; Democracy; Supreme court; Normative; Political science; Politics; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01966685127228478,"score_gpt":0.2924388884956059,"score_spread":0.2727720372233211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1588999869","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060653247,0.0031184424,0.12172369,0.039934713,0.0010588365,0.00020495828,0.00015315061,0.00021053712,0.7729424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93516064,0.0008091847,0.019925809,0.009086094,0.000527669,0.00026640802,0.000060813523,0.00011455171,0.03404884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97201186,0.010179613,0.0009402189,0.0041270643,0.0085855555,0.004155651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98960274,0.005551739,0.0008344427,0.0016213508,0.0018745583,0.000515217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021716192,0.00053429627,0.0008029427,0.0016118615,0.011564792,0.014416537,0.002465995,0.0055346447,0.002701062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021457082,0.0006083812,0.0012497517,0.0012097608,0.07794873,0.0073284134,0.006190698,0.012175513,0.00048978033],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027707622,0.0000018352081,0.000075046206,0.000004125196,0.0000012635016,0.000013221668,0.00089904637,0.000074979034,0.000038081907,0.9971474,0.00055065594,0.0011917144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011457643,0.000021235144,0.00066492613,0.00010164515,0.0000130897315,0.000046808673,0.0007929699,0.00053752057,0.00046890887,0.93195003,0.06534964,0.000041898642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15534472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15093088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8446553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017992074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03845471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30888104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1589149794","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2327537","title":"The Cross-Fertilization of Jurisprudence and the Principle of Proportionality: Process and Result from a Canadian Perspective","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Jurisprudence; Perspective (graphical); Law; Human fertilization; Political science; Law and economics; Mathematics; Sociology; Biology; Genetics","score_opus":0.007505088899732416,"score_gpt":0.3182876541956862,"score_spread":0.3107825652959538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1589149794","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03482216,0.0044850768,0.05239662,0.038825564,0.00030330694,0.00018877944,0.00017403688,0.0001226763,0.86868167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9170017,0.002562661,0.02600236,0.0035753893,0.00018724643,0.00013618609,0.000066509805,0.00015491123,0.050312996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9819151,0.005479678,0.0004854112,0.0022557902,0.0067687547,0.0030952506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9690263,0.018414415,0.0007956762,0.0021140978,0.008525231,0.0011241667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018718785,0.00089665945,0.001635251,0.005440333,0.022775384,0.016699996,0.0041474705,0.0068210727,0.011912182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051204156,0.0010844257,0.0017130018,0.0077934265,0.04186768,0.011012906,0.0061619915,0.009047886,0.00063231855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042080082,0.0000037216307,0.000054422475,0.0000076063598,0.0000021714727,0.000011860865,0.0006569062,0.00014269688,0.000015243964,0.9973447,0.00050567574,0.0012508756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003902881,0.000014470217,0.0011494185,0.00011208072,0.000046998284,0.000042345942,0.001466181,0.002940671,0.00034079573,0.94959635,0.044182,0.00006961361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9381112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9096393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12929775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12929775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15324494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9381252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1589651901","doi":"","title":"Constituting the Rule of Law: Fundamental Values in Administrative Law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Constitutionalism; Rule of law; Judicial review; Administrative law; Separation of powers; Constitutional law; Democracy; Precedent; Constitution; Politics","score_opus":0.1168773350146406,"score_gpt":0.3941967718101504,"score_spread":0.2773194367955098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1589651901","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025892654,0.011893674,0.03716501,0.096311666,0.0006496912,0.000074706855,0.00011064592,0.00009380998,0.82780796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9582151,0.0035154005,0.0094115045,0.005414989,0.00061663345,0.00011278004,0.00006684202,0.000056392684,0.022590471],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98480797,0.004861813,0.00048780144,0.0014372376,0.005219716,0.0031853912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890814,0.0054648984,0.0006628719,0.0013021937,0.0023843949,0.0011041482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012781051,0.0005668184,0.0007684701,0.0022446634,0.016904568,0.032630675,0.002833734,0.008179074,0.0020378209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01262458,0.0006606146,0.00058797013,0.0028096975,0.12744454,0.011638363,0.0050184135,0.010379357,0.00056045374],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.406848e-7,0.0000022126899,0.00003096094,0.000003095289,5.4168834e-7,0.000006496229,0.00068457844,0.00005505269,0.000008243837,0.99786574,0.0004397841,0.00090254715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050526687,0.000003562898,0.00015275567,0.00003838968,0.0000021420028,0.000011589833,0.0005963552,0.00021480561,0.000036272864,0.9772329,0.021698184,0.000007930118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28947866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23927286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28947866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046879247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052785236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5755874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590026019","doi":"","title":"The Case for the Legislative Override","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Legislation; Politics; Political science; Sovereignty; Democracy; Opposition (politics); Parliamentary sovereignty; Law; Law and economics; Judicial review; Sociology","score_opus":0.047892946942780144,"score_gpt":0.3418737048328157,"score_spread":0.2939807578900356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1590026019","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23776545,0.0037353986,0.030879736,0.26700932,0.0006795456,0.00008916717,0.000058996695,0.0000715229,0.45971093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9755374,0.0003366568,0.0029995637,0.014161304,0.000226571,0.0000577623,0.000016040562,0.000039741797,0.006625036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9592726,0.02668061,0.00077516516,0.002378807,0.005385641,0.005507131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9703912,0.016319942,0.0029867569,0.003849171,0.0043486487,0.0021043012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03332652,0.00017645517,0.0005481168,0.0009393628,0.0056708893,0.0081498055,0.0014037524,0.005081008,0.0056785336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048110485,0.0003955277,0.00041162065,0.00076058944,0.019365119,0.007870885,0.006108365,0.009023191,0.0007936618],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003754598,0.00003160034,0.0014920874,0.000037584312,0.000011934666,0.00012176713,0.0029504348,0.00051752117,0.00027234532,0.98125994,0.006185783,0.0070814285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009872754,0.00009292993,0.005291404,0.0004080277,0.00003075618,0.00047416164,0.0116931,0.0023619302,0.0016321793,0.83598876,0.14186174,0.00006630492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030771818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057301433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03332652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004617556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007251115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17624962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590642029","doi":"","title":"Draconian But Not Despotic: The 'Unwritten' Limits of Parliamentary Sovereignty in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Legislation; Political science; Law; Legitimacy; Sovereignty; Judicial review; Democracy; Constitutional review; Constitutionalism; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Constitution; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.011949766848870528,"score_gpt":0.24458419398108736,"score_spread":0.23263442713221683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1590642029","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3200557,0.009512424,0.0038552235,0.10854547,0.0008975609,0.00014085961,0.00033885933,0.00010219131,0.55655175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9479274,0.0018227751,0.00081905443,0.0104169585,0.000079150865,0.000025247255,0.000041091716,0.000029906469,0.038838334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891186,0.0010856095,0.00018442175,0.0008226092,0.005150541,0.0036382827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99440634,0.0021224127,0.00030748633,0.00022084916,0.0020147637,0.0009282064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040579634,0.00033772804,0.0005015377,0.0016162697,0.028087748,0.009710067,0.002064229,0.0052039763,0.0038989482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012987637,0.00044968436,0.00059678964,0.0024537842,0.014345963,0.0019216165,0.0034552389,0.007246218,0.00020113836],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052815714,0.00002426898,0.0057984125,0.000116932315,0.000039850973,0.0020388088,0.02588553,0.0010113276,0.0010950159,0.90332115,0.041448884,0.019167067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010626348,0.00008998223,0.052379802,0.00077735755,0.0003047351,0.0015304501,0.06440879,0.005456252,0.0032359099,0.087789804,0.783366,0.0005545294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9939458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12948625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12948625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13580689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9394929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591156935","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1185","title":"Judicial Review and American Constitutional Exceptionalism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Exceptionalism; Political science; Judicial activism; Law; Accountability; Judicial restraint; Politics; Constitutional review; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03989409783912067,"score_gpt":0.3084262071484708,"score_spread":0.2685321093093501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1591156935","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16589066,0.008369623,0.008459112,0.09075173,0.00065781217,0.00002709939,0.00012884785,0.00014287996,0.7255723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98684597,0.0009815189,0.0007583946,0.0046112365,0.0004659609,0.00002323267,0.000028091326,0.000013244547,0.0062723574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98892283,0.004517435,0.00043855232,0.0018362105,0.0023530293,0.0019319016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902593,0.004772045,0.0014736726,0.0010561323,0.0015889601,0.0008499099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010070289,0.0001236523,0.00051194965,0.0021008083,0.009520525,0.007807954,0.0006963378,0.0028281033,0.0025341325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01376909,0.00023921883,0.00034876898,0.0016428917,0.019751761,0.0029785198,0.0045425547,0.004166023,0.00023319523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043653927,0.000004787505,0.000475428,0.000008558426,0.000003289281,0.00003905412,0.0005907909,0.00011108754,0.00003923611,0.9933884,0.0020080856,0.003326936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026088486,0.000019568595,0.0035622995,0.00008665433,0.00001732607,0.00021717914,0.00083767,0.00068116665,0.00022360968,0.8537991,0.14050016,0.000029076069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011326114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014766491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011326114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00695748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068438556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053257465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1593573968","doi":"","title":"International Law in the Interdisciplinary Mirror","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; International law; Political science; Law; Doctrine; Dilemma; Discipline; Legal doctrine; Sociology; Legal education; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016857177677966736,"score_gpt":0.3266506288215879,"score_spread":0.30979345114362117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1593573968","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007425128,0.03232702,0.0047209165,0.04936465,0.0024033212,0.000013284531,0.00002772872,0.000048254984,0.90366966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80183387,0.026008375,0.003731543,0.016031288,0.0047935788,0.000104536855,0.000061467996,0.00012665991,0.14730872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99753416,0.0012138025,0.000076112054,0.00029357287,0.0006327902,0.00024964893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982844,0.0006562382,0.000107131724,0.00044537356,0.00025561996,0.0002512057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028091604,0.00025696796,0.0002996629,0.0016374157,0.0037277937,0.010361852,0.0005379492,0.0027753715,0.008043016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048899376,0.00017764042,0.00025896114,0.0015792812,0.014155613,0.009494669,0.0057464093,0.0034043153,0.0010327923],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012340782,0.0000037605203,0.000043503213,0.000008870326,8.855066e-7,0.00001434399,0.0011332674,0.000023395263,0.00002200661,0.98777324,0.0062223934,0.0047530336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030160454,0.000007943781,0.00026036525,0.0001378917,0.0000019689785,0.000060453825,0.0024072465,0.00009101221,0.0000499434,0.48728877,0.50968784,0.000003508805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013994477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016976666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010361852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035512233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032622633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02690661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1594513305","doi":"10.21991/c96665","title":"THE CANADIAN CHARTER AS A MODEL FOR ISRAEL'S BASIC LAWS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Appeal; Political science; Politics; Law; Phenomenon; Demographics; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.05953339464986374,"score_gpt":0.28356488204668673,"score_spread":0.224031487396823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1594513305","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010097257,0.00079414406,0.007315001,0.02124297,0.0002831389,0.00013576205,0.000757865,0.00008586904,0.959288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70536125,0.0020177015,0.020266222,0.00556307,0.00023755954,0.00033701127,0.0006677916,0.0001342429,0.26541513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955083,0.000783949,0.00007218046,0.00037416298,0.0018435838,0.0014178382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99716514,0.00038243033,0.0001039424,0.00020072103,0.0015970593,0.00055080256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032523307,0.0007361401,0.00063814025,0.003362473,0.01450829,0.012634237,0.0024689962,0.0034484514,0.01495963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004695122,0.00049214927,0.00079397426,0.0036469623,0.012089965,0.0033743153,0.0017867908,0.005972783,0.0010506955],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016236075,0.0000026642972,0.000031620235,0.0000019630857,5.438705e-7,0.000004696299,0.00013637182,0.00024066777,0.000008671036,0.99418074,0.0047462056,0.0006442235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059552647,0.000014438071,0.0014331542,0.00013257973,0.00002081203,0.000047854635,0.0016570287,0.0055674077,0.00013304075,0.58901525,0.40181565,0.000103161954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9786647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9832871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13575737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13575737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15408131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9849933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1594935521","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511493683","title":"The Migration of Constitutional Ideas","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":312,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Variety (cybernetics); Jurisprudence; Constitutional law; Politics; Comparative politics; Political science; Comparative law; Constitutional review; Law; Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.02604646980348289,"score_gpt":0.24172097091701697,"score_spread":0.2156745011135341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1594935521","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015459403,0.014855569,0.015453013,0.028458161,0.001571722,0.000048169164,0.00006016944,0.000067667606,0.9240261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77086186,0.017153982,0.010954478,0.010585253,0.0020053813,0.00031855397,0.00016396581,0.0002279592,0.18772861],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99293315,0.0036637932,0.0001940571,0.00074802805,0.0018999887,0.0005610243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971855,0.0014770419,0.00014606213,0.00078035827,0.00024066489,0.00017028984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004780385,0.00032928016,0.0004087069,0.002217416,0.0052301516,0.010278309,0.0011419599,0.002249193,0.005956914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008860955,0.00034762043,0.00036016473,0.0027655514,0.036725,0.01664081,0.0069475845,0.0071172663,0.0008046742],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012051873,0.0000020975567,0.000020615791,0.000007345075,5.235941e-7,0.000010372994,0.0018342544,0.000025686732,0.000019395391,0.9925741,0.0013805267,0.0041238135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069935404,0.000013958065,0.00023234442,0.00014039416,0.0000023061325,0.00010926819,0.003688173,0.00016609105,0.00007470078,0.6870363,0.30852363,0.0000059118743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028546955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024796145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010278309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007934526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005254717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057569265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595693753","doi":"10.1515/9780773568891-009","title":"The Activist Constitution","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitution; Praise; Politics; Law; Political science; Judicial interpretation; Constitutional interpretation; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.02287278205712687,"score_gpt":0.24517329087946538,"score_spread":0.2223005088223385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595693753","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0057761683,0.00078718725,0.002492005,0.02063319,0.00024382482,0.00002069272,0.000066541004,0.000021375103,0.969959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6971262,0.0010031462,0.0022620354,0.014336072,0.00058163714,0.00018307664,0.00013280362,0.000060103586,0.28431496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99619234,0.001347098,0.00008710921,0.0006267366,0.0011421742,0.00060448475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983065,0.0006823851,0.00013487904,0.0003116224,0.000393946,0.00017069896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033557538,0.00018925506,0.0002240638,0.0005834155,0.005930271,0.0068606124,0.0005933979,0.0030089926,0.008219312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007759273,0.00018553472,0.00015975906,0.00063499546,0.015781006,0.0020858292,0.0021865738,0.0053474545,0.00106317],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011450951,0.0000017756598,0.00002784957,0.0000028111274,3.0915103e-7,0.00000312547,0.0003651902,0.000014606298,0.000022754472,0.994325,0.0040926095,0.0011428423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013169226,0.000011124417,0.00074729556,0.00009837747,0.000004907108,0.000030757798,0.0008908234,0.00015428831,0.0002635775,0.3851994,0.61257935,0.0000068572745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020470234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032584943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020470234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00628905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009175577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045630455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1596617641","doi":"","title":"Xenophon Contiades (dir.), engineering Constitutional Change. A comparative Perspective on Europe, Canada and the USA","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Political science; Regional science; Geography; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.017113856512277804,"score_gpt":0.24573157313550262,"score_spread":0.2286177166232248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1596617641","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018761641,0.6767464,0.0005396771,0.28059915,0.019023616,0.000030075775,0.0002965365,0.000038121583,0.02085022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09057881,0.6082095,0.0012026782,0.1665821,0.02062927,0.000152611,0.00027395602,0.00017581474,0.11219536],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986363,0.00054086914,0.00007827389,0.00018945073,0.0004230006,0.00013201674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99734527,0.0020570352,0.00014363714,0.000025850455,0.00031598436,0.00011221582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021171577,0.001041064,0.00063248194,0.0022248726,0.004938463,0.003647132,0.0010813526,0.007025491,0.0054706135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030836524,0.00042086237,0.00033269086,0.00414649,0.0026844877,0.0042636264,0.0010587712,0.0057644593,0.0016758833],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008080324,0.000045207493,0.0007612725,0.00050883857,0.00002687895,0.00024143417,0.0018111916,0.0004225522,0.0001453564,0.10158486,0.85454875,0.03982282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045314835,0.000034064506,0.0039982633,0.0009797235,0.000023304134,0.00021506508,0.0026855003,0.0003412676,0.00033299468,0.03450397,0.9567762,0.00006441514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23612338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42260718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7638766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070619998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039234813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46949798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1597235307","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Reasoning in the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Constitution; Political science; Original meaning; Argument (complex analysis); Constitutional law; Context (archaeology); Meaning (existential); Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; History","score_opus":0.009949791904384914,"score_gpt":0.24641245994924177,"score_spread":0.23646266804485686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1597235307","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07704101,0.015280732,0.015747732,0.074986555,0.00076011487,0.00019575849,0.00047645616,0.00021699136,0.8152947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9367452,0.0026978308,0.006273871,0.006159363,0.00018179203,0.000062438885,0.00009007824,0.00005567461,0.04773367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98796254,0.0025334165,0.0003232454,0.0013452244,0.0047867545,0.0030488565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940626,0.0022772236,0.00029491406,0.0002738247,0.0025425083,0.00054899935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057074414,0.00034358894,0.000466303,0.003253974,0.019515917,0.017470742,0.002092464,0.0053809043,0.00447737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012661462,0.0006464022,0.00055645575,0.003925073,0.02454968,0.003002029,0.0029002193,0.005601233,0.00033909694],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004612334,0.0000019438373,0.0002897804,0.000010014604,0.0000050781855,0.000084150546,0.0025717956,0.00035892095,0.000076766155,0.9899845,0.003832249,0.0027801283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041579893,0.000014628175,0.0038520785,0.00042691492,0.0000786066,0.0001230742,0.006743499,0.00445839,0.0008019976,0.41259208,0.57065386,0.00021333262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9669753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9713558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15759553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15759553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15855877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9770698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1597968755","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.921470","title":"Three Perversities of Indian Law","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Computer science; World Wide Web; Internet privacy","score_opus":0.009749983756797937,"score_gpt":0.24091102075685153,"score_spread":0.23116103700005358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1597968755","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38470635,0.00083020696,0.0018358496,0.012845066,0.000031262985,0.000036853384,0.00014607608,0.00005550131,0.5995129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961195,0.00010583227,0.0001296276,0.00024669594,0.000019087352,0.00001192769,0.000013010015,0.0000077540235,0.003346681],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972167,0.0007586608,0.00006880377,0.0002800494,0.00082447636,0.00085122423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992564,0.0035742694,0.0009929175,0.0012835999,0.0008056787,0.0007794892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021455174,0.0002060805,0.00028608224,0.0036922318,0.0097466055,0.009206729,0.0014129578,0.0016802017,0.007828882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00915144,0.00024369989,0.00035939776,0.004586001,0.036590766,0.004438291,0.0052775554,0.0045528146,0.00045953097],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017282495,0.000021398135,0.0036924428,0.00001655047,0.000004237698,0.00006468565,0.014297608,0.00005236615,0.00010063735,0.9775695,0.00062987546,0.0035334246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022866678,0.000044066248,0.050669316,0.00012544953,0.000052803607,0.00048634966,0.07496015,0.00048233295,0.0006325273,0.82888156,0.043593153,0.00004938392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020721298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037814043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020721298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063787512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061385166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046281338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1598033492","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1151","title":"A Tale of Two Maps: The Limits of Universalism in Comparative Judicial Review","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Comparative law; Skepticism; Legitimacy; Judicial review; Political science; Polity; Public law; Scholarship; Judicial activism; Constitutional law; Judicial independence; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06963996063123865,"score_gpt":0.35813759444947346,"score_spread":0.2884976338182348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1598033492","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026376167,0.11087363,0.07435592,0.5905889,0.0045714295,0.00011144725,0.00019304089,0.00021612093,0.1927134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8313909,0.036158204,0.048385456,0.054832783,0.011241247,0.00047202306,0.00013754195,0.00043242262,0.016949384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9737785,0.020855533,0.00051513506,0.0016821562,0.0024284772,0.0007401784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94213825,0.046527233,0.0012672554,0.005356773,0.0036769048,0.0010336153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031355757,0.00048101292,0.0012539463,0.006465073,0.00715156,0.0142777655,0.0019732313,0.0048432187,0.0049387277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.067194834,0.0005770953,0.00072543806,0.004225979,0.07114425,0.037722416,0.0073631792,0.008718676,0.0005007471],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020927824,0.0000076174474,0.00022311391,0.0000665246,0.000010019165,0.000031559055,0.0036972743,0.00007538476,0.000033448818,0.97858363,0.0061876313,0.011062831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015641379,0.000017098835,0.00040772208,0.00018632392,0.0000060786174,0.000053525844,0.002396197,0.00019886544,0.00006112191,0.95102096,0.045621898,0.000014561056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039334283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004108259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031355757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004824332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003721475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16582704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1598251110","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1255","title":"Does the Observer Have an Effect?: An Analysis of the Use of the Dialogue Metaphor in Canada's Courts","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Legislature; Charter; Normative; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03993620394470653,"score_gpt":0.276923128913568,"score_spread":0.23698692496886148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1598251110","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33052728,0.003912296,0.004705302,0.038397092,0.00027799234,0.00010317362,0.00024583584,0.00006133904,0.62176967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98845714,0.0005379344,0.00043132334,0.0015524183,0.000024418938,0.000026775997,0.000022554705,0.000026275362,0.008921206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932168,0.0029676047,0.00008162859,0.00038974365,0.0016179858,0.001726355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937034,0.0030641218,0.00043387074,0.00015617172,0.0019673721,0.0006750084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034528854,0.00040018646,0.0004671465,0.0026875252,0.033586998,0.014609964,0.0021071255,0.0037414196,0.0044530616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010847702,0.00028485424,0.00042326393,0.0052956445,0.029210674,0.0039246893,0.00409217,0.003716599,0.0002742543],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033360113,0.000025105306,0.0032068666,0.0000711715,0.000008192738,0.0006237526,0.38802442,0.00020402481,0.0003593915,0.5911951,0.008978406,0.0072702146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027107999,0.00002867684,0.021713817,0.00047455617,0.00006621314,0.00025294942,0.7340776,0.0018796864,0.00057018065,0.03789779,0.20291142,0.00010004296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9616195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96601194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9616195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10623971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.080156416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77082664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1598579609","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Rights and New Technologies. A Comparative Study","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Fundamental rights; Emerging technologies; Constitutional law; Human rights; Law; Constitutional right; Constitutional review; Constitutional economics; Law and economics; Sociology; Constitution; Computer science","score_opus":0.07508775222730958,"score_gpt":0.31227479861683555,"score_spread":0.23718704638952598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1598579609","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03263262,0.16601852,0.0019834386,0.014866805,0.0004523775,0.00001976567,0.0002170649,0.000014807277,0.7837945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84034175,0.099866845,0.00096833706,0.0014878119,0.0007083512,0.000067841494,0.00021439564,0.000037491867,0.05630725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968656,0.0015948171,0.000085121304,0.00023447516,0.00072005077,0.0005000142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947226,0.0040473896,0.0004329816,0.00017589076,0.00041230608,0.00020890213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020071846,0.0003165914,0.0003678856,0.0037417943,0.0029490092,0.006750061,0.00051488396,0.0018387318,0.01300453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0079393685,0.0001969954,0.00038434006,0.008678554,0.01038606,0.008625866,0.0020793334,0.0015184863,0.0007119366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010500026,0.000016265565,0.00051122945,0.000115422496,0.0000062305826,0.000064787724,0.0025680503,0.00022002199,0.000027505359,0.97208947,0.0071308343,0.017239679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024175062,0.000042868585,0.010577718,0.0011625673,0.00002233609,0.00034039785,0.015275704,0.00039254202,0.00016604085,0.36773908,0.6042363,0.000020348918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016104892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01992659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016104892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009113676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030318967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06612462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1598964383","doi":"10.5539/ass.v11n16p315","title":"The Role of the Constitutional Council of the Republic of Kazakhstan on Human Rights","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Social Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Human rights; Law; Political science; Fundamental rights; Legitimacy; Parliament; Constitutional court; Enforcement; International human rights law; Politics","score_opus":0.06800841130425986,"score_gpt":0.31312667115698833,"score_spread":0.24511825985272848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1598964383","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10012735,0.030928347,0.020035537,0.12144438,0.013619378,0.0011289213,0.002279154,0.0017379441,0.708699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79118514,0.0060643055,0.015263207,0.019191915,0.002145259,0.00042689918,0.001386955,0.0002537223,0.16408256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99209315,0.0024993299,0.0007572828,0.0011185772,0.0017856304,0.0017461319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99004936,0.0028859018,0.00081748184,0.0011912123,0.00356745,0.0014886158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009543773,0.00036611612,0.0005856954,0.0019504933,0.007230953,0.010169879,0.0013100043,0.003498358,0.0116432775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01288101,0.00038164813,0.0002910899,0.0021256316,0.0063622347,0.0026773112,0.0038051305,0.00409989,0.0024729208],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000939812,0.000040296145,0.0028362293,0.00026832387,0.000029860283,0.0005566123,0.0063747037,0.000569893,0.0023720171,0.80044675,0.109268546,0.077142864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023753277,0.00003026555,0.004918685,0.00015651977,0.000025421505,0.00021301939,0.0013532358,0.00021896041,0.00074045314,0.01620314,0.9760705,0.00004613436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036970586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026278248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036970586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0094497055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029598102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073510766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599635435","doi":"","title":"Lawyers and the Rule of Law: Independence of the Bar, the Canadian Constitution and the Law Governing Lawyers","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Judicial independence; Political science; Independence (probability theory); Rule of law; Constitutional law; Constitution; Legal profession; Common law; Public law; Supreme court; Politics","score_opus":0.007080557357979105,"score_gpt":0.22679428997788248,"score_spread":0.21971373261990337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1599635435","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05490866,0.015852695,0.007581731,0.15520966,0.0005850458,0.00006213385,0.00019969372,0.000059130994,0.76554126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9256919,0.0058437292,0.0033819992,0.01432146,0.00032778055,0.000034061017,0.00007787571,0.000039739116,0.050281566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927651,0.000961024,0.00015769264,0.0006852763,0.0030515017,0.0023795273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99462295,0.0022324838,0.0004515652,0.00027202978,0.0015017046,0.0009193683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038404763,0.00032502037,0.00042459875,0.0022609744,0.020220706,0.015002974,0.0018763035,0.0052004033,0.005663973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008739009,0.0004610421,0.0005064105,0.0022551215,0.04943765,0.0050855153,0.0039684214,0.0076881936,0.00039385387],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004459257,0.000005178782,0.00039536983,0.000014288797,0.0000022972115,0.00005134035,0.0023596152,0.0000931943,0.000055541597,0.99050456,0.0026976464,0.0038164975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052018448,0.000031537304,0.016784437,0.00048790392,0.000058535177,0.00014832559,0.0081817815,0.0011334125,0.00048748183,0.5236278,0.448847,0.0001597359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96954095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.977413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08037516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08037516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11279224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5831653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1600717849","doi":"","title":"Troubling Patterns in Canadian Refugee Adjudication","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"York University Digital Library (York University)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Adjudication; Immigration; Political science; Appeal; Law; Refugee law; Legislation; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.02184454622439672,"score_gpt":0.18784776473571071,"score_spread":0.166003218511314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1600717849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90612835,0.004964721,0.0059595853,0.02729634,0.00047094407,0.00044146235,0.0046617733,0.0001749732,0.049901772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811291,0.0017185365,0.003102051,0.0029355083,0.00006108735,0.00013821179,0.0016039747,0.000076379365,0.009235123],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.94010115,0.009206452,0.0051309397,0.0055404,0.030899145,0.009121844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91989803,0.02408214,0.017359115,0.006231991,0.028236121,0.004192584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030801335,0.00039418406,0.0007271833,0.010723249,0.012715905,0.0053023705,0.0037714948,0.0014784265,0.0024646595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09274129,0.00073605037,0.0006412516,0.015254981,0.0050097494,0.0012000861,0.00570801,0.0022321132,0.0003753069],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003417551,0.0001078524,0.5259948,0.0007368498,0.00020631068,0.0015871784,0.18702894,0.0009095062,0.0028079909,0.051896762,0.04222099,0.18616109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022959644,0.00005394352,0.81809783,0.00047721443,0.00006193892,0.00054326875,0.06491357,0.00092188135,0.0017266073,0.0028301133,0.11010785,0.00024277512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95100224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9819948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05351767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05351767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05394438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3882997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1600825248","doi":"10.19092/reed.v1i1.13","title":"Novos Horizontes Epistemológicos para a Pesquisa Empírica em Direito: \"Descentrar\" o Sujeito, \"Entrevistar\" o Sistema e Dessubstancializar as Categorias Jurídicas","year":2014,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.034618896274517266,"score_gpt":0.30596290252507674,"score_spread":0.2713440062505595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1600825248","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04478005,0.022160513,0.38807017,0.109228425,0.0035479462,0.00022381879,0.0005485658,0.00031702296,0.4311235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8029751,0.015290878,0.13065554,0.0068857926,0.0015611858,0.00057570625,0.00044991038,0.00035839583,0.041247424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882108,0.006704571,0.00063165155,0.0016703615,0.0021277638,0.0006547989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9829296,0.008935684,0.0014559757,0.0032574914,0.002270114,0.001151144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0146160675,0.0014748247,0.0013162488,0.0039650262,0.007605773,0.021035314,0.0029673257,0.0056794053,0.010950159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015130215,0.0011193713,0.0015515094,0.0029784448,0.05008144,0.026895126,0.010818556,0.011692646,0.0020310064],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009399789,0.000009220162,0.00019109383,0.00007265884,0.0000075273865,0.000053384825,0.0045036003,0.0001366172,0.00008735957,0.9912477,0.00073570834,0.0029457773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001184534,0.000017403336,0.000354408,0.00034841764,0.00001610367,0.000095808224,0.00555249,0.00060049415,0.00021667077,0.93948513,0.053276274,0.00002507266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004615093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006693926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021035314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00902691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011701533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077298105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1600854381","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.987822","title":"Supreme Court Justices and Supreme Court Nominations: Do Nomination Battles Affect the Decisions of Sitting Justices?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Fraser Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Nomination; Voting; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Supreme Court Decisions; Politics; Majority opinion; Roberts Court; Concurring opinion; Court of record; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.023015022620416763,"score_gpt":0.3161520942857633,"score_spread":0.2931370716653465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1600854381","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9750645,0.00033297463,0.00018274787,0.0033190227,0.00008070319,0.000014205318,0.0000684778,0.000004207221,0.020933215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99849856,0.000049290902,0.000033657005,0.0002224449,0.000046255926,0.0000037035966,0.000025856492,0.0000040617515,0.0011161295],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934349,0.0034865872,0.00021769952,0.00039858802,0.00067553815,0.0017867753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.894483,0.06904566,0.019459764,0.0016460398,0.004898932,0.010466583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00593945,0.0002125521,0.0005603072,0.0013629373,0.00457338,0.0065740487,0.0009223849,0.0021866956,0.018873673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09321223,0.00034649548,0.00028180453,0.0014476514,0.0026196165,0.002951131,0.0016790793,0.003908184,0.0019557015],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016803818,0.0009983382,0.90231717,0.000110680034,0.0002376611,0.0011831794,0.024630541,0.00074787124,0.0013032134,0.022745319,0.007786545,0.03625917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008669577,0.0002639976,0.94612765,0.000075774195,0.00008256679,0.00018526113,0.03599983,0.0008838807,0.00036144673,0.011922478,0.003966732,0.000043658023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0107852435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025424672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018873673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011742153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013713653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063138664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1601493943","doi":"","title":"Boundaries of Judicial Review: The Law of Justiciability in Canada, Second Edition","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Law; Political science; Judicial review","score_opus":0.017870824269250827,"score_gpt":0.2686591233230105,"score_spread":0.25078829905375966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1601493943","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018766097,0.24407144,0.00695343,0.10814655,0.014444155,0.00021649893,0.0016103971,0.00037433856,0.62230664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09088344,0.1771895,0.008804675,0.056616325,0.012159602,0.000448074,0.0013333153,0.0005048619,0.65206015],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99163646,0.00070812064,0.00027738363,0.00037919322,0.0061052926,0.0008936173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99106663,0.0027880245,0.00031619295,0.0003749481,0.0049503963,0.00050390494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035860213,0.0007459966,0.0007107859,0.0033302514,0.0064808717,0.010475886,0.0027844843,0.004446467,0.013289623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016412329,0.00074490695,0.00039797305,0.0052581583,0.011440293,0.0042991634,0.00174092,0.0045225415,0.0030772868],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008019222,0.000009255145,0.00021483743,0.00015356317,0.000004844729,0.000054195898,0.0011575195,0.00036504585,0.00009370437,0.2852593,0.68920606,0.023473669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047282238,0.0000039228867,0.0008947581,0.0003275139,0.000003693835,0.000045129054,0.0003481931,0.00020697649,0.000036257858,0.034359556,0.96375,0.00001923412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81106466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89480454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18893534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05786441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09847436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41983765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1602421040","doi":"","title":"Canada's Unfathomable Unwritten Constitutional Principles","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitution; Judicial independence; Charter; Legitimacy; Separation of powers; Judicial review; Substantive due process; Independence (probability theory); Supreme court; Politics","score_opus":0.01147431975176556,"score_gpt":0.1861799023430638,"score_spread":0.17470558259129826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1602421040","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061905243,0.012911911,0.008214859,0.3460028,0.001099419,0.00013030852,0.00084590196,0.00017425005,0.56871533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8702052,0.006728151,0.006808967,0.03273667,0.0003633702,0.00007918254,0.00020769094,0.00007842873,0.08279232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98133457,0.0020371675,0.0004973038,0.0014022428,0.011674552,0.0030541886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98232204,0.008092517,0.0008249634,0.0013028882,0.006345184,0.001112328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0094036525,0.00034452605,0.00043085087,0.0021469216,0.022259884,0.015362038,0.002192493,0.0042940103,0.0025786883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028766248,0.00057491905,0.00033579613,0.0027121296,0.02635742,0.0025512874,0.003091762,0.008786523,0.00026699592],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004835164,0.000005524238,0.00055795175,0.000026859756,0.0000037046616,0.00008214195,0.005777381,0.00022776816,0.00011763375,0.96656376,0.018495308,0.008137124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004492673,0.000027093498,0.012716308,0.0004857065,0.000040938885,0.00017811997,0.0062199957,0.0016228697,0.0008505242,0.25940672,0.71826017,0.00014663755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96749073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98550224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08014051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08014051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19776234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5814628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1603337498","doi":"10.21991/c9b952","title":"THE PREAMBLE, JUDICIAL INDEPENDANCE AND JUDICIAL INTEGRITY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Preamble; Political science; Law; Computer science; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.04632287987767642,"score_gpt":0.28452991552726187,"score_spread":0.23820703564958545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1603337498","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12757707,0.02100592,0.016761115,0.11580243,0.0010578164,0.00009355728,0.00020471028,0.0000298591,0.71746755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768638,0.0022629488,0.0019819746,0.0046429927,0.0006630052,0.00011122011,0.00003947322,0.0000199385,0.013414581],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945478,0.0027176677,0.0003344204,0.00065803545,0.00072891527,0.0010131671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98230594,0.011889892,0.0019431902,0.0013782542,0.0016216178,0.0008611809],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077862404,0.00034062122,0.0007731775,0.0015643366,0.0091982735,0.008939563,0.0014890693,0.0074312137,0.0058898292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02201927,0.00047976463,0.0005429384,0.0016756776,0.03814598,0.012134537,0.004722807,0.012530717,0.0006710974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013701137,0.000011649892,0.00012472343,0.00001250842,0.0000028353386,0.000030517029,0.001036234,0.00004039038,0.00004242664,0.9955778,0.0014650115,0.0016422371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031114545,0.000025177633,0.0011978728,0.00010065522,0.000010214114,0.000073624644,0.0015614597,0.00011204769,0.00012425955,0.976948,0.01979558,0.000020025669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057275714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007947745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0091982735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024992109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057293912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041178107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1603399318","doi":"10.21991/c9637h","title":"Conacher Missed the Mark on Constitutional Conventions and Fixed Election Dates","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Appeal; Statute; Convention; Political science; Constitution; Jurisprudence; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.0370479173186611,"score_gpt":0.29106634295021544,"score_spread":0.25401842563155436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1603399318","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02105521,0.009591213,0.018614208,0.70706683,0.007059553,0.00010813565,0.0003807506,0.00016583322,0.23595822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60357267,0.005327073,0.010778675,0.26851723,0.0041268575,0.00020677694,0.00013072987,0.00031451482,0.10702545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9824471,0.005568757,0.00076536107,0.0032380458,0.005653956,0.0023268226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97199136,0.020767694,0.0006297028,0.0013176498,0.004164476,0.0011289999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014624998,0.00059434253,0.00081421965,0.0021917662,0.020645078,0.013308062,0.003105152,0.013629249,0.0060985703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03997867,0.00072617363,0.0005404173,0.0019938736,0.044106133,0.01632464,0.0060392185,0.03393024,0.0010267685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071813256,0.0000044573026,0.000103414495,0.000017399581,0.0000016181368,0.00002952261,0.0020056507,0.00004893646,0.000052567444,0.9664366,0.026120787,0.005171815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023453811,0.000026598733,0.00073563715,0.0003792867,0.000012526353,0.00011245264,0.004501979,0.0005101376,0.00071983685,0.29712242,0.6957664,0.00008921308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41613626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49298286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41613626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029816872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031089999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82742816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1603622049","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-27717-7_39","title":"Difference, Dissent, and Community Identity: Striking the Balance in Rights Theory and Jurisprudence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Political science; Optimal distinctiveness theory; Politics; Law; Democracy; Dissent; Human rights; Sociology; Law and economics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.028927346136588247,"score_gpt":0.2925722239494264,"score_spread":0.26364487781283813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1603622049","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13517027,0.01635501,0.023979694,0.122066185,0.001136586,0.000058965605,0.000048674123,0.000045093246,0.7011395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97990566,0.001458867,0.0026979337,0.0024391697,0.0004584255,0.00005562775,0.000017948494,0.00003229007,0.012934068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939209,0.0038691468,0.00012032797,0.0005560037,0.001077275,0.00045627358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932594,0.005462835,0.00024500594,0.0004833592,0.0002654588,0.0002839044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077961893,0.00040690188,0.0007913566,0.0016716532,0.006867069,0.008514221,0.001887536,0.004798609,0.004833023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012545616,0.00024254044,0.00032640685,0.0017835889,0.08205429,0.014407841,0.006374132,0.0068641254,0.00033098535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041460794,0.000007359366,0.00005554709,0.0000075406733,8.6244705e-7,0.000009916473,0.0029166029,0.00002805719,0.000021527008,0.9932892,0.00067659013,0.0029825992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006725019,0.000003149474,0.00013425753,0.00002271905,9.652636e-7,0.000012598449,0.0024414079,0.00010888028,0.00004600259,0.9912947,0.0059255483,0.0000030455349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024048141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004366547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008514221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003067462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003359775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04123068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1604118981","doi":"10.1111/j.1469-8129.2008.00324.x","title":"Recognition or imposition? Federalism, national minorities, and the Supreme Court of Canada<sup>†</sup>","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nations and Nationalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Conestoga College","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; New Federalism; Law; Dialogical self; Cooperative federalism; Political science; Dual federalism; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03778319695283374,"score_gpt":0.2744087037273356,"score_spread":0.23662550677450186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1604118981","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16580312,0.026222022,0.00213261,0.29498136,0.000775239,0.000038550028,0.00029104794,0.000041733834,0.50971437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97374934,0.0022472974,0.00039520836,0.01060053,0.00012615426,0.000011887584,0.000033656426,0.000008284993,0.012827553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956809,0.0008076016,0.0000864284,0.00036313824,0.0013426432,0.0017192069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99595743,0.001742831,0.00027447176,0.00012306291,0.0014293032,0.0004727432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003449212,0.00015215456,0.0003674827,0.0011621431,0.016470175,0.008263528,0.0014539853,0.0037807655,0.0030902354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069616097,0.00015737083,0.0002652872,0.0019317579,0.016290262,0.0019473993,0.00181081,0.0040165014,0.00015514012],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061040087,0.0000039640377,0.000985131,0.000015118693,0.0000036894387,0.00006462326,0.0019440708,0.0001443688,0.000053985023,0.9849926,0.008712347,0.0030740385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004756325,0.000030361129,0.023019938,0.0008370096,0.00010047462,0.00018617195,0.020095956,0.0026593057,0.0010471863,0.41603112,0.53579473,0.00015014771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97418094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98228616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.090513855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.090513855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10561257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6567271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1605254849","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1249","title":"Parliamentary Engagement with the Charter: Rethinking the Idea of Legislative Rights Review","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Charter; Political science; Legislation; Law; Bill of rights; Law and economics; Public administration; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.0621211467014886,"score_gpt":0.32157001392960227,"score_spread":0.25944886722811367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1605254849","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017053232,0.022650879,0.045932375,0.6073757,0.0047373334,0.0002864535,0.00022077959,0.00024243894,0.3015009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7945076,0.011865729,0.028999966,0.09630578,0.0040013297,0.0003061385,0.0001216186,0.00034466176,0.06354706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8973071,0.05313024,0.0035172454,0.0077211703,0.03058457,0.0077398117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8434159,0.09556971,0.0046912055,0.008621505,0.0426532,0.0050484706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.083043985,0.00046029515,0.0012626222,0.0062208027,0.021020865,0.033276826,0.004395169,0.016049188,0.0030123433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12621462,0.00085851,0.0008769801,0.006304239,0.07509599,0.015066286,0.0067928657,0.018999262,0.000633949],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008993539,0.0000058437304,0.0002486543,0.000042898286,0.0000066099274,0.000054181633,0.004156568,0.0001676572,0.0000839412,0.9745472,0.010952666,0.00972491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049458096,0.00003687076,0.0022439924,0.00079114543,0.000070572416,0.00011115874,0.0036970126,0.0013968489,0.0007760393,0.3025542,0.6881131,0.00015962451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73734045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.76818085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26265955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.101107106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1773172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7335868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1605711693","doi":"10.21991/c9bq1p","title":"Canada's Re-emerging Division of Powers and the Unrealized Force of Reciprocal Interjurisdictional Immunity","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Political science; Supreme court; Reciprocal; Separation of powers; Government (linguistics); Law; Law and economics; Qualified immunity; Public administration; Sociology; Constitution","score_opus":0.0235577028077574,"score_gpt":0.2628474321849137,"score_spread":0.23928972937715628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1605711693","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15888976,0.0072188107,0.007134994,0.22860254,0.000738072,0.000050086706,0.00022873127,0.00010973966,0.59702736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9676893,0.0011503967,0.0012375397,0.0077077104,0.00007448881,0.000011299063,0.000021736812,0.00001988272,0.022087626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99559695,0.0004688203,0.00007526175,0.000579744,0.0018162713,0.0014630787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99745756,0.0007479418,0.00014482846,0.00018532165,0.00087236776,0.0005919027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028409667,0.00017641143,0.00030986397,0.0009221169,0.017620329,0.009842623,0.0014168627,0.0037105246,0.0031317393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063974317,0.00025279843,0.00028369206,0.0013872974,0.02323543,0.0024326572,0.002905004,0.006424227,0.00016533905],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056290933,0.0000025646725,0.00038552287,0.000011337296,0.0000026257023,0.0000568218,0.0027640096,0.00010463106,0.00009421066,0.9880014,0.004440027,0.004131281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000075817836,0.000029084174,0.009998244,0.00031160016,0.000055699627,0.00026824942,0.014972807,0.0019194522,0.0009363436,0.39394212,0.5773823,0.00010828158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9727629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98735565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.096676834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.096676834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14308281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70144284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1606111470","doi":"10.21991/c9395w","title":"CANADIAN CONSTITUTIONALISM AND SOVEREIGNTY AFTER NAFTA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Sovereignty; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.027503341842709927,"score_gpt":0.24695094003863108,"score_spread":0.21944759819592116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1606111470","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26428965,0.010556626,0.000511691,0.098550655,0.0006937276,0.00007607443,0.002661476,0.000051491912,0.6226086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93506753,0.00332173,0.00035109164,0.0043154294,0.00013690323,0.000032277734,0.0004782053,0.000031416683,0.056265354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99164987,0.00046786029,0.0001654201,0.0005830228,0.003014139,0.004119759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9845755,0.0026773168,0.0008331533,0.00047415768,0.009625013,0.0018149924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004840099,0.0003452448,0.0008343339,0.004516288,0.031564005,0.0132512795,0.0019706076,0.004182395,0.021273835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022401718,0.0005052225,0.0012750978,0.010075737,0.010628105,0.0040593008,0.0039847484,0.008492977,0.00045064813],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013914284,0.0000462414,0.014221475,0.00009549813,0.000080216574,0.00025242553,0.01240127,0.0009462505,0.00016959175,0.91139054,0.04578306,0.014474396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002187248,0.000060590155,0.2024481,0.00053356803,0.00036728376,0.00017344982,0.036031723,0.0014102239,0.0006499218,0.11926648,0.63842297,0.00041689875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9987808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25897315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.25897315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2630101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8594861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1606378390","doi":"10.7202/1020661ar","title":"Jimena Andino Dorato, Jean-Frédérick Ménard et Lionel Smith (dir.), Le droit civil et ses codes : parcours à travers les Amériques, Montréal, Éditions Thémis, 2011, 212 p., ISBN 978-2-8940029-1-9.","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Humanities; Cartography; Geography","score_opus":0.011977558326932534,"score_gpt":0.23569867991011337,"score_spread":0.22372112158318083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1606378390","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040715866,0.90267867,0.00051799277,0.059280217,0.008042363,0.000014179317,0.0002871695,0.00008064633,0.02869155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010027936,0.7839544,0.0011240495,0.01115973,0.007227795,0.000060247654,0.0004100738,0.000195403,0.18584038],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859744,0.0003991868,0.00006529789,0.00021152121,0.0005898282,0.00013668588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982261,0.00081743003,0.00024659344,0.000046538305,0.0004361036,0.00022725096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019108097,0.0012375719,0.0007945116,0.0023405657,0.0019852067,0.0047635683,0.001085589,0.0027252133,0.048695587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035715746,0.0008595502,0.00032687615,0.004182937,0.001499812,0.0060832566,0.0013098059,0.0034858317,0.029697161],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017280616,0.000006453853,0.00016841583,0.000356819,0.0000047370836,0.00003537521,0.0005925005,0.000025730811,0.00008772566,0.0051180497,0.94942224,0.044164598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042580455,0.0000038583016,0.0010266339,0.00026825696,0.0000039478778,0.00008141019,0.00059200043,0.000020941212,0.000052356798,0.0012286033,0.9967085,0.00000922724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06066811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16367136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06066811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004813554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040718256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16290301},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1607777141","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139167109.003","title":"The Rule of Law as the Rule of Liberal Principle","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rule of law; Law; Due process; Political science; Public law; Ideal (ethics); Law and economics; Private law; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03987001941949147,"score_gpt":0.2607157570756059,"score_spread":0.22084573765611443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1607777141","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036222772,0.0040315767,0.017009852,0.022606486,0.0007535975,0.000025086494,0.00007734941,0.000054777953,0.95181894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6603153,0.004323349,0.014794773,0.01329613,0.0025541303,0.0002306494,0.0001472447,0.00021898051,0.3041194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99433523,0.0023197893,0.00017791956,0.0008326823,0.0017212755,0.0006130879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963169,0.0020160805,0.00018943334,0.00074787525,0.0005787734,0.00015084892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004791109,0.0003447725,0.0005644323,0.0009331204,0.0032356493,0.010528992,0.0012141007,0.00482757,0.0075237653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009377211,0.00036781668,0.00058200205,0.00094040926,0.02614924,0.007604391,0.0024457288,0.008421558,0.002578807],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.229568e-7,0.0000011054435,0.0000063848315,0.0000035535243,4.2659926e-7,0.0000037284822,0.000086650434,0.000029146358,0.000010603463,0.99759644,0.0015792969,0.0006819219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039976567,0.000002610363,0.00003136697,0.000019790015,0.0000012628719,0.000011967794,0.000065807806,0.00012787445,0.000039953065,0.96064633,0.039046366,0.0000025842608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051059406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004871882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010528992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042801406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005745429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031054676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W161486715","doi":"10.21991/c9cq2c","title":"CONSTITUTIONAL LIMBO IN TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO (THE UNCERTAINTY, NOT THE DANCE)*","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Variety (cybernetics); Dance; Style (visual arts); Politics; Constitutional crisis; Law; Political science; History; Art; Archaeology; Computer science; Literature","score_opus":0.05186781107398396,"score_gpt":0.28046183798764945,"score_spread":0.22859402691366548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W161486715","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69399214,0.0057415674,0.00066410564,0.03183217,0.00019877072,0.00006599774,0.0002769104,0.000027060245,0.26720124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98368144,0.0006368598,0.00020702218,0.0011315302,0.000009918281,0.00002878175,0.000062893545,0.0000070271467,0.014234419],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990006,0.00030325964,0.00001717965,0.00007241736,0.00008123032,0.00052532856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991867,0.0002934863,0.00011264946,0.00006487745,0.00013496255,0.00020729745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012723076,0.00014217568,0.00020805045,0.0010870022,0.009283991,0.003678287,0.0006413898,0.0012118967,0.0050541493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002631106,0.00016885228,0.000107289394,0.0020671005,0.01023487,0.0012974612,0.003800858,0.0024680195,0.00014104763],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011078193,0.000042885422,0.014143974,0.00016547834,0.00001144777,0.0014859526,0.12504713,0.00080062886,0.0008825962,0.81148654,0.013239663,0.032582983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055632943,0.000075251635,0.122872986,0.00083081174,0.000020609195,0.0005474456,0.31309798,0.0006387787,0.00052383443,0.101515435,0.45971817,0.000103069186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6916855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8736091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6916855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02967055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021813162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6202605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1615853112","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2473557","title":"Legal Principles Governing the Disqualification of Judges","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02067695888745726,"score_gpt":0.28108570515663084,"score_spread":0.2604087462691736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1615853112","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07098387,0.0028458962,0.11988114,0.1297168,0.002950428,0.0020049282,0.0007398128,0.00031713588,0.67055994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8717549,0.00066541554,0.049936976,0.02987474,0.0016332438,0.0016037747,0.00019487878,0.0001761905,0.04415991],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9063542,0.02853047,0.009533857,0.014768227,0.024872653,0.015940527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90537715,0.05697345,0.006919525,0.011319761,0.015706642,0.0037034051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08716616,0.0009118123,0.0023577216,0.003308307,0.0162629,0.020168258,0.009323634,0.03153592,0.0053978553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1609797,0.0024990102,0.0022112182,0.0020737841,0.041188844,0.009058337,0.005926025,0.03436236,0.001965606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010664471,0.000027691123,0.0002486022,0.000019219111,0.000009370033,0.000042360363,0.0014868043,0.00015174257,0.000112285714,0.99198943,0.0037143198,0.0021874565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012767334,0.000050675273,0.001232473,0.00024565175,0.000043616794,0.000108240114,0.0010233304,0.00087846577,0.00078988663,0.9590569,0.036372524,0.0000704739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020803923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03687597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08716616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008648523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03331455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46098423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1616620563","doi":"","title":"Principled Expediency: How the Irish Courts Can Compromise on Same-Sex Marriage","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Politics; Supreme court; Appeal; Law; Political science; Adjudication; Irish; Constitutional court; Legislature; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; Constitution; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028588200291334475,"score_gpt":0.286308973757233,"score_spread":0.25772077346589856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1616620563","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018405387,0.0009947576,0.011480884,0.03768794,0.00064238755,0.00008244263,0.000026488367,0.000083402665,0.9305963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8182345,0.0013474686,0.012189581,0.022068355,0.0005635354,0.00021957268,0.000052970936,0.00027543004,0.14504859],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852599,0.0059706448,0.00032613304,0.0017724826,0.002459816,0.004211071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99514896,0.0020468582,0.0002732733,0.0007385084,0.0009689095,0.0008235574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016596306,0.0006702135,0.0006730696,0.0015190374,0.01714351,0.025780283,0.004082773,0.010438445,0.017667405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022703713,0.00066455087,0.001365329,0.001195577,0.041361928,0.014283921,0.016451903,0.014258995,0.003909054],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020852893,0.000019214101,0.00030472327,0.000014751252,0.000006787035,0.00025483515,0.004826603,0.0006089751,0.00006744981,0.97994137,0.007928449,0.006006094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069169524,0.000036155532,0.00035641887,0.00018270811,0.000025286912,0.00016250026,0.00904088,0.0018281193,0.00030619046,0.7953631,0.19255866,0.00007086536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04340144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0639433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04340144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019192833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01774519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13925439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W16205292","doi":"10.1097/01.olq.0000180565.54023.bf","title":"Legislative Scrutiny and the Charter of Rights: A Review of Senate Practices and Procedures","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Charter; Legislature; Parliament; Legislation; Political science; Law; Public administration; Situated; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.062418534794266844,"score_gpt":0.37229742874776744,"score_spread":0.3098788939535006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W16205292","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005430231,0.98933,0.00011293287,0.0036650968,0.00018061514,0.000022704273,0.00005840888,0.0000033840736,0.0060838093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009312242,0.9882782,0.00028851474,0.0011845924,0.00010138643,0.000044605713,0.000042557185,0.0000038974963,0.0007439307],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9828295,0.008333444,0.0016784396,0.0006052008,0.005830089,0.0007232467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9690262,0.016878618,0.0033907644,0.0009079882,0.009476,0.00032048675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025715427,0.00065182743,0.0017560926,0.010742608,0.002856739,0.0042452137,0.0018177849,0.0019523463,0.0024325878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045556348,0.0006702339,0.00083406124,0.023650017,0.0062422915,0.002792557,0.0017705086,0.0021330086,0.00048690845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012015547,0.00004260042,0.00218752,0.042485464,0.000318964,0.0002903872,0.0043791956,0.00054928515,0.00044142889,0.097191446,0.10708557,0.7449079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018913863,0.000047551985,0.007799671,0.046774257,0.00025959025,0.00022300296,0.0014611307,0.000059549715,0.00033468107,0.0042614657,0.9387188,0.000041345807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19925156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3396308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98656034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01343965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06860478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39618355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W162727026","doi":"","title":"Proportionnalité et droits fondamentaux : recherches comparées sur le travail du juge américain au regard des expériences canadienne, sud-africaine et de la Cour européenne des droits de l'homme","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"theses.fr (ABES)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Legitimacy; Jurisprudence; Doctrine; Constitutional theory; Proportionality (law); Constitutional law; Politics","score_opus":0.07137677875976556,"score_gpt":0.33062838770954056,"score_spread":0.259251608949775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W162727026","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3987774,0.007619605,0.00382739,0.0044944054,0.00008854157,0.000032120584,0.00007595271,0.000022204425,0.5850624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97363865,0.0019598282,0.0005282368,0.0002199074,0.000028007085,0.00003734515,0.000024494908,0.000017883298,0.023545612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962962,0.0018279891,0.000083618244,0.00044731484,0.0009606671,0.00038418418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99376833,0.00409913,0.00086012523,0.0003320129,0.0006316615,0.00030876606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036170562,0.0002786461,0.00028084777,0.0021389236,0.0061115674,0.010521603,0.000771581,0.0010881564,0.009700149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0098492885,0.00017941315,0.00021232259,0.00403658,0.016147418,0.005807535,0.004186953,0.0018262393,0.00048153542],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006544187,0.000040148967,0.0088338135,0.000116592666,0.000014927076,0.0001727933,0.33584777,0.0002363474,0.0003384045,0.61537725,0.0016318075,0.037324708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020698024,0.00008875953,0.0593185,0.0010274666,0.000032883865,0.0005220153,0.466214,0.0006396582,0.0010092772,0.12499458,0.3460737,0.000058469523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028342871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038895663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97165716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007982793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049637454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057919443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1652167591","doi":"10.21991/c9ft08","title":"BEADS AND TRINKETS TAKE ON NEW FORM IN FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL PROPOSALS FOR ABORIGINAL PEOPLES IN CANADA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.03219861674361356,"score_gpt":0.2795373486055785,"score_spread":0.24733873186196492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1652167591","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.102908544,0.006717756,0.0041251695,0.4930938,0.0053569116,0.00048357606,0.00086282863,0.00022180192,0.38622975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5905842,0.00392553,0.007219459,0.13029158,0.0015167223,0.00035149988,0.00034945682,0.00030020837,0.2654614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9478107,0.006624541,0.0017715092,0.0026162912,0.020353496,0.020823386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9473394,0.024178049,0.0009697017,0.0023618657,0.017636664,0.0075142803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036134314,0.0007699413,0.0017804252,0.0034838053,0.07311964,0.033073504,0.007091317,0.029529218,0.013487049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0667378,0.0020096067,0.0016464713,0.0051309066,0.02462991,0.00865417,0.009268819,0.03021791,0.00097019185],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006997101,0.000057754303,0.0020107173,0.00007854615,0.00004701759,0.00029893598,0.024019891,0.00080710556,0.0005197566,0.77516854,0.18213107,0.014790688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013958015,0.00006142994,0.0150987785,0.0004389222,0.00022725774,0.00011892173,0.039558213,0.0015095272,0.0014569449,0.08842148,0.85238415,0.00058490573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98877233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80740494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19259506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.39050278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9364753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1653276541","doi":"10.24908/fg.v8i2.4374","title":"CONSOLIDATED DEMOCRACIES AND THE PAST: TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE IN SPAIN AND CANADA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Governance","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transitional justice; Political science; Political economy; Politics; Democracy; Consolidation (business); Sociology; Development economics; Law","score_opus":0.018523410733648975,"score_gpt":0.22593136911736333,"score_spread":0.20740795838371437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1653276541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68591857,0.01211961,0.000603315,0.0643633,0.00042871747,0.00008830722,0.00037645423,0.00004856997,0.2360532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9766964,0.0025536343,0.00023004747,0.0035231484,0.00003426519,0.000013312253,0.00007797594,0.000021504862,0.01684965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99452645,0.0006096039,0.00010440492,0.00038647585,0.00094908086,0.003423931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953511,0.00072653557,0.0003581471,0.00027484825,0.0018931588,0.0013962446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003919112,0.00021538354,0.00060273515,0.0022168274,0.029924126,0.01184449,0.0022610624,0.0029102794,0.0033713148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008619374,0.00023258457,0.000401602,0.004457696,0.014508958,0.002283985,0.0047690873,0.005316808,0.00016160528],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028030016,0.00018804854,0.039207302,0.00022267518,0.000078468904,0.003392729,0.09344969,0.0024735304,0.00048303406,0.7589123,0.04024081,0.061071087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001566746,0.00007236741,0.09961277,0.0009848177,0.0001266192,0.00049298943,0.2272828,0.0025345057,0.0010972772,0.047096107,0.62020034,0.0003426886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99742305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20316663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20316663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18454076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92421377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1657864637","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2818","title":"The Responsibility of Judges in Interpreting Tax Legislation: Japan’s Experience","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Statutory interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Statutory law; Jurisprudence; Normative; Political science; Law; Supreme court; Meaning (existential); Law and economics; Economics; Linguistics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.054345914101540445,"score_gpt":0.3392434112677006,"score_spread":0.28489749716616014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1657864637","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7869145,0.012353012,0.0036259857,0.07700061,0.0016728551,0.000064186155,0.000047911326,0.00007640817,0.118244514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982945,0.0027890953,0.0006548421,0.0068522617,0.00033653135,0.00002142963,0.000022507287,0.000053436994,0.006324835],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98715115,0.007000139,0.00078019017,0.0010430465,0.0016996224,0.0023259101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896299,0.0039946353,0.00095005677,0.00070963876,0.0025090603,0.0022067383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017979667,0.00044223448,0.00082974177,0.0010538057,0.024300685,0.009095561,0.0015760792,0.0053591463,0.0026775226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019985797,0.0009655309,0.00057999825,0.0018710741,0.01923312,0.007107945,0.0096147945,0.008021276,0.00043644317],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008961779,0.000095172094,0.008749389,0.00019287659,0.000030533745,0.0040939897,0.9184651,0.00016494053,0.0014817286,0.034043156,0.016120315,0.016473254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011076212,0.00019206745,0.02013385,0.0005852212,0.000104256585,0.0018704697,0.6279458,0.0010312991,0.0010853856,0.01663508,0.33000118,0.00030466978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054222014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.102449514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054222014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007947086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009115915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10781282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W165821138","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1164","title":"Appealing Outcomes: A Study for the Overturn Rate of Canada's Appellate Courts","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02785301591765098,"score_gpt":0.30009520614751717,"score_spread":0.2722421902298662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W165821138","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97156954,0.00035087697,0.0002827675,0.0018260741,0.000016715077,0.0000539594,0.00051178364,0.000012409288,0.025375897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967303,0.00012747559,0.000086749176,0.00014726882,0.000010875498,0.000008163671,0.00016120433,0.000006446021,0.0027214352],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927297,0.00064673746,0.00022467505,0.0004894533,0.004077205,0.0018320445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96435803,0.008902698,0.009378156,0.0010179885,0.01244226,0.00390092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034333675,0.00015025488,0.0003847305,0.0037046296,0.0067840116,0.0045617293,0.0013835627,0.00094666064,0.0026875546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048480008,0.00018788967,0.0002888473,0.0054586376,0.0027122626,0.0016685146,0.0020685499,0.0029503438,0.00021636492],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001666549,0.0001750043,0.88111246,0.000054939243,0.00008545565,0.00059360417,0.04109138,0.0008193093,0.00033393805,0.029141197,0.007627857,0.03879833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008311722,0.000041457075,0.973448,0.000048296355,0.000038039852,0.00011061221,0.016856972,0.0008304402,0.00017268395,0.0013055627,0.007105567,0.000033930864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9614475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9824828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038552523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027782038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027656822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20157373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1666473040","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1179","title":"Judicial Accountability, Michel Bastarache and the Charter’s Fundamental Freedoms","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Charter; Jurisprudence; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.037496424893044666,"score_gpt":0.32508904893399215,"score_spread":0.2875926240409475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1666473040","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07057438,0.047629993,0.00740632,0.52667445,0.0012818532,0.000028889222,0.00009474435,0.000079018784,0.3462303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9670492,0.003633704,0.0011177444,0.013150919,0.0008186792,0.000018857952,0.000016441452,0.000021393938,0.0141731035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99374986,0.0030399533,0.00008791565,0.0005175518,0.0017489578,0.0008557353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941339,0.0037994385,0.0005244203,0.00031119178,0.0008181308,0.00041306263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072210464,0.0001691775,0.00038266196,0.0007849599,0.008065184,0.007962782,0.0005986802,0.0045654983,0.0016154227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012362033,0.00019916394,0.00024318462,0.0008972098,0.015816655,0.002910307,0.0021990184,0.005547283,0.0002034161],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000078002895,0.000006224107,0.00017774467,0.000014919867,0.0000021078072,0.000026732698,0.0013406487,0.00018592819,0.00008537739,0.9843641,0.00942069,0.0043678056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026969485,0.000029796125,0.0026983775,0.000208902,0.000009927358,0.00008356817,0.0010981058,0.0007976374,0.00037847308,0.67352617,0.32110015,0.00004187821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08791182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.100810744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08791182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0103096375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012329333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17480022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1683052951","doi":"10.14288/bcs.v0i82.185888","title":"Progression of Judges: A History of the Supreme Court of British Columbia by David R. Verchere","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Collections","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.030368635870000008,"score_gpt":0.2825239563727059,"score_spread":0.2521553205027059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1683052951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10672556,0.05084698,0.0015655912,0.19577125,0.0022167068,0.00015836183,0.0004994969,0.0000975119,0.64211863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71267086,0.016639205,0.0016056653,0.021936893,0.00042321946,0.00008117901,0.0001607539,0.00012118937,0.24636103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99426043,0.001394313,0.0001650943,0.0005708808,0.0017884604,0.0018208994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98970115,0.0040945183,0.00033232893,0.0003143248,0.0041324566,0.0014252746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004834659,0.00028398298,0.000491964,0.0038106146,0.03613438,0.015438744,0.0020738868,0.0052891104,0.008427736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017961567,0.0006582227,0.00021706932,0.006281857,0.017499382,0.0037761559,0.00432485,0.009296657,0.0008274414],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008448731,0.00008213294,0.0051257,0.0001442358,0.000026045038,0.00084140874,0.059064087,0.00073526416,0.00037307243,0.5763321,0.25007483,0.10711674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002481787,0.00002257061,0.017309248,0.00087768555,0.000027981936,0.00009488473,0.027818693,0.0003537486,0.00037594014,0.04123056,0.9117114,0.00015258361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96193355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9908414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.082370505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.082370505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10337907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59764266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W168547891","doi":"","title":"Conclusion — The Migration of Legal Ideas: Legislative Design and the Lawmaking Process","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Formality; Lawmaking; Legislature; Legal pluralism; Political science; Comparative law; Bureaucracy; Pluralism (philosophy); Law; Preference; Legal realism; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.011599824166220626,"score_gpt":0.28156829855442084,"score_spread":0.2699684743882002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W168547891","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032545924,0.0112110935,0.04709406,0.57621366,0.0092937285,0.00024214435,0.0005546486,0.00028637963,0.3225584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69320685,0.0076674335,0.023091735,0.13175006,0.0067136465,0.000386678,0.00051022467,0.0003487526,0.13632461],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974548,0.0013928976,0.000084380765,0.0003878089,0.00048648857,0.00019356365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938717,0.003525789,0.00039693562,0.0004338184,0.0013038362,0.0004678856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034546447,0.00027315257,0.00022417151,0.0008756967,0.0021423153,0.0072829416,0.0014131482,0.002520091,0.015555532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010485598,0.00015638238,0.0005491784,0.001056176,0.0078623695,0.008280971,0.0029963823,0.004251033,0.002447969],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067291374,0.000042681724,0.001842749,0.00023056826,0.000016551623,0.00010559336,0.0121184215,0.00022889771,0.00030398867,0.8681154,0.09688085,0.020047083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025452691,0.00003745077,0.0043087364,0.00064286956,0.000028655137,0.00020679094,0.026664112,0.00070147944,0.0010862405,0.32294956,0.64332074,0.000027854067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042912895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004786796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015555532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029667786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026016023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05203843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1687411712","doi":"10.12957/publicum.2016.27018","title":"How Unwritten Constitutional Norms Change Written Constitutions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Political science; Law; Constitutional amendment; Original meaning; Constitutional economics; Constitutional law; Legislature; Constitutional interpretation; Norm (philosophy); Originalism; Constitution; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.06252922353307204,"score_gpt":0.2800950830805794,"score_spread":0.21756585954750735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1687411712","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32883114,0.0010998594,0.037477314,0.019248031,0.00047025285,0.00016916014,0.00018489505,0.00018835774,0.61233103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839633,0.00021223849,0.003159232,0.0008957019,0.000062309155,0.00004929944,0.00005139572,0.00007208089,0.011534449],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98460823,0.0072646644,0.00053622626,0.0019348683,0.0040857582,0.0015701869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98371387,0.00807367,0.001550362,0.003760669,0.002398062,0.0005034539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008911047,0.0001717547,0.0003008661,0.0011809535,0.004786046,0.01096286,0.0011676969,0.0015465255,0.0053629423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03702193,0.0002338244,0.00026284007,0.0010801851,0.030348081,0.005980316,0.0031914092,0.0037026186,0.00043090628],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015411268,0.000020260803,0.0013615998,0.0000339291,0.000010630921,0.00013267208,0.02012735,0.00080942496,0.00089771446,0.9600443,0.0014002966,0.015146339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006411657,0.00006505549,0.010599897,0.0003493587,0.00005630991,0.00016283576,0.025697703,0.0023783706,0.003782571,0.75864893,0.19810446,0.00009043282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02558245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034528192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02558245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008518935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064454055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06180948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1710424065","doi":"10.1080/08263663.2014.883827","title":"Le contrôle législatif de la bureaucratie sous les régimes présidentiels: Le cas de l’Argentine à la lumière des théories américaines","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies / Revue canadienne des études latino-américaines et caraïbes","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.028444351488665424,"score_gpt":0.2754304417094041,"score_spread":0.2469860902207387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1710424065","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7331974,0.004871617,0.00144844,0.009781489,0.000068434114,0.0000260239,0.00008050477,0.000015942704,0.25051022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98728454,0.00087857083,0.00018734131,0.00023612543,0.000055989905,0.000020550444,0.000021502367,0.000009339414,0.011306092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809307,0.00078430877,0.000037480993,0.00023184765,0.00028784233,0.00056547107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99723756,0.0011579923,0.00063287636,0.00016951417,0.0005255315,0.00027637416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002324101,0.00016661957,0.00024259754,0.0007772908,0.0034324313,0.005483311,0.00052122003,0.00088639715,0.006331474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035575342,0.00016544203,0.00015561571,0.0011251887,0.0043868725,0.0013884943,0.0011159239,0.0012209598,0.0002591738],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021744095,0.00010142713,0.04676792,0.00026914183,0.00003845285,0.0005315729,0.062233042,0.0012570056,0.0021267938,0.8311166,0.00654418,0.04879633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000105197454,0.0002225442,0.48260987,0.0007619716,0.00009155014,0.00025212538,0.04528134,0.0031909316,0.0014622083,0.041207805,0.4247385,0.00007589838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09630388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11144274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09630388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007578554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037178653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19148666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1712134171","doi":"","title":"Lesbians, Gay Men and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Subjectivity; Charter; Heteronormativity; Heterosexuality; Gender studies; Political science; Doctrine; Homosexuality; Law; Political subjectivity; Politics; Sociology; Gay rights; Human sexuality; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0329889584142464,"score_gpt":0.3009609721328364,"score_spread":0.26797201371859003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1712134171","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.155563,0.048953645,0.0025098522,0.13249302,0.0011886401,0.000051341456,0.000064062784,0.000039560677,0.65913695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95157635,0.005647093,0.0007022243,0.0055958927,0.0004766203,0.000037568418,0.000015322255,0.000013252558,0.03593561],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99573094,0.002874003,0.000092167356,0.00020641132,0.00061017374,0.00048641072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99800974,0.000863716,0.00027773212,0.00013788433,0.00027796745,0.00043309492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053474745,0.00024080329,0.00032727618,0.0014090295,0.010279934,0.010695347,0.00046758156,0.0022278256,0.0031068972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048203706,0.00016631323,0.000113832844,0.00083550776,0.04063425,0.003502107,0.0028904234,0.004566038,0.0002358658],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004159223,0.000012393627,0.0003091385,0.000010066083,9.058533e-7,0.00004156394,0.013800285,0.000022365382,0.000041102197,0.98066413,0.0026929812,0.0024008416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034105924,0.000048409474,0.0028349014,0.00042926535,0.000007891874,0.00016117835,0.057469152,0.00013743795,0.00025286787,0.4481103,0.4904846,0.000030011091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029836513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045174386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97016346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004873676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00830346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059325695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1722913305","doi":"10.29173/alr281","title":"The Difficulty of Constitutional Amendment in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Constitutionalism; Constitutional amendment; Statute; Law; Political science; Politics; Constitutional law; Limited government; Amendment; Originalism; Supreme court; Democracy","score_opus":0.04481480875661499,"score_gpt":0.29956805553630916,"score_spread":0.2547532467796942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1722913305","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11458783,0.013164759,0.0033868405,0.06322339,0.0003802496,0.00010465665,0.00057011587,0.000099655335,0.80448246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.958575,0.004611802,0.0017270679,0.004744647,0.00009420598,0.000038600345,0.00017321961,0.000043860644,0.029991554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9856376,0.002609635,0.00049811124,0.0015288456,0.005195733,0.004530146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9848032,0.0063912533,0.0008673671,0.0010170068,0.005568445,0.0013527884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007811457,0.00021410875,0.00066792563,0.003449761,0.022030821,0.0126357535,0.0019588096,0.0025630142,0.0069997073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035326347,0.00045510003,0.00042022616,0.0058363522,0.016786732,0.0028882804,0.0037865508,0.0044952887,0.00034958587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002933494,0.000008970435,0.0025081993,0.00007383754,0.000022689846,0.00022290181,0.0053087035,0.00082513684,0.0001790001,0.9569516,0.013250158,0.020619506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007904227,0.00004008564,0.03405596,0.0007880917,0.00018005773,0.0002800112,0.01475209,0.0037305178,0.0010018783,0.29114154,0.6537294,0.00022135906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.983011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99034613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.856828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.143172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17249505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99379903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1734584319","doi":"10.24124/c677/2013381","title":"Meaningful Participation? The Judicialization of Electoral Reform in Canada Post-Figueroa v. Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Political Science Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Legislature; Electoral reform; Supreme court; Citizen journalism; Public administration; Political science; Democratic system; State (computer science); Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.02309300363091316,"score_gpt":0.2956653401613637,"score_spread":0.27257233653045054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1734584319","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5298191,0.006152183,0.001976595,0.13978632,0.0006361194,0.00047674568,0.00052988826,0.00006610678,0.32055697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97445506,0.00096877204,0.00038926504,0.008190511,0.00007572246,0.00006026594,0.00006441859,0.000016478085,0.015779503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.983052,0.0031606434,0.00035417857,0.0011350457,0.004654413,0.0076437485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98331904,0.0065189106,0.0010959645,0.0006224856,0.006197073,0.0022465128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012241892,0.0002372875,0.0007389516,0.0020533253,0.037475158,0.014046263,0.0037099186,0.0058970894,0.002790571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031077228,0.0005375827,0.0004937278,0.0033843573,0.01667373,0.0022804227,0.0037069693,0.008788728,0.00016558266],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008963343,0.00009628991,0.011360201,0.00015363564,0.000052667,0.00084165006,0.060604874,0.0008887379,0.001157944,0.86556417,0.033927586,0.025262706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024003016,0.00015836998,0.12625453,0.0008111965,0.00026484672,0.0002942193,0.12094893,0.0027498591,0.0039744787,0.057879347,0.6860231,0.00040112474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98834884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99496967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17285395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17285395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32311872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95937216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1735496562","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1030","title":"Does Canada Need a Political Questions Doctrine?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Doctrine; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.034377514726984915,"score_gpt":0.29878037540790536,"score_spread":0.26440286068092045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1735496562","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011117175,0.003569242,0.0016527476,0.5751403,0.0011488103,0.00005731925,0.0009911294,0.000064569664,0.40625858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4836334,0.005961604,0.0033265445,0.26310217,0.0012044499,0.00011097389,0.00055327365,0.00018373174,0.2419238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99306846,0.0006417362,0.000120724435,0.0006555139,0.0025860255,0.0029274905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99224186,0.002409536,0.000259872,0.00030432313,0.0036812392,0.0011032018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003832877,0.00036544277,0.0007007285,0.0017515086,0.01998651,0.013779376,0.003045862,0.01317451,0.029993415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01693732,0.0003907543,0.000644156,0.0034909756,0.011056581,0.006655202,0.0024296134,0.0091444645,0.0019995046],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001722246,0.0000111844365,0.0012163115,0.000042349497,0.000009799268,0.00012061683,0.00086380244,0.00013966083,0.000071719136,0.91085726,0.08030446,0.006345641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058724654,0.000017505472,0.0052402904,0.0003188555,0.000055326036,0.000105941755,0.005199014,0.0008956594,0.0005203647,0.21230592,0.7751583,0.00012407824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98010767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9880177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07728669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07728669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19139792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5607568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1737373107","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1297","title":"Canada (Attorney General) v. Bedford and the Limits on Substantive Criminal Law under Section 7","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Arbitrariness; Supreme court; Charter; Proportionality (law); Parliament; Political science; Legislature; Criminal law; Section (typography); Constitutional law; Criminal justice; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.046386013255595424,"score_gpt":0.2924796537766195,"score_spread":0.24609364052102406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1737373107","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.085630864,0.017966917,0.0042015715,0.07196111,0.00078030286,0.00015096106,0.0007056497,0.00010030487,0.81850225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.823322,0.007986228,0.0041111615,0.057445813,0.00031753283,0.00017799853,0.00033246164,0.00004712432,0.10625976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.988937,0.0013453305,0.00028136343,0.00074266526,0.0050226166,0.0036709032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940169,0.0028355801,0.0003265923,0.00022094422,0.0021702014,0.00042969928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044074785,0.00027647297,0.00038883358,0.001744272,0.0143187195,0.0051852884,0.0018282935,0.0061084456,0.004551637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008721879,0.0006257134,0.00062610285,0.0016439165,0.01079739,0.0018801874,0.0014647788,0.005177261,0.0003726679],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000082853985,0.00000763286,0.00082908093,0.000037251648,0.000005852629,0.00010803008,0.0011371312,0.00014868336,0.00014275005,0.97806054,0.015053778,0.00446102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000958999,0.0000731306,0.035834588,0.00088275963,0.00011635127,0.00031936757,0.0042582424,0.0012010998,0.0015921901,0.24051152,0.7148698,0.0002450682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9622839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9825419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04673097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04673097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09899085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33905846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1750103857","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9930.2010.00325.x","title":"A Refugee from Justice? Disparate Treatment in the Federal Court of Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Immigration; Refugee; Demographics; Political science; Economic Justice; Law; Representation (politics); Ideology; Criminology; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.0206372752287287,"score_gpt":0.31414653894605016,"score_spread":0.29350926371732144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1750103857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47639322,0.008421948,0.0015867411,0.23571149,0.001099221,0.00013398315,0.00045218968,0.00005224018,0.276149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9650907,0.0014745783,0.00034692683,0.023068044,0.00013947464,0.000024516212,0.000053298783,0.000012666768,0.009789814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907222,0.0011834168,0.00016995086,0.00063049566,0.0022948214,0.004999115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99318886,0.0017277361,0.0005407459,0.00025590023,0.002002948,0.002283883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004547603,0.00021285184,0.0005516549,0.0021416142,0.04787266,0.010518872,0.0023594026,0.0057224687,0.005593873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015437685,0.00040549625,0.00045909602,0.0035813062,0.012238018,0.002341139,0.0047272383,0.008809452,0.0002681324],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009485164,0.00011482118,0.034786325,0.000081637176,0.00006555441,0.0025318146,0.039967094,0.00080787716,0.00066096894,0.8042781,0.080845214,0.035765797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018840238,0.000121115045,0.13601625,0.0012972483,0.00028594138,0.0012663373,0.17284772,0.0028542932,0.0013793617,0.13510726,0.5481046,0.0005314868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98894566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12288158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12288158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20051162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8915724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W17541795","doi":"10.1007/s10633-007-9061-1","title":"Patriation, Politics and Power: The State of Balance between the Supreme Court and Parliament after 30 Years of the Charter","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Charter; Constitution; Supreme court; Parliament; Judicial review; Politics; Separation of powers; Legislature; Legislation","score_opus":0.00669886340461423,"score_gpt":0.23615717096638736,"score_spread":0.22945830756177313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W17541795","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96360385,0.0032428186,0.0006214457,0.002968752,0.00009235425,0.000007394243,0.00003968271,0.000007251038,0.029416533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968231,0.00047334455,0.0001032347,0.00018875647,0.00005508755,0.0000023562,0.000009509406,0.0000048468696,0.0023398246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989623,0.00042307048,0.000043128624,0.00013277939,0.0002756621,0.00016302655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980861,0.0006005341,0.00064480276,0.00015642833,0.00026596338,0.000246259],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026545348,0.00008521297,0.00020336492,0.00060041994,0.0014923427,0.0019231957,0.00020448156,0.000655373,0.0016861302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068086246,0.00009547179,0.00014143293,0.0006636847,0.0041791173,0.0011919541,0.001061071,0.0010003523,0.00019982895],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00085731584,0.00029765727,0.13619474,0.0002181536,0.00011606991,0.001931435,0.12210355,0.0008594045,0.019581966,0.41181517,0.010559189,0.29546538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003523565,0.000973652,0.58047926,0.00032106836,0.00008039395,0.0012690092,0.03377637,0.0015807111,0.008067999,0.059141297,0.31415734,0.00011767563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002894435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005716917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9988102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011898278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084186863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014038682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1755290261","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1257","title":"“Dollars Versus [Equality] Rights”: Money and the Limits on Distributive Justice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Distributive justice; Political science; Plaintiff; Law and economics; Supreme court; Adjudication; Government (linguistics); Social rights; Economics; Economic Justice; Law; Public economics; Politics","score_opus":0.08993198609582952,"score_gpt":0.3613987024357866,"score_spread":0.27146671633995706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1755290261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07737834,0.0071411314,0.019627998,0.10150706,0.0004040646,0.00006607535,0.00018561445,0.000053099004,0.7936366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95237505,0.0013622568,0.0030841397,0.011686382,0.0003893694,0.000080322454,0.000043517903,0.00004948004,0.030929422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98567396,0.0038697675,0.0002787943,0.0012518488,0.0055508115,0.003374758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946733,0.0028129106,0.00043935401,0.00052745716,0.0010198466,0.0005272042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006888356,0.00046415222,0.0006938289,0.00153211,0.009849108,0.016509514,0.0024378805,0.006510922,0.009073661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015916217,0.00035121286,0.00061434164,0.0016254925,0.04738935,0.0117789805,0.0063383477,0.0074028918,0.0005478575],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053157964,0.0000025854404,0.00011413402,0.0000050095173,0.0000014821641,0.000020685566,0.00046959883,0.000053449883,0.00002913565,0.9965473,0.001183802,0.0015675382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002278981,0.000016599986,0.0016569477,0.00017089148,0.000014375328,0.00005996647,0.001965729,0.0005983948,0.0003696394,0.9269297,0.06815958,0.000035375124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.213073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2792773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.213073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025326231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022367481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42366558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1759993853","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1050","title":"What’s Law Good For?: An Empirical Overview of Charter Equality Rights Decisions","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Fundamental rights; Promotion (chess); Human rights","score_opus":0.22900690932000367,"score_gpt":0.4431924705097113,"score_spread":0.2141855611897076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1759993853","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6945328,0.2037456,0.0017740343,0.022025784,0.00016274587,0.00013948737,0.0014134619,0.000020873389,0.076185204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9165739,0.076047756,0.00074174354,0.0033853014,0.00016221585,0.00004831073,0.0006735594,0.000026841673,0.0023403086],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99056214,0.0036362023,0.0010171921,0.0007454161,0.003095112,0.0009439509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90664464,0.06871496,0.014348374,0.0012193006,0.008027179,0.0010456758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010542945,0.00015479789,0.0005301898,0.008794758,0.0026236286,0.0059814667,0.0008137356,0.0015065172,0.0025475416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04818016,0.00037662388,0.00041373257,0.017221466,0.0042655077,0.007400902,0.001834879,0.0023104632,0.00033599258],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018112434,0.0003164437,0.40970844,0.0031701096,0.0002724556,0.001301398,0.10421607,0.00079008006,0.0008612412,0.07544036,0.03443219,0.36931014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017904784,0.00019777787,0.65832585,0.004416571,0.0001963423,0.0011795941,0.112139024,0.00052847964,0.0006260586,0.007254181,0.21502902,0.00008916529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04964896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10259546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04964896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052773575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067885723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098719954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1764645577","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2660","title":"Taking purposes seriously: The purposive scope and textual bounds of interpretation under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Interpretation (philosophy); Jurisprudence; Law; Supreme court; Constitution; Political science; Legitimacy; Context (archaeology); Originalism; Meaning (existential); Judicial interpretation; Scope (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01907488820453316,"score_gpt":0.240325353376364,"score_spread":0.22125046517183083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1764645577","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.083231285,0.0056410604,0.02655139,0.06471032,0.0003714464,0.000113063594,0.00014746808,0.00010337245,0.81913054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809496,0.0010734184,0.0044214283,0.0022996003,0.00010634486,0.00008256995,0.00003753976,0.000063792526,0.010965759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.965694,0.01678727,0.0009826929,0.0019632361,0.01026633,0.0043064663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9671943,0.02183708,0.0014686369,0.002575511,0.005584765,0.0013396434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020757487,0.00071504945,0.00084991514,0.004192556,0.031015716,0.029033639,0.002773564,0.0045486456,0.0026726578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037583392,0.0008737056,0.00066557195,0.004604149,0.15047856,0.011335723,0.01127272,0.008916001,0.0003263552],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007393717,0.0000038758913,0.000255981,0.000019410956,0.0000025710324,0.000051050327,0.04774043,0.00010100381,0.00008584698,0.9463508,0.0010753789,0.004306123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040705352,0.000018380755,0.0032499626,0.0005910933,0.00004203835,0.00011477459,0.071392514,0.00090244244,0.00064177136,0.78239715,0.14050786,0.00010131441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7880925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79718417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2119075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07329427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10597033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53178966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1766867618","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1280","title":"Doré, Proportionality and the Virtues of Judicial Craft","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Craft; Categorization; Supreme court; Law; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Law and economics; History; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02968401836408885,"score_gpt":0.30799844209765986,"score_spread":0.278314423733571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1766867618","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055908058,0.032233797,0.019053165,0.2716995,0.001665475,0.00008803776,0.00014040222,0.000080636506,0.61913085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96191967,0.0035984195,0.0023547057,0.013597562,0.00058186194,0.00003485157,0.000015821504,0.00003242383,0.017864643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9813923,0.0055562677,0.0005860878,0.001819107,0.006770734,0.0038754502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977207,0.014554078,0.0014045907,0.0017080449,0.004258711,0.00086760375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019450918,0.0003435675,0.00082298135,0.0025885208,0.012201929,0.013298043,0.0022126841,0.0068974234,0.0034529674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05041944,0.0004466584,0.00058255676,0.0019327437,0.056277234,0.0068261563,0.0038211513,0.008629717,0.00032225333],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032740836,0.0000020468499,0.00013011995,0.000011414223,0.000002741363,0.000026784559,0.00049842824,0.0000702479,0.0000142515555,0.9951787,0.0022272528,0.001834704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032752192,0.000010326043,0.0014310352,0.00019746675,0.000019069344,0.00009193677,0.0014026366,0.0005077742,0.00028201606,0.9083277,0.087665424,0.000031965003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3509857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40478355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3509857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027241655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043232873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6978855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1767597263","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0491.2010.01489.x","title":"Improving Russian Justice with Foreign Assistance: Model Courts and the Tactical Approach","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Governance","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Curriculum; Political science; Judicial reform; Law; Sociology; Public relations; Public administration","score_opus":0.01259842670787279,"score_gpt":0.24598415576485905,"score_spread":0.23338572905698626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1767597263","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64034206,0.0012489271,0.050036274,0.014936565,0.00012900558,0.00017406896,0.00003549694,0.0001278783,0.29296973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921198,0.0002858175,0.004289392,0.00020378844,0.000011660335,0.000028608298,0.000008110145,0.000008217821,0.0030446625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917916,0.006333376,0.00012648459,0.00032901225,0.00078449,0.00063504494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99705935,0.0012087916,0.0004747924,0.0005548112,0.0003936862,0.0003086026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005061314,0.00021844567,0.00018737763,0.0009066733,0.004173428,0.0072157052,0.00093746546,0.0012873214,0.0029728073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008368958,0.0001405597,0.00022659355,0.0008900414,0.0058887955,0.0042984327,0.005910293,0.0017600113,0.0002349794],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004630245,0.00033458433,0.011304063,0.00016118892,0.00003813126,0.000696955,0.055652652,0.008925155,0.0016218326,0.81049734,0.0029779314,0.10774387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013716765,0.0012223207,0.03624364,0.0010106313,0.00013047564,0.001624856,0.17690408,0.028418243,0.0053899228,0.42197686,0.32680714,0.00013462022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00856082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022287937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00856082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059535718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008803849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04319632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1770814582","doi":"","title":"Writing the Unwritten: The Officialization of Constitutional Convention in Canada, the United Kingdom, New Zealand and Australia","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Convention; Law; Constitution; Political science; Kingdom; Politics; Government (linguistics); Public administration; History","score_opus":0.0545307910497036,"score_gpt":0.2849552033945558,"score_spread":0.23042441234485223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1770814582","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2783035,0.01410278,0.006263603,0.09203382,0.0014167195,0.00039363693,0.00031804977,0.00023573998,0.6069321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9001221,0.0042629354,0.00511732,0.00612839,0.000111252244,0.00010966665,0.00012666231,0.00020034553,0.08382132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97051877,0.006344856,0.001214885,0.0016292577,0.014987927,0.0053042667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96741486,0.011523238,0.001716423,0.0017799615,0.014837753,0.0027277507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0238245,0.00035595914,0.0005698326,0.0028793034,0.029066859,0.01194368,0.0022988052,0.0028462424,0.0022364086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051584944,0.00067112816,0.00020979987,0.005111968,0.026074536,0.0039140466,0.004487057,0.008920194,0.00027545897],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002260251,0.000029451974,0.0030772588,0.0001168736,0.000007671094,0.00038029635,0.2153151,0.00028982092,0.00060769357,0.6882431,0.03733338,0.054576844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002142626,0.00003406209,0.027728269,0.00038215914,0.00001779497,0.00019380113,0.072881185,0.00087762374,0.0009781623,0.016883327,0.8798241,0.00017815357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97937757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9858342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8987869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1012131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23920137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73435587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1773230185","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1265","title":"The Upside of Dissent in Equality Jurisprudence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Dissenting opinion; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Charter; Supreme court; Variety (cybernetics); Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.05014359831196368,"score_gpt":0.35891352240995905,"score_spread":0.30876992409799536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1773230185","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08450039,0.041051265,0.07119574,0.27422392,0.0027876254,0.00010899329,0.000055615474,0.00006461421,0.52601177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95540446,0.004228676,0.009987436,0.018567717,0.0019679486,0.00015558345,0.000012998286,0.000048347214,0.009626823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9651701,0.024481822,0.0010001548,0.0026188153,0.0051751966,0.0015539114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9690071,0.026382733,0.0009841638,0.0016085649,0.0013182596,0.00069918396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036324903,0.0004579225,0.00088730047,0.0024609412,0.010992757,0.008366077,0.0015212803,0.0052928748,0.0027577798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038060397,0.00043771332,0.00067197107,0.0015298934,0.07685921,0.012138716,0.008906942,0.009809026,0.00044356694],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061949727,0.0000050513986,0.00009739542,0.000017563465,0.0000026143402,0.000030838983,0.0016986256,0.000059823025,0.000026967024,0.99453825,0.00075820246,0.002758379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009724641,0.00001199345,0.00014395839,0.000055025634,0.0000027993344,0.000026698868,0.0005272533,0.00012718335,0.000088469125,0.99056554,0.0084348945,0.000006511901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024869568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029695795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036324903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040673283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036106466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19210672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1774047662","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1263","title":"Democracy and Dissent: Reconsidering the Judicial Review of the Political Sphere","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Dissent; Democracy; Supreme court; Law; Politics; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.05805980761421975,"score_gpt":0.30903144942230304,"score_spread":0.2509716418080833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1774047662","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06606974,0.070017144,0.04354899,0.5191725,0.010806282,0.000352221,0.00014917689,0.0001569325,0.28972703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9072095,0.008365905,0.010525202,0.048258338,0.009027642,0.0002265895,0.000053623808,0.00012612218,0.016207187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8999624,0.06026799,0.0057050055,0.00759996,0.019846201,0.006618386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.78656965,0.16677144,0.007334229,0.011261063,0.024602849,0.0034608615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10792653,0.00042040943,0.0018587578,0.0053749206,0.011126026,0.018920923,0.004758313,0.014071133,0.0021004686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19919144,0.0006407556,0.0010317292,0.0034327002,0.037874166,0.014574892,0.0064437324,0.01495415,0.00043867386],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002891714,0.000018816025,0.00053797266,0.000097844844,0.000023179824,0.00022921519,0.006491192,0.00035633202,0.00018158891,0.9554985,0.016315274,0.020221315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008479153,0.00004876576,0.0013003575,0.0005561831,0.000041794465,0.00015894351,0.004077414,0.0015604335,0.0006246918,0.8411341,0.15031461,0.00009801026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015871974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023368137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10792653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013402934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025072988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5707769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1776435105","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1282","title":"Judging in Secular Times: Max Weber and the Rise of Proportionality","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Jurisprudence; Bureaucracy; Law; Metaphysics; Sociology; Churning; The Imaginary; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Economics; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.024508056357670546,"score_gpt":0.2971709197602406,"score_spread":0.27266286340257007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1776435105","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047907405,0.04662897,0.013972921,0.16732846,0.0018853263,0.000034066954,0.000052652038,0.000056536705,0.72213364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9631185,0.0062961397,0.0030325912,0.0053005493,0.0013083282,0.000025884774,0.0000128708425,0.000038536837,0.020866692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959149,0.0024368868,0.0001113209,0.0004423418,0.0008031089,0.00029142262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99370295,0.004701603,0.00032552567,0.00032292004,0.0006173696,0.00032957527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007847007,0.00031165048,0.00034075096,0.0021210357,0.006302232,0.0072716773,0.00059857866,0.0021242585,0.0024401753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013241862,0.00025436538,0.00018691599,0.0017244903,0.034970246,0.009232964,0.0020051484,0.0034785115,0.00026019017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027599021,0.0000019661443,0.000055910255,0.0000053522413,6.775349e-7,0.0000137973275,0.0016305523,0.000045800472,0.000010983333,0.9937091,0.0019388841,0.0025842644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051463844,0.0000044970343,0.00017732673,0.00004951035,0.0000015953234,0.000017961207,0.000937384,0.00019820637,0.000055198612,0.94202864,0.056516837,0.000007671082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015569382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017816937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015569382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076929163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035403515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055816293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1780258276","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1095","title":"Right Theory, Wrong Reasons: Dynamic Interpretation, the Charter and “Fundamental Laws”","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Jurisprudence; Law; Charter; Meaning (existential); Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Adjudication; CLARITY; Surprise; Doctrine; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.010850614914889463,"score_gpt":0.28560949164065763,"score_spread":0.27475887672576815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1780258276","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024073735,0.00891023,0.12584187,0.15210901,0.0013723669,0.00008337356,0.00026769482,0.0001546019,0.6871872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94333696,0.0017040881,0.014557771,0.013422143,0.0012267457,0.00020783822,0.00012354541,0.0001516561,0.025269205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879758,0.007637706,0.00033061195,0.0014000424,0.001707628,0.0009482042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906624,0.006044485,0.00064393604,0.0013279985,0.0010157658,0.00030547706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012513152,0.0007351814,0.00068758207,0.0023308897,0.0058841724,0.01142123,0.0024452738,0.008274004,0.005565297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015628824,0.00055920036,0.00085990824,0.0017802014,0.08042152,0.018326193,0.0042909756,0.009197708,0.00078937423],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015017266,0.0000012393256,0.000019501487,0.0000034128147,5.779703e-7,0.000010104703,0.00054421177,0.000030249405,0.00000477566,0.998035,0.0009248522,0.00042464034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060213965,0.0000017328825,0.000038421582,0.000021799435,0.0000016367159,0.000019814814,0.00041891597,0.00016290201,0.000032957596,0.9856068,0.013684772,0.0000041183694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009383743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075384313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012513152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008848915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006640783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06617665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1781206667","doi":"10.7202/1000568ar","title":"Réponse à James Tully. Le défi canadien : faire droit à deux visions différentes du pays","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Globe Revue internationale d’études québécoises","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Vision; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030242586794605803,"score_gpt":0.24410184528338696,"score_spread":0.21385925848878115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1781206667","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022521142,0.04675342,0.00090539386,0.8782198,0.008347913,0.000010453068,0.00012499814,0.000035031946,0.06335081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16446541,0.035565954,0.0020465597,0.54224485,0.010852376,0.00008614809,0.00015386936,0.00027318785,0.2443117],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996316,0.0012461212,0.00008978433,0.0006747566,0.0010244255,0.00064894976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953107,0.0018782156,0.00020620973,0.00017978798,0.0015958826,0.00082921784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037909655,0.00072130427,0.00072701566,0.00164624,0.013221876,0.0119556105,0.0017519337,0.00823361,0.011099374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007600699,0.0003351641,0.0005065577,0.001998015,0.015340032,0.008466736,0.004081067,0.016855428,0.0018718917],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002691191,0.000021289134,0.0005529636,0.000090761365,0.000009686809,0.00016669041,0.01073915,0.00010218892,0.00008990558,0.40528053,0.57142353,0.0114963865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065318436,0.000007745757,0.0007832578,0.0003598424,0.000007700313,0.00008834193,0.0058552693,0.00010635176,0.00008726992,0.038822204,0.9538342,0.0000412865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55301785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6451208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44698215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027391743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022653893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89922905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1781936603","doi":"10.21991/c9ft1n","title":"A Level Playing Field for Classical Liberalism: the Abolition of the Court Challenges Program Empowers a Diversity of Perspectives on Freedom and Equality","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Democracy; Supreme court; Parliament; Law; Sovereignty; Liberalism; Politics; Diversity (politics); Public administration","score_opus":0.12312341857132394,"score_gpt":0.31864253031266854,"score_spread":0.1955191117413446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1781936603","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023115443,0.006117632,0.038971268,0.23468263,0.0017550157,0.00006670064,0.00012579301,0.000106652704,0.69505894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8902989,0.002683394,0.008143914,0.04139291,0.0015120169,0.00015724864,0.00006378206,0.00015160545,0.05559614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992172,0.0029467589,0.00014317676,0.0010516987,0.0027921111,0.00089411146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99491334,0.0027062022,0.0002574301,0.00076338055,0.00072533736,0.0006342009],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009075453,0.00041073753,0.00056264317,0.0016833025,0.013184545,0.013880498,0.0014495807,0.0040232004,0.0052320496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009971757,0.00026422096,0.00038297256,0.0018694041,0.0831073,0.009140309,0.006637053,0.01163148,0.00061042065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003794511,0.0000028643346,0.000033109147,0.000005351766,8.462105e-7,0.000005324815,0.000746968,0.000022755692,0.000022883698,0.99556255,0.001922742,0.0016708393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018259621,0.000011312534,0.00021270303,0.000069315516,0.0000030897534,0.000019543622,0.0011250124,0.00022202024,0.00013266249,0.9012387,0.09693215,0.000015272672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050144184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07668054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050144184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018809147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01780821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13647056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1782429675","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2465089","title":"The Bungling of Justice Nadon's Appointment to the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Economic Justice; Political science","score_opus":0.009138267133878369,"score_gpt":0.24546404006465622,"score_spread":0.23632577293077786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1782429675","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038166925,0.0051639774,0.00091164396,0.75562274,0.0106711695,0.00007768847,0.00042669784,0.00007550132,0.18888365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41279772,0.0019762306,0.0006878478,0.2491798,0.0015550158,0.00004710059,0.000091124464,0.00014248413,0.3335226],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.989488,0.00092175405,0.00017057794,0.0013132939,0.0030501096,0.005056353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99159265,0.00175462,0.0001978516,0.0002150926,0.0035920278,0.0026476418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047062566,0.0004069339,0.00090502476,0.0012668642,0.051299565,0.013288478,0.0024929945,0.02211971,0.009960963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021251462,0.0007749149,0.00073312345,0.0015315214,0.009832688,0.0030832742,0.0029091712,0.026347205,0.00093169237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010154109,0.00003492656,0.0029499896,0.00005019645,0.00004722216,0.00087341643,0.010064901,0.00037631165,0.00044411936,0.32157943,0.6505439,0.0129340375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033252083,0.000022647208,0.006129234,0.00017211917,0.000047773843,0.00010910396,0.011252495,0.00046333135,0.0006097919,0.020936882,0.96008486,0.00013859528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98335844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99572563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8879255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.112074494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19918236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8131612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1782738748","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2434504","title":"Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, Reasoning Introduction","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Rule of law; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.008682228525406418,"score_gpt":0.2605788716434362,"score_spread":0.2518966431180298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1782738748","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020755623,0.11579753,0.1772889,0.15005967,0.0041968366,0.00019152342,0.00093325845,0.00026729328,0.5305094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8330133,0.039116234,0.053898543,0.011423758,0.01762506,0.0005402774,0.00051359937,0.00016620738,0.04370301],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99317944,0.0040495326,0.00032609378,0.0010921488,0.0011004355,0.0002523689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.969841,0.027409008,0.0005669889,0.00087958353,0.0010838312,0.00021947561],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00832749,0.0007233508,0.0014911899,0.0027946453,0.0030520845,0.009240299,0.0024651496,0.007882019,0.018169066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025184618,0.0009389834,0.0011074187,0.0052052876,0.031286314,0.016953763,0.0026163491,0.008941166,0.0016744097],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003280767,0.0000048954475,0.000038035196,0.000041349977,0.0000014576041,0.000010065731,0.00012249012,0.000115997085,0.000014114475,0.99519414,0.001788669,0.002665428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039651386,0.0000028648699,0.000052060786,0.00003798224,0.0000015382265,0.000024480578,0.0000372275,0.00021898121,0.000014339111,0.9926795,0.006922713,0.0000044851968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052446076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018011642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018169066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044630887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002740783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060781598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1789597661","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1300","title":"Charter Right or Charter-Lite?: Administrative Discretion and the Charter","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Discretion; Law; Adjudication; Proportionality (law); Supreme court; Constitutional law; Judicial review; Deference; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04309848991795947,"score_gpt":0.3308592416274241,"score_spread":0.28776075170946463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1789597661","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037960038,0.058530994,0.015075542,0.44185647,0.0020077922,0.00008310405,0.00024062829,0.00011323911,0.44413224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8844941,0.0070374636,0.0041163675,0.045936313,0.00092930364,0.000050539988,0.0000458262,0.000058418507,0.057331473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895633,0.0035508678,0.00027237769,0.0010311283,0.0032588136,0.0023236058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909847,0.005525534,0.00078254536,0.00056444004,0.0015418987,0.0006008828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009879603,0.0002386839,0.0005639311,0.0012607109,0.007970884,0.015883815,0.0016288544,0.0054492205,0.0025109379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020164441,0.00032880018,0.00037793303,0.001414422,0.028397208,0.006148669,0.0020306285,0.007232716,0.00032684405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008105028,0.0000051505135,0.00020429713,0.000018510356,0.0000023265363,0.000035949335,0.00094374956,0.00008806946,0.000060514874,0.9844856,0.009388559,0.0047591534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050248793,0.00003590099,0.0034113666,0.00043139962,0.00002929427,0.000117926735,0.0026052033,0.0010353492,0.0009727551,0.5156036,0.47560847,0.00009841859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49035794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63633794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49035794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026606478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041780103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9750075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1791025234","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1317","title":"Pluralism, Disagreement, and Globalization: A Comment on Webber's \"Legal Pluralism and Human Agency\"","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Globalization; Legal pluralism; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Positive economics; Epistemology; Social science; Philosophy; Economics; Legal realism; Comparative law","score_opus":0.020993031358961353,"score_gpt":0.2891255424777083,"score_spread":0.2681325111187469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1791025234","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0061524482,0.0040373644,0.0012697632,0.9488528,0.0016988433,0.000018191146,0.000077012235,0.000028058997,0.037865564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16547821,0.0024709909,0.00091055897,0.79753697,0.009740717,0.00022498274,0.000053883196,0.00018345105,0.023400132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.991025,0.0035203302,0.00033366485,0.0019382063,0.0019517906,0.0012311264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95318526,0.039683916,0.002134728,0.0011263782,0.0024690551,0.0014006216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017384687,0.00086883747,0.0022729773,0.0029035152,0.024505105,0.019296784,0.0054782457,0.072522715,0.012165883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0363388,0.0012505852,0.0016753841,0.0048471736,0.06319924,0.028694224,0.012997139,0.042589143,0.0025085255],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044253597,0.000040291594,0.0005603692,0.00011802896,0.000020923328,0.00030879222,0.024297906,0.00012035825,0.00007308191,0.6961672,0.27434564,0.003903222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015236018,0.00002836587,0.002599864,0.0014201612,0.00007526583,0.0002803965,0.032994404,0.00045443035,0.0005376963,0.5860715,0.3752662,0.00011933779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035795536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06468602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.072522715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008332169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011126713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.091940165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1798857825","doi":"10.21991/c9995r","title":"THE CHARTER REVOLUTION: IS IT UNDEMOCRATIC?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Legislature; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.062082940363001854,"score_gpt":0.2909810495467232,"score_spread":0.22889810918372136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1798857825","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020071963,0.041851886,0.0029952293,0.5993108,0.0041108043,0.000026408716,0.000100229925,0.00007369102,0.33145902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7518629,0.021426156,0.0017071533,0.10236155,0.0039538327,0.000060698752,0.00014258108,0.00014094992,0.11834418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930987,0.00176064,0.00006854853,0.0005385718,0.0028683157,0.0016652775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967989,0.0014839479,0.00026761764,0.00028590357,0.0006586619,0.0005050073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055969404,0.00034290733,0.00060904626,0.001010516,0.015508444,0.014843121,0.0015759463,0.0046635373,0.0047030617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011668091,0.00023660209,0.00021807669,0.0018346937,0.04077997,0.009264503,0.0027203746,0.00886,0.0005763922],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069730395,0.00000831153,0.00011032552,0.00001747277,0.0000018651773,0.00001874258,0.0025528516,0.000045584206,0.00004022278,0.9471437,0.04027373,0.009780193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022491795,0.00001813641,0.0017963122,0.00019480077,0.0000066575967,0.000027568194,0.007033551,0.00018303574,0.00020958492,0.34975323,0.6407256,0.000028909355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40593618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4856161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40593618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026386507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034794644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8071467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1800594458","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1288","title":"Structure, Substance and Spirit: Lessons in Constitutional Architecture from the Senate Reform Reference","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Constitutional law; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Constitutional theory; Architecture; Meaning (existential); Originalism; Separation of powers; Sociology; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.046306889773417265,"score_gpt":0.3107093154795224,"score_spread":0.26440242570610517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1800594458","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14451593,0.015814321,0.05525194,0.13195707,0.00069287745,0.00006966388,0.00018579552,0.0001392059,0.65137327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9792971,0.0032653771,0.004767392,0.002567033,0.00015775378,0.000030034991,0.000041260915,0.000051132185,0.009823004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933429,0.0043983175,0.00015161466,0.0004099706,0.0012282955,0.0004688499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99298733,0.004344362,0.00028487906,0.00087013934,0.0012963964,0.000216781],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007242298,0.00027689268,0.00048125043,0.0020342923,0.0056639407,0.007770158,0.0013466078,0.00229015,0.0031942772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013276256,0.00032092,0.0003378079,0.0029787293,0.041921034,0.008806899,0.0036493402,0.0055442513,0.00022501887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024502822,0.0000015665781,0.00012544618,0.000012492263,0.0000019671547,0.000038407277,0.00569387,0.00019051033,0.000026583424,0.988929,0.00057934714,0.0043983757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012414798,0.00002657596,0.0013921723,0.00023045478,0.000015430398,0.00008946783,0.011465219,0.0008338886,0.0003525247,0.83838403,0.14716172,0.00003616934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14429282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19191994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9844378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015562192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0148099605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28690588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1802821383","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1006","title":"Legal Rights in the Supreme Court of Canada in 2000: Seeing the “Big Picture”","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03115717487364522,"score_gpt":0.2820236901224373,"score_spread":0.25086651524879205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1802821383","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0883618,0.02501454,0.0016343589,0.5689419,0.0025369152,0.00012965186,0.0025252947,0.00013650078,0.31071904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7308659,0.0117098885,0.0024002295,0.14714581,0.00076945237,0.000099467616,0.00089665776,0.00015453625,0.10595818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98995507,0.00066667434,0.00019913331,0.00089664746,0.0042199,0.004062701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888726,0.0021970468,0.00036221085,0.0002819207,0.00468634,0.0035999361],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005208849,0.0006304429,0.0007204517,0.0028966789,0.03512128,0.023150759,0.0047256993,0.015738292,0.0069922647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01806917,0.0011692925,0.0007956753,0.0049525,0.014339234,0.0057161367,0.003923597,0.015899556,0.0004996951],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007498417,0.00006311597,0.008087509,0.00013147085,0.00006355775,0.0012508642,0.012691027,0.00085954857,0.00045097637,0.6675996,0.27450618,0.03422108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000113054215,0.00003430889,0.030350793,0.0009920803,0.00013571928,0.00023530207,0.0207513,0.001976444,0.0007254343,0.10586681,0.8384245,0.00039421543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9974988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99918526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23440412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23440412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36961535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8879827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1806348090","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1010","title":"The Increasing Irrelevance of Section 1 of the Charter","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Strong","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Deference; Adjudication; Law; Political science; Section (typography); Standard of review; Law and economics; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.03454020563628922,"score_gpt":0.30545051391948946,"score_spread":0.27091030828320023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1806348090","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4467088,0.0070656254,0.013836257,0.061819166,0.0010399246,0.0000746667,0.00018561613,0.0001597072,0.46911025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.978199,0.0010734826,0.0009065844,0.0053008646,0.0002893659,0.000012670107,0.000044613582,0.000021386446,0.014152089],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9817978,0.0026999153,0.0004404501,0.0024214096,0.010039226,0.002601279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94992346,0.02669444,0.008031157,0.0023298073,0.012001109,0.0010199255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01673006,0.00024326322,0.0005735693,0.0018644602,0.0075143357,0.009143068,0.0017267673,0.0029522676,0.0031711478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049696766,0.00035262294,0.00045303346,0.0016113458,0.01910398,0.00376083,0.003118321,0.00710593,0.00022323239],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024742669,0.000014091146,0.0058221384,0.00006120611,0.000012116736,0.00020512912,0.007815827,0.00046012187,0.00060786156,0.9583233,0.0049721845,0.021681322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006174657,0.00040906196,0.107508495,0.0009052763,0.00014987565,0.00090791495,0.014607137,0.0024131988,0.0068093208,0.36930323,0.49659842,0.00032619547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35240158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46823746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35240158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023159537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02344227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70070076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1806762695","doi":"10.24124/c677/2014566","title":"Constitutional Peace, Political Order, or Good Government? Organizing and Assessing Scholarly Views on the 2008 Prorogation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Political Science Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Discretion; Strengths and weaknesses; Politics; Political science; Public administration; Prime minister; Government (linguistics); Order (exchange); Governor; Law; Sociology; Psychology; Engineering; Economics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07202555899951776,"score_gpt":0.34404058495219575,"score_spread":0.272015025952678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1806762695","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58424073,0.017208107,0.005158335,0.15554878,0.00042066327,0.000102391525,0.00013732242,0.00002231882,0.23716128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99355996,0.001997869,0.0007713681,0.0019859534,0.000090346264,0.00003381584,0.000029574016,0.000007926498,0.0015231756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96914613,0.017207192,0.0012138883,0.0018978693,0.007950222,0.0025847268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90935636,0.05962012,0.012733813,0.0043340507,0.011244804,0.002710747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039956745,0.0002245705,0.0006762465,0.008729468,0.00864627,0.017440638,0.0017945598,0.002899304,0.0015357162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07804157,0.00030472744,0.00025073983,0.009459848,0.04242118,0.011134271,0.0046594734,0.0058948286,0.0001502539],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059012487,0.000038620256,0.020299256,0.00024715657,0.000039408198,0.000112821515,0.20982079,0.00035736558,0.00028846244,0.7224497,0.0052298526,0.041057605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023781186,0.00005487413,0.038588095,0.0012660235,0.00004559362,0.00008180106,0.6270195,0.000495221,0.0005459047,0.23053451,0.10126662,0.000077988145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045632593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07387601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9543674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024072342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025304288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21131402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1810894131","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1017","title":"Judicial Power and the Charter: Three Myths and a Political Analysis","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Statute; Charter; Political science; Judicial review; Politics; Nullification; Economic Justice; Judicial activism","score_opus":0.027073074012261434,"score_gpt":0.31015798586508303,"score_spread":0.2830849118528216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1810894131","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033788633,0.03577668,0.020390267,0.70130223,0.0020641459,0.000065135864,0.00016521681,0.000075946875,0.2063717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9204986,0.015447309,0.0066121817,0.034062076,0.009763778,0.0002875429,0.000085970256,0.00011573042,0.013126807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929046,0.0038198864,0.00018146301,0.00078269397,0.0016532625,0.00065809203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830257,0.013204851,0.0011245175,0.0010633542,0.0010021167,0.00057931675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013069339,0.00064209715,0.0007307686,0.0039589973,0.0062090815,0.014152002,0.002600599,0.0067704534,0.004137743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01804494,0.00049951934,0.00072458514,0.002898499,0.08251605,0.021769334,0.0064831227,0.012236582,0.00048654494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063585103,0.0000067785213,0.000076243974,0.0000142689605,0.0000019531917,0.000010552099,0.0012851824,0.00006761996,0.000010568436,0.994191,0.0021558087,0.002173719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019792282,0.0000121680105,0.00024037615,0.00010464466,0.0000034655025,0.000024358533,0.0020201744,0.00039019246,0.00005320357,0.97461843,0.022500398,0.0000127651065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004837892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034230212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9951621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067924503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00420142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06911814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W181756690","doi":"","title":"Prime Minister's Questions in the United Kingdom","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prime minister; Kingdom; Session (web analytics); Prime (order theory); Political science; Law; Business; Politics; Advertising; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09963232056872982,"score_gpt":0.3491114278414512,"score_spread":0.24947910727272138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W181756690","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06008733,0.12973347,0.00035433142,0.43087363,0.011935943,0.00030452784,0.0013578068,0.00010680528,0.36524618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47557744,0.020347532,0.0005529195,0.08331409,0.0013995882,0.00015987398,0.000336151,0.00009196809,0.41822037],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99013805,0.0024021878,0.0007869101,0.0008807225,0.0026270493,0.0031650148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859908,0.0064874557,0.0007383479,0.0005920442,0.0043143067,0.0018770419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008339066,0.0003790498,0.00066721084,0.0014579535,0.01923966,0.012523957,0.0014802219,0.012206983,0.015318857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0292731,0.00080311915,0.0005135346,0.0021192753,0.0057180827,0.0033545992,0.003129967,0.0064543616,0.0020653522],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023671708,0.000043574262,0.0023858608,0.0008090024,0.000029373077,0.0021672214,0.01824694,0.0002468583,0.0007659341,0.2368653,0.7112928,0.026910434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030795258,0.000026737885,0.012028074,0.00041585675,0.000013232377,0.00013346167,0.00675138,0.000051364677,0.00025989785,0.002705202,0.977526,0.000057923942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.79985094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.898327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79985094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05449662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049771193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40265554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1819974348","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1293","title":"Charter Values: The Uncanny Valley of Canadian Constitutionalism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Political science; Statutory law; Constitutionalism; Meaning (existential); Supreme court; Ambiguity; Psychology; Democracy; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0444263019188654,"score_gpt":0.2952148533338901,"score_spread":0.25078855141502465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1819974348","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06714218,0.008065818,0.0064324895,0.13908239,0.0005961185,0.000055046545,0.00028853802,0.00007223322,0.7782653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96117085,0.0029004326,0.001655827,0.005565238,0.00012534882,0.000021571557,0.000055343975,0.00005823849,0.028447175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914118,0.0018442593,0.00011241131,0.000812064,0.003849748,0.0019697226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99303037,0.0023217527,0.0003595483,0.00049324066,0.0029120357,0.0008831848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006080568,0.00031169504,0.00050343707,0.0021993492,0.025134323,0.016165769,0.0012986158,0.002492991,0.004799545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014911014,0.0003305776,0.0003651271,0.003352483,0.045462385,0.0044508004,0.0042966106,0.005866982,0.0002293024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007842685,0.0000026668483,0.00033283353,0.000018616829,0.000002358381,0.000032723012,0.0051973984,0.00015338979,0.000048691534,0.97640914,0.008999061,0.008795299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002211272,0.000015651103,0.007931814,0.00034840667,0.000024250985,0.00007710417,0.016222674,0.0010497788,0.00032347755,0.5250152,0.44888234,0.00008720997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97491306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9859163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1327722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1327722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17895964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9633343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1822634312","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199246687.001.0001","title":"Sceptical Essays on Human Rights","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":171,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Democracy; Politics; Political science; Skepticism; Government (linguistics); Law; International human rights law; Bill of rights; Articulation (sociology); Fundamental rights; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.061843301195930074,"score_gpt":0.3428695796346789,"score_spread":0.28102627843874883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1822634312","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020310096,0.03086916,0.0015029273,0.051360287,0.006261633,0.000023084422,0.00009879697,0.00002806946,0.9078251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13969605,0.038662978,0.0011634983,0.031904258,0.011964138,0.00011388029,0.00021970249,0.00011745939,0.77615803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990281,0.0004471209,0.000024494866,0.000069660564,0.00035098038,0.00007962909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99792755,0.0015128586,0.00007327359,0.000094481766,0.0003060935,0.000085706364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010906009,0.0005657497,0.00028253923,0.0019992257,0.0034576256,0.0042727804,0.00065440655,0.0018376845,0.015932761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003299495,0.0001699343,0.00021634079,0.001611843,0.012536423,0.003498516,0.0014940917,0.003688978,0.0021568595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044848293,0.00000985699,0.000031120857,0.00006034178,9.992245e-7,0.00004482309,0.0021162978,0.00006804087,0.000037835107,0.8514289,0.13955663,0.006640591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037451275,0.000004434189,0.00010963744,0.00037465696,9.900583e-7,0.000036686455,0.0012548749,0.00006201644,0.000039379396,0.09709867,0.9010125,0.0000023926495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065266876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069789444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015932761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004853878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018760319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05330044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1830862541","doi":"10.7202/1024392ar","title":"John T. Saywell. The Lawmakers. Judicial Power and the Shaping of Canadian Federalism. Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 2002. 453 p.","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Mens Revue d histoire intellectuelle et culturelle","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Power (physics); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.02170413434487513,"score_gpt":0.22468845288841363,"score_spread":0.2029843185435385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1830862541","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005487277,0.87168807,0.0010878671,0.07143632,0.0038931777,0.000035956786,0.0021359187,0.000102856866,0.04907111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03086193,0.81843656,0.00342086,0.011063074,0.0030471291,0.00006371862,0.0012445501,0.00037211785,0.13149002],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983537,0.00020989656,0.000114054805,0.00013466163,0.00097313954,0.00021460687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943303,0.0019637211,0.0004206125,0.00014107932,0.0027038325,0.00044051633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014487926,0.0019859408,0.00094547676,0.00727706,0.0077564684,0.0047429167,0.002060493,0.003948393,0.043657135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005008506,0.0015299938,0.000733164,0.017268281,0.00513685,0.0076035447,0.0010916111,0.0045522638,0.015414193],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025381356,0.000008660635,0.00031134018,0.00038658548,0.000010027676,0.000066464636,0.0013845399,0.00008610182,0.00008123056,0.01344285,0.95261794,0.031578854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019055673,0.000008638905,0.004953538,0.0010974293,0.000029352097,0.0000817676,0.0019946077,0.00006750606,0.00019335691,0.016509179,0.974999,0.00004647812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82996786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9502702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17003214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026356615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022087146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34206694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1832873546","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1016","title":"Inclusion, Voice, and Process-Based Constitutionalism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Constitution; Democracy; Fundamental rights; Duty; Constitutional law; Framing (construction); Charter; Law; Sociology; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.017067574949490773,"score_gpt":0.289730102499441,"score_spread":0.2726625275499502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1832873546","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029174307,0.0038597342,0.09903594,0.037102517,0.000633397,0.00017652716,0.00008468937,0.0001368435,0.82979614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9500557,0.0010917326,0.010566376,0.0022033309,0.00046396223,0.00028119382,0.000060911036,0.00009008491,0.03518663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98236084,0.008812221,0.0005786161,0.0023888182,0.0035370616,0.0023224133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917971,0.0047175004,0.00058737287,0.001401977,0.00092696934,0.00056915655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020719605,0.0005505605,0.000799943,0.0022489566,0.011604623,0.014733099,0.0021936963,0.0040818136,0.0052391174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014844543,0.00038224563,0.0009564246,0.0016650591,0.07857821,0.015867624,0.011401902,0.0066627716,0.00064196036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001818507,0.0000022533522,0.00002763242,0.000005666191,7.158642e-7,0.000008362731,0.0012184774,0.000050654486,0.000019453837,0.9975904,0.00013357242,0.0009411039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000952646,0.0000072682383,0.00007582394,0.000038950948,0.000004004329,0.00001821808,0.0006905824,0.00016129915,0.00012464065,0.9752549,0.023609335,0.000005425369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015822237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010588468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020719605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011496016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011726479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10957706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1833416941","doi":"10.14288/bcs.v0i162.272","title":"A Court Between: Aboriginal and Treaty Rights in the British Columbia Court of Appeal","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Treaty; Jurisprudence; Law of the case; Majority opinion; Court of record; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.012690893745926956,"score_gpt":0.2757797758487931,"score_spread":0.26308888210286613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1833416941","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24773599,0.0029154818,0.0005797878,0.057148263,0.00051074394,0.00018641587,0.00058665214,0.00005684832,0.69027984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7787855,0.0007762676,0.0005686999,0.013183159,0.00012530055,0.0001030484,0.000092402115,0.00006025636,0.2063053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939614,0.001071693,0.00016337246,0.00043618953,0.0012230964,0.0031442766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930228,0.0036540949,0.00018846395,0.0003480713,0.0016957802,0.0010908295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004154395,0.0003639287,0.00080611586,0.00170981,0.045071762,0.015825171,0.0032243994,0.012385971,0.019292934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016260833,0.0010522662,0.00045500504,0.0029086112,0.009844909,0.0025707164,0.0039052723,0.015603204,0.00107198],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021926971,0.00010840259,0.0077469326,0.00010532642,0.00005704091,0.0034923025,0.040177163,0.0009179504,0.0011443772,0.7819169,0.14506596,0.019048387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025875831,0.00007677277,0.059345275,0.0013507601,0.00033916158,0.00095252896,0.120710455,0.003913619,0.0018058893,0.13677171,0.67383933,0.00063566456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98475176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99503595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.075467594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.075467594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10509836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5475583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1837442214","doi":"","title":"The Rights' Orchestra: Proportionality, Balancing, and Viking","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Coase theorem; Proportionality (law); Treaty; Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Human rights; Law and economics; Mathematical economics; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.009256480103395255,"score_gpt":0.2780686582298318,"score_spread":0.26881217812643654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1837442214","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028193595,0.008202932,0.037956767,0.055004984,0.000846772,0.00007120394,0.00007092004,0.00005643362,0.8695964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9371073,0.0017916253,0.0069704875,0.008264975,0.0006346571,0.00014768445,0.000034769222,0.00007299701,0.044975523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99217916,0.0043374863,0.00018837281,0.00080996857,0.0013210003,0.0011639635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99616456,0.00249086,0.00028869018,0.00060900464,0.00029110844,0.00015588778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008845311,0.000473205,0.00042989003,0.0014966092,0.0075886096,0.007989767,0.0011898369,0.00494776,0.0056435163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015615331,0.00034110848,0.0005896411,0.0017552343,0.042018842,0.014359298,0.005177298,0.0063007656,0.0006005638],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002396061,0.0000010907686,0.000021559716,0.0000016860547,4.7143e-7,0.000004709108,0.0002742634,0.000020019806,0.0000055911482,0.9980719,0.00081971654,0.00077651296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010018001,0.0000065487216,0.00012463378,0.000033390123,0.0000024077644,0.000021842483,0.0004860264,0.00015971765,0.00010820556,0.95878637,0.040255263,0.0000056908107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007745489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008167029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008845311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004741024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003486844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046779037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W184083580","doi":"10.21991/c91089","title":"FARCE OR TRAGEDY?: JUDICIAL BACKLASH AND JUSTICE MCCLUNG","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Backlash; Economic Justice; Tragedy (event); Law; Political science; Sociology; Engineering; Mechanical engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.06409486659759038,"score_gpt":0.2975601136211885,"score_spread":0.2334652470235981,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W184083580","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0420632,0.012530628,0.0014229054,0.81049937,0.0027539895,0.00003820339,0.00007978468,0.000039452803,0.1305725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7149718,0.0023136756,0.000614481,0.25332838,0.0034187664,0.00009704483,0.000022496271,0.00008804421,0.025145302],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9747171,0.0077856644,0.00096485787,0.004608601,0.004559849,0.0073639653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9478337,0.03684557,0.0034976122,0.0027478153,0.004804028,0.0042712493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025249982,0.0006946123,0.002380092,0.0025986356,0.035892606,0.026116047,0.0068336404,0.07658386,0.01462616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08747717,0.0011524053,0.0012166128,0.0030163687,0.052247528,0.029580338,0.01276773,0.05543411,0.0010748478],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043315627,0.00007567467,0.0005502754,0.00004398156,0.000020535881,0.00043462878,0.010240784,0.0001393557,0.00013095378,0.92272395,0.059635382,0.00596119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000121609,0.000066545865,0.0019337033,0.0005757047,0.000072912015,0.00032280295,0.018236242,0.00056609855,0.0005181656,0.8442084,0.13317361,0.00020410026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08896453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12870297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08896453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0150548145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03381335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17689335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1847759711","doi":"","title":"Rights and the rule of law in the balance","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Law; Political science; Human rights; Rule of law; Due process; Public law; Balance (ability); International human rights law; Reservation of rights; Fundamental rights; Municipal law; Law and economics; Sociology; Right to property; Politics","score_opus":0.046981330048151616,"score_gpt":0.36104031169767514,"score_spread":0.3140589816495235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1847759711","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03973873,0.008748119,0.030563898,0.080720425,0.0009839714,0.00006735761,0.00009802418,0.00006857054,0.83901095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95146096,0.002267187,0.0052483133,0.0060441135,0.0010548974,0.00012065641,0.000055134533,0.00010066521,0.033648033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9835982,0.007710342,0.00063905685,0.0028420002,0.0035176498,0.0016928266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891994,0.006536478,0.00090354186,0.001523599,0.001179289,0.0006575956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015010946,0.00046376674,0.00092124793,0.0018623327,0.009403191,0.019919919,0.0016367822,0.008025022,0.007973747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025455872,0.00056264526,0.0007200204,0.0015281376,0.08668914,0.02537834,0.008732141,0.009342081,0.0013675262],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027142326,0.0000025483027,0.000035840432,0.0000043468226,0.0000013376424,0.00000753158,0.0006628695,0.000043496697,0.000022329321,0.9980185,0.00034577653,0.0008527313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008079347,0.000003992296,0.000076246724,0.000031467524,0.0000019053799,0.000009887287,0.00035488902,0.000060282306,0.00003839897,0.981458,0.017951865,0.00000493248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064314324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037314668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019919919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00707469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006922921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07938647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1848768895","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199664603.003.0001","title":"The Global Model of Constitutional Rights","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":101,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Fundamental rights; Autonomy; Proportionality (law); Judicial review; Democracy; Law and economics; Constitutional theory; International human rights law; Right to property; Law; Constitutional court; Constitutional law; Sociology; Politics; Constitution","score_opus":0.043067364306805925,"score_gpt":0.2405462042838313,"score_spread":0.19747883997702537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1848768895","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00793631,0.0056046797,0.03943879,0.01789985,0.00036229298,0.0000665421,0.00008032353,0.0000795123,0.9285317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83302504,0.00962934,0.022862483,0.009135544,0.0014970514,0.000515316,0.00019766677,0.00020369685,0.12293387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924601,0.0037162204,0.00020568972,0.001085492,0.0017459783,0.0007864871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99577516,0.0026016852,0.00022280053,0.000793619,0.00041190325,0.00019486959],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050358623,0.00040207698,0.0005908498,0.0015847997,0.0030226114,0.010697724,0.0010818626,0.003062207,0.007147268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006154812,0.00026559696,0.00044919166,0.0019341718,0.030395284,0.010735193,0.004063127,0.0058494057,0.0010878003],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.0122643e-7,6.7129247e-7,0.000010613512,0.0000047114654,6.304814e-7,0.0000058543046,0.000281463,0.000062734405,0.0000095839105,0.9979412,0.00051660294,0.001165478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043649356,0.0000054510933,0.00008500605,0.000049151582,0.0000030076649,0.000031609507,0.0003548231,0.000237343,0.000041146875,0.9094052,0.089779675,0.000003336626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021398051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001694804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010697724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005467781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004410285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03967178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1852276984","doi":"","title":"Globalization of Judgment: Transjudicialism and the Five Faces of International Law in Domestic Courts","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Municipal law; Law; International law; Political science; Jurisdiction; Treaty; Comparative law; Common law; Public law","score_opus":0.01106974753380847,"score_gpt":0.26542746290054214,"score_spread":0.2543577153667337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1852276984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25844735,0.00542478,0.035254933,0.030670803,0.00042867172,0.000056823927,0.000017613156,0.00008545004,0.66961354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99480516,0.00036180453,0.001441952,0.0010394654,0.000101433965,0.000023403638,0.0000050386934,0.000024626155,0.0021970791],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9638954,0.02602069,0.001023975,0.0022461144,0.004423096,0.002390892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96846855,0.02049151,0.0030070643,0.0037684243,0.002903901,0.0013605898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0251501,0.0004283638,0.00073572004,0.0032545296,0.013019326,0.016898327,0.0014809557,0.0051516816,0.0030723508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03785809,0.0004963808,0.0005877774,0.0029245813,0.06940797,0.012690799,0.010973951,0.0072828904,0.0003039087],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007949038,0.000010158659,0.0010877281,0.000021992377,0.0000044246353,0.00014394488,0.043319277,0.00012630466,0.000107228036,0.9475784,0.0006782012,0.006914479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029982106,0.00004292298,0.004182721,0.00037883912,0.000027363685,0.00044589804,0.062129617,0.0012092801,0.00063854066,0.8557644,0.07510368,0.000046755857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002876739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004048035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0251501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066644317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005272831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13300806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1863593433","doi":"","title":"Legal reasoning and Bills of Rights","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Principle of legality; Political science; Public law; Philosophy of law; Common law; Comparative law; Sources of law; Municipal law; Civil law (Civil law); Private law","score_opus":0.0711276080582702,"score_gpt":0.367030046113885,"score_spread":0.2959024380556148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1863593433","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013738184,0.005809745,0.119668156,0.046106733,0.001080934,0.00036542863,0.000627773,0.00022206998,0.8123809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75749004,0.0048388727,0.09627987,0.015359834,0.0027731503,0.0015067193,0.0011208622,0.00032290714,0.12030786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9777338,0.008980034,0.0018126781,0.004254597,0.005059125,0.0021598036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886091,0.0060102628,0.0010518343,0.0024460757,0.0014698284,0.00041287177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01688089,0.00095373753,0.0010021114,0.0026932557,0.0062545314,0.013117931,0.0026525168,0.007883987,0.0154293915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02813937,0.0009678888,0.0017107218,0.0020867535,0.036536563,0.016436424,0.005166932,0.008734317,0.00293273],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015493218,0.0000015015855,0.000014291893,0.000004056292,9.1432395e-7,0.000007481631,0.00006197208,0.00004732498,0.0000070885953,0.99871147,0.0005147143,0.000627573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000076078186,0.0000033015936,0.00003570533,0.0000300815,0.0000022279999,0.000019757452,0.000045871653,0.00018811521,0.000024628984,0.98350924,0.01612838,0.0000050074477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006016968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033006978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01688089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007614285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050345105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08927572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1867821508","doi":"10.1515/9781553394518-005","title":"Should Canada Have a Representative Supreme Court?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Impartiality; Law; Political science; Majority opinion; Appeal; Certiorari; Judicial opinion; Supreme Court Decisions; Court of record; Original jurisdiction; Judicial activism; Dissenting opinion; Judicial review","score_opus":0.033605109379356055,"score_gpt":0.2548041082394787,"score_spread":0.22119899886012262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1867821508","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05359725,0.012292156,0.0039345217,0.6768755,0.002963184,0.00009169571,0.00058363244,0.00012995467,0.24953207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7831288,0.0066979146,0.0052595953,0.113493495,0.0008819799,0.00005255952,0.00028281755,0.000107465676,0.09009549],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99165124,0.0010150053,0.00013042368,0.00081053574,0.002879016,0.0035138596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903928,0.0009875428,0.00040595094,0.00027571054,0.0050649885,0.0028730847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049573667,0.00023490659,0.00048547206,0.0010222202,0.026513038,0.011846476,0.0020939163,0.0066694333,0.008795581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018140873,0.00031426206,0.0004885191,0.0020645463,0.010302051,0.0045454125,0.0020300208,0.00649871,0.0009393857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003174581,0.000025702828,0.006310402,0.00009650338,0.000026702459,0.00041647302,0.004928605,0.00034514876,0.00024556153,0.77305794,0.18499193,0.029523298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005910344,0.000036186382,0.015023713,0.0004157931,0.00006463914,0.00025372082,0.013039323,0.0010936677,0.00059523864,0.07227829,0.89698255,0.00015777942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98071194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98848337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.895549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.104451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22791278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7578486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1873709627","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1016","title":"The Myths of Judicial Activism","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial activism; Charter; Political science; Law; Supreme court; Judicial review; Judicial independence; Constitution","score_opus":0.04556992038455407,"score_gpt":0.33264858021313276,"score_spread":0.2870786598285787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1873709627","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012956916,0.023867613,0.0016738591,0.7725769,0.002062022,0.000013527983,0.000054213902,0.00001762599,0.18677737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8390525,0.018166099,0.0011595062,0.10911184,0.013189904,0.00013284545,0.000054132077,0.00007715306,0.019055905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.986292,0.007914979,0.00026579184,0.0016948836,0.0023240068,0.0015082496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9767411,0.017862309,0.0012111216,0.001274183,0.0017308821,0.0011804019],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0170393,0.00034132125,0.00046490252,0.0024176063,0.008815108,0.0115855895,0.002295687,0.009137377,0.0054274993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026882637,0.00030593053,0.00034655313,0.0017210328,0.08683628,0.013596846,0.005053775,0.013656591,0.0007135216],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007798586,0.0000116723495,0.00012077795,0.000027808268,0.0000030515364,0.000025169633,0.005811499,0.000049413262,0.00001750981,0.97115785,0.018947251,0.003820197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029301098,0.000011618316,0.00032730648,0.00028017667,0.000002824172,0.00005414871,0.006593031,0.00012654618,0.00006348745,0.77910674,0.21339615,0.000008707021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004408734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039935545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0170393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072518536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005628343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09011352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1875728696","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Attempt and Enlightenment of China Democratic League (1941-1948)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher education of social science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; China; Political science; Constitution; Enlightenment; Politics; Law; Communism; Socialism; Ideology; Premise; Political economy; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.039812193087742934,"score_gpt":0.3377758574057707,"score_spread":0.2979636643180278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1875728696","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54584247,0.002433903,0.0048577706,0.010345022,0.000486723,0.00041720498,0.00037708873,0.0001233305,0.4351165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9435577,0.00029101144,0.0009856514,0.0011380033,0.00010488897,0.00009725609,0.00009305764,0.000017758599,0.05371468],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99692994,0.0005614711,0.00013299135,0.00060955423,0.00054834224,0.0012177053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894744,0.00028110857,0.00012574712,0.00016026359,0.00026416345,0.00022135871],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004517431,0.00038774975,0.00025648772,0.0016670728,0.010292147,0.005109231,0.00067472947,0.0019502614,0.0037573483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004476503,0.0003400782,0.00032691756,0.0011281306,0.009817615,0.0020239633,0.0028012388,0.0042755324,0.0002353563],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003391722,0.000028631059,0.0030230263,0.000023384775,0.000009370638,0.0001994812,0.0075319326,0.00034460914,0.00067750714,0.97569466,0.0033374715,0.009096107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018727506,0.0002693553,0.05860858,0.00018454666,0.000047083926,0.00032002354,0.0047537102,0.0023183536,0.008120496,0.21045335,0.71456516,0.00017210403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.077741824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10872689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.077741824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01532413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013071511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15457863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1877581437","doi":"","title":"The Charter’s Legislative Override: Feat or Figment of the Constitutional Imagination?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; CONTEST; Legislature; Negotiation; Political science; Law; Power (physics); Politics; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.015314088733205698,"score_gpt":0.2936496110069076,"score_spread":0.2783355222737019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1877581437","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23129846,0.004114658,0.033352524,0.1860231,0.0011346452,0.000039741975,0.00003526556,0.0001550244,0.5438466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98963076,0.0002860283,0.0008248184,0.0030590126,0.00018645634,0.000011278393,0.000004678865,0.000025871757,0.005971256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930831,0.0039726403,0.00011252159,0.0008636043,0.0010897238,0.0008784557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931386,0.0038483944,0.000790086,0.0010976457,0.0005776372,0.00054752897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009238733,0.00018573455,0.00034511846,0.000776677,0.0061620465,0.0078017693,0.0009962037,0.0027242443,0.0040339218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018538333,0.00029315223,0.0003318087,0.000565332,0.05436429,0.009603863,0.0030928308,0.0075837844,0.0003437423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009611044,0.000005960467,0.00020543225,0.0000050149965,0.0000013641919,0.000022745578,0.006312501,0.00006234592,0.000101444595,0.98916954,0.0010689155,0.0030350557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003436218,0.000100419136,0.0020188014,0.00010872831,0.0000127413305,0.00012058517,0.0141486935,0.00088566943,0.0008368042,0.86105233,0.12063655,0.000044254317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011156454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009690728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98884356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00658682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053779166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048859656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1881373036","doi":"","title":"R v. NS: What's Fair in a Trial? The Supreme Court of Canada's Divided Decision on the Niqab in the Courtroom","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Supreme Court Decisions","score_opus":0.025247989992996257,"score_gpt":0.2669166410101549,"score_spread":0.24166865101715862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1881373036","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.067987114,0.0111919325,0.0036876395,0.46833998,0.0042563975,0.00037312135,0.0007068886,0.00015615766,0.4433007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65798116,0.003542754,0.002945171,0.21958116,0.0011790922,0.00025730112,0.00019526744,0.000108674394,0.11420942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97999156,0.004280622,0.00068938744,0.0019976203,0.0057260166,0.007314773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883845,0.004842809,0.0003489172,0.00047940147,0.0036536234,0.002290777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018457504,0.00061853946,0.0009866882,0.0012777008,0.035306234,0.014445523,0.0041430355,0.018599031,0.0054525994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041271847,0.00072031445,0.0007760063,0.0016377143,0.016713008,0.004538139,0.0033651427,0.016791614,0.0008397839],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018563992,0.000058798563,0.004606635,0.00013701343,0.00007857357,0.0013404792,0.010114465,0.00050957594,0.00063733297,0.7205059,0.23815039,0.023675183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036610657,0.00014542285,0.012519395,0.0014357868,0.00035362146,0.00044718018,0.026150303,0.0022225415,0.0016959897,0.18415767,0.7700581,0.0004478271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95556164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9807407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07414101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07414101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15209144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53793323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1883379657","doi":"","title":"Constitutions as \"Living Trees\"? Comparative Constitutional Law and Interpretive Metaphors","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Comparative law; Supreme court; Legislature; Opposition (politics); Constitutional law; Adjudication; Public law; International law; Municipal law; Constitutional court; Constitution; Politics","score_opus":0.03571265365967889,"score_gpt":0.2901464939763798,"score_spread":0.2544338403167009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1883379657","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06882357,0.017128682,0.08482064,0.043752376,0.00093401346,0.00009921649,0.00018877516,0.00021522357,0.7840376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9694818,0.002841533,0.012625019,0.0019788563,0.00026360556,0.00017644893,0.00008261473,0.00010447963,0.012445577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928464,0.005211838,0.00012950045,0.00046089457,0.00086046394,0.000490942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961183,0.002788738,0.00023971683,0.0004851168,0.0002172929,0.00015075269],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067621055,0.0004544019,0.00051426375,0.0043058023,0.0057515143,0.011973253,0.0015017428,0.0032683033,0.0067238235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008977501,0.000298925,0.0005300142,0.0037076229,0.054686226,0.019409612,0.004138729,0.0050161807,0.0004716837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.56287e-7,0.0000013095972,0.0000133346875,0.000004433801,4.7625596e-7,0.000008993398,0.00157409,0.000044646382,0.000011524626,0.9974995,0.00020438645,0.00063629623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007004692,0.0000070702495,0.00016577909,0.00006909448,0.0000031294824,0.00004710864,0.0042232764,0.0005001178,0.000058634574,0.9429492,0.051962513,0.000007060243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037328233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00446315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011973253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008367411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002480905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060710073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1887905165","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1091","title":"Political Litigation and the Role of the Court","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitutionality; Appeal; Politics; Law; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Legislation; Political question; Government (linguistics); Law of the case; Judicial review; Court of record; Law and economics; Original jurisdiction; Sociology","score_opus":0.016121078018414343,"score_gpt":0.2795073531652398,"score_spread":0.26338627514682544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1887905165","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03883356,0.021987835,0.0044654696,0.22579654,0.000891824,0.000041629573,0.000044346332,0.000033986857,0.70790476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9554702,0.0038973698,0.00065910205,0.016943857,0.00091151026,0.0000495079,0.000014622481,0.000028698152,0.022025153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9658451,0.02188869,0.00053232565,0.0023559127,0.0047741714,0.0046038064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9569004,0.03380666,0.0022896044,0.0011979457,0.0036422545,0.002163039],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026340455,0.00029155097,0.00053131056,0.003302529,0.018283233,0.025295075,0.0023070013,0.011100867,0.00661434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04283183,0.00039540156,0.00036163576,0.0028084754,0.05432356,0.009126228,0.0040139384,0.010336647,0.00080349494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028196139,0.0000072933367,0.00014655697,0.0000088841325,0.000001890459,0.000043602722,0.0014440733,0.00006280271,0.00002983019,0.99344796,0.0026606955,0.0021435553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039267532,0.000026321677,0.0017622119,0.00025894414,0.0000136395865,0.0001025853,0.0075310813,0.00084409124,0.00033132284,0.8282062,0.1608477,0.00003660353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05793936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05624768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05793936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028024869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027469305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20333558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W189285409","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.894327","title":"Social Rights in Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.007075265438936638,"score_gpt":0.24103286789818573,"score_spread":0.2339576024592491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W189285409","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15006384,0.010994576,0.00061512145,0.13895476,0.0010440892,0.00018090825,0.0027073696,0.00010563613,0.6953337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5714485,0.0035206184,0.000749688,0.014195334,0.0001883746,0.00009728974,0.00045481764,0.00008914571,0.4092562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.992269,0.00057818973,0.00015900626,0.0005403079,0.0019265603,0.0045270626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943686,0.0008829121,0.00017774728,0.00019280893,0.0022464746,0.0021314232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025481367,0.0005034006,0.0010886078,0.0034597637,0.037073154,0.014155613,0.0021295757,0.0065249065,0.03765622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008734623,0.0006374582,0.0007746727,0.005794599,0.006365699,0.0026077104,0.004225891,0.0073131905,0.0014477645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079238984,0.0000977512,0.0088836085,0.000119013755,0.000043428034,0.0003894418,0.006899815,0.000877598,0.00019103744,0.8086814,0.14349903,0.030238552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000110326684,0.000045251563,0.040513545,0.0004700742,0.000082227125,0.00014177417,0.019207727,0.0013529123,0.0003921909,0.049212106,0.8883094,0.00016243983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99777716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99905795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19481608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19481608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.39528012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9338992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1893164503","doi":"","title":"The Theory and Doctrine of Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendment in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Doctrine; Supreme court; Constitutional amendment; Political science; Constitutional law; Constitutional economics; Constitutional theory; Substantive due process; Politics; Originalism","score_opus":0.027957670682635292,"score_gpt":0.27644448429230295,"score_spread":0.24848681360966765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1893164503","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047013197,0.008394761,0.014338417,0.05766647,0.0004613329,0.00013854519,0.00047081042,0.00008437625,0.87143207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9382143,0.006762561,0.0070013897,0.0055761393,0.00019760008,0.00006413184,0.00013221038,0.00004237106,0.042009242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99507904,0.00080967916,0.00015888944,0.00066178624,0.0018907145,0.0013999438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955249,0.0016297094,0.00034296882,0.00022061102,0.0017782478,0.0005035953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034295847,0.0002648578,0.00053140934,0.0029904835,0.014670092,0.007956287,0.0019715081,0.0032146105,0.005136764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010336695,0.00039375797,0.00041427228,0.004116807,0.035745084,0.00294288,0.0027629554,0.0051675006,0.00029230074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017826359,0.0000019946037,0.00032420852,0.000009364371,0.0000016283814,0.000038920698,0.0009313473,0.00025654415,0.00001758082,0.99415946,0.0017508421,0.0025064065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003219821,0.000016170834,0.0064592757,0.00039657412,0.00004243522,0.00013095548,0.0037247534,0.004126545,0.0002932082,0.7553824,0.22930214,0.00009328393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9817422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98302263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.123021014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.123021014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21111417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8925841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1893729068","doi":"","title":"Judicial Independence in Context","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial independence; Independence (probability theory); Law; Judicial activism; Context (archaeology); Political science; Judicial review; Judicial discretion; Judicial opinion; Supreme court; History","score_opus":0.010977170621309023,"score_gpt":0.2806175236896603,"score_spread":0.26964035306835127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1893729068","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020708378,0.009135518,0.0037263597,0.013596359,0.00091911276,0.000026087326,0.00006976338,0.000028400986,0.95179003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9412132,0.0048149084,0.0012981315,0.0034665603,0.0010922329,0.000054139287,0.00008874013,0.000071569026,0.04790048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958359,0.0018588813,0.00012699404,0.0005374742,0.00088765746,0.0007530894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99715936,0.0011990836,0.00024745706,0.00043467604,0.00048825637,0.00047119785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019796875,0.00037512768,0.0004960688,0.0015204714,0.010218661,0.010524969,0.0009672605,0.0014499555,0.008067286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063586095,0.00035112433,0.0003416885,0.0018821296,0.022264553,0.005500221,0.0053257328,0.005277888,0.00086271256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067615506,0.0000059968716,0.00030425904,0.000021557538,0.000003419741,0.00007691926,0.0057769096,0.00008425408,0.00006404202,0.98150074,0.006970922,0.005184278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017260583,0.000017659799,0.0022983951,0.00031961725,0.000015006942,0.00020384483,0.008665653,0.00013610283,0.00017748719,0.3840706,0.60405993,0.000018462742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015104049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02622134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015104049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006668233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007174765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048381686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1893794509","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2011.00867.x","title":"Deference on Questions of Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Presumption; Law; Judicial deference; Political science; Delegate; Competence (human resources); Legislature; Standard of review; Statutory interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Judicial review; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16117987959311303,"score_gpt":0.3499320435283463,"score_spread":0.18875216393523325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1893794509","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09088803,0.06251297,0.039167218,0.16243216,0.0057128957,0.00018284377,0.00018613893,0.00009534913,0.6388224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9367232,0.0085146,0.0035307838,0.024747737,0.005127664,0.00013047969,0.0000454306,0.000029208619,0.021150926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97405165,0.013092778,0.0011947886,0.0028398845,0.0072415504,0.0015792814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9470038,0.03663555,0.0027531872,0.005524967,0.0068886224,0.00119386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026089186,0.00031385248,0.0008946088,0.0026611912,0.004137961,0.0069046067,0.0016505632,0.0045666057,0.004109834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09205003,0.00037554043,0.0005400651,0.0014916458,0.032772865,0.009312893,0.0057540317,0.0062006954,0.000535352],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000134338825,0.000010124906,0.00025818823,0.00008715527,0.0000073530423,0.00007846432,0.0031599372,0.00006587507,0.00016082969,0.98448807,0.0028523055,0.00881833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014703372,0.000042000487,0.0008444765,0.00031356662,0.000012752405,0.00013644544,0.0011180994,0.00012384415,0.00016116576,0.9118417,0.085378766,0.000012640104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035934967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029888009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026089186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004806141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005070043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1379745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1896563657","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12157","title":"<i>Comparative Matters: The Renaissance of Comparative Constitutional Law</i> . By Ran Hirschl. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. 320 pp. $45.00 cloth.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"The Renaissance; Citation; Constitutional law; Law; Sociology; Classics; Art history; History; Political science","score_opus":0.06757439367169296,"score_gpt":0.31484427646528285,"score_spread":0.24726988279358988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1896563657","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005163001,0.8306151,0.0010666593,0.09793913,0.0049847355,0.000007749551,0.0001173721,0.00003851984,0.06471446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1315551,0.69929504,0.00401818,0.035997566,0.023014093,0.000102493585,0.00048191563,0.00022760806,0.10530807],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981352,0.001029399,0.00005826019,0.00019531895,0.00047201535,0.000109728804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974279,0.0016502901,0.00019802988,0.00017744988,0.00040109927,0.00014528356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029868872,0.0006006437,0.0005307622,0.002684152,0.002104356,0.0061400384,0.00093800336,0.0023461138,0.015373756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008493519,0.00044204548,0.00036132627,0.0035608776,0.0105630355,0.009454166,0.0017283922,0.0038177532,0.0021219642],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014483076,0.000006728752,0.00013957138,0.00038151798,0.000010794875,0.00003464862,0.0010994709,0.00008039123,0.000087153836,0.34829065,0.60666066,0.043193854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043625087,0.000008685231,0.00083467516,0.0009869802,0.000004584138,0.000081928316,0.0009687754,0.00007097313,0.00008229887,0.11539512,0.88155335,0.000008213732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015006837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030572418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015373756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005944432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003925487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051430345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W189890627","doi":"10.21991/c9nq2v","title":"GUN CONTROL AND JUDICIAL ANARCHY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gun control; Control (management); Political science; Law; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.03405555251579101,"score_gpt":0.2670749701080727,"score_spread":0.23301941759228167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W189890627","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49130866,0.002670419,0.004135868,0.015356384,0.00013235686,0.000048299917,0.000053510623,0.000014811641,0.48627973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99693143,0.0001240236,0.00009882028,0.0003218431,0.00005343608,0.000008972466,0.0000032460377,0.0000021475264,0.0024560315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99139446,0.0036631916,0.00025979694,0.00094283145,0.0014089929,0.0023307747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96758336,0.023909206,0.0036523608,0.0017120965,0.0017945516,0.0013484731],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008422275,0.00022962097,0.0004799265,0.0023946443,0.006466746,0.00833207,0.0013585091,0.004689775,0.010832532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02801048,0.0003381467,0.00044889207,0.0019160989,0.029098207,0.006546797,0.003492905,0.005751896,0.00035887002],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032330463,0.00007144044,0.0021039878,0.000012036723,0.000008453086,0.0000780047,0.003209643,0.00022220876,0.00014943494,0.9909203,0.00051345763,0.0026787692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012042942,0.00010736925,0.018655341,0.00008226032,0.00003520467,0.00018923004,0.0103199305,0.0012353077,0.00069751363,0.94737965,0.02113243,0.00004521624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073470613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008041643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010832532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034322436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004409774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044541776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1899518710","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1209","title":"The Patriation and Quebec Veto References: The Supreme Court Wrestles with the Political Part of the Constitution","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Supreme court; Veto; Parliament; Political science; Convention; Constitutional court; Politics","score_opus":0.07659455001087731,"score_gpt":0.29898326633194566,"score_spread":0.22238871632106835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1899518710","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056886453,0.01537093,0.0050509223,0.14798222,0.001424805,0.00010251627,0.00040837494,0.00006839328,0.7727054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83613485,0.0033391956,0.002218746,0.05007583,0.00043183978,0.00011498706,0.00014551579,0.00005588453,0.10748317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98854244,0.002700522,0.0002349361,0.001373726,0.0049468493,0.002201515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99080396,0.004718198,0.00037492756,0.00056381203,0.003126128,0.00041305152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062729362,0.00028209214,0.00045835483,0.0018570484,0.018900203,0.011064128,0.0022712206,0.008747468,0.0040065334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021873603,0.0005006994,0.0004914564,0.0029823156,0.013724759,0.002912552,0.0020167937,0.011469073,0.00034058126],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009776705,0.000005449304,0.000463708,0.000016737182,0.0000069012303,0.00012266159,0.0026209673,0.000102432765,0.000101064295,0.96843797,0.022025332,0.0060870117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008904785,0.00005680168,0.011441476,0.00051492994,0.00006306224,0.00018226617,0.004729287,0.0012020326,0.0010400919,0.2122146,0.7683027,0.00016378796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91823846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96249956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.946424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05357597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06397695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38872272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1903199879","doi":"","title":"L’Influence Du Contexte Économique Et Idéologique Sur La Conception De L’Être Humain Par Le Droit Et Le Juge Constitutionnels: Les Cas Canadien, Indien Et Sud-Africain (The Influence of Economic and Ideological Context on the Development of the Human Being by the Law and the Constitutional Judge: The Case of Canada, India and South Africa)","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Constitution; Humanities; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Ethnology; Social rights; Sociology; Law; Human rights; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015640264736901877,"score_gpt":0.22146007782159938,"score_spread":0.2058198130846975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1903199879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14372203,0.011681433,0.004119394,0.07209896,0.0002945488,0.000058071164,0.00017822166,0.000019296387,0.767828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98351616,0.001399721,0.00042895187,0.001738077,0.000067949404,0.000029010691,0.000017724647,0.000016907978,0.012785417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961688,0.0016169897,0.000055644727,0.00028945916,0.000579482,0.0012895357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973578,0.0016154073,0.0002665084,0.000119002754,0.0003952628,0.00024602812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032620556,0.00040428567,0.00033266484,0.0019217655,0.015130215,0.015046861,0.0012186551,0.0030084006,0.005478425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037971316,0.0003037679,0.00040619905,0.0021121537,0.044396777,0.0037944014,0.0035315577,0.0054602586,0.0002972123],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048847974,0.0000036123572,0.0003514784,0.000009625899,0.0000028788086,0.00009817837,0.008419502,0.00009135743,0.000044864537,0.9895766,0.00076184864,0.00063510105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062321924,0.00003390828,0.015029481,0.0006892223,0.000059735255,0.00040430558,0.0877177,0.00092111493,0.0008087592,0.4954788,0.39869526,0.00009940587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5078789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04236959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02172163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8134972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1903413972","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1107","title":"The Legitimacy of the Juridical: Constituent Power, Democracy, and the Limits of Constitutional Reform","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Constitution; Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Law and economics; Power (physics); Subject (documents); Law; Separation of powers; Constitutional economics; Sociology; Politics; Computer science; Physics","score_opus":0.017036571260529678,"score_gpt":0.2834947803804395,"score_spread":0.26645820911990986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1903413972","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23444524,0.008494582,0.048186075,0.10941661,0.00041186874,0.00008610066,0.00008437222,0.000116123825,0.5987591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942334,0.0005445764,0.0017774837,0.00081981666,0.00018441284,0.000058378322,0.000009707976,0.00001799444,0.002354203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9825618,0.010326631,0.0007288104,0.0015195343,0.0036324617,0.0012307108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95486355,0.035098463,0.0027433506,0.004087475,0.002178699,0.0010284979],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020136077,0.00020533457,0.000842436,0.0020875183,0.0074403286,0.012449876,0.0014454123,0.005542556,0.0036481163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0567014,0.0004537223,0.00039805044,0.001554407,0.074538015,0.017891336,0.0070170136,0.0076343017,0.00037279032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050498847,0.0000053414014,0.00014078271,0.0000075814755,0.0000012142988,0.000012303227,0.00084891333,0.00007803804,0.000042345964,0.99758434,0.00013142529,0.0011426773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015698477,0.000009818705,0.0004057929,0.000046350313,0.0000037632674,0.000027541097,0.0005910443,0.00032056714,0.00013054053,0.9918566,0.006584556,0.000007800594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031134528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027191911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020136077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060189157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006955425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10649103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1904988749","doi":"10.21991/c9g38c","title":"A Principled Approach to the Positive/Negative Rights Debate in Canadian Constitutional Adjudication","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; State (computer science); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Algorithm","score_opus":0.01772730111569473,"score_gpt":0.2619739155655011,"score_spread":0.24424661444980636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1904988749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012600599,0.004015392,0.13794659,0.18861552,0.0013434995,0.00035039664,0.00024710692,0.00009851011,0.65478235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8470658,0.0023756963,0.0745273,0.020602334,0.00086023967,0.00057326205,0.00008634645,0.000098497956,0.053810503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9617656,0.017966988,0.0009361282,0.002755076,0.013618943,0.002957248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98982006,0.005322458,0.0004085354,0.0008506793,0.0030521369,0.0005462992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04173675,0.000668987,0.0008112059,0.004124758,0.020702591,0.017208947,0.0043570898,0.00803805,0.0046003703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023923399,0.00076904596,0.000989238,0.0039849696,0.07785015,0.0065410994,0.006275461,0.012084008,0.0005093771],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021943233,0.0000016587112,0.00003509485,0.000010195286,0.0000014962429,0.000011105787,0.0010309078,0.00006857464,0.000033742243,0.9963414,0.0010568532,0.001406706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022844848,0.000007047645,0.00036427574,0.00012770214,0.000012645526,0.00002892862,0.0012693186,0.0007177086,0.00016258909,0.94030654,0.056951173,0.000029282855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49200588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6805299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5079941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050944466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1108008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9782842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1915046536","doi":"","title":"The Declining Influence of the United States Constitution","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Constitutionalism; Political science; Mainstream; Law; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.03870910728818699,"score_gpt":0.3228733625618576,"score_spread":0.2841642552736706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1915046536","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23119427,0.025061075,0.0030192726,0.056711584,0.0012635931,0.000043812543,0.0017125615,0.000172837,0.680821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9686794,0.0068862475,0.0014695979,0.0068699606,0.000456393,0.00003057561,0.00090405904,0.00009490378,0.014608902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99095625,0.0032439888,0.00033536833,0.0015011335,0.0032530786,0.0007101363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9769668,0.010809374,0.0027875404,0.0027834335,0.0054490226,0.0012039222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008117964,0.00017506003,0.0003553668,0.0057910616,0.0021176585,0.0042409063,0.0005247566,0.00080709934,0.0059428187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02859403,0.00018950064,0.00037030538,0.005436931,0.0039889803,0.0024251381,0.0025254462,0.0023810216,0.0008250771],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009944326,0.00003949925,0.027510118,0.00026226073,0.00010707898,0.00028305323,0.008488104,0.00092566886,0.00080519903,0.6730261,0.06891612,0.21953744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022035372,0.00006425046,0.115851946,0.0006739134,0.000057454068,0.00023679552,0.0041890475,0.0005136918,0.0009619953,0.026964122,0.85040563,0.0000590832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03698259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04334902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03698259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058777407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036020349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07353467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1921496057","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2733","title":"Who Writes? Gender and Judgment Assignment on the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Gender gap; Psychology; Demographic economics; Economics","score_opus":0.03413679573157492,"score_gpt":0.2494576433647676,"score_spread":0.2153208476331927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1921496057","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81226337,0.0026362534,0.00069045497,0.046880223,0.000761222,0.00004122714,0.0006889379,0.000052167805,0.13598613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840136,0.00050177716,0.000086311615,0.0014244699,0.00007967932,0.000004624691,0.000059050573,0.000021061596,0.013809392],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944507,0.0011330693,0.00013275971,0.00040974302,0.0019261304,0.0019476033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98933303,0.002627007,0.0018210704,0.00026277802,0.0032431227,0.0027129755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032210154,0.00016849267,0.00035862328,0.0012947873,0.012571718,0.0043302253,0.00086230953,0.0009510602,0.008869917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026637787,0.00020204793,0.0001495083,0.0017160085,0.0038111473,0.0012847608,0.0014862594,0.0016570569,0.0010243523],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005702727,0.00016141792,0.41518882,0.00013729186,0.000110045075,0.002421442,0.17049323,0.0007183982,0.0032280644,0.11987119,0.12716752,0.15993227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045374487,0.00012017638,0.5279969,0.0005532892,0.00007445487,0.001201396,0.23538087,0.0012706314,0.0026389798,0.015760886,0.21478347,0.00017358869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8375687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93216825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1624313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01588717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020769175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32677573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1922063759","doi":"10.24926/26390742.1599","title":"Proportionality and Pretense","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional commentary","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Judicial review; Law and economics; Political science; Scope (computer science); Human rights; Law; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.0482812790387966,"score_gpt":0.3224097474795693,"score_spread":0.2741284684407727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1922063759","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011815055,0.005637784,0.03751055,0.038508043,0.0012786955,0.00011496313,0.000085930646,0.000074682335,0.90497434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8992007,0.0029722543,0.012698641,0.0142782815,0.0017598543,0.0004237337,0.00008085148,0.00012953008,0.068456225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9836294,0.0073676785,0.00094043714,0.0032345,0.0034439461,0.0013840428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877983,0.007051131,0.0008897074,0.0021044717,0.0017476708,0.00040865346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015306844,0.00056684465,0.00071885344,0.0020199788,0.0070967106,0.010505362,0.0018794413,0.0051218164,0.0081651565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027623285,0.0004673568,0.0006768278,0.0012443471,0.07470968,0.016525418,0.0069055483,0.009430444,0.0014411336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016579982,0.0000014926973,0.00001830504,0.0000051135535,6.72871e-7,0.0000064773435,0.00034914684,0.000016983891,0.000011586471,0.9982266,0.0005066135,0.00085540005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000770124,0.000008802209,0.00007645547,0.0000516493,0.0000027421802,0.000032921183,0.00028061305,0.00010301621,0.00009864227,0.9597069,0.03962306,0.0000074920613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040061832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026582894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015306844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058002714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055803116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08095127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1924136381","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004860","title":"Proportionality, Balancing, and the Cult of Constitutional Rights Scholarship","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Cult; Scholarship; Vocabulary; Politics; Constitutional law; Law; German; Political science; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.019803944092618545,"score_gpt":0.29651002073596644,"score_spread":0.2767060766433479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1924136381","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0439262,0.018644292,0.050311223,0.2797483,0.002022909,0.000043747823,0.000058940816,0.00009073314,0.6051537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95633805,0.005087925,0.007176386,0.011707188,0.0019933237,0.00009356394,0.000033762517,0.00010394313,0.017465899],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.974101,0.015504811,0.0007024812,0.0020887044,0.0062288493,0.0013740659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97942346,0.016095456,0.0010378492,0.0016029272,0.0011605948,0.0006797903],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025189454,0.00054335466,0.00086025166,0.002978126,0.012272304,0.018945593,0.0023433163,0.005855107,0.00468152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035479177,0.00052024744,0.00052468036,0.0028362751,0.1118339,0.023240983,0.01042211,0.010401936,0.0005749075],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013204021,0.0000023429109,0.0000204952,0.000005742303,7.0816105e-7,0.000006281853,0.001235019,0.000028227569,0.000009719833,0.99677867,0.0005233054,0.0013881852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061903193,0.0000029697853,0.000060480485,0.00004889958,0.0000013127416,0.000012715589,0.00094736693,0.00013567861,0.00003870688,0.9783952,0.020346848,0.000003639823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068967477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005619847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9877277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012320842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008412114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1332162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1927553831","doi":"","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada in the 21st Century","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Charter; Legitimacy; Institution; Legislature; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.02114937332904549,"score_gpt":0.25661073366255693,"score_spread":0.23546136033351145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1927553831","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036352552,0.16354506,0.0022874074,0.32385442,0.0051162643,0.000046707828,0.00051817275,0.00010621902,0.46817324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75949,0.056227535,0.002169597,0.056458667,0.0021475386,0.000036907913,0.00026227676,0.00008472221,0.123122826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99326164,0.0008273166,0.00012591542,0.0007064081,0.003110838,0.001967848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933188,0.0009739765,0.0002852975,0.0001764844,0.003759224,0.0014862015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033733647,0.00034045824,0.00047265142,0.0026181915,0.020297345,0.015339709,0.0015760679,0.0046603293,0.0051791794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011204119,0.0003139383,0.00027452063,0.005096536,0.020339753,0.0033110376,0.0023853555,0.004865371,0.00037528598],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012348932,0.000007278598,0.0015243043,0.000051669555,0.000009783334,0.0001606791,0.003730525,0.00035823663,0.0000890243,0.8958421,0.07587932,0.0223347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000098786695,0.00000846545,0.0066134827,0.00034511051,0.00001488412,0.00007429373,0.0029599094,0.00026986262,0.00010532546,0.049513407,0.9400355,0.000049836137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9913737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99544597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17375226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17375226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25536755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9583303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1932181148","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01714.x","title":"Abortion Law Reforms in Colombia and Nicaragua: Issue Networks and Opportunity Contexts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Development and Change","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"ASTER","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Legislature; Latin Americans; Abortion law; Politics; Unitary state; Political science; State (computer science); Law; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Development economics; Family planning; Economics; Population; Research methodology","score_opus":0.10343690055498943,"score_gpt":0.28840716961645285,"score_spread":0.1849702690614634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1932181148","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7355202,0.011123825,0.00122784,0.015066079,0.00009919153,0.00015431098,0.0001953438,0.000021104133,0.23659219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951644,0.0015479982,0.00024846467,0.00025989726,0.000026337433,0.00005734193,0.00004676266,0.0000050299004,0.002643715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.996887,0.0017623472,0.000069727845,0.00026563878,0.00032051204,0.00069469126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99595,0.0021438128,0.00091658364,0.00012152183,0.0003678298,0.0005002239],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002804624,0.00021154844,0.0003564646,0.0032493423,0.0064103995,0.008448039,0.0008024173,0.0013178531,0.004345426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009201111,0.0002063786,0.00014239804,0.0038618534,0.0063782465,0.0034036343,0.0048981416,0.0014029633,0.00014551819],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028677436,0.00014453575,0.108828045,0.00062724156,0.000067755725,0.003110434,0.27162284,0.0022622028,0.0012185341,0.52557987,0.0052648378,0.080986924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057843306,0.000084025174,0.25583786,0.0007359936,0.00008515715,0.0003879723,0.39252156,0.0017898099,0.00077690545,0.03476181,0.31287235,0.00008875419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1104499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17540191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1104499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01843202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053207716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21961403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1933262150","doi":"","title":"New Models of Constitutional Review","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Legislature; Parliamentary sovereignty; Law; Judicial review; Constitution; Declaration; Commonwealth; Bill of rights; State (computer science); Enumerated powers; Legislation; Separation of powers; Politics","score_opus":0.02190690712874527,"score_gpt":0.2899303972521911,"score_spread":0.26802349012344584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1933262150","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005934352,0.008708956,0.28403857,0.03746231,0.001626556,0.00030897107,0.00026944128,0.00033866297,0.66131216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57499176,0.01174017,0.15874678,0.013642702,0.0061348323,0.0017541457,0.0004935114,0.00056531304,0.23193084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97680694,0.012163086,0.00088724005,0.003953831,0.005111212,0.0010776847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97488934,0.015441537,0.001348051,0.0047985497,0.0028030202,0.00071940495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023531327,0.0008170954,0.0009774468,0.0032375755,0.004120613,0.0150772715,0.0029756718,0.0057675783,0.017324999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032143995,0.00073110615,0.0015646196,0.0028627492,0.02484048,0.022132171,0.0050235735,0.00902083,0.003795117],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012511738,0.000001706574,0.000010604564,0.000006498638,9.688231e-7,0.0000046740715,0.000071295995,0.00012585096,0.0000068127424,0.99811965,0.0005442411,0.0011064672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011249226,0.0000065009667,0.000021519469,0.000025953052,0.0000031623986,0.00002562536,0.000047349535,0.000965001,0.00003104243,0.95600474,0.042851143,0.000006739993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034254212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003553112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023531327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011832886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00676125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12444705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1933635745","doi":"","title":"Xenophon Contiades (ed), Engineering Constitutional Change: A Comparative Perspective on Europe, Canada and the USA","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Current Legal  Issues","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Political science; Regional science; Geography; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05351227577359906,"score_gpt":0.3161960410140116,"score_spread":0.26268376524041254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1933635745","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014395978,0.9199155,0.0006313324,0.054099526,0.002999707,0.000010007528,0.00015546914,0.000015848265,0.020733124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026135774,0.9338549,0.0010808642,0.011306025,0.0022388215,0.00002273723,0.0001272717,0.00003200008,0.025201637],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992337,0.00020651532,0.000040724888,0.000091415764,0.00032938799,0.00009829082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853253,0.0009881685,0.000091045295,0.000022008433,0.00028809984,0.00007815893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014600549,0.000898354,0.0005403313,0.003869562,0.0032542495,0.005313014,0.0013120308,0.0052044108,0.0073680114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022439717,0.00045111793,0.0003868747,0.010195009,0.0022721922,0.0054174443,0.0012208266,0.002761395,0.0014478243],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071255716,0.00008068095,0.0019698655,0.0009692694,0.00003656725,0.00023332752,0.0037138888,0.0011605311,0.00020847167,0.17211142,0.6587049,0.16073996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025072472,0.000018173794,0.006061093,0.002500119,0.000052154897,0.00027775508,0.0050066053,0.00046022807,0.00034426176,0.034687154,0.9505133,0.000054022163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36410046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63418907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63589954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008098919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008479184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7239623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1941960932","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781316178560","title":"Constitutional Conventions in Westminster Systems","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; Legislature; Government (linguistics); Political science; Constitutionalism; Separation of powers; Politics; Constitutional law; Law; Parliamentary sovereignty; Power (physics); Corporate governance; Basic law; Law and economics; Democracy; Constitution; Public administration; Sociology; Sovereignty; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.04937109953748621,"score_gpt":0.2504936465690152,"score_spread":0.201122547031529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1941960932","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0137888985,0.009968869,0.008291585,0.0040650014,0.000213961,0.000061742176,0.00008986262,0.000059842798,0.9634603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6834333,0.0137712285,0.009475943,0.0017862355,0.00038813028,0.00024842113,0.00020303774,0.00011581404,0.2905779],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981668,0.0008712065,0.000108603825,0.00029158284,0.0003724596,0.00018926777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900144,0.00046417062,0.00010982916,0.00023208167,0.00015004823,0.000042457752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019882605,0.00031839727,0.00027026288,0.00109984,0.003281423,0.007963423,0.0005038896,0.0012483972,0.006219948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037799033,0.00024401404,0.00013842333,0.0017784651,0.015137046,0.005970055,0.002021806,0.0020275656,0.000997083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.137689e-7,7.0339433e-7,0.000016740862,0.0000051074517,2.993511e-7,0.0000046047553,0.0010559356,0.00005276532,0.00001556508,0.9958627,0.0008676228,0.002117293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045618235,0.0000067016367,0.00027290275,0.00010577875,0.0000027002686,0.000036039106,0.00085808727,0.00020419619,0.00017641405,0.5114981,0.48682714,0.00000734327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0118017765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010816882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0118017765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007941822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036646018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057622254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1942658000","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2008.00039.x","title":"Canada's Trial Courts: Two Tiers or One? <i>Edited by</i> PETER H. RUSSELL","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Politics; Library science; Sociology; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.044145286240999046,"score_gpt":0.2731947626808374,"score_spread":0.22904947643983836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1942658000","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035279705,0.34036273,0.0010597738,0.36252895,0.018584678,0.000065880056,0.002685672,0.00015022435,0.27103415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18163916,0.23995417,0.002303535,0.04170092,0.007986534,0.000095455114,0.001532967,0.00025866844,0.52452856],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980292,0.00024967373,0.000056001114,0.00014072478,0.001127955,0.0003964076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962419,0.0008044072,0.00012043804,0.00009595832,0.002273147,0.000464166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015286382,0.0007272089,0.0005763582,0.0030179678,0.00946687,0.010899787,0.0018327171,0.003565393,0.009977097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006239071,0.0006404415,0.00032570152,0.0066730073,0.0071785646,0.002478881,0.0010693077,0.0036403635,0.0014813958],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048701577,0.0000034858465,0.0001789597,0.000071967996,0.000002984396,0.000028447841,0.0006662674,0.000109881665,0.0000323655,0.05599552,0.9320523,0.010852873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007377693,0.0000026531238,0.00295052,0.00042262214,0.000008776288,0.000038084996,0.0021324249,0.00016073714,0.00007616792,0.012296473,0.98187906,0.00002501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9729302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9923423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0748348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0748348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14324446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.542967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1943095161","doi":"","title":"Law-Based Administration: The Key to Building a Rule of Law Government","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administration (probate law); Rule of law; Government (linguistics); Democracy; Public law; Political science; Law; Political law; Key (lock); Administrative law; Point (geometry); Municipal law; Law and economics; Chinese law; Sociology; Politics; Computer science; Mathematics; Computer security","score_opus":0.04927142240458667,"score_gpt":0.3107900135397665,"score_spread":0.26151859113517983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1943095161","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012452201,0.0044670426,0.119041234,0.2543164,0.0022937136,0.00039841,0.00012392427,0.00035373427,0.6065534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84063977,0.0036140725,0.05826214,0.02403476,0.002080751,0.0004685636,0.00014590102,0.0003500381,0.07040409],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9770687,0.009162225,0.0012249114,0.0030583139,0.006552363,0.0029335713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9676897,0.011572481,0.0024628274,0.0049199956,0.007900621,0.0054542543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028951123,0.00040602154,0.0011402691,0.0018115323,0.010928155,0.021029748,0.002375729,0.008251013,0.0069358265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03786319,0.0007359185,0.0006370689,0.0015058509,0.06270256,0.016091915,0.008000996,0.014575713,0.0037375716],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024307885,0.000014961557,0.00013705355,0.00001671271,0.0000031415668,0.000022672624,0.0011806746,0.00014481456,0.0000916691,0.9904698,0.0040175854,0.003898404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012341983,0.000017722088,0.0004966413,0.00013408248,0.000004429183,0.000049787173,0.00093426293,0.00031659286,0.00029741816,0.85912216,0.13858804,0.000026582191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019514566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013765718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028951123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010168751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04482821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15311003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1947709505","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1264","title":"Dissents and Concurrences: Seven Debates in Charter Jurisprudence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Supreme court; Dissent; Dissenting opinion; Sociology","score_opus":0.03247950035206516,"score_gpt":0.32322906412091046,"score_spread":0.2907495637688453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1947709505","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39578986,0.04498257,0.007847115,0.2617451,0.005485779,0.0002443311,0.00019734974,0.0001616841,0.28354615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94652265,0.0047389106,0.0022847147,0.029614633,0.0012484526,0.00011604215,0.000079944984,0.00008419733,0.015310453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9532743,0.021389995,0.0016611147,0.0024620094,0.016118268,0.0050944057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.952378,0.038498014,0.001122299,0.0010265454,0.004994118,0.0019810707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039193626,0.0006985871,0.0010715704,0.0039227377,0.04419708,0.020421542,0.0028121474,0.010571112,0.0016337187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048022214,0.00069815683,0.00098772,0.003632026,0.041508935,0.006859213,0.012168038,0.016814679,0.00030704384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058176254,0.00004436533,0.0011183833,0.00010134631,0.000019713825,0.0019232488,0.18274364,0.0003581554,0.0005062389,0.75837964,0.026186783,0.028560305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083990184,0.0000836459,0.0063934308,0.001061249,0.00005862665,0.0006734277,0.21540292,0.0012155004,0.0025809177,0.22702408,0.5450538,0.0003684065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07841118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10028261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07841118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033128105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022200929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24036235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1953784351","doi":"","title":"Subconsitutional Constitutional Law: Supplement, Sham, or Substitute?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legislature; Supreme court; Judicial review; Political science; Judicial restraint; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Politics; Judicial activism; Sociology","score_opus":0.06626359908998686,"score_gpt":0.30370589106186485,"score_spread":0.237442291971878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1953784351","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03457257,0.038424868,0.04786174,0.38152206,0.009803839,0.00007097212,0.00019017809,0.00029533007,0.4872585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80477875,0.016256858,0.021434909,0.08776861,0.014926858,0.00021782613,0.00018133508,0.00024153273,0.05419333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908919,0.004826186,0.00041857458,0.0009200188,0.0023034539,0.0006399572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98274535,0.01087696,0.0008704651,0.0033657209,0.0016183417,0.00052315515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012544755,0.0004985024,0.0010502012,0.0017896965,0.0019522839,0.0096667595,0.0024055054,0.007160415,0.009011133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02307269,0.0004172573,0.000647509,0.002256478,0.031676922,0.01939613,0.005646565,0.0076870476,0.0019039984],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052430228,0.0000058150363,0.000072612405,0.000023449466,0.000001856052,0.00005034422,0.000530369,0.000026266138,0.0000511461,0.98850507,0.0045059426,0.0062220115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015765048,0.000026252223,0.000175279,0.0001613682,0.000007636766,0.0002800192,0.0009111536,0.00074798,0.00012909368,0.8622613,0.13526775,0.000016511689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019874137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025322349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012544755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029204157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037494758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066343784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1957592722","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-28299-7_14","title":"Judicial Independence in Canada: A Critical Overview","year":2012,"lang":"de","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Independence (probability theory); Judicial independence; Politics; Political science; Law; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07767666892778896,"score_gpt":0.3319626028589598,"score_spread":0.2542859339311708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1957592722","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015502009,0.4349714,0.001594029,0.21448517,0.0036929548,0.00014065852,0.0009175702,0.00006792448,0.32862827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37286973,0.46691,0.002129628,0.07259777,0.003612645,0.000259697,0.00059685635,0.00021916971,0.08080447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98849547,0.0012431453,0.0002982479,0.0007106748,0.00421326,0.005039187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98567355,0.0040748543,0.0004760951,0.00026477163,0.008078707,0.0014320997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059003527,0.0012949347,0.0014692274,0.01545978,0.03391363,0.023440493,0.0044884933,0.010687086,0.010022205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02035676,0.0013033592,0.0012784762,0.03320075,0.0219672,0.007429477,0.0040133246,0.012863735,0.0006146433],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030202296,0.00005128283,0.001430355,0.00059010956,0.000037528087,0.00030053937,0.006311058,0.00072799064,0.000059423404,0.7365949,0.22091535,0.032951206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024859382,0.000014121262,0.009059126,0.0028426761,0.000084079926,0.00015384979,0.01462031,0.0005600543,0.00017269266,0.053712215,0.9186136,0.00014234359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99575657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9973346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6886767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.31132326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4726213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79876745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1958936762","doi":"10.21991/c98374","title":"The Constitutionality of Prorogation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Parliament; Prime minister; Context (archaeology); Political science; Meaning (existential); Law; Governor; Constitutional law; Original meaning; Law and economics; Constitution; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; History; Engineering; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05385636001912841,"score_gpt":0.28924830508521077,"score_spread":0.23539194506608235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1958936762","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028554387,0.002739701,0.0019438324,0.031774864,0.00038854094,0.000021351427,0.000113472466,0.000043878816,0.93441993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.922922,0.00067546853,0.00032720825,0.0035487886,0.00016542446,0.000031294763,0.000038183574,0.000042473657,0.0722491],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921468,0.0031226515,0.00015999452,0.0011702514,0.0011514882,0.002248831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965153,0.0015342948,0.00023551333,0.00049279747,0.00074760127,0.00047446726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060859243,0.00020671338,0.0003354392,0.00084752653,0.019204834,0.012795059,0.0009996012,0.0032528206,0.013416725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011376513,0.0003671182,0.00020704951,0.0011300171,0.03241944,0.0065287286,0.0035514103,0.00648905,0.0011987654],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069709895,0.0000027187668,0.00010878838,0.0000050221074,8.715462e-7,0.000022945578,0.0026340664,0.000016630134,0.000039598533,0.991211,0.0045036436,0.0014477153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002928561,0.000023816254,0.003116997,0.00016168339,0.000008447633,0.000076118595,0.011869951,0.00015910494,0.00048828626,0.34939572,0.6346304,0.00004019953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1353963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1864419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1353963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019762548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016548334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26921642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965374745","doi":"10.7202/1006417ar","title":"The Place of Legitimacy in Legal Theory","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Legal positivism; Legitimacy; Epistemology; Jurisprudence; Legal formalism; Sociology; Law; Political science; Legal realism; Legal profession; Philosophy; Comparative law; Politics; Black letter law","score_opus":0.04223338448784949,"score_gpt":0.28434318212507254,"score_spread":0.24210979763722304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965374745","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041464537,0.014352387,0.1975816,0.22202833,0.0021123842,0.00012256799,0.00011422391,0.00031686501,0.52190703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9732731,0.0024194124,0.013040578,0.00316798,0.0024189036,0.00019894341,0.000055191824,0.00014517028,0.005280775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95243573,0.03041047,0.0017308242,0.0038207849,0.009357077,0.0022451654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87775093,0.09932054,0.0036988484,0.009718851,0.0071608443,0.0023498647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04036398,0.0010098034,0.0020533928,0.007673666,0.012602737,0.019976104,0.002891996,0.0099446075,0.004549343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.076949015,0.0010277334,0.0013685505,0.0030611951,0.13285773,0.03672752,0.012772704,0.014290401,0.00099141],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026300013,0.0000035764228,0.00006910577,0.000012014258,0.0000021257956,0.000011464161,0.00039586812,0.00008595825,0.00001140623,0.99833614,0.00017082486,0.00089899945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069789885,0.0000044958692,0.000042063082,0.000029691815,0.0000021223257,0.000012287899,0.0001234625,0.00028855618,0.000026291422,0.9967673,0.0026932291,0.0000035356225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034082863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018353715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04036398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012002074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009821362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21346772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966412407","doi":"10.1353/utq.2012.0074","title":"Federalism and the Constitution of Canada (review)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Constitution; Parliament; Dual federalism; Law; Political science; Federalist; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.010100376058611787,"score_gpt":0.21448319563203255,"score_spread":0.20438281957342078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966412407","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000059193706,0.9937523,0.000020523608,0.0026868861,0.0007938724,0.000011406008,0.00020402373,0.0000066719867,0.0024651468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001274042,0.99482685,0.000047854726,0.0018493674,0.00034218063,0.000012802016,0.00027512037,0.000004645262,0.0013671466],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998643,0.00011288253,0.00011158773,0.000120226905,0.0007986442,0.00021368168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965049,0.00056469435,0.0003238142,0.000048210986,0.0022204195,0.00033787923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011135123,0.0009909605,0.0016153582,0.0070383563,0.0014706083,0.003803979,0.0017610899,0.0017653779,0.015608494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064226934,0.0005534379,0.0008835803,0.018173331,0.0018200747,0.0023540189,0.0012551825,0.002617365,0.002615472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004449393,0.000017489567,0.00044080173,0.027755402,0.00015462532,0.00008877286,0.00012587156,0.00020687938,0.0000887704,0.004446055,0.68432397,0.2823069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023377113,0.000010643328,0.0044387546,0.029748095,0.00016691606,0.00016808583,0.00017599628,0.000039714796,0.000039905004,0.00090146955,0.964257,0.000029957579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.54221517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.702148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98173076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018269239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.071690045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9209616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966968079","doi":"10.1017/s0020589310000655","title":"JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING AND TRANSNATIONAL LAW: A SURVEY OF COMMON LAW SUPREME COURT JUDGES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Precedent; Political science; Majority opinion; Judicial independence; Comparative law; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.09705707278559123,"score_gpt":0.34795742791395806,"score_spread":0.25090035512836684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966968079","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99668914,0.0003795262,0.00012230966,0.0003717559,0.000007489667,0.000012722698,0.00003388587,0.0000014743121,0.0023816044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993591,0.00015760913,0.000036792982,0.00008476226,0.0000050365607,0.0000075089997,0.000029867584,0.0000017575712,0.00031757075],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936381,0.003344067,0.00043547523,0.00050185766,0.0011173183,0.0009631656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9753395,0.010871641,0.0055217305,0.0008194735,0.004558759,0.0028888884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072086817,0.00015906988,0.0004464258,0.0031299847,0.002655746,0.003741757,0.0005421725,0.00094744394,0.003231847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026407316,0.00030671555,0.00018353555,0.0034566512,0.002295662,0.002141393,0.0019102477,0.001302181,0.0004205331],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008819832,0.00020633332,0.64932615,0.00007307004,0.0000436052,0.00059619383,0.32190755,0.0001344828,0.0009311794,0.0037605383,0.0018879839,0.021044757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001583324,0.00028700978,0.49707448,0.00021801573,0.000021248286,0.00072592736,0.4832499,0.00076339045,0.0003131404,0.0017340455,0.015542105,0.00005502867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01889493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030534219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01889493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012045285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013075306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038123548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969192061","doi":"10.1086/674453","title":"Theorizing the Constitutional Revolution","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Courts","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Subject (documents); Character (mathematics); Order (exchange); Political science; Political economy; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.020128829349175592,"score_gpt":0.28055381707631194,"score_spread":0.26042498772713635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969192061","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05695663,0.006097938,0.042554576,0.07008514,0.0006154853,0.00007620104,0.0001293947,0.00009993862,0.8233847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854615,0.0011902563,0.003518861,0.002141184,0.0002673611,0.00007133217,0.000047631165,0.000027918952,0.0072739697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99396014,0.004076201,0.00011557439,0.000560069,0.00073684123,0.0005512184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921779,0.0057168817,0.00044983736,0.000851354,0.0004724062,0.0003317361],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009139467,0.00029743536,0.00039544867,0.002925683,0.004447911,0.0069482257,0.001666303,0.0038954385,0.006473734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010580138,0.00023881617,0.0005232921,0.0021103343,0.05919548,0.008462379,0.0053995433,0.0052704006,0.000462429],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.060783e-7,0.0000019377258,0.00003400638,0.000004242299,5.266665e-7,0.000009841513,0.0004906347,0.0001052992,0.0000067260594,0.9987392,0.00026672514,0.0003400264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073333003,0.000004439019,0.00008618555,0.00003811611,0.0000028848715,0.000017597915,0.00085450703,0.0004665012,0.000031135733,0.98137957,0.017109035,0.0000028109682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037414068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030009884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009139467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072972146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004209965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052945256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969659142","doi":"10.1093/icon/moq007","title":"Reassessing the new Commonwealth model of constitutionalism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Commonwealth; Normative; Parliamentary sovereignty; Political science; Optimal distinctiveness theory; Law and economics; Constitutional theory; Politics; Sovereignty; Law; Separation of powers; Public administration; Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.040872359185949954,"score_gpt":0.35352177569854604,"score_spread":0.3126494165125961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969659142","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09181655,0.01842387,0.046501562,0.24995008,0.002173951,0.00007837434,0.000093034025,0.0001500645,0.59081244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9578579,0.005124154,0.0058017946,0.007144885,0.00065077073,0.00005453484,0.00003510683,0.000084529434,0.02324634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9845595,0.005693925,0.0003681511,0.0015139382,0.0052866656,0.0025779076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939091,0.0026320324,0.00039690553,0.00086829654,0.0015530701,0.00064048904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010927294,0.00032429607,0.00069798616,0.0025587645,0.00914091,0.014547898,0.001923819,0.0042048665,0.002509942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011343143,0.0003601429,0.0004953322,0.001691506,0.074183606,0.015974885,0.0064305146,0.008419683,0.00037022508],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028463992,0.0000027189196,0.00011412715,0.000011418904,0.0000014320815,0.00003648318,0.005093883,0.00010689727,0.000034858473,0.99050975,0.0012274074,0.0028582294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002188883,0.00003220111,0.0017705115,0.00027279073,0.000013078223,0.00019420218,0.013554343,0.0013667258,0.00023259365,0.7236744,0.25880796,0.000059367376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3985177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41529435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3985177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053245243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03511126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7923961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970695725","doi":"10.7202/042990ar","title":"Patterson v. McLean: A Confirmation of the New Right at the U.S. Supreme Court","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Presidency; Law; Conservatism; Presidential system; Political science; Civil rights; Economic Justice; Ideology; Power (physics); White (mutation); Politics","score_opus":0.010645468340683662,"score_gpt":0.23692937924674895,"score_spread":0.22628391090606528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970695725","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6033961,0.0056015197,0.00035313083,0.13975339,0.0012067829,0.00006176892,0.00013204063,0.000035052977,0.24946018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9490829,0.0009001813,0.0001335067,0.026091963,0.00023965935,0.000024722296,0.000025534035,0.000009021698,0.023492476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968927,0.001082084,0.00006640837,0.0003642618,0.0008612724,0.0007332368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947339,0.0035961904,0.00044738798,0.00014555207,0.0005818403,0.0004950967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003220529,0.00019342478,0.00028553998,0.0009616397,0.01637934,0.0045904918,0.0007287667,0.0042802403,0.004375657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013678956,0.00036702474,0.00025512633,0.00083468814,0.007448489,0.0021374351,0.0024245093,0.008767303,0.00031746732],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031617825,0.00019065979,0.02743351,0.00023841862,0.00006120207,0.014605047,0.20501155,0.00030352097,0.003924444,0.47051454,0.22705936,0.05034163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018078313,0.00062005117,0.07777066,0.000836911,0.00009202028,0.0039396505,0.14311267,0.0005052001,0.0069158776,0.03479697,0.73099864,0.00023047155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14586782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35473904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14586782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007137212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008653781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29003757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972489427","doi":"10.4000/ethiquepublique.426","title":"Libérer les juges : éliminer la politique (et les politiciens) de la sélection des juges","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Éthique Publique","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Nomination; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.048678570805141846,"score_gpt":0.31219663298211403,"score_spread":0.26351806217697216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972489427","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23505539,0.004848015,0.00536302,0.034491133,0.00025801937,0.00007218907,0.00008965586,0.00005723509,0.7197653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89493215,0.0014308352,0.0008746792,0.0022866973,0.000094683426,0.000041339244,0.000024786368,0.000027486682,0.1002873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958263,0.0013293138,0.00007344315,0.00037052674,0.0009440876,0.0014562639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976539,0.0007121497,0.00024480018,0.00028311947,0.00062918686,0.00047698067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040404927,0.0002416688,0.00035061786,0.0012468838,0.011335017,0.009237943,0.00079454907,0.0014272594,0.008722711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006306847,0.00023250854,0.0001411761,0.0014683184,0.01846974,0.0019332101,0.0029937057,0.0033810425,0.0010428418],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002141086,0.000017689019,0.00335283,0.000041770374,0.0000062479035,0.00011505059,0.0173302,0.00021459318,0.0003583805,0.95351845,0.006168089,0.018855194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059563863,0.000088537796,0.040109504,0.0006241102,0.000032438093,0.00023365988,0.04342312,0.0008225039,0.0011175305,0.20067288,0.7127408,0.0000753179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10268483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2674695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10268483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011998495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017561978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20417428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972677636","doi":"10.1007/s10982-012-9165-y","title":"The Law’s ‘Majestic Equality’","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Philosophy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Aphorism; Law; Compliance (psychology); Philosophy of law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Public law","score_opus":0.06362493942019706,"score_gpt":0.31778195334914827,"score_spread":0.2541570139289512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972677636","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02522597,0.0066845743,0.014399265,0.14832132,0.0028389413,0.000034035227,0.00012657253,0.0000617968,0.8023075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91654134,0.0010509945,0.0031680556,0.016320636,0.0035423539,0.00006911636,0.000051873398,0.000060653547,0.059195034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934642,0.00305003,0.00023724338,0.0009461519,0.0015450646,0.0007573414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956226,0.0021437309,0.0002832018,0.0009881161,0.0006043935,0.00035798596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00586513,0.00041032015,0.0007494161,0.001831559,0.0065371525,0.009497571,0.0013934823,0.0063807946,0.009249865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011854847,0.00041994386,0.00045015613,0.0012347432,0.06250676,0.0112553965,0.005423344,0.010413511,0.0009540897],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014025102,0.0000018596621,0.0000091969605,0.000002761373,5.408283e-7,0.0000027826513,0.00029382642,0.000005443529,0.000010757875,0.9981748,0.0010254172,0.00047125705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008457404,0.0000054703664,0.00011730877,0.00001854449,0.0000020330024,0.000031791074,0.0003799297,0.000052077354,0.000060880477,0.958446,0.04087281,0.000004681052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038139778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004092794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009497571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003952425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004056678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031018138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973614520","doi":"10.5235/20414005.4.4.512","title":"Two Models of General Jurisprudence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transnational Legal Theory","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Variety (cybernetics); Scholarship; Law; Contrast (vision); Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.023176342841521234,"score_gpt":0.29457069948896153,"score_spread":0.27139435664744027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973614520","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04393223,0.008200236,0.21527725,0.12527126,0.0010279599,0.00024884508,0.00027338407,0.0002753575,0.6054935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91608435,0.002441765,0.033087313,0.0146233365,0.0007957768,0.00053995417,0.00021976471,0.00013393715,0.03207388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98848224,0.005309846,0.0004493068,0.0018620879,0.0027375906,0.0011590222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99036914,0.0047494904,0.0005865333,0.0021458948,0.0014472315,0.0007016816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011349337,0.0005958115,0.0010201781,0.0028020393,0.0034160146,0.008632867,0.0036143248,0.0074150525,0.00489741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01732224,0.0006296674,0.0014167589,0.0024561384,0.037969485,0.013929769,0.006228741,0.008532834,0.000763177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018733637,0.000002857601,0.000031181753,0.0000056268455,8.807173e-7,0.0000075699363,0.00057258026,0.00006737951,0.0000074699306,0.9983779,0.00040082098,0.0005237027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009039,0.0000053520403,0.00013283474,0.000020704414,0.0000020354425,0.000039516854,0.00024675386,0.0005071764,0.000020449992,0.9888439,0.010167762,0.000004602251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007297028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055803405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011349337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008171515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037676988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060021758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974261986","doi":"10.7202/043294ar","title":"La procédure nécessaire pour modifier l'article 93 de la Loi constitutionnelle de 1867","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010316534353498226,"score_gpt":0.2594509155154339,"score_spread":0.2491343811619357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974261986","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1062196,0.007285472,0.022948582,0.028491938,0.0026758974,0.0015282885,0.0010123213,0.00026806712,0.82956976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6781636,0.003850801,0.024084568,0.033358626,0.0012061684,0.0028384982,0.00061614986,0.00025783706,0.2556238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9827115,0.0042156912,0.0013414342,0.0022463284,0.006291023,0.0031940865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869687,0.00704564,0.0013332452,0.0013149105,0.0030112383,0.00032616075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012804658,0.0005675872,0.00068400084,0.00269982,0.007956671,0.0068586925,0.0018331027,0.0054247947,0.009235093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021559035,0.00067543716,0.0012249121,0.002569422,0.00810431,0.001984483,0.0032010954,0.008718953,0.0019722749],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009238484,0.00008553764,0.0031352665,0.00027390377,0.000046925907,0.00035507407,0.01639642,0.00077247614,0.004235602,0.9107964,0.026522871,0.037287164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000097010336,0.00018551694,0.02198623,0.000806959,0.00016084792,0.00023007773,0.003934931,0.0004966879,0.007669627,0.039049517,0.9251726,0.00020999744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1600075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2435365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9832347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016765324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025839336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3181523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976031580","doi":"10.1093/publius/pji010","title":"Shaping the Constitutional Dialogue on Federalism: Canada's Supreme Court as Meta-Political Actor","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Federalism; Politics; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Political question; Democracy; Constitutional court; Constitutional law; Constitution; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.08276134096458518,"score_gpt":0.30945985077585153,"score_spread":0.22669850981126635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976031580","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14476815,0.0073691434,0.021932732,0.23182447,0.00063360267,0.000110927824,0.00030310068,0.00012161714,0.59293634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97838223,0.0008367073,0.0025990182,0.0069687986,0.000089954076,0.000026361438,0.000030352885,0.000031833766,0.011034866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915036,0.002851922,0.00014646763,0.0008096059,0.0019061,0.0027822934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99325,0.0032302397,0.00027588537,0.00032951427,0.001949091,0.0009653666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008785244,0.0003126349,0.00055084313,0.0020808815,0.030549524,0.017324341,0.0022744017,0.0048481906,0.0034418246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013543369,0.00040757895,0.00043281732,0.0025987704,0.031053217,0.0042222426,0.0043000574,0.007888487,0.00017066517],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055974137,0.0000031882123,0.00066892966,0.00000763856,0.0000045789443,0.00007653615,0.007934239,0.0003807648,0.00009213507,0.9842482,0.0038948134,0.0026833222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006492114,0.000020806478,0.007061493,0.00042452983,0.00008432596,0.00009618689,0.030346958,0.0044418466,0.00067177904,0.53129387,0.4253565,0.00013680433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97894406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98842144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1634058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1634058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1997238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97033066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977326750","doi":"10.1353/utq.2005.0003","title":"Brian Dickson: A Judge's Journey (review)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Courage; Compromise; Charter; Law; Biography; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.01645860650249682,"score_gpt":0.24759195929207406,"score_spread":0.23113335278957725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977326750","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000051513114,0.8941013,0.00006549874,0.06939682,0.029563539,0.000034480334,0.00013497885,0.00003624027,0.0066154976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020682185,0.8414003,0.00027760182,0.102072336,0.01986627,0.000170595,0.00041707238,0.000053007112,0.0336746],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965906,0.00053674803,0.00040444874,0.00029011382,0.0019018892,0.00027626785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880435,0.001957878,0.0008819638,0.00022010859,0.007135757,0.0017608764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029705311,0.001247126,0.0021071245,0.0029843338,0.0021240332,0.0069952477,0.0024190352,0.0058443923,0.03624295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016878637,0.00076046184,0.0010716164,0.0057181153,0.0018431874,0.0039127604,0.0017200885,0.006712299,0.021297438],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005910535,0.0000025359539,0.000030482815,0.00082704565,0.00000671135,0.000035189314,0.00001784856,0.0000069060707,0.000011552584,0.0002557675,0.9791877,0.01961235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011161529,0.0000049272976,0.00027137756,0.0033897473,0.000014695946,0.00014374043,0.00008343713,0.0000053592225,0.000008460527,0.00021350314,0.9958454,0.000008259724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03375329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08077857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03624295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062426664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02048999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12124479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977448376","doi":"","title":"Judicial Hegemony: Dworkin's 'Freedom's Law' and the Spectrum of Constitutional Democracies","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Democracy; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.01396226834492001,"score_gpt":0.23998729793611726,"score_spread":0.22602502959119725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977448376","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20580909,0.005129163,0.02056639,0.06924598,0.00016647222,0.000033410703,0.000053223754,0.000044034754,0.6989523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99441564,0.00052043895,0.001165305,0.00088791305,0.000055650722,0.000012795541,0.000007607078,0.000005751951,0.0029289539],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971506,0.0011411761,0.000060143117,0.00033665798,0.0007467496,0.0005646694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99796414,0.0013373109,0.00014455544,0.00019260985,0.00017771943,0.00018369744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003551903,0.00021268244,0.0003894206,0.0024576494,0.0062957495,0.006795565,0.00065006147,0.002429387,0.002081851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055578705,0.00016138045,0.00022724087,0.0015750763,0.030449344,0.0078295525,0.003457154,0.0030222782,0.00014624011],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002712122,0.0000035588143,0.000073128445,0.0000017130442,3.8598506e-7,0.00001029832,0.00062743586,0.000048136455,0.000025336536,0.99739456,0.00034009555,0.0014725324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009887458,0.000005054404,0.0003447401,0.000013039453,0.000001162749,0.000020175454,0.00087676465,0.00027279783,0.00004929953,0.98897284,0.009430113,0.0000042063957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018211914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0163153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018211914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066296817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033512115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048101902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977498393","doi":"10.5539/res.v7n8p221","title":"Correlation between Concepts of Legal Position and Decision of Body of the Constitutional Justice","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of European Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Phenomenon; Constitutional court; Scope (computer science); Position (finance); Russian federation; Political science; Economic Justice; Enforcement; Legal research; Legal realism; Sociology; Epistemology; Business; Philosophy; Computer science; Constitution","score_opus":0.0833321627097433,"score_gpt":0.3886245833660857,"score_spread":0.3052924206563424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977498393","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2937333,0.017650202,0.050496425,0.013115228,0.000583707,0.0002640077,0.00029416342,0.00004269532,0.62382025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900609,0.0013531598,0.0049609514,0.00035436035,0.000105648425,0.000053415526,0.000062268584,0.000015656224,0.0030336087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99050355,0.0043813167,0.00066944445,0.0015569442,0.002125382,0.00076327496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9729835,0.01802953,0.004171154,0.00096998573,0.002439295,0.0014066125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075686723,0.00024597754,0.00033501748,0.0045831525,0.0021044041,0.0071409596,0.00093877595,0.001815496,0.00691926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022299826,0.00020335037,0.0003133881,0.0043324996,0.019415762,0.007851278,0.0035644476,0.0026875392,0.0005156671],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022612989,0.000029816545,0.0048873415,0.000095055184,0.000010359154,0.00008141984,0.0045609935,0.00013694554,0.00019360712,0.97403616,0.00053974026,0.015405881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033599183,0.00014323412,0.047064256,0.00070268643,0.000033880144,0.00042456604,0.020727552,0.0011832474,0.0007062404,0.8560507,0.07285321,0.0000767426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014672595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001408177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075686723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003932793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003450484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04002744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977789285","doi":"10.1017/s000842391000106x","title":"Women Lawyers before the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Voting; Political science; Law; Supreme Court Decisions; Economic Justice; Disadvantage; Civil liberties; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03298838640294578,"score_gpt":0.25374221623662646,"score_spread":0.2207538298336807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977789285","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86015654,0.003201874,0.0010144484,0.02014273,0.00037294638,0.00022205664,0.004742804,0.00006012102,0.110086545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9540723,0.00088505924,0.00018006166,0.0014348683,0.00009274138,0.000029144434,0.0006921635,0.000013141513,0.042600513],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951148,0.00033985774,0.00007702692,0.00055241643,0.0013985329,0.0025173915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925403,0.0016018419,0.0014456001,0.00021135877,0.0019711598,0.002229671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016364752,0.00034415413,0.0009956581,0.0013366606,0.008194093,0.00491082,0.0014930064,0.0016973532,0.03659492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009555323,0.00036845542,0.00093956117,0.001899833,0.0016520409,0.0011717622,0.0016063919,0.0026694376,0.0013147666],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007539082,0.00033528608,0.7767425,0.00030417074,0.00049733365,0.002149166,0.013386468,0.004969966,0.0009486002,0.04173913,0.07915079,0.0790227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020974553,0.0003062412,0.7467691,0.00079998537,0.0005827963,0.00043815584,0.03710878,0.007868947,0.00088582915,0.008153499,0.19669029,0.00018667754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9836488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99260473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05770092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05770092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07300627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4186514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978172711","doi":"10.1093/icon/mot041","title":"Constitutional reengineering: Dialogue's migration from Canada to Australia","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Business process reengineering; Status quo; Commonwealth; Charter; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Statutory law; Law; Public administration; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.026057979926160168,"score_gpt":0.2839040057802027,"score_spread":0.25784602585404254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978172711","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6110739,0.0045182845,0.0047544385,0.049855407,0.00046890357,0.00013934095,0.00014183685,0.00008595213,0.32896194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9763148,0.001001756,0.00095070567,0.0031264434,0.000027603952,0.000034875335,0.00003643333,0.000034538753,0.01847286],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99209166,0.0027732367,0.00014671365,0.0008211987,0.0019935756,0.0021735202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919485,0.003669383,0.0004092901,0.00045886976,0.0021758298,0.0013381792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064338734,0.00028904676,0.00039553505,0.0017042462,0.034779307,0.009845625,0.0016471501,0.0030058916,0.004061048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014124386,0.00026897195,0.00038288732,0.0027680763,0.018118905,0.0040598526,0.007704074,0.005971674,0.00018599028],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004473299,0.000028596205,0.0032169875,0.000092078444,0.00001307534,0.0013151238,0.58800983,0.0004920092,0.0010759899,0.36606655,0.007840702,0.031804297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016647022,0.00003947905,0.018432755,0.00028106148,0.000028543502,0.0004701809,0.35401708,0.0014042325,0.0011033989,0.021964937,0.6021032,0.00013859196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9586266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9615791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13211292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13211292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12413087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9585508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978698280","doi":"10.7202/042938ar","title":"The Constitutional Prism of Louis-Philippe Pigeon and Jean Beetz","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Character (mathematics); Point (geometry); Prism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Law; Federalism; Sociology; Political science; Politics; Physics; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.009611361199412922,"score_gpt":0.24335179512509864,"score_spread":0.23374043392568572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978698280","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06155976,0.017726988,0.008813194,0.34580472,0.0016348698,0.00003218232,0.000090175905,0.00008872537,0.56424946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9492222,0.0025946945,0.0017556682,0.016786434,0.00079044106,0.000057355657,0.000023010572,0.000043669686,0.028726522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957575,0.0024692458,0.00007632406,0.00050920213,0.00085347024,0.0003342561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99517906,0.0037013958,0.00027327632,0.00021843934,0.00036274307,0.00026498197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037652224,0.0002415898,0.00025167872,0.0013030266,0.009094817,0.01016518,0.00067666714,0.0030956445,0.0033799005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0097971475,0.00022108456,0.00015596286,0.0009295838,0.028201673,0.0050866376,0.0026421114,0.0061977347,0.00022619012],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031544973,0.000003891382,0.000050646115,0.000005559182,5.836847e-7,0.000018853769,0.0018942216,0.000029602987,0.000042364827,0.9916957,0.0046605314,0.0015950078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021067615,0.00002457744,0.0011968319,0.00016490107,0.0000055850783,0.000115031915,0.0076192017,0.0002976004,0.00046974866,0.5314584,0.4586032,0.000023832246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021712076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025146382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97828794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066627148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051438967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048341572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979319784","doi":"10.4000/rccsar.239","title":"The Janus Model of Legal Regulation: Changes in the Political Status of Justice","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RCCS Annual Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Democratization; Rationalization (economics); Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.05014283873728248,"score_gpt":0.36527672161605856,"score_spread":0.3151338828787761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979319784","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11525659,0.009653623,0.14566748,0.05590106,0.0007760451,0.00011051784,0.00010892703,0.0001412844,0.67238444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825196,0.0024147904,0.005955674,0.0016107762,0.00037976744,0.000084816886,0.00001970338,0.000021702263,0.0069931843],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99565303,0.0018331826,0.000113431044,0.00069721846,0.0012889177,0.00041418767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962172,0.0019919667,0.00058260054,0.0004881626,0.0005215305,0.0001984406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047022407,0.0001896816,0.00044622985,0.0020828936,0.0027386684,0.0058950107,0.0009640276,0.0014892841,0.0022601269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060964874,0.00019593028,0.00043349512,0.0012663028,0.021470636,0.0060642147,0.0020391527,0.0026528526,0.00035289384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022684044,0.0000028260652,0.00010086482,0.000007182904,0.000001272291,0.000006089311,0.0002545309,0.00015877269,0.000041253752,0.99748117,0.00023168496,0.0017121518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000810534,0.000015770365,0.00088259217,0.000042419888,0.000005029731,0.0000351056,0.00042341358,0.0014571663,0.00013067355,0.98154044,0.015446613,0.000012672618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027143606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002693722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058950107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003541785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036653448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02569753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980063009","doi":"10.1093/pa/gst009","title":"Activism or Democracy? Judicial Review of Prerogative Powers and Executive Action","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Democracy; Politics; Law; Action (physics); Political science; Parliament; Judicial review; Sociology","score_opus":0.034420464553759154,"score_gpt":0.3157295645846952,"score_spread":0.28130910003093607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980063009","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13615361,0.13278879,0.006571649,0.20294957,0.001948121,0.00016123804,0.00016041457,0.000059101985,0.51920754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95361537,0.01840169,0.0009319214,0.010252911,0.0014215724,0.000041095132,0.00003719646,0.00001856349,0.015279751],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9840804,0.007925584,0.00059158326,0.0011891217,0.0036679786,0.0025453838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93951374,0.039796423,0.006541471,0.0026286724,0.009933552,0.0015861521],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018513462,0.000113414084,0.00045114118,0.002975423,0.003267502,0.0071429545,0.0011895694,0.0023183841,0.00317454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06779404,0.00018289757,0.0001977842,0.0030606408,0.01638096,0.0044418885,0.0012925946,0.002870293,0.0002782781],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037082304,0.00003925111,0.004189084,0.000307238,0.00002533527,0.000102443,0.010104298,0.00024561232,0.00040027354,0.88380826,0.017327238,0.08341381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007141372,0.00017558,0.048267853,0.0026235187,0.00007588392,0.00027134456,0.017923651,0.0005123052,0.0020462163,0.2700632,0.65786284,0.000106137355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09336641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1544266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09336641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010792415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022074718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18564594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980851840","doi":"10.1093/icon/mon038","title":"Roundtable: An exchange with Jeremy Waldron","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.05071779769662236,"score_gpt":0.32312169056542595,"score_spread":0.27240389286880357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980851840","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00051494734,0.008821148,0.00035908958,0.86200505,0.11537868,0.00002269674,0.00007810145,0.00006869422,0.012751652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020076402,0.007948167,0.0009035302,0.7033995,0.07638231,0.00011358955,0.00010576175,0.00039046933,0.1906803],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944981,0.0019930934,0.00026025609,0.00085571303,0.0017721717,0.0006207994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9840725,0.0072787404,0.00059257005,0.00067154027,0.00341632,0.003968329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064326483,0.0007912084,0.0015185117,0.0011937813,0.008782416,0.008282479,0.0016246445,0.008944263,0.02748458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02747957,0.00067368185,0.0006171769,0.0011484283,0.0027292934,0.0075726956,0.0040741097,0.02398388,0.010176059],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013284148,0.00000958978,0.000020304471,0.000012597153,0.0000024741005,0.00008699134,0.00018977493,0.000009231359,0.000048765804,0.0030308503,0.99465466,0.0019214997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009501683,0.000010226203,0.00015733547,0.000085588166,0.00000279236,0.00010475147,0.00079399144,0.000038786216,0.00007026593,0.0014601712,0.9972434,0.000023321467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006193706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0137047265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02748458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004512587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048591807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09194505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981017098","doi":"10.7202/042590ar","title":"Constitutional Patriation as prologue : phase two constitution-making and reform of federal institutions","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Prologue; Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Law; Philosophy; Sociology; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.024027353658438666,"score_gpt":0.3212616249395169,"score_spread":0.2972342712810782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981017098","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3390868,0.0017710708,0.0080541,0.026807312,0.00020563687,0.00030628845,0.00019299086,0.000038704628,0.6235371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97739434,0.00032312243,0.0008919446,0.0006985277,0.000032158146,0.00004935557,0.000025041258,0.0000073091787,0.020578222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99648905,0.0014715631,0.000061987324,0.00019940661,0.00079446414,0.0009835447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99668956,0.0018013091,0.00033162328,0.00035671957,0.0005722733,0.0002484281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004457577,0.0001630427,0.00022168043,0.0009899725,0.0045306743,0.007466362,0.0006644407,0.0019947856,0.0041715535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011107459,0.00015554184,0.0002736439,0.001372891,0.012352047,0.003377349,0.002352699,0.0028537186,0.00019763941],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003248541,0.000020884936,0.00048065328,0.000016194317,0.000002073434,0.000045608722,0.002421829,0.00043408872,0.00017117051,0.9902152,0.0014224211,0.0047374396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022557938,0.00023874994,0.01956114,0.0002393422,0.00003822944,0.00010724931,0.014792158,0.0036019222,0.004865972,0.7166975,0.23957306,0.000059160222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11806715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21844085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9796779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02032209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032413144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23475981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981347521","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1434685","title":"Tracking Inconsistent Judicial Behavior","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Vector Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Tracking (education); Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.018323883134778157,"score_gpt":0.29787158176932466,"score_spread":0.2795476986345465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981347521","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9641832,0.00039558279,0.016026322,0.00089693774,0.000078826975,0.00009557231,0.0024415648,0.00040995932,0.01547205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99163634,0.000068275214,0.005452959,0.00009991296,0.000017655106,0.00005656491,0.00078476267,0.00003893174,0.0018445355],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963117,0.0016542553,0.0002323667,0.0008709668,0.0007185329,0.00021222279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95279986,0.022535697,0.012366751,0.0058861338,0.0054128994,0.000998685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069745732,0.00038616578,0.0006469135,0.003918799,0.0011061823,0.0028044307,0.0010822142,0.001229909,0.003948395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050855283,0.0004154013,0.00020948483,0.0028278104,0.0005260131,0.0018926169,0.0010182739,0.001955196,0.0013481214],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005056488,0.00049838366,0.85045445,0.000084336774,0.00013216058,0.00011935865,0.0011451269,0.005067175,0.0030931819,0.011176533,0.006992545,0.1207312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015155712,0.000628017,0.60837066,0.00020948779,0.0003095167,0.00044513776,0.0030552482,0.31598312,0.011187665,0.04164045,0.017906219,0.00011292044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008214859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014599726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008214859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013593368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015110493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03688556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982177579","doi":"10.1504/ijmbs.2014.068969","title":"The impact of procedural capital and quality counsel in the Canadian refugee determination process","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Migration and Border Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Immigration; Political science; Notice; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.03733388302114962,"score_gpt":0.42196476859087906,"score_spread":0.38463088556972946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982177579","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5626329,0.0023700618,0.006761375,0.07993495,0.00033625026,0.000622147,0.00039071555,0.00013587729,0.3468157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98107016,0.00046354157,0.0015283574,0.00220778,0.000053029133,0.000043664528,0.000045718814,0.000028793109,0.014558924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9474192,0.012788164,0.0015296155,0.003100069,0.020256815,0.014906152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8837819,0.052561104,0.011606107,0.0069526522,0.024715,0.020383189],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0324029,0.00032640187,0.0005972474,0.0034749168,0.030999025,0.018775182,0.0043456196,0.0048231096,0.01175701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15015246,0.0007016764,0.00070683623,0.003672394,0.020478362,0.004371884,0.008751442,0.0064847176,0.0006360903],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005431995,0.00052015577,0.11493361,0.00020272812,0.000108078966,0.0015162978,0.083189614,0.0031463562,0.00091573916,0.64535683,0.023784881,0.12578267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003292621,0.00038987983,0.36738804,0.0013019192,0.00041886079,0.000989752,0.16693975,0.010666283,0.0026542891,0.12433098,0.32397717,0.0006137287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96073306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97605056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17666648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17666648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28388643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95495015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983575886","doi":"10.1177/0539018404042581","title":"Compromise and Public Debate in Processes of Constitutional Reform: the Canadian Case","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Information","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Ratification; Compromise; Negotiation; Law and economics; Political science; Outcome (game theory); Law; Economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.031465269363169054,"score_gpt":0.28948810526408314,"score_spread":0.25802283590091407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983575886","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16594699,0.0041883667,0.0069647226,0.09748443,0.0003437675,0.00031008152,0.00016095195,0.00008596606,0.7245147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96168894,0.0009797894,0.0018136626,0.0044321227,0.00010690093,0.00012676146,0.000035422472,0.000026624164,0.030789835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96639574,0.008529903,0.000597293,0.0022560183,0.010627442,0.011593584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875459,0.006443038,0.0006609012,0.0009633082,0.0029192853,0.0014674863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020248469,0.0007129598,0.000987741,0.0029247997,0.06678,0.018702643,0.0041591222,0.017975744,0.0078018936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039846227,0.0006868159,0.0010786832,0.006133085,0.040667582,0.009743302,0.00960987,0.011610526,0.0005904326],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003861166,0.000023601911,0.0006152237,0.000023805429,0.00000748926,0.000468075,0.012684858,0.00085375324,0.00015340676,0.9775933,0.0038353992,0.0037025365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046104693,0.000112134556,0.006311438,0.0003790559,0.00014733415,0.00049069343,0.052259706,0.007565836,0.0013408755,0.50849926,0.4221092,0.000323305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9666591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97239053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79100066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20899934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1710662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91744864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984457982","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2008832","title":"Senses of Sen: Reflections on Amartya Sen’s Ideas of Justice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0373418907034442,"score_gpt":0.35116044628230114,"score_spread":0.31381855557885696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984457982","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01768662,0.0086409,0.004408969,0.5635019,0.003044422,0.000024720684,0.00007060552,0.00003333703,0.40258855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.802424,0.0035280616,0.0012352447,0.14434291,0.0024040425,0.00014671938,0.000024124125,0.00021397806,0.0456809],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874737,0.00794075,0.00036914556,0.0010193029,0.0012071884,0.001989837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9839124,0.013097835,0.00050064153,0.0006979315,0.0011009142,0.0006903522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012285293,0.00072263664,0.0015232807,0.0018160733,0.025175039,0.021359043,0.0029360375,0.02203919,0.009448889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022859557,0.00083118916,0.0009837993,0.002617386,0.07161957,0.026091542,0.013048991,0.041510493,0.0010980839],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069611447,0.000005728583,0.00004307605,0.000013233965,0.000005124907,0.000074557116,0.013849654,0.000023087972,0.000018839793,0.9729723,0.012281716,0.00070581114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017266968,0.000009550924,0.00021804265,0.00021747901,0.000012501441,0.00018815282,0.023703588,0.000107840366,0.00018445257,0.76245487,0.21284021,0.00004602391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012845432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023523144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025175039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008977873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068393387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06513935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985150001","doi":"10.7202/1026929ar","title":"La portée élargie de la procédure bilatérale de modification de la Constitution du Canada","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Constitution; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.011869946902618637,"score_gpt":0.2484286990955924,"score_spread":0.23655875219297376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985150001","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15829651,0.0037239233,0.017372083,0.04305932,0.0008613462,0.00028659904,0.00044799983,0.0001821215,0.7757701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88923705,0.0012873807,0.0045902426,0.0055686124,0.000109710105,0.000116608295,0.000090493544,0.000044302167,0.0989555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902749,0.0018343029,0.00023436236,0.0010693141,0.003851211,0.0027358888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995207,0.0015207246,0.00026198087,0.00064791844,0.0019733105,0.0003890811],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045446036,0.00028052027,0.00035586787,0.0010278118,0.011592695,0.0063395193,0.0012089965,0.0030122288,0.007465002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011191721,0.00027974253,0.0005605571,0.0013078606,0.011049284,0.0016197901,0.0034835716,0.0049513327,0.00042836848],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020984578,0.000012850783,0.0015931268,0.000046002955,0.000013907841,0.00013355876,0.0067346706,0.00036910747,0.0008145887,0.9675396,0.008250531,0.014471104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000071313756,0.000120351564,0.028781343,0.00051567715,0.0001273101,0.00031373388,0.010974356,0.0015892384,0.004492824,0.083514914,0.86930466,0.00019439241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8440581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9150479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1559419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040417977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08702895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31372052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987123712","doi":"10.1080/713649335","title":"The 'Haves' and the 'Have Nots': An Empirical Study of the Rational Actor and Party Capability Hypotheses in the High Court 1948–99","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Political science; Power (physics); Constitution; Politics; Law; Law and economics; High Court; Test (biology); Sociology","score_opus":0.06880131897825816,"score_gpt":0.3732283465553949,"score_spread":0.30442702757713674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987123712","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98835343,0.00010617932,0.00013021937,0.00082442106,0.000010292289,0.000012327423,0.000022215807,6.3142977e-7,0.010540353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995034,0.00002630076,0.00001585028,0.00004001146,0.000006056835,0.0000041759426,0.000009330287,7.8816885e-7,0.00039415548],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957552,0.0020825216,0.00022670357,0.00038325303,0.0007619098,0.00079035916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93474406,0.044171393,0.013190648,0.0015647991,0.002886644,0.0034424812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010936369,0.00012243011,0.00044819148,0.0022610615,0.0053189015,0.0046998933,0.0013015444,0.0015899802,0.0075615947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041891046,0.00029204838,0.00021191202,0.0021560304,0.011026688,0.0051990543,0.0031299163,0.0037462693,0.00033522613],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048469473,0.0010275926,0.4706976,0.000118860175,0.00010637439,0.001669671,0.34137818,0.0008552287,0.0008573682,0.1589912,0.0026786653,0.021134587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043578348,0.00027194447,0.60676366,0.00019541453,0.00004224548,0.00036778688,0.3606674,0.0017796251,0.00036898063,0.016070647,0.013366837,0.00006183073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022364046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029025462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022364046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029698957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014434039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057837725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987266328","doi":"10.1080/09644000802300718","title":"Legislative Politics in Germany: Some Lessons and Challenges","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Politics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Federalist; Politics; Public administration; Political science; German; Federalism; Constitution; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.10271203329397266,"score_gpt":0.34439507551101434,"score_spread":0.24168304221704168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987266328","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1127679,0.24469171,0.0032374768,0.49620655,0.0016542731,0.000020823272,0.00026561142,0.00008205628,0.14107355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89340305,0.07017332,0.0013465425,0.023280002,0.0016135335,0.0000368359,0.0001325069,0.00004323284,0.009970889],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954065,0.0023884284,0.00016980687,0.0003566134,0.0006567076,0.0010220332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972235,0.0018275753,0.00030451422,0.00014569887,0.00024618628,0.00025254124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008204158,0.0003246543,0.00063606905,0.003469515,0.0027479017,0.011291742,0.0013345985,0.00466712,0.0028348956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054224515,0.00033110403,0.00036201446,0.0049011176,0.00889872,0.008216767,0.0028004397,0.002481625,0.00043560087],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020245401,0.00002485676,0.0014015391,0.00024748416,0.000018499937,0.00023848625,0.004847712,0.0006332619,0.00010793476,0.9463044,0.012628338,0.03352737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002869254,0.000063802996,0.023495227,0.0016207903,0.00004262576,0.00044551378,0.036005218,0.0015243038,0.00052269455,0.41111425,0.5250335,0.00010334276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026188955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041855775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026188955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011419593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005572884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082855344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987300884","doi":"10.1017/s0008423902778451","title":"Repeat Litigators and Agenda Setting on the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Politics; Affect (linguistics); Law; Inequality; Sociology","score_opus":0.034004457079714674,"score_gpt":0.26041840384695597,"score_spread":0.2264139467672413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987300884","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9021229,0.0007340623,0.00029159145,0.009359811,0.00003944286,0.000047385445,0.00032323884,0.000019218001,0.08706233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957997,0.00015717934,0.00006418178,0.00032109444,0.000011437947,0.0000050085523,0.000058325433,0.000005146811,0.0035778224],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936242,0.0006416775,0.000091968664,0.00048900006,0.0016883895,0.0034648338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986405,0.0041094813,0.0015058524,0.0003490838,0.003984239,0.0036463966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035200685,0.00019304577,0.00059675664,0.002027308,0.016649872,0.0067526354,0.0013487276,0.0019139205,0.008691575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022411857,0.00024279194,0.00036622086,0.0022450534,0.004229902,0.0011574455,0.0027508945,0.0022975535,0.0003693269],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061813457,0.00036457318,0.44718125,0.00015327097,0.0002832467,0.0025927231,0.0453234,0.0093175545,0.002451426,0.36060858,0.05335995,0.077745855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020424018,0.00015760498,0.793337,0.00030140387,0.0003199026,0.00030446096,0.048677336,0.010038134,0.0016754875,0.043925986,0.10077145,0.00028689153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98508644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9949698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09745833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09745833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11169825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.707113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987710354","doi":"10.1111/1540-6237.8403013","title":"Acclimation Effects on the Supreme Court of Canada: A Cross‐Cultural Examination of Judicial Folklore<sup>*</sup>","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Majority opinion; Supreme Court Decisions; Voting; Context (archaeology); Concurring opinion; Economic Justice; Precedent; Politics; Generalizability theory; Judicial opinion; Political science; Original jurisdiction; Certiorari; Sociology; Psychology; History","score_opus":0.020683654517647698,"score_gpt":0.2891717526265526,"score_spread":0.2684880981089049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987710354","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940064,0.00020986274,0.000070325455,0.0004783385,0.00001580559,0.000015332473,0.00014044924,0.0000042179017,0.005059313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989256,0.00010025884,0.000046846737,0.000084067666,0.0000033496733,0.000004200791,0.0000827584,0.000005232238,0.0007477497],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99581677,0.0006980204,0.0001314982,0.0005997046,0.0019350406,0.0008190188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98212516,0.0041654753,0.002809135,0.00097284355,0.007893583,0.0020338364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034167857,0.0001804685,0.0003597332,0.0016559726,0.009008531,0.0024553419,0.0011902506,0.00047163587,0.004233585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01930642,0.00022942969,0.00033001488,0.0028105315,0.0038852072,0.00081909023,0.0018338629,0.0011313069,0.00018888371],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030290734,0.00021017868,0.7518571,0.000085254425,0.0001739429,0.0005085798,0.17665668,0.0005407534,0.0022657544,0.0043342533,0.00586153,0.057203066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061626224,0.000035765763,0.9661189,0.00003328929,0.000016891987,0.000048672802,0.028563237,0.00020490238,0.0002852919,0.00017555771,0.004482307,0.000029032275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97838116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99265504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040352292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040352292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032441314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29277772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988391450","doi":"10.7202/042366ar","title":"La Cour suprême et l'amendement constitutionnel","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Parliament; Constitution; Political science; Legislature; Power (physics); Politics","score_opus":0.0157224971836052,"score_gpt":0.2792609643681974,"score_spread":0.26353846718459223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988391450","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036869906,0.041239996,0.007388324,0.081513554,0.0025484576,0.000059705526,0.00026018085,0.00017729482,0.8299426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71450627,0.008469529,0.0033191137,0.008107032,0.0011276627,0.0001099919,0.00008673173,0.00008983786,0.26418382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99239093,0.0024121616,0.00016957374,0.0007551536,0.0028545605,0.0014176696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99728453,0.0016188904,0.00020018281,0.0002399755,0.0004908819,0.00016555002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047738105,0.00050208037,0.00058933353,0.0012229274,0.009241696,0.016478343,0.0008956899,0.0057842648,0.0063539627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009483392,0.00045661067,0.0005808782,0.00146371,0.015940389,0.0032981592,0.002009662,0.010547104,0.0008352808],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007671477,0.000004201682,0.000096711155,0.000009851837,0.0000034684597,0.000063027794,0.0011531807,0.00008586268,0.000120448436,0.99006885,0.0047620134,0.0036246479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039233273,0.000022835993,0.0020310418,0.00015238457,0.000014716661,0.00012620626,0.0014977076,0.00033865465,0.00065110985,0.13198438,0.86309814,0.000043594173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4463945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46462098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4463945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023453165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017785903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8875924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988525678","doi":"10.7202/1013031ar","title":"Israel as a Mixed Jurisdiction","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Israeli law; Common law; Supreme court; Comparative law; Civil law (Civil law); Public law; Constitutional law; Municipal law; Precedent; Chinese law","score_opus":0.03365458820360218,"score_gpt":0.3052021177948547,"score_spread":0.2715475295912525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988525678","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06129048,0.0014067921,0.0049841683,0.0071810535,0.0001570921,0.00005428694,0.00012358378,0.000047909885,0.9247547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9084729,0.00067494065,0.0019695472,0.004698294,0.00015875399,0.000066976994,0.000112773414,0.000031435822,0.08381432],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984357,0.00041884542,0.000042760155,0.0002790406,0.0004179271,0.00040577407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996327,0.00009176293,0.000029550489,0.000039958024,0.000098817014,0.00010726169],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014632313,0.00022266927,0.00025904633,0.0008311717,0.0048499964,0.0066301967,0.0007616575,0.0014492003,0.015304515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010896729,0.0001974198,0.00022910771,0.00060724746,0.0065081962,0.002850487,0.0051076026,0.0021019212,0.0019590177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074416535,0.000009965956,0.000449907,0.000007493206,0.0000057976604,0.00015977694,0.0013061127,0.00008156126,0.00013740493,0.98706853,0.0046412833,0.0061245845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005497818,0.000037570608,0.0017387307,0.00010776172,0.000025389321,0.00075554906,0.004517048,0.001324695,0.00045495763,0.39893827,0.59200746,0.000037631497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010919592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01117733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015304515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003967547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028761278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05119866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990133451","doi":"10.1215/03616878-27-2-213","title":"Courts and Health Policy: Judicial Policy Making and Publicly Funded Health Care in Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Politics; Public administration; Political science; Health care; Health policy; Public policy; Law","score_opus":0.06819827422469975,"score_gpt":0.39528609164275713,"score_spread":0.32708781741805737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990133451","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25195295,0.034073498,0.0023360876,0.48280063,0.0010161839,0.0002286454,0.0010741919,0.000097497985,0.22642031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95740116,0.006620724,0.001016771,0.0129488185,0.00022180646,0.000055588538,0.00014499802,0.000029144607,0.021561079],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97754604,0.0038857954,0.0006590724,0.0010539126,0.006412859,0.0104422625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9686715,0.014362968,0.002255391,0.0006003735,0.008074505,0.0060354173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011521679,0.00031694627,0.0007013993,0.003467422,0.030088147,0.018164515,0.0037157938,0.008484132,0.007444937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049067806,0.00077450223,0.0005766389,0.006565114,0.016380692,0.0032133197,0.004858236,0.008559427,0.0002830272],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008092664,0.00008066282,0.012671983,0.00023474029,0.00005923996,0.00058128266,0.012243397,0.0044951616,0.00025697937,0.884289,0.051166307,0.03384037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036286155,0.00010938995,0.1767449,0.0021570418,0.00033211312,0.00032289248,0.04550859,0.01609614,0.0012798993,0.21402797,0.54233104,0.0007271687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99572915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6907591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.30924088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4892419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8011827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990924378","doi":"","title":"The Reasonable Justice: An Empirical Analysis of Justice Frank Iacobucci's Career on the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Economic Justice; Voting; Political science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.023851754726525006,"score_gpt":0.30757953544384065,"score_spread":0.28372778071731564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990924378","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96228456,0.0014315854,0.00013629983,0.0062460243,0.00007495522,0.00012279584,0.0009189623,0.000009300129,0.028775627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991521,0.00069571455,0.0000824685,0.0006847042,0.000028781136,0.000032411295,0.00046213213,0.000017380775,0.0064754444],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98818225,0.0017423795,0.0003015575,0.0011621858,0.0040080175,0.004603617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9500878,0.014354914,0.0067216414,0.0009888853,0.016903734,0.010943161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00594839,0.0003750941,0.0010886141,0.006800749,0.030827172,0.010204743,0.004794036,0.0029784562,0.009155389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04536625,0.0004922053,0.00045679786,0.01377021,0.010132531,0.0034092015,0.0056837937,0.0058671297,0.00071485795],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026222345,0.0007371248,0.61448437,0.00020069114,0.00008839177,0.0010652067,0.30156314,0.0005091774,0.00024657315,0.02862908,0.02893361,0.023280438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023106004,0.0000710218,0.53144306,0.0004362689,0.00004094878,0.00012709528,0.43722257,0.0010170153,0.00010382805,0.0010735135,0.02835705,0.00008456793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9922827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99710137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8971292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10287084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11165353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74638367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991144808","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2005.0029","title":"John Willis and the Challenges for Public Law Scholarship in a Neoliberal Globalizing World","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Law; State (computer science); Sociology; Neoliberalism (international relations); Accountability; Political science; Democracy; Corporate governance; Globalization; Context (archaeology); Politics; History; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.043644719354182224,"score_gpt":0.26449566462811497,"score_spread":0.22085094527393273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991144808","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006658181,0.045512244,0.00072651665,0.87695605,0.006395265,0.000016190601,0.000030965246,0.000053898508,0.06365061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5595694,0.067500375,0.0033903103,0.20195237,0.025071124,0.00013526586,0.00007667592,0.00020944173,0.14209504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99591917,0.0017951896,0.00010689604,0.00043333299,0.0012743969,0.00047108665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99068564,0.0061037187,0.00038142694,0.00033835814,0.0011382832,0.0013525777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050092596,0.0003293784,0.0005098371,0.0025769423,0.012569055,0.01550956,0.0012497779,0.0073326738,0.0065144734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010826142,0.0003728628,0.00026741985,0.0029551126,0.03157923,0.01085026,0.0057613114,0.007588099,0.0007820175],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007161807,0.00002301121,0.00021011807,0.000065999026,0.0000023203138,0.000103090155,0.0065909433,0.00010732783,0.00004372482,0.79618466,0.18915461,0.007507074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044564986,0.0000060695193,0.00029979428,0.0004011893,0.0000025368377,0.00007732382,0.0077500446,0.00018338914,0.000065282744,0.23474987,0.7564422,0.000017726548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034596194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037476286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034596194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017317127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016482733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12564516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993806464","doi":"10.7202/042514ar","title":"Quelques notes sur les articles 1, 2, 7 et 15 de la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of expression; Political science; Charter; Humanities; Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Human rights; Linguistics","score_opus":0.016416517404488875,"score_gpt":0.2643255200570426,"score_spread":0.2479090026525537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993806464","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062746075,0.031973936,0.008402152,0.27550143,0.018302271,0.00017504417,0.0017193949,0.00017531481,0.6574758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20240368,0.026503468,0.008123344,0.17041518,0.009433844,0.00044749648,0.0011341328,0.00039078336,0.5811481],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898664,0.0016709315,0.00025755292,0.00072355784,0.005697713,0.0017838241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915138,0.004165828,0.00063611893,0.00031171835,0.0029774103,0.00039520353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005053483,0.0008625778,0.0006965821,0.0027306683,0.012345004,0.010922976,0.00248387,0.0075682173,0.02234296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013254142,0.000559907,0.00081221457,0.0057028215,0.019869817,0.004136242,0.0015799257,0.01142277,0.002430321],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001411401,0.000012159125,0.00013255377,0.0000749677,0.00000442494,0.00007851049,0.0038432525,0.00007930863,0.00013707824,0.7925663,0.19775683,0.00530053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010261826,0.0000094904835,0.0015949925,0.00025776916,0.000007285174,0.000053137395,0.0027628946,0.00007961864,0.00029858376,0.04889334,0.9459875,0.000045126464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.77638566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8749528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22361434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033839945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035507556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44986248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994050578","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2007.0025","title":"'This New Democracy.. . ': Justice Iacobucci and Canada's Rights Revolution","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Adjudication; Law; Democracy; Supreme court; Constitutionalism; Economic Justice; Political science; Dissenting opinion; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.009781214823715448,"score_gpt":0.22387862478239262,"score_spread":0.21409740995867718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994050578","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012426123,0.027618686,0.00085084577,0.79795605,0.003021053,0.000037115224,0.00020698408,0.000057651207,0.15782548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5882445,0.016067024,0.0015030424,0.24791265,0.002256447,0.000059969374,0.00018149691,0.00015614247,0.1436187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917725,0.0012092541,0.00008008273,0.00079531287,0.0027003593,0.0034425196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955069,0.0009741984,0.00021191346,0.00018142298,0.0015316173,0.0015939245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037136816,0.00049835275,0.00046029096,0.0013975126,0.02813327,0.014633873,0.00201741,0.008719867,0.0073487195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009183831,0.0003186906,0.00029962632,0.0018696373,0.024818499,0.0037549054,0.0035625717,0.010701055,0.0006329209],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001955694,0.000015883872,0.0009118832,0.000044906017,0.000006536663,0.00016250882,0.007508533,0.0002080725,0.000105711915,0.53982955,0.432546,0.018640896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000151347995,0.000007061673,0.0031409813,0.00032735846,0.0000088055,0.00007118135,0.008707053,0.0003375891,0.00016287947,0.061279487,0.92587686,0.00006565361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9751865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9845329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14082952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14082952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17712745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995286705","doi":"10.3138/utlj.0425","title":"Republicanism and the division of powers in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Argument (complex analysis); Scholarship; Normative; Law and economics; Norm (philosophy); Political science; Politics; Multinational corporation; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Law; Constitution; Lawmaking; Legislature","score_opus":0.005666595961203131,"score_gpt":0.19097371737783328,"score_spread":0.18530712141663014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995286705","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5228862,0.0033247569,0.0011377448,0.02866519,0.00016263136,0.00008526025,0.0005387326,0.000052284122,0.44314715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9704399,0.00065496535,0.0003326883,0.000943509,0.000012828135,0.000011150093,0.000081855236,0.000013047831,0.027510036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969081,0.00021347754,0.000055469456,0.0003193356,0.00076279853,0.0017407362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99701416,0.00044113223,0.00021737674,0.00012251113,0.0012262997,0.0009785141],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013298247,0.00016530375,0.00044047902,0.0012459565,0.026150402,0.0059373616,0.0014153017,0.0013550151,0.007956656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056396513,0.0002900989,0.00030563318,0.0028844266,0.008337415,0.0013947258,0.00340076,0.0029445102,0.00025621863],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008268049,0.000034311164,0.016057009,0.00006326131,0.000028631248,0.000412525,0.017226968,0.001130236,0.00037662734,0.9205855,0.020296179,0.023705998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017077335,0.00007894405,0.19961531,0.00037563065,0.00015690814,0.00043440252,0.060800456,0.007937645,0.0015000543,0.15135574,0.57727915,0.0002949457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9967373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.829568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17043194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1785222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9621814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996965981","doi":"10.1080/13572334.2013.812356","title":"Legislative Dissent without Reprisal? An Alternative View of Speaker Selection","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Legislature; Opposition (politics); Popularity; Political science; Legislative intent; Selection (genetic algorithm); Public relations; Law; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07743213812032024,"score_gpt":0.3914000847078785,"score_spread":0.3139679465875583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996965981","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13588314,0.0015912734,0.08166571,0.04874389,0.0008346236,0.00024239483,0.000115909555,0.00012470529,0.73079836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9597682,0.00034216282,0.0060011907,0.003944071,0.0009094361,0.00017314304,0.000036118523,0.000042922664,0.028782664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98394805,0.007997186,0.00036160205,0.0022959774,0.0037981377,0.0015990032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99133646,0.0048938747,0.0011798597,0.00088850484,0.0011629399,0.0005382513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010194086,0.0005776051,0.0005754777,0.0023326878,0.0039576474,0.0053742705,0.001918631,0.0032938605,0.014311258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016631505,0.00024751094,0.0008711618,0.0013152012,0.016163835,0.00545834,0.0030936836,0.0032136603,0.0015697342],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083000596,0.00006617498,0.003463618,0.00006870512,0.000027820337,0.00022482601,0.012854507,0.0005077295,0.00065325754,0.9620842,0.0019710094,0.017995201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015689679,0.00026149178,0.011844128,0.00018577819,0.00007231269,0.00082125055,0.014647923,0.0058026747,0.0013066356,0.8719233,0.09290277,0.00007480527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034179515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030310682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014311258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029951802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003138353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053912103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997683147","doi":"10.1080/10361140802654968","title":"Legislative Versus Judicial Checks and Balances: Comparing Rights Policies Across Regimes","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Judicial review; Commonwealth; Legislature; Supreme court; Constitutionalism; Separation of powers; Constitution; Constitutional law; Veto; Voting; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.07891367019939949,"score_gpt":0.40039293907041656,"score_spread":0.3214792688710171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997683147","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9219143,0.001471171,0.00363981,0.0013676801,0.000054624154,0.00015344331,0.00042376915,0.000022510665,0.07095269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978249,0.00019811041,0.00051193335,0.00015784921,0.000023392082,0.00006647269,0.00012669408,0.000008313695,0.0010823581],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97233003,0.015478046,0.0009887007,0.001952932,0.006346028,0.0029043318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9107095,0.06015969,0.017495861,0.004568996,0.005695732,0.0013701328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02150614,0.00021047045,0.00066663086,0.0029447917,0.0018445889,0.005312661,0.0014680582,0.0015495288,0.0062287347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.088816136,0.0002193544,0.0006220218,0.0031990784,0.007983065,0.0039328043,0.0028691085,0.0020862254,0.00043348208],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037969325,0.0012149963,0.32181844,0.0007900178,0.0016207106,0.00024449697,0.017074738,0.01941253,0.0057225097,0.5318332,0.0045245294,0.091946915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048829406,0.0023444933,0.7668854,0.0007740936,0.0012537219,0.000081925886,0.023086242,0.019238468,0.007186499,0.14526395,0.033227783,0.00016911079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027040102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022050848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027040102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059594666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00329266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11373675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001427335","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.23.2.627","title":"Do Women Refugee Judges Really Make a Difference? An Empirical Analysis of Gender and Outcomes in Canadian Refugee Determinations","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Political science; Humanities; Palestinian refugees; Ethnology; Sociology; Art; Law","score_opus":0.06603884986615195,"score_gpt":0.3096297230078696,"score_spread":0.24359087314171768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001427335","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9880554,0.00046540616,0.000086550834,0.0009407548,0.000027749236,0.000035055044,0.00020319373,0.0000027505928,0.010183084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99673456,0.00030982445,0.000059624646,0.00015624914,0.000008077032,0.00001493358,0.00010154883,0.0000042204288,0.0026110008],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950411,0.0009869887,0.00014007885,0.00040867308,0.0015378746,0.0018853507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894986,0.0024830091,0.0029053509,0.0003699496,0.002743661,0.001999302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051118084,0.0002848738,0.000498366,0.001891213,0.00824466,0.0030555557,0.0010668229,0.0006956573,0.004751277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024518194,0.00026989414,0.00030768674,0.0032875282,0.0052893083,0.0010150863,0.0027573733,0.0014358617,0.0003875162],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027102797,0.000131295,0.7951334,0.00011127814,0.000043279404,0.0005130795,0.17009018,0.00010517602,0.00038717402,0.0046630227,0.004185832,0.02436527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000095824425,0.00004403176,0.8174431,0.0001232802,0.000019601854,0.00006331262,0.17234136,0.00011401957,0.0001484429,0.00037092448,0.009290249,0.000031994554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9277367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9684221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0722633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018878244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023292862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1453777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001503077","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2005","title":"Authority, justice, and public law: A unified theory","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Economic Justice; Duty; Political science; Public law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.020331275350106637,"score_gpt":0.24490026477474316,"score_spread":0.22456898942463652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001503077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024673773,0.03414356,0.13933091,0.12516959,0.0010215229,0.00020085218,0.00024247925,0.0001985281,0.6750188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9238598,0.014077092,0.028250294,0.007180644,0.002184689,0.00048338808,0.00014731323,0.000109792054,0.023707073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945253,0.002427798,0.00018896219,0.0006036793,0.0015644981,0.0006898161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962387,0.0023066907,0.00028185477,0.00031994423,0.00047485565,0.00037801897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058508758,0.00089793076,0.0013819924,0.006721197,0.007288646,0.018204866,0.0027388665,0.008729397,0.0052484996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00517459,0.00072859216,0.0016748713,0.0037010498,0.043778986,0.026080996,0.0066755046,0.0072735636,0.00071347336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.1786627e-7,0.0000042623024,0.00001497353,0.0000060731204,7.533714e-7,0.0000053459466,0.00016199274,0.00014242098,0.000002992559,0.99883884,0.0002529882,0.000568699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008253414,0.000005039282,0.000049880477,0.00005957467,0.0000041305993,0.000009574347,0.00024816673,0.0008627582,0.000012164648,0.9912089,0.0075263493,0.0000051200936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011682021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007895185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018204866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015249724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011620051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.110644996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002133661","doi":"10.2202/1943-3867.1116","title":"The Pathology of Judicialization: Politics, Corruption and the Courts in Nigeria","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Law and Development Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Adjudication; Popularity; Intervention (counseling); Language change; Political science; SWORD; Power (physics); Law and economics; Law; Political economy; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.0491364021647457,"score_gpt":0.2964268825232813,"score_spread":0.24729048035853562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002133661","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5994737,0.11130498,0.0031056744,0.069367215,0.00063010777,0.00006782795,0.00003403679,0.000010917871,0.21600553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806773,0.014684059,0.00025073774,0.0013270719,0.00013829843,0.000013009237,0.0000051800494,0.0000033051201,0.0029010097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970573,0.0018983547,0.00015380741,0.00015821907,0.0003634786,0.00036887475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911028,0.00631749,0.0015391073,0.00015366625,0.0006651151,0.00022189137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044831187,0.00012570784,0.00023701211,0.001743568,0.0048484067,0.007256032,0.00038903544,0.0021005094,0.0012639939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007902273,0.00021909355,0.00012373285,0.0018656151,0.0127080055,0.0030945248,0.0015979207,0.0026508714,0.00011955467],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025233036,0.00004627237,0.009392097,0.00025839536,0.000007629784,0.001091716,0.022530587,0.00050385855,0.00045348072,0.94000643,0.002783973,0.022900347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005643094,0.0002441727,0.097058244,0.005309001,0.00009005281,0.0031063778,0.13723202,0.0029396487,0.0033668014,0.46202958,0.2884207,0.00014704104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00869248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018593227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00869248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036826006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005536472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026719272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002183418","doi":"10.1111/1467-9760.00124","title":"Constitutionalizing the Right to Secede","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.04843481092712054,"score_gpt":0.33612678477356833,"score_spread":0.2876919738464478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002183418","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047778137,0.002386468,0.02967737,0.0885353,0.0015314438,0.0001304786,0.00033054414,0.00011853095,0.82951176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94782186,0.0007807733,0.0059126173,0.015448303,0.0014272929,0.00023498376,0.00010551312,0.000096573436,0.028172115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98040605,0.006882017,0.0013557841,0.003705914,0.0039923517,0.0036578502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9778978,0.01452496,0.0009910779,0.0039760834,0.0018857392,0.0007242947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023123486,0.00060044794,0.0015199974,0.0018681331,0.008141726,0.011472917,0.0029750299,0.019951778,0.00952886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0382914,0.0012337533,0.0011398302,0.0013057075,0.0427915,0.011659801,0.0058233542,0.022303175,0.001540804],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005947543,0.000007147234,0.000033079566,0.0000064582014,0.000003771813,0.000010789296,0.00023893526,0.00006458549,0.00006761792,0.99784935,0.0010426489,0.0006696799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025455132,0.000009294594,0.000121740086,0.00003585609,0.000014378406,0.00002101931,0.00016730279,0.0001633152,0.00020076774,0.98583543,0.013392873,0.000012473616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00981673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011819702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023123486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047720326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010485919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.122290134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003032745","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12342029","title":"Emerging Trends and the General Framework for the Exercise of Sentencing Discretion in Botswana","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Legislation; Judicial discretion; Legislature; Political science; Law; Prerogative; Parliament; Sentencing guidelines; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Judicial review","score_opus":0.02759292219951517,"score_gpt":0.33225649349887604,"score_spread":0.3046635712993609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003032745","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6884026,0.0065812515,0.02848561,0.046722297,0.0001449786,0.0001957763,0.0004965491,0.00007023623,0.22890079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99487334,0.00035811283,0.0021524455,0.00035556155,0.000017490307,0.000034422053,0.00003137621,0.0000066361977,0.0021706272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950328,0.0020178796,0.00021014277,0.00092042674,0.00059652835,0.0012221585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995233,0.0023136986,0.0008357555,0.00038410592,0.0008578613,0.00037557937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005894725,0.0002453386,0.00034709935,0.004316702,0.004460399,0.008428469,0.001689931,0.0023121235,0.003977023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072097573,0.00040240906,0.00040962934,0.003262288,0.0128109995,0.003482173,0.0026117568,0.0031272066,0.00022967154],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016570184,0.000019138159,0.0041491296,0.00005538285,0.000008877133,0.00041612872,0.009077769,0.0008491596,0.0007456317,0.9775997,0.0004783135,0.006584251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048171856,0.000096420976,0.06425482,0.0008464303,0.000028392518,0.00063220225,0.02906222,0.008631177,0.0006049205,0.82626605,0.06942016,0.00010905732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.068955086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.101085916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.068955086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021745052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007709989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15777218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003292738","doi":"10.2307/3552335","title":"Judicial Power and Canadian Democracy","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Power (physics); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Politics; Physics","score_opus":0.03029203612258365,"score_gpt":0.26528863370429745,"score_spread":0.2349965975817138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003292738","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023429792,0.014371769,0.0006399705,0.16485697,0.0012801077,0.000041287793,0.00083766296,0.000083146406,0.7944593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62975794,0.015492788,0.0011806416,0.034793936,0.0007906737,0.00004764013,0.00061453826,0.00011719613,0.31720477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933252,0.0005155453,0.000102833204,0.00073292834,0.0028368975,0.0024866124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945005,0.0007254991,0.00023407844,0.00022741337,0.0030584487,0.0012541264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00241067,0.0003873509,0.00045504342,0.0035938655,0.022030517,0.008821501,0.0016284061,0.003045474,0.025813231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010963868,0.00041765702,0.00048240164,0.005258397,0.009683349,0.0024728936,0.0032972107,0.0051173694,0.0016093624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030206002,0.000010713691,0.0019727747,0.00007649224,0.000010713262,0.00016136197,0.0036400433,0.00024456606,0.00013764309,0.78658664,0.17897065,0.028158212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004274991,0.000010731507,0.01005794,0.00018173642,0.000022051776,0.00009673152,0.0029250602,0.0003357369,0.00017790649,0.0421325,0.9439673,0.000049558097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9847971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99239904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85292566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14707436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13832034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98927283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003394347","doi":"10.1017/s0008423900000160","title":"Reconsidering the Constitution, Minorities and Politics in Canada","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Federalism; Politics; Political science; Regionalism (politics); Dualism; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Democracy; Philosophy","score_opus":0.051832422210160996,"score_gpt":0.2573608100943222,"score_spread":0.20552838788416122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003394347","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4056818,0.015350562,0.0009320096,0.177742,0.00075226725,0.00009642537,0.00063508516,0.000044057,0.3987658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9650543,0.0030294794,0.0005875463,0.007245686,0.00008599362,0.000018315595,0.00010255797,0.00002618324,0.023849972],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99501365,0.0005215251,0.000100275625,0.00034011062,0.0013301051,0.0026943276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954679,0.001190546,0.00022751586,0.000131787,0.0014905573,0.001491688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031346867,0.00021778184,0.0005511033,0.0023074357,0.03787066,0.011923215,0.0021221754,0.0035331019,0.007084649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074369,0.00031461188,0.0004040876,0.0046689636,0.013053181,0.0026059947,0.00452079,0.005230816,0.00023561115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000766209,0.00003303939,0.01410355,0.000101387195,0.000030082132,0.00066332467,0.041394673,0.0011771421,0.0004638421,0.8826922,0.03267176,0.026592324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010291247,0.00004302129,0.06329654,0.0005578686,0.0001547484,0.00024320558,0.12991767,0.0032680742,0.00089143286,0.10935822,0.69190955,0.00025686136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99817073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9993486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2552217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2552217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.33210602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86383724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003674295","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.1.39","title":"FEDERAL JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS: A LOOK AT PATRONAGE IN FEDERAL APPOINTMENTS SINCE 1988","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Political science; Politics; Supreme court; Law; Judicial independence; Government (linguistics); Independence (probability theory); Power (physics); Judicial review; Corporate governance; Public administration; Business","score_opus":0.01858306994758652,"score_gpt":0.2362304961876446,"score_spread":0.2176474262400581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003674295","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9753372,0.0013803899,0.00032216663,0.0043461006,0.000059446793,0.000016798549,0.00016910689,0.000014748504,0.01835413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948324,0.0002784016,0.000068070694,0.0002198227,0.00006183773,0.0000075861867,0.00006355618,0.0000053704052,0.0044629616],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946866,0.0010806577,0.00021740829,0.00039849503,0.0008637845,0.002753056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866807,0.00374356,0.004934586,0.00037617312,0.0014457962,0.0028192329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003988073,0.00007638217,0.00028128753,0.0027596662,0.0052998383,0.002129517,0.000981819,0.0012700212,0.0059776893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016344797,0.00021251541,0.0002386377,0.0036340798,0.0020775036,0.0012754258,0.0017127506,0.0018666622,0.0004989145],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034757066,0.0002899819,0.66293234,0.00017667,0.000036546408,0.0017838214,0.1691641,0.00055990176,0.0015622023,0.045562956,0.012202665,0.10538121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008495594,0.00008466175,0.9386587,0.0000925736,0.000010249803,0.00033174653,0.022677563,0.00019074269,0.0002232977,0.0006834017,0.037010837,0.000027646794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1743888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31304875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99275106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072489455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040357597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34674746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W200449026","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2616","title":"Book Notes: The Global Model of Constitutional Rights, by Kai Möller","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02363554532439274,"score_gpt":0.27038715393659923,"score_spread":0.2467516086122065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W200449026","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019180285,0.097545035,0.005894813,0.36319882,0.005493373,0.000025244104,0.00051419943,0.000112298294,0.5252981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1375157,0.1169586,0.0087224,0.095451795,0.015327484,0.00022270942,0.0006585957,0.00056022685,0.6245824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99964535,0.000120044395,0.000012517134,0.00007656787,0.00011312803,0.000032482956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900573,0.00069232594,0.000053949592,0.00006999175,0.00013182472,0.000046191057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071325304,0.00055379566,0.0003647945,0.0014731347,0.0024519453,0.0049764197,0.00086175627,0.0034104509,0.020104012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002505374,0.0003546192,0.00024303165,0.002864541,0.006628476,0.009858505,0.0012301971,0.0046232445,0.0042712223],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004464143,0.0000066845437,0.000054735185,0.000031976786,0.0000017983144,0.000013652839,0.00029208267,0.00014605853,0.000021921893,0.6695944,0.32132727,0.008504927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000079908605,0.0000032907335,0.00026448246,0.00017336699,0.0000036483193,0.000035039684,0.00048225312,0.00018369991,0.000066265995,0.45531404,0.54345584,0.000010027048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0146848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030835427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020104012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036127556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019735554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06725466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004638390","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v7n2p81","title":"The Discordant Combination of Civil-Law Prosecution System and Presidentialism: A Theoretical Framework","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Political science; Law; Civil law (Civil law); Accountability; Criminal law; Judicial independence; Politics; Comparative law; Public law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.008596283324114315,"score_gpt":0.2714520114758257,"score_spread":0.2628557281517114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004638390","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17276916,0.0030458362,0.110107295,0.036804277,0.00034033906,0.00020528682,0.00027683607,0.0001255736,0.6763254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98851645,0.0006036283,0.0059777014,0.0004753964,0.00019813728,0.00008593375,0.00003701235,0.00001326092,0.004092625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968568,0.0016492516,0.00007804817,0.00052271393,0.00036514757,0.0005279067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99621224,0.0015558469,0.0010680576,0.0003337963,0.0003751549,0.00045489127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029861734,0.0004529795,0.0004669188,0.0036795123,0.003294659,0.0066531748,0.0016230056,0.0033235636,0.010074619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034102323,0.00039404503,0.00073754037,0.0018166094,0.017326932,0.004643558,0.0030416343,0.0015601849,0.0007201456],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025359705,0.000016476595,0.0004818971,0.0000091090515,0.0000031237325,0.000039695744,0.0002498874,0.00022763295,0.000027930988,0.9980082,0.00018333939,0.00075024687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004550925,0.00007780396,0.0036516658,0.00007701671,0.000036253427,0.00028450252,0.002250885,0.0068785106,0.00014758138,0.9744567,0.012067731,0.00002587229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020908297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023964776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010074619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003437274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027546121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03370297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004751260","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2505","title":"The role of reparative justice in responding to the legacy of Indian Residential Schools","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Settlement (finance); Wrongdoing; Plaintiff; Commission; Political science; Order (exchange); Compensation (psychology); Law; Payment; Value (mathematics); Business; Finance; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.010039394971988051,"score_gpt":0.26191666166364763,"score_spread":0.2518772666916596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004751260","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07114941,0.012592858,0.0181325,0.34213963,0.001918771,0.00017660428,0.000026530299,0.00019484121,0.5536688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94832844,0.0029432916,0.0027459557,0.031597644,0.0009747642,0.00006095321,0.0000071731147,0.000048811562,0.01329307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96584845,0.018073674,0.0008632245,0.0025136522,0.0049427995,0.0077583413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97477764,0.013048623,0.0029621774,0.0021193745,0.0034099754,0.0036822555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02521123,0.0003359445,0.0004606182,0.0022544758,0.02286714,0.028924925,0.0039482187,0.012264047,0.004367214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030481407,0.00042006155,0.00060940866,0.002057533,0.05658096,0.01286901,0.01472983,0.015564383,0.0007850953],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012969062,0.000043315384,0.0011169332,0.0000838312,0.000008352909,0.00061142124,0.018653503,0.0003051662,0.0002141785,0.94869727,0.009103476,0.02114972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023596675,0.00015049716,0.00413829,0.0008593581,0.00005774477,0.0014342866,0.082712166,0.0017566107,0.0012553913,0.5572036,0.35022897,0.0001794282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019838259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0379883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9873737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012626269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030606821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1333313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005027983","doi":"10.7202/1007818ar","title":"Breakdowns in the Democratic Process and the Law of Canadian Democracy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Jurisprudence; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Supreme court; Politics; Normative; Sociology","score_opus":0.02575296900620931,"score_gpt":0.2818926077589995,"score_spread":0.25613963875279017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005027983","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11886904,0.0035978216,0.018466815,0.027856026,0.0002527482,0.00022021784,0.00045860937,0.00017247358,0.83010626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97363937,0.0008853565,0.003478695,0.00094771356,0.000039380022,0.00004960216,0.00008597073,0.000030196818,0.020843726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865556,0.0014885721,0.00032231474,0.0014163798,0.0056497697,0.0045672795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938226,0.0013744453,0.00062059844,0.0006683445,0.0024844247,0.001029668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045098932,0.0003791409,0.0004201969,0.0033975116,0.024772791,0.009852796,0.001374303,0.0018452615,0.005224592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014641934,0.00037997199,0.0005024643,0.004059214,0.031210726,0.003635812,0.0041799624,0.005798413,0.00030133026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069767916,0.0000026692376,0.00061302603,0.000011889697,0.0000021823237,0.000032949294,0.0025846602,0.0003823756,0.00007278239,0.98974913,0.0014911272,0.0050502713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056968747,0.000022145721,0.015525808,0.00024304591,0.000035066078,0.00016018917,0.008834325,0.0046371818,0.0006787285,0.689232,0.28045842,0.00011603982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9625296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9685344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13724777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13724777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1128443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99580693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005828606","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2003.tb01173.x","title":"Litigation in Canadian referendum politics","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Politics; Political science; Jurisdiction; Treaty; Law; Democracy; Constitution; Humanities; Public administration; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04835473702286285,"score_gpt":0.2951007665525397,"score_spread":0.24674602952967684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005828606","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16888715,0.014583559,0.0024502254,0.08472369,0.0011424855,0.00017455973,0.0006937943,0.00025105028,0.72709346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8552749,0.004059813,0.0017943082,0.017469078,0.000256783,0.00007058268,0.0003322509,0.00007305659,0.12066926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864486,0.0013825066,0.0004228556,0.001394636,0.0056867753,0.0046647037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98995143,0.004238841,0.0006116646,0.00046324887,0.0034942972,0.0012404923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008146175,0.0004628124,0.00049397355,0.0039775427,0.041942805,0.012237418,0.0032684542,0.007909618,0.022015082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016683586,0.0007218211,0.0006653814,0.0067540137,0.009780126,0.0024573524,0.0063340277,0.0075538377,0.0009515138],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103713355,0.00008547051,0.010111027,0.00030848995,0.00003754995,0.0031110062,0.026840696,0.0010637103,0.0012716628,0.7985959,0.10042714,0.058043532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007751986,0.00005974011,0.023662647,0.00040485954,0.00008717504,0.0005523696,0.012750872,0.0015717965,0.0018890597,0.020036004,0.9387261,0.00018176845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98358077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98941606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17209995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17209995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18585126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9602467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007008393","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjm022","title":"Courts and Federalism: Judicial Doctrine in the United States, Australia, and Canada, by Gerald Baier","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Jurisprudence; Doctrine; Political science; Scholarship; Law; Nothing; Law and economics; Judicial review; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.02491157245994363,"score_gpt":0.2890151189613681,"score_spread":0.2641035465014245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007008393","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0090888105,0.4949644,0.0010909723,0.26950902,0.0029518092,0.000031129843,0.00018603401,0.000050347375,0.22212744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34108227,0.37121361,0.003086605,0.04200682,0.002834998,0.000058348705,0.00024190875,0.000107673055,0.23936771],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999035,0.00016369589,0.000021091506,0.00006411261,0.0005614613,0.00015474063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992488,0.00022980427,0.000051097304,0.000015789254,0.00033302506,0.000121456185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010308694,0.00035070782,0.00026591826,0.0017447311,0.0053285947,0.0047979187,0.00076236797,0.002158014,0.0028266783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004034405,0.00035379326,0.00018698964,0.0036002798,0.006994331,0.0034545246,0.0012065696,0.002781565,0.00042387305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019762625,0.000030136358,0.0013459278,0.00015895102,0.00001179061,0.00010215759,0.00632471,0.0006396368,0.0001229795,0.4535763,0.4860626,0.051605064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008551739,0.0000054984125,0.00899987,0.00076213,0.000012467816,0.00007995723,0.0036626102,0.0005338176,0.00006024533,0.074980974,0.9108704,0.000023474964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8448222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9081496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15517777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031282194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042294007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31218326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008220463","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2006.tb01984.x","title":"Tribunals and guidelines: Exploring the relationship between fairness and legitimacy in administrative decision-making","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Legitimacy; Commission; Public administration; Law; Humanities; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.22893367895911143,"score_gpt":0.3940501256658328,"score_spread":0.16511644670672138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008220463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44490618,0.0041042604,0.08861055,0.07884585,0.00068769656,0.00032239401,0.000054509364,0.000080015074,0.38238853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99361116,0.00017302163,0.0039008828,0.000756512,0.00006296831,0.00008202973,0.0000057413918,0.000012597614,0.0013950141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.85110253,0.116892055,0.005500856,0.005961421,0.014833314,0.0057098395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.64165235,0.29443547,0.024609763,0.011138633,0.02265637,0.005507422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08765822,0.00033197796,0.0009406638,0.004567547,0.011009033,0.017736541,0.0026755063,0.0070119584,0.0051700897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24588662,0.0005422299,0.00071809307,0.004392999,0.06904496,0.018483957,0.014010389,0.0060592247,0.00032257946],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035573023,0.00004683867,0.0043666395,0.00007984603,0.000016076872,0.000115767514,0.026636587,0.00073189265,0.0000741416,0.9568349,0.0006179483,0.010443674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064525375,0.000107052816,0.0063150683,0.00051539973,0.000031354743,0.00010111227,0.031385724,0.004378606,0.00027195958,0.9332436,0.023520948,0.000064662745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014761921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014280544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08765822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0123168845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018645013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4635865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009323749","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100010231","title":"Research Note: Revisiting the Collection of “Justice Statistics by Race” in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Race (biology); Economic Justice; Data collection; Sociology; Political science; Criminology; Law; Social science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.02311066027264884,"score_gpt":0.30775789517836677,"score_spread":0.2846472349057179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009323749","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0390344,0.010417194,0.011927073,0.80827516,0.018789934,0.0022051611,0.008874096,0.0003171543,0.10015979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43044144,0.017361285,0.045495983,0.3855586,0.0033754876,0.0018130969,0.0046351007,0.00053419184,0.11078485],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8856477,0.018808924,0.0081310505,0.007730799,0.06685839,0.012823127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.61759955,0.085710466,0.006437434,0.013182329,0.25644678,0.020623488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09281526,0.0006274155,0.0012760801,0.0076469807,0.041429654,0.020222915,0.009251906,0.006244664,0.0064888163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20870423,0.0012695151,0.0013148861,0.015602699,0.013688732,0.0072937263,0.0071308278,0.013869269,0.0008593467],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012110003,0.00011433679,0.022619545,0.00086448906,0.00010215379,0.00055518374,0.0374673,0.0010012935,0.0007519325,0.16586007,0.6977495,0.07279311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064585256,0.00008292903,0.061208252,0.001860113,0.00017138991,0.00011170734,0.03573277,0.0023857849,0.0016164326,0.008479369,0.88792723,0.00035951412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99746346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99783295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29054794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.29054794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.695258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8228638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009613640","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.4.499","title":"Electoral Fairness and the Law of Democracy: A Structural Rights Approach to Judicial Review","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Democracy; Law; Deference; Fundamental rights; Gerrymandering; Redistricting; Law and economics; Judicial review; Human rights; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.015573670904401118,"score_gpt":0.25021697575501783,"score_spread":0.2346433048506167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009613640","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022432322,0.022632184,0.31877968,0.18485449,0.0016632022,0.00076092867,0.00027611532,0.00027945498,0.44832164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.896167,0.0073094056,0.04962447,0.012657778,0.0031944064,0.0006212775,0.00009478397,0.00010552379,0.030225385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9486286,0.025726441,0.0021635164,0.005114166,0.013962504,0.0044047087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9469416,0.037337676,0.0023257146,0.0038631926,0.008350691,0.0011810444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.057789423,0.0004767012,0.0010681964,0.0037911134,0.0077412976,0.015202729,0.0031314907,0.009550636,0.0040805945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06615116,0.0007438173,0.001072763,0.0028737304,0.0324561,0.010500322,0.004159561,0.009743288,0.0005987589],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030229392,0.0000050446483,0.000088380315,0.000020144791,0.0000048643255,0.000017042908,0.000405056,0.0003679168,0.000044537064,0.9936394,0.0016567225,0.0037477459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032831736,0.000023284807,0.00031104052,0.00012251516,0.000014240085,0.000034801596,0.0001988388,0.0018572573,0.00020080044,0.9473057,0.04986712,0.000031551277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04727261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061673947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057789423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026895562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03866308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30562335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009788905","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-1346.2000.tb00577.x","title":"ISSUES AND OUTCOMES IN STATE SUPREME COURT JUDICIAL REVIEW CASES","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Southeastern Political Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Supreme court; Civil liberties; Law; Political science; State (computer science); Quarter (Canadian coin); Government (linguistics); Politics; History","score_opus":0.051383463093386844,"score_gpt":0.37572327817469653,"score_spread":0.3243398150813097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009788905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82515717,0.0059789885,0.0016235403,0.017410273,0.0003320211,0.00022666565,0.0011485767,0.000080222395,0.14804253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902592,0.00087371597,0.00022836692,0.002583128,0.00017629887,0.0001260218,0.000446712,0.000023224393,0.005283326],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9482702,0.019945722,0.0041631474,0.0029839594,0.017779348,0.006857614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86897,0.07941741,0.022786744,0.0035816545,0.021749184,0.003495027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043997746,0.00018525402,0.0005797811,0.008921754,0.0063295756,0.00919051,0.0014972228,0.0037148886,0.003980381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18112841,0.0005364788,0.00065687,0.010142425,0.0041813524,0.00324707,0.0040239515,0.0027132742,0.0008077537],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047612988,0.00073612336,0.46450755,0.00065502553,0.00029355646,0.0047911042,0.050675765,0.0037732546,0.0017263263,0.2775333,0.071765475,0.123066306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014360771,0.00055516785,0.7618451,0.0010822606,0.00026840632,0.0017691074,0.02936472,0.0024298925,0.0035903126,0.06583837,0.13283813,0.00027495544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02207553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051598694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043997746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007702503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006559453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23268515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010437755","doi":"10.1515/9781773855714-072","title":"8.1 Political Failure, Judicial Opportunity: The Supreme Court of Canada and Aboriginal and Treaty Rights","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Political science; Law; Supreme court; Politics","score_opus":0.021699491344589514,"score_gpt":0.22770152724088724,"score_spread":0.20600203589629773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010437755","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07854457,0.024628958,0.0021546218,0.2519951,0.00070548395,0.000059825325,0.00032603717,0.00003353462,0.6415519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93663126,0.00742509,0.0006828562,0.02469539,0.0007149082,0.000039259437,0.000091060596,0.00003557173,0.029684693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864254,0.0019249553,0.00018523046,0.0009293667,0.0043190373,0.006216061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98588055,0.00566638,0.0015487793,0.00034713812,0.004243455,0.0023137718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059890584,0.0004831868,0.00080613856,0.0029815459,0.029369533,0.02213626,0.0028573044,0.008291536,0.0079071345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015681162,0.00038038555,0.0007056624,0.0045443363,0.045416262,0.007175292,0.004776938,0.010950877,0.0004699149],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006696727,0.0000083957975,0.0024433618,0.000032400847,0.0000059473828,0.00014263227,0.005498495,0.00013207781,0.000026564816,0.9779584,0.0111286575,0.0026164493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082391656,0.000035364636,0.030652888,0.0016604272,0.00012432788,0.00029525222,0.040555738,0.0015955576,0.0004270473,0.47654867,0.44782326,0.00019897743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9615311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9660832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11112637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11112637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14788915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80628204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011843670","doi":"10.1093/icon/mol006","title":"Constitutionalism and policies toward women: Canada and the United States","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parallels; Constitutionalism; Dozen; Gender equity; Political science; Equity (law); Political economy; Sociology; Law; Gender studies; Economics; Democracy","score_opus":0.011874555518844613,"score_gpt":0.26382739331514155,"score_spread":0.25195283779629696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011843670","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34752887,0.042180818,0.0012699682,0.18321455,0.0007680063,0.00006667896,0.0009012396,0.00005513259,0.42401478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9676125,0.0071358318,0.00039782847,0.009498522,0.00007273905,0.000021014657,0.00012682214,0.000019943258,0.015114756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99336773,0.00073931314,0.000104743565,0.000412849,0.0019774942,0.003397874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99590176,0.0010009247,0.00028635078,0.000101866826,0.0013331091,0.0013760306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032428086,0.00026931168,0.00054417306,0.0029164667,0.02358531,0.010034272,0.0015129873,0.003128912,0.00471935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009412385,0.00029018574,0.00040040165,0.005217128,0.015799094,0.002185072,0.0030495261,0.0038880352,0.00014494777],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009297457,0.000032599666,0.011872389,0.00010765663,0.00004666516,0.00033299843,0.011615829,0.0011572087,0.00030319663,0.9277646,0.019898502,0.026775282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014822415,0.000096073156,0.14842616,0.0015299211,0.00023866326,0.00029148138,0.06817437,0.0015737563,0.0013419138,0.112871185,0.66498846,0.00031976108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9951363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99756336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14483187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14483187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20942947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9918738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013553651","doi":"10.7202/1013003ar","title":"La signification du droit à la liberté d’expression au crépuscule de l’idéal","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Freedom of expression; Political science; Human rights; Law","score_opus":0.0112266483568004,"score_gpt":0.24595530327013565,"score_spread":0.23472865491333525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013553651","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05211135,0.003983355,0.025823057,0.045934796,0.0003189023,0.000029429286,0.0000612279,0.000052720727,0.87168515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9637459,0.0011753917,0.0018997813,0.0019986336,0.00017528706,0.000045469453,0.000022703947,0.00004722757,0.030889533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905059,0.0050759614,0.00021460703,0.0010890317,0.0019559583,0.0011585271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99471384,0.0028763388,0.0006038024,0.00082152284,0.00059198606,0.00039250322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005962945,0.00040670333,0.00048147366,0.0012537887,0.007625961,0.013165438,0.0011229417,0.0036410156,0.006733891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007287284,0.00031206734,0.00048042453,0.0011288659,0.07462476,0.0073281913,0.0060187443,0.0072723962,0.0007194363],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036499227,0.0000016713432,0.000057536432,0.0000076491615,8.035782e-7,0.000009836707,0.003066401,0.000026954418,0.00003457446,0.9957755,0.00026245642,0.00075297756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000185678,0.000026453412,0.0009295076,0.00019932969,0.000012781583,0.00011511294,0.009030077,0.0003118973,0.0004876034,0.83306277,0.15577845,0.000027538665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018449891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02121599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018449891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009918753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009172326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07196587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016119038","doi":"10.1017/s0008423904240215","title":"Chrétien and Canadian Federalism, Politics and the Constitution, 1993–2003","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Constitution; Parliament; Politics; Memoir; Political science; Law; Biography","score_opus":0.01861059505004551,"score_gpt":0.2715755101814465,"score_spread":0.25296491513140096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016119038","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03887863,0.18534172,0.00063461624,0.13239011,0.001599878,0.00007046092,0.0013870556,0.000087178385,0.6396102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67258185,0.086895615,0.0013661045,0.019078502,0.0005728547,0.00007960589,0.0009841614,0.00011407161,0.21832731],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976216,0.00021192298,0.000046645782,0.00020120417,0.0009938624,0.0009247808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984074,0.0004032226,0.00014957681,0.00006239036,0.0007055869,0.00027185163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018179008,0.00042878764,0.00034166535,0.0036581096,0.022781428,0.009219204,0.0014130097,0.0037694997,0.0075853355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006609573,0.00052567554,0.00028269875,0.011342854,0.0105628455,0.002687248,0.0016036036,0.0044930917,0.0005597149],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049516948,0.000022431,0.0022316177,0.00017165845,0.000012567277,0.00020658762,0.021684779,0.00032508696,0.00013012056,0.6781857,0.261558,0.03542195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011893201,0.000005138534,0.016072882,0.00029355372,0.00001586956,0.00009045864,0.010112495,0.00012036993,0.00010966174,0.011126201,0.96200407,0.000037492187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9954887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7825248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21747519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19859552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90761787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016158199","doi":"10.1177/0090591707299808","title":"Citizenship as Inherited Property","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Politics; Scrutiny; Citizenship; Realm; Property (philosophy); Property rights; Analogy; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); State (computer science); Political science; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.052380025567756144,"score_gpt":0.34489306100206124,"score_spread":0.29251303543430507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016158199","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25873467,0.0020595505,0.04072539,0.011055676,0.00017722945,0.000054787313,0.000120778626,0.000060472852,0.6870114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888769,0.00021192705,0.0010441499,0.00026770527,0.00007219255,0.000022962651,0.000014970738,0.000012201678,0.009477105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99706036,0.0012292123,0.00012056964,0.0005172929,0.0005101042,0.00056250446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977665,0.0009613547,0.00022263441,0.00063307467,0.00026100487,0.00015548585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027035638,0.00016822458,0.00022538775,0.00085491885,0.002822138,0.005882596,0.0006890978,0.001508639,0.0037672997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004696399,0.00014947166,0.00028250233,0.0006719614,0.025617402,0.00457106,0.003433937,0.0023542843,0.00032732054],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017228405,0.0000031098052,0.00029503566,0.0000034592674,0.0000013868414,0.000028618653,0.0008787702,0.000085396176,0.000052874228,0.996985,0.00011845711,0.001546205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010152554,0.000023143062,0.0010812017,0.000034482375,0.000010753198,0.00012620384,0.0009356906,0.00060919946,0.0002828497,0.97154164,0.025337307,0.0000073235533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042115664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040345215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005882596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030927632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018470427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022439718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016940363","doi":"","title":"Mapping Judicial Independence: Toward a Comparative Taxonomy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Taxonomy (biology); Independence (probability theory); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Mathematics; Statistics; Biology","score_opus":0.054817575136196985,"score_gpt":0.297162550169942,"score_spread":0.242344975033745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016940363","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3469004,0.0035356383,0.19690982,0.0033123149,0.000079191785,0.00030977972,0.003794831,0.000353263,0.44480482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9520555,0.001240543,0.041204467,0.00015860063,0.000028228395,0.00015079808,0.0019649602,0.00007578526,0.003121062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99574226,0.0015727335,0.00039974667,0.00055682624,0.0013470944,0.00038124673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9825119,0.008125877,0.0021162017,0.003273114,0.003465039,0.00050791743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042912858,0.00038683743,0.0007176077,0.025640383,0.004162333,0.008419006,0.0015578335,0.0010704711,0.0121067315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026385019,0.00044502385,0.00048767787,0.020557784,0.0050200396,0.015207948,0.004613685,0.0020196242,0.0012840006],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008165502,0.00012849482,0.09725378,0.00052629993,0.000088135406,0.0001266147,0.01629868,0.002503292,0.0018081143,0.60464877,0.004766146,0.27177003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023181035,0.00010541067,0.14536208,0.0006655611,0.000108983506,0.0003396998,0.050307468,0.009784325,0.001810329,0.725234,0.06620203,0.00005702429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076795835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013989985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025640383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024310332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034609046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040501118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017292580","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2010.500831","title":"Supreme Court of Canada – structure, status and challenges","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Original jurisdiction; Mandate; Jurisdiction; Remand (court procedure); Political science; Judicial independence; Administrative law; Court of record; Certiorari","score_opus":0.026019683573685455,"score_gpt":0.262253881313707,"score_spread":0.23623419774002158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017292580","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055001874,0.0278693,0.0025816057,0.5710638,0.0019172985,0.00023805717,0.0012615027,0.00019866883,0.33986792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8139404,0.02013117,0.0053291135,0.06983061,0.0018718259,0.000175642,0.00092641386,0.00016220481,0.087632686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9778496,0.0023108772,0.0005450244,0.0020786107,0.00992011,0.0072957575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9570775,0.0056980285,0.0013758701,0.0011016749,0.021192288,0.013554782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0148763275,0.0004938024,0.00085973623,0.005801861,0.034261934,0.028130397,0.0072247703,0.008213033,0.011410096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030474653,0.0010019329,0.0006026174,0.008706967,0.01664685,0.0060564224,0.00568107,0.010451179,0.0009045545],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023486133,0.00005050765,0.0039561368,0.0001044966,0.000017529293,0.00021340698,0.0028802636,0.00046141606,0.00014071255,0.847244,0.09991927,0.044988755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007330411,0.00005813988,0.032749735,0.0012715176,0.000057929126,0.00020122646,0.013696781,0.002438755,0.0003174834,0.123096,0.8258004,0.00023864122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.988736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99305385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22012119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22012119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.43386716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9045489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W201753266","doi":"","title":"Measuring Judicial Activism on the Supreme Court of Canada: A Comment on Newfoundland (Treasury Board) V. Nape","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Judicial activism; Political science; Appeal; Judicial review; Legislature","score_opus":0.036966772179187465,"score_gpt":0.2444831273525288,"score_spread":0.20751635517334133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W201753266","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23930576,0.012508777,0.0015439746,0.566973,0.0016015596,0.00043740275,0.0052613243,0.0001334862,0.17223473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8568476,0.004334544,0.0014471406,0.10871454,0.0007877333,0.00031647112,0.0011520179,0.000094113995,0.026305903],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96225303,0.0068337624,0.0013229734,0.003145517,0.019253267,0.007191486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8735471,0.08054693,0.0078365505,0.0019946275,0.030938193,0.005136623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018043324,0.0008803907,0.00089552044,0.006800655,0.04037716,0.02087746,0.0050999005,0.008125666,0.0028054975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09603779,0.00090125046,0.00064874534,0.015476124,0.018973159,0.004049958,0.0031466954,0.011998766,0.0003434961],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021245355,0.00020642766,0.12436395,0.0005161903,0.00019350823,0.0011580013,0.1712326,0.0008357319,0.00085282425,0.1523891,0.51133317,0.036705997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000079079044,0.00016324666,0.48566854,0.0018791182,0.0003601174,0.00016410078,0.21894109,0.0017106171,0.0022662121,0.008780384,0.2794077,0.0005798856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99463826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18677016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18677016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15990569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94323134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018150336","doi":"10.2307/3505128","title":"10.2307/3505128","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":365,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Political philosophy; Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics; Comparative law","score_opus":0.012792714028428428,"score_gpt":0.22750587903695402,"score_spread":0.21471316500852558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018150336","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024349592,0.00031054244,0.00030195783,0.00030073212,0.0003267191,0.000042752534,0.0009057352,0.0005718835,0.99699616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009962581,0.00032514354,0.00039653358,0.0003750123,0.00008753349,0.000030387819,0.0011465899,0.0003230486,0.99631953],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946386,0.000048999438,0.000040021212,0.0001358441,0.00022891177,0.0000824543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99806494,0.0004504819,0.000075045384,0.00036892228,0.00045330205,0.00058725453],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008129788,0.0014969455,0.0011165597,0.0023326178,0.0017469383,0.0049805017,0.0018586534,0.0025903275,0.98573583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023132954,0.00078228355,0.0007314696,0.00269643,0.0017988133,0.0057601184,0.00416011,0.0016375686,0.98610026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012451297,0.0001279358,0.00039713457,0.0003637371,0.00001178524,0.00014456049,0.00008815636,0.00012169035,0.001051689,0.0064789774,0.6198017,0.37128815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020519763,0.000024854167,0.00071023096,0.00016305086,0.0000047802664,0.00015494972,0.00012101576,0.000084435815,0.00015582507,0.0012134043,0.9973339,0.000013045642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004430134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048846337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014264166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011829596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014535383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020346105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018826812","doi":"10.7202/042190ar","title":"L'égalité selon la Cour suprême","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Meaning (existential); Political science; Sociology; Subject (documents); Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.010711717006732843,"score_gpt":0.2597845375894135,"score_spread":0.24907282058268065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018826812","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034619868,0.011271724,0.0034618017,0.05817018,0.0012342975,0.00003283385,0.00016134669,0.000108617554,0.8909393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6586602,0.003915464,0.0017141651,0.0127570275,0.0007710804,0.000054802764,0.00005796346,0.00007335365,0.321996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994962,0.0015535334,0.000063013154,0.00060416583,0.0019448951,0.0008724519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99762887,0.0011202332,0.00015009037,0.00016238113,0.00071660813,0.00022185092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00254307,0.00043310705,0.00038364876,0.0010120604,0.0092572225,0.011878739,0.00062205916,0.0032479032,0.010633892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00752437,0.00022558641,0.00032417057,0.00083000946,0.009831123,0.0030367523,0.0019246341,0.00641997,0.0010920807],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013721572,0.000006544682,0.00043396503,0.000018345161,0.0000036867348,0.0000809087,0.0046218936,0.000070069,0.00018713617,0.97008914,0.015260332,0.009214175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001582085,0.000018913439,0.0030955211,0.000144891,0.000008024638,0.0001394714,0.005235153,0.00022636671,0.00051258795,0.04400333,0.94656634,0.00003353784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47664437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4782976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5233556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018099612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011608813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94773996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W20199416","doi":"10.1111/j.1525-1470.2009.01069.x","title":"Petitioner's Observations on Canada's Additional Information","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pediatric Dermatology","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Petitioner; Political science","score_opus":0.016686444012769513,"score_gpt":0.2391803852590053,"score_spread":0.2224939412462358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W20199416","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09317529,0.010679714,0.0009097594,0.10763253,0.018793052,0.00021162508,0.011555737,0.00040600233,0.7566364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3443207,0.006206805,0.0005972997,0.019692475,0.0023194593,0.000037303795,0.0014641195,0.0001375895,0.6252242],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997749,0.000012169055,0.000012742166,0.000037089336,0.000074285184,0.000088926376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994271,0.000093941024,0.000044282395,0.000028492792,0.00023829276,0.00016796429],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010650867,0.00038831314,0.0002525149,0.0013545571,0.0022509014,0.00047408632,0.00090670574,0.0020336136,0.11351663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012394824,0.00013574892,0.00035001806,0.0009068158,0.00047187848,0.0005344763,0.00054025406,0.0019642175,0.0075364695],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001987839,0.000110943256,0.018313793,0.0001904967,0.00002892232,0.18897736,0.0013580186,0.0004326154,0.0015263758,0.0037485333,0.7196663,0.06544791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022753655,0.00006711401,0.01855292,0.00032158763,0.000019399655,0.040269867,0.001202325,0.00018217764,0.00077321345,0.0005453333,0.9379966,0.000046554662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4515694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5179303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54843056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032320928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034756318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.897882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020852836","doi":"10.1177/106591290205500110","title":"Attitudinal Dimensions of Supreme Court Decision Making in Canada: The Lamer Court, 1991-1995","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Conservatism; Charter; Political science; Voting; Law; Context (archaeology); Roberts Court; Principal (computer security); Politics","score_opus":0.12749155805501733,"score_gpt":0.40548025179090824,"score_spread":0.2779886937358909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020852836","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9862111,0.0004928756,0.0001105311,0.0020703683,0.000019234205,0.00004520571,0.0008069895,0.00000803213,0.010235557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955813,0.00027952617,0.00012773875,0.00020490806,0.000008115361,0.000009341775,0.00040986185,0.0000040042137,0.0033752518],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997623,0.00014936882,0.000063788815,0.00016446607,0.0012183905,0.0007810313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99325126,0.00064443925,0.0010575705,0.00011235287,0.0035523432,0.001381908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022203836,0.00020733634,0.00031009802,0.0019458261,0.008144785,0.002639115,0.00096602086,0.00067766453,0.003082839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00819517,0.00024231694,0.00031537947,0.0035190852,0.0020828003,0.0006435089,0.00084997143,0.0017313535,0.00026119305],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000185995,0.00021991525,0.9130927,0.00006547577,0.000068523324,0.00022565748,0.030700706,0.000766242,0.0007183087,0.0055070203,0.011352079,0.037097476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005935344,0.000022802284,0.9812555,0.00002508218,0.000011733066,0.000027134478,0.010290708,0.00035399065,0.00014533038,0.00012565656,0.0077085677,0.00002767805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9977519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99935585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11180365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11180365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.077053435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8111961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021055257","doi":"10.3828/bjcs.19.2.5","title":"The Rawlsian Paradox and the Governance of Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Science and Engineering Research Board","keywords":"Polity; Charter; Constitution; Context (archaeology); Politics; Political science; Corporate governance; Law; Constitutionalism; Parliament; Political economy; Democracy; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Economics","score_opus":0.010130898722740275,"score_gpt":0.22207278372484912,"score_spread":0.21194188500210884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021055257","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06695931,0.01096398,0.0036079837,0.16620493,0.00047242566,0.00007912505,0.0007174685,0.00011696678,0.75087774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94192743,0.0046405885,0.001405397,0.0093930615,0.00010817576,0.00002969972,0.00015747888,0.000047175276,0.042291075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965702,0.00038988728,0.00006552453,0.00037574433,0.0011931449,0.0014055036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970004,0.000508538,0.00020388051,0.00017853669,0.0013245299,0.0007841947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019789226,0.00023120489,0.00037796044,0.0017446239,0.01643388,0.009263649,0.0012325282,0.0019058618,0.008228102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006216621,0.00022398072,0.0003185834,0.0035295964,0.016223187,0.0028420475,0.0029406687,0.0031225441,0.00027895524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009562056,0.0000049574282,0.0008003486,0.000022635017,0.0000055375253,0.00008499193,0.0012806739,0.00059780414,0.0000410643,0.9750509,0.015481288,0.006620251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047065383,0.000013457364,0.0095363865,0.00025355813,0.000023251174,0.00009832692,0.0055695986,0.002319207,0.00021079907,0.5069437,0.47488979,0.000094815994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9895577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.989602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81066525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18933475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15854879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9402568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024782077","doi":"10.7202/1000624ar","title":"Legality as Reason: Dicey, Rand, and the Rule of Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Law; Rule of law; Constitution; Constitutionalism; Public law; Political science; Comparative law; Philosophy of law; Sociology; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.05092749860751865,"score_gpt":0.28922524883468015,"score_spread":0.2382977502271615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024782077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05125379,0.062252067,0.0053298664,0.2536247,0.0008215587,0.000052200878,0.00013428988,0.00006407031,0.6264674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92000514,0.0136903655,0.0023122318,0.020965658,0.00039610697,0.00004122034,0.00006222786,0.000049946728,0.04247703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949785,0.0012614083,0.00010649565,0.0005544322,0.0015236529,0.0015754377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958087,0.0022091472,0.0002812931,0.0001798625,0.0009438467,0.00057711656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041915025,0.00034771278,0.00063295284,0.0016784166,0.01736549,0.017274925,0.0018109229,0.0059058904,0.0021101355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007576438,0.0003602109,0.00043671325,0.0021221228,0.05870387,0.006593825,0.0033520989,0.008611049,0.0003004049],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047327526,0.0000048133975,0.00026918724,0.000013356046,0.0000021188494,0.000062955616,0.0040894183,0.00009527915,0.000016768236,0.9876957,0.0053494875,0.002396052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033890552,0.000015609492,0.0036453418,0.00040896464,0.000024431993,0.0001724124,0.014232117,0.00072593096,0.00024509334,0.66892654,0.31149426,0.000075363496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90003335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9069813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90003335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07452166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07306632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.540695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025065369","doi":"10.7202/042663ar","title":"The Proposed Section 96B : An Ill-Conceived Reform Destined to Failure","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.012330239767582012,"score_gpt":0.2536858776288648,"score_spread":0.24135563786128278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025065369","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055387348,0.0018560529,0.021458361,0.08107307,0.0013723305,0.00013459724,0.0003351284,0.00013674475,0.83824635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7509093,0.0008487617,0.006572899,0.021210067,0.0007320975,0.00044206338,0.00016700992,0.00016658075,0.21895126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99384475,0.002034728,0.00018700029,0.0011068522,0.0016452111,0.0011814589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99705803,0.00078236085,0.00033487656,0.0008557769,0.00062004005,0.00034898648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007320841,0.00045035183,0.00047609705,0.0009773881,0.0041618664,0.009662278,0.0017280343,0.0064791315,0.008509653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013250662,0.00039873787,0.00059957645,0.0008898603,0.016798519,0.004867812,0.004611662,0.008264001,0.0019993798],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008131042,0.0000055088726,0.00014853508,0.000007507215,0.0000013974446,0.000015319243,0.0005598758,0.00013967481,0.00006538352,0.99411833,0.0032846848,0.0016456842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066299166,0.00005628529,0.0011172455,0.0002687081,0.000016018148,0.00006858832,0.0013315501,0.0009723386,0.0005510872,0.6256473,0.3698652,0.00003930966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021878129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018912537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021878129,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009241251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011654966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06705028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025174668","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.2.091212","title":"OPINION WRITING AND AUTHORSHIP ON THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Legal writing; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Style (visual arts); Writing style; Government (linguistics); Political science; Dissenting opinion; Judicial opinion; Staffing; Sociology; Literature; Linguistics; Philosophy; Art; Medicine","score_opus":0.023712041430609454,"score_gpt":0.22749929703170937,"score_spread":0.20378725560109992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025174668","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8068046,0.001626733,0.0002520592,0.0076702577,0.00021846716,0.000037458718,0.0007263353,0.00003042568,0.18263364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98602444,0.0005977962,0.00021608612,0.00031815688,0.000050490744,0.0000058624405,0.0001636796,0.000023562769,0.012599805],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918629,0.001156319,0.00025694934,0.00047802264,0.004740896,0.0015049492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9469659,0.013276427,0.0074794223,0.0016603076,0.02488978,0.0057281787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003661403,0.00019628293,0.00036561527,0.003344817,0.01318171,0.007555307,0.0007549886,0.0006384432,0.0074023237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043597728,0.00016218075,0.00017557407,0.006732144,0.0054504224,0.0013721766,0.0023629507,0.0012571219,0.0005743552],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022746695,0.000136166,0.24126843,0.00021424981,0.000073484145,0.0023846994,0.37476882,0.0007669154,0.0020807504,0.07990511,0.0891407,0.20903325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029748731,0.00005738184,0.58315176,0.0005824088,0.000048939106,0.00055811496,0.17341055,0.0012796503,0.0012282674,0.009869003,0.22960822,0.000176069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8770632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95522225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.122936785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042457167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050448697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30804974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026316860","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.1.23","title":"JUDICIAL RESTRAINT IN THE PURSUIT OF JUSTICE","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial restraint; Adjudication; Political science; Worry; Economic Justice; Law; Reputation; Honesty; Judicial opinion; Judicial activism; Judicial review; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.01814470664394893,"score_gpt":0.26093746463234535,"score_spread":0.24279275798839642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026316860","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19319834,0.013752035,0.06661929,0.14998962,0.0013747677,0.00025817624,0.00005973738,0.00014197026,0.5746061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816409,0.0011077973,0.0030370192,0.0072912066,0.0005264177,0.00008639534,0.000009491355,0.00003250713,0.00626817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9309528,0.037958268,0.0036421358,0.0044838465,0.015836505,0.0071265297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9292519,0.047778137,0.0067930617,0.006607839,0.007409347,0.0021596553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046660274,0.00041826506,0.0010862978,0.0015522187,0.012608881,0.010544259,0.0027329,0.011205926,0.002197915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.086972095,0.00063053635,0.0006793167,0.0018297491,0.036955114,0.007234404,0.010664695,0.012274911,0.0007065207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002358227,0.0000132557325,0.0009412402,0.00004091278,0.000017651662,0.0002518738,0.010158094,0.00031560133,0.00034650724,0.9782956,0.0024333822,0.0071622278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000076813536,0.000070113274,0.0027044695,0.00047999804,0.000038247126,0.00030906338,0.007678965,0.0011006457,0.0006177738,0.88747895,0.099364646,0.00008034373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015272441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016695393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046660274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007533485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016880797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24676609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028611703","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2009.00095.x","title":"The Transformation of the Supreme Court of Canada: An Empirical Examination <i>By</i> DONALD R. SONGER","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Charter; Court of record; Constitution; Court of equity; Concurring opinion; Remand (court procedure); Original jurisdiction; Legislature","score_opus":0.02944391954885508,"score_gpt":0.27536890724518565,"score_spread":0.24592498769633056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028611703","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4973121,0.13474987,0.00082330016,0.18676233,0.0008209582,0.00032967216,0.009806813,0.00006326077,0.16933165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9413895,0.036776032,0.0005044308,0.0051958445,0.00017957352,0.000056997607,0.0020134759,0.00006598616,0.013818169],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99338704,0.0007452576,0.00015119746,0.00052908505,0.0037401856,0.00144725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820077,0.004435124,0.0024631848,0.00037448618,0.008324479,0.0023951735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032034745,0.00034988628,0.0005286436,0.006227525,0.014861485,0.008816282,0.0025624766,0.0018244548,0.009625476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019453304,0.00068007974,0.00040529956,0.025167152,0.009365981,0.0046201674,0.0025499566,0.004455485,0.00072249275],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000839731,0.00024574154,0.23621598,0.0005870427,0.00011149375,0.00069500855,0.1466569,0.0007277725,0.00014519825,0.13953836,0.38276237,0.09223019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026835178,0.000028946706,0.54973763,0.0024208112,0.000069071066,0.00021927556,0.15754503,0.0012255966,0.00022599116,0.0074389735,0.28092748,0.00013426563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9948301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99670285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8721993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12780069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12882178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92726326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028840259","doi":"10.1093/icon/moq002","title":"Proportionality: An assault on human rights?: A reply","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Human rights; Law; Political science; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.04493501811351099,"score_gpt":0.3839571434318165,"score_spread":0.33902212531830556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028840259","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00045089936,0.0019030474,0.00050483766,0.99077386,0.0028038877,0.0000032360767,0.000018825112,0.00001146615,0.0035298802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027243132,0.004267035,0.00095474056,0.94597155,0.013126326,0.00003416326,0.000023048347,0.000058984468,0.008320981],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98882663,0.0045512035,0.00057612127,0.002267136,0.0028046703,0.0009742731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9726317,0.0218222,0.0009646125,0.0008021265,0.0028866546,0.0008927859],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012679625,0.00080953096,0.0010662545,0.001498184,0.006968734,0.007110725,0.0042551346,0.03864143,0.008206995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039743755,0.00049808464,0.0014075937,0.0019615812,0.02247741,0.022065006,0.0061380165,0.039244544,0.0029307157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030398953,0.000027185435,0.00035356075,0.000112366084,0.000012623403,0.00030946388,0.003040452,0.00014140527,0.00015568858,0.49995387,0.484892,0.01097101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000488932,0.00004543677,0.0006789841,0.00048197308,0.000016041915,0.0005365519,0.008118038,0.00058049185,0.0004837644,0.3297372,0.65917104,0.000101634694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008165917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069631953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03864143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061759157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007764367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06705707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030920387","doi":"10.5235/20414005.4.4.700","title":"Complementing Comparison: Renewing Analytical Legal Theory to Meet the Explanatory Challenge of Globalisation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transnational Legal Theory","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Parochialism; State (computer science); Relevance (law); Law and economics; Subject (documents); Political science; Subject matter; Jurisprudence; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Positive economics; Economics; Philosophy; Politics; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.05149921933476077,"score_gpt":0.3310499935176134,"score_spread":0.2795507741828526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030920387","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0661117,0.011961338,0.24738237,0.15529521,0.0023358637,0.00017320177,0.00009182085,0.00028258262,0.5163658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92748046,0.0035142587,0.04535038,0.008233933,0.0009301425,0.0002614062,0.000099580335,0.000320574,0.013809219],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9791757,0.015560683,0.0004412936,0.0018434045,0.0020127515,0.00096612866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9750602,0.014918718,0.0011283675,0.0057114586,0.0024875985,0.0006936458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025597496,0.00072585815,0.0016356994,0.0042475266,0.0059820795,0.013488026,0.0028152033,0.004555519,0.0072070346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029286329,0.00032315816,0.0009541288,0.0037905697,0.053621173,0.041115656,0.0134463655,0.008088139,0.0006321854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004458756,0.000004580417,0.00010542025,0.000020441013,0.0000032483738,0.00002330422,0.0034580706,0.00015835855,0.000023076713,0.9911907,0.00052428193,0.0044840625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046808414,0.000009194915,0.000096101474,0.00007660373,0.0000037293514,0.00002594479,0.0028314851,0.0005146346,0.000064716434,0.97332656,0.023040475,0.000005807783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029723747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035399576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025597496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075753625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054308753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13537413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031340195","doi":"10.1089/1533129041492268","title":"The Administration of Canada's Independent, Non-Partisan Approach","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Election law; Administration (probate law); Political science; Campaign finance; Democracy; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.013278885009387207,"score_gpt":0.28729867776734475,"score_spread":0.2740197927579575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031340195","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07139093,0.0020151339,0.009013796,0.16551976,0.0012762301,0.00030037735,0.00054025865,0.00020434514,0.7497392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7917781,0.0007786544,0.003935016,0.027311737,0.0004957013,0.00016470607,0.00011331705,0.0001674922,0.17525525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97676146,0.003692974,0.00033354663,0.0021860707,0.011122894,0.0059031085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9645523,0.0064469324,0.0010149729,0.002517627,0.017319387,0.008148747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012860641,0.0004917106,0.0007114618,0.003909767,0.03324619,0.016990079,0.0027216324,0.006561346,0.011228985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034479313,0.0007497475,0.00067556114,0.0036368244,0.013031998,0.0027185848,0.004874548,0.008611199,0.0009838467],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005467614,0.00006633378,0.0041371505,0.000044156648,0.00005416918,0.000077950295,0.004293277,0.0007407647,0.0003112437,0.85055274,0.11441137,0.025256198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013836284,0.0000611246,0.031100975,0.00025975466,0.00012931123,0.000073061114,0.006295368,0.0031989424,0.0011721874,0.13565585,0.82171714,0.00019798498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96782684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98729825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.117790185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.117790185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2937951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8546316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031808727","doi":"10.17808/des.36.204","title":"\"A quem cabe a escolha?\" Sobre a importância de distinguir os métodos alternativos de interpretação jurídica","year":2014,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Direito Estado e Sociedade","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.026726691247520622,"score_gpt":0.32022987930486624,"score_spread":0.2935031880573456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031808727","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11698727,0.014732235,0.06564888,0.09398639,0.0015773666,0.00007058293,0.00028281976,0.00019337298,0.7065211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9697555,0.003022734,0.009742563,0.0021470874,0.00048318724,0.00007566505,0.00006011558,0.00007784314,0.014635371],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99135524,0.0055407337,0.0003182642,0.0006858519,0.0016372598,0.00046267486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896488,0.006494181,0.0011297923,0.001364306,0.0010455544,0.0003173418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010404563,0.00048357886,0.00054657826,0.0033560488,0.006513452,0.013093533,0.0015487736,0.0022876225,0.0047434773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015242213,0.0002458315,0.0005412687,0.0034292177,0.049120497,0.008493431,0.0045679756,0.0048966943,0.00049925136],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074135546,0.0000033982278,0.00049588183,0.000029727302,0.0000024301653,0.000022406199,0.0075739115,0.000067438166,0.00006008517,0.9869332,0.0011921345,0.0036120242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018011024,0.000038943384,0.0032418715,0.00033332303,0.00002148155,0.00016849737,0.028773164,0.000929374,0.0004643049,0.8416739,0.124298915,0.00003823993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056132986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012227687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013093533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042216815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048534684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05502522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031885758","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12342001","title":"Africa’s Imperial Presidents: Immunity, Impunity and Accountability","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impunity; Presidential system; Constitutionalism; Accountability; Law; Political science; Autocracy; Democracy; Rule of law; Separation of powers; Presidency; Law and economics; Human rights; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.06721779604262115,"score_gpt":0.35442351446103093,"score_spread":0.2872057184184098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031885758","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48228785,0.00959779,0.0020492792,0.07026087,0.0005583224,0.000034031505,0.000022620417,0.000020132144,0.43516922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99558,0.00060069526,0.00009808583,0.000638646,0.00009367773,0.0000026329806,0.0000016239185,0.0000020980183,0.0029826479],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963174,0.0021351208,0.00011106457,0.00017266774,0.0004901646,0.00077361404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893909,0.006310428,0.0022250777,0.00027898865,0.00083290384,0.0009617286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040665846,0.00012194111,0.00018621724,0.00086709816,0.0038683102,0.0052745524,0.00031254996,0.0013431547,0.0032717802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015874298,0.00013961265,0.00009931776,0.00073086756,0.007845237,0.0031298166,0.0022532803,0.0027470172,0.0001714631],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042148702,0.00004119786,0.006999236,0.00011869356,0.000012508087,0.0009233496,0.03768389,0.00018239357,0.00049584726,0.9232519,0.0069384784,0.02331046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005945651,0.00020185129,0.056983914,0.00091948826,0.000056529487,0.0016870351,0.058939468,0.0011976318,0.0028130033,0.21654293,0.66052186,0.00007683055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026928922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052745524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028594693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023732835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021506429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034465670","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0066","title":"Legal universalism: Persistent objections","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Universalism; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.011496792284269482,"score_gpt":0.2280273932835177,"score_spread":0.21653060099924823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034465670","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016309164,0.014380479,0.028341297,0.8587789,0.0035943452,0.00009756866,0.00013957685,0.00017089151,0.07818774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7373184,0.006333538,0.012939315,0.22207351,0.014244313,0.00051533844,0.00010754683,0.00023614938,0.0062318947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8949899,0.04769864,0.005444174,0.015716707,0.03221037,0.003940233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.71764493,0.23554488,0.010124976,0.021011844,0.012323793,0.0033495866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.120179944,0.00068439636,0.0027393964,0.0032314782,0.0067147086,0.010064338,0.0071229124,0.018014112,0.005744304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24392602,0.0009587996,0.0015863925,0.0023213958,0.11832019,0.022801261,0.0134521425,0.035419445,0.0006514318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014989281,0.000019131585,0.00018793251,0.00006333997,0.000018871151,0.000024678055,0.000618356,0.00012314787,0.000025641302,0.9915957,0.0038132267,0.0034949612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004780889,0.000015152155,0.00019987623,0.00014623816,0.000015824326,0.00004585834,0.00030696875,0.0002518911,0.0001316891,0.97792244,0.020901522,0.0000148088375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033485135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015874148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.120179944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012081419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009514335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6355799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035058819","doi":"10.1017/s0008423900000238","title":"Models of Public Brokerage: A Reply to Professors Ajzenstat andLusztig","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Sociology; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.06933159791652244,"score_gpt":0.3264673934546688,"score_spread":0.25713579553814636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035058819","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011747874,0.0030571357,0.00054594065,0.9879702,0.0004436748,0.0000032039268,0.00003160634,0.000016720476,0.006756638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4284381,0.022145905,0.0021428205,0.5146526,0.011148943,0.00007492029,0.00011701864,0.00019772419,0.021081878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993905,0.0026441605,0.00017615057,0.0007801814,0.0015113101,0.00098308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9733218,0.018909927,0.0011055021,0.0012547892,0.0034505092,0.001957446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012708503,0.0006307626,0.0016131357,0.001411461,0.01040067,0.014112863,0.0060046716,0.025341552,0.010102764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033020232,0.0007380842,0.0011200384,0.0036791014,0.030515619,0.019625481,0.0045757946,0.018976035,0.001233815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029674438,0.000014588374,0.0002684179,0.00004622909,0.000014134806,0.00008294369,0.0018012907,0.0009785211,0.000025645306,0.77182233,0.22259112,0.0023250966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010147869,0.00001291703,0.00081123016,0.00021009674,0.00003316452,0.00008912632,0.0034318736,0.0041888077,0.00009307023,0.7627903,0.22813925,0.000098670025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39068103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31927675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39068103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040515244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025476214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77681404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035135639","doi":"10.1163/156851712x644721","title":"The Relation between Roman and Local Law in the Babatha and Salome Komaise Archives: General Analysis and Three Case Studies on Law of Succession, Guardianship and Marriage. By Jacobine G. Oudshoorn. STDJ 69. Leiden: Brill, 2007. Hardcover. Pp. xiv + 456. € 161.00/US$ 224.00. ISBN 978-90-041-4974-8.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dead Sea Discoveries","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legal guardian; Dead Sea Scrolls; Jewish studies; Relation (database); Biblical studies; Ecological succession; Hebrew Bible; Law; History; Brill; Genealogy; Political science; Classics; Archaeology; Biology; Judaism; Computer science","score_opus":0.023266615486531538,"score_gpt":0.29319775186871383,"score_spread":0.2699311363821823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035135639","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4162607,0.058073465,0.0015840655,0.012863175,0.0002603209,0.00021920027,0.00058010576,0.000047652415,0.5101114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93855894,0.011545907,0.0005594509,0.0006827796,0.00010129076,0.00009838957,0.0002604466,0.000030463507,0.04816237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965155,0.0017596983,0.00016755822,0.00027004292,0.0006887224,0.0005984756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961461,0.002373846,0.0006365971,0.00024235577,0.00035332303,0.00024775622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024465094,0.0002519243,0.0005310281,0.0035519016,0.007794382,0.006046923,0.0013438251,0.0017992596,0.015721593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007536851,0.00038450057,0.00032963097,0.010060667,0.016518088,0.0040361336,0.00451946,0.0026932315,0.0011154903],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001371666,0.00012836915,0.013572503,0.00080701977,0.0000286166,0.0041992795,0.14611189,0.00046394896,0.00045306873,0.75726914,0.029655507,0.047173534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058200058,0.000080536745,0.07642422,0.0023289172,0.00007930969,0.0029089155,0.30305877,0.0003463512,0.0010112651,0.05861444,0.5550016,0.00008748061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031348694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08247673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031348694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010873216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004346901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07889104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035806552","doi":"10.1017/s000842390432010x","title":"Constitutional Politics in Canada and the United States","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Politics; State (computer science); Political science; Ideology; Law; History of the United States; Subject matter; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.0189297517105291,"score_gpt":0.2646271552839842,"score_spread":0.24569740357345507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035806552","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052473977,0.15492049,0.0008506375,0.1757612,0.0017646425,0.000038844966,0.000792226,0.00010123699,0.6132967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8269908,0.054888315,0.0013425706,0.023741264,0.00054076634,0.00005926078,0.0004419773,0.000084906984,0.09191016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945609,0.00065553235,0.00009793759,0.00036408688,0.0024508014,0.0018708294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99595827,0.00091058906,0.0001921034,0.00010894287,0.0017185971,0.0011115002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019594156,0.00033151652,0.00052666105,0.003690354,0.025409477,0.017221306,0.0014654477,0.003864382,0.005683516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00789418,0.00033093992,0.00032776018,0.009771092,0.019275581,0.0026407335,0.003258196,0.003922302,0.00038883614],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019159728,0.000018714305,0.0018448643,0.00007779237,0.000015456722,0.00019816235,0.011163234,0.00072261976,0.000109096865,0.83601636,0.1223265,0.027488062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016655307,0.000006936347,0.012429831,0.00046149574,0.000025305288,0.000077105666,0.017367035,0.00038233775,0.00014454527,0.05202237,0.91700536,0.00006100793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9946891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20884302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20884302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27807367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91762996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036099058","doi":"10.1017/s0021855305000021","title":"Constitutional dialogue in Uganda","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Constitutionalism; Constitution; Political science; Parliament; Constitutional review; Appeal; Opposition (politics); Legislature; Politics; Law; Constitutional economics; Democracy; Constitutional court; Supreme court; Constitutional law; Constitutional amendment; Judicial review; Constitutional theory","score_opus":0.02489358992016166,"score_gpt":0.28765272419929133,"score_spread":0.26275913427912967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036099058","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12812793,0.05860093,0.017022802,0.053252053,0.0016700092,0.0001772487,0.00013614932,0.00011435308,0.7408986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9601353,0.0069768894,0.0024026304,0.0027901663,0.00021442141,0.00014138466,0.000040325835,0.000038801583,0.027260125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98812217,0.007956058,0.00036545735,0.00081406016,0.001130588,0.0016115565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99370265,0.004483962,0.00050171587,0.00034600915,0.0005147098,0.0004510037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00856539,0.00038231577,0.00046318886,0.0026494889,0.026293108,0.011152298,0.0012839346,0.005510126,0.007721047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014958717,0.0005328681,0.0003243465,0.0036966042,0.029818954,0.012176771,0.012188534,0.0054442897,0.0006940538],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001136777,0.0000075121684,0.00029378038,0.00012092454,0.00000346143,0.00048885547,0.061860073,0.00018791438,0.000099266166,0.92187864,0.0031369538,0.011911293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000143230645,0.000031022024,0.0010740185,0.00073021866,0.000008420529,0.000535167,0.041897796,0.00022810261,0.00030805732,0.17246598,0.78267074,0.0000360993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017433824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016606372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026293108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020664744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010410126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14993393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036597095","doi":"10.1017/s0008423906060112","title":"Beyond the Democratic Dialogue, and Towards a Federalist One: Provincial Arguments and Supreme Court Responses in Charter Litigation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalist; Supreme court; Charter; Federalism; Political science; Constitution; Democracy; Law; Conciliation; Politics; Mediation","score_opus":0.020896433059455138,"score_gpt":0.274655875999045,"score_spread":0.25375944293958985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036597095","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22751121,0.0048478334,0.006675123,0.20094158,0.000841324,0.00009984193,0.00013376352,0.00007815993,0.55887115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829396,0.0005185295,0.0004372673,0.0074668806,0.00015214455,0.000025197021,0.000015445185,0.000014867178,0.008430051],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9727597,0.01110275,0.0007328042,0.0015500931,0.007156254,0.0066984138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97143775,0.021553498,0.001729319,0.0009052376,0.0033772525,0.0009969824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0179939,0.00027715706,0.00066436944,0.0023367384,0.02941999,0.020613266,0.0024657405,0.01470116,0.005622696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04779355,0.00042794747,0.00089387945,0.0035275142,0.023583906,0.00653579,0.0065395474,0.013315454,0.00037085492],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002650829,0.000015441741,0.0006660937,0.000023469416,0.000008401896,0.00024037332,0.013909992,0.00033082176,0.0001250896,0.9774581,0.0049305772,0.00226498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010887362,0.00006430414,0.008204916,0.0006660514,0.00012037037,0.00019023167,0.06054075,0.0060494174,0.0017006589,0.69460446,0.22754608,0.00020393587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41881314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5099729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93872416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061275814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038597535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83275074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036711705","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2009.00057.x","title":"Administration at the Supreme Court of Canada: Challenges and change in the Charter era","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Supreme court; Humanities; Law; Art","score_opus":0.0651308367324946,"score_gpt":0.28145879904214216,"score_spread":0.21632796230964757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036711705","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34476483,0.012296939,0.0039079725,0.21670721,0.0011958343,0.00018803193,0.00041019064,0.00011464516,0.4204144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9602652,0.0021069455,0.00070580596,0.008331648,0.00014112439,0.000034810648,0.00006029627,0.000035080495,0.028319083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9787167,0.0040975143,0.00035951627,0.0016718998,0.0076081445,0.0075462204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855084,0.0040168376,0.0010751137,0.0003654518,0.0058194837,0.003214797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008459486,0.000358895,0.000537911,0.0028118212,0.053416554,0.02816079,0.0033350775,0.0052857096,0.004792742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016756743,0.00054737437,0.00040924412,0.005616928,0.03393527,0.0041321507,0.004835374,0.009239589,0.00029461985],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039406365,0.00006755668,0.011019258,0.00010841304,0.000027147495,0.0012554581,0.15025276,0.0010971165,0.0004902198,0.7572979,0.043668017,0.03467682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026136666,0.000055079192,0.044729635,0.00073646527,0.000057622565,0.00021347482,0.2040598,0.0014914611,0.0006677641,0.03607366,0.71159947,0.00028947473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9915139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99461913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.720389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.279611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.363362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8355491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037359044","doi":"10.1177/1065912909352775","title":"Judicial Politicization, Ideology, and Activism at the High Courts of the United States, Canada, and Australia","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Judicial activism; Political science; Law; Voting; Judicial opinion; Judicial independence; Judicial review; Case selection; Supreme court; Politics","score_opus":0.056460416537896574,"score_gpt":0.3829438105350005,"score_spread":0.3264833939971039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037359044","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916788,0.00014452222,0.000047320285,0.00067117,0.0000059708473,0.000007214481,0.000038482347,0.0000013331048,0.0074051176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988644,0.00008005688,0.00002406473,0.000069340436,0.0000074562136,0.0000028416077,0.000032964657,0.0000013805164,0.00091744406],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979321,0.00028868543,0.000051309104,0.00015001534,0.0007474275,0.00083053956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912537,0.0015092348,0.0023790572,0.00013067125,0.0019532754,0.0027740893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015543085,0.00008164481,0.0003274675,0.0026735312,0.005034926,0.0023913386,0.00039556352,0.00048292245,0.0026273858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006983314,0.00019712448,0.00018475902,0.0023507567,0.003375953,0.00051563245,0.0015010886,0.0016465238,0.00019167495],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006536933,0.00012385333,0.96454793,0.00001827919,0.00005836641,0.00018252894,0.015671685,0.00028729008,0.00038195125,0.0072623664,0.001572867,0.009827453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004494628,0.000011772821,0.99259675,0.000013383246,0.000007537429,0.000023813911,0.0055682966,0.00018575332,0.000055532197,0.00034037794,0.0011856329,0.000006566988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7449914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9225341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25500858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011236076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011183693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51302075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038584108","doi":"10.7202/040225ar","title":"Le juge et la conservation du régime politique au Canada","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Politique et Sociétés","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06159366110445403,"score_gpt":0.3732001844441075,"score_spread":0.3116065233396535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038584108","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32592154,0.0054098065,0.0048911483,0.026944015,0.00017119046,0.000064343105,0.00023575357,0.0000704998,0.6362917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9546987,0.0011414471,0.0006690218,0.0006331007,0.000027183072,0.000013481414,0.00003278867,0.0000134938,0.04277081],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978516,0.00034408167,0.000026554777,0.0002504021,0.00073312013,0.0007942568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865144,0.00032821452,0.0001325955,0.0001215053,0.0005211154,0.0002451637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014170409,0.00015512858,0.0002615033,0.0013543493,0.013099037,0.006816881,0.00068748085,0.0010150127,0.004350791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040075784,0.00017096307,0.00017034294,0.0023625686,0.016156405,0.0012285174,0.0016316661,0.0023099817,0.00014577623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013360451,0.0000073108204,0.0027573733,0.000021716201,0.00000563633,0.000063424566,0.0069575803,0.0005379409,0.00028356333,0.97171706,0.0028308646,0.0148041025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004671666,0.000048164966,0.075221755,0.00037003518,0.000056230907,0.00014199183,0.018980835,0.0025111067,0.0013742963,0.14215444,0.7590158,0.00007867789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9645658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9846185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9098008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09019916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1266708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65444374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039981008","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2007.0014","title":"Proportionality in Canadian and German Constitutional Jurisprudence","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":222,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Proportionality (law); German; Political science; Law; Constitutional court; Constitutional law; Philosophy; Constitution; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0136201582477239,"score_gpt":0.2739484023916838,"score_spread":0.2603282441439599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039981008","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052045077,0.042232823,0.004247187,0.083598904,0.0015382542,0.00010543208,0.000625021,0.00013088877,0.81547636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88558686,0.0101509495,0.0035993098,0.017080195,0.0003346513,0.00007251685,0.00022762205,0.000076850905,0.08287111],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919487,0.0011062414,0.00020658254,0.0010490477,0.0031714,0.0025178741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973846,0.00075828034,0.000095610565,0.00014168257,0.0011517936,0.00046804568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00409101,0.0005900906,0.0004957653,0.0035778042,0.016779793,0.0107823,0.0019082422,0.004414001,0.005571964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008601036,0.00043802388,0.00043531612,0.004675545,0.022775674,0.0027283423,0.0029816024,0.004924246,0.0003865687],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075290623,0.000004511826,0.00016903832,0.000017687807,0.0000033128556,0.00004391402,0.0030489452,0.00015836261,0.00006488988,0.9807992,0.011269576,0.00441291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041004976,0.00001552057,0.008405839,0.00033888101,0.000036202087,0.00014952067,0.0059087104,0.0011306041,0.00036213725,0.19732876,0.78612113,0.0001617239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98133415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98398083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8315182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1684818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10036744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96444327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040148068","doi":"10.5235/1460728x.17.3.437","title":"Equality Rights, Freedom of Religion and the Training of Canadian Lawyers","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Scope (computer science); Law; Legal profession; Political science; Freedom of religion; Legal ethics; Legal education; Sociology; Human rights","score_opus":0.07793966976316671,"score_gpt":0.326362372260491,"score_spread":0.24842270249732426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040148068","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10596188,0.008252159,0.0016629067,0.39082122,0.0006755118,0.00009071373,0.00019156402,0.000037686186,0.4923064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9213398,0.0037151983,0.0010392623,0.03137576,0.0002022702,0.000033891603,0.000063338994,0.00002650433,0.042203926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881384,0.001618179,0.00022091037,0.00071038894,0.0037074415,0.005604688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851171,0.0047130445,0.0009043157,0.000553434,0.0041131396,0.0045989347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075545837,0.00027427523,0.00044505423,0.0021054125,0.042653974,0.011781929,0.0025340058,0.0072261994,0.0072015296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02611139,0.00043743761,0.00041711214,0.0024970316,0.04023369,0.0041277497,0.006010198,0.008258715,0.00033105887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023668039,0.00004195326,0.0036510194,0.00006126027,0.0000071959157,0.00022136602,0.03686035,0.00019924073,0.0002524261,0.8981804,0.03600011,0.024501005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006180733,0.00003730245,0.042323556,0.0008671794,0.000038515565,0.00018700205,0.07474004,0.00074436184,0.0006449799,0.14745174,0.7327075,0.00019601271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9913317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99665195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14583305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14583305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24822444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9907126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040933234","doi":"10.7202/1009893ar","title":"Francophone Minority Communities: The Last Constitutional Standard-Bearers of Trudeau’s Language Regime","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"French; Charter; Politics; Political science; Context (archaeology); Law; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Ideology; Constitutional law; Sociology; Humanities; History","score_opus":0.04065114893639541,"score_gpt":0.3271317666016708,"score_spread":0.2864806176652754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040933234","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8725466,0.0013849201,0.00065942795,0.020206345,0.000079403086,0.00003868716,0.00006529594,0.000012921812,0.1050065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932335,0.000097173724,0.00018169076,0.0010042045,0.000007953208,0.0000059015865,0.000007454637,0.0000019658257,0.0054602395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967063,0.0006813634,0.00006416815,0.00040923659,0.0008477401,0.0012912478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974585,0.0008286528,0.00020392284,0.00014663994,0.00076751044,0.0005947743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038650064,0.00014087289,0.00022802569,0.0006611928,0.020766038,0.0055550854,0.0007805125,0.0020204382,0.0016796428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005111071,0.00015950091,0.00015769273,0.0006866189,0.009310681,0.0013454362,0.0018570209,0.0022968277,0.00007153741],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103217426,0.000055693414,0.014556352,0.000030867603,0.000010118457,0.00076201116,0.06479543,0.00022995067,0.001795714,0.8806103,0.0075796507,0.029470596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015517014,0.0003222691,0.14226735,0.00039131168,0.000071565606,0.00097644073,0.14465372,0.0024439099,0.006088553,0.07161958,0.63068026,0.00032991587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8804309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9333273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9615414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03845859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04425057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2790379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041010744","doi":"10.1353/cpp.2010.0012","title":"Not Quite Supreme: The Courts and Coordinate Constitutional Interpretation (review)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitution; Supreme court; Charter; Political science; Separation of powers; Interpretation (philosophy); Bill of rights; State (computer science); Politics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021624756444227154,"score_gpt":0.29789169152102507,"score_spread":0.2762669350767979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041010744","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000024791181,0.9897022,0.000027459793,0.008278684,0.0010102883,0.0000040783557,0.000010562701,0.0000027479507,0.00093911414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008601428,0.9885514,0.000069795664,0.007363428,0.0021443986,0.000014073633,0.00003466225,0.000003514984,0.00095859455],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980883,0.00072375935,0.00019626932,0.00014199836,0.0006588331,0.00019074067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99609023,0.0019313209,0.0005012256,0.000078707686,0.0011127187,0.00028580087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023048501,0.0006742204,0.0012870322,0.0026870677,0.00080683484,0.0043959124,0.0019616298,0.0037687833,0.0075224484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008611679,0.0006415512,0.0007309295,0.0054688263,0.0030166553,0.005218212,0.0013421976,0.0048343698,0.0028007473],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003851659,0.000022522454,0.00023586758,0.010582386,0.000089758876,0.00011985319,0.00026639897,0.00011172655,0.000082913066,0.008567524,0.73670053,0.24318199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036458456,0.000023638533,0.0013364296,0.021433424,0.00006472615,0.00031417212,0.0003099149,0.000037984333,0.00003147802,0.0033708948,0.97301596,0.000024800083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018517379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052442193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018517379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046192375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011417456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03681916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042708466","doi":"10.1007/s10982-005-5881-x","title":"Civic Liberalism and the “Dialogical Model” of Judicial Review","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Philosophy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Liberalism; Philosophy of law; Epistemology; Indeterminate; Dialogical self; Distributive justice; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Sociology; Injustice; Distributive property; Political science; Classical liberalism; Law; Philosophy; Politics; Public law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03383339682363405,"score_gpt":0.2674164756806118,"score_spread":0.2335830788569777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042708466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039703514,0.003976457,0.08570299,0.15149562,0.0007453891,0.00017007947,0.00009448517,0.00011999452,0.7179915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97206813,0.0005311101,0.007233665,0.006580227,0.00081474474,0.00019184218,0.000022510427,0.00004740581,0.012510356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96811676,0.022225695,0.0007208308,0.0026527634,0.0044444366,0.0018395591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9393757,0.04428435,0.003135972,0.0063581336,0.0040819147,0.0027640618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033079557,0.00045727668,0.00096452044,0.0027159331,0.007895309,0.015756762,0.0025047995,0.009822151,0.008028565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046582032,0.0006868571,0.0007173072,0.0021352537,0.05937672,0.012345085,0.0054122494,0.010026687,0.00082193274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026322707,0.000007810222,0.000041337786,0.000008303818,0.0000026327452,0.0000056462222,0.0003924856,0.0001007406,0.000015591117,0.99807006,0.0005829295,0.00076983956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000106902235,0.0000036889396,0.00008473572,0.000013259371,0.000001920897,0.00000756559,0.00012234815,0.00025434626,0.000026529431,0.9946267,0.004844019,0.00000417272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032828553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047127297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033079557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009958368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014269661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17494345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043497408","doi":"10.1089/1533129041492141","title":"Redefining Electoral Democracy in Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Politics; Election law; Download; Law; Dual (grammatical number); Computer science; Art; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.01686674110507267,"score_gpt":0.29101642207291584,"score_spread":0.27414968096784315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043497408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6357467,0.002456953,0.0031691168,0.08675462,0.00044330276,0.00017173837,0.000711645,0.0001291666,0.27041686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9653764,0.00047312412,0.00090501603,0.0020448156,0.000036800644,0.000019904952,0.00007144872,0.000025479952,0.031047007],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99366003,0.0010280242,0.0001282883,0.00037802325,0.0016356392,0.0031700921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98956573,0.0022163633,0.00037272798,0.00044969612,0.0051219226,0.0022734483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056674085,0.00019957038,0.00055808085,0.002369271,0.019616276,0.0086853625,0.0015812869,0.002044382,0.009554227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02080774,0.00032743972,0.0004052092,0.0035168452,0.005348497,0.0017917713,0.003291077,0.0040068454,0.00029524186],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026126523,0.00012606774,0.04047507,0.00016677943,0.000073999945,0.00029630272,0.024036266,0.006335554,0.00094018324,0.7668538,0.0645807,0.09585402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002584031,0.000151001,0.20444435,0.0003520031,0.00023682321,0.0001223247,0.05710701,0.012110342,0.0031684902,0.09698939,0.62482953,0.00023039378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9939412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99848914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1572621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1572621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26680902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9774565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043543878","doi":"10.3200/socp.149.3.384-386","title":"Authoritarian Personality and Rape Sentence Length in Conservative and Liberal States","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University","funders":"","keywords":"Conservatism; Sentence; Authoritarianism; State (computer science); Psychology; Punishment (psychology); Wright; Homicide; Criminology; Social psychology; Political science; Law; Poison control; Suicide prevention; History; Mathematics; Politics; Philosophy; Medicine; Linguistics; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.04883111009689248,"score_gpt":0.37507920793558486,"score_spread":0.32624809783869235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043543878","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996449,0.000011676898,0.000011507381,0.000026098038,0.0000011770011,0.0000011539806,0.000015946505,4.6355953e-7,0.00028704436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998109,0.0000076011365,0.000010951609,0.00000824394,0.0000020669074,0.0000013182569,0.000031319352,4.521804e-7,0.00012721492],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963725,0.00015625021,0.000032360495,0.000037671743,0.000060622726,0.0000756921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99223083,0.0025237694,0.0033980985,0.00028584021,0.0004030609,0.0011583145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010104548,0.00013828745,0.00014305743,0.000783945,0.0005142493,0.0007165113,0.0001567184,0.00024471042,0.0027644944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068329936,0.0001360379,0.00028234025,0.000443701,0.00051252724,0.00032296535,0.0007705755,0.0007470175,0.00025743782],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017788328,0.0001322143,0.9955195,0.0000034718582,0.000020786598,0.00005324912,0.0015855969,0.000057557252,0.00030429498,0.00012748147,0.000060986986,0.0019568831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034328186,0.00008340326,0.9986941,0.0000029507078,0.0000057484403,0.00005223555,0.0008489821,0.00012538895,0.00005325666,0.000051125273,0.0000767676,0.0000027096617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030250666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063953614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0030250666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043050374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025343458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0092481375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044500382","doi":"10.7202/1018393ar","title":"How the Charter Has Failed Non-citizens in Canada: Reviewing Thirty Years of Supreme Court of Canada Jurisprudence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Human rights","score_opus":0.031017378010037153,"score_gpt":0.2320557403653359,"score_spread":0.20103836235529876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044500382","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2112757,0.3881095,0.0014372943,0.11752018,0.0030040594,0.00017261082,0.0010562205,0.00008521516,0.2773392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85814476,0.10437193,0.0010433504,0.017681118,0.0005906196,0.00004579749,0.00035176476,0.00010866965,0.017662028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9779449,0.0017952736,0.00076645974,0.0013997335,0.012578418,0.0055151405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.952723,0.017166022,0.0018297005,0.00080216676,0.024682581,0.0027965107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014890219,0.0005103817,0.0011032573,0.011259117,0.036556724,0.016405055,0.004237847,0.004523821,0.001887704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035549644,0.00091179245,0.00087522087,0.017621038,0.022477722,0.0034817893,0.0027576697,0.0078042424,0.00019773384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009408414,0.00009110064,0.020452997,0.0012205939,0.00015097823,0.002050307,0.12104412,0.0017404581,0.0005884747,0.5822579,0.14913912,0.121169865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020576988,0.000046790396,0.07233447,0.003248247,0.00019040814,0.00029335477,0.050474703,0.0007575311,0.0006773002,0.009566871,0.86211216,0.00027765293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99730265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99880874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.325088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.325088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3909802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7828023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044630453","doi":"10.1017/s0008423907070242","title":"Courts and Federalism: Judicial Doctrine in the United States, Australia, and Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Doctrine; Political science; Jurisprudence; Law; Separation of powers; Judicial review; Mainstream; Judicial opinion; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.034124745894655216,"score_gpt":0.3141141455929361,"score_spread":0.2799893996982809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044630453","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07028406,0.2938635,0.001592106,0.28013423,0.0010752842,0.000043489992,0.00018844857,0.000034564724,0.3527844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8752772,0.07388009,0.0014417666,0.017111832,0.0005539439,0.000042119667,0.00007796711,0.000035192905,0.031579886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.994145,0.001552345,0.00012031321,0.00025802266,0.0023476065,0.0015768181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99569774,0.0017473578,0.00026781016,0.000096022784,0.0015448065,0.00064626045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036306719,0.00026973337,0.0004996934,0.0031874292,0.013739568,0.010403114,0.0015480341,0.004847935,0.0028210378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011144881,0.0004496278,0.00031283108,0.007063421,0.019821804,0.004488474,0.003208404,0.005558693,0.00017277013],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014357827,0.000016990802,0.0016364278,0.00006049473,0.000011705806,0.00016154852,0.016204894,0.00046867924,0.00006816222,0.92558414,0.03900873,0.016763933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033455348,0.000025826239,0.0447157,0.0012717117,0.00005733229,0.00018746904,0.027049609,0.0020601032,0.00021190617,0.36821276,0.5560193,0.00015483779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96889585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9864029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91046363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.089536354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10873133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6496347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044755740","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.1.75","title":"RETHINKING THE DICEYAN DIALECTIC","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Parliamentary sovereignty; Law; Constitution; Constitutional theory; Political science; Sovereignty; Parliament; Ideology; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03223350373744688,"score_gpt":0.23427174905547754,"score_spread":0.20203824531803066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044755740","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02943203,0.017998343,0.04195763,0.23946996,0.0024195903,0.00006412612,0.00011804467,0.00008819697,0.66845214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88334906,0.007248173,0.014198308,0.03529861,0.0023235364,0.00021984299,0.000058926555,0.00021661409,0.05708688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9819666,0.009868191,0.0005806487,0.0024564455,0.003529669,0.0015984441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99029326,0.006970214,0.0003390515,0.000645932,0.0013068971,0.0004446239],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015607563,0.00076314714,0.0011978425,0.005364133,0.015147038,0.016379347,0.00236998,0.009470094,0.0041561197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017851137,0.00062942586,0.00064886065,0.003074237,0.05931312,0.019306248,0.008311171,0.011719942,0.00088307576],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002193472,0.0000013022653,0.000013104711,0.0000044326343,5.495171e-7,0.000008649228,0.0011820635,0.000024900339,0.0000064852425,0.99711144,0.0011128646,0.00053191866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015881358,0.00000780447,0.00012439539,0.00011065115,0.000004355818,0.000041449726,0.0019730423,0.0003755244,0.00012096686,0.82044107,0.17677031,0.000014437943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017501421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015417384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022955319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022955319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0115602845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16655332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045372520","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-121x.2001.tb00573.x","title":"History's living legacy: an outline of ‘modern’ historiography of the common law","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Historiography; Interpretation (philosophy); Politics; Principal (computer security); Law; Legal history; Sociology; Period (music); History; Social science; Political science; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05606189682910321,"score_gpt":0.3080389669174809,"score_spread":0.25197707008837766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045372520","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03267111,0.32448325,0.016348787,0.05643763,0.0031298273,0.00006877321,0.00024690415,0.00009573362,0.5665181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7468906,0.18147017,0.0056037656,0.0048331046,0.005076238,0.00013541577,0.00020844632,0.0001404874,0.055641703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891233,0.0006089203,0.000040273033,0.00012190281,0.00021225668,0.00010437068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988129,0.0006857725,0.00014591523,0.00011848781,0.00013762653,0.00009930551],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018108573,0.00042954285,0.0003118157,0.0048124897,0.004057013,0.00898275,0.0010314398,0.0014516652,0.004358443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026661148,0.00024343168,0.00019485549,0.0054392107,0.026304586,0.010653958,0.0027665643,0.0025904484,0.0004588377],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039526053,0.0000070592346,0.00033090025,0.00008989399,0.0000031816705,0.0000625108,0.015249214,0.00011608443,0.000042763153,0.96730316,0.0039479677,0.012843397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026114296,0.000015982763,0.0011283124,0.0006262637,0.0000037610178,0.00016368504,0.011408738,0.00013388612,0.00007025639,0.31371322,0.6727238,0.000009389001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008969901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011338166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00898275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008616293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048416564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062515914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045876479","doi":"10.1080/14662043.2013.805540","title":"The courts/parliament trade-off: Canadian attitudes on judicial influence in public policy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth and Comparative Politics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Legislature; Politics; Political science; Public opinion; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.08721519710105317,"score_gpt":0.3573992294103896,"score_spread":0.2701840323093364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045876479","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9569322,0.00028709945,0.00014452964,0.00375709,0.000016734364,0.000014926296,0.00007364069,0.0000037265918,0.038770083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99840003,0.00012844673,0.000047552447,0.00023592974,0.0000059283598,0.0000019993215,0.000024283336,0.000002249257,0.0011535619],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954652,0.0006674564,0.00013335944,0.0002772405,0.0024891943,0.0009674748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877757,0.0048806723,0.0019346699,0.00036838753,0.0035081909,0.0015323724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004904996,0.00014659557,0.00023101894,0.0024361936,0.009566504,0.0038203637,0.0005685155,0.0009578021,0.004326019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016737403,0.00019049467,0.0002694257,0.0034102371,0.0068352693,0.000902558,0.0015600637,0.0017313772,0.00013835075],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033248265,0.00022100045,0.6208678,0.00014978109,0.00008840919,0.00042332232,0.23638692,0.00069794315,0.0030899025,0.06742996,0.008222929,0.06208955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021408627,0.000050142848,0.90627426,0.00011143046,0.00003690601,0.00006609987,0.07054009,0.0005707294,0.00043539505,0.002368838,0.0194465,0.00007807722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9719149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9850181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041373182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041373182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02622836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30018485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046189652","doi":"10.7202/1008310ar","title":"La judiciarisation des relations intergouvernementales au Mexique depuis 19941","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Politique et Sociétés","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10682089959739725,"score_gpt":0.43547742411129475,"score_spread":0.3286565245138975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046189652","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7574832,0.01685113,0.0034674478,0.023585832,0.00023159556,0.00006178247,0.00010581671,0.0000360118,0.19817719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97302985,0.0015210145,0.00044385553,0.0006229382,0.00008565863,0.000027415948,0.00002995769,0.000009856656,0.024229402],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975122,0.0010534365,0.00006758663,0.00039704898,0.00032049473,0.0006492857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969959,0.0014619691,0.0007465729,0.00019452324,0.00038989275,0.0002110664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002623988,0.00023947534,0.0003192045,0.0013214798,0.010532445,0.0050274073,0.00060352037,0.0017081536,0.004839862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007297508,0.00028549944,0.00017090846,0.002163665,0.009734739,0.0018481129,0.0032200606,0.002687836,0.0002753077],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013925401,0.00003401795,0.014286668,0.00031754986,0.000035171644,0.001614016,0.13768852,0.0006375456,0.0028036174,0.77706826,0.006453515,0.05892186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004700107,0.0001663854,0.22810514,0.0005258359,0.00006888421,0.00044317148,0.055707715,0.0007528399,0.0021450554,0.039574187,0.6723945,0.0000691587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08369792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17894015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08369792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016070731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065719187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16642147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046960392","doi":"10.1163/187633711x591530","title":"Law in the Egyptian Revolt","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Middle East Law and Governance","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Authoritarianism; Rule of law; Political science; Law; Constitution; Democracy; Power (physics); Politics","score_opus":0.05892931331691813,"score_gpt":0.24265997110957402,"score_spread":0.1837306577926559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046960392","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5545614,0.026916733,0.00061056425,0.050959483,0.00017736925,0.00003420504,0.000057093745,0.000018503868,0.36666462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848246,0.0035275405,0.000092583294,0.0020214433,0.000088735476,0.000009735017,0.000012372337,0.0000058770247,0.009417115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988952,0.0004276479,0.000031698033,0.00007699615,0.00010540699,0.00046315647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920976,0.0003207965,0.0001947491,0.000049161128,0.00011681742,0.00010868403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019502308,0.00017384392,0.00018126352,0.0018069382,0.0066847024,0.008294025,0.00053225266,0.0022293811,0.0031317915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026653898,0.00019115862,0.00012500117,0.0020540191,0.020552414,0.0027813246,0.0022092033,0.0018353374,0.0002851257],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002674481,0.000044297514,0.0034308154,0.00007710733,0.0000080559985,0.00078923954,0.055793207,0.0003265846,0.00027162858,0.91485894,0.0069771344,0.017396288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004149871,0.00006886942,0.04637908,0.00078695273,0.000020697982,0.00050248945,0.24353269,0.00062839367,0.0008182378,0.20505029,0.5021226,0.000048174345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022500625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0357905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022500625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015039768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005508994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10912168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047081947","doi":"10.7202/043305ar","title":"L'État de droit et la théorie de la rule of law","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.008198615666749681,"score_gpt":0.26885991770218626,"score_spread":0.2606613020354366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047081947","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030846968,0.011272368,0.07984034,0.04624103,0.00064493075,0.000059289112,0.00020971561,0.00009602542,0.83078927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8622706,0.007451249,0.013175028,0.005275062,0.0009872275,0.00021978022,0.0001696342,0.0001810796,0.11027029],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99196506,0.0033967604,0.0002663595,0.0018857409,0.0016539276,0.00083210797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99387085,0.003649206,0.0006486901,0.0010329343,0.0005707464,0.00022758887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005146435,0.0006722974,0.000754675,0.0024001354,0.0040049907,0.011478932,0.0017871403,0.0051509026,0.013577245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007574531,0.00049983367,0.001408472,0.002428748,0.03740298,0.014414513,0.004555655,0.007399945,0.0017252367],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020979162,0.000001643487,0.000043756852,0.000008169887,0.0000013562411,0.000005592086,0.00023730921,0.00006639389,0.000010703982,0.99853635,0.00024176689,0.00084483373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011171219,0.000012708982,0.0002536007,0.00008459233,0.000006771068,0.000042564094,0.0004782624,0.00044981606,0.00010947686,0.95064926,0.04789113,0.0000105908175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008833008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005983304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013577245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007693208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005466523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05581832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050187962","doi":"10.1016/j.postcomstud.2010.10.006","title":"Authoritarian legality and informal practices: Judges, lawyers and the state in Russia and China","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communist and Post-Communist Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Principle of legality; Dilemma; China; Context (archaeology); State (computer science); Political science; Political economy; Order (exchange); Economic system; Law; Sociology; Politics; Democracy; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.03394272293597423,"score_gpt":0.3392140997298786,"score_spread":0.30527137679390437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050187962","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933269,0.00009359783,0.000089797795,0.0010065984,0.0000056657536,0.000006255928,0.0000031251536,0.0000016228506,0.0054663224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993216,0.00003360911,0.000015315607,0.000074076095,0.0000041220137,0.0000031403251,0.0000022207394,6.3630654e-7,0.00054526713],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962107,0.0017108275,0.00013271494,0.00029969387,0.00050177885,0.0011442825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99276745,0.0032402468,0.0018893507,0.00028647334,0.0005117851,0.0013048354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046154633,0.0001145347,0.0003458823,0.0016027977,0.009183614,0.005903875,0.00092090876,0.0014094689,0.0021726203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008622988,0.00020378691,0.00016052685,0.0016888406,0.017750984,0.0018938512,0.0044286093,0.0022028615,0.00010218988],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010292169,0.0002593726,0.1999453,0.00007091427,0.000032071443,0.0016124783,0.61552966,0.00064420816,0.0009426066,0.16315193,0.0014400475,0.016268464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010500025,0.0001940592,0.3547573,0.00023573282,0.000052872063,0.00028867787,0.59282905,0.0024397706,0.00070601044,0.02438625,0.02393041,0.000074887874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.081095986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14980987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.081095986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008112755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077721365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16124791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050516753","doi":"10.7202/1009064ar","title":"Le principe de proportionnalité dans une société démocratique égalitaire, pluraliste et multiculturelle","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03250964000714904,"score_gpt":0.3233638978373402,"score_spread":0.29085425783019114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050516753","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024389379,0.0044452525,0.059710234,0.03430685,0.0007237372,0.000075238495,0.00027388692,0.00013401282,0.8759415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.813464,0.002883269,0.016500216,0.007188837,0.00054834975,0.00019840838,0.0001617081,0.0001750993,0.15888019],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99618274,0.0016363402,0.00010497169,0.0007716192,0.0008228258,0.00048145073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987179,0.0003849904,0.00014499141,0.00028422562,0.0003617138,0.00010625678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027087722,0.00042854782,0.00030057537,0.0007987844,0.0052081645,0.0075213052,0.0008339054,0.002279004,0.007091696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033877075,0.00030477074,0.00061606406,0.0009427498,0.020446291,0.004368527,0.0026615683,0.004737655,0.0013487225],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031864445,0.0000021219619,0.0001061362,0.000010702593,0.0000018719497,0.000007901463,0.0012378694,0.000060629693,0.000049000904,0.9961223,0.001116509,0.0012816524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019796445,0.000027554324,0.0014585142,0.00013266222,0.00001505322,0.000119731165,0.0019168536,0.00044189708,0.0005150612,0.64071417,0.35460922,0.000029432718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030359862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04355063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030359862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071520875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008728795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060366273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051792895","doi":"10.7202/042515ar","title":"La Charte canadienne des droits et libertés et quelques leçons tirées de la Convention européenne des droits de l'homme","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Human rights; Convention; Law; Constitution; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Commission","score_opus":0.014507424605128601,"score_gpt":0.2784979156196403,"score_spread":0.2639904910145117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051792895","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0076080677,0.041869335,0.011373786,0.03882194,0.0051433817,0.0005113747,0.0046751658,0.00040519284,0.88959175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15933025,0.022039257,0.021962686,0.019925402,0.0010670297,0.00091538415,0.002698544,0.00028382454,0.7717776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913272,0.00130485,0.0003113546,0.00072444737,0.0048255217,0.0015065196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99704367,0.0006740263,0.00025231013,0.0002504863,0.0014373406,0.0003421095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042585502,0.0010666323,0.0007248379,0.003704091,0.007609369,0.012990199,0.0015450588,0.004929043,0.016740268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007696641,0.00059014035,0.0007918804,0.004867013,0.007996395,0.0029103954,0.0018848007,0.010488359,0.002786491],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020026786,0.00001925252,0.00046436643,0.00011396394,0.000008909898,0.00009946836,0.0019645663,0.00024408232,0.0004304512,0.86060625,0.11239776,0.023630789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009477694,0.00000737662,0.0021268365,0.00014319256,0.0000049028226,0.000048523325,0.0003850583,0.00005792563,0.00017077067,0.009736049,0.9872729,0.00003702555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.915546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9241407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.084454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036060665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08567153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26163965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051885556","doi":"10.7202/1013035ar","title":"From the Backroom to the Front Line: Making Constitutional History or Encounters with the Constitution: Patriation, Meech Lake, and Charlottetown","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Negotiation; Front line; Commission; Constitutional amendment; Public administration; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04472068094413539,"score_gpt":0.27718608990713883,"score_spread":0.23246540896300344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051885556","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15799463,0.012198567,0.0016277065,0.3438892,0.0016027165,0.00006115966,0.00007249638,0.00010809205,0.4824454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8956513,0.0035423168,0.00048748188,0.0150676,0.00030020144,0.000027707792,0.000026883707,0.00007297191,0.08482346],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961681,0.0014385951,0.00002370897,0.00023957477,0.0007578623,0.0013721542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814665,0.00079179544,0.00014130848,0.00006582777,0.00020494526,0.00064945495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002363234,0.0003346826,0.00029960036,0.0009590636,0.05875053,0.018243078,0.0015380724,0.0043722386,0.0063641854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062622596,0.00046402655,0.0001810286,0.0016013371,0.063499115,0.0078059044,0.0050962702,0.010488527,0.0007628447],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040870404,0.000038677725,0.0008341443,0.000032817254,0.0000034849247,0.00074888073,0.51634604,0.00006910869,0.00045014144,0.34759533,0.11600539,0.017835107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011448031,0.00001825899,0.0028139201,0.00016060166,0.0000054399948,0.00015220854,0.45899665,0.00012650354,0.0003545319,0.02337833,0.5139301,0.00005201219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7263406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8531851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9559028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044097178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027709099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55054206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053759395","doi":"10.1002/j.1538-165x.2006.tb00586.x","title":"The Canadian Supreme Court: Attitudinal Conflict in Right to Counsel Cases","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Politics; Law; Political science; Abortion; Supreme Court Decisions; Sociology","score_opus":0.02948901404579117,"score_gpt":0.3198903980472642,"score_spread":0.29040138400147303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053759395","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5761471,0.007855789,0.0005352617,0.103514075,0.0002465008,0.000089104935,0.0005509169,0.000015403552,0.31104586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98991853,0.0015291728,0.00015024167,0.0040934714,0.000051768755,0.000019036725,0.00008259159,0.0000068900504,0.004148315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99033713,0.0015861205,0.00017570949,0.00049132766,0.00464008,0.002769601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98785293,0.005245246,0.0010555944,0.00023406647,0.003303759,0.0023083913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008200966,0.000270531,0.00040912942,0.0036053858,0.026363295,0.006696285,0.0017742418,0.004067037,0.00649666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038071346,0.00037602193,0.000306997,0.0085412655,0.011882282,0.0025369471,0.0027908005,0.0048731025,0.00025149688],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028244764,0.00022868146,0.13805562,0.0001532611,0.00008486012,0.0016509084,0.120814994,0.0009928058,0.0006302261,0.57605284,0.09619785,0.06485556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001698741,0.00005992118,0.5624112,0.0006956765,0.00019805745,0.00057650404,0.17408861,0.002244742,0.0005328667,0.08036004,0.17832795,0.0003345921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98786664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99553216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11318158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11318158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.101436906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8211937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057118116","doi":"10.1017/s0008423901777943","title":"Attitudes, Precedents and Cultural Change: Explaining the Citation of Foreign Precedents by the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Charter; Politics; Convergence (economics); Law; Citation; Divergence (linguistics); Supreme Court Decisions; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.05870106828078635,"score_gpt":0.3180534359441576,"score_spread":0.2593523676633712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057118116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9666755,0.0005874354,0.00021906197,0.0035315417,0.000027064463,0.000018210485,0.00007944226,0.0000053166636,0.028856376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99840504,0.0002857905,0.00008925794,0.00014534923,0.000005110889,0.000002844448,0.000029816314,0.0000035677474,0.0010333506],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967025,0.00067278784,0.00014388446,0.00029805364,0.0014306589,0.00075205375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97766113,0.007965632,0.0038337838,0.00080825936,0.007667352,0.0020638239],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040873303,0.00013711282,0.0002900624,0.00364004,0.010176803,0.005301183,0.0013155086,0.00093150197,0.0019852822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034105916,0.00015550033,0.00021224,0.006309986,0.0066999462,0.0015002084,0.0024355887,0.0015800535,0.00011082191],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000092979935,0.00011857039,0.45501542,0.000079872225,0.00008479624,0.0016243812,0.4024463,0.0017074846,0.000720876,0.08608567,0.00514737,0.046876296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025947333,0.00004525787,0.57919616,0.00038479574,0.00010442992,0.00035765968,0.3368767,0.0039275303,0.00086086645,0.0153813595,0.062669024,0.00017031035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9665853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96928364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9465337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053466324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03567565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38792711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057735419","doi":"10.1177/0010414008329897","title":"Ideological Consistency and Attitudinal Conf lict","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Political Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Supreme court; Voting; Consistency (knowledge bases); Politics; Law; Dimension (graph theory); Political science; Voting behavior; Sociology","score_opus":0.28807225174781226,"score_gpt":0.4644727991642816,"score_spread":0.17640054741646932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057735419","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9631791,0.00011993725,0.0012774945,0.00023967291,0.000013467704,0.000025040146,0.00016894905,0.000010323527,0.034966107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993192,0.000021506254,0.00020834191,0.000019134772,0.000007743034,0.000007219821,0.00011092743,0.0000036334711,0.00030229674],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99648297,0.001113072,0.00020760762,0.00042517792,0.0013539448,0.00041712486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9728327,0.011649084,0.006623104,0.0027792545,0.004751441,0.001364449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005054518,0.00018068029,0.0002798975,0.0032979255,0.0011700073,0.0026901131,0.000466711,0.00043311302,0.004790925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0371326,0.00020675518,0.00023514434,0.0021024805,0.0024981902,0.0010966982,0.0013219607,0.00093594653,0.00037789217],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025335053,0.00026838764,0.94256616,0.00004735507,0.00016286017,0.00012235796,0.0046846913,0.00087941514,0.00084928516,0.025554955,0.0006782405,0.023932904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003145406,0.00010959257,0.9672176,0.00006469866,0.00004624881,0.00019225346,0.0058578947,0.0026432974,0.00073349103,0.020435032,0.002632429,0.000035981633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007829479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008553719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007829479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009407816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008436936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026731193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060346115","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-4469.2003.tb00835.x","title":"American Legal History in Retrospect and Prospect: Reflections on the Twenty-fifth Anniversary of Morton Horwitz's Transformation of American Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Social Inquiry","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transformation (genetics); Law; History; Political science; Chemistry","score_opus":0.06019443142625305,"score_gpt":0.3308536081956588,"score_spread":0.27065917676940576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060346115","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023896467,0.13942619,0.00023656634,0.72861356,0.011829688,0.0000089840005,0.000049735856,0.000017277012,0.09592149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6453622,0.10851008,0.0003819409,0.13863896,0.016769446,0.0000572184,0.00007328381,0.000090962225,0.09011599],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969221,0.0015069208,0.00005676618,0.00018583116,0.0007652042,0.0005631027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952173,0.002639997,0.00037931665,0.00012279603,0.0008448936,0.00079570076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046601477,0.00032588074,0.00035026408,0.002321513,0.020000095,0.013605565,0.0012919736,0.0064502596,0.003970506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011595044,0.00038948463,0.00022483229,0.003689856,0.019642694,0.007129248,0.0042625517,0.009425781,0.00058297865],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028036668,0.000043063064,0.0010405903,0.00013337206,0.0000075389316,0.000592923,0.12769976,0.00007552983,0.00014266642,0.36037633,0.48358557,0.026274504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026373891,0.0000073953593,0.0014385842,0.0003016863,0.0000028733923,0.00007020015,0.037144292,0.000017748735,0.000054826687,0.016719164,0.9442249,0.000015680987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07410572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16745129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07410572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01796774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008891897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14734876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061494529","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.1.1","title":"ONCE MORE INTO THE FRAY: CHALLENGES FOR LEGAL POSITIVISM","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Legal positivism; Morality; Epistemology; Jurisprudence; Law; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Legal realism; Legal profession","score_opus":0.028825019273952368,"score_gpt":0.2572214584636875,"score_spread":0.22839643918973512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061494529","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036789968,0.013263924,0.008398489,0.95297563,0.0017110384,0.000010937577,0.00004058253,0.000043598076,0.019876676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72894245,0.021969637,0.021964474,0.19468747,0.016133036,0.00033299034,0.00011988692,0.0002753598,0.015574582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96035236,0.025783593,0.0011011442,0.0031601202,0.007889362,0.0017133987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8935705,0.08514787,0.0023033991,0.0062161474,0.008802615,0.00395942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06906184,0.00087019574,0.0024915328,0.00381602,0.014607747,0.018721951,0.005752196,0.014834617,0.0059710257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.073806986,0.00070396706,0.0012640926,0.0026027234,0.12996113,0.029748268,0.011402327,0.035047766,0.0012915462],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000139222075,0.000020420473,0.00009226126,0.00006574621,0.000008395785,0.000033127028,0.002873528,0.0001511049,0.000024337025,0.9847356,0.008928191,0.0030533506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001568409,0.000006184409,0.000050639006,0.000093089395,0.0000018482976,0.000014603742,0.002218501,0.00024005816,0.000023225211,0.9793076,0.01802022,0.0000083204295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015551982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01546404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06906184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01739669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018387148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36523825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061848164","doi":"10.2307/840922","title":"The Forms and Limits of Constitutional Interpretation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional interpretation; Constitutional law; Law; Philosophy; Classics; Political science; Sociology; History; Linguistics","score_opus":0.044316231671212326,"score_gpt":0.35308263258337413,"score_spread":0.3087664009121618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061848164","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023256673,0.0071655493,0.032359052,0.045133505,0.0007166954,0.000058499852,0.00033502918,0.0001707655,0.8908041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9480696,0.0042400854,0.006440797,0.003575829,0.0016972581,0.00022789117,0.00026857315,0.00036531469,0.035114735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9604156,0.02220747,0.002068039,0.0035892383,0.009615198,0.0021044197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94727546,0.03483964,0.002053176,0.010306163,0.004328367,0.0011972039],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016222456,0.00044311222,0.0010106604,0.0039052109,0.007827745,0.028274167,0.0020095273,0.0061698337,0.02175979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07821646,0.0009883591,0.00072931877,0.0045262096,0.062483568,0.03693428,0.015190311,0.008944884,0.003601847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009732275,0.0000034546931,0.00013605045,0.000024641135,0.0000030972335,0.000025228848,0.0026915355,0.00005539235,0.000056849483,0.99006116,0.0026358543,0.0042970474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008101759,0.000005333825,0.00020807039,0.000121106124,0.0000059277127,0.000053299882,0.0015939092,0.0001416579,0.00008547217,0.9587926,0.038976174,0.000008349806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025211987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021588583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028274167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004964289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049381256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.085793614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062288157","doi":"10.7202/040226ar","title":"La controverse doctrinale sur la légitimité du juge constitutionnel canadien","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Politique et Sociétés","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.06252283157294539,"score_gpt":0.35901669739829073,"score_spread":0.2964938658253453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062288157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07363551,0.025897548,0.017787775,0.23238625,0.001454319,0.000050848314,0.000136345,0.00008826954,0.6485632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9684967,0.00600357,0.0021157549,0.0065572453,0.0007356562,0.0000711662,0.00003822156,0.000042417458,0.015939152],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863447,0.006888514,0.00040022016,0.0016571374,0.0033261473,0.0013832729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9768629,0.017347256,0.001098608,0.0016156272,0.0024927454,0.00058287376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01633655,0.00034664848,0.0007737432,0.0031550482,0.009487022,0.01920131,0.0023326478,0.005336643,0.005847227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034239896,0.00036563637,0.00040633598,0.003655997,0.0563515,0.00902635,0.005822904,0.012976207,0.0006787886],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002586817,0.00000250216,0.000096123506,0.000012182124,0.0000017885867,0.00001073411,0.001938331,0.00003554305,0.000016049395,0.9956696,0.0006521193,0.001562443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027036915,0.000023030772,0.0016555769,0.0005300193,0.00002240943,0.00006238207,0.0072980947,0.00041536384,0.00034990654,0.8476417,0.1419384,0.000036097084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026231376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02932897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97376865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01140409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013722268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08639693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064898042","doi":"10.1080/02722010409481209","title":"Government Use of Strategic Litigation: The Alberta Exported Gas Tax Reference","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Review of Canadian Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Political science","score_opus":0.1429663668457873,"score_gpt":0.3336447276803028,"score_spread":0.19067836083451548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064898042","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41496018,0.003071074,0.008027781,0.018631272,0.00025506236,0.0000937813,0.00010914933,0.000120608696,0.5547311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97758806,0.0009890039,0.00088501634,0.0019878524,0.00003758958,0.000016314743,0.000048083533,0.000018245213,0.018429734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899609,0.0022875615,0.0001519567,0.0006393215,0.004590649,0.0023694863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943455,0.0024879149,0.0008252477,0.00036261504,0.0015549045,0.00042379822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046999957,0.00029717857,0.00023848758,0.0020431478,0.011370497,0.009240191,0.0018687156,0.003311785,0.0034886026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010439587,0.0002760784,0.00039137283,0.003953056,0.008959408,0.003577053,0.0039182557,0.0033225513,0.00033208463],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068254456,0.00010182374,0.03261582,0.000082080194,0.00003272674,0.002335184,0.076059416,0.0019913176,0.0011713477,0.7856221,0.019886414,0.08003362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058222235,0.0002026375,0.06447476,0.00040672676,0.0001726019,0.0015278795,0.23033014,0.0076382793,0.0034495404,0.0806607,0.61085325,0.0002253228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7526562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82750404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24734378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043331817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050245646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49760085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066003064","doi":"10.1177/0010414001034010004","title":"A Tool, Not a Master","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Political Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil liberties; Globalization; Political science; Law; Human rights; Indigenous; Compliance (psychology); Law and economics; Economics; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.368946249640585,"score_gpt":0.45006990200393043,"score_spread":0.08112365236334546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066003064","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013613821,0.006129256,0.08695916,0.27861327,0.005102654,0.00021466767,0.00020139148,0.0008248896,0.60834086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44225094,0.0051746145,0.07937275,0.06383796,0.0025669807,0.00040449933,0.0002339654,0.0009513303,0.405207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98463523,0.007469689,0.0008445906,0.0024613154,0.0035653927,0.0010238657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.966133,0.014778118,0.0020998023,0.00897582,0.00460485,0.003408473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021005621,0.00049047946,0.00084151735,0.002933685,0.0077045597,0.014912548,0.0021382885,0.0051223994,0.01744237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04375926,0.00067195186,0.00063185976,0.0018689523,0.030652983,0.031615805,0.007849488,0.009038259,0.009842069],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018076262,0.00003340261,0.00088223955,0.000090587026,0.000015907686,0.000107358916,0.0064475983,0.00013284634,0.0004437808,0.91616404,0.039183788,0.03648036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015146125,0.0000654753,0.0004352581,0.0004157044,0.000013023224,0.00026233317,0.00443307,0.00031311618,0.0003894847,0.2434866,0.75014144,0.000029297673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029347257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004556181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021005621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00459546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0096359225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11108965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066171565","doi":"10.7202/042912ar","title":"À la recherche du temps perdu: la Cour suprême et l'interprétation des droits linguistiques constitutionnels dans les années 80","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitution; Interpretation (philosophy); Charter; Law; Political science; Bill of rights; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06661990094580147,"score_gpt":0.3486172626623727,"score_spread":0.2819973617165712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066171565","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12277894,0.037653834,0.0075545674,0.051730987,0.00082601194,0.000041802563,0.0001411585,0.000113049195,0.77915967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9283373,0.0040127304,0.0012554096,0.0024144917,0.00021823404,0.000031101063,0.00002745455,0.000051890867,0.063651465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973731,0.001357922,0.00005075795,0.0002513227,0.0005603926,0.00040655126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980083,0.001420621,0.00010830383,0.00009744041,0.00028653315,0.00007889339],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034349114,0.0003840152,0.00044567237,0.0013129327,0.007209286,0.007896014,0.00056035013,0.003114804,0.0040812823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007302588,0.00025566007,0.00028819402,0.001144355,0.013409109,0.0034088662,0.0017348859,0.0043274774,0.0003173932],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013635345,0.0000049040773,0.00026433196,0.000018208335,0.0000028280003,0.000110426445,0.010444209,0.00013382973,0.00012064008,0.9801154,0.0036690442,0.005102587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036806225,0.00004656765,0.005638492,0.0003395316,0.000022890108,0.00037280575,0.014750247,0.0011150021,0.0013340608,0.24482445,0.7314546,0.00006452638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24672161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24207558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7532784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016085077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008145505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49057108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067307616","doi":"10.1017/s000842390404003x","title":"The Changing Nature of Public Support for the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Institution; Public support; Political science; Politics; Democracy; Test (biology); Majority opinion; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.025834325083561864,"score_gpt":0.28534543930109324,"score_spread":0.25951111421753137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067307616","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9763207,0.0004903256,0.00010315108,0.004843351,0.000017155911,0.000012931819,0.00071537826,0.000011222552,0.01748576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983828,0.00013481396,0.000026968402,0.00010985205,0.000008498125,0.000002569854,0.00019369311,0.000002672924,0.0011381143],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728405,0.00014789941,0.00004925448,0.0002140268,0.0013308277,0.0009739403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9807906,0.0029407584,0.0036784622,0.000483527,0.008516592,0.0035899063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001492659,0.00014152602,0.00041719188,0.0029978543,0.0045588915,0.004278568,0.0010791976,0.000834926,0.0048035416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016953811,0.0002145293,0.00016611289,0.0041915583,0.002588815,0.0010953404,0.0015379552,0.0017001833,0.000213567],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029353553,0.000113383874,0.8948438,0.000078243036,0.00015127189,0.000543659,0.023356035,0.0012572332,0.0010608371,0.017196162,0.013719784,0.04738616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014015983,0.000017407858,0.9817932,0.00003682244,0.000019320521,0.000029903586,0.008409297,0.00043726453,0.00012236906,0.0004791608,0.008613002,0.000028359571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9846821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9941221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9467036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053296406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03881803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38669425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067878026","doi":"10.1111/1541-0072.00032","title":"Judicial Review of Agency Interpretation of Statutes: Deference Doctrines in Comparative Perspective","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy Studies Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Statute; Agency (philosophy); Judicial deference; Political science; Discretion; Law; Judicial review; Interpretation (philosophy); Autonomy; Judicial discretion; Statutory interpretation; Law and economics; Sociology; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12648734671166678,"score_gpt":0.46889211680343323,"score_spread":0.34240477009176645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067878026","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11173772,0.08252878,0.04998308,0.07425702,0.0022606016,0.00016105095,0.00017435079,0.00007202046,0.6788254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9727964,0.010815255,0.005208374,0.0037093032,0.0011236958,0.00007355863,0.000057195808,0.000026816851,0.00618936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96303654,0.022950275,0.001434242,0.0016312465,0.008914856,0.002032777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92234004,0.05596102,0.003825431,0.0035989324,0.013517174,0.0007573312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03297508,0.00023031734,0.00082633324,0.0060081217,0.004389987,0.0085697,0.0016296526,0.0045267767,0.003423436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10095133,0.0002792514,0.000422281,0.004903032,0.014736608,0.007864895,0.0026678261,0.0032228658,0.00024159715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017490489,0.000010345373,0.00041518363,0.000094775954,0.000010784491,0.00012133328,0.004502905,0.00029074244,0.00010722554,0.9701269,0.003618412,0.020683898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035783876,0.00007076423,0.00469279,0.0011065124,0.000044606735,0.00031232022,0.007515244,0.0014462972,0.0006321997,0.7957239,0.18836907,0.000050497918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008606645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015466007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03297508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009050533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009689748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17439097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069708965","doi":"10.1089/1533129041492123","title":"Redistricting: What the United States Can Learn from Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redistricting; Politics; Election law; Political science; Download; Law; Public administration; Computer science; World Wide Web; Democracy","score_opus":0.017019001621895898,"score_gpt":0.279834973714024,"score_spread":0.2628159720921281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069708965","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18939106,0.039036196,0.0010882615,0.42277974,0.0009941299,0.000056356617,0.0022115826,0.00006179655,0.3443809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90202326,0.021800188,0.00080736657,0.027279515,0.00034775573,0.000021400094,0.00058904814,0.00006630689,0.04706513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963827,0.00041435804,0.00007225709,0.00028761858,0.0013288477,0.0015142334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98588365,0.0032654968,0.0005546237,0.0004524685,0.008056582,0.0017871684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00355269,0.00032700048,0.0007623695,0.0024272155,0.012539516,0.010587044,0.0018086281,0.0031517253,0.011284063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016820144,0.00023512596,0.0004380784,0.006304149,0.008165246,0.0040645883,0.0019280445,0.0054670805,0.00050983083],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026600604,0.000137181,0.060606718,0.00041043598,0.00014632885,0.0005361895,0.019846207,0.0021616963,0.0003114137,0.49037695,0.2706864,0.15451455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000080771235,0.000054870743,0.103179686,0.0014556324,0.00027436108,0.00012468977,0.062161293,0.0020773069,0.00082626415,0.08961783,0.7399232,0.00022412461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99629223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.103389725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.103389725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20005961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7501485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069887854","doi":"10.7202/042321ar","title":"The Canadian Constitutional Tradition : A Brief Glimpse from an American Point of View","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Ethnology; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.013875786161759525,"score_gpt":0.2499112488208578,"score_spread":0.23603546265909828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069887854","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01726436,0.11448426,0.002125706,0.06442521,0.0021301592,0.000051560375,0.0010035245,0.00007768875,0.7984375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5186275,0.24273874,0.0048184623,0.01654836,0.0016701926,0.00013352591,0.0009359956,0.00017791819,0.21434925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996971,0.00029574276,0.000059710383,0.00022865919,0.0015146565,0.0009303294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861765,0.00029993814,0.00007957224,0.000047746784,0.0007470542,0.00020817481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014325032,0.0007057226,0.00044071383,0.006674313,0.019675214,0.009186707,0.0013705003,0.0021534571,0.007212085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027848538,0.00035995687,0.00040181933,0.015059304,0.010733547,0.0028212657,0.0016645374,0.0033944985,0.00071751437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018241602,0.000017408598,0.0017284075,0.00018387452,0.000007834317,0.00017320194,0.007906343,0.0002660208,0.00018523751,0.8933845,0.063251816,0.032877132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033389792,0.000006092566,0.005913185,0.00030040517,0.000011739339,0.00007823558,0.0037260752,0.00013537842,0.00006277881,0.011074669,0.97865784,0.00003032376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9902081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99521613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17136987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17136987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15153688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9610935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070840899","doi":"10.14296/ac.v2008i75.1175","title":"Constitutionalism: an idea whose time has come ... and gone?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Amicus Curiae","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Adjudication; Law; Political science; Legal history; Jurisprudence; Politics; Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.047329643507523673,"score_gpt":0.28578431990531883,"score_spread":0.23845467639779516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070840899","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019953776,0.09435585,0.009298188,0.59132206,0.007904277,0.000022838183,0.00013933814,0.00005279286,0.27695084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8972461,0.028512046,0.0022388066,0.034432467,0.0060582096,0.00006295058,0.000115088085,0.00012461636,0.031209666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958477,0.0024705024,0.00010996903,0.00045780424,0.0006546801,0.00045928685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99530953,0.0028535528,0.00031271868,0.00048793777,0.00051835197,0.00051787094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004942127,0.00028112746,0.0003696067,0.0013952154,0.0077499095,0.013362326,0.001055742,0.0032816476,0.005550162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011045345,0.00017597312,0.00033676333,0.0019948997,0.05168848,0.020158222,0.0039817328,0.006210135,0.00047135988],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034051293,0.0000026332682,0.00006646177,0.000021709573,0.0000014081581,0.000012948761,0.002881446,0.00002103574,0.000020398264,0.9867595,0.006429553,0.0037795177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000948132,0.000009320957,0.0002637004,0.00024045186,0.0000032279804,0.000046273166,0.008220309,0.00005208345,0.000049939546,0.7193614,0.271735,0.0000086973305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007921065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007499861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013362326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007401248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075987317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05370003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072071894","doi":"10.1017/s1049096506061014","title":"Is Canada a Westminster or Consensus Democracy? A Brief Analysis","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PS Political Science & Politics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Constitution; Federalism; Political science; Polity; Charter; Democracy; Law; Devolution (biology); Government (linguistics); Public administration; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.029293147564141964,"score_gpt":0.32308169371855144,"score_spread":0.29378854615440947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072071894","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052113663,0.016595356,0.0015386145,0.06709364,0.00033476128,0.00011657109,0.0006304271,0.000033045457,0.86154395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8661796,0.01775224,0.0015755957,0.010066373,0.00019569365,0.00009989269,0.0004330835,0.00003860123,0.10365889],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996543,0.0004678392,0.000047211455,0.000203465,0.0011466665,0.0015919219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981516,0.00039500193,0.00012258471,0.00007323471,0.0009812675,0.0002762218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010998254,0.00027123065,0.00038492307,0.002850235,0.014269339,0.0085324915,0.0011466733,0.0018630143,0.009310575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004535445,0.00015320597,0.0002540631,0.007919502,0.0054000807,0.0025625548,0.0011947362,0.0016338277,0.0005564004],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009750393,0.00000929925,0.001996038,0.000055319397,0.0000062419713,0.00017780188,0.0030987763,0.0003773774,0.000050539988,0.9544837,0.023934737,0.015800303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015545997,0.000029433055,0.03404691,0.00048920733,0.000031462052,0.00020929791,0.028323548,0.002309805,0.00017823139,0.119885705,0.81441855,0.0000623389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97451323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9825948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9275647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07243531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08634644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5255574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072321851","doi":"10.3138/cjls.27.2.169","title":"The Judicialization of Assisted Reproductive Technology Policy in Canada: Decentralization, Medicalization, and Mandatory Regulation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Decentralization; Federalism; Medicalization; Political science; Public administration; State (computer science); Reproduction; Government (linguistics); Morality; Public policy; Politics; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.013416792544901097,"score_gpt":0.2601561464215502,"score_spread":0.2467393538766491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072321851","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5845263,0.0065112785,0.0018681244,0.13387188,0.0003308842,0.00021826146,0.00053359364,0.00005965582,0.27207997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878251,0.00095782767,0.00036905525,0.0048394194,0.000060215396,0.000022737593,0.00004877401,0.000008239346,0.0058686826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98277307,0.0028032006,0.0004147934,0.0011373245,0.006564206,0.006307292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9657606,0.013010757,0.0034226857,0.0010914243,0.0130540095,0.0036605862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011238831,0.0002005803,0.0006111105,0.0022397307,0.022896025,0.008674563,0.0024648446,0.0033649828,0.0033881501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035520505,0.00039305646,0.00048334524,0.0030429733,0.014334759,0.0012687794,0.0030294806,0.0056531816,0.000115455034],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014777186,0.00016484277,0.033593036,0.00021705111,0.00009672796,0.00064614613,0.015749695,0.004131244,0.002024234,0.876527,0.03196544,0.0347368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042063705,0.00029899317,0.5511584,0.0014528325,0.00053106004,0.00038873678,0.04802958,0.012960216,0.0049936143,0.081543,0.2976503,0.00057259796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99018294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99597603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.812639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18736099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.312039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94254607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072706969","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.1.109","title":"DEMOCRATIC OBJECTIONS TO STRUCTURAL JUDICIAL REVIEW AND THE JUDICIAL ROLE IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Federalism; Law; Judicial activism; Political science; Constitution; Judicial independence; Separation of powers; Democracy; Legislature; Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Judicial interpretation; Constitutional law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.007300103575219185,"score_gpt":0.24305011294563528,"score_spread":0.2357500093704161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072706969","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03949143,0.0148005225,0.1320545,0.39121878,0.0038608455,0.00021212357,0.000071268536,0.00026822937,0.41802233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.889972,0.0046034832,0.020553995,0.055868138,0.0071647502,0.00047891133,0.000043022723,0.00013692597,0.021178821],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.929729,0.035651438,0.002941304,0.007956078,0.019233543,0.004488716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88341326,0.091198854,0.0075406185,0.009659916,0.0069501954,0.0012371468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.058066346,0.0005319615,0.0010980493,0.002127882,0.008672517,0.013613093,0.0031363443,0.014552836,0.003413616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09916698,0.0007032881,0.001435861,0.0015446609,0.050014466,0.010822338,0.007066478,0.01722342,0.00084982085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042725383,0.0000056297017,0.00006391848,0.000013270229,0.000003735124,0.000015961466,0.00040359853,0.00016926839,0.000043831096,0.9961183,0.0011400491,0.0020182554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036710157,0.000024506624,0.00018753675,0.00008970573,0.000015850032,0.000052846743,0.00013922452,0.0007449803,0.00031426834,0.9694335,0.02893994,0.00002092735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003121394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035728405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058066346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007907235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010335148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3070879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W20727553","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1019","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada and Constitutional (Equality) Baselines","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Constitution; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Formalism (music); Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional law; Scope (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.026473460672530428,"score_gpt":0.26302658507276094,"score_spread":0.23655312440023052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W20727553","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029714838,0.008420265,0.008610674,0.06870026,0.00062392256,0.000062098654,0.00078694604,0.00009117793,0.8829898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9207123,0.0027817248,0.0050025317,0.01186537,0.0003111172,0.0000769388,0.00029761708,0.00007091281,0.058881335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892998,0.0017175964,0.0002289864,0.0011797168,0.004503917,0.003069986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957671,0.0011404124,0.00020073593,0.00036675896,0.0018662771,0.00065873726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005467275,0.00035613973,0.00063472165,0.0023551167,0.020192428,0.012806369,0.001770497,0.0043520723,0.0073532355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013216471,0.0003561455,0.0005207917,0.003516347,0.026253838,0.00456539,0.003456195,0.006259157,0.0003522169],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002224996,0.0000013431162,0.00008707703,0.0000045020497,0.0000011140094,0.00001097241,0.00029436886,0.00007712368,0.000017276581,0.99504685,0.0029934002,0.0014636893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035759822,0.000012915741,0.0045299833,0.0002459046,0.000025335054,0.000053835705,0.0020488545,0.00083906663,0.00022452092,0.70301384,0.28891057,0.00005950591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94730616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96639484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8931091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1068909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12447575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77555144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073883360","doi":"10.1080/03050710701747328","title":"Change of Political Allegiance in Parliamentary Life","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament","funders":"","keywords":"Allegiance; Parliament; House of Commons; Politics; Law; Constitution; Political science; Conscience; Parliamentary sovereignty; Sociology","score_opus":0.0683611379097948,"score_gpt":0.3400177201564915,"score_spread":0.2716565822466967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073883360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59512264,0.0014073377,0.0009665962,0.011558997,0.00020023229,0.000038529382,0.000113411355,0.000021027525,0.3905713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99088496,0.00019628632,0.00012878801,0.00072122476,0.0000316965,0.000008264554,0.000019351215,0.000007686253,0.008001909],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9833528,0.005054451,0.0005437754,0.0012806287,0.005177696,0.004590681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988794,0.0037786735,0.002001208,0.0006716396,0.0033757747,0.0013786518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006415683,0.00013243199,0.00037101476,0.002261367,0.021343593,0.010827224,0.0010926125,0.0025979422,0.0035239493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02817819,0.00034278425,0.00025461407,0.0028178885,0.0301599,0.0034976688,0.004555545,0.004773754,0.00055024907],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093823815,0.00019523555,0.029667294,0.000072718445,0.000025196698,0.0004926816,0.35214612,0.00035079985,0.0018122697,0.5513894,0.0070750047,0.056679476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034002253,0.0002218503,0.3611488,0.00030584232,0.00003963327,0.0005150098,0.18652728,0.00039887227,0.002193873,0.057826698,0.39058658,0.00020150963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40989566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6270737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40989566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04113797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023848385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8150196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075506508","doi":"10.1093/pa/53.2.328","title":"The encroachment of the law on politics","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"PricewaterhouseCoopers (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.016117836920532803,"score_gpt":0.26485079145478935,"score_spread":0.24873295453425653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075506508","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029636705,0.009523531,0.0025488562,0.11828003,0.00095938734,0.000021272153,0.000051897925,0.00007348231,0.8389049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92092943,0.0051022773,0.0005494478,0.014748878,0.0016958169,0.00003929549,0.000027256543,0.00009845665,0.056809146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9843164,0.0069646575,0.000370299,0.0012523872,0.0051476574,0.0019485754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982957,0.011675038,0.0010407852,0.0019104199,0.0013588816,0.0010578338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006694966,0.00022807742,0.0004975027,0.0022154355,0.009990161,0.021967435,0.0008607703,0.008003279,0.016730633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025148433,0.00062748283,0.00038597602,0.0029671437,0.07080999,0.013138492,0.011015482,0.011909734,0.0021085136],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075389135,0.000008151275,0.00013335202,0.000018397795,0.0000030721412,0.000077426885,0.004449646,0.000042927568,0.00012411295,0.9812014,0.008983038,0.004950932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029505416,0.00002665628,0.0027854738,0.00037838513,0.000008972746,0.00020750205,0.0050185,0.00022615223,0.00036916698,0.56473565,0.4261893,0.000024723475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016482253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014509341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021967435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008285018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008006421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060112298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077417931","doi":"10.1353/cpp.2011.0015","title":"The Politics of the Charter: The Illusive Promise of Constitutional Rights (review)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Politics; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04035810089549507,"score_gpt":0.27262374017198576,"score_spread":0.2322656392764907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077417931","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000022937213,0.98762965,0.000035738198,0.009855455,0.0016097089,0.0000032470512,0.00000874542,0.0000023234927,0.00083218503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011883063,0.98220116,0.00008431502,0.010599969,0.0041216454,0.000014327203,0.000025784171,0.0000066389325,0.0017579205],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977017,0.0008987658,0.00017796879,0.00020273431,0.00086754217,0.00015131928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99459237,0.0031199844,0.0006104393,0.00012336852,0.0012455039,0.0003082327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028789078,0.0007378598,0.0013828138,0.0033400122,0.0008480808,0.0045636785,0.001422684,0.0036103532,0.005257016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008822577,0.0005205986,0.00068076386,0.0053654537,0.0040395604,0.0057139504,0.0012112977,0.005097479,0.002621734],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035686884,0.000016843536,0.00014292695,0.007252811,0.00006172206,0.000091067355,0.0002793164,0.00011653716,0.00013612118,0.013111574,0.81621605,0.16253932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017633247,0.000020784277,0.00069979497,0.014213374,0.00003769074,0.00022428531,0.00024730913,0.000052946907,0.000048473703,0.006002682,0.9784127,0.000022405196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010789176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026645977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9948357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005164352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008132155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03747022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W207812142","doi":"","title":"Les tribunaux administratifs au Canada. Procédure et preuve (Y.Ouellette).","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geology","score_opus":0.03129778592517801,"score_gpt":0.28085108076064397,"score_spread":0.24955329483546596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W207812142","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053701714,0.38123348,0.0055452394,0.1572476,0.0030683242,0.00012009055,0.0023634003,0.00030373049,0.39641652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46735469,0.062129315,0.0041177166,0.00904856,0.00060915767,0.000072513045,0.00047493874,0.00014603056,0.45604712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975102,0.00037158414,0.00008093241,0.0001811125,0.0011347957,0.00072134484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860317,0.00037946584,0.000092182854,0.000058004527,0.000699732,0.00016748127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019060476,0.0005176582,0.0003687803,0.001818176,0.014037983,0.0070157107,0.0012253176,0.0033320403,0.009241614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047413055,0.00044729453,0.00032800366,0.004514494,0.0069829905,0.0015444005,0.0012560071,0.0031738863,0.0009506938],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004229043,0.000037449063,0.0040323017,0.00017685104,0.000015379605,0.0003503189,0.016611584,0.0004372927,0.00054826675,0.6284004,0.26101536,0.08833255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002108746,0.00001580582,0.025173305,0.0004282544,0.000023580153,0.00020626659,0.008697695,0.00029673343,0.00056152174,0.017521054,0.9470054,0.000049295562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9882394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9939605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04806155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04806155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.099164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34871256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080505803","doi":"10.1089/elj.2005.4.57","title":"It's a Game that Anyone Can Play: Election Laws Around the World Louis Massicotte , André Blais , and Antoine Yoshinaka . Establishing the Rules of the Game: Election Laws in Democracies. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2004, 191 pp., $50 hardcover/$ 19.95 paperback.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.013052752536410302,"score_gpt":0.2599943451113658,"score_spread":0.24694159257495552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080505803","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011541187,0.04618408,0.00763384,0.2803474,0.003831726,0.00005316069,0.0002721652,0.00020513566,0.64993125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.629973,0.04925049,0.0047912467,0.02982195,0.0020938874,0.00022403018,0.00040052447,0.00026970753,0.28317514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990876,0.0004122586,0.000027618944,0.0000666299,0.00020650835,0.00019937994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815875,0.0011380098,0.00014136184,0.00007122797,0.00018239126,0.00030818602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017841714,0.0004089559,0.0003559381,0.00064456346,0.0062134615,0.0099839335,0.0008396559,0.0027972867,0.021871926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068267803,0.00044756324,0.0002670537,0.0011442155,0.007094779,0.011988334,0.0022697689,0.0040793796,0.0037891078],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004998778,0.000031800842,0.00039442876,0.000096893484,0.000005741551,0.000101577694,0.0050892895,0.00052085327,0.000083348044,0.5633393,0.38529587,0.044990797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037569167,0.000025230904,0.0018259626,0.00044651885,0.000014065843,0.00007046147,0.012159283,0.00072648295,0.0001668562,0.17989989,0.80458957,0.00003818384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04957061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08809842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04957061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004663097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036526013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09856415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080696380","doi":"10.1080/0098261x.2014.989791","title":"High Court Recruitment of Female Clerks: A Comparative Analysis of the U.S. Supreme Court and the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Justice System Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Economic Justice; Ideology; Law; Political science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.09533321071398417,"score_gpt":0.32172325096918397,"score_spread":0.22639004025519982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080696380","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9861921,0.0008969507,0.00009517557,0.0011366457,0.000028811433,0.000040219515,0.00052105234,0.000003808446,0.011085263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99516666,0.0006008683,0.00007638309,0.0005024251,0.00001718558,0.000013812637,0.0003732029,0.0000085173515,0.0032409609],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.994722,0.00047689624,0.00011260275,0.00044912507,0.0017076699,0.0025315997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99090403,0.0014121854,0.0017178126,0.00018459173,0.0028332341,0.0029481954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002454258,0.00022262067,0.0007009529,0.0057533523,0.009477165,0.00370442,0.001351608,0.0007908843,0.004387924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0113137495,0.00029656806,0.0002888531,0.0076448102,0.0023405387,0.00086067634,0.0022186455,0.0010972333,0.00039996675],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026216803,0.00012642377,0.8674689,0.00011702493,0.000102213184,0.0012827223,0.08150107,0.00017331622,0.0010764842,0.0062716827,0.008047007,0.033571057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006054133,0.000027316668,0.92915887,0.00007067446,0.000017702316,0.0001057295,0.061787035,0.00011614074,0.00012316198,0.00012180352,0.008446309,0.000019244162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97754115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9958449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039209682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039209682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051930528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2844875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081040206","doi":"10.5235/147293411797394397","title":"Towards a Jurisprudence of Constitutional Conventions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"BC Research (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Jurisprudence; Constitution; Law; Political science; Proposition; Enforcement; Politics; Law and economics; Constitutional law; Subject (documents); Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.055376148452998486,"score_gpt":0.2838432333722492,"score_spread":0.22846708491925072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081040206","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015500885,0.016255656,0.14318326,0.29065603,0.0030127456,0.00017923464,0.0001302628,0.00015375255,0.5309282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79996246,0.0076530837,0.092765786,0.044694602,0.005271053,0.0008429363,0.0001697778,0.00034660276,0.048293594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.966076,0.019493135,0.0012175565,0.0041681994,0.007423511,0.0016216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97155964,0.016978784,0.001715095,0.0048484784,0.0032915408,0.0016064761],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04724129,0.00087295426,0.0017761404,0.0044135335,0.009978029,0.019186858,0.004300127,0.018491201,0.0027647284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042484336,0.0011469688,0.0014618037,0.00234807,0.11002261,0.019372437,0.009566589,0.03669212,0.0011476213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.29796e-7,0.0000020912692,0.000008463844,0.000003077962,4.948514e-7,0.0000050785698,0.00033537508,0.000032181713,0.000011992148,0.99896526,0.00035377717,0.00028147947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008282182,0.0000046737023,0.00004016781,0.00003615943,0.0000013278728,0.000010955212,0.000234501,0.00015854515,0.000038601796,0.9696092,0.029852321,0.0000052490095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007262805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004511135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04724129,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012728034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01610669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24983877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081855718","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2012.00931_3.x","title":"DawnOliver<i>and</i>CarloFusaro<i>(eds)</i>, How Constitutions Change: A Comparative Study, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2011, 510 pp, hb £55.00.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Political science; Law; Constitutional law; Democracy; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.15153706500358632,"score_gpt":0.35434123078851204,"score_spread":0.20280416578492572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081855718","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00074067083,0.9162124,0.0012290308,0.019546134,0.0017716687,0.000010863052,0.0001595781,0.000036127873,0.06029361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02796953,0.88465273,0.0019696883,0.0030310797,0.001626489,0.00004626726,0.00036180133,0.00011914432,0.08022325],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801743,0.0006464867,0.000103809834,0.00025027178,0.00074613607,0.0002359113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99852943,0.00094749016,0.00017650597,0.00008769384,0.00014216616,0.00011671295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020198557,0.0008794842,0.0006737001,0.0027197034,0.0023543928,0.00754852,0.0010186606,0.002536222,0.02314678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003350272,0.00079303095,0.00039710975,0.0071450993,0.007032293,0.01017981,0.0014936215,0.0037675821,0.0056859176],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005266921,0.000038581416,0.00069152156,0.001645613,0.000024304469,0.00012831768,0.0065179863,0.00038475578,0.00029024755,0.2883154,0.4774659,0.2244447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004006503,0.000007760449,0.0009445448,0.00079424534,0.0000046666387,0.00007544347,0.0014239417,0.000031784024,0.00008902988,0.027523924,0.9690906,0.000010002784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024472611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053079944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024472611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064483467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00665165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077433705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082442523","doi":"10.1177/0010414010369075","title":"Political Competition as an Obstacle to Judicial Independence: Evidence From Russia and Ukraine","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Political Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"McGill University; Harvard University","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Politics; Ukrainian; Competition (biology); Judicial independence; Democracy; Political economy; Plaintiff; Political science; Economics; Obstacle; Law; Law and economics; Economic system","score_opus":0.14770262699880707,"score_gpt":0.44865569839099356,"score_spread":0.3009530713921865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082442523","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99635625,0.00023660486,0.00007411255,0.0001307338,0.000002250706,0.0000021539524,0.000049774368,8.4433844e-7,0.0031473017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996315,0.00011154001,0.000021629803,0.00002513105,0.0000046607,0.0000010174232,0.000060621107,8.5183456e-7,0.00014304672],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998033,0.00082969014,0.0001512662,0.00026921122,0.00043976685,0.00027713407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900232,0.0046945726,0.0034821818,0.00038166984,0.000863882,0.0005544786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002388219,0.00011816547,0.00053024257,0.0014780035,0.0014900884,0.0016494563,0.00050541153,0.0004083089,0.0019017129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008204252,0.00019139207,0.00026016883,0.001939712,0.0018852672,0.00063216157,0.0013972318,0.00062585913,0.0002494208],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048424373,0.00024073009,0.9501128,0.00017442644,0.00025906513,0.00067362125,0.013987872,0.0005013362,0.0011044411,0.010849282,0.0008616424,0.020750558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018250945,0.00009533381,0.98902225,0.00004071041,0.000063585576,0.00019232613,0.006835169,0.00027917128,0.00036855845,0.0006680207,0.0024078535,0.0000087479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026339702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040873963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026339702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011145077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012591287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052372813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083205220","doi":"10.3138/utlj.020614ra","title":"Proportionality and justification","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Legitimacy; Deliberation; Political science; Law and economics; Supreme court; Accountability; Duty; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.016665978894505853,"score_gpt":0.2422938532457298,"score_spread":0.22562787435122394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083205220","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010396018,0.034773953,0.13469058,0.12732254,0.0035713895,0.00020538329,0.00023714268,0.0001776346,0.6886254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8470102,0.010573912,0.03727277,0.03584483,0.005582531,0.0007592777,0.00019411619,0.00027246523,0.06248992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96969116,0.017122708,0.0014390508,0.0040077916,0.0057884343,0.0019508309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9797339,0.013625599,0.0013814174,0.0026846405,0.0021190108,0.00045550577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021490501,0.00086785574,0.0012174979,0.0027020269,0.005677739,0.01215807,0.002324153,0.010572683,0.009997412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03976765,0.0005898527,0.0010759993,0.0025375385,0.079247996,0.019720322,0.0071017593,0.01031669,0.0016992125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001224638,0.0000011816289,0.00001754341,0.000013228728,0.0000013905238,0.000004678758,0.00016116227,0.000027216114,0.000007437045,0.9979406,0.0008078644,0.0010164465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005647192,0.0000049669375,0.00006019755,0.00009735709,0.0000031790519,0.00002877837,0.0001291527,0.00012157399,0.00005029209,0.9572002,0.042291928,0.0000066167586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057092328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031829223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021490501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007847138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008264439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11365396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083521428","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2006.0004","title":"The Rule of Law as Liberal Justice","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Constitutionalism; Law; Constitutional law; Constitutional theory; Legitimacy; Political philosophy; Economic Justice; Rule of law; Philosophy of law; Politics; Political science; Originalism; Democracy; Constitutional economics; Law and economics; Liberal democracy; Public law; Sociology","score_opus":0.010948889504164151,"score_gpt":0.23674918367656606,"score_spread":0.2258002941724019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083521428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005862743,0.011376405,0.016223563,0.20161869,0.0030750306,0.000047246267,0.00008838627,0.000120822486,0.7615872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71644247,0.006126286,0.008202126,0.058557164,0.0046848296,0.00019283824,0.000127063,0.0002155889,0.20545164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907137,0.004264535,0.00022298454,0.0011714604,0.0025338489,0.0010934458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931722,0.003519882,0.0005162264,0.0011508862,0.0010205379,0.00062025565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00793314,0.00036816334,0.00045399796,0.0008350163,0.005402691,0.01268586,0.0011028491,0.005740544,0.0055526122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014182629,0.0003023559,0.00032083373,0.00078550726,0.04002826,0.009230849,0.0042552114,0.010711903,0.0019003458],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021203311,0.000003482392,0.000027629565,0.000005672536,6.363802e-7,0.0000071748073,0.0003001735,0.0000450467,0.000016586886,0.98969835,0.0077254097,0.0021676256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064001238,0.000005754673,0.0001072064,0.000048042013,0.000001889902,0.000018858322,0.00029207533,0.00017957459,0.00006253538,0.8641785,0.1350926,0.0000066115786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009631787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008710977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01268586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006552667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011596061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047543168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083538255","doi":"10.1089/1533129041492231","title":"Enforcing Campaign Finance Laws: What Others Can Learn from Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Campaign finance; Politics; Election law; Political science; Law; Democracy","score_opus":0.012434137966712649,"score_gpt":0.26911795579487136,"score_spread":0.2566838178281587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083538255","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17260039,0.01663394,0.0022851066,0.5090598,0.0008143017,0.00011457448,0.0016848211,0.00009611294,0.2967109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85987175,0.01347807,0.0022376652,0.039108798,0.000252805,0.000042379354,0.00052891177,0.00009606961,0.08438352],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.994391,0.00064341683,0.00013152348,0.00041324747,0.0021553326,0.0022654298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9746397,0.0066949334,0.0009376745,0.0007391284,0.013791128,0.003197456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005428274,0.00039975063,0.0007885431,0.0022746702,0.022583038,0.012212014,0.0022583136,0.004836965,0.011805119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024132697,0.00035791146,0.0005176367,0.005500623,0.00855965,0.005200714,0.0021843319,0.0068652565,0.0004931911],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001724386,0.00022499479,0.07325861,0.00046249045,0.0001737728,0.0007034182,0.03638737,0.002843086,0.0004847036,0.3901101,0.36143556,0.13374335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009346435,0.0000525349,0.0728049,0.00088844186,0.00019046897,0.00013112294,0.07853501,0.0027072998,0.0012067533,0.048808828,0.7943073,0.00027392007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9981475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8557367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14426331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30570704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99253327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083637015","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12342055","title":"Is It Time For a Coherent Political Question Doctrine in South Africa? Lessons from the United States","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Politics; Theme (computing); Political science; Political question; Law; Relation (database); Computer science","score_opus":0.07666122559971053,"score_gpt":0.3625516391955993,"score_spread":0.28589041359588874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083637015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.314225,0.056485996,0.0047597424,0.25777233,0.00066017255,0.000043572218,0.00005179636,0.000015732381,0.3659857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98376125,0.0076938365,0.0009334662,0.003920898,0.00009726355,0.000023359109,0.000009793983,0.000011648603,0.0035485516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801314,0.001085002,0.0001018327,0.00016704408,0.00022344507,0.0004095304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972837,0.0017859866,0.00028784215,0.00016970675,0.00030851606,0.00016431828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004465967,0.00018808145,0.00037366594,0.0012103975,0.0059697777,0.0056643677,0.00042423708,0.00249375,0.0030213243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007186847,0.00023821375,0.00034057916,0.0015569052,0.010442686,0.008500325,0.004518265,0.0044248877,0.00025235582],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030862793,0.000014177448,0.0009019924,0.000113791684,0.0000053918725,0.00045033154,0.029827207,0.00017091607,0.0003322122,0.94637334,0.0016381292,0.020141467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005417495,0.0000694323,0.011408042,0.0027577823,0.000049180908,0.000712879,0.09620615,0.0007925922,0.0017227284,0.52642095,0.3597422,0.00006398984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019809889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026822908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019809889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052529103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007234917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039389193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084843819","doi":"10.1086/382610","title":"Law versus the State: The Judicialization of Politics in Egypt","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Social Inquiry","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Opposition (politics); Politics; Human rights; Political science; Property rights; Constitutional court; State (computer science); Law; Law and economics; Political economy; Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.08634775081095694,"score_gpt":0.3580794609783892,"score_spread":0.27173171016743225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084843819","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5840334,0.004780248,0.004679847,0.028809827,0.00011471473,0.000040233648,0.000041382656,0.000030621228,0.3774696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957045,0.00041442103,0.00015430067,0.0005758862,0.000035735415,0.0000048411075,0.0000057471266,0.000004174649,0.0031004872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796176,0.0008641552,0.00008936,0.00020228708,0.0003383535,0.0005440692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99693465,0.0017020871,0.00059941463,0.00023858582,0.00038386526,0.0001413577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030418048,0.000103460814,0.0002498154,0.0014490755,0.006032004,0.009109413,0.00059978646,0.0018568088,0.0025391877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057285842,0.00017431266,0.00017899297,0.001705651,0.022616845,0.0031878822,0.0022765854,0.0026253734,0.00015507417],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000111808195,0.000010718375,0.0008993677,0.000029582136,0.0000034221673,0.00025128154,0.008182771,0.0002942192,0.00038820476,0.9840132,0.000826464,0.0050896043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009286639,0.00009600691,0.029275933,0.00044024808,0.00004066778,0.0006862368,0.07159442,0.0035003333,0.0032234208,0.65950435,0.23144752,0.00009789058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012561061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01797688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012561061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068718116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047904383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04985869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085449761","doi":"10.7202/042970ar","title":"Judicial Immunity from Charter Review: Myth or Reality?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Supreme court; Judicial review; Political science; Judicial independence; Qualified immunity; Statutory law; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.025408794691181288,"score_gpt":0.29539213562967065,"score_spread":0.26998334093848936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085449761","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017209016,0.009144827,0.0076532196,0.90269214,0.0017547813,0.000024474808,0.00006689148,0.00006318596,0.061391484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8033338,0.0061723506,0.0041428693,0.16612507,0.012744966,0.00022172018,0.000069396876,0.000069456924,0.007120292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9622528,0.016981116,0.0020338555,0.005487144,0.009945704,0.0032995332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90418655,0.069774695,0.008678778,0.009832417,0.004713962,0.0028135173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05127715,0.0003503429,0.0016496503,0.0021173086,0.0061725127,0.017699594,0.0042571393,0.021367094,0.0051605487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09397797,0.0005796863,0.00081617443,0.0014233908,0.08769323,0.027214136,0.008159995,0.023239922,0.00088392256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016624119,0.000024534578,0.00023453528,0.00004851661,0.00000875308,0.000043308395,0.0014062304,0.000085493084,0.0000715271,0.983603,0.008846826,0.005610791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069705915,0.00007040964,0.0006848087,0.0003950638,0.000016103782,0.0001764018,0.0018316078,0.00035180186,0.0002529822,0.92569137,0.07041443,0.000045257995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017438253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015245758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05127715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056272787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00806063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27118272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085460521","doi":"10.1080/13698230902738486","title":"Crime and criminal law reform: a theory of the legislative response","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legislator; Criminal law; Law; Political science; Public law; Law reform; Philosophy of law; Legislature; Pluralism (philosophy); Politics; Sociology; Law and economics; Legislation; Epistemology","score_opus":0.07409662880293616,"score_gpt":0.38945622318428685,"score_spread":0.3153595943813507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085460521","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026309373,0.010031585,0.038092427,0.29158565,0.0011831468,0.00020988384,0.00006899152,0.00007605195,0.6324429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92486244,0.0052647786,0.007039619,0.026474675,0.0019183218,0.0005098807,0.00004515253,0.00007689756,0.033808216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896197,0.0069148075,0.00017927351,0.0008245815,0.0014370544,0.0010245659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925679,0.0048754336,0.00078037404,0.00058757485,0.0007477436,0.00044104463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012111095,0.0004281229,0.0005835053,0.0032579326,0.0066209077,0.009353928,0.0019067734,0.010118488,0.008040874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013214743,0.00042609777,0.00097390515,0.0024503085,0.046530075,0.010160921,0.004361707,0.0067708027,0.0006437985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012799328,0.00000759135,0.000054462183,0.000012059243,0.0000016127872,0.00000984075,0.00064543675,0.00014344428,0.000012786451,0.99759847,0.00078732724,0.00072555157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022534397,0.000018652403,0.00040312257,0.00013132651,0.0000071456334,0.000033505814,0.002062437,0.0012806706,0.00008113122,0.9543291,0.041619867,0.000010566394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053383745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046715504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012111095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009602837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009798748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06967372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087400586","doi":"10.7202/1025757ar","title":"Le Parlement, les tribunaux et la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013728628744458541,"score_gpt":0.25797610979695684,"score_spread":0.2442474810524983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087400586","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037096016,0.009294025,0.007483751,0.03364996,0.000688883,0.00008738942,0.00051397894,0.00008284822,0.91110307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6275303,0.0064159054,0.00338843,0.005216169,0.00018878051,0.000085124055,0.00029130655,0.00008382167,0.35680017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972747,0.00042002965,0.000044087017,0.00036992267,0.0010465824,0.0008447011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879044,0.0002008259,0.00007160102,0.000099439356,0.00053987966,0.00029785882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012301736,0.00046730464,0.0003547663,0.0014602044,0.0136579415,0.012794993,0.0012876446,0.0024695024,0.014942741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031059168,0.0002568967,0.00030639142,0.002658972,0.017882206,0.0027335393,0.0028341908,0.0041354722,0.0012184051],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009563197,0.000003878316,0.0005276796,0.000027275717,0.0000030301667,0.000058698675,0.0046433504,0.00019696436,0.00009699803,0.97975725,0.0088425595,0.0058326647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013029129,0.000019449555,0.005998735,0.00023621759,0.000014572963,0.00010617138,0.009916833,0.00044594906,0.00027455058,0.083598815,0.89932823,0.000047486985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94048786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.959929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05951214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.055250563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08779483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40087277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087436012","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-121x.2004.tb00240.x","title":"Supreme Courts, independence and democratic agency","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Independence (probability theory); Judicial independence; Argument (complex analysis); Principal (computer security); Democracy; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Medicine; Politics","score_opus":0.043377433642921605,"score_gpt":0.3255763760675642,"score_spread":0.28219894242464255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087436012","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043988395,0.010487182,0.007359146,0.078330174,0.00055354135,0.00002840688,0.00006218957,0.00002722632,0.8591637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96149373,0.0024388784,0.00087882846,0.0056530703,0.00072277326,0.000036642534,0.000032220254,0.000021095242,0.028722858],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99077016,0.0041856407,0.00022693229,0.0010886928,0.0018695741,0.0018590434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900289,0.0061037927,0.00095572975,0.0010792766,0.0009880145,0.0008442619],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007946669,0.00028579874,0.0004578581,0.0014980535,0.009607301,0.00918735,0.000899311,0.0036488585,0.006678753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014900638,0.00028915593,0.00038740574,0.0015057485,0.03717289,0.0065128505,0.0065534525,0.0072039026,0.0007742211],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030676626,0.0000042499632,0.00009231838,0.000005858476,0.0000021193505,0.000013122646,0.0005600264,0.00005438335,0.000016622293,0.9964005,0.0014104354,0.0014373452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018234437,0.000010806822,0.00071473303,0.00006065799,0.0000055195583,0.000032217704,0.00080628775,0.00010094699,0.00009162762,0.92880106,0.06935022,0.000007655887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008236184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011306944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009607301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005692046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063051144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04202652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087764830","doi":"10.1080/13510347.2013.779255","title":"Citizenship, social rights and judicial review in regime transition: the case of Russia","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Democratization","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Social rights; Appeal; Political science; Politics; Authoritarianism; State (computer science); Petitioner; Citizenship; Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.019107308400049226,"score_gpt":0.28109405938003695,"score_spread":0.26198675097998775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087764830","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9784379,0.0006549007,0.0002740785,0.003778343,0.000028451414,0.000016664773,0.000018883411,0.000003674294,0.016787056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99878436,0.00012543508,0.000029309838,0.00022537763,0.000022065942,0.000004533728,0.0000060892066,0.000001404762,0.0008015895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930092,0.002942075,0.0002456835,0.00056728313,0.0006724045,0.0025634598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910025,0.0050327205,0.002182248,0.0003312262,0.00043519723,0.0010161867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062819556,0.00009728549,0.0004248052,0.0013983705,0.006013044,0.005230216,0.0008055891,0.0030449762,0.002525201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015875282,0.00019150999,0.00046141804,0.0014503319,0.009307638,0.0019249686,0.0032678377,0.003257081,0.00020008784],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005445985,0.00058273744,0.25146165,0.00018670116,0.00017010653,0.017318483,0.1619246,0.0029836453,0.0024157595,0.5120723,0.0071309237,0.04320848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019148935,0.0003786578,0.55113816,0.00049641775,0.00020853429,0.0036626318,0.20751004,0.00502336,0.002775978,0.12751055,0.10090285,0.0002012869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031096796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042460207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031096796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057906224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005769449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061831594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088599363","doi":"10.5860/choice.47-1667","title":"The transformation of the Supreme Court of Canada: an empirical examination","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Choice Reviews Online","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Empirical examination; Law; Transformation (genetics); Political science; History; Economics; Actuarial science","score_opus":0.07131800365419595,"score_gpt":0.3633848978290991,"score_spread":0.29206689417490317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088599363","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8800965,0.0033344883,0.00032089287,0.012744424,0.00008089754,0.00016987597,0.0010395779,0.000021625974,0.10219178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931507,0.0015973131,0.00015377229,0.0009447751,0.0000272551,0.000017849748,0.00035115378,0.000011002042,0.003746174],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98843443,0.001039617,0.00021502143,0.0008205783,0.005785386,0.0037049833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9684891,0.0075465636,0.0037816775,0.00081515405,0.014618721,0.004748763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042718877,0.00024281045,0.00054172834,0.005626273,0.026046712,0.010334515,0.0028326993,0.0018840205,0.0058329357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024321508,0.0003969799,0.000417167,0.020546656,0.013287096,0.0030926103,0.0030432483,0.0048931497,0.0003911371],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017545286,0.0005387113,0.44351733,0.00031310655,0.000107698914,0.0026675994,0.21649358,0.0014143646,0.0007747256,0.20627244,0.04565899,0.08206596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026724025,0.000060331644,0.67957157,0.00050320744,0.0000617652,0.00033703313,0.2229935,0.002122438,0.00033663676,0.004294465,0.08956949,0.00012287601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9939936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99675506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8279255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17207448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17915435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96027625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089555659","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00296.x","title":"Why Does the Federal Government Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada in Charter of Rights Cases? A Strategic Explanation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Charter; Law; Political science; Government (linguistics); Scholarship","score_opus":0.029560177383275408,"score_gpt":0.283070811602102,"score_spread":0.2535106342188266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089555659","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38593975,0.006164353,0.0060590194,0.1647258,0.00044651038,0.00026260334,0.0005496747,0.0001255128,0.4357268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878203,0.00127709,0.00041311322,0.0046579717,0.000107164495,0.000014557888,0.00006286817,0.000011888887,0.0056350627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915406,0.0011504226,0.00018839545,0.00059667917,0.0030878691,0.003436026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99037385,0.0049784826,0.0010679901,0.00028002216,0.0026894547,0.00061020243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068404237,0.00025659802,0.00040833693,0.0028983678,0.007705572,0.007478174,0.0015855219,0.0036731143,0.004218181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02539586,0.00031191442,0.0005170829,0.0042489846,0.008712888,0.0030823248,0.0015114401,0.0027742998,0.00040629608],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000546981,0.00005156574,0.025667846,0.00011097602,0.000031126296,0.00117359,0.010575539,0.0013835373,0.00028003327,0.9056685,0.032933127,0.02206944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002382775,0.00010265721,0.1334796,0.0006205377,0.00022184776,0.00078754505,0.059795428,0.010030001,0.0018258274,0.5658511,0.22683628,0.00021093985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8156984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9045175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18430161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031210212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04419464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37077397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091584033","doi":"10.7202/042658ar","title":"Constitutional Procedure for the Reform of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Humanities; Political science; Tribunal; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011940462094190188,"score_gpt":0.23176765108717548,"score_spread":0.21982718899298528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091584033","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.081371605,0.005890684,0.014287296,0.035547994,0.0010830262,0.00063705596,0.0013442137,0.00022475916,0.8596133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8799342,0.0013986338,0.008209631,0.00575668,0.00027481042,0.00025847755,0.00026167138,0.00005725212,0.103848666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914425,0.001508771,0.00029016263,0.0010769536,0.00310492,0.0025766492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99629945,0.0011092131,0.0001546043,0.00047025122,0.0016441926,0.00032221965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054251933,0.0003165609,0.00040424426,0.0021319797,0.013207302,0.009496485,0.0019269382,0.003837577,0.006260263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015795572,0.00041050892,0.0005255966,0.002605949,0.011006842,0.0016596848,0.0029033138,0.004743097,0.0004758409],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007653394,0.000004058245,0.00021709011,0.000010694153,0.0000048517413,0.000034368728,0.0009914797,0.0003969457,0.0001343021,0.98864645,0.0057521616,0.003799968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011403197,0.00005620143,0.007963533,0.00035132715,0.00011591501,0.00009505755,0.0032563428,0.0035756696,0.0019423141,0.29550278,0.68683416,0.00019266925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9316423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95993096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9188424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08115765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1563082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5888427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092340031","doi":"10.1080/02722011.2011.623234","title":"Free Votes, MPs, and Constituents: The Case of Same-Sex Marriage in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Review of Canadian Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05397172324116924,"score_gpt":0.2961896192655303,"score_spread":0.24221789602436106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092340031","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.980696,0.0002831579,0.00014618596,0.0031750405,0.00002336659,0.000039397688,0.0003081031,0.000006589467,0.015322111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99650383,0.00013305398,0.00007274033,0.00020352221,0.0000067918418,0.000007714587,0.00008100157,0.0000033492506,0.0029881143],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938665,0.0008661759,0.00012494405,0.00032398902,0.001585596,0.0032327778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99062425,0.0025802695,0.001354576,0.00033271313,0.0026047213,0.002503405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002890183,0.00022319495,0.0006236121,0.0021922062,0.018210696,0.003132116,0.0017167004,0.0013216704,0.0070713013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011651632,0.00023635702,0.0004343861,0.0056090974,0.0035502259,0.00066916965,0.0023143708,0.002177791,0.00029145036],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048227343,0.00035655507,0.7668289,0.0001374862,0.00012012362,0.0028100582,0.10441001,0.001478981,0.00097207335,0.06312768,0.012795511,0.04648037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078280296,0.000088877205,0.7563802,0.0001294976,0.00012951279,0.00029801423,0.18961358,0.0042202,0.001003916,0.0047084806,0.04320167,0.00014777234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99447507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99764097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06144238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06144238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.066984534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44579774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092436718","doi":"10.1111/0149-0508.00185","title":"Constitution‐making and the Transformation of Conflict","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Peace &amp Change","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Polity; Conflict transformation; Negotiation; Constitutionalism; Settlement (finance); Power (physics); Law; Conversation; Political science; Sociology; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.1308851059749888,"score_gpt":0.3452477600621338,"score_spread":0.214362654087145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092436718","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0590388,0.0060013207,0.021070614,0.038831864,0.0007390241,0.000120782584,0.00005637288,0.00006684041,0.8740744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97653437,0.0012392043,0.0025317257,0.0017391578,0.0001990504,0.00008674747,0.000032371754,0.000044230783,0.017593138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9856118,0.008910799,0.0004201754,0.0011442638,0.0016893954,0.002223536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99376017,0.003832379,0.0006148084,0.0008739098,0.00050249614,0.0004161222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011711313,0.0003278208,0.00048698898,0.0016553103,0.01460109,0.012820924,0.0015441328,0.003764879,0.005231015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019751552,0.0003309229,0.00042785736,0.0019854796,0.06766758,0.009149547,0.008908129,0.006178187,0.0004871784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020445575,0.0000037666073,0.00004981697,0.0000059056947,0.0000011562705,0.000035374032,0.004484695,0.00011255018,0.00002598471,0.993379,0.0004737552,0.0014259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010285026,0.000008870458,0.00021932613,0.000058275757,0.0000033615781,0.00006316863,0.004715745,0.00020733541,0.00012626409,0.9080874,0.08649021,0.000009634633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063988776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005006582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01460109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010128395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009523871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073486984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092671075","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2010.0007","title":"Language and Judgment's Reach: Reflecting on Limits on Rights","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Proportionality (law); Constitution; Supreme court; Political science; Constitutional law; Legislature; Common law; Fidelity; Bill of rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.03164118550424202,"score_gpt":0.29693485752345006,"score_spread":0.26529367201920806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092671075","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01785244,0.056582153,0.010162053,0.46718928,0.0038052988,0.000055414308,0.00009115344,0.000055641434,0.44420663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88121945,0.020927474,0.0031618422,0.04902194,0.0037285674,0.00008776339,0.000065203174,0.0001611183,0.04162677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9657219,0.015319275,0.0011177431,0.0028716037,0.0109131085,0.004056427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9706162,0.020570593,0.0008664601,0.0010603621,0.0058829817,0.0010034414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028722145,0.00056116894,0.00094636495,0.0026896617,0.016933968,0.02305477,0.0035268255,0.0085556125,0.0033320454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057235975,0.00048672446,0.0006384897,0.0020383496,0.08943899,0.02107334,0.007922699,0.012304686,0.00064640626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068942663,0.0000046481696,0.000118379845,0.000073977906,0.0000054183174,0.00012884283,0.03064768,0.0001153633,0.00009487001,0.93973887,0.019911371,0.009153868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014984612,0.000011598351,0.00053395506,0.0009213502,0.00001186362,0.00008335752,0.033394497,0.00015468292,0.00019496157,0.64902633,0.31561542,0.000037065136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22789265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21031988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22789265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033616386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049168736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45313233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093414811","doi":"10.7202/042761ar","title":"The Sovereignty of the Judiciary","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Mistake; Public interest; Sovereignty; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Judicial review; Parliamentary sovereignty; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.010582786827421762,"score_gpt":0.23657822620541205,"score_spread":0.2259954393779903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093414811","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.080464035,0.0068203155,0.011420965,0.06209722,0.00037207184,0.000021446096,0.00005113844,0.000022721173,0.8387301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97968674,0.0012746031,0.00057991943,0.0025566889,0.0002649347,0.000024147357,0.0000132540135,0.000015132834,0.015584486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914784,0.004483636,0.0003197663,0.0009981515,0.0015906827,0.0011295163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98970526,0.006379382,0.00091450696,0.0013924087,0.0009886952,0.00061985245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008689789,0.00019869885,0.0005050198,0.0011310278,0.007544466,0.009915842,0.0009934041,0.003532506,0.004685001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018969286,0.0002837835,0.0003793171,0.0012118616,0.03877245,0.006853216,0.0064466335,0.0064941826,0.00041161044],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016946789,0.0000015868497,0.000086649634,0.000004687774,0.0000011516349,0.000009667852,0.001185636,0.000035489687,0.000019907191,0.99732,0.00048358974,0.000850027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009551951,0.00001409927,0.000807735,0.000098220466,0.0000059263953,0.000042271095,0.0017729661,0.00025814888,0.00012102011,0.9489074,0.04795542,0.00000713859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0079169255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009004786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009915842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043958346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007857335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045956552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095156199","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.2914.e08","title":"Canadian Exclusion of Evidence Under Section 24(2) of the <i>Charter</i>: An Empirical Model of Judicial Discourse","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Charter; Judicial review; Majority opinion; Operationalization; Judicial opinion; Political science; Judicial activism; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.24148708468873337,"score_gpt":0.37324244996885786,"score_spread":0.1317553652801245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095156199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7594946,0.00051006366,0.020350067,0.007892546,0.00005631534,0.0006347651,0.0014340952,0.000063659434,0.20956387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98956096,0.00022310774,0.004808878,0.00021657634,0.00001835839,0.00019026357,0.00039040513,0.00001578501,0.0045756563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99191177,0.002809797,0.00038357897,0.0013188648,0.002469492,0.0011063922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9548547,0.026004164,0.0098359855,0.0023217485,0.0050830184,0.0019003872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011866443,0.00068154617,0.0008216172,0.0050996104,0.0052310866,0.0084046405,0.0025342903,0.0016434025,0.012187197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0483657,0.0006742541,0.0014921203,0.0054013357,0.010508208,0.0046267984,0.0047666957,0.003279237,0.00084711803],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002927065,0.00064417697,0.20894428,0.00018710717,0.00015928403,0.0009661125,0.059835657,0.017342344,0.0005417656,0.6724236,0.005205083,0.03345792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039054576,0.0005277829,0.30234554,0.00056635047,0.0004613675,0.0006000127,0.069472834,0.19411147,0.0007230343,0.36648923,0.06394625,0.00036563195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.58263445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42125922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97299564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027004378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026692342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.839647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096012278","doi":"","title":"Fiscal Federalism and Public Service Provision in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Devolution (biology); Section (typography); Fiscal federalism; Revenue; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Budget process; Public service; Service (business); Public finance; Federalism; Political science; Business; Economic policy; Public economics; Economics; Decentralization; Finance; Economy; Geography; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.05407290004316007,"score_gpt":0.3336257876243948,"score_spread":0.27955288758123475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096012278","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2973964,0.018321892,0.0021750955,0.050764527,0.00044742398,0.00015512362,0.0033943292,0.00018172475,0.6271634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.949094,0.0052962583,0.0009026177,0.0013142651,0.0000776231,0.0000238986,0.00049511256,0.000034998888,0.04276125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99612916,0.00025088937,0.00008994384,0.00021843029,0.0011736625,0.002137915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99658585,0.00042379615,0.00033097208,0.0001132973,0.0017034829,0.00084260595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015681119,0.0002243107,0.0004766715,0.0031590927,0.011881733,0.0057829493,0.0010975328,0.00090609293,0.008939209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071042883,0.00030207468,0.00042006918,0.0070720543,0.0047330055,0.0011957432,0.001721749,0.0016444394,0.00031619024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009621191,0.000041472278,0.024114568,0.00018365016,0.000041257517,0.00026986693,0.0050940043,0.003773826,0.00022117904,0.87626517,0.041863877,0.048034944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012139355,0.00004878823,0.27504072,0.0007426313,0.000113074966,0.00019454917,0.01132674,0.005379096,0.00050153246,0.06220954,0.644151,0.00017092121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9982146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7680836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23191641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2739261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89086807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096241879","doi":"","title":"Governance and law in transition states","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"DSpace repository (University of Tartu)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Oxford; University of Cambridge; Tartu Ülikool; Ohio State University","keywords":"Transition (genetics); Political science; Corporate governance; Law; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Chemistry","score_opus":0.0066380323277276014,"score_gpt":0.21310008562544536,"score_spread":0.20646205329771775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096241879","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56245136,0.0067346976,0.004045978,0.027705906,0.00012344867,0.00005556923,0.00039501392,0.00005486016,0.39843312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941924,0.00036931148,0.00014404276,0.00015344273,0.000013624779,0.0000110514375,0.000026257714,0.0000033548035,0.0050864886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993235,0.0003026537,0.000018612136,0.00006274981,0.00006710424,0.00022548228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900466,0.000628535,0.00010104777,0.000058299873,0.000080976264,0.00012653387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001072054,0.00008382497,0.00016421206,0.001023785,0.0015102352,0.005515812,0.00032353733,0.0010398399,0.0061981017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033959632,0.00011323394,0.00011295636,0.0017914369,0.005295928,0.0018670283,0.0012347426,0.0010840301,0.0002952424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002288683,0.000035029458,0.0020190384,0.000020505648,0.000003018025,0.000057531946,0.003659055,0.0007170144,0.0001099678,0.98243225,0.0029948317,0.007928838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032926382,0.000056714,0.025359822,0.00022508224,0.000012336871,0.00008087142,0.016424814,0.0024744505,0.0003437417,0.8808517,0.07411898,0.00001857768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019998068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026566416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019998068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040358575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032385313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03976333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096428617","doi":"10.1093/icon/moi051","title":"Parliament and the Human Rights Act: Can the JCHR help facilitate a culture of rights?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Parliamentary sovereignty; International human rights law; Reservation of rights; Fundamental rights; Political science; Law; Parliament; Linguistic rights; Bill of rights; Right to property; Convention; Legislation; Rights of Nature; State (computer science); Politics; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.017848215959071483,"score_gpt":0.28475449525102664,"score_spread":0.26690627929195515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096428617","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053546512,0.0171058,0.0020792782,0.81227285,0.004879059,0.00003753177,0.000036130215,0.000060137452,0.15817459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43346548,0.017015042,0.005622892,0.4041856,0.009793088,0.00028238146,0.00011897761,0.0002980524,0.12921841],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9448621,0.03508304,0.0017506533,0.002664484,0.008950215,0.0066894125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91032314,0.066345796,0.0060217497,0.005484652,0.0054205875,0.0064040245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040322825,0.000623653,0.0009297432,0.0020720381,0.012493311,0.031480767,0.0024120777,0.026155485,0.0129108075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09880167,0.0006160828,0.0007474341,0.0034646895,0.040282123,0.02457619,0.010410137,0.019861337,0.0035524499],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022964883,0.00003041964,0.0004039756,0.00006226913,0.0000060916727,0.00011913519,0.0054897736,0.00008776665,0.00006976898,0.92694426,0.05121732,0.015546267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004870207,0.000054391065,0.0024037608,0.00064193393,0.00002033287,0.00014683488,0.0057604522,0.0003155089,0.00022912251,0.19532786,0.7949808,0.00007036948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027678844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033806533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040322825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010398476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024463227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21325004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099367595","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-4743-2_2","title":"The Concept of the Rule of Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ius gentium","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Rule of law; Rhetorical question; Ideal (ethics); Meaning (existential); Salient; Politics; Political science; State (computer science); Law; Rhetorical device; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03579617661374124,"score_gpt":0.27617159059042073,"score_spread":0.2403754139766795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099367595","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028961727,0.017029474,0.02022094,0.013370888,0.0010680615,0.00003160306,0.00009107555,0.00004673557,0.945245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62663287,0.01999001,0.02214069,0.009945591,0.005130803,0.00035862718,0.00019921109,0.00019288251,0.3154092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975152,0.0013520739,0.00008482302,0.0003217556,0.00054854876,0.0001776432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801576,0.0014509669,0.00009796778,0.0002478929,0.00013552108,0.000051885403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028060444,0.0005929574,0.00068565045,0.0017100167,0.002649442,0.007321777,0.0013621367,0.003647378,0.00667504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040001734,0.00042544855,0.00042363108,0.001927473,0.031516034,0.0070230067,0.0013894896,0.0062798695,0.0013099555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.9740403e-7,7.970704e-7,0.0000027231235,0.0000024961182,2.5183948e-7,0.0000016814543,0.00008936382,0.000012416957,0.0000052345213,0.99847275,0.0008463,0.00056570285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019251142,0.000002146584,0.000026195527,0.00002531624,9.98498e-7,0.000013865753,0.00009468413,0.00008019042,0.000028239128,0.95222414,0.04750018,0.0000021520816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004560041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004341195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007321777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003423117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033798087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02483654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W210173211","doi":"","title":"The Unwritten Constitution and the Rule of Law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Opposition (politics); Constitution; Political science; Legitimacy; Duty; Rule of law; Legal positivism; Judicial review; Argument (complex analysis); Democracy; Public law; Philosophy of law; Politics","score_opus":0.015495677701411931,"score_gpt":0.24715142364706025,"score_spread":0.2316557459456483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W210173211","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08880534,0.014832227,0.0123235425,0.07527514,0.0005455711,0.000045669527,0.00011548568,0.00003734896,0.80801976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97565484,0.0019898345,0.0014057367,0.0026045695,0.00029185976,0.000025286809,0.000031785017,0.000015081425,0.017981078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942274,0.0023745962,0.00015196936,0.00091020635,0.0013447232,0.0009911311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99511635,0.0027511893,0.00054000714,0.0006670965,0.0005796847,0.00034563718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050224676,0.00020572553,0.00042674656,0.0012179565,0.005677077,0.009270672,0.00092972146,0.003008306,0.0032108221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009149132,0.00027140757,0.00022079049,0.0013085316,0.07327158,0.0038270168,0.002810347,0.004794214,0.00040212108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011372732,0.0000015746454,0.000064224085,0.0000040817495,5.586834e-7,0.000010897388,0.00074211287,0.00004082265,0.000019146224,0.99813664,0.00037773905,0.00060113345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020230606,0.000011268128,0.0011338221,0.00007161273,0.0000054815537,0.000040203486,0.0014359638,0.00018542062,0.000093534574,0.92696935,0.0700236,0.000009487068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07963142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.072983675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07963142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01293549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011993815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1583358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101827679","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x13000471","title":"Niqabs in Canadian Courts:<i>R v NS</i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Plaintiff; Supreme court; Subject (documents); Law; Test (biology); Trial court; Political science; Face (sociological concept); Psychology; Questions and answers; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.015699070106776854,"score_gpt":0.2675490999569741,"score_spread":0.2518500298501973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101827679","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1946021,0.008865215,0.0016461565,0.15039276,0.0016000245,0.00032962213,0.0010825658,0.00013291964,0.6413486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8416745,0.0036236783,0.0017244846,0.043912943,0.00024828804,0.000083601684,0.0002738048,0.00005707254,0.10840158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868253,0.001272734,0.0003628058,0.0011495596,0.0048423912,0.005547216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98899007,0.002160689,0.00042918976,0.00033498762,0.0060638697,0.0020211646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072304225,0.0005489151,0.00049203954,0.002444477,0.03533746,0.0100122085,0.0028895028,0.008778764,0.0085929725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019594107,0.0007841401,0.00077447644,0.0031564718,0.011123367,0.0022537657,0.0035230068,0.008112322,0.00061528775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013284125,0.00008503429,0.02108062,0.0003056624,0.00007477931,0.002505067,0.036900442,0.0007615772,0.0018350327,0.7144863,0.18723279,0.03459992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010810639,0.00011819624,0.0929043,0.00076979055,0.00023738279,0.0006788414,0.046614256,0.0023041414,0.0020136705,0.030839937,0.8229331,0.0004783596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99657464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99871075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17637813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17637813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24102297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9552846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102281821","doi":"10.1017/s0008423907071156","title":"Judicial Decision Making In the Supreme Court of Canada: Updating the Personal Attribute Model","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Voting; Political science; Law; Politics; Civil liberties; Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04421095861280156,"score_gpt":0.31964519533576125,"score_spread":0.2754342367229597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102281821","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9748785,0.00078682456,0.0070048133,0.0023527953,0.000043927757,0.000083833875,0.0012508609,0.00003681007,0.0135617005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99641305,0.00018364069,0.0015583375,0.00008864054,0.000015412306,0.000010314063,0.00038198833,0.00000817097,0.001340409],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99708325,0.0009564811,0.00011170975,0.00062565116,0.0006594746,0.0005634371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.976445,0.014949682,0.0025721663,0.0015024627,0.0029955234,0.0015352648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067748097,0.00032123987,0.00065179664,0.0020045673,0.0029032307,0.0057113394,0.0016642308,0.00095398835,0.004427222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029905286,0.0002999848,0.00095823925,0.003799432,0.0026902745,0.002342691,0.0013448949,0.0025158871,0.00040940213],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005485147,0.00025825284,0.73714995,0.00017712064,0.00052913715,0.0006028948,0.0061875917,0.122103855,0.00038788447,0.06279104,0.006691339,0.062572524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010525146,0.000113251044,0.41572335,0.00018452117,0.00033504493,0.0002285564,0.0060617705,0.4864044,0.00037380026,0.07484296,0.015433091,0.00019406545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8976249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9034391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9829254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017074576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012271841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20595592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102413032","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2010.00112.x","title":"Standards of judicial review of administrative bodies: The consideration of citizen participation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Appeal; Political science; Bureaucracy; Standard of review; Judicial review; Consistency (knowledge bases); Public participation; Legislation; Judicial opinion; Quality (philosophy); Law; Judicial deference; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.07056674159199602,"score_gpt":0.3802773077074847,"score_spread":0.30971056611548864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102413032","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36543748,0.008112323,0.05346886,0.060181275,0.00061357225,0.001241435,0.0004412194,0.00016856399,0.51033527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98915064,0.0003735504,0.0036137789,0.0009995798,0.000117206815,0.000098404416,0.000030917145,0.00001682052,0.005599146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.80845815,0.0861633,0.010676721,0.010813779,0.0711323,0.012755757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6306505,0.17645591,0.03160137,0.027776008,0.12509453,0.008421621],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12331059,0.00028567613,0.0009255872,0.0054749735,0.012486206,0.019214308,0.003916226,0.003901944,0.002888132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2554318,0.00070464064,0.0006293395,0.0057506636,0.019627716,0.004673506,0.00493244,0.004239974,0.00029399892],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007320667,0.00007214776,0.031720784,0.00037370864,0.00009290684,0.00030424393,0.035298154,0.0013519168,0.00090309716,0.869074,0.0102477,0.05048821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018376854,0.0003945909,0.20933574,0.0030024578,0.00048068378,0.0008935163,0.035928924,0.010170429,0.005750854,0.41348067,0.3198759,0.0005024187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41659093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5606139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5834091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05633476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13089927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8283322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105286613","doi":"10.7202/1000629ar","title":"Witnessing Arbitrariness: Roncarelli v. Duplessis Fifty Years On","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Principle of legality; Normative; Politics; Law; Sociology; Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; History; Linguistics","score_opus":0.08032181496622609,"score_gpt":0.2892118379418761,"score_spread":0.20889002297565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105286613","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.109823026,0.014294878,0.0020092244,0.20046948,0.0011551603,0.0000943717,0.0001579639,0.0000726829,0.67192316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8763194,0.0032842767,0.0005204039,0.05652784,0.0005452977,0.00006128836,0.000049404356,0.00004710498,0.062644884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924064,0.0016703312,0.00012321118,0.001012154,0.002003125,0.0027848613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967397,0.0018948076,0.00020648175,0.00022197979,0.0005960918,0.00034093412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073996475,0.00037072838,0.00059950957,0.0011720267,0.026823698,0.008195891,0.0027758952,0.012450674,0.003901933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012952939,0.00048825023,0.0005930549,0.0011069587,0.018354198,0.004851074,0.004144968,0.016285174,0.0004048109],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036866157,0.000021536756,0.0014135316,0.000025981386,0.000010133312,0.0009896489,0.021146996,0.00010340483,0.00026561486,0.9246611,0.04348014,0.007845064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006910641,0.000075858734,0.0067485357,0.0005833075,0.00009687706,0.0006356883,0.015787276,0.0008133928,0.0016079732,0.1311269,0.8422222,0.00023286874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.74122447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7930165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25877553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032363687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027160425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.520599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105317282","doi":"10.1017/s0008423905040655","title":"Strategic Leadership and Political Change on the Canadian Supreme Court: Analyzing the Transition to Chief Justice","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Dissent; Political science; Politics; Economic Justice; Position (finance); Relevance (law); Sociology; Law; Humanities; Law and economics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.15608409676281135,"score_gpt":0.32394545354427234,"score_spread":0.167861356781461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105317282","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9887892,0.00011514672,0.00019050339,0.00073190214,0.000010442792,0.000022595852,0.00028595462,0.000005463463,0.009848717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99744046,0.00007002452,0.00009910382,0.000058282298,0.0000035681403,0.0000056609324,0.0001624767,0.000002130447,0.0021582209],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853075,0.00014321662,0.0000244243,0.00014330434,0.00064606644,0.0005121433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962992,0.0005634071,0.0005261026,0.00007307746,0.0016675936,0.00087059464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00111815,0.00019475147,0.000271052,0.0016970146,0.0046725455,0.0021822583,0.0011515432,0.0006031966,0.004419811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068241134,0.00012929998,0.0003428233,0.002809056,0.0020285896,0.00059244875,0.0012276213,0.0013127832,0.00023498184],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011808926,0.00013931724,0.91656846,0.00006731168,0.000072071365,0.00053028896,0.025489045,0.0031997373,0.0010610301,0.014870782,0.0057708947,0.032112915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004472322,0.000024338713,0.96666646,0.000028485194,0.000016638925,0.000029870253,0.023426704,0.0028399576,0.00020603361,0.000613115,0.006116276,0.000027609216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99253297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99613744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0500128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0500128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04088348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36286992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105860024","doi":"","title":"What Judges Think of the Quality of Legal Representation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Quality (philosophy); Legal profession; Political science; Scope (computer science); Situated; Perception; Legal practice; Law; Practice of law; State (computer science); Legal education; Psychology; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06806131948915473,"score_gpt":0.39414375241371985,"score_spread":0.3260824329245651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105860024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7913842,0.0059797424,0.006281241,0.08258996,0.00049820635,0.000049035632,0.0001262293,0.00007005105,0.11302126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99602413,0.00070273894,0.000496967,0.0015996506,0.000104965286,0.0000065870554,0.000026166752,0.000010752033,0.0010279984],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97120947,0.016085533,0.0013900684,0.001222223,0.0077275904,0.002365213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9517701,0.023989324,0.009255369,0.0018390418,0.008034222,0.0051118955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01597487,0.00018508697,0.00045727188,0.0029936132,0.0035396097,0.010506704,0.0008396439,0.002526554,0.0027224815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.089345284,0.00034843764,0.00043379812,0.0018331488,0.011690062,0.0044615995,0.002568045,0.0022769526,0.0005456097],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022466709,0.00015478,0.27300838,0.00039628102,0.00018504022,0.0010006519,0.46111035,0.0007955965,0.0046983687,0.08138211,0.029765137,0.14727865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000769152,0.00037046408,0.25000447,0.0013503854,0.00013244737,0.0014571513,0.53237796,0.0013934021,0.0013210281,0.085354544,0.12585777,0.00030349504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009642168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011636591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01597487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032946216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026172441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08448416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107408700","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1267","title":"Furthering Substantive Equality Through Administrative Law: Charter Values in Education","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Obligation; Law; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Political science; Realm; Administrative law; Context (archaeology); Constitutional law; Sociology","score_opus":0.10517733094963949,"score_gpt":0.3927593526776382,"score_spread":0.2875820217279987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107408700","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033717263,0.007060407,0.11867658,0.1643942,0.0010007919,0.00015997872,0.000043666736,0.00013734041,0.6748097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94112885,0.0029299161,0.026258353,0.009438976,0.00036045304,0.00011041044,0.000024378112,0.00006259787,0.019686127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9790509,0.012291062,0.0005163069,0.00081278005,0.0044335504,0.0028953298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9815555,0.012081751,0.0012265178,0.0013631867,0.0023252156,0.0014478633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022026347,0.00047082998,0.0005174986,0.002549195,0.015364633,0.021798724,0.0023516817,0.0052679987,0.0034090134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023589402,0.0003467949,0.00049063895,0.0026387363,0.092846476,0.015722131,0.011010092,0.011309061,0.00046900712],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001794548,0.000005670738,0.00009029813,0.000011146722,5.999295e-7,0.000025103956,0.005604665,0.00009557251,0.000017901235,0.9883454,0.00091228157,0.0048896596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010935988,0.00002298548,0.00071864773,0.0003192519,0.000006369617,0.00005504089,0.011704336,0.000709217,0.00032948627,0.8581143,0.12797134,0.000038033577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13187376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18782638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13187376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032521397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047382258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26221234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107459657","doi":"10.4337/9781784719135.00010","title":"Constitutional dialogue and judicial supremacy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Legislature; Negotiation; Judicial review; Constitutional economics; Law; Constitutional review; Democracy; Constitutional law; Power (physics); Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.037557049989383404,"score_gpt":0.26855989544263026,"score_spread":0.23100284545324684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107459657","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022464119,0.025191657,0.0090663545,0.018035738,0.00042757273,0.000030545925,0.000033389468,0.000042758147,0.92470783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94151175,0.00807767,0.0018640793,0.0027669345,0.0006159272,0.00006257909,0.000044453245,0.000044757573,0.04501188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995249,0.0027359675,0.000117330484,0.00044742672,0.0008420761,0.0006082154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953035,0.0036068235,0.000227284,0.00029247816,0.00040813212,0.00016169949],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046156915,0.0002719269,0.00039800853,0.0012852271,0.006060879,0.0075267996,0.0011720764,0.00248207,0.0067871767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008685604,0.00020865658,0.00028814867,0.0015831843,0.02452935,0.005840047,0.004625224,0.0045733866,0.0006112183],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019399179,0.0000039081797,0.00002748939,0.000013917574,6.1676127e-7,0.000015237114,0.0023836019,0.00006864026,0.000035659617,0.9938332,0.00090690434,0.002708823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016225149,0.000017177508,0.0003364288,0.00031167173,0.0000053242875,0.00005784337,0.0036911073,0.00028757242,0.00027486082,0.7847105,0.21028116,0.000010107963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006203681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004751877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075267996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061059077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057390854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04430175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107815919","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-4469.2000.tb00152.x","title":"The Political Origins of Judicial Empowerment through Constitutionalization: Lessons from Four Constitutional Revolutions","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Social Inquiry","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":172,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Impartiality; Hegemony; Political science; Political economy; Power (physics); Empowerment; Law; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.10323040596705237,"score_gpt":0.38327742759781197,"score_spread":0.2800470216307596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107815919","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5169313,0.0028733304,0.009283224,0.026452148,0.00011477712,0.00009817108,0.000046478817,0.000049502072,0.444151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956267,0.00042259097,0.0007615257,0.0004316551,0.000047214133,0.000021824922,0.000009874841,0.000010822765,0.0026678534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966935,0.0015607195,0.00008344554,0.00028097627,0.00041683836,0.00096464227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99073595,0.0063511576,0.00094530673,0.0010223183,0.00048720377,0.00045802814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048795138,0.00018079263,0.00031388985,0.0015213782,0.00560801,0.005584197,0.000878237,0.0019567301,0.003598761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011934484,0.00020462004,0.00038285958,0.0011724946,0.0437747,0.0069911284,0.0056422427,0.0048343167,0.00017801856],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016959873,0.000026894768,0.00071442634,0.000011585412,0.0000015474005,0.000084844185,0.007142336,0.00013703654,0.00006694059,0.98614734,0.00030090837,0.0053491225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008611885,0.00007096141,0.0075371875,0.00010573552,0.00001283798,0.00019766961,0.014281642,0.0011934971,0.00091115554,0.92649347,0.049078934,0.000030832154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045437515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066020917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057909186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057909186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038470966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042016268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108214397","doi":"10.1093/jla/2.1.227","title":"The Easy Core Case for Judicial Review","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal Analysis","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Judicial review; Grievance; Law and economics; Duty; Law; Political science; Judicial activism; Democracy; Economics; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03900316758973471,"score_gpt":0.35479657623184324,"score_spread":0.31579340864210853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108214397","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020087322,0.008594867,0.034990754,0.39302215,0.0034863164,0.00020070784,0.000097294236,0.000087133354,0.5394335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7927149,0.004784659,0.013639075,0.105059676,0.009772757,0.0007086849,0.00008323067,0.00017664584,0.07306035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96516746,0.015450477,0.0011435698,0.0040208343,0.010135376,0.0040823314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9485855,0.033664975,0.0029869194,0.0051280553,0.007011397,0.0026231864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030095363,0.0003984443,0.0011072261,0.002474921,0.0074287313,0.013808183,0.0021770762,0.01576853,0.008633401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09189839,0.0005552076,0.0007774612,0.0011070627,0.024520958,0.017431937,0.007865212,0.015043265,0.0018686417],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006250518,0.000006054178,0.00006495386,0.000016456255,0.0000026824855,0.000043743752,0.00020759778,0.000045990273,0.000027870925,0.9911219,0.006171782,0.0022846956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004977873,0.00001729656,0.0001902412,0.0002256724,0.000008463994,0.00012738034,0.00029274254,0.00045075658,0.00015380746,0.8757037,0.12276045,0.0000197577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00294797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002442242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030095363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006729246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012114719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15916145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109204083","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781107300361.009","title":"Constitutions as Coordinating Devices","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.03249528065059652,"score_gpt":0.24388192782478826,"score_spread":0.21138664717419176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109204083","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014376611,0.0034016685,0.06413613,0.0073530995,0.00032932032,0.00010445451,0.00011068722,0.00015443384,0.9100335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8584831,0.0036453423,0.030941514,0.0021302833,0.00091888104,0.0007566446,0.0002512826,0.00032357182,0.102549456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941865,0.003056008,0.00030794446,0.0010849895,0.0008400276,0.00052451104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99647516,0.0019840836,0.00029065344,0.00085347425,0.00026887178,0.00012780746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057043196,0.00056997634,0.0006618683,0.0018786918,0.004591636,0.010720422,0.0014434136,0.0036695735,0.00941588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009402271,0.00068745465,0.0007577455,0.0022803925,0.03326565,0.013815366,0.004352252,0.004729359,0.0017032414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.094851e-7,5.6548674e-7,0.000005778784,0.00000173208,4.1829725e-7,0.0000014991433,0.000093662115,0.00004961958,0.0000063081447,0.99937576,0.00015840409,0.00030584596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056508716,0.000001841007,0.000029746994,0.00001163723,0.0000019752702,0.000004696328,0.00009584131,0.00019095998,0.00005005982,0.9837986,0.015806595,0.0000022968277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003742358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002550226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010720422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005276802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043562707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03828603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110221353","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2167","title":"Panel selection on high courts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Panel data; Allocative efficiency; Political science; Law; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.04291580922159556,"score_gpt":0.2478318461141811,"score_spread":0.20491603689258553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110221353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7938952,0.0015688699,0.022514768,0.0076547908,0.00012639971,0.00033154426,0.0039781122,0.00016289606,0.16976744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98986256,0.0002393728,0.0009980565,0.00047543918,0.00005567052,0.00006383101,0.0004527447,0.000018756673,0.007833473],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854547,0.0061826776,0.00034117527,0.0020636697,0.0025316807,0.0034261614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9486122,0.03023395,0.009121404,0.004623106,0.003938376,0.0034710155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008838821,0.00027620269,0.0008524672,0.00116745,0.0024850103,0.0035430472,0.0015247624,0.0018378086,0.024995241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053797655,0.00035381955,0.00067494396,0.0023836337,0.004053235,0.0022268104,0.002499034,0.0025752343,0.0017488418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008350322,0.0003013668,0.5127907,0.00025788136,0.00032548592,0.0011896756,0.004866433,0.060371723,0.001471364,0.268411,0.030300638,0.118878774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018839311,0.0003537424,0.73031545,0.0003572123,0.00021912876,0.0002700589,0.0055049947,0.042686056,0.0015986344,0.16692998,0.051419936,0.00015638398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12644781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18145882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12644781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009075924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043956223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2514236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110772694","doi":"10.1017/s0008423900000214","title":"Two Forms of Democracy: A Response to Mendelsohn's “PublicBrokerage: Constitutional Reform and the Accommodation of Mass Publics”","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Plea; Representative democracy; Constitution; Separation of powers; Direct democracy; Government (linguistics); Political science; Publics; Liberal democracy; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021072243214037088,"score_gpt":0.30223744736878744,"score_spread":0.2811652041547503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110772694","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048446762,0.00479601,0.0024695527,0.9239533,0.0021448142,0.000022691731,0.000029890876,0.000027001943,0.061712094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5325801,0.0059129833,0.00515563,0.36157396,0.005761469,0.00025678286,0.00005688076,0.00017177044,0.088530436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866961,0.006383152,0.00032133242,0.0017767497,0.0029638885,0.0018588189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898392,0.006294483,0.00053590984,0.0007984149,0.0014961518,0.0010358106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014587671,0.0006994278,0.00075492304,0.0016309432,0.014071074,0.011386449,0.0027124844,0.02350102,0.0053364863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027689336,0.00048683767,0.0009306445,0.001960075,0.049434744,0.014351053,0.008351047,0.021696316,0.00046780714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017421195,0.000010595419,0.00006966856,0.000015349697,0.0000016119753,0.00005158393,0.0041168006,0.00006376937,0.000041772702,0.9574653,0.035316575,0.002829553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009035766,0.000022128868,0.00047465146,0.00021306663,0.000008302965,0.00011543725,0.005221335,0.00039685817,0.0002936665,0.4624568,0.5306538,0.000053596188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.091888495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1541095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9081115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026232863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01905148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1903336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111632808","doi":"10.1017/s0008423913000681","title":"Does Patronage Matter? Connecting Influences on Judicial Appointments with Judicial Decision Making","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Nomination; Scrutiny; Political science; Humanities; Appeal; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01567210068210743,"score_gpt":0.29630805499646445,"score_spread":0.280635954314357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111632808","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.946141,0.00043899816,0.0007556746,0.0026240805,0.00005644414,0.00006362226,0.000086629225,0.00001061656,0.049822934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99759185,0.00010837082,0.000120485245,0.00011088999,0.000033076394,0.0000085685815,0.000015243543,0.0000059523572,0.0020056025],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98929965,0.005139824,0.00042717688,0.00078583043,0.0023770465,0.0019704397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94550186,0.033904422,0.010263148,0.0011838959,0.0045497166,0.0045969333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006798971,0.00012844212,0.00035551586,0.0013262067,0.0036082459,0.0039941273,0.0006425786,0.0008968594,0.01141517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048858795,0.00025917456,0.0003130268,0.0015650928,0.0030065305,0.0010475867,0.0014017599,0.0012829351,0.00081707555],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008534914,0.00056976394,0.87305725,0.00019777905,0.00016997522,0.000977778,0.03899206,0.0012232324,0.0024108696,0.028813416,0.0034375829,0.049296856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036890193,0.0001549104,0.97469157,0.00009775492,0.000050042116,0.000106378444,0.010286476,0.0008262026,0.00036760024,0.004914475,0.008437725,0.000029836094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08392787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1936994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91607213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006779797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006919168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1668787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111831069","doi":"10.1017/s0008423907071338","title":"The Constitution of Law: Legality in a Time of Emergency","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Law; Constitution; Constitutionalism; Political science; Rule of law; Injustice; Opposition (politics); Prime minister; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.0364610590709913,"score_gpt":0.3370556872032805,"score_spread":0.3005946281322892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111831069","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010014151,0.16860515,0.014843943,0.32631096,0.0038949922,0.000059633883,0.00024213691,0.000106218395,0.47592282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75548744,0.06499322,0.0060700774,0.03181558,0.004517334,0.00016774923,0.00020966075,0.00018080609,0.1365581],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978713,0.0009902581,0.00009671403,0.00020268312,0.00049468706,0.00034428734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981179,0.0012071433,0.00018853578,0.00014860384,0.00017019181,0.00016758933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002851257,0.0003519709,0.00031106093,0.0008861143,0.0039730677,0.0086441,0.00093481736,0.0048579336,0.0061056213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006121008,0.00047429965,0.000238928,0.0013809438,0.027226372,0.012377307,0.0029254574,0.0052646114,0.00084996974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034078153,0.0000039875836,0.000044290722,0.000018652507,0.0000011972907,0.000038073216,0.0022419712,0.000077105884,0.00003269648,0.96853864,0.026029665,0.0029701928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007936042,0.0000065196596,0.00035622658,0.00023235471,0.0000025287313,0.0001068695,0.0033543422,0.000111177265,0.00008598974,0.4797578,0.51596534,0.000012930205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010778129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011816973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99429494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005705069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007133688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0413934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111989169","doi":"10.1177/0964663907073444","title":"Framing Same-sex Marriage in Canada and the United States: Goodridge, Halpern and The National Boundaries of Political Discourse","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Lesbian; Politics; Sociology; Law; Statutory law; Gender studies; Human rights; Social movement; Political science; Homosexuality; Law reform","score_opus":0.027103830454355292,"score_gpt":0.33742894756400327,"score_spread":0.310325117109648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111989169","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3412382,0.031426113,0.0023369712,0.2622983,0.0009792057,0.000096585434,0.00026491986,0.000052886615,0.3613068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736406,0.0050730715,0.00059358246,0.008997775,0.00008548064,0.000030717292,0.00004278255,0.00002269942,0.011513281],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934243,0.0016429819,0.00011122958,0.0004966178,0.0020999995,0.0022248887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99165606,0.0034185825,0.0004321192,0.00020199936,0.002864881,0.0014264062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061945603,0.0004214425,0.0005992174,0.0037574193,0.05987772,0.016457435,0.0024846487,0.0043329354,0.0030181576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011936351,0.00044325652,0.0003982275,0.0058668177,0.043916285,0.003821948,0.004822922,0.0072649023,0.00016103077],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003276562,0.000035992514,0.007403054,0.000079658326,0.000017440201,0.00039132097,0.25643283,0.0004659126,0.00022089065,0.6907965,0.024572976,0.019550625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003343528,0.000022045737,0.027130665,0.00089681766,0.000091002745,0.00012164675,0.53965914,0.0008911685,0.0006056326,0.064363606,0.3660085,0.00017632259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9974946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99873346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27703363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.27703363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3024086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8385385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112265333","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1035","title":"Positive Obligations Under Sections 15 and 7 of the Charter: A Comment On Gosselin V. Québec","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Supreme court; Charter; Legitimacy; Political science; Entitlement (fair division); Jurisprudence; Law; Minor (academic); Law and economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.036374362089767215,"score_gpt":0.3042601532688276,"score_spread":0.2678857911790604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112265333","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018787676,0.016068058,0.0010193728,0.7956412,0.0067086136,0.00026676638,0.0012942881,0.00017790921,0.16003618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14703055,0.005723878,0.0009323287,0.7475704,0.003047676,0.0002048869,0.00024243184,0.00012248504,0.09512537],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868466,0.002483898,0.0005108857,0.0013176096,0.0049254014,0.0039154883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799872,0.011661615,0.0006480745,0.00045837773,0.005978036,0.0012668369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0153507395,0.00095355307,0.0011853002,0.0016947308,0.028432693,0.009246898,0.0069777146,0.03854565,0.0061650346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023661442,0.001264012,0.0017017502,0.0026304652,0.010537093,0.002462617,0.0019700872,0.024648039,0.0009700518],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012352924,0.00004475614,0.0024635887,0.00022712834,0.000045317323,0.0017921017,0.0073734373,0.00067389803,0.0007539646,0.19288373,0.78646034,0.00715819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014319472,0.00005848281,0.01067645,0.00075580645,0.0001732952,0.0002652915,0.005103042,0.0011117872,0.0009532682,0.0157097,0.9647007,0.0003489237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9838747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99249774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.100920886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.100920886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16532408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73223567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W211475630","doi":"","title":"State Action is Always Present","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social contract; Democracy; Law; Constitution; Law and economics; Political science; State (computer science); Liberal democracy; Tort; Sociology; Politics; Liability","score_opus":0.05852217317198346,"score_gpt":0.3253231613675265,"score_spread":0.26680098819554304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W211475630","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009474849,0.0016919804,0.011180882,0.06899477,0.0023576375,0.000041926145,0.00015889145,0.00019947384,0.9058995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57607716,0.0018707997,0.0047856923,0.026629748,0.0012781706,0.0001891862,0.0002998668,0.0002552245,0.38861418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99463767,0.0016025698,0.00017887585,0.0015322674,0.0010949984,0.00095352833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99735224,0.0008090313,0.00020531268,0.0006116664,0.00055514363,0.00046656255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045079114,0.00042317275,0.0006683742,0.0005881705,0.008178436,0.009438344,0.0012482615,0.0060517024,0.0490119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006758999,0.00039342983,0.00073139986,0.00061330496,0.012477988,0.01083572,0.007207133,0.00882133,0.008984406],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008562396,0.000010261537,0.00021089641,0.00003084919,0.00000678758,0.000095735966,0.0023100926,0.00004648353,0.00013766694,0.9750744,0.013957294,0.008110989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001128577,0.000023831828,0.00036164213,0.0002200009,0.000021448597,0.0001807796,0.002398598,0.00022236971,0.00048157346,0.36675525,0.6292922,0.000031004973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004709193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005962414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0490119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004197675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064409613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16396117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116515736","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1185","title":"Charter Decisions in the McLachlin Era: Consensus and Ideology at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Political science; Adjudication; Law; Ideology; Voting; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Politics","score_opus":0.040883193096728776,"score_gpt":0.3069758374462566,"score_spread":0.26609264434952784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116515736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9191111,0.0031140142,0.00029387156,0.017212143,0.00009720623,0.00002344051,0.00030800412,0.000009548436,0.059830766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957585,0.0004475465,0.00006482514,0.00040369,0.000017026221,0.0000027440562,0.00004577184,0.000003850615,0.0032560152],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945874,0.000580378,0.00006872532,0.00041050717,0.0022465198,0.0021063397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905522,0.0022649767,0.0011648786,0.00021086921,0.0040711476,0.0017358992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004035093,0.00011540846,0.00044446235,0.0029038247,0.017726067,0.0063090795,0.0013052201,0.0014540027,0.0034173797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017269138,0.00021072185,0.00027376917,0.005710408,0.006360122,0.0013869321,0.0016675299,0.0025780604,0.00018460951],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041677576,0.00021952142,0.39434505,0.00018524124,0.00021963166,0.0010799479,0.18988891,0.0034675924,0.0014956945,0.22579151,0.05695579,0.12593433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004736287,0.00008203489,0.8084637,0.0002606449,0.00010355268,0.00008451506,0.09248838,0.0022894018,0.00080525444,0.009146213,0.08605219,0.00017681385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9942794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99778146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1234294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1234294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09221158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8955472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117191932","doi":"10.1177/1468795x09102123","title":"Max Weber's Sociology of Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Classical Sociology","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Discernment; Rationalization (economics); Law; Bureaucracy; Casuistry; Sociology of law; Economic Justice; Epistemology; Social science; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.0396939773552259,"score_gpt":0.34710465131623236,"score_spread":0.30741067396100646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117191932","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008291281,0.14619896,0.031068657,0.05639061,0.002613421,0.00009169781,0.0004756646,0.00016305174,0.7547067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6278671,0.132059,0.026464822,0.011993136,0.007805344,0.0003855542,0.0003021814,0.0001773122,0.19294566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984296,0.0006251859,0.000084648374,0.00025875313,0.00042586838,0.00017596834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987619,0.00076297653,0.00012013955,0.00009925556,0.00012752495,0.00012820808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021316856,0.00076990895,0.0005632586,0.0029024153,0.0031587365,0.0057489546,0.00061596604,0.0021661578,0.004328955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035047755,0.00036529548,0.0003764376,0.002317073,0.016035406,0.006940373,0.0020707904,0.0026914403,0.0012837705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027536078,0.0000032678265,0.000039528433,0.00002404023,0.0000010591509,0.000017996339,0.0005352457,0.00010442929,0.000030361654,0.9882407,0.006523119,0.0044773985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003279964,0.000005866941,0.0001628863,0.00012491964,0.0000014398992,0.00003741975,0.00018850488,0.00014526727,0.000035301327,0.82510734,0.17418124,0.000006602296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004029746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026167962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057489546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004419152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033609378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032063305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118309261","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v1n2p47","title":"Neo-Liberal Constitutionalism: Ideology, Government and the Rule of Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Liberalism; Ideology; Classical liberalism; Law; Liberal democracy; Politics; Law and economics; Rule of law; Doctrine; Political science; Limited government; Constitutional law; Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.023434594125997032,"score_gpt":0.2764229958505291,"score_spread":0.2529884017245321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118309261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06453617,0.02905982,0.058778577,0.1179443,0.0012720451,0.000050489634,0.000087743654,0.00007985783,0.728191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97755563,0.0040254886,0.004041905,0.0035019377,0.0006240483,0.00005313042,0.000030978998,0.000028244278,0.010138713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946936,0.0028886409,0.00013560004,0.0004505947,0.0012333443,0.0005982503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99565804,0.0027657202,0.00038648356,0.0004928199,0.00040831856,0.00028868814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006651631,0.00022235488,0.00039361182,0.0013921527,0.0038546862,0.008503183,0.0008091619,0.0023913407,0.0020174445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008562843,0.00019207138,0.00031085018,0.0016717209,0.03742605,0.005975122,0.0026317653,0.0036077744,0.0002782951],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012148986,0.0000019183706,0.00004204363,0.0000043527984,7.044603e-7,0.000007937175,0.0004218831,0.0000739605,0.0000119649185,0.9981199,0.00035486565,0.0009591791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037730192,0.0000032705495,0.00012087931,0.000039444996,0.0000012032103,0.000013045433,0.00031989734,0.00019698287,0.000031494936,0.97774637,0.021520415,0.000003202621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036554986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026040967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008503183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053680777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043735635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038948357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118390776","doi":"10.1017/als.2013.9","title":"The Trial of Li Zhuang: Chinese Lawyers’ Collective Action against Populism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Wisconsin-Madison; Styrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete; American Bar Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Populism; Ideology; Legitimacy; Political science; Politics; Solidarity; Law; Accountability; Collective action; Autonomy; China; Legalism (Western philosophy); Mobilization; Public administration","score_opus":0.024852095963881472,"score_gpt":0.3081719559403569,"score_spread":0.2833198599764754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118390776","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8382131,0.00077980047,0.0013753234,0.06337995,0.00042811868,0.00012935286,0.000015746911,0.00003428863,0.095644385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98907125,0.00006382976,0.000118493204,0.003001882,0.00008189559,0.000025228588,0.000003257934,0.0000044063117,0.0076296153],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99012417,0.0037983123,0.00021883576,0.0010608656,0.0015141371,0.0032836983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914213,0.004131136,0.0009702034,0.00073054404,0.0008661058,0.0018807302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0130961705,0.00042562583,0.0005453424,0.0016325474,0.037454482,0.009748193,0.0018383038,0.0076265857,0.006093962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013645503,0.00038227733,0.000423078,0.0015101483,0.027704345,0.0031486826,0.011127888,0.008595171,0.00034670052],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016143834,0.00017721068,0.025089202,0.00013890177,0.00008368948,0.0067022336,0.5483662,0.0004262523,0.002751377,0.3648477,0.024581397,0.026674444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021887898,0.0002605094,0.03614576,0.00043005662,0.00020139795,0.0006468203,0.49814355,0.0035185092,0.004198367,0.093233466,0.3627838,0.00021885081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0369065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06324274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037454482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014019727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0144262165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10172069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119094321","doi":"10.1353/gso.2005.0015","title":"Reconsidering the Rule of Law: Reflections on Power, Politics, and Partisan Gerrymandering","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Good Society","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Gerrymandering; Rule of law; Redistricting; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Legislature; Law and economics; Due process; Public law; Constitutionalism; Politics; Private law; Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.14884785290208205,"score_gpt":0.34176169364824255,"score_spread":0.1929138407461605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119094321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17574316,0.018111628,0.021588398,0.16237263,0.0014267407,0.0000414549,0.000029284198,0.000042002925,0.6206447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9765489,0.0014312365,0.0009428615,0.008531678,0.0006312027,0.00001843366,0.000005915037,0.000033492342,0.011856263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99206865,0.0040679695,0.00013187807,0.00093754835,0.0012441861,0.0015498868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943098,0.004496284,0.00026046328,0.00036890572,0.00031552176,0.0002490585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007995162,0.00035432586,0.00051973865,0.0016074704,0.012890478,0.015114912,0.001758489,0.0072848243,0.0028836164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005611617,0.00048775828,0.00056072226,0.0010424758,0.053432003,0.009995086,0.0052246023,0.011074238,0.00036987494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032538155,0.0000070696447,0.00010516861,0.000005714993,0.0000014456052,0.00008041372,0.010468211,0.00012684062,0.00004425225,0.9865161,0.0009944633,0.0016470228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009086128,0.00001976113,0.00044006293,0.00008087812,0.000004652155,0.00006621117,0.009912599,0.00068078766,0.00029017843,0.900697,0.08777771,0.000021111058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015846863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019625258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015846863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012935246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00444184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09385222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119203085","doi":"10.1017/s0008423909090039","title":"The Unanimous Decisions of the Supreme Court of Canada as a Test of the Attitudinal Model","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unanimity; Supreme court; Voting; Test (biology); Perspective (graphical); Law; Political science; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03291715511497402,"score_gpt":0.2934792108388698,"score_spread":0.2605620557238958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119203085","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87843585,0.00033648935,0.0011633149,0.0063116467,0.000059909482,0.00011423575,0.00029872236,0.000008064519,0.11327177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979563,0.00008203914,0.0001561884,0.00023359124,0.00000831352,0.000012256511,0.00004014442,0.0000015454552,0.001509724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897175,0.0024264732,0.00022486142,0.0007970684,0.004078072,0.0027560203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9722383,0.013803677,0.003248031,0.0010433681,0.007715685,0.0019509906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008574271,0.00022610494,0.00038479356,0.0015424936,0.009995043,0.0058636623,0.0013572244,0.0012017179,0.006000631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038889445,0.00015197376,0.00033420467,0.0024817667,0.010088234,0.0018970248,0.0019790442,0.002642741,0.00021713288],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032443472,0.00038128937,0.41212133,0.00016779012,0.00013285676,0.0006660216,0.058969907,0.0057092644,0.00061260985,0.47274834,0.011334687,0.03683149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000109074725,0.00025891277,0.6793972,0.00044763344,0.00016945427,0.00014031997,0.17356156,0.020892924,0.0011440241,0.07997727,0.043677207,0.00022440031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9499134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95705366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050086617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042795878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044694763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3105073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119533214","doi":"10.1017/s1744552309990309","title":"‘Receiving’ the Swiss Civil Code: translating authority in early republican Turkey","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Promulgation; Civil code; Turkish; Ideology; Political science; Code (set theory); Law; Scholarship; Democracy; Modernization theory; Sociology; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.03847833127912919,"score_gpt":0.34042990501536435,"score_spread":0.30195157373623516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119533214","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9070973,0.00087479566,0.00042754103,0.0033323935,0.00008832553,0.000019933046,0.00003289564,0.000024406783,0.08810239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952454,0.00010986469,0.00010832677,0.00020096378,0.0000060420393,0.0000041160556,0.000013403635,0.000012515158,0.004299369],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981589,0.0007304562,0.00007994397,0.00019010763,0.00032177503,0.00051880005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877316,0.0003934279,0.00017708426,0.00008688105,0.00043990667,0.0001295113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027471923,0.00038172855,0.00025472042,0.0009674107,0.006795111,0.004273543,0.00068268017,0.0016457393,0.0027721676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031119934,0.00029085134,0.0001992365,0.0009534204,0.008348531,0.0018218965,0.0020760964,0.0023116064,0.0007425266],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002588886,0.00010607069,0.014221116,0.00014776879,0.000009746668,0.0048531108,0.40659255,0.0011154428,0.0023044639,0.5116552,0.009560002,0.049175594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000096569,0.00050624,0.095217615,0.0007499093,0.000042652453,0.0025097218,0.4296469,0.0033159684,0.006463273,0.02026837,0.44095793,0.00022482147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08509637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11653763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08509637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017558826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008649762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16920209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120367809","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2347528","title":"The Manual of Official Procedure of the Government of Canada: An Expose","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"EXPOSE; Government (linguistics); Political science; Business","score_opus":0.012778608951360746,"score_gpt":0.23123096397455653,"score_spread":0.2184523550231958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120367809","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011477556,0.018030277,0.023328958,0.06857475,0.0030876843,0.00044451244,0.0037334124,0.0008477328,0.8704752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40249467,0.018382335,0.04229162,0.02917906,0.002060495,0.00077334733,0.0023015847,0.0013642837,0.5011526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9791956,0.0023562403,0.0007633028,0.0012719906,0.013529015,0.0028838261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873104,0.0033595944,0.00028957397,0.0010802706,0.0075420616,0.00041808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008006906,0.00068986235,0.00074687443,0.0061107106,0.017958622,0.016683796,0.0032905561,0.0064618974,0.007784889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01995264,0.0010656838,0.00069281296,0.009782005,0.019010352,0.0040457537,0.002060398,0.008726369,0.001528516],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000449729,0.000007555514,0.00021217049,0.000035273602,0.0000032786354,0.000024952024,0.0020428977,0.00021434725,0.000072625655,0.92505085,0.061331276,0.011000324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009202708,0.000008728826,0.004273274,0.00036174248,0.000017756352,0.000055491702,0.0022811356,0.00071800814,0.00039105653,0.07087781,0.9209229,0.00008282382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9862148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9839813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8609795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13902052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28401735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99861413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120920000","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Conventions and Parliament","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Constitution; House of Commons; Law; Political science; Statutory law; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.036499002040341094,"score_gpt":0.30258961116596556,"score_spread":0.26609060912562443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120920000","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011626432,0.04966389,0.008000325,0.062348347,0.0014102532,0.00010948505,0.00023995059,0.00010816308,0.8664931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8458985,0.031369347,0.006146062,0.015167042,0.0013411611,0.0001598278,0.00030781273,0.00016426433,0.09944598],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97253746,0.011782609,0.0011123483,0.0023010166,0.008774909,0.0034916329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98511976,0.0068367743,0.00126691,0.0016801422,0.004312046,0.0007844652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016555909,0.0003709958,0.00065276737,0.0035337515,0.013110422,0.011666573,0.0019125921,0.0030885688,0.0061889705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031918902,0.00035028477,0.0003089018,0.006017353,0.04157592,0.004830858,0.0029417595,0.005131187,0.0008350676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017823739,0.0000011499665,0.00007113098,0.000030004992,0.0000021980054,0.000014923861,0.0017114609,0.00007763303,0.000024044155,0.9886718,0.0045242026,0.0048697013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012252092,0.0000075941152,0.0017946846,0.00039604076,0.000009498848,0.000051184496,0.0024116978,0.00013338114,0.00011369071,0.30524293,0.6897968,0.000030196778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.508577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48819813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95693576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043064233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051078856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9886342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121312343","doi":"10.1111/j.0023-9216.2004.00057.x","title":"Judicial Power in Russia: Through the Prism of Administrative Justice","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Adjudication; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Impartiality; Principle of legality; State (computer science); Discretion; Power (physics); Exclusive jurisdiction; Judicial independence; Judicial review; Original jurisdiction; Supreme court","score_opus":0.07481347722011512,"score_gpt":0.3828701922453495,"score_spread":0.3080567150252344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121312343","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3447082,0.051495783,0.012894542,0.035172507,0.00048700513,0.00006892423,0.000066298446,0.00006556593,0.55504113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926751,0.0033885548,0.0004405315,0.00052113755,0.00017549323,0.000012910764,0.000007817984,0.0000040499103,0.0027744442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908778,0.0054452997,0.0003413239,0.000553947,0.0017789464,0.0010026166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912594,0.0052723736,0.0013988509,0.00039349459,0.0011742174,0.0005016623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006263331,0.00012215292,0.00027641287,0.0023362336,0.0037142832,0.0055788537,0.00056686194,0.0010402476,0.0012189315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01457751,0.00020975387,0.00020017794,0.001458175,0.009529603,0.0022377498,0.0028134757,0.0014787215,0.00018362308],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000359857,0.000023192582,0.013623461,0.00022423491,0.000029527188,0.00030977372,0.024327086,0.0007490807,0.0007491103,0.9044545,0.003226225,0.052247692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060733208,0.00023723017,0.12206032,0.0011015821,0.00011045503,0.0007870041,0.016114336,0.0014582616,0.0016095493,0.3497259,0.5066646,0.00006997086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010598583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015079212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010598583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036388224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0085311765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03312403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121799125","doi":"10.3138/utlj.1203","title":"Savigny’s theory of choice-of-law as a principle of ‘voluntary submission’","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Choice of law; Epistemology; Element (criminal law); Key (lock); Law; Sociology; Reflection (computer programming); Law and economics; Conflict of laws; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.02190900661073231,"score_gpt":0.27186577919541177,"score_spread":0.24995677258467947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121799125","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026587037,0.0026125133,0.32012093,0.035079747,0.0006420493,0.00026498572,0.00017273925,0.00012915567,0.6143909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9080907,0.0012863799,0.030487293,0.0053677433,0.0006280266,0.0005044146,0.000067661545,0.00009564228,0.05347227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905917,0.004008668,0.0003524292,0.0015517093,0.0024399955,0.0010554555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99554956,0.0024145222,0.00041097973,0.0006147823,0.0007386419,0.00027155448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008751235,0.0007501246,0.0007722059,0.0018531742,0.004481712,0.00742256,0.002166067,0.0060346317,0.0049542794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010442194,0.00045094165,0.0013808189,0.0014031176,0.035187818,0.0075027086,0.0043344293,0.005789936,0.0010289041],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011898976,0.0000018441065,0.000023204879,0.0000038629864,9.588042e-7,0.0000065939043,0.00017871732,0.00006943657,0.0000088010465,0.9990157,0.0003005245,0.00038928053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005398733,0.000006442799,0.000053671283,0.000014639492,0.0000018948587,0.00002418739,0.00006216834,0.00040034784,0.000044357148,0.9862205,0.013160081,0.000006262484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060898457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048797387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008751235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007881485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060579726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0571844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122009549","doi":"10.1111/1540-5893.3703006","title":"Judicial Decisionmaking and the Use of Panels in the Canadian Supreme Court and the South African Appellate Division","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Assertion; Ideology; Law; Political science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.08489844829569734,"score_gpt":0.30094012456166824,"score_spread":0.2160416762659709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122009549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89093864,0.0010597651,0.00089281093,0.0050392738,0.00004719957,0.00011701565,0.00010421959,0.000013305534,0.10178773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99635255,0.00027665027,0.00032873562,0.00026805734,0.0000104970295,0.00001603203,0.000026800506,0.0000037270522,0.002717086],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9821133,0.0070712315,0.00041029058,0.0013496106,0.004399463,0.0046561006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97479486,0.010924546,0.004277792,0.001074533,0.0050723255,0.0038558566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0142581165,0.00026124337,0.00036127734,0.0024788915,0.019503735,0.006741499,0.0012589073,0.0015901164,0.0039267233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042953532,0.00037545597,0.00025501224,0.003284506,0.008456227,0.0015104625,0.002472497,0.0020956714,0.00031113627],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00075895357,0.00041508063,0.35875866,0.00027841478,0.00028932825,0.0016724064,0.20513244,0.00716909,0.0063120173,0.22666384,0.022379784,0.17017008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022022259,0.00019801999,0.75541794,0.0005136552,0.00022815686,0.00030995646,0.09727357,0.0072142817,0.0032118424,0.035140917,0.09998159,0.00028991088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80662143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96863776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031362258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039479636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3890348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122212394","doi":"10.1353/can.2007.0017","title":"Governing with the Charter: Legislative and Judicial Activism and Framer's Intent (review)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Historical Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Supreme court; Law; Judicial activism; Legislature; Politics; Judicial review; Judicial interpretation; Sociology","score_opus":0.02081082777139342,"score_gpt":0.24941440981143156,"score_spread":0.22860358204003814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122212394","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000083512256,0.9544444,0.00012371254,0.02128923,0.018321436,0.000029685967,0.00008249273,0.000022007365,0.0056036133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002635773,0.92032593,0.00023657017,0.026221968,0.028154328,0.000104542385,0.00024403665,0.000029090235,0.022047728],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997792,0.00066288974,0.00024294775,0.00018479,0.00094739924,0.00016995217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937975,0.0023804482,0.00069584744,0.00013535042,0.0025740182,0.000416749],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030606699,0.00088154315,0.0010787792,0.0038558654,0.00094707566,0.0051421546,0.0013329027,0.0036917464,0.01346051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011273725,0.000718827,0.0006281099,0.004614546,0.002274681,0.0041743275,0.0010641924,0.003456827,0.008476798],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017817949,0.00000965994,0.00006649131,0.0014407367,0.000009618674,0.000037066548,0.000087194545,0.000037683636,0.00005868319,0.0016539091,0.9355601,0.06102104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007699949,0.000012734576,0.000516048,0.004156397,0.000010690138,0.00010574631,0.00015393409,0.000018046705,0.000021975735,0.0007114817,0.99427444,0.000010677198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014539029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028271258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9960712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003928757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065959897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122426454","doi":"10.1093/icon/mol002","title":"Prologue: North American constitutionalism?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Prologue; Constitutionalism; Political science; History; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.014854806903517002,"score_gpt":0.2973220546938847,"score_spread":0.2824672477903677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122426454","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030913611,0.017487668,0.0013639724,0.14574459,0.005040455,0.000013653686,0.00008732949,0.000048903807,0.82712203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50548947,0.0377154,0.0025158029,0.12066581,0.02088879,0.0002828445,0.00037833472,0.00025842196,0.31180516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729,0.0011329775,0.000094871364,0.00044937528,0.00063104875,0.00040172887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99703026,0.0017314685,0.00016971896,0.00033643347,0.00045783017,0.0002743092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035602364,0.00031083298,0.0004083694,0.0015264846,0.008256025,0.009013215,0.0010040499,0.0037499142,0.024238445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0094217975,0.00024112196,0.00031884044,0.0022876489,0.01368465,0.008914282,0.003382367,0.009721023,0.0029468942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004284841,0.000008085082,0.00008890042,0.000023298975,0.0000015681496,0.000047143567,0.00085831207,0.000024467443,0.000011115812,0.93503773,0.056459777,0.0074351877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073130204,0.000004139358,0.00045602734,0.00014054369,0.000003268097,0.00009540119,0.000932014,0.00006971757,0.000029494078,0.21555965,0.78269583,0.0000065541617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02672325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034730818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97327673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0078069707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058944346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08108562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124152619","doi":"10.1017/s0008423904030951","title":"New Questions about an Old Concept: The Supreme Court of Canada's Judicial Independence Decisions","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Humanities; Judicial independence; Political science; Law; Art","score_opus":0.027911736148422038,"score_gpt":0.3058213408867011,"score_spread":0.2779096047382791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124152619","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03081983,0.041631795,0.007231483,0.51639134,0.0033073253,0.000039663533,0.0008197708,0.000064080916,0.3996947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8925444,0.01716298,0.003298171,0.041894063,0.0030902803,0.000039275485,0.00026966925,0.00011328662,0.041587934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919395,0.0017320174,0.00016493983,0.0009848034,0.0032995204,0.0018792509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98672044,0.0048200246,0.00044967927,0.00049673265,0.0056414283,0.001871626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00859609,0.0005370237,0.00076444494,0.0053398004,0.0260593,0.024207126,0.0037628673,0.0075807595,0.01225037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015450934,0.00039387358,0.0005011031,0.0077067283,0.064126134,0.016153183,0.0033297655,0.010131459,0.00067204534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009585492,0.000007455072,0.00048626852,0.000027473332,0.000004680371,0.00004628489,0.0032065364,0.00023149952,0.000029864372,0.96315354,0.025521195,0.0072756456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019212071,0.000010068782,0.0041466984,0.0005348094,0.000018072458,0.00006241533,0.016869493,0.0013888202,0.000107073276,0.62458223,0.3521725,0.00008857821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96501374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97374696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17428683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17428683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1312478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95771027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124336077","doi":"10.1017/s000712340500013x","title":"Interpreting a Bill of Rights: The Importance of Legislative Rights Review","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Legislature; Legislation; Judgement; Law and economics; Bill of rights; Law; Politics; Fundamental rights; Parliament; Human rights; Premise; State (computer science); Welfare rights; Judicial review; Social rights; Reservation of rights; Right to property; Sociology","score_opus":0.0211615574922424,"score_gpt":0.3325517148328495,"score_spread":0.3113901573406071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124336077","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009083976,0.036218002,0.11269701,0.6700038,0.010830934,0.00041191588,0.000073685296,0.00016848116,0.16051236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57854664,0.029767381,0.11711354,0.21223213,0.028937407,0.0017965061,0.00017129527,0.0005269598,0.030908195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7414549,0.18812884,0.01308111,0.00953774,0.039891157,0.007906275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.61992836,0.33799568,0.008698624,0.012045941,0.018735975,0.0025955157],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.19981329,0.00061594014,0.002142245,0.0045497855,0.011225443,0.025126562,0.0043460284,0.024003008,0.0033734129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31390217,0.0012648809,0.0013127782,0.0029592447,0.05071859,0.029334858,0.00868861,0.025427245,0.0013282476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010986977,0.000011394682,0.00012664404,0.000106877924,0.000013291606,0.00010478065,0.003922726,0.00023031054,0.000109854314,0.9738367,0.008197981,0.013328386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030062027,0.000030594583,0.00027926973,0.0007999099,0.000024031646,0.000115270086,0.0015534343,0.0005654821,0.00030779844,0.7967284,0.19951373,0.00005205718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00405636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035545924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19981329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009997502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024201555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98677266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124841371","doi":"10.1017/s0008423910000673","title":"Charter Creep: Creeping Precommitment and the Threat to Liberal Republicanism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Precommitment; Humanities; Political science; Charter; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.019934611659881182,"score_gpt":0.2946486068241662,"score_spread":0.274713995164285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124841371","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20451798,0.0016134166,0.009905053,0.103263,0.00032111077,0.000059930055,0.0000744118,0.00012367143,0.68012136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98336524,0.00023609957,0.0004122496,0.003233659,0.00008557992,0.000015221269,0.000010656115,0.000021798343,0.012619422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99200714,0.0025583648,0.00012636422,0.0008390675,0.00214882,0.002320107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99181527,0.0036026177,0.0010487444,0.0013116259,0.001347807,0.00087393296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064317547,0.00018419878,0.00036575526,0.00082402024,0.009057044,0.008165246,0.0012460627,0.0045152786,0.0065856217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019080479,0.00017416678,0.000323533,0.001234562,0.032194376,0.003957963,0.0042767785,0.0076662228,0.00042306082],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011094939,0.000006443323,0.00059365446,0.0000073851656,0.0000017248532,0.000077741744,0.003100024,0.00025250524,0.00007287951,0.9888437,0.0031655775,0.003867191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046502693,0.000030410138,0.004551227,0.00016783962,0.000013711381,0.0001274719,0.0069807116,0.0017618606,0.00045905224,0.81736916,0.16844495,0.00004723171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19508936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1884919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19508936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019828169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021342041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38790756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124915316","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1143","title":"Working with Bertha Wilson: Perspectives on Liberty, Judicial Decision-Making and a Judge’s Role","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law; Legitimacy; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.03866725957518929,"score_gpt":0.30039193458137065,"score_spread":0.26172467500618135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124915316","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10595343,0.10304524,0.022131039,0.4152301,0.0014387032,0.000053240885,0.000048019563,0.000043814474,0.35205644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9388939,0.013283615,0.0039065154,0.01714772,0.0006881285,0.000038698206,0.000009049136,0.000031653697,0.026000658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.988311,0.008151788,0.00016306428,0.0007382856,0.0014257615,0.0012100189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833603,0.014280153,0.00074628775,0.00020527437,0.00089034386,0.00051775126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010524438,0.00055021263,0.00051009917,0.0028140577,0.017442092,0.016206877,0.0018533046,0.008691979,0.0019394995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01184838,0.00045634832,0.00042485484,0.0027256268,0.056170125,0.008740776,0.0030110704,0.0074857906,0.00022933129],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007831545,0.000011322384,0.00019831466,0.00002468107,0.0000033079575,0.0002094902,0.018608507,0.00024453772,0.00007481837,0.97133213,0.004913372,0.0043716775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021351585,0.000044832614,0.00071311946,0.00044108852,0.000015175452,0.00026085335,0.031349815,0.0007054267,0.0004480342,0.740329,0.2256052,0.00006609901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12328782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17102787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12328782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01856196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01443023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24514043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125272190","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v6n2p116","title":"Reaching Out: Understanding the Puzzle of Cross-Party Nominations to the Lower United States Federal Courts","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nomination; NOMINATE; Opposition (politics); Political science; Politics; Law; State (computer science); Democracy; Divided government; Primary election; Public administration","score_opus":0.058339100055649656,"score_gpt":0.3371470957235586,"score_spread":0.2788079956679089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125272190","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879479,0.00042243843,0.0004839522,0.0031721764,0.000021840779,0.000012550562,0.00008583945,0.0000042294514,0.007849138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99937195,0.000101841804,0.00009634356,0.00012333276,0.000041436142,0.0000055838054,0.00004778795,0.0000018539246,0.00020974188],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99316883,0.004416272,0.0002845219,0.00070437556,0.00058151956,0.0008444417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92828816,0.03907974,0.023202755,0.0025061732,0.002869218,0.0040538935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008340845,0.00025854373,0.00061078503,0.0032860585,0.003329655,0.005156878,0.000928852,0.00142709,0.0054598595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06810661,0.0003079591,0.00033179953,0.0026438714,0.002466339,0.0042777187,0.002690254,0.0023131445,0.00046192456],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001032128,0.00014019961,0.9499238,0.000045753863,0.00007506979,0.00028910188,0.009700334,0.00063442916,0.0001740123,0.009089356,0.0014495081,0.028375268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015039486,0.000106308544,0.9597742,0.000097873,0.000044280085,0.0002843719,0.023256168,0.0037205233,0.00015012122,0.0075530894,0.0049668117,0.000031128704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013509087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023402784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013509087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013084038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011852703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044111133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125365623","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1062","title":"Constitutional Legitimacy and Responsibility: Confronting Allegations of Bias After Wewaykum Indian Band v. Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Constitution; Certiorari; Impartiality; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.03613483300809244,"score_gpt":0.29369336116453676,"score_spread":0.2575585281564443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125365623","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22608282,0.013481216,0.0027219173,0.2564197,0.0010210398,0.00013129853,0.0001304818,0.00005221231,0.4999593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9600553,0.002443361,0.00047341973,0.014666496,0.00017832592,0.000024110557,0.0000200496,0.000024342891,0.02211462],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875257,0.0021064247,0.00022796774,0.00084603776,0.004066021,0.0052279844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99202853,0.0046355966,0.0005214166,0.00028549402,0.0017662408,0.000762768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067545897,0.0002704405,0.0006071951,0.001713094,0.033984635,0.013319802,0.002370033,0.009214427,0.0024376821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020649103,0.00046427213,0.00039486666,0.0022330713,0.028724395,0.0036239454,0.0048885033,0.011225618,0.00017782464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001771388,0.000013428978,0.0020817197,0.000043665354,0.000013156045,0.0016901455,0.037702788,0.00020439121,0.00034303463,0.9342278,0.015335826,0.008326284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060587045,0.00005128811,0.014037275,0.0006105184,0.0001260746,0.00086870824,0.08965297,0.000955466,0.0021476175,0.18524349,0.7060091,0.00023693792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.936042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97112197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.080563396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.080563396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1082306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58453107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125589068","doi":"10.24908/eoe-ese-rse.v5i0.641","title":"Crossing the Line: Homophobic Speech and Public School Teachers","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Encounters in Theory and History of Education","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Sexual orientation; Duty; Freedom of expression; Law; Political science; Homosexuality; Set (abstract data type); Enforcement; Constitutional right; Position (finance); Sociology; Human rights; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Business; Constitution","score_opus":0.02514187869114551,"score_gpt":0.2932884427131373,"score_spread":0.2681465640219918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125589068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9160006,0.0010044398,0.000512708,0.042057484,0.00023487389,0.000020244392,0.000014767025,0.000027353359,0.040127445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99323034,0.0002227013,0.000047234767,0.004114378,0.000058195303,0.000009909664,0.000002270049,0.000008655125,0.0023062723],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99070895,0.0058330786,0.00021368086,0.0005479347,0.0008956135,0.0018008163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99220604,0.00482851,0.0012018918,0.00035514167,0.0003530744,0.0010554278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053229346,0.0003046072,0.0005507961,0.0011634645,0.020215213,0.007978565,0.00076385477,0.0067443023,0.0037648145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013677919,0.0005472077,0.00026274787,0.00061149674,0.03047692,0.0048342207,0.005039524,0.010599713,0.00049404864],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022859478,0.000088238405,0.004293713,0.000021914793,0.0000054015572,0.0020816918,0.9607676,0.000021321972,0.0003589506,0.0246176,0.0034242603,0.0042964406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014877844,0.000042936197,0.0033161396,0.000110200264,0.000008903585,0.0016373374,0.9682073,0.00009385956,0.00033657407,0.0064844284,0.019720849,0.000026654378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015579661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017298758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020215213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041512633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031107024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030977964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127368234","doi":"10.22201/cisan.24487228e.2011.2.138","title":"The Economic Crisis of 2008-2009: Governance and Consumer Democracy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Corporate governance; Politics; Financial crisis; Interpretation (philosophy); Political economy; Representation (politics); Safeguard; Political science; Economics; Business; Law and economics; Economic policy; Law; Finance; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.21719771021457845,"score_gpt":0.5014606382950257,"score_spread":0.2842629280804473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127368234","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4816149,0.0075866976,0.001764066,0.24216391,0.0003941943,0.000049036214,0.0002097105,0.000031065832,0.26618648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861509,0.002061572,0.00022767471,0.0034267826,0.00011318162,0.000017135128,0.000058490157,0.00001085177,0.007933373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989531,0.0004270996,0.000039143513,0.00008363743,0.00020088485,0.0002960333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986761,0.000561417,0.00036507793,0.000046891662,0.00020943458,0.0001410095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017475454,0.00008108331,0.00013219152,0.0003940648,0.0019309932,0.0044818167,0.00023825144,0.0013264392,0.0018970266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037254712,0.0000895538,0.00007130347,0.0009957326,0.0033871054,0.0025639469,0.001527653,0.0025503957,0.0001368876],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008542586,0.000056800924,0.021690127,0.00010913846,0.0000075304815,0.0006753455,0.035785194,0.0005448896,0.00030409856,0.8443773,0.058479343,0.0378849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003106991,0.000075638876,0.10526069,0.00067743595,0.000008885759,0.00057396904,0.09177249,0.0013661749,0.00088603905,0.16115566,0.63814414,0.000047842885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0151482895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035279047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0151482895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005146589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028359054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037341297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127507417","doi":"10.1093/icon/mor067","title":"The Canadian Charter of Rights and the minister of justice: Weak-form review within a constitutional Charter of Rights","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Political science; Legislature; Judicial review; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Parliament","score_opus":0.047762443208032204,"score_gpt":0.3517338849698267,"score_spread":0.3039714417617945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127507417","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024960635,0.7372657,0.004491991,0.10573293,0.0029029138,0.00013375413,0.00010683495,0.000049707985,0.14682001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24436592,0.6480565,0.010775727,0.070570424,0.0022138166,0.0002321164,0.00017579061,0.000059528742,0.023550116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.984533,0.005338861,0.00062245195,0.001040354,0.0077426806,0.0007225676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98142666,0.008178542,0.00087951723,0.0007800329,0.008052348,0.00068289397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012838093,0.0003475818,0.00075733475,0.0030518945,0.004977091,0.006523754,0.0015293085,0.0030955856,0.0021128564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031202018,0.00039411904,0.00034234222,0.0057741604,0.013796714,0.0040233666,0.0017815493,0.005695469,0.00038854234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019783196,0.000011477359,0.00043346614,0.0019911062,0.000024742087,0.00010031588,0.0017621266,0.0002834516,0.00016951482,0.734333,0.08095471,0.17991643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001667554,0.000017469383,0.0018811662,0.0041550766,0.000036939964,0.00010164717,0.00059493387,0.0001292,0.00016391362,0.03951647,0.953352,0.000034496716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7192199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.788395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28078008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036546938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1204066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56486726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129502429","doi":"10.1177/0032329205275193","title":"Social Movements and Judicial Empowerment: Courts, Public Policy, and Lesbian and Gay Organizing in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Society","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Lesbian; Charter; Empowerment; Politics; Political science; Gay rights; Social movement; Human rights; Public policy; Public administration; Gender studies; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.028643222515590202,"score_gpt":0.2951094067377347,"score_spread":0.2664661842221445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129502429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.779703,0.004482007,0.00045431353,0.049614698,0.000120131204,0.000093051516,0.00015629022,0.000018809878,0.1653577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899436,0.0013655358,0.00014236978,0.0014705905,0.000017164404,0.000016557884,0.000029414769,0.0000057613706,0.0070090136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934215,0.0010035415,0.000082958904,0.00026746513,0.0015181135,0.003706442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99486536,0.0016312472,0.00058618176,0.00009141445,0.001182211,0.0016435538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032021147,0.00027545763,0.00041643198,0.0031515274,0.039991084,0.009871161,0.0016107744,0.0023219935,0.0058113197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008842924,0.00030685417,0.00035511024,0.004241172,0.02144363,0.0018407088,0.0058159004,0.0037556493,0.00013461332],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110322835,0.00026559914,0.07194055,0.00017303003,0.000047806592,0.0016291362,0.17940612,0.0019526231,0.00079379283,0.67526925,0.020290306,0.048121516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010346862,0.00007280996,0.20223752,0.0005638438,0.00009314045,0.0002571764,0.5022396,0.0018091954,0.001069481,0.030669264,0.26071,0.0001745919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99467385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17306598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17306598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30936947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95912623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131317104","doi":"10.3138/utlj.020614-02ra","title":"The work of Lon Fuller: A promising direction for jurisprudence in the twenty-first century","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Principle of legality; Legitimacy; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Perspective (graphical); Law and economics; Sociology; History; Politics; Art","score_opus":0.011890624605049945,"score_gpt":0.2366738668175516,"score_spread":0.22478324221250165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131317104","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059230495,0.28229484,0.0069590267,0.5161594,0.0054689706,0.000021301992,0.000056432305,0.00003777343,0.18307915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5888603,0.20435643,0.011104519,0.11405037,0.013040243,0.00016805987,0.000097061726,0.00017539457,0.06814756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99513644,0.003234559,0.0001045154,0.00037125376,0.00083312363,0.0003201085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913884,0.0067945565,0.00029664073,0.00045595202,0.0005548097,0.000509615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006630112,0.0005132449,0.0007443967,0.0026695202,0.006434864,0.009135054,0.0013272188,0.0061521027,0.0049083047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008140032,0.00023827371,0.00036879562,0.0024915056,0.049982045,0.015113429,0.0037854668,0.0067743664,0.00053077453],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004320196,0.0000042252655,0.000029250468,0.000035591347,0.000001316249,0.000015772477,0.0014933475,0.000035443732,0.0000090961,0.9819313,0.011749296,0.0046909894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075436437,0.000010542778,0.00012390938,0.0003241348,0.000001930019,0.00005139951,0.0023159126,0.00007651554,0.000041008545,0.6395981,0.35743758,0.000011484202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011824665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015866313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011824665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0084865065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075641326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06157422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132631441","doi":"10.1017/s0008197300000052","title":"Standing under the Human Rights Act 1998: Theories of Rights Enforcement &amp; the Nature of Public Law Adjudication","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Adjudication; Jurisdiction; Political science; Human rights; Enforcement; Context (archaeology); Convention; Test (biology); Law and economics; Order (exchange); Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.028750558317221266,"score_gpt":0.30496848903460483,"score_spread":0.27621793071738354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132631441","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043466467,0.02152747,0.05561977,0.1194177,0.00057825266,0.00019114744,0.00020606558,0.00004847139,0.75894475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9437446,0.008402647,0.0078414185,0.0058303596,0.000933842,0.0004159118,0.00012988794,0.000033256973,0.03266795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934308,0.0036513733,0.00023501688,0.00053608813,0.0015370576,0.00060962926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990121,0.0072592176,0.00094127376,0.00058459514,0.0008713433,0.00022259243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0088559855,0.00059016934,0.00049148616,0.0028074074,0.004016314,0.009839449,0.0022505363,0.009382639,0.0062970114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012408863,0.00050144474,0.0006731302,0.0033344578,0.032476358,0.00975051,0.0026092837,0.0062243026,0.00089277717],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013850234,0.000005347531,0.00009416817,0.0000072897437,9.93178e-7,0.000017480252,0.0005310535,0.00009247572,0.0000060337698,0.9971739,0.00085157173,0.0012183426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010659636,0.000017245347,0.0007676186,0.00018673476,0.0000068804884,0.000078600846,0.00079593406,0.00096908736,0.00008498023,0.966242,0.030829733,0.00001056527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00965461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007506378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009839449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008707934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00616209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063180804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132852309","doi":"10.1017/s2045381712000032","title":"Constitutionalism in an old key: Legality and constituent power","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Constitutionalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Principle of legality; Legal positivism; Positivism; Law; Ambivalence; Political science; Power (physics); Constitutional theory; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Epistemology; Legal research; Sociology; Legal realism; Constitutional law; Democracy; Philosophy; Politics; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.037486787777682336,"score_gpt":0.3369695124857261,"score_spread":0.29948272470804377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132852309","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11323935,0.0073368815,0.050549645,0.042601526,0.0004929988,0.000034891153,0.0000728285,0.000055263998,0.7856166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990647,0.00061547157,0.0011327291,0.0007218889,0.00017705637,0.000013961775,0.000012915572,0.000020029132,0.0066589583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99696654,0.0016840269,0.00009974951,0.0005457762,0.0004476312,0.00025634718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938736,0.004038628,0.00041203335,0.0008268992,0.0005896774,0.0002591061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048966403,0.00019366137,0.00039126945,0.00171335,0.003420218,0.005997577,0.0007642071,0.001494532,0.0070774034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0079848105,0.00017120467,0.00026604228,0.0014828785,0.039837584,0.011096418,0.0037673765,0.004016385,0.00040295994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014145252,0.0000011973111,0.000032667613,0.0000039442502,6.208204e-7,0.000006948713,0.0003282753,0.000029039247,0.000021544665,0.9988839,0.00014987258,0.000540659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044046865,0.0000055931014,0.00017135507,0.000028516588,0.000002820731,0.000018693576,0.00040080657,0.0001427285,0.00010357976,0.97952956,0.019588817,0.0000030997871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019146074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021291857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070774034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003866771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001775607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028055549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133710840","doi":"","title":"Adieu to constitutional elitism","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Constitution; European union; Political science; Democracy; Democratic deficit; Elitism; Constitutional review; Politics; Treaty; Law; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.048931891401957764,"score_gpt":0.35777506001605985,"score_spread":0.3088431686141021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133710840","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017099973,0.0047521954,0.006268309,0.054852676,0.0008842413,0.000030011077,0.00007962317,0.00005452806,0.9159784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85986245,0.0036156096,0.0020500016,0.01519073,0.0011386834,0.00006789789,0.00006994352,0.0001348306,0.11786984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98667634,0.005798537,0.00035374876,0.0017393114,0.0039936635,0.0014382522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905324,0.0052853934,0.0005196037,0.0016147188,0.0017459856,0.0003019917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008857028,0.00040436006,0.00045136915,0.0015969983,0.008001102,0.011504391,0.0010937382,0.002953023,0.009688646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018822849,0.00019648422,0.00037834886,0.0016741866,0.04075411,0.005609635,0.004642796,0.007762486,0.0009556896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022192298,0.0000030960261,0.00008694368,0.000007809216,8.797248e-7,0.000017090439,0.0010497281,0.0000370286,0.000017731765,0.99437237,0.0025251529,0.0018800057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001541331,0.000009793596,0.0005157419,0.00012335982,0.000006554437,0.00009576573,0.0029078096,0.00026632534,0.00042597816,0.57712156,0.41850165,0.000010101077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033401906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033223033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033401906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016905924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010855199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12266165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134839478","doi":"10.3138/cjls.26.1.001","title":"L'influence du contexte économique et idéologique sur la conception de l'être humain par le droit et le juge constitutionnels: les cas canadien, indien et sud-africain","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027545209502814246,"score_gpt":0.24783270906308455,"score_spread":0.2202874995602703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134839478","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60360265,0.0066451016,0.002582114,0.024524428,0.00018537152,0.000053541433,0.00016464108,0.000015236595,0.36222693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925607,0.00086364284,0.00028581283,0.00050490646,0.000011388442,0.00002244675,0.00001858971,0.000004922505,0.0057275635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982773,0.0009253269,0.00003175519,0.0001276643,0.00023355233,0.00040431807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99816495,0.0010112694,0.0001916883,0.00007725852,0.0003367624,0.00021813528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002216031,0.00026895295,0.00027678235,0.0015844845,0.008012036,0.008650429,0.00057920004,0.0009825455,0.003870505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025809042,0.00012988212,0.0002017711,0.0020289277,0.020291926,0.0022435938,0.0028721783,0.0018976767,0.00013998509],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002728237,0.000016838761,0.011395638,0.00007615306,0.000014142669,0.00046380298,0.2683344,0.00020353124,0.000309249,0.71203977,0.0016235602,0.00549564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021787715,0.000025243742,0.042306785,0.00088642025,0.00004405691,0.00021877444,0.6905118,0.00035718732,0.00042538572,0.06869093,0.19645663,0.00005502877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41518772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54309005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5848123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020891242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015061371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8255421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135872986","doi":"10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053006.183906","title":"The Judicialization of Mega-Politics and the Rise of Political Courts","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Scope (computer science); Law and economics; Jurisprudence; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.025470387812628587,"score_gpt":0.35042843041777383,"score_spread":0.32495804260514527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135872986","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52454126,0.013354896,0.01855299,0.039473835,0.00023584584,0.000057201498,0.000049483948,0.00005748236,0.4036769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99532986,0.0009033444,0.00050150754,0.00088505395,0.000119889424,0.000010471366,0.000008326206,0.000009184262,0.0022324612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897063,0.0060088104,0.00023680579,0.0011115373,0.001796136,0.0011404302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9811849,0.012210261,0.0026205655,0.0015568283,0.0015581057,0.0008693752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072307885,0.000121539924,0.00038129155,0.0013095184,0.005273574,0.0070186714,0.0006415686,0.002147318,0.0026453566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01696292,0.00026973314,0.00021179122,0.0018543183,0.017543295,0.005160289,0.003336265,0.004484466,0.00022545524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014554053,0.000010975839,0.00226789,0.00003258444,0.0000054449497,0.000107263964,0.009644431,0.00017296731,0.0003812084,0.9727864,0.0014624902,0.013113748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005129677,0.000095313626,0.03679195,0.0003849471,0.000024355822,0.00059092557,0.029447388,0.0022224141,0.0012347758,0.7006639,0.22842486,0.000067804074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026389519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005016414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072307885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004050483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026302538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038240492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135894233","doi":"","title":"The Protection of the Rights of Homosexuals Under the International Law of Human Rights: European Perspectives","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; International human rights law; Political science; Law; Fundamental rights; Linguistic rights; Charter; Right to property; Ex post facto law; Convention; Reservation of rights; Sexual orientation; Sociology","score_opus":0.02172082428904606,"score_gpt":0.2747506803166186,"score_spread":0.25302985602757255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135894233","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019293644,0.07938128,0.0019846072,0.04488002,0.00078650465,0.000014528409,0.00004478352,0.000011073436,0.85360366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88650334,0.05379473,0.0025138773,0.018892584,0.002111447,0.000062013976,0.00006688487,0.00004190589,0.036013134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99439067,0.0030688387,0.00015328302,0.00042050847,0.0009361415,0.00103058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998162,0.0010655185,0.00017884598,0.00019723292,0.0001979482,0.0001984423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009406015,0.00047245095,0.0005299081,0.00238211,0.0041788653,0.012667621,0.0009232479,0.0067721307,0.004796389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004409542,0.00019450262,0.00042837585,0.0028067278,0.030384207,0.007416527,0.0040542823,0.005530143,0.00041158573],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004714251,0.0000070461997,0.00006320104,0.000023897783,0.000002138853,0.000025303874,0.0017475098,0.00003345952,0.000048685913,0.99322504,0.0010464861,0.0037724515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023084554,0.000046314395,0.002284675,0.0015060711,0.000019723942,0.0002681432,0.011089827,0.00022659366,0.00049276295,0.6508397,0.33317116,0.00003188942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006496552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007254823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012667621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041939295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035306686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049744368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136017761","doi":"","title":"Reconciling Parliamentary Sovereignty and Judicial Review: On The Theoretical and Historical Origins of the Israeli Legislative Override Power","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings constitutional law quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Sovereignty; Legislature; Judicial review; Parliamentary sovereignty; Legislation; Political science; Law; Constitutionalism; Popular sovereignty; Constitutional theory; Supreme court; Politics; Charter; Judicial interpretation; Separation of powers; Constitutional law; Democracy","score_opus":0.04084824629556707,"score_gpt":0.25498193038083716,"score_spread":0.2141336840852701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136017761","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.116071805,0.016107392,0.009453831,0.059728272,0.00033157185,0.000038418737,0.00004835763,0.00004895034,0.7981713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97762454,0.0028883175,0.00093096483,0.0038608683,0.00025017542,0.000017016,0.000012048143,0.000018702289,0.014397226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953868,0.0020350611,0.00011230157,0.00050039135,0.00097533513,0.0009901273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99317825,0.00519582,0.00040633322,0.000282026,0.00073083607,0.00020675814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070329527,0.0001322953,0.00024520344,0.0017020962,0.006534419,0.010461028,0.001040043,0.003683978,0.0022625807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007314689,0.00024828146,0.00019898893,0.0014643784,0.027714482,0.00474282,0.0019496982,0.00392029,0.00019847655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063143616,0.0000050342383,0.00029940504,0.0000097502325,0.0000016050714,0.0000658578,0.0058002225,0.00007543329,0.000064091364,0.98800105,0.0010779039,0.00459334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004762817,0.00007406105,0.0071173236,0.0006640991,0.00003505373,0.0004942558,0.01880947,0.002248472,0.0019834582,0.5148307,0.4536023,0.00009323196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.067624055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10661683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.067624055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01919793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011723084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13929135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136775099","doi":"10.1017/s0008423905040485","title":"The Political Foundations of Support for Same-Sex Marriage in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Realm; Legislature; Framing (construction); Supreme court; Sociology; Humanities; Law; Ethnology; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.03089683373900302,"score_gpt":0.3176381630610328,"score_spread":0.2867413293220298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136775099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81472105,0.0022177733,0.00045198412,0.027953988,0.00008552887,0.000050935967,0.0012552672,0.000018972396,0.15324454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965305,0.00036282002,0.000064550964,0.0003250465,0.000008954175,0.0000038876747,0.00008160652,0.0000027884564,0.0026199121],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99717367,0.00022601422,0.00005101561,0.00017445548,0.0011271677,0.0012477054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923239,0.0016017278,0.0012259377,0.00017051221,0.0028488198,0.0018292001],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017130818,0.00011301863,0.00031901195,0.0022576335,0.008765973,0.004159405,0.001029012,0.0008633721,0.008131409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0085022375,0.00019446628,0.00021664484,0.0038221206,0.003973398,0.000622533,0.0015682492,0.0016138209,0.00017534486],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027357,0.00013286536,0.5665053,0.00022935652,0.00012588283,0.00071634044,0.033021323,0.0015094485,0.0009197835,0.28666294,0.032780003,0.0771232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005359771,0.000035863584,0.84566355,0.00024391724,0.00009845294,0.00009760761,0.04246571,0.0022715032,0.000531921,0.010173096,0.09828491,0.000079794125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9949438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0772519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0772519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09731087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56050444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136862874","doi":"10.1017/s0008423908080451","title":"Terms of Entitlement: Is there a Distinctly Canadian “Rights Talk”?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Charter; Politics; Humanities; Political science; Fundamental rights; Supreme court; Sociology; Ethnology; Law; Human rights; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02784867928101374,"score_gpt":0.2804549233684228,"score_spread":0.25260624408740906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136862874","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25139302,0.002220475,0.003367285,0.03547026,0.0003420144,0.000051757634,0.00037177396,0.000046858317,0.70673645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97813547,0.00077402516,0.00051183853,0.0015522407,0.00005830589,0.000019265935,0.000072570394,0.000037448564,0.01883882],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955688,0.00106457,0.00007340057,0.00044354508,0.0019367555,0.00091296196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99646676,0.0014822938,0.0003532353,0.00021170612,0.001005912,0.00048002924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030855602,0.00036818438,0.00031483904,0.0031212869,0.021970345,0.012994724,0.0014646385,0.0018567629,0.010515503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077778785,0.00028838968,0.00026400795,0.004811871,0.033316713,0.0061365766,0.0049532666,0.0037212067,0.0004994265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003318806,0.000019878484,0.0036203638,0.00010390618,0.0000067763676,0.00034572068,0.5531041,0.00006737662,0.0010665676,0.41223603,0.008476073,0.020919984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000805313,0.000016670805,0.017580803,0.0004055606,0.000024204164,0.00023075225,0.5509729,0.00029176936,0.00058365206,0.029123621,0.4006761,0.000086020234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90837836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92540497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09162164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052885316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03916916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38371164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137292845","doi":"","title":"Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":477,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Constitutionalism; Treaty; Political science; Adjudication; Commonwealth; Scrutiny; Human rights; Law; Underpinning; European union; Politics; Law and economics; Democracy; Sociology; Economics; International trade","score_opus":0.039657105448221444,"score_gpt":0.30975065739938334,"score_spread":0.2700935519511619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137292845","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059407964,0.00543063,0.046353973,0.020074492,0.00028697253,0.000062794985,0.00006297004,0.00013776738,0.8681824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9772126,0.0011849044,0.0056408914,0.0033239417,0.00030106519,0.000090509,0.00003901611,0.000071890936,0.012135161],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895425,0.005434073,0.0003141983,0.0021854076,0.0015159725,0.0010078129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99541426,0.0023367081,0.0004342295,0.0010778991,0.00052382075,0.0002131107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009975975,0.00036922234,0.00067428435,0.0017683096,0.005293201,0.0083318455,0.0009071672,0.0024895156,0.006278253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010433106,0.00025997814,0.0005608118,0.0020090912,0.03079399,0.007445046,0.007227596,0.0054004933,0.0004187751],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033875015,0.000002881762,0.00014156415,0.000012011042,0.0000040264963,0.000016869173,0.00085413933,0.00023129303,0.00006723857,0.99359775,0.0004769234,0.0045920443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011975971,0.00001007922,0.0005776041,0.00005661249,0.000009790847,0.000035431585,0.000591437,0.00028587494,0.00019854527,0.96791685,0.030298138,0.00000764952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018956214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002078103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009975975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043439264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024811896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052758574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138503724","doi":"10.35534/ltwc.0304019","title":"What is a political constitution?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Traditions of the West and China","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.028679439295641183,"score_gpt":0.2962887946986943,"score_spread":0.2676093554030531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138503724","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06977589,0.0039699855,0.005224914,0.1298016,0.0007272586,0.00005728127,0.00014135601,0.000055049048,0.79024655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9771681,0.0010293893,0.0010836478,0.0025638377,0.000273844,0.000039575243,0.000035188412,0.000022674063,0.017783666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99618846,0.0018343233,0.00010607949,0.00057680276,0.000592594,0.0007017524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99766916,0.0010235369,0.00025614694,0.00027551988,0.00043357225,0.00034200205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055575776,0.0002450417,0.00035996578,0.0014481395,0.0059768613,0.010727058,0.0007530984,0.0025084657,0.006559804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076188343,0.0002265983,0.00029388737,0.0015106328,0.033231236,0.008039198,0.0018271715,0.002816174,0.0005796029],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027390342,0.0000037433233,0.00024019518,0.0000110335295,0.0000018304619,0.000015554564,0.0015422064,0.00005870175,0.000021304999,0.99499255,0.0014315371,0.0016786463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027669756,0.000015124168,0.0023734146,0.0001624498,0.000012023773,0.00003145706,0.0068452386,0.00047410562,0.00022739617,0.88969845,0.10011792,0.000014667029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017046604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015909683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017046604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009714502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010909024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07048398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139164249","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1287","title":"Constructive Unamendability in Canada and the United States","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Federalism; Politics; Political science; Constructive; Constitutional amendment; Pluralism (philosophy); Law; Democracy; Supreme court; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.019163934244301347,"score_gpt":0.2725322793528965,"score_spread":0.2533683451085951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139164249","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07964818,0.020003075,0.002494263,0.024954569,0.00037276628,0.00009429117,0.00034020608,0.00007833326,0.87201434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94929904,0.009891077,0.0020072465,0.0061622607,0.00008635505,0.00007021861,0.00013891344,0.00002825505,0.032316614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99227494,0.0013733758,0.00019575801,0.00063758664,0.0031282832,0.0023900631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924251,0.0025355003,0.00057026563,0.0004210989,0.0033322978,0.00071570807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038288822,0.00030917523,0.00043237236,0.0037070573,0.018074494,0.009544346,0.0012831148,0.002507472,0.0039206464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013323406,0.00039949923,0.00048645752,0.0050239787,0.019549469,0.0021982412,0.00263701,0.0038521385,0.00020227578],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008179278,0.000005431867,0.0012001945,0.000032758853,0.00000971293,0.000116077324,0.001769002,0.00049159635,0.000074705815,0.98321724,0.0049513434,0.0081239315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006605229,0.000041737436,0.042403445,0.0011090324,0.00015808202,0.0002862321,0.010151367,0.002064215,0.0013186291,0.2739126,0.6682186,0.00026999458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9801343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9918257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90155697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09844304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19303447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7142576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139320702","doi":"","title":"Judging the Rules of Belonging","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Norm (philosophy); Position (finance); Power (physics); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.023654768402321242,"score_gpt":0.2639713372556077,"score_spread":0.24031656885328642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139320702","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.089858696,0.0021316651,0.065129146,0.025013609,0.0011352769,0.00025581993,0.00013984501,0.00011885754,0.81621706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768876,0.00062141096,0.009936102,0.0018356291,0.00031040917,0.00014668313,0.0000789043,0.000088802524,0.010094368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9645613,0.015761795,0.0027039957,0.005591349,0.008150283,0.003231405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9586954,0.023644459,0.0027717375,0.0061874,0.0063994867,0.0023013754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03577886,0.00041996266,0.0011083316,0.0028146773,0.011446605,0.016449673,0.0026715978,0.005527508,0.0043947203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08598252,0.00048330144,0.00066950166,0.0012835236,0.0558156,0.01280447,0.008115173,0.006768902,0.0009955809],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000798715,0.000004745426,0.0004948987,0.000015669622,0.0000050261356,0.00004438746,0.0038329726,0.00011991487,0.000092500035,0.99014974,0.0015208449,0.0037112804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018505609,0.000021974149,0.0012792241,0.00012336395,0.000014054324,0.00009004677,0.0039373655,0.00050077244,0.0003760046,0.9540296,0.03958092,0.000028142378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008733673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00949713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03577886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035651675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055921944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.189219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140086801","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2011.00859.x","title":"The Death of Socio‐Economic Rights","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Human rights; Fundamental rights; De facto; Globalization; Law and economics; Hegemony; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.09085241872378821,"score_gpt":0.31817011782237875,"score_spread":0.22731769909859054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140086801","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028845461,0.034504376,0.013667205,0.29526156,0.0024010036,0.000042807045,0.00019348759,0.000057308003,0.6250269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8524958,0.01560406,0.003119925,0.038682844,0.0033184392,0.000097752156,0.00012239393,0.00008005736,0.08647869],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99298084,0.0032648908,0.00020567817,0.0008244909,0.002047877,0.0006762057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918761,0.0041385572,0.00048987713,0.0012750372,0.0017260516,0.0004942905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009597225,0.00035327187,0.00058955257,0.0010439841,0.0038030453,0.0056747547,0.0010164571,0.0034648902,0.004650404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015558043,0.0002562472,0.0003268157,0.0008351376,0.03486893,0.0074827126,0.004287886,0.008724629,0.000883271],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027265871,0.0000027126928,0.000050901937,0.000012317822,0.0000014339822,0.0000119974975,0.0004236853,0.000033560584,0.000023122695,0.9925559,0.0031195686,0.0037620354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001286322,0.000019244679,0.00041566722,0.00017770934,0.000003556318,0.000054308905,0.00066468393,0.00012841875,0.00016208497,0.6833134,0.31503838,0.000009567406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008439584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006615534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009597225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053453315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073613464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05075562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140687383","doi":"10.1177/0920203x09105126","title":"Judicial Interpretation of China's Supreme People's Court as “Secondary Law” with Special Reference to Criminal Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"China Information","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Judicial independence; Political science; Precedent; Majority opinion; Law of the case; Certiorari; Court of record; Sociology; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.011410276127160796,"score_gpt":0.26495080960316064,"score_spread":0.25354053347599986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140687383","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4661463,0.003848738,0.014262163,0.022733152,0.00067448866,0.0001605981,0.00026951247,0.00009536698,0.49180976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875431,0.00034039197,0.0009891171,0.0009096058,0.00008763073,0.00002265769,0.000047238085,0.0000077910845,0.010052507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99718577,0.0009774793,0.00014967073,0.00044268285,0.0006883153,0.0005561048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985191,0.00053459074,0.00018940971,0.00017267378,0.00043612515,0.00014810842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030072283,0.00031497804,0.00035449886,0.0029984473,0.005256452,0.0056484314,0.0009452785,0.0014571644,0.0026467233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037363109,0.00017777887,0.00042244102,0.0027825506,0.010543442,0.0025411206,0.0015076337,0.0017465831,0.00013191915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006084168,0.000004334992,0.002430499,0.000026339498,0.0000063898374,0.00024892957,0.00607794,0.00016581114,0.00030852828,0.9823679,0.0026824328,0.005674761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054921158,0.00013066988,0.0737384,0.0005046777,0.000145598,0.0006575838,0.012721928,0.011255712,0.0037620883,0.658944,0.23792341,0.00016098042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06721036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1255397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06721036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013018768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012108402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13363832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140912625","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x10000279","title":"Judging Alone: Reflections on the Importance of Women on the Court","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Economic Justice; Position (finance); Law; Political science; Solitude; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.09326621534670063,"score_gpt":0.3628824125046064,"score_spread":0.26961619715790575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140912625","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053302374,0.019512758,0.0010727452,0.7260051,0.0049878797,0.00002068648,0.000044977412,0.000017627153,0.19503585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7814903,0.006942943,0.0003010051,0.16210967,0.00259822,0.00004607337,0.00001766123,0.000085038286,0.046408925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9829244,0.011010723,0.0002532548,0.0012279472,0.0017395901,0.002844119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850331,0.011781063,0.00054518704,0.00027001396,0.0009707057,0.0013998052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015108588,0.0005957848,0.00067376497,0.001311784,0.038402054,0.020271115,0.0019657912,0.011559578,0.009230744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019676818,0.0005228579,0.0004178749,0.0014998657,0.07130853,0.016376013,0.008040071,0.019418404,0.0008792648],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033775483,0.000027788996,0.0011784284,0.000071253286,0.000008073204,0.0009789768,0.41436383,0.00003459617,0.00027503766,0.47215,0.09917501,0.011703196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001468425,0.000025961286,0.00079914974,0.00040468707,0.0000063724524,0.00031760707,0.49412447,0.000038135084,0.00024382258,0.038499817,0.46549603,0.000029301205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06825655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11170053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06825655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013751229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009689885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13571852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141053676","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00557.x","title":"Who Controls the Content of Supreme Court Opinions?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Supreme court; Concurrence; Majority opinion; Political science; Concurring opinion; Economic Justice; Judicial opinion; Power (physics); Law; Dissenting opinion; Empirical research; Supreme Court Decisions; Court of record; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.08020318407841402,"score_gpt":0.3343116820694302,"score_spread":0.25410849799101615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141053676","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76805574,0.0019317433,0.03264028,0.0133385975,0.00026385087,0.000102608545,0.00032320162,0.00025541155,0.18308853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953388,0.000185861,0.0009418564,0.00038700612,0.0001775407,0.000015746682,0.00003322451,0.000042379983,0.0028776121],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941063,0.0027389147,0.00025123113,0.0010991171,0.0010107846,0.00079372217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.949456,0.03540108,0.0062608565,0.0021574383,0.0037042908,0.0030203024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058570923,0.00022615021,0.0007131202,0.001204556,0.0012753214,0.0070229066,0.00088060746,0.0018975792,0.009566924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043964904,0.00039521785,0.00025397883,0.00096466026,0.0028468487,0.005495705,0.0009931007,0.0012467656,0.0019345299],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00074133655,0.00072548346,0.2575856,0.00046858823,0.0005264783,0.0015350101,0.011193805,0.0073771183,0.023083786,0.45043507,0.019621797,0.22670597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002503104,0.00039553808,0.21454646,0.00030782336,0.00038048392,0.0009220783,0.009311134,0.039510522,0.010986735,0.66933453,0.053879607,0.00017478316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003223932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038964604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009566924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016704188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016441264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032004595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141122689","doi":"10.1017/s0008423908080712","title":"Governing with the Charter: Legislative and Judicial Activism and Framers' Intent, James B. Kelly, Vancouver and Toronto: UBC Press, 2005, pp. xii, 336.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legislature; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.018447258563238214,"score_gpt":0.25831706606014143,"score_spread":0.23986980749690323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141122689","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021486267,0.3953367,0.004723797,0.18052171,0.0012204834,0.000047352172,0.00074794167,0.00008629794,0.3958295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69866675,0.18098797,0.0024633615,0.005696144,0.0011546061,0.00008990919,0.00048335423,0.00018069001,0.11027728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99753845,0.0011783172,0.00008803832,0.00016359554,0.0006993033,0.00033235835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955113,0.002851291,0.0004536522,0.00013020344,0.0007760405,0.0002775764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043096454,0.0006128139,0.00038690458,0.0019313875,0.005744598,0.0112382965,0.0012821307,0.0029433512,0.007231911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011515376,0.0006083031,0.00020332362,0.005028044,0.014890157,0.0070873527,0.0015019086,0.0030419827,0.0013135374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044617784,0.000038758906,0.003242263,0.0003196223,0.0000160494,0.00019513351,0.06659544,0.00031621006,0.00018243515,0.5852282,0.28428772,0.059533566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024841069,0.000017801804,0.039176878,0.0021084605,0.000044581033,0.00020019391,0.076554164,0.000457293,0.00041896285,0.21070702,0.67024225,0.000047579935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40083155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6597324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5991684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016492939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015366164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7969969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141149083","doi":"10.1017/s000842390277813x","title":"Ghosts of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council: Group Politics and Charter Litigation in Canadian Political Science","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Charter; Supreme court; Legitimacy; Law; Judicial review; Interest group","score_opus":0.03817996828434821,"score_gpt":0.2649548808491777,"score_spread":0.22677491256482946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141149083","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.271651,0.01120268,0.0060731685,0.3103292,0.00079106714,0.00009841189,0.0001095843,0.00006351756,0.3996814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98932856,0.00090564153,0.00043405424,0.0037440443,0.00011425694,0.00001356001,0.000009713664,0.000014005884,0.005436047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.979543,0.005934333,0.00034888508,0.0014012841,0.007933177,0.00483941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.974484,0.016216805,0.0025106876,0.00094035384,0.003959128,0.0018889178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018863795,0.0003055895,0.00066948123,0.0040941276,0.041614432,0.019246232,0.0023567157,0.007831094,0.004115302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04294409,0.0004648613,0.00042089046,0.0058024637,0.060185216,0.0049978127,0.006446062,0.0072506242,0.00017742121],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015616071,0.000009745066,0.0017126212,0.00003016781,0.0000069281027,0.0001121486,0.027258176,0.00033603216,0.00007123495,0.9560433,0.0067619532,0.007641911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012193726,0.00005205594,0.02623656,0.0005728543,0.00014523945,0.00017641613,0.1274551,0.0033244803,0.0008796412,0.5396103,0.3011822,0.00024321314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93774444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95287853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88070714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11929285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13671441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86553425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142018700","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1015","title":"The Charter's Influence Around the World","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Charter; Political science; Constitution; Doctrine; Conservatism; Proportionality (law); Judicial review; Politics","score_opus":0.019451224226226967,"score_gpt":0.2746025546167328,"score_spread":0.2551513303905058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142018700","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.084241465,0.0057223896,0.001366272,0.029306786,0.0011476623,0.000023305922,0.00021389054,0.000065836284,0.87791234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9469903,0.0038807695,0.0006191899,0.005097559,0.00042581672,0.000013486753,0.00011211594,0.000074758,0.042785957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99618214,0.0010626994,0.0000751607,0.0008709631,0.0011975212,0.0006115171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955187,0.0016209022,0.0005973248,0.00041964024,0.00127939,0.0005639631],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032448638,0.00020331178,0.00024815224,0.0017472276,0.007977958,0.0068151476,0.0005724383,0.00095286104,0.0063252705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008132406,0.00016338959,0.00017687732,0.0023702946,0.008099865,0.0025965269,0.002149207,0.0033367262,0.0004616384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003619294,0.000032328986,0.0035787248,0.000035534766,0.000012148358,0.00020751524,0.017289946,0.00022023603,0.00030519572,0.8917107,0.036992818,0.04957874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011254135,0.000043592725,0.012623601,0.00015649495,0.00001946225,0.00012926708,0.006591508,0.00017181969,0.00034806132,0.01922568,0.9606334,0.000045749835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25224474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2813221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25224474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009487116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010677843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50155306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142108321","doi":"10.1017/s0008423904040041","title":"Expanding the ‘Dialogue’ Debate: Federal Government Responses to Lower Court Charter Decisions","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Appeal; Charter; Supreme court; Political science; Government (linguistics); Legislature; Law; Meaning (existential); Original meaning; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.03999940244685713,"score_gpt":0.3192115705877166,"score_spread":0.2792121681408595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142108321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42474008,0.002933298,0.004033037,0.089218214,0.00038353915,0.000121353034,0.00012585885,0.0000688713,0.47837564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925229,0.00033690254,0.00037933988,0.0035606914,0.00005952374,0.000022751192,0.000018340852,0.000010469975,0.0030891201],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9711,0.016514884,0.0003514306,0.0011890224,0.00505718,0.0057874923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9738461,0.019607194,0.0012673968,0.000717807,0.0034113007,0.0011501726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017867237,0.00037282798,0.00054877467,0.0034900084,0.03453306,0.019304287,0.0024502256,0.011238285,0.004223646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034598988,0.00035048887,0.00048607695,0.0049337693,0.029934771,0.008258742,0.007158798,0.007533884,0.0003121405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001512411,0.000068581234,0.0026454015,0.000119502096,0.000015947855,0.0009103933,0.50018024,0.0007189517,0.0009578721,0.45996746,0.012730002,0.021534337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009384481,0.00006976215,0.018516485,0.00048673185,0.00008140845,0.00026104882,0.5132214,0.0025613133,0.0017162184,0.10982496,0.3529603,0.00020649677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.783333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8251556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.216667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07875876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046332482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5714375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142348581","doi":"10.1017/s0008423902778165","title":"Partisanship as Political Science: A Reply to Rainer Knopff and F. L. Morton","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Politics; Charter; Political science; Position (finance); Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.04719938729891881,"score_gpt":0.32533493167130423,"score_spread":0.2781355443723854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142348581","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000120818135,0.0018946029,0.00006795171,0.9944782,0.003021737,0.0000015053937,0.0000071949457,0.000004104834,0.00040383093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0099801365,0.0043565137,0.00032078527,0.9482474,0.03465546,0.000024734665,0.000012253496,0.000039360824,0.0023634227],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877367,0.0063602426,0.0006143087,0.001716211,0.002706563,0.00086595566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9170386,0.06874966,0.002711363,0.0022939544,0.0062205163,0.0029859259],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022192298,0.0010567376,0.00240235,0.0019297953,0.008431359,0.009674811,0.004876456,0.050215933,0.0044768304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07727652,0.0011532003,0.0011692179,0.0027331612,0.020311592,0.017037243,0.005474342,0.056094665,0.0021674589],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037625854,0.000018866927,0.00017070447,0.000070315335,0.000014835396,0.00016608051,0.0014989601,0.00007948032,0.000057587185,0.050278813,0.9438217,0.0037850072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012746852,0.000039450675,0.00167872,0.00089583284,0.000049666658,0.00041726255,0.004165108,0.0008246402,0.00046492481,0.1826798,0.80847794,0.00017916843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018020203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01892619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050215933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008059163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072166515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11736548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143262688","doi":"10.1017/s0008423910000764","title":"Strategic Legitimacy Cultivation at the Supreme Court of Canada: Quebec<i>Secession Reference</i>and Beyond","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Supreme court; Political science; Context (archaeology); Secession; Law; Politics; Humanities; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.033147481482620436,"score_gpt":0.2890302107596631,"score_spread":0.2558827292770427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143262688","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76070833,0.0006835733,0.0015745623,0.015097207,0.00007938347,0.000057177058,0.00022208551,0.000034981713,0.22154272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932156,0.00009050818,0.00016356203,0.0002717498,0.000004267118,0.0000036151516,0.00002267152,0.0000034788497,0.006224483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767905,0.00031803077,0.00003692669,0.00025905573,0.00065252377,0.0010545234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99484384,0.0010563773,0.00048212236,0.000192902,0.0022751002,0.0011496147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017081228,0.00016637033,0.0002660567,0.001280801,0.015501849,0.007999781,0.0010953357,0.0015436705,0.007052944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060299775,0.00018203688,0.00024442008,0.0021359276,0.00943371,0.0016551166,0.0021181602,0.0020769273,0.00018461126],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008691029,0.0000826511,0.1192877,0.00009571106,0.000050868664,0.0026944152,0.104345866,0.0020129802,0.0025860134,0.6935857,0.023631463,0.051539674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050860162,0.00011353573,0.4316315,0.0004808687,0.00012627918,0.00054666423,0.22375204,0.0069674808,0.0023978953,0.058825828,0.27482072,0.0002864126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9909819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11602318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11602318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11555063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84181106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143589951","doi":"10.1017/s0008423913000504","title":"Governmental Interventions and Judicial Decision Making: The Supreme Court of Canada in the Age of the Charter","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Intervention (counseling); Humanities; Judicial review; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.028397993028168447,"score_gpt":0.293648021804498,"score_spread":0.2652500287763296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143589951","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8415507,0.006113857,0.0011756003,0.03050214,0.0001544049,0.000117992065,0.001455489,0.00004925584,0.11888046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924736,0.0007107388,0.0002501742,0.0014410254,0.000031219406,0.000012321407,0.00026372832,0.000010620349,0.0048065204],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9849585,0.0021596567,0.00032017575,0.0017338772,0.005211287,0.0056164926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9647219,0.012402308,0.0063013434,0.0014569232,0.010257267,0.0048602284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008014007,0.000249014,0.0009136978,0.0033032575,0.0166018,0.013963298,0.0027506603,0.0034129217,0.006250345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032330446,0.00046470689,0.0005031281,0.007186394,0.0116150575,0.002238838,0.0034142016,0.0047599366,0.00042197213],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061164435,0.00037554651,0.37718743,0.00028412222,0.00038261016,0.003908468,0.06868487,0.008580736,0.0015427567,0.36260277,0.1052466,0.070592396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018913059,0.0001018266,0.6859251,0.00088393304,0.00034758882,0.00032604,0.049809255,0.007517803,0.0016637836,0.04103476,0.21177603,0.00042468676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99074626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8515036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1484964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1563046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98762345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143819820","doi":"10.3138/cras.38.1.101","title":"The War against Terror as War against the Constitution","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of American Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Law; Supreme court; Rhetorical question; Constitution; Ideology; Conviction; Argumentation theory; Compromise; Political science; Pragmatism; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Politics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03979855664064228,"score_gpt":0.3216858850643154,"score_spread":0.2818873284236731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143819820","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03365276,0.04203492,0.0021232865,0.08136215,0.0036426985,0.00003475141,0.00008730424,0.000025266838,0.8370369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9366227,0.01164435,0.000649562,0.0077133016,0.0010854738,0.000037003796,0.00005590951,0.000027208365,0.04216448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962335,0.002464823,0.00009465163,0.0002471344,0.00061093597,0.00034900397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99763286,0.0016499163,0.00023015671,0.00015421164,0.00022876517,0.0001041006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031307286,0.00025125864,0.00017951702,0.0016664237,0.005078302,0.007349795,0.0005196168,0.003172072,0.0051083514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004391721,0.00015800053,0.00018371134,0.0014531222,0.016722674,0.004707255,0.0023072371,0.004477083,0.00054576877],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007792316,0.000005907138,0.00013846341,0.000031462718,0.0000027494962,0.00006867411,0.004870637,0.000080723876,0.00006434702,0.978205,0.0116815595,0.0048426082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016797907,0.000025272719,0.0013030923,0.0006233673,0.000012074283,0.00022138345,0.013430818,0.00018850523,0.0005183892,0.24607275,0.7375703,0.000017321794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011236405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016612617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011236405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007063865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050595184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051252186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144899749","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.291168","title":"Coalition Governments and Comparative Constitutional Design","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Public administration; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.05880997341948491,"score_gpt":0.31342134829786006,"score_spread":0.25461137487837515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144899749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13420723,0.0039053871,0.08534263,0.016378894,0.00026580787,0.00021932184,0.0002737885,0.00020496063,0.75920194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981588,0.00037406528,0.007402835,0.00045210304,0.00004080079,0.00017051365,0.000083709565,0.00005396136,0.009833943],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98234725,0.013277461,0.0003336169,0.0015510382,0.0012734084,0.0012171916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97108555,0.020877237,0.0013879585,0.0044641094,0.0014388515,0.0007462798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021296374,0.0004863655,0.0012847541,0.005046513,0.007139077,0.009422051,0.003023182,0.004432614,0.028392287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049010765,0.0007328573,0.0007231599,0.0053987494,0.02528928,0.011957706,0.004804296,0.0030995684,0.0007965413],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000099142335,0.0000067976484,0.00012193222,0.000012246006,0.000004024748,0.00000501428,0.00038384474,0.00031011543,0.000012262952,0.99638236,0.00032349257,0.0024280194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024920868,0.000014901906,0.00028691362,0.00002950828,0.000010204384,0.00001736778,0.0008094836,0.00068057067,0.00010454671,0.98886245,0.009154023,0.000005232368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043679094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007721854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028392287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011353078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069157584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11262733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146649806","doi":"10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.093008.131445","title":"After the Rights Revolution: Bills of Rights in the Postconflict State","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Law and Social Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Constitutionalism; Law; Politics; Political science; Fundamental rights; Bill of rights; Right to property; Democracy; State (computer science); International human rights law; Reservation of rights; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.013930297102848262,"score_gpt":0.3189139990728605,"score_spread":0.30498370197001223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146649806","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.095708326,0.06725206,0.005361452,0.2213336,0.0019189442,0.00004832933,0.00010533027,0.000038570324,0.60823333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9508681,0.011817277,0.0009959809,0.013891647,0.0015051562,0.000055472625,0.000047309626,0.00003517638,0.020783825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99467236,0.0026972871,0.00015960132,0.0004922846,0.0010825496,0.00089586683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99464285,0.0035603798,0.00046697946,0.00053193123,0.00051842316,0.00027954325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00789675,0.00016722901,0.00032078754,0.0015860867,0.004409684,0.008368301,0.0009200659,0.0040635616,0.003070673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015700834,0.00021766995,0.00036150508,0.00218992,0.030624049,0.01217872,0.0021771218,0.0070334356,0.0003351539],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034558445,0.0000024863898,0.000051633288,0.00000853192,5.89344e-7,0.000013337205,0.00063403853,0.000032953092,0.000015239469,0.9949883,0.0014147237,0.002834779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015128992,0.000018612227,0.0017598023,0.00019467417,0.0000050881254,0.000054773387,0.001421451,0.00016777671,0.00020218463,0.7884587,0.2076869,0.000014818132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011564275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01073133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011564275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009556917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004793313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069340646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146971893","doi":"","title":"Book Review – Good Government? Good Citizens?: Courts, Politics and Markets in a Changing Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Legitimacy; Political science; Charter; Legislature; Law; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Convergence (economics); Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.005730131055725373,"score_gpt":0.2428021907726298,"score_spread":0.23707205971690443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146971893","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014723999,0.9529804,0.00006914696,0.010262396,0.0068019773,0.000025117299,0.0002630151,0.000024297668,0.029426375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018255846,0.94422585,0.0001464134,0.007374323,0.005446627,0.000027665277,0.00039885764,0.000030582392,0.040524133],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916625,0.000095449715,0.000037253805,0.00007914546,0.00053343945,0.000088371235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974927,0.0006104648,0.00017230064,0.000050676346,0.0014380922,0.00023576681],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005875315,0.00084808405,0.001359942,0.003450433,0.0014189983,0.004835193,0.0015042372,0.0024351568,0.036934033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00299062,0.00040169063,0.00046939243,0.012215978,0.0015469784,0.0022220057,0.0009985898,0.0023730202,0.011448034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008922217,0.000011760412,0.000103355465,0.0020532247,0.000011707437,0.00003326625,0.000079031495,0.000080961865,0.000040089042,0.0025767602,0.9498028,0.045198094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029438058,0.000005650617,0.00053257676,0.0021077916,0.000008749401,0.000084699015,0.00007931788,0.000013090826,0.00001090585,0.00031330434,0.9968352,0.0000058651303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2583106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46444598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74168944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011969757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020553939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51361406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147029523","doi":"10.1017/s000842390177792x","title":"Reconciling Rights and Federalism during Review of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms: The Supreme Court of Canada and the Centralization Thesis, 1982 to 1999","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Political science; Charter; Law; Jurisdiction; Dual federalism; Original jurisdiction; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.013951069000208228,"score_gpt":0.24190595500660292,"score_spread":0.22795488600639469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147029523","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30633515,0.08777207,0.01755006,0.2895512,0.0030752146,0.0011314388,0.0014251524,0.00033436227,0.29282534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9500707,0.007675642,0.00422975,0.020687837,0.0007365845,0.00013686938,0.00025191522,0.00006579835,0.016144784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.93944114,0.0073119444,0.002940957,0.0047451193,0.033810508,0.011750351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8479294,0.07073985,0.011403935,0.0045241094,0.05963168,0.0057710432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043374535,0.0002687146,0.00086702715,0.0070789447,0.020190418,0.018566929,0.00312175,0.005993204,0.0011676162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16192807,0.0010472883,0.0006100014,0.009502727,0.021132782,0.0064171175,0.005951952,0.008031687,0.00009426025],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000104314626,0.000039782233,0.02011657,0.00042607248,0.00011524442,0.0011226623,0.0542058,0.002323039,0.0010421564,0.7522134,0.068609685,0.099681206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014214049,0.00008382443,0.16115119,0.0024161818,0.00031924868,0.0005058988,0.02652829,0.004567624,0.0037954752,0.15403709,0.6459161,0.00053691625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96230245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.982414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20554796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20554796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3060373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92145175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147732625","doi":"10.1177/0192512111432565","title":"Dialogue or compliance? Measuring legislatures’ policy responses to court rulings on rights","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Political Science Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Constitutionalism; Law; Parliamentary sovereignty; Supreme court; Judicial review; Political science; Legislation; Commonwealth; Parliamentary procedure; Law and economics; Sovereignty; Sociology; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.16455224401005697,"score_gpt":0.4442608147905704,"score_spread":0.2797085707805134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147732625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9509928,0.000504578,0.012680507,0.002988792,0.00006627257,0.0004160493,0.00018701178,0.000102327525,0.032061543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99445796,0.00015763691,0.0032724584,0.00062874804,0.00004756155,0.00046582392,0.00014864012,0.000016469703,0.00080471305],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.87701297,0.09564557,0.0057280418,0.0063556535,0.012417057,0.0028406368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.70925367,0.19990908,0.0585235,0.014829393,0.013774523,0.0037098755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06654398,0.0003379506,0.00083179405,0.003216085,0.0018210479,0.0046946495,0.0013363085,0.0037820428,0.002169379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26163113,0.0004909727,0.00045947867,0.004830205,0.004840156,0.004713293,0.0030179983,0.0031210198,0.00080525485],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00069269777,0.001768439,0.54911005,0.0011041681,0.0008047965,0.00021612304,0.17061615,0.006477011,0.012681397,0.059303667,0.0040875096,0.19313788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014086562,0.0015996646,0.8597693,0.0004536136,0.00020311073,0.00018449263,0.05634691,0.010606824,0.005692067,0.03830756,0.02648139,0.00021425942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002692923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020576564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06654398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023341707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027739687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3519224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148162120","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2012.00222.x","title":"Parliamentary and judicial ambivalence toward executive prerogative powers in <scp>C</scp>anada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Ambivalence; Political science; Law; Legislature; Parliament; Power (physics); Executive power; Statutory law; Humanities; Politics; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.03555248779724102,"score_gpt":0.2822290438318493,"score_spread":0.2466765560346083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148162120","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5922358,0.0014889506,0.0010911966,0.045760937,0.000178795,0.000056357923,0.000097051685,0.000033610737,0.35905725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942849,0.00014710167,0.00006613448,0.0011712606,0.000017892373,0.000004489478,0.0000048034976,0.000003886543,0.0042996155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98761415,0.002717397,0.00028992453,0.0009564978,0.004553443,0.0038685852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98118603,0.0071512396,0.0015306143,0.000561967,0.007225203,0.0023449005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008886104,0.000121850106,0.0002816568,0.0017016124,0.029027672,0.013734749,0.0011892323,0.0022708552,0.004169181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022127913,0.00031330742,0.00019199119,0.001816741,0.023583312,0.0017111022,0.002474302,0.004551356,0.00020254248],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007397872,0.00006203879,0.021057865,0.00008337943,0.000025532056,0.0011040972,0.13319919,0.00041078756,0.0014408824,0.80613923,0.019572543,0.016830554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006684137,0.00010183018,0.13772814,0.0005362362,0.00009659402,0.00055746397,0.318493,0.0016401287,0.0022742404,0.07620941,0.4620484,0.00024769772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9149085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9632249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08509147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.084030166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08096331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60968435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149371404","doi":"10.25071/1916-9272.34374","title":"The Precarious Future of Women's Equality: Access to Justice and the Court Challenges Program","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Public Policy Administration and Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.12277229383085636,"score_gpt":0.38885000188171753,"score_spread":0.2660777080508612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149371404","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29824868,0.009907972,0.002042216,0.25422165,0.0004987981,0.00015919331,0.000343554,0.000046668167,0.43453127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9564522,0.0019907546,0.00046660626,0.011438535,0.00012041665,0.00003635285,0.000048719958,0.000014872612,0.029431606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98593444,0.0015206484,0.00011256201,0.00050624873,0.004453058,0.007473018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923194,0.0023209192,0.0005770337,0.00020975087,0.0014578387,0.003115062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050839717,0.00020281516,0.00041352064,0.0017423499,0.023305338,0.015212597,0.0018335755,0.0038545378,0.0057780626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013923568,0.0002984836,0.00037545987,0.002130044,0.019068329,0.0036133563,0.004893844,0.005983446,0.00022664518],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005252773,0.000041387222,0.013557588,0.000076484335,0.000018023822,0.0007934031,0.023578696,0.0005751318,0.00035493687,0.88740075,0.032926723,0.040624432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060877555,0.0000891016,0.08018378,0.00071594433,0.000092132286,0.00051552634,0.08819839,0.0012476305,0.0011902185,0.10165856,0.72584254,0.00020531798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9862266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08679883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23934053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62977254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150123293","doi":"10.7202/040776ar","title":"In the Case of Federalism v. Charter: The Processes and Outcomes of a Federalist Dialogue","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalist; Charter; Federalism; Supreme court; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.049980608692396504,"score_gpt":0.357797620371223,"score_spread":0.30781701167882647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150123293","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13003479,0.0019773308,0.017596556,0.16647077,0.00081618706,0.00013611597,0.00021861594,0.00009044392,0.6826592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95967495,0.00031249947,0.0025549396,0.013884357,0.00013630443,0.000056534966,0.000044440872,0.000032170286,0.023303946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9803711,0.007300319,0.0003182982,0.0019177467,0.0049495692,0.0051429574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935829,0.0038380038,0.00041017923,0.00044342698,0.0012633047,0.0004621076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014725646,0.00031992077,0.0005252881,0.0012677587,0.0313652,0.0139735425,0.0019614543,0.012607148,0.003270558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028423192,0.0003729293,0.0007613581,0.0020552464,0.03250945,0.008420443,0.0055225464,0.013670947,0.00028087912],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009867288,0.00000458798,0.00025508378,0.000006175881,0.0000027320416,0.00010167241,0.009795213,0.0001034629,0.000056500034,0.9833899,0.0049288645,0.0013460336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007619955,0.000037694037,0.0029736385,0.00018230124,0.000061719395,0.0001920284,0.02776972,0.0012282173,0.0012535339,0.66221136,0.30388913,0.00012452582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6925395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74039143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3074605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043991867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05992423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6185423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150386089","doi":"10.1177/0192512114523461","title":"Building competition and breaking cartels? The legislative and judicial regulation of political parties in common law democracies","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Political Science Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law; Legislature; Political science; CONTEST; Competition (biology); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03299157741217985,"score_gpt":0.36497338028245957,"score_spread":0.33198180287027973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150386089","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48867542,0.003304831,0.013933916,0.015770884,0.00011192826,0.000078434765,0.00005159934,0.000045107194,0.47802797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955781,0.00029514826,0.00038455735,0.0006515559,0.000030113477,0.000024646557,0.0000074495647,0.0000073465158,0.003021062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880078,0.004857394,0.00033370836,0.0013985991,0.0024805379,0.002922002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98936486,0.0063710394,0.0018028378,0.0010208411,0.0008987694,0.0005417436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074405754,0.00013041403,0.0004257679,0.0018317682,0.0064979154,0.008545523,0.001297662,0.002419433,0.0040265876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016249554,0.000379044,0.00044201704,0.0021385024,0.02740232,0.0045434884,0.0033096643,0.0030978569,0.00035562145],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001023547,0.000016612094,0.0015594269,0.000021544813,0.00000800037,0.0000448613,0.005322389,0.00025638554,0.00046075563,0.9859126,0.00042759848,0.005959665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001367674,0.00017792874,0.05900973,0.00050871377,0.00012484108,0.00024017358,0.023003679,0.0029088848,0.0037499045,0.71516776,0.19484094,0.0001307191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04197561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059721984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04197561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007039699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0080263205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.083462596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151138624","doi":"10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110413-030532","title":"Law and Courts in Authoritarian Regimes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Law and Social Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":234,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Political science; Law; Human rights; Transitional justice; Corporate governance; Politics; Subject (documents); Rule of law; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Democracy; Economics","score_opus":0.020798648409496256,"score_gpt":0.3339173211579476,"score_spread":0.31311867274845134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151138624","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21403933,0.04820176,0.0096249115,0.07595475,0.0003893677,0.000049029473,0.00011695065,0.000040672727,0.65158314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859239,0.004257416,0.00075088604,0.0023449396,0.00028937976,0.000029269802,0.000021649113,0.000007721232,0.006374876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99381036,0.003592062,0.0002380462,0.00072065764,0.00084400346,0.00079498027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924878,0.0051302146,0.00102697,0.00042664565,0.00045786102,0.00047053417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059140907,0.0001426583,0.0004426615,0.0021468552,0.0063320897,0.010486206,0.0009486584,0.0042324816,0.0038311165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010961107,0.00029701373,0.00024279009,0.0023935225,0.048624244,0.008503509,0.004476012,0.00403736,0.0003311921],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024371889,0.000005277281,0.00025224173,0.000012906064,0.0000015157115,0.000021323558,0.0021741,0.0000900403,0.000036364,0.9949509,0.00042566343,0.0020272639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001759084,0.0000146016055,0.001954472,0.00017492582,0.0000052473065,0.000062337655,0.0034008406,0.00022641143,0.00009490266,0.9479857,0.046051312,0.000011560452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073054847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009642596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010486206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005006411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052371793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036324263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151831444","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1007","title":"Competing Constitutional Rights in an Age of Deference: A Bad Time to Be Accused","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07104288149708309,"score_gpt":0.34101486717061036,"score_spread":0.26997198567352726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151831444","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1416116,0.0176529,0.005136613,0.50960666,0.004212902,0.000032292628,0.00004525913,0.000056716905,0.32164505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94562805,0.0015784305,0.0005651222,0.031598464,0.0011347183,0.000015967244,0.000008954062,0.000022696411,0.01944754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99228036,0.0039093317,0.00016689845,0.00061087066,0.0013385823,0.0016940107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898555,0.0055001094,0.0008195384,0.0005577785,0.0011793792,0.0020875921],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010590062,0.00026196544,0.00043706704,0.001120862,0.01666636,0.010969449,0.0011422536,0.01010233,0.00434879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03240563,0.00031577842,0.00026724575,0.00057614833,0.03599085,0.01198816,0.0069356062,0.016237447,0.00051997876],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025319781,0.00002434088,0.0004946888,0.000017569337,0.0000032453793,0.000657812,0.04945217,0.00003654354,0.00014353363,0.924786,0.01640466,0.007954078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043314212,0.00009074751,0.0012763251,0.00029926852,0.000014847404,0.001231781,0.050537825,0.00020635698,0.00026306187,0.52054405,0.42543787,0.000054622607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0133553175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017759176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01666636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052213394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00813411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056006253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152602028","doi":"10.1017/s0008423902778153","title":"Ghosts and Straw Men: A Comment on Miriam Smith's ''Ghosts of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council''","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Mistake; Political science; Supreme court; Democracy","score_opus":0.05225425524564669,"score_gpt":0.27105401118617556,"score_spread":0.21879975594052886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152602028","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015031594,0.0036864076,0.0002070493,0.9795179,0.004165432,0.00001169684,0.000045977376,0.000029182193,0.010833085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03514265,0.0018138859,0.0003598016,0.9251035,0.0067768684,0.00007770932,0.000020474217,0.000109121334,0.030596063],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99245864,0.0030554396,0.00021642807,0.0011837687,0.0018030507,0.0012827106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98953384,0.0076120794,0.0006718578,0.0002529172,0.0012286323,0.000700511],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008141923,0.0010194067,0.0014548004,0.0009142198,0.024028994,0.011023199,0.005737401,0.05845648,0.006464889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022598589,0.0015649183,0.0012397092,0.0020271132,0.022240266,0.012631156,0.005336967,0.052242003,0.0015762375],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022030146,0.000009996247,0.00011085289,0.000052578373,0.0000062654854,0.0003425648,0.00782083,0.000059732367,0.00008478855,0.084966,0.90436697,0.0021574758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040767925,0.000027706448,0.00074388285,0.00040006047,0.000020474665,0.00022765277,0.011965591,0.00022671961,0.00044712488,0.027694305,0.9581384,0.00006730776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08569959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13673393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08569959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013130456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011829625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17040151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152664636","doi":"10.1093/icon/mol009","title":"Property rights and regulatory innovation: Comparing constitutional cultures","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Property rights; Political science; Intellectual property; Business; Law; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02586636513874751,"score_gpt":0.3019422523031773,"score_spread":0.27607588716442977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152664636","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7878387,0.0021830823,0.0051228395,0.0036580898,0.00005113335,0.00003551859,0.0000675252,0.0000115400435,0.2010316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987936,0.00034718483,0.0002853039,0.00010856419,0.000006757945,0.000011632013,0.000012432703,0.0000037490397,0.0004306666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.989272,0.005963888,0.0006722453,0.00074426417,0.0021711253,0.0011765738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9586022,0.026072793,0.005941609,0.003442687,0.004039441,0.0019012849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008626294,0.00012969872,0.0002909251,0.0024736547,0.0033517773,0.007110752,0.0006838255,0.00067653885,0.0031000315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041061353,0.00016106102,0.00033793593,0.0024128223,0.017648961,0.0062047103,0.0051934733,0.0021408235,0.00011279598],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011113422,0.00011332853,0.065583065,0.00013263467,0.000082702536,0.00021136343,0.09276715,0.0011894383,0.00088717445,0.78904796,0.0004125518,0.049461436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007890437,0.00027171534,0.22253774,0.00078384054,0.00015671107,0.00047126264,0.29365656,0.0029412853,0.003496497,0.4134095,0.061973598,0.00022237224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0174072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017045917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0174072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056868345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044296356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04562074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152896665","doi":"10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00068.x","title":"Accountability and Coercion: Is Justice Blind when It Runs for Office?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":342,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Impartiality; Coercion (linguistics); Accountability; Economic Justice; Power (physics); Social psychology; Sentence; Criminal justice; Value (mathematics); Political science; Psychology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.04572646034996888,"score_gpt":0.37910961808388594,"score_spread":0.3333831577339171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152896665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47586697,0.020000778,0.00902971,0.27427018,0.0012643994,0.000060829836,0.000271473,0.00009154642,0.2191441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99377584,0.0013944897,0.00024338395,0.0026549746,0.00041025534,0.000011547799,0.000015633635,0.000012475578,0.0014814156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918555,0.0043694004,0.00027939622,0.0007233085,0.0013358657,0.0014365136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96657383,0.016715085,0.009149023,0.0026394103,0.0021350698,0.0027875097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005823313,0.00021670516,0.00043485596,0.0021561135,0.0035281782,0.0065233023,0.00082044053,0.002422206,0.0059824055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057982836,0.0002789922,0.0002529542,0.001632217,0.01850041,0.00907405,0.003022327,0.0034417098,0.00052227883],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035361087,0.00024252011,0.15230729,0.00019795125,0.00007208094,0.0010264871,0.0242058,0.00051577296,0.0004448395,0.5809581,0.03236981,0.20730573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007453478,0.00016123253,0.11951349,0.0009845017,0.00009804122,0.0017748497,0.023148559,0.001983209,0.0006371873,0.78476024,0.06675514,0.00010907323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007645954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00784018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007645954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034491285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003553152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030797005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153859558","doi":"","title":"Unappealing: An Assessment of the Limits on Appeal Rights in Canada's New Refugee Determination System","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Refugee; Citizenship; Immigration; Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; History; Politics","score_opus":0.03712882396122151,"score_gpt":0.31755706181669535,"score_spread":0.2804282378554738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153859558","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6281074,0.007594604,0.0025539994,0.06139742,0.0002298836,0.00042089215,0.0011728542,0.00010570668,0.29841712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98341346,0.0014731265,0.0010033293,0.0041044094,0.000071985516,0.00008391932,0.00021306101,0.000033966764,0.009602794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93679094,0.007982467,0.0017453161,0.0029579243,0.035352245,0.015171075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.894287,0.043481123,0.0068829907,0.005162689,0.042409003,0.0077771787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033685993,0.00040898085,0.0009792364,0.006767603,0.022874445,0.025325667,0.00642353,0.0047043273,0.005759539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10072528,0.00086015824,0.0009177873,0.007882865,0.022573015,0.009129286,0.00968297,0.007944042,0.0002867272],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002421287,0.00022307348,0.06461583,0.00039204283,0.000110783156,0.0011137713,0.10582785,0.0024399331,0.0010468648,0.7259424,0.028243981,0.06980142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017326443,0.00032659768,0.45813373,0.0016866789,0.00040878984,0.00041811142,0.17677307,0.0084502315,0.0024270068,0.070053086,0.28045464,0.0006947326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9780602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9849358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20765378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20765378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22036013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9190093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154988461","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0003","title":"The Institutional Theory of Legal Interpretation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Interpretation (philosophy); Scope (computer science); Status quo; Law and economics; Dominance (genetics); Political science; Law; Legal realism; Legal research; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014877897780977298,"score_gpt":0.2264908908722523,"score_spread":0.21161299309127501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154988461","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005827955,0.0100493785,0.12251599,0.03722361,0.0005594735,0.00008846051,0.00018742919,0.00019620018,0.8233515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89474726,0.008375593,0.036488086,0.008314798,0.0015844511,0.00033182153,0.00023752195,0.00023004452,0.04969035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98732555,0.0059706704,0.0004843783,0.0014793732,0.0030803496,0.001659715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943494,0.0031538752,0.00048073247,0.0009265389,0.00083703024,0.00025247296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007941378,0.00082105445,0.0010120638,0.0036135176,0.006778172,0.01563244,0.0032030146,0.0058384663,0.007564852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011238699,0.0006498728,0.0014886927,0.0037045784,0.07458308,0.013989998,0.005310288,0.0074015562,0.0013315261],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.92971e-7,8.2416375e-7,0.000015670956,0.000007172627,0.0000014127379,0.000007397743,0.00021635028,0.00010220336,0.0000068919435,0.99856985,0.00042958432,0.0006417049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004940936,0.000002785725,0.00005845198,0.000041240673,0.0000033707436,0.000019145451,0.00020803895,0.00032405433,0.000038761314,0.97236437,0.026929926,0.000004955069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038893808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0219878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038893808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020760337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017641231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1506275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157873251","doi":"10.1177/0020715212439311","title":"Legal opportunity structure and social movement strategy in Northern Ireland and southern United States","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Comparative Sociology","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social movement; Mobilization; Irish; Political science; State (computer science); Openness to experience; Movement (music); Law; Sociology; Social psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.06464432359784192,"score_gpt":0.3618229870292625,"score_spread":0.29717866343142063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157873251","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93746454,0.00012523166,0.00014260814,0.0010502398,0.000008928595,0.00001715583,0.000013018153,0.0000030747858,0.06117522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99894446,0.000030171703,0.00003586852,0.000043037915,0.000002063825,0.000008295921,0.000006251838,0.0000012494831,0.00092858536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977927,0.0008257082,0.00005649045,0.00014365363,0.00026967286,0.00091177836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99738914,0.0006686832,0.0006223257,0.00008001934,0.0002206074,0.0010193645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018618442,0.000102289996,0.00018868282,0.002561001,0.0038965307,0.0054586353,0.0005716335,0.0006130829,0.0037324913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045134034,0.00012971851,0.0001520239,0.0013554276,0.009628491,0.0017414562,0.0052032336,0.0008446774,0.00019978685],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033536772,0.000660997,0.25132245,0.00010692242,0.000058884863,0.0014731208,0.28776076,0.001112626,0.0014046158,0.37152466,0.004442856,0.07979669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006447519,0.0002207686,0.43726167,0.00025504315,0.000021536287,0.00024042229,0.49530137,0.0013052693,0.0003020595,0.02465909,0.040308975,0.000059370097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059435215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15725984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059435215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010436922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049898825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11817855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159819816","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00299.x","title":"Does <i>the</i> Lawyer Matter? Influencing Outcomes on the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Test (biology); Political science","score_opus":0.021612247876357456,"score_gpt":0.2842204796590145,"score_spread":0.262608231782657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159819816","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9750744,0.0004505525,0.00008063138,0.0040076105,0.000019273915,0.000021993332,0.00024142294,0.0000054610673,0.020098636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99861336,0.00014131836,0.000025835185,0.000116704505,0.000007561186,0.000002190454,0.000059903505,0.000002382382,0.0010307209],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970235,0.00040677443,0.000066815286,0.0002675746,0.0011376302,0.0010976344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98282063,0.0035826815,0.003120906,0.0002940768,0.005268835,0.0049128113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023842598,0.00011884111,0.00029985266,0.0013474681,0.0049547,0.0038073,0.0010411772,0.00076022634,0.0058296714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021901809,0.00012334164,0.0002184719,0.001469652,0.002690185,0.00082131306,0.0015171581,0.001260751,0.00029328893],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016624041,0.00020054562,0.9304794,0.000045809207,0.00010150817,0.00075445627,0.011308591,0.0019090765,0.0006535638,0.008222391,0.011357242,0.0348011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015498219,0.000038351656,0.9766058,0.00007110848,0.000031462994,0.00007341819,0.0113181695,0.00092146744,0.0003343007,0.0010542594,0.009505421,0.000030856652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96631485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98866606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033685148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029649878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039785124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21512592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162736966","doi":"","title":"\"Regulating Impartiality: Electoral Boundary Politics in the Administrative Arena\"","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ANU Open Research (Australian National University)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Political science; CLARITY; Counterintuitive; Discretion; Ambiguity; Politics; Corporate governance; Delegate; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.4127872420931872,"score_gpt":0.4676606458836321,"score_spread":0.05487340379044492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162736966","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08186198,0.008798841,0.03306952,0.3534864,0.0038201057,0.00025981892,0.00008572668,0.00022160835,0.5183961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8844183,0.0031495711,0.004922918,0.038658544,0.00089865975,0.00029026842,0.00004658534,0.000095118325,0.06751992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9823302,0.011085064,0.00032062744,0.000846773,0.0031965245,0.0022207764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97870195,0.016210802,0.0012914977,0.00059921225,0.0024441099,0.00075238413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014417196,0.00044435496,0.00038023037,0.0013761708,0.023027876,0.01511064,0.0026908107,0.0086988965,0.0024115522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028862119,0.00040439455,0.0005204597,0.0019924073,0.044622015,0.006092672,0.0060317926,0.0064032055,0.00044980698],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012945871,0.000009989627,0.00067899894,0.00006141324,0.0000033800031,0.00027893475,0.073431686,0.00031244985,0.00011782276,0.8813282,0.034962423,0.008801773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026550533,0.000040893796,0.0042832657,0.0008245659,0.000043531054,0.0003107832,0.23936275,0.0013728302,0.0013132641,0.17645648,0.5758894,0.00007571886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12744668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21475226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12744668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019034155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02521363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25340974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162943359","doi":"10.1093/icon/mou032","title":"Eulogy for the constitution that was","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Politics; Law; Political science; Repeal; Statute","score_opus":0.041009427941542706,"score_gpt":0.33456745657305276,"score_spread":0.29355802863151004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162943359","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002161963,0.007732868,0.0053298324,0.062101394,0.0075811488,0.000060329083,0.00029307915,0.00018212333,0.9145572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18316258,0.005578189,0.005799171,0.04483076,0.003476191,0.00030970012,0.0006287045,0.0003842785,0.7558304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99786,0.00074179546,0.000105883206,0.0004975686,0.00054077146,0.0002539626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988445,0.0003495751,0.000090252346,0.00026042215,0.0003479948,0.00010711825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017174287,0.00035127864,0.00032820983,0.0008154891,0.0040391595,0.0064528603,0.00052067806,0.0044775335,0.044519562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005818139,0.00019310066,0.0003293134,0.000906014,0.0065460806,0.0035163087,0.0023455156,0.0069016125,0.012526026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007819029,0.0000034249329,0.000053727486,0.000022006987,0.0000017359595,0.000026155862,0.00040402802,0.000028460478,0.000055258643,0.93322515,0.05954185,0.0066303485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004909064,0.000005893551,0.0002002585,0.00009141305,0.0000022877214,0.0000477382,0.00018324549,0.00004404002,0.00005963464,0.047292702,0.9520624,0.000005430461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014310089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015393313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044519562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00450719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004106242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14893281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163572492","doi":"10.1590/s1808-24322012000100003","title":"Judicialização da política e controle judicial de políticas públicas","year":2012,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Direito GV","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.05734263990832818,"score_gpt":0.36152019259678186,"score_spread":0.3041775526884537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163572492","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11956384,0.006130035,0.008865734,0.020552779,0.00022310056,0.00006248284,0.00014385127,0.0000604519,0.8443978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9747678,0.001954802,0.0010714252,0.0009220451,0.000101927726,0.000018373143,0.00002609279,0.00001550358,0.021122014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938572,0.0022576526,0.00019620782,0.0008505885,0.0018611989,0.0009772034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927447,0.0038295325,0.0007653596,0.0010054151,0.0012026279,0.00045245577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042868606,0.00024144333,0.00040711125,0.0022962268,0.005987018,0.010463185,0.00080639555,0.0018352247,0.008704774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0112111475,0.0002427137,0.00036765618,0.002450271,0.013615278,0.0029211699,0.0018632582,0.0026455503,0.0004756643],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006456013,0.000006831849,0.0015438574,0.000036360387,0.0000049497985,0.00006400414,0.0026959397,0.00020706316,0.00021974678,0.98566145,0.0022119544,0.007341303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037524595,0.000075130294,0.04285171,0.0008259447,0.00007874683,0.00039443775,0.016514953,0.0033971362,0.0014911955,0.47200167,0.46226132,0.00007026246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06819054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12624173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06819054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009118138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011752861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13558728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163632303","doi":"10.1017/s0008423914001097","title":"Constitutional Design and Australian Exceptionalism in the Adoption of National Bills of Rights","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Sydney; Australian Government","keywords":"Constitution; Bill of rights; Political science; Exceptionalism; Statutory law; Legislature; Law; Parliamentary sovereignty; Legislation; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Public administration; Human rights; Politics; Sociology; Parliament","score_opus":0.0538156866212117,"score_gpt":0.31531485368088036,"score_spread":0.26149916705966864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163632303","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55789375,0.000508116,0.008991136,0.019777454,0.00016229664,0.00010438741,0.000053882697,0.00006981144,0.41243923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99343383,0.00006219584,0.0013767689,0.00066439476,0.00001090012,0.000024477557,0.000008927015,0.000010771466,0.004407675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97893256,0.011814025,0.0009251311,0.0019999314,0.0035128167,0.0028155474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98015827,0.009099653,0.0021029075,0.0035970318,0.0036145693,0.0014275232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02509506,0.00011621042,0.0004842842,0.0015518403,0.0106108105,0.007940119,0.0011764511,0.002185823,0.0032554453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034942757,0.00040694262,0.0003369003,0.0015567383,0.028091773,0.0034598524,0.006696177,0.004589158,0.0001984247],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019740419,0.000018762752,0.002630957,0.000027569706,0.000007067384,0.00016297142,0.035208914,0.00022032291,0.00032774042,0.95216286,0.000980573,0.008232561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004426468,0.00014451594,0.05396082,0.00040624806,0.00008617295,0.000464112,0.03498683,0.004363673,0.0018749614,0.62101984,0.28247938,0.00016917908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.083028294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10590534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.083028294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018027592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010138476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16509002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165498009","doi":"10.7202/1000630ar","title":"Complexifying Roncarelli’s Rule of Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Rule of law; Relevance (law); Political science; Due process; Notice; Exemplification; Common law; Sources of law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.14430199994377327,"score_gpt":0.3167429412609803,"score_spread":0.17244094131720702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165498009","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01563848,0.004479203,0.017985929,0.18210186,0.0034342129,0.00018564417,0.0002343613,0.00023597406,0.7757045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71854186,0.0019774358,0.015550326,0.14268328,0.0048166965,0.00041968684,0.00020318425,0.00019739885,0.11561021],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98889434,0.0028062414,0.00045315694,0.0025796883,0.0039544776,0.0013120762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99434596,0.002576473,0.00034603558,0.0009679805,0.00149347,0.0002701371],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009896064,0.0007156364,0.00071471016,0.0020739033,0.0056894184,0.010081712,0.0029377914,0.011860277,0.004467124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020667722,0.00042372255,0.0008776092,0.00074350514,0.02664114,0.006970232,0.0036673967,0.014890114,0.0017128534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057172865,0.000005927917,0.00009434005,0.000008106791,0.000001975924,0.00004995981,0.0009498956,0.000040084233,0.00006371058,0.9814269,0.0154647,0.0018886355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028174833,0.000028469296,0.0007011994,0.00016622084,0.000014817333,0.00013845581,0.0004950686,0.00075493666,0.00054237375,0.67617327,0.32090822,0.000048881044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037307255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03312283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037307255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010240635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006791816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0743013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165567558","doi":"10.7202/040775ar","title":"The Impact of the Charter: Untangling the Effects of Institutional Change","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Politics; Political science; Parliament; Federalism; Law; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology","score_opus":0.04526354565047421,"score_gpt":0.3596920869553529,"score_spread":0.3144285413048787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165567558","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39517024,0.012117478,0.008703723,0.05144097,0.0004624278,0.00029784488,0.00040694652,0.000093249786,0.53130716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934788,0.0012236048,0.0008994306,0.0012569237,0.000083243685,0.000025819436,0.000033378434,0.00002423366,0.0029746827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97471976,0.007890253,0.00047712322,0.001736393,0.008302347,0.0068741497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9550422,0.026825475,0.0042000334,0.0039752773,0.007567353,0.0023897006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018907772,0.0005741149,0.0010787192,0.0061561973,0.011609847,0.01686198,0.0026774232,0.0022055926,0.0068730344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05087486,0.0003787399,0.0010840007,0.006572585,0.045763206,0.008732913,0.0073887073,0.0043476587,0.00024116355],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016592028,0.000079672085,0.016348135,0.0001709542,0.00010436158,0.00017779884,0.011909802,0.0024710726,0.000383491,0.9244497,0.0023074108,0.041431747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019731709,0.00046718764,0.25989208,0.001133748,0.00067606114,0.00012334612,0.07785709,0.010023883,0.0030992846,0.41199082,0.23413296,0.00040629352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.76220953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7805768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90322393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09677609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07736228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.702163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166019106","doi":"10.1017/s0008423905250102","title":"Establishing the Rules of the Game: Election Laws in Democracies","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Presidential election; Notice; Reputation; Law; Politics; Compendium; Election law; Democracy; History","score_opus":0.019436680793203178,"score_gpt":0.2857009979528216,"score_spread":0.26626431715961846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166019106","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02853019,0.1299149,0.036285862,0.15178415,0.0013248635,0.00013686196,0.00029396283,0.0001573063,0.65157187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8610722,0.056979995,0.011084082,0.0064002904,0.0014375967,0.0002575717,0.0002488702,0.00008806708,0.062431376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972584,0.0016029218,0.00007671202,0.00012900878,0.00048104854,0.00045198516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945591,0.0042225155,0.00041175072,0.000192897,0.00039245808,0.00022126024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047314083,0.0006596561,0.00064188946,0.001365411,0.004710963,0.0111301765,0.0019456595,0.0045272172,0.0047948076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010324674,0.0007826937,0.0004242961,0.0032719558,0.022082252,0.008655754,0.0021256185,0.0048350166,0.0007396265],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006097764,0.000010656365,0.00016217411,0.000037257596,0.0000032003688,0.00002954179,0.0016063256,0.0007297842,0.000023343397,0.9784453,0.014282324,0.0046640895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019209967,0.000011760077,0.0013722841,0.0002356645,0.000009485602,0.0000343757,0.002718412,0.0014155792,0.00008623855,0.90434664,0.0897335,0.000016805321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06634044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08596489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06634044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013288561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00983779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1319086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W21665667","doi":"10.3732/ajb.89.4.664","title":"Abuse of Rights: An Old Principle, a New Age","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Criminology; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.05830837734920551,"score_gpt":0.3040873362336409,"score_spread":0.2457789588844354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W21665667","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007303651,0.020341037,0.011558755,0.14149694,0.009663717,0.00007569551,0.00026378562,0.00019833501,0.8090981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28678536,0.017426437,0.00844147,0.08206616,0.02052504,0.00033023994,0.0002542823,0.00070928014,0.58346164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99330467,0.0021069276,0.00046753348,0.0016489408,0.0016224454,0.00084944133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923971,0.0026860558,0.00041754602,0.002390873,0.0011914313,0.000917038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069169085,0.0004812812,0.00082571054,0.0008028834,0.0060024234,0.00975341,0.0015816491,0.007102442,0.02648468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013210409,0.0003818996,0.0004090912,0.00086775643,0.034270473,0.017613018,0.0067867143,0.011097616,0.008606479],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000147769615,0.00001181315,0.00036267505,0.0000363838,0.0000055537457,0.00013982123,0.0020641696,0.00002848627,0.00015736422,0.9199992,0.050503217,0.026676431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007752806,0.000014312154,0.00029615097,0.00014943561,0.0000049302257,0.00041597988,0.00069479534,0.00005481796,0.00008558579,0.09756603,0.9006963,0.0000139528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003850826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005857508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02648468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026653442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034280382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08860004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167854740","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1159","title":"Parliament’s Response to Charkaoui: Bill C-3 and the Special Advocate Regime under IRPA","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Law; Charter; Political science; Legislature; Supreme court; Constitution; Constitutional court; Constitutional right; Politics","score_opus":0.05935781489032223,"score_gpt":0.30931081651504316,"score_spread":0.24995300162472095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167854740","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08324333,0.0025432163,0.004386772,0.61380935,0.008987665,0.00035290257,0.00036205488,0.00056072045,0.28575397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32289886,0.00067790784,0.0029579753,0.4309039,0.0016679625,0.00021271907,0.00011519472,0.00022992345,0.24033557],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9823256,0.0019158024,0.00055190217,0.0015964983,0.006326488,0.00728374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928409,0.0028691124,0.0004058982,0.00024413737,0.0021949494,0.0014451011],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007914357,0.00049149105,0.0007083721,0.0009329711,0.027158529,0.01124163,0.0030809273,0.03305841,0.0057315505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023907611,0.0010610092,0.0013133222,0.00090704265,0.008227802,0.0020490647,0.0041817436,0.030060232,0.0015882349],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023276507,0.00009841824,0.0043535186,0.00014368686,0.000046929006,0.0063688955,0.024110602,0.0007854226,0.006848817,0.44572285,0.4927903,0.01849769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061962484,0.00007823743,0.0066699963,0.00018464582,0.00004836249,0.0005521098,0.0062168743,0.0009260329,0.0036438445,0.01559325,0.96579504,0.00022950044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67792517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79030806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32207483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053968143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050119355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64794314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168592881","doi":"10.1111/1468-2508.00126","title":"Selecting Appeals for Judicial Review in Canada: A Replication and Multivariate Test of American Hypotheses","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Generalizability theory; Appeal; Supreme court; Test (biology); Political science; Certiorari; Replication (statistics); Law; Psychology; Biology","score_opus":0.0659736452785146,"score_gpt":0.32696655501715616,"score_spread":0.26099290973864153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168592881","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99395645,0.00009540951,0.00044826398,0.0005219917,0.000018582647,0.00009373918,0.0005026398,0.000015428272,0.0043475297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978448,0.00005676315,0.00041393444,0.00011042784,0.000010630517,0.000026001475,0.0005218643,0.000014298528,0.0010013465],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98663205,0.0044285906,0.00045481077,0.002054951,0.0040143416,0.0024152275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94448334,0.018188564,0.0076920358,0.0058781705,0.018278388,0.0054795165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015352297,0.0007529505,0.001103301,0.0022167999,0.0097120665,0.0039838552,0.0032549114,0.0009386359,0.0068067904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05641546,0.00044672826,0.0011741464,0.005141496,0.0057501597,0.0017283617,0.0029741402,0.0027449904,0.00049011305],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009951313,0.00061081594,0.96538836,0.00004421395,0.00036554973,0.00018242301,0.008886939,0.00083982793,0.0004677044,0.0038697075,0.0043452475,0.0140041895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021764854,0.00015781836,0.97482556,0.00003567748,0.00029269885,0.0000737468,0.013818254,0.004517988,0.00045754618,0.0013681278,0.0041512265,0.00008378664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.983888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98554254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03178809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03178809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06004063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23063982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169202192","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1118163","title":"Executive Control and Legislative Success","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Control (management); Psychology; Business; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Law","score_opus":0.009194659230791389,"score_gpt":0.27761369471129715,"score_spread":0.2684190354805058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169202192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88735867,0.0011192498,0.00017370438,0.0063937264,0.000042542237,0.000015682986,0.00008265413,0.000012054138,0.1048018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964619,0.0001205267,0.00001424471,0.00014382339,0.000042588053,0.0000048987868,0.000023842207,0.0000031141492,0.0031849137],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966196,0.001246073,0.00011190747,0.00023072446,0.0004966402,0.0012950489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95821875,0.023132788,0.008120817,0.0012333511,0.0024465795,0.00684772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006698433,0.0002703165,0.0004987652,0.0026883997,0.0035518408,0.0067563686,0.0007164003,0.0021500282,0.01812033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026988164,0.00024457395,0.00027606366,0.0023489513,0.004385094,0.002607645,0.0021044512,0.0029108631,0.0012615662],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008704281,0.0014670464,0.7112496,0.00007898925,0.00020887326,0.0010633266,0.018233208,0.0010465663,0.00056846667,0.22423805,0.0080059655,0.032969452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023031607,0.00047145502,0.8323665,0.00016238236,0.00017299516,0.00041915124,0.04268348,0.002311914,0.0009303419,0.09180436,0.028382834,0.000064196865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063225525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012120655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01812033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013327149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023053687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06061852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169293164","doi":"10.1017/s1537592707072623","title":"Borrowing Constitutional Designs: Constitutional Law in Weimar Germany and the French Fifth Republic","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Weimar Republic; Constitutionalism; Political science; Constitutional law; Context (archaeology); Constitutional economics; Law; Politics; Comparative law; Comparative politics; Democracy; The Republic; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.033160930601302534,"score_gpt":0.31498430176629355,"score_spread":0.281823371164991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169293164","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21587841,0.30404848,0.002867656,0.18949191,0.0009741132,0.00004336249,0.00033166708,0.00008778279,0.2862766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96343064,0.019315047,0.00048092727,0.0027795807,0.00026054407,0.00003207026,0.000074922355,0.000014404433,0.013611805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971711,0.0020176282,0.000048144495,0.00014706216,0.00020416293,0.00041190948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857366,0.0010773531,0.00015452363,0.000051350366,0.00007590735,0.00006716495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033442876,0.00042352793,0.0003070037,0.0021047776,0.0052328785,0.006715727,0.00090898975,0.0028978842,0.0037005453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004257808,0.00029352697,0.00028362256,0.0035998141,0.011748862,0.0052502477,0.0018362367,0.0015229537,0.00018876811],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032812786,0.0000184042,0.0010688808,0.000072071576,0.000013420673,0.0001805652,0.015905105,0.00043832656,0.00009601385,0.9428448,0.017492218,0.021837236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005112541,0.000091114125,0.025880342,0.0010522351,0.00004957632,0.00029623634,0.032462724,0.0008942288,0.00031183314,0.34144822,0.5973623,0.000100028745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14030856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23186457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14030856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051111993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27898377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169720082","doi":"10.7440/colombiaint79.2013.02","title":"Asambleas constituyentes y democracia: una lectura crítica del nuevo constitucionalismo en la región andina","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Colombia Internacional","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015147336197191634,"score_gpt":0.2929968519468742,"score_spread":0.2778495157496826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169720082","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19178566,0.09512555,0.004487888,0.056731008,0.0009519175,0.000052447464,0.00019085761,0.0001005605,0.6505741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97581136,0.008168516,0.0008182984,0.0009957413,0.00021603983,0.00002367109,0.00003552401,0.000028594994,0.013902365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850947,0.0006192906,0.000063138636,0.00025202642,0.00024638156,0.00030968606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838316,0.0009856074,0.00017225982,0.00013975834,0.00020692914,0.00011233324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026259993,0.00035589756,0.00056532444,0.0014663816,0.006738042,0.007336288,0.00071870064,0.0017159284,0.004029595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038614152,0.00024834467,0.00023130963,0.0012750468,0.010641485,0.002976934,0.0029631795,0.0035001854,0.0002288708],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067301036,0.000018624572,0.0027550377,0.00045623528,0.000008831048,0.0002128384,0.031913333,0.00034143994,0.0003906653,0.9155569,0.005414256,0.042864542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034925473,0.000047643178,0.015242023,0.001327104,0.00006982394,0.0003213142,0.029318906,0.00065526407,0.0010264253,0.064916976,0.8869872,0.000052432148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0683233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14947644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0683233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011241099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004990555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13585126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170212252","doi":"10.1017/s1744552307004077","title":"Bills of Rights as process: the Canadian experience","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Articulation (sociology); Process (computing); Charter; Law and economics; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Product (mathematics); Fundamental rights; Law; Sociology; Public administration; Human rights; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03309545042952662,"score_gpt":0.3659922449062566,"score_spread":0.33289679447673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170212252","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18835597,0.008329234,0.0040203957,0.13896371,0.00101395,0.00023498523,0.00043632596,0.00012650198,0.6585189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9008913,0.005040248,0.0020146258,0.009085208,0.0000985325,0.00006504823,0.00012564231,0.00012323639,0.08255614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9746062,0.006749354,0.00056850654,0.0018761879,0.0091679925,0.007031717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98423517,0.006001929,0.00068764726,0.0006894616,0.004989178,0.003396495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013220837,0.000835374,0.0010196932,0.0031429764,0.09040851,0.019175205,0.00400664,0.008149038,0.011842012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025607686,0.000949067,0.00082651706,0.008758184,0.04887673,0.0073439665,0.007987749,0.012460674,0.0007966753],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059719347,0.000054309472,0.0020128677,0.00015194718,0.000010925818,0.0012908314,0.36218303,0.0005791988,0.00047444005,0.577577,0.03495653,0.0206492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003095031,0.00003583423,0.0030400837,0.00031605735,0.000020459578,0.00034570182,0.20370042,0.0005404653,0.00034452803,0.01597331,0.77549726,0.00015488295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99582493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31944343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.31944343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31996757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78934914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170984522","doi":"10.1353/wp.0.0004","title":"Courts and Judges in Authoritarian Regimes","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Politics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Legitimacy; Independence (probability theory); Bureaucracy; Power (physics); Political science; Judicial independence; Democracy; Accountability; Empowerment; Rule of law; Meaning (existential); Law; Law and economics; Political economy; Sociology; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.025589725471138473,"score_gpt":0.32374625112437155,"score_spread":0.2981565256532331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170984522","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16672198,0.04569747,0.0047660423,0.0936273,0.00087368535,0.000052938074,0.00005211188,0.000042816504,0.68816566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9726337,0.004593399,0.00051854865,0.0036956072,0.0005522575,0.000037343765,0.000011068523,0.000012947426,0.017945105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871177,0.008578982,0.0004105677,0.0006944335,0.0017005018,0.0014978008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9791823,0.015184206,0.0019409627,0.00060200517,0.0017150006,0.0013755548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0082206605,0.00011947377,0.0003960755,0.0019450596,0.007402439,0.012548647,0.0008596063,0.0036578039,0.0031229835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021481333,0.0003495997,0.00019377569,0.002551399,0.024870055,0.005120988,0.0035223905,0.004327321,0.00030428357],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009311387,0.000012702664,0.00077378756,0.00002941127,0.000002655852,0.00008757669,0.008432254,0.00012977418,0.000059204198,0.98179996,0.004044642,0.0046187057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070045324,0.00006255477,0.006847081,0.0004064502,0.0000140714355,0.00018710025,0.013295997,0.00060604064,0.00023583036,0.7885375,0.18970393,0.00003348731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006085275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011972684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012548647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006360122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059833834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046146154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171084651","doi":"10.1017/s0008423910000739","title":"Exploring Complex Judicial–Executive Interaction: Federal Government Concessions in Charter of Rights Cases","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Government (linguistics); Supreme court; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13768797842107863,"score_gpt":0.3486140388440552,"score_spread":0.21092606042297654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171084651","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9188477,0.0010435411,0.0013903223,0.003060606,0.000019645993,0.000081404905,0.00018212189,0.000014263773,0.075360425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975573,0.00016363499,0.00020253164,0.000224696,0.000015082923,0.000022957314,0.000060562048,0.0000051408906,0.0017481311],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98522794,0.0051110657,0.00040346285,0.001118489,0.0041790125,0.0039600236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93159896,0.05086403,0.011799148,0.0012762946,0.0030122336,0.0014492314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00946437,0.00022131825,0.0008754155,0.00554167,0.007829897,0.008503777,0.0016197939,0.002786914,0.007166479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042390577,0.00038395007,0.00044513078,0.008047773,0.009572894,0.004700589,0.0041930154,0.004044874,0.0003115863],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003124096,0.0007964017,0.3657689,0.00030202555,0.00025912933,0.0065808347,0.17423153,0.007548969,0.0010428476,0.38376504,0.0102321645,0.049159784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009035521,0.0001724878,0.6522321,0.00057607406,0.00018515866,0.000747992,0.22186148,0.008896142,0.001067097,0.059453867,0.05454611,0.00017106601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3966719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6262016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6033281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022873957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011994001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.788726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172283848","doi":"10.1017/s0008423907071363","title":"Misrecognized Materialists: Social Movements in Canadian Constitutional Politics","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Materialism; Politics; Constitutional theory; Constitutional law; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.032286514598969904,"score_gpt":0.3242228928127531,"score_spread":0.2919363782137832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172283848","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057425607,0.07350659,0.0030200675,0.5577958,0.0024901042,0.00007476756,0.00048603158,0.00010153929,0.30509946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9080651,0.02451621,0.0016791217,0.017364055,0.00082062057,0.000052431362,0.00015993186,0.00010824112,0.04723421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99463874,0.001451276,0.000086045875,0.00041501375,0.0020274173,0.0013814253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99529654,0.002475401,0.00029263375,0.00015964008,0.0011258407,0.00065004174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045548356,0.00059246086,0.0003294538,0.0047668763,0.032537665,0.016566223,0.0024159958,0.005060003,0.006736574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011385611,0.0004803547,0.00026962152,0.009699802,0.03817585,0.006977609,0.0037004943,0.005247937,0.0003508198],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023270526,0.0000125166525,0.0017318662,0.00009081866,0.0000065403524,0.00026391388,0.08745452,0.0002709093,0.00012208661,0.7191519,0.16684869,0.024022944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017735523,0.00000921207,0.014665575,0.0004724215,0.00002750132,0.00013864193,0.1234546,0.0007580382,0.00030001916,0.12388116,0.7361843,0.00009080835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9774515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9905415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1643663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1643663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11078243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96921664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2177845814","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1441","title":"Exchanging Constitutions: Constitutional Bricolage in Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Interpretation (philosophy); Law and economics; Charter; Political science; Law; Bricolage; Constitutional law; Globalization; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03576089819764377,"score_gpt":0.24850754259128638,"score_spread":0.2127466443936426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2177845814","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.265648,0.005250678,0.002197523,0.049533796,0.00036733784,0.00019941095,0.00033885342,0.00008812014,0.6763763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9196977,0.0023814896,0.0010075738,0.0076977764,0.000062165134,0.00006755179,0.00010688424,0.000051722775,0.06892715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99029726,0.001268512,0.0002723139,0.0010147722,0.003335178,0.003811918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99207413,0.0037218602,0.00040050186,0.0005381017,0.0023030562,0.0009623491],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006301474,0.00029529168,0.0004793742,0.002220111,0.052938465,0.013438138,0.0028199083,0.00465274,0.0065686726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016393373,0.000665775,0.0003588382,0.0052060876,0.022590527,0.003377179,0.0063802293,0.009347342,0.00031063272],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017293734,0.00002530875,0.0015790388,0.000037874204,0.0000087396,0.00068181794,0.036194872,0.00042767782,0.00030742993,0.9339478,0.012786831,0.013985348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000093464005,0.000045909772,0.018034237,0.00034354036,0.00007723538,0.00034458248,0.052101087,0.0020797262,0.0013621732,0.07438637,0.8509014,0.00023029174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9894112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99455535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18806502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18806502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23604158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9417295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2178076620","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511996399.023","title":"The impact of extra-judicial service on the Canadian judiciary","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Judicial interpretation; Arbiter; Judicial activism; Function (biology); Interpretation (philosophy); Service (business); Task (project management); Judicial review; Business; Economics; Computer science; Management","score_opus":0.05538109875264462,"score_gpt":0.2396837323284453,"score_spread":0.18430263357580068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2178076620","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07930411,0.021574933,0.0010356758,0.08706008,0.0012242794,0.00004253038,0.00030856396,0.000056990204,0.80939275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8321238,0.013825994,0.0010448867,0.015368941,0.00063238526,0.00003350899,0.0001770816,0.00008425967,0.13670906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98902786,0.0015266462,0.00012587136,0.00065573043,0.0047583203,0.0039054104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99161375,0.0020454254,0.00027483236,0.0002936359,0.0039055038,0.0018667965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004058416,0.00049526704,0.0004922239,0.003334437,0.0259015,0.009956572,0.0026064436,0.003010392,0.01285494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009247729,0.00042661495,0.00036376083,0.0056040464,0.01846698,0.002866991,0.004020536,0.0062842355,0.00079675956],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003552966,0.000022816012,0.0018397152,0.00010205669,0.000012588523,0.00025596438,0.019013587,0.00027728078,0.0003568429,0.86696386,0.063040905,0.048078764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031786178,0.000031833595,0.029241445,0.00055017445,0.000035432393,0.00017723022,0.020827852,0.00080046395,0.0004181656,0.04936998,0.898418,0.000097676835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99604875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17302355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17302355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21565193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95917547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2178976580","doi":"","title":"Canada and the Crown: Essays in Constitutional Monarchy ed. by D. Michael Jackson, Philippe Lagassé, and: The Crown and Canadian Federalism by D. Michael Jackson (review)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Monarchy; Cabinet (room); Federalism; Law; Throne; Miller; Sociology; History; Politics; Political science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.018469471603243727,"score_gpt":0.25226119102484107,"score_spread":0.23379171942159735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2178976580","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011421965,0.97081673,0.000045357112,0.020110149,0.0019138685,0.000004339858,0.00006643922,0.0000060233942,0.006923017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010051869,0.95755994,0.00019741688,0.012764839,0.0032377632,0.000022681006,0.00024472023,0.000040082123,0.015880639],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954861,0.00068888546,0.00017399839,0.00035278246,0.0023109692,0.0009872835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99608696,0.0011226654,0.00029389045,0.00012883599,0.001569554,0.0007980866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003929087,0.0012219574,0.0019052922,0.0048113503,0.008715372,0.010285204,0.0031297302,0.005426313,0.014741296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009126042,0.00072459545,0.0010037945,0.015531395,0.014781449,0.0070677763,0.003405885,0.006283158,0.0027570638],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021000013,0.000014686821,0.00027144994,0.0016421055,0.000027557046,0.00006812867,0.0014194761,0.000125701,0.00005401962,0.03777484,0.8914974,0.06708361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059444096,0.0000026550942,0.0017295402,0.0030653425,0.000011564472,0.000049521183,0.0010199713,0.000014295953,0.000016403998,0.0045431736,0.9895237,0.000017861066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82985866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9022634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17014134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07070786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14231583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51302385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2180908303","doi":"10.5287/ora-ryzz9jaka","title":"Implied constitutional principles","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliamentary sovereignty; Constitution; Legislation; Law; Political science; Adjudication; Interpretation (philosophy); Sovereignty; Constitutional law; Argument (complex analysis); Judicial review; Judicial interpretation; Law and economics; Constitutional economics; Common law; Constitutional theory; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.056443926534300755,"score_gpt":0.3057745821083418,"score_spread":0.24933065557404105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2180908303","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008734887,0.0068556434,0.09473626,0.031621985,0.0013145047,0.00028055537,0.0007517737,0.00037449552,0.85532993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6726026,0.0084070265,0.09704335,0.02658281,0.0019661894,0.00070593983,0.00137613,0.00043716707,0.19087887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9811032,0.0030728844,0.0008730531,0.0029760876,0.0097695105,0.0022052124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99108607,0.0029762564,0.00047692226,0.0017624287,0.003319627,0.0003785757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013687727,0.00070072047,0.00083090167,0.003055088,0.0067043556,0.010034472,0.0046579633,0.00516154,0.016240776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01697821,0.000536236,0.0011025144,0.0023446442,0.022884596,0.0067956713,0.0043362756,0.0072718873,0.002810582],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014581866,0.0000011990461,0.000028147615,0.00001645915,0.0000013460838,0.000013912423,0.00035551423,0.000057772286,0.000040418112,0.9945897,0.0017726712,0.0031214445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017918555,0.000013310647,0.00044927353,0.00022680468,0.000019216546,0.000111497684,0.0004349406,0.0005601996,0.00027874197,0.496953,0.5008987,0.000036314003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19259188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20422418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19259188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018960834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032914393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38294172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2181249333","doi":"10.5235/108546811799320844","title":"Judicial and Political Decision-making: The Uncertain Boundary","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judicial Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Politics; Judicial opinion; Boundary (topology); Judicial review; Political science; Judicial activism; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07119389565167876,"score_gpt":0.3685869565634812,"score_spread":0.29739306091180245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2181249333","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0061855074,0.30781507,0.031077128,0.57015127,0.0029825377,0.00008158724,0.00033825616,0.000074815274,0.0812938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74114126,0.13014849,0.018195676,0.08559357,0.017987678,0.00047585784,0.00023653854,0.00012723065,0.0060936706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94578755,0.034301836,0.002548722,0.0030124541,0.012193158,0.0021561338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8003088,0.17529204,0.0068965037,0.005001417,0.010608942,0.0018923227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0600047,0.00090044964,0.0019237706,0.0041413126,0.006722878,0.018721841,0.002397009,0.013196424,0.005385132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15168163,0.0010734214,0.0010348236,0.0045016245,0.04221447,0.03150027,0.00600985,0.014596139,0.0014241054],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005759364,0.0000164327,0.00032485698,0.0002302272,0.000033907185,0.00010688348,0.001267106,0.00065771246,0.00006328906,0.9358345,0.041647878,0.019759605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021877826,0.00000862253,0.0003604788,0.00035279302,0.000013729809,0.000033701857,0.00030430677,0.0003366267,0.000046982266,0.9732484,0.025253609,0.000019002113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00618537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0101622725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0600047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010758472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012868822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31733894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2181985537","doi":"10.5287/ora-141mkzmmr","title":"The impact of implied constitutional principles on fundamental rights adjudication in common law jurisdictions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Political science; Law; Common law; Commonwealth; Appeal; Fundamental rights; Comparative law; Law and economics; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.039807210017130376,"score_gpt":0.3202354008130628,"score_spread":0.2804281907959324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2181985537","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30039918,0.0037139014,0.099847384,0.040685013,0.0004825216,0.00040824973,0.000088850546,0.00009402315,0.5542809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869986,0.0006250778,0.0060765906,0.0017676848,0.00015595932,0.00013457618,0.000020334595,0.000032434436,0.004188627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8604245,0.100977555,0.0045799105,0.0052691326,0.021148052,0.0076009417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7315699,0.23963025,0.007856491,0.009746522,0.009934946,0.0012619572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06939567,0.0004201783,0.0008127789,0.0024754875,0.0075073545,0.017100973,0.003244472,0.007208785,0.0074822204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1933152,0.0009624614,0.0012753329,0.0023827134,0.055272643,0.02390933,0.017279904,0.01379809,0.000648389],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014718014,0.000018048371,0.000651466,0.000037514365,0.0000060501884,0.000079980135,0.0034315004,0.00048653779,0.00010313879,0.9904178,0.00023361019,0.004519658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006837102,0.00011561308,0.0024863933,0.00055902783,0.00006346328,0.00020636104,0.00696449,0.004099915,0.0010231076,0.9589317,0.025416568,0.00006506325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007325001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060798125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06939567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009638676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0097622285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36700374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2184492925","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1283","title":"Research Note: All But One: Solo Dissents on the Modern Supreme Court of Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Majority opinion; Typology; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.07049475175959699,"score_gpt":0.3324198818464073,"score_spread":0.2619251300868103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2184492925","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58820164,0.0055920086,0.0015700466,0.08789681,0.0005777532,0.00007735466,0.0005382274,0.000023569057,0.31552267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9801695,0.0014389204,0.0003714813,0.0034581942,0.00009695948,0.000010862255,0.00004520746,0.000010325569,0.014398566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99588084,0.0007740627,0.00006889349,0.00042562955,0.001653789,0.0011968435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939175,0.0021903324,0.0005459458,0.00021123725,0.002222188,0.0009128125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033631986,0.00022203941,0.00038186173,0.0021433104,0.028484188,0.0051453514,0.0011926481,0.0019608382,0.0039050812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009942557,0.0001309641,0.00018966151,0.0040541105,0.020536639,0.00260297,0.0025685984,0.0035317168,0.000233684],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008522353,0.000062094456,0.025394928,0.00013088093,0.00002521236,0.0006641973,0.2386567,0.00057356554,0.00047167914,0.65205336,0.050954964,0.030927153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034225865,0.00005610021,0.07112683,0.00057924195,0.000060907925,0.0003844268,0.41076687,0.001399172,0.0015177254,0.11525895,0.39862722,0.00018840545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9543659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9857606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059185445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059185445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06607019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4294225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2185102743","doi":"10.30958/ajl.1.1.1","title":"Pragmatism and Judicial Restraint","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Athens Journal of Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Political science; Psychology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.07593698312700299,"score_gpt":0.338577253990625,"score_spread":0.262640270863622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2185102743","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45910236,0.008855807,0.014620435,0.04889833,0.0003204668,0.000019818059,0.00001932472,0.00004346947,0.46811998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962786,0.00041169647,0.00031932606,0.0007045073,0.000058984097,0.000006468378,0.0000020868465,0.000005685072,0.002212635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99256754,0.004431209,0.00025925838,0.00068228954,0.0014627111,0.0005970394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98859173,0.00663759,0.0019456538,0.0013038255,0.0011131811,0.00040793387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048488737,0.00016293344,0.00026572158,0.0011408671,0.0054952623,0.004944787,0.00091558846,0.0021085488,0.0015697709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016413538,0.00018881203,0.00021227563,0.0013305944,0.037479375,0.004033483,0.0046278047,0.0050281635,0.00018553756],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008921025,0.000013585617,0.0009708477,0.0000191509,0.0000042237384,0.00006647044,0.022390446,0.000119656615,0.00018285013,0.9682469,0.00042480777,0.0075521306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004285019,0.00004926104,0.0057823937,0.00040353063,0.000016093376,0.00033919138,0.017711706,0.0008532839,0.00075177365,0.89556533,0.078439385,0.00004528594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040900446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036690126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054952623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036093004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040613334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02618742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2185131023","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1212","title":"Book Review: In the Public Interest: the Report and Research Papers of the Law Society of Upper Canada's Task Force on the Rule of Law and the Independence of the Bar, by the Law Society of Upper Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Law; Political science; Task (project management); Task force; Rule of law; Bar (unit); Sociology; Mathematics; Geography; Public administration; Economics; Management; Statistics","score_opus":0.03429307079856945,"score_gpt":0.2821942873073713,"score_spread":0.24790121650880184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2185131023","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00049468636,0.24292344,0.00045189974,0.24270026,0.32905412,0.00044808426,0.0039496506,0.00032684926,0.1796511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003765669,0.10367891,0.00034155184,0.05742621,0.08405462,0.00026446575,0.002122916,0.00023992316,0.7481058],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944543,0.00041857024,0.0002251508,0.0003713237,0.0040205335,0.00051006075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9736921,0.003758778,0.0008465276,0.00061103806,0.01925583,0.0018357139],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033276347,0.0014312951,0.0031601333,0.00681951,0.0035191902,0.0093366895,0.0038545541,0.008449002,0.0902819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01970116,0.00086342316,0.00083878986,0.011775001,0.0026029747,0.00343256,0.0015718312,0.005130048,0.055341233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021057058,0.0000022389056,0.000015389014,0.000057181704,0.0000012321483,0.0000039131196,0.00000395212,0.000009292804,0.0000063995503,0.00012822667,0.99720216,0.002568031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007478736,0.0000054884827,0.00038478937,0.0004091455,0.000008553684,0.00001390247,0.00003190393,0.000023341348,0.000020738815,0.00026624507,0.9988201,0.000008143516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18586776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48931357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8141322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01746513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042356282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36957175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2187207196","doi":"10.11575/prism/38477","title":"Notwithstanding the Override: Path Dependence, Section 33, and the Charter","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Legitimacy; Politics; Law; Establishment Clause; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Legislature; Sociology; Supreme court; First amendment","score_opus":0.06634911045113165,"score_gpt":0.3143838268088106,"score_spread":0.24803471635767896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2187207196","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29115003,0.0060044206,0.010509643,0.06320511,0.00043773477,0.00007124804,0.00013717724,0.000035134068,0.6284495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9826079,0.000623751,0.00067141786,0.003355263,0.00007363057,0.000019672087,0.0000244402,0.000016132124,0.012607659],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955781,0.0014377884,0.000076015414,0.0004338959,0.0014023634,0.0010718998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948376,0.0031105885,0.0005708337,0.0003659961,0.00090137357,0.00021363415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006085382,0.00020698259,0.00025198507,0.00092913874,0.008864281,0.007195678,0.0010983554,0.00244201,0.002491264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010739954,0.00023102376,0.00019586808,0.0014797688,0.028028958,0.005172867,0.0021146557,0.0053964583,0.00014278977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063616585,0.000002697444,0.00039655095,0.0000052075875,5.8201283e-7,0.000039679268,0.004128806,0.000048630616,0.00004683433,0.9912571,0.0015596132,0.0025079623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039438306,0.000063742016,0.014196578,0.00037080105,0.00003321466,0.0002577822,0.023439037,0.0013302041,0.0010554504,0.6558441,0.3032639,0.00010576627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.50901335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.56417215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49098665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019797405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028846566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9877563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2187276640","doi":"","title":"Safeguard the Authority of the Constitution: Comprehensively Promote the Cornerstone of Ruling the Country by Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cross-cultural communication","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cornerstone; Constitution; Safeguarding; Law; Safeguard; Political science; Constitutionalism; Democracy; Geography","score_opus":0.061787941519389114,"score_gpt":0.3584552499727784,"score_spread":0.2966673084533893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2187276640","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07997805,0.0077917315,0.03989448,0.14608787,0.0012678378,0.0003192925,0.00009952175,0.00017051246,0.7243906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95807624,0.0021385641,0.013004819,0.010870483,0.0005285249,0.00013184028,0.000043209122,0.000046263474,0.015160123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99057263,0.00475844,0.00044801144,0.0008135784,0.0023820284,0.0010253524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986231,0.0072465027,0.0011622562,0.001613219,0.002337884,0.0014091682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014961126,0.00021569795,0.00033479813,0.0012321989,0.0056209164,0.008553614,0.0008360759,0.0032794133,0.0029207545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023866558,0.00021759921,0.0002099924,0.0010334216,0.023766289,0.006451543,0.0041918173,0.0063191713,0.0006392225],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004252544,0.000025425172,0.00059071963,0.000052489355,0.000004336099,0.0000676759,0.010339278,0.00010143905,0.00042454933,0.968112,0.0050123944,0.015265532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025239515,0.000050236624,0.0038873688,0.0007179383,0.000023494065,0.00019350433,0.009203679,0.0003683241,0.0011826563,0.6705258,0.31377682,0.00004502422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005334049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068204883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014961126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017220177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0791229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2189092689","doi":"","title":"Modelling the Formal Division of Legal Authority in Canadian Constitutionalism","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"MacSphere (McMaster University)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Division (mathematics); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03068214086792979,"score_gpt":0.257301192286838,"score_spread":0.22661905141890823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2189092689","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23199414,0.0013998982,0.090903,0.012681645,0.00019880755,0.00036888648,0.0029189645,0.00034188372,0.65919274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93562305,0.0008015727,0.03197492,0.0002846247,0.000046827226,0.00014448832,0.0005905634,0.00007011014,0.030463811],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981711,0.000332559,0.00004401254,0.00022825251,0.0005603844,0.0006637559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99787664,0.0006473202,0.00017264548,0.00021309295,0.0007725245,0.00031779904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018019102,0.00048131213,0.0005116472,0.002266965,0.005162101,0.0058574006,0.0024987676,0.0019686008,0.009531436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068099503,0.0005706825,0.0009536712,0.0032739642,0.0073190914,0.0025188087,0.0024280224,0.0018898443,0.00064916903],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018089,0.00001365652,0.0014574347,0.00002348444,0.0000068755994,0.00009052456,0.001187069,0.060674123,0.00020496223,0.9304094,0.0021843067,0.0037301113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000118955475,0.00003186942,0.0057927296,0.00014818458,0.000048920178,0.000115651965,0.0028079923,0.4059152,0.00034891642,0.4749726,0.1095727,0.00012625052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9692486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9735303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08832171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08832171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056246858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6408218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2193413","doi":"","title":"Chronique de jurisprudence constitutionnelle canadienne 2000: le traitement jurisprudentiel des droits a l'egalite","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue du droit public et de la science politique en France et a l'etranger","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Jurisprudence; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.013972477641432196,"score_gpt":0.28753044133112227,"score_spread":0.2735579636896901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2193413","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52489394,0.10686686,0.0037847632,0.21527784,0.0046472736,0.0003463946,0.00022892961,0.00015419809,0.1437998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9446633,0.016318602,0.0014816443,0.015072081,0.0013823754,0.0003445782,0.000095601,0.00007109126,0.020570792],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935028,0.002791174,0.0003432473,0.0003911759,0.0016271662,0.0013444866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851951,0.008700873,0.0017889859,0.00042232958,0.0014610235,0.0024316292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004727225,0.0003507653,0.0005152772,0.0027235511,0.00754813,0.0058543747,0.0010232272,0.004772343,0.0070951455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031009747,0.00037411004,0.00030335377,0.0033229126,0.0071173906,0.0021717108,0.004403931,0.006957689,0.00078699976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029252842,0.00045007048,0.06970382,0.0007686453,0.00006663954,0.013630189,0.14557841,0.0010024628,0.003288139,0.30962095,0.0863861,0.36921203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005905512,0.0002464564,0.054426678,0.0009131763,0.000022211578,0.009349543,0.035871405,0.00034220214,0.000664329,0.008867194,0.88914734,0.00009045878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03894404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042470027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9901349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009865113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011161537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07743472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2193855736","doi":"","title":"It Takes A Vision: The Constitutionalization of Equality in Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.059176632631270876,"score_gpt":0.3046179178950782,"score_spread":0.24544128526380732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2193855736","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056445844,0.012240584,0.005630008,0.28078598,0.002256675,0.00013797842,0.00051261147,0.00013382807,0.6418565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.909236,0.004233949,0.0028824748,0.030903475,0.00029286378,0.00006554516,0.0001030085,0.00007319305,0.052209478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98799396,0.0017403754,0.00027537366,0.0010640463,0.004553181,0.004373074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922403,0.0018868137,0.00027748587,0.0004044054,0.0035388893,0.0016520486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067361975,0.0003537268,0.0005583128,0.0016708983,0.03196393,0.015823003,0.0020401457,0.004442846,0.004002701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01567254,0.00042264024,0.00040842642,0.0028973334,0.032847352,0.003421585,0.004099468,0.009006599,0.00020989611],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008989547,0.00000688711,0.00056769187,0.000022548651,0.0000051723596,0.00008327894,0.007502929,0.00025901105,0.00011145643,0.95792997,0.02675415,0.0067480174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000390245,0.000031323892,0.008737332,0.00030547119,0.00005209973,0.00010204241,0.023671567,0.00096437143,0.0006178084,0.20884046,0.7564298,0.00020873804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9946456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9962196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17934757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17934757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32486737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9518405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2196217095","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1039","title":"Case Comment: Mack et al. v. Attorney General of Canada - Rethinking the Contemporary Conception of Judicial Discretion and Justice","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial discretion; Discretion; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Judicial review","score_opus":0.061486698478188495,"score_gpt":0.33806912484068713,"score_spread":0.27658242636249863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2196217095","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06852299,0.003555246,0.000659818,0.7341576,0.00316429,0.00019812971,0.0007572733,0.000104686995,0.18887998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34955233,0.0027087836,0.00048355258,0.463751,0.0011503024,0.00015998178,0.00014885413,0.000065898275,0.18197927],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99706393,0.00018319195,0.00007436421,0.00036782387,0.0007366053,0.0015740915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865663,0.0003740716,0.000120492434,0.00006398774,0.00037479505,0.00041009372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012616742,0.0006408946,0.00034695497,0.0007945392,0.029508768,0.0043345755,0.0029138403,0.022324756,0.010668936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004663843,0.0007035523,0.0007444353,0.0017776078,0.007310854,0.0016264382,0.0022002114,0.017778516,0.0008937845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012003736,0.00005058403,0.013606031,0.0001502532,0.000036451405,0.010267145,0.026053293,0.0003526584,0.00067180087,0.15152891,0.78471565,0.0124472305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008909406,0.000041728326,0.019158902,0.0006022314,0.00010745626,0.004114626,0.035891548,0.0006118929,0.0008183652,0.014345188,0.92400354,0.00021535682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9625698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9848408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046428442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046428442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.074090585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33686352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2197273205","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511770630.015","title":"Constitutionalised emergency powers: a plague on Asian constitutionalism?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Invocation; Political science; Constitution; Constitutionality; Law; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.03509510797279821,"score_gpt":0.24667522089690805,"score_spread":0.21158011292410983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2197273205","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07285037,0.012175941,0.0036949555,0.028888475,0.00059268175,0.000026918775,0.000047362384,0.00004278288,0.8816805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89742446,0.008650922,0.0013132044,0.0067831096,0.00041475426,0.00006174386,0.000043971842,0.00007481867,0.08523303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860245,0.0005930781,0.000078656,0.00013231172,0.00029967655,0.00029384892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986105,0.0006976408,0.00012350116,0.00022233091,0.00023646833,0.000109608125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003919402,0.00028136183,0.00028202843,0.00049686834,0.004315872,0.007362971,0.0007204016,0.0011068681,0.0044448143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002408419,0.00018894981,0.00022436609,0.001366058,0.017299972,0.006595027,0.0028131627,0.0071395095,0.000461995],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003864567,0.000005494785,0.00013448135,0.00003108445,0.0000016780551,0.00008477112,0.027319841,0.00005678577,0.00009734316,0.9631541,0.0028057618,0.006304788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020794809,0.000034102002,0.002237868,0.00045717793,0.000015440766,0.00033702503,0.059187293,0.00042151118,0.00072587485,0.3143921,0.62214017,0.000030666863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011459778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02048499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011459778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053204508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006725547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03860271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2197325417","doi":"","title":"Administrative Tribunals and the Constitution: Reclaiming the Grail","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Law; Supreme court; Jurisdiction; Political science; Statute; Economic Justice; Constitution; Original jurisdiction; Judicial review; Nova scotia; Statutory law; Sociology","score_opus":0.031001477369231617,"score_gpt":0.3132962776162683,"score_spread":0.2822948002470367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2197325417","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044881735,0.007261774,0.008956179,0.32769758,0.0017965444,0.000065473585,0.00016854334,0.000105060535,0.609067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8690549,0.0015789322,0.0023511888,0.039674878,0.0009142324,0.00007926413,0.00006937952,0.0001283175,0.086148866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901001,0.0027044257,0.0002560164,0.0008389805,0.0027173366,0.003383101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99476707,0.0026642065,0.00023670241,0.0005255781,0.0013919019,0.00041450062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010272209,0.00037099086,0.00059077604,0.0017143927,0.020476194,0.016418526,0.0027975368,0.011565795,0.004625747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016658258,0.0005262731,0.0005812409,0.0018284834,0.06478084,0.0069417274,0.005469085,0.014439694,0.0006605507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023809835,0.0000017707845,0.000058093716,0.000003674042,8.701169e-7,0.000022176378,0.0016381164,0.000042609576,0.000025637368,0.9938443,0.0035670116,0.0007934925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004993356,0.000016390948,0.0014276261,0.00022406047,0.00002037596,0.00009126491,0.009374346,0.00048623097,0.00032809234,0.5421282,0.4457949,0.00005856639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6373912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.73147196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6373912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037020504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.063196585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7294885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2198078807","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Exemptions: An Ongoing Problem Requiring A Swift Resolution","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Political science; Legitimacy; Legislation; Legislature; Law; Doctrine; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03726322335472885,"score_gpt":0.30672317147724387,"score_spread":0.269459948122515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2198078807","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008239168,0.010137094,0.010917232,0.95532113,0.0030898044,0.000045030083,0.000048626527,0.000059983475,0.012141791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48433658,0.034805927,0.065477565,0.36798176,0.023369778,0.00045402587,0.00015076257,0.00028834702,0.023135215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9456418,0.022457391,0.0046237763,0.0066806586,0.017959096,0.0026371323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8103489,0.15240003,0.007554048,0.009904943,0.015061286,0.0047308314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08054687,0.0005708696,0.0018786623,0.0026364005,0.010708579,0.015261438,0.0065573934,0.026963087,0.0052056205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13472714,0.00092863437,0.0011804461,0.0022170362,0.046169274,0.030593727,0.010231841,0.049098607,0.001152346],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021813716,0.000101144265,0.00053400005,0.00019177928,0.000017494747,0.0003391987,0.0028188976,0.0005374658,0.00031372847,0.91748327,0.0327309,0.044910368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070860435,0.000060530252,0.00071513286,0.0009281536,0.000014757284,0.0005784241,0.01064003,0.001040791,0.00034531738,0.7964958,0.18897519,0.00013503648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061250767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0080711255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08054687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009671646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026421018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42597765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2200636444","doi":"","title":"Introduction to the IALS Conference on Comparative Constitutional Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; European union; Human rights; Law; Political science; Common law; Constitutionalism; Comparative law; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Geography; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.2015297628570199,"score_gpt":0.3722443008915306,"score_spread":0.1707145380345107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2200636444","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00095961476,0.13870563,0.0054022055,0.11813892,0.053830806,0.00013724992,0.00062713044,0.00018332731,0.6820151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04484203,0.07802825,0.005814375,0.05889617,0.041515123,0.00097018876,0.0010297064,0.000573162,0.76833105],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99567187,0.0020175201,0.00023427591,0.00056147476,0.0011131375,0.00040177532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99612385,0.0021761283,0.00013842277,0.00055679167,0.0006425606,0.0003621808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072519667,0.0011861309,0.0013128895,0.0056062415,0.006051255,0.016382964,0.0022454092,0.007373444,0.050578557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012666047,0.00065242033,0.0017619486,0.004728802,0.013003497,0.009413261,0.00803895,0.013235016,0.01111482],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016447062,0.000033236847,0.00013511856,0.00014887923,0.000008130519,0.00006175279,0.00086895295,0.00018299646,0.00008845679,0.43067893,0.5358846,0.031892583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027824228,0.0000041327157,0.00012071888,0.00064348907,0.0000018045305,0.000019348907,0.00028889085,0.000033124037,0.000027573005,0.026140895,0.97271144,0.000005894615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010982737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014225233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050578557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013296278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063231336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16920215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201174992","doi":"10.1017/s0008423915000530","title":"Questioning Judges with a Questionable Process: An Analysis of Committee Appearances by Canadian Supreme Court Candidates","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University; The King's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Interview; Parliament; Political science; Law; Politics; Government (linguistics); Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.022907291950736274,"score_gpt":0.3041602519042559,"score_spread":0.2812529599535196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2201174992","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9800229,0.00054917304,0.0006576886,0.0011609386,0.000055242323,0.00028570037,0.0014153753,0.000024603052,0.015828324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940705,0.00027379813,0.00085544016,0.00026040556,0.000034518813,0.00014730521,0.0013522301,0.000022714199,0.0029830926],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97351235,0.008016385,0.0009320443,0.0021460888,0.011421503,0.0039717555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88905156,0.045338012,0.017312681,0.0034800416,0.037342697,0.007474992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019762736,0.00042774435,0.00072857965,0.007415109,0.008470872,0.0053422926,0.0025067376,0.0016763406,0.0035424328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09917184,0.0004811844,0.00046333196,0.0115514565,0.0035174887,0.0012027405,0.0029294703,0.00199642,0.00060050923],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004372511,0.00023252126,0.7955322,0.00033944755,0.00012227525,0.00064133183,0.14003496,0.0004977432,0.0021843007,0.004217499,0.016079918,0.03968054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012301578,0.00003318377,0.9069903,0.00013237783,0.000032516156,0.000057635196,0.06953127,0.0010578542,0.0003232479,0.00033196417,0.021424068,0.00007327566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9080637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9440539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9724995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02750053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024432693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19953126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201715422","doi":"","title":"International Human Rights Law in the Supreme Court's Charter Jurisprudence: Commitment, Retrenchment and Retreat – In No Particular Order","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Charter; Political science; Supreme court; Human rights; International human rights law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01111871589753691,"score_gpt":0.29258825410188016,"score_spread":0.28146953820434323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2201715422","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029075418,0.043078072,0.008913987,0.32656267,0.0046390016,0.00008793964,0.00021063538,0.00013658378,0.5872957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81897503,0.013027534,0.0046748635,0.10477631,0.0031663068,0.00010929297,0.00019612172,0.00017804762,0.054896493],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9821311,0.0040348223,0.0005555558,0.0021783614,0.007067217,0.004032884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879341,0.006938453,0.00065265043,0.0009600104,0.002560141,0.0009546166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01640331,0.00046427833,0.00079589564,0.0019990145,0.014294881,0.033492815,0.0033468413,0.011778941,0.0019782768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02780078,0.0005495211,0.0006168428,0.0035099774,0.056862008,0.008658733,0.0040122764,0.022289662,0.0003620345],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029073415,0.0000047869585,0.00010940829,0.00001623076,0.000002419379,0.00004986513,0.003912168,0.00009854173,0.00004694194,0.9763484,0.014848767,0.004559616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020943062,0.000022043543,0.0024387832,0.0010163502,0.00002840663,0.00009845868,0.011361459,0.00087133236,0.0005340997,0.40235078,0.5811435,0.000113788636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7270628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7513923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7270628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.055914458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09042071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5490891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201732302","doi":"","title":"Limiting Constitutional Rights","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Charter; Legislature; Fundamental rights; Law; Law and economics; Constitutional law; Judicial review; Constitutional economics; Substantive due process; Adjudication; Democracy; Substantive rights; Human rights; Constitution; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.01583266659409008,"score_gpt":0.2871945297077946,"score_spread":0.27136186311370447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2201732302","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016492808,0.0030503666,0.09747664,0.019303521,0.00077121664,0.00018405083,0.00022578913,0.00030415563,0.86219156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8341774,0.0036794813,0.033257216,0.014814813,0.0016870967,0.0008181314,0.00037896397,0.00037128376,0.11081564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9823705,0.0060087075,0.0011279233,0.0039633326,0.0048351474,0.0016943116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818154,0.008691577,0.0010901589,0.005627127,0.002261274,0.00051451486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013916872,0.00082168955,0.00091544585,0.0015500461,0.004838351,0.010101109,0.002453147,0.0051550358,0.018662047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02749388,0.00074409525,0.0008663528,0.0010983407,0.027821716,0.011829703,0.009697215,0.007241192,0.0038134959],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002657042,0.0000046623827,0.000076676144,0.000015694342,0.0000022867594,0.000014458387,0.00071174285,0.0000977007,0.00020891991,0.9940211,0.0009794112,0.0038647074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016762378,0.000026108175,0.00021132916,0.00017841069,0.000014230497,0.0000992332,0.00060563796,0.00039702706,0.0011055925,0.80127645,0.19604939,0.000019820083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003420966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041280906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018662047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005198351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073552867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07360029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2205053112","doi":"","title":"'Remembrance of Things Past': Early Encounters with the Constitutive Laws of Others","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Constitutional law; Jurisprudence; Law; Constitutional theory; Autonomy; Political science; Sociology; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.014257599370401004,"score_gpt":0.2520512547176614,"score_spread":0.23779365534726038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2205053112","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01854786,0.097156234,0.008438748,0.4440442,0.055326182,0.000038303024,0.00007302397,0.00009013155,0.3762853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6975251,0.061198153,0.003543542,0.08012195,0.063007295,0.00012722533,0.000095817806,0.00042911206,0.093951866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888009,0.00690826,0.00025848398,0.0010502465,0.0021521924,0.0008299269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97879595,0.017549101,0.0008772133,0.00083910034,0.0012476813,0.0006909545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011082811,0.00054491294,0.0007726509,0.0021406868,0.015563703,0.02213708,0.0024126295,0.0069947415,0.0031678078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020009985,0.00046731552,0.00056127383,0.002013177,0.053422097,0.021086687,0.0046903496,0.015537089,0.0006057341],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014981394,0.000008091125,0.00015905651,0.0001237018,0.0000055095547,0.00025369716,0.12213491,0.000030014508,0.0000636681,0.8150773,0.053984277,0.00814485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073328456,0.000019201296,0.00046674197,0.00087510864,0.000009045397,0.00033714512,0.04176214,0.000086731154,0.00015910882,0.093778454,0.86246836,0.00003055877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009725848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018557144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02213708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008455289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055500194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061347723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2205513482","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005932","title":"The Coxford Lecture: Judging The Judges: “May They Boldly Go Where Ivan Rand Went Before”","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Globalization; Constitutional law; Constitution; Common law; Rule of law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.013849219066436026,"score_gpt":0.2602579865963203,"score_spread":0.2464087675298843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2205513482","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029885073,0.091371894,0.00055002095,0.80795634,0.04774861,0.000010396384,0.00003445212,0.000042114516,0.05198738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0681057,0.08837781,0.0026077104,0.40113288,0.091897815,0.00011973934,0.00013361305,0.0004024415,0.34722233],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99419963,0.002505369,0.00019405647,0.0008118727,0.0016499961,0.0006391546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877714,0.0069798483,0.00036795685,0.0003472077,0.00244165,0.0020919226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074599795,0.00094439497,0.0007284637,0.001353452,0.010711388,0.012295758,0.0015814435,0.010294979,0.017448934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02289272,0.00089983986,0.0005174458,0.0009948247,0.01233251,0.012831339,0.002116656,0.021738745,0.008271394],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013541502,0.000009728756,0.000080228034,0.0000323585,0.0000029354003,0.000025222273,0.00040045445,0.000024378076,0.00003785857,0.033698153,0.95450324,0.011171922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010939572,0.000007834497,0.00039209324,0.0005311397,0.000004172028,0.000043203723,0.0011012185,0.000080627855,0.0000827992,0.02831092,0.9694066,0.000028525377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06518054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12634344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93481946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012342759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011841185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12960231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2206315762","doi":"","title":"Social and Economic Rights in Canada: What Are They and Who Can Best Protect Them?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Human rights; Political science; Social rights; Competence (human resources); Law; Social equality; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.014917040463458259,"score_gpt":0.24582604097679303,"score_spread":0.23090900051333477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2206315762","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057645407,0.044570457,0.0014504328,0.6299096,0.0010050208,0.00008230892,0.0006803593,0.000067025256,0.26458943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90288395,0.036687605,0.002398825,0.031926826,0.00047907617,0.000057389523,0.0002797349,0.000040406692,0.02524621],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891935,0.0012224247,0.00017357075,0.0004911145,0.0043095713,0.004609904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98935634,0.0016194243,0.0005739838,0.00025537363,0.0037467948,0.0044479524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006178741,0.00051056466,0.0008709025,0.0037269457,0.025698435,0.014467923,0.002000024,0.0031401464,0.00820353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013865004,0.00033035895,0.00045809447,0.005206999,0.03324466,0.006213553,0.0051740226,0.0064464896,0.00039996637],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028352435,0.00004501081,0.013054558,0.00026134375,0.000030107127,0.00018850651,0.020809373,0.00036731776,0.00017927942,0.77785885,0.059701074,0.1274763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004465517,0.00003566766,0.085856475,0.0024405164,0.000092969305,0.00017287004,0.092356235,0.0007899995,0.0003658239,0.1884608,0.62917054,0.00021341044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9947391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99782795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17791592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17791592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35524297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.953501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W220720050","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511498893.004","title":"The Critics' Case","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Judicial review; Democracy; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Enforcement; Legislation; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.029890337295410956,"score_gpt":0.2320442511581436,"score_spread":0.20215391386273263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W220720050","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022491796,0.007969551,0.003804372,0.4193975,0.0070091523,0.00013515378,0.00008530963,0.00009067775,0.5390165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5163194,0.0039963755,0.0020922031,0.30475733,0.006647249,0.00049859285,0.000096072974,0.0001873947,0.1654054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9843068,0.005681154,0.00052278896,0.0019847157,0.0050621564,0.002442468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980457,0.011927215,0.0011491186,0.0012849957,0.0037031937,0.0014784049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016420089,0.0004105856,0.00076088303,0.0020666125,0.011541856,0.010500396,0.0021580842,0.01781042,0.010815581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060555346,0.00039634312,0.0006095521,0.0015592915,0.01883864,0.0052487585,0.004582141,0.015765311,0.0017567682],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022570955,0.000039479903,0.0009764333,0.0000857276,0.0000072098187,0.0014547058,0.0035276206,0.00012515736,0.00010602575,0.8377736,0.14723699,0.008644563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061406616,0.00002922451,0.0009197426,0.0005284449,0.00002344478,0.0016648322,0.0044496255,0.0006060505,0.00027414106,0.14603709,0.84536684,0.000039181337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008202064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009375046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01781042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007829842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068126633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08683872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2209081423","doi":"","title":"Private Law and the Rule of Law: Introduction","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Public law; Law; Municipal law; Comparative law; Philosophy of law; Statutory law; Political science; Presumption; Civil law (Civil law); Commercial law; Due process; Common law; Boilerplate text; Rule of law; Doctrine; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.006720396320282656,"score_gpt":0.24311547818501375,"score_spread":0.2363950818647311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2209081423","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0078955665,0.14102651,0.017615626,0.04594593,0.0060624536,0.00017402413,0.00065106904,0.00016679936,0.78046197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36001924,0.22536276,0.017276801,0.033734635,0.026357105,0.0008948191,0.0016689147,0.00043547558,0.3342502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990165,0.0003556393,0.000037125657,0.00018454767,0.00026406386,0.00014210277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986426,0.0008932206,0.000076066084,0.00009142619,0.00019641205,0.00010019966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001133537,0.00068886706,0.0006006806,0.0017094308,0.0021178669,0.006770739,0.0012107043,0.0040342514,0.014496166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030814926,0.00054757844,0.00055355876,0.0022697528,0.007772909,0.00822446,0.002900418,0.004465738,0.0026911818],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008412099,0.000027405935,0.00011084119,0.00015495662,0.0000029219448,0.000040606614,0.0013325497,0.00032929113,0.00006206099,0.94885665,0.039097838,0.009976502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057549687,0.000026468062,0.0005189265,0.0004025323,0.0000042447637,0.000088248584,0.0007737942,0.00031012634,0.000039418683,0.45325723,0.54456395,0.000009281183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034666527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022421575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014496166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041168854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020774622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048494518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2209976097","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2992","title":"The Conventions of Constitutional Amendment in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Nortel (Canada); University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Constitution; Law; Democratic legitimacy; Convention; Political science; Democracy; Constitutional amendment; Legitimacy; Politics; Supreme court; Federalism; Sociology","score_opus":0.022409243237246128,"score_gpt":0.26300720225143637,"score_spread":0.24059795901419023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2209976097","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025869371,0.00791427,0.0072033484,0.047576316,0.00092333526,0.000268267,0.0008255061,0.0002954539,0.9091241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81409705,0.004606362,0.011933395,0.013089152,0.00031090734,0.0002895348,0.0005529034,0.00017146494,0.15494922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9782446,0.0039581405,0.00117975,0.0023714304,0.009202499,0.005043527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877437,0.0032266628,0.00074316113,0.0015025759,0.00559447,0.0011895212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01040914,0.00046426128,0.00070415967,0.0028621135,0.023965223,0.014073859,0.0024129108,0.0048239566,0.006389792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025347179,0.0006690909,0.00054881023,0.00454299,0.021360962,0.0026671651,0.0048709847,0.00779273,0.00060077885],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065477466,0.000006050653,0.00037674094,0.00002160875,0.00000509179,0.00004830951,0.0022185289,0.00047634216,0.00010405003,0.97514516,0.015027596,0.006563887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004325175,0.000020088817,0.0063880384,0.00027027342,0.000030981548,0.000069743604,0.0024190377,0.0016222579,0.0005211158,0.15437202,0.83408517,0.00015799016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9823093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9823062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1752352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1752352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2566115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95661026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2210147736","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i1.4539","title":"Dishing up Israel: Rethinking the Potential of Legal Mixité","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Judgement; Dialogic; Context (archaeology); Political science; Legal history; Sociology; Israeli law; Common law; Religious law; Black letter law; Comparative law; Private law; Geography","score_opus":0.05974086345521199,"score_gpt":0.32363465804989083,"score_spread":0.2638937945946788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2210147736","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22893718,0.0068654586,0.010951794,0.058937922,0.0006075496,0.00005472449,0.000039167084,0.000061308565,0.69354486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98535013,0.00084422226,0.0012612611,0.002727731,0.000105920895,0.000027941205,0.0000115463645,0.000039611547,0.009631621],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956055,0.0027476428,0.00006985445,0.00029099223,0.00065883267,0.0006271044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99445677,0.0040556397,0.00023653223,0.000378929,0.00042779857,0.00044424276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008211791,0.0003121161,0.0003710434,0.0018440727,0.011269458,0.016807225,0.0016560387,0.003804937,0.0058609555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0094476715,0.00028510284,0.00023425954,0.0011821041,0.04192357,0.012848697,0.011635768,0.0061954204,0.00042850286],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012367665,0.000012955739,0.0005366491,0.000019337642,0.000002386952,0.00016908794,0.040986,0.00005994057,0.00007645859,0.9449133,0.0018423938,0.011369146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026014959,0.000051005496,0.0014214298,0.0005933612,0.000012631574,0.00030606365,0.12889399,0.0010520432,0.0006062439,0.72120386,0.14579906,0.000034245662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070404853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014160771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016807225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009378537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003990722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06804639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2211408476","doi":"","title":"Defining the Charter: Judicial Activism and the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Centrality; Context (archaeology); Scholarship; Political science; Judicial opinion; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.009114417248697318,"score_gpt":0.24146629236731806,"score_spread":0.23235187511862074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2211408476","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92575616,0.0027898522,0.0018219656,0.0028393273,0.000045273253,0.00007924839,0.023886364,0.000052215153,0.04272972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897691,0.0005804327,0.0009012787,0.00007046997,0.0000142885665,0.00001573392,0.0058047175,0.000015041931,0.0028289908],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791473,0.00022266516,0.000100608086,0.0003274424,0.0008417066,0.00059269543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921101,0.002091106,0.0016944032,0.00027725875,0.0026904005,0.0011367564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014685427,0.00021185284,0.00040295476,0.009552088,0.004377837,0.004559047,0.0010640206,0.00052595744,0.0035692372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014463952,0.00015330024,0.00018791761,0.021672968,0.001789206,0.0012299728,0.0015793759,0.0007407499,0.00028469105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000111910886,0.000054543136,0.775352,0.00029115027,0.00009093051,0.0006960799,0.020923799,0.006571101,0.0006873129,0.082651414,0.04247758,0.07009203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016302252,0.000015206821,0.8809319,0.00015041335,0.0000471442,0.00018100748,0.014626643,0.009774292,0.0005434559,0.010719722,0.0829318,0.000062124025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9880931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99570316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042279024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042279024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030868292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3067572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2211764790","doi":"","title":"The Proportionality Standard and Constitutional Culture: A Comparative Analysis of Rights Adjudication in Canada and the French Republic","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Adjudication; Political science; Law; Human rights","score_opus":0.027848066770329485,"score_gpt":0.2898196199180951,"score_spread":0.2619715531477656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2211764790","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9492176,0.0019477318,0.00045816554,0.0033235375,0.000022797125,0.000036461508,0.00015267372,0.000010385148,0.04483074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976406,0.0003841146,0.00017809813,0.00017486306,0.000003876045,0.000008088847,0.000043536988,0.000006177202,0.0015605349],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99144626,0.0023500896,0.00022389465,0.00048640752,0.0029913194,0.0025021278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869801,0.0049545,0.0011394378,0.00032637236,0.005526198,0.0010734383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055824555,0.00016717258,0.00065488537,0.0062020915,0.016078362,0.0069066836,0.0013075804,0.00083943596,0.003053469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017000211,0.0002245769,0.00038444452,0.010364635,0.011261225,0.0016867627,0.0026031914,0.0015933703,0.000103448976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003071326,0.00016807424,0.18076041,0.0003895817,0.00018108524,0.001526949,0.3662692,0.002583736,0.002404449,0.3425916,0.0071594077,0.09565838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039299368,0.00009321576,0.5683839,0.00039006313,0.00009173962,0.00025795493,0.33124557,0.0019724984,0.0010539,0.0065255514,0.08978966,0.00015668187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9901687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9948055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17562501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17562501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10597926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95615816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2212773715","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199264063.003.0007","title":"Rights and Democracy: A Reconciliation of the Institutional Debate","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Democracy; International human rights law; Law and economics; Fundamental rights; Separation of powers; Law; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Constitution; Politics","score_opus":0.028763839981942072,"score_gpt":0.2500757557775318,"score_spread":0.22131191579558976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2212773715","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011798307,0.037170794,0.046397794,0.18846738,0.0014834333,0.000046470843,0.00005718902,0.00008659339,0.7144921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89058614,0.026272682,0.014299445,0.011900941,0.0034109286,0.00019536087,0.00008331017,0.00017286585,0.053078443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903562,0.006974288,0.00018897139,0.0004997323,0.0014858592,0.00049490045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907047,0.0068226564,0.00030638612,0.0010571275,0.00075156195,0.00035755936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011810929,0.00047111016,0.00077660265,0.0037159843,0.003825554,0.01755159,0.0018088975,0.004676222,0.009448474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009834948,0.00032819324,0.0005096887,0.0030146886,0.049668808,0.020691667,0.0070667258,0.008021459,0.0007743038],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010245572,0.000002453506,0.0000052714818,0.0000062748927,4.1466458e-7,0.00000565025,0.00035826513,0.00007415688,0.0000056837202,0.99733824,0.00056746055,0.0016349028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046171785,0.0000037212758,0.00003095052,0.00012370932,0.0000011994836,0.000011411368,0.00090478634,0.0002471233,0.0000347786,0.9511702,0.047464326,0.0000030729834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021513146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023431848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01755159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01090975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008042252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07915616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2214023420","doi":"","title":"Demystifying the Boundaries of Public Law: Policy, Discretion and Social Welfare","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Public policy; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Administration (probate law); Government (linguistics); Administrative law; Legal doctrine; Public administration; Public economics; Economics","score_opus":0.02183490505607357,"score_gpt":0.2959328215407892,"score_spread":0.27409791648471565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2214023420","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11773888,0.019610725,0.056919746,0.4241415,0.0008065452,0.00012523237,0.00016810479,0.00014612873,0.38034305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98116344,0.0015691195,0.005690887,0.0069762794,0.00043737638,0.00010281169,0.000028095574,0.00004776653,0.0039842203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97735834,0.012961259,0.0010894155,0.0017778978,0.003896294,0.0029168495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95896065,0.0279308,0.0031694567,0.004334927,0.0030339768,0.0025702412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026578438,0.00033372547,0.0008293529,0.0035311517,0.008107439,0.020701248,0.0024952425,0.007983277,0.0028704621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04167854,0.0005686778,0.00064985926,0.0020073624,0.0916188,0.019399155,0.01204178,0.013030133,0.0003596696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069382663,0.00001074133,0.00026737334,0.000013974229,0.0000022114634,0.000021185686,0.002892541,0.00022553347,0.000070216425,0.99205655,0.0006744185,0.0037583646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000090487265,0.000009236978,0.0006575171,0.00013490584,0.000004195599,0.000025311845,0.002158125,0.00036826657,0.00010503832,0.98339015,0.013123394,0.0000146947905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01084299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008599577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026578438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013020736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023016147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14056194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2215116227","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1086","title":"Interventions at the Supreme Court of Canada: Accuracy, Affiliation, and Acceptance","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Appeal; Intervention (counseling); Law; Psychological intervention; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Parliament; Sociology; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.02787806851561254,"score_gpt":0.29585967950311465,"score_spread":0.2679816109875021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2215116227","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94610906,0.0011150093,0.0010079218,0.008235273,0.0000706127,0.00021423945,0.0002980747,0.000031315256,0.04291841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99662447,0.0001849138,0.00020697144,0.00071481895,0.000035043442,0.000027482889,0.00007391324,0.0000047906533,0.0021276053],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9595462,0.010006397,0.0010649286,0.0027306338,0.01859733,0.00805453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.874159,0.058174,0.032704566,0.004783536,0.01982073,0.010358118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019350192,0.00024345674,0.0006614434,0.002143396,0.010297385,0.005297659,0.0025488688,0.0030643444,0.00585541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14972581,0.00033466218,0.00034178785,0.003087123,0.007605927,0.001783813,0.0038259027,0.0042120465,0.00057107204],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006363382,0.0005002792,0.83048636,0.0001995629,0.00027139983,0.00089627475,0.0365588,0.001935434,0.001213546,0.040652636,0.010268827,0.0763806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001281096,0.00024055762,0.9470295,0.00029638968,0.00024263562,0.00019130207,0.017511887,0.0024143246,0.0011407409,0.0067065665,0.023968937,0.00012912705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8419357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9090088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1580643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027634315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051277637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3179903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2215504162","doi":"10.7202/1034055ar","title":"The Supreme Court in a Pluralistic World: Four Readings of a Reference","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Narrative; Pluralism (philosophy); Political science; Legal pluralism; Sociology; Notice; Plural; Majority opinion; Legal realism; Legal research; Epistemology","score_opus":0.11519907970680078,"score_gpt":0.32922301917405444,"score_spread":0.21402393946725368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2215504162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19046587,0.012071077,0.015230224,0.099773064,0.0007798561,0.00011439461,0.00014715703,0.00009926953,0.68131906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98101074,0.0009787524,0.0013913038,0.0023046397,0.00010967555,0.000038208877,0.000030456908,0.00004542699,0.014090924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98739225,0.0066802264,0.00025174726,0.0010673082,0.0030249758,0.0015834821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952247,0.0022920505,0.00029518476,0.0003432498,0.001241476,0.0006033766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00548118,0.00086213247,0.0007439091,0.002782818,0.03340712,0.025327044,0.003461109,0.0090259295,0.0023276848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010309385,0.0005047358,0.00051656715,0.004501887,0.07710594,0.010341823,0.007377832,0.010521751,0.00021309103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068869863,0.0000066882476,0.00018049497,0.000015019854,0.0000025772067,0.00020114786,0.117627315,0.000110604386,0.00009474715,0.87789077,0.0021213018,0.001742455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021213706,0.00004050767,0.0016714899,0.0004959401,0.000023517558,0.00023140316,0.27444568,0.0012679157,0.0004176888,0.46829084,0.25298885,0.000104937215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5747269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55145925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5747269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.078748845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033989917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8555553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2215707769","doi":"","title":"Multidimensional Analysis of Judicial Decision-Making: Reframing Judicial Activism as the Study of Judicial Discourse (Or Taking the Judgement Out of the Judgement)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Cognitive reframing; Judicial activism; Political science; Judicial opinion; Law; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.038732947981404364,"score_gpt":0.34642035618820505,"score_spread":0.3076874082068007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2215707769","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2824882,0.008787681,0.32840145,0.050779533,0.00065927976,0.00026933753,0.0004141001,0.00012086542,0.32807955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9713978,0.0006036957,0.026229031,0.00033962517,0.00014148452,0.00014212228,0.00005025703,0.000035329358,0.0010604793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97458684,0.019832525,0.000773828,0.0014394353,0.002283337,0.0010840788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96516234,0.025252149,0.0031377499,0.0032868476,0.0017742445,0.0013867043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01573971,0.00071414985,0.0011595213,0.0065506403,0.005481226,0.019915806,0.0023671575,0.002643846,0.0044218428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03161863,0.00053324056,0.0012711097,0.007465253,0.03912137,0.016039642,0.007908904,0.0051075616,0.00022588173],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018677609,0.000034437093,0.0006939657,0.00007845688,0.000024522567,0.000052550426,0.025424296,0.0006797136,0.00017353181,0.9651881,0.00055234745,0.007079429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000117456775,0.000014457394,0.0013234717,0.00010331953,0.000016510123,0.00003710391,0.018772863,0.0033419598,0.00014079412,0.96959734,0.006619091,0.000021315438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027153962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033070382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019915806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006417492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045344713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08324051},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2218718942","doi":"","title":"Review of Florian Sauvageau, David Taras, and David Schneiderman, The Last Word: Media Coverage of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.007575240028243129,"score_gpt":0.22955393235381902,"score_spread":0.22197869232557588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2218718942","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008347095,0.96093553,0.00003082955,0.026089774,0.0050176657,0.000009507835,0.000414585,0.000007953646,0.0074107368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0035271046,0.96384454,0.00008505653,0.016056944,0.0062154992,0.00002292418,0.00041087627,0.000018579036,0.009818437],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961455,0.0004413925,0.00018992602,0.0002211468,0.0027231462,0.00027894165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9734387,0.0043783933,0.0010099928,0.00026577085,0.020033147,0.0008739667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002526047,0.0009849871,0.0018426005,0.013962602,0.0031140356,0.005115772,0.001999082,0.0026350704,0.01250663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01730637,0.00056711753,0.00051591394,0.023462411,0.0026961456,0.002816009,0.0012007591,0.0030806328,0.0031579996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013326765,0.0000031682773,0.0001507498,0.0018108125,0.000026985503,0.00003316369,0.00014638355,0.000038902544,0.00003221814,0.0016486731,0.9649267,0.031168714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005470576,0.000004112936,0.0013552583,0.0054786825,0.000050370763,0.00005190502,0.00022323271,0.000011721761,0.000025665508,0.0004272998,0.9923538,0.000012464559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6938383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84454495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3061617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025244232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0633092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6159295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2219920467","doi":"","title":"A Work in Progress: The Supreme Court and the Charter's Equation of Rights and Limits","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Work (physics); Boundary (topology); Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04732905307249376,"score_gpt":0.2689039740693228,"score_spread":0.22157492099682907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2219920467","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03359584,0.031859543,0.053713344,0.38580477,0.0020972942,0.0000757749,0.00011322797,0.000077998615,0.49266222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9131405,0.009797089,0.023043336,0.013360845,0.0018828895,0.00015984304,0.00006112279,0.00008939989,0.038465034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9819863,0.012658863,0.00031837137,0.0012436622,0.002819493,0.0009733863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833097,0.01211715,0.0008606037,0.0014507924,0.0015634042,0.0006983473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018172072,0.00053431815,0.00083892775,0.0024281992,0.011616853,0.017857175,0.0023749594,0.010018624,0.0034980925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022683302,0.00050722784,0.0007213723,0.002871389,0.09394294,0.024396347,0.00582063,0.012078988,0.00042663142],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012677282,0.0000028410782,0.000016463164,0.0000027720746,4.7283612e-7,0.0000069710622,0.0005632286,0.00006794966,0.000005283385,0.99773395,0.00081677036,0.0007819161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063611874,0.0000067168116,0.0000731179,0.00005871039,0.0000018272826,0.000012764417,0.00085907284,0.0003265686,0.00004293906,0.9732878,0.025316974,0.0000071481677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03182111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028873121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96817887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017220926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023494888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12494719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2224804427","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1513","title":"Book Review: Boundaries of Judicial Review: The Law of Justiciability in Canada, by Lorne Sossin","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Law; Judicial review; Political science","score_opus":0.011113351055707644,"score_gpt":0.26355439568788336,"score_spread":0.2524410446321757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2224804427","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027672008,0.17243123,0.0009821549,0.6838273,0.011703669,0.00007810638,0.00035868268,0.000083174746,0.12776849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17585684,0.14915282,0.0022363893,0.3128776,0.027964577,0.0002613321,0.0003455519,0.0003726238,0.33093217],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917201,0.0018593144,0.00031990831,0.00075924,0.0043002493,0.0010412168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9545115,0.025380258,0.0010149587,0.0009434823,0.0151578635,0.0029919022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009117462,0.0005616567,0.0013699587,0.003611465,0.010876468,0.015298228,0.002536157,0.012058175,0.0072386074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058163557,0.0008571437,0.00032569128,0.006196492,0.019119421,0.0059193093,0.0015105114,0.010009704,0.0014113594],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000143297375,0.0000073658703,0.0003012248,0.00007143037,0.000009041437,0.000039848237,0.0006291591,0.00021429714,0.00003547923,0.093399495,0.8935221,0.011756145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027920818,0.000007418465,0.0023506228,0.0006933732,0.000026678385,0.000046409914,0.0010339998,0.00043980838,0.00008685874,0.059027918,0.9361911,0.000067947396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86883885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.953657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93485135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06514865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.124770485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47268873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W22278256","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1499","title":"The Dissenting Opinion: Voice of the Future?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"FPInnovations","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Unanimity; Dissent; Legitimacy; Law; Political science; Judicial opinion; Economic Justice; Independence (probability theory); Sociology","score_opus":0.01526052438481915,"score_gpt":0.28046479761573195,"score_spread":0.2652042732309128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W22278256","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010469435,0.017910605,0.001278112,0.7400777,0.007111245,0.000008113497,0.000043217195,0.000018975303,0.22308257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8071425,0.009671014,0.00061135634,0.11660586,0.0083145285,0.000017992423,0.00003168426,0.00005771721,0.05754727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913913,0.003372522,0.00015796702,0.0006149536,0.0027090763,0.0017540781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907795,0.0047060577,0.0005060044,0.0003540333,0.0025846392,0.0010698335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0106839705,0.00027377074,0.0003977394,0.0010002956,0.011462787,0.010301162,0.0013941148,0.007250909,0.0051802583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025654504,0.00015727946,0.0002319795,0.0009810537,0.018300703,0.009507884,0.0020936602,0.007325445,0.00085196126],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021503793,0.000010355999,0.00083858485,0.00005137964,0.000007781609,0.00050413003,0.03192069,0.00005789591,0.0001872412,0.7245713,0.2122057,0.029623525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012429134,0.000013107078,0.0015497751,0.00040666226,0.000010073745,0.00031306766,0.04635939,0.00017209891,0.0002472596,0.15256205,0.7983173,0.000036701458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09143538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14576234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09143538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013715011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012006066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18180633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2230338120","doi":"","title":"Judicial Review and the Charter from Multani to Doré (Contrôle judiciaire et la Charte de Multani à Doré)","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Political science; Humanities; European court of justice; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; European Union law; European union; Business","score_opus":0.008532201738574148,"score_gpt":0.273579888711667,"score_spread":0.26504768697309283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2230338120","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07362391,0.11025854,0.008897155,0.23725475,0.0074044955,0.00012826316,0.00015376233,0.00012005106,0.5621591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88093776,0.014347726,0.0040096943,0.032419104,0.0042435406,0.00010411965,0.00005451062,0.000038386675,0.0638451],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98791194,0.0051382952,0.00045221334,0.0015713312,0.0036601557,0.0012660746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914561,0.005292982,0.0010891719,0.00050640904,0.0012599695,0.00039548174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008696496,0.00023770508,0.00036377297,0.0013981821,0.0056383996,0.010234054,0.0007131963,0.004308506,0.0023652283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018060602,0.00025143693,0.00040487596,0.0010250171,0.012793897,0.003971366,0.0026113582,0.0048631835,0.00026049523],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010945523,0.000009869594,0.00027654384,0.000029590363,0.000003632251,0.00008848933,0.00087223056,0.00013213446,0.0000790304,0.96938556,0.016034432,0.0130775655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055518747,0.00009515841,0.0066000326,0.0004698997,0.000027095455,0.00030390287,0.0015040468,0.0010609418,0.0006379164,0.41046807,0.57868624,0.00009108074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026690654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042467877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97330934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009367198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010159953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06796408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2232287319","doi":"","title":"Executive Accountability and the APEC Inquiry: Comment on Ruling on Applications to Call Additional Government Witnesses","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Constitutionalism; Law; Accountability; Economic Justice; Political science; Government (linguistics); Commission; Constitutional law; State (computer science); Judicial review; Rule of law; Democracy; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01806762387391311,"score_gpt":0.29464252153701326,"score_spread":0.27657489766310017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2232287319","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010814722,0.0034659263,0.0003439631,0.8828896,0.0036854362,0.00006037095,0.00023258175,0.000048215483,0.098459214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10734879,0.0023972807,0.00032278692,0.8277907,0.0045506214,0.000094201496,0.00010205114,0.00007793121,0.057315618],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98347914,0.0021713786,0.000683121,0.0015408448,0.0060319696,0.006093468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96757406,0.0212635,0.0009496949,0.00083487,0.0069990396,0.002378734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012634968,0.0005942069,0.0011569621,0.0020906625,0.039965745,0.0135775,0.0061489837,0.0478677,0.007243632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05985111,0.0013030594,0.001005997,0.004184264,0.012777117,0.0041391146,0.0043990416,0.048921213,0.0012989431],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060227445,0.0000297277,0.002192211,0.00009170855,0.000024337362,0.0025700144,0.0116273165,0.00021561985,0.00021321919,0.17262985,0.80349666,0.0068490757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030895826,0.000018085733,0.0033475268,0.00029022433,0.000042987685,0.0003040307,0.010754273,0.00023596421,0.000314961,0.008586193,0.97598594,0.00008898859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82985866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8753007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82985866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048579298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.065863475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35246915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2232336412","doi":"10.1515/9780773583412-006","title":"Law – Eight Days a Week","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Economics","score_opus":0.039020771828446495,"score_gpt":0.24464169124704296,"score_spread":0.20562091941859648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2232336412","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011707059,0.0048149475,0.0016454505,0.081148796,0.048976254,0.0008752875,0.0037686403,0.0031513525,0.8439122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010523978,0.00031391115,0.0002637188,0.00788971,0.002475137,0.00016527859,0.00049496954,0.00022164376,0.97765154],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978058,0.0002736759,0.00008309529,0.0002793088,0.00089780154,0.000660305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954045,0.0003022363,0.00015019496,0.00057554286,0.00087892386,0.0026886107],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021067576,0.0008952637,0.0007973709,0.0012811841,0.008779536,0.009082316,0.0020500685,0.006317863,0.41011056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064119115,0.0006939198,0.00072081917,0.00067713513,0.0020565337,0.002623363,0.0050407723,0.005356516,0.205174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011453016,0.000108310844,0.00035888684,0.000035348174,0.000006782061,0.0001614164,0.0002934316,0.000027002206,0.00061609846,0.0041106693,0.968888,0.025279565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016050215,0.000033242133,0.0024593836,0.000026940563,0.0000012846472,0.000029033261,0.0004248566,0.000020454625,0.00008009555,0.0006506694,0.99625045,0.000007728295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020531073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10574397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41011056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029460827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00334851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8414057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2232994027","doi":"10.7202/1034054ar","title":"De la structure constitutionnelle dans le Renvoi relatif au Sénat : vers une gestalt constitutionnelle?","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.025203701991743193,"score_gpt":0.2691724840328691,"score_spread":0.2439687820411259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2232994027","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09245378,0.0028246574,0.054334942,0.0109115755,0.0002826146,0.0000659079,0.0001314858,0.00009399913,0.83890104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95090145,0.0010554709,0.005449873,0.00068251975,0.000079619844,0.00008008758,0.000068920286,0.00011572042,0.041566532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99665254,0.0015417166,0.0000937149,0.00063230784,0.0005767299,0.00050297927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998456,0.0006062728,0.00020804744,0.00030338118,0.00028384908,0.00014237265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027713743,0.0003985469,0.00053931255,0.0015540052,0.007016757,0.00979219,0.0011574742,0.0017749742,0.013148585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037632394,0.00039740247,0.0006375946,0.0019850782,0.036023073,0.009439669,0.0052849147,0.0041795657,0.0012316926],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000586434,0.000002373757,0.00025556472,0.0000144949045,0.0000036686413,0.00003648616,0.0076502054,0.0001398464,0.00011771969,0.9898106,0.00020775599,0.0017555018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019276627,0.00003941721,0.004851557,0.0003100318,0.000028883744,0.00019646059,0.024461778,0.0008476578,0.00088251726,0.79495984,0.17333572,0.00006686996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026205372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04250779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97379464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008454705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007088413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06134349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2233759581","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2830","title":"Comparative Matters: The Renaissance of Comparative Constitutional Law, by Ran Hirschl","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Ran; Constitutional law; Political science; The Renaissance; Comparative law; Law and economics; Sociology; Art; Computer science; Art history","score_opus":0.10081063947438781,"score_gpt":0.3446688745290058,"score_spread":0.24385823505461798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2233759581","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007830993,0.35243672,0.008748645,0.2433117,0.004759202,0.000041082163,0.00016782523,0.000053309373,0.3826505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7306333,0.11689693,0.010642138,0.038786832,0.010590771,0.00027436434,0.0002117844,0.00020037714,0.09176346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99651885,0.0024775746,0.00006381211,0.0003778731,0.00043294884,0.00012889368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99526006,0.003815894,0.00014446652,0.00032752042,0.00029903205,0.00015309943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005728774,0.0005012376,0.0004902691,0.0029505938,0.005487036,0.007428222,0.0010981676,0.0027924282,0.004465534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012072965,0.0003200843,0.000304514,0.0026917078,0.031926844,0.013775463,0.0027104858,0.0051348833,0.0003891159],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048569873,0.0000027095357,0.000038593083,0.000023356779,0.0000014926107,0.000016983477,0.0009461865,0.000049878618,0.000014126979,0.98425055,0.011361848,0.003289331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010026394,0.0000090756275,0.00038116195,0.0003572049,0.000003556508,0.000060310016,0.0014542645,0.00018372522,0.000046790476,0.686395,0.31109044,0.000008517758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015500467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016812827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015500467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011982418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057496005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08693886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2234089456","doi":"10.7202/1034049ar","title":"Constitutionalizing the Senate: A Modest Democratic Proposal","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Constitution; Political science; Democracy; Democratic legitimacy; Legitimacy; Law; House of Commons; Ideal (ethics); Order (exchange); Legislation; Separation of powers; Power (physics); Law and economics; Referendum; Sociology; Parliament; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.06944750153965605,"score_gpt":0.31411167005757473,"score_spread":0.24466416851791867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2234089456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037825584,0.007069436,0.046585564,0.37057585,0.0055057085,0.0003917118,0.00031076994,0.0002139753,0.5315213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83576405,0.0028324008,0.017340017,0.06791383,0.0034586075,0.00071052124,0.00010761726,0.00010126699,0.071771614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97892857,0.011195836,0.0007920013,0.0026452993,0.0038721666,0.0025661602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98953855,0.005199276,0.00032490116,0.0017862647,0.0023061023,0.0008448804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029853394,0.0006569633,0.00073935237,0.001855096,0.013829855,0.011992437,0.002085735,0.011337712,0.0045578135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030758671,0.0006125029,0.0011603611,0.0014816005,0.033373628,0.009379311,0.008824053,0.020053789,0.0010988393],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005597866,0.0000046996915,0.000045316367,0.000008238781,0.0000025247252,0.0000205566,0.00041821678,0.00011135814,0.000054835324,0.99674314,0.0016021318,0.0009832501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067567016,0.00004392692,0.00042677898,0.00014705295,0.000039795104,0.00007937399,0.00083430833,0.0010564035,0.0007089338,0.7734175,0.22311956,0.00005890131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042711716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053673357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98748547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012514531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028868567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15788168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2235405925","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1309","title":"The Shadow of Absurdity and the Challenge of Easy Cases: Looking Back on the Supreme Court Act Reference","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Skepticism; Political science; Majority opinion; Constitution; Concurring opinion; The Void; Legislature; Politics; Certiorari; Original jurisdiction; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.12828090069208994,"score_gpt":0.33760563110301806,"score_spread":0.2093247304109281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2235405925","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059827928,0.040030394,0.008817098,0.48430482,0.0044728243,0.000039696966,0.00003916368,0.000038033962,0.40242997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9101952,0.008012871,0.0018845788,0.06027789,0.0034416998,0.000042164305,0.00002064559,0.000103859835,0.016021159],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9782215,0.014767772,0.00042697438,0.0011741252,0.003910164,0.0014996075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95755523,0.036358282,0.0015775998,0.0012878843,0.0022048252,0.0010162676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01932337,0.00028646927,0.0006478918,0.0027101599,0.012225959,0.017096132,0.0017385472,0.009511208,0.0040856376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051571604,0.0003292409,0.00045705904,0.0015074715,0.07476084,0.018266365,0.008554181,0.017863648,0.00053565926],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000651338,0.000005745922,0.0001525634,0.00002653039,0.0000024198307,0.00012627174,0.009065327,0.000032546657,0.000049694077,0.98136306,0.005045855,0.00412353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014606402,0.000025672025,0.00084572344,0.00049360876,0.000008049991,0.0002156169,0.018779004,0.00016076816,0.00019521917,0.7945536,0.18467484,0.000033336833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010660137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013985349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01932337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007341898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005128493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10219294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2236198013","doi":"","title":"Judicial Review of Constitutional Transitions: War and Peace and Other Sundry Matters","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Presidential system; Law; Judicial review; Norm (philosophy); Politics; Discretion; Supreme court","score_opus":0.016879873345429428,"score_gpt":0.2868477078884803,"score_spread":0.26996783454305084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2236198013","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12089225,0.041160386,0.025556182,0.18268052,0.006939238,0.0009546631,0.0006070744,0.00025694765,0.6209527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89825946,0.010853365,0.0067893527,0.03895487,0.0038366136,0.00043975416,0.0002546664,0.00010472331,0.04050719],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9535477,0.020807412,0.0038960355,0.0048129125,0.0105347475,0.006401199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9030051,0.07342071,0.0044642556,0.004543395,0.01195086,0.0026157552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05636051,0.0003246246,0.000981464,0.0029441214,0.010542448,0.014131068,0.0033699886,0.0141090555,0.0037893506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.106425256,0.00068059977,0.0007763185,0.0033373812,0.015657967,0.006205357,0.004013923,0.011726904,0.00063418224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038617243,0.00006939241,0.0018499218,0.0002123369,0.000031123956,0.0012772832,0.00940583,0.00059464027,0.0005375947,0.90856236,0.048124436,0.029296475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013830095,0.0001516056,0.008162493,0.0013671806,0.00009983661,0.0005787373,0.01318619,0.0022819135,0.0019166563,0.23627084,0.7356733,0.0001729687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036983863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06452514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05636051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014321372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03315557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29806644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2237497123","doi":"10.7202/1034053ar","title":"Le fédéralisme comme principe matriciel dans l’interprétation de la procédure de modification constitutionnelle","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.07391410305977508,"score_gpt":0.3328778617831355,"score_spread":0.2589637587233604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2237497123","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02680037,0.008293466,0.049627434,0.06656995,0.0018129231,0.00013625644,0.0005553653,0.00019300931,0.8460114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7974965,0.0027684867,0.016225625,0.016182503,0.0006217302,0.00022374532,0.00017659784,0.00012910567,0.1661757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99173474,0.00286898,0.00030167509,0.0017897623,0.00200192,0.0013029673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980995,0.00068642694,0.0001418244,0.00033671304,0.00062375056,0.00011187204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004120717,0.0005051729,0.00044319293,0.0009401768,0.0067862608,0.006895712,0.0015623613,0.0043664724,0.008114609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056765657,0.00041875936,0.0008584809,0.0008777714,0.022857483,0.0032398906,0.0024163786,0.0073492066,0.0009885154],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063399684,0.000002389818,0.00010158549,0.000012878518,0.0000035712592,0.000015767671,0.00086876086,0.00009754755,0.00007301189,0.9948186,0.002391265,0.0016082949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003627205,0.00003924383,0.0024591773,0.00018976761,0.000040833445,0.00009561737,0.0015336834,0.00073384395,0.0012306867,0.50470406,0.48885858,0.00007833605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24625617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31874615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24625617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026487034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024477353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4896456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2237676564","doi":"10.29173/alr1429","title":"Common Law Cognition and Judicial Appointment","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legitimacy; Political science; Common law; Positivism; Legal profession; Politics","score_opus":0.026298492073448844,"score_gpt":0.3062235867004486,"score_spread":0.2799250946269997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2237676564","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35524055,0.0042970404,0.01916299,0.023354223,0.00033862868,0.000055219938,0.000066246044,0.000081850696,0.5974032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944858,0.00045186907,0.0010904323,0.00057668687,0.00007449589,0.000009822168,0.000021834265,0.000010905295,0.0032782492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912425,0.003949745,0.00024593712,0.0011561867,0.0021778776,0.0012277428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980995,0.011522646,0.0030659686,0.0012374644,0.0016925889,0.0014863558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007153507,0.00022221499,0.0004640336,0.003207876,0.0044314484,0.007098269,0.0014114308,0.0024229968,0.0071816975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03655535,0.00021213319,0.00040556816,0.0024690926,0.020822054,0.0056009567,0.0035513006,0.0027598839,0.00044839186],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002999159,0.00008535046,0.0053868634,0.00004914182,0.00001266344,0.0001262091,0.019610234,0.0004611387,0.00018833783,0.9492629,0.0017751711,0.02301198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054140524,0.000052729683,0.01742221,0.0001368774,0.000021952701,0.00014310604,0.01606153,0.00094406586,0.00022971736,0.929971,0.03492234,0.00004033421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024147376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025688015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024147376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006337444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060235905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048013687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2242163122","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1343578","title":"Britain's Political Constitution: A Normative Turn","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Normative; Politics; Political science; Turn (biochemistry); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Chemistry","score_opus":0.01180599697637806,"score_gpt":0.28999878903030607,"score_spread":0.278192792053928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2242163122","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.083649345,0.0024691739,0.003696522,0.19374566,0.0013980693,0.000029810435,0.00018647006,0.00008056743,0.7147444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9531621,0.0005537834,0.0007014322,0.008839197,0.0007436018,0.000052361524,0.0000836505,0.00012915998,0.035734866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868341,0.0049510067,0.0004243996,0.001125018,0.0039140503,0.0027513974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98998755,0.005345496,0.0004423441,0.0007844735,0.0024187036,0.0010214451],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010474298,0.00037922652,0.00084180327,0.0025658233,0.011079274,0.022978697,0.0022216262,0.0136100445,0.011680468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022671597,0.00080230035,0.00041600066,0.00274987,0.034360707,0.006641557,0.0049297493,0.012091445,0.0016097955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015286178,0.000009333922,0.0002031131,0.00001805782,0.000003905583,0.000030402807,0.0022435654,0.00009360107,0.000081637736,0.9898746,0.005473711,0.0019528038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000096150405,0.000030160834,0.0055229226,0.00020798873,0.000025644447,0.00008038817,0.0066384575,0.0006048971,0.0003571089,0.7959315,0.190449,0.000055794782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05809063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07430643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05809063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018182438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012832292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13192344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2243355986","doi":"","title":"Book Review – Courting the Right (The Charter Revolution & the Court Party by F.L. Morton & Rainer Knopff)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Politics; Scrutiny; Power (physics); Argument (complex analysis)","score_opus":0.0073709847871862005,"score_gpt":0.26054633268501415,"score_spread":0.253175347897828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2243355986","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000051576746,0.954943,0.00005362596,0.014492522,0.009173298,0.000010633347,0.00009214502,0.00001269249,0.021170534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011864165,0.93049544,0.00011787379,0.015430911,0.012631621,0.000028116818,0.00018627936,0.000028356995,0.039894946],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897456,0.00018449489,0.00006871031,0.00015829853,0.0005103909,0.00010358032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971763,0.0011398963,0.00026959804,0.00010553211,0.0010366406,0.00027203013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011395584,0.0007951898,0.0010272303,0.0029164376,0.001215094,0.0053078756,0.0015292882,0.0048466627,0.054699067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004084478,0.0005148913,0.0005095153,0.005416157,0.0020274315,0.0033430147,0.001439232,0.0042340434,0.030359393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006794251,0.000014094285,0.00004963597,0.0010195583,0.000006108383,0.00002245772,0.000048967995,0.000037094098,0.000023959048,0.004509773,0.9336162,0.060645368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031740653,0.0000059192444,0.0002732291,0.0018532038,0.000003403898,0.000055905977,0.000041627216,0.00000506665,0.00000869201,0.0007576518,0.9969875,0.000004647832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02638963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05198133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054699067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053235553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007947504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18298662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2243918626","doi":"","title":"Power without Law: The Supreme Court of Canada, the Marshall Decisions, and the Failure of Judicial Activism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Judicial activism; Legislature; Treaty; Power (physics); Judicial opinion; Order (exchange); Judicial review; Economics","score_opus":0.007444319181734406,"score_gpt":0.244346432582229,"score_spread":0.23690211340049458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2243918626","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03617958,0.016161965,0.0018290242,0.58453697,0.0015077173,0.00006388507,0.00011527883,0.000042278924,0.3595633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8203836,0.005399966,0.0009710497,0.10865585,0.0015158001,0.000094295436,0.000048116584,0.00008327274,0.06284807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98491156,0.0036871112,0.00026392407,0.0015606495,0.0042611742,0.0053155273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824536,0.010651562,0.00080925005,0.0005718911,0.0033674005,0.0021463002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013575636,0.0004625939,0.00065232586,0.0016707067,0.04051252,0.018968336,0.0037760213,0.017000126,0.004676368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034921914,0.0005437274,0.0005378415,0.0025793714,0.04701655,0.006038025,0.004283241,0.02130624,0.00040708773],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008279401,0.000007851476,0.00030510925,0.000013000456,0.000004885159,0.00012719283,0.0034869586,0.00010425395,0.000044043274,0.95801485,0.03483306,0.0030504772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000099965655,0.000028291772,0.0036949448,0.0006334356,0.000048006466,0.00011956361,0.012002339,0.0011512205,0.0006240874,0.47684315,0.5045859,0.00016906369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8978545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9301633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10214549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07896229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10303579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5729142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2243978188","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvddzh07.22","title":"Constitutional Change in Canada after Charlottetown","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Verlag Barbara Budrich eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Climatology; Geography; Geology","score_opus":0.03655145599869222,"score_gpt":0.24919989050691643,"score_spread":0.2126484345082242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2243978188","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047079492,0.058247734,0.0010931811,0.16681063,0.0043485253,0.0001565101,0.00096292264,0.00014111934,0.7211598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42460164,0.012629557,0.0007750922,0.032326255,0.00054745324,0.00010169499,0.00018709566,0.00017460035,0.52865654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907452,0.0008114654,0.00017460833,0.000854366,0.0028115246,0.004602904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99615014,0.001119476,0.00013925198,0.00017521165,0.0015824458,0.0008334685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003994575,0.0007912476,0.0012351996,0.0030675146,0.045276348,0.018650733,0.0027433035,0.010868392,0.020512138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011898793,0.0009664936,0.00070711825,0.0072013657,0.016872583,0.0036290986,0.0042101727,0.013115777,0.0010412362],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044484885,0.00002936474,0.00061022374,0.000087116365,0.000018834899,0.00034426583,0.006452624,0.00040165527,0.00014768356,0.8338659,0.1411259,0.016872028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029794115,0.000013115396,0.003625911,0.00027149968,0.00002928569,0.00007633493,0.005567899,0.00020327039,0.00028658804,0.026956145,0.9628453,0.00009479592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9949385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99770147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24607424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24607424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3064493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.874447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2244223146","doi":"10.7202/1034052ar","title":"The Senate Reference: Constitutional Change and Democracy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Parliament; Constitution; Separation of powers; Political science; Deliberation; Law; Status quo; Institution; Constitutional court; Judicial review; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.15372066724890415,"score_gpt":0.3311755309311911,"score_spread":0.17745486368228697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2244223146","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030170435,0.016694913,0.011290849,0.112370595,0.0011087384,0.00004607457,0.00008980258,0.000076362376,0.8281521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9365668,0.0043867542,0.0020021067,0.015321954,0.00087366946,0.00010873858,0.000049016806,0.00006544665,0.04062559],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9745427,0.018985063,0.00061687274,0.0017070055,0.002575786,0.0015724929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98964906,0.0067192167,0.0006849262,0.0011776043,0.0013206472,0.00044849192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015720338,0.000331098,0.0006104393,0.0017140108,0.01179919,0.012363465,0.0013516151,0.008151741,0.007747945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018106265,0.00033894856,0.0005527841,0.003023126,0.04730345,0.009566978,0.0061054276,0.008825472,0.0010604045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034247485,0.0000026348712,0.000064231026,0.000009088454,0.0000017126052,0.000031488056,0.0009833905,0.00006486185,0.00002797872,0.99577624,0.0015780412,0.0014570311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023965273,0.000024177547,0.0005792281,0.0001789796,0.000011445633,0.0000877197,0.0018011089,0.00025130788,0.00027255417,0.8459149,0.15083054,0.00002409057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015853178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01658494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015853178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009463516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009353973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08313811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2244952839","doi":"","title":"IDENTITY'S IMPORTANCE: REFLECTIONS OF - AND ON - DIVERSITY","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Diversity (politics); Variety (cybernetics); Jurisprudence; Identity (music); Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.02873111187568932,"score_gpt":0.32686611651617864,"score_spread":0.2981350046404893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2244952839","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50358886,0.0030511944,0.004282072,0.094786026,0.00124332,0.000042142514,0.00005528288,0.000028103344,0.392923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939746,0.00033849236,0.00018583244,0.0011399337,0.000088090565,0.0000074136588,0.00001132537,0.000019675317,0.0042346767],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9824311,0.011966742,0.00022980425,0.0007955562,0.002099951,0.0024767788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907912,0.0052620093,0.00052466406,0.0006640105,0.0011436373,0.0016144722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012389763,0.00052682497,0.00057381263,0.0019652543,0.038160436,0.02151678,0.002453665,0.004290886,0.0027505986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020089587,0.00037302458,0.00045956057,0.0017178106,0.08243823,0.014651576,0.021054884,0.012204182,0.00021974796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014119619,0.0000121991925,0.000607617,0.000014310164,0.0000031390114,0.00023392694,0.85795933,0.00002048535,0.00010588068,0.13675375,0.0014100235,0.0028652241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071961554,0.000013593728,0.0007447946,0.00007387777,0.000005986939,0.0001918145,0.89942485,0.00006368977,0.00016977332,0.030970512,0.06832061,0.000013302038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056041576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06336401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056041576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016988646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011982265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12326187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2247161180","doi":"","title":"Chief Justice Lamer and Some Myths About Judicial Activism","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Mythology; Economic Justice; Political science; Parliament; Law; Judicial activism; Legislature; Ignorance; Judicial review; Politics; History","score_opus":0.009802861528799391,"score_gpt":0.27278174402734917,"score_spread":0.2629788824985498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2247161180","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02150287,0.018818399,0.0016127474,0.85126364,0.0013169735,0.000014789891,0.000016430447,0.000021778184,0.10543232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7852939,0.007417925,0.0012941732,0.18218817,0.0070320307,0.0000756326,0.000014765788,0.000033904216,0.016649567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874462,0.007150907,0.00027213863,0.0014599429,0.0018668894,0.0018039008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98216885,0.013985269,0.0012008236,0.0005583027,0.0012856764,0.00080104306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013784075,0.00028787984,0.00042224114,0.0016457934,0.011807127,0.008671394,0.0018839317,0.012444461,0.0024709688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018552225,0.00028162485,0.00046899996,0.0010747259,0.048505556,0.006757735,0.0035166647,0.013311782,0.00040378456],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001920885,0.000036090656,0.0003575051,0.00005849193,0.000006377479,0.00017817583,0.013311871,0.000117955526,0.00010764819,0.9429266,0.034992795,0.007887301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005324324,0.0000666925,0.0011169988,0.0003746607,0.0000099620365,0.00027602597,0.012362408,0.00034174914,0.00053439726,0.6277526,0.35707682,0.000034376648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035748666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031913253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013784075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067199296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037767857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07289803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2248683898","doi":"","title":"Chapter 13: Taking Competence Seriously","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Charter; Political science; Social rights; Law and economics; Judicial review; Law; Public administration; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.017863995522248526,"score_gpt":0.2891797098480398,"score_spread":0.27131571432579127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2248683898","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012174235,0.004119856,0.004729861,0.050906032,0.0009802509,0.000121875186,0.000096722666,0.00006088337,0.9377671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23570718,0.012170718,0.013130473,0.09037897,0.0024735997,0.0007672715,0.00029637993,0.00035646203,0.64471895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852748,0.0036914868,0.0005851781,0.0020661196,0.0054979185,0.0028844818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919944,0.0027826487,0.00023340885,0.0008320937,0.0031852727,0.0009721015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011881056,0.0009794752,0.00069583894,0.0013835758,0.016392065,0.021885043,0.0032723616,0.013804366,0.021476118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013416813,0.00068292645,0.000862498,0.0012077861,0.038842298,0.013237252,0.010662657,0.013361099,0.005528966],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003967923,0.000007100298,0.000100425415,0.00004446201,0.000001578555,0.000063301704,0.0042495374,0.000049217728,0.000055274002,0.94683117,0.041227695,0.00736614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009336412,0.000010660372,0.0004118378,0.00062997,0.000007858532,0.00013325803,0.0036101758,0.00008582715,0.00019860142,0.15529187,0.83958685,0.000023645678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28957096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3037375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28957096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02624186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0685203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.575771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253166203","doi":"","title":"Canadian Proportionality Analysis: 5 1/2 Myths","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Charter; Cognitive reframing; Jurisprudence; Mythology; Political science; Law; Democracy; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Politics; History","score_opus":0.01131291938189996,"score_gpt":0.2737128434505579,"score_spread":0.262399924068658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253166203","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013118301,0.006910097,0.011985184,0.34777877,0.0020346513,0.00007355934,0.00041951865,0.00014014388,0.61753976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81165147,0.009554414,0.017118657,0.077295,0.0019022417,0.0002362226,0.00033173294,0.0003137288,0.08159648],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9775803,0.0036905857,0.00061974983,0.0027602725,0.012252654,0.0030963772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9826193,0.005510633,0.000533312,0.0011469678,0.009021476,0.0011683494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01830814,0.000769249,0.00091023254,0.0049396777,0.025283322,0.015160721,0.00522455,0.005659793,0.008928443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034849375,0.00059637654,0.0010096797,0.0051415227,0.054360513,0.009467997,0.005370907,0.012935136,0.0006958472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045103825,0.000003720315,0.00010468023,0.000018803872,0.000002506719,0.00001671882,0.0021013077,0.00008361705,0.000016973812,0.9806388,0.012831551,0.004176744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001904296,0.000009384495,0.0011312598,0.00037881854,0.0000235053,0.00008985291,0.005846871,0.0009823884,0.00026902673,0.63163626,0.35952824,0.000085418644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92681664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8772042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1146141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1146141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.120883316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8315874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253485966","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781316106327","title":"Human Dignity","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":156,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Autonomy; Value (mathematics); Law; Democracy; Political science; Constitutional court; Constitutional law; Scope (computer science); Human rights; Expression (computer science); German; Philosophy; Politics; Constitution; Computer science","score_opus":0.05664718749141537,"score_gpt":0.26194559666526895,"score_spread":0.20529840917385359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253485966","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031590853,0.012335248,0.003467033,0.008038531,0.00067823654,0.00006521811,0.00012296201,0.000047198566,0.97208655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33852142,0.028945912,0.007900242,0.013723593,0.0016179121,0.00038423267,0.0005162075,0.00015521614,0.60823536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974611,0.00053652,0.00012918904,0.0003882924,0.0011386294,0.00034628724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881303,0.0004300546,0.00011270381,0.00022953609,0.0002567992,0.00015781412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002078176,0.0004774882,0.0005092737,0.0012205144,0.0035344535,0.006627823,0.0010968999,0.0030545418,0.019138478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046591507,0.00018891144,0.0003672188,0.001047932,0.014474049,0.004859677,0.005052612,0.0032400463,0.0052349316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048508045,0.000011520247,0.00015090525,0.00009130304,0.0000036126585,0.000083456456,0.002629584,0.00008664231,0.0002219649,0.94761777,0.014292704,0.034805704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004660967,0.000022804657,0.00047471613,0.0005576684,0.000005422235,0.00031880665,0.0010511278,0.00004956908,0.00023843313,0.21294942,0.784316,0.000011350679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037769955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004042746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019138478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037033362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005616624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06402463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253647920","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1510","title":"Law's Expression: The Promise and Perils of Judicial Opinion Writing in Canadian Constitutional Law","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Minimalism (technical communication); Law; Expression (computer science); Function (biology); Democracy; Public opinion; Judicial opinion; Constitutional law; Political science; Judicial review; Sociology; Politics; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.02464647210379686,"score_gpt":0.28659102424150984,"score_spread":0.261944552137713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253647920","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12820184,0.003819978,0.005816533,0.16392478,0.00081153127,0.00004685314,0.000113736416,0.00009221757,0.69717246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806732,0.00077700056,0.0011224498,0.002925636,0.0001556006,0.000016561518,0.000017526014,0.000030505105,0.014281471],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889501,0.0033101735,0.00025013022,0.000681501,0.0045807557,0.0022272721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875559,0.0056854114,0.00066294085,0.000651014,0.0044198753,0.0010248293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01034858,0.00025777088,0.00028443197,0.0017200526,0.025004378,0.018635897,0.00218404,0.0035249104,0.0044580237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041178666,0.00039283696,0.00025192165,0.0027036553,0.031695522,0.0053200214,0.004548881,0.0057221185,0.00031303873],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022252923,0.000008497392,0.000970181,0.00002759782,0.0000031327036,0.0001240714,0.05508779,0.00017965808,0.0002512778,0.9079026,0.010311378,0.025111483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005588216,0.00004610342,0.011692268,0.00046889798,0.000058105707,0.00020183001,0.09738002,0.0031652942,0.0013884862,0.39528397,0.49008703,0.0001720394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9073878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9349579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09261221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08644544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10266871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62720853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253865097","doi":"","title":"The Case for Tribunal Standing in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Law; Political science; Judicial review","score_opus":0.0328976387030361,"score_gpt":0.26286598089022156,"score_spread":0.22996834218718545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253865097","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.120825894,0.009744193,0.0026350291,0.40995076,0.0019840284,0.00021125544,0.0005250618,0.00011626393,0.45400754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8432208,0.0027503776,0.0025077506,0.063686185,0.00047884564,0.00008410474,0.00017847269,0.00009693384,0.08699666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9777874,0.0018822544,0.00051756646,0.0018521328,0.008898083,0.00906266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97431326,0.0049259565,0.00091717415,0.0010864817,0.010577143,0.008179902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009062108,0.00029198575,0.0007207034,0.0020592276,0.035797782,0.015521584,0.003147909,0.010642731,0.010839482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035168234,0.0007202012,0.00083363854,0.0033908114,0.0125806,0.002906547,0.0062811603,0.010868787,0.0006475562],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103736056,0.00004734198,0.010587165,0.00020983338,0.000067231864,0.00153457,0.012041815,0.00068142905,0.0008062789,0.77933544,0.14469232,0.049892783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015708094,0.00006793809,0.045913015,0.0009681293,0.00018701756,0.0006502763,0.016776184,0.0022757866,0.0009107367,0.09178655,0.8399852,0.0003220251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98956865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99575543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12520061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12520061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30246833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9083983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W225416150","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511511035.022","title":"Democratic Decision Making as the First Principle of Contemporary Constitutionalism","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Society of Canada; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Law; Democracy; Political science; Politics; Sovereignty; Law and economics; Popular sovereignty; State (computer science); Constitutional theory; Separation of powers; Constitutional law; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03674468500323188,"score_gpt":0.2565373470676617,"score_spread":0.2197926620644298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W225416150","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005776302,0.013723846,0.09214748,0.046848502,0.0012368788,0.00013071952,0.00013703521,0.00012306459,0.83987623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7997821,0.014375133,0.053022508,0.013459997,0.0035523227,0.00086184486,0.00021629789,0.00023556293,0.114494294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898868,0.0042655068,0.00039228812,0.001632799,0.0028904309,0.0009322686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995337,0.0028243344,0.0002640278,0.00091475365,0.00045336955,0.0002065293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010575432,0.00062151457,0.00084844406,0.0013346176,0.0056047854,0.013226618,0.0016956442,0.0042237025,0.0049589593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010048958,0.0005102725,0.00081296713,0.0015368625,0.04255206,0.009228796,0.0041460292,0.010031412,0.0012187939],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.4398364e-7,0.0000016338277,0.0000074481786,0.0000072252765,7.266949e-7,0.00000234927,0.00014409254,0.0000997509,0.000008741643,0.99819535,0.0006082837,0.00092379126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041341955,0.0000025065815,0.000015516864,0.00002568708,0.0000011985329,0.000006086153,0.000041149473,0.00013919185,0.000035971152,0.9727183,0.027007584,0.0000026658743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037459885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033760974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013226618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009597756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00872818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254860617","doi":"","title":"Northern Ireland, the Belfast Agreement, and the British Constitution","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Ideology; Constitution; Legitimacy; Law; Northern ireland; Politics; Irish; Political science; Sociology; Ethnology; Democracy; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0076657608377248285,"score_gpt":0.2350175225863369,"score_spread":0.22735176174861207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254860617","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02080852,0.014892482,0.0018546307,0.042006824,0.0019018358,0.00004053935,0.00019958317,0.000073217525,0.91822237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62739307,0.006254678,0.003293767,0.020804962,0.00045163892,0.00022695216,0.00037901063,0.00011874698,0.34107718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99130464,0.0033161328,0.0003030838,0.001017557,0.0020091957,0.0020494214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969894,0.0011270782,0.0002462358,0.00033981123,0.0007892703,0.00050812494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004543717,0.0002816976,0.000475941,0.0013096213,0.0071777995,0.009171243,0.001487183,0.0031067552,0.012168932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0081038615,0.00032105923,0.0003578306,0.0024241013,0.014133532,0.004423058,0.0045898166,0.0048051234,0.0019044889],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006109319,0.000014786595,0.0006788151,0.00012578427,0.0000075820876,0.000230717,0.004941986,0.00026213142,0.00008701927,0.9290138,0.04187651,0.022699803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002413255,0.00001864392,0.003826128,0.00029871837,0.000010560914,0.00016481211,0.004133748,0.00012610591,0.00009958965,0.058371514,0.93288106,0.00004511117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43587753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.56426847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43587753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027523544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020366224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86668086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254983969","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1445","title":"Of Pigeonholes and Principles: A Reconsideration of Discrimination Law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Common law; Law; Statutory law; Legislature; Action (physics); Prejudice (legal term); Quality (philosophy); Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.076643368074212,"score_gpt":0.28735525985051685,"score_spread":0.21071189177630484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254983969","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035083983,0.012489717,0.18674377,0.5076547,0.005905651,0.00018416629,0.00012831326,0.0002640421,0.2515456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83871764,0.0037072767,0.06118579,0.07012862,0.0036696072,0.00046804178,0.0000547646,0.00032606846,0.0217423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96653306,0.017200192,0.0011475252,0.004543665,0.007952658,0.0026229012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9735867,0.017419169,0.0010977098,0.003966838,0.0028910846,0.0010384785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032092255,0.0008341534,0.0015154681,0.002895199,0.010454903,0.013467674,0.004640476,0.015451159,0.002553617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037818976,0.0009994693,0.0021567538,0.0014168627,0.1137634,0.02952617,0.009868933,0.030338002,0.00056784553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033293759,0.000004922639,0.00004679877,0.000008508599,0.0000017608274,0.000027496628,0.0010863782,0.000095039264,0.000029197161,0.9962559,0.0009422015,0.0014984551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011769216,0.000016464608,0.000066059474,0.000050099636,0.0000037853251,0.00004862315,0.0005348333,0.00039602755,0.000062038904,0.9746242,0.024172612,0.0000133763415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01476833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010024595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032092255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011114658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012991837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16972214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255030594","doi":"","title":"How Supreme is the Supreme Law of the Land? A Comparative Analysis of the Influence of International Human Rights Conventions Upon the Interpretation of Constitutional Texts by Domestic Courts","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Human rights; Political science; Comparative law; Municipal law; International human rights law; Constitutional law; Public law; Common law; Treaty; Fundamental rights","score_opus":0.010169375326137079,"score_gpt":0.28631857072145916,"score_spread":0.27614919539532207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255030594","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2022764,0.023482233,0.0076957503,0.046707064,0.0004750746,0.000019898836,0.00007173552,0.000020293552,0.7192516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930419,0.0019465919,0.00044730728,0.0009807665,0.00011990186,0.000008390891,0.000019364286,0.000014601536,0.003421183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99419034,0.0035249942,0.00012468321,0.00058319094,0.00085008197,0.0007266811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99402034,0.004527148,0.00033553602,0.0004453296,0.0004755388,0.00019612031],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060138167,0.00013966324,0.00038418255,0.0016079695,0.0056302273,0.010245928,0.00092007336,0.0022761512,0.004029009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014124751,0.00015260614,0.0002675805,0.0023514894,0.042470485,0.0088019725,0.0023289477,0.0032350097,0.00032694812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056348795,0.0000036759184,0.00026919437,0.000010785481,0.0000037981606,0.000035697693,0.0030713994,0.0000687171,0.00008004445,0.99108094,0.0006891849,0.0046809604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000132042205,0.000051108607,0.0054963497,0.0004134146,0.000030097366,0.00013244193,0.015887672,0.0003827108,0.0005400604,0.8213719,0.15565126,0.000029824469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008416431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014755194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010245928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066091414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003051848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04795289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255984055","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3437","title":"The lure and the limits of dialogue","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Charter; Legislature; Political science; Law; Human rights; Sociology; Law and economics; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028836825296061897,"score_gpt":0.24361622916133863,"score_spread":0.21477940386527672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255984055","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07590609,0.03466207,0.024886739,0.2593297,0.001162871,0.000068819216,0.000111049994,0.00018484844,0.6036879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824671,0.0027445327,0.0019443785,0.005297399,0.0005153611,0.000091593975,0.000019829491,0.0001011673,0.0068186806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93231505,0.055167813,0.0010954795,0.0033852134,0.0054221037,0.0026143715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95655113,0.033844925,0.0019062797,0.003765779,0.0022321262,0.0016997689],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029197507,0.000568854,0.0011462021,0.00317015,0.021910304,0.024377985,0.002221791,0.007965118,0.004982402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046691753,0.0008354329,0.00051547715,0.0024914106,0.17205717,0.032418124,0.018434439,0.012419024,0.00083633536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009147229,0.000002923711,0.00008160032,0.000029086224,0.000002100154,0.000039532788,0.041368987,0.00005074934,0.00004247061,0.95532656,0.00095793104,0.0020888615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026873118,0.000016420881,0.00022900518,0.00028557537,0.0000071912386,0.00016952973,0.036795888,0.0002779602,0.00013018936,0.8415221,0.12051473,0.0000245617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014032533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007889293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029197507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019001551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009321344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15441298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256235904","doi":"10.1017/s0020589315000275","title":"FOREIGN FADS OR FASHIONS? THE ROLE OF COMPARATIVISM IN HUMAN RIGHTS LAW","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Dignity; Political science; Comparative law; Law; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; International human rights law; Common law; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.09201827566361949,"score_gpt":0.3557104540449946,"score_spread":0.2636921783813751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256235904","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1506112,0.0075416267,0.037400715,0.09066108,0.000675212,0.000071295144,0.000069620815,0.000092508504,0.7128768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930956,0.00043625123,0.0016897875,0.0016613138,0.00013042943,0.000029888794,0.000010387436,0.000019029045,0.0029273734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.969022,0.024850596,0.00047112608,0.002111908,0.0017951387,0.0017493811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9686771,0.024042588,0.0017251094,0.0032307915,0.0014251249,0.0008993394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034398295,0.00030133573,0.00080346706,0.0026009046,0.00758222,0.015863955,0.0020160165,0.0046926048,0.0070641395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033438075,0.00035360391,0.00068414264,0.0019860258,0.07768215,0.025032235,0.010124843,0.004901336,0.0003764132],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058566516,0.0000036490117,0.000099575554,0.0000087347025,0.0000020500222,0.000016194266,0.0021832094,0.000042744938,0.000012274365,0.99615186,0.00024031133,0.0012335328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012794963,0.000019667377,0.00027479627,0.000098285695,0.000007342332,0.000037717542,0.005695538,0.000268636,0.00010504529,0.97607386,0.017397808,0.00000851922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003614088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002669726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034398295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007872386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003955441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18191779},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256301177","doi":"","title":"Royal Assent – The Business of Parliament or the Executive?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Law; Political science; Government (linguistics); Queen (butterfly); Convention; Advice (programming); Politics","score_opus":0.03457432276344833,"score_gpt":0.29769657075063055,"score_spread":0.2631222479871822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256301177","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023307353,0.0138366865,0.0027388318,0.19789377,0.0016906062,0.0000135826585,0.000030523355,0.000035649256,0.76045305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82295513,0.0040613,0.0006385487,0.020996701,0.00096380553,0.000016099273,0.00002344585,0.00004645662,0.1502985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885688,0.0063018096,0.0003020969,0.000992513,0.0019040444,0.0019307816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943634,0.00263493,0.00068472326,0.00070065213,0.0008832489,0.000733116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008934644,0.00022278161,0.00031346997,0.0005645353,0.0063463086,0.009874254,0.0010957302,0.0047469204,0.008020138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017426131,0.00022943692,0.00018744446,0.0009482883,0.022183556,0.00685418,0.002205519,0.0045174845,0.0026007586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005858526,0.0000036654797,0.0001240873,0.000013748322,0.000001251205,0.0000301703,0.0030042776,0.000012218953,0.000055854405,0.98438823,0.008358127,0.0040026293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000098364835,0.000032908163,0.0011979776,0.0003020792,0.0000053216186,0.00017140013,0.009267314,0.00009232747,0.0002776387,0.14060014,0.8480199,0.000023279146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015188014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016516237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015188014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038133236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006043574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047251523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256453488","doi":"","title":"Private Law as Constitutional Context for Same-Sex Marriage","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional law; Family law; Law; Private law; Public law; Comparative law; Constitutionalism; Charter; Political science; Context (archaeology); Common law; Marriage law; Reciprocal; Sociology; Politics; Democracy; Geography","score_opus":0.02377560016572354,"score_gpt":0.28656621994722653,"score_spread":0.262790619781503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256453488","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19947383,0.0047731623,0.0109882075,0.0473134,0.00025241417,0.000092372946,0.00037404857,0.000076465374,0.7366561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98678756,0.00056410476,0.00061692303,0.0012702966,0.00007080413,0.000016965836,0.000053698197,0.000020081707,0.010599514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924353,0.001934269,0.00017105014,0.00097344106,0.0017861166,0.0026998597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951083,0.0022498872,0.00032584055,0.0006962176,0.0009387753,0.00068085256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004865595,0.00023846507,0.000538628,0.0022924915,0.021051822,0.012274916,0.0019114391,0.004275138,0.007491022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011985727,0.00043877988,0.00042102428,0.0020312355,0.05636966,0.006444535,0.0052604005,0.005520839,0.00029192393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024332237,0.0000040290533,0.00018810118,0.000004163376,0.0000011332755,0.000046528035,0.003637311,0.000070081915,0.000043528762,0.99456257,0.00042775166,0.0010124544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037161208,0.00002874867,0.0063149207,0.00014773372,0.000028235458,0.00016191554,0.01577966,0.0010379695,0.0006044894,0.81510884,0.16070342,0.000046893896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.716026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.73062146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.716026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057316743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054936413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57129276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256778224","doi":"","title":"A Final Letter","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Duty; Invocation; Law and economics; Political science; Economic Justice; Politics; Law; Process (computing); Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.015217968239784482,"score_gpt":0.27781354417748166,"score_spread":0.26259557593769717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256778224","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001231462,0.0029918049,0.0009846427,0.53451127,0.20737077,0.00023518571,0.0012337454,0.00038556365,0.25105557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007589167,0.0007629264,0.00042896115,0.39078313,0.017442638,0.00016079556,0.0003328127,0.00013430898,0.5823653],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99655825,0.00060076365,0.00023329048,0.00068134925,0.0012870703,0.0006392812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930559,0.0019250547,0.00017178242,0.00051432283,0.0036229172,0.0007099933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031270192,0.00053677394,0.00072241115,0.0008480032,0.0062747677,0.006657922,0.0017512251,0.016654097,0.14269131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02139752,0.0005004527,0.001261318,0.00055480027,0.0015400499,0.003804295,0.0024377052,0.013934337,0.08295707],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018712275,0.0000104220735,0.00007506019,0.000025595193,0.000002290271,0.00008761327,0.000052540017,0.000012038871,0.00007633374,0.008615179,0.98764384,0.0033803803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008942219,0.000010608884,0.00027308223,0.00005379416,0.0000033144606,0.000053899275,0.00014340143,0.00003578201,0.00011365081,0.002476087,0.9968184,0.00000893505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008783114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015662208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14269131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00409823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058189915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256842593","doi":"10.21991/c9mm3w","title":"GOVERNING THE CANADIAN STATE: THE CONSTITUTION IN AN ERA OF GLOBALIZATION, NEO-LIBERALISM, POPULISM, DECENTRALIZATION AND JUDICIAL ACTIVISM","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Peasant; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Charter; Limited government; Liberalism; Politics","score_opus":0.03275263109901524,"score_gpt":0.2720643479479774,"score_spread":0.23931171684896216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256842593","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04438645,0.04004724,0.0016476852,0.30502123,0.0014716692,0.000054388005,0.00030579587,0.000075738746,0.60698986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85747415,0.01650246,0.0015686481,0.017932951,0.00041133087,0.00003536062,0.00010893114,0.000063035666,0.105903104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99719703,0.0004809799,0.000037638678,0.00026486677,0.0009259229,0.0010935476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845636,0.00042292033,0.00008025813,0.00008209349,0.0006056001,0.00035274465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023508642,0.0004141629,0.00029189195,0.00185689,0.028922195,0.01036642,0.0013443802,0.0042483676,0.005452079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041980897,0.00024974038,0.00023731559,0.0036068098,0.028389474,0.003891424,0.0020600725,0.0051363595,0.00030975766],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010344585,0.00000947449,0.0004733953,0.00003397984,0.0000032814485,0.00009816774,0.0084053725,0.00021567315,0.00009873935,0.94234574,0.040670987,0.007634893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017516672,0.000013606059,0.007960481,0.00031454672,0.000015041,0.00009174264,0.025609406,0.0005741697,0.00022843902,0.100097016,0.8649814,0.000096535754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9919629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99649626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1530066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1530066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16556156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9823923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257517042","doi":"10.21991/c91h26","title":"APPOINTMENTS TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Remand (court procedure); Original jurisdiction; Majority opinion; Certiorari","score_opus":0.035827875122077656,"score_gpt":0.25622851208617875,"score_spread":0.2204006369641011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257517042","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08025928,0.0046335477,0.0007526939,0.16146071,0.00914248,0.0005291047,0.0037422855,0.00029208293,0.7391877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37728456,0.0024760885,0.0009832251,0.035576917,0.0013011127,0.00012083252,0.0010628663,0.0001488728,0.58104557],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9847349,0.0007287148,0.0002876218,0.0010404651,0.004370044,0.008838216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98096,0.0016707731,0.00036459212,0.00032946537,0.008728,0.007947147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033248207,0.00043549706,0.0009525279,0.0042735515,0.049620137,0.009717544,0.0029114557,0.00964445,0.04127616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017697273,0.00088722695,0.0008218282,0.0039965217,0.0026192986,0.0014812605,0.002835307,0.011060065,0.0027640972],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012535814,0.00009444804,0.009072168,0.000095400384,0.000050363065,0.0016135414,0.004480448,0.0005089748,0.0008474456,0.12593588,0.8316814,0.025494574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005709187,0.000023338042,0.026034577,0.00016683585,0.0000463993,0.00012958812,0.0058904197,0.00059432175,0.0005310377,0.003889296,0.9625086,0.00012848784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98971456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99735236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14843497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14843497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27546012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98769474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257874793","doi":"","title":"Law's Ambition and the Reconstruction of Role Morality in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.00656176574190685,"score_gpt":0.22552995903192388,"score_spread":0.21896819329001704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257874793","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40215018,0.0014140832,0.0019558347,0.057086803,0.00023583825,0.00008387639,0.0003782291,0.000046868434,0.5366483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9750803,0.00018797188,0.00023878977,0.001396572,0.000013166946,0.000009570719,0.000026392912,0.000020955513,0.023026386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.992257,0.0010720309,0.000120698634,0.0006900316,0.0016133758,0.0042469227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99234855,0.0015737149,0.00032346768,0.00028988597,0.0033610803,0.0021033545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004730295,0.00020903432,0.0006381378,0.0019510875,0.039447397,0.014978494,0.002623883,0.0044991635,0.012604738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016241431,0.00040304178,0.00043934176,0.0035532368,0.022534965,0.0029108522,0.0043097967,0.007880657,0.00043126338],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006576623,0.000028896015,0.0058391816,0.000025669488,0.000012779909,0.00015020168,0.025111316,0.00061202125,0.000152886,0.9465374,0.011049437,0.010414487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016432705,0.00007626286,0.06817221,0.00035380613,0.00010760266,0.00017059986,0.14498852,0.004183165,0.0009900053,0.31456792,0.46596694,0.0002586068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9944089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.190394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.190394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2940623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9390282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258241783","doi":"","title":"Enforcing Laws That Infringe Rights","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Legislation; Human rights; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Enforcement; Judicial review; Legislature; Reservation of rights; Right to property","score_opus":0.03632216239761038,"score_gpt":0.2928380810203902,"score_spread":0.25651591862277984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258241783","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09818051,0.0035491448,0.015872434,0.04525451,0.0006338141,0.0002404719,0.000094308554,0.00014183756,0.836033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9412483,0.001828043,0.0059968987,0.015251521,0.0003013212,0.00012080288,0.0000424079,0.00004971869,0.035161074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94338155,0.019453105,0.0040781447,0.0037235937,0.02144811,0.007915483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9178643,0.05447979,0.0069424473,0.009251994,0.0099047115,0.0015567564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035989527,0.000412135,0.00061582215,0.0023984918,0.008780246,0.009794206,0.002097526,0.007943911,0.0051916433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07438159,0.0005978451,0.00054458715,0.0017208642,0.040298294,0.00523952,0.0071138367,0.0067789177,0.0011814884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005009268,0.000016716423,0.00097554136,0.000041115207,0.000007869315,0.00010473555,0.0065928753,0.00010292225,0.0006842465,0.9814152,0.0029254046,0.007128411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007545728,0.00025045555,0.010982966,0.0008528341,0.00014336822,0.00047223657,0.016243378,0.0010332238,0.0064098607,0.44328597,0.52011317,0.00013713233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07913633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.112372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07913633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007302228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023569904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19033307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258359097","doi":"","title":"A Comment on Canadian Constitutionalism","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Democracy; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Multiculturalism; Human rights; Law; Constitutionalism; Glory; Normative; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015595924504402588,"score_gpt":0.27550848197179467,"score_spread":0.25991255746739206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258359097","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002446302,0.008147431,0.0003767637,0.8361345,0.008357051,0.00003893224,0.00053346663,0.00006891733,0.14389664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04926013,0.00435265,0.0007161573,0.8552184,0.004470504,0.00007928749,0.00025520637,0.00012210709,0.0855255],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9857275,0.0012653471,0.00039025067,0.0018742647,0.0063887616,0.004353891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9862829,0.0055381563,0.0003650477,0.0005984712,0.0058947406,0.0013207383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009281841,0.00083521643,0.0012100766,0.0031026143,0.036592573,0.015661744,0.006155824,0.029882124,0.017567417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029251456,0.00081357936,0.0018263132,0.0069715492,0.019699546,0.005794874,0.0046719783,0.027603475,0.0020675343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026450161,0.000008240733,0.00033901184,0.00007365697,0.000008008228,0.00018436974,0.0020917526,0.00010407139,0.0000851164,0.38407126,0.6083077,0.0047003324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024315437,0.000005533556,0.0011393179,0.0001766687,0.000015186811,0.00007112253,0.0016026243,0.00010893952,0.000084781284,0.015013167,0.98170173,0.00005675208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96781766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9696205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11479479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11479479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13030942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8328984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258518658","doi":"","title":"Developments in Constitutional Law: The 2004-2005 Term - A Court In Transition","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; Constitutional court; Victory; Preliminary ruling; Political science; High Court; Privilege (computing); Term (time); Section (typography); Compensation (psychology); Politics; Constitution; Business; Economic Justice; Psychology","score_opus":0.01205911939712264,"score_gpt":0.2704237513526435,"score_spread":0.2583646319555209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258518658","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5438506,0.008867496,0.0019670266,0.16481045,0.0019301292,0.00018272396,0.0005214752,0.00008717617,0.27778304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95516545,0.0005672327,0.00044859905,0.02293118,0.00021351852,0.000050588675,0.000075538315,0.000017183671,0.020530753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952728,0.0010561277,0.00020933127,0.0006695582,0.0010340225,0.0017582204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99654084,0.0015433613,0.00026970467,0.0001808054,0.0005054325,0.0009598442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048586554,0.00014193186,0.00037606223,0.001341832,0.020913526,0.016605407,0.0018753685,0.009887349,0.0028090097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013552794,0.00041938617,0.0005952156,0.0021088507,0.010259336,0.0033905148,0.004308684,0.012600933,0.00027850585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011558739,0.00012906308,0.0064681354,0.000056104775,0.000021212172,0.002798704,0.02895474,0.0005445596,0.0013865924,0.9025588,0.04118008,0.015786394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001581819,0.00028243865,0.06895616,0.0006298895,0.000097453965,0.001527242,0.06338752,0.0018643938,0.0026330359,0.1071483,0.7530208,0.00029457992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41811982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.61497515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41811982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02994007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026017683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8313722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258551930","doi":"","title":"Statutory Bills of Rights: You Read Words In, You Read Words Out, You Take Parliament's Clear Intention and You Shake It All About","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Parliament; Law; Political science; Bill of rights; Power (physics); Statutory interpretation; Style (visual arts); Human rights; Politics; History","score_opus":0.019700943518734203,"score_gpt":0.29167693482587514,"score_spread":0.27197599130714095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258551930","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024864178,0.001488884,0.008739081,0.094580844,0.00092249986,0.000034012315,0.00020634993,0.00012281173,0.8690413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8302589,0.0010391403,0.0032004674,0.0212789,0.00036337186,0.000100267964,0.00017095075,0.00008753822,0.14350058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99359304,0.0025656226,0.00026262252,0.00035619104,0.0022736343,0.0009489075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99220896,0.0045023537,0.0008732108,0.0007932316,0.0012053539,0.00041680093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004751106,0.00024585048,0.00028432676,0.00076833984,0.0043062195,0.007237322,0.00080428825,0.0039553097,0.009318861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02023255,0.000261146,0.0002352125,0.0014686924,0.0166669,0.0048177135,0.0023771701,0.0053242473,0.0028286425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022035647,0.0000037563557,0.00008159585,0.0000056874355,7.1267436e-7,0.0000068518434,0.0013314962,0.000017529297,0.000031147152,0.9875925,0.009063137,0.0018634642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030487108,0.000027452965,0.0030862049,0.00017228823,0.000008045366,0.000089228575,0.005246678,0.00025002589,0.0004045472,0.5024041,0.4882499,0.000030994983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02806636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04669141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02806636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004847162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069229733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05580598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259161801","doi":"","title":"Australia's Federal Courts: Their Origins, Structures and Jurisdiction","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Federal court; Law; Political science; Federal jurisdiction","score_opus":0.016407602690471326,"score_gpt":0.29413263690399627,"score_spread":0.27772503421352496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259161801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68577605,0.0062167286,0.0046427464,0.013711697,0.00008439323,0.00010039528,0.0001830767,0.000069975926,0.28921494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98238105,0.0013063394,0.0018035342,0.0005243818,0.000017411738,0.00002616979,0.00002501255,0.0000069534626,0.013909195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806994,0.00061830325,0.00009792975,0.00021595242,0.0005835839,0.00041425333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965629,0.0009862819,0.00064484676,0.00021306708,0.0010047399,0.0005882698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017871582,0.00008033798,0.00015174394,0.0025903017,0.0052042427,0.0038245854,0.0005403985,0.0009135899,0.003022011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005981368,0.00027277184,0.00013351253,0.0022624668,0.0037008426,0.0014767542,0.0020490864,0.0013512791,0.0002742692],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029875922,0.00005348844,0.038283475,0.00015853044,0.000025699916,0.0006222869,0.061809674,0.0005784718,0.0014174447,0.7616088,0.008157309,0.127255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001703269,0.0001446295,0.48202375,0.0008395213,0.0000703343,0.0012042492,0.021862373,0.004034174,0.0008117063,0.084524244,0.4043429,0.0001251448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16222332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34713554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16222332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009216708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010656029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32255816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260176686","doi":"10.82308/28636","title":"Réflexion critique sur la méthode moderne d'interprétation","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Supreme court; Law; Statute; Criticism; Doctrine; Philosophy; Legislator; Epistemology; Political science; Legislation; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03335210635263822,"score_gpt":0.2849623662951908,"score_spread":0.2516102599425526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260176686","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027930478,0.099457934,0.1131647,0.28769073,0.018983198,0.00008585689,0.00030010898,0.0003605913,0.47716388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38078922,0.05831045,0.118910976,0.11567648,0.07059211,0.001500746,0.0004440163,0.0015236811,0.25225237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9628143,0.02055233,0.0010561055,0.0032332148,0.011251855,0.0010921893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97774,0.016646665,0.00074090663,0.001845047,0.0028037385,0.00022362765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022278354,0.0015982996,0.0019371363,0.0050803022,0.0063029695,0.016059197,0.004653509,0.009580035,0.0066300994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023327228,0.0007564483,0.0020205257,0.0038139396,0.055794667,0.014987502,0.004990034,0.023078553,0.003156439],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043359078,0.000002889034,0.0000140779675,0.000038487553,0.0000040326854,0.000015374002,0.0007468122,0.00004389439,0.000023062941,0.99016845,0.0068548797,0.0020838655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018568271,0.000007833591,0.00007310276,0.00028634458,0.0000067803194,0.00010614937,0.00039409366,0.0004988628,0.00016052261,0.6199911,0.37843746,0.00001919866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01460441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009047839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022278354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019199684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011286707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1393041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260391119","doi":"","title":"Democracy Vs. Rule of Law: Does the Court Really Control the Elected Legislature?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Supreme court; Legislation; Judicial review; Legislature; Constitution; Judicial independence","score_opus":0.006214508512688446,"score_gpt":0.2546600247890411,"score_spread":0.24844551627635264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260391119","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02836641,0.04833774,0.012666557,0.46856135,0.0039146175,0.000044394186,0.00015036891,0.00009060863,0.43786785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9011706,0.013297337,0.0014209319,0.04866398,0.0074009346,0.000075120246,0.0000978326,0.00015110342,0.027722139],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98763335,0.0056752795,0.00029777247,0.0018366191,0.0021536371,0.0024033636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98556906,0.009658285,0.0012136475,0.00086015614,0.0014110737,0.001287745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011554255,0.00036299106,0.0009980305,0.0017858826,0.00684642,0.013378019,0.0018046165,0.006813466,0.008412389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021456033,0.00033374873,0.0005343212,0.0021734568,0.03917718,0.01365424,0.0027157897,0.010437154,0.0016938959],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024327688,0.000018832536,0.000761922,0.000045305045,0.00000928593,0.00004239123,0.0015424773,0.00011496283,0.00004299811,0.9728247,0.012536963,0.012035795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068446956,0.000044119824,0.0021558928,0.0003035086,0.000015733538,0.00007652906,0.0017715794,0.0003501344,0.0001956235,0.8835727,0.11142011,0.000025666264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019671414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014779769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019671414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007989982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007615355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06110549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261418248","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900003593","title":"Resituating the Judicialization of Politics: Bush v. Gore as a Global Trend","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Politics; Political science; Polity; Presidency; Supreme court; Law; Democracy","score_opus":0.03707364720469677,"score_gpt":0.3043663065438004,"score_spread":0.2672926593391037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261418248","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16924107,0.011511703,0.0013270358,0.4277789,0.0016754888,0.000042580396,0.000094717,0.000041622035,0.38828686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9051148,0.0020971252,0.00044538817,0.06819744,0.0005437311,0.000029543247,0.000026447162,0.000052677686,0.023492856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970298,0.0011248249,0.00006955438,0.00038265347,0.00041911993,0.000974102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99728787,0.0014969027,0.0002181245,0.00022266644,0.00032916287,0.00044522164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004931497,0.00023451405,0.00035148868,0.0010893709,0.007783172,0.008673587,0.00077221583,0.007974656,0.003413076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008141334,0.00021102928,0.00033941356,0.0013634922,0.016330076,0.0060849297,0.004626998,0.009445712,0.00030245795],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003941888,0.000020936744,0.0018987727,0.00004430589,0.0000105492445,0.0005840065,0.017499864,0.0001144082,0.00052419043,0.92682153,0.038984362,0.013457627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000111094356,0.00008402059,0.013215614,0.00045441338,0.00009199212,0.0004921324,0.03791659,0.00045474633,0.0017140503,0.2887093,0.6566675,0.00008860272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048328687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15557824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048328687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057624094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007445863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09609479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261444281","doi":"10.59962/9780774856010-003","title":"Reality Checks: Presuming Innocence and Proving Guilt in <i>Charter</i> Welfare Cases","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Presumption of innocence; Innocence; Presumption; Law; Neutrality; Political science; Welfare; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Welfare rights; Law and economics; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.03614795310173334,"score_gpt":0.2200564479644186,"score_spread":0.18390849486268523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261444281","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07163149,0.005484326,0.011848087,0.08718144,0.0012166062,0.00016745106,0.00018481625,0.00008217518,0.8222035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95555675,0.001968589,0.004369326,0.01688448,0.0006222377,0.00015472186,0.00009896289,0.00004012734,0.02030488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9812165,0.01193296,0.00054660486,0.0012380119,0.0028607466,0.0022051749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9780546,0.017304458,0.0016289438,0.0010278779,0.0014157004,0.0005684691],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018985948,0.000509365,0.00080761866,0.0032274246,0.01048623,0.014991755,0.0032056158,0.0072418903,0.0049831397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03147088,0.00087635743,0.0009062242,0.0018880581,0.043664172,0.013643874,0.0064173066,0.0131658595,0.00057807326],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000149378175,0.000021522195,0.000434209,0.000036429938,0.0000079421825,0.00056242873,0.0069748606,0.00017741407,0.000088042194,0.97494376,0.01192551,0.0048129773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012081469,0.00007991649,0.0029158858,0.001035071,0.00006376635,0.0005246065,0.01641569,0.0015603416,0.0007444303,0.888719,0.0876906,0.00012990879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05138716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06758501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9486128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011922429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009727708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10217613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261683698","doi":"","title":"The Modern Constitutional State: A Defence","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.026576567102528842,"score_gpt":0.29064047097933227,"score_spread":0.26406390387680345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261683698","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04329399,0.014262925,0.029115846,0.2446547,0.0024118375,0.00005906726,0.0002909245,0.00008864535,0.66582215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94139594,0.0029487594,0.004064106,0.014501468,0.0051781735,0.00012986604,0.00008167764,0.00007321536,0.03162688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973346,0.001244731,0.00009244495,0.0005446479,0.0005347862,0.00024881255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957769,0.0024637452,0.00036288172,0.00073637115,0.0004563568,0.00020379371],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004340908,0.00036987904,0.0008007761,0.0021129558,0.0041836817,0.007583217,0.0016784191,0.0077616484,0.009163936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008851797,0.00038621176,0.00063723105,0.0020479427,0.040126607,0.011440089,0.0034941435,0.0095396275,0.0010270072],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019525883,0.0000020026323,0.000022185382,0.0000040096465,7.844688e-7,0.0000024447213,0.000105436855,0.000019636554,0.000006711667,0.99871147,0.0006377385,0.00048552276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008963914,0.0000050247386,0.00008783527,0.000020204405,0.0000023496411,0.000014315664,0.00014068831,0.00013549734,0.000025656575,0.98562616,0.013929996,0.0000032682199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027966443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030457375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009163936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040377285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003566406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030656457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262111829","doi":"","title":"What's the Issue?: Judicial Dispute Resolution in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law in context","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Economic Justice; Project commissioning; Function (biology); Political science; Law; Publishing; Resolution (logic); Sociology; Public relations; Computer science","score_opus":0.0212712727829017,"score_gpt":0.2739185031918245,"score_spread":0.2526472304089228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262111829","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48511094,0.031251594,0.0021792527,0.22766769,0.0011223309,0.00023449895,0.0007170725,0.000069349095,0.2516473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9693499,0.00574901,0.0009594723,0.008883059,0.000107284235,0.000029900455,0.00010111279,0.000016330623,0.014803877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98924273,0.0014097936,0.00033152275,0.00070138305,0.0040677413,0.004246849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98928994,0.0026207895,0.000809273,0.00016589684,0.004606874,0.0025071616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054269205,0.00021738953,0.00052417273,0.0023877171,0.0386065,0.010850117,0.0028865698,0.0045181816,0.0051863515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01977345,0.0003589398,0.0003213817,0.0060928883,0.008231683,0.002351514,0.0036740883,0.004619963,0.0002964756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018280803,0.00020271025,0.050946705,0.0005882758,0.0000931863,0.0023370879,0.091568284,0.0028520653,0.0008583713,0.63768166,0.109649256,0.103039496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002109016,0.00010067796,0.13280435,0.0011426355,0.00014590682,0.0006338765,0.15752006,0.004214456,0.0012814723,0.049507134,0.6520885,0.00035007103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99696904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99855095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18643746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18643746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3412898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9436172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262468117","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Failure or Constitutional Odyssey? What can we learn from Canada and Switzerland","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cadmus - EUI Research Repository (European University Institute)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Constitutional law; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.07661533051830999,"score_gpt":0.2697765042388192,"score_spread":0.19316117372050923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262468117","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07756403,0.08677043,0.001906191,0.38367578,0.0018588529,0.000057532074,0.00078106625,0.00012624572,0.44725984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8896263,0.048720933,0.0010027487,0.022423226,0.00058000867,0.00005099231,0.0005421075,0.00017212071,0.036881454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929892,0.0012974513,0.000103174585,0.0007241666,0.0019175251,0.0029684585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99250436,0.00297492,0.0003771751,0.0005389779,0.0020952874,0.0015093387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004647776,0.00075409125,0.0011456213,0.004069113,0.022261238,0.016907914,0.0024747103,0.004399311,0.009480867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014357813,0.00025622814,0.0005319037,0.008054669,0.03453424,0.00997957,0.005136333,0.008755539,0.0007926233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000879271,0.000034946577,0.0047760825,0.00035467857,0.000036941652,0.0007440074,0.049818028,0.00078464556,0.00013860632,0.83309513,0.06351815,0.04661085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039470393,0.0000329958,0.020199457,0.0023142046,0.00005406263,0.00028348318,0.10421734,0.0008990821,0.0003549633,0.11106931,0.7603506,0.00018506787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9890075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.989806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.857561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14243904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14449784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263238008","doi":"","title":"Equality Rights, Ratio Identification, and the Un/Predictable Judicial Path Not Taken: Quebec (Attorney General) v. A and R. v. Ibanescu","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Paragraph; Charter; Political science; Law; Jurisprudence; Identification (biology); Path (computing); Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Human rights; Computer science","score_opus":0.018525201337505463,"score_gpt":0.26042981437778356,"score_spread":0.2419046130402781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263238008","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10364135,0.0055043506,0.0065186988,0.10360231,0.0011977454,0.00014892918,0.0004826272,0.00011749862,0.7787865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93125653,0.0010773529,0.0017852554,0.019691652,0.00016840486,0.00005393009,0.00008716747,0.000067297704,0.04581246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895761,0.0019541718,0.00021422634,0.0013879635,0.003513201,0.003354349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99601966,0.0010017996,0.00033447644,0.00019878913,0.0018309444,0.0006144329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006074366,0.000433352,0.00045266826,0.001628617,0.017408766,0.011039748,0.0027113212,0.005591261,0.0055908156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011656219,0.00034046115,0.0005861869,0.0014485546,0.020785902,0.0037916105,0.0029276756,0.007783246,0.0005167681],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023294278,0.000012470598,0.0017693102,0.000026148384,0.00000726264,0.000286986,0.0041290945,0.000118255906,0.00015174488,0.9659246,0.018902833,0.008648143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001645332,0.0000952395,0.037882403,0.00087322824,0.00014392039,0.00082558667,0.03964547,0.0033927062,0.0049296385,0.29575464,0.6158245,0.00046816334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9773243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.074791715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.074791715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08653883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5426544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264634278","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1024","title":"Are Jurisprudential Debates Conceptual?: Some Lessons from Democratic Theory","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Democracy; Politics; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Institution; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.046577924553256045,"score_gpt":0.3219174592072489,"score_spread":0.27533953465399286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264634278","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023391627,0.017589746,0.070646465,0.61342853,0.001379729,0.000055062512,0.000082469174,0.000101038146,0.2733254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94747967,0.005975265,0.012583238,0.019942464,0.0031720612,0.00025682853,0.000063592146,0.00014264607,0.010384208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96867764,0.02085735,0.00074488774,0.0025943273,0.0050792424,0.002046442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95875907,0.030531893,0.0023994176,0.0036942305,0.0029410745,0.0016742562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03403425,0.00064477266,0.0015370571,0.0035438603,0.013603179,0.02153151,0.0049283532,0.011769775,0.005803891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046476305,0.0005796346,0.0013806939,0.004289428,0.10018095,0.031818375,0.010055601,0.018110745,0.00093491137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012566142,0.0000047801223,0.000028131175,0.000008512952,0.0000011812319,0.000007982,0.00079112145,0.000051186944,0.0000059467343,0.99791735,0.0005023593,0.0006802826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051486572,0.0000014845309,0.00005096826,0.000025076271,0.000001204945,0.000010749231,0.0005280618,0.00018856539,0.000013895926,0.9911506,0.008021725,0.0000025011582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049936813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045779087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03403425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011621032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008737133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1799925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265388694","doi":"","title":"Improving the Judicial Review of Common-Law Argumentation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Normative; Rhetoric; Constructive; Epistemology; Legal practice; Political science; Sociology; Law; Dimension (graph theory); Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.02019405078621806,"score_gpt":0.29361998606120404,"score_spread":0.273425935274986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265388694","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17261055,0.081897154,0.3437169,0.18172917,0.010957197,0.002451617,0.0005775945,0.0024557097,0.20360406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8412556,0.009658739,0.13035087,0.004661356,0.0038847635,0.00057567935,0.0005208121,0.00038194272,0.008710279],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.59867066,0.30179578,0.022874393,0.011748627,0.060927566,0.0039830017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2938203,0.4200214,0.03045601,0.056330744,0.19363286,0.00573866],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.27458373,0.0008082522,0.0031644457,0.018654544,0.0066531524,0.017708806,0.0055925865,0.0058894185,0.0060386406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.60587937,0.0011651209,0.0010451518,0.008112463,0.00729316,0.020719785,0.01042786,0.005424067,0.0021577524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029841892,0.00022043465,0.007122161,0.0017784893,0.00024557233,0.00047710387,0.015211341,0.0039704717,0.0019812498,0.25725725,0.054969963,0.6564676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005120557,0.00042610796,0.014512476,0.004704052,0.00055438967,0.00079595076,0.011395973,0.032416914,0.0084037045,0.46520457,0.46066675,0.00040707111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051873624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0078336615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27458373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009708412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02651433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89456743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265481439","doi":"","title":"Money Bills and the Use of the Royal Recommendation in Canada: Practice Versus Principle?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Constitution; Law; Legislation; Appropriation; Political science; Principle of legality; House of Representatives; Legal tender; Context (archaeology); Scrutiny; Law and economics; Legislature; Parliament; Sociology; Economics; Politics; Currency; History","score_opus":0.031110706033444364,"score_gpt":0.2786483147056715,"score_spread":0.2475376086722271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265481439","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033040013,0.016658396,0.0036917508,0.32515064,0.0012734719,0.00008936948,0.00026087728,0.0001118372,0.6197237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7516207,0.013968128,0.004617199,0.05239357,0.0007601704,0.00010596709,0.00013153917,0.0001597093,0.17624304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98347765,0.0023589407,0.00046937767,0.0015632731,0.007835102,0.0042955917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99176675,0.003070065,0.00062845636,0.0005120866,0.002974128,0.0010484677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007938396,0.0006477908,0.00069170364,0.0021057043,0.023094298,0.01681311,0.0046238066,0.011128603,0.009213978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030365571,0.00087435014,0.0005590216,0.00661674,0.039288446,0.010031947,0.0048989714,0.0128064,0.0008870735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010995178,0.000008391313,0.00052226026,0.000044888635,0.0000043551663,0.000090115376,0.0073059266,0.00011135682,0.00005916079,0.9621722,0.01629118,0.013379141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005390062,0.000048761653,0.009414804,0.00086667424,0.000045477915,0.00019597328,0.022119824,0.0010484678,0.00055001443,0.14901027,0.8163768,0.00026907193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9898928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99152374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13964717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13964717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24667925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265527373","doi":"","title":"The Paradox of Judicial Deference","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Doctrine; Judicial deference; Supreme court; Legitimacy; Political science; Mistake; Law; Judicial review; Standard of review; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.010319892063752105,"score_gpt":0.2612454779054094,"score_spread":0.2509255858416573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265527373","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2668225,0.008212892,0.02414327,0.07845458,0.0005999796,0.00003914829,0.00010117032,0.00011177737,0.6215146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937702,0.0005300993,0.0005335757,0.0017861038,0.000085184394,0.0000074889567,0.0000071651607,0.000009186159,0.0032711357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897866,0.0025166892,0.00020225618,0.00072961434,0.0050163623,0.0017484103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98953164,0.0057873414,0.00072213216,0.00084899826,0.0025230753,0.0005867336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008480474,0.00017847285,0.00046963457,0.0016747141,0.006728302,0.0068931263,0.0013956651,0.0032210127,0.0026477869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03568474,0.0002093782,0.0003121411,0.0013704024,0.02134476,0.0043487074,0.0036873254,0.0041076797,0.00024057474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008863533,0.000004756258,0.00030891443,0.000014222713,0.0000028685045,0.000088760404,0.0020976814,0.00023485826,0.00010006619,0.9911786,0.0015610364,0.0043994226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029962008,0.000016658136,0.0023022268,0.000109219895,0.00001354966,0.00019605922,0.0024896534,0.0011152644,0.00028535075,0.9371844,0.056225974,0.000031740394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12947515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.098112084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12947515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014936924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015703112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.257443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265995899","doi":"","title":"The Justice of Access: Who Should Have Standing to Challenge the Constitutional Adequacy of Legal Aid?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Economic Justice; Constitutional right; Discretion; Public interest; Sociology","score_opus":0.06554079387765922,"score_gpt":0.3671508948911148,"score_spread":0.3016101010134556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265995899","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062051848,0.0072096037,0.007979988,0.4812751,0.00093573116,0.000056756962,0.00010589873,0.000042426465,0.4403427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9164954,0.002085095,0.0010495245,0.056359563,0.0014491453,0.00007018935,0.000032440388,0.000032302112,0.022426412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890258,0.0038230976,0.00030063107,0.0010096453,0.002384976,0.0034558713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99317884,0.004056878,0.00040642396,0.0004306661,0.0010944775,0.00083275925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011243178,0.00035644133,0.0007651545,0.0014651346,0.012005807,0.011793087,0.002291715,0.013888985,0.0069398014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021369116,0.0002934962,0.0006589894,0.0012259819,0.047684696,0.015603007,0.008471194,0.012035441,0.00077034935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007009288,0.000011440236,0.00036507545,0.000014134043,0.00000508992,0.00008377047,0.003925513,0.0000439986,0.00007899562,0.9879645,0.0042951223,0.0032054386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048377275,0.000041106432,0.0020974188,0.0002692171,0.00002235101,0.00014439385,0.010866478,0.00028448936,0.0003048617,0.85906434,0.12680884,0.000048122216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09501955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08880611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09501955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008779495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013334405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18893296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266086422","doi":"","title":"Canada as Constitutional Exporter: The Rise of the 'Canadian Model' of Constitutionalism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Charter; Political science; Constitutional economics; Declaration; Constitutional theory; Constitutional law; Law; Power (physics); Law and economics; Democracy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.014168810572163484,"score_gpt":0.2526520373107017,"score_spread":0.2384832267385382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266086422","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06408618,0.005858283,0.005000916,0.14078987,0.0006184132,0.00003500994,0.00024869046,0.00008102917,0.7832816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9454764,0.0031271377,0.0019847217,0.009340357,0.0001279843,0.00001794047,0.00007553458,0.00006475268,0.03978516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99335974,0.0010806838,0.00009462057,0.00080283306,0.002809986,0.0018521685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99415284,0.0019869718,0.00024823815,0.00038816745,0.0023136695,0.0009100547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043134857,0.00028812862,0.00043143655,0.0018433427,0.022178024,0.014603499,0.001334324,0.0028485574,0.005742937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009870293,0.0002636256,0.0003330882,0.0031657096,0.03001938,0.0045051756,0.0032929545,0.0079793995,0.00021206646],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005263739,0.0000024302808,0.000474488,0.000012993955,0.0000017172537,0.00006327118,0.005126841,0.00013718064,0.00004628772,0.9834116,0.00698128,0.0037366727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023853627,0.000019767978,0.0058140624,0.00022804321,0.000030041807,0.0002373496,0.019013895,0.0011251098,0.00032166028,0.1935358,0.779542,0.00010848815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9788472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98524076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12429061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12429061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15021165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9017957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266174008","doi":"","title":"Role of the Media and Public Perceptions, The Proceedings of the Canada-United States Law Institute Conference on Multiple Actors in Canada-U.S. Relations: The Role of the Media and Public Perceptions: Introduction","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada-United States law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Media coverage; Media relations; Media studies; Sociology; Public administration","score_opus":0.015672258813934196,"score_gpt":0.2143093761541981,"score_spread":0.1986371173402639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266174008","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058366187,0.22520097,0.003145252,0.2682007,0.0021603378,0.00011617722,0.0016411277,0.000046158548,0.44112313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7717157,0.14206424,0.003537207,0.021202466,0.0030636638,0.0001410593,0.0002936896,0.00008099041,0.057901047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998038,0.00049017434,0.00004400894,0.00016730765,0.0008999326,0.00036054454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99317884,0.0047813584,0.00036578192,0.000103301616,0.0011956857,0.0003751371],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030605653,0.00044688987,0.00033469984,0.0038335521,0.0063762586,0.018880738,0.0012796742,0.003099626,0.0067499974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005382502,0.00035435677,0.0004046078,0.0056656245,0.014010746,0.0067781694,0.002024443,0.0032712207,0.00034881022],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007237924,0.000092258415,0.016152916,0.0008148841,0.000044707336,0.00023032368,0.032873802,0.00066990603,0.0005480252,0.8220454,0.06865456,0.05780097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017653821,0.000045354096,0.067094855,0.0031464559,0.000095267154,0.00013186445,0.09149611,0.0007872061,0.0010652747,0.11788017,0.7181186,0.00012109984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6904981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8353838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3095019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028282719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02951555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6226492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267311004","doi":"","title":"Book Review of 'Interpreting Constitutions: A Comparative Study'","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Terminology; Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Comparative law; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025754087873389956,"score_gpt":0.35510309340604823,"score_spread":0.3293490055326583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267311004","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001172058,0.7739171,0.0011931568,0.027743157,0.007527518,0.000026596876,0.0002869325,0.00005204983,0.18808143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021355633,0.86423177,0.0020849088,0.01037487,0.008925892,0.000088260844,0.000797732,0.00015049413,0.091990404],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987941,0.00039572857,0.000056248096,0.00012212063,0.0005643737,0.000067432404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99577963,0.0029763703,0.00017426694,0.00010706051,0.00084405305,0.00011867233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011781254,0.00053395005,0.0008538809,0.0049916063,0.0015779599,0.0037907732,0.0010959061,0.0015632816,0.020756684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004860159,0.00031788222,0.00039932632,0.01228638,0.003022199,0.0033426972,0.0008346357,0.0026052832,0.00543999],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016229564,0.000036748355,0.00017522315,0.0017685009,0.000014799723,0.00007047436,0.0010335055,0.00022313985,0.00011231524,0.08119171,0.8047781,0.1105792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004385362,0.000010849994,0.00095516705,0.0015845648,0.0000066312664,0.000119374934,0.0004496889,0.00004468605,0.00003121148,0.005151246,0.99163616,0.000006064209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014923528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026497178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020756684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046806983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051402184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06943804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267705183","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511511042.007","title":"Constitutions, Judicial Review, Moral Rights, and Democracy: Disentangling the Issues","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Democracy; Law and economics; Judicial review; Law; Human rights; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03743009855371055,"score_gpt":0.2509015105689267,"score_spread":0.21347141201521613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267705183","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006315316,0.081408165,0.004026252,0.061150584,0.0011634951,0.000019755642,0.00004389695,0.000029416484,0.84584314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61050755,0.07865549,0.00601174,0.02125914,0.0050008353,0.0001494314,0.00012552748,0.00011415454,0.27817625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99605286,0.0023126001,0.00009701439,0.00019325031,0.0010670926,0.0002771503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937751,0.005093417,0.00023197762,0.00023759846,0.00053538685,0.00012648989],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038222442,0.00025202183,0.00042377584,0.0016756185,0.00361158,0.0073117022,0.0008064562,0.0021973501,0.0067301258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008764059,0.00023311473,0.00020691076,0.002451641,0.021133358,0.0052800514,0.0012872356,0.0037798767,0.0007673538],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013199541,0.0000042220445,0.000024872643,0.000023521268,0.0000010754653,0.000009105912,0.000704446,0.00006028822,0.000016320853,0.98234195,0.01198251,0.0048303036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072083817,0.000005835956,0.00031524626,0.0002617705,0.0000039286983,0.000028730788,0.0012139075,0.00015446972,0.00007953103,0.7299808,0.26794183,0.0000067986766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00803133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016720446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00803133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005639202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075009298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04091543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267901771","doi":"","title":"The End of Constitutional Exemptions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Sentence; Section (typography); Point (geometry); Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Computer science; History; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03085938485652937,"score_gpt":0.28053756514632855,"score_spread":0.24967818028979918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267901771","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02603136,0.0062907343,0.021827841,0.048518825,0.0020807595,0.000050806895,0.00026338382,0.0001140967,0.8948222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8506677,0.002675582,0.008441181,0.050926086,0.00312642,0.00033955192,0.0003735894,0.00017669023,0.083273225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9812464,0.006444825,0.0010986581,0.0031281651,0.0055441684,0.0025377618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853152,0.008522695,0.0008812463,0.0028122026,0.0018523112,0.0006162693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014336693,0.00047535854,0.0009176115,0.0015170947,0.0077038365,0.009740072,0.0019072291,0.009835761,0.009157158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031719238,0.00067493174,0.0009901758,0.0008568125,0.020784518,0.013442685,0.008698107,0.01687374,0.0025000633],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000142160625,0.000007107994,0.000059972986,0.000011873922,0.0000018308344,0.000033723227,0.00052287604,0.000031834108,0.00010470983,0.99313015,0.0023645675,0.0037170611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027906915,0.00007024662,0.00054143096,0.0002278473,0.000010493856,0.00011249255,0.00052991975,0.00012528153,0.00071552803,0.8076106,0.19000164,0.000026643469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002453462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026116464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014336693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032907892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003927628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075820565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268096797","doi":"","title":"Understanding Retroactivity: When the Past Just Ain't What It Used to Be","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Statute; Legislature; Confusion; Political science; Temporality; Law; Statute of limitations; Adjudication; Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10643813424059254,"score_gpt":0.3054111160437165,"score_spread":0.19897298180312398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268096797","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11835978,0.013857012,0.3645766,0.07778746,0.001830706,0.00014934834,0.00024593822,0.0002336813,0.42295948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9595049,0.0035913072,0.020479655,0.0051165167,0.00061751885,0.00015008627,0.00014953637,0.000144169,0.010246212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99111044,0.0044063334,0.00056820555,0.0013972324,0.001828505,0.0006893618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98421174,0.010097462,0.001781928,0.0022180725,0.001330867,0.00035989616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018627763,0.00047544693,0.0007567317,0.0027692572,0.0052093705,0.013757574,0.00257296,0.0043028207,0.0025049462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026997106,0.0005130522,0.0007650302,0.002503206,0.05571948,0.036383025,0.0056288927,0.006844523,0.00046847097],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009403562,0.0000045643233,0.0004673724,0.000020988458,0.000003506005,0.00006236331,0.008818287,0.000107725275,0.0000880721,0.9870394,0.0003477935,0.0030304166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009131698,0.000027119231,0.00074936426,0.00030535375,0.000020134705,0.00025364102,0.009434513,0.0006914263,0.0006255563,0.9101015,0.07775068,0.00003161251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068241297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005583805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018627763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005106815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005405713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0985142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268494103","doi":"","title":"The Rule of Law in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Constraint (computer-aided design); Law; Limiting; Rule of law; Political science; Order (exchange); Power (physics); Judicial review; Law and economics; Executive power; Constitutional law; Economics; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.008978439414927082,"score_gpt":0.2567097000052102,"score_spread":0.24773126059028314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268494103","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028686598,0.013470785,0.002686401,0.043907836,0.00079891214,0.00015217479,0.00057208363,0.0000855412,0.9096398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81570035,0.014508718,0.005306789,0.018415732,0.00026890947,0.0001315391,0.0003493021,0.00007328679,0.14524545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909429,0.0007303023,0.00028186935,0.0008271669,0.0044003692,0.0028175095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926198,0.0018894336,0.00029096412,0.00033040557,0.003941953,0.0009275012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038326585,0.00033970817,0.0006156382,0.0032170299,0.02369862,0.012210847,0.001990868,0.0041719954,0.010011699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015654402,0.00054498645,0.00056286354,0.0050830315,0.016022583,0.0021771134,0.002451388,0.005748287,0.0006740485],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009083018,0.000007106737,0.0010453464,0.0000696223,0.00000810022,0.00022146523,0.0022688087,0.00062355626,0.00010641412,0.9551373,0.026642315,0.013860923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033884244,0.00001575771,0.008080842,0.0005375112,0.000052248422,0.00016299653,0.0037815818,0.0013127645,0.00024038975,0.1127785,0.8728855,0.00011795156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9968991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99743396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16372356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16372356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.33105162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9699621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268715355","doi":"","title":"Putting the Past Behind Us? Prospective Judicial and Legislative Constitutional Remedies","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Charter; Supreme court; Legislation; Law; Adjudication; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.013316321955796984,"score_gpt":0.2686208509659573,"score_spread":0.2553045290101603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268715355","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020343492,0.03154613,0.028419556,0.70966756,0.009621714,0.00018177796,0.00011233073,0.0003023433,0.19980505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7158647,0.016507328,0.027573902,0.16853285,0.005924894,0.00029881316,0.00011752428,0.00023556658,0.06494444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9721986,0.009016839,0.0016924328,0.0035904993,0.0076748827,0.005826761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96222675,0.017522646,0.0030064336,0.0055861957,0.0071533006,0.0045045996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032074835,0.0006516647,0.0012040462,0.0023515017,0.014587998,0.021582715,0.0038648706,0.018115016,0.013969719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060715422,0.0007980361,0.0013392263,0.0015023357,0.031251974,0.026116416,0.00753704,0.022750504,0.0013273901],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016048734,0.00005312784,0.0006394519,0.000063725805,0.000015286916,0.00016725512,0.0016022922,0.000206216,0.00017869534,0.96200275,0.014859218,0.020196036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007811246,0.00013074605,0.002164111,0.0013661067,0.000081131984,0.00034600674,0.0069293533,0.0010650696,0.0011783018,0.63143986,0.35501635,0.00020481176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031629916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056726385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032074835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015537258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04032484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16962999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268977263","doi":"","title":"Resource Questions in Social and Economic Rights Enforcement: A Preliminary View","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Judicial deference; Legislature; Political science; Deference; Judicial review; Government (linguistics); Principal (computer security); Law and economics; Politics; Separation of powers; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.024685912512057488,"score_gpt":0.29974564497178363,"score_spread":0.27505973245972615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268977263","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037978176,0.08988264,0.020755542,0.25114906,0.001174848,0.00008363386,0.00022549496,0.0000319457,0.5987187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84278244,0.058278967,0.008326027,0.030252647,0.0044863764,0.00026939725,0.00021028257,0.000047273905,0.055346496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971301,0.0013508258,0.00011574611,0.00034097774,0.000681976,0.0003803691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935917,0.0051646964,0.0003766283,0.00027991092,0.000419293,0.0001677107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041418104,0.00040345656,0.0006136394,0.0023294596,0.004006069,0.010058031,0.0011813601,0.0064721955,0.0075110784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008196542,0.00035953333,0.00082929444,0.0025615739,0.024505764,0.016906653,0.0028577892,0.006049821,0.0007943825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049828514,0.000008283115,0.00016459805,0.000031433985,0.0000015289934,0.000024910314,0.00060808373,0.00009197591,0.00004721794,0.99424756,0.0014168253,0.003352553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009221982,0.000028441564,0.0013749128,0.0002786879,0.000006599817,0.00006587766,0.0017735645,0.0003801431,0.00013192599,0.88265526,0.11328569,0.000009733176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007716317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073524085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010058031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041382085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038189646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030024886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269084978","doi":"10.22145/flr.31.2.2","title":"Burdened by Proof: How the Australian Refugee Review Tribunal has Failed Lesbian and Gay Asylum Seekers","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Refugee; Lesbian; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Political science; Project commissioning; Criminology; Refugee law; Sociology; Publishing; Gender studies; Medicine","score_opus":0.05716202341117506,"score_gpt":0.31529697470194257,"score_spread":0.2581349512907675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269084978","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54151255,0.0077996645,0.0015811208,0.33533663,0.0015933758,0.00014935562,0.000055415843,0.000059626163,0.11191218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9169827,0.0012863643,0.00042302915,0.048825234,0.00031688242,0.000069807065,0.000016546164,0.00004389228,0.03203552],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96026105,0.018599378,0.0015447183,0.0029770243,0.007066374,0.00955148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9491938,0.025010485,0.0041818665,0.0025456387,0.009522088,0.009546105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05179718,0.0003130092,0.00096677913,0.0027759797,0.050842118,0.022674719,0.0041790083,0.017310273,0.0064870585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11265309,0.0010813433,0.00068692456,0.0021372216,0.023764707,0.00741983,0.012061396,0.015946763,0.0008728202],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012448,0.0001942104,0.019120572,0.0003104309,0.00009319121,0.008891296,0.48938334,0.0004627587,0.00088680617,0.36516827,0.06725891,0.048105802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008948488,0.00030826166,0.059046175,0.0010409699,0.00016177526,0.0020988097,0.3459248,0.0015431802,0.0010628524,0.050061066,0.5382965,0.00036609688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39087588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5010131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39087588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023448508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04340745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7772014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269421503","doi":"","title":"Promotion of Federally Appointed Judges and Appointment of Chief Justices: The Unfinished Agenda","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Scrutiny; Political science; Supreme court; Transparency (behavior); Accountability; Politics; Constitution; Government (linguistics); Court of record; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.019756678315162236,"score_gpt":0.2852712489414722,"score_spread":0.26551457062630995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269421503","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034062326,0.05015322,0.0036310006,0.8100503,0.0032067753,0.000088559595,0.0001522076,0.00011054073,0.098544985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86726403,0.022521747,0.0058742343,0.068771414,0.006537218,0.00008602152,0.00010544896,0.00008029122,0.028759653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9619222,0.013022851,0.0012416322,0.0034061703,0.0076213838,0.012785694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9076046,0.04496039,0.007556442,0.003449543,0.016749935,0.01967907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04138577,0.00039344447,0.0011301936,0.004046778,0.01720713,0.018501254,0.0042669196,0.012018063,0.005269236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06977574,0.0009853448,0.00051009574,0.005529223,0.021414971,0.009508491,0.004924681,0.013534136,0.0011039634],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012659664,0.00022323769,0.007364875,0.00051416387,0.00002104462,0.00016289177,0.008676205,0.0006593028,0.00041886905,0.7856931,0.07664651,0.119493194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034817387,0.00022595246,0.055183943,0.0029329753,0.00009594018,0.0002253076,0.013410415,0.0022268705,0.0011986052,0.18887079,0.7350815,0.00019959071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6005161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7315867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6005161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.073011845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17204987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80367315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269697567","doi":"","title":"The Past, Present and Future of Fixed Election Dates in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Democracy; Political science; Public administration; General election; Parliament; Political economy; Law; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.0046840526646839496,"score_gpt":0.23167604349693566,"score_spread":0.22699199083225172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269697567","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37486318,0.02415372,0.0032984545,0.11366448,0.001239633,0.0000912499,0.0016790943,0.00013809343,0.4808721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96304375,0.0035306716,0.0007530748,0.0035026465,0.00010031522,0.000014582902,0.00017676868,0.00004509181,0.028833106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900506,0.0009555201,0.0002007974,0.00078252354,0.0028476494,0.0051628584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896896,0.0023384453,0.000802646,0.00045690467,0.004525234,0.0021871866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005311915,0.0002175411,0.00045088105,0.00230623,0.020931464,0.012487912,0.001812085,0.0019289227,0.005664781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013852459,0.00041329148,0.0004587174,0.004911487,0.013054944,0.0020504293,0.002557519,0.00471601,0.00035963513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000115982366,0.000026753496,0.015927477,0.00017453442,0.000034813926,0.00024568272,0.023362394,0.0014228269,0.0003468682,0.8576557,0.040210295,0.06047661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037432343,0.000050242827,0.13147861,0.0007000226,0.00008722625,0.00011214695,0.038334396,0.00183008,0.00097556424,0.040521186,0.7855341,0.00033887217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.993983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99655724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23699696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23699696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22930275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8849754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269767067","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1183","title":"The Constitutive Paradox of Modern Law: A Comment on Tully","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; Constitutionalism; Democracy; Constitutional law; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.04459802367941434,"score_gpt":0.28966889738774837,"score_spread":0.24507087370833402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269767067","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005048345,0.005991531,0.0031426915,0.947108,0.0023443166,0.000009623928,0.00005664745,0.00005024653,0.036248654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20753829,0.004582115,0.0025838658,0.7569185,0.010708989,0.00011938585,0.00004563637,0.00016944735,0.01733378],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927901,0.002784825,0.00026361475,0.0008854566,0.0025488532,0.0007270687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97998285,0.016155526,0.00092963444,0.0006333737,0.0018950837,0.00040345124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010718455,0.00036405848,0.0010538066,0.0017416145,0.011524662,0.009127685,0.0036895105,0.02679616,0.0031134908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026289726,0.0006746552,0.0011098492,0.0026876403,0.03514086,0.012396831,0.0049979314,0.023217544,0.00094937586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017760452,0.000011532109,0.00011543217,0.00006252538,0.000004617339,0.00010502093,0.00463166,0.000108314154,0.00006278997,0.89957947,0.09327621,0.0020246578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003317396,0.000018760082,0.00040391236,0.0004447025,0.0000149885545,0.00016509573,0.003818633,0.0006790482,0.0003374986,0.6698336,0.32419512,0.000055448694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019338064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019549843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02679616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009398337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00686097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06819004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270138944","doi":"","title":"The Early Hours of the Post-World War II Model of Constitutional Federalism: The Warren Court and the World","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Legitimacy; Political science; Warren Court; Law; Human rights; Jurisprudence; Dignity; Politics","score_opus":0.01195748424761708,"score_gpt":0.2551943990108764,"score_spread":0.24323691476325934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270138944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039688077,0.012148799,0.037040457,0.26543504,0.0021220616,0.000062476785,0.00013995825,0.000072723175,0.6432904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8949155,0.003088511,0.005910676,0.040313892,0.0020174826,0.00017146075,0.000059707014,0.0000792938,0.053443383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930292,0.0035952628,0.00017776382,0.00079756934,0.0015132191,0.0008869622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957022,0.0027325943,0.00026434008,0.0005592884,0.00051402254,0.00022748002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006349,0.00029153706,0.0003857097,0.00089220953,0.0072653363,0.013237844,0.0011749683,0.008330841,0.0027038085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011177336,0.00034658107,0.00041248754,0.0011913049,0.036814887,0.011594989,0.0033205098,0.012354664,0.00039206774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014733521,0.0000012004616,0.000022819408,0.000001598848,5.053594e-7,0.000009328618,0.000416759,0.000025545536,0.000014443197,0.99726725,0.0015953047,0.00064389076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000107787455,0.0000074117484,0.00018579449,0.000060888266,0.0000031350412,0.00002749689,0.0007014961,0.00025048922,0.00011113781,0.9124772,0.08615147,0.000012639013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020987684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020692648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020987684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00877265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077240174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06365037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270175175","doi":"10.1089/elj.2013.0202","title":"Second-Best Deliberative Democracy and Election Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Ideal (ethics); Deliberative democracy; Redistricting; Political science; Law and economics; Democracy; Voting; Election law; Politics; Public administration; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.015450192314946978,"score_gpt":0.30134051025925157,"score_spread":0.2858903179443046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270175175","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045859758,0.0058363373,0.19190921,0.073240295,0.00083381153,0.00014107925,0.00008606525,0.0001980852,0.6818954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97084695,0.00092308974,0.009902627,0.004086753,0.00035137052,0.0001418124,0.000028356528,0.000038491387,0.013680544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9790196,0.012375605,0.0007249921,0.0021233158,0.0033416206,0.0024148643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.975694,0.015684148,0.0024245537,0.003203034,0.0021423523,0.0008519934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019883417,0.00039648637,0.0007284158,0.0015647925,0.0048996457,0.0085534,0.0015037231,0.004452971,0.0037781456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029049674,0.00037142084,0.00094470993,0.001507259,0.029467424,0.007838118,0.0050440645,0.005745186,0.0007090029],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003378845,0.0000055411065,0.00009170583,0.000012687385,0.0000035633368,0.000012228586,0.00032717173,0.00049922353,0.000014924393,0.9969682,0.0005109724,0.0015503663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009144563,0.000009047684,0.00012450317,0.000045796216,0.0000032370533,0.00002264942,0.00023180027,0.0008110737,0.000107486485,0.9848262,0.01380175,0.0000072753037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027212997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023193317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019883417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005359202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064863977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10515475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270387197","doi":"","title":"The Role of Dissenting and Concurring Reasons in The Supreme Court of Canada's \"Charter\" Jurisprudence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Charter; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.008489126006916854,"score_gpt":0.24523691085189267,"score_spread":0.23674778484497583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270387197","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29337877,0.0041249646,0.009122294,0.17644955,0.0021410626,0.0002987905,0.00041399698,0.00008331203,0.51398724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9741812,0.00035709632,0.0017438259,0.010316127,0.00019482551,0.00007388433,0.000030253988,0.000044319502,0.013058478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94319886,0.01714466,0.0015335176,0.004810226,0.01762361,0.015689036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8724134,0.09919873,0.0034165073,0.0028365524,0.016398106,0.0057367403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04827767,0.000643662,0.0015032986,0.0047505964,0.039720148,0.028422214,0.005387886,0.019769711,0.0046002697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12912048,0.001163132,0.0009081777,0.0048159966,0.035092093,0.004965453,0.004374315,0.016400771,0.00037327147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006403041,0.000029153944,0.003278995,0.00003812493,0.000034105287,0.00025796064,0.023469256,0.0003335961,0.00020970391,0.9528285,0.013205922,0.006250562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004332293,0.00007341549,0.048484746,0.0010364086,0.00054449565,0.00028112318,0.078388646,0.007206413,0.0035062572,0.61753464,0.24192747,0.00058316835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8277406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9356264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17225939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0780552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19028547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5663328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270517322","doi":"","title":"How Harper Will Reshape Canada's Courts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Political science; Separation of powers; Bill of rights; Constitution; Legislature; Judicial activism; Judicial review; Judicial independence; Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Constitutional law","score_opus":0.018648557120387016,"score_gpt":0.23027211674365544,"score_spread":0.21162355962326843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270517322","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027740913,0.010797151,0.0030802398,0.5921898,0.0067468556,0.00012455392,0.00042572664,0.00047105245,0.35842374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40070012,0.0074371328,0.00480766,0.22378437,0.0014211586,0.00008911131,0.0002729327,0.00030905157,0.36117846],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9848162,0.0014196594,0.00018434106,0.0015246694,0.0051665865,0.0068885586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98609424,0.0012601437,0.00028316604,0.0006967708,0.007073597,0.004592133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007937983,0.00071189797,0.00050308206,0.0018579907,0.03977045,0.020838,0.0041021397,0.009500353,0.016516943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020113258,0.00077160564,0.0007119827,0.0019239775,0.015998784,0.00666805,0.0046446514,0.01164925,0.0030360117],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004405563,0.000040347524,0.0034163385,0.000052804575,0.000030857584,0.0005315418,0.00489136,0.00060764246,0.00036310765,0.4403161,0.50919497,0.040510796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003349385,0.000022270346,0.002581375,0.00017832399,0.000024811121,0.00008738456,0.004358574,0.0004999165,0.0002922017,0.021739129,0.9700739,0.00010872529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9899888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9954497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17641488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17641488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29013452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.955242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271424998","doi":"","title":"Political Law and the Supreme Court of Canada (La Cour suprême du Canada et le droit politique)","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Politics; Constitutional law; Democracy; Constitutional court; Adjudication; Judicial review; Constitution","score_opus":0.007120024892550952,"score_gpt":0.22242000413556318,"score_spread":0.21529997924301222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271424998","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06347309,0.04704353,0.0020158733,0.11375553,0.0008114012,0.0000329488,0.0005850733,0.000066977576,0.7722156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9052674,0.0082217045,0.0006443386,0.005742333,0.00024662667,0.000014067172,0.00010680987,0.000024056128,0.0797328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975333,0.00039915598,0.000032050626,0.0002144931,0.0008767804,0.0009441568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981232,0.0006278706,0.0001223032,0.000059599624,0.00076971244,0.00029723323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015781929,0.00022687933,0.00024199646,0.0015651375,0.014724815,0.010505233,0.00086537807,0.0028443458,0.006090232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046629463,0.0002001079,0.00017743543,0.003176401,0.012522187,0.0016392517,0.0013571377,0.0026816716,0.00034483097],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004549037,0.0000028033287,0.0004939562,0.000018739713,0.0000033682832,0.000064504726,0.00204641,0.00015661507,0.00006186675,0.97555155,0.016165635,0.0054299915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020558538,0.000014392512,0.013987909,0.00031603448,0.000029901717,0.00010553448,0.0061725667,0.0007573855,0.00026290622,0.19590741,0.7823661,0.000059263028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9845101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99051976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9164281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08357192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.086651884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60635954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271604228","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900003994","title":"Constitutions as Living Trees: An Idiot Defends","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Idiot; Law; Sociology; Tree of life (biology); Political science; Philosophy; Law and economics; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.03350669052369158,"score_gpt":0.3190390909449404,"score_spread":0.2855324004212488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271604228","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038621135,0.0046346453,0.18037239,0.059845243,0.0011543857,0.00013932175,0.00017225232,0.0002615349,0.71479905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92217,0.002307316,0.031878375,0.007101763,0.0010458436,0.00034529582,0.00011375315,0.00025760024,0.034780044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918142,0.00429665,0.00021734954,0.00096895284,0.001964081,0.00073872803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941373,0.0036908418,0.00050599716,0.00088897045,0.00054689334,0.00022994596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075731655,0.00042782634,0.0005358005,0.0026638997,0.0070970873,0.010785925,0.0016409314,0.0055957483,0.004430201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010819877,0.00039962222,0.00063679816,0.002005758,0.046371277,0.015946748,0.0048452783,0.007823066,0.0008295781],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.8919263e-7,8.630837e-7,0.000014968781,0.0000018553393,3.001456e-7,0.0000040988925,0.00063403277,0.000036942813,0.00000863822,0.99846494,0.00033239526,0.0005004384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009490676,0.00000709687,0.00008924169,0.000037297206,0.0000033546683,0.000031754196,0.0010217947,0.00051794166,0.00010229531,0.91653055,0.08164103,0.000008103759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006131126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066892416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9938689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004231439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042603016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04005122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271825541","doi":"","title":"Book Review of Alex M. Cameron, Power Without Law: The Supreme Court of Canada, the Marshall Decisions, and the Failure of Judicial Activism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Jurisdiction; Political science; Nova scotia; Economic Justice; Treaty; Constitution; Sociology","score_opus":0.007106713470599838,"score_gpt":0.25263304126228103,"score_spread":0.24552632779168118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271825541","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003743012,0.7089167,0.00040303718,0.07460299,0.031051915,0.00005438397,0.0005830427,0.000067274406,0.18394631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007861383,0.5666935,0.0005467227,0.06295683,0.026590388,0.000100443576,0.00077973196,0.0001905865,0.33428043],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842936,0.0001407396,0.000049095845,0.00017117335,0.0010832633,0.00012639046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996451,0.0010056773,0.00012227905,0.00009278044,0.0020393964,0.00028879163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078894896,0.0009672596,0.0011695788,0.003640021,0.0045488314,0.004578226,0.0015750335,0.0032296525,0.03287373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050394884,0.0005186136,0.00031855667,0.007069075,0.003794692,0.0032139672,0.0011949326,0.0047741774,0.011883944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015120478,0.000003691178,0.000020218555,0.00008621208,0.0000011121097,0.000012415811,0.00005654611,0.000034667093,0.00001684036,0.0040292,0.98679245,0.008945142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015867881,0.000001934842,0.00017304608,0.00033613734,0.0000013399513,0.00002972969,0.00005169412,0.000015226436,0.000007925109,0.00069929106,0.99867755,0.0000044967082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5206686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74115777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47933137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024200525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026111595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9643085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271865752","doi":"","title":"Dialogic Judicial Review and its Critics","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Charter; Legislature; Political science; Law; Legitimacy; Judicial activism; Constitutional theory; Politics; Normative; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03237620147723794,"score_gpt":0.3005861337771629,"score_spread":0.26820993229992496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271865752","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004532396,0.06882356,0.006969775,0.75568765,0.004334829,0.000086138585,0.00010922552,0.0001158275,0.15934059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58044386,0.043451957,0.0064309775,0.3027503,0.024223465,0.0004137413,0.00013025902,0.00026233945,0.04189311],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.89294153,0.04648666,0.0033850984,0.00840937,0.04309399,0.0056833774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80058,0.1474337,0.0043769535,0.007380487,0.03728843,0.0029404834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07504313,0.00050747837,0.0018062338,0.004977164,0.013326063,0.015983373,0.004498792,0.023246212,0.003874106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17893194,0.0007666682,0.0010754234,0.006078049,0.052118003,0.0085691,0.0053804396,0.024347419,0.00081997],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013103048,0.000007891768,0.00013579206,0.000119829994,0.0000089257255,0.00005049212,0.0017035964,0.00025463704,0.000018824301,0.93750024,0.048279133,0.011907536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000094577896,0.000019417777,0.0008295283,0.000914224,0.000035578196,0.0001731939,0.0013636053,0.0015139448,0.00017607675,0.49800858,0.4967954,0.0000759142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13707615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07989378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13707615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04352964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055455167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39687073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272172760","doi":"","title":"L’absurdité du critère scriptural pour qualifier la constitution (The Absurdity of the Scriptural Qualifier for a Constitution)","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Humanities; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03159265419223801,"score_gpt":0.29948979637269324,"score_spread":0.26789714218045524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272172760","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1104655,0.0030099042,0.19878262,0.017435107,0.0011691536,0.00013411016,0.00048074676,0.00045019254,0.66807276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9578885,0.0004760566,0.018697517,0.0008692501,0.0002262482,0.00010258174,0.00013515425,0.00017809492,0.021426696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946926,0.0032863207,0.00030443305,0.00056889036,0.0008270078,0.00032082284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955858,0.0017631263,0.000417925,0.00064230175,0.0013714358,0.00021944648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052420385,0.0005344796,0.00036133284,0.001322627,0.003522744,0.0063852826,0.0006612855,0.0013216698,0.0070007155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069200657,0.0002215059,0.00043850348,0.00079209026,0.014940234,0.0042603035,0.0015029287,0.0025240064,0.0011095142],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001343031,0.0000032377231,0.00036105228,0.00002490289,0.000004709818,0.00005437808,0.0046224147,0.000087162174,0.00061183225,0.9882047,0.0013576434,0.0046545407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044489178,0.00011270053,0.007453769,0.0003662546,0.000044372486,0.0008473516,0.013116779,0.002429992,0.0044204867,0.6040215,0.36701223,0.00013013695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020091508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020554194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020091508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004617348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028596558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03994912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272781916","doi":"","title":"The Globalization of the Canadian Constitution","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Charter; Globalization; Globe; Political science; Scholarship; Politics; Identity (music); Immigration; Law; Sociology; Political economy","score_opus":0.011997891921283433,"score_gpt":0.26438846176483477,"score_spread":0.25239056984355135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272781916","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04306693,0.011806353,0.001383421,0.07111523,0.0008841921,0.000026820513,0.00018416804,0.000050807404,0.87148213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9034448,0.009078613,0.001578359,0.008893498,0.00028524623,0.000029627372,0.00009878098,0.00007560155,0.076515414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99627954,0.00061508635,0.000052569572,0.00048052525,0.0013100973,0.0012621679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974481,0.0006430701,0.00010897273,0.00017830337,0.0011136216,0.00050801487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026102432,0.00035486033,0.00027129013,0.0021300926,0.02292528,0.0091360295,0.0007775475,0.0017540291,0.0070667155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00624999,0.00024329686,0.00028450167,0.0024716507,0.02482749,0.0026418236,0.0033012754,0.0035208578,0.0003218057],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006551549,0.0000028753716,0.00045589605,0.000017203958,0.0000021821936,0.0000565173,0.008307561,0.00013242695,0.0000689338,0.96697056,0.016200753,0.007778563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010231442,0.000009337465,0.0068963775,0.00017507939,0.000016942424,0.00007794355,0.012230097,0.00032424834,0.00019474993,0.062183004,0.9178297,0.000052440082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9856489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98901576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13903649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13903649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1404638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99859565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2273248466","doi":"","title":"Judicial Independence, Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rule of law; Principle of legality; Law; Sketch; Statute; Political science; Declaration of independence; Economic Justice; Transitional justice; Independence (probability theory); Law and economics; Sociology; Constitution; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.029010018821396345,"score_gpt":0.3284590800815982,"score_spread":0.2994490612602018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2273248466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08448509,0.008405249,0.027991802,0.04344018,0.00048202576,0.0000893138,0.00012250866,0.00008157203,0.8349023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98272866,0.00110657,0.001839517,0.0028035927,0.00028091742,0.000057365247,0.000033512522,0.000016907754,0.011133034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99222976,0.0025154743,0.0003291199,0.001288929,0.0017113055,0.0019255126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99287695,0.0037286377,0.0009021582,0.0010442503,0.00078529643,0.00066269946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007293264,0.00024547806,0.0006259108,0.0022026342,0.007952088,0.009793448,0.0017285773,0.0037560058,0.0049551562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013856604,0.00028606752,0.0006861881,0.0017692584,0.041989274,0.0061567873,0.0058239116,0.006876883,0.0005961944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022878382,0.0000049018854,0.00009612957,0.0000058043247,0.0000015399156,0.000019524152,0.0003976325,0.00006914873,0.000014053951,0.9978666,0.00043936764,0.0010830803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011961063,0.0000147484625,0.0006455762,0.00005759918,0.0000052882874,0.00003489631,0.00072987593,0.00024944634,0.00007563129,0.97667,0.021497022,0.000007881134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011356649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009516259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011356649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004936301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007813138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03857094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2273294975","doi":"","title":"Legal Theory in the Crucible of Constitutional Justice","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Morality; Politics; Economic Justice; Constitutional economics; Democracy; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013544522028994293,"score_gpt":0.28510855892884446,"score_spread":0.27156403689985015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2273294975","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02083289,0.020506943,0.044401962,0.14416347,0.0011452644,0.00005248578,0.00009916113,0.00008495608,0.7687128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94623435,0.006223216,0.00974221,0.0077407784,0.0014837999,0.00013452355,0.00007716452,0.00007740745,0.028286606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99342346,0.0039913864,0.00019284495,0.00059345365,0.0010156494,0.0007832389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914928,0.0064963987,0.0003575806,0.0006905821,0.0006412364,0.00032151575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008850487,0.0004137314,0.00068448577,0.002739833,0.006818754,0.012023631,0.0018341246,0.0063779145,0.00440261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012216439,0.00035482278,0.0006541945,0.002238181,0.07269861,0.013664463,0.0033442816,0.006595543,0.0006009449],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.438547e-7,0.0000011143998,0.0000119988445,0.0000033426813,4.5369833e-7,0.000005350297,0.00022539916,0.00006253029,0.0000033697434,0.99888366,0.00037790445,0.00042436534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026881396,0.0000018806155,0.000036656817,0.000025352863,8.0384655e-7,0.0000061101564,0.0002381812,0.00011581464,0.000009341708,0.98856926,0.010992228,0.0000016677324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009124016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007877862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012023631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010055282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007881799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07295656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274155596","doi":"","title":"Review of Sauvageau, Schneiderman, and Taras, The Last Word: Media Coverage of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Justice System Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.015418279786106137,"score_gpt":0.24550983402402304,"score_spread":0.2300915542379169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274155596","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00041619124,0.95064247,0.00008776212,0.03497714,0.0033478793,0.000014746495,0.0013005015,0.000010665646,0.009202595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011012356,0.9598657,0.00023600092,0.019006236,0.004922187,0.000029355038,0.00073944073,0.000026413149,0.0041622906],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958175,0.0005243393,0.00031782503,0.0003048811,0.0026369302,0.0003985458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9603828,0.013062686,0.0018417703,0.0005451991,0.022935295,0.001232224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005127432,0.00089981494,0.0019063171,0.022425467,0.003607205,0.0065378984,0.0026147806,0.0027336162,0.0098671755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028320432,0.00051534205,0.0006179196,0.029767742,0.003411195,0.0025392734,0.001795914,0.0029360612,0.0016999074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005205701,0.000019540375,0.0012941016,0.010196045,0.00017121756,0.000094839255,0.0009846292,0.00013609865,0.00012943447,0.011181677,0.8333314,0.14240892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008603498,0.000007058751,0.0060497453,0.01684362,0.00018990709,0.00006082706,0.0007165939,0.000028664737,0.00008629452,0.0008211246,0.9751633,0.000024338517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.826468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9138437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17353201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029744882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0822659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34910792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275434725","doi":"","title":"The Debate About Constitutional Dialogues in Canada: Unforeseen Implications?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial activism; Judicial review; Democracy; Political science; Government (linguistics); Affect (linguistics); Deliberative democracy; Law and economics; Law; Constitutional law; Public administration; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.01653969488856511,"score_gpt":0.2662626200544994,"score_spread":0.2497229251659343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2275434725","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05798103,0.018695308,0.0017224719,0.6822054,0.001336153,0.000054352808,0.00060884014,0.000112365866,0.23728405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8872763,0.009722248,0.0015981476,0.066615015,0.0005655784,0.000049116585,0.00015530684,0.0000930875,0.033925142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9810744,0.0029462615,0.00033201248,0.0016041307,0.00734564,0.0066976133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97475797,0.009597037,0.0010137927,0.0005255864,0.009409839,0.0046956744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011090063,0.00053613074,0.00097244105,0.004186653,0.05046506,0.025517717,0.0045115487,0.008656192,0.013129183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03203425,0.00049436215,0.0006620453,0.009407846,0.021946428,0.0073934607,0.005029788,0.013064316,0.0006066817],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008588127,0.0000445262,0.0034697368,0.00025453232,0.00004265666,0.00023332595,0.023055973,0.00073038595,0.00020885227,0.8338893,0.10191834,0.036066517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009840502,0.00003854382,0.018358788,0.000929425,0.00013074621,0.00014315415,0.0722633,0.0020006688,0.0008679538,0.12899621,0.775842,0.0003307797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99675214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29625803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.29625803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.39458117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8162409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275579968","doi":"","title":"THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA IN THE AGE OF RIGHTS: CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRACY, THE RULE OF LAW AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS UNDER CANADA'S CONSTITUTION","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Judicial independence; Political science; Democracy; Fundamental rights; Separation of powers; Constitution; Human rights; Charter; Bill of rights; Judicial review; Politics","score_opus":0.010576516891939997,"score_gpt":0.24161362290316923,"score_spread":0.23103710601122923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2275579968","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058883123,0.04590958,0.0043393197,0.255549,0.0022433857,0.00006988531,0.000476156,0.00009257321,0.63243705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87009287,0.013665974,0.0017335828,0.029561182,0.00052879314,0.00004085173,0.00014279204,0.00006144965,0.08417263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930385,0.0010602453,0.000113185735,0.0006308302,0.0025011178,0.0026561453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99597377,0.0014165409,0.00016525897,0.00013939472,0.0015110727,0.0007939984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032386342,0.00031165432,0.00043384053,0.0014155147,0.032674458,0.018949712,0.0020960215,0.0071252296,0.004420088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010699016,0.00048567427,0.00028062324,0.0029158653,0.026032731,0.004852409,0.002862172,0.008843994,0.00032923458],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000949172,0.0000046028795,0.00065161154,0.000020991694,0.000004419481,0.00018160138,0.004912404,0.00020957239,0.00008914857,0.9618828,0.024824629,0.0072087185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003215806,0.00001248434,0.0063571874,0.00048159703,0.000042496435,0.00012633255,0.01472283,0.0009518223,0.00045253985,0.2052875,0.77141863,0.000114464296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9910116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9957396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8422115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1577885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23588477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.976846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W22768864","doi":"","title":"Parliamentary Privilege, Rule of Law and the Charter after the Vaid Case","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Privilege (computing); Political science; Common law; Legislature; Subject (documents); Rule of law; Supreme court; Public law; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.008280787281311298,"score_gpt":0.25913501508932796,"score_spread":0.25085422780801664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W22768864","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1281814,0.0048721484,0.005312337,0.16010977,0.0041791503,0.00009210962,0.00037173778,0.00008649459,0.69679487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92019105,0.00056518294,0.0010323632,0.022106912,0.0013049116,0.00007196354,0.00006910128,0.00004524932,0.054613203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98677176,0.0039260383,0.00065998395,0.0018691004,0.0029649625,0.0038081876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98583543,0.009322488,0.0011039751,0.0012133691,0.0013272209,0.0011973644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015227914,0.0002937924,0.0009055716,0.0012231487,0.01174641,0.00949836,0.0016200907,0.0134739345,0.010189876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039504714,0.0004979078,0.00061629986,0.0010530138,0.0145114735,0.0047391145,0.0044878586,0.012929396,0.0014726403],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036078578,0.000031599837,0.0010908496,0.00001335669,0.000007398111,0.0002542725,0.0014218116,0.000092592745,0.00013250895,0.9753024,0.01778706,0.0038300697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011385466,0.00013776099,0.008864812,0.000364862,0.000051136776,0.0007903691,0.0037693204,0.00097059476,0.0011931913,0.56156343,0.42204455,0.00013606464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026257759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040773846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026257759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005577301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0091744065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08053386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278768245","doi":"","title":"Canadian Charter Equality at 20: Reflections from a Card-Carrying Member of the Court Party","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Redress; Democracy; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.034584069172632084,"score_gpt":0.30374695575761756,"score_spread":0.2691628865849855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278768245","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03059204,0.0076719043,0.0005053076,0.808999,0.0041751633,0.000063172934,0.00025775036,0.000038965285,0.14769664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46832895,0.006539477,0.00091576314,0.35321364,0.0014904916,0.00007506876,0.00015971094,0.00014596799,0.16913092],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98518777,0.0021876986,0.00019377,0.001131964,0.0049774465,0.006321297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855598,0.0042189225,0.00031336912,0.00031810853,0.005486057,0.0041036815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010789136,0.00058639026,0.00075374136,0.0014465951,0.09902305,0.017401109,0.004002429,0.019120893,0.010159496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025561413,0.0007965538,0.0006736459,0.0032076645,0.018564131,0.0045602983,0.004577096,0.029067574,0.00089087634],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059977432,0.000072937655,0.0018954049,0.00006599657,0.000015340192,0.0011189124,0.058780678,0.00025595777,0.0002952325,0.18097304,0.73691666,0.019549996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027712593,0.000023339593,0.004568864,0.00016959662,0.000022156355,0.00013304518,0.06866057,0.00022684992,0.00033292922,0.008329194,0.91737175,0.00013410325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99151117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16160789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16160789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24264288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.972416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2281574189","doi":"","title":"The Last Word: Media Coverage of the Supreme Court of Canada (Florian Sauvageau David Schneiderman David Taras)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Philosophy; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.02516552826368531,"score_gpt":0.27815466520139986,"score_spread":0.2529891369377146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2281574189","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056514028,0.18998918,0.00023865652,0.6531387,0.023550471,0.000035525125,0.0020707776,0.0001142644,0.12521094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19370775,0.1268383,0.00070993905,0.2734332,0.037257846,0.00009842199,0.0013450804,0.00037158915,0.36623788],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965383,0.00023611855,0.00009169566,0.0003027653,0.0022171696,0.00061387644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899463,0.0024781695,0.00042339994,0.00019343111,0.005968528,0.0009902006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018141778,0.0006825673,0.0008785797,0.006589307,0.015715167,0.010581591,0.0021092743,0.0074822805,0.022914242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013660164,0.00054305175,0.0004267144,0.008476266,0.004975712,0.0026316552,0.0018292094,0.00506172,0.0024042935],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007930831,0.0000052458754,0.00052509207,0.00010202544,0.000009195426,0.00006246351,0.0008024746,0.00004416596,0.00005496207,0.009053473,0.978007,0.011326003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007369815,0.0000043002597,0.007194355,0.0007241693,0.00002800906,0.00004925091,0.00190028,0.000079428624,0.000104709696,0.0014631874,0.9884121,0.00003277931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97589636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9893555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04378831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04378831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.066200584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31770796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282150466","doi":"","title":"Review of Barbara Babcock's, Woman Lawyer: The Trials of Clara Foltz","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Biography; Scholarship; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Law; Media studies; Political science; History","score_opus":0.028981118268730253,"score_gpt":0.33553574054792473,"score_spread":0.3065546222791945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282150466","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016683535,0.9679424,0.000027863445,0.022631671,0.0061177583,0.000007067081,0.000017317545,0.0000042223296,0.0030848864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00427943,0.9530042,0.00008128993,0.030717893,0.007824375,0.000037293416,0.00004545502,0.000017426992,0.003992641],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972242,0.00093250046,0.00025963594,0.00028645498,0.0011302707,0.00016694292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9845915,0.008483153,0.0009968255,0.00027238508,0.0048435256,0.0008127163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036588362,0.000491326,0.0014053516,0.004272896,0.0024365971,0.0049027484,0.0013435808,0.0043601957,0.005173014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022300841,0.000504993,0.00031581,0.0055066594,0.0029931022,0.0037112846,0.0016191332,0.0047718086,0.0023326878],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002636668,0.000020750187,0.00014083562,0.005881102,0.000033139866,0.00013841609,0.0014195598,0.000041427164,0.000111743204,0.0075848005,0.8859712,0.09863081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005291398,0.000014671228,0.0005137729,0.009122288,0.000016558744,0.00014752161,0.00056491443,0.0000070102105,0.000028379605,0.00035318366,0.98921657,0.00000972261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017867254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04238903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017867254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005292287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010976848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038398385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282380463","doi":"10.1515/9780791485842-005","title":"Constitutional Rights Jurisprudence in Canada and the United States: Significant Convergence or Enduring Divergence?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"SUNY Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Divergence (linguistics); Jurisprudence; Convergence (economics); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.045946153916156265,"score_gpt":0.2583473403866452,"score_spread":0.21240118647048895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282380463","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043187857,0.055721458,0.001533283,0.08086884,0.00076677784,0.00003648657,0.00028462,0.000052813957,0.8175479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8439751,0.025093421,0.001798953,0.009831951,0.00034255034,0.000047981277,0.00024078359,0.00009105446,0.11857817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99275255,0.0009600147,0.000101710735,0.00041178512,0.0034349924,0.002339031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99621373,0.0013221198,0.00013112414,0.00013894752,0.0015657453,0.00062840467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033133498,0.0003601424,0.00069224637,0.0036118047,0.022673853,0.016727565,0.0017972669,0.0037285644,0.0037358815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008978383,0.00037201442,0.00032246448,0.009154723,0.037203766,0.0037767102,0.0031205036,0.0066911806,0.00027944663],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061533237,0.000008017056,0.00039251935,0.00002074156,0.0000045107727,0.00006229376,0.008992264,0.00016768258,0.00004844157,0.95845115,0.017188152,0.014658127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003095588,0.000015295509,0.014720666,0.0006182627,0.00002936669,0.00009728061,0.026669241,0.000810932,0.0003482482,0.31585187,0.640727,0.00008087706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9852121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9936885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1642413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1642413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28679383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9693616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282628998","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1470709","title":"One Step Forward, One Step Back: Measuring Activism in the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ontario Institute of Technology; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Two step; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.041158884746170424,"score_gpt":0.24272818395330076,"score_spread":0.20156929920713035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282628998","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93562084,0.0015476918,0.0006151468,0.006808649,0.0000642249,0.000100865975,0.001848292,0.000017314473,0.053376883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99298954,0.00033979557,0.00044249892,0.000432756,0.00001558007,0.000030151237,0.00046089618,0.000008847523,0.005279874],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99491197,0.00073756644,0.00012275975,0.00046079734,0.0024354616,0.0013314502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98860246,0.0021799847,0.0010444524,0.00023029969,0.005347321,0.0025953902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002757907,0.00032201502,0.00043337466,0.004347419,0.010531879,0.0059191585,0.002068157,0.0015865458,0.0034718204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015894044,0.00023703607,0.00028495258,0.008604937,0.0031483115,0.001540683,0.0018159603,0.002845129,0.00032892247],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016492217,0.00023023278,0.84968543,0.00017098372,0.00029918508,0.00020280125,0.03376258,0.0020208932,0.0007676585,0.03097533,0.024650319,0.057069603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016751523,0.00004242221,0.94222885,0.00016700168,0.00008161202,0.00002932686,0.032645278,0.0015772448,0.0004631659,0.001815382,0.020884825,0.000048201953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99529546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07499137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07499137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08568251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.544103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282645793","doi":"","title":"Does Constitutional Change Matter? Canada's Recognition of Aboriginal Title","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DigitalCommons - WayneState (Wayne State University)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitution; Law; Political science; Doctrine; Constitutional law; Constitutional right; Politics","score_opus":0.023970523885872074,"score_gpt":0.2379021798389892,"score_spread":0.21393165595311714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282645793","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40822232,0.009476539,0.0010829004,0.14594412,0.00047479584,0.00006960253,0.0004514614,0.00006872377,0.43420956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817012,0.0015767309,0.0002357459,0.0051757297,0.00006590702,0.000009918317,0.000052955766,0.000013949039,0.011167866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98524946,0.0014140414,0.0003468906,0.0014177182,0.0064285337,0.005143388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833515,0.0055208327,0.0016067405,0.0008901976,0.006538091,0.0020925861],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076777637,0.000118481286,0.0003887135,0.002217072,0.022263916,0.011446815,0.002175024,0.0031060923,0.0059676045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032470558,0.00025357428,0.00026537853,0.0041202474,0.024038523,0.0032419302,0.0028183695,0.004941839,0.00028385007],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005544008,0.000038855746,0.032129616,0.0001623179,0.000036937323,0.0009133562,0.06180737,0.00086097606,0.0012895203,0.8247718,0.02327048,0.054663364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005172879,0.00006629047,0.24468452,0.0007768949,0.0001191566,0.0004732809,0.09658271,0.0012076698,0.0020811218,0.055967994,0.597752,0.00023661258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98658156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99122906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13275993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13275993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1869005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9632452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2284045438","doi":"10.1080/0098261x.2009.10767931","title":"Review of Songer, The Transformation of the Supreme Court of Canada: An Empirical Examination","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Justice System Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Empirical examination; Political science; Law; Transformation (genetics); Economics; Actuarial science","score_opus":0.04209413976392959,"score_gpt":0.3052237155141118,"score_spread":0.26312957575018225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2284045438","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024139017,0.90254974,0.00013613713,0.07887118,0.0019696404,0.000037361344,0.0011794238,0.0000072698713,0.012835373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.059699416,0.8743737,0.00050983834,0.05510092,0.0034311076,0.0000718218,0.0007350387,0.000036623143,0.006041618],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99476504,0.00075610226,0.00037322598,0.00043722554,0.0030767457,0.00059172214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9576884,0.01539573,0.0017147249,0.0005704442,0.023417331,0.001213325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008055082,0.0005310696,0.0014279399,0.012450784,0.0059407847,0.006631428,0.0030210228,0.00400108,0.0053801485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04430353,0.00045215935,0.00057842466,0.022046488,0.0050065177,0.002767522,0.001424275,0.0027978974,0.0007017135],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082292914,0.000033050932,0.0035149334,0.008743948,0.0002274808,0.00015870211,0.002389538,0.00028513838,0.00017367647,0.0387002,0.8404063,0.10528467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038714366,0.000020463453,0.03248644,0.022429023,0.00043411786,0.0000960815,0.0034004003,0.00009256976,0.00018123417,0.0041497797,0.9366115,0.000059614522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91506875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9666336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.084931254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.055612765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15732704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40350074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2284485176","doi":"","title":"Arguing for Principles in Different Legal Cultures","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Political science; Legal certainty; Economic Justice; Legal realism; Law and economics; Legal culture; Certainty; Sociology; Legal research; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04111822668045917,"score_gpt":0.28379124859116606,"score_spread":0.2426730219107069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2284485176","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15927592,0.010567599,0.08890573,0.097185664,0.0018603337,0.00022563997,0.00012594486,0.00012207216,0.6417311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9626064,0.0011899569,0.016958116,0.010039224,0.00042706655,0.00023423643,0.000056766312,0.000076063785,0.008412074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9798639,0.0108607905,0.0009925932,0.002993517,0.003251678,0.0020373801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98789483,0.005731395,0.0015242416,0.0021823824,0.0017090472,0.00095820054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020650549,0.00064327964,0.0011390992,0.0022666557,0.0116349505,0.016371712,0.002185491,0.007747098,0.0034133224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023904644,0.0006389371,0.0012607726,0.0018078852,0.062816896,0.017693128,0.011926339,0.014731512,0.0006268958],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045876914,0.000005880929,0.0001953566,0.000015893007,0.000006848671,0.000033329616,0.0074279085,0.00005213636,0.00004043004,0.99003243,0.00039134454,0.0017938499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020637628,0.000014597694,0.0006352392,0.0001655143,0.000014371076,0.000073179166,0.00832926,0.00022601364,0.00014509595,0.96738493,0.022972101,0.00001894534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004895616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003663183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020650549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067563783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050429995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10921186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2284616397","doi":"","title":"Book Review - Courts and Federalism: Judicial Doctrine in the United States, Australia, and Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Berkley Law Scholarship Repository (University of California, Berkeley)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Judicial review; Law; Doctrine; Politics","score_opus":0.019187953659383302,"score_gpt":0.2548938742137268,"score_spread":0.23570592055434347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2284616397","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00082355377,0.8358894,0.0003374045,0.04803111,0.022156563,0.000069087015,0.00071621494,0.000052272757,0.09192444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014228173,0.83869725,0.00057655864,0.019576503,0.014509875,0.00010542024,0.00081567786,0.00008228125,0.11140826],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980647,0.00027071845,0.00008032609,0.00012276707,0.001274253,0.00018722349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887108,0.0026954038,0.00039009543,0.00013152751,0.007647935,0.0004241895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013687472,0.000887948,0.0014831525,0.0074812965,0.003549742,0.006297331,0.001625898,0.0033887622,0.016957555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009211846,0.0005208456,0.0005157544,0.023427486,0.0027848724,0.002239209,0.0008296252,0.0033761538,0.003549204],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004347188,0.0000071690924,0.00021434363,0.0004020308,0.0000092888085,0.000019499605,0.0001249856,0.00018400028,0.000020665711,0.00755668,0.96890825,0.022548676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049878786,0.0000063452203,0.002077827,0.0022413414,0.000032215143,0.000039736944,0.0003435447,0.0000863012,0.000025499765,0.0030422152,0.9920846,0.000015419952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.74210656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91376233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25789344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026083952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06301784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51882446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2285482189","doi":"","title":"Courts as Facilitators of Intergovernmental Dialogue: Cooperative Federalism and Judicial Review","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Federalism; Supreme court; Political science; Facilitator; Scrutiny; Law; Skepticism; Incrementalism; Politics; Judicial review; Law and economics; Constitution; Sociology","score_opus":0.010702657601952374,"score_gpt":0.2813735875963997,"score_spread":0.2706709299944473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2285482189","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09476926,0.045656066,0.018587591,0.32598448,0.0008826682,0.00019378445,0.00008913085,0.00013343833,0.5137036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97191906,0.0050588804,0.001511018,0.008581863,0.00030483448,0.000045599252,0.000014275121,0.000020254045,0.012544294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.978953,0.0114480825,0.00030194758,0.0011257855,0.0038444533,0.0043268106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9782446,0.01322015,0.0018687686,0.00083356246,0.0039371513,0.0018957262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017702794,0.00031730422,0.00052425195,0.0022703381,0.011941019,0.0161363,0.0020395129,0.0068314895,0.0028106396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02705341,0.00039317223,0.0003231418,0.002498277,0.023780819,0.0065285526,0.004063241,0.005922669,0.00031587327],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008346258,0.000006236636,0.0005826658,0.0000314668,0.0000060527154,0.00013588091,0.0032132063,0.00035480122,0.00008097494,0.98599017,0.004590946,0.0049992995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007126049,0.00003143235,0.005409736,0.00072130637,0.000069152265,0.00014141948,0.011882033,0.0031177904,0.000583319,0.66715264,0.31074387,0.000076162585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5106566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6375618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5106566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06165963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08730025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9844505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286247134","doi":"10.1080/0098261x.2009.10767937","title":"Judge Gender and the Voting Behavior of Justices on Two North American Supreme Courts","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Justice System Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Political science; Diversification (marketing strategy); Politics; Law; Business","score_opus":0.03763796565981158,"score_gpt":0.32137834353543,"score_spread":0.2837403778756184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286247134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99679846,0.00004507466,0.000022813272,0.00015408192,0.0000063177977,0.000003387364,0.0000432186,8.067023e-7,0.0029258747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99831283,0.000043763917,0.00003392295,0.000039214086,0.0000063088078,0.0000022131915,0.000051637853,0.0000014152407,0.0015086555],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917346,0.00023997326,0.000030524865,0.00011324665,0.00021919273,0.00022364745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954745,0.0013157949,0.0009993349,0.00012692908,0.0010527332,0.0010307365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016041374,0.00011993067,0.00025506064,0.0008788204,0.0018756114,0.00096316414,0.0003013116,0.00046186466,0.0040933206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008358458,0.00012707587,0.00016400646,0.0006911475,0.0007486798,0.00040382383,0.00045042354,0.0006630749,0.00041402143],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032606957,0.00018432438,0.9706566,0.000012206317,0.00004254653,0.0002839154,0.012865365,0.00012606902,0.0010924614,0.0011803344,0.0018605924,0.01136948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007891067,0.000056705638,0.9883503,0.00000940677,0.00001007303,0.00006696331,0.009365908,0.00023370351,0.00017018124,0.00024136619,0.0014777717,0.0000096868425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14733459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47834936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14733459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002045759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010195957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29295397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286799159","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1354","title":"Book Notes: Constitutional Deliberation in Congress: The Impact of Judicial Review in a Separated System, by J. Mitchell Pickerill","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Law; Political science; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0486927997995617,"score_gpt":0.38583541087384826,"score_spread":0.33714261107428656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286799159","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00034001697,0.7900858,0.0011927651,0.1424963,0.009802178,0.000033160573,0.00027074903,0.00004712259,0.05573189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011145119,0.7965739,0.0023060255,0.07115618,0.01708477,0.00012980384,0.00031239036,0.00007087942,0.10122091],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987233,0.0004189455,0.000058571193,0.00009672805,0.00064968975,0.00005267109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99305516,0.0049799173,0.00027828637,0.00012775337,0.0014334981,0.00012539439],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001969235,0.00054146734,0.00063472165,0.0023127813,0.0012346902,0.003414145,0.0011367481,0.0026224782,0.017025817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0100037195,0.0004153989,0.00043128768,0.004809839,0.002446542,0.003524378,0.00081071985,0.003213361,0.006551764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011634542,0.000011825889,0.00009495796,0.0003922607,0.000008469671,0.000025192618,0.000084265,0.00009998818,0.000040375995,0.023733178,0.9204846,0.05501329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016934551,0.00002052339,0.0009315923,0.0012098805,0.000016577133,0.00010392257,0.00013201043,0.000050095907,0.00009293233,0.020032939,0.9773793,0.000013288178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022259597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.074336514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022259597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022931024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005119363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056957066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286807462","doi":"","title":"Speakers at the 31st Annual Canada-United States Law Institute Conference on Understanding Each Other Across the Largest Undefended Border in History","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada-United States law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers; U.S. Department of State; Wayne State University; U.S. Department of Commerce","keywords":"Law; Political science; History; Geography","score_opus":0.05679768139076642,"score_gpt":0.2951788172311577,"score_spread":0.23838113584039128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286807462","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012685851,0.017213069,0.0014373962,0.54293096,0.16873586,0.0005482861,0.0016682183,0.00024948013,0.2545308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.059134297,0.009087636,0.0009310075,0.054069582,0.019196412,0.00032984867,0.0007710106,0.00028674738,0.8561934],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841547,0.00011666581,0.000032687843,0.000122159,0.00067922805,0.000633707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99652076,0.0003724885,0.00006976314,0.000052032483,0.0012881313,0.0016969251],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002979875,0.00092189596,0.0007585331,0.0029983332,0.020325368,0.008902716,0.0014681338,0.005605843,0.038845893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004249213,0.00052883866,0.0007484647,0.002426831,0.0035594278,0.003051185,0.0038343736,0.0075239963,0.0040800907],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027176578,0.000020923388,0.00037809522,0.000030810785,0.0000031204443,0.00008784553,0.0014936618,0.000044330227,0.00017182024,0.006331816,0.9821801,0.00923034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008494913,0.000004884168,0.0015244725,0.00009001596,0.0000048676134,0.00001742669,0.004823113,0.000057193618,0.00010450741,0.0013495933,0.992,0.000015519203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.53005964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88929373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46994036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024091933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038195018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94541585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2287521374","doi":"","title":"Chief Justice Lamer and Policy Design at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Charter; Political science; Economic Justice; Majority opinion; Original jurisdiction; Court of record; Certiorari; Legislature; Court of equity; Judicial review; Judicial independence","score_opus":0.014318349460657185,"score_gpt":0.26833152593110854,"score_spread":0.25401317647045135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2287521374","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038897652,0.02569232,0.0029277618,0.6110908,0.004428958,0.00024064432,0.0005180987,0.00022251018,0.31598133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62795305,0.013563444,0.0044612396,0.12742585,0.001638281,0.00015900236,0.00021583815,0.00020670645,0.22437665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9758011,0.0028313799,0.0003840719,0.0024712214,0.010375239,0.008136899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9810214,0.003800636,0.000558617,0.0004938491,0.00886639,0.0052589644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010011387,0.00055861194,0.00069207355,0.0025466778,0.048823982,0.021397077,0.00403649,0.011243898,0.009936531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02422947,0.0010922118,0.0005234947,0.003427722,0.014849928,0.0030538056,0.0030267427,0.009408144,0.000763369],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005056655,0.000049164653,0.0041081333,0.00012582011,0.000050030314,0.0006773899,0.0063204244,0.0018624583,0.0007169113,0.57146233,0.38526052,0.029316159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003791892,0.000037194048,0.008702886,0.00035927948,0.00006414223,0.00009937604,0.0067289085,0.0014782909,0.00067086285,0.03187927,0.94975084,0.00019093625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9891773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9948754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7144208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2855792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.43690172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8286269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2290184632","doi":"","title":"Comparative Reflections on Miscarriages of Justice in Australia and Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Appeal; Legislature; Law; Parliament; Accountability; Scholarship; Supreme court; Law reform; Economic Justice; Politics","score_opus":0.10092746840050328,"score_gpt":0.3890951011790911,"score_spread":0.2881676327785878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2290184632","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5869737,0.019505305,0.0011935754,0.08901678,0.000819273,0.00007218047,0.00017104312,0.000033631793,0.30221453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97339565,0.0044882195,0.00022850125,0.0042850627,0.00007548276,0.000024122379,0.000027016993,0.000022282975,0.017453544],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863885,0.0030438511,0.00031339555,0.000837198,0.0047521,0.004664973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98133713,0.0075872536,0.0013210705,0.00053416553,0.0063598035,0.0028606043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008001885,0.00026979073,0.0008135093,0.0048644273,0.04480461,0.010248017,0.0030372143,0.0039237514,0.006327447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030463848,0.0005346161,0.00043766116,0.007456813,0.02016959,0.0034440872,0.008426708,0.008295877,0.00023510108],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006653319,0.000049734204,0.010864955,0.00014642139,0.000029146948,0.001662556,0.55603087,0.0002823454,0.00034872038,0.3831026,0.012676062,0.03474008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015724981,0.00006655694,0.06462191,0.00077621546,0.0000583179,0.00072295853,0.568233,0.00057681266,0.00045504197,0.02034353,0.3439439,0.00018600251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97840697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98920363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14560759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14560759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14167264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99097407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2291194703","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2955805","title":"Rights Without Remedies: The Court Party Theory and the Demise of the Court Challenges Program","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Demise; Law; Political science; Remand (court procedure); Supreme court; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02589510658717841,"score_gpt":0.2786480956751828,"score_spread":0.25275298908800437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2291194703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07046664,0.0011650644,0.018387843,0.069404244,0.00041294028,0.00007154111,0.00012184126,0.00004038289,0.8399295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96670693,0.00026914882,0.0012693149,0.0030256398,0.00036945302,0.00007701248,0.000020911324,0.000045225053,0.028216347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928617,0.003030694,0.00016622069,0.0011353993,0.0014129755,0.0013931112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887341,0.0074411426,0.00064135704,0.0018143342,0.0007516574,0.0006174468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00838929,0.00029103248,0.00068858376,0.0013610143,0.00781577,0.009550586,0.0021483982,0.009789634,0.021361435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027539326,0.00036470164,0.0007691258,0.0011888965,0.02330041,0.01252976,0.005858816,0.011314913,0.0009991013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005568136,0.0000059661206,0.000056543522,0.000002559698,0.000001542113,0.000015465188,0.00028368534,0.000092555245,0.000016819866,0.99736816,0.0008941897,0.0012569668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015747544,0.0000065543945,0.00025757763,0.000015080909,0.0000058934247,0.00001763507,0.00038914694,0.00054531475,0.000079889316,0.98714626,0.011514814,0.0000060126663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072108908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069955033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021361435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040780646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006278402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07146114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2291523871","doi":"","title":"“[This] I Know from My Grandfather”: The Battle for Admissibility of Indigenous Oral History as Proof of Tribal Land Claims","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Oklahoma College of Law - Digital Commons (University of Oklahoma)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Indigenous; Tribe; Law; Colonialism; Harm; Oral history; Doctrine; Political science; Battle; Legislative history; Legal history; Face (sociological concept); History; Sociology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02579578059511789,"score_gpt":0.21918027745900043,"score_spread":0.19338449686388254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2291523871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12807414,0.0074667274,0.003983601,0.27107802,0.0008236728,0.00005743156,0.00006805483,0.00004637653,0.5884019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9539632,0.0012680507,0.00085463654,0.01686734,0.00017406151,0.000019714922,0.000012155188,0.000018459656,0.026822282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99318886,0.003425895,0.00014484474,0.00050170015,0.0013730606,0.0013657549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99140406,0.0051671998,0.00035968047,0.00048166196,0.0018261265,0.00076130626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009866192,0.00020449696,0.0002857472,0.00094522495,0.033985198,0.010175952,0.001658403,0.004673054,0.0040697935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018766092,0.0003052616,0.0001876281,0.0007274616,0.04834348,0.005234274,0.0039149555,0.009894886,0.0004267085],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010906843,0.000011615037,0.0009833125,0.000033869044,0.0000053957274,0.00053732574,0.08872802,0.00006384093,0.00021705242,0.8722977,0.025286604,0.011824402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000237165,0.00004511559,0.0061503635,0.00072361535,0.000039264076,0.0009231719,0.23028232,0.0005120549,0.001326212,0.19053148,0.5693435,0.00009925208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5121371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6768905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5121371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01797768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03448132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.981472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2292053411","doi":"","title":"The Value of Dissent in Constitutional Adjudication: A Context-Specific Analysis","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Adjudication; Dissent; Political science; Law; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Credibility; Context (archaeology); Value (mathematics); History; Politics","score_opus":0.011178001653048665,"score_gpt":0.27290950990678997,"score_spread":0.2617315082537413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2292053411","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5816818,0.0058890274,0.070107624,0.023226302,0.00030138163,0.00033187473,0.00021208981,0.000039736686,0.3182102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99584717,0.00034041808,0.0030104485,0.00029342907,0.00006139344,0.000036813883,0.000009439821,0.000008288644,0.00039272863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.91965336,0.06359499,0.002165169,0.0022153815,0.00922538,0.0031457206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7337508,0.23782882,0.009358769,0.0069907294,0.010538993,0.0015319127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043620296,0.0003372054,0.00076933106,0.004821162,0.008309328,0.008250276,0.0014653179,0.0024886855,0.0021707253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12919512,0.00034398257,0.00068687444,0.0049102306,0.028361563,0.007803692,0.0069288732,0.0040854146,0.00015546147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016719115,0.00006423848,0.022561392,0.0003126713,0.00008211323,0.0009793522,0.06202095,0.0022107447,0.0006101977,0.8831168,0.00083191245,0.027042408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000097671065,0.0002637602,0.053776965,0.0017555553,0.00042419985,0.0016009823,0.14298502,0.010475099,0.0038247467,0.7266908,0.05785624,0.00024894104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009105502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019454733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043620296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008154663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056985943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23068899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2292430605","doi":"","title":"Feminist Constitutionalism: Global Perspectives","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Feminism; Constitution; Sociology; Interpretation (philosophy); Mainstream; Reproductive justice; Law; Institution; Gender studies; Political science; Politics; Abortion; Philosophy; Democracy","score_opus":0.026145540147753093,"score_gpt":0.2932565901767571,"score_spread":0.267111050029004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2292430605","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004120649,0.19855422,0.0061024358,0.29435977,0.0027642548,0.000032455937,0.0001700456,0.000056814923,0.4938394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5532164,0.23171204,0.0067951507,0.068563774,0.016887149,0.00029314944,0.00036489475,0.00037379388,0.121793635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944424,0.0030944422,0.000112454894,0.0007467327,0.0009071107,0.0006968304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996881,0.0022983295,0.00016188844,0.0002420701,0.00020839566,0.00020834061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00630354,0.00087473687,0.00093902816,0.002927336,0.004997239,0.011467478,0.0014475184,0.006015359,0.013065975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004391571,0.00044793542,0.0005832866,0.0047840704,0.033317108,0.010922466,0.0059818067,0.010058625,0.0010554529],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002397729,0.000008340707,0.00006381331,0.00006104371,0.0000025480351,0.000024412653,0.0016273661,0.00017770893,0.000025604917,0.9790754,0.010897829,0.008033613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004369527,0.000009243869,0.0003296272,0.0004997215,0.0000033702258,0.000053136384,0.0025319473,0.00014646053,0.000061904146,0.46039358,0.5359581,0.000008625055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006172527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065465397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013065975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011748552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047399714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08524209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2294498286","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Janet Hiebert, 'Charter Conflicts: What is Parliament's Role?'","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Charter; Political science; Articulation (sociology); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.009259596247797762,"score_gpt":0.2690828363888658,"score_spread":0.25982324014106806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2294498286","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013075529,0.63849753,0.00018165019,0.2576295,0.0889315,0.000079319936,0.00046533634,0.000063294094,0.014021157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020925505,0.5945393,0.00033285187,0.23895319,0.06105325,0.00020077202,0.0008876371,0.00009474487,0.10184571],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983051,0.00029275875,0.00012143502,0.00024034485,0.0009350972,0.0001053827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99085957,0.0046978397,0.0006609541,0.00014159997,0.0031055785,0.0005344406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020866701,0.0012229146,0.002661395,0.0041318173,0.0012751654,0.0036649131,0.00397263,0.005995895,0.03064942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014744128,0.0007679434,0.0007208274,0.008759259,0.0020154468,0.0040876097,0.0014785968,0.0071870005,0.022179632],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005167995,0.000002584245,0.000016495953,0.0003906935,0.0000033928275,0.00001330652,0.000024993808,0.000009892207,0.000008949427,0.00025810878,0.991647,0.0076193707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014347339,0.000008720244,0.00038437475,0.0015517273,0.000015589016,0.00013039348,0.00008025438,0.000016025699,0.000020638918,0.0004707783,0.9972963,0.000010914401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018157296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053567927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03064942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004538895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064270273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.102532566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W229476001","doi":"","title":"When Courts Decide Elections","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Order (exchange); Law; General election; Law and economics; Election law; Federal election; Public administration; Voting; Economics; Politics; Finance","score_opus":0.04603129071830239,"score_gpt":0.31117348495902536,"score_spread":0.26514219424072294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W229476001","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056433924,0.007783717,0.0038416174,0.17128478,0.008221052,0.0003834818,0.00078084716,0.0001748681,0.7510957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7933744,0.004227445,0.0028830185,0.076473445,0.004326982,0.0003821295,0.00047814343,0.0003705673,0.11748368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9259593,0.018191595,0.0033848817,0.006809806,0.02411634,0.021538045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9180555,0.04211387,0.0039002914,0.003690597,0.024409607,0.007830274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03626756,0.0003046644,0.0013339802,0.004000869,0.0210649,0.034026675,0.0035784182,0.017761571,0.020925578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18634483,0.0014944162,0.000924545,0.0040456885,0.013202703,0.012024253,0.006157554,0.017438686,0.0046932707],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009936705,0.000038136954,0.0037838893,0.00009721537,0.00003614855,0.0007585105,0.010984988,0.00021802422,0.0003080829,0.75861764,0.19953218,0.0255258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016477391,0.00004478231,0.009013303,0.00073763804,0.00005978083,0.00014920362,0.02241987,0.0004604552,0.0010154607,0.22312175,0.7425952,0.0002178283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2506875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4414345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7493125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036726207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054596767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49845672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2294776267","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139976800.005","title":"Norms versus operations: the Party Constitutionin political configuration","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.08222645834012722,"score_gpt":0.2768046995629202,"score_spread":0.194578241222793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2294776267","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015821127,0.011242465,0.0092128785,0.016500274,0.00037546514,0.000017901195,0.00006037512,0.000051602587,0.9467178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9094253,0.0056070075,0.0024567877,0.0012249955,0.00065379863,0.00007789571,0.00009821487,0.000097936514,0.08035801],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99685305,0.002007614,0.00005178978,0.00021845628,0.0006021374,0.00026694473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986577,0.0008219313,0.00012428421,0.0001986202,0.00010978876,0.000087647844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025023157,0.0003899539,0.00031240785,0.0009760374,0.0026843257,0.007347249,0.00081899343,0.0016702389,0.0134221725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052924855,0.00023217846,0.00020277436,0.0017962612,0.019146133,0.0068650194,0.0019442441,0.0027361247,0.0010836677],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021740188,0.0000016044373,0.000033481545,0.00000739599,3.5234862e-7,0.0000044250105,0.00037319996,0.000050478688,0.000016134496,0.99555606,0.0014892663,0.0024653687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060122943,0.000006298625,0.00047353114,0.00007698475,0.0000019893982,0.000019796014,0.0011190046,0.00024145939,0.00012532245,0.94022566,0.0576998,0.0000041662984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029744415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053157136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0134221725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044076475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002812039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04490161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2294915047","doi":"","title":"Democratic Legitimacy of Unwritten Constitutionalism: India and Canada - A Comparative Analysis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Legitimacy; Democracy; Political science; Democratic legitimacy; Political economy; Law; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.025695080106548664,"score_gpt":0.2950286610292736,"score_spread":0.26933358092272497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2294915047","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.777737,0.0023160481,0.0003644406,0.011071452,0.000046992747,0.00006133073,0.0007045824,0.000046763802,0.20765138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99673116,0.00041424844,0.000060247934,0.0001333916,0.000008140765,0.000005048969,0.000058727484,0.000007368828,0.0025815847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.990346,0.001071405,0.00020417743,0.00055445894,0.0037713493,0.00405264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9634792,0.01430197,0.0033146455,0.0018101734,0.013465775,0.0036281806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044014645,0.00024439517,0.00088661595,0.0052036555,0.015124491,0.0135686975,0.0030465936,0.0018171662,0.008641171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03155582,0.0003018605,0.0004836102,0.012765874,0.013929154,0.002232114,0.0036308218,0.0037835266,0.00028994406],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004953697,0.00023832779,0.1292633,0.00035523676,0.00023671724,0.0011888648,0.048745688,0.0038147178,0.000593697,0.74877053,0.018609487,0.047688145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032027293,0.00020333163,0.6338216,0.00074221863,0.000913129,0.0005457162,0.15266399,0.0052938405,0.0014780064,0.06470954,0.13889943,0.00040899942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9883428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99446267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09949132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09949132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17691138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7218634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2297785821","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1501","title":"Book Review: Courting the Right - Review of: The Charter Revolution and the Court Party, by Ted Morton and Rainer Knopff","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.008407035235305336,"score_gpt":0.2560835284093983,"score_spread":0.24767649317409296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2297785821","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002816028,0.44049007,0.0002559347,0.4377592,0.08579763,0.00004295038,0.00024305911,0.00007394074,0.035055626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011153067,0.3036661,0.0005998638,0.34639692,0.15431248,0.0002123037,0.00039514684,0.00019489814,0.18306912],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947978,0.0017314265,0.0003251703,0.00041204796,0.0023890177,0.00034450492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9703976,0.019561173,0.0014274328,0.0009045534,0.0064582666,0.0012509746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059319097,0.0008502886,0.0016701412,0.003720602,0.0036775896,0.0088377055,0.0024588446,0.014703177,0.018190369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040736593,0.0009001816,0.0005470161,0.004651161,0.006004014,0.0055876807,0.0014518166,0.00994558,0.010029542],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032159924,0.0000024429326,0.0000146658185,0.000053280222,0.000002351383,0.000007239889,0.000021679925,0.0000121645835,0.000008527371,0.002214009,0.99390805,0.0037523306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014462935,0.0000069946586,0.0003257677,0.0007778194,0.000010310616,0.000038764,0.00012339008,0.000040907347,0.0000392621,0.006856005,0.9917502,0.000016092157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0372563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12507106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0372563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075527327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0128435455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07407892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299104585","doi":"","title":"Les Droits Collectifs Et Leurs Implications Pour L'Article 1 De La Charte Canadienne (Collective Rights and Their Implications for Section 1 of the Canadian Charter)","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Humanities; Sociology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04925494521044273,"score_gpt":0.29622811800539894,"score_spread":0.24697317279495623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299104585","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042330954,0.020044645,0.009495179,0.09844071,0.0015012411,0.00023962268,0.0032158145,0.00011523842,0.82461655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7409307,0.009158783,0.006975224,0.008539387,0.00068372284,0.00031001272,0.00079303706,0.000111529356,0.23249769],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920934,0.0012501063,0.00013824725,0.00089978386,0.0033472565,0.002271146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945041,0.0016696106,0.00037341585,0.00037956206,0.0026200826,0.00045324554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049280887,0.0006010841,0.0005804603,0.0026607888,0.0123874415,0.0118228495,0.0018696042,0.0029114543,0.015233535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009292898,0.0003954515,0.0006688483,0.005437565,0.01858382,0.003160162,0.0025439165,0.004888448,0.00073762715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008057042,0.000004283897,0.0005106717,0.00003490866,0.000003777441,0.000036120557,0.0024696083,0.00028830202,0.00004830962,0.97012454,0.020352742,0.006118708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021512471,0.000026118963,0.020497214,0.00053399865,0.00002341501,0.00007523413,0.0067987987,0.0007124268,0.00025614962,0.17585607,0.7950797,0.00011927296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9700179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9770264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.089762844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.089762844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.086818114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6512781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2300761802","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.2015.e17","title":"Measuring Activism and Restraint: An Alternative Perspective on the Supreme Court of Canada’s Exclusion of Evidence Decisions under Section 24(2) of the Charter","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Assertion; Sociology; Criminology","score_opus":0.30224843243648697,"score_gpt":0.3440805876293182,"score_spread":0.04183215519283123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2300761802","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5464558,0.003860319,0.01808455,0.0569585,0.00058945105,0.0004733961,0.0011714861,0.00005893338,0.37234753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866432,0.0004953553,0.0039594783,0.0032340537,0.00009152462,0.00009867238,0.00018136414,0.00001885634,0.0052775526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9762199,0.0058580698,0.0011930687,0.0014232646,0.011625923,0.003679764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9417336,0.023959393,0.009214017,0.0025238327,0.017885292,0.0046838485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016426783,0.00046209325,0.00064134545,0.0065056933,0.013743497,0.011819434,0.0027022157,0.0021007315,0.0031096276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04608022,0.00034146672,0.00071246875,0.009856895,0.03271019,0.0042465283,0.0054144827,0.006929838,0.0001669615],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016176402,0.0002362271,0.15919527,0.00021974051,0.00013031406,0.00041242313,0.14832278,0.0009147442,0.0017399583,0.631962,0.0091703525,0.047534466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008810902,0.00033106445,0.6112158,0.0010864206,0.00015717067,0.00025327806,0.09821146,0.0021506206,0.0021570015,0.10898166,0.1750007,0.00036671155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92239034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94190437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07760966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052408367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.075816825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3802511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2300764146","doi":"","title":"Canadian Federalism, the Privy Council and the Supreme Court","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Federalism; Political science; Law; New Federalism; Politics","score_opus":0.019983499610935568,"score_gpt":0.2442708159068737,"score_spread":0.22428731629593812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2300764146","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10262679,0.021299306,0.00091278984,0.27810067,0.0009294656,0.00006476465,0.0012661554,0.00004884326,0.5947511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8981563,0.0061809574,0.00069389463,0.017101943,0.00038340606,0.000042677853,0.00023081886,0.000046708104,0.07716322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99301684,0.0010442083,0.00010748882,0.000638564,0.002192033,0.0030009393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896019,0.0035383129,0.0006545988,0.00040137547,0.0038634979,0.0019403133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005761331,0.0004717613,0.0009124233,0.00335143,0.033760373,0.014239623,0.0024132736,0.0077495244,0.022862272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023031492,0.0006073641,0.0005168932,0.008233758,0.018294185,0.0051441044,0.0030405412,0.0069970335,0.00068671966],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046453875,0.000024708716,0.0028539924,0.000060078124,0.000018666187,0.00006287936,0.0030674108,0.00034408766,0.000053882755,0.9235533,0.061653826,0.008260734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016030436,0.00003941716,0.055597395,0.0007676227,0.00015818117,0.00009408892,0.021849902,0.0013336225,0.00031714348,0.32469845,0.59476614,0.00021764374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99618334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22458081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22458081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2957284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89937633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301262126","doi":"","title":"White Fire: Structural Indeterminacy, Constitutional Design, and the Constitution Behind the Text","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Constitution; Constitutional theory; Democracy; Constitutional economics; Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Constitutional crisis; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.013365190809731874,"score_gpt":0.2745297711332952,"score_spread":0.2611645803235633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301262126","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0992885,0.00816491,0.13918662,0.08462112,0.0011162566,0.00015421436,0.00014644663,0.00026326894,0.6670587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96586835,0.0008903677,0.008508217,0.0021259538,0.00028957025,0.00011317046,0.00004659515,0.00011286285,0.022044906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9849754,0.009928084,0.00041713656,0.0017281242,0.0019049254,0.0010463111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838965,0.011547461,0.00079187664,0.0023533443,0.0010653912,0.00034556742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018070597,0.00037989992,0.0006079259,0.0015860528,0.009388615,0.013491872,0.0018506813,0.0034770225,0.004834032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024480361,0.00045862998,0.00038062932,0.0018503582,0.07454791,0.009980027,0.0042055734,0.00610879,0.00042576727],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032573869,0.0000016305949,0.000049452436,0.000006244185,0.0000010118628,0.000012845722,0.0016169754,0.00008883621,0.000031516673,0.99621177,0.00034269327,0.0016337525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011856471,0.0000075919925,0.00013131762,0.000051635496,0.0000046949526,0.000021356553,0.0009754691,0.00039200502,0.00021227199,0.9649957,0.03318681,0.0000092286355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011504635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011027001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018070597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00888663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009072532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.095567584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301715742","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2081995","title":"Judicial Independence and Democracy in Nova Scotia","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Independence (probability theory); Nova (rocket); Democracy; Political science; Law; Geology; Mathematics; Politics; Oceanography; Engineering; Statistics","score_opus":0.01307105187898912,"score_gpt":0.28850708226887584,"score_spread":0.27543603038988673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301715742","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95530516,0.0011705137,0.00006814338,0.0067861634,0.00005867507,0.000030692725,0.0005610001,0.0000065953514,0.03601297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903628,0.0003022232,0.000043472122,0.0008753792,0.000015388992,0.000010790883,0.000085103085,0.0000035393364,0.008301344],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970612,0.00032891077,0.00010129846,0.00019754973,0.00033182002,0.001979204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930942,0.0021124773,0.0014391693,0.00020793533,0.0012699075,0.001876218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015345023,0.00015606194,0.0005041362,0.0016573385,0.0058541666,0.0038282624,0.0008320212,0.0014630508,0.004640789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008874634,0.00024213862,0.00029999908,0.0022144967,0.0030573427,0.0006792957,0.0029556889,0.0024312423,0.00035666078],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016071385,0.00031680934,0.6793065,0.00049472816,0.00034423423,0.017051024,0.04646205,0.0043506343,0.0039028414,0.17313907,0.026555946,0.046468984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001534512,0.00009576822,0.9515046,0.00022720832,0.00006893296,0.00045066196,0.016015476,0.0009116119,0.000389728,0.005116377,0.025005726,0.000060569266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9406187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98672265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059381306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03088191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036112305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.224065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2306762395","doi":"","title":"Ontario and the Direct Access Model to Human Rights","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Human rights; Enforcement; Statute; Political science; Work (physics); Law; Legislature; International human rights law; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.02273174387358119,"score_gpt":0.2958025081941879,"score_spread":0.27307076432060673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2306762395","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019611694,0.0027356641,0.003881964,0.036951832,0.00018402329,0.000095594114,0.00017925983,0.000039261242,0.93632066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7693049,0.0026129556,0.0028341534,0.008347229,0.00017010685,0.00012376516,0.00008499516,0.000045738034,0.2164761],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916734,0.0012410814,0.00016190713,0.0007417514,0.003928796,0.0022530335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99701023,0.000698871,0.00022568772,0.00041164158,0.0011722217,0.00048132663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029341648,0.00031590878,0.00032289303,0.0011415499,0.014524948,0.007025717,0.0014709864,0.0044194562,0.010004347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005965874,0.00040614465,0.0005687629,0.0015617626,0.027888453,0.0031772282,0.004188198,0.004010316,0.0007815996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005932829,0.0000040822,0.000449469,0.000012961185,0.0000027418753,0.00004313355,0.001112464,0.00013294395,0.000044096676,0.99088097,0.0048744245,0.0024367203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000885096,0.00003983821,0.008617993,0.00034734837,0.000048492464,0.00020808657,0.0034776484,0.0012478457,0.00027169051,0.40069208,0.5848846,0.00007587469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95584464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9747516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11199025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11199025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09541981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81254995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2310502863","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4958279","title":"A Comparative Law Analysis of U.S. Judicial Assistance","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02340685735882302,"score_gpt":0.3306394652976949,"score_spread":0.30723260793887186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2310502863","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12813398,0.0090666935,0.0021691876,0.004787244,0.00016376098,0.00004842053,0.0011332908,0.000046164216,0.8544513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9643783,0.0038559474,0.0010343692,0.00080270326,0.00011334546,0.00008862959,0.0003552328,0.000021260512,0.0293503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951438,0.0019739682,0.00012077258,0.00033463884,0.0016060313,0.00082084787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936831,0.0026063498,0.0006046511,0.00043851417,0.0024619596,0.0002055051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026120613,0.00022055546,0.0003286397,0.008712184,0.0031065189,0.004341211,0.0009784629,0.0014801945,0.016095955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0120110735,0.00022134694,0.0003914178,0.012012098,0.0028482976,0.0024178145,0.001683279,0.001167717,0.0007235328],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041899875,0.000029103521,0.0033500681,0.00009266949,0.000028918097,0.00013620312,0.0023388774,0.0008823653,0.00010674731,0.9593266,0.010706634,0.022959962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008805292,0.00021733696,0.098526284,0.0010932831,0.00017477846,0.00044685884,0.014252254,0.0040926137,0.0011007596,0.19312468,0.6868179,0.00006524755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06889511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13859826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06889511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012146832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062224157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13698816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2311267665","doi":"","title":"Does Judicial Independence Matter? A Study of the Determinants of Administrative Litigation in an Authoritarian Regime","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial independence; Political science; Rule of law; Plaintiff; Judicial review; Context (archaeology); Authoritarianism; Administrative law; Law; Corporate governance; Law and economics; Democracy; Business; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.05875214024543815,"score_gpt":0.3435176419116362,"score_spread":0.2847655016661981,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2311267665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9633552,0.0008308992,0.0011274598,0.005935035,0.000035310568,0.0000502591,0.0001063552,0.000012410683,0.028547175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981699,0.00016108205,0.000057470257,0.00019842533,0.00006141141,0.000008885609,0.000041898078,0.0000045787724,0.0012964377],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898268,0.003172613,0.0007166424,0.0011845923,0.002159499,0.0029399325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86562884,0.06708484,0.050088953,0.0030372867,0.0041717114,0.009988413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007416365,0.00017981236,0.00077187625,0.0025393835,0.0036182646,0.00620559,0.0018095054,0.0023973922,0.01597778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052110065,0.0003500506,0.0006801031,0.003145716,0.0051294323,0.003694576,0.0032495956,0.0042842925,0.0013494651],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024084921,0.0010627618,0.91078436,0.00006222012,0.0002067838,0.00088917825,0.0051517105,0.0014770157,0.0006853733,0.054442856,0.002844844,0.022152092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006721405,0.0002549629,0.96655524,0.000114614435,0.00011295906,0.00031515202,0.006081911,0.003084309,0.00035866012,0.016366884,0.0066535417,0.000034673845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015353903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017005673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01597778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035694658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044872896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053450942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2313550107","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1163","title":"American Citations and the McLachlin Court: An Empirical Study","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Categorization; Law; Political science; Point (geometry); Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04015214137463527,"score_gpt":0.3702610854581444,"score_spread":0.3301089440835091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2313550107","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95091134,0.0035410074,0.00023890886,0.002915584,0.000045938174,0.00004151415,0.000137031,0.000012270846,0.04215649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99537224,0.0018231119,0.0001729266,0.00033482918,0.00008594656,0.000016304324,0.00006832088,0.000007627776,0.0021187672],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913378,0.002976481,0.00042618747,0.00062099274,0.003785191,0.00085336925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9086038,0.046039887,0.02099735,0.0016968169,0.018225519,0.004436601],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007056328,0.0001583305,0.00049710216,0.012810499,0.00679647,0.005632807,0.0010412892,0.0014120511,0.0040531945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055705585,0.00017870001,0.00016740148,0.035729017,0.0055792346,0.0047500893,0.0026850034,0.0024040798,0.00045522867],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002561006,0.00088034634,0.5206793,0.00046309925,0.000084030115,0.0017900636,0.1696159,0.000545452,0.00072844524,0.15671389,0.017282942,0.13096035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064065534,0.00034443088,0.7002806,0.00076973025,0.00013317342,0.0014947368,0.16103092,0.0012132745,0.0006260378,0.014719595,0.119180195,0.00014331679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10631291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21505673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9918721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008127926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007615813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21138817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2314620070","doi":"","title":"The Alice in Wonderland Dimension of the Canadian Judicial System","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Indigenous policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Alice (programming language); Politics; Service (business); Dimension (graph theory); Law; Political science; Sociology; History; Art history; Business","score_opus":0.03190943470438198,"score_gpt":0.2730860767032751,"score_spread":0.24117664199889313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2314620070","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07151578,0.0067799822,0.0030685414,0.15841153,0.0005439944,0.00005010505,0.00029951366,0.000067138826,0.7592635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9445421,0.0031751392,0.00097182696,0.009898814,0.00018563525,0.000022909526,0.00005350916,0.000031525007,0.04111854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942174,0.0011454665,0.00008968668,0.00050160126,0.0018633584,0.0021824762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99565744,0.0012959647,0.000284589,0.00023654311,0.0015301441,0.0009953255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033750772,0.00027487287,0.00036125636,0.0022109046,0.039916366,0.015131503,0.0014751042,0.0026818311,0.0059031947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007983545,0.00027333936,0.00026322177,0.0029784248,0.059085768,0.0039266935,0.003806134,0.0058223107,0.00029049578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060300404,0.0000037449797,0.00069679116,0.000021512471,0.0000030508377,0.000060927792,0.011596672,0.00008799168,0.00009531605,0.968049,0.015271469,0.0041075894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002203826,0.00002037277,0.01603124,0.00039582673,0.000041099058,0.00021615683,0.0737728,0.00082835625,0.00048241575,0.19899303,0.7090333,0.0001633864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9776765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9898566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10161213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10161213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13766147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73725104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W231489046","doi":"","title":"Social Science Evidence in Constitutional Rights Cases in Germany and Canada: Some Comparative Observations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Fredericton; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Constitutional law; Social rights; Law; Human rights","score_opus":0.0732627663103254,"score_gpt":0.3272499201419768,"score_spread":0.2539871538316514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W231489046","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84381586,0.01490393,0.0004114581,0.012432285,0.000057144887,0.00008861753,0.0027122512,0.000019045943,0.12555937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940474,0.0020766186,0.00013787218,0.00068365945,0.00002523266,0.00001313435,0.000580638,0.00000872455,0.0024267081],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893611,0.0016058339,0.00041412073,0.00085049483,0.00426704,0.0035014194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92204696,0.045957237,0.0077929883,0.0025858565,0.018108126,0.0035089322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009806469,0.00046665006,0.0014457956,0.017366711,0.012278393,0.00976239,0.00336313,0.0030098597,0.011984145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05966054,0.00048181502,0.00070514245,0.028486952,0.01274706,0.0040715663,0.004803614,0.0024928984,0.00038757827],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020314134,0.0008855387,0.3969448,0.0019738895,0.0013237221,0.0031697906,0.07203218,0.0029315886,0.0016683786,0.39425322,0.03226697,0.09051852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021938937,0.000111325724,0.84171766,0.0012106032,0.000868603,0.00027308916,0.085726306,0.0008702003,0.0014101197,0.01578331,0.051662784,0.00014674607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97236633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9864825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9412414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058758646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053421292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4263258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2315473695","doi":"10.1017/s0026749x13000024","title":"The Case of Ayesha, Muslim ‘Courts’, and the Rule of Law: Some ethnographic lessons for legal theory","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Asian Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; State (computer science); Islam; Law; Subaltern; Rule of law; Converse; Political science; Sociology; Elite; Idealization; Geography; Philosophy; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.044896317712816734,"score_gpt":0.3437683140837928,"score_spread":0.2988719963709761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2315473695","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9527347,0.0011837579,0.0013474855,0.006506032,0.000082986124,0.00009341537,0.00006480117,0.000013614708,0.037973184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99509275,0.00065051013,0.00054915855,0.0004980087,0.00003613795,0.00004754976,0.000021160755,0.00001034151,0.0030943435],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893946,0.009049133,0.00015432155,0.00036487365,0.00035736876,0.0006797029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853963,0.01274031,0.00053008844,0.00044625002,0.00038016879,0.0005068724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006477247,0.0005087701,0.0005743376,0.003042531,0.019346928,0.01032193,0.0022535985,0.002686991,0.0045044953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008436232,0.00062601396,0.00027354376,0.0028817318,0.03850405,0.010081717,0.007437382,0.004905222,0.000293742],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055542596,0.000022886767,0.00086835935,0.000024924984,0.0000012604419,0.00042033568,0.9849783,0.000014726315,0.00010767496,0.012271048,0.0002388994,0.001045991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013818662,0.00000892952,0.0006624737,0.000052438278,0.000001026347,0.00019744493,0.9931537,0.00003874001,0.000050435458,0.0009884497,0.004840092,0.000004971534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025372978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04392618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025372978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004825353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025165754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050450563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2316239106","doi":"10.1017/s0008423911000151","title":"Explaining Dissent on the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Supreme court; Political science; Humanities; Ambiguity; Law; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06497905880260811,"score_gpt":0.2743127841513881,"score_spread":0.20933372534877998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2316239106","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8581546,0.000852776,0.0027900878,0.009869402,0.00010778871,0.00009951386,0.0011554748,0.000042168656,0.1269281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995906,0.000110616784,0.00024085285,0.00020832014,0.000012790385,0.0000060444813,0.000097169235,0.000003909957,0.0034142842],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962632,0.00032871458,0.00009105886,0.00032876225,0.0020297316,0.0009585625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991115,0.0029868768,0.0014487538,0.00033099696,0.0032482622,0.0008700364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031170764,0.00029407348,0.00035094444,0.0025890034,0.006745082,0.0031261782,0.0010593226,0.001059842,0.0076763975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01637742,0.0001671662,0.00044962004,0.002787053,0.0041556675,0.00095442485,0.002192971,0.0015487927,0.00024287806],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019361847,0.00008456637,0.46326935,0.000162874,0.00013160815,0.001950376,0.020703161,0.01677873,0.0008148583,0.43788984,0.018752035,0.03926891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009258533,0.000086281645,0.63392335,0.00038646453,0.00019471593,0.00046609895,0.039157048,0.042652726,0.002016673,0.18750887,0.09326212,0.00025314596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9353348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94084805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0646652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042835206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037415184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31079262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2316378233","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100006554","title":"Confronting Judicial Supremacy: A Defence of Judicial Activism and the Supreme Court of Cananda's Legal Rights Jurisprudence","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Jurisprudence; Political science; Supreme court; Philosophy; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.015321607028045425,"score_gpt":0.2568337746417047,"score_spread":0.2415121676136593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2316378233","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0905345,0.005422693,0.00724987,0.056431793,0.00032506694,0.00004489679,0.000036598223,0.000030407702,0.83992416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809399,0.0006697551,0.00038681392,0.0021931427,0.00016743255,0.00002459256,0.0000068217646,0.000009719994,0.0156017635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99575055,0.0017641573,0.000060317547,0.00037283383,0.00090265216,0.0011495197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99443686,0.0037880328,0.00040061565,0.00028556387,0.00075276755,0.00033619694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046996297,0.00031954006,0.00041855563,0.0015903005,0.009299477,0.011419971,0.0016818733,0.0054960316,0.0044198446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008720877,0.00021647263,0.00033795187,0.001416446,0.04517407,0.0036264516,0.0036713558,0.007154469,0.00019099755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003632309,0.0000026527696,0.00009856597,0.0000060739876,0.0000012811415,0.000030208008,0.0033798376,0.00008757322,0.0000246119,0.9950081,0.0005923127,0.0007651534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004056837,0.000026663909,0.0017657585,0.0003502025,0.000036337486,0.00006899918,0.015235848,0.0019734693,0.0005762666,0.8435114,0.1363834,0.000031137228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23794964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34158945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7620504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029277066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021982059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4731292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2316790870","doi":"10.1628/joer-2007-0032","title":"Certaines utilisations de principes constitutionnels implicites par la Cour suprême du Canada","year":2007,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Jahrbuch des öffentlichen Rechts der Gegenwart Neue Folge","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art","score_opus":0.026801567828237255,"score_gpt":0.278337684001233,"score_spread":0.25153611617299576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2316790870","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17085804,0.0037478053,0.006337107,0.036267687,0.00033548253,0.000036893347,0.00022054317,0.00005422676,0.7821422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827225,0.00053571915,0.00062712893,0.0007919216,0.000023754363,0.000006363132,0.000020638778,0.00001316563,0.015258752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99537754,0.0011589893,0.00014052475,0.0005126107,0.0014914729,0.001318913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99502665,0.0016007903,0.00032539773,0.00064007466,0.002131579,0.0002756084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042188778,0.0002228872,0.00031811872,0.0009073218,0.012957024,0.009183288,0.00096974504,0.002012516,0.0040991176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00974546,0.00020043958,0.00025355665,0.0016027099,0.02251077,0.0023968471,0.0022109046,0.0037854016,0.0002239709],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009355679,0.0000028298798,0.0010794494,0.000017383754,0.000004851413,0.00004893464,0.010326302,0.000119460565,0.00014103252,0.9811091,0.0023999708,0.0047414945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039652416,0.000029425359,0.02524351,0.00044305998,0.000074563504,0.00027871184,0.042107932,0.0018117784,0.0017002554,0.30922395,0.61892074,0.0001264104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8419151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9239943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96698374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033016276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04525981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3180318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317993304","doi":"10.1017/s1744552313000037","title":"The Question for the Description of the Law. By Reidar Edvinsson, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2009. x + 113 pp. ISBN 978-3-540-70501-7, £99 hardback.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Law and economics; Law; Political science; Sociology; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.029214662150871908,"score_gpt":0.30505415021221577,"score_spread":0.27583948806134384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317993304","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008177844,0.64667815,0.003455099,0.2268782,0.010276364,0.000018311468,0.00032433408,0.00008256416,0.1114691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11316093,0.44938943,0.008183196,0.04513307,0.014806765,0.00017066828,0.00088071584,0.0006068365,0.3676684],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982591,0.00075357175,0.00010731225,0.00025697149,0.00049333705,0.00012963971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986401,0.0006925443,0.00015594436,0.00015090751,0.0002596104,0.000100869875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026548933,0.00078560447,0.0007675586,0.0018250047,0.0018008591,0.005792871,0.0015328616,0.0034301956,0.027058925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065486236,0.0005855363,0.0005241458,0.0019244573,0.01020092,0.014370978,0.0024754899,0.005223705,0.008753887],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023934546,0.000010328912,0.0000921661,0.0002755132,0.00000826369,0.000054921013,0.0011439145,0.000080393154,0.00007847979,0.41588745,0.53512603,0.047218632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060074217,0.00000568531,0.00025951889,0.00083340553,0.0000031474792,0.00012547671,0.0010743688,0.00007659865,0.000052646483,0.14532225,0.85223293,0.000008081403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006700784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007985573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027058925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035838205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027662104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09052116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317999976","doi":"10.4000/ethiquepublique.1976","title":"La réforme du mode de scrutin : l’unanimité des partis est-elle indispensable ?","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Éthique Publique","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021384395422956285,"score_gpt":0.28041728380327124,"score_spread":0.25903288838031496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317999976","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.066016145,0.007741252,0.014017553,0.17759754,0.0006406145,0.000067551766,0.00012890791,0.00009050639,0.7336999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9126097,0.0014769098,0.0015737524,0.0071260645,0.00025972922,0.00005927441,0.000026044565,0.00004201009,0.07682657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940147,0.002240185,0.00008737923,0.00085290935,0.001369721,0.0014351836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962334,0.0010337045,0.00029203395,0.000661924,0.0013081414,0.00047081595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052610394,0.0002520187,0.00042856883,0.0011743316,0.009583533,0.010510429,0.001279979,0.0035524233,0.0061823986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008092456,0.00023057354,0.00034277528,0.0010603782,0.027364723,0.0043630903,0.002599905,0.005306167,0.00057880103],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058246856,0.0000032081248,0.00022217308,0.000012876914,0.000002821387,0.000019564557,0.0012197834,0.00006641075,0.000098923985,0.99223715,0.0033512074,0.0027601318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005357935,0.00004415921,0.0065164855,0.00036457818,0.00004441376,0.00009063025,0.0067172744,0.0012293413,0.0010337925,0.6029406,0.38091058,0.00005461741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3787736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5022551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3787736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035090607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037577156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75313777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318171966","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100008127","title":"Dual Legal systems and the Basic Structure Doctrine or Constitutions: The Case of India","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Constitution; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01607851521358937,"score_gpt":0.2554981068312578,"score_spread":0.2394195916176684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318171966","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1394967,0.0018895189,0.0026489168,0.0075616185,0.0000923515,0.000033525066,0.000102722195,0.000040009734,0.84813464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98001194,0.00042590583,0.00041635626,0.00029324368,0.000033221844,0.00002177159,0.000021748472,0.000006407059,0.018769512],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860066,0.00036480307,0.000041135816,0.00010710089,0.0002910318,0.00059515337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896395,0.0005289063,0.00013520518,0.00014451506,0.00013491124,0.00009257426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093541836,0.00014221214,0.00018637639,0.0016292382,0.004112329,0.0055997646,0.0008412705,0.0015279149,0.0062811156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017505235,0.00019616919,0.0004230084,0.0018373749,0.023731422,0.002250468,0.0037819326,0.0024043634,0.00044031994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001603661,0.0000013371567,0.000100704965,0.0000048169313,5.895473e-7,0.0000338648,0.00084151095,0.000073313,0.000015338439,0.9983138,0.00023755836,0.000375483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039913684,0.00002308437,0.003969909,0.000113284324,0.000022971271,0.00030186254,0.007567208,0.0013435312,0.00029218537,0.8712151,0.11508264,0.000028244445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044479795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043459773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044479795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0113897985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047819167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08844179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318623215","doi":"10.1017/s0021223716000017","title":"The Canadian Charter's Override Clause: Lessons for Israel","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Legislature; Charter; Political science; Politics; Supreme court; Law; State (computer science); Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.07008557188768984,"score_gpt":0.363649075735374,"score_spread":0.2935635038476842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318623215","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057796136,0.014754386,0.004017512,0.22328335,0.0007743828,0.000069820715,0.0001975483,0.0000747358,0.6990321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8747609,0.011011788,0.0043463605,0.03697563,0.00052866933,0.00004053315,0.000103653394,0.000063499305,0.07216892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954652,0.0007008017,0.00007996818,0.00039353425,0.0021123604,0.0012482292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99480504,0.0020523556,0.00023786715,0.0002519737,0.002141895,0.0005108951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061605987,0.00021065214,0.00036890266,0.001271958,0.009045505,0.008607126,0.0013198659,0.0034166004,0.004065598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008643794,0.00020175762,0.00033551705,0.0016396552,0.013421871,0.0029897445,0.0015168331,0.0049873358,0.00030384527],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014101039,0.000008554491,0.0007013558,0.000020762816,0.0000036271354,0.00006313912,0.0014972792,0.0002234458,0.00008588943,0.9639696,0.016404407,0.017007941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006675885,0.000035184912,0.008469929,0.00042596468,0.00004011764,0.00016453974,0.0065550273,0.001720349,0.0009412626,0.19041534,0.79102296,0.00014257475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91286075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93885547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08713925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05858666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.077131204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42507792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2319359069","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1286","title":"A New Era in the Selection of Supreme Court Judges?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Selection (genetic algorithm); Law; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0207418315513999,"score_gpt":0.2729500003378018,"score_spread":0.2522081687864019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2319359069","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10067607,0.021276278,0.030321209,0.61422426,0.0051025464,0.000078984005,0.00019145536,0.00011898384,0.22801022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91801226,0.0036408198,0.008220889,0.0433213,0.0068416134,0.00016663413,0.00009868821,0.0002536802,0.01944406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9592314,0.028117614,0.00086112577,0.0039572916,0.004716652,0.003115864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90206534,0.06162701,0.004139889,0.007966811,0.012211905,0.011989017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.054218482,0.0004864174,0.0013753192,0.0036353562,0.00958515,0.016253106,0.0037140308,0.006086559,0.020996165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.102828175,0.0007779296,0.0005179185,0.0037404206,0.033405587,0.018601801,0.0064487043,0.009481968,0.002160949],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018685551,0.00014686011,0.006007404,0.00009253575,0.000025451773,0.000096257194,0.008281486,0.00017909755,0.00027576587,0.8728469,0.038060468,0.07380091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019407543,0.00014082521,0.009790892,0.0005904091,0.00002448896,0.00018373992,0.015986476,0.0012588195,0.00033875255,0.7831851,0.18821514,0.00009133998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005785864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014688899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9942141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007190757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009049079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28673822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320877804","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100007092","title":"Paul Howe and Peter H. Russell (eds.), Judicial Power and Canadian Democracy, Montreal / Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2001, xviii + 327 pp.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Media studies; Power (physics); Art history; Humanities; Art; Sociology; Physics","score_opus":0.012215415330278374,"score_gpt":0.21521116453386585,"score_spread":0.20299574920358748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320877804","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00052610604,0.95452446,0.00078893406,0.019010067,0.0015099196,0.000018359524,0.00047315104,0.00005909302,0.023089986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007683004,0.95723116,0.001178881,0.001207017,0.0007383175,0.000019463432,0.00027981473,0.00005896822,0.031603374],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989679,0.00013180466,0.000050018003,0.00009752572,0.0005878761,0.00016486034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978688,0.00068305153,0.00017977589,0.00006362577,0.0008317595,0.0003730877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019009472,0.0017704413,0.0013760718,0.0045741117,0.003784084,0.0065352176,0.0020436768,0.0022372077,0.026982097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033394054,0.0015109091,0.0004774195,0.009451724,0.0041650967,0.008048675,0.0010613742,0.0026174968,0.010456907],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032692224,0.00002298363,0.0008062321,0.0012861474,0.000027037748,0.00007866224,0.002369874,0.00023458891,0.0001399774,0.014665331,0.86810166,0.11223476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013368964,0.000009037236,0.007523533,0.0017927345,0.000047743284,0.00016311649,0.0023913807,0.0001074682,0.0001990746,0.0105845705,0.9771254,0.000042532538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6817293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8733973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31827068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014567677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6402901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2325992556","doi":"10.14288/1.0096786","title":"An administrative history of the Supreme Court of British Columbia with particular reference to the Vancouver registry : its civil records, their composition, and their selection for preservation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Composition (language); Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.02237188476977705,"score_gpt":0.20964994085904062,"score_spread":0.18727805608926357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2325992556","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35706466,0.025638944,0.003092358,0.039797682,0.0012039668,0.000386652,0.016106445,0.00025222317,0.55645704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72266763,0.009791782,0.002170576,0.0020202782,0.00011936758,0.000116470736,0.0033926447,0.00011751101,0.25960374],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975889,0.00034996637,0.00014417623,0.0002527333,0.0011213458,0.00054299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906192,0.002148291,0.0005794329,0.0006219592,0.004882321,0.0011487344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012682328,0.0001887584,0.00023542768,0.005463696,0.016140373,0.00909685,0.0013286327,0.0009866158,0.009609697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007747652,0.0005976497,0.0000865532,0.016911639,0.0039552776,0.001471685,0.001750696,0.0021130606,0.0009985152],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006834069,0.000054211763,0.061664663,0.0006533907,0.00004837963,0.0022275597,0.09377788,0.0007513842,0.0016849836,0.19139014,0.3703556,0.27732342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048406782,0.000014153452,0.1340479,0.00041168273,0.000021093227,0.00028709983,0.030791212,0.00021611928,0.0003979981,0.0027301053,0.8309979,0.00007986933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98368603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99694794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0566156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0566156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08431372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41077685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329462712","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2931484","title":"Modelling Fundamental Legal Change: The Paradox of Context and the Context of Paradox","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.049322577273554165,"score_gpt":0.29172302385721355,"score_spread":0.2424004465836594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2329462712","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40833858,0.0034882238,0.35528636,0.036005862,0.0005085207,0.0001582344,0.00069186656,0.0002341321,0.19528817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9826568,0.00047053353,0.01443372,0.00021310427,0.0000668556,0.00005690359,0.000054536507,0.000033224125,0.0020143373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974794,0.0017993905,0.00007157689,0.00025573652,0.00016389269,0.00023004143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892574,0.008025217,0.00067402545,0.0008944224,0.0004637048,0.00068521884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037599136,0.000639961,0.0010616077,0.0013282064,0.0018053185,0.0067671356,0.002723494,0.0037794546,0.007588049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020105524,0.0006646639,0.0008440217,0.0015932142,0.0071278177,0.010186346,0.003907287,0.0039472063,0.0003886618],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032038533,0.00004231685,0.00087918923,0.00004310191,0.00001539893,0.00010148312,0.00064447906,0.046456534,0.00010647792,0.9489402,0.00055781374,0.0021809067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022877353,0.000013006141,0.00023693871,0.0000237846,0.000012828798,0.00002594545,0.00062746275,0.109866925,0.00005454551,0.88682735,0.0022736315,0.000014737761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009878055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009520934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009878055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003619401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034294114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026260734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329744406","doi":"10.1017/s0008423900000226","title":"A Response to Mendelsohn's “Public Brokerage: Constitutional Reform and the Accommodation of Mass Publics”","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publics; Accommodation; Constitution; Political science; Principal (computer security); Limiting; Constitutional law; Public service; Law and economics; Law; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.029192557794829696,"score_gpt":0.29541640299359456,"score_spread":0.26622384519876485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2329744406","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003206044,0.0019956448,0.00092476385,0.9786704,0.00116448,0.000014108281,0.000051339302,0.0000199348,0.013953248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.172676,0.0031737834,0.0021178138,0.7790902,0.0024713783,0.00006550924,0.000046256682,0.00007655352,0.040282417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99070764,0.0023904163,0.00022809676,0.0013000645,0.0034301467,0.0019437227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876874,0.0071947933,0.00057931576,0.00044410824,0.002643444,0.001451033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009414724,0.00071316096,0.00077160087,0.0012275331,0.020973315,0.011469467,0.0036295883,0.0344313,0.0052370653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02598615,0.0006635244,0.00080680865,0.0027073182,0.031510957,0.007748744,0.0040975623,0.024836795,0.00047424654],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037261405,0.000017455443,0.0004313251,0.000047002846,0.00000878693,0.0002979066,0.009370438,0.00023183983,0.00021813426,0.604078,0.38008338,0.0051784487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009259877,0.000025334852,0.0016478802,0.00029094558,0.000028169909,0.00024260268,0.012716078,0.00091429456,0.00082228344,0.171048,0.81201226,0.00015958457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.719842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8321471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28015798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047946196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04866392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5636158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2331375094","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Override: Constitutional Model or Bête Noire of Constitutional Politics?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Knesset; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Constitutional law; Politics; Legislation; Constitutional court; Basic law; Israeli law; Constitution; Parliament; Common law; Municipal law","score_opus":0.04098377836588365,"score_gpt":0.3037416626573402,"score_spread":0.2627578842914566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2331375094","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023404226,0.008569348,0.0055935257,0.16935995,0.0015963386,0.000052333387,0.0002925089,0.000109809414,0.791022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87322646,0.0067932196,0.0031606578,0.038777493,0.00051899976,0.00005171026,0.00016202255,0.00017651502,0.077132985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99097437,0.001441854,0.00011788125,0.0012813347,0.0038064094,0.0023781804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951958,0.0012664825,0.00019076119,0.00034309845,0.0022215156,0.00078233413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004661382,0.0005758903,0.00052021915,0.0023298496,0.02546506,0.014374382,0.002641448,0.0044869147,0.011804468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011696184,0.00039935487,0.00040966214,0.0037217138,0.04524012,0.0070914244,0.0033732075,0.0104889525,0.00073964766],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005961559,0.0000027036906,0.000277615,0.000015111332,0.0000023697664,0.00003869364,0.004099417,0.000058798316,0.00003856757,0.9769726,0.014365057,0.0041232225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027475991,0.000015732217,0.0030726495,0.00032973156,0.00002637391,0.00025895442,0.024325076,0.0006119971,0.0003002638,0.17243749,0.7984667,0.00012752306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9766714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9831934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13301334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13301334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1230654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96508384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2334211255","doi":"10.5235/108546812801228149","title":"The Incoherence of Judicial Review in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judicial Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Political science; Judicial opinion; Judicial activism; Law","score_opus":0.03762319479688505,"score_gpt":0.32732337396518735,"score_spread":0.2897001791683023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2334211255","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14044078,0.0642982,0.003089977,0.5621472,0.0018482163,0.00021249926,0.0017324806,0.00013393977,0.22609673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9286272,0.01471877,0.0013809932,0.029619688,0.00046864786,0.00007144762,0.00019181779,0.00007354442,0.024847941],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9636312,0.0040706825,0.001168398,0.0018343227,0.019351281,0.009944106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9231031,0.020494139,0.0049286555,0.0011156425,0.039974056,0.01038437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015431702,0.00027497404,0.0008387459,0.0041706404,0.030002847,0.01191606,0.0025225747,0.0042513176,0.00583397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06998363,0.00079379114,0.00047598744,0.009885357,0.012934236,0.0032190597,0.0045934473,0.00826261,0.00033038415],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015909088,0.000057986137,0.030021222,0.00044856532,0.00013927606,0.00074511615,0.01789788,0.0016861111,0.0003837876,0.5903961,0.2735827,0.08448212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022504343,0.00010938722,0.22200245,0.0017576875,0.0003030752,0.00035453905,0.019188264,0.0039826347,0.0011447439,0.08711526,0.6633521,0.00046490392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99556905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99826485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24985513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24985513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.470551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87006176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2335318655","doi":"10.1086/677057","title":"The Politics of Judicial Retirement in Canada and the United Kingdom","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Courts","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Supreme court; Kingdom; Political science; Test (biology); Law; Mandatory retirement; Demographic economics; Economics","score_opus":0.02627512220332856,"score_gpt":0.2725991933721596,"score_spread":0.24632407116883104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2335318655","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95053595,0.0023098758,0.00021145429,0.013343762,0.00007474557,0.000018588777,0.00039147952,0.000011170089,0.03310298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99685764,0.00030226965,0.000033571872,0.00039520627,0.000007658774,0.0000017691074,0.000041783936,0.0000028801567,0.0023573257],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99557835,0.0005431307,0.00008148378,0.00025062295,0.000819307,0.0027270222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852048,0.0024355708,0.0019108227,0.00035275662,0.0052320804,0.004863902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026744301,0.000101751524,0.0003215711,0.0019576615,0.010854206,0.004061204,0.0009293176,0.0011239846,0.0035579468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0113903945,0.00017499244,0.00020460793,0.002920874,0.0052800765,0.0006681,0.0018754882,0.0015838026,0.00017161769],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006372533,0.00011689532,0.64625096,0.00014161016,0.00010593748,0.0019375603,0.052935086,0.0033475186,0.0009270575,0.18563136,0.04598168,0.06198703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040036535,0.000046398745,0.83987975,0.00030983708,0.000042700933,0.00023180134,0.06486572,0.0016343718,0.00047865967,0.0039752563,0.08837617,0.0001193417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9836512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9938962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07860672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07860672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05673881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5703343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336064461","doi":"10.24926/19441992.600","title":"Teaching the Rule of Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of international law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Engineering, Michigan State University; Stanford Law School; Georgetown University; York University; George Washington University; Michigan State University; University of Minnesota; Yale University","keywords":"Rule of law; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.0201261584110371,"score_gpt":0.30868491608554094,"score_spread":0.28855875767450384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336064461","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009547793,0.027398586,0.017513543,0.4303634,0.0089372555,0.00004360566,0.000110751214,0.00016795416,0.50591713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5661201,0.036415968,0.018913746,0.10203038,0.009974917,0.00014285996,0.00019154734,0.00040547748,0.26580504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996232,0.0014836544,0.000113267444,0.00063198584,0.0010955463,0.0004435107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99409264,0.0033235396,0.00033446413,0.00045231375,0.00075259205,0.001044466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004975872,0.0004249077,0.00041571012,0.0008106708,0.0073520914,0.007616264,0.000992571,0.0035457502,0.01538601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015065763,0.00029256643,0.00034727278,0.0005363679,0.02127102,0.007782672,0.0027879595,0.01441655,0.0052356096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010898847,0.000096160395,0.000695913,0.000082683844,0.0000044497583,0.00009754428,0.006300369,0.00037560274,0.00018459193,0.71969056,0.20733394,0.06512733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007898097,0.000023460412,0.0004884285,0.00034968238,0.0000023355615,0.00009905558,0.0025269066,0.0003841562,0.00018753865,0.38162744,0.6142917,0.000011386999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009660727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016107831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01538601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072814566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009457761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052830875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336260986","doi":"10.7202/1035628ar","title":"A Consistent Inconsistency—An Interpretationof Sections 23 and 56(1) of the Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms of Québec","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Charter; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Statute; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Tribunal; Interpretation (philosophy); Common law; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0151438784145269,"score_gpt":0.25075418137452976,"score_spread":0.23561030296000285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336260986","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06509043,0.010441143,0.02663187,0.4298244,0.010117663,0.0002966469,0.0013323172,0.0003867194,0.45587876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57591736,0.0030670157,0.0109429285,0.1979425,0.0010132882,0.0002193042,0.0005006809,0.0002323777,0.2101645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98339766,0.0030940555,0.0006951192,0.002200094,0.007470058,0.0031429834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923644,0.0017557864,0.0007445572,0.00057570345,0.0042723124,0.0002872328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007035071,0.0006312049,0.000667769,0.0012999672,0.013321775,0.013729266,0.0036383383,0.008990368,0.004540888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010885449,0.0006435405,0.00079093926,0.002121274,0.013773979,0.002553237,0.0028633047,0.014122992,0.0007518633],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053868665,0.00003536859,0.0030156267,0.00009736455,0.000017595328,0.0007130361,0.015610523,0.00034801645,0.0010083129,0.8067666,0.15048037,0.021853244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036339254,0.00004810029,0.008824937,0.0008321478,0.00006388451,0.0003522106,0.0150222145,0.0013719007,0.002082552,0.06564764,0.90553147,0.0001865855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8179998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8690522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18200022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05443845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36614406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336613538","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511511035.020","title":"Legislatures as Constitutional Interpretation: Another Dialogue","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional interpretation; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.022267280956342554,"score_gpt":0.22858669998575276,"score_spread":0.2063194190294102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336613538","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008404635,0.038550243,0.012736736,0.1998555,0.0022477794,0.000027078846,0.00008679149,0.00009138919,0.7379998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.717771,0.030112883,0.008502858,0.059113752,0.0051344344,0.00021963514,0.0001559203,0.00037456056,0.17861506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99138933,0.0060617724,0.00010786673,0.0004142074,0.0014028501,0.0006239476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963038,0.0029747097,0.000092547154,0.00018284711,0.0003050431,0.00014112281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066662156,0.00054876396,0.00064548035,0.002297397,0.008082174,0.010797537,0.0018270382,0.0053832447,0.00720394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054378104,0.00034271547,0.00059195317,0.0026787666,0.037481375,0.0096909525,0.0033171885,0.010980587,0.00078880735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011235328,0.0000044870862,0.000009466164,0.000009302524,7.5924146e-7,0.000011690523,0.0022470092,0.000044301796,0.000023957104,0.991542,0.0048176893,0.001288247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013677993,0.000007058307,0.00014993317,0.00018277581,0.0000047325448,0.000031768577,0.004439908,0.0003361425,0.00011231457,0.56940365,0.4253077,0.000010379127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03713128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046340287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03713128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021157674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013232095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15351039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336865386","doi":"","title":"A 'Hard Core' Case against Judicial Review","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.12585944301690638,"score_gpt":0.34521050879876347,"score_spread":0.2193510657818571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336865386","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043447938,0.0019306835,0.010300321,0.45472944,0.0028884513,0.00019468143,0.00013625008,0.000089361376,0.4862829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7377278,0.0006105214,0.0036129858,0.19598223,0.0043098815,0.00039808507,0.000049358427,0.00016285694,0.057146266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9643151,0.013428005,0.001060119,0.0043899217,0.009781193,0.0070256507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89026856,0.0838293,0.0030984792,0.008442078,0.008587706,0.0057738493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04161116,0.0005597176,0.00188633,0.0040531848,0.016268903,0.017208228,0.004882365,0.0449736,0.013599992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13928464,0.0011306916,0.0011852579,0.0025241012,0.041467834,0.017007267,0.010392987,0.03504622,0.0017906841],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030645824,0.000021178079,0.00021876355,0.00002281959,0.000013865552,0.00019364989,0.0010247743,0.000049298964,0.00009175008,0.9675606,0.02732712,0.0034454747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010247664,0.000024762881,0.00076925015,0.00018975326,0.00003446409,0.00021311107,0.0011354485,0.0004787611,0.0004578048,0.9224302,0.074117765,0.00004627308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00887622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016156783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0449736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006547436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012766758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22006351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337162619","doi":"10.1093/icon/mow056","title":"The republican virtues of the “new commonwealth model of constitutionalism”","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Commonwealth; Democracy; Politics; Legislature; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Separation of powers; Sociology; Public administration; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03226949416544197,"score_gpt":0.3184463081912751,"score_spread":0.28617681402583317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337162619","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08127563,0.0017354179,0.08004325,0.068282105,0.00042472352,0.000072595896,0.00005519145,0.00008889309,0.7680222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98034567,0.00033576752,0.0039055091,0.0023044758,0.00021863462,0.00006336646,0.00001646052,0.000028030425,0.012782111],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914534,0.004303712,0.00019810737,0.0011255759,0.0020175122,0.00090168306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945281,0.0022584235,0.00052559224,0.0015003874,0.0007664582,0.0004209757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072472785,0.00015106959,0.00038883337,0.00093128055,0.00431047,0.0075325826,0.0010464207,0.0023128584,0.002690355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0106667625,0.00025520465,0.00050725107,0.0007374454,0.03797889,0.006653367,0.004479234,0.0051602744,0.00040399036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001903756,0.0000021475742,0.00007151229,0.0000020998393,9.0831827e-7,0.000005787407,0.0004734564,0.00008121732,0.000016844959,0.99842834,0.0003015406,0.0006142359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001309436,0.00001220631,0.00053981645,0.000023008315,0.0000048401985,0.000036228106,0.00040081432,0.0009124031,0.000105081126,0.9607347,0.037206873,0.000010960788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012532215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014250364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012532215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006510824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068188286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047239542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337861405","doi":"","title":"Review of Donald R. Songer, 'The Transformation of the Supreme Court of Canada: An Empirical Examination' (University of Toronto Press, 2008)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Normative; Law; Political science; Legitimacy; Perspective (graphical); Majority opinion; Politics","score_opus":0.018678862371328445,"score_gpt":0.2624736960644274,"score_spread":0.24379483369309896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337861405","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016361906,0.96804374,0.000078497425,0.01621376,0.0030506963,0.0000108420745,0.0004836628,0.000009717568,0.011945533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002753864,0.96977085,0.00012656771,0.011557015,0.0018272133,0.000021087422,0.00048623004,0.000020807069,0.013436457],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984445,0.00021861857,0.00010027661,0.00016905864,0.0008968268,0.0001707636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938167,0.0019207875,0.0003094901,0.00011552311,0.003475179,0.00036242788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013666748,0.0009680353,0.0013978872,0.0089131445,0.0024695976,0.0040376866,0.0016487867,0.0025023238,0.013156644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064162635,0.00057000347,0.00043242986,0.022084946,0.0025604677,0.0028644009,0.0013275709,0.00270747,0.00488608],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062104377,0.0000062984996,0.00015020577,0.0014384435,0.000010774811,0.00004011644,0.00028937106,0.00006569518,0.000030349449,0.0055030016,0.9547653,0.03769421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027454546,0.0000029006576,0.0017908863,0.002375906,0.000012047223,0.00005279544,0.00029109858,0.000014129943,0.000016555949,0.00056348334,0.9948683,0.0000090428275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5812645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74461967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4187355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027291676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03521765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84240305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338262209","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Law Meets Comparative Politics: Socio-Economic Rights and Political Realities (Chapter 10)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Dignity; Social rights; Welfare state; Fundamental rights; Politics; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04422301124317664,"score_gpt":0.300364009384181,"score_spread":0.2561409981410044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338262209","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017230539,0.09470786,0.013968116,0.15775569,0.0016207546,0.000047967133,0.00023214497,0.00003727261,0.71439964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89010614,0.034337066,0.0073163044,0.017889041,0.003989846,0.00022684566,0.00021579991,0.000083969004,0.045834925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922408,0.005917223,0.00012491575,0.0005114751,0.00075519277,0.0004503475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948966,0.004165258,0.00020800484,0.00032487247,0.00025848334,0.00014680665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005814557,0.0004141996,0.00046105176,0.0015914168,0.005115287,0.012217935,0.0008833185,0.0039416514,0.009871014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063151247,0.00030241758,0.00041025694,0.0024843283,0.045703482,0.013490216,0.0034642448,0.0053093215,0.000733677],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013858986,0.0000026999885,0.000040896397,0.000011083315,8.860586e-7,0.000010293767,0.0011092024,0.000028573846,0.000010883113,0.995895,0.0017389035,0.0011501542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004079287,0.0000062104073,0.00029942745,0.00013246512,0.0000015525352,0.00003385958,0.0020822417,0.00007575009,0.00003198178,0.9126112,0.08471658,0.000004673069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006402277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070487205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012217935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070979004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035734347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05149913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339527732","doi":"","title":"Les Droits Économiques Et Sociaux Dans Les Relations État–Particuliers Après Trente Ans D’Interprétation : Normes Juridiques Ou Énoncés Juridiques Symboliques? (Economic and Social Rights in the State-Individuals Relations after Thirty Years of Interpretation: Legal Norms or Symbolic Legal Statements)","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017546334607629645,"score_gpt":0.3071869279879842,"score_spread":0.2896405933803545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339527732","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2309725,0.012091763,0.006958854,0.12341255,0.0012628213,0.00006795581,0.00040682594,0.000074799595,0.62475187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9323935,0.0014748722,0.0007464014,0.0018991379,0.00018806395,0.000040287498,0.00006380055,0.000045715016,0.063148275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955277,0.002103912,0.00013921621,0.00041665343,0.001017314,0.00079530355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99488765,0.0017253355,0.00067374227,0.00036075726,0.0019222542,0.00043018485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060780924,0.0002898291,0.00028964787,0.001786312,0.012140677,0.011091082,0.0009054357,0.0021580984,0.0089237485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007740038,0.00021680768,0.00019742356,0.0022855927,0.03607512,0.005808204,0.0024462186,0.003948815,0.0008429495],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025435082,0.000011351365,0.0015891811,0.000026967606,0.0000039379015,0.00011969445,0.09365848,0.00011689375,0.0001668219,0.8844507,0.008866509,0.01096398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017175822,0.00003258556,0.030905738,0.00044318245,0.000012556193,0.00014385709,0.13305286,0.00047338047,0.0005862451,0.14546697,0.6887689,0.00009664004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49634016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5218907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49634016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030234182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02001839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9869023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339673233","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Litigation, the Adversarial System and Some of Its Adverse Effects","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Law; Supreme court; Common law; Political science; Impossibility; Obligation","score_opus":0.016434452626865926,"score_gpt":0.2615906456626325,"score_spread":0.24515619303576658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339673233","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0893226,0.025874656,0.025996063,0.27966478,0.0011561089,0.00014060308,0.00016444328,0.00015131595,0.5775295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96752286,0.0061516026,0.002017478,0.011749741,0.00061241933,0.000052762865,0.000021880625,0.000041690248,0.011829531],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832913,0.005024989,0.0003643931,0.0013523555,0.005779606,0.0041872454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832565,0.010150011,0.001589264,0.001361096,0.0028280162,0.0008150824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0120732775,0.00053790124,0.0005045381,0.0023654432,0.018438905,0.01350196,0.0034226454,0.005582696,0.0037554959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027760532,0.00037295293,0.0005186516,0.002739846,0.07069831,0.0067100674,0.007683629,0.009154908,0.00028474888],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000371541,0.0000043119408,0.00038721127,0.000015729434,0.0000055808537,0.00008588155,0.0019730823,0.00030964054,0.00003753684,0.9917031,0.0018427167,0.0036315399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019130457,0.000020223873,0.0034621942,0.00023529977,0.00003730952,0.00024115006,0.00870758,0.0011573079,0.0006611294,0.85667473,0.12871869,0.00006526037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5203366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4637351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5203366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032096002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028418988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96497643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340277123","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.12272","title":"The Environmental Revolution and the Supreme Court of Canada: Empirical Analysis of Postmaterialist Value Change Across Four Decades*","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of the Pacific","keywords":"Supreme court; Value (mathematics); Logistic regression; Law; Environmental change; Relevance (law); Political science; Economics; Climate change; Statistics","score_opus":0.030829361361166766,"score_gpt":0.30778938191153193,"score_spread":0.27696002055036517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2340277123","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9766718,0.0019427519,0.00009208239,0.0026861685,0.000022414204,0.00002392873,0.00038449102,0.0000044093363,0.01817193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972145,0.0006408834,0.000046038018,0.00019638252,0.000016529679,0.00000557886,0.00020474978,0.0000032052221,0.0016721137],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962541,0.00031438263,0.00009280893,0.00027734673,0.0018197491,0.0012415915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.979219,0.0042276317,0.004672051,0.00053476787,0.00790282,0.003443665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003500904,0.00011923532,0.00031767774,0.0042069177,0.008630463,0.004146025,0.0016844054,0.00108476,0.003689947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02038903,0.00021953938,0.00027104322,0.008125681,0.0051450753,0.0015896828,0.0021565198,0.002206389,0.00017691813],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013318846,0.0002678604,0.8677582,0.00009701908,0.00009271568,0.0005860521,0.048265275,0.0010092079,0.00037148606,0.02940512,0.008551269,0.043462615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070260517,0.000023017135,0.96732473,0.000095048745,0.000019072797,0.000055258963,0.016763436,0.0005477406,0.00013419804,0.0010514648,0.01395457,0.00002442586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98527217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9939569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06642459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06642459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06589242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4819464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340976075","doi":"","title":"NOT FOR RELEASE, PUBLICATION OR DISTRIBUTION, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, IN OR INTO AUSTRALIA, CANADA, JAPAN, SOUTH AFRICA, THE UNITED STATES OR ANY OTHER JURISDICTION WHERE IT IS UNLAWFUL TO DISTRIBUTE THIS ANNOUNCEMENT","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Distribution (mathematics); Geography; Political science; History; Law","score_opus":0.049983243728696496,"score_gpt":0.3038526702326011,"score_spread":0.2538694265039046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2340976075","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048597646,0.0010343522,0.0040367455,0.011980894,0.007389688,0.00045677408,0.0055315443,0.0018217124,0.96288854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032382295,0.0012370188,0.0018060056,0.0018808721,0.0007946008,0.00033625963,0.002507528,0.0008406547,0.9582149],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961474,0.0007329598,0.00025793922,0.00052647456,0.0016634087,0.00067177607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812112,0.0046895724,0.00084250484,0.0076345988,0.004112948,0.001509117],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034594678,0.00085323106,0.0016457676,0.0019402077,0.0054664584,0.01738222,0.002207058,0.00529577,0.4600338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03347187,0.0016248209,0.00120835,0.003917236,0.0054754172,0.005862308,0.0026237047,0.0054695234,0.4650419],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000565898,0.00021548595,0.0019332339,0.00051711354,0.00016546939,0.00037668901,0.00090598484,0.0003051798,0.008798315,0.11415706,0.7615852,0.11047438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009196381,0.00011020039,0.0018552227,0.00045537087,0.0000632146,0.00019922083,0.000796527,0.0004151438,0.0022652694,0.010704667,0.9829829,0.000060279883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013326615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020824067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5399662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035029044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010221507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7701962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341109914","doi":"","title":"Review of Flemming, Tournament of Appeals: Granting Judicial Review in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Justice System Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tournament; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02543149587765181,"score_gpt":0.29593373684636304,"score_spread":0.2705022409687112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341109914","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030172732,0.7158278,0.0006335767,0.18897694,0.00902786,0.00060173543,0.0033290987,0.00012960407,0.051300637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4073926,0.46815926,0.0034157329,0.09173461,0.0066964463,0.0005962435,0.0025135225,0.00018367756,0.019307954],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96027565,0.0065097087,0.0042975266,0.0024826876,0.01919338,0.007241047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7453329,0.066435665,0.010219116,0.0041130953,0.15542458,0.018474553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048434198,0.00078929187,0.0026960813,0.012615722,0.010751171,0.012740725,0.00898297,0.0074270195,0.006142902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18486348,0.001210582,0.0014792843,0.021811396,0.008139651,0.002436896,0.0030439545,0.006921427,0.00043621397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007454905,0.00016353825,0.013489846,0.01638547,0.0007945784,0.0003424666,0.0038589453,0.0011288272,0.000325937,0.039977506,0.61051774,0.3122696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005633779,0.00019617472,0.10218041,0.024733886,0.0018276046,0.00024956866,0.0036915897,0.0007251743,0.0004736049,0.003891054,0.86117214,0.00029548394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9880091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22607689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22607689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.54845244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8976411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344266823","doi":"10.5040/9781472559555.ch-005","title":"‘Alert, alive and sensitive’: Baker, the Duty to Give Reasons, and the Ethos of Justification in Canadian Public Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Duty; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.038245170695469725,"score_gpt":0.25317425682789657,"score_spread":0.21492908613242684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344266823","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0144836195,0.04398517,0.003115317,0.09212989,0.0012132764,0.000054597615,0.00010398056,0.000054537773,0.84485966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6833311,0.024740791,0.0033574367,0.017964099,0.0005627318,0.000067257264,0.00012460978,0.0001260594,0.26972586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966775,0.00068303134,0.00004472149,0.00019937663,0.0016541873,0.00074113085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985668,0.000627147,0.00006118493,0.00004930076,0.00053828344,0.00015726716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022089288,0.00049466785,0.00034236032,0.0022204912,0.014454903,0.009941623,0.001479561,0.0035039645,0.005167692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00447788,0.00036047713,0.00021403117,0.0034180684,0.03232926,0.0049450356,0.0017642397,0.0049905665,0.000590517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030606948,0.000005185892,0.00010252778,0.00003445726,9.972849e-7,0.00004683216,0.011248411,0.00006327587,0.000038775936,0.9529576,0.027716978,0.007781937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007063276,0.000007377217,0.0016421231,0.00031816724,0.000007667815,0.0000993115,0.016785681,0.00025649526,0.000109024084,0.21078654,0.76994324,0.0000372637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93410015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9667496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.091482945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.091482945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08541302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66375834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344632045","doi":"10.14288/1.0066683","title":"Doing provincial constitutions differently : codifying responsible government in the era of executive dominance","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dominance (genetics); Government (linguistics); Political science; Public administration; Business","score_opus":0.01619889631510298,"score_gpt":0.2098233913933695,"score_spread":0.1936244950782665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344632045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4402533,0.0035169653,0.017152607,0.040923502,0.00043131644,0.00015484994,0.00015327435,0.000107964835,0.49730635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98300374,0.0006856011,0.0026958352,0.0012697987,0.000039039995,0.000022169012,0.000048394704,0.000026914166,0.0122085195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.987812,0.0030854167,0.000468467,0.0010108779,0.003948285,0.0036750906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869468,0.0047506224,0.0011461327,0.0018236962,0.004210751,0.0011218464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011518753,0.0002053663,0.00036263364,0.002472983,0.021113694,0.011855204,0.0015021603,0.0017773346,0.0021484953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03026063,0.0003183757,0.00030560084,0.004027978,0.021368878,0.006763944,0.0052869106,0.004171942,0.0001843267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017920725,0.000017601447,0.0067938277,0.000039939303,0.0000121630155,0.0003899075,0.084148,0.0009311192,0.00041339564,0.8646734,0.004416963,0.03814582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005652917,0.000043502474,0.040575515,0.0005269247,0.00007896701,0.00026983122,0.09491628,0.003383814,0.0016795322,0.26427668,0.5940269,0.00016549788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87213296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92931926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93183935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.068160675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1272113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49454266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344845538","doi":"","title":"Remedies for Discriminatory Profiling","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Racial profiling; Profiling (computer programming); Legislature; Damages; Enforcement; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.023342375266797614,"score_gpt":0.31244716812556683,"score_spread":0.2891047928587692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344845538","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033661623,0.012513035,0.2110754,0.19645803,0.0077513806,0.0015724301,0.00043842144,0.0017326003,0.53479713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68799305,0.0053630993,0.08833116,0.06490897,0.002600955,0.001020979,0.00037940714,0.0004820618,0.14892033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9708862,0.004945789,0.0020070649,0.0040820953,0.014052648,0.0040262393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9739671,0.006782317,0.0030605842,0.0070188344,0.0072155707,0.0019557555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01687934,0.001416087,0.0010129092,0.0038333153,0.007565403,0.005920466,0.0049008876,0.010828384,0.023474896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0578724,0.00068720774,0.0016739292,0.0013729603,0.013931642,0.0071653863,0.009345651,0.012952578,0.003215619],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045720928,0.0001931112,0.0012539194,0.0003139803,0.000046880625,0.0004746779,0.0015196755,0.0017711851,0.0015004653,0.90116674,0.03409546,0.05761806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014024107,0.00024562282,0.0033820411,0.0015788275,0.00011965314,0.00078655774,0.0016685548,0.003682163,0.0029393241,0.5615288,0.4237709,0.0001573561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0120432675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01348793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023474896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0078416895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01854377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08926755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345260285","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.2014.e33","title":"What Do Meaningful Consequences and Fair and Proportionate Accountability Mean to Youth Offered Extrajudicial Sanctions in Ontario?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Brock University; Centennial College","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Accountability; Economic Justice; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Exploratory research; Perception; Criminology; Criminal justice; Public relations; Process (computing); Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.13621275310942998,"score_gpt":0.3201981316282285,"score_spread":0.18398537851879854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345260285","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9882377,0.00027398238,0.00008611237,0.0044264626,0.00002708876,0.000021960024,0.000058439226,0.0000032523737,0.0068649896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997968,0.00026595982,0.000054035798,0.00028684747,0.000006864301,0.000008581711,0.000019462035,0.0000028302527,0.0013873307],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99505603,0.0010347699,0.00018385814,0.00026523182,0.0014663957,0.0019937686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932428,0.00086825993,0.0018069224,0.00010074993,0.0013810946,0.0026002119],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029478131,0.00016706517,0.00037370122,0.00066534587,0.01222049,0.004800572,0.0010406942,0.0008360334,0.0022547536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009094877,0.0002912895,0.0003024499,0.0013172934,0.0072755264,0.0015704683,0.0026015316,0.0017564931,0.00012858697],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008171184,0.000120113895,0.31881207,0.0001511231,0.000017753979,0.0010921148,0.64816195,0.00006828309,0.0008090816,0.0060800877,0.0037013374,0.02090431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067153273,0.00007244017,0.37134302,0.00016985778,0.000016392203,0.00014341883,0.61396223,0.00009084283,0.00018960123,0.0005339985,0.013443847,0.000027644743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9495837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9847327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057253063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057253063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053192377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.415402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345497868","doi":"","title":"Exporting U.S. Counter-Interpretation: Redeeming Constitutional Supremacy in the U.K.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Parliamentary sovereignty; Political science; Constitution; Judicial review; Separation of powers; Constitutional review; Democracy; Popular sovereignty; Legislature; Sovereignty; Politics","score_opus":0.016088925947602913,"score_gpt":0.2934452861968933,"score_spread":0.2773563602492904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345497868","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30477756,0.011557269,0.020728378,0.14375842,0.0014143583,0.00013429875,0.00014706656,0.00018507369,0.51729757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9760627,0.0014026277,0.0028973692,0.01127408,0.00013522341,0.00005133834,0.000017264596,0.00004349319,0.008115941],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9813395,0.012524737,0.0011664089,0.001664081,0.0017765439,0.0015286217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.953274,0.031013304,0.005034364,0.00546002,0.004712091,0.00050626736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0149475,0.0001975533,0.00045170166,0.0009850665,0.0066264323,0.013271246,0.0008583582,0.0053812056,0.0018576389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057249486,0.00046553978,0.00035555183,0.0013694057,0.012754557,0.0069595403,0.004820428,0.0062756687,0.00058041053],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006503822,0.0000133607355,0.0017319676,0.000075250064,0.000014632309,0.00031775504,0.016810548,0.000313163,0.0005057196,0.95400286,0.0092097735,0.016940061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014997278,0.0001730488,0.012656728,0.00072212465,0.00016433536,0.0011196748,0.014089789,0.0043677883,0.0067749317,0.5099168,0.44962612,0.00023868735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037797924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048742007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037797924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011473236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010855297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08324456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346217348","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-121x.2004.tb00251.x","title":"Judges and politics: an essay from Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law; Supreme court; Government (linguistics); Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029224881557690305,"score_gpt":0.2996854901820406,"score_spread":0.2704606086243503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346217348","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0060487655,0.21038789,0.00034794482,0.5530874,0.0071427696,0.000053579253,0.00037008736,0.000026837535,0.22253473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.247918,0.1701553,0.0010183996,0.22720005,0.00354605,0.00017349914,0.00028599857,0.00022088055,0.34948185],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948277,0.0007416046,0.00012245038,0.00046268626,0.0021171588,0.0017283818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950197,0.001994721,0.00014040564,0.00009698356,0.0019030437,0.00084515614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003208968,0.0007255117,0.0007509052,0.0029063523,0.043865323,0.015260377,0.0024860697,0.011058761,0.0075136316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009584711,0.00080098753,0.00043405933,0.0075480305,0.019404663,0.0048354454,0.0026830814,0.009795468,0.0010275494],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020116926,0.000024389094,0.00091665797,0.00020042196,0.000009396218,0.00032188726,0.015168713,0.00020920238,0.00012356191,0.28186306,0.6874425,0.013700119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013915973,0.0000037457692,0.0028761486,0.00063049805,0.000007856859,0.00006118161,0.0108181415,0.00007406823,0.000063166655,0.01450342,0.97091424,0.00003349139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.983227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9929669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8130157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18698429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18537763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.942983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2350929018","doi":"","title":"A Comparative Study on the Federal Judicial Systems of the U.S.A and Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of China University of Geosciences(Social Sciences Edition)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Federalism; Judicial review; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.02887351365440918,"score_gpt":0.2601874922803068,"score_spread":0.23131397862589761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2350929018","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87117785,0.004996809,0.00035454583,0.0055902107,0.00006151554,0.00006818377,0.0011517644,0.00001928604,0.11657989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99517304,0.0011934326,0.00015521263,0.00025770906,0.0000093750195,0.000008811425,0.0002122266,0.000003333734,0.002987015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99403715,0.00061952893,0.00014601897,0.00032047232,0.0021512818,0.002725488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99194133,0.00088159635,0.0007607834,0.00017131036,0.004994824,0.0012501526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018929726,0.00022148692,0.0004256001,0.0067873476,0.010226989,0.0041858577,0.0010150007,0.00077070366,0.004869977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008933229,0.00022283643,0.0003361579,0.012964929,0.004735899,0.0009851955,0.0015074407,0.0012678433,0.00019379251],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041136114,0.00013317027,0.26766348,0.00043754478,0.00029357552,0.001243393,0.052690092,0.0033100531,0.0021012586,0.5192142,0.03416388,0.11833795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005011521,0.00008359248,0.8623507,0.00033225227,0.00018226387,0.00022550326,0.051606648,0.0013093989,0.00062446366,0.0054002977,0.07771821,0.000116610616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9894174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9968079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07775059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07775059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10212832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5641227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2357867310","doi":"","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada in the Twenty-First Century","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Charter; Legitimacy; Original jurisdiction; Institution; Legislature; Certiorari; Statutory interpretation; Tribunal","score_opus":0.00981025391046497,"score_gpt":0.24125731973537992,"score_spread":0.23144706582491495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2357867310","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041334346,0.18925649,0.0021132526,0.273489,0.005419056,0.000052009185,0.00065805396,0.000111348956,0.4875665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7467884,0.05744952,0.0018769385,0.045315284,0.0015687988,0.000038754133,0.00026992918,0.00008491872,0.14660747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941958,0.0006508579,0.00012055413,0.00057962385,0.0025989837,0.0018542011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99310815,0.0009611237,0.00024763794,0.00014960486,0.0039149704,0.0016184684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033206614,0.0003699693,0.0004276822,0.0030202428,0.022306534,0.014569257,0.0015624654,0.0047409884,0.00441076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011258141,0.0003752493,0.00026869387,0.004555588,0.018992566,0.0030874603,0.002064564,0.004608378,0.00038479356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017441233,0.000009894414,0.0015907602,0.00006295149,0.000011012832,0.00021710698,0.005518124,0.000360443,0.000100393496,0.88304687,0.08333521,0.025729908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009153377,0.000007814244,0.00495448,0.00032091988,0.000012956701,0.00007634286,0.0024058504,0.00021239748,0.000107359156,0.026123114,0.9657246,0.00004504521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9912145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1992729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1992729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27488637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92872995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2368594978","doi":"10.1093/icon/mov048","title":"Proportionality and Constitutional Culture","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Political science; Law","score_opus":0.049977583296387545,"score_gpt":0.3510176951362327,"score_spread":0.30104011183984514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2368594978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17323028,0.0011134272,0.010574027,0.00958469,0.00017483374,0.000048626356,0.00005798406,0.000034331886,0.8051819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99204165,0.00011293783,0.00053722825,0.0003002055,0.000043414202,0.000020142592,0.000009588507,0.000014896603,0.0069198483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.991319,0.0049229725,0.00038626703,0.0014404133,0.0011020149,0.000829358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844796,0.008360553,0.001427751,0.002450166,0.002221687,0.0010601496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008662176,0.0002776609,0.0004624318,0.0020552003,0.008026719,0.008415186,0.0011386501,0.0012452377,0.010309657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027779797,0.00031679854,0.00024679882,0.002132068,0.031207228,0.006456518,0.004347108,0.00459834,0.0005350117],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048989295,0.000009512831,0.00034446717,0.0000048748348,0.0000033354156,0.000009089187,0.0033759512,0.000042150765,0.000040033712,0.9936271,0.00027552168,0.0022630948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016507296,0.000021411795,0.0014783202,0.000031292977,0.000012800366,0.00005491219,0.005060804,0.0003304852,0.000301418,0.9685119,0.02416506,0.00001505672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049793697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004852241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010309657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034752456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027987636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04581052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W237856110","doi":"","title":"It's All in the Game: A Nonfoundationalist Account of Law and Adjudication by Allan C. Hutchinson (review)","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Law; Mathematical economics; Law and economics; Philosophy; History; Sociology; Mathematics; Political science","score_opus":0.022044596727169418,"score_gpt":0.27809984534548005,"score_spread":0.25605524861831064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W237856110","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025271118,0.89567214,0.00043305074,0.09813549,0.000983783,0.0000034190841,0.000022820028,0.0000048877714,0.0044916347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01205498,0.9571719,0.00042094497,0.02498691,0.0024678803,0.000019080588,0.000030374167,0.000016932845,0.0028309897],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99676764,0.0018508092,0.00012031432,0.00021446892,0.0008494962,0.00019723069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861055,0.011167486,0.00047686507,0.00026274507,0.001684713,0.0003026624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007166917,0.0004109369,0.0010184898,0.00220224,0.0019099142,0.00545135,0.0016899859,0.004193824,0.0027787492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0137637025,0.00040088556,0.0004141953,0.004635217,0.009706744,0.00905999,0.0014104176,0.0044845855,0.0011159882],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037893595,0.000024980776,0.00044727835,0.0017607545,0.00005972972,0.00008758583,0.0008983561,0.000455146,0.00004553376,0.2988964,0.5464537,0.1508326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000310054,0.000027027661,0.0018422005,0.005251172,0.00005399888,0.0002125945,0.0009465058,0.00027935,0.00008003718,0.17085502,0.8203843,0.000036759968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0388631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09403052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0388631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077721328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016757103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077273786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2385483180","doi":"","title":"Study of Canadian Judicial Review","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Parliament; Appeal; Constitution; Judicial activism; Law; Political science; Constitutional theory; Politics","score_opus":0.06829207427028373,"score_gpt":0.3323798138437884,"score_spread":0.2640877395735047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2385483180","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09687663,0.038957167,0.0012238157,0.055817153,0.00094896543,0.00037111447,0.0032976973,0.0000858531,0.8024216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8909267,0.029165503,0.0014528921,0.008531087,0.0004597515,0.00018824401,0.001033317,0.00008855526,0.06815396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.981105,0.0022317069,0.0005493955,0.0014430848,0.01094854,0.0037222188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.935034,0.014833581,0.0037577972,0.001242122,0.03960301,0.0055295415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007150649,0.00044154475,0.00071723753,0.018177833,0.021602917,0.011864933,0.0023798156,0.0022198786,0.012598888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055648647,0.00048182992,0.00048337632,0.0327222,0.007736709,0.0030103992,0.002207789,0.0031002231,0.0007562956],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004695235,0.000043168737,0.015317065,0.00053391774,0.000046249646,0.00048109566,0.021387149,0.00055653177,0.00017430595,0.7818982,0.12935759,0.050157864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018962623,0.000025705975,0.077873535,0.000835897,0.0000606237,0.00032181642,0.018172383,0.0008478148,0.00023188081,0.0124136275,0.8890898,0.00010784426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98593056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9895419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23132621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23132621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28853068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8915526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2387780781","doi":"10.21991/c9qh45","title":"Distant Echoes: Discussing Judicial Activism at Canadian and American Supreme Court Nomination Hearings","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nomination; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Judicial activism; Supreme Court Decisions; Judicial review","score_opus":0.01779949315408676,"score_gpt":0.26522840769486056,"score_spread":0.2474289145407738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2387780781","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.325674,0.008790035,0.0011790927,0.28131998,0.005077818,0.00008284501,0.0004963287,0.00007600248,0.37730393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94037473,0.0018317093,0.0003445008,0.03160026,0.00077845494,0.000025466488,0.00008874076,0.000053053438,0.024903085],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860282,0.0028269512,0.0002525939,0.00094991707,0.0054314644,0.0045108707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9749053,0.014140715,0.0008791091,0.00035166187,0.006347118,0.0033761328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009833198,0.00051233335,0.00045272845,0.004340535,0.06250958,0.01572273,0.0032661902,0.008504774,0.007362933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027782476,0.00041209452,0.0004892293,0.0066188253,0.015372435,0.0036535575,0.003989486,0.00914583,0.0003619627],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011343689,0.000061824314,0.013183678,0.00023707414,0.00003247741,0.002017786,0.69233763,0.00023419499,0.0011575386,0.12279054,0.1428482,0.024985636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011025811,0.000028458797,0.021776732,0.00029655115,0.000031097818,0.00012281445,0.5305049,0.00014299281,0.00044557906,0.0022526102,0.44425848,0.00012879512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9748043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9925811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11272696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11272696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07709781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8178952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2391225639","doi":"","title":"Distinctive Canadian Constitutional Law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Legal Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Sovereign immunity; Monarchy; Law of the land; Law; Sovereignty; Independence (probability theory); Political science; Colonialism; Limited government; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03735897709457897,"score_gpt":0.2930902631015614,"score_spread":0.2557312860069824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2391225639","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018630723,0.0035757136,0.0017684799,0.017194076,0.00041561303,0.000090430054,0.00074637396,0.00008262335,0.95749587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69870245,0.005308659,0.0049705002,0.0073131085,0.00021348444,0.00010675775,0.00074740354,0.00007893714,0.2825587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99702924,0.00022460341,0.000072833674,0.00054125313,0.001357716,0.0007744448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99731535,0.00042798315,0.00010630731,0.00017163504,0.0015901229,0.00038861833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015598907,0.0003707973,0.00025438913,0.0029402312,0.016429434,0.0074164774,0.0009117241,0.0015584633,0.0100079095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005428158,0.00024106106,0.0002276542,0.0035647866,0.010816678,0.0013470954,0.0017392765,0.0031162999,0.00062035135],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023317684,0.0000023112011,0.00038127188,0.00001648475,0.0000016007085,0.000054149437,0.0016240666,0.00008109614,0.00011445052,0.9719027,0.018626384,0.007193092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000081444205,0.0000052874184,0.007092779,0.00008952872,0.00001576176,0.00009539949,0.0017837979,0.00035728494,0.00020568102,0.049966045,0.9403439,0.000036361995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9762683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98918694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09926466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09926466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.113716476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7202189},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2404729571","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x16000234","title":"Just the Facts? Media Coverage of Female and Male High Court Appointees in Five Democracies","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Media coverage; Political science; Variation (astronomy); News media; Law; Sociology; Media studies","score_opus":0.05281048631499318,"score_gpt":0.3021888606153184,"score_spread":0.24937837430032522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2404729571","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9872503,0.00054309244,0.000049851176,0.00045262647,0.00002144496,0.0000057922234,0.0011023933,0.0000045084676,0.010569948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974534,0.0005420169,0.00005559568,0.00007194073,0.000057434812,0.0000075372,0.00042012575,0.000004125962,0.0013878443],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951744,0.0001704792,0.000037263417,0.00005304449,0.00011481104,0.00010691252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957064,0.0014693686,0.0019468534,0.000105188396,0.00045394455,0.0003183256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006378052,0.000119402815,0.00019658935,0.0034481187,0.0006422392,0.0012238759,0.0001398806,0.0002113158,0.003647165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040233606,0.0001033551,0.00011683397,0.003009519,0.00036479297,0.0006348605,0.0006022889,0.0003258301,0.0003726155],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023273607,0.000069338814,0.92135215,0.00018082531,0.00008375416,0.00041132164,0.031750906,0.00010610554,0.0017958443,0.0015266795,0.004227239,0.038263038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027355509,0.00002927445,0.9711779,0.00007741855,0.00001911157,0.00015592141,0.019834759,0.00013299109,0.00039238657,0.00008061042,0.008086894,0.000009983667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021164611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043817647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021164611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005813642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022861565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042082787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2408831168","doi":"","title":"Electoral Management Bodies as a Fourth Branch of Government","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Constitution; Political science; Government (linguistics); Legislature; Law; Separation of powers; Norm (philosophy); Public administration","score_opus":0.010023022971387808,"score_gpt":0.26080078757862507,"score_spread":0.2507777646072373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2408831168","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20823742,0.0014313816,0.040312223,0.01319857,0.0003910777,0.00014567976,0.00006783777,0.00022710988,0.7359888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9601992,0.00029639376,0.007898634,0.0007801239,0.000119093216,0.00012598056,0.000041204956,0.000037926926,0.030501474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880014,0.0070602535,0.0004461719,0.001344591,0.0015713657,0.0015762525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947607,0.0017574767,0.0008743684,0.0014446134,0.0005163795,0.000646484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006195896,0.00021457979,0.0003411846,0.0019193526,0.0056498325,0.010950024,0.0010103331,0.00244561,0.0051919906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065276837,0.00043983117,0.0004394961,0.0016460185,0.022368869,0.0051280623,0.005046403,0.0032958589,0.00090386264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000678669,0.000008668926,0.00064845756,0.0000118725775,0.000002270834,0.000022493416,0.0020262066,0.00016966661,0.00015750607,0.989906,0.0006938316,0.0063461973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051371127,0.00018874112,0.0062525487,0.00025911842,0.000028406976,0.00025662527,0.006828968,0.0018444333,0.0016144699,0.5163115,0.46631125,0.000052546744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022361744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034619723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010950024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053535346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068207206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038842857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2409954246","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2785017","title":"Is Rule of Law an Equilibrium Without Private Ordering?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vector Institute; Royal Ontario Museum; Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Private law; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Public law","score_opus":0.019725075020541685,"score_gpt":0.29730199848488903,"score_spread":0.27757692346434737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2409954246","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27757844,0.00061173504,0.1266788,0.047316592,0.0005615835,0.00026294318,0.0012078327,0.00031280532,0.5454692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.970485,0.000244025,0.0077477866,0.0016676327,0.0003026237,0.00012884721,0.00012904988,0.000056732937,0.019238368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902406,0.0031943729,0.0004900393,0.0020078165,0.0016708946,0.002396318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97857934,0.010463278,0.0024238043,0.0046860413,0.00240477,0.0014428593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070191734,0.0004655092,0.0023903924,0.0018081443,0.004115939,0.011145921,0.002636003,0.006894478,0.023764437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03004531,0.0007045735,0.0013049721,0.0021165502,0.011038398,0.0144192,0.002690195,0.0047356836,0.0030130781],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020510917,0.00002311693,0.00015869172,0.0000133236135,0.000009250993,0.000024263167,0.00008293433,0.00029267598,0.00005518741,0.99682707,0.00091374014,0.0015791116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021732292,0.0000064574924,0.000095575495,0.000004876352,0.0000041130725,0.000021351132,0.000104733575,0.00088873896,0.00003912037,0.99785113,0.0009563769,0.0000059312406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004022566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036363774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023764437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003394623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045992546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07949996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2414974256","doi":"","title":"Theorizing Legal Mobilization","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"22nd International Conference of Europeanists","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Mobilization; Political science; Law and economics; Political economy; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.12406322628256536,"score_gpt":0.34436253063683836,"score_spread":0.220299304354273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2414974256","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018687729,0.004086124,0.021403847,0.05985476,0.0007218995,0.00006479756,0.00007620325,0.000059401227,0.8950453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9084248,0.00150562,0.005168725,0.008153949,0.00069365796,0.00030776628,0.00009103239,0.00011961144,0.075534895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952956,0.0027502056,0.00009600487,0.0006225365,0.00057152356,0.000664139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996635,0.002423878,0.00014862935,0.00041859612,0.00022203567,0.0001518949],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006072515,0.00080470025,0.00076868874,0.0035683115,0.008525241,0.010394149,0.002094864,0.008919646,0.021680497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011019212,0.00043647044,0.00087686157,0.0025230523,0.044801578,0.011800407,0.0067032157,0.006415674,0.0014364956],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.9629584e-7,0.0000027781537,0.000010195184,0.0000031054497,5.637749e-7,0.000004133413,0.00032844505,0.000024800147,0.0000036679917,0.9985411,0.000719967,0.000360466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055568858,0.0000017805409,0.00002478028,0.00003051089,0.0000022326426,0.0000059269064,0.0005205439,0.000099417826,0.000024170791,0.98465306,0.014630487,0.0000016170102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033116655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003573737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021680497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006017795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049008783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07252854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2427534200","doi":"","title":"Judicial Justices of the Peace and Judicial Independence in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial independence; Judicial discretion; Political science; Judicial activism; Independence (probability theory); Law; Judicial opinion; Judicial review; Supreme court","score_opus":0.017159913701367168,"score_gpt":0.257490429631226,"score_spread":0.24033051592985882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2427534200","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6524043,0.0039813886,0.0005189907,0.06832754,0.0003886842,0.000103815066,0.0007206286,0.000023109926,0.27353153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807051,0.00072880246,0.000096408534,0.0024774086,0.00005002935,0.00001888903,0.0000634802,0.000012550508,0.01584726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9836125,0.0016162415,0.00031455397,0.0009635229,0.0035050628,0.009988133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9782178,0.0070221676,0.0016449748,0.00048539694,0.007902365,0.004727314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006056609,0.00032833876,0.001194214,0.003303,0.055145,0.013684953,0.0033115665,0.0059152925,0.011379017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03816693,0.0006484425,0.00056485477,0.006730569,0.01565788,0.0036000127,0.0050075916,0.01369414,0.000429034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030979098,0.0002512434,0.032729905,0.00012525583,0.00012673979,0.00087933626,0.075625286,0.0019581316,0.0003482572,0.8044741,0.05773086,0.025441088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028392952,0.0001428986,0.27735418,0.0007794082,0.00031574888,0.00030448046,0.23879084,0.00351969,0.0012152059,0.11729495,0.35948634,0.0005122982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99698514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7870758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21292418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.348534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9128964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W243986444","doi":"","title":"Democracy and Deference: The Role of Social Science Evidence in Election Law Cases","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Supreme court; Deference; Skepticism; Parliament; Politics","score_opus":0.02607675616260652,"score_gpt":0.28192224417869344,"score_spread":0.2558454880160869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W243986444","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34471694,0.014671716,0.0145289805,0.20494272,0.00077908183,0.00020677387,0.0002488063,0.00004818535,0.41985676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940078,0.0011420295,0.00074630027,0.0017848347,0.000298788,0.00006355245,0.00002402156,0.000009367311,0.0019231963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93386847,0.047806803,0.0022589003,0.0028946477,0.006507103,0.006664083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3947251,0.5696017,0.01447352,0.0061887987,0.010168788,0.0048421],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.083973065,0.00055988005,0.0016617846,0.012475492,0.01043163,0.019581761,0.004021565,0.011420294,0.016039439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32256734,0.00091692945,0.0014334898,0.007344787,0.03698102,0.026772222,0.011526488,0.01066151,0.0005216885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011005485,0.00008924948,0.013459786,0.00023072325,0.00007923189,0.0016335379,0.012948841,0.000568038,0.00004636251,0.9553366,0.0031806577,0.012316864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015256567,0.00010305581,0.013225829,0.0013605593,0.00016278941,0.0007350139,0.030743461,0.0051438035,0.00027480867,0.924772,0.02324742,0.00007869429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013988899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016198592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.083973065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010830069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011398624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44409734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2441399703","doi":"10.1017/9781316875056.009","title":"Two Conceptions of Pluralist Jurisprudence","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Content (measure theory); Political science; Law; Computer science; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04903365023970794,"score_gpt":0.2795815063435999,"score_spread":0.23054785610389197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2441399703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010148353,0.005891457,0.033867676,0.03036352,0.00053190143,0.000039701175,0.000057872832,0.000052916,0.9190466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8389016,0.0032687408,0.018789692,0.0051270262,0.0008486683,0.00027182273,0.00010364722,0.0001596329,0.13252923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911877,0.0042039105,0.00021713106,0.0008777951,0.0028154466,0.0006979574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947248,0.0030459014,0.0002718416,0.0009540295,0.00062694005,0.00037657158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007680532,0.0005677706,0.0007163563,0.0019348641,0.0052587665,0.011301168,0.001990564,0.0047373,0.006726423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0098233465,0.00052234676,0.00061888975,0.0017968392,0.041861102,0.009350425,0.0048261685,0.008156561,0.0011362995],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.8932205e-7,0.000001719482,0.0000064323567,0.0000027604312,2.3317001e-7,0.000003929914,0.0007210479,0.000015582247,0.00000636199,0.9982351,0.0004887281,0.00051728217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006589778,0.000003370872,0.000069396825,0.00004545932,0.0000014624949,0.000031107564,0.0007883687,0.0002045692,0.00004611927,0.9662144,0.032585107,0.000004047825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026162746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003626584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011301168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008353124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041303947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06060648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2460207295","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511550881.009","title":"THE CONCEPTUAL MODEL: WHAT'S THE OBJECT?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptual model; Computer science; Object (grammar); Artificial intelligence; Database","score_opus":0.0356043380166251,"score_gpt":0.2266031526015464,"score_spread":0.1909988145849213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2460207295","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006404093,0.022227429,0.056644388,0.14586571,0.0022128492,0.00008029974,0.00045125614,0.00020181692,0.7659122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74184775,0.038142387,0.041095387,0.017887004,0.0032326737,0.0006632313,0.0012902166,0.00071306434,0.15512821],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968346,0.0019465933,0.000071458,0.00023927046,0.00074785046,0.00016029734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997271,0.0014100692,0.00015723573,0.00048833236,0.00045883906,0.00021438845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045673666,0.0006973885,0.00075301406,0.0020033866,0.0023258652,0.0131730605,0.001960505,0.002446365,0.013287434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009160434,0.0003935765,0.0004879757,0.0046890895,0.018378286,0.020941371,0.0017358714,0.0050781476,0.0028218117],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021614442,0.000005170887,0.000035610694,0.0000398348,0.0000015052532,0.0000119333,0.0008278049,0.00003540346,0.00001636088,0.9873361,0.0070055644,0.0046825716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070531887,0.00000701698,0.0001921483,0.00043807094,0.0000060848693,0.00007016053,0.0035809162,0.000502151,0.00006299612,0.880698,0.11442705,0.000008372076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067988453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005471446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013287434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062566744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005147407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045395553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2462566515","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Inconsistency in Legislation – Interpretation, Remedies and the Ambiguous Role of Ambiguity","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Legislation; Constitution; Charter; Supreme court; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Legislature; Law; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Judicial interpretation; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.007734817367694564,"score_gpt":0.25147274723216234,"score_spread":0.24373792986446777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2462566515","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18663104,0.012148013,0.10883865,0.17618918,0.0010165112,0.00024987067,0.00012549144,0.00018641105,0.5146148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98172426,0.00094988715,0.009110928,0.004072505,0.00028959953,0.00006966938,0.000024421575,0.000053901775,0.0037048217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9509827,0.023946181,0.0025831864,0.0036225286,0.015233251,0.0036321853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9638006,0.022763366,0.0036157826,0.0047724824,0.0043703765,0.0006773592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03631619,0.0004869565,0.0011694607,0.0033379921,0.01302448,0.0138361845,0.003430908,0.00647586,0.0018701988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059599217,0.0008249348,0.0009900974,0.0025497384,0.117867604,0.014787638,0.008074084,0.012268646,0.00018989459],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037999698,0.000005205865,0.0002135507,0.000014241186,0.0000039161923,0.00006821306,0.005515608,0.00016467065,0.00006687138,0.99079496,0.00031222994,0.0028366733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024390583,0.000012068999,0.0008933016,0.00019031519,0.000021306638,0.00011012412,0.0047148247,0.0006310606,0.00031072527,0.9715253,0.021532955,0.000033653097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05638342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05950965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05638342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020457381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027838208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19206065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2465136185","doi":"10.7202/1036578ar","title":"La Cour suprême du Canada et la pluralité démotique de l’État canadien. Des traces de consociationalisme dans la jurisprudence constitutionnelle","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Jurisprudence; Political science; Philosophy; Ethnology; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.010261337322330718,"score_gpt":0.2452591943366253,"score_spread":0.23499785701429457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2465136185","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033773992,0.0100179855,0.0064643486,0.050890308,0.0005338395,0.000035323606,0.00030353997,0.000056285535,0.89792436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78027683,0.0034499613,0.0020491637,0.008160426,0.00019703597,0.00005080573,0.00013532364,0.00007275302,0.20560774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962597,0.0007524971,0.00005122497,0.00060041645,0.001443305,0.00089287985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861515,0.0003707977,0.000098145414,0.00012488892,0.0005004278,0.00029061807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014950559,0.00042744476,0.00032514895,0.0013449801,0.017212754,0.010967597,0.0011671509,0.0040301573,0.011476136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034424183,0.00029044983,0.00046153044,0.0019286567,0.027386546,0.0032233514,0.0036319676,0.0053501916,0.0006624111],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045815937,0.000001893037,0.00025236898,0.000008804402,0.000002668134,0.00003531952,0.0026645171,0.000081917286,0.000052115,0.9914008,0.003587988,0.0019071032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014320684,0.000015388032,0.00547197,0.00019820631,0.000022347449,0.00010209931,0.0077892817,0.0005363818,0.00040446038,0.33403793,0.65134394,0.00006365553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87851745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94253904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9401718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059828196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06294425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43408597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2465911966","doi":"10.1057/9780230593084_13","title":"The Constitutional Responsibility of the Civil Service","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Civil service; Civil servants; Political science; Foundation (evidence); Law; Corporate governance; Service (business); Constitutional law; Public administration; Public service; Management; Business; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.04531185164541579,"score_gpt":0.2901860181264876,"score_spread":0.2448741664810718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2465911966","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006594589,0.004889779,0.00466578,0.026233671,0.00059815997,0.000022868851,0.00004703863,0.00003765348,0.95691055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7685538,0.006097092,0.0025451074,0.009977369,0.0014272729,0.00014615148,0.0001067143,0.00007610398,0.21107048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959422,0.0015827576,0.000111896166,0.00048520102,0.0012231634,0.00065490586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981645,0.0009903715,0.0001042462,0.000268488,0.00031593253,0.00015649002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037079593,0.00025292212,0.0002695917,0.00090739276,0.005649468,0.0073971753,0.0007465161,0.0029494718,0.006668233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067578633,0.00029591928,0.00020986507,0.0010877004,0.022360638,0.0040621203,0.002464206,0.0060159806,0.0011269383],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.1790216e-7,0.0000011331439,0.000013004222,0.000002056831,1.851243e-7,0.0000033686454,0.00026118782,0.000021522796,0.000008731862,0.99666494,0.0020720905,0.0009513457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042842257,0.0000051449456,0.00021050608,0.00009130766,0.0000023287778,0.000030393987,0.0010232138,0.0001496838,0.00010923156,0.6005472,0.39782026,0.0000063702696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016647467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0129522495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016647467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006275285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013384107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045530558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2473381718","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2960","title":"Conservatives, the Supreme Court of Canada, and the Constitution: Judicial-Government Relations, 2006–2015","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Government (linguistics); Law; Charter; Narrative; Political science; Constitution; Legislation; Legislature; Sociology","score_opus":0.017403640949150624,"score_gpt":0.2437681554265631,"score_spread":0.2263645144774125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2473381718","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52642876,0.0144552225,0.00066552556,0.095595464,0.00071552827,0.00007238484,0.0006909685,0.00005185232,0.36132425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9558469,0.0016846037,0.00014696535,0.00736941,0.00007758863,0.000016850696,0.00011032597,0.00001875029,0.034728665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.992014,0.000693781,0.00012268651,0.00043652,0.003015302,0.0037177894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99532723,0.0011372439,0.0004524507,0.00012899948,0.0018261748,0.0011279265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003818941,0.00026574894,0.00042812558,0.0022303096,0.04858905,0.013505321,0.0015340903,0.0045252345,0.0028515782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012519617,0.00044309912,0.00022643222,0.004187967,0.018506361,0.0023316238,0.0033617713,0.0082256505,0.00019147202],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077556564,0.000063325664,0.019428425,0.000082939856,0.000027070688,0.0011506666,0.16743468,0.0006094938,0.00059792947,0.6937755,0.09328684,0.023465553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002280351,0.000032959724,0.09373401,0.00043709017,0.00004142158,0.00024369343,0.13373545,0.00038529432,0.00091725343,0.016694333,0.7535742,0.00018140613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99038625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15885425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15885425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2104192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97560984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W247503758","doi":"","title":"Esmein et le droit canadien: une rencontre manquée","year":2013,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista crítica de historia de las relaciones laborales y de la política social/Revista crítica de historia de las relaciones laborales y de la política social","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"French; Constitution; Political science; Humanities; Law; Art","score_opus":0.007715129355629878,"score_gpt":0.28716516807360465,"score_spread":0.27945003871797475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W247503758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024859019,0.0912659,0.0012927054,0.3479533,0.0038650034,0.0000182331,0.00022394687,0.00004969106,0.5304722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64510375,0.048553772,0.00096383464,0.043869913,0.0019245899,0.000027776905,0.00009255676,0.00009150802,0.2593723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99619365,0.0006392024,0.000047856996,0.00033101256,0.0016019589,0.0011862227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975553,0.0009492906,0.000089594825,0.0001250098,0.0009532905,0.0003276527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00305891,0.0004654005,0.00048758864,0.0021919997,0.019652303,0.011179891,0.0015303887,0.0045682425,0.010556589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005449345,0.00025445683,0.000291715,0.0035546094,0.030407948,0.0049192132,0.0031702407,0.006015063,0.00050604495],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012942076,0.0000058486803,0.00035156953,0.00004101976,0.0000036544232,0.000078535515,0.0076114885,0.000080998136,0.000055946228,0.93327045,0.04710143,0.0113860415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046436553,0.000003922077,0.0012644174,0.00021659212,0.0000067270703,0.00004547423,0.006692823,0.000074811695,0.0000935272,0.02846745,0.9631111,0.000018490848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96199787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9727331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.081980035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.081980035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09105181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59480953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2475791451","doi":"","title":"Indian Act By-Laws: A Viable Means for First Nations to (Re)Assert Control Over Local Matters Now and Not Later","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisdiction; Mandate; Political science; Federal jurisdiction; Government (linguistics); Statutory interpretation; Pace; Indian country; Negotiation; Power (physics); Statutory law; Geography","score_opus":0.011327064165617306,"score_gpt":0.2568753717229908,"score_spread":0.2455483075573735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2475791451","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011886017,0.0020981845,0.016435686,0.04551438,0.0017850802,0.00018260314,0.00018952752,0.0007390334,0.9211694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5636608,0.0030406432,0.02712311,0.07300989,0.0011311467,0.00071948953,0.00042147384,0.00044441217,0.33044904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.989749,0.0030601134,0.0005704578,0.0009092364,0.0039044602,0.0018066717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898788,0.003532572,0.0011673218,0.0026641372,0.0019051398,0.0008520113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008123975,0.00055875815,0.00043170806,0.001543182,0.0072356067,0.012624717,0.0028622716,0.007881847,0.008363732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01663244,0.0008817267,0.0009850031,0.0017101347,0.0153216915,0.0066542057,0.0070709563,0.011149832,0.0043666176],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009540567,0.000020075535,0.00041995736,0.000047137684,0.0000052614605,0.000100902,0.0027851344,0.0001075365,0.00033775027,0.9594517,0.025508044,0.011206988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021175845,0.000051654195,0.0025997572,0.00039101622,0.000051717685,0.00036010626,0.003244606,0.0004098819,0.0012415748,0.09601441,0.895522,0.0000921114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059709277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08683779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94029075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005357576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024677165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11872345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2475800475","doi":"10.22201/iij.24487937e.2015.9.8183","title":"Charter Interpretation, Judicial Review and a Community's Constitutional Morality: Responding to Natalie Stoljar on Wil Waluchow","year":2015,"lang":"es","type":"review","venue":"Problema Anuario de Filosofía y Teoría del Derecho","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Interpretation (philosophy); Morality; Worry; Humanities; Philosophy; Epistemology; Democracy; Political science; Sociology; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.08516005879393775,"score_gpt":0.3752467636066387,"score_spread":0.290086704812701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2475800475","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060925297,0.021032047,0.021439468,0.7099784,0.0020486745,0.000048600246,0.00006088388,0.000091540416,0.184375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90526086,0.005504911,0.0029579692,0.06480132,0.002255593,0.00009533024,0.000023397197,0.000080524915,0.019020088],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9827791,0.01052949,0.00045940027,0.0015328889,0.0033009085,0.0013983479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803002,0.015595544,0.0011404962,0.0006808733,0.0017292849,0.0005536546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016526619,0.00031141908,0.0006761189,0.0021628714,0.009715309,0.014832317,0.0020543125,0.010199625,0.0022371195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029098675,0.00042004153,0.00054477557,0.002241657,0.031274088,0.0105012385,0.007262644,0.011994601,0.00028190395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049069668,0.0000070021633,0.00010226623,0.000013831151,0.0000025362428,0.000062128536,0.0054701595,0.000089915266,0.0000342813,0.9819797,0.00986788,0.0023653444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017723774,0.000018602223,0.00067021546,0.00028247075,0.000013740509,0.00009702204,0.00784002,0.0009738585,0.00040688206,0.81878453,0.17083207,0.00006285098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010136343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012225855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016526619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008757048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006362042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.087402165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2476799288","doi":"10.29173/alr318","title":"Forging Alberta's Constitutional Framework, Richard Connors and John M. Law, eds., and The Alberta Supreme Court at 100: History and Authority, Jonathan Swainger, Ed.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Constitution; Jurisprudence; Law of the land; Common law; Constitutional law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03283384707397708,"score_gpt":0.2803437341057613,"score_spread":0.24750988703178423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2476799288","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033540812,0.51207596,0.0018871143,0.17740141,0.0050568087,0.000027581247,0.00027726233,0.00009794417,0.29982182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16710599,0.42902362,0.0050473893,0.05703317,0.0028650083,0.00009196555,0.0006119783,0.00020593953,0.33801493],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99671763,0.00049442763,0.000054216638,0.00022540943,0.0017620007,0.0007463652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861336,0.00045691707,0.00005702268,0.00006238675,0.00046534857,0.00034499317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024761881,0.00082043966,0.00048985734,0.0025041848,0.014267576,0.01567373,0.002839759,0.006414501,0.009038652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033691446,0.00067536446,0.0004676451,0.0056417403,0.020569963,0.0064287693,0.0024877351,0.005279746,0.0014353988],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010735952,0.000014758149,0.00071654597,0.00011281141,0.0000074764334,0.00017303863,0.0051960675,0.00032422598,0.0000906638,0.45063847,0.48767132,0.05504386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051129346,0.0000023180767,0.0022437049,0.00045044103,0.000007588796,0.00006683693,0.0052981065,0.000080615726,0.000057314028,0.057179607,0.93458396,0.000024414137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9441302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98392177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91109407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08890592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14244395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64506066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2477706564","doi":"","title":"The U.S. Constitution and comparative constitutional law : texts, cases, and materials","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Entomology and Zoology","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Casebook; Law; Constitution; Political science; Constitutional law; Dignity; Civil liberties; Constitutionalism; Democracy; Comparative law; Jurisprudence; Rule of law; Human rights; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.040449249827115674,"score_gpt":0.3242350267866917,"score_spread":0.283785776959576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2477706564","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002819916,0.115322575,0.0039699455,0.017464163,0.005777518,0.000201221,0.0013296505,0.0001646535,0.85295033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12242377,0.24447076,0.014801155,0.018999314,0.008265084,0.00214694,0.005711175,0.000449972,0.58273184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903345,0.00040770255,0.00007500975,0.00009287624,0.00029886668,0.00009200954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980009,0.0015479171,0.00009895309,0.00010880865,0.0001766314,0.00006669862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014735487,0.0007759731,0.00052374,0.0053276955,0.0031620748,0.004868813,0.0009890938,0.002328807,0.028419381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038586706,0.0004979776,0.00033553352,0.0086615,0.0049530687,0.005377261,0.0016779613,0.0029085875,0.005443665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009669649,0.000044739263,0.00012673023,0.00021867783,0.0000025792087,0.0001412029,0.001554819,0.00030001363,0.00010013529,0.48439455,0.47602704,0.037079886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040443747,0.000008604121,0.000365796,0.0005387388,0.0000016331637,0.00007125619,0.000723622,0.00007434422,0.000047262234,0.028991787,0.9691665,0.0000065451577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012527578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020071615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028419381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004407583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031157015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09507227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2477751738","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511996399.011","title":"Judges and free speech in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Impartiality; Law; Political science; Free speech; Independence (probability theory); Tribunal; Bill of rights; Freedom of expression; Subject (documents); Human rights; Computer science","score_opus":0.031073593547379295,"score_gpt":0.19541047880285728,"score_spread":0.164336885255478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2477751738","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031782802,0.016997632,0.00079031417,0.023660054,0.0006240153,0.00004748184,0.00016642876,0.0000359415,0.92589533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7608458,0.009704469,0.0007730325,0.007472391,0.00026338582,0.000047155958,0.00012253544,0.00006879255,0.22070241],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948979,0.0008238208,0.00008655782,0.00038924784,0.0018883325,0.0019141089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971818,0.0011451801,0.0001016921,0.000086035245,0.001005514,0.00047990272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020088302,0.00039094844,0.00050952693,0.0021344938,0.029505884,0.011851245,0.0020252264,0.004181126,0.010830437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005395025,0.00039319004,0.00030462173,0.004460435,0.020380003,0.002252279,0.0031922811,0.0051426063,0.0005831667],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000103317325,0.000011677592,0.00040490564,0.00005073922,0.000004200719,0.00028343714,0.01621127,0.00024317414,0.000099121324,0.93430865,0.036529142,0.0118433405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029640585,0.000014272511,0.0046213423,0.0004627258,0.00002169981,0.00012601916,0.017804017,0.000620633,0.00025579758,0.073825896,0.90214956,0.00006843439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9883442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99446315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14179341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14179341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18841185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2477902474","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004495","title":"Reality Check: On the Uses of Empiricism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Notice; Law; Principal (computer security); Empiricism; Politics; Majority opinion; Empirical research; Political science; Set (abstract data type); Judicial opinion; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.12448802076700792,"score_gpt":0.3353811908439809,"score_spread":0.21089317007697295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2477902474","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015766034,0.12889554,0.11124489,0.5166369,0.008485454,0.00018561476,0.00069915823,0.00052293716,0.21756348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78240937,0.04083979,0.072667524,0.07013194,0.01351833,0.0005179556,0.00059422705,0.0007541695,0.018566798],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9497638,0.038647506,0.0012520242,0.00238469,0.006659115,0.001293031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7745595,0.20143129,0.003365317,0.008778339,0.010656663,0.0012089184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05210793,0.0011703131,0.0022851524,0.011995064,0.006669285,0.013260835,0.004694122,0.0037088154,0.006644763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1453516,0.00067452533,0.0014656928,0.0058898847,0.07586266,0.020488799,0.0067726695,0.008840132,0.0009848024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002471347,0.000013251526,0.000750617,0.00015057527,0.00006757863,0.00007883626,0.00327123,0.00040929407,0.000024252578,0.9494374,0.02877693,0.016995342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023850469,0.000021299018,0.0011273887,0.0007212914,0.000022957845,0.000056048262,0.0034124071,0.0013242575,0.00009392908,0.9097255,0.083431154,0.000039924616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033459526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027210357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05210793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010414067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007261629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27557635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W247829152","doi":"10.3138/jcs.35.4.161","title":"A Relational Approach to Constitutional Interpretation: Shared Legislative and judicial Responsibilities","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Charter; Law; Legislature; Judgement; Political science; Scrutiny; Politics; Constitution; Normative; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.08277041333907274,"score_gpt":0.3151061979674701,"score_spread":0.23233578462839732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W247829152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019106338,0.005486455,0.12809685,0.03933412,0.00052267127,0.00013393107,0.00007551706,0.00013193866,0.8071122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9424175,0.0027658243,0.023745336,0.0033604,0.00041888107,0.00015510031,0.00005835118,0.00013855715,0.026940139],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96568376,0.019414168,0.00087669765,0.0022819939,0.008752935,0.0029904258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875466,0.0062165684,0.00093102443,0.0017270863,0.0028113134,0.0007674852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019157052,0.00063842005,0.00077141594,0.0029657942,0.014321957,0.017570429,0.003550368,0.004340422,0.0054845153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024552202,0.00073350716,0.00071248534,0.0035803688,0.08820879,0.014762947,0.0077896304,0.0079736,0.00061062345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001939565,0.0000014893229,0.000043953234,0.000008687621,0.0000017770294,0.000020203774,0.0068617864,0.00006916339,0.000034535304,0.9909061,0.00034878473,0.0017014191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022730206,0.000018199831,0.0008712195,0.00027537657,0.000027424609,0.00011729829,0.014862105,0.0011958802,0.0002944686,0.8774755,0.10479937,0.00004048675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29934183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3074685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7006582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04435719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050093904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5951989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2480128589","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-28371-5_13","title":"Common Law Constitutionalism and the Written Constitution","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Law and philosophy library","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Constitution; Law; Political science; Democracy","score_opus":0.02528376833178137,"score_gpt":0.2372869374388661,"score_spread":0.21200316910708475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2480128589","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0070938473,0.012799277,0.008467187,0.017702121,0.00048179453,0.000020686635,0.00010331389,0.00006408913,0.9532676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61497045,0.0077765784,0.0042343154,0.005142142,0.0013956113,0.0001262994,0.00023012472,0.00016670807,0.3659578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985487,0.0008024519,0.000049435224,0.00017403439,0.00028686115,0.00013856757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998494,0.0010247576,0.00007871649,0.00019408434,0.00013834107,0.000070088056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021054198,0.0003661001,0.0003918191,0.0013856996,0.0037701353,0.0089933975,0.00079000375,0.00288814,0.012449859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046369685,0.0003177538,0.00026694295,0.0020240538,0.02170812,0.005708884,0.0017694682,0.0047334186,0.0016489304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010191193,0.000002322412,0.000010477265,0.000005085707,4.2090662e-7,0.000003636113,0.00023940206,0.00002833657,0.000010855967,0.99617743,0.002168887,0.0013520478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033735314,0.0000020519306,0.00007102057,0.000043173175,0.0000015222718,0.0000102998965,0.00021974297,0.00008684735,0.00006125854,0.93440044,0.065097325,0.0000029429632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009195644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012757259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012449859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004854318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006224769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041648924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2482659382","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004380","title":"Censorship, Logocracy and Democracy","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Censorship; Charter; Democracy; Law; Political science; Legislature; Politics; Free speech; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.041191366519729114,"score_gpt":0.28902593959219386,"score_spread":0.24783457307246476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2482659382","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12519093,0.0036963315,0.012638366,0.055581484,0.00026803985,0.000050338076,0.00006359781,0.00006737644,0.8024435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98558193,0.00054125173,0.00041581216,0.0014129505,0.000066670495,0.000010765769,0.00001026748,0.000008248924,0.011952081],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951331,0.0018467779,0.000090580834,0.00047759476,0.0012904267,0.0011614389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929391,0.003787177,0.0009611864,0.0008906621,0.000804164,0.0006176824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042999308,0.00019015986,0.00029818012,0.0012191022,0.009186612,0.007343765,0.0009123586,0.0018389147,0.00409881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007682597,0.00015433041,0.00019370644,0.0012533768,0.062019523,0.0033898929,0.0033367025,0.0030481494,0.00026547443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003094403,0.0000044385424,0.00042732316,0.0000068663785,0.0000012072385,0.000022494609,0.0020039536,0.00008453845,0.000019713494,0.9943374,0.0007024881,0.0023865344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027516724,0.000022934628,0.0034410933,0.00012842171,0.000010338906,0.00012480245,0.005568448,0.0004939616,0.00033662195,0.85737944,0.13243945,0.000027041875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16795082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19950265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16795082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014436681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017770981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33394647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2483824911","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781316144930.010","title":"Dreaming the rule of law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Rule of law; Law; Computer science; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06031350594233822,"score_gpt":0.24804973950906664,"score_spread":0.18773623356672842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2483824911","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042677666,0.016445745,0.0064163283,0.06495802,0.0014631933,0.000015672285,0.0001045939,0.00007956811,0.9062491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42939973,0.013871822,0.005278357,0.019931199,0.0020651792,0.00007926787,0.00014884699,0.00023558222,0.52899003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978629,0.0007054722,0.00006612614,0.00037096793,0.0007107609,0.00028384716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845266,0.0006690478,0.000076124175,0.00031729,0.00033917982,0.00014553161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002877583,0.0003419205,0.0004131432,0.00086239696,0.0043557617,0.008885542,0.0008917956,0.003225871,0.013968736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006938362,0.00025702605,0.000353476,0.0005623839,0.021368742,0.010078063,0.0025989457,0.006065816,0.003071888],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002419278,0.0000027640067,0.000026594695,0.000009761209,7.7646143e-7,0.0000085711,0.00045603438,0.000034033823,0.000029383396,0.978084,0.017048473,0.0042970628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004091378,0.0000062428617,0.00014654409,0.00011212236,0.000002179697,0.000030529143,0.000840258,0.00012366509,0.00011683012,0.6511848,0.34742722,0.000005595803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0101587195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013625442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013968736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004332304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063451687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0467301},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2485501773","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199246687.003.0018","title":"The Canadian Charter of Rights: Recognition, Redistribution, and the Imperialism of the Courts","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Human rights; Supreme court; Law; Politics; Fundamental rights; Linguistic rights; Democracy; Social rights; Right to property; International human rights law","score_opus":0.019371332123288735,"score_gpt":0.23272155905561007,"score_spread":0.21335022693232134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2485501773","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013822541,0.00967194,0.0022470749,0.04709802,0.00046318283,0.000027502501,0.00012464613,0.00003513228,0.92650986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8454338,0.008326737,0.0021536609,0.0050696083,0.00028638358,0.000034457717,0.000093370225,0.000056693294,0.13854523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99533314,0.00070669694,0.000059018672,0.00036777186,0.0024319724,0.0011014269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99716526,0.0008024782,0.00009524003,0.00017814216,0.0013917969,0.00036714645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002473517,0.0003186915,0.00039553878,0.002795671,0.011663323,0.013561251,0.0012148757,0.0022060606,0.0075778686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005464131,0.00021192718,0.00023012681,0.0034003963,0.028810127,0.0030532498,0.0019753089,0.0036375194,0.00040505079],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031997563,0.0000018343437,0.000087444365,0.000010811844,6.3363666e-7,0.000017591614,0.0016503114,0.00008437172,0.00002924654,0.98312426,0.009379058,0.005611136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013926873,0.000009756131,0.002988931,0.00037836525,0.000013250241,0.00007721669,0.0063382178,0.00067615387,0.00025925264,0.2361244,0.7530838,0.000036721412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97036093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97725505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.116346784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.116346784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11607198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84415895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2489273056","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781107110311.002","title":"Burdens of Proof in Legal Reasoning","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Burden of proof; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.022915529025306025,"score_gpt":0.22569421164129955,"score_spread":0.20277868261599352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2489273056","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031449702,0.033802997,0.059638023,0.018184042,0.0013620494,0.00010475188,0.00009108981,0.00007810332,0.8835939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6695387,0.04841665,0.061166827,0.014895466,0.007994627,0.0009840814,0.00027921208,0.00043827435,0.19628616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852905,0.007621827,0.000568315,0.0011623444,0.004596771,0.0007601233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9811313,0.014667115,0.00062540517,0.0019821436,0.001298013,0.00029600004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012313637,0.0012144268,0.0010478387,0.003029717,0.004903358,0.011729186,0.0027981983,0.005642569,0.012147559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024821647,0.00088096375,0.00090752885,0.0027446956,0.038551018,0.020153152,0.0057589384,0.010570135,0.0030444376],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015727585,0.0000018665608,0.000008092158,0.000015957374,8.860766e-7,0.000006937423,0.00017066418,0.0000703483,0.000008438203,0.99718684,0.0011312161,0.0013970761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041641183,0.0000026596886,0.000020189078,0.00008499344,0.0000016994868,0.00001601952,0.00007160968,0.0001376243,0.000024351259,0.97134,0.028293911,0.0000028834627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002809051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001871726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012313637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010739382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056168158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07792008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2489335664","doi":"10.1093/0199261180.003.0009","title":"The Emergence of Republican Rights","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Globalization; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Cultural rights; Political economy; Public administration; Law; Human rights; Sociology; History; Fundamental rights; Politics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.031073656198231173,"score_gpt":0.282414870427917,"score_spread":0.25134121422968586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2489335664","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008546692,0.0016808751,0.0020880431,0.008568119,0.000095078,0.0000072074727,0.000020220103,0.000014722297,0.97897905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8148354,0.0022662035,0.0011873418,0.002166523,0.0002821841,0.000039605507,0.000044504835,0.00004181105,0.17913637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982033,0.0008249903,0.00003512949,0.00025463963,0.00042087285,0.00026106383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807847,0.00086710363,0.0001300856,0.00034731033,0.00037517797,0.00020192677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021221815,0.00019175337,0.00017585017,0.0008027974,0.002946751,0.006308718,0.0005138272,0.0011410796,0.010486518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002743121,0.00017033644,0.0001618108,0.00097152893,0.016442213,0.0051487256,0.0034432244,0.0047913846,0.0010632003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.394513e-7,0.0000017121768,0.000036031703,0.0000021600927,2.5073732e-7,0.000009657874,0.0009045356,0.000016068336,0.000018520028,0.9951853,0.001810875,0.002014128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004616301,0.000006603496,0.0004172985,0.00009348045,0.0000015906489,0.0000723146,0.0012310112,0.00025799163,0.00015068594,0.5492489,0.44851005,0.000005483033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040743924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005429399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010486518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049845963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003086009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036166012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2490826838","doi":"10.29173/alr311","title":"Parens Patriae as a Basis for Provincial Standing in Judicial Review of Federal Decisions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; State (computer science); Judicial review; Sovereignty; Private rights; Public rights; Government (linguistics); Sovereign immunity; Constitution","score_opus":0.07279302115669435,"score_gpt":0.3563120840525252,"score_spread":0.28351906289583084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2490826838","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16585352,0.0057622837,0.03319017,0.086814545,0.00081404066,0.00069657207,0.00023813019,0.00018313808,0.70644766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9747635,0.00079982897,0.006833879,0.003550169,0.00013134012,0.00009124947,0.000031743806,0.000021582151,0.0137768015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9722543,0.010079413,0.0019338687,0.0018352122,0.008876729,0.005020645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95548403,0.022926245,0.0025178653,0.0034692534,0.013860892,0.0017416867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03425736,0.000147516,0.00043929173,0.002972595,0.009269099,0.010799396,0.0016603202,0.003220757,0.0028474755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09233889,0.0005945624,0.00043044443,0.0028019887,0.018541213,0.0037206726,0.0034841232,0.0057051363,0.0002927333],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013070247,0.000013395468,0.0033793282,0.000046282665,0.000014161232,0.00010832717,0.0065397373,0.00033922307,0.00031047815,0.9597889,0.007858313,0.021588767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012174495,0.00014086544,0.048946943,0.0011630071,0.00014639534,0.00043784088,0.012619719,0.007228265,0.001845729,0.6109567,0.3161331,0.0002596963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35952777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.66861373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64047223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02994253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08481395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71487015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2491870741","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781107706798.007","title":"Pragmatism and the High Commission","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Content (measure theory); Pragmatism; Computer science; Political science; Epistemology; Mathematics; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.01873745677563751,"score_gpt":0.21098610543895188,"score_spread":0.19224864866331437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2491870741","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075649205,0.009459853,0.0025406687,0.03877022,0.00054524123,0.0000104741575,0.00002906169,0.000035392284,0.94104415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7204889,0.0035764761,0.0013681102,0.007814192,0.00075185165,0.00004933703,0.000029442203,0.00007375915,0.26584786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99658316,0.0015982672,0.000060164697,0.0003642211,0.0009202556,0.00047401115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983789,0.0008567663,0.00012295913,0.00026564134,0.00024920757,0.00012658804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028728342,0.00022726125,0.00028804896,0.00085993565,0.005242312,0.008162396,0.00073333975,0.0036434033,0.00817373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00804823,0.00020179227,0.00022405632,0.0016758123,0.016689366,0.004202709,0.0026671789,0.005885927,0.0014262844],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019624224,0.0000014910738,0.000018578186,0.000005223632,3.576953e-7,0.000009003207,0.0005399027,0.000032513042,0.000008813044,0.99084854,0.0066135037,0.0019200414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007884701,0.000004833639,0.00025169912,0.00011412192,0.0000023756172,0.00004213003,0.0011309391,0.00018810482,0.00012402228,0.76944655,0.22868052,0.0000068390277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006394847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009062926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00817373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076253046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055786846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055325747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2496009610","doi":"10.5325/goodsociety.20.1.0073","title":"Constitutional Artisanship and Institutional Diversity:","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Good Society","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Icon; Citation; Download; Diversity (politics); State (computer science); Library science; Politics; Political science; Search engine optimization; Publishing; Media studies; World Wide Web; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Search engine; Algorithm","score_opus":0.09882504941416737,"score_gpt":0.26870447130229036,"score_spread":0.169879421888123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2496009610","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15817714,0.040972922,0.0012365314,0.101800695,0.0007279203,0.00002601947,0.00040914371,0.00002282584,0.6966268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97299945,0.006084729,0.00016788479,0.0012568212,0.00049046404,0.000011937676,0.00009329904,0.000015628977,0.018879823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977087,0.0010829563,0.000060892336,0.0001942684,0.00045705133,0.0004960987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973949,0.0011205816,0.00038955067,0.00024044172,0.00020273827,0.0006518323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024028006,0.00016744937,0.00031755117,0.0013762631,0.0048469594,0.00715522,0.0006035529,0.0011621033,0.019959519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00704308,0.00014179334,0.00023199899,0.003130138,0.009134217,0.004284927,0.006010933,0.001726017,0.00067116716],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056726647,0.00007393203,0.013798908,0.00012823047,0.000022702488,0.00019497566,0.010726173,0.00036748912,0.00008197246,0.8716261,0.059996165,0.042926643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005045565,0.000061135004,0.07542526,0.0010698705,0.000032498418,0.0005604114,0.03897772,0.0004833136,0.00021205258,0.4274848,0.4555968,0.000045670684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006644086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012140334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019959519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037188316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037591332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06677121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2496809799","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199557769.001.0001","title":"Delegating Rights Protection","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Bill of rights; Politics; Charter; Law; Civil liberties; Human rights; Statutory law; Elite; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.029492247000531407,"score_gpt":0.27670077779104196,"score_spread":0.24720853079051056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2496809799","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027505036,0.0005302106,0.011381207,0.0030374106,0.00020887474,0.00011471465,0.00019085269,0.00018951976,0.9815969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2660169,0.0017472397,0.0105177965,0.0043987096,0.0006027557,0.00030587128,0.0007105541,0.00038388846,0.7153163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992788,0.0012916599,0.0003010325,0.0012193212,0.0026381782,0.0017617751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960173,0.0009830378,0.00019162659,0.001673725,0.0008908023,0.00024352635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005094056,0.0006933873,0.0005950601,0.001472444,0.0047015105,0.007611799,0.0020969573,0.003562287,0.10852527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008718297,0.0004929211,0.00081378175,0.0015588714,0.007165485,0.006437395,0.0067170914,0.0036126508,0.018711666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008832159,0.000013047522,0.00016193112,0.000027316288,0.0000027562385,0.00005031355,0.00086392055,0.00013516529,0.00022865213,0.9617766,0.01778217,0.018949261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016471313,0.000016328177,0.00048603033,0.00013340639,0.000008944057,0.00013206535,0.00043297044,0.00039364814,0.0006132937,0.12091076,0.8768402,0.000015965627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02976941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023555953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10852527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006161737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008366077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3630532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2498781594","doi":"10.29173/alr246","title":"&lt;i&gt;Weak Courts, Strong Rights: Judicial Review and Social Welfare Rights in Comparative Constitutional Law&lt;/i&gt;, Mark Tushnet","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Judicial review; Welfare rights; Social rights; Constitutional law; Judicial restraint; Welfare; Judicial activism; Human rights","score_opus":0.03604896672027261,"score_gpt":0.30205467633477995,"score_spread":0.2660057096145073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2498781594","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004950684,0.29603612,0.0045662955,0.35848826,0.0025044417,0.000062424515,0.0005330403,0.00009730566,0.33276144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44251862,0.1863774,0.008417685,0.0991819,0.010489724,0.0004844872,0.000511476,0.0002951753,0.2517235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963856,0.0019189738,0.00018948074,0.00040020084,0.00078715367,0.0003186746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942609,0.0046352297,0.0002975641,0.00019099665,0.00046880104,0.00014644724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063681067,0.0005184104,0.0004466831,0.0028066505,0.0040187244,0.007981517,0.0013094312,0.008108199,0.012612662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012534139,0.0005638919,0.00036981027,0.004197103,0.01546261,0.008768699,0.0014208988,0.0042637195,0.0017289354],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000102900485,0.000012166919,0.00026569495,0.00012687281,0.000006819948,0.00004900959,0.0009491959,0.00012957258,0.00007248987,0.7230713,0.26057187,0.014734696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002883149,0.00001738855,0.003305506,0.0006468592,0.000019538116,0.000082297374,0.002064272,0.00036780487,0.00031389648,0.56879425,0.42432895,0.00003041094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05774361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15199296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05774361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010848449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069764294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.114815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2500420217","doi":"10.4018/978-1-59904-998-4.ch013","title":"Courts on the Web in Russia","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IGI Global eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Skepticism; Economic Justice; Political science","score_opus":0.03018805952745681,"score_gpt":0.2768453033660644,"score_spread":0.24665724383860757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2500420217","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2673165,0.027716288,0.0013535954,0.035714887,0.000624831,0.000034814577,0.0009017741,0.00019501822,0.6661424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94890565,0.014118762,0.00049411465,0.0027763578,0.00036495732,0.00002785324,0.00059394806,0.0000572419,0.032661166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986884,0.0005132613,0.00007809976,0.00017546723,0.0003561277,0.00018871082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829644,0.0005880303,0.00043852502,0.00010971085,0.00017028881,0.0003970132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066186016,0.00007643004,0.00021369981,0.0021559277,0.002481403,0.0070941676,0.0004135031,0.0013737862,0.014124797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028600486,0.00016854118,0.00018063997,0.003741423,0.001896613,0.004725623,0.0034814202,0.0015166121,0.0026668238],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010093287,0.00027881353,0.08105633,0.0006615298,0.000057648635,0.006565811,0.04705061,0.00035965448,0.0019436416,0.42950144,0.12199739,0.31042624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013282771,0.000037012782,0.09080755,0.0007771475,0.000032021326,0.0024321217,0.020616122,0.00046054655,0.00034587763,0.020793242,0.86365795,0.000027055485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011466262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009530553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014124797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024280515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001805041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04725218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2501486594","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199246687.003.0001","title":"Introduction: On Being Sceptical about Human Rights","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Parliament; Political science; Skepticism; Law; International human rights law; Statute; Fundamental rights; Legislation; Politics","score_opus":0.028869479544128596,"score_gpt":0.2931213340121179,"score_spread":0.26425185446798927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2501486594","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031971836,0.064668305,0.0018774904,0.16969062,0.010917217,0.00003094425,0.00014456459,0.00007845051,0.74939513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10854077,0.07863867,0.0017175034,0.091264084,0.01252456,0.00010330387,0.0002700656,0.0002349597,0.70670605],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914587,0.00032526586,0.000022015398,0.000116250296,0.0003185026,0.00007205751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974105,0.0019775156,0.00008590976,0.000087247085,0.00032562812,0.000113123184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010562696,0.00039490807,0.00031995404,0.0008339162,0.002207124,0.0051919217,0.00061389187,0.002678474,0.014410652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002830039,0.00018843722,0.00017886587,0.0011838756,0.008248668,0.005414193,0.0013206903,0.005363192,0.004232819],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007766084,0.00001736796,0.00011866233,0.00013904754,0.0000016805686,0.00007404972,0.0076899054,0.00007887386,0.000081875245,0.4481639,0.51491636,0.028710509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022158565,0.000008844977,0.00020802453,0.00043365898,0.0000010725355,0.00006664957,0.0017914188,0.00003109568,0.00003619585,0.036507796,0.9609098,0.0000031561833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031325761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045675486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014410652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00209875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018860966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048208416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2503475841","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199606078.003.0003","title":"Governing Like Judges?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Scrutiny; Skepticism; Politics; Bureaucracy; Judicial review; Law and economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.06263097720416115,"score_gpt":0.2684960441311539,"score_spread":0.20586506692699275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2503475841","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034546247,0.008501177,0.0038349244,0.032479715,0.0014074625,0.000035369092,0.000034437464,0.00004332293,0.9502091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2574464,0.008876934,0.0026556593,0.01898647,0.0015229173,0.0001170742,0.00008995442,0.000100400415,0.71020424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983229,0.000758816,0.000039653918,0.00028194577,0.00044953128,0.00014724018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868685,0.0008512768,0.0000538276,0.000102805716,0.00023089301,0.00007442135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002131879,0.00020214582,0.00022391495,0.0004785702,0.0024355447,0.004425278,0.0005835351,0.0016934187,0.009591009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031592848,0.00015663457,0.00014431351,0.0005205738,0.008170692,0.0033987034,0.0010438423,0.0033522868,0.00180851],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013057356,0.0000042819056,0.000039122307,0.00001774992,5.450139e-7,0.000010954541,0.0014535208,0.000057714406,0.000038769904,0.96223587,0.02901299,0.007127247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043707314,0.000008545799,0.00027554674,0.00019740414,0.00000237035,0.000031964897,0.0011208826,0.00021220851,0.00017255523,0.2514878,0.74648094,0.000005421244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0078006317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013251797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009591009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052202544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039684228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037875712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2506553429","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1333","title":"A False Start in Constitutionalizing Lawyer Loyalty in Canada (Attorney General) v. Federation of Law Societies of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Supreme court; Charter; Duty; Economic Justice; Loyalty","score_opus":0.037464262260314546,"score_gpt":0.2785010715568673,"score_spread":0.24103680929655277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2506553429","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16217236,0.018844495,0.005022004,0.47379902,0.0020996546,0.00030063506,0.0006775943,0.00016734617,0.33691683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8431262,0.0029987048,0.0022320321,0.12331064,0.0005086951,0.00011861465,0.00010610648,0.00006769503,0.027531391],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9683995,0.0054828855,0.00097109744,0.00315977,0.010571402,0.011415262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9764326,0.010508822,0.0008803057,0.0010335488,0.007804922,0.0033396725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02395195,0.000501169,0.0013143184,0.0022058538,0.0416399,0.0220813,0.0058488487,0.022164244,0.0030265513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038333062,0.001247795,0.0011019281,0.0029381197,0.032003563,0.0059605036,0.005950265,0.026470426,0.00026086008],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031361273,0.000025211462,0.002110668,0.000051034152,0.000040091596,0.00020775647,0.0076945922,0.00031752093,0.00025002685,0.9545755,0.028383847,0.0063123037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003772318,0.00023287689,0.029966962,0.0015821671,0.0005460127,0.00027985472,0.033351395,0.003231092,0.0029434494,0.29147416,0.6349024,0.0011124222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99012053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99475116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84520143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15479858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27350563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98031384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513434008","doi":"","title":"La modification constitutionnelle au Canada quelle procédure de révision pour quelle constitution","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue belge de Droit constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0360644003613687,"score_gpt":0.2753735011573912,"score_spread":0.23930910079602247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2513434008","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16237359,0.01700009,0.031255804,0.046718158,0.0031273556,0.00068999274,0.0016192123,0.0007635495,0.7364523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6388925,0.0035841025,0.022102514,0.007026848,0.00044845822,0.00031824718,0.00043371817,0.00024327623,0.3269504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.984327,0.0033858574,0.00060082244,0.0019085587,0.006541316,0.0032365192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99481624,0.0014021264,0.00024100128,0.0006223711,0.0026162537,0.00030204444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063362042,0.0007218101,0.0009236491,0.002530348,0.01144415,0.009648203,0.0016342734,0.0046678865,0.009463445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013242404,0.0005688903,0.0012022972,0.0028317408,0.007989578,0.0018567003,0.0015141179,0.00876198,0.00096878596],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000716248,0.000054474105,0.0012455139,0.00008196481,0.00004555277,0.00015041672,0.0024859195,0.0012657476,0.0016621739,0.94837165,0.018011857,0.026553169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018929364,0.00008012645,0.020179322,0.00032472264,0.00011907285,0.0002798099,0.002133601,0.0023398655,0.0053853076,0.042526126,0.92624813,0.00019463626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9184484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9144524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9457012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054298837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11027998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39396745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513997421","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3609","title":"Quantifying <i>Dunsmuir</i>: An empirical analysis of the Supreme Court of Canada’s jurisprudence on standard of review","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Deference; Standard of review; Law; Jurisprudence; Argument (complex analysis); Voting; Political science; Court of record; Original jurisdiction; Medicine","score_opus":0.04199834323995864,"score_gpt":0.3078332140184926,"score_spread":0.26583487077853396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2513997421","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.932419,0.0016689312,0.001575387,0.007874277,0.00005751723,0.00019411012,0.00046077085,0.000033941124,0.055716153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966427,0.00022679378,0.00046691496,0.00065822457,0.000017848275,0.00002415885,0.000112668786,0.000013497045,0.0018372794],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.92889535,0.0117104305,0.0034037023,0.0045432104,0.044866867,0.0065803956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.64077944,0.17922673,0.060038403,0.011611017,0.0950461,0.013298369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.054283123,0.00020434064,0.0006349721,0.009180824,0.011164599,0.010297205,0.0028928625,0.0020063473,0.0020204056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23571451,0.0005712261,0.0005641795,0.012400469,0.011548811,0.0040713325,0.0038150465,0.0043725152,0.00020040423],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021314352,0.00023274736,0.7382184,0.00031070015,0.00021992432,0.0006704905,0.09624401,0.0018754315,0.001411191,0.09227366,0.011989548,0.056340653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000187016,0.00009613478,0.9441215,0.00025916766,0.00005375241,0.000111732275,0.023880644,0.0015150738,0.0007386085,0.0024540345,0.026603868,0.00014682378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9509236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9640987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88391685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.116083145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10719101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8422461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2516518577","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1287","title":"Parliamentary Scrutiny of Supreme Court Nominees: A View from the United Kingdom","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Kingdom; Biology","score_opus":0.04697390401722121,"score_gpt":0.2860130565997499,"score_spread":0.2390391525825287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2516518577","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6265366,0.021137284,0.00089201017,0.06260839,0.00053967134,0.000054105833,0.00031569452,0.000030732615,0.2878854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834974,0.0015143305,0.00015178844,0.004161747,0.00022225213,0.000012465413,0.00003759751,0.000018258293,0.01038421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9774998,0.008221008,0.0015290076,0.0017816231,0.0055620875,0.0054065245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93188584,0.041376717,0.008277912,0.0025611366,0.014004411,0.001894018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013663061,0.00020705424,0.0009995493,0.005012357,0.012847723,0.016601468,0.0018479141,0.009433326,0.005533855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07546031,0.00070934417,0.0006984214,0.0055257445,0.006758654,0.0044683376,0.004219547,0.005491032,0.00082339236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019816353,0.0001974065,0.06662873,0.0015566394,0.00045581543,0.0062570833,0.15214685,0.0019378891,0.006645663,0.5809678,0.078271516,0.10295295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019743982,0.000325923,0.44706616,0.0028271175,0.00061921316,0.0011968554,0.07351093,0.0019281362,0.0044155475,0.056639977,0.41079444,0.00047833184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2349634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3267759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2349634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015700672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008583558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46719158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2517602928","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1390","title":"Blocs, Swarms, and Outliers: Conceptualizing Disagreement on the Modern Supreme Court of Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unanimity; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Speculation; Set (abstract data type); Sociology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.03387048991167127,"score_gpt":0.2606514565487561,"score_spread":0.22678096663708483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2517602928","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59622836,0.0045881798,0.0076419944,0.037805103,0.0001262362,0.00008475906,0.00032962734,0.00006543491,0.35313037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970727,0.00043249025,0.00040380936,0.000354272,0.00002474092,0.000014034081,0.00004147674,0.00001685788,0.0016397282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98993593,0.0029743265,0.0002460769,0.00076491677,0.004101591,0.0019772027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894359,0.0046501667,0.0013756901,0.00044325506,0.0028482801,0.0012467393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006977771,0.00044169754,0.0007327045,0.008967608,0.036865667,0.017693592,0.0033881054,0.0045770113,0.0028025564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024865083,0.00040538458,0.00036797803,0.013847316,0.065615565,0.009616839,0.008143899,0.0052809534,0.00019509176],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030604187,0.000014623566,0.01224686,0.000024997664,0.000014430732,0.00026659318,0.19288231,0.0023045605,0.00008604794,0.7784201,0.004301396,0.009407396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030056612,0.000033461543,0.034118395,0.00049612625,0.000044922384,0.0002004126,0.38894764,0.008097398,0.00015843919,0.45847923,0.10919154,0.00020242132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94103533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93185467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.111065246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.111065246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050249446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8058385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2518480279","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2821129","title":"Collateral Thoughts on Dialogue's Legacy as Metaphor and Theory: A Favourite from Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Favourite; Metaphor; Collateral; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Linguistics; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.00857971304919408,"score_gpt":0.24091814250505564,"score_spread":0.23233842945586156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2518480279","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11299136,0.023116369,0.0032892548,0.47617504,0.0026200905,0.0000617574,0.0005556698,0.000114824994,0.38107562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8882275,0.006861804,0.0010780982,0.022481628,0.0005277326,0.000040534364,0.00009777268,0.0002786921,0.08040633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935819,0.001774949,0.00013758386,0.0006829301,0.0016665336,0.0021560707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98818666,0.0057904287,0.0003532368,0.00041388682,0.00343356,0.0018221809],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065551046,0.0008438327,0.0011034391,0.0030223299,0.051938016,0.027940605,0.002921906,0.008940781,0.013381413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016952006,0.00053021277,0.0004850148,0.007293146,0.037435416,0.008451452,0.0072198603,0.01683781,0.0008074809],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000117580035,0.00002697952,0.0014148498,0.00011949647,0.000017589191,0.00063106744,0.20693175,0.00020151584,0.00027580143,0.69515616,0.07638055,0.018726615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000466912,0.000020002772,0.0028144193,0.0006016647,0.00004003243,0.00025976033,0.23853357,0.0004658319,0.00045410535,0.042283542,0.7143499,0.00013039279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98835516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9929189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1674932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1674932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19340762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9655899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519836656","doi":"","title":"Teaching Religious Freedom as Legal Pluralism in Canadian Constitutional Law Classes","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Normative; Law; Legal realism; Sociology; Pluralism (philosophy); Empirical legal studies; Political science; Legal profession; Legal research; Constitutional law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01596025389885237,"score_gpt":0.28797790924970146,"score_spread":0.2720176553508491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519836656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5740909,0.0009669087,0.0066842516,0.030818833,0.00045755255,0.0005003812,0.00016857721,0.00014724108,0.38616535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95771146,0.0006373685,0.004753941,0.001917519,0.00004518811,0.00011841245,0.000064930966,0.00004075792,0.034710374],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99636996,0.0008426279,0.00006907406,0.00037921185,0.0012349389,0.0011041573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996256,0.0013155764,0.00015899866,0.0001396293,0.000618451,0.0015113929],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003969113,0.000738884,0.00039213875,0.0021732654,0.028355625,0.009618737,0.0021638153,0.0022077751,0.010860177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006189373,0.00045680357,0.0003431382,0.0019140014,0.018687183,0.0028044798,0.0049663717,0.005817295,0.00068532967],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000677504,0.00085058477,0.010812998,0.00021249708,0.000008339026,0.0009815983,0.5727836,0.0009181559,0.0042736493,0.26177117,0.03839343,0.10892631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046787776,0.00012564204,0.022105774,0.00044700678,0.00001700612,0.00027878906,0.30560932,0.0014081055,0.0025285468,0.04128643,0.62603366,0.000112962996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8758656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9665323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12413442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08484386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07656467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6155882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520716333","doi":"10.17394/83537","title":"Concept of Democracy and Role of the Judge in the Protection of Felons' Voting Right.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Democracy; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Computer security; Sociology; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.051816074591186305,"score_gpt":0.3058532693738304,"score_spread":0.2540371947826441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520716333","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06874477,0.008881133,0.060711313,0.023839952,0.0004217381,0.00008347,0.00010067971,0.000038282284,0.83717865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860839,0.0008218062,0.0021561868,0.0008701847,0.00014191022,0.000042220858,0.000013898949,0.000011490437,0.009858402],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98539126,0.009322638,0.00043351794,0.0016270253,0.0019454531,0.0012800737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99130297,0.0054701306,0.0010445705,0.0010900635,0.0006394471,0.00045284562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012684019,0.00022693946,0.00043782036,0.0019523081,0.0043760706,0.0058326344,0.0008537763,0.0029572265,0.00562571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017688354,0.00023886193,0.00039759916,0.0013750324,0.03449222,0.0055078897,0.003395965,0.003889783,0.00048764024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026790806,0.000002248263,0.00021539813,0.000009199944,0.0000021943397,0.000012322162,0.0006609765,0.000062759194,0.000034624598,0.9968791,0.00024092707,0.0018775386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012735617,0.00003370468,0.0016760158,0.00013597684,0.000012745641,0.00013941627,0.0009658727,0.00046945154,0.00024450637,0.9605547,0.035739377,0.000015463036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027862154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004754622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012684019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039721094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00387966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06708032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2521694751","doi":"","title":"Covering: Mutable Characteristics and Perceptions of (Masculine) Voice in the U.S. Supreme Court","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Toulouse 1 Capitole Publications (Université Toulouse I Capitole)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Connaught Fund; University of Chicago; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Supreme court; Masculinity; Petitioner; Perception; Social psychology; Law; Economic Justice; Psychology; Femininity; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.019706401895274284,"score_gpt":0.2562149156807763,"score_spread":0.23650851378550203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2521694751","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959495,0.00013702207,0.00006136702,0.0005523038,0.000013640921,0.0000038724497,0.00008714189,0.000001964136,0.0031931468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99930906,0.000036455254,0.000017771463,0.00013025019,0.000015185263,0.0000020467169,0.00007348637,0.0000016216654,0.00041417574],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890864,0.00027410671,0.000066103894,0.00017948399,0.00037436336,0.0001973223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904019,0.0023615623,0.004523853,0.00036281187,0.00091397663,0.0014358769],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015251015,0.00012689993,0.00017453935,0.00087048026,0.0014430933,0.0023405077,0.00031432736,0.0006944928,0.0042309184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009077755,0.00013830644,0.00012768988,0.0007549155,0.0012542021,0.0015155367,0.001670402,0.0012230614,0.00046915334],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000106732616,0.00018012806,0.9671565,0.00001600854,0.00003060616,0.00027391437,0.013523487,0.00013003184,0.00060501345,0.0010910186,0.002627526,0.014258933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029023038,0.000049158552,0.9875743,0.000029656761,0.00000686971,0.00007407982,0.0093826335,0.00021036905,0.00013609792,0.00072419096,0.0017988508,0.000010791607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0111871585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039231755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0111871585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007956082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004786405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022244096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2521847757","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12237","title":"Judicial Impartiality and Independence in Divided Societies: An Empirical Analysis of the Constitutional Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; British Academy; Queen's University Belfast; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Impartiality; Judicial independence; Political science; Law; Politics; Judicial activism; Independence (probability theory); Dissenting opinion; Judicial discretion; Constitutional court; Loyalty; Judicial opinion; Judicial review; Law and economics; Constitution; Sociology","score_opus":0.05573365378808543,"score_gpt":0.3734158386377754,"score_spread":0.31768218484968996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2521847757","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99815065,0.00021367353,0.000049749113,0.00008413032,0.0000027306382,0.0000061559126,0.000023388071,4.910625e-7,0.0014689222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99966097,0.000082983766,0.000038125145,0.000019395098,0.0000072460707,0.000004476107,0.000047261266,8.6107053e-7,0.00013858137],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99691725,0.0013849781,0.00015113153,0.00040877901,0.00043276872,0.0007050359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895706,0.004986761,0.003559275,0.000411917,0.0006324272,0.00083899254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038141967,0.00019760455,0.0007051787,0.0035796596,0.0033798842,0.002505399,0.00079179025,0.0006083484,0.0039433646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013856623,0.00021799207,0.00026564684,0.0046407906,0.0033179594,0.0016678633,0.002545278,0.0010285489,0.00032167658],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023283807,0.0005129401,0.9173378,0.000118818076,0.00030278595,0.0012260352,0.03595506,0.0014941837,0.00083575014,0.012896772,0.0012985228,0.027788462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028117707,0.00009805026,0.96858805,0.00005610987,0.00005593602,0.00014350284,0.026016315,0.0013397204,0.00011447866,0.0014349744,0.0021095565,0.000015248865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03575808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06511341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03575808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025427893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011878732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07109988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2523113676","doi":"10.7202/1101141ar","title":"Les aspects juridiques de la redéfinition du statut politique et constitutionnel du Québec","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024130460785965792,"score_gpt":0.29740039814072805,"score_spread":0.27326993735476224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2523113676","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2187086,0.08210642,0.0035553381,0.23288785,0.0015733131,0.00011074301,0.00086587906,0.00004467941,0.46014726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9126012,0.0139973,0.0008195507,0.0069486443,0.00021521492,0.00004006411,0.00013800999,0.00001703155,0.0652231],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99714416,0.0006597004,0.00006387663,0.00022009789,0.00104407,0.0008681934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962768,0.0010223143,0.00024847637,0.00011080508,0.0018465832,0.0004950559],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037254572,0.00021901961,0.00025449222,0.0017473681,0.012414048,0.007888289,0.0010378042,0.002356505,0.007142491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077601764,0.0002908838,0.0002005057,0.003015256,0.010259166,0.0020943028,0.0014772107,0.0050133276,0.00025478212],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006347866,0.000031667238,0.012190741,0.00017930433,0.0000245937,0.00040205359,0.023507956,0.0007912953,0.0007337371,0.84059346,0.07198578,0.049496066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048922924,0.00004043525,0.12817067,0.0011818231,0.00008297764,0.00021098764,0.028893061,0.0013397417,0.0009947887,0.042757157,0.79610395,0.00017549371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9894995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99531615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08825488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08825488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10948182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64033693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2525314292","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3959","title":"The Moral Unity of Public Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Philosophy of law; Adjudication; Dignity; Jurisprudence; Public law; Political science; Analogy; Sociology; Political philosophy; Constitutionalism; Law and economics; Morality; Politics; Democracy; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.036241777053454584,"score_gpt":0.24241479684511122,"score_spread":0.20617301979165664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2525314292","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032380175,0.0042935316,0.053142365,0.15770058,0.0010516153,0.00008588189,0.00012365516,0.00021418845,0.75100803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95824116,0.00084059726,0.0055833766,0.005405093,0.0009585851,0.00009400206,0.00006877469,0.00010085584,0.02870748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880156,0.005157944,0.00033072554,0.0016889544,0.0029516488,0.0018550296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99171466,0.0026217266,0.00071283424,0.0022020694,0.0014482652,0.001300465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011277446,0.0004295615,0.0006221235,0.0018626784,0.012588185,0.019628339,0.0015200807,0.0064741634,0.0052791853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014665011,0.00050818414,0.0007018158,0.001259522,0.07011282,0.0126162255,0.0076587936,0.009365083,0.0009315667],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019389033,0.0000051350376,0.00005190499,0.000006089128,0.0000013834231,0.0000088262495,0.0012966834,0.00007744604,0.000022646263,0.9955705,0.001601146,0.0013563684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001096518,0.000008243991,0.00023541691,0.00004683157,0.000005108311,0.000025049449,0.0013241697,0.00032996744,0.00008415257,0.92895234,0.0689699,0.000007873023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014190145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009816679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019628339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015540191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01984495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1127525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2526842560","doi":"10.4337/9781785365263.00011","title":"Amendment and revision in the unmaking of constitutions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Reinterpretation; Constitutional amendment; Originalism; Amendment; Political science; Law; Skepticism; Presupposition; Scholarship; Constitutionalism; Epistemology; Sociology; Democracy; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.04395632204613078,"score_gpt":0.286041925199235,"score_spread":0.2420856031531042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2526842560","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016593985,0.021784693,0.012641038,0.009165765,0.0012244491,0.000060273975,0.00003605324,0.00006492617,0.93842894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8259355,0.011168613,0.007721549,0.00257983,0.0015373182,0.00018638335,0.00010644169,0.00014557097,0.15061885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.990211,0.0060601826,0.0003298088,0.0007136368,0.0019090655,0.000776319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939867,0.004096814,0.0002735613,0.0010369037,0.00048017595,0.00012582206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069861817,0.00035225204,0.00051378284,0.0021507854,0.004944308,0.00917712,0.0012952215,0.0019132064,0.0035334828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01364537,0.00032251398,0.0004546077,0.002216415,0.02516196,0.006887211,0.0028409641,0.005061362,0.00067248417],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004112714,0.0000023230057,0.000030169153,0.000015256371,9.231901e-7,0.00002143872,0.0017114719,0.00013074274,0.000040453804,0.9920798,0.0012648447,0.0046984646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009914189,0.000022621936,0.00041556757,0.00024741548,0.0000067137157,0.00010773123,0.0015739755,0.00044017073,0.00027277807,0.73774064,0.2591457,0.000016896673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004277581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044918014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00917712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005590686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004443789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040563524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528781944","doi":"","title":"Dynamic Regulatory Constitutionalism: Taking Legislation Seriously in the Enforcement of Economic and Social Rights","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Normative; Political science; Statutory law; Constitutionalism; Enforcement; Law; Law and economics; Social rights; Human rights; Politics; Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.012142457486695466,"score_gpt":0.2746214644257774,"score_spread":0.26247900693908194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528781944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043510914,0.0043483716,0.31271976,0.11680844,0.0012393626,0.00031065108,0.000057755748,0.00034130516,0.5206634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9401102,0.0014256805,0.031624176,0.0102250995,0.00073571794,0.0005270631,0.00004098288,0.00014241341,0.01516865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96514654,0.01960201,0.0012587551,0.0045342767,0.006833113,0.0026252968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818618,0.011501815,0.001467826,0.0026330012,0.0017924361,0.00074312167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0321105,0.00074273575,0.0007769521,0.0023020632,0.007865033,0.012724199,0.00358165,0.008890498,0.0028199272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030974671,0.0008452483,0.001119101,0.001360161,0.07073145,0.016723558,0.0091642095,0.012811585,0.00048121877],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002108938,0.0000052825094,0.00005758092,0.000010793875,0.0000021982883,0.000027670716,0.0013564078,0.00019548567,0.0001401843,0.9961702,0.00026792957,0.0017641503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020384317,0.000021842667,0.00018676263,0.00010885242,0.000011226412,0.000053609525,0.00080509635,0.0008934086,0.00040779254,0.9597468,0.037722245,0.00002199929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008747802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066651227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0321105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010602674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01769385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16981858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529130738","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3038","title":"Compact is Back: The Supreme Court of Canada’s Revival of the Compact Theory of Confederation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Constitutional interpretation; Constitutional theory; Interpretation (philosophy); Politics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03738853155582945,"score_gpt":0.27225591168980307,"score_spread":0.23486738013397362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529130738","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11176941,0.009797384,0.008654006,0.24697354,0.0020329088,0.000107423104,0.00058398413,0.00014369453,0.6199376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91370535,0.0018506641,0.0015566628,0.02935865,0.00035270693,0.000036901394,0.000099339086,0.000069873386,0.052969795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923056,0.0009982458,0.00013600016,0.00082521164,0.003817509,0.0019174308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99381715,0.002548461,0.00016666284,0.00037637958,0.0025735328,0.000517668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056274845,0.00038508567,0.0006710271,0.001705112,0.02883751,0.015541298,0.0030004692,0.009711875,0.0040194876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017178254,0.00046381316,0.0005545502,0.0026686126,0.024289116,0.004606344,0.0037797703,0.01223154,0.00023042454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011963361,0.0000032524422,0.0002775551,0.000012654666,0.0000058711307,0.00008625062,0.00449459,0.00022897281,0.000059655642,0.97748953,0.014164224,0.003165461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008632376,0.000027790084,0.00445125,0.00045013323,0.00011071798,0.00014436244,0.0126933865,0.0033367474,0.0010108477,0.3914758,0.5859991,0.00021367516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9823992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9844432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87152576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12847427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13618919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9321504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529437961","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1184","title":"\"Other Worlds are Actual\": Tully on the Imperial Roles of Modern Constitutional Democracy","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Politics; Law; Democracy; Globalization; Political science; Sovereignty; International law; Sociology; Political economy","score_opus":0.037564204941585,"score_gpt":0.2742108952086062,"score_spread":0.2366466902670212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529437961","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09826149,0.02390598,0.020284971,0.14194624,0.0006514521,0.00004214533,0.000043679007,0.00006820355,0.7147959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9726744,0.0034532908,0.0019644636,0.007849181,0.0003749312,0.000039865703,0.000012271335,0.000033385717,0.013598108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99418324,0.004127258,0.00007662431,0.0003667267,0.0007772383,0.00046884132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994056,0.0044843056,0.00030976013,0.0005162504,0.00034380492,0.00028992654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052647437,0.0002608633,0.0003802639,0.0011033618,0.0090547595,0.009621426,0.00057744,0.0028974544,0.0019170793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067936014,0.00025988472,0.00023979704,0.0009134476,0.054281127,0.0118191615,0.0052177864,0.0062895743,0.00026522044],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003337995,0.000005000035,0.000048033377,0.000007260141,7.390281e-7,0.000012851548,0.0050697494,0.000032375814,0.00001584864,0.99220055,0.0013415384,0.0012627266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011028753,0.000010985148,0.00022082237,0.000100196434,0.0000049281316,0.000049626193,0.0061470815,0.00021055531,0.00011330142,0.910111,0.083008975,0.000011549108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005569872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007198493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009621426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053131627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00397361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03854984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529867073","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1396","title":"Book Notes: Laws Dream of a Common Knowledge, by Mariana Valverde","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dream; Law; Political science; Biology; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.01837483454743498,"score_gpt":0.29579932341040394,"score_spread":0.27742448886296894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529867073","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00078252295,0.09266379,0.0019472584,0.6387705,0.019962061,0.00001990295,0.00018100004,0.00009818387,0.24557485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.033470925,0.0426398,0.0019902696,0.16228157,0.018342936,0.00008347325,0.00017373674,0.00038623193,0.74063104],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897623,0.00031876363,0.000044647328,0.00020083069,0.0003738569,0.000085698295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99771655,0.001566015,0.00007411973,0.00015672258,0.00031827117,0.00016838576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016660865,0.0004463328,0.00048456588,0.0012160039,0.005573986,0.008950517,0.0010963284,0.0061866627,0.015945408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071125096,0.00048821932,0.00029080338,0.0014410143,0.008350301,0.012932568,0.0025027357,0.01010162,0.0060828794],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032352125,0.0000050623385,0.000030849176,0.000023367178,0.000001251167,0.000015669006,0.0005951801,0.000033238517,0.0000142441695,0.1528977,0.840095,0.006285258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037541217,0.0000021982087,0.000105467894,0.00011725267,0.0000013352239,0.00002868226,0.00057838834,0.000036117242,0.00002950329,0.044244833,0.95484626,0.000006198863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02659577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06671688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02659577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041966825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004094034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0533427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2530328329","doi":"","title":"Unity in the Eye of the Beholder? Reasons for Decision in Theory and Practice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Corporate governance; Welfare; Scale (ratio); Function (biology); Public relations; Qualitative research; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Management; Social science; Geography","score_opus":0.021246594289346832,"score_gpt":0.3419382025029806,"score_spread":0.3206916082136338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2530328329","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14471053,0.010059778,0.2682023,0.18805528,0.0010080709,0.00018730725,0.00015176329,0.0003302752,0.38729462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98445165,0.00056843716,0.010665381,0.0013849277,0.000088957284,0.00007370319,0.000019069616,0.000071685965,0.0026761543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96137804,0.026987888,0.001395409,0.0039263135,0.0040720906,0.0022403016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9486816,0.036932055,0.0029456136,0.0076107895,0.0023332287,0.0014967651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040617447,0.0005513639,0.0010613928,0.003486849,0.010950008,0.023105437,0.0025446306,0.0073065534,0.004846539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.064727984,0.00080889254,0.0011797795,0.0024378095,0.13028492,0.034535207,0.009763266,0.0075407047,0.0007118037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007094674,0.000005028311,0.00052135147,0.000026014997,0.0000049454843,0.000046554575,0.016872058,0.00016066314,0.00003487861,0.97907877,0.000532634,0.0027099086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011271434,0.000007260228,0.0003013303,0.00014616294,0.0000067838573,0.00004036837,0.015746925,0.0004886411,0.000096615906,0.9598802,0.023256512,0.00001795115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010735579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00846791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040617447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013198437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012142364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21480817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2530995183","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2995","title":"A Theory of Quasi-Constitutional Legislation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"Statute; Legislation; Constitution; Law; Political science; Lawmaking; Constitutional law; Constitutional review; Constitutional economics; Supreme court; Constitutional theory; Legislature","score_opus":0.03449057492597083,"score_gpt":0.2851507907978369,"score_spread":0.25066021587186604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2530995183","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014163484,0.003144739,0.15018085,0.019985622,0.00037478545,0.00015502748,0.00031062242,0.00014877938,0.8115361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8629306,0.0034123654,0.046904672,0.0072801462,0.00081094966,0.0004950865,0.00030765167,0.0001343837,0.077724144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955842,0.0014338836,0.0001280295,0.0007343493,0.00133833,0.0007811966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99688005,0.0015287226,0.00029027587,0.0004983986,0.00064054504,0.00016201462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005441579,0.0005026902,0.0004926888,0.0022709244,0.005815789,0.0055116755,0.0020681648,0.003337778,0.008610125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046220687,0.000404684,0.0010553483,0.0021539642,0.039531086,0.00657336,0.0022116536,0.004634229,0.0011897257],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.7843357e-7,6.2336716e-7,0.000012176135,0.0000018687208,3.2132564e-7,0.0000042313477,0.00009093671,0.000037775648,0.000004437207,0.99952304,0.0001302079,0.00019417008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007583738,0.0000054470256,0.00019462724,0.000040974548,0.0000043848963,0.000027688619,0.0001409459,0.000589617,0.000056969235,0.94915926,0.049767006,0.000005394338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.080174066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053764205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.080174066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014382816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014312395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15941477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531627403","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1144","title":"Book Review: The Transformation of the Supreme Court Of Canada: An Empirical Examination, by Donald R. Songer","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Empirical examination; Law; Political science; Transformation (genetics); Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Chemistry; Actuarial science","score_opus":0.02140654501617092,"score_gpt":0.2815864057986351,"score_spread":0.2601798607824642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531627403","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006540276,0.7016673,0.00016704683,0.22987707,0.0117631825,0.0000413207,0.0030240775,0.000032547385,0.046887167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1366778,0.7013269,0.000435009,0.057493,0.012849225,0.00008590737,0.0025747253,0.00012494742,0.08843252],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790883,0.00025441498,0.00006602659,0.00014833147,0.0013589378,0.00026356414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9839992,0.0043659657,0.000686514,0.00023458098,0.009909338,0.00080440316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015744563,0.00045026388,0.000780124,0.0047491062,0.004744515,0.0062236483,0.0015359275,0.0024211477,0.00889413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01732768,0.00035394236,0.00026906916,0.018066794,0.0027987661,0.0021030277,0.00063967344,0.0020491534,0.0012904247],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010036134,0.0000046185123,0.0012080952,0.00028745175,0.000012813122,0.000027250537,0.00029234067,0.00011706743,0.000015151334,0.004306572,0.9792179,0.0145007875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019200166,0.0000135558885,0.028871454,0.0025808932,0.00007939606,0.0000874516,0.0023237874,0.00019970069,0.00009197605,0.0032351464,0.96245605,0.00004131583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9302639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9771165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06973612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036364857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08424529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2638467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531893546","doi":"","title":"Comparative Matters: A Response to Interlocutors","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Conversation; Constitutional law; Comparative law; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.032455940943696505,"score_gpt":0.2972083145682079,"score_spread":0.2647523736245114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531893546","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017507675,0.012470519,0.0009890879,0.9393012,0.01893083,0.00001798266,0.000029837245,0.00003810365,0.026471643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07925013,0.00762105,0.0015278694,0.819878,0.030367782,0.00020575983,0.000054469154,0.00036785574,0.060727086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94327056,0.03634468,0.0015044975,0.0071059945,0.008362712,0.0034114807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8914028,0.09015679,0.0029808488,0.004058149,0.008122989,0.0032785116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.045837574,0.001495006,0.0024874,0.0030735938,0.029706925,0.027445015,0.008769537,0.04994771,0.012294595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10007384,0.001349539,0.0015032471,0.0061263684,0.055823844,0.039171293,0.021897627,0.05711667,0.0027225346],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024228842,0.000016940838,0.00017094014,0.000106989566,0.0000069646626,0.00041689322,0.04217986,0.000080566184,0.00008840493,0.4821488,0.4669186,0.0078408085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011535378,0.000013768539,0.00013054322,0.00037853542,0.0000051640986,0.000118087,0.027708113,0.0001328458,0.00010079463,0.050639838,0.9207325,0.000028372382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010441804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0129246265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04994771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022177698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014773875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24241513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2532410346","doi":"","title":"Commonalities, intersections, and challenges for the scrutiny and interpretation of legislation in Trans-Tasman jurisdictions and beyond","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian Parliamentary Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Legislation; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Commonwealth; Charter; Human rights; Law; Scope (computer science); Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.06420674695101623,"score_gpt":0.32489390141247376,"score_spread":0.2606871544614575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2532410346","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6224324,0.04336936,0.017090734,0.12938176,0.0006217456,0.00015938902,0.00009211304,0.0000803019,0.18677223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99353856,0.0015525325,0.0015967904,0.0015986296,0.00005472328,0.000026562295,0.000008347253,0.00001568077,0.0016082395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9499777,0.034785125,0.0020305158,0.0034585723,0.0046428666,0.005105276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9645068,0.020576367,0.0032885175,0.0022694394,0.0077029993,0.0016558766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04643541,0.0002409675,0.0008221983,0.003584701,0.011625633,0.015254407,0.0024270504,0.0028674502,0.0017089995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037740145,0.00076586095,0.0005798656,0.0041068955,0.049080107,0.0076890117,0.008046779,0.0049383766,0.00014651369],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035574976,0.000018404908,0.008488025,0.0003961032,0.00008181905,0.00073654426,0.43663788,0.00057689263,0.0010098286,0.516146,0.0024972542,0.033375725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019374815,0.00010596966,0.065825775,0.0027387047,0.00011818704,0.0007895364,0.55755466,0.0015240398,0.0012351653,0.21337733,0.15651791,0.00019344299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22184187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35962528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22184187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032105736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040332556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4411012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2533097192","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781316585481","title":"Toward an Informal Account of Legal Interpretation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Ideology; Scope (computer science); Judicial interpretation; Law; Intervention (counseling); Epistemology; Nothing; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics; Politics","score_opus":0.026301018332326658,"score_gpt":0.24022275146615835,"score_spread":0.2139217331338317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2533097192","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009056826,0.0042795152,0.08300854,0.034023527,0.0005740463,0.000051748095,0.00011196674,0.00015550395,0.8687385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71391904,0.005718625,0.03342459,0.008217388,0.0017714849,0.00045428742,0.00039610206,0.00042680508,0.23567167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99624556,0.00199394,0.00013313652,0.00031013435,0.001005563,0.0003116343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99621886,0.0020563912,0.00028991574,0.0007326626,0.00055273983,0.00014945774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036432699,0.0005741959,0.00044181902,0.0016123503,0.0033455135,0.00939994,0.001437522,0.0026684096,0.0062848735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005273039,0.00030797787,0.0005527299,0.0017899794,0.020401457,0.012401579,0.0038553288,0.0071824593,0.0013886258],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.838171e-7,0.0000021674186,0.000019277119,0.00000564904,4.524594e-7,0.000007690831,0.0005490993,0.00008673053,0.000012548826,0.99706846,0.0011789397,0.0010680396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035363823,0.000004141537,0.00009525472,0.00005517249,0.0000021959174,0.000024111307,0.0006079085,0.0006555543,0.000046757083,0.93992573,0.05857573,0.0000038640615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033619823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040073767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00939994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054484583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048385053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03953153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2533569193","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1181","title":"Book Notes: Weak Courts, Strong Rights: Judicial Review and Social Welfare Rights in Comparative Constitutional Law, by Mark Tushnet","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Social rights; Judicial review; Welfare rights; Constitutional law; Welfare; Human rights","score_opus":0.03544476319818882,"score_gpt":0.2993659918528684,"score_spread":0.2639212286546796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2533569193","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023287951,0.108952396,0.009351884,0.586217,0.012750167,0.00006525013,0.000504158,0.00013662434,0.27969372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08697262,0.09347308,0.012904519,0.1755528,0.04333616,0.00046306537,0.000517575,0.0004370395,0.58634317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990945,0.0004157652,0.000039356328,0.0001260479,0.00028178477,0.000042635947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98857135,0.010301934,0.00015873542,0.00019638891,0.000626465,0.00014514005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027378441,0.000517429,0.0007160587,0.0023892245,0.0029557098,0.005197138,0.0014921878,0.0059841895,0.025268061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073740724,0.00065252295,0.00032310886,0.00380534,0.011738061,0.011989584,0.0012122858,0.0050969687,0.0038788072],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000076283795,0.00001764763,0.000098427656,0.00007104274,0.0000030883932,0.000014960461,0.0004936458,0.00012585452,0.000032965145,0.52639693,0.4617484,0.0109894425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024620254,0.000013846373,0.00066846656,0.00038795875,0.000009659212,0.000049389244,0.0009083584,0.00034532053,0.00010705308,0.44067103,0.55678844,0.000025882766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018364888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06562435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025268061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033629762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030265208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.084530056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W253428692","doi":"","title":"The \"Dialogue Theory\" of Constitutional Review in Canada : Recent Challenges","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"法政理論","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.056688460603065795,"score_gpt":0.2855042642556903,"score_spread":0.22881580365262452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W253428692","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028222589,0.032283746,0.003691597,0.7902997,0.0015440068,0.0000953415,0.00045018984,0.000093205956,0.14331959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8592579,0.022136442,0.0035862124,0.08221284,0.0021016863,0.00019543088,0.00017097412,0.00014296174,0.030195622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96144044,0.014072704,0.0010123615,0.0041387305,0.011237122,0.008098726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8632554,0.088734955,0.0035444414,0.0025664673,0.028599983,0.013298777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.045709852,0.0007836829,0.002777007,0.007436273,0.034530368,0.03465633,0.008642209,0.015963241,0.016180623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11724107,0.0009794949,0.0009105474,0.0161716,0.06243462,0.016857877,0.008174194,0.019025795,0.0006759437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004198233,0.000044530803,0.0012285551,0.00020032797,0.000024744362,0.000050413593,0.004621992,0.00062295626,0.000031192492,0.9346026,0.036229957,0.022300756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021700896,0.000053472962,0.009756123,0.0012243813,0.000099631376,0.00006346015,0.022328358,0.0034897975,0.00029795512,0.64765763,0.31455424,0.00025792065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.987518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9898844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27379966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.27379966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5066891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84228945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2540366584","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1373","title":"Book Notes: The Lawmakers: Judicial Power and the Shaping of Canadian Federalism, by John T. Saywell","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Power (physics); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Physics","score_opus":0.024005789695604022,"score_gpt":0.2560515465511589,"score_spread":0.2320457568555549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2540366584","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029428853,0.09302725,0.0020309703,0.6826898,0.0069129155,0.000024422457,0.00084079243,0.000084150066,0.21144688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.117892765,0.10968034,0.0040786606,0.11196092,0.007851155,0.000059950307,0.00058063073,0.00021943964,0.6476762],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994978,0.00007524305,0.000014194261,0.000055206023,0.00027298945,0.00008462474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864036,0.00052068394,0.000040625862,0.000042439897,0.000630439,0.00012543445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009382974,0.00041047958,0.0002830901,0.0016769959,0.008126515,0.0050019687,0.0010668102,0.002689819,0.019393705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029162187,0.00035546676,0.00027429458,0.003772065,0.00671282,0.0048541566,0.0007378588,0.003783751,0.0021279168],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061569103,0.0000053235976,0.00025903757,0.000042905598,0.000001845295,0.000021038659,0.0008957779,0.0001266935,0.000051090872,0.10304153,0.88638103,0.00916754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007511093,0.00000438272,0.0019958925,0.00020572015,0.0000067426026,0.00003344074,0.0030332587,0.00014430392,0.00013119738,0.04873651,0.94567645,0.000024543424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8394787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9581346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16052133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016431214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021554397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32293332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2541255717","doi":"","title":"De la structure constitutionnelle dans le Renvoi relatif à la réforme du Sénat: vers une Gestalt constitutionnelle? (Constitutional Structure and the Senate Reference: Towards a Canadian Constitutional Gestalt?)","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Gestalt psychology; Humanities; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.010459223017638943,"score_gpt":0.23721355908406963,"score_spread":0.2267543360664307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2541255717","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060506273,0.01209638,0.012973846,0.05095602,0.00028757573,0.000060595747,0.00044198424,0.000074219315,0.86260307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9440742,0.0037787189,0.002399411,0.0014385474,0.00009556872,0.000027923013,0.000094510906,0.0000396723,0.048051447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969542,0.0008654284,0.000054094075,0.00037557326,0.0009460086,0.0008046765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983191,0.0005171555,0.0001249927,0.00018337638,0.0007064853,0.00014892677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028075527,0.00031137784,0.00033213975,0.0020767536,0.009387933,0.008466349,0.0014116269,0.001568188,0.0098313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005053185,0.0002553507,0.00034975223,0.0039798045,0.030592585,0.0040332265,0.0025987062,0.0033287704,0.00051018153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002603375,0.0000010216162,0.00010491187,0.00000836733,0.0000011585638,0.000012685097,0.0016231977,0.000117976284,0.000033319706,0.99523723,0.00094872987,0.0019087386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002950818,0.000025226449,0.011389775,0.00036616597,0.00003413262,0.00011750172,0.012248116,0.0014230792,0.00068730675,0.5482237,0.4253524,0.000103036306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90851766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9374395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93024874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.069751285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054782663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50608337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2543164750","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1106","title":"Book Notes: Making Our Democracy Work: A Judge's View, by Stephen Breyer","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Work (physics); Political science; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Law and economics; Engineering; Mechanical engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.02317457589153891,"score_gpt":0.30631276461468493,"score_spread":0.283138188723146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2543164750","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000689274,0.028718658,0.0011626382,0.8879517,0.010896532,0.00002378611,0.00008732352,0.000034141896,0.07043594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.040597882,0.02685342,0.0020368737,0.5729758,0.021201408,0.00016064414,0.00010660767,0.00020638273,0.335861],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972978,0.0009078121,0.000116109,0.00036773406,0.001028996,0.0002815354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907079,0.0071544233,0.00023345565,0.00021254332,0.0012995964,0.0003920805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043074116,0.00064918416,0.00084184186,0.0014546834,0.010662571,0.013220452,0.0017575199,0.019011006,0.010465431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014142976,0.00077541685,0.00045759106,0.002372728,0.013714526,0.012424686,0.002222565,0.02536235,0.0034730432],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006024871,0.000011850247,0.00006344956,0.000032109867,0.0000024034173,0.000024987787,0.0007300116,0.00005745758,0.000025925934,0.1602769,0.8348756,0.003893236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002225242,0.000017139182,0.0005062488,0.000389546,0.000011519405,0.00004101278,0.0024116323,0.00016834222,0.00015073443,0.11307821,0.8831727,0.000030822088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052495226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15587178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052495226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005917893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008372093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.104379356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2543956597","doi":"10.3138/utq.85.3.481","title":"<i>The Court of Appeal for Ontario: Defining the Right of Appeal, 1792–2013</i> by Christopher Moore","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.006955729131182362,"score_gpt":0.21063044874440257,"score_spread":0.2036747196132202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2543956597","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053157895,0.13950184,0.00083339383,0.56912285,0.008649658,0.0001872585,0.0037412525,0.00005987813,0.27258798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22240393,0.082786046,0.0026985814,0.23476659,0.008831429,0.0003787723,0.0016801228,0.0003130806,0.44614142],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99311805,0.0007914546,0.00041844454,0.0005736836,0.0035578182,0.001540594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934716,0.0019419005,0.0005047114,0.00019287915,0.0030634156,0.000825434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004504237,0.0006561843,0.00051845243,0.0020290744,0.02034412,0.010924687,0.0022871264,0.010512373,0.011810732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013048624,0.0012336699,0.0006889809,0.0049540303,0.015733534,0.0054797214,0.0029936146,0.009607324,0.002217952],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013026184,0.0000075641537,0.0006010574,0.00008291282,0.000005948383,0.00007331252,0.003921489,0.00007287531,0.00009164091,0.1063573,0.8853829,0.0033899576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009858632,0.0000029475736,0.005331979,0.0003748916,0.000007974342,0.00003500706,0.0028097115,0.000054932105,0.00007667129,0.0079470165,0.98329675,0.000052187686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9772094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9925419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13607253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13607253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17029499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98727995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2546096680","doi":"10.1111/lapo.12062","title":"The Paradox of Docket Control: Empowering Judges, Frustrating Refugees","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Law; German; Political science; Control (management); Constitutional court; Judicial review; Economics; Constitution","score_opus":0.01739250255270737,"score_gpt":0.3375086650642659,"score_spread":0.32011616251155856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2546096680","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5086177,0.005247306,0.0069218413,0.36515102,0.0014033723,0.00006432393,0.00005376767,0.00012956446,0.112411246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97644085,0.00071576086,0.00038377653,0.017135581,0.0003157561,0.000030107525,0.000008475034,0.00003856162,0.0049310736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97333217,0.014539032,0.0009882619,0.0022915497,0.0036157412,0.0052332203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97566754,0.015621355,0.0021791519,0.0011288709,0.001634943,0.0037681428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022507343,0.00032056926,0.00053286075,0.001253387,0.018911382,0.013636444,0.0018340993,0.0077948803,0.0049746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052761715,0.0007094892,0.00040012368,0.0010739015,0.035643335,0.006997501,0.010298002,0.0110632405,0.00078516296],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015636349,0.00013266993,0.009707266,0.00021491738,0.000051276675,0.003849505,0.2571278,0.00070398574,0.0024984204,0.60858727,0.07080093,0.04616957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031307127,0.00021035857,0.013068723,0.00083482574,0.00008255345,0.0022281304,0.3582948,0.0015387939,0.0015501057,0.17533383,0.44623026,0.00031449273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026211342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0380866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026211342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00933355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011088891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11903161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2547042486","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2016.1244451","title":"The meta-constitution: amendment, recognition, and the continuing puzzle of supreme law in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Constitutional law; Limited government; Judicial review","score_opus":0.039699736664320764,"score_gpt":0.23535951758762744,"score_spread":0.19565978092330666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2547042486","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18433124,0.010485194,0.010761487,0.12910622,0.0006392259,0.00010653144,0.00042374822,0.00017020009,0.6639762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9705142,0.0014727557,0.0020774144,0.0058349636,0.00007935773,0.000024683839,0.000060539835,0.00005015283,0.019886043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98997796,0.001362428,0.00024620027,0.00103275,0.0038729915,0.003507723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99233776,0.0029921024,0.00034437,0.00065805827,0.0026602808,0.0010075067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006169682,0.0002731229,0.00080846256,0.0021675404,0.026463576,0.016634334,0.0027039677,0.005097987,0.0047048633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015388603,0.000508918,0.00065705535,0.003842407,0.028891543,0.0047909296,0.004648575,0.0097473925,0.00025718758],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008868407,0.000004480818,0.0007916695,0.000016720847,0.000006886886,0.00012231349,0.004307696,0.00035260723,0.00010686886,0.9832761,0.0052156737,0.0057901302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074902535,0.000031313033,0.014739387,0.00052603526,0.000117836535,0.00024233012,0.016034918,0.004838064,0.00114224,0.4708362,0.49115872,0.0002580894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98828584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99197364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1674814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1674814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22544064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9656036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2547478282","doi":"10.31228/osf.io/v9tz4","title":"Four Unconstitutional Constitutions and their Democratic Foundations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Democracy; Law; Political science; Action (physics); Constitutional amendment; Constitutional law; Politics","score_opus":0.056870182346047,"score_gpt":0.3151494233881404,"score_spread":0.2582792410420934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2547478282","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11020054,0.0035953075,0.038706493,0.025620494,0.0003662095,0.0001486633,0.00012545439,0.000087418644,0.8211495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98743963,0.00038082237,0.0047188094,0.0006563503,0.0001075357,0.00011012657,0.000031429234,0.000017001188,0.0065382263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98888236,0.0054324553,0.0005171992,0.0011693886,0.0024669336,0.0015316186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895997,0.0056702406,0.0011768343,0.0017304863,0.0012388742,0.0005838083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008627294,0.000359648,0.00052990916,0.0033055535,0.009996931,0.010515468,0.0012413658,0.0041721337,0.0046665617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013780932,0.00052188494,0.0007452903,0.0021483696,0.056018967,0.0069423853,0.0076845633,0.008086931,0.00041981976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017678965,0.0000030741876,0.000065353386,0.0000023020214,0.0000012742112,0.000008539109,0.00027142034,0.00004053621,0.000013654974,0.9989009,0.0001252386,0.0005658639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016766757,0.000007823963,0.00039473755,0.000025062433,0.000008486985,0.000024624296,0.00033837592,0.00035695016,0.000108414824,0.98920447,0.009505191,0.000009123293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033928326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035477441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010515468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006475403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050995015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046982586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2549769496","doi":"10.21991/c9f09d","title":"Symposium Summary: The State of Canada's Constitutional Democracy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Constitution; State (computer science); Public service; Constitutional law; Political science; Corporate governance; Liberal democracy; Law; Service (business); Rule of law; Public administration; Sociology; Management; Politics","score_opus":0.013421334471025649,"score_gpt":0.24380214807491726,"score_spread":0.23038081360389162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2549769496","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059900936,0.04363809,0.00084179395,0.555153,0.19587699,0.000756852,0.006625499,0.0003439424,0.19077376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07310284,0.03123741,0.0015085993,0.07776393,0.044252332,0.0005234464,0.005375856,0.00021958604,0.76601607],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980294,0.00010447812,0.000060392147,0.0002492161,0.0010089336,0.00054754625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954295,0.00027545716,0.00007447143,0.000105110616,0.0023936017,0.0017217955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024546178,0.000782083,0.00064374943,0.0019098605,0.011147083,0.009042005,0.0019831934,0.0075998395,0.055529766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037808674,0.00041711112,0.00063812046,0.0022301609,0.0018289846,0.0018536804,0.0024118526,0.005120803,0.005833785],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016921418,0.000009387171,0.00016064441,0.0001235275,0.000002804185,0.00005510994,0.0002581839,0.000041235544,0.00017919797,0.002609808,0.99019086,0.0063523683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007159304,0.0000066926177,0.0014657038,0.00011917799,0.0000042356432,0.000024287638,0.0006370074,0.00003885275,0.000077169985,0.00041658085,0.9971903,0.000012783536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.79110676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9003109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20889324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038943548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.102954894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4202469},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2550987653","doi":"10.21991/c95h3t","title":"Judicial Review of Ministerial Advice to the Crown","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Advice (programming); Confusion; Nothing; Law; Action (physics); Power (physics); Political science; Politics; Sovereignty; Legal advice; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.025708336971098103,"score_gpt":0.3016147067215856,"score_spread":0.2759063697504875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2550987653","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03304788,0.03599381,0.0024361988,0.33550397,0.010893827,0.00034607042,0.0012140607,0.00024638433,0.58031785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58582044,0.015608246,0.003048892,0.09937933,0.005030144,0.00023623335,0.00059541606,0.00020183362,0.2900795],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9739603,0.0044225273,0.001259435,0.0020301822,0.013245453,0.00508213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9557525,0.015654739,0.0013329126,0.0021645264,0.023076177,0.0020191448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019580618,0.00038191638,0.00087151345,0.0028675827,0.012191978,0.009083406,0.0036708799,0.012086883,0.006855523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09182412,0.00067073165,0.00049509405,0.0036790525,0.0064210654,0.0019604557,0.0021381583,0.011472966,0.0014437985],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003465967,0.000028341112,0.0008824787,0.00019031407,0.000028057633,0.00041072766,0.003523039,0.00022362596,0.00041473852,0.47684705,0.49613717,0.021279784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035531026,0.000017467939,0.003995762,0.00035651334,0.000042720712,0.00007328862,0.0016860208,0.0004918913,0.0006271557,0.024709135,0.9679092,0.000055331224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.53143746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67888606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53143746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034514975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.087931335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.942644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2551431252","doi":"10.21991/c9nh35","title":"Legislative Vehicles and Formalized Charter Review","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Parliament; Constitutionality; Charter; Legislature; Political science; Law; Compliance (psychology); Public administration; Constitution; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.027164514875267373,"score_gpt":0.29288565910362424,"score_spread":0.26572114422835685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2551431252","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12956011,0.07490031,0.16267402,0.26591846,0.006663612,0.0048579765,0.0030005586,0.0019009954,0.350524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84392834,0.020673173,0.07687224,0.01584285,0.0012491466,0.0016748612,0.0016265908,0.00040240484,0.037730437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.84250885,0.07960243,0.013655542,0.010668458,0.044387206,0.009177541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6659234,0.1609111,0.027699202,0.03588795,0.10246247,0.0071158707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12864003,0.0003552052,0.0012066764,0.012814281,0.009200156,0.017571054,0.0048975446,0.003993422,0.00361695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25818852,0.0011409259,0.00065590197,0.011993019,0.014731763,0.007930157,0.0063485247,0.0053243735,0.000724018],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006622551,0.00006811992,0.0042280853,0.0009985456,0.00006353522,0.00036232756,0.022294097,0.0013402492,0.0008814798,0.76710504,0.04614952,0.1564428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010430284,0.00013273646,0.013149447,0.0048127905,0.00013474873,0.00022595645,0.0109937545,0.0024728638,0.0028953017,0.11435798,0.85043263,0.00028742224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24921326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40518734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24921326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046814308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1667377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6803216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2552659060","doi":"10.21991/c9d101","title":"A Recent History of Government Responses to Constitutional Litigation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Constitution; Settlement (finance); Political science; Witness; Power (physics); Law; Politics; Constitutional right; Constitutional law; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.036030059284368705,"score_gpt":0.27597178288593255,"score_spread":0.23994172360156385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2552659060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06278431,0.10427242,0.0016297296,0.15651225,0.0031766219,0.000058329304,0.00023432424,0.00008488111,0.67124724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80502605,0.06842496,0.00093003496,0.05417734,0.0024929112,0.000061242084,0.00020572335,0.000096511016,0.06858518],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934337,0.002696473,0.00020587424,0.00063394685,0.0014337163,0.0015963706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879233,0.007994669,0.0010615371,0.0005923877,0.001634149,0.00079391204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004892911,0.00024146405,0.00033335536,0.0034446483,0.012628325,0.010259908,0.0010491457,0.006194971,0.008976198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013041735,0.00026892347,0.000268975,0.008143956,0.015866151,0.0040043364,0.0030170972,0.005806247,0.000886973],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079116006,0.0000648398,0.0051134485,0.00062284304,0.00002965303,0.0011400824,0.10579782,0.00021532887,0.00048177197,0.661844,0.10089432,0.12371681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025447375,0.000013156245,0.004060057,0.00028667436,0.0000050140047,0.00015786297,0.017326185,0.000032515007,0.00016464255,0.0060772747,0.9718602,0.000013954875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13278595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2825906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13278595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020513287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011219776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2640261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2553437117","doi":"10.21991/c9895f","title":"Political Accountability in Appointments to the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Legislature; Politics; Law; Accountability; Reputation; Supreme Court Decisions","score_opus":0.024116853473701298,"score_gpt":0.2826322086586384,"score_spread":0.2585153551849371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2553437117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5313331,0.0011434387,0.0013857549,0.06976156,0.00083087594,0.00022968781,0.0006318355,0.00012545008,0.39455837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9715826,0.00016195072,0.00022960504,0.0020001782,0.00008361884,0.000019644078,0.000049367543,0.00002051291,0.02585259],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9800577,0.0027639682,0.00039253742,0.0014111347,0.0053168284,0.010057792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97552866,0.008316491,0.002191792,0.0006375061,0.0076023554,0.005723199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008526297,0.00018963475,0.000481092,0.0023228896,0.027713263,0.0105902115,0.0017950023,0.0035928732,0.012609119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045026787,0.00045115687,0.00032144022,0.0032247014,0.0059257695,0.001551369,0.003842166,0.0055795494,0.00054897397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029824377,0.00020858433,0.087838404,0.00015861067,0.00011656734,0.0026333733,0.08883688,0.0025079583,0.0020119098,0.6076775,0.13913985,0.06857211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012020484,0.000113229224,0.31672448,0.00031527007,0.00013801373,0.00022202106,0.08093617,0.0060159992,0.0024090647,0.04232847,0.5503427,0.00033439754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9785971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.991905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8821004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11789958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15056245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85542536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2553661545","doi":"10.1017/gov.2016.36","title":"Comparing Same-Sex Marriage in Australia and Canada: Institutions and Political Will","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Government and Opposition","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Politics; Democracy; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.04514752763321838,"score_gpt":0.2827636946839993,"score_spread":0.23761616705078092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2553661545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9686386,0.000777211,0.00010597856,0.0025040226,0.00002102078,0.000030139232,0.0002944439,0.000003979637,0.027624484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99614644,0.0005174517,0.00009264008,0.00020085013,0.0000049473324,0.000009025977,0.00017605686,0.000003827485,0.002848642],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968726,0.00032791594,0.000065556174,0.00018174395,0.0009599211,0.0015922587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938545,0.0006843852,0.0009804987,0.00015243147,0.0022347558,0.0020935046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015006942,0.0001313756,0.0003632121,0.0030578063,0.009752457,0.0034749876,0.00091460673,0.0006227084,0.0031968546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007498072,0.00013811469,0.0002619245,0.005217999,0.003264264,0.0010298501,0.0032339718,0.0018382287,0.00014268851],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019888554,0.0002336629,0.7599669,0.00008854199,0.00009034094,0.0005673817,0.1139995,0.00066998653,0.00042746484,0.06861912,0.006781661,0.04835653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000084243775,0.00003398724,0.8964512,0.00009505894,0.000023227778,0.000081982114,0.08213156,0.00048987503,0.00018033564,0.0013823524,0.019076405,0.000045651857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9906757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9963374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059170365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059170365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059527367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42931306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2553866482","doi":"10.82308/33833","title":"The use of social science evidence in constitutional adjudication: overcoming the challenges of the adversarial system","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Adversarial system; Adjudication; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.08602033592604312,"score_gpt":0.2821905082258253,"score_spread":0.19617017229978218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2553866482","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10642951,0.020816632,0.2317251,0.32692537,0.0015287622,0.000465632,0.00008180365,0.0001298105,0.31189743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9538866,0.004583004,0.02834887,0.00938166,0.000622561,0.0001678215,0.0000134726315,0.00004387842,0.002952135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7732823,0.17698638,0.0046929875,0.0053227986,0.03427908,0.005436518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.49547303,0.46049777,0.010393693,0.013803432,0.01783831,0.0019937486],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.22224127,0.00056233915,0.0013124357,0.008349961,0.017065845,0.025568718,0.0042249863,0.007247296,0.0015792164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2676659,0.0010831407,0.00065028423,0.0040133093,0.10881588,0.018306892,0.017154835,0.010949328,0.00029920245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015836522,0.000020559912,0.001699433,0.00014352181,0.000029294577,0.00019168617,0.02030717,0.00073529046,0.00020759548,0.94459337,0.0021415434,0.029914657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057033874,0.00010975402,0.003731046,0.0019758889,0.0000633684,0.0002444061,0.018405188,0.003954402,0.0014142464,0.8551307,0.1147644,0.00014953176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058995984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0938933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22224127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015898557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04063321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95911497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2554554291","doi":"","title":"The Judge as Politician: Review of In Defense of a Political Court","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.033910931738621766,"score_gpt":0.3537553172220859,"score_spread":0.31984438548346417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2554554291","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004438963,0.9897704,0.00005357103,0.0062515177,0.0013771406,0.0000028081797,0.00002301615,0.0000021424753,0.002474959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015872148,0.98817635,0.00012521319,0.005390682,0.0028544876,0.000009245837,0.00005481387,0.0000074774025,0.0017946117],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964945,0.0011953262,0.00039169117,0.00025900488,0.0015070993,0.00015245903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870624,0.0067814146,0.0011346643,0.00022487798,0.0044224826,0.00037414703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004461178,0.00086860155,0.0016623876,0.009113064,0.00096582307,0.005286549,0.0016897186,0.0041826153,0.0056373226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016337201,0.00058713456,0.0004766072,0.012449818,0.0031759343,0.0041038464,0.0012030206,0.0037411812,0.0018707864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051108815,0.000024818248,0.0003542668,0.010801201,0.00010501019,0.0001046997,0.00034207583,0.00023911917,0.0001753997,0.024058959,0.72866756,0.2350758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000090616495,0.000017069817,0.000938125,0.0073010894,0.000052387346,0.00012546258,0.00017457636,0.000031180498,0.000046539648,0.0043316926,0.9869617,0.000010991629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019018494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048857387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019018494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005871709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016433641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04260248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2554928324","doi":"10.21991/c9ht18","title":"A Project to Reduce Canadians' Constitutional Illiteracy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); House of Commons; Constitution; Opposition (politics); Political science; Democracy; Law; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Citizenship; Parliament; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.030062421665450312,"score_gpt":0.30633203005157505,"score_spread":0.27626960838612474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2554928324","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1921759,0.0016914567,0.0121057285,0.14426482,0.0018835188,0.0014344609,0.0028214455,0.0017653822,0.64185745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6024828,0.001359271,0.020522952,0.025550228,0.0002875529,0.0009325038,0.0019813504,0.0004899708,0.34639338],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99573874,0.000602708,0.00006252817,0.00037726742,0.0017682371,0.0014504466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989003,0.00074364466,0.00021667314,0.0006109021,0.0053427396,0.0040830774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036247754,0.0004981542,0.0002788385,0.0019907097,0.015458458,0.0042415187,0.0020302576,0.0014741023,0.021223968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012887359,0.00023049835,0.00058630086,0.0018920305,0.003717973,0.0015056762,0.004500753,0.0022719835,0.001874461],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020307995,0.00033052024,0.018764738,0.00026936585,0.00003437567,0.0003972815,0.031713504,0.00080570707,0.002977776,0.22700866,0.48960578,0.2278892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000115959454,0.0000869009,0.024095917,0.00016178147,0.000057522244,0.00010795146,0.020423498,0.00086094515,0.0012844548,0.0061354106,0.946607,0.000062729756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9822618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9869645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058434688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058434688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2683465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4239753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2559417282","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12218","title":"Judicialization of Environmental Policy and the Crisis of Democratic Accountability","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Polity; Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Politics; Sanctions; Law and economics; Political science; Supreme court; Public administration; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.08035788296295691,"score_gpt":0.4559302898582831,"score_spread":0.37557240689532617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2559417282","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34115243,0.022507586,0.019802295,0.23432381,0.00089374656,0.00013067575,0.00014215737,0.000110844696,0.38093647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937942,0.0012870607,0.0005582345,0.0027426279,0.00023329686,0.000023444227,0.0000102381855,0.0000076157194,0.0013433394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97653586,0.015484738,0.00075456337,0.0015225948,0.0031525965,0.0025496182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9471375,0.03190095,0.00950014,0.003337131,0.006778762,0.0013455773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023715798,0.00016956379,0.0005182926,0.0012098731,0.0036374845,0.0064572454,0.0009158485,0.0030853725,0.0025523931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036946323,0.00020487167,0.000365712,0.0012319362,0.016463997,0.0029107025,0.002949717,0.004563949,0.00015325258],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027261705,0.00004250649,0.0039913184,0.00012728856,0.000018623501,0.00014297005,0.00186505,0.0010330576,0.000478942,0.97211534,0.0041000415,0.016057562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009625356,0.00017720446,0.02915791,0.0011192907,0.00005521192,0.00023084348,0.0043640416,0.0043621343,0.0019885679,0.8131208,0.14525455,0.000073162046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00783312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008783812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023715798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007928049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009700645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1254226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2559641857","doi":"10.1515/lehr-2016-0013","title":"Fragile Trust: Muslim Communities in Canada and the R v. NS Decision","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Ethics of Human Rights","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Charter; Political science; Harm; Sincerity; Sociology","score_opus":0.04159052388061111,"score_gpt":0.31012315282390857,"score_spread":0.26853262894329744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2559641857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33744574,0.006467041,0.0014526742,0.33145222,0.0013745414,0.00025659814,0.0006450935,0.00008211907,0.32082397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.915197,0.0013868734,0.00055371836,0.047121488,0.00016813872,0.000037303653,0.00007304355,0.000027815255,0.0354346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99095845,0.00083386037,0.000207963,0.0005918312,0.0027867341,0.0046212394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855828,0.0035113273,0.0005343272,0.00035331256,0.004212273,0.0058059245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060663507,0.00036177746,0.00046345653,0.0014573053,0.039374992,0.00935955,0.0029140427,0.010016861,0.0065812524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01450531,0.00055055256,0.0006971237,0.0016857707,0.011746709,0.001744536,0.003904619,0.011179887,0.00028399003],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022730163,0.000114355935,0.028406708,0.00018722766,0.00009173662,0.0061766407,0.027366398,0.0015598998,0.0013626228,0.7540885,0.14608826,0.034330383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027469418,0.00023190411,0.07111543,0.0015523013,0.0003934917,0.0017982761,0.0840313,0.0053829765,0.0029547988,0.07462623,0.75677776,0.0008608653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9946169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14907368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14907368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26042724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9869539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560105731","doi":"","title":"James B. Kelly, Governing with the Charter: Legislative and Judicial Activism and Framer’s Intent, Vancouver, UBC Press, 2005","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Persée (Ministère de lEnseignement supérieur et de la Recherche)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legislature; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04768109411912226,"score_gpt":0.3238712102908605,"score_spread":0.2761901161717383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560105731","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025015972,0.63414603,0.0023364904,0.16963157,0.0033877979,0.000079973346,0.00073306274,0.00008697456,0.18709649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13084458,0.5492215,0.004237442,0.037988096,0.0026299108,0.00021242381,0.0006408805,0.00032056536,0.27390468],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99715436,0.0010298301,0.00020827516,0.00021919793,0.001002368,0.0003860832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994599,0.003109421,0.00042379933,0.000120430384,0.0014465691,0.00030083992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028967601,0.0011130706,0.00064786116,0.003611829,0.00890978,0.008135906,0.0025361546,0.0060857884,0.014784782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005275483,0.0010400148,0.00039695116,0.0065395837,0.007603444,0.008169954,0.0015927592,0.0063223457,0.005440454],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003415446,0.000031466756,0.0006477099,0.00035889976,0.000011343155,0.00017850437,0.011630023,0.00012861383,0.00011960057,0.0855867,0.8626412,0.03863183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014213632,0.0000071886175,0.005545102,0.0012397297,0.00001555427,0.00015521144,0.010738052,0.000061709885,0.00021212987,0.022417378,0.9595426,0.000051177736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5580921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.76752734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5580921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018443868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013150008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88902074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560454368","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3053","title":"Book Note: The End of the Charter Revolution: Looking Back from the New Normal by Peter J McCormick","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Expansive; Supreme court; Political science; Economic Justice; Narrative; Sociology; History; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.013121076446453496,"score_gpt":0.2392946275192309,"score_spread":0.2261735510727774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560454368","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015407155,0.043780316,0.0007897635,0.78443974,0.0103583615,0.000017629123,0.00019185469,0.000036713318,0.15884483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.079737455,0.04897225,0.001817524,0.3460055,0.015328692,0.00007437282,0.0002557855,0.00021789248,0.5075905],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986267,0.000309674,0.000026961772,0.00015701688,0.00066737423,0.00021240067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978587,0.0010100404,0.00008691184,0.00010804786,0.0006770277,0.00025920913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012469135,0.00036503733,0.00024577923,0.00080110243,0.0071599237,0.007573007,0.0008532099,0.0029681255,0.010758889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004966084,0.00026743894,0.00023094295,0.0011177155,0.00863863,0.007182184,0.0012983598,0.009072609,0.002146602],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034223922,0.0000036613092,0.00007587802,0.000013809653,7.135956e-7,0.000026152115,0.00085506303,0.000023165867,0.00002811919,0.15765926,0.8362687,0.0050420463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017098763,0.0000016495205,0.00019876193,0.00008067484,0.0000010305253,0.00002044746,0.000741696,0.000024888983,0.000035551424,0.014273969,0.98461425,0.0000054775246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3500062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.567284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3500062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014577686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01881997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6959379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2565145981","doi":"","title":"Judicial activism in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Docs.school Publications","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Judicial activism; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.0570380397972999,"score_gpt":0.3098555672352147,"score_spread":0.2528175274379148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2565145981","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2592099,0.017039267,0.00039791,0.15973896,0.0011653278,0.00019655601,0.0018304068,0.00007876631,0.56034285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84741485,0.004284724,0.00028413883,0.015711805,0.00023429956,0.000053611937,0.0003325906,0.000037816048,0.13164622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922388,0.0004412,0.00013435145,0.0005204594,0.0017887313,0.004876437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99420786,0.00096696586,0.00029145213,0.0001316335,0.0019507203,0.0024514205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023289465,0.00032762333,0.00063357997,0.002179601,0.026768276,0.010008741,0.0016961463,0.005396161,0.016741704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066854977,0.0004409315,0.00044173398,0.0034330087,0.005221594,0.0010629527,0.002761303,0.006718501,0.00082741777],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022385527,0.00028591088,0.037181452,0.000496679,0.0001102485,0.0016082373,0.024844203,0.0015203994,0.0012513533,0.47170854,0.3721819,0.08858723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000100315585,0.00006573575,0.118733265,0.0005305877,0.00009730164,0.0001523389,0.022275522,0.0011349367,0.00082985376,0.008785635,0.84717447,0.00012004016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99514115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99848515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15472516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15472516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2849334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.980399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2565454016","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2981","title":"Book Review: Nothing To Lose But Our Chains: On Constitutional Disobedience, by Louis Michael Seidman","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Law; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03364380270610402,"score_gpt":0.3113250222835879,"score_spread":0.2776812195774839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2565454016","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018846616,0.73531276,0.00040950888,0.15238863,0.045368142,0.00001532417,0.00016707259,0.000074598734,0.06607554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005916678,0.6056732,0.00059783313,0.07860079,0.051110912,0.000067605935,0.0003486581,0.00017606796,0.25750825],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984999,0.00026907094,0.000061818064,0.0001320614,0.0009572903,0.00007999562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99492395,0.0021840408,0.00033176082,0.00013752659,0.0021109951,0.00031173983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015273686,0.00063700875,0.0008424613,0.002203825,0.0013897152,0.0044907564,0.0012640987,0.0027748581,0.021050436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011120377,0.00042670753,0.00038875185,0.0032459435,0.0022726723,0.00441534,0.001056707,0.0047549745,0.011968195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019938236,0.0000016380176,0.000014132538,0.00007296349,0.000002072019,0.000006165176,0.000016029204,0.00001933757,0.000014067697,0.002618591,0.9861405,0.011092593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027960161,0.0000037536058,0.00009964379,0.0003359119,0.000003898858,0.000033207394,0.000038622038,0.000016574388,0.000018336608,0.002358393,0.99708456,0.0000043234977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013016981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032743156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021050436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041113878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007983537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07042068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2566042272","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1512","title":"The Constitutional Legacy of Chief Justice Brian Dickson","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitution; Democracy; Federalism; Political science; Economic Justice; Jurisdiction; Separation of powers; Constitutional law; Value (mathematics); Rule of law; Disadvantaged; Judicial review; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.02183456482663942,"score_gpt":0.2871132256434757,"score_spread":0.26527866081683626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2566042272","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0142097045,0.03147948,0.0013390082,0.6967953,0.005279733,0.000028381424,0.0000967205,0.000051595875,0.25072005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5163998,0.017159414,0.001841531,0.33910084,0.0054020924,0.00007878677,0.00008627934,0.00012015667,0.11981117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99070555,0.0021898476,0.00022553586,0.0015210554,0.003382956,0.0019749738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894853,0.005698038,0.00031564268,0.00038068803,0.0031037373,0.0010165884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009148033,0.000273417,0.00055777293,0.0014820632,0.020068573,0.010918918,0.0018497091,0.007999668,0.004225484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017116286,0.0005735442,0.00024799307,0.0016674655,0.021295544,0.0038754314,0.0031442763,0.012142147,0.0007156023],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000131586185,0.000011162719,0.00022001797,0.00003241297,0.0000051787156,0.00016509478,0.0032291298,0.00008723196,0.00021241473,0.78676635,0.20165664,0.0076013235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012298563,0.000010217612,0.00048780773,0.00014560299,0.000007784188,0.0000876423,0.0016636685,0.00009592267,0.0002503277,0.048536703,0.9486702,0.000031891406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31455424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32647857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6854458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028016062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027229717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6254467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2571300394","doi":"","title":"The New Parliamentary Sovereignty","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Parliamentary sovereignty; Parliament; Sovereignty; Political science; Charter; Law; Popular sovereignty; Legislature; Constitution; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.01204770562145398,"score_gpt":0.2633679489324555,"score_spread":0.25132024331100156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2571300394","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051445138,0.009409984,0.024763653,0.082635015,0.0012544041,0.00005284697,0.00028562185,0.00015262145,0.8300007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9252835,0.002861726,0.004747921,0.0061843474,0.0007105243,0.000047069843,0.00009228413,0.00007697351,0.059995722],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928402,0.0014593559,0.00019928975,0.0011572548,0.0030398015,0.0013040998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994317,0.0014278529,0.00036362617,0.0009429093,0.0021980451,0.0007505712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00609279,0.00020177609,0.00039253166,0.0012611925,0.006719118,0.008964168,0.0010870249,0.0021292435,0.0048793913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010913229,0.00027026265,0.00034680747,0.0012394965,0.02798137,0.006641956,0.0032824727,0.0042623654,0.00055356475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051648017,0.0000021890596,0.00020539403,0.000013047653,0.0000016509491,0.000023383594,0.0015377067,0.000056351586,0.00010203614,0.98873734,0.0037431507,0.005572483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014751306,0.000019122916,0.004561175,0.00014968758,0.000014493372,0.00013044197,0.001829679,0.00083470443,0.00034920202,0.4750056,0.517054,0.000037111557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29377276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25877005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29377276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020623036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0271164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58412564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2571779453","doi":"","title":"Review of Shaping Nations: Constitutionalism and Society in Australia and Canada by L Cardinal and D Headon (eds)","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Political science; Sociology; Law; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.07804265640210283,"score_gpt":0.32272290045709745,"score_spread":0.2446802440549946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2571779453","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017200028,0.98802185,0.000039379345,0.008537965,0.0015311517,0.000004666458,0.00010260092,0.0000033541369,0.0015870658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002941348,0.9915229,0.00011650104,0.0017966533,0.00095820776,0.000008490246,0.000098862394,0.0000067776045,0.0025502203],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983028,0.00042509247,0.00014742845,0.000120361794,0.0008165088,0.00018780453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902289,0.0029982657,0.00056267984,0.00020486672,0.005449266,0.00055604643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043406878,0.00082819245,0.0022570502,0.008416694,0.0020176491,0.0046105324,0.0018612038,0.0018731983,0.006996288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011384249,0.0006392024,0.0005499447,0.025074724,0.0034179173,0.002711815,0.0016685447,0.0022576905,0.0007244197],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054048953,0.000018388004,0.0008483254,0.009286352,0.000109592285,0.000074480224,0.00114099,0.00037861677,0.000077754674,0.01916683,0.7455351,0.22330956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011897416,0.0000105609715,0.004883426,0.008037135,0.00009090728,0.000074605334,0.00084990845,0.000052760668,0.000036304195,0.0026785927,0.9832525,0.000021314878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72155774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8738846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27844226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018436717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06876043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5601641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2572350151","doi":"10.3138/utlj.4216","title":"Why judges should dissent","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Dissent; Political science; Judicial opinion; Transparency (behavior); Law; Indeterminacy (philosophy); Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.04189442167510912,"score_gpt":0.29010924771984514,"score_spread":0.24821482604473602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2572350151","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.124169275,0.0070995307,0.04003694,0.4817887,0.011811555,0.00026520572,0.0001057002,0.0004981241,0.33422506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84984076,0.0009989414,0.008662709,0.110878706,0.0022591313,0.00019743375,0.000059969243,0.0002479758,0.026854435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9523303,0.018956134,0.0018170053,0.005958018,0.014133461,0.0068051172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95539945,0.02202543,0.0032777553,0.0031305982,0.011815081,0.004351639],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028714912,0.00048130576,0.00053893845,0.0013140504,0.010960177,0.0074377693,0.0018003149,0.009875551,0.0048662396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.109528735,0.0006734264,0.0005982048,0.0006079803,0.020902945,0.0049760845,0.0050161188,0.009782947,0.0030175995],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012817985,0.00008773435,0.011392401,0.00021478452,0.0000767521,0.0021442883,0.050367873,0.00061755534,0.0028330653,0.6357072,0.23392487,0.06250533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001651153,0.000086755346,0.007624449,0.00048270813,0.000043005337,0.0009338214,0.026583469,0.0010122899,0.0026283534,0.55504537,0.4052121,0.00018250002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007598218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011161504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028714912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004633508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006505995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15186077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2574510694","doi":"","title":"Expanding our Constitutional Horizons: A Comprehensive Study of Quasi-Constitutionality in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Political science; Law; Constitution","score_opus":0.022291700940997777,"score_gpt":0.26164703427324376,"score_spread":0.23935533333224598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2574510694","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38520914,0.057423625,0.0039652702,0.053455334,0.00026101703,0.0002649566,0.0025299808,0.00009903339,0.49679157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94521135,0.031325627,0.0028552625,0.0027033573,0.00005905939,0.000058065852,0.00051388255,0.00004659026,0.017226804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99619174,0.0004975792,0.00009417901,0.0003186129,0.0018028637,0.00109502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945372,0.00219577,0.00027846498,0.00021227737,0.0020378053,0.0007385233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025296153,0.0003186672,0.0006758777,0.0053986544,0.026102668,0.009899222,0.0017965793,0.0013117084,0.0035378342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053536007,0.0003914547,0.0004990681,0.017065534,0.014263901,0.004716719,0.002196283,0.0037849145,0.00017485768],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021754788,0.00005440541,0.013988219,0.00036309002,0.000039159848,0.0006034085,0.06394187,0.0019141238,0.0004321596,0.84471065,0.022659801,0.051271383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017016517,0.00003155435,0.09690772,0.0010923409,0.00010674811,0.00029815247,0.12002128,0.0040604556,0.00045773378,0.078156844,0.69866806,0.00018199449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9977701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26084268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.26084268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2923832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8573177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2576008894","doi":"10.3138/utlj.4217","title":"Ten theses on dissent","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Dissenting opinion; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.028879671997048793,"score_gpt":0.27744498722907146,"score_spread":0.24856531523202266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2576008894","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030070024,0.010962035,0.007056607,0.76920336,0.044893723,0.000108675806,0.00017092134,0.00009985091,0.1644978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20060384,0.014222365,0.009161825,0.58385843,0.058511656,0.0010426656,0.00028229383,0.00024227456,0.13207461],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9816108,0.008300009,0.0010956648,0.0013537555,0.005956007,0.0016837477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9449323,0.03637093,0.0022693828,0.0028954367,0.010181008,0.0033510146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017758686,0.00084399316,0.0009471384,0.0032754024,0.009870325,0.010158725,0.003968174,0.013118746,0.01016555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047465846,0.00047176424,0.0014049252,0.002521681,0.03028583,0.0104628885,0.008201156,0.018844217,0.0024448608],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024582147,0.00006215947,0.0003344433,0.00008277358,0.0000054849816,0.00006878249,0.0025644822,0.000048596583,0.000042765278,0.8183625,0.16892026,0.009483171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000206773,0.000034410852,0.0008349852,0.00035626322,0.000008525865,0.00009016525,0.0059253406,0.0002264628,0.00020589214,0.30329558,0.68896353,0.00003814321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007183316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012897468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017758686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007651075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071312236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.093918025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W25776318","doi":"10.82308/51751","title":"The transition to constitutional democracy : judging the Supreme Court on gay rights","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Democracy; Transition (genetics); Political science; Law; Gay rights; Constitutional court; Constitution; Politics","score_opus":0.026492209367508162,"score_gpt":0.27120980138428524,"score_spread":0.2447175920167771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W25776318","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49022096,0.0033076361,0.0048894156,0.13318694,0.0009178765,0.00021111874,0.00015975474,0.0000471573,0.3670591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905207,0.00044186393,0.0007333663,0.0036688675,0.00012401324,0.000017824992,0.000021694594,0.000008975696,0.0044626594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837857,0.0059787375,0.00041548282,0.0007752542,0.004837767,0.004207005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97630954,0.015275071,0.0010496695,0.0007119193,0.005041233,0.0016125122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020498931,0.00018498288,0.00046931618,0.0017680067,0.015970485,0.015055309,0.0019501259,0.006537292,0.0025491344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0627769,0.00028044696,0.00038703845,0.0016828994,0.032668266,0.0044669462,0.0039800312,0.009826418,0.00024114976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007713561,0.000033709686,0.0071118185,0.000047589947,0.00001854025,0.0005166505,0.024141885,0.00084878516,0.00028637418,0.9361742,0.015116348,0.01562702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018600601,0.00014842214,0.044285648,0.00060684315,0.00010993095,0.00019110981,0.09949269,0.007006675,0.0030981572,0.6627679,0.18186985,0.00023668804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7026455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8208366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29735452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040742394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050638746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5982114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2578785134","doi":"","title":"General principles of the Canadian constitutional law","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publications Doc Du Juriste","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitutional law; Political science","score_opus":0.033193645976691805,"score_gpt":0.27416163691064566,"score_spread":0.24096799093395385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2578785134","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014481375,0.013897486,0.0046280907,0.02021275,0.0009747266,0.00020974463,0.001722745,0.0001473617,0.95675904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16235352,0.029147105,0.023911428,0.009499035,0.0018657958,0.00059319474,0.0019504699,0.00030298447,0.77037644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949332,0.00063039496,0.00017345503,0.00044132816,0.0030422688,0.0007794419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970925,0.0005767036,0.00007869556,0.00024430384,0.0017477983,0.0002600246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035682076,0.0010945966,0.0008875939,0.007339973,0.011145539,0.013813807,0.0024414049,0.0039566546,0.025619617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008132771,0.0010122181,0.00063490344,0.008856299,0.015219978,0.0028800073,0.0012657118,0.005944379,0.003238028],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017525256,0.00000426511,0.00005453138,0.000024542749,0.0000017671824,0.0000105246645,0.00038218457,0.0001385071,0.00002303901,0.9534728,0.04121774,0.0046681976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011684434,0.0000031492586,0.0011601982,0.00022280173,0.000008307539,0.000032310094,0.00039251096,0.0002935383,0.000058772945,0.30641434,0.69137704,0.000025251811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95616764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9617675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09143068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09143068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13490643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6633791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2579109160","doi":"10.3138/utlj.4262","title":"The role of dissents in appellate judging","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Dissenting opinion; Political science; Variety (cybernetics); Law; Concurrence; First amendment; Supreme court; Computer science","score_opus":0.010881212267710706,"score_gpt":0.24792491752561457,"score_spread":0.23704370525790386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2579109160","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20272584,0.008644003,0.038377292,0.14484625,0.002942451,0.00018190702,0.00006118802,0.000105084306,0.602116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98157966,0.00053328753,0.0039055801,0.006528794,0.0006855383,0.00006824727,0.0000074313407,0.000027554433,0.006663867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.86459136,0.087654665,0.005671315,0.008481427,0.02580244,0.0077987984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.74566996,0.21232994,0.0137393195,0.007292646,0.014647096,0.006321083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.095376655,0.00045448547,0.0007876592,0.0029924575,0.017092766,0.013382597,0.002433847,0.008841366,0.0053935647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24571733,0.00062308245,0.00069501024,0.001818252,0.044629533,0.012227197,0.0126624685,0.010554033,0.0006749504],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000090520065,0.000045100845,0.0045781382,0.000109169094,0.000030889674,0.0008295382,0.03460458,0.00037839948,0.00029662758,0.9267307,0.005227002,0.027079305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010525969,0.0000949273,0.00814706,0.00046107778,0.000037594084,0.000572894,0.024495913,0.0014488049,0.0010903198,0.88732463,0.07608994,0.00013166311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006229455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010927525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.095376655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064641847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007844343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.504406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2579387497","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2820190","title":"Le rrle constitutionnel de la Cour suprrme du Canada: autoportrait (A Self-Portrait of the Supreme Court of Canada)","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Portrait; Art; Art history","score_opus":0.006653891738716762,"score_gpt":0.20234837426468696,"score_spread":0.19569448252597021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2579387497","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.115229554,0.017873963,0.004020007,0.0650575,0.00068437104,0.00007059801,0.0009371932,0.000106748244,0.79602003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8127541,0.0037350703,0.0014051723,0.004184285,0.00013761113,0.000040067327,0.00010639484,0.00007791084,0.17755947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791664,0.00022303814,0.000028792418,0.00023971531,0.0007182066,0.0008736777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989084,0.0002416504,0.000051469135,0.000040057334,0.0005399048,0.00021850498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010447665,0.0003948757,0.00041352576,0.0014357037,0.023663562,0.014011535,0.0013899812,0.0043583866,0.01106551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033277785,0.000408922,0.00038830886,0.002901248,0.01098242,0.0020806806,0.002034845,0.0054522036,0.00053052773],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015534119,0.000006616964,0.000802311,0.000022272,0.00000751294,0.00015349328,0.005717829,0.00037654678,0.00016106911,0.96477246,0.020940317,0.007023947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036365207,0.000014410678,0.012384054,0.00026138013,0.00003924355,0.00018429612,0.014883226,0.0015656538,0.0005575253,0.09760809,0.8723436,0.00012218006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9947956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99693155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11264301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11264301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15165217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8172861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2580752897","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1364","title":"Book Notes: Constitutional Politics in Canada and the United States, by Stephen L. Newman (ed)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.013028585514775365,"score_gpt":0.2397355372746231,"score_spread":0.22670695175984773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2580752897","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023441485,0.397851,0.0015038174,0.22131738,0.010532951,0.000044913293,0.0027648807,0.00022961902,0.36341128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.043901715,0.35622954,0.003576087,0.049260683,0.010112901,0.00011918538,0.0024216082,0.00029790055,0.5340804],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994462,0.00007336691,0.000017576247,0.00004605752,0.00033409553,0.00008266748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981489,0.0007115198,0.0000725206,0.000053115928,0.00078558223,0.00022846916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007295826,0.00092021236,0.0005978337,0.0035091,0.0061938823,0.006087167,0.0017600298,0.0025986244,0.029537402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026812663,0.00050011463,0.0003795895,0.008278031,0.00514357,0.0044057793,0.0009672356,0.0026443023,0.007677687],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043581713,0.0000072795174,0.00021035023,0.000044142253,0.0000018069951,0.000020202899,0.00034957964,0.000104004575,0.000024267718,0.017952835,0.96890634,0.01237489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005814597,0.0000037760026,0.0018637559,0.00034962242,0.0000066838666,0.000044997953,0.0015843187,0.000090262416,0.00006909725,0.015185233,0.9807823,0.000014056204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.77331626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94139415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22668374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015108857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023949832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4560374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2581244033","doi":"10.21036/ltpub10012","title":"Do Constitutional Courts Use Balancing to Promote Judicial Activism?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Latest Thinking","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial activism; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Judicial review; Sociology","score_opus":0.04764335935563118,"score_gpt":0.32276565853644124,"score_spread":0.27512229918081005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2581244033","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4689883,0.0023700548,0.025275957,0.02374433,0.00017680842,0.00011827242,0.00006458385,0.00009270356,0.479169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947917,0.00023674846,0.0011551641,0.0009800115,0.000051013383,0.000021437032,0.000007167548,0.000008976566,0.0027477818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99007064,0.005197401,0.00027053768,0.0010488529,0.002030314,0.0013823374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98432934,0.008191666,0.004659403,0.0012102867,0.0009978177,0.0006115305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077646384,0.00022936516,0.0002656185,0.0016637279,0.00233766,0.0052894065,0.00091248204,0.002682997,0.0050822594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028170919,0.00031964303,0.00032751902,0.0015682448,0.009164097,0.0065981555,0.0019715794,0.0019741764,0.0005822237],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067018234,0.00013262007,0.016029464,0.0001277715,0.000055646335,0.00030931606,0.010855571,0.0007336027,0.004179881,0.8952565,0.0023637102,0.06988882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017542309,0.00039089422,0.06516701,0.00040238738,0.00012600597,0.00054360204,0.02424076,0.0039901184,0.0067659565,0.77043986,0.12764409,0.000113834736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023857483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047250246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077646384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016494681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021837521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041063845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2581548206","doi":"10.36939/cjur/vol25no2/art42","title":"Bylaw Battles: Explaining Municipal-Provincial and Municipal-Federal Win-Rates","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of urban research","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Ultra vires; Political science; Context (archaeology); Public administration; Corporate governance; Zoning; Law; Geography; Business","score_opus":0.1221807127966619,"score_gpt":0.37449392881454885,"score_spread":0.2523132160178869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2581548206","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93026334,0.00084473856,0.0027228673,0.0056225215,0.00005814375,0.00017574964,0.001411988,0.000044134536,0.058856525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984535,0.00010920206,0.00018306296,0.00007984298,0.000015206738,0.00001329065,0.00020284664,0.000009895817,0.0009332049],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868961,0.0019938156,0.0008261421,0.0013548691,0.0045281113,0.0044009113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9268231,0.036933437,0.017115725,0.0035830277,0.00893949,0.006605216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013802107,0.00030328377,0.0006799864,0.007089544,0.006818095,0.00736576,0.0030445606,0.001649264,0.014098739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10432729,0.00035181385,0.0007384116,0.008078779,0.00662889,0.0028716896,0.0035166778,0.0030389475,0.000687042],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000101190264,0.00010105968,0.8596987,0.000071663686,0.00007350902,0.00036291959,0.01691321,0.0015062984,0.00011908625,0.09834414,0.006471275,0.016236914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004702777,0.00005054021,0.8898265,0.00022090913,0.0001221542,0.0003570977,0.033208407,0.010920294,0.0003671491,0.04382328,0.020969583,0.00008705591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8476262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8629678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8476262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021103337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019383486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30654228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2581998729","doi":"","title":"The Supreme Court in Canada's constitutional order","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitution; Constitutionalism; Law; Political science; Constitutional court; Majority opinion; Constitutional law; Original jurisdiction; Sociology; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.027541976877775282,"score_gpt":0.249645461380737,"score_spread":0.22210348450296172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2581998729","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05927611,0.014671776,0.0018261505,0.08433701,0.00054887275,0.00003432595,0.00037326815,0.000053502186,0.8388789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9341173,0.0035197681,0.00061364594,0.004725409,0.00015432332,0.000019973446,0.00008608888,0.00003398693,0.05672952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99410534,0.0011191409,0.000077485834,0.0005299336,0.0018640192,0.0023040406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99746907,0.0008545745,0.00011397125,0.00012480686,0.0010407661,0.0003968821],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030742078,0.00031084634,0.00046798823,0.0019207305,0.028090714,0.0155843925,0.0017004197,0.0038048178,0.005477921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006915388,0.00032952917,0.00027097706,0.0037306533,0.03305107,0.0031524114,0.002201906,0.005197057,0.00031381205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003291017,0.0000019035576,0.00020966753,0.000009003093,0.0000018452077,0.00004914554,0.0045543294,0.00013458669,0.0000352368,0.98539865,0.0070655677,0.0025368214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000317297,0.000015959522,0.009029264,0.0003947931,0.000038385402,0.00008164423,0.01805084,0.0011482054,0.00026261146,0.34111065,0.62974495,0.00009093145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98936915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99287426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15954743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15954743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16521603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97480583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2583353677","doi":"10.1017/9781316672228.005","title":"The “Uncomfortable Embrace”: The Supreme Court and the Media in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Prime minister; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.018127956441835676,"score_gpt":0.1917669530164946,"score_spread":0.17363899657465892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2583353677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032514926,0.043830764,0.00067209435,0.15245812,0.0018817689,0.000033200165,0.0005028591,0.0000879484,0.7680184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5313457,0.019756114,0.00057856424,0.023532225,0.0005629947,0.00003918872,0.00018402319,0.00018679035,0.42381445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99720395,0.000283348,0.000029564986,0.00019068492,0.0012635614,0.0010289737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807954,0.0005192699,0.000068947804,0.000058707417,0.00072186056,0.0005517142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010990398,0.0006162352,0.00040511644,0.0020749813,0.034698058,0.020897461,0.001812444,0.0044651637,0.015806118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036647965,0.00049079704,0.00030635783,0.0044171955,0.017292403,0.0049653584,0.0029996433,0.0065701418,0.0011446931],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034429373,0.000026941168,0.0016605954,0.00010548165,0.000013576203,0.0004506342,0.042393364,0.00026565001,0.00031039646,0.62111753,0.29592362,0.037697762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011230097,0.000007698263,0.0041446867,0.00035308822,0.000023100927,0.00009674086,0.040533517,0.0002729723,0.00027371576,0.025921034,0.9283043,0.00005783761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9956955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99812084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1527793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1527793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19090681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98265594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2584855646","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjx017","title":"The Crown and Canadian Federalism, by D. Michael Jackson","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Constitution; Sovereignty; Politics; Law; Dual federalism; Political science; New Federalism; Sociology","score_opus":0.022385696715418568,"score_gpt":0.28680059655578516,"score_spread":0.2644148998403666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2584855646","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001315025,0.27697214,0.0009915535,0.28437132,0.022205854,0.000052558833,0.0005004924,0.000117396965,0.41347373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03324497,0.17017658,0.0023002282,0.0643007,0.0059599206,0.0000634041,0.000390591,0.00020865876,0.72335505],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989698,0.00008809253,0.00002430628,0.00016086882,0.0005604864,0.00019641532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993662,0.000107208965,0.000025232075,0.000018508463,0.00034999757,0.00013278468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000904087,0.00069078006,0.00037768652,0.0015358705,0.009916572,0.0054959585,0.00095648115,0.0022744245,0.010991586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002443459,0.00045547914,0.00033172677,0.0026519382,0.005034506,0.004000913,0.0015521854,0.003869935,0.0034546645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005806555,0.000004335768,0.000103907805,0.000040679828,0.0000017833812,0.000027091397,0.0007322201,0.000049108512,0.000049439754,0.063329406,0.9211511,0.014505193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.567693e-7,7.5711523e-7,0.00019404343,0.00004828041,7.2531964e-7,0.000016105318,0.00021248915,0.000012362301,0.000009131295,0.0021344563,0.9973672,0.000003549633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8536806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9313899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14631939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045130875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049589854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32744896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2585306030","doi":"10.1111/rego.12145","title":"Ideological influences on governance and regulation: The comparative case of supreme courts","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Planning and Budgeting Committee of the Council for Higher Education of Israel; Israeli Centers for Research Excellence; Israel Science Foundation","keywords":"Ideology; Supreme court; Deference; Corporate governance; Politics; Preference; Law; Political science; Ideal (ethics); Legitimacy; Separation of powers; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.06546170716106989,"score_gpt":0.3415143140665916,"score_spread":0.2760526069055217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2585306030","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8975901,0.00039467996,0.0015141848,0.0026504751,0.000018513138,0.000014682799,0.000023878196,0.000003317191,0.09779017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993507,0.000052361145,0.00009627493,0.000067616726,0.000008870814,0.000002961534,0.000003506122,8.5608275e-7,0.00041680565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99540293,0.0028303242,0.00006657589,0.00023748113,0.0006393562,0.0008233505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98700166,0.009345527,0.0011368669,0.00069097994,0.0011612558,0.00066369923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007038856,0.00009624071,0.00032697557,0.0015722661,0.0038614976,0.0040506716,0.0005835329,0.0012308359,0.0036098065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01345266,0.00012105955,0.00027218525,0.0012759063,0.007572524,0.001869898,0.0020544885,0.0021057844,0.00011394361],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010153786,0.00013414149,0.024148168,0.000031794738,0.000032174004,0.001031428,0.0102846855,0.0024852403,0.00046541606,0.95293635,0.001008244,0.007340792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002997599,0.00025585206,0.1975752,0.00022882281,0.0001649179,0.00068449107,0.05356307,0.025595373,0.002014856,0.6746777,0.044809178,0.00013078605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01862805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024018446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01862805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041715773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014487974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037225485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586630346","doi":"","title":"Diversity, Transparency & Inclusion in Canada’s Judiciary","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Diversity (politics); Inclusion (mineral); Political science; Law; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.01289189969847177,"score_gpt":0.23832819087905868,"score_spread":0.22543629118058692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586630346","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4934252,0.0038905444,0.001362825,0.18437983,0.0005436462,0.0001243811,0.0006389796,0.000059461014,0.31557518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9762621,0.00025794643,0.00026693297,0.005421431,0.00007978846,0.000026269317,0.00004385234,0.000021156236,0.017620584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9649316,0.004515716,0.00067880173,0.0020410714,0.010937136,0.01689569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94151175,0.021083869,0.0027690711,0.0018038524,0.015926072,0.016905313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017005274,0.00034391897,0.0012306073,0.004400232,0.06804311,0.028008336,0.0036274581,0.009362778,0.0118199745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055785704,0.000674409,0.00074051233,0.0073415684,0.023790402,0.0054666298,0.009856639,0.013617492,0.00043356084],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001717415,0.00016614719,0.039526172,0.000111290516,0.000099611105,0.00050705613,0.06499575,0.0013871961,0.00031814814,0.7977977,0.06065618,0.034262948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021425402,0.0001386917,0.1950596,0.0012411939,0.0002242073,0.00022171898,0.11923312,0.002688456,0.0011959331,0.21294782,0.4662706,0.0005643926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9885123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99516785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79302174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20697825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3868681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91979283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586848772","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1293","title":"Book Notes: The Last Word. Media Coverage of the Supreme Court of Canada, by Florian Sauvageau, David Schneiderman and David Taras","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.00955608686036542,"score_gpt":0.22057672398506406,"score_spread":0.21102063712469865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586848772","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019843695,0.09992469,0.00041957851,0.21472071,0.020068493,0.00006301795,0.008617065,0.0002599586,0.6539421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018625313,0.025018686,0.0002970821,0.03222153,0.0052422956,0.000052202042,0.0013794345,0.00021874833,0.9169447],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916494,0.000035805544,0.00001578838,0.000057093912,0.00055132754,0.00017492608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981154,0.00032228004,0.000057501493,0.000057427293,0.0012598049,0.00018757509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004089758,0.00073862105,0.0006341191,0.004291422,0.010910702,0.007198117,0.0016396265,0.0035694235,0.08510276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026152744,0.0005172508,0.00038571152,0.008477981,0.0021436359,0.0027292336,0.0009772517,0.003021541,0.014860131],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036782496,0.0000027111523,0.00008379269,0.00002924308,0.0000012921196,0.000010196207,0.0001679256,0.000015906495,0.000014087443,0.0068673254,0.98709065,0.0057131955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025665026,0.0000011461987,0.0010581542,0.00011743002,0.000003611343,0.000009202752,0.00041645323,0.000019516146,0.000030718933,0.0009972256,0.9973375,0.0000064271303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9621411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98866946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08510276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02905615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029791227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28469712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588656217","doi":"","title":"A Defence of Constitutionalized Interpretation","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.037838196236773335,"score_gpt":0.3577843659545118,"score_spread":0.3199461697177385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588656217","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0077290935,0.0041730953,0.048168138,0.1099556,0.002113719,0.000068550944,0.00022602826,0.00008931567,0.82747644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8751481,0.0022318847,0.017287325,0.030919855,0.0041210563,0.000576761,0.00021268235,0.00022884345,0.069273494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97610146,0.0131983785,0.0007118174,0.0030778605,0.0049370453,0.0019734786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894421,0.0057260715,0.0006328757,0.0023380367,0.0014693263,0.0003915581],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018360311,0.0006597272,0.00096540217,0.0021345254,0.007454904,0.012584889,0.0035432882,0.0105129825,0.0086597195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026624367,0.00058338995,0.0013848065,0.0016788698,0.06635953,0.0108322855,0.007356345,0.01731463,0.001658073],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013846231,9.026772e-7,0.000007888537,0.0000035719693,8.108843e-7,0.0000054905045,0.00017109184,0.000024274801,0.000005397691,0.99876416,0.0007789041,0.00023609369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000918972,0.0000032502662,0.000031221593,0.00003549705,0.00000272308,0.00001542818,0.00019750537,0.0001592724,0.000039730894,0.97556937,0.023933034,0.0000038035246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005704425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047599436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018360311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008995498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010821613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09709978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589723758","doi":"","title":"Nom De Plume: Who Writes the Supreme Court's \"By the Court\" Judgments?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Humanities; Political science; Redaction; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.021664389761494502,"score_gpt":0.27380010781380726,"score_spread":0.2521357180523128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2589723758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021162149,0.020542467,0.006703958,0.23032661,0.014612219,0.00012344419,0.0011541283,0.0003724973,0.70500255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42958584,0.01390184,0.0037524195,0.054487888,0.00846052,0.00018564356,0.0012393392,0.00090341334,0.48748308],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976648,0.001147735,0.00009452728,0.0003382725,0.00060832204,0.00014636497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997408,0.0011056149,0.0002006834,0.00010601465,0.000932013,0.0002476696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024029927,0.00047706123,0.00034652688,0.0016886556,0.005456223,0.0106806345,0.0007618331,0.0018645561,0.019222878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010746695,0.00028668594,0.00017331891,0.0013905871,0.0042259353,0.0075343545,0.0022345101,0.003535542,0.008389993],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006090845,0.000016281887,0.0028500918,0.00027365435,0.0000075108214,0.00046030094,0.04445118,0.00004290098,0.0010422915,0.3356463,0.52733403,0.0878146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039401693,0.000009393188,0.0012143905,0.00021884673,0.000004034092,0.00018209525,0.014416357,0.00008811339,0.00038823157,0.009437524,0.97401965,0.000017357755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01901954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027569458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019222878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004920974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003849358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064306974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591481740","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/62.3.809","title":"Jacco Bomhoff, Balancing Constitutional Rights: The Origins and Meaning of Postwar Legal Discourse","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Original meaning; Constitutional law; Law; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.022726149013596306,"score_gpt":0.3270274343780725,"score_spread":0.3043012853644762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2591481740","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005456829,0.21399719,0.0025941906,0.54083675,0.0064230417,0.000044579152,0.0003438572,0.0000610672,0.23024249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36258373,0.32528663,0.005043168,0.11652675,0.024249658,0.00029594882,0.0005330621,0.00046014067,0.16502085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981036,0.00097056787,0.00005185297,0.00016407928,0.00056618935,0.0001436326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995027,0.0034038466,0.00029613293,0.00016146999,0.00080026605,0.00031119405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023431357,0.0005376114,0.00038191638,0.003694966,0.008166902,0.007868732,0.001444771,0.006635927,0.012690944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009265474,0.00036607325,0.00020525845,0.0063729184,0.013838409,0.015438433,0.002974471,0.00618812,0.0022505824],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020016425,0.000020048923,0.00023379523,0.00014022719,0.0000058417463,0.000086562424,0.006576699,0.00006898904,0.000083078376,0.6232273,0.3519374,0.017600054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001785511,0.000005659456,0.0012623637,0.0006606282,0.000007818664,0.0001540807,0.004566101,0.00012837964,0.00022783206,0.30627623,0.68666506,0.000027895474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035553187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043377887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035553187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005612777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056363633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07069248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591628856","doi":"","title":"Entrenching Rights in the United States and Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bar News: The Journal of the NSW Bar Association","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Government (linguistics); Bill of rights; Law; Public administration; Law and economics; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.00784473361665153,"score_gpt":0.23456688099131012,"score_spread":0.2267221473746586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2591628856","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12072436,0.010129497,0.000606315,0.08719651,0.00078368577,0.00007301029,0.0004309857,0.000041176645,0.78001446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85151905,0.006427841,0.0008846807,0.018901343,0.00012227772,0.000041293555,0.00016092966,0.0000433012,0.12189915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99189985,0.0005809073,0.00016872362,0.0005944376,0.0028749907,0.0038811155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99335045,0.00093919755,0.0002780359,0.00022525871,0.0030721242,0.0021350337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029851228,0.00028551792,0.00053492887,0.0025111279,0.027721088,0.012196528,0.0013809024,0.004079862,0.0075678886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008005096,0.00040708677,0.0005102331,0.0041626035,0.013197492,0.0028675701,0.004530552,0.006972883,0.0003300124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003125389,0.000027807097,0.0032703362,0.00003982134,0.0000143489915,0.00033666295,0.013145061,0.0003941988,0.00017463353,0.93010443,0.035658453,0.016803019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006195004,0.00003985779,0.041053466,0.00055613334,0.0000706376,0.0002053098,0.034672804,0.0012131712,0.00045084322,0.060856964,0.8605927,0.00022608064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99717087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1674673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1674673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25069356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9656199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592428550","doi":"","title":"Canadian Constitutional Culture: A Genealogical Account","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; State (computer science); Constitutional law; Law; Constitutional theory; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.022234060384658933,"score_gpt":0.29672746245141973,"score_spread":0.2744934020667608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592428550","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08514721,0.005916153,0.004504895,0.031149354,0.00025389102,0.00005056133,0.000817599,0.00010876179,0.8720517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9698099,0.0035667713,0.0018177197,0.0012552617,0.00006386217,0.000024238721,0.00022194635,0.00007197246,0.02316833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99725133,0.00030401436,0.00004627249,0.00031545482,0.0011060387,0.0009769144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975841,0.00050581014,0.00014040363,0.00018184348,0.0011608691,0.0004268677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015110011,0.0003952787,0.00042905405,0.004534306,0.023050178,0.010401613,0.0023233062,0.0013919611,0.0077535487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055365716,0.00030040406,0.00032286285,0.00830837,0.022246553,0.0032878893,0.0025853799,0.0027681224,0.0003339728],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070161436,0.000004630741,0.0016295688,0.000026799666,0.000006506204,0.00013295212,0.021144453,0.00049515296,0.000081293474,0.96111435,0.007167303,0.008190175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023545734,0.000015466903,0.019057365,0.00034314152,0.00006515828,0.00036009692,0.062175915,0.002768865,0.0002766185,0.26345614,0.6513599,0.00009781212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98669004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9897216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15949114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15949114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10995572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97487116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592805955","doi":"","title":"Oxford LibGuides: Constitutions and constitutional law: Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitutional law; Political science","score_opus":0.040490158586077116,"score_gpt":0.2727420876774026,"score_spread":0.23225192909132547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592805955","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011934613,0.19510579,0.0011078287,0.045744814,0.0026284182,0.00013573452,0.011234447,0.0002985392,0.7318099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06622765,0.058973905,0.0014808528,0.0030772926,0.00047116485,0.00012364631,0.0014325698,0.00020884618,0.868004],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908936,0.000117104275,0.00005220233,0.000108515895,0.00042379712,0.0002091551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844426,0.00039146197,0.000067183406,0.00006116844,0.00078543747,0.0002505917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009130538,0.0009513896,0.0007065433,0.003653193,0.012982638,0.011374432,0.0015745958,0.0056083156,0.084435105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033539077,0.001024526,0.00036572854,0.014732427,0.0041952957,0.004171936,0.0018097416,0.004604112,0.0039528627],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000340736,0.000035346933,0.0014528782,0.00035959028,0.000013240318,0.00021239756,0.0032590837,0.0005008865,0.00009630493,0.28463098,0.6643416,0.04506361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014035516,0.000005097181,0.003982781,0.0005304837,0.000015206697,0.00004240498,0.0027222703,0.00013472623,0.00013013273,0.010656982,0.9817345,0.00003126702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98664457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99654526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.086565465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.086565465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15142141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62807935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594288950","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3147","title":"Dialogue: Clarified and Reconsidered","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogic; Meaning (existential); Metaphor; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Variation (astronomy); Sociology; Political science; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06817322310856946,"score_gpt":0.3207118989890782,"score_spread":0.2525386758805087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594288950","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22985941,0.009000783,0.0973663,0.14008555,0.0018218209,0.0003686265,0.00024062156,0.00047198433,0.52078485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98059905,0.0006564017,0.0060376544,0.0029541978,0.0001310639,0.00008290722,0.00004427009,0.00008080845,0.009413708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95659083,0.031829126,0.0011455494,0.002672024,0.0049697603,0.002792687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9749005,0.014285256,0.0014381316,0.0031730863,0.0047453614,0.0014576213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02660026,0.0005612511,0.00076964934,0.0023529462,0.019748114,0.02256014,0.002883445,0.007617828,0.0037768644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042309355,0.00047523284,0.0006770742,0.0023303763,0.056116838,0.019800369,0.0145144,0.011650446,0.0005731158],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024951769,0.000009254625,0.00023140294,0.000056390676,0.000005162945,0.00023198914,0.3213556,0.00014441313,0.0005927797,0.6658402,0.0025024214,0.0090053845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003491643,0.000027882177,0.0007622116,0.00044626504,0.00002574031,0.00030538093,0.3223554,0.0016183364,0.0011843259,0.3267738,0.34637746,0.000088375775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.084596686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06426562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.084596686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030617524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030815803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22214669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597632956","doi":"","title":"At the Margins of Official Classifications: Status-less Indigenous Groups in Canadian Courts","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Droit et société","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Invisibility; Denial; Identity (music); Political science; Visibility; Order (exchange); Law; Geography; Psychology; Business","score_opus":0.03867653008841583,"score_gpt":0.3274721020581544,"score_spread":0.2887955719697386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2597632956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98950225,0.00012938886,0.00006038215,0.0011098306,0.000010516346,0.000015908765,0.000020720014,0.0000017699264,0.009149321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983821,0.000058080685,0.000033818415,0.00015699098,0.0000037317461,0.000004106988,0.000012096197,0.0000019870517,0.001347202],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908613,0.00091865467,0.00021157993,0.0006829613,0.0026129833,0.0047125723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897147,0.0016405208,0.002454404,0.00041435607,0.0030244854,0.002751506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037731417,0.0002496599,0.00064458715,0.0044441875,0.034358215,0.0075444267,0.0026513846,0.0017974158,0.004618492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0146583775,0.0003564532,0.00035005444,0.004586432,0.016684344,0.0023009332,0.006399199,0.0036314132,0.00015914603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016997365,0.00030046183,0.20771885,0.00006187663,0.00003193174,0.0012595234,0.7099315,0.00016950646,0.0017358521,0.050412357,0.002251551,0.025956612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020910822,0.00006474119,0.36552113,0.00015697586,0.000039386443,0.0002607199,0.611001,0.00061566004,0.00044406837,0.0043161144,0.017469177,0.00008998028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9785364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9921111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06528045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06528045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06686434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47364503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2598777775","doi":"","title":"Review of G.C.N. Webber, the Negotiable Constitution: On the Limitation of Rights (Cambridge University Press, 2009)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.015671350958945975,"score_gpt":0.2488015643107564,"score_spread":0.23313021335181042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2598777775","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005300787,0.9569933,0.00014912871,0.030037064,0.0063080913,0.0000062954496,0.000092160655,0.0000065966933,0.006354396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012980015,0.96269387,0.00021701217,0.023036156,0.006422428,0.000019768579,0.00017122668,0.000018941924,0.006122619],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840635,0.0003849241,0.00013424814,0.00021365733,0.00075645593,0.000104353436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941632,0.002971373,0.0003678451,0.00014133975,0.0021112277,0.000244968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025836357,0.0008886779,0.0016527884,0.006076615,0.0010338756,0.0027427543,0.0018683217,0.0040612617,0.010095012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008990819,0.0005859221,0.0005017132,0.008351114,0.0023867132,0.004387624,0.0015536672,0.0047927485,0.006980196],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000127334715,0.000007777842,0.00006761693,0.0019381355,0.000019146786,0.000039925013,0.00012893729,0.000070352806,0.00004153029,0.008476123,0.9128223,0.07637538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030206265,0.0000033073816,0.00028108308,0.0022246235,0.000008888246,0.000065918975,0.000053786312,0.000008512698,0.000017281545,0.0014866557,0.9958417,0.0000051991046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014590501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025803575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014590501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050396943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007849756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03656572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2601669387","doi":"","title":"A Skeptical Optimist’s Perspective on Canada Getting to Proportional Representation as an Electoral Reform","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Perspective (graphical); Proportional representation; Representation (politics); Political science; Economics; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Computer science; Democracy; Politics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03209003241784091,"score_gpt":0.3544658520037639,"score_spread":0.322375819585923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2601669387","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008773706,0.0010082868,0.00040974433,0.9362749,0.0019504112,0.000022798129,0.00017622818,0.000022404556,0.051361512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24822256,0.0017081193,0.0013708656,0.6460587,0.0016030979,0.000058138867,0.00009488307,0.00011125629,0.10077229],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852653,0.0020379638,0.00036167566,0.0014691892,0.0049028727,0.005963089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9810687,0.005117518,0.00055948476,0.0005045946,0.0078096776,0.004940095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008220175,0.0005128295,0.0009683002,0.0023167997,0.04208498,0.019902542,0.00407117,0.0244584,0.01834231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03738118,0.0005476351,0.0011147239,0.0035216426,0.019221332,0.0062917206,0.004251996,0.03608429,0.0011959568],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056763398,0.000028319067,0.001710875,0.000051296716,0.000029586172,0.00016422967,0.0046666195,0.0002771261,0.00014162506,0.65402985,0.33120194,0.007641768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009133498,0.00003822307,0.005292356,0.00030779702,0.000071001836,0.0001596973,0.018830163,0.0009300065,0.0007865706,0.10506101,0.8681857,0.00024617164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9749287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9844051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.084373616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.084373616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19047654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6121763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2601949199","doi":"","title":"Popular constitutional amendment: Referendums and constitutional change in Canada and the United Kingdom","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queen's law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional amendment; Political science; Kingdom; Amendment; Constitutional law; Law; Constitution","score_opus":0.09018708587682121,"score_gpt":0.30018320084071143,"score_spread":0.2099961149638902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2601949199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69302285,0.016698765,0.0005892457,0.04605891,0.00038759699,0.00008928901,0.00079742994,0.00004345424,0.24231245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795009,0.0015662896,0.0001681112,0.001746133,0.00003404346,0.000014489099,0.0000705911,0.000018552988,0.01688095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9827754,0.0031763439,0.00062415964,0.0011221478,0.0048399502,0.007461971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.968952,0.01363691,0.0019278923,0.00095697393,0.011522994,0.0030032503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008194229,0.00024360744,0.0010197845,0.004701747,0.03154671,0.020720486,0.0032009052,0.005532556,0.010099512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04347808,0.0005752095,0.00062801887,0.011836249,0.021990435,0.003853628,0.0040512085,0.006925449,0.00041977773],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005394751,0.00022444146,0.037296206,0.00032725095,0.00011714396,0.0011305144,0.08204973,0.0024652132,0.00048598045,0.7973744,0.032771874,0.045217864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039079075,0.00014112922,0.35279512,0.0012443893,0.00037420972,0.00021198957,0.16651215,0.0034383242,0.001270767,0.046904568,0.42614552,0.00057111966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99683255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99848574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23467568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23467568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24807082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8876677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603873046","doi":"","title":"What the U.S. Can teach Canada About Supreme Court Appointments","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.016975498232780026,"score_gpt":0.25660928416078543,"score_spread":0.2396337859280054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2603873046","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008473911,0.011258778,0.0004382799,0.7929095,0.0038824468,0.000022016407,0.00031103412,0.00010388192,0.18260023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36063206,0.028158464,0.0020802086,0.38772425,0.0025578756,0.000054390686,0.00041255786,0.0001878466,0.21819244],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963062,0.0005512942,0.000039905193,0.00020087392,0.0010583313,0.0018434168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883024,0.0012171504,0.00031804148,0.00018497137,0.0028964276,0.0070809],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027503949,0.0003711865,0.00034786493,0.0012625379,0.02859021,0.008324469,0.001178288,0.004804207,0.036248654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009391175,0.00029806388,0.0003706821,0.0017800117,0.008445639,0.004385646,0.0021410466,0.007996107,0.004123109],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018551395,0.00005863911,0.0045154975,0.000086942455,0.000010214974,0.00012987058,0.0055806963,0.00010510401,0.00016534646,0.05845347,0.88234425,0.048531465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013364521,0.000019004345,0.010004282,0.00047383626,0.000013239351,0.00004915897,0.012453576,0.000055927023,0.00011679281,0.006913387,0.9698343,0.000053176187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96418166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9923194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058354273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058354273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14903846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42339188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604134551","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0002","title":"Which Governments Come Out Ahead?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Cooperative federalism; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law and economics; Public administration; Business; Political economy; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04691081642210825,"score_gpt":0.3473193465272077,"score_spread":0.30040853010509944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604134551","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6025942,0.0020124232,0.006746684,0.04325851,0.0002066521,0.000056578843,0.0002767413,0.000040502346,0.34480777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99722856,0.00025967768,0.00021290136,0.0005095618,0.000019076011,0.0000052695655,0.000018226881,0.0000047590934,0.0017420964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959025,0.0018461755,0.00017160336,0.0004901624,0.00054741726,0.0010421922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98913467,0.0061076437,0.002066131,0.00055908726,0.0009319304,0.0012005921],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003594856,0.000102889484,0.00030736803,0.0016614003,0.0032028533,0.006798939,0.0005886245,0.0015604456,0.010926924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014698226,0.00017123682,0.00031847073,0.0018724782,0.0039778394,0.00796215,0.0025126606,0.0021245102,0.00085233635],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054897842,0.00004705474,0.033723254,0.000071473114,0.000017421267,0.00035961534,0.009929179,0.0007029115,0.00013131095,0.9326655,0.0045515667,0.017745899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031755444,0.00008321058,0.04991031,0.00070226577,0.000047392205,0.00053535117,0.16974567,0.002736547,0.00096043665,0.68705696,0.08812831,0.000061860155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046859416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007393409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010926924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003408369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003268967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036554217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604408756","doi":"","title":"Quasi-Constitutional Statutes: A Theory","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.027466332883952876,"score_gpt":0.28982838567485586,"score_spread":0.26236205279090297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604408756","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043860853,0.0034777406,0.27954653,0.045567032,0.0009434363,0.00025150526,0.00060117536,0.00016980089,0.6255819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92875624,0.0017224785,0.02567635,0.004810699,0.0015601856,0.0005027448,0.00021270024,0.000106179104,0.036652487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948127,0.002626478,0.00020298974,0.00068768987,0.0010087575,0.00066137576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9795793,0.01581865,0.0009881922,0.0019570696,0.0011286318,0.0005281299],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007753372,0.0005801517,0.0011267515,0.0046564885,0.005087386,0.008715804,0.0028748468,0.0061225635,0.019317405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015702663,0.000952096,0.0016748728,0.004154815,0.036511373,0.017651895,0.0038056022,0.0069191745,0.001696681],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.994799e-7,0.0000019671866,0.000011014693,0.000001347724,3.3357938e-7,0.0000013775334,0.000035842528,0.00002694312,0.0000013799187,0.9995561,0.0001835462,0.00017953801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051979423,0.0000025940324,0.00003385659,0.0000081053195,0.0000020664631,0.0000076404,0.00007041168,0.00035155247,0.000009701555,0.9969873,0.002520105,0.0000015569798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004303726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035619284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019317405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047457763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004944301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06462318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605280893","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avw016","title":"Po Jen Yap, Constitutional Dialogue in Common Law Asia (Oxford University Press, 2015)†","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Dialogic; Commonwealth; Law; Judicial review; Constitutional review; Constitutional law; Political science; High Court; Constitutional theory; Common law; Constitutional court; Sociology; Constitution; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.04189211310654754,"score_gpt":0.31598301007100676,"score_spread":0.2740908969644592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605280893","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034736723,0.3901946,0.0034619172,0.27254587,0.006215681,0.00004163061,0.0004211122,0.000101570586,0.3235439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23793888,0.2682164,0.0034120327,0.04904739,0.0066491263,0.0002604604,0.00053759577,0.00019332583,0.43374485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903846,0.00043845814,0.00004869843,0.00012676763,0.00024125192,0.0001063202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990752,0.00054552505,0.000101002595,0.000052746153,0.00011348957,0.0001120643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015693562,0.000673582,0.00030360548,0.00096069,0.0033271967,0.006187496,0.00072755624,0.003517763,0.015411276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028905112,0.0003763219,0.00026189353,0.0017138395,0.005221991,0.01053332,0.0020947163,0.0040900563,0.0032102785],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016950105,0.00001556275,0.00023910879,0.00016728516,0.0000053497256,0.000114271614,0.0032115777,0.00023251606,0.00007417056,0.5843509,0.3795538,0.032018628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006563745,0.0000068560853,0.0007607219,0.00032485428,0.0000029745213,0.00007979892,0.0014198229,0.00015026504,0.00006715105,0.10808332,0.88908625,0.000011385098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014417101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019945746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015411276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004213067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055306046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051555872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605427376","doi":"","title":"The Court and Administrative Law: Models of Rights Protection","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Deference; Charter; Ultra vires; Political science; Administrative law; Law; Judicial review; Judicial deference; Public law; Common law; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Economics; Doctrine","score_opus":0.040943929514015126,"score_gpt":0.31789702874018777,"score_spread":0.2769530992261726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605427376","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03031454,0.007120065,0.20558335,0.065325454,0.00044797614,0.00015383695,0.00029968988,0.00027156438,0.69048357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94808644,0.003275569,0.017866034,0.0021925012,0.0003972456,0.00013292833,0.00010323601,0.000072302624,0.02787374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98757195,0.005473027,0.00022321696,0.0009525132,0.00415741,0.0016218077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98954916,0.005555816,0.00083450926,0.0014015061,0.0019161085,0.00074299664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010569805,0.0010361894,0.0009294314,0.0036739206,0.0052395994,0.015551091,0.0045589088,0.0050699683,0.011746272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017882884,0.0006826707,0.0014992951,0.0047099236,0.038116865,0.013865127,0.0037504165,0.0045067947,0.0012498195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016379346,0.0000022747781,0.000050426086,0.0000057536763,0.0000014182065,0.000006235653,0.0001362312,0.00072224595,0.000005560971,0.9981092,0.0002592777,0.0006998476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012870403,0.000009676089,0.00030231697,0.00005115859,0.000008920476,0.000025149186,0.00031213253,0.007927657,0.000032279815,0.97881377,0.012490451,0.000013519077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38014266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26943207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38014266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04001172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03252844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605783949","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0029","title":"Interpreting the<i>Charter</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Human rights; Law; Covenant; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; Convention; International human rights law; Politics; Interpretation (philosophy); Fundamental rights; Linguistic rights; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Right to property; Sociology; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.03706271426520755,"score_gpt":0.24729189542655725,"score_spread":0.2102291811613497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605783949","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059151556,0.0048650294,0.009316805,0.013310897,0.0014342704,0.00006328165,0.00018136782,0.00010005351,0.96481323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61165917,0.01134495,0.012133689,0.010188744,0.0013818817,0.000109437446,0.0004616602,0.00042676725,0.35229364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99643457,0.0009266061,0.000078714016,0.00026781694,0.0018032662,0.0004890155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99744934,0.0010073917,0.00011151208,0.00016687666,0.0011757604,0.0000891231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005171054,0.0004121462,0.0004014881,0.0025811424,0.006956779,0.011176551,0.0017044945,0.0016090774,0.008212986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058496394,0.00020269086,0.0002628556,0.0020705746,0.021546828,0.0026408164,0.0017855479,0.0048731277,0.0009340664],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027171013,0.000002822575,0.000055486962,0.000028248709,0.0000010100798,0.000038984745,0.0038698413,0.00014670125,0.00012732661,0.96412945,0.02490305,0.006694216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046149785,0.000008140489,0.0005429966,0.00051347906,0.000008654916,0.000061255225,0.005558803,0.00057897554,0.00076932367,0.14102231,0.8509031,0.000028424394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.552837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6050418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9717342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028265754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03526765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8995928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606376738","doi":"10.1017/s0008423916001207","title":"Back to the Future: Historical Political Science and the Promise of Canadian Political Development","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Constitution; Political science; Federalism; Foundation (evidence); American political science; Environmental ethics; Social science; Sociology; Political economy; Law","score_opus":0.03727073667867665,"score_gpt":0.290084384350863,"score_spread":0.25281364767218634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606376738","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04162426,0.039536934,0.0044122403,0.2782389,0.0015835792,0.000046922745,0.00065700285,0.00007114013,0.6338291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9570087,0.015030457,0.001937666,0.007172128,0.00049304013,0.000020287043,0.00013091188,0.000043631073,0.018163132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925052,0.0017477537,0.00014092222,0.00057881675,0.00312189,0.0019054096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812816,0.006245559,0.00083024486,0.00089038385,0.008922982,0.0018293463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008542441,0.0003404964,0.00046972855,0.008056509,0.02699543,0.02145934,0.0018413644,0.0024037343,0.009230592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021334143,0.0002344662,0.00031935243,0.012359332,0.03667285,0.006507478,0.0029093593,0.0037572247,0.00031667564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013070847,0.0000038130916,0.0013975513,0.00008992201,0.000008182468,0.00010108093,0.011590455,0.00023296429,0.000055913133,0.95850945,0.015518215,0.012479388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069080024,0.000010316834,0.0092634335,0.0008635223,0.000036007226,0.00009710017,0.04332854,0.0006173926,0.00031266132,0.19962116,0.74578065,0.00006228971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96455574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.981778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8249223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17507769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16504768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95679295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607452614","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v10n3p13","title":"Constitution-Building Bodies and the Sequencing of Public Participation A Comparison of Seven Empirical Cases","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Vetenskapsrådet","keywords":"Constitution; Compromise; Politics; Authoritarianism; Democracy; Negotiation; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Promulgation; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.1865597003000454,"score_gpt":0.43291092015940735,"score_spread":0.24635121985936195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607452614","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9642677,0.00024468958,0.0019102908,0.00037045087,0.000008932268,0.0003576204,0.000087463435,0.000009171305,0.032743737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975439,0.00016071304,0.0008910525,0.00003117226,0.0000037064758,0.0002158176,0.00008529327,0.0000059069116,0.0010625346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9690535,0.02126296,0.0017404285,0.0011577351,0.0032157486,0.0035696225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8387642,0.14060451,0.007965861,0.006401515,0.0049949614,0.0012689641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021046024,0.0002952109,0.0004811562,0.0067978697,0.0075859954,0.0051255403,0.0016056447,0.0020657924,0.00420535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.078895494,0.0005430562,0.0004099763,0.007270029,0.013528337,0.0039696954,0.004849571,0.0022840567,0.00039874093],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006572787,0.0016987026,0.13649355,0.000528407,0.000058184753,0.0043822797,0.19913809,0.0051460396,0.0012776632,0.5990947,0.0020272145,0.049497902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004950477,0.00086697546,0.20642649,0.0014589423,0.00020729394,0.0026680082,0.62336344,0.012435321,0.0072677485,0.086358994,0.05825049,0.00020129362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01122781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011817653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021046024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009119559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039676805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11130339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607701913","doi":"","title":"Un regard québécois sur le droit constitutionnel","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.027868515235029086,"score_gpt":0.23910967993242502,"score_spread":0.21124116469739593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607701913","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07740828,0.027794097,0.002849881,0.16727154,0.0022168295,0.000025265539,0.00029705348,0.000059972266,0.72207695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8031334,0.0058072377,0.0011285341,0.015149387,0.0010153379,0.000040061666,0.00008336655,0.00007924015,0.17356339],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99519217,0.0020457294,0.0000832236,0.000516108,0.0011547396,0.0010080688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99596965,0.002241358,0.00018964474,0.00025452286,0.0009809526,0.00036389902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037851913,0.00047733987,0.00070443854,0.0025240616,0.017273137,0.013068472,0.0014562439,0.006162543,0.013104574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008963563,0.0003966837,0.00040412747,0.0029948645,0.019967364,0.0038113676,0.0017285477,0.010189923,0.00062002445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010992818,0.000008578893,0.00041647188,0.000014108531,0.000005008918,0.00007171356,0.002524054,0.000082854356,0.00009352507,0.9813486,0.0109607605,0.004463408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003954413,0.000025956362,0.009060807,0.00044317896,0.000029579674,0.00023083767,0.01247692,0.0007421865,0.0004540245,0.209342,0.7670783,0.000076653334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8590274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91396314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14097261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037203133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042378064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28360564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607826394","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0044","title":"The Role of Theory in Canadian Constitutional Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Federalism; Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Separation of powers; Context (archaeology); Constitutional law; Limited government; Constitutionalism; Sociology; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.020439219588101402,"score_gpt":0.22379526418867857,"score_spread":0.20335604460057716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607826394","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0066680796,0.017656643,0.0053628855,0.05575785,0.0010577161,0.00003594467,0.00012932709,0.000057969977,0.9132736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8227009,0.019986788,0.007981574,0.007401621,0.0007966232,0.000112634036,0.00019335673,0.00013497072,0.14069143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939569,0.0023614252,0.00013253532,0.000628049,0.0019767764,0.0009442872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99256927,0.0043603233,0.0001906266,0.00052369555,0.0018075992,0.0005484363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00809481,0.000509215,0.0006215255,0.0054578506,0.015762959,0.01381911,0.0022350918,0.0027403398,0.010970126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010526125,0.00032990696,0.00046819908,0.0059989505,0.0630314,0.005091966,0.0031463364,0.0048508802,0.0007053515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.9532566e-7,9.5001377e-7,0.000028357483,0.0000106332645,6.191103e-7,0.000008706962,0.0006875758,0.000088972585,0.000005151831,0.9942029,0.0033224456,0.0016429528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009109423,0.000004184933,0.00046879868,0.00025937922,0.000007740458,0.00002654716,0.0019613097,0.0011614653,0.00005811659,0.6985241,0.2975026,0.000016566259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89099014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88211244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86792916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13207082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11105452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9582454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610315011","doi":"","title":"Administrative Law Cases at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Citizenship; Tribunal; Immigration law; Appeal; Nationality; Immigration; Sociology; Humanities; Politics; Art","score_opus":0.027400335092800886,"score_gpt":0.29274553003371756,"score_spread":0.2653451949409167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610315011","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05380654,0.017884487,0.0014099418,0.09970366,0.0027502286,0.00023651037,0.0017529045,0.00021904863,0.82223666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6839528,0.009220149,0.0019969747,0.084371015,0.0015333414,0.00015408966,0.0009445097,0.00013513584,0.21769202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98268443,0.000969634,0.00044843656,0.0012193555,0.007990546,0.006687547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98269457,0.0054576327,0.00068624027,0.00060392194,0.009112638,0.0014449707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004996407,0.00064984564,0.00054856733,0.0037180698,0.03774035,0.014824272,0.004046809,0.012894725,0.014197778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019818194,0.0009305204,0.0009956761,0.0060052145,0.010128265,0.002013466,0.00388955,0.009636009,0.0012614995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005281621,0.000041954587,0.0043232366,0.00020699552,0.00006636943,0.0027099377,0.008102055,0.00089498813,0.0006579559,0.5221593,0.44354084,0.01724348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036971436,0.00001671547,0.01247491,0.000568547,0.00009818328,0.0004163716,0.005143465,0.0006440488,0.0005897473,0.011477771,0.96834755,0.00018565878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9886981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99291706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1412414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1412414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16277327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99603826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610361054","doi":"","title":"State Action Doctrine and the Logic of Constitutional Containment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Political science; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Constitutional law; Constitutional review; Constitutional economics; Law and economics; Sociology; Constitution","score_opus":0.06319184475315223,"score_gpt":0.35058092755523285,"score_spread":0.28738908280208064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610361054","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034534242,0.006584963,0.117621034,0.044775706,0.000544463,0.00009064665,0.00009486696,0.00017308857,0.795581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95797056,0.0015660855,0.014966518,0.0052719386,0.00058743666,0.00024743294,0.000049018057,0.000058034228,0.01928297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99276525,0.0036071225,0.00027225888,0.0011583046,0.0014275844,0.00076937117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99659157,0.0022887134,0.00023989454,0.0003601984,0.00038096507,0.00013867914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007032127,0.00034481622,0.00057554356,0.0018648178,0.005877991,0.00731497,0.0017771915,0.0050895293,0.0040459842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006032816,0.0003791743,0.00076155114,0.0012352295,0.053906545,0.008542012,0.0042858776,0.00642824,0.0005447154],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.2527856e-7,4.8403626e-7,0.000006944223,0.0000015526401,3.045056e-7,0.000004392584,0.00013483141,0.000025954003,0.0000074906366,0.9994941,0.000079867066,0.00024371613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010794223,0.0000067117844,0.000046966783,0.000031844993,0.0000042224856,0.000021406426,0.00021862642,0.00040656267,0.00012135143,0.9782682,0.020857317,0.0000059489603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009450653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048665972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009450653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009216099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075643393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06686777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610473374","doi":"","title":"Dimensions of Indian Judicial Activism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cross-cultural communication","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Parliament; Political science; Supreme court; Judicial activism; Judicial independence; Constitution of India; Duty; Judicial review; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.05979466172094192,"score_gpt":0.396167824456758,"score_spread":0.3363731627358161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610473374","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04269007,0.0030393023,0.0013352578,0.01785839,0.00028326115,0.000055070326,0.00003824977,0.000030169833,0.9346702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9597866,0.0018214952,0.0007390957,0.007862757,0.0006713063,0.000116290204,0.000044210272,0.00004217677,0.02891609],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894733,0.0032762038,0.0003261248,0.0011512978,0.002701157,0.003071888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935743,0.0030834167,0.00077676,0.0005308341,0.0007856637,0.0012490792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004405006,0.00035160684,0.00042459148,0.0035746694,0.01785093,0.023755798,0.0020561921,0.0035890448,0.0077388883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077328193,0.00037693477,0.0005522041,0.0047562085,0.030137938,0.0034965419,0.009986067,0.010354545,0.00094602956],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010941346,0.0000462644,0.0008983452,0.000052572275,0.0000060682555,0.00018041286,0.03351629,0.00006111375,0.00035611656,0.9495792,0.005640032,0.00965262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033541593,0.00005157526,0.009677,0.00056060794,0.000047557336,0.00075097947,0.059787687,0.0005135389,0.00071386533,0.18629406,0.7415063,0.00006332333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013762519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018860552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023755798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011773193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011447792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08542091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611970165","doi":"","title":"The All-Affected Principle: Does it Create a Right to Vote?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Space (punctuation); Politics; Political science; Association (psychology); Space Science; Media studies; Sociology; Mathematics education; Law; Psychology; Computer science; Epistemology; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0221721618270777,"score_gpt":0.29686691487386985,"score_spread":0.27469475304679214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611970165","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037558015,0.00070936023,0.0078062946,0.06508928,0.00053248694,0.00003233322,0.00020206685,0.000023709108,0.8880465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9699458,0.0002650464,0.00081615633,0.0049456214,0.00031092562,0.000023973038,0.00004990505,0.000035242483,0.023607304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99178153,0.003556773,0.00022013662,0.0011367467,0.00143491,0.0018698628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929923,0.0029351127,0.000748971,0.0015864633,0.0009949976,0.0007421286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008450896,0.00023697302,0.0007660588,0.0006213614,0.0060917763,0.006330682,0.0012399288,0.0048858346,0.022002585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019343851,0.00034162888,0.0004284994,0.0009607848,0.019406408,0.0049615954,0.002967615,0.0055324696,0.0019475669],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013862493,0.000007921845,0.00043461943,0.000010552397,0.000007651523,0.000026306188,0.0005921129,0.000062383515,0.00004018777,0.99068767,0.005713605,0.0024031305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006528267,0.00002162964,0.0031688113,0.00006327721,0.000045843604,0.00008336047,0.0019108946,0.00034657,0.00028566338,0.88876015,0.10523163,0.000016924581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019476011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048138466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022002585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045025153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058472077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073605955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612211185","doi":"10.1108/s1059-433720170000072003","title":"The Nursery Years of ‘Judicial Activism’: From A Historian’s Shorthand to Media Catchphrase 1947–1962","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in law, politics, and society","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Terminology; Politics; Term (time); Media studies; Law; Political activism; Political science; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05985605103574868,"score_gpt":0.3361861451319482,"score_spread":0.2763300940961995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612211185","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0613055,0.1452864,0.0011350244,0.12757218,0.0055106585,0.000030550473,0.00029526008,0.00005245647,0.6588119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83208776,0.042296894,0.00034220022,0.014509244,0.009305831,0.00005090919,0.00012113074,0.00015215267,0.10113385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847287,0.00077635417,0.000049613678,0.00018735223,0.0003637493,0.00015002978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954665,0.003525319,0.0002937931,0.00020727502,0.00024830553,0.0002588616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022374368,0.000282414,0.0002577335,0.0022978003,0.004472081,0.008299275,0.00043365962,0.0018138101,0.006423563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004884381,0.0002425707,0.00011754939,0.002582207,0.01661599,0.0049913125,0.0025104543,0.0050326358,0.00080282305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004189639,0.000034700486,0.0006774854,0.0001533973,0.0000055870323,0.00017385621,0.066569634,0.00006888844,0.00024974797,0.81226426,0.08372349,0.03603718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054046614,0.000016268978,0.0019065783,0.00056464376,0.0000026638202,0.000090621725,0.01151405,0.000040398725,0.00022941087,0.017675031,0.9679469,0.000008068989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0088871885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016093388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0088871885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006963308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022344028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050522625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612301594","doi":"10.4324/9781315400068","title":"Debating Judicial Appointments in an Age of Diversity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Political science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.09202277233623969,"score_gpt":0.33274381584323026,"score_spread":0.24072104350699058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612301594","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17408961,0.016937952,0.017955996,0.4276844,0.0077501624,0.00012544544,0.00011376052,0.00010920248,0.3552334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9147326,0.0029439619,0.003382284,0.037355978,0.004485317,0.000079789854,0.000045406214,0.00011393499,0.036860693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9113386,0.04451451,0.0049837986,0.0064450814,0.015053938,0.017664112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85352767,0.094147876,0.011680065,0.0073820385,0.015246057,0.018016232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08285932,0.00025260472,0.0010192211,0.0026286067,0.022581242,0.021563914,0.0032109197,0.010649577,0.007638182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15706828,0.00092370453,0.0007502314,0.0026712385,0.033727713,0.017457087,0.018978091,0.019515507,0.0015486726],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005188309,0.000024866016,0.0027427142,0.00010813901,0.000012817409,0.00031280302,0.058418587,0.0003814029,0.00029365666,0.8703878,0.031528044,0.0357373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045296198,0.00013837642,0.010877636,0.0014758665,0.000026588472,0.00041936405,0.07086461,0.0008616017,0.0005608252,0.2925058,0.6220684,0.00015565025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020336876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046766337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08285932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024462136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025111642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4382072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612725658","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1038","title":"“Reconciling Rights” the Supreme Court of Canada's Approach To Competing Charter Rights","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.038808129526871606,"score_gpt":0.2747366242445672,"score_spread":0.23592849471769559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612725658","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035855554,0.007243944,0.02800447,0.22988242,0.0020605663,0.00034425667,0.0007607399,0.00016669264,0.6956814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7922691,0.0032935282,0.028480355,0.05394259,0.0010920301,0.0002935151,0.00023536403,0.0001570086,0.12023641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97463685,0.004876775,0.0005657379,0.0020976868,0.011558373,0.0062645315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909285,0.002964012,0.00022392972,0.0007105401,0.0041647824,0.00100821],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013441243,0.00081724057,0.0013463771,0.005301294,0.02783435,0.026492178,0.006578382,0.01719538,0.005621971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022576014,0.0011621768,0.00139481,0.0059995963,0.03057319,0.0063119205,0.004495163,0.01625319,0.0003995135],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003073007,0.000004541476,0.00007861831,0.000008411214,0.000006217314,0.00002120017,0.0007662009,0.00027365852,0.000027952723,0.98853534,0.008143152,0.0021315282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007218057,0.000012407071,0.0015828613,0.00023456462,0.00008808228,0.00006515439,0.0025161945,0.0030929216,0.00048587206,0.73262745,0.2590896,0.00013266761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96092224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98165613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.119751774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.119751774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23882435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.868864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613081353","doi":"10.14232/phd.3942","title":"Alapjogi aktivizmus a Supreme Court gazdaságszabályozási tárgyú ügyeiben (1890-1937)","year":2017,"lang":"hu","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University; Washington State Department of Labor and Industries; Ohio State University","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03959112055947703,"score_gpt":0.33054680458376934,"score_spread":0.2909556840242923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613081353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5448656,0.019458797,0.0006128548,0.014041743,0.00087952265,0.000055812077,0.0011872554,0.000038360908,0.41886008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9125036,0.0048919176,0.0003140884,0.0010537729,0.0001473135,0.00003461478,0.00026832937,0.000020132593,0.08076626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952126,0.00008793361,0.000020523465,0.000063408246,0.00009503848,0.00021183303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997323,0.00009331111,0.000053166106,0.000017839742,0.00006806562,0.00003530087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090541976,0.0001961299,0.00024563118,0.0007576423,0.0036106107,0.0028951892,0.000277058,0.001406369,0.006796573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012520304,0.0002031316,0.00017683145,0.0012936402,0.0020369464,0.0012012275,0.0012962784,0.002408663,0.0009675546],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017528966,0.00013788907,0.0180546,0.00021211122,0.000030470483,0.0013268399,0.022675708,0.0004660696,0.0012733983,0.8330585,0.05281256,0.0697766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004301862,0.00013360035,0.18451324,0.00065536884,0.000080550766,0.0005082977,0.016275601,0.00033599263,0.0029047683,0.041768078,0.7527208,0.000060620525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023616787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06501914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023616787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040444722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047483426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046958625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613106606","doi":"","title":"L’Obligation De Faire Adopter La Version Française Des Textes Constitutionnels Canadiens (The Obligation to Adopt the French Version of Canadian Constitutional Texts)","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Obligation; Art; Law","score_opus":0.013903925745154588,"score_gpt":0.2483120575845127,"score_spread":0.2344081318393581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613106606","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036563955,0.008945957,0.0048223403,0.07878366,0.0024877884,0.00018441668,0.0012767187,0.00019834482,0.86673677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5990418,0.0043064645,0.0062489547,0.012899203,0.0005825371,0.00014761636,0.0005839379,0.00023357126,0.37595594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98784965,0.0018675382,0.00043004635,0.0013152754,0.0056395037,0.002897964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890298,0.0021956954,0.00049824413,0.00091875024,0.0065011955,0.0008562342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007440343,0.00054073037,0.00032483976,0.0021856502,0.015495026,0.01654073,0.0015437588,0.0051382533,0.017024158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016634911,0.0004086529,0.0004918126,0.002493323,0.012731863,0.0034582005,0.0028337622,0.0047235447,0.0025789079],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042633954,0.000016708887,0.0014218559,0.000121779565,0.000013289965,0.0002437219,0.021959754,0.00025512063,0.0011427139,0.85642695,0.0858898,0.03246568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010535357,0.000010182987,0.0047555133,0.00018707702,0.000013345937,0.00010569973,0.0047838856,0.00014313999,0.0005713885,0.009211192,0.9801384,0.000069521164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95958173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9584603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9108575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08914251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09649498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64677715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613621158","doi":"","title":"The Unbearable Lightness of Balancing: Towards a Theoretical Framework for the Doctrinal Complexity in Proportionality Analysis in Constitutional Adjudication","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Adjudication; Writ; Charter; Law; Political science; Doctrine; Law and economics; Constitutional law; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.031726151012262754,"score_gpt":0.3366598236446587,"score_spread":0.3049336726323959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613621158","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036630034,0.0044373334,0.44233865,0.09113562,0.0010701012,0.00020209338,0.00012844049,0.0001541399,0.4239037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91053206,0.0018261716,0.058860157,0.0065006507,0.0011955899,0.000380617,0.0000711373,0.00016477714,0.020468744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9843717,0.01050076,0.00031836567,0.0012813543,0.0025244493,0.0010033926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906538,0.0064806277,0.00073285104,0.00078950694,0.0010073031,0.000335748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015981799,0.0007636812,0.0008058421,0.0033919653,0.009890034,0.016512372,0.003632188,0.00598779,0.005243294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018000707,0.0006401089,0.0010882221,0.0025243077,0.07934969,0.018990833,0.007359466,0.011495332,0.0007946001],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013926132,0.0000018852876,0.000021859221,0.0000030231513,4.1852886e-7,0.000007165842,0.0006511116,0.00008092453,0.000014572132,0.9985103,0.00019303698,0.0005143126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006038872,0.000005281523,0.000063725536,0.000032000942,0.0000023896262,0.000012127842,0.0006650002,0.0010046135,0.00006374619,0.98740816,0.010729625,0.0000072383646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01700341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017609982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01700341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012942122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0093182055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09390211},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2615095983","doi":"10.1017/s0008423917000014","title":"The Politics of Judicial Appointment: Do Party Connections Impede the Appointment of Women to Canada's Federally Appointed Courts?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; Western University; Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Government (linguistics); Proxy (statistics); Political science; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.01959050836813158,"score_gpt":0.29197511719766683,"score_spread":0.27238460882953525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2615095983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9505732,0.00031340905,0.0002099735,0.007669584,0.00003481403,0.000046208534,0.000277357,0.000008556732,0.040866777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970323,0.00012448149,0.000054253618,0.00040281494,0.000012617442,0.00000627344,0.00003294523,0.000003266384,0.0023309682],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959382,0.0006438835,0.00009515495,0.0003420461,0.000932515,0.0020483125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9848481,0.003518895,0.004104443,0.0003618921,0.0021017713,0.005065011],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022905848,0.000117445416,0.00036719014,0.0010986174,0.00958868,0.0039654877,0.0010629315,0.00084363896,0.009897133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020420378,0.00022065874,0.00019454584,0.0020190023,0.003580073,0.0008875588,0.0020864916,0.0014758918,0.00035916266],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039130158,0.00020867726,0.8551498,0.00011121071,0.000078108285,0.0008388699,0.03922671,0.00058888,0.001384859,0.046537735,0.012029116,0.04345485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004573406,0.000059368,0.92876536,0.00015070055,0.00005776995,0.000111822534,0.036866713,0.0006094567,0.0003222438,0.0026061293,0.030374335,0.000030426372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9487871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9862059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051212907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0387743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052266326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28132856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2615242767","doi":"10.1089/elj.2016.0410","title":"Three Narratives About Canadian Election Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Election law; Law; Narrative; Legislation; Campaign finance; Federal election; Public administration; Politics; Voting","score_opus":0.02467884156776447,"score_gpt":0.32718143395171,"score_spread":0.30250259238394556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2615242767","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12270042,0.005300123,0.0019334992,0.18727946,0.0008267454,0.00010301007,0.00065369776,0.00009930351,0.6811038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9244938,0.0027462426,0.0010518982,0.012348155,0.00012724184,0.00007985899,0.00021171963,0.00006864634,0.058872413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.991512,0.001446778,0.00016439914,0.00075629697,0.0030583632,0.0030621486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941777,0.0016579473,0.00032782383,0.00022470683,0.002354262,0.0012574865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055497093,0.0007051737,0.00044688987,0.003884041,0.07286734,0.017767712,0.0030017504,0.0047623655,0.009573333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011132407,0.00045065678,0.00052427116,0.006741346,0.032579973,0.0053334776,0.005403365,0.0077505694,0.00055756647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019443634,0.000012341989,0.0016481436,0.00005018246,0.0000044900526,0.0005321199,0.18646373,0.0001566094,0.00018585095,0.7651753,0.037929904,0.00782197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001069252,0.00000830246,0.0040360945,0.0002542888,0.000017971337,0.0001908974,0.24247685,0.00036826349,0.00019790966,0.030236028,0.7221043,0.000098436816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9870281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99137926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7569511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24304892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16793491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.877956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2615320268","doi":"10.26530/oapen_627652","title":"Courts in Federal Countries : Federalists or Unitarists?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Jurisprudence; Law; Comparability; Power (physics); Federal court; Federalism; Public administration; Politics; Supreme court","score_opus":0.0396284747836156,"score_gpt":0.2712792012192337,"score_spread":0.23165072643561813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2615320268","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02564176,0.032743834,0.0027807937,0.045387767,0.001436418,0.000028842365,0.00006589949,0.000083596984,0.8918311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80635834,0.015550708,0.0020971303,0.011321908,0.0016268175,0.00006340487,0.000106312866,0.000079412326,0.16279587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982016,0.00078214036,0.000057867517,0.00020942334,0.00033004308,0.00041884088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840266,0.00078036916,0.0001608431,0.00024251106,0.0002567791,0.00015692417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014117131,0.00014340242,0.00029799456,0.0012712762,0.0047956062,0.0076852357,0.0006136853,0.0015635391,0.0055369474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037277937,0.00022662162,0.00024635778,0.002193356,0.008665317,0.0052727736,0.0015302633,0.0040160418,0.0008645123],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022469185,0.000005972613,0.00020743553,0.000012835325,0.000001704846,0.000018468736,0.0023665032,0.000049902792,0.000027190114,0.9648122,0.018203948,0.01429153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010909016,0.000024927776,0.0038878901,0.0003188068,0.00001360446,0.00009691051,0.005361529,0.00036013217,0.00014638327,0.30029038,0.6894725,0.000016076267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011175412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018904917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011175412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047036977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039806855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03412789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616110939","doi":"10.3138/9781487511470-004","title":"1. Introduction: Courts in Federal Countries","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.025375998151703952,"score_gpt":0.23860930382614323,"score_spread":0.21323330567443927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2616110939","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018734267,0.033035025,0.0009849488,0.005819562,0.0016586026,0.000025340909,0.0001815956,0.00005813296,0.95636344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09984005,0.061168868,0.0019945465,0.007490079,0.003929288,0.00008286963,0.0006368719,0.000137627,0.8247197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996655,0.000097137825,0.000016517624,0.000047188612,0.00012349398,0.000050208262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964213,0.00019698023,0.000021259262,0.000034232642,0.00008002148,0.000025402787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029552093,0.00030532942,0.00023575743,0.0013331479,0.0025834662,0.003414119,0.0005042845,0.0011795256,0.02856251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079520576,0.00015233588,0.00024152116,0.002460563,0.0020492228,0.0023185804,0.00081393257,0.0021201496,0.00509286],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005405471,0.000019439321,0.00017700708,0.00012504631,0.0000012001251,0.000060756658,0.0022841706,0.00021602625,0.000093953524,0.6807066,0.2762046,0.04010571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.603808e-7,0.0000042957417,0.0002509865,0.00022165263,8.470159e-7,0.000064194865,0.00030482296,0.00004497216,0.000037002508,0.023731032,0.9753365,0.0000025734282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007079029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008739772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02856251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002502099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001890826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09555113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620045244","doi":"10.26686/wgtn.17012060.v1","title":"The implications of a supreme law Bill of Rights for judicial appointments in New Zealand","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Political science; Bill of rights; Commission; Judicial review; Human rights","score_opus":0.026396855507976283,"score_gpt":0.3290383673521254,"score_spread":0.3026415118441491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620045244","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24370675,0.0031607135,0.0016378404,0.1621452,0.00078626047,0.00014543413,0.00015265834,0.000017126533,0.588248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96044254,0.0016596008,0.0006769047,0.0064936914,0.00016650948,0.000042082407,0.000024207458,0.000017219618,0.030477189],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98802257,0.003299189,0.00049690105,0.0010354266,0.0027496377,0.0043962956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99145997,0.003311676,0.0011261641,0.00043783674,0.001965073,0.0016993207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00861082,0.00021038076,0.00047574,0.0009987078,0.016940765,0.010981437,0.0018075986,0.0038472724,0.0062663467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027548954,0.00047741766,0.00047841168,0.0013447297,0.023182796,0.004435209,0.00397147,0.009587037,0.00037183677],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039808623,0.00003856486,0.002054872,0.000045997636,0.000007240133,0.0006551882,0.02502028,0.00030075802,0.00046274345,0.9517046,0.010026109,0.009643836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019363197,0.00014859608,0.079642616,0.0011396415,0.00011201794,0.0005457325,0.095181346,0.0022312715,0.0010204449,0.21522947,0.60422707,0.0003281081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90461576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9406044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90461576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08208043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07509143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.595538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620889541","doi":"","title":"The Supreme Court and the Conventions of the Constitution","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CentAUR (University of Reading)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Constitution; Political science; Precedent","score_opus":0.021405389479714404,"score_gpt":0.24513226203104263,"score_spread":0.22372687255132823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620889541","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026103487,0.014193296,0.0045851446,0.069000885,0.0007018322,0.000052206076,0.00017675226,0.00006396105,0.88512236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9250386,0.005373922,0.0021864283,0.007778143,0.00040666418,0.00003938081,0.00009822296,0.000051864372,0.059026863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913436,0.002407357,0.00019862306,0.0006440397,0.0034047223,0.0020016162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99585575,0.0017814566,0.00028530884,0.0003093633,0.0013560778,0.00041209097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054228553,0.0002764561,0.00039419456,0.0017611184,0.013305383,0.011864928,0.0015672371,0.004540996,0.0035514343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012774224,0.00033316726,0.00022041838,0.0026028648,0.037227754,0.002901669,0.0023071999,0.005786358,0.0004042928],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014165948,0.0000012126027,0.00008250312,0.0000064674146,0.0000012148366,0.000021846623,0.0011584307,0.000079793426,0.000031724987,0.99304366,0.0034504577,0.0021212562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022319397,0.00001472321,0.0044276463,0.00031008536,0.000023942408,0.000059716134,0.0047261138,0.0004634517,0.0002487387,0.5159699,0.4736743,0.000059101414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8608917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8900607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8608917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050594322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0881684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3670892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620945719","doi":"","title":"Developments in Access to Justice: Trial Lawyers' Association of British Columbia and the Supreme Court's Use of the Constitution to Protect Public Access to the Courts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Constitution; Dissent; Legislature; Economic Justice; Criticism; Constitutional law; Politics","score_opus":0.05770260569019013,"score_gpt":0.3168248264091571,"score_spread":0.25912222071896696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620945719","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44013935,0.015423409,0.0005754415,0.14205602,0.000465501,0.000029688385,0.00027206712,0.000015264937,0.40102327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9731476,0.0024249372,0.00014960527,0.006065634,0.00008704804,0.000010984501,0.000038713777,0.000010661336,0.01806487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99320483,0.0016856733,0.0001727015,0.000575846,0.0019302752,0.002430594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882627,0.005650938,0.0012620196,0.00031800172,0.0024155374,0.0020907985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005366764,0.00017526062,0.00043927247,0.0027152747,0.0164706,0.016430281,0.0018740142,0.0056039346,0.008978815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015371403,0.00044192854,0.00026183508,0.0062321653,0.016480368,0.003598872,0.0048137805,0.007989275,0.00036141946],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001399671,0.00012406502,0.020470662,0.000110534354,0.000057189412,0.00090186176,0.07214399,0.00033291185,0.00057681923,0.8519867,0.021004755,0.032150462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013309103,0.000092844304,0.27366725,0.0011319666,0.00019309511,0.00031997196,0.1240755,0.0006803997,0.00084755715,0.09166834,0.5068524,0.00033751616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9478134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9800469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06722739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06722739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06750274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48777115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621474074","doi":"","title":"Peter Hogg Tells the Amusing Story of Canadian Constitutional Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitutional law; Political science","score_opus":0.0611330806102806,"score_gpt":0.29895613059893567,"score_spread":0.23782304998865506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621474074","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004266117,0.013147784,0.00060963974,0.8188301,0.004906637,0.000016960992,0.0002501842,0.000046693134,0.15792595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21900395,0.013017246,0.0014715615,0.43110764,0.0035945252,0.00004638869,0.00018954085,0.00022971352,0.3313394],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99588364,0.0008324716,0.000052642885,0.00034338568,0.0016687798,0.0012190002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935457,0.0035414335,0.00014819068,0.0002000661,0.0017323801,0.000832233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033886638,0.0006282991,0.00057830475,0.0024804745,0.028314192,0.010440233,0.001553258,0.013343912,0.01502334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013741519,0.00044302648,0.00046983114,0.0033675535,0.023782568,0.0049403217,0.0021320912,0.012630216,0.0011977786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014556451,0.0000052550704,0.00041142904,0.000028457205,0.0000060498187,0.00020736444,0.0044093253,0.000071653805,0.000061631166,0.3725988,0.61642283,0.0057626786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063419334,0.0000031164109,0.00078435004,0.000101899466,0.000005165735,0.00005665494,0.0062455344,0.000060263566,0.00013266844,0.03651848,0.9560528,0.00003274405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93567634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9661397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06432366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04567745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041521497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3314147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622325340","doi":"10.1177/1532440017713314","title":"A Squire Index Update","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"State Politics & Policy Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":149,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Squire; Measure (data warehouse); Legislature; Session (web analytics); Index (typography); Quarter (Canadian coin); Professionalization; Political science; Computer science; Law; Geography; Data mining; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026122424876918196,"score_gpt":0.3540305868266478,"score_spread":0.3279081619497296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2622325340","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0069007846,0.0153022,0.0073215705,0.0787647,0.045662947,0.0012892633,0.27817112,0.008840247,0.5577472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03365301,0.017533429,0.019353664,0.021103855,0.029829456,0.0028997194,0.32549465,0.006784121,0.54334813],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99085134,0.0010034589,0.0013049726,0.0005622405,0.0056953295,0.0005826727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90094465,0.007955426,0.005487342,0.0054026395,0.07519992,0.0050100973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012345852,0.0014974695,0.0013835041,0.02259369,0.0017842879,0.008731869,0.0019953258,0.0018319067,0.15897074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08008074,0.00078266946,0.0012668739,0.015679795,0.0007629596,0.00749808,0.0041933777,0.0030201813,0.14881098],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004661133,0.000032775028,0.001602004,0.00022753309,0.000011503647,0.000019750994,0.000041061998,0.00005574242,0.00006262509,0.0019784998,0.94156057,0.054361176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017677912,0.000032215965,0.005083825,0.0004107179,0.000009854141,0.000043485354,0.00005072156,0.000093813505,0.00010844307,0.00093826087,0.9931919,0.000019144993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016063116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0163316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15897074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042090616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005639873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5318101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622551058","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199578610.013.0005","title":"Carving Out Typologies and Accounting for Differences Across Systems: Towards a Methodology of Transnational Constitutionalism","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Carving; Context (archaeology); Relation (database); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Geography; Politics; Computer science; Archaeology; Data mining; Democracy","score_opus":0.25808081922421444,"score_gpt":0.4191916085749884,"score_spread":0.16111078935077394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2622551058","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09638192,0.0017151871,0.7089697,0.004153204,0.0002517284,0.0002074664,0.00022267323,0.00015739666,0.18794072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8263725,0.0007605718,0.1681786,0.0002848445,0.000087963854,0.00049556885,0.00019780584,0.00018686027,0.0034353235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98592585,0.010863584,0.0004952005,0.0010560219,0.0012389587,0.0004203436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867993,0.0067414166,0.0011700015,0.0040888386,0.0009196527,0.00028079248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0129598295,0.0006719771,0.0011718425,0.0060238326,0.0041989307,0.009175126,0.0020729296,0.0013706438,0.0049576606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02157588,0.00046813302,0.0010708139,0.008085588,0.02292032,0.01953748,0.007848697,0.0039658886,0.0003774871],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040050127,0.0000041319877,0.0007709774,0.000021203334,0.000009355595,0.000021035881,0.0042655882,0.00047826767,0.000042603082,0.98840106,0.00014084307,0.0058409437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050049675,0.000008416588,0.00062777236,0.000056372566,0.000008719907,0.000047006044,0.0052110306,0.0019691766,0.00010165465,0.9804867,0.011468806,0.0000093501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036028652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052406015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0129598295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053746505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004067688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068538904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2623432494","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199208425.003.0008","title":"The Judicialization of Politics","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":221,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Politics; Demise; Legitimacy; Law; Judicial review; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03140422771101241,"score_gpt":0.24026067469388138,"score_spread":0.20885644698286898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2623432494","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011962141,0.023986913,0.0076159723,0.0216256,0.0009655785,0.000026558637,0.00004016297,0.000031935197,0.9337451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8281295,0.01603154,0.0018921418,0.008198062,0.002909996,0.00008760889,0.000074202384,0.000053502325,0.14262347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760675,0.0011785647,0.000081066864,0.0003330633,0.00061788777,0.0001825604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974476,0.0017102731,0.00014985331,0.00028107865,0.0003473938,0.00006374707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002066761,0.00018243775,0.0001908228,0.000806573,0.0022642163,0.004750709,0.00053782563,0.0014206188,0.003077521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033373989,0.00016359583,0.0001811336,0.00078229845,0.016797937,0.0025377085,0.001363463,0.0030098096,0.0004450881],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.5431725e-7,0.0000024004473,0.000029117342,0.000010695156,5.101706e-7,0.000012139407,0.00045248045,0.00008052486,0.000048252637,0.99366695,0.002992622,0.0027035389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008634485,0.000016413462,0.0006178588,0.00031723414,0.000003733101,0.00008014674,0.0009057453,0.0006789981,0.00032238665,0.5745441,0.42249697,0.00000785153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035205835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003865535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004750709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041632126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034532363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030206323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2623466269","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1047","title":"Judging the Judges: Judicial Independence and Reforms to the Supreme Court of Canada Appointment Process","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial independence; Supreme court; Law; Charter; Political science; Jurisprudence; Independence (probability theory); Separation of powers; Substantive due process; Context (archaeology); Constitutional law; Constitution","score_opus":0.027055425205928033,"score_gpt":0.2933051620193456,"score_spread":0.26624973681341757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2623466269","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24864335,0.01703821,0.006557204,0.29708385,0.0018647136,0.0005436761,0.00077878666,0.00018190594,0.4273083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9205355,0.002994198,0.0042255227,0.017667744,0.0004988417,0.000077788776,0.00013429369,0.000038209113,0.053827863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9751745,0.0041116304,0.00059223484,0.0017883457,0.008449448,0.009883839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9839512,0.00496232,0.00083196,0.0004907918,0.0059903455,0.0037733593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012696626,0.00029321987,0.00074730976,0.0027469061,0.032420486,0.0133691365,0.0043859417,0.0073578423,0.005772519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042040616,0.0007762438,0.00054213125,0.0043348307,0.010906873,0.002916966,0.003892095,0.008728131,0.00045954785],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012024085,0.000089256966,0.009896074,0.00014834572,0.00004656643,0.0008476512,0.02101947,0.0026001579,0.0009220211,0.8410561,0.07204771,0.0512064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033108014,0.00019292388,0.11642677,0.00078653736,0.000314656,0.00030364443,0.023967493,0.010166064,0.0018754535,0.09606845,0.74900556,0.00056147395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98996687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99686986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20226523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20226523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29751027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92525923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2624827431","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195335354.003.0028","title":"Democratic Reform: The Search for Guiding Principles","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Government (linguistics); Politics; Political science; Public administration; Democratic system; Electoral reform; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.10933789100433743,"score_gpt":0.2741597586145068,"score_spread":0.16482186761016937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2624827431","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007868003,0.021247508,0.016793655,0.2527038,0.00093307334,0.00012651146,0.000077796496,0.00007335628,0.7001763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84063596,0.01902094,0.014546898,0.03356041,0.001260941,0.0003458255,0.00009925752,0.00011321909,0.09041653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99141335,0.0046854094,0.00013887003,0.00056626584,0.0023852873,0.00081073894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951751,0.002506425,0.00021765908,0.000488803,0.0011977251,0.00041418374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011644145,0.00038587133,0.0004929347,0.0014331288,0.0069682286,0.009380894,0.0012316299,0.0026093046,0.0026192812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00928499,0.0002469365,0.0002610758,0.0013213268,0.04200473,0.0040550986,0.0028579673,0.008786465,0.00043529476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.7783086e-7,0.0000028580282,0.000012192248,0.000009209565,3.967402e-7,0.000002607347,0.00022566516,0.00008247694,0.000008032465,0.995908,0.0024639731,0.0012839406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000140081365,0.0000056675335,0.00017576451,0.00019616925,0.0000022143681,0.00001074703,0.0009125167,0.000482237,0.000116224546,0.84942156,0.14865759,0.0000053226527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.090838395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10475691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.090838395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033220593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045897547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24103338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626433881","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3150","title":"The Judicial Role in a Diverse Federation: Lessons from the Supreme Court of Canada, by Robert Schertzer","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; State (computer science); Federalism; Public administration; Supreme court; Law; Power (physics); Population; Corporate governance; Politics; Sociology; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.027442619741028955,"score_gpt":0.28258351784514074,"score_spread":0.2551408981041118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626433881","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030540973,0.03195877,0.0021455388,0.46525416,0.0021451346,0.000051516163,0.00012231628,0.00005091797,0.4677307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80259055,0.016004164,0.0019032601,0.07380519,0.0011361472,0.00006671365,0.0000859059,0.00008695377,0.10432104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938029,0.0012506105,0.00012455299,0.0006096064,0.0017817026,0.0024306572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99153495,0.0034342476,0.00022506776,0.00027447293,0.0024970341,0.0020342907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074292696,0.0003713231,0.00059981964,0.0016094192,0.050346818,0.014975449,0.0033570314,0.012528563,0.006318821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017120475,0.00044759695,0.00045984125,0.0023070616,0.028858824,0.006387849,0.0047586467,0.012702104,0.00066936517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011848001,0.000019931982,0.00073192845,0.000021900478,0.000007824735,0.00031839978,0.006024192,0.00038290868,0.000046961304,0.89693636,0.08592172,0.009576024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006379013,0.000015657284,0.0041549345,0.000598445,0.000030732695,0.00026188532,0.015974095,0.0014464365,0.00018410501,0.3317139,0.6454522,0.00010378895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9492633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97756094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92511374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07488627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14038824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54334044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W263041619","doi":"","title":"Lysander Spooner’s The Unconstitutionality of Slavery: A Case Study in Constitutional Hermeneutics, Ethical Argument, and Practical Reason","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sound Ideas (University of Puget Sound)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hermeneutics; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.0719415135001265,"score_gpt":0.3447929468083388,"score_spread":0.27285143330821227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W263041619","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3701549,0.0034014555,0.007818066,0.19230537,0.000833514,0.00016969738,0.00007656034,0.00003889173,0.42520148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9518302,0.00065920624,0.0014820079,0.009419456,0.00007986142,0.00008183968,0.000012263906,0.000037551716,0.03639766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900141,0.0067826337,0.0001841156,0.0008463876,0.0006437424,0.0015290418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992132,0.006885814,0.00026287284,0.00022145487,0.00024058882,0.00025728124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011149864,0.00052596093,0.0006991686,0.0013908083,0.03517186,0.008318779,0.001863267,0.02677352,0.0052831355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016127832,0.0006052439,0.0005823408,0.0012285402,0.045030005,0.012118616,0.0064371787,0.015813885,0.00043608117],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044198157,0.000060092578,0.0006135116,0.000049479575,0.0000061833284,0.0032429066,0.14623459,0.00016842713,0.0002040804,0.83187824,0.012932823,0.0045654816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010720986,0.00010251356,0.0020182037,0.0007841946,0.00004293798,0.0041499864,0.34740892,0.00095499074,0.0023223357,0.28310218,0.35888866,0.0001179205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0239115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052103084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03517186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061144847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069784154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058966815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W264282437","doi":"","title":"Two Valuable Treatises on Civil Procedure","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New York University journal of international law & politics/New York University journal of international law and politics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil procedure; Jury; German; Law; Adversarial system; Adversary; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Procedural law; Convergence (economics); Jury trial; Civil litigation; Sociology; History; Public law; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.025370897373434297,"score_gpt":0.26416211747270807,"score_spread":0.23879122009927378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W264282437","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031742782,0.045427352,0.007353362,0.0440352,0.008205252,0.00004112191,0.00025628993,0.00007860858,0.89142853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13938443,0.05046902,0.0046927035,0.024910513,0.013173817,0.00024361243,0.0004702542,0.00020022335,0.7664554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985317,0.00037558287,0.000046441957,0.00012066491,0.0006280448,0.00029759484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908113,0.00053646666,0.000072590956,0.00008526218,0.00015081457,0.000073756324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008214684,0.0005648047,0.00025163073,0.0020412265,0.0035415948,0.003842301,0.0006301978,0.0026506395,0.018519707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027967335,0.0002087095,0.0005295173,0.0019611258,0.0064206515,0.0024143688,0.0015267419,0.0037679384,0.0035757686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000906931,0.000019554936,0.000080706945,0.000077072225,0.000003991998,0.00010192938,0.0008511967,0.00018405805,0.0001376441,0.76179266,0.20821813,0.028523937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033318659,0.000006900456,0.00033755,0.00016932854,0.0000029803316,0.00006591539,0.00026553794,0.00008312072,0.00010840748,0.037434883,0.961515,0.0000069179364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070642536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012780912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018519707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005158872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030350175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061954558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2673999106","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198794356.013.25","title":"The Return of Legal Realism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Realism; Legal realism; Scholarship; Epistemology; Legal formalism; Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Political science; Legal profession; Comparative law; Black letter law","score_opus":0.031675224015381837,"score_gpt":0.23738781529129024,"score_spread":0.2057125912759084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2673999106","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014575896,0.016568232,0.0081602475,0.32328704,0.0022720608,0.00001727835,0.00005232983,0.000053229996,0.63501376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8679965,0.0089565115,0.0023524722,0.034911677,0.003976083,0.00007889761,0.00007098216,0.0001533734,0.08150352],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921083,0.0047278656,0.00013144249,0.0007698636,0.0016404424,0.0006221526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99009657,0.0073622987,0.0003149426,0.0008942251,0.00085587817,0.00047620127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007421685,0.00032386908,0.00053186895,0.0014145627,0.005301173,0.009742938,0.00112637,0.0051630363,0.011676798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0168431,0.00021576007,0.0004461669,0.0006920809,0.042258248,0.011679374,0.0050863074,0.012074665,0.0012822797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011973495,0.0000019909148,0.000015001158,0.000007724991,5.0139187e-7,0.000007223435,0.00046265114,0.000028712831,0.00000848028,0.99630153,0.0022322573,0.0009327578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005082178,0.000004622136,0.00008011543,0.0001223207,0.0000014718671,0.000019529136,0.0010046625,0.0001773781,0.000042028176,0.9060314,0.092507295,0.0000040059394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048465617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040383595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011676798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009814464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051768264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07120919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W269647062","doi":"","title":"Fixed Date Elections, Parliamentary Dissolutions and the Court","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General election; Political science; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.019420274401163777,"score_gpt":0.28348007827130917,"score_spread":0.2640598038701454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W269647062","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26401225,0.16753131,0.0027326692,0.11401461,0.0024720675,0.00020010518,0.0028075285,0.000046421315,0.4461831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9538183,0.017850474,0.0006463314,0.0039464054,0.00047096514,0.0000613854,0.00029766496,0.00002362068,0.022884816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9795956,0.0048121596,0.000837017,0.0013227098,0.008133021,0.0052995053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9189336,0.044699006,0.006037181,0.0024222613,0.024032803,0.0038751576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025565753,0.0003006072,0.0011805625,0.010630864,0.014115479,0.014861597,0.0032557193,0.0034537371,0.008639374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11169213,0.0006571186,0.00053837907,0.018237779,0.013511553,0.003573289,0.0018550882,0.0052683335,0.00036842225],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017430059,0.000047197816,0.011510985,0.00037394866,0.000108999135,0.00016698806,0.0049897092,0.0014096211,0.00014180176,0.8812848,0.05712754,0.042664196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021106,0.00013280855,0.25043228,0.002060007,0.00049164967,0.00019666672,0.022402642,0.0030362902,0.000656915,0.24883834,0.47123963,0.00030173754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94483423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9798631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10371835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10371835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13845839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75253284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2709722419","doi":"10.29173/alr1431","title":"Reducing the Democratic Deficit: Representation, Diversity and the Canadian Judiciary, or towards a Triple P Judiciary","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Democracy; Politics; Law; Diversity (politics); Statute; Judicial independence; Political science; Representation (politics); Democratic deficit; Judicial review; Judicial discretion; Openness to experience; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.04537311024812908,"score_gpt":0.3028270669859417,"score_spread":0.25745395673781263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2709722419","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07601678,0.10169918,0.00726412,0.32509556,0.0018757617,0.000111358684,0.00027096225,0.00008875368,0.4875775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92859954,0.02145346,0.00213445,0.017043365,0.0006596399,0.000031127387,0.000081878294,0.000028491997,0.029968083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907459,0.0016931228,0.00015777732,0.0005424825,0.0042046863,0.0026560372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99305457,0.0023032892,0.0006629906,0.0003167674,0.00256266,0.0010997782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005693269,0.00025768927,0.00038379253,0.0031539507,0.009241693,0.007112247,0.0019902654,0.0019220655,0.0026985314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014705894,0.0001885643,0.0002758006,0.0045213397,0.018262817,0.002970424,0.0021404598,0.0030258778,0.00021078957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001722441,0.000011427237,0.001788717,0.000100354526,0.000010719417,0.00005753738,0.002140423,0.00058432453,0.00012155504,0.9314326,0.02640151,0.037333615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056126646,0.00007148156,0.042140897,0.0010709435,0.00008946913,0.00012027876,0.010220151,0.0022041027,0.000559085,0.39452487,0.5488477,0.00009491722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93516326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.968453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92958826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.070411734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.123967044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5108753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2710390104","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2991600","title":"The Legislature, the Executive, and the Courts: The Delicate Balance of Power or Who is Running this Country Anyway?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Balance (ability); Executive power; Power (physics); Political science; Law; Separation of powers; Executive summary; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Politics; Psychology; Physics; Finance","score_opus":0.009999889367923941,"score_gpt":0.2666903719893797,"score_spread":0.2566904826214558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2710390104","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057189222,0.01840795,0.0019094023,0.6692972,0.0010513021,0.000007658436,0.00010558732,0.000024400557,0.25200728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9052055,0.007920329,0.00054907484,0.051123645,0.0017941493,0.000023250699,0.00004977032,0.000056766352,0.033277452],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940931,0.0029091644,0.00008997547,0.00045482215,0.0007412383,0.0017116937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914322,0.0037268018,0.0010727693,0.00037033632,0.0010774056,0.0023204614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008175226,0.00025646377,0.0007498151,0.0016231557,0.009920571,0.023754349,0.0015370321,0.007167296,0.018981997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017371334,0.00037999483,0.00031303306,0.0031264843,0.02526177,0.023092432,0.0031958732,0.008513009,0.0022553522],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027044267,0.000039945742,0.0030885392,0.000030100111,0.000019134033,0.000044260287,0.007262544,0.00006699511,0.00006454443,0.9449106,0.028018367,0.016427904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043449814,0.00004231187,0.009417195,0.0006717033,0.000057678255,0.00009480642,0.058122348,0.00026988008,0.0002643395,0.68279934,0.24816488,0.000052012834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019223364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05269775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023754349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004231985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011045132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06350112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2727835676","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2816666","title":"Triaging the Law: Developing the Common Law on the Indian Supreme Court","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Precedent; Common law; Political science","score_opus":0.02784006765148816,"score_gpt":0.28514113394849266,"score_spread":0.2573010662970045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2727835676","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12006618,0.0018337868,0.17333347,0.05465043,0.00056198036,0.00059089466,0.00022162967,0.00033522293,0.64840645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9098891,0.0010157904,0.05488081,0.0028019391,0.00016407126,0.00024128346,0.00011729334,0.00015790379,0.030731818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912281,0.004537216,0.00031625837,0.0009185304,0.0014674015,0.0015325894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894621,0.005204135,0.0006677906,0.0017614699,0.002033351,0.00087122736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012066397,0.0006226181,0.0007297401,0.0044536367,0.013103346,0.017394612,0.0036682126,0.0047431714,0.010571975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028424468,0.0005919512,0.0013294094,0.0043223603,0.024725989,0.01608802,0.009976112,0.009630241,0.0013840154],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035174758,0.0000157946,0.0003119445,0.000009400747,0.0000027678423,0.000059169317,0.0014962145,0.0008908673,0.000054713746,0.98860896,0.0012029491,0.0073436974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009772236,0.000029678513,0.00087835925,0.00015441088,0.00002645912,0.00006095341,0.0050342493,0.0060699196,0.0005682195,0.958462,0.028656634,0.000049302766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0932846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17270017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0932846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014702204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0522977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18548328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2730947195","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2017.1345202","title":"The Achilles heel of the Canadian judiciary: the ethics of judicial appointments in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Dalhousie University","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Impartiality; Legitimacy; Supreme court; Transparency (behavior); Law; Judicial independence; Political science; Judicial review; Representativeness heuristic; Accountability; Judicial activism; Public administration; Psychology","score_opus":0.06405922035223657,"score_gpt":0.34062514127747484,"score_spread":0.27656592092523824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2730947195","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21656032,0.013907973,0.0078856945,0.3236394,0.0007102823,0.00011847434,0.00022914234,0.000069232454,0.4368795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97966945,0.0017571967,0.0013264276,0.004818079,0.00008360111,0.000012615574,0.0000147113105,0.000017520837,0.012300357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.984843,0.0040506925,0.0003275295,0.0009698906,0.005319523,0.0044893543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842026,0.006609416,0.0008282549,0.0003652345,0.0051020905,0.0028925044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0089446185,0.00022254321,0.00041411238,0.0018762248,0.030217582,0.014427618,0.0021588893,0.004406334,0.0027538864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024693228,0.00036392733,0.00026416255,0.00326461,0.025619397,0.0022235443,0.0022691395,0.0054031806,0.00019729203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002627805,0.000017312703,0.00448291,0.00005986001,0.000013087682,0.0003084847,0.021568993,0.00083039934,0.00018779065,0.93492585,0.019797403,0.017781707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009226101,0.000077200406,0.05356518,0.0010593944,0.00014085871,0.00041915628,0.09221474,0.007282164,0.0010564778,0.27484357,0.5688571,0.000391888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9937629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99736184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8153759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1846241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29639518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94572043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2731113842","doi":"","title":"A Matter of Integrity: Rule of Law, the Remuneration Reference, and Access to Justice","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Remuneration; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Rule of law; Law and economics; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.04091267950648587,"score_gpt":0.32021749474789385,"score_spread":0.279304815241408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2731113842","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18940899,0.053516716,0.010425965,0.11964025,0.0006345031,0.00009402928,0.00012542348,0.000030725532,0.6261235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797106,0.0062634824,0.0010467549,0.003289556,0.00023625176,0.000016425338,0.000024219811,0.000014962459,0.009397818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907872,0.0027324473,0.00038752996,0.00076654216,0.0034007288,0.0019254711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9840236,0.009527132,0.0017295572,0.00068448053,0.0031829558,0.000852328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008116516,0.00022663156,0.00058554026,0.0019110434,0.008068309,0.014997953,0.0018588204,0.003942782,0.0023871094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025837645,0.0002821134,0.00026892373,0.00247367,0.08169845,0.0058926465,0.002958236,0.0053949254,0.00021238635],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007609073,0.0000118564785,0.0013312608,0.00004481348,0.0000061479104,0.00013503969,0.014830688,0.00011554084,0.000105317966,0.9741121,0.0012486302,0.0080510415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022647542,0.000060798662,0.026129477,0.001430089,0.00008181916,0.0004772144,0.046873648,0.00057854346,0.0009576012,0.71251476,0.21078144,0.00009194597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.598277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5972277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97486323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025136776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046783615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8081777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2733508293","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199208425.003.0027","title":"Filling the Bench","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nomination; Supreme court; Political science; Law; State supreme court; Scholarship; Politics; State (computer science); Quarter (Canadian coin); Subject (documents); Supreme Court Decisions; History; Library science","score_opus":0.03838012953292725,"score_gpt":0.23250475848669958,"score_spread":0.19412462895377233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2733508293","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020153236,0.0039747893,0.004273803,0.045683324,0.0034053812,0.000076249315,0.00017439798,0.0001818601,0.9220769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25588375,0.0022983425,0.002286607,0.018175706,0.0014240955,0.00008911141,0.00019613719,0.00019891419,0.7194474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979169,0.0009103703,0.00006200503,0.00029937088,0.00044020553,0.000371214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981346,0.0007018277,0.00010249236,0.00020436916,0.00042939812,0.0004272978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027997857,0.00028920913,0.00041046864,0.00071300165,0.009058149,0.00453715,0.0010995389,0.002270111,0.09018811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004999862,0.0001670991,0.00033424897,0.00055397884,0.0059947725,0.0049238726,0.0041556023,0.0035133194,0.02114507],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025980806,0.00010296031,0.0009766171,0.00011091864,0.0000038447984,0.00035885652,0.016478961,0.00009575737,0.0007333754,0.6262836,0.285234,0.06959512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004887897,0.000038804556,0.00043790683,0.00019036587,0.0000022782701,0.00010680696,0.008096292,0.000079399906,0.00022723399,0.028672487,0.96213645,0.0000070434935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032934756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005852188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09018811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019454317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046572867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3017093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2734096431","doi":"","title":"'I Simply Do Not Believe': A Case Study of Credibility Determinations in Canadian Refugee Adjudication","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Adjudication; Credibility; Political science; Refugee law; Immigration; Law; Discretion; Consistency (knowledge bases)","score_opus":0.0398434952935165,"score_gpt":0.3379336883688801,"score_spread":0.2980901930753636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2734096431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88746786,0.004526383,0.0020917899,0.04954845,0.00033159222,0.0004935078,0.00018190959,0.000026902155,0.055331614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9813969,0.0027446025,0.0019061947,0.004684559,0.00005527189,0.000121986166,0.00006568872,0.00002668948,0.008998137],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97637856,0.011902434,0.0006614715,0.0012672449,0.00488283,0.00490754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9736615,0.014946376,0.0017982177,0.0007305664,0.004790863,0.0040723695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0151475,0.0007583545,0.00094833714,0.0032098102,0.07657214,0.009443758,0.0052340208,0.007669383,0.0031634218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04049493,0.000989781,0.00084286754,0.006145194,0.020420393,0.00393372,0.008331058,0.011833216,0.00037347557],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037471935,0.000089635396,0.007335264,0.0001134196,0.000011953244,0.01635309,0.9441978,0.00019547816,0.00032381678,0.015576298,0.0067563276,0.009009515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008657873,0.000029167504,0.0047259885,0.00029712633,0.000017997329,0.0023554591,0.9481708,0.00032285007,0.00021511827,0.001139081,0.042662613,0.000055237302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9385829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9715447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.112172924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.112172924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.110968515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8138753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2734258215","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1265","title":"Book Review: Constitutional Rights After Globilization, by Gavin W. Anderson","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.011362915262418446,"score_gpt":0.2844058235286743,"score_spread":0.2730429082662558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2734258215","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014584446,0.7279728,0.00038844,0.183919,0.056502547,0.000022272572,0.00029190417,0.000052646756,0.030704511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005407454,0.6653776,0.00059113425,0.112454526,0.0610954,0.00010051855,0.00049183005,0.00015018671,0.15433139],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988952,0.0002671854,0.000063142914,0.00017265516,0.0005253794,0.00007651092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957961,0.0024618993,0.0001981427,0.00013889192,0.001204291,0.00020071116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00158325,0.0008905113,0.0011099016,0.0026310533,0.0014742167,0.0045795473,0.0014338524,0.0048406133,0.016591217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009721729,0.0005379059,0.00045202553,0.0044941516,0.002790368,0.0048712413,0.001245208,0.0058497107,0.008351706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028760592,0.0000020945297,0.000013111827,0.000087744134,0.0000016831992,0.0000061164305,0.000011244903,0.000031773638,0.000009670397,0.0037588219,0.9884807,0.0075942385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049728533,0.0000034628522,0.00017354425,0.00040604867,0.0000034887205,0.000032042783,0.000026145077,0.000020972246,0.000016978174,0.0037173473,0.9955902,0.0000048847737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023314646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0472067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023314646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053275665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007960225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05550319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2736401150","doi":"","title":"Conceptual Precision and Parliamentary Systems of Rights: Disambiguating “Dialogue”","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliamentary sovereignty; Sovereignty; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Judicial review; Human rights; Government (linguistics); Parliamentary procedure; Sociology; Politics; Parliament","score_opus":0.03630339283605489,"score_gpt":0.2698295430549229,"score_spread":0.23352615021886802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2736401150","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22388238,0.013259016,0.33913723,0.033501573,0.00065875036,0.000330149,0.00018472108,0.0002178174,0.38882834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98161316,0.00067715923,0.015448399,0.00044143718,0.00014925233,0.00010967155,0.000057222805,0.00004447405,0.0014592393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94052875,0.045820747,0.0023839688,0.0033829755,0.0063510085,0.0015324407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90840304,0.07136662,0.008387447,0.007502194,0.0035127553,0.0008279479],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03879485,0.00054860424,0.0008871838,0.010679853,0.0059715887,0.01769592,0.0021071273,0.0040680566,0.0028946016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09580551,0.0006091752,0.00069996226,0.006943973,0.06411989,0.037569854,0.012377371,0.005249799,0.00034530705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014670307,0.00000567017,0.0003758879,0.000051363208,0.0000043417604,0.000021968639,0.026376743,0.00012916207,0.00012208892,0.96645355,0.00019638165,0.006248238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002987835,0.000031751,0.0017844981,0.00031456284,0.000022399094,0.00018724866,0.019878112,0.0018701978,0.0007353513,0.94335574,0.031753264,0.000037046975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002965278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018887807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03879485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01003252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005132436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2051692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2736829470","doi":"10.29173/alr785","title":"Modernizing Judicial Review of the Exercise of Prerogative Powers in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Justiciability; Judicial review; Law; Statutory law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.030854693897113115,"score_gpt":0.3055984712408487,"score_spread":0.2747437773437356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2736829470","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21487732,0.08269453,0.019005721,0.21750583,0.002548403,0.0011185093,0.0007532782,0.00046589648,0.46103048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9224713,0.020239031,0.010430845,0.0150679285,0.0005844036,0.00010542579,0.00014797061,0.000054979504,0.030898081],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97597593,0.0039405203,0.0012651252,0.0016599619,0.013079356,0.004079129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93994504,0.017290369,0.0025472373,0.001571805,0.03627586,0.0023696548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019389035,0.0002545063,0.0005379956,0.006069494,0.012095968,0.009933623,0.003112581,0.003291033,0.0017732878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058128852,0.00078492734,0.0003351836,0.0058348747,0.007462716,0.0025051653,0.0027357698,0.004004728,0.00018585431],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093052375,0.00009246411,0.016067728,0.0009399023,0.00013284772,0.0007934231,0.016905138,0.004779933,0.0021527037,0.5915481,0.1071438,0.25935093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001363947,0.00011301869,0.10457671,0.0017425338,0.00035307815,0.00032675482,0.006888171,0.007583133,0.0038232089,0.07191502,0.8020894,0.00045247006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9768052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99210596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13480492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13480492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30221415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9780827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737906729","doi":"","title":"The structural conception of rights and judicial balancing","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Rhetoric; Adjudication; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027079022674977072,"score_gpt":0.26357582417521647,"score_spread":0.23649680150023938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737906729","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009942534,0.002806976,0.05742956,0.029034298,0.00047028068,0.000055971206,0.000088622204,0.000074307936,0.9000975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8652762,0.0023622394,0.012329802,0.0057488983,0.0012555862,0.00032610458,0.00010629972,0.00012844149,0.112466395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931162,0.0031044707,0.00026158436,0.0009948441,0.0014806624,0.0010422224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965293,0.0017978566,0.00034190595,0.0005600071,0.00062102114,0.00014985404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059731714,0.00060521445,0.00041898177,0.0018106332,0.005368816,0.010130708,0.0019065711,0.005500897,0.011530976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007678486,0.0004769378,0.00069228635,0.0014491694,0.03465264,0.012417889,0.003915906,0.0057574674,0.0015992464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.7806593e-7,7.940393e-7,0.000005747472,0.0000022175582,2.5974026e-7,0.0000043207847,0.00013340957,0.000036780788,0.000009918588,0.99923944,0.0002529538,0.00031352465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011611248,0.000006123694,0.000049468214,0.00004840498,0.000002879711,0.000021134374,0.00023738631,0.00043137625,0.00012091019,0.9540125,0.045053937,0.000004257224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071765324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060457224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012165115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012165115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070615113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.088264465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2738154899","doi":"","title":"The Partial Commencement of Acts: A Constitutional Criticism of the Lieutenant Governor in Council's \"Line-Item Veto\" Power","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Separation of powers; Supreme court; Veto; Legislation; Legislature; Doctrine; Political science; Democracy; Enumerated powers; Power (physics); Context (archaeology); Compromise; Politics; History","score_opus":0.04802638586106917,"score_gpt":0.27901913326385525,"score_spread":0.23099274740278608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2738154899","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11780345,0.0023852065,0.024225049,0.07477521,0.0008022058,0.00015309051,0.0002624079,0.00019391693,0.7793996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9380948,0.00039932833,0.0040251133,0.009393355,0.0003182134,0.00011237602,0.000054310876,0.000054503686,0.047547966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889819,0.0033304286,0.00053791824,0.0014748016,0.0037433251,0.0019315775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98201376,0.011050261,0.0009223216,0.0027390446,0.0024948714,0.0007796778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009591285,0.0002870281,0.0005457321,0.00075215095,0.011262356,0.009984442,0.0027368744,0.0075118574,0.0021913073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024965301,0.00063660456,0.0004369046,0.0012157967,0.030491952,0.005135317,0.00408435,0.010461629,0.000353715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011183793,0.0000048291313,0.00020707755,0.000009015925,0.0000020768587,0.0000317042,0.003963887,0.00010477609,0.000120074605,0.99081844,0.002214782,0.0025121032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015020049,0.00012645821,0.0066751507,0.00025255402,0.00008219146,0.00025954493,0.007905795,0.002750496,0.0025754615,0.49653557,0.4825686,0.000118006195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22970946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.312114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22970946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016194293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026648851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4567448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2742847932","doi":"","title":"A Revised Theory of Judicial Independence","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial independence; Impartiality; Judicial discretion; Judicial activism; Law; Independence (probability theory); Political science; Politics; Judicial opinion; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.014201713751702842,"score_gpt":0.28338576622201284,"score_spread":0.26918405247031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2742847932","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012450323,0.0065914956,0.08716885,0.03915828,0.0015492195,0.00010158372,0.00040539625,0.000113495815,0.8524614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7910345,0.0091419155,0.036703307,0.011406484,0.004446415,0.00029006528,0.00052061694,0.00020976072,0.14624698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929249,0.0021343238,0.00029345413,0.0011243058,0.0025836637,0.00093928695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99317706,0.002663681,0.00045125204,0.0010817626,0.0021622607,0.00046404722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076635755,0.0006150499,0.0007466424,0.0029187207,0.0040407,0.009038037,0.0027123245,0.004005352,0.01130412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011549703,0.0005019646,0.0011130472,0.0029094755,0.0214058,0.012048125,0.0037370885,0.0077579194,0.0026005805],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015257284,0.0000023335065,0.000039519153,0.000006616013,0.0000011824518,0.000010235099,0.00010769058,0.0001781488,0.000008936436,0.9966613,0.0015377493,0.0014447843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010912806,0.0000071879426,0.00027576243,0.000048067523,0.000004824735,0.00005181645,0.00014367595,0.0010331209,0.000039153823,0.94571775,0.052659508,0.000008172035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0110853575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006343401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01130412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076826806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008547809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055742025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2744308588","doi":"10.4337/cilj.2016.01.08","title":"Book Review","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge International Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Computer science; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.024264275700757253,"score_gpt":0.306161533687821,"score_spread":0.2818972579870638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2744308588","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005399185,0.4752734,0.0016189602,0.03774416,0.054183763,0.00023786475,0.003380379,0.0004929339,0.42652866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0037104809,0.36611488,0.0016763052,0.02508595,0.021083266,0.00018649064,0.004042709,0.0003744454,0.5777256],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998874,0.00015801487,0.00009246279,0.00014355483,0.00063100795,0.000100930745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99701643,0.0008442512,0.00019767467,0.00019510505,0.0013709791,0.00037561747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009793838,0.0006653528,0.0011900205,0.003664518,0.0010744213,0.0056861956,0.0020539595,0.0022103093,0.27878648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006802111,0.00036667468,0.0006956115,0.0053271195,0.00082502444,0.003365029,0.0019339059,0.0026855934,0.19778612],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015997397,0.000018503548,0.00004792261,0.0009977819,0.00000727111,0.000061678315,0.00005868583,0.000054249078,0.00007441201,0.003950399,0.897738,0.096975155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027538106,0.000005014739,0.00006606959,0.00056928804,0.0000033539816,0.00011282975,0.000028564036,0.0000059388894,0.0000134652255,0.00055525865,0.998635,0.0000024729484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00285248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00481315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27878648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021192844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043646237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9326337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2744443919","doi":"10.3138/9781442616615-036","title":"34. Chief Justice of Ontario","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.03234986421228128,"score_gpt":0.22343911489058693,"score_spread":0.19108925067830565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2744443919","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004209604,0.018086681,0.0002805376,0.058288515,0.0035920413,0.00016390698,0.0011384839,0.00010174033,0.91413844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023877487,0.0017883272,0.00016484853,0.013118529,0.00026236568,0.00007571453,0.00008803282,0.000057803743,0.96056706],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99683726,0.0002512811,0.00008261122,0.00031089946,0.00092167436,0.0015962372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844605,0.00030140072,0.00006448393,0.00009111914,0.0007038671,0.0003930021],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014470683,0.00096115476,0.00063713203,0.0016383827,0.030407522,0.0075824927,0.0016661048,0.012769156,0.06063875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043828236,0.001083261,0.0007639935,0.002056839,0.003804319,0.0029105062,0.002573463,0.008093053,0.008022252],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023590279,0.000014283688,0.00037131112,0.000088790264,0.000006471601,0.00017723361,0.0032634195,0.0000430019,0.00009504517,0.17711839,0.81051445,0.00828397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010528171,0.0000051382826,0.0013280456,0.00008522107,0.000009950871,0.000021652111,0.0013526557,0.000021153568,0.000050522118,0.003086775,0.9940141,0.000014322285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96003914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9915673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96003914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053693596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10375554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38957608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2745328100","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3215613","title":"The I·CONnect-Clough Center 2017 Global Review of Constitutional Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Audience measurement; Law; Political science; Center (category theory); Judicial review; Field (mathematics); Constitutional law","score_opus":0.018925989851656597,"score_gpt":0.32019418638042196,"score_spread":0.30126819652876535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2745328100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002164726,0.18211412,0.0007935399,0.266278,0.02530974,0.00005308123,0.0009853129,0.00026050195,0.52204096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.090654634,0.14945728,0.002101706,0.08023521,0.029503709,0.00034969838,0.0017702098,0.0005020643,0.6454256],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777067,0.00077967887,0.00007136282,0.00026745506,0.0008800278,0.00023080774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958117,0.0015635389,0.0002834488,0.0005332094,0.0011901839,0.0006178746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035881395,0.00082595024,0.0009164774,0.0061471337,0.0047666435,0.01231519,0.0011905131,0.007864185,0.06397777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008569481,0.0005723712,0.0004692381,0.0058373422,0.006802385,0.0055437097,0.003636816,0.007189029,0.013006079],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012841951,0.000015480571,0.00029916104,0.00019639247,0.000008755277,0.00002839219,0.00011839097,0.00007496636,0.000051786436,0.124735065,0.8532704,0.021188438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000098618,0.000007946344,0.0007956973,0.00093639217,0.00000931952,0.000020079335,0.0003160045,0.00006080986,0.00006491629,0.01583336,0.98193604,0.000009557701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021039404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05545279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06397777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008771895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018270204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21402699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751794763","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v10n4p139","title":"The Influence of Liberty Concepts on the Legal Classification of Constitutions and Constitutional Governments","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Constitution; Constitutionality; Liberalism; Law; Political science; Sovereignty; Classical liberalism; Government (linguistics); Constitutional law; The Republic; Law and economics; Power (physics); Sociology; Democracy; Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03703501086575625,"score_gpt":0.330836505034972,"score_spread":0.29380149416921575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751794763","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09580372,0.026237672,0.19274798,0.054612696,0.0024459385,0.00031228721,0.0004043641,0.00016380548,0.6272715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93258214,0.004257059,0.049639322,0.0024695862,0.0012327969,0.00045852188,0.00021503138,0.00016276777,0.008982698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96531683,0.02275105,0.0012401715,0.0031558243,0.0061365524,0.0013995355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9244708,0.061054062,0.003908368,0.00427363,0.0051826388,0.0011105392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030293379,0.00052522705,0.0007603423,0.0105059715,0.0050775916,0.011895317,0.001951617,0.0023126637,0.0040994035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059039395,0.0004226213,0.0009819514,0.006639867,0.046760216,0.016640177,0.0047753016,0.007454064,0.0005753247],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028853005,0.0000020955385,0.00011360208,0.000008725492,0.000001058174,0.0000034973023,0.00044623783,0.000044692948,0.000010280485,0.99718386,0.00019588062,0.0019871872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009204524,0.000012246783,0.00070744765,0.00008729812,0.000006752167,0.000024600984,0.0007569385,0.00078713463,0.000096561576,0.9787581,0.018739093,0.000014503525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063862386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004175317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030293379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011630521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047097425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16020858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751879004","doi":"","title":"Droit constitutionnel canadien : principes fondamentaux","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.02691774587964198,"score_gpt":0.26748510183164226,"score_spread":0.24056735595200027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751879004","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015830912,0.034054473,0.020060275,0.099656224,0.0036968356,0.000064401596,0.00027294678,0.00014124457,0.8262227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8463074,0.015920492,0.010053206,0.012505888,0.006760248,0.0004138994,0.00017342571,0.00024732167,0.10761811],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99249905,0.003991679,0.00021092672,0.0009446347,0.0015127156,0.00084105413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929709,0.0049289446,0.00025601225,0.00086642685,0.000718487,0.00025924752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009082007,0.0010117495,0.0014802212,0.003988666,0.009888684,0.01749638,0.0020561903,0.009026885,0.008806189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015344534,0.0006645224,0.00078370085,0.0038758786,0.041911695,0.011013067,0.0042344155,0.015948514,0.0013709428],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000159143,0.000002956726,0.000009733158,0.0000056573354,0.0000012551042,0.000006059655,0.00020070323,0.000028079481,0.00000566892,0.9983041,0.0010166218,0.00041751633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016178983,0.000004212928,0.00014544363,0.00009002183,0.000006328378,0.00004081357,0.00048960507,0.00019716825,0.00006057167,0.9272175,0.071719736,0.000012420934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02742556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026919005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9725744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012417549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077132727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.090096116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752015618","doi":"10.1080/07329113.2017.1371476","title":"Human rights encounter legal pluralism. Normative and empirical approaches, edited by Giselle Corradi, Eva Brems and Mark Goodale","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Pluralism (philosophy); Legal pluralism; Sociology; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Legal research; Legal realism","score_opus":0.03822617743444392,"score_gpt":0.3002624874961289,"score_spread":0.262036310061685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752015618","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017477504,0.69092655,0.0028618842,0.17310311,0.015777986,0.000019842171,0.00013198558,0.000056040506,0.11537479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11860989,0.658472,0.005097658,0.037177373,0.04435952,0.00013618673,0.0003011089,0.00020573253,0.13564056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985134,0.0007383194,0.000047144436,0.0001604167,0.00045145498,0.00008918576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967423,0.0025483863,0.00014023218,0.000113782895,0.00030042854,0.00015495399],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023618,0.0011112939,0.0007057516,0.0026217203,0.002928157,0.008299974,0.0011266286,0.0036259552,0.008484882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055891355,0.0006047287,0.00047066287,0.003536229,0.011400531,0.009709141,0.0025802942,0.006868262,0.0016186445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001711577,0.000035078174,0.00023616193,0.00050752726,0.0000147628525,0.00008055214,0.0046147136,0.00022535751,0.00013418528,0.6590458,0.2968524,0.03823634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010281698,0.000014990873,0.0010529839,0.0012999082,0.000007718752,0.00016275924,0.0038934613,0.00019620682,0.00010211151,0.33314788,0.66008943,0.000022225482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057834233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008666063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008484882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044094035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037936051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031992614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752396609","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4997298","title":"Constituent Power: Political Unity and Constitutional Plurality","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Power (physics); Political science; Law; Philosophy; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.016560237319367857,"score_gpt":0.3065583401623904,"score_spread":0.2899981028430226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752396609","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23237829,0.0019078896,0.042420663,0.024930496,0.0003196979,0.000084365885,0.00011561103,0.000076682874,0.6977663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927583,0.00013146215,0.0015119315,0.00036565596,0.0001327106,0.000038441038,0.000021655134,0.000025484029,0.0050142766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884666,0.0058528883,0.00041834707,0.002082493,0.0017601257,0.0014196249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97333807,0.017499968,0.00202883,0.0033518183,0.0021058533,0.0016754889],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014400042,0.0004299511,0.0013185417,0.0030277485,0.011160374,0.013814885,0.0021075427,0.0042223227,0.008134125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029146109,0.00067616533,0.00069195655,0.0037009162,0.05121538,0.015408376,0.010088063,0.0077304305,0.00070587127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008496481,0.000008497632,0.00017076416,0.0000065625304,0.0000031091038,0.000013968829,0.0022488686,0.00005979775,0.00003396956,0.99601513,0.00021176622,0.0012189333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013447516,0.00000784748,0.00030780246,0.000014217516,0.0000074669388,0.000016554157,0.0011856188,0.00022665715,0.000096880496,0.99414235,0.003975869,0.000005282405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026923416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037836148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014400042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034154414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004931855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0761556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753756812","doi":"10.1017/9781316780237.004","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada’s Transnational Judicial Communication on Human Rights (1982–2014)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Human rights","score_opus":0.04159506145850386,"score_gpt":0.252521625251874,"score_spread":0.21092656379337013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2753756812","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027349368,0.017954016,0.000863709,0.04512701,0.0013966756,0.000050395578,0.001453774,0.00006400553,0.905741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41613644,0.0054556276,0.00068155845,0.011480889,0.00030497444,0.00004914723,0.00043042414,0.0000870421,0.5653739],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966066,0.00026684077,0.00004978294,0.00026153866,0.0016363597,0.0011788578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977714,0.0005441373,0.000052083476,0.00009525304,0.0012722056,0.0002649665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020604676,0.00034899812,0.0003731761,0.0013485112,0.014968936,0.0076114642,0.0013168864,0.0034957295,0.01002992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005966502,0.00033640952,0.00024157137,0.0028543603,0.0055385204,0.0015440197,0.0016071475,0.004623627,0.0009095122],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023616125,0.0000127499825,0.00069171115,0.00006891143,0.000008512668,0.0002541153,0.00882927,0.00027664183,0.00026973354,0.571126,0.38542107,0.0330177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007376149,0.000006259041,0.0065144813,0.00031063886,0.000013803741,0.00006193078,0.0045302357,0.00024065054,0.00043736512,0.013470464,0.97436947,0.000037262995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98386294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9948133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09595857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09595857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1512379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69623137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755083658","doi":"","title":"Theories of law and the constitutional law of the British Empire: an address read by invitation before the Canadian [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books  | UK Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitutional law; Political science; Empire","score_opus":0.014510166711004727,"score_gpt":0.2589852684635834,"score_spread":0.24447510175257867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755083658","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005303598,0.28460374,0.0033754893,0.28553382,0.0047504664,0.000029254184,0.00083673286,0.00015242674,0.4154145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32859087,0.16870242,0.0032276367,0.024098832,0.0048236772,0.000070439295,0.00066445465,0.00020749492,0.46961418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940217,0.00014047691,0.000019835556,0.000052839758,0.0002671408,0.00011758529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991467,0.00037649632,0.000046084573,0.00004965511,0.00029915012,0.00008179486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008058436,0.00041819073,0.00036930607,0.0019459577,0.004550045,0.0053838603,0.00087662134,0.0025049485,0.012480592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023861376,0.00034188724,0.0002461725,0.0034475257,0.011522587,0.0037158998,0.0007771209,0.00311101,0.0015565264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000081490925,0.0000064226842,0.00026792943,0.000136218,0.00000458435,0.000044942903,0.002811999,0.0002487754,0.00009669045,0.58503234,0.39161244,0.019729488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048293596,0.0000046906116,0.0026874696,0.00026735858,0.0000043975215,0.000056667403,0.002801122,0.00022052637,0.00009147554,0.16062903,0.8332169,0.000015406433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.65022016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8050108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34977984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023892632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016371235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70367956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2756138641","doi":"10.1017/s0008423917000981","title":"“You Can't Always Get What You Want”: Regime Politics, the Supreme Court of Canada, and the Harper Government","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Lawmaking; Politics; Political science; Charter; Government (linguistics); Law; Divided government; Salience (neuroscience); Public administration; Law and economics; Legislature; Economics","score_opus":0.020742754642740606,"score_gpt":0.2570803203801835,"score_spread":0.2363375657374429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2756138641","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8922107,0.0012258464,0.0002736013,0.020728985,0.000059965678,0.00002860785,0.00012482793,0.000012027475,0.08533548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994645,0.00024104322,0.000054053045,0.0008129866,0.000010291972,0.000004049562,0.000017823308,0.0000061426344,0.00420864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99347925,0.0012645555,0.000079164914,0.00040608985,0.0022569695,0.0025140485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892777,0.0035485872,0.0012706385,0.00023353586,0.0030717696,0.0025977918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039496683,0.00014696423,0.00042061132,0.001897301,0.026427655,0.009181271,0.0010897263,0.0019773366,0.0025419788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014883651,0.00020994394,0.00020217436,0.0035879777,0.0137981605,0.0014394835,0.0017645941,0.0029202465,0.00015296058],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027860166,0.00021975233,0.2731752,0.000116550415,0.000110657325,0.0015813691,0.29898292,0.0022886656,0.0015053037,0.32111615,0.050604478,0.050020292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033723358,0.00007719405,0.4800055,0.0002332328,0.000073761774,0.00018445519,0.36031932,0.0020485837,0.0006470721,0.01996591,0.13618878,0.00022246572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99008465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8879579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11204211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11919834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8129262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2758441667","doi":"","title":"Parliamentary Timing and Federal Legislation Referred to Courts: Reconsidering C-14","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Legislation; Referral; Law; Legislature; Political science; Supreme court; Judicial review; Referendum; Public administration; Medicine; Family medicine; Politics","score_opus":0.1240364887272668,"score_gpt":0.3389698693085417,"score_spread":0.21493338058127492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2758441667","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15943111,0.10074991,0.009234524,0.18946348,0.0037493713,0.00030242853,0.00051268353,0.000116488154,0.53644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93585974,0.014569716,0.003616828,0.03101922,0.00058682536,0.00007418348,0.00011047487,0.00005632559,0.014106646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9669864,0.011160576,0.002182547,0.0029834525,0.012733598,0.0039533265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92681265,0.045535088,0.0063151093,0.0023562165,0.017549066,0.0014319108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034251522,0.00021720205,0.00075306534,0.003289646,0.010282074,0.010839804,0.0032654419,0.0049597947,0.0025150664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.086849,0.00049274706,0.0006494094,0.006901475,0.0155999465,0.004334656,0.0020882473,0.006940442,0.00031311813],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004382828,0.00002036584,0.005769815,0.0004918875,0.000032274045,0.0003593835,0.026502576,0.0002871963,0.000457454,0.9040931,0.015345684,0.04659633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008656008,0.00016206723,0.07316902,0.005102708,0.00032246474,0.00044616417,0.037754603,0.00086232,0.0021351876,0.059137236,0.8205841,0.00023753896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7531003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8556043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24689972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054532193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1011031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4967075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761510710","doi":"","title":"Constitutional reform: Canadian charter of rights and freedoms","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Charter; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.014001653231869235,"score_gpt":0.2257169929931955,"score_spread":0.21171533976132628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761510710","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033815706,0.03468583,0.0015601659,0.11618584,0.0037489305,0.00013681967,0.0028090633,0.00023908493,0.8372527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17806973,0.03392385,0.0058558597,0.031673223,0.0021035639,0.00025735333,0.0017442167,0.00032720907,0.746045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939029,0.00042818955,0.00012629073,0.0004729753,0.0037773596,0.0012922949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959632,0.00052590965,0.00010174195,0.00027284847,0.0026638487,0.00047236469],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030996688,0.001115655,0.00084302266,0.006282033,0.015333012,0.014729146,0.0032249573,0.0058893515,0.027981797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010966526,0.00090970885,0.00063911645,0.009950666,0.014440793,0.0039732414,0.0021666721,0.007976308,0.001970436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058611,0.000007921231,0.000093454764,0.000046564186,0.0000030645617,0.00001806698,0.0007068522,0.00019019896,0.000033194345,0.6482573,0.33909193,0.011545562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008715189,0.000002147149,0.0010623242,0.00011163563,0.0000071767176,0.000011957928,0.000437043,0.00012848496,0.00005465633,0.030010894,0.9681423,0.000022700062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99530894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99644154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20096244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20096244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.37085018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9267703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761761837","doi":"","title":"The prerogative power in the Australian and Canadian constitutions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Australian Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Power (physics); Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03128897012955045,"score_gpt":0.2930506964353844,"score_spread":0.26176172630583394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761761837","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029342348,0.0070631956,0.00093646895,0.022688983,0.00046159193,0.000044715736,0.0002820599,0.000029746308,0.9391509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7476758,0.0035213507,0.0013458707,0.003987508,0.0003030516,0.000063128944,0.00010389698,0.00007982332,0.24291956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99350315,0.0010287728,0.00013283764,0.00047278777,0.0028936365,0.0019687857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932434,0.0028749874,0.0002378353,0.00039829826,0.0025695695,0.00067578995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044549033,0.00043320426,0.0004854743,0.0036133842,0.020044869,0.016312001,0.0018319375,0.0036928477,0.011577909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015488995,0.00063863856,0.00035890902,0.0054215644,0.03188348,0.00399772,0.0022481487,0.00748103,0.00062939466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007707698,0.0000042059455,0.00014242684,0.000013542019,0.0000016991579,0.000020531568,0.0074245096,0.00007663827,0.000044351826,0.9794561,0.00812384,0.0046843886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002556893,0.00002140796,0.018559666,0.00044161646,0.00004073496,0.00007873938,0.018076364,0.0006443621,0.00031911596,0.24471124,0.7169734,0.00010771114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9582855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9827565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09562618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09562618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1092205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69381976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762692600","doi":"","title":"The Canadian constitution and the courts: the function and scope of judicial review","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Scope (computer science); Law; Political science; Function (biology); Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.013824193743637216,"score_gpt":0.2343405926416996,"score_spread":0.22051639889806238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762692600","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065026353,0.08909777,0.0027224,0.14260457,0.0012257525,0.00006306571,0.00088029914,0.000102554135,0.75680095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6399689,0.10294983,0.0072994707,0.029804735,0.0032066943,0.00016638752,0.00052317453,0.00021260964,0.21586819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98979807,0.002024685,0.00018952962,0.0007203642,0.0051681567,0.0020992672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98374104,0.006974786,0.00055532827,0.00052213256,0.0067946156,0.0014122165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056958445,0.0006259424,0.0006907939,0.00740178,0.014180323,0.019162035,0.002529158,0.0048268647,0.012234456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024328966,0.00064869964,0.00039623698,0.014143535,0.030377246,0.0055102855,0.0016564699,0.0038402993,0.0008369002],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055440287,0.0000049539062,0.0003733728,0.00007618574,0.0000039179245,0.000029251987,0.0015560377,0.00016279871,0.00003798815,0.91626626,0.06819228,0.013291414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015547643,0.000007156005,0.00665617,0.0006943304,0.000024982748,0.000050196537,0.0032727513,0.000512632,0.000102427686,0.23342763,0.7551704,0.00006589049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.981118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9920598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15680622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15680622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3444479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97798526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763979294","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv6cfpf3","title":"Law, Politics and the Judicial Process in Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law; Process (computing); Computer science","score_opus":0.018266559134448596,"score_gpt":0.2019408789088179,"score_spread":0.1836743197743693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763979294","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11812044,0.04815191,0.0017235617,0.11647996,0.00090810505,0.00018023718,0.0012158622,0.00014734469,0.71307266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6512605,0.016839001,0.001489358,0.011643292,0.00021937485,0.00007380732,0.0002521209,0.00010704811,0.31811544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99610186,0.00032164797,0.00008458417,0.0002965631,0.0013128438,0.0018825053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953074,0.0015523033,0.00017635486,0.00009894716,0.001806997,0.001057987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019631267,0.0004888894,0.0006706559,0.0029961374,0.032264486,0.01665951,0.0022708003,0.00615899,0.017039597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010619365,0.0009122782,0.00040687883,0.0071281884,0.011735289,0.0025951997,0.0021844525,0.006072253,0.0007723914],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052885956,0.000050413626,0.003713438,0.00012917808,0.000025814092,0.00036516375,0.006089224,0.0025123598,0.00018066818,0.8413864,0.11498432,0.030510053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000109513836,0.000035420766,0.027957339,0.0006067938,0.0000905642,0.00015525102,0.016424345,0.004663322,0.00061376387,0.13977236,0.8093665,0.00020484695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9981824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23346592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23346592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.42431262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88907087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2764075896","doi":"","title":"Judgments of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.015565338364391062,"score_gpt":0.21943433429358822,"score_spread":0.20386899592919716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2764075896","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04174611,0.019908939,0.0011505696,0.21409443,0.003631748,0.00023165434,0.0026367838,0.00009278284,0.7165069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6192668,0.0070637413,0.0016089961,0.048085608,0.0013462505,0.00016318898,0.0005574179,0.00016411275,0.32174394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98523706,0.001603829,0.00035264608,0.0012262616,0.006515907,0.0050642956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9846294,0.0038219714,0.0002997829,0.00039096878,0.00897335,0.0018845397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071579376,0.00080956606,0.0010868986,0.0044551846,0.047665074,0.018756371,0.004229727,0.013909761,0.018486219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031844225,0.001072577,0.00093618076,0.005480457,0.011182233,0.003336885,0.0024198752,0.013824126,0.0011290531],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006768585,0.000031323525,0.0016583098,0.00007603711,0.000042377695,0.00022861848,0.00421271,0.00055069866,0.0001748953,0.6153554,0.3665984,0.0110036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007752707,0.000026657659,0.01164155,0.0005977858,0.0001925484,0.00005973558,0.01087202,0.0012024589,0.0007684709,0.092609644,0.8817276,0.00022393507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9897649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9961249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15258506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15258506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25331694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9828812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2764092000","doi":"10.1093/icon/moz060","title":"Judging constitutional conventions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Law; Constitutional law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.022608736415300926,"score_gpt":0.3207430179377241,"score_spread":0.29813428152242316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2764092000","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11573143,0.0015811077,0.166962,0.023403978,0.00071423175,0.00038486012,0.00022036591,0.00022598731,0.6907761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9753268,0.00028432754,0.01732124,0.00088527653,0.00016034307,0.00009930827,0.000060664835,0.000052690342,0.005809294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9580575,0.02282997,0.0029190176,0.00478424,0.008904309,0.0025050165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90997696,0.058673482,0.0054290635,0.012099867,0.01202214,0.0017984281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03810113,0.00042043775,0.00084461505,0.004527149,0.0073987297,0.01383422,0.0023726649,0.006145549,0.005335471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09723601,0.00047884948,0.00055820745,0.0022155547,0.056229528,0.01431029,0.0067495406,0.007067298,0.0005338813],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023619293,0.000002383357,0.00032679876,0.000011336687,0.000002612937,0.000025989066,0.0023829222,0.00015904724,0.00008193588,0.994338,0.0005040325,0.0021626083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013198418,0.00001865825,0.00087899796,0.00012885788,0.00001248929,0.000061443265,0.0032539961,0.0015244085,0.0005796357,0.9549104,0.038587704,0.000030197249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009066456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009502641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03810113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006627104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070073446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20150042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765264661","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0011","title":"Courts, Administrative Agencies, and the Constitution","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Statute; Political science; Law; Separation of powers; Constitutional law; Administrative law; Supreme court; Judicial independence; Judicial review; Subject (documents)","score_opus":0.07101320562738322,"score_gpt":0.2701858908716735,"score_spread":0.19917268524429027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765264661","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008562128,0.0122565795,0.0022334922,0.022662414,0.00034232478,0.000040718787,0.00027455567,0.00005529928,0.95357263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6863175,0.016566712,0.0028145036,0.006736661,0.00038880057,0.00009000804,0.000385283,0.000103939245,0.28659663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99725026,0.00045665514,0.000046394834,0.0002422219,0.001170944,0.0008335098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855596,0.00042517067,0.00005308613,0.000078327175,0.00069085235,0.0001965597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014887098,0.0003144961,0.00034560624,0.0024090058,0.01255911,0.010657065,0.0012114876,0.0015637134,0.01326184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002888691,0.00026211308,0.00019243693,0.0036804737,0.02667252,0.0018522171,0.0016919562,0.004045216,0.00078204693],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.9151666e-7,0.0000019772315,0.000059973474,0.000008842782,6.495045e-7,0.000016444365,0.0008644722,0.0001053859,0.000019826102,0.9875687,0.008815186,0.0025376128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068249606,0.0000041268,0.0019267336,0.00034013312,0.000008158676,0.000026777534,0.0040702512,0.0003492191,0.000111630536,0.13188908,0.8612488,0.000018368266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95866627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96504396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95866627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10280352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15961291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74589527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765467927","doi":"","title":"Constitutional politics in Canada after the Charter: liberalism, communitarianism, and systemism","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Communitarianism; Liberalism; Charter; Political science; Politics; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0123894464053049,"score_gpt":0.20857585433627437,"score_spread":0.19618640793096948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765467927","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03047354,0.059648637,0.00090574834,0.15618438,0.0013212127,0.000055191147,0.0011227754,0.00009662885,0.7501918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63705945,0.026710559,0.0011105422,0.016958328,0.0008073531,0.00006183135,0.00049708405,0.00014540799,0.31664944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968924,0.00029767267,0.000039338964,0.00021404948,0.0012761777,0.001280408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976655,0.0006212387,0.000107397864,0.00008711639,0.0009877726,0.0005310345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001562853,0.0005274332,0.00059775024,0.0024714472,0.023103891,0.017075952,0.0018194009,0.003232738,0.012159729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049681584,0.0004392377,0.0004320541,0.008482644,0.02229993,0.0028759022,0.001537666,0.005644274,0.0006425116],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013213538,0.000013066996,0.0008630105,0.000041954274,0.000007280956,0.0000645445,0.006291041,0.0002947999,0.00005832133,0.86727667,0.11341859,0.011657556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002592892,0.000007990048,0.015326702,0.00032630345,0.000027964417,0.000043043085,0.014842878,0.00041007364,0.00017074405,0.09971224,0.86904347,0.00006269724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9966557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21808654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21808654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34124663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90690875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765921322","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0019","title":"Key Doctrines in Canadian Legal Federalism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Legislature; Federalism; Constitution; Jurisdiction; Jurisprudence; Law; Parliament; Separation of powers; Supreme court; Enumerated powers; Politics","score_opus":0.03595536130004879,"score_gpt":0.24553318407754943,"score_spread":0.20957782277750064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765921322","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009725015,0.0069875913,0.0046915514,0.021772822,0.00044102353,0.000053319207,0.00025881594,0.00004642377,0.9560234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87496626,0.00826788,0.007649155,0.0042439452,0.000528501,0.00011610158,0.00026269982,0.000059435446,0.103905946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968436,0.00051222334,0.00008374904,0.00040671462,0.0015154894,0.00063826056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807894,0.00051395927,0.00010519698,0.0001470911,0.0009297108,0.00022508338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002964899,0.00035463914,0.00034383914,0.0040507466,0.012442743,0.0075695817,0.001583869,0.0021690126,0.0072317743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044277324,0.00024477503,0.00034686152,0.004552793,0.030214699,0.0023500724,0.002014876,0.0036279885,0.0006101095],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.6375435e-7,5.93648e-7,0.000019627878,0.0000045632246,2.9899982e-7,0.0000048019147,0.000617928,0.000025967129,0.000009804898,0.9962435,0.001974091,0.0010982703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011510928,0.0000039117563,0.0010658008,0.00016987948,0.000009216087,0.00004449777,0.0016641532,0.00047911043,0.00009493429,0.6627906,0.33364856,0.00001784482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87342286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88818866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12657714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08966646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.070661485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65057874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766403759","doi":"","title":"Canadian constitutional law: cases, notes and materials on the distribution and limitation of legislative powers under [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Calculus (dental); Medicine","score_opus":0.02841954796743159,"score_gpt":0.24763483832405941,"score_spread":0.21921529035662782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766403759","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038492433,0.015852463,0.0016414543,0.034043156,0.0019612242,0.00017120813,0.007749612,0.00028047312,0.9344511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.100182556,0.022331482,0.0049084583,0.015621371,0.00064722693,0.00024483394,0.0038258932,0.00026522184,0.85197294],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958824,0.0002472979,0.000093263174,0.00020960656,0.0028373832,0.0007300926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975241,0.0006648517,0.00008007994,0.00016077225,0.0013177989,0.00025243434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022235287,0.0007565017,0.0003417388,0.00474388,0.012699514,0.00587321,0.00251057,0.003891167,0.0433548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008500083,0.00071922754,0.00046833834,0.010440006,0.007105361,0.00220645,0.0015277591,0.0024938865,0.005440421],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067070077,0.000007631207,0.00017780751,0.00007474993,0.0000022104161,0.000045971137,0.0013313772,0.000100390476,0.00010238573,0.14621797,0.83783543,0.0140974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060758666,0.000002478998,0.0018790889,0.00015898788,0.000006348366,0.000033333494,0.0009591727,0.000071120674,0.00017025512,0.007557076,0.98912734,0.000028679087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9857749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.065406375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.065406375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16682984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4745587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766830284","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0049","title":"Understanding Dialogue Theory","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legislature; Political science; Remedial education; Process (computing); Law; Epistemology; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14240856484932252,"score_gpt":0.2609634641294184,"score_spread":0.11855489928009588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766830284","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009762051,0.011535331,0.057414763,0.035580777,0.00059890037,0.00007360866,0.00015849648,0.00011349779,0.88476264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8901492,0.007265881,0.019991076,0.004363861,0.00042664364,0.00022900008,0.00028998806,0.00015454263,0.077129856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993383,0.004597041,0.00009994301,0.00045318794,0.00089509133,0.0005717019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953431,0.0033289283,0.00015948914,0.0002233496,0.00065605826,0.00028912464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075682853,0.00076182035,0.0006048621,0.0030407521,0.009638093,0.010997233,0.0021698775,0.0033113335,0.012798927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067297905,0.0002383603,0.00056240987,0.002699114,0.03883291,0.00905103,0.0032301531,0.0040188637,0.001284036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016074495,0.0000018465706,0.000023034778,0.00001610854,7.987774e-7,0.000016367614,0.005713995,0.000111468886,0.000010883266,0.9906764,0.0018023058,0.0016250729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061004052,0.000004461573,0.00011255361,0.00019882822,0.0000037806099,0.00004045331,0.009122196,0.00102256,0.000059165708,0.8166248,0.17279638,0.0000085775955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1252873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06739663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1252873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031368837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013990168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24911606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767571406","doi":"10.1111/jels.12161","title":"Triaging the Law: Developing the Common Law on the Supreme Court of India","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisdiction; Political science; Precedent; Original jurisdiction; Majority opinion; Supreme Court Decisions; Law of the case; Court of equity; Common law; Salience (neuroscience); Concurring opinion; Court of record; Citation; Psychology","score_opus":0.18992218102264155,"score_gpt":0.42942458305424364,"score_spread":0.23950240203160209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767571406","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45236441,0.004992972,0.013922881,0.0374859,0.00041326886,0.0002856791,0.00023881973,0.00012927345,0.4901668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98318774,0.0015925991,0.0047425968,0.0011422297,0.00013204596,0.000059174967,0.000110492365,0.000040165723,0.00899293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909758,0.004140627,0.00039156462,0.00081735145,0.0019607327,0.001713904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9750104,0.015625961,0.0022236146,0.0021583608,0.0035976535,0.0013840579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010105906,0.0002762548,0.00035506894,0.0068024625,0.008646671,0.013774626,0.0026380948,0.0017803167,0.005050046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028740847,0.0005458546,0.0005570732,0.0066862702,0.013351015,0.008489685,0.008506041,0.0044868933,0.0007761558],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000147955825,0.00005228837,0.0077677127,0.00005175653,0.000010935222,0.00070270867,0.036402266,0.0008013629,0.00021632599,0.9169059,0.0060079126,0.031066058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033805674,0.00015515968,0.088715814,0.0014905425,0.00014966911,0.0008592316,0.12141341,0.008886137,0.0024116377,0.35210246,0.4235163,0.00026573834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07995362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16018213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07995362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018908402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022943342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15897644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767876364","doi":"10.22609/2.1.2","title":"A Theory of Judicial Constitutional Design","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Constitutional theory; Law; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.07302848898577642,"score_gpt":0.37847590309569507,"score_spread":0.30544741410991866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767876364","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009136549,0.0027300753,0.5060901,0.0153635675,0.0004584584,0.00031541556,0.00018430162,0.00021324525,0.4655082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7585214,0.002007143,0.16908629,0.0036358412,0.0011136193,0.0010583898,0.00022494547,0.00022812033,0.06412426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98736155,0.0070850328,0.00052875583,0.0018046468,0.0022454364,0.00097466534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99010193,0.006452452,0.0005548777,0.0015123151,0.0010982691,0.00028013863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014351227,0.000578251,0.0007828679,0.0023009093,0.004873123,0.009647724,0.0022727046,0.0042680684,0.012043466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018952569,0.000602266,0.0013329579,0.0021224783,0.02520745,0.008263087,0.0028110018,0.0046074223,0.0015093933],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.694679e-7,0.0000014274206,0.000019760448,0.0000059694353,0.0000011263745,0.000005138329,0.000110555804,0.00024605446,0.00001218119,0.99851817,0.0002700548,0.00080887205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013117116,0.000006773021,0.000038289967,0.00002904589,0.0000038242547,0.000018592791,0.0000738074,0.0013309687,0.00005753731,0.9780673,0.020356486,0.000004434491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004377226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037212244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014351227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075533832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064771273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075897515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769900079","doi":"","title":"Constitutional litigation in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.015026791794034853,"score_gpt":0.2214546581736937,"score_spread":0.20642786637965885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769900079","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017826784,0.03797357,0.0006398251,0.15816846,0.0020231414,0.00015100802,0.0022805373,0.00015756923,0.7807791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2790218,0.021705726,0.0014418215,0.043095157,0.00094028655,0.00020437814,0.00083312235,0.00018458042,0.65257317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99084973,0.0006586239,0.00020134314,0.0006669149,0.0033839934,0.0042393934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940799,0.0013073294,0.00018356185,0.00021731589,0.0028547838,0.0013571549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003125046,0.0010023625,0.0011683439,0.0046204957,0.049144153,0.022050478,0.0036295815,0.010754448,0.038441207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01395365,0.0012004834,0.0009330657,0.0093710795,0.010453138,0.003942717,0.0036765172,0.009500644,0.0023350327],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023029093,0.00004553151,0.001288692,0.00010544698,0.000018759445,0.00019854469,0.0026343616,0.00045167943,0.00007429927,0.56875825,0.40480626,0.021595089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032681353,0.000014906453,0.0064401105,0.00039215657,0.000047181442,0.00006976517,0.006385074,0.00054976175,0.00015749513,0.037538122,0.9482773,0.00009548463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99751353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99866927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2448049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2448049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5159632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8759193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770691897","doi":"10.1017/cls.2017.24","title":"Litigating Parentage: Equality Rights, LGBTQ Mobilization and Ontario’s All Families Are Equal Act","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Legislature; Law; Gay rights; Opposition (politics); Lawmaking; Politics","score_opus":0.04021499362328898,"score_gpt":0.3008227465609203,"score_spread":0.2606077529376313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770691897","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38481396,0.003393508,0.0011117773,0.15911007,0.00042859907,0.0001602389,0.00023429008,0.000022035674,0.4507255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9679828,0.0008878842,0.00038123454,0.0061836466,0.000047952904,0.000036988327,0.000024074458,0.0000079149195,0.024447365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942889,0.0013426573,0.00012878737,0.0003747557,0.0015859471,0.0022788544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99182534,0.00379223,0.0007783254,0.00028617147,0.0017042859,0.0016136301],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006006502,0.0001777914,0.00024051142,0.00095818535,0.03467694,0.0062262677,0.0016384162,0.003519177,0.005760457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011874737,0.00028565,0.00021049395,0.0011366112,0.022026964,0.001644664,0.0044052,0.003934729,0.00016549315],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047650894,0.000062801366,0.021651002,0.00010581255,0.000015095574,0.0019372384,0.21285951,0.000285089,0.0008266058,0.6998868,0.044005275,0.018317116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054837168,0.00004766149,0.0743974,0.00074908324,0.000057313628,0.00044862408,0.2914148,0.00056187593,0.0011480511,0.037997857,0.593007,0.000115470175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9839229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9942181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10936133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10936133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18729791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7934757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770753393","doi":"","title":"L'équilibre des pouvoirs législatif et juridictionnel à l'épreuve des systèmes de protection des droits et libertés : étude comparée : États-Unis, Canada, Royaume-Uni","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.04424579164467234,"score_gpt":0.3031103968670378,"score_spread":0.25886460522236543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770753393","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.732595,0.005595043,0.0021439688,0.0071509257,0.000046305107,0.0002439176,0.0016663116,0.00006347098,0.25049502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9670126,0.0018501822,0.0007798243,0.00042537934,0.000011385831,0.00009289075,0.00029785393,0.00002289429,0.029507004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934151,0.000999585,0.00013715887,0.0005513043,0.0026278005,0.0022689963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99452716,0.0013245654,0.00075650605,0.00022472451,0.0021694694,0.0009974991],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003912898,0.00024248102,0.00048546738,0.002396072,0.009417743,0.009668718,0.0014372551,0.0012088146,0.010150035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009025771,0.0003199293,0.00046679663,0.007912301,0.00667498,0.0021492448,0.0036779705,0.0020139492,0.0004763006],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037587242,0.00011659747,0.1593917,0.00058230583,0.00019444748,0.00037113804,0.13924998,0.004707322,0.001491379,0.59641176,0.011410824,0.08569667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008458954,0.000117868105,0.6168634,0.0007357222,0.00020884922,0.0001603772,0.122444436,0.0015857174,0.0012076551,0.011604015,0.24481893,0.0001684648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9759444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9893044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89074075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10925924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1387713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.792735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2772139495","doi":"10.1017/cls.2017.25","title":"Criminal Justice Policy during the Harper Era: Private Member’s Bills, Penal Populism, and the Criminal Code of Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Legislation; Parliament; Criminal justice; Political science; Economic Justice; Law; Government (linguistics); Criminal code; Criminal law; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.028120670500425805,"score_gpt":0.2844385929035023,"score_spread":0.2563179224030765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2772139495","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68621063,0.0039725406,0.00033770697,0.18347763,0.0003877635,0.000074219555,0.0004102921,0.000026721636,0.12510246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97791845,0.00077629933,0.00007329998,0.008278947,0.000058577836,0.000010854572,0.000040858253,0.000012769788,0.012830005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99160755,0.0008080141,0.00009599098,0.0005272693,0.0023136253,0.004647615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98741966,0.0024896034,0.0012495343,0.00023513075,0.0035926902,0.0050133844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003947643,0.00018736477,0.0005120502,0.0020366227,0.029191999,0.011472262,0.001596083,0.0041582217,0.005551039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015246731,0.00045407456,0.00037122384,0.0027832123,0.01446288,0.002603168,0.003849846,0.00687818,0.00021032963],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019267388,0.00027829324,0.12254824,0.00016248181,0.00008909341,0.0013827718,0.09413294,0.0012786657,0.0009284234,0.614667,0.12053889,0.043800592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006493401,0.00010962154,0.4288767,0.00059948704,0.00009376142,0.00022673664,0.13508114,0.002011066,0.0009172743,0.019367313,0.4123038,0.00034808234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99458015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20572911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20572911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22482005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92124164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2772588544","doi":"10.32920/22227784","title":"Shouldn’t the bench be a mirror? The diversity of the Canadian judiciary","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Meritocracy; Compromise; Diversity (politics); Objectivity (philosophy); Political science; Population; Economic Justice; Composition (language); Public administration; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08403152688698305,"score_gpt":0.3017344156809138,"score_spread":0.21770288879393074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2772588544","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78947353,0.0045527993,0.0016839039,0.09379396,0.00018453851,0.00004587214,0.00095968234,0.00003656772,0.109269105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995259,0.0004615268,0.00027158196,0.0012453003,0.000027445809,0.000004642704,0.00008242539,0.000007928476,0.0026402385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.994905,0.00067845674,0.00008726179,0.0004961022,0.002269192,0.0015639516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955741,0.00064864615,0.0004915065,0.00018075165,0.0017156765,0.0013893673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030384692,0.00019364363,0.00037115466,0.0028182983,0.020874692,0.008138123,0.0013335275,0.00086112093,0.004162944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009433839,0.00023173413,0.00020582482,0.0044237804,0.013407929,0.002376519,0.0025221452,0.0016872534,0.00025691555],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021968735,0.000068108064,0.20814419,0.00023937087,0.00016662212,0.00050810166,0.12213334,0.0011879215,0.002419771,0.4452033,0.04887904,0.1708306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035435205,0.00009227553,0.6336281,0.00040764362,0.000083233084,0.00020891076,0.1632703,0.0010473019,0.0010138492,0.02689411,0.17315713,0.00016182431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9845722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99251044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.073884115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.073884115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06798088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5360693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2772796020","doi":"","title":"Constitutional remedies in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.017243281213787265,"score_gpt":0.22483695517957958,"score_spread":0.2075936739657923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2772796020","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021092111,0.027047122,0.0009778976,0.111728564,0.0020872538,0.00017662952,0.0023527401,0.00018922168,0.8343485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38804984,0.01668579,0.0021318952,0.03757524,0.0009137875,0.00021517274,0.00083506433,0.00020853129,0.55338466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884815,0.0008360073,0.00028615916,0.0008214951,0.0047829384,0.0047919624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99318624,0.0013893865,0.00021863841,0.00035699637,0.003553117,0.0012956028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039285496,0.00084849104,0.0012228424,0.004589348,0.03552732,0.01673957,0.003761039,0.008699833,0.02472404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01792928,0.0010456069,0.00090722716,0.008016092,0.01083078,0.0030150397,0.0033159696,0.011135935,0.0013866343],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018556271,0.000037830643,0.00092025223,0.00007088932,0.000017616387,0.00010721162,0.0016520767,0.0005593756,0.00006545096,0.7829123,0.19708575,0.016552713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042544674,0.000018970497,0.007885777,0.0003830489,0.000063394094,0.000058746256,0.0034969007,0.0007611276,0.00021542473,0.05787745,0.92908496,0.00011159059],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99732935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21475887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21475887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4783014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9107684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2774456419","doi":"","title":"Report of proceedings of the preliminary conference and first meeting of the Canadian Bar Association: held at Montreal, September [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Bar (unit); Library science; Political science; Gerontology; Medicine; Geography; Psychology; Meteorology; Computer science","score_opus":0.013489358996336609,"score_gpt":0.2127400474407237,"score_spread":0.1992506884443871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2774456419","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03823336,0.03236156,0.0031712032,0.24072303,0.09071252,0.0030516293,0.11788333,0.0010492122,0.47281426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027417729,0.0038235309,0.0008052215,0.0050336644,0.003162498,0.0003518207,0.0076155164,0.00013290318,0.951657],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855906,0.00010329069,0.00002657748,0.00011134737,0.0007444486,0.00045526246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958318,0.00021826931,0.0001069609,0.000094064475,0.0029365523,0.0008123196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020376183,0.0010306038,0.0005712305,0.0021623776,0.007907554,0.0041277832,0.0022284894,0.003134274,0.11053691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003718494,0.0004332995,0.0005377339,0.0023691063,0.0009490204,0.0013223889,0.0013387225,0.0027433373,0.012888852],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007671362,0.000043529024,0.00064923626,0.0000633636,0.000006564483,0.00008128858,0.00019082923,0.000045726785,0.00017843631,0.0004928437,0.9927757,0.005395926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041133208,0.000050786097,0.028227963,0.000084261694,0.000023462622,0.000028322223,0.0017001375,0.00011600633,0.00053404685,0.00028426285,0.9688664,0.000043308562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.821147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94127965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17885298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016117476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032441758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3697828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2774874957","doi":"","title":"Bobbitt’s Paradise: Canadian Constitutional Interpretation and Public Meaning Originalism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Constitution; Interpretation (philosophy); Original meaning; Constitutional interpretation; Constitutionalism; Original intent; Meaning (existential); Supreme court; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.05075330785836103,"score_gpt":0.3391241005377399,"score_spread":0.2883707926793789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2774874957","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0494848,0.020354213,0.004307319,0.41259876,0.0021197472,0.000040813593,0.0003091669,0.00007822415,0.51070696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9290722,0.005935098,0.0014349192,0.020849526,0.00040840707,0.000016989672,0.000092374634,0.000063326755,0.042127028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932775,0.0018128869,0.00014096384,0.00053560425,0.0029786443,0.0012544538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908476,0.004573178,0.00033376945,0.00041877507,0.0033076364,0.0005189669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059678084,0.00029686763,0.0003997148,0.0025080054,0.020966668,0.011938994,0.0016829186,0.0046130065,0.006141665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014304251,0.00020172454,0.0003653341,0.0049526296,0.03919665,0.0041604554,0.0031314846,0.0075402865,0.00031979542],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011627198,0.0000044499466,0.0002977805,0.000044224962,0.0000042534725,0.00015350632,0.016845182,0.000109587025,0.00007371435,0.9388633,0.03712842,0.0064638783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018278111,0.000010186057,0.0039850334,0.00062277104,0.00002855721,0.00017381427,0.042163704,0.00072823267,0.00060263206,0.24306546,0.7084985,0.00010281413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94033253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9603889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08958781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08958781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07333722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6500081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775927082","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Bar Association submission to the Special Joint Committee of the Senate and of the House of Commons on the Constitution","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; House of Commons; Political science; Law; Commons; Association (psychology); Joint (building); Engineering; Parliament; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019262164670656712,"score_gpt":0.2179704769395563,"score_spread":0.19870831226889957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775927082","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005672771,0.015953882,0.00089011213,0.3546168,0.0721184,0.000600793,0.0054332465,0.0004480612,0.544266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022215521,0.002861086,0.0011830508,0.06988409,0.004868833,0.00016828017,0.0009805979,0.00023112897,0.8976074],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99181783,0.0003941517,0.0002451455,0.00059388555,0.00492301,0.0020260317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992827,0.00077732437,0.00015598621,0.00034876185,0.004415687,0.001475215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004410394,0.000894118,0.0012014329,0.0028428219,0.01755598,0.010527631,0.0026176835,0.017491112,0.030920252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012996479,0.00121569,0.001215529,0.0026871904,0.00426806,0.002139567,0.0023254768,0.013006012,0.006963974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000101930655,0.000009961778,0.0001355954,0.000019508214,0.000004002278,0.00003778604,0.0001447853,0.00003311469,0.00009652777,0.013660665,0.9831465,0.002701351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000079033025,0.0000042905344,0.001835109,0.000053396237,0.000008700485,0.000011662016,0.00033321607,0.000041935615,0.00009400172,0.0012632346,0.9963154,0.000031165542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9264141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97934717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07358593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04517448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17525828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32776535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2778880036","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3090789","title":"Quantitative Analysis of Judicial Voting","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Vector Institute; Royal Ontario Museum; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03462312152891188,"score_gpt":0.35443439987052006,"score_spread":0.31981127834160816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2778880036","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9309467,0.000362391,0.012513195,0.00090848835,0.000059889564,0.00009768795,0.004549946,0.00006360691,0.05049813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99486935,0.00002581512,0.000726006,0.000030507064,0.000023638959,0.00004183224,0.00086857734,0.000009034485,0.0034052455],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99465054,0.0034057193,0.00017832716,0.00047712697,0.00096646784,0.0003218401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9626104,0.027878037,0.003126366,0.0021816208,0.003671768,0.0005318056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004541248,0.00015282967,0.0003167463,0.0027297514,0.00077395665,0.00148907,0.0005694151,0.00043287757,0.012489265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0347708,0.0001348515,0.0002781561,0.0033995414,0.00075262843,0.0009834929,0.0005654045,0.000840458,0.0010604125],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011923071,0.00097464793,0.49265394,0.00061627524,0.0004873433,0.00023087303,0.0073711486,0.009274873,0.0072185234,0.35651645,0.018688839,0.10477478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000075221986,0.00042406798,0.8345476,0.00011113113,0.00013194166,0.0001690538,0.00832555,0.03260322,0.004005043,0.08731078,0.03224139,0.000055000844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027042262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035370253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012489265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010516954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006928949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04178071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2779267178","doi":"","title":"Canada's constitutional law in a nutshell","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitutional law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.014320452577195997,"score_gpt":0.22616477906946994,"score_spread":0.21184432649227394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2779267178","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005744995,0.012749872,0.0032550795,0.14791295,0.0029443786,0.00010822961,0.00524554,0.00042832998,0.82161057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25875762,0.022636881,0.010316921,0.07309741,0.0018114136,0.0002040921,0.00193902,0.0004864254,0.6307502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99505144,0.0003122788,0.000118196025,0.00046339008,0.0030433107,0.0010114312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951515,0.0007074094,0.000106955646,0.00026273436,0.003021915,0.00074943266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018538065,0.00074693706,0.0007908639,0.0057828533,0.013797143,0.021691814,0.0027179206,0.0059505673,0.020486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0090625575,0.00078347157,0.00061087054,0.009324528,0.011144261,0.003964934,0.0016292476,0.0067599537,0.0022851406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000623425,0.000008540458,0.00041048383,0.000057761656,0.000008499166,0.000039909643,0.0007114172,0.0002293601,0.00006097624,0.72366494,0.26389864,0.010903253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000121269495,0.00000421882,0.0017853339,0.00017656955,0.000020171597,0.000035775185,0.0010737516,0.0002432766,0.000095902935,0.0488025,0.9477065,0.0000438183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9946478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99771047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87139124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12860878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3240269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93312633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781079282","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3091717","title":"Past, Present, and Justice in the Exercise of Judicial Responsibility","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Psychology; Criminology","score_opus":0.02676248716564935,"score_gpt":0.3317666565288402,"score_spread":0.30500416936319086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2781079282","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47827163,0.004075764,0.008416134,0.04529294,0.00031318812,0.00002488494,0.00004435416,0.000016574777,0.46354458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99829835,0.00012567427,0.00011536413,0.00026271943,0.00006066284,0.0000031231154,0.0000018340772,0.0000037812842,0.0011284455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9823909,0.01003415,0.00061598775,0.001539882,0.0029167575,0.002502342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96412724,0.024836868,0.0035563835,0.0025450138,0.0028502652,0.002084228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019569,0.00016777843,0.00054445013,0.0017831179,0.010369493,0.011887014,0.001609787,0.004949968,0.004268514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043603115,0.00036994918,0.00044157397,0.0014512312,0.04581499,0.012127011,0.004299039,0.006241147,0.00019263446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047322726,0.000087264554,0.004211846,0.000020017915,0.00001683377,0.00012426569,0.017919945,0.00021960917,0.00014742343,0.970433,0.00073679036,0.006035838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003124203,0.0000665549,0.014835586,0.0001015972,0.00003924781,0.00015849211,0.01780768,0.00075642037,0.0003121825,0.9501148,0.015731115,0.000045122586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064449506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0126961125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047760517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047989935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10349196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781112312","doi":"10.22145/flr.45.4.10","title":"Justiciability, Access to Justice and the Development of Constitutional Law in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Duty; Justiciability; Political science; Government (linguistics); Common law; Context (archaeology); Rule of law; Economic Justice; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.07835296890226545,"score_gpt":0.3644354827945134,"score_spread":0.2860825138922479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2781112312","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17068698,0.009734509,0.002781246,0.06540955,0.00028436992,0.00018308392,0.00052167795,0.00006685206,0.7503317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9686763,0.0028057455,0.0009959999,0.0019469112,0.000037196507,0.000025968113,0.00007778634,0.000018960412,0.025415175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99228257,0.0009450071,0.00018979779,0.00047916672,0.0033235746,0.0027798838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98604923,0.004469835,0.0007378658,0.0005012083,0.005378031,0.0028638688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052098967,0.0002098999,0.0004793027,0.0029290859,0.01967807,0.011350707,0.0017937876,0.0022106562,0.010567792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018155672,0.00031694808,0.00029548455,0.0035657114,0.01695552,0.0024881032,0.0034126395,0.004411246,0.00022057419],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015079331,0.000025454929,0.0042029344,0.00006343957,0.000009260023,0.00020837589,0.0063067833,0.0007011892,0.00014755741,0.96098906,0.011686031,0.015644848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007549439,0.000051454677,0.073938966,0.0007326339,0.00006742664,0.00022753846,0.022257842,0.0033971942,0.0008555439,0.19705041,0.7011257,0.00021970738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.994603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1727167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1727167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29428494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95953137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782663601","doi":"10.7202/1042755ar","title":"La justice constitutionnelle face au mouvement conservateur : la Cour suprême du Canada et le gouvernement Harper (2006-2015)","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.01031204281901675,"score_gpt":0.24128070630020398,"score_spread":0.23096866348118722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782663601","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4796549,0.02729879,0.0016259175,0.124071404,0.00136181,0.00007479298,0.0016402362,0.000074060066,0.36419812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.889702,0.004408752,0.00036296595,0.007934581,0.00009874961,0.000019383833,0.00023408308,0.00005147942,0.09718803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99680567,0.00028233192,0.00003791581,0.00030205506,0.0011617834,0.0014102695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788684,0.00035626278,0.0001289926,0.00005876778,0.00080405007,0.00076510804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016667482,0.00021871035,0.00031116922,0.0009376995,0.020988226,0.009790027,0.0011177751,0.002589958,0.0061102267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004663389,0.0002709812,0.00027232541,0.0022479317,0.010687187,0.0018145432,0.003057106,0.0058032167,0.0003248574],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098549885,0.000046353427,0.020803599,0.00019933916,0.000054755576,0.0014358965,0.1103452,0.0011167597,0.00078289025,0.6447768,0.17627695,0.044062894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017508795,0.00002413747,0.07999784,0.00056407833,0.000052676955,0.00028026992,0.07257236,0.00046132147,0.0007662387,0.012940425,0.83217484,0.00014834735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9907865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99717283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8550537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14494628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20054673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9917411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782846791","doi":"10.11575/prism/5352","title":"Clashing Constitutionalisms in the Bill-of-Rights Era: Strength, Reach and Rights Values","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"BC Cancer Agency; Killam Trusts; University of Calgary","keywords":"Bill of rights; Political science; Human rights; Law","score_opus":0.05776863206415144,"score_gpt":0.37601311329719633,"score_spread":0.3182444812330449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782846791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.083567224,0.0069932635,0.091053896,0.055848837,0.0005149725,0.00011128175,0.000089113055,0.00008160047,0.76173985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810007,0.0008195523,0.0068070227,0.001933072,0.00029932367,0.0000889219,0.00002953689,0.00007274398,0.008949012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9776789,0.01100248,0.0007361683,0.003163834,0.0054432107,0.0019754993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98052764,0.012832556,0.0013387972,0.0026965344,0.0015457633,0.0010587737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020408545,0.00047429558,0.0009276912,0.0022048738,0.007891682,0.018235605,0.001675368,0.0055185906,0.004716424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028527541,0.0006419907,0.0007133085,0.0023961028,0.0801213,0.023717918,0.008819254,0.01264071,0.00047589265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022597371,0.000001980357,0.00005666637,0.0000038985154,0.000001215028,0.000009462796,0.0012409766,0.000033592063,0.000023451554,0.9975362,0.00010649586,0.0009837772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008023824,0.00001038986,0.0002989841,0.000055162374,0.0000048947536,0.00003397127,0.0010520708,0.00018239653,0.000105839215,0.97650516,0.021731699,0.000011462465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007374533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006768507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020408545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011549666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070497594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10793197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783105250","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0021","title":"The Canadian Living Tree Doctrine as a Comparative Model of Evolutionary Constitutional Interpretation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Constitutional interpretation; Constitutional law; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Comparative law; Constitutional economics; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05670185527763862,"score_gpt":0.34854772004902723,"score_spread":0.29184586477138863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783105250","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032391634,0.0014044001,0.023930239,0.014182444,0.00014970398,0.000055959335,0.000237587,0.000056672234,0.9275913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9755887,0.00071591546,0.006014592,0.00072885613,0.00005839065,0.000030276959,0.00007492376,0.000022562283,0.016765777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971206,0.0008502377,0.000043203876,0.0003774541,0.0010837237,0.00052482326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973042,0.0008953218,0.000155348,0.00026880356,0.0010911148,0.00028515622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003082738,0.00030252832,0.00037916724,0.0026352808,0.007333917,0.0058782008,0.0021909694,0.0022954196,0.009488724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053830687,0.00013143625,0.0003455863,0.0030231618,0.022588497,0.0030516814,0.0021196664,0.0025291066,0.00033636513],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.3812326e-7,6.610488e-7,0.000049494123,0.0000026189305,4.973302e-7,0.000012616302,0.00036228137,0.00016378725,0.000013183004,0.9982722,0.0004022662,0.0007194656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010898462,0.000008034565,0.0011826757,0.0000726234,0.00001067972,0.00007230055,0.0016958724,0.0036644067,0.00008482718,0.9172322,0.07594412,0.00002140964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78834456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.834267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21165544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043737188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035172004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42580378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783786080","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0019","title":"Provincializing Constitutions: History, Narrative, and the Disappearance of Canada’s Provincial Constitutions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Scholarship; Constitution; Narrative; Political science; Dualism; Law; Constitutional law; Politics; Monism; Democracy; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.026344527004380475,"score_gpt":0.28402513399984786,"score_spread":0.25768060699546735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783786080","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39989084,0.0101617,0.0030046236,0.09651304,0.00055675907,0.00006269672,0.0011922998,0.00013931222,0.48847872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98194754,0.0012346609,0.00027992344,0.000990962,0.000035223708,0.000009260252,0.00010014597,0.000026963948,0.015375183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99691087,0.0005133847,0.00005914036,0.0002984528,0.0010099745,0.001208138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931132,0.002330243,0.00043767603,0.00038310033,0.002577056,0.0011586781],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029230078,0.00019171186,0.00035302943,0.0023639323,0.029583843,0.013366891,0.0016423528,0.0016843949,0.005653471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009131805,0.00022537314,0.00018031233,0.005052864,0.02862854,0.0025958861,0.0029430478,0.0044083404,0.00015665189],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026865982,0.000012616184,0.0041682757,0.000054593864,0.000007933507,0.00025850182,0.10582924,0.00033538678,0.00020668491,0.8477983,0.024417402,0.016884245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017477072,0.000015642847,0.021893047,0.00033953504,0.000032284308,0.0001594787,0.13844939,0.001220831,0.00065787666,0.053357758,0.78376216,0.000094503324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.991653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7944361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20556387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21208264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9214333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784938838","doi":"10.1177/0734016817753265","title":"Book Review: Seven deadly sins: Constitutional rights and the criminal justice system","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminal Justice Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.04826958772448457,"score_gpt":0.3410484643266069,"score_spread":0.2927788766021223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784938838","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010778348,0.88490677,0.00019277477,0.066868186,0.038558807,0.00001998988,0.00019089153,0.000021632937,0.009133297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0032058868,0.8733608,0.00031027274,0.057097726,0.046313245,0.000070302835,0.00026902324,0.00005520475,0.019317538],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977502,0.0007189873,0.00016742793,0.00021568671,0.0010030224,0.00014460055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867068,0.009028127,0.0007296478,0.00026678148,0.0028379965,0.00043067618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020781306,0.00093350274,0.001904409,0.0056508183,0.001272736,0.005775998,0.0014436843,0.0054227426,0.015328931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014262976,0.00060835795,0.00064174633,0.008168768,0.0033035763,0.0033758616,0.0013278225,0.006531683,0.0050089695],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000086485425,0.0000075174094,0.00004405096,0.0011764856,0.000022325812,0.000016339585,0.000029754909,0.000041878513,0.000029238086,0.0046726097,0.96918285,0.02476826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017106244,0.000013036774,0.00042062378,0.004599811,0.000046397086,0.00011089028,0.00009297937,0.000029030793,0.00003527746,0.007680171,0.9869402,0.000014443349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011234746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033863265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015328931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004229617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009983584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05128044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785581196","doi":"","title":"Canadian Judicial Council","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.044332980212497514,"score_gpt":0.26798919032090884,"score_spread":0.22365621010841133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2785581196","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010303194,0.004870478,0.00036795373,0.023835503,0.0032364186,0.00013911276,0.007483808,0.00037433676,0.9586619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005024465,0.0017164063,0.0004676949,0.0031471981,0.00024728,0.000045812576,0.0014487717,0.00010514422,0.9877972],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992987,0.0002213238,0.00018735812,0.00066679146,0.004596688,0.0013408109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889178,0.0006417944,0.00016074696,0.0006688573,0.0084231375,0.001187629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023670776,0.0011816426,0.0011548217,0.006005437,0.01850281,0.013260948,0.0030585276,0.005810165,0.2721028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011401122,0.0011470349,0.00097256433,0.00643508,0.0025629825,0.0024661382,0.0023554326,0.0051496904,0.058751777],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007749586,0.000011135941,0.0001588229,0.00004163502,0.0000026145615,0.000032954486,0.000094122246,0.0000474369,0.000047879766,0.03408557,0.9534807,0.011989462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002963659,0.0000011587155,0.00049763784,0.000033380173,0.0000028209292,0.000007740429,0.00010208226,0.00003122119,0.000034607918,0.0009746305,0.99830496,0.0000067128008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96725154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98555726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2721028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06294044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22563376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91027457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785691160","doi":"","title":"Documents illustrative of the Canadian Constitution","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01979743399571784,"score_gpt":0.25003316364288447,"score_spread":0.23023572964716663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2785691160","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033202067,0.0047535934,0.0004170346,0.017055675,0.0007462255,0.000053785447,0.0016829728,0.00006623513,0.9719043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14523453,0.007098515,0.0016118702,0.010459103,0.0004966669,0.00011350158,0.0010026012,0.00013803759,0.83384514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814343,0.00012930355,0.000028609667,0.00012396128,0.0010433212,0.0005314632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895084,0.00021672696,0.00003559939,0.00006409492,0.00060170965,0.0001309222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070408755,0.0006958197,0.00032096345,0.0039320686,0.019402783,0.008269869,0.0014077707,0.003004667,0.035152204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034509709,0.0003875038,0.00039209504,0.007736373,0.0064251004,0.0015286374,0.0011808572,0.0041928245,0.0023197378],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010195181,0.0000061222067,0.00017294649,0.000044985783,0.0000023969283,0.00011114483,0.0020813895,0.000119396085,0.000114123846,0.6450527,0.343089,0.009195619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002900685,0.0000010861709,0.0010869497,0.00004737149,0.0000039441193,0.000027982518,0.0010643199,0.000055798842,0.00008325882,0.008959053,0.98865426,0.000012868577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9924935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99651057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08865052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08865052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.123062566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64320755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787560304","doi":"10.7202/1042930ar","title":"La modification et la réforme de la Constitution canadienne","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; McGill University","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022731885394691863,"score_gpt":0.2926727815450801,"score_spread":0.26994089615038824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787560304","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04947534,0.010588717,0.005552672,0.043131843,0.0005550557,0.000116900876,0.00024371319,0.0001088288,0.89022696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75478774,0.0038518438,0.0023627696,0.0049125976,0.000118483345,0.0000626142,0.00012618538,0.000057775895,0.23371999],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99476767,0.0008977788,0.000078255674,0.00055745733,0.0016864912,0.0020123005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876595,0.0001991199,0.00007713463,0.00016949087,0.00054253533,0.00024580522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023464018,0.00032750214,0.00035521114,0.0012213442,0.012937012,0.009090456,0.0011095157,0.0023702686,0.008038483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042043137,0.00025999104,0.00036378976,0.0021235885,0.023307405,0.0019129579,0.0032138254,0.004465579,0.000649019],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010579703,0.0000054565385,0.0004019955,0.000022775312,0.0000047518033,0.000059648246,0.0034109256,0.0003431443,0.00015089748,0.9833182,0.0051902654,0.00708121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000300016,0.000021871801,0.00806727,0.00023696908,0.000023482726,0.000085345644,0.0047632405,0.0006904541,0.0005930468,0.10797376,0.87745,0.00006444981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9420955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9595157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9069831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.093016945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12720765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6748884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788057704","doi":"10.1017/9781108333436","title":"Canada in the World: Comparative Perspectives on the Canadian Constitution","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.07298257503164796,"score_gpt":0.32374955206061506,"score_spread":0.2507669770289671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788057704","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020157333,0.053483307,0.00036353664,0.037040833,0.00084001984,0.000023832346,0.00032689524,0.000026612905,0.8877377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7765662,0.09801598,0.001358494,0.01534587,0.00047653943,0.000087321576,0.00046775053,0.00013394411,0.10754797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99526477,0.0006802216,0.00007019818,0.0002921331,0.0018665945,0.0018260287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971667,0.0009046245,0.0001134425,0.00007661233,0.0012572159,0.00048146784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001952519,0.0006131721,0.00065446296,0.010577204,0.043881502,0.02139479,0.0019513606,0.0032968693,0.015104049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004438925,0.00039625965,0.00049644674,0.027801678,0.021930952,0.0052481913,0.0039018202,0.0046883128,0.00059533044],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000139419235,0.000010074144,0.0007766727,0.00012975592,0.000009413949,0.00022839125,0.029189227,0.00019818691,0.00006139965,0.9144616,0.04062717,0.014294186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000091282645,0.0000066660878,0.005364928,0.00066230044,0.0000359022,0.00011829746,0.07959416,0.00016574068,0.00007559162,0.030071102,0.8838451,0.000051079263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99537224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74466515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.25533488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20917735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.863706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788940108","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i2.5024","title":"THE SILENCING OF QUEER VOICES IN THE LITIGATION OVER TRINITY WESTERN UNIVERSITY’S PROPOSED LAW SCHOOL","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Dissent; Queer theory; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Law; Economic Justice; Gender studies; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.043494779736410506,"score_gpt":0.32876822792399235,"score_spread":0.2852734481875818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788940108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4242581,0.0056459033,0.003948106,0.20025155,0.0011276073,0.000078138815,0.00006262418,0.000056916197,0.36457103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95323944,0.0008914555,0.000523672,0.01946791,0.00016375851,0.00003695787,0.000017222283,0.000027554588,0.025632035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97981596,0.0064494377,0.0006506701,0.0017775019,0.0068989033,0.0044075777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97878253,0.012986572,0.0018578854,0.00076580787,0.004025294,0.0015817693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015435447,0.00025620812,0.00036160057,0.002082953,0.04704622,0.0149600515,0.0025167058,0.009513517,0.004280482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034262598,0.0005911663,0.00039624455,0.0020722048,0.03633029,0.009099567,0.009095694,0.012331756,0.00033347518],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023254026,0.00002545032,0.0040167365,0.0000727228,0.000007916464,0.0013091798,0.40648466,0.00012101717,0.0009926109,0.55569434,0.01704468,0.014207473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023729082,0.000083288935,0.01710076,0.0008313105,0.000055057186,0.0006548845,0.46983594,0.0005552884,0.0036045732,0.044212267,0.46278277,0.0002601733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.60167116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7888679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39832884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05175354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042921048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80134934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789270301","doi":"","title":"Constitutional litigation in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.015026791794034853,"score_gpt":0.2214546581736937,"score_spread":0.20642786637965885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789270301","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017826784,0.03797357,0.0006398251,0.15816846,0.0020231414,0.00015100802,0.0022805373,0.00015756923,0.7807791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2790218,0.021705726,0.0014418215,0.043095157,0.00094028655,0.00020437814,0.00083312235,0.00018458042,0.65257317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99084973,0.0006586239,0.00020134314,0.0006669149,0.0033839934,0.0042393934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940799,0.0013073294,0.00018356185,0.00021731589,0.0028547838,0.0013571549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003125046,0.0010023625,0.0011683439,0.0046204957,0.049144153,0.022050478,0.0036295815,0.010754448,0.038441207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01395365,0.0012004834,0.0009330657,0.0093710795,0.010453138,0.003942717,0.0036765172,0.009500644,0.0023350327],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023029093,0.00004553151,0.001288692,0.00010544698,0.000018759445,0.00019854469,0.0026343616,0.00045167943,0.00007429927,0.56875825,0.40480626,0.021595089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032681353,0.000014906453,0.0064401105,0.00039215657,0.000047181442,0.00006976517,0.006385074,0.00054976175,0.00015749513,0.037538122,0.9482773,0.00009548463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99751353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99866927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2448049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2448049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5159632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8759193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789366024","doi":"","title":"Canadian constitutional documents","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.015226040596533028,"score_gpt":0.2472831503337597,"score_spread":0.23205710973722665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789366024","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00093211094,0.0028600264,0.00026883095,0.007940378,0.00092135515,0.00013077632,0.01643312,0.0003183101,0.9701952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0104930075,0.0029979344,0.0009042067,0.0027550682,0.00019368711,0.00012168208,0.005622454,0.00019579014,0.97671616],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99223083,0.00027807264,0.00019678475,0.0005542148,0.0053689205,0.0013712143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992584,0.00059877225,0.00010837639,0.0005867691,0.0055362857,0.0005857979],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024673091,0.0011996044,0.0008691074,0.010186092,0.018791942,0.014264122,0.003209952,0.0034721752,0.23669863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012463075,0.0012234173,0.0008974749,0.015844654,0.0032280134,0.0026686226,0.0019500813,0.004918166,0.041613292],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073645033,0.0000100185225,0.00013344611,0.000063095744,0.0000029456567,0.000024273158,0.00029815195,0.000056901772,0.000045975376,0.09076331,0.89551693,0.013077646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024986186,9.640487e-7,0.00047333524,0.00004290263,0.0000030396375,0.000007030155,0.0001559642,0.000024221961,0.000044966026,0.0017134323,0.9975229,0.00000876879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9857437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99159384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23669863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11421349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23054494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82868075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789389557","doi":"","title":"The Canadian charter of rights annotated","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.014628410432451487,"score_gpt":0.23323175861119477,"score_spread":0.21860334817874327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789389557","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006879807,0.013624181,0.0012265056,0.018501963,0.006491847,0.00013172193,0.0084166955,0.00034193418,0.9505772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010790738,0.010378812,0.0023153545,0.0030649863,0.000611781,0.000107465414,0.0032204534,0.00028878183,0.9692217],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99506855,0.00027034318,0.00012548528,0.00031791997,0.0034511355,0.0007665091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937582,0.0003797043,0.00008948211,0.0003473356,0.0049868175,0.00043858995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022393037,0.0009688303,0.00095013366,0.010904512,0.014010832,0.0118744075,0.0026443151,0.0027705415,0.0924831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071146516,0.0009172183,0.0006832178,0.021780064,0.005534065,0.0033995125,0.0015468296,0.0042000036,0.015688555],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003839209,0.0000031738018,0.000052262836,0.00003902434,9.404404e-7,0.000012953341,0.00018265526,0.000058760346,0.000022053422,0.100985795,0.8847075,0.0139310025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.853132e-7,5.279242e-7,0.00027200195,0.000065838096,0.0000012351308,0.000006178423,0.00015094352,0.000022820492,0.000015175,0.0025256705,0.9969313,0.000007251455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9859627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9911116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.095697924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.095697924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2197579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6943403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789436971","doi":"","title":"Canadian constitutional law: recent developments: cases, notes and questions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.0252766394452526,"score_gpt":0.2562476930917948,"score_spread":0.2309710536465422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789436971","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0057233567,0.24316223,0.0014554514,0.21611546,0.0049325433,0.00009141445,0.0025571315,0.00019967313,0.5257628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2063505,0.37140265,0.007349198,0.06508627,0.005489849,0.00019342557,0.0023490286,0.00026922743,0.34150988],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933589,0.00038426186,0.0001403793,0.0005224705,0.0043167006,0.0012773232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916313,0.0021291862,0.00025227986,0.00028102446,0.0047038235,0.0010022926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048692953,0.00075880776,0.0007293445,0.007876811,0.013692581,0.018494735,0.0043993127,0.0059816935,0.033406567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01627288,0.00075304706,0.00057106034,0.022471778,0.017012823,0.0059368997,0.0025908425,0.005704014,0.002089331],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010535326,0.000017099934,0.00044054879,0.00031446718,0.000006718473,0.00006695527,0.0015392209,0.00013499035,0.0000854969,0.49668664,0.4604998,0.04019753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007656665,0.0000030108317,0.0025913927,0.00048212218,0.000012434882,0.00004419978,0.0019524775,0.000102931765,0.00007410822,0.018201753,0.976495,0.000032969416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9878434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9950749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84778994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15221004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.276146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9833162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789484898","doi":"","title":"Law, politics and the judicial process in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Process (computing); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Computer science; Sociology; Programming language","score_opus":0.010775525301997914,"score_gpt":0.22584919740994433,"score_spread":0.21507367210794642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789484898","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0432343,0.102700226,0.0015348154,0.1495041,0.0014260646,0.00013286198,0.0021799132,0.00017564597,0.6991121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60785127,0.05060888,0.0021372938,0.01774406,0.000630187,0.0001066876,0.0005530725,0.00015440628,0.32021406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957606,0.00036583786,0.000088407134,0.00028526498,0.0015845561,0.0019152671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955568,0.0012924605,0.00021075812,0.00009571937,0.0018395584,0.0010048103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019086655,0.00054935296,0.0006838399,0.0035780375,0.031271107,0.017648961,0.0022882114,0.004956332,0.017748747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009193706,0.00081150973,0.0004159184,0.010573846,0.013453616,0.0030086965,0.0016551708,0.0052500013,0.0008589141],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025910706,0.000027716835,0.002263379,0.0001734084,0.000016907079,0.00015785478,0.0055956426,0.0011129442,0.00011072712,0.78106767,0.18229356,0.027154252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003804712,0.000015247793,0.021730961,0.00060478464,0.00005492167,0.000079582154,0.012207789,0.001435025,0.00022583907,0.08713918,0.8763479,0.000120709796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99872106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99943537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26630184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.26630184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5180244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8509859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789538959","doi":"","title":"The constitution of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.012057547360161519,"score_gpt":0.21758791245485495,"score_spread":0.20553036509469344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789538959","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033126345,0.012818562,0.0004905871,0.032666087,0.001012669,0.00006460448,0.0023184116,0.00008251857,0.94723403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12517095,0.008718594,0.0013964272,0.014307747,0.00039754278,0.00014351888,0.0010885866,0.00015172109,0.848625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960892,0.00029622467,0.00007815828,0.00039880094,0.001867903,0.001269643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981988,0.00018276702,0.000038547678,0.0001290578,0.0011640886,0.0002867292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013617364,0.0007556101,0.00062125036,0.002402221,0.019327639,0.012881518,0.0017879214,0.0048648706,0.034227654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005699424,0.0007186558,0.00048989843,0.004619334,0.006139128,0.00259428,0.0019485469,0.00561299,0.0031032057],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008762273,0.000010116951,0.00028839003,0.000030984746,0.0000045196552,0.000030451007,0.0007983629,0.00012604511,0.00004500397,0.72865266,0.2612021,0.008802632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000565433,0.0000026039886,0.0011615157,0.00009977136,0.0000066555954,0.00001531864,0.00072331505,0.00006491571,0.00005530772,0.024543503,0.97330236,0.00001897327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9919916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99535733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10401333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10401333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24253678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75467306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789661329","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Constitution and constitutional amendment","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Amendment; Law; Constitutional amendment; Political science; Constitutional law; First amendment; Constitutional interpretation; Supreme court","score_opus":0.01891021911376111,"score_gpt":0.2420640362510535,"score_spread":0.22315381713729238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789661329","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002565427,0.04142633,0.000749167,0.04100457,0.001547636,0.00005221563,0.0011980636,0.000084640444,0.911372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2359052,0.052144043,0.0033279539,0.020537116,0.0017271932,0.00019530988,0.00093118416,0.00021659175,0.6850154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960974,0.00047516287,0.00008560835,0.00032038032,0.0020448307,0.000976768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973788,0.00072192773,0.000080547565,0.0002037631,0.0013427042,0.00027232422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022666156,0.00103968,0.0008214473,0.0061593256,0.01779862,0.015158237,0.0025202865,0.00507395,0.032014724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00832164,0.0008603147,0.0005506796,0.0120702,0.019081395,0.004454565,0.0016165538,0.0054268353,0.002355716],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004238996,0.000005956216,0.00012084008,0.000045162647,0.0000031499742,0.0000232293,0.0009287481,0.00011934435,0.000020391979,0.85255635,0.13842782,0.0077446806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000845307,0.0000026320088,0.0013836046,0.00023263821,0.000011208179,0.000018130075,0.0013951333,0.000104704566,0.000047652684,0.086160436,0.9106076,0.000027838381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99371016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99662006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15535875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15535875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25671956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97966415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789867220","doi":"","title":"Forms and precedents of pleadings and proceedings in the Court of Chancery for Ontario","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.020137979995640952,"score_gpt":0.2455709152886668,"score_spread":0.22543293529302585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789867220","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06738541,0.0022078652,0.0027526123,0.008528155,0.00015043393,0.00025942552,0.0015785402,0.00007812139,0.9170595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71344286,0.0012921909,0.0024288208,0.0006845638,0.000073546675,0.000100491874,0.00048342248,0.000059495134,0.2814345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929415,0.00094136695,0.0004263224,0.000565857,0.002870186,0.0022548002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99171597,0.0037969104,0.00044262712,0.00037593354,0.0028087173,0.00085987034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037836093,0.00032528568,0.00042030244,0.0027517618,0.022240952,0.012825958,0.0017071554,0.0038288734,0.028269963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019365313,0.0012236923,0.0005177758,0.0037672925,0.006413352,0.0031991727,0.0020949666,0.0039079185,0.001638466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005958763,0.000033919867,0.003769854,0.00008079655,0.000013113767,0.0003469478,0.015405248,0.0006895309,0.00033039847,0.91852725,0.046409316,0.014334069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006169583,0.00007555945,0.07303391,0.00060935813,0.00009348624,0.0002839241,0.02995091,0.003437909,0.0010814931,0.15821356,0.73289526,0.00026284845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94961584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9914731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9164273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08357266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08833033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60636497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789909885","doi":"","title":"The laws of government: the legal foundations of Canadian democracy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Democracy; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01678086834921078,"score_gpt":0.23949713164468536,"score_spread":0.2227162632954746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789909885","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038626334,0.025118034,0.0022298396,0.08916946,0.0008089838,0.000033811088,0.00075384986,0.000087285596,0.8779362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5919142,0.049579944,0.0063821916,0.014972536,0.0014468168,0.000108580774,0.0007909827,0.0002390328,0.33456573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974867,0.00032342892,0.000048276208,0.00017708335,0.0013303893,0.0006341792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973488,0.0008415912,0.000120584045,0.00014486792,0.0012484378,0.00029583566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017851245,0.00054609816,0.0003747476,0.003480656,0.010839411,0.01389806,0.0017132383,0.0034254913,0.016156193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009142896,0.00046481015,0.00026978302,0.008447919,0.024015132,0.0046867533,0.0012953719,0.0043092216,0.0011304832],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017452195,0.0000018713009,0.00006986823,0.000016580287,6.569949e-7,0.000011200471,0.0012811405,0.000093960334,0.000011012416,0.95490634,0.038924538,0.004681136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050450913,0.0000019161957,0.0014779338,0.00023647537,0.000005845414,0.000022720096,0.0026928552,0.00027663587,0.00004373433,0.27317163,0.72204477,0.000020441781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98509395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9908444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12476247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12476247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21421976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9052193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789936738","doi":"","title":"Canada's passive revolution: the Charter of Rights and hegemonic politics in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hegemony; Charter; Politics; Political science; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.00815801586929606,"score_gpt":0.1974836622062485,"score_spread":0.18932564633695242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789936738","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06031754,0.012072507,0.0017409048,0.14693709,0.0011370479,0.000071700124,0.0006624443,0.000104045954,0.77695686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7535243,0.006332929,0.00082288164,0.009359636,0.00025580573,0.000037018854,0.0001708427,0.00012811144,0.22936837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966813,0.00030430482,0.000033453667,0.00024319813,0.0012724182,0.0014653469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977647,0.00049394974,0.00008725443,0.0001004323,0.0009146734,0.0006389655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018125001,0.00050182105,0.00052532763,0.0019759971,0.024766019,0.017213285,0.002120177,0.0038456644,0.0127867265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059027756,0.00042927617,0.00035094694,0.004260856,0.020793516,0.0040840236,0.0026218463,0.0058649993,0.00047893482],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002006461,0.000011385945,0.0006028584,0.000037184906,0.000004951716,0.000070929695,0.0078007863,0.00026704435,0.00008131897,0.90499437,0.07345915,0.012649978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003419944,0.000011315119,0.006244308,0.00018845622,0.0000190423,0.00004864231,0.016229171,0.00071435363,0.00025259677,0.08498525,0.89120924,0.0000633874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9971117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7843999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21560009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.38724634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9097927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789956717","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190272654.003.0003","title":"William Schabas, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and International Human Rights Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Human rights; International human rights law; Ex post facto law; Supreme court; Right to property","score_opus":0.024477927705342403,"score_gpt":0.23609288479596288,"score_spread":0.21161495709062048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789956717","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039701643,0.20409794,0.001630239,0.098402865,0.0027280208,0.0000627603,0.00031047544,0.00006217974,0.68873525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18779881,0.15994014,0.0031228422,0.025821976,0.002098008,0.00008983429,0.00028515115,0.00019592444,0.6206473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854726,0.00021462512,0.000025906009,0.00014270308,0.00077568454,0.0002937528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989281,0.00040741081,0.00004687251,0.000041657477,0.00043412065,0.00014164158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011884674,0.0006861757,0.00038627326,0.0027547546,0.015066817,0.008508233,0.0011622598,0.0032875282,0.009510763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002366061,0.00038842793,0.0002036018,0.0054788715,0.021083118,0.0039233174,0.0012676102,0.0049416088,0.0011201228],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048070806,0.0000065538784,0.00018881868,0.000057323712,0.0000019448867,0.00005408967,0.003798258,0.00014252904,0.000045079283,0.77487427,0.20801081,0.012815466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043057908,0.0000030095232,0.0006698164,0.00027817118,0.0000031636355,0.000038324353,0.0026144765,0.00009255555,0.00005274124,0.064877965,0.93134826,0.000017287062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94060975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9762931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059390247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056319617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08417526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40862936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790073433","doi":"","title":"Limiting arbitrary power: the vagueness doctrine in Canadian constitutional law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vagueness; Limiting; Doctrine; Law; Power (physics); Constitutional law; Political science; Law and economics; Computer science; Economics; Physics; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.01717340547040141,"score_gpt":0.24184471734368335,"score_spread":0.22467131187328193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790073433","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017295003,0.015438309,0.026383264,0.07766888,0.0005512089,0.000088157685,0.00045986017,0.000102086095,0.86201316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89120275,0.010717189,0.014305962,0.009746909,0.0006427033,0.000119120596,0.00018604482,0.00014657366,0.07293264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933729,0.0011974578,0.00020107311,0.00061339804,0.0035238196,0.0010913713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924022,0.004225307,0.00026224522,0.0005453008,0.0022283236,0.00033656132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063262987,0.00061620405,0.00067235477,0.003557384,0.012658242,0.0124553,0.0035818086,0.0045610275,0.007519615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02323261,0.0006636262,0.00055506156,0.0069914665,0.047247887,0.0081732385,0.0026664892,0.007693368,0.0004161879],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015886553,0.0000012078951,0.0000389485,0.00001114704,7.6865666e-7,0.000008967745,0.0011677905,0.0001383619,0.000017991913,0.99214935,0.0038964641,0.0025673022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009450319,0.0000031475613,0.0008485621,0.00017876804,0.00001272155,0.000024416537,0.0013189131,0.0009502234,0.00010840452,0.9035625,0.09294287,0.000040005918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94499135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9571029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08452311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08452311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12318101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.613261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790103753","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Bill of Rights and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms: a bibliography","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Bill of rights; Political science; Law; Linguistic rights; Fundamental rights; Civil rights; Human rights; Bibliography; Right to property; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.009699090901198304,"score_gpt":0.21368838880503835,"score_spread":0.20398929790384004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790103753","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00057578465,0.2846877,0.0016346712,0.024199964,0.004490294,0.00012443181,0.0027884396,0.00012476524,0.68137395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028942307,0.4355635,0.00642395,0.016984485,0.0039257193,0.00031628853,0.0033308936,0.00031134306,0.50420153],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968182,0.00017416112,0.000099764824,0.00022550527,0.0022517187,0.0004305771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838006,0.00031812585,0.00005573996,0.00007205943,0.0010205029,0.00015355754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015841315,0.0012892693,0.0009890693,0.012509646,0.007861745,0.009811833,0.0028781893,0.003450953,0.026916277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038272277,0.0007486555,0.00048848835,0.02744004,0.010028846,0.0036320863,0.0014392198,0.0038819755,0.0043827984],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004496061,0.000008106799,0.00006482685,0.00026713815,0.0000026449918,0.000025632315,0.00055479567,0.00013122261,0.00003965258,0.24714477,0.7206856,0.031071063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013756733,6.4882136e-7,0.00031746077,0.00025140078,0.0000019444185,0.000010723972,0.00013387621,0.000016227372,0.000012144726,0.009248187,0.98999816,0.000007882973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9437498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96716547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.085878365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.085878365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16897444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6230941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790232974","doi":"","title":"Commentary on Towards a new Canada: a study by the Committee on the Constitution of the Canadian Bar Association","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Association (psychology); Bar (unit); Political science; Law; History; Geography; Philosophy; Epistemology; Meteorology","score_opus":0.01803941888941992,"score_gpt":0.22786445196633334,"score_spread":0.20982503307691341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790232974","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024913305,0.004873864,0.00009966253,0.9631165,0.010303186,0.00003646674,0.00031215925,0.00001990517,0.01874696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03504316,0.0025185926,0.00023696308,0.9118317,0.0061863936,0.000081263635,0.00011365602,0.000104556755,0.04388377],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9777089,0.003309182,0.0008207353,0.0023193292,0.009501087,0.0063407626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9597649,0.020147713,0.0011257019,0.00061618816,0.013485248,0.0048602647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013432729,0.0009060679,0.0016073058,0.0028292357,0.052424,0.018919626,0.0067849527,0.06515692,0.010374935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045051213,0.001546781,0.0015084378,0.0055853706,0.016044866,0.005494812,0.0041186274,0.06125119,0.0015990956],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026159594,0.000009140157,0.00036070574,0.00006883399,0.000014312964,0.00019898561,0.0062051346,0.00007212605,0.00009534695,0.030176692,0.96125215,0.0015203864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042764434,0.000008444056,0.0036795756,0.0005540154,0.000053988464,0.000066594934,0.01502025,0.00009196044,0.00021954386,0.00445227,0.975652,0.00015853286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95818204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98241055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8863747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1136253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.233227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8244131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790308452","doi":"","title":"Constitutional symposium: Edmonton, Alberta","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.014124158233504295,"score_gpt":0.23480186635732508,"score_spread":0.2206777081238208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790308452","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032712738,0.036828324,0.00054526166,0.020194886,0.0049471557,0.00006658808,0.0032647755,0.00034907862,0.9305326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0042391513,0.0024698775,0.00020302674,0.00039941273,0.00013773893,0.000009897105,0.00025837627,0.000036675407,0.992246],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991811,0.000062954714,0.000017191045,0.00014678648,0.00037144683,0.00022060428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992749,0.000107713706,0.000017112588,0.000052415675,0.0003467716,0.00020109623],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008970646,0.0008883173,0.00052818854,0.0014990738,0.008904261,0.005679842,0.0015151788,0.003497494,0.3419834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012613114,0.0007561183,0.0004365774,0.0029031122,0.0017569655,0.0014082065,0.0015713801,0.0026019325,0.032928366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003879354,0.00002297271,0.00020904398,0.00008591085,0.000004151294,0.000110532426,0.00030040616,0.00018977374,0.00021689465,0.026611632,0.9331034,0.039106496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000830071,0.0000036753015,0.0016741818,0.00010177388,0.0000037388763,0.00001863116,0.00041092202,0.000047738915,0.00006086041,0.0014734177,0.9961894,0.0000073163233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82184017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96749777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3419834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023633061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03857132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9385808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790373006","doi":"","title":"Papers presented at the ... annual mid-winter meeting of the Alberta Branch of the Canadian Bar Association.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bar (unit); Association (psychology); History; Geography; Climatology; Meteorology; Geology; Psychology","score_opus":0.008638578241668351,"score_gpt":0.21487702310969048,"score_spread":0.20623844486802212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790373006","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011934019,0.027347583,0.0005127569,0.0987031,0.07186208,0.0005223269,0.021089265,0.00029627033,0.7677325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0093508875,0.0029439423,0.00018039491,0.0017644544,0.0017008027,0.000029591733,0.0019645288,0.00003954392,0.9820258],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941003,0.000026500495,0.000012824705,0.00006906548,0.0003296988,0.00015192773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801314,0.000074237076,0.000031850956,0.00003270073,0.0013361132,0.0005119677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067082053,0.00068976765,0.0004117301,0.0013233199,0.004827057,0.0027393445,0.0009744217,0.0018745431,0.249732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014761876,0.00026225884,0.0002861979,0.0013504609,0.00059458957,0.0009028272,0.00071459304,0.0014965764,0.03464335],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003015924,0.000017549237,0.00028809908,0.000027684573,0.0000025002257,0.000023786499,0.000082452076,0.000018059005,0.00008074096,0.00042670497,0.99211806,0.0068842634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012026285,0.000012862133,0.011398062,0.000083501734,0.00000674277,0.0000150739415,0.0010552079,0.000045623885,0.00012556212,0.000373861,0.9868596,0.000011820643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67515016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9204458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98704946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012950549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013006166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83543676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790441490","doi":"","title":"Human rights and the courts in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01034025074101,"score_gpt":0.21691195389014975,"score_spread":0.20657170314913975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790441490","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031544343,0.08522338,0.0009775729,0.18698442,0.0016914867,0.00011540631,0.0018246169,0.00012361692,0.6915151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55037785,0.0499712,0.0018447534,0.030164815,0.0008921006,0.00011847165,0.000554942,0.00013467953,0.3659411],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946554,0.00042183258,0.00009851562,0.0003034252,0.0018329864,0.0026878405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945563,0.0014658697,0.00021546488,0.00012629497,0.0021240793,0.0015119717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021642302,0.0005887945,0.0008366701,0.004021059,0.031012323,0.019318992,0.002589973,0.007445895,0.022910539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00887349,0.0008168272,0.00046107377,0.009889156,0.01512307,0.0035729716,0.002141607,0.0073817195,0.0009023989],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018925333,0.000029427976,0.0016396781,0.00012926238,0.000013502565,0.0001798904,0.004407492,0.00060020166,0.000081864055,0.81104934,0.16017906,0.0216714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037289647,0.00001626436,0.016083103,0.00078570104,0.00005103116,0.000089107525,0.011778471,0.00094122457,0.00018430366,0.09569379,0.8742173,0.0001224849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9984952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25170118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.25170118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.48539495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8679206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790522854","doi":"","title":"Judgments of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.015565338364391062,"score_gpt":0.21943433429358822,"score_spread":0.20386899592919716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790522854","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04174611,0.019908939,0.0011505696,0.21409443,0.003631748,0.00023165434,0.0026367838,0.00009278284,0.7165069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6192668,0.0070637413,0.0016089961,0.048085608,0.0013462505,0.00016318898,0.0005574179,0.00016411275,0.32174394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98523706,0.001603829,0.00035264608,0.0012262616,0.006515907,0.0050642956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9846294,0.0038219714,0.0002997829,0.00039096878,0.00897335,0.0018845397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071579376,0.00080956606,0.0010868986,0.0044551846,0.047665074,0.018756371,0.004229727,0.013909761,0.018486219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031844225,0.001072577,0.00093618076,0.005480457,0.011182233,0.003336885,0.0024198752,0.013824126,0.0011290531],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006768585,0.000031323525,0.0016583098,0.00007603711,0.000042377695,0.00022861848,0.00421271,0.00055069866,0.0001748953,0.6153554,0.3665984,0.0110036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007752707,0.000026657659,0.01164155,0.0005977858,0.0001925484,0.00005973558,0.01087202,0.0012024589,0.0007684709,0.092609644,0.8817276,0.00022393507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9897649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9961249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15258506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15258506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25331694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9828812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790527389","doi":"","title":"Canadian constitutionalism: 1791-1991","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Political science; Law; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.018460070886187556,"score_gpt":0.24275998708922708,"score_spread":0.22429991620303952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790527389","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008844491,0.07006958,0.00061207375,0.030772746,0.0017991615,0.00014628844,0.020903748,0.00017095219,0.8666809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1703579,0.042569123,0.0019540042,0.0056211916,0.0006797252,0.00019684462,0.0050416063,0.0002405281,0.7733391],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961874,0.00017760039,0.00010433423,0.0004071211,0.0022639872,0.0008595811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99679524,0.00041551667,0.000120229095,0.0001554873,0.0021491058,0.00036440216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019094234,0.0008371386,0.0007112761,0.008605522,0.016179105,0.009102052,0.0020171432,0.003045283,0.048439264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009467066,0.0008844736,0.00055302057,0.01895933,0.0067697675,0.0030491785,0.0017328043,0.00501944,0.0038988926],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003368346,0.000022126667,0.0012658647,0.00026176687,0.000011998026,0.000093513685,0.004189341,0.00029276503,0.000059837454,0.41048986,0.53796566,0.045313593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048641896,0.0000017980074,0.004640122,0.00015844406,0.0000061647597,0.000019501565,0.00063869794,0.000035956135,0.00004382374,0.0047684573,0.989669,0.000013112388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99380964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99782073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22579695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22579695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24158333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8979658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790575970","doi":"","title":"Seminar on the Constitutional Resolution and Legislative Authority in Canada, held in Ottawa on Friday, January 9, 1981 = [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.02025192265690053,"score_gpt":0.23419885440256072,"score_spread":0.21394693174566018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790575970","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032364484,0.1817699,0.0009522051,0.22509994,0.0043579894,0.00019436954,0.006143989,0.00019717471,0.54892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.267436,0.05155177,0.0013574292,0.0105735455,0.0007278831,0.00011819317,0.0010129667,0.00010789233,0.6671143],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983728,0.00023324744,0.000050047784,0.00012580499,0.000497627,0.000720426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983284,0.00048178562,0.00008327784,0.000052118117,0.0006183908,0.00043601272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014325202,0.00066941336,0.0007522151,0.0021993795,0.02650742,0.0061585903,0.001598515,0.0026678082,0.026163647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045671826,0.0006767984,0.00046663225,0.004908975,0.012023047,0.002440585,0.0014277806,0.0032128862,0.0020520352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085804204,0.000036727462,0.0028382628,0.00025484042,0.000025088388,0.00028852967,0.010646308,0.0005696941,0.00034620968,0.14995399,0.8065682,0.02838627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032235985,0.000015286683,0.03523948,0.00057078653,0.000038479346,0.00006715231,0.013493004,0.00023728049,0.00025874012,0.010264564,0.9397062,0.0000767595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99622154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22792663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22792663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20967133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89549565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790687608","doi":"","title":"Constitutional litigation and social policy: a case study of the Canadian Court Challenges Program","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Constitutional court; Law and economics; Sociology; Constitution","score_opus":0.039457887416006025,"score_gpt":0.288097386304549,"score_spread":0.24863949888854298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790687608","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26054418,0.0037733377,0.0010781332,0.13347228,0.00039903546,0.00034031057,0.00038361968,0.000035902234,0.5999732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87077504,0.0027288848,0.00082005677,0.017512562,0.00014640535,0.00019857025,0.00011152408,0.000040957635,0.10766611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916602,0.0011775428,0.00008563217,0.00040632585,0.002148142,0.004522308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932795,0.003232659,0.00026652685,0.00017805758,0.0013242159,0.0017190954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004854233,0.0006884043,0.0006516914,0.0028616346,0.07749706,0.013462714,0.0043098805,0.014647438,0.010653119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01383463,0.0005701173,0.0008167342,0.005755199,0.01773846,0.0035191302,0.005839565,0.010706891,0.00043863308],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007324471,0.00021706802,0.006807303,0.0001168219,0.000033709293,0.0041212845,0.08397318,0.0014234413,0.00040854918,0.76471347,0.10939356,0.028718295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012458085,0.000096131924,0.039076105,0.0006333789,0.0001559102,0.00089580327,0.35066918,0.002796265,0.0006686472,0.06932894,0.53532535,0.00022975248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98787725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.995742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13306363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13306363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27450502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96544874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791024954","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Reform Task Force of Alberta","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Task force; Task (project management); Political science; Public administration; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.016265304646928727,"score_gpt":0.25385163170135777,"score_spread":0.23758632705442906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791024954","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013246376,0.01535603,0.0025350987,0.15098943,0.009648199,0.0014804101,0.025902912,0.001015707,0.7798258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.043882795,0.0065263393,0.0065981303,0.039582156,0.0012064021,0.00088968175,0.01098184,0.00034056473,0.889992],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.983144,0.0011026829,0.000613497,0.0014054889,0.01019446,0.0035397834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9743706,0.0040535745,0.0005674638,0.0011903596,0.016168816,0.0036491514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016289063,0.00093077664,0.0014158498,0.00626472,0.010529856,0.010245338,0.004281023,0.008331148,0.033462994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02320062,0.0012828539,0.0009677362,0.0049562543,0.0024654719,0.0016082305,0.0034151445,0.009050798,0.004897254],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067758585,0.0000467271,0.001361762,0.00014154273,0.000022302469,0.00011851978,0.0004454411,0.00052048685,0.0003540531,0.074158266,0.89199346,0.030769667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037551345,0.000009593035,0.0055596936,0.00024569288,0.00003392889,0.000018240964,0.0003666732,0.00024093958,0.00031005012,0.0033180688,0.98983043,0.000029263902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9400906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9519898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.064610966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.064610966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34129673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46878755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791039105","doi":"","title":"The interpretation of legislation in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Law; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.010493313198760441,"score_gpt":0.22202251557321415,"score_spread":0.21152920237445372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791039105","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013887629,0.034324303,0.0017378775,0.08485191,0.0012853472,0.00008137841,0.0010504143,0.00011173441,0.86266947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50664675,0.02963603,0.0038408723,0.019624906,0.00063736335,0.00014384897,0.00048055704,0.00023931528,0.43875042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928322,0.0009476854,0.0001730483,0.00055628386,0.0031921612,0.0022986704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99609226,0.001063802,0.0001481058,0.00014950105,0.0020801355,0.00046620736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030827804,0.0007763377,0.000986314,0.0049992804,0.032716054,0.021994937,0.003329142,0.005857428,0.018650284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0100591,0.0010485067,0.00067334,0.013012056,0.022099894,0.0038087636,0.0022253585,0.007602807,0.0010684456],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062330632,0.000008493951,0.00031390254,0.000042315725,0.0000052898718,0.00005864175,0.0038228012,0.00026787576,0.0000329366,0.91300833,0.073177025,0.009256064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014592168,0.000006672198,0.0041259066,0.00036865677,0.000025495809,0.000047917158,0.0073898155,0.00067712495,0.00014237898,0.1172714,0.8698551,0.00007486721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99796367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27386406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.27386406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4489558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84221476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791084497","doi":"","title":"Canadian constitutional law; cases, text and notes on distribution of legislative power","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Law; Constitutional law; Political science; Power (physics); Distribution (mathematics); Mathematics; Physics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.0180831666572255,"score_gpt":0.24571537157615297,"score_spread":0.22763220491892747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791084497","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015612406,0.014658355,0.0007015564,0.011791255,0.0007943658,0.000121967816,0.002856679,0.00015068943,0.96736395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.095050916,0.02655338,0.0032313562,0.008053856,0.00077978877,0.00031412256,0.0022979318,0.00026803976,0.8634506],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948419,0.0003305593,0.00010188999,0.00033646732,0.003433356,0.00095590495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99785846,0.0006585074,0.00008404107,0.00016350858,0.0010346287,0.00020072004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019520434,0.0011027051,0.00062172156,0.009191492,0.016911028,0.010007328,0.0039321505,0.004507599,0.046411514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073699164,0.0011219158,0.00056034426,0.01976895,0.011564705,0.0025382314,0.001494266,0.0038471243,0.004735173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005716647,0.000011430313,0.00014122747,0.00008673912,0.000002985765,0.000056577923,0.0010286655,0.00015969154,0.000054681215,0.38561,0.6004521,0.012390115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005762155,0.0000021409114,0.0013872704,0.00017962416,0.000006182963,0.000031919528,0.00079638744,0.000118952004,0.00008446246,0.021054342,0.9763065,0.000026451191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99147964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.996487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1432463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1432463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17719421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99371284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791295975","doi":"10.29173/alr1296","title":"Liberte, Egalite, Argent: Third Party Election Spending and the Charter","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Political science; Parliament; Democracy; Ambiguity; Election law; Politics","score_opus":0.02474879796624335,"score_gpt":0.29517656153908367,"score_spread":0.2704277635728403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791295975","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03906193,0.007511608,0.0014492183,0.062657855,0.0005954419,0.00002474519,0.00019898143,0.000055106117,0.8884451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8264644,0.0038390378,0.0005591025,0.010822403,0.0006850104,0.00008382344,0.00012875788,0.00010556122,0.15731183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794084,0.000578872,0.00003588084,0.00016875562,0.0005426545,0.00073284877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976521,0.0013594468,0.00026625904,0.0001568629,0.0003127837,0.00025254642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002550495,0.00019482631,0.00028760225,0.0010996604,0.007084518,0.009438683,0.00079129543,0.0026685328,0.008198279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076610153,0.00017177468,0.00024212617,0.002209175,0.0070675416,0.0035032437,0.0024316623,0.005141933,0.00079311786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013271241,0.000008152722,0.00048603298,0.000009790902,0.0000013768063,0.000032384432,0.0009736928,0.00008077302,0.000021934586,0.96958524,0.022913927,0.0058734547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003261321,0.000028226023,0.012648091,0.00020578285,0.000019897117,0.00008684192,0.003277988,0.00059066305,0.00038391052,0.21591166,0.76677954,0.0000347963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18646277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24427466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81353724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01174257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0096634785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37075484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791299629","doi":"","title":"The constitution and the future of Canada.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.006423685823632976,"score_gpt":0.201836617749313,"score_spread":0.19541293192568002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791299629","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005604984,0.075862646,0.0008060435,0.07947709,0.001123537,0.000028824976,0.0016612952,0.00009460129,0.83534104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3230058,0.03897585,0.0015243435,0.018114408,0.000543722,0.000057609806,0.0006746358,0.00013228432,0.6169713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986243,0.00009721402,0.000019492561,0.000087713976,0.0006413783,0.00052979076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990165,0.00013440043,0.000035859888,0.000032490523,0.00056388334,0.00021681459],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006123354,0.00039869602,0.00029504657,0.0015025601,0.013836049,0.007549006,0.0011028143,0.0028594625,0.023063406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030273052,0.00029401266,0.0002487976,0.0031285894,0.00626551,0.0024732936,0.0010106541,0.00306169,0.001547441],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013547884,0.0000093015,0.00081059063,0.00005720744,0.000004436674,0.000073166564,0.0017970604,0.00017842263,0.00006663505,0.5902887,0.3877139,0.018987048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063114044,0.0000032424564,0.0041062026,0.00021354617,0.000009873258,0.00003711283,0.0028454065,0.00015271196,0.00010329255,0.039170846,0.9533334,0.000018285624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9898539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08265404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08265404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15217336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59969985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791322463","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.12496","title":"Courts and Issue Attention in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Homosexuality; Normative; Publication; Democracy; Gay rights; Political science; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.01184551207464701,"score_gpt":0.28542451609320557,"score_spread":0.27357900401855856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791322463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7311484,0.0068535972,0.00046477735,0.037596487,0.00027681887,0.00011176806,0.005760865,0.000101413316,0.21768586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847431,0.0018423458,0.0001974832,0.0014336905,0.00007306481,0.000014271363,0.000642002,0.000019959882,0.011034148],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99508935,0.00047322726,0.00014723417,0.00052457943,0.002560273,0.0012053854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.970295,0.008148233,0.005791663,0.0006552414,0.011301773,0.0038080548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021504438,0.00019647223,0.0002999256,0.006597827,0.0070350077,0.006715533,0.001213422,0.0008914456,0.011902874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025519686,0.00028259715,0.00026836255,0.011245532,0.003090178,0.0013626561,0.0021374025,0.0014632619,0.00040720575],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029373798,0.00026345142,0.59721816,0.00053047127,0.00015859322,0.0017753716,0.065114364,0.0016059749,0.0021576867,0.05152996,0.108999915,0.17035232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034277753,0.000037125847,0.8325609,0.00028491745,0.00006843091,0.00016326948,0.025216173,0.00096637045,0.0006729676,0.0024375527,0.13747123,0.00008676636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99217105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99612087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09859613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09859613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.097053885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7153684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791414840","doi":"","title":"Canada's constitutional crisis: making sense of it all (a background analysis & a look at the future)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.02144210785168073,"score_gpt":0.26035994424447123,"score_spread":0.2389178363927905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791414840","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012480166,0.098032765,0.000536744,0.63030607,0.0043685404,0.00005159412,0.0016557192,0.00008834836,0.25248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53403777,0.12291805,0.002027801,0.13174222,0.0035841423,0.00012798575,0.0012244423,0.00023906693,0.20409854],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995659,0.00035627835,0.000048395872,0.00022343862,0.0014157341,0.0022971632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99557847,0.00067942025,0.00016818475,0.000094112685,0.0020407483,0.0014390221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022888058,0.00070508564,0.00074064505,0.0043513672,0.027222218,0.030284546,0.0027312774,0.007582833,0.014672297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008394687,0.0004658112,0.0005421139,0.013611269,0.015448446,0.008026222,0.0031975613,0.008513706,0.0009252773],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015495321,0.00002356865,0.0017378202,0.00019547681,0.000012843047,0.00020236027,0.00827416,0.00029671736,0.000077397744,0.39561772,0.5645222,0.029024214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009001403,0.000006722972,0.010360977,0.00071751,0.00002377591,0.00006501023,0.031509083,0.00027252603,0.00011975882,0.036101274,0.92074484,0.00006937635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9963104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9977331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7752687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22473133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3977976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89920175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791771367","doi":"","title":"Constitutional reform: the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Constitutional court; Constitution","score_opus":0.0168130720639207,"score_gpt":0.22657525410799623,"score_spread":0.20976218204407554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791771367","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017194081,0.07494998,0.0010674868,0.33502597,0.0027566487,0.000085534695,0.0012171282,0.00008265132,0.5676206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6501668,0.029224347,0.0017380383,0.057925273,0.0022532484,0.00012634028,0.00042322912,0.0001681894,0.25797457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930058,0.0008915615,0.000121770056,0.00067474425,0.0025955003,0.002710582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99452966,0.0014166612,0.00017370825,0.00024578106,0.0025269424,0.0011073125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039692223,0.000600802,0.0008741848,0.0026172502,0.03176471,0.020282269,0.0033088163,0.011415832,0.015117013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017114274,0.0007955052,0.0005411389,0.006142288,0.019089282,0.004928451,0.0024840424,0.0096671935,0.00079312845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016626793,0.0000140906695,0.00054619234,0.00005521094,0.000012188576,0.000074018775,0.0020528275,0.00035674975,0.000050377064,0.8119332,0.17611729,0.0087712025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043783344,0.0000101446885,0.0062285946,0.0005192293,0.00005721807,0.00003901848,0.0048090382,0.0005859326,0.00014560194,0.16573222,0.8217384,0.000090940695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99421126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99708325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17690046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17690046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32529542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9546788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791789151","doi":"","title":"Judicial power and the charter: Canada and the paradox of liberal constitutionalism","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Charter; Political science; Law; Power (physics); Law and economics; Judicial review; Sociology; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.007233095060857148,"score_gpt":0.2024177882020161,"score_spread":0.19518469314115897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791789151","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019669317,0.02867982,0.0017521677,0.23780607,0.0008149883,0.000029139295,0.00041718682,0.000061375526,0.71076995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8629854,0.014900897,0.0013145251,0.028303184,0.0011165414,0.000048256603,0.00015792098,0.000118614655,0.09105471],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959292,0.0006683708,0.00005256266,0.00039421662,0.0015034566,0.001452248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99470043,0.002526239,0.00025838285,0.00028913864,0.0015622521,0.0006635792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003084349,0.00040798864,0.0007474426,0.0022034864,0.018534785,0.019337852,0.0019328659,0.00625548,0.010471824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013686672,0.00043580917,0.00034966087,0.006258409,0.038482342,0.0064676246,0.0024900686,0.008328821,0.0005776352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005696961,0.0000034326401,0.0001169763,0.00001498625,0.0000019271845,0.000017735483,0.0013404635,0.00009842814,0.000014206313,0.97068477,0.024899157,0.0028022674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036240654,0.000004605101,0.002620754,0.00024300216,0.00001719507,0.00003172684,0.0043081027,0.00045317432,0.00008181355,0.6533835,0.33877474,0.00004516972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9704187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9778307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90540224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09459775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14174882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6863579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791856132","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: commentary","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.012194072452736583,"score_gpt":0.2243525603185302,"score_spread":0.21215848786579364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791856132","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008695938,0.017147677,0.00019505655,0.9255954,0.019186089,0.000033658664,0.0006117621,0.000041827807,0.036319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017454645,0.009855037,0.00042982656,0.925161,0.010601647,0.0000903483,0.00015385321,0.0001229474,0.03613067],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9798007,0.0016237423,0.0009025979,0.0021992135,0.009953052,0.0055206157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96912515,0.011974814,0.00093393936,0.00074607565,0.0139051955,0.0033148054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011190904,0.0014773323,0.0023458437,0.0059406864,0.027335824,0.017301433,0.0123983845,0.07465421,0.019890876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04840316,0.0020393624,0.0026720145,0.011701648,0.022439448,0.009237371,0.0062980643,0.053060517,0.002728621],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001633771,0.0000064381156,0.00008655375,0.0001304063,0.00001116392,0.000060227616,0.00092860614,0.000053189273,0.000030160816,0.06117954,0.9346297,0.002867519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057476573,0.000005005411,0.0012157467,0.00086121674,0.00007562693,0.000052065887,0.0026172749,0.00009514598,0.00012724317,0.011937504,0.982842,0.00011368028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.981805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99005204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14950873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14950873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34469503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9864493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791996533","doi":"","title":"Courts and country : the limits of litigation and the social and political life of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01566359509162293,"score_gpt":0.2388463706458857,"score_spread":0.22318277555426277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791996533","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04893604,0.041500654,0.0015558308,0.18853241,0.0007458998,0.00004721781,0.00095099997,0.00009019059,0.7176407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87216294,0.01671554,0.0011506462,0.012399722,0.00032663555,0.000055627792,0.0002142066,0.000116062954,0.09685856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931252,0.00083776994,0.000111770416,0.00048679195,0.0021130054,0.0033254642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99433833,0.0018835645,0.00027811184,0.00021055096,0.0017933934,0.0014961123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025355285,0.00044480778,0.0008446589,0.0036261172,0.03383752,0.02764337,0.0028155325,0.005153679,0.016361026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012502204,0.00068808225,0.0005191472,0.007812543,0.025770746,0.006698706,0.004237376,0.006360993,0.0006754897],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018812569,0.000011849864,0.0019597108,0.000050092025,0.000015600957,0.00011099728,0.01175391,0.00043263444,0.000064851476,0.92668074,0.04463195,0.014268865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000268982,0.000016199267,0.019288206,0.00077352166,0.000076781136,0.000098092336,0.046928365,0.0012426712,0.00017179086,0.30468577,0.6265309,0.00016079695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9953595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9977556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17342378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17342378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34919742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95871127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792013488","doi":"","title":"The Courts and the Canadian constitution: a selection of essays","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Selection (genetic algorithm); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.01220189338478134,"score_gpt":0.22739063859373906,"score_spread":0.21518874520895773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792013488","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037410131,0.28017333,0.0008261279,0.09733763,0.00698775,0.00011793127,0.0017165848,0.00006455583,0.6090351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09170043,0.34417152,0.0027902715,0.034039736,0.009959957,0.00024719763,0.0015174162,0.00020731731,0.51536614],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983872,0.00011576931,0.00003706535,0.0001085549,0.0009965164,0.00035488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979615,0.0005967567,0.00006435143,0.00004320919,0.0011072747,0.00022699668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001336516,0.0010425474,0.0007311782,0.012166325,0.014083186,0.010783926,0.0017875063,0.003932993,0.020127594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056116595,0.00058892753,0.0006697952,0.025439505,0.010667688,0.00300592,0.0014017386,0.0031018932,0.0015455921],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012389779,0.000019210944,0.0002828338,0.00033225477,0.000008381721,0.000076814395,0.002642435,0.00018979862,0.00011919437,0.21388666,0.7571112,0.02531873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067342485,0.0000022085624,0.0028627436,0.00056331477,0.00001194433,0.000027046317,0.0025452299,0.000061754254,0.00004244798,0.014750652,0.97910416,0.000021739852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.970411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9896073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9032084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09679163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10551403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70227575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792065432","doi":"","title":"Essential readings in Canadian constitutional politics","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.013747967056137825,"score_gpt":0.24955647669545558,"score_spread":0.23580850963931776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792065432","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015418933,0.03207432,0.0007960019,0.05883891,0.0032633122,0.000047915688,0.0012043027,0.00013497485,0.90209824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1473313,0.04859742,0.0034443957,0.022471262,0.0036218837,0.00018094735,0.0011378425,0.00034837128,0.7728665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99630165,0.0003613694,0.00008111368,0.0002529426,0.0021246718,0.0008783006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99676055,0.00075229123,0.00006586921,0.00016752334,0.0018898473,0.00036399806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019726353,0.0012606957,0.0008270067,0.01107027,0.024491755,0.017406384,0.002999826,0.0037252377,0.048615165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007689568,0.0007130155,0.00059347023,0.018952854,0.015375004,0.0039539705,0.0017451363,0.0066241417,0.0031640565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059987724,0.000007180795,0.00009057535,0.000060802337,0.0000024536241,0.000029363224,0.001723165,0.0000919788,0.000025402567,0.64391243,0.34065676,0.013393771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034911716,0.0000012213803,0.00061876833,0.00013139263,0.0000052041923,0.000015533915,0.0014144055,0.000071452596,0.000034157816,0.040355895,0.9573351,0.0000133218045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98861897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99320316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20384435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20384435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18655048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9234277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792361819","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Charter of Rights, annotated","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.014768192462779689,"score_gpt":0.23259725121897612,"score_spread":0.21782905875619643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792361819","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00090939,0.060446426,0.0013766756,0.026577875,0.0065151625,0.0001379361,0.012787517,0.00035036978,0.89089864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013858832,0.03036201,0.0026874964,0.0036916605,0.0008244631,0.00012291137,0.004119508,0.0002809611,0.9440522],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784636,0.00012800434,0.00006792498,0.0001643721,0.0014686277,0.00032471304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99732226,0.00022127316,0.00004763385,0.000121763354,0.0020970472,0.00018989125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014307628,0.0010397854,0.00077937864,0.008821535,0.011183989,0.010304813,0.0022154376,0.0025920703,0.06450917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049340953,0.0008425006,0.00043851684,0.02025285,0.006034306,0.0035448035,0.0011131883,0.0031006443,0.0100376215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004309826,0.0000032006321,0.000061182145,0.000059113718,9.688841e-7,0.000014119104,0.000246881,0.00006484143,0.000024131145,0.06322647,0.9225711,0.013723771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014149953,6.44062e-7,0.00054419885,0.000104112776,0.0000014614387,0.000010489757,0.0002475603,0.00002415774,0.00001859055,0.0032857896,0.9957533,0.000008188486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9858456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99445975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0893117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0893117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15662584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6480048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792469002","doi":"","title":"The law of legislative power in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Law; Political science; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.011832098586689304,"score_gpt":0.2205554428286424,"score_spread":0.2087233442419531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792469002","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019436345,0.03472395,0.0014687611,0.079409264,0.0010545934,0.00009478356,0.0017503825,0.00016885492,0.8618932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51678634,0.02297931,0.0026854533,0.0136883715,0.0005091812,0.00013747191,0.00049939565,0.00020621004,0.4425083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941326,0.00046405647,0.00013675033,0.00039096538,0.0027006457,0.0021750564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952478,0.001105255,0.00016253395,0.00014931719,0.0025083343,0.00082673423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00220594,0.00063538377,0.0007716725,0.004389689,0.027465839,0.016995814,0.0025965848,0.004434045,0.0178078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009603935,0.0011752173,0.0004891642,0.010201901,0.012463385,0.0031959158,0.0016981266,0.006045404,0.001027501],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001077256,0.000012867123,0.00071713136,0.000062781786,0.000008627216,0.00005714232,0.0029871985,0.00044865187,0.00005724082,0.876696,0.10645376,0.012487769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023979776,0.000010014692,0.008742079,0.00038599237,0.000035448735,0.000048264603,0.0041603814,0.0008936308,0.00018520496,0.07107039,0.9143532,0.000091494614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9985764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25069046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.25069046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.42426142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8690928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792526048","doi":"","title":"REVISITING THE ROLE OF PRESUMPTIONS OF LEGISLATIVE INTENT IN STATUTORY INTERPRETATION","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Supreme court; Interpretation (philosophy); Statutory law; Law; Legislative intent; Legislature; Consistency (knowledge bases); Substantive law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Judicial interpretation; Reflexivity; Meaning (existential); Presumption; Legislative history; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.045856590037909255,"score_gpt":0.333922354086168,"score_spread":0.28806576404825873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792526048","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049440164,0.02100765,0.38669845,0.14146855,0.0024399334,0.00018125397,0.00025177404,0.0002747354,0.3982374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93770957,0.0041201063,0.036175665,0.013167275,0.0016665166,0.00019214179,0.00008065279,0.00018326535,0.0067047547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9362062,0.027342722,0.004239868,0.005144336,0.023514533,0.0035523346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9224787,0.05684372,0.0038140216,0.007736885,0.008454691,0.0006720176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.061944693,0.00072395214,0.0015561129,0.0041255434,0.008480109,0.01628719,0.008084268,0.0076951846,0.0021736338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06645964,0.0014464877,0.001695666,0.0029733458,0.09653158,0.02132702,0.009422692,0.024976028,0.00067604514],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025498903,0.0000017467372,0.000063949476,0.000026016025,0.0000030711442,0.00002587748,0.0024490145,0.00009929771,0.00004488346,0.99533904,0.00027760855,0.0016669185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015160427,0.000015423302,0.00040205842,0.00043509214,0.000023977276,0.00008587247,0.0015255368,0.00063961634,0.00039153273,0.9636984,0.03273196,0.000035485285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047404967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057702478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95259506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02051105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030016173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32759875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792609118","doi":"","title":"The Charter of Rights and the legalization of politics in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legalization; Charter; Politics; Political science; Law; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.008160842049296506,"score_gpt":0.20574274220281943,"score_spread":0.19758190015352292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792609118","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013473707,0.03524983,0.0022162904,0.08120379,0.0009351326,0.0000729725,0.0010494645,0.00009944429,0.8656994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5190209,0.02702416,0.0033032119,0.012719396,0.0006936548,0.00009225356,0.00039177955,0.00020125735,0.43655336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99626476,0.00038741823,0.00007228285,0.00027098352,0.0017138665,0.0012906541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973984,0.0008278809,0.00012158812,0.00012114679,0.0010440813,0.00048695118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018195861,0.0004741247,0.00060925353,0.0027496533,0.018564839,0.015650516,0.002088192,0.0043704044,0.016954716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065783695,0.00065044384,0.00034073228,0.0068811243,0.021448813,0.0036459453,0.0014968807,0.0058156843,0.0008068102],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043766495,0.0000052153737,0.00023218093,0.00002909543,0.0000022716458,0.00003087846,0.0023539222,0.00021240812,0.000032072774,0.93839115,0.05114178,0.0075645284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013964501,0.000006116006,0.004919756,0.0002831233,0.000012911641,0.000039157763,0.004382267,0.0006255874,0.00014333235,0.13358048,0.8559404,0.00005294661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9968369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81887186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18112816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34293234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9497753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792689572","doi":"","title":"A Selection of human rights laws in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Law; Human rights; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.018931944683196845,"score_gpt":0.25612481088258676,"score_spread":0.23719286619938992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792689572","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0070702652,0.064096704,0.000791029,0.014091328,0.0017112106,0.00024286589,0.011951646,0.00030985,0.89973515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.051294878,0.06458054,0.0019340367,0.0054328064,0.00040313226,0.00012826768,0.004035098,0.00020335203,0.8719879],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986545,0.00004001936,0.00003499173,0.00007011322,0.00080862344,0.00039178997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984068,0.00019450948,0.000045848785,0.000027225738,0.0010105307,0.00031512955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005275093,0.0008494031,0.0005964277,0.011194582,0.009514403,0.007305948,0.0010829974,0.0013079292,0.046288688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018254668,0.00046532485,0.00056886324,0.027492689,0.0023307598,0.0011951227,0.00056366593,0.0013842257,0.004696359],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013587717,0.000022346241,0.00087736733,0.00023451034,0.000007051804,0.00011474148,0.0008178212,0.00023652686,0.00015543248,0.056605138,0.88647443,0.05444117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029094901,0.0000029415469,0.005563612,0.00017789105,0.0000066518405,0.000033183893,0.0008352736,0.000085909436,0.00006043504,0.0016926999,0.99152195,0.000016555618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9920602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9977233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.087280616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.087280616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14351755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6332681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792748244","doi":"","title":"Historical perspectives on law and society in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.012872879426871753,"score_gpt":0.21374554614386754,"score_spread":0.20087266671699577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792748244","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018968472,0.06369819,0.0011954774,0.15450035,0.0024032642,0.000065754335,0.0012674353,0.00012123636,0.7577798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.500782,0.102624,0.0025331653,0.024277203,0.0016609727,0.000121796766,0.0006170603,0.000219742,0.36716405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99562645,0.0003947046,0.00008161814,0.00032934078,0.001628916,0.0019389781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961785,0.00067186495,0.00016330477,0.00007999633,0.0019683847,0.00093799905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018765659,0.0008532164,0.0008189065,0.007988074,0.03971282,0.019256504,0.0033087945,0.004652795,0.029436287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052997833,0.0007897147,0.00058178214,0.020143446,0.024028696,0.004784799,0.0028939352,0.0074088923,0.0012515074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011866314,0.000019377037,0.000699915,0.000085965854,0.000007474739,0.00011412773,0.0077267773,0.0003432879,0.00005407138,0.8834683,0.093321286,0.014147567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009367527,0.000006522037,0.0034812142,0.00035258272,0.000017103659,0.00006141457,0.013748781,0.00036428607,0.000071248796,0.045292057,0.9365444,0.000050979954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99835455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.340432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.340432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4242814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7650054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792825857","doi":"","title":"Report on certain aspects of the Canadian constitution: report to the Senate of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.016024998151706205,"score_gpt":0.23431682335143503,"score_spread":0.2182918251997288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792825857","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06992751,0.029852921,0.0011177845,0.18654387,0.008028807,0.0020148924,0.10811219,0.00070088595,0.5937011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19616538,0.026313359,0.0031542748,0.04212845,0.0012261312,0.0009592099,0.024788067,0.0003753076,0.7048897],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99050456,0.000299081,0.00023944858,0.0002709393,0.006097036,0.002588959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875695,0.00084209396,0.0002901288,0.00024426333,0.009190085,0.001864009],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004465528,0.0006948652,0.000613042,0.005059199,0.014663805,0.0065029445,0.0027473334,0.005948136,0.016272888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011122847,0.0008701912,0.0010891617,0.008246203,0.0020404167,0.0012640004,0.002149803,0.0054468256,0.0018146167],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000811848,0.000044189695,0.006624894,0.00019248639,0.000045860314,0.0001856066,0.0010987105,0.00040133335,0.00038227043,0.019087557,0.9587627,0.013093225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050314018,0.000019757294,0.06472003,0.00021630949,0.00008930915,0.000053562773,0.0027139818,0.00025755385,0.0007195994,0.0010594988,0.92996234,0.00013766736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9977068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99871075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08029523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08029523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.410861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58258533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792851599","doi":"","title":"Judicial Adaptation to the Uncertainties of Constitutional Transformation: the Canadian Supreme Court and Courts of Appeal [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.024553875644505705,"score_gpt":0.24064638132707977,"score_spread":0.21609250568257407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792851599","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01959609,0.04944894,0.0043048775,0.2851372,0.0014768996,0.000041636235,0.0004358489,0.00008397511,0.63947445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89295816,0.018155862,0.0022594447,0.017523594,0.00096795865,0.000030824267,0.00012965516,0.000071344184,0.06790317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99418133,0.0011366445,0.00007685763,0.00035035715,0.0025183135,0.0017363722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964101,0.0011622191,0.00015730927,0.00017636918,0.0017490198,0.00034504777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046037934,0.00048562704,0.0004668029,0.0020021456,0.017687725,0.0130641805,0.0026832127,0.0048409854,0.007860291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0137363635,0.00033792676,0.00045663357,0.0037942987,0.036478862,0.004540173,0.0026740094,0.004929981,0.00048262128],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007059286,0.00000480365,0.00041576274,0.000030404623,0.0000055580604,0.00009678553,0.0052288864,0.0004734624,0.00006578506,0.9175758,0.0652759,0.010819743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012462273,0.0000058801793,0.0066491673,0.00028197403,0.000020799327,0.00008102464,0.014662758,0.00092438806,0.00014501305,0.5481932,0.4289541,0.000069258334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9773161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9888377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10053522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10053522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18159206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7294375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793037611","doi":"","title":"The Constitution of Canada and its amendment: a selected bibliography","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Amendment; Bibliography; Law; Political science; First amendment; Supreme court","score_opus":0.010789396172482674,"score_gpt":0.21379660803455355,"score_spread":0.20300721186207088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793037611","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015364416,0.52730566,0.0009573226,0.019011628,0.0035069957,0.000094808966,0.0038739762,0.00010350928,0.44360974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.051070437,0.6123411,0.0029651201,0.012343468,0.0026593227,0.00019152589,0.0037244603,0.00021366257,0.31449082],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822396,0.00009931076,0.00006890756,0.00013944715,0.001143712,0.0003246696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986331,0.0002775825,0.000047611335,0.000046263965,0.0008898638,0.00010550291],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084497523,0.00098038,0.0010475786,0.014178364,0.009498737,0.01003992,0.00237696,0.002904022,0.019469488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003270639,0.0006773146,0.00050509727,0.0412499,0.006810837,0.0022474632,0.0009914695,0.0025296346,0.0022244598],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009173689,0.000019957348,0.00025877112,0.0009197605,0.000011338154,0.00006530154,0.0012010407,0.00043176295,0.0000822986,0.16528083,0.78132397,0.050395824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026892667,0.0000010404221,0.0010539234,0.0007069973,0.000008144825,0.000018589593,0.0004249643,0.000037350284,0.000029272855,0.005803175,0.99190253,0.000011401574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9824835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9929993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.117322214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.117322214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18416217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8512362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793037671","doi":"10.29173/alr2452","title":"The Unbroken Supremacy of the Canadian Constitution","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; State (computer science); Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Political science; White supremacy; Sociology; Mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.027442162155786824,"score_gpt":0.30934088775324664,"score_spread":0.2818987255974598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793037671","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08720428,0.024009291,0.0033007155,0.117829815,0.0010134939,0.000058738788,0.0003680362,0.000056641256,0.766159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.929126,0.008514567,0.0015177511,0.009334966,0.00027032258,0.000027905187,0.00008702347,0.000031385356,0.05108996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934088,0.0010003716,0.00012437602,0.00077437056,0.0030396883,0.0016524929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99610883,0.0011783437,0.00018283191,0.00023002723,0.0019318442,0.00036805565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045696,0.00023293543,0.00032682347,0.0019096197,0.01331259,0.008466733,0.00095484266,0.0019975605,0.0036802813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008861817,0.0003228173,0.00018757462,0.0021793782,0.022835625,0.0029838118,0.0019990886,0.0042861765,0.0002731966],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006405429,0.0000025450718,0.0003323925,0.00002078766,0.0000020355487,0.000047240068,0.0043458496,0.00010070108,0.00015137564,0.9788399,0.0073784385,0.008772288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030168309,0.000024096124,0.014795125,0.00041058374,0.000034110013,0.000112689086,0.007891963,0.00058618514,0.0005678543,0.15088682,0.82458484,0.00007551582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9713746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98038304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08222314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08222314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15368444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5965734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793196969","doi":"","title":"Making the case: the right to publicly-funded legal representation in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Political science; Public relations; Public administration; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03167765921511646,"score_gpt":0.27662567300074437,"score_spread":0.24494801378562792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793196969","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02867984,0.018210016,0.0018675965,0.3537519,0.0016406028,0.0001261816,0.001109172,0.00011107254,0.59450364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62783474,0.01132227,0.0025747083,0.051080994,0.0006622253,0.00014483329,0.0003677444,0.00017583357,0.30583668],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885223,0.0010458789,0.0002122031,0.0007837088,0.004269259,0.005166671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929195,0.0019316706,0.00026262927,0.00028674846,0.0026466222,0.0019528206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005463408,0.0006018643,0.00088733766,0.0018711033,0.03343451,0.023322556,0.0040649553,0.013689349,0.017095147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017304765,0.0008610898,0.0006032507,0.004273959,0.017563986,0.0050408826,0.004138234,0.012732631,0.0010830443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020363443,0.000029609933,0.0011951157,0.00007265633,0.000015468762,0.00017864382,0.006003144,0.0004942303,0.00010018115,0.78583926,0.1874864,0.01856488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052581447,0.000017275479,0.0094891945,0.00063626166,0.00006246423,0.000108952954,0.014109204,0.0013863405,0.00032305808,0.13048077,0.84311813,0.00021572686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99673283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16787799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16787799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4812465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96514356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793217254","doi":"","title":"Canadian constitutional history and law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitutional law; Political science","score_opus":0.018394988321984995,"score_gpt":0.22012845102206197,"score_spread":0.20173346270007697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793217254","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017610257,0.027271906,0.00047589224,0.029028524,0.0014445892,0.000050801213,0.002632902,0.00015640847,0.9371779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.075256556,0.023533616,0.001705075,0.0064905994,0.00067740487,0.000094822106,0.0012533438,0.00019520223,0.8907935],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99678576,0.00026629207,0.0000741602,0.00031868828,0.0018127133,0.0007424547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99762446,0.00034770698,0.000059586095,0.000190892,0.0014714173,0.0003058821],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015778653,0.00096823554,0.000773776,0.006929556,0.019896138,0.0138744945,0.002298171,0.0032535922,0.09245177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006930111,0.0009191052,0.00054878276,0.012278616,0.009530624,0.0034445354,0.0019205359,0.004248577,0.006802559],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006060886,0.0000080645705,0.00024937672,0.00007703407,0.0000042032807,0.000027079772,0.0009157864,0.000117864314,0.000027503935,0.45744368,0.5201393,0.020984026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023934795,0.0000013389249,0.0007860366,0.00009485431,0.0000049276755,0.000009455775,0.00060829817,0.000048618927,0.000027099608,0.016538152,0.9818673,0.000011411662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9926092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99662495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14823663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14823663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23836766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98792475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793301790","doi":"","title":"The law of the Canadian constitution","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01673740854964344,"score_gpt":0.23218839346987977,"score_spread":0.21545098492023632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793301790","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020003063,0.013117804,0.0008980487,0.02304467,0.00082541635,0.000038675036,0.00077432516,0.000068449495,0.9592324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31428972,0.02365429,0.003984404,0.013086686,0.0014521504,0.00015699715,0.00076551817,0.00021299566,0.64239717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99652314,0.00036716135,0.00006846018,0.0002955617,0.0018998046,0.0008459893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980556,0.00039407224,0.000053854452,0.00013907808,0.0011417489,0.00021564968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016943394,0.00074656133,0.0005006486,0.0042672153,0.015600459,0.011561539,0.0016594621,0.003711114,0.023535358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007301613,0.0007280275,0.00040665758,0.0061551733,0.01437495,0.0029602663,0.0012594758,0.0049891584,0.001993234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002773145,0.0000027901094,0.00008014102,0.000019816423,0.0000016816367,0.000014572053,0.00061259954,0.00009565288,0.000024157567,0.93492377,0.059729293,0.0044927397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000087642,0.0000031942832,0.0015261078,0.00020456497,0.00001263537,0.000025012641,0.0008049903,0.00018795404,0.00008008825,0.10698283,0.8901357,0.000028179356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99115366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9942485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.115976885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.115976885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1994177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8414751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793387171","doi":"","title":"Minutes of proceedings of ... annual meeting of the Canadian Bar Association.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Bar (unit); Geography; Psychology; Meteorology","score_opus":0.010898487691069313,"score_gpt":0.21397217813948677,"score_spread":0.20307369044841744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793387171","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031915698,0.035170432,0.0006115519,0.07705709,0.04848965,0.0005365481,0.03764751,0.0005294772,0.7967661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005686362,0.003904599,0.0002694944,0.003617161,0.0020483956,0.00006863621,0.003800899,0.00011757282,0.9804869],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883,0.00007111225,0.000028952292,0.00010044236,0.00071316835,0.00025640734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977145,0.00014726009,0.000055136232,0.000056520024,0.001538796,0.00048771568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010056903,0.0009406574,0.00054841104,0.001881258,0.0065910956,0.0027174759,0.0013119514,0.0026253073,0.23754744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030310391,0.000439231,0.00043126362,0.0018585471,0.0007153664,0.0012931431,0.001058759,0.0022985132,0.08203559],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073694637,0.0000029143112,0.000050692568,0.000013630117,7.4959706e-7,0.000008006277,0.00002792289,0.0000085519,0.000025475656,0.0002601646,0.9962489,0.0033455614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025753063,0.0000021076526,0.0016796776,0.000026681379,0.00000150001,0.000007002712,0.00016646356,0.000012370621,0.000029583405,0.00014595623,0.99792045,0.0000055594105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72583675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9209782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27416325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010312037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016862454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79467535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793781899","doi":"","title":"Section 1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: interpretation of a signpost","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Law; Computer science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.009246597112698233,"score_gpt":0.21373629752223214,"score_spread":0.2044897004095339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793781899","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00215937,0.0048547895,0.0017943545,0.029131085,0.0027747704,0.00017433318,0.002336005,0.00016883566,0.95660645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.058927163,0.003745199,0.005012676,0.021602478,0.00083270256,0.00023292741,0.00091642817,0.0002456565,0.9084848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933008,0.0004883805,0.00016451864,0.0005529363,0.0037845408,0.0017088425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99750274,0.0004312288,0.0000935771,0.00013901868,0.0015529391,0.0002804382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025304398,0.0009435087,0.00065987586,0.0038215746,0.013917873,0.013667232,0.0027611575,0.008300327,0.036770225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007660167,0.00093569333,0.00087751384,0.005231938,0.01059069,0.0030385805,0.0019464403,0.008322096,0.00568363],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007126097,0.000007267728,0.00011503736,0.000051652994,0.0000016311527,0.000037010293,0.0017223397,0.00005326636,0.00008651576,0.64562315,0.3453437,0.0069513298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055141104,0.00000431881,0.0013577648,0.00015044364,0.0000065770078,0.000029621455,0.00097408815,0.00005523229,0.00015882365,0.029090784,0.9681302,0.00003659764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9777378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9876522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06610888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06610888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19107625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47965574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794092487","doi":"","title":"Canadian constitutional dilemmas revisited","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.018936438924443157,"score_gpt":0.24261475620774955,"score_spread":0.2236783172833064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794092487","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0067594126,0.012051818,0.00051453337,0.292803,0.0027448495,0.000050245104,0.0007141855,0.000083611165,0.6842784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26022583,0.013451239,0.002079107,0.16100207,0.002365052,0.00017452532,0.00049306324,0.00023814029,0.559971],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.987856,0.0010817811,0.00023098882,0.0011325761,0.0060469857,0.0036517673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941788,0.0013861816,0.00013949932,0.0003134822,0.002958383,0.001023662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005115964,0.000962031,0.0009409649,0.006635569,0.04163781,0.020832207,0.004558443,0.014613961,0.033760313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018475343,0.0010302637,0.001080449,0.011136019,0.018850032,0.0057255025,0.004470958,0.014217059,0.0022803554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013202582,0.000008464048,0.0002020754,0.000035615198,0.000007318334,0.00007172176,0.0017492841,0.00011850367,0.000031169508,0.7200002,0.26876667,0.00899572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022913104,0.0000032912608,0.001264825,0.00010574562,0.000019102012,0.000050817736,0.0028441376,0.00010816631,0.00006844981,0.050469697,0.9450004,0.000042299635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9907362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.994169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8188641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18113591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2527127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9497663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794211010","doi":"","title":"1998 constitutional cases: an analysis of the 1998 constitutional decisions of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Constitutional court; Constitutional right; Political science; Constitutional law; Constitution","score_opus":0.023666251795728156,"score_gpt":0.24995885561176595,"score_spread":0.2262926038160378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794211010","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23299663,0.015349342,0.001638333,0.053429116,0.00055528764,0.0004708518,0.008457202,0.000086751905,0.68701655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8557751,0.009072847,0.0017787012,0.008641822,0.0002992495,0.00022837362,0.0023114223,0.00009627519,0.12179621],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926724,0.00031370588,0.00010526125,0.00032910163,0.0038469147,0.0027325458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99352515,0.00222942,0.0004333978,0.00014320505,0.0030857956,0.00058309344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027679221,0.0005081018,0.00053272716,0.008099662,0.016801534,0.010172207,0.0032116582,0.004533882,0.012115517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017986985,0.0007537356,0.0007356591,0.018404296,0.005805168,0.0022566456,0.0016524546,0.004841397,0.00074111804],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000129825,0.00011353566,0.012480382,0.00017094723,0.00005332969,0.0008469038,0.012789017,0.0022877275,0.0004647098,0.72699785,0.20346661,0.040199157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012969103,0.000038422975,0.18625367,0.00089217967,0.00023667296,0.0002193023,0.041094955,0.004116195,0.0010680803,0.062374976,0.7034054,0.00017039356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99151444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99680066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1505848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1505848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17237452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98520124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794302138","doi":"10.1017/9781108551069","title":"Legislated rights securing human rights through legislation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Legislation; Legislature; Political science; Fundamental rights; Law; Reservation of rights; International human rights law; Object (grammar); Right to property; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.038012670556905624,"score_gpt":0.3137025319868059,"score_spread":0.2756898614299003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794302138","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003325575,0.006129951,0.01778346,0.022173857,0.001137715,0.00008800484,0.00008022956,0.00011733647,0.9491639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4041253,0.021204326,0.029260902,0.02416226,0.0021595827,0.00068918767,0.00033951827,0.00034098804,0.51771796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99499655,0.0021120575,0.00018994557,0.0005241338,0.0018297922,0.000347534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99753594,0.0014988466,0.0001497013,0.0003381669,0.00040044019,0.000076934644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058551515,0.00027586054,0.00035494423,0.0008788058,0.002783563,0.0059899725,0.0011171226,0.0036296833,0.007114403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008369737,0.0003031433,0.00037017322,0.00084455905,0.018158782,0.005552678,0.002825422,0.006014253,0.0025070857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.9156796e-7,0.0000026808502,0.000009677452,0.000012150555,5.4344406e-7,0.0000059461095,0.0005837125,0.000051224197,0.00006453644,0.9915139,0.0043715755,0.003383608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070693754,0.000010490042,0.00015032964,0.0002466864,0.000004731999,0.000039090257,0.0005074458,0.00017300344,0.0003041623,0.45477286,0.54377407,0.000010184435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037027274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036006046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007114403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003883091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007949087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030965388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794329758","doi":"","title":"A collection of the acts passed in the Parliament of Great Britain and of other public acts relative to Canada.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Law; History; Politics","score_opus":0.02150704029958448,"score_gpt":0.22950356082112341,"score_spread":0.20799652052153894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794329758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054982435,0.1052701,0.0014848245,0.008471522,0.0055184895,0.00023722663,0.09226205,0.0008819437,0.7803756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019797744,0.027909636,0.0015265293,0.002008572,0.0007666215,0.00008359486,0.024813116,0.0003105147,0.9227836],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951875,0.00002797268,0.000021393833,0.000030269164,0.00032854252,0.00007310855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922204,0.00012475785,0.000038338676,0.00004002779,0.000478204,0.00009658023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025215786,0.00081262714,0.00049627194,0.0054205824,0.003477748,0.00290864,0.0008457313,0.00065380934,0.048162036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013819318,0.0004090772,0.0002902837,0.010626005,0.0011783269,0.0009782877,0.0005292991,0.0009812447,0.0134066045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009398733,0.0000056667263,0.00014848211,0.00012948248,0.0000029659925,0.000035614234,0.00037218045,0.000053907956,0.000069062444,0.0029028584,0.9696367,0.026633639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015795122,0.0000026188245,0.0039765057,0.00011379458,0.0000028512538,0.000040969913,0.0003106617,0.000017102535,0.00007306736,0.0006525428,0.99480283,0.000005524697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8435812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.960005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1564188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012596651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022335926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31467992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794389905","doi":"","title":"The constitution of Canada; an introduction to its development and law,","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01438493784112939,"score_gpt":0.22537250416981824,"score_spread":0.21098756632868884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794389905","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021587794,0.21784393,0.002557758,0.037520397,0.0039139967,0.000161477,0.005288806,0.000361252,0.7301937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08994948,0.19116612,0.009388175,0.016146595,0.0024283435,0.00033946894,0.0033417044,0.000517162,0.686723],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803346,0.00013455132,0.0000493484,0.00012901858,0.0012931686,0.00036042742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885345,0.00022129652,0.000044749253,0.000048259302,0.00065833464,0.00017383168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009989053,0.0010193571,0.0006485005,0.008059635,0.010685447,0.010935033,0.002098806,0.0027267223,0.022215135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003414724,0.000775575,0.00041915357,0.0128821,0.008104946,0.0024807046,0.0009652854,0.0031542596,0.0025986445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005138442,0.000015273958,0.0003183565,0.00016720944,0.0000047921953,0.000044132386,0.0009564089,0.00028825586,0.00006451172,0.36418155,0.60410494,0.029849343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016858652,0.0000013904616,0.0012118019,0.00016264146,0.0000035435035,0.000020394547,0.0004465278,0.00007671598,0.00003481914,0.010913964,0.98711234,0.000014178016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9900595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99614763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13583277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13583277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20803049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98554033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794874452","doi":"","title":"The death and life of constitutional reform in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.016455836345146028,"score_gpt":0.22352274858123627,"score_spread":0.20706691223609025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794874452","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05187983,0.053186804,0.0012057059,0.39713052,0.002593178,0.000086452266,0.0013121733,0.00012636153,0.4924789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69242823,0.020051861,0.0011351543,0.046750233,0.00088245433,0.000095851974,0.00028945648,0.00020009815,0.23816662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98718166,0.0013790507,0.0002140435,0.000783889,0.0046080984,0.005833271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98782116,0.0027602816,0.000472838,0.0004840053,0.0057003335,0.002761482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053131403,0.0005832693,0.0012367364,0.003779627,0.049207453,0.026055066,0.0032617967,0.009446952,0.014858441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021912722,0.0009481216,0.0006942628,0.009375684,0.031200614,0.0059129354,0.0042433497,0.013286447,0.0007870425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033320306,0.000022109216,0.0010152147,0.000073553514,0.000019545412,0.000110508656,0.0068089627,0.00048501082,0.000056702727,0.8402713,0.1355796,0.015524122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004026151,0.000020309055,0.009033718,0.00044473106,0.000058837537,0.00005635474,0.017055938,0.0006836508,0.00024043322,0.102255024,0.8699541,0.00015677819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9983895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35729253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.35729253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5356852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74544954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795683816","doi":"10.29173/alr1256","title":"Alberta's Energy and Utilities Board and the Constitution of Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency","keywords":"Tribunal; Charter; Law; Treaty; Supreme court; Constitution; Political science; Duty","score_opus":0.0182470349305277,"score_gpt":0.24023471591979728,"score_spread":0.22198768098926958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795683816","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0096068485,0.05518559,0.0009260281,0.05368305,0.002393588,0.000093404924,0.0012505793,0.00008011603,0.8767807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36373517,0.033130087,0.0023933924,0.037824295,0.0010118958,0.0001613555,0.000903094,0.00010393136,0.5607367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99580425,0.00044306417,0.000109960245,0.00034225022,0.0019557374,0.0013447959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963283,0.0011400088,0.00015567195,0.00019225507,0.0017218856,0.00046195174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023434332,0.0004674401,0.00043856638,0.0024751318,0.014432272,0.009136773,0.001866052,0.0055904477,0.013184682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064271307,0.0004961104,0.00034610525,0.004118297,0.009605241,0.0015222968,0.0014328047,0.0041063223,0.0008719155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001149625,0.000009401955,0.00060037634,0.00006463444,0.000006931814,0.00015325687,0.0006806621,0.00038906766,0.00009491093,0.8855216,0.10325787,0.009209811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017829801,0.000007506086,0.0046021002,0.00028617305,0.000018887546,0.000037219335,0.00085183646,0.00017882754,0.000085527725,0.028621327,0.9652546,0.00003811367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9859687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9929959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9161338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08386619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19987229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60849464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796422130","doi":"10.29173/alr1428","title":"Political Corruption, Judicial Selection, and the Rule of Law","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Politics; Language change; Political science; Rule of law; Selection (genetic algorithm); Judicial opinion; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.020830815458883486,"score_gpt":0.3077665183746738,"score_spread":0.2869357029157903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796422130","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10483845,0.052292604,0.009907662,0.07832312,0.0007059535,0.000070301045,0.000075546544,0.000046432848,0.75373995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9727025,0.00867782,0.00082079315,0.004087395,0.00034714286,0.000018696235,0.000018725268,0.000010853064,0.013316049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923328,0.002494233,0.00014764549,0.00034667802,0.002855576,0.0018231237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99350315,0.0037502348,0.0008811695,0.00020093576,0.0013325994,0.00033193218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005178931,0.00017994993,0.00032066216,0.00213432,0.0057997378,0.005849079,0.00070740195,0.0015504106,0.002080522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009861172,0.00015703836,0.00016753993,0.002812645,0.026003312,0.0011787371,0.00101414,0.0019773562,0.00016213236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048924976,0.000008424811,0.0008815324,0.000024641751,0.0000029377939,0.00007027833,0.0010013502,0.0003560799,0.000045998146,0.9870465,0.003251708,0.0073056826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044364744,0.000055029304,0.020611111,0.00045214445,0.000027680475,0.00019961271,0.005331752,0.0011789275,0.0003921986,0.72053146,0.25113094,0.000044698205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36157632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44505668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36157632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017229708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026331173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7189434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2797169896","doi":"10.3968/10230","title":"A Comparative Study of the Formal Rule of Law and the Substantive Rule of Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Principle of legality; Rule of law; Law; Philosophy of law; Political science; Comparative law; Public law; Situational ethics; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.042627356750520616,"score_gpt":0.3157325904034565,"score_spread":0.27310523365293593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2797169896","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2790021,0.011246213,0.009971511,0.011010652,0.00021670572,0.00008276067,0.00008013036,0.000018568759,0.68837136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99342656,0.0015961545,0.0011191961,0.00031697613,0.00004438977,0.000019278901,0.00002419267,0.000007819299,0.0034453452],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99391323,0.003437059,0.0001393161,0.00036974179,0.0014372984,0.0007032359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98128283,0.015271885,0.001001222,0.0006438475,0.0013924552,0.00040775293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005262175,0.00015371066,0.00038617753,0.0029061725,0.0029721656,0.0052620177,0.00078056566,0.0012400628,0.0042336816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019828953,0.00013695419,0.0003059419,0.0034882626,0.021718178,0.0062181824,0.0017098505,0.0015332177,0.0001584261],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012227992,0.000015185478,0.0007251115,0.000038262893,0.000003181908,0.00006697815,0.0043810676,0.00014625955,0.000080182006,0.9886175,0.00053749216,0.0053765727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052323692,0.0001660921,0.035586864,0.0005620262,0.000037204958,0.0003060033,0.036510274,0.0030001814,0.0004222479,0.79713386,0.12617408,0.000048893522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05958101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06959356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05958101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012062992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068637063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.118468404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799495960","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3137307","title":"Administrative Constitutionalism and the Unity of Public Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Law; Administrative law; Public law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.04635665402241745,"score_gpt":0.3261685844317794,"score_spread":0.2798119304093619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799495960","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19751567,0.003483399,0.042178858,0.07308102,0.0004884333,0.00008561567,0.00020939957,0.00012684445,0.6828307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943744,0.00017311906,0.0012337638,0.0007655129,0.00020548515,0.00003158799,0.000028178663,0.000019991976,0.0031680344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9810477,0.009863405,0.00066163955,0.0026111617,0.0028682551,0.0029480178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.973103,0.016670777,0.0022251052,0.0043714857,0.002013156,0.0016165877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017933907,0.0003334647,0.0011105541,0.0028048134,0.011301259,0.017563071,0.0021382724,0.006066348,0.0058797696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036591575,0.0006542014,0.0010771736,0.0029263229,0.06671244,0.013567426,0.0084089255,0.009568713,0.00064566557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041021335,0.00000584243,0.00007775908,0.0000036464537,0.0000018203316,0.0000051893276,0.0006476977,0.00007042562,0.000015169394,0.9984523,0.00021226052,0.00050365756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013983383,0.0000056753515,0.0003271134,0.000012425851,0.000005023194,0.000008319257,0.000517971,0.00017021364,0.000054215638,0.9943646,0.0045161955,0.0000043275227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071206833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055067693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017933907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070137484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013874155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0948447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799508378","doi":"10.15688/lc.jvolsu.2017.4.20","title":"The Constitution and the Supreme Court of Canada: from Appellate Tribunal to Final Court of Appeal","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Concept","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Tribunal; Law; Supreme court; Constitution; Political science; Remand (court procedure); Original jurisdiction; Law of the case; Certiorari; Court of record","score_opus":0.025763139659692853,"score_gpt":0.27549725383311535,"score_spread":0.2497341141734225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799508378","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026712487,0.07250648,0.0025212779,0.08482618,0.0025218166,0.000082732695,0.0010410801,0.00010143197,0.8096865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8713611,0.033281043,0.0020620648,0.012691619,0.0013787326,0.000051135783,0.0005158629,0.00008479359,0.07857367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956857,0.00050575304,0.00007881856,0.00041367326,0.0018902568,0.0014258627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99770725,0.00076417776,0.00014647299,0.000073061354,0.0009676617,0.00034125402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001169805,0.00030548638,0.00029964861,0.0028799907,0.014461431,0.013856381,0.001386402,0.0033412252,0.008678012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005493254,0.00044967578,0.0002419833,0.006078654,0.020372698,0.0025170387,0.001933708,0.0042623794,0.00050428906],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007652195,0.000005297155,0.00064153346,0.000042111285,0.0000034327659,0.00015709964,0.0024793032,0.00026215243,0.00005571969,0.94553363,0.038506787,0.012305225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012970385,0.000011378866,0.011127978,0.00070208334,0.00002427989,0.00017075065,0.0039821505,0.0006534371,0.00016243864,0.1185364,0.86453706,0.00007901542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98191273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98602664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14227329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14227329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12752023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9948414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799731806","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199579891.013.10","title":"Federal Judicial Tenure","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Successor cardinal; Scholarship; Incentive; Politics; Political science; Legislature; Law; Public administration; Economics","score_opus":0.0386980725004983,"score_gpt":0.2568387159796858,"score_spread":0.21814064347918752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799731806","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019512217,0.008450093,0.00037290328,0.0036921722,0.00080239895,0.000008745698,0.00017753144,0.000024673282,0.98452026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.118688755,0.006337204,0.00034086496,0.0022096215,0.0010744031,0.000029232664,0.00025835616,0.000036486963,0.87102515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923444,0.00013080522,0.00002389455,0.0001379872,0.0002422624,0.00023057456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996019,0.00011589148,0.000027580296,0.00006275825,0.00013912456,0.000052750613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007653291,0.00021749256,0.00022736397,0.0009800041,0.0046874695,0.0033504746,0.0005401717,0.0014735339,0.036794275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017443482,0.0001791159,0.00021505602,0.0013190497,0.0019229276,0.0019316577,0.0013105908,0.0019274025,0.009320958],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000813108,0.000011070879,0.00014958021,0.000041878633,0.0000013750883,0.000030794672,0.00085664075,0.000053902157,0.00010009105,0.7893767,0.17042983,0.03894008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019802096,0.0000054752827,0.00062817585,0.000107268286,0.0000020172834,0.000029944491,0.00018165605,0.00003065133,0.000068638605,0.02576867,0.97317266,0.0000028156776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01622859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03415091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036794275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005656799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003759687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.123089135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800654004","doi":"10.3390/laws7020014","title":"Assessing Judicial Empowerment","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Empowerment; Politics; Law; Human rights; Situated; Political science; Expression (computer science); Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.052326344257165786,"score_gpt":0.37533473754192725,"score_spread":0.3230083932847615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800654004","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6041561,0.0020389478,0.011974059,0.008837969,0.00027862933,0.00053716806,0.00059935154,0.00003560107,0.37154222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99230736,0.00061437814,0.0020222487,0.0008014438,0.0001249028,0.0002640813,0.0002441817,0.000018806048,0.0036026456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9559071,0.020651875,0.0023864834,0.0035668944,0.013538684,0.003948908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8516482,0.096852496,0.018620674,0.008389096,0.0210819,0.0034075603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04320025,0.00031811447,0.00058683136,0.006934017,0.005001155,0.006441474,0.0011688397,0.0016499269,0.011061733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15953776,0.00019474626,0.00050767843,0.0044894693,0.009404239,0.0073138312,0.008275624,0.0027429094,0.0007216852],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013872603,0.00022304914,0.146429,0.00038183777,0.00009767923,0.00052351283,0.09719242,0.0010529903,0.0013524615,0.6263108,0.008817795,0.11747975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009914282,0.00042918243,0.3253583,0.0017398424,0.00019198799,0.00066922395,0.17375758,0.0026766073,0.0053188778,0.21462049,0.27498367,0.00015513494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004105308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006835259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04320025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031646248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005579386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22846752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802153528","doi":"10.5931/djim.v14i0.7872","title":"Peering into the Private Lives of Judges: Reconciling Judicial Accountability and Privacy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Argument (complex analysis); Harm; Political science; Economic Justice; Law; Diversity (politics); Public interest; Judicial review; Sociology","score_opus":0.025997220084521527,"score_gpt":0.33057027682282686,"score_spread":0.3045730567383053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802153528","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55533075,0.003562758,0.016875092,0.15348493,0.0006766712,0.0001564096,0.00007885331,0.000060374925,0.26977405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918793,0.00042699202,0.0007589569,0.002154485,0.00010349648,0.000018252887,0.0000091072,0.000014380337,0.0046351072],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.929917,0.046649374,0.0009474818,0.0025668787,0.012040257,0.00787899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9510982,0.02381351,0.004801336,0.003872524,0.010208158,0.0062063015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030308187,0.00041124588,0.0005902627,0.0017824813,0.03936329,0.019030547,0.0026206744,0.0038468812,0.0024079138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07936103,0.00043789527,0.0003089784,0.0014660277,0.05493417,0.010442071,0.01565017,0.0061815428,0.00023395305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057137422,0.00004365418,0.010710653,0.00006012591,0.00002384383,0.0006041094,0.65156865,0.0003584839,0.00059979415,0.29248196,0.0077829827,0.035708614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037001664,0.00011329691,0.015589031,0.00041369037,0.00007162201,0.00039341534,0.59420925,0.0011326068,0.0010571957,0.19890285,0.18792431,0.00015574376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39845154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5040814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39845154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029439734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.072242394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7922646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802181875","doi":"","title":"Cruel, Unusual, and Constitutionally Infirm: Mandatory Minimum Sentences in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Philosophy; Psychology; Criminology","score_opus":0.03243567578332732,"score_gpt":0.32246164776872843,"score_spread":0.29002597198540114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802181875","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27708608,0.050243907,0.002552183,0.31986523,0.0017143864,0.00029671742,0.002149506,0.00017770265,0.3459144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91085696,0.015849723,0.0018302568,0.043881837,0.0006769142,0.00012307154,0.00033081626,0.000084080115,0.026366338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97982496,0.0018109368,0.0008690942,0.0018119847,0.009468938,0.00621396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96031207,0.017519463,0.0020924122,0.0009832309,0.0149084525,0.004184342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01236247,0.00048176316,0.0013296638,0.0037815464,0.0231034,0.014106557,0.007555071,0.00966739,0.008121228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06114361,0.001132925,0.0007881544,0.0062533994,0.01501575,0.0036395905,0.004592771,0.014640035,0.0003909434],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016906406,0.0002120674,0.0281874,0.00091071945,0.00014341687,0.0009860682,0.019816024,0.0015465133,0.0007401399,0.6852966,0.16770835,0.09428369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031021994,0.00017453983,0.24137725,0.0059781694,0.0009091774,0.00059249526,0.03641692,0.00433103,0.0017086237,0.1195925,0.5877901,0.00081901235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99368393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99827254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15766118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15766118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.40821454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9769936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802249588","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0043","title":"Canadian Constitutional Culture","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; State (computer science); Law; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03492128016532631,"score_gpt":0.23747456433561465,"score_spread":0.20255328417028834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802249588","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013034724,0.0057094246,0.000882576,0.025472289,0.00049553555,0.000026115917,0.000492486,0.00007459831,0.95381236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7124337,0.010889132,0.0019296551,0.0058343746,0.00019281603,0.000043063836,0.00057640485,0.0001786249,0.26792225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99683136,0.00036829733,0.000060227103,0.00033763584,0.0014913966,0.00091104145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99707663,0.0004465251,0.00009215374,0.00020384789,0.0016512916,0.00052951527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018257527,0.00041381817,0.00033812446,0.0028024379,0.022797946,0.012572647,0.0017625669,0.0016309214,0.021359393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047789738,0.00025507962,0.00024047474,0.0053750123,0.015866613,0.0025567599,0.0020898709,0.00362813,0.0012019944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035046749,0.0000038538633,0.00037505935,0.000027482381,0.0000023098814,0.00007288279,0.010183083,0.00014787063,0.00007099005,0.9281137,0.049060687,0.011938611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021203018,0.0000030333797,0.0013430152,0.0001271237,0.0000042715387,0.00004932471,0.0089506265,0.00016272833,0.00009056867,0.020224728,0.96902287,0.00001958244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9763472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9822666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83142775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16857226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14396451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9643383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802924569","doi":"10.1017/9781108100007","title":"Vigilance and Restraint in the Common Law of Judicial Review","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Judicial review; Knight; Law; Commonwealth; Political science; Neutrality; Balance (ability); Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.03635546581907552,"score_gpt":0.2637874370845827,"score_spread":0.22743197126550718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802924569","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041666795,0.03916806,0.03807424,0.079731174,0.001131613,0.0001907482,0.000059450136,0.00011993074,0.799858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9468542,0.006175786,0.005460309,0.0066774767,0.0015618405,0.0002609799,0.000026865162,0.00008183186,0.032900833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9368901,0.038387336,0.003052755,0.004779845,0.01329453,0.0035954502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94920355,0.03599984,0.0038711838,0.0054991003,0.004297627,0.0011287474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027787983,0.00038580954,0.00073655765,0.0032784878,0.0066868085,0.020299766,0.0019031081,0.005089781,0.0019935367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.075450234,0.00066953077,0.00067457487,0.0037067211,0.06372398,0.010276491,0.007952694,0.0063669635,0.0005895453],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045593392,0.000004373144,0.00015280134,0.000022146938,0.000005439611,0.00003440692,0.0030910743,0.00016321527,0.000051791874,0.9885225,0.002129308,0.005818385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015406626,0.00002161681,0.0008625599,0.0002872522,0.000012187482,0.000089631234,0.0012683477,0.00044798912,0.00011066123,0.92393243,0.07292467,0.000027307166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011199377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008438854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027787983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012219603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015596309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14695865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803382897","doi":"10.22215/etd/2016-11285","title":"Potential Struggle Between the Legislative and Judicial Branches of Canada: A Contestational Approach to Interpreting the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Through Bedford &amp; PHS Community Services","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"BC Cancer Agency","keywords":"Charter; Legislature; Political science; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.022843034937842635,"score_gpt":0.2734031915610732,"score_spread":0.25056015662323056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2803382897","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11488624,0.004437216,0.005389259,0.4929872,0.0006649109,0.00016276698,0.00025658848,0.00004370032,0.38117206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9569849,0.0015468351,0.0030175128,0.018764371,0.0001238703,0.00007157921,0.000041236955,0.000054916392,0.01939475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9755136,0.007005959,0.0004800828,0.0016514293,0.005931989,0.009417025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9744719,0.010941792,0.0013373825,0.0005572767,0.008024751,0.0046668397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017977908,0.0006678604,0.0007494461,0.004791473,0.081293866,0.036544476,0.0054104915,0.01346706,0.0066524595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035345923,0.0010311224,0.000752595,0.0057689045,0.057966944,0.008992097,0.008496375,0.017819822,0.00028152418],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015050709,0.000011728324,0.0015973522,0.000032516262,0.000010489526,0.0003186972,0.07396876,0.00044002596,0.00013746164,0.89501256,0.02105779,0.0073976256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004572741,0.000020978305,0.011002103,0.0011112274,0.00008854427,0.00022352883,0.4056119,0.0034647626,0.0006705267,0.3033574,0.2740899,0.00031344075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99312055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99731356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28068286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.28068286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.48491654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83430594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804124309","doi":"","title":"Le nouvel ordre constitutionnel canadien","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.01967552889521152,"score_gpt":0.23559407604154975,"score_spread":0.21591854714633824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804124309","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03620889,0.019261507,0.011287372,0.08400804,0.0027713731,0.00003404966,0.00023831132,0.00017899969,0.8460115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7786103,0.0061352886,0.004813164,0.006780393,0.0025550395,0.00011217473,0.0001195396,0.00020309465,0.20067096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887532,0.0058061667,0.0002323932,0.00115072,0.00294801,0.0011094041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99249905,0.0046688733,0.00029900813,0.001231367,0.000973734,0.00032795046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007608051,0.0005881657,0.00095137104,0.0028280106,0.008361201,0.014015475,0.0011288804,0.005126968,0.016052967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016229633,0.00043882255,0.00053461664,0.0026232381,0.01769191,0.006967487,0.0030653875,0.010312519,0.0015895814],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004874896,0.0000046157056,0.00006470435,0.000007593569,0.0000027571969,0.000015780586,0.00038097554,0.000060470906,0.000042078795,0.9944852,0.0022326035,0.0026983286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033260458,0.000017457065,0.0014376728,0.00015831461,0.000013314788,0.00014508922,0.001318217,0.00040445098,0.00040306785,0.5128433,0.4831868,0.000039057606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05190031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04658107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9866053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013394684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008683268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10319638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804520237","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Law in an Age of Proportionality","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":156,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Law; Political science; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.12257582338184182,"score_gpt":0.36662460773499816,"score_spread":0.24404878435315636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804520237","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017463394,0.023822755,0.14550416,0.16923887,0.0035515064,0.00017812087,0.00038033235,0.00026070426,0.6396003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.799909,0.013496604,0.049925983,0.047060907,0.007291151,0.0006125991,0.00031680573,0.00024413427,0.08114285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98431474,0.0066158134,0.00074875593,0.0036379443,0.00379757,0.0008852033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870908,0.008080865,0.0005403595,0.0022910186,0.0016681383,0.00032886866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018887162,0.0004984993,0.00079394394,0.0021090324,0.0061289095,0.0109093385,0.0015865013,0.005943489,0.0063769324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025729721,0.00052707054,0.00078906026,0.002030792,0.04549856,0.017133005,0.004870187,0.014069011,0.00079784595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.762358e-7,9.1672274e-7,0.000010259698,0.0000036843157,7.08279e-7,0.0000048918487,0.00016588312,0.000037599417,0.000013483366,0.9980292,0.00063168455,0.0011007879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074988343,0.000009253256,0.00006499297,0.00005211769,0.0000040336295,0.000023440798,0.00013796763,0.00024349378,0.0000727775,0.91501004,0.08436567,0.000008704958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008365306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004367704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018887162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010977657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007318766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09988606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804727763","doi":"10.5539/ijel.v8n5p106","title":"Interface Between National Ideologies and the Constitution of Pakistan","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of English Linguistics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Constitution; Politics; Democracy; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03317931734761564,"score_gpt":0.3680183507725566,"score_spread":0.334839033424941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804727763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5609834,0.00083972537,0.0026024855,0.0026338284,0.0000838571,0.00004156508,0.00008460512,0.000015251746,0.43271527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982589,0.00015120984,0.00023460435,0.000034692002,0.000008401809,0.000006013814,0.000011130556,0.0000020357697,0.0012929095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989849,0.0004980525,0.000052118026,0.00009718422,0.00016876275,0.00019896838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979657,0.0012066929,0.0003190634,0.00013985157,0.00023488821,0.00013385263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018974916,0.00010906089,0.0001359256,0.0012829156,0.0038966897,0.0051021534,0.00018889325,0.00031144792,0.002862748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030172048,0.00011087687,0.0001016248,0.0010803667,0.0080087315,0.0018587896,0.0017892442,0.0010221603,0.00014699044],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058476442,0.000045808865,0.012668104,0.000065498316,0.0000076331,0.0007627257,0.0673378,0.00032099689,0.0006245219,0.887389,0.0015208605,0.029198613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056197365,0.00017385265,0.12173447,0.00058128225,0.00004560312,0.0011160013,0.24445462,0.002401143,0.0025196602,0.35895318,0.26788375,0.00008028908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065202536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00855274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065202536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043525784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035102607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03158033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2805163191","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0009","title":"Parliamentary Sovereignty in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliamentary sovereignty; Parliament; Statute; Political science; Sovereignty; Law; Context (archaeology); Popular sovereignty; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.03430705599024367,"score_gpt":0.22165235385963605,"score_spread":0.18734529786939239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2805163191","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03301124,0.0109423725,0.0009777738,0.026911534,0.00037558863,0.000031150772,0.0002203735,0.000045151446,0.92748475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82594866,0.0073218676,0.00074100983,0.004512972,0.0001224901,0.000027442764,0.00013002646,0.000042373213,0.16115311],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971105,0.00027522145,0.00005072954,0.00025881972,0.0012640305,0.0010406798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980818,0.00042915414,0.0000763346,0.00007949876,0.0009973195,0.0003358572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015065037,0.00026591166,0.00034768306,0.0016918401,0.019489512,0.008523066,0.0011604815,0.0021760643,0.01196736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036031955,0.00027375613,0.00025005918,0.0032886348,0.0150724435,0.0015098684,0.0024264292,0.003986613,0.00050108804],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000760716,0.000006379352,0.00050349766,0.000042505635,0.0000046182467,0.00013918865,0.011191825,0.00023358734,0.00012937518,0.9479775,0.026972186,0.012791758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001188245,0.000009170013,0.0045736637,0.0002874355,0.000017837807,0.00008125875,0.007978649,0.0004145783,0.00022579497,0.039978113,0.9463824,0.00003916543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99163294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9944507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13093524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13093524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1953567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95000607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2805463457","doi":"10.22456/0104-6594.69963","title":"Direito indigenista nas constituições de Brasil e Canadá: um estudo comparado","year":2017,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista da Faculdade de Direito","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina; Memorial University of Newfoundland","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06845008946806487,"score_gpt":0.3559539645207794,"score_spread":0.2875038750527145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2805463457","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9699321,0.0020587293,0.00019111618,0.002222235,0.000022082979,0.00011467807,0.0008131785,0.00000488708,0.024640974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940619,0.0018227664,0.00040000008,0.00036947292,0.0000057173693,0.00004571016,0.00024776938,0.0000068394165,0.0030399684],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99665195,0.00046187357,0.00010812797,0.00028389908,0.0010068917,0.0014872254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99464697,0.001346173,0.0006761698,0.00018588493,0.0020628448,0.0010818098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021036651,0.0003051557,0.00083995925,0.004633693,0.017068326,0.00600116,0.0015046607,0.001221965,0.0036271268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074817105,0.00050109834,0.00035793244,0.014970124,0.005527364,0.002033071,0.0038364795,0.0021755747,0.00012884766],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002664652,0.00024723212,0.5047374,0.0005230377,0.00012318447,0.0011360331,0.33541527,0.00035136295,0.0008050643,0.092214026,0.008114057,0.056066792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003144334,0.00005208582,0.47595114,0.0005777988,0.00015223528,0.0002639955,0.48578787,0.00030273813,0.00042688847,0.0022500474,0.034147162,0.000056515008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99040496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.067981936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.067981936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15239963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49324578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2805665929","doi":"10.5539/ass.v14n6p71","title":"Parliamentary Immunity in International Legislation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Social Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Constitution; Duty; Legislation; Sovereign immunity; Law; Political science; Executive branch; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.029922659885101552,"score_gpt":0.33443072638148863,"score_spread":0.30450806649638706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2805665929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1350043,0.004595512,0.0195875,0.010617884,0.00068205193,0.00010765217,0.00006376854,0.0000590617,0.8292823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97701526,0.000634897,0.002080969,0.0017167144,0.00026121107,0.00006055511,0.000026101668,0.00001795809,0.018186383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99291503,0.0031150435,0.00041471235,0.0010520468,0.0011491977,0.0013538967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952016,0.0026826027,0.0007788481,0.0005562356,0.0005200894,0.0002606606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005457235,0.0001718294,0.00026419628,0.0013858639,0.00504199,0.004155776,0.0005254997,0.0020984577,0.005773367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011295527,0.00020959892,0.00042692537,0.0013329065,0.016598346,0.0030015507,0.0033089092,0.003880117,0.00050044915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044463222,0.000009955676,0.00045049595,0.000017821676,0.0000021783603,0.00005556936,0.003261767,0.000054992237,0.000106629646,0.9916198,0.0007497919,0.0036665478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028147526,0.00013054592,0.015880879,0.0005907503,0.00005172706,0.00046571626,0.0059480304,0.0009057726,0.0019499939,0.6114319,0.3625675,0.000049092123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026711712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002379752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005773367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002824283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025589399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028860986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2805689105","doi":"10.29173/alr1437","title":"Special Issue on Judicial Appointments - Foreword","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.025530403015421782,"score_gpt":0.3136804387163318,"score_spread":0.28815003570091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2805689105","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010688893,0.034823466,0.000584902,0.139322,0.64728004,0.00052066904,0.0026448413,0.0005255655,0.17322962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007294365,0.017235285,0.00066279655,0.12574945,0.32558382,0.0004953625,0.001648926,0.00031868118,0.52101135],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99448085,0.0004467558,0.0004371515,0.00062130153,0.0031635484,0.00085050147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844959,0.0052819704,0.0006610496,0.00096238026,0.0072299847,0.0013685895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004820533,0.0019218818,0.0036911778,0.010894684,0.0076060314,0.010499222,0.00522693,0.029554686,0.066550575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015198901,0.0013201834,0.001718851,0.00609805,0.0031913316,0.004028638,0.002628732,0.013089559,0.028683662],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013467958,0.00002208255,0.000042953685,0.00008302627,0.0000041583353,0.00004134536,0.000021547161,0.00002041932,0.00007811529,0.0021737977,0.9927664,0.0047326395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002230216,0.000026470405,0.0017253244,0.00043591135,0.000034223416,0.00005493281,0.00008319324,0.000069010806,0.00011823556,0.0023979598,0.99500847,0.000024013156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0839588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22079784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9886617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011338306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017072005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2226339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806114163","doi":"10.24908/fede.v19i1.10746","title":"Elected Judges Lead to Less Partial Judges","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federalism-E","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Separation of powers; Political science; Legislature; Judicial independence; Government (linguistics); Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.05819917273402697,"score_gpt":0.33277306278094326,"score_spread":0.2745738900469163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2806114163","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40848538,0.0013544541,0.01164254,0.026342876,0.0024105674,0.0005838329,0.00045230958,0.0004557301,0.5482724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8719381,0.00031372573,0.0037105526,0.008782232,0.00029157073,0.00016374505,0.0002270467,0.00021363104,0.114359364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832153,0.0050799977,0.0006003136,0.0030030524,0.0043190294,0.0037823482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96531993,0.009603924,0.003500654,0.0040510665,0.009903973,0.0076204273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009323256,0.0004910584,0.00081220217,0.0023350203,0.01096151,0.007904116,0.0012558516,0.0020264757,0.04392657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04737222,0.0007446145,0.00083277904,0.0018485361,0.004813657,0.0021983648,0.0063636308,0.005812416,0.0061190566],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010245175,0.00050411443,0.08584602,0.0007121014,0.00023857075,0.002615213,0.03349977,0.0015135973,0.0067686993,0.5752877,0.13648143,0.15550824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006762242,0.0009567536,0.1439184,0.00075174554,0.00046808796,0.001427406,0.024047406,0.004003236,0.0055561205,0.1374457,0.68050545,0.00024340031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03824053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12994827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04392657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008626462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009367915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.146949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806530565","doi":"10.31581/jbs-27.3.4(2017)","title":"Race, Place, and Clusters","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Bahá’í Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metropolitan area; Framing (construction); Race (biology); Political science; Sociology; Geography; Gender studies","score_opus":0.06667821448390411,"score_gpt":0.3680923250305668,"score_spread":0.30141411054666273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2806530565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80062383,0.0024746524,0.0048263557,0.008765644,0.00016888246,0.00007376282,0.00026665043,0.00005301437,0.18274726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959487,0.00025155826,0.00046996196,0.00012698083,0.000024676387,0.000018068922,0.000035945828,0.000010342344,0.0031136617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985297,0.0006290453,0.00003812619,0.00021779147,0.00025857188,0.0003268714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984133,0.0003039077,0.0003121876,0.00019514267,0.00020498809,0.0005704332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011396273,0.00020797864,0.0003770884,0.0019508259,0.006405611,0.0046444195,0.0007896864,0.00042613616,0.008078826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034876578,0.00012220489,0.00021811224,0.0035755883,0.009281215,0.002868563,0.0056079696,0.0006900099,0.00037893237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018969575,0.00008533136,0.12991303,0.00012306467,0.000087162036,0.00021184952,0.04822735,0.0012070304,0.00032281067,0.76051724,0.006611792,0.05250364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060021663,0.00023120418,0.28514013,0.0004006636,0.000094787596,0.0003744358,0.21827556,0.0021417167,0.0004468971,0.32600093,0.16675155,0.00008211324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03250288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05210108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03250288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003431738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028513612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06462741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809002756","doi":"10.1515/lehr-2018-0006","title":"The Reductionism of Global Models of Constitutional Rights","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Ethics of Human Rights","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Reductionism; Political science; Constitutional law; Democracy; Human rights; Law; Law and economics; Decolonization; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06816947780697191,"score_gpt":0.3650034817554437,"score_spread":0.2968340039484718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809002756","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040303327,0.0017497333,0.14982674,0.025076114,0.00029601526,0.00007470325,0.00010944755,0.0001529326,0.7824111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9717401,0.00066226884,0.011310581,0.0015732619,0.00020981197,0.00012383169,0.000076339114,0.00009639662,0.014207437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99102974,0.005694571,0.00019221925,0.0011754762,0.00127021,0.00063769746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941261,0.002807609,0.00034728128,0.0019121496,0.00056838285,0.00023855279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072915135,0.0005140219,0.0007351177,0.0024299184,0.0027472198,0.008447963,0.0011922523,0.0020822056,0.0077638193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006318213,0.00026412602,0.00092524907,0.001337487,0.040219642,0.0099439975,0.006596058,0.0059490553,0.0006960064],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010117901,0.0000016119801,0.00002286529,0.000003916916,0.0000012729213,0.000004386917,0.00022838236,0.0002147505,0.000011146427,0.9989342,0.000112535214,0.0004638385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035423761,0.0000033925246,0.00004965374,0.000012718335,0.000002494301,0.000009357266,0.00017628912,0.0006007272,0.000035820533,0.9920238,0.0070798495,0.0000023223383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017951346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015554286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008447963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056165573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018892481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04075122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809293198","doi":"10.1515/lehr-2018-0003","title":"Opting Out of “Global Constitutionalism”","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Ethics of Human Rights","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Society of Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"Boston College","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Convergence (economics); Nullification; Dissent; Constitutional review; Political science; Law and economics; Constitutional law; Law; Democracy; Politics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.09030422232899524,"score_gpt":0.4006400749678313,"score_spread":0.310335852638836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809293198","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20210388,0.0020478093,0.03707188,0.02757407,0.00030858928,0.00006654372,0.00007735626,0.00015527339,0.73059464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993662,0.00019484067,0.0013138457,0.0011424714,0.0000679897,0.000017612621,0.000015706173,0.000032613698,0.0035528853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99168676,0.004695287,0.00024516686,0.0013376933,0.0011423047,0.00089272903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925719,0.0038194624,0.0006609479,0.0018272902,0.00076823385,0.00035208891],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009059591,0.00030736276,0.00048176266,0.0011015141,0.0029672876,0.0071618627,0.0007891539,0.0020177613,0.004879646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009674784,0.00014396195,0.00045048646,0.0010086428,0.038939957,0.006977212,0.006173978,0.0051713656,0.0003660678],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007781628,0.0000031958828,0.00034472457,0.000017024278,0.0000044275125,0.000042658652,0.0033607413,0.00012346033,0.00012969515,0.99249554,0.0005357788,0.002934849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019031886,0.000037139693,0.0012032429,0.0001526633,0.000020510703,0.00015247137,0.0074974135,0.0006110149,0.0009664346,0.93083006,0.0584906,0.00001940844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011656232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013008701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009059591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003398348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002039941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0479123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809595885","doi":"10.29173/alr1396","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada and the Alberta Court of Appeal: Do the Top Courts Have a Fundamental Philosophical Difference of Opinion on Public Law Issues","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta; University of Windsor","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Majority opinion; Concurring opinion; Law of the case; Court of record; Political science; Precedent; Remand (court procedure); Original jurisdiction; Criticism; Sociology","score_opus":0.0412686788878519,"score_gpt":0.3062020892189442,"score_spread":0.2649334103310923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809595885","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5582801,0.04667529,0.0005920986,0.11424571,0.00056278124,0.00006347147,0.00034654344,0.00002575,0.27920827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834857,0.0035152906,0.00017120341,0.0080185095,0.000108107815,0.000009800525,0.000084410225,0.0000069668404,0.0046000425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98520815,0.0023705603,0.00024257027,0.00062888424,0.007768222,0.0037817052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9807701,0.009286664,0.0017154635,0.00034441362,0.006382807,0.0015004119],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008915592,0.00012707175,0.0005044816,0.004188842,0.01006081,0.010946369,0.0019189214,0.0035333803,0.0023286464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033503953,0.00033336488,0.00028848954,0.0062352847,0.012180142,0.0022448644,0.0012320383,0.0033571448,0.0002503113],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038146926,0.00009988529,0.08859193,0.00050213345,0.00025640707,0.0019523748,0.053091604,0.00072397356,0.0014210739,0.6802434,0.06931732,0.10341849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014706563,0.00012311498,0.59885013,0.001554531,0.0003181313,0.00052577094,0.11725522,0.00078488083,0.001121457,0.061884735,0.2171789,0.00025594136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93512064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9676175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06764929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06764929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.071139306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49083227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2868729165","doi":"10.1007/978-981-13-1023-2_1","title":"What Is Responsive Judging?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ius gentium","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Acknowledgement; Field (mathematics); Accountability; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics; Computer security","score_opus":0.03999780980906574,"score_gpt":0.3066927143896824,"score_spread":0.2666949045806166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2868729165","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028763174,0.009149626,0.0071811336,0.060999967,0.001857702,0.00002365846,0.0000462849,0.000057946134,0.9178074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6084196,0.010896326,0.0056508854,0.033742763,0.0049724593,0.00019297583,0.00011039655,0.0003650019,0.33564967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99176395,0.00416029,0.00020382437,0.0008679218,0.0024065021,0.0005975365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892702,0.007937835,0.00038633542,0.00090768223,0.0011286624,0.00036921276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075318986,0.00042601672,0.000821941,0.001507241,0.004615251,0.014833586,0.0017825578,0.004854949,0.013468137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021571077,0.00032210347,0.00029508848,0.0019355126,0.029615598,0.011294941,0.0022381735,0.00802004,0.0025183596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016810093,0.000003933866,0.000017732786,0.000016092421,9.3234206e-7,0.000008164821,0.00072572177,0.000024062736,0.000014970475,0.9817416,0.011304641,0.006140377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034006514,0.0000035973267,0.000100189536,0.0001351889,0.0000021667868,0.000014894857,0.0010124253,0.000103595004,0.00007963885,0.8691199,0.12941723,0.000007734974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074959863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00888466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014833586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063450066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058209253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046036422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883228411","doi":"10.2478/bjals-2019-0014","title":"“Felix Cohen Was the Blackstone of Federal Indian Law:” Taking the Comparison Seriously","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of American Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Jurisprudence; Law; Scholarship; Politics; Legal history; Civil servant; Legal education; Common law; Political science; Servant; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.025935630180175015,"score_gpt":0.3256007071614473,"score_spread":0.29966507698127226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883228411","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10208525,0.030182093,0.0032400084,0.4640107,0.0030509627,0.000028384233,0.00009309539,0.00004439188,0.3972652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9423615,0.003736571,0.00054809626,0.03215919,0.0011431125,0.000026126185,0.00002071331,0.000034540943,0.0199701],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99562705,0.0020158165,0.00006920065,0.000616273,0.0009046368,0.00076699926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928382,0.0045947693,0.00035772176,0.00029483915,0.0013845408,0.0005300365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005629136,0.00023446331,0.00040052805,0.0023682849,0.010830028,0.007911912,0.00075373414,0.0045838207,0.0032693397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013305264,0.0001667612,0.00017364013,0.0015753943,0.020549309,0.0072735674,0.0024611226,0.0060304943,0.00029396164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023637927,0.000010130418,0.0007967746,0.000019561632,0.000004440584,0.00008055937,0.012999591,0.000041526786,0.000061347506,0.95170796,0.027486745,0.0067677414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001902603,0.00004249792,0.0050738743,0.0005110274,0.000019079704,0.000307831,0.030667596,0.00024674294,0.0006132603,0.21976463,0.74266994,0.00006447543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048777647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05012049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048777647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012904196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007295937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09698743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885068581","doi":"10.1163/2211906x-00702004","title":"Canada and Israel in Comparative Constitutional Perspective: The (Sometimes Overlooked) Legal Historical Dimension of Globalization","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université Laval; Université de Montréal; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Constitutionalism; State (computer science); Politics; Political science; Federalism; Population; Democracy; Law; Political economy; Sociology","score_opus":0.029289094815552905,"score_gpt":0.3259439891792664,"score_spread":0.2966548943637135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885068581","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10178244,0.018784003,0.0023139555,0.041374665,0.0003595912,0.00004157841,0.0001944865,0.000036802932,0.83511245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9735338,0.005736436,0.00080085394,0.0036826036,0.00010815075,0.00003141842,0.00007235847,0.000033697404,0.016000614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99654454,0.0010658071,0.000037468693,0.00020913391,0.0008785407,0.0012645461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972493,0.0013811355,0.00015093999,0.0001109363,0.0007687833,0.0003387885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002893026,0.00031250765,0.0004636808,0.0037266817,0.021103874,0.013528126,0.0017793552,0.0030877215,0.0050735483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057064914,0.0001983186,0.00021522628,0.006075077,0.04596067,0.0042154496,0.0032923862,0.004114923,0.00016816298],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006154257,0.0000065746617,0.00051891746,0.000025342108,0.000003611341,0.000120756966,0.013239975,0.00018693235,0.000043412558,0.9781139,0.0035261998,0.0042083114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023557834,0.000024479408,0.012913569,0.000841077,0.00004825863,0.00035201153,0.1491906,0.0012044758,0.00050231506,0.23899418,0.595809,0.00009648877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9591606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9757479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14422989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14422989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09731148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.992572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885224434","doi":"","title":"LESSONS FROM LATIF: GUIDANCE ON THE USE OF SOCIAL SCIENCE EXPERT EVIDENCE IN DISCRIMINATION CASES","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Circumstantial evidence; Prima facie; Supreme court; Relevance (law); Spell; Respondent; Psychology; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.38240717373339045,"score_gpt":0.4173266072963282,"score_spread":0.03491943356293775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885224434","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0070471913,0.012704877,0.010361372,0.8877961,0.0029696855,0.00029605985,0.00031917598,0.00021492933,0.07829058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23461004,0.01786583,0.07095116,0.63644826,0.004173885,0.00048137957,0.00039386484,0.00033648362,0.034739174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.90600836,0.03622457,0.0077954787,0.0041570864,0.032303512,0.013510997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6598393,0.24147272,0.0048538647,0.0076396684,0.07812947,0.008064997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11029657,0.0017211033,0.0028784,0.009477957,0.02059548,0.021838233,0.010963625,0.041169036,0.0047062077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25877097,0.0019368432,0.0027669077,0.005378218,0.031842645,0.016349329,0.008761743,0.03609981,0.0014391204],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000086333814,0.00013388692,0.003526946,0.00061344646,0.00008967927,0.0020797981,0.01195779,0.0018287079,0.00060955156,0.5829052,0.3388633,0.05730537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025489298,0.00007588037,0.0033327036,0.0054861517,0.00016866502,0.0007066521,0.008027026,0.0036907436,0.0013057167,0.31708696,0.65943444,0.00043021477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7945406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90704805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7945406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0646807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2372008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58331096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885645251","doi":"","title":"Decision-Making in the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of New Brunswick Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.01821947210498014,"score_gpt":0.25327202656104153,"score_spread":0.23505255445606138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885645251","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3265493,0.007355811,0.0027041982,0.13369678,0.0010101728,0.00028217354,0.0011593866,0.00008729983,0.52715486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9390412,0.0012249033,0.0010744685,0.006398527,0.000099498444,0.000044599317,0.00012565049,0.00003927803,0.051951807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98517805,0.0023970346,0.00034888485,0.0013266401,0.0038463555,0.0069029327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818503,0.0071333703,0.00053623685,0.00044558698,0.006672539,0.0033620256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009108006,0.0005400229,0.001172211,0.0026939653,0.03656001,0.025376039,0.004072365,0.01018178,0.013928335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033602092,0.0009867953,0.00083480426,0.0044102347,0.01146135,0.003222835,0.0036729015,0.010719278,0.000792584],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020599266,0.00007825977,0.0078354655,0.00008998612,0.000116595045,0.00082884595,0.010952057,0.004610212,0.00037282027,0.8602176,0.0970036,0.017688572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042646454,0.00009389613,0.0335916,0.0008915527,0.0003999299,0.00020599489,0.046335366,0.018001229,0.0019060137,0.34616786,0.5513299,0.0006501939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.992816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99754876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21189128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21189128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3453086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9140944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885667638","doi":"","title":"Gender, consciousness raising, and decision making on the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judicature","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Raising (metalworking); Supreme court; Consciousness; Law; Political science; Supreme Court Decisions; Psychology; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.024224183832104854,"score_gpt":0.2892925316604149,"score_spread":0.26506834782831007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885667638","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49188906,0.0043994985,0.0012456599,0.076482944,0.00047504206,0.000090990616,0.00031486282,0.0000268717,0.4250751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812277,0.00047337989,0.00016737675,0.0026277485,0.000050953106,0.0000143376765,0.000021447448,0.000013382448,0.015403589],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910822,0.0017070562,0.00011261737,0.00066273985,0.0019699223,0.0044654505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98982567,0.0055132266,0.00037936287,0.00023304655,0.002591297,0.001457465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007254823,0.0003721948,0.00077954103,0.0018214033,0.039938923,0.014800614,0.0025957774,0.0062515596,0.011463344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021511337,0.00034742165,0.00044778682,0.0028851056,0.022628747,0.003089241,0.0037249012,0.008820179,0.00032865445],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011638652,0.00007220623,0.0065913815,0.000043056978,0.00004026578,0.00032714862,0.033310004,0.0008197941,0.00033299738,0.9203053,0.024626302,0.013415125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017783268,0.00010592659,0.05720259,0.00064000516,0.00026831278,0.00011383756,0.16920352,0.0033164027,0.0021202154,0.48181278,0.2847028,0.00033580544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97611165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9906844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86968416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13031584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19034523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.945512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886473766","doi":"10.1111/jels.12186","title":"A Rose by Any Other Name: Understanding Judicial Decisions that Do Not Cite Precedent","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"CITES; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Judicial opinion; Foundation (evidence); Phenomenon; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2462212841917908,"score_gpt":0.43611650463903234,"score_spread":0.18989522044724155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886473766","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5596365,0.0060296482,0.043972608,0.042963464,0.00037460722,0.00010149605,0.0005468332,0.000094584524,0.34628025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98923373,0.0010673335,0.0041211387,0.0010104467,0.000119634264,0.000026283822,0.00018158196,0.000034868655,0.004204992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941233,0.0031822422,0.00027092535,0.001043037,0.0009482113,0.0004323604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9471365,0.03779637,0.007630877,0.003307614,0.0031949624,0.00093368517],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009940241,0.00021014601,0.00053428556,0.0025183104,0.0034411883,0.008746484,0.0012647465,0.0023293365,0.0051102177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059626643,0.00027677364,0.00042474773,0.003473766,0.007834051,0.015646175,0.0023098213,0.0029927052,0.0008141168],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058016296,0.000092523136,0.029424766,0.00013235127,0.000035380464,0.00041055502,0.029427553,0.0017404514,0.00034763064,0.88241345,0.0039164512,0.052000847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002293512,0.00007363439,0.056484222,0.00065846916,0.00007099662,0.0003537692,0.022327738,0.013435366,0.0006519526,0.8142522,0.0915876,0.00008096964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015105184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021766145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9974817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036550767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052569628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886525649","doi":"10.29173/alr1433","title":"The Gifted Judge: An Analysis of the Judicial Career of Robert H. Jackson","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Civil liberties; Judicial review; Judicial activism; Doctrine; Democracy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.023169469039569474,"score_gpt":0.3018971805913199,"score_spread":0.27872771155175047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886525649","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10748785,0.03416845,0.0064069456,0.11508674,0.0013113017,0.000062953855,0.00005741807,0.000080975704,0.7353374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8860502,0.0104710525,0.0014111535,0.012849134,0.0008005623,0.00004404802,0.000028047642,0.000073464675,0.088272266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99580234,0.0021133628,0.0000731483,0.0002663502,0.0008072134,0.00093755993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99507195,0.0027788803,0.0004103008,0.00011632557,0.0008265535,0.00079592416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00501678,0.00016055975,0.0002466003,0.0028883545,0.008584958,0.0052810055,0.0009991674,0.003067739,0.0027054765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014353899,0.000192323,0.00020876243,0.0020436272,0.008691596,0.003051519,0.0020658358,0.0031131567,0.00043332714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001184595,0.00001937968,0.00042566354,0.00002268434,0.000002882225,0.00043354288,0.011137664,0.00017234302,0.00006732856,0.9576349,0.019437945,0.010633757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021440906,0.000047495294,0.0048152157,0.000347934,0.000015168252,0.0005418541,0.011693656,0.00067295687,0.00023427885,0.1753047,0.8062475,0.000057872894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028261894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04002827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028261894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0089520775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069474136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064952195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886663949","doi":"","title":"Judicial Attitudes to Judicial Review: A Comparative Examination of Justifications Offered for Restricting the Scope of Judicial Review in Australia, Canada and England","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Judicial review; Scope (computer science); Vitality; Judicial activism; Political science; Law; Judicial opinion","score_opus":0.051672408473930974,"score_gpt":0.36101925479880553,"score_spread":0.3093468463248746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886663949","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8997178,0.0033354654,0.0002795577,0.008562112,0.000076995246,0.00006631755,0.000046608722,0.000009778547,0.08790536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99409205,0.0012268322,0.00009613572,0.0009212717,0.00002083998,0.000014569171,0.000012079765,0.000007304652,0.0036089066],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97661555,0.0071823285,0.0007339187,0.0007727391,0.01057517,0.0041202866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9492437,0.023152042,0.0057856455,0.0009019787,0.015874652,0.005041933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012058646,0.00013983728,0.00048922416,0.0033558768,0.010352009,0.0066415183,0.0014852597,0.0016901643,0.003263121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056118213,0.00037752508,0.00026605112,0.0048183515,0.011206501,0.0013178398,0.0029697008,0.002782274,0.00017624247],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005975255,0.0002718357,0.10975188,0.0008471239,0.000157116,0.0031092477,0.54703987,0.0012557862,0.0028539996,0.23295899,0.015804473,0.08535215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001040014,0.00015960734,0.7293211,0.0009294577,0.00010461296,0.00044445865,0.17124538,0.00094630034,0.0006018981,0.005998441,0.08997817,0.00016653806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8383157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93500555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16168427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05636115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039389513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40893072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887302706","doi":"10.29173/alr1438","title":"Special Issue on Judicial Appointments - Introduction","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Government; Strong; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.01912355025449905,"score_gpt":0.30007410492534775,"score_spread":0.28095055467084873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887302706","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015821866,0.106974036,0.00091391255,0.111530825,0.48005491,0.00044674717,0.0041411123,0.0005025352,0.29385367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009694619,0.04333305,0.000899729,0.06951449,0.24089083,0.0003173267,0.0028446473,0.0003763111,0.63212913],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99545187,0.00046736642,0.00028529434,0.00050076016,0.0024416726,0.0008531037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879873,0.003448435,0.00051668694,0.0007857252,0.005964516,0.0012973272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004783485,0.0015973762,0.0023555972,0.011647827,0.004780276,0.0086856,0.0034633114,0.011711368,0.08293444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010048289,0.001043129,0.0013390873,0.008268778,0.0031635915,0.0036883594,0.0021788906,0.00675892,0.022792948],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011934809,0.000027084538,0.000089794325,0.00014144114,0.0000034415773,0.000021639606,0.0000318753,0.00003777543,0.00006791826,0.0041409656,0.9862694,0.009156728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010853536,0.00001832049,0.002009421,0.0004197951,0.000013174741,0.000025280031,0.00007171619,0.000043969696,0.000054458164,0.002407843,0.9949121,0.000013146526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12085024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35308614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98732364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012676372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01733676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27744335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888075018","doi":"10.1017/s0008423918000434","title":"Judicial Discretion as Political Choice: The Supreme Court of Canada's Costs Awarding Power","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Discretion; Politics; Economic Justice; Power (physics); Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Economics; Business","score_opus":0.018854971755263364,"score_gpt":0.3060579583647822,"score_spread":0.2872029866095189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888075018","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55340123,0.0055425996,0.0021715567,0.058575798,0.00023124157,0.00006540208,0.0012764467,0.000046122565,0.3786896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99550396,0.000360621,0.00012499759,0.0008941728,0.000042540454,0.000003427886,0.000051923053,0.000007253783,0.0030110704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98807317,0.00113512,0.00022342634,0.000805535,0.005740061,0.0040227366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9635888,0.016821545,0.004265167,0.0010441034,0.009516117,0.004764245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056925723,0.00015192563,0.00062291644,0.003935121,0.010495141,0.011100448,0.0014720892,0.00226432,0.006355706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034944527,0.00029989955,0.0003399218,0.00545232,0.010879439,0.0020382088,0.0019666567,0.003738708,0.00023515779],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018892334,0.00008042247,0.12895806,0.00011297191,0.00012718211,0.0008034255,0.016402112,0.0044348454,0.00093980675,0.75996083,0.03778959,0.05020184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011670469,0.000084615174,0.6147303,0.00070703076,0.00021194735,0.00025339963,0.019349843,0.0074789724,0.0012776832,0.10601786,0.24939194,0.00037967067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9773233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9881919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91148424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.088515736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08902277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6422296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888288850","doi":"10.1016/j.postcomstud.2018.06.002","title":"Authoritarian constitutionalism in Putin’s Russia: A pragmatic constitutional court in a dual state","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communist and Post-Communist Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Authoritarianism; Constitutional court; Law; State (computer science); Political science; Dual (grammatical number); Subordination (linguistics); Politics; Autonomy; Constitutional law; Sociology; Law and economics; Democracy; Constitution; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.040466349490957926,"score_gpt":0.34570135322573303,"score_spread":0.3052350037347751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888288850","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57333714,0.0019763648,0.022136431,0.020945363,0.0004859977,0.00013915233,0.00006504534,0.000059068207,0.3808554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99513596,0.00008220067,0.0011030049,0.0004711898,0.00003651583,0.00002732688,0.000006490591,0.000005285184,0.0031318967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922042,0.004911415,0.00022432923,0.0006557784,0.0010964733,0.0009078119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824095,0.0009346965,0.00023318193,0.00021949876,0.00021096712,0.00016059836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069253207,0.00017515503,0.00043195378,0.0009349073,0.00715244,0.0082180565,0.0007713612,0.0029626838,0.0009964197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006113882,0.00028470624,0.0004975918,0.0007781442,0.017411482,0.0029031052,0.005164406,0.0041090823,0.00013223123],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007019696,0.000006234433,0.00025308796,0.0000074143118,0.0000034979405,0.0001479869,0.0025619965,0.00033436264,0.00016555577,0.99525553,0.0002987673,0.00095857825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000107555315,0.000111777765,0.00410229,0.0001407496,0.000031619486,0.0003452802,0.007476503,0.0046327733,0.001219138,0.9001819,0.08157653,0.00007377464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009495871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012950549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009495871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008224234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063807736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059671283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889205059","doi":"","title":"ARABS, MUSLIMS, HUMAN RIGHTS, ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND INSTITUTIONAL TRUSTWORTHINESS: INSIGHTS FROM THIRTEEN LEGAL NARRATIVES","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Narrative; International human rights law; Sociology","score_opus":0.05362550134991011,"score_gpt":0.3380005040823064,"score_spread":0.2843750027323963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889205059","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92187417,0.0024787092,0.00038867127,0.009920989,0.00003830093,0.00004332215,0.00007819322,0.000004459943,0.065173104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955397,0.0012208562,0.00012932601,0.00040764347,0.00000893764,0.000009538589,0.000022545619,0.0000051614206,0.00265627],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99713093,0.0012279594,0.00008393176,0.00015598514,0.00066340424,0.0007377994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989151,0.007337959,0.000974362,0.0002481501,0.0013382616,0.0009502774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066299518,0.00030507482,0.00033453206,0.0025287708,0.026329743,0.009814946,0.0013699346,0.0016621968,0.0021466876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010429553,0.00028163666,0.00012645974,0.0035884038,0.025149949,0.0032321266,0.0040897415,0.0035023103,0.00012282253],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017315751,0.000017949695,0.0067742085,0.00004588203,0.0000038069338,0.00033869714,0.9369321,0.000054293814,0.00011592582,0.048846707,0.001971627,0.004881465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025589877,0.0000042186193,0.0049661146,0.00011653799,0.0000044662884,0.000044701592,0.97179675,0.00007160536,0.00007264966,0.0021322137,0.02077808,0.000010079199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78827274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90483034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21172726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034206245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03758793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42594832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889272343","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0033","title":"The hydraulics of constitutional claims: Multiplicity of actors in constitutional interpretation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional theory; Democracy; Political science; Sociology; Constitutional law; Law; Meaning (existential); Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Epistemology; History","score_opus":0.014521814287404579,"score_gpt":0.2579335399891207,"score_spread":0.24341172570171615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889272343","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2130958,0.0062236576,0.17260346,0.122772306,0.00049306836,0.0002470739,0.00010706363,0.0003055719,0.48415205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881136,0.00045502963,0.006929053,0.0010544761,0.0002028351,0.000123339,0.00001907284,0.00007081812,0.0030318694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.92661464,0.048362225,0.0025579499,0.0063968757,0.010449999,0.0056183683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9088785,0.07315365,0.0045163566,0.0077322656,0.0028735138,0.0028457951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.061979465,0.00059006276,0.001762159,0.006407572,0.02556105,0.03533091,0.0037247492,0.009706509,0.0064963466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.072130874,0.0019578582,0.0013167666,0.0041564847,0.16754411,0.053252213,0.027066728,0.012485213,0.00060644496],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009590688,0.000006165114,0.0006777934,0.000018412848,0.000007453026,0.00014928458,0.024696978,0.00018970258,0.00008188566,0.9703395,0.00035257364,0.0034706462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030163996,0.000014438199,0.00065018825,0.00012386276,0.00002232256,0.00013195173,0.016327089,0.0010733637,0.00023894741,0.962372,0.018974539,0.000041104915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014572796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0116634555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061979465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021301933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01529076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32778263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890117492","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv360npz6.13","title":"Political Functions and Limitations of Contemporary State Constitutions in the United States","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Politics; Political science; Law and economics; Theoretical physics; Law; Political economy; Sociology; Physics; Computer science; Algorithm","score_opus":0.07941770574216818,"score_gpt":0.25510268361149685,"score_spread":0.17568497786932868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890117492","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05568451,0.014204613,0.0028587175,0.018732445,0.00022039512,0.000014008356,0.00008295131,0.00006872991,0.90813357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9303985,0.0058456543,0.0013005037,0.0018309258,0.00011038684,0.000045488658,0.000067162895,0.000027111326,0.06037428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984933,0.0007887523,0.000034214896,0.00011536378,0.0003181319,0.00025029207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983209,0.0010414359,0.00008068819,0.00017129337,0.00031559504,0.00007005652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022699751,0.00013975835,0.00019116008,0.001050629,0.004842116,0.006440418,0.00061768584,0.00083990593,0.0039801183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035940465,0.00020732054,0.00014559564,0.0016983463,0.0116751855,0.0019992553,0.0010937753,0.0019254239,0.00026516555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004117881,0.0000036189142,0.00020289412,0.000019371235,0.0000016035435,0.00003029112,0.0031058094,0.00031858202,0.00010182872,0.97681034,0.003932275,0.015469309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017646174,0.000022844493,0.008633944,0.00054859475,0.000025170892,0.000096063304,0.0091019515,0.0022548963,0.00049985334,0.31539184,0.663371,0.000036191577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29394162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.52527654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29394162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017062983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009118202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58446133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890844950","doi":"","title":"Misrepresenting the Supreme Court's Record? A Comment on Sujit Choudhry and Claire E. Hunter, \"Measuring Judicial Activism on the Supreme Court of Canada\"","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Judicial activism; Judicial review","score_opus":0.05152245062291007,"score_gpt":0.26822321045992514,"score_spread":0.2167007598370151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890844950","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0051914477,0.0024327615,0.0005619172,0.97517043,0.0020576334,0.0000198946,0.00046729247,0.000041847776,0.014056776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.102772675,0.0026354755,0.00095606106,0.8745089,0.00782143,0.00008541856,0.00021651959,0.00011531402,0.010888182],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9547042,0.014405095,0.0019999493,0.004016063,0.021123374,0.0037512176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8321875,0.12335271,0.008079725,0.004045605,0.028833475,0.0035010357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039961603,0.00072597293,0.0015753673,0.003942833,0.016910283,0.015475703,0.008992701,0.03695503,0.0041814256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17126,0.0011115437,0.0012600932,0.008326532,0.020125683,0.010226125,0.0039673094,0.030692637,0.0018989949],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006021793,0.000026511978,0.0043008775,0.00010982896,0.00005352135,0.00025575235,0.012949373,0.00015503379,0.00017985042,0.08603713,0.8848519,0.011020163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012037843,0.000068455854,0.026153238,0.0022162413,0.0003383229,0.0003424964,0.03782163,0.0013909754,0.002813713,0.06641209,0.8619369,0.00038543364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.52436715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71313995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47563285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01911686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03090903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9568679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891388505","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198794356.013.13","title":"Legal History As The History of Legal Texts","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Casebook; Deference; Law; Legal writing; Legal history; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Literature; Political science; History; Legal research; Art","score_opus":0.03423799146259209,"score_gpt":0.2191489708567455,"score_spread":0.1849109793941534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891388505","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055277897,0.032127306,0.0020808675,0.020012459,0.0017750115,0.000023241068,0.00011123586,0.00007373722,0.93826824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53819484,0.028262395,0.0021860204,0.004610357,0.0031192543,0.00010847505,0.00023903631,0.00023452229,0.4230451],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997924,0.0011162806,0.00007674059,0.00022829264,0.00050261355,0.0001521324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99522495,0.003318196,0.00027985172,0.00038873169,0.00052450236,0.00026368277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020064428,0.00030972928,0.0002834039,0.0042069633,0.005201691,0.01417975,0.00087706535,0.0017012681,0.020761456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005554019,0.0002902732,0.00013936473,0.0031364562,0.024759125,0.010717149,0.0025443172,0.0032056903,0.002136323],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029995083,0.0000043958717,0.000042320447,0.00004267308,9.927713e-7,0.00004007248,0.0064629004,0.00005238382,0.000043866607,0.9680397,0.013930141,0.0113375895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030633728,0.0000064177834,0.00018481402,0.00044130135,0.0000021304159,0.000052326282,0.0042983065,0.000071644485,0.00012274936,0.1618248,0.83298725,0.0000053108065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059091523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008731184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020761456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0102780955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005578415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0745731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891432583","doi":"10.4324/9781351201834-5","title":"Exploring constitutional statutes in common law systems","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Constitutionality; Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Jurisprudence; Constitution","score_opus":0.05113832973031576,"score_gpt":0.2844327519446946,"score_spread":0.23329442221437882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891432583","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32815757,0.007192147,0.12987757,0.02840297,0.00018455015,0.000190723,0.00028700926,0.00013016924,0.5055774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98979366,0.0007344806,0.006556164,0.0002637147,0.00007475272,0.000084444604,0.00006552825,0.000015559486,0.0024116996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98961395,0.0070821396,0.00038698525,0.0006969522,0.0013076356,0.000912379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9797372,0.016168917,0.001606807,0.0010739614,0.0009817353,0.00043124383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008295206,0.00025152086,0.00046802993,0.0065123015,0.006248204,0.011210042,0.0012890459,0.002594774,0.0036690736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017597578,0.0004014642,0.0006042456,0.009117988,0.04838998,0.015200707,0.006008563,0.0032663606,0.00028038947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.818028e-7,0.0000023373684,0.00015687635,0.0000045188726,7.663025e-7,0.0000065616914,0.00075677567,0.00017616649,0.000009001785,0.998206,0.000032707612,0.0006475426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004754965,0.000006604335,0.0006133313,0.000037575664,0.0000032390562,0.000013397901,0.0019249724,0.0011522342,0.00004459732,0.9890887,0.0071053905,0.000005118701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010498721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069869324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0116085615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0116085615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066075446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08422637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891851733","doi":"10.1089/elj.2018.0520","title":"Beyond Party Financing: The Rise of Political Ethics Regulation in Canada and France","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Politics; Legislature; Political science; Language change; Compromise; Public administration; Campaign finance; Government (linguistics); Political economy; Enforcement; Legislation; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.02002488011239611,"score_gpt":0.309651125580348,"score_spread":0.2896262454679519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891851733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6951114,0.011628185,0.0022774655,0.0983273,0.00046071707,0.00011808329,0.00044302124,0.00014798637,0.19148582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96379894,0.001302212,0.00056653214,0.0040459814,0.00009485063,0.000025071677,0.00008599494,0.000032930242,0.030047491],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878758,0.0022961886,0.00019270522,0.0012840382,0.003930208,0.0044209617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98236245,0.0050726198,0.0019301762,0.00066029176,0.0062387567,0.0037357544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071147187,0.0002547158,0.00047191756,0.003471494,0.018288713,0.012744918,0.001267149,0.0036729574,0.0039520985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015676718,0.000397404,0.00055862765,0.0039994707,0.009300834,0.0023997484,0.002297492,0.0041934373,0.0002509479],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003591559,0.0002168664,0.1013707,0.00020160957,0.00010712858,0.0022740988,0.08247665,0.002135271,0.00225869,0.65451187,0.038598046,0.11549008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000644379,0.00011186683,0.30961782,0.00033464076,0.00005970369,0.00043755138,0.034573905,0.0020540885,0.0019234276,0.0074853357,0.6431022,0.00023505666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98306376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.988677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81855047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18144956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14813274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9494025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892250763","doi":"","title":"Review of 'Institutionalized Reason: The Jurisprudence of Robert Alexy', Matthias Klatt, Ed. (Oxford University Press, 2012)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Jurisprudence; Morality; Law; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.011371098257077153,"score_gpt":0.26043173220057025,"score_spread":0.2490606339434931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892250763","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019949646,0.95037633,0.000557043,0.02739606,0.009447797,0.000010964825,0.000045476165,0.000026158885,0.011940646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0048318817,0.9543581,0.0006549136,0.009240909,0.00968576,0.000046275603,0.00011997302,0.000062351144,0.02099978],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970419,0.0008104357,0.00018288034,0.00027520434,0.0015329187,0.00015661423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934144,0.003793578,0.00048020165,0.00020166283,0.0018147058,0.00029539032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024398004,0.00073442346,0.0014552744,0.004112516,0.0018511148,0.006262289,0.0010798532,0.002732119,0.004550689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008827373,0.00079580344,0.00050950167,0.006285621,0.0048750197,0.005117064,0.001653539,0.0053665373,0.00408545],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012343425,0.000009998316,0.00008381649,0.001607988,0.00001447684,0.00005763283,0.0008851705,0.00014170639,0.000088111105,0.03196459,0.8829702,0.08216393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018610781,0.0000048299994,0.00028507548,0.0016333262,0.0000041462336,0.00007421541,0.00022261808,0.000021080543,0.000031131975,0.0025322565,0.9951827,0.000006868553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011924771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018154178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011924771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052657756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012492457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03820604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894311746","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjy034","title":"The Canadian Reference Power: Delegation to the Courts and the Navigation of Federalism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Delegate; Delegation; Political science; Politics; Power (physics); Government (linguistics); Public administration; Law and economics; New Federalism; Blame; Law; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.02384343397391637,"score_gpt":0.2908756696374878,"score_spread":0.2670322356635714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894311746","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67589766,0.00308158,0.003813155,0.018427102,0.00013980463,0.00012596192,0.007987607,0.000075626434,0.2904515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99195004,0.00049960735,0.0006518684,0.0004169297,0.000020417167,0.000015416656,0.000769906,0.000022609487,0.0056532966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99250185,0.0012339044,0.0002188366,0.00077648566,0.0034333454,0.0018354254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97085637,0.009728466,0.004757055,0.0016101614,0.011439258,0.0016086727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005025194,0.00014815656,0.00042005617,0.0050049573,0.007553948,0.0067655877,0.0015482936,0.00090770837,0.009283254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043476533,0.00017877856,0.00024047728,0.012587573,0.00624837,0.0020454535,0.0023926857,0.0016076595,0.00037721894],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016819313,0.000051957868,0.35109192,0.00026495365,0.00008388402,0.00071591,0.065819606,0.0024389606,0.00054108875,0.39862418,0.083498076,0.09670131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025494215,0.00002283766,0.5863254,0.00057134294,0.00010303714,0.0001512155,0.06555949,0.0034935672,0.0007474,0.02869953,0.31415904,0.0001417027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9842271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9925988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059571113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059571113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06366022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43222076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894764957","doi":"","title":"Judicial Review and Contemporary Democratic Theory: Power, Domination, and the Courts","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Judicial review; Veto; Politics; Law; Political science; Judicial activism; Context (archaeology); Constitutional review; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Opposition (politics); Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.026085343618850825,"score_gpt":0.30101373343551335,"score_spread":0.2749283898166625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894764957","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048025786,0.110139,0.009641605,0.092995286,0.0028503672,0.000051645213,0.000053893178,0.00006387193,0.7794018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43188173,0.10289692,0.0064002364,0.032457747,0.012745951,0.00021397305,0.00013657378,0.0001830823,0.41308376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99451125,0.0022352121,0.00014257972,0.0004059844,0.0022549788,0.00044986658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99346054,0.004748952,0.00033194455,0.00036698996,0.0008312955,0.00026028825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00449091,0.00032718855,0.00047313783,0.0015909343,0.0048623662,0.010623488,0.0010788614,0.0027382618,0.005352669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009886836,0.00029365072,0.00030800546,0.002582073,0.017501585,0.0070814323,0.0021607617,0.004652336,0.0012428404],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024633093,0.000004747229,0.000038171278,0.000028041646,0.0000017346244,0.0000136645685,0.0008832153,0.00011222832,0.000024381623,0.96005255,0.028124359,0.010714551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006876428,0.000006618359,0.00021189787,0.00014976982,0.0000024437559,0.000029175346,0.0004744887,0.00021185384,0.00006353798,0.6219014,0.3769349,0.000007063074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004748854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077141053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010623488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007018499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008592522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05092293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895430193","doi":"10.1017/s0008423918000732","title":"Stability and Change: Policy Evolution on the Supreme Court of Canada, 1945–2005","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Scholarship; Political science; Civil liberties; Law; Civil rights; Politics","score_opus":0.050924240759695295,"score_gpt":0.30002955800907194,"score_spread":0.24910531724937665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895430193","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91806483,0.005301492,0.00046369265,0.027456336,0.000115016766,0.0000667339,0.0044726925,0.000036689486,0.044022493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99484235,0.0006897189,0.00011913561,0.00045617594,0.000033701468,0.0000060751427,0.00048591685,0.000005923296,0.003361046],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947556,0.00036627354,0.00013124311,0.00047502408,0.001971688,0.0023000895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9846407,0.0016674894,0.0022508402,0.00024955216,0.008121144,0.0030702688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003175228,0.00018421107,0.0003961354,0.005634199,0.0069586504,0.006914609,0.001763661,0.0014335255,0.004352508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015497011,0.0002684524,0.00033936213,0.009853224,0.004126211,0.0013546938,0.0015866364,0.0019356903,0.00022985709],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003916336,0.00024773576,0.6831114,0.0002533126,0.00028884603,0.0008603725,0.029531524,0.0067838314,0.0014808639,0.124869704,0.047536463,0.10464436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011087508,0.000029586712,0.9367948,0.00013002582,0.000033386517,0.000048578346,0.00992948,0.0015447203,0.00040628057,0.0014583168,0.049569942,0.000043894954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99594206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99728906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21619159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21619159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13801341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9091067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895460886","doi":"10.1017/s1352325218000113","title":"REASONING BY PRECEDENT—BETWEEN RULES AND ANALOGIES","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Analogical reasoning; Discretion; Argument (complex analysis); Defeasible reasoning; Process (computing); Deductive reasoning; Epistemology; Case-based reasoning; Computer science; Law; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019677710353878063,"score_gpt":0.3037214548208461,"score_spread":0.28404374446696806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895460886","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15043041,0.004753199,0.49536395,0.02855323,0.0009674084,0.00030899275,0.00030742522,0.00049180456,0.3188236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.930495,0.00082300865,0.06236322,0.0012992626,0.00031139047,0.00008194846,0.00012258485,0.00006413857,0.004439416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97427976,0.015744857,0.0014543975,0.0032264402,0.0043109097,0.0009837258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9303079,0.056018542,0.0029939436,0.0069251996,0.0031283218,0.0006261783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02692246,0.00047220738,0.0010140811,0.0031156763,0.0023269043,0.0090897605,0.003318325,0.004633829,0.011042933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.075008094,0.0006573366,0.0018162888,0.00156278,0.02217037,0.023634698,0.0036257333,0.0053144936,0.0011246551],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027725477,0.000022092201,0.00033320094,0.000053527132,0.000020123332,0.00011065692,0.0007196292,0.001466961,0.00014706007,0.9899312,0.0007901738,0.006377648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020497482,0.000009000473,0.0001499899,0.000047031688,0.000008742006,0.000052389543,0.00014486752,0.0030135524,0.00029243235,0.9925212,0.00372754,0.000012667405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024028006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001651518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02692246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035373834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025489137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14238131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897181300","doi":"10.1093/icon/moy022","title":"Unstable Constitutionalism—Law and Politics in South Asia","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Politics; Political science; Law; Democracy","score_opus":0.025541900413855054,"score_gpt":0.3169803067568737,"score_spread":0.29143840634301865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897181300","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18789539,0.034906037,0.0044942354,0.07643407,0.0004799809,0.000042198135,0.00008016365,0.00005090339,0.695617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9784409,0.007905524,0.0008178671,0.0033055255,0.00018594705,0.000052700725,0.000035236328,0.00003706566,0.009219333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811685,0.0009640849,0.00010412101,0.00020720309,0.00027162407,0.00033609665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99757546,0.0015343343,0.00027702044,0.00026108333,0.00016270136,0.00018948498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00396932,0.00029029947,0.00032234984,0.0018717544,0.010072495,0.011706221,0.00073969807,0.0014555986,0.0031354153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030870729,0.00026122842,0.00025377405,0.0037398767,0.031287562,0.008733178,0.0075117545,0.0051613706,0.00026304036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066486427,0.0000069523985,0.0007363811,0.00005787969,0.0000033340416,0.00016714791,0.04627111,0.000067900866,0.00015456133,0.94613385,0.0012036784,0.005190507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015468475,0.000033431254,0.0046322104,0.00061574014,0.000012409926,0.0003805263,0.06745372,0.00032863097,0.0005388907,0.685,0.24096562,0.00002339279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006541666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068160323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011706221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008219328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007828756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0596357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898060614","doi":"10.29173/alr2498","title":"Novel Uses of the Charter Following Doré and Loyola","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Statutory law; Duty; Law; Constitutionalism; State (computer science); Government (linguistics); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Democracy; Philosophy; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.03600915420637599,"score_gpt":0.31414109384867095,"score_spread":0.278131939642295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898060614","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043272223,0.013694831,0.0443051,0.19621609,0.0028454333,0.00029662665,0.00037317481,0.00019617785,0.6988004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82587415,0.003516632,0.013345943,0.029724635,0.00065197883,0.0003104777,0.00009080248,0.00007840095,0.12640703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99392265,0.0019464539,0.00019605858,0.0009959535,0.0020457155,0.0008930322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934012,0.0040013203,0.00035576144,0.0004264885,0.0016215041,0.00019358912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005907486,0.00033443095,0.0002961866,0.001100233,0.007932446,0.0068824575,0.0012267535,0.0036090587,0.0022373344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0135212755,0.00027276194,0.00034831808,0.0012462314,0.024198994,0.0039998014,0.0024486284,0.008758957,0.00031350943],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033875008,0.000003432017,0.00009751639,0.000009220466,8.305656e-7,0.000023858207,0.0027240356,0.000041634103,0.000041063704,0.9873029,0.006712087,0.0030400222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028273482,0.00003203622,0.0017056657,0.00021758366,0.000014352224,0.0001375762,0.004813979,0.00053465273,0.0009463195,0.27545807,0.71603835,0.000073208306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26219913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3706359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73780084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021273943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021873375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.521346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898385144","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12354","title":"<i>Law and Revolution: Legitimacy and Constitutionalism After the Arab Spring.</i> By Nimer Sultany. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Legitimacy; Citation; Law; Political science; Sociology; Media studies; Classics; History; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.01960913537046508,"score_gpt":0.2630031266161097,"score_spread":0.24339399124564462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898385144","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008284956,0.8058553,0.00041125857,0.14142254,0.0099241575,0.000009231895,0.00016519627,0.000023787683,0.041359965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14530458,0.6632346,0.0011882728,0.059783142,0.022542499,0.00009638342,0.0005543051,0.00015320517,0.10714301],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873,0.0007032308,0.00006672112,0.00011381273,0.0002519374,0.00013436723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820566,0.0011089019,0.00016930778,0.000101235186,0.00032525338,0.000089663925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015970758,0.00094448053,0.00044690885,0.0024777988,0.0030546102,0.0053070197,0.00063849066,0.0041722013,0.009486448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046728696,0.00039058615,0.00044694653,0.0032600793,0.006773221,0.0086187,0.0019479061,0.0041015553,0.0023459217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038240887,0.000014571886,0.00032033946,0.00044790772,0.000015387808,0.00007942626,0.0014706687,0.00011311938,0.000096432625,0.17406617,0.7787302,0.044607528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011175598,0.000012590313,0.0015719383,0.0015083327,0.00000925671,0.00012312889,0.0019712988,0.00009644389,0.00018382561,0.07916995,0.91532534,0.00001671407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0141253695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033937242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0141253695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003885565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003227081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0317353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899667883","doi":"","title":"Parliamentary Committees: Types, Powers andPerformance Order (Canadian experience)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Political science; Computer science; Law; Business","score_opus":0.08976508967498635,"score_gpt":0.3284317285611358,"score_spread":0.23866663888614942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899667883","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71212775,0.0066504,0.00070245203,0.014289504,0.00027142573,0.00019217677,0.0013002617,0.000073379604,0.2643926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8864519,0.0040310654,0.0006675129,0.00076840265,0.00003626414,0.000031738076,0.0003366729,0.000052164116,0.10762427],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99432594,0.0009941964,0.00017267844,0.00040058492,0.002206773,0.0018997899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907268,0.0026428916,0.00059168355,0.00027655758,0.003451026,0.002311015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043129534,0.0002901426,0.00039982115,0.0029892568,0.028097268,0.006273968,0.0015825154,0.0017821463,0.015931094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014387494,0.00052865903,0.00030272047,0.008372124,0.006652573,0.0022775128,0.0023383475,0.002355743,0.0010616498],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036132868,0.0003598236,0.081065685,0.00027320182,0.000030716423,0.0013595648,0.48287424,0.00058313156,0.0010080065,0.1254024,0.10768869,0.19899324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033176933,0.000076019285,0.20904791,0.00025597386,0.000041231713,0.000538352,0.23297712,0.00025232823,0.0008491493,0.002024389,0.55380106,0.00010326235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9930668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09437071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09437071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14674437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6847106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900123666","doi":"10.11144/javeriana.upsy17-4.fvpc","title":"French and Venezuelan People’s Conceptualization of Human Rights: Indivisibility and Universality Issues","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Universitas Psychologica","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université TÉLUQ","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Universality (dynamical systems); Civil liberties; Human rights; Politics; Sociology; Inequality; Social psychology; Political science; Law; Psychology; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03491920915228045,"score_gpt":0.34147802529990356,"score_spread":0.3065588161476231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900123666","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9822124,0.001403842,0.00050541415,0.0013291732,0.00002208944,0.000012485224,0.000024651483,0.0000028161455,0.014487045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99912864,0.00020001874,0.00008151522,0.00009744918,0.000004945037,0.0000058906176,0.0000084791645,9.0477204e-7,0.00047199603],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966627,0.0021965273,0.00008510771,0.000204999,0.00037894215,0.00047175382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99736696,0.0016423558,0.0004661549,0.00011064117,0.0002473047,0.0001666002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056894748,0.00033216857,0.00024853062,0.0015456893,0.0028966155,0.0038041454,0.0003883472,0.0006628392,0.002942986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007495444,0.00012837502,0.00024885545,0.0009311563,0.0060994322,0.0020546694,0.001698381,0.0011148147,0.00008192198],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015438211,0.0000723974,0.080677755,0.00016272215,0.00003722902,0.0005625106,0.8537899,0.00023390481,0.002292472,0.03767482,0.0009320676,0.02340992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020608912,0.00012262125,0.15702696,0.00034606628,0.000025638474,0.000740157,0.8034448,0.0005498895,0.00036142717,0.004080188,0.033237677,0.00004408471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14279519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08892378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14279519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005909427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014558779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2839281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900516636","doi":"10.1177/0097700418811072","title":"Political Resources and Divergent Court Empowerment in China: A Subnational Comparison","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern China","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Politics; Empowerment; China; Political science; Socioeconomic status; Democracy; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.023933543303641502,"score_gpt":0.31528618417311316,"score_spread":0.29135264086947166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900516636","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99774605,0.00003337969,0.000034821576,0.000060875398,0.0000011966295,0.0000055765186,0.000010473487,7.5615566e-7,0.0021068412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997931,0.000017900393,0.000020683488,0.000014449982,9.3207734e-7,0.0000039122983,0.000016561804,5.3301744e-7,0.00013183655],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826175,0.0004268388,0.00010503539,0.0002729081,0.00030045153,0.00063296617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979401,0.00050453376,0.00063407945,0.00023671085,0.000313194,0.0003712807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018729825,0.00022774302,0.0004539309,0.0028511307,0.0029772143,0.0014819674,0.0005687437,0.00030357335,0.002855653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031342292,0.0001274303,0.000311984,0.0027540093,0.0036405378,0.0014265548,0.0033553124,0.0006125123,0.000086716194],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032693517,0.00038563175,0.8109048,0.000089280016,0.0001818459,0.00133092,0.09774002,0.0007501262,0.0023966478,0.051216602,0.00055997743,0.034117218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028332095,0.00010803861,0.9601588,0.000026291265,0.00005539954,0.00012176754,0.033214536,0.001156825,0.0003398764,0.0029547142,0.0018147852,0.000020694388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038007885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0786368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038007885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036003636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00271442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075573325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900519741","doi":"10.1017/als.2018.35","title":"The Political Origins of Professional Identity: Lawyers, Judges, and Prosecutors in Taiwan’s State Transformation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Identity (music); State (computer science); Politics; Legal profession; Authoritarianism; Political science; Power (physics); Democratization; Economic Justice; Sociology; Independence (probability theory); Democracy","score_opus":0.0159454842176147,"score_gpt":0.31418128497809733,"score_spread":0.2982358007604826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900519741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879424,0.00011506995,0.00015950638,0.0016796634,0.00000879552,0.000005188392,0.0000032807584,0.0000017138881,0.010084302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993668,0.000021580317,0.00002167501,0.000041319363,0.0000024444296,0.0000020548875,0.0000019123434,6.6409893e-7,0.00054145866],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984048,0.0008248653,0.00004474622,0.00014343555,0.00015559599,0.00042655223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99683785,0.0014435395,0.00061483297,0.00011266172,0.00036214036,0.0006290122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021871128,0.00008870761,0.0001490481,0.0015646555,0.0073951553,0.005740601,0.0004477623,0.0010978025,0.0023406635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046720114,0.00022284535,0.000089272595,0.0012005441,0.0077804695,0.0019973076,0.0033437824,0.001754937,0.0001395916],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025237745,0.000060200153,0.05264697,0.00001698621,0.00000274914,0.001360327,0.9051494,0.000058099344,0.0005895001,0.03059687,0.00070637645,0.008787292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006578438,0.000027812934,0.045383755,0.00006431018,0.0000035016042,0.00020306688,0.9393002,0.00039760862,0.00023671676,0.003946346,0.010415057,0.000015083935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01952415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0349361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01952415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004066857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038708115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03882104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900691003","doi":"","title":"Vigilance and Restraint in the Common Law of Judicial Review: Introduction","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Judicial review; Law; Judgement; Judicial opinion; Commonwealth; Normative; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.013551723111018049,"score_gpt":0.30230386448776747,"score_spread":0.2887521413767494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900691003","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010170815,0.21250668,0.041088596,0.05895617,0.010235087,0.00035587893,0.0002902113,0.00017988826,0.66621673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37909082,0.28684285,0.04367361,0.037806593,0.03320758,0.0012934849,0.0006006699,0.00031560435,0.21716876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996507,0.0019937484,0.00012662863,0.00028776887,0.00082269154,0.00026219228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953113,0.0035079503,0.00021941002,0.00022555597,0.0005699863,0.00016587737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032774531,0.0005857337,0.00069505064,0.0020309822,0.0019679365,0.008366916,0.0013779385,0.0036187358,0.0044788285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007672352,0.0005626968,0.000509347,0.0030855837,0.014140642,0.007947071,0.0032665129,0.0049819103,0.0010726097],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010079367,0.00001851927,0.00014551955,0.00014814956,0.000003932262,0.000039031856,0.001995813,0.00044762084,0.000060931867,0.9526275,0.03134408,0.013158882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009454673,0.00006533313,0.0010175406,0.00066832604,0.00000731055,0.00013033453,0.0013640269,0.0008034469,0.00005542472,0.42742914,0.5684297,0.000019937208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007448968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004647571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008366916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067413966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004119058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048912406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901505419","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0060","title":"How institutions structure judicial behaviour: An analysis of Alarie and Green’s <i>Commitment and Cooperation on High Courts: A Cross-Country Examination of Institutional Constraints on Judges</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Simple (philosophy); Structuring; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Key (lock); Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01783893595478457,"score_gpt":0.26579021817837395,"score_spread":0.24795128222358936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901505419","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93562615,0.0009247225,0.0018419615,0.0062394636,0.00001616801,0.000054007636,0.00013630294,0.00001182667,0.055149343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970227,0.0003759334,0.00045316655,0.0005195722,0.000012754026,0.000032272597,0.00005047371,0.0000083653,0.0015248888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99571985,0.0023153792,0.00012439779,0.00035230396,0.00070587336,0.0007821394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9677384,0.019181028,0.007744661,0.0015357529,0.0020284567,0.0017717335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005311069,0.00013789663,0.0005734873,0.0017763426,0.0030987496,0.004250004,0.0015652409,0.0014567939,0.0036400573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01751187,0.0002720021,0.0005745049,0.0044220695,0.0074198204,0.0033512707,0.0027572436,0.0027702712,0.00024261605],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003404398,0.00062460406,0.24915925,0.000263622,0.00046073893,0.00075703196,0.097151175,0.007149078,0.00087452185,0.6007296,0.012603863,0.029886128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015527241,0.00035862398,0.7290136,0.0005142092,0.0004511098,0.00023490642,0.12722488,0.011113388,0.00077238044,0.10132085,0.02870452,0.00013631381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048140123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07728062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048140123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072641396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032616106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.095719814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901778456","doi":"","title":"The Constitution of the Administrative State","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Deference; Law; State (computer science); Supreme court; Constitution; Constitutional law; Judicial deference; Dissent; Jurisdiction; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.021917845986021835,"score_gpt":0.31479411389290407,"score_spread":0.29287626790688226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901778456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030036662,0.0017918838,0.01185688,0.022756707,0.0003253678,0.00010838613,0.0002190406,0.00011523041,0.93278986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.933464,0.00077615696,0.0037913115,0.0033949495,0.00018588362,0.00010333921,0.00012367991,0.00005741921,0.058103375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927159,0.0012707985,0.00018779149,0.0011500859,0.0024617151,0.0022136767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788755,0.0004955536,0.00008923056,0.00029516674,0.0008404914,0.00039203287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00360043,0.00034324158,0.0005129862,0.0015929783,0.018785713,0.01797865,0.001738708,0.0032436887,0.0046445895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004918705,0.0004714125,0.0005704005,0.0016301832,0.052403677,0.003402449,0.0043743774,0.0062703514,0.0006685224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.616638e-7,7.117237e-7,0.000039193084,0.0000016012561,5.525809e-7,0.000007557897,0.00070168485,0.000048300266,0.000020053467,0.9980076,0.0005279776,0.0006438245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024591665,0.000011537198,0.0019516688,0.00010664736,0.000021940219,0.0000486404,0.0030051952,0.00091364986,0.00030271165,0.668696,0.32486272,0.00005469377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8400974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8206195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8400974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.073755436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10810599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5351356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902231276","doi":"10.5287/ora-vjar7qa9x","title":"Conceptualising political candidacy as a human right","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Candidacy; Dignity; Duty; Obligation; Political science; Jurisprudence; Law; Politics; Autonomy; Human rights; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03623052415507665,"score_gpt":0.3219518662971362,"score_spread":0.2857213421420595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902231276","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024735661,0.0037271744,0.050705805,0.031438135,0.00066920894,0.00009065935,0.00005419948,0.000055394376,0.88852376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93794733,0.0026586894,0.01134168,0.0055371113,0.0009013322,0.0002403759,0.00006660003,0.00007870778,0.041228164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.992519,0.0043193446,0.00020297726,0.00076784135,0.0011915913,0.0009991482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99464756,0.0031892706,0.00051935023,0.00065558887,0.00053945964,0.00044867984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008480587,0.0005294999,0.0004242603,0.0019674918,0.0049155876,0.011358716,0.0013029173,0.0056004683,0.007704792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075682676,0.00032591555,0.00060883595,0.0012644907,0.066742934,0.008217214,0.0057657626,0.005741793,0.00091988314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.1677504e-7,0.0000021108249,0.000039263585,0.000006390622,5.9198896e-7,0.000015982978,0.00076577626,0.000072962,0.000025021347,0.9981213,0.00020595772,0.0007436261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008862282,0.000011759072,0.0002096888,0.00011591994,0.0000039898678,0.00007210088,0.0011497348,0.0002688119,0.00008272637,0.9231621,0.07490483,0.000009432348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004146937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036398617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011358716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004229637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071147326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04485023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903239299","doi":"10.1093/icon/moaa006","title":"Shadow constitutional review: The dark side of pre-enactment political review in Ireland and Japan","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Constitutionality; Politics; Institution; Judicial review; Parliament; Shadow (psychology); Law; Political science; Constitutional theory; Constitutional law; Sociology; Constitution; Law and economics; Democracy","score_opus":0.030280441528426034,"score_gpt":0.3364541747398641,"score_spread":0.3061737332114381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903239299","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82176596,0.0039213677,0.0027043195,0.029466558,0.00024371463,0.00016555889,0.00015067897,0.00006093505,0.14152087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99313,0.0004611775,0.00050084,0.0020480265,0.00004830108,0.00004568604,0.000039828996,0.00002147462,0.003704586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96428585,0.012232166,0.002492213,0.0035829248,0.0075993263,0.0098076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91501564,0.032747988,0.014587378,0.008282585,0.02149916,0.007867293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028178765,0.00016383374,0.00090214494,0.0040319376,0.007858037,0.014619097,0.0015919458,0.002773349,0.0030023784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0638095,0.0005158977,0.0005140207,0.0044266023,0.02188116,0.0075643044,0.009395244,0.004048139,0.00026507888],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058869174,0.00016118158,0.1385378,0.0010578695,0.00013593928,0.004724735,0.1889758,0.0010036174,0.0033637274,0.556066,0.019974004,0.085410535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019632194,0.0004172259,0.42014137,0.0012149635,0.0003209405,0.0012279535,0.24023083,0.002283183,0.0038252443,0.06609376,0.26351956,0.0005286875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14734909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18760262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14734909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031756036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040521454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29298282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904309482","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0010","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada and Appointment of Judges in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Original jurisdiction; Court of record; Jurisdiction; Parliament; Politics","score_opus":0.02238634392034839,"score_gpt":0.2031926013186986,"score_spread":0.1808062573983502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904309482","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04136497,0.018854612,0.0011084316,0.042189322,0.0010433645,0.000057921123,0.0004577354,0.00005031828,0.8948733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8823268,0.0077932915,0.0007443343,0.0072503253,0.00026055484,0.00003567779,0.00017041774,0.000054011773,0.10136461],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99208343,0.0010158031,0.0001175485,0.0006438599,0.0026448402,0.0034944369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943786,0.0015095017,0.00022327773,0.00013112008,0.0026288382,0.0011286115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002418393,0.00027263584,0.00048260306,0.003069567,0.028791625,0.0107748,0.0019068995,0.0030189494,0.010838062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008990432,0.00036819893,0.0002590446,0.0055508194,0.01662667,0.0015522076,0.002291267,0.00442456,0.0005881035],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011059294,0.000010189542,0.0012408948,0.000039600698,0.000005422205,0.0001624626,0.007647294,0.0003069366,0.00011979228,0.92609125,0.052689064,0.01167597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018991126,0.000013687969,0.016598383,0.00081989454,0.000031128086,0.00008631967,0.0146468645,0.00072716613,0.00023635277,0.06288098,0.9038517,0.00008848761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.993107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99718624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7971374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20286262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26106933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9245664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905041924","doi":"10.1017/s1352325218000149","title":"NONPARTY PARTICIPATION AS A (PARTIAL) REMEDY TO PROCEDURALIST CONCERNS OVER JUDICIAL REVIEW","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Legitimacy; Indictment; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Judicial review; Sociology; Medicine; Politics","score_opus":0.04488811439413123,"score_gpt":0.38847877126375385,"score_spread":0.34359065686962265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905041924","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14935891,0.001640778,0.29227263,0.06940227,0.00041980465,0.00049379724,0.00013010872,0.00046281327,0.48581886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96699774,0.00021848122,0.015439466,0.0030512372,0.0003101882,0.000366083,0.00002246702,0.00007153569,0.013522724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.92526335,0.051009446,0.0022611886,0.006590595,0.011269949,0.003605558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8903759,0.06540114,0.008017598,0.02756967,0.0064130933,0.0022226588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.052451957,0.00038765662,0.00091686175,0.0011590023,0.0046039307,0.009707417,0.0029815657,0.0077687656,0.008614803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.100580156,0.00071069406,0.0010676775,0.0012246659,0.020728348,0.010072289,0.012278305,0.007893198,0.0011136146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028159773,0.000036507758,0.00050839246,0.00004963118,0.000019620256,0.00007540108,0.002403247,0.000672065,0.0005900229,0.9856382,0.0011620617,0.0088166045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007067261,0.00019985989,0.0014655854,0.00018479505,0.00005945076,0.00027271587,0.0010870522,0.0048650857,0.001726237,0.93323463,0.056786492,0.000047461286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00095896906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015882311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052451957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027487525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009522467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27739578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905117221","doi":"10.29173/alr1430","title":"A Theory of Democratic Adjudication: Towards a Representative, Accountable and Independent Judiciary","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial independence; Accountability; Independence (probability theory); Adjudication; Democracy; Context (archaeology); Law; Judicial discretion; Politics; Political science; Commission; Order (exchange); Judicial activism; Judicial review; Separation of powers; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.029528190316933118,"score_gpt":0.32111342794412684,"score_spread":0.29158523762719374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905117221","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01722296,0.0027348064,0.30458227,0.08734194,0.0011448143,0.00019096167,0.00007875621,0.00010873438,0.5865949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8917763,0.001505817,0.050529815,0.009817419,0.0016329916,0.00040559756,0.000075558215,0.00010887503,0.0441476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9685413,0.019049993,0.00090858596,0.0027122046,0.005972953,0.0028150172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97876954,0.012697365,0.0017922403,0.0027073817,0.002740691,0.0012927342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025561424,0.00043236229,0.00070445327,0.002465858,0.008839422,0.014128761,0.002208064,0.006285531,0.0039667026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030282356,0.00057100644,0.00076538743,0.0023376988,0.048774283,0.009684955,0.0057957913,0.008214423,0.0012586694],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001627894,0.0000027866947,0.000053517855,0.0000062038566,0.00000136012,0.000010100872,0.00059542625,0.00018302871,0.0000122221245,0.99679595,0.00089846604,0.001439436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011357345,0.000007410154,0.00020601544,0.00003759807,0.0000029996256,0.000024783121,0.00028327748,0.0007534334,0.000045202058,0.96778774,0.030833192,0.000006988421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011779241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011480805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98822075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0094508715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014786046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13518333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905127345","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3009858","title":"The Values of Canadian Constitutionalism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Political science; Law; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.02347431849823587,"score_gpt":0.29597613182463417,"score_spread":0.2725018133263983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905127345","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031267237,0.0031971345,0.0009561981,0.04989671,0.0002759579,0.000023673127,0.00024283367,0.00003421688,0.9141061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95188713,0.0014116736,0.00085123605,0.003423933,0.00014554046,0.000027279873,0.00006651277,0.000043669632,0.04214292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98783445,0.0028702705,0.00017286082,0.0010978847,0.0041211513,0.003903441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99048305,0.0027041857,0.0003286577,0.00072288193,0.0043074945,0.0014538114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00555053,0.00053123187,0.0006260441,0.0044422345,0.032508682,0.018940747,0.0017933999,0.0042594965,0.012305868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020540196,0.00046615812,0.00038461518,0.0064850394,0.039338287,0.0046728384,0.0038142672,0.0069971965,0.0005027427],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012695296,0.0000033276397,0.000307764,0.000012524032,0.0000034917794,0.000019915102,0.0036212387,0.00009192128,0.000025890771,0.9842333,0.0073922845,0.004275556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003703708,0.000015601887,0.008780596,0.0002859108,0.000049102906,0.000085690335,0.016078046,0.00060261996,0.00025970506,0.48556215,0.4881325,0.00011108226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9789685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9864819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16127048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16127048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1551288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97280735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905133010","doi":"","title":"Of Promise and Peril: The Court and Equality Rights","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Charter; Section (typography); Sociology","score_opus":0.023384606063626745,"score_gpt":0.31461717280355006,"score_spread":0.2912325667399233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905133010","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03929841,0.015710374,0.006208182,0.30272192,0.0012424514,0.00002582844,0.00012034783,0.000042812335,0.63462967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.902266,0.0036507982,0.0013913137,0.033540692,0.000699808,0.000028382556,0.00005324851,0.000056507066,0.05831339],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896275,0.0028482953,0.00016560956,0.0010213745,0.003302702,0.00303454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99596125,0.0020638593,0.00023322324,0.00032302298,0.00071303407,0.00070558605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007186381,0.00031236556,0.0005072085,0.0013299431,0.018326895,0.019014593,0.0019991372,0.007005477,0.01033159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011645907,0.00023778237,0.0003984544,0.001264296,0.0709657,0.012664515,0.0073603643,0.009743758,0.000688361],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002604076,0.0000024979206,0.00012259373,0.000005166772,0.0000011515165,0.000033339453,0.0024389385,0.000028069813,0.000022049106,0.9930729,0.002435818,0.0018348236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011572398,0.000014658124,0.0012919896,0.00023325901,0.000008225466,0.00009635507,0.012887199,0.00021432972,0.00014976345,0.69798094,0.28708375,0.000027936743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4617402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5158428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4617402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039140653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042057995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9181051},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905153472","doi":"10.4324/9781315668567-13","title":"Judicial review of the electoral process in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Political science; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.023823364766932132,"score_gpt":0.2742276965181041,"score_spread":0.25040433175117194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905153472","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13922223,0.050704587,0.0021685301,0.034886517,0.0010465106,0.00019248505,0.0005382497,0.00007297629,0.77116793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80854607,0.022272207,0.0012498217,0.0027135664,0.0002046834,0.000047419177,0.00018882572,0.000039631428,0.1647377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99488163,0.00068883493,0.00011416144,0.0004005411,0.0024536222,0.0014611855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99469745,0.0015529314,0.00023314974,0.00014282964,0.0029261427,0.00044753437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032693364,0.0002025332,0.00035773905,0.0021336896,0.016282225,0.0076376693,0.0015719495,0.0014145828,0.0046288413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012175062,0.0003322161,0.0001754611,0.0053593908,0.0074017947,0.0013642593,0.0013878278,0.0020270795,0.00039100027],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005623236,0.00003765496,0.0048275176,0.00025508113,0.000018488054,0.0004927287,0.024240311,0.001488819,0.00044214338,0.7515342,0.10233142,0.11427529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023555247,0.00002910766,0.027650177,0.00058571977,0.000033397286,0.00014494077,0.016801955,0.0015603771,0.00084102084,0.02841666,0.9238249,0.000088201494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9855317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9954466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8670947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13290529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2379051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96429986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905977709","doi":"10.29173/alr1395","title":"Redeeming the Rule of Law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Law and economics; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.05595341588684005,"score_gpt":0.31063202793767497,"score_spread":0.2546786120508349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905977709","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012263498,0.041620832,0.012582515,0.18933116,0.0036810706,0.000046402096,0.00008933736,0.00014562819,0.74023956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57608134,0.016878983,0.006222413,0.0902396,0.003045725,0.00006491798,0.00010449346,0.00013255802,0.30723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922916,0.0024724717,0.00018335295,0.0012557276,0.002880569,0.0009162028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935381,0.0028070486,0.00043890972,0.00089240284,0.0018550025,0.00046858445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007814214,0.00031098444,0.00043798628,0.0012642804,0.0055329106,0.008708136,0.0012230264,0.0046246974,0.008476062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01656609,0.00024876627,0.00030593696,0.0007816159,0.021337202,0.0049453643,0.002324435,0.008322738,0.0016161213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066415796,0.0000061243245,0.00017458803,0.00004598227,0.0000047983626,0.000040898336,0.0012022811,0.00006201427,0.0001452729,0.94091445,0.039652873,0.017743995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009552163,0.000020249698,0.000917123,0.00016706671,0.000010889629,0.0000983382,0.00093262165,0.00011783828,0.00026738667,0.17229594,0.8251504,0.000012644751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10524064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14721505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10524064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008876292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017436177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20925617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906133617","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0024","title":"Constructing the global constitutional canon: Between authority and criticism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitutionalism; Human rights; Constitutional law; Political science; Comparative law; Criticism; Sociology; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.024486889273632746,"score_gpt":0.2788400033718727,"score_spread":0.25435311409823996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2906133617","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03588924,0.013486849,0.060039055,0.38413215,0.002856228,0.000096133066,0.000074699485,0.000288178,0.50313747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9251858,0.0028358712,0.012026629,0.034980267,0.002399623,0.00021324419,0.00007016439,0.00038663833,0.021901732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9714858,0.019529216,0.0007462898,0.0030458644,0.0035779711,0.0016148482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9627115,0.026983762,0.0011887212,0.0054645645,0.0024584983,0.001192918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03383431,0.0007354635,0.0010318013,0.0038535215,0.009563898,0.026001822,0.0032842224,0.013389335,0.0051700897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04144343,0.0005301936,0.00076144666,0.002533495,0.09814707,0.02876914,0.012839327,0.013833471,0.00087045575],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027918056,0.0000026010582,0.00006329462,0.00000947476,0.0000018909732,0.000024821566,0.0037462187,0.00006252113,0.000017746923,0.99256647,0.0014227045,0.0020794242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007049634,0.0000057756242,0.00009821085,0.00011554609,0.000003764921,0.000024123328,0.004554066,0.00029383047,0.00006532833,0.94720614,0.047616653,0.000009569926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002927162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031406647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03383431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010338071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071177916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17893505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906659536","doi":"","title":"Reassessing the Constitutional Foundation of Delegated Legislation in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Lawmaking; Delegation; Law; Political science; Constitution; Legislation; Supreme court; Democracy; Legislature; Politics","score_opus":0.012097330551733709,"score_gpt":0.26047579130853993,"score_spread":0.24837846075680622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2906659536","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2623393,0.008205491,0.009668131,0.09429329,0.0012309029,0.00029604955,0.0013363382,0.0003005921,0.6223299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9189497,0.002284331,0.0042127483,0.011575655,0.00015121468,0.00007761997,0.0003010325,0.00009069832,0.06235698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890007,0.00071571325,0.00033431395,0.0013119776,0.004773131,0.003864131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99098176,0.0020689357,0.00035754577,0.0006169959,0.004557841,0.0014168775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005700907,0.00023198882,0.0005336015,0.002112368,0.020745676,0.010692159,0.002249528,0.003532897,0.0059520286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014220902,0.00071783713,0.0005432125,0.0027380225,0.013478164,0.0026279744,0.0041255746,0.006644395,0.0003667827],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000281983,0.000017248225,0.002911817,0.000062017825,0.000020372394,0.00043236068,0.010801449,0.00069661456,0.0008634577,0.9527435,0.0154332435,0.015989706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010955536,0.000055955086,0.028989198,0.0005654102,0.00016386966,0.0002867277,0.010624498,0.003083873,0.003107279,0.100418866,0.85225374,0.00034113624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99140733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99547833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19226371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19226371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23975205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9368596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908791645","doi":"","title":"Peter Cory at the Supreme Court of Canada: An Introduction","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.023659915940206746,"score_gpt":0.25621665547573036,"score_spread":0.2325567395355236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908791645","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028807553,0.35492247,0.0025922672,0.49688894,0.011950257,0.00012969818,0.00099389,0.000072229224,0.12956953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09996624,0.3291928,0.006090515,0.3140136,0.02064637,0.00025188143,0.0005069444,0.00041268367,0.22891894],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99452543,0.0009838121,0.00018973688,0.00056103535,0.0024045636,0.0013354757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99323976,0.00335794,0.00014864463,0.00013474541,0.0023623928,0.00075657695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004102453,0.0011222477,0.0015516845,0.007433975,0.023110619,0.014910432,0.0031849213,0.016880654,0.011661785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012108437,0.0012852038,0.00095821236,0.013456198,0.016762588,0.010227347,0.002744675,0.01295486,0.0013238398],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013991327,0.000031003838,0.0006407298,0.0002778689,0.000016448765,0.00018280275,0.0024710672,0.00047797794,0.000094803,0.43997908,0.5374751,0.0183391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013255507,0.0000073107026,0.0019984283,0.0010922181,0.00001727565,0.00006411574,0.0022637732,0.00015086301,0.00008217187,0.07539988,0.91883624,0.000074538584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9578417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98139143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.095884435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.095884435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10321926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6956935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909747325","doi":"","title":"Th e Protective Function of the Constitutional Amending Formula","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Parliament; Legislature; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Politics; Power (physics); Enumerated powers; Interpretation (philosophy); Separation of powers; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.05151756309056284,"score_gpt":0.29775353075041033,"score_spread":0.2462359676598475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2909747325","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03565921,0.0038988586,0.0400225,0.053099625,0.0023146195,0.00018055255,0.00012817375,0.00024514992,0.86445135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92141306,0.0016754494,0.014787096,0.013121227,0.0013302624,0.00022272191,0.00007776809,0.00008923974,0.047283154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834381,0.0059357923,0.00086422986,0.0022466688,0.0054291463,0.0020860443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98344904,0.007269313,0.001131912,0.0044375923,0.00330009,0.000412077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010680575,0.00039799258,0.0006738526,0.0019770814,0.0045542154,0.008674071,0.0019802917,0.0058333254,0.004507648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032865748,0.0004965544,0.0007038376,0.0013812963,0.030176898,0.004915609,0.0036659702,0.009417455,0.0007001157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030474075,0.0000029614955,0.000054026277,0.000006803801,0.0000013231119,0.000016576822,0.00039864547,0.000039742106,0.00007565058,0.9954692,0.0010150139,0.0029169905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007069573,0.000105948275,0.0021860993,0.00024415104,0.00006678621,0.00025876248,0.00123065,0.0012457327,0.0024041028,0.71360654,0.27850112,0.00007946715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02440772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021282101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02440772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072348733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015503968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056484938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910215669","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Canadian Federal Government: Law and Legal Information","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Law; Political science; Legal research; Public administration","score_opus":0.04347282701125633,"score_gpt":0.3326635457391904,"score_spread":0.28919071872793406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910215669","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011643172,0.010432699,0.0012598016,0.030572873,0.0023495262,0.00076313165,0.19480632,0.0012202038,0.75743103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0072355783,0.008778635,0.003024118,0.0028113609,0.0003327296,0.00057007885,0.028012982,0.00052991597,0.94870466],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99485236,0.00037522562,0.00030938364,0.0003503206,0.0035413126,0.00057141244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9629268,0.0054915925,0.0005858383,0.0012145173,0.028148571,0.0016327119],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050510378,0.0013733662,0.0013537066,0.016033804,0.011047642,0.011988804,0.002858988,0.004867854,0.35108492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027635993,0.0012880021,0.00078247703,0.032479145,0.0028543603,0.0050249677,0.0015793127,0.0042322585,0.06461221],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007719825,0.000009939526,0.00015908018,0.00013538558,0.0000015041142,0.0000083373525,0.00017481156,0.000052452724,0.000017481616,0.009653612,0.9759153,0.01386425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008017796,0.000003132534,0.0023531076,0.00041737637,0.0000066203397,0.00000846169,0.00056069164,0.000074228374,0.00008696154,0.002552281,0.993911,0.000018149187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9805993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9916815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35108492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08599006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.251552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9255986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911209324","doi":"","title":"An Analysis of the \"No Hierarchy of Constitutional Rights\" Doctrine","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Supreme court; Constitution; Hierarchy; Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.019014728724406037,"score_gpt":0.2685540167596146,"score_spread":0.24953928803520856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911209324","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021994239,0.0047940062,0.039143756,0.07326412,0.000538107,0.00012507463,0.00017367111,0.000043117874,0.85992396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9132527,0.0029131905,0.010148427,0.016841432,0.00060667086,0.00018663569,0.00010877469,0.00004171385,0.055900384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922029,0.002023475,0.00018715608,0.0006859504,0.003514909,0.0013856766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949098,0.0027411585,0.00048630536,0.0003694254,0.0012137205,0.00027949296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062572467,0.00033765205,0.00043880934,0.002072697,0.0067092576,0.005694978,0.0019685996,0.004144856,0.0059672007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009788376,0.00033901838,0.00056421716,0.0016445647,0.036022443,0.005635236,0.0022917097,0.0064461785,0.0005796573],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.199238e-7,0.0000010766961,0.000024696086,0.0000034863601,3.9674688e-7,0.000007586844,0.0001785076,0.000031269734,0.000013404563,0.9985268,0.0006162687,0.00059593684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012026589,0.00001073665,0.00062013825,0.0000828394,0.0000055374117,0.00004020146,0.0005349763,0.00060384796,0.00016419087,0.9309348,0.06697957,0.000011124686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14811176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16222277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14811176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019519284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020458097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29449934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911565875","doi":"","title":"Selection and Appointment of Clerks in Canadian Jurisdictions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Position (finance); Process (computing); Path (computing); Political science; Public relations; Law; Law and economics; Management; Sociology; Business; Computer science; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Finance","score_opus":0.023147873868524155,"score_gpt":0.29884417459660073,"score_spread":0.2756963007280766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911565875","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49264115,0.045723766,0.002346462,0.07272383,0.0026419242,0.0011304332,0.0014981645,0.00012421544,0.38117003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94720674,0.0063088774,0.001148278,0.008117162,0.0002072078,0.00012533522,0.00029792797,0.000050371338,0.03653808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95896643,0.00710796,0.0016560184,0.0031387717,0.015026478,0.014104303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93817675,0.015142132,0.0035801062,0.0012861928,0.033728216,0.00808662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036715243,0.00027888422,0.00083657843,0.0061882227,0.02656937,0.010538266,0.00377967,0.003674537,0.0043874867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07936449,0.0006621167,0.00046021774,0.007408752,0.0070467857,0.0021996766,0.0035825095,0.0036934938,0.0005227373],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064453133,0.00022604043,0.07988453,0.0021275855,0.00016486592,0.0023606035,0.07898731,0.0018566141,0.003498553,0.3032521,0.25462466,0.27237257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009938243,0.00013775624,0.31442562,0.0014783605,0.00017425317,0.00022793862,0.048524622,0.0010314023,0.0019965798,0.005484056,0.6261198,0.00030013057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98116136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9953453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83039635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16960363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27837124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9631421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W291190803","doi":"","title":"The Most Dangerous Branch: How the Supreme Court of Canada Has Undermined Our Laws and Our Democracy","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Judicial activism; Judicial review; Politics; Democracy; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Dissenting opinion","score_opus":0.04736306842465549,"score_gpt":0.26593113935701734,"score_spread":0.21856807093236186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W291190803","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012957571,0.10918489,0.0010350309,0.6401889,0.0052383905,0.000048268896,0.000510708,0.00012268499,0.23071355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54290193,0.077174686,0.0015836273,0.15493199,0.0021779,0.00006506924,0.00033513128,0.0003222579,0.22050732],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99058694,0.0012656332,0.00010747827,0.00048684183,0.004388355,0.003164809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946585,0.0009484613,0.00020977324,0.00013017106,0.0023082928,0.0017447617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038703138,0.0005940628,0.0005580207,0.002155134,0.041544143,0.02062071,0.0025981488,0.0073782234,0.010575048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009937127,0.0006085653,0.00053908926,0.0042528724,0.020511929,0.005028994,0.0043735383,0.009877462,0.0011148693],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030821524,0.000015287618,0.0015169308,0.00012304494,0.000025092848,0.00044373196,0.0121430755,0.00032663092,0.00016412041,0.3053558,0.6464972,0.033358313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018796381,0.0000104403425,0.0051509724,0.0003942736,0.00003056059,0.00013817543,0.013216997,0.00027879217,0.00016555202,0.029531935,0.9509756,0.000087913446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9927987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99739265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8071649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19283506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21102908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9361969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912654848","doi":"","title":"IS THE RULE OF LAWTHE GOLDEN RULE? ACCESSING “JUSTICE” FOR CANADA’S POOR","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Rule of law; Charter; Supreme court; Political science; Economic Justice; Due process; Normative; Public law; Sociology; Sources of law; Politics","score_opus":0.0562258748281742,"score_gpt":0.32641494124774106,"score_spread":0.27018906641956686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912654848","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09566962,0.022427138,0.0025713763,0.5554386,0.00090467016,0.00005490428,0.00035034976,0.00006554771,0.32251787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.922665,0.009107887,0.0011711409,0.040365256,0.00022568316,0.000023403403,0.000050394192,0.00003736495,0.02635389],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936348,0.0009344412,0.00013680091,0.0004407188,0.0020274098,0.0028258546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933449,0.0025197715,0.00033430464,0.0002999604,0.002476957,0.0010241187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004448386,0.00022016991,0.00057962164,0.0017307056,0.025071228,0.012228263,0.0017405635,0.0045496067,0.004289039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014511665,0.00033442426,0.0002670822,0.001796256,0.025867475,0.0044755894,0.0029266928,0.0064823087,0.00028186955],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018541263,0.000013052203,0.0024028688,0.00010966269,0.0000140918155,0.000324718,0.013949376,0.0002752451,0.00024312522,0.9278984,0.038751982,0.015998935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037303067,0.000021678175,0.012961092,0.001098175,0.000064711676,0.0002670532,0.03715856,0.00066570245,0.00066442194,0.24046615,0.70642924,0.00016591264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9847906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99005705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9284516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.071548425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1783249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5191226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912870780","doi":"","title":"Disabusing the Common Law of 'Abuse of Rights': The Only Legitimate Rule Redux","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Reservation of rights; Human rights; Doctrine; Right to property; Autonomy; Obligation; Social rights; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.014911958533964221,"score_gpt":0.28937245069852446,"score_spread":0.27446049216456025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912870780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050309222,0.0067293467,0.08035007,0.23722772,0.0022036338,0.00012001654,0.0001925626,0.000259393,0.62260807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88394046,0.0015416677,0.015114419,0.033421177,0.0015735527,0.000262155,0.000075587086,0.00020606944,0.06386498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9756554,0.0092311315,0.0012036932,0.0041100774,0.007564771,0.002234979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9797839,0.009577874,0.0015436963,0.005242024,0.002872458,0.0009800505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020243678,0.0004411497,0.0012390569,0.0010351395,0.008087734,0.012444278,0.0023190724,0.009102977,0.0026637677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030275397,0.00063891034,0.00069694535,0.0007621741,0.08123951,0.013447486,0.007156325,0.016302278,0.0013672085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003511552,0.0000043902896,0.00008212587,0.0000076065307,0.0000024206877,0.000022574128,0.001314477,0.000028357374,0.00005892889,0.99382377,0.0027751485,0.0018766995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019030369,0.000018991896,0.00023982067,0.00011361499,0.000009457462,0.00014252156,0.0008377192,0.00024499354,0.00039581698,0.90618765,0.09176337,0.00002703533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009426395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008107535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020243678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046506845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011105694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.107060075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913040782","doi":"10.3138/9781487519483-002","title":"Introduction: Judicial Policy Impact in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.0192848742302349,"score_gpt":0.23819661036044293,"score_spread":0.21891173613020803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913040782","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005783357,0.108664006,0.00070185174,0.117969394,0.008281085,0.00008759766,0.008343274,0.00027485855,0.7498946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.091524854,0.09957719,0.0013790793,0.024737995,0.0035758081,0.0000942586,0.0025813954,0.00033939618,0.77619],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841547,0.0001025832,0.00004416233,0.00012898784,0.0008391967,0.0004695894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977342,0.00049514533,0.00004763989,0.00006405527,0.0013628872,0.00029593727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084851484,0.0006820835,0.0006617441,0.004492872,0.010941786,0.008328131,0.0015200025,0.0030816814,0.065167114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034090476,0.00053667574,0.00061587495,0.012758809,0.002946594,0.0020674379,0.0011378076,0.003674345,0.004033771],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009983493,0.000011843544,0.0004351619,0.00018636696,0.0000054994402,0.000059111248,0.0012596835,0.00034064383,0.000049761806,0.11710511,0.85814005,0.022396738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005337237,0.0000027780206,0.003624956,0.0003367786,0.0000080365835,0.000019565074,0.0011182972,0.00009332817,0.00005182857,0.006719267,0.9879991,0.000020654157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99141157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9968189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89404535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10595468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14100364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7687586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913374802","doi":"","title":"All I Really Needed to Know about Federalism, I Learned from Insurance Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Law; Constitutional law; Political science; Constitution; Public law; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.06509475405411932,"score_gpt":0.3207575643447488,"score_spread":0.2556628102906294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913374802","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01112342,0.06598193,0.022125969,0.70836,0.0043172645,0.00004701898,0.0004616048,0.00016129078,0.18742158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62819016,0.11907969,0.03226638,0.14406289,0.005937918,0.00007761092,0.000387535,0.00024045851,0.069757335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961826,0.0009929438,0.000119468496,0.0005662946,0.0015761572,0.0005625005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99415237,0.003023273,0.00025319227,0.00046947147,0.0016442353,0.0004574546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005009198,0.00048955256,0.00066549866,0.0027190503,0.010370892,0.008307088,0.0014874515,0.003078955,0.007189525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011503421,0.00031908645,0.00057416223,0.0033103374,0.04101174,0.009016682,0.0024535062,0.010376595,0.0009898023],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000150466085,0.000013174006,0.0012620696,0.00025753968,0.000017662189,0.00013654029,0.011101723,0.00030723063,0.00021163472,0.8661378,0.07741238,0.04312725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000770748,0.000021722879,0.002492232,0.00078226044,0.000019364723,0.00017343294,0.0070157293,0.0003932001,0.00037378864,0.30955443,0.67910075,0.00006527279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7379874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7526593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7379874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035506673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027719365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5271113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913737857","doi":"","title":"BOOK REVIEW - COMPTE RENDU - AGAINST JUDICIAL ACTIVISM: THE DECLINE OF FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY IN CANADA - APPOINTING JUDGES IN AN AGE OF JUDICIAL POWER: CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Judicial activism; Political science; Power (physics); Law; Judicial review; Politics","score_opus":0.027164084117366375,"score_gpt":0.3120949977601394,"score_spread":0.284930913642773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913737857","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011396828,0.49036446,0.00024224578,0.28021905,0.03278578,0.00005274154,0.0006700528,0.0000599211,0.19446608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.047161754,0.46703193,0.00053898897,0.14781773,0.030230297,0.00009985252,0.0006534664,0.00016520634,0.30630073],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99641645,0.00034501642,0.0000872681,0.00026701464,0.0024139346,0.00047036252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984602,0.0039127567,0.00042666876,0.0002707814,0.010028037,0.0007598001],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030686858,0.0006763245,0.0010702652,0.007169415,0.007228372,0.010290277,0.0027484167,0.0071433196,0.021860426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011720572,0.00048446425,0.00049456646,0.014346757,0.00741937,0.002655991,0.0011326338,0.005364983,0.0034248792],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004171068,0.0000039972315,0.000111753034,0.00022971997,0.0000054303796,0.000020897747,0.000182237,0.00005961833,0.000021395424,0.022529822,0.96523386,0.011597173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042431043,0.000002803542,0.00092254655,0.0006435749,0.000012141538,0.000022522292,0.00041718653,0.000032204025,0.000024368761,0.0027288832,0.9951786,0.000010928223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90075016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9730319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09924984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.055316534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0857892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40135145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914460757","doi":"","title":"Freedom of Expression and the Canadian Charter of Rights","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Individualism; Adjudication; Freedom of expression; Political science; Expression (computer science); Law and economics; Character (mathematics); Law; Human rights; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01105645848648737,"score_gpt":0.22842281636037642,"score_spread":0.21736635787388905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914460757","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018515278,0.0051592807,0.0034058527,0.053885374,0.00059209345,0.00005759648,0.00025790042,0.000054307624,0.91807234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80458677,0.006244764,0.0044659204,0.012110681,0.00034707726,0.00009074093,0.00019772766,0.00008032847,0.171876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880043,0.001449347,0.00017173514,0.00090788567,0.005645548,0.0038212806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953548,0.0015172975,0.00025462103,0.0003204488,0.0018652749,0.00068757974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004274339,0.00053155754,0.0005992719,0.0027303097,0.0275104,0.012771103,0.001880695,0.0046794033,0.009806348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012681416,0.00044250145,0.0005488513,0.004688491,0.027830778,0.003786531,0.004000905,0.0065370905,0.00058907125],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044414473,0.000001782173,0.00010280085,0.000008017984,9.754613e-7,0.000028661745,0.0009702513,0.00012995022,0.000022969756,0.98890543,0.006936785,0.0028879743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039181235,0.000013311306,0.0035312532,0.00023870575,0.000019735526,0.00012310753,0.0040837075,0.0009812813,0.0002588545,0.28611463,0.70447123,0.0001250239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99029934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9931995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86852974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13147025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16547348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9538879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916589643","doi":"","title":"THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE BAR: AN UNWRITTEN CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Supreme court; Independence (probability theory); Legislation; Constitutional right; Government (linguistics); Constitutional law; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0406275365159231,"score_gpt":0.31698606332046025,"score_spread":0.27635852680453715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916589643","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039519567,0.011407813,0.04563593,0.22906512,0.0014938808,0.0001537755,0.00035749513,0.00010178306,0.6722647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89442843,0.00302019,0.012008922,0.039966304,0.0015927749,0.00015502013,0.000112096815,0.00007565287,0.04864068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96443903,0.006746852,0.0011500524,0.0036010107,0.018534396,0.0055285757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.965817,0.018893287,0.002158235,0.003204999,0.008466634,0.00145997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023498695,0.00032362435,0.0010022894,0.0020388307,0.011667194,0.013342117,0.003548575,0.00850272,0.0028579454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042402685,0.0007649875,0.0007577766,0.0015700258,0.04334875,0.0081835585,0.004882655,0.02015853,0.0007133649],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049559494,0.000005773011,0.00020909715,0.00001940512,0.0000048998268,0.000029305189,0.0010238515,0.00006211829,0.00010094812,0.99098116,0.0037034138,0.003855064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053391985,0.00003975702,0.004725536,0.00041972307,0.000059928236,0.0001399,0.0014412998,0.00066384097,0.0008388368,0.74254733,0.2489636,0.000106921485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28384727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39280906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9784984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021501584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.062188648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5643902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W291686183","doi":"","title":"Judicial Review in Canadian Constitutional Law: A Brief Overview","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œGeorge Washington international law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Law; Political science; Legislation; Charter; Statute; Legitimacy; Judicial activism; Jurisdiction; Judicial independence; Constitution; Legislature; Politics","score_opus":0.033522867881349325,"score_gpt":0.32204463749535595,"score_spread":0.2885217696140066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W291686183","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003909733,0.6059769,0.0043180725,0.0751371,0.0038840512,0.00027518877,0.00046314156,0.00014334888,0.3058925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.116865814,0.7989218,0.0058857827,0.018470034,0.0044322107,0.00018926432,0.0003872917,0.00014080259,0.054707065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868377,0.0021045948,0.0006421841,0.00093342166,0.0067865695,0.0026955542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9848193,0.00519608,0.0007368379,0.000320238,0.0076788403,0.0012487229],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073270253,0.0008135108,0.0008808588,0.01627311,0.015003637,0.013230078,0.0028709592,0.005954633,0.009604126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01604927,0.001039473,0.0007598324,0.029012017,0.01395642,0.0042561507,0.0024543563,0.0043868287,0.0011791172],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028913255,0.000060543403,0.0021558993,0.0016143783,0.000020293508,0.000702438,0.003942145,0.0012478238,0.00016918282,0.62071085,0.20161285,0.16773467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062225836,0.000011952859,0.0035937098,0.0010927048,0.000012042,0.00017252634,0.0006902117,0.00037389432,0.000062515894,0.009377838,0.98455596,0.0000504118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96797144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9750812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18819788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18819788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23256311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9415754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918129775","doi":"10.1017/9781108605991.005","title":"On the Hardingian Renovation of Legal Transplants","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Phenomenon; Proposition; Construct (python library); Law and economics; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Limit (mathematics); Relation (database); Political science; Law; Epistemology; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics; Philosophy; Programming language","score_opus":0.035456725093217775,"score_gpt":0.21901196210874596,"score_spread":0.18355523701552817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918129775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022984648,0.0125873955,0.008190013,0.02974946,0.0007243777,0.000045252065,0.000027158554,0.000051044866,0.92564064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78366,0.005615612,0.003120332,0.011248397,0.0007053877,0.00010001773,0.000022009861,0.00009870581,0.19542952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99654526,0.0014143265,0.000075894895,0.00049422856,0.0009126111,0.00055772567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975889,0.0014511251,0.00015425308,0.0004032966,0.00029078577,0.00011173678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005271441,0.0002718123,0.00037111275,0.0011064922,0.006144524,0.006246786,0.0013262862,0.0027316953,0.0061147404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00860102,0.00025564618,0.00031843307,0.0011926601,0.037430394,0.0065272814,0.004124726,0.005436977,0.00050720177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001823855,0.0000011630046,0.000018928367,0.0000036453298,4.0430643e-7,0.0000074980644,0.00036707512,0.000063374675,0.0000127163785,0.99620545,0.00108155,0.0022363407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011678557,0.000016074518,0.00032851176,0.000119742486,0.0000043180144,0.000053061627,0.0005855026,0.00042950272,0.0002951873,0.7670452,0.23109967,0.000011545141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01824878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022127744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01824878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008635519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059172446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06265539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2919840808","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqz010","title":"A Conservative Disposition and Constitutional Change","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Disposition; Constitution; Relevance (law); Convention; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06631842434658214,"score_gpt":0.3410341956654997,"score_spread":0.27471577131891756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2919840808","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18008071,0.02453655,0.024361478,0.1741242,0.0038039382,0.00009145368,0.00015689786,0.00012984783,0.5927149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985145,0.0010925081,0.0010175733,0.006636351,0.00030088617,0.000024566058,0.000023553004,0.000016646973,0.0057429215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900343,0.005355224,0.0004057038,0.0010517166,0.0019977116,0.0011552837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982655,0.010019972,0.0019102391,0.0018855307,0.0026480884,0.0008812473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011873266,0.00016569337,0.0004274507,0.0014994164,0.0035159497,0.006790218,0.00074215914,0.0039304704,0.003990606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024276724,0.00017870955,0.00035800345,0.0012165438,0.033954445,0.006021101,0.00396975,0.005937899,0.00048350784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011155133,0.0000066765265,0.000729703,0.000044577955,0.000005445315,0.000115746894,0.0025304637,0.00013943802,0.000119489894,0.989277,0.0017793376,0.005240896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015466643,0.000041856063,0.004510138,0.0005429129,0.00001599524,0.00018831054,0.005504012,0.00029251652,0.00040277373,0.852288,0.13615507,0.00004305539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045002787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004815782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011873266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053153685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003423106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06279254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921602097","doi":"","title":"THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA AND TRIBUNALS - DEFERENCE TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS: A RECENT PHENOMENON OR A RETURN TO BASICS?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Scrutiny; Supreme court; Law; Statutory law; Judicial review; Jurisprudence; Appeal; Administrative law; Political science; Standard of review; Judicial opinion","score_opus":0.0904309366278587,"score_gpt":0.33706495871145664,"score_spread":0.24663402208359794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921602097","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12630548,0.095830016,0.0026676664,0.4294095,0.0014393815,0.00004537717,0.0005468434,0.000085318075,0.34367037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9402525,0.015309681,0.0005573981,0.018301101,0.00063883944,0.000012580856,0.00008505204,0.000040094517,0.024802726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903529,0.0014585125,0.00016500663,0.0009557846,0.0041749002,0.0028928716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863193,0.00479347,0.0013157383,0.0005603274,0.004945822,0.0020653442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049363286,0.0002356381,0.0005697509,0.0035072411,0.023790114,0.019738281,0.0026291008,0.005153532,0.0043126317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02274945,0.000402538,0.0002864925,0.008677187,0.0458256,0.0046907235,0.0025686156,0.0065464834,0.00028250748],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019677509,0.000016586977,0.004008808,0.000100574944,0.000017056023,0.00022046793,0.022666352,0.00017247292,0.00015820788,0.9181441,0.03186265,0.022613017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027916829,0.000030111798,0.045802724,0.00088430353,0.000053828546,0.00024759545,0.029951157,0.0005229987,0.0003806784,0.102112226,0.81982833,0.00015807876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98953795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9944022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14429618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14429618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18228602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9924951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922251482","doi":"10.1093/icon/moz082","title":"New Dominion constitutionalism at the twilight of the British Empire: An introduction","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dominion; Constitutionalism; Independence (probability theory); Colonialism; Commonwealth; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; History; Politics; Democracy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.013009220931433522,"score_gpt":0.2890994675627693,"score_spread":0.27609024663133575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922251482","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03089614,0.27380353,0.0064931354,0.05401406,0.007912298,0.00007774708,0.00022804626,0.000056437788,0.6265185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6857631,0.15965413,0.0036094876,0.0064588,0.004634652,0.00011468991,0.0001985627,0.000119289696,0.13944724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984957,0.00068181317,0.00008446012,0.00013007519,0.00035524127,0.0002527667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870265,0.0008575032,0.0000503812,0.0000666144,0.00022574377,0.000097076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014744463,0.000304294,0.00044014264,0.0025459114,0.0050955573,0.006657569,0.0005189219,0.0019350997,0.006158415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025885124,0.00029929657,0.00029019406,0.0030313102,0.011740954,0.0035948935,0.0014011565,0.0038268021,0.0005207579],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012268834,0.000019483678,0.0004704625,0.00021892962,0.000005342902,0.00023190977,0.01094915,0.00036176687,0.00022247357,0.93081313,0.028816426,0.027878577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030174658,0.000012285136,0.0023634543,0.0006331362,0.0000035694616,0.00015274211,0.0031910788,0.00025199424,0.00009296741,0.093404174,0.899869,0.000022557884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13249908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13350034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13249908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015180077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038599079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26345575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922383890","doi":"10.18572/1813-1247-2019-2-50-53","title":"THE MECHANISM OF DEMARCATION OF JURISDICTIONS BETWEEN FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES AND PROVINCIAL ONES IN CANADA","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"STATE POWER AND LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mechanism (biology); Government (linguistics); Public administration; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.005141928347993043,"score_gpt":0.21175063360010316,"score_spread":0.20660870525211011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922383890","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8732596,0.00056476775,0.0017340897,0.0036504283,0.000027822496,0.000077176664,0.00024798227,0.00003984492,0.12039827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99368733,0.00006791846,0.0003137225,0.00008401997,0.0000015199432,0.0000087527105,0.000023572446,0.0000062830336,0.0058068344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948036,0.0006877576,0.00016177665,0.0004611252,0.0011633132,0.0027223115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98715776,0.003947755,0.0010602939,0.0005573107,0.005994492,0.0012823122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041532116,0.00013591835,0.00058657385,0.0035222017,0.021647535,0.009689177,0.0030245709,0.0013448123,0.0074160043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02109828,0.0005240816,0.00037466775,0.005066241,0.011799135,0.0021092682,0.0039482657,0.0023516044,0.00026764505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001422462,0.00004683183,0.04845484,0.00007701275,0.000039417213,0.00026886963,0.067805454,0.0020197162,0.00096694013,0.84205794,0.0071515925,0.030969122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015281583,0.0000879614,0.44700903,0.00054541946,0.00027612306,0.0002849728,0.27293444,0.01336201,0.0042024693,0.12002333,0.14080717,0.0003143281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9939388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99733895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8790883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.120911725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15212125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87728006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2925510742","doi":"10.4000/ethiquepublique.3837","title":"Désobéissance civile et dénonciation gouvernementale : le cas d’Edward Snowden","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Éthique Publique","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02024135231674861,"score_gpt":0.29970796330431015,"score_spread":0.27946661098756154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2925510742","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25503504,0.010249606,0.0018915355,0.11962258,0.0007854704,0.000032802756,0.000033355187,0.000016303185,0.6123333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91071147,0.0023946143,0.00028660643,0.005895008,0.00013600821,0.000018818268,0.000007540645,0.000018013838,0.08053203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99721473,0.0013166962,0.00006046572,0.00030787927,0.00041669336,0.00068354874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971871,0.0019168003,0.00023853815,0.00016781864,0.00022698086,0.0002628295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003243499,0.00025888142,0.00027571514,0.0005134866,0.014488512,0.008088227,0.0007687488,0.004447877,0.004346218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060320497,0.00029056557,0.00016693509,0.00078878214,0.028310612,0.0040823407,0.0050247656,0.005878488,0.0003587378],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013911219,0.000005478952,0.00042422474,0.00002206054,0.0000021309468,0.0006331947,0.0715206,0.00008989749,0.0001233467,0.91536397,0.009188273,0.0026129049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026051324,0.00003856361,0.0030089535,0.00035347822,0.000013992959,0.0004607933,0.13108616,0.0002837367,0.0007534963,0.16581494,0.69810784,0.000052115345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12897788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20058425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12897788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010486034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007771732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25645435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2926525404","doi":"10.7202/1058196ar","title":"Expanding the Parameters of Participatory Public Law: A Democratic Right to Public Participation and the State’s Duty of Public Consultation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Duty; Deliberative democracy; Citizen journalism; Public participation; Political science; Law; Liberalism; State (computer science); Public administration; Public law; Deliberation; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.07749659188114771,"score_gpt":0.32268579658395175,"score_spread":0.24518920470280403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2926525404","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07253629,0.0054867477,0.07533043,0.10889062,0.00033131428,0.0002491751,0.00012663903,0.00012733683,0.7369214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97175086,0.0011614527,0.008433491,0.00482736,0.000108548345,0.00012500904,0.000031510117,0.00002955109,0.013532296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98088753,0.0070689623,0.00039721958,0.0015560128,0.005894862,0.004195485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914506,0.004464362,0.00052566756,0.0012338276,0.0014982331,0.000827298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011520496,0.00042575347,0.0005403076,0.0015302438,0.014253646,0.013463165,0.0024025135,0.006008671,0.005926039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016167589,0.00042952425,0.00071605766,0.0016343497,0.05301705,0.010811745,0.010226217,0.008296274,0.00053330406],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005213261,0.0000050582858,0.00022795328,0.000017170549,0.0000019343004,0.000041787247,0.0034462584,0.00027512913,0.00008533977,0.99067664,0.00082105567,0.004396455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003185458,0.000020088095,0.0023125017,0.00032761157,0.000020120018,0.00014343444,0.007382208,0.0016028692,0.00055555615,0.83522284,0.1523246,0.000056259694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46270743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55628973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46270743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03778911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07060165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9200283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W293323243","doi":"","title":"Looking Abroad When Interpreting the U.S. Constitution: Some Reflections","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas international law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitution; Supreme court; Principal (computer security); Subject (documents); Political science; Constitutional law; Relevance (law); Perplexity; Sociology","score_opus":0.029276174189634734,"score_gpt":0.3500193444613795,"score_spread":0.32074317027174476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W293323243","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014615227,0.02015297,0.0034038099,0.87385285,0.0050238264,0.000048638987,0.000046538495,0.000043472657,0.08281267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51184124,0.041164488,0.012027981,0.36476678,0.005740383,0.00020854986,0.00010923245,0.00031668466,0.06382464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9784112,0.016697513,0.00042278823,0.00094993453,0.001407826,0.002110708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97993696,0.016381152,0.0004821631,0.00041168527,0.0015221776,0.0012660353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032811295,0.000754534,0.0010157257,0.0021286851,0.019944074,0.018531485,0.004246343,0.020377208,0.0066646747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02960522,0.00081183924,0.0012609408,0.0025516297,0.038951304,0.031029347,0.0076613966,0.037056595,0.001627841],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007610523,0.00019289684,0.0012577098,0.0003745895,0.000021112284,0.002071968,0.19847645,0.00057912216,0.00039734427,0.6277279,0.1296455,0.03917928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025688056,0.000104031766,0.0008896693,0.002134802,0.000019375057,0.00060245296,0.42857984,0.00062165095,0.00077904644,0.1498896,0.41623506,0.000118789314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0571526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08129014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0571526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015616651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012626001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1735248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2934581520","doi":"10.7202/1058195ar","title":"Cabinet Immunity in Canada: The Legal Black Hole","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Constitution; Principle of legality; Constitutionality; Judicial review; Statutory law; Separation of powers; Jurisprudence; Sociology","score_opus":0.019515672917165435,"score_gpt":0.24858846533777462,"score_spread":0.22907279242060918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2934581520","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045611504,0.016019477,0.0043431,0.47029,0.001565814,0.000076915145,0.00039367392,0.00015611938,0.46154344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8014517,0.009691223,0.002992944,0.11158794,0.0008184735,0.00007839648,0.00013693323,0.000117300915,0.07312511],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899149,0.00088222226,0.00020258415,0.0011308955,0.004562595,0.0033067926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99073607,0.004004858,0.00041222342,0.0003181121,0.002867168,0.0016616383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056455024,0.00046598952,0.00078928354,0.0023532216,0.03069929,0.016044829,0.0037739018,0.015121842,0.012956718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017311562,0.00082617265,0.00066504505,0.002747323,0.028575465,0.0060079847,0.0051992885,0.016098803,0.00057799974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012149479,0.000012316443,0.0008482063,0.000034150733,0.000006543435,0.00022352312,0.0027411985,0.00021368732,0.00007703734,0.9494879,0.035591193,0.0107521005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016177127,0.00004635669,0.008250225,0.00094506657,0.00011268979,0.0003606225,0.011507806,0.003382184,0.0006230038,0.3748215,0.59951025,0.00027840235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98976654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99272776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15550499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15550499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27536583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9794945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2936308905","doi":"10.1515/sem-2019-0005","title":"“Do you understand these charges?”: How procedural communication in youth criminal justice court violates the rights of young offenders in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Semiotica","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Law; Criminology; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Political science; Government (linguistics); Procedural justice; Jargon; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.03728193686307406,"score_gpt":0.26644091481551485,"score_spread":0.22915897795244078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2936308905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9402193,0.0009953777,0.00032185542,0.017129606,0.00009930617,0.000084228785,0.00028608757,0.000017230037,0.040847078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99269825,0.0006922976,0.00018235193,0.0016854692,0.00001268324,0.000018874991,0.0001001089,0.000017785675,0.0045921747],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99272937,0.001249816,0.00020192121,0.00050927175,0.0022594712,0.0030500782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906296,0.0014222146,0.0013105129,0.00019546361,0.0037334373,0.0027087443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028577799,0.0003412895,0.0005773233,0.0017403963,0.032534804,0.009508931,0.0026460057,0.0017449304,0.0058300192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011544745,0.00038010714,0.00046094015,0.0034482186,0.010435859,0.002520749,0.0052736765,0.0052660927,0.00037473685],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008396827,0.00014147347,0.1682431,0.00013021704,0.000039806513,0.003092603,0.75901866,0.00034089218,0.00051228545,0.020953916,0.018916957,0.028526174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008010976,0.000021907528,0.084424876,0.00035404044,0.000034609282,0.00044858124,0.88334525,0.00046116541,0.00017688842,0.0013986822,0.029249256,0.00007670873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9951566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9977034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12900501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12900501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17086543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9360013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2941302010","doi":"10.3138/ijcs.57.x.71","title":"Morality Politics of Physician-Assisted Suicide: Comparing Canada and the United States","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Politics; Federalism; Public opinion; Supreme Court Decisions; Assisted suicide","score_opus":0.11213562162037746,"score_gpt":0.34194504174025325,"score_spread":0.2298094201198758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2941302010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5914289,0.0142818885,0.00032953176,0.083362214,0.0003470106,0.000050403,0.0006643014,0.000027391852,0.3095084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99017453,0.002320708,0.00011047499,0.0037302668,0.000037713613,0.000008494207,0.00008200148,0.000010161987,0.0035255188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940982,0.000770506,0.00009320464,0.00028974755,0.0020490636,0.0026993896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910062,0.0021487612,0.00078805507,0.0001536221,0.004015238,0.0018881097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026553757,0.00017863321,0.0004551857,0.0043134796,0.019063834,0.009933937,0.001314086,0.002167694,0.005119875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010959537,0.00021267716,0.00040947826,0.007080859,0.009721702,0.0012578215,0.0023764374,0.003714313,0.00016684341],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047299382,0.00018154884,0.05826275,0.00035017089,0.00018534827,0.0009184444,0.04938086,0.0019773357,0.0010076427,0.7650943,0.058629222,0.06353935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019707637,0.00012648517,0.4121388,0.0015081138,0.00041423045,0.00031075007,0.18530566,0.0024038348,0.0011099864,0.027638296,0.36848578,0.0003610017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9955627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18489116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18489116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18716927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9454107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943648049","doi":"10.14288/1.0378561","title":"Law's meanings for equality in the Americas : less impoverished visions for Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vision; Political science; Sociology; Geography; Anthropology","score_opus":0.021142343597196724,"score_gpt":0.23643100391503047,"score_spread":0.21528866031783375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943648049","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029824087,0.019106027,0.005658144,0.44564208,0.0022200507,0.00007867752,0.00038715245,0.000106376196,0.49697742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.803504,0.011091779,0.007051218,0.103957824,0.000914333,0.00010400223,0.00025455767,0.00017150391,0.07295069],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.991168,0.0015230392,0.00020940682,0.0009592813,0.003460019,0.0026803177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99098396,0.0019412838,0.00032383532,0.00037968368,0.004144906,0.0022264041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063881543,0.00068724016,0.0009535385,0.0038884713,0.03649566,0.02704982,0.0041050883,0.009149141,0.006352358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011690607,0.0004681636,0.0009266744,0.003967686,0.047344796,0.009584756,0.008548828,0.019012744,0.0004445494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050706262,0.000007466855,0.00015553841,0.000016038295,0.0000020851248,0.00004992321,0.0036986873,0.00010507759,0.000052864754,0.98254734,0.010153088,0.0032068195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003223488,0.000013432141,0.002098299,0.00043006244,0.000028070483,0.00011403642,0.018310731,0.0012223972,0.00019450895,0.5583825,0.41905692,0.00011681009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9865389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9880433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21605045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21605045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28161272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90927035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943671348","doi":"10.17648/eidea-18-2283","title":"A retórica da qualificação e as controvérsias de rotulagem","year":2019,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Eletrônica de Estudos Integrados em Discurso e Argumentação","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030945797899959385,"score_gpt":0.33248299701666845,"score_spread":0.30153719911670906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943671348","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.113289125,0.041899167,0.018314498,0.18855277,0.00240196,0.00006784356,0.00014762046,0.00007515724,0.6352519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9704717,0.007571556,0.0015242825,0.0054131756,0.0009400406,0.00004615847,0.000032360724,0.00006724888,0.013933503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9806834,0.0122549,0.0005980421,0.0019021151,0.003127669,0.0014337093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97228223,0.019758582,0.001981554,0.0033485943,0.0020201977,0.0006088812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019334657,0.00051157334,0.0007762919,0.0036429188,0.012142839,0.023784645,0.002462051,0.005839017,0.005489139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032836273,0.00037902198,0.00054165005,0.0046159457,0.08378245,0.014987158,0.006663219,0.007855105,0.0005333496],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044279595,0.0000043089176,0.00019677193,0.000036955786,0.0000021380872,0.000030540716,0.011840849,0.000048158214,0.00003256196,0.9832919,0.001786219,0.002725102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011909037,0.00002418297,0.0016904216,0.00090198556,0.000017557097,0.00014707136,0.05350939,0.00039928206,0.00040208318,0.7110687,0.23179284,0.000034549113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008721594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012142564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023784645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010416529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009411092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10225266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943983938","doi":"10.1515/9781773855714-012","title":"10 Stormy “Whethers”: Ethical Challenges of a Clinician in Academia","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Original jurisdiction; Political science; Court of record; Law of the case; Appeal; Tribunal; Certiorari; Remand (court procedure); Discretion; Court of equity; Precedent","score_opus":0.07598239443720001,"score_gpt":0.28938048534260236,"score_spread":0.21339809090540235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943983938","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040289676,0.00899329,0.0016379217,0.9062824,0.0029899215,0.000015487149,0.0000097201655,0.000028427396,0.07601382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32684216,0.008094208,0.0038126863,0.5363517,0.0038235958,0.000102695136,0.00002608801,0.0001255635,0.12082124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9788006,0.01265043,0.00034598206,0.0012320039,0.0038452134,0.0031257798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98262054,0.008972853,0.000525788,0.00052306254,0.0025563706,0.0048013227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017434651,0.0004234066,0.00053651363,0.0009748933,0.0312541,0.01785567,0.0025665432,0.015569769,0.0056858966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025302412,0.00032361632,0.00035805412,0.0009417143,0.065733545,0.010241948,0.008295618,0.019707346,0.0016279233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010511516,0.000028750332,0.00044961806,0.000049045895,0.000003842143,0.0007146263,0.04027421,0.00011506616,0.00016508816,0.7465368,0.19305682,0.018595545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017029635,0.000022905982,0.00040860486,0.00044690233,0.0000049062282,0.0005414237,0.062261656,0.0002235375,0.00011685031,0.23436955,0.70155513,0.000031466785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1475045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3490665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1475045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02624084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08861566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29329187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944179347","doi":"10.1017/s0003055400400572","title":"The Politics of Pragmatism: Women, Representation, and Constitutionalism in Canada. By Alexandra Dobrowolsky. Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford University Press, 2000. 320p. $24.75 paper.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Politics; Representation (politics); Pragmatism; Political science; Economic history; Sociology; Economics; Law; Philosophy; Democracy","score_opus":0.014677506223990775,"score_gpt":0.27515452127969314,"score_spread":0.26047701505570237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944179347","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033016154,0.82402885,0.00038042173,0.13318309,0.0012703825,0.000023342156,0.00032265674,0.000026879292,0.037462674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18732543,0.71524954,0.0009337712,0.010008225,0.0016188247,0.00006733477,0.0003216111,0.00009953483,0.08437574],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861526,0.0003462348,0.000037038655,0.00012927082,0.0005724024,0.00029981445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802834,0.0007096006,0.00018835333,0.00006200049,0.0006711722,0.0003405558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019574799,0.0011470148,0.00069277803,0.0035992586,0.010497904,0.0074455147,0.0017467837,0.0030769052,0.008653696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043595894,0.00076224015,0.00034121258,0.010651456,0.015157774,0.0036810962,0.0018861423,0.0036588102,0.00093944697],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048549722,0.00004434665,0.0021518082,0.00086019514,0.000044369826,0.00020287918,0.015137909,0.00064745184,0.00018646932,0.15606605,0.7177834,0.10682659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035001853,0.000012658262,0.02104592,0.0020326828,0.000049910846,0.00017270907,0.011319984,0.0005025399,0.0002078423,0.054487042,0.9100593,0.0000743001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96385074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9838037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08182036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08182036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06609733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59365106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944477221","doi":"10.36646/mjlr.18.1.rights","title":"Rights and Judges in a Democracy: A New Canadian Version","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law reform; Political science; Democracy; Law; Criminology; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.008673878071632155,"score_gpt":0.22287664739559415,"score_spread":0.21420276932396198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944477221","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010207639,0.008105943,0.0046966113,0.12508693,0.0021016505,0.00005427415,0.00041716488,0.000051982326,0.8492778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7701346,0.010361924,0.0072340267,0.03221835,0.0015566493,0.00012894227,0.00028987366,0.0001619019,0.17791373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943832,0.00094516703,0.00013609632,0.0007802758,0.0022263972,0.0015288282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99560416,0.0012148967,0.00014609665,0.00029946453,0.002202732,0.00053268665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038554987,0.0005862413,0.0005512562,0.0025663297,0.020133995,0.014858566,0.0019633688,0.005190065,0.010091001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008452314,0.00035840966,0.0005672065,0.0039885654,0.028524,0.006937045,0.0037413163,0.008375577,0.0005918829],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037320065,0.0000023901748,0.00017241349,0.000013330855,0.0000018300047,0.000032843305,0.0027096928,0.00011479947,0.000022379229,0.9807118,0.013500337,0.0027144065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026482994,0.00000903453,0.0019531874,0.00025548716,0.000026068883,0.00008994447,0.007851485,0.00083855505,0.00010001176,0.2820098,0.706778,0.00006184081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97548383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9821829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11400646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11400646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12577043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8271786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944752172","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1326","title":"Constitutional Cases 2015: An Overview","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Premise; Charter; Scope (computer science); Law; Federalism; Political science; Economic Justice; Constitutional law; Roberts Court; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.1288022743471286,"score_gpt":0.3887176382874412,"score_spread":0.2599153639403126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944752172","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0140489265,0.7085471,0.0032708638,0.021658551,0.0052705887,0.00016378683,0.0026614869,0.00019202312,0.24418665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19710715,0.7052121,0.005056359,0.016891185,0.0053038215,0.00023256388,0.0063706157,0.00021897959,0.06360731],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951728,0.0006677785,0.00056688493,0.0005003835,0.0023479548,0.0007441694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99623847,0.0019299464,0.00046669532,0.00017195012,0.00082047324,0.00037241526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005068691,0.000528793,0.00064469187,0.01826091,0.003357558,0.006973084,0.0014500743,0.002285743,0.009875313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010476212,0.0006962811,0.00085893663,0.015683902,0.0029512066,0.005858694,0.0029590265,0.0026689821,0.0016828657],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028263146,0.000072300885,0.0033567832,0.0020097557,0.000043647717,0.00031304822,0.0017258867,0.0010721253,0.00051503076,0.54310733,0.19799767,0.24975811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024535966,0.000016358023,0.006616665,0.0017725545,0.000012924892,0.00015097961,0.0005676701,0.000106169085,0.00012251353,0.008143917,0.9824667,0.000021192647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.116233386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15803435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.116233386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015480877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01681241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23111367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944851300","doi":"","title":"Canadian Rights: A jurisprudential Canadian “Style”?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fundamental rights; Charter; Political science; Law; Human rights; International human rights law; Federalism; Reservation of rights; Law and economics; Rights of Nature; Linguistic rights; Right to property; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.0099812534809071,"score_gpt":0.27586362770013045,"score_spread":0.26588237421922334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944851300","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062459297,0.013395163,0.0052302983,0.36174968,0.0044812327,0.000049463113,0.00032838347,0.00007700992,0.6084428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6690121,0.023078784,0.009269348,0.0945768,0.002430395,0.00011629439,0.00034370198,0.0002920262,0.2008806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921481,0.001221875,0.00014580014,0.0009638083,0.0039559957,0.0015643638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943797,0.0012161956,0.00016419675,0.00031275445,0.0031566618,0.00077043206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004550162,0.0005722877,0.0005376521,0.003296166,0.021648575,0.016475314,0.0025133863,0.0048452555,0.010263044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011712014,0.00039417803,0.00038824038,0.0057665887,0.03512411,0.006793798,0.0031692628,0.007882798,0.0008391365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005337566,0.0000036139104,0.00019553753,0.000026355538,0.000002698315,0.000026866921,0.004245163,0.00004890094,0.000048546677,0.9336671,0.053539444,0.008190437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010367227,0.0000070605647,0.0017837957,0.00024925306,0.000013688291,0.000065684064,0.009106259,0.0002585502,0.0001332387,0.10212593,0.88620037,0.000045797176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.974151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98252964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11298217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11298217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13519852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81974685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945852264","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Form of Government: Reconciling Parliamentary Sovereignty and Executive Dominance under a System of Constitutional Supremacy","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Parliamentary sovereignty; Law; Politics; Separation of powers; Government (linguistics); Sovereignty; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04790771194960826,"score_gpt":0.29581992758801046,"score_spread":0.2479122156384022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945852264","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14790425,0.0018789751,0.012557882,0.02112283,0.00024440067,0.00014719502,0.00040375174,0.00006929474,0.8156715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9787299,0.0005432551,0.0030849394,0.0005572941,0.00003140017,0.000031457508,0.000057742578,0.000022978618,0.01694108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.992338,0.0014790839,0.00012796254,0.00072375895,0.002928899,0.0024023522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964998,0.0008416811,0.00025519804,0.00034728355,0.0015014164,0.00055462576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004204601,0.00039546317,0.0005973644,0.0027765753,0.012795553,0.010748874,0.00165093,0.0015060138,0.0061681326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014840215,0.0002926507,0.00034665028,0.0054713525,0.01996373,0.003086515,0.003473885,0.002257859,0.00024986587],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011921087,0.0000030312863,0.0008114392,0.00001575438,0.0000043617815,0.000023543123,0.00219169,0.0003791521,0.00007969938,0.98960644,0.0014788866,0.0053939875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000116856,0.00007562323,0.04355483,0.00032010252,0.00019488345,0.00021005563,0.027607119,0.0077785216,0.0012213845,0.5774474,0.34129232,0.00018088416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96032786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9824111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89300305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.106996976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13639578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77632105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946685998","doi":"10.17072/1995-4190-2018-42-558-586","title":"ON LEGAL DEFECTS AND LEGAL DEFECTOLOGY","year":2018,"lang":"ru","type":"article","venue":"Вестник Пермского университета Юридические науки","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Political science; Business; Medicine","score_opus":0.020232993343168252,"score_gpt":0.29306776981049937,"score_spread":0.2728347764673311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946685998","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19645625,0.051647075,0.122220226,0.08750015,0.0012999424,0.00024379173,0.00040910725,0.00030891906,0.53991455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9654615,0.011099396,0.012050522,0.0026625954,0.0007531691,0.00013948698,0.00018400943,0.00006639981,0.0075829662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99330527,0.0031262576,0.00040893303,0.00088116,0.0018150196,0.00046340062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9668873,0.024690105,0.0036563056,0.0014105202,0.0025703264,0.0007853652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054435823,0.00052205933,0.0005516436,0.0061647487,0.0025361641,0.00534941,0.001965245,0.0033226947,0.0059791454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013492436,0.00028540526,0.0005319896,0.003997858,0.051781762,0.011067363,0.005820465,0.0046540825,0.00050105294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005495239,0.000014270131,0.0011179663,0.00012089167,0.0000036436006,0.00014667427,0.004178744,0.00032212795,0.0000765148,0.9847322,0.0011143885,0.008166993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008842298,0.000039251776,0.0018975047,0.00043598402,0.000009767614,0.0005964591,0.0037221469,0.0011329876,0.0002214573,0.9374904,0.054417733,0.000027524862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019289091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007297957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061647487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045943456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026305616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033334434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946696988","doi":"","title":"Refractive and Prismatic Analysis in Implicit Comparative Constitutional Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional law; Law; Section (typography); Comparative law; Political science; Law and economics; Common law; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03598531139458209,"score_gpt":0.35768702638174826,"score_spread":0.32170171498716615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946696988","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019364215,0.0036304235,0.07230457,0.017231995,0.00038811454,0.00006385123,0.00026501284,0.00012139537,0.8866304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9355454,0.002035214,0.019132437,0.0017596204,0.00029188945,0.00015427417,0.00019594138,0.00014032335,0.040744916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936486,0.003061515,0.00015065786,0.0006435216,0.0019194921,0.0005761333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948166,0.0028716994,0.0002722195,0.00086829736,0.0010114071,0.00015981485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006437011,0.0005053443,0.0004964534,0.0044887937,0.0064063156,0.0070928577,0.0024109774,0.0021162229,0.013713475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01702427,0.0004066991,0.0006805352,0.006134925,0.034556884,0.01296905,0.0058328165,0.0043967823,0.0007776275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.822684e-7,4.7064816e-7,0.00001286321,0.000005012325,4.777038e-7,0.0000026539722,0.00020799726,0.0000461582,0.0000054481325,0.9989856,0.00020888762,0.0005234921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006421773,0.0000026899272,0.0001090342,0.000034316137,0.000004062126,0.000012176439,0.0005664296,0.000515923,0.00006314322,0.9737768,0.024904722,0.000004325096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07638341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.082612485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07638341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01720631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012141541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15187764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946936291","doi":"10.7202/1059410ar","title":"LA SUPRÉMATIE DES DROITS ET LIBERTÉS DE LA PERSONNE ET LA QUESTION CONSTITUTIONNELLE AU CANADA","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010249393386095701,"score_gpt":0.2630690891841845,"score_spread":0.2528196957980888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946936291","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056248564,0.015802901,0.006454013,0.10125793,0.0012116993,0.00010428072,0.0009272943,0.00013748276,0.81785583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6663417,0.008802402,0.0035278932,0.014144613,0.00029722374,0.00012334636,0.00033128564,0.00010033698,0.30633122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99302095,0.001041258,0.00013944531,0.0007912859,0.0027566936,0.002250379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968137,0.00074037723,0.0001428714,0.00020792107,0.0016069585,0.0004882836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002732831,0.0003805832,0.0005182751,0.0014346451,0.016166132,0.010878889,0.0014336496,0.0038860135,0.011478705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006463465,0.0004336131,0.0005222094,0.0022163137,0.015040058,0.00209763,0.0025163335,0.0056853355,0.0006909072],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019563533,0.000008237714,0.00072356267,0.000035334557,0.000007125409,0.00006245422,0.0026431675,0.00034960403,0.00016859829,0.9705758,0.018175408,0.007231099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045842175,0.000023484514,0.010013129,0.0004599595,0.000044158107,0.00008264751,0.005174214,0.0011948574,0.0006174351,0.10256918,0.8796509,0.00012421446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98816246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98929834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11992028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11992028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22488649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8700866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947185286","doi":"10.7202/1059229ar","title":"Growing Pains and Other Things: The Supreme Court of Canada and the Supreme Court of the United States","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Original jurisdiction; Certiorari; Political science; Institution; Majority opinion; Supreme Court Decisions","score_opus":0.01286390832678744,"score_gpt":0.22254052298883437,"score_spread":0.20967661466204693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947185286","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04909607,0.22791004,0.0010823209,0.21399693,0.0019729456,0.000024080424,0.00026528374,0.000039826064,0.5056125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8736874,0.045642193,0.00060742925,0.020649781,0.00093800924,0.000018765155,0.0001321694,0.000053254185,0.05827109],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996092,0.00055336877,0.00003656364,0.00024226865,0.0017181298,0.0013576731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974185,0.00071207364,0.00015848952,0.000046696634,0.0010823307,0.00058185303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001413542,0.00034275223,0.00038976973,0.0029191787,0.020008765,0.011485438,0.0015705341,0.003340515,0.003779661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005752354,0.0002280309,0.00026811066,0.006373933,0.025113672,0.0039929305,0.0027331105,0.005076462,0.00027874068],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014832725,0.000009693006,0.0011395407,0.000035364334,0.000007729804,0.00018182806,0.012730135,0.00017503185,0.00006112361,0.913138,0.057846595,0.0146602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023744677,0.000016571414,0.017834479,0.00095507666,0.0000351171,0.00018537302,0.046670157,0.00041177412,0.00022188001,0.1725538,0.761009,0.00008296659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9801066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98984003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.112241164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.112241164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13965166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81437045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947263645","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0030","title":"Access to <i>Charter</i> Justice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitutionalism; Principle of legality; Political science; Economic Justice; Law; Constitutional law; Intervention (counseling); Law and economics; Sociology; Democracy; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.07309585026656665,"score_gpt":0.29028857881969994,"score_spread":0.2171927285531333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947263645","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025540635,0.0031267891,0.0010925485,0.0064222193,0.00029016516,0.000025631844,0.00017518057,0.000047146423,0.98626626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31862596,0.012900278,0.0026804039,0.00598679,0.0004106389,0.00004459486,0.00032855562,0.00017577526,0.658847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975381,0.00025448547,0.00003494678,0.00021542894,0.0013004306,0.000656588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986553,0.0003364308,0.00004053015,0.00008104287,0.00071116386,0.00017551062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001488631,0.00042026464,0.00031703056,0.002287688,0.011831263,0.009918946,0.001334432,0.0016556486,0.035107635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002846696,0.00024590956,0.00028504603,0.002838254,0.012359297,0.00251884,0.0017819325,0.0034128698,0.0024087697],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028085014,0.000005363328,0.00013735062,0.00003119569,0.0000011147225,0.000045943998,0.0033528667,0.000115971976,0.00009303265,0.9325101,0.049175605,0.014528717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000209124,0.0000038059206,0.0008847837,0.00020808297,0.00000432077,0.000034208464,0.0022737107,0.00017533258,0.0001402492,0.034432847,0.9618225,0.000018149378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9556166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97264194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07217115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07217115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08778391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5236408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947879797","doi":"10.24908/iqurcp.13296","title":"Debating the Supreme Court of Canada's Role in Governing Minority Groups with the Charter","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Inquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Political science; Constitution; Legislature; Politics; Democracy; Separation of powers; Judicial review; Sociology","score_opus":0.05325250732231088,"score_gpt":0.31854142160180643,"score_spread":0.2652889142794955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947879797","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059808236,0.014241672,0.004425513,0.45139095,0.0030581926,0.00012757638,0.000258702,0.000102947546,0.46658632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8235962,0.0053105727,0.003298246,0.07053085,0.00077095104,0.000070102025,0.00008854614,0.000061590144,0.09627298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886933,0.0018399232,0.00020233338,0.0009819609,0.004537489,0.0037448264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903565,0.0041737235,0.00033881993,0.00030331736,0.0036354007,0.0011921537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010178825,0.00032663907,0.0003930008,0.0015466477,0.033011485,0.016206376,0.0033062762,0.0081280945,0.0034413794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018966617,0.00037883865,0.0004315657,0.0021527368,0.017225131,0.0041769566,0.0034597244,0.009464277,0.0002777774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024664461,0.000012397079,0.0016512511,0.00004832172,0.000008732065,0.00035954683,0.008773168,0.0005099298,0.00030850593,0.9109902,0.060462352,0.016851002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006096654,0.00004175302,0.008992858,0.00070307875,0.00008697547,0.00017060702,0.019562466,0.0034436132,0.0017959346,0.09983525,0.86507773,0.00022875878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9875881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.994755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14372636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14372636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23581982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9931561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948255521","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198827580.013.11","title":"Proportionality and Limitations on Freedom of Speech","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Premise; Adjudication; Appeal; Freedom of expression; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Human rights; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.07223746628615864,"score_gpt":0.2518485576328827,"score_spread":0.1796110913467241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948255521","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0213132,0.009175227,0.023906244,0.034542907,0.00077249896,0.00004542298,0.00006812077,0.00005190966,0.91012436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9429923,0.003743095,0.0028703439,0.0051725423,0.001365785,0.00012002236,0.00007255729,0.00007578586,0.043587573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97510827,0.01433312,0.00081789517,0.0019997188,0.006300642,0.0014403311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9717628,0.021910623,0.0007831402,0.002692937,0.0023843474,0.00046614985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018439367,0.00039225337,0.00074961106,0.002456268,0.0043216893,0.010595583,0.0017264656,0.0032780624,0.009032469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03428501,0.0003122286,0.0006064785,0.0015928335,0.041884862,0.012254398,0.006475191,0.008322804,0.0009600853],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023602872,0.0000014479367,0.000014983174,0.000007633479,7.2834405e-7,0.0000063252446,0.00055492576,0.00004930517,0.000016960554,0.9972485,0.0005641271,0.0015326857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059364243,0.000007724244,0.00011136674,0.00016701156,0.0000035273865,0.000022977707,0.0006727351,0.00025937115,0.00015661046,0.94748855,0.051097143,0.000007107708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026353537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015403096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018439367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058915718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004715327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09751785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948737149","doi":"","title":"The Empirical Gap in Jurisprudence: A Comprehensive Study of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Empirical research; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11382085104936428,"score_gpt":0.3538755267127173,"score_spread":0.24005467566335303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948737149","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59538853,0.06573333,0.0011928672,0.104594655,0.0003673508,0.00016882477,0.0019477115,0.000054955723,0.23055172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795831,0.008905601,0.0004984026,0.0036164622,0.00008307526,0.000034852837,0.00023079077,0.000038018807,0.007009846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98536056,0.0018035438,0.00030792938,0.0010218599,0.007746222,0.0037599832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94836384,0.021897413,0.0022031986,0.001015227,0.022654405,0.0038659452],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008833284,0.00040993327,0.0014315766,0.01286686,0.04056366,0.019812161,0.0034023423,0.0040719765,0.00485433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04856268,0.0007506183,0.00062744634,0.029294237,0.018461496,0.004698854,0.0039151604,0.0046945806,0.00028348548],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012468555,0.00020240355,0.076375276,0.00084249204,0.00025837516,0.0009920155,0.08510495,0.0028290562,0.00046195806,0.68771553,0.073370636,0.071722716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000086916414,0.000072090326,0.42744756,0.0029518737,0.0005418417,0.00029451208,0.14142141,0.0040755714,0.00057027926,0.066097714,0.3561003,0.00034003163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9973821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95943636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2744714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.46043018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84151036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948979530","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3367097","title":"The SNC Lavalin Controversy: The Shawcross Principle and Prosecutorial Independence","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Philosophy; Political science; Psychology; Law and economics; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.007378854473775637,"score_gpt":0.2787928174836397,"score_spread":0.2714139630098641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948979530","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09733207,0.0017478041,0.007367504,0.067740984,0.00057380885,0.000029593863,0.00011303623,0.00003282685,0.82506245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9504675,0.00035399082,0.0009776168,0.0122816935,0.00068933296,0.00003806965,0.000032970547,0.000035658773,0.035123155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931297,0.0024676302,0.00019376318,0.0011802273,0.0017202429,0.0013084584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98603916,0.009091825,0.00071628636,0.0014981161,0.0017710548,0.0008835236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01005077,0.00027927483,0.00093319465,0.0016160712,0.0088794585,0.010275744,0.0015420421,0.009663944,0.0107936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026744595,0.00037485707,0.00061767583,0.0012797042,0.018635746,0.0062584598,0.0054241875,0.011993962,0.0013095707],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018417817,0.00001260974,0.00026506628,0.0000073765655,0.0000039530178,0.00003327437,0.00050791336,0.000071877985,0.000045138702,0.99290633,0.0041251956,0.0020027638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055328623,0.000021938342,0.0014207277,0.000096374824,0.000030044952,0.00006764048,0.001411835,0.0007507751,0.00042828533,0.9574694,0.038219824,0.000027780574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0133070545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023702394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98669297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039095986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008191404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05315423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949892658","doi":"","title":"Reference re Senate Reform and the Supreme Court of Canada's Clarification of the Constitutional Procedure for Reforming the Canadian Parliament's Upper House","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and business review of the Americas","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Law; Political science; Supreme court; House of Representatives; Legislature; Politics","score_opus":0.023475867484959497,"score_gpt":0.2669595955756173,"score_spread":0.24348372809065782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949892658","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026376365,0.022076044,0.0021437053,0.43466926,0.0076886117,0.0004500269,0.0029666037,0.00020636141,0.5034229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30187637,0.005620171,0.00258385,0.29785675,0.0026989735,0.0003466051,0.0005407804,0.00022768193,0.38824883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97841716,0.0025464671,0.00080555375,0.0017754349,0.0077668973,0.0086883735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98739886,0.0055530583,0.0003273539,0.0004439298,0.005050137,0.0012266965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008841423,0.0013932899,0.0017504302,0.004831221,0.05015504,0.019749578,0.007860908,0.03825496,0.012216059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026007714,0.0015706029,0.0020467844,0.006529734,0.016272895,0.0045220265,0.0033278593,0.02652555,0.0013439219],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057179674,0.00004062666,0.00074641744,0.00010353782,0.000060150578,0.0003627658,0.0076208306,0.0005393701,0.00029174917,0.6497543,0.33615005,0.0042729303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001686315,0.00004307526,0.0131626325,0.00062586897,0.00027221857,0.00012837278,0.011891198,0.0006412019,0.0012138145,0.07885826,0.89254963,0.00044518014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9910965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8443072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15569279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2126314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9792767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951270789","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avz015","title":"The Magnetism of Moral Reasoning and the Principle of Proportionality in Comparative Constitutional Adjudication","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Adjudication; Law; Constitutionality; Jurisprudence; Constitutional law; Politics; Constitution; Political science; Law and economics; Normative; Moral reasoning; Sociology","score_opus":0.039323926762791665,"score_gpt":0.3511782601717788,"score_spread":0.3118543334089871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951270789","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.080613375,0.0053033186,0.29984066,0.056265563,0.0013511498,0.00021819038,0.00011197767,0.00010683822,0.556189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97487634,0.00046238216,0.01854806,0.0014040205,0.0004419021,0.00019460249,0.000019500014,0.00002994649,0.004023338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94615114,0.046834566,0.0009796212,0.0016314219,0.0032918858,0.0011114153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9652945,0.02835685,0.0014899579,0.0023717529,0.0019929665,0.00049397786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037456848,0.00030597957,0.000636435,0.002658445,0.0053480677,0.008563916,0.0014658532,0.0029888789,0.003621424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045424607,0.0006041425,0.0007699692,0.0015884088,0.062428482,0.011303822,0.007151204,0.0061863665,0.0002904714],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004178784,0.0000020336654,0.000031976924,0.000005321711,0.0000016193289,0.0000083096165,0.0003155112,0.00009093251,0.000015542393,0.99858224,0.00013522079,0.00080714584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012222743,0.000007635074,0.00008139614,0.00003180283,0.0000030971526,0.000014836222,0.00019047462,0.00056924496,0.00006381859,0.993986,0.0050343554,0.000005133499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035904825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025974608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037456848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009064019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044750604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19809318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951276840","doi":"10.82308/55286","title":"«Charter» compliance and the Canadian parliamentary process","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Parliament; Legislation; Legislature; Law; Humanities; Politics; Art","score_opus":0.037216967397224646,"score_gpt":0.2719312482249659,"score_spread":0.23471428082774126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951276840","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26390204,0.0009957195,0.0056833886,0.02773453,0.0001966384,0.00043711448,0.0003890265,0.00018327142,0.7004783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9533157,0.000276635,0.0015744017,0.0012597177,0.00002138011,0.00007068175,0.00008283196,0.000026819836,0.043371823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96843797,0.006927304,0.0008024471,0.002257259,0.013368967,0.008205965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9779563,0.0070145116,0.0022713637,0.0016302223,0.009443712,0.0016839259],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020567412,0.0002661308,0.00040747193,0.002164745,0.020833945,0.010297604,0.002545668,0.003463379,0.008901501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04779291,0.00042428076,0.0004714291,0.0039305203,0.012812785,0.0029100054,0.0044233818,0.0032844064,0.0007363131],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070197486,0.000060760136,0.011052888,0.000113923306,0.000016877244,0.00024616142,0.041688405,0.0013584093,0.00066024455,0.88762677,0.012716143,0.04438926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021307923,0.00020175842,0.19261453,0.00060385437,0.00011578788,0.00023587544,0.07268095,0.0063347793,0.0026880212,0.1032729,0.62061495,0.00042356152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9691106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9701348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88672763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11327239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2006542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82185256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952048328","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v9i2.8076","title":"A Wall Between the \"Public\" and the \"Private\": A Comment on Highwood Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses (Judicial Committee) v Wall","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Law; Political science; Supreme court; Judicial opinion; Charter; State (computer science); Prima facie; Judicial discretion; Accountability; Judicial activism; Politics","score_opus":0.045239658811208436,"score_gpt":0.3119905186116866,"score_spread":0.26675085980047814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952048328","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062886745,0.0038850247,0.0009348219,0.85884666,0.004395512,0.00006324927,0.00010597371,0.000040857598,0.0688412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35388345,0.0019622755,0.0007807022,0.5946267,0.0026287276,0.00009656604,0.00005178626,0.00012165369,0.045848113],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923942,0.002023676,0.00023958323,0.0009043424,0.0013052445,0.0031329812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884366,0.008411595,0.0004026821,0.00023508306,0.0013784169,0.0011357663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007829586,0.00061466784,0.00077255664,0.0008889993,0.041426454,0.012054915,0.004348732,0.03888829,0.0032718393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016221778,0.0012004457,0.00106771,0.0012066718,0.017242188,0.004608592,0.0040685665,0.038822096,0.00048229867],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008637116,0.00007380429,0.0031729527,0.00014240741,0.00004558547,0.0067480695,0.08316642,0.0003426586,0.001333191,0.42214978,0.47597364,0.006765084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063030755,0.000074818185,0.006739917,0.000828073,0.00009677319,0.0008391927,0.11071979,0.0006787673,0.0021611024,0.024643933,0.8528518,0.0003029186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56930137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7204497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56930137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022279365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024616692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8664702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952268257","doi":"10.82308/29171","title":"Understanding judicial appointments reform: comparing Australia, Canada and the United States","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Nomination; Judicial reform; Political science; Appeal; Politics; Judicial activism; Judicial review; Judicial discretion; Judicial independence; Law; Power (physics); Judicial opinion; Public administration","score_opus":0.09584545262438166,"score_gpt":0.27157642207007837,"score_spread":0.17573096944569672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952268257","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8045784,0.003328617,0.00039159975,0.014544299,0.00005391452,0.00006696103,0.0002784356,0.000016566337,0.17674115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99259996,0.0012114802,0.00013524947,0.0009811666,0.000010770002,0.000019545858,0.00008215705,0.000005661429,0.004954092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99663454,0.0004042635,0.000056581957,0.00020750597,0.0010880553,0.0016091092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958372,0.00078826153,0.0005174007,0.00012156616,0.001899099,0.0008365516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016353398,0.00015601657,0.0004787089,0.003017701,0.008194197,0.0064816154,0.0011853323,0.0012848568,0.004261977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008996701,0.0001598668,0.00022986607,0.0058722184,0.007006529,0.0022684745,0.0022877946,0.0018720299,0.00018578238],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000211294,0.00020719023,0.16536438,0.00030513282,0.000114718336,0.00082031527,0.13686422,0.004129437,0.000766794,0.59200984,0.0204069,0.078799695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008038668,0.0000831655,0.6351868,0.0006124934,0.00022208686,0.00009838799,0.18711807,0.0046985513,0.00047433705,0.028954204,0.14237593,0.00009549359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9863478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99354506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8882799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11172007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11157027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8105897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953156344","doi":"10.82308/51410","title":"Inviting judicial review: A comprehensive analysis of Canadian appellate court reference cases","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Newfoundland and Labrador","keywords":"Constitutionality; Supreme court; Political science; Politics; Law; Delegation; Judicial review; Delegate; Government (linguistics); Separation of powers; Standard of review; Legislation; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.06615853605251082,"score_gpt":0.29245090338279583,"score_spread":0.22629236733028502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953156344","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26384997,0.046015784,0.0038911072,0.022369599,0.0002818998,0.0009778157,0.004490593,0.00019244805,0.6579308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91150284,0.022168182,0.0030552167,0.0044563757,0.00017379144,0.00032127727,0.0017814549,0.000082102204,0.056458835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9653017,0.0026964166,0.00081742974,0.0014232157,0.02119495,0.008566219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96362025,0.01250665,0.0027114637,0.001136405,0.017855741,0.002169498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010083388,0.0010265181,0.0012055442,0.020337963,0.017988829,0.015692525,0.004561558,0.00442907,0.0077559617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047506247,0.0009367106,0.0016509664,0.028717702,0.0074877217,0.002887823,0.0027941098,0.00275593,0.00076553045],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012413129,0.0001444458,0.031074064,0.0011733593,0.00024904334,0.0023107494,0.025874684,0.007622475,0.00068255747,0.7520456,0.09812602,0.08057294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001479637,0.00013660543,0.25088367,0.002846164,0.0013006665,0.0013821194,0.043340724,0.010920512,0.0010592425,0.075001486,0.61239225,0.0005885539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.992906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9967961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7946894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20531055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3034367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9217271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953263262","doi":"","title":"Gay rights in Canada and the US","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Docs.school Publications","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.03345103433157495,"score_gpt":0.2852426916050365,"score_spread":0.25179165727346153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953263262","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33843234,0.036933426,0.0003020359,0.1550371,0.0009610723,0.000076008866,0.0018044894,0.000060312894,0.46639326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9068004,0.00842974,0.00021105261,0.011319798,0.0001314442,0.000026122221,0.00021632438,0.000030932693,0.072834164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950493,0.0003204971,0.000083159845,0.00020725376,0.0013411653,0.0029986792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99531734,0.0007290391,0.00023790727,0.00010302667,0.001581871,0.0020309086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018258794,0.0002676601,0.00057322555,0.002999525,0.031452138,0.009969483,0.0015082159,0.0035311782,0.015052432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056835054,0.000277618,0.00035885806,0.00658104,0.011379038,0.0019459669,0.0027709445,0.0051218625,0.0005754464],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000112494876,0.00012933766,0.028678577,0.00019113588,0.000034586432,0.0006646221,0.038247056,0.000642048,0.0002832488,0.7330718,0.13393624,0.0640089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081820814,0.000048441365,0.15763155,0.0010584206,0.00009021,0.00023517874,0.123813786,0.00077665783,0.00043679506,0.034040805,0.6816023,0.0001840438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99815935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13769342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13769342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2992793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99904037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953433140","doi":"","title":"Language Rights Remedies in the Supreme Court of Canada: Invisible, Gentle, or Stern Hand?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Charter; Sociology","score_opus":0.019054061268048466,"score_gpt":0.2625804448931148,"score_spread":0.24352638362506632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953433140","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05370768,0.01632282,0.0020434628,0.5684,0.0024701,0.00010453038,0.00038611624,0.00013014117,0.35643512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77515334,0.0054309587,0.0018232907,0.15555544,0.0012994522,0.00007513959,0.00014811146,0.000077708355,0.06043652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9826943,0.0017084891,0.00042394674,0.0018175024,0.005859639,0.0074960757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842806,0.004764254,0.0008632035,0.00053047814,0.005319328,0.004242192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009654032,0.0004792447,0.0007405974,0.002244654,0.037880067,0.024826054,0.0042117983,0.0158651,0.008965341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02624459,0.0007708949,0.00075929746,0.0022127281,0.026820382,0.0057318606,0.005673678,0.020722203,0.00055821176],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024373507,0.00003167668,0.0019519989,0.000042135936,0.000018336325,0.00057146634,0.005714748,0.00025852336,0.00028847106,0.8910632,0.086922154,0.013112964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013217248,0.00005069195,0.01663622,0.0013044577,0.0001329639,0.00026614615,0.02144061,0.0022033013,0.001017607,0.20726846,0.7490693,0.00047815178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9782193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9889932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14811632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14811632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23744191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9880643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953628719","doi":"10.21307/connections-2019-002","title":"Signed Networks for the US Supreme Court Overturning its Prior Decisions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Connections","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Citation; Supreme Court Decisions; Context (archaeology); Phenomenon; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04347248348762899,"score_gpt":0.3069129672295506,"score_spread":0.2634404837419216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953628719","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8910366,0.0015617394,0.030537892,0.005050774,0.00012210588,0.00005210044,0.0016225402,0.00013818633,0.06987804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99419975,0.00026879457,0.0027457904,0.000042411775,0.000028072305,0.00001654236,0.00034787803,0.000013571657,0.0023371861],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986052,0.0006668732,0.000095897805,0.00022591063,0.00032610583,0.00008002237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9632718,0.028089806,0.0040267077,0.001448523,0.0023789862,0.0007842587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025761297,0.00014354236,0.000257116,0.0067971973,0.0017323105,0.0046200133,0.0005767816,0.0009623629,0.011306806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048311684,0.00011751431,0.0002411737,0.0062267277,0.0015491144,0.005204653,0.0015725093,0.00075036293,0.00051235873],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023521522,0.000097189186,0.0822363,0.00023334447,0.00008832608,0.00059583643,0.0076933876,0.027566964,0.0012206151,0.7628235,0.007902183,0.10930714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003089115,0.00011574437,0.09317383,0.00031608745,0.00015643777,0.00069266115,0.0093635265,0.11623253,0.0018480496,0.7168689,0.06109131,0.00011015708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007616264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010976259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011306806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002481002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083250063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03782499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953966777","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1357","title":"Reconciliation and the Constitution: A Transcript of the Roundtable","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; McGill University; University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Constitution; Indigenous; Human rights; Amnesty; Political science; Law; Politics; Supreme court; State (computer science); Indigenous rights; Refugee; Sociology","score_opus":0.07135062782059755,"score_gpt":0.32737763228149425,"score_spread":0.2560270044608967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953966777","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021579642,0.014101094,0.012367299,0.67026305,0.02517499,0.0010262302,0.0014034623,0.0002359636,0.25384837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3103213,0.0073009124,0.0078658415,0.36584947,0.0068508675,0.002611508,0.0008195255,0.0007554454,0.2976251],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95510906,0.024285689,0.0016628928,0.0025811596,0.00998829,0.0063728937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95913476,0.03445351,0.00068298005,0.0014957557,0.0034978783,0.0007352208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034461528,0.00064789114,0.0009726616,0.0020139012,0.025542628,0.01290992,0.004193368,0.023590384,0.009637966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06744996,0.0013820555,0.0016665156,0.0033245808,0.012539746,0.008192016,0.008541152,0.036090452,0.0022378785],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042475185,0.000038811693,0.0001562285,0.00023895995,0.000013393864,0.0010981564,0.046709366,0.00027552745,0.0007121546,0.5766185,0.36486286,0.009233587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022014196,0.000021615966,0.0005425945,0.00046635864,0.00001485934,0.00015246002,0.0152315,0.00021284404,0.0005935973,0.03288443,0.94976765,0.00009015298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08597917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10528883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08597917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021895278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027972454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18225217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954057586","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1359","title":"Land Acknowledgment, Scripting and Julius Caesar","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Canadian Mennonite University; University of Manitoba; Harvard University","keywords":"Honour; Oppression; Constitution; Presentation (obstetrics); Supreme court; Political science; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.039322145840312135,"score_gpt":0.31222321921292673,"score_spread":0.2729010733726146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954057586","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033567768,0.047161162,0.0065516923,0.20706114,0.0035462356,0.000033121207,0.00006365913,0.000098510995,0.70191675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8301627,0.0135754775,0.0023854952,0.027107103,0.0013341112,0.0000497023,0.00003843543,0.00014066271,0.12520634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99617285,0.0023053011,0.00008687645,0.00033391494,0.0007404674,0.000360645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99666613,0.0021452073,0.00022414979,0.00027472628,0.0004440744,0.00024555385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036666356,0.00022019552,0.00020451393,0.0006107227,0.0076526026,0.0063883355,0.00081316475,0.001611889,0.0025539973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007504846,0.00021320628,0.000118092714,0.0007770468,0.029434733,0.0035921652,0.0022676804,0.0043921717,0.00068833743],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000512511,0.000003915179,0.00014945521,0.00002340411,0.000001251161,0.00007884039,0.011014315,0.00005982625,0.00006210388,0.94873494,0.032519262,0.007347486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004992976,0.00000988186,0.00056459656,0.00022937536,0.0000027867165,0.00012437772,0.013385684,0.00012296703,0.00028081716,0.12957169,0.85568565,0.00001717155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04158828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07704551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04158828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006876323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007617258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082692385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954913440","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3492658","title":"Introduction: The 'What' and 'Why' of Constitutional Dialogue","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; McGill University; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; Kelowna General Hospital; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.009084466870500539,"score_gpt":0.245378384108145,"score_spread":0.23629391723764445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954913440","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024732617,0.033184066,0.009997399,0.7286823,0.041011427,0.00005545721,0.0013796547,0.00021788753,0.18299855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27768707,0.028949602,0.008368174,0.32594237,0.15464523,0.0004578258,0.0013130129,0.0010542719,0.20158239],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964644,0.0019106739,0.00011831725,0.0006162234,0.0006443926,0.0002459482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98695403,0.010446205,0.00036310687,0.0005891317,0.0012449535,0.0004026808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003844081,0.0007206962,0.00089458673,0.0013492717,0.0043245503,0.010874996,0.0022359765,0.009738822,0.034634218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012723163,0.00056827656,0.000670773,0.0024246166,0.015462899,0.011688162,0.0022959253,0.012353157,0.0070689674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000137213765,0.000011184695,0.00007494386,0.00019827101,0.0000032060552,0.000018493454,0.0020947678,0.00005267169,0.00006969373,0.7296246,0.26036415,0.0074741524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013392385,0.000011253055,0.00058757246,0.0007465969,0.0000077588675,0.000065089465,0.0030091284,0.00027962629,0.0000966064,0.30698702,0.68817204,0.00002406481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069080666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071892086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034634218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037561988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041847094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.115862966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955814727","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1351","title":"Keeping the Scale of Justice Balanced – Québec Justices of the Peace and Judicial Independence","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Safeguarding; Judicial independence; Misconduct; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Legislature; Independence (probability theory); Constitution; Separation of powers; Government (linguistics); Balance (ability); Administration (probate law); Judicial activism; Judicial review; Supreme court; Psychology","score_opus":0.04058203566118073,"score_gpt":0.32967354935368126,"score_spread":0.2890915136925005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955814727","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062311262,0.029331848,0.0019286328,0.09758357,0.0013187771,0.00013913163,0.0009001508,0.00005777633,0.8064289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87436855,0.006138535,0.001341367,0.01237679,0.00032854686,0.00009894153,0.00017932936,0.000030934123,0.10513711],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99519277,0.0011692828,0.00010376649,0.00046709907,0.0017792345,0.0012878398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946418,0.0011941192,0.00030104083,0.0002744565,0.002775615,0.0008130041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036928689,0.00022542945,0.00037165158,0.0022178488,0.013724057,0.008714115,0.0009346651,0.0021193903,0.0139757395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008385309,0.00020048201,0.00028742952,0.002431329,0.006279152,0.0022311383,0.0016032401,0.003421738,0.0005166577],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074356,0.00005466796,0.010277793,0.00021235937,0.000057749465,0.0004135221,0.007997498,0.0005780156,0.0006174764,0.7079123,0.17658381,0.09522043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043381227,0.00003851513,0.06264663,0.0006895564,0.00004811128,0.00017158427,0.007313479,0.00043999066,0.00038659072,0.027985612,0.90016174,0.000074903095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9662712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9882138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9408212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059178833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.081114054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42937446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2957568653","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0022","title":"Unity in the eye of the beholder? Reasons for decision in theory and practice in the Ontario Works program","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Corporate governance; Front line; Public relations; Scale (ratio); Judicial opinion; Political science; Sociology; Law; Management; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.019062088792294,"score_gpt":0.2965428445027758,"score_spread":0.2774807557104818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2957568653","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55674314,0.0038811555,0.021972846,0.12204835,0.0003271318,0.0001870914,0.00010311964,0.00008209975,0.29465503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942321,0.00032606107,0.0010224866,0.0005101122,0.000011710753,0.000022562092,0.000007560843,0.000015053175,0.0038523453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9817923,0.009401424,0.00050833693,0.0013800936,0.0036807728,0.0032372056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97232234,0.018184038,0.0021039937,0.001733131,0.0026693535,0.0029871115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022405641,0.00030520398,0.000493063,0.0021762725,0.029499663,0.018554213,0.0023546908,0.003478229,0.0043904874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03847792,0.00055721926,0.00047063685,0.0023986788,0.09032171,0.009462918,0.007852887,0.0039027932,0.00024830087],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021116432,0.00002206202,0.008691568,0.0000803314,0.000008429758,0.00036148098,0.37081337,0.00039275322,0.00013055922,0.60289174,0.0034196244,0.0131668765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025066905,0.000025929343,0.013101941,0.00067839224,0.000025594041,0.00013652335,0.63453496,0.0016106361,0.00032953298,0.19935945,0.15009233,0.000079634345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82615536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8931189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82615536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11883274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11539002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8621959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2958512376","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198841395.003.0003","title":"Emergence and Diffusion","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Political science; Politics; Charter; Democracy; Law; European union; Human rights; Convention; Constitutional law; Normative; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; International trade","score_opus":0.02982851269237283,"score_gpt":0.22734237684104505,"score_spread":0.19751386414867222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2958512376","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0521686,0.0067872824,0.045377262,0.012100136,0.00043374006,0.00014560291,0.00029284437,0.00020453015,0.88249004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8954872,0.0054753497,0.012538717,0.0010474811,0.00041207293,0.00021384587,0.0003113529,0.0002425237,0.084271416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972095,0.0008754933,0.00012563851,0.0008250847,0.00067531626,0.00028898087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99624014,0.0020342502,0.00031973823,0.00068067916,0.00046385895,0.00026135973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025685448,0.00040890853,0.00054414687,0.002719773,0.003280553,0.009247025,0.0010611133,0.0019862829,0.01817534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009155299,0.00033334774,0.0005174685,0.0029699493,0.011046705,0.013803847,0.005667414,0.0028494312,0.0024054789],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068797367,0.000008450849,0.00080003525,0.000040179715,0.0000038981543,0.000074046715,0.0045517497,0.00015348822,0.00015542816,0.97540367,0.0017362067,0.01706588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010700712,0.000025169096,0.0021172636,0.00016537093,0.000009123035,0.00035751748,0.006378726,0.0011873886,0.00027119578,0.6975055,0.29195443,0.000017657441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022435563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018785184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01817534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045760097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019361455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06080252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2959601507","doi":"10.12728/culj.12.4","title":"Docket Control in the Apex Court Exercising Constitutional Review","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Christ University Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Jurisprudence; Constitutional court; Law; Political science; Legislature; Arrears; Abandonment (legal); Economics; Constitution; Debt","score_opus":0.023600890525098027,"score_gpt":0.2763493385152141,"score_spread":0.2527484479901161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2959601507","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2163368,0.0048122173,0.033166006,0.08553123,0.001195565,0.00084025017,0.00020772396,0.00036317852,0.6575471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9513946,0.00070392655,0.006341378,0.01096617,0.0004820961,0.00022404268,0.000042018,0.000056291323,0.029789472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9370286,0.0280101,0.002998258,0.00754261,0.013906297,0.01051414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8925558,0.06986839,0.0064695096,0.007409552,0.014802402,0.008894347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.065903835,0.0002646627,0.0007504316,0.0028430247,0.011170739,0.03294692,0.003080166,0.009098892,0.008781126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.104304254,0.00087025674,0.00062159006,0.0024627903,0.01286276,0.008271144,0.011057451,0.010433815,0.0012437393],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032945412,0.00006391223,0.0056174737,0.000048593494,0.000020365294,0.0008248919,0.004782413,0.0008396191,0.00062173686,0.9575242,0.011166878,0.018457007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015494297,0.00033357716,0.015805354,0.00056970475,0.0001209032,0.00083826104,0.013217854,0.0081428755,0.002381485,0.53198814,0.42612252,0.0003245018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025266906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039545488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.065903835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014067476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05143782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34853697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2961110486","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1343","title":"Constitutional Constraints on Electoral Reform in Canada:Why Parliament is (Mostly) Free to Implement a New Voting System","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Charter; Constitution; Political science; Voting; Electoral system; Constitutional amendment; Government (linguistics); Law; Electoral reform; Public administration; Democracy; Law and economics; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.0490881735934815,"score_gpt":0.3052383308283495,"score_spread":0.256150157234868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2961110486","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29411155,0.008425007,0.0034696972,0.23199746,0.00066079077,0.00038303607,0.0012945099,0.00015812932,0.45949984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9631441,0.0017874866,0.0015765724,0.014037284,0.00013004136,0.000064263564,0.000149037,0.00004837517,0.019062743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9739654,0.0032219433,0.00070207904,0.001986062,0.0093146395,0.010809841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.974708,0.006172066,0.0010852662,0.0013767316,0.012199621,0.004458395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017319325,0.00029767537,0.0009809892,0.0026519545,0.02518707,0.013969115,0.0036283163,0.0037609518,0.0063720094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04147283,0.0006952785,0.0006361169,0.0039881263,0.017994191,0.0032762152,0.004013208,0.007398667,0.00043193856],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001029015,0.00005385699,0.010203262,0.00018276578,0.00007104365,0.00024421734,0.008779755,0.0019041398,0.0010458259,0.9155585,0.030774133,0.031079607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056934793,0.00015440103,0.13487451,0.0010852229,0.00041092993,0.00020028024,0.021759385,0.0055446005,0.0027600282,0.12421964,0.7078771,0.0005445225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9940078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9968265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20248197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20248197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30786464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9250079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2961112438","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0012","title":"Amending the Constitution of Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Constitutional amendment; Political science; Law; Politics; Constitutional law; Constitutional economics; Ratification","score_opus":0.04041237117811698,"score_gpt":0.23210714202846913,"score_spread":0.19169477085035214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2961112438","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009769229,0.015128678,0.0013777727,0.032009322,0.0016684482,0.000095821524,0.0005519619,0.00008427935,0.9393145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56028396,0.023121828,0.0043774787,0.019324351,0.00084332825,0.000112085465,0.00057335873,0.00011694581,0.3912467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969298,0.00037101502,0.000056585388,0.00025002434,0.0015426516,0.00084985286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983358,0.00027457517,0.000041817173,0.00009191732,0.0010759261,0.0001800493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017378945,0.000278997,0.00025848334,0.0022861918,0.010277285,0.0063178865,0.0010230059,0.0020608804,0.008542965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003955475,0.00018989242,0.00023329708,0.0026880878,0.011904002,0.0011787843,0.0016959034,0.0030955488,0.000651774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004671421,0.000003576037,0.00019320216,0.000039741855,0.0000023990683,0.00007112867,0.0023388101,0.00027369263,0.00012633453,0.9425923,0.042376224,0.011977893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005595937,0.0000043909363,0.0011204497,0.00017275909,0.0000074062395,0.000031089887,0.0011663785,0.00016878964,0.00013561854,0.025775133,0.971393,0.000019513214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9768221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98205274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10030451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10030451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15443008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72776353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963003061","doi":"","title":"THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA AND THE PROVINCIAL COURT IN CANADA","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Original jurisdiction; Court of equity; Court of record; Majority opinion; Political science; Constitutionality; Certiorari; Concurring opinion; Jurisdiction; Law of the case; Remand (court procedure); Precedent; Constitution; Constitutional court","score_opus":0.014306860440836372,"score_gpt":0.22803156217914847,"score_spread":0.2137247017383121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963003061","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051820934,0.049097005,0.0018026966,0.15544854,0.0017603413,0.000073935014,0.0007281897,0.000069511916,0.73919874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8776743,0.0169436,0.0014002679,0.019210763,0.0005771659,0.000039594634,0.0002530114,0.00004473031,0.083856635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99296063,0.0009366371,0.00014269179,0.00050313224,0.002553201,0.0029036496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991863,0.0021071157,0.00041061512,0.00019748624,0.0039359666,0.0014857766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003039001,0.00022251798,0.00045427846,0.0026095468,0.029821511,0.012510925,0.0018460207,0.0041143466,0.006764979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015129343,0.0004036618,0.0003261188,0.006287354,0.016928501,0.002803183,0.0021829896,0.0058990833,0.0004046745],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010517012,0.000005818713,0.0015232508,0.00003296736,0.0000062608706,0.00012894717,0.0025193393,0.0002643494,0.000052948493,0.9422632,0.045017358,0.008174973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003344536,0.000017043232,0.021028075,0.0006965791,0.000053416596,0.00016075866,0.009435142,0.0012271906,0.00022935784,0.14134954,0.8256663,0.0001031096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99392843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9973189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19121197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19121197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3042435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9380795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963567466","doi":"10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1066","title":"Equality in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oñati Socio-legal Series","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Jurisprudence; Sociology; Humanities; Gender equality; Gender studies; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.016721215287915966,"score_gpt":0.26389952975075237,"score_spread":0.2471783144628364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963567466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06664669,0.00983378,0.0027225316,0.10495658,0.0015548997,0.0001905908,0.000997995,0.00010165559,0.8129952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7243337,0.0051922817,0.0026889308,0.021436576,0.0001993167,0.000088565845,0.00037190912,0.00006757831,0.24562117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99274045,0.0005277867,0.00016299107,0.00090628996,0.002501352,0.0031612422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99683315,0.00047982828,0.0001255887,0.00016437363,0.0014408054,0.0009562152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023391808,0.0003613156,0.0005236619,0.0014402145,0.035415307,0.009719012,0.0017168965,0.004106761,0.018347584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066678664,0.00035889942,0.00046153372,0.0028246443,0.010314956,0.0021571324,0.005169896,0.005608978,0.00071310526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012616571,0.000012285676,0.0015857366,0.00005351164,0.000006747994,0.00024725628,0.0044376845,0.00024166568,0.00014747166,0.9370394,0.038334176,0.017881468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027834783,0.000022993096,0.009984641,0.00026452058,0.000029216428,0.00017091556,0.008332327,0.00066712126,0.00041586405,0.046849325,0.9331497,0.00008556955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9951556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99689484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15920764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15920764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3335921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97519994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963996696","doi":"10.1093/icon/moz057","title":"Is the Commonwealth’s approach to rights constitutionalism exportable?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Constitutionalism; Normative; Jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.031378958354921875,"score_gpt":0.31864168189163056,"score_spread":0.2872627235367087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963996696","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.090500504,0.0014381062,0.028353337,0.14121652,0.0005823794,0.000056283672,0.000085843065,0.000054077842,0.737713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98494786,0.0005080606,0.0021688056,0.0036472343,0.00039403577,0.00005880925,0.00002501914,0.00003007194,0.008220087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9814386,0.008576422,0.00075648364,0.0021958977,0.0049652467,0.0020673107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9710586,0.017672257,0.0019934585,0.0046678665,0.0034716006,0.0011361917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022687728,0.00027150253,0.00094035774,0.002231152,0.00487935,0.012416415,0.0018925501,0.005471194,0.005933673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04254915,0.00035610897,0.00079422427,0.0016784064,0.053383037,0.0140878605,0.008432077,0.0090944385,0.00044695355],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018425108,0.0000025729976,0.00009091511,0.0000037555185,0.0000013519673,0.000011223836,0.0002865245,0.00005110567,0.000012421024,0.99867404,0.00022700758,0.0006373587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011156757,0.0000096821095,0.00043605614,0.000051682127,0.0000062474487,0.000040538194,0.00057901314,0.00046234412,0.000061548955,0.9857987,0.012535264,0.000007757878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012717193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011131541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022687728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010983332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011009646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11998564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964917791","doi":"","title":"Complementarity: The Constitutional Role of the Senate of Canada","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complementarity (molecular biology); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.013618278548489715,"score_gpt":0.2266752809809839,"score_spread":0.2130570024324942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964917791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14906542,0.0056642084,0.0012902711,0.034432184,0.00020485088,0.000048195954,0.0006239694,0.00002252207,0.80864835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9704706,0.0010427154,0.00027320394,0.0021286511,0.00006564552,0.000019766305,0.000061616534,0.000019459821,0.025918359],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929328,0.001465537,0.00010276612,0.0007556524,0.0013947239,0.0033485873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99345833,0.0023370192,0.00035285798,0.00037897317,0.0027267158,0.0007461442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036574355,0.00033813476,0.000869273,0.002940361,0.024078168,0.011245101,0.0015803394,0.0027967948,0.013530277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011823406,0.0003590548,0.00039514498,0.005911887,0.016425103,0.0042965105,0.004627673,0.0035678977,0.00035868137],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004212,0.000008302054,0.0020624762,0.000024883597,0.000018829003,0.000067764144,0.003054308,0.0002397659,0.00006663274,0.9823745,0.007006349,0.0050340653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013800764,0.000055791297,0.0529238,0.0006743551,0.00035307775,0.0001925155,0.03887953,0.0020607337,0.0011707436,0.40007484,0.5032438,0.00023273837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9752181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9887433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.076017186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.076017186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12455006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55154586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965004679","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1334","title":"The Pragmatic Limits of Access to Justice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Computer science; Internet privacy; Law","score_opus":0.09009961212703126,"score_gpt":0.37789147344065155,"score_spread":0.2877918613136203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965004679","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027378617,0.0066470644,0.012674621,0.10363973,0.0003285517,0.00007490642,0.00016160526,0.000046027682,0.84904885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96673375,0.0018309532,0.0029566125,0.012478814,0.00037437136,0.0001838363,0.000061293984,0.000052130275,0.015328183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9666154,0.012081314,0.0010997823,0.0038285556,0.011947049,0.004428054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98471457,0.008848238,0.0007449631,0.0018611533,0.002633568,0.0011975621],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01573228,0.0005216331,0.00092950935,0.002648233,0.014470651,0.019172926,0.0027797378,0.007846532,0.00669922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027196543,0.00079606514,0.00074980396,0.0016433375,0.10149774,0.01445118,0.01558081,0.01154358,0.0005858913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021643334,0.0000027291774,0.00004608431,0.000010796999,0.0000019586998,0.000015465028,0.0011732904,0.000027362492,0.000036974878,0.9969528,0.00071456464,0.0010158817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012362667,0.000005859816,0.00031227653,0.00009572786,0.000006493708,0.000039463615,0.0017775411,0.0001072407,0.000058277514,0.96092016,0.03665253,0.000012003489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12570477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12616345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12570477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029200869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03819653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24994618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965375933","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0046","title":"The Politics of Constitutional Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Politics; Political science; Law; Democracy; Jurisprudence; Ideology; Constitution; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.043375877205431804,"score_gpt":0.25232024629130895,"score_spread":0.20894436908587716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965375933","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035758826,0.037231103,0.004272217,0.084113486,0.00094748795,0.000027940794,0.00011547489,0.000050600367,0.86966586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6995011,0.028095834,0.0036329315,0.02410969,0.002766307,0.0001776177,0.00019295965,0.00016524352,0.24135835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941958,0.0028836,0.000105288156,0.00054828275,0.0017167451,0.00055030955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99550396,0.0031248534,0.00015704201,0.00041416712,0.0005573095,0.00024271726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006233412,0.000327703,0.00043351972,0.0018844357,0.006574637,0.01231623,0.001063673,0.0035009156,0.008252312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008187608,0.00028364963,0.00023635181,0.0020116896,0.052428145,0.0056365607,0.0027194845,0.006316866,0.0011047649],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.3327637e-7,8.5324064e-7,0.000008268018,0.000005359383,2.9188175e-7,0.0000042090032,0.00032872858,0.000032813863,0.000008746646,0.99482346,0.0036971706,0.0010897224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004678509,0.0000038342555,0.00011833694,0.00019419873,0.0000015890251,0.000012243855,0.000932129,0.00015206811,0.000050623254,0.69412965,0.30439565,0.0000050492085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047874928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04389526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047874928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020957513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013488254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15205812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966424497","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0005","title":"The British Legal Tradition in Canadian Constitutional Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Preamble; Constitution; Assertion; Law; Section (typography); Political science; State (computer science); Jurisprudence; Engineering","score_opus":0.03087835502405944,"score_gpt":0.22495928893047948,"score_spread":0.19408093390642003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966424497","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006778354,0.025074465,0.00066850235,0.023087738,0.0006067753,0.000014253693,0.00014066427,0.000040563154,0.9435887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6623184,0.045819808,0.0019683605,0.009954677,0.0007051985,0.00004960568,0.00025971222,0.00015510418,0.278769],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963898,0.00061169645,0.000080317426,0.0003062573,0.0019124396,0.00069947925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99678123,0.0012840877,0.00011901589,0.00017175985,0.0012874675,0.00035634096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022869208,0.0003078446,0.00035437485,0.004142524,0.013428786,0.008726076,0.00092097366,0.0016406766,0.014981153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044777906,0.0003164034,0.00018013583,0.007696058,0.01740569,0.0021994787,0.0016784574,0.0034763287,0.0011067062],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005963137,0.000004574796,0.00019663197,0.000072537536,0.0000022834604,0.00006757104,0.0063075074,0.000109523615,0.000054611683,0.9367401,0.040727593,0.015711062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004185802,0.0000031394334,0.0014874628,0.0003365854,0.0000056014883,0.00005393456,0.0022537466,0.00013118396,0.000048261772,0.032426294,0.9632342,0.000015382771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9651115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9764139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10438541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10438541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0757792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75737274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966769105","doi":"10.60770/z1qm-3c78","title":"A historical analysis of the substantive principles of fundamental justice under Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Mount Royal University Institutional Repository (Mount Royal University)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Political science; Law; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.01392457169266955,"score_gpt":0.2065943635396434,"score_spread":0.19266979184697383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966769105","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023402976,0.027640708,0.011803446,0.058376055,0.0015745598,0.00013254421,0.0006738106,0.00007958429,0.87631625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8156134,0.033741858,0.009854048,0.0121426275,0.0005951244,0.00011948857,0.00046302783,0.00017535932,0.12729509],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901724,0.001874669,0.00021536418,0.0010453496,0.004529262,0.0021629815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99332994,0.0023496423,0.00030034292,0.0002285019,0.0033429023,0.0004485947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007608238,0.0005168188,0.00045711847,0.005258747,0.021716947,0.011661592,0.0018052962,0.0027833036,0.004063729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011082701,0.0006051859,0.000407395,0.0065325806,0.03544812,0.003943567,0.002059798,0.008440026,0.00044155418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037972895,0.0000035162384,0.00018692901,0.000027246131,0.0000016882879,0.000058951853,0.0064895987,0.00015653876,0.00007952359,0.976906,0.009571642,0.006514538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049252453,0.0000119596925,0.0052711754,0.00044723556,0.000010523807,0.00010192677,0.0068441336,0.0005451249,0.0003590013,0.105889566,0.88043547,0.000078967256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.977612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98157907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18148598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18148598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15443991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94936025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2968113158","doi":"10.3968/11058","title":"Comparison of Two Approaches to Methodology of Legal Theory","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Positivism; Legal positivism; Epistemology; Criticism; Descriptive research; Sociology; Legal research; Law; Philosophy; Legal realism; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.3123650236014809,"score_gpt":0.409534434116056,"score_spread":0.09716941051457512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2968113158","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020260477,0.013051721,0.7601797,0.032842215,0.001708966,0.0005169418,0.00027799982,0.00042098027,0.17074093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.512662,0.012008274,0.4450453,0.0060324646,0.0013970892,0.0036791058,0.00041460025,0.0005425807,0.018218553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.90720797,0.0675275,0.0028618413,0.0023562931,0.018310249,0.0017362018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9214011,0.053693365,0.004008149,0.009959903,0.009300891,0.0016365804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.059095226,0.0008192706,0.0014539805,0.013073086,0.0030058688,0.013259756,0.0042557465,0.003583034,0.0061405036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08028864,0.0009090434,0.0014766825,0.0086718,0.021315012,0.01235367,0.0082199145,0.004751992,0.0010265607],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011521447,0.000022333033,0.00031081503,0.00011499235,0.000015051152,0.000012652458,0.0017634219,0.0002280332,0.000044230626,0.98571163,0.0006720997,0.011093279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058047503,0.000081254744,0.0011234937,0.0006173361,0.000026087318,0.0001417896,0.0033475913,0.003836407,0.00035546234,0.93170327,0.058679502,0.00002975631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027049142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032727662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059095226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011746493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013142709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31252915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W296842398","doi":"","title":"Constitutionalism, Judicial Review, and Progressive Change: A Rejoinder to McClain and Fleming","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Law; Judicial review; Political science; Warren Court; Scrutiny; Social rights; Economic Justice; Constitutional law; Constitutional theory; Sociology; Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.059933132087847646,"score_gpt":0.3676803833157433,"score_spread":0.3077472512278957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W296842398","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019005502,0.04104199,0.0028591736,0.91801924,0.006056488,0.00004993411,0.000038296803,0.000047159763,0.029987145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19866776,0.029777939,0.008507477,0.66845506,0.049980026,0.000596477,0.00007541718,0.00022856612,0.043711226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94126695,0.026147915,0.002740536,0.007844926,0.018302582,0.0036970377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87610596,0.10249445,0.002785051,0.005671635,0.0107508795,0.0021919927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0457607,0.00061170367,0.0018167252,0.0036497512,0.011978986,0.02139544,0.0056373896,0.045116514,0.0024366248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12940592,0.0009963006,0.0015464763,0.0024002881,0.0558061,0.01711729,0.005717842,0.032160006,0.00066769397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011520677,0.000013225463,0.00007521486,0.00006606,0.000010222945,0.000103796905,0.0017012459,0.00014126694,0.00004715677,0.8775164,0.11199098,0.008323011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007061877,0.000022170294,0.0003606816,0.00048299387,0.000016893024,0.00012622976,0.00090013817,0.00049829413,0.0001252381,0.5523871,0.4449528,0.000056839966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03371362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033638615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0457607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019210553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029391827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24200863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2968498775","doi":"10.4324/9781315565408-19","title":"The Right to Self-Government and Protecting the Vulnerable: Balancing Rights under Canadian Constitutional Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitutional law; Government (linguistics); Political science; Self-incrimination; Constitutional right; Constitution","score_opus":0.010106074337473745,"score_gpt":0.23810770598037126,"score_spread":0.22800163164289752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2968498775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08548865,0.0074031153,0.005013648,0.140854,0.00046486838,0.00009815257,0.0003151232,0.000038031274,0.7603243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94397604,0.003092705,0.0024504552,0.010285591,0.00015039845,0.00006275234,0.000058140246,0.00004587926,0.039877992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9798687,0.0047141076,0.00030526787,0.0013582769,0.00629197,0.007461752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98838437,0.00530391,0.0003265831,0.000674457,0.0036421774,0.0016685021],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013033113,0.0006080093,0.0008406963,0.004881325,0.03768042,0.019843567,0.0033924652,0.008633931,0.009241562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02014883,0.00055233913,0.0006860982,0.005502097,0.05657737,0.0077815857,0.006350631,0.008979397,0.00038076684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009605016,0.000006772335,0.0003348686,0.000020751228,0.0000035219755,0.000034531316,0.0065358505,0.00012535471,0.00006340163,0.9852512,0.0038405105,0.0037736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000558904,0.000020734527,0.0089811385,0.0006547559,0.00006572135,0.00009393989,0.033557758,0.0009665745,0.00048401993,0.68767893,0.2673016,0.00013894116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9851127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9927649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15520582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15520582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2655177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97984153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969292910","doi":"10.5509/2019923419","title":"Japan’s Agenda Setting to Lower the Voting Age from 20 to 18","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific Affairs","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democratic legitimacy; Legitimacy; Voting; Democracy; Political science; Political economy; Public administration; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.024401926106838185,"score_gpt":0.27368633255107633,"score_spread":0.24928440644423813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969292910","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6803837,0.001603091,0.007514164,0.0208011,0.000752491,0.00018965716,0.00017745659,0.000105345294,0.28847298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844721,0.00031513948,0.0023784381,0.0018530538,0.00013573111,0.00005018212,0.000047508256,0.000019141255,0.010728602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979286,0.0006397614,0.00012212168,0.00024889834,0.00027926886,0.00078120833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962494,0.0008053965,0.0006638308,0.00028204793,0.0010501056,0.0009492592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053563565,0.00020922095,0.0001876902,0.0009454497,0.0037130096,0.0026039283,0.00046717754,0.0010719085,0.0055680317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007981902,0.00018186841,0.0003837078,0.0006020964,0.0021926372,0.0018743621,0.0023904173,0.0020781495,0.00056957715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045373724,0.00066857826,0.13834122,0.00075351505,0.00010461865,0.0013076091,0.08315812,0.00232215,0.015677014,0.48634478,0.043074135,0.22779453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017946953,0.0007614351,0.3968875,0.00052007206,0.00026475053,0.0002946478,0.035477508,0.0028491376,0.009073961,0.07250166,0.48101544,0.00017434293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023694107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05317114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023694107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035062928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007004167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047112346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969457853","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199485079.003.0018","title":"Appointments to the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Commission; Economic Justice; Prime minister; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.02971664640538418,"score_gpt":0.22069211093571797,"score_spread":0.1909754645303338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969457853","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016956387,0.010859644,0.0006699796,0.023990234,0.00095891015,0.000038642014,0.00033613533,0.00006023224,0.94612986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61977774,0.009851666,0.00079656916,0.010347213,0.00040583147,0.00003444611,0.00025765965,0.000076988385,0.3584519],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957802,0.00036285678,0.00005714402,0.00038544214,0.001491759,0.0019225682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985769,0.00026795416,0.000048093243,0.000051571675,0.00069841254,0.00035714972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010454257,0.00030279264,0.00030367266,0.0016210907,0.025953965,0.0076525006,0.001376939,0.002188947,0.011234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004526968,0.0002976765,0.00024918787,0.0029609068,0.011346224,0.0014109067,0.0020689731,0.004266245,0.0009798515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075844305,0.0000066211646,0.00047266835,0.000030269663,0.0000034580758,0.0001856795,0.00861667,0.00018816069,0.0000991818,0.88813215,0.08952006,0.012737479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050688523,0.000004408316,0.00308101,0.00017499988,0.000008680046,0.00005911371,0.005318162,0.00020700789,0.00010087527,0.019474635,0.97153586,0.000030137471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9911957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99496233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14785625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14785625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18003394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98836595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970537003","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v12n3p156","title":"Burden and Standard of Proof in Election Petitions without Criminal Allegations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Allegation; Law; Declaration; Extant taxon; Reasonable doubt; Presumption; Political science; Economic Justice; Burden of proof; Election law; Law and economics; Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.017910543186816605,"score_gpt":0.30571694179740555,"score_spread":0.28780639861058893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970537003","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10439741,0.008068486,0.183615,0.072578795,0.0036948533,0.0010655856,0.00074757094,0.0004208625,0.62541145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90805495,0.0022000636,0.049917493,0.009118227,0.0033302933,0.0011767459,0.000282398,0.00019815854,0.025721688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8581329,0.051097237,0.01969457,0.016106863,0.047633883,0.0073344745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.71317804,0.17742322,0.019950876,0.055521835,0.030230062,0.003696046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.099279925,0.00089049654,0.0022972038,0.007476518,0.00771147,0.022996033,0.0053165634,0.017423281,0.010027307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29724237,0.0020788547,0.0022147072,0.0032682943,0.03970423,0.028069716,0.0117891915,0.017815731,0.0037994788],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004186393,0.00005463919,0.0007451179,0.00006506522,0.000015071215,0.00012268215,0.0009018232,0.00019215139,0.00032436792,0.98837435,0.0018273349,0.0073355306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013579045,0.00025666007,0.0035364341,0.0007823167,0.0001283362,0.00065675523,0.0010190385,0.0021122177,0.001983913,0.9307136,0.058513593,0.00016145658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033586128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024438598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.099279925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006799296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01140331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971392639","doi":"","title":"Why Fundamental Constitutional Principles Should Prevent Ontario From Interfering With Toronto’s Election","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Law; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.057884562189686836,"score_gpt":0.3009605299240338,"score_spread":0.24307596773434698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971392639","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07154292,0.0030575132,0.0038914925,0.3652854,0.0014319831,0.00017751391,0.0010666255,0.00016395573,0.55338264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87766546,0.001020516,0.0023553611,0.03480371,0.0003213463,0.00008343904,0.00019960344,0.000077818404,0.08347284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885719,0.0015829573,0.00027761847,0.00091119495,0.0033789552,0.0052774404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98883164,0.002584675,0.00066632376,0.0008868669,0.005007884,0.0020225346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075922115,0.00023923434,0.00032416164,0.0006390708,0.016589584,0.009043304,0.0018241111,0.00670472,0.009852833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021882605,0.0004847705,0.0004422442,0.00095338956,0.015758632,0.0031704362,0.0018436224,0.0062650912,0.0010890799],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035343754,0.000013011915,0.0026789762,0.00006548586,0.000017337072,0.000110567955,0.0049880226,0.00035205862,0.00033828485,0.8834571,0.102368444,0.0055752634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001225104,0.000039130813,0.023747278,0.0002875679,0.000056396642,0.00007107602,0.008249946,0.00074675627,0.0010777438,0.09681604,0.86863554,0.00014988218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94206434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98267925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0875571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0875571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13626282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6352742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971590923","doi":"10.21991/cf29387","title":"Ford and Irwin Toy 30 Years Later: A Conversation with Justice Montigny","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Charter; Trilogy; Appeal; Political science; Economic Justice; Politics; Context (archaeology); Sociology; History","score_opus":0.013361277003212772,"score_gpt":0.247270545106371,"score_spread":0.23390926810315824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971590923","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028496603,0.016140169,0.00016471004,0.95223016,0.0077728974,0.000014260562,0.000039285933,0.000014123054,0.020774769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06783117,0.008139792,0.0004137142,0.81866896,0.0042321854,0.00004704933,0.00002832289,0.00008248773,0.100556254],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936068,0.0024188533,0.00010918109,0.0008457125,0.0013782514,0.001641185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99487925,0.00254635,0.00012740021,0.0000834054,0.00083060394,0.0015330438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061332765,0.00072662777,0.0010310492,0.0011486931,0.041287027,0.012087516,0.0023611228,0.021219535,0.0076428032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012901585,0.0005449319,0.00069532846,0.0013809772,0.01656574,0.008233944,0.0039529847,0.032362998,0.0011103479],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022861674,0.000040875737,0.00045628086,0.00004302656,0.000009631042,0.00090081984,0.035325952,0.000043282296,0.00015301652,0.07991469,0.8759875,0.007102167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000892783,0.000011784995,0.00056231755,0.00014588107,0.000005349574,0.00018387217,0.02169428,0.00003802531,0.000084396954,0.0056618713,0.97157186,0.000031321393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5782691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7240267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5782691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036555406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026692046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8484291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972952445","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3351","title":"Assessing the Impact of Unilingualism at the Supreme Court of Canada: Panel Composition, Assertiveness, Caseload, and Deference","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Collège de Bois-de-Boulogne; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Supreme court; Assertiveness; Law; Framing (construction); Political science; Exploratory research; Fluency; Empirical research; Social psychology; Sociology; Psychology; Social science; Epistemology; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.059984036293032214,"score_gpt":0.34163936495036534,"score_spread":0.2816553286573331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972952445","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9920426,0.00011000992,0.00017811607,0.0005782996,0.000004662035,0.000017974697,0.00009238513,0.000003914376,0.0069721197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991178,0.000030522,0.00010642674,0.00006133546,0.0000036494898,0.000004383307,0.000063425825,0.0000015471875,0.0006108401],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921111,0.0019613781,0.00021684909,0.0006443097,0.0033159454,0.0017504118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9594778,0.01612928,0.0080708405,0.0013560585,0.007942255,0.00702381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007012625,0.00028847688,0.00039611047,0.0017747553,0.0052183922,0.0032013466,0.0012724282,0.00059491326,0.003917949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04524986,0.00018082764,0.0003048835,0.0016393134,0.0038490873,0.0012408302,0.0026445265,0.0014896664,0.00020755928],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029859578,0.00017044996,0.95771486,0.00003609677,0.0001060593,0.00027186496,0.014671471,0.00074115186,0.0009020764,0.0046926388,0.0008088251,0.019585945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013305682,0.00008664603,0.9861356,0.000031357416,0.000039146307,0.00005351645,0.010016046,0.00079949864,0.00052137714,0.0008359451,0.0014433172,0.000024222909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.931705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97379375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.068295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028798133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039027184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20894605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973016045","doi":"","title":"The Rule of Law All the Way Up","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitutionality; Supreme court; Constitutional law; Adjudication; Presumption; Common law","score_opus":0.013960536004371488,"score_gpt":0.2755018074631724,"score_spread":0.2615412714588009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2973016045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013376368,0.0055619567,0.014874103,0.1547001,0.0014186025,0.000082714985,0.0003419983,0.0002606162,0.8093835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.775188,0.0048008547,0.008984841,0.02722204,0.00056847464,0.00006530725,0.0001831402,0.00024039738,0.18274692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99149877,0.0011756468,0.00014989039,0.0011200242,0.0044204094,0.0016353114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99577004,0.00068003556,0.00016351062,0.0005692415,0.0022541215,0.0005630595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00382272,0.0003807407,0.00049998425,0.0012055706,0.013827566,0.011386927,0.0012987829,0.002995565,0.006644624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009006688,0.00028220942,0.00034555286,0.001509047,0.03794153,0.0041614515,0.002341402,0.008009538,0.0014616401],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000426927,0.0000031020202,0.00022118393,0.000014871603,0.0000031087693,0.000021378948,0.0021457793,0.000090586036,0.00008918333,0.977567,0.011362876,0.008476619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012694362,0.000014634732,0.0013274899,0.00012327399,0.00001472444,0.000051195857,0.0021343464,0.00031526497,0.0002193637,0.19916992,0.7965867,0.000030485635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9155435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90840274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9155435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04083495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09786921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29627967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2974190242","doi":"10.1057/s41599-019-0318-6","title":"A collaboratively derived international research agenda on legislative science advice","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Palgrave Communications","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Advice (programming); Legislature; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.18309972588886794,"score_gpt":0.4623440012752929,"score_spread":0.27924427538642493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2974190242","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056199045,0.022399107,0.010645377,0.8072126,0.0064235306,0.00023983608,0.00017063168,0.00012340654,0.14716567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53280616,0.034802508,0.042101026,0.33824164,0.010248909,0.0020281752,0.0007355027,0.00046608676,0.038570028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.781269,0.14796592,0.013631875,0.013486962,0.030154657,0.013491574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.41457763,0.46103838,0.018845757,0.035556547,0.050295375,0.019686345],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.28782412,0.0010113294,0.0021868714,0.011058208,0.01598812,0.041385684,0.0060377475,0.03431989,0.022762295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31418917,0.0010117235,0.0020852587,0.0145872515,0.040101618,0.04292539,0.0257189,0.031123204,0.0030933702],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032393826,0.00012888698,0.0010661385,0.00081857026,0.000028591374,0.000104538245,0.015559718,0.00043442482,0.00017614545,0.89666176,0.050130002,0.03485875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049470727,0.000082852464,0.0016483819,0.0068399915,0.000060707498,0.00010578705,0.027754351,0.0007528656,0.0006068716,0.26244316,0.699572,0.00008357677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008142878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009311701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71217585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022241324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.103235796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87823963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2974310255","doi":"","title":"Comparative Constitutional Law Documents","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Council on Foreign Relations","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.03613144161824953,"score_gpt":0.3168066535058665,"score_spread":0.28067521188761696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2974310255","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0074640047,0.003247619,0.00302316,0.017868312,0.0008924792,0.000079644866,0.0014251989,0.00008823083,0.9659114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4777174,0.0052648773,0.0069740443,0.013472495,0.0023594496,0.00054997846,0.0025749663,0.00036817614,0.4907186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942167,0.0020854117,0.00023526337,0.0009486242,0.001813174,0.00070090266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855757,0.010129339,0.0003764362,0.0018848098,0.0016776407,0.00035610807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008623082,0.00042703058,0.00073163374,0.0052554253,0.009337625,0.01102596,0.0022106732,0.0063231224,0.08128653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02972356,0.0005523423,0.00053466763,0.006508054,0.009786348,0.0068586087,0.0025025357,0.006802137,0.0058066845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069674047,0.000018892302,0.00006326884,0.000021245685,0.0000020871994,0.00001928755,0.0007011307,0.00006749502,0.000034028722,0.9692497,0.025199296,0.004616591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000234235,0.000018063445,0.0010609953,0.0003774686,0.000016199936,0.00006006094,0.0018769673,0.00031422448,0.00041976085,0.32645166,0.6693603,0.0000208787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030819237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042343084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08128653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011375536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007443513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27193052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2974701945","doi":"","title":"Introductory Essay: The Rule of Law as the Rule of Artificial Reason","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Principle of legality; Law; Philosophy of law; Public law; Rule of law; Legal profession; Legal realism; Private law; Empirical legal studies; Legal formalism; Comparative law; Political science; Legal history; Black letter law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010578732188041744,"score_gpt":0.2655878664654505,"score_spread":0.2550091342774088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2974701945","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063833185,0.08695286,0.015764399,0.37847498,0.04048745,0.00009184587,0.00023012007,0.00010267304,0.47151232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34637588,0.06667598,0.0124129355,0.088002264,0.088987984,0.0002823738,0.00036426057,0.00030502144,0.39659324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917334,0.00037544555,0.000032824842,0.00013831115,0.00020896673,0.00007105545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996949,0.0024150242,0.00012696224,0.00010168203,0.0002976515,0.00010971427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001374173,0.0004211393,0.00034320934,0.0008475439,0.0021141716,0.0038496028,0.0007362131,0.0032453602,0.008880475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053825406,0.00023405145,0.00043020735,0.0007068197,0.007220082,0.003969586,0.0010862645,0.0049378304,0.0021350982],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012866827,0.000030340156,0.0001636948,0.00010842434,0.0000037716409,0.000069528905,0.0016303649,0.0002568979,0.00014468642,0.80628496,0.1816959,0.009598635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000866167,0.000020441075,0.00052746537,0.00036930142,0.00000411696,0.0001144373,0.0009129121,0.00026166445,0.00008472711,0.22313428,0.7745536,0.000008373526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002400583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027042378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008880475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027827688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020255472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029708147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2976100056","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1374","title":"A Chief and Court in Transition: The Wagner Court and the Constitution","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Dissent; Majority opinion; Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Concurring opinion; Economic Justice; Political science; Roberts Court; Constitution; Precedent; Original jurisdiction; Court of record; Politics","score_opus":0.03622582227224764,"score_gpt":0.28642562578894604,"score_spread":0.2501998035166984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2976100056","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20852882,0.029392552,0.0008032162,0.36522856,0.002886312,0.0000514212,0.00023472142,0.000037097718,0.39283732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91912574,0.003156031,0.00022613474,0.030811151,0.0007627376,0.000030023693,0.0000565457,0.000024522067,0.04580715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99550277,0.001411118,0.00008998017,0.00042064427,0.0008208371,0.0017546839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99780923,0.0010995328,0.00018505527,0.00007473144,0.0002127906,0.00061867904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030666152,0.00016547549,0.00028193998,0.0015109989,0.014304325,0.013763373,0.0010076766,0.005650344,0.004047845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009525301,0.00024815695,0.00033893358,0.0015521352,0.01104932,0.0043760166,0.003524949,0.0076959166,0.00051777955],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004436428,0.00004207651,0.0037564216,0.000026995845,0.000009899973,0.00071570626,0.009549779,0.00008851968,0.00020643028,0.9203205,0.05450359,0.010735662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006803201,0.000068908295,0.0193241,0.00040383413,0.000042712592,0.00046119437,0.042650886,0.00027122925,0.0004694764,0.1423827,0.7937776,0.00007929633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.114082694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3947885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.114082694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013412207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018150168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22683734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978234545","doi":"10.1017/cco9781139342551.005","title":"Legislative supremacy in a multidimensional constitution","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Legislature; Political science; State (computer science); Law; Constitutional law; Function (biology); Common law; Core (optical fiber); Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.06616505942170775,"score_gpt":0.26698039211769187,"score_spread":0.20081533269598412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978234545","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029918194,0.003986547,0.027313247,0.008897811,0.00039637176,0.00006711578,0.00013816083,0.00010584625,0.92917687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89490676,0.0023653142,0.020138552,0.0017580513,0.0005028562,0.00042742246,0.00018204353,0.00007390859,0.07964503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99647707,0.0017589692,0.0002510062,0.0006035612,0.0006527876,0.00025661112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99782676,0.0009963484,0.00020529951,0.00062193855,0.00023945997,0.00011023507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047787023,0.00028976775,0.00036361694,0.0011911262,0.003463748,0.0062172194,0.0006590676,0.0016345303,0.0075692423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048892717,0.00038162046,0.0004478176,0.0012499373,0.017672546,0.0061839633,0.0037544416,0.0036911953,0.0009420925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001133955,0.0000016028184,0.000012350879,0.0000040328378,4.706538e-7,0.000004036435,0.00027082293,0.000051977775,0.000025642063,0.9985775,0.00025248842,0.0007979774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019464755,0.000015124322,0.00038102927,0.00008278215,0.000006989545,0.00003460612,0.0003957642,0.00047583733,0.00017552864,0.90136933,0.09703551,0.000007965505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012012876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018651648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075692423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031066905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002487069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025321662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978729991","doi":"","title":"Erga Omnes or Inter Partes? The Legal Effects of Federal Courts’ Constitutional Judgments","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Constitution; Deference; Federal jurisdiction; Jurisprudence; Res judicata; Exclusive jurisdiction; Statutory law; Supreme court","score_opus":0.02794251358819732,"score_gpt":0.2919764639386901,"score_spread":0.26403395035049276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978729991","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056415543,0.0041297595,0.011703869,0.06817209,0.0006278994,0.00005197118,0.0003243611,0.00007861444,0.85849595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9692227,0.0015004721,0.0025551543,0.008095825,0.0007300004,0.000044299908,0.000062530344,0.000038308877,0.017750662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98814666,0.0038311803,0.00039722963,0.0017070897,0.0039812583,0.0019365714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871459,0.008131888,0.0008434459,0.0017153873,0.0017988965,0.00036455336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012519918,0.00031256277,0.00049192744,0.002089654,0.003678065,0.008452066,0.0016688466,0.0035582697,0.010338764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024809098,0.0004399872,0.0007680243,0.0012348637,0.033518933,0.00950243,0.0027356213,0.0058357683,0.0006438105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009724785,0.000011012564,0.00035038887,0.000017289774,0.000008279293,0.00002792759,0.0007859963,0.00016411154,0.00014630222,0.9908693,0.0019852198,0.005624539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046485504,0.000030305777,0.006643334,0.00019431328,0.00007091512,0.000041243224,0.0017108509,0.0007125364,0.0009961633,0.8933721,0.096133575,0.000048139456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.074953094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09337478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9250469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012216082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009275004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1490336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979350335","doi":"10.4324/9780429032400-6","title":"Constitutionalists’ guide to the populist challenge","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Political science; Law; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.05124004654010909,"score_gpt":0.31629934416876837,"score_spread":0.26505929762865926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979350335","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00082300574,0.065907344,0.020845989,0.13573387,0.005838351,0.00009929725,0.00047357797,0.00035107692,0.76992744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.079831794,0.053997394,0.03064354,0.06482274,0.011755313,0.0008715627,0.00071250426,0.00090582384,0.7564593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813664,0.0009594852,0.000084677624,0.0001605825,0.0005251607,0.00013332642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99770015,0.0017529236,0.00006119938,0.00016708583,0.00020698449,0.000111657835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033252097,0.0008368185,0.0006177727,0.0024470296,0.0038702183,0.0048279366,0.0015974727,0.0043915445,0.021993574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006169538,0.00061290327,0.00050611416,0.002494807,0.01071578,0.0064968537,0.0025298318,0.009972642,0.007128921],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023527814,0.000009858665,0.000023323724,0.000029442475,0.0000016609231,0.000039574243,0.0009485378,0.00012361168,0.000032729356,0.8789281,0.10987276,0.00998798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033061713,0.0000025455354,0.00003456022,0.000082456994,6.6257377e-7,0.000031174743,0.0002720911,0.00007695393,0.000019972966,0.23778582,0.76168686,0.0000035230817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006508668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01156808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021993574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048601334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034310238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073575854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980370897","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebz013","title":"One Parent, Three Parents: Judges and Ontario’s All Families Are Equal Act, 2016","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Champion; Legislation; Discretion; Law; Variety (cybernetics); Diversity (politics); Family law; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.055754113234218874,"score_gpt":0.3267932573809631,"score_spread":0.27103914414674424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980370897","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4470147,0.0067212954,0.0006158341,0.22999258,0.0012313176,0.00018716152,0.0011764732,0.00004432027,0.3130162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8744006,0.0020227863,0.00037428862,0.011959425,0.0001628504,0.0000660066,0.00016765152,0.000022846105,0.11082364],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99467963,0.00070397154,0.000167557,0.00041726933,0.0022148879,0.0018166793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874014,0.0033596302,0.0007560271,0.00039509797,0.004720578,0.0033672452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057583274,0.00016373661,0.0002573929,0.00068906334,0.0311704,0.0053953147,0.0013930538,0.0034701333,0.00681156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016963063,0.0003570435,0.00021215828,0.0012608796,0.0072326367,0.0014469298,0.0025072598,0.0039585945,0.00040561942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021257755,0.00011381093,0.07002321,0.00021316008,0.000033531844,0.0029922982,0.18482944,0.00048634663,0.0014752893,0.31453708,0.3759693,0.04911399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047437676,0.000049175516,0.13834539,0.0003974272,0.000043857282,0.0002690951,0.07292746,0.00032722222,0.000539769,0.0066452557,0.7803018,0.00010621508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98471767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13485335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13485335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17865233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9784341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980752423","doi":"10.24908/fede.v8i1.13641","title":"Putting the Safe Back Into the Safeguards of Federalism: A Comparative Analysis of the Complexities of Political Safeguards","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federalism-E","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Politics; Safeguarding; Cooperative federalism; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Law; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.06402983847341878,"score_gpt":0.3599904355581284,"score_spread":0.29596059708470956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980752423","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2496261,0.015752293,0.024055917,0.04747092,0.00030465078,0.0000862884,0.000090798814,0.00003487767,0.66257817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99472433,0.0013951898,0.00095954485,0.00082518585,0.00008526278,0.000030963703,0.000012538081,0.000018299275,0.0019486714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9734698,0.019075107,0.0005046136,0.0011502146,0.003662774,0.0021375634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94997436,0.04133297,0.002744302,0.002868749,0.0024817956,0.00059784245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021712465,0.00022162485,0.0007814647,0.004684734,0.007994368,0.013019908,0.0013110659,0.0035386025,0.0052851555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04584324,0.0003814977,0.0008278697,0.0039110268,0.04787207,0.015633373,0.005196692,0.0057792985,0.00026033085],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012655049,0.000004004148,0.00013120017,0.000019646504,0.0000046294504,0.000020268317,0.003254358,0.000103233186,0.000044921104,0.99433714,0.00030495206,0.0017629835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003983551,0.0000684092,0.0037430048,0.00042419828,0.000052434098,0.00008917163,0.017140975,0.00072247244,0.00059304695,0.9111591,0.06593309,0.00003426858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00605192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0078085773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021712465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011559403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068405764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11482787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981848832","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190640484.003.0005","title":"The Three Varieties of Unamendability","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art","score_opus":0.038394757950436245,"score_gpt":0.27481300618394555,"score_spread":0.23641824823350932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981848832","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24272811,0.0035780778,0.12927872,0.009032142,0.00031750824,0.00038493244,0.0003879236,0.00037507515,0.6139175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814384,0.00036176216,0.011426559,0.00036582618,0.00011192898,0.00027854246,0.00009790619,0.00005957142,0.00585941],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95699984,0.023223324,0.0031526496,0.0041419966,0.010400466,0.0020815912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90070045,0.057397213,0.009737081,0.023525417,0.0073780892,0.0012617398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01564746,0.00087949727,0.0009917544,0.0063316333,0.0037696462,0.01451762,0.0030360045,0.003621016,0.008353479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.095209144,0.0009926737,0.0011146903,0.0049633686,0.03914308,0.018793317,0.008757972,0.0053687147,0.00081832806],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013280153,0.000011094036,0.0012108549,0.00003146779,0.000008399396,0.0000752179,0.0024115588,0.00032942646,0.0000943065,0.9899039,0.00035861976,0.0055519566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012821869,0.000024439725,0.0020364488,0.00025036448,0.0000137891275,0.00019016143,0.0030786784,0.001889606,0.0005466424,0.9768148,0.0151127335,0.000029498668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012291634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010087515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01564746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006381629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023280426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082752645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982313139","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0051","title":"‘Repugnant’: Homosexuality and Criminal Family Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Decriminalization; Homosexuality; Criminal law; State (computer science); Law; State of exception; Political science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.04238659385392869,"score_gpt":0.2583657877288654,"score_spread":0.21597919387493675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982313139","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28854287,0.03515805,0.0019370625,0.21782145,0.0006237176,0.00002521856,0.00008404198,0.000027741291,0.45577994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97922224,0.0029494155,0.00013697782,0.006226594,0.00009264822,0.0000045846896,0.000009364368,0.0000058101227,0.011352304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998252,0.00074542867,0.000030462646,0.00012172027,0.00033438538,0.00051600515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883705,0.0005459232,0.00012219159,0.000075070995,0.00017283652,0.00024690587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019889541,0.0001272574,0.00017767583,0.00067247427,0.011154264,0.0058497083,0.00078982575,0.0022835406,0.0027124495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030323956,0.00014882613,0.00012883735,0.00086405023,0.045609,0.0024321736,0.0020586015,0.0032486212,0.00014638103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006062881,0.000010092104,0.0016572996,0.000015979123,0.0000018729198,0.00014870855,0.044182923,0.00006349608,0.000073075666,0.9426531,0.005138062,0.0060493355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026413798,0.000047587797,0.037240524,0.00056605524,0.000023750292,0.00057083333,0.16333707,0.00054975256,0.00067949016,0.23501247,0.56187606,0.00007006504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7919984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8311656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20800161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030717233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026081657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4184531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2983026857","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199485079.001.0001","title":"Appointment of Judges to the Supreme Court of India","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Judicial independence; Political science; Constitution; Context (archaeology); Doctrine; Judicial review; Constitutional law; Constitution of India; Separation of powers; Independence (probability theory); Judicial activism; Judicial opinion; History","score_opus":0.029711430306558286,"score_gpt":0.24121194795324946,"score_spread":0.21150051764669117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2983026857","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06817355,0.0072957124,0.0017250251,0.016570799,0.0033311557,0.00007287785,0.0003220398,0.0001432682,0.90236557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80754346,0.0043885317,0.001390704,0.005857897,0.0008881829,0.000044897028,0.00021072789,0.00008349544,0.17959212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764484,0.00046032268,0.0001004461,0.00031288972,0.0005944184,0.00088700413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986958,0.00063989894,0.000095760275,0.00011216735,0.00026973578,0.0001867112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012437126,0.00021010854,0.00015346256,0.0014661931,0.009264577,0.006958314,0.0012013876,0.0012730652,0.0031378458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044401726,0.00049782667,0.00034352476,0.0024042935,0.004243886,0.0012846824,0.0022348366,0.0056427806,0.0010320118],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045108398,0.000018657749,0.00259329,0.00009249641,0.000010025173,0.0009839799,0.028227443,0.00033257913,0.0008064431,0.83295435,0.10860764,0.025328036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001229431,0.000026294405,0.012273922,0.00019367036,0.000029727827,0.0002618806,0.014636703,0.00025116527,0.0011056485,0.017615052,0.9535242,0.000069359165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09426751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24990277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09426751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01057433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0102540925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18743765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990891170","doi":"","title":"There Ought to be a Law: Gustav Radbruch, Lon L. Fuller, and H.L.A. Hart on the Choice Between Natural Law and Legal Positivism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal positivism; Legal profession; Legal realism; Natural law; Jurisprudence; Positive law; Positivism; Political science; Comparative law; Legal history; Philosophy of law; Legal formalism; Black letter law; Sociology; Private law","score_opus":0.01236310018512925,"score_gpt":0.264966744970287,"score_spread":0.25260364478515773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990891170","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035321736,0.089238994,0.0017527431,0.8764487,0.0034960215,0.00001251404,0.00003583287,0.000026484544,0.025456566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38138404,0.14453119,0.0057105348,0.4183351,0.020773549,0.00019803601,0.0001376985,0.0003075405,0.028622314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993192,0.0036597818,0.00019237502,0.00087799964,0.0014740659,0.0006037238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9743551,0.020728119,0.0010766747,0.00065891317,0.0016873525,0.0014937615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012623814,0.0006600447,0.0014764555,0.0025756988,0.0071546477,0.016531317,0.0014549446,0.009605568,0.0035589407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022444641,0.00077446835,0.00070096354,0.002214956,0.0448488,0.01881538,0.005560931,0.01622308,0.0009139791],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017427645,0.00002967272,0.00024391625,0.00007211313,0.0000078897,0.000047687285,0.0032740785,0.00007554674,0.000026570031,0.9078589,0.08030104,0.008045135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003379181,0.000013423187,0.00047605237,0.0009482907,0.00001319936,0.00006156562,0.0031138659,0.00017760099,0.00006774408,0.8114218,0.18363647,0.00003617979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017115356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015564728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017115356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0086852675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011552317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06676191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990994885","doi":"10.1007/s11366-019-09642-x","title":"Kwai Hang Ng and Xin He, Embedded Courts: Judicial Decision-Making in China","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Chinese Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Hang; China; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.009676730435413424,"score_gpt":0.3425033309141789,"score_spread":0.33282660047876544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990994885","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9094662,0.0046516433,0.0045825383,0.032154657,0.00014193369,0.00011264882,0.00021585681,0.000026670863,0.04864783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909689,0.0011335402,0.00037578994,0.0006396811,0.000029488368,0.00002195567,0.00003184399,0.0000039960537,0.006794739],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998926,0.00025634715,0.00007014473,0.0001401852,0.00022310154,0.00038413145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982822,0.0009253782,0.000222381,0.00006135802,0.00027868207,0.00022994704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017801743,0.00022259222,0.00029611573,0.0012031822,0.0029031176,0.0038975114,0.000758751,0.0016525058,0.004496932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003477158,0.00025591638,0.00031311842,0.0020608893,0.0032015124,0.0030718527,0.0011354694,0.0014344321,0.00019557547],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030999692,0.00024474587,0.092840396,0.00052900764,0.00026532187,0.002044013,0.042735934,0.008887743,0.0026472642,0.7740068,0.019884089,0.055604585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023631826,0.00019647846,0.33573782,0.00040242856,0.0006175083,0.00019029531,0.057602767,0.034293916,0.005034641,0.49707925,0.06823588,0.00037278593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.082961604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17155719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.082961604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057772305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0079670735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16495746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991032491","doi":"10.3917/cdlj.1201.0113","title":"Le défi de la théocratie constitutionnelle","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de la Justice","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011690541414848474,"score_gpt":0.2778561657345244,"score_spread":0.2661656243196759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991032491","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05870127,0.01620653,0.014347129,0.17028572,0.0011901603,0.000053972246,0.0001823152,0.00006569308,0.73896736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9467037,0.0041135163,0.003358097,0.008812642,0.0006397392,0.000078082965,0.00005420288,0.00004225747,0.036197685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99275345,0.0037158355,0.00019905657,0.0010085008,0.0014479059,0.0008751305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927636,0.0044585997,0.00082272256,0.0007007174,0.000852568,0.00040179913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062623015,0.00028990756,0.00041707137,0.0015779629,0.005958184,0.00947861,0.0008126244,0.002904464,0.0045998157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008860326,0.00024050043,0.00026968116,0.001314237,0.034677673,0.006015302,0.0036584437,0.0061356,0.0005656958],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023644511,0.0000018160921,0.00009956083,0.000009659723,0.0000011624386,0.000008798231,0.0011036514,0.000027407155,0.00003010779,0.9964748,0.0009971344,0.0012436301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003145323,0.00002719346,0.00171798,0.00022533651,0.000010714197,0.00011694631,0.0029713588,0.0002773934,0.00044518535,0.7211055,0.27304053,0.00003051143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020713467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02994872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020713467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009225805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009782537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06693816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991114952","doi":"10.21991/cf29390","title":"The Notwithstanding Clause and the New Populism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Legislature; Political science; Law; Context (archaeology); Convention; Politics; Populism; Commerce Clause; Power (physics); Establishment Clause; Dormant Commerce Clause; Law and economics; Sociology; Federalism; First amendment; Supreme court; History","score_opus":0.015098768931774672,"score_gpt":0.2648937825354698,"score_spread":0.24979501360369513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991114952","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0674858,0.0047873924,0.013331042,0.083669566,0.0012414306,0.000067575595,0.000116447016,0.000060501745,0.8292402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93006974,0.000985747,0.0026227,0.019376311,0.0012293233,0.000119399374,0.00006350585,0.00006245251,0.045470767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940601,0.001602006,0.00016000141,0.0008751929,0.001973749,0.0013289812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99553275,0.00246903,0.0003350371,0.0006583543,0.00072213734,0.0002826272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008107669,0.00034018295,0.0006686619,0.0014168924,0.009444642,0.007901772,0.0016884224,0.0062370454,0.0052250335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010929269,0.00037988872,0.0005545798,0.001109558,0.038015626,0.006301581,0.0044572726,0.009608245,0.0005947007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002505234,0.0000017712429,0.000052983916,0.000002310251,5.651501e-7,0.000015083172,0.00035218135,0.000018291012,0.00002258251,0.9982552,0.00070383894,0.000572606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029507817,0.000015451107,0.0007219453,0.00008106377,0.000009100665,0.000063992076,0.0008717983,0.00035867403,0.0002563076,0.8818318,0.115736745,0.000023552688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04217599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056121342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.957824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008621884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0094798235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08386099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992063119","doi":"","title":"Article I Judges in an Article III World: The Career Path of Magistrate Judges","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Magistrate; Law; Political science; Adjudication; Deference","score_opus":0.028307043287376522,"score_gpt":0.28094575714051123,"score_spread":0.2526387138531347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992063119","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95107627,0.003165337,0.0020985093,0.0055928854,0.0001507407,0.000046087625,0.0036833396,0.00003973604,0.03414697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98754686,0.00091288594,0.0011812084,0.0009873993,0.00010295395,0.000051786024,0.0024304665,0.000028676386,0.00675777],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968136,0.0010598437,0.0002306807,0.0006550264,0.00058742124,0.00065346784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920546,0.0018307444,0.0026823315,0.0006170657,0.0013399135,0.001475473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002147047,0.00013800318,0.000255404,0.0026777035,0.0034253628,0.0032845454,0.0005697555,0.00055283343,0.004419786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013821131,0.00020518289,0.00013470884,0.0040123374,0.001258556,0.0016482413,0.002051292,0.0012157023,0.0015646622],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021747623,0.00008168654,0.80698085,0.00012314471,0.000033733995,0.0004899576,0.046531808,0.0001607072,0.001113808,0.026061438,0.039638244,0.07856715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016682792,0.000073393436,0.7911936,0.0002818718,0.00002297836,0.0006564769,0.050347753,0.00047509538,0.0006980437,0.00791301,0.14828488,0.000036228244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059980623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001990151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03956437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992387905","doi":"","title":"Proportionality in Sentence Appeals: Towards a Guiding Principle of Appellate Review","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Sentence; Law; Political science; Sentencing guidelines; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04974857846533353,"score_gpt":0.3596111677466684,"score_spread":0.30986258928133487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992387905","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038443517,0.0056735626,0.648945,0.10001487,0.0010389689,0.0022055204,0.00012672457,0.00033518215,0.2032167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81163096,0.0013532231,0.16043866,0.01179401,0.0011316927,0.0014129985,0.000049095823,0.000121734636,0.012067682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.82686424,0.11478482,0.008747662,0.013516678,0.030195056,0.005891527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8493569,0.10870055,0.0082316,0.008892596,0.02175552,0.0030627858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15700895,0.0004792945,0.0014015904,0.0037635826,0.008093584,0.013366657,0.0040516374,0.00837478,0.0019259746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20721202,0.0013525737,0.0013313537,0.0022274049,0.030082094,0.0096128015,0.008258657,0.01076952,0.00051250577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013002113,0.00002047807,0.00054428633,0.0000726555,0.00002061549,0.00008678493,0.0028340518,0.00096328126,0.00019398355,0.9753289,0.0023239688,0.017598076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067740584,0.000060586444,0.0013684581,0.00021443082,0.00004264594,0.00017499563,0.0006117389,0.0038058301,0.00078774674,0.94208646,0.050713405,0.00006612796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022012023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024716267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15700895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01294236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043302305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8303526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992569009","doi":"","title":"All Together Now: Government Bill Bundling in the 42nd Parliament","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Legislature; Legislation; House of Commons; Government (linguistics); Consistency (knowledge bases); Law; Political science; Public administration; Law and economics; Legislative intent; Session (web analytics); Commons; Bill of rights; Politics; Economics; Business; Advertising; Computer science; Constitution","score_opus":0.04892776545096016,"score_gpt":0.3084681052847461,"score_spread":0.25954033983378594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992569009","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07713826,0.09612738,0.009291809,0.14115067,0.006496361,0.0006102222,0.00063900324,0.00025745138,0.6682888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6661919,0.03962282,0.018280264,0.10300427,0.0014457839,0.0004213251,0.0009418447,0.00028392265,0.16980803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9762748,0.006420855,0.0011106405,0.0016003705,0.011475221,0.0031182282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98595387,0.0051656705,0.0010387838,0.0010721206,0.005962091,0.00080748135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017770233,0.0002705248,0.00057517743,0.0033652848,0.00833944,0.0071596424,0.00159127,0.003419516,0.0032755707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039595064,0.00067923643,0.00070830324,0.0055145933,0.0053510116,0.0040185256,0.0019172581,0.006355432,0.000813057],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068313246,0.000042083877,0.0026158364,0.0005588301,0.000036218353,0.00044273143,0.009068208,0.000689138,0.00088842516,0.7654422,0.11856165,0.10158646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018032426,0.00005153408,0.011756489,0.00085477723,0.00005194183,0.00017671434,0.0026289874,0.00027153536,0.00070288323,0.014869434,0.9685541,0.000063550826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5836448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7140082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4163552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03714974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05932477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83761436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992685277","doi":"10.3138/utlj.69.s1.004","title":"Remedial discretion and dilemmas in Asia","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Remedial education; Legislation; Reinterpretation; Political science; Law; Judicial discretion; Judicial review; Discretion; Constitutionality; Government (linguistics); Judicial restraint; Judicial activism; Law and economics; Supreme court; Sociology","score_opus":0.00941150560976816,"score_gpt":0.22191570462976817,"score_spread":0.21250419902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992685277","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27096304,0.004294139,0.008457382,0.044567242,0.00023662245,0.000079867736,0.000084299805,0.00006175503,0.67125565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833941,0.0006053261,0.0010077283,0.0034415696,0.0000693852,0.000032772306,0.000011248831,0.000020884258,0.011417016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99353504,0.0022823936,0.00052673,0.00089196867,0.0012029267,0.0015609441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923199,0.00335495,0.0011059679,0.001261009,0.0011554129,0.0008028677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01259757,0.0002744335,0.0006084174,0.0012540808,0.007547784,0.008024794,0.0016461124,0.003807707,0.0077007534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013864607,0.0003514917,0.0005083982,0.0013603482,0.023280026,0.006545302,0.007057236,0.006589566,0.0005357088],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028938199,0.000032469477,0.0018324073,0.00004354421,0.000014122167,0.00076205435,0.010706936,0.0006839319,0.0002810818,0.9744855,0.0018077203,0.009321236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000099266304,0.00008502981,0.005365326,0.0005319944,0.000046728037,0.0009507266,0.023429753,0.002566957,0.0011894995,0.81631356,0.14932533,0.00009575935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023637109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02574753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023637109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00899787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010373604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06662315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992928199","doi":"","title":"Ensuring constitutional wisdom during unconventional times","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Governor; Law; Administration (probate law); Political science; Public administration; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.025808902695350168,"score_gpt":0.2844943193449863,"score_spread":0.2586854166496361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992928199","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29980814,0.01873582,0.010603476,0.2628577,0.0019007967,0.00023190964,0.00023355996,0.000080188984,0.4055484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806136,0.0011451222,0.001080744,0.008554009,0.0002063173,0.00006300741,0.000021550051,0.000032151896,0.008283373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9470424,0.0223811,0.0020379508,0.0030864736,0.013722038,0.0117299855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91519123,0.047345534,0.006818541,0.009279416,0.01682835,0.0045370334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.052448273,0.0002559303,0.0007297929,0.002079106,0.024406508,0.014636038,0.0017680622,0.0069382605,0.0028658095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12110961,0.0005248962,0.0003098953,0.003008502,0.045318097,0.010587273,0.008399475,0.011327149,0.00036103398],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026083648,0.000007630345,0.0011645583,0.00006286096,0.000010023119,0.00041862793,0.083872,0.00021707735,0.00031143817,0.8838675,0.01712266,0.0129196355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030140098,0.000027295971,0.008786172,0.00070299325,0.00001701336,0.000355834,0.10638809,0.00033844906,0.00095257093,0.4340333,0.4482741,0.00009406972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19009295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29766572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9624395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03756053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06472173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37797296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993070474","doi":"10.3138/utlj.69.s1.001","title":"Interim remedies and constitutional rights","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interim; Law; Political science; Charter; Plaintiff; Common law; Limiting; Constitution; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.014208744565499847,"score_gpt":0.23841466989568655,"score_spread":0.2242059253301867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993070474","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022152668,0.0041104094,0.044133287,0.02888918,0.00083826674,0.00025329343,0.00022392004,0.00018016706,0.8992189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.855935,0.0026045318,0.01785314,0.010791834,0.0010566144,0.0003984441,0.00017788332,0.00012955721,0.111053035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97807944,0.0059334794,0.001413507,0.0038222186,0.00633306,0.0044183093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98591805,0.0057466826,0.0012220134,0.0038716248,0.002295584,0.00094605744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018022312,0.00063857983,0.0009714317,0.0019773196,0.007466613,0.011251513,0.002874945,0.011462203,0.016858842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030874869,0.0006956364,0.0012020785,0.0011619566,0.046745744,0.011892817,0.007894146,0.012951025,0.001654591],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004597772,0.000005959341,0.000056516874,0.000010330703,0.000002161659,0.000030926545,0.00031410978,0.000089182984,0.00007752388,0.99635917,0.00069460814,0.0023549385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004437256,0.00007365523,0.0007119102,0.00027098868,0.000030981646,0.00015830467,0.00069558364,0.0003556102,0.0005947214,0.8544753,0.14253618,0.00005241955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016588401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020535734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018022312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009021115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017187411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09531224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993318716","doi":"","title":"The Charter at 30: A Reflection","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitutionalism; Transformative learning; Constitution; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Politics; State (computer science); Constitutional law; Reflection (computer programming); Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.05762100584181712,"score_gpt":0.3022370486789722,"score_spread":0.2446160428371551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993318716","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062800962,0.0066610533,0.0020814699,0.6234328,0.010005463,0.00009706084,0.00037236154,0.00009235731,0.35097724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24350856,0.0053445967,0.0022721954,0.32844123,0.0026067859,0.00011316728,0.00021484797,0.00020318599,0.4172955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99368346,0.0010361732,0.0001094155,0.00084468274,0.0025751395,0.0017511331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970521,0.0006226015,0.0000849481,0.00016313262,0.0014890562,0.0005881319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052852733,0.00060713285,0.0003482608,0.0009887283,0.01350464,0.009569848,0.0021122652,0.008608423,0.010675763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010669837,0.00033240172,0.00056592666,0.0011551661,0.019344868,0.0061877477,0.002743178,0.01566884,0.0018485027],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014645794,0.000010352789,0.00013483598,0.000024927593,0.0000017511502,0.00013705654,0.0057982113,0.00009814437,0.00020470054,0.676901,0.31005624,0.006618192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054829306,0.0000053010226,0.00044491823,0.000059428035,0.0000023579903,0.0000292504,0.0030214388,0.00006950909,0.00012721983,0.01624889,0.97996545,0.00002070411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91060203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91636693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91060203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04845562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07650797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35157174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993485449","doi":"","title":"Parliamentary Rules Concerning Private Members’ Bills","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Legislation; Government (linguistics); Task (project management); Law; Business; Political science; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.05150391308401827,"score_gpt":0.3084666213593609,"score_spread":0.2569627082753427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993485449","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02656789,0.013692385,0.010995821,0.078956746,0.0047353227,0.0009097812,0.0026841478,0.00034753844,0.8611103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64814824,0.009910044,0.017550733,0.04174928,0.0025430378,0.0008324097,0.0019472856,0.00036222028,0.27695674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9215422,0.012898339,0.0061865337,0.0051707877,0.043145847,0.011056238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.905766,0.031051017,0.004800427,0.009391182,0.04607823,0.0029131656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042415828,0.00043690647,0.0013375704,0.004838999,0.015729202,0.014824022,0.0043956595,0.007840595,0.006412617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12629181,0.0014870947,0.0008215776,0.0057115885,0.010955686,0.0035792585,0.0026261616,0.011107422,0.0022016796],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002617412,0.00002024488,0.00090965704,0.00015637146,0.000020233452,0.00011968191,0.004744596,0.00030746136,0.0005336138,0.8718787,0.10059042,0.020692851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003518162,0.000025274432,0.0073728864,0.0005922117,0.000057268036,0.000100595986,0.0015704235,0.00040205254,0.00089027034,0.04380235,0.9450463,0.000105093226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6820307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7371224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31796932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0536291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10879008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6396838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993557111","doi":"10.3138/utlj.69.s1.005","title":"Choosing between simple and complex remedies in socio-economic rights cases","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Simple (philosophy); Ideal (ethics); Law and economics; Work (physics); Dialogical self; Political science; Law; Economic Justice; Human rights; Sociology; Epistemology; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029304648008640122,"score_gpt":0.2639876908291506,"score_spread":0.23468304282051045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993557111","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46079126,0.008151561,0.11551578,0.08178968,0.0006251377,0.0020002956,0.00010975108,0.00027059508,0.33074597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98020935,0.0005762559,0.014465279,0.0028041606,0.00008532927,0.00022000591,0.0000096919175,0.000023287337,0.0016066708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93516177,0.030062005,0.005339052,0.004800372,0.017296882,0.0073399083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8818769,0.09666296,0.009943544,0.0039394824,0.004469172,0.0031079429],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05927853,0.0007101189,0.0013499645,0.0072431387,0.014151921,0.01991407,0.003472497,0.012445082,0.0034885695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11461885,0.001056151,0.0014258642,0.0031269868,0.04222229,0.02022516,0.014936003,0.009292687,0.0003926335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006098215,0.00011975544,0.003656585,0.00016090149,0.000050783336,0.0005654439,0.0047984137,0.002711821,0.00065297104,0.9685126,0.0013130236,0.017396785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002471681,0.00015712102,0.0074561904,0.0006026132,0.00009984676,0.00034156564,0.0061428538,0.00666626,0.001708229,0.96170175,0.014690849,0.00018543878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054029603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015570851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05927853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013266294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012591059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31349862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993987532","doi":"","title":"Parliamentarians and the New Code of Ethics","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Code (set theory); Political science; Programming language; Computer science","score_opus":0.05326371623557837,"score_gpt":0.32457692390065696,"score_spread":0.2713132076650786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993987532","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013720404,0.030778378,0.003898081,0.45659646,0.0033021937,0.00014063361,0.00034062122,0.00009121692,0.49113193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66954464,0.01964187,0.0070396992,0.0877565,0.0041661253,0.00031973695,0.00031486547,0.0002140002,0.21100254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9337834,0.021696951,0.002094764,0.0034022608,0.028726194,0.010296385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91072935,0.036764357,0.0031774996,0.0041278317,0.038134594,0.0070662666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03483791,0.00062680984,0.0013623488,0.00900125,0.028351855,0.02635845,0.003314659,0.012885291,0.009716241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.094342455,0.0010267235,0.00062551064,0.008793431,0.049505487,0.0069634556,0.0044384506,0.011695578,0.0009979255],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011264111,0.000007284318,0.00027663348,0.00005569106,0.000008499419,0.000035553734,0.002540377,0.0001510595,0.000038012935,0.9387357,0.050206997,0.0079329945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040089228,0.000011085793,0.005420181,0.0005087736,0.000025524265,0.000046463087,0.0029823454,0.00040531723,0.00010866632,0.31474984,0.6756171,0.000084661544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9482549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97108823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17365825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17365825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3680846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9584393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998326803","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12340046","title":"A Curious Decision by Zambia’s Highest Court: Six Years Imprisonment for Civil Contempt?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contempt; Law; Supreme court; Imprisonment; Political science; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.023376209581378288,"score_gpt":0.3157166741412048,"score_spread":0.29234046455982654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998326803","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66112626,0.0034848405,0.00042162527,0.28406176,0.0018316455,0.0000664724,0.00007034645,0.000020270656,0.048916712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96686256,0.0006627243,0.000131345,0.017964648,0.00016074044,0.000016318776,0.000011158523,0.000009069817,0.014181508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755657,0.00059299736,0.00007559242,0.00011176705,0.00018497206,0.0014780445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998329,0.0005441477,0.00020941312,0.00008307379,0.00025849574,0.00057584076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027775445,0.00017249983,0.00026851022,0.00049021444,0.018624652,0.0043339683,0.000894118,0.0053078,0.0054041725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007604192,0.000355213,0.00035553926,0.0003533197,0.0035712048,0.002040777,0.0030426409,0.011150484,0.00040339772],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005386608,0.00038362964,0.051176827,0.00024132515,0.00008538875,0.031515323,0.33119118,0.00048767994,0.008846407,0.3701428,0.15201135,0.05337949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007914661,0.000451396,0.1133082,0.0012698468,0.0000967561,0.003458243,0.3350323,0.0006339931,0.0040662233,0.020762604,0.5206293,0.00021200484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11295223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30612075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11295223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006528871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063283457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22458953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3000357133","doi":"10.1086/704740","title":"Advisors to Elites","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Courts","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Legal advice; Politics; Public relations; Political science; Set (abstract data type); Economic Justice; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.03423613159496956,"score_gpt":0.30169989213797777,"score_spread":0.2674637605430082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3000357133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.821481,0.0017437141,0.002164933,0.032735184,0.00023953387,0.00007437728,0.00023275787,0.00010155201,0.14122696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99432325,0.00024387405,0.00022259538,0.0011747758,0.0001504944,0.000009110383,0.00002135973,0.000008331028,0.0038461473],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99070626,0.0049345098,0.0003190033,0.00073313795,0.0012516099,0.0020554871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8577814,0.08698788,0.028101541,0.0048173782,0.007849906,0.014461863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006884495,0.00022991933,0.0004756611,0.0024085704,0.0033056461,0.0035026132,0.00060042023,0.0020702563,0.021314053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10572564,0.00017571173,0.0001664738,0.0018142728,0.003040391,0.0019669207,0.0020569214,0.0026350468,0.0014071998],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012371303,0.0010667664,0.5341,0.0006167156,0.0002392225,0.001614488,0.022910072,0.0030616685,0.0013676451,0.10562168,0.058203578,0.26996106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049878506,0.00079617684,0.63675,0.0011130428,0.00033475782,0.0006860104,0.04598399,0.008749852,0.0022534465,0.15085079,0.15184537,0.00013776626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015937658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023795137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021314053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032870956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002819458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07130259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003053514","doi":"10.1093/icon/moz061","title":"Enforcing constitutional conventions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Law; Normative; Power (physics); Political science; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.021840513729224884,"score_gpt":0.31999423877296934,"score_spread":0.29815372504374443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003053514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12825237,0.0016126717,0.17112698,0.030600883,0.00076716486,0.0005600257,0.00011824246,0.00049334316,0.6664683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96597034,0.00036905007,0.017476253,0.0029561943,0.0002267612,0.00019627673,0.000039706825,0.00008458132,0.012680781],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95214933,0.020579882,0.0030512663,0.0066419938,0.013631573,0.0039459653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9220653,0.0312931,0.007323658,0.023140207,0.01360996,0.0025678445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048682425,0.0004808405,0.0007645546,0.0023447738,0.007586254,0.011295213,0.0031750982,0.004765732,0.003161753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06873077,0.0007041553,0.0006376198,0.0015437631,0.047535803,0.007152426,0.010270376,0.008789692,0.0006869478],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022497024,0.00001145524,0.00051848206,0.00001731444,0.000007090128,0.000039447248,0.0032391439,0.00028659715,0.0004893082,0.9901087,0.0008187488,0.0044613834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003610481,0.00005243799,0.0014628092,0.00023632824,0.000047759175,0.000102659294,0.0020492247,0.0018925464,0.0031155937,0.88309604,0.10784493,0.00006359402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013816582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014334854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048682425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007784447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020612184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25746036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003533152","doi":"","title":"Seven Conceptions of Federalism Guiding Canada’s Constitutional Change Process — How Do They Work, and Why So Many?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Work (physics); Process (computing); Political science; Work in process; Law; Computer science; Engineering; Operations management; Politics; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.07644061034517834,"score_gpt":0.29066818111192455,"score_spread":0.2142275707667462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003533152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13860092,0.006771356,0.06665376,0.3484735,0.0007171162,0.00065289286,0.0009744891,0.00034247802,0.43681347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96387935,0.0012998502,0.021380557,0.005261079,0.000097998374,0.00018655532,0.0001354869,0.00008856752,0.007670572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98131573,0.0066295555,0.00053125963,0.0012216403,0.005803117,0.004498726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96989226,0.0101702,0.0019352458,0.002050471,0.011140715,0.0048110564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022345128,0.00053711684,0.0010089187,0.0044336137,0.02161501,0.028474538,0.0046246164,0.005614137,0.004951297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04388336,0.0005108533,0.0009191008,0.0067282645,0.054818854,0.007884648,0.0034361815,0.009675218,0.00029700153],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009833659,0.000014711672,0.001434367,0.000023655728,0.000010925615,0.0000109397315,0.0039874017,0.00029108825,0.000027516176,0.98474425,0.0040877587,0.005357572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006885256,0.000019361802,0.011469404,0.00040398262,0.0000950063,0.000031429645,0.022243299,0.0051281042,0.00049113994,0.885791,0.074149,0.00010937848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87541276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9399738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.837644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16235603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25201693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97154826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005174135","doi":"10.1145/3375627.3375848","title":"Towards Just, Fair and Interpretable Methods for Judicial Subset Selection","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Representativeness heuristic; Supreme court; Selection (genetic algorithm); Computer science; Economic Justice; Order (exchange); Process (computing); Law; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Statistics; Economics","score_opus":0.15690525602395852,"score_gpt":0.42214671508154156,"score_spread":0.265241459057583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005174135","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017012375,0.000079841964,0.9968652,0.0004086312,0.000022893873,0.0001521942,0.000029835644,0.00015183468,0.00058828364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.057527572,0.00012633599,0.9398574,0.00033060863,0.00016006884,0.0005249917,0.00022557036,0.00015929631,0.0010882216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9460256,0.038598914,0.0019106858,0.005046689,0.0074968203,0.00092125754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87064064,0.09316136,0.0063199312,0.019651117,0.008891231,0.0013357027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05109811,0.0018356931,0.002815008,0.0034405047,0.0030791352,0.0058638705,0.005050901,0.003987607,0.0043272595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13479757,0.0016343015,0.0023821623,0.003456313,0.006856397,0.0091872895,0.0065484187,0.0060754516,0.0018128617],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045798585,0.00034010122,0.0035444957,0.0004356593,0.00019602827,0.00019113843,0.002007494,0.12584022,0.0030239567,0.5019509,0.008037837,0.35397416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016728745,0.00010569046,0.0003558756,0.00010722214,0.000041318817,0.00012584745,0.00022473514,0.37145793,0.0020952085,0.61855954,0.0067067235,0.00005260611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021384952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032593682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05109811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028975536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008605864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27023584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006318875","doi":"","title":"Immuring Dicey’s Ghost: The Senate Reform Reference and Constitutional Conventions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CentAUR (University of Reading)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitution; Law; Metaphor; Political science; Constitutional law; Constitutional court; Architecture; Sociology; Philosophy; History; Linguistics","score_opus":0.039093682669905566,"score_gpt":0.24071363434391796,"score_spread":0.2016199516740124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006318875","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08319654,0.012814812,0.008213946,0.13093214,0.0008441197,0.000040805473,0.00014292063,0.0000940007,0.76372063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9462062,0.0026902268,0.0017462329,0.011282691,0.00021224219,0.000020275915,0.000033931196,0.000046375837,0.037761766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99349046,0.0030494197,0.00014755715,0.00044913145,0.0018089248,0.0010544434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961534,0.0020303035,0.00021659852,0.00030947168,0.0009949128,0.00029533994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004597116,0.00022550618,0.00032617073,0.0013316725,0.013275262,0.0100791855,0.001190554,0.0035818168,0.0031772736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008866083,0.00021058829,0.00026348818,0.0019852435,0.029422995,0.005137271,0.003660234,0.0057732547,0.00022083029],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029738032,0.0000012428156,0.00013977259,0.000009915846,0.0000012818841,0.000056152505,0.0073134187,0.000060183753,0.00004929047,0.9852997,0.004074884,0.002991167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016717539,0.000026885458,0.0033524462,0.00039789252,0.000030027439,0.0001840992,0.026368892,0.00065306626,0.0011202985,0.26406842,0.7036824,0.00009884728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6301157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.77549446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6301157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03354168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037261352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74412525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3007465312","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-35085-7_2","title":"The Supreme Court of the United States and Judicial Activism in the Trump Era","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Ninth; Law; Political science; Administration (probate law); Politics; Economic Justice; Certiorari; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.035743086013432374,"score_gpt":0.2674931164329036,"score_spread":0.2317500304194712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3007465312","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025968056,0.025997384,0.0009773376,0.08406444,0.0011530719,0.000016331149,0.000039229293,0.000013955311,0.8617703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8949122,0.006690613,0.0005908983,0.021710282,0.0026204293,0.00008100438,0.000026923895,0.000040414354,0.07332727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962553,0.0020792661,0.00005223925,0.00029486156,0.00055493566,0.0007633081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939486,0.004984803,0.0002764564,0.00017134118,0.0003698902,0.00024894098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033173899,0.00035409338,0.00042903135,0.0016266428,0.010357883,0.009822151,0.0012632976,0.008086433,0.0061399974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008174051,0.00028962,0.00030813765,0.0024896374,0.020104805,0.0051661404,0.002217415,0.009040771,0.00040536214],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002907093,0.000010103551,0.00004952336,0.000006434076,0.0000011889534,0.0000186056,0.0010023654,0.000032341075,0.000022108903,0.98782665,0.008822283,0.0022054033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001531372,0.000017622824,0.0011098085,0.00027576135,0.000008678292,0.000038752747,0.0057234606,0.00031431994,0.0001620435,0.783034,0.20928533,0.000014880309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016247885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042579528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016247885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070923474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066112396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051458776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3007712709","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-35085-7_5","title":"‘Principled Judicial Activism’ in Defense of Our Common Humanity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Parliament; Political science; Law; Humanity; Interpretation (philosophy); State (computer science); Context (archaeology); Meaning (existential); Rule of law; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Politics; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.07842353535616152,"score_gpt":0.31667543846105733,"score_spread":0.2382519031048958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3007712709","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004263985,0.0050630816,0.011605772,0.059604105,0.0010536875,0.00006418763,0.000035002242,0.000031831354,0.9182784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69522035,0.0028488415,0.0070387125,0.034088604,0.0033081335,0.00051020976,0.00006859271,0.00017044229,0.25674608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899635,0.0058105877,0.00017752593,0.0011615298,0.0018279207,0.0010590449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99448556,0.0038216163,0.00023197682,0.00081178755,0.00042421903,0.00022483066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009176292,0.00063781824,0.0008060802,0.0012009374,0.0064695366,0.010438844,0.0031520233,0.012336512,0.008028838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0115162665,0.00056539476,0.0005675012,0.0013675023,0.05833146,0.007831686,0.003837298,0.016221391,0.0014514475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.590645e-7,0.0000026813261,0.0000032328537,0.000004015727,5.080425e-7,0.0000031475765,0.0003446692,0.000016745716,0.000011721585,0.9959246,0.0031373708,0.0005504328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007834666,0.0000043760206,0.00006230762,0.00004656609,0.0000018842131,0.000023146058,0.00039781496,0.000114096336,0.000100794765,0.92924017,0.069996074,0.0000048397083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004215844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008140386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012336512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049079736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006755885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048529506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3007999426","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2019.32","title":"<i>The Coxford Lecture</i> Seek the Good: Professional Trust, Justice, and the Rule of Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Economic Justice; Rule of law; Admiration; Function (biology); Legal education; Due process; Constitution; Sociology; Political science; Common law; Psychology; Municipal law; Social psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.02041028390006334,"score_gpt":0.278402052167158,"score_spread":0.2579917682670947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3007999426","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020462882,0.054241586,0.00067856617,0.8362869,0.014874093,0.000011469848,0.000053408337,0.000026009147,0.09178174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24123643,0.06394322,0.001667806,0.15911658,0.01579318,0.000040483705,0.00007538356,0.0001846548,0.51794225],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998481,0.0005590566,0.00004030097,0.00014103575,0.00042734641,0.00035133856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973603,0.001067313,0.00010798668,0.000068919224,0.00049005717,0.00090539013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002002442,0.00035487773,0.00026551544,0.0007411152,0.0103665525,0.009128142,0.0007431085,0.0043278737,0.012130502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004691231,0.00029546657,0.00026888683,0.00084522855,0.015587152,0.0055605066,0.0014400807,0.009468524,0.0021455593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001327994,0.0000158912,0.00029599524,0.000071779454,0.0000035248793,0.00008249639,0.0033672443,0.000037416965,0.0000994364,0.15567946,0.82925195,0.011081572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056777394,0.00000792978,0.000897401,0.00033265786,0.0000045950187,0.000093229544,0.0070367246,0.00010798944,0.00015260224,0.02809792,0.9632448,0.000018509276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40982428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6741348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40982428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026533905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023008028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8148777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008073078","doi":"10.1017/s0008423920000086","title":"Seeking the Court's Advice: The Politics of the Canadian Reference Power Kate Puddister, Vancouver: UBC Press, 2019, pp. 290.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Politics; Political science; Power (physics); Law; Public administration; Computer science; Physics","score_opus":0.03245609222274947,"score_gpt":0.27931230527815626,"score_spread":0.24685621305540678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008073078","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005177968,0.16631708,0.0007721664,0.44951615,0.0029357395,0.00003186549,0.0007279577,0.00007527029,0.3744457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3268814,0.13267659,0.0023593882,0.0513834,0.0015307888,0.00006207895,0.0006081409,0.00040898775,0.48408923],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940403,0.0007698665,0.00012091924,0.00043714204,0.0032379148,0.0013939778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995652,0.00095323764,0.00011617315,0.00012455229,0.0025177156,0.00063635083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035523016,0.0006984783,0.00062269473,0.0030639744,0.030989937,0.013700087,0.0026395759,0.006619421,0.025180843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014722096,0.00072474807,0.000335722,0.008009978,0.016226452,0.005884995,0.0026120488,0.0058539384,0.0038828384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019515173,0.00000792086,0.00057054136,0.0001093266,0.000007903566,0.00016807312,0.010496085,0.00009835964,0.00009026849,0.20102699,0.7417401,0.045664962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008960369,0.0000031967402,0.0040551475,0.0005032568,0.00001337043,0.00008460411,0.011009676,0.00010644715,0.00008651344,0.023156598,0.9609174,0.000054820484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9932053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9977671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13607532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13607532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1599777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98730016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009029119","doi":"10.1093/cjcl/cxaa002","title":"Dare to Diverge: Time for Administrative Law in Hong Kong to Stand on Its Own Two Feet","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"City University of Hong Kong","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Economic Justice; Tribunal; Certainty; Political science; Administrative law; English law; Legal certainty","score_opus":0.07601680687163821,"score_gpt":0.4085948325334373,"score_spread":0.3325780256617991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009029119","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91126966,0.0012070938,0.0006994096,0.04449957,0.0005810166,0.000048904785,0.0000611248,0.00002555705,0.04160776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98326045,0.00022020299,0.0002313419,0.0035490445,0.000039707225,0.000016653139,0.00001770386,0.000009187811,0.012655666],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99600816,0.0010803097,0.0002707084,0.00033242974,0.00048968033,0.0018187275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99126136,0.002031869,0.0012320554,0.0005588285,0.0019283611,0.002987533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062653404,0.00013229404,0.00020844955,0.00043902898,0.0095457295,0.010819842,0.0011324853,0.0018070578,0.004385063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006644816,0.00042284618,0.00028302937,0.0006545503,0.008182858,0.0029253366,0.004325261,0.00414986,0.0005699758],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031013496,0.00042917606,0.18264873,0.00025842682,0.00007578745,0.010944502,0.37984604,0.0013398232,0.004493987,0.2947494,0.070209734,0.054694306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051618023,0.00027889965,0.15595938,0.00039837137,0.00005363286,0.0004966683,0.4589519,0.0012121956,0.001823105,0.009151686,0.3713969,0.00022567499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35634387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44989055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35634387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022871759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034495767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7085394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010910867","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Reconciliation and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.018190510594717966,"score_gpt":0.2363692416486264,"score_spread":0.21817873105390845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010910867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036639474,0.008834258,0.006340588,0.094906904,0.0012588905,0.00016122751,0.0005014811,0.00015812251,0.8511991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87679285,0.003780871,0.006840125,0.009275865,0.00049496454,0.00012883508,0.00019252894,0.00014845183,0.102345355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97764754,0.0045250533,0.00055474555,0.0025416932,0.008990316,0.0057406235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98625934,0.0038348956,0.0005472264,0.0014553991,0.006788429,0.001114779],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014386433,0.0007828197,0.0013300083,0.0060179774,0.035268955,0.021103475,0.004318668,0.008155265,0.011852076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033475585,0.00081837917,0.00091436226,0.008257907,0.042460836,0.0057961233,0.0059178537,0.011935855,0.0005178193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009296407,0.0000051034835,0.000095678595,0.0000134518,0.0000036959518,0.000019283945,0.0013513204,0.0002844881,0.000027382408,0.9843704,0.00874173,0.0050783176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104827646,0.000018311624,0.0047120266,0.0003183305,0.00006470019,0.0000713635,0.0040472476,0.001798022,0.00037113306,0.45817897,0.5301334,0.00018157379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9854477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9887466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18954197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18954197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31034812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94001645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011230888","doi":"","title":"Strengthening the Parliamentary Scrutiny of Delegated Legislation: Lessons From Australia","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Parliament; Legislation; Legislature; Public administration; Political science; Law; Government (linguistics); Cabinet (room); House of Representatives; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.03239378356906666,"score_gpt":0.31223809367539535,"score_spread":0.2798443101063287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011230888","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38059416,0.02860567,0.004776272,0.30163646,0.0017740994,0.00028537237,0.000091669004,0.00006277216,0.28217348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95100296,0.008372748,0.002861147,0.01582736,0.00037653622,0.000061212035,0.00003380385,0.000034038,0.021430163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9799631,0.0095453635,0.000602385,0.0009724458,0.005369672,0.003547052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9597906,0.017277308,0.0016907735,0.0019743906,0.015299242,0.0039677653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023004726,0.0002238155,0.0006633834,0.0019266622,0.010099912,0.008140579,0.001693409,0.003377394,0.0022366683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05152255,0.00030978746,0.00051709916,0.0024455553,0.008640129,0.004431232,0.004818269,0.006518107,0.0002719015],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000292864,0.00043074077,0.021738578,0.001322804,0.00016076284,0.0017264162,0.15911242,0.002149389,0.0018678887,0.506502,0.061254,0.2434422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015923759,0.0004656888,0.16549535,0.0037152756,0.00025270402,0.0005296022,0.07068345,0.0046950886,0.0029807817,0.10768032,0.6430696,0.00027289966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.61879444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.73796684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61879444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03344407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06553942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76690114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011431422","doi":"","title":"CSPG conference – Parliament and the Courts","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Institution; Law; Action (physics); Politics","score_opus":0.026130848001393134,"score_gpt":0.27257575376200616,"score_spread":0.246444905760613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011431422","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03422968,0.08988121,0.0009109417,0.2994689,0.0075844335,0.00020184583,0.0027319472,0.00007507479,0.5649159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5404469,0.023426758,0.0014099419,0.0537128,0.0016946497,0.00017482792,0.001081698,0.00011302799,0.3779394],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924452,0.0012740014,0.00011662342,0.00042973977,0.0038068746,0.0019276817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940785,0.0015588837,0.00015331968,0.00024527745,0.0030792542,0.00088472554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048473068,0.00038434027,0.00043594695,0.003170747,0.016803496,0.010325161,0.0014759761,0.0046768542,0.01225239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011598881,0.0003620469,0.0004077056,0.0054865833,0.006403821,0.0020301242,0.0020038348,0.003749556,0.0011165576],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054102864,0.000031584055,0.0019001105,0.00017578647,0.000022342665,0.00021128039,0.0059354817,0.0003400102,0.0003328532,0.26509905,0.68499625,0.040901225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011369682,0.000008956533,0.008777348,0.00024425067,0.00001246796,0.000026882091,0.00354295,0.00009565011,0.0002176288,0.0065920767,0.9804465,0.000023975917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9617696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9843494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.099773206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.099773206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15503792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72390866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011541903","doi":"10.29173/alr2595","title":"The Supreme Court, Functional Bilingualism, and the Indigenous Candidate: Reconciling the Bench","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Supreme court; Viewpoints; Representation (politics); Diversity (politics); Neuroscience of multilingualism; Law; Political science; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.0399132814501872,"score_gpt":0.2881896733746585,"score_spread":0.24827639192447132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011541903","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11953062,0.031737283,0.0029317795,0.22693506,0.0015398982,0.00007328588,0.00013072473,0.000058076497,0.6170632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93809104,0.0036508818,0.0009054721,0.022264672,0.00059828995,0.000029090425,0.000028618804,0.000031069652,0.0344009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924644,0.0020421892,0.00014398246,0.0004404487,0.0022849513,0.0026240742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939243,0.0031492293,0.00023874035,0.00019559669,0.001397362,0.0010946317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072644553,0.00021093372,0.00048555486,0.0020144917,0.021613669,0.013998394,0.0024870916,0.0062871813,0.004510041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010317084,0.00027517232,0.00037895766,0.0019121798,0.024905518,0.0027583227,0.003501044,0.008518888,0.00033087019],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006479987,0.000008308272,0.00037877503,0.000026290192,0.0000035082548,0.00021552641,0.0038680767,0.000111167916,0.000085343,0.98310846,0.0075483923,0.004639621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006846672,0.000069372225,0.0115355225,0.0010713021,0.000074068106,0.00036652997,0.037435062,0.0014379092,0.000774153,0.34980875,0.5972242,0.00013466844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78131485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9097818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94188863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058111377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11367581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43994606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013950883","doi":"","title":"A Reply to Professor Pothier's Review of Power Without Law: TheSupreme Court of Canada, the Marshall Decisions and theFailure of Judicial Activism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Judicial activism; Power (physics); Judicial review; Judicial opinion","score_opus":0.01866275446483642,"score_gpt":0.2886034032387778,"score_spread":0.2699406487739414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013950883","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010655913,0.0024376337,0.00003758937,0.9844974,0.012464055,0.0000029554933,0.000019061812,0.0000041856792,0.0004304093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019152921,0.0013875216,0.000075619144,0.9744014,0.020058382,0.000011163145,0.000009420612,0.000024456514,0.0021167712],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9826287,0.004389004,0.0020016383,0.002825934,0.0053785504,0.0027760991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.903684,0.07092995,0.0039616046,0.00205621,0.014569065,0.0047991886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018943163,0.0013643391,0.0023301078,0.0028711173,0.015131929,0.014640379,0.0078044115,0.109036125,0.007949147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09512431,0.0015617062,0.0021096244,0.004071506,0.021625329,0.01380884,0.007950625,0.09536234,0.0026710555],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011748744,0.0000062368613,0.000077602665,0.00006806837,0.000012202044,0.00011858017,0.000744052,0.00002029612,0.00003778364,0.009784657,0.9873883,0.001730617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004396984,0.000014352932,0.0007502258,0.0006412307,0.000037620415,0.00019938241,0.004125754,0.00008478522,0.00019533181,0.0127162915,0.981108,0.00008296275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.100776196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22241326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8992238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016621679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029698271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20037925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014012931","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-38419-7_13","title":"Roadblocks and Roadmaps to Multinational Federalism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Multinational corporation; Federalism; Political science; Politics; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.03739900469730027,"score_gpt":0.28409815205892636,"score_spread":0.24669914736162607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014012931","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010883695,0.0158344,0.0090711955,0.14463368,0.0012191025,0.000046659632,0.000116410985,0.00013255306,0.8180623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6896443,0.015982835,0.012980817,0.020942306,0.0022836495,0.00033801366,0.00027718622,0.00028492935,0.25726596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972063,0.0016218431,0.00004451122,0.00020489146,0.0004693207,0.00045321236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971739,0.0017911039,0.000086323955,0.00039038731,0.00036883767,0.00018943814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048864605,0.00031943526,0.00051336625,0.0010949324,0.0048976075,0.009952019,0.0012555711,0.0038014557,0.022388373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008359521,0.00036186798,0.0003432285,0.0016407322,0.012978642,0.011670224,0.0030788204,0.0074126525,0.001614345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011901903,0.0000035243368,0.000012081835,0.0000038725284,3.3863472e-7,0.0000027763583,0.00010776281,0.0000438386,0.0000052499345,0.9932634,0.004683783,0.0018722995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033267515,0.000003791133,0.00010164284,0.000056616376,0.0000011407126,0.000007882396,0.00052160036,0.00028267695,0.0000330786,0.911544,0.08744114,0.0000030515819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013194941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033628084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022388373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008694181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009082789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074896574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014605346","doi":"","title":"Historical Society Program: Illustrious Alumni of St. John's University School of Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Economic Justice; State (computer science); Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.01981483312032384,"score_gpt":0.25640884506044287,"score_spread":0.23659401194011903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014605346","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0141878035,0.01424296,0.00054904696,0.085628405,0.02862366,0.00014844052,0.00055166386,0.00041552438,0.8556526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02005906,0.004069185,0.00036027282,0.0035613934,0.0031593207,0.00003985826,0.00017194489,0.00009265979,0.9684862],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935466,0.00007292881,0.000011689739,0.000063220235,0.00027272553,0.00022482152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841726,0.00003329614,0.000037208447,0.00002948187,0.00019999433,0.0012827243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084687065,0.0007510143,0.00021996554,0.0013729281,0.0072675375,0.0033215692,0.0005426834,0.0010820847,0.1993779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012025555,0.00035647565,0.00017670791,0.0006459333,0.0011437676,0.0013694781,0.003371775,0.0020132842,0.027109342],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061885894,0.00003949647,0.0002537284,0.000036224927,7.960766e-7,0.00008980217,0.0005165511,0.000011916333,0.00014517896,0.0026496353,0.97484,0.021410577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015708104,0.000012668831,0.0009112107,0.000045062712,7.950374e-7,0.000045713234,0.0006876959,0.00001621509,0.0000866662,0.00020869462,0.99798167,0.0000021849219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009602312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07145097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1993779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033267161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006170582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6669855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016979700","doi":"10.1017/9781108596268.005","title":"Proportionality Analysis by the Canadian Supreme Court","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Supreme court; Doctrine; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03723745045924074,"score_gpt":0.2288822759907654,"score_spread":0.19164482553152468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016979700","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014074654,0.004869765,0.0041611916,0.009111791,0.00037372732,0.00010999998,0.0003596041,0.000069498295,0.96686983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6854367,0.008048964,0.0098869195,0.0061400733,0.00025641857,0.00013934795,0.0005487063,0.00013690603,0.28940588],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880867,0.0012384586,0.00018191586,0.00087775226,0.0077441945,0.0018711155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956392,0.0010461314,0.00012817512,0.00022351857,0.0027305575,0.00023237267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003934043,0.0005395856,0.0004955721,0.006176314,0.018259889,0.009484947,0.0024556606,0.0017709285,0.010922219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012801518,0.00048010613,0.0006192715,0.0082420865,0.013642885,0.0025066398,0.0024643512,0.0036596674,0.00068140455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000493589,0.000004827214,0.00041826724,0.000031226893,0.0000044317585,0.000053330088,0.002898886,0.00038543943,0.00011069352,0.9535521,0.024273198,0.018262617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007561881,0.000012009865,0.006880922,0.0003408979,0.000028284254,0.00009733619,0.0059504164,0.0020687047,0.00051625347,0.20943317,0.77459526,0.00006916012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96789384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.979392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8684845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13151553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.122216895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9542164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3018787836","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3583497","title":"Legislated Rights in the Anglo-American Tradition","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.019757032116971485,"score_gpt":0.26909434015585876,"score_spread":0.24933730803888726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3018787836","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42078802,0.0040917303,0.0015918566,0.0136255715,0.00020109744,0.000020543732,0.000056999725,0.000011080492,0.5596132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862599,0.000396405,0.00017303685,0.0013678418,0.0000680933,0.00001201784,0.0000097255615,0.000005563587,0.011707551],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995304,0.0022112413,0.00011350693,0.000626939,0.00051770115,0.0012266233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941831,0.0037568356,0.00047052902,0.0003325527,0.00085757195,0.0003994225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053581246,0.00013257982,0.00034033993,0.0012445137,0.011488475,0.007106562,0.0007143629,0.002251992,0.004593111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0094277,0.00027333284,0.00012676399,0.0021392768,0.018034576,0.0029746692,0.001859624,0.005748551,0.0003315333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017241986,0.00003283849,0.0011631302,0.000012586676,0.0000033508547,0.000029814106,0.014171549,0.000050972587,0.0000758824,0.97874624,0.0010561842,0.0046402267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013701389,0.00016429016,0.04460372,0.0007634365,0.00009360722,0.00021051684,0.048113767,0.0012206169,0.0009546848,0.62721884,0.27643117,0.00008831445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0482985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12361688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0482985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007188763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063798605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.096034765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3024113687","doi":"10.53386/nilq.v63i3.396","title":"Law and the practice of politics in the Canadian Department of Justice: completing confederation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"U.S. Department of State","keywords":"Politics; Economic Justice; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Corporate governance; Commercial law; Legal research; Sociology; Public administration; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.02107786360967136,"score_gpt":0.28048742961075057,"score_spread":0.25940956600107923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3024113687","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21532334,0.0079591265,0.00067798345,0.15979765,0.00085168844,0.00020476186,0.0006797082,0.0000864931,0.61441934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81080115,0.0023745208,0.00084182736,0.015443212,0.00011005198,0.0000914444,0.00016588441,0.00008551132,0.17008641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863304,0.0019765822,0.00023980044,0.00070252735,0.0024053555,0.00834538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864525,0.002723817,0.00045996121,0.0003461009,0.004878336,0.005139312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01043382,0.0004478176,0.00053460087,0.0024082141,0.05392496,0.02191242,0.0032611766,0.0064618057,0.01566703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020308413,0.00064886094,0.0004972675,0.004532376,0.019373592,0.0046987133,0.0054926025,0.007867076,0.0010009424],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012118405,0.0001154035,0.0108908005,0.00016161456,0.000024413092,0.0004692242,0.16183695,0.00077775,0.00047646844,0.53676784,0.23072872,0.0576296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027551529,0.00003573071,0.037037604,0.00034260633,0.000027913222,0.00009203526,0.23851381,0.0005206672,0.00038587733,0.013021076,0.7098411,0.00015407716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99808276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71235776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2876422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4874258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8262341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3025461587","doi":"10.4324/9780429056550-3","title":"Good faith in the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Faith; Political science; Good faith; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.03236369498988826,"score_gpt":0.24194383958834198,"score_spread":0.20958014459845373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3025461587","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01745247,0.018843418,0.0014974412,0.058797818,0.0012573294,0.000063158484,0.00031683134,0.00007576387,0.90169585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6743952,0.011567933,0.001884501,0.03225005,0.0006216917,0.00006751982,0.0002727531,0.00010363563,0.27883676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935055,0.00054838345,0.00009779252,0.0005093244,0.0031203057,0.0022186988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969252,0.0008005412,0.00008057807,0.00012511086,0.0015126822,0.0005560045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023226098,0.00033748872,0.00040936272,0.0017745144,0.0238729,0.013378637,0.0017336773,0.0047975136,0.006691415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070736185,0.0004656354,0.0004360392,0.0025895073,0.014654445,0.0020978975,0.0024872038,0.0075536654,0.0006968009],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005392088,0.000005317683,0.0002565318,0.00002283303,0.0000045839897,0.00011431965,0.0020226128,0.00021305967,0.00006936099,0.939692,0.050730493,0.006863537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013937288,0.000009982887,0.0027607903,0.0003498101,0.000023954854,0.00008526623,0.003276644,0.00062870176,0.00027393654,0.11392725,0.8785618,0.00008806629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9842017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99037945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.122775346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.122775346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17294583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89080167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3027520552","doi":"","title":"Introduction: Canada's Chief Justice: Beverley McLachlin's Legacy of Law and Leadership","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.038305935165946,"score_gpt":0.273524511760051,"score_spread":0.235218576594105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3027520552","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016329299,0.15844013,0.00060422614,0.63146186,0.08189155,0.000060261507,0.0030562442,0.00020029323,0.12265253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.056057397,0.12613977,0.001547056,0.38097438,0.06967271,0.0000898843,0.0025260188,0.00036826686,0.36262444],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987565,0.000090559595,0.00003346117,0.00018980431,0.0006593043,0.0002703262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99689037,0.00043755877,0.00013607407,0.000047206664,0.0018037953,0.0006849863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001133006,0.000777396,0.00048440514,0.0022949053,0.011590323,0.0075526615,0.0015805622,0.003957066,0.027718304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00444214,0.00035161607,0.0002526011,0.004729828,0.0031986253,0.002631554,0.0018908944,0.0062475353,0.0058967317],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033548904,0.0000027409249,0.00020410302,0.000059307025,0.0000010606036,0.000023112632,0.00037963068,0.000016022757,0.000023734792,0.0036092766,0.98959243,0.006085171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023152802,0.0000030395988,0.0019033928,0.00042277272,0.000003159212,0.00004883538,0.0011379897,0.00002123451,0.000024924579,0.0012434552,0.99517846,0.000010526741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8927628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96612453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9679369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032063127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047501672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23263538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3029084391","doi":"10.1177/1473779520927715","title":"Through which glass darkly? Constitutional principle in legality and constitutionality review","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Principle of legality; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Statute; Constitution; Legitimacy; Adjudication; Common law; Interpretation (philosophy); Judicial review; Constitutional law; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10086855393848133,"score_gpt":0.38679863242556745,"score_spread":0.2859300784870861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3029084391","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015850948,0.16696914,0.027057694,0.48709932,0.007290946,0.00016281064,0.0001896087,0.00012961049,0.29525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77396244,0.0699026,0.009281349,0.08486657,0.0075623794,0.0003000995,0.00014044791,0.00014158794,0.053842563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98349285,0.010323318,0.00055427186,0.0015744753,0.002784578,0.0012704779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9813256,0.013945199,0.00075567845,0.0013194886,0.0021172767,0.0005366671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016887477,0.00024029368,0.00076760945,0.0028385809,0.00506356,0.011460696,0.0011657852,0.0052988958,0.003916821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04206261,0.00033207895,0.00042679577,0.0023205557,0.039138652,0.013926207,0.0028732847,0.0071853604,0.0006508004],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003024044,0.000003122282,0.00008045348,0.00004737507,0.0000031759787,0.000030483827,0.0008160731,0.00004625093,0.00004183188,0.9845418,0.00775482,0.006631601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010263943,0.00001939674,0.0004047261,0.0005593295,0.000013150076,0.000070430826,0.0018434741,0.00012555892,0.00017845604,0.69172734,0.3050276,0.000020280691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016459202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017909752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016887477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068206177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013366419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08931053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033121196","doi":"","title":"The Conceptual Gap Between Doré and Vavilov","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Standard of review; Law and economics; Charter; Political science; Administrative law; Sovereignty; Legislature; Law; Context (archaeology); Proportionality (law); Judicial review; Sociology; Geography; Politics","score_opus":0.04910823979702551,"score_gpt":0.2896579413424439,"score_spread":0.24054970154541838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033121196","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08030849,0.026560633,0.052575853,0.1260795,0.0017045732,0.0001442677,0.00011757259,0.00013743977,0.7123717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9623454,0.0035562185,0.0065845633,0.011586765,0.0007024334,0.0002078501,0.000050089202,0.00005775787,0.014908948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9762783,0.0105460165,0.0010779687,0.0036103008,0.0065647718,0.0019227328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833376,0.012130003,0.0012113375,0.0010146734,0.0016388699,0.0006674372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016206961,0.0004906976,0.001121826,0.0044053947,0.0063157347,0.01551494,0.0022713977,0.008975978,0.002741591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02856165,0.0006280758,0.0009270717,0.0024278678,0.041052636,0.015986245,0.0076877894,0.009988407,0.00044490639],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002555183,0.0000031514712,0.00005045846,0.00000723866,8.4357646e-7,0.00001889466,0.0014189725,0.000027660983,0.000016883232,0.9970571,0.000458058,0.00093823735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034064447,0.000040762225,0.00045594183,0.00021218183,0.000007939555,0.00030399874,0.004117913,0.0005816985,0.00026174384,0.83852714,0.15541594,0.00004073374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049048658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002887072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016206961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011438698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074443375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08571166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033268489","doi":"","title":"Adducing Social Science Evidence in Constitutional Cases","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Charter; Scholarship; Political science; Scientific evidence; Public relations; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05443690351123246,"score_gpt":0.3545228625799268,"score_spread":0.30008595906869434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033268489","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33720034,0.009716408,0.027984137,0.13661747,0.00050731614,0.0003754066,0.00015693379,0.00010450387,0.4873374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98784864,0.0017285482,0.0046641547,0.0026176702,0.00006378807,0.000052131865,0.00002520829,0.000015731483,0.0029841382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.90993816,0.056806665,0.0027807944,0.0033011134,0.020000804,0.007172406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.810778,0.16161087,0.0074073584,0.0064534163,0.011356215,0.0023940918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.074674614,0.00047633264,0.0010142651,0.010908999,0.025281992,0.021574399,0.0027809143,0.006763105,0.0028594653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1569261,0.00060504023,0.0005694371,0.008562127,0.0687225,0.018011352,0.012833097,0.0067034634,0.000263344],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015052779,0.000033482283,0.0037169436,0.00016782575,0.000022161548,0.000893259,0.115390904,0.00043199165,0.00022610296,0.85044134,0.0031438102,0.025517166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041942523,0.000080414335,0.009747108,0.0030562868,0.00009919225,0.00034971008,0.23809485,0.0016750622,0.0018194537,0.5319004,0.21299437,0.000141199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18912227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30625093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18912227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037520286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06537307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39492184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033291601","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3423147","title":"How Much French Do They Speak Anyway? A Bilingualism Index for Supreme Court Justices, 1985-2013","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Collège Montmorency; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Neuroscience of multilingualism; Index (typography); Political science; Law; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015312804971488275,"score_gpt":0.2761749314092233,"score_spread":0.260862126437735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033291601","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9895607,0.0003485393,0.000049851467,0.0005308025,0.000015967697,0.000008768596,0.0018477457,0.000005052549,0.007632626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99603504,0.00020628265,0.00006166629,0.00006529721,0.000016589753,0.000010430628,0.0012815059,0.000007212789,0.002315929],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999438,0.00008518825,0.0000480759,0.00007891996,0.00014977348,0.00019993607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968219,0.00038255763,0.0011582715,0.00006610264,0.00083070336,0.0007404342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009064254,0.00020018862,0.00021504945,0.0033764713,0.0016794686,0.0013200388,0.00036912414,0.00041307684,0.0048792474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049756807,0.00012958844,0.00025300097,0.0031513944,0.00048297632,0.0015249243,0.0012679308,0.00071338966,0.0009130299],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002159544,0.00007298689,0.9654387,0.00004588985,0.00004845515,0.00024465122,0.011516212,0.00006213374,0.0004151759,0.0009001177,0.0064674155,0.014572294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006940285,0.000028275761,0.98454756,0.000045968984,0.000019071038,0.00014182864,0.0100165345,0.00008732178,0.00012375128,0.00013745546,0.0048367437,0.000008506221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20841606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46712312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79158396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021295687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024092211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41440588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033340380","doi":"10.21991/cf29404","title":"The Toronto Municipal Election: Judicial Failure to Protect the Structure of the Canadian Constitution","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Constitution; Principle of legality; Law; Legislation; Supreme court; Political science; Judicial review; Legitimacy; Interpretation (philosophy); Subject (documents); Legislature; Democracy; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.017993900235984486,"score_gpt":0.2587652190297893,"score_spread":0.24077131879380478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033340380","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12724455,0.02166065,0.0035313752,0.2648189,0.0035113704,0.00036617383,0.0012398765,0.0002458771,0.57738113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.833937,0.006172958,0.0019727466,0.052222047,0.0007238286,0.0001348287,0.00032804298,0.00012664511,0.104381934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98332983,0.0017798728,0.00046196493,0.0016365696,0.0071707265,0.0056209946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830951,0.0061534476,0.000612447,0.00093599316,0.006706235,0.0024967862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009691735,0.00048293767,0.0005267632,0.0016917371,0.045345087,0.009200008,0.004700951,0.007731162,0.0071610804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030118536,0.0010673124,0.0005459374,0.0028196347,0.016563606,0.002346059,0.004238133,0.012220076,0.00063769275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008957065,0.000016402582,0.0051106247,0.00016695584,0.000045484365,0.001176665,0.02491752,0.00068214483,0.00062202377,0.6569443,0.2855479,0.024680456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018263502,0.000038744503,0.02360916,0.00044233733,0.00019868094,0.00029204844,0.014548594,0.0015799016,0.0014082361,0.02936415,0.9280313,0.00030410665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99635077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99878293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7973473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20265268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3255106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9248099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034724416","doi":"","title":"Popping the Question: What the Questionnaire for Federal Judicial Appointments Reveals about the Pursuit of Justice, Diversity, and the Commitment to Transparency","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Transparency (behavior); Accountability; Government (linguistics); Economic Justice; Political science; Politics; Law; Legislation; Diversity (politics); Public administration","score_opus":0.04443449321709542,"score_gpt":0.30674537207155084,"score_spread":0.2623108788544554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034724416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80572486,0.0060979472,0.015677385,0.11373948,0.0034081656,0.0029403712,0.008850083,0.00025533355,0.043306366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93111295,0.003636792,0.012227009,0.03451302,0.0007136244,0.0065685823,0.0029702408,0.00022555041,0.008032322],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97545546,0.01443864,0.0017080641,0.0013776533,0.0049746274,0.0020454982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89619744,0.05849954,0.010781263,0.0036115078,0.027110515,0.003799808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.050835468,0.00038938667,0.00066611415,0.0033444385,0.006632637,0.006234328,0.0010385612,0.0025183787,0.0041910848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16098659,0.000513017,0.000848615,0.0053419205,0.0064876396,0.003998443,0.0021846187,0.002668223,0.0016666125],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027954287,0.000242219,0.2291066,0.0017163578,0.00010662694,0.00030611674,0.46119374,0.00031150365,0.0026409593,0.034046315,0.12945317,0.14059679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007854369,0.00028852207,0.2903419,0.0029070235,0.0000659492,0.0002410915,0.3539007,0.00065108895,0.0011399973,0.0074481852,0.34262007,0.00031693405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18417397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21501824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18417397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016791338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022474121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3662039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035318609","doi":"10.1515/journal-2019-0052","title":"Judicial Review (Departmentalism) vs Supremacy: The Connection to a 17th Century Debate and a Dilemma for Today","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ICL Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Supreme court; Judicial review; Law; Legislature; State (computer science); Separation of powers; Sovereignty; Unitary state; Political science; Dilemma; Power (physics); Judicial activism; Interpretation (philosophy); Supremacy Clause; Enumerated powers; Judicial interpretation; Law and economics; Federalism; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics; Epistemology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0444017283513609,"score_gpt":0.32340335831165345,"score_spread":0.27900162996029254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035318609","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025703484,0.07152136,0.002321729,0.6710463,0.0023642585,0.000014990451,0.00006896095,0.000033213208,0.22692564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81716233,0.032342702,0.0023898385,0.092619576,0.010095356,0.00006200093,0.00005363856,0.000100973164,0.045173466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928421,0.0032781286,0.00023377166,0.00071205513,0.0018314753,0.0011026107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886241,0.0075739007,0.00067715184,0.00042197295,0.0018389315,0.00086388376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014849447,0.00023974263,0.00053254137,0.002919727,0.01026885,0.016300444,0.0015790617,0.011707363,0.004097331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01167261,0.00037771947,0.0004211907,0.0019861052,0.05032496,0.011211548,0.0022225736,0.010035045,0.00055037526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005802015,0.000008018754,0.00008758371,0.000013100516,0.000001917788,0.000046408568,0.003113324,0.000031909804,0.0000406305,0.98487306,0.008586218,0.0031921463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024834457,0.00001514206,0.0007526853,0.00038687393,0.0000064005426,0.00012534625,0.004601707,0.00022283607,0.00018370911,0.46773887,0.5259035,0.000038054284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053222507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053072687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053222507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029864553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013886981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2166835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035846376","doi":"","title":"American Rights Jurisprudence Through Canadian Eyes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Scrutiny; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Bill of rights; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02427279767133124,"score_gpt":0.28624834494148926,"score_spread":0.26197554727015804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035846376","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038665172,0.0077760564,0.0022320754,0.05368873,0.0012369372,0.00002286855,0.000184728,0.000067448585,0.9309247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46021742,0.018035036,0.0073131267,0.042226024,0.0016213434,0.00012125433,0.0002791192,0.00024733995,0.46993923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935296,0.0010936128,0.00013919488,0.0009226575,0.0031192405,0.0011957213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966748,0.00088958186,0.00011721944,0.00021606205,0.0015536816,0.00054859545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037820728,0.0008144943,0.00060802145,0.0035823646,0.023576858,0.014778095,0.0020094735,0.0057166275,0.01893559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066340016,0.0005093679,0.0006635756,0.0036358226,0.027669907,0.0061480543,0.005556637,0.008867604,0.002060238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004548561,0.0000058002584,0.00006879394,0.000012845678,0.0000016742717,0.00002746654,0.0020470954,0.00003815829,0.000041959793,0.9724753,0.020938542,0.00433783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009559343,0.000005527629,0.00050131173,0.00012681689,0.000009385004,0.000057381225,0.002162698,0.00020047279,0.00008646816,0.12806848,0.86874676,0.000025183523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9306705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94303274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10590286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10590286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.086955175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7683826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037170927","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2020.1782948","title":"Diverse and inclusive high courts: a global and intersectional perspective","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Groups and Identities","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Intersectionality; Perspective (graphical); Privilege (computing); Gender studies; Diversity (politics); Race (biology); Disadvantage; Context (archaeology); Representation (politics); Sociology; Political science; Law; Politics; Geography; Anthropology","score_opus":0.017982904699169387,"score_gpt":0.28876736899116867,"score_spread":0.27078446429199926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037170927","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2445417,0.0068702693,0.011719685,0.026055714,0.0001640043,0.000039609746,0.000054722834,0.000025757303,0.7105286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929819,0.0011334753,0.0009167737,0.00086936157,0.00007215585,0.000015691112,0.000015481191,0.00001676053,0.003978281],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98964417,0.0066572307,0.00014620803,0.00067974854,0.0012718241,0.0016009673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956126,0.0022571646,0.00038372565,0.00047717645,0.00047680593,0.0007925684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061040125,0.0004697366,0.0007028198,0.0049511255,0.016192226,0.025591502,0.0013037856,0.0025112687,0.005145588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004145582,0.0003024585,0.00036151096,0.0038410472,0.06789874,0.0138952425,0.017168943,0.004903942,0.00025723025],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007066196,0.000015317913,0.002083288,0.000036502042,0.000008926157,0.0001639757,0.08389795,0.00011594044,0.0001634165,0.90446556,0.00064178015,0.008400252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007918454,0.00004270612,0.006890825,0.00046646732,0.000036164904,0.00040967937,0.34811312,0.0003068709,0.00051386846,0.52679336,0.11639275,0.00002629796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00889978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015562011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025591502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00713101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005335104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051739335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038032516","doi":"","title":"National Security And Judicial Ethics: The Exception To The Rule Of Keeping Judicial Conduct Judicial And The Politicization Of The Judiciary","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UNM’s Digital Repository (University of New Mexico)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Judicial review; Judicial activism; National security; Presidential system; Judicial independence; Supreme court; Separation of powers; Judicial opinion; Certiorari; Doctrine; Judicial discretion; Legislature; Politics; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.045375382362480766,"score_gpt":0.26561404316087267,"score_spread":0.2202386607983919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3038032516","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07057917,0.016402083,0.016703105,0.24539688,0.0013639125,0.000033783017,0.000033737844,0.000035393663,0.649452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96356434,0.0021074526,0.002687554,0.015742585,0.0008904881,0.00005180613,0.000011277605,0.000032507283,0.014911966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9732953,0.017492475,0.0008134136,0.0022545313,0.004181394,0.0019629449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988884,0.0071420143,0.0009047991,0.0012273699,0.0012314449,0.00061041745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017797245,0.00018058968,0.00039399057,0.00080467615,0.009741218,0.014210892,0.0012293063,0.0072153844,0.0013147171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022821983,0.0003344255,0.00031469887,0.0010444759,0.054543182,0.0070751994,0.0032703904,0.009678777,0.00032017098],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030331191,0.0000022164336,0.00015548791,0.0000045756424,9.818982e-7,0.000015615282,0.001691405,0.00004682438,0.000023880113,0.9952964,0.0011806132,0.0015787842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001658307,0.000016561135,0.0015338003,0.00022252533,0.000006056785,0.00007660245,0.0039252597,0.00045987603,0.00021305404,0.891241,0.10226982,0.000018787227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0140275145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024975847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017797245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009635453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015180271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09412193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042348065","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0043","title":"The constitutional office of the legislature","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Normative; Constitutional theory; Political science; Power (physics); Constitutional law; Law and economics; Law; Constitutional economics; Constitutional review; Sociology; Constitution; Physics","score_opus":0.016714622466399664,"score_gpt":0.22174458412907877,"score_spread":0.20502996166267912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3042348065","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04316799,0.008121789,0.016717354,0.031724013,0.00076712365,0.000043761967,0.000272117,0.000111368456,0.8990745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9431599,0.002189225,0.0021169167,0.0023497879,0.0005360099,0.00004596225,0.00011877487,0.00004381718,0.0494397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948095,0.0021076738,0.00022398456,0.00080337434,0.0011737334,0.0008817398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995395,0.0022375472,0.000437762,0.0005582767,0.00075406,0.0006173549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056608827,0.00014817266,0.0003878133,0.000901927,0.0035779593,0.007262351,0.00067371235,0.0017376248,0.0043377993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077733467,0.00025294308,0.00019350428,0.00088521134,0.019282991,0.0032426652,0.0026223825,0.0028951464,0.00078052253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002887878,0.0000012345948,0.000088427274,0.00000624431,9.776438e-7,0.000007758122,0.00091218343,0.00003156606,0.00006422421,0.99604744,0.00092634244,0.0019108319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031267293,0.000037155194,0.002480751,0.00017298681,0.00002026507,0.000066545974,0.002147267,0.00036152502,0.0005761252,0.44488192,0.5491969,0.000027298305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03284262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03863441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03284262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005938375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013705925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06530297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044361466","doi":"","title":"The Senate’s Review of Bills from the Commons, 1997-2015","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Political Science Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Legislation; Legislature; Commons; Legislative process; House of Representatives; Political science; Select committee; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Law; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology; Parliament","score_opus":0.043125629231409085,"score_gpt":0.3473873744301275,"score_spread":0.3042617451987184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3044361466","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02667346,0.44996685,0.001930726,0.10625761,0.009748422,0.00063320406,0.02353112,0.00028158483,0.38097703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31509462,0.42424288,0.004269708,0.0634686,0.0041776416,0.00092646223,0.017866401,0.00061307783,0.16934064],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9691975,0.0031239428,0.0022383216,0.0010633243,0.022298671,0.0020781853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93239856,0.011513556,0.003996047,0.00210386,0.04844943,0.0015385199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022599153,0.0005694105,0.001065159,0.016838858,0.0066060545,0.0062398957,0.0017508117,0.002032684,0.0060115512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049708683,0.0008616438,0.0009318814,0.028880714,0.0035760878,0.002022801,0.0017274924,0.0038264715,0.0019404248],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006166316,0.000019537925,0.005488451,0.0036717313,0.00016188931,0.00031877577,0.0029328014,0.00046902674,0.00066052284,0.06624302,0.8242486,0.09572405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004996132,0.00000785595,0.016428802,0.0010345969,0.000051446514,0.000051600065,0.00042760198,0.000026475174,0.00033716517,0.00040148804,0.9812044,0.000023490089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6832619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8031711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95632166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043678332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12316187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6372069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044743545","doi":"10.32920/22341316","title":"Experimenting with Credibility in Refugee Adjudication: Gaydar","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; York University","keywords":"Refugee; Credibility; Persecution; Plaintiff; Adjudication; Immigration; Refugee law; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.05229393169868993,"score_gpt":0.35086599059646656,"score_spread":0.2985720588977766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3044743545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97308606,0.00006607313,0.0032994237,0.0023116586,0.000093726514,0.00040864805,0.000042999527,0.000025208401,0.020666167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930441,0.00004261313,0.0040836376,0.0006417516,0.000033634362,0.00029067267,0.000019433392,0.0000122252,0.0018319108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96610403,0.026966657,0.0009240928,0.0020353708,0.0031471408,0.0008226775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6843262,0.28144118,0.0131758,0.013068226,0.0053819767,0.0026065826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044436377,0.00038248108,0.0005966304,0.00045343462,0.005100024,0.005824997,0.0019528023,0.0036215081,0.00837787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20101565,0.0006394845,0.00046613233,0.00052784785,0.009673541,0.0052811387,0.003204368,0.005554203,0.000804307],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.027381092,0.034546234,0.09607897,0.0015422122,0.00048405418,0.003186402,0.274554,0.015504616,0.05727702,0.33641803,0.010777758,0.14224963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02545163,0.055304002,0.09174692,0.0020285558,0.0011207922,0.0016665247,0.13911553,0.15278168,0.089647725,0.33007675,0.10968513,0.0013748402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074185664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012095348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044436377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034553718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045206314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23500484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044832999","doi":"10.24124/c677/20191602","title":"A Question They Can't Refuse? Canadian Reference Questions and Judicial Independence","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Political Science Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial discretion; Discretion; Independence (probability theory); Law; Statutory law; Political science; Power (physics); Judicial independence; Judicial review; Supreme court","score_opus":0.043209831112438424,"score_gpt":0.34774558991949917,"score_spread":0.30453575880706074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3044832999","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5566778,0.013475431,0.008846413,0.08586898,0.00045565647,0.00027246104,0.0059262277,0.000113121016,0.3283639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814488,0.0020641931,0.001241381,0.0051487144,0.000113660506,0.000034232784,0.00094750477,0.00004830714,0.008953291],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9693853,0.0039059422,0.0011931473,0.0031892646,0.016773643,0.0055526365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91613466,0.040083345,0.010492822,0.0059396774,0.023199422,0.0041500665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025625044,0.00021296003,0.0010468184,0.0060240445,0.0129876435,0.0078501785,0.00258866,0.0017096318,0.0064364863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12953536,0.00047021353,0.00048864225,0.013325869,0.012866497,0.00392913,0.0039422675,0.0034408646,0.000485678],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029254606,0.000058058067,0.21394919,0.0005717488,0.00024870917,0.0014062715,0.099772386,0.0012886791,0.0011000534,0.43006742,0.082052775,0.16919222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006380277,0.000031231993,0.48372054,0.0009351089,0.00015173973,0.0004759682,0.038648043,0.0016940072,0.0011898058,0.05046125,0.4224306,0.00019786591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96428394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98270667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9575795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04242052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.072870195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30778384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3049061861","doi":"","title":"Unholy Trinity: The Failure of Administrative Constitutionalism in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CentAUR (University of Reading)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitutionalism; Charter; Law; Administrative law; Political science; Deference; Jurisprudence; Judicial review; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.052405010072611426,"score_gpt":0.24742039306486835,"score_spread":0.19501538299225693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3049061861","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26899835,0.0062407544,0.004082542,0.17897397,0.00085421803,0.00012110877,0.00027814123,0.00018805159,0.5402629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9424674,0.0018675666,0.0013669011,0.01640563,0.00009745957,0.000029135743,0.00007967781,0.000072929695,0.037613355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99075234,0.0010756463,0.00018928132,0.0008209219,0.0036982342,0.0034634941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894721,0.003194053,0.00050915853,0.00047414142,0.004361974,0.0019885355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004656761,0.0002608678,0.00047961395,0.0016058375,0.035131376,0.011035484,0.0021652335,0.0035582678,0.0034316548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01836405,0.00045814234,0.00039847265,0.0027205339,0.01757164,0.0027555646,0.0042452947,0.009121663,0.0001958003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042322343,0.0000238692,0.0065392605,0.000059140366,0.00003194378,0.0007544619,0.018888852,0.0009030993,0.00035318854,0.89951897,0.049178522,0.023706375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009632993,0.00006806546,0.03836126,0.0004992936,0.00016571114,0.0004454735,0.04837404,0.00582217,0.0019056909,0.18300533,0.7207724,0.00048428978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99581546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99792683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8454945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15450548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26963663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9806538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3049382754","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3641697","title":"Legislated Rights in the Real World","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science","score_opus":0.02222264136852277,"score_gpt":0.2858824229701268,"score_spread":0.263659781601604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3049382754","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31660613,0.0038921763,0.012006104,0.06007528,0.00043517302,0.000052760668,0.000805018,0.000051581745,0.6060758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935045,0.00031616198,0.00044632846,0.0012105801,0.00008371317,0.000028300967,0.00006239311,0.000011184078,0.0043368917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98173964,0.011623635,0.00047791688,0.0018508225,0.002341516,0.001966408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9795442,0.01346432,0.0019285323,0.0024004395,0.0017967208,0.00086571835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0125718415,0.00016695418,0.00063836103,0.0015715206,0.0041366937,0.012164571,0.0012458486,0.0047397106,0.010743122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030969933,0.0003444888,0.00039149294,0.0022828563,0.017969038,0.008766122,0.002885236,0.0045779822,0.00067508745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010584747,0.000038902264,0.00071596215,0.000014365932,0.00001122748,0.000034068056,0.001038859,0.00030413564,0.000065191736,0.9938526,0.0016354243,0.002278665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034876226,0.000032589516,0.003731044,0.0001123251,0.000017432087,0.00007221982,0.0047381776,0.0010431873,0.00020080355,0.9519627,0.038026165,0.000028537721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052651335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008836677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0125718415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004631828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034753177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066487074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3049611617","doi":"","title":"Electoral Rules, Corruption Charges, and Electoral Accountability: Comparative Analysis of Italy, Japan, and the United States","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Political science; Language change; State (computer science); Federalism; Electoral geography; Electoral system; Public administration; Political economy; Economics; Law; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.04438197163503042,"score_gpt":0.30739285990858534,"score_spread":0.2630108882735549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3049611617","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99593097,0.000250499,0.00003005869,0.00018390927,0.0000045652787,0.0000030040019,0.00011705402,0.0000021036594,0.0034779408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99938774,0.00011963316,0.000015526637,0.00002192622,0.000008324715,0.0000026467285,0.00015804383,0.0000017128913,0.00028436797],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991848,0.00027139057,0.00005375043,0.00006317652,0.00012639348,0.00030056905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950187,0.001604331,0.001964377,0.00018842504,0.0005985837,0.00062559516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015904935,0.0001347253,0.00047246605,0.0028163013,0.0010490319,0.002239666,0.00038907517,0.00037053777,0.0026777543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006372335,0.00017891977,0.00044153043,0.005231169,0.0011877206,0.0008093652,0.0012184607,0.0006546405,0.00018889974],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037800884,0.00012179063,0.98067456,0.000057492307,0.00018844979,0.0002935142,0.0032205146,0.0007755284,0.00018082574,0.004133527,0.0013525906,0.008623246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016798724,0.0000406617,0.9947096,0.000012495973,0.00009751928,0.00004448179,0.0032867703,0.00032668372,0.00004579559,0.00026305107,0.0011492973,0.000006882916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059562393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16035508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059562393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016635789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013805085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11843139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3061143068","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v10i2.9461","title":"Retreating to Justiciability","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Charter; Subjectivity; Law; Political science; Scope (computer science); Law and economics; Moral agency; Politics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.12165769100275119,"score_gpt":0.38900445348464635,"score_spread":0.26734676248189515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3061143068","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19235651,0.00270086,0.038566783,0.053407565,0.00058217,0.0004000997,0.00007733279,0.00008640378,0.7118222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98289293,0.00040923257,0.0022501503,0.0047025336,0.00011659968,0.00008293435,0.000027543165,0.000034324243,0.009483779],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9363014,0.01987491,0.0024403364,0.0063174698,0.026843108,0.008222723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9094612,0.047501646,0.0058147586,0.0067444723,0.027042774,0.0034351533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0361438,0.0006213223,0.0009269472,0.003930709,0.013883069,0.013344641,0.002759905,0.0036812464,0.0058019627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14082424,0.00041797885,0.00075611466,0.0020992165,0.051365398,0.011459254,0.010345543,0.010771212,0.00055355445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031282714,0.000025243897,0.0042959214,0.00006663457,0.000012465615,0.00030202634,0.031985436,0.00034674033,0.00063892035,0.93607855,0.0032398554,0.022976942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040435123,0.00008774787,0.015285993,0.0006213699,0.000050383114,0.00027521118,0.031965088,0.0018229274,0.0021457858,0.76996285,0.17759907,0.00014330083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22866705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2072178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22866705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02972239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03593309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4546721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081936494","doi":"10.7202/1075519ar","title":"Common Law Constitutionalism Through Methodology","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Common law; Law; Political science; Cornerstone; Legal culture; Comparative law; Public law; Legislature; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.16479050332137934,"score_gpt":0.3890236582032524,"score_spread":0.22423315488187306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081936494","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010507312,0.0070545278,0.5983639,0.0685713,0.001119752,0.0002930117,0.00018832402,0.00029191584,0.31361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76679313,0.0044227485,0.18126805,0.010993098,0.0014409146,0.0012501888,0.00018029237,0.0003037217,0.033347838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95612305,0.031836588,0.0014407309,0.004506907,0.004662149,0.0014305767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96552837,0.022330256,0.0019309035,0.0068557323,0.0025481924,0.0008065201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.061314527,0.0007221262,0.0010673093,0.0031121091,0.006247754,0.014948637,0.0027235849,0.004190987,0.0045317863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040304944,0.00053921796,0.00129566,0.00220113,0.06854255,0.0149708,0.008608912,0.008465364,0.00096020283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.9531227e-7,0.0000019555735,0.000023629844,0.000010045623,0.000001986917,0.0000052043447,0.00030537718,0.00009555194,0.000009017979,0.99823904,0.0002883788,0.0010189108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005168362,0.0000049580985,0.000024131454,0.00003798594,0.0000027623043,0.000010829143,0.000114970135,0.00025944773,0.00005158147,0.98187286,0.017611336,0.0000039357915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004593685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033449393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061314527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011034766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016053721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32426608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082049084","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v13n3p212","title":"From Manshiya to Alexandria: Re-Examining the Process of Constitutionalizing and Normalizing the Emergency Status in Egypt","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Transformative learning; Vitality; Constitutionalism; Politics; Context (archaeology); Rule of law; Corporate governance; Law; Order (exchange); Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Democracy; History; Management; Philosophy; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.0530302037109409,"score_gpt":0.32738181892041684,"score_spread":0.27435161520947593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082049084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62098825,0.0074744485,0.0030899213,0.040565293,0.00047661993,0.00010205842,0.0000747427,0.00005467098,0.32717407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818525,0.0010766619,0.0006204187,0.0017447703,0.00005801028,0.000019716987,0.0000217286,0.000025069308,0.01458112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794215,0.0008079011,0.00009526152,0.00014073921,0.00029166183,0.00072223693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846554,0.0008078493,0.00014640004,0.00016635892,0.00030363214,0.00011025727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005902504,0.00027774987,0.00033126507,0.0012376916,0.010239349,0.008467333,0.0011281354,0.003038277,0.0034272515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058199926,0.0002579127,0.00024678424,0.001346565,0.021954643,0.004319995,0.005079615,0.004951913,0.0002635859],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006467822,0.000023789158,0.0012760833,0.00010591787,0.000010776064,0.0009350156,0.12466603,0.0004156281,0.0007788892,0.8442698,0.0034835313,0.023969933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061677594,0.00010135146,0.016594622,0.00071450573,0.00008051597,0.00057099515,0.30322742,0.000800857,0.004437271,0.1311244,0.542152,0.00013434085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06174747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.095476784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06174747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021432934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01664056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15550756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082112013","doi":"10.1017/glj.2020.50","title":"The Conceptualization of Constitutional Supremacy: Global Discourse and Legal Tradition","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nova Scotia Department of Agriculture; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Law; Constitution; Political science; Doctrine; White supremacy; Supremacy Clause; Constitutional law; Sociology; Statute; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.03277042819051123,"score_gpt":0.3293126719201979,"score_spread":0.2965422437296867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082112013","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29182017,0.01844704,0.02971338,0.03250815,0.00035730176,0.000037598267,0.00007272187,0.00010049793,0.6269431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972555,0.00062563334,0.00058959,0.00023446736,0.000048226324,0.000007783148,0.0000094998495,0.0000115062585,0.001217815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99494815,0.0034806589,0.00014603061,0.0006093557,0.000494594,0.0003212497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99258834,0.0054456247,0.00053829845,0.00079098565,0.0003850907,0.000251776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005759561,0.00034486683,0.0005846792,0.0037914126,0.0038914203,0.008590467,0.0011650765,0.0025015874,0.003716719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067339903,0.00022994324,0.00026923852,0.0035044774,0.07557997,0.008948902,0.0049697263,0.004701928,0.00018062792],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033029523,0.000002465361,0.00014423353,0.000019601033,0.000002476594,0.000033989567,0.01641144,0.0001106685,0.00006836137,0.981644,0.00011693518,0.0014426429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025721252,0.000037129066,0.0018315901,0.00043819114,0.000025792537,0.00018056916,0.026071342,0.0008710521,0.0003375014,0.9093706,0.060789034,0.000021450838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006550458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050385776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00872688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00872688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025650484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06331825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082371789","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i30.5994","title":"Justifying Particular Reasoning in a Legal Context","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Judgement; Relevance (law); Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Practical reason; Analytic reasoning; Deductive reasoning; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06630570841419381,"score_gpt":0.3038539489600181,"score_spread":0.2375482405458243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082371789","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1046515,0.003146748,0.55699044,0.037651356,0.00075147237,0.00038036998,0.00022895393,0.0005161436,0.29568306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9197899,0.00063424045,0.072587885,0.0021755453,0.00026211044,0.00012461106,0.00009417833,0.000082582876,0.0042490955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9795786,0.010779335,0.001137145,0.003889099,0.0032816713,0.001334002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97083056,0.019638728,0.0015990807,0.0052895355,0.0021726375,0.0004695238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020007065,0.0006389746,0.0012716897,0.0023345295,0.005309948,0.005496094,0.0027960287,0.006028777,0.006819742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037521783,0.0006740848,0.0019200589,0.0015459374,0.038149778,0.014247713,0.008816874,0.0065350933,0.0006162408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047008493,0.0000054411016,0.00010255411,0.000033173055,0.000008972417,0.000067041205,0.0011161979,0.00030113827,0.00009231204,0.995387,0.00039894663,0.0024825411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010139519,0.00000992544,0.00013788146,0.000066055385,0.000010929307,0.00005868491,0.00044817914,0.00079228065,0.00025018593,0.986427,0.011777039,0.0000117292375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037703433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043131863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020007065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004744533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037224249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.105808735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082811238","doi":"10.1093/icon/moaa055","title":"Populist rhetoric, false mirroring, and the courts","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mirroring; Rhetoric; Populism; Politics; Democracy; Representation (politics); Political science; Narrative; Sociology; Law; Law and economics","score_opus":0.035146984231668114,"score_gpt":0.3140154183536302,"score_spread":0.2788684341219621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082811238","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26239952,0.005681885,0.019651229,0.073103,0.00087923853,0.000070977105,0.000064692176,0.00009665717,0.6380528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99378914,0.00024978613,0.00074285525,0.0014327877,0.00012030822,0.000014287343,0.0000050311473,0.00001602825,0.0036296383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887515,0.007889609,0.0002137076,0.0005696674,0.0019023279,0.0006732241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.971764,0.023464425,0.0014421573,0.0013937295,0.00153073,0.0004049856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0125541445,0.00036900697,0.00044340693,0.002000124,0.010425395,0.012008046,0.001538818,0.0046557244,0.003696648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021523882,0.00031444995,0.00021354154,0.0012644376,0.036386278,0.007133577,0.003911922,0.005273434,0.00039264056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010459616,0.000009803341,0.00030111396,0.000020101937,0.0000027126205,0.00019937316,0.009795245,0.00009622171,0.00011840711,0.9853513,0.0018401998,0.0022551664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005334429,0.00008025327,0.0009377088,0.00045584104,0.00002766204,0.000557329,0.021336675,0.0032582164,0.0029224015,0.83434933,0.13596812,0.000053186406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003170946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037981253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0125541445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067980858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024344085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066393435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3083185186","doi":"10.1017/cls.2020.7","title":"The Aftermath of Human Rights Protections: Gender Identity, Gender Expression, and the Socio-Legal Regulation of School Boards","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Queen's University; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Human rights; Redress; Political science; Harassment; Transgender; Context (archaeology); Gender studies; Identity (music); Fundamental rights; Norm (philosophy); Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.028998707744399076,"score_gpt":0.27965017381317503,"score_spread":0.250651466068776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3083185186","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79054284,0.0011467492,0.004297766,0.047104932,0.0002547033,0.00012028313,0.00013908929,0.0000379389,0.15635577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99233353,0.00012583303,0.00030205934,0.0007499596,0.000017188,0.000017973145,0.000012652225,0.000008472716,0.006432399],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98695135,0.005933199,0.0002897899,0.0012128066,0.0029321609,0.0026807243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9787911,0.008328209,0.003548545,0.0015266046,0.0047096782,0.0030958545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013562131,0.00013646287,0.00021161784,0.0011422025,0.017174141,0.0107798735,0.0015901665,0.002297174,0.0053778733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023711195,0.00031499812,0.00020657545,0.0011733276,0.039927974,0.0039314297,0.0056685535,0.0028814797,0.00026408094],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005873715,0.00006167347,0.047139905,0.00009110306,0.000011321551,0.0006070509,0.66796887,0.00040872456,0.001694079,0.2451537,0.008955372,0.027849443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023569843,0.000055428318,0.09826763,0.0005915781,0.000022795946,0.000085035696,0.5650011,0.00057045196,0.0015196125,0.022063702,0.31171682,0.00008228308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7647343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8825818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23526567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07211234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05780031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5232141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3083505379","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: On The Web: Where to Find Canadian Legislation: Pre-Confederation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Business; Political science; World Wide Web; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.037650804471501036,"score_gpt":0.28518177296294545,"score_spread":0.2475309684914444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3083505379","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013291446,0.009902839,0.0010173979,0.04968517,0.00040329856,0.000082107166,0.0067949314,0.00050426845,0.9183185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14089283,0.00838083,0.002875525,0.008639563,0.00012519237,0.00009530602,0.0022791638,0.0005110462,0.8362006],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801815,0.00015243972,0.000044094348,0.00013042105,0.0011295999,0.00052524585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969593,0.00067143486,0.00007290627,0.000109941546,0.0017903853,0.00039605782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014452781,0.00039992214,0.0002974053,0.0051234425,0.014808736,0.013067618,0.0011194241,0.003493209,0.08474713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061391015,0.0003839634,0.0002903266,0.008968918,0.004720746,0.0056688543,0.0020330865,0.003073607,0.0066703274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021100615,0.000023710576,0.00228785,0.00013830607,0.0000061915707,0.00018451392,0.009732477,0.00010464252,0.00021099759,0.25693703,0.6680753,0.06227789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040183486,0.0000028534116,0.0054487465,0.00020571002,0.0000062130894,0.000042874202,0.0078031747,0.00009030449,0.0002406531,0.006121687,0.9800069,0.000026892802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99076325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9957035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08474713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.072400495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1469032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5253048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3084062994","doi":"10.1080/02722011.2020.1771527","title":"Do Lawyers Get More Votes?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Review of Canadian Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Period (music); Law; Public administration; Contingent vote; Politics; Voting; Group voting ticket","score_opus":0.07521940611557995,"score_gpt":0.36056821431651787,"score_spread":0.2853488082009379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3084062994","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9165444,0.00557907,0.0003434847,0.02204931,0.0003910348,0.00004932239,0.0047633518,0.000049382874,0.050230723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98412734,0.0015752643,0.00011715209,0.0026288128,0.00018789321,0.000013597522,0.001201946,0.000020735883,0.01012715],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764353,0.00039345017,0.00008341348,0.00035702455,0.0006675411,0.0008551067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99059653,0.0017676231,0.0034385787,0.00044135508,0.0016949773,0.0020610006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013945153,0.00010028418,0.0004376804,0.0022380168,0.0021433185,0.0021525065,0.0005613947,0.00081629027,0.013918947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01352779,0.00020431358,0.00020302045,0.0041894154,0.00095459475,0.0010922784,0.0006542254,0.0011118884,0.0018881749],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015025934,0.00012728457,0.859462,0.00023293117,0.00012607912,0.00013461955,0.005945214,0.00011425918,0.00033288205,0.0039546555,0.038790785,0.09062905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018429639,0.000028774708,0.9512619,0.000064687294,0.000025955747,0.000042562206,0.00418622,0.000046464058,0.000088902474,0.00051696884,0.043706898,0.00001218858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43409887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70637155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56590116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039103245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003924719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8631443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3085760204","doi":"","title":"The Circumstances of Change: Understanding the Bedford/Carter Exceptions to Vertical Stare Decisis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Test (biology); Political science; Power (physics); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.12143346184579802,"score_gpt":0.3289834913742068,"score_spread":0.20755002952840879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3085760204","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27232522,0.002291492,0.016692292,0.039146654,0.00046560526,0.00009729107,0.00009561159,0.000044919474,0.6688409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918915,0.000489306,0.001292368,0.0019532372,0.0001268658,0.000043946875,0.000028049739,0.000018999523,0.004155741],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920527,0.0031386425,0.0004410104,0.0010851426,0.001478529,0.0018040345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99059194,0.0052102017,0.0017445692,0.00095450116,0.0010325343,0.00046624776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072916895,0.00020549283,0.00050462375,0.0018545452,0.007669859,0.011385837,0.001317988,0.0054777497,0.0033251164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023664279,0.00050833455,0.00045760526,0.0015058137,0.03553822,0.011054397,0.0077575226,0.008894419,0.00035842624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009091008,0.000007946782,0.0010631754,0.000011204067,0.0000020795703,0.00019656391,0.005234131,0.00015338605,0.000042940977,0.9907232,0.0005726725,0.0019837224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024302159,0.00003091708,0.0049233185,0.00024319883,0.000014843106,0.00036200217,0.022928804,0.0011205709,0.00032726262,0.9062701,0.06370942,0.000045187633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011743643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013741493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011743643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064193164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054030525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046575606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088099997","doi":"10.9734/jesbs/2020/v33i930253","title":"Legal and Political Considerations Associated with the Cancellation of the Court Challenges Program of Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education Society and Behavioural Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; The Lung Association Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Government (linguistics); Constitution; Politics; Supreme court; Conservative government; Political science; Public administration; Interpretation (philosophy); Subsidy; Demise; Sociology","score_opus":0.054614056148461126,"score_gpt":0.3153950855019081,"score_spread":0.26078102935344694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3088099997","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16999678,0.012203697,0.003234821,0.4364958,0.0023318313,0.0002455039,0.0003345282,0.0000697795,0.3750873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89126486,0.0049909744,0.0013289877,0.055621807,0.00071189436,0.00011264794,0.00010015217,0.00007927813,0.045789514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9760241,0.0037934675,0.00057607604,0.0017868824,0.01015541,0.007664144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96445113,0.016701974,0.0022049707,0.0007821807,0.010547162,0.005312659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01701268,0.0002541455,0.0004773171,0.0019406806,0.05081735,0.018392326,0.003464515,0.0065771323,0.003994611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044954773,0.00066258287,0.0005102579,0.0029800565,0.023084974,0.0037876717,0.005147363,0.015824962,0.00021045942],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037548612,0.000047746562,0.0070076766,0.00014351391,0.00002190887,0.0011824355,0.06003472,0.00045395934,0.00043338444,0.82390493,0.07694611,0.029786063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036489175,0.00004681288,0.027626263,0.00075274473,0.00006207935,0.00031100126,0.08223771,0.0006683197,0.00098279,0.025441542,0.86156535,0.0002688818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9855328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99214524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16654423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16654423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32411042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96669054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3089379721","doi":"10.1177/1354066120938843","title":"Domestic courts, transnational law, and international order","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"International law; Law; Sovereignty; Political science; Municipal law; Extraterritoriality; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics; Jurisdiction","score_opus":0.03355747996606828,"score_gpt":0.29905330554225196,"score_spread":0.2654958255761837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3089379721","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.104629435,0.020495346,0.01722709,0.0337246,0.0004070926,0.000030549912,0.000055741883,0.000052713833,0.82337743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9803524,0.005549909,0.001724525,0.0023490496,0.00021692972,0.00003580421,0.000028969429,0.0000235816,0.009718955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964586,0.0016418461,0.00017083988,0.0005064974,0.000618171,0.00060402794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99541336,0.0027519015,0.00061010825,0.00047908365,0.000455525,0.0002899721],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003278491,0.00020717233,0.00041754838,0.0023991833,0.0036553163,0.010630597,0.00087700103,0.0022487456,0.0069661606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005430167,0.00018754922,0.00037126898,0.0025672524,0.024863627,0.010880245,0.005587198,0.0036201167,0.00037071705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.40978e-7,0.0000029270634,0.00020311504,0.0000074151912,9.566982e-7,0.000026733938,0.0013653474,0.000059559254,0.00001637267,0.9959196,0.00023654809,0.0021604737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009692354,0.000020684138,0.002156727,0.00028816878,0.000011911002,0.0001975458,0.0097853,0.00055333413,0.00017142383,0.8859653,0.100822784,0.00001710878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00581381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071664825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010630597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004909311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039047492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035619676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3090639801","doi":"","title":"Elements and Implications of the Supreme Court's New Rigorous Approach to Construction of Statutory Purpose","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Supreme court; Statutory law; Legislature; Adjudication; Political science; Law; Legislative intent; Proportionality (law); Legislation; Charter; Legislative history; Adversarial system; Judicial interpretation; Law and economics; Judicial review; Sociology","score_opus":0.015545169740111258,"score_gpt":0.2664079380660819,"score_spread":0.2508627683259706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3090639801","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058483113,0.0052941716,0.07518029,0.37788537,0.0023012816,0.00042806074,0.0003787191,0.00028986172,0.47975916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8821989,0.0014984776,0.03381574,0.04923202,0.0019348458,0.0004520128,0.00013213525,0.00019662385,0.030539263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9407486,0.014921565,0.0023249853,0.005704257,0.02915095,0.0071495785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9696592,0.014134609,0.0011883813,0.0038899994,0.008997971,0.0021298246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04021426,0.00091215427,0.0015348617,0.0043323576,0.017539902,0.02437806,0.0072383126,0.015589853,0.0020357526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035527304,0.0014089764,0.0017613934,0.0028462615,0.09869142,0.009554782,0.009318931,0.032301057,0.0005284686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039034658,0.000005987646,0.00008162095,0.0000052141218,0.0000036256727,0.000033976394,0.0007640487,0.0001501862,0.00005452882,0.99673426,0.0011565692,0.0010061959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006269418,0.000020143125,0.0009070546,0.00012398562,0.000027988983,0.000042543797,0.0007082321,0.001786731,0.00035070747,0.9596579,0.036227405,0.00008456045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48836583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.50696236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48836583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.073139176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.102616265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97104645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3091932690","doi":"10.1111/lapo.12156","title":"Can a leopard change its spots? Strategic behavior versus professional role conception during Ukraine's 2014 court chair elections","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ballot; Law; Judicial independence; Ukrainian; Judicial reform; Political science; Judicial activism; Incentive; Impartiality; Sociology; Supreme court; Judicial review; Politics; Voting; Economics","score_opus":0.09939561497367691,"score_gpt":0.35899351728644147,"score_spread":0.2595979023127646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3091932690","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9930508,0.00007453688,0.00014916783,0.0004127045,0.0000068843074,0.0000035358823,0.000016538725,0.0000021301769,0.006283655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992662,0.000012674641,0.000015917298,0.00002973292,0.0000012963936,7.4699017e-7,0.000006129547,9.1977273e-7,0.0006664182],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984565,0.0005995216,0.000052884992,0.00023190153,0.0001761539,0.0004831114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983121,0.00046429844,0.00052748126,0.00011470092,0.0002860636,0.0002953923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022324212,0.000050980078,0.0001995304,0.0005001184,0.0020603098,0.0024825896,0.00031073458,0.00040928353,0.001720861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039668325,0.000107855834,0.000086840155,0.00048679265,0.0015424981,0.00070730725,0.0010504143,0.00076845364,0.0002208027],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032589672,0.00019302352,0.70431745,0.00009732211,0.00006280377,0.0011820832,0.15894349,0.001730799,0.0056131035,0.05865729,0.0058859847,0.06299075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000921684,0.00012229529,0.8218557,0.000061142135,0.000021060067,0.00016604488,0.14234777,0.0013408947,0.0011121683,0.0036825445,0.029249474,0.00003160411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035884187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.091780566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035884187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030081074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001857431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07135069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093402298","doi":"","title":"A Citizen's Guide to the Rule of Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Law; Political science; Rule of law; Public law; Private law; Due process; Municipal law; Philosophy of law; Comparative law; Ideal (ethics); Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.017682675739071497,"score_gpt":0.2914910922173161,"score_spread":0.2738084164782446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093402298","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00051184004,0.10082217,0.021402031,0.11889125,0.0099315755,0.00028717678,0.0019526391,0.001046687,0.7451546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015744263,0.12486198,0.03261559,0.0543542,0.0067675607,0.00066279987,0.002066274,0.0013221832,0.76160526],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968881,0.0007934096,0.00025528387,0.00030584028,0.0014493233,0.00030800924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99685043,0.0015563699,0.000103721584,0.0002658275,0.0010366101,0.00018704566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030947968,0.0015626134,0.0012825473,0.0032451877,0.004721035,0.0052210693,0.0021422438,0.0059516053,0.03692024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073960517,0.0011270124,0.00082438317,0.0041756146,0.007327903,0.0070115766,0.0026486763,0.011101029,0.032965876],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006420325,0.000029658984,0.000100666,0.0001420355,0.0000024326173,0.00008467636,0.0010333962,0.0001658485,0.00010702461,0.13917993,0.8033047,0.05584329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015838068,0.0000025940972,0.00005999111,0.00014533024,4.6379512e-7,0.000032979588,0.00013001032,0.000043120606,0.0000099514955,0.013465588,0.98610455,0.000003853934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.077334166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1216345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.077334166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007971303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017140016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15376806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095411060","doi":"10.32920/22056788.v1","title":"Twelve Angry (White) Men: The Constitutionality of the Statement of Principles","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Obligation; Law; Statutory law; Sociology; Racism; Political science; Law and economics; Denial; Supreme court; Psychology","score_opus":0.0817242655275269,"score_gpt":0.33820879213823635,"score_spread":0.2564845266107094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3095411060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20266674,0.00096453755,0.008268547,0.03904129,0.00046148873,0.00020704798,0.00019915064,0.00006938407,0.7481218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86441785,0.00021066648,0.00124983,0.0055538095,0.00007836953,0.00009024992,0.000039200368,0.000030543957,0.12832949],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892484,0.0021834373,0.0002997979,0.0016760213,0.0032802168,0.0033120487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933008,0.002704216,0.0004241513,0.00064853387,0.0018185321,0.0011037621],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009365224,0.00020689242,0.00041781255,0.00044424232,0.017914115,0.006423122,0.0012798815,0.003561832,0.006837399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013226575,0.0006031236,0.00024809735,0.00048456452,0.019078603,0.0019131174,0.00309559,0.006048995,0.00068177347],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038276045,0.000024660607,0.0023502472,0.000026154274,0.0000071008935,0.00031064346,0.025494076,0.0001544842,0.0010028463,0.95050156,0.009578065,0.010511749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010408483,0.000156663,0.016442196,0.00025866213,0.00005828149,0.00024168893,0.023120701,0.0009785556,0.0025847596,0.1391231,0.8167423,0.00018911857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66259086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8362552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66259086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020597097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039181434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67879236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095589026","doi":"10.7256/2454-0706.2020.9.33730","title":"The influence of procedural features of constitutional control on the style of argumentation: a comparative study","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Право и политика","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dissenting opinion; Normative; Procedural justice; Law; Norm (philosophy); Political science; Style (visual arts); Constitution; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04172669897233182,"score_gpt":0.32920533773064153,"score_spread":0.2874786387583097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3095589026","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9676656,0.00036370655,0.0016635954,0.00020990864,0.000013142896,0.000036172398,0.000007636187,0.0000070986393,0.030033013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989907,0.00010819901,0.0003302517,0.000017239878,0.000008601383,0.00001351868,0.0000053288,0.000004784105,0.00052142475],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9819942,0.014202742,0.0005490003,0.00065760204,0.0019921483,0.00060429616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9152644,0.07130396,0.006569143,0.0019113795,0.0034070907,0.0015439157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012790386,0.0002826079,0.00036987232,0.003231512,0.0026340468,0.007879491,0.0008174918,0.0009842564,0.0024391203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051628232,0.00023604646,0.00029004688,0.00217664,0.007601019,0.003487381,0.0019265017,0.0012961581,0.00016989249],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039186768,0.0007478608,0.070971146,0.00031725422,0.00009256985,0.0014863354,0.7852864,0.0004262568,0.0054615955,0.077708095,0.00050587836,0.056604657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012020151,0.0009876599,0.26807532,0.0005889987,0.00016080997,0.0020813164,0.656992,0.0033773181,0.0027638585,0.027760128,0.036944803,0.00014758765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012246788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015498106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012790386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002244418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014172164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06764281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095748209","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3708975","title":"Proximate Causation in Legal HIstoriography","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Proximate and ultimate causation; Historiography; Causation; Law; Political science; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01572380231030005,"score_gpt":0.26129182956052943,"score_spread":0.2455680272502294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3095748209","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3522482,0.039767787,0.07213996,0.09779178,0.0011962261,0.00021601589,0.0012322391,0.00024836723,0.43515942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9802405,0.004967626,0.0021911515,0.0008916606,0.00043257407,0.000042124248,0.00013433199,0.000039142902,0.0110607715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99725455,0.0015352486,0.00012326032,0.0005151822,0.00036936422,0.0002023891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9690535,0.02455665,0.0024579475,0.0018745832,0.0014848753,0.0005724259],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075140903,0.00028364014,0.0005148525,0.0074111545,0.003757332,0.004880732,0.0011018609,0.0025033834,0.021408647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036754336,0.0005609385,0.0002940844,0.007311681,0.012564717,0.0074298773,0.0028134703,0.002520055,0.000942246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011346146,0.00001763941,0.004769486,0.00005727249,0.000014732348,0.00008570947,0.0023959533,0.00029513153,0.000019610927,0.9850154,0.0011153359,0.0062024323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001317745,0.000013613834,0.004419965,0.00014200356,0.000023330907,0.00008272393,0.0026404373,0.0006564381,0.00012382971,0.97750217,0.014374682,0.00000762701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049596536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005737034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021408647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028821495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034315616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071619034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3096895842","doi":"10.7202/1072653ar","title":"The 1938 Holmes Case and Challenging the Statutory Authority of the Commission of Government","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Newfoundland and Labrador Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Dartmouth College; Eli Lilly and Company","keywords":"Statutory law; Commission; Government (linguistics); Law; Public administration; Business; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0493052960621721,"score_gpt":0.30678299595690417,"score_spread":0.25747769989473207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3096895842","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09215738,0.0076272814,0.001520128,0.24455513,0.00067285873,0.000034615176,0.0001696472,0.000021765742,0.65324116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93852526,0.0013625481,0.00034147015,0.028620616,0.00035957378,0.000037764512,0.0000391605,0.000018780707,0.0306949],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9819655,0.0071439226,0.0004365924,0.0011574037,0.003586771,0.0057097664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98809785,0.007550683,0.0014203809,0.0006669027,0.0015775509,0.00068649807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01264786,0.00023013909,0.0003974974,0.0011749035,0.017795235,0.009341851,0.0017811531,0.011799113,0.003968163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026319703,0.00042346772,0.00032952824,0.0018298607,0.03462012,0.004141356,0.0032917655,0.0102765,0.00058037735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021848122,0.000010610297,0.00074466155,0.000012722499,0.000004124876,0.0001723834,0.0041662655,0.00010298039,0.0000518098,0.9718445,0.020552535,0.0023154167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015432796,0.00006446422,0.01705637,0.0010749198,0.000080168975,0.00040525477,0.028856084,0.0006351323,0.0012366511,0.40561935,0.5446494,0.00016784607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4501953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.544313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5498047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037760083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029030774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89514977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3100057134","doi":"10.5539/ilr.v9n1p100","title":"The Impact of Appeals on the Parliamentary Elections in Jordan","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Law Research","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nomination; Appeal; Legislator; Political science; General election; Principle of legality; Transparency (behavior); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Legislation","score_opus":0.17080819681162548,"score_gpt":0.47070011237864573,"score_spread":0.2998919155670202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3100057134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90503895,0.0007004942,0.00022393302,0.0037223673,0.00012422277,0.000054338252,0.000069861315,0.000016047748,0.09004976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99244446,0.00013088576,0.000062261,0.00025854356,0.000078946294,0.0000088952065,0.000026437114,0.0000064437004,0.006983124],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98919535,0.0047979984,0.00034099142,0.00047865455,0.002777495,0.0024094637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9764764,0.011614004,0.003588653,0.00044356042,0.005428972,0.0024483274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009683495,0.00015933644,0.0004916724,0.0017578454,0.005115564,0.0066517824,0.0008464391,0.0013404819,0.014004483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040333226,0.0001824527,0.00036576917,0.0015590058,0.002991503,0.0014574467,0.003476689,0.0023971745,0.0013420021],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030896894,0.0023837558,0.4189148,0.00083259464,0.00023810055,0.008533785,0.08113574,0.005163655,0.003883609,0.22950767,0.03550863,0.21080796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022178798,0.000995447,0.73500055,0.0002522754,0.00015903042,0.00058575004,0.12818219,0.0038831604,0.0017007029,0.024243915,0.104646824,0.00012842935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02513577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03178785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02513577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005096539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004540675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051211774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3100198338","doi":"10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.94","title":"Constitutional and Legal Regulation of State Authority Interaction on Citizen Appeals: Foreign Experience","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Criminology and Sociology","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legalization; Dialectic; State (computer science); Political science; Law; Government (linguistics); Democracy; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.10921446496000822,"score_gpt":0.37320166031873603,"score_spread":0.26398719535872783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3100198338","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83726496,0.00080183905,0.0023176274,0.0040186546,0.00008306002,0.000014210787,0.000012911889,0.000025182271,0.15546162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972716,0.000109558816,0.000055907505,0.00015658414,0.000010745127,0.0000026609148,0.0000024748394,0.0000075656667,0.0023829087],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955721,0.0031183762,0.00008468524,0.00023164965,0.00039696853,0.00059615145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965557,0.0024013517,0.00031128834,0.00022521253,0.00021286812,0.00029362494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004159932,0.00018280795,0.00038922633,0.00093654013,0.008575896,0.008202122,0.0005639002,0.0023163788,0.005812598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008401334,0.0002285374,0.00030469144,0.0008095457,0.019068211,0.0058308984,0.005689218,0.00407931,0.00034545848],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051268467,0.00006871637,0.0026913208,0.000028182882,0.0000050169197,0.0010985143,0.8639481,0.00017739016,0.0008262971,0.12521547,0.00087947136,0.005010178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025980187,0.00015363912,0.006144612,0.00017932261,0.000017777726,0.0014266087,0.82463527,0.0009688425,0.0010964882,0.03023955,0.13505715,0.00005480585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008686754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061994465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008686754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002848624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020076786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022000074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3102915395","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: The Law of Canada: Secondary Sources","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.11466412897941308,"score_gpt":0.3690039311192978,"score_spread":0.2543398021398847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3102915395","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032518487,0.004211176,0.0020019363,0.0050920914,0.00038508396,0.0030287984,0.7214918,0.0011081932,0.259429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03048394,0.011789525,0.014464733,0.002403523,0.00033521626,0.008149051,0.2445677,0.0015529045,0.68625337],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99540836,0.00041373735,0.0004009682,0.00037982388,0.0027994667,0.00059761637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9662771,0.0058937147,0.00083148194,0.0010397828,0.024609862,0.001348187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005043545,0.000953773,0.0010392829,0.023129335,0.0069700144,0.007710937,0.002274918,0.0020033675,0.20914926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025472235,0.0010504713,0.00052286737,0.05199527,0.0014650619,0.002077913,0.0017043039,0.0017235932,0.028557291],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029077079,0.000029873465,0.000810936,0.0008400438,0.000005739097,0.000031515403,0.0009048258,0.00014421906,0.000078959085,0.0077328933,0.95789397,0.031497978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004520906,0.000009951384,0.009485083,0.0010576472,0.000020394391,0.000018187335,0.001566786,0.00014357781,0.00034559923,0.0019756667,0.985299,0.00003289641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96409976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9868895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20914926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043402843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20651813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69967395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3106304731","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0066","title":"Notwithstanding rights, review, or remedy? On the notwithstanding clause and the operation of legislation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Law; Constitution; Charter; Legislature; Fundamental rights; Bill of rights; Law and economics; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.04378781811301545,"score_gpt":0.26094789933883056,"score_spread":0.2171600812258151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3106304731","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028901108,0.023727214,0.013028962,0.3223403,0.002415347,0.00013156349,0.000112102694,0.000096727264,0.6092467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79834646,0.00918619,0.0037516714,0.08700168,0.0039013408,0.00020297115,0.000086826854,0.000122058766,0.09740084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872759,0.0050612865,0.0004966145,0.0019032487,0.0030459038,0.0022170425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98881793,0.00677565,0.0009907732,0.0015459439,0.0014352199,0.00043454985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0151191,0.00030272422,0.0007135777,0.0010267211,0.005837409,0.015445588,0.0019995386,0.012939953,0.005054799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02553224,0.00040768425,0.0006147845,0.0012268738,0.060060825,0.013723456,0.0030878668,0.008696593,0.00093193114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024644876,0.0000019924485,0.000037715865,0.0000064169,7.385957e-7,0.000014546908,0.0008061706,0.000016034624,0.00002889295,0.9957557,0.0023121813,0.0010171862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040473835,0.000044023687,0.0011807181,0.0005119862,0.000025471014,0.000106217616,0.0037923516,0.00032765995,0.00045184352,0.6738276,0.31964162,0.00005002057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049175028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041171227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049175028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0121344505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018632218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.097777605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W310680922","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i1.4563","title":"Reimagining Haj Khalil v. Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science; Geography; Medicine; History","score_opus":0.04375297097071363,"score_gpt":0.3320573126985284,"score_spread":0.2883043417278148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W310680922","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20921701,0.010368406,0.0020037757,0.19141814,0.0008706623,0.0000931361,0.0004086889,0.000071000446,0.5855492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9157248,0.002879972,0.000508146,0.018310843,0.00011455524,0.000016316952,0.00005563152,0.000031773245,0.062357925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99426264,0.00054466305,0.0000826114,0.00041863325,0.002172542,0.0025188723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967919,0.0012523781,0.000163343,0.000108607834,0.001141988,0.00054165407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003297076,0.00028323507,0.00037916435,0.0011445169,0.036433864,0.009739903,0.0019213303,0.0057031834,0.004554963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067497706,0.000391168,0.00035632207,0.0014973867,0.013559355,0.0029784404,0.0038863313,0.007114129,0.00025310184],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032949247,0.000021198963,0.0035739648,0.000074157666,0.000017290346,0.0012288541,0.053368106,0.0003009022,0.00041071148,0.8759319,0.045448896,0.019591175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029055847,0.000042413838,0.016556708,0.0004469397,0.00009772618,0.00039808924,0.0723318,0.0009682392,0.0014796609,0.07264975,0.8348083,0.00019131193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98970896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9956593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.110551305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.110551305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18057741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8021096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107770851","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2020-0056","title":"A unified model of public law: Charter values and reasonableness review in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Administrative law; Proportionality (law); Jurisprudence; Law; Normative; Judicial review; Political science; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.040249437279116576,"score_gpt":0.2285426591580825,"score_spread":0.1882932218789659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107770851","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0669076,0.022549305,0.040594645,0.22764336,0.0007895757,0.00041430883,0.0010013665,0.00028256077,0.6398173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9490793,0.00482158,0.013751065,0.006087572,0.00015791795,0.00014104253,0.00018806879,0.000071881695,0.025701601],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9840259,0.0040917187,0.0005040636,0.0015138017,0.0066053118,0.0032591894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9827293,0.005193664,0.00078410766,0.001134309,0.008213892,0.0019447164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012573631,0.00039329633,0.00097051216,0.0055367895,0.015413983,0.019876305,0.0028576753,0.0047351667,0.0035676549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027937986,0.00063390366,0.00076614413,0.0066159787,0.027067231,0.006820343,0.0035963575,0.006541515,0.00027322109],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004624261,0.000004582944,0.00032897922,0.00001673769,0.0000038116136,0.00004003016,0.0011699788,0.00086434523,0.000021337917,0.99033207,0.00403427,0.003179289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047648475,0.000021467818,0.0046668663,0.00038449513,0.000045482062,0.00006681733,0.00414537,0.009524599,0.00025126073,0.7858867,0.19482218,0.00013714368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98461574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9856483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70658386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.29341617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35890236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8195371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3109893383","doi":"10.4337/9781789906516.00022","title":"The comparative institutional analysis of parliamentary ethics","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Democracy; Law; Transparency (behavior); Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.11492235441473142,"score_gpt":0.3271842325883522,"score_spread":0.2122618781736208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3109893383","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056698088,0.0045491853,0.009759135,0.0062734345,0.00015469744,0.000056444464,0.00014455736,0.000030419667,0.9223341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98024243,0.0019178021,0.0022356983,0.0004373406,0.00010994935,0.00010155802,0.00010359683,0.000034837336,0.014816774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9847912,0.011317037,0.00028147263,0.0006929072,0.0017270356,0.0011902933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898274,0.005762142,0.0012536375,0.0012932165,0.0013728145,0.00049084437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006397862,0.0002020098,0.00031825216,0.0038913575,0.0045764833,0.0077395434,0.0011119636,0.0013646822,0.011155685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015374419,0.00017832486,0.00032556307,0.0053297225,0.01596026,0.0055693355,0.004124507,0.0016167053,0.00077503157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004881978,0.000005059403,0.0002463272,0.000019397226,0.000002935385,0.000021895601,0.0014088467,0.00012011408,0.000017683387,0.99487054,0.0006432628,0.0026390217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020495463,0.000041298263,0.0075497185,0.00055452,0.000023252906,0.00017235301,0.01816023,0.0013126133,0.00036904702,0.64165026,0.33012342,0.000022842658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005286963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045577637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0121238185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0121238185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047482657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08796489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111648035","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0039","title":"Private law rights as democratic participation: Kelsen on private law and (economic) democracy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Private law; Law; Public law; Ideology; Political science; Comparative law; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Politics; Law and economics","score_opus":0.02063517685177603,"score_gpt":0.25169710591330874,"score_spread":0.23106192906153272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111648035","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045645643,0.03590591,0.032662354,0.22535668,0.0013763838,0.0000579611,0.00009690047,0.000061968705,0.65883625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9127263,0.011655757,0.0040567694,0.01921215,0.0013702438,0.0001203231,0.000044452096,0.000086259715,0.05072771],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99583983,0.0022530663,0.00010026092,0.0005202076,0.000786211,0.0005003938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99562293,0.003407921,0.00026891968,0.00029466007,0.00026686562,0.00013875909],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051236777,0.00046396643,0.0004549675,0.0014594586,0.0044382927,0.008123537,0.00089140824,0.00511119,0.005569996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006273552,0.0002722392,0.00043888733,0.0018992625,0.041343898,0.017816234,0.005723885,0.007154079,0.00073666085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018029234,0.000002790793,0.000017114407,0.000005271742,4.1007863e-7,0.000007267369,0.0008514451,0.000050163067,0.000008354692,0.9976338,0.0006902245,0.00073140056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048530965,0.000004411186,0.000060304443,0.00006548314,0.0000010052057,0.000011456816,0.0005487492,0.0001682055,0.000038472208,0.96565783,0.03343363,0.0000055276464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005337147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004750682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008123537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065015247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035764922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04717207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112240481","doi":"10.22459/acni.2023.04","title":"Building National Identity through the Constitution: The Canadian Charter Experience","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"ANU Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitution; Identity (music); Political science; Law; Public administration; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.1405518457205271,"score_gpt":0.35044220264207343,"score_spread":0.20989035692154634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112240481","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028979827,0.0064059584,0.0010352622,0.088873655,0.00055478583,0.00003254537,0.00017070127,0.000047551355,0.8738998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7840717,0.0074655125,0.0014673328,0.014316132,0.00015457324,0.000052245712,0.00014117555,0.00010939101,0.19222195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995263,0.0008515869,0.000056050256,0.00029171217,0.0017088219,0.0018288261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970305,0.000799519,0.000075011296,0.00012125777,0.001207015,0.00076672144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034363626,0.0003257506,0.0004854216,0.0014499486,0.043574996,0.016803412,0.0015462318,0.003819747,0.008612983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052080806,0.00029986582,0.00029088653,0.0035011887,0.02508321,0.0046968427,0.00362768,0.0063182074,0.00065465167],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007993356,0.0000103568655,0.0006115731,0.000024356643,0.0000026002774,0.00013554115,0.028238887,0.00016886074,0.00005990342,0.8992425,0.060602818,0.010894581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008660661,0.000006374318,0.0019462862,0.00016292543,0.000009812616,0.000072329996,0.04063355,0.00023854914,0.00012315369,0.039504945,0.9172558,0.000037747846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.993109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99655366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16376859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16376859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25512752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9699099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112428326","doi":"","title":"When Is Executive Lawmaking Constitutional in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lawmaking; Delegation; Discretion; Supreme court; Legislature; Political science; Separation of powers; Law; Constitutional law; Judicial review; Executive order; Constitutional review; Law and economics; Administrative law; Delegate; Constitution; Economics","score_opus":0.01947843635760517,"score_gpt":0.25509633427455614,"score_spread":0.23561789791695098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112428326","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3377126,0.0065497877,0.0019667097,0.099849544,0.00038577907,0.00011654759,0.00079684757,0.00009473408,0.5525275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9769329,0.001423987,0.00045133854,0.00567158,0.00007227686,0.00002496383,0.00011948816,0.000028984437,0.015274353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98120785,0.0010507589,0.00041080595,0.0015372745,0.0053385915,0.010454717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98154193,0.0051559787,0.0011192665,0.0007000267,0.007503594,0.003979225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008428278,0.00022651232,0.00086814276,0.0023151438,0.023655714,0.014977593,0.0026378918,0.004236511,0.009267769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032533836,0.00057270704,0.0005418579,0.0033129249,0.01650947,0.0044851727,0.0034584454,0.0064958595,0.00052231917],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012546332,0.000047594534,0.014944377,0.00011699599,0.000052504794,0.00056898815,0.0162299,0.0012100317,0.0009396635,0.9071342,0.02834967,0.030280674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024351565,0.00009496921,0.13768496,0.0013933177,0.00019036955,0.00039203747,0.0753805,0.0024743387,0.002450231,0.16120322,0.6180314,0.00046121556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9914424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9959329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16306601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16306601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27032822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9707248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112479627","doi":"","title":"Court-Packing in 2021: Pathways to Democratic Legitimacy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Legitimacy; Law; Presidential system; Separation of powers; Populism; Aside; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Judicial review; Politics","score_opus":0.038297679505695355,"score_gpt":0.2836243771021592,"score_spread":0.24532669759646386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112479627","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25266957,0.00087995024,0.013534795,0.028680341,0.00022816524,0.00007256157,0.00007985123,0.000097482975,0.7037573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919063,0.00012322393,0.00071031594,0.0011423838,0.000060651,0.00002853294,0.000025809242,0.000019898582,0.005982892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99037886,0.0036604581,0.00030129278,0.0011792153,0.0020070206,0.0024731196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98872524,0.0054773344,0.0014983055,0.0017130567,0.0012922854,0.0012937367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009406833,0.00026463292,0.00047026103,0.001681859,0.011145554,0.014350143,0.0012742548,0.005710305,0.0075947954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026382798,0.00049315894,0.00044047085,0.0015056632,0.022651833,0.0127622625,0.010994386,0.009985191,0.0008528064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018428316,0.0000223278,0.0007680981,0.0000093802455,0.0000021457358,0.00007684722,0.0048890407,0.00015525015,0.00015237357,0.9883221,0.0008612425,0.004722736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042476637,0.000055319044,0.0032618465,0.00008189109,0.000007785045,0.00015863909,0.007633322,0.0007867729,0.0010337916,0.9230325,0.06386354,0.000042120886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041634655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005741399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014350143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058977352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006856209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04974872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112527949","doi":"10.7202/1078557ar","title":"Le droit européen des droits de la personne et la Cour suprême du Canada : une perspective canadienne","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009259665916658057,"score_gpt":0.24863151720800214,"score_spread":0.23937185129134408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112527949","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045412384,0.072454855,0.0028480121,0.102149025,0.0008383251,0.00003365608,0.00038494612,0.000038328246,0.77584046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7961219,0.03547698,0.0013629744,0.012931787,0.00038081853,0.000050103525,0.00012709196,0.000054832664,0.15349345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772674,0.00046140168,0.000035211204,0.00027061827,0.00064254034,0.00086350687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989411,0.00033193844,0.00006190108,0.000039673665,0.0003928542,0.00023251737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012728949,0.0005487373,0.0004876305,0.0026429987,0.015981385,0.013470227,0.0014245632,0.0035897882,0.0065720775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021510536,0.00023801283,0.00034860976,0.004016213,0.022772925,0.0036001238,0.002072121,0.0049726674,0.0003533355],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060946936,0.0000051858256,0.00036347,0.000027440055,0.0000039242746,0.00007260985,0.0076762084,0.00017987675,0.0000568034,0.9806928,0.00688555,0.004030101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013270813,0.000013745951,0.006235537,0.0007100886,0.00003104198,0.00011629842,0.033428464,0.000587601,0.00026558465,0.15325941,0.80526924,0.000069751266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9851223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9886445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11518054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11518054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11370456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8356972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114618888","doi":"","title":"Judicial Independence and Judicial Place of Residence: A Tale of Two (or more) Cities?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial independence; Law; Judicial discretion; Political science; Prerogative; Judicial review; Judicial activism; Separation of powers; Veto; Independence (probability theory); Supreme court; Democracy; Constitutional law; Legislature; Politics","score_opus":0.05417441884891131,"score_gpt":0.3242715104905331,"score_spread":0.27009709164162177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3114618888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14019366,0.024230653,0.0044366946,0.19443427,0.000990628,0.000043746026,0.00022209689,0.000044974062,0.63540334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95663947,0.005617899,0.00081733667,0.0075472645,0.00035220876,0.000016869591,0.00005856268,0.000032035274,0.028918298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952171,0.00088443817,0.000104324194,0.0005308378,0.0010292551,0.0022340305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995773,0.00094497023,0.0004937749,0.0003727511,0.001183196,0.0012322443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029515463,0.0002761042,0.00057427253,0.0022604698,0.017754976,0.014587349,0.001791762,0.0025481042,0.006313667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007160286,0.0003335305,0.00046120095,0.0035842152,0.04527092,0.007654004,0.0061598513,0.005907484,0.00049200625],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001723579,0.000010659797,0.0016527915,0.0000267883,0.0000069994644,0.00009167834,0.0051555797,0.00008874243,0.00007381202,0.9790647,0.004790358,0.009020658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011541507,0.00006696282,0.044967018,0.0007546124,0.00009172629,0.00041396893,0.05905843,0.00068664586,0.00055412174,0.37713805,0.5159699,0.00018315967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7385897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8335337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2614103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0345151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053079136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5258995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114829951","doi":"10.4000/revus.6662","title":"Post-sovereign constitution-making and stages of representation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revus","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Sovereignty; Representation (politics); Democracy; Epistemology; Dimension (graph theory); Sociology; Sequence (biology); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Mathematics; Philosophy; Politics; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.0515394455113315,"score_gpt":0.3340113038505772,"score_spread":0.2824718583392457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3114829951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15941875,0.0019191231,0.08932094,0.008417706,0.00015966885,0.00018980794,0.000061380786,0.000075802454,0.74043685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797023,0.00024100658,0.005060396,0.00022493802,0.000021233116,0.000075962394,0.000019403069,0.000023920324,0.014630808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99064726,0.0056185783,0.00024643203,0.00090473966,0.0012953545,0.0012875878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99410015,0.0033410147,0.00056049845,0.0010432032,0.00062345044,0.0003315642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010067217,0.00021147948,0.0003081873,0.0012290628,0.005961199,0.007670044,0.0011252816,0.0025906921,0.0051202253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011807271,0.00038505046,0.0005664974,0.0013647121,0.025545876,0.010998648,0.0062099965,0.0045747245,0.0004565726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003848578,0.0000031261548,0.00006390674,0.0000035670669,8.214721e-7,0.000013793492,0.002379272,0.00008672876,0.000041899555,0.99622595,0.00009855174,0.0010786937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014123131,0.000030026598,0.000756396,0.000069237816,0.0000046140644,0.00006127973,0.0041093156,0.0007081764,0.0005014499,0.943048,0.050681368,0.000016022876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036262465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004172233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010067217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005887738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004637433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053241134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114913787","doi":"","title":"Alex M. Cameron, Power Without Law. The Supreme Courtof Canada, .the Marshall Decisions, and the Failure ofJudicial Activism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.012217173374166387,"score_gpt":0.252947511472747,"score_spread":0.24073033809858063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3114913787","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012576167,0.18021113,0.0013601787,0.6537638,0.0023615374,0.000058413953,0.0007108584,0.0000407324,0.1489172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5987013,0.109166026,0.002567738,0.13526616,0.0030046878,0.0001379395,0.00026461648,0.00012684782,0.15076473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978543,0.00054017716,0.00008034087,0.0002214571,0.00079694716,0.00050671684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942364,0.003780514,0.00030063273,0.0001393954,0.0011727212,0.00037023044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039382833,0.0004908426,0.0004148649,0.0014394288,0.017280828,0.00691737,0.002164297,0.011286631,0.0135183055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0106282355,0.00059508736,0.00029348585,0.0026569623,0.013268611,0.005876724,0.0016765543,0.009165607,0.00110679],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051375227,0.00003558699,0.0018269152,0.00012776756,0.000015373242,0.00022273157,0.0051833363,0.00023385117,0.0001720199,0.5675733,0.41190088,0.012656827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073542076,0.000020743139,0.015333107,0.00105806,0.000042428783,0.00015109497,0.0122609995,0.00044000964,0.00066138024,0.2379321,0.7318932,0.00013336232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80345756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.938346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19654244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022486718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020892534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3953998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114989545","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3483299","title":"Not Just the Luck of the Draw? Exploring Competency of Counsel in Federal Court Refugee Leave Determinations (2005-2010)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Toronto; Royal Ontario Museum; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Refugee; Law; Political science; Criminology; Psychology; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03101338471336539,"score_gpt":0.27972215918150484,"score_spread":0.24870877446813944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3114989545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9380645,0.0012695533,0.00047854098,0.025502803,0.00008230173,0.000052747957,0.00019071615,0.000008793439,0.034350034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899149,0.00022420942,0.00015846877,0.0027616064,0.000014973353,0.000026718917,0.00006640993,0.000005779319,0.0068269568],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886468,0.0032801842,0.0004185764,0.0007261565,0.0025716536,0.004356572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9746129,0.013782111,0.0028060707,0.0006531002,0.0049050185,0.0032408817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016957045,0.00011879987,0.00037732735,0.001465034,0.009978905,0.0062473333,0.0022429319,0.003068076,0.003131269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07523804,0.00034870263,0.0002766317,0.0014524672,0.0034388572,0.0049804496,0.006318225,0.0067485557,0.0004191755],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003838206,0.00069964514,0.37404215,0.00020520446,0.000086383894,0.001623202,0.35843107,0.001210085,0.0010874694,0.08924509,0.04198628,0.13099964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003474045,0.00029176727,0.4666924,0.00095687323,0.000101726655,0.00058621436,0.42722455,0.00092745427,0.0019116846,0.008541795,0.09265175,0.00007908107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33411363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6713931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6658864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017397039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038633965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66433775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3117282740","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3754588","title":"Justice(s) Out of Office: Principles for Former Judges","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; Kelowna General Hospital; Thompson Rivers University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.06745637639631191,"score_gpt":0.33107349313314816,"score_spread":0.26361711673683624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3117282740","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055854358,0.0022062839,0.049961623,0.24199188,0.004639866,0.00095838425,0.00030236944,0.00024016915,0.6438451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7849275,0.0007743576,0.020854674,0.049724087,0.0026347397,0.0012587146,0.000100085526,0.00028569147,0.13944012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.957656,0.009927049,0.0019549234,0.0065161474,0.012170573,0.011775403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9669316,0.01566774,0.0015579555,0.0028904276,0.0073369173,0.0056154695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037009344,0.0006480486,0.0015900945,0.0017485665,0.039768048,0.024951372,0.0065090624,0.02765874,0.007251843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07564862,0.0013033361,0.0012986659,0.0013966311,0.029741403,0.010163886,0.007222626,0.03507057,0.0028048868],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017036393,0.000052327818,0.0004899515,0.00002561354,0.0000060393877,0.0001495428,0.007822973,0.00010819922,0.0001514827,0.9482134,0.035955485,0.0070078676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010624072,0.00009606739,0.0020101536,0.000327961,0.00004849492,0.0003243954,0.009412874,0.0006714293,0.0008323408,0.78868634,0.19738506,0.000098721335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02540355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07534762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039768048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006238148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039302398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19572645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3119060674","doi":"","title":"Canada’s Unwritten Constitutional Order: Conventions and Structural Analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Normative; Order (exchange); Law; Political science; State (computer science); Power (physics); Law and economics; Constitutional law; Constitutional economics; Constitutional theory; Sociology; Computer science; Economics; Physics","score_opus":0.034959858699764784,"score_gpt":0.27914292417899644,"score_spread":0.24418306547923166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3119060674","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10862947,0.003955688,0.03517944,0.03537773,0.00019586856,0.0002445897,0.0012185213,0.00016731746,0.8150314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9690633,0.0012514176,0.011044264,0.001039819,0.000055853045,0.00007749481,0.0002834375,0.00005351644,0.017131027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98679996,0.0020247374,0.00027990234,0.0011532117,0.007730525,0.0020116924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98617965,0.0043160054,0.0009732834,0.0015367253,0.0062087444,0.0007855579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059539946,0.00027919817,0.000461984,0.0055042394,0.012417444,0.010635318,0.0018479966,0.001275579,0.0036260034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025240881,0.00031966862,0.00039100493,0.0064760684,0.021818835,0.0026815876,0.0020364919,0.003247803,0.0001752125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021309268,0.0000019046677,0.00065712637,0.000011074599,0.000003589465,0.000017985774,0.0014666227,0.000493375,0.000046009038,0.99132955,0.0013688972,0.0046018497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028930797,0.000016166085,0.01950611,0.0003176227,0.000057436417,0.00006302336,0.0051712357,0.0057803327,0.0006375291,0.7482641,0.22003655,0.00012094572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96826875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9802742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88300264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11699739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19086695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84887946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3119233148","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3699740","title":"‘A Constitution Similar in Principle to that of the United Kingdom’: The Preamble, Constitutional Principles, and a Sustainable Jurisprudence","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Preamble; Constitution; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Kingdom; Engineering; Biology","score_opus":0.04376646627950409,"score_gpt":0.30076562198947965,"score_spread":0.25699915570997556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3119233148","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054395765,0.015574879,0.021397453,0.2613881,0.0042254077,0.00017222161,0.00048922794,0.00009807428,0.64225894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8462356,0.001849661,0.016713234,0.061335538,0.00083845493,0.00043015683,0.0002836766,0.00013784546,0.07217593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99182534,0.0037105458,0.00057518634,0.0012192406,0.0011642121,0.0015053636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99663585,0.0016869132,0.0002843562,0.0006196109,0.0005951187,0.00017826387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008423227,0.0004139196,0.00086636515,0.0010633862,0.008368989,0.008678557,0.0020360956,0.016658328,0.0034925004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0146372495,0.00069807866,0.0007048055,0.0011518982,0.018212806,0.0065544304,0.0044193706,0.011552626,0.0008730727],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005595978,0.000003560957,0.00004722708,0.000012139389,0.0000020090454,0.000037281035,0.0012970293,0.000048692127,0.000067828485,0.99131715,0.0060452307,0.0011162988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060658673,0.00002774033,0.0014545231,0.00027691945,0.000019076342,0.00024544424,0.0030999111,0.00029224934,0.0005337829,0.58487076,0.40904474,0.000074252835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04550928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07343612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04550928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005528064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009887097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09048879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3119648700","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3569","title":"Whipping Up a Storm: Trying to Make Sense of Constitutional Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Law; Supreme court; Politics; Democratic legitimacy; Political science; Fidelity; Law and economics; Democracy; Constraint (computer-aided design); Sociology; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.06578480201170718,"score_gpt":0.30457141331327964,"score_spread":0.23878661130157247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3119648700","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044579744,0.15678826,0.07252039,0.36522782,0.004338825,0.00009975791,0.0000687759,0.00017623446,0.35620016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9156433,0.032883503,0.01176704,0.029010624,0.0017593865,0.0001318682,0.000054484983,0.00018486059,0.008564917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97021896,0.021576796,0.0010401867,0.0017034041,0.0039666817,0.0014939877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98160607,0.013841404,0.00077633385,0.0020990362,0.0011640522,0.0005131772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032995995,0.0005756708,0.0010475821,0.0035145415,0.009379321,0.022583902,0.0032261317,0.0072341985,0.0014676193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03683004,0.00066494173,0.000718386,0.0024994202,0.1105081,0.034622543,0.009349475,0.013353427,0.00046105793],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037029629,0.0000039586907,0.00008111803,0.000053458185,0.0000052132823,0.00003894332,0.011621562,0.00009030749,0.000051772204,0.97837436,0.002890869,0.006784718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066901116,0.0000064347496,0.00009945499,0.00028370298,0.000004816262,0.00002629067,0.0080607,0.00013859227,0.00007954048,0.94194543,0.049340013,0.000008499882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006604303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068145283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032995995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006689847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0128858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1745016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3119731913","doi":"10.4324/9780203126653-10","title":"The Canadian Charter, substantive equality and social rights","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Social equality; Social rights; Sociology; Law; Human rights","score_opus":0.0650157245723419,"score_gpt":0.29322477872038555,"score_spread":0.22820905414804366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3119731913","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013568387,0.020221043,0.0025206073,0.027070748,0.001292849,0.00006503032,0.0003861317,0.0000631057,0.9470236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11422459,0.017307404,0.0042768647,0.012842475,0.0009194209,0.0001505261,0.0002929172,0.0001787298,0.8498071],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971106,0.0003785584,0.00005046319,0.00024738265,0.0016508818,0.0005620154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984648,0.0005263225,0.00004380269,0.000104154526,0.00071299163,0.00014795495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023672814,0.0008019422,0.00062306965,0.00290706,0.013487531,0.010106928,0.0020295088,0.0050696675,0.018826518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005374008,0.00060013245,0.0003001255,0.0047634863,0.018844156,0.0037259685,0.0012954898,0.0068661347,0.0016214495],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021259082,0.000002972259,0.00002850288,0.000020276286,8.4351757e-7,0.000009499207,0.0006242513,0.00006921542,0.00001941116,0.90231085,0.09102818,0.005883897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008329166,0.0000028977656,0.00058806007,0.0002047949,0.0000057516672,0.000023530816,0.0009461203,0.00018320882,0.00007811655,0.21111737,0.7868203,0.000021490576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96873367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9864802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07991455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07991455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14841281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5798234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121173077","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004689","title":"A Reply to Critics of <i>Constitutional Goods</i>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Constitutional law; Politics; Art history; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Classics; Art","score_opus":0.026748426982610384,"score_gpt":0.3073624706739275,"score_spread":0.28061404369131715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121173077","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003133577,0.0016341538,0.00020546737,0.99004364,0.0039281584,0.0000019097365,0.0000108363,0.000011902198,0.0038506307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.034432836,0.0032268886,0.00051398313,0.93314916,0.02024198,0.000028824303,0.000027841032,0.00018882875,0.008189735],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9765128,0.009866131,0.0010785187,0.0027483348,0.008101057,0.001693163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9142985,0.06580231,0.0031257193,0.0027228917,0.011374178,0.002676475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02696235,0.0009664319,0.0016047079,0.002199934,0.012844893,0.016856851,0.005504477,0.04374275,0.0072949734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09185931,0.0008955836,0.0013780791,0.004306438,0.044108674,0.022388967,0.008989319,0.063296996,0.0020808666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022398453,0.000009443012,0.00024619687,0.00010619813,0.000012789095,0.00015313136,0.005839847,0.00011056462,0.000060062113,0.18449569,0.8042299,0.0047136955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036990106,0.00001908376,0.0005605128,0.00069436926,0.00002162599,0.00025311054,0.012418491,0.00029985415,0.00025545454,0.1050225,0.88033384,0.00008415863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016594812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01991285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98836505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011634962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009825981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14259225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121227752","doi":"10.25192/issn.1982-0496.rdfd.v25i31874","title":"CANADIAN LIVING TREE DOCTRINE OF CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Direitos Fundamentais & Democracia","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Constitution; Doctrine; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional interpretation; Metaphor; Constitutional law; Law; Objectivity (philosophy); Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.02341220341272064,"score_gpt":0.2873373079858172,"score_spread":0.26392510457309654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121227752","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011590092,0.0015834422,0.014161333,0.010925797,0.00033473328,0.00004658751,0.00029352392,0.00009240642,0.96097213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88369405,0.0024849044,0.013089683,0.0032407164,0.00028852938,0.00009444113,0.0002725569,0.000098976285,0.09673617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940071,0.0007997813,0.00014906508,0.00083919783,0.0031276476,0.0010772102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976699,0.0006149361,0.00010679706,0.00023149222,0.0011662267,0.00021058881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026594312,0.00040955847,0.0004667898,0.0023336567,0.012625811,0.0066679204,0.0018383887,0.002474076,0.00870821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005557839,0.00028697937,0.00053836644,0.0031229774,0.019914223,0.002694127,0.0026847927,0.0048263217,0.000711127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.276134e-7,4.1616283e-7,0.000031031628,0.0000043932696,6.5833746e-7,0.000011650373,0.00031975075,0.00006676476,0.00002222244,0.99742943,0.0009944625,0.0011182141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022102786,0.000007675118,0.0013660843,0.000115462724,0.000025590043,0.000117285366,0.001149515,0.0015644089,0.000300664,0.66415936,0.33111417,0.000057798323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8847938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91742986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11520618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050115373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06607152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3636142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121255575","doi":"","title":"The Increasing Irrelevance of Section 1 of the Charter","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Deference; Adjudication; Law; Political science; Section (typography); Standard of review; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Sociology; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.0486803144265786,"score_gpt":0.30907395060998705,"score_spread":0.26039363618340844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121255575","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40550584,0.006002789,0.015904745,0.074519046,0.0012449418,0.00008963982,0.00019814134,0.00019764819,0.49633726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9738931,0.0010421557,0.0012278862,0.0070464117,0.0003570311,0.000016665268,0.00005647409,0.000031625696,0.016328584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9769936,0.0030631225,0.00059150567,0.0032735763,0.012755547,0.0033225694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94592196,0.028489783,0.008267806,0.0031585789,0.012905382,0.0012566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01917345,0.00028310766,0.0006673104,0.0018883556,0.008068675,0.01097276,0.0021481416,0.0037789447,0.0035455478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055774476,0.00043145995,0.0005476622,0.00168686,0.024265042,0.0048364648,0.003699981,0.009636955,0.00028107283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020781868,0.000013117651,0.0043266774,0.00004865291,0.000010704405,0.00020763435,0.0066674394,0.00043636275,0.0005710906,0.96432334,0.0052261786,0.01814818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006646477,0.00036834323,0.08169075,0.000867421,0.00013762143,0.00096893485,0.013284428,0.0026433624,0.006700753,0.42215672,0.47075245,0.00036271315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35309708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45339328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9718561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02814387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02728364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70208365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121267013","doi":"","title":"Law's Expression: The Promise and Perils of Judicial Opinion Writing in Canadian Constitutional Law","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Supreme court; Charter; Democracy; Judicial opinion; Expression (computer science); Judicial review; Function (biology); Constitutional law; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.02037336622644928,"score_gpt":0.2779223015099664,"score_spread":0.2575489352835171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121267013","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20772794,0.002988182,0.010306668,0.13895746,0.0006352972,0.00007198377,0.00017121425,0.00013400114,0.63900733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98488784,0.00051078555,0.0016343939,0.0021385297,0.0001074052,0.00002001306,0.000019845807,0.00003757455,0.010643459],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872033,0.003838092,0.00031601888,0.00092732476,0.005129708,0.0025855869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98314375,0.008228503,0.0009509318,0.0010466033,0.005126814,0.0015034481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013365878,0.0003563044,0.0004248208,0.0028719886,0.029849842,0.02352932,0.0028504313,0.0040836963,0.0040676836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04904712,0.0006645078,0.00038745932,0.0035899794,0.04569192,0.0076078633,0.0054894253,0.008716092,0.00025534484],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020970827,0.000011063028,0.0011872458,0.000019862298,0.000004137655,0.00009620296,0.06946962,0.00026514908,0.00023444308,0.9038054,0.004868522,0.02001738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067749155,0.000054343363,0.01677006,0.0003886007,0.00007857293,0.00020940475,0.108176336,0.004802591,0.0016169954,0.53272766,0.3348571,0.00025055563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93871385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9567151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09639744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09639744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11427296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6994156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121292853","doi":"","title":"Charter Dialogue Revisited – Or Much Ado About Metaphors","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Phenomenon; Legislature; Supreme court; Legislation; Law; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03810004463575508,"score_gpt":0.31614191547791215,"score_spread":0.2780418708421571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121292853","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036114063,0.035450205,0.04603836,0.22076762,0.0063647036,0.000056610137,0.00016803609,0.0002098391,0.6548306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9402691,0.0060894983,0.0052986504,0.016302101,0.0029040372,0.0000992056,0.000073251475,0.00022370745,0.028740583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.988792,0.008167722,0.00014885001,0.0007488251,0.001523153,0.0006193815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939865,0.0043722615,0.00041177,0.00046076707,0.00055308104,0.00021558967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060336017,0.0007509721,0.0007318489,0.0030209967,0.0073521715,0.010999452,0.0018510805,0.005639665,0.0058176233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0106496615,0.00026396188,0.0005188746,0.0027270697,0.049551684,0.019967798,0.0039029913,0.009459423,0.0007176337],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055753353,0.0000029684006,0.000020021145,0.000020905005,9.514733e-7,0.000032011558,0.010729172,0.000031263895,0.00003851746,0.9845212,0.0028493984,0.0017479584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019959021,0.000019283465,0.00016890166,0.00024304898,0.000005846865,0.00022148603,0.023737555,0.0004068541,0.00023442831,0.55927914,0.41564196,0.000021512093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007819014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058751446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010999452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01018426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037146304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073892295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121365754","doi":"","title":"Interventions at the Supreme Court of Canada: Accuracy, Affiliation, and Acceptance","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Appeal; Intervention (counseling); Law; Psychological intervention; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Parliament; Sociology; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.022249018008963086,"score_gpt":0.27074030754786554,"score_spread":0.24849128953890245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121365754","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59838253,0.00845017,0.0026097852,0.2144042,0.0005895912,0.00034322697,0.00048073282,0.0000723719,0.17466746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863435,0.0008899956,0.00032468583,0.008828941,0.00013175176,0.000051459254,0.00005312486,0.000012407547,0.0033641346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.92666656,0.023853097,0.0016462422,0.0044700685,0.029099656,0.0142643815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81984484,0.09973418,0.020997623,0.0048120706,0.034349,0.020262305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04171538,0.000311058,0.0009238449,0.0019382725,0.021549929,0.012130559,0.0039290814,0.007947917,0.0070481366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23339766,0.0005270331,0.00048213959,0.003256287,0.017787395,0.004172651,0.0064833383,0.0107474495,0.0005415497],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001030418,0.0007705593,0.2841289,0.00068360934,0.0004495818,0.0014711586,0.13220893,0.0027179867,0.0009839765,0.3282291,0.07526003,0.17206573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041161716,0.0006090641,0.5900206,0.0032599042,0.0009382302,0.00029714633,0.11003392,0.005776819,0.002320285,0.079341725,0.20632672,0.00066400704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91465497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94203895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08559167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08559167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16843002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6210139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121370532","doi":"","title":"The Administrative Foundations of Self-Enforcing Constitutions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Administrative law; Rule of law; Law and economics; Constitutional law; Political science; Public law; Power (physics); Law; Economics; Politics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.037400080061204495,"score_gpt":0.322590394232025,"score_spread":0.2851903141708205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121370532","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16823846,0.0011805337,0.1471461,0.018386547,0.00027219512,0.00022659815,0.00020373196,0.00027588475,0.66406995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.974053,0.0003383473,0.014158856,0.00044250433,0.00013789056,0.0001617457,0.00006343489,0.00004931864,0.010594941],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909781,0.0035290779,0.0005587211,0.0014590978,0.0021569314,0.001318001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856596,0.0064849365,0.0017500629,0.0033445482,0.0021381266,0.0006227266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010110715,0.00020141779,0.00049281446,0.002030095,0.005222226,0.00896638,0.0013787787,0.0022246884,0.005179531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021531641,0.0004929399,0.0006670382,0.0014160534,0.02579714,0.006941675,0.003835676,0.0039574387,0.000685772],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.875487e-7,0.000002663717,0.000040018385,0.0000015448965,6.301434e-7,0.000005395665,0.0001194414,0.00019513833,0.000025873838,0.9990722,0.00006458311,0.00047170656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013349196,0.0000051150078,0.00024926537,0.000012252259,0.000003241699,0.000010295832,0.000116609386,0.0012914458,0.00011167928,0.9903867,0.0077945455,0.000005647992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006653812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051280186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010110715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056464365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063562263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053471267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121456859","doi":"","title":"Does the Observer Have an Effect?: An Analysis of the Use of the Dialogue Metaphor in Canada's Courts","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Legislature; Charter; Normative; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03993620394470653,"score_gpt":0.276923128913568,"score_spread":0.23698692496886148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121456859","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31914577,0.004215732,0.004923851,0.04012075,0.0002853515,0.00010452979,0.00024501534,0.000072499926,0.63088655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881109,0.0005780242,0.00045371347,0.001625597,0.000024519482,0.000029099117,0.000023202716,0.000028635768,0.009126273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99236685,0.0033542851,0.000091425194,0.00043233883,0.0017718648,0.0019831762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99343324,0.0032117458,0.0004684342,0.00016823225,0.0020101545,0.0007081687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036222069,0.00041513253,0.0004879883,0.0027692993,0.034574293,0.015477352,0.0021058444,0.003993619,0.0042841197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011346528,0.00030205914,0.0004387201,0.0053803865,0.031149961,0.0042321724,0.004303307,0.0038794759,0.00028299485],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003318204,0.000023946353,0.0030329719,0.00007199801,0.000007967267,0.00063558726,0.3970199,0.00021176573,0.0003675996,0.58239645,0.008707901,0.007490769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028262488,0.000028644985,0.021448432,0.0004823846,0.00006599833,0.000280169,0.7266599,0.001905747,0.00059203414,0.038270652,0.21012658,0.00011122162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9621944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96469724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1147471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1147471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.081595555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8325524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121467949","doi":"","title":"From the MVR to Chaoulli v. Quebec: The Road Not Taken and the Future of Section 7","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Charter; Confusion; Economic Justice; Law; Law and economics; Limit (mathematics); Political science; Sociology; Business; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.011643503852175708,"score_gpt":0.2471956735442659,"score_spread":0.23555216969209017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121467949","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06675033,0.02900677,0.0038075254,0.5235783,0.0017058279,0.00007103279,0.00049005804,0.00016009745,0.3744301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77888525,0.008285206,0.002776819,0.10899243,0.0007115782,0.00005567184,0.00021541197,0.00010773367,0.09996992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939751,0.0012068264,0.00016979278,0.00058594206,0.002281812,0.0017805845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892545,0.003104437,0.00046727306,0.00045721632,0.0056564123,0.001060147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006030332,0.00019998696,0.00043084574,0.0009730893,0.010623719,0.011394788,0.002001281,0.0066529578,0.0058380645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017905593,0.0003457135,0.00054719497,0.0009616768,0.009097589,0.003936149,0.0016164797,0.007762865,0.00047854192],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048456488,0.000015209765,0.0018136845,0.00010040638,0.000015232164,0.00038816984,0.003705474,0.00035090352,0.00051463273,0.8891647,0.08073853,0.02314477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049400616,0.00008262875,0.012800507,0.0008045506,0.00006390684,0.00021502345,0.0062614144,0.0014211932,0.0013885521,0.088353485,0.8883832,0.00017616694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9659946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9781774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09000391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09000391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1360047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6530271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121490751","doi":"","title":"Sclerotization of the Judiciary: Judicial Exits from the U.S. Courts of Appeals are Politically Motivated","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Politics; Presidential system; Presidential election; Law; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.06744096425144024,"score_gpt":0.3470883783276678,"score_spread":0.27964741407622756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121490751","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939966,0.0002752672,0.00016529561,0.0006083246,0.0000155693,0.000011247198,0.0004968329,0.0000064261963,0.0044244616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980336,0.00008011267,0.000041195348,0.0001136021,0.00003488437,0.000008329594,0.00070319464,0.000005087303,0.0009800218],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99716324,0.000855515,0.00027672705,0.0005923502,0.0004815495,0.00063059886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94962,0.014223447,0.027534343,0.001870815,0.0023944136,0.0043569887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035381047,0.00015911902,0.0004979349,0.0019237101,0.00095995225,0.002876285,0.0007261546,0.0011108901,0.0060698707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022573803,0.00027776705,0.0003856345,0.002560156,0.00096137135,0.0012590381,0.0016247613,0.0020689918,0.0011987425],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012613714,0.00008168481,0.9916107,0.000012149332,0.000054483968,0.000086049484,0.0010702146,0.00014878355,0.00019884243,0.0007659416,0.0011022461,0.004742678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007011752,0.00004006563,0.99728656,0.000013343123,0.000014460361,0.00003705936,0.00076388253,0.00036568858,0.00008471143,0.00027059874,0.001110257,0.000006358752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015920805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038596164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015920805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010897949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080213253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031656325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121492944","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2993","title":"Formal versus Functional Method in Comparative Constitutional Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Comparative law; Public law; Constitutional law; Supreme court; Political science; Jurisprudence; Municipal law; Common law","score_opus":0.11159816403449356,"score_gpt":0.36442469710557523,"score_spread":0.25282653307108166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121492944","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062505044,0.024858132,0.7310889,0.012089777,0.0015657103,0.00037182242,0.00027300522,0.0002531798,0.22324906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55233854,0.015370914,0.40374616,0.004556087,0.0037028678,0.003277288,0.0004990578,0.00041472857,0.016094474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9474881,0.04553797,0.0010872885,0.0021874113,0.0029403134,0.0007589658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9526356,0.040254883,0.0014572181,0.0037394685,0.0015366225,0.00037622865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03885845,0.0013158307,0.001348991,0.0113299005,0.0034694162,0.007795932,0.0030423268,0.003247147,0.011293887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04668735,0.00074374897,0.0013875557,0.0084292665,0.038059056,0.016740927,0.005350263,0.004046378,0.0011591425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030592034,0.000003607577,0.000038492526,0.00004240563,0.0000037919779,0.000013944207,0.00034798772,0.000106639374,0.00001337151,0.99655306,0.00028067772,0.0025931166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010468414,0.000020983374,0.0001476122,0.0001299152,0.000007778813,0.000059758342,0.0003530234,0.00088358094,0.0000737014,0.97350466,0.024798537,0.000009931024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022053984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022618317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03885845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008010455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038069007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20550561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121581988","doi":"","title":"Constitutional, Remedial, and International Dialogues about Rights: The Canadian Experience","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas international law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legislature; Supreme court; Scholarship; Conversation; Political science; Judicial opinion; Sociology; Judicial activism; Judicial review; Globalization; Constitution","score_opus":0.04266739919851232,"score_gpt":0.31727766371422883,"score_spread":0.2746102645157165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121581988","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08051439,0.026390148,0.0007508135,0.21069539,0.0013005239,0.00011219628,0.00040292615,0.00009529588,0.67973834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84046805,0.016331714,0.0007873528,0.020945283,0.00033272422,0.00008410813,0.0001770121,0.00014224312,0.12073159],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870127,0.0027312795,0.00030523184,0.0010242483,0.0038706465,0.0050558588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99029386,0.0035539265,0.00037531,0.00037773146,0.0021426778,0.003256598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007169204,0.00092239416,0.0012662405,0.0037645195,0.09182022,0.021168133,0.0041296966,0.010214636,0.0232109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01270279,0.0005337002,0.0007471385,0.011005798,0.05067737,0.0075026234,0.0096875345,0.011984192,0.00092009443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006273446,0.00008702278,0.0016656987,0.00023195035,0.000014711392,0.0011507189,0.31039,0.00025230914,0.00036579027,0.60055614,0.060810685,0.02441217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020504913,0.000019638683,0.0028554895,0.00033511312,0.000016097774,0.000280963,0.16842765,0.00013748983,0.00013638605,0.013502522,0.8141764,0.00009176239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9946249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27756673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.27756673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27578712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8379202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121624313","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3043190","title":"Judging Constitutional Conventions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.027218476617602978,"score_gpt":0.32164257720152145,"score_spread":0.2944241005839185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121624313","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05691493,0.0009254464,0.020092117,0.029786164,0.0008324146,0.00014506525,0.00016859283,0.000111755624,0.89102346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95827216,0.0003131299,0.0067077107,0.003069563,0.00037780905,0.00013003495,0.00010603847,0.00008253355,0.030941013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97818404,0.010116289,0.0011099185,0.0032922889,0.0053394423,0.0019580515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95720667,0.027409341,0.002151072,0.0066973264,0.005450764,0.0010849405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020905824,0.00060627586,0.0009809125,0.0032038155,0.0087008495,0.014058095,0.0021389439,0.008686118,0.0155621255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08108841,0.00047129858,0.00069563015,0.0018358328,0.025328314,0.011478305,0.0044883657,0.008576577,0.001517828],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008998335,0.000007490508,0.00026372864,0.000013707796,0.0000049566065,0.000028664257,0.0009807001,0.00015509722,0.000058237994,0.9913197,0.003271239,0.0038874426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016056038,0.000015270134,0.0006023737,0.00005708299,0.000011922462,0.000020097381,0.0012911656,0.0005203911,0.00034311958,0.9675057,0.02960459,0.000012355026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00784093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013009219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020905824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006025743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006191411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11056191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121631039","doi":"","title":"Electoral Cycles Among U.S. Courts of Appeals Judges","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Toulouse Capitole Publications (University Toulouse 1 Capitole)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Impartiality; Ideology; Political science; Law; Presidential system; Presidential election; Quarter (Canadian coin); Priming (agriculture); Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.02752323547200709,"score_gpt":0.2707190911384171,"score_spread":0.24319585566641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121631039","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99595153,0.00008844652,0.000043436423,0.00018468905,0.000006020686,0.000008411465,0.00011407699,0.00000352815,0.0035998148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987232,0.000029299103,0.000028858425,0.000035371406,0.000007826849,0.0000059838803,0.00011053359,0.0000016271264,0.0010572224],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986808,0.0005722784,0.00006152927,0.00025987637,0.00017019166,0.00025531184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98769647,0.0062872753,0.002453633,0.0006275716,0.0016427244,0.0012922685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027305202,0.00007331837,0.00020617562,0.0012855044,0.0010991215,0.0016830388,0.0002662361,0.0005885033,0.0052061244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017002085,0.00017299662,0.00012351418,0.00095792074,0.00056152104,0.0005140236,0.00063561305,0.000559828,0.0006971592],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007424387,0.0004027358,0.9311688,0.000046082077,0.000058744088,0.00023903114,0.016755419,0.000585031,0.0020969375,0.0065577375,0.00657933,0.034767825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003260579,0.00012849437,0.9862309,0.00001685902,0.000010769613,0.00006564183,0.005069409,0.000846086,0.00033689337,0.0013171996,0.0059171133,0.00002811599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017022196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030062085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017022196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012566659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005471561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0338462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121660356","doi":"","title":"Equal Autonomy in Canadian Federalism: The Continuing Search for Balance in the Interpretation of the Division of Powers","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Parliament; Constitution; Federalism; Political science; Autonomy; Jurisdiction; Jurisprudence; Separation of powers; Enumerated powers; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Balance (ability); Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.020930806869085335,"score_gpt":0.287236034381105,"score_spread":0.2663052275120197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121660356","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0637645,0.02917717,0.017062388,0.32443768,0.001324826,0.000049619684,0.00021220355,0.0000904675,0.5638811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9486467,0.009137168,0.007302777,0.012422732,0.00046638545,0.000031764772,0.0000675351,0.00006142916,0.021863472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895751,0.0022619925,0.00022043507,0.0009571456,0.0051426035,0.0018427476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938573,0.0024631077,0.00027005273,0.0003463504,0.002480398,0.0005827218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008175919,0.00036579865,0.0007087178,0.0029240712,0.019845683,0.011773864,0.002270123,0.0037221205,0.0039828885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017066406,0.00038576504,0.0004307096,0.004427321,0.03799197,0.005883068,0.004072682,0.008033503,0.00024629178],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060661228,0.0000019564015,0.00018580853,0.000020029769,0.0000027749463,0.000023218503,0.0043956246,0.0001300146,0.000041709092,0.98341906,0.0043351515,0.007438493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025573652,0.000010305646,0.004833309,0.0002545938,0.000023265009,0.00006477694,0.005722783,0.0012441644,0.00022412,0.69975626,0.28775442,0.0000863899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9620046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.977101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14903511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14903511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12284311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9869987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121721822","doi":"10.1080/20508840.2015.1041704.45","title":"On Statutory Interpretation and the (Canadian) Rule of Law: Interpretive Presumptions as Boundary Setting","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Fondation pour la recherche juridique","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Law; Philosophy of law; Jurisprudence; Statutory law; Public law; Rule of law; Comparative law; Boilerplate text; Private law; Common law; Political science; Black letter law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01705135909295512,"score_gpt":0.2729327685446145,"score_spread":0.2558814094516594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121721822","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042933024,0.009020031,0.04417714,0.047704272,0.0003769357,0.00008157608,0.00023134379,0.000113676375,0.85536194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96880275,0.0035059608,0.012253091,0.0024054134,0.00011379741,0.00004054535,0.00008458753,0.000075281365,0.012718619],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880328,0.003592068,0.00038204397,0.0012047141,0.0049975594,0.0017907706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878675,0.0066235866,0.000731593,0.00094186346,0.0033012596,0.000534336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0097518945,0.0005779427,0.00086754776,0.0049971486,0.02109154,0.016264899,0.0032928498,0.003632611,0.004078417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018703617,0.0005315586,0.00065645634,0.005547904,0.094166264,0.0074504605,0.0050590816,0.006651936,0.00039360073],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022918666,0.0000012302287,0.00009904661,0.00000971613,8.6884313e-7,0.000025555615,0.005185125,0.00011160009,0.000016603017,0.9923052,0.0005626629,0.0016801591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010390653,0.000008183765,0.0018452357,0.00035879132,0.000019733212,0.00009724799,0.010670198,0.001513955,0.0002236419,0.91197187,0.07322667,0.000054147822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9062585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9186504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9123381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.087661915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.090805024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6360347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121765147","doi":"10.1093/jrls/jlaa002","title":"Legislated Rights in the real world","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Legislation; Adjudication; Law; Political science; Legislature; Argument (complex analysis); Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0890259935829956,"score_gpt":0.3838872765834966,"score_spread":0.29486128300050096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121765147","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030789124,0.07548422,0.01876123,0.21682827,0.0024982893,0.00007364955,0.00015925652,0.0000882883,0.6553177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91479987,0.022758579,0.005013138,0.029034412,0.0019042457,0.0003466598,0.00014979117,0.000053845528,0.025939515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98053724,0.013306599,0.00048648406,0.001456108,0.0028067767,0.0014067657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993636,0.00392902,0.0005820106,0.0008976547,0.00064189965,0.00031340637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012913475,0.0002782492,0.00053285493,0.0017302278,0.005690851,0.012377084,0.0015951799,0.005829279,0.0034062348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012871106,0.0003781904,0.00039261795,0.00204649,0.058030874,0.012193604,0.00344367,0.0075573125,0.00046444184],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.5622675e-7,0.0000033497308,0.000017170873,0.000008866567,9.62886e-7,0.00000657458,0.0007483918,0.00003208734,0.00001341941,0.99697936,0.0011869674,0.0010023317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011283689,0.00001322675,0.00034475143,0.00022660394,0.000004191873,0.000038084407,0.0021015808,0.00011097479,0.00007068911,0.7753884,0.22167853,0.000011678723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060966373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062812115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012913475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006490108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007308556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06829381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121814501","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1161","title":"Policy Preference Change and Appointments to the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Discretion; Preference; Political science; Prime minister; Law; Politics; Prime (order theory); Economics","score_opus":0.06908001797112422,"score_gpt":0.2897506825737815,"score_spread":0.22067066460265727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121814501","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9252663,0.0005963548,0.0002705266,0.009031186,0.00007744614,0.000049413262,0.00041422987,0.000011357693,0.06428318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99455786,0.00014541391,0.000053369746,0.00043530442,0.0000159585,0.0000052139476,0.000060510345,0.0000036711092,0.0047226236],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947345,0.00071383506,0.000105392835,0.0005048937,0.0014735546,0.002467762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98613495,0.003466624,0.0022388357,0.00042835515,0.0052984497,0.0024327163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040039504,0.000098940975,0.00039667502,0.0012432341,0.0101388935,0.0038651496,0.0011407302,0.0013807584,0.008942501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025493195,0.00016560698,0.00022239536,0.0025855924,0.003182039,0.0009820417,0.0010959248,0.0022232714,0.0004692146],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011304747,0.0004932277,0.52995133,0.00021401033,0.00019101902,0.002364785,0.09174912,0.004895642,0.003607408,0.20943713,0.06766549,0.0883004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009757615,0.00008481315,0.86431044,0.0001422834,0.000064972584,0.00017013591,0.048135094,0.0027855441,0.00080308015,0.010023016,0.073261306,0.00012173753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9746884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9896612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94123065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058769356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049178515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42640352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121890113","doi":"10.1111/1467-9337.00208","title":"Judicial Hegemony: Dworkin’s <i>Freedom’s Law</i> and the Spectrum of Constitutional Democracies","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Democracy; Political science; Constitutional law; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.02104602275551616,"score_gpt":0.2454582728427759,"score_spread":0.22441225008725973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121890113","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22094917,0.0058725816,0.017629966,0.06509696,0.00015151562,0.000030801177,0.00003844361,0.000034036842,0.6901964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946951,0.0005458716,0.0009849317,0.0008519119,0.000059343856,0.000010758873,0.0000059500626,0.000005112114,0.0028410743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739885,0.0010081956,0.000057523543,0.00035306485,0.0006713492,0.00051104784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829453,0.0010394607,0.00014191559,0.00017331293,0.00017815335,0.00017260235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029751244,0.00018389992,0.00030218097,0.0022546356,0.0063651595,0.006595565,0.00065918633,0.0020089603,0.0018181076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045323367,0.00016583753,0.0002051729,0.0012854836,0.027351817,0.0060279,0.0029117547,0.0029190124,0.00014199615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030604772,0.0000043676228,0.000111977555,0.0000019732206,4.9256477e-7,0.000013911472,0.00083884393,0.0000428162,0.000043126423,0.99671125,0.0003926571,0.0018354898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011146888,0.0000070327824,0.0005835165,0.000016829854,0.0000016940958,0.000029025685,0.0015059449,0.00032536735,0.00009601776,0.98423845,0.0131801,0.0000049534683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019726139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018303508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019726139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063527767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003004753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046092868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121892939","doi":"10.36644/mlr.114.7.constitutional","title":"Constitutional Avoidance as Interpretation and as Remedy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Michigan Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional interpretation; Law and economics; Epistemology; Positive economics; Political science; Economics; Law; Constitution; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01983119137489859,"score_gpt":0.316266567124098,"score_spread":0.2964353757491994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121892939","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016811695,0.0124592455,0.15161103,0.09219696,0.003930754,0.00017343358,0.000110670546,0.00036839207,0.7223379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86663747,0.004314312,0.029829703,0.029195474,0.004572737,0.00049705006,0.0001180126,0.00039409625,0.06444111],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9768306,0.009747604,0.0011217839,0.004265121,0.006188988,0.0018460164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990428,0.0048488798,0.0007756332,0.0025128205,0.0010801484,0.0003544787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01435618,0.000969449,0.0013453536,0.0023651302,0.0062651415,0.012472209,0.0038973005,0.011065453,0.0059027644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019703962,0.0005311701,0.0012523606,0.0015357769,0.06954578,0.014891542,0.0093352385,0.016043134,0.00116942],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001536316,0.0000020380287,0.0000137461575,0.000008267424,0.0000011890459,0.000013768697,0.0003101559,0.000051754854,0.0000308665,0.99813783,0.00048168376,0.00094702916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011456919,0.000010542748,0.000031272866,0.000054301177,0.0000073446054,0.00003980746,0.00023990768,0.00021928395,0.0001382106,0.95607424,0.043162324,0.00001125058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003089758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024798834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01435618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008230024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00853601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07592362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121914176","doi":"","title":"Through Which Glass Darkly? Constitutional Principle in Legality and Constitutionality Review","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Constitutionality; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Judicial review; Adjudication; Constitutional review; Common law; Constitution; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.041045752936972206,"score_gpt":0.3366855014808204,"score_spread":0.29563974854384817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121914176","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027068695,0.044073578,0.083965,0.35139793,0.0042437767,0.00022041831,0.0002030488,0.0002179367,0.4886095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8921182,0.009956653,0.012771375,0.038029723,0.0032471376,0.00035147666,0.00009224924,0.00020271126,0.043230478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98107845,0.010234967,0.00069765496,0.0029628952,0.0032697697,0.0017562911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819421,0.01285686,0.00080060924,0.0021976402,0.0016416871,0.00056098134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021807207,0.00030130096,0.0008327188,0.0025284966,0.007889853,0.014170469,0.001579894,0.007144071,0.00478623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038134944,0.0004386682,0.00058049185,0.0020259637,0.07019665,0.019873245,0.005242732,0.009456761,0.0008031352],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002118875,0.0000016661595,0.000037151458,0.00001090076,0.0000014129486,0.0000130335675,0.00064468035,0.000030491017,0.000022674674,0.9958845,0.0013317423,0.002019551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010542885,0.00001264478,0.00014218922,0.00012385368,0.0000063217594,0.00004165623,0.0008484941,0.000099940386,0.00011921098,0.9126045,0.085976675,0.000013943525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013962267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010343439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021807207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008033249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012756648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11532891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122024307","doi":"","title":"Consequences for Broken Political Promises: Lawyer-Politicians and the Rules of Professional Conduct","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Professional conduct; Politics; Law; Political science; Legal ethics; Legal profession; Rule of law; Ballot; Law and economics; Sociology; Voting","score_opus":0.040312641239296565,"score_gpt":0.3249904711513873,"score_spread":0.28467782991209073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122024307","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15208699,0.0028451006,0.043749914,0.10930277,0.0009107625,0.0002135183,0.0001752248,0.00010179052,0.6906139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97844005,0.00075492874,0.0031428437,0.006545054,0.00028334893,0.000117693045,0.000035380686,0.00004159904,0.010639092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9614109,0.016473874,0.0021053916,0.004111783,0.009681324,0.0062167654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9598378,0.026124377,0.004759205,0.0041211788,0.003420222,0.001737232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02555615,0.0003113636,0.0006657898,0.001638888,0.014319669,0.014198965,0.0020353158,0.014818861,0.0054078335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06533487,0.00090055994,0.0009535554,0.0013559943,0.037272986,0.013140154,0.0066549336,0.017895928,0.00092585455],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008698791,0.000015068513,0.0006225797,0.000010763642,0.0000031835443,0.00019925703,0.0018638389,0.00016081959,0.000047549194,0.9938338,0.0015365208,0.0016979026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055362485,0.000046679772,0.0033879096,0.00021606544,0.000025746316,0.0004708842,0.0060621183,0.0013919801,0.0003585114,0.9373716,0.05053858,0.00007451884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020171924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016620005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02555615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00850063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010229668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13515544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122127272","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1261","title":"The McLachlin Court and the Charter in 2012","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Unanimity; Commission","score_opus":0.029108986470560115,"score_gpt":0.29518634674801403,"score_spread":0.26607736027745393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122127272","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07058312,0.30555698,0.0017707031,0.28364843,0.005054434,0.00007224885,0.0006151395,0.000103186874,0.3325957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7550108,0.076062046,0.0013911591,0.07210198,0.003675686,0.0001498098,0.0005411884,0.0000863304,0.09098091],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992063,0.0023934927,0.00038252972,0.0009381351,0.0030772674,0.0011454069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910617,0.004960487,0.0011664781,0.00022844457,0.0021500173,0.00043289192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054048365,0.0003036049,0.0005249517,0.0035834683,0.007389099,0.010873273,0.00097153586,0.0066261403,0.0039045748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027965857,0.0005181101,0.00034494378,0.0061325557,0.0058305725,0.0063236104,0.0020454943,0.00744048,0.00041596676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000726747,0.000035742498,0.002224128,0.0003444915,0.000018649194,0.00023763646,0.005854613,0.00037846467,0.00025325283,0.7652131,0.15537763,0.06998962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015382131,0.00003496477,0.014781379,0.001411572,0.0000223208,0.00013200073,0.0025148948,0.00025456015,0.0004885919,0.020800509,0.959481,0.000062836734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21387136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27421352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78612864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037825104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024650967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42525297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122212514","doi":"10.1017/s2045381711000037","title":"Comparative, global and transnational constitutionalism: The emergence of a transnational legal-pluralist order","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Constitutionalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Political science; Comparative law; Tort; Law and economics; Legal pluralism; Context (archaeology); Constitutional law; Law; Private law; Sociology; Legal realism; Democracy; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.045701480162140776,"score_gpt":0.3424627571035268,"score_spread":0.29676127694138604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122212514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2999407,0.0068698004,0.024039712,0.02450616,0.00020652826,0.000042754014,0.00012095912,0.00006797018,0.6442055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958496,0.00035694247,0.0012672564,0.00029133767,0.000033193348,0.0000127274,0.000020248759,0.000014201134,0.0021544592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996523,0.0019478798,0.00009166095,0.0006195685,0.00053022866,0.00028765853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99661106,0.0017347016,0.00027730805,0.00073700515,0.0003794961,0.00026041016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064832824,0.00015363621,0.000354676,0.0018461355,0.003921091,0.008847021,0.0006460644,0.0014353858,0.0040702308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038990316,0.00014452256,0.00022726125,0.0022886787,0.044366967,0.00853164,0.0038789546,0.0029090107,0.00013113103],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018790843,0.0000015597808,0.00011096414,0.000006563291,9.253345e-7,0.000017343398,0.0026929248,0.00005282665,0.000047949947,0.99565387,0.00018836613,0.0012248828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008219667,0.00001618043,0.00251406,0.00010641549,0.0000064751994,0.00012757443,0.011342335,0.00062541617,0.00022126985,0.91732234,0.06770044,0.000009226648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035165176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005243645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008847021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005734897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022229531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041609764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122261122","doi":"","title":"Waldron, Waluchow and the Merits of Constitutionalism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Judicial review; Political science; Autonomy; Law and economics; Law; Constitutional law; Democracy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.008906481484102238,"score_gpt":0.2645156749137673,"score_spread":0.2556091934296651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122261122","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03678688,0.052799754,0.025991417,0.42166197,0.0039012493,0.000084294705,0.000057036217,0.00007916791,0.45863825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90300107,0.013044176,0.0057171406,0.041697524,0.0048826197,0.00019887942,0.00002688044,0.00008788191,0.03134387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907607,0.0048344145,0.00032570597,0.0008909517,0.0021817924,0.0010063843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98481816,0.012555016,0.0005886371,0.00078412634,0.00081480347,0.00043927672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0146622425,0.0002991916,0.0007491419,0.0019579253,0.0066783163,0.011524928,0.0011288029,0.0064488873,0.0029364675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027965648,0.00042792177,0.0004739074,0.0017898824,0.040335767,0.01244296,0.004184147,0.008068171,0.00040811606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044881417,0.000002714817,0.000030253193,0.000010022285,0.0000014613333,0.0000141629935,0.00027851693,0.00005356534,0.000018940073,0.99632925,0.0019016978,0.0013549073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017420238,0.000009931518,0.00014524531,0.00007050535,0.0000045200627,0.000022668612,0.00031015967,0.00016200673,0.00008149684,0.94853455,0.050631013,0.000010469337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047147004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060105626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0146622425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006429032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058346586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077542245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122263052","doi":"","title":"Bills of Rights as Process: The Canadian Experience","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Process (computing); Articulation (sociology); Charter; Law and economics; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Product (mathematics); Fundamental rights; Public relations; Public administration; Law; Business; Sociology; Human rights; Computer science","score_opus":0.010676770037661243,"score_gpt":0.2931669308882238,"score_spread":0.28249016085056255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122263052","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17907514,0.008181758,0.0039311317,0.13297324,0.00094392605,0.00021719566,0.00039793336,0.00011619661,0.6741634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90413654,0.0047691027,0.0018802756,0.007923696,0.00009523844,0.00006003601,0.00011471003,0.000112784786,0.080907494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9740486,0.007092364,0.0005584415,0.0018424361,0.009326751,0.007131407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984649,0.00604108,0.0006751975,0.00073376764,0.0047037033,0.0031971745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013737494,0.00081868365,0.0009759245,0.0029350256,0.08612751,0.018844007,0.0038429417,0.007825579,0.011365297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026120007,0.0009059617,0.0007747953,0.00863034,0.05044452,0.007275823,0.007751696,0.012115831,0.0007694183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005499567,0.000047807458,0.0017765108,0.00013125548,0.000009608129,0.0010833862,0.33286908,0.00059177855,0.00039845615,0.6117632,0.031815812,0.019458085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030597374,0.00003425178,0.002949577,0.00030433488,0.00001874578,0.00030517395,0.1923463,0.0005548535,0.0003288919,0.0182625,0.784718,0.00014676742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9954757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6837647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.31623533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31872448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7930701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122343195","doi":"","title":"The Hydraulics of Constitutional Claims: Multiplicity of Actors in Constitutional Interpretation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Judicial interpretation; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Democracy; Law; Legalization; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.024609461167033723,"score_gpt":0.2673882039217682,"score_spread":0.2427787427547345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122343195","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12764706,0.0046842005,0.3385747,0.07012402,0.0006928892,0.0003056525,0.00010268212,0.00042081624,0.4574479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9751982,0.00062464393,0.016138824,0.0018565818,0.0003440425,0.00024707158,0.00003309809,0.00013284326,0.005424788],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9324853,0.04677238,0.0020134256,0.004761106,0.009683827,0.0042840126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9404232,0.047832955,0.0029585543,0.0056457273,0.0018870932,0.0012525074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04196609,0.00079708954,0.0015611568,0.007186435,0.019637546,0.027247982,0.0038836885,0.009080852,0.0075796004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045573127,0.0016928738,0.0016871443,0.004438002,0.14219962,0.053021565,0.028208815,0.013700775,0.00071644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009308854,0.0000049788036,0.00026779654,0.000024082663,0.000005348363,0.0001224551,0.017709313,0.00023865861,0.000116284195,0.97850275,0.00030099327,0.002697928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002273136,0.000015853284,0.00030054472,0.0001356432,0.000014046076,0.00012874545,0.011961029,0.0010794292,0.00030808122,0.95941406,0.026574839,0.000044970464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00533976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039261025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04196609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013764668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009574521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22194058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122367334","doi":"","title":"The New Constitution and the Judicialization of Pure Politics Worldwide","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Politics; Law; Constitutionalism; Human rights; Constitution; Democracy","score_opus":0.017601125761629022,"score_gpt":0.292893257251816,"score_spread":0.27529213149018694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122367334","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018457172,0.022424022,0.013652391,0.08234651,0.004123433,0.00006591559,0.000119175056,0.0001488017,0.8586626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72600424,0.012255136,0.008172647,0.031123077,0.008721947,0.00029649583,0.0002555064,0.00023943276,0.21293154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98965245,0.0037979928,0.0006687327,0.001959934,0.0026638543,0.0012570814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937179,0.003010446,0.00049703,0.0014825143,0.0008949125,0.00039704458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010339627,0.00030263505,0.0005840331,0.0017295139,0.004778366,0.01552109,0.0013945126,0.005187904,0.009167557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012542641,0.00041947933,0.0005035167,0.0013323849,0.022083519,0.0112909805,0.005839294,0.010449769,0.0012208301],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024819847,0.000003491222,0.000023569624,0.000008089976,0.0000012992627,0.000017305687,0.00028836896,0.000045408426,0.000055886834,0.9930011,0.003512613,0.00304048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027005737,0.000018121424,0.0003985356,0.00015339661,0.0000074257487,0.00006836183,0.0003682539,0.0002950638,0.00024294468,0.5167427,0.48165736,0.000020816735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004156463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048462627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01552109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007374547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062442557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054681838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122419111","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3566","title":"Judicial Influence on the Duty to Consult and Accommodate","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Judicial review; Supreme court; Law; Legislature; Cabinet (room); Incentive; Political science; Context (archaeology); Negotiation; Law and economics; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.04834772899519527,"score_gpt":0.2925433267684163,"score_spread":0.24419559777322106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122419111","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1587413,0.0028391099,0.008566259,0.08016264,0.00086627156,0.00015694261,0.00010386002,0.00006882683,0.74849474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96619576,0.0006694342,0.000688346,0.011265574,0.00047273253,0.00003828989,0.000019065586,0.000034506862,0.020616306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94490176,0.016725462,0.0016146532,0.005535377,0.020650264,0.010572541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8814977,0.07641002,0.005883127,0.0042537055,0.025531929,0.0064234915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037136443,0.00020989068,0.0007172658,0.0024625736,0.014576605,0.0136886155,0.0020566825,0.0079823965,0.007441889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.102645345,0.0005860444,0.0005601357,0.0020209008,0.017943138,0.00333972,0.004153628,0.0072957263,0.0007426692],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038629423,0.000089005116,0.008199369,0.000052137268,0.00003905631,0.00069539394,0.012850584,0.0005140413,0.0015487435,0.9377866,0.020694429,0.01749205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017580096,0.0002543406,0.0453723,0.0007299273,0.00024565007,0.001092591,0.020353297,0.0038789965,0.0034519185,0.34807044,0.57600474,0.0003698598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1623913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26155585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8376087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01935054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036259927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3228922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122420731","doi":"","title":"Democracy and Dissent: Reconsidering the Judicial Review of the Political Sphere","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Dissent; Democracy; Supreme court; Law; Politics; Political science; Sociology; Constitutional court; Law and economics; Constitution","score_opus":0.0832494212198956,"score_gpt":0.36687341694996023,"score_spread":0.28362399573006464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122420731","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07481398,0.083352946,0.04562095,0.4500588,0.008971138,0.00036997118,0.00013842044,0.0001405036,0.33653334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9221235,0.009284467,0.008405378,0.039036296,0.007597781,0.0002063079,0.00004535568,0.000105147,0.013195763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.89853954,0.062152058,0.0049563413,0.006950821,0.02065909,0.006742012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8190453,0.14202,0.0067621353,0.009008991,0.020035803,0.0031278308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10297575,0.0004085094,0.0018490324,0.0054111355,0.011246635,0.0183975,0.004218275,0.012421919,0.0021769872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18787256,0.00061949523,0.00093248766,0.0036922477,0.036141224,0.014629747,0.006709664,0.0139397355,0.00041240043],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026707221,0.000017765142,0.00059310254,0.000096425465,0.000022595808,0.0002039008,0.006244606,0.00035134068,0.0001801623,0.9615734,0.011028909,0.01966107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084541854,0.000054212363,0.0016045254,0.00058115914,0.00004016552,0.00016079818,0.0042463825,0.001478225,0.0005927616,0.8558984,0.13516822,0.000090586414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014903059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02438795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10297575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012758022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024866108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5445943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122481768","doi":"10.32920/29936570","title":"Exploring a More Independent Freedom of Peaceful Assembly in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Peaceful coexistence; General assembly; Freedom of religion; Sociology; Law and economics; Human rights","score_opus":0.06874741129468909,"score_gpt":0.2891976940730983,"score_spread":0.22045028277840922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122481768","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10308617,0.0037247476,0.005849147,0.084063776,0.0005309256,0.00014792275,0.0002345784,0.000051051455,0.8023117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9231097,0.002378518,0.0025760245,0.009458646,0.00010519383,0.000040983447,0.00008182837,0.000027925156,0.062221177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933351,0.0008184634,0.00013927344,0.0005969549,0.0021293946,0.002980714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968388,0.0010081327,0.00018508133,0.00015415915,0.0012117822,0.00060209323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032742585,0.0003249209,0.00041815222,0.0018653823,0.03261768,0.013051969,0.0021534467,0.0039054316,0.006794368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060724546,0.0003934816,0.00078006304,0.0021974903,0.015523217,0.0029403092,0.004313682,0.0074444287,0.00029106575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006112221,0.000010334327,0.0005955908,0.00002329101,0.0000059201466,0.0001521381,0.004323262,0.00043993624,0.00015788105,0.983986,0.0056854365,0.0046141543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007509255,0.0000586167,0.020610027,0.0006767716,0.00016531826,0.00026895985,0.039524037,0.007355338,0.0017868528,0.28950426,0.6396752,0.0002995083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9914136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14931226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14931226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22417848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9866772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122505542","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2007.0004","title":"The Reasonable Justice: An Empirical Analysis of Frank Iacobucci's Career on the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Economic Justice; Politics; Sociology; Voting; Political science","score_opus":0.025530191102306383,"score_gpt":0.2686493321745971,"score_spread":0.24311914107229068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122505542","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9694118,0.000981382,0.00009628808,0.004790353,0.00006146167,0.000101590165,0.00072666875,0.000008545629,0.02382185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99094045,0.00060967,0.0000831896,0.00062855345,0.000026195625,0.000027492655,0.00044480333,0.000016490518,0.007223097],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99002504,0.0014094508,0.00024188953,0.00095800235,0.003301967,0.0040635327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9575116,0.0099449,0.0057046106,0.00076917995,0.015308061,0.010761577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005126272,0.0003573515,0.0010439616,0.0059310133,0.030878637,0.009704512,0.0044356724,0.0028254823,0.00885784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034597363,0.0004926637,0.00041915412,0.011508795,0.009073059,0.0028969888,0.0048760213,0.005913807,0.00077169464],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023351987,0.0007469023,0.5829013,0.0001494165,0.000071684946,0.0011176328,0.34542692,0.0004097139,0.00028469332,0.021739388,0.02744224,0.019476606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019548439,0.00007218951,0.51109016,0.00037193534,0.000028700493,0.00013498281,0.46033,0.00088131387,0.00010881346,0.0007140184,0.026166426,0.00008183795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9915023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9968977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09728983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09728983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.099181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7058904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122591002","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0011","title":"Democracy, Community, and Federalism in Electoral Apportionment Cases: The United States, Canada, and Australia in Comparative Perspective","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalist; Democracy; Federalism; Individualism; Jurisprudence; Apportionment; Political science; Legislature; Separation of powers; State (computer science); Sociology; Law; Politics; Law and economics","score_opus":0.06483907648198886,"score_gpt":0.29210837386029515,"score_spread":0.22726929737830628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122591002","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71422815,0.011437151,0.0006265162,0.011565188,0.00017195413,0.00014893201,0.00016959169,0.000022828184,0.26162964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98314464,0.0034704562,0.00045540824,0.0019182137,0.000026753643,0.000076778175,0.000084544554,0.000012095483,0.010811073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944872,0.0015436158,0.00014533095,0.0002465448,0.001384203,0.002193118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929871,0.002727929,0.00038281432,0.00022352285,0.0026231385,0.0010554834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004258779,0.00024646492,0.0007119054,0.0067724674,0.02672905,0.007929141,0.0019077619,0.0027188265,0.0026135535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014675061,0.0003782782,0.00042405876,0.011881331,0.0116209,0.0022917783,0.0046562348,0.0034930892,0.0001284671],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001251149,0.00019799836,0.03696785,0.00035335185,0.000068964924,0.0029009038,0.13764344,0.0017537193,0.00040833565,0.7545046,0.022388449,0.042687334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000096138545,0.00010940464,0.3045349,0.0014345135,0.00020844379,0.0012124139,0.34523743,0.00449987,0.0008321205,0.037621766,0.30397275,0.00024025264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98926675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9964611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8934802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10651983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08160237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7728591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122602294","doi":"10.7202/1074419ar","title":"Les avis consultatifs au Canada : omniprésents, déterminants, banalisés et déroutants : Essai critique de Carissima Mathen, Courts Without Cases: The Law and Politics of Advisory Opinions, Oxford, Hart, 2019 et Kate Puddister, Seeking the Court’s Advice: The Politics of the Canadian Reference Power, Vancouver, UBC Press, 2019","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Politics; Ex parte; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027945566024496472,"score_gpt":0.31434958007070196,"score_spread":0.28640401404620547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122602294","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041170444,0.072842576,0.0016410525,0.39745882,0.0010430941,0.00006688215,0.0009796042,0.00008171122,0.4847158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64855546,0.028398672,0.0011949965,0.048686888,0.00039411124,0.000065744054,0.00025854705,0.00014625919,0.27229932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99298406,0.00093460875,0.00011077747,0.0005302689,0.0029856567,0.002454636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932968,0.0021166261,0.00031932758,0.00015750513,0.0030708995,0.001038809],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024467702,0.00052222284,0.0004803412,0.003489572,0.03621869,0.019965624,0.0023669614,0.006737235,0.0139464885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009445797,0.00067700486,0.00036231885,0.007961901,0.019734766,0.005140021,0.0037789408,0.0057668644,0.0009422739],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025174068,0.000020506464,0.002663334,0.00013852488,0.000016441303,0.000501596,0.050840463,0.0001852973,0.00014478237,0.65283877,0.26138514,0.031240026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001400094,0.000007904807,0.01216554,0.0005140162,0.000025686133,0.00013214833,0.049455635,0.00036951806,0.00014719623,0.029814245,0.90728754,0.0000666952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99441916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9977857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15326925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15326925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21001725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9820877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122619448","doi":"10.5131/ajcl.2014.0030","title":"Economic and Social Rights in National Constitutions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Library science; Media studies; Göran; Sociology; Law; Art; Humanities; Computer science","score_opus":0.03941342542345785,"score_gpt":0.34522461304100094,"score_spread":0.3058111876175431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122619448","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7065334,0.004480116,0.020927537,0.0072106807,0.000339868,0.00022260666,0.02809651,0.00021614163,0.2319732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9694633,0.0010153013,0.0064693713,0.00038643146,0.000102656675,0.00020603192,0.015403672,0.00007201759,0.0068812035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99024254,0.004145828,0.0012637322,0.001718929,0.0017395072,0.00088948343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96464455,0.019953394,0.006775907,0.005749373,0.0021886914,0.00068806397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077626114,0.00019001577,0.00051960663,0.006165856,0.0022603073,0.0041413894,0.00061643345,0.0005877354,0.013458839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038516708,0.00021146295,0.00036077315,0.012243195,0.004250147,0.0053764554,0.0035227106,0.0016776642,0.0009350454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100781675,0.000065752734,0.083288714,0.00037501936,0.000070721966,0.00019837491,0.01500071,0.0018231191,0.0005388678,0.7948362,0.015461052,0.08824062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004577296,0.00004764267,0.2164548,0.0007251447,0.00005250869,0.00022712543,0.008874738,0.0020400889,0.0008506149,0.26553965,0.505056,0.00008584215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010114101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012546042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013458839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028843046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019955481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045024335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122712333","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2175360","title":"Explaining Theoretical Disagreement and Massive Decisional Agreement: The Justificatory View","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Agreement; Epistemology; Econometrics; Psychology; Positive economics; Mathematics; Economics; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.021128428192716077,"score_gpt":0.29860894027831136,"score_spread":0.27748051208559527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122712333","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18794507,0.0016269782,0.21879745,0.16325745,0.00076294213,0.00024125353,0.00032388882,0.0002317238,0.42681324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879985,0.00019622309,0.0069543207,0.0018254253,0.0003813669,0.00010016733,0.000040447645,0.0000478886,0.0024556755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98476255,0.008201072,0.00059100054,0.0020017044,0.0029412347,0.0015024471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9324948,0.048056398,0.0052653477,0.00965863,0.0034206198,0.0011042111],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023464482,0.00068684464,0.0013523676,0.0031167606,0.0050523486,0.007553944,0.004458887,0.009648281,0.015347921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061847243,0.0007844611,0.0012396189,0.0019240709,0.03601882,0.019853234,0.006586221,0.010477448,0.0010165815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001740142,0.000015267013,0.00017581451,0.00002170865,0.000007143838,0.000032512366,0.0007689434,0.00024761775,0.000045924924,0.99694246,0.00056899944,0.0011562705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020651576,0.0000040648147,0.00010478098,0.00001203475,0.000003831808,0.000015647402,0.00025154214,0.0011742711,0.000044315515,0.9974483,0.00091647595,0.0000040048003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015676171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001695871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023464482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042253695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033704147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12409353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122742871","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.3.355","title":"ARGUMENTS OF VIRTUE AND CONSTITUTIONAL CRIMINAL PROCEDURE","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Constitutional interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Democracy; Law and economics; Constitutional theory; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Constitutional law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.02032845432850052,"score_gpt":0.23900120557065604,"score_spread":0.21867275124215552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122742871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045127027,0.011520425,0.048432093,0.11881685,0.0006824561,0.0000522312,0.00007665278,0.000054692846,0.7752375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97387886,0.002081715,0.005374621,0.0058291964,0.00039504014,0.00007776434,0.000018806792,0.00002778128,0.01231606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99142843,0.005263889,0.0002175642,0.000708682,0.0014177244,0.0009635731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926214,0.005409998,0.0005615217,0.00068092736,0.00044561565,0.00028052327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010618689,0.00032784423,0.00060673547,0.0017773551,0.006246289,0.0070593716,0.0011695805,0.0058892616,0.0031012916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01432123,0.0002941343,0.00063614635,0.0014718411,0.06435675,0.0072912443,0.0042702653,0.007480591,0.0003476254],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013107245,0.0000010778733,0.000017548527,0.0000026649345,6.032096e-7,0.000004795629,0.00011834851,0.000030543157,0.0000057797356,0.99926406,0.00027321023,0.0002801134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006653465,0.0000031654768,0.00009393549,0.000024456534,0.0000016796528,0.000012290472,0.00019566582,0.0001244614,0.00004841946,0.98436433,0.015121355,0.0000035580094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052892053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057796077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010618689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006722295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004791191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05615765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122809871","doi":"","title":"A Judiciary Cleaved: Superior Courts, Statutory Courts and the Illogic of Difference","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of New Brunswick Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statutory law; Statute; Windsor; Supreme court; Political science; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.02501657741348886,"score_gpt":0.24908470835970112,"score_spread":0.22406813094621225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122809871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18426001,0.022892457,0.0067047765,0.38486856,0.0009471756,0.000027067803,0.00015327163,0.00004391268,0.4001027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.971283,0.0019765967,0.0007637611,0.01696078,0.00019838427,0.0000082756505,0.00003679907,0.000022882119,0.008749566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99019134,0.0022613097,0.00020988671,0.00092172687,0.003575909,0.0028398875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942462,0.0024429813,0.00046306124,0.00043762889,0.0015670854,0.00084308936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005501661,0.00022059226,0.00056175975,0.0013819298,0.0151484525,0.013674079,0.0017241742,0.0058249864,0.0033295439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014527268,0.00032220111,0.0003155094,0.0023819199,0.054670844,0.008496724,0.005065934,0.013642513,0.00033507147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000076502,0.0000027700426,0.0005248458,0.0000064035257,0.00000205154,0.00003845444,0.0038462328,0.000042216143,0.000040210376,0.9883499,0.0033111442,0.0038281188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057636375,0.000026959682,0.007272579,0.00036981417,0.00002528053,0.00016898532,0.01803915,0.0005834151,0.0003263989,0.8243727,0.14870961,0.000047481208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6324659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6575006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6324659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05682936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045004085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73939717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122815674","doi":"","title":"Witnessing Arbitrariness: Roncarelli v. Duplessis Fifty Years On","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Principle of legality; Normative; Law; Politics; Epistemology; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.012063817984124568,"score_gpt":0.2775531025055072,"score_spread":0.2654892845213826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122815674","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.109369285,0.013245184,0.002275469,0.1667212,0.0011591396,0.00011431982,0.00016245068,0.00007908204,0.7068739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87544227,0.002844387,0.0005629059,0.048151605,0.0005011318,0.00007577563,0.000054078228,0.0000522534,0.07231561],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924338,0.0015668025,0.00012953999,0.0011809207,0.0019615109,0.0027273986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99668187,0.0017727558,0.00022357261,0.0002730206,0.0006908334,0.00035797228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076517374,0.0004123932,0.0006743659,0.0012680431,0.027977237,0.008689759,0.0028537377,0.012137727,0.0043111905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014164734,0.00051770825,0.0006455914,0.001236958,0.020528216,0.005712913,0.0047548413,0.01618237,0.00046554004],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003369438,0.00001879916,0.0011602876,0.000025409952,0.000009984254,0.0009161167,0.02208101,0.00010315871,0.00024411903,0.93196595,0.035654966,0.007786487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056551045,0.00006462417,0.00483931,0.00045009784,0.00007670037,0.00055957405,0.0133897755,0.0007000032,0.0013347561,0.11559462,0.86273414,0.00019985516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7582281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7829077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7582281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038280863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0298945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48639143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122878896","doi":"10.1177/0951629811411751","title":"‘While there’s a breath in my body’: The systemic effects of politically motivated retirement from the Supreme Court","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Supreme court; Suspect; Politics; Economic Justice; Law; Economics; Ideology; Political science; Roberts Court","score_opus":0.022697869826885143,"score_gpt":0.26689744134970783,"score_spread":0.24419957152282268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122878896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97207934,0.0008481464,0.0006869003,0.012153697,0.00005015023,0.000014101048,0.00018271821,0.000023852332,0.013961097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981673,0.00015360932,0.000075929514,0.00059637654,0.000051541276,0.000003917333,0.00003858427,0.000007231746,0.000905572],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985453,0.00086709403,0.00002784814,0.00017544326,0.00010946684,0.00027487698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98575926,0.006828896,0.003975894,0.0009088962,0.0007032249,0.0018238692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029464823,0.00013726404,0.0003700801,0.00045829412,0.0015057792,0.0019062263,0.00045411807,0.0011360688,0.011296522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016122371,0.00019531773,0.0004027946,0.00073188025,0.0026615518,0.00145758,0.00212513,0.0022524751,0.00065271696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001774297,0.0019054788,0.81125283,0.00014174076,0.00063276326,0.001087398,0.009030431,0.0063969884,0.0033627048,0.07339105,0.015873617,0.07515076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014961865,0.00056877045,0.94388604,0.00006120185,0.00023875725,0.00011741451,0.005963114,0.0020437117,0.0007236158,0.037422523,0.008778954,0.00004626768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012248253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021718793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012248253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015544639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011380352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037790596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122916034","doi":"","title":"Federalism and Equality Rights Implementation in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Jurisdiction; Political science; Supreme court; Abortion; Order (exchange); Cooperative federalism; Government (linguistics); Executive order; Reproductive rights; New Federalism; Law; Human rights; Public administration; Law and economics; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.011640047651751589,"score_gpt":0.29531702712380015,"score_spread":0.28367697947204856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122916034","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6352413,0.0058321035,0.0030128106,0.08175519,0.00035912186,0.00031281,0.00077551685,0.000105969746,0.2726053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868709,0.00070905767,0.00063752505,0.0025755123,0.000025149136,0.000027728924,0.00006941609,0.000014072666,0.009070651],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98117423,0.0022378277,0.00044472824,0.0012025518,0.0064892103,0.008451468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9829836,0.004350179,0.0012951897,0.0007074059,0.007518862,0.0031446905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0085742995,0.00017888566,0.0006678588,0.0019737056,0.022826895,0.006992344,0.0019369232,0.00205834,0.0052799163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02742318,0.00044903156,0.00047968753,0.0035491262,0.009336478,0.0016436082,0.004532436,0.00432982,0.00016274184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017040162,0.00013697484,0.052054,0.00024073671,0.00013502908,0.0006449066,0.025103357,0.003649257,0.0011370193,0.8106581,0.033266585,0.072803706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034082588,0.00020691662,0.4932836,0.0008320941,0.00036522272,0.00025130625,0.034476437,0.007585015,0.0027127375,0.07925303,0.38030228,0.00039047623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9963612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22773705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22773705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34277076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89571553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122934301","doi":"10.22145/flr.38.3.5","title":"Judiciaries in Crisis — Some Comparative Perspectives","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Meaning (existential); Political science; Power (physics); Executive power; Law; Political economy; Development economics; Sociology; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0490169392290615,"score_gpt":0.363439455138616,"score_spread":0.3144225159095545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122934301","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016069764,0.23287438,0.00063078804,0.107153825,0.0015681183,0.000021036858,0.00009370036,0.000011585681,0.64157677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86118877,0.0962661,0.0003928368,0.015574077,0.003971768,0.00009109489,0.00012062085,0.00003749875,0.02235721],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99180156,0.00531598,0.00018423812,0.00028045362,0.0009934661,0.0014243318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912566,0.005995106,0.00052266516,0.00025214558,0.0011447448,0.0008286599],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054473444,0.0004705527,0.0007606372,0.008543805,0.008223453,0.018221749,0.0019229137,0.0065102438,0.0144523205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010298226,0.00032516135,0.00035094947,0.009494314,0.021874312,0.010437977,0.0054537165,0.0066893334,0.0010167966],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002255822,0.00003339082,0.00030242064,0.00011814162,0.000006838918,0.00012371494,0.008105211,0.00010417127,0.000025484676,0.9672761,0.016275426,0.0076065604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000589718,0.000063182975,0.006453898,0.0019396087,0.000013128692,0.00030296374,0.07822907,0.00038292416,0.000098525874,0.27956837,0.6328671,0.000022212605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016708087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023843333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023472251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023472251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005154097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17030388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122947590","doi":"10.5040/9781472561312.ch-002","title":"Canada: Protecting Rights in a ‘Worldwide Rights Culture’. An Empirical Study of the Use of Foreign Precedents by the Supreme Court of Canada (1982–2010)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.06039842324295125,"score_gpt":0.26434149545572716,"score_spread":0.2039430722127759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122947590","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.576472,0.017383143,0.0009787446,0.077141464,0.00047974495,0.00013176307,0.0024590243,0.00005279213,0.32490128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9724515,0.003700347,0.0003777991,0.004819654,0.000041103358,0.00002288781,0.0004636391,0.000030961415,0.018092074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920488,0.0006200712,0.0001384437,0.000767258,0.004634149,0.0017911547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879704,0.002740116,0.0016694926,0.00041519973,0.0047569536,0.0024478876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033240754,0.00028933873,0.00035468797,0.0038461573,0.023580369,0.010876438,0.001683473,0.0025391637,0.008359138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02133272,0.0003719933,0.0002908469,0.011663115,0.013574153,0.0052173133,0.004111007,0.0041923164,0.00039294333],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008337388,0.0001232253,0.1504761,0.00033161166,0.00007161626,0.0019854319,0.28694522,0.0007799734,0.0005447941,0.33203846,0.12327128,0.10334895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017074137,0.000037106664,0.27603522,0.00069138623,0.000055799086,0.00038576385,0.24787545,0.00057263597,0.00047563371,0.008333182,0.4653585,0.0001623017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99541384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8661831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13381691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16719432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9709142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122959533","doi":"","title":"Three Narratives About Canadian Election Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Election law; Law; Campaign finance; Narrative; Legislation; Federal election; Public administration; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology; Voting","score_opus":0.01773282879754739,"score_gpt":0.2909031369379172,"score_spread":0.2731703081403698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122959533","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12540413,0.005548767,0.001959614,0.18846011,0.0008582808,0.000100426005,0.00061686285,0.00010326072,0.6769486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92351735,0.002854197,0.0010609231,0.012370065,0.00012740077,0.000077537334,0.00020461163,0.0000724577,0.05971563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.991859,0.0014046691,0.00015196606,0.0007299398,0.0028747462,0.002979673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99447775,0.0015537268,0.0003123721,0.00021885299,0.0021970612,0.0012402023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054192967,0.00072494877,0.00044089134,0.0037337611,0.07447442,0.017736664,0.0030279646,0.004769771,0.009670989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010811827,0.00044914713,0.0005196834,0.006738792,0.033269223,0.005455729,0.0055090417,0.00765637,0.00058504206],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020188392,0.00001243313,0.0016560002,0.000050726998,0.0000045131274,0.00055006036,0.19499941,0.000163242,0.00019060679,0.75623256,0.03802963,0.008090573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009897585,0.000008249977,0.003712462,0.00024721932,0.000017089656,0.00018516809,0.24773374,0.00034176838,0.00019095233,0.028593164,0.71886647,0.0000938789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9869385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9910143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24169536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24169536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17013115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8795259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123040256","doi":"","title":"Of Pigeonholes and Principles: A Reconsideration of Discrimination Law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Common law; Statutory law; Law; Legislature; Action (physics); Quality (philosophy); Prejudice (legal term); Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.076643368074212,"score_gpt":0.28735525985051685,"score_spread":0.21071189177630484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123040256","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03492718,0.012216919,0.20260614,0.4957491,0.005923569,0.000188561,0.00013164288,0.00028033575,0.24797657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8365176,0.0036781293,0.06626016,0.06735103,0.0036263168,0.00047926302,0.00005556037,0.00033794958,0.021694006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9662216,0.017375797,0.0011846038,0.0045808423,0.008030813,0.0026063344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9731972,0.017555026,0.0011403935,0.0041079293,0.002954381,0.0010449949],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03225227,0.0008543872,0.0015155346,0.002964934,0.010282346,0.013533263,0.0046274024,0.015342021,0.0025373911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038179044,0.0010235026,0.0021684843,0.0014584437,0.11386493,0.029992234,0.009956492,0.030247454,0.00057172205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034053444,0.00000480269,0.00004589904,0.000008406907,0.0000017284227,0.000026628777,0.0010884043,0.000095465955,0.000029641486,0.9963007,0.0009034843,0.0014915959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011807572,0.000016741295,0.00006450716,0.000049449503,0.000003760225,0.000047629328,0.0005291726,0.000407391,0.00006294241,0.9747746,0.02401855,0.000013438121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014404779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00988819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03225227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011122889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013008895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17056835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123075200","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.1.137","title":"STRUCTURAL JUDICIAL REVIEW AND THE OBJECTION FROM DEMOCRACY","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Law; Judicial review; Separation of powers; Enforcement; Democracy; Legislation; Federalism; Politics; Judicial activism; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.009126243226453234,"score_gpt":0.2355373833031734,"score_spread":0.22641114007672017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123075200","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05090512,0.011086776,0.05745545,0.51315564,0.0021933203,0.00033934932,0.00011814429,0.00021705539,0.3645291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8949586,0.0031590897,0.0121072,0.06720182,0.0046620513,0.0005033592,0.000056309214,0.000115952265,0.017235696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.89702237,0.055218592,0.00450463,0.0113864,0.024933318,0.0069346325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82871294,0.1284852,0.011499494,0.01537861,0.013797406,0.0021262513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.077561446,0.00040087715,0.0013705121,0.0020277924,0.007853076,0.011595924,0.0032682787,0.018823113,0.0034122472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16479191,0.0007850489,0.0015012559,0.0015523997,0.04126815,0.01064385,0.0076306034,0.016352933,0.00076876755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007785249,0.00000844202,0.00018679145,0.000030140778,0.000008699149,0.000037577473,0.0008155577,0.00014361873,0.000064240136,0.99191356,0.0031678553,0.003615778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012906422,0.00004933104,0.0006663385,0.00014864939,0.000024999372,0.00014847114,0.0004021886,0.00084766996,0.0004419563,0.94482267,0.05228771,0.000031006686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041671186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003805488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.077561446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00868778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015316857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41018903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123080248","doi":"10.4324/9781351201834-9","title":"Quasi-Constitutional Amendments","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Buffalo law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional amendment; Constitution; Repeal; Constitutional law; Statutory law; Law; Political science; Politics; Phenomenon; Constitutional economics; Constitutional theory; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.08522650486391328,"score_gpt":0.37911151265059795,"score_spread":0.2938850077866847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123080248","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015086973,0.0047966107,0.12600422,0.007982835,0.0024681028,0.00044280326,0.00065390114,0.0004949627,0.84206957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7948208,0.0038995773,0.056113947,0.009495215,0.0027158947,0.0016935334,0.0006972174,0.0003559103,0.13020787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9800919,0.00798366,0.0015584368,0.0045293123,0.0038493406,0.0019872494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97946817,0.009560471,0.0016914806,0.0068630422,0.0020111108,0.00040569043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016348094,0.00058988197,0.00073574844,0.0017680529,0.004710078,0.006543216,0.0017026042,0.004061457,0.017412877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028411508,0.00075002696,0.0013384051,0.0016650399,0.024783546,0.0083944015,0.004606884,0.0073421276,0.0032800213],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016277158,0.000002077709,0.000020398935,0.000010280988,0.0000015723446,0.0000073645374,0.00011041746,0.00003977808,0.000032858457,0.9980013,0.0005871102,0.0011851822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027886459,0.000027817507,0.00023274013,0.0000755758,0.000011254658,0.00010964643,0.00013839394,0.00028119975,0.00040035974,0.78505147,0.21362062,0.000023012815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030657419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003200353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017412877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004361945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004140473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08645803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123119869","doi":"","title":"Furthering Substantive Equality Through Administrative Law: Charter Values in Education","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Obligation; Law; Administrative law; Political science; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Realm; Context (archaeology); Sociology","score_opus":0.14175817991856662,"score_gpt":0.394159776083472,"score_spread":0.25240159616490543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123119869","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033717263,0.007060407,0.11867658,0.1643942,0.0010007919,0.00015997872,0.000043666736,0.00013734041,0.6748097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94112885,0.0029299161,0.026258353,0.009438976,0.00036045304,0.00011041044,0.000024378112,0.00006259787,0.019686127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9790509,0.012291062,0.0005163069,0.00081278005,0.0044335504,0.0028953298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9815555,0.012081751,0.0012265178,0.0013631867,0.0023252156,0.0014478633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022026347,0.00047082998,0.0005174986,0.002549195,0.015364633,0.021798724,0.0023516817,0.0052679987,0.0034090134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023589402,0.0003467949,0.00049063895,0.0026387363,0.092846476,0.015722131,0.011010092,0.011309061,0.00046900712],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001794548,0.000005670738,0.00009029813,0.000011146722,5.999295e-7,0.000025103956,0.005604665,0.00009557251,0.000017901235,0.9883454,0.00091228157,0.0048896596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010935988,0.00002298548,0.00071864773,0.0003192519,0.000006369617,0.00005504089,0.011704336,0.000709217,0.00032948627,0.8581143,0.12797134,0.000038033577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13187376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18782638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8681263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032521397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047382258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26221234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123151269","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Structure and Original Intent: A Canadian Perspective","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Perspective (graphical); Legislature; Law; Political science; Relation (database); Constitutional court; Constitution; Computer science","score_opus":0.013015675498741336,"score_gpt":0.2906172350274863,"score_spread":0.277601559528745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123151269","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030227471,0.004759282,0.008079622,0.021835787,0.00017076517,0.000047030786,0.00037537466,0.000046948287,0.9344578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9482911,0.007123821,0.0046833046,0.0014849802,0.00014650359,0.000027205679,0.00023154421,0.00006484729,0.037946653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99549437,0.00063507224,0.00007013989,0.0004703579,0.0021209186,0.001209119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99605995,0.001000532,0.00027631465,0.00029086584,0.0018192107,0.0005530693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002958536,0.0004430974,0.00044301426,0.00543393,0.011922311,0.01003647,0.0020603156,0.0017772273,0.007929572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00741719,0.00029761577,0.00041227683,0.0069568413,0.033244442,0.0053585796,0.0027825334,0.0041776393,0.0004195543],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020211855,0.0000011160429,0.00012815511,0.0000063126795,8.233125e-7,0.000011740636,0.0013682347,0.000104791055,0.000020417358,0.99576867,0.00069673406,0.001891131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003489666,0.000018259896,0.00595966,0.000311379,0.000038558406,0.00011910207,0.008925937,0.0016328597,0.00026752832,0.64156955,0.3410465,0.00007580934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9626922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97035944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10257847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10257847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10093986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74426234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123170955","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1066","title":"Judges and Politics: An Essay From Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Politics; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02987739487511638,"score_gpt":0.2944399156730049,"score_spread":0.26456252079788856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123170955","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015592067,0.18115328,0.000661631,0.4549623,0.0049596047,0.00005705443,0.00041035985,0.00003310984,0.34217057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42834115,0.16072215,0.0013260697,0.15464799,0.002860059,0.000122067824,0.000280153,0.0002228026,0.2514776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99542254,0.00060531223,0.00010193489,0.00039867827,0.0019449606,0.001526515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963748,0.0013157327,0.00011065292,0.00006734855,0.0014948562,0.00063657534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028289023,0.0005610505,0.0006193403,0.0028899878,0.033133894,0.011947068,0.0019536624,0.00804681,0.006545463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065167667,0.00064540503,0.00038698202,0.0071527376,0.017171534,0.0033432422,0.002818025,0.008063967,0.00069786713],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023234144,0.000031846812,0.0013912664,0.0001860719,0.000014182418,0.00043792438,0.02232682,0.00035489132,0.0001989719,0.56581265,0.39196953,0.017252667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018535211,0.0000042179545,0.0028331396,0.0004828269,0.000011991439,0.00005952943,0.009887657,0.00010153751,0.00008884809,0.018880835,0.9675944,0.00003648444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9897803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99507844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81506187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18493815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1882797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94535625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123222988","doi":"","title":"Reassessing the Constitutional Foundation ofDelegated Legislation in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Foundation (evidence); Law; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.029040781574877356,"score_gpt":0.2900123740432471,"score_spread":0.26097159246836976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123222988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48171338,0.0030499548,0.001978347,0.12731709,0.00040332685,0.00019162564,0.0013996534,0.00007177794,0.38387474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96417004,0.00082994066,0.00073430804,0.009267946,0.00006618375,0.000038951745,0.00014389095,0.00004311907,0.024705626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98339164,0.0016860563,0.00043988062,0.0014196014,0.0053974027,0.0076655187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9700561,0.01191446,0.0010921073,0.0012220878,0.013243284,0.0024718845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010349708,0.00031253148,0.00085783616,0.0042050565,0.039568596,0.021103146,0.004570299,0.007972955,0.011047564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03944316,0.00084904785,0.00070116937,0.0064380444,0.020062272,0.0038219464,0.0050772517,0.010728541,0.0003462744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054763364,0.00004987122,0.014037704,0.00006342697,0.000039121678,0.00030123157,0.019046918,0.00090854167,0.00038600632,0.932769,0.020790985,0.011552293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019422891,0.00010873529,0.15130351,0.0009209197,0.0004977645,0.0002186817,0.10740769,0.005605357,0.0029667227,0.19279152,0.5374617,0.0005231079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9957475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21938276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21938276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.392744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90540534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123240813","doi":"","title":"Patterning Rights Constitutionalism: Thirty Years with the Charter","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Charter; Political science; Variety (cybernetics); Law; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; Democracy; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.01619015104397401,"score_gpt":0.24381005635812508,"score_spread":0.22761990531415108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123240813","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07331628,0.06054076,0.00848223,0.38235846,0.0041210256,0.000102362064,0.000308797,0.00012260601,0.4706476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8853082,0.017389065,0.0030744246,0.028596872,0.0011586862,0.000064748405,0.00014134639,0.00020116886,0.06406536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904113,0.0033158027,0.00019727826,0.0007479713,0.0030677016,0.0022600114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887283,0.0055611213,0.0004091931,0.0009997482,0.002826373,0.0014752322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013678615,0.00029793146,0.00045550714,0.0015611211,0.019878808,0.01658788,0.001485527,0.002923668,0.0055791843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01951573,0.00033865304,0.00028957496,0.0031139452,0.04665778,0.011926243,0.0063262987,0.009119977,0.00036216568],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017649856,0.000013838083,0.00043755176,0.000038630507,0.0000049935775,0.00012568665,0.034862123,0.00017529474,0.00011736218,0.9139358,0.031203195,0.019067861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012505188,0.000015403812,0.0012863323,0.00022984305,0.0000059527943,0.000054818243,0.021263534,0.00014694054,0.00024531689,0.11198406,0.864715,0.000040239018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6752599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.798121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9420197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057980273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06911253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6533051},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123294711","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2012.0021","title":"Electoral fairness and the law of democracy: A structural rights approach to judicial review","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.015573670904401118,"score_gpt":0.25021697575501783,"score_spread":0.2346433048506167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123294711","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025619386,0.020114785,0.343796,0.16461672,0.001502799,0.0008081596,0.0002568086,0.00028365295,0.44300163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9078582,0.0057955957,0.043868,0.009609838,0.0028656889,0.00060887117,0.000082391925,0.00010115224,0.029210206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94319844,0.030583913,0.002346734,0.005152891,0.013798823,0.004919198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9448429,0.03966188,0.0025669886,0.0042288913,0.007542159,0.0011570709],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06293812,0.000473515,0.001015597,0.0038392304,0.007765135,0.015200643,0.0030423168,0.009154584,0.0049083116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06941228,0.00076248427,0.0010747423,0.0027482938,0.029499846,0.010864758,0.004332631,0.009219274,0.0006407996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003353183,0.000005829023,0.000102484424,0.00001960278,0.0000045225793,0.000016002085,0.00038237186,0.0003831691,0.000045427074,0.9936051,0.0013788196,0.0040533952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003142663,0.000026525806,0.0003060826,0.000110908855,0.000013261582,0.00003510973,0.0001955455,0.0019074172,0.00021150749,0.95695454,0.040178366,0.000029297225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028348157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03826684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06293812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02286388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032499883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33285254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123315520","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1294","title":"Charter Values and Administrative Justice","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Public administration","score_opus":0.06732334647677912,"score_gpt":0.36161497194753944,"score_spread":0.2942916254707603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123315520","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03249639,0.0038968935,0.019027976,0.08090806,0.0008898585,0.00010276203,0.00014496027,0.00010644266,0.86242676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9619511,0.0013055403,0.006913864,0.0059305886,0.00021741458,0.00007739702,0.000055970075,0.00006207719,0.023486072],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97342265,0.009528389,0.0006088749,0.0018278941,0.009434609,0.0051775714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98081976,0.0060906196,0.0017263157,0.0023724101,0.0062433104,0.0027475308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019751212,0.00045878193,0.0006871131,0.0030369963,0.020717032,0.029261993,0.0022027893,0.004465918,0.0037194232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032330096,0.00040479412,0.0005576967,0.0035490405,0.08897107,0.009285525,0.0061456272,0.009216713,0.00040106635],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014917877,0.000002118665,0.00012587692,0.000004808198,9.843382e-7,0.0000059850518,0.0012873585,0.000067099914,0.000013485516,0.99525404,0.0014192405,0.0018176676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015033657,0.000022411708,0.0025858083,0.00021279619,0.000014285719,0.000039160775,0.0075272094,0.00050633674,0.00025801215,0.804989,0.18375944,0.00007054084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48555312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.60720694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9348612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06513881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.113278985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96545374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123325995","doi":"10.1016/j.ad.2022.12.004","title":"In Defence of the Courts: A Balanced Judicial Role in Canada's Constitutional Democracy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial activism; Democracy; Political science; Law; Judicial review; Power (physics); Balance (ability); Judicial restraint; Separation of powers; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.010140629026976109,"score_gpt":0.2447480423113869,"score_spread":0.2346074132844108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123325995","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17058887,0.0076781977,0.006870406,0.21196495,0.00043337757,0.00010770104,0.00023142561,0.00008304288,0.602042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734631,0.0013189844,0.0011859094,0.0066697383,0.000082908606,0.000024163171,0.000022910786,0.000016427375,0.017215915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98757046,0.0029832353,0.00022183807,0.0010185408,0.0048418115,0.0033642326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98637474,0.00520288,0.0006644717,0.0004115593,0.0048494255,0.0024969452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074839587,0.00023986494,0.00047080935,0.0017855596,0.023242364,0.016077269,0.0016526097,0.0036451262,0.005224421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017594859,0.00030202945,0.00026469675,0.0025997148,0.022800872,0.0026958995,0.0038399876,0.006274447,0.0003145387],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018884308,0.000013812523,0.0030895688,0.000046432207,0.000012628005,0.0001410827,0.013769018,0.0005894856,0.00042946273,0.9564342,0.0083809,0.017074624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016335178,0.000064212436,0.03903297,0.00082018785,0.00011581729,0.00019077917,0.047627795,0.003017851,0.001378898,0.3135716,0.593842,0.00017454535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96224916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.986937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91303253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08696744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24806398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63099587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123408160","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1258","title":"Dialogue Theory, Judicial Review, and Judicial Supremacy: A Comment on \"Charter Dialogue Revisted\"","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Terminology; Legislature; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Law; Judicial review; Epistemology; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.02761686577108724,"score_gpt":0.30469977527759967,"score_spread":0.27708290950651243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123408160","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004655798,0.01114946,0.002729148,0.9179544,0.0031354895,0.000019410483,0.00005250726,0.000049602062,0.06025427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44896716,0.006420771,0.0030077654,0.4895154,0.013983631,0.00021108273,0.00005354047,0.00013566522,0.03770506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.959956,0.025609065,0.00093462446,0.0025552076,0.0069875317,0.003957562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9459739,0.045056064,0.0019623279,0.0011438573,0.0047532716,0.0011105279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02924799,0.0005643702,0.0011602533,0.0019248484,0.02062837,0.016050559,0.0048026936,0.036104687,0.0040401435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054668162,0.00046093005,0.0012399147,0.0031212366,0.04899372,0.012206178,0.005065943,0.02455177,0.00053711253],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010843675,0.0000066392913,0.00005306965,0.00004984614,0.0000028050183,0.000102077975,0.0072523737,0.0001241045,0.000032348053,0.92381316,0.067161225,0.0013915318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008226387,0.00003543859,0.000812198,0.0006044879,0.000034434324,0.00014533049,0.011186735,0.0012717902,0.0004242486,0.47596768,0.5093201,0.000115213945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13316175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13192017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13316175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027453652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032821346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2647733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123473093","doi":"","title":"Freedom of Expression Adjudication in Europe and America: A Case Study in Comparative Constitutional Architecture","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Freedom of expression; Political science; Expression (computer science); Convention; Doctrine; Scrutiny; Law; Law and economics; Margin of appreciation; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.06735596951260585,"score_gpt":0.3763859665808876,"score_spread":0.3090299970682817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123473093","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77144986,0.004353205,0.0035333694,0.004829776,0.00008159486,0.00013846792,0.0000719147,0.000014682404,0.21552713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98850936,0.0015346357,0.0020070358,0.0008473632,0.000033916353,0.00009916742,0.000047485126,0.000014360678,0.0069067236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875942,0.008840123,0.00030289826,0.0005706929,0.00093083887,0.0017611989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875301,0.010245763,0.00046192412,0.00061010337,0.0007230924,0.00042901622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012553152,0.00028008543,0.0006553168,0.0038809667,0.016027177,0.008732975,0.0017656308,0.00717908,0.0026784344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015666118,0.00039446147,0.0006101618,0.00979244,0.017081203,0.0062547363,0.0071839043,0.0052965563,0.00017707644],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014268424,0.0003624555,0.011947295,0.000093409035,0.000023478942,0.0045365267,0.08133758,0.00096216897,0.0005123799,0.87437594,0.0030559357,0.022650197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021723779,0.0004455755,0.04553112,0.0010156195,0.00011444853,0.0047502136,0.33659437,0.0036012076,0.0018774347,0.17566676,0.43004045,0.00014560335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07466065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12953533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07466065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014461689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048557394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14845216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123493448","doi":"","title":"Constitutionalising the Senate: A Modest Democratic Proposal","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Constitution; Democracy; Political science; Democratic legitimacy; House of Commons; Legitimacy; Law; Ideal (ethics); Separation of powers; Order (exchange); Referendum; Legislation; Law and economics; Power (physics); Sociology; Parliament; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.029111258577923595,"score_gpt":0.296868661474127,"score_spread":0.2677574028962034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123493448","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036167677,0.0075378404,0.048680305,0.37737277,0.0062776115,0.00039769214,0.00030793698,0.00021708958,0.52304107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8187761,0.0030810663,0.019234017,0.07131095,0.0036225533,0.00075293734,0.00011245485,0.00011474207,0.08299529],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9777313,0.012460391,0.00081664685,0.0026589187,0.003851751,0.0024808808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889227,0.0054774797,0.0003372232,0.0019861127,0.0023754612,0.00090101216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03187874,0.00066943467,0.0007559115,0.0017925841,0.013502366,0.012098032,0.0020766044,0.011518178,0.004814059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031828646,0.0006125216,0.0011364331,0.0014905228,0.034665592,0.009675177,0.009031271,0.020497225,0.0012767268],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060715374,0.0000046672294,0.000039587398,0.000008573336,0.0000024484343,0.000021160042,0.00042385378,0.000101553676,0.000055260814,0.9966101,0.0017204774,0.001006284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006399728,0.00004836484,0.0003816752,0.00015647257,0.00003525005,0.00008785681,0.00084440573,0.00093445485,0.00070261164,0.7538639,0.24282165,0.000059367354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036043968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045511898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036043968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011755619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027209427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16859293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123508446","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1285","title":"The Bungling of Justice Nadon’s Appointment to the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Nomination; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Parliament; Politics; Chose; Government (linguistics); Supreme Court Decisions; Political question; Majority opinion","score_opus":0.030005130473400515,"score_gpt":0.289306940117719,"score_spread":0.2593018096443185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123508446","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07275601,0.016333342,0.00276838,0.5452978,0.009953831,0.00011663654,0.0004335107,0.00009442319,0.35224602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7151321,0.0038629468,0.00093032053,0.100887425,0.00080607453,0.0000307857,0.00006250473,0.00006009663,0.17822766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933735,0.00089399255,0.00010652422,0.0009006305,0.0026670806,0.002058225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99511516,0.001432096,0.00014134253,0.00011908479,0.002426418,0.0007659571],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033368417,0.00022251096,0.00038656816,0.0008475561,0.028081607,0.0076158494,0.0012725216,0.005870011,0.0029654386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0139307985,0.00040066856,0.00033602346,0.001024509,0.007278627,0.0014775265,0.0016295051,0.009274868,0.00027542378],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060235543,0.00002115003,0.0031169755,0.000089331,0.00003695113,0.0014277892,0.013926182,0.0003036143,0.0007965406,0.5900192,0.36863756,0.021564495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012613894,0.00002122725,0.0048750187,0.00013479956,0.00002694744,0.00016073714,0.0060528885,0.0003461906,0.00082761736,0.01318931,0.97426593,0.00008667819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97398573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.988347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07236614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07236614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10422487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5250555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123633480","doi":"","title":"Sharpening the Dialogue Debate: The Next Decade of Scholarship","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Humanities; Political science; Constitution; Constitutionality; Charter; Legislature; Interpretation (philosophy); Scholarship; Relation (database); Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.07500833982761843,"score_gpt":0.3243688705626575,"score_spread":0.24936053073503908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123633480","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013462314,0.44612548,0.0039813058,0.43642274,0.007831723,0.000017655433,0.00005774304,0.000058835227,0.09204213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5725541,0.28831133,0.0030466197,0.093865484,0.023679877,0.00016696543,0.00013041569,0.00014459,0.01810072],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9818271,0.012549109,0.0005175826,0.0015156593,0.0018306948,0.0017599217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9575278,0.03603113,0.0015296901,0.0013845117,0.0019679042,0.0015590411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017400391,0.0006131939,0.0015621834,0.0057010506,0.011717579,0.030692806,0.0030128963,0.016778393,0.009573644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022566956,0.0004972149,0.0008034445,0.008485625,0.06268905,0.039906118,0.009846128,0.01733814,0.0011388178],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027262386,0.00004165462,0.00016855393,0.00053098705,0.000007239579,0.000092483766,0.035274904,0.0000961182,0.000060763552,0.92777425,0.010521097,0.025404707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002213691,0.000036823156,0.00051299203,0.0037219045,0.00001323389,0.00015025388,0.080447935,0.00029739266,0.00013548453,0.44756573,0.46706793,0.000028183042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009795178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010026048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030692806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018336358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01895509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13304019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123733520","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3037","title":"Dead Hands, Living Trees, Historic Compromises: The Senate Reform and Supreme Court Act References Bring the Originalism Debate to Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Supreme court; Law; Constitution; Politics; Democracy; Political science; Sociology; Dissenting opinion; Judicial review","score_opus":0.028590388946844566,"score_gpt":0.2558691430185515,"score_spread":0.22727875407170695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123733520","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14512554,0.009880151,0.0015225294,0.14546873,0.0006031525,0.000028231872,0.00024071401,0.00003394516,0.69709706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97001994,0.0023714365,0.00025290062,0.007671165,0.00014880807,0.0000087576955,0.000036973954,0.000028817376,0.019461177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99421906,0.0014048982,0.00009676229,0.0005021411,0.0018196275,0.0019575155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99263096,0.0029896202,0.00041960686,0.00039452902,0.0026331588,0.00093209906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045436416,0.00025653688,0.0004753511,0.0017872526,0.038919386,0.015214883,0.0018994043,0.004998761,0.0058297515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013226214,0.0003110651,0.000344878,0.0040337383,0.0449517,0.003891986,0.004035074,0.008578478,0.00023597018],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013863061,0.00000835026,0.0014446281,0.000024403049,0.00000867644,0.00014743852,0.030077867,0.00024021222,0.00006861054,0.94615316,0.014756006,0.007056813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034550638,0.000023241948,0.017064087,0.0006545529,0.000096637756,0.00014848576,0.098449126,0.0009855307,0.0006560478,0.18707547,0.69465786,0.00015437634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9776135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99100363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8542765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14572352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13765168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9908396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123795090","doi":"10.29173/alr79","title":"&lt;i&gt;R. v. N.S.&lt;/i&gt;: What is Fair in a Trial? The Supreme Court of Canada's Divided Opinion on the Niqab in the Courtroom","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.033681144788722576,"score_gpt":0.282735538016959,"score_spread":0.24905439322823641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123795090","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026536027,0.012393018,0.0013013097,0.30636433,0.0022623218,0.0001691226,0.0016729533,0.000121108314,0.6491798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52095383,0.0074133324,0.0024262508,0.16528226,0.00096682867,0.00019555831,0.00063348754,0.00014906038,0.3019794],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900463,0.0012077045,0.0003478975,0.0005718947,0.0038004792,0.0040257433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991405,0.0037982294,0.00028875985,0.00020222072,0.003098799,0.0012070504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009148604,0.00047538689,0.00075911084,0.0016153737,0.020388834,0.00953094,0.0029261934,0.011543161,0.01098372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024042625,0.00055653794,0.0005515079,0.0021246772,0.007996993,0.0028306798,0.0016125382,0.00989811,0.0016537406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010952869,0.000042980824,0.003598538,0.0001532633,0.000028635852,0.00042516258,0.0034329845,0.00024542282,0.00041303973,0.4764314,0.49838293,0.016736051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019825484,0.00007906328,0.024911812,0.0014389461,0.00026234135,0.00023965468,0.011438536,0.0014376149,0.002017761,0.118368514,0.83932555,0.0002819877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95544845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98572844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05213386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05213386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13572094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37825936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123801536","doi":"","title":"Measuring Judicial Activism on the SupremeCourt of Canada: A Comment onNewfoundland (Treasury Board) v. NAPE","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treasury; Political science; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.05662370584923329,"score_gpt":0.2501783787137477,"score_spread":0.19355467286451442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123801536","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40948707,0.0067729475,0.0024666027,0.2701373,0.0010297762,0.00038727396,0.009165891,0.00013749892,0.30041564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9355409,0.0014516502,0.0020503923,0.02907512,0.00026782596,0.000112499925,0.0011509088,0.00007603716,0.030274771],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98235095,0.0017087393,0.0005888009,0.0012192038,0.010383125,0.0037491603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9462154,0.018575097,0.0036587769,0.0012445572,0.02626087,0.004045346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0083782775,0.0005740922,0.0006483646,0.003968022,0.022312982,0.010150911,0.0033388867,0.0047337287,0.005194856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06020153,0.00047185956,0.0006234712,0.01165802,0.006824727,0.002487307,0.0021847873,0.0056490074,0.0004376754],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002652948,0.00016015893,0.35658324,0.00035976424,0.00026924998,0.00035332228,0.036783513,0.0014317485,0.0010432919,0.10770357,0.43580127,0.059245605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064730564,0.00009594827,0.70888245,0.0006970757,0.00040421588,0.000083476014,0.05119633,0.0013994096,0.0044700806,0.0057164747,0.22678904,0.0002007974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99571806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10517562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10517562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1408337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7631061},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123989408","doi":"10.3138/9781487514662-003","title":"1. Introduction: Courts in Federal Countries","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Jurisprudence; Government (linguistics); Law; Public administration; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.025375998151703952,"score_gpt":0.23860930382614323,"score_spread":0.21323330567443927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123989408","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018734267,0.033035025,0.0009849488,0.005819562,0.0016586026,0.000025340909,0.0001815956,0.00005813296,0.95636344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09984005,0.061168868,0.0019945465,0.007490079,0.003929288,0.00008286963,0.0006368719,0.000137627,0.8247197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996655,0.000097137825,0.000016517624,0.000047188612,0.00012349398,0.000050208262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964213,0.00019698023,0.000021259262,0.000034232642,0.00008002148,0.000025402787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029552093,0.00030532942,0.00023575743,0.0013331479,0.0025834662,0.003414119,0.0005042845,0.0011795256,0.02856251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079520576,0.00015233588,0.00024152116,0.002460563,0.0020492228,0.0023185804,0.00081393257,0.0021201496,0.00509286],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005405471,0.000019439321,0.00017700708,0.00012504631,0.0000012001251,0.000060756658,0.0022841706,0.00021602625,0.000093953524,0.6807066,0.2762046,0.04010571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.603808e-7,0.0000042957417,0.0002509865,0.00022165263,8.470159e-7,0.000064194865,0.00030482296,0.00004497216,0.000037002508,0.023731032,0.9753365,0.0000025734282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007079029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008739772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02856251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002502099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001890826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09555113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124025184","doi":"","title":"Canadian Election Administration on Trial: ‘Robocalls’, Opitz and Disputed Elections in the Courts","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Jurisprudence; Administration (probate law); Theme (computing); Law","score_opus":0.01496922481542144,"score_gpt":0.2864169551060437,"score_spread":0.27144773029062225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124025184","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23087421,0.020152869,0.001981035,0.2096936,0.0011063335,0.00011428819,0.00039132303,0.000054359698,0.535632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96180177,0.0032820443,0.00047725145,0.012160324,0.000194824,0.000031608717,0.000066284134,0.00002568734,0.021960184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9835187,0.0023923991,0.00028669843,0.0011183863,0.0070296344,0.0056542177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897441,0.0037283842,0.00089870254,0.0004703539,0.003294528,0.0018638659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008814512,0.00030169706,0.00062498264,0.0030460923,0.035787474,0.01670728,0.0028904248,0.00625564,0.0054975925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032192416,0.00041225206,0.00046090633,0.0056965547,0.025287658,0.0034262356,0.005622158,0.008764449,0.00039757448],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004638147,0.000025721372,0.0062555987,0.00008996729,0.000019320369,0.0005838201,0.023466904,0.00039603014,0.000190482,0.9071384,0.039072987,0.022714278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009727353,0.000059956266,0.052951347,0.00062458584,0.00011130321,0.00043484688,0.057355795,0.0016392538,0.0006487203,0.0898321,0.795912,0.00033272445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98511815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.994375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86173105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13826896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17632572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99948585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124087504","doi":"","title":"Breakdowns in the Democratic Process and the Law of Canadian Democracy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Politics; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01718445039640144,"score_gpt":0.253409698441378,"score_spread":0.23622524804497658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124087504","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08377329,0.004673563,0.021734076,0.037615545,0.00035000013,0.00017318646,0.0004943608,0.00016790339,0.85101813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95939124,0.0014584279,0.0044593476,0.0016007671,0.00006937101,0.00006074659,0.000109964516,0.000038410002,0.03281164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98890054,0.0013489936,0.00027555594,0.0014006682,0.0045986515,0.0034757212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953242,0.001088227,0.0004618406,0.00048261054,0.0019729221,0.0006702275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038891085,0.0004021784,0.00042707333,0.0027977896,0.020006,0.00986357,0.001356303,0.0020347123,0.006136373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010924342,0.00037136968,0.0005615148,0.0033681886,0.029088508,0.0036317587,0.0038053996,0.0055633234,0.00033841582],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049713067,0.0000019326294,0.00040525472,0.000011218055,0.000002195887,0.000028443934,0.0017200339,0.00041472897,0.00004801285,0.99197054,0.0015138529,0.0038787848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005166122,0.000017730437,0.009153678,0.00024514517,0.000038373426,0.00011744765,0.005874915,0.0046032215,0.00058112724,0.6590077,0.32021213,0.00009682951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9655244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9686882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13927808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13927808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.116110004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124169780","doi":"","title":"Judicial Review and American Constitutional Exceptionalism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Exceptionalism; Political science; Judicial activism; Law; Accountability; Politics; Judicial restraint; Constitutional law; Constitutional review; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03989409783912067,"score_gpt":0.3084262071484708,"score_spread":0.2685321093093501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124169780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16589066,0.008369623,0.008459112,0.09075173,0.00065781217,0.00002709939,0.00012884785,0.00014287996,0.7255723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98684597,0.0009815189,0.0007583946,0.0046112365,0.0004659609,0.00002323267,0.000028091326,0.000013244547,0.0062723574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98892283,0.004517435,0.00043855232,0.0018362105,0.0023530293,0.0019319016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902593,0.004772045,0.0014736726,0.0010561323,0.0015889601,0.0008499099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010070289,0.0001236523,0.00051194965,0.0021008083,0.009520525,0.007807954,0.0006963378,0.0028281033,0.0025341325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01376909,0.00023921883,0.00034876898,0.0016428917,0.019751761,0.0029785198,0.0045425547,0.004166023,0.00023319523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043653927,0.000004787505,0.000475428,0.000008558426,0.000003289281,0.00003905412,0.0005907909,0.00011108754,0.00003923611,0.9933884,0.0020080856,0.003326936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026088486,0.000019568595,0.0035622995,0.00008665433,0.00001732607,0.00021717914,0.00083767,0.00068116665,0.00022360968,0.8537991,0.14050016,0.000029076069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011326114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014766491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011326114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00695748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068438556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053257465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124186641","doi":"","title":"Justiciability and the \"Political Question\" Doctrine","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Presumption; Judicial review; Doctrine; Law; Political science; Politics; Parliament; Political question; Discretion; Plaintiff; Law and economics; Scope (computer science); Sociology","score_opus":0.007520437106566744,"score_gpt":0.2927826751554695,"score_spread":0.28526223804890277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124186641","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044387627,0.01026152,0.050630637,0.12971969,0.002277657,0.00017030227,0.000087138724,0.00007713337,0.7623883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.952695,0.0023027267,0.0030582417,0.015188361,0.0024610248,0.0002257026,0.00006510447,0.00006044959,0.023943406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97727543,0.010965651,0.0011592048,0.0031461008,0.0053602355,0.0020934737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9492292,0.038453154,0.003483909,0.003794393,0.0039494336,0.001089976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017086592,0.0003844742,0.0007368157,0.0015102819,0.006092368,0.011298909,0.0016828465,0.008243841,0.0052666496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04149103,0.00041431378,0.0006924259,0.0012195058,0.04202084,0.011069191,0.005116158,0.010233353,0.00088994385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034955815,0.000002533257,0.000059821858,0.000010610606,0.0000015783311,0.000019395382,0.00046770897,0.000034749355,0.000030045197,0.99779737,0.0006442512,0.0009284266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020017187,0.000014470321,0.00031330157,0.0000575417,0.0000057065577,0.0000583766,0.0002639744,0.00018049878,0.00017099765,0.9518544,0.047050424,0.000010394519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027898785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018329587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017086592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038425948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057246904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09036362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124242788","doi":"","title":"The Hidden Foreign Law Debate in Heller: The Proportionality Approach in American Constitutional Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital USD (University of San Diego)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Proportionality (law); Constitutional law; Political science; Comparative law; Common law; Adjudication; Public law; Legal history","score_opus":0.021548053123450026,"score_gpt":0.233799701140664,"score_spread":0.21225164801721397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124242788","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.113461405,0.010253546,0.048201185,0.18550809,0.0013136044,0.000027131655,0.000032010088,0.00009470818,0.64110833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96980333,0.0013880486,0.0027059389,0.01174614,0.0004771499,0.000022423972,0.000006506583,0.00003280612,0.013817599],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99417335,0.0040855124,0.00010357965,0.0005392017,0.0006617712,0.00043656892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962245,0.0029987227,0.0001649694,0.0002401323,0.0002245146,0.0001471242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009068079,0.00025733796,0.00036460345,0.001713713,0.006797046,0.009652172,0.00076196564,0.0036623024,0.0021071115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010417562,0.00021860443,0.00029497372,0.0015077349,0.031905834,0.011520935,0.004286075,0.0062472154,0.000177581],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025825286,0.0000018342479,0.000041605395,0.0000028453637,5.243784e-7,0.000014595303,0.0017699477,0.000040100298,0.000020110232,0.9956357,0.00067455275,0.001795681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011776274,0.000012345043,0.000294857,0.00008089659,0.0000055396677,0.000071272356,0.003868996,0.0004589238,0.00023711233,0.9218889,0.073054284,0.000015206559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008871707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009968655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009652172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005906372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030452225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047957182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124335097","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3291","title":"Strategic Behaviour and Leadership Patterns of Modern Chief Justices","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Supreme court; Voting; Charter; Scholarship; Roberts Court; Political science; Ideology; Period (music); Economic Justice; Law; Task (project management); Majority opinion; Sociology; Management; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.1492124309405392,"score_gpt":0.31797611920990937,"score_spread":0.16876368826937016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124335097","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.995824,0.00005994848,0.000084184176,0.0001805961,0.0000033223482,0.000004688422,0.000037964506,0.000002958059,0.0038023859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980305,0.0000414937,0.00006952228,0.000042086438,0.000004296658,0.0000024609055,0.000036400936,0.0000014976366,0.0017717297],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933237,0.00010077859,0.000019268795,0.000094610354,0.00021266694,0.00024023058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969253,0.00032110166,0.0010317236,0.00009257398,0.00076330476,0.00086605974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072412397,0.00008506238,0.00010498895,0.0012856433,0.0020953682,0.001095868,0.00039230162,0.00029465946,0.0026222938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003991645,0.000121496465,0.00006964407,0.0010148436,0.0012435208,0.00043747886,0.00071831385,0.0005130219,0.00032146196],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063739455,0.00008423788,0.9094462,0.000023880262,0.00001819579,0.00037642752,0.048538495,0.00018276999,0.0023708143,0.0021154138,0.0020892227,0.03469057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019006297,0.000037697755,0.97773474,0.000007773987,0.000001596923,0.000070040056,0.016698817,0.00011948317,0.00014350223,0.00020397881,0.004969197,0.000011309273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14621969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4624703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14621969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027205728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017775699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29073715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124443418","doi":"","title":"Ideological Influences on Governance and Regulation: The Comparative Case of Supreme Courts","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Deference; Supreme court; Corporate governance; Politics; Political science; Separation of powers; Law; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.030273688383477076,"score_gpt":0.3100675920895012,"score_spread":0.2797939037060241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124443418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77107203,0.0018931797,0.0020223549,0.0072898814,0.000039502716,0.0000222991,0.0000378332,0.0000050226668,0.21761794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980502,0.00026311973,0.00017374077,0.00021936957,0.000024208548,0.000005546089,0.000006581322,0.0000023914158,0.0012548217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99529284,0.00268225,0.00006584471,0.00027304134,0.0006365634,0.001049394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99122393,0.005722742,0.0009854642,0.00053834723,0.0008645306,0.00066505454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067401486,0.00011964592,0.00036260614,0.0016425006,0.0050528473,0.0053877532,0.000765413,0.0017397568,0.003569805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012667132,0.0001322108,0.00036088473,0.0015952543,0.010023309,0.0025681672,0.0024444573,0.002928224,0.00015676607],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008618021,0.00007832443,0.015748786,0.00003718071,0.000030558243,0.000995587,0.013738045,0.0015260201,0.00041560183,0.9570136,0.0013881259,0.00894187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002566952,0.0002318526,0.1920678,0.00036571146,0.0002042571,0.0008043358,0.061225206,0.011787716,0.0019221834,0.6480933,0.082917206,0.0001237904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02941082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0452151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02941082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056596585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023474065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05847925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124474087","doi":"10.1017/s0021223715000187","title":"The Canadian Override: Constitutional Model or<i>Bête Noire</i>of Constitutional Politics?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Knesset; Supreme court; Legitimacy; Politics; Political science; Law; Legislature; Section (typography); Law and economics; Sociology; Parliament","score_opus":0.05925652900322724,"score_gpt":0.3300560492398081,"score_spread":0.2707995202365808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124474087","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030565321,0.04875343,0.0027720048,0.21290974,0.0013077869,0.000047311834,0.0002562918,0.00006339705,0.70332474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89869153,0.02058269,0.0017231441,0.02522802,0.0004140907,0.000023994819,0.00010651359,0.000052393214,0.05317778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942272,0.0008399554,0.000076846736,0.0004992443,0.0026950454,0.00166181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99666995,0.0009971038,0.00014479639,0.00015435604,0.0015334402,0.0005003354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041226274,0.00034902792,0.00037942687,0.0017027939,0.010602083,0.011034371,0.001936102,0.00363575,0.0050393306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00729869,0.00021703022,0.00027877124,0.0028281251,0.023556387,0.0033565338,0.0014238043,0.0054606185,0.00029982522],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007538783,0.000004757258,0.0005409689,0.000050708626,0.000004651189,0.000060219198,0.0020076798,0.00011878683,0.00007335391,0.9680466,0.020168087,0.008916608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003355696,0.000022031214,0.008975715,0.00064404175,0.000053638858,0.00026075845,0.014991353,0.0008921567,0.00053888944,0.14053522,0.8329416,0.00011103021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9723794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98270214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89640564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10359438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.126696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75163335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124490563","doi":"","title":"Reducing the Democratic Deficit: Representation, Diversity and the Canadian Judiciary or Towards a 'Triple P' Judiciary","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Politics; Judicial independence; Diversity (politics); Law; Judicial discretion; Statute; Judicial review; Democratic deficit; Representation (politics); Judicial activism; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.022497020180617083,"score_gpt":0.2709536953357629,"score_spread":0.24845667515514583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124490563","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22160688,0.009130755,0.010821102,0.17893998,0.0005316202,0.00009716987,0.0002511893,0.0000752902,0.578546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816976,0.0012429212,0.0011215962,0.0039288457,0.00017420555,0.000014203949,0.000038272443,0.000015544845,0.011766739],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902874,0.0016547806,0.00012340082,0.0004807358,0.003907713,0.0035459676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932448,0.0022177487,0.0010593387,0.00042998185,0.001677542,0.0013705102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048387297,0.00027505585,0.00044128892,0.0022180637,0.0119946245,0.0077951015,0.0019028336,0.0017505375,0.004207383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015218227,0.00018217717,0.00034524512,0.0036690612,0.019973272,0.00390976,0.0036502958,0.0032813342,0.00027390415],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023422836,0.000016237991,0.0033553361,0.000032792537,0.00000850571,0.00005182157,0.0057107364,0.0005279825,0.00013797186,0.9581235,0.009294087,0.022717565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008049031,0.00009980983,0.06301752,0.00047519983,0.00007492812,0.00015760126,0.023173383,0.004905577,0.0007607331,0.5944819,0.31266245,0.00011046309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8603362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92193335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9410176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058982365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06422248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.427949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124562826","doi":"","title":"Positive Obligations Under Sections 15 And 7 Of The Charter: A Comment On Gosselin V. Québec","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Constitutionality; Legitimacy; Entitlement (fair division); Political science; Jurisprudence; Law; Minor (academic); Law and economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.024205134302937838,"score_gpt":0.2784689327453998,"score_spread":0.25426379844246194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124562826","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040035073,0.008467525,0.0011288478,0.7983868,0.0029896132,0.00013216202,0.0005430158,0.00010015809,0.14821684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3921628,0.0036522464,0.0011978544,0.5401183,0.0020097424,0.00017105372,0.0001368598,0.000093313276,0.06045793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865784,0.0031277996,0.00051999255,0.0012263899,0.004758533,0.003788863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9770551,0.014484471,0.00079129037,0.00052142405,0.0058380375,0.0013097072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016921394,0.00058764184,0.0009353631,0.0012792831,0.02710938,0.009653818,0.004799996,0.032794278,0.0035572434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025209213,0.0008087545,0.0014719919,0.0017524185,0.0136121325,0.0028132494,0.0024491246,0.020843003,0.00045678177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000120684344,0.00005228077,0.0043141125,0.00018938263,0.00005431225,0.0028495688,0.018809747,0.00081428187,0.0012327366,0.57478267,0.3889231,0.007857043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018015652,0.000090824025,0.022795582,0.0010300691,0.00020832419,0.0005923371,0.016283486,0.0018753039,0.0017040984,0.054248665,0.90048003,0.000511134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96243614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98073524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07508107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07508107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10369011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54475385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124590460","doi":"","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada Crumbles Mr. Christie's Cookie","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Taxpayer; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Charter; Appeal; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.01639240125532161,"score_gpt":0.26067066381317694,"score_spread":0.24427826255785534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124590460","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031546235,0.013083682,0.0020871304,0.3530639,0.0057043387,0.00021660881,0.002586774,0.0003861223,0.5913252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22634175,0.0046706623,0.001932093,0.21750338,0.0006109798,0.000118978875,0.000640868,0.00017090201,0.54801035],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99443936,0.00023889139,0.0001156418,0.0006163109,0.0024333391,0.002156563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966382,0.00074307894,0.00007472166,0.00010018888,0.001780852,0.00066297175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002176836,0.00062960584,0.00073022983,0.0012416164,0.035400454,0.008033864,0.00238124,0.011399639,0.013815283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008007356,0.0009408591,0.0007282659,0.0014781562,0.004802814,0.0016593538,0.002350278,0.013968592,0.0017433745],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003440651,0.00001728643,0.0020838066,0.000054277287,0.000018306333,0.0006542763,0.0020266755,0.00020334825,0.00037271215,0.20717444,0.77317715,0.014183347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025522377,0.000016910963,0.0042281323,0.00022138737,0.0000457558,0.00012732208,0.0022326368,0.0004000249,0.00043728543,0.008812957,0.9833512,0.00010087703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9886904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9257164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07428357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16931635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53896755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124660054","doi":"10.1017/s002058931100042x","title":"INTERNATIONALISATION AND CONSTITUTIONAL BORROWING IN DRAFTING BILLS OF RIGHTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Centre for Engineering Research and Development; Government of the United Kingdom","keywords":"Indigenous; Internationalization; Context (archaeology); Political science; Key (lock); Northern ireland; Indigenous rights; Law and economics; Human rights; Focus (optics); Law; Public administration; Sociology; Business; International trade; Geography; Computer science; Ethnology","score_opus":0.08964935228637383,"score_gpt":0.32107300415363627,"score_spread":0.23142365186726244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124660054","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30177835,0.0014998858,0.025772775,0.011485276,0.00013079192,0.00019443476,0.000041360337,0.00006339104,0.6590338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896151,0.00020130217,0.0019984015,0.00028859163,0.000024695419,0.000036766283,0.000012730723,0.000030408171,0.0077920537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96113837,0.025182279,0.0015630873,0.0024842464,0.005840733,0.0037913409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94012487,0.04210774,0.0044629886,0.006605961,0.0053518796,0.0013465263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044168185,0.00023061222,0.0004917268,0.0024335715,0.011564508,0.0100487685,0.0019155017,0.0024006525,0.0054237735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07625385,0.00044806566,0.00031601332,0.002745574,0.04429501,0.006017298,0.006980616,0.006144294,0.00031817303],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019364394,0.000023800536,0.002635277,0.000051141964,0.0000064608666,0.00034319525,0.10338669,0.00051153626,0.0004999399,0.8732493,0.0012678918,0.018005356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005440204,0.0001576779,0.022188773,0.0010841236,0.000043094453,0.0009655544,0.21338312,0.0024633897,0.00252215,0.34468168,0.41231248,0.00014357669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040550746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04756338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044168185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01719156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01256053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23358649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124689136","doi":"","title":"Travelling in Constitutional Circles: The Paradox of Tribunal Independence","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Separation of powers; Independence (probability theory); Judicial independence; Sociology; Constitution; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03010718239465562,"score_gpt":0.26895739826666126,"score_spread":0.23885021587200564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124689136","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22815196,0.005659491,0.02840788,0.1982578,0.0005517777,0.00009513061,0.00014358363,0.00011794693,0.5386144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800253,0.0009176142,0.0022757014,0.009224245,0.0002738504,0.000048337875,0.00003241036,0.00006381987,0.0071387477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98346543,0.0072455555,0.00043439804,0.00198733,0.004352139,0.002515241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96840334,0.02093479,0.0016479668,0.002651558,0.0036957422,0.0026665702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01565504,0.0002834804,0.001022564,0.0028258357,0.017787213,0.01828035,0.002970431,0.009521999,0.005085499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043931425,0.0006846837,0.0008601676,0.0028579726,0.067213565,0.017352315,0.010623869,0.016235001,0.00068672554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010200553,0.000010444085,0.00030561382,0.000012099289,0.000004281966,0.00016355178,0.006898766,0.00016799603,0.000062478925,0.9861128,0.0024688109,0.0037830179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050685554,0.000009991997,0.0007929015,0.000056604356,0.0000096852855,0.00010022551,0.007898205,0.0007390059,0.00015803573,0.9610013,0.029150138,0.000033181324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059082545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043417882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059082545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014931128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014366366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1174773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124702976","doi":"","title":"Structure, Substance and Spirit: Lessons in Constitutional Architecture from the Senate Reform Reference","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional law; Political science; Architecture; Meaning (existential); Constitutional theory; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.0988614719397214,"score_gpt":0.3319382043452743,"score_spread":0.23307673240555293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124702976","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13236934,0.015870139,0.048528954,0.14657463,0.00078916503,0.00006820903,0.00018778292,0.00013766847,0.65547407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9746627,0.0037434842,0.0048467065,0.003628809,0.00020352086,0.000036620324,0.000051087343,0.000060011207,0.0127669545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928847,0.0046122167,0.00017044108,0.00045326594,0.0013192295,0.00056010816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928093,0.004553533,0.00027222783,0.0008696009,0.0012718868,0.00022341742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007586936,0.00028928302,0.00048249547,0.0021168413,0.006457169,0.008423386,0.0014272192,0.002637396,0.0034820258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013862853,0.00035672451,0.00037490923,0.003052491,0.04497818,0.009518205,0.003957867,0.006447171,0.00025829463],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002222703,0.0000014718333,0.00011047319,0.000011396319,0.00000185069,0.00004141101,0.004771686,0.00017880101,0.00002288943,0.99007905,0.00071251043,0.0040662815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012370054,0.000022172608,0.0012382979,0.00023314195,0.000014018096,0.00008617356,0.010227071,0.0007042265,0.00032924753,0.82055926,0.166538,0.00003589211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16196203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2033693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83803797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017211309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015178845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3220386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124704963","doi":"","title":"Extending Charter Benefits to Canada’s Poor","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Politics; Supreme court; Realm; State (computer science); Constitution; Law; Social rights; Legislature; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02560256823575199,"score_gpt":0.29796505611606483,"score_spread":0.27236248788031286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124704963","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10740597,0.004794966,0.0021404848,0.23742329,0.00087635964,0.00012579883,0.0008671403,0.000121078476,0.6462448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88727176,0.0036564092,0.0021435842,0.03520387,0.00034556864,0.000061014613,0.0001616889,0.00004782082,0.07110826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99512225,0.00053754303,0.000060275754,0.00021682298,0.0014968807,0.0025662368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929461,0.0018145503,0.0002658914,0.00044761167,0.0025297636,0.0019961186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004811661,0.00021009393,0.0002844241,0.0019219111,0.022304116,0.006979714,0.0012334008,0.0032303098,0.008750565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011609415,0.00024533464,0.00029184547,0.0020642704,0.0071947724,0.0019075748,0.0045413496,0.003647624,0.00030877755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055484918,0.00004515032,0.008065905,0.000091111746,0.000012804602,0.0005500871,0.0117698405,0.0011241537,0.00037274536,0.734777,0.19422846,0.048907287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035817313,0.000039506085,0.020911949,0.00031089995,0.000029333522,0.00014583702,0.009274746,0.00075086375,0.00033836477,0.045013767,0.9230764,0.000072497874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.965678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99020493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06440389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06440389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1829599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4672851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124724754","doi":"","title":"The Supreme Court and the New Judicial Independence","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial independence; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Lawmaking; Judicial activism; Separation of powers; Judicial review; Certiorari; Legitimacy; Legislature; Parliament; Judicial opinion; Independence (probability theory); Original jurisdiction; Politics","score_opus":0.013391103463444841,"score_gpt":0.27226323225304316,"score_spread":0.2588721287895983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124724754","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14038906,0.0061917575,0.005484882,0.069873385,0.0005335076,0.000027285188,0.00005776446,0.000032675318,0.7774097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820826,0.00079486915,0.00062853063,0.0035008832,0.00038462548,0.000015511618,0.00002077458,0.00001535352,0.012556942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908852,0.003122773,0.00024634085,0.0010293777,0.003038224,0.0016781741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99305046,0.003723779,0.000569416,0.00068751856,0.0011245627,0.00084422313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064693037,0.00016428037,0.00039265666,0.0014697383,0.009894466,0.010328601,0.0010161279,0.0032276975,0.003920875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010417325,0.00036669266,0.00034069462,0.001163975,0.049182016,0.0064068167,0.006236697,0.011600691,0.00039572848],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003983289,0.000005711455,0.00019671943,0.0000032492774,0.0000014798028,0.000045766323,0.0020063533,0.00004515994,0.00004422219,0.99503654,0.0009716295,0.0016391403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007871362,0.000030630876,0.00472809,0.0001779094,0.0000156143,0.00021048149,0.004223753,0.00052643986,0.0003024662,0.7944274,0.19523373,0.000044813114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028633427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038115434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028633427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011941188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013497877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08663982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124884951","doi":"","title":"Law's Ambition and the Reconstruction of Role Moralityin Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; International law","score_opus":0.011589309574514189,"score_gpt":0.23826144138111421,"score_spread":0.22667213180660004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124884951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2393153,0.0018615648,0.0022472988,0.07249776,0.00026785283,0.000073162046,0.00031491206,0.00004836075,0.68337375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9547553,0.0003397177,0.00036527534,0.0018617274,0.000021178541,0.00001305784,0.000031625797,0.000030733565,0.042581446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99214584,0.0012897175,0.000100381585,0.0007088801,0.0016787898,0.0040764315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99388254,0.0012365085,0.0002469237,0.00031193008,0.0026669095,0.0016552792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047777225,0.0002651724,0.0006566622,0.0021084202,0.038217813,0.017017242,0.0027804729,0.004996314,0.016378056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013621656,0.00044344223,0.0004310464,0.003761761,0.031773303,0.0036896192,0.0048742425,0.007071753,0.00048762676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003310879,0.000019475778,0.00279064,0.000017541537,0.0000072277735,0.00008271228,0.013641308,0.000359537,0.000085894295,0.96608114,0.009446845,0.007434613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009744066,0.00004701244,0.033022054,0.00026001802,0.00005714218,0.00011345368,0.089888684,0.0029300635,0.0006755242,0.3840449,0.48871323,0.00015045975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99074847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99571556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18581875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18581875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26501814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94433486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124905978","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1100","title":"The End of Umpire?: Federalism and Judicial Restraint","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Supreme court; Ultra vires; Law; Political science; Constitution; Judicial review; Jurisdiction; Statute; Justiciability; Separation of powers; Legislature; Legislation; Jurisprudence; Original jurisdiction; Federal jurisdiction; Human rights; Doctrine","score_opus":0.030955360206700148,"score_gpt":0.30748826681018404,"score_spread":0.2765329066034839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124905978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.102324195,0.024962924,0.008126449,0.26324248,0.0011566051,0.000051895564,0.00017166897,0.00008157188,0.5998821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93060833,0.003026924,0.0012797925,0.03810494,0.00055711705,0.00004297722,0.00004274521,0.000036452384,0.02630063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914608,0.0021000304,0.0001906161,0.0008544451,0.0025352794,0.0028587212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99613756,0.002123702,0.00027697755,0.00037162015,0.00069333694,0.00039686367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062937685,0.00020992552,0.0006113814,0.0013698315,0.014796845,0.012787527,0.0021026644,0.006197326,0.0037502632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013011547,0.00032664562,0.00042773582,0.0014434796,0.031064795,0.0068503763,0.0036631327,0.009282083,0.00042797523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066693387,0.0000048472234,0.0003264187,0.0000070074807,0.0000023018788,0.000038775474,0.0019631472,0.00003687536,0.00005203484,0.98937374,0.0048301015,0.0033580717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049438153,0.00003337744,0.0054094153,0.00031820207,0.000021525899,0.00014172653,0.010271915,0.0005880455,0.00045684772,0.71624684,0.2664044,0.00005820585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46664956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6179893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46664956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027069317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028843857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9278667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124914215","doi":"10.21991/c9zd49","title":"The Manual of Official Procedure of the Government of Canada: An Exposé","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Political science; Politics; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Constitutional interpretation; Work (physics); Isolation (microbiology); Constitutional law; Engineering; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023274348880416247,"score_gpt":0.24181212346937886,"score_spread":0.21853777458896262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124914215","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013019934,0.01852051,0.045888387,0.077788316,0.003847142,0.00044490388,0.0021656523,0.0011300781,0.8371952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46339992,0.02053687,0.08055398,0.02801301,0.0013540165,0.00070888747,0.0020562734,0.0013220239,0.40205508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97648925,0.003128816,0.0008669251,0.0013734786,0.014917638,0.0032239142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99114066,0.0018616143,0.00031487568,0.00082262873,0.0053905803,0.00046967636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008903188,0.000627977,0.00060853135,0.0041660783,0.01714732,0.011886029,0.0029773982,0.0036860628,0.006034406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012857809,0.0007309978,0.00051711075,0.005652134,0.019761216,0.0030248626,0.00255666,0.006985712,0.0009436678],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005120876,0.0000070177343,0.00029125996,0.000049004324,0.000002860689,0.00004754148,0.0042761597,0.00018409942,0.00016796608,0.92646533,0.049177583,0.019326076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049513555,0.0000057687544,0.0020041903,0.00019887101,0.0000064264827,0.000053347398,0.0017992965,0.0003372216,0.0003176892,0.022825504,0.97240037,0.000046302943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9804534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9840565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87400484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12599516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29929927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9141631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125035025","doi":"10.21991/c93x1k","title":"Purposive Interpretation, Quebec, and the Supreme Court Act","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Supreme court; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Point (geometry); Sociology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.012454290916723192,"score_gpt":0.25396228198520937,"score_spread":0.24150799106848617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125035025","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045530442,0.008346933,0.008433043,0.06425864,0.0008675386,0.000112164504,0.0006898782,0.00006461412,0.87169665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9206921,0.0024769763,0.0031954558,0.014015111,0.00027143295,0.00015342765,0.0002113676,0.000055318877,0.058928777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935627,0.0029173756,0.00015165629,0.00054648286,0.001796774,0.001025061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99094945,0.004639674,0.00050625164,0.0006394252,0.002815127,0.00044999612],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065065254,0.00039990616,0.0004575409,0.0022068657,0.014148935,0.007236802,0.0019763478,0.0028992044,0.00817576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013186811,0.00027293625,0.00032580586,0.0031544024,0.015264174,0.0024328204,0.0021147744,0.0058520352,0.00040205094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007709405,0.000007241321,0.0007996717,0.000024342227,0.0000044127223,0.00010086061,0.0032159318,0.000106177176,0.000033859324,0.98005784,0.011406438,0.0042356336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062579005,0.000022376822,0.020841787,0.00084647327,0.00006371628,0.00016017356,0.013181091,0.002605519,0.0005242863,0.5072359,0.45434672,0.00010935832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9315193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96703655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06848067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048177414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04222473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34955323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125088037","doi":"","title":"The Conventions of Constitutional Amendment in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Constitution; Law; Democratic legitimacy; Convention; Political science; Democracy; Constitutional amendment; Legitimacy; Politics; Supreme court; Sociology","score_opus":0.02346169341973896,"score_gpt":0.2687058494116898,"score_spread":0.24524415599195082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125088037","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024842333,0.009055976,0.008562199,0.057477262,0.0011143376,0.00030573033,0.00092385354,0.000315941,0.8974024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81542945,0.005318223,0.014512734,0.014698011,0.0003943777,0.0003469402,0.00059757306,0.00019110095,0.14851162],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9740097,0.005143332,0.0014897443,0.002792401,0.01108424,0.005480656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851076,0.0041575516,0.0008945155,0.0018713728,0.0066603343,0.0013086016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012904409,0.00046901786,0.0007657405,0.0029909343,0.023610448,0.01522333,0.0025956167,0.0051241326,0.006012452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029199356,0.00070713134,0.0005894734,0.004875237,0.02306831,0.0027489641,0.0049460633,0.008408865,0.00057176617],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005909313,0.000005471693,0.00033551172,0.000021317566,0.0000050847493,0.0000421628,0.0020270539,0.00045310374,0.00009191294,0.9768933,0.0142208375,0.0058983597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046532874,0.000020417909,0.0060337414,0.00030777362,0.00003409568,0.000069620415,0.0024776114,0.0017390678,0.0005234525,0.1701893,0.8183905,0.00016787987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9813704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9813368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17869519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17869519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2729188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95259714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125166712","doi":"10.1017/s0021223716000029","title":"Juxtaposing Constitution-Making and Constitutional-Infringement Mechanisms in Israel and Canada: On the Interplay between Common Law Override and Sunset Override","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Legislature; Common law; Political science; Constitutional law; Delegation; Judicial review; Separation of powers; Parliamentary sovereignty; Politics; Parliament","score_opus":0.02927075477351136,"score_gpt":0.3191953073681385,"score_spread":0.2899245525946271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125166712","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45961106,0.0033864293,0.006069617,0.016493168,0.00007101307,0.00017268893,0.00019458111,0.00007801276,0.5139235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856193,0.00056441576,0.00083115476,0.0007884426,0.000008994698,0.00001305852,0.000028777788,0.000015898668,0.012129886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909691,0.0010364888,0.00015677096,0.000499747,0.0031862713,0.0041515636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99398154,0.0025240763,0.0004932804,0.00033031567,0.0018614513,0.00080926064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043788864,0.00031704418,0.0004887161,0.003445981,0.0144241825,0.011091574,0.0020544308,0.0029558265,0.0060697156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0106779495,0.0004425164,0.00049849786,0.0036493228,0.01618227,0.002767996,0.0039731152,0.003510686,0.00016197954],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044379958,0.00003061077,0.008712051,0.00004645935,0.00003341042,0.000551905,0.011025276,0.0016062584,0.00044411607,0.9600098,0.0024617238,0.01503398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000213334,0.00011164792,0.12189759,0.0007237736,0.0004635372,0.00072075665,0.0970788,0.018944515,0.005507476,0.34008572,0.41352472,0.0007281658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9851833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.991903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15049432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15049432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13278805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9853062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125174861","doi":"","title":"Avoiding the Common Wisdom Fallacy: The Role of Social Sciences in Constitutional Adjudication","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Margin of appreciation; Fallacy; Argument (complex analysis); Legislator; Political science; Supreme court; Empirical evidence; Law; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Common law; Constitutional review; Order (exchange); Sociology; Politics; Economics; Legislation; Epistemology; Fundamental rights; Human rights","score_opus":0.07628490587999803,"score_gpt":0.36142211691821013,"score_spread":0.2851372110382121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125174861","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05050255,0.020845272,0.1338932,0.6241779,0.0035431262,0.00021436652,0.00010848802,0.00010886206,0.16660626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91872483,0.0047833067,0.027192216,0.04074826,0.004627628,0.00036399215,0.000042089123,0.00011352127,0.0034041852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.82480353,0.13539109,0.004668215,0.009625233,0.021485731,0.0040262123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.64497507,0.31898773,0.009704934,0.013842529,0.009576244,0.0029134494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17744124,0.0010556399,0.0033088715,0.009174047,0.018752154,0.02105477,0.004720481,0.02079069,0.0038928918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24971788,0.0012428032,0.0017943522,0.0065064025,0.12743549,0.03912839,0.01529096,0.026705602,0.00068739866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023207476,0.000012361266,0.0004429284,0.00006485048,0.000030631272,0.00007157786,0.0023528317,0.0003207683,0.00003087705,0.98842865,0.002105333,0.006115963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024620122,0.000007940098,0.0001699098,0.00010961249,0.000009854254,0.000017711609,0.00045755642,0.00057103374,0.000055069337,0.9949846,0.003581172,0.000010824226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010949084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012686427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17744124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014425138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018012894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93841016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125195555","doi":"","title":"General Legitimacy of Judicial Review and the Fundamental Basis of Constitutional Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Legitimacy; Constitutional interpretation; Normative; Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional theory; Judicial review; Legislation; Constitutional review; Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.012671599790233093,"score_gpt":0.2045186402159796,"score_spread":0.19184704042574652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125195555","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07080024,0.0117261885,0.047956154,0.16245429,0.0009474979,0.00013589319,0.00026607153,0.00022937258,0.7054843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97757804,0.00309966,0.0057448125,0.0035465627,0.0017293957,0.00015112168,0.000077567354,0.00006204306,0.00801082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9654177,0.016469028,0.0014924819,0.0040968233,0.010470267,0.0020537523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9048741,0.07236631,0.0054178517,0.009418807,0.0066859503,0.0012369864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035634708,0.0004561739,0.0016103113,0.005359332,0.0052877404,0.01375971,0.0026564142,0.009285399,0.007438326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07742319,0.00071980356,0.0008200235,0.003646593,0.08592581,0.015191225,0.0052425107,0.0069080046,0.0009077537],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025403563,0.0000035789797,0.00011234278,0.000014101566,0.0000021649348,0.000010162617,0.00020000065,0.000088613924,0.000016882132,0.99839264,0.00040969843,0.0007473333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012700876,0.0000041212325,0.00022833068,0.000050372924,0.0000033743218,0.000025909838,0.00010792626,0.00035435325,0.000053402262,0.9940445,0.005109494,0.000005555125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049837264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052345716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035634708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009972718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00938748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1884566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125326458","doi":"","title":"Bills of Rights in Functioning Parliamentary Democracies: Kantian, Consequentialist and Institutionalist Scepticisms","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Constitution; Parliamentary sovereignty; Law; Bill of rights; Political science; Statute; Law and economics; Politics; Constitutional law; Sociology; Parliament","score_opus":0.011610530064060478,"score_gpt":0.26943553986065566,"score_spread":0.2578250097965952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125326458","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11795261,0.0069165747,0.06457252,0.1338157,0.00075611356,0.00012198272,0.00023571563,0.00014063121,0.6754881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9757464,0.0012271563,0.008477426,0.0035295673,0.00045903,0.00014320275,0.000060768838,0.000048589853,0.010307821],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9826978,0.00974195,0.0008785467,0.0015743808,0.0034307383,0.0016765015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9805973,0.012040152,0.0018892377,0.0033654885,0.0015381821,0.0005694716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020705778,0.00034815673,0.0006702537,0.0026479065,0.0056197755,0.014574544,0.001806142,0.00623788,0.0037442609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026832936,0.0005888478,0.0010185834,0.0019804442,0.06694529,0.011432353,0.0042919884,0.009515751,0.00076707086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017659708,0.0000018620004,0.000027731916,0.0000034456966,0.0000012152107,0.00000398613,0.00022639583,0.00008298604,0.0000087487915,0.99884677,0.00025026296,0.00054472196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010830128,0.0000049854493,0.00022846699,0.000034357407,0.0000038041442,0.000014430623,0.00022462076,0.00033582377,0.00007123074,0.99065346,0.008412345,0.000005737057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026593124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022443037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020705778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007812576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004560006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.109503925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125327145","doi":"10.32920/22341316.v1","title":"Experimenting with Credibility in Refugee Adjudication: Gaydar","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; York University","keywords":"Refugee; Credibility; Persecution; Adjudication; Plaintiff; Immigration; Refugee law; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.10417704146878773,"score_gpt":0.37531683090532303,"score_spread":0.2711397894365353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125327145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9706946,0.00007376742,0.0037001083,0.002396326,0.00010218811,0.00037911694,0.00005751097,0.00002936541,0.022567062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925678,0.0000460687,0.0044440906,0.00060341455,0.000040238974,0.0002795926,0.00002820628,0.000017199913,0.0019735047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96876466,0.024448032,0.0008998805,0.002083612,0.0030481725,0.0007557135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.65704054,0.30538818,0.014167612,0.015146449,0.0055581145,0.002699059],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041319165,0.00040281782,0.00067891966,0.00045513274,0.0046437676,0.0057582916,0.0018879708,0.0035640413,0.0098628625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2132293,0.0006496889,0.0004742802,0.0005868096,0.009393526,0.0055602137,0.003261609,0.0057033,0.00094848266],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.028064001,0.03292255,0.09489848,0.0016808877,0.00049146445,0.002838927,0.23341878,0.016569942,0.059098173,0.36991087,0.012088595,0.14801732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.024266709,0.043529972,0.08977329,0.0016600713,0.0010163375,0.0015097711,0.10811894,0.15118402,0.07725159,0.39986804,0.10060213,0.0012190866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006273935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009082367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041319165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032199488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038791571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21851921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125335885","doi":"","title":"How Harper Will Reshape Canada's Courts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Charter; Political science; Bill of rights; Constitution; Separation of powers; Legislature; Judicial review; Judicial activism; Judicial independence; Government (linguistics); State (computer science)","score_opus":0.04375840710499277,"score_gpt":0.2600118247841899,"score_spread":0.21625341767919712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125335885","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027740913,0.010797151,0.0030802398,0.5921898,0.0067468556,0.00012455392,0.00042572664,0.00047105245,0.35842374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40070012,0.0074371328,0.00480766,0.22378437,0.0014211586,0.00008911131,0.0002729327,0.00030905157,0.36117846],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9848162,0.0014196594,0.00018434106,0.0015246694,0.0051665865,0.0068885586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98609424,0.0012601437,0.00028316604,0.0006967708,0.007073597,0.004592133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007937983,0.00071189797,0.00050308206,0.0018579907,0.03977045,0.020838,0.0041021397,0.009500353,0.016516943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020113258,0.00077160564,0.0007119827,0.0019239775,0.015998784,0.00666805,0.0046446514,0.01164925,0.0030360117],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004405563,0.000040347524,0.0034163385,0.000052804575,0.000030857584,0.0005315418,0.00489136,0.00060764246,0.00036310765,0.4403161,0.50919497,0.040510796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003349385,0.000022270346,0.002581375,0.00017832399,0.000024811121,0.00008738456,0.004358574,0.0004999165,0.0002922017,0.021739129,0.9700739,0.00010872529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9899888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9954497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82358515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17641488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29013452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.955242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125402060","doi":"10.32920/22227784.v1","title":"Shouldn’t the bench be a mirror? The diversity of the Canadian judiciary","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Meritocracy; Compromise; Objectivity (philosophy); Diversity (politics); Political science; Population; Economic Justice; Composition (language); Public administration; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08403152688698305,"score_gpt":0.3017344156809138,"score_spread":0.21770288879393074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125402060","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78947353,0.0045527993,0.0016839039,0.09379396,0.00018453851,0.00004587214,0.00095968234,0.00003656772,0.109269105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995259,0.0004615268,0.00027158196,0.0012453003,0.000027445809,0.000004642704,0.00008242539,0.000007928476,0.0026402385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.994905,0.00067845674,0.00008726179,0.0004961022,0.002269192,0.0015639516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955741,0.00064864615,0.0004915065,0.00018075165,0.0017156765,0.0013893673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030384692,0.00019364363,0.00037115466,0.0028182983,0.020874692,0.008138123,0.0013335275,0.00086112093,0.004162944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009433839,0.00023173413,0.00020582482,0.0044237804,0.013407929,0.002376519,0.0025221452,0.0016872534,0.00025691555],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021968735,0.000068108064,0.20814419,0.00023937087,0.00016662212,0.00050810166,0.12213334,0.0011879215,0.002419771,0.4452033,0.04887904,0.1708306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035435205,0.00009227553,0.6336281,0.00040764362,0.000083233084,0.00020891076,0.1632703,0.0010473019,0.0010138492,0.02689411,0.17315713,0.00016182431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9845722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99251044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.073884115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.073884115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06798088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5360693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125451397","doi":"","title":"Does Canada Need a Political Questions Doctrine","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Politics; Doctrine; Political question; Constitution; Political science; Jurisdiction; Law; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04879384909013636,"score_gpt":0.30121665232459816,"score_spread":0.2524228032344618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125451397","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023313219,0.003216375,0.0029897967,0.3856679,0.0009532544,0.00005879059,0.00035496638,0.000067982095,0.5833776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7797576,0.0033004729,0.0024991592,0.0828488,0.0005117543,0.000063725085,0.0001679554,0.00012164055,0.130729],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99125457,0.0010816267,0.00018024017,0.0010486597,0.0033872167,0.0030477133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893512,0.003551783,0.00048999506,0.0006705638,0.0041082595,0.0018280728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060291286,0.00032946633,0.0006768439,0.001186289,0.023187991,0.01660454,0.0019542677,0.008991673,0.015758809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017635439,0.00039130845,0.00064179127,0.0019379118,0.0313378,0.008224285,0.0035641512,0.009779881,0.0014793919],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067125347,0.0000053140543,0.0003874753,0.000016593573,0.0000031897325,0.00006964808,0.0022060073,0.00006148408,0.00006102325,0.97951746,0.013920952,0.0037442264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039136674,0.000015860342,0.0028789695,0.00023466692,0.000030192074,0.00011707186,0.010348073,0.00037044886,0.00039878197,0.2538058,0.7316801,0.000080926664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9655656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9758933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.091988124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.091988124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18648502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66742367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125595189","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3292","title":"Administrative Constitutionalism and the Unity of Public Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Administrative law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Constitutionalism; Public law; Judicial review; Supreme court; Constitutional law; Human rights; Common law; Tribunal; Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.09471585267997136,"score_gpt":0.34251426663522305,"score_spread":0.2477984139552517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125595189","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.074759364,0.004401641,0.024526116,0.08385345,0.0005248309,0.000100306155,0.00013880836,0.00020887882,0.81148654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98511165,0.0004935818,0.0017988887,0.001594332,0.00017638903,0.000040299514,0.0000319542,0.000035408757,0.010717583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98055685,0.0061287573,0.00057845644,0.002288107,0.005647823,0.0047999076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98181367,0.0072619882,0.0012514374,0.0026629614,0.004677063,0.0023328634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013361879,0.0003005539,0.0005954164,0.0031436742,0.01939794,0.023006516,0.0025685288,0.004360237,0.0037219967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027090529,0.0005005837,0.00060641026,0.002793557,0.09105447,0.007314284,0.007565632,0.007502713,0.00035994675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015653441,0.0000032645114,0.000091833965,0.0000044316257,0.0000011456563,0.000008200628,0.0010856848,0.00007190588,0.0000209276,0.9969055,0.0004948693,0.0013108067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027281103,0.000012329014,0.0019331386,0.000072681374,0.000021298642,0.000036318914,0.0032384866,0.0005586336,0.00021528639,0.904224,0.089637995,0.000022552173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34533417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31738245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34533417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051849183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0922697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68664825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125616118","doi":"","title":"ACCESS TO JUSTICE LOOKING FOR A CONSTITUTIONAL HOME: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE LEGAL SYSTEM","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Constitution; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.14398722032429034,"score_gpt":0.4063718441865333,"score_spread":0.262384623862243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125616118","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045817286,0.010937149,0.0069745705,0.5697071,0.0008189994,0.00008408185,0.00023850774,0.00008560376,0.3653368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8907815,0.005047462,0.0042681606,0.063945495,0.0011128307,0.00008722152,0.000075260235,0.000087721695,0.03459429],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865714,0.002748591,0.00030834365,0.0015508257,0.0032777358,0.0055430788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9787275,0.011214885,0.0008430417,0.00081823237,0.0041901246,0.0042061755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010271423,0.00043304634,0.0011552068,0.0023482107,0.03887106,0.03150517,0.0054527544,0.017810669,0.010672842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019986367,0.0005622212,0.0011530047,0.0032008155,0.07693644,0.014252801,0.008094006,0.017008575,0.00070199574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004515364,0.0000122441015,0.0003968756,0.000015050279,0.0000029230914,0.00016245438,0.0037644152,0.00012067773,0.00004622899,0.9876587,0.0057319324,0.002084028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041391515,0.000016529286,0.0049111727,0.000396552,0.00003957365,0.00019612689,0.022257593,0.0012180316,0.00021810226,0.8158846,0.15468639,0.0001339085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8977099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9244717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8766158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12338418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14536767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8952191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125655638","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1150","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada, Charter Dialogue, and Deference","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Legitimacy; Charter; Deference; Legislature; Political science; Judicial review; Law; Compromise; Law and economics; Democracy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.02033790141869781,"score_gpt":0.2464905909848397,"score_spread":0.22615268956614187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125655638","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.090604335,0.015611087,0.00566592,0.1751478,0.000748479,0.00006957645,0.00018169629,0.00007222838,0.71189886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96515113,0.0015933795,0.00087801676,0.011639928,0.00015016047,0.000031654272,0.00003027841,0.00001681675,0.020508666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98739314,0.0032516466,0.00017692221,0.00091592397,0.0044408324,0.0038215087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893862,0.004552875,0.0008341543,0.00035167934,0.0029516309,0.0019234875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007795611,0.000344131,0.00042430256,0.0022325432,0.027178384,0.011647992,0.0017746675,0.0071979472,0.0035194827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020896424,0.0002654451,0.000306765,0.0028743998,0.031559996,0.004341005,0.0055141854,0.00712886,0.00019242647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008335836,0.0000052317528,0.00052240177,0.000017065555,0.0000029004013,0.00008161905,0.008927359,0.00015580218,0.000040590363,0.9774245,0.0078034154,0.0050107567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000396304,0.000032627442,0.009049959,0.00048379283,0.000043996897,0.00021054962,0.023159789,0.001123729,0.00039394866,0.54405457,0.4212697,0.00013771084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92828315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95358837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.089716844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.089716844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14057729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65094435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125688624","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200001140","title":"Law's Knowledge and Law's Effectiveness: Reflections from Legal Sociology and Legal Theory","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Curiosity; Nagging; Institutionalisation; Bureaucracy; Rationalization (economics); Law; Sociology; Parallels; Political science; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025207395803524567,"score_gpt":0.35074309936203935,"score_spread":0.3255357035585148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125688624","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051264327,0.023076488,0.004143797,0.4475282,0.0006464879,0.000044022257,0.00003851429,0.000034378536,0.47322372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9694801,0.006713592,0.0006386055,0.01133718,0.000668264,0.000048522717,0.000014311862,0.000056118344,0.011043368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9678752,0.02365619,0.000525575,0.001307434,0.0035469043,0.003088774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8952317,0.095777,0.0020592094,0.0015116235,0.003220552,0.002199891],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039783247,0.0005674717,0.0010731719,0.006495195,0.014054586,0.028612828,0.0034503527,0.010326154,0.0058478094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051197074,0.0005222333,0.0006487599,0.0040949928,0.16139299,0.02605569,0.010341413,0.010408294,0.0006563779],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009146416,0.000036296005,0.00020062317,0.000061250415,0.000005189214,0.00009088235,0.05382106,0.00013137465,0.000023879147,0.93926775,0.003069401,0.0032831107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048325208,0.00004322435,0.0012500494,0.00065072917,0.000017083526,0.00012107457,0.1371175,0.00055072433,0.00026467978,0.718103,0.14180495,0.000028591849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023776315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021581758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039783247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030631693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015090108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22224951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125719470","doi":"","title":"A Theory of Quasi-Constitutional Legislation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Legislation; Constitution; Political science; Law; Constitutional law; Constitutional economics; Lawmaking; Constitutional review; Constitutional theory; Supreme court; Legislature","score_opus":0.01701624254465074,"score_gpt":0.2729659923426385,"score_spread":0.2559497497979878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125719470","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015381717,0.0032014176,0.1638172,0.020845186,0.00038621313,0.00016515964,0.00031146922,0.00015938708,0.79573226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87340856,0.003256387,0.0486352,0.006953167,0.0007881822,0.0004865547,0.00030093774,0.00012854283,0.066042386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99523664,0.0016135706,0.00014276349,0.0007823633,0.0014156748,0.00080898765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963271,0.001855289,0.00034027567,0.00058567437,0.00071620767,0.00017549531],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005945117,0.00049477204,0.0005010159,0.002330027,0.005693579,0.0054151965,0.0020881728,0.0033527252,0.008143822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051592807,0.0004090639,0.0010644798,0.002207084,0.040827356,0.006707659,0.002251289,0.004658784,0.001129507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.8946099e-7,6.523455e-7,0.000012907902,0.0000020215743,3.4667784e-7,0.0000042900897,0.00009710756,0.00003892945,0.000004652112,0.99951136,0.00012603041,0.00020150379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007599023,0.0000053812214,0.00019863354,0.00004091716,0.0000043128334,0.000028328272,0.00013863352,0.0005670106,0.00005669749,0.9539537,0.044993483,0.0000053243743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.068616904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04610234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.068616904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013557187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013498523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13643503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125774979","doi":"","title":"Exchanging Constitutions: Constitutional Bricolage in Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Law and economics; Charter; Bricolage; Constitutional law; Globalization; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.04739537618638404,"score_gpt":0.3031354908338467,"score_spread":0.25574011464746266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125774979","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2023973,0.003293344,0.0014376849,0.045728974,0.0003187293,0.00012170258,0.00055906305,0.00008058923,0.7460626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91891634,0.0013136525,0.0005878066,0.0038346916,0.00005091403,0.000027868007,0.00010537837,0.000043981057,0.07511941],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901924,0.001093182,0.00020648167,0.00082356035,0.0032541163,0.004430217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934349,0.0024072495,0.00031619167,0.0005458347,0.0020734244,0.0012223716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004426871,0.00024144955,0.00050802185,0.0018297064,0.032769352,0.012794211,0.0022392748,0.0044361926,0.018865785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02079075,0.00044683492,0.00031048025,0.0056281514,0.0137008205,0.0035510915,0.0053474414,0.005403611,0.0005669314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040295097,0.000021686927,0.002793571,0.000038870745,0.000011987845,0.00029294414,0.016182374,0.00054617325,0.00017112705,0.932436,0.027028313,0.02043676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009957749,0.000042020292,0.023902975,0.00025045912,0.00008161002,0.00017555825,0.039565623,0.0024273486,0.0009771675,0.112893544,0.8194148,0.00016941449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99081564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13301694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13301694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22438765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125784337","doi":"","title":"Judicial Activism in the House of Lords: A Composite Constitutionalist Approach","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Jurisprudence; Law; Judicial activism; Judicial review; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Constitutional law; Political science; Law and economics; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.01474734586211135,"score_gpt":0.2647009438853208,"score_spread":0.24995359802320943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125784337","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046282716,0.0030036021,0.056175664,0.011928821,0.0004129309,0.00018431696,0.000051043313,0.000044967277,0.8819159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9554146,0.00076285144,0.011663237,0.0012845115,0.00057467236,0.00023892228,0.00003356274,0.000059777132,0.0299678],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9838706,0.008211346,0.0005311639,0.0017444062,0.0036691243,0.0019733598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99492174,0.0032000453,0.00034677162,0.00056272047,0.00053715846,0.00043155355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009427148,0.00035566842,0.0008018998,0.003988251,0.007650163,0.016467664,0.0026727824,0.0052211834,0.006155701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009248423,0.0005595589,0.00092641043,0.0021633706,0.025566569,0.007803644,0.006779486,0.006843502,0.0005372792],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004219182,0.000007943413,0.00007422567,0.000010974514,0.0000020583386,0.000039082,0.0014105116,0.00021499324,0.000041616422,0.996136,0.00030179598,0.0017565823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002192567,0.000038434755,0.0008996471,0.00014023243,0.000019306239,0.00009080192,0.0027027081,0.0026128083,0.000345896,0.9203417,0.07276091,0.000025634925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058188285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010717357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016467664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0090277335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056668813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065501094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125838466","doi":"","title":"The Responsibility of Judges in Interpreting Tax Legislation: Japan’s Experience","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Statutory interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Statutory law; Jurisprudence; Law; Normative; Political science; Supreme court; Meaning (existential); Law and economics; Economics; Linguistics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.054345914101540445,"score_gpt":0.3392434112677006,"score_spread":0.28489749716616014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125838466","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7869145,0.012353012,0.0036259857,0.07700061,0.0016728551,0.000064186155,0.000047911326,0.00007640817,0.118244514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982945,0.0027890953,0.0006548421,0.0068522617,0.00033653135,0.00002142963,0.000022507287,0.000053436994,0.006324835],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98715115,0.007000139,0.00078019017,0.0010430465,0.0016996224,0.0023259101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896299,0.0039946353,0.00095005677,0.00070963876,0.0025090603,0.0022067383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017979667,0.00044223448,0.00082974177,0.0010538057,0.024300685,0.009095561,0.0015760792,0.0053591463,0.0026775226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019985797,0.0009655309,0.00057999825,0.0018710741,0.01923312,0.007107945,0.0096147945,0.008021276,0.00043644317],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008961779,0.000095172094,0.008749389,0.00019287659,0.000030533745,0.0040939897,0.9184651,0.00016494053,0.0014817286,0.034043156,0.016120315,0.016473254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011076212,0.00019206745,0.02013385,0.0005852212,0.000104256585,0.0018704697,0.6279458,0.0010312991,0.0010853856,0.01663508,0.33000118,0.00030466978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054222014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.102449514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054222014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007947086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009115915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10781282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125840202","doi":"10.1163/2211906x-00201001","title":"Mapping Judicial Independence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Sine qua non; Judicial independence; Taxonomy (biology); Constitutionalism; Judicial opinion; Law; Political science; Judicial discretion; Democracy; Epistemology; Law and economics; Judicial review; Sociology; Mathematics; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.05183660684527865,"score_gpt":0.34140819154974467,"score_spread":0.28957158470446603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125840202","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25985247,0.0012313735,0.11663437,0.0021354896,0.0001727143,0.00040962666,0.0041344776,0.00037695424,0.61505246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9495007,0.0008610811,0.032204058,0.00015209484,0.000031206804,0.00021656672,0.0024019317,0.00009283061,0.014539464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99440455,0.001756288,0.00038380027,0.00095204567,0.0018712105,0.00063201407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986516,0.0066577247,0.0014371842,0.0021886155,0.0027705515,0.00042986588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003668779,0.00037397616,0.0005498388,0.0113751395,0.0033818637,0.006122979,0.0011717543,0.0010532658,0.018778684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02527101,0.00045594177,0.0005420687,0.013207419,0.0031392255,0.008657952,0.004497703,0.0015089974,0.0023304916],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052036663,0.000054985678,0.03023776,0.0003366679,0.000033904107,0.00037164657,0.018730512,0.0028400274,0.0011393764,0.78491473,0.00692878,0.15435955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023501903,0.00006455868,0.06370593,0.00066211564,0.000054376877,0.0006313296,0.053042125,0.010371787,0.0026161296,0.65221906,0.21654116,0.00006791194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008311431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075729284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018778684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036202178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035471185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06282097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125871169","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3040","title":"From Principles to Rules: The Case for Statutory Rules Governing Aspects of Judicial Disqualification","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Law; Proposition; Context (archaeology); Judicial review; CLARITY; Judicial discretion; Apprehension; Judicial opinion; Statutory interpretation; Political science; Common law; Sociology; Psychology; History; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0569221846130246,"score_gpt":0.3164076756664126,"score_spread":0.259485491053388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125871169","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09521149,0.007276549,0.20271215,0.3366761,0.0023545357,0.00047659304,0.00022721777,0.0003006867,0.35476467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92502433,0.0011224481,0.029981054,0.034748726,0.0009998959,0.00040520795,0.000075683536,0.00016316073,0.007479482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.88165504,0.05433208,0.008450957,0.012892158,0.029585285,0.013084413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8325463,0.116792455,0.009036134,0.022764215,0.015204581,0.0036562874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11880061,0.00053871144,0.0017421286,0.0025509403,0.012308372,0.020620836,0.0058793128,0.021632846,0.003033676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17383727,0.0013784282,0.0022612163,0.0021416843,0.09026523,0.018634232,0.008702824,0.0311857,0.0007832428],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011858233,0.000012471939,0.00040964724,0.000019151901,0.0000088281795,0.00006679114,0.0017101286,0.00027225653,0.000060799008,0.9920582,0.0017772089,0.003592722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056005443,0.000026885265,0.00069042866,0.00032067488,0.000022948143,0.000111317684,0.0014944089,0.0010426723,0.00031759066,0.96457237,0.03128959,0.00005506748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044347443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041129347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11880061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014537622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03738675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62828517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125892871","doi":"","title":"Thinking in Three Dimensions: Theorizing Rights as a Normative Concept","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Value pluralism; Variety (cybernetics); Pluralism (philosophy); Value (mathematics); Fundamental rights; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Human rights; Constraint (computer-aided design); Moral rights; Political science; Sociology; Law; Politics; Mathematics; Philosophy; Intellectual property","score_opus":0.016437603626950632,"score_gpt":0.27659309654648423,"score_spread":0.2601554929195336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125892871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03720409,0.0049009575,0.18964987,0.09183513,0.0006237583,0.00011631288,0.00011444259,0.00011786029,0.6754375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9455255,0.0023027137,0.033390794,0.0053617465,0.00058252655,0.00029344592,0.000096816846,0.00012313301,0.012323276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.987713,0.0077351728,0.00037125679,0.0010366804,0.0022499629,0.0008939336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907081,0.00579175,0.00078673265,0.001135111,0.0008057698,0.00077251426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012807334,0.00086690113,0.0006978346,0.0033183154,0.00578723,0.01656648,0.0026344766,0.0065599442,0.005294921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012079438,0.0004725129,0.00088569603,0.0030747326,0.08770317,0.03598941,0.0075519425,0.01044115,0.0006587276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014025702,0.0000032287478,0.00004874857,0.0000064402784,0.0000010705826,0.000011338917,0.00116054,0.00009403086,0.000016731165,0.9977836,0.00022575186,0.0006471651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003432512,0.0000021488881,0.00005108649,0.000029980174,0.0000014160206,0.000013919199,0.0010017318,0.00023150993,0.00002488864,0.9926893,0.005946727,0.0000037952725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043373997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030323942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01656648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008129794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060623926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06773251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125919187","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1284","title":"Deliberate Disregard: Judicial Appointments under the Harper Government","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Racialization; Government (linguistics); Principal (computer security); Identity (music); Political science; Law; Constitutional law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03106755276336939,"score_gpt":0.297525379356055,"score_spread":0.26645782659268563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125919187","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75257194,0.004181577,0.0064482153,0.08118884,0.0004903474,0.00011360125,0.000075545744,0.000066569395,0.15486328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992547,0.00025674555,0.0002569322,0.0041438253,0.000110410256,0.000011261362,0.000006027054,0.000008795896,0.0026591825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9568583,0.013482595,0.0011338025,0.0033614228,0.013470449,0.011693405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9672046,0.019391762,0.0042743017,0.0017567129,0.0041907676,0.0031818426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025792208,0.00014234049,0.000653086,0.0020298238,0.0282686,0.010159127,0.0023562473,0.0051139933,0.0019894417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06138344,0.0004769187,0.00043189633,0.002580471,0.021697672,0.0029182702,0.005897749,0.008915537,0.0001973543],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000104963154,0.00007090643,0.014894418,0.00008658481,0.00006300327,0.0012271242,0.118161455,0.0006346775,0.0009488552,0.8179094,0.01296608,0.032932587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019165248,0.00024535693,0.14122821,0.0007914921,0.0002519104,0.0010608146,0.19409634,0.0026108494,0.0033438208,0.27473977,0.3810157,0.00042411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3750124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5121905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6249876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026822282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039871674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7456592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126007625","doi":"","title":"Judging in Secular Times: Max Weber and the Rise of Proportionality","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Jurisprudence; Churning; Bureaucracy; Law; Sociology; Metaphysics; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03660460054409996,"score_gpt":0.3008139629620157,"score_spread":0.2642093624179157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126007625","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035940584,0.029888224,0.011372974,0.15757947,0.0018224068,0.00003364545,0.00004678234,0.000053710803,0.7632623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94876206,0.0054316414,0.003572963,0.00731374,0.0014520903,0.000035725247,0.000015949596,0.000052904034,0.033362832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99579775,0.0023266103,0.00012560851,0.00050044205,0.00088656764,0.00036315157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99418986,0.0042744684,0.00028740382,0.0003676196,0.0005404158,0.00034021348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00806312,0.00035185248,0.00036170622,0.0023012112,0.007457911,0.008226526,0.0007178105,0.0028219728,0.0030669721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013189192,0.0003242967,0.00022304006,0.0017302987,0.044895217,0.011524032,0.0026072108,0.0042287433,0.0003524734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019792296,0.0000017259722,0.000041006817,0.0000036933595,4.785663e-7,0.000013980196,0.0012633981,0.000033335506,0.000008464986,0.9944594,0.0021970833,0.001975476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000483128,0.0000033389904,0.00013514099,0.00004141157,0.000001155315,0.000018673847,0.0008923816,0.00014732,0.000048007943,0.9411395,0.05756091,0.0000073941037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018383443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02010396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018383443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008357486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034317202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06063807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126129298","doi":"","title":"The Attorney General’s Forgotten Role as Legal Advisor to the Legislature: A Comment on Schmidt v Canada (Attorney General)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Appeal; Political science; Parliament; House of Commons; Charter; Argument (complex analysis); Politics","score_opus":0.010139591605986239,"score_gpt":0.24930359281856615,"score_spread":0.2391640012125799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126129298","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012863159,0.0039103082,0.00081404106,0.9383771,0.0040076473,0.00007720512,0.00032212012,0.00010492879,0.039523557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07061215,0.0012953436,0.0006990287,0.9032671,0.001640041,0.00006090363,0.000061260485,0.00009235063,0.022271855],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97821665,0.0030502432,0.0010762563,0.0029572798,0.007921098,0.006778425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9814455,0.010913312,0.00056788785,0.00036226847,0.00453062,0.0021803628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013485849,0.0010084818,0.0014469968,0.0016779142,0.041173384,0.013810794,0.008791238,0.06918708,0.004259547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031632204,0.0021107914,0.002309271,0.0028523877,0.028334966,0.005316904,0.0039353548,0.06578771,0.0011169257],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009725841,0.000036422927,0.001969158,0.00016210391,0.00005366726,0.0014130423,0.019413913,0.00037293663,0.0007680171,0.32241875,0.64697134,0.0063233445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022467446,0.00007204761,0.009645576,0.0011035318,0.00024750087,0.00057520444,0.02230699,0.0016071167,0.0020777057,0.031080924,0.93048245,0.00057626603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96599734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97812665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90766335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.092336655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13552284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66995245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126134713","doi":"","title":"Independent or Dependent? Constitutional Courts in Divided Societies","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnic group; Independence (probability theory); Judicial independence; Politics; Political science; Law; Constitutional court; Constitutional law; Minority rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Constitution","score_opus":0.026380457616388502,"score_gpt":0.3015190333346295,"score_spread":0.27513857571824096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126134713","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3844702,0.0033022352,0.022296038,0.040413406,0.00028471203,0.00011788892,0.00017137663,0.000054657325,0.5488895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884349,0.00033946693,0.0012365979,0.0018731266,0.00014583927,0.00006077177,0.000033204797,0.00001580526,0.007860096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872032,0.005686476,0.00059616665,0.0024828815,0.0019745748,0.002056709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98130393,0.009062685,0.0023263039,0.003242397,0.0019687074,0.002096038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076219672,0.00021239753,0.00058823696,0.0017535491,0.008379803,0.010288656,0.0017619377,0.0037932103,0.009831382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028335892,0.0006250023,0.00038519473,0.0012611018,0.023924764,0.011628559,0.0077019166,0.006831444,0.0008355324],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009350077,0.000015005726,0.0008732382,0.00001769657,0.000009638595,0.000082688275,0.003154126,0.00013612153,0.000108475775,0.9892775,0.0010021412,0.005314079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008230051,0.000036358237,0.0034666816,0.00016010675,0.000029453628,0.00018825826,0.004621797,0.0009785324,0.0003971313,0.9345236,0.0554793,0.00003653258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039612693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005179381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010288656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035145765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042538233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04030931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126721633","doi":"","title":"A Genealogy of Political Constitutionalism in the U.K., and Why Canadians Might be Interested (and What the British Might Learn from Canada)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"UCL Discovery (University College London)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Constitution; Politics; Sovereignty; Democracy; Political science; Law; Hegemony; Sociology","score_opus":0.016244953304850183,"score_gpt":0.19848798843448204,"score_spread":0.18224303512963186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126721633","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14865427,0.0151528595,0.0019159754,0.17523746,0.0006877989,0.000047561698,0.000609438,0.00010692477,0.6575877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96720594,0.003091471,0.00048988475,0.0049720365,0.000046566725,0.0000110436185,0.00008548383,0.000053538508,0.024044106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960509,0.00084442156,0.0000761643,0.000501673,0.0008590585,0.0016678905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954235,0.0011037645,0.00018376157,0.00027640234,0.00210139,0.0009111027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026347435,0.00022019846,0.00035137392,0.0017697429,0.021199984,0.013554165,0.0009315038,0.001824288,0.00669397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064547323,0.00025699957,0.00021607465,0.003267089,0.031429064,0.0037795855,0.0021403194,0.0035373028,0.0005479306],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008661288,0.00001326821,0.0031597433,0.000071946495,0.000015364261,0.00031426796,0.052959725,0.00033217476,0.00024952422,0.8906468,0.031644523,0.020505978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033785866,0.000026669633,0.023192773,0.00055200723,0.000037049227,0.00020188233,0.09124799,0.0004703539,0.00039592132,0.07271154,0.8109541,0.00017593667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98350924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98426497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11531874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11531874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08592191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8366999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128993987","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3777108","title":"The Washington January 6, 2021 Insurrection, and Racist and Ethnic Terrorism in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnic group; Terrorism; Political science; Criminology; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.010320745011895248,"score_gpt":0.25619733398760286,"score_spread":0.2458765889757076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128993987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81540024,0.0032281282,0.00008670514,0.0615173,0.000537456,0.00008969402,0.0025379686,0.000018417351,0.116584085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92762774,0.0014715532,0.00007796745,0.0062091104,0.00007726913,0.000032902793,0.00039609434,0.000016143487,0.06409122],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976579,0.000117206,0.00004516893,0.0000929717,0.00040705147,0.0016796321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99626213,0.0003869213,0.00029110306,0.000061348655,0.0012179903,0.001780456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011672026,0.00019904737,0.00044597127,0.0018078586,0.026631035,0.007061699,0.0013390221,0.0032376433,0.009241282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005074875,0.00038416608,0.00043635,0.003024312,0.0035359398,0.0011444815,0.002426106,0.0063556787,0.0004226374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054416055,0.0006307974,0.42274264,0.0002839907,0.00018021592,0.002335074,0.092310995,0.0013365321,0.00060470734,0.16714633,0.25132915,0.06055544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059182672,0.00004966481,0.53496426,0.00036389637,0.000080854945,0.00022818771,0.18521076,0.00059612753,0.00036161998,0.0038548894,0.2740745,0.0001560922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99875045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1245127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1245127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22311775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9034071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130116209","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Dialogue: Right, Democracy, Institutions (Introduction)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Metaphor; Political science; Legislature; Politics; Relevance (law); Rhetoric; Constitutional economics; Constitutional theory; Perspective (graphical); Law; Law and economics; Constitutional law; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.013500372690046255,"score_gpt":0.27048570109425835,"score_spread":0.25698532840421207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130116209","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006757698,0.23734227,0.0050707352,0.08338246,0.0074713426,0.000049653576,0.00028190514,0.00012969342,0.6595142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51794976,0.1610741,0.0056142965,0.032012247,0.029252557,0.00036749733,0.0006156705,0.0002573057,0.25285655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998517,0.0009922407,0.000032043456,0.00013323608,0.0002176305,0.00010789356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998453,0.001158045,0.000095123236,0.00005933537,0.00010786988,0.00012666242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010597743,0.0006107253,0.00056380965,0.0018979704,0.002675309,0.0067495788,0.00083035324,0.003135766,0.016723724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025845058,0.00028924277,0.00030651386,0.0039290516,0.010148933,0.0072178096,0.0025614202,0.0038571586,0.0021747653],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010644714,0.000024047284,0.00014545862,0.000172934,0.0000036851834,0.00008458205,0.004893208,0.00018185536,0.00007428683,0.86082333,0.117899194,0.015686842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009467349,0.000024767496,0.00093036186,0.0005230978,0.0000046108594,0.00021506731,0.0042392323,0.00015016926,0.00003370208,0.21755601,0.7763046,0.0000089739915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043304227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034342522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016723724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003240228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014954987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05594641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130718974","doi":"","title":"Peter Aucoin, Mark D.Jarvis &Lori Turnbull,Democratizing the Constitution: Reforming ResponsibleGovernment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04424122050940862,"score_gpt":0.2707355482931368,"score_spread":0.22649432778372816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130718974","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012176677,0.13299721,0.013438283,0.55897176,0.0030435806,0.0001360895,0.0011282254,0.00013359687,0.2779746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4034971,0.2006265,0.018325564,0.12233321,0.0041908068,0.00046937136,0.00069724914,0.00034955092,0.24951057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780625,0.0007342567,0.00009913864,0.00025859455,0.00071635086,0.0003854757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940713,0.0043592756,0.0003515198,0.0002207303,0.00071451993,0.00028267613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00348105,0.00066590565,0.00048714963,0.0022220016,0.008013988,0.00928911,0.0015375495,0.009614745,0.017290426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0093239155,0.00079147646,0.00059909915,0.0038703193,0.007896253,0.014746984,0.003033752,0.008874135,0.0027994425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005263535,0.00004109736,0.00056517095,0.00018971934,0.00001373827,0.00013916468,0.0023135727,0.0003614468,0.00016917463,0.70026416,0.28381938,0.01207078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007115638,0.000025975412,0.002883545,0.00046242608,0.000035125897,0.000086498876,0.0040615397,0.00036389768,0.001343752,0.48120674,0.50938606,0.0000732688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08060718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2391353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08060718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062487694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075104493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.160276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3131461733","doi":"","title":"Law as a Social Construction and Conceptual Legal Theory","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal positivism; Empirical legal studies; Legal realism; Epistemology; Philosophy of law; Premise; Dilemma; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Sociology; Legal formalism; Political philosophy; Politics; Law and economics; Political science; Legal research; Black letter law; Philosophy; Comparative law; Private law","score_opus":0.008049936317195508,"score_gpt":0.25945944381491337,"score_spread":0.25140950749771784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3131461733","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045864675,0.015027299,0.133901,0.14746734,0.0010552193,0.00012595324,0.00017960972,0.0002085909,0.65617025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9656916,0.004006235,0.014555379,0.0042156246,0.00075663836,0.00022485504,0.00009770803,0.00007456501,0.010377271],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924428,0.0048806733,0.00019972169,0.0007276111,0.0011689126,0.00058028207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936173,0.0039120815,0.0006847597,0.00078329764,0.0005297626,0.0004727758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068685254,0.0006342754,0.0007988643,0.004420342,0.0060434616,0.011412215,0.0026919318,0.00649819,0.005199367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006957441,0.00039654985,0.000925716,0.00436799,0.08823689,0.014898544,0.0049437755,0.0050193206,0.0006773411],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.6724018e-7,0.0000015916551,0.000016597769,0.000004181181,4.1810316e-7,0.0000038437706,0.00020921015,0.000054330307,0.0000044536296,0.9993351,0.00015698194,0.00021314753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037212308,0.000002617893,0.000049645758,0.000017704848,0.0000010432175,0.000012342388,0.0004273942,0.00033019378,0.000011735561,0.9899677,0.009173734,0.000002167914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045096795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030074997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011644847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011644847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070929653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08448964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3132295648","doi":"","title":"Cabinet Immunity in Canada: The Legal Black Hole","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Principle of legality; Constitution; Judicial review; Constitutionality; Statutory law; Separation of powers; Jurisprudence; Statutory interpretation; Common law","score_opus":0.015262079559029947,"score_gpt":0.2667185706266405,"score_spread":0.25145649106761053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3132295648","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045611504,0.016019477,0.0043431,0.47029,0.001565814,0.000076915145,0.00039367392,0.00015611938,0.46154344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8014517,0.009691223,0.002992944,0.11158794,0.0008184735,0.00007839648,0.00013693323,0.000117300915,0.07312511],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899149,0.00088222226,0.00020258415,0.0011308955,0.004562595,0.0033067926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99073607,0.004004858,0.00041222342,0.0003181121,0.002867168,0.0016616383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056455024,0.00046598952,0.00078928354,0.0023532216,0.03069929,0.016044829,0.0037739018,0.015121842,0.012956718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017311562,0.00082617265,0.00066504505,0.002747323,0.028575465,0.0060079847,0.0051992885,0.016098803,0.00057799974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012149479,0.000012316443,0.0008482063,0.000034150733,0.000006543435,0.00022352312,0.0027411985,0.00021368732,0.00007703734,0.9494879,0.035591193,0.0107521005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016177127,0.00004635669,0.008250225,0.00094506657,0.00011268979,0.0003606225,0.011507806,0.003382184,0.0006230038,0.3748215,0.59951025,0.00027840235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98976654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99272776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15550499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15550499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27536583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9794945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133595346","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1408","title":"The Missing Constitutionalism of Canada v Vavilov","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Appeal; Citizenship; Political science; Constitution; Administrative law; Law; Legislation; Argument (complex analysis); Constitutional law; Judicial review; Supreme court; Legalism (Western philosophy); Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.028926299598757338,"score_gpt":0.3183451814879905,"score_spread":0.28941888188923315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133595346","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.108402744,0.022289876,0.0104515245,0.2029612,0.0014845632,0.0001257756,0.0006457294,0.00024150305,0.653397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9346127,0.0036769668,0.0021602563,0.024609828,0.00021002087,0.000044795965,0.000119894976,0.00008416411,0.034481462],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891804,0.0014533346,0.0002786363,0.0016725179,0.0038363314,0.0035787898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960109,0.0014578138,0.00020184988,0.0002630232,0.0011532675,0.00091315835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044208476,0.00029466453,0.0005478311,0.0014461956,0.020308128,0.012648651,0.0026835445,0.004912573,0.004186305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009491167,0.00050118193,0.0005817985,0.0020141725,0.021915747,0.0027437834,0.0034294296,0.007213267,0.00030278772],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000763501,0.0000025201375,0.0005610693,0.000024292745,0.0000073810193,0.00013274126,0.0024778259,0.00017096117,0.00010736672,0.9814518,0.011017181,0.0040391707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045656343,0.0000290468,0.007945829,0.0004385478,0.000084758845,0.00031064972,0.011009204,0.001456884,0.0008573184,0.22682631,0.75078017,0.00021566397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9858683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99127835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14765982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14765982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16554151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9885938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134230150","doi":"10.7202/1075516ar","title":"“A Constitution Similar in Principle to That of the United Kingdom”: The Preamble, Constitutional Principles, and a Sustainable Jurisprudence","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Preamble; Constitutionalism; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Constitution; Political science; Judicial independence; Judicial review; Common law; Liberal democracy; Constitutional law; Democracy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.06545829340970336,"score_gpt":0.3183575097178903,"score_spread":0.2528992163081869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134230150","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048544087,0.091245666,0.030414877,0.23977725,0.0056119836,0.000221627,0.00042823816,0.00010487725,0.5836514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8557742,0.015802352,0.017287929,0.042238448,0.0010096222,0.00024048478,0.0002921344,0.000102751954,0.06725204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953544,0.0017856801,0.00015882902,0.00057809433,0.0013175849,0.0008054012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988506,0.00046193466,0.00009863966,0.000118004995,0.00033927453,0.0001315792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038220899,0.00045167212,0.00038666412,0.0016113112,0.007937555,0.009788317,0.0013286126,0.0053420677,0.0026468087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005037521,0.00035081114,0.00026118284,0.0014220767,0.030365782,0.005524052,0.0030626,0.0069188275,0.00056948845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027688895,0.000002850587,0.00006873407,0.000016195976,8.9156146e-7,0.00007658895,0.003057108,0.000064010404,0.00008017937,0.9867286,0.0063659996,0.0035360968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000953153,0.000019262226,0.0013728166,0.00041186484,0.0000055828145,0.00017567023,0.0062548933,0.00018133392,0.00023857977,0.2827502,0.70853853,0.000041738796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26796904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35181072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26796904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021471288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023630073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53281856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134345006","doi":"10.5539/ilr.v10n1p195","title":"Modernising the Constitution - A Courts Act","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Law Research","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.2035229278818347,"score_gpt":0.4783933693468695,"score_spread":0.2748704414650348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134345006","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016763326,0.041100867,0.011400246,0.29675218,0.005523858,0.0001002076,0.00023206847,0.0001264885,0.62800074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6902586,0.028770793,0.0145826675,0.09616375,0.006715407,0.00042624053,0.00028295454,0.00017124711,0.16262841],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98817444,0.0059406827,0.00048898486,0.0011076736,0.003125733,0.0011625409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98472285,0.009307873,0.0011790022,0.0019664904,0.0022204404,0.00060328585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013492162,0.0004014512,0.00041783307,0.0018055394,0.003061655,0.008064959,0.0010890524,0.010729994,0.006849861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030751934,0.00034436813,0.00045221281,0.0017212377,0.015295103,0.008784588,0.0035546417,0.011076098,0.0013803279],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037758716,0.00000950729,0.000086534026,0.000015072578,0.000002332216,0.0000139060385,0.0005558937,0.00006374002,0.000058640988,0.98345125,0.010617909,0.005121492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018213459,0.000029766232,0.0012873479,0.0004228277,0.000018414099,0.0000664496,0.00067640847,0.00026743906,0.00038575934,0.5520605,0.4447416,0.000025308911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011682599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01428852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013492162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060311286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014490887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07135427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134537905","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3698923","title":"Do Judicial Review Theories Ground Majority Rule in Constitutional Courts?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Judicial review; Exclusionary rule; Supreme court","score_opus":0.021723669263357243,"score_gpt":0.2989299345426077,"score_spread":0.27720626527925046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134537905","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31070817,0.010470247,0.04797168,0.17026535,0.0015218066,0.00020022235,0.00068120373,0.00016351407,0.4580178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98578423,0.0010120772,0.0020158256,0.005073501,0.0011032901,0.00005139203,0.00007102191,0.000028108832,0.004860577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9851457,0.0065475563,0.00052466535,0.0022478104,0.0037596652,0.0017746297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82779866,0.13932681,0.014329077,0.007890676,0.009188889,0.0014658177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02909294,0.00048453905,0.0017339117,0.0041646087,0.003461033,0.008908928,0.0027161737,0.0073210527,0.015763486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1291658,0.00071577623,0.0010198652,0.0031082341,0.01778846,0.016321743,0.0024623524,0.0055125877,0.0017560323],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007355973,0.00006676503,0.002828056,0.00006641652,0.000057465877,0.000056374276,0.00079425715,0.000703273,0.00008139571,0.98048556,0.00347424,0.011312742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008294344,0.000035875022,0.0041134013,0.000058352878,0.000039817573,0.000022393991,0.00065435073,0.001754771,0.00022123862,0.9869337,0.006064228,0.000019001582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005816628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006497463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02909294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038735433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005359886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15385997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134963254","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3762594","title":"Biased Impartiality: A Survey of Post-Rds Caselaw on Bias, Race and Indigeneity","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Race (biology); Political science; Law; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.04832420827637419,"score_gpt":0.32272894320260015,"score_spread":0.27440473492622597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134963254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9214435,0.0064703044,0.002660331,0.018017078,0.00007317243,0.00008706421,0.00050799653,0.000022128013,0.05071829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944378,0.0013613238,0.00032932207,0.0023308413,0.0000764104,0.000028887502,0.000119358694,0.000016162163,0.001299804],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9702602,0.014009764,0.002520012,0.0021051122,0.008185703,0.0029192436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.69270426,0.20067342,0.05243989,0.012580804,0.036886793,0.004714844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05447715,0.0001439194,0.0005636122,0.006649202,0.0038191462,0.005031528,0.0015784447,0.002340433,0.005864493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22115736,0.00041525878,0.00036071832,0.0067639695,0.005369636,0.0048207757,0.0044060075,0.0036758306,0.0006245607],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036411636,0.00025793997,0.62857634,0.00030322984,0.00009219843,0.0005060764,0.06748718,0.0002850135,0.0008717405,0.13792142,0.014567385,0.14876732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032688957,0.00035848634,0.74681354,0.0018885643,0.00009323522,0.0014789155,0.06714242,0.0013139342,0.002164182,0.04210032,0.13648628,0.00012741153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010933702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01606709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9890663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032620884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045797317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2881062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135137383","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqaa055","title":"Is Majority Rule Justified in Constitutional Adjudication?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Majority rule; Voting; Statute; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.08701728811984924,"score_gpt":0.3589860886832909,"score_spread":0.27196880056344164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135137383","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12678194,0.005320617,0.37704083,0.13790421,0.003876199,0.00029562844,0.00032278406,0.00029502655,0.3481628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9622572,0.00053967093,0.02438964,0.006089867,0.001397751,0.00019100064,0.000052478812,0.00007950701,0.005002957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.91863436,0.047566663,0.00397641,0.008112987,0.017542176,0.0041673966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90185547,0.06859009,0.0064372104,0.010869108,0.011113361,0.0011346795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.068614855,0.00040083608,0.0021021233,0.0018119592,0.003816834,0.0070371334,0.003419482,0.0071243797,0.0053720386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12854925,0.00048038535,0.0012843466,0.0015980357,0.019273058,0.009312885,0.003676121,0.007954933,0.0016191354],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005618042,0.00001469991,0.0006044458,0.00004338443,0.000036701567,0.00007930752,0.00047799054,0.00043452918,0.00017357263,0.98551404,0.0024574767,0.010107684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005057792,0.000032191467,0.0003963723,0.00012128581,0.000024690813,0.0000620927,0.00027101094,0.003193451,0.0005981155,0.98561066,0.00961708,0.000022505308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022335513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018539318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.068614855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026344438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037074361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3628744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135434455","doi":"10.7202/1075517ar","title":"The Unwritten Principle of Democracy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Legitimacy; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Law; Separation of powers; Constitutionalism; Constitutional review; Law and economics; Supreme court; Liberal democracy; Secession; Federalism; Relevance (law); Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03076628031883912,"score_gpt":0.31313489364016056,"score_spread":0.28236861332132146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135434455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029138558,0.0031839851,0.0617253,0.037241295,0.00038269963,0.000087311106,0.00014397585,0.00008996572,0.868007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9403074,0.0020974877,0.010968805,0.0034782612,0.00028599869,0.00006378427,0.00009204453,0.00006732375,0.042638928],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920334,0.0021858988,0.0002214314,0.00088276394,0.0033811189,0.0012953485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962702,0.0015052463,0.00027247638,0.0005294269,0.0011780541,0.00024463184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00547603,0.00029751932,0.0005272598,0.0016307484,0.0070519256,0.006773529,0.0015802837,0.001815027,0.004231007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010747567,0.00028213626,0.00034188724,0.0015306628,0.038615428,0.0048240414,0.0037585176,0.0043304595,0.0005340722],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001292287,7.318648e-7,0.000054607164,0.0000059695512,7.219641e-7,0.000009642166,0.0012260668,0.00006852579,0.000031044245,0.9958263,0.0004746878,0.002300462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007404136,0.0000068375266,0.00074471114,0.00009363549,0.0000061103556,0.000043931213,0.001307672,0.0005290761,0.00017050102,0.89482015,0.10225342,0.000016524982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31327266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30646634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31327266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020634914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026664373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6228984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135453247","doi":"","title":"Indipendenza senza autonomia. I delicati rapporti fra potere esecutivo e giudiziario in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Executive branch; Political science; Politics; Government (linguistics); Law; Constitutional law; Executive power; Power (physics); Autonomy; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.033204021030256194,"score_gpt":0.283810711327999,"score_spread":0.2506066902977428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135453247","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41641986,0.010655511,0.0022197473,0.09957691,0.00043475197,0.000080443424,0.0009062962,0.000080219565,0.46962625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96483195,0.0016428918,0.00040943373,0.003149071,0.000047578105,0.000009652712,0.000077115095,0.000033183336,0.0297991],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99518085,0.00050597504,0.00008218031,0.0006871503,0.001604434,0.0019393713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949885,0.0011170403,0.00049887743,0.00016775295,0.0019136086,0.0013141771],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028221284,0.00019704818,0.00037379953,0.0020188477,0.016137913,0.0072895535,0.0009661001,0.0013391249,0.008442816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006430771,0.00028544824,0.00025161752,0.003328062,0.010524686,0.0013224643,0.0022836863,0.0038447855,0.00039340078],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094458344,0.000060932012,0.04339204,0.000207331,0.00005661966,0.00085734774,0.04546973,0.0007768973,0.0011672279,0.7724908,0.070916,0.064510696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005146029,0.000053495696,0.24615139,0.00053201494,0.000120764285,0.00033800388,0.053192712,0.0018284145,0.0011904933,0.039561305,0.65682346,0.00015648046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9897385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99682117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.096079625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.096079625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11676606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6971097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135674495","doi":"10.7202/1075515ar","title":"Rethinking the Invisible Constitution: How Unwritten Constitutional Principles Shape Political Decision-Making","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Constitution; Legislature; Politics; Law; Scholarship; Political science; Warrant; Constitutional law; Action (physics); Government (linguistics); Constitutional review; Judicial review; Constitutional economics; Law and economics; Sociology; Democracy; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0724215343438571,"score_gpt":0.3227976483686118,"score_spread":0.2503761140247547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135674495","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20558856,0.004698283,0.039640825,0.14870492,0.0007333081,0.00006909369,0.00011969452,0.00012588591,0.6003194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888881,0.0004754946,0.0020564466,0.003049749,0.000081967686,0.000016686688,0.000012009139,0.00006293239,0.0053566378],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9842478,0.009106906,0.00024833935,0.0016496294,0.002777653,0.0019695733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841345,0.010935332,0.00075173314,0.0018946471,0.0014545602,0.0008292839],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021529522,0.00021811143,0.0005340152,0.0013575352,0.009144684,0.015495921,0.0023190803,0.003839736,0.00704234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03266857,0.00038945608,0.0005636431,0.0011552551,0.06724965,0.010146429,0.0064688786,0.008504082,0.000521113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007772568,0.000010398692,0.0005129596,0.000014549625,0.0000071227623,0.00004180403,0.007712049,0.00034050594,0.000181983,0.985213,0.0011588606,0.004799008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002690871,0.000018442533,0.0018882301,0.00011363628,0.00002235044,0.000029557496,0.0068874476,0.0009018539,0.0003950878,0.94184357,0.047840916,0.000032029056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04776511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07408733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04776511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015543545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016040245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11386037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135866945","doi":"10.7202/1075518ar","title":"The Structural and Administrative Demands of Unwritten Constitutional Principles","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Administrative law; Political science; Constitution; Separation of powers; Judicial independence; Constitutionalism; Duty; Judicial review; Constitutional law; Politics; Sociology; Law and economics; Democracy","score_opus":0.06304416415205462,"score_gpt":0.32959686365015195,"score_spread":0.26655269949809735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135866945","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15023574,0.002331146,0.21381989,0.05583529,0.00040624625,0.00032599812,0.00022779682,0.0002378178,0.57658005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9692449,0.00048403806,0.018682592,0.0023192896,0.00032418032,0.00028409113,0.00007056888,0.00007552964,0.008514766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9580679,0.017079625,0.0021232655,0.0053440523,0.013258861,0.0041262447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94982314,0.02930294,0.0030199825,0.013034087,0.0036744876,0.0011453823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030802721,0.00040453026,0.00081000937,0.0016631808,0.007000022,0.01298584,0.0035944274,0.0045444095,0.003986159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055425562,0.0010683531,0.0010003509,0.0015722908,0.07003964,0.0116847195,0.006839028,0.010975617,0.00081167603],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003097421,0.0000061069395,0.000099102785,0.000009437618,0.0000020452292,0.000016539687,0.0007905561,0.00023949289,0.00010888931,0.9971124,0.00015063916,0.0014617842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026808328,0.00003181079,0.0007365246,0.00007365449,0.000012933344,0.00007114513,0.0008714191,0.00071282964,0.00038124144,0.9743075,0.022756994,0.000017113516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057924422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01038851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030802721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009511662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014971312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16290236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3136342672","doi":"10.15804/ppk.2020.06.42","title":"Constitutional Protection of Fundamental Freedoms in the Decisions of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2020,"lang":"pl","type":"article","venue":"Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Human rights","score_opus":0.054864199150394664,"score_gpt":0.26582802108103054,"score_spread":0.21096382193063587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3136342672","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046751603,0.007855304,0.008518358,0.038050756,0.0008067369,0.00032110867,0.0016786915,0.0001429213,0.8958745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.894979,0.0037205033,0.006843461,0.01347066,0.00040553842,0.00020896361,0.0004684937,0.000069145346,0.0798342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9845903,0.0020187562,0.00044796368,0.0011756915,0.005996673,0.0057705385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917687,0.0031187595,0.00029287126,0.0005988418,0.0034331526,0.00078768237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007891197,0.00046505567,0.000717999,0.0020761369,0.019269286,0.012302727,0.002167562,0.005031301,0.0047416496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016487487,0.0006911749,0.00077713566,0.003049313,0.013074618,0.0024341596,0.002594357,0.007049766,0.00037873248],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000086387045,0.000005193859,0.0003368016,0.000026560356,0.0000059200784,0.00006183624,0.001738777,0.00034102218,0.00014219127,0.9855994,0.007877694,0.003856093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000075011005,0.000030153522,0.008816981,0.00059633754,0.00008895112,0.0001231081,0.0036355862,0.0021401737,0.001076655,0.2952005,0.68797755,0.00023901071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9759854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9848584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08565758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08565758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22756898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62149215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137172720","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190861551.003.0004","title":"Legal Pluralism in the West","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Legal pluralism; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Legal realism; Legal research","score_opus":0.0409469476398302,"score_gpt":0.28716307814509134,"score_spread":0.24621613050526114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137172720","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04008496,0.009697367,0.0020767478,0.014757849,0.00022262707,0.000014310166,0.000023489707,0.000019815472,0.9331029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9241318,0.0037384417,0.0008571317,0.0032090321,0.00037260287,0.000023334753,0.000021868937,0.000030294968,0.067615435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978192,0.0012008146,0.00006702555,0.00024762738,0.00039340614,0.00027202957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875915,0.0006881546,0.000115778974,0.00017170575,0.0001441415,0.00012113635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019761662,0.0001954828,0.00035696127,0.001353539,0.006792791,0.009133483,0.00047985977,0.0018562574,0.0048588673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020137134,0.00020698555,0.00017143124,0.0014126081,0.021323374,0.0055704853,0.0031668895,0.0033658526,0.00047253675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001421791,0.000004054058,0.00003958351,0.000007521239,4.3989746e-7,0.000034821296,0.007096868,0.000024937688,0.00004097903,0.9897781,0.0010176697,0.0019536219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064132273,0.000015338326,0.0004730581,0.00021334604,0.000005143196,0.00017975991,0.010637725,0.0002708215,0.00023814705,0.6146266,0.37332547,0.000008244876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00658066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009358564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009133483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005247228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027155692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038071454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137495918","doi":"","title":"Two Cheers for a Cabinet Manual (And a Note of Caution)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Prerogative; Law; Political science; Scholarship; Politics; Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.0167320391189875,"score_gpt":0.3386761242722614,"score_spread":0.3219440851532739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137495918","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004336484,0.0030444819,0.004757761,0.95427316,0.0045568272,0.000030722465,0.0000672403,0.00009378643,0.02883952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14440648,0.0029339814,0.016725382,0.71518,0.0035541013,0.00014849074,0.00008317597,0.0003553147,0.11661305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97652286,0.0067132483,0.0008883784,0.0028141895,0.010871148,0.0021902295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96054494,0.018721482,0.0013002635,0.003084395,0.01382808,0.0025209365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021774964,0.0004664435,0.0007004174,0.0012705578,0.0142191565,0.013299038,0.0029909813,0.013116111,0.004055555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056527123,0.0005329148,0.0007585345,0.0012129217,0.031193055,0.013600408,0.0042409142,0.031936817,0.0014318663],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000346311,0.00001736055,0.0008462288,0.000081392594,0.000010965254,0.00024007852,0.01099243,0.000086994674,0.00028172357,0.62926656,0.33741173,0.020729901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002002821,0.000027118716,0.0010803625,0.00028059472,0.000013655616,0.0002050693,0.006098466,0.00029654545,0.0003945978,0.05609528,0.93537515,0.000113119306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4125697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.58094156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4125697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015766473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037363503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8203366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137688563","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3793865","title":"A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF RIGID AMANDEMMENT IN AUSTRALIA &amp;amp; CANADA","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.061511231227156286,"score_gpt":0.3539449151789087,"score_spread":0.2924336839517524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137688563","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9676068,0.00033918684,0.00007180082,0.0008956834,0.000015188532,0.000033836703,0.00013768315,0.0000064572987,0.030893382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890849,0.00023434943,0.00011429201,0.00021280085,0.000003018787,0.000015091458,0.00008373105,0.0000063431007,0.010245539],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955048,0.00071745884,0.00011853768,0.0002280511,0.0012972781,0.0021339713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99156684,0.0019394844,0.0009963664,0.00031695806,0.0037906468,0.0013896712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022695044,0.00016600602,0.00070516893,0.0026607013,0.02193508,0.0042424854,0.0020935335,0.001341662,0.007655363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014697693,0.00036395126,0.0002654691,0.0068666586,0.004762397,0.0013514671,0.0033543825,0.0027657684,0.00040620816],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009244244,0.0005959978,0.25363275,0.0003530197,0.00010351467,0.0036692857,0.4526878,0.0015249527,0.0022487123,0.1559244,0.02322608,0.10510904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036008827,0.00017627388,0.67939633,0.0001770793,0.000051300245,0.00031021115,0.25785425,0.0007656807,0.0004976173,0.0016188434,0.059029613,0.000086808956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9892993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.996876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.068431966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.068431966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07139836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49651098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138550065","doi":"","title":"Precedent Unbound - Contemporary Approaches to Precedent in Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Convention; Political science; Majority opinion","score_opus":0.063769681251808,"score_gpt":0.2554909823418178,"score_spread":0.1917213010900098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3138550065","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025507532,0.015542878,0.032499135,0.051460594,0.00076669053,0.000097174525,0.00031071508,0.00008589053,0.87372935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89213634,0.012153631,0.010378369,0.0067371777,0.00033041244,0.0000809709,0.00016020103,0.00008464679,0.07793835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924114,0.0013226623,0.00024143218,0.0009501732,0.003117565,0.00195682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959716,0.0013454311,0.00023839672,0.0002676928,0.001609234,0.0005676132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034993724,0.0005024303,0.0006875769,0.0036925513,0.025797518,0.013035838,0.0036183351,0.0036937355,0.01116797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009811651,0.00050588313,0.00053848245,0.009086093,0.03337606,0.004797805,0.0047391816,0.008150341,0.00054381654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002681278,0.0000023108948,0.00013115449,0.00001688984,0.0000015681723,0.000035915702,0.0012234764,0.00039760786,0.00001523003,0.99244034,0.0015041827,0.004228513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015392035,0.000015424128,0.0025786546,0.00041371907,0.000025296808,0.000103789534,0.004683735,0.002895627,0.00017401962,0.67818624,0.31083164,0.000076463875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9791707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9842951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17695005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17695005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1945896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95462126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3142234067","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3716791","title":"Statistics as if Legality Mattered: The Two-Front Politics of Empirical Legal Studies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Politics; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.051079886166099035,"score_gpt":0.37768546330030284,"score_spread":0.3266055771342038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3142234067","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02408476,0.02565269,0.030263538,0.8632957,0.0040276553,0.00009386135,0.0005175201,0.00013852322,0.05192577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82298136,0.010608283,0.018947031,0.11898451,0.021134889,0.00040594756,0.00033660783,0.00039465027,0.0062066987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.81640184,0.13183215,0.007770738,0.016134135,0.02399058,0.0038705536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.16482337,0.7790217,0.016657999,0.017594272,0.017465264,0.0044375504],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.31835127,0.00094221416,0.004817007,0.015130658,0.009654985,0.02740877,0.004844338,0.019243581,0.008983862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6452375,0.0014263985,0.0017468785,0.014659005,0.12631513,0.057892285,0.009218773,0.026789589,0.0013701349],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000701061,0.000031609696,0.0025024056,0.00012605677,0.000052152274,0.0000350385,0.0015445548,0.00020190646,0.000051557166,0.97266364,0.009095913,0.013625047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042828076,0.000016250759,0.0014985643,0.0003301114,0.000024415667,0.000028024859,0.0009841569,0.0010745144,0.00013581067,0.98438525,0.01143676,0.000043377368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0085823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066659222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.990345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013179601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011736009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84059423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3142767516","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1407","title":"Deference to Legislatures: The Case of the 2018 Ontario Better Local Government Act","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Legislature; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Judicial deference; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02903838877367183,"score_gpt":0.305100085928771,"score_spread":0.2760616971550992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3142767516","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42269203,0.0039705774,0.003317738,0.18104705,0.0006595489,0.0001836498,0.0002027458,0.000055952634,0.38787076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.955317,0.0007826843,0.00059988117,0.013374975,0.00016411494,0.00007796414,0.000035066,0.000023112847,0.029625202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97647756,0.006383134,0.00059109286,0.0016091692,0.008171657,0.00676741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98153234,0.011156057,0.0012651574,0.00068635395,0.0036884446,0.0016716411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012709723,0.00036371974,0.0006339475,0.0013028242,0.045491,0.009979108,0.0030433899,0.011736993,0.003746942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028730553,0.00072611205,0.0006672051,0.0020706148,0.025651215,0.0043457723,0.005372711,0.012082091,0.00036091608],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007903475,0.000056193185,0.0058069527,0.00012158327,0.000020115427,0.0040337313,0.19276045,0.0007490928,0.0006333773,0.76401174,0.023087814,0.008639962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012742417,0.00007947565,0.022646489,0.00058678846,0.00009645238,0.0006737306,0.13727038,0.0021097146,0.0012462663,0.07738249,0.75752,0.00026071141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8897323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9420218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12098141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12098141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07692424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8777857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3142805592","doi":"","title":"The Study of Legal Plurality Outside 'Legal Pluralism': The Future of the Discipline?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Pluralism (philosophy); Monism; Legal realism; Political science; Law; Politics; Normative; Contradiction; Empirical legal studies; Legal formalism; Epistemology; Suspect; Law and economics; Legal research; Sociology; Philosophy; Comparative law; Black letter law; Private law","score_opus":0.008825240800614772,"score_gpt":0.27767644477218817,"score_spread":0.2688512039715734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3142805592","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011968653,0.12275848,0.020805147,0.6688299,0.0050488715,0.000019420799,0.00003590885,0.00007681712,0.17045677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7694817,0.06569462,0.0128950225,0.06500951,0.029122433,0.00017145525,0.00006658489,0.00019569695,0.057362963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99281037,0.0042563668,0.0001347195,0.00068624574,0.0013337221,0.00077861897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893891,0.0066049593,0.00067270716,0.0014898281,0.0009860275,0.000857338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009515728,0.0004847895,0.0014838983,0.0019013942,0.007569142,0.014176271,0.0025147793,0.009864982,0.006741298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011123035,0.00033254054,0.0009551606,0.0025782334,0.05815532,0.029962592,0.0060824035,0.011791548,0.0012178168],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004003099,0.000011035185,0.000046697824,0.000038768096,0.0000017334999,0.000023257051,0.0013748279,0.00004488244,0.000029536586,0.9884659,0.0051420736,0.004817319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049859827,0.000010384053,0.00009841269,0.00013247055,0.0000014852874,0.000037008656,0.0017600568,0.00022453042,0.000033847205,0.91622233,0.081466794,0.000007695233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005556827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036886346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014176271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077673835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010406895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05635655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3143583593","doi":"10.1017/9781139236249.012","title":"Sovereignty and the Spirit of Legality","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Law; Sovereignty; Parliament; Political science; Rule of law; Parliamentary sovereignty; Economic Justice; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.0357097729379468,"score_gpt":0.2232978202638527,"score_spread":0.1875880473259059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3143583593","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015822249,0.007028899,0.010886878,0.019205965,0.00025286365,0.000017823046,0.000039608658,0.000031187246,0.9467145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94242173,0.0028024605,0.0025550565,0.0031787276,0.00042531634,0.00007456789,0.000043850083,0.00004809894,0.048450224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968412,0.0018518807,0.00008802663,0.00030679573,0.0005655438,0.00034656105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974692,0.0015945819,0.000139064,0.00038714265,0.00026499512,0.00014492204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003739273,0.00026228107,0.00036150907,0.0011578128,0.004003047,0.007407616,0.00071213377,0.00200056,0.0036382244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058297347,0.00031047047,0.00034069055,0.00090803404,0.045980755,0.007055991,0.0045316704,0.0053390376,0.0006646592],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.4866706e-7,0.0000010517697,0.000009827794,0.000002626674,2.8515169e-7,0.0000035331975,0.00045891822,0.000019591256,0.00001003101,0.9987375,0.00032802377,0.0004280081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055628316,0.0000033793738,0.000050180257,0.000030575742,0.0000010597469,0.000013071478,0.00030244162,0.000094504896,0.000029846613,0.9693758,0.030091595,0.0000020119246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044570547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033608705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007407616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047297943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038888128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034317195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3145013333","doi":"","title":"The Costs and Benefits of Constitutional Options for Québec and Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chapters","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Business","score_opus":0.02018647471530021,"score_gpt":0.25117987379127604,"score_spread":0.23099339907597582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3145013333","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28011853,0.005918864,0.00082240085,0.03412114,0.000281581,0.0000802065,0.0009252835,0.00007177634,0.6776602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95365685,0.0013116432,0.0004232639,0.0018501553,0.000045731205,0.000029993833,0.00017463934,0.000019597785,0.042488247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908105,0.001614707,0.00013114655,0.00042747302,0.0031555283,0.0038607204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98717284,0.0051318887,0.00055754435,0.000710664,0.004194316,0.0022326226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004984509,0.00036917112,0.000551096,0.0017713947,0.015043067,0.012917481,0.0027284396,0.0036994254,0.019102264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019637348,0.0003277586,0.00055253395,0.003827884,0.007654099,0.0024001342,0.0030066506,0.0030764458,0.0005096401],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003704616,0.0001193697,0.019308673,0.000116188785,0.00007483905,0.0004962837,0.0039040132,0.0054437793,0.000402255,0.865437,0.058729727,0.045597523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041104885,0.00035476484,0.19141448,0.0013157277,0.0006112432,0.00047080487,0.053513657,0.023550194,0.0013568468,0.1797834,0.5466918,0.00052608806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9839131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9942331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12249867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12249867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09461359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8887942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3145936774","doi":"","title":"A Separate Head of Judicial Review: Divergent Paths in Common Law Rights Review","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Statutory law; Law; Judicial review; Common law; Proportionality (law); Humanities; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02906881381432984,"score_gpt":0.32784598537569914,"score_spread":0.2987771715613693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3145936774","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02988442,0.040028974,0.25801748,0.41039386,0.008720195,0.0024620588,0.00035844662,0.00074746745,0.24938725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6528804,0.016383389,0.14966576,0.074573725,0.009686377,0.0022441165,0.0002885735,0.0006085377,0.093669176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.7135197,0.15063104,0.017582612,0.02760279,0.07390095,0.016762858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.47555357,0.31045413,0.01876471,0.041249964,0.13098323,0.02299439],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.19134218,0.0006544664,0.0018782208,0.0117269475,0.012004606,0.029599687,0.004410375,0.01456771,0.0052033123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31368828,0.0019937588,0.0011449204,0.008251407,0.038526114,0.019230194,0.012017175,0.016286572,0.0014741247],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036318692,0.00004010379,0.00095161784,0.0001875869,0.00003071277,0.0001889219,0.0045505804,0.00045529247,0.00024133516,0.90202576,0.025628675,0.065663055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001467404,0.00019328344,0.0059190122,0.0024197486,0.000093013434,0.00030902514,0.0038238312,0.0039225225,0.001844861,0.34474438,0.6361722,0.00041147062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06930249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10441669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19134218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057663474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14593644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3150649281","doi":"","title":"Marshalling the Data: An Empirical Analysis of Canada’s s. 24(2) Case Law in the Wake of R. v. Grant","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.09477046435274979,"score_gpt":0.3277565290984168,"score_spread":0.23298606474566702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3150649281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97432023,0.0010379133,0.00056993676,0.004038348,0.000026832415,0.00025006256,0.0007585216,0.000013725583,0.01898442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947088,0.00045761917,0.00072969514,0.00078491523,0.000028638155,0.00007965557,0.00067852315,0.000018258006,0.002513907],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9749341,0.00453124,0.0010312023,0.0020847837,0.013787974,0.0036305794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77356696,0.1645838,0.021123147,0.006345955,0.029311584,0.005068494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025395947,0.0003217278,0.00078974484,0.007991669,0.019750796,0.007789383,0.0036095916,0.0028019329,0.003572513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15745836,0.0005454219,0.00044727963,0.01730174,0.012579143,0.0030658233,0.0038943344,0.0049869856,0.00036337142],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00071601244,0.0012090958,0.55121523,0.00045696684,0.00030589526,0.003532089,0.2519571,0.002248827,0.0011878721,0.07960341,0.03377077,0.073796794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015497998,0.00027782316,0.64023954,0.0005871246,0.0002910104,0.0005161083,0.256291,0.0064075617,0.0023734767,0.010079135,0.08243741,0.0003448228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94982165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9795562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060639355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.060639355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057263438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43997133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3151042431","doi":"","title":"The Unbroken Supremacy of the Canadian Constitution","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; White supremacy; Political science; State (computer science); Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Supremacy Clause; Federalism; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.016774236279800066,"score_gpt":0.2879651494642194,"score_spread":0.27119091318441935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3151042431","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.096691616,0.009632296,0.0037327437,0.08643399,0.00073752616,0.00005209442,0.00032462343,0.00006335959,0.80233175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9402786,0.0035581095,0.0016578725,0.0064642387,0.00016279914,0.000025202817,0.00007791971,0.0000327022,0.0477426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99457943,0.00072943774,0.00009498146,0.000678676,0.00237863,0.0015388699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973494,0.000646721,0.00012697218,0.00018635351,0.0013594168,0.0003311631],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035974719,0.00024044725,0.0002912934,0.0014675083,0.01553302,0.0077976976,0.0009096634,0.001941074,0.00402754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070795757,0.00031795376,0.00020077107,0.0016744942,0.022781258,0.0032728314,0.0023040453,0.0043841847,0.00031280066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062925687,0.0000023225844,0.00026948363,0.0000110058045,0.0000014809215,0.000041012867,0.004040331,0.00008993772,0.00014831632,0.9845226,0.0049328734,0.00593445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003827846,0.000025608248,0.012265274,0.00028357535,0.000032958655,0.00011594256,0.007930018,0.00080600835,0.00067408197,0.19493045,0.78280884,0.000088947134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9686447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97654927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.082323946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.082323946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13597608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5973048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154768688","doi":"","title":"Legislating Statutory Interpretation: The Parliamentary Regulation of Judicial Discretion","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Statute; Legislature; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Discretion; Legislation; Law; Theme (computing); Judicial interpretation; Statutory law; Judicial discretion; Judicial review; Legislative history","score_opus":0.01233941976184579,"score_gpt":0.28336822193711086,"score_spread":0.2710288021752651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154768688","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07985759,0.007790747,0.11433854,0.059499744,0.0009019425,0.00008192633,0.000062032086,0.00020028366,0.7372672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9774401,0.00088882033,0.006491475,0.002482153,0.00037143618,0.00010133125,0.000019294072,0.000108501066,0.012096911],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9760049,0.014967325,0.0008098867,0.001670233,0.004543597,0.00200412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980265,0.014328216,0.0017456322,0.002173982,0.0010927997,0.00039434887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017431227,0.0002901299,0.0005607599,0.0014655844,0.006239479,0.010513623,0.0019829934,0.0039036924,0.0030041316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022928085,0.00050709926,0.0004912021,0.0020987492,0.048388902,0.0075906487,0.0036303303,0.0070165717,0.00042535143],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037650352,0.000004673185,0.00013964977,0.000015194319,0.0000023471146,0.000016108032,0.006224588,0.00014174021,0.00018003352,0.9892497,0.00079834904,0.003223718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022559338,0.000030579828,0.0015142981,0.00029278186,0.00001758648,0.00009863272,0.006481797,0.0013986548,0.0011890782,0.8442639,0.14465097,0.00003909322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004410781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065590087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017431227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067298547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066261217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09218627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154912574","doi":"10.1086/714576","title":"The Emerging Authority of Magistrate Judges within US District Courts","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Courts","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Magistrate; Adjudication; Political science; Law; Discretion; Supreme court; Delegation; Hierarchy","score_opus":0.025616823907762352,"score_gpt":0.30600119334209236,"score_spread":0.28038436943433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154912574","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9783724,0.0006975457,0.0008263487,0.00202638,0.000017454608,0.000014486035,0.00012680472,0.000010139497,0.017908426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991365,0.000058693076,0.00007335649,0.00011650314,0.00001184685,0.0000019884699,0.000021841142,0.000001290954,0.0005781151],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934535,0.0023488086,0.00026372602,0.0010380582,0.0013901701,0.0015058123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.973605,0.009714814,0.006351514,0.001338609,0.005888153,0.0031019805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008552971,0.000070863396,0.0002574221,0.0027792673,0.0037350934,0.004370579,0.001094729,0.0008521667,0.00348081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03086601,0.00020910309,0.00016129093,0.001974538,0.0026163282,0.0013857636,0.002404518,0.0014468107,0.00035819036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022928836,0.000093457784,0.8170338,0.00009261074,0.00007381284,0.0004613641,0.05067806,0.000715782,0.0025638836,0.06749647,0.0059979665,0.054563455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013429048,0.00006694639,0.95402074,0.00011297758,0.000036236237,0.000107583655,0.024037646,0.00083460426,0.00074614363,0.006868529,0.013116271,0.00003887299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05210817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17625916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05210817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005470162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033407153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10360974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3156030424","doi":"10.25071/1920-7336.40655","title":"Not Just the Luck of the Draw? Exploring Competency of Counsel and Other Qualitative Factors in Federal Court Refugee Leave Determinations (2005-2010)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Refuge Canada s Journal on Refuge","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Luck; Immigration; Political science; Law; Representation (politics); Psychology; Demographic economics; Economics","score_opus":0.08430602922756548,"score_gpt":0.33323567828207185,"score_spread":0.24892964905450637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3156030424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879673,0.00030471434,0.00046977244,0.003597411,0.000026627518,0.00006694119,0.00014198587,0.0000058246524,0.007419409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99747604,0.0001748244,0.00023716124,0.00043065054,0.000006276957,0.00004850292,0.00005342149,0.0000075552616,0.0015654912],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903413,0.0048710746,0.0005377515,0.00057692284,0.0022289278,0.0014439663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9472993,0.034998175,0.0064738216,0.0011884082,0.0070148194,0.0030254351],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024841104,0.00014670311,0.00032358672,0.002972591,0.009208291,0.007173312,0.0014395027,0.0010158254,0.0031228676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07988452,0.0003714975,0.00019568496,0.002719512,0.010561471,0.003836759,0.0036652316,0.0020924332,0.00021967359],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036706988,0.00005314263,0.07788246,0.00009990849,0.000007635396,0.00031370294,0.90401614,0.000060574042,0.00040056382,0.004130045,0.0019228052,0.011076426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022250024,0.00001613609,0.053090908,0.00015935213,0.0000039350502,0.00006106532,0.9395495,0.000087733875,0.00015209461,0.0003437553,0.006517528,0.000015679896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3828947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6160863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97376853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026231466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02039486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76133204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3156787638","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3633","title":"The Relevance of Government Practice in Constitutional Decision-Making: A Review of the Supreme Court’s Federalism Jurisprudence","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Relevance (law); Government (linguistics); Federalism; Law; Political science; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.043166527319637486,"score_gpt":0.379245248506796,"score_spread":0.3360787211871585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3156787638","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016322378,0.9974228,0.000055188757,0.0012439522,0.00009132166,0.0000022486975,0.000007730853,8.171465e-7,0.0010127492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005360867,0.99342537,0.00012828688,0.0007951582,0.00015374838,0.0000051568036,0.000016560687,0.0000021051897,0.00011275215],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99437594,0.0021975068,0.0005722575,0.00053172844,0.0020762603,0.00024632097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.963753,0.03029773,0.001276269,0.0004734971,0.0038212615,0.00037817252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009166624,0.0005579718,0.0015851319,0.009727754,0.001842476,0.0042186296,0.0012483038,0.0026817697,0.0016965485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023610178,0.0006444391,0.0007556504,0.017964259,0.0067936215,0.0032598935,0.0018260524,0.0036705034,0.00032163947],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059116042,0.000062173145,0.0016662508,0.06464912,0.00034867608,0.00020077701,0.003332227,0.0008883011,0.00044382724,0.106943734,0.03212548,0.78928035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016434748,0.00006526461,0.0080603575,0.10009968,0.00036011604,0.00027702763,0.0019987777,0.00014305505,0.00023943577,0.014768186,0.8739221,0.0000494502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14276291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23684435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14276291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013489085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044153687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28386384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3156867361","doi":"10.25909/28891115.v1","title":"NO AMENDMENT? NO PROBLEM: JUDGES, “INFORMAL AMENDMENT,” AND THE EVOLUTION OF CONSTITUTIONAL MEANING IN THE FEDERAL DEMOCRACIES OF AUSTRALIA, CANADA, INDIA, AND THE UNITED STATES","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pepperdine Digital Commons (Pepperdine University)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Democracy; Law; Meaning (existential); Constitutional amendment; Political science; Politics; Original meaning; Originalism; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011718585945748953,"score_gpt":0.22358262644079838,"score_spread":0.21186404049504942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3156867361","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6432408,0.0028395825,0.0042462046,0.045233723,0.00029080495,0.00004390182,0.000043500353,0.000045624423,0.3040159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99541265,0.00014676909,0.00036553948,0.0006790069,0.000027226586,0.0000095650075,0.0000075239673,0.000011734726,0.0033399793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891322,0.005420299,0.00018951703,0.0009441461,0.0021752606,0.0021385106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99019146,0.0049960557,0.0012009302,0.00087870145,0.0017814785,0.0009513953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008160821,0.00014878967,0.00032724655,0.0013764474,0.013250432,0.011633739,0.0009544488,0.0021381124,0.0017551567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027763253,0.00021346948,0.00025807825,0.0015725916,0.053489465,0.004214263,0.004114352,0.005582511,0.00012439913],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003876891,0.00002751433,0.0052987537,0.000021004846,0.000008386636,0.00018571722,0.075046204,0.00037492535,0.00024292857,0.9033665,0.0020912734,0.013297978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010684034,0.00011246428,0.048281502,0.00035501798,0.00006748066,0.00022931621,0.102786504,0.0022375325,0.0011256933,0.60619855,0.23833491,0.00016435163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18783958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26016614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81216043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01886931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017274756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37349242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157144089","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Courts in Federal Countries. Federalists or Unitarists?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.014579046010599997,"score_gpt":0.3083440828601392,"score_spread":0.2937650368495392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157144089","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008677266,0.9488535,0.00014890333,0.019957481,0.011914676,0.000026988442,0.00043533285,0.000049171667,0.01852715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017016615,0.92673963,0.00032807703,0.015179535,0.008710721,0.000080670085,0.0007714272,0.000063644504,0.046424735],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986527,0.00028469373,0.000111733534,0.00013738166,0.00071856705,0.000094828654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937499,0.0030517075,0.0005076804,0.00012203086,0.0022732823,0.0002952763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001178621,0.0010196534,0.002148388,0.0046391347,0.0009108029,0.004538479,0.0015849401,0.0027828498,0.052329794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008379356,0.0006291943,0.00063956797,0.012270674,0.0013655176,0.004027517,0.0011625622,0.003512311,0.024560409],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006467531,0.0000036617357,0.000024233163,0.00094098074,0.0000078931935,0.000010930234,0.000025005838,0.000031256885,0.000017448883,0.0010441984,0.95851076,0.039377246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000775875,0.000007694467,0.0002795986,0.0027799068,0.00001674114,0.000091039736,0.000062755054,0.000019132678,0.00001858535,0.0010648498,0.99564373,0.000008159423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013499154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03597989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052329794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038101948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008682209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17506057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157468406","doi":"","title":"Has the Supreme Court of Canada Rejected ‘Originalism’?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queen's law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Law; Original meaning; Constitutionalism; Supreme court; Constitutional law; Constitutional theory; Political science; Scholarship; Sociology; Politics; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Democracy; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02278282913622767,"score_gpt":0.25779704028941336,"score_spread":0.2350142111531857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157468406","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07218443,0.011501393,0.0014920097,0.65498483,0.0026194977,0.000038708426,0.00035257736,0.00007734907,0.2567492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8672434,0.0034758262,0.000721893,0.09774965,0.0006931415,0.000015787678,0.00010911799,0.000053363205,0.029937776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879376,0.0012948196,0.00019063235,0.00117807,0.0050110277,0.0043877605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849899,0.004849096,0.0006661044,0.00063400116,0.007367561,0.001493381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007805774,0.00027377906,0.0006106604,0.0014684007,0.025795514,0.013990762,0.0037068687,0.00958859,0.0042645093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024979698,0.00031007675,0.0005765288,0.0031239055,0.030321158,0.0043489924,0.0025771142,0.008871275,0.00036967843],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028397593,0.000011750528,0.0022009634,0.000079646365,0.000022516142,0.0003698078,0.009597502,0.00019622446,0.00013511992,0.87853825,0.09317094,0.015648982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006454304,0.000028092114,0.011463304,0.00045716306,0.00008362437,0.0002740544,0.023427986,0.0010740807,0.00076007436,0.14151151,0.82064366,0.00021187404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9834109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9824539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13811472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13811472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16458385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157557574","doi":"","title":"Oxford LibGuides: Canada : legal resources: Legislation : provincial & territorial","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Law; Business; Public administration","score_opus":0.025300442343208388,"score_gpt":0.25543467491921523,"score_spread":0.23013423257600685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157557574","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007628402,0.15984505,0.0009682733,0.027027039,0.0028578069,0.00010872078,0.04774035,0.0005577773,0.75326663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02686195,0.04131158,0.0012591254,0.0013264853,0.00026808993,0.000074681964,0.0044221976,0.00028684767,0.92418915],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992902,0.00006985436,0.000055556415,0.000086280335,0.00035588775,0.00014220054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982287,0.00024650284,0.00009756246,0.000059656766,0.0011367032,0.00023085183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006790597,0.0012138088,0.0008202333,0.0045382464,0.007831661,0.008868488,0.0013061988,0.0031209176,0.1559569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025524793,0.0010942797,0.00042742013,0.022117807,0.002164806,0.0033238966,0.0013195549,0.00328969,0.009982152],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028466186,0.000017790426,0.0014204693,0.000546891,0.000010394981,0.00013890423,0.0014305211,0.00039689222,0.000075907585,0.051562842,0.8802002,0.06417074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000650685,0.0000037492055,0.00589385,0.0006771528,0.000009746612,0.000046514717,0.0020338185,0.00010105913,0.0001081151,0.0023067456,0.98878956,0.000023234912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97943085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.993747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1559569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.055857055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.109017976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5217278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158348143","doi":"10.1111/gove.12594","title":"Institutional proximity and judicial corruption: A spatial approach","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Governance","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; Politics; Language change; Context (archaeology); Political science; China; Complement (music); Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.0272471462032246,"score_gpt":0.2656881602014818,"score_spread":0.23844101399825718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158348143","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6403578,0.003420792,0.13264717,0.0100499205,0.0001375274,0.0001738995,0.00043145195,0.000119269,0.21266225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99741876,0.00026582714,0.0015494046,0.000037124548,0.000017442175,0.000015827032,0.000021153635,0.000003879565,0.00067044253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975726,0.0014347675,0.00010119637,0.00032689492,0.00032808736,0.00023644976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99537104,0.0017822826,0.0014388073,0.0005029617,0.000598102,0.00030672183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014572005,0.0003072693,0.00042724152,0.004220868,0.0024420924,0.0050419397,0.0010279454,0.0009564606,0.008756817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008212711,0.00028045097,0.0006489439,0.00395948,0.01019664,0.0055339076,0.0064168805,0.0007322497,0.00040310976],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032011667,0.000045324436,0.043061707,0.00013546212,0.000035383197,0.0003767307,0.0057327976,0.0068937796,0.00020934593,0.92787194,0.0006734763,0.01493196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064909764,0.00019528023,0.106321745,0.0005615075,0.00023397048,0.0011153308,0.0457393,0.04684573,0.0007272513,0.75966936,0.03844283,0.000082857034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007998498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066276593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008756817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036170753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021498166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02929449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158489386","doi":"","title":"The Use of Non-domestic Legal Sources in Supreme Court of Canada Judgments: Is this the Judicial Slowbalization of the Court?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Empirical legal studies; Empirical research; Perspective (graphical); Comparative law","score_opus":0.018528258978921353,"score_gpt":0.2499574918052835,"score_spread":0.23142923282636216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158489386","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76312375,0.017879853,0.0030494304,0.026726635,0.0005798166,0.00012681635,0.0026693635,0.00012011976,0.18572412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98695683,0.003425951,0.00043565177,0.00095754454,0.0001297575,0.000014289498,0.00037320316,0.0000479981,0.00765872],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98743385,0.0011154319,0.0005131503,0.0011921787,0.007875673,0.0018697124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94741946,0.014113276,0.009902576,0.0027470323,0.022323387,0.0034943137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062412675,0.00022789897,0.00047443848,0.009474833,0.009952371,0.011167542,0.0015904459,0.0013746782,0.0034339975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0563261,0.00028280818,0.00023193043,0.018268682,0.0055607148,0.00428404,0.0030169066,0.002502476,0.0004855479],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011250586,0.000079998106,0.30647948,0.00072438666,0.00019684252,0.0032717164,0.20326747,0.0009499805,0.0017255647,0.18344834,0.060526684,0.23921706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019952704,0.00004948289,0.47502452,0.0018439515,0.00018710962,0.0015946805,0.122403935,0.0014282297,0.0027191269,0.017734665,0.37672985,0.00026453886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84709895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9597584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15290105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03603225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.064931415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.307603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159992687","doi":"","title":"On the Limits of Proportionality","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Normative; Legitimacy; Rationality; CONTEST; Law and economics; Assertion; Norm (philosophy); Paragraph; Political science; Law; Economics; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.04444817373152012,"score_gpt":0.3024261887617236,"score_spread":0.2579780150302035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159992687","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036512382,0.010632928,0.1535145,0.10690981,0.0010677446,0.00008974956,0.00011496553,0.00022002499,0.6909379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94386834,0.0027948748,0.019997118,0.013716054,0.0015055931,0.00031726365,0.000055629673,0.0002563442,0.017488878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97777677,0.011691879,0.00071184605,0.0033935928,0.0051553766,0.0012705928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9581973,0.031309575,0.0014941399,0.0049996255,0.0032419518,0.0007573251],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026449071,0.00058656355,0.00095245714,0.0021850585,0.006120124,0.011783532,0.00212334,0.0049586417,0.0063838945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052328333,0.00059296784,0.0008715758,0.0012110313,0.064470135,0.022153342,0.008161732,0.013188913,0.0012696444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018843593,0.000001948807,0.0000224989,0.0000046422065,0.0000011355263,0.0000050062417,0.00018896126,0.000049987826,0.000013731782,0.99860805,0.000260214,0.0008419931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004359583,0.0000029048704,0.000026397978,0.000016966911,0.000001369204,0.000008407076,0.000062983774,0.00015187872,0.00004556766,0.9943283,0.005348072,0.0000026456864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002011682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011112574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026449071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005412516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00414597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13987774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159992947","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190075774.003.0012","title":"Conclusion The American and Westminster Models","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Political science; Human rights; Law; Supreme court; Judicial review; Politics; Charter; Common law; Democracy; International human rights law; Legislation","score_opus":0.04697883692099785,"score_gpt":0.28744259304928504,"score_spread":0.2404637561282872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159992947","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009012129,0.00056810817,0.0034259888,0.0051987693,0.00007628996,0.000015860716,0.000082824285,0.000019270386,0.98160076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6027004,0.0016620843,0.0032864374,0.0036685104,0.00015309523,0.00008875728,0.00015875963,0.00006491399,0.38821697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962807,0.00015018118,0.0000067963665,0.000053197986,0.000084034815,0.00007777756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963343,0.00012317716,0.000028190976,0.000060167247,0.00008543371,0.00006948799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005231804,0.00029751452,0.0002449067,0.0008820112,0.0016434165,0.003868323,0.0007640914,0.0014012046,0.056617983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012783727,0.00012398169,0.0003452165,0.0009907584,0.0032213617,0.0037903986,0.0015883989,0.0019331513,0.0036239745],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017396911,0.000003827782,0.000036984038,0.000002379391,4.7256455e-7,0.000009768676,0.00011435971,0.00014737654,0.0000044044396,0.996293,0.0021752517,0.0012104582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000099658655,0.000004834589,0.00029107588,0.000059734833,0.0000036392883,0.000054754997,0.0007269728,0.0021874541,0.000033952496,0.88891244,0.1077097,0.000005429292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021764835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018328264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056617983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032741914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016499817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18940598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160425844","doi":"","title":"The Role of Constitutional Courts, A Comparative Perspective: The Supreme Court of Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Original jurisdiction; Political science; Certiorari; Court of record; Jurisdiction; Judicial independence; Constitutional court; Constitution; Constitutional law; Judicial review; Law of the case","score_opus":0.009795059525455362,"score_gpt":0.26541806858976996,"score_spread":0.2556230090643146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160425844","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049092975,0.07135341,0.0015829566,0.064638875,0.00062619,0.00004328526,0.00037227912,0.00003600884,0.81225395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9213036,0.027584003,0.0013510928,0.008048498,0.00027102436,0.00003263089,0.00016241256,0.00004941079,0.0411973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933183,0.0016000413,0.00010683795,0.00047421604,0.002435256,0.0020653335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99566203,0.0017492259,0.00018629941,0.0001427194,0.0016634522,0.00059622154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031939582,0.0002988247,0.0005274369,0.0049795425,0.025775528,0.01777383,0.0021189405,0.003982737,0.0070705446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007809505,0.00036884678,0.0003247555,0.009005309,0.018626856,0.0060346634,0.0025884754,0.003929559,0.0002825702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008325302,0.00000601845,0.0005825541,0.000054071246,0.0000071314066,0.00014501395,0.0053497823,0.00022800716,0.00006993029,0.976982,0.008710709,0.007856358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003148487,0.000031637926,0.0131302,0.0010244668,0.000081918035,0.00028496384,0.037232846,0.0012511027,0.00033595363,0.16876632,0.77771324,0.00011574979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97927666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99062485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8428532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15714678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12957415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97759026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160732781","doi":"","title":"The Unwritten Principle of Democracy","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Interpretation (philosophy); Legitimacy; Political science; Law; Separation of powers; Constitutionalism; Relevance (law); Supreme court; Law and economics; Constitutional review; Secession; Federalism; Politics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009112665712134647,"score_gpt":0.28057566925096455,"score_spread":0.2714630035388299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160732781","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023734558,0.003671334,0.03609658,0.037121706,0.00037984882,0.000094231866,0.00017553914,0.0000864425,0.89863974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9115139,0.002543607,0.008349572,0.004566653,0.00030685985,0.000069357266,0.0001181701,0.00006868606,0.07246314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921395,0.0019138427,0.00021274899,0.0009862029,0.0031256198,0.0016220838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99780685,0.0007146607,0.00017277652,0.00033225256,0.0007774169,0.00019597124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035975985,0.00033961458,0.00048141702,0.0013337757,0.0076595987,0.006994738,0.0014953364,0.0021037043,0.004821327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065891286,0.00029477384,0.00037553904,0.0013608426,0.036036983,0.0036684286,0.0032160303,0.0036452992,0.0005597592],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016650653,5.928656e-7,0.00007735863,0.000009293483,9.914683e-7,0.000019692981,0.0016298288,0.000081293656,0.0000376507,0.9950027,0.0009141351,0.0022247913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013391007,0.000008977668,0.0013208467,0.00015451375,0.0000112405505,0.00008301976,0.0023956366,0.0006454136,0.00026529675,0.7433461,0.25172794,0.000027669652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6100983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6415126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6100983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0393678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034635894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7843958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161683026","doi":"10.1353/llt.2021.0011","title":"The Class Politics of Law: Essays Inspired by Harry Glasbeek ed. by Eric Tucker and Judy Fudge","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Labour / Le Travail","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Capitalism; Law; Sociology; Economic Justice; Critical legal studies; Legal profession; Political science; Legal realism","score_opus":0.013976544223066423,"score_gpt":0.24821355834672015,"score_spread":0.23423701412365372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161683026","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013344088,0.7168279,0.00042052835,0.22580515,0.009271815,0.000014642983,0.00012514547,0.000013277316,0.046187088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12824152,0.6595436,0.0015424483,0.06333622,0.025797587,0.00019355208,0.0002867996,0.00020637452,0.12085191],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979657,0.00098628,0.000070921065,0.00025822505,0.00048692204,0.00023199587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974611,0.0017196366,0.00019707713,0.00009277951,0.00030304218,0.00022638659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027755785,0.0013943678,0.0010268067,0.0027092462,0.0059895464,0.0076370044,0.0014605778,0.005743174,0.00618275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006316525,0.00068760966,0.0004934918,0.0045061805,0.01400615,0.0076065636,0.002747817,0.0046862685,0.0020996262],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002482071,0.000026788643,0.0002213189,0.00026735777,0.000010015971,0.00008568949,0.007089953,0.00010721325,0.00012498451,0.095700115,0.8699594,0.02638239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015566899,0.000004904662,0.0014061256,0.0014082748,0.000006592377,0.00006266333,0.004354819,0.000034111694,0.00007044446,0.04015083,0.9524714,0.000014197999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046186555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.084862836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046186555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011528486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09183544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161718383","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190075774.003.0002","title":"The Common Law Legal Tradition: First Things First","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Law; Common law; Public law; Comparative law; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Private law; Sources of law; Municipal law; Judicial review; Legal history; Supreme court","score_opus":0.03570353943683208,"score_gpt":0.25373519576677883,"score_spread":0.21803165632994675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161718383","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008066467,0.037636735,0.0129705975,0.050925083,0.0012473505,0.000064584434,0.000053677144,0.000042674557,0.8889929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7258323,0.03727948,0.013033294,0.02426066,0.0039457823,0.00022238248,0.0001289116,0.00015706303,0.19514012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99567634,0.0020796864,0.00010299328,0.0004355052,0.0013450745,0.00036041625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952939,0.0028632602,0.00023785539,0.00041651868,0.00097728,0.00021103148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036543715,0.00022966036,0.00041737882,0.0018189689,0.0039752554,0.008984532,0.0008424127,0.0023637242,0.0058752284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060324785,0.00025194712,0.00026446063,0.00213854,0.025030553,0.008135572,0.0026343488,0.007235514,0.0009893412],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.479588e-7,0.0000021270807,0.000025662717,0.000008965668,4.3708408e-7,0.000007914008,0.00066593586,0.00001603624,0.000009141489,0.99475396,0.0022745486,0.0022346333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045399097,0.000013197441,0.0003812222,0.00038970937,0.0000028535478,0.000081488535,0.0012510887,0.0001889837,0.00010269473,0.5411339,0.45644176,0.000008565017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063017034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074426676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008984532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075470586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053966963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054758072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161763644","doi":"","title":"The Sovereign Citizen Movement: A Comparative Analysis with Similar Foreign Movements and Takeaways for the United States Judicial System","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Political science; Movement (music); Political economy; Sovereign state; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.02946900266551563,"score_gpt":0.2776280789108696,"score_spread":0.24815907624535397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161763644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66470194,0.0044683507,0.00048254436,0.0066181435,0.00017936938,0.000052229097,0.00008429852,0.000015962552,0.3233972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859891,0.0015548395,0.00017850734,0.0018767058,0.000073061456,0.00003478811,0.00009855038,0.000034977264,0.01015951],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971004,0.001027916,0.00008280849,0.0002676353,0.00040640714,0.0011147654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99697053,0.0015860201,0.0004698832,0.00020385186,0.0004174914,0.00035206927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028182906,0.00021888518,0.00039013923,0.0040376675,0.014594361,0.0087724645,0.0008744115,0.0032974177,0.0057721133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006261248,0.00021434975,0.00049242756,0.006463848,0.008184402,0.0046683475,0.0033243438,0.0045588785,0.00038375868],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009082274,0.00019395669,0.029892465,0.0001850047,0.000033987664,0.0030728453,0.4191543,0.00019302555,0.00062220404,0.4937976,0.018909166,0.033854596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002035857,0.00010100118,0.12492299,0.00068337,0.00004473044,0.0008839254,0.6165583,0.0003227116,0.0006371854,0.009377701,0.2463982,0.000049483097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.069075786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1996718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.069075786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008904775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040120897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13734746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162093189","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190075774.003.0003","title":"The Diffuse and Second Look Models of Judicial Review","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Supreme court; Judicial review; Political science; Law; Statute; Judicial independence; Duty; Legislature; Democracy; Constitutional law; Separation of powers; Politics","score_opus":0.046526235912078634,"score_gpt":0.27984802004986076,"score_spread":0.23332178413778212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162093189","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009386142,0.011107292,0.07769044,0.018366465,0.0005853592,0.000110539164,0.000090711714,0.00012652208,0.8825366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7647748,0.012913256,0.022409512,0.0072179306,0.0015190348,0.0003262576,0.000116573625,0.00012235875,0.1906003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907511,0.0043007415,0.00018366145,0.00075387483,0.0035878704,0.00042276853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98845714,0.0066929976,0.000645001,0.0014898938,0.002353565,0.00036129402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060329475,0.00032038896,0.00050565874,0.0018108211,0.001275893,0.0089316545,0.0012812,0.0022148916,0.008511979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014393865,0.00029279693,0.00062945223,0.0015176083,0.0109699145,0.0054891678,0.0018574974,0.003728575,0.0017336261],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032143737,0.000003585079,0.000036163638,0.00001680396,0.000002282987,0.000009894927,0.000102165206,0.00037458361,0.000033764,0.9928774,0.002528407,0.0040116976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022136977,0.000023303395,0.00026349167,0.00016353364,0.00001154132,0.00011483172,0.00018076645,0.003277115,0.00015506324,0.92275965,0.07301272,0.000015807509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028492631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033376939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0089316545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006222675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046373317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04514891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162140798","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190075774.003.0006","title":"Canada: From Privy Council to Supreme Court","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Federalism; Judicial review; Separation of powers; Charter; Constitution; Politics","score_opus":0.07304754403190365,"score_gpt":0.24602819489990807,"score_spread":0.1729806508680044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162140798","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15802324,0.016960131,0.0009896284,0.054603785,0.0005924057,0.000114946735,0.0015853674,0.00014111478,0.76698947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88482285,0.0068461234,0.00094323145,0.008469262,0.0001581224,0.00002771526,0.0003903328,0.00005579341,0.09828655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99331206,0.0003744868,0.00007167314,0.00049286545,0.003904971,0.0018439664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99003255,0.0011699174,0.00048592137,0.00017330925,0.0061114654,0.0020268273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014969946,0.00015217326,0.00022585716,0.002401186,0.011360905,0.008594601,0.0008812656,0.0015781238,0.011245472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071462793,0.0003052779,0.0002341394,0.0033726771,0.0044602314,0.0013860184,0.0014148941,0.0025580833,0.0005206423],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097087424,0.000072923314,0.038494337,0.00031389768,0.00004031815,0.0009369913,0.010751046,0.0014635401,0.0007863605,0.6483845,0.20794372,0.090715274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027264521,0.000053978973,0.12047105,0.00076062063,0.00005859177,0.00019617616,0.00768769,0.001024589,0.0007421238,0.010011713,0.8588722,0.00009402452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9918921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82113314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17886686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23221621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95239806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162154867","doi":"","title":"The Supreme Court in a Pluralistic World: Four Readings of a Reference","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Narrative; Legal pluralism; Pluralism (philosophy); Notice; Sociology; Legal realism; Legal research; Epistemology","score_opus":0.052601149057472034,"score_gpt":0.31238572306016793,"score_spread":0.2597845740026959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162154867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18101202,0.015106174,0.013748846,0.11321999,0.00080971187,0.000101849124,0.00015073859,0.00010119174,0.6757495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811436,0.001154576,0.0012485608,0.0025580113,0.000121549456,0.000037479,0.0000300356,0.000039619474,0.01366659],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864049,0.007400308,0.00027312915,0.0011175815,0.003158606,0.0016455827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99466634,0.002762158,0.00033625335,0.00033217316,0.0012934392,0.0006096341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058327317,0.00082813634,0.00074100087,0.0028618767,0.033430632,0.025794322,0.0033648836,0.008657673,0.002145731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0107013425,0.00048942,0.00049856794,0.0049450286,0.07749498,0.010168952,0.0074442737,0.009964698,0.00019701477],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007022565,0.000006496026,0.00019547009,0.000016840251,0.000002723413,0.00021804786,0.12962605,0.000113570124,0.00008429889,0.8655127,0.0022576265,0.001959208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019514539,0.000039995626,0.0017108717,0.00053967535,0.000023851162,0.00021970487,0.29316166,0.0011568749,0.0003643719,0.45003054,0.2526313,0.000101618076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5694635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55988866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5694635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08036469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03616997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86614406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163025946","doi":"10.1093/icon/moab041","title":"Ely in the world: The global legacy of Democracy and Distrust forty years on","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distrust; Constitutionalism; Democracy; Context (archaeology); Politics; Sketch; Political science; Subject (documents); Sociology; Law; History","score_opus":0.02208313572474602,"score_gpt":0.3365698722796519,"score_spread":0.3144867365549059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163025946","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1252499,0.09545368,0.0025872998,0.41904095,0.0017476154,0.00001358877,0.00017591256,0.0000557106,0.35567537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93493396,0.020651478,0.000491041,0.021577287,0.0012406519,0.000016625618,0.000049135695,0.000065939465,0.020973843],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800974,0.0009111855,0.000042498043,0.00031443278,0.00031868424,0.00040347772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996358,0.0021970752,0.00030308662,0.00037800078,0.0004357298,0.00032805122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037298666,0.00020601723,0.00042398114,0.0015402223,0.0048424355,0.0075380714,0.00032055855,0.0019319417,0.005177907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045232605,0.00017163061,0.0001846486,0.00203331,0.018731419,0.0074683377,0.004552104,0.0043552783,0.00036611178],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040737028,0.000022754544,0.0020638218,0.00008881788,0.000014841796,0.00024582693,0.030379798,0.0003054437,0.00009858246,0.88660914,0.031948943,0.04818122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012037258,0.000028559509,0.0047468985,0.0005953627,0.000011051616,0.00016780857,0.014508129,0.00021469595,0.00021453343,0.23097338,0.7484966,0.000030920208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009073655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012696357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009073655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058144797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024572976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042187214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163237934","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0135","title":"The notwithstanding clause: Legislatures, courts, and the electorate","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Constitution; Charter; Legislature; Law; Supreme court; Constitutional law; Judicial review; Free Exercise Clause; Law and economics; First amendment; Sociology","score_opus":0.010382390662058916,"score_gpt":0.2284526592122968,"score_spread":0.21807026855023787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163237934","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08351675,0.005919698,0.021027703,0.042137362,0.00048662428,0.000116350246,0.00024902166,0.000085036765,0.8464614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96276003,0.0012831951,0.0029012659,0.0043703816,0.000142324,0.000060204657,0.00005408912,0.000031349853,0.02839714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943534,0.0015060743,0.00011600603,0.0005109601,0.0015986946,0.0019148382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997373,0.0012702637,0.00025679014,0.00019545533,0.0006164577,0.00028804806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041646915,0.00023488665,0.0003831146,0.0011918922,0.010635237,0.010585396,0.0014083319,0.0035750195,0.0052837017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007002224,0.00039430245,0.0002682968,0.0019800975,0.024411265,0.0040098475,0.001931372,0.003966301,0.0003119314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020001162,0.0000014973978,0.0002193857,0.00000367288,7.033976e-7,0.000010906155,0.0009996614,0.000067004636,0.000028913777,0.9965552,0.00080852705,0.0013024937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004716684,0.00004634737,0.011389693,0.00027785092,0.000050553965,0.00008467496,0.008877839,0.0013898987,0.0006952825,0.6639538,0.31309557,0.00009128345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7005215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8114443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29947847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022527993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043720827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6024843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163857638","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190075774.003.0001","title":"Introduction The Birth and Growth of Judicial Review: 1607–2020","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Judicial review; Supreme court; Political science; Legislation; Law; Certiorari; Judicial activism; Constitutional review; Separation of powers; Constitutionalism; Politics; Democracy; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.019182760212388798,"score_gpt":0.2565804292573535,"score_spread":0.23739766904496473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163857638","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015269368,0.19404848,0.0049730386,0.09020965,0.011144764,0.000090971655,0.00023078723,0.00012631704,0.69764906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11221757,0.16229613,0.0067743855,0.05302405,0.02800621,0.00031093418,0.00050331745,0.00039440417,0.636473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937755,0.0022280738,0.0003205356,0.00088694174,0.00245233,0.00033658926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891199,0.0061360896,0.0004283178,0.00060325756,0.0031804286,0.0005319142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004914177,0.00037320453,0.0004497371,0.0031266762,0.0026379593,0.0076801353,0.00086990726,0.0045379167,0.019214867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01395348,0.00049775786,0.00030530963,0.0027049966,0.009164606,0.006193859,0.0019959612,0.004924298,0.006507117],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000096379645,0.0000108991635,0.0001285432,0.0001516371,0.000002767716,0.000055437267,0.0005467086,0.00017204853,0.00009993994,0.6431524,0.29033998,0.06532997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022174436,0.000005451866,0.00027523492,0.00041238786,0.0000010225891,0.0000501791,0.00009548547,0.0000979771,0.000046701556,0.03705623,0.96194935,0.000007681196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009197513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0109083755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019214867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010188693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075725922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07392454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164875351","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3711","title":"Section 24(2) in the Trial Courts: An Empirical Analysis of the Legal and Non-legal Determinants of Excluding Unconstitutionally Obtained Evidence in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Charter; Nova scotia; Law; Empirical evidence; Section (typography); Political science; Ideology; Criminal trial; Criminology; Psychology; Sociology; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.06963850624137194,"score_gpt":0.3425073395442349,"score_spread":0.27286883330286293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164875351","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97572577,0.0018290102,0.00021254609,0.0038515637,0.000053402517,0.00010210276,0.0025254618,0.000012258764,0.015687928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951885,0.00079676777,0.00016900139,0.00038734492,0.000017504675,0.000017162129,0.00085868227,0.000010650203,0.0025541957],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888108,0.0010711426,0.00065085856,0.0011055048,0.004958133,0.0034036136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9431274,0.012460457,0.013567162,0.0013969584,0.017548505,0.011899487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056921626,0.00025715717,0.0007772793,0.0033382522,0.009689456,0.005701429,0.0026083742,0.0012408722,0.0045557786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04103654,0.00046978836,0.0005985755,0.008829063,0.0036270132,0.0010506975,0.0023930387,0.0032665874,0.0005075255],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028526905,0.00015443377,0.9465158,0.00017319697,0.00012939778,0.00090149476,0.011897031,0.00076801353,0.00035523812,0.0039838376,0.014250273,0.020585967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030616247,0.00003588959,0.97401494,0.00021387728,0.00006615323,0.00016286464,0.012147117,0.0008010457,0.00017484011,0.0005307548,0.011767862,0.000054031847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99310875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99762803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061003584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061003584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11993183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44261402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165671465","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3853161","title":"Positive Charter Rights: When Can We Open the ‘Door?’","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.014992486225050719,"score_gpt":0.280954363664995,"score_spread":0.26596187743994426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165671465","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04701293,0.0027039226,0.010243328,0.5421166,0.0021129886,0.00006414853,0.000103973805,0.00012093353,0.39552122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95697135,0.00078890513,0.0017729625,0.029237317,0.0012823195,0.00010018743,0.000040309107,0.00009665448,0.009709855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9683239,0.01619716,0.0005404173,0.0020872075,0.007192386,0.0056588906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93439347,0.041458845,0.0056780777,0.005705968,0.0065581687,0.006205503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031610914,0.0004873677,0.0010340357,0.0017032081,0.009020168,0.018072847,0.0035129688,0.011436428,0.033502314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11938194,0.00052588526,0.0006134447,0.0015719704,0.05456239,0.03774345,0.008166867,0.016607951,0.0025929394],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013037013,0.00003939518,0.00037684743,0.00002337257,0.0000031442157,0.000019327303,0.0016248585,0.00004066375,0.000044780107,0.98139244,0.01005342,0.006368711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038576945,0.00002631354,0.0010484036,0.00017164212,0.000010302084,0.000034111992,0.0048451005,0.00016274372,0.0002563362,0.94844425,0.044935733,0.000026436488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039049122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055988217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033502314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046601193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0113466475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16717654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167311908","doi":"","title":"The Magnetism of Moral Reasoning and the Principle of Proportionality in Comparative Constitutional Adjudication","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Adjudication; Constitutionality; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Politics; Law and economics; Constitution; Constitutional law; Normative; Rule of law; Sociology","score_opus":0.022918598634681674,"score_gpt":0.309985333843503,"score_spread":0.28706673520882137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3167311908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049630165,0.011181247,0.3293593,0.06995388,0.0016016301,0.00016729797,0.00008931999,0.00012709238,0.53789014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.951356,0.0015600299,0.0339442,0.0034417254,0.0011176497,0.0003502056,0.000027358625,0.000084861975,0.008117981],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95121574,0.041300092,0.00085052976,0.0020818526,0.003310932,0.0012408207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97957164,0.016357392,0.0010397644,0.0018197054,0.00090853166,0.0003029512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030440617,0.00048553632,0.0007256721,0.0026824677,0.006184332,0.009321648,0.0016623061,0.003535226,0.0029490609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03989238,0.00068644027,0.00090256444,0.0018675,0.07407501,0.015587678,0.0071127857,0.007258076,0.00037162504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043140853,0.0000014457985,0.000029202356,0.0000063914695,0.0000014967504,0.000006412815,0.00045025715,0.00007186695,0.000015010969,0.9981261,0.00012656793,0.0011609346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010846884,0.000008421427,0.0000828367,0.00003102178,0.0000025114502,0.000015734184,0.00019584244,0.000363979,0.00005929553,0.9908982,0.008325582,0.000005786185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00388105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027017337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030440617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01062216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052750325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16098726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167887312","doi":"","title":"Book Review - The Tenth Justice: Judicial Appointments, Marc Nadon, and the Supreme Court Act Reference, by Carissima Mathen and Michael Plaxton","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Appeal; Dissent; Statutory interpretation; Political question; Supreme Court Decisions; Majority opinion; Politics","score_opus":0.012885390712471837,"score_gpt":0.2753724618283115,"score_spread":0.26248707111583963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3167887312","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003627651,0.7709852,0.00045551825,0.07579237,0.05198988,0.000032569373,0.0003061625,0.000065472035,0.10001009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006291607,0.6147217,0.0006250118,0.045968592,0.041903466,0.00007365945,0.00055831467,0.00014175502,0.2897159],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987878,0.00022342753,0.000057143712,0.00013657616,0.00070003356,0.000095051364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99579775,0.0017631158,0.00022930521,0.000110992354,0.0018177103,0.00028120689],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095872744,0.00068767776,0.0008748757,0.0023633474,0.0020415208,0.004984793,0.0011852782,0.002366715,0.028027946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007042753,0.00050449243,0.00035764527,0.004563048,0.0022143228,0.003425822,0.0010022909,0.004268117,0.015506952],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029678245,0.0000042925344,0.00003264814,0.00014897734,0.000001470444,0.000013407641,0.00007202803,0.000024402381,0.000016898828,0.0045131454,0.9774639,0.017705914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015472233,0.0000030354702,0.000180989,0.0004123258,0.0000015752393,0.00003646765,0.00008466377,0.00000900064,0.000008475857,0.0008718829,0.9983865,0.0000036440895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.080771044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18259946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9918072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008192752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011605541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1606018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167951243","doi":"","title":"Section 1 Charter Analysis of Trinity Western University v. The Law Society of Upper Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; Adjudication; Political science; Supreme court; Jurisdiction; Sociology","score_opus":0.02281852912145022,"score_gpt":0.24493666717034543,"score_spread":0.22211813804889521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3167951243","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07324209,0.0010897698,0.003990172,0.027741667,0.001064439,0.0006679445,0.0027358586,0.00013956957,0.8893286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68244153,0.0013020474,0.0049380576,0.037120264,0.0003413499,0.0006220189,0.0012390028,0.00010371777,0.27189198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9831892,0.001409445,0.00032698418,0.0013648673,0.009629219,0.0040802625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885847,0.0034658627,0.0005909081,0.0004411778,0.006051802,0.0008656401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00615749,0.00048196502,0.00061061647,0.0024521856,0.014697439,0.007094793,0.0020738316,0.004527684,0.0066249226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017053852,0.0006526803,0.0007957701,0.0022736639,0.00568632,0.0017157496,0.0018704836,0.0073585603,0.00069176825],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052519375,0.000039848353,0.0048738,0.00008287181,0.000021483354,0.00046522825,0.006545346,0.00045751748,0.0005030379,0.8833877,0.0934671,0.010103589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008540792,0.0001583089,0.042324863,0.000902897,0.0002555199,0.0003199807,0.012473032,0.0025245212,0.00459154,0.083102696,0.85290897,0.0003522812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9356036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.975841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9464992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053500775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12521617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3881771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168073923","doi":"","title":"Dance Me to the End of Law (Rules, Laws and the Dance of Diversity)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Dance; Beauty; Diversity (politics); Law; Aesthetics; Focus (optics); Sociology; Political science; Art; Visual arts","score_opus":0.02276691561186714,"score_gpt":0.2767466914468743,"score_spread":0.2539797758350072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168073923","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017289605,0.048000988,0.0023606257,0.55345756,0.008347297,0.00001951438,0.00006798702,0.000061014525,0.37039542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5079392,0.022752076,0.0019023083,0.103088826,0.004476084,0.00007444401,0.000040730607,0.00015007243,0.35957628],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988213,0.0006902192,0.0000171881,0.00009866969,0.00021861953,0.00015405397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983165,0.0008877588,0.00010361639,0.00007158718,0.00025332437,0.00036713135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001452226,0.00022741471,0.00018406815,0.0006991755,0.008348346,0.007430159,0.00052389305,0.002668331,0.0053533316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048348536,0.00015459405,0.00017740532,0.00081607566,0.014650873,0.004304993,0.002020696,0.004560445,0.0008940277],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010808372,0.000014942619,0.00048399455,0.000037540744,0.000003573876,0.00008395511,0.020748049,0.000076359654,0.00008551974,0.6412346,0.32019147,0.017029352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008307278,0.000012421101,0.001209414,0.0001996403,0.0000023948955,0.00008353782,0.027951984,0.00008152264,0.00010392684,0.10211,0.86822385,0.000012879185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08018362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1618529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08018362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050048246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042441334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15943378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168989791","doi":"10.1017/9781108539296.002","title":"The Constitutive Power of Law and Courts","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Power (physics); Political science; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.02573328580782259,"score_gpt":0.22982614295191187,"score_spread":0.20409285714408928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168989791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046335836,0.035918858,0.0053106016,0.020856066,0.0005761913,0.000018764107,0.000116793504,0.000044872988,0.93252426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5590352,0.024918426,0.003898048,0.005356153,0.0028169223,0.00025183306,0.00022332802,0.00020962686,0.40329057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790287,0.0010737615,0.00007041809,0.00022209901,0.0005889651,0.00014188752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99758506,0.0017522936,0.00009641411,0.00029978922,0.0002010846,0.00006534371],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022599343,0.0006179688,0.00063508895,0.001998188,0.0027509872,0.011469699,0.0011728917,0.0044139754,0.0192135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005272481,0.0005549862,0.00022370157,0.0027019961,0.032327145,0.009529225,0.0020993704,0.004462275,0.0024911158],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.680218e-7,0.0000024552166,0.000007131293,0.00000952773,5.0761633e-7,0.0000041726744,0.00037828294,0.000016726919,0.000013734409,0.99509877,0.0027334057,0.0017342907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047767267,0.0000016483071,0.00006934727,0.000079594734,0.0000015123437,0.000012514399,0.00038942441,0.000060073922,0.00003930415,0.9069484,0.09239063,0.0000026726027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007148835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00910459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0192135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063753375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045294315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06427556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169942846","doi":"10.22091/csiw.2021.6676.2026","title":"The Exclusionary Rule in the Criminal Law of Muslim Countries and Common Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statute; Jurisprudence; Common law; Political science; Position (finance); Sharia; Criminal law; Islam; Civil law (Civil law); Sociology; Law and economics; Public law; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.22793505118456583,"score_gpt":0.5395878784240091,"score_spread":0.3116528272394433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169942846","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49989083,0.0063277595,0.05202965,0.008012451,0.00027949768,0.00030107418,0.00028535674,0.00003114421,0.43284225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99384296,0.0004322152,0.0034696544,0.0003119156,0.00004651535,0.00007060545,0.00003917878,0.0000031738277,0.0017836828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99136835,0.004711827,0.0007097713,0.0008041509,0.0018152652,0.00059067225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98778814,0.0075583044,0.0024244373,0.001061803,0.00094792695,0.0002194695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052593728,0.00019155636,0.0003296762,0.0019549243,0.0035091515,0.005061444,0.00067453954,0.0012245242,0.0022591765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012920869,0.00017508374,0.0003673946,0.0023356646,0.018258234,0.0034716884,0.0023082406,0.0019197188,0.0002664949],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015031796,0.00002087197,0.002818485,0.000046719062,0.0000078620005,0.00009816313,0.004167207,0.00021633416,0.00010225365,0.9867901,0.00028938244,0.0054276064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003609632,0.00013926283,0.038236592,0.00058824336,0.000067876455,0.0007992628,0.019006198,0.0032075124,0.0010792708,0.86653537,0.070227005,0.000077424105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048856423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046755117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052593728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002523154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004382006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027814567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169950524","doi":"10.1111/hith.12212","title":"6. PROXIMATE CAUSATION IN LEGAL HISTORIOGRAPHY","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Theory","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Legal history; Historiography; Law; Legal realism; Variety (cybernetics); Causation; Legal formalism; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Empirical legal studies; History; Rhetoric; Legal research; Comparative law; Political science; Black letter law; Philosophy; Private law; Mathematics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.018300063730922515,"score_gpt":0.2410568732754194,"score_spread":0.22275680954449686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169950524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41390046,0.04521467,0.02854619,0.02317007,0.0011538549,0.00027822412,0.0008902314,0.00023021988,0.48661602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799811,0.007503653,0.00325474,0.00071883673,0.0005411517,0.00006382279,0.00022861398,0.000058856218,0.007649369],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98884916,0.006563076,0.00073249923,0.001025063,0.002317985,0.0005121802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88157785,0.09290166,0.01338644,0.004526476,0.0061759823,0.0014315799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012309386,0.00032744944,0.00040799254,0.027058618,0.003291479,0.014413381,0.001134121,0.0015623248,0.018196642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06882085,0.00049504096,0.00036014445,0.024678634,0.009503063,0.013552801,0.0053332825,0.0016477016,0.001200647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009959591,0.00010832956,0.112750076,0.0011227587,0.00007974667,0.00090528146,0.10597013,0.00055036065,0.00036856363,0.701633,0.004120219,0.07229202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047970378,0.00014214353,0.1588836,0.004637057,0.00016390129,0.0018379398,0.16842307,0.0020333927,0.0023888573,0.35270196,0.30864072,0.000099375706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003762776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044578905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027058618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004122179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002987089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06509906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170320986","doi":"","title":"Canada's First Act: The History and Role of the Interpretation Act","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Legislation; Statutory interpretation; Law; Political science; Statutory law; Interpretation (philosophy); Legislative history; Judicial interpretation; Parliament; Politics","score_opus":0.005602989789462042,"score_gpt":0.21561247832229305,"score_spread":0.210009488532831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170320986","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0078120613,0.08541066,0.0059529818,0.29503572,0.009035618,0.00020452516,0.0028897172,0.0004019464,0.59325683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3653652,0.09775853,0.018645767,0.18435113,0.0035158007,0.00048710266,0.003837036,0.0011911485,0.32484832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9576731,0.004544135,0.0013208761,0.0034673335,0.026138643,0.0068559847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95296425,0.012645509,0.00134799,0.0022106506,0.025506448,0.005325174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015255655,0.000999434,0.0010238347,0.006547504,0.02619685,0.02405757,0.004694358,0.009614295,0.008376939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042463135,0.0011591972,0.00082470954,0.012511814,0.04224513,0.006555685,0.004623078,0.018406427,0.0018580483],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002394976,0.000013212735,0.0008555495,0.00019076404,0.000009688914,0.00016165311,0.006358231,0.00020957604,0.00011330293,0.6969849,0.26082724,0.034251936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075543735,0.000005065434,0.002374828,0.0007032754,0.000012332923,0.000057675195,0.0017452524,0.00014078175,0.000109124885,0.0121211205,0.9826512,0.00007181924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99171877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99117976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25791386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.25791386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.455305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86071473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170514750","doi":"10.31078/consrev712","title":"The Implementation of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in Canada: Between Utopia and Reality","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Fundamental rights; Cultural rights; International human rights law; Linguistic rights; Rights of Nature; Utopia; Political science; Right to property; Social rights; Charter; Law; Reservation of rights; Jurisprudence; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.06773358781522724,"score_gpt":0.38336330997958884,"score_spread":0.3156297221643616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170514750","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09031632,0.07121645,0.0038148412,0.17513351,0.0013385504,0.00017422519,0.0005820173,0.000082120656,0.657342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92854345,0.021904107,0.0022650252,0.014279144,0.00025440424,0.000043583575,0.0001425646,0.000046478264,0.03252127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98665106,0.0018509324,0.00043242276,0.0010928435,0.006169789,0.0038028879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990897,0.0040059336,0.00040224506,0.00042372773,0.0033842663,0.00088684395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007984572,0.0003262155,0.0004689432,0.0031253046,0.024291458,0.0166887,0.0022120073,0.0038374495,0.0027485238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01780062,0.00036181693,0.00032388358,0.005634362,0.037110217,0.0029213685,0.003567116,0.006760053,0.00014321574],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059804543,0.000008072531,0.00081712956,0.000082651604,0.000006330525,0.00016912204,0.008109477,0.00026130435,0.000101419384,0.9639677,0.0129503785,0.013520463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022810258,0.000028018112,0.0152463345,0.0013477134,0.00006691532,0.00023771555,0.028876007,0.000980063,0.00077767146,0.12395248,0.8282887,0.00017555214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99362046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9958526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20007396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20007396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3646822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92780083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170833626","doi":"","title":"The Challenge of Diversity in a Multinational Federation: the Impact of the Judiciary on Pluralism in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Political science; Law; Constitution; Nomination; Charter; Supreme court; Rhetoric; Judicial independence","score_opus":0.04712162325057034,"score_gpt":0.3015334131619888,"score_spread":0.25441178991141844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170833626","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28041863,0.010727032,0.002129079,0.27014017,0.0007883621,0.000053435277,0.00013473078,0.00003901304,0.43556955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98327625,0.0013626632,0.00049860973,0.0054002316,0.00009148296,0.00000957542,0.000011742123,0.000010265228,0.009339327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929798,0.0017518259,0.00012194933,0.0005702969,0.00198018,0.0025959855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903593,0.00421717,0.00047092824,0.0002597334,0.0027969417,0.0018958427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060980218,0.00017628347,0.00047310666,0.0016220756,0.045873318,0.012650981,0.0016506496,0.0035788398,0.0025523214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01397583,0.00024765826,0.00031704447,0.0030372129,0.025726888,0.0026135624,0.0045257392,0.005716622,0.00009798432],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003432996,0.00001504673,0.0038394935,0.00005234085,0.000016437141,0.0003680211,0.043325268,0.00077626493,0.00019502145,0.91668016,0.020904034,0.013793489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065337714,0.000060103357,0.039104298,0.0008089067,0.00012370691,0.00025804382,0.13879813,0.004568883,0.000821528,0.20207657,0.61307275,0.00024173976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98907274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99502546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17213896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17213896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18958434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96020144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3171376590","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3144327","title":"Let's Be Frank: Judicial Deference, Expats, and the Right to Vote","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Military College of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Judicial deference; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01197642459192169,"score_gpt":0.2721341356311738,"score_spread":0.2601577110392521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3171376590","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45575252,0.002341637,0.0031243318,0.120443255,0.0004956206,0.000028491468,0.00015617258,0.000020491929,0.41763753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918291,0.00011377167,0.00008807487,0.0020805225,0.00007440274,0.000007460869,0.0000075973053,0.0000046239606,0.0057944776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932962,0.0028173397,0.00017684262,0.00055093743,0.00089290563,0.0022657397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97343487,0.019469641,0.0026155103,0.0012102091,0.0017018468,0.0015679187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008870705,0.00016640396,0.00047738332,0.000770106,0.0077678207,0.007033872,0.001236011,0.0065450324,0.013599902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048019774,0.00025220908,0.0002860667,0.0009386779,0.01738041,0.0054750512,0.0030260247,0.008054228,0.0008381192],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012247977,0.0001215118,0.005323449,0.000018805718,0.000010975295,0.00025407414,0.0072896834,0.00021284618,0.00009542821,0.9686151,0.009594791,0.00834093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011497629,0.000070779526,0.011329759,0.000093714,0.000037364905,0.00019792991,0.01366961,0.0006244309,0.00026631335,0.9387521,0.034799024,0.000044075437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013162211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022813302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013599902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020893558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047774594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046913326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3171772895","doi":"10.1017/9781316823330","title":"Proportionality and Judicial Activism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Judicial activism; Supreme court; Judicial independence; Discretion; Judicial discretion; Constitutional law; Constitutional court; Judicial review; Constitution","score_opus":0.041910288089830425,"score_gpt":0.2613865396820902,"score_spread":0.21947625159225975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3171772895","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009631804,0.004970197,0.0041689705,0.0077905674,0.0002140613,0.000022900394,0.000013214983,0.0000127259955,0.97317547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83002347,0.0054792147,0.0030126458,0.00438604,0.0010701683,0.00012306566,0.000047189995,0.000053337535,0.15580481],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99625117,0.0020432016,0.00007454221,0.00046554324,0.00073994254,0.00042564532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977654,0.0015658753,0.00015939605,0.00020863744,0.00019472833,0.00010593317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002825586,0.00023542295,0.0002488151,0.00115367,0.0031913253,0.005043062,0.0007044637,0.0014938576,0.006314275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055322545,0.00014371479,0.00025010377,0.0010871988,0.01786554,0.0041061896,0.0030260822,0.0033822944,0.00065307505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014730385,0.0000045535767,0.000029389435,0.00000783395,7.15596e-7,0.000008517073,0.0008434722,0.000033854627,0.000043076914,0.9937988,0.0013699093,0.0038584743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009834191,0.000013162802,0.00048905745,0.00011190185,0.00000390969,0.00004773855,0.0009979493,0.00018700382,0.00028402157,0.83145726,0.16639392,0.000004219303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012701954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014401766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006314275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003382703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002254966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024543285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172430832","doi":"10.1017/s0008423921000354","title":"Between Populism and Juristocracy: The Republicanism of Rainer Knopff","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Skepticism; Political science; Law; Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Constitutional theory; Law and economics; Populism; Scholarship; Constitutional law; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.030687907149505526,"score_gpt":0.3098959499446334,"score_spread":0.27920804279512784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3172430832","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08799391,0.009978372,0.005334556,0.45335236,0.00072819606,0.0000299082,0.000042678115,0.000042548596,0.4424975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9574125,0.0013770174,0.00077871257,0.018036779,0.0002357941,0.00002219664,0.0000064376723,0.000029087058,0.022101535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99302787,0.0036067436,0.00008368082,0.0007656929,0.001530977,0.0009849771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992388,0.005667353,0.0002979468,0.00038858852,0.00078080205,0.00047726376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007946082,0.0001625869,0.0003471806,0.0011006754,0.012999086,0.007188317,0.00088337535,0.0038719226,0.0029224756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01275777,0.00027525445,0.00020074885,0.0011815716,0.042401846,0.0040393183,0.0033351043,0.005190673,0.00024868138],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055723717,0.0000056501035,0.00020389531,0.0000061147675,0.0000016225359,0.000053125746,0.0072073527,0.00008557816,0.00004246308,0.9822297,0.007471322,0.0026875336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022080434,0.000011972533,0.0012371835,0.00016071343,0.000007993526,0.00012087633,0.010178715,0.0008167296,0.00038568262,0.7017537,0.2852604,0.00004392408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20801912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19263554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20801912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023431737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01600591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41361666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172672511","doi":"10.1093/icon/moab046","title":"Dialogue and distrust: John Hart Ely and the Canadian Charter","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Distrust; Context (archaeology); Law; Skepticism; Sociology; Judicial review; Politics; Political science; Epistemology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016983065412624468,"score_gpt":0.2754866363459421,"score_spread":0.25850357093331766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3172672511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09078228,0.01017982,0.0038696765,0.3774989,0.0010111901,0.00009492827,0.00012455543,0.000070533126,0.5163682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93755865,0.0023812093,0.0011852861,0.021018352,0.0002893096,0.000031559077,0.000020402826,0.000042275675,0.037472945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98014015,0.006086208,0.0003136319,0.0016446173,0.007538128,0.0042772777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96945,0.01826784,0.001021225,0.00094591704,0.007833139,0.002481886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01524815,0.00031182254,0.000567433,0.0027028737,0.040227734,0.015357493,0.0020670993,0.0074533303,0.0062468746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025858693,0.00046756127,0.00039496814,0.0026067721,0.054609515,0.005846817,0.0058347033,0.00914376,0.00029488403],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023463883,0.000022715963,0.0007771204,0.000029570296,0.0000060743055,0.00023315781,0.03399057,0.00041218117,0.00011663356,0.9282325,0.025925728,0.010230254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007282083,0.000044441273,0.0062080882,0.000442387,0.000039385402,0.00019833645,0.060654875,0.0022841124,0.0008281691,0.26999024,0.65893644,0.00030083852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9557649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9603912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12991776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12991776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12717168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94262373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3173481014","doi":"","title":"Chang's Parity: An Alternative Way to Challenge Balancing","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Intuition; Parity (physics); Premise; Human rights; Maximization; Epistemology; Positive economics; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Philosophy; Political science; Microeconomics; Physics","score_opus":0.03588919667236481,"score_gpt":0.32968836672647295,"score_spread":0.29379917005410816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3173481014","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0575235,0.0009036821,0.53300095,0.057382014,0.0014594699,0.00034159483,0.00021634059,0.00037880833,0.34879357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9141912,0.00027868157,0.061531693,0.009862671,0.000679672,0.0006478954,0.00006345474,0.00013537346,0.012609395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9801588,0.010589813,0.00068974186,0.0027960986,0.0047150315,0.0010504876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98048395,0.0120331645,0.0015126198,0.003376043,0.0020034637,0.0005907246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020868376,0.0011428087,0.0014535914,0.0033998017,0.0032081888,0.0062081725,0.003722117,0.0061640297,0.0096510695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0551082,0.000605434,0.0019265917,0.0028986698,0.018548135,0.016311435,0.008806841,0.009928096,0.0009167905],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012191239,0.0000064643345,0.000081662976,0.0000101084925,0.000005610342,0.000019889838,0.00017868585,0.00021267161,0.000086621105,0.9959292,0.0006459383,0.0028109318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021237216,0.000034681714,0.000067493405,0.00001874453,0.0000073814876,0.000042909684,0.00009080974,0.0015353856,0.00022112472,0.9927127,0.0052366154,0.000010975093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00095581746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00068341737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020868376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049892385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041901534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11036384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3173580499","doi":"10.1017/9781108283618.008","title":"Declarations, Injunctions and the Declaration Plus","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Declaration; Political science; Law; Negotiation; Human rights; Contempt; Mediation; Harm; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04340906735938081,"score_gpt":0.2313283309319595,"score_spread":0.1879192635725787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3173580499","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01139616,0.016221743,0.0077249394,0.0109718265,0.0008680364,0.00003656888,0.000051269784,0.000064499385,0.95266503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5867864,0.013850967,0.0067326147,0.010430851,0.0007869494,0.00015481033,0.00012958581,0.00009694918,0.3810309],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789125,0.00071761356,0.000103672064,0.00021172024,0.00082574727,0.00024987932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985682,0.0009862978,0.00013344258,0.00014651092,0.00010500963,0.000060556853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023618697,0.00036762338,0.0002466123,0.00096397713,0.003270213,0.004031094,0.0007810727,0.0020122086,0.0042023854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029596274,0.000281847,0.00027819112,0.0012386427,0.014597763,0.003538379,0.002146082,0.0038253556,0.00095202756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016719101,0.0000040390773,0.00003895203,0.00001775065,5.3474264e-7,0.000022972714,0.00070487725,0.00011742992,0.000051335344,0.98949885,0.0039743255,0.0055672256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071158565,0.000022676386,0.00051712734,0.00023673048,0.000004885245,0.00019653572,0.000992919,0.0002460448,0.00028765074,0.43831357,0.5591582,0.000016597678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007175061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009451089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007175061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003893363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047435784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02824843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174061900","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3841037","title":"How Constitutional Rights Matter: Thoughts on the New Gold Standard in Empirical Constitutional Studies","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional law; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.038103333762679374,"score_gpt":0.32839887397535816,"score_spread":0.2902955402126788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174061900","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006689816,0.016602846,0.033807836,0.9020906,0.0028813644,0.00007247643,0.00021816988,0.00007131013,0.037565675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6989925,0.013638396,0.047792703,0.20809391,0.021053594,0.0010021618,0.00031429992,0.00042105012,0.0086914515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94909143,0.036765326,0.0019025201,0.0048689772,0.0060375426,0.0013342383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7680697,0.20286639,0.0047233417,0.012629196,0.008946102,0.0027653102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10087348,0.000991444,0.004001367,0.0057329014,0.0072715986,0.021293918,0.006275095,0.018279841,0.008172501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18331644,0.00086119806,0.0014320953,0.005786163,0.12526934,0.04645522,0.008507727,0.023979906,0.0010477623],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012382029,0.000014951683,0.00017555458,0.00005094907,0.000010249715,0.000014305211,0.00081494305,0.000099778554,0.000017012211,0.99003416,0.006195014,0.002560671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014237205,0.0000021899311,0.00009078317,0.00007300297,0.0000031783861,0.000005250923,0.00048089304,0.00017853071,0.000016562875,0.9950198,0.0041093836,0.0000062248237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006544977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00700629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10087348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008878229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009053831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53347635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175260927","doi":"10.38127/uqlj.v40i1.5643","title":"Judicial Activism and Constitutional (Mis) Interpretation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The University of Queensland Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Sheridan College","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Judicial activism; Law; Constitution; Interpretation (philosophy); Judicial interpretation; Judicial review; Doctrine; Political science; Separation of powers; Project commissioning; Politics; Publishing; Sociology; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.016461759099501122,"score_gpt":0.24189701933531674,"score_spread":0.22543526023581562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175260927","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17405811,0.0047946326,0.040700886,0.044283435,0.0005770002,0.000057745023,0.000029971496,0.000048784386,0.73544955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933913,0.0003541525,0.0008112404,0.0013448511,0.0002393811,0.000027497115,0.000005320432,0.000015992646,0.0038104204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9721584,0.018594803,0.0008511726,0.0021691492,0.004076292,0.0021501144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95732474,0.033723913,0.0035384803,0.002996639,0.0018000347,0.00061620126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017087888,0.00033895893,0.000521967,0.0019765433,0.0070039784,0.010741474,0.0014922594,0.004490437,0.0034237157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030368518,0.00030966284,0.0004283981,0.0013112613,0.05750318,0.007904218,0.008121609,0.008525721,0.00031026953],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004817113,0.000005335986,0.00032838556,0.000017184264,0.000002773791,0.00010306449,0.011633732,0.00010182966,0.000099238445,0.98429006,0.00042193176,0.0029917946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014444893,0.00003418964,0.0012377374,0.0002048284,0.000014428784,0.00043005176,0.014006694,0.0008254443,0.0007594529,0.917885,0.06456927,0.000018546158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012415017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016426342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017087888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043362016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029192332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.090370476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176722936","doi":"","title":"The 2018 Toronto Municipal Election -- Judicial Failure to Protect the Structure of the Canadian Constitution","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Appeal; Constitution; Law; Political science; Legislation; Supreme court; Judicial review; Legitimacy; Democracy; Legislature; Constitutional review; Politics","score_opus":0.010233373989834649,"score_gpt":0.2557024748163947,"score_spread":0.24546910082656004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176722936","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13076219,0.0062821256,0.005035281,0.19115984,0.002389204,0.00050839235,0.0022511482,0.0002690192,0.6613428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79152447,0.0019824032,0.00325449,0.022114214,0.0004243508,0.00019190901,0.00038927433,0.00009269464,0.18002625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9848739,0.0010894828,0.00042010559,0.0012751601,0.007883725,0.004457656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98787224,0.0026295653,0.00041545497,0.00062664255,0.0068841446,0.0015719966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007287929,0.00035152372,0.00044280608,0.0013478345,0.025021413,0.008397974,0.002314811,0.0043495786,0.005068631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020974271,0.00066253863,0.00050299865,0.0015024142,0.010240228,0.0014086082,0.0028418894,0.008965409,0.00057186186],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062256455,0.0000133469,0.0028143474,0.00009136107,0.000026367528,0.00034361464,0.013892817,0.0004907616,0.001153802,0.83624685,0.12913759,0.015726939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006524854,0.000033290817,0.018360352,0.00020032827,0.0000676574,0.00008779824,0.005923065,0.0009327407,0.0016114546,0.015067246,0.9574914,0.000159421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99284935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99699914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15187877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15187877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2829752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9837004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3177363672","doi":"","title":"The Supreme Court in Canada's Constitutional Order","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitution; Law; Constitutionalism; Political science; Majority opinion; Constitutional court; Original jurisdiction; Constitutional law; Sociology; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.010186269359488328,"score_gpt":0.24524747835382033,"score_spread":0.235061208994332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3177363672","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043771498,0.010756279,0.0015757261,0.087012276,0.0007056744,0.0000355641,0.0007389401,0.000071513474,0.85533243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8800568,0.0042772978,0.001062997,0.010464031,0.000240237,0.000026762356,0.00026257103,0.00006420886,0.10354515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942536,0.00083384,0.00009637424,0.00054864254,0.0019906661,0.0022769824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973465,0.00070891326,0.00010620372,0.00013273959,0.0012446118,0.00046100293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025584202,0.00031316708,0.0004870338,0.0016188987,0.024952572,0.01594728,0.0018149534,0.004969886,0.0069813896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007982683,0.00037724373,0.00031340722,0.003828215,0.017745655,0.002975587,0.0020384854,0.0057433695,0.00048248874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006022901,0.000002105954,0.0002876136,0.000012172536,0.0000027955318,0.000103273924,0.0036699313,0.00026998293,0.00005237113,0.9731231,0.019145574,0.0033251517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003613203,0.000013290306,0.007650279,0.00039410163,0.000042344753,0.00008398866,0.0102796,0.0013686115,0.00028344418,0.21825284,0.7614755,0.00011992823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9928209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9951357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16826321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16826321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17358364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96469676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3177830479","doi":"","title":"Stating it Simply: A Comparative Study of the Quantitative Readability of Apex Court Decisions from Canada, Australia, South Africa, the UK, and the USA","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Readability; Jurisdiction; Law; Order (exchange); Political science; Apex (geometry); High Court; Sociology; Business; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09269099111085734,"score_gpt":0.3529101016266257,"score_spread":0.2602191105157684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3177830479","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947484,0.00010106282,0.00014383139,0.00012413996,0.000004657045,0.000010514749,0.00028147583,0.0000037596185,0.004582117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983967,0.000079599864,0.00015412967,0.0000428139,0.0000051703223,0.0000068567724,0.00028556745,0.0000053365015,0.0010239523],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997979,0.00039834421,0.00013914886,0.00024596593,0.0010346561,0.00020282934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97486955,0.013057324,0.0033572458,0.0008016981,0.0070740264,0.00084012427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021313212,0.00013759846,0.00017236978,0.0033422874,0.0011787708,0.001921313,0.0003160281,0.00029121453,0.0019547532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027624412,0.00009858122,0.0001350945,0.003641261,0.0016236727,0.000932759,0.000985588,0.0004987959,0.00020723023],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003226574,0.00012221714,0.6506275,0.00022390616,0.00016800001,0.00088435167,0.24674986,0.00067163684,0.004612218,0.0036169554,0.004185762,0.08781498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003115595,0.000029016554,0.9681046,0.000030926778,0.000009873807,0.00006322374,0.026700463,0.00027231418,0.00051118596,0.00020546277,0.004051447,0.000018321552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36861655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6024053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6313834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003573165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026604661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7329419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3178442771","doi":"","title":"Between Populism and Juristocracy: The Republicanism of Rainer Knopff","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Skepticism; Political science; Law; Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Scholarship; Constitutional theory; Populism; Law and economics; Constitutional law; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.015315163812493609,"score_gpt":0.28366320875852025,"score_spread":0.26834804494602665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3178442771","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09345179,0.018556451,0.00697653,0.44679913,0.0007283611,0.000028940458,0.000050435137,0.000043795746,0.43336466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9375909,0.0033149417,0.0012263816,0.024439963,0.0003076993,0.000025241821,0.000011179955,0.000049549304,0.03303417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99537635,0.0022709223,0.00005112804,0.0005501539,0.0010405764,0.0007107621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99541676,0.0034429904,0.00020497815,0.00024061129,0.00041917997,0.00027545445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052317046,0.00016767655,0.0003327854,0.00093990896,0.012044788,0.006665183,0.00071532483,0.0032702566,0.0027389782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0101439245,0.00029255167,0.00017525628,0.0014223672,0.032359395,0.0049892953,0.0030617497,0.0053194463,0.00030852947],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006535921,0.0000057837938,0.00023251133,0.000008572629,0.0000017032612,0.00004693936,0.0077583683,0.000088022214,0.00004764941,0.9788987,0.008986546,0.0039186333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020751073,0.00001401002,0.0014013587,0.00015631104,0.000006613196,0.00012119558,0.009033942,0.00058638025,0.000346906,0.63159114,0.3566843,0.000037022117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16323006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15945306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16323006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016907461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013443228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32455993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3179491379","doi":"10.1017/s1352325221000094","title":"HYPERLEXIS AND THE RULE OF LAW","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rule of law; Law; Political science; State (computer science); Law and economics; Power (physics); Private law; Public law; Space (punctuation); Plan (archaeology); Sociology; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.017890170038501973,"score_gpt":0.27712352917389504,"score_spread":0.2592333591353931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3179491379","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29919544,0.004637535,0.0095541915,0.04510403,0.0003304606,0.000049204944,0.00012902501,0.000066150125,0.640934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946531,0.00039755582,0.0005141135,0.0007829485,0.000095332354,0.000010593049,0.000018955316,0.00000546461,0.0035219078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99707603,0.0011603388,0.00018553986,0.000456539,0.0008090187,0.0003126466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98374444,0.0105373,0.0026895637,0.00069412135,0.0015869592,0.00074759714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023680811,0.0001389217,0.00027142285,0.0022104396,0.0021304707,0.007191411,0.0006455477,0.0014122946,0.006584318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010628055,0.00011450806,0.00015207594,0.0012619392,0.026121821,0.0038399363,0.0026535704,0.0023854293,0.00043960172],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006515457,0.000029907686,0.0015891673,0.000015985623,0.000002040643,0.00013925748,0.0025261375,0.00012606806,0.00008082479,0.9905357,0.0011377782,0.0038107617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013589016,0.000017760098,0.00242379,0.000063540494,0.0000031862883,0.00021794907,0.0023885658,0.0005111198,0.00011259905,0.97171044,0.02252843,0.000009013188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004727393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003289657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007191411,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033989924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026171147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0246616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3181859479","doi":"","title":"Judicial Review in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duquesne Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.030351447576479083,"score_gpt":0.3277087244845792,"score_spread":0.29735727690810015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3181859479","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06630162,0.05355854,0.00095079636,0.46050647,0.0058195586,0.00043306328,0.0022437274,0.00019385944,0.40999237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40411907,0.019314796,0.0015509741,0.10722104,0.0018634041,0.00028711115,0.0005068497,0.00019481839,0.4649419],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97523654,0.003251194,0.0009000082,0.0023691037,0.0096700825,0.00857304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9542726,0.01223314,0.0012711958,0.0011987204,0.02249748,0.008526786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014010298,0.00075791165,0.0019096951,0.0067084534,0.043045107,0.02276866,0.0043370826,0.017374288,0.02350363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050194014,0.0016320422,0.0010388413,0.0076909987,0.010534597,0.004091544,0.004058306,0.012495059,0.001569026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012413638,0.00013347033,0.007539844,0.0002681749,0.00011957404,0.000738269,0.0035283393,0.0013944756,0.0002615785,0.40712503,0.5418548,0.036912344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013829529,0.000056903966,0.027283704,0.0007131073,0.00013968495,0.00013106616,0.0049318615,0.0016958722,0.0004463733,0.030070892,0.93415517,0.00023693348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.991402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.996797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24193946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24193946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4993977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8792428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3182126444","doi":"","title":"Novel Uses of the Charter Following Doré and Loyola","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Statutory law; Political science; Constitutionalism; Law; Duty; State (computer science); Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology; Democracy; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01577044749942499,"score_gpt":0.2756434168446741,"score_spread":0.2598729693452491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3182126444","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04781551,0.0056238933,0.04557317,0.13113213,0.0017290544,0.00022253263,0.0003174474,0.0001720145,0.76741415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86789876,0.0015674339,0.0122884605,0.01501126,0.00038920375,0.00021782356,0.00007462485,0.000076589226,0.10247577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940853,0.001968513,0.00016769789,0.0009472822,0.0019167953,0.0009143712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99482334,0.002740647,0.00034283107,0.00045008372,0.0014445598,0.00019846877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004535608,0.00035788436,0.00030289282,0.0009746528,0.008208397,0.00787563,0.0011633631,0.0033857566,0.0027019691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012187844,0.00026685925,0.00033949155,0.0011857721,0.026890386,0.0042605223,0.0027827504,0.008524467,0.00038396654],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039779934,0.0000037666948,0.000102589314,0.0000061965106,7.4687074e-7,0.000021290018,0.003763923,0.000039717183,0.000042781416,0.9892489,0.004293719,0.002472261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032546184,0.000032562824,0.0015692058,0.00017371867,0.00001389799,0.00014505122,0.0068763345,0.00070309144,0.0011090023,0.33631364,0.65295225,0.000078650715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19997369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3042064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8000263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02127678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019294944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39761943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3183574380","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1422","title":"Substantive Equality and Jordan’s Principle: Challenges and Complexities","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Operationalization; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Individualism; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.13650249277374452,"score_gpt":0.39096221217906807,"score_spread":0.2544597194053235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3183574380","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04106985,0.009806115,0.10061463,0.48988566,0.0017573307,0.00022374235,0.000069161666,0.00012014926,0.35645345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85126656,0.0038379687,0.04575735,0.067823686,0.001761299,0.00051443966,0.000052739215,0.00015525134,0.028830728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9555843,0.0262331,0.00179936,0.0039138854,0.008925944,0.0035434302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9637911,0.025582796,0.0017212097,0.0032127541,0.0041958103,0.0014964266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0588759,0.0003752772,0.0012172798,0.0013540334,0.015320073,0.015825512,0.0038801837,0.011236601,0.003229347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041201454,0.0006915086,0.0011302033,0.0018255477,0.10503161,0.0144824665,0.011465878,0.023998193,0.0004988161],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017803494,0.000003939134,0.000059332844,0.00001151272,0.0000013348043,0.000023594333,0.0018270924,0.00008312932,0.0000129594155,0.9953246,0.000825519,0.0018251905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001051569,0.000011059619,0.00020247197,0.00015545428,0.0000044378908,0.00008012226,0.0032296404,0.00042211177,0.00012542777,0.9338148,0.06191967,0.000024208686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03672797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02887902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96327204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019125782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048122406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31136924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3183595221","doi":"10.47096/rdpc.v1i2.98","title":"A artificialidade da dicotomia entre teoria externa e teoria interna: a teoria externa é autossuficiente à solução de conflitos entre direitos fundamentais?","year":2021,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Direito Público Contemporâneo","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.04229182219110581,"score_gpt":0.3258737187484526,"score_spread":0.2835818965573468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3183595221","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37231418,0.0041923374,0.09744152,0.02084203,0.00072162255,0.00019393278,0.00026330576,0.00020464894,0.50382644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9529293,0.0011520798,0.015315668,0.0008205668,0.000087313194,0.000119135795,0.0000812245,0.00006248782,0.029432192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99433845,0.0020578837,0.00033578704,0.0009971729,0.0016624779,0.0006082318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98694545,0.004491528,0.0026183652,0.0021510774,0.0027517185,0.001041855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051519605,0.00041778505,0.00037038996,0.0015503665,0.004273598,0.007968781,0.001284527,0.0021945825,0.012444613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011272789,0.0004701526,0.0005570313,0.0014295413,0.019174015,0.004914865,0.004408085,0.002573185,0.001393769],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000106305924,0.000084177074,0.017530236,0.00041346293,0.000026352518,0.0003443284,0.021294126,0.0012888,0.006144177,0.9007986,0.0026524249,0.049316984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006079778,0.0003995078,0.06263416,0.0016218548,0.00012317301,0.0016718316,0.07499586,0.0047744806,0.01320635,0.3972384,0.44310838,0.00016513884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008017836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015052615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012444613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009264884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0416314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185928768","doi":"","title":"Vavilov's Rule of Law: A Diceyan Model and Its Implications","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Presumption; Supreme court; Political science; Precedent; Judicial review; Rule of law; Consistency (knowledge bases); Common law; Computer science","score_opus":0.03359421177747729,"score_gpt":0.29832075333925867,"score_spread":0.2647265415617814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185928768","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012803718,0.011012304,0.11861141,0.10461673,0.002600349,0.00020442283,0.0005055544,0.00012388185,0.74952155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72388947,0.008852698,0.07584024,0.040376753,0.0062156166,0.00072580174,0.000283227,0.00028292465,0.14353333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99210757,0.0021265158,0.00037115876,0.0018708404,0.002407106,0.0011167874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930628,0.004141306,0.00042666757,0.00071074313,0.001304656,0.00035376218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009666569,0.0008295595,0.001543972,0.0035308914,0.00831603,0.010211035,0.0039666123,0.012998529,0.007818796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015541108,0.0008095237,0.00199646,0.0023970716,0.030463299,0.014394203,0.0044188835,0.013464032,0.0022462436],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013786588,0.0000019247334,0.000012056747,0.0000031005657,6.5403873e-7,0.000014992506,0.000046350524,0.000074852804,0.0000048338857,0.9987055,0.00078350527,0.0003508684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000794252,0.0000042221855,0.000028130955,0.00001940252,0.0000017734162,0.000022534765,0.000022921442,0.0004708742,0.000019406962,0.987815,0.011580941,0.0000068640165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036849514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022146696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036849514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013590593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00986596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09860706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186060564","doi":"10.26153/tsw/13841","title":"Judicial federalism : a comparative study of its origin, operation, and significance","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.08178576743050622,"score_gpt":0.3781206144540064,"score_spread":0.2963348470235002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186060564","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7089945,0.011312832,0.003912453,0.0034162465,0.00012133773,0.000039890634,0.00014935932,0.000026765832,0.27202663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977569,0.0009827069,0.00023601647,0.000057664776,0.00002912912,0.0000060687235,0.00003723732,0.000006781678,0.00088757253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945484,0.0028674745,0.00023873993,0.00048592384,0.0009412131,0.0009182164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98979634,0.0053907847,0.0018713041,0.0007496493,0.0016666882,0.0005253492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064113527,0.00008072702,0.00037027593,0.005788929,0.0045704916,0.0038345687,0.000620396,0.0006082525,0.0023544333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013294839,0.0001658233,0.0003281335,0.008220335,0.006180726,0.0042036865,0.0019590931,0.0012320428,0.00011699295],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000101412385,0.000051790455,0.030240607,0.00017525081,0.00004453997,0.00023097814,0.028090999,0.00039253812,0.000435846,0.8872637,0.0022672857,0.050704993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007553423,0.00034529378,0.56687844,0.0011381392,0.00016776375,0.0012551339,0.08418708,0.0026294685,0.002108949,0.10983522,0.23128389,0.00009507559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0109361885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015164175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0109361885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073253163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031331882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053149164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3190134562","doi":"10.52907/slr.v3i1.105","title":"Contested Empowerment of Kenya’s Judiciary, 2010-2015: A Historical Institutional Analysis by James Thuo Gathii","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strathmore Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Women's and Gender Studies et Recherches Féministes","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Constitution; Principle of legality; Scholarship; Empowerment; Political science; Normative; Law; Sociology; Constitutional theory; Law and economics","score_opus":0.03346336629318181,"score_gpt":0.32944423271554846,"score_spread":0.29598086642236665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3190134562","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6984556,0.058351785,0.0010671504,0.03465012,0.00022488137,0.00010106642,0.000394219,0.000017269693,0.20673797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822035,0.008468527,0.00018880931,0.0007448254,0.000052397365,0.000019904985,0.00005287787,0.000008909008,0.00826019],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992126,0.00027855847,0.000041168172,0.0001313906,0.00011848945,0.00021761956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840957,0.0009440457,0.000329556,0.000049350336,0.0001436187,0.0001238511],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002240851,0.00020692025,0.00024824028,0.0018332475,0.0063499957,0.005081112,0.0007146359,0.0018459406,0.0029249485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035424565,0.00039774965,0.000105417406,0.0032761202,0.0066451025,0.0042293356,0.0021900202,0.0019941574,0.00021557642],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009790185,0.00008851261,0.01245157,0.00053301343,0.000031386593,0.003028588,0.21845809,0.0005144393,0.0014167868,0.717338,0.01811858,0.027923113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025605634,0.000103710525,0.108561166,0.0027177862,0.000057931735,0.00096352096,0.14247793,0.0006257699,0.0018545537,0.024542442,0.71793616,0.00013348088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06257388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16843995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06257388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0115826195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006683155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12441933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3192522861","doi":"","title":"Dare to Diverge: Time for Administrative Law in Hong Kong to Stand on its Own Two Feet","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Tribunal; Economic Justice; Certainty; Political science; English law; Administrative law; Legal certainty","score_opus":0.029903719837592317,"score_gpt":0.3414944403667125,"score_spread":0.3115907205291202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3192522861","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87831587,0.003089088,0.0006743117,0.068115994,0.0008729683,0.00004524007,0.000056106266,0.000028282931,0.048802022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9743755,0.000738086,0.00033954237,0.0066569895,0.00006030632,0.000022071246,0.00002517214,0.000014635833,0.017767647],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99664694,0.0009388528,0.00020552822,0.000277675,0.0004004842,0.001530426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944582,0.001127284,0.00076624827,0.0003369371,0.0010257438,0.0022854393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052820677,0.00015496685,0.00022561308,0.00043877296,0.011338412,0.012007695,0.0010784818,0.0017624125,0.0030050115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005248995,0.000519574,0.00029824808,0.0007078565,0.010267899,0.00427933,0.0049117343,0.004418672,0.0004624087],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022883745,0.00027014344,0.1112651,0.00023735123,0.00006046895,0.008532227,0.489348,0.0008281469,0.002699709,0.26692504,0.06850825,0.051096726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040066705,0.00017630747,0.10661293,0.00037664775,0.000047074347,0.000430814,0.49883714,0.00066635536,0.0009861647,0.0068886997,0.38474938,0.00018850148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4596182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5555104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4596182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025265407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0414238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9138859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3193428852","doi":"10.1017/9781108966399.009","title":"The Minority Rights Implications of Irish Unification","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Irish; Unification; Minority rights; Political science; Law; Constitution; Population; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.038322237424768944,"score_gpt":0.24590274245083052,"score_spread":0.20758050502606157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3193428852","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03904043,0.0021968116,0.0008807252,0.025554491,0.0004362447,0.000015500962,0.00002392028,0.00001291949,0.9318389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8787958,0.0019105101,0.00071977027,0.009901959,0.0005025485,0.000063922336,0.00004132556,0.000038865037,0.10802524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99332595,0.0020130046,0.00016707735,0.0007738006,0.0015443149,0.0021758277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967179,0.0015930792,0.00029299746,0.00033098593,0.0005658105,0.00049927796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074367514,0.00024680494,0.00036353772,0.0010499937,0.0099398475,0.009668093,0.0016704075,0.001985854,0.008117231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008092769,0.00023606897,0.00044510912,0.0013904611,0.022344315,0.0059953947,0.009680574,0.0064632604,0.0008632693],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011327152,0.000011647193,0.0005919769,0.000016328639,0.0000021655017,0.00006682297,0.007886946,0.000053881915,0.0000812914,0.98071975,0.0034945963,0.007063104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044422708,0.00008320747,0.009582498,0.00051356124,0.0000252654,0.00018852006,0.046895668,0.00042777142,0.0009785204,0.40740857,0.53380364,0.000048303147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059380088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08429226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059380088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0130961025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011138104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11806893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194065245","doi":"","title":"Le droit de vote, la représentation effective et l’égalité des électeurs : de l’importance de prendre au sérieux un droit constitutionnel (The Right to Vote, Effective Representation, and Voters' Equality: On the Importance of Taking a Constitutional Right Seriously)","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Jurisprudence; Constitution; Res judicata; Deference; Humanities; Citizenship; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.009985500864290611,"score_gpt":0.28859091629392136,"score_spread":0.27860541542963074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194065245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27600265,0.0039225235,0.005967435,0.072374046,0.0004966357,0.000048946302,0.0004154504,0.000024971972,0.6407474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96162546,0.0005328129,0.00033511216,0.0012887765,0.00007456669,0.000019008965,0.00003103328,0.000012091525,0.03608116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99536115,0.002231345,0.000111933645,0.0003349508,0.00084243604,0.0011182018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99670416,0.0017408639,0.00027701008,0.0002603771,0.00073346455,0.00028414093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004721877,0.00017206746,0.00019927185,0.0008054578,0.004149092,0.006563186,0.0006106246,0.0012346092,0.010128958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008442904,0.00016726744,0.00015893372,0.0012174167,0.009906679,0.0016589329,0.0023602005,0.002581717,0.0008139303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007735025,0.000013231453,0.0048550926,0.000038062943,0.0000078259745,0.00007710529,0.011265171,0.00037680575,0.00026476916,0.959355,0.0070885746,0.016581027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010646139,0.00012210061,0.08148695,0.0005073511,0.000069975395,0.00017486869,0.050662927,0.001700588,0.0028705308,0.29572782,0.56646097,0.0001094698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3362987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5112657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3362987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017212551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013843344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66868246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195243318","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2021.1953742","title":"Anatomy of an election – Canada’s Federal General Election of 2019 through the lens of political law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federal election; Law; Politics; Political science; Election law; Democracy","score_opus":0.02199072710997826,"score_gpt":0.31044438128734436,"score_spread":0.2884536541773661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195243318","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007081145,0.0034198416,0.0019027578,0.032344066,0.0008494274,0.000037981736,0.00043316477,0.00007379816,0.9538579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.548822,0.0042569484,0.0026250572,0.009747617,0.0005360719,0.000057924426,0.00034578773,0.00020518353,0.43340337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984303,0.00030298045,0.000017086077,0.0001301873,0.00050181843,0.000617594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991666,0.00016023745,0.000030615764,0.0000334282,0.00035950614,0.00024960242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008687799,0.00027387933,0.00018036012,0.0017110638,0.018051175,0.009852089,0.0007508858,0.0020952974,0.016765261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024171544,0.0002546568,0.00020482403,0.0021321927,0.016338158,0.0021608593,0.0014152282,0.004209599,0.0017099907],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071304726,0.0000040709347,0.00032238686,0.000010607324,0.0000019073118,0.00008263007,0.0054003387,0.000093996445,0.00007118844,0.92009425,0.06704402,0.006867568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004335455,0.000005334323,0.0030667668,0.000064504915,0.0000035428343,0.000054593365,0.0049844948,0.00014827524,0.00009247714,0.051606204,0.9399529,0.000016576349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9511967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97437245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07211407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07211407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07093631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5232267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195938815","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192893765.003.0007","title":"The Abusive Borrowing of Political Constitutionalism and Weak-Form Judicial Review","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Politics; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Criminology; Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.03425727321717925,"score_gpt":0.3063473867145365,"score_spread":0.27209011349735723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195938815","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04832989,0.0043097143,0.03925338,0.03387035,0.0004420815,0.00007677824,0.0000804685,0.000105727355,0.87353164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95457125,0.001464484,0.004202677,0.003952258,0.00041653233,0.00009109988,0.00003223984,0.000062239946,0.035207216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9839431,0.008680906,0.0005104796,0.0014619959,0.004598893,0.00080463354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97633946,0.015608734,0.0013738299,0.0036789689,0.002553914,0.0004451162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010924466,0.00017790758,0.0004792803,0.0015652024,0.0033264188,0.007065582,0.0012762636,0.0018259472,0.004071754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029257035,0.00035277475,0.00025923116,0.00136159,0.02339361,0.006174871,0.0041417056,0.005648244,0.0006834356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017383707,0.0000022497902,0.000062629886,0.000007759797,0.0000011673974,0.000010294423,0.00047485725,0.000060509745,0.00003721802,0.9956109,0.00089539704,0.0028352884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010052156,0.000013886786,0.00076978427,0.00007690798,0.0000071859595,0.00007474543,0.00048332624,0.0008787528,0.00039026432,0.92631453,0.07096786,0.000012611776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043122633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067142416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010924466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053069997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00531616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05777484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196550758","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3732904","title":"Dialogue and Distrust: John Hart Ely and the Canadian Charter","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Distrust; Charter; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.013748823575536737,"score_gpt":0.23212648603651795,"score_spread":0.21837766246098123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196550758","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043950126,0.0186839,0.0006781984,0.6380184,0.0013452964,0.000053228665,0.00019072028,0.00003168623,0.2970484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81058824,0.0071707475,0.0005573851,0.083162054,0.0011134569,0.000075606076,0.000057806777,0.00013054654,0.09714422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9827322,0.0051231063,0.00026985275,0.0014141931,0.0042330353,0.006227674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.966835,0.018586224,0.0011878347,0.0009727706,0.0075210556,0.0048970995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016760122,0.0005940899,0.0013250571,0.003554265,0.07627439,0.02749211,0.004078235,0.020871017,0.01336684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047125857,0.00083915365,0.0004950506,0.0062449477,0.08316175,0.011176145,0.007686629,0.021999719,0.00078513526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005709573,0.000043261727,0.0014788746,0.00004021806,0.00001392332,0.00021858768,0.060622465,0.00028655052,0.000050869727,0.7985163,0.12769541,0.010976567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092664086,0.000025722487,0.008002959,0.00063927,0.00004599751,0.0001223341,0.16559035,0.00047409476,0.00018305944,0.24755187,0.57696456,0.0003069873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98464406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9901597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13858949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13858949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21888694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196893986","doi":"10.3390/laws10030072","title":"An American Notwithstanding Clause? Between Potestas and Potentia","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Context (archaeology); Constitution; Presidential system; Establishment Clause; Sovereignty; Power (physics); Law and economics; Politics; Sociology; History; First amendment","score_opus":0.031020929596060034,"score_gpt":0.33103534425600234,"score_spread":0.30001441465994233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196893986","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05663808,0.003768314,0.005459185,0.03379996,0.0006880353,0.00002293886,0.00008555101,0.000053912314,0.89948404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9546106,0.0010790719,0.0011848384,0.009647873,0.00043863818,0.000040921168,0.00004002091,0.00004763173,0.032910418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840564,0.0004318452,0.000046901456,0.00044040012,0.00032936147,0.0003459301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839705,0.0009363747,0.0001345816,0.00016589298,0.00020782695,0.00015820247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018691354,0.00019135558,0.00032617417,0.0006651271,0.0053139795,0.010323747,0.00054835953,0.0033346259,0.009132452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004800394,0.00026214233,0.00030758936,0.0008766017,0.013713481,0.007495802,0.0026955635,0.007063551,0.0010113005],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005195333,0.000002437306,0.000090362504,0.0000026590312,6.7835987e-7,0.000017745491,0.0007468919,0.0000063975763,0.00003481812,0.9969098,0.0011539637,0.0010290161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044123135,0.000029031247,0.0030425026,0.00014159965,0.000033621254,0.00022322283,0.0042133583,0.0003043904,0.0007348135,0.5982171,0.39297396,0.000042301006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011880272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0141401375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9881197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032311252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002458006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030551076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197590264","doi":"10.1093/he/9780191926440.003.0062","title":"Re Resolution to Amend the Constitution of Canada [1981] 1 SCR 753, also known as the Patriation Reference, Supreme Court of Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03367796961031942,"score_gpt":0.22463165853119985,"score_spread":0.19095368892088044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197590264","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002687706,0.011300825,0.00081148563,0.041445933,0.0036282593,0.0002461308,0.0016878542,0.000092051334,0.93809986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.060358357,0.007913932,0.002191852,0.053171203,0.00095486594,0.00024047065,0.0009278527,0.00015822497,0.8740832],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99222785,0.0006166234,0.00024438673,0.0005683489,0.004424025,0.0019188162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99762076,0.00048432045,0.000114018585,0.00014071334,0.0014475129,0.00019260804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031280124,0.0010119587,0.0006146011,0.0027724153,0.016237346,0.006975822,0.003060721,0.013621042,0.014300749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008316868,0.0008461617,0.0008223245,0.004293729,0.008102183,0.0019271967,0.001967754,0.0091134515,0.0032240301],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000945966,0.000014803826,0.00020947852,0.000047500896,0.000006062929,0.00019790855,0.0016044688,0.00023952212,0.00017692373,0.36626202,0.6246569,0.0065748873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017554989,0.000006296207,0.0013656605,0.0002315128,0.00001191749,0.000056980825,0.0008526299,0.00011995215,0.0002022052,0.010249949,0.98684084,0.000044461267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97315705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98822314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91282296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.087177016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13243887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6325165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197616992","doi":"10.1111/capa.12431","title":"Protecting privacy? Government and parliamentary responsiveness to the privacy commissioner of Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; House of Commons; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Political science; Commons; Law; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.030304108855482507,"score_gpt":0.27031459117077034,"score_spread":0.24001048231528782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197616992","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7735394,0.0018093918,0.00084487436,0.07558077,0.00021073471,0.00014077038,0.00032312918,0.000056064695,0.14749493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99368864,0.00034685814,0.00013926734,0.0019708073,0.000014597841,0.000011758681,0.000024434989,0.00000858216,0.0037951064],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97270036,0.0063805385,0.0007270515,0.0016333825,0.010687449,0.007871235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.932001,0.027933614,0.008169041,0.0018352177,0.02141958,0.008641534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01501824,0.00017322144,0.00043835992,0.0025592064,0.026305214,0.011355782,0.0018743611,0.0024041613,0.0048006475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06321951,0.00043348604,0.0002907795,0.0050826045,0.014733611,0.0018998149,0.0037959646,0.0042624585,0.00025037982],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002027863,0.000121424055,0.16133527,0.00040426428,0.00013289573,0.0020330623,0.52666533,0.0016522129,0.0027858478,0.21427023,0.039598208,0.05079843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042177748,0.00007343874,0.33476898,0.0005381706,0.00010412794,0.00017595595,0.3352202,0.0011095367,0.0012833136,0.007813597,0.31859136,0.00027908315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9909513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9915959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8069827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19301729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24249046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93598557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197624574","doi":"","title":"The Good, the Bad and the Ugly:","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Statutory law; Appeal; Confusion; Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; Refugee; Immigration; Standard of review; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Psychology","score_opus":0.041277510750622096,"score_gpt":0.27882771498471887,"score_spread":0.23755020423409678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197624574","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035337258,0.035001196,0.0065886206,0.8034641,0.0034075568,0.000084861975,0.00010640544,0.000085918575,0.11592408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78659576,0.0064863977,0.0042886254,0.17307374,0.0014036056,0.000049218263,0.000043558997,0.00006830099,0.027990798],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9480956,0.018556273,0.0014908162,0.003324309,0.019880535,0.008652346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.965647,0.018415682,0.0017465897,0.0015625982,0.009093999,0.0035341268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029525777,0.00027388928,0.0005559347,0.0023508766,0.024083694,0.025115412,0.0025710342,0.010373638,0.0013372736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07458233,0.00042109916,0.00059421203,0.002411129,0.042114623,0.006285439,0.005307974,0.01242664,0.00023622204],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000136092185,0.0000071674795,0.0013970612,0.00006899294,0.0000148812915,0.00023493207,0.0067207757,0.00020786987,0.00018759233,0.93771994,0.03966922,0.013757934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041091836,0.00005280001,0.01002787,0.0011014016,0.0000798186,0.00042940784,0.01900519,0.0012202606,0.00088214956,0.27961284,0.687284,0.0002630699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82474214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91368145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82474214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08317429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13850208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6034745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199035267","doi":"","title":"Purposive Interpretation: Loyola and the Forgotten Orphan of Canadian Constitutionalism","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutionalism; CLARITY; Constitution; Law; Political science; Consistency (knowledge bases); Philosophy; Democracy; Computer science; Politics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.00829903629806695,"score_gpt":0.241052521410157,"score_spread":0.23275348511209007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199035267","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024436682,0.010206326,0.010520192,0.6168922,0.0022807233,0.00008461624,0.000204149,0.00013844299,0.33523655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8176984,0.0041610585,0.0037342696,0.12680638,0.0013478814,0.000105982224,0.00007648844,0.00014472356,0.04592475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.980888,0.004603517,0.0004349514,0.0020081885,0.007310524,0.0047548064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97866553,0.0098718805,0.00093058584,0.0013750552,0.007893367,0.0012636645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01636184,0.00049008057,0.0007551357,0.0021473567,0.034493513,0.014926977,0.0033584773,0.0075537446,0.0045185266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042030536,0.0004859007,0.0006961401,0.0029081907,0.0594245,0.0051402743,0.0044471617,0.014915945,0.00042692802],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012428507,0.0000035553023,0.00045613304,0.000029630137,0.000005983805,0.00010511188,0.0064790854,0.000087595916,0.000041946452,0.9646623,0.024464536,0.0036517067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005845127,0.000016051383,0.0037345043,0.0005825342,0.000056234665,0.00020216322,0.01392897,0.0008854776,0.00044031866,0.40013915,0.5797916,0.00016456268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95247656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96195406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09398945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09398945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12676333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6819444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W319908803","doi":"","title":"A Bill of Rights Odyssey for Australia: The Sirens are Calling","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bill of rights; Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Common law; Law and economics; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.050234584415605556,"score_gpt":0.3289777619148671,"score_spread":0.27874317749926153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W319908803","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09953973,0.0061033317,0.0026837008,0.18513606,0.0012156784,0.000041487197,0.000051335,0.00003699592,0.7051917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77858067,0.0030891064,0.002090266,0.04255633,0.00032945565,0.00006134856,0.000036785357,0.000060807262,0.17319517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99589133,0.0014493302,0.000096987926,0.00025261982,0.0013228407,0.0009868646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99789137,0.00073893263,0.00015758823,0.00020245886,0.0005371345,0.0004725661],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035980958,0.00018403675,0.0003366051,0.00083863805,0.009430244,0.007304769,0.0006763106,0.004115447,0.007004698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008777001,0.00030112235,0.00026750474,0.0007174857,0.010572977,0.006217296,0.004099314,0.008157217,0.0007138692],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014236706,0.000015132827,0.00061506854,0.000035304132,0.000003182582,0.0001525039,0.013635343,0.000079242265,0.00021938643,0.9519454,0.019743377,0.013541876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012737721,0.000048321053,0.0063521103,0.00029410736,0.000015678352,0.00020375612,0.016720602,0.00037765843,0.00024205733,0.11563787,0.8600584,0.000036635778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11576392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21780998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11576392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074545587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015673745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23018014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199705558","doi":"","title":"Judgments v Reasons in Federal Court Refugee Claim Judicial Reviews: A Bad Precedent?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Law; Publishing; Court of record; Political science; High Court; Supreme court; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.022302405661758132,"score_gpt":0.31526177564236213,"score_spread":0.292959369980604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199705558","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8553043,0.01321252,0.004263244,0.040037774,0.00056457584,0.0006150742,0.0008674668,0.00011295141,0.0850221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99193734,0.0012370013,0.001310882,0.0022963074,0.00019864934,0.00013864654,0.00011673973,0.00003115639,0.0027333635],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8429088,0.06385398,0.014019141,0.010938676,0.060149062,0.008130383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.39368087,0.4129255,0.112819165,0.01913099,0.05531192,0.0061316686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.075623736,0.00025557503,0.00066338014,0.010066452,0.012362027,0.01799738,0.0015609651,0.0033080068,0.003760162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.45465285,0.00093890517,0.0005818717,0.010795134,0.012242104,0.008797319,0.0048472267,0.0037842996,0.0005056785],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057868095,0.000354021,0.30996624,0.002220639,0.00031222694,0.0026125445,0.30553776,0.001177343,0.00206469,0.1606341,0.034230746,0.18031104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014788768,0.0003149505,0.5550266,0.0056473333,0.00034952443,0.00083368266,0.17106019,0.0013345901,0.0034934883,0.026836589,0.2345755,0.00037971468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19373648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3052825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19373648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034180656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047664933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39994133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200126117","doi":"10.21991/cf29429","title":"Checking the Other and Checking the Self: Role Morality and the Separation of Powers","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Impartiality; Separation of powers; Rule of law; Power (physics); Law; Democracy; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Legislature; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.019758544782407333,"score_gpt":0.2911096224306319,"score_spread":0.2713510776482245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200126117","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.097694136,0.00989799,0.036541194,0.20303889,0.0015084179,0.000056220695,0.000045348508,0.000066076966,0.6511518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97714305,0.0011641966,0.0032145958,0.006085272,0.0004034166,0.000043422646,0.000013405374,0.000041184136,0.011891465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98848104,0.0084182285,0.00016999143,0.0007524801,0.0011726052,0.001005624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99273586,0.004478517,0.0006799935,0.0007906164,0.000546657,0.00076836185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010779721,0.0003759477,0.0004259455,0.0012607769,0.0074501783,0.01110848,0.0013099306,0.0041575623,0.0038050655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010433988,0.0002886516,0.0004897584,0.0008925935,0.071521156,0.014668072,0.0054225745,0.007607097,0.00051793654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006442444,0.0000068075433,0.00007059225,0.000006416758,0.0000010077504,0.000018915127,0.0022237648,0.00004401398,0.000022934371,0.9952742,0.0010311755,0.0012938391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001342255,0.0000083642935,0.00016995605,0.00004759547,0.0000021370738,0.000029322493,0.0018098674,0.00023305084,0.000082534345,0.97877574,0.018819919,0.000008099965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038331077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028803428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01110848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004978881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00475372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05700928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201007371","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3478650","title":"L'ingéniere para-constitutionnelle : modifier la Constitution par la bande et par contrat (Para-Constitutional Engineering: Amending the Canadian Constitution Indirectly and by Contract)","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011517978163141908,"score_gpt":0.24348551883578481,"score_spread":0.2319675406726429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201007371","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0235561,0.0061230115,0.0074385297,0.07944939,0.0012072808,0.00014153423,0.0006447298,0.00013138352,0.88130814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65737593,0.0046537127,0.011612567,0.01864168,0.00077195157,0.00020051782,0.00024446423,0.00018342365,0.3063157],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929128,0.0011051202,0.0001369719,0.00071544066,0.002621412,0.0025082591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99750453,0.0009296357,0.0001319504,0.0002880715,0.0008873345,0.0002584848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047440715,0.0006379602,0.0005164418,0.0014327044,0.012281723,0.010697416,0.0023271944,0.0071623106,0.014100429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009724811,0.0006066582,0.000528067,0.002974652,0.017992198,0.0041881623,0.0027280438,0.0085578775,0.00098662],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053099193,0.0000059056433,0.00017245214,0.000010119522,0.0000018485134,0.000016178446,0.0011990443,0.00012737198,0.00008774056,0.981891,0.0131160645,0.0033670405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053215528,0.00002366012,0.009161073,0.00016007415,0.00003945221,0.00009541796,0.0031648907,0.0014016955,0.0007780375,0.25363818,0.7313802,0.000104056395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9710841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98225373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9392561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.060743906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12960571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44072992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201552816","doi":"","title":"Standing in the Way: Comparing Constraints on Access to Justice after the Liberalization of Public Interest Standing in Canada and Israel","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Doctrine; Political science","score_opus":0.08791646586939315,"score_gpt":0.3370943018105437,"score_spread":0.2491778359411505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201552816","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9093131,0.0010137054,0.00036297046,0.005125711,0.00003095499,0.00009525519,0.0003466363,0.000011409466,0.08370026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948782,0.00029986724,0.00012865914,0.00052962935,0.000010707569,0.000028776672,0.00014605321,0.000009793431,0.0039684586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9822709,0.0012145253,0.00027072395,0.0005535032,0.005246727,0.0104436455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98315006,0.00454899,0.0014866777,0.00058014726,0.00648522,0.0037489643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052842107,0.0003064449,0.0010137869,0.0029668629,0.015035798,0.013372992,0.0032983753,0.0027328075,0.005338342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02542258,0.00046028767,0.00080219365,0.004897454,0.013263106,0.003314383,0.006173961,0.005454971,0.00020068667],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016470272,0.0006095588,0.19637582,0.00025241196,0.00045629794,0.0020821528,0.0838572,0.009097896,0.0027162763,0.62093645,0.01328084,0.06868808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041565197,0.00037510187,0.66872495,0.0006466664,0.0004628975,0.00025771768,0.20319471,0.0069403085,0.0021767444,0.04064889,0.075549625,0.0006067573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.990546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.995665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18650597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18650597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14835846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9435378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201581927","doi":"10.21991/cf29427","title":"Are There “Sources of Resilience” When the Separation of Powers Breaks Down?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Separation of powers; Legislature; Presidential system; Politics; Political science; Independence (probability theory); Power (physics); Law and economics; Executive branch; Law; Sociology; Mathematics; Statistics; Physics","score_opus":0.02237820668620567,"score_gpt":0.28957387556443787,"score_spread":0.2671956688782322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201581927","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15970437,0.0075480365,0.05940353,0.33544818,0.0015328166,0.000112332826,0.00043053136,0.00053440535,0.43528578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825507,0.0011761804,0.0034495487,0.0055853436,0.00046277817,0.0000932429,0.00008225723,0.00014712516,0.006452883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99542785,0.0016844115,0.00011620693,0.00076314306,0.0007778069,0.0012305996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991668,0.0032947045,0.0015681802,0.0017795035,0.0008126981,0.00087692955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00631015,0.0006665562,0.0008127367,0.003126575,0.0055138348,0.012274789,0.0024132896,0.0039595743,0.012316212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021291506,0.0005164524,0.00068610604,0.002920152,0.049892794,0.030086482,0.010171727,0.006008156,0.0012871718],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002586141,0.000011047331,0.0011950391,0.0000311966,0.000017170381,0.00014529651,0.008740997,0.00028274627,0.00013526021,0.9779283,0.0044268137,0.00706029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009923771,0.000012061223,0.0014243128,0.000065519824,0.0000065750132,0.000082042134,0.008858375,0.00035416114,0.000087181696,0.96634066,0.022737728,0.000021390868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002296301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024959987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012316212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005632273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024615077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04120177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202974874","doi":"","title":"Notwithstanding Rights, Review, or Remedy? On the Notwithstanding Clause and the Operation of Legislation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Law; Constitution; Charter; Legislature; Fundamental rights; Judicial review; Law and economics; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.04633938444340602,"score_gpt":0.2737749389268172,"score_spread":0.22743555448341118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202974874","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02697402,0.023032235,0.013647442,0.31835818,0.0023589346,0.00012161221,0.00008297283,0.000106314306,0.6153183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80146706,0.00942211,0.0046403315,0.09085531,0.004668985,0.00029183412,0.00008403908,0.00013074589,0.0884396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9844617,0.007763699,0.0005215425,0.0019248498,0.0033528318,0.001975327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869467,0.008733024,0.0011036113,0.0015180084,0.0013454107,0.00035324623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01727473,0.00028945296,0.00064081885,0.0013717219,0.0056565767,0.016155783,0.0019262708,0.010922029,0.00496228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029004907,0.00032679856,0.00061871577,0.0013305024,0.052428335,0.014831335,0.0033144068,0.008425636,0.0008938731],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022327442,0.00000299336,0.000036159043,0.0000058737637,7.4361554e-7,0.000012124648,0.0006301977,0.00001685313,0.00003093457,0.99584913,0.0021179689,0.0012948124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033258417,0.00004330019,0.00084358454,0.0004533191,0.000020094869,0.000076473894,0.0030606424,0.00028594158,0.0004153993,0.76972336,0.22500446,0.000040269715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013071837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010704282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01727473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006532435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0117705185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09135854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203351226","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0088","title":"The judicial review of legality","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Principle of legality; Law; Political science; Judicial activism; Judicial independence; Judicial restraint; Jurisprudence; Legislation; Administrative law; Legitimacy; Ultra vires; Legislature; Judicial discretion; Supreme court; Politics","score_opus":0.01895730970178488,"score_gpt":0.26709398360848474,"score_spread":0.24813667390669986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203351226","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045767337,0.05273668,0.057881836,0.14610498,0.0035357098,0.00018595633,0.00011071845,0.00011152715,0.69356525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94814086,0.011298226,0.0067274487,0.010700455,0.0022476201,0.00009953425,0.00003482258,0.000041483818,0.020709494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9606578,0.025518522,0.0012598886,0.0029887604,0.00779098,0.001783976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96180344,0.025783032,0.0026569641,0.0035515134,0.005520639,0.00068438804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02705354,0.00023728979,0.0005586143,0.0026622151,0.00610493,0.0098317545,0.0013276068,0.004437528,0.0021080743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057922073,0.00032826583,0.00033360653,0.0019208064,0.035974037,0.008662151,0.0038057975,0.0037688727,0.00037716678],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002409087,0.000002905293,0.00014261996,0.000029571149,0.0000034159148,0.00002925131,0.0025373078,0.00008146274,0.000050802202,0.98483974,0.002882757,0.009397718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023598748,0.000051043782,0.001191639,0.00051983097,0.000021030315,0.0002411608,0.0037682294,0.00045095396,0.00044770943,0.6481354,0.3451048,0.000044591292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009039399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010727382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02705354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009808859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015700467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14307445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204240245","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0063","title":"Clash of powers: Did Operation Car Wash trigger a constitutional crisis in Brazil?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impeachment; Mandate; Politics; Political science; Constitutional amendment; Democracy; Language change; Presidential system; Law; Separation of powers; Political economy; Constitutional crisis; Constitutional court; Sociology; Constitution","score_opus":0.014173507237649693,"score_gpt":0.2587681920036555,"score_spread":0.24459468476600577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204240245","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91136956,0.0009582825,0.00070109713,0.025567496,0.000047601636,0.000050974508,0.000080491445,0.000017935763,0.061206646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979532,0.00018427883,0.00006770297,0.00043254552,0.000008603051,0.000006181719,0.0000111739255,0.0000053569747,0.0013310399],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987692,0.0003314047,0.00004287262,0.00015021737,0.0002615693,0.00044469882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99740237,0.0009395815,0.00060439593,0.00019689983,0.00035598574,0.000500769],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025999697,0.00012817638,0.0002511116,0.00074043113,0.0052968124,0.0039921436,0.0006632515,0.0014243706,0.003183453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00849601,0.00028314083,0.00015609305,0.0007706882,0.010021311,0.0025128496,0.0027527316,0.0026876621,0.00014618463],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011263511,0.00009763302,0.070115045,0.0002601531,0.000028357064,0.003829528,0.27979505,0.00078266364,0.0048492597,0.59213936,0.009031853,0.038958456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045169218,0.00020498417,0.19337508,0.0006921196,0.000053016618,0.0013852884,0.43570176,0.0020827777,0.002809423,0.062401444,0.3011311,0.00011787832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17056112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26804778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17056112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009976824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010151947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33913672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204551005","doi":"10.3968/12237","title":"Conceptual and Theoretical Exposition on Democracy and Human Rights","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Human rights; Dignity; Law; Liberal democracy; Politics; Political science; Sociology; Authoritarianism; Political philosophy; Law and economics; Morality; Representative democracy","score_opus":0.017546765297416247,"score_gpt":0.28691303669284185,"score_spread":0.2693662713954256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204551005","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009071601,0.021206368,0.034836706,0.054083366,0.0007746604,0.00016856527,0.00022009687,0.000053757212,0.87958485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80533403,0.039591365,0.03765926,0.016925393,0.0017774126,0.0011270674,0.0004337063,0.000078535006,0.097073235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973621,0.0014059371,0.00010189019,0.00024299111,0.00051596423,0.000371112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984255,0.0010280352,0.0001661975,0.00009509095,0.00015634354,0.00012881754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023994735,0.0006104099,0.0004892027,0.0029108329,0.005343198,0.0052409763,0.0016514914,0.0030107398,0.009442794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021670691,0.00025510055,0.00050559343,0.0049390066,0.03462026,0.0042108605,0.0030517464,0.004527379,0.0012580323],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.1020036e-7,0.0000025908712,0.000023608212,0.000015562076,3.2039685e-7,0.000014713672,0.0009200028,0.000046969657,0.0000115924695,0.997329,0.0007660653,0.00086916256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045823617,0.0000100256975,0.0002478668,0.00029199506,0.000002222249,0.000107638276,0.0032954232,0.00026638468,0.000043930868,0.8028224,0.19290093,0.0000065620834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010264872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077275857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010264872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007987435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007192743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05795318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204738674","doi":"10.3138/ijcs.59.x.50","title":"La couverture médiatique du bilinguisme des juges de la Cour suprême du Canada","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.019578219349205516,"score_gpt":0.2966285379848838,"score_spread":0.2770503186356783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204738674","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6067264,0.0098203095,0.0017127478,0.047279343,0.00071984046,0.00007169944,0.0012177455,0.000114661954,0.3323372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9541961,0.0025056908,0.0003365121,0.0021517281,0.000077608136,0.000016955597,0.00017001216,0.000046927835,0.040498544],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951068,0.00059816055,0.00009230656,0.00041894914,0.0022423714,0.0015413793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98519844,0.0032593142,0.001259615,0.0004069004,0.0068864687,0.002989257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027970343,0.00032731553,0.00036811733,0.0021281333,0.01759964,0.0118524395,0.00072953675,0.0012759593,0.008152824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010501709,0.00027710633,0.00022323048,0.003175969,0.010127681,0.0024622818,0.00326191,0.0029384058,0.00056634453],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002437359,0.00006740921,0.0938359,0.0005403252,0.00009645128,0.0017345055,0.52546996,0.0006646189,0.0030246647,0.19163443,0.08410625,0.09858167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014432634,0.000036903457,0.13781641,0.0005866027,0.00005574594,0.00022336474,0.21274371,0.00028512403,0.0011606248,0.0033505077,0.64359736,0.00012929505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97490466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9865078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09261862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09261862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13266252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67199826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206798443","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198861577.003.0005","title":"How Institutions Influence the Appointment of Women to High Courts","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science","score_opus":0.037009031082535594,"score_gpt":0.27528212440223054,"score_spread":0.23827309331969496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206798443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57664084,0.0010508902,0.00066818204,0.0077158646,0.00007202691,0.000033106175,0.00015645329,0.000015582424,0.41364697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97723264,0.0003240422,0.00008231068,0.00047578907,0.000023471814,0.000012756111,0.000037902493,0.000012802545,0.021798393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980641,0.0010403586,0.000023686795,0.00014142285,0.00023752544,0.0004929507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99509674,0.0029443584,0.0008850382,0.00011389792,0.00027925448,0.0006807206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018898562,0.00007743133,0.00017686095,0.0007597379,0.0030882119,0.0058791093,0.0007573374,0.00055296096,0.022325775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009340536,0.00011403395,0.00009290943,0.0011890461,0.0030366643,0.0014249947,0.0017664453,0.0010273013,0.0014200561],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031614318,0.0002814602,0.15860689,0.000110379384,0.00003624176,0.0009694568,0.08920836,0.0009822825,0.00077825674,0.6558607,0.033204377,0.059645444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007233997,0.00015959745,0.32268798,0.0006150889,0.00006464914,0.0002793477,0.24236071,0.0018060502,0.0010196057,0.096370585,0.33450675,0.00005725161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01896433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056345977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022325775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042983633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020141322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07468718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207105384","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3760800","title":"The Rule of Law in Canada: Between Formal and Substantive Conceptions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Rule of law; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.014548575065742368,"score_gpt":0.2573971306363092,"score_spread":0.24284855557056684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207105384","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34642062,0.008459751,0.008336152,0.117429726,0.0003776926,0.00013089442,0.0014160838,0.00013838266,0.51729065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98062325,0.0011909856,0.0009948785,0.0018058157,0.00004554679,0.000022502873,0.00010547694,0.000041426512,0.015170056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881203,0.0016812474,0.00034080035,0.0011043896,0.0044346363,0.004318591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98015183,0.006893112,0.0012756436,0.00085053773,0.008152083,0.0026768346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063168574,0.00045479275,0.0011185932,0.0048170504,0.03089395,0.027877692,0.0040548616,0.0051642195,0.009593528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03398037,0.00063238904,0.0006023843,0.010733112,0.031411547,0.0063475478,0.0038851758,0.008308184,0.00042466674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024414328,0.000027404676,0.005078116,0.000045200337,0.000014660959,0.00007650743,0.010195661,0.0011356556,0.00006554858,0.9644332,0.008998151,0.009905638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010496471,0.000055006305,0.06624114,0.00091375434,0.00015174843,0.00016175365,0.068089955,0.010361534,0.00046992287,0.6502676,0.20282128,0.00036127504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.997693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23219863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23219863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3963561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8905408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207737894","doi":"","title":"From Ancient to Modern: Constitutionalism in Canada: De l’ancien au moderne : le constitutionnalisme au Canada","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Undergraduate Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Constitutionalism; Humanities; Political science; Legislation; Ethnology; Law; Sociology; Politics; Democracy; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03984702274597606,"score_gpt":0.30308680101337576,"score_spread":0.2632397782673997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207737894","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18942586,0.055930823,0.0034590208,0.13534586,0.001067377,0.000054699725,0.0012080533,0.00014784568,0.6133604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9119317,0.009790494,0.0011827613,0.0052601523,0.00013091,0.000014366651,0.00015118401,0.00006236115,0.07147598],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979213,0.00025176007,0.00003712834,0.00022652108,0.0008415717,0.0007218135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981146,0.00045960335,0.000096791315,0.00007811013,0.0008564721,0.00039458912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013087471,0.00022677984,0.0002370207,0.0015782695,0.018253589,0.009658491,0.0009596106,0.0017254165,0.006624502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033223238,0.00024825588,0.00021794428,0.0036905676,0.017236056,0.0022010542,0.0016743555,0.003477973,0.00024941986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003098558,0.000015031621,0.004348277,0.000104329694,0.000012957055,0.0004173886,0.026078722,0.00070779695,0.00031943218,0.89961255,0.03941115,0.028941462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019121688,0.000010052751,0.026993673,0.00027858917,0.000024786446,0.00017585872,0.016432123,0.0007424157,0.00038771488,0.034542535,0.920305,0.00008816661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9967996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7841246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21587537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18898195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9094734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210439145","doi":"","title":"Constitutional or Political Crisis? Prosecutorial Independence, the Public Interest, and Gender in the SNC-Lavalin Affair","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Independence (probability theory); Cabinet (room); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.04428104730361194,"score_gpt":0.31857816275083445,"score_spread":0.2742971154472225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3210439145","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4076067,0.0043130806,0.007214851,0.14070095,0.00075110816,0.00005071307,0.000055718825,0.000028580102,0.43927836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899227,0.0002534803,0.00021541154,0.0033362112,0.00019468847,0.000026691216,0.000006074979,0.000012065924,0.0060326755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99193114,0.0039922376,0.0002628765,0.0009602831,0.0011776321,0.0016757923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944641,0.0035692956,0.0007446511,0.00032036207,0.0003974113,0.00050426373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007814266,0.00023350937,0.0005325107,0.0009090915,0.011215461,0.0130291395,0.00124595,0.0054920814,0.0038919712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011840689,0.00034426653,0.0003394223,0.001030622,0.05778691,0.01177761,0.008664956,0.010394238,0.00032885632],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017086151,0.000010995569,0.0005701269,0.000010759464,0.0000012182442,0.00008648355,0.021683736,0.00003710113,0.00009264264,0.974038,0.0007399066,0.0027119394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045355988,0.00007615514,0.006515849,0.00025671886,0.0000151434015,0.00036016892,0.10402659,0.00062819425,0.0011244031,0.74660534,0.1402669,0.000079146084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013405873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014053245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98659414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008834427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005182544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06409854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211010767","doi":"10.1017/asjcl.2021.28","title":"Constitutional Design of Electoral Governance in Federal States","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Unitary state; Public administration; Political science; Corporate governance; Dilemma; Federalism; State (computer science); Separation of powers; Politics; Political economy; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.06165131828603472,"score_gpt":0.33879412093905,"score_spread":0.2771428026530153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211010767","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26868296,0.0012462349,0.14428003,0.0071876943,0.00025960617,0.00027995344,0.00029338195,0.00034049136,0.5774297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98632103,0.00010189293,0.0055695837,0.00017894572,0.000049424027,0.00010548952,0.00004667437,0.000019897785,0.0076070684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914806,0.004696442,0.00055823324,0.0011548778,0.0008553574,0.0012545105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99593335,0.0017464451,0.00038653918,0.001014524,0.00058474153,0.00033445912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0078056934,0.000152001,0.00038851658,0.0013333433,0.005373519,0.007781674,0.0007767536,0.0015579439,0.0069753164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008301422,0.00041322884,0.0004954084,0.0013333033,0.011848676,0.0035142077,0.0028821484,0.0019233713,0.00043566458],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030829872,0.0000032354321,0.00011895727,0.000003824824,0.0000016623017,0.000008619908,0.00021410368,0.0003353522,0.000054950207,0.9982772,0.00017513207,0.0008040172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027546595,0.000026026675,0.0010639669,0.0000443461,0.0000146471975,0.00003501534,0.00066084095,0.0031702446,0.00049245585,0.9671395,0.027306912,0.000018479172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062504997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0079821665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0078056934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006050661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003905291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043900847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3212684804","doi":"","title":"An American Jurist in London: Bruce Ackerman's Proposals for Constitutional Reform in the UK Versus Bruce Ackerman's Constitutional Theory","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Referendum; Law; Constitutional theory; Parliamentary sovereignty; Democracy; Political science; Convention; Constitutional law; Nomination; Popular sovereignty; Parliament; Sovereignty; Constitutional economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.02295335212475245,"score_gpt":0.31759723073790047,"score_spread":0.294643878613148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3212684804","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008260139,0.052638307,0.0034152518,0.6739088,0.0070948526,0.000030301866,0.000037257752,0.000029256527,0.25458586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5959805,0.03276679,0.0054706354,0.21529156,0.0077459435,0.00022830103,0.000049208753,0.00014651688,0.14232048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869409,0.008474356,0.00046433174,0.00091101864,0.00203729,0.0011720306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888666,0.007990142,0.00054088066,0.0005428342,0.0012677611,0.0007918242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009986634,0.00036530173,0.000577451,0.002432391,0.010537599,0.011604557,0.0016549692,0.011402558,0.0049483264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02385562,0.00047440705,0.00036348973,0.0025995467,0.03500929,0.010694514,0.003743647,0.0144955395,0.0011700301],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008130714,0.0000068840022,0.0000522301,0.00002029956,0.0000014125615,0.00003855627,0.003635934,0.00005061214,0.000024576762,0.96685725,0.026010828,0.0032932037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003243634,0.00001474024,0.00033893372,0.0002799074,0.000008626258,0.00005211779,0.004729884,0.00016815038,0.00006886723,0.2825671,0.7117038,0.000035426896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10943227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10544957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10943227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021006111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009652383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21759063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213682929","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0099","title":"The city in the constitutional imagination","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Megacity; Constitutionalism; Metropolitan area; Government (linguistics); Politics; Urbanization; State (computer science); City-state; Political economy; Silence; Political science; Emancipation; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Economy; Economics; Economic growth; History; Democracy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.017607447257000513,"score_gpt":0.2546349311284768,"score_spread":0.2370274838714763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213682929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053159166,0.032994945,0.012954333,0.22704953,0.0014714528,0.000024769011,0.0001342318,0.00007649486,0.672135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97319025,0.003629727,0.00093181676,0.005817813,0.00083648483,0.000029742334,0.000037146587,0.000041190684,0.015485867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99442434,0.0033720739,0.00013484771,0.0005430982,0.0007945328,0.0007311103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970606,0.0019359911,0.00014947963,0.00033462569,0.0002645087,0.00025480552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053357827,0.00036938497,0.00049045443,0.0017445799,0.012034822,0.012968573,0.0012771654,0.0045503885,0.0030271702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063712336,0.0003528326,0.00030124094,0.0018714534,0.08043929,0.009583796,0.004807293,0.0064451797,0.00030397795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.0397084e-7,6.8486094e-7,0.000018260565,0.0000033201216,2.90723e-7,0.0000067645324,0.0017451376,0.00003138891,0.0000070844585,0.9968767,0.000994175,0.00031542324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007432705,0.0000054242405,0.0001756803,0.000067749075,0.0000024142291,0.000032265176,0.007624599,0.00018364683,0.000070981936,0.8126681,0.17915359,0.000008175578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042373776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0443811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042373776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021338107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011378792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15481949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215040550","doi":"10.1017/asjcl.2021.36","title":"Constituting and Regulating Democracy: Kenya's Electoral Commission and the Courts in the 2010s","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Democracy; Remand (court procedure); Commission; Judicial deference; Politics","score_opus":0.038085011693558886,"score_gpt":0.33236658046286177,"score_spread":0.2942815687693029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215040550","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36049968,0.012276395,0.00085733295,0.071889766,0.0008374481,0.00026987164,0.00023041533,0.00002564767,0.55311346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9527952,0.0013475504,0.00039182906,0.0067962403,0.0001298722,0.00007322861,0.000032552536,0.000014365381,0.038419254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925519,0.0020469439,0.0004293603,0.00067190547,0.0012395324,0.0030603157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905077,0.0052582812,0.0012756602,0.00035747528,0.0016012271,0.0009995094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008906037,0.00029282933,0.00045597827,0.0021100785,0.029244198,0.015449156,0.001386516,0.013166342,0.0055698934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014671338,0.0007974432,0.0003420907,0.002133788,0.013550258,0.0053054723,0.0043435306,0.008979528,0.00038327536],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063206804,0.00005565541,0.0053016543,0.0001306412,0.000016492222,0.0017134943,0.02675507,0.0003004703,0.00055936666,0.9414322,0.015033312,0.008638419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015927538,0.00015221663,0.048658587,0.0020868392,0.00012578325,0.00064156466,0.065623395,0.0011383925,0.0029557166,0.081440695,0.79662436,0.00039320072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30375066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5819109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30375066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039899167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030432599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6039653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215872208","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3714","title":"Positive Charter Rights: When Can We Open the “Door?”","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; McGill University","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Fundamental rights; Reservation of rights; Framing (construction); International human rights law; Law and economics; Human rights; Right to property; Sociology","score_opus":0.031063321784814014,"score_gpt":0.2940116822626364,"score_spread":0.2629483604778224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215872208","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028607178,0.0057869516,0.020998199,0.52121454,0.0015976373,0.00008256588,0.00015319257,0.00012252798,0.42143726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9040826,0.0032889664,0.009077292,0.048042655,0.0007733857,0.000106897176,0.00010397542,0.00012734161,0.03439693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9808817,0.005609514,0.00036789372,0.0017258585,0.0064529628,0.004962177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9845762,0.0059291776,0.00096307317,0.0013913604,0.0047550933,0.0023851737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017679648,0.00051136175,0.0008121515,0.0016474458,0.016327249,0.018510059,0.0034714115,0.008893759,0.0074103656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03688187,0.0005324538,0.00064711453,0.0013444672,0.065949455,0.028903546,0.0055748345,0.015353745,0.0010893268],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004162307,0.0000073361293,0.0001895417,0.000013576643,0.0000018298742,0.000028429016,0.0020053012,0.000058028,0.00005239734,0.985941,0.006387474,0.005311004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000152201155,0.000018876712,0.0008514757,0.00028605032,0.000013946371,0.000045845765,0.007811833,0.00033862903,0.00045100422,0.8554865,0.13462012,0.000060413655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41869107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4780542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41869107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02957281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07504317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.832508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217106214","doi":"10.1086/716786","title":"Giving Succor to Extremism?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Courts","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Free speech; Political science; Politics; Violent extremism; Law; Human rights; Speech act; Law and economics; Terrorism; Sociology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.02902656697894096,"score_gpt":0.30602295462387435,"score_spread":0.2769963876449334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217106214","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73692775,0.0026134413,0.0050988025,0.091163374,0.00072908367,0.00004694138,0.000112358066,0.000048529015,0.16325963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99547464,0.0002674531,0.00012278736,0.002435589,0.00026401164,0.000005283097,0.000013888873,0.0000062059516,0.0014100451],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99078536,0.005177139,0.00051145453,0.00074127055,0.0011963254,0.0015884675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92925006,0.04187462,0.0131352665,0.0041124746,0.0049338914,0.0066935797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009246824,0.00019369274,0.00039772046,0.0016203868,0.00368752,0.0041307714,0.0008233971,0.0034781168,0.009429277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09207582,0.00018249862,0.00028149062,0.0008110822,0.008038338,0.0024875079,0.0019099242,0.0046362663,0.0008714595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000678403,0.00045924896,0.37011102,0.00048950664,0.00032886775,0.008035112,0.038451016,0.0010610439,0.0023250852,0.41233397,0.035953335,0.12977351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013772039,0.0005989711,0.22776593,0.0017419145,0.00033991074,0.008911482,0.061470095,0.0028388584,0.0035190426,0.5608344,0.13164468,0.00019710195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019455865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042123846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009429277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010976875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011363514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048902452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217180017","doi":"10.5509/2021944707","title":"Life of a Nation’s Text: The Travels and Travails of the Indian Constitution","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific Affairs","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Constitutionalism; Democracy; Constitution of India; Law; Political science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.02185161892354444,"score_gpt":0.2477458469252832,"score_spread":0.22589422800173875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217180017","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04359987,0.078127876,0.0011288836,0.079556406,0.0053197118,0.000016003012,0.00013452089,0.00006661623,0.79205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8181001,0.07160395,0.000687503,0.010190452,0.003858301,0.00003922027,0.00016612269,0.00013554856,0.095218785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818593,0.00096875394,0.000056236422,0.00010878783,0.00042956765,0.00025067717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985033,0.0007647296,0.00013694073,0.00015354781,0.00024430282,0.00019728983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011353255,0.00023122958,0.00025962765,0.0018225992,0.010563907,0.010289608,0.0006270751,0.0010018632,0.0057179634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034922182,0.00017620265,0.0002011495,0.0030608315,0.014760859,0.006422687,0.0029893934,0.0037091235,0.0009260088],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026271875,0.000018756084,0.0011613122,0.0003049209,0.000012359711,0.00058358203,0.15738526,0.000082259845,0.00029061228,0.72597677,0.056895312,0.057262577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015435868,0.000009902588,0.002461672,0.00045497506,0.000008700435,0.00028268574,0.082468554,0.000027363107,0.00011854589,0.024169987,0.8899804,0.000015679761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02655039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054243706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02655039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005882379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069775535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052791655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W323151633","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199578610.013.0041","title":"Judicial Independence as a Constitutional Virtue","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Normative; Judicial independence; Virtue; Law and economics; Politics; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Sociology; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04475587756609455,"score_gpt":0.32161050117442663,"score_spread":0.2768546236083321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W323151633","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030774396,0.0014894843,0.025990376,0.010886581,0.00015842397,0.000025446117,0.000037876805,0.000036222904,0.93060124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9714063,0.00083140406,0.0042959023,0.0018317284,0.00033614485,0.00008267821,0.00003886575,0.00003363271,0.021143386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911409,0.004131788,0.00029120856,0.0010071888,0.0025982726,0.0008305465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99160576,0.00508123,0.0006502156,0.0012871784,0.00096615514,0.00040940824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007867914,0.00025065138,0.0004884681,0.0017915862,0.005639362,0.0072999196,0.0011114267,0.0030122346,0.0056168186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010302566,0.00032052066,0.00046205206,0.0012843271,0.035392966,0.0068183313,0.005370576,0.0055115866,0.00067664945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.4615084e-7,0.0000027560252,0.000033169097,0.0000033884885,5.014114e-7,0.0000042429,0.00019839965,0.000051170435,0.000020894027,0.9987006,0.00020214688,0.0007818198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010544689,0.000013926715,0.0004925096,0.00007426069,0.0000061924675,0.000033431534,0.00044290637,0.00035458046,0.00024201305,0.9536974,0.044623516,0.000008720686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020875789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002858897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007867914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033766737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061893896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041610003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W334677990","doi":"10.7202/1034051ar","title":"Constitutional Amendment by Stealth","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Boston College","keywords":"Constitutional amendment; Legitimacy; Political science; Constitution; Deliberation; Law; Democracy; Politics; Convention; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.07335461904596215,"score_gpt":0.3288064311958844,"score_spread":0.25545181214992224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W334677990","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035019793,0.0018456241,0.09428502,0.015748061,0.0008930194,0.00020242773,0.0001843616,0.0002550341,0.8515667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90441567,0.000885173,0.013222583,0.0063004126,0.00047476098,0.00027494488,0.00015622503,0.00013001841,0.07414025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98751044,0.004735635,0.0006798444,0.0025193403,0.0026827317,0.0018720601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900591,0.0042796987,0.00076957355,0.0033639215,0.0012022881,0.00032553432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011269007,0.0003599052,0.0004690856,0.0015611374,0.005644327,0.006638682,0.0011870074,0.004082812,0.006672511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021996949,0.00035540623,0.00074979686,0.0011537442,0.030715384,0.0054163705,0.005130892,0.00632852,0.0011779218],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027932172,0.0000028629984,0.00008446599,0.0000054041298,0.0000016752775,0.000013405001,0.00035095538,0.000091151305,0.000068478745,0.99684674,0.0007191633,0.0018128164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023779734,0.000046048874,0.0005756983,0.00012586114,0.000014424514,0.00012326009,0.00052187603,0.00069298607,0.0009883898,0.7981872,0.19866602,0.000034433142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007980279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009381426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011269007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051534665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008477264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059596896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W343874663","doi":"","title":"Remedial Consensus and Dialogue Under the Charter: General Declarations and Delayed Declarations of Invalidity","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Jurisdiction; Remedial education; Appeal; Antipathy; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04298341276198668,"score_gpt":0.27683562427799424,"score_spread":0.23385221151600755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W343874663","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36743557,0.008183014,0.038337946,0.18458353,0.0011129449,0.00016443014,0.00011896101,0.0001972933,0.39986625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835957,0.0004936638,0.0016737723,0.00406209,0.00010493671,0.000018960845,0.000012232029,0.00001219078,0.010026543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9694676,0.011792191,0.0010679245,0.0025575822,0.009181692,0.0059330156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97386444,0.014870589,0.0032074186,0.002001149,0.0044779005,0.0015785181],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025283605,0.00029862678,0.0005488796,0.0014093006,0.0144998785,0.013016729,0.002495264,0.008928173,0.0029352729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05975793,0.00030770493,0.0004031805,0.0015514495,0.03080337,0.008363023,0.008257075,0.010731852,0.00023242406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020017287,0.000016138996,0.00082451594,0.000042042127,0.000004900384,0.00034344938,0.032061346,0.00044330722,0.0004117142,0.9485209,0.004364702,0.012946955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009763595,0.0001481708,0.0099560935,0.0006040646,0.00007408431,0.00082462985,0.094457604,0.0034048667,0.002847784,0.5083066,0.37899432,0.00028414483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26237172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32997233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26237172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030084876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05021756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52168906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W348787066","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1256","title":"Constitutionalism from the Top Down","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Legislature; Charter; Constitutional theory; Supreme court; Law; Premise; Political science; Judicial review; Legislation; Judicial interpretation; Law and economics; Interpretation (philosophy); Separation of powers; Sociology; Constitutional law; Democracy; Epistemology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028576512744437246,"score_gpt":0.29817402246976893,"score_spread":0.2695975097253317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W348787066","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016274154,0.0095005715,0.07209762,0.08142731,0.0010414717,0.00005817161,0.00022753354,0.000138259,0.81923497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9143226,0.00358074,0.012116762,0.011874212,0.0016861672,0.00014896005,0.0001248837,0.00017888764,0.05596686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939867,0.0025639283,0.00019031786,0.0012256217,0.0014854213,0.00054800493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971686,0.0014602559,0.00012831498,0.00059464516,0.00043706608,0.00021120768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004424318,0.0003289579,0.0005986371,0.001418809,0.0042769266,0.010456354,0.0011609857,0.0024041508,0.006527288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008874048,0.00031507053,0.0005655869,0.00086309365,0.027473802,0.009021306,0.0036756734,0.007649547,0.000967626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014420644,0.00000158891,0.000022252903,0.000007596468,0.0000013155602,0.000007777941,0.00028284005,0.00008048058,0.00003123711,0.99724054,0.0008846716,0.0014383149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042877255,0.000004461043,0.000067282665,0.000032791202,0.0000027964802,0.000012523373,0.00018267796,0.00016924493,0.00008843633,0.9555112,0.043920238,0.000004047735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042704237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034480316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010456354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006650188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004762221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048250735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W361335273","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1033","title":"\"Was it Something I Said?\": Losing the Majority on the Modern Supreme Court of Canada, 1984-2011","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Appeal; Law; Phenomenon; Position (finance); Political science; Swing; Persuasion; Social psychology; Psychology; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0516525433061658,"score_gpt":0.27889134604270555,"score_spread":0.22723880273653974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W361335273","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71528566,0.008324906,0.00043372574,0.1356229,0.0010939887,0.000089383066,0.0016282696,0.000048863527,0.1374723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93938035,0.0014955245,0.00014428432,0.00942878,0.0001551064,0.00001793526,0.00018898849,0.000024816787,0.049164318],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99362373,0.00049877365,0.00008530338,0.0004760339,0.0028218897,0.0024942285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99311477,0.00087999465,0.0004246502,0.000117956646,0.0038876056,0.0015749285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036058794,0.00024263804,0.00042387607,0.0013040836,0.04429294,0.0070881816,0.0017625735,0.0029573727,0.005302428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0141713265,0.00037381417,0.00021949457,0.0029381337,0.0070963777,0.0017543671,0.0027958453,0.0070393193,0.00044738472],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033570486,0.00019176259,0.13061129,0.00023322867,0.00011551235,0.0019563169,0.18950447,0.00071823417,0.0011600697,0.11978093,0.4629468,0.09244565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003470552,0.000060334904,0.42427966,0.00036671603,0.00008952615,0.00024471528,0.14388083,0.0006937584,0.000842828,0.0063867876,0.42293596,0.00018410735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99493533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13631739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13631739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12364554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9890565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W362437993","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1067","title":"Book Notes: Against Judicial Activism: The Decline of Freedom and Democracy in Canada, by Rory Leishman","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.024548785037162717,"score_gpt":0.24341363280102496,"score_spread":0.21886484776386225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W362437993","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029323886,0.047858063,0.0003482133,0.8115185,0.006734778,0.000040902327,0.00047584428,0.000042215357,0.13004924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08890579,0.054839045,0.0010153883,0.28113365,0.0069234846,0.00012968399,0.00028903355,0.00020678548,0.5665572],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833566,0.0002860676,0.00004575318,0.00019386137,0.0007199884,0.0004187813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964372,0.0016987646,0.00012200186,0.00008440584,0.0012218065,0.00043586502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016018937,0.0007544826,0.0005783993,0.00206688,0.02206569,0.011116036,0.0022773305,0.012045429,0.015711596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006927243,0.00059991254,0.00042551692,0.0048146024,0.011240453,0.0060489755,0.001622885,0.01097201,0.0017108211],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005692055,0.000008470129,0.00022741691,0.000042585787,0.0000026751547,0.000039849754,0.0014488146,0.00009562797,0.000019106814,0.061944917,0.93155843,0.0046064756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022333381,0.000007735837,0.0026560565,0.0002861299,0.000013254977,0.000041646887,0.008272456,0.00015690309,0.00011878811,0.021193108,0.9671915,0.00004016874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96708125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99001604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043889787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043889787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.083052576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3184442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W364420650","doi":"","title":"Judicial Review, a Comparative Perspective: Israel, Canada, and the United States","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Political science; Judicial review; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.02409716982109236,"score_gpt":0.3242096136020626,"score_spread":0.30011244378097024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W364420650","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1893645,0.14658606,0.0007464413,0.22015785,0.00091581926,0.00007598584,0.0007137273,0.00002560977,0.44141406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9545698,0.020011872,0.00021580044,0.012393022,0.0004953822,0.000033205,0.00013045766,0.00002308495,0.012127349],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98890567,0.0029147267,0.00017904204,0.00043361925,0.0032076782,0.004359221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9732203,0.013212733,0.0016551772,0.0003976951,0.009127137,0.0023869534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007924836,0.00034593506,0.0011370726,0.008251185,0.020427218,0.018354984,0.0027656988,0.0060233334,0.0076484033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029853296,0.00034236032,0.00054028135,0.017528811,0.020458996,0.0042252187,0.002112584,0.004690296,0.0002593911],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013016349,0.00011464681,0.009236357,0.00026250802,0.00008047501,0.0005079869,0.013440603,0.0012182967,0.00012398654,0.8928424,0.055452406,0.026590126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033629997,0.00014673955,0.14432923,0.003079597,0.00041540415,0.0004567104,0.13873184,0.0020826291,0.0006448406,0.18818083,0.52135324,0.0002426517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95461893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9825784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.119613856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.119613856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16266614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8678633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W36673133","doi":"10.21991/c9gd4z","title":"SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND THE SAME OLD CONSTITUTION*","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Politics; Law; Political science; Constitution; Political question; Institution; Same sex; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.03515265728374515,"score_gpt":0.26173373985162673,"score_spread":0.2265810825678816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W36673133","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017240118,0.008333376,0.0012035993,0.050725035,0.0015468115,0.00002378236,0.00019170511,0.000031688578,0.92070395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57486606,0.0047292775,0.0009526559,0.02631516,0.00058300316,0.00003540603,0.00021106095,0.000041196654,0.39226624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978951,0.00029131226,0.00003150959,0.0002014504,0.00065483345,0.00092573994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938226,0.00007630762,0.000035279394,0.0000754166,0.00028316837,0.00014758758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011598952,0.00023007307,0.00021678783,0.0005366678,0.009514565,0.004818178,0.0008094882,0.00215055,0.00936907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017769658,0.00013775784,0.00020252782,0.00080951327,0.0123249795,0.0014981776,0.001574403,0.004218337,0.0008896365],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059836907,0.00000603956,0.00032913315,0.000005419209,0.0000015739245,0.00005234608,0.0009965997,0.000027849408,0.00005787931,0.977344,0.016166694,0.005006497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010634965,0.000010429406,0.0054766913,0.0000957967,0.000008146828,0.00011699071,0.0020468317,0.00012817854,0.00019236135,0.094374746,0.8975211,0.000018196164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7394285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8745072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7394285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01844882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026912693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52421206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W37532511","doi":"10.1212/wnl.0000000000207738","title":"La riforma costituzionale della giustizia: separazione delle carriere e status del pubblico ministero","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rivista trimestrale di diritto e procedura civile","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.0432275909107419,"score_gpt":0.28990156395138816,"score_spread":0.24667397304064625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W37532511","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98808527,0.0011853109,0.000169668,0.0010412444,0.000018874307,0.000027070639,0.00025152738,0.000007631745,0.00921337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990245,0.00018231352,0.00007120767,0.000038992282,0.00002243698,0.000006833384,0.000054203258,0.00000405867,0.00059542526],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989042,0.00027059446,0.00006557104,0.00014470294,0.00028673268,0.00032814647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99391645,0.001654011,0.0025998126,0.0005556651,0.0005080246,0.00076600426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001551881,0.0001906235,0.00029983264,0.0025854327,0.0007056705,0.0016857225,0.0005720099,0.0005773979,0.010632172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009160473,0.00016035336,0.0004326502,0.001679135,0.0015688908,0.0009686651,0.0014711433,0.0009047622,0.00051239587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015259192,0.00008115898,0.9821962,0.000050021772,0.000063504966,0.0002137775,0.0015540783,0.000030779363,0.00032547352,0.0023882117,0.00036830278,0.012575856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000076563565,0.00008170317,0.9957573,0.000046030586,0.00008156444,0.00030123536,0.0016251011,0.00011790394,0.000115651375,0.00040081586,0.0014585272,0.0000065461936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024537966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022085208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024537966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008001728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012170161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048790336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W37792945","doi":"10.1126/sciadv.adk5670","title":"Policy, legal, and constitutional implications of Chaoulli v. Quebec","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Advances","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03067527393966956,"score_gpt":0.3461197924075687,"score_spread":0.3154445184678991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W37792945","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15839769,0.009918906,0.0014128779,0.37504807,0.0007719398,0.00021888592,0.0017439437,0.00009739458,0.45239034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.877911,0.0019841457,0.00079456286,0.0484347,0.00024708555,0.00014569695,0.00017711907,0.000025538964,0.070280105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99563885,0.000765438,0.00010199963,0.0003829538,0.00093637407,0.002174431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991856,0.004187188,0.00031301114,0.00025646994,0.0024388207,0.00094857113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050118323,0.00026866977,0.00046245588,0.0012853777,0.017116006,0.007856168,0.002533313,0.009376286,0.008479103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011635214,0.0003803373,0.00044406616,0.001816134,0.007075424,0.001828184,0.0012782315,0.0071380734,0.00028094635],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011245512,0.00007332152,0.009109752,0.00011112909,0.000037949423,0.0007603803,0.0034460563,0.0018158185,0.0009849004,0.8960441,0.0744483,0.013055776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043994212,0.00017640137,0.08576924,0.00092933635,0.00035746445,0.00037747817,0.012155593,0.011598108,0.003036452,0.13929929,0.7453601,0.0005006055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99057347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99383473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10653724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10653724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14099917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7729854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W408162197","doi":"10.3138/9781442621039","title":"Brian Dickson: A Judge's Journey","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Political science; Biography; Economic Justice; Institution; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.043454937718561515,"score_gpt":0.3001841140664117,"score_spread":0.2567291763478502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W408162197","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046535893,0.08040918,0.0005155872,0.56559724,0.015956398,0.000035073877,0.00020180608,0.00009345418,0.33253762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11882048,0.06454129,0.0012900776,0.20378353,0.006235154,0.00007158698,0.00018122159,0.0002889926,0.6047877],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99654984,0.0006537574,0.00008933848,0.00029881197,0.0016520001,0.0007561836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948827,0.0012322908,0.00008316979,0.0000928954,0.0022483475,0.0014606466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021982787,0.00038023197,0.0005014765,0.0018980182,0.02436128,0.009876334,0.0011050743,0.006524706,0.012930438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008082319,0.00044342745,0.00025621642,0.002266979,0.00768168,0.004179544,0.0021631112,0.009007863,0.0033355276],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004965128,0.00001068903,0.00013698188,0.000026619882,0.0000016613848,0.00036012972,0.0044617364,0.00002241625,0.00007100693,0.08235169,0.9025123,0.010039736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019109407,0.0000025415006,0.00011153851,0.00007443216,0.000001123053,0.00010323007,0.0023223986,0.000011279611,0.000019506822,0.003895697,0.9934483,0.000008102184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47665244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71770674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47665244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030357627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040395826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94775605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200113419","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12340092","title":"Editor’s Note","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Graduate students; Library science; Editorial board; Medical education; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.033364975740074965,"score_gpt":0.33871993353317564,"score_spread":0.3053549577931007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200113419","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001089085,0.0018407138,0.00026845004,0.15799803,0.8322131,0.00005943271,0.00026239376,0.00019377931,0.007055212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003316479,0.0033798206,0.0012934627,0.21921535,0.705125,0.00016619916,0.00022723904,0.0003291886,0.06694734],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98525965,0.0013246974,0.0017456448,0.0026855085,0.008046363,0.0009379976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8978,0.013340604,0.004819685,0.0035005352,0.074513905,0.006025221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0100230435,0.0019093788,0.0023992665,0.0023439953,0.004306708,0.009979258,0.0046889563,0.011205228,0.044670533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.111876,0.0009106394,0.0021162531,0.0018752374,0.0023408118,0.005698127,0.0024700828,0.016965799,0.045855176],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008003638,0.0000046671985,0.000037031325,0.00004551961,0.0000031880995,0.00005486609,0.000020822039,0.000009327035,0.000025794405,0.00029751746,0.9960525,0.0034408667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009963254,0.000010887896,0.0001774741,0.00020086166,0.0000069568987,0.00018340973,0.00007458686,0.00006317392,0.0001090482,0.0005351438,0.99861205,0.000016423308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002835311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005858978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044670533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036913936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012040942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14943779},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200446431","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-88704-9_1","title":"Legal Foundations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Future of business and finance","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Political science; Law; Legal realism; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Legal research; Law and economics; Democracy; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.019267282782617468,"score_gpt":0.24774003795693336,"score_spread":0.2284727551743159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200446431","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00054424815,0.0013999159,0.0021558658,0.007901947,0.00028346878,0.000019588688,0.00006781705,0.000019096871,0.987608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09859172,0.0022140876,0.0020634024,0.009619714,0.0012093432,0.00016124267,0.00013997668,0.00007639574,0.8859241],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985049,0.00049961073,0.000038126913,0.00025197526,0.00050024793,0.00020524497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987847,0.0005662273,0.000054079865,0.00019163088,0.0003249319,0.00007850802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016855908,0.00042908,0.00045690415,0.0012676368,0.0046702907,0.00711608,0.0010598217,0.0052407975,0.05004836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041242074,0.00034993567,0.00028378755,0.00084339787,0.009235228,0.004549507,0.0017646108,0.0061899824,0.009920262],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.5901827e-7,0.0000037292866,0.0000067668684,0.0000034761836,3.3831532e-7,0.000005413406,0.00008666928,0.00002221731,0.000009035264,0.9838008,0.014201873,0.0018589653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030615079,0.0000023768762,0.00006134255,0.000044743952,0.0000012857772,0.000020801484,0.00012681051,0.00013254693,0.000044332413,0.6742961,0.32526338,0.0000032116898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011876305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0153431725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05004836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005782941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004589964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16742843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205190003","doi":"10.1017/cls.2021.42","title":"The Attorney General, Politics, and the Public Interest: Contributions to an Evolving Constitutional Convention","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Convention; Public interest; Duty; Discretion; Normative; Objectivity (philosophy); Politics; Constitution; Independence (probability theory); Transparency (behavior); Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02730702609206853,"score_gpt":0.28871325788954577,"score_spread":0.26140623179747724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205190003","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028921736,0.015588797,0.018208979,0.63824236,0.0026292691,0.000087334425,0.000102232705,0.000082373794,0.29613695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91972655,0.006098915,0.013478493,0.037509352,0.0031577463,0.0001067344,0.000057148947,0.00009220713,0.019772904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9673515,0.016032161,0.0011582952,0.002703565,0.0096627725,0.0030917418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94359386,0.038995136,0.0018557777,0.0038293418,0.007855291,0.0038705794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05656045,0.00042495326,0.00088185014,0.003845827,0.019032503,0.043188073,0.004011362,0.020402024,0.0031846142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04105899,0.00064321613,0.00063218235,0.0042049405,0.11156536,0.013786013,0.008933221,0.022045938,0.00031489006],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016585101,0.000005100081,0.0000725099,0.000004431112,8.837005e-7,0.0000149728985,0.0010517956,0.00010542182,0.0000148725385,0.99596125,0.0012477743,0.0015193133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002032041,0.000012971866,0.0006921209,0.0001966653,0.000012117301,0.00003841195,0.00292148,0.0009839626,0.00016258493,0.84376687,0.15113391,0.00005857412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28991693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30374655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71008307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06147229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09103357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5764589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205734915","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006226","title":"The Coxford Lecture: Arbitrariness","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Supreme court; Law; Rule of law; Power (physics); Order (exchange); Political science; Public law; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.016492290511753098,"score_gpt":0.2696170006024874,"score_spread":0.2531247100907343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205734915","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026806223,0.21676321,0.010514776,0.28091335,0.014730584,0.000019276627,0.000080913276,0.00006210069,0.4742352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4401484,0.15236238,0.0076996023,0.04349956,0.048272245,0.00016469971,0.00010382747,0.00030511396,0.30744413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972132,0.0011904027,0.00009003949,0.00038976507,0.00084094127,0.00027575376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995014,0.003972742,0.00014497731,0.00030062953,0.00039910665,0.00016851537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00455829,0.0005484189,0.0005559683,0.0013725178,0.0044337274,0.006417267,0.0008626246,0.0047707283,0.014817324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00940499,0.0005055467,0.0006813672,0.0013123757,0.015989607,0.009893597,0.001743836,0.009887601,0.0027887127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005510644,0.0000049756327,0.000025019137,0.000022502742,0.000002334001,0.000024353994,0.00020148575,0.00009292368,0.000025684629,0.9584892,0.03653057,0.0045753885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008643965,0.000006988883,0.00010718066,0.00019398455,0.0000035014953,0.000037589376,0.0001295865,0.00032453783,0.00006988213,0.689715,0.30939266,0.000010444208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012347247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0102056675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014817324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008779362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035751143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06369901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205991489","doi":"10.17762/de.vol2022iss1.8686","title":"Shedding a Light on the Rights of the Accused: An Indian Perspective","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Design Engineering","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Period (music); Faith; Cover (algebra); Good faith; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.022987090253094904,"score_gpt":0.2525576807186526,"score_spread":0.2295705904655577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205991489","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060235824,0.020330653,0.031062046,0.18208684,0.0013361563,0.00018100628,0.00012712303,0.00006952095,0.70457083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92563564,0.016418941,0.008560476,0.018590089,0.0014040008,0.00023263639,0.000044432047,0.00009413174,0.029019633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94986355,0.034049835,0.0014531786,0.0023121084,0.008851746,0.00346956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9549553,0.035486303,0.0018843857,0.0035841805,0.0027364125,0.0013534667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022634935,0.00060758926,0.0009749463,0.004108378,0.015628617,0.029496983,0.004215842,0.009275039,0.006898296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024942573,0.00083422614,0.0010782009,0.0041343607,0.10957253,0.012902412,0.010184414,0.019004524,0.00097377895],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050407875,0.00002108766,0.00008981965,0.000045667915,0.0000026483585,0.000054722328,0.008270271,0.00008387216,0.00010715164,0.98825014,0.00048182294,0.0025877103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000196844,0.00013235037,0.0013421995,0.0008034008,0.00004814285,0.0003500188,0.030155286,0.000703804,0.0008911981,0.8373466,0.12811518,0.00009211567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015623651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013949825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029496983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012488334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016153896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11970645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206204301","doi":"10.7202/1068168ar","title":"THE EQUAL RIGHTS TRUST","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Internet privacy; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.027968082917711964,"score_gpt":0.27373986516243115,"score_spread":0.24577178224471918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206204301","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001893265,0.02201998,0.0016491162,0.23681495,0.0050006253,0.0000637976,0.00061580783,0.00013925563,0.7318032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14278743,0.012342893,0.0017379113,0.07718591,0.0023369312,0.00022452153,0.0004829708,0.00025295446,0.7626485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.987491,0.0023152055,0.00066696835,0.0016911709,0.005259443,0.0025762105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98221886,0.0045395615,0.0012774887,0.0026383947,0.0071276412,0.0021981192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00791009,0.0006068089,0.0008451524,0.0012357427,0.008606625,0.014845059,0.0018272835,0.014772264,0.035378788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030307928,0.00054349506,0.0004885645,0.0017189713,0.009184343,0.0066809864,0.0036378494,0.0116116805,0.010255962],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012915848,0.000009981984,0.0003422372,0.000051825744,0.000007838222,0.00008876268,0.00047462375,0.00007244571,0.000059819293,0.67269355,0.30454588,0.021640195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007908183,0.000006402446,0.0005159442,0.0003348186,0.000008150738,0.00006530102,0.00033414454,0.00008533087,0.00006968256,0.046836633,0.9517197,0.00001593592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24837866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26291713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75162137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017400471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058528565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4938659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206248230","doi":"10.21991/c9qx0s","title":"CONSTITUTIONAL DIALOGUES BETWEEN COURTS AND LEGISLATURES: CAN WE TALK?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Democracy; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.05817665794960814,"score_gpt":0.2739440819670126,"score_spread":0.21576742401740445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206248230","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01268,0.038023733,0.014515124,0.74732643,0.0039346716,0.00004837832,0.00012757142,0.00012172484,0.1832223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85108614,0.024019737,0.0066820476,0.08817439,0.0070604696,0.0002686263,0.00014642837,0.00030654116,0.022255681],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9446834,0.045188606,0.00075816485,0.0020522035,0.004349799,0.002967901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94669056,0.043202706,0.002752732,0.0021452173,0.0025323287,0.002676392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03222701,0.0007421845,0.0011658347,0.0037870295,0.019533109,0.029776,0.003572038,0.015023855,0.017008271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06670661,0.00080122607,0.0008056559,0.004254363,0.05563354,0.06256388,0.010473444,0.020097014,0.0026063763],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013929066,0.000016696655,0.00033051576,0.0001074415,0.000011491671,0.00009309369,0.037146986,0.000062060324,0.000047194866,0.9354483,0.018238032,0.008484211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025914276,0.000018803496,0.0006098105,0.00089845114,0.00001362085,0.00012023826,0.053382844,0.00019969494,0.00013931318,0.70845604,0.23609649,0.00003875585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00605384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062566125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03222701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010047103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008510462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17043477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206636438","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226474.003.0001","title":"Introduction","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Constitution; Political science; Meaning (existential); Law; Politics; Federalism; Constitutional interpretation; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02554990798535728,"score_gpt":0.23755364328987003,"score_spread":0.21200373530451275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206636438","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00034254947,0.0027450225,0.0010556051,0.0039063897,0.002373107,0.000052374588,0.00094057247,0.00025070872,0.9883337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0029276335,0.0017957145,0.00067635067,0.0019952767,0.00050679105,0.00004247905,0.00075465,0.00014975316,0.9911514],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991385,0.00011707195,0.000037465183,0.0002423253,0.00035847528,0.00010609321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993531,0.00012632788,0.00002985052,0.00011184923,0.00026756828,0.0001112606],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005526198,0.0006370552,0.0006262252,0.0011804006,0.0024414998,0.0056693354,0.0015023586,0.0026802348,0.49169853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021292788,0.00026397017,0.000499511,0.0016068798,0.001455957,0.0043021,0.0028057392,0.0026273434,0.26790515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000216715,0.000025297652,0.00015689652,0.00014521882,0.000002538745,0.0000982833,0.00049959787,0.00007826604,0.00017304717,0.13418658,0.77772903,0.08688352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.927882e-7,0.0000030105646,0.00006297759,0.000044378306,4.2407262e-7,0.00003825281,0.00006207357,0.000009916012,0.000017536877,0.0029298905,0.9968291,0.0000014101851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004346355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061091348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5083015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024061254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002197276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7250303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206658582","doi":"10.2478/vjls-2021-0006","title":"Constitutional Theories of Emergency Powers and their Limits: Perspectives from Vietnam, India and Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Vietnamese Journal of Legal Sciences","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Public Works and Government Services Canada","funders":"","keywords":"State of emergency; Legislature; State (computer science); Political science; Attribution; Separation of powers; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Politics; Mathematics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.015141841555293497,"score_gpt":0.27465145225914667,"score_spread":0.25950961070385314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206658582","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18768091,0.011198292,0.0029921203,0.033157043,0.00013210821,0.00006514416,0.00023112354,0.000026490798,0.7645168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899885,0.00333423,0.0004022958,0.0007002543,0.000027364225,0.000022062002,0.00004056299,0.0000080939035,0.0054766205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832016,0.00055620703,0.00003702965,0.00011654057,0.000394278,0.00057574944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958326,0.0024736112,0.0002388158,0.00016540772,0.0008373375,0.000452241],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018348597,0.00023384714,0.0003380202,0.0025442725,0.009658588,0.00811457,0.001358205,0.0012969355,0.004374421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045099403,0.00018045439,0.00020328174,0.0041230638,0.022277288,0.0026997032,0.0021172876,0.0037135738,0.00012395025],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040157925,0.000004942987,0.0006443339,0.000025220643,0.0000015310015,0.0001652209,0.008528626,0.0005031277,0.000015890631,0.9865623,0.00131708,0.0022276582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040084506,0.000029358464,0.01115383,0.0012197403,0.000032714834,0.0005180508,0.17947043,0.0055889897,0.00025812755,0.50979704,0.29180136,0.00009034553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.806833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82532865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19316697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052154347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03615934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3886091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W42093933","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1022","title":"The New Borders of the Constitutional","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Charter; Scholarship; Pragmatism; Constitutional theory; Normative; Politics; Object (grammar); Political science; Liberal democracy; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Democracy; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018122374446970718,"score_gpt":0.2773363973950021,"score_spread":0.25921402294803136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W42093933","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036745477,0.046375506,0.055151142,0.34979263,0.004589587,0.000090160356,0.00023970279,0.00015376057,0.50686204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92342275,0.012628644,0.015487125,0.018592138,0.004535094,0.000276479,0.00012513678,0.00018192471,0.024750633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98555124,0.007653318,0.0006483289,0.0024577759,0.0025958768,0.0010934736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97477597,0.015687386,0.00085937156,0.0051188483,0.0022063123,0.0013521714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017595815,0.00037293194,0.0007863026,0.002563642,0.007060562,0.018397743,0.001958515,0.006570512,0.008769529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021748247,0.00044247022,0.00055244495,0.0015462862,0.08396945,0.033629477,0.008394549,0.011770047,0.00073558267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004142527,0.0000039604906,0.000034958724,0.000011189923,7.4709726e-7,0.000010426416,0.0010533567,0.00003380908,0.000023043434,0.99506515,0.0010856502,0.002673659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072697335,0.000007744216,0.00013630133,0.00012976045,0.0000021620626,0.000032838157,0.0017528557,0.00014559572,0.00006042587,0.892582,0.10513379,0.000009135705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034712928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031072325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018397743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010247103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009571348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09305668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210783218","doi":"10.4000/essais.10978","title":"Image(s) et Constitution(s). Un regard français sur le savoir constitutionnel canadien","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Essais","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.037445637951037156,"score_gpt":0.2612851350502604,"score_spread":0.22383949709922324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210783218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07744778,0.012022443,0.008807445,0.07727757,0.0008699503,0.000028828914,0.00008258988,0.000036198235,0.82342714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9625362,0.0016451934,0.0007740356,0.002010165,0.00016583,0.000023108398,0.000019169305,0.000027209762,0.032799162],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942778,0.0034019554,0.00013567475,0.00063648325,0.00089982955,0.00064825395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956442,0.002502241,0.00041300108,0.00047358553,0.00060073426,0.0003662946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052621923,0.00034365235,0.00036050947,0.0017033005,0.008593639,0.010642625,0.00077134283,0.0037044943,0.0065785497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010249037,0.00023020229,0.0003116258,0.001426209,0.054485302,0.007693768,0.004084468,0.0048194285,0.00056957285],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026190512,0.0000023135674,0.00009601425,0.000009018204,7.138576e-7,0.000018048977,0.005513246,0.000011549714,0.000035029756,0.99240243,0.00067428534,0.0012345982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001887671,0.000034515226,0.001990905,0.0003009655,0.00001249458,0.00016712223,0.02419314,0.00021554847,0.00037217198,0.67812157,0.29454318,0.000029532632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019122368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021403177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9944067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005593319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044272724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040582538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210901948","doi":"10.3138/9781487533717-003","title":"A Brief History of the Mega-Constitutional Era in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mega-; Political science; History; Astronomy; Physics","score_opus":0.02385562432856807,"score_gpt":0.1924373742280567,"score_spread":0.16858174989948863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210901948","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0124676,0.06521203,0.0006987946,0.06219743,0.0013607686,0.00007542139,0.0015185663,0.0001326253,0.8563368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3451487,0.08588068,0.0019113737,0.014855629,0.0007048079,0.000108421846,0.000671404,0.0002598185,0.55045915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974232,0.0002269924,0.000055923156,0.00019649744,0.0009766691,0.0011207651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779034,0.00043776736,0.00008130843,0.000088849614,0.0010056797,0.0005960456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010920074,0.0005603488,0.0005731977,0.0039770645,0.024423266,0.0136758685,0.0017886262,0.0033340743,0.03899038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037527564,0.00063771737,0.00038840162,0.012635278,0.009043411,0.0026449012,0.0021404803,0.00493963,0.0023713673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023965782,0.000021898122,0.0008212283,0.00020031829,0.0000090665835,0.00025621126,0.0056984345,0.00035962358,0.00013617973,0.75440365,0.20065485,0.037414663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005843986,0.0000047667213,0.0037204535,0.00022539192,0.000007683599,0.000048464175,0.003000738,0.00014572506,0.000090432535,0.0106189875,0.9821062,0.000025281906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99536467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24415718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24415718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24935463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87667054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210949202","doi":"10.1017/9781108784283.005","title":"History (III): Exporting Parliamentary Public Finance","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Commonwealth; Public finance; Political science; Colonialism; Government (linguistics); Law; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.06027181376004376,"score_gpt":0.2174132720863344,"score_spread":0.15714145832629065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210949202","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0071050855,0.019112976,0.0010888481,0.007524252,0.0008768507,0.000012898885,0.000076352735,0.000036418056,0.9641663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31478658,0.02872094,0.00080794084,0.006970963,0.0017448369,0.00006372113,0.00019510064,0.0001320627,0.64657784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992341,0.00025901917,0.000032090393,0.00008526059,0.00025299395,0.00013656385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945325,0.00031029497,0.000046196237,0.000064007225,0.000083136656,0.000043117896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006473316,0.00017809206,0.00015792552,0.0009719896,0.0029193703,0.0052465554,0.00036914242,0.0011550218,0.0109413825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019975966,0.00018846005,0.00013647562,0.0016696753,0.0053145085,0.0027933111,0.0012981299,0.0031896678,0.0016068377],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004893333,0.00000610284,0.00014236271,0.00006207361,8.222554e-7,0.000065643944,0.0036272486,0.000051960236,0.00009113134,0.95095944,0.030963607,0.014024691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016991137,0.000005474595,0.00044512135,0.00014039705,0.0000010557626,0.000082456965,0.000666039,0.000037124748,0.0001358695,0.016911797,0.9815701,0.00000280825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021201761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022568224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021201761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064823152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003203284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047032714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211093583","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4030006","title":"Women’s Charter Equality at the Supreme Court of Canada: Surprising Losses or Anticipated Failures?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.031481049991932485,"score_gpt":0.28474213990046515,"score_spread":0.2532610899085327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211093583","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17374396,0.0044548213,0.001341727,0.53546697,0.0019734509,0.000110726905,0.0007938257,0.00007550558,0.28203902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9157341,0.00092934107,0.00053221703,0.03423743,0.0004042117,0.000031923915,0.000101436584,0.000060563732,0.047968734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9701301,0.0028714067,0.00036223215,0.0019400758,0.009171369,0.015524854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96944404,0.0056426437,0.0011344934,0.001004441,0.01223998,0.01053432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01610623,0.00037395707,0.0010862403,0.001751969,0.03422131,0.018476177,0.0044635,0.010579604,0.015293861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0585347,0.0005276758,0.0005238645,0.0031783262,0.015354502,0.0058337213,0.0052844915,0.014557069,0.00081180834],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019268204,0.000095803334,0.013426986,0.00008252473,0.00010730754,0.000493925,0.017298143,0.0010156754,0.00034695104,0.6948234,0.23017299,0.0419436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017756519,0.00012050763,0.07326787,0.00075684744,0.00023727267,0.00019595405,0.061679848,0.002647982,0.0022861778,0.15867572,0.6995292,0.00042516962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9806121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99267465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12376986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12376986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29654738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89801735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211209076","doi":"10.7202/1085795ar","title":"Tracer la frontière entre la preuve du contexte législatif et social et la plaidoirie : proposition d’un cadre d’analyse pour l’application de la prohibition de l’expertise sur le droit dans le contentieux constitutionnel","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012555356694227958,"score_gpt":0.2510519063834525,"score_spread":0.2384965496892245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211209076","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2954214,0.003996654,0.0751156,0.020859374,0.00015601519,0.00014772547,0.00016254467,0.00007351456,0.6040671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849961,0.00056407956,0.0036487018,0.0004098142,0.000027825352,0.000065173575,0.000023872299,0.000017242752,0.010247139],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99597067,0.0019237356,0.000114617134,0.00066806027,0.000670301,0.00065263576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910362,0.0061677448,0.0007888812,0.00062338635,0.0009137286,0.00047015792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004214089,0.00033844777,0.0004399002,0.0015866222,0.004461366,0.007985164,0.0009963433,0.0025181416,0.016761402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00934171,0.00032273328,0.00050934847,0.0012649815,0.020586325,0.007780904,0.00586768,0.0027352504,0.00089842547],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001877007,0.000026265903,0.0021866243,0.0000776493,0.00000832769,0.00020238974,0.025201963,0.0004575762,0.00041334936,0.960987,0.0005754448,0.009844733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004296181,0.00013849526,0.024327658,0.00096332637,0.00005164491,0.00051339343,0.098901406,0.0035936595,0.0017384341,0.74141514,0.1282276,0.00008635873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013013618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015219013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016761402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058373865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006787164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056072414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211254543","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004550","title":"Nonconstitutional Amendments","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Democracy; Political science; Constitutional economics; Liberal democracy; Law; Constitutional amendment; Democratic legitimacy; Sovereignty; Phenomenon; Constitutional law; Constitutional review; Law and economics; Constitution; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.029800279208614836,"score_gpt":0.313601402395157,"score_spread":0.28380112318654216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211254543","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01603678,0.0015167368,0.039097752,0.0056246757,0.0011341545,0.00015621432,0.0002936537,0.00019681874,0.9359432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8497191,0.00120404,0.017017733,0.0037773822,0.0013653492,0.0005894962,0.00034189603,0.000160734,0.12582423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9766128,0.009113403,0.0018084496,0.0047102654,0.0057888823,0.001966081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98084795,0.009142908,0.0011342741,0.0062462026,0.0023269,0.00030173568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01394083,0.0005289362,0.00075723167,0.0014990852,0.0061188564,0.0065244366,0.0022441829,0.003236085,0.01674069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023219246,0.00051355985,0.0008829117,0.0016329451,0.020594552,0.0068595503,0.005463641,0.006243158,0.0034707547],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021092226,0.0000030283777,0.000025614558,0.00000785479,0.0000015602392,0.000010019036,0.0001848714,0.000021090165,0.000054680255,0.9976386,0.0005643948,0.0014863188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026478103,0.000024073457,0.0003032039,0.00006326472,0.00001340732,0.000095817304,0.00022788846,0.00038511693,0.00076263957,0.8198817,0.17819928,0.000017235381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021960845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003795258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9978039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033884628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042190724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07372701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213326079","doi":"10.1093/icon/moab127","title":"Judicial amendment of the constitution","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Interpretation (philosophy); Judicial interpretation; Constitutional amendment; Law; Political science; Judicial activism; Judicial review; Context (archaeology); Politics; Original intent; Extant taxon; Originalism; Invocation; Constitutional law; Amendment; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02444199024478361,"score_gpt":0.31829335709583545,"score_spread":0.29385136685105184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213326079","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029501095,0.0019900675,0.010775675,0.01624228,0.00078249344,0.0001316079,0.000101248224,0.000055060827,0.9404204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9479286,0.0007347145,0.0029760976,0.0041548107,0.00037604093,0.00009859228,0.000072619914,0.000032860848,0.04362559],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.976254,0.008611726,0.0008073123,0.0022659358,0.0077744494,0.004286524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98664063,0.007030041,0.0007438329,0.0019175305,0.0033267264,0.00034136232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01244688,0.00033464303,0.00063986186,0.0019744385,0.0088114,0.010683214,0.0022816567,0.0062249103,0.0049787676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027489232,0.0003757766,0.0006663377,0.0016730258,0.033124633,0.0032603678,0.0035172445,0.009829224,0.00073298655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021553433,0.000002273164,0.00008654352,0.00000598916,0.000001054061,0.000037119247,0.0006152771,0.000066798646,0.00003754437,0.9972621,0.0010198059,0.000863283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003783503,0.00004512874,0.0018345246,0.00050594215,0.00003732583,0.00020475773,0.0027916124,0.0014157529,0.0011073663,0.6708132,0.32114115,0.00006543589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05084603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05678328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05084603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015661282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02348571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11363113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214664901","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199264063.003.0014","title":"Judicial Review, Legislative Override, and Democracy","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Charter; Political science; Enforcement; Democracy; Law; Law and economics; Judicial review; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03563413281104954,"score_gpt":0.29984116942644423,"score_spread":0.2642070366153947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214664901","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03162667,0.041801248,0.004913236,0.076278515,0.00088309724,0.000033390857,0.00005182598,0.000031146323,0.8443809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9157495,0.011354288,0.0011158887,0.012696237,0.0015250937,0.00005016739,0.00003421047,0.000029201577,0.057445414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98699874,0.007170853,0.00022539358,0.0008962545,0.003701476,0.0010072719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9831839,0.0117367245,0.0012261344,0.00074603216,0.0027980506,0.00030923047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010306165,0.00015080406,0.00044919897,0.0014705565,0.0033646917,0.0056903595,0.0009063144,0.0024249454,0.0047245314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017922422,0.00017081968,0.00020167915,0.0017923887,0.01258422,0.0025659085,0.0017663327,0.0029697616,0.00048221316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040401806,0.000007858011,0.00012830873,0.000020047179,0.0000020110951,0.000030023946,0.00069303904,0.00013057364,0.000039681076,0.9866073,0.0071862508,0.0051508355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030005505,0.000024489125,0.0014703505,0.00034018225,0.000013536941,0.000074806274,0.0013547837,0.00066450087,0.00039091308,0.7394915,0.25612783,0.000016996706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014867232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018032433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014867232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007581875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010724256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055010617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220711391","doi":"10.4324/9781003264262","title":"Constitutional Law and Precedent","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Universitetet i Oslo; European Commission","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.03092989175448381,"score_gpt":0.2873765030518673,"score_spread":0.2564466112973835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220711391","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015388351,0.02199955,0.0040471093,0.009597192,0.0006188706,0.00003558957,0.00008747343,0.000027105862,0.9620483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42298162,0.044767648,0.007834619,0.010523115,0.0031487064,0.00025538704,0.0005020587,0.00010370115,0.5098831],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99761117,0.0009464825,0.000076008975,0.0002791377,0.00083042844,0.00025681008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986078,0.0008894392,0.00007098037,0.00015024381,0.00020633324,0.00007532209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019836363,0.00038045208,0.00045347653,0.0012802717,0.004788029,0.006949545,0.0009048932,0.002134691,0.01660736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044493703,0.00028327963,0.00023431894,0.0022526423,0.016205844,0.005922299,0.0021774399,0.0038295481,0.0023871502],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.777182e-7,0.0000013568218,0.000010879286,0.000011554992,3.4052528e-7,0.000009637502,0.00019288373,0.000047001813,0.000009566927,0.9932916,0.0043089455,0.0021157193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003171356,0.0000043807304,0.000097242715,0.00012141183,0.0000012632046,0.000028639899,0.00030065968,0.00008229383,0.000025113497,0.67882425,0.32050845,0.0000031231862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009914929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009624898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01660736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076453784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066076326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05555719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221053423","doi":"10.1111/phc3.12820","title":"Federalism: Contemporary political philosophy issues","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Politics; Doctrine; New Federalism; Political science; Political philosophy; Scrutiny; Democracy; Sociology; Law and economics; Subsidiarity; Normative; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Economics; European union","score_opus":0.10746257646545411,"score_gpt":0.3375189679486287,"score_spread":0.23005639148317458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221053423","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01805411,0.13273503,0.025721114,0.55450106,0.0019311847,0.000026470403,0.00008139799,0.00006435784,0.26688522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87882495,0.059105456,0.006615267,0.032595675,0.008101358,0.000105306215,0.000054844557,0.000075219206,0.014521852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99597967,0.0023391128,0.00010078389,0.00041498514,0.0008208071,0.00034467975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952297,0.003714187,0.00021475073,0.00020585775,0.00041808683,0.00021745297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067797424,0.000254667,0.0006451956,0.0030379768,0.005250178,0.0069415793,0.0010230342,0.0057093794,0.0049310527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048213545,0.0002909775,0.00058748556,0.003052864,0.031277902,0.008017688,0.002382557,0.007912492,0.00048559142],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.6030764e-7,0.0000029740524,0.000027233811,0.000011791168,9.608029e-7,0.000006628788,0.00026981693,0.0000604954,0.00001175061,0.99707556,0.001233629,0.0012982376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002543607,0.0000028362867,0.00010685762,0.00007870708,0.0000015892474,0.000016207201,0.00028280326,0.00026001383,0.000020103109,0.96803075,0.031194868,0.000002699771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053050695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037355868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009923091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009923091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004214405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071997344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224004484","doi":"10.29173/psur255","title":"Canadian Constitution Needs to Be Amended for Canada to Fully Embrace Multiculturalism","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Undergraduate Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Multiculturalism; Neuroscience of multilingualism; Constitution; Charter; Political science; State (computer science); Hierarchy; Law; Perspective (graphical); Indigenous; Position (finance); Sociology; Law and economics; Linguistics; Business; Philosophy","score_opus":0.047314042297106805,"score_gpt":0.33762287653963174,"score_spread":0.29030883424252496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224004484","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015872318,0.02465992,0.002530606,0.5070307,0.008932267,0.0005737071,0.0037891131,0.00046931347,0.4361421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2612121,0.02357049,0.016460523,0.37194225,0.0015514581,0.00057254074,0.002690299,0.00024935193,0.32175097],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874615,0.0008908226,0.00045895757,0.00067367946,0.00702193,0.0034930606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9685102,0.0038343966,0.0005820567,0.0011342528,0.022788474,0.0031505832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007894352,0.00043738715,0.00092613505,0.002693781,0.015997922,0.012349254,0.0031906944,0.007952366,0.007742206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02086564,0.0006099877,0.0013698133,0.0035909074,0.005265613,0.0026759354,0.0021016602,0.009537122,0.0009291747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034833654,0.00003942648,0.0017626722,0.00028744814,0.000040369076,0.00028503622,0.002135004,0.0005387952,0.0005028262,0.4236536,0.5388089,0.031911068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031005107,0.00001144527,0.0037954212,0.00031084288,0.00003703394,0.000042882883,0.00088073994,0.00018090458,0.00016216707,0.007193558,0.98728,0.00007399039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99258983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11515289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11515289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.49129486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8354966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224591790","doi":"10.1017/cls.2021.28","title":"Public Support for Canadian Courts: Understanding the Roles of Institutional Trust and Partisanship","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; Western University; Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Political science; Public support; Supreme court; Politics; Government (linguistics); Public opinion; Law; Period (music); Public administration; Prime minister","score_opus":0.0683199592203731,"score_gpt":0.27430617837812965,"score_spread":0.20598621915775656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224591790","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95273656,0.00046417143,0.000185863,0.0058399984,0.00001849493,0.000028998405,0.00070962065,0.000007781218,0.040008493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991511,0.00012404715,0.000035598685,0.00006354333,0.0000050498966,0.000004026275,0.00010579135,0.0000017870985,0.0005090489],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965385,0.000403836,0.000100105135,0.00021702785,0.0016062804,0.0011342971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9752098,0.0059875236,0.006375269,0.0007571837,0.0070384443,0.004631775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034280806,0.00016839453,0.00032620682,0.0047834595,0.006808622,0.005952697,0.0010997237,0.0006433872,0.0069428184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02257954,0.00016910057,0.00027383288,0.0055591674,0.0035559896,0.001572609,0.0022755761,0.0012959649,0.00016124586],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008290163,0.00010356866,0.9081845,0.00007185001,0.00008254426,0.00024131585,0.0359055,0.00058480614,0.00016716018,0.020352218,0.006486009,0.027737545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007990339,0.000015597281,0.9482773,0.00011509267,0.00003477827,0.000029979197,0.04035516,0.0007427081,0.00006765246,0.0011902003,0.009134777,0.000028755256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98352605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99004513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94277024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057229772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05628333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41523302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225257895","doi":"10.5944/rdp.113.2022.33579","title":"Poder Judicial como un (muy) mal regulador político: notas desde Brasil","year":2022,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Derecho Político","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.021252389130125494,"score_gpt":0.30454394146890046,"score_spread":0.28329155233877495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225257895","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39532518,0.007348536,0.0030467447,0.032145962,0.00022444397,0.000045550314,0.0001380219,0.000022824548,0.5617027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98544544,0.0013041546,0.00031449433,0.00048699713,0.000024011742,0.000006325121,0.000018141047,0.0000060400216,0.012394484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974987,0.000988151,0.00007452687,0.0003754676,0.0005895381,0.00047361635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977825,0.0008788422,0.00029493528,0.00026293178,0.00049003697,0.00029071633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020793946,0.00015112406,0.00027125573,0.0013640112,0.0072245575,0.005365805,0.00041528823,0.00088341034,0.004388137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052728965,0.00013741935,0.0001438353,0.001966537,0.011122852,0.0017148334,0.0015339836,0.0012604119,0.00020193931],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001666133,0.000010468,0.005000542,0.00005884038,0.00000481116,0.00014493703,0.016466718,0.00016207722,0.0002460759,0.9566745,0.0039206627,0.017293736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026100788,0.000060200568,0.11302006,0.00083056936,0.00007511355,0.00041640602,0.09408738,0.0016487995,0.0009918767,0.21652506,0.57226443,0.000054051874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19422664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4071234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19422664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009854652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008675211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3861922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230268328","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198861973.003.0013","title":"What’s Wrong with (Some) Human Rights Lawyers?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.040004054918333,"score_gpt":0.27608636065658076,"score_spread":0.23608230573824776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230268328","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020516028,0.0040309983,0.00018176991,0.9848489,0.0016725479,0.0000039689176,0.000006003595,0.000009933016,0.0071943486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12654042,0.009384285,0.0006987672,0.8405316,0.005926411,0.000035241108,0.000019963838,0.00007601277,0.01678721],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9803678,0.011057936,0.0006099418,0.0015094772,0.0031963876,0.0032584704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95419765,0.029684715,0.0023242102,0.0009459681,0.007625882,0.0052215746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024800489,0.00032841985,0.0006375214,0.0013648174,0.019830856,0.023595508,0.0019293921,0.019658266,0.007350905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056075156,0.0005682167,0.00055096153,0.0017655543,0.030484151,0.021374254,0.0030877832,0.025942376,0.0019597765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058569563,0.00010625481,0.0021368305,0.00028232252,0.000032596075,0.00060667936,0.0705312,0.00010571467,0.00038500948,0.28690177,0.59230596,0.046547074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004318165,0.00007273105,0.0018057445,0.0016491939,0.000025386298,0.00045577518,0.12161247,0.00021367184,0.0004825503,0.15090767,0.72260106,0.00013048113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02242969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0254247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024800489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010485282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0100071905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13115913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230448376","doi":"10.25071/1920-7336.26034","title":"Thamotharem and Guideline 7 of the IRB: Rethinking the Scope of the Fettering of Discretion Doctrine","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Refuge Canada s Journal on Refuge","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Guideline; Discretion; Argument (complex analysis); Refugee; Consistency (knowledge bases); Political science; Scope (computer science); Law; Autonomy; Independence (probability theory); Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.02308554365463313,"score_gpt":0.25989629341360587,"score_spread":0.23681074975897273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230448376","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04164418,0.006452136,0.08225503,0.61695915,0.00692165,0.00058229524,0.00013307607,0.00033678574,0.24471572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4957788,0.0026998473,0.09284234,0.3784754,0.003135002,0.0011577422,0.000113116956,0.00028231772,0.025515538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.844289,0.0921036,0.015877916,0.009341238,0.030952346,0.0074359486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80606544,0.15482314,0.006041159,0.009475904,0.02056975,0.0030246251],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.107630834,0.00061731826,0.0014193206,0.003056391,0.010178,0.017722921,0.0053707035,0.040487003,0.0015906268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15499121,0.0014146348,0.0021284767,0.0018188693,0.047616858,0.010370099,0.009562017,0.04224822,0.000779036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022259619,0.000027149244,0.00043765837,0.000108951965,0.000022173788,0.00037374545,0.014533594,0.00031132685,0.0007109142,0.94713306,0.02636868,0.0099506145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017016819,0.00022060436,0.002595521,0.0026252775,0.00014145173,0.0007137989,0.016973678,0.0022139354,0.0026834812,0.5850275,0.3862055,0.0004290866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037133425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048432186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96286654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011051999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036066663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56921303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231274499","doi":"10.22215/etd/2007-06275","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada: reaffirming the norm through the veil of constitutional neutrality","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Neutrality; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Norm (philosophy); Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03416628275344943,"score_gpt":0.3253725926709973,"score_spread":0.29120630991754787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231274499","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07721793,0.0074732597,0.0048332834,0.3075899,0.0013270061,0.00006796211,0.00029646183,0.000074570984,0.60111964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9442586,0.0021302104,0.0015335556,0.019223744,0.00033498087,0.000035545567,0.000061371094,0.00006985264,0.032352097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9829291,0.0037614065,0.00032948886,0.0016129214,0.00704172,0.00432537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97670424,0.00800545,0.0007729331,0.0013757724,0.010565309,0.0025763947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015976295,0.0003148273,0.00066061434,0.0021011783,0.025457233,0.018501682,0.0032225363,0.007872688,0.005608475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048655223,0.0003611861,0.00026336886,0.0029912228,0.04000337,0.0071236338,0.0053231237,0.010530592,0.00045366352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014626647,0.000005295799,0.0007348339,0.000019353889,0.00000410948,0.000035088375,0.0035583775,0.00014839855,0.0000649138,0.9719325,0.016747814,0.006734748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009535685,0.000028269296,0.009866511,0.0007458683,0.000097601696,0.000054259945,0.01831565,0.0019166676,0.0008713559,0.54332966,0.42455196,0.00012685257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97197837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9820063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11363392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11363392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3156514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82447565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231389143","doi":"10.5040/9781509947201","title":"The Constitution of Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Democracy; Federalism; Ideal (ethics); Context (archaeology); Political science; Indigenous; Law; CLARITY; Simplicity; Government (linguistics); Human rights; Constitutional law; Rule of law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Epistemology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024564448543977994,"score_gpt":0.23767656626675665,"score_spread":0.21311211772277866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231389143","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027301556,0.0097641535,0.0005598559,0.014487868,0.00083708204,0.000040252842,0.0010220807,0.00007014913,0.9704884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17425458,0.011640431,0.0018024497,0.007938907,0.00031441305,0.00010556482,0.0009726835,0.0001816135,0.8027894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997531,0.00017698653,0.000039165032,0.00024014404,0.0013086343,0.00070414314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901974,0.00009331265,0.000022457638,0.00006000423,0.0006508958,0.00015362093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077548117,0.00045179873,0.00032981642,0.0017701557,0.016348891,0.009336306,0.0010928415,0.0019870526,0.016649855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002845873,0.0003147712,0.00025487127,0.0031647647,0.007082422,0.0017249921,0.0016556004,0.0028392475,0.0018730109],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004442724,0.0000026901648,0.00017216906,0.00003598172,0.000002235346,0.000050462557,0.0014924596,0.00011992912,0.00006585451,0.83474493,0.15199,0.011318951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022585523,0.0000013548994,0.00068928086,0.00007656284,0.0000030366011,0.000024465728,0.0006973032,0.00006937039,0.000048882088,0.013361575,0.9850161,0.000009911347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9889712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99314237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.117635496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.117635496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17145562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85350925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231518129","doi":"10.4000/cal.7992","title":"Luís R. Cardoso de Oliveira, Droit légal et insulte morale. Dilemmes de la citoyenneté au Brésil, au Québec et aux États-Unis","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers des Amériques latines","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.021691957423671675,"score_gpt":0.3138811932197139,"score_spread":0.2921892357960422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231518129","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0111803105,0.21840471,0.0012791058,0.6403708,0.0034961787,0.000039356568,0.0003654625,0.000047785998,0.124816366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44243115,0.21434824,0.0027166842,0.105156526,0.0035893044,0.00015216743,0.00024326332,0.00014821782,0.23121446],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998596,0.00061734376,0.00003603804,0.00018924805,0.00040991104,0.0001514789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99757993,0.0013374151,0.00021739952,0.000107680105,0.0005735208,0.00018394939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020473795,0.00063413335,0.0002886557,0.0013082686,0.0076540797,0.0053379494,0.0009147902,0.0030723729,0.0065153316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047238157,0.00033530185,0.00021590371,0.0015568112,0.006744814,0.0041942997,0.0013135249,0.0042062146,0.0010833757],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031145762,0.000030336485,0.0017998199,0.00020065397,0.000011395456,0.00015550012,0.015988072,0.0000889351,0.00021934303,0.4403439,0.5148397,0.026291128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013417493,0.000013954753,0.009169586,0.0007129097,0.00001288191,0.00014493533,0.012510529,0.00013042233,0.0004092678,0.04503432,0.93180656,0.000041290652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35707036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.56980497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6429297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009556569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008220467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70998394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231860877","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190682910.001.0001","title":"Extending Rights' Reach","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Political science; Jurisprudence; Fundamental rights; Law; Normative; Reservation of rights; Constitutional law; Human rights; Law and economics; Politics; Democracy; Right to property; Sociology","score_opus":0.03373768345462289,"score_gpt":0.2520294103406219,"score_spread":0.218291726885999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231860877","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015298632,0.003459945,0.0057491953,0.0045656865,0.00030978848,0.00002131484,0.000039946965,0.000047007125,0.98427725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.343964,0.01193234,0.007999222,0.0068318797,0.0013332437,0.00023623553,0.00016561072,0.0002367098,0.6273006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969572,0.0008117398,0.00008626133,0.00049430574,0.0011429858,0.0005075547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99806374,0.0009900397,0.00007536294,0.00043266875,0.00028310914,0.00015522572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028316155,0.0005804376,0.00055799144,0.0016260295,0.0040106666,0.008493933,0.0012040868,0.0032440927,0.025866779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057039596,0.00037816176,0.0006571822,0.0011627233,0.015282757,0.011589482,0.009380867,0.0047906656,0.005453463],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023349191,0.0000024189876,0.000024677178,0.000016157395,0.0000012272575,0.000020233583,0.0009960588,0.000059915666,0.000046582423,0.9857778,0.005009881,0.008042743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061951814,0.00000964272,0.000120801385,0.00014844038,0.0000042887073,0.00007839314,0.00053229387,0.00011221796,0.000086132204,0.37944642,0.61944824,0.000006891906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005007083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056799497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025866779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004681978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035635638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08653301},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232052430","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2776802","title":"Proportionality and Absolute Rights","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Proportionality (law); Computer science; Internet privacy; Political science; World Wide Web; Computer security; Law","score_opus":0.012972696457804014,"score_gpt":0.27573531814226365,"score_spread":0.26276262168445963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232052430","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0406119,0.002789768,0.06331091,0.014692901,0.00075585704,0.000086276516,0.00025467307,0.00010129412,0.8773964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90501195,0.0010095278,0.008478651,0.0022285935,0.00097092247,0.00022504495,0.00011438042,0.00009985861,0.081861086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905654,0.0035259114,0.00053049834,0.0023270627,0.002033866,0.0010171877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904727,0.0051200795,0.00069932675,0.0022551739,0.0010461315,0.00040665717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008267507,0.0006111635,0.001086722,0.002355296,0.0049300464,0.007204271,0.001754556,0.0035198545,0.027489694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02466873,0.0006565299,0.0009932498,0.0024216648,0.023323577,0.017929388,0.0055462783,0.007260454,0.0023212966],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021409267,0.0000024665378,0.000020818514,0.0000038205403,0.000001447237,0.0000033017889,0.00006494618,0.000027056225,0.000013689398,0.9987343,0.00029506578,0.0008308847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036617469,0.000002125756,0.00004280483,0.000004595212,0.0000020996063,0.000012989338,0.000027825517,0.000061698534,0.000029730398,0.99669844,0.0031121138,0.0000019243948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020641328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015793354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027489694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024442552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021793158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09196216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232172700","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.555","title":"THE PARADOX OF RULE OF LAW REFORMS: HOW EARLY REFORMS CAN CREATE OBSTACLES TO FUTURE ONES","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rule of law; Politics; Law reform; Face (sociological concept); Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Path dependence; Political economy; Sociology; Economics; Social science; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.010629426809805146,"score_gpt":0.22601544636713128,"score_spread":0.21538601955732614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232172700","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08878682,0.0101423655,0.04690272,0.56524444,0.0016963783,0.0002955788,0.00015376425,0.00019870327,0.28657922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9395857,0.0029154704,0.0104398895,0.031260695,0.0006809659,0.0002813832,0.000058482736,0.00016678813,0.014610608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9437716,0.029725803,0.0019024007,0.00505177,0.012436369,0.007112139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9043901,0.06191923,0.0071495757,0.008903946,0.011685581,0.005951566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06452168,0.0005368694,0.0013965593,0.002580941,0.016229253,0.020711666,0.0034384616,0.012523031,0.004149872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.123015545,0.0007612819,0.0011101,0.002534717,0.048393615,0.025181873,0.012208862,0.023534106,0.0007613313],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020359927,0.000041267147,0.000651218,0.000060131537,0.000011997852,0.00017168478,0.0072112205,0.00042469442,0.00013170045,0.9801412,0.0043231007,0.006811438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008233208,0.00008691516,0.0020650225,0.00029891924,0.000022586824,0.00016689627,0.008935713,0.0011535464,0.0006103514,0.8622926,0.12420429,0.00008076759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017771415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017902792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06452168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02014261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027946185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34122735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232711572","doi":"10.4324/9781315184555-21","title":"Law, Convention, Prerogative: Reflections Prompted by the Canadian Constitutional Case","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Convention; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.05836138516896253,"score_gpt":0.3227974918024485,"score_spread":0.26443610663348593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232711572","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03406484,0.023546332,0.0010147622,0.3250224,0.0020351014,0.00006137426,0.00023946184,0.00005159647,0.613964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71402425,0.017583752,0.0016305107,0.07432273,0.0014386481,0.00011479675,0.00017338488,0.00016477061,0.19054714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925183,0.0013624153,0.00012681818,0.00056434417,0.0028759055,0.0025521547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99353856,0.0039019927,0.0001701522,0.00018021205,0.0014394508,0.00076957187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067527215,0.0005068726,0.00064229604,0.0032043317,0.049099643,0.01934509,0.003557592,0.011853394,0.007161591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012243218,0.00064984686,0.0006186524,0.0076483306,0.054569233,0.006823606,0.004210585,0.013994583,0.0005888136],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010463726,0.000010485333,0.0001578541,0.000029367942,0.0000019198908,0.00033374684,0.020673525,0.00013835935,0.00009727215,0.9267579,0.047756862,0.004032322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029670822,0.0000084590865,0.001842581,0.0002589526,0.000013837298,0.00016029617,0.048592556,0.0004040058,0.00021692747,0.10935536,0.83903986,0.000077455785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9872499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9934875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24886577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24886577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17121963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87120926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233044663","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.1.41","title":"DEFERENCE, DEFIANCE, AND DOCTRINE: DEFINING THE LIMITS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Political science; Judicial review; Law; Statute; Standard of review; Doctrine; Legitimacy; Law and economics; Judicial deference; Substantive due process; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Separation of powers; Legislature; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.01872079232334788,"score_gpt":0.26243890550361487,"score_spread":0.24371811318026698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233044663","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05860707,0.087382406,0.12577802,0.079798706,0.001237503,0.00031926885,0.00017655863,0.00018712584,0.6465134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94350994,0.008843266,0.020575576,0.007144206,0.0017150902,0.00033028662,0.000065063716,0.00008545136,0.017731076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9605327,0.018705342,0.002991993,0.0034955216,0.01137985,0.0028945124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92213476,0.05479332,0.004457757,0.0066625807,0.009185878,0.0027657629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04086169,0.00032865506,0.0010652087,0.004345259,0.004357731,0.018019365,0.00260039,0.007880401,0.0020845116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.094870254,0.0006710725,0.00050201884,0.0018045314,0.042313296,0.012775319,0.006199467,0.0066044875,0.0005345685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003878371,0.000003657206,0.00015304543,0.000012854864,0.0000015503892,0.000025347574,0.00053226744,0.00013245408,0.000060329545,0.9942821,0.0009775391,0.0038149324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000140733555,0.000020382411,0.00042246009,0.00022341924,0.0000059375625,0.0000892222,0.00046979327,0.0007466919,0.00014506548,0.9565376,0.04129941,0.000025910127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010376992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010692527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04086169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011411656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012664067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2160998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234308802","doi":"10.3138/9781487513078-010","title":"8. The Impact of Value Change in the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Value (mathematics); Law; Political science; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04862266160747398,"score_gpt":0.2639433514920475,"score_spread":0.21532068988457354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234308802","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018426238,0.012332394,0.0005914146,0.052292682,0.00064750767,0.000038442355,0.00040289355,0.00002494559,0.91524345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58965904,0.0076128473,0.0006766429,0.018970303,0.0005184458,0.00005434405,0.00015341905,0.00007885377,0.38227606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950505,0.0005774354,0.000070703376,0.0003587249,0.0019194433,0.0020230957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969874,0.00095556956,0.00009633338,0.000104375,0.0014553656,0.00040092808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020405564,0.00049242005,0.0005009417,0.001750806,0.022714132,0.013843741,0.0018075712,0.009448501,0.017499782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007612815,0.00040162494,0.00049458956,0.0029611601,0.010153044,0.0025119937,0.001989186,0.0064936075,0.0009374258],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013547856,0.000011240225,0.0005181635,0.000029125911,0.0000090278645,0.00010587009,0.002198771,0.00027687446,0.00007036788,0.9260206,0.064515434,0.0062308847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043294836,0.000022709386,0.009215907,0.00052245264,0.00008311566,0.000077560355,0.006210409,0.00079520786,0.00051968644,0.22015914,0.7622666,0.000084088424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98301363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99493825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.111605585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.111605585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15268755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80975896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234326012","doi":"10.1332/policypress/9781529200621.003.0003","title":"Towards a Written Constitution","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Policy Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Statute; Law; Political science; CITES","score_opus":0.09530761414240706,"score_gpt":0.3286729689085661,"score_spread":0.23336535476615905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234326012","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036037294,0.009591057,0.045304663,0.1579535,0.005986478,0.00014172554,0.00019978365,0.00016770913,0.7770513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20366682,0.017148135,0.07642634,0.06677956,0.005128489,0.00084737287,0.00084145274,0.0007510164,0.6284108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916162,0.0038864866,0.00036050027,0.00087320025,0.002709878,0.00055377797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914192,0.003975834,0.00036938672,0.0013188812,0.0022428518,0.0006739765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011417822,0.000509558,0.00053692545,0.0018384798,0.0057594,0.012249512,0.0015722151,0.0043067816,0.016188474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01801237,0.0004196009,0.00047878787,0.0014357544,0.019383062,0.013023622,0.005462061,0.013026222,0.004818123],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.4886303e-7,0.000003268295,0.000012707543,0.0000115803505,3.5933917e-7,0.000009502046,0.0006928796,0.000034746237,0.00002118551,0.9879903,0.008687931,0.0025345583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004847247,0.000005682153,0.000079179634,0.0002117666,0.0000014433901,0.000032227803,0.00095016643,0.00013216033,0.000069392925,0.29806462,0.70044196,0.0000066760786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012341725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012491299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016188474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01045045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01482196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075823724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235004248","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511618246","title":"The Constitution of Law","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":250,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Constitution; Law; Political science; Legislature; Rule of law; Common law; Politics","score_opus":0.024730415088551644,"score_gpt":0.22784518936072307,"score_spread":0.20311477427217142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235004248","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028240692,0.012277058,0.009794338,0.018432682,0.00080316205,0.000056987054,0.00013224865,0.0000544291,0.9556251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5527553,0.019862747,0.013417684,0.01590572,0.0019366744,0.00058821996,0.00035484578,0.00018985737,0.394989],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99620396,0.0015283226,0.00015713432,0.00060704525,0.0010061417,0.0004974178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982759,0.000988122,0.00010938295,0.00027331803,0.00024375293,0.00010963516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038997685,0.00038837382,0.00047930542,0.0014557004,0.004917216,0.009205329,0.0007765168,0.003637998,0.007204305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006380465,0.00039901485,0.00027552096,0.0012140081,0.029108256,0.007513575,0.0032070791,0.00610877,0.0017616937],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.1129293e-7,0.000001155727,0.000010436588,0.0000040551863,3.4212033e-7,0.0000042695015,0.00027852185,0.00002655803,0.000012735866,0.9965197,0.0019792856,0.0011623771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053319523,0.000005849585,0.00011445186,0.00011611062,0.0000017417522,0.000027228392,0.0003931406,0.00010072503,0.000062631836,0.656012,0.34315476,0.0000059553295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008961623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006078153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009205329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064317062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00860008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04666555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235365193","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511994760.014","title":"CANADA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.03581690914882618,"score_gpt":0.2011748571998509,"score_spread":0.16535794805102472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235365193","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00053910364,0.00443683,0.00029558336,0.0029740334,0.00061928196,0.000023946033,0.001943267,0.00019630698,0.98897165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024860522,0.0019839664,0.00029737412,0.00078404753,0.000044380482,0.000009375527,0.00060194806,0.00007088492,0.9937219],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952245,0.000018679617,0.0000132394025,0.00012583041,0.00022482281,0.0000949738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951065,0.000039402283,0.000016773878,0.00002946275,0.00030795837,0.00009568553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021909752,0.0006623981,0.00045174945,0.0014008878,0.005890834,0.0047215815,0.0010386786,0.002326787,0.5122284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007335705,0.000366732,0.00037098577,0.0028897664,0.0010126889,0.0019749103,0.0014540995,0.0016983722,0.17815521],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034469365,0.000017317085,0.00040395375,0.00025571193,0.000005839839,0.00034062896,0.0003805093,0.00012253852,0.00044062806,0.09442478,0.7813322,0.12224151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019477147,0.0000017325962,0.00019961962,0.00004091843,0.0000011615948,0.000046671255,0.00007883218,0.000020367628,0.000052641513,0.0011599218,0.998393,0.0000032378448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6308662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85460746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5122284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017573953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016435314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235533457","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226474.003.0008","title":"7 Conclusions","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legalism (Western philosophy); Law; Judicial discretion; Discretion; Political science; Rule of law; Ideology; Democracy; Legal formalism; Sociology; Public law; Judicial review; Politics; Black letter law; Private law","score_opus":0.03658649568496556,"score_gpt":0.2598197432002938,"score_spread":0.22323324751532822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235533457","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027560645,0.0033238158,0.005119628,0.051242325,0.0057516964,0.00015970643,0.0020554888,0.00037870978,0.9292126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.067117676,0.0069862176,0.010314908,0.044921614,0.002423005,0.0003493828,0.0046630627,0.0006873621,0.86253685],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99751616,0.00045159005,0.00010043237,0.000485534,0.0008497123,0.00059651176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99665004,0.00051654625,0.00013205089,0.00039461575,0.001801461,0.00050533895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028084887,0.00070128596,0.0004820771,0.0016843284,0.0033143123,0.008268966,0.0020921275,0.003906582,0.23601799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009548561,0.00024825518,0.0010890379,0.0014573496,0.0015466845,0.0050666737,0.0040204325,0.0035643105,0.079471245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011689107,0.00007263444,0.0017536905,0.00047082224,0.000021153515,0.00022551464,0.0012636059,0.0005886684,0.000297266,0.44596353,0.45463103,0.0945952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011993624,0.000015503385,0.0011282758,0.00060164975,0.000009611017,0.0000640714,0.0012240756,0.00014880292,0.00025841861,0.041535903,0.9549909,0.000010773143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014067761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012623897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23601799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00572487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067036794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7895588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235854323","doi":"10.21991/c9kq27","title":"Introduction","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.01920544657048155,"score_gpt":0.26909396137106384,"score_spread":0.2498885148005823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235854323","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013290856,0.009257914,0.0036695076,0.07521252,0.090162255,0.00018807632,0.00762896,0.0011148814,0.8114368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008513017,0.004919369,0.0016545091,0.017656744,0.022015613,0.00015283863,0.005498456,0.0005999628,0.9389896],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980075,0.00029146485,0.00009612416,0.00046626612,0.00089197175,0.00024679114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99617225,0.0007589569,0.00021157978,0.0004081217,0.0017099247,0.00073915964],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017705365,0.00078333274,0.0005976497,0.0016135367,0.002285183,0.0070760264,0.001799884,0.003504977,0.4929369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00886152,0.00027464287,0.000570194,0.0015797429,0.0009771711,0.0042076525,0.003149973,0.0029838644,0.28850085],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021033573,0.000013680465,0.0001671751,0.000112295565,0.0000020236848,0.000030571988,0.00015755832,0.000029450379,0.00011254816,0.016521418,0.940822,0.042010207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001636078,0.000004765176,0.00014827139,0.000059117432,7.3594094e-7,0.000019787947,0.00006732392,0.000010459326,0.000024744066,0.0018808377,0.99777967,0.0000026353575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025710675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034041072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4929369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018461049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002874479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.723264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236400975","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-9991.2006.00056.x","title":"Judicial Review","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Judicial review; Legislature; Law; Rationality; Political science; Judicial activism; Judicial discretion; Adversary; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Supreme court","score_opus":0.06863262569889937,"score_gpt":0.35032927826896393,"score_spread":0.28169665257006454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236400975","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039396305,0.064251676,0.025178278,0.20000182,0.04406607,0.0017918003,0.0019414292,0.0007341652,0.658095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17570798,0.060972866,0.019447323,0.127253,0.05171101,0.0016412237,0.0026564645,0.00043560218,0.56017447],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9706406,0.00911044,0.003147436,0.0025938575,0.012798288,0.0017094867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92148626,0.018222725,0.0032842408,0.008455632,0.04566851,0.0028825991],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025384497,0.00050017587,0.0015004541,0.004161244,0.0029912659,0.0058395234,0.002746018,0.0064207003,0.03493099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09340117,0.0005292358,0.00068087195,0.0024567964,0.0032670328,0.0024038386,0.0021382244,0.006431734,0.021942327],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027699603,0.00002059459,0.0005200754,0.0004177893,0.00002971283,0.0002775917,0.00022580833,0.00015291668,0.00029883208,0.16521543,0.7462686,0.08654507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020648467,0.000018151755,0.00048688738,0.00049739657,0.0000139162785,0.00022713804,0.00008262909,0.00018075343,0.00021174016,0.023905309,0.97434074,0.000014697665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046272664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005494421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03493099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004204218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017034415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13424766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236495455","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.2.237","title":"THE EVERYDAY PROBLEM OF EMERGENCIES","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Principle of legality; Mistake; Rule of law; Politics; Law; Empirical research; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012930951744914413,"score_gpt":0.2337491872356998,"score_spread":0.2208182354907854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236495455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025967276,0.020416055,0.015764818,0.3619578,0.002806978,0.00008062719,0.00024848615,0.00007808501,0.5726798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8988488,0.012441382,0.006105875,0.024486816,0.0029260917,0.00018992762,0.00017630165,0.000104142644,0.05472071],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99095434,0.005328715,0.00047596608,0.0009936669,0.0013084731,0.0009388704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906256,0.006243636,0.00064214296,0.0008661687,0.00093470194,0.0006876687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00872705,0.000484347,0.0007128776,0.0011013561,0.014561392,0.012060362,0.00209392,0.011432159,0.006601247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022189576,0.00052437565,0.0005512788,0.001274878,0.06180754,0.017626109,0.007144385,0.011228139,0.00084123557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003955385,0.000004306427,0.00015991845,0.00003461782,0.0000028074294,0.00012118003,0.007006343,0.00011691328,0.000025473684,0.97884285,0.010927478,0.0027541297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009794035,0.000009897205,0.00036892606,0.00021422545,0.000005228249,0.0003064696,0.021799752,0.00017600326,0.000046935922,0.7380701,0.23897636,0.000016450389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01142584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012466361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014561392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008446474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007520935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061283708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237008288","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197509616.001.0001","title":"The Machinery of Government","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Business; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0216619106111287,"score_gpt":0.26067034841342057,"score_spread":0.23900843780229186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237008288","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024649994,0.004167375,0.013940229,0.012485357,0.00033983737,0.000033052846,0.00008072591,0.00011737378,0.9663712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4912746,0.0108627165,0.011877676,0.0053444593,0.0014679279,0.00043532831,0.00031019017,0.0002497657,0.4781774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844885,0.00074128277,0.00004449597,0.00024668846,0.00038794073,0.00013073317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837613,0.000791888,0.000088128385,0.00047555642,0.00021035297,0.000058007714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012018667,0.00030958818,0.00029510426,0.0010720412,0.0023056397,0.0068990835,0.00063068117,0.0012281307,0.008721626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002475431,0.00022947062,0.00027137937,0.0011646398,0.018354846,0.0050151455,0.0016870173,0.0022123705,0.0028488797],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.8723657e-7,6.904348e-7,0.000009639637,0.0000031891116,1.8915098e-7,0.0000024672565,0.000098885605,0.00006507366,0.000009032753,0.9967374,0.0019404199,0.0011323292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029716743,0.0000040426135,0.00008057954,0.000042357115,0.0000010867998,0.000010594118,0.00015930804,0.00038907072,0.00004536587,0.7589541,0.24030837,0.000002154414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006459948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038781401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008721626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00654908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049197716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04751706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237056658","doi":"10.1332/policypress/9781529200621.003.0005","title":"The Westminster Model as a Constitutional Archetype","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Policy Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Archetype; Character (mathematics); Democracy; Variety (cybernetics); Political science; Identity (music); Law; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics; Politics; Theology","score_opus":0.12008046685561369,"score_gpt":0.33977199409574405,"score_spread":0.21969152724013036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237056658","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007211837,0.006377849,0.016222417,0.0065962533,0.00024252644,0.00003645264,0.00006413949,0.00004333571,0.9632052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5749965,0.014664015,0.019188501,0.0041682185,0.0004207114,0.00034227388,0.00017763319,0.0001910233,0.38585114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795246,0.0010907552,0.000058152003,0.00025583294,0.00045497893,0.00018777067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993742,0.00032576086,0.000047401296,0.00013877766,0.000079081576,0.000034809545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018768178,0.00035745167,0.00036269083,0.0012565438,0.0030958066,0.006761523,0.000677558,0.0014912687,0.0062572407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002296821,0.00029436915,0.00018223745,0.0017856244,0.015362521,0.0065236455,0.0016346945,0.0029892484,0.0011674373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.113223e-7,9.1725275e-7,0.0000070629094,0.0000029905357,1.7177238e-7,0.0000027176343,0.0002791825,0.00003898841,0.0000097162165,0.99792457,0.00070789456,0.001025249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033175463,0.00000749238,0.00011346062,0.00008366142,0.0000022995318,0.00003246045,0.00081282074,0.00036085182,0.00014600428,0.6395609,0.3588708,0.000005929912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009117733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011476617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009117733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063981223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004505567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046421885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237089063","doi":"10.22215/etd/2014-10439","title":"The State of Democratization in Post-Soviet Russia: The Role of the European Court of Human Rights and the Growth of Rule of Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Democratization; Rule of law; Political science; Democracy; Law; Human rights; Due process; State (computer science); Law and economics; Comparative law; Sociology; Municipal law; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.00568530798845999,"score_gpt":0.2443965703933674,"score_spread":0.23871126240490742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237089063","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8782109,0.0014209488,0.000679281,0.004307561,0.000037406233,0.0000151930235,0.000021106945,0.0000063466846,0.11530127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99900573,0.0001586311,0.00004118682,0.000044374337,0.000006733869,0.0000028111074,0.000004225965,0.0000010747949,0.000735294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974866,0.0013057898,0.00010054326,0.00020318586,0.0002948234,0.0006090924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979115,0.0011543683,0.0004588847,0.00013349314,0.00018244835,0.00015934765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032563366,0.000100814024,0.0002831009,0.0013638111,0.003471979,0.007061348,0.0004546183,0.0014614251,0.0015307304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045509413,0.00015905865,0.00031000638,0.0012269428,0.010761665,0.0032126321,0.0029791244,0.0019975426,0.00012226713],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005067761,0.00007595735,0.010847702,0.000052374624,0.000019715699,0.00055807375,0.02396005,0.0009367759,0.00073100056,0.95301515,0.00069861644,0.009053923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000094973584,0.00020578621,0.26328054,0.0007803553,0.00009685193,0.001104193,0.09636894,0.005871771,0.0050928085,0.50934845,0.11765166,0.000103751896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00955809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0096247485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00955809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005413201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035103788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039275706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237458397","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198714514.003.0004","title":"3 Engaging the Constitutive Laws of Others: Necessities, Ideas, Interests","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Writ; LEAPS; Ideology; Politics; Political science; Intellectual history; Law; Comparative politics; Constitutional law; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.031677058750234334,"score_gpt":0.24972538645747158,"score_spread":0.21804832770723725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237458397","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039349813,0.0048025814,0.0055587185,0.008309794,0.00020525944,0.000017437387,0.000026112639,0.000023092547,0.977122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67078674,0.0073843976,0.0051772054,0.0059122266,0.00090163626,0.00023339053,0.00008802569,0.00014785925,0.30936855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979644,0.0011388683,0.00003843013,0.0002483991,0.00042055186,0.00018939422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990281,0.00060171715,0.00005214196,0.0001573437,0.00009905578,0.00006157568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002161352,0.00046857054,0.00035394472,0.0009936909,0.0048109805,0.010166582,0.0009210105,0.0024835344,0.0068455897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020962448,0.00026074197,0.00053284323,0.0012046851,0.035299413,0.0074383146,0.0030431296,0.0041203783,0.0010911183],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.040875e-7,0.000001803347,0.00001852591,0.0000074514487,4.3451254e-7,0.000009652055,0.001469628,0.000021585882,0.00001701037,0.9959306,0.0014251005,0.0010974241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004901234,0.000008259007,0.00017189782,0.00015738167,0.0000037685732,0.00008456175,0.0029985271,0.00014948891,0.00013918837,0.6746778,0.3215989,0.000005366136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062525254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066058454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010166582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062323636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004328071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045219183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237547815","doi":"10.1007/978-0-387-49896-6","title":"Approval Voting","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Pennsylvania State University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Voting; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.044200390645726256,"score_gpt":0.30810032221328826,"score_spread":0.263899931567562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237547815","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013957485,0.0003239802,0.009329077,0.0015094028,0.00029397043,0.000047786078,0.00010448374,0.0000735487,0.9869219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0874511,0.00036555188,0.0037918892,0.00090728136,0.00039024957,0.00013207254,0.00018052074,0.00010064236,0.9066807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977452,0.00070419826,0.00006975613,0.00039044506,0.00085658795,0.00023376913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985337,0.00056443975,0.000057973233,0.00037527323,0.00039359552,0.000074938485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018286541,0.0004546907,0.00064169645,0.0008927088,0.0024785344,0.0038109787,0.0011780608,0.001984452,0.101040065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006416245,0.0003943769,0.00052479364,0.0009161928,0.002296242,0.002732719,0.0009703985,0.0032603694,0.022508813],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012180746,0.000013793857,0.000050501276,0.000016346152,0.0000033952824,0.000013144453,0.00006626326,0.00022319086,0.000090711175,0.9231278,0.050280236,0.02610253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014982479,0.00001952612,0.00029005526,0.00003670958,0.0000083990635,0.00007329131,0.000086944,0.0016728339,0.00043227058,0.7245114,0.2728419,0.000011685549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024617878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005017266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.101040065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002149256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020745608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3380127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237813369","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv6cfpf3.4","title":"The Rule of Law in the Canadian Constitution","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Rule of law; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03792333151521577,"score_gpt":0.22821491347310258,"score_spread":0.1902915819578868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237813369","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008492904,0.0147842765,0.001275449,0.028599676,0.0006947003,0.0000403938,0.0001945101,0.00003931459,0.94587886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59952265,0.013284782,0.0022513915,0.009499169,0.0007155774,0.00007070356,0.00017741208,0.000148456,0.37432992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99597436,0.00070892804,0.00008219502,0.0004013843,0.0015277693,0.0013053603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977518,0.0008203905,0.00006417343,0.00016219466,0.00094754,0.0002539331],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028944144,0.0006125835,0.0005786979,0.0029250488,0.017933546,0.014426501,0.0017420779,0.004916668,0.010686536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008410074,0.00067259,0.00038645446,0.0047607343,0.02802721,0.0030982736,0.0016291669,0.0070175347,0.0008895154],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041711924,0.0000032147318,0.00008347581,0.000014479219,0.000001678305,0.000023116641,0.0016738918,0.00016265527,0.000027807218,0.9786081,0.015022253,0.004375124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020438716,0.0000075863213,0.0024333633,0.000294043,0.000020786989,0.00003528854,0.003001329,0.00044655293,0.0001417979,0.30519962,0.6883526,0.000046614336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9874992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.992615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1236942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1236942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1979607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8974684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238224044","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198747369.013.40","title":"Deliberative Constitutionalism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Constitutional theory; Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Political science; Polity; Constitution; Law and economics; Normative; Democracy; Separation of powers; Legislature; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.050802376600789075,"score_gpt":0.27248719298953333,"score_spread":0.22168481638874427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238224044","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01344068,0.0033531005,0.15559968,0.04974499,0.0007547394,0.00015237366,0.00022566108,0.0001748683,0.7765539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.928326,0.0017038016,0.026629012,0.006689143,0.00081564614,0.00035241374,0.00019006999,0.0001319319,0.035161916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9820139,0.010210157,0.00069233024,0.002365859,0.003478987,0.001238894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870394,0.007814462,0.0006158312,0.0026509035,0.0014326939,0.0004466479],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01579386,0.00042141922,0.00060747034,0.001612331,0.004337976,0.008398804,0.001665189,0.0033458045,0.008829017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016456988,0.00030699844,0.0009004136,0.001422899,0.033106044,0.0077619897,0.0054349974,0.006068309,0.0011472617],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.7427134e-7,0.0000015250077,0.000015595928,0.0000063361,0.0000012321678,0.000004294778,0.00015565104,0.00011131264,0.000009843256,0.9987037,0.00041897365,0.000570647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004424477,0.0000029729983,0.000026619166,0.000035096276,0.000002304245,0.000010354206,0.00011237482,0.00028248495,0.00006765894,0.9751683,0.024284108,0.0000033038057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002691522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017645629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01579386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00823489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058291014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08352691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238345167","doi":"10.22215/etd/2007-07597","title":"Canada's accommodating judiciary: how the Supreme Court of Canada can actively encourage negotiations in aboriginal rights and treaty claims","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Canadian Heritage; Library and Archives Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Treaty; Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.013132198884151982,"score_gpt":0.28654894567041383,"score_spread":0.2734167467862619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238345167","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09971829,0.00295685,0.0038308573,0.1956377,0.0005764377,0.00016948319,0.00009946077,0.00008933726,0.6969216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9422966,0.0010082397,0.0019243188,0.012869518,0.000074168085,0.00006322262,0.000026775937,0.000043990014,0.04169325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877813,0.003798551,0.00020036101,0.0007966799,0.0026311167,0.0047919713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838261,0.0069583505,0.0006109882,0.00062869093,0.0041059065,0.0038699533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0124767665,0.0003254566,0.00038858218,0.0016186645,0.04676166,0.021400716,0.002844919,0.009154187,0.0084863985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03351322,0.00043094042,0.00040557806,0.0023372644,0.021169784,0.004842387,0.0077365227,0.008686754,0.0005890948],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000481885,0.00003552513,0.00357685,0.000057899702,0.00002133695,0.00061857054,0.045138925,0.0011586885,0.00031906518,0.855877,0.071734615,0.021413313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011798807,0.000044124674,0.011564629,0.00069606054,0.000120290264,0.00013932069,0.09243779,0.0035475024,0.00068275543,0.15868688,0.7317703,0.00019240525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9781528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99155945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86531496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13468505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31944272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.977213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238464789","doi":"10.26686/wgtn.17012060","title":"The implications of a supreme law Bill of Rights for judicial appointments in New Zealand","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Political science; Bill of rights; Commission; Judicial review; Human rights","score_opus":0.026396855507976283,"score_gpt":0.3290383673521254,"score_spread":0.3026415118441491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238464789","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24370721,0.003160718,0.0016378373,0.1621451,0.00078626006,0.00014543405,0.0001526581,0.000017126491,0.5882477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96044254,0.001659604,0.0006769033,0.0064936853,0.00016650915,0.000042082364,0.000024207413,0.000017219585,0.03047713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98802257,0.0032991874,0.0004969003,0.0010354243,0.0027496351,0.004396285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99145997,0.0033116746,0.001126163,0.00043783552,0.0019650694,0.0016993182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008610805,0.00021038076,0.00047573954,0.0009987069,0.016940758,0.010981431,0.0018075986,0.0038472684,0.0062663467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027548922,0.0004774172,0.0004784115,0.0013447297,0.023182802,0.004435205,0.003971468,0.009587023,0.00037183624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003980862,0.000038564853,0.0020548757,0.000045997716,0.000007240139,0.00065518875,0.025020372,0.00030075797,0.0004627436,0.9517045,0.010026104,0.009643849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001936319,0.00014859602,0.07964267,0.0011396433,0.0001120178,0.00054573285,0.09518165,0.0022312726,0.0010204449,0.21522944,0.6042268,0.00032810797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90461576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9406044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90461576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08208047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.075091444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59553826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238693520","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199397594.001.0001","title":"Commitment and Cooperation on High Courts","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Political science; Context (archaeology); Empirical research; Judicial opinion; Law; Politics; Affect (linguistics); Ideology; Sociology","score_opus":0.036475991986721586,"score_gpt":0.24942328351011037,"score_spread":0.2129472915233888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238693520","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08019348,0.0033058964,0.0015564237,0.00775865,0.00008662691,0.000013294857,0.000017792452,0.000018075229,0.9070497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.945984,0.0013349992,0.0003731116,0.0009266448,0.00008431249,0.000021044418,0.000019648318,0.000016075475,0.05123998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99454296,0.003356675,0.000069986636,0.00027678587,0.0010890791,0.0006645729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99605525,0.0020787888,0.00033610096,0.00030504522,0.0004823659,0.0007424552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002673376,0.00019499098,0.0002375893,0.0008145723,0.005001705,0.0057640984,0.0007656617,0.0011009244,0.0065575764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060275514,0.00017745285,0.00013513443,0.001626765,0.01018143,0.0021823125,0.004867445,0.0027450782,0.0008511936],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012683286,0.000042145257,0.0006993203,0.00002377683,0.0000052881983,0.0000758342,0.01100298,0.0005188194,0.00011437471,0.9622724,0.008824649,0.016407797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028733664,0.00008256317,0.01895828,0.00035436178,0.000018457664,0.00020568531,0.024439815,0.0015869372,0.00035707554,0.6890799,0.2648546,0.000033530356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066464315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006934477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066464315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00484978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032881643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03518778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239013235","doi":"10.3138/9781442623873-012","title":"10. Democracy and the Problem of Constitutional Change in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.027449376564768,"score_gpt":0.2115166977869307,"score_spread":0.18406732122216268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239013235","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01265347,0.022559296,0.0013193524,0.06149989,0.0006783052,0.000077309494,0.0005002716,0.000058565784,0.90065354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4727855,0.016808523,0.0017248206,0.012913931,0.00047363003,0.00011605618,0.0002492268,0.000105943305,0.49482238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972127,0.00036850816,0.00005338814,0.00024280298,0.0007861522,0.0013365251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983551,0.00061769504,0.00006585677,0.000081072685,0.00058718503,0.00029306085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014537618,0.00054561143,0.0005902492,0.0020470347,0.022630403,0.01252145,0.0018779427,0.0069704466,0.022097755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005961899,0.00047877987,0.00043547343,0.005089568,0.012998252,0.0030668203,0.0019008177,0.0055033676,0.0009211329],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067038136,0.000007048239,0.0002003674,0.000025891131,0.000002747118,0.000070055954,0.0016331662,0.00024244182,0.000025738249,0.96142125,0.0317542,0.004610488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037262973,0.000008944896,0.002961585,0.00023251344,0.000025446667,0.000067406865,0.004487922,0.0008302861,0.00016302471,0.22395404,0.7671899,0.00004164818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9920561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9957445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13873015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13873015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19428353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99895096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239043492","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.4.417","title":"DIGNITY, LIBERTY, EQUALITY: A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS TRIANGLE OF CONSTITUTIONALISM","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Constitutionalism; Politics; Ideology; Fundamental rights; Sociology; Law; Liberalism; Bill of rights; Political science; Law and economics; Human rights; Democracy","score_opus":0.028095736643470138,"score_gpt":0.2739936088723604,"score_spread":0.24589787222889026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239043492","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024688747,0.048843678,0.06860064,0.5445198,0.0026730148,0.00010980985,0.00016830165,0.00011869268,0.31027728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8686818,0.025242172,0.030785883,0.04886012,0.0052197725,0.0003854665,0.00013922593,0.00017445482,0.020511115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98591876,0.007532903,0.0004916545,0.0022470884,0.0026987132,0.0011108448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855247,0.010612847,0.0006953258,0.0013486018,0.0010040996,0.00081444264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014925378,0.0006212708,0.0013685764,0.0023915377,0.0063234065,0.020331627,0.0026291695,0.010783001,0.005410863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013222375,0.0004917085,0.0007423826,0.0026375868,0.09671569,0.034421876,0.01059373,0.025233978,0.0007107533],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017589368,0.0000042157453,0.000033412085,0.0000142476265,7.4666315e-7,0.000010177853,0.0009093107,0.000027565091,0.000023297027,0.996974,0.00058487983,0.0014164544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038507483,0.000006858379,0.00008309747,0.00008473012,0.0000011849181,0.00003176846,0.00071215647,0.0001317119,0.000028928767,0.97306395,0.02584506,0.00000670545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043787137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003051996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020331627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0101885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005734255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078933895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239126590","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3222081","title":"Formal Amendment Rules: Functions and Design","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Amendment; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.024200319832436024,"score_gpt":0.2784661220215614,"score_spread":0.25426580218912537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239126590","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01606788,0.00092303014,0.9163308,0.003125647,0.00034598281,0.0005531749,0.00036819815,0.0010154537,0.061269842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5609553,0.0008541127,0.40585938,0.00086520484,0.00044502452,0.0017451578,0.00042836447,0.00047794048,0.028369598],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94700456,0.036001116,0.004504377,0.004181658,0.0066217887,0.0016865289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8153502,0.1447355,0.0069561307,0.021129675,0.0105294995,0.0012990341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040380754,0.0009773676,0.0014200223,0.004080513,0.0024139213,0.014258545,0.0029221603,0.0035925321,0.010971491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1387377,0.0013991304,0.0015253607,0.0032374847,0.012007594,0.013177611,0.0025578607,0.0037566859,0.002682353],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023050643,0.000020092977,0.00022666361,0.000055761207,0.000011335849,0.00001349792,0.00022779957,0.0012044779,0.000069267735,0.9802287,0.001209008,0.016710274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053506064,0.00004848691,0.00012347747,0.00008269978,0.000043776872,0.000057707766,0.00017154646,0.009466407,0.0008244531,0.9743637,0.014737791,0.000026473555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015358186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012136018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040380754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030419943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056988024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21355641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239403724","doi":"10.22145/flr.28.3.2","title":"The Amicus Curiae and Intervener in the High Court of Australia: A Comparative Analysis","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; High Court; Law","score_opus":0.0715606218552786,"score_gpt":0.37732520514611634,"score_spread":0.3057645832908377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239403724","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78253525,0.013362915,0.00049111806,0.008149682,0.00010237454,0.000096756245,0.000045373872,0.0000058174505,0.19521077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859729,0.0035921899,0.00018801824,0.0011374984,0.000055173292,0.000051402058,0.000020700723,0.000006626907,0.008975523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890477,0.0056675104,0.00025791166,0.00035819202,0.0023063535,0.0023624573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990126,0.0054101637,0.0013397137,0.00025940617,0.002053733,0.0008109973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005914065,0.00018718014,0.0006565436,0.0055349865,0.008339523,0.0055060512,0.0011429316,0.0022426706,0.0049321637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023844447,0.00036168916,0.00035545978,0.0056835893,0.007111789,0.0028231323,0.0037984287,0.0030631549,0.00043909976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020302592,0.0004300556,0.026236163,0.000688862,0.00011450996,0.0027980115,0.16216901,0.000747125,0.0008519592,0.7371319,0.010604994,0.058024406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010073459,0.0007110237,0.53258353,0.0025317613,0.00043014926,0.0016067274,0.20384751,0.002967482,0.00091964443,0.04970271,0.20444803,0.00015071359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20677653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31486106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20677653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019110471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013813444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41114593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240555861","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.1.163","title":"ENDING IMPUNITY: CRITICAL REFLECTIONS ON THE PROSECUTION OF HEADS OF STATE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impunity; State (computer science); Law; Mandate; Political science; Politics; Rule of law; Accountability; Premise; Economic Justice; Transitional justice; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08930135471851057,"score_gpt":0.31760099509362677,"score_spread":0.2282996403751162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240555861","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014566569,0.21986218,0.0023873148,0.68686616,0.009119626,0.00005380538,0.000034005836,0.000024744324,0.067085534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55849373,0.16302928,0.0016284712,0.24111567,0.013835225,0.00021911309,0.000042873784,0.00010540017,0.021530287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98323625,0.011569541,0.00056448736,0.001030683,0.0016270725,0.0019718711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94208324,0.05247239,0.001653282,0.0004569078,0.0023219043,0.0010122693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023913203,0.0006984899,0.0010741159,0.0038296408,0.018489106,0.018435838,0.004264088,0.020875188,0.0016499159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035113823,0.00062765385,0.0006700462,0.0042493944,0.0651488,0.016406741,0.006247109,0.01971664,0.00038390578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020429236,0.000019509931,0.00040009778,0.00036840775,0.000010013196,0.0009001823,0.15587895,0.00011133861,0.00012075093,0.7530209,0.07688428,0.012265178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012721476,0.00004809348,0.0009755877,0.0025293697,0.000016818762,0.0005857745,0.21162878,0.00015026842,0.00038307044,0.10332863,0.68029594,0.000044956574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02809133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045588266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02809133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019343652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015814256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14034867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240974853","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198714514.003.0002","title":"1 The View from the Bench: Where the Comparative Judicial Imagination Travels","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Argument (complex analysis); Supreme court; Politics; Political science; Law; Context (archaeology); Judicial activism; Identity (music); Judicial independence; Constitutional law; Judicial opinion; Judicial review; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.04402152046291239,"score_gpt":0.26244189533926976,"score_spread":0.21842037487635738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240974853","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030567205,0.09439299,0.009548012,0.110215455,0.0015949834,0.000018274333,0.00008117283,0.000045398032,0.7535365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91516215,0.03372968,0.0030671558,0.008781166,0.0027239905,0.000056220575,0.000092421426,0.00015516665,0.036232036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882783,0.00909365,0.00014313374,0.00058740657,0.0014265183,0.0004709886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99054635,0.007855057,0.00027415584,0.00046993225,0.0005897819,0.00026471177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008792401,0.0004480261,0.0006649433,0.0043949606,0.01052932,0.021972343,0.0013617559,0.004155044,0.0059816656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013034137,0.00030230256,0.00030086064,0.0052870587,0.054009035,0.022603003,0.003864028,0.0071588187,0.0007708846],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004789338,0.0000050952003,0.000087667235,0.000033926746,0.0000014763127,0.000027799053,0.014418082,0.000027804994,0.000042382595,0.9759221,0.0036418969,0.0057868934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009329937,0.000023242097,0.00067525276,0.00070323073,0.000005841727,0.000107153006,0.040367436,0.00016827513,0.00013878469,0.7157828,0.2420049,0.0000137989855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064827544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009761916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021972343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0085514225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00462466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062045157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241459668","doi":"10.21991/c9nt04","title":"Introduction","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Constitutional law; Sociology","score_opus":0.0167153703095397,"score_gpt":0.2599391723198297,"score_spread":0.24322380201029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241459668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014465479,0.003950703,0.0024191537,0.023413392,0.009706312,0.00017912772,0.004169896,0.0005215721,0.9541934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012705297,0.003284473,0.0020121045,0.009323307,0.00212157,0.00014739625,0.003768692,0.00030222238,0.966335],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770087,0.00030441082,0.00009532264,0.0005160667,0.0010411132,0.00034221358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99746776,0.0003525139,0.00009531418,0.00028418403,0.0013396414,0.00046056413],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019957826,0.0006641893,0.00050089444,0.001487533,0.0038896608,0.007169014,0.0021189023,0.0034151864,0.41903496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006758158,0.00031027192,0.00060344563,0.0017982492,0.0015389345,0.0038154144,0.0036966004,0.0031069221,0.2115697],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003907119,0.000030362235,0.00058493303,0.00015420846,0.0000032587236,0.00010596168,0.001016958,0.00006953372,0.00015126778,0.08861753,0.8231649,0.086062096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016508114,0.0000051938823,0.0002446111,0.00006974887,7.0707193e-7,0.000031362393,0.00021274506,0.000010418496,0.000026134157,0.0027775266,0.99661714,0.0000027584658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016575571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017506735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58096504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043184343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005932869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8286761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241702564","doi":"10.5040/9781472558732.ch-013","title":"The Politics of Deference:Judicial Review and Democracy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Deference; Politics; Political science; Democracy; Judicial deference; Judicial review; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04179389128346481,"score_gpt":0.27709069438164463,"score_spread":0.23529680309817982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241702564","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014859999,0.06595736,0.006026872,0.13238275,0.0016554832,0.00003518175,0.000053079002,0.000056876957,0.7789723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84515285,0.018565614,0.0014964939,0.01342649,0.0038894545,0.00007594005,0.000033690707,0.00007129194,0.11728807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9812274,0.01023414,0.00038742318,0.0009985464,0.005443693,0.0017088176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97308975,0.02060831,0.0013927856,0.001164713,0.0030577397,0.0006866238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014460773,0.00024881324,0.0006283925,0.0015491578,0.0048132343,0.012612556,0.0011976492,0.005003604,0.0064115776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04414025,0.00028947918,0.00026150976,0.0021559882,0.017817127,0.005674943,0.0027390108,0.004864374,0.0010461939],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007399667,0.0000073276583,0.00007247398,0.000038343725,0.0000024949013,0.000028471522,0.00115145,0.0001366564,0.00003542159,0.9693941,0.019285744,0.0098401755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017430533,0.000015841239,0.00056669395,0.00029669047,0.0000059047343,0.000060318245,0.0010548355,0.00038924522,0.00012594141,0.80729914,0.190151,0.000016854166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005309928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007304015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014460773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006347102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011199629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07647681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242582533","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190075774.001.0001","title":"The History and Growth of Judicial Review, Volume 1","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Political science; Law; European union; Judicial activism; Common law; Economic Justice; Judicial independence; Democracy; Normative; Supreme court; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.025768170599019275,"score_gpt":0.25737160962395084,"score_spread":0.23160343902493155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242582533","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048802174,0.23854542,0.00203129,0.05962423,0.0053543756,0.00005230713,0.00025964098,0.00008242882,0.6891701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2344066,0.18597475,0.0026806109,0.018856687,0.01352566,0.0001849775,0.00046962206,0.0001977453,0.5437033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99508935,0.0018951137,0.00016270252,0.00039269708,0.002156864,0.0003033104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992473,0.0045034424,0.00041468706,0.00030191577,0.0020379326,0.00026904186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022666492,0.00021211035,0.0003662158,0.003490957,0.0026442586,0.008491327,0.0007869034,0.0014851573,0.0068113757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0086528575,0.00033178623,0.00021834696,0.0033817142,0.0067339838,0.0036732804,0.0012081958,0.002600297,0.0020071932],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018920591,0.000018315448,0.0004200662,0.00028372783,0.000006168894,0.000088686174,0.0019006043,0.00039412375,0.00012721967,0.58888966,0.3404515,0.067401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003990391,0.00000929004,0.00090894004,0.0004223837,0.0000020308455,0.00006222687,0.00040901368,0.00015796478,0.000097166085,0.028377717,0.9695413,0.000007926212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011943889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016430266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011943889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010379293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007911456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07530743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243102261","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2011.621655","title":"Canada: constitutional law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.03408508762595927,"score_gpt":0.28492890095226964,"score_spread":0.25084381332631034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243102261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009911834,0.002775931,0.0009704496,0.05455568,0.0014086487,0.00037205356,0.008868292,0.00062783173,0.9205092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06088105,0.0011858843,0.0014057001,0.025197422,0.0003985302,0.00026354854,0.0011060246,0.00031746988,0.9092444],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873403,0.0005849113,0.00037790253,0.0012369383,0.00723062,0.0032292402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887166,0.002228127,0.00020174123,0.00084337074,0.0065564658,0.0014536579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004702102,0.000974826,0.0009807219,0.0032415465,0.02700007,0.014666245,0.004107114,0.013294646,0.112808235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017030654,0.002037151,0.0009255149,0.0037595301,0.0067601167,0.0026458083,0.002672204,0.011173152,0.013110403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003870172,0.00008307983,0.001164561,0.00007947199,0.00001145298,0.00013510727,0.00089281175,0.00018038553,0.00044299717,0.2847526,0.6994371,0.012781647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041418483,0.000013714636,0.0041707186,0.0001307494,0.000023199524,0.000039812094,0.0005230562,0.00020943389,0.00040392388,0.007187319,0.9871875,0.00006911727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9847306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9923051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.112808235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10446247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22055174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7579318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243861227","doi":"10.2307/3505144","title":"10.2307/3505144","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Political philosophy; Legal formalism; Legal research; Legal realism; Empirical legal studies; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Black letter law; Politics; Comparative law; Private law","score_opus":0.013089990980405737,"score_gpt":0.22750381308217638,"score_spread":0.21441382210177065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243861227","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024590033,0.00033791957,0.00028199225,0.00028289622,0.00032665412,0.00004076801,0.0008398894,0.0005143943,0.9971296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010087038,0.0003646652,0.00039743187,0.00036700114,0.00009229584,0.00003072785,0.0011073949,0.00032062456,0.9963111],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944633,0.000053914788,0.000042149964,0.00013843288,0.00023576764,0.00008334121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807346,0.00045930725,0.00007490759,0.00036322416,0.00045135527,0.0005775736],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081775157,0.0014956224,0.0011397722,0.002369167,0.001782987,0.0051944465,0.0018346066,0.0025781842,0.9848681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022574735,0.0007759938,0.0007348225,0.002808215,0.0018210895,0.0056907614,0.004187309,0.0016393969,0.9846453],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012785298,0.00012642733,0.000394104,0.00038855293,0.000012440656,0.00014931799,0.00009248651,0.00012477305,0.0010797388,0.006967314,0.609458,0.38107896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020165708,0.000026195881,0.0007304382,0.00017451726,0.0000049391006,0.00016485406,0.00012324918,0.000087408924,0.00015794448,0.0012841297,0.9972128,0.0000133443755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042364686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046256916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015131891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012162444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014431381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021583796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243942785","doi":"10.1017/9781108335690.006","title":"The Federal Courts of Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Internet privacy; Political science; Law; Computer science; Law and economics; Computer security; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.022071053778746966,"score_gpt":0.2073884246494561,"score_spread":0.18531737087070912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243942785","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004805684,0.025322353,0.00034678177,0.032876544,0.00084045297,0.000034021537,0.0014529359,0.00007025432,0.934251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14192607,0.012090848,0.0006884852,0.0071754223,0.00021485308,0.000040862084,0.0006046845,0.00006794995,0.83719087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997297,0.00014928596,0.00003988329,0.00021101802,0.0013970144,0.0009058439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984548,0.00017903805,0.000034599252,0.000065687025,0.001033023,0.00023277348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008780161,0.00040269244,0.00038261275,0.0017907039,0.014785109,0.007332053,0.0012018112,0.0027985242,0.03216155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003526331,0.00037298637,0.00030033218,0.0032516997,0.0034817578,0.0016067246,0.001155155,0.0028500236,0.00237315],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009882516,0.000007517978,0.00056834205,0.00007392848,0.0000041263615,0.00008327236,0.0010705183,0.00013847387,0.00009161428,0.5754889,0.39720872,0.02525464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035866929,0.0000027487542,0.0025289203,0.0001908575,0.000005970816,0.000030365629,0.0008015701,0.000119316726,0.000078248995,0.012124518,0.9841009,0.000012988388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9866642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99455065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8998006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.100199394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1616386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7270009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245069027","doi":"10.4324/9780429037399-62","title":"Legislation—Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02975286073703928,"score_gpt":0.24994664873454342,"score_spread":0.22019378799750414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245069027","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011037538,0.0034433706,0.00022276196,0.0113698775,0.0008254917,0.000101983576,0.0013140042,0.00009797382,0.98152083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008590182,0.002457008,0.00053861004,0.011751715,0.00010006705,0.00007978551,0.0006400692,0.000061480256,0.97578114],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99680483,0.00014370834,0.000073523806,0.00037208264,0.0017962422,0.00080962747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981719,0.00018474546,0.00003856881,0.00007454076,0.0012700172,0.00026027803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011586203,0.0007119678,0.00046481256,0.002707688,0.016166708,0.0090631535,0.0022641714,0.0061718165,0.086357765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028059047,0.0006222901,0.00060814084,0.0040646503,0.003166751,0.0018937105,0.0020293717,0.0047648815,0.014786845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070866085,0.000018415689,0.0002448457,0.0000776569,0.0000026008986,0.00015388624,0.00076117594,0.00007985439,0.00011867117,0.25035107,0.7272609,0.020923844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020264224,0.0000013339987,0.0002625859,0.000047709073,0.000001520805,0.0000201329,0.0001321069,0.00001715891,0.000024690009,0.0009565148,0.99852955,0.000004613966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96650195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9838108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.086357765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08392334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14297237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6089093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245165506","doi":"10.26686/wgtn.17006857.v1","title":"Mandatory pre-enactment review of legislation; or should only one government branch be responsible for the protection of rights in the United States?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Judicial review; Order (exchange); Government (linguistics); Law; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.08245029498750828,"score_gpt":0.3566531621127831,"score_spread":0.2742028671252748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245165506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33483192,0.016980756,0.018679628,0.21999763,0.0016946144,0.0002888801,0.00012890673,0.00019427674,0.40720335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95757806,0.0020409215,0.0059447954,0.01659695,0.0002720611,0.00010342458,0.000034019005,0.000022763044,0.017406946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97100854,0.016285058,0.0017108377,0.003340147,0.0044876924,0.0031677105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9449641,0.03385363,0.006342784,0.0052201273,0.007817347,0.0018020064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028207408,0.00015971855,0.00030922535,0.00081472134,0.0058303704,0.0069335965,0.0012070201,0.005228658,0.0022929758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045275904,0.0004679916,0.00039870973,0.0007264851,0.0074927057,0.0052875397,0.0029184255,0.004883906,0.00047133156],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006307185,0.0001392704,0.012711228,0.0003636651,0.000027941773,0.00047696818,0.015346428,0.00061447517,0.0028375124,0.83390427,0.029256003,0.10425922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010100609,0.00058414455,0.13286096,0.002451261,0.00018157254,0.0009767665,0.025817042,0.0021537784,0.011146542,0.16915756,0.65429866,0.00027075625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015902227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034821942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028207408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004208576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015174185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14917684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245238683","doi":"10.22215/etd/2013-06747","title":"Achieving legitimacy : the legal relationship between indigenous peoples and the Canadian state","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Canadian Heritage; Library and Archives Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Political science; Indigenous; State (computer science); Humanities; Library science; Law; Computer science; Art; Politics","score_opus":0.030283538396888222,"score_gpt":0.29617221085255635,"score_spread":0.2658886724556681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245238683","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38292816,0.0022040168,0.000792853,0.044627275,0.00011085245,0.00005772869,0.00011533913,0.000016961021,0.5691468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98830146,0.00046273286,0.0001912783,0.00062747084,0.000013477844,0.0000066661014,0.000010848896,0.0000051511934,0.010380888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99510795,0.0008343051,0.00007847484,0.00037100317,0.001524426,0.002083744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99347734,0.001842024,0.00044960636,0.00029527102,0.0025947364,0.0013410944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00391506,0.00018063583,0.00029196122,0.0021503137,0.0424361,0.010869349,0.0018930925,0.0022873918,0.0069227642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015329334,0.00021057323,0.00019552904,0.002979575,0.03784824,0.0027952471,0.004300982,0.0035418672,0.00019743016],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027291004,0.000032593227,0.008710747,0.000041772462,0.000010099781,0.00032082165,0.14960015,0.00019886569,0.00029642717,0.8138582,0.006950749,0.01995229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004521919,0.00003901403,0.08627837,0.0006289944,0.00007623192,0.0002702793,0.49017707,0.00089670805,0.0007212962,0.11341519,0.30730745,0.00014415389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9934062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99720335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11628368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11628368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21656924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84370106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245308103","doi":"10.3138/9781487535995-013","title":"Chapter Eight. The Supreme Court of Canada, Parliament, and the Role of Experts","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.018889503337006466,"score_gpt":0.19602329828315396,"score_spread":0.1771337949461475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245308103","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019598785,0.06339292,0.00041953253,0.031420186,0.0012172483,0.000035537043,0.00084372464,0.00004931097,0.9006617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.050093047,0.015595662,0.00039623262,0.00626412,0.00036976128,0.000044736145,0.00024568115,0.000045864082,0.926945],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989704,0.000093058596,0.00001594949,0.00006897829,0.0005114934,0.0003401252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999119,0.0002486644,0.000031934273,0.000027789412,0.00037683878,0.0001958119],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005382526,0.0004693394,0.00034535493,0.0015101187,0.0112109985,0.0072528413,0.0016042022,0.0037831976,0.04044456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001750571,0.0003900678,0.00018629343,0.002930466,0.004396031,0.0016848905,0.0008212556,0.0030899316,0.0034857953],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010223166,0.000013621993,0.00021039936,0.00009075576,0.0000019644938,0.00007089188,0.0024352346,0.000090257556,0.00007743011,0.43264177,0.54643524,0.017922102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003849052,0.0000018377523,0.0010834641,0.000203647,0.0000035393923,0.00002873832,0.0015884028,0.00004369422,0.000059202117,0.021078596,0.9758985,0.000006534583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9182395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.982236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.081760526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050436057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07051311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36594093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245317821","doi":"10.4135/9781604265774.n361","title":"Constitutional Amending Process","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Encyclopedia of the First Amendment","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Computer science; Political science; Programming language","score_opus":0.024769301496125697,"score_gpt":0.2967305362290835,"score_spread":0.2719612347329578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245317821","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019526426,0.00086968904,0.004401911,0.0033512125,0.00049209065,0.00014745335,0.00043038256,0.00011620407,0.9882384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11746754,0.0012608366,0.006779785,0.005256353,0.0006795606,0.0003571936,0.00067697157,0.00023161304,0.86729014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98870546,0.0027473678,0.0005901706,0.0020181353,0.004843524,0.0010953968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954724,0.0020799933,0.00012845392,0.0011359378,0.0010720129,0.00011125636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067600044,0.00054406724,0.0008036279,0.0023328043,0.0054107965,0.01038504,0.0022671605,0.0066352617,0.06345967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022494925,0.0005476191,0.0008022204,0.0022565671,0.0046000495,0.004302559,0.0029349674,0.007911302,0.015652206],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006203373,0.000014328074,0.0000507181,0.00001376155,0.0000021141047,0.000030246452,0.00037887966,0.00008312934,0.0000981989,0.9695385,0.021574453,0.008209413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017635737,0.000020534593,0.00045511415,0.00016279134,0.000011871529,0.00006435817,0.00030767266,0.00037532704,0.0007127528,0.23085167,0.7669945,0.000025697904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012287168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01510031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06345967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006361837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009891407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21229374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245355756","doi":"10.3138/9781442687721","title":"Contemporary Canadian Federalism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.038013267425203,"score_gpt":0.2329299119498765,"score_spread":0.1949166445246735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245355756","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011031774,0.015285262,0.00071123656,0.04060074,0.0005956232,0.000018951625,0.0003169748,0.00006541532,0.931374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6270105,0.019689765,0.0015951731,0.008854205,0.00035038163,0.00005631231,0.00035396474,0.000093731804,0.34199592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973701,0.00021167024,0.000035812638,0.00024242412,0.0010479161,0.0010919765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989666,0.00014471196,0.000032840348,0.00005711476,0.00063780806,0.00016095361],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012396914,0.00034131538,0.0003254287,0.0022066263,0.022739122,0.0077772415,0.0011530279,0.0017888994,0.011313561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029528304,0.00027819216,0.00034456383,0.0047635455,0.010208437,0.0017447892,0.0015879136,0.0029400955,0.00064309756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056792273,0.0000026628973,0.0002956328,0.000029323523,0.0000025830861,0.00003626567,0.0035311622,0.00011222571,0.00003783414,0.9243092,0.06229205,0.009345359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006050854,0.0000040107025,0.004059699,0.00014117008,0.0000114545255,0.00006383133,0.0045743445,0.00021692379,0.00006474125,0.0593597,0.93147266,0.000025363584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99198043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9962465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81895477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18104522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14422193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9498715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245955782","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1884416","title":"Measuring Legislative Boundaries","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.059634984908167474,"score_gpt":0.2713462916166129,"score_spread":0.2117113067084454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245955782","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5787239,0.0021336535,0.03174323,0.0020181374,0.0001722556,0.0003270605,0.0016717995,0.00023447032,0.3829755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847186,0.00021892067,0.008884875,0.00023085326,0.000045340286,0.00029778943,0.0007322731,0.00005103636,0.0048203953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859526,0.005671338,0.0011369361,0.002370514,0.003987474,0.0008811338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92032623,0.04451538,0.01295978,0.008905376,0.010355935,0.0029373646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012928168,0.00042246422,0.00067989214,0.0092931,0.0048533115,0.0072074435,0.0014925714,0.0020654073,0.015458521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08562422,0.0005629709,0.0006181308,0.006407162,0.00400315,0.010356988,0.005503433,0.002521929,0.0025224665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027905894,0.00032090186,0.31729823,0.00052632473,0.00016642947,0.00021670092,0.024841556,0.004236218,0.0030560647,0.49391845,0.008552595,0.14658758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009626104,0.0005499872,0.40592656,0.0017056933,0.00043235114,0.00047748088,0.050924085,0.016399141,0.01275234,0.36584553,0.14473206,0.0001585943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043782857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006100334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015458521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003072757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004269627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068371534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246612561","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.3.405","title":"JUDICIAL POLITICS IN AUTHORITARIAN REGIMES","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Dialectic; Rule of law; Law; Constraint (computer-aided design); Politics; Political science; Power (physics); Law and economics; Judicial independence; Judicial review; Adjudication; Independence (probability theory); Sociology; Democracy; Epistemology; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015423808318879165,"score_gpt":0.2529957120198597,"score_spread":0.23757190370098055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246612561","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0924921,0.045581188,0.014054775,0.021585392,0.0004576091,0.000049857073,0.000043056036,0.000036671154,0.8256994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97419554,0.010146984,0.0010912953,0.001753086,0.0005925404,0.000043389,0.000018202092,0.000014552552,0.012144401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927199,0.0035342914,0.00033430912,0.0007004791,0.0015250022,0.0011860593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99523854,0.003068883,0.00075318187,0.00038220102,0.00034260508,0.00021463941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004744103,0.00019532705,0.00046145407,0.0015674812,0.0049412055,0.008493627,0.00095549796,0.0035423941,0.0025030917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006261417,0.00036145942,0.00029697065,0.0022456048,0.021867117,0.0038335812,0.003076152,0.0032871566,0.00034370314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017354433,0.0000036533022,0.0001281695,0.000024711737,0.0000014563867,0.000043399163,0.0019662837,0.00011866182,0.0000547206,0.99506396,0.0004946351,0.0020985855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027696322,0.000033413366,0.003352865,0.00053805363,0.000011762475,0.0003783868,0.0059430413,0.00063561846,0.000521595,0.72320265,0.2653301,0.000024757335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005180772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073055713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008493627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006325636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034691803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045895875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246713511","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.519","title":"REGULATION AND PUBLIC LAW IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Delegation; Democracy; Legitimacy; Legislature; Political science; Statute; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.026559781979468653,"score_gpt":0.2704350863892322,"score_spread":0.24387530440976354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246713511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0077118855,0.01927131,0.0056812335,0.027082784,0.00026234167,0.000016737993,0.00006113414,0.00003247587,0.93988013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9290324,0.01296511,0.002302584,0.0073686372,0.0011256391,0.0001155658,0.00010930808,0.00005837514,0.04692242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943843,0.0031005843,0.00010648648,0.0005376856,0.00092444953,0.00094652025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959966,0.0025428345,0.00027170184,0.00044742136,0.00051596836,0.00022553632],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040587205,0.0003264638,0.0006079942,0.0029830884,0.0071064276,0.015790392,0.0012350266,0.0053132763,0.010552679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059121842,0.00031303664,0.0005302853,0.0029775046,0.0410604,0.0068893475,0.003298493,0.004662106,0.0007713204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010047203,0.0000024489523,0.00003158055,0.000008375221,9.0106187e-7,0.00000846595,0.00040060948,0.00006823129,0.000012965761,0.99808997,0.0006520322,0.0007232683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011825775,0.00001940551,0.00087897555,0.00021024635,0.000013433333,0.00008291335,0.0026705554,0.0004015353,0.00017034097,0.69299376,0.30253512,0.000011768621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031652622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03010659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031652622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026389556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007628073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1914705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246812994","doi":"10.21991/cf29372","title":"Introduction","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Library science; Management; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.014407567624850822,"score_gpt":0.26246307782026373,"score_spread":0.24805551019541291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246812994","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011458143,0.0075490223,0.003416803,0.0513552,0.020929532,0.00020107142,0.0051438147,0.0006403891,0.90961826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015906246,0.008486584,0.0029941783,0.018905433,0.009497999,0.0002614214,0.0061070956,0.0005010808,0.93733996],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752384,0.0003658403,0.00011121157,0.0005765359,0.0010903741,0.0003322134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956572,0.0008522151,0.00018939388,0.00042715445,0.0022598119,0.00061423925],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021103092,0.00071647373,0.000531961,0.0020216482,0.0028675487,0.0069033843,0.0022585876,0.003422,0.42697382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010639523,0.00030839804,0.00060490187,0.0021956435,0.0013878247,0.0047499603,0.0030467224,0.00312824,0.19471209],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025897518,0.000021312837,0.00035307373,0.00018217626,0.0000031584464,0.00007330199,0.00043472982,0.00006682278,0.00008996878,0.058989156,0.8738206,0.06593988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017501541,0.000004579074,0.00022091343,0.00011724603,8.380203e-7,0.000036616857,0.00016411992,0.000015084202,0.000022170478,0.003895119,0.99551857,0.0000030001045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0079231905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076805465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5730262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037883574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004624423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8173523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246913416","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195335354.003.0003","title":"Courts","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Charter; Federalism; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.032160369250661,"score_gpt":0.23190682354898737,"score_spread":0.19974645429832638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246913416","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00060917455,0.002853033,0.0008438472,0.0034163238,0.0003787367,0.00003307454,0.00026505685,0.000040211253,0.9915605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.052081767,0.0051489975,0.0010846804,0.005648125,0.0004091295,0.000053112202,0.0004250484,0.00007151698,0.93507767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985251,0.00017483892,0.000055061173,0.0002701705,0.0007151396,0.00025966912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990395,0.00015118008,0.000026307287,0.00009984944,0.0006093801,0.00007370881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075133966,0.0003934113,0.00030961534,0.0015994773,0.0064515737,0.0061804946,0.0011453289,0.00225881,0.08138415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023367973,0.00023763707,0.0003022193,0.002028664,0.0039952337,0.0023259448,0.0018321179,0.0026038764,0.014154902],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043802665,0.0000058068135,0.000112605536,0.000039230305,0.0000018684038,0.000049308936,0.0007504463,0.00010146447,0.00011575236,0.8501844,0.12383564,0.0247991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000213106,0.000002339804,0.00014573816,0.000074840435,0.0000016781062,0.000020572052,0.00020882957,0.000043967895,0.00005470719,0.018937677,0.9805043,0.0000031985019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35772374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39963862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35772374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016668728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017979903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247424246","doi":"10.3167/004058105780929273","title":"Constitutional Learning","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoria","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Democracy; Federalism; Politics; Political science; Constitutional crisis; Liberal democracy; Law; Presidential system; Political economy; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.019940313289468773,"score_gpt":0.3032975533610416,"score_spread":0.2833572400715728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247424246","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024154698,0.0048505873,0.008775799,0.03666889,0.0014591654,0.00003688772,0.0002386943,0.00010130605,0.94545317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34345776,0.011744785,0.009450072,0.028624898,0.005169124,0.00017747804,0.00084591145,0.00032435555,0.60020566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997115,0.00094548013,0.00013499585,0.00065230945,0.0008631503,0.00028901713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99376774,0.00330809,0.0002503698,0.0013555868,0.0009354414,0.00038288115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046833893,0.00034301684,0.0003142153,0.0010907857,0.005047765,0.0073717134,0.0012419346,0.0026695556,0.07597054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015205669,0.0002177752,0.00034680267,0.0010784315,0.013510881,0.007664068,0.0036416398,0.0056368713,0.011782789],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024400904,0.000006724096,0.00007045042,0.000016518487,0.0000011314064,0.000011393523,0.0002496177,0.000059181835,0.000023268469,0.9600283,0.026519068,0.013011795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004457079,0.0000069280372,0.0001384185,0.00008860051,0.0000016702397,0.000036587957,0.00034466936,0.00010240289,0.00011595338,0.33325174,0.66590375,0.0000048367338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038480582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005958837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07597054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005566268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004829101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25414675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247438753","doi":"10.5860/choice.51-0510","title":"Judicial power in a federal system: Canada, United States, and Germany","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Choice Reviews Online","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Political science; Law","score_opus":0.026178366542338627,"score_gpt":0.2986725692637659,"score_spread":0.27249420272142727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247438753","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81257653,0.007617523,0.0003410832,0.031910196,0.00016070626,0.000055795867,0.0013016991,0.000038955914,0.14599755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896571,0.00092195027,0.00009794768,0.0012919783,0.000034917062,0.000011218384,0.000114062525,0.000010584597,0.007860154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923189,0.00089789275,0.00014081971,0.00043881056,0.0021729982,0.0040304577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98070425,0.007406111,0.001716754,0.0004435823,0.006063017,0.003666219],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004986685,0.00020609483,0.0008745364,0.004982397,0.014854386,0.013167519,0.0016413946,0.0031383603,0.007352338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020789113,0.00033115927,0.00038012798,0.010208905,0.008294096,0.002877921,0.0020290879,0.0027008732,0.00030954095],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005127366,0.00033323833,0.11257019,0.00019763838,0.00016572876,0.0007051807,0.025578136,0.0029403188,0.00041297713,0.7064847,0.09445281,0.055646464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028767932,0.00016056705,0.6172398,0.0007286954,0.0004755227,0.00016689391,0.08557027,0.00523438,0.0013627559,0.051616076,0.23684226,0.00031512787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9826596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99440706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09509381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09509381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12538403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68995714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247837931","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv56fggn.4","title":"The Rule of Law in the Canadian Constitution","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Political science; Rule of law","score_opus":0.03792333151521577,"score_gpt":0.22821491347310258,"score_spread":0.1902915819578868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247837931","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008492904,0.0147842765,0.001275449,0.028599676,0.0006947003,0.0000403938,0.0001945101,0.00003931459,0.94587886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59952265,0.013284782,0.0022513915,0.009499169,0.0007155774,0.00007070356,0.00017741208,0.000148456,0.37432992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99597436,0.00070892804,0.00008219502,0.0004013843,0.0015277693,0.0013053603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977518,0.0008203905,0.00006417343,0.00016219466,0.00094754,0.0002539331],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028944144,0.0006125835,0.0005786979,0.0029250488,0.017933546,0.014426501,0.0017420779,0.004916668,0.010686536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008410074,0.00067259,0.00038645446,0.0047607343,0.02802721,0.0030982736,0.0016291669,0.0070175347,0.0008895154],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041711924,0.0000032147318,0.00008347581,0.000014479219,0.000001678305,0.000023116641,0.0016738918,0.00016265527,0.000027807218,0.9786081,0.015022253,0.004375124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020438716,0.0000075863213,0.0024333633,0.000294043,0.000020786989,0.00003528854,0.003001329,0.00044655293,0.0001417979,0.30519962,0.6883526,0.000046614336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9874992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.992615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1236942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1236942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1979607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8974684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247912287","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199604456.013.0013","title":"The Judicialization of Politics","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Legitimacy; Demise; Judicial review; Law; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.027087241119759724,"score_gpt":0.23687935841367114,"score_spread":0.20979211729391142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247912287","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008642344,0.025144642,0.0068254066,0.023080751,0.0011577574,0.000028144492,0.000041480936,0.00003605284,0.9350434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.767106,0.019885791,0.001931286,0.009660703,0.0039638937,0.00010710703,0.00008877063,0.000065657354,0.19719073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977581,0.0010389223,0.00007624189,0.0003077854,0.00062857446,0.00019034199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99750406,0.0015991584,0.00014908733,0.0002935856,0.00038957363,0.00006459092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002001455,0.00017972494,0.00018309787,0.0008498625,0.0024337429,0.0050071734,0.0005082532,0.0013765817,0.0034380695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035345107,0.0001679944,0.00020229159,0.00081798463,0.017131858,0.0027471322,0.0013337116,0.0031296962,0.000564802],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.829909e-7,0.0000023638945,0.00002678011,0.000010723844,5.018178e-7,0.000011583028,0.00036857367,0.00008321023,0.000046928002,0.9922805,0.0041353866,0.0030325213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008142832,0.000015403442,0.0005688601,0.00028885598,0.0000037237533,0.000070994894,0.00068035774,0.0006415518,0.00029316652,0.5501486,0.44727254,0.000007711139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041037607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043588667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0050071734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00459654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003921663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033350408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248404925","doi":"10.1177/0067205x0403200101","title":"Rights, 'Dialogue' and Democratic Objections to Judicial Review","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Law; Project commissioning; Law and economics; Publishing; Judicial review; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.028867238795380747,"score_gpt":0.31940084993682827,"score_spread":0.29053361114144755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248404925","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005716451,0.011833466,0.005484576,0.9016532,0.00332881,0.00007519438,0.00006222162,0.000064076,0.07178202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49208468,0.006678833,0.0068956083,0.44842243,0.020182053,0.00072836195,0.00008918492,0.00017215773,0.024746712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.709186,0.17024787,0.012465879,0.022843927,0.0697141,0.015542253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.527182,0.40487954,0.016001964,0.020576447,0.025481198,0.005878806],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.22251421,0.0006572952,0.0017587811,0.004743957,0.017301489,0.02746531,0.0054496806,0.03853482,0.0039428743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.37215164,0.0010328197,0.001463278,0.0038069873,0.10069883,0.020830072,0.012299848,0.0363361,0.0008777856],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000136850895,0.000013009157,0.00016515283,0.000050937524,0.000013328676,0.00003986873,0.003234322,0.00008035177,0.000036535745,0.9641645,0.027520256,0.0046679885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011188089,0.000030678028,0.00063521956,0.00032879997,0.00002981145,0.00012296009,0.0019111414,0.00035853064,0.00021944146,0.7359081,0.26028025,0.00006315955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018849332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018369207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22251421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020703511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02877471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9587784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248688215","doi":"10.21991/c9vq2q","title":"SECTION 33 AND THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEGISLATURES AND COURTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Constitution; Law; Political science; Section (typography); Politics; Separation of powers; Government (linguistics); Balance (ability); Business","score_opus":0.06463527563743278,"score_gpt":0.28574065324498915,"score_spread":0.22110537760755639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248688215","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031921767,0.012585335,0.011231055,0.11880815,0.0013619364,0.000083454666,0.00013604364,0.00006635583,0.823806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.847156,0.0058782655,0.005804714,0.04440534,0.0013620943,0.0003073393,0.00009475669,0.00005956593,0.094931856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98573595,0.008049532,0.0003972826,0.0012574797,0.0027413126,0.0018184214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99153626,0.005353524,0.0010095964,0.0005158294,0.0011530085,0.00043179866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008447987,0.00017235121,0.00019799345,0.0014192159,0.0069802133,0.0066687036,0.0008826673,0.005429742,0.006269112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016916927,0.00036636367,0.00023667293,0.001431914,0.020323835,0.0042952136,0.0025217182,0.0064499904,0.0010341726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016267226,0.0000019193396,0.00018179971,0.0000042982583,5.395088e-7,0.000018686549,0.0011622591,0.000021546517,0.000029846553,0.9942783,0.002661028,0.0016380608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017075417,0.000042133288,0.0062079737,0.00033906716,0.000008653235,0.00015271743,0.0024432018,0.00023435161,0.00026716103,0.5029814,0.48727086,0.000035366145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04719628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06694569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04719628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006806036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013418834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0938431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249081328","doi":"10.31228/osf.io/e9py5","title":"Abusive Emulation and Justificatory Borrowing","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Douglas College","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Scrutiny; Law and economics; Context (archaeology); Constitution; Autocracy; Political science; Law; Democracy; Sociology","score_opus":0.046520428986605855,"score_gpt":0.3245348488080741,"score_spread":0.27801441982146824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249081328","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055553455,0.0016220274,0.06034957,0.022298543,0.00047413772,0.00013517159,0.0001519117,0.00028597165,0.8591293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92650545,0.00067611324,0.009298159,0.004319143,0.0004162474,0.00014593499,0.00007052783,0.00019761921,0.058370795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98602086,0.006299715,0.0007172926,0.002770792,0.0026478942,0.0015434729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9821776,0.0067999163,0.0013957433,0.00712966,0.0020769658,0.00042005445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015600225,0.0005354893,0.00083674426,0.0013489467,0.004816061,0.0072211386,0.0026015257,0.005696914,0.01778937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04367175,0.0005948067,0.0006211595,0.0013689415,0.020009372,0.011945898,0.008878871,0.0069776196,0.0024931629],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008219608,0.0000051082734,0.00013261515,0.000008725729,0.0000023180892,0.00003394253,0.0005272783,0.000057944933,0.00005258466,0.9956934,0.0012760914,0.0022018005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002408469,0.000012924781,0.00029205423,0.0001010235,0.000012353783,0.00013854192,0.0007144294,0.0011941135,0.00066908903,0.9260552,0.07076807,0.000018162902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002627482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033006256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01778937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004273513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038353228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08250284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249344689","doi":"10.1017/s0008423907070254","title":"The Courts","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Government (linguistics); Politics; Audit; Constitutional court; Public administration; Sociology; Constitution; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.025866911710126894,"score_gpt":0.32130070467779775,"score_spread":0.29543379296767086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249344689","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001398791,0.06489221,0.0016017904,0.05453993,0.002554137,0.00003975034,0.00083531,0.0001510654,0.87398696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.054965094,0.024449456,0.00132114,0.013475371,0.0007107786,0.000039459712,0.00059895444,0.00011696623,0.9043228],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754447,0.000308635,0.00007044115,0.00032318124,0.001268268,0.00048505623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871254,0.00015870543,0.000060779927,0.0001330651,0.0007208781,0.00021403801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010785065,0.00056531146,0.00036040586,0.001248459,0.009134498,0.011721361,0.0013342681,0.003804785,0.05695192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051128874,0.00046097927,0.00029370838,0.0025436685,0.005854932,0.004382863,0.0019757496,0.0035162084,0.013835378],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069648836,0.0000072209605,0.00030585795,0.000044811488,0.0000028791803,0.000037676014,0.00089367566,0.00006552878,0.000065558226,0.28140488,0.6793601,0.037804857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001305049,0.0000013227312,0.000411758,0.00008281058,0.000001347745,0.00002560532,0.00045210647,0.00002105955,0.000032385047,0.010499643,0.9884672,0.0000035761598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5825728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74976367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41742718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022245152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033952903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249658205","doi":"10.1515/icl-2019-0052","title":"Judicial Review (Departmentalism) vs Supremacy: The Connection to a 17th Century Debate and a Dilemma for Today","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ICL Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Supreme court; Judicial review; Law; Separation of powers; Legislature; State (computer science); Unitary state; Sovereignty; Political science; Judicial activism; Power (physics); Interpretation (philosophy); Dilemma; Enumerated powers; Judicial interpretation; Philosophy; Politics; Epistemology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0444017283513609,"score_gpt":0.32340335831165345,"score_spread":0.27900162996029254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249658205","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025703484,0.07152136,0.002321729,0.6710463,0.0023642585,0.000014990451,0.00006896095,0.000033213208,0.22692564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81716233,0.032342702,0.0023898385,0.092619576,0.010095356,0.00006200093,0.00005363856,0.000100973164,0.045173466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928421,0.0032781286,0.00023377166,0.00071205513,0.0018314753,0.0011026107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886241,0.0075739007,0.00067715184,0.00042197295,0.0018389315,0.00086388376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014849447,0.00023974263,0.00053254137,0.002919727,0.01026885,0.016300444,0.0015790617,0.011707363,0.004097331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01167261,0.00037771947,0.0004211907,0.0019861052,0.05032496,0.011211548,0.0022225736,0.010035045,0.00055037526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005802015,0.000008018754,0.00008758371,0.000013100516,0.000001917788,0.000046408568,0.003113324,0.000031909804,0.0000406305,0.98487306,0.008586218,0.0031921463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024834457,0.00001514206,0.0007526853,0.00038687393,0.0000064005426,0.00012534625,0.004601707,0.00022283607,0.00018370911,0.46773887,0.5259035,0.000038054284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053222507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053072687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053222507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029864553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013886981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2166835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249892796","doi":"10.1057/978-1-137-52159-0_2","title":"Lower Courts","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Aotearoa; Law; Officer; Political science; Work (physics); Sociology; History; Engineering","score_opus":0.037099568507252136,"score_gpt":0.284012807240196,"score_spread":0.24691323873294388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249892796","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032492538,0.002255127,0.0005195,0.002281662,0.00018025306,0.000011783459,0.00008365503,0.000021507474,0.99139726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18308447,0.002831735,0.0007853809,0.001408868,0.00024195266,0.000035909245,0.00017543923,0.000045091943,0.81139123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985078,0.00036713303,0.00004558919,0.00019841036,0.0006142983,0.00026667147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991423,0.00028337777,0.000056846282,0.000111616275,0.00029146307,0.000114389106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076413143,0.00020450339,0.00023480202,0.0010603388,0.0039901435,0.0063161445,0.000609494,0.001287847,0.053372007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030298047,0.00013822995,0.00015817025,0.0016935009,0.00351372,0.002235448,0.0018320933,0.001834239,0.006209882],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033884498,0.000008822426,0.00018762352,0.000034985274,0.0000010890415,0.000026421118,0.0029151186,0.00007217668,0.00010040196,0.8984951,0.0691431,0.02901179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016588411,0.0000065416634,0.0012679606,0.00011880568,0.0000014596383,0.000031787666,0.0013879318,0.00008522151,0.00010303841,0.043225188,0.95376617,0.0000042084976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031366874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06384825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053372007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070482534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046156277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17854714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249976768","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0037","title":"The role of the courts in the political constitution","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Constitution; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Legislature; Law; Political science; Judicial review; Principal (computer security); Constitutional law; Enforcement; Judicial independence; Constitutional theory; Sociology; Law and economics; Democracy","score_opus":0.0070442479614752545,"score_gpt":0.22683069639267164,"score_spread":0.21978644843119638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249976768","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03378326,0.010863583,0.03274487,0.10948561,0.00077844074,0.00010877619,0.000081440856,0.00008818698,0.8120658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9499753,0.0027613286,0.0058744187,0.0075454456,0.0007646725,0.00017904479,0.000031441305,0.000052985433,0.03281535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97940546,0.012078814,0.00061471574,0.0015526761,0.003198764,0.0031495863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984567,0.011160776,0.0010056343,0.0009824471,0.0013777085,0.000906507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01504638,0.00037286564,0.0006369007,0.0023656355,0.011330963,0.016513526,0.0015088624,0.00847016,0.004582513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022554338,0.0008579268,0.000541829,0.0018860518,0.059473183,0.00941745,0.004748865,0.009235865,0.0007468606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010270933,0.0000011566061,0.000042854957,0.0000032791843,6.212709e-7,0.000011538535,0.00032891068,0.000051469717,0.000013790709,0.99883395,0.00025261202,0.0004588205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002338757,0.000016283522,0.0005082597,0.00009830781,0.000009728195,0.000042598207,0.0007423947,0.00047990034,0.00012055153,0.93297535,0.06496623,0.000017029966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023181744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024170304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97681826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014045846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016876586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10191023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251548378","doi":"10.7228/manchester/9781526114556.003.0011","title":"Speaking to power: mechanisms for judicial–executive dialogue","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Manchester University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Panacea (medicine); Power (physics); Political science; Executive power; Economic Justice; Law; Psychology; Politics; Medicine","score_opus":0.055280266297627854,"score_gpt":0.26228997408474153,"score_spread":0.20700970778711367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251548378","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008534474,0.005146228,0.018829951,0.03427411,0.0006391559,0.000056527093,0.000031575175,0.000105598956,0.93238246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8410829,0.00295312,0.00564652,0.009160331,0.0010640717,0.00023562036,0.000062061394,0.00029679923,0.13949853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869546,0.008546785,0.00028738438,0.0009685193,0.0020359722,0.001206628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866904,0.010066414,0.00073200365,0.0010251069,0.00088715524,0.0005989389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01314321,0.0006661602,0.00054186,0.0022968506,0.009510943,0.021206517,0.0027884091,0.007176369,0.018318623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02120822,0.000540388,0.00056985574,0.0024426698,0.037442923,0.020777864,0.008212369,0.00801323,0.0032757139],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032388448,0.0000047128374,0.00004147441,0.000014072,0.0000017072429,0.000037820693,0.009339044,0.000040032573,0.000048627844,0.9844057,0.0038627337,0.0022008838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002034551,0.0000104270675,0.00016919081,0.00017296667,0.000006275526,0.00006340089,0.011030601,0.0003133904,0.00020346935,0.7835046,0.20448987,0.000015431899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037787904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004153671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021206517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008630516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006687046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06950879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252259171","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198861973.003.0012","title":"What’s Wrong with (Some) Judges?<i>Carter</i>and the Invention of a Right to ‘Physician-Assisted Dying’","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.026514044808721427,"score_gpt":0.25269523489264556,"score_spread":0.22618119008392412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252259171","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006640665,0.016230917,0.0021003687,0.896593,0.006285676,0.000028814564,0.00003717045,0.000035923596,0.07204745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41954008,0.018637998,0.0040778834,0.5061905,0.009866385,0.000102503116,0.00006214733,0.00022173635,0.041300733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9722534,0.014039548,0.00083701115,0.002434275,0.0064994902,0.0039361706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9626455,0.022805292,0.0012468889,0.0008933679,0.009307425,0.0031015135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024846148,0.0003515916,0.0007906928,0.0015971259,0.019495316,0.018567769,0.0022695356,0.01152602,0.0045204856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058397327,0.0005805165,0.0006611144,0.001637249,0.04024938,0.013270891,0.0033433074,0.018655589,0.0008120702],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002420159,0.000017369424,0.00052312616,0.00013294777,0.000016672944,0.0001703039,0.015114474,0.0001486609,0.0002095527,0.7259174,0.24043572,0.01728958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031405812,0.00003274698,0.00080199505,0.0010198402,0.000034119897,0.00017538971,0.023300502,0.00046610873,0.0005694524,0.2738626,0.69953835,0.00016754935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16487075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1964217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16487075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024696438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019114392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32782215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253039063","doi":"10.21991/c9pq25","title":"Introduction","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Political science; Library science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.015768966203594546,"score_gpt":0.2637771714862154,"score_spread":0.24800820528262082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253039063","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00083938823,0.005708869,0.002316569,0.063255556,0.069737874,0.0001381485,0.0034143645,0.0007288202,0.8538604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00600777,0.0027281793,0.0009938834,0.014074852,0.012546909,0.00009626151,0.0023976609,0.00038352658,0.9607709],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800533,0.0002893911,0.00010135001,0.000444049,0.0008988859,0.00026109425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971854,0.0005556731,0.00013413053,0.00032965458,0.0012703227,0.0005248864],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016921086,0.0007124341,0.0006269648,0.0013722727,0.002601455,0.0076527945,0.0018796703,0.0040115183,0.49642727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007590685,0.00027298022,0.00061373477,0.0013253322,0.0011132212,0.0044989055,0.003166197,0.003497602,0.28355592],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017027814,0.000013563205,0.00013699371,0.000083483734,0.0000017119935,0.000028893008,0.00017330018,0.000025570214,0.000095288335,0.02413292,0.93990153,0.03538966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012849036,0.000003611108,0.00010220696,0.00004473352,5.2756377e-7,0.00001465119,0.00006203837,0.000009198398,0.000018307615,0.0017363249,0.9980052,0.0000019727736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002587444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004039929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49642727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022093873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030654778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7182854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254039495","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.1.81","title":"JUDICIAL REVIEW AT THE MARGINS: LAW, POWER, AND PREROGATIVE","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Law; Judicial review; Political science; Power (physics); Politics; Law and economics; Sociology; Physics","score_opus":0.011029377175947543,"score_gpt":0.2473415289119836,"score_spread":0.23631215173603606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254039495","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07170479,0.05642524,0.042934716,0.21586964,0.0017078338,0.00011536606,0.000059029237,0.00015233085,0.6110311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9644056,0.007089878,0.0018487329,0.0068429415,0.002046591,0.000080150356,0.000011043383,0.000059778875,0.017615195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.972569,0.014036722,0.00094940205,0.0019545516,0.007867634,0.0026226335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94471085,0.04185878,0.0036092612,0.00213198,0.00605794,0.0016310852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020180462,0.00031803563,0.0007075439,0.0020487674,0.008558658,0.022476662,0.0019162958,0.005788833,0.003996089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07963507,0.00046223906,0.0003328536,0.0018982693,0.042116497,0.012404504,0.004978699,0.0074767014,0.00087810186],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000101102205,0.000009056436,0.00025559205,0.000031673622,0.0000034759057,0.000052539875,0.003354161,0.0001395842,0.00014551454,0.9803469,0.003058869,0.012592523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002818092,0.000051545263,0.001180959,0.0003736609,0.000011772847,0.00012214856,0.0035439467,0.0004334751,0.00057573384,0.9041475,0.089489914,0.000041240968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063251024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064020525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022476662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008666755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01781994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10672575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254456953","doi":"10.3138/9781442689473","title":"The Transformation of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Transformation (genetics); Law; Political science; Biology; Genetics","score_opus":0.015583692636237238,"score_gpt":0.20283334756063387,"score_spread":0.18724965492439663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254456953","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047185037,0.032439653,0.0010288017,0.07246201,0.0017808016,0.00007081016,0.00077601423,0.00010304429,0.8441538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7880546,0.014062014,0.0010235178,0.012921121,0.00041510072,0.00003459639,0.00037092555,0.00009062669,0.18302754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99364614,0.0005192686,0.00007154561,0.0005600218,0.0033964964,0.0018065134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968491,0.00046772795,0.00010574407,0.00010433565,0.001767481,0.00070546183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012094054,0.000282449,0.00030228499,0.0022325646,0.021433504,0.010846709,0.0015148557,0.0021033378,0.0051161167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006258679,0.0003157134,0.00028133474,0.004886479,0.014455995,0.0019024116,0.002110462,0.004724955,0.0004967038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018670979,0.000013621111,0.001992507,0.000043291435,0.000010023827,0.00029720514,0.012996879,0.0005577244,0.00023781764,0.79722863,0.14213715,0.04446646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008461954,0.000010515618,0.011049435,0.000190462,0.00001122832,0.00011533391,0.0062436243,0.00053632923,0.00018724844,0.028379867,0.9532075,0.000060112987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9939283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99606943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21781649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21781649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22053836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90722203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254501228","doi":"10.3886/icpsr29121.v1","title":"Survey Study of 43 Supreme Court Common Law Judges on the Use of Foreign Law in Constitutional Rights Cases","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"ICPSR Data Holdings","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Common law; Precedent; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.23345560593437809,"score_gpt":0.35682623798594476,"score_spread":0.12337063205156668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254501228","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86532813,0.00088943745,0.00065106526,0.00071255426,0.000027239501,0.0003754396,0.12380886,0.000060171355,0.008147002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7651976,0.0015646528,0.0018015133,0.0010866665,0.00009215521,0.002506521,0.21914583,0.00009551496,0.00850947],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968855,0.0010224673,0.00036606184,0.0005208089,0.00075073773,0.00045448472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987255,0.0039664796,0.0034786784,0.00093471096,0.00325586,0.0011092474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027626823,0.00032692568,0.0005314762,0.0047993013,0.0016465788,0.0014049694,0.0008467432,0.0010049816,0.004933304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009355527,0.00048573653,0.0003097606,0.009031219,0.0006609647,0.0011194128,0.0017718729,0.0013008639,0.003977397],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024446426,0.00062172324,0.8140813,0.000747715,0.0001522911,0.00070768374,0.02430295,0.0003860389,0.0015858031,0.0017860254,0.12336281,0.032021195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068209374,0.000079215235,0.886838,0.00019662171,0.000038776936,0.0003778481,0.022332683,0.0005532254,0.00093518296,0.00024078054,0.088290654,0.00004881678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058841817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08260976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058841817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018532985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017212147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11699867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254822717","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511498893","title":"A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Constitutional theory; Constitutional law; Judicial review; Bill of rights; Sociology; Constitution; Politics","score_opus":0.02932983238594668,"score_gpt":0.24384590975720585,"score_spread":0.21451607737125916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254822717","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006363718,0.013461139,0.29388005,0.052704778,0.0014086334,0.0005852286,0.0003844777,0.0002709756,0.63094103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7357794,0.01219356,0.06606277,0.018654412,0.0077069784,0.002235614,0.0004305617,0.0002854262,0.15665121],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9750683,0.009171907,0.0010540657,0.004680347,0.008312027,0.0017134321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9731949,0.016348936,0.0015143167,0.0033473484,0.0049280324,0.0006665205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02300956,0.0007139814,0.0013335922,0.0057302387,0.004088959,0.0115293935,0.00414988,0.006766898,0.015133933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039274365,0.00067157217,0.0015545061,0.005222818,0.02293601,0.01313626,0.0029227063,0.005677082,0.0029788723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013392576,0.0000025014633,0.000027604083,0.000012954491,0.0000038228745,0.000008728843,0.00006568514,0.0002553115,0.0000072586304,0.99615496,0.0018499987,0.0016097788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017942964,0.000007962758,0.00010161108,0.000058874313,0.000008102968,0.000038870035,0.000047081572,0.001054369,0.00003376962,0.9608554,0.037767522,0.000008508554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010160413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073317057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02300956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011557812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016573776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12168759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254957963","doi":"10.3138/ijcs.2018-0004","title":"Morality Politics of Physician-Assisted Suicide: Comparing Canada and the United States","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Federalism; Politics; Public opinion; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.06838345814949211,"score_gpt":0.33459332473649106,"score_spread":0.26620986658699897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254957963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5939858,0.014207811,0.00032893493,0.08291515,0.00034690902,0.000050699706,0.00066800014,0.00002753899,0.30746913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901646,0.002318237,0.000110898225,0.0037127822,0.000038129412,0.000008478226,0.000083002,0.0000101929245,0.0035536403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99409074,0.0007660389,0.000093732175,0.00028941757,0.0020630853,0.0026969418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909958,0.002154429,0.0007944672,0.0001540674,0.004021997,0.001879155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002650884,0.00017872266,0.00045502107,0.0043384996,0.01895613,0.009919493,0.0013091804,0.0021527389,0.0051291618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010984254,0.00021339156,0.00040887212,0.0071139107,0.009703898,0.0012497975,0.002369121,0.0037140327,0.0001664303],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047850193,0.00018500394,0.05946369,0.00035264587,0.00018812317,0.0009237935,0.049239226,0.00199656,0.0010173413,0.7629799,0.059131745,0.06404343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001984635,0.00012677266,0.41459894,0.0014940726,0.00041473153,0.00031134827,0.1824289,0.0024006036,0.0011190962,0.027302386,0.36924332,0.00036138666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9955609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18493198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18493198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1873165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9453634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255184868","doi":"10.5040/9781509931125","title":"British and Canadian Public Law in Comparative Perspective","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Law; Political science; Comparative law; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06446384273474136,"score_gpt":0.2858677723629278,"score_spread":0.22140392962818645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255184868","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036639739,0.048225995,0.00023270021,0.035852645,0.00097024447,0.000013305768,0.0002777227,0.000034885874,0.9107286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34789357,0.060267538,0.00083616487,0.021708475,0.0013653532,0.00010469689,0.00060202373,0.0002125571,0.5670096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947031,0.0010187379,0.000088702276,0.00035492907,0.0017801332,0.0020543737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99741924,0.0009712468,0.000112810245,0.00016003595,0.00091662444,0.00041998134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020908166,0.0006870086,0.00077010784,0.007569593,0.024509871,0.02063394,0.002128906,0.005675492,0.036275268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055144755,0.00048356663,0.00040340482,0.01843869,0.020137923,0.0061813914,0.0028851181,0.004661654,0.0023179296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008271923,0.000011090889,0.00016620467,0.000078214565,0.000003614687,0.0000911678,0.0052559325,0.00008233434,0.000029197254,0.87584895,0.109006196,0.009418943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029418093,0.0000032850005,0.0010754192,0.00022575456,0.0000061077494,0.00004846259,0.0065713427,0.00005303664,0.00002499522,0.018891184,0.97308683,0.000010609088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96317846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97600454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16681437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16681437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07824022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96637726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255216585","doi":"10.3200/socp.149.3.284-286","title":"Authoritarian Personality and Rape Sentence Length in Conservative and Liberal States","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University","funders":"","keywords":"Conservatism; Authoritarianism; Sentence; State (computer science); Psychology; Punishment (psychology); Wright; Homicide; Criminology; Social psychology; Political science; Poison control; Law; Suicide prevention; History; Mathematics; Politics; Philosophy; Linguistics; Medicine; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.04883111009689248,"score_gpt":0.37507920793558486,"score_spread":0.32624809783869235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255216585","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996449,0.000011676898,0.000011507381,0.000026098038,0.0000011770011,0.0000011539806,0.000015946505,4.6355953e-7,0.00028704436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998109,0.0000076011365,0.000010951609,0.00000824394,0.0000020669074,0.0000013182569,0.000031319352,4.521804e-7,0.00012721492],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963725,0.00015625021,0.000032360495,0.000037671743,0.000060622726,0.0000756921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99223083,0.0025237694,0.0033980985,0.00028584021,0.0004030609,0.0011583145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010104548,0.00013828745,0.00014305743,0.000783945,0.0005142493,0.0007165113,0.0001567184,0.00024471042,0.0027644944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068329936,0.0001360379,0.00028234025,0.000443701,0.00051252724,0.00032296535,0.0007705755,0.0007470175,0.00025743782],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017788328,0.0001322143,0.9955195,0.0000034718582,0.000020786598,0.00005324912,0.0015855969,0.000057557252,0.00030429498,0.00012748147,0.000060986986,0.0019568831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034328186,0.00008340326,0.9986941,0.0000029507078,0.0000057484403,0.00005223555,0.0008489821,0.00012538895,0.00005325666,0.000051125273,0.0000767676,0.0000027096617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030250666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063953614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0030250666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043050374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025343458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0092481375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255305783","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511920806","title":"The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":183,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Commonwealth; Normative; Legislature; Law and economics; Appeal; Political science; Constitutional theory; Novelty; Relevance (law); Law; Democracy; Public administration; Constitutional law; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04322599364376026,"score_gpt":0.24203611177500073,"score_spread":0.19881011813124047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255305783","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011956367,0.0039447746,0.02528433,0.017005654,0.00030702548,0.00004434538,0.000053235166,0.000054557036,0.9413497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8234178,0.00561453,0.010465142,0.0051035164,0.0006837539,0.00028324116,0.00011315667,0.00010227875,0.1542166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99347526,0.0026485457,0.00019698721,0.0008497245,0.0019085037,0.00092099915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977469,0.0010604861,0.00016651684,0.0005074931,0.00033890613,0.00017975016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036315152,0.00023886761,0.00046040572,0.0016165731,0.004309578,0.009535776,0.0011826364,0.0026237345,0.0037237636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070284754,0.00029654798,0.0005072878,0.0021944821,0.032898646,0.009076726,0.0043164296,0.0049911705,0.0007142233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.8691078e-7,7.845774e-7,0.000014260392,0.0000021071965,3.4890232e-7,0.0000038348176,0.00020169062,0.00003492702,0.000007487936,0.9986412,0.00046317652,0.00062969414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037887437,0.000004111094,0.00012113204,0.000039429124,0.0000023340283,0.000023873114,0.00028211946,0.00022975336,0.000042629024,0.92334867,0.07589802,0.0000041155304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014060798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012213614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014060798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010342131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008403551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07503778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255395321","doi":"10.1093/icon/moz056","title":"Dialogic remedies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogic; Constitutionalism; Judicial review; Legislature; Law; Declaration; Maturity (psychological); Political science; Politics; Sociology; Law and economics; Democracy","score_opus":0.02327899340654451,"score_gpt":0.3129759707294164,"score_spread":0.2896969773228719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255395321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016666539,0.0021848308,0.08295734,0.052687753,0.0011772349,0.0004893007,0.00017147462,0.00037903446,0.8432864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9024545,0.00086417684,0.020770999,0.010552299,0.0007459228,0.0005166206,0.00009147534,0.000108047556,0.06389599],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97199076,0.01141323,0.0018503458,0.0048991423,0.0070022945,0.0028442931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97118044,0.015231818,0.002220186,0.005402706,0.004465046,0.001499841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0235301,0.00067555014,0.000949631,0.0020736745,0.010056143,0.00944159,0.0033206472,0.008856638,0.024842313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04378871,0.00050840847,0.001012738,0.0010265983,0.029508509,0.014716538,0.010237062,0.011139055,0.0019243393],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046585587,0.00001950664,0.000083666455,0.000029117717,0.0000038976054,0.000040087256,0.00092816306,0.0001629102,0.00007661772,0.991527,0.0022336582,0.004890782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041436746,0.00005891046,0.00028689604,0.00023755386,0.000024032575,0.000117503405,0.0013249203,0.0010390428,0.00063730445,0.8253117,0.17087853,0.00004212329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033862847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004767777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024842313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009260556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01433063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12444055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255463919","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511511226","title":"Judging Russia","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Legislature; State (computer science); Law; Administration (probate law); Politics; Reputation; Separation of powers; Federalism; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.03243524586203801,"score_gpt":0.22795417218483505,"score_spread":0.19551892632279705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255463919","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033618398,0.0041201008,0.0017451703,0.006451797,0.0007397057,0.000023989638,0.000056307876,0.00003874973,0.95320576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80044824,0.0036619867,0.0017745105,0.0015376703,0.00038582424,0.000031090793,0.00011087122,0.0000559088,0.19199386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998367,0.00071830326,0.000052228803,0.00021782683,0.00045618767,0.0001883993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990835,0.00050075125,0.00006394193,0.00005966658,0.00022020233,0.000071896655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013047247,0.00021749984,0.00029889567,0.001060894,0.0042624767,0.005348469,0.00042275304,0.0011267912,0.0068168137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034896568,0.00012514286,0.00020720197,0.0008005572,0.0048974776,0.0019841073,0.0014967303,0.0017132522,0.0013435967],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012380908,0.00001032713,0.0016653304,0.000082641665,0.0000059197428,0.00020737057,0.018308563,0.00030074164,0.00042838923,0.913097,0.025105275,0.04077603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067904093,0.000042015403,0.0058906884,0.00034522088,0.000013916203,0.00017710261,0.014852632,0.0003483327,0.00065893633,0.1069287,0.8707215,0.000014111902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006903923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0159994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006903923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032811172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027868608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023806274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255464247","doi":"10.1332/251569209x15664518847303","title":"Testing the ‘Veil of Ignorance’ Hypothesis in Constitutional Choice: A «Walk-Talk» Approach","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; Test (biology); Power (physics); Epistemology; Computer science; Veil of ignorance; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08404966784928031,"score_gpt":0.2902641150848055,"score_spread":0.20621444723552518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255464247","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37710175,0.00048307076,0.5382781,0.013735793,0.00016467646,0.0005733681,0.00029008155,0.00013444462,0.06923866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97497696,0.00007713274,0.022639805,0.00045987644,0.00006658091,0.00053897017,0.00006139433,0.000023482758,0.0011556998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9429176,0.045459807,0.00087468594,0.0030182204,0.00631687,0.0014127786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7701098,0.21299231,0.0060970415,0.0066814614,0.0030694285,0.0010500153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036565024,0.00062629324,0.0015271483,0.004407236,0.0049151354,0.008041916,0.0026962967,0.0052962173,0.00865197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12014925,0.0008994833,0.001804675,0.0031130426,0.030707633,0.016567428,0.007449141,0.006153018,0.0005954323],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015741446,0.00011700996,0.0022579462,0.000104578605,0.00008850781,0.0002397175,0.012168288,0.0019981118,0.0004883733,0.97179216,0.00044948235,0.010138461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081880695,0.00014888855,0.001484108,0.00007598408,0.00004226804,0.000089340916,0.006810162,0.010927557,0.00087071036,0.977253,0.002168821,0.00004731571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013917284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008247771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036565024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029079085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002178361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1933766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255801062","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.1.65","title":"THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF AN EXTERMINATORY LEGALITY: LAW AND THE HOLOCAUST","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Law; Nazism; The Holocaust; Political science; Judaism; Impossibility; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics; Theology","score_opus":0.011502320031210907,"score_gpt":0.2558543895657031,"score_spread":0.2443520695344922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255801062","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5790433,0.016262297,0.0033251368,0.09101899,0.00020283544,0.000018413146,0.00003256385,0.00004635258,0.31005013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994949,0.0011010375,0.00014365722,0.00055350055,0.000025668092,0.0000025890204,0.0000025534382,0.0000040847744,0.003217964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985514,0.0007023994,0.00003743346,0.000104868355,0.00025759544,0.0003462645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978928,0.001107513,0.0002882482,0.0001598047,0.0002482484,0.00030345912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002411863,0.00015209305,0.00023899703,0.00097263145,0.010305055,0.0091184955,0.0007799025,0.002360551,0.0011332408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037016037,0.0002573026,0.00013753261,0.000751836,0.09362506,0.004334925,0.0028543333,0.0031328888,0.000116281146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010264005,0.0000075880785,0.00091593,0.000014611374,0.0000019841311,0.00025150224,0.070951976,0.000068065594,0.00015570848,0.9230484,0.001279083,0.0032948602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004844166,0.00005910653,0.014662497,0.0003608177,0.000025340654,0.0007067763,0.19195443,0.0006849312,0.0008458807,0.61100495,0.17959452,0.0000524425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20604461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27772504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20604461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023218155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0138381375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40969062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256167964","doi":"10.22145/flr.45.4.11","title":"Lisa Burton Crawford The Rule of Law and the Australian Constitution - Janina Boughey Human Rights and Judicial Review in Australia and Canada: The Newest Despotism?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.05260209595554128,"score_gpt":0.3407976567241885,"score_spread":0.2881955607686472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256167964","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016105351,0.05712623,0.00022037675,0.91301966,0.007267372,0.00002217546,0.000039990162,0.000011614827,0.020682076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09534253,0.081262015,0.0012875183,0.6349206,0.016185401,0.0001354873,0.000057279547,0.00012296018,0.17068614],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98672897,0.0051549594,0.0007028528,0.0019157346,0.0039975992,0.001499995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94444215,0.036561973,0.0016802606,0.0013894709,0.010027111,0.0058989557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019565534,0.000618276,0.001432757,0.0026868645,0.020838832,0.017811345,0.0021190555,0.023867402,0.010699878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06342148,0.0014801973,0.00061432034,0.0030305176,0.024130091,0.012555687,0.0044901534,0.030291926,0.0018632768],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027471628,0.000044145556,0.00054432405,0.00015469326,0.000020969146,0.00011123399,0.0032872274,0.00009839046,0.00008863832,0.25548342,0.72660697,0.013532423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003233125,0.000017439603,0.002499502,0.00084795646,0.000020372867,0.000074590534,0.0028797446,0.00020934321,0.00010207634,0.057248462,0.93598026,0.00008807195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5936276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7672815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40637243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02943947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.088361286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8175313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280581348","doi":"10.1017/s0008423922000452","title":"The Overturning of<i>Roe v. Wade</i>: Are Abortion Rights in Canada Vulnerable?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Retrenchment; Abortion; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Politics; Context (archaeology); Human rights; Criminology; Sociology; Public administration; Geography","score_opus":0.01317008898947907,"score_gpt":0.25153655045683476,"score_spread":0.23836646146735568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280581348","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23434038,0.010200911,0.0011325172,0.48531312,0.00064841897,0.00006628731,0.00075093313,0.000049277278,0.26749808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9382926,0.0035991604,0.00035858346,0.0366208,0.00010965472,0.000014218475,0.00007347176,0.000024054727,0.020907514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99614394,0.0004765525,0.00006382753,0.0002517353,0.0011548937,0.0019091472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936487,0.0021932018,0.00045468254,0.00019502973,0.002085131,0.0014231966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029556002,0.00013637246,0.00029417107,0.0010663342,0.02020679,0.007895043,0.0014518946,0.0037320696,0.0041218204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008809568,0.0002557254,0.0002412896,0.0014170234,0.013169558,0.0018412232,0.0022754462,0.0068652313,0.00016640745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108673434,0.000033295182,0.022368098,0.00016072739,0.000039662616,0.0013868833,0.047988456,0.000550268,0.0016283755,0.7862485,0.099059135,0.040427946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043749347,0.000053327585,0.09492668,0.0008832012,0.00013708534,0.0005110319,0.105778486,0.001302161,0.0027452444,0.06980455,0.72349226,0.0003221246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9943845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10274574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10274574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14790818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.745476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285061047","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4123003","title":"Notwithstanding Judicial Specification: The Notwithstanding Clause within a Juridical Order","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Fulbright Canada; University of Toronto; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Law; Dependent clause; Political science; Linguistics; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.027201831946222575,"score_gpt":0.28929102272875545,"score_spread":0.2620891907825329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285061047","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17836608,0.0009173024,0.06377671,0.039544128,0.0006974397,0.00022349176,0.00031269572,0.00010292447,0.71605927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9730839,0.00019353243,0.006835979,0.0035514461,0.00039741685,0.00016536177,0.00007932162,0.000062282525,0.015630694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874901,0.0046378872,0.00069809484,0.0019275816,0.0027911295,0.0024552033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9775432,0.014131593,0.0017587964,0.0036523324,0.002368433,0.00054568535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013561812,0.00035025104,0.0013314887,0.0012635828,0.009910829,0.009466722,0.0029603562,0.009942871,0.008048626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036854677,0.00093745615,0.0009589682,0.0017825468,0.02480015,0.014533278,0.004339602,0.013497032,0.00096413505],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009470608,0.000007718281,0.000106483705,0.0000036177792,0.0000015200851,0.000014793861,0.00042810864,0.000045108765,0.000045964953,0.99801034,0.0006069096,0.0007200604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046719513,0.00003322335,0.00091285317,0.00004542575,0.000024226743,0.000041092124,0.0009161529,0.00088201195,0.0003451017,0.9839279,0.0128020095,0.000023311166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014493141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022328643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014493141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038455806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0101512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07172257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285086968","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v15n3p37","title":"Optimising the UK and Commonwealth Constitutions","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Political science; History; Law","score_opus":0.03740086280457678,"score_gpt":0.317281861095308,"score_spread":0.2798809982907312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285086968","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14123905,0.011109983,0.011015963,0.09494647,0.0037370531,0.00020916188,0.0005800514,0.00019681797,0.7369655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91486865,0.0015657467,0.011461754,0.0052886936,0.00045546406,0.000111030015,0.00026419933,0.00016628111,0.06581826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9841017,0.007622329,0.00080380525,0.0008446339,0.0043801214,0.0022473854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98174906,0.008006984,0.00097431644,0.0028436931,0.0049454374,0.0014804829],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017792027,0.0003178662,0.00041820324,0.0013585258,0.003045513,0.008427633,0.00085169746,0.005202809,0.014681288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06327395,0.00036415533,0.00027962972,0.0014798491,0.0038712753,0.006519815,0.00607156,0.003776226,0.001836483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015943777,0.000044958793,0.0013436209,0.000107194486,0.000020808679,0.00019318187,0.0028786033,0.004162258,0.00074709835,0.8911212,0.053083785,0.046137765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018008897,0.00013753046,0.009131324,0.00051351864,0.00008362561,0.00026063996,0.005510704,0.0046940083,0.0014823007,0.35379106,0.6240887,0.0001264589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044149566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07543717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044149566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013555364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014719206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09835148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285162040","doi":"10.47348/salj/v139/i2a4","title":"‘I beg to differ’: Are our courts too agreeable?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Dissent; Appeal; Law; Political science; Supreme court; Majority opinion","score_opus":0.030339795035629332,"score_gpt":0.2747571318407989,"score_spread":0.24441733680516958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285162040","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1265383,0.004685575,0.008607557,0.7075636,0.0042063496,0.00008421568,0.0001329596,0.00008177455,0.1480997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85992366,0.0012181825,0.0022990885,0.12435037,0.001295526,0.000063213694,0.00006823164,0.00007802351,0.010703683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.94740427,0.029503264,0.0019096503,0.0045089694,0.010927707,0.005746203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9506781,0.018845636,0.008219193,0.005302969,0.011070564,0.005883403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03381927,0.00029562574,0.0006354107,0.0015356635,0.012158814,0.012039086,0.0033692073,0.006979116,0.009168487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16040495,0.00041106244,0.00051403244,0.0019657866,0.033212826,0.016674249,0.005673232,0.01329128,0.0028000015],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108535605,0.00008867816,0.027322296,0.0002115352,0.000110699075,0.0014231609,0.19956768,0.00014074003,0.00092643633,0.5178239,0.15887949,0.093396805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062458304,0.000111746405,0.02364776,0.00086646865,0.000054497214,0.0017519146,0.21282355,0.00037263014,0.00079308107,0.30572212,0.45360726,0.00018653508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00884315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010395262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03381927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044913874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054527028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17885554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285201175","doi":"10.1093/icon/moac034","title":"The gatekeepers: Executive lawyers and the executive power in comparative constitutional law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Separation of powers; Constitution; Constitutional law; Law; Constitutionalism; Executive power; Political science; Power (physics); Executive order; Law and economics; Sociology; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.025721722348032324,"score_gpt":0.31601420501732164,"score_spread":0.2902924826692893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285201175","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55653965,0.004289099,0.01271608,0.03898272,0.00015985298,0.000066462104,0.00006857877,0.000042180785,0.38713536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99768853,0.00017422542,0.00038520974,0.00029192993,0.000019135547,0.00000731831,0.0000038818353,0.000006251843,0.0014235578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9817084,0.013666954,0.0004013914,0.0011711037,0.0014099834,0.0016421754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94047046,0.04650658,0.005292717,0.002919982,0.0030584256,0.0017517636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024644567,0.00015687941,0.00038727617,0.0030433482,0.0052044704,0.01097082,0.0013762055,0.002363622,0.0056425184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05479774,0.00029777328,0.00018476888,0.0028945229,0.065804616,0.009837572,0.0044397893,0.0026663078,0.00020458453],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002747729,0.000023575732,0.0053163557,0.00003798808,0.0000075062517,0.00011953521,0.02059853,0.00041503302,0.0001076114,0.9652262,0.000761063,0.00735918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000867065,0.0001402741,0.04876743,0.0007238194,0.000057893983,0.00019132887,0.07495466,0.0023703089,0.0014715573,0.75010693,0.1210196,0.00010943966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025759548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051408373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025759548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016707461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008826177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1303345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285359770","doi":"10.46692/9781447359531.007","title":"Politics as an alternative to constitutionalization","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law and economics; Political economy; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.04422593835022704,"score_gpt":0.3636964436512595,"score_spread":0.3194705053010325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285359770","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008321207,0.0074200775,0.09316984,0.060658332,0.0030845234,0.00012467979,0.0001497708,0.00033934368,0.82673216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8169663,0.003445273,0.022041695,0.017196437,0.0038420362,0.0005744757,0.00020519907,0.000690955,0.13503774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.976489,0.012325561,0.0010449615,0.0055015837,0.0024462037,0.0021926917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869126,0.0060534724,0.00083705387,0.004189441,0.0014054752,0.00060196826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02031206,0.00095964037,0.0011096584,0.0018032582,0.006951392,0.016108526,0.0023525637,0.006776709,0.016179197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019491415,0.00062987895,0.00129605,0.001809049,0.072737046,0.023323253,0.012118331,0.016391143,0.00300522],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023482826,0.0000013454569,0.000012335455,0.0000066065545,9.014261e-7,0.000004880333,0.00032495646,0.000033422086,0.000019347188,0.9982697,0.00047822934,0.00084591034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011505546,0.000014879205,0.00005229629,0.000062711275,0.000004181786,0.000031962594,0.00038841795,0.00016308938,0.00013497974,0.8965561,0.10256846,0.000011463193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005606978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028725008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02031206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009823054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00810622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.107421696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285389506","doi":"10.1017/cls.2022.7","title":"The Elusive Quest for French on the Bench: Bilingualism Scores for Canadian Supreme Court Justices, 1985–2013","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Neuroscience of multilingualism; Normative; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Agreement; Construct (python library); Sociology; Psychology; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.02904320012190632,"score_gpt":0.28118169998378995,"score_spread":0.25213849986188364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285389506","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9648264,0.00040186336,0.000121878016,0.0011880939,0.000055022392,0.00007880256,0.006503894,0.00002579797,0.026798315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918812,0.00018918802,0.00020246493,0.00006843395,0.000013959518,0.000025756537,0.0031467983,0.000009324291,0.004462962],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976185,0.00010184186,0.000106624975,0.00018371141,0.0013368037,0.0006524449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865182,0.0006370773,0.001786695,0.00021230511,0.0078065014,0.0030390967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027471373,0.00040600085,0.00037904762,0.007371161,0.0057309065,0.0025180469,0.0016407539,0.00069139194,0.0065162852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010553935,0.00024158864,0.0006217186,0.0052295486,0.0021875228,0.0008692026,0.0016961311,0.0013558788,0.0006083458],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020191526,0.00011848769,0.9286133,0.00012250611,0.000090784604,0.0002744589,0.014862785,0.00040278802,0.00048829423,0.003412748,0.021137165,0.030274766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071364525,0.000019585954,0.9855715,0.000046168396,0.000014235203,0.000041633644,0.005158364,0.00022362605,0.00013895881,0.00015532148,0.008595461,0.00002787253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9891713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048200827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048200827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05142692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34972316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285721789","doi":"10.7202/1088749ar","title":"À la découverte des configurations de la légalité","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Sociologie et sociétés","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.38293153198089747,"score_gpt":0.5030726552960203,"score_spread":0.12014112331512283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285721789","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1268523,0.018556377,0.024836907,0.16797233,0.0010653505,0.000045292574,0.000113783135,0.00011062885,0.6604471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97640616,0.002529451,0.0034161087,0.0018018263,0.00022756676,0.000035903457,0.000025610738,0.000055384386,0.015501942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99087584,0.0054290355,0.0002757248,0.0011009026,0.0015443811,0.0007740833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869501,0.005778252,0.0018167915,0.001663428,0.0026163096,0.0011751428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011801019,0.00035175335,0.00043841611,0.0017357972,0.009679006,0.014468337,0.0013395471,0.0037802337,0.0067582605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022811277,0.00045722094,0.00038089938,0.0017801455,0.088998355,0.017657146,0.008029252,0.008974303,0.00077734416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006622861,0.0000057476136,0.00025401617,0.000014415653,0.0000023204768,0.000036672307,0.016547967,0.00009215787,0.00007305341,0.97515124,0.0018073515,0.0060084537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001867786,0.000020101772,0.0018511445,0.00017799548,0.000006232479,0.0001416428,0.01861863,0.00038584584,0.00033620326,0.8582678,0.1201402,0.00003563177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02196575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021573588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02196575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008737814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011937684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06339759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289022272","doi":"","title":"Les rapports entre cours suprêmes et législateurs dans les systèmes constitutionnels de common law - Recherches comparées sur la troisième voie du constitutionnalisme et la protection renouvelée des droits et libertés (États-Unis, Canada, Royaume-Uni)","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Commonwealth; Legislature; Law; Political science; Human rights; Common law; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.04179212865284661,"score_gpt":0.2753387836118521,"score_spread":0.2335466549590055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289022272","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6865085,0.0067900876,0.02906084,0.011681943,0.0001415297,0.00010916614,0.0004835211,0.00011651402,0.2651079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899581,0.0005583768,0.0021221663,0.00012533314,0.000023098164,0.000036208585,0.000064008105,0.000031447642,0.0070812553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9825362,0.008819302,0.0005912611,0.0019404325,0.004157943,0.0019549483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.958327,0.03166756,0.0028145001,0.0017999407,0.0045019593,0.0008891389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017240426,0.00028791168,0.0008439867,0.0052453764,0.009868178,0.018505303,0.0014660995,0.001682531,0.0071810656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049910765,0.00073914847,0.00066908926,0.008648732,0.021825055,0.006322436,0.002979317,0.00330589,0.00035682163],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051069455,0.000012598623,0.006775735,0.00005752883,0.00003258346,0.000036848975,0.02531118,0.0006508993,0.00034446202,0.9569199,0.000634315,0.0091728605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016977038,0.00016161644,0.28296247,0.0006688658,0.00041606344,0.00019771315,0.085997395,0.009072062,0.005335097,0.48329547,0.13149099,0.00023250625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40428418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41253006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5957158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030467413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028239472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.803862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289718828","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198861577.003.0004","title":"Pipelines to High Courts","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.03976459824294891,"score_gpt":0.29157568817270363,"score_spread":0.2518110899297547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289718828","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09524487,0.0011992505,0.0016418687,0.005580377,0.00009421651,0.000048299196,0.0004051079,0.000055344684,0.8957307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8879022,0.0010008685,0.000722334,0.0013289533,0.000112354,0.000035275752,0.00022601071,0.00003555995,0.10863641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998243,0.00048888533,0.000028824501,0.00018064123,0.00045682298,0.00060192216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973779,0.0010301754,0.00025826402,0.00020265092,0.0004231936,0.0007079441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011051986,0.00013240623,0.00019431948,0.0020613973,0.004414556,0.0047232867,0.0006061424,0.0008056194,0.043273345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056493715,0.00017404792,0.00019510629,0.0025829806,0.004805564,0.003106203,0.0025094622,0.001989828,0.0020410584],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046704357,0.00008662014,0.009672428,0.00007755003,0.0000025950687,0.00041792836,0.014526903,0.00028450365,0.00020039412,0.88295066,0.041241463,0.050492078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017103195,0.00011209326,0.047343757,0.0005444123,0.000010119748,0.00060877047,0.049774896,0.0010964904,0.0006123281,0.15615992,0.7436961,0.000023965156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039917253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.090879776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043273345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058828085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053275763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14476383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289718829","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198861577.001.0001","title":"Reimagining the Judiciary","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.038434298363162,"score_gpt":0.30059895276014564,"score_spread":0.26216465439698367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289718829","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047954798,0.018128797,0.00249126,0.037543472,0.0014942571,0.00003063084,0.00024197678,0.00005036281,0.8920645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7097207,0.014155427,0.0027532964,0.0066689947,0.0009622966,0.000054424465,0.00040264387,0.00009187961,0.26519036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739873,0.0012663623,0.000043008957,0.00019544827,0.0008354652,0.0002609271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974776,0.0016094402,0.00015516,0.00022367986,0.00036310978,0.00017096892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015040253,0.00020168356,0.00026093793,0.000964344,0.0035902641,0.007156711,0.000725428,0.00094423484,0.007682179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004341211,0.00013012807,0.00011509634,0.0018415563,0.0061227987,0.0048256624,0.0020178594,0.0028259717,0.00095050264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025990896,0.000042837768,0.0028964845,0.00015563382,0.000005570676,0.00012333388,0.021779234,0.00045101013,0.00036219624,0.69438344,0.15109895,0.12867528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027445824,0.00001895907,0.0033613641,0.0003550486,0.0000039317106,0.00007096675,0.017885923,0.0003247323,0.0004791195,0.046268843,0.93121934,0.000009001868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026475094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06259454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026475094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008934314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051572323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06482333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289925927","doi":"10.3138/cjh-57-2-2021-0126","title":"Lynn Gehl, <i>Gehl v Canada: Challenging Sex Discrimination in the Indian Act</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of History","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.030536616576125244,"score_gpt":0.2438984929021764,"score_spread":0.21336187632605116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289925927","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018746842,0.04047568,0.00038443593,0.52181625,0.0042700097,0.00013389268,0.0015373677,0.00012575295,0.41250974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23177119,0.04301544,0.00081531896,0.22524545,0.0012392977,0.00014429096,0.0006715162,0.0002844192,0.49681312],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990127,0.00016061758,0.000032522355,0.00007841871,0.00032565734,0.00039004485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984854,0.0005508648,0.00008051329,0.000025170772,0.000447905,0.00041027274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009550087,0.00046276013,0.00038398412,0.0012531077,0.022243368,0.0070910244,0.002312636,0.0065130233,0.020808531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035564022,0.00036239083,0.00028417257,0.0025553082,0.0055487356,0.003382256,0.0019910946,0.005653091,0.0025811165],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001179133,0.00002217581,0.001817002,0.00012226452,0.0000063476864,0.00045867806,0.030265504,0.00006088664,0.00011974761,0.05415821,0.90159875,0.011358623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010349406,0.000009714989,0.009663867,0.0006278693,0.000017055103,0.00028237957,0.13620174,0.00011170506,0.0003071267,0.006172253,0.84654284,0.00005303483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9682413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9890027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031758726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02802869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06200339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2033633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4291237217","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjac033","title":"From the Ivory Tower to the Courtroom: Cooperative Federalism in the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Federalism; Law; Political science; New Federalism; Supreme Court Decisions; Majority opinion; Term (time); Jurisdiction; Constitution; Separation of powers; Original jurisdiction; Government (linguistics); Politics","score_opus":0.026826196433593217,"score_gpt":0.2686306425056153,"score_spread":0.2418044460720221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4291237217","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4746232,0.005524259,0.002771982,0.056013666,0.00031907947,0.00007012207,0.00060519116,0.000057613386,0.46001488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99189067,0.00044233838,0.00024446982,0.0017054543,0.00003300097,0.000007562607,0.000040174073,0.000009687613,0.005626749],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98866934,0.0019564296,0.00020052891,0.0008071372,0.0043801633,0.003986452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853373,0.005115392,0.00088285765,0.00043418535,0.005876265,0.0023540535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052763936,0.00016600301,0.00040355773,0.003451755,0.030377662,0.014300353,0.001981436,0.0027929607,0.00451629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0187601,0.00028730158,0.00028432027,0.006375044,0.019992175,0.003197268,0.003337578,0.004753318,0.00018341189],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035435794,0.000025934283,0.011653367,0.00004884803,0.000021035657,0.00048252277,0.034134597,0.0009293516,0.00031501756,0.91337115,0.025582017,0.013400728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066848734,0.000077683275,0.1327007,0.0011794667,0.00016160056,0.00033946164,0.1375331,0.0049108653,0.0017040162,0.14738134,0.5735736,0.00037128697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99076337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99618584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1988665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1988665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1819824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9292013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4292307678","doi":"10.1111/raju.12359","title":"Raz and the Rule of (Authoritative) Law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Rule of law; Law; Work (physics); Position (finance); Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Business; Physics","score_opus":0.018574767319440497,"score_gpt":0.28986633409585044,"score_spread":0.2712915667764099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4292307678","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.073078424,0.0049759047,0.07403176,0.048674174,0.00065156975,0.00006826552,0.00020914563,0.00021264456,0.79809815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850758,0.00061953545,0.003913531,0.0013432689,0.00044479262,0.000024923933,0.000029775982,0.00003222703,0.008516168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98782057,0.0055462164,0.0006989351,0.0013211553,0.0037513643,0.00086176937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97789055,0.0121569345,0.002391166,0.0028294914,0.0040017273,0.00073016767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009574382,0.00024844342,0.0006719964,0.0025414738,0.0036945832,0.0074979416,0.0014101926,0.0029415651,0.0046015014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023211196,0.0002988452,0.0005819269,0.0016733086,0.028675914,0.006849384,0.0032126368,0.00458113,0.00095488364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030147662,0.000002092889,0.00005114114,0.0000057731763,0.0000010164434,0.000008009371,0.00026797116,0.00005069455,0.000024604971,0.9985384,0.0003773329,0.00066999724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009960876,0.000009868282,0.00019114636,0.000024274848,0.0000044697936,0.00003320723,0.00018232773,0.00030353645,0.00009946594,0.98206425,0.017070413,0.000007170555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033754846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002656894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009574382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030788702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002698425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0506348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294308144","doi":"10.1093/he/9780191948909.003.0064","title":"Re Resolution to Amend the Constitution of Canada [1981] 1 SCR 753, also known as the Patriation Reference, Supreme Court of Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03299280417196766,"score_gpt":0.22286751207730326,"score_spread":0.18987470790533562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294308144","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027861854,0.011093429,0.00080774445,0.04180295,0.0034624375,0.00022459975,0.0015414933,0.00008826635,0.9381929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.064928494,0.007648111,0.0020744435,0.051526576,0.00091403787,0.00022142552,0.0008768882,0.00015310517,0.8716569],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924132,0.0006067136,0.00023399337,0.0005507832,0.0043405457,0.0018547736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977235,0.00046023628,0.00010994557,0.00013306474,0.0013896653,0.00018355246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030089414,0.00097007497,0.00057614176,0.002611702,0.015861133,0.006786161,0.002911796,0.013070693,0.013873105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00810062,0.00079259236,0.0007634647,0.004064131,0.007928639,0.0018926024,0.001890377,0.008656723,0.0030659297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009155247,0.000014079482,0.00021434666,0.000045470973,0.00000575309,0.00019603982,0.0016805612,0.00023182842,0.00017501312,0.38699332,0.60374075,0.006693714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016490574,0.0000062059726,0.0013933855,0.00022378586,0.000011243964,0.00005800692,0.00089758734,0.00011746352,0.0002039944,0.010763588,0.9862655,0.000042807125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9717082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98738843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9166368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08336317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12639853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6048449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294811563","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0116","title":"What is purposive interpretation?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Presupposition; Doctrine; Epistemology; Nonprobability sampling; Constitutional interpretation; Set (abstract data type); Law; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.010967684414629992,"score_gpt":0.24340022694349536,"score_spread":0.23243254252886536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294811563","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012367264,0.023554001,0.15369563,0.33518317,0.005621991,0.00013934042,0.0002473622,0.00024437264,0.4689468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8686254,0.013685276,0.03791069,0.045298655,0.010304753,0.0006119004,0.00036273367,0.00055721763,0.022643492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95189124,0.033758223,0.0015362728,0.0039048286,0.00659746,0.0023118935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94755,0.037310116,0.0022223827,0.0064672153,0.0051463083,0.0013039222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039046142,0.0009997798,0.001972072,0.003242784,0.009320477,0.018264217,0.003751252,0.007403921,0.008582604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050412554,0.000871354,0.00154811,0.0042451755,0.08283352,0.03577776,0.0065935156,0.012170182,0.0021875666],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005606349,0.0000067182064,0.00010940084,0.000036679972,0.0000052001737,0.000037017788,0.0015763303,0.000051340714,0.000011509725,0.9919333,0.0027890499,0.0034379163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006483866,0.000004595856,0.00007197675,0.000112287176,0.000004054444,0.000059903,0.0010812902,0.00018224669,0.000048763257,0.9737249,0.024695389,0.0000081223425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058849114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003730311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039046142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009109487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009639436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2064982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298282242","doi":"10.3138/9781442602458","title":"The Charter Revolution and the Court Party","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.018208726089084547,"score_gpt":0.2133911515406289,"score_spread":0.19518242545154435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4298282242","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006470253,0.0076121464,0.0009585149,0.032518517,0.0009921172,0.000019349183,0.000041026105,0.000024387316,0.95136374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52831453,0.0054663992,0.00078248203,0.013885291,0.0012874546,0.000087061555,0.000069668306,0.00008258905,0.45002455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958312,0.0013530314,0.000044018878,0.0004156514,0.0012635438,0.0010924976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984779,0.0006707961,0.000088523004,0.00014489547,0.00040035738,0.00021752424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002847845,0.00033515357,0.0003613123,0.0013127333,0.016506674,0.012233551,0.0009321386,0.003297789,0.00832105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053058844,0.00021641362,0.00030182424,0.0017581668,0.025494866,0.004236159,0.0024951464,0.0069300025,0.0011703566],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021643018,0.0000032401058,0.00002216344,0.000002897385,4.1421407e-7,0.000009376738,0.0009799593,0.000033125278,0.000011878643,0.9856721,0.0113321785,0.0019303517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016359309,0.000008392981,0.00044489893,0.00008600586,0.0000039631836,0.00001789021,0.0022519939,0.0002090083,0.00010250734,0.34227106,0.65457284,0.00001512885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29769912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3348107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29769912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03717592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031303227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59193265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4299717491","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511576713","title":"Criminal Disenfranchisement in an International Perspective","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Constitutionalism; Law; Politics; Voting; Prison; Human rights; Doctrine; Criminal law; Democracy","score_opus":0.03248200771265298,"score_gpt":0.27420566769986043,"score_spread":0.24172365998720746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4299717491","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065983455,0.009904907,0.00032749143,0.008555882,0.0003267038,0.000005774057,0.000017136332,0.0000074473996,0.97425634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7186866,0.041664705,0.0006786853,0.0077049257,0.0017892217,0.00008837938,0.000092242626,0.00006981916,0.22922544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988206,0.00038090406,0.000040441446,0.00015816336,0.0002232619,0.00037659693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992341,0.00032282807,0.00008055123,0.00007206436,0.00017151551,0.000118957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097463,0.00042110757,0.00035476123,0.0019730858,0.00572022,0.009785978,0.00044982607,0.0018186374,0.007784771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018295203,0.0001631374,0.0002845399,0.0022066673,0.008689226,0.0037683162,0.0025130014,0.005218811,0.00069275725],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002581783,0.000011781478,0.0001779236,0.000017250597,0.00000196331,0.000048616934,0.0034244836,0.00005820661,0.000030860923,0.98309004,0.00608591,0.007050278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006168659,0.000020798072,0.001787176,0.0005386274,0.000014301096,0.00018940282,0.010659775,0.0001752736,0.00018016585,0.16676335,0.8196535,0.00001134853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011093284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0213865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011093284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004847001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033624843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035167634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4300444709","doi":"","title":"ENGINEERING CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGE – A Comparative Perspective on Europe, Canada and the USA – Routledge Research in Constitutional Law, pp. 478., 2013. Published by: Routledge and the Taylor &amp; Francis Group Edited by: prof. dr. sc. XENOPHON CONTIADES","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hrčak Portal of scientific journals of Croatia (University Computing Centre)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07755330925632452,"score_gpt":0.3045290900596362,"score_spread":0.22697578080331166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4300444709","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037923943,0.29386577,0.0035138414,0.07100807,0.0005999584,0.000045682707,0.0003938757,0.00005032301,0.5925985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8444814,0.11328295,0.0019749992,0.0050848685,0.00022352647,0.0000408183,0.0002406084,0.00009493363,0.034575786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956039,0.0014790964,0.00012415682,0.00030007624,0.0015229193,0.00096975884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962978,0.0018514821,0.00026128313,0.0001867488,0.0010768586,0.00032584698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036423183,0.0004098184,0.00049366924,0.0052625043,0.0114041865,0.01576154,0.0015546201,0.0034141336,0.0060361335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073610367,0.00026452597,0.0003059603,0.014754869,0.035034552,0.005690384,0.0024861111,0.0025882132,0.0003457133],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011648681,0.000015489157,0.0006539492,0.0001267944,0.000011101392,0.00010066793,0.017223477,0.0005302144,0.00007369168,0.93032783,0.020704862,0.030220155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011861701,0.0000150662645,0.014574345,0.0016977909,0.000033037584,0.00013559393,0.06753398,0.0005630873,0.00035897872,0.18287587,0.73214597,0.0000544532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9112327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9591786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10674837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10674837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10875494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7745173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4300920754","doi":"10.3138/9781442684980-009","title":"6 The Supreme Court of Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02502128237963722,"score_gpt":0.2058027702572974,"score_spread":0.18078148787766019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4300920754","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006775949,0.023765232,0.0004752842,0.06580088,0.0015694248,0.00005537694,0.0011663442,0.00006016839,0.9003314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17486806,0.008063777,0.00070175296,0.019326918,0.0005394093,0.0000884492,0.00032547407,0.00012793939,0.7959583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99625266,0.00036832967,0.00007531203,0.0004323893,0.0013313742,0.001539947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976666,0.00050865795,0.000067737186,0.00015427188,0.0011141216,0.0004885066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015817928,0.0008272522,0.00096956396,0.002140461,0.028007546,0.014785095,0.0023134318,0.011907518,0.039080262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062651746,0.0011017113,0.00060771353,0.003936514,0.0077594533,0.003276273,0.0022145936,0.010090925,0.0026735768],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011794107,0.000010308353,0.0002479253,0.00003433939,0.00000657427,0.00007881939,0.0011373364,0.00015832814,0.000036995705,0.7647559,0.22838905,0.005132624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018433964,0.000005249908,0.0015232902,0.00024502396,0.000019944018,0.00002933712,0.001691904,0.0002485291,0.000099412355,0.058184184,0.93789583,0.000038930102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9863121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99432546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8942856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10571436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17653245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4301054014","doi":"10.54648/erpl2009024","title":"The Legal Power","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Review of Private Law/Revue européenne de droit privé/Europäische Zeitschrift für Privatrecht","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.016885968433102607,"score_gpt":0.28577985198950434,"score_spread":0.26889388355640176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4301054014","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00824099,0.0068725073,0.023739593,0.046052516,0.0006733144,0.000054667576,0.000108205895,0.000049195027,0.914209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91349995,0.0044714115,0.004958018,0.010908332,0.0019246311,0.00019045887,0.0001103439,0.00006142272,0.0638755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99193394,0.0030927993,0.0003427412,0.0013341474,0.002549835,0.0007465658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99186665,0.004068493,0.0006248835,0.0013176897,0.0016282331,0.00049403746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072394125,0.00048324573,0.0004961118,0.0019016005,0.004925062,0.01155236,0.0014623223,0.0052015334,0.0106188925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010156092,0.00031831532,0.00044405728,0.0014670457,0.06821955,0.010724787,0.0059370687,0.0056683733,0.0018810476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.6266247e-7,0.0000015967329,0.000025052583,0.000009396332,6.268102e-7,0.00000657375,0.00028430848,0.00001735006,0.000015062927,0.99743265,0.0010284189,0.0011783395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010095111,0.000012021361,0.00023769937,0.0002062037,0.000005974434,0.00009940596,0.00068504375,0.00014508296,0.00015489357,0.85872555,0.13971095,0.0000072247576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067219324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046471255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01155236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007841022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009410664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056890845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4302430853","doi":"10.36745/ijca.463","title":"Book Review: Juries, Lay Judges, and Mixed Courts","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Court Administration","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Politics; Law; Public opinion; Political science; Public administration; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.02641709906142968,"score_gpt":0.3510344072385747,"score_spread":0.324617308177145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4302430853","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000043562064,0.979487,0.000052819953,0.0065736375,0.0065512983,0.000017503213,0.000120649674,0.000008055536,0.007145391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00096821145,0.9622137,0.00015478232,0.010597161,0.008514266,0.0000813617,0.00024944547,0.000016993587,0.017204065],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859315,0.00039297287,0.00015581574,0.00014072924,0.00063174684,0.00008555783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941989,0.003223149,0.00054658175,0.000081918566,0.001639044,0.0003102591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001435677,0.0007502922,0.0019997186,0.0040120557,0.0007232205,0.0035000974,0.0014100141,0.00289562,0.032407142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00810533,0.00058807636,0.0006064481,0.008670368,0.0012337933,0.0022222658,0.0009977563,0.003454101,0.011730071],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035140467,0.000017342882,0.000064604734,0.0046222825,0.00003100833,0.00002616166,0.00004115348,0.000049630533,0.0000350044,0.002335766,0.9271941,0.065547906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028394154,0.000020739222,0.0005915525,0.008023097,0.000034253677,0.00012936982,0.000052277963,0.00001246795,0.000013251764,0.00095243973,0.9901334,0.000008768844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010204565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026546827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032407142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028340628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005850105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10841268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306822587","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0056","title":"How important are the groundbreaking cases in administrative law?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Administrative law; Deference; Political science; Supreme Court Decisions; Standard of review; Concurring opinion; Judicial review; Context (archaeology); Precedent; Majority opinion; Certiorari; Judicial opinion; Court of record; Original jurisdiction; History","score_opus":0.042128945546095524,"score_gpt":0.2677486533160273,"score_spread":0.2256197077699318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306822587","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32234207,0.029647162,0.0030761664,0.3288652,0.0016453078,0.00010477578,0.00028644572,0.00007226237,0.3139606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97951645,0.0035738389,0.00042450344,0.008850618,0.0004066519,0.000013572397,0.000044633896,0.00002463127,0.007144945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9733473,0.00672067,0.0006799628,0.0023019756,0.007994102,0.008955989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9380242,0.034845077,0.007822221,0.0022372154,0.009268177,0.0078030205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017086519,0.00030942942,0.000547639,0.0038855318,0.021231994,0.02384061,0.0024481856,0.005781776,0.0044005327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.086546615,0.0006255726,0.00061881455,0.0050080097,0.0458879,0.015250204,0.004186251,0.012214103,0.00045254832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009336318,0.00011733787,0.030104727,0.00024416394,0.000049279988,0.0016057094,0.07765096,0.0006549516,0.0009220628,0.7671627,0.034904465,0.08649027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041965774,0.00014659374,0.23583083,0.0009429716,0.00013355304,0.0010929646,0.11389215,0.00063798594,0.0017050934,0.22481416,0.42053685,0.00022490474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67526114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.77383214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67526114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06732442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053669505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6533026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306855984","doi":"10.1017/9781009158541.009","title":"The Unconstitutional State of Affairs Doctrine","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Adjudication; Legislature; Dispose pattern; Political science; State (computer science); Law; Politics; Government (linguistics); Separation of powers; Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024745137551570665,"score_gpt":0.2221999240245763,"score_spread":0.19745478647300563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306855984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00425028,0.0023537192,0.023158928,0.018742826,0.0007794079,0.00005122938,0.00011366483,0.000060794635,0.9504891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70661205,0.003151307,0.018161051,0.01896825,0.0023382371,0.00072243833,0.00020728668,0.0001897008,0.24964966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99163604,0.0030810328,0.0003358893,0.0014136254,0.0027635335,0.00076988945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99570954,0.002167027,0.00024514415,0.0009608745,0.00077243266,0.00014491355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076649063,0.00045738395,0.00070810685,0.0010789622,0.004436928,0.008801498,0.0022572298,0.0069530145,0.008684306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011064723,0.00050609943,0.00071818236,0.0008826131,0.027141768,0.007565342,0.0038871954,0.01192076,0.002914518],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.904764e-7,0.0000012569182,0.000008103213,0.0000027946542,5.096306e-7,0.0000065906684,0.00007870981,0.000017104057,0.000012037996,0.99831116,0.0009889699,0.00057195936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000809881,0.0000068905397,0.00004606563,0.000056863933,0.0000054162456,0.000044841683,0.00009221982,0.00031945374,0.00015747362,0.9140842,0.08517191,0.000006578349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029624247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025856737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008801498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003853639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006376742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040536344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309309855","doi":"10.5380/rinc.v9i2.86385","title":"Does Brazil need a notwithstanding clause?","year":2022,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Investigações Constitucionais","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Supreme court; Political science; Judicial activism; Raising (metalworking); Law; Democracy; Style (visual arts); Legislative process; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; History; Engineering","score_opus":0.03916241969176692,"score_gpt":0.29943269193167044,"score_spread":0.2602702722399035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309309855","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31438437,0.013159134,0.0042053796,0.24005592,0.00063784834,0.00012702508,0.00050800625,0.00006293657,0.42685938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798508,0.0033484357,0.00078920095,0.007861481,0.00012207308,0.000021769547,0.00010576883,0.000016813188,0.007883547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873513,0.00033157296,0.000047433547,0.00019964424,0.00035008998,0.00033619854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99783796,0.00095317326,0.00031944606,0.00017802296,0.0005078348,0.00020355229],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021864532,0.00015274168,0.00036393234,0.0006378672,0.003997906,0.0042780624,0.00057694514,0.0018815276,0.0054892534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067606,0.00015239835,0.00026254452,0.001160008,0.0051641655,0.003510639,0.0011849542,0.0018531336,0.00038151388],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012381335,0.000017468243,0.005020154,0.00014402562,0.0000071617983,0.00037448257,0.006109953,0.0000745984,0.0007526154,0.9664051,0.004808069,0.016273959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038002952,0.000079881676,0.043552253,0.0013116659,0.000079398334,0.00066803856,0.034375664,0.0007264745,0.00089067855,0.25346953,0.66474,0.00006835328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15761897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26893568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15761897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066872234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010524228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31340307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310256116","doi":"10.1007/s41020-022-00183-8","title":"Examining the living metaphor in the Indian Constitution","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jindal Global Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Constitution; Supreme court; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Constitutionalism; Doctrine; Democracy; Sociology; Law; Constitution of India; Political science; Epistemology; Politics; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.060957793058452836,"score_gpt":0.327253691719669,"score_spread":0.26629589866121617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310256116","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36483523,0.006330729,0.006018765,0.017877033,0.00049818784,0.00005029988,0.000057535173,0.000049890838,0.6042824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962441,0.0005955017,0.0003421567,0.000521129,0.000031519015,0.000008789788,0.00000756597,0.000007627849,0.0022415796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993874,0.0044891513,0.00010725237,0.00019899961,0.0008270849,0.0005035096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930688,0.0052631414,0.00052346237,0.00034052343,0.0005737038,0.00023034157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051739933,0.00020337578,0.00029229125,0.0030709929,0.008138689,0.0067218076,0.00095164665,0.0013352958,0.0033511112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008091047,0.00013628197,0.00021328272,0.0036932547,0.032230113,0.0036232998,0.004190159,0.0034718798,0.0001824687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009795248,0.000016982018,0.00067411386,0.00006482162,0.0000039526326,0.0002892136,0.08699355,0.00012844049,0.00040539238,0.9043204,0.0019589234,0.0051344214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002124649,0.00009460764,0.010983384,0.00088047754,0.00005458348,0.0010115,0.39431342,0.001212983,0.0013267823,0.223352,0.36664847,0.00010046641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03090782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05253163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03090782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007262623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053715846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061455786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310495315","doi":"10.51952/9781529222036.ch066","title":"Access to Justice","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Bristol University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07831575039139946,"score_gpt":0.2800252914260443,"score_spread":0.20170954103464486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310495315","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00067877746,0.0032158159,0.0015050801,0.0054560425,0.00050035305,0.00003060644,0.000085512525,0.000038289698,0.98848957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13264969,0.008699589,0.0026714471,0.013212973,0.0013594605,0.0001948488,0.0002927,0.00022557763,0.84069365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956245,0.0011956206,0.00021199106,0.0006903953,0.0013396963,0.00093776756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802434,0.00065780577,0.00010240337,0.0003859359,0.0004958796,0.00033357443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002186603,0.0005201966,0.000499918,0.0014075836,0.0063789813,0.010601188,0.0014592744,0.0049641924,0.07354932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063461396,0.0002779957,0.00043239523,0.0015931603,0.013875492,0.009502448,0.007963581,0.005593815,0.01587394],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020154805,0.000008946861,0.000058732363,0.000040225932,0.000001404197,0.00004526382,0.0020238361,0.00003493057,0.000031947035,0.9416445,0.04110553,0.015002671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017118649,0.000006176797,0.00014721439,0.00025020863,0.0000015264402,0.00010970228,0.00097388925,0.00003086626,0.000048096987,0.13347603,0.8649479,0.0000066857265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074879946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012675316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07354932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055911257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063068024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24604702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311446111","doi":"10.1515/ijld-2022-2072","title":"Politics behind the law: unveiling the discursive strategies in extradition hearings on Meng Wanzhou","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Legal Discourse","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Social Science Fund of China; Zhejiang University","keywords":"Politics; Cognitive reframing; Injustice; Adjudication; Power (physics); Context (archaeology); Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.027032623383448497,"score_gpt":0.3498941774991905,"score_spread":0.322861554115742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311446111","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9871132,0.00024398406,0.0005177274,0.0006293706,0.00003153252,0.000036111378,0.0001277312,0.000009495195,0.011290942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99664426,0.00010423217,0.00024356022,0.00003990359,0.000013752513,0.00001892699,0.0000775031,0.000008394564,0.0028495272],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997129,0.0013650865,0.00013895638,0.00029930286,0.0006374672,0.0004301724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930674,0.005133059,0.00067783747,0.00037080635,0.00042440122,0.00032648174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031537903,0.00032630574,0.00041468654,0.004517026,0.0076609245,0.0039102426,0.00075451785,0.0008160959,0.0045905286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007911591,0.00024174279,0.00016284025,0.004346008,0.0054735537,0.0021012533,0.003431557,0.0012611636,0.00020551575],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053602176,0.00002762076,0.022894496,0.00017910657,0.000012640617,0.003315865,0.9366646,0.00013556766,0.0030984967,0.010954494,0.0017531466,0.020910325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003797266,0.000025592039,0.073900096,0.00018837313,0.000015617507,0.0003093079,0.8772949,0.00047957242,0.0014002929,0.0016741771,0.044677746,0.000030523606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036937613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08514451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9630624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052186307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002162281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07344526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311839093","doi":"10.1590/2179-8966/2022/70892","title":"O Constitucionalismo não escrito do Common Law e a Constituição viva","year":2022,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Direito e Práxis","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.044365784634819126,"score_gpt":0.3167376132083097,"score_spread":0.27237182857349057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311839093","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13647896,0.009914137,0.025713122,0.024831794,0.00035378445,0.000045905042,0.00012101164,0.00003034303,0.8025109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977007,0.002369963,0.0015898105,0.0008973914,0.00015692803,0.000029128101,0.000036489768,0.000016551518,0.01789686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971312,0.0015268906,0.000097208744,0.00038234514,0.00062117877,0.00024108501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996815,0.0019134874,0.0003531987,0.00034944454,0.0004222654,0.00014656017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027784943,0.00023223225,0.0003435041,0.0012531226,0.0029496932,0.008595894,0.0007985401,0.0015373469,0.004686309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004192325,0.00015029716,0.00027981107,0.0014264678,0.01945456,0.0045226295,0.002331403,0.0024415231,0.0003686984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029764456,0.0000026188227,0.0001732097,0.000014850385,0.0000010691512,0.000017501718,0.0016167924,0.000053774504,0.0000578204,0.9964096,0.00043620288,0.0012135967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011226404,0.000033256933,0.0028792403,0.0003082228,0.000019579253,0.000101222526,0.010044018,0.00079515623,0.00053210964,0.8918507,0.093407504,0.00001778188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058840993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00813528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008595894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046405154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039258897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03366947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311894268","doi":"10.1590/2179-8966/2021/56463","title":"Dimensões Institucionais da Igualdade de Gênero: o Caso Maria da Penha","year":2022,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Direito e Práxis","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Governo; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.049521300701542606,"score_gpt":0.31992293802078553,"score_spread":0.27040163731924294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311894268","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38415492,0.003528328,0.004001995,0.010267016,0.00009778755,0.00004666009,0.00008956878,0.000049088587,0.5977646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887533,0.00037995938,0.00038928547,0.00018995622,0.000013542411,0.000011044711,0.0000066562634,0.0000056148942,0.010250615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801254,0.00086633646,0.000044968114,0.00027615644,0.00034841927,0.00045149776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978536,0.0009353721,0.00030188708,0.0003577532,0.00021985301,0.00033156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020483278,0.00016229229,0.00023680746,0.0012911501,0.004973101,0.005299715,0.0005416148,0.0008174711,0.007907591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050614798,0.00018979322,0.00014073674,0.0017101233,0.014540479,0.0019767683,0.0036618554,0.0012981324,0.00024119532],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000144297155,0.0000072931575,0.005038738,0.00004499863,0.0000043666837,0.0002686126,0.062832385,0.000112175774,0.00049681263,0.9074904,0.001890099,0.021799725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002641677,0.0000802739,0.08593628,0.000722359,0.000043195465,0.0009026892,0.15126823,0.0005944205,0.0010934692,0.17615017,0.5831103,0.00007215318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048129003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15476857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048129003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006178117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00485789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0956977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312313963","doi":"10.7202/1092797ar","title":"Quelques réflexions sur la constitutionnalisation du droit et le constitutionnalisme au sein de l’État","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Constitution; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.01794479487429476,"score_gpt":0.236706465158373,"score_spread":0.21876167028407822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312313963","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030222759,0.0155671155,0.012795352,0.1212026,0.002174008,0.000057537472,0.00025383552,0.00008377211,0.8176431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65794355,0.0075936676,0.0045052473,0.028627941,0.0010979212,0.00011509249,0.00016446381,0.00015201021,0.29980013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943597,0.0017778943,0.00014200492,0.0009924623,0.0017567832,0.00097112986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972101,0.0012086424,0.0002161445,0.00033765173,0.0007416273,0.0002858691],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004057923,0.0004569743,0.00036643213,0.0012286549,0.009316058,0.0087518515,0.0011664723,0.0045956583,0.011835401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058898847,0.00029695002,0.0004720265,0.0016030105,0.034896832,0.005629278,0.0042997613,0.009365061,0.0010292473],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000763696,0.000004416305,0.00014405434,0.000023838056,0.00000248028,0.000035189863,0.00505416,0.00006757095,0.000093651804,0.98627615,0.0050708167,0.003220012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020702555,0.000022223547,0.0027373123,0.00036726266,0.000011295151,0.00011989418,0.0073914663,0.000279089,0.0005501123,0.22902921,0.75941974,0.0000516026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28178945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40058175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28178945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026311254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024264663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5602985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312395813","doi":"10.20940/jae/2022/v21i1a6","title":"Election petition and the future of electoral reforms in Ghana","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Elections","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Commission; Electoral reform; Supreme Court Decisions; Election law; Voting; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.009739551640304983,"score_gpt":0.2592632649086596,"score_spread":0.2495237132683546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312395813","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5599358,0.010372933,0.0015676529,0.13676919,0.00042438004,0.000089790075,0.0001156234,0.000022301567,0.2907023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991524,0.000873643,0.00022550528,0.0013793851,0.000065574604,0.000011922269,0.000011517996,0.0000055050914,0.005902934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955058,0.0023888217,0.00013369037,0.00022130385,0.00038518896,0.0013650627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948108,0.0024598588,0.0012947237,0.00023937388,0.0005438497,0.0006513344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005860933,0.00009215184,0.00026454817,0.00052833685,0.004806515,0.0059965453,0.00042754036,0.002719335,0.0066616824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010952256,0.0002202749,0.00020566906,0.000941207,0.008546743,0.004208896,0.0021092552,0.0038762873,0.0005201579],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008476808,0.00002886111,0.0055043357,0.00007909329,0.0000047859744,0.0007971579,0.013237242,0.00046677078,0.00037635487,0.9617923,0.0038664124,0.013761928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015113644,0.000283313,0.07622073,0.00091099844,0.000021851776,0.0008602466,0.06489635,0.0016835158,0.0013039658,0.33849925,0.5150783,0.00009030796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02105933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037878755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02105933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011209614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006273543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08133179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312495895","doi":"10.1590/2317-6172202227","title":"Crítica à interpretação privatista no pensamento tributário brasileiro","year":2022,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Direito GV","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Women's and Gender Studies et Recherches Féministes","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.047264153268751684,"score_gpt":0.32371791703444236,"score_spread":0.2764537637656907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312495895","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14617097,0.011325393,0.011897491,0.11384202,0.0012895189,0.00006862663,0.0003475776,0.00020019934,0.7148582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9581155,0.0025061767,0.0016299746,0.0028669285,0.0001930283,0.000030835232,0.00006544149,0.00009981406,0.034492254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99657685,0.0016127016,0.00011483146,0.0004993894,0.0008718045,0.00032441592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951283,0.0024252746,0.00031676207,0.0006582431,0.001288824,0.0001827223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034836708,0.0005192638,0.00051421666,0.0027420789,0.008980721,0.0066184676,0.0011547816,0.0025493805,0.0064571663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008225161,0.00037176287,0.00034051682,0.00339668,0.0237625,0.0031902092,0.0027315787,0.0038864955,0.00047514678],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023808683,0.0000070488354,0.002048445,0.00013660778,0.000008079149,0.0005501893,0.098495975,0.00025271144,0.0004648185,0.86769223,0.01638435,0.013935729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021935275,0.000020538597,0.013519212,0.0012420195,0.000060409893,0.0008615049,0.10153115,0.0021450056,0.00072035304,0.13066961,0.74913806,0.000070273454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4223257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.51744324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4223257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016963873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009306688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.839735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312615638","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3998389","title":"Enforcing Constitutional Conventions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Computer science; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.012659608719808434,"score_gpt":0.27816561225007047,"score_spread":0.26550600353026205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312615638","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048127763,0.0007294124,0.027479753,0.0186272,0.0004316734,0.00018079474,0.00011165188,0.00016589962,0.9041459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9127035,0.000401573,0.008513361,0.0044050217,0.00027205728,0.00026083054,0.00008847962,0.000118437434,0.07323675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97536135,0.010629091,0.0013989463,0.0037794071,0.0062558306,0.002575317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95395595,0.024273396,0.0033123104,0.0128597915,0.004565799,0.0010327321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031493716,0.0005442996,0.0007702032,0.001943124,0.0082730185,0.013389971,0.0026800602,0.00776029,0.013139048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06856249,0.0005762637,0.00059000734,0.0018594259,0.02149716,0.0074567953,0.0069470056,0.010459971,0.0020898152],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030382034,0.0000110302,0.00024177668,0.00000720369,0.0000038809553,0.000020321393,0.0010083473,0.00014051922,0.00009330384,0.9937431,0.0013385562,0.0033889331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001689069,0.000020113033,0.000773421,0.000081951875,0.000017612247,0.00003268072,0.0013016718,0.0006099824,0.00071691506,0.9392471,0.057166226,0.00001546684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008120391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010860371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031493716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004995511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014004529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16655666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312911308","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4291031","title":"The Future of Section 1 in the Law of Judicial Review","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.010375491848507654,"score_gpt":0.27844173409617556,"score_spread":0.2680662422476679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312911308","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022903737,0.034888733,0.015048002,0.51028985,0.00786195,0.000064038926,0.00020842915,0.00013548756,0.4085998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77887744,0.015843974,0.0066111917,0.10713442,0.020563053,0.00022647725,0.0001498443,0.00016168969,0.070431955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9627,0.026260879,0.00063460524,0.0026568184,0.00427302,0.0034745322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9122166,0.0703523,0.0040158276,0.0034100725,0.0073839985,0.0026211995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036238678,0.00047206855,0.0010599913,0.0027604208,0.0074815475,0.015770722,0.0023330061,0.016304474,0.011097909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06716577,0.0005939241,0.000784423,0.0024053461,0.018406166,0.01705932,0.002974433,0.011775201,0.0022673425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016726473,0.000012006885,0.00020786884,0.000030456044,0.0000029807202,0.000014016176,0.00038177986,0.00009022666,0.000030153626,0.97932386,0.012440016,0.007449989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015312897,0.000036021036,0.00075725646,0.0002870318,0.000010430066,0.000047386067,0.0004044963,0.00036343804,0.000093962764,0.93675756,0.061204944,0.000022096334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011645111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014002211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036238678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009646646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020211956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19165075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313018689","doi":"10.21056/aec.v22i89.1655","title":"Constitutional Law Around the Globe: Selection of Justices for the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"A&C - Revista de Direito Administrativoe & Constitucional","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Globe; Selection (genetic algorithm); Computer science","score_opus":0.0329436672377214,"score_gpt":0.3032520376290286,"score_spread":0.2703083703913072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313018689","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4587723,0.0056374245,0.0031143983,0.034123756,0.00041543372,0.00025942977,0.0013882798,0.00006864256,0.4962203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806302,0.00077428285,0.0006960562,0.0015380437,0.000024679111,0.000022229668,0.000181726,0.000029288281,0.016103426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902788,0.0010245807,0.00013239341,0.0008438872,0.003134305,0.004586033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926386,0.0010957828,0.00028984188,0.00017674273,0.0035130605,0.0022860086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033202071,0.00024800087,0.00056811544,0.0040595206,0.031290866,0.012864583,0.0014985601,0.0017344252,0.0074248016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013870802,0.00029607394,0.0003327064,0.0056799445,0.007326314,0.0017449369,0.0029986084,0.002720587,0.00037853234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009597343,0.00004571932,0.045505393,0.00007391046,0.00006124763,0.0012109875,0.033279363,0.0010245922,0.0011934802,0.80944407,0.055036623,0.053028643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008516082,0.00005318662,0.24847987,0.000550897,0.00014551892,0.00043188015,0.09391716,0.004103061,0.0017134715,0.08562125,0.56456846,0.00033004474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9915386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88367486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11632514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17104933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8440019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313165900","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-17731-6_1","title":"Historical Themes of Legitimacy","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ontario Institute of Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Curse; Political science; Blessing; Race (biology); Ethnic group; Popularity; Criminology; Sociology; Political economy; Politics; Law; Gender studies; Geography","score_opus":0.05870473145775478,"score_gpt":0.28505089314141546,"score_spread":0.22634616168366067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313165900","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023633607,0.0048210444,0.0028298893,0.014360965,0.00056048343,0.000021870275,0.000031239175,0.00002183901,0.9749893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45033854,0.0057186163,0.0020885018,0.008693112,0.0028100957,0.0002481533,0.000077080666,0.00021719602,0.5298087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953804,0.002335488,0.00008339634,0.0005882011,0.0011187171,0.00049383735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99516255,0.003546791,0.00014993278,0.00045156377,0.000524097,0.00016511319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047723907,0.0007133061,0.0008124909,0.0030806987,0.009862825,0.016498353,0.0019135153,0.007347204,0.014787978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011116497,0.00055564276,0.00026409177,0.0033917348,0.056187864,0.011873999,0.003761025,0.01072211,0.0026805815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.6972391e-7,0.0000016281979,0.0000037556435,0.0000020421514,1.4855259e-7,0.0000039280735,0.00040786396,0.000008214164,0.0000028279687,0.99732435,0.0018107711,0.0004338624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004438976,0.0000030918259,0.000055456658,0.000060821083,0.0000011079558,0.000024531602,0.000797904,0.0000947712,0.000052261566,0.84324795,0.15565312,0.000004520518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010878741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014659281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016498353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010485949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005744535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07608122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313362473","doi":"10.31078/consrev824","title":"Conflict Resolution in Human Rights Cases: The Role of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Fundamental rights; Law; Supreme court; Political science; International human rights law; Charter; Reservation of rights; Constitution; Right to property","score_opus":0.03832157133479444,"score_gpt":0.3005462988738025,"score_spread":0.26222472753900805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313362473","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06573919,0.06748506,0.008859155,0.22276773,0.0016440903,0.00017135784,0.00021568712,0.00006391545,0.63305384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9486255,0.014208315,0.0037909965,0.01419737,0.00040410363,0.00004854169,0.000064596425,0.000029156125,0.018631406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98431754,0.004520215,0.00038526594,0.0011560576,0.005851581,0.003769309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98165417,0.010231259,0.00069137017,0.00042052742,0.0052296594,0.0017730726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014051783,0.0002717771,0.00047496925,0.0037234596,0.02258058,0.016323313,0.0024081052,0.0055256714,0.0039649885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03411925,0.000396503,0.0003637317,0.004196768,0.021875339,0.004634181,0.0036678344,0.0052385507,0.0002182683],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075989283,0.000007780274,0.001365527,0.000050221566,0.000007620715,0.00026924678,0.0046263584,0.0004646674,0.00007085936,0.961974,0.01664288,0.014513229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005516363,0.000025438254,0.012989707,0.0014721592,0.00007781004,0.00033393595,0.019723505,0.003141313,0.0006139326,0.27592376,0.68546283,0.00018039241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95820177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97872216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10798095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10798095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17955238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7834603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4315565271","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-19063-6_15","title":"The Ur-controversy of Civil Justice","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Politics; Civil rights; Quarter (Canadian coin); Population; Face (sociological concept); Law; Civil service; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology; Public service; Social science; Geography","score_opus":0.029808941453130785,"score_gpt":0.2736444974774147,"score_spread":0.24383555602428392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4315565271","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021139004,0.0069064167,0.0018925269,0.017464047,0.00075617013,0.000014993824,0.000027676955,0.000023150867,0.9708011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30519968,0.005028774,0.0016729847,0.018528633,0.0024791874,0.00014380505,0.00006414129,0.00017054666,0.6667122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99726033,0.0017399634,0.00003888002,0.00021610325,0.0004367109,0.0003081119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983955,0.0011040947,0.000053874744,0.00015542029,0.00020345364,0.00008761388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002830961,0.00045802246,0.00069294707,0.0011935141,0.0056288587,0.008483538,0.0012666024,0.004915947,0.012840825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061716675,0.00032999035,0.0003006132,0.0013519755,0.016210733,0.0069290115,0.0019681042,0.006538577,0.002453455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010303335,0.0000034568325,0.0000064621318,0.0000037240497,2.451882e-7,0.0000051492407,0.00024570047,0.000012759294,0.000005746119,0.9930958,0.0054997313,0.0011202445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005423651,0.0000054854486,0.000152658,0.00007411347,0.0000017249178,0.000032117663,0.0007809868,0.00021083465,0.00007993076,0.80246985,0.19618154,0.0000053928698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012355421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016753577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012840825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048988974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044336114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04295689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4315699565","doi":"10.1017/lsi.2022.75","title":"State-Sponsored Activism: How China’s Law Reforms Impact NGOs’ Legal Practice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Social Inquiry","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Legislature; Politics; Political science; State (computer science); China; Public administration; Corporate governance; Law reform; Law; Business","score_opus":0.06619618636423244,"score_gpt":0.38321855633027424,"score_spread":0.31702236996604183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4315699565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9730886,0.00023143216,0.00019863501,0.002623428,0.000018644441,0.000026345584,0.000020155987,0.000007478149,0.023785219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982558,0.00006248663,0.00003183856,0.00014890045,0.000005939302,0.00000798681,0.000009223646,0.0000012426606,0.0014765909],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830097,0.00059342774,0.00004165281,0.00017681328,0.00026342738,0.0006236825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982267,0.0006327475,0.000358815,0.00009912766,0.00020284834,0.00047972254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024522778,0.00011246679,0.00020674946,0.0013478884,0.004008387,0.004056508,0.0006658482,0.00090315205,0.005085863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029700666,0.00010516269,0.00017535155,0.0013428893,0.004527443,0.0017222876,0.002610638,0.000981682,0.00013007075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016359889,0.00050051854,0.47402906,0.00024581922,0.00007120301,0.002812815,0.21572617,0.001702348,0.0043599396,0.18477546,0.008762392,0.10685059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053008593,0.00026001068,0.6852984,0.00021539748,0.000060589235,0.00014164612,0.2002567,0.005692872,0.0014079281,0.016577696,0.08996763,0.000068057954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03679872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08087103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03679872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064671463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074127153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07316905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4316169834","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv360npz6.12","title":"Why Alberta Needs a Constitution","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.029016213658975536,"score_gpt":0.23088124305923124,"score_spread":0.20186502940025572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4316169834","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010056778,0.0015315724,0.0005671333,0.0736209,0.0006406629,0.000020052084,0.00010911474,0.00006699734,0.91338676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2096287,0.0008767145,0.0011915916,0.055373352,0.000229496,0.00005331519,0.00011896482,0.00010421548,0.73242366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99665254,0.00043493268,0.00003725255,0.00033228047,0.0009319819,0.0016109915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836177,0.00043692996,0.000032521228,0.00013723296,0.00065356644,0.0003779603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027732064,0.0002903792,0.00034290814,0.00096187985,0.0161224,0.011588811,0.0017208732,0.00925278,0.03516813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053049233,0.00046431067,0.00037000794,0.0011360921,0.0088075325,0.0042414097,0.0029730687,0.0075148405,0.002875526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019304793,0.00001359152,0.0005211002,0.000017961127,0.0000037784419,0.0001934411,0.0017371125,0.00009834299,0.00011820386,0.86468846,0.12260106,0.009987587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001803525,0.000009353878,0.0017136126,0.00010762928,0.000010624058,0.000098234406,0.004647413,0.00015592342,0.00020058783,0.10133268,0.8916752,0.000030748473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8220606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.916516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9702875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02971248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05659015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35797465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4316169838","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv360npz6.6","title":"Oui, Quebec Needs a Written Constitution","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03046103355323336,"score_gpt":0.23409428301732493,"score_spread":0.20363324946409156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4316169838","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007983952,0.0077094804,0.0016852716,0.056666266,0.002280529,0.00015949662,0.0021242134,0.00030868902,0.921082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04955918,0.0017334418,0.0017657768,0.017560687,0.00019660957,0.0001347456,0.00045138015,0.00010502256,0.92849314],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987079,0.00015332698,0.00003960053,0.00015756773,0.00049217034,0.00044936856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989334,0.00019675647,0.00003284066,0.000095047275,0.0005826306,0.00015930666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014697158,0.00038846993,0.0005028654,0.00096062967,0.010094994,0.008989693,0.0011975876,0.004602218,0.04366722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032415078,0.0004529786,0.0004412275,0.0016899446,0.0024240043,0.0020905393,0.0011664979,0.0055177454,0.003390613],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028153838,0.000031340795,0.0008908417,0.00010933902,0.0000136263225,0.00023490818,0.001829418,0.00033571362,0.00041554726,0.43155125,0.5336998,0.030860133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012622513,0.0000057561865,0.0016005435,0.000098548524,0.0000074708214,0.000025582038,0.0006604648,0.00014130324,0.00013704543,0.0060866224,0.99120295,0.000021102876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9738124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98991734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95762056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04237942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.073983885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3074857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317368814","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192869678.001.0001","title":"Constitutional Public Reason","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Legitimacy; Ideal (ethics); Interpretation (philosophy); Politics; Public reason; Political science; Liberalism; Law and economics; Classical liberalism; Law; Sociology; Democracy; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05588037478176027,"score_gpt":0.2930715292216874,"score_spread":0.2371911544399271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317368814","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018366007,0.0025665404,0.023265556,0.014341234,0.00062558294,0.000060703158,0.00016558524,0.00013927714,0.95699877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45983568,0.004449197,0.018425098,0.012062548,0.0014160564,0.00045815602,0.000632574,0.00030541635,0.50241524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99646145,0.0012456414,0.00013685763,0.0006521381,0.0010971203,0.00040684687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981108,0.00093238824,0.00008757954,0.000480005,0.00029854168,0.00009070125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036714398,0.00036293746,0.0005426358,0.0008949076,0.0036873063,0.00847498,0.0014976934,0.0043531405,0.018085107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046768524,0.00034795,0.0006140946,0.00089286396,0.01486022,0.0066294335,0.0033253946,0.0059824055,0.003368072],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.7499373e-7,9.5244076e-7,0.0000041989333,0.0000039069632,3.2034936e-7,0.0000036812487,0.00008158843,0.00004249533,0.000006549643,0.9968208,0.002141503,0.00089358725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000452842,0.0000048703746,0.000035849494,0.000079341255,0.0000023706834,0.000029841434,0.00014394934,0.00023281782,0.0001255722,0.6721378,0.32719693,0.0000061041997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040274635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031078807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018085107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065557105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051577464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06050068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317369040","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192869678.003.0008","title":"Standards of Scrutiny, Equal Protection, and Illicit Motives for Discrimination","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Suspect; Scrutiny; Doctrine; Legislature; Supreme court; Proposition; Prejudice (legal term); Law; Political science; Derogation; Law and economics; Legislative intent; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05959043897863676,"score_gpt":0.3179209930499774,"score_spread":0.25833055407134065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317369040","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017723832,0.0032242434,0.006995242,0.010217299,0.00018720693,0.000041932843,0.000035086156,0.0000202993,0.9615548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90922046,0.0016349921,0.0034775604,0.0019904997,0.00028452196,0.00010040548,0.000045989324,0.00003621923,0.08320935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960957,0.0016944148,0.00013801985,0.0003250522,0.001437347,0.00030948623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99352705,0.0044344477,0.00040463105,0.000587247,0.0008537829,0.00019287702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038735946,0.00017760858,0.00025194616,0.0012044035,0.002475451,0.0075102006,0.0006846146,0.0021025434,0.006879401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008215495,0.00017375458,0.00020858615,0.0011080386,0.017311262,0.0035464074,0.0020228087,0.0028588835,0.0006212578],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.198619e-7,0.0000026567939,0.00006384198,0.0000052707214,3.26682e-7,0.000006277992,0.0005636093,0.00003538401,0.00002696092,0.9968616,0.00096551416,0.0014677703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004518623,0.000010202403,0.00087380747,0.00014460759,0.0000024499573,0.00003078932,0.0013508792,0.00032476633,0.00016866822,0.91437334,0.08271042,0.000005599372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036699348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062228516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075102006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004800164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033460238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03482783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317369057","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192869678.003.0004","title":"Motive-based Judicial Review: Introduction","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Doctrine; Judicial review; Legislation; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Legislature; Law; Constitutional law; Interpretation (philosophy); Judicial opinion; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03298887896390611,"score_gpt":0.2850086040906974,"score_spread":0.25201972512679127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317369057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035412866,0.11510342,0.029698035,0.04193901,0.004659925,0.00032229218,0.0003630024,0.00016306515,0.8042099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2506673,0.12792043,0.02107625,0.025635218,0.011609221,0.0010816403,0.00063268846,0.00028857563,0.56108856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976382,0.0011211565,0.00007460571,0.0002286846,0.00076964597,0.00016771276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99740005,0.0014831375,0.00010804743,0.0001787398,0.0007254173,0.00010459302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027076544,0.00029053094,0.00046185407,0.0022779861,0.0012249653,0.004210461,0.000876504,0.0019549867,0.0123828165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004817933,0.00031838904,0.00033170244,0.0017874967,0.00369406,0.0030648704,0.0016280899,0.002331078,0.00294716],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003429085,0.000011739617,0.000047992853,0.00012248698,0.0000025490501,0.000022669203,0.0002114884,0.00037025695,0.000052589385,0.92877734,0.052241158,0.0181363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051388834,0.000014561066,0.00033048625,0.00046247442,0.0000029099199,0.000058834186,0.00018287555,0.0005764253,0.00009432489,0.21473971,0.783521,0.000011299966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002925085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004358751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0123828165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050056465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036781717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041424632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317369069","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192869678.003.0005","title":"Problems with Motive-based Scrutiny—and Some Judicial Solutions","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Argument (complex analysis); Legislature; Political science; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Proportionality (law); Law; Law and economics; Judicial review; Sociology","score_opus":0.04965229276678795,"score_gpt":0.2508947139690968,"score_spread":0.20124242120230884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317369069","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03470399,0.015082901,0.14336519,0.5491174,0.0030394061,0.0003289445,0.00015929532,0.0002889419,0.2539139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9094712,0.0028217486,0.03568651,0.026018085,0.004447855,0.0005497763,0.00006700099,0.00020913772,0.020728722],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.91522527,0.041633323,0.0042992556,0.01065078,0.022090951,0.0061004595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9436168,0.03652166,0.0020092847,0.0072229784,0.009131744,0.0014975074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08692614,0.0008292442,0.0023369663,0.0046274993,0.009273098,0.017130075,0.006763918,0.0212939,0.005520548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09502771,0.0013756014,0.002875157,0.0025038836,0.046266057,0.020157155,0.011790609,0.02050073,0.0007815511],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004652711,0.000009230194,0.000073632444,0.000017764265,0.000009250727,0.000021357735,0.00035369524,0.0001415079,0.00002748855,0.9952302,0.0012053469,0.0029059348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022656239,0.000010304662,0.00012297262,0.00008149728,0.000007549974,0.00001973412,0.0003191511,0.0008130313,0.00008307226,0.9856754,0.012826911,0.000017734921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012508609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007414084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08692614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016091872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0150463395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4597149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317495515","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4326248","title":"Writing Canada's Political Constitution","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Politics; Political science; Law; Constitutionalism; Convention; Democracy; Sociology","score_opus":0.015944461855340895,"score_gpt":0.28582623033177645,"score_spread":0.2698817684764356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317495515","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03399684,0.0043105953,0.0015076057,0.13018674,0.0028431825,0.00015285243,0.0028249552,0.00014712648,0.8240301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43796915,0.002543986,0.0023840957,0.024187587,0.0005637778,0.00017588753,0.0010886088,0.00019835193,0.53088856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934727,0.0007426795,0.00018089262,0.0005787332,0.0026466136,0.0023785494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99267346,0.0023987805,0.00013582346,0.0004027541,0.003698743,0.00069048523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004688767,0.00063470774,0.0007442229,0.002457196,0.027495207,0.01677332,0.0022078245,0.007281652,0.024758684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019921657,0.0007666774,0.00057679124,0.0038838363,0.00799719,0.0028173109,0.0029830206,0.010089611,0.0018948591],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026585445,0.000015481974,0.0010109923,0.000048149577,0.000016523438,0.00012858328,0.00441533,0.0004712466,0.00010516522,0.705655,0.27580664,0.012300351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041411648,0.000010075937,0.0035667238,0.00026269394,0.000044009004,0.000034673994,0.0067142756,0.0005483869,0.00042077008,0.050730016,0.93755436,0.000072528215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99193746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9961134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12678559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12678559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2620029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91989815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317829597","doi":"10.1017/lsi.2022.89","title":"How Should Courts Respond to Political Questions? Exploring the Dialogical Turn in the Supreme Court of Canada’s Federalism and Indigenous Case Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Social Inquiry","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Federalism; Jurisprudence; Political science; Politics; Legitimacy; Indigenous; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.2075932223856702,"score_gpt":0.3600667689041165,"score_spread":0.15247354651844627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317829597","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2192997,0.0058689043,0.016697044,0.23415673,0.00046017897,0.00012916238,0.00010031557,0.00007807431,0.5232098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847647,0.00052711327,0.0013389866,0.006647811,0.000073836876,0.00003004439,0.000012234683,0.00001715336,0.0065881363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834524,0.007568906,0.00023081315,0.0013727631,0.002989995,0.0043851067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98491436,0.00995803,0.000752153,0.00039255965,0.0025547277,0.0014281934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01719089,0.0003185931,0.00045213656,0.0021979127,0.03031748,0.017576233,0.0025266765,0.0072858143,0.0032037941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026949544,0.0003774342,0.00045040553,0.0022732767,0.04454548,0.0065942714,0.0050082663,0.008702795,0.00023741787],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000727334,0.000012072804,0.0016399786,0.000022158278,0.000009456244,0.00028420295,0.034778573,0.00047566535,0.00022637186,0.95441705,0.003867175,0.0042600185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056947953,0.000021181655,0.011849447,0.00040767412,0.00006182591,0.00020523084,0.12051968,0.004051824,0.0010241109,0.6698371,0.1918222,0.0001428153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88883513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9271604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11116487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10303954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1049854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7476077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318977071","doi":"10.3167/jla.2022.060205","title":"In support of free-standing Indigenous legal systems","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Anthropology","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Tsing Hua University","keywords":"Indigenous; Jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Economic Justice; Criminal jurisdiction; Work (physics); Public administration; Engineering","score_opus":0.026374138948550112,"score_gpt":0.33179440830931395,"score_spread":0.30542026936076383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318977071","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3673851,0.0007751313,0.0022458723,0.02027601,0.000113847025,0.00007985061,0.00006477795,0.0000426158,0.60901684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915677,0.00010394392,0.0004191154,0.00046045904,0.000012473217,0.000009275356,0.000009599018,0.0000069089174,0.007410424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923143,0.0018636923,0.0001809129,0.0006950637,0.0019231843,0.0030229343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872552,0.0036536595,0.000999847,0.0012212041,0.0043213335,0.002548613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065138717,0.00019455011,0.00034169256,0.0021543342,0.02929575,0.010496156,0.0026905905,0.0017954311,0.009398142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0152751375,0.00023145569,0.00019907358,0.0017058882,0.041812196,0.0031595116,0.0075210915,0.003736029,0.00033890866],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022562464,0.000029754236,0.0049273088,0.000049081806,0.000010448465,0.00055042485,0.25358328,0.00016017864,0.00047332034,0.7206961,0.004271691,0.015225817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040126666,0.00006777516,0.029569587,0.00040085873,0.00006354404,0.000697408,0.457908,0.0013031192,0.001140099,0.17289829,0.33580935,0.000101806625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71528506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85259056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71528506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029367935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059848316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57278335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319454612","doi":"10.1111/jols.12404","title":"<i>Lawyers in Conflict and Transition</i> By KieranMcEvoy, LouiseMallinder, and AnnaBryson, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022, 440 pp., £85.00","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Transition (genetics); Sociology; Media studies; Computer science; Chemistry","score_opus":0.01885001309155168,"score_gpt":0.2543587121059403,"score_spread":0.23550869901438862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319454612","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009214119,0.81569123,0.00041906832,0.11929299,0.009588334,0.000039438222,0.00015379569,0.00010274462,0.053790838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02955657,0.49160737,0.00093766395,0.054536343,0.008975117,0.00018178968,0.0005511306,0.00027885122,0.41337523],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991322,0.00027129738,0.000037418533,0.00011012317,0.00027542494,0.00017361244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861026,0.00073674787,0.00018109207,0.00004234458,0.00015733208,0.00027216348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012195336,0.0009811041,0.0007100726,0.0013529815,0.0023111205,0.0070191035,0.0014833432,0.003932276,0.03202943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002943627,0.0008435996,0.0003955573,0.0037809752,0.003707156,0.008334786,0.0031344574,0.0060061575,0.013841053],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008066859,0.00001403974,0.00015785116,0.00021475578,0.0000030013475,0.000050953204,0.0012799462,0.000023464829,0.00003768612,0.003914309,0.9704927,0.023803405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044248327,0.000008974787,0.0008575702,0.0007801656,0.0000022730412,0.00013775902,0.0020902178,0.000023945893,0.000020980564,0.0025322193,0.9935328,0.0000086423515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020917712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05453331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03202943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004442378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051792925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.107149065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319586880","doi":"10.32920/22056788","title":"Twelve Angry (White) Men: The Constitutionality of the Statement of Principles","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Obligation; Sociology; Law; Statutory law; Denial; Law and economics; Racism; Opposition (politics); Statement (logic); Political science; Supreme court; Psychology","score_opus":0.14364767957028304,"score_gpt":0.36093277241238697,"score_spread":0.21728509284210393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319586880","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19854899,0.00095942826,0.008074832,0.038426757,0.00042510167,0.00017995818,0.00019681816,0.00006304788,0.7531251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87834525,0.0002109109,0.0011715009,0.004702584,0.00007488833,0.00007847902,0.00003788213,0.000030708798,0.11534783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98990846,0.0021223263,0.00027400255,0.0016346616,0.0030684783,0.0029919865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932134,0.0027995915,0.00044481322,0.0006833116,0.0018153841,0.0010433742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009098518,0.00019741397,0.00041613635,0.00044247086,0.017779998,0.0063843965,0.0012153451,0.0033313946,0.0070125693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013575738,0.0005604469,0.00023707493,0.0005046526,0.02071915,0.0019791638,0.003008529,0.005712924,0.00066591747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033630673,0.000019932015,0.0019329073,0.000022611017,0.000006033617,0.00024295531,0.02225581,0.0001361802,0.0008113171,0.9575374,0.008012267,0.008988927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010012666,0.00013749271,0.016245406,0.00025104568,0.000054799828,0.00021238739,0.022478335,0.00095975713,0.0024256362,0.16979524,0.78716797,0.00017181868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6525552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8197586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6525552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021188032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037208427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6989819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319844237","doi":"10.1177/0067205x221146335","title":"Active After Sunset<scp>:</scp> The Politics of Judicial Retirements in India","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Politics; Institution; Government (linguistics); Language change; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.039228230980859966,"score_gpt":0.3299607964961456,"score_spread":0.29073256551528565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319844237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7026497,0.0047999527,0.00048311148,0.05722167,0.0003585721,0.000016888358,0.0002000422,0.00005076676,0.23421928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875547,0.00037893024,0.000029695118,0.0017258393,0.000081155034,0.0000026520054,0.000011557926,0.0000062648237,0.01020929],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981217,0.00057931663,0.000045799246,0.0001509931,0.0002712715,0.0008309184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960245,0.0017156883,0.00063822774,0.00027155736,0.00055143115,0.0007986468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020450251,0.00006062197,0.00012711162,0.0009932356,0.00785405,0.004871195,0.0005498129,0.0011170667,0.0036498813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041380455,0.00013055562,0.00017568326,0.0010426487,0.0057467474,0.000876549,0.0023505446,0.002258497,0.00039208608],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016410057,0.000096413816,0.054665077,0.00018258774,0.00003163394,0.002064527,0.08320756,0.0007973808,0.0017387058,0.7113628,0.092864744,0.052824553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023669907,0.00014890055,0.272007,0.0005668115,0.00006388968,0.00091162557,0.093220145,0.00076479826,0.0029191624,0.03775941,0.5914711,0.00014346569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05682631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10841867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05682631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006069773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044535035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.112991035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320494920","doi":"10.1177/09646639231155606","title":"Jurisdictional Relationships: Democracy and the Administrative State Through the Lens of <i>Caring Society v Canada</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Jurisdiction; Accountability; Democracy; State (computer science); Principle of legality; Political science; Public administration; Indigenous; Law; Rule of law; Sociology; Human rights; Citizenship","score_opus":0.10494261767499226,"score_gpt":0.35428728047102315,"score_spread":0.2493446627960309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320494920","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16932333,0.005166785,0.0067999186,0.11322179,0.0002348144,0.00007936729,0.00010817921,0.00004175328,0.70502406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875525,0.00069580023,0.0005390829,0.002185707,0.00003629598,0.000016957498,0.000012777884,0.000012429962,0.008948374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959084,0.0013373916,0.000057910598,0.00027095273,0.00097308523,0.001452298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99798536,0.00079288584,0.00018303891,0.0001143118,0.00047601448,0.00044834812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027552827,0.00020038684,0.0002390492,0.0012894302,0.026824148,0.013140952,0.0014982775,0.002337462,0.003085946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040591024,0.00016985701,0.00027165894,0.0016749437,0.07104188,0.0034377659,0.0051855464,0.005324007,0.00013442694],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014274704,0.0000031118698,0.00032445526,0.0000057634256,9.085764e-7,0.000054848882,0.01983721,0.00008538526,0.000032095046,0.97736585,0.0012281046,0.0010607489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024043222,0.000015443688,0.0064286175,0.00030327914,0.00002432673,0.0002237487,0.15849718,0.0009962935,0.00032768145,0.46541497,0.36768296,0.0000613587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9424356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9566339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07290643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07290643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11680176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5289756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320723750","doi":"10.1177/08883254221144721","title":"Idiotic or Columbo’s Wife? Constitutional Conventions in the Czech Republic","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"East European Politics and Societies and Cultures","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Grantová Agentura České Republiky","keywords":"Law; Ratification; Political science; Democracy; Cabinet (room); Politics; Constitution; Constitutional court; Czech; Presidential system; Constitutional amendment; Constitutionality; Sociology","score_opus":0.047395438763517116,"score_gpt":0.30595760585394755,"score_spread":0.25856216709043045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320723750","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.107746474,0.018952478,0.013859404,0.016114755,0.0011364754,0.000074079486,0.00032304975,0.00012204758,0.8416712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839161,0.0021659646,0.0009814292,0.00094883965,0.000081500286,0.00002182512,0.000055443164,0.00004495044,0.011783942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99623907,0.0018566444,0.00024567157,0.00055381004,0.00061297265,0.00049184315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849665,0.00065988087,0.00025270405,0.00026549614,0.00018506464,0.00014015636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032912802,0.00019570584,0.00029993986,0.0013372545,0.0047162604,0.009110279,0.000610677,0.0009439587,0.004407407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075002373,0.00018907002,0.00018660224,0.0019870298,0.015338117,0.0048727836,0.0028699888,0.0028810618,0.00064381014],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010125353,0.000005009641,0.00041849658,0.000028596432,0.000003885805,0.000039790302,0.004762258,0.00010038363,0.00009829851,0.98771197,0.001415066,0.00540606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037948932,0.000030636555,0.007943809,0.00036744884,0.000022922713,0.00033331252,0.021258343,0.0005420305,0.00062802545,0.2618746,0.7068698,0.00009127512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01746818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018445842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01746818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005302073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041496097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038469374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321327780","doi":"10.1002/cjs.11766","title":"Acknowledgement of Referees' Services Remerciements aux membres des jurys","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Acknowledgement; Citation; Library science; World Wide Web; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.08166070235918853,"score_gpt":0.3178645075106965,"score_spread":0.23620380515150796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321327780","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016056025,0.011071366,0.0036302286,0.6044361,0.32283023,0.0011211426,0.0045156977,0.0013516862,0.034987595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1598672,0.008036821,0.006255777,0.13436502,0.1500756,0.0020273754,0.0026038657,0.0010552729,0.5357131],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97143734,0.007625123,0.00426248,0.0017709348,0.01144385,0.0034601442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7828279,0.036233854,0.009218223,0.007064174,0.13667196,0.027983924],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016444929,0.00103168,0.0013631377,0.0033069865,0.0056577967,0.004862948,0.0041040746,0.008304142,0.059330855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19794948,0.00081738085,0.0015642019,0.0025720997,0.0014464883,0.001788781,0.005093358,0.008430132,0.016644742],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021345711,0.000032348737,0.0014002785,0.000240911,0.000033148033,0.0025272868,0.0036040582,0.00012193835,0.0012397235,0.0027829679,0.9745651,0.013238747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000321433,0.000058893405,0.007826487,0.00018412434,0.00003763187,0.0015020604,0.0030814507,0.00033555063,0.00047415492,0.0007378151,0.98566425,0.000065479915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04946775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06457759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9406691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0080790585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02255147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19848144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321368849","doi":"10.24144/2788-6018.2022.06.9","title":"Dialogical theory of constitutional jurisdiction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Constitution; Political science; Constitutional theory; Constitutional law; Sociology","score_opus":0.12130931269363114,"score_gpt":0.371503140657479,"score_spread":0.25019382796384787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321368849","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012496506,0.0121947955,0.17344241,0.027718164,0.0006528966,0.00012662375,0.00033000874,0.00017722882,0.7728613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9063247,0.004181765,0.032661844,0.0040450217,0.0011775071,0.000528757,0.00023361146,0.00010755512,0.050739113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99590045,0.0022433328,0.00015310565,0.0007306916,0.0006001996,0.00037208272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99703085,0.0020578678,0.00017415873,0.00025848407,0.00028695224,0.00019174808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044451477,0.0006081878,0.000653652,0.0020829372,0.004540302,0.008211569,0.0022626347,0.0037412914,0.012973586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042068814,0.00037171715,0.00090919755,0.0017346919,0.023945268,0.011059517,0.0038424123,0.0042570625,0.0011630928],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001016866,0.0000012139054,0.00000662604,0.0000060527523,6.962421e-7,0.000008848822,0.000326863,0.00009496873,0.000009106115,0.9989926,0.00019615998,0.000355927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009363315,0.0000035352948,0.000021729127,0.000018309282,0.0000021196795,0.00001532258,0.00015815206,0.00062586303,0.000021791675,0.98262006,0.016500212,0.0000034249244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064498927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030655072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012973586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009169748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049127056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06653148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323244414","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4373693","title":"The Global Expansion of Judicial Power","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.012980106029116811,"score_gpt":0.296166475846758,"score_spread":0.28318636981764117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323244414","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21046215,0.007512874,0.0015067749,0.04096223,0.00028281508,0.000019172878,0.00048607733,0.00005924396,0.7387087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9731041,0.0032368675,0.0003987698,0.0033920268,0.00043687815,0.000014888999,0.00012698957,0.00003728139,0.01925225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922645,0.0001983709,0.000019915613,0.00017455957,0.00016512898,0.00021562281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848014,0.000588187,0.00024875367,0.00028112717,0.00026258043,0.00013926004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010766044,0.00022249293,0.0002627867,0.001776405,0.0013767186,0.003947461,0.00028943006,0.0013819693,0.017888295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026537182,0.00017694834,0.0002682252,0.0033037174,0.0062281447,0.004250926,0.0024968977,0.0024558732,0.00090896984],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004819115,0.000020222962,0.0067540635,0.00011007976,0.000017988476,0.00028227892,0.004975586,0.000595324,0.0007525686,0.92309546,0.014073462,0.04927482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003924653,0.000057243,0.12763965,0.00040846146,0.000034755747,0.0006481105,0.00926111,0.00060521,0.0005084076,0.2797242,0.5810422,0.000031454107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005089923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01204182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017888295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024599908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014397708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059842348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324141003","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12648","title":"Activists in international courts: Backlash, funding, and strategy in international legal mobilization","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Mobilization; Backlash; Political science; Law; Public administration; Engineering","score_opus":0.05077825185227353,"score_gpt":0.36779101046751156,"score_spread":0.31701275861523803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324141003","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055571407,0.012878216,0.0057956697,0.29004428,0.0018004188,0.00017670181,0.000039001246,0.00008162255,0.63361275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8601418,0.0054382095,0.0022643665,0.058324978,0.0018908216,0.00034072672,0.000057447152,0.00012561824,0.07141606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9789024,0.009720155,0.0005584374,0.0019597441,0.0022478362,0.0066114636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.966934,0.017400064,0.002144405,0.0013429073,0.0023967873,0.009781835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022645226,0.0004578162,0.00048830494,0.0028557845,0.0144374,0.029795775,0.0026514754,0.012014735,0.025133183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035350695,0.00055120967,0.0005626973,0.0024852385,0.025875298,0.015452108,0.01779227,0.013057634,0.0014580138],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017342349,0.00007805415,0.0017538745,0.00005154904,0.000008347959,0.00017800291,0.0143277915,0.00016580039,0.00014674735,0.93410057,0.019880705,0.029291164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008726366,0.00010999602,0.005177086,0.0011567735,0.000036328714,0.00018053656,0.050675027,0.0007681337,0.000378987,0.3292405,0.6121163,0.0000731218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011322707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017893136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029795775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011064138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024136638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11976081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324141090","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12642","title":"Foreign agents or agents of justice? Private foundations, backlash against non-governmental organizations, and international human rights litigation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Pomona College","keywords":"Human rights; Premise; Political science; Law; Foundation (evidence); Economic Justice; International human rights law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.05267449039984401,"score_gpt":0.3565828156326064,"score_spread":0.3039083252327624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324141090","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21091717,0.38862377,0.0013208116,0.1914303,0.0015109726,0.000058192516,0.000101683225,0.00001892908,0.20601821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9263979,0.056614116,0.00024314539,0.01038378,0.00084145763,0.000030266177,0.000025595094,0.000006006914,0.0054577985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99108994,0.0053676437,0.00029558464,0.00056131865,0.0015782332,0.0011073473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803355,0.013837924,0.0029432788,0.00034897655,0.0017712034,0.0007631423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011281833,0.000108026485,0.0003879945,0.0029889785,0.0025944344,0.0065686167,0.0006672878,0.00473179,0.0026825569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02036777,0.00018050257,0.00030498524,0.0019099242,0.008467506,0.0035692016,0.0014823723,0.0025286567,0.00030116542],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006739793,0.00012891581,0.017766034,0.0011119359,0.00010095767,0.0007037953,0.009154874,0.00072037405,0.0005387827,0.8507897,0.0403485,0.07856869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009953114,0.000337257,0.09288437,0.008854223,0.00031024948,0.0008327698,0.038050957,0.0012384118,0.0010796223,0.19781561,0.6583824,0.00011458936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019135332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031985044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019135332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059443144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008166574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059664726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360619863","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192855480.003.0001","title":"European Constitutional Imaginaries","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.057941121754552745,"score_gpt":0.28735572829893397,"score_spread":0.22941460654438123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360619863","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058690542,0.008702618,0.0017852978,0.0089515345,0.0003864215,0.000005755319,0.000039159353,0.000022902826,0.9742373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7667225,0.00825922,0.0017418679,0.0053543714,0.00063495204,0.00005471392,0.00014078089,0.000070747235,0.21702085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984086,0.0007400486,0.000047116697,0.000219813,0.00042926232,0.000155063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935335,0.00040258723,0.000024660774,0.00008742521,0.00009600096,0.000035987625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020685233,0.00028890267,0.00028130683,0.001393501,0.0023985205,0.005692232,0.0005032701,0.0018652919,0.007960624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028982384,0.00012348144,0.0001808209,0.0012751216,0.010454149,0.0033252903,0.0017559121,0.0027649493,0.00058475387],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010044274,0.0000014220706,0.0000071355557,0.000004935834,2.545694e-7,0.0000060528014,0.00038973958,0.000047048026,0.000013933828,0.9956755,0.0023274987,0.0015254534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035826793,0.000006070577,0.00016912312,0.00020891934,0.00000217701,0.000041463543,0.0014689545,0.00028742565,0.00019637024,0.4896093,0.50800174,0.0000048559564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035344167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003276933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007960624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00646206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019379533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04688567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361741323","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4391710","title":"The Old Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Commonwealth; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.032951960051522136,"score_gpt":0.3096275215853399,"score_spread":0.2766755615338178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361741323","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035940845,0.0012648213,0.04028663,0.020320637,0.00035819891,0.00005395837,0.00017545062,0.00008323963,0.9015162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90157574,0.00060437666,0.003577803,0.0024467383,0.0006130307,0.00013593392,0.000063243846,0.00008511454,0.090898044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99455017,0.002161051,0.00013487287,0.0009695282,0.0013133889,0.00087097456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99528027,0.001946809,0.00033991976,0.0012326462,0.000852324,0.0003479907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004099359,0.00042411068,0.0006393081,0.0029481524,0.005451273,0.010525913,0.0013708416,0.0040836693,0.012119438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011258061,0.0004295615,0.0005974862,0.0027930627,0.025384614,0.008750507,0.004037911,0.0054185158,0.001439424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010935771,0.0000014782926,0.000027294986,0.0000011010742,8.223716e-7,0.00000283396,0.00007976273,0.000029342595,0.000003866415,0.9990132,0.000397834,0.0004414244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005089165,0.0000024572703,0.00010688325,0.0000100199995,0.0000023752966,0.000011702675,0.0000745848,0.00022105704,0.000016013319,0.9893339,0.010212556,0.000003344945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014444262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014716771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014444262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061734547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048884572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044791818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366431488","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4414433","title":"Making Constitutional Judges Accountable for Deliberating","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Constitutional law; Law; Law and economics; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.05591310676735337,"score_gpt":0.35368655113945346,"score_spread":0.29777344437210007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366431488","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14646628,0.0013358679,0.101020314,0.12604068,0.0016644944,0.0004235688,0.00032561828,0.00047494395,0.62224823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9717951,0.00018967794,0.006691389,0.0033949963,0.00023930022,0.00017751749,0.00004881587,0.00010831813,0.017354826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9501447,0.02666738,0.0021986044,0.0059533706,0.0075758263,0.007460146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8733219,0.08763292,0.008651565,0.01702901,0.00871518,0.004649421],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041056305,0.0005388786,0.001068349,0.0022189221,0.011213547,0.019289851,0.0044290023,0.012385482,0.014301536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16621488,0.0010023027,0.0009320572,0.0017976449,0.015367224,0.013028814,0.0065638297,0.011178179,0.0021147411],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005619105,0.00006655933,0.0024720526,0.00004644455,0.00006092871,0.00025558737,0.004957571,0.0018085449,0.0003258737,0.9577766,0.013820151,0.018353457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041552812,0.000015109227,0.0012719345,0.00006975604,0.00007154912,0.000042597112,0.0017736868,0.0032157025,0.00066119374,0.96015245,0.032648396,0.000036145084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012578148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022302218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041056305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064959466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020422392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21712911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366521663","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4414387","title":"The Old Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Commonwealth; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.032951960051522136,"score_gpt":0.3096275215853399,"score_spread":0.2766755615338178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366521663","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035940845,0.0012648213,0.04028663,0.020320637,0.00035819891,0.00005395837,0.00017545062,0.00008323963,0.9015162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90157574,0.00060437666,0.003577803,0.0024467383,0.0006130307,0.00013593392,0.000063243846,0.00008511454,0.090898044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99455017,0.002161051,0.00013487287,0.0009695282,0.0013133889,0.00087097456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99528027,0.001946809,0.00033991976,0.0012326462,0.000852324,0.0003479907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004099359,0.00042411068,0.0006393081,0.0029481524,0.005451273,0.010525913,0.0013708416,0.0040836693,0.012119438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011258061,0.0004295615,0.0005974862,0.0027930627,0.025384614,0.008750507,0.004037911,0.0054185158,0.001439424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010935771,0.0000014782926,0.000027294986,0.0000011010742,8.223716e-7,0.00000283396,0.00007976273,0.000029342595,0.000003866415,0.9990132,0.000397834,0.0004414244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005089165,0.0000024572703,0.00010688325,0.0000100199995,0.0000023752966,0.000011702675,0.0000745848,0.00022105704,0.000016013319,0.9893339,0.010212556,0.000003344945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014444262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014716771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014444262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061734547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048884572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044791818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366957416","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4416662","title":"Constructing the Demos: Voter Qualification Laws in Comparative Context","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.060597607256213326,"score_gpt":0.35122751707053945,"score_spread":0.2906299098143261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366957416","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22565818,0.0022337683,0.1118046,0.029833611,0.00045925638,0.0001658838,0.0005970294,0.00012473926,0.62912285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878329,0.000196225,0.006433675,0.000558474,0.000090476584,0.0000689896,0.000057883586,0.00003719428,0.004724183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99499595,0.0034002448,0.00013835428,0.00061848573,0.00036013563,0.0004868882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913692,0.0057800077,0.00075995276,0.0011923199,0.0005942783,0.0003042942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009687018,0.00026648652,0.000795984,0.0040056524,0.0053935307,0.004449721,0.0016215345,0.0027601805,0.017473934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024172572,0.00048438433,0.00045229777,0.0033717074,0.023403909,0.012609349,0.0038728,0.0034573001,0.0006001024],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044415374,0.0000030507551,0.00018112175,0.000008431546,9.895402e-7,0.00000857158,0.00064638286,0.00006560809,0.000012646802,0.9971142,0.00042381324,0.0015307391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001167228,0.000011976804,0.0010278996,0.00006360095,0.0000073848055,0.000018043142,0.0028826012,0.00063755177,0.00013845487,0.98299336,0.012200064,0.000007331013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005583424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012872881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017473934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029744275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024099858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058456123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366987674","doi":"10.29173/psur352","title":"Unwritten Constitutional Principles: Ensuring Consistency and Evolution in Canadian Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Undergraduate Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Legislature; Law; Political science; Constitutional review; Supreme court; Action (physics); Constitution; Computer science","score_opus":0.06360794219368804,"score_gpt":0.3409809694621175,"score_spread":0.27737302726842944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366987674","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20594873,0.09670043,0.026432252,0.13815126,0.0008510639,0.00054566946,0.0008612651,0.00017006755,0.53033924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9671071,0.011219119,0.0107169,0.0033217953,0.00010040892,0.000057526686,0.00013130282,0.000038321254,0.0073075416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9733228,0.0067567783,0.0011317125,0.0023738153,0.01355526,0.0028595745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9504136,0.018346816,0.0030244358,0.0032813598,0.02370241,0.0012314334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02871799,0.0002260836,0.00043910037,0.0066414718,0.012403155,0.011375135,0.0026173138,0.0019602373,0.0015777901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08535364,0.0004323091,0.00027560713,0.009215624,0.025771147,0.004284976,0.0028145353,0.0029653655,0.00012183162],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020056745,0.000011149354,0.0056288876,0.00044033493,0.000029347168,0.00020453392,0.03592709,0.0010412162,0.00057082676,0.8208215,0.009377079,0.125928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051595707,0.000050007562,0.067571625,0.0031057214,0.00016434451,0.0002541122,0.031097231,0.0021984943,0.0017742192,0.2681885,0.62532896,0.00021528413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95749307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9769623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.116444014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.116444014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23321268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8448644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4372080422","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v33i3-4.5810","title":"Protecting Rights in Common Law Constitutional Systems; a Framework for a Comparative Study","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Law; Parliamentary sovereignty; Political science; Common law; Constitution; Bill of rights; Constitutional law; Legislature; Human rights; Constitutional review; Fundamental rights; Comparative law; Politics; Democracy; Sovereignty","score_opus":0.0721219157603624,"score_gpt":0.314255935206012,"score_spread":0.2421340194456496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4372080422","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032246023,0.043832816,0.09942475,0.040661003,0.0006023423,0.00021076843,0.00012965057,0.00006420709,0.7828284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9444594,0.013329449,0.024917811,0.002902188,0.00055719697,0.00064699404,0.0001112344,0.00008735461,0.012988458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97101045,0.023900239,0.00042253645,0.0010430486,0.0020404127,0.0015833796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98187125,0.014380225,0.00086354034,0.0015736012,0.0008123095,0.0004990796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022459824,0.0007836307,0.0011824556,0.008171767,0.010304871,0.017726589,0.0029049292,0.0074222507,0.0065068156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02012844,0.0005419767,0.0009995322,0.007433138,0.081753306,0.035246663,0.007777997,0.007894614,0.0004417104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.523893e-7,0.0000028597447,0.000017897371,0.000008347151,9.718746e-7,0.000009936433,0.0008940207,0.000052652733,0.0000062253707,0.9982849,0.00011376602,0.00060774334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009523119,0.000019431163,0.00022654992,0.00024792153,0.0000058372707,0.00005915563,0.0061095837,0.00046966595,0.00005727636,0.9448566,0.047927573,0.000010867387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01058663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008277475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022459824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019303996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069081616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1400609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376128962","doi":"10.1093/psquar/qqad008","title":"Taking Ideas Seriously in Political Science: The Diffusion of Presidentialism in Latin America after Independence","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Positive economics; Independence (probability theory); Political science; Epistemology; Disadvantaged; Discipline; Salient; Foundation (evidence); Construct (python library); Democracy; Generalization; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.02035971232431383,"score_gpt":0.33475976068230956,"score_spread":0.31440004835799573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376128962","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91385293,0.0020481027,0.00051963475,0.029558506,0.00013820376,0.000021116477,0.00007854977,0.000013167356,0.053769715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99809915,0.0003011076,0.000071255854,0.00035708206,0.000036061254,0.000006498071,0.000020394868,0.000005600598,0.0011029609],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962734,0.0019962792,0.0001289898,0.00043037627,0.00050524675,0.000665698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9701618,0.019325707,0.0045876163,0.0015158935,0.0032374824,0.0011714895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0129478,0.0001249983,0.00039395192,0.0023277537,0.004081261,0.0065963836,0.00082260545,0.0018090524,0.0035395522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04201246,0.00018006319,0.00022553437,0.004703896,0.009622935,0.003950787,0.0034036394,0.0037644908,0.00016742015],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036876558,0.00013521116,0.14541346,0.0002567438,0.00008304632,0.001139647,0.4777239,0.0009812426,0.0020322516,0.29991367,0.008218481,0.06373355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010423815,0.00012935154,0.42004198,0.0007435955,0.00006562034,0.00031062035,0.3731557,0.0016700593,0.0013013278,0.059776668,0.14253508,0.00016574461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056030076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051886894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056030076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008611435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034829143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.111407876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376280060","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2023.8","title":"Public Law’s Cerberus: A Three-Headed Approach to <i>Charter</i> Rights-Limiting Administrative Decisions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Charter; Limiting; Guard (computer science); Jurisprudence; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.17849941339155584,"score_gpt":0.3406026480060538,"score_spread":0.16210323461449794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376280060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0499307,0.0016590997,0.12739922,0.20307648,0.00072835514,0.00028303018,0.00013850286,0.00031097358,0.6164737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9551488,0.0003334941,0.02343154,0.0077345874,0.0002108573,0.00007929946,0.000030361725,0.000066041815,0.012965107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.982685,0.0072585586,0.00055645284,0.0018214058,0.004718469,0.0029600475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98781514,0.005321909,0.0009307186,0.0012791061,0.003651188,0.0010019399],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019100418,0.00052676693,0.0008965881,0.0038654117,0.011605236,0.017243352,0.0037926391,0.008046669,0.004521565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018213598,0.0006358339,0.0011397321,0.0017136412,0.070491955,0.008193406,0.0059475726,0.012223691,0.0005753691],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033865608,0.000004972688,0.00006895712,0.0000046032715,0.0000014763991,0.000028911414,0.001156466,0.00017732156,0.000027992897,0.99603194,0.0012079676,0.0012860477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015970982,0.000013262258,0.00023107555,0.00009611382,0.000015374793,0.00004454648,0.0026478546,0.0029341981,0.00032110407,0.9575429,0.036102857,0.00003474584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16893551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20638973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83106446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04085607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0559114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33590436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376866467","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2023.7","title":"Rights Talk and Constitutional Emotivism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Conflation; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Epistemology; Constitutional law; Law; Sociology; Sentence; Political science; Philosophy; Law and economics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.029012186724913906,"score_gpt":0.29176429331943665,"score_spread":0.26275210659452275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376866467","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18155693,0.0029528732,0.041678056,0.04411285,0.0006657456,0.000042888092,0.000051560128,0.0001056187,0.7288335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948808,0.00020399378,0.00067877996,0.00094653014,0.000085406005,0.000012306729,0.000006393994,0.000013576966,0.0031723268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99263483,0.0050488017,0.00014896608,0.0005874044,0.001045505,0.0005345002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928033,0.0050359378,0.0006434171,0.0005628073,0.0005265042,0.00042807875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006360773,0.00026019613,0.00030340758,0.0012313536,0.003960942,0.007199576,0.000751446,0.002055839,0.0042582653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009228552,0.00016835182,0.00029147702,0.00055786385,0.04000846,0.0067678373,0.007074881,0.0037173638,0.00030060147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008162631,0.0000070844694,0.0002007515,0.000018552471,0.0000021933856,0.00004275963,0.012771147,0.00006816379,0.00015282875,0.9839665,0.00055253523,0.0022092485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012891263,0.000021357318,0.0010363298,0.00014632443,0.000008871525,0.000112523434,0.014581641,0.0005958933,0.00052650954,0.9230073,0.05992656,0.000023759872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010720709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008183862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007199576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032643247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013547526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03363937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377138232","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12649","title":"Relational legal consciousness in the one-child nation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Legal consciousness; Consciousness; Population; Social psychology; China; Sociology; Relational theory; Law; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.08590189137597894,"score_gpt":0.32889242320289863,"score_spread":0.2429905318269197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377138232","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9087758,0.0032696163,0.0011085998,0.01195232,0.00007602379,0.00006140428,0.000024849494,0.0000116905685,0.074719764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99805695,0.0004198637,0.00008571143,0.00027813762,0.0000047263006,0.000010624932,0.000003611705,0.0000020017856,0.0011382116],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99641234,0.002352542,0.00007018609,0.000251488,0.0004261277,0.00048732237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99757653,0.0011902772,0.0004041795,0.0001443712,0.00021476991,0.00046988353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004684078,0.00014908535,0.00033982264,0.0011400778,0.008217948,0.0044688955,0.0009444692,0.0011146219,0.003756684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005004122,0.00017879544,0.00013443039,0.0011010173,0.020805083,0.004509951,0.0057665394,0.002170177,0.00009934163],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007361123,0.000045619614,0.004516954,0.000079022255,0.000005061291,0.00090533996,0.840353,0.000046010267,0.00041136338,0.14406636,0.0007865831,0.008777371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005780758,0.000047807876,0.012669949,0.00028914446,0.000007715851,0.0004709653,0.90221107,0.00014415706,0.00025119056,0.011904263,0.07197748,0.000020437556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04054558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046581052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04054558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00837726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010697819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08061916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377230595","doi":"10.1515/9780228014775-004","title":"Oui, Quebec Needs a Written Constitution","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; History; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03046103355323336,"score_gpt":0.23409428301732493,"score_spread":0.20363324946409156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377230595","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007983952,0.0077094804,0.0016852716,0.056666266,0.002280529,0.00015949662,0.0021242134,0.00030868902,0.921082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04955918,0.0017334418,0.0017657768,0.017560687,0.00019660957,0.0001347456,0.00045138015,0.00010502256,0.92849314],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987079,0.00015332698,0.00003960053,0.00015756773,0.00049217034,0.00044936856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989334,0.00019675647,0.00003284066,0.000095047275,0.0005826306,0.00015930666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014697158,0.00038846993,0.0005028654,0.00096062967,0.010094994,0.008989693,0.0011975876,0.004602218,0.04366722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032415078,0.0004529786,0.0004412275,0.0016899446,0.0024240043,0.0020905393,0.0011664979,0.0055177454,0.003390613],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028153838,0.000031340795,0.0008908417,0.00010933902,0.0000136263225,0.00023490818,0.001829418,0.00033571362,0.00041554726,0.43155125,0.5336998,0.030860133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012622513,0.0000057561865,0.0016005435,0.000098548524,0.0000074708214,0.000025582038,0.0006604648,0.00014130324,0.00013704543,0.0060866224,0.99120295,0.000021102876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9738124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98991734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04366722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04237942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.073983885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3074857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377237480","doi":"10.1515/9780773555594","title":"Canada and the Ethics of Constitutionalism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Political science; Law; Democracy","score_opus":0.02439366407720996,"score_gpt":0.2377551708006889,"score_spread":0.21336150672347892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377237480","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047328626,0.018157836,0.0013564074,0.050608326,0.00051776244,0.000035011326,0.00012922191,0.000036875583,0.9244257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6287537,0.018397612,0.0026656052,0.021620696,0.0010465874,0.00018376301,0.00012709411,0.00020480507,0.3270001],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99203277,0.0022813792,0.00015936368,0.0006946343,0.0028385506,0.0019932082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99412185,0.0032329315,0.00019747367,0.00037811007,0.0015520159,0.00051768136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004016852,0.0006115676,0.00084074156,0.0026769864,0.021070624,0.017032195,0.0020639698,0.008037027,0.012813092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013984744,0.00069669425,0.00044372134,0.0051829326,0.040930875,0.004875975,0.0032879391,0.0098937,0.0008678537],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026751293,0.0000021578328,0.00004025329,0.000012271831,0.0000016375773,0.000014019295,0.0005971122,0.00007092404,0.000008986041,0.9888038,0.008739328,0.0017067993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022557957,0.0000052003975,0.0007969419,0.0002645169,0.000016463495,0.000038349586,0.0016595421,0.00039002518,0.0000702211,0.62764114,0.3690655,0.000029509807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94903684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9549625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.100996524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.100996524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15412991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7327845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377239417","doi":"10.1515/9780773569195-007","title":"The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: The Political Battle over Four Words","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Battle; Charter; Politics; Political science; Law; History; Ancient history","score_opus":0.02080638281531536,"score_gpt":0.2220930866857527,"score_spread":0.20128670387043734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377239417","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0067916946,0.01788337,0.0023397217,0.115917206,0.0020710141,0.00005530805,0.0004951528,0.00008671918,0.8543599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34049934,0.013911537,0.0042527,0.025184933,0.00097505597,0.000109601984,0.0002963596,0.00031652793,0.614454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942352,0.0006851532,0.00008587622,0.00051066896,0.0030830337,0.0014000298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99642473,0.000908328,0.000091033326,0.00019274403,0.0017625047,0.0006207114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036523098,0.0008246413,0.0007186784,0.0037126245,0.02313404,0.019433154,0.002300515,0.005990787,0.016366538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008508278,0.0007320037,0.0003841591,0.0067607732,0.033206373,0.00538726,0.0023246494,0.010529652,0.0014023188],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062256663,0.000002915266,0.00007040366,0.00001545226,0.0000012985337,0.0000188782,0.0023331305,0.00008501613,0.00003326017,0.903353,0.086146675,0.007933786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001113226,0.000004544627,0.0010130829,0.00017893322,0.000007697388,0.000026494128,0.0037221557,0.00021403149,0.00009361756,0.10677069,0.88791347,0.0000442396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9913414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9955016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15086976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15086976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23899691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98487073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377239704","doi":"10.1515/9780773554337-008","title":"The Conditional Nature of Trust in Canada’s Multinational Constitutional Politics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multinational corporation; Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.014263710753857893,"score_gpt":0.22620991930219883,"score_spread":0.21194620854834093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377239704","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09224261,0.0024247176,0.005967487,0.047893334,0.00013964134,0.000049707487,0.00031508604,0.00006411907,0.8509033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9643863,0.00042801048,0.00051770406,0.0014894769,0.000042132913,0.000022100263,0.000032274616,0.00003481488,0.03304732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99235415,0.0013516746,0.00013248438,0.0006830657,0.0023312438,0.0031472964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895152,0.00566544,0.00037796173,0.00069900864,0.0027010357,0.0010414165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006074228,0.00030795851,0.00060816284,0.0016690452,0.021150135,0.020004185,0.0023050967,0.004725563,0.010106851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023015564,0.00071546726,0.0004794942,0.0035806324,0.03157488,0.0051638028,0.0034519895,0.009459173,0.00039381464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004374933,0.0000030345486,0.0002993446,0.000004993305,0.0000034979776,0.00001871937,0.001822835,0.00023583512,0.000026507223,0.9926347,0.0031750235,0.0017712051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030162839,0.000010531696,0.008858836,0.00019635056,0.000044004144,0.000051437324,0.008910942,0.0029463235,0.00032174448,0.82649153,0.15204443,0.000093729155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97607124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98653245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15685482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15685482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17260733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9779289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377239826","doi":"10.1515/9780773554337-009","title":"The Construction of Canada in Historical Perspective: Distrust as an Inherent Component of Constitutional Debates?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distrust; Perspective (graphical); Component (thermodynamics); Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Positive economics; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Economics; Computer science; Physics; Quantum mechanics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.019726292055597422,"score_gpt":0.23046574832249203,"score_spread":0.2107394562668946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377239826","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015674576,0.013042748,0.004336437,0.07092349,0.00055522996,0.0000248898,0.00015825273,0.000046136116,0.8952382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9004714,0.007071055,0.0016727947,0.0070503056,0.00024194506,0.000045729328,0.00008244942,0.00011150502,0.0832529],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99645305,0.0009587085,0.000049883663,0.00030525235,0.0011496167,0.0010835525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99693954,0.0010236887,0.00018094399,0.00020754749,0.001126758,0.0005215211],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024325796,0.00036904195,0.00039083348,0.0025040633,0.01797391,0.014513582,0.0018334865,0.0025394328,0.0064283246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065207225,0.0002940617,0.00024789685,0.0042901896,0.04593392,0.0064187385,0.0032702475,0.0067048892,0.0004209695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015597291,0.0000010130744,0.00008849146,0.000006773965,7.8015125e-7,0.00001963918,0.0041098073,0.000044128476,0.0000112495145,0.99029326,0.0038710597,0.0015521903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000859031,0.0000053734843,0.001885073,0.0003938148,0.000012159663,0.000118718985,0.02292193,0.00066152384,0.00020924762,0.39136472,0.5823729,0.000045951707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93011606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94888306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09513619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09513619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09422328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6902646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377247848","doi":"10.1515/9780228014775-010","title":"Why Alberta Needs a Constitution","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.029016213658975536,"score_gpt":0.23088124305923124,"score_spread":0.20186502940025572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377247848","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010056778,0.0015315724,0.0005671333,0.0736209,0.0006406629,0.000020052084,0.00010911474,0.00006699734,0.91338676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2096287,0.0008767145,0.0011915916,0.055373352,0.000229496,0.00005331519,0.00011896482,0.00010421548,0.73242366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99665254,0.00043493268,0.00003725255,0.00033228047,0.0009319819,0.0016109915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836177,0.00043692996,0.000032521228,0.00013723296,0.00065356644,0.0003779603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027732064,0.0002903792,0.00034290814,0.00096187985,0.0161224,0.011588811,0.0017208732,0.00925278,0.03516813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053049233,0.00046431067,0.00037000794,0.0011360921,0.0088075325,0.0042414097,0.0029730687,0.0075148405,0.002875526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019304793,0.00001359152,0.0005211002,0.000017961127,0.0000037784419,0.0001934411,0.0017371125,0.00009834299,0.00011820386,0.86468846,0.12260106,0.009987587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001803525,0.000009353878,0.0017136126,0.00010762928,0.000010624058,0.000098234406,0.004647413,0.00015592342,0.00020058783,0.10133268,0.8916752,0.000030748473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8220606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.916516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17793941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02971248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05659015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35797465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378176817","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v16n2p58","title":"Reviewer Acknowledgements for Journal of Politics and Law, Vol. 16, No. 2","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law; Sociology; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.04087694016915497,"score_gpt":0.33860427066508403,"score_spread":0.29772733049592903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378176817","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009361627,0.0015241938,0.0006079983,0.119265504,0.87262475,0.00037752496,0.0004998415,0.00037915277,0.0046273046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031123252,0.0047822595,0.002045419,0.13355485,0.7320389,0.001687606,0.0015462192,0.0010575488,0.12017499],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9717078,0.0039434866,0.005111733,0.0020890026,0.015947003,0.0012009331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.36584684,0.023759129,0.008270368,0.0051027196,0.58870745,0.008313418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021679379,0.0025582144,0.0050021894,0.009295611,0.005353994,0.010476692,0.0046304436,0.017009698,0.13667335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28774136,0.0014254324,0.0031839027,0.0037824106,0.0023124414,0.006584829,0.00318408,0.0102465805,0.07948757],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014909656,0.0000030231672,0.000039583345,0.00015656414,0.000003200729,0.000037015707,0.000017292008,0.0000039380902,0.000025590418,0.00008894743,0.99731064,0.0022993465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010655641,0.000029607596,0.0007473069,0.0014523956,0.000043303204,0.0004991993,0.0002803315,0.00019807385,0.00019187763,0.0010914628,0.99526125,0.00009868737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043769972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074410047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13667335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044808993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00883383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45721787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378439274","doi":"10.1515/9780773574106-005","title":"IV The Supreme Court of Canada","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.018649107352518682,"score_gpt":0.2066137389977194,"score_spread":0.18796463164520072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378439274","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012273418,0.016795965,0.0005300238,0.078357585,0.0017337162,0.000088357185,0.0007766924,0.000055819575,0.88938844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23907495,0.0062909275,0.00080890075,0.04430292,0.0007421751,0.00015360335,0.00029106045,0.00013710646,0.70819837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942404,0.00050155073,0.000095709656,0.00065065525,0.0020567705,0.0024548895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967134,0.000678899,0.00008586307,0.0001937992,0.0016189296,0.0007091585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023046187,0.0007943654,0.0011538854,0.0022427293,0.033197846,0.017658314,0.0031791588,0.013951053,0.024845956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009508581,0.0010030064,0.00074852246,0.003801846,0.0105893565,0.0032304218,0.0028945368,0.013141724,0.0020377056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018553194,0.000015526513,0.00038387976,0.000032734548,0.0000113124015,0.00010509587,0.0010589298,0.00024525545,0.00005522925,0.814758,0.17762394,0.0056915814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036872425,0.000009482012,0.0020911058,0.0003125658,0.000037040365,0.000044362594,0.002313734,0.0004965422,0.00013666466,0.1010669,0.89338195,0.000072839524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9884565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9931959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11783295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11783295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22036158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8549419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378976484","doi":"10.3167/hrrh.2023.490204","title":"Transatlantic Legal Networks","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Historical Reflections/Réflexions Historiques","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Promulgation; Reading (process); Constitution; Politics; Democracy; Law; Political science; Foundation (evidence); Key (lock); Human rights; Annals; Sociology; History; Classics","score_opus":0.06320276122559484,"score_gpt":0.34698837339095984,"score_spread":0.283785612165365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378976484","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04513873,0.0018395913,0.0066598933,0.0059960107,0.00009157541,0.000027246691,0.00011324565,0.000039710038,0.940094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9403061,0.0012201937,0.0016243444,0.000562296,0.00005442094,0.000036549525,0.00009636904,0.000019017021,0.056080647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982609,0.00064012763,0.000062962696,0.00035300822,0.0003833438,0.00029970062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802566,0.0007281256,0.00023595577,0.0002457641,0.000521612,0.00024301714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016825997,0.0001635807,0.00013987889,0.0019357067,0.003880298,0.0048479238,0.00064878183,0.0011095596,0.024431527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004287766,0.00015448427,0.0001277364,0.0024334905,0.005293693,0.0038344555,0.0036463905,0.0012952603,0.0016599052],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027887363,0.0000032101893,0.00053546677,0.000010386957,0.0000018653502,0.000048791848,0.004377782,0.00010106831,0.00008325959,0.9841105,0.001725939,0.00899904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009617812,0.000024591633,0.003458535,0.0003283949,0.000012643557,0.00022156228,0.016645418,0.0013719297,0.00032938717,0.2228278,0.75475866,0.000011541188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027434496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034531545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027434496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063563893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004040366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08173162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379113600","doi":"10.5937/zrpfns57-41810","title":"Freedom of expression of judges in Bosnia and Herzegovina","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta Novi Sad","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Oxford","keywords":"Dignity; Human rights; Impartiality; Political science; Law; Democracy; Legitimacy; Fundamental rights; Convention; Legislature; Expression (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03438328803836548,"score_gpt":0.3116336844336658,"score_spread":0.2772503963953003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379113600","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.468131,0.07462915,0.0036429262,0.020058893,0.0023317162,0.00044130406,0.00017945429,0.000079341116,0.43050626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9624343,0.00650142,0.002195611,0.0029112746,0.00042382334,0.00015305294,0.00007058678,0.000023419288,0.025286611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99643695,0.0012300456,0.00022125477,0.0005440085,0.00060662813,0.0009610621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895406,0.00039202563,0.00021724562,0.000078387704,0.00016679848,0.0001915066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005562682,0.00044642133,0.00058826164,0.0014957736,0.0077495356,0.008959739,0.0012682473,0.0035491535,0.0033939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004458049,0.000531688,0.00043921004,0.0011755571,0.009534538,0.0021147875,0.0038485846,0.0032199167,0.00058056874],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002549882,0.00018886007,0.006186055,0.0005693592,0.000048444104,0.0024781204,0.02873059,0.0009437925,0.0058221584,0.84243685,0.010551268,0.10178944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003379696,0.0006778316,0.09944424,0.0042514224,0.00026328326,0.002061854,0.024047786,0.001257513,0.0048296186,0.13117373,0.73129344,0.00036126614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031909343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03746724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031909343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069824182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01001767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06344724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379743106","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12653","title":"Legitimacy and online proceedings: Procedural justice, access to justice, and the role of income","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Israel Science Foundation; University of Toronto; University of Michigan","keywords":"Legitimacy; Procedural justice; Economic Justice; Perception; Political science; Law and economics; Public relations; Law; Social psychology; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.0372675933224029,"score_gpt":0.35971346724323106,"score_spread":0.32244587392082813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379743106","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91715944,0.003750901,0.0016993334,0.01106796,0.000058977064,0.00003176523,0.00006616706,0.000008596999,0.06615687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989334,0.00042465367,0.00008176282,0.000101966456,0.000037614966,0.000005279339,0.0000088524675,0.0000016256073,0.00040492733],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937708,0.0032493684,0.0002478093,0.0003457889,0.0018540468,0.00053226703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9489837,0.028742272,0.013492936,0.0010619449,0.003896508,0.003822688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055599296,0.000111819616,0.00032946697,0.002628882,0.0014169861,0.0041097617,0.0005893624,0.00085940206,0.011349397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03794623,0.00009778597,0.0003274341,0.0022193252,0.005496855,0.002672316,0.0023357938,0.001664337,0.00029353006],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017333207,0.0008961953,0.71086526,0.00032653986,0.00020432375,0.00054719433,0.01578176,0.0009558317,0.0004952226,0.17406729,0.0035886462,0.09209843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024600564,0.00018825202,0.92945576,0.00051791157,0.000097048935,0.00028420246,0.015671236,0.0017927869,0.00022574648,0.040464897,0.011241202,0.000036399113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005481109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008155065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011349397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015238661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017828014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037967563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380232088","doi":"10.1515/9780773587014-010","title":"Canada: Federal and Sub-national Constitutional Practices","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public administration; Geography","score_opus":0.03674015013221284,"score_gpt":0.2441903977931211,"score_spread":0.20745024766090825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380232088","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016217057,0.0210357,0.0012979981,0.050629396,0.00053257647,0.00006341156,0.001367881,0.00015912499,0.908697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4013281,0.0149311805,0.003458002,0.01375717,0.0002328825,0.00013670593,0.00049988047,0.00028153713,0.5653746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939902,0.0005312918,0.00013050261,0.00055563904,0.0027770456,0.0020154924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996851,0.00077423686,0.00009795614,0.00022384952,0.0015229565,0.00052996224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002829559,0.0006861979,0.0007747267,0.0036830239,0.029565895,0.018551217,0.0030988348,0.0060325437,0.022234946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008230001,0.0010303555,0.00047506572,0.009986596,0.014316431,0.003695366,0.0028161579,0.0066471933,0.0013864811],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012561185,0.000011445328,0.00040660243,0.00004795631,0.000007678447,0.00005581107,0.003462397,0.0002953329,0.00006713001,0.8691091,0.11111341,0.015410607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018393066,0.0000066953403,0.0056682006,0.00033897118,0.000027823227,0.000055383145,0.0063800444,0.00063325564,0.00021190154,0.08177494,0.9048009,0.00008355622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9971757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99867344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23667713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23667713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3432351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88534635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380520798","doi":"10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.281","title":"Human Rights Risks in the Constitutions of the American Federal States","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Criminology and Sociology","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Constitution; Law; Fundamental rights; Political science; Novelty; Argumentative; Law and economics; Axiology; Sociology","score_opus":0.10150367057935293,"score_gpt":0.39482295734137507,"score_spread":0.2933192867620221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380520798","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8623041,0.0012070491,0.0022790956,0.0018154322,0.00004001055,0.000050892482,0.00005874197,0.0000112049975,0.13223347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987024,0.0001017234,0.0003833177,0.000053455813,0.000005505485,0.000013062123,0.000012068846,0.0000018498434,0.0007265814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99404716,0.0031846322,0.00016050365,0.00040570053,0.0012478546,0.00095430185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949909,0.0029426836,0.0007408684,0.00043957814,0.0007287457,0.00015725939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051022507,0.00014059455,0.0002729076,0.0031707953,0.0067382623,0.004381769,0.00046730423,0.00087190553,0.0020619102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016058467,0.00013197878,0.00020310911,0.0027057426,0.012532279,0.002173619,0.002326289,0.0015410761,0.00005676082],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052029052,0.000037754995,0.0054116207,0.000025377547,0.000013387268,0.00012611841,0.018730743,0.0006460911,0.000455,0.9599023,0.00032582076,0.014273804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009990933,0.00034686792,0.16766062,0.00055756426,0.0002154511,0.0005598348,0.095993854,0.004659097,0.002892662,0.58191866,0.14496237,0.00013314481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028353708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046337847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028353708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008230966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046897773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05972016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380523386","doi":"10.6000/1929-4409.2017.06.02","title":"A Case Study: Lessons from the Hong Kong Independent Commission Against Corruption","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Criminology and Sociology","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Language change; Commission; Institution; Perspective (graphical); Deterrence theory; Political science; Public administration; Public relations; Business; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.14507759183540397,"score_gpt":0.39374935675215483,"score_spread":0.24867176491675086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380523386","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91283584,0.002871438,0.002830855,0.019775512,0.00033480919,0.00032046798,0.0001465337,0.00003408322,0.060850434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823766,0.0022099002,0.002051052,0.0014096291,0.000060642044,0.000071873634,0.000042680967,0.000020521173,0.01175712],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99360365,0.004158278,0.00018875179,0.00027071036,0.0005310427,0.001247569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99034107,0.0046978355,0.00086107856,0.00066435896,0.0015569474,0.001878637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006019361,0.000686899,0.0005868445,0.0013089983,0.01933026,0.0062967753,0.0020447616,0.004005913,0.0035917966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008893633,0.00048069662,0.0004415123,0.0024035207,0.0093482435,0.0030013279,0.0035507847,0.0041777305,0.00038785106],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013836798,0.00079268793,0.063385755,0.00052608916,0.00006101655,0.11328492,0.659871,0.0028290735,0.0006098238,0.103131525,0.026476376,0.028893387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003128389,0.00016332137,0.015036875,0.0006353496,0.000043510907,0.0065994025,0.88512224,0.0013228261,0.00061727455,0.0027932294,0.08756352,0.00007114801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2726253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41022125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2726253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018417014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015157995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5420769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380629606","doi":"10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.282","title":"Protection Indicator in the Constitutions of the European Federations","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Criminology and Sociology","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Human rights; Novelty; Fundamental rights; Dialectic; Law; Identification (biology); Constitutional court; Constitutional law; Constitutional review; Law and economics; Sociology; Constitution; Psychology","score_opus":0.08526016487779756,"score_gpt":0.3342918106050398,"score_spread":0.24903164572724226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380629606","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8255927,0.0017726291,0.0036021478,0.0016414147,0.00012989769,0.000076959266,0.00077385874,0.000052955562,0.16635747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965167,0.00010316558,0.00073125074,0.00008083693,0.00001670194,0.000025688907,0.00020690683,0.000005595783,0.0023131452],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921456,0.0030091992,0.0005654756,0.0011396116,0.0016017219,0.0015383665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884802,0.0056622787,0.0021307282,0.0015127913,0.0017759269,0.00043803695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008902123,0.00019636138,0.00037261352,0.004847829,0.0035202908,0.0045371247,0.0005122379,0.0011288702,0.004449839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030746184,0.0001713706,0.0004491403,0.0047513377,0.0038487546,0.002502963,0.0027127438,0.0011305915,0.00026170706],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003035994,0.0000894963,0.058794342,0.00018032636,0.00008422575,0.00047136148,0.015218638,0.0019815168,0.0012140815,0.8443245,0.0034801855,0.073857784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084237494,0.0002895019,0.6467966,0.0006111077,0.0002494028,0.0005997172,0.014636992,0.0031395091,0.002836904,0.13292806,0.19770311,0.00012491523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011633141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009191597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011633141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046464773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030069365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047079444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380763104","doi":"10.1353/book4750","title":"Constitutional Politics in Canada and the United States","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"State University of New York Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law; Political economy; Sociology","score_opus":0.02973519143216795,"score_gpt":0.21504476240009462,"score_spread":0.18530957096792666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380763104","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060241796,0.05130358,0.000847071,0.09350622,0.0010442011,0.00007330764,0.0009462106,0.00009183297,0.7919459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7256052,0.018764485,0.0009984508,0.0153033035,0.00044624667,0.00009803971,0.00034798827,0.00012250851,0.23831375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936367,0.00081007887,0.00010242671,0.00036949126,0.002121043,0.0029602023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947724,0.0016869054,0.00018041501,0.0001464121,0.0019284539,0.0012854532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028240574,0.00055630703,0.0009616292,0.0050021466,0.038120743,0.024006952,0.0027599207,0.0064922143,0.011460998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011167537,0.0007303328,0.00055877573,0.0121332565,0.023547301,0.0034070862,0.0028324528,0.0068357894,0.0005686073],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001983831,0.00002631304,0.0010727491,0.0000350092,0.000010933575,0.000120537174,0.0052196207,0.0005917657,0.00006103757,0.9219222,0.058848344,0.012071732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004640996,0.000018811645,0.020883385,0.0005901353,0.000064634856,0.00007495951,0.024023926,0.0012315713,0.00024119148,0.14074147,0.81196564,0.000117883006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99658644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74415934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.25584066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3561756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86311936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381187418","doi":"10.46692/9781529222036.067","title":"Access to Justice","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Business; Law","score_opus":0.06709172330569699,"score_gpt":0.3805276435418158,"score_spread":0.31343592023611877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381187418","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002973861,0.002227865,0.0021077218,0.019504162,0.001031181,0.00009767388,0.00076158973,0.00013746221,0.9711586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21034925,0.0071940543,0.004156149,0.045766912,0.0017857994,0.00045014473,0.0019520213,0.0004932387,0.72785234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99048245,0.0021875405,0.0004918616,0.0010990633,0.0029979656,0.0027411138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99226475,0.0014201183,0.00052002276,0.0010908308,0.002420585,0.0022837238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003427087,0.00046090127,0.0007444258,0.0018733221,0.007748205,0.012626346,0.0018298337,0.0046543875,0.21627404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020411938,0.00029534235,0.00072614313,0.0017924211,0.006294186,0.009256103,0.013925395,0.005753549,0.04928155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025522477,0.000075184325,0.0022389763,0.00027664824,0.000015901918,0.00038135715,0.005750331,0.00010259381,0.00023334428,0.5741047,0.30909756,0.107697845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003759455,0.000015713726,0.0010541481,0.0004492087,0.0000037438197,0.0002735453,0.0017893355,0.000035376124,0.000052739735,0.03798865,0.95831704,0.000016839665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009751094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016012963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21627404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004422647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010389187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7235087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381431771","doi":"10.1093/icon/moad025","title":"Theorizing about the executive in the modern state","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Plural; Law; State (computer science); Separation of powers; Corporate governance; Power (physics); Judicial review; Law and economics; Democracy; Executive branch; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics; Computer science; Economics; Philosophy; Management","score_opus":0.03773854049261411,"score_gpt":0.3417221363990461,"score_spread":0.303983595906432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381431771","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061743595,0.020254353,0.018071068,0.08513358,0.00033340455,0.000021293403,0.00005952783,0.00004634343,0.8143369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809472,0.0041754073,0.0012595477,0.0024871281,0.00040841388,0.000018392782,0.00002564374,0.000012636991,0.010665718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991085,0.0004922138,0.000021271837,0.00010216472,0.00016713861,0.000108718006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889755,0.00067073316,0.000110163266,0.000094038216,0.00013727492,0.00009016853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020003715,0.00021216637,0.00020176148,0.001752743,0.0020990467,0.00501402,0.0005761349,0.0015435148,0.005219757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018995391,0.00014262498,0.0002393708,0.0016254515,0.018287681,0.0056884983,0.0016207811,0.0020629282,0.00030749672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.025652e-7,0.0000019970976,0.000075315904,0.000004785756,5.964766e-7,0.000007727875,0.00045571427,0.00010503221,0.000007494279,0.9982944,0.00048314195,0.0005630218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004353978,0.0000047586946,0.00039802876,0.0000988405,0.0000034047441,0.00002441691,0.0013036052,0.00053297443,0.0000381344,0.9593684,0.038219232,0.0000038443222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004404067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005219757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004770253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002020766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03461075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381436136","doi":"10.1111/josp.12540","title":"Federalism as an institutional doctrine","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Philosophy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Doctrine; Politics; Political science; Mainstream; Ideology; Law; Law and economics; Corporate governance; Sociology; New Federalism; Public administration; Economics","score_opus":0.06279266203403625,"score_gpt":0.3533331905862674,"score_spread":0.2905405285522311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381436136","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0138218645,0.0073309913,0.07672953,0.042525806,0.0007834144,0.000085377476,0.00022241367,0.0001743166,0.8583264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9138802,0.0046720337,0.022071248,0.009268845,0.002441871,0.000358577,0.00022618232,0.00013128796,0.046949785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99413174,0.0020970374,0.00031091878,0.0012222134,0.0013869153,0.0008510625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969116,0.0013580155,0.00033100668,0.000598361,0.0005683836,0.00023273287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051332735,0.0003667743,0.0006058646,0.0012988521,0.0055639567,0.009233894,0.0013184727,0.005007691,0.0050897445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004827717,0.00036837958,0.0009541166,0.001514092,0.031756986,0.00864363,0.0042494773,0.006497688,0.001201354],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.467849e-7,8.577709e-7,0.0000069081007,0.0000018597566,3.441388e-7,0.0000025575628,0.000052154453,0.00005007864,0.000005446947,0.99930847,0.00030450147,0.0002664964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050768795,0.000003955024,0.000043104694,0.000020010875,0.0000020510647,0.000011955776,0.000046400924,0.00033169473,0.000032546035,0.96766436,0.031835586,0.0000032458177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006096036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030571742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009233894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008136526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00860035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059034884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381513502","doi":"10.1177/10659129231183915","title":"Hierarchical Interactions and Compliance in Comparative Courts","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Scholarship; Compliance (psychology); Context (archaeology); Hierarchy; Certiorari; Judicial independence; Judicial opinion; Original jurisdiction; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.3859601098573573,"score_gpt":0.5436304890340797,"score_spread":0.15767037917672244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381513502","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9483393,0.00032249416,0.004669554,0.0010323618,0.000012231518,0.000046737077,0.00008793232,0.000030349469,0.045459107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988959,0.00003040089,0.00057883526,0.00005333798,0.000006837243,0.00001319903,0.000029465413,0.000004984129,0.0003871437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96957,0.017978426,0.0014505545,0.0027163618,0.0056074755,0.0026772202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94752055,0.02267655,0.017990058,0.0051039634,0.0050591948,0.0016497201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015117524,0.00015861822,0.00052064774,0.002997287,0.0042357245,0.0047522197,0.0010095859,0.0010593291,0.0057899496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06738417,0.00031263728,0.0003344976,0.0052447915,0.00840937,0.0030316142,0.0042885905,0.0010943322,0.00028411593],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021423484,0.00030746372,0.4303967,0.00015299054,0.0002023026,0.00042016528,0.052319374,0.0064871404,0.0016546933,0.45627987,0.0015137141,0.05005129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081760736,0.00032133088,0.80453724,0.00028062658,0.00012344809,0.00021735807,0.025431132,0.009363233,0.0011926516,0.14191636,0.016443882,0.00009097717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029906685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031564873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029906685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059191156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047140135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.079950094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381895764","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4480057","title":"Can Informal Judicial Norms Protect Against Political Pressure?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.014175166291427356,"score_gpt":0.2772013766154086,"score_spread":0.26302621032398127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381895764","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3253026,0.00078193104,0.013475338,0.059433784,0.00037793853,0.00012233226,0.00019915658,0.00012906834,0.6001779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916569,0.00010032523,0.00044411235,0.0022845843,0.00021207903,0.000043627835,0.00001921637,0.000023144512,0.0052161613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98586524,0.006335346,0.00046559397,0.001352884,0.0027409086,0.0032400056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91534644,0.046422455,0.015372419,0.009657497,0.007875418,0.0053257854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015164033,0.00038575477,0.0005786126,0.0023285865,0.005310563,0.010420993,0.0018027647,0.0060589514,0.020595519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07640967,0.00046086853,0.00036602907,0.0015843583,0.02154557,0.007975407,0.004549451,0.0052104997,0.0020184268],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007945552,0.00017666972,0.011688426,0.000072466326,0.00004036341,0.00018226741,0.010427796,0.00036569603,0.0005824331,0.9525204,0.005105964,0.01875806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016646557,0.00013831945,0.019024521,0.00023256365,0.000058645266,0.00015134792,0.012925229,0.0011992032,0.00084868324,0.9253629,0.039843313,0.000048862246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003550513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005607725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020595519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020618925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051142387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08019602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382064905","doi":"10.1017/s0003055423000606","title":"Social Capital, Institutional Rules, and Constitutional Amendment Rates","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"University of Maryland, Baltimore County","keywords":"Constitutional amendment; Social capital; Political science; Politics; Amendment; First amendment; Democracy; Law; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.055987379608976845,"score_gpt":0.40014877691334616,"score_spread":0.34416139730436934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382064905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96000177,0.0021057588,0.0013479196,0.002864042,0.00004819817,0.000023805891,0.00029168435,0.000013746713,0.03330308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99893314,0.00030659663,0.000098760385,0.000057833047,0.00002862957,0.000004901503,0.00007304092,0.0000024137055,0.0004947176],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967769,0.001364015,0.00021702633,0.0004658418,0.00063778163,0.00053861836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9566438,0.021244572,0.017314743,0.0018349104,0.0013444285,0.0016175131],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036760701,0.00010660225,0.00029474826,0.0016948316,0.00065502926,0.0022902763,0.00042028565,0.00051532337,0.0064578764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033703934,0.00012131899,0.00021469276,0.0028566741,0.0022580493,0.0014536171,0.0007394813,0.00080940605,0.00029278046],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026193756,0.00033168375,0.81634724,0.00021528648,0.0003936741,0.00027264378,0.0019292065,0.0040276125,0.00078422064,0.089851044,0.003353483,0.082232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004287907,0.00011243904,0.9524941,0.00011173077,0.00012894851,0.00010885365,0.0019901008,0.0016677981,0.00027237498,0.031788476,0.011254005,0.000028254328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069641485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013311739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069641485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013663169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010275523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021603703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382279534","doi":"10.1515/9780228004639-007","title":"Quebec, Bengal, and the Rise of Authoritarian Legal Pluralism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; BENGAL; Pluralism (philosophy); Political science; Legal pluralism; Ancient history; Law; History; Democracy; Philosophy; Epistemology; Archaeology; Legal realism; Legal profession; Politics","score_opus":0.01953587703652543,"score_gpt":0.22141338888067325,"score_spread":0.20187751184414782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382279534","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04312633,0.0261441,0.0005220079,0.065794066,0.00057943823,0.000048180536,0.00034890018,0.00005241407,0.8633845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77662766,0.0062835156,0.0005126394,0.008547805,0.0002609336,0.00004592282,0.00007765415,0.00006773504,0.20757608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962451,0.0008403696,0.00007645121,0.0002665144,0.0009154459,0.0016560523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967168,0.0009965574,0.00019986976,0.00029792948,0.0013799032,0.00040885023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021989704,0.00036138503,0.00046211347,0.0016354262,0.020639712,0.013299751,0.001771086,0.0034162889,0.014185464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004878021,0.00032098792,0.00028682617,0.0038330227,0.015602728,0.0027699894,0.0025562698,0.0057201707,0.0006231869],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027818209,0.000015018138,0.00075752457,0.000054843087,0.000009914386,0.00019653274,0.009662547,0.00014063816,0.00014805148,0.9394479,0.037553012,0.011986163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038401402,0.00001914662,0.011706652,0.0003933571,0.000032242253,0.00014352547,0.0141254235,0.00039374517,0.0003324247,0.06626857,0.90647036,0.00007616556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9716384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9871294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10263465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10263465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06592122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74467003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382365192","doi":"10.1017/9781009072144.005","title":"Narratives of Education and Constraint","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"International Institute for Sustainable Development","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Rationality; Normative; Political science; Corporate governance; Constraint (computer-aided design); Epistemology; Law; Engineering; Management; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03922363102266783,"score_gpt":0.2503923463930196,"score_spread":0.21116871537035178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382365192","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029685726,0.0067392346,0.008695095,0.03931928,0.00039988908,0.000042474443,0.00009152562,0.000045420733,0.9149814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88657904,0.0047623394,0.0018656785,0.005205575,0.00020359029,0.000102571175,0.00009768312,0.00006413417,0.1011194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960108,0.002589308,0.00009510301,0.00029163557,0.00055836636,0.00045470303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99754363,0.0016905968,0.00018431795,0.00020372156,0.00018997326,0.00018761697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036456457,0.00051656074,0.00035791387,0.0009961501,0.0074365092,0.008003899,0.0008011669,0.0019213348,0.0072042234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066768867,0.000197964,0.000211445,0.0015813095,0.04203789,0.010963982,0.00607156,0.0049602278,0.0007167124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021214603,0.0000029547978,0.000049398237,0.000010034435,3.0701472e-7,0.000025416639,0.011034327,0.000053558415,0.000016018395,0.98552436,0.0016480337,0.0016335734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068940953,0.000007977851,0.00020158022,0.0002740716,0.0000018911019,0.00010940789,0.0303963,0.00024647056,0.00014412028,0.39363357,0.5749661,0.000011670831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012008561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009198781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012008561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010804894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00583659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07839537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382449017","doi":"10.1111/capa.12519","title":"How binding are binding guidelines? An analytical framework","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Scope (computer science); CLARITY; Political science; Management science; Law and economics; Law; Computer science; Sociology; Engineering; Chemistry","score_opus":0.1706579106197999,"score_gpt":0.3833509941849384,"score_spread":0.2126930835651385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382449017","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03232622,0.0048173177,0.24344417,0.06671295,0.0005057999,0.0007155338,0.00056102045,0.0001993122,0.6507177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8483995,0.002530496,0.12183259,0.0036295091,0.00028271053,0.00078943616,0.00025188812,0.00011318385,0.022170728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9656722,0.017676076,0.0014382208,0.0027552233,0.008648361,0.0038097957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9337644,0.041353844,0.0045922073,0.0025999947,0.01606487,0.0016246953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023584927,0.0013164718,0.001196848,0.019103672,0.015691316,0.020481462,0.0057277395,0.0073328963,0.009084191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052926462,0.0010321912,0.0015033917,0.012888961,0.06433027,0.014221342,0.006874041,0.006214162,0.000895149],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010221528,0.000004667057,0.00015727429,0.000016650787,0.0000017277417,0.000028196382,0.0017030106,0.00020104756,0.000011041419,0.9958455,0.00067529,0.0013546027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007632219,0.0000090701,0.00085030484,0.0004041487,0.000025561721,0.00007415211,0.011190508,0.0038383433,0.00012659989,0.9329979,0.050438706,0.000037008136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25258705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22742313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25258705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047721133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036219407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5022336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382985363","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v16n3p21","title":"Anglo-American Elements of Constitutional Organization in the Constitutional Arrangement of Bosnia and Herzegovina: An Influence on Rule of Law through Legislative Function","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Legislature; Law; Normative; Constitutional review; Political science; Politics; Constitutional law; Rule of law; Constitutional court; Law and economics; Constitution; Sociology","score_opus":0.02970376498961123,"score_gpt":0.3154254541413992,"score_spread":0.28572168915178797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382985363","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48498243,0.0056581227,0.005775549,0.0043558124,0.00009960807,0.000051844956,0.00009222077,0.000019028019,0.49896538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99399084,0.0005776308,0.0007504284,0.00026320113,0.000038083992,0.000015686368,0.00002003298,0.0000033744197,0.0043407613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886876,0.00045653907,0.00003360917,0.00018973064,0.00014749993,0.00030382635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962604,0.00013863706,0.000098254226,0.00003870335,0.000053923402,0.00004428196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018717671,0.00015326981,0.00015150468,0.00090685516,0.0021577463,0.0039800503,0.00043422965,0.00044400396,0.0028489626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013163835,0.00012928518,0.00012221806,0.0009864363,0.0054556252,0.0014598026,0.0010520918,0.0009365924,0.00015518496],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023573997,0.000021025235,0.003933996,0.000024627003,0.000009853361,0.000101605336,0.005425172,0.00031758012,0.0007236322,0.9736066,0.0005367082,0.015275703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104401915,0.00022562871,0.26816177,0.00060387107,0.00013707984,0.0003968807,0.019807026,0.0024106882,0.0029456397,0.3821879,0.3229133,0.000105873005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021342842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033387102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021342842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044830954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027411024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042437255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383455346","doi":"10.1515/9780773571594-005","title":"Civil Liberties and Canadian Federalism","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Civil liberties; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.020453209986756395,"score_gpt":0.20842510775721967,"score_spread":0.18797189777046328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383455346","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01949202,0.01537654,0.0007169626,0.056302674,0.00066521834,0.000037819245,0.0005066444,0.00008566246,0.9068164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50412244,0.0114829345,0.002054678,0.012281202,0.0004205808,0.00006562022,0.00033345772,0.00011902712,0.46912014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959638,0.0003685992,0.000071092356,0.00033270862,0.0013807674,0.001882958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99776673,0.00052990403,0.00008589521,0.00016995014,0.0009639301,0.00048358037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023154588,0.0005075521,0.0005803107,0.0043127956,0.024921486,0.011769743,0.0019603018,0.0040104324,0.024489209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069340337,0.0007067174,0.0006483541,0.0064943493,0.014515744,0.0026959646,0.0028239836,0.007725249,0.0009648597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001000127,0.0000065399863,0.0002628151,0.000023062634,0.0000041666854,0.000029713436,0.0016597823,0.00018661976,0.000027343476,0.9556728,0.034860972,0.007256299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003081721,0.000007448332,0.006282952,0.00018454177,0.000024885852,0.000043509364,0.0026371337,0.00037833385,0.000116386815,0.13601589,0.8542233,0.000054794815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9949669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9977059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21058033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21058033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20391984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9156149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383455740","doi":"10.1515/9780773573062-006","title":"Constitutional Politics in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.020645569629493973,"score_gpt":0.21707438425508446,"score_spread":0.19642881462559048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383455740","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026071053,0.019811679,0.00083023665,0.08720388,0.0011736491,0.00009634552,0.0010943834,0.0001126218,0.86360615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29779243,0.007972376,0.0011041468,0.015771003,0.00025358796,0.00010316519,0.00032795352,0.00014589487,0.67652947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943749,0.00060235686,0.00010237268,0.0005384353,0.0018661113,0.002515823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99640685,0.00065726665,0.00009316841,0.00015371866,0.0016551535,0.0010337573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022150204,0.00063534075,0.0008734214,0.0030556151,0.0371955,0.01716464,0.0022616305,0.0054909824,0.034773495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0085932575,0.0007718315,0.00062406005,0.006411168,0.00961603,0.002579353,0.0032457581,0.006966807,0.0018277647],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002521988,0.000029702116,0.0012751971,0.00006440264,0.000014849974,0.00015838718,0.003306413,0.00059251185,0.00008611075,0.78273475,0.19270518,0.019007346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021920574,0.000010441403,0.0052114194,0.00022013095,0.000025393898,0.000042158383,0.0050584897,0.0006034402,0.00014135969,0.043737322,0.94486845,0.000059537222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99663395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23040816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23040816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36786318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89261746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384070204","doi":"10.1007/s41020-023-00196-x","title":"Critical constitutionalism: An inquiry into the past, present, and future","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jindal Global Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Politics; Democracy; Law; Objectivity (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Political economy; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05658166047038281,"score_gpt":0.3959888398842407,"score_spread":0.3394071794138579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384070204","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018105283,0.09935748,0.011091131,0.6003736,0.0045459857,0.000060927807,0.00016165776,0.00005218056,0.26625174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9032157,0.029502181,0.0034496156,0.04234513,0.007623338,0.00017428673,0.00009712357,0.00008507206,0.01350753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871634,0.007278299,0.0004465394,0.0014825924,0.0025739146,0.0010551595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9571821,0.03522921,0.00151309,0.0016469328,0.0034240838,0.0010045669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022517474,0.00034697232,0.0007982403,0.004480223,0.008000939,0.016994588,0.0021028216,0.008005137,0.004587142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044964883,0.00037617068,0.00061796495,0.0034167154,0.05327185,0.010796498,0.0027958266,0.011996167,0.000268024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002572454,0.000005255173,0.000070314105,0.00004332724,0.000002508704,0.00001427069,0.0006071537,0.00003964689,0.000022931948,0.9917129,0.0045884964,0.0028906956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013859081,0.000009961324,0.000426855,0.00045233796,0.000009623986,0.000037708836,0.0017061153,0.00019378192,0.00011701583,0.88762325,0.10939724,0.000012396738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007840302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01075388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022517474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010212837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021413423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11908519},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384078865","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4507012","title":"Electoral College and Election Fraud","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Spoilt vote; Electoral college; Law; General election; Group voting ticket; Voting; Politics","score_opus":0.014585767601423149,"score_gpt":0.28575665904984376,"score_spread":0.2711708914484206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384078865","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8038521,0.0033485496,0.0006222593,0.060750104,0.000335934,0.000051197585,0.00016557421,0.000021325728,0.13085295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931537,0.00043274683,0.000030269603,0.0010338342,0.0002052198,0.000007546954,0.000030585048,0.00000476271,0.005101385],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99328905,0.0030531604,0.00025667105,0.00033881163,0.0006414663,0.0024208385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93732953,0.03227259,0.012690874,0.002594697,0.0035513858,0.011560931],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007968223,0.0001912848,0.00061690866,0.005553434,0.0075412253,0.008055462,0.0011314352,0.0055454844,0.030943027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07143751,0.00028679502,0.00037220918,0.0049416465,0.0072136116,0.004562931,0.004870689,0.0057632513,0.0013784269],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00094108854,0.0025278826,0.48479098,0.00012448162,0.000099988225,0.0012504681,0.013093198,0.0007953387,0.00016074683,0.3811011,0.026909612,0.08820502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037333724,0.0004215831,0.52824926,0.00042710826,0.00019861374,0.0020525062,0.06299768,0.0049415375,0.0006855236,0.30368355,0.0958485,0.000120828096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010709296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013975265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030943027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002825191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044121174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10351479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384166938","doi":"10.1515/9780773570573-005","title":"Judicial Supervision of the Political Process: Canadian and American Responses to Homosexual Rights Challenges","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Process (computing); Political science; Political process; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.030889609094539274,"score_gpt":0.24606724759470083,"score_spread":0.21517763850016156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384166938","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14434472,0.008135091,0.00077285676,0.2884507,0.0010009524,0.00008602469,0.00018381851,0.000049145372,0.55697674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9042875,0.0038377421,0.00045267784,0.023103273,0.00032269093,0.000043548527,0.000058013637,0.000047242724,0.06784737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9836415,0.0026587537,0.00020096195,0.00071593135,0.005085516,0.0076973103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98235875,0.0069746803,0.0006994133,0.0004345801,0.005806242,0.0037264142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010539081,0.00038795237,0.0005630047,0.0026614,0.050967526,0.01726795,0.0035777586,0.010820567,0.008631765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029825607,0.0005204696,0.00046772978,0.0053294343,0.029892761,0.0028020153,0.0044849105,0.012962965,0.000353431],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008329474,0.00005792196,0.0031335885,0.00005199523,0.000011425367,0.00038720382,0.09998025,0.00034557914,0.00021753271,0.7813648,0.08962956,0.024736818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013028651,0.000040584593,0.034582872,0.00044236032,0.00006499727,0.0002548704,0.190747,0.0006897815,0.00049554027,0.06378093,0.7085773,0.00019358209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9914255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99638855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14832433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14832433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31753737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98782307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384196419","doi":"10.1515/9780773568891-004","title":"Judicial Politics in Canada: Patterns and Trends","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0214145504689917,"score_gpt":0.21879007752483856,"score_spread":0.19737552705584685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384196419","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7189402,0.06001182,0.0006422526,0.08957651,0.00038510174,0.00012365919,0.024422111,0.00032296646,0.1055754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9283111,0.023248872,0.00061852793,0.004491725,0.00016346789,0.000055141354,0.0045749033,0.00015017089,0.03838612],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99320227,0.00035063757,0.00022844922,0.0005833866,0.0026736045,0.002961748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97251666,0.0032270222,0.0035607507,0.00035098867,0.013602192,0.0067423317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002327706,0.00039495117,0.00086762215,0.012953073,0.013395604,0.011675895,0.0035863705,0.0028347487,0.011888806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01587824,0.0008385233,0.0005887681,0.04344113,0.0060691717,0.0023946795,0.0025753654,0.0033703058,0.0010701051],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005593677,0.0002206191,0.48431712,0.00096898654,0.00027473096,0.00058002013,0.038722865,0.0013703274,0.00095683796,0.08159419,0.20449677,0.18593813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031509644,0.000027418639,0.87440956,0.00041021456,0.00004885748,0.00011750305,0.018645665,0.0005538192,0.00021403295,0.0015126417,0.10394364,0.00008512977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1583656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1583656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24455337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9761766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384253395","doi":"10.1515/9780773570573-006","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada and the Complexity of Judicial Activism","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Judicial activism; Law; Judicial review","score_opus":0.03441533953848956,"score_gpt":0.21658885261014196,"score_spread":0.18217351307165242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384253395","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039688334,0.021650137,0.0023760444,0.09681142,0.00030024716,0.000044971985,0.00021609398,0.00003514856,0.8388777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.948441,0.0049555963,0.0010183397,0.0074411323,0.00032456403,0.00004612916,0.00006510754,0.00004629337,0.03766174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98898226,0.002335573,0.00014178624,0.000953001,0.0033940284,0.0041933325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885676,0.006715312,0.00048243132,0.0004890334,0.0024158289,0.0013297611],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004960013,0.0004391123,0.0009851664,0.0036543768,0.025840279,0.027196405,0.0027865588,0.0090238815,0.00897225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019838747,0.00062351074,0.00051006756,0.0066877524,0.05296594,0.0064904396,0.0037069588,0.008320629,0.00039803205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005469882,0.000005101248,0.00028701912,0.000014280522,0.0000051933257,0.000039022256,0.0031007647,0.00030075043,0.000031885906,0.9853572,0.0073546474,0.0034987337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025736097,0.0000066480375,0.005010659,0.00030454138,0.000030889943,0.000044837572,0.010438544,0.0013159951,0.00009712461,0.7770963,0.20557806,0.00005061046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9602332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9802634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12968011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12968011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16241582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9408995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384255512","doi":"10.1515/9780773575622-006","title":"The Federal Accountability Act: How Ottawa Steps Backward in Monitoring Political Ethics and Integrity","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Politics; Political science; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.07145389797335919,"score_gpt":0.3037481346411447,"score_spread":0.2322942366677855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384255512","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013359969,0.019642789,0.010413573,0.34319732,0.0037646093,0.0002327226,0.001451065,0.00044563515,0.6074923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5646045,0.016616073,0.038044296,0.057870436,0.0012414939,0.0005463857,0.000674881,0.0005732345,0.31982872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97120696,0.010865891,0.0015297233,0.0016732647,0.010576347,0.004147773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96623856,0.017096827,0.0014909984,0.0027550478,0.009839226,0.0025794446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019574596,0.0008743581,0.0010536896,0.00609803,0.018064843,0.030876568,0.0035460924,0.010915854,0.006010993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.069179036,0.002009248,0.0008656416,0.005022096,0.02032348,0.015141895,0.0051662973,0.01501778,0.0012415141],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038451475,0.000022614373,0.002864755,0.00012982177,0.00004097786,0.000082756706,0.006357313,0.00078679435,0.000100606856,0.7833621,0.16633576,0.039878022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022750515,0.00002992804,0.0127926115,0.0012294995,0.00013405604,0.00006148641,0.008933329,0.0011590039,0.0006101351,0.3160654,0.6586334,0.0003284018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.915478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9736406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08452201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08263616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19858375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59957016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384256279","doi":"10.1515/9780773568891-020","title":"Public Opinion and Canada’s Courts","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public opinion; Political science; Law; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.03717498801793726,"score_gpt":0.22272849209530027,"score_spread":0.185553504077363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384256279","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027931461,0.011960258,0.0008645167,0.19745682,0.00096185243,0.000058243986,0.0006122652,0.00009221625,0.76006234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5220161,0.0049502733,0.0009555128,0.04012425,0.0006148793,0.00008773978,0.0002383989,0.00013774766,0.43087506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98878634,0.0010636597,0.00016259085,0.0007120992,0.003787709,0.005487659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99042106,0.003025986,0.00029196666,0.00033657404,0.0040395986,0.0018848133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004960362,0.0005733996,0.00079779467,0.0033780779,0.038318053,0.026490575,0.0034252456,0.015205421,0.02718105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017875642,0.0010090715,0.0007681831,0.0061072246,0.016195372,0.004967121,0.0038740751,0.013927956,0.0015173625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002061319,0.00002263683,0.00078639464,0.00003622561,0.000010753247,0.00016269818,0.0034405056,0.00030009268,0.0000679593,0.85489523,0.1291432,0.0111137545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005173823,0.00001543282,0.0067938324,0.00032775747,0.000041474745,0.00007706078,0.0065890294,0.00083954737,0.0002663933,0.11520108,0.8696803,0.000116353745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9947166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99752647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20836663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20836663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35172084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9181825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384519851","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4512508","title":"Electoral College and Election Fraud","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.014585767601423149,"score_gpt":0.28575665904984376,"score_spread":0.2711708914484206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384519851","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8038521,0.0033485496,0.0006222593,0.060750104,0.000335934,0.000051197585,0.00016557421,0.000021325728,0.13085295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931537,0.00043274683,0.000030269603,0.0010338342,0.0002052198,0.000007546954,0.000030585048,0.00000476271,0.005101385],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99328905,0.0030531604,0.00025667105,0.00033881163,0.0006414663,0.0024208385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93732953,0.03227259,0.012690874,0.002594697,0.0035513858,0.011560931],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007968223,0.0001912848,0.00061690866,0.005553434,0.0075412253,0.008055462,0.0011314352,0.0055454844,0.030943027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07143751,0.00028679502,0.00037220918,0.0049416465,0.0072136116,0.004562931,0.004870689,0.0057632513,0.0013784269],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00094108854,0.0025278826,0.48479098,0.00012448162,0.000099988225,0.0012504681,0.013093198,0.0007953387,0.00016074683,0.3811011,0.026909612,0.08820502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037333724,0.0004215831,0.52824926,0.00042710826,0.00019861374,0.0020525062,0.06299768,0.0049415375,0.0006855236,0.30368355,0.0958485,0.000120828096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010709296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013975265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030943027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002825191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044121174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10351479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384659488","doi":"10.33774/apsa-2021-kcnvt-v2","title":"Social Capital, Institutional Rules, and Constitutional Amendment Rates","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional amendment; Social capital; Political science; Amendment; Politics; Democracy; Law; First amendment; Law and economics; Transaction cost; Constitutional law; Economics","score_opus":0.09495986462048388,"score_gpt":0.35524443923939936,"score_spread":0.26028457461891547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384659488","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9832201,0.00028716403,0.0010879859,0.00079158886,0.000017596583,0.0000143714215,0.0002248849,0.00001392922,0.01434243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99924254,0.000056000477,0.00010585552,0.00002148392,0.000013116448,0.0000041721387,0.0000881708,0.0000031632983,0.00046557092],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99715793,0.0010047806,0.00022391182,0.00049928646,0.00054661185,0.00056752353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94383436,0.029874304,0.02036693,0.0028353937,0.0010953258,0.0019937733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028853635,0.00014978468,0.00036626242,0.0014766811,0.0007661183,0.0029631655,0.00044296926,0.00060072215,0.009871901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037644334,0.000127667,0.00022971073,0.0026823364,0.0026313122,0.0016746449,0.0010373099,0.0009185598,0.00045388954],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029543767,0.00036809003,0.8992418,0.00008843197,0.00022847317,0.00025362012,0.0019333276,0.0039113555,0.00092655094,0.044983204,0.0016267478,0.046142906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043629385,0.00012389092,0.95248115,0.000058337046,0.00009688986,0.00013009389,0.0028171614,0.0033273036,0.0005374032,0.034722757,0.005628166,0.00003318256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054931287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008179128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009871901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012127021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007133289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033024788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385075537","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3894","title":"Social Rights and Transformative Private Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Private law; Legitimacy; Political science; Public law; Law; Law and economics; Doctrine; Sociology; Legal pluralism; International human rights law; Transformative learning; Comparative law; Human rights; Legal realism","score_opus":0.034893339934751466,"score_gpt":0.3089457904656493,"score_spread":0.27405245053089783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385075537","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09541955,0.004159254,0.034067743,0.04649497,0.00020264421,0.000073108895,0.000052330495,0.000089338486,0.819441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892755,0.0006576311,0.001808396,0.0007897137,0.0001033287,0.000030441946,0.00001519879,0.000025484514,0.007294337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898906,0.004851907,0.0002986819,0.0012457204,0.0021375476,0.0015755659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928606,0.0037384352,0.00077080564,0.0015562626,0.0006337159,0.00044025428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009152137,0.00036151474,0.0003855033,0.0024909521,0.008308609,0.013622272,0.0011514248,0.0031521867,0.0051255887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009324744,0.00025877036,0.0005616995,0.0017824449,0.10880385,0.01302323,0.009750951,0.0051896,0.00042661477],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.246681e-7,0.0000027377146,0.000059274633,0.00000387529,7.0580535e-7,0.000012642536,0.0015879145,0.00006241703,0.000020633463,0.9968624,0.000104853745,0.0012818294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005519527,0.0000067889273,0.00028817024,0.000053185893,0.000002599087,0.00003618084,0.0033138,0.00024764574,0.0001460795,0.969144,0.026749786,0.0000062981076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006418939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006241356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013622272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012915504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008539852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09370899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385080226","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3875","title":"The Notwithstanding Clause in Canada: The First Forty Years","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Period (music); Law; Political science; Physics","score_opus":0.03167387430752809,"score_gpt":0.2660268809878027,"score_spread":0.2343530066802746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385080226","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58186084,0.034999527,0.0011319347,0.025466243,0.00071363105,0.00010521898,0.0010937063,0.000054621465,0.3545743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95219386,0.006028596,0.00045642396,0.002940766,0.000057732428,0.000018914783,0.00018592906,0.00003569562,0.038082045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99132884,0.0005023093,0.00013733654,0.00041362696,0.0047597,0.002858064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923608,0.0013883192,0.00073220907,0.00030756133,0.004269975,0.00094123464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004064098,0.000234289,0.0004253985,0.00298574,0.01831537,0.0069729453,0.0011602793,0.002016455,0.0025089157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011674739,0.0005160789,0.0002740204,0.005890228,0.009171711,0.0019006504,0.0028782252,0.004218211,0.00017686568],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012953233,0.0000615483,0.042198867,0.00036061453,0.000057213503,0.0025539265,0.16834562,0.00087862,0.0015983725,0.60797155,0.06258799,0.1132562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071284535,0.00003329977,0.073042944,0.0004125487,0.000031169497,0.00040108836,0.029337818,0.00036672025,0.0008263775,0.00498137,0.8904381,0.00012145207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98918927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99536586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11344016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11344016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15207124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8230698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385212695","doi":"10.5465/amproc.2023.19703abstract","title":"Guilty Until Proven Otherwise: High Status and the Burden of Proof Under Socialism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Proceedings","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Burden of proof; Socialism; Proof of concept; Political science; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Law; Communism; Operating system; Politics","score_opus":0.03143443190279614,"score_gpt":0.3046232033164537,"score_spread":0.27318877141365755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385212695","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40456077,0.0019953207,0.03371478,0.07743853,0.0005065542,0.000101761776,0.000079291385,0.00006679259,0.48153618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955894,0.00014453694,0.00079929014,0.0012116273,0.0001740855,0.000021008424,0.000008019564,0.000011869838,0.0020402086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9739319,0.013630297,0.00086954643,0.002775835,0.005884285,0.0029080377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91825587,0.0520695,0.00980025,0.008555913,0.007334408,0.0039839745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029200843,0.00033998484,0.0006557801,0.002787998,0.0074894014,0.008970627,0.0015145715,0.0036948519,0.009056548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.081582405,0.00038081533,0.00049908954,0.0013785707,0.068068214,0.012660842,0.008523472,0.0060888617,0.0004959844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043635173,0.000023511811,0.0047474164,0.000026368167,0.0000133427575,0.00019290509,0.007850124,0.00019421476,0.00014835752,0.97722185,0.001360042,0.008178273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046675028,0.00005975199,0.0045106565,0.00014451744,0.000018929539,0.00021936827,0.0049954923,0.0007385937,0.00028476515,0.9700557,0.018897835,0.000027682461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004229422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029487552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029200843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005012852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005197611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15443063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385259658","doi":"10.4337/ccs.2023.0001","title":"The old Commonwealth model of constitutionalism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Constitutional Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Constitutionalism; Sovereignty; Law; Constitution; Political science; Constitutional theory; Commonwealth; Constitutional law; Scholarship; Popular sovereignty; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Politics; Sociology; Democracy; Geography","score_opus":0.3310488656314156,"score_gpt":0.44505130988060854,"score_spread":0.11400244424919292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385259658","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02545507,0.0054863845,0.12242983,0.03787792,0.0005593145,0.00014370812,0.0001689363,0.00011314546,0.8077657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9180181,0.002840775,0.023014745,0.0040980787,0.00082619366,0.00044823537,0.0000963551,0.0001205535,0.0505369],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906155,0.004491716,0.00032694312,0.0017201661,0.0021212725,0.00072435953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944804,0.00260486,0.00038855686,0.0013529019,0.00085035834,0.0003228797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008574972,0.00039934518,0.0006941712,0.0037613378,0.0055116364,0.009535618,0.0018341289,0.0034579197,0.0060944594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0122864675,0.00036410568,0.0006635152,0.0030560235,0.06548661,0.011265453,0.0050481316,0.004734252,0.0008604074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.6777624e-7,9.212234e-7,0.000019670662,0.000004336635,7.076736e-7,0.0000028594113,0.00020776254,0.000033157594,0.000006940267,0.99898654,0.00017752271,0.0005587161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006145923,0.0000048204033,0.00010549127,0.000032037293,0.000001964936,0.000019430117,0.00015813705,0.0001879332,0.000025505382,0.9702617,0.02919338,0.0000034127058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0116757685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073196874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0116757685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011119528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068353014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080678225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385312408","doi":"10.1515/9781553394518-010","title":"The Jurisprudence of “Canada’s Fundamental Values” and Appointment to the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.014385958855285182,"score_gpt":0.2082360322278692,"score_spread":0.19385007337258403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385312408","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019333081,0.008727036,0.0011489078,0.08062666,0.00080509705,0.00003652019,0.0001842758,0.000031919186,0.88910663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8115391,0.0032387036,0.0010514646,0.022864068,0.00029817576,0.0000566573,0.00007566251,0.00008641581,0.16078973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912884,0.0014478153,0.00012820885,0.00069445575,0.002603325,0.0038377778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958125,0.0013958531,0.00015321175,0.00017430942,0.0015930991,0.0008709468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038422502,0.00038053608,0.0005684396,0.0018060019,0.032615747,0.017040892,0.002560676,0.009539528,0.0059169675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010268781,0.0006948526,0.00042820172,0.003400878,0.031082453,0.0029527687,0.0026187457,0.012307786,0.00046683382],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044432245,0.000003238158,0.00016014214,0.000008324709,0.0000023945545,0.000033565633,0.0030834358,0.00008681473,0.000023037532,0.97259897,0.022049977,0.0019456003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029026312,0.000008949976,0.004098411,0.00037200676,0.000024086961,0.00007262085,0.009319986,0.0005209087,0.00019348059,0.2720863,0.71318203,0.00009227983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9891439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99567235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15256646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15256646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.268644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98290277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385312418","doi":"10.1515/9781553394518-025","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada: A Chronology of Change","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Chronology; Supreme court; Law; Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.038366912421844986,"score_gpt":0.2205249870384467,"score_spread":0.18215807461660172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385312418","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04022198,0.08254411,0.0022729218,0.1933012,0.002011979,0.00011092564,0.0018117235,0.0001382161,0.6775869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8092389,0.034479816,0.0027497355,0.019163946,0.0005989356,0.00008524317,0.0005533609,0.0002714681,0.1328586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927093,0.0009599866,0.00013754537,0.00064092554,0.002935481,0.0026168684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99276936,0.001384318,0.0002788212,0.00020021657,0.0039816913,0.0013855966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00272116,0.0006070426,0.0007240804,0.0075971824,0.03056863,0.024866516,0.002873036,0.005829356,0.013670112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014237215,0.0006756426,0.00037839418,0.016398717,0.031422053,0.006520531,0.0031530093,0.008053455,0.0007197322],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019424286,0.000016910588,0.0013142623,0.00008297624,0.000009775717,0.00012623872,0.021027245,0.00032382028,0.000087021406,0.859479,0.09311859,0.024394808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001127991,0.0000089894065,0.008893024,0.0006159671,0.000015675994,0.000062452076,0.023674812,0.00041555995,0.00013361576,0.062268592,0.9038395,0.000060524853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99543107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9977422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29645106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.29645106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36335307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81601703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385312627","doi":"10.1515/9781553394518-016","title":"Reform of the Supreme Court of Canada from With in: To What Extent Should the Court Weigh in Regarding Constitutional Conventions?*","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Constitutional court; Remand (court procedure); Constitution","score_opus":0.02698722727730596,"score_gpt":0.21979074309123428,"score_spread":0.19280351581392832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385312627","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046187416,0.013701135,0.0022145002,0.32055137,0.0023324462,0.00011344528,0.00060661964,0.00011721343,0.6141759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7533724,0.0035941121,0.0018563629,0.05975803,0.0005633875,0.00007333708,0.00012701891,0.000109514185,0.18054584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898004,0.001356772,0.0001464942,0.00093373714,0.0034846817,0.0042778295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99408346,0.0012415695,0.00018266647,0.00023020867,0.0029802467,0.0012819417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005301706,0.0005647977,0.0008496888,0.0018179726,0.0316176,0.018227916,0.004189646,0.011092473,0.008173019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020189576,0.0006872444,0.0005235875,0.0031781574,0.013981351,0.004112348,0.0027871178,0.01373163,0.00058948743],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025411406,0.000017121663,0.0009619792,0.000038422037,0.000023576416,0.00011820676,0.0034585113,0.00053140585,0.00017000764,0.8854968,0.09941594,0.009742564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007273923,0.000026472675,0.010358271,0.0005486806,0.00014271426,0.000074666015,0.011854724,0.002085039,0.0008521895,0.1789471,0.79482937,0.00020800042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9936326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17114945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17114945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32624507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9613491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385317210","doi":"10.59962/9780774867931-025","title":"The Invisible Transformation of Canada’s Constitutional Amendment Rules","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Amendment; Constitutional amendment; Transformation (genetics); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Constitution; Chemistry","score_opus":0.018925214821572434,"score_gpt":0.19127580911242686,"score_spread":0.17235059429085442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385317210","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020272594,0.0037787484,0.0017940182,0.05623964,0.0008079636,0.00003767266,0.0002646154,0.00007408067,0.91673064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.721359,0.0020751532,0.0013144416,0.013223006,0.0002463731,0.00004911243,0.000101984144,0.00016139814,0.26146957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99039614,0.0015041317,0.000120563534,0.0007062805,0.004220574,0.0030522568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935916,0.00223117,0.0001563267,0.00057469704,0.0025923806,0.0008537505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048927804,0.00045814188,0.0005225121,0.0023895998,0.02162131,0.022242611,0.0027586375,0.005442449,0.014110364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015605548,0.00071435206,0.0004678105,0.0030750846,0.027960652,0.004114272,0.0028463576,0.010618913,0.0011312319],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000091841175,0.000009398084,0.00018847578,0.0000116527835,0.0000040550385,0.000051021874,0.0038688476,0.00026000137,0.00007286464,0.9513989,0.035866443,0.008259076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025196621,0.000010234685,0.0027335265,0.00022162216,0.000023220298,0.000036572626,0.0063780025,0.0008962935,0.0003818169,0.16974786,0.81947297,0.000072697985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9876052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9937279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14431886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14431886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24945052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99246883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385510020","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1423","title":"Triage and Dissensus at the Supreme Court of Canada: A Review of the Court’s 2020 Constitutional Decisions","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Dissenting opinion; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Precedent; Constitutional court; Scholarship; Constitution","score_opus":0.08471932435059226,"score_gpt":0.34456676063460734,"score_spread":0.2598474362840151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385510020","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016095197,0.9581986,0.00016737115,0.024220156,0.00079944124,0.000058420967,0.00023928967,0.000012652653,0.01469457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.056877844,0.9034907,0.0010352185,0.03240828,0.0008282925,0.000113707945,0.00042905484,0.00003463841,0.0047821277],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9784492,0.0030070983,0.0015128854,0.0012890014,0.01367989,0.00206183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9475242,0.020980578,0.0018705851,0.0007444567,0.027170856,0.001709224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028069656,0.0007466463,0.0015291345,0.013919215,0.009538303,0.0109387,0.0044596368,0.006321474,0.002135409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05682015,0.0012372996,0.0009818802,0.025876336,0.009908088,0.0027229413,0.0020717504,0.0077780336,0.0005468753],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010145559,0.00008926899,0.002270213,0.0123051815,0.0002580915,0.0008158559,0.0057590907,0.0008033746,0.0007241503,0.16070646,0.38768193,0.42848492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030971376,0.000031223306,0.006429217,0.017371463,0.00021155871,0.00014833674,0.0015591034,0.00013460296,0.00031156756,0.0043762927,0.96931106,0.00008457608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9132079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9489158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10685386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10685386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30914113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7752826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385511486","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1414","title":"The Right to Vote and Freedom of Expression in Political Process Cases Under the Charter","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Constitutionality; Redistricting; Political science; Charter; Supreme court; Voting; Law; Politics; Campaign finance; Section (typography); Election law; Public administration; Business","score_opus":0.038654659610531356,"score_gpt":0.3395399228910601,"score_spread":0.3008852632805288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385511486","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.067850426,0.003115893,0.00877813,0.026457796,0.0006037993,0.0003621628,0.0005572099,0.00007355553,0.89220107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92324036,0.0012209344,0.0033508893,0.012061889,0.00045498417,0.00035481137,0.00021414002,0.00004949644,0.05905247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9759975,0.005036234,0.0009948396,0.001761837,0.008129046,0.008080537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98771995,0.007913692,0.00069690787,0.0009731706,0.0018735442,0.00082265364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017685827,0.00043321584,0.0008565072,0.002280875,0.015589026,0.014418285,0.0022650182,0.008998227,0.0050262026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026523124,0.0007030174,0.00085099495,0.003072659,0.025303895,0.0041787024,0.0043561608,0.0105675515,0.00064509443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011281168,0.000011441862,0.00046550867,0.00001468482,0.0000029636424,0.00012780819,0.0015038159,0.00012800824,0.000104456165,0.9906024,0.004447975,0.002579681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018778357,0.0001303185,0.016660854,0.00068142405,0.00011037616,0.0004094518,0.007330828,0.0020200415,0.0021273524,0.5757448,0.3943152,0.0002815095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.69002724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8320416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30997276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023771761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056948595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6235965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385511548","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1413","title":"The Frank Dissent’s Novel Theory of the Charter: The Rhetoric and the Reality","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Dissenting opinion; Dissent; Supreme court; Law; Legislation; Political science; Rhetoric; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.04514344550061427,"score_gpt":0.31047285911309314,"score_spread":0.26532941361247886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385511548","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009702876,0.0127170095,0.033485476,0.51416224,0.005872443,0.00008765657,0.00026262575,0.00010335701,0.42360646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67383194,0.004766359,0.015383201,0.1831772,0.005562035,0.0002862244,0.00009208933,0.0001810308,0.1167199],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916216,0.0037559627,0.00022928318,0.001278478,0.0024287847,0.0006858258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99452645,0.0038438786,0.00022761305,0.00026681105,0.0009148978,0.00022029354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00917536,0.000712354,0.00060963864,0.002478895,0.010459428,0.00982664,0.002072262,0.0109199425,0.0029359204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014099508,0.00036306534,0.0007340134,0.0014547616,0.07602559,0.009666081,0.0028514278,0.0138036655,0.0006744238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033812473,0.0000017402165,0.000015194436,0.0000074062077,9.081023e-7,0.00001861228,0.0008176457,0.00003997085,0.000016347502,0.989494,0.008711379,0.0008733206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002565292,0.000009942453,0.00010006,0.000110880814,0.0000066882185,0.000059813094,0.0009788703,0.00036957453,0.00019374785,0.80407155,0.19404715,0.000026121259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09937981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09611902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09937981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01806078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015475811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19760269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385512093","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1376","title":"Comeau and Constitutional Interpretation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Originalism; Supreme court; Constitution; Original meaning; Law; Constitutionalism; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional interpretation; Political science; Meaning (existential); Jurisprudence; Constitutional law; Doctrine; Original intent; Federalism; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Politics; Democracy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05283352769002525,"score_gpt":0.32325391950510945,"score_spread":0.2704203918150842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385512093","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062842756,0.019167654,0.004683078,0.051142912,0.00072408386,0.000052078307,0.00015661404,0.00006113065,0.9177281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8415651,0.00879635,0.0046625263,0.036706403,0.0018603846,0.00025950815,0.0001870128,0.00010213777,0.1058606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99361366,0.0020729874,0.00016152905,0.0012724719,0.0017478559,0.0011315063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99740785,0.0014112563,0.00013384926,0.00028520488,0.000600851,0.00016094909],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047646873,0.00045118158,0.0006598885,0.0033535713,0.012535165,0.009251735,0.0017759933,0.006650141,0.00810244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008331806,0.00027341442,0.00075302477,0.001865774,0.036398284,0.0042392937,0.0027919859,0.006397286,0.0007477194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011853055,7.765739e-7,0.000015649024,0.0000053360136,7.7016756e-7,0.000013999242,0.00030821108,0.000015357646,0.0000064126643,0.9962825,0.0026750823,0.0006746969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016944257,0.000008870542,0.00034361193,0.00015039818,0.000009290852,0.00006272183,0.0005216131,0.00020506182,0.00011668224,0.7135018,0.28504735,0.000015753065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2420061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22909804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75799394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03370436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014198652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4811949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385512096","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1379","title":"Consultation, Cooperation and Consent in the Commons’ Court: “Manner and Form” after Mikisew Cree II","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Parliament; Constitution; Legislature; Constitutional court; Political science; Duty; Supreme court; Statute; Politics","score_opus":0.05714488711552555,"score_gpt":0.31310194961183657,"score_spread":0.255957062496311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385512096","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09376345,0.009116789,0.023744153,0.19698258,0.0018343868,0.0003389473,0.00015285653,0.000102425896,0.67396444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8950559,0.0009295022,0.0024102898,0.030218348,0.00031972944,0.00017948884,0.000036482696,0.000041193274,0.070808955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9792555,0.009947983,0.00063629297,0.0024226482,0.003721644,0.0040159207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903709,0.0071943174,0.00032431938,0.0007227287,0.0008427593,0.00054504763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018533194,0.00035102724,0.0005163003,0.00074093055,0.01679696,0.0115011595,0.002149213,0.016429642,0.0034242738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02695789,0.00060359744,0.00053220877,0.0010706363,0.04450066,0.00864878,0.007140047,0.01565951,0.00048584605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001208898,0.000004444964,0.00011913738,0.000010508739,0.0000025589675,0.00018696525,0.008815625,0.000070026166,0.00017606355,0.98379,0.0042951247,0.0025174497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008056461,0.000073083,0.0019098873,0.00031970014,0.00002508295,0.00038385083,0.0154585475,0.0007082827,0.0015667521,0.5802028,0.39910737,0.00016411107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26874945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31836993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7312505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01729003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026732001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5343703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385512951","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3155","title":"Introduction to Law, Authority &amp; History: A Tribute to Douglas Hay","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Tribute; Hay; Law; Political science; Legal history; Sociology","score_opus":0.06072710639601393,"score_gpt":0.32450558645900596,"score_spread":0.26377848006299204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385512951","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001001364,0.12825343,0.0016934274,0.62611467,0.099211305,0.000060091577,0.0004526314,0.00015952117,0.14305359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02312245,0.058981504,0.0022280626,0.21240166,0.042285755,0.00008982612,0.0004164671,0.00038532563,0.660089],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980318,0.0006150281,0.00011745675,0.00027853725,0.00067744515,0.00027974581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99677014,0.001153114,0.00017198348,0.000169731,0.0008998744,0.00083523657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028890276,0.0008352964,0.0006416362,0.002105057,0.0076435586,0.008911884,0.0013309568,0.006014111,0.036903676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057493877,0.0007006404,0.00048493964,0.0019844216,0.005348715,0.008331235,0.004266457,0.00969917,0.015470509],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034271604,0.000011112008,0.000058535483,0.000026235695,4.5188045e-7,0.000033969554,0.0005903457,0.000014578779,0.000044180433,0.014851867,0.97662723,0.007738007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010586479,0.000002180991,0.00012037309,0.00009618439,3.3432931e-7,0.000036803915,0.00042255918,0.000010220681,0.00000982874,0.0021662144,0.997131,0.0000032201312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037080828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07261402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037080828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011884941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009393539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12345511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385518153","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2991","title":"Introduction","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Constitutional law; Theme (computing); Law; Political science; Diversity (politics); Field (mathematics); Aside; Work (physics); Sociology; Comparative law; Engineering","score_opus":0.020596455352911578,"score_gpt":0.2728643914709323,"score_spread":0.2522679361180207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385518153","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00094923284,0.0033164409,0.0027361852,0.009809839,0.003211961,0.000078424826,0.0022887273,0.00031082323,0.9772983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035364904,0.0050827363,0.004654377,0.008128948,0.0025219857,0.00021442538,0.0045109293,0.00053465663,0.93898696],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780506,0.00042569818,0.00010923203,0.0006612063,0.0007307553,0.00026798385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835473,0.00031913788,0.00009569444,0.00032376283,0.00067301875,0.00023368919],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015434413,0.00061624136,0.00059207476,0.0017895619,0.0034262384,0.007758836,0.0016432804,0.0028849754,0.37464914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005041081,0.00025865863,0.00057456404,0.0022363907,0.002335066,0.0051065995,0.0038653752,0.0028493092,0.13060373],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042735315,0.000024837685,0.00051139964,0.00018808275,0.0000073118895,0.0001123359,0.0011755945,0.00009358549,0.00017285188,0.4351491,0.46325007,0.09927202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020079813,0.00000517703,0.00025374434,0.0000795122,0.0000014353037,0.000050420484,0.00018621105,0.000024680383,0.000045011235,0.010455406,0.98889273,0.000003688041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01046836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010053038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62535083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048311907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041051856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8919871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385518171","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1255","title":"Charter Litigation, Social and Economic Rights &amp; Civil Procedure","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Charter; Appeal; Political science; Law; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Human rights","score_opus":0.04032466827155654,"score_gpt":0.34451172540794245,"score_spread":0.3041870571363859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385518171","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018898726,0.010662077,0.0118451305,0.066568084,0.0009948108,0.00013447813,0.00013490357,0.000086852524,0.890675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85787845,0.008944528,0.005784171,0.026811505,0.0015591445,0.00017641557,0.00009640593,0.000054549873,0.09869494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9847526,0.0031612597,0.00037780768,0.001315737,0.0052474667,0.0051450906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949882,0.0028872774,0.00042674268,0.00041238312,0.00089756085,0.00038783692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065720403,0.0006057353,0.0005234126,0.0018857277,0.017044414,0.016842512,0.0024449166,0.012476792,0.008896071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010645518,0.0003211027,0.00093932834,0.002718188,0.04549926,0.0052681216,0.0050708847,0.00892339,0.0006601847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015023772,0.0000038418,0.00010219659,0.000008415369,0.000001007756,0.00012874852,0.0006513706,0.00012378093,0.00003395617,0.99413764,0.002776074,0.0020315112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002409965,0.000042014344,0.0028353115,0.00040363343,0.000023531373,0.0005936865,0.006088699,0.0016079609,0.0005048147,0.63795555,0.3498359,0.000084837724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.64169234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.66837925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64169234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04225827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05668699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72083557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385518207","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1341","title":"The Process of Electoral Reform in Canada: Democratic and Constitutional Constraints","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Referendum; Democratic legitimacy; Electoral reform; Democracy; Legitimacy; Political science; Process (computing); Normative; Law and economics; Constitutional amendment; Public administration; Law; Constitution; Economics; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.023882534930232638,"score_gpt":0.29163259855129775,"score_spread":0.2677500636210651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385518207","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27208692,0.010107947,0.0068622325,0.09765489,0.00040754722,0.00042618669,0.0008453789,0.00013781854,0.6114711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9631525,0.002416375,0.0018378132,0.0026413717,0.00006992536,0.00005684984,0.000120385885,0.000026843823,0.029677879],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9821998,0.0022354748,0.00041529752,0.0010851164,0.0071193813,0.006944894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99010056,0.002719618,0.0006850952,0.0005307888,0.004341248,0.0016227597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070502,0.00021526896,0.0006111457,0.0026605355,0.023124764,0.011031369,0.0019866251,0.002001076,0.0057909572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027888523,0.00050105486,0.00041552982,0.0043265857,0.009738407,0.0022873145,0.00366213,0.004511741,0.00032630074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005542213,0.00003378079,0.009219699,0.00014612052,0.000029855199,0.00023138936,0.011505317,0.002290687,0.0003884652,0.9270864,0.013104383,0.03590837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019891886,0.00007864359,0.11131633,0.00059067016,0.000168105,0.0002054361,0.028349182,0.00704243,0.0022973865,0.13240819,0.7170272,0.00031761738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9938921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99728346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21162239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21162239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3465044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9144063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385518455","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1259","title":"Taking Dialogue Theory Much too Seriously (or Perhaps Charter Dialogue Isn't Such a Good Thing after all)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Appeal; Legislature; Law; Law and economics; Judicial review; Political science; Wright; Sociology; Position (finance); Economics; History","score_opus":0.031058146041421306,"score_gpt":0.2993359278279379,"score_spread":0.26827778178651657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385518455","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020958653,0.010809367,0.07880248,0.5678114,0.0035115574,0.00006107613,0.00007804793,0.0001505738,0.31781676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87221384,0.0043916465,0.009597215,0.0737629,0.0030726849,0.0002411603,0.00006393233,0.0001625623,0.036494143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9762166,0.017218579,0.00039116867,0.0016298944,0.0029615865,0.0015821886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.965868,0.0270769,0.0018865893,0.001809094,0.002170329,0.0011891532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020000026,0.00051653566,0.00084890303,0.0013101965,0.008352492,0.012217584,0.0026771242,0.007593211,0.0075187287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035418827,0.00026121372,0.0006294825,0.001356595,0.031595435,0.023500543,0.005700367,0.0099502895,0.0014665513],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005971917,0.000010400548,0.00014995503,0.000053816188,0.0000034283598,0.00003536835,0.0076261926,0.000105676736,0.00003651404,0.9754925,0.010638801,0.005841422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014632552,0.000028009576,0.0003428738,0.00019046056,0.000008365851,0.00012202897,0.012618061,0.00046749788,0.00019809317,0.7506182,0.23537028,0.000021445108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007272658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064260983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020000026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006458975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055426136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10577148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385518626","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1244","title":"Does a Judge's Party of Appointment or Gender Matter to Case outcomes?: An Empirical Study of the Court of Appeal for Ontario","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Ideology; Law; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.08521536181734822,"score_gpt":0.3781677294555517,"score_spread":0.2929523676382035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385518626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98892164,0.00029445658,0.00006251013,0.001194,0.000009662955,0.000050522027,0.00037624946,0.0000036213244,0.009087372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99522746,0.00032598464,0.00008423137,0.00019844148,0.000014128253,0.000032210246,0.00032093193,0.000007922269,0.0037886444],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940752,0.0010848717,0.00019360983,0.0005715811,0.0024976928,0.0015770118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97417325,0.007511777,0.0073004724,0.0008731153,0.0063275597,0.0038137923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037939728,0.00027277184,0.0007169163,0.0028433464,0.0142225,0.0037140662,0.002226463,0.001274245,0.0052823233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02909837,0.00048617314,0.0005702263,0.0071400874,0.0039737243,0.0014305946,0.002203114,0.0015847167,0.00068346947],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029020503,0.00026934862,0.90220505,0.0000824248,0.00010578438,0.0011203957,0.07424535,0.00020289469,0.00057218294,0.0030285253,0.0052109607,0.012666947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029855932,0.00005979253,0.95218736,0.00008386882,0.0000367955,0.0001609972,0.038480446,0.00047644106,0.00010333933,0.00041450604,0.007932404,0.00003418413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9773719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99337846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.062901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037568245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45638084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385589511","doi":"10.59962/9780774868280-008","title":"6 The Appeals Begin in Nova Scotia’s Supreme Court","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Supreme court; Nova (rocket); Law; Political science; Art; History; Humanities; Archaeology; Engineering; Aeronautics","score_opus":0.028962897388912636,"score_gpt":0.21742272643491387,"score_spread":0.18845982904600123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385589511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010317776,0.0021849577,0.00047758917,0.021324756,0.0017063594,0.00007358935,0.00038316366,0.000060805687,0.96347106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.093993105,0.0004250953,0.0002404949,0.009560445,0.00017507093,0.000031147756,0.00009329238,0.00005785694,0.8954235],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976597,0.00026010926,0.00004901956,0.00021754963,0.00045691844,0.0013567074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982305,0.00050869124,0.0000366137,0.00009743162,0.00066658854,0.00046011654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011853961,0.0004788771,0.00056783395,0.0013955701,0.026210131,0.011209736,0.0013239508,0.010250503,0.051257543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005686764,0.0008321342,0.0005775052,0.0010678963,0.0034540866,0.002643479,0.002204131,0.009521662,0.008376994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051815965,0.000043724103,0.0011904944,0.00004343803,0.0000082634715,0.0008662563,0.005290387,0.00012965208,0.00038020758,0.3639357,0.61232805,0.015732022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016106089,0.000013929316,0.005609226,0.00017942068,0.000011960973,0.00009816264,0.0039023345,0.00018885254,0.00028478703,0.019012338,0.9706448,0.000038060247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8432953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97154635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15670472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028925462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033659123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31525517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385590588","doi":"10.59962/9780774865982-008","title":"Where Are the Women? Analyzing the Three Métis Supreme Court of Canada Decisions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Supreme Court Decisions","score_opus":0.023628173077533014,"score_gpt":0.2002085696064912,"score_spread":0.17658039652895818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385590588","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14895077,0.012784614,0.0012127189,0.10210142,0.0005415998,0.00013466405,0.0011750823,0.000046748704,0.7330523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83421355,0.0040572765,0.000948029,0.014800675,0.00012019227,0.000066348126,0.00023212096,0.00007772543,0.145484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99194455,0.0008810281,0.00008770122,0.00041505485,0.002093212,0.004578462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99354714,0.0021376112,0.00019934324,0.00014014478,0.0027696982,0.0012060577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034617337,0.0005281712,0.00081019115,0.0031962304,0.04168894,0.019500835,0.0034481303,0.007084635,0.011788904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013281984,0.00063254096,0.0006671088,0.0061118454,0.013215713,0.0029984044,0.0028476354,0.008410563,0.0006759063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006554994,0.000037346595,0.0043534907,0.00006105046,0.000035277335,0.00047831002,0.020339606,0.0012503467,0.00015268111,0.8562414,0.10090542,0.016079543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007123963,0.000035989182,0.033755746,0.0008741736,0.00025453078,0.0001770041,0.15559153,0.0037742807,0.0008831388,0.19745721,0.60682636,0.0002987026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99714065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21039055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21039055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2641206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.915835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385591222","doi":"10.59962/9780774864985-005","title":"Party Discipline in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.022104964443234364,"score_gpt":0.19174002446403896,"score_spread":0.16963506002080458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385591222","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036266886,0.012962136,0.00038955171,0.039446186,0.0010053021,0.000056923775,0.0007575923,0.00007602641,0.9090394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29919484,0.006336078,0.0005326816,0.0080586355,0.00015390158,0.00004309262,0.00025996802,0.00010446526,0.6853163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99676454,0.0002070951,0.000050725772,0.0003037463,0.0009685367,0.0017053238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99799865,0.00022277287,0.00005563928,0.000069332025,0.0009562241,0.00069740025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011060713,0.00038633106,0.0006020646,0.002639395,0.03087457,0.0112908045,0.0015403301,0.0036065576,0.038082123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00383429,0.0005610211,0.00054596417,0.005362345,0.004776435,0.0018184815,0.002666229,0.0053677773,0.0023527795],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047158006,0.000039100243,0.0031489502,0.00009134715,0.000017352995,0.0002813544,0.0071487515,0.00040637376,0.00019325617,0.71463835,0.22991,0.044077948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016506858,0.000009739354,0.008478919,0.00016251572,0.000017384129,0.000051687177,0.0067242063,0.0002519511,0.00014645027,0.012458249,0.9716483,0.00003398318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.995756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16778204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16778204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27711108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9652549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385591295","doi":"10.59962/9780774864589-009","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.018875445070853997,"score_gpt":0.1831155589760494,"score_spread":0.16424011390519538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385591295","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007991894,0.016882908,0.0003272324,0.066013634,0.001355956,0.000042827625,0.0006047433,0.000046149613,0.9067346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1973645,0.006301002,0.00052950444,0.024160728,0.00043041835,0.000079058314,0.0002415588,0.000113054586,0.7707802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956802,0.0004304442,0.000068947105,0.0005053175,0.0015507885,0.0017643481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974274,0.00046001896,0.000060277027,0.00013736433,0.001341794,0.00057314365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016345746,0.0006675457,0.0008022303,0.0020664316,0.03258825,0.015490174,0.0020641987,0.008742012,0.03310977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007390631,0.0008209942,0.0005149991,0.0032293748,0.0074795787,0.0031664367,0.0024232469,0.009339768,0.0026179699],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025198218,0.000016406146,0.000533691,0.000039360242,0.000010938943,0.00012274162,0.0015438872,0.00022336321,0.00006681733,0.6764553,0.31065968,0.010302638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001636005,0.0000059622316,0.0016543698,0.0002238758,0.000019532541,0.000031324438,0.0024548012,0.00026253585,0.00010792496,0.046691656,0.9484908,0.000040755498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9875679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99466443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10915999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10915999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18371348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7920149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385591994","doi":"10.59962/9780774880541-026","title":"On Obstruction, Denial, and Canada’s Failure to Uphold the Rule of Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Denial; Rule of law; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.012882174686275161,"score_gpt":0.18087735491884382,"score_spread":0.16799518023256865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385591994","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05479345,0.0072587724,0.0010004255,0.12492795,0.00056678586,0.000055466513,0.000371967,0.00006335605,0.8109618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.768834,0.002466535,0.0005599822,0.019943597,0.00018038096,0.000044445624,0.00008778432,0.00009830515,0.20778492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99387145,0.0005861803,0.00008548297,0.00050110405,0.0018541443,0.003101584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953721,0.0014223189,0.00018870078,0.00026794532,0.001814049,0.0009348911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032571165,0.00038984962,0.00061617617,0.0019548016,0.029952854,0.012218251,0.0024326318,0.008450644,0.013055453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011476049,0.00048958755,0.00040660333,0.0034020096,0.02717866,0.0034939772,0.0039502615,0.012154375,0.0008790402],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022648017,0.00001348555,0.001009685,0.000020283187,0.0000072351595,0.00018115918,0.009795021,0.0002182069,0.00008071185,0.9067922,0.07122833,0.010631012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006286077,0.000017628703,0.008750418,0.00030506053,0.000048000333,0.00014689824,0.019494506,0.00068962097,0.00044284677,0.16750844,0.80242217,0.000111418005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99222916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9967816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11412376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11412376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.194665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82802975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385594028","doi":"10.59962/9780774836340-030","title":"26 Early Days on the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.030277000551344142,"score_gpt":0.1938477171451442,"score_spread":0.16357071659380007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385594028","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0078823855,0.02184636,0.0008062676,0.07290514,0.0020295088,0.000048195867,0.00058107043,0.000059426835,0.8938416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23538716,0.007329092,0.0007232687,0.026454087,0.0006615223,0.00006941711,0.00015664901,0.00015825102,0.7290605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99595344,0.0005066442,0.000076146396,0.00047104066,0.0013060352,0.001686793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99727803,0.0008068088,0.000061022052,0.0001231448,0.0013341546,0.00039689653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020837965,0.0007487693,0.0007455858,0.002406107,0.029194381,0.014853368,0.0019550435,0.0099860355,0.027505988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0087606795,0.0007387443,0.00046591935,0.00385894,0.013812468,0.0037113023,0.0021002435,0.010880409,0.0019855457],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001466215,0.000008588122,0.00025724102,0.000027184802,0.000005763093,0.000098684744,0.0025271943,0.00013867322,0.00006393429,0.82408375,0.16536462,0.007409658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015164105,0.0000059198587,0.0016263152,0.00033573183,0.000020855201,0.00003278857,0.003033147,0.00019843403,0.00020342863,0.078229226,0.9162448,0.000054072454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98299176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9935742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.100766145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.100766145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14122173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73111296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385594052","doi":"10.59962/9780774836340-029","title":"25 Appointment to the Supreme Court of Canada, 1987","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02250871694757528,"score_gpt":0.20121282161483145,"score_spread":0.17870410466725617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385594052","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010878345,0.034187954,0.00060033397,0.06720811,0.003280472,0.00016162115,0.002496237,0.000104701045,0.8810822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10603979,0.007052151,0.0006862763,0.029064933,0.00050827686,0.00013486017,0.00041547502,0.00012296067,0.85597533],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99578995,0.00034340087,0.000100491765,0.00035628956,0.001555745,0.0018540783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966719,0.0007051024,0.00007472632,0.00011217686,0.001962565,0.00047348224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022864507,0.00088044896,0.0009418789,0.0035951308,0.041754894,0.014745147,0.002671814,0.012785672,0.027959889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010280128,0.0012818597,0.000671576,0.005688509,0.0070279697,0.0028080842,0.0021408054,0.011395147,0.0032017194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003678698,0.000032134776,0.0007627825,0.00005829821,0.000013411644,0.00023942142,0.002531778,0.00024943668,0.000082634586,0.4409625,0.54458565,0.010445175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023796081,0.000006973381,0.0037569096,0.00032851985,0.000028853901,0.000043996188,0.0026092015,0.00021871913,0.0002140204,0.022187816,0.9705235,0.00005783929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99039185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13450624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13450624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22182132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9759157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385598665","doi":"10.59962/9780774861731-004","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada Takes to the Constitutional Stage","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Stage (stratigraphy); Law; Political science; Geology; Paleontology","score_opus":0.019637432230787528,"score_gpt":0.19409578764796667,"score_spread":0.17445835541717913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385598665","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011655463,0.015646903,0.0012898124,0.11781147,0.0015043024,0.000041135325,0.00083066284,0.00009885597,0.85112137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3363801,0.0072521674,0.0016046686,0.03761394,0.0006281258,0.000062610765,0.00026149018,0.00016804974,0.61602885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99486876,0.000552638,0.00007224106,0.00043644142,0.002171899,0.0018980918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970258,0.00087055715,0.000058295085,0.00013086932,0.0014758662,0.00043876364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025647164,0.0005139153,0.000616442,0.0023249858,0.0237554,0.018049013,0.0021245112,0.008555818,0.016383495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008707749,0.0006687826,0.00041462627,0.003951631,0.013951027,0.003752398,0.0016727877,0.009453483,0.0015359246],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000090809135,0.000007367574,0.00025150887,0.000023843386,0.000004903142,0.000054760636,0.0012748912,0.0001747094,0.000070124006,0.8709033,0.11962838,0.00759712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015862284,0.0000067524343,0.0018532964,0.0001935201,0.000022108414,0.000027821738,0.002881499,0.0003773164,0.0002985728,0.11589503,0.87837744,0.000050747447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9897278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9956707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10288214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10288214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23162188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7464657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385598905","doi":"10.59962/9780774861731-002","title":"Preface","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.023407642503380788,"score_gpt":0.2026470071553356,"score_spread":0.1792393646519548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385598905","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005643846,0.004960379,0.0017428102,0.0074140737,0.019990494,0.00012583676,0.0028559822,0.00049316295,0.9618529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0029918752,0.0026413116,0.00084822194,0.0018252784,0.0034288885,0.000067787216,0.0022263124,0.0003620699,0.9856082],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995036,0.00006432927,0.00002414659,0.0000913303,0.00027367767,0.000042813444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876666,0.00024498533,0.00004961701,0.00013638141,0.00062668475,0.00017555596],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005142669,0.0005986656,0.0004806203,0.0019385759,0.002329577,0.004101569,0.0010305356,0.0009580664,0.41624764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031148929,0.00026764022,0.00034597298,0.0019046691,0.0007606554,0.002729967,0.0015699345,0.0026648906,0.22973001],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010778127,0.000012565638,0.00006234937,0.00007105774,9.2779777e-7,0.000033401167,0.00019655084,0.00004009738,0.00009109657,0.014878809,0.94853735,0.036065187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.4610225e-7,0.0000025868678,0.00008053268,0.000048509068,3.027718e-7,0.000026122625,0.000059867525,0.000009103456,0.000019015075,0.0011872307,0.9985648,0.0000012014116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003978338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006133068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5837524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021971066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015344357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385600200","doi":"10.59962/9780774834506-013","title":"Institutional Change, Permanent Campaigning, and Canada’s Fixed Election Date Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03066153552095733,"score_gpt":0.20980775286813222,"score_spread":0.1791462173471749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385600200","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038261555,0.0058657955,0.0019020227,0.043059997,0.00037037523,0.00005287355,0.00057094725,0.0000800946,0.9098363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70447046,0.0023994697,0.00097192934,0.008354435,0.00015506471,0.000043609478,0.00018413477,0.00008364364,0.2833373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99391913,0.0004583076,0.00010059764,0.0005476949,0.0018525523,0.0031218072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949567,0.0017387212,0.00019703146,0.0003782749,0.0018018911,0.00092741515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003072618,0.0003582361,0.00047919148,0.0020165269,0.01748903,0.01578051,0.0022300314,0.0049404176,0.019024914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01113583,0.0005456205,0.00042119226,0.0030739577,0.0115186935,0.0022511273,0.0020218878,0.008485067,0.00081334723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019017785,0.000013941414,0.0009569694,0.00001941586,0.000006160701,0.000050303595,0.0015215308,0.00034669682,0.000076356635,0.9513139,0.03376612,0.011909535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006855443,0.000028080214,0.020575464,0.0004113976,0.000070798,0.00007514691,0.005281221,0.0017324823,0.0006755036,0.17520027,0.79575,0.00013108816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9898637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9957671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.123381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.123381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17421797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89519596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385721839","doi":"10.59962/9780774816762-002","title":"Should We Cheer? Contested Constitutionalism and the <i>Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Charter; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Democracy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.023574284482760357,"score_gpt":0.19835855168899436,"score_spread":0.174784267206234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385721839","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018868636,0.01495389,0.0022651255,0.2248418,0.0014005363,0.00005928121,0.00041152487,0.00007672641,0.7371225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69454485,0.0067516025,0.002440589,0.034168568,0.0006285646,0.0000903886,0.00014052953,0.00020296827,0.26103196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904507,0.0017468707,0.00014576947,0.0009352064,0.0031724942,0.0035489409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944048,0.001841981,0.00022466558,0.0004078789,0.002178166,0.00094253576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008053748,0.0007058151,0.000864336,0.0022883161,0.03357813,0.02686194,0.0035554506,0.009904771,0.013684586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015072005,0.0008645345,0.0005438334,0.0054580397,0.068138696,0.008298368,0.0035172293,0.017255906,0.00093200133],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045402317,0.0000044579897,0.00009149387,0.0000108412405,0.0000023193745,0.000019999303,0.0032314216,0.00008423732,0.000023633513,0.9669728,0.026932854,0.0026214186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033380897,0.0000060679454,0.0020026516,0.00025736558,0.000022628645,0.00004128179,0.011057766,0.0004386763,0.0001707936,0.4629404,0.5229224,0.00010657181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99089044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99539423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15807635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15807635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27364787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9765121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385736645","doi":"10.59962/9780774818896-015","title":"Use of the Canadian Judicial Institution","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05241980198203445,"score_gpt":0.19611476797619842,"score_spread":0.14369496599416398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385736645","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062379963,0.0074416716,0.00049763866,0.014361677,0.00033214118,0.000022098728,0.00038131507,0.0000507771,0.97067475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.353911,0.010000861,0.0013640327,0.0047172513,0.00017463164,0.000059444275,0.0002354313,0.00011948591,0.6294179],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960679,0.0004919376,0.00008547944,0.0004416731,0.0017545009,0.0011584471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969939,0.00052890106,0.00010171211,0.00020429843,0.001692958,0.0004782171],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019799692,0.0006073062,0.00042987076,0.004890661,0.026312623,0.012664473,0.0017705163,0.00298978,0.027618024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059008,0.0004807202,0.0003536189,0.007072587,0.009817587,0.003221054,0.00229986,0.0040070987,0.0022469596],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013243651,0.000006623104,0.00054194644,0.000041047017,0.0000043735236,0.00007060765,0.004524765,0.00013632089,0.000087266504,0.86025906,0.1055262,0.028788384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003423445,0.000003486624,0.0023529262,0.00012140947,0.000009097324,0.000042024225,0.0022943716,0.00012078779,0.00011768206,0.013147885,0.9817592,0.000027701186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9926171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99720734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14329652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14329652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16351572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9936546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385744360","doi":"10.59962/9780774823524","title":"Governing from the Bench","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.023564436634583023,"score_gpt":0.2005969415269002,"score_spread":0.17703250489231717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385744360","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031827442,0.0033596158,0.0018244003,0.029258035,0.00045252612,0.000047327572,0.00015074675,0.00007161225,0.9330083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6988089,0.0033260102,0.0007567408,0.008183572,0.00021360537,0.00003334019,0.00015047257,0.00009754547,0.28842992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966215,0.000550819,0.00004760755,0.0003503119,0.0011597356,0.0012698901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837804,0.0002815666,0.00006250305,0.0001152416,0.0006749653,0.00048768896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016603424,0.00023824623,0.0002851292,0.0009243988,0.02493687,0.010234469,0.0011440711,0.00214875,0.0127734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044212383,0.00016094632,0.00022874799,0.0012565743,0.021096395,0.0036219917,0.0029767347,0.003933587,0.0013012673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007145165,0.000016756467,0.0010752762,0.00002767637,0.0000036422894,0.00017421084,0.023991792,0.00012462595,0.00023587774,0.8887509,0.060047217,0.025544867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055428145,0.000026128015,0.0059190914,0.00028872147,0.0000111748395,0.00011211287,0.03232197,0.00018478437,0.00033867074,0.06759913,0.89315605,0.00003659999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8427756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8986025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8427756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037741173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08181083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31630063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385747202","doi":"10.59962/9780774816762-006","title":"Legislative Activism and Parliamentary Bills of Rights: Institutional Lessons for Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Law and economics; Public administration; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.02378121751425255,"score_gpt":0.21455182783542756,"score_spread":0.190770610321175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385747202","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07379674,0.007451149,0.0017874368,0.12742618,0.00031295206,0.000107096166,0.00092381984,0.0001319921,0.7880626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7945367,0.0042111687,0.0011908703,0.007643761,0.00016283174,0.000077091936,0.00026624926,0.00012880868,0.19178249],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927739,0.00066426466,0.000121669655,0.00056546665,0.0020635973,0.003811017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897994,0.0035915738,0.0003790807,0.00046582075,0.0037918664,0.0019723396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041923905,0.00044008117,0.0009209776,0.0026630268,0.026242673,0.023286078,0.0035780917,0.0060390495,0.025985258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018052958,0.0008926195,0.00058024627,0.0064605875,0.015555932,0.00490494,0.0034501464,0.0091551775,0.0010198978],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032817345,0.00003443396,0.0014608775,0.000033065837,0.000014736852,0.00007300613,0.0045286766,0.0005590553,0.00009202386,0.9319044,0.04700962,0.014257257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019296442,0.00003410409,0.03399429,0.0005095089,0.00017672962,0.000073667296,0.027198581,0.003966926,0.00075422,0.31809285,0.61479944,0.00020671028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.996283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23696472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23696472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34918457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88501275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385853593","doi":"10.59962/9780774855846-003","title":"1 Models of Judicial Behaviour and the Canadian Supreme Court","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Certiorari; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.029360147251386366,"score_gpt":0.19529045078324753,"score_spread":0.16593030353186117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385853593","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029963877,0.006071322,0.006222891,0.023776677,0.0002174059,0.000044590783,0.0011281963,0.00011225452,0.9324627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8487445,0.0053325472,0.002570529,0.0014363817,0.00014068322,0.000041808005,0.0003330446,0.00007179868,0.14132866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998355,0.00036366875,0.00002299584,0.00016094222,0.0004919321,0.00060551055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973551,0.00084653415,0.00012909278,0.00013546445,0.0011161385,0.00041763886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015021118,0.00080749625,0.00057483796,0.0024455134,0.008928465,0.010189111,0.0023520319,0.003205328,0.02526367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071654813,0.00056091335,0.00048209913,0.006167945,0.0090135345,0.0030669547,0.00086936617,0.0025248842,0.0013854667],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009367756,0.000009881329,0.0007574844,0.000013751483,0.0000037391044,0.000029167802,0.0009333033,0.0025246143,0.000027966367,0.97266555,0.018416345,0.0046087997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032696433,0.000018423958,0.012153124,0.0002499371,0.000037740898,0.00008944187,0.0040751062,0.022257337,0.00008344256,0.7632021,0.19771096,0.00008969128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9837413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9860976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.093680754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.093680754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07489116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67970467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385853641","doi":"10.59962/9780774856188-006","title":"Canada’s Contribution to the Comparative Study of Rights and Judicial Review","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.025690004561096512,"score_gpt":0.23054235144931717,"score_spread":0.20485234688822065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385853641","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019967122,0.0582032,0.0017901429,0.103902616,0.0014312861,0.00007719659,0.0029393837,0.00014314493,0.81154585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60381323,0.04835625,0.006016031,0.018045494,0.00077872496,0.00015832091,0.0010373928,0.00024472887,0.3215498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930206,0.0011517728,0.00015026066,0.0004159333,0.0037063952,0.0015551016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98798496,0.0048980634,0.0003169442,0.00053070224,0.004996519,0.0012727723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031109066,0.00039676085,0.0006356751,0.009959262,0.01499424,0.009793291,0.0017098188,0.0037502525,0.021265974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013195002,0.00054976676,0.0005112908,0.016719544,0.007858298,0.003456052,0.0019328146,0.002795348,0.0009131739],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037740454,0.000030210247,0.0039501972,0.0002699063,0.000031176984,0.00017418103,0.0042007966,0.00044051395,0.0001016777,0.5782289,0.34281394,0.069720775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020216938,0.0000072700086,0.017205257,0.00050006656,0.000041949756,0.000081418875,0.003766933,0.00058859563,0.00017212739,0.03635531,0.94121176,0.000049127557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99514765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99833786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14461963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14461963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27852666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99211997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385855399","doi":"10.59962/9780774817349-001","title":"Preface","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.02162949007285553,"score_gpt":0.2032965924537921,"score_spread":0.18166710238093658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385855399","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00096146896,0.0036208373,0.0013493884,0.01983385,0.042091005,0.0003615323,0.01127475,0.00059941417,0.9199078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003972875,0.0015478972,0.0005400369,0.0036689602,0.002630596,0.00012495002,0.0040867077,0.00027525902,0.9831527],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998838,0.0001350559,0.00006051028,0.00020494548,0.0005714138,0.00019012688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967539,0.0003966448,0.00008609336,0.00025535174,0.0020264103,0.00048152308],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001316971,0.00064305926,0.0005705027,0.0016508602,0.0057137795,0.0040764185,0.0016695965,0.0017178524,0.54127645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067149885,0.00036956076,0.00041238416,0.0018295577,0.000911405,0.00281947,0.0024259998,0.0030505427,0.29154482],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010545794,0.000006129763,0.000066593595,0.00004146049,4.957791e-7,0.000026484682,0.00016572497,0.000011758593,0.0000410308,0.0041832784,0.9835939,0.011852688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011481292,0.0000034273078,0.0001918734,0.000041888045,3.6042005e-7,0.0000140401335,0.00015657129,0.000005996309,0.000019420058,0.0003764036,0.99918693,0.000001969726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051614672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.087454826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45872355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050995885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068045408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385860693","doi":"10.59962/9780774855150-003","title":"Canada’s Courts in Context","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02699150591391886,"score_gpt":0.20626380431073915,"score_spread":0.1792722983968203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385860693","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022884747,0.0124564,0.00062845653,0.059032694,0.0007535066,0.000037901573,0.00073471136,0.00006467147,0.90340686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53823435,0.007867958,0.00093310943,0.012473868,0.00024986442,0.000049593116,0.0002914599,0.00011295993,0.43978688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99657756,0.00037025698,0.00005992671,0.00032223153,0.001254108,0.0014159763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99738103,0.00045415026,0.0000680551,0.000108815344,0.0012240881,0.0007639119],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013474654,0.00044614222,0.0005396776,0.0025629313,0.023649735,0.019644018,0.0020117594,0.0044874963,0.026096644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051861936,0.000666885,0.00036588236,0.0052045565,0.010033553,0.0031947112,0.0023186787,0.006667936,0.001267979],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017142911,0.000015410042,0.0011804949,0.000042910102,0.000011446726,0.00023493487,0.0055209408,0.00033193175,0.00009020994,0.80442953,0.17005111,0.018073928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012504407,0.000006128174,0.005796809,0.00029781152,0.000020267738,0.00006558849,0.008406836,0.00028201792,0.00013063697,0.04397556,0.9409565,0.00004941261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99468696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16263817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16263817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26217303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.971221},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385860923","doi":"10.59962/9780774855150-007","title":"Responsiveness of Judicial Decisions to Canadian Democracy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.04197681545091582,"score_gpt":0.2443179095851862,"score_spread":0.20234109413427037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385860923","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26204944,0.0013706088,0.0005716959,0.030048894,0.00020373231,0.00008295149,0.0008287368,0.00006969698,0.7047742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9622761,0.00045546232,0.000120947276,0.0018472227,0.000049960363,0.00002237479,0.000109272594,0.000026811724,0.035091884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9856802,0.0022775177,0.00018926527,0.000877134,0.005494212,0.005481701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9741616,0.009507709,0.0012514034,0.0008354489,0.0112130325,0.0030307383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072367196,0.00033818104,0.0005896124,0.0036016805,0.015081607,0.008759466,0.0016562563,0.002855873,0.019328931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059254773,0.00039140004,0.0005191586,0.0057229297,0.0073911697,0.0016367626,0.0020830114,0.005215695,0.00086263695],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058293866,0.00013807096,0.029882813,0.00013340234,0.000086454194,0.0005061233,0.028631752,0.0068716905,0.0011062311,0.74603,0.13498026,0.051050168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002403895,0.00014686296,0.32641298,0.0003582316,0.00024295712,0.0001672649,0.05449081,0.009483185,0.0017321039,0.13525386,0.4710526,0.00041879638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98939884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9948067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17404738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17404738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15274924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95798796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385868921","doi":"10.59962/9780774817882-004","title":"Systemism and Canadian Constitutional Politics","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.026377884595376638,"score_gpt":0.18931155054678867,"score_spread":0.16293366595141204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385868921","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017718408,0.021284964,0.00046600972,0.04214804,0.00053779123,0.00002831139,0.0005896424,0.00006886642,0.917158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41300726,0.015204052,0.0011430323,0.0051100827,0.00024208162,0.00005177162,0.00032457896,0.000117420255,0.5647997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99731416,0.00034073638,0.000047939528,0.00022794088,0.0010725617,0.0009965923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979613,0.0005771975,0.000059810005,0.000116801166,0.0009406757,0.00034416525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017560667,0.0005348363,0.0005553296,0.0041041193,0.021665225,0.013936937,0.0014149568,0.0029935506,0.034009527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005433132,0.00063333183,0.00039597304,0.0071598627,0.011169849,0.00281088,0.0018305157,0.005367095,0.0011995381],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020770503,0.000011955991,0.00050139014,0.00005763809,0.000006282556,0.000068274494,0.0036998854,0.0003401509,0.000061011935,0.87317765,0.10402217,0.018032864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001939444,0.0000055199084,0.0053349975,0.00022455557,0.00001805223,0.00003924452,0.004112689,0.00039697374,0.00011792263,0.072192274,0.917494,0.000044297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99510175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99762386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19583093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19583093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17087628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93272215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385869093","doi":"10.59962/9780774817882","title":"Constitutional Politics in Canada after the Charter","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Politics; Political science; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.01701376880649162,"score_gpt":0.18021479397088494,"score_spread":0.16320102516439333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385869093","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00779023,0.05210764,0.0012220552,0.0736569,0.0021880039,0.000056340712,0.00046063593,0.000102731196,0.86241555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30048594,0.03707748,0.0020594464,0.022442618,0.0007475659,0.000088101624,0.00042694682,0.0001540089,0.63651794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973488,0.00024975638,0.000035900543,0.00024343947,0.001348141,0.0007740058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986864,0.00028832204,0.000031696392,0.000060666105,0.00076380296,0.00016916507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013510238,0.00040176127,0.00037013934,0.0017663513,0.017346933,0.00993556,0.000917675,0.0021071224,0.008558327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038799897,0.00025293103,0.000303141,0.004145836,0.013830057,0.0021749807,0.0014499996,0.004721008,0.0008803357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006688424,0.0000049605037,0.00019070192,0.00004054559,0.0000026645237,0.00007291311,0.003170541,0.00019696007,0.00006394308,0.8564876,0.12560283,0.014159713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006484804,0.000003342978,0.0010871137,0.00015560279,0.000006195679,0.000042815303,0.0015595852,0.00013532175,0.0000835225,0.031753,0.9651469,0.000020173007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.988648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99076813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15257807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15257807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18860288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9828893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385869418","doi":"10.59962/9781895830439-014","title":"The Canadian Constitutional Régime","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.019622796745278524,"score_gpt":0.19418352036101033,"score_spread":0.1745607236157318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385869418","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028802815,0.010342837,0.0002793205,0.021551678,0.00058106007,0.000027911054,0.0005517368,0.000048301277,0.96373683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10290153,0.0069336626,0.00074289186,0.0058668745,0.00020716939,0.000059225873,0.0002761738,0.00008971996,0.88292277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99737203,0.00029583042,0.00004286878,0.0002954374,0.0011516074,0.00084213424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99833965,0.0002761611,0.000036241832,0.00012878852,0.0008956541,0.0003234228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013338634,0.00071387057,0.00052007363,0.003390178,0.022310803,0.012346794,0.0014173837,0.003587124,0.059468813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005115132,0.00056853605,0.00042463985,0.0048048524,0.008571822,0.0030109147,0.001968479,0.004315757,0.0041204547],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012552159,0.00001194735,0.00033513358,0.000041713716,0.000003788243,0.000049735743,0.001605187,0.00015636119,0.00004936621,0.71371293,0.26429522,0.019726066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004887542,0.0000026369787,0.001194817,0.0001074176,0.0000053079734,0.000016392487,0.0014159889,0.00009133575,0.00004859978,0.025367089,0.97172934,0.00001620253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99152875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14190575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14190575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15736146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9952677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385869516","doi":"10.59962/9780774817882-003","title":"Constitutional Politics in Canada: The Charter and Beyond","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Politics; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.021381657013867725,"score_gpt":0.18050546032944842,"score_spread":0.15912380331558068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385869516","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034020964,0.056397855,0.0020857311,0.15505777,0.001353901,0.00007138034,0.0012271885,0.00014875934,0.7496366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5991602,0.034676272,0.0021586965,0.017201498,0.000536705,0.00008286873,0.0004138171,0.0002520347,0.3455179],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951851,0.00054110953,0.000072927694,0.0004073137,0.0021227987,0.0016707554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950623,0.0013145203,0.00016067522,0.0001826562,0.0022810295,0.0009986953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002505106,0.00061473233,0.00083706685,0.004165613,0.026214683,0.02481012,0.002353488,0.005156557,0.015590387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009948059,0.000852124,0.00042202062,0.010892455,0.020187438,0.004324544,0.0021519514,0.0074347993,0.0009632936],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017703665,0.00001812035,0.0010145875,0.00007577622,0.000011007645,0.000091261856,0.0047497693,0.0005672166,0.00008345367,0.8271774,0.13782814,0.028365446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023489427,0.000009761092,0.009109764,0.00052686385,0.000032395263,0.00005177113,0.009612864,0.0009934935,0.0002167433,0.10374066,0.8755819,0.00010024034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99747676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25013995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.25013995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.44133297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86973137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385870542","doi":"10.59962/9780774855938-013","title":"Welfare Rights as Equality Rights? Insights from the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Welfare rights; Law; Welfare; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.020452458561009773,"score_gpt":0.19561883273887018,"score_spread":0.1751663741778604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385870542","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03364626,0.022941494,0.00096566236,0.107584566,0.00035115547,0.000035479552,0.0003182507,0.000021970945,0.8341352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8468502,0.013799664,0.00083674653,0.01663806,0.00027277877,0.000048126138,0.00012156902,0.00007415677,0.121358596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947056,0.0007614926,0.000082774575,0.00042925501,0.0016439765,0.0023769224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947601,0.0022527836,0.0001519693,0.00016834051,0.0018897516,0.0007770002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029897955,0.0005323315,0.00102576,0.0029914847,0.035601735,0.022806691,0.0028774012,0.008646621,0.013132216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009282613,0.00067119976,0.00051976566,0.006479251,0.026020588,0.0055027464,0.0030341418,0.01121159,0.00065388443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011208614,0.00000939404,0.00036853045,0.00002342112,0.0000060999423,0.00009306958,0.005345332,0.00027009693,0.000031741947,0.968635,0.020967316,0.0042387913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004776922,0.000008775815,0.0060674087,0.0007339129,0.00007053843,0.000096897435,0.02524241,0.0015309472,0.00018413768,0.55247796,0.4134419,0.00009730452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9947121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1960536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1960536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20139493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9324639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385870847","doi":"10.59962/9780774855938-012","title":"Multiculturalism, Equality, and Canadian Constitutionalism: Cohesion and Difference","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Multiculturalism; Cohesion (chemistry); Political science; Sociology; Law; Physics; Democracy","score_opus":0.03831836513427042,"score_gpt":0.21522681353971587,"score_spread":0.17690844840544545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385870847","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03781667,0.032237228,0.0009172771,0.05687159,0.00048474444,0.00002561492,0.00022369478,0.00004683981,0.8713764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.853251,0.011375816,0.0010401882,0.003871404,0.0002462487,0.000028075681,0.00012776261,0.00006087496,0.1299986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968258,0.0004811279,0.000054729524,0.0002572862,0.0012780966,0.0011028851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975343,0.000965975,0.00009179448,0.00015177787,0.0008019667,0.00045416807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023671687,0.0003780527,0.00048126627,0.002693813,0.019840803,0.01350804,0.0015134634,0.0022438276,0.011923507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052711335,0.00032240272,0.00022973835,0.006161057,0.027174111,0.003141105,0.0023651978,0.004365148,0.00032707656],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011051546,0.000010450767,0.00058643095,0.000034588607,0.0000041502385,0.000042609478,0.012558803,0.000115038456,0.000055541444,0.9440624,0.021803519,0.020715412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020076237,0.000011283293,0.017433159,0.0004750122,0.000029005889,0.000085937914,0.036004122,0.00031804477,0.00025640766,0.26334956,0.6819575,0.000059927774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9774408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9917386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0837336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0837336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13499169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6075326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386095840","doi":"10.1017/s000842392300046x","title":"Who Intervenes in Supreme Court Cases in Canada?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Brock University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Charter; Politics; Constitution; Equity (law); Intervention (counseling); Psychology","score_opus":0.0526511807709244,"score_gpt":0.3191753920487523,"score_spread":0.2665242112778279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386095840","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8729912,0.004162351,0.0005498573,0.03491666,0.000203619,0.00018595748,0.0006658098,0.00004397833,0.086280644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992485,0.00067543593,0.00012512344,0.0021493998,0.000033153272,0.000022017924,0.00012657107,0.000010250424,0.0043731537],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97805333,0.0022887448,0.00046139132,0.0016019922,0.0054082377,0.012186268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9636695,0.010729113,0.0048171864,0.00065988436,0.009536346,0.0105879055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008545377,0.00030618324,0.0006533537,0.005684899,0.030488739,0.011803033,0.0034397955,0.0048357234,0.006064393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03622034,0.0007721691,0.00039452314,0.007952144,0.010965994,0.0024481602,0.0044675,0.006039041,0.00037372223],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005632347,0.00061109336,0.45534453,0.00043440136,0.00018325959,0.007700635,0.19066936,0.001674772,0.0020651878,0.17695738,0.084419474,0.07937677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000109743036,0.00012018194,0.52928877,0.00094820966,0.0001941022,0.0008403645,0.29460478,0.0030752625,0.0015380721,0.011526892,0.15738173,0.00037197268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99518836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99847335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.209878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.209878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25483128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9164295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386183732","doi":"10.59962/9780774851787-010","title":"The New Constitutionalism and the Polarizing Performance of the Canadian Conversation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Conversation; Political science; Psychology; Communication; Law; Democracy","score_opus":0.021159105114249566,"score_gpt":0.1938852228696552,"score_spread":0.17272611775540564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386183732","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021510668,0.0057475413,0.0010410168,0.054012496,0.0004522225,0.000021359318,0.00013839922,0.00004385524,0.9170324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8340133,0.0032034274,0.00094843394,0.006829157,0.00027998592,0.00003120976,0.00006121296,0.000119418335,0.15451394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992163,0.0017053443,0.000083889165,0.00065979816,0.0027592834,0.0026288144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946424,0.0019215841,0.00014526397,0.0003417454,0.0021566497,0.0007924101],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005337251,0.000503618,0.0006199595,0.0028935322,0.0363094,0.02179041,0.0020690677,0.0043109143,0.016826192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012434414,0.00044441258,0.00030712583,0.0042949747,0.046446413,0.0048421826,0.0035929794,0.007120559,0.0010659711],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001755604,0.000004544118,0.00020888985,0.000018966302,0.0000029895448,0.000049466955,0.015671542,0.0000909532,0.00009331883,0.9558725,0.021312708,0.006656615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028455412,0.000008528291,0.004070584,0.00025073023,0.000023986939,0.00007550421,0.03674363,0.0004507958,0.00036754378,0.24472275,0.71317774,0.000079837526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9854403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9923078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15877877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15877877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14994784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9756974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386308524","doi":"10.1093/he/9780191995729.003.0064","title":"Re Resolution to Amend the Constitution of Canada [1981] 1 SCR 753 Supreme Court of Canada (also known as the Patriation Reference)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04284695964877525,"score_gpt":0.23096518949220327,"score_spread":0.18811822984342802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386308524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003370507,0.00858236,0.00072947994,0.03965314,0.0029172518,0.00017821217,0.0011168761,0.00007244463,0.9433797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08500403,0.0065367636,0.0020833658,0.04322073,0.00088038505,0.00018069956,0.0007397399,0.00012659839,0.86122763],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929207,0.00056811393,0.00020237388,0.00050500024,0.003989618,0.0018141656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977133,0.00045053498,0.0000961116,0.0001320387,0.0014236426,0.00018430731],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028640493,0.0007343317,0.000512862,0.0022059062,0.014715499,0.006720525,0.0024852054,0.010703887,0.012687812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075900494,0.0006308865,0.0006801604,0.0031902622,0.0075338627,0.0016541288,0.0018111228,0.0076543624,0.0026525005],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008591498,0.000013204981,0.00021725112,0.000039604045,0.0000053745357,0.00020372898,0.0017097001,0.00024047645,0.00017483042,0.45724678,0.5329867,0.0071538556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013702036,0.000005734105,0.0013525799,0.00020991785,0.000010957668,0.000060022885,0.0010507907,0.00013787943,0.00021499,0.0120831,0.98482287,0.000037480135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96906304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9850794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08281829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08281829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12428319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6008916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386309250","doi":"10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i04.5904","title":"Judicial Independence and Reformation of the Collegium System: Evaluating the Njac Judgement and Foreign Judicial Appointment Systems","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Judicial independence; Dissenting opinion; Law; Political science; Democracy; Doctrine; Independence (probability theory); Supreme court; Commission; Economic Justice; Politics","score_opus":0.1946743660169466,"score_gpt":0.48570318426204445,"score_spread":0.29102881824509785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386309250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49505085,0.0029148778,0.00312174,0.019013662,0.00063063554,0.00030497607,0.00008623157,0.000021009178,0.4788561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932694,0.00027403238,0.0005659464,0.0011107683,0.00010503347,0.00002391287,0.000015580403,0.000006091042,0.0046292385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9615577,0.017317982,0.0015535929,0.0022815156,0.0106770005,0.0066121495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9625307,0.018497504,0.0043500653,0.0025360787,0.008795304,0.0032903694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03249004,0.00023541128,0.0006131767,0.00334558,0.01207264,0.016919332,0.0017458784,0.0028225495,0.0031741231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059668187,0.00023079393,0.0005756102,0.0039560967,0.020565415,0.0041631,0.005685899,0.0078699095,0.0003641425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011849654,0.00006017272,0.0073553943,0.00007280037,0.000021410806,0.00029150606,0.012891213,0.00065940805,0.00022922593,0.9633473,0.002224486,0.012728608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004298561,0.0015141538,0.16841632,0.0018158107,0.00051124766,0.000921044,0.18036266,0.007249475,0.0044396776,0.3046928,0.32912624,0.0005207314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04317051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08781758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04317051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023293551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021871166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17182583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386313392","doi":"10.1515/9780888647221-009","title":"8 Even When We’re Winning, Are We Losing? Métis Rights in Canadian Courts","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Alberta Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.030768758217116103,"score_gpt":0.2216634698582044,"score_spread":0.1908947116410883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386313392","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018429426,0.007212576,0.00093894365,0.05987915,0.00054621056,0.000035832894,0.00025780156,0.00003497066,0.9126651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5221345,0.004295628,0.0011961547,0.010987549,0.00022510636,0.00004414244,0.00011206365,0.00007145564,0.46093345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99389124,0.0007208424,0.000083237035,0.00038543256,0.0020278266,0.0028914448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972818,0.00061417394,0.00007762364,0.000093612965,0.0014261993,0.0005066208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028570406,0.0004437566,0.0004311072,0.0019745633,0.029152183,0.018339345,0.0018322547,0.0058750864,0.020553948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069755474,0.00039083706,0.00035932107,0.0035103706,0.015132383,0.0037723533,0.0023974287,0.0066431235,0.0011676773],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007361906,0.0000073065107,0.00046492825,0.000021294098,0.0000028176792,0.0000777994,0.00769615,0.000084785024,0.00006054021,0.9196503,0.06129772,0.010628848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013691246,0.000010766098,0.005099678,0.00039792078,0.000023247341,0.00009769163,0.023898631,0.0003769145,0.00022015424,0.112990506,0.8568063,0.000064525906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9893546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99659085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12662892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12662892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18075334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91876143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386314887","doi":"10.1017/s1537592723001767","title":"Contending Orders: Legal Pluralism and the Rule of Law. By Geoffrey Swenson. New York: Oxford University Press, 2022. 288p. $74.00 cloth.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Law; Pluralism (philosophy); Political science; Philosophy; Mathematics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03284308120416296,"score_gpt":0.27990432705217866,"score_spread":0.2470612458480157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386314887","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016468329,0.7466102,0.0024199835,0.14880283,0.00261658,0.00001527819,0.0001380939,0.00004340807,0.097706646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2577347,0.5618329,0.0051898444,0.01585528,0.009907183,0.00013693763,0.00029317572,0.00017856064,0.14887138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980111,0.0010329245,0.00010282604,0.00020728885,0.00048411274,0.00016171193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99660707,0.0023273893,0.00033907875,0.00017070815,0.00033927365,0.0002165158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032269307,0.0010830794,0.00071770104,0.002234489,0.002850781,0.006553658,0.001431721,0.004244508,0.011106731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068106432,0.00090897887,0.00047577044,0.0030199212,0.019493375,0.008904349,0.0020461718,0.004204697,0.0025094324],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002859589,0.000030016865,0.00022438484,0.00033630873,0.000015031687,0.00013280284,0.0038671002,0.00046206373,0.0001455937,0.6464288,0.3027733,0.045555945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018144056,0.000010024466,0.00086341886,0.000983106,0.000007945342,0.00012407977,0.0018168878,0.00031667206,0.00007119209,0.62586707,0.36990637,0.000015049453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016498353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027440827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016498353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005882926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049293987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04268378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386515256","doi":"10.1515/9781772125351-018","title":"Fourteen Premiere Peter Lougheed, Alberta and the Transformation of Constitutionalism in Canada, 1971–1985","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Alberta Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Transformation (genetics); History; Political science; Art history; Law; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.019879701424450752,"score_gpt":0.20233017235509007,"score_spread":0.18245047093063932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386515256","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009514579,0.32866022,0.0010613876,0.33492154,0.026171502,0.00012312621,0.00140611,0.00014951984,0.29799214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07960525,0.062318426,0.00092306983,0.052916758,0.0039587943,0.000066384695,0.00025312218,0.000133778,0.7998244],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986928,0.00017551924,0.000035910067,0.00022272319,0.0005210302,0.000352082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981329,0.0005189563,0.000058686484,0.00005289761,0.0009431133,0.00029350407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016217707,0.00067637634,0.00050508906,0.002187961,0.014261601,0.006920725,0.0015366817,0.0045112614,0.01455737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004635448,0.0007287359,0.0003871023,0.0030208589,0.0062009394,0.0029723465,0.0014528373,0.0063640773,0.0017546746],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003940444,0.0000229031,0.0007007616,0.0000920472,0.0000059849176,0.00012618345,0.0032420245,0.00013765863,0.000063484986,0.12398805,0.8543476,0.017233832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009160908,0.0000033498616,0.0014619069,0.00022121289,0.0000065749937,0.000026181255,0.0018464926,0.000045571087,0.000071857314,0.0050440095,0.9912445,0.000019134059],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96942174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9920481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.064600885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.064600885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07055834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46871442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386652022","doi":"10.4324/9781003252788-6","title":"The Brazilian legal system","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.022565549498909897,"score_gpt":0.2609830848130064,"score_spread":0.2384175353140965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386652022","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063887225,0.008674789,0.0024400707,0.010569628,0.00036569816,0.000041378116,0.00019652524,0.00003397237,0.97128916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6125659,0.019907735,0.008876593,0.011146086,0.00058170245,0.0002558411,0.00061408855,0.00012293819,0.34592918],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980982,0.00057354855,0.0000754432,0.000326222,0.00064435473,0.00028225218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991825,0.0002605731,0.000060349186,0.000094308736,0.000337701,0.00006449736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020056407,0.00041421817,0.00031562854,0.001321996,0.004941496,0.0046790657,0.00061129715,0.0015252415,0.00903195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033413775,0.00020866253,0.00025984904,0.0019244876,0.0060930904,0.0022142406,0.0014373966,0.0018744065,0.0010910144],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.4511773e-7,0.00000232805,0.00007921011,0.00002072692,8.5635355e-7,0.000022998996,0.0012707135,0.000042736967,0.000081161554,0.9844669,0.007705562,0.006305937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003003561,0.0000067513965,0.0010806887,0.00023747004,0.000005874941,0.00008102521,0.00095853984,0.0002621107,0.00008870942,0.103067,0.8942004,0.00000852573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15391742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14781345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15391742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01214777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011458671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3060431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386711153","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.2023.06.12","title":"Grounds-Based Distinctions: Contested Starting Points in Equality Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Doctrine; Law; Charter; Legislature; Political science; Meaning (existential); Common law; Sociology; Law and economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.06390549496755529,"score_gpt":0.3022023849584156,"score_spread":0.23829688999086032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386711153","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047834318,0.0166829,0.1693716,0.27725232,0.0028960726,0.0003199181,0.00026542498,0.0002242048,0.48515317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88486415,0.004367276,0.056278266,0.029281978,0.0014855848,0.00047305372,0.00014128332,0.000241887,0.022866562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.975042,0.009508545,0.0011438101,0.002594438,0.0087218,0.0029892572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98374087,0.010990256,0.00064987224,0.0010800615,0.0024786976,0.0010603138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032478772,0.0008147443,0.0015835274,0.004248293,0.019543542,0.02716592,0.006388545,0.013078298,0.0044837105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030002981,0.0010183351,0.0013656119,0.0030185862,0.1140501,0.025642814,0.012904568,0.02783165,0.0008173613],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016315576,0.0000017798673,0.000025598663,0.0000034808418,6.142996e-7,0.000013501337,0.0007004496,0.00003993906,0.000013311719,0.9980184,0.00031735285,0.00086394424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008162153,0.0000057016073,0.00009901079,0.00006552257,0.0000025329746,0.000011868866,0.00097583904,0.00025171295,0.00006201458,0.98658293,0.0119219525,0.000012799446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22760935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24940674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77239066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0430794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0366189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.452569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386714498","doi":"10.1111/capa.12540","title":"Navigating entangled terrain: The Supreme Court's impact and the dismissal powers of human rights tribunals","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Tribunal; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Human rights; Jurisprudence; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.03343759305254735,"score_gpt":0.3388929615062805,"score_spread":0.30545536845373317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386714498","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9145794,0.0005940198,0.00042451746,0.004253006,0.000029412911,0.0000328686,0.0001544182,0.0000068209547,0.079925604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983841,0.000087964676,0.000044237535,0.00014554383,0.000007930732,0.00000437785,0.000023350547,0.0000030129092,0.0012994299],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892953,0.0021380058,0.0002484295,0.00063749,0.0049715056,0.0027092034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9597683,0.020543177,0.0065589314,0.0016749767,0.008926052,0.0025284844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008852822,0.000095963216,0.0004555412,0.002502463,0.008523549,0.007225221,0.0016398014,0.0013363124,0.004845253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049071256,0.00022536198,0.00022127647,0.0029191498,0.015976174,0.0026740765,0.0030750262,0.0033138792,0.0002907446],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032928062,0.0003587715,0.4834505,0.0001421463,0.00014100742,0.0021310246,0.16447952,0.004489396,0.0019408122,0.23056263,0.01711362,0.0948613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039307964,0.00015245787,0.78878385,0.00037577256,0.00006206001,0.00014664192,0.13038762,0.0022180765,0.00082615635,0.028537631,0.048328273,0.00014214026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7835183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90752906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97139645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028603557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03127731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43551314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386969811","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12664","title":"Discursive mismatch and globalization by stealth: The fight against corruption in the Brazilian legal field","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Danmarks Grundforskningsfond; National Research Foundation; University of Toronto; Styrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete","keywords":"Globalization; Language change; Political science; Criminal law; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Law; Political economy; Law and economics","score_opus":0.023516375793032902,"score_gpt":0.32934933382937054,"score_spread":0.30583295803633764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386969811","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45849043,0.045619998,0.0070359367,0.06819287,0.00031257665,0.00010002819,0.0000413051,0.000024230636,0.4201826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945438,0.0029905576,0.00031499914,0.0007835915,0.00005460871,0.000013402147,0.0000045469496,0.000004981314,0.0012895039],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99274457,0.0051538358,0.00017170826,0.00040868387,0.0011260188,0.00039516954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884808,0.0073269648,0.0016064919,0.0007336603,0.0013762864,0.000475809],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010127806,0.00020194335,0.00041171245,0.003478849,0.004767121,0.0069521456,0.000635849,0.001370082,0.0021032658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013860735,0.00016830095,0.00022139633,0.0027713662,0.024368938,0.0045081703,0.004311782,0.0016368577,0.00010312278],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014861921,0.000025089024,0.005317903,0.00029535394,0.000014908611,0.00026960822,0.10976921,0.00017006249,0.0005325003,0.8573761,0.0019884016,0.024226047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004362368,0.000103168604,0.0391174,0.004449176,0.00009295599,0.0005994488,0.22197029,0.0010963927,0.00096046866,0.38040224,0.35112172,0.00004317758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015172637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024735488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9952329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063148313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007252392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053561628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386996164","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102676","title":"Weaponizing post-election court challenges: Assessing losers’ motivations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Negotiation; Legitimacy; Democracy; Politics; Government (linguistics); Petitioner; General election; Kenya; Vulnerability (computing); Public administration; Political economy; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Supreme court; Computer security","score_opus":0.17648507481869863,"score_gpt":0.3995127728387146,"score_spread":0.22302769802001599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386996164","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97370267,0.00011130492,0.0003823749,0.001648329,0.000032398744,0.000056704044,0.000041219562,0.000004232972,0.024020813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99720275,0.000048622114,0.00012518892,0.00017027656,0.000017458897,0.00002330642,0.000032233453,0.00000507646,0.002375086],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99562234,0.0017045924,0.0001773873,0.00025063186,0.0010267129,0.0012182312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9778813,0.0090200715,0.0061852373,0.0007534033,0.0021811137,0.0039789714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006742565,0.00023255708,0.00041151882,0.0027005444,0.003840044,0.005650288,0.0009940236,0.001831232,0.0073355976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034387257,0.00025609188,0.00021291456,0.0011337154,0.0024362656,0.0024512818,0.0035705685,0.0026673211,0.0005825237],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046986557,0.0009967182,0.83760256,0.00012946862,0.00011455799,0.0006704293,0.06286535,0.00047507268,0.0010296119,0.04616322,0.006804508,0.04267863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047850048,0.00035278022,0.62814516,0.00017857994,0.00006650916,0.0004645958,0.32123652,0.0022358317,0.0006904375,0.016408423,0.030103412,0.00006983593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034403382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010347193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073355976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010650032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002017095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03565854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387081316","doi":"10.21991/cf29458","title":"Is Canadian Constitutional Law Canadian?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Law; International law; Constitutional law; Political science; Comparative law; Municipal law; Public law; Warrant; Common law; Economics","score_opus":0.03660565353978708,"score_gpt":0.28707364655266465,"score_spread":0.2504679930128776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387081316","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019920839,0.027443627,0.001141348,0.44449764,0.0039343024,0.000052749252,0.0012096236,0.00009313518,0.5017066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6773084,0.029696776,0.002391304,0.11838915,0.001617379,0.00007875502,0.0010829555,0.00016573422,0.16926953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921618,0.000539898,0.0001431379,0.0013135441,0.003376085,0.0024655757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99188644,0.0016279666,0.00026479678,0.0003172668,0.004550481,0.0013530927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038302084,0.0003505029,0.000609113,0.0035591573,0.032579094,0.016879022,0.0019942247,0.004493473,0.018967364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014389441,0.0003845706,0.00050572713,0.0068623773,0.023494473,0.0052652285,0.0028391895,0.0057730465,0.0011454517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019682911,0.000007698227,0.0019049742,0.00008619989,0.000009847431,0.00015368727,0.005447147,0.00007628561,0.000079957754,0.81398296,0.1587917,0.019439874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012214107,0.0000051840248,0.0049082,0.00025210765,0.000016730231,0.000103903905,0.009661621,0.00010612858,0.00010540577,0.03843625,0.9463376,0.00005466732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9884809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9917361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86213756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13786244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17729992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387134573","doi":"10.59962/9780774869102","title":"A Culture of Justification","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028964472148682,"score_gpt":0.22329336954437748,"score_spread":0.19432889739569548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387134573","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0503176,0.005653018,0.0066365195,0.07821155,0.00072790164,0.00004808822,0.000081507234,0.00010713863,0.8582167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9489351,0.0015683146,0.0017103902,0.0053632343,0.00010271084,0.00004719216,0.000038968952,0.0000771873,0.042156912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906979,0.0038929926,0.00015140604,0.00069169997,0.0030653658,0.0015005749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99558973,0.0013467693,0.00030861123,0.0005065703,0.0014983396,0.00074998365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046327054,0.00040564706,0.00043420336,0.0017909671,0.022447886,0.018146025,0.0013407251,0.0032097215,0.0030419652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00737135,0.00027432333,0.00020378883,0.0019730653,0.07680273,0.0074694194,0.0053994404,0.0074982145,0.00053046254],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035713342,0.000006011258,0.0003113824,0.000011843854,0.0000018908353,0.000048268408,0.051381838,0.000044380766,0.00008160616,0.9323718,0.01016357,0.0055738655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008619633,0.0000123546515,0.0014870747,0.00021098758,0.0000057105735,0.000121215104,0.059535485,0.00030983487,0.00019263382,0.19960357,0.7384752,0.000037320024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41701174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43802258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41701174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03951548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043252937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8291689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387143841","doi":"10.59962/9780774868853-008","title":"An Emerging Constitutional Culture in Canada’s Postwar Moment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Moment (physics); Political science; Physics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.024289263246643024,"score_gpt":0.2158094162594221,"score_spread":0.19152015301277908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387143841","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21482585,0.0066442797,0.000957653,0.14412214,0.00083695306,0.000047308327,0.0004098031,0.00007534802,0.6320807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88834864,0.0016670781,0.00037443297,0.009953729,0.00012078485,0.0000240021,0.000070250026,0.000091791575,0.09934923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99518096,0.00061790325,0.000064016254,0.00035240775,0.0013169332,0.002467696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943686,0.0013612595,0.00017255449,0.00017879762,0.0021820557,0.0017366447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029935662,0.00035867834,0.00050766364,0.0025068116,0.060746487,0.03236255,0.0023497383,0.005536577,0.013841058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075697363,0.00047214684,0.00028528963,0.0053346744,0.035655245,0.0042894827,0.004080296,0.012099576,0.00066969317],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030478466,0.000025594705,0.001537053,0.000027780909,0.0000066708844,0.00036858942,0.09712571,0.00019460965,0.00025385077,0.8341976,0.054066278,0.012165935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015668427,0.000010957317,0.009503314,0.000199446,0.000012726247,0.000107797416,0.16063432,0.0002657615,0.00034344898,0.033078052,0.795745,0.00008347498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99188316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99708456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24012892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24012892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24949326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88134277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387349674","doi":"10.7202/1106113ar","title":"Une jurisprudence à la fois consultative et constituante — La redéfinition des règles du jeu constitutionnel entre le Québec et le Canada par les renvois de la Cour suprême","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Jurisprudence; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.013309707735884167,"score_gpt":0.2540394026017987,"score_spread":0.24072969486591453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387349674","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09347661,0.016961545,0.017392613,0.11756448,0.0015835798,0.0001648857,0.00053092244,0.0001155454,0.75220984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8361996,0.0047118827,0.004819582,0.011841171,0.00034622537,0.00007509681,0.00015652683,0.000075030024,0.14177504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934458,0.001682461,0.00013895475,0.0009248485,0.002317459,0.001490378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99474585,0.0016877478,0.00027882823,0.00043059303,0.0020576776,0.00079942035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041291574,0.0004147089,0.0005644877,0.0014136867,0.01896142,0.014457355,0.001789051,0.0041251457,0.009556944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068504605,0.00034964786,0.00047330538,0.002206556,0.02236891,0.0041333498,0.0041549234,0.00714472,0.00057788985],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016196464,0.0000109598395,0.0013606463,0.000058617796,0.000011664831,0.00015698909,0.012874143,0.00017935626,0.0004740072,0.963573,0.01151394,0.009770434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002463593,0.000039201313,0.012619355,0.000588068,0.0000525056,0.00027460378,0.028448028,0.00088998274,0.0015284863,0.12527514,0.83014846,0.00011147006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8691674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9318153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9347197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06528034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10815459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47364426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387558292","doi":"10.1017/9781108680929.016","title":"Underuse of the Override","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Political science; Legislature; Law and economics; Politics; Charter; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Constitution; Democracy; Narrative; Power (physics); Normative; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05325531821910654,"score_gpt":0.23456291965180243,"score_spread":0.1813076014326959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387558292","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0164839,0.007560397,0.014858157,0.016085004,0.00085849053,0.00003927003,0.000031908934,0.00007212196,0.94401073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7609572,0.006160409,0.004572475,0.014623103,0.0014924121,0.00022159638,0.00006875119,0.00033968923,0.21156429],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98384166,0.006657468,0.0005003454,0.0022405223,0.0057267947,0.0010331515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99322116,0.0040784124,0.00041930415,0.0012170121,0.00088070444,0.0001834687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076318528,0.00037214087,0.00074804405,0.0015738185,0.0055227554,0.007644893,0.0012129425,0.0024130784,0.005228601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013275874,0.0005333874,0.0004675459,0.0012715238,0.02338982,0.009271429,0.0062948004,0.008385218,0.0015273388],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030920733,0.0000027013457,0.000066023174,0.000015626238,0.0000014192556,0.000019098981,0.0027981391,0.000045849032,0.00006601252,0.9893,0.0028490324,0.0048330426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010268352,0.000041101586,0.0005865285,0.00041436258,0.000013948082,0.00024734696,0.003261064,0.00038047464,0.0009361339,0.4534633,0.5406161,0.00002937381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005431184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00824701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007644893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005750312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056767645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041721642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387667245","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0063","title":"The Independence of the Judiciary and Some of Its Enemies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Judicial independence; Democracy; Economic Justice; Law; Government (linguistics); Political science; Supreme court; Miller; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.015509600138397353,"score_gpt":0.23616337561439815,"score_spread":0.2206537754760008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387667245","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022187274,0.01725171,0.0029645497,0.8546523,0.0011575938,0.000008756136,0.000044946206,0.000022761973,0.101710185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88359416,0.008991141,0.0014324383,0.08057543,0.003570788,0.000037834565,0.000034265446,0.000054475488,0.02170947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98886824,0.0044773933,0.00040638755,0.0009410821,0.002591079,0.0027158158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9793382,0.012587807,0.0014860703,0.0015585471,0.0022281471,0.0028012653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014710495,0.00039284967,0.0007609069,0.0012011577,0.01341049,0.0153396875,0.0018396641,0.009612316,0.0043133013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019528471,0.00073282485,0.0005418104,0.0013701969,0.055761576,0.011960291,0.0063055176,0.025070328,0.0010112046],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047873105,0.000020326655,0.0007715265,0.00005939081,0.000010444413,0.00015921067,0.009831031,0.000107084896,0.00014551355,0.9445219,0.032282945,0.012042693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044490873,0.00005021094,0.0084067695,0.00055846386,0.0000174109,0.00026692182,0.013069615,0.00044333423,0.00046089312,0.59916437,0.3774094,0.000108107626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06232663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.073227555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06232663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015716316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011277175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12392771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387667275","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0069","title":"The Administration of Justice: Justice Rosalie Abella’s Contribution to Canadian Administrative Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Energy","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Jurisprudence; Administrative law; Economic Justice; Legislation; Sociology; Principle of legality; Administration of justice","score_opus":0.029819710840239086,"score_gpt":0.3002272643422826,"score_spread":0.2704075535020435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387667275","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014564182,0.02334064,0.001346112,0.8120496,0.005254919,0.000054342087,0.000107610875,0.000077370736,0.14320527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5932703,0.02408558,0.004026932,0.23520455,0.002523508,0.00008197058,0.000087018896,0.00021348959,0.14050658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98973405,0.001875256,0.00016014824,0.0009290337,0.004170814,0.0031307663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99153495,0.0023786125,0.00019560568,0.00025837537,0.003025969,0.0026065318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006502193,0.00045638942,0.0006208671,0.0022626724,0.05559039,0.012477538,0.0028053937,0.0069899536,0.0037762602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0138323,0.0005667671,0.00045706925,0.0027731103,0.028425075,0.0037891062,0.003754051,0.012668003,0.0004958055],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019072371,0.000035564495,0.0013360116,0.00006961576,0.000014300275,0.00035772895,0.033734802,0.00022741563,0.00021207174,0.50873834,0.4343625,0.020892559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009423203,0.0000074398013,0.0028601238,0.00014097495,0.00001305346,0.00012886807,0.013577233,0.00021948472,0.00014792108,0.025899865,0.9569158,0.00007972213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99164236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18235059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18235059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26203907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9483574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387823569","doi":"10.1093/ajlh/njad025","title":"International Legacies of a Century and a Half of the Case Method","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Legal History","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Geopolitics; Constitution; Politics; Narrative; Period (music); Colonialism; Law; Political science; Sociology; Political economy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.02289333755620614,"score_gpt":0.30692028328914,"score_spread":0.28402694573293386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387823569","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014411828,0.011535766,0.008026843,0.09595085,0.0028603822,0.000055302666,0.000039795348,0.00005967806,0.8670596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8267327,0.009458534,0.00775528,0.027616074,0.0025459947,0.00025731247,0.000099271405,0.00022668042,0.12530817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97824156,0.0145538775,0.00057657954,0.001899941,0.0028553132,0.0018728146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9834809,0.010069013,0.00072805275,0.0023620946,0.0016840268,0.0016758897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022459943,0.00045731894,0.00030459996,0.0022762897,0.014411064,0.022503031,0.0012498285,0.0049311714,0.010101013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022115165,0.00032012243,0.00038163937,0.0023517052,0.046749376,0.012732426,0.008295139,0.0115047,0.00090514024],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028688928,0.000008518329,0.00010403908,0.000008095854,0.000001006861,0.000048132806,0.0045319493,0.000021246133,0.000012340962,0.9808575,0.008618893,0.005785381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063052194,0.000015807645,0.00029127288,0.00037883667,0.0000042177867,0.00016035073,0.011245321,0.0001548605,0.00013686817,0.15701318,0.83057845,0.000014458595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010594484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012549576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022503031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016238125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010435574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11878091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387895001","doi":"10.1017/s1744552323000253","title":"The immigrant versus the state: The marginal contribution of tribunal judges to administrative justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Appeal; Immigration; Bureaucracy; Political science; Economic Justice; Law; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.06347462636925948,"score_gpt":0.38988330320280884,"score_spread":0.32640867683354935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387895001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92153573,0.00076234626,0.0010848199,0.012973346,0.00009557264,0.000033583852,0.00003338405,0.000008128432,0.063473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989009,0.000052307638,0.000058044625,0.00043779716,0.000025018713,0.0000053652943,0.000003531141,0.0000020836615,0.0005150494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9785567,0.012306843,0.00061779766,0.0013050009,0.0035177947,0.0036958577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90573955,0.06248882,0.008815945,0.0036360885,0.01245241,0.006867259],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021979876,0.00009160967,0.00038111547,0.0016263431,0.009331984,0.008800684,0.0014177583,0.0016505978,0.0048153135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10252936,0.00020799293,0.00021897034,0.0015265566,0.013585907,0.0028959834,0.004055374,0.003299031,0.00027671162],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025497525,0.0003338805,0.2636922,0.00019352467,0.000105970386,0.0028540425,0.24110444,0.0008605567,0.0016457912,0.39823923,0.013865053,0.07685047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081735845,0.00035780884,0.4944079,0.0008294983,0.00014766514,0.0011535437,0.34149548,0.0028348134,0.001310439,0.086571604,0.07065538,0.00015415119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.066106625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21424446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.066106625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071106823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010394463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13144368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387911625","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0023","title":"Interpreting Dicey","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Energy","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Law; Context (archaeology); Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional law; Constitutional theory; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Political science; Law and economics; History; Democracy; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.017460022971329724,"score_gpt":0.256647569993155,"score_spread":0.2391875470218253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387911625","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010637784,0.01816537,0.006484596,0.15251903,0.008197837,0.000050333074,0.0004936395,0.00015433268,0.80329704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44372413,0.013182631,0.008023093,0.088190004,0.0059271157,0.00024200382,0.0005835689,0.00043772193,0.4396898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99641645,0.0012102192,0.0001379182,0.0007128248,0.0009643217,0.00055831793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973031,0.0016019949,0.00015713362,0.0002229967,0.0005531795,0.00016152833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032721346,0.00042041246,0.0005140665,0.0019640576,0.007651173,0.008752219,0.0012321391,0.004079529,0.010361886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012217532,0.00039298847,0.00026290948,0.0022587324,0.009710517,0.005772428,0.0035175104,0.0042155623,0.0016764652],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011120744,0.0000033974818,0.00017399684,0.000049781902,0.0000025563077,0.0001321603,0.007237935,0.00006199229,0.00004371434,0.78016406,0.2040265,0.008092763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023598432,0.0000033376095,0.00011829576,0.000096797274,0.0000017858583,0.00007149775,0.0017956012,0.000061181985,0.00009325145,0.031348817,0.9663993,0.0000077724035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021838648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036117055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021838648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0100162085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004505355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07267296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388004980","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2023.a910490","title":"Trust, Legal Elites, and the European Court of Human Rights","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"Danmarks Grundforskningsfond; National Research Foundation; University of Minnesota","keywords":"Political science; Human rights; Law","score_opus":0.023158624710522893,"score_gpt":0.2867771199123283,"score_spread":0.2636184952018054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388004980","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79176503,0.0017442283,0.0021813526,0.012459561,0.0000824255,0.000028340657,0.000019455729,0.000009439488,0.1917102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99935263,0.00005771576,0.000035862544,0.00016225624,0.00000752689,0.0000018092862,0.0000016443116,0.0000011024047,0.0003794467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97560877,0.015691597,0.00088938966,0.0010505909,0.003715136,0.0030445247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9594428,0.027069982,0.0074831326,0.0013314375,0.0025440648,0.0021286206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021309095,0.00014062258,0.00033462964,0.002675443,0.007271412,0.012605224,0.00066325563,0.0018813135,0.0034419158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037815176,0.0001740403,0.00014896129,0.0026359917,0.02319581,0.0053650844,0.0058313105,0.0024595265,0.00013507801],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008696628,0.00009947957,0.028339203,0.000073409996,0.000037089583,0.00051555946,0.15421386,0.00035165294,0.0002911213,0.79263955,0.0020064316,0.021345695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011706446,0.00023802283,0.106116004,0.0012961884,0.00008170195,0.0005959999,0.4519897,0.0026981994,0.0010015331,0.31016418,0.12556858,0.00013277798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013835007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013137155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021309095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009231848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005491181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11269462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388026880","doi":"10.5040/9781509953875","title":"Constitutionally Conforming Interpretation – Comparative Perspectives","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Scholarship; Popularity; Political science; Context (archaeology); Competence (human resources); Epistemology; Sociology; Law; History; Philosophy; Linguistics; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.07101446074485311,"score_gpt":0.3242657451808155,"score_spread":0.2532512844359624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388026880","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006291659,0.020559514,0.0043064365,0.020586433,0.00088737905,0.000014120347,0.000042217605,0.000026743477,0.9472856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91723484,0.020033292,0.0031506647,0.007068414,0.0023781536,0.00014985423,0.00017608293,0.00016494674,0.04964378],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98665166,0.009327319,0.00023839186,0.0007831506,0.002045453,0.0009539476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922736,0.005975048,0.00028165386,0.00057352934,0.0007106278,0.00018548382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008784193,0.00062163215,0.000794163,0.0037760143,0.010042286,0.015692001,0.00212703,0.005057512,0.005970596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010193922,0.00037603715,0.00053916295,0.0052674967,0.060686566,0.012989667,0.004904696,0.008398232,0.0007192951],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016707485,0.0000025813094,0.000020120571,0.000015309286,7.703535e-7,0.000019261868,0.0025697965,0.000033929788,0.000009219743,0.99450547,0.0017079291,0.0011140056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007789028,0.000012347285,0.00034140178,0.000342142,0.000006537187,0.00013443462,0.011720896,0.00026322878,0.00011566024,0.73708946,0.24995339,0.000012683054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014415217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013224608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017407004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017407004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005972288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12629724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388058106","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780195371208.003.0001","title":"Introduction","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Legitimacy; Political science; Law; Constitution; Jargon; Judicial discretion; Power (physics); Politics; Judicial activism; Discretion; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0336026212217028,"score_gpt":0.26054539118507697,"score_spread":0.22694276996337417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388058106","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00056836475,0.0026877956,0.0017425803,0.008275958,0.006778009,0.00014070248,0.0039498503,0.00081877736,0.97503793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0038994981,0.0019981486,0.0011274096,0.002574375,0.0015380345,0.00009977208,0.0031666632,0.00037209166,0.985224],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989874,0.00011140979,0.000057474226,0.00023912587,0.0004693349,0.00013518757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988569,0.00011623263,0.000049300645,0.00016513624,0.0005665021,0.00024583205],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006530723,0.0008589296,0.0006935889,0.0016071514,0.0021559135,0.006503031,0.0016746544,0.0025516853,0.6755808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00264322,0.00030991892,0.00077003957,0.0015917631,0.000718603,0.0038140414,0.0032862753,0.002404647,0.49339348],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029534749,0.000041408126,0.00020045605,0.00018028155,0.000003472861,0.00008987584,0.00015509895,0.0000914584,0.00019794902,0.03604965,0.86317277,0.09978805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002361942,0.0000066482426,0.00013149486,0.00007119703,0.0000010104923,0.000038024216,0.000047336125,0.000016635013,0.000035624646,0.0020816405,0.99756527,0.0000027285841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040941723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004118573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6755808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025334407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028516392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4627446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388080729","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780195372472.003.0025","title":"Anonymity and the Law in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Anonymity; Unavailability; Identity (music); Internet privacy; Computer science; Computer security; Genealogy; Political science; Engineering; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.023334680036750752,"score_gpt":0.222052528150051,"score_spread":0.19871784811330023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388080729","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012787144,0.0068839225,0.0016159246,0.042433433,0.00048469185,0.00006279678,0.0002748876,0.00005258213,0.9354045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56534207,0.0061492138,0.0014490383,0.01226608,0.00032328267,0.00008129574,0.00012799267,0.000068712245,0.41419232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952834,0.00052528403,0.00010093036,0.00045924273,0.0019342863,0.001696809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99704057,0.00073500007,0.00009443489,0.00015814611,0.0015136364,0.0004581315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019330767,0.000380288,0.00046306817,0.0014722316,0.021011991,0.00991587,0.0017092468,0.005012422,0.013264853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005536041,0.00039475903,0.00041269563,0.0027730537,0.017342843,0.0030988173,0.003520351,0.0062772655,0.00081014837],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004012531,0.0000043648424,0.0001742817,0.000012591978,0.0000018778916,0.00008682567,0.0008989693,0.00018429614,0.000023227565,0.9787038,0.01641661,0.0034892159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021671176,0.000011408488,0.0018785853,0.00023941124,0.000018758737,0.000110721805,0.0022258875,0.0013489962,0.00017341693,0.32432342,0.6695876,0.000060186627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.982407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9813426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12165719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12165719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16285373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8826888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388120681","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198258223.003.0011","title":"The Impact of a Bill of Rights on the Role of the Judiciary: A Canadian Perspective","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Legislature; Constitution; Law; Politics; Bill of rights; Judicial review; Public interest; Fundamental rights; Perspective (graphical); Subject (documents); Legislation; Human rights","score_opus":0.014525185292019377,"score_gpt":0.25903123268835093,"score_spread":0.24450604739633156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388120681","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043443255,0.0073371,0.0019749203,0.034818724,0.00025193696,0.000027543054,0.00014972994,0.000011117092,0.9510846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8203564,0.020513775,0.0041505517,0.011384807,0.0012748985,0.000108793196,0.00017283668,0.000120815705,0.14191706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906859,0.0019868661,0.000113528855,0.00061736815,0.0041837688,0.002412558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946937,0.0020783294,0.00017659947,0.00025297355,0.0021044163,0.0006940515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004825307,0.00093960494,0.00093894004,0.006053054,0.0155850295,0.015466095,0.003703991,0.0064127226,0.016883383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009627584,0.0006675037,0.00086944236,0.0054366244,0.033830013,0.0062523684,0.0034468493,0.007275978,0.0010770459],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023731175,0.0000021235535,0.000029023422,0.000006325363,9.826487e-7,0.000014776459,0.00013536957,0.00018550073,0.000016532837,0.99582916,0.0029440355,0.0008338228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000286311,0.000010233746,0.0015099688,0.00033055848,0.000029109584,0.000050666637,0.0013840457,0.0025139998,0.000115803574,0.83794975,0.15602961,0.00004765272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95387864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9511807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84587497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15412502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08503707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9810951},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4388137250","doi":"10.1515/9781552389911","title":"Law, Politics, and the Judicial Process in Canada, 4th Edition","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Politics; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Computer science; Sociology; Programming language","score_opus":0.014835159550301215,"score_gpt":0.20918638537617792,"score_spread":0.19435122582587672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388137250","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015486018,0.12812902,0.0008464841,0.023788303,0.005264302,0.000089368645,0.0019119381,0.00029463193,0.8381274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017138755,0.08167495,0.0011915214,0.004511725,0.001093718,0.000082748884,0.0011608099,0.00020681058,0.89293885],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859256,0.00005489349,0.000025792255,0.00006636503,0.0010426738,0.00021767002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991572,0.00009817893,0.000027383923,0.000031411997,0.0005573834,0.00012840409],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047527862,0.00095633266,0.0005509584,0.003107553,0.009397658,0.008415623,0.001145528,0.0015621983,0.028156431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018817363,0.00041578244,0.0003337484,0.008089524,0.005000747,0.0021387923,0.0011254171,0.0023747503,0.006896731],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004679348,0.000009343326,0.00016533086,0.00012681168,0.000001987045,0.00005797126,0.0014955904,0.00021070267,0.0000938569,0.06817363,0.8877512,0.041908935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011359133,0.0000011731161,0.0006131759,0.00015125265,0.0000014534759,0.000021308095,0.00042931555,0.000036870846,0.000019326431,0.003164909,0.99555486,0.000005169479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95330137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98181295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08928746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08928746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14535518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64782894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388137317","doi":"10.1515/9781552389911-002","title":"The Rule of Law in the Canadian Constitution","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Rule of law; Political science","score_opus":0.03792333151521577,"score_gpt":0.22821491347310258,"score_spread":0.1902915819578868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388137317","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008492904,0.0147842765,0.001275449,0.028599676,0.0006947003,0.0000403938,0.0001945101,0.00003931459,0.94587886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59952265,0.013284782,0.0022513915,0.009499169,0.0007155774,0.00007070356,0.00017741208,0.000148456,0.37432992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99597436,0.00070892804,0.00008219502,0.0004013843,0.0015277693,0.0013053603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977518,0.0008203905,0.00006417343,0.00016219466,0.00094754,0.0002539331],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028944144,0.0006125835,0.0005786979,0.0029250488,0.017933546,0.014426501,0.0017420779,0.004916668,0.010686536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008410074,0.00067259,0.00038645446,0.0047607343,0.02802721,0.0030982736,0.0016291669,0.0070175347,0.0008895154],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041711924,0.0000032147318,0.00008347581,0.000014479219,0.000001678305,0.000023116641,0.0016738918,0.00016265527,0.000027807218,0.9786081,0.015022253,0.004375124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020438716,0.0000075863213,0.0024333633,0.000294043,0.000020786989,0.00003528854,0.003001329,0.00044655293,0.0001417979,0.30519962,0.6883526,0.000046614336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9874992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.992615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1236942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1236942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1979607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8974684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388147282","doi":"10.1515/9781552389911-017","title":"Chief Justices of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.025192999512104387,"score_gpt":0.2056910773202813,"score_spread":0.18049807780817692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388147282","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028357415,0.022287164,0.00055788003,0.09210817,0.0026945944,0.000091733236,0.0007457265,0.00006176157,0.85309553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34954068,0.0056397202,0.0004259011,0.017284501,0.0005702127,0.00005475522,0.00017715922,0.00008574446,0.62622136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99495345,0.00037144258,0.00008429769,0.00049725757,0.0016544069,0.002439066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99658835,0.0006626984,0.000087372755,0.000116146184,0.0017581602,0.0007873784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019979426,0.0005856203,0.00077437976,0.0020576036,0.037453976,0.011987166,0.0023264051,0.0073013674,0.01843305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008247463,0.0008461976,0.00041736529,0.0029663087,0.0065893345,0.0020740456,0.0021505214,0.010267221,0.0014147963],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004295295,0.000022921284,0.00092678535,0.00004933314,0.00001810087,0.00030867793,0.004238405,0.00028181123,0.00014134483,0.5962211,0.38158908,0.016159523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026331381,0.000009415796,0.004517634,0.0002454742,0.00003386115,0.00005502028,0.005406898,0.0003669021,0.0002958235,0.037711572,0.9512721,0.000058996346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9816316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9954365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10317763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10317763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17631692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7486096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388147283","doi":"10.1515/9781552389911-012","title":"The Harper Conservatives and the Canadian Judiciary","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.031459418632881785,"score_gpt":0.2162678948478779,"score_spread":0.1848084762149961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388147283","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03229779,0.02999257,0.00045660773,0.09571585,0.0011361899,0.00004392448,0.00020673529,0.00005161038,0.8400987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57941556,0.01027156,0.0006028025,0.020652637,0.00053235324,0.000042658194,0.000090621084,0.00008434128,0.3883075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99433786,0.000553697,0.000064820255,0.00038851786,0.0019944988,0.0026606165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99723214,0.00069719297,0.00011398742,0.000118843964,0.0011991545,0.00063872314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029317192,0.00066402316,0.0006692184,0.002971315,0.040276464,0.015531052,0.00211548,0.006310859,0.0117241405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008162593,0.0007013485,0.0003647491,0.0051049283,0.02492839,0.0026327856,0.0026312172,0.010148847,0.00077798625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024508827,0.0000115610965,0.00053383916,0.000029215576,0.0000070804595,0.00008007271,0.007910469,0.00022220328,0.000072639625,0.89710903,0.081403464,0.012595903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026755008,0.000009644635,0.008412799,0.00028099545,0.000025309955,0.000048137343,0.012859735,0.00030704023,0.00013723531,0.08691726,0.89090043,0.00007460935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9939301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19169019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19169019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24148741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9375248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388147289","doi":"10.1515/9781552389911-004","title":"The Canadian Judicial System","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.029930341652388538,"score_gpt":0.21019967364742068,"score_spread":0.18026933199503214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388147289","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003493495,0.0073712077,0.00028536553,0.0205743,0.00049514876,0.000028657843,0.00032675784,0.00004064595,0.9673843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18024598,0.007617343,0.00074418704,0.0075156325,0.00026812305,0.00006932429,0.0002745873,0.00010047752,0.8031643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995531,0.0004346745,0.00006398067,0.00046059885,0.0017213464,0.0017883123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978059,0.00029126593,0.00005096623,0.00014691782,0.0012521609,0.00045285907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017788766,0.00090336805,0.000554969,0.003421211,0.028669275,0.016028447,0.0021677003,0.0047989185,0.043738484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064537134,0.0007026323,0.0004967812,0.005789373,0.0115179,0.003512982,0.0027407177,0.005753893,0.0038029437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000887217,0.000007599169,0.00023668836,0.00002733376,0.0000033819017,0.000043717857,0.0016432476,0.00013632776,0.000034119796,0.81621844,0.16940251,0.0122378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063233483,0.0000036332474,0.0015572046,0.00009946321,0.0000075771923,0.000024456747,0.0021480601,0.0001281288,0.00004973191,0.037478413,0.9584735,0.000023517692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.992679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99638903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17067853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17067853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23013665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96189535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388175302","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198258223.003.0012","title":"The Impact of a Bill of Rights on the Role of the Judiciary: An Australian Perspective","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Appeal; Political science; Law; Government (linguistics); Democracy; Perspective (graphical); Politics","score_opus":0.02736974861988235,"score_gpt":0.3037085387329319,"score_spread":0.27633879011304957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388175302","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012839402,0.004279711,0.0035627168,0.023316586,0.0002512124,0.000022762288,0.000023396562,0.0000062026,0.955698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86648774,0.004327163,0.002384396,0.005808993,0.00090917037,0.00009056928,0.000022145543,0.000046853555,0.119923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.989373,0.005754616,0.00017167006,0.0006713929,0.0025475414,0.0014816404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99474096,0.0029471186,0.00024844968,0.00046897327,0.0010144585,0.0005800045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008102034,0.00056582387,0.0007008844,0.0025325504,0.0072500478,0.011301413,0.0026111496,0.0068097436,0.0100118695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009618487,0.000569353,0.0008011655,0.0016470843,0.035754982,0.00794709,0.0058857123,0.009694747,0.0010000017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015281656,0.0000032602638,0.000017682973,0.0000035128828,6.665012e-7,0.000016527787,0.00034275823,0.000080832375,0.000013850817,0.9985581,0.00049804227,0.00046324774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000150650785,0.000022485166,0.0008922215,0.00018457478,0.000011790001,0.00005724369,0.00097554986,0.001605351,0.00008148906,0.9304073,0.065732844,0.000014092909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057664134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049738366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057664134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017780581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008609115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12900776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388193574","doi":"10.1515/9782763759449-007","title":"La Cour suprême du Canada","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; History; Political science","score_opus":0.024657705322597808,"score_gpt":0.2317779641660716,"score_spread":0.2071202588434738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388193574","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005795823,0.014564674,0.0009534022,0.030171724,0.0016059799,0.000051185478,0.0007175797,0.000109725246,0.9460299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07977866,0.0034047107,0.0006821484,0.008252793,0.00042307537,0.00006942973,0.00017004601,0.00012517427,0.9070938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954461,0.00043538268,0.000071029186,0.000582903,0.0020036479,0.0014608578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873847,0.00031652927,0.000034449833,0.00009428813,0.0006568379,0.0001594219],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016896919,0.0010539095,0.0011063506,0.0023003311,0.02541358,0.013792633,0.0020138964,0.009371443,0.043508433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052588913,0.00092230184,0.0008899371,0.0029454932,0.006726113,0.0028772068,0.0021762725,0.013153319,0.004021284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017425815,0.000014127877,0.00023289879,0.00002496911,0.000008224098,0.00008549649,0.00072448817,0.000175846,0.00007734033,0.88471466,0.10672936,0.0071951584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000194707,0.0000069098946,0.001010584,0.00012995102,0.00001559819,0.000050677038,0.0008772238,0.00023270742,0.00020851225,0.043689057,0.95372623,0.00003308403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97059005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98287576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08050817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08050817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11880535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5841304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388414526","doi":"10.1017/s0003055423001119","title":"Publius’ Proleptic Constitution","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Federalist; Constitution; Polity; Politics; Political science; Law; Federalism; Separation of powers; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.0499977275707965,"score_gpt":0.4003813273920599,"score_spread":0.3503835998212634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388414526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012647173,0.005630484,0.01434051,0.04848624,0.0016274594,0.000057899055,0.00041508087,0.00020558029,0.9165896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65979606,0.008521653,0.012450379,0.028869966,0.0037754625,0.00056790834,0.0004772964,0.00023010196,0.28531113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976173,0.00067402667,0.000097060256,0.00045382962,0.0009267293,0.00023095479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998395,0.0008282641,0.000134607,0.00021038964,0.00037350453,0.000058166916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028280444,0.00029920673,0.00020433714,0.0016155472,0.0027502992,0.0047162515,0.00056803453,0.002415945,0.0047288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006996994,0.0002883207,0.0002771095,0.0010300261,0.009717076,0.0028627806,0.0017038283,0.005305641,0.0016112062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027369324,0.0000017033378,0.000027866225,0.000013626229,8.0922706e-7,0.0000142586905,0.000349306,0.00003920376,0.000024895575,0.9864326,0.0104268445,0.0026662939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000122693245,0.000015660562,0.00049375475,0.000106473024,0.000007602955,0.00014593998,0.00023846631,0.00036209458,0.00038160014,0.38619632,0.61202884,0.000010923287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006079032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042226277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006079032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042799497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003990229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031053424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388416911","doi":"10.1093/law/9780192870520.003.0002","title":"The Constitutionalization of Conflicts Within the UK","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Phenomenon; Phrase; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Epistemology; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05740961253823524,"score_gpt":0.25932051553838986,"score_spread":0.20191090300015463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388416911","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045266982,0.011223368,0.0034349153,0.020006882,0.00063626684,0.00006930076,0.00023005216,0.000037949645,0.91909444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9265167,0.0022494865,0.00058375706,0.0020018877,0.00016001062,0.000057572186,0.00006861322,0.000018799608,0.06834309],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923334,0.0033414315,0.0005409124,0.0008443403,0.001527286,0.0014125066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955382,0.0023578242,0.00040049688,0.00059443223,0.0008062101,0.000302785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030050871,0.00023142854,0.00030027347,0.0013311051,0.0048972634,0.008228681,0.0008485111,0.0025773433,0.011918312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009066636,0.00034622438,0.00018819375,0.0021264055,0.013657433,0.0031627784,0.0036661006,0.003614246,0.0008702828],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012361753,0.0000036991196,0.0001500754,0.00003206783,0.0000022428615,0.00012924483,0.0059252842,0.00024972679,0.00011903628,0.98178506,0.0059948782,0.005596278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037892118,0.000030670024,0.0030785953,0.0004646344,0.00001396396,0.00019417041,0.0058804513,0.00046367562,0.00047007014,0.19270463,0.7966057,0.000055493463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.147987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15569572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.147987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02243973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009472438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29425126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388433419","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199535415.003.0001","title":"Bridging comparative politics and comparative constitutional law: Constitutional design in divided societies","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law; Autonomy; Constitutional law; Ethnic group","score_opus":0.1883365849591741,"score_gpt":0.3349527442980406,"score_spread":0.14661615933886651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388433419","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025970649,0.019768193,0.076411314,0.0361799,0.00072129525,0.0001209304,0.000121561745,0.00008780531,0.8406184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96134347,0.003914844,0.014413214,0.0019676522,0.00043231845,0.00031285596,0.00010211316,0.00008056582,0.01743299],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97982705,0.017583402,0.0002478183,0.00076602906,0.001175647,0.00039998002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97484267,0.02146046,0.0005715611,0.0018532316,0.000917652,0.0003544878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019853592,0.00039760215,0.0006618993,0.0037554083,0.0055177426,0.013246193,0.0018682692,0.0026000561,0.011584196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022787841,0.00031606,0.0003045889,0.003963232,0.0515558,0.012957121,0.005400235,0.0044133808,0.00049048295],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012247475,0.0000016258027,0.000016545322,0.0000089375,5.698441e-7,0.000006513105,0.00076365675,0.00005171787,0.0000053852264,0.9971431,0.0004602092,0.0015403786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050733024,0.000006569212,0.00009848261,0.00012279255,0.0000018797142,0.000017897564,0.0017220309,0.00024388192,0.000042551714,0.9646155,0.033120017,0.0000033067058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002268387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027979426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019853592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010083678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039906595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1049971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388665567","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4603889","title":"Is Judicial Review Fit for Purpose?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Canada West","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.05165554099753812,"score_gpt":0.35813677547569744,"score_spread":0.30648123447815934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388665567","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.072331026,0.0060313474,0.014738334,0.5661806,0.0025108801,0.00013927222,0.00033626455,0.00027905757,0.33745322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9431502,0.0011634215,0.0015585956,0.043397624,0.0021318535,0.0001411857,0.000086513646,0.00017016429,0.008200471],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9247494,0.043438926,0.0020701976,0.0048649553,0.012516057,0.012360448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7993163,0.120749556,0.018582556,0.023691902,0.024360813,0.013298852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.063062705,0.00036510517,0.0020624136,0.004461439,0.007990727,0.020178534,0.0026899634,0.01912452,0.0114661865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.252342,0.000726795,0.00090796966,0.0040207496,0.031648763,0.019847963,0.004020051,0.010234391,0.004698898],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110480454,0.00013652314,0.010458085,0.00012160897,0.0000739307,0.00018419478,0.0046942686,0.00020264034,0.00016702602,0.9174977,0.03696019,0.029393358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009169341,0.000080336846,0.009716876,0.0004251205,0.00005365073,0.00028713318,0.0065469453,0.0006130212,0.00025579982,0.9169561,0.06490472,0.00006846246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004919078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007873022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.063062705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005589583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017281491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33351147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388823179","doi":"10.4337/9781800378346.00005","title":"Introduction to the Research Handbook on Law and Political Systems","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Legislation; Politics; Legislature; Political science; Institution; Law; Executive branch; Law and economics; Political system; Sociology","score_opus":0.0941911047917499,"score_gpt":0.3305717902294218,"score_spread":0.23638068543767188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388823179","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00060521835,0.13827336,0.007171932,0.01853553,0.0024965638,0.000046042256,0.0010529733,0.00026063426,0.8315578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01767227,0.19705999,0.010363965,0.007603206,0.0036987318,0.00019347963,0.0017001531,0.0004006715,0.76130754],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994961,0.0001552713,0.00003450254,0.00006144903,0.00021514132,0.00003738136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984445,0.001147425,0.00005603885,0.000080601574,0.00019309457,0.00007835414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054516154,0.00073346664,0.0007621043,0.0027914576,0.0011972534,0.004030219,0.0008955418,0.0013595038,0.07822128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017596915,0.00043389716,0.00041150235,0.006022403,0.0020479115,0.0045393193,0.0010309283,0.0026669672,0.026492462],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043517875,0.000026197973,0.00015418565,0.00047076104,0.0000061210817,0.00007048598,0.0010008534,0.0003647373,0.00010074865,0.35842675,0.55097157,0.08840334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012341758,0.0000024622143,0.00019488219,0.00033108523,0.0000016895443,0.00006765971,0.00020256829,0.000060795184,0.000018181681,0.051917832,0.9471985,0.0000030816477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043532006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009687021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07822128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002396058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025623266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26167625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388865469","doi":"10.1515/zfrs-2023-1016","title":"Hubert Treiber and the <b> <i>Sociology of Law</i> </b> of Max Weber: From the Ideal Types of Legal Rationality to the Plurality of Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Sociology of law; Empirical legal studies; Legal realism; Law; Sociology; Legal pluralism; Legal profession; Pluralism (philosophy); Jurisprudence; State (computer science); Ideal (ethics); Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06732455426831413,"score_gpt":0.3534023753903444,"score_spread":0.2860778211220303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388865469","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02612661,0.19445528,0.01505956,0.30899528,0.0045405887,0.00005206297,0.00020025687,0.00012658864,0.4504438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8166535,0.092757635,0.004998166,0.012763288,0.0065322043,0.00012676432,0.00007083254,0.0001436624,0.06595413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998654,0.0006578236,0.000041834333,0.00016677637,0.00035551024,0.00012406302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99722207,0.0019411634,0.00027532238,0.00013042407,0.0002702027,0.00016086265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002318339,0.0004473372,0.00040711995,0.0025092377,0.0030052916,0.005310883,0.00050945894,0.0025840118,0.004012381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005153217,0.00031391977,0.00023699903,0.0019795906,0.0129964305,0.006260141,0.0013341276,0.0025241526,0.00064435246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009539308,0.000012252919,0.00006472509,0.00004036961,0.000002706523,0.000053351403,0.0011577538,0.00022800798,0.0001097766,0.9666499,0.026377182,0.005294561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000807431,0.000011761663,0.00037991142,0.00037745744,0.000004645596,0.000069465685,0.0007504395,0.0005001553,0.0002494856,0.7536462,0.24398255,0.000019923084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010196283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069577307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010196283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066220015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024172016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04804623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388877431","doi":"10.5040/9781509953639","title":"Constitutional Courts, Media and Public Opinion","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Supreme court; Public opinion; Politics; Legitimacy","score_opus":0.07718578439243645,"score_gpt":0.28850049768596153,"score_spread":0.21131471329352508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388877431","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014374099,0.043429602,0.002890258,0.12178134,0.0013362882,0.000024814633,0.00014628736,0.000075857424,0.8159415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89736295,0.0219921,0.0011602105,0.015160447,0.0043783025,0.000083309686,0.00013108691,0.000053834086,0.059677824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958962,0.00232118,0.000121872035,0.0002861155,0.00090369774,0.00047085772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99153745,0.006914053,0.00055910466,0.000303905,0.00047002264,0.00021560308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026515117,0.00033893855,0.00032776486,0.0025199135,0.0047886153,0.014226049,0.001040708,0.004042984,0.010661625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01086009,0.0002313588,0.00025238903,0.0039033697,0.017710168,0.011137984,0.002597443,0.0033395865,0.00089594856],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053802723,0.000007821346,0.00013256817,0.00003948599,0.0000025987813,0.000049959544,0.002527208,0.00008393918,0.00003730541,0.9765742,0.012787473,0.0077522118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018242852,0.000019401848,0.0009508993,0.0003777681,0.000009732658,0.00010371972,0.0064804438,0.00033793115,0.00019387894,0.59155357,0.3999391,0.00001536233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005383988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040582274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014226049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005162243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025197086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037454844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388919582","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4613080","title":"The Inaccessibility of Justice in Ontario’s Adjudicative Tribunals: Symptoms and Diagnosis","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Law","score_opus":0.02409003021726633,"score_gpt":0.31516843341678713,"score_spread":0.29107840319952083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388919582","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9414111,0.00034147888,0.00016845755,0.014475235,0.000040675583,0.00005811574,0.00015480013,0.000008797131,0.043341447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974141,0.00009731276,0.000058209323,0.00041286417,0.000012304261,0.000011035686,0.000032247295,0.0000047761946,0.0019570973],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954325,0.00068278017,0.0002535369,0.00024801024,0.0017607864,0.0016223926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97609895,0.0064436933,0.00645173,0.00088558544,0.0066240337,0.0034960192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003971417,0.00015419582,0.00026782093,0.0032546762,0.01585652,0.0045919036,0.002226088,0.0025954675,0.0024683387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03831654,0.00038575754,0.0002802954,0.004631859,0.015668714,0.0027128458,0.0044025993,0.0035660637,0.00015350456],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024929634,0.00016647534,0.50769407,0.000116350035,0.000029435154,0.0034685868,0.3736651,0.0002493634,0.0008353931,0.068552956,0.01999003,0.02498295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027874776,0.000049002443,0.5877088,0.00021094379,0.000027487407,0.00078343967,0.36472723,0.0005328835,0.0003574139,0.010046104,0.035461772,0.000067021596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91597617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96690905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08402383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04472062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0719601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3244723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389136120","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4616700","title":"15 Why Law Was Late to Comparative Constitutional Amendment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Amendment; Constitutional law; Political science; First amendment; Supreme court","score_opus":0.04329779320689511,"score_gpt":0.33237400512678833,"score_spread":0.2890762119198932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389136120","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037631795,0.005913309,0.010758264,0.34725124,0.0055336403,0.000069841575,0.0002649908,0.00019160671,0.5923853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81925017,0.0009896113,0.0038367095,0.075194634,0.0023954466,0.000121178025,0.000104285406,0.0004342059,0.09767379],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911842,0.0039672023,0.00024708867,0.0017103272,0.0012327363,0.0016584351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.979122,0.01261896,0.0007326618,0.0023313495,0.004041394,0.0011535955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019483374,0.00026648067,0.0006753854,0.0019555124,0.010432949,0.012984477,0.0017398206,0.014397038,0.026035504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060759824,0.00066783646,0.00057296176,0.0014698165,0.031196548,0.021015763,0.00343105,0.015946127,0.0025616603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005203687,0.0000034450673,0.000067218774,0.00000867879,0.0000012884772,0.000014853531,0.0010083629,0.00001033911,0.000024471798,0.989899,0.0076161665,0.0013409887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022967828,0.000015683116,0.00052121584,0.00014798014,0.0000065473405,0.00005439754,0.0027336555,0.00010469413,0.00033687145,0.75468373,0.24135196,0.000020258562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01665472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020066487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026035504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012714971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009484548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.103039145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389241932","doi":"10.4000/bresils.15641","title":"Entre peanut butter et pé-de-moleque : incursions comparatives dans les modalités de décision à la majorité de la Cour suprême des États-Unis et du Tribunal fédéral suprême du Brésil","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Brésil(s)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Tribunal; Philosophy; Art; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03826113989243637,"score_gpt":0.33700064024129767,"score_spread":0.2987395003488613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389241932","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6854697,0.0028270553,0.0018322987,0.0058853584,0.00007739363,0.000020523315,0.000033340915,0.000005720061,0.30384862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991213,0.00042397447,0.00021373211,0.00039480193,0.000015758571,0.000007703082,0.0000072835387,0.0000040354544,0.0077197948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978027,0.0009807515,0.000053360556,0.00029207082,0.00046812758,0.00040285368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99235713,0.006188533,0.00043364277,0.0001979358,0.0006226289,0.00020017677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047882134,0.00014657041,0.00022063454,0.0013436088,0.005428485,0.0063851345,0.00057273,0.0012463209,0.0059234607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00926403,0.0001595251,0.00019653013,0.0014477437,0.016497742,0.0026411053,0.0021575647,0.0024922215,0.00016680779],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009056384,0.000024431898,0.0046079587,0.000053841417,0.000012019237,0.00016866002,0.042339463,0.00014516113,0.00081441796,0.9414475,0.0008128522,0.009483069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008175406,0.00034065868,0.12352568,0.0009688395,0.00011753716,0.00034176017,0.3442919,0.0012506034,0.006762129,0.27727565,0.2449351,0.00010829249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07123128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19923852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07123128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00900774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005928093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14163333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389332845","doi":"10.7202/1107319ar","title":"L’AVÈNEMENT DU CONSTITUTIONNALISME EN OCCIDENT : FONDEMENTS PHILOSOPHIQUES ET CONTINGENCE HISTORIQUE","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04301885085924121,"score_gpt":0.24834310931287926,"score_spread":0.20532425845363805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389332845","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24213098,0.015638499,0.0076744915,0.064376116,0.0004631028,0.00002049656,0.00007455875,0.00003470099,0.6695871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805164,0.0021552306,0.00075668335,0.00084503734,0.0001258776,0.000009536895,0.00001013802,0.000012464854,0.015568673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887556,0.00055121357,0.00002067517,0.00013827402,0.00018321126,0.00023096152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847394,0.00089563447,0.00015958928,0.00013471449,0.00019510332,0.00014100382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025071786,0.00020268874,0.00016985701,0.0011174195,0.0074940105,0.0062771733,0.00055230095,0.0013763352,0.004110115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027228906,0.00014388374,0.00016472519,0.0015154277,0.030858863,0.0028427974,0.001711696,0.0034307584,0.00015988524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065491263,0.0000027893068,0.0005064035,0.000013516956,0.0000012416868,0.000039313203,0.009681351,0.000061989536,0.000043915516,0.986272,0.00068120216,0.0026898219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003802139,0.000044083718,0.014266848,0.0004811571,0.000024266692,0.0003661143,0.04173321,0.00058909436,0.0009850047,0.45305607,0.48836508,0.000051021438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06986142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14096951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06986142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012939886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00780463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13890952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389355427","doi":"10.7202/1105804ar","title":"LA PERTINENCE EN CONTEXTE CANADIEN DE LA JURISPRUDENCE CONSTITUTIONNELLE DU CONSEIL PRIVÉ RELATIVE À L’INDÉPENDANCE JUDICIAIRE","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010352107094561311,"score_gpt":0.22781976247134508,"score_spread":0.21746765537678378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389355427","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10862008,0.010393415,0.008425316,0.016086893,0.0003833438,0.000041236966,0.000111364774,0.000030087522,0.8559083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95706666,0.0035666435,0.0013254255,0.0014227722,0.00009262593,0.000049589773,0.000052730276,0.00003426241,0.03638934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99551326,0.0016229497,0.000086204935,0.00067974813,0.0012756563,0.0008222568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973653,0.0013429483,0.00025078634,0.0003019835,0.00044928645,0.00028976204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024208562,0.00040095625,0.0005802515,0.0019637696,0.009953052,0.012107667,0.0010569284,0.0025047387,0.013929108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056862193,0.0002904033,0.00042241707,0.0031036998,0.01906713,0.00530356,0.0065806354,0.005362948,0.00082013174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011704388,0.0000074807986,0.0009894168,0.00005191471,0.0000135662485,0.00015850263,0.013732797,0.00018048269,0.00016175957,0.9794958,0.00083330326,0.004363321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003243008,0.00005471844,0.019859865,0.0008361819,0.00008622394,0.00051736285,0.053937476,0.0005816426,0.0006656287,0.40874484,0.5145953,0.00008827071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10462283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18353625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.984339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015660986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014890891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20802772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389510901","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-30844-4_9","title":"Common Law Systems and COVID-19 Policy Response: Protective Public Health Policy in the United States, Canada, New Zealand, and Australia","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Law; Common law; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Public administration; Geography; Medicine","score_opus":0.1326050488057124,"score_gpt":0.3749535822558368,"score_spread":0.24234853345012441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389510901","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047312867,0.012681108,0.0030656015,0.22450574,0.00095444865,0.00021568699,0.00018516456,0.000050312385,0.71102905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78928506,0.0055350666,0.0015540149,0.025185853,0.0004417685,0.000172396,0.00009188834,0.00006183593,0.17767204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.989528,0.0037649076,0.00019281464,0.0005557298,0.0021735518,0.0037849003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922661,0.003936678,0.000476054,0.00029245924,0.0017498257,0.0012788284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010357003,0.00041131605,0.00060092716,0.0024832685,0.013327819,0.016039515,0.0025246895,0.008004353,0.007951908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0234819,0.00056711485,0.0005807318,0.0030549166,0.03456161,0.0044230144,0.0045436546,0.008681192,0.00049661903],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059373683,0.000017937884,0.00056486524,0.000018997402,0.000004245545,0.00007422408,0.006547617,0.00020746104,0.00003942586,0.97334045,0.014498551,0.0046802904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004260606,0.00004750457,0.018759126,0.0006996899,0.00004115038,0.00010863706,0.0287748,0.0020600734,0.00031025376,0.5482908,0.40077493,0.000090493595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86948764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9092866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13051236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08134228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18479314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5901823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389692223","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4657352","title":"Legislative Measures and Legislators' Motives","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.023490523188233938,"score_gpt":0.29270822514453027,"score_spread":0.26921770195629635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389692223","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7619879,0.0007131166,0.004053886,0.01079352,0.00014293131,0.00012377415,0.000118158394,0.000080520105,0.22198609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940309,0.000060293078,0.000399702,0.00030720906,0.000043105058,0.000046109686,0.000017530296,0.000016924994,0.005078274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900624,0.005527303,0.00038687052,0.00069306226,0.0016486881,0.0016816064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9678675,0.02020872,0.005273995,0.0014587897,0.0025175393,0.0026734865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012338139,0.000260919,0.0004962083,0.0030689058,0.0032245126,0.0074210144,0.0009577984,0.002411706,0.009971795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038050037,0.00043860843,0.0003250749,0.0022724972,0.0039336355,0.0023374308,0.0018949666,0.0021012153,0.0007567476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021774905,0.00030473337,0.079946116,0.00011974536,0.00007573515,0.00013338447,0.01566697,0.000498265,0.0010882907,0.86648566,0.0043803207,0.031083085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039802623,0.00062250404,0.41055077,0.00037559972,0.00036831177,0.00036844038,0.06492191,0.008141677,0.0042125816,0.37357917,0.13630469,0.00015634391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014553332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004849382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012338139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018782611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022903015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06525111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389819517","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-6519-1_106","title":"Institutionalism: Legal","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; New institutionalism; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.06895375766515942,"score_gpt":0.3034887738905027,"score_spread":0.23453501622534328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389819517","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009757961,0.0054267296,0.0030850456,0.012942826,0.00046908698,0.000027578293,0.000056118406,0.000032522636,0.9769843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19257645,0.005617312,0.0020701063,0.010922113,0.0022075018,0.0002676183,0.00012989683,0.00015419761,0.7860548],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869376,0.0005895086,0.000025793786,0.00016410179,0.00034406118,0.00018273457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906963,0.0004916598,0.00004481523,0.00016879769,0.0001479091,0.00007726552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016862754,0.0006009661,0.0006357218,0.0013783153,0.0044229133,0.0097533865,0.0015968673,0.005074244,0.030478247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033301406,0.0004041876,0.00028096698,0.0016915301,0.01851116,0.0071191094,0.0024556746,0.0059613036,0.0047327424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.74232e-7,0.0000040632317,0.000004667404,0.000004337217,3.1054196e-7,0.0000036794816,0.00011645886,0.000023536859,0.000005403621,0.9888574,0.009836945,0.0011425335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043943246,0.0000027581923,0.000047154408,0.000047081794,0.0000012069938,0.000014820934,0.00029114587,0.000110099456,0.00003473299,0.8303496,0.16909383,0.0000030698284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0148392655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019022988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030478247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007242525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070760134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.101959884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389879431","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192871787.013.11","title":"Judicial System","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Jurisdiction; Politics; Supreme court; Law; Context (archaeology); Judicial independence; Judicial activism; Judicial review; Geography","score_opus":0.04804259489002626,"score_gpt":0.2346829427959428,"score_spread":0.18664034790591652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389879431","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065758657,0.005082421,0.0016191645,0.0032452897,0.00024695985,0.000024680056,0.00021216182,0.00005695204,0.9829365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5998738,0.006455951,0.0015241088,0.0019059228,0.00096941233,0.000096009026,0.00064317015,0.00007171712,0.38845995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999057,0.00029148738,0.000031404234,0.00019550063,0.000271248,0.00015329561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954575,0.00017172155,0.000033942826,0.000058115453,0.000152255,0.000038141658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054830126,0.0002908796,0.00017903633,0.0015425105,0.0021908905,0.0034613097,0.0004882479,0.00093932974,0.033180375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001084865,0.00010383293,0.00017162308,0.0015098325,0.0031671727,0.0011168842,0.001004589,0.0010352319,0.003622045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003220687,0.0000043218065,0.0001108008,0.000032887085,0.0000012020421,0.000026508456,0.0007294986,0.00018407502,0.0001105264,0.9713246,0.01573458,0.011737715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010187477,0.000023756202,0.0019708534,0.0002537683,0.000005738325,0.00011940535,0.000863182,0.00050804723,0.0002780704,0.12949575,0.8664594,0.000011771022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010566784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010496007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033180375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040596905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002480813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.110999465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389915095","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192898579.013.14","title":"Network Analysis for the Comparative Study of Judicial Behaviour","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Social network analysis; Normative; Set (abstract data type); Network analysis; Social network (sociolinguistics); Core (optical fiber); Data science; Computer science; Political science; Law; Social media; Engineering","score_opus":0.11123635738113133,"score_gpt":0.2965150058964228,"score_spread":0.1852786485152915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389915095","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024000239,0.01896822,0.7468471,0.009331768,0.0010879547,0.00036717977,0.003118956,0.00067226996,0.19560637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39266044,0.02052155,0.5414041,0.0010991332,0.0008602175,0.0017889991,0.0038687254,0.00054359686,0.037253138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99710494,0.002018502,0.00008507763,0.000271619,0.00045870667,0.00006114712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9814833,0.016131299,0.00068994187,0.00080740184,0.0006617563,0.0002263256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029427581,0.0005661168,0.00056318665,0.0056549353,0.0009076068,0.0027818957,0.0007345151,0.00085336354,0.017794251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014789756,0.00025951874,0.0005302944,0.0075241784,0.0020641123,0.003705133,0.0014217828,0.0013765312,0.001439624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027389282,0.000028152568,0.0027041873,0.00053812325,0.0000754548,0.0001089787,0.0012826556,0.008137807,0.0003967316,0.85268295,0.02291601,0.11110157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069882567,0.000023480448,0.003993506,0.00054049137,0.00003220256,0.00012687457,0.0011924595,0.0377032,0.00019438771,0.84230083,0.11385865,0.000026926014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031327934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047315885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017794251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025807312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015481146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059527695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389922831","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192898579.013.3","title":"The Global Expansion of Judicial Power","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Judicial activism; Political science; Power (physics); Law; Discipline; Judicial review; Resistance (ecology); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.034436612911094566,"score_gpt":0.2476385852270863,"score_spread":0.21320197231599172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389922831","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033524286,0.017455477,0.0018003901,0.011016537,0.00025556659,0.000008204524,0.00006794273,0.00003585832,0.9358358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9082841,0.019692196,0.0011936607,0.003635718,0.0008728499,0.000027539572,0.000100068,0.00006807483,0.06612584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989802,0.0004063293,0.000027950087,0.00022415294,0.00022807096,0.0001332693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991015,0.00045465393,0.00007317093,0.00015053485,0.00016608399,0.00005411843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009200506,0.00019868066,0.00024038512,0.0013732322,0.0011353283,0.0043459316,0.00033535846,0.00083101215,0.009060605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009488817,0.00014005572,0.00018700298,0.0022305779,0.007237326,0.002628127,0.002248566,0.0021490823,0.0006305048],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009780796,0.000008770945,0.0007360036,0.00007532803,0.000008358446,0.00014384047,0.005565808,0.0005181339,0.00042367718,0.9416536,0.011314,0.03954282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012955821,0.000033667522,0.008258671,0.00046104012,0.00001818341,0.00041439215,0.0072192783,0.0007097363,0.00040403704,0.2494921,0.73295933,0.000016611251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025858288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005332276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009060605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002281166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010353931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03031069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389989499","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4670775","title":"Legislative Measures and Legislators' Motives","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.023490523188233938,"score_gpt":0.29270822514453027,"score_spread":0.26921770195629635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389989499","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7619879,0.0007131166,0.004053886,0.01079352,0.00014293131,0.00012377415,0.000118158394,0.000080520105,0.22198609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940309,0.000060293078,0.000399702,0.00030720906,0.000043105058,0.000046109686,0.000017530296,0.000016924994,0.005078274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900624,0.005527303,0.00038687052,0.00069306226,0.0016486881,0.0016816064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9678675,0.02020872,0.005273995,0.0014587897,0.0025175393,0.0026734865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012338139,0.000260919,0.0004962083,0.0030689058,0.0032245126,0.0074210144,0.0009577984,0.002411706,0.009971795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038050037,0.00043860843,0.0003250749,0.0022724972,0.0039336355,0.0023374308,0.0018949666,0.0021012153,0.0007567476],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021774905,0.00030473337,0.079946116,0.00011974536,0.00007573515,0.00013338447,0.01566697,0.000498265,0.0010882907,0.86648566,0.0043803207,0.031083085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039802623,0.00062250404,0.41055077,0.00037559972,0.00036831177,0.00036844038,0.06492191,0.008141677,0.0042125816,0.37357917,0.13630469,0.00015634391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014553332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004849382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012338139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018782611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022903015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06525111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390284047","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-45347-2","title":"Against Post-Liberal Courts and Justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Palgrave studies in classical liberalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"York University; University of Ontario Institute of Technology","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0858273650546957,"score_gpt":0.3666476304423585,"score_spread":0.2808202653876628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390284047","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023148265,0.008704471,0.0029342733,0.09407541,0.0011517077,0.0000408525,0.00007510314,0.00003208697,0.8698378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7712039,0.0020866583,0.0008921978,0.026453894,0.0019421397,0.00013242544,0.00003206597,0.000069635185,0.19718717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99441373,0.0025863608,0.00009584583,0.00060403766,0.0012553673,0.001044535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945905,0.0036634186,0.00021608017,0.0005865445,0.0006508953,0.00029255167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068904795,0.00045215656,0.0007409002,0.0014584791,0.011117876,0.0118489545,0.0017604664,0.01205542,0.0087195495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012003459,0.0004094681,0.0003701305,0.0020020495,0.05224153,0.0067644054,0.004003684,0.016515005,0.0010807888],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013473203,0.0000033278354,0.000008474068,0.0000021080891,5.2911275e-7,0.000005651933,0.00047070524,0.000012663055,0.000005824469,0.9965597,0.0023839227,0.0005457694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011343759,0.0000048358143,0.00015369395,0.00004590662,0.0000030375995,0.00001567765,0.0009286792,0.00009251389,0.00006734971,0.9448534,0.053817227,0.000006328649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021554418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040206492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021554418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008924938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009518883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0647552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390284071","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-45347-2_3","title":"Securing Constitutional Democracy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave studies in classical liberalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; General partnership; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.1248713589527326,"score_gpt":0.36578618646514993,"score_spread":0.24091482751241733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390284071","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007941983,0.0021334642,0.0067189597,0.020164479,0.00059577654,0.000044200628,0.00006269463,0.00006807132,0.96227044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51240146,0.0015152812,0.004212271,0.0099804485,0.0006675639,0.00018180556,0.00009409173,0.00015942383,0.4707876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978174,0.0008918605,0.00005792209,0.0003555885,0.0005161176,0.00036110656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845636,0.00062633713,0.000098073106,0.0004635631,0.00021594993,0.00013972992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032239808,0.0003080745,0.00035272128,0.0006293962,0.0044003613,0.0058418605,0.0007162167,0.0029932272,0.01898367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072612995,0.0002447727,0.00021909144,0.0006534057,0.014398486,0.0043024123,0.003249784,0.0055674347,0.0032180194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017661803,0.0000045274965,0.000025759642,0.000004871472,6.5820274e-7,0.000007691182,0.00034075155,0.000043032782,0.000034719997,0.98934597,0.006405442,0.003784852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005470435,0.000009052701,0.00018118981,0.00005198948,0.0000021426495,0.000023409395,0.0004589992,0.00012439852,0.00023537478,0.8535603,0.14534336,0.0000042980173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002930947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006112135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01898367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034664087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042647156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06350666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390504654","doi":"10.54254/2753-7048/35/20232078","title":"Voting Procedure of President Election","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Voting; Political science; Focus (optics); General election; Voting behavior; Public relations; Public administration; Public economics; Political economy; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.02349087201682615,"score_gpt":0.36130965840524704,"score_spread":0.3378187863884209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390504654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5457659,0.0010433142,0.059667684,0.0018157596,0.002962695,0.0037475717,0.010448706,0.0012728194,0.37327555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87968355,0.00031840886,0.02834347,0.00032162876,0.0005346824,0.0013837173,0.0046402854,0.00027417595,0.08450002],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939095,0.002783743,0.00050236256,0.00071797066,0.0014204199,0.00066611153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99046236,0.0046445853,0.00067974697,0.001387899,0.0023058273,0.00051964103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005243299,0.00022258075,0.0003678444,0.0017877411,0.0014852753,0.0012450418,0.00044429547,0.00052864436,0.02816539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023070987,0.00017469136,0.00040293383,0.0011424054,0.00031074588,0.00050967897,0.00066879636,0.0007577488,0.008509633],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033330438,0.0005633248,0.08809727,0.00055665086,0.000099880366,0.00056292414,0.0043999786,0.0025988745,0.012985527,0.07837727,0.07483873,0.73358655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026644926,0.0022762592,0.36004746,0.0002162907,0.00016776426,0.0010088508,0.0037581478,0.015119176,0.022214167,0.025500184,0.5692248,0.0002005198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015411511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030688343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02816539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005966145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011675305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.094222665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390519823","doi":"10.1163/22134514-bja10066","title":"Rule by Metrics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University; Harvard University; Brigham Young University; University of Toronto; Yale University","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Argument (complex analysis); Task (project management); Order (exchange); Intervention (counseling); Data science; Computer science; Management science; Political science; Law; Business; Psychology; Economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05201412681779061,"score_gpt":0.3097679852978599,"score_spread":0.2577538584800693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390519823","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009061188,0.0027748717,0.6893229,0.0172919,0.0012951584,0.00044633856,0.0010758077,0.000836795,0.27789506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5221917,0.004057835,0.39296874,0.0053655496,0.0024256993,0.0015824554,0.0024842676,0.0010260954,0.067897566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96764094,0.01203734,0.0033976005,0.008112565,0.0075358967,0.0012756528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95268613,0.021730894,0.0032318793,0.01420542,0.0069143805,0.0012312828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01647061,0.0012360557,0.0019807064,0.003469904,0.0030456681,0.014006281,0.003123368,0.00428331,0.016142147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06394271,0.0006529706,0.0020855593,0.0036609995,0.01532085,0.014013895,0.006113882,0.0057383645,0.0053664614],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000787806,0.000011164163,0.00038955518,0.000054455908,0.000018500321,0.00003932057,0.00014891215,0.001737662,0.000075121636,0.9780617,0.004414392,0.015041396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008083984,0.000012721336,0.00011406111,0.00005664616,0.000010321248,0.000054366104,0.00005881355,0.004206313,0.0001440022,0.9620431,0.033278666,0.0000129004775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003648191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026657218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01647061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004054792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00475769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08710593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390817485","doi":"10.1017/lsi.2023.82","title":"A Fair Process Matters: The Relationship between Public Participation and Constitutional Legitimacy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Social Inquiry","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Georg-August-Universität Göttingen","keywords":"Constitution; Legitimacy; Public participation; Political science; Process (computing); Law; Public relations; Public administration; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.2305964696203343,"score_gpt":0.42481747096253486,"score_spread":0.19422100134220055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390817485","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90763545,0.00024541165,0.0039913,0.0060741035,0.000049497627,0.00012425843,0.000044811815,0.0000222792,0.08181291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992435,0.00003770448,0.0002516411,0.00010643617,0.00001756767,0.000029980929,0.000006801881,0.000003184878,0.0003032946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9745486,0.01796533,0.0007961405,0.0017914554,0.0031362218,0.0017622766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7272196,0.22725116,0.024912637,0.011604477,0.005238512,0.0037736322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021737983,0.00026819296,0.00054505037,0.0014921834,0.0030379102,0.0054758377,0.00094500306,0.002950404,0.012309897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1461318,0.0002604736,0.00050014205,0.001486834,0.018097425,0.008174669,0.004587529,0.003859761,0.00041173835],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018234128,0.0045612566,0.22489491,0.0005898644,0.0003050265,0.0008306126,0.060573034,0.0032951396,0.0046228706,0.6138978,0.0020455716,0.08256049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009248447,0.0020237507,0.42501447,0.00043800878,0.0003507189,0.0004402008,0.050653297,0.007434253,0.0036205542,0.48773074,0.02119008,0.00017910391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022098771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016110267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021737983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019218543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022736348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.114962816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390868163","doi":"","title":"Les rapports entre Cours suprêmes et législateurs dans les systèmes constitutionnels de Common Law : recherches comparées sur la troisième voie du constitutionnalisme et la protection renouvelée des droits et libertés Etats-Unis, Canada, Royaume-Uni","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"book","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.040679737193915155,"score_gpt":0.26798917446793175,"score_spread":0.2273094372740166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390868163","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5823217,0.0077041853,0.010723971,0.012783663,0.00010547912,0.00023216063,0.00073002616,0.00007197545,0.3853269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9697701,0.0014875762,0.001931302,0.00036918823,0.000011302752,0.00006532875,0.0001027497,0.000022424336,0.026240002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99399394,0.0019138574,0.00014581127,0.0007092303,0.0023606294,0.0008764618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98943514,0.0062810406,0.0011899138,0.00035104953,0.0022907574,0.0004522418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061014504,0.00026374578,0.0003556301,0.002703802,0.008584398,0.011373338,0.0009851003,0.000961206,0.0074156104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018411357,0.00031283108,0.00028311845,0.0057651126,0.0128678,0.0029023117,0.0024997352,0.0018007922,0.00032151377],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009542186,0.000025002266,0.02720882,0.0002910845,0.00005650114,0.00016841922,0.12578395,0.0013147581,0.0008406526,0.801484,0.004141505,0.0385898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078554905,0.00012422846,0.3383648,0.0011854647,0.00037642726,0.00016419894,0.17496426,0.0037813252,0.0057146153,0.0905787,0.3844494,0.00021799926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87195206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.931844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12804794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06010532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06913603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43609667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390983043","doi":"10.51644/9781771123563-005","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada and the Convention","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Convention; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.021949386201766015,"score_gpt":0.24080677384176194,"score_spread":0.21885738763999593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390983043","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004059563,0.028329885,0.0009079203,0.05193997,0.0014508524,0.00003536426,0.00029690808,0.000041017942,0.9129385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23543371,0.013377153,0.0012557425,0.02646538,0.001346669,0.00010959823,0.00019646742,0.0001787139,0.7216366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99543566,0.00067212945,0.00007109567,0.0003993626,0.0019122616,0.0015094399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976508,0.0008084871,0.0000710579,0.00013364624,0.0010593549,0.0002767219],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024072372,0.0008305304,0.00083299767,0.0024106586,0.024592089,0.016577631,0.0026045698,0.010657442,0.019642217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074658007,0.0006407382,0.00049142336,0.005089232,0.017718056,0.0040300465,0.0018459528,0.010196981,0.0016278698],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000436507,0.000005932895,0.00006410913,0.000014657445,0.0000024118485,0.000024766221,0.0006778193,0.00008998987,0.000020429805,0.92810094,0.067683846,0.0033106531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013023172,0.0000037249863,0.00090857886,0.00025915483,0.0000137507905,0.000033255008,0.001508621,0.00026830813,0.000119484605,0.24690448,0.7499281,0.00003955402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97327244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9876084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.111421555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.111421555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1762314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80842376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390999199","doi":"10.51644/9781771122757-004","title":"Rights Inflation in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inflation (cosmology); Political science; Theoretical physics; Physics","score_opus":0.02254676550850239,"score_gpt":0.24362320053032654,"score_spread":0.22107643502182417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390999199","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039085556,0.011366889,0.0006291989,0.067461714,0.0010155912,0.00005452316,0.00078469154,0.00007412392,0.8795278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49298286,0.0057739094,0.00063871924,0.018353095,0.00041120057,0.00006422721,0.00031431817,0.00011894608,0.48134273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992695,0.00046359136,0.00011345928,0.00059043954,0.0030748586,0.003062608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971603,0.00043850238,0.00008534199,0.0001352974,0.0016622711,0.0005182845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002120647,0.00046717416,0.0008056432,0.002787017,0.024645958,0.014378328,0.0017502619,0.0049979836,0.024053026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008455612,0.00048361666,0.0005931485,0.0058477675,0.007593304,0.0025866725,0.0032005126,0.008653994,0.0012866056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022468543,0.00001581452,0.0010121736,0.00003356857,0.000011066044,0.00011208139,0.0023224377,0.0003908288,0.00005647712,0.8874981,0.0934439,0.0150812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002594203,0.000012548779,0.008257293,0.00028157595,0.000041838837,0.00008355651,0.0059469067,0.0008431141,0.00027417016,0.10830027,0.8758419,0.00009093427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99304396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9954396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8268638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17313619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2604531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9590448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391163169","doi":"10.5040/9781509957910.ch-013","title":"Election Law, Judicial Review, and Canadian Democracy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Democracy; Law; Election law; Judicial review; Politics","score_opus":0.015444772832374942,"score_gpt":0.29426365165222423,"score_spread":0.2788188788198493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391163169","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019927379,0.009727733,0.00038967267,0.066496365,0.00060799724,0.000093769355,0.0023648867,0.00013336923,0.9002589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36725503,0.0073837843,0.0007391496,0.016181543,0.0007521572,0.00013127679,0.0007443446,0.00013435571,0.60667837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957183,0.0006633485,0.00006899466,0.00024472378,0.0012448952,0.002059764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99180615,0.003517188,0.00024953578,0.00028338356,0.0030823576,0.001061337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034869139,0.00047393766,0.0005497655,0.004066498,0.022129524,0.009218272,0.0020662812,0.005331285,0.065150455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01607325,0.00030007574,0.00047167004,0.007128198,0.0067288475,0.0020245595,0.0017473982,0.0040726666,0.0027366206],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038462444,0.000063632426,0.0017586843,0.00008458297,0.000010017294,0.00010260663,0.0015401149,0.0004657086,0.000073256604,0.6743447,0.2953485,0.026169775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000693481,0.00002845367,0.023688499,0.00029690124,0.000044009932,0.000054603308,0.005500893,0.0011234091,0.00038356707,0.090656795,0.8780613,0.000092318514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9852402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9941316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07642555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07642555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.139125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5545088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391600269","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1438","title":"The Significance of R. v. Albashir in the Evolution of Constitutional Remedies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.051597291133065964,"score_gpt":0.3273445897171541,"score_spread":0.2757472985840881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391600269","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23767827,0.011154588,0.009631214,0.13482307,0.0012696139,0.00030174898,0.00026360838,0.00024439106,0.60463357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94817454,0.0016666366,0.0021712207,0.01671914,0.00025698822,0.000030806706,0.000040141145,0.00007197642,0.030868541],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97413945,0.0038034087,0.00075838587,0.0036906765,0.011234078,0.0063739563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9771985,0.010057135,0.0022275806,0.0013872043,0.0068293973,0.0023002431],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01576968,0.00033738837,0.0007651439,0.002915262,0.013776045,0.014043548,0.0027074842,0.007684113,0.0048322477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039976623,0.0006767707,0.0010628965,0.002042933,0.03037126,0.0058254004,0.004427285,0.011204552,0.00035767918],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049176342,0.000041100673,0.0035498408,0.000060166443,0.00002804459,0.000523396,0.004191963,0.0012577915,0.0009624051,0.9609567,0.005816474,0.022562934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030173897,0.0005022637,0.0835929,0.001052279,0.0005091168,0.0009810297,0.015210821,0.0064051845,0.008318371,0.31876716,0.56337714,0.0009819479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84944487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90101594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91578794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08421208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11486687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61100423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391719412","doi":"10.21991/cf29463","title":"Ford Focus","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Focus (optics); Computer science; Physics; Optics","score_opus":0.025579660216631994,"score_gpt":0.29700935626768393,"score_spread":0.27142969605105194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391719412","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011032991,0.0026040915,0.00040542532,0.020644616,0.0022952398,0.00004463778,0.0017319126,0.00015952085,0.9710113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00799857,0.0014619633,0.00024654897,0.004963328,0.0003108831,0.000024152525,0.0006055917,0.000114874696,0.9842741],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984818,0.00007613395,0.000027325983,0.00027557393,0.0006608104,0.0004783305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825853,0.00018652696,0.000042345815,0.00011226985,0.0007186367,0.0006817022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093360734,0.00053722184,0.0003685935,0.0017750291,0.009781876,0.007226812,0.0014871584,0.0030283832,0.440585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027173117,0.0003044716,0.0003497067,0.0023027598,0.0013801891,0.0022986191,0.0026533091,0.0032267512,0.11161262],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012505119,0.000011965036,0.0002999606,0.00006888969,0.0000018398074,0.00013051566,0.0005285768,0.00003203546,0.00013891092,0.12608448,0.85022664,0.022463705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.2208023e-7,8.5222547e-7,0.00015067664,0.000015969517,5.078389e-7,0.000014458729,0.00012583131,0.000005001971,0.00002331909,0.00054034794,0.9991208,0.0000014277822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47011885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6579306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47011885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023616541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030332638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391752890","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2024.2","title":"Defending Dworkin’s One-System Anti-Positivism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Legal positivism; Morality; Opposition (politics); Positivism; Jurisprudence; Epistemology; Politics; Law; Sociology; Philosophy of law; Philosophy; Law and economics; Political science; Comparative law","score_opus":0.039561452306466155,"score_gpt":0.2970963619715947,"score_spread":0.2575349096651286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391752890","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07138174,0.0020008301,0.24983506,0.20949236,0.0024560022,0.00020387571,0.00020548434,0.00023656199,0.46418813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9490131,0.0005769253,0.02779865,0.0102975145,0.0006822111,0.0001780771,0.000041809544,0.00011503872,0.011296682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886487,0.0056361617,0.0003759011,0.0020486827,0.0025013331,0.000789193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98707205,0.0064102067,0.0010262225,0.0022451708,0.0025594614,0.00068689155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014316513,0.0007165202,0.0010072436,0.0027876983,0.0051639867,0.007942043,0.0029080522,0.0047652186,0.0031991561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015998732,0.00055972586,0.00091700634,0.0013041421,0.044889938,0.009185461,0.0071879937,0.010447989,0.00065348635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007024135,0.000007170848,0.00006737998,0.000009428015,0.0000025952127,0.000016149495,0.00045731213,0.00006302086,0.000035175985,0.9977016,0.00080360606,0.0008295392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001574055,0.0000062299773,0.00007060913,0.000021931444,0.0000035551614,0.000020394005,0.00017855842,0.0006578882,0.000119613745,0.9907425,0.008156412,0.0000065331956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046118833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045953966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014316513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008414799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050568352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07571387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391757620","doi":"10.1017/9781009049450.001","title":"Introduction","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; University of Toronto; University of Oxford; Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Latin Americans; Narrative; Period (music); Perspective (graphical); Craft; Politics; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Social science; History; Genealogy; Law; Aesthetics; Literature; Art; Visual arts; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02478256825938784,"score_gpt":0.22254223332971532,"score_spread":0.19775966507032747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391757620","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00051434967,0.0038728004,0.0017393008,0.004568525,0.0034935889,0.00006823165,0.0010947153,0.00030434132,0.98434424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0043451884,0.0030834605,0.0012474112,0.002053436,0.0008346988,0.000060213788,0.0012101767,0.00021320663,0.9869522],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927956,0.00009863911,0.000036369616,0.00018573544,0.0003172301,0.00008252208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949265,0.00010471295,0.000025618612,0.00008270136,0.00020469916,0.000089662986],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048651363,0.0006669692,0.000512078,0.0010697595,0.0020214557,0.0052895844,0.0014668133,0.002224628,0.40616104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018441965,0.00025407475,0.00043345566,0.0013443315,0.0011268373,0.003761595,0.0024165255,0.0021497328,0.21084148],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027502436,0.00003450983,0.0002393564,0.00021332149,0.0000030237607,0.00012922141,0.0008475908,0.00011428625,0.00026537784,0.10677391,0.7631892,0.12816274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.1750627e-7,0.000003524676,0.00007144259,0.000059293034,4.5159973e-7,0.00004573315,0.00008494331,0.000011965529,0.000021262376,0.0025109209,0.99718803,0.0000015069843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030561674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043475493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40616104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001801744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017404293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8470392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391760035","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4694814","title":"Comparative Constitutional Law: Reflection of a Field Transformed","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional law; Law; Political science; Field (mathematics); Reflection (computer programming); Comparative law; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.032797126649491005,"score_gpt":0.3507828207633811,"score_spread":0.31798569411389005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391760035","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051824357,0.010402327,0.02536118,0.26320365,0.0014265731,0.00007620579,0.00020061091,0.00006805793,0.6474371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96620595,0.0017108042,0.0043819854,0.012332335,0.00095140166,0.00007246506,0.000056526438,0.00010424036,0.014184324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912948,0.0058710454,0.00019167311,0.0012320442,0.0008680835,0.00054234784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97447234,0.020231823,0.00068015273,0.002257323,0.0016315471,0.00072678627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019621573,0.0004354143,0.0007792068,0.005007138,0.0073999,0.013902693,0.0023889327,0.007153161,0.017083596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026577214,0.00042902012,0.0004961641,0.0041092816,0.07624754,0.023370983,0.0060178996,0.009268994,0.0005363702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033331169,0.000005212259,0.000040931565,0.000011741998,0.0000010395072,0.0000110619785,0.002733165,0.000025506626,0.000023214126,0.99469095,0.0012204553,0.0012334358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019004428,0.000013556604,0.0003975442,0.0001458792,0.000004550361,0.00005552125,0.011593013,0.00021522919,0.00014638508,0.9087256,0.078674264,0.000009413644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009981779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013651063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019621573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0124040665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008861203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10377002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391777617","doi":"10.48152/ssrp-qxvj-fz21","title":"Reproduction of 'When Do Politicians Appeal Broadly? The Economic Consequences of Electoral Rules in Brazil'","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Reproduction; Political science; Political economy; Economics; Biology; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.048713306444732575,"score_gpt":0.35275628258334407,"score_spread":0.3040429761386115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391777617","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7658904,0.0011064612,0.0005058724,0.028269105,0.00004472185,0.00004206036,0.00095332175,0.0000075325115,0.20318048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970193,0.00012424076,0.00003471706,0.0001887776,0.000009465491,0.0000051654943,0.00002804203,0.0000022499753,0.0025880851],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99684674,0.0012461265,0.00007746867,0.00025665978,0.00058400095,0.0009890635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9825382,0.011494069,0.002511605,0.0006042793,0.0019398959,0.000911916],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052189175,0.00009494043,0.00038431186,0.00095911894,0.0022259133,0.0041275835,0.00072300964,0.0011258502,0.009669736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03141438,0.00017305833,0.00025331718,0.0016296648,0.0032858476,0.0020050176,0.0014117991,0.0016759449,0.00040409665],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015659687,0.00015464661,0.12013932,0.000120880875,0.00007478371,0.00047201605,0.015046746,0.0014116977,0.00064269704,0.8225394,0.01085916,0.028382052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001058437,0.00014101145,0.7336602,0.00030396343,0.0002307053,0.0002820096,0.05114732,0.007445813,0.0011377197,0.14059319,0.0648933,0.000058907855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14435713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3098781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9947811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006047582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006539132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2870338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391796935","doi":"10.7202/1101492ar","title":"A. DE MESTRAL, S. BIRKS, M. BOTHE, I. COTLER, D. KLINCK ET A. MOREL (dir.), La limitation des droits de l’homme en droit constitutionnel comparé, Cowansville (Québec), Éditions Yvon Blais, 1986, + 593 p. (55,00$ CAN)","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02416973239511718,"score_gpt":0.28969897895224056,"score_spread":0.2655292465571234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391796935","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001292179,0.7850191,0.00082187884,0.12879299,0.012410598,0.000082237035,0.0016389372,0.000090590416,0.06985144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.034741517,0.53218216,0.0017806405,0.03407482,0.0052324003,0.00015438328,0.0013323191,0.00022683718,0.390275],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839514,0.00024145738,0.000076536824,0.00017242954,0.0008774015,0.00023699546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99659353,0.00088508386,0.00036220753,0.00006626623,0.0017427695,0.0003501725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018988558,0.001374044,0.0007181229,0.0028714887,0.005609169,0.0046784105,0.00181984,0.003783381,0.05977565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033668478,0.0007566733,0.0004929009,0.0051655937,0.002805007,0.0033922137,0.0011064358,0.004031999,0.018507754],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017317672,0.000009845119,0.0005157564,0.00025843136,0.0000069599023,0.000049933264,0.0005007872,0.000029803809,0.000089045214,0.0033964869,0.9710024,0.024123294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011310154,0.000013298751,0.008528426,0.0005051959,0.000012491983,0.00010942212,0.0013974564,0.000036708137,0.00013175698,0.0011032842,0.98812443,0.000026214917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8312335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94844496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8312335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020544756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017377056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33952075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391863192","doi":"10.51644/9780889205666","title":"“Race,” Rights and the Law in the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Race (biology); Political science; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.012274143225049283,"score_gpt":0.22954724679621058,"score_spread":0.2172731035711613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391863192","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019329123,0.025947984,0.0006202881,0.04964255,0.00095326453,0.000050917606,0.00021051131,0.000034439043,0.903211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60191095,0.020212714,0.001000918,0.019058282,0.00064755895,0.00008169367,0.00019802297,0.00006234939,0.3568275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99776614,0.00027950073,0.000039915984,0.00016220781,0.00091575563,0.0008364125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99791855,0.00080543366,0.000072336516,0.00007200415,0.0008600432,0.00027158874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013353634,0.00035596898,0.00034571846,0.0017229157,0.029134141,0.01044895,0.0016457652,0.003777785,0.004815437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005070656,0.00036280532,0.00024762354,0.0032990794,0.02039004,0.0026471235,0.001490676,0.0048841448,0.00038570864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000456336,0.000007804797,0.00033764503,0.000024039411,0.0000023348853,0.00010691842,0.0039732703,0.00019228146,0.00004947808,0.9290237,0.06048824,0.0057898774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014319472,0.000008844613,0.004167762,0.0004091606,0.000020192074,0.00009642511,0.010153741,0.00062723807,0.00018786965,0.13566227,0.8486067,0.00004557598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9850138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99284947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1110233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1110233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.161746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8055342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391869898","doi":"10.3138/9781487514662-006","title":"4. The Supreme Federal Court of Brazil: Protecting Democracy and Centralized Power","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill-Queen's University Press","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Democracy; Power (physics); Law and economics; Sociology; Physics; Politics","score_opus":0.027530345234883777,"score_gpt":0.2558128227021419,"score_spread":0.2282824774672581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391869898","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0069985148,0.03477274,0.0016965366,0.059199914,0.0008326391,0.0000509518,0.00037591418,0.000048929265,0.896024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41292283,0.01839536,0.0018397154,0.023344506,0.0010686178,0.00014759989,0.00020478843,0.00014737708,0.54192924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930537,0.00018080967,0.000021824822,0.00008911735,0.00018288378,0.00022002868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948126,0.00025781835,0.00003926668,0.000053926444,0.00012354639,0.000044110675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088475674,0.00062252325,0.00036448424,0.0012113053,0.006742077,0.004836453,0.0007933763,0.0064252494,0.011679418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024381205,0.00041541198,0.00040055436,0.0018825219,0.0060681077,0.0030119866,0.0014013649,0.00390349,0.0010572738],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023313403,0.0000029977882,0.00006340568,0.00002660346,0.0000013523578,0.00003489247,0.001282159,0.000056723962,0.000047921727,0.97030556,0.025063315,0.0031125715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015588595,0.000008209709,0.0018512675,0.0004134999,0.000024337189,0.00008532682,0.0014394803,0.00021309592,0.0003612288,0.3104851,0.68508315,0.000019746842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33327672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.66030574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33327672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012493059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013123748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66267365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391915596","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjae004","title":"<i>Rethinking Decentralization: Mapping the Meaning of Subsidiarity in Federal Political Culture</i>, by Jacob Deem","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Decentralization; Meaning (existential); Politics; Political science; Public administration; Political culture; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.04500437366301309,"score_gpt":0.2957533105465377,"score_spread":0.2507489368835246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391915596","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11846971,0.02619099,0.009445594,0.63025904,0.0028312388,0.000024797631,0.0004608402,0.00010827298,0.21220952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9570157,0.008109616,0.0026324329,0.016432814,0.0011513131,0.000041597687,0.00016299344,0.00018512606,0.014268352],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812466,0.0012128184,0.000040570278,0.00021090312,0.00022847166,0.000182605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953629,0.0033772418,0.000426211,0.00025878183,0.00036387853,0.00021089641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002149609,0.00030650158,0.00028842076,0.0013338551,0.0058322446,0.010136117,0.0008556141,0.0015459197,0.0037906454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00892019,0.00023648213,0.00031923098,0.0048393914,0.018958488,0.0096429605,0.0029003723,0.004766261,0.00038954278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030950272,0.000022984543,0.005248413,0.00011154786,0.000018153336,0.000049760423,0.05707696,0.00030571912,0.00025305376,0.8219427,0.07816252,0.036777236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009624371,0.000014641081,0.025997123,0.0006668986,0.000021315593,0.00011086065,0.100854345,0.0009300813,0.00066974445,0.5285194,0.34216475,0.00004119466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039370492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08327095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039370492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005856215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005829536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078282654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392165691","doi":"10.30958/ajphil.3-1-3","title":"Jurisprudence: The Study of the Rule of Law in a Republic","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ATHENS JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Burman University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Rule of law; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.049265745483881185,"score_gpt":0.3327839149457431,"score_spread":0.2835181694618619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392165691","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024640298,0.046459742,0.04303923,0.1078204,0.0021287836,0.00010155194,0.000108281114,0.000051440762,0.77565026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9239838,0.012645346,0.012320252,0.015245674,0.0033937853,0.0002774253,0.00008617749,0.00012666969,0.03192083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99195963,0.0052172635,0.00024746198,0.0008044049,0.0012085324,0.0005626037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99120975,0.0071633602,0.00039438988,0.0004659112,0.0004694597,0.00029715776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01037284,0.0004905926,0.0009450746,0.0021832648,0.009904458,0.0102011785,0.002175999,0.00709744,0.0026166404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011323856,0.0005228743,0.0008723214,0.0022794812,0.06397413,0.012687382,0.0049967407,0.01286514,0.00057210715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001164967,0.0000037593911,0.000030285682,0.000007756932,0.0000010391554,0.000025932623,0.0015528875,0.000072422874,0.000013544609,0.99712914,0.00058336277,0.0005786486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057213015,0.0000065098548,0.00006917948,0.0000684272,0.0000019691804,0.000039646915,0.0007550505,0.0002562028,0.00002495899,0.959672,0.039095335,0.0000049352698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009017928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004880788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01037284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009808506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058626086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07116604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392970856","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192898579.013.23","title":"Agendas, Decisions, and Autonomy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Government (linguistics); Autonomy; Discretion; Credibility; Law; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.04565380966231196,"score_gpt":0.24914182698485032,"score_spread":0.20348801732253835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392970856","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025768666,0.0049331742,0.0061822725,0.011551983,0.00016895188,0.00001961502,0.00004617452,0.000028854574,0.9513003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9022894,0.002945524,0.0018999359,0.0013007724,0.00023138509,0.000046552384,0.000052675052,0.000035788355,0.0911981],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997738,0.0013685789,0.000049299368,0.00022797818,0.00045450436,0.00016174123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997811,0.0015526281,0.00013151095,0.00015419401,0.00018223071,0.00016840154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021398112,0.0002034293,0.00018096493,0.0008407103,0.0022678152,0.0059854886,0.0004993587,0.0009468555,0.007308245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025924041,0.00015363563,0.00012781317,0.0007507961,0.019643452,0.0025567915,0.0022096867,0.0019336058,0.0006342137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002595877,0.0000061498954,0.00016869092,0.000012510313,8.520742e-7,0.00001840794,0.003537634,0.00016470952,0.00008707771,0.98777443,0.0026569199,0.005570139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008980572,0.000013055457,0.0013878351,0.0001611094,0.0000031276586,0.000027150394,0.0045468924,0.00051992,0.0002229123,0.7585635,0.23453648,0.000009156266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041837613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060101924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007308245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037702178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002782883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027354956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393015592","doi":"10.1515/9780791485842-012","title":"For the Love of Justice? Judicial Review in Canada and the United States","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"SUNY Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.059164669670302664,"score_gpt":0.2873727495401552,"score_spread":0.22820807986985253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393015592","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022737417,0.14968288,0.0007290733,0.33415258,0.003221352,0.00009764107,0.00038900637,0.00007153438,0.48891854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5222002,0.059544396,0.0010735088,0.08013384,0.0023996078,0.00014180406,0.00018653771,0.00014666989,0.33417344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98311126,0.0028499656,0.00034291475,0.00093474006,0.006578678,0.006182448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9839586,0.005419839,0.0005670709,0.00029824456,0.00669115,0.0030650594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00753638,0.0006254421,0.0011458233,0.0040793796,0.037531238,0.02436,0.0030432034,0.013396461,0.008332215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027664615,0.0008236662,0.0005082987,0.008571798,0.021240927,0.0046235607,0.0027367675,0.011302783,0.00078486075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029291401,0.00004164577,0.0011654292,0.000097047574,0.000021866455,0.0002514954,0.006143218,0.00046354835,0.0000930829,0.6975486,0.26869154,0.025453264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004099636,0.00002427319,0.011150817,0.0009692351,0.00005382008,0.00010813428,0.012665415,0.0007417523,0.00018763692,0.1086444,0.8652667,0.00014686555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98849213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99599516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17317744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17317744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.40462443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95899695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393015936","doi":"10.1515/9780791485842","title":"Constitutional Politics in Canada and the United States","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"SUNY Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03512824171952666,"score_gpt":0.258304286262496,"score_spread":0.22317604454296935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393015936","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039002392,0.04662395,0.0007446236,0.06909546,0.0009100881,0.000051562754,0.00054482865,0.00006256481,0.84296453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66281235,0.020289203,0.00085717643,0.015243918,0.00053494575,0.00007980811,0.00025780033,0.00012116015,0.29980367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99528486,0.0006405736,0.000067452886,0.00028144772,0.0016116494,0.0021139756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969903,0.0009588555,0.00010127155,0.00009319382,0.001166542,0.00068982114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022200255,0.00051384384,0.0008236192,0.0036543524,0.03431468,0.019459467,0.002248289,0.0055011786,0.010897983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077975327,0.0005897356,0.00045239844,0.009172564,0.022005863,0.0027398432,0.0022363714,0.006701365,0.00054172106],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013420444,0.000018169361,0.00059577654,0.000028521106,0.0000082261195,0.00009249418,0.0041212034,0.00044734965,0.000051323943,0.9262952,0.056878768,0.011449503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029102577,0.000013550913,0.013265828,0.0005284796,0.00004213413,0.000060073027,0.018916082,0.0008025496,0.00018282466,0.16256192,0.80351126,0.00008622504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99477935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99800676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20389344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20389344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28400534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9233708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393378489","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-90434-0_72-1","title":"Judicialisation of Public Policy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.08421998865131865,"score_gpt":0.32866772545684914,"score_spread":0.2444477368055305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393378489","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018316844,0.003568724,0.004557323,0.015169262,0.00054483634,0.000034729786,0.000050932525,0.000030045176,0.9742125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35450825,0.005144165,0.003491045,0.013742981,0.002911851,0.00036088683,0.00012951912,0.00017937177,0.61953187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929073,0.003376792,0.00015605582,0.00084568025,0.0018601594,0.0008540001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99543744,0.002994404,0.00016287885,0.00076380523,0.00052506255,0.0001163824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069549372,0.00055213383,0.0009242997,0.0017986798,0.0063253157,0.012281718,0.0021860786,0.008655573,0.016422477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0160219,0.00067632255,0.0005227836,0.0019759235,0.022818532,0.006779463,0.003195053,0.0111226365,0.0024163418],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.709536e-7,0.000003473458,0.0000035109247,0.0000037890386,4.528068e-7,0.00000408836,0.00013566682,0.000033487948,0.000008073882,0.9952964,0.0036573408,0.0008531181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059339354,0.000004489082,0.000087286906,0.000062726605,0.0000024607925,0.0000148013405,0.00021354714,0.00024797596,0.00010422454,0.8747576,0.124493435,0.0000054703837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013241575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018640948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016422477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009890748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009741443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07176274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393905308","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4746964","title":"The Judicialisation of Parliamentary Privilege in Canada: A Cautionary Tale","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Privilege (computing); Law","score_opus":0.009926968661262192,"score_gpt":0.251231844322779,"score_spread":0.24130487566151682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393905308","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15151519,0.021489792,0.0022657441,0.62462693,0.0014697826,0.00011134678,0.0011993338,0.00008891556,0.19723296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9041899,0.006692725,0.0011038784,0.05146656,0.0005883417,0.000048219215,0.00014633262,0.00010107765,0.035663057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9802899,0.0024839605,0.00051518896,0.0015547549,0.005306514,0.009849673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9731303,0.009435864,0.0014730059,0.00085825624,0.011079658,0.0040228995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01009586,0.00047394307,0.0016151959,0.003552877,0.029458407,0.016660875,0.004809417,0.010302158,0.010717463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042959698,0.0007338176,0.0008813415,0.00748607,0.018740932,0.0063810064,0.0042355414,0.018409267,0.00042466147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011106078,0.00006644543,0.010418798,0.00020406875,0.00012514998,0.0003480776,0.016917298,0.0009616153,0.00025529743,0.83491284,0.106739484,0.028939834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002364586,0.00012747411,0.11316988,0.0018851918,0.00038146382,0.00033395464,0.0898647,0.0037788393,0.0014396993,0.16962284,0.6183954,0.0007640956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9978781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99903935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1707924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1707924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35932264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96176326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394002624","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4748491","title":"International Judicial Habitus: Pierre Bourdieu and the Cognitive Turn","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Habitus; Sociology; Cognition; Epistemology; Psychology; Social science; Philosophy; Cultural capital","score_opus":0.008827501694022648,"score_gpt":0.2928510759687322,"score_spread":0.2840235742747096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394002624","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0750911,0.007823835,0.0066234567,0.11133446,0.00039506363,0.000012597361,0.000051296967,0.000050741866,0.7986175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878209,0.0011921969,0.00080152054,0.0021064528,0.0003897815,0.000014558827,0.000008378814,0.0000333307,0.00763277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976834,0.001317075,0.00003120878,0.00031189097,0.00031202304,0.0003443358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927878,0.0057428884,0.00034515973,0.0003474247,0.000444812,0.00033201565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040310323,0.0004213935,0.00042325506,0.0023906503,0.005664674,0.009818,0.0009979527,0.0045701293,0.0064770784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010618828,0.00033732114,0.00032504855,0.002449954,0.036748834,0.010175113,0.002772758,0.0054960703,0.00049770094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069363196,0.000008178043,0.00010323093,0.000004917982,0.000001869267,0.000030173218,0.0023529804,0.000092609414,0.000012438943,0.9946037,0.0014571515,0.0013258592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008251155,0.0000028112636,0.0002675804,0.000023483017,0.0000019307918,0.000027135273,0.0013952764,0.00017937314,0.00003795513,0.9868663,0.011183629,0.0000062501244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009214871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007866399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052775526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002798279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038291574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394701323","doi":"10.25071/a08pgg98","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada in 1999: The year in review","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada Watch","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01394882161947168,"score_gpt":0.24103654938086647,"score_spread":0.2270877277613948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394701323","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054316157,0.7130501,0.00024341335,0.22545807,0.014466679,0.00006360138,0.0020284506,0.000049844515,0.039208263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18488868,0.61920995,0.0011892339,0.13632506,0.011481452,0.00010808371,0.0018883914,0.00013619622,0.04477299],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884969,0.0007274357,0.00048915454,0.00070183177,0.007290094,0.0022946827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9516476,0.0060788738,0.0021000656,0.0005543956,0.03580453,0.0038145063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009064828,0.00070072885,0.0017172784,0.010693102,0.011737242,0.01793058,0.0036322502,0.010310023,0.004222072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033264488,0.00084199256,0.0008228708,0.026969125,0.007984965,0.0041664145,0.0017171378,0.0077110585,0.00048730613],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056486675,0.000028905433,0.0025554684,0.0012973099,0.00010528713,0.00014851165,0.0009514372,0.00029349444,0.00015441237,0.06328693,0.8775118,0.053609993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021140391,0.000009965768,0.01490498,0.0029415425,0.00013385586,0.000043828015,0.0014630456,0.00012806842,0.00018820888,0.0039915023,0.9761209,0.000052994896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98617584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99465984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18866543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18866543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.41987622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9410331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394701515","doi":"10.25071/knwxgs81","title":"Judicial activism and the Constitution","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada Watch","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Judicial activism; Political science; Law; Judicial review","score_opus":0.010164902908540857,"score_gpt":0.23038024832909915,"score_spread":0.2202153454205583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394701515","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049840357,0.0067534493,0.0008136486,0.06132896,0.00017486028,0.000025265548,0.000048811235,0.000010880182,0.8810038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95981574,0.0027944136,0.00019095858,0.0045073153,0.00028442382,0.000024195835,0.000030191914,0.000011964416,0.03234073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948607,0.0018348708,0.000071274895,0.0004364795,0.0010757545,0.001720866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953917,0.002618766,0.00059916946,0.00023117957,0.0005884861,0.00057077076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035864061,0.00014703727,0.00022209444,0.0012466937,0.009955261,0.009600975,0.0008136178,0.0034601188,0.007415765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008139929,0.0001748977,0.00015711458,0.0016585799,0.0289842,0.0021889294,0.0028176312,0.004253436,0.00040402],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005643496,0.000008298924,0.0005190861,0.000013594568,0.0000019455213,0.00004762856,0.0042282613,0.00005630393,0.00006670894,0.98584557,0.00564779,0.003559154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052166433,0.00002223737,0.012577154,0.00041345536,0.000019474106,0.00009656333,0.015452501,0.00041709133,0.00042459165,0.314075,0.65642756,0.000022244667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3480226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4888602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3480226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026100183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02664353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6919938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394757774","doi":"10.1111/jels.12380","title":"Rankings without U.S. News: A revealed preference approach to evaluating law schools","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; Andrew W. Mellon Foundation","keywords":"Preference; Ranking (information retrieval); CLARITY; Legal education; Scope (computer science); Psychology; Mathematics education; Political science; Law; Sociology; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.258648525459174,"score_gpt":0.4668240924227282,"score_spread":0.20817556696355421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394757774","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7194782,0.0009033666,0.24607898,0.0030355342,0.00012653499,0.0008510674,0.0044529852,0.00023937359,0.024833946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97364444,0.0001349844,0.024159864,0.000112399706,0.00005766319,0.00017496054,0.0006053921,0.000015762977,0.0010943626],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9591611,0.033057943,0.0012551111,0.0023427594,0.0028029212,0.0013800929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9235396,0.058424227,0.008359444,0.0033853054,0.004303767,0.0019875995],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01523913,0.00097272696,0.0018836581,0.008053389,0.0017096805,0.007606196,0.0019384965,0.00163443,0.0050259903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060072247,0.0007442421,0.0016296322,0.009897386,0.0025856614,0.004997502,0.0019294389,0.0026189513,0.00059411203],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024224499,0.0016100487,0.31826174,0.00075791683,0.0022128122,0.0014783228,0.0038933167,0.25989747,0.0014059287,0.27271277,0.0115130115,0.12383432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014242245,0.0010989271,0.042335913,0.00010592612,0.00030991182,0.0001954715,0.0050363126,0.7995206,0.00082720263,0.14590219,0.004242435,0.00028269464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022984976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029123697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9847609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006144501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027671417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08059323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394828478","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4780291","title":"Tribunals in Canada: A Coming of Age","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Computer science; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Political science; Computer security","score_opus":0.015848611737089863,"score_gpt":0.27670072282188957,"score_spread":0.2608521110847997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394828478","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37808552,0.038042232,0.0013120127,0.36373445,0.0017585591,0.0001341945,0.0014528917,0.00015785474,0.21532221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90699166,0.007908778,0.00069252664,0.022650458,0.00021733601,0.00003602482,0.00023831704,0.00009670318,0.061168183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98676234,0.0011062236,0.00025095692,0.0007974489,0.0029105975,0.0081725335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98347837,0.00230955,0.0009390883,0.00030148204,0.0066836313,0.0062879547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004599213,0.00043092665,0.0013941727,0.004418865,0.043519903,0.022608455,0.0049731154,0.008639202,0.024295775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018362323,0.0007767569,0.00062654045,0.012955969,0.015158643,0.0056982,0.0066067935,0.010940464,0.0010107033],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001637501,0.00020895447,0.04216867,0.00044296726,0.00011088449,0.0012624898,0.053833645,0.0009884008,0.00046620582,0.56935364,0.21271096,0.118289426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007210644,0.00006185975,0.10657843,0.0010153778,0.00010509149,0.0002456521,0.1734242,0.0012249319,0.0004124192,0.028244857,0.6883432,0.000271917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99790645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9993838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73712164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.26287836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4284763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8549566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395030879","doi":"10.29173/alr2721","title":"The Federal Court of Appeal and the Federal Court: 50 Years of History, Martine Valois, Ian Greene, Craig Forcese &amp; Peter McCormick, eds. (Toronto: Irwin Law, 2021)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Federal court; Political science; Supreme court","score_opus":0.01906055500878211,"score_gpt":0.2724870684572662,"score_spread":0.2534265134484841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395030879","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001525434,0.8179078,0.00038158536,0.10114125,0.0023210102,0.00000937433,0.00014988947,0.000028378116,0.07653531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24863455,0.5899665,0.001570958,0.05060005,0.008008284,0.00007638956,0.00040528347,0.00011485467,0.10062317],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914547,0.0026752148,0.00028592214,0.0006151284,0.0031097368,0.0018593381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994021,0.0032024577,0.0004606034,0.00027546354,0.0013525253,0.0006879776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069044563,0.0006643976,0.00078820693,0.0061563924,0.013557711,0.016817966,0.002352313,0.011852456,0.010500941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017794086,0.0012880156,0.00063081016,0.008997194,0.024019765,0.008095572,0.0033162832,0.006716118,0.0018759767],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024600226,0.00003173772,0.0008193853,0.00018534486,0.000018384297,0.00017011241,0.0021106584,0.0002897052,0.000048975813,0.43907842,0.4863243,0.070898354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010898622,0.00000848737,0.0052514807,0.0018195953,0.000019970492,0.00013923559,0.0026042126,0.00013224052,0.000061645114,0.113048956,0.87686443,0.00003882047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6224187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8339611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3775813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.068289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.069233924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7596099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395031272","doi":"10.29173/alr2755","title":"Bruce Ziff's Legal History","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.050778602036031496,"score_gpt":0.3156489605181829,"score_spread":0.2648703584821514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395031272","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017196927,0.5035584,0.0007091108,0.31174833,0.009863571,0.000021695023,0.00018243457,0.000031294596,0.1721655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1107544,0.5044729,0.0018399385,0.11225875,0.00759651,0.000066849316,0.00027626424,0.00009353643,0.26264083],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99647504,0.00067814393,0.00010072234,0.0003220067,0.0019550633,0.00046900962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99381435,0.0021998144,0.000196006,0.00015584842,0.002880339,0.0007537566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002394364,0.00032510032,0.00040297298,0.004380128,0.009483567,0.0061499337,0.0008234376,0.002904965,0.0060163117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008055942,0.00027740502,0.00018588018,0.0049129156,0.008316357,0.00303815,0.0014631002,0.00418398,0.0012997524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009026257,0.000006457275,0.00042791042,0.00013663775,0.0000043547675,0.00009132713,0.0017826227,0.000072531715,0.00007464246,0.14935678,0.81617075,0.03186687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.17155e-7,0.0000013637369,0.0003988443,0.0002533206,0.0000013724447,0.000035947112,0.00035896277,0.000010216886,0.000015966394,0.0044953143,0.994423,0.0000047141925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68618804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7542581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68618804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033034395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046596903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6313201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395042680","doi":"10.21991/cf29472","title":"Comparative Constitutional Design: Northern Stagnation, Southern Innovation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic stagnation; Geography; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.06425865409382112,"score_gpt":0.3219219051417255,"score_spread":0.25766325104790433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395042680","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.077075236,0.013029239,0.04283296,0.0593837,0.00058148155,0.00004934195,0.00010320323,0.00015825922,0.8067866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9707954,0.0021499833,0.0064688055,0.0024463509,0.00027008817,0.000076182965,0.000049661925,0.00008505319,0.017658493],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99185854,0.0056871334,0.00014046235,0.0010725666,0.0008919203,0.0003494179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99444455,0.0034601858,0.00032568382,0.001109677,0.00043812883,0.00022186206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014441844,0.00022681877,0.00070962444,0.0015478248,0.0058622058,0.009248003,0.0008882724,0.0017458709,0.009124184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012640086,0.00019755782,0.00027940533,0.0020616504,0.029561518,0.0077109123,0.004323998,0.0030003379,0.00051166036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034189773,0.0000019006693,0.00010722328,0.000015472573,0.0000010734707,0.000007771955,0.0014572431,0.000055691136,0.00003968487,0.99310136,0.0005650054,0.004644059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011028763,0.000023409113,0.0008654379,0.00012730827,0.000008417955,0.000063087,0.00271206,0.0004054385,0.0003426618,0.8697227,0.12571174,0.000006668136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032540516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055788485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014441844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008055884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055018645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07637668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395048310","doi":"10.21991/cf29467","title":"Editorial Introduction","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science","score_opus":0.015231513895649548,"score_gpt":0.281960348890499,"score_spread":0.26672883499484945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395048310","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000052676285,0.0012720885,0.00014865235,0.018972302,0.96888757,0.000040475337,0.00020382881,0.00014370459,0.010278688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00096922636,0.002474409,0.00024354007,0.020944443,0.9180154,0.000078101235,0.00030174194,0.0002485394,0.056724504],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99475586,0.0006039724,0.00047771342,0.0009105324,0.0027137126,0.00053834426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97563666,0.00418715,0.0015958635,0.0010354586,0.013738854,0.003806017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004835228,0.0023939721,0.0016388594,0.0041477205,0.0037989588,0.008687083,0.0023368562,0.006062985,0.14788625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02820352,0.00072723284,0.0016070909,0.001525724,0.0012393107,0.0037824558,0.0025317133,0.008199523,0.07792455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013829723,0.0000054905904,0.000021289577,0.00008014942,0.0000023107377,0.000035132023,0.000010952509,0.000011310453,0.000036995436,0.00025109918,0.9942145,0.0053170393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011975351,0.000016864695,0.000144286,0.00017366742,0.0000054053844,0.00005475758,0.00004144616,0.000039149192,0.000061924206,0.000540441,0.9989008,0.000009227299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001004467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023215262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14788625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002437892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038846775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4947288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395089460","doi":"10.1017/9781009473194.027","title":"Illiberal Constitutionalism and the Abuse of Constitutional Identity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Identity (music); Political science; Criminology; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Democracy; Aesthetics; Politics","score_opus":0.025110150691679982,"score_gpt":0.23493059706896396,"score_spread":0.20982044637728398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395089460","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042282946,0.009903649,0.009412042,0.01651504,0.00029551284,0.000018844219,0.00002550211,0.000031266405,0.92151517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9672037,0.0021758075,0.0009974681,0.0018712921,0.00019249506,0.00003114152,0.000016290349,0.000028082688,0.027483717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930275,0.003958601,0.00018316339,0.00066044077,0.0013798309,0.00079045276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99774665,0.0013032547,0.00022833853,0.0003506027,0.0002429089,0.00012822122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048930845,0.0002655838,0.0003921603,0.001246464,0.0058608972,0.00878769,0.0007331333,0.0021156943,0.0027769764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063539958,0.00025610017,0.00022243481,0.0016105168,0.051045954,0.006922311,0.0053929556,0.0053740875,0.00034218788],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.0838666e-7,0.0000010386882,0.000016638438,0.000002383945,2.697573e-7,0.0000055391606,0.0005986337,0.000012806073,0.0000084730445,0.9985979,0.00018020878,0.0005752805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009099733,0.000009814566,0.0003174004,0.000073761104,0.0000036958045,0.000051788895,0.0017159991,0.00019507868,0.00014991131,0.9134675,0.083998956,0.0000069629286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005072781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005245346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00878769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076543447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048734285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05553639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395089461","doi":"10.1017/9781009473194.031","title":"Contrariness and Contradiction in Constitutional Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Contradiction; Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02602890849236177,"score_gpt":0.22179903440866924,"score_spread":0.19577012591630746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395089461","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07236705,0.010084618,0.033802684,0.033046335,0.00044266964,0.000041853305,0.00004922099,0.00008164735,0.85008395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97795415,0.0016540205,0.003871186,0.0025005008,0.00021227809,0.0000684503,0.000026364483,0.000039525086,0.013673536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898033,0.006165947,0.00036561998,0.0011800259,0.0017596389,0.0007254103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929,0.005158185,0.00044986993,0.00097608904,0.00037369796,0.00014209808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00773152,0.00029042267,0.0004877281,0.0022211114,0.0073085288,0.008566884,0.0012710147,0.003037048,0.0028415949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01529058,0.00033663123,0.00041336752,0.0023892827,0.05742744,0.009459379,0.0059599243,0.004893194,0.00038583548],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.9877157e-7,9.554557e-7,0.000026876922,0.0000036508452,5.1479014e-7,0.000009502764,0.0010833238,0.000026980853,0.000010687955,0.9979983,0.00020374465,0.0006346521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050625767,0.0000037455054,0.00012629217,0.0000443702,0.0000024862984,0.00003623114,0.0012189012,0.00023079614,0.000073200914,0.96649474,0.031759597,0.0000045820134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053065266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033961425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008566884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060395934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003496585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0438205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395089491","doi":"10.1017/9781009473194.025","title":"Constitution Making and Disharmonic Identity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Identity (music); Political science; Law; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.04120097028812875,"score_gpt":0.2593023104116443,"score_spread":0.21810134012351556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395089491","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041349206,0.004412362,0.010993192,0.006121093,0.0002656993,0.000032958338,0.00001990268,0.000037457976,0.93676805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9454207,0.0014992509,0.002039334,0.0007602636,0.00009251912,0.000039327224,0.00002636156,0.000030018033,0.050092198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997981,0.0011498883,0.000048548074,0.00018647368,0.0004142275,0.00021986682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931,0.00043166007,0.000054993267,0.00009929525,0.000065313216,0.000038730544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016883333,0.00025450072,0.00022049513,0.00096977735,0.004681809,0.0043408135,0.0006404525,0.0010300389,0.0043759914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022025388,0.00013630564,0.0001618872,0.0009498165,0.028942557,0.0038069815,0.002457826,0.0022836232,0.00044665457],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.3200115e-7,0.0000015457144,0.000016195374,0.0000037450143,2.3686017e-7,0.000008103855,0.0017635518,0.00003454087,0.000022817256,0.99674916,0.00028633352,0.0011129973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008041364,0.000018693307,0.0003457436,0.00008669322,0.0000041139783,0.000101768805,0.005681166,0.00036379215,0.00045668636,0.7697079,0.22321407,0.000011301812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002605923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003263361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049437736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049437736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002076394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035869777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395089511","doi":"10.1017/9781009473194.032","title":"Conclusion","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.030950300917694233,"score_gpt":0.236994376506559,"score_spread":0.20604407558886476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395089511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0052771107,0.0032931438,0.008685128,0.079326965,0.006039207,0.00014761549,0.0013116471,0.00032198,0.8955972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.119786575,0.004812931,0.009368907,0.05327891,0.0018938757,0.00026997286,0.0030066671,0.00043770677,0.80714446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976453,0.00043866923,0.00008986965,0.0006256034,0.0008092799,0.000391147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99789315,0.00035726328,0.00008750551,0.00025609994,0.0010702256,0.00033574217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023713873,0.0004997165,0.00035206418,0.0011573496,0.0034337167,0.0064418186,0.0017001785,0.0031080155,0.14516464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007216901,0.00016537108,0.00057554187,0.0010523114,0.0017334644,0.0040348186,0.0034613719,0.003141856,0.044345945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060273276,0.000036929025,0.0015732405,0.00022063604,0.000009224107,0.00021488099,0.0031377086,0.00022944988,0.0003027035,0.60906357,0.30902344,0.076127924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048228117,0.000008956995,0.0006573649,0.00020449252,0.0000034883776,0.000065041,0.0019519614,0.00008659129,0.00019637142,0.038706288,0.9581083,0.000006380194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006327009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008929389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14516464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045067947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048841652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395675405","doi":"10.3390/laws13030026","title":"The Judicialisation of Parliamentary Privilege in Canada: A Cautionary Tale","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); History; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.017299184228529017,"score_gpt":0.2631128698595633,"score_spread":0.24581368563103426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395675405","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01213354,0.077473566,0.0039188354,0.7540478,0.0066949828,0.00010387128,0.0006166281,0.00016273161,0.14484806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4006751,0.07101701,0.00991873,0.4211876,0.005915806,0.00018782094,0.00035753238,0.0003719362,0.09036852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98022723,0.0029500562,0.0007666493,0.0022362594,0.009270355,0.004549446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97016174,0.011065607,0.0007957816,0.0010749444,0.014888165,0.0020137625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013056418,0.00077716826,0.0014760843,0.0038265332,0.02925932,0.017038392,0.00587221,0.012214281,0.0040404103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044027563,0.0008263289,0.0013206683,0.004862791,0.02195156,0.006757649,0.0037793147,0.02150356,0.00072161434],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006797261,0.000034936915,0.0026766213,0.00034759878,0.00008537546,0.0007327189,0.009541335,0.00067600753,0.000334765,0.6819728,0.26538515,0.038144592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009177778,0.00003522077,0.009344315,0.0016628623,0.00016180261,0.00031135938,0.0062913485,0.0015177694,0.0006603332,0.10295556,0.8766406,0.00032713218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9920838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9949621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15270892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15270892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26747128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98273754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396585879","doi":"10.1007/978-3-662-68577-8_6","title":"Wie und warum zitieren Gerichte? Eine empirische Untersuchung am Beispiel des Bundesverfassungsgerichts und des Supreme Court of Canada","year":2024,"lang":"de","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Literatur und Recht","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.029990077939260434,"score_gpt":0.2856431244796622,"score_spread":0.2556530465404018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396585879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07857381,0.011961335,0.0031292706,0.06155899,0.00019269124,0.000072319264,0.00097262824,0.000033490785,0.84350556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94903183,0.0036170597,0.0006384998,0.003456454,0.000102310114,0.00003187473,0.00015665339,0.000050721905,0.04291463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99505854,0.0011739774,0.00006780934,0.0006125909,0.0011078015,0.0019792959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99646395,0.001957566,0.0002639315,0.00021921293,0.00081364415,0.00028166937],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031817604,0.0004465539,0.000746767,0.002731759,0.015585945,0.01731006,0.0020273784,0.004169726,0.015271206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010803691,0.0005066545,0.00039402608,0.0072145956,0.027547449,0.006968067,0.002512963,0.0046744333,0.0007081787],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009627056,0.00000859165,0.0009938763,0.000021927664,0.000008653066,0.00004101353,0.0036898507,0.00024224642,0.000025565356,0.985305,0.0066225133,0.003031156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004711998,0.000010907324,0.012078703,0.00038676144,0.000094706156,0.00006770145,0.037436623,0.0012973879,0.0003160303,0.68111724,0.26710153,0.00004531683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94103813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9606106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99726826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06995221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.062513635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5075412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396602654","doi":"10.2307/jj.14491577.13","title":"Diversity and Judicial Independence in Quebec and Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Wales Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Diversity (politics); Political science; Judicial independence; Law; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.027060596265683592,"score_gpt":0.20015368899212296,"score_spread":0.17309309272643936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396602654","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30845335,0.038731836,0.0008930291,0.066010356,0.0006787402,0.00010327973,0.0014704904,0.000078273566,0.58358073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82703733,0.005257349,0.0005069895,0.004859365,0.00011133757,0.000049227685,0.00020313171,0.00004519433,0.16193011],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945767,0.0007061167,0.00012513773,0.0004082894,0.0013726202,0.0028111865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99323905,0.002000652,0.0003751842,0.0002088786,0.0023102297,0.0018659291],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031229968,0.00039658387,0.0008836599,0.0036645911,0.036998633,0.016140146,0.0025456937,0.004086416,0.016417941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008010221,0.00069784484,0.0005977514,0.0088192625,0.012319042,0.0024351429,0.0032224548,0.006252105,0.00045598412],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000123977,0.00009315711,0.011431655,0.00016925974,0.00007459659,0.00081725465,0.033186797,0.0018834972,0.00036305358,0.81794685,0.089323714,0.044586163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001297552,0.00006272846,0.12951224,0.0010184374,0.00011707177,0.00022092489,0.046368152,0.001840694,0.0003827039,0.039929356,0.78015196,0.00026603846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9981755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79549146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20450851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24036661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9226574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396686680","doi":"10.29173/mlj1260","title":"Justice Côté in 2019: Great Dissenter, Voice of the Court, or Both?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Dissent; Supreme court; Majority opinion; Economic Justice; Law; Concurring opinion; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Court of record; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.04591240389080571,"score_gpt":0.3137131427960023,"score_spread":0.2678007389051966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396686680","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8551796,0.003940597,0.0005171922,0.054075047,0.0011248451,0.000054640164,0.0005908213,0.000016071104,0.08450116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888271,0.000579882,0.00015032453,0.0038621782,0.00016179198,0.000015299973,0.000108866225,0.000012576991,0.0062819477],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870978,0.002166018,0.0004208057,0.0012174037,0.006286719,0.0028112568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9757815,0.008213028,0.0044876076,0.0006539513,0.005591403,0.0052725472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008224293,0.00021448529,0.00048318307,0.002627391,0.012727548,0.008315291,0.0012201216,0.0020323542,0.004043113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04486296,0.00020665937,0.00016958902,0.004236344,0.0069974144,0.004324754,0.0034578042,0.0038187925,0.0004640195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025804006,0.00011588362,0.31938952,0.0002811243,0.00007602457,0.0037573536,0.43050307,0.00020219116,0.0013135136,0.09485593,0.06281346,0.08643389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009366892,0.000050452614,0.3012263,0.0005380822,0.000024419147,0.00079321343,0.5142446,0.00018182247,0.00084045524,0.007710701,0.17424402,0.00013659007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4562052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6586031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5437948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017703075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016767375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90709955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396686901","doi":"10.29173/mlj1314","title":"Canada’s Amendment Rules: A Window into the Soul of a Constitution","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Soul; Amendment; Window (computing); Law; Political science; First amendment; Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science; Supreme court","score_opus":0.02809546596058099,"score_gpt":0.27053175619625275,"score_spread":0.24243629023567176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396686901","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049407445,0.00974218,0.0040755896,0.2773063,0.0018193914,0.00014634265,0.001384388,0.0001732398,0.65594524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81490356,0.005287231,0.0059267622,0.05671393,0.00055477885,0.00013183965,0.0004296576,0.000271994,0.11578032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9823663,0.0022215198,0.00045092325,0.0012334512,0.007123044,0.0066046757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98132807,0.0059476686,0.0005504914,0.0010135515,0.007400101,0.003760073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008530692,0.0005147711,0.0008975108,0.0029384312,0.02997085,0.03143195,0.004014775,0.012498288,0.009505626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023896923,0.0012117374,0.00090185186,0.0036284076,0.023695637,0.0068083955,0.0046721376,0.015595759,0.00078279694],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027948268,0.000025977068,0.0010783834,0.00003452839,0.000018291501,0.000171833,0.006728359,0.0004866677,0.00024505967,0.8903654,0.090246156,0.010571414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006530732,0.000020819973,0.010093065,0.0004576495,0.00006291298,0.00006796232,0.010916281,0.0009675892,0.0006606341,0.113699846,0.8627024,0.0002854463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9930387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.839114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16088597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.414957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9732533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396686937","doi":"10.29173/mlj1315","title":"Canadian Constitutional Reform in Comparative Perspective: Some Reflections Occasioned by Richard Albert’s Global Work on Constitutional Amendments","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Work (physics); Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Sociology; Public administration; Law and economics; Art; Engineering","score_opus":0.07031329905679409,"score_gpt":0.35907123541283126,"score_spread":0.2887579363560372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396686937","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013134282,0.053068966,0.0012785279,0.5557718,0.0026098704,0.00003265952,0.00037359088,0.000066398075,0.3736638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6980709,0.06784216,0.0057112593,0.12208848,0.0024965748,0.00015513526,0.00036526218,0.00034569204,0.10292451],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9862104,0.0037019248,0.0002990303,0.0012860558,0.004063538,0.0044389516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868448,0.004442633,0.00031472745,0.000662448,0.0060067074,0.0017287094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010538574,0.0012404203,0.0018688126,0.008802031,0.053827137,0.021275831,0.0043162163,0.009260525,0.013292012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014624559,0.00081171346,0.0011366999,0.018430743,0.04937183,0.009606829,0.006886467,0.018189471,0.0005859863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029731298,0.000018365723,0.00050173607,0.00015645084,0.000027586284,0.00015810494,0.019437566,0.0003387132,0.0001304278,0.8484018,0.11634315,0.014456401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003541035,0.000012114717,0.0033809715,0.00052378897,0.000076300654,0.00009344878,0.031733494,0.000187374,0.00029854916,0.0903464,0.87320447,0.000107650536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99248016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29961315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.29961315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20318168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8123495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396686951","doi":"10.29173/mlj1320","title":"The Unconstitutionality of Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitutional review; Constitutional amendment; Constitution","score_opus":0.05508427168182838,"score_gpt":0.3195592962365658,"score_spread":0.2644750245547374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396686951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07475969,0.0037759123,0.064317286,0.09345242,0.002635485,0.00033150654,0.00041505756,0.0001534119,0.76015925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94867516,0.000794703,0.018128617,0.015241646,0.0018121672,0.00065571064,0.000106939224,0.00008530461,0.0144997025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8404595,0.08253455,0.010230809,0.017616723,0.03537911,0.013779385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8309252,0.11409666,0.007758839,0.026440285,0.018540863,0.0022382096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10143093,0.00081823295,0.0030497422,0.004924421,0.015559783,0.01693058,0.006576949,0.018096581,0.0068951347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15462588,0.002182974,0.00233938,0.0033559212,0.079537995,0.01985265,0.011481649,0.022600127,0.0012653888],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011338915,0.000010328709,0.00008510515,0.000011045142,0.000015144693,0.000041480813,0.0003716494,0.000056801407,0.000051229003,0.9976549,0.00076462975,0.00092633435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059623242,0.000014775602,0.00023995673,0.0000752298,0.000041022402,0.000073657815,0.00033976414,0.00046304308,0.00035551633,0.98767185,0.010633049,0.000032487995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048956485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054413574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10143093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075638783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010955841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5364244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396689874","doi":"10.7202/1111096ar","title":"Different Ways to Get to “Everything”?: Judicializing Everything? The Clash of Constitutionalisms in Canada, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom by Mark S. Harding","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kingdom; History; Genealogy; Biology","score_opus":0.03311867358496082,"score_gpt":0.27591329658897296,"score_spread":0.24279462300401214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396689874","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021653706,0.2565428,0.0008410312,0.55799294,0.002489627,0.00007921032,0.00047027227,0.000027256505,0.15990315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7113905,0.13399495,0.001695256,0.082014896,0.0015375406,0.00011733811,0.00031085208,0.00010160948,0.06883702],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99145144,0.0023894706,0.00028652552,0.0005426659,0.0034733466,0.0018566042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901967,0.0043314113,0.00065644307,0.00038906,0.0035951214,0.0008312641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065767146,0.0004647986,0.00067753217,0.0022548845,0.014838206,0.010264648,0.0016771627,0.0049856016,0.0028436156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016484031,0.00044899923,0.0004633112,0.00457134,0.027034087,0.0044135293,0.0024578387,0.0072870934,0.00042805093],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040929117,0.000023428644,0.001573717,0.00024272129,0.000027939033,0.00021681192,0.012196264,0.000377029,0.00022173661,0.6986849,0.26788896,0.018505616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051602103,0.000021545613,0.018549722,0.0016347795,0.00007135209,0.00013774636,0.024940237,0.00036070088,0.00039255444,0.12358282,0.83010364,0.00015344002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9454687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9729663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07208926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07208926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10531495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5230466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396715385","doi":"10.29173/mlj1274","title":"The Duty as Legislative Counsel as Guardians of the Statue Book: Sui Generis or a Professional Duty of Lawyers?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Duty; Statute; Legislature; Jurisdiction; Legislation; Political science; Exclusive jurisdiction; Guardian; Legislative history","score_opus":0.02375447599015624,"score_gpt":0.2983545051274965,"score_spread":0.2746000291373403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396715385","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19650942,0.00787426,0.0020463737,0.43284363,0.00094249187,0.00003067383,0.000051155068,0.000037705067,0.35966435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9164086,0.0021145928,0.00038938998,0.033197176,0.00043011084,0.000017649643,0.000016028076,0.00001994424,0.04740653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99684465,0.0010139016,0.00006409711,0.0002514273,0.0006704536,0.001155518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954145,0.0017332807,0.0006188173,0.00026972912,0.00058975414,0.0013738427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003712893,0.00013003443,0.00023256638,0.0007864895,0.010277819,0.006871066,0.00098532,0.005751348,0.005434067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011678944,0.0003148603,0.00014102826,0.0008127758,0.021262262,0.006078075,0.0019654788,0.004141838,0.0007981981],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014664144,0.000037830778,0.006393678,0.000029252826,0.0000025546994,0.00024325486,0.074590996,0.000022857206,0.00025715976,0.8796509,0.022306623,0.01645006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039891613,0.0000830571,0.025361517,0.0008070649,0.00003245953,0.0011297235,0.198593,0.00037205848,0.00065010454,0.16810799,0.60475034,0.00007286774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17426983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.384273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8257302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008552955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024815751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34651095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396802195","doi":"10.1080/20403313.2024.2342194","title":"Can the constitutional state accommodate the administrative state? Rousseau versus Hegel","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; State (computer science); Political science; Law; Constitutional law; General will; Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.06618698031715846,"score_gpt":0.3740557401148728,"score_spread":0.30786875979771433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396802195","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061244212,0.015595078,0.031482667,0.12300374,0.00080146577,0.000049045768,0.000056442288,0.00013813806,0.7676292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9681865,0.0033582414,0.003391967,0.0077108033,0.0008342448,0.00009759269,0.000025593194,0.000048798698,0.016346281],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949786,0.002847156,0.00012732888,0.0007822283,0.00058394147,0.0006806353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963714,0.0023062972,0.00023427869,0.0006476142,0.00023942583,0.00020100147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066297916,0.00042344976,0.0007948773,0.0012609961,0.0045632385,0.007882238,0.0010695033,0.0047062323,0.0025995949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009639692,0.00027557084,0.00062123296,0.0008745927,0.059187222,0.015651507,0.004276929,0.0055396156,0.00076847384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013497471,0.0000014721367,0.000019183894,0.0000031847346,5.237744e-7,0.0000037202158,0.000467223,0.000033310593,0.000007746381,0.9986498,0.00028677718,0.000525781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012931713,0.000010920773,0.00010453388,0.00005187936,0.0000025742872,0.000020687197,0.0007882339,0.00013147245,0.000054527634,0.968617,0.03019799,0.0000072245543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005774098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038118565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007882238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00482563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003912561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035062134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396857870","doi":"10.62355/ejels.21907","title":"Which Constitutional Provisions Are Most Important?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European journal of empirical legal studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Computer science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.08724960345109178,"score_gpt":0.3854071406493285,"score_spread":0.29815753719823673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396857870","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7657043,0.007194188,0.010226924,0.016713785,0.00029577757,0.00019247855,0.00083842815,0.00008021924,0.19875391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958075,0.00081107905,0.0012963548,0.00037589655,0.00006759776,0.000013496452,0.000119695906,0.000021409862,0.0014869379],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99499464,0.0017384377,0.0004297087,0.00070421665,0.0012743339,0.00085857365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97322536,0.011878911,0.008805136,0.0017066785,0.0025134324,0.0018704518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054636933,0.00015791677,0.00038395447,0.003280026,0.001829542,0.0044256016,0.0005211589,0.001110259,0.0079193115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030658055,0.00017535823,0.00027105745,0.0048408248,0.0066211703,0.00556574,0.0017109783,0.0015053098,0.0005540359],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027844062,0.000109659355,0.19705164,0.0011234377,0.00018665011,0.0006658859,0.021110626,0.0012016986,0.0075318697,0.53638816,0.006657526,0.22769444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007109405,0.00018360149,0.6102313,0.0010097234,0.00026809104,0.0014303803,0.045657016,0.0011805544,0.0038677687,0.17079909,0.16518183,0.00011958507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028529738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007232815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0079193115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024370188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022145577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02889508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396998963","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4817313","title":"The Frontiers of Nullification and Anticommandeering: Federalism and Extrajudicial Constitutional Interpretation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Nullification; Federalism; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Constitutional interpretation; Law and economics; Law; Constitutional law; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Politics","score_opus":0.009889120692077296,"score_gpt":0.2713139148776738,"score_spread":0.2614247941855965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396998963","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09683554,0.021132218,0.070112556,0.19475655,0.0009266686,0.000055166583,0.00016090435,0.00008811829,0.6159322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878038,0.0013363664,0.003348019,0.0025371304,0.00085989694,0.000057662928,0.000019591938,0.000037553276,0.004000079],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.978018,0.01685226,0.00041348362,0.001477151,0.0018534965,0.0013855133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9333845,0.05757173,0.0020616613,0.0040593874,0.002024942,0.00089775317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02430747,0.000532533,0.0018170488,0.0025653813,0.0081871,0.016639624,0.0030394387,0.010347974,0.0072196955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046279673,0.0007709633,0.0009334534,0.0028390815,0.088119954,0.022433937,0.005621324,0.015544721,0.00043847985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005457871,0.0000052441396,0.000041705018,0.0000042358442,0.0000011248901,0.0000072852054,0.00034293835,0.00005419461,0.000009352363,0.99853754,0.00030219313,0.00068874535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070667247,0.000002299759,0.000073272975,0.0000144965215,0.0000021798758,0.000007153599,0.00021243446,0.00024199288,0.00002516994,0.9976394,0.0017709712,0.0000035866728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007226135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007573495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02430747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007393349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008248536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12855172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398135832","doi":"10.4324/9781003279112-5","title":"Using Network Citation Analysis to Reveal Precedential Archetypes at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Archetype; Citation; Law; Political science; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.05433416707905229,"score_gpt":0.3003604556769294,"score_spread":0.24602628859787715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398135832","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44480616,0.02533217,0.073999025,0.011427616,0.000447567,0.00019655301,0.019700278,0.0008640987,0.42322662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8742778,0.016579304,0.042971477,0.00033334515,0.00016053703,0.00011716087,0.009019876,0.00016901376,0.056371555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992836,0.000101969534,0.00002962424,0.00008737718,0.00042296486,0.00007441875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99639505,0.001929889,0.0002915384,0.00011992482,0.0011733668,0.000090184156],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007216154,0.00020190618,0.00024865314,0.01444097,0.0033539536,0.004031044,0.000757136,0.0005496052,0.0040599257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007140172,0.00014670912,0.00027662748,0.031192973,0.0016375787,0.002075899,0.00083874393,0.00061486126,0.0003826569],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041032035,0.000021944943,0.045784272,0.00048164872,0.00007471701,0.0005167573,0.019315148,0.014369362,0.001459419,0.51240724,0.060380813,0.34514758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072551566,0.000018643366,0.14240034,0.00070564396,0.00012851441,0.0003957243,0.01952883,0.07008245,0.0028090775,0.21505235,0.54873365,0.00013751473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78093725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88602537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98555905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023231514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011794048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44070566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398139013","doi":"10.4324/9781003279112-2","title":"A Bird's-Eye View of the Canadian Supreme Court","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Optometry; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.03910227870302863,"score_gpt":0.27585021066634585,"score_spread":0.23674793196331723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398139013","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058579903,0.05640766,0.008736045,0.051477645,0.0011581451,0.0001565287,0.14852828,0.000682975,0.67427284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55087996,0.07585787,0.01960469,0.009247295,0.0009681677,0.00025553632,0.09564176,0.001309623,0.24623509],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976248,0.00019836596,0.000047458463,0.000252766,0.001412588,0.0004640259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968021,0.0008493535,0.00018207978,0.00015312547,0.0016943975,0.0003189696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013561855,0.00069580314,0.0006217642,0.014332031,0.00897658,0.010630934,0.0017742941,0.00085051183,0.024765061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006406986,0.0004249482,0.0004839503,0.035817474,0.004348363,0.0044090897,0.0013018586,0.0020108693,0.002792958],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000494217,0.000020782116,0.01443783,0.00047419977,0.000045648798,0.00036556198,0.01898705,0.0019422167,0.00057780626,0.2135248,0.6261268,0.12344782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035834494,0.000006818635,0.036732677,0.00037454796,0.000015279582,0.000081044025,0.010469939,0.0008456175,0.00015302454,0.015925411,0.93534195,0.000049992712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9929014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99693525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08461624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08461624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06628371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61393666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398152047","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4368319","title":"Rights and Federalism: Rethinking the Connections","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Democracy; Fundamental rights; Jurisdiction; Law; Cooperative federalism; Charter; Economic Justice; Human rights; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.017725780851150442,"score_gpt":0.28715745991145514,"score_spread":0.2694316790603047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398152047","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09469252,0.013841815,0.04790162,0.3415816,0.0018747667,0.00004033258,0.00025039073,0.00009691463,0.49972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831646,0.0022720217,0.0028616383,0.0055922167,0.0009703313,0.000033379165,0.000037329417,0.00008286626,0.004985508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99367106,0.004123993,0.00014893581,0.0007899673,0.0007212826,0.00054483133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9708438,0.024061278,0.00095432706,0.002524632,0.0011374406,0.00047849346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010571103,0.0003868935,0.00082747213,0.002377038,0.0037959414,0.011096846,0.0020451876,0.0065193456,0.012270847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03179227,0.0004296039,0.00057351793,0.0024661194,0.04752074,0.028628014,0.005321301,0.009259436,0.0006108257],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046218975,0.0000026592197,0.000068266745,0.000006178356,0.0000016203727,0.0000059600548,0.0006387949,0.000041985786,0.000009669299,0.99757963,0.0005378377,0.0011028416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006123995,0.0000022798483,0.00018300116,0.000029935434,0.0000031272577,0.0000072183348,0.0007153888,0.00017769606,0.000027039718,0.9921272,0.0067173713,0.0000036715894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005989331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007839898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012270847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044386047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038731568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055905998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398198849","doi":"10.3726/b19826","title":"Judicial Activism in Comparative Perspective","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Peter Lang Verlag eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Political science; Judicial activism; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Computer science; Judicial review; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.054108104610744445,"score_gpt":0.33636273244726095,"score_spread":0.2822546278365165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398198849","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0076690814,0.055860914,0.0019972774,0.01625195,0.0008635161,0.000014365283,0.00005012667,0.000017605684,0.9172752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8273635,0.057117093,0.0029916144,0.008771834,0.0032684198,0.0002181149,0.00032500701,0.00010470749,0.099839695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970335,0.002021584,0.00004770192,0.00026022625,0.00038039646,0.00025675245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832195,0.0012544398,0.00008679411,0.000096361735,0.00013726152,0.00010323849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016537838,0.00046068954,0.00062948046,0.0032321326,0.0048904526,0.00900245,0.0009297853,0.002059936,0.0060571344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028550646,0.00017832316,0.00031560205,0.004056871,0.014602064,0.006673674,0.0028301522,0.0033154956,0.00046237608],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049913383,0.000010304871,0.000105421284,0.000059116417,0.0000033230206,0.00004400971,0.009038202,0.00006963019,0.00004613036,0.9745062,0.0077179666,0.0083946325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060084444,0.000016024214,0.0012112941,0.0006357625,0.000007952194,0.00016544967,0.021055918,0.00022727626,0.00011607304,0.27758005,0.69897056,0.000007611875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047125644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065054097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00900245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007609743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018763276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055212796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398206455","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192898579.013.37","title":"Developing Judicial Independence","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Political science; Law; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.0521648806554091,"score_gpt":0.2598777042676884,"score_spread":0.20771282361227933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398206455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027111715,0.002663469,0.04232358,0.00888601,0.0002306761,0.00009443483,0.00010269552,0.00009828906,0.9184891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9118218,0.002324094,0.017201215,0.0025812301,0.00039548578,0.0001520608,0.00020037255,0.000093973475,0.0652298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926885,0.003251684,0.0002862018,0.0009276578,0.0021578074,0.00068809756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9817426,0.00975851,0.0014691271,0.0027281367,0.0031386933,0.0011629325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00963596,0.00034662682,0.00041407862,0.0022410953,0.0030242933,0.005926648,0.0015074535,0.0016714003,0.017426867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022819506,0.00043856615,0.00045035957,0.0014201839,0.010730925,0.006148669,0.0077371593,0.004251364,0.0021697239],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041132384,0.0000112508205,0.0003330159,0.000024270295,0.0000025927302,0.000026859236,0.00071913877,0.00022915202,0.00008372218,0.98376876,0.002410593,0.012386501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002089712,0.000031438034,0.0022942591,0.00038799972,0.00001690434,0.00010864938,0.0013404756,0.00155741,0.0008911853,0.8019675,0.19136527,0.000018107143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018673419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035058833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017426867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045762854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065706237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058298707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398327393","doi":"10.7910/dvn/kgritg","title":"Replication Data for: Social Capital, Institutional Rules, and Constitutional Amendment Rates","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Replication (statistics); Amendment; Social capital; Political science; Constitutional amendment; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Constitution; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09633984660403472,"score_gpt":0.35250910137605956,"score_spread":0.25616925477202485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398327393","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015067481,0.000039113784,0.00008656199,0.00018472687,0.00006209091,0.000036172405,0.99869895,0.00012776915,0.00061392505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012366314,0.000052578485,0.00054862857,0.00014484003,0.000032403725,0.00058498763,0.995398,0.00009043523,0.0019114135],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961106,0.0010063064,0.0006733381,0.000778172,0.00095848966,0.00047305724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98046565,0.0049580717,0.0016974829,0.005912724,0.005908558,0.001057619],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006622171,0.0018034497,0.0017120529,0.0030473932,0.001626179,0.003699819,0.004963738,0.0035774831,0.122669905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041181717,0.0011493115,0.0017940516,0.006729125,0.00088825123,0.0015434471,0.0028048547,0.0033100354,0.08458143],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007087808,0.000022770462,0.0007001329,0.00029661498,0.000030779887,0.000016645045,0.000023357245,0.000106340856,0.000034050383,0.0005785651,0.99703085,0.001088879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021135744,0.000040488372,0.012239789,0.00072037865,0.000129578,0.000104917846,0.00018979423,0.00046147083,0.00040474956,0.0040279054,0.9794718,0.00009550528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046134666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07239119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.122669905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025194592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007163097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41037172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398763511","doi":"10.29173/mlj941","title":"Interview with Gerald Nemiroff","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychoanalysis; Psychology; History","score_opus":0.04209474687983891,"score_gpt":0.2765440991623401,"score_spread":0.23444935228250116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398763511","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042878734,0.011529818,0.00019788256,0.9474268,0.003712951,0.000031867923,0.00017580244,0.000033852,0.032603182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04640932,0.008760772,0.00028621114,0.73377717,0.0010949904,0.00013414204,0.00010556538,0.00008066423,0.20935123],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922526,0.00032145504,0.000018856168,0.00008864513,0.00016071962,0.00018517849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99750227,0.0010400278,0.00008302139,0.000041505846,0.0006766867,0.00065642106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026451312,0.0004742495,0.0004923994,0.0007781753,0.013713005,0.0024162338,0.0008570799,0.007535603,0.02724436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006575086,0.0004250888,0.00025556184,0.0011604002,0.002539189,0.004660369,0.001822476,0.01149916,0.007970832],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001907903,0.000023290047,0.0006674973,0.000049929055,0.000002001288,0.0003190175,0.008698105,0.000030839736,0.00013619645,0.003600377,0.97858787,0.007865727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009696188,0.000010468792,0.0024828422,0.00023255478,0.0000025524998,0.00023245874,0.04599242,0.0000425153,0.00010479785,0.0023195276,0.9485449,0.000025339034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10986652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23580053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10986652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061469446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005551978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21845406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399160098","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2024.7","title":"Democracy and the Notwithstanding Clause","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Charter; Political science; Legislature; Constitution; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Law and economics; Skepticism; Context (archaeology); Politics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024353848710301627,"score_gpt":0.30063889887322603,"score_spread":0.27628505016292443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399160098","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05030139,0.003342002,0.008539055,0.035796486,0.0004184171,0.000055804005,0.00010850539,0.00003776395,0.9014006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9783756,0.0006856701,0.00068648503,0.0032303592,0.00012598521,0.00002045575,0.000035855242,0.00001525565,0.016824475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99463415,0.0014138318,0.00013194211,0.00051791774,0.0018518477,0.0014503085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993842,0.0028089117,0.0006287207,0.0005914779,0.001749502,0.00037938356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004154961,0.000159462,0.00029594667,0.0011052544,0.006671026,0.005296232,0.00074200175,0.002139236,0.006513619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01223214,0.00016937392,0.00026380664,0.0012192456,0.024549952,0.0024199695,0.0024006264,0.0044467812,0.00031806686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019258964,0.0000017811664,0.00020203482,0.000004124388,6.1626e-7,0.000018912478,0.00037777267,0.000061831575,0.000022074415,0.9963665,0.0013152694,0.0016272557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016131491,0.000018746437,0.0039384263,0.00018878565,0.000013610882,0.00008740968,0.0015943669,0.0006569351,0.00030439196,0.7828752,0.21027797,0.000028036595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24758282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26103425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7524172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013104845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019999586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49228346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399280637","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjae017","title":"The Frontiers of Nullification and Anticommandeering: Federalism and Extrajudicial Constitutional Interpretation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Nullification; Federalism; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Constitutional law; Constitutional interpretation; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Politics","score_opus":0.017363851217235687,"score_gpt":0.2830628415839839,"score_spread":0.26569899036674827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399280637","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10889107,0.015122904,0.09333976,0.16610007,0.0007088664,0.000066806104,0.00013880379,0.000113347465,0.6155184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898727,0.00075616885,0.0041985493,0.0018532414,0.00015678145,0.000025887706,0.000014415166,0.00002206746,0.0031002061],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9846741,0.010038436,0.00035523184,0.0010295461,0.0024807164,0.0014219224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9765079,0.01685374,0.00094282685,0.0023520992,0.0024199358,0.0009235299],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021033987,0.00029886916,0.00089491653,0.0025548367,0.009722731,0.015368379,0.002222431,0.005637499,0.003716807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018757258,0.00039350748,0.0006623053,0.0023123294,0.1158267,0.008806587,0.0050016697,0.011529318,0.00020263501],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018259328,0.0000013124011,0.00003623436,0.0000025874585,6.8264495e-7,0.000008905784,0.0005722231,0.000059672042,0.000013852462,0.99861,0.00014997601,0.00054272375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007667093,0.000004424249,0.0003047823,0.00006662154,0.0000048247366,0.000017079243,0.0010671949,0.00059726054,0.00007875574,0.9857678,0.0120725,0.000011144443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16902897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13962764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16902897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03253974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023931362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3360902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399403066","doi":"10.1515/9782760644779-008","title":"La Cour D’appel Fédérale Dans Le Système Judiciaire: Appels Auprès De La Cour Suprême Du Canada","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Humanities","score_opus":0.008612619449676248,"score_gpt":0.18289157669921388,"score_spread":0.17427895724953762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399403066","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.066999786,0.013094799,0.0036470813,0.0287608,0.0005578177,0.000058857284,0.00028202072,0.00007691885,0.886522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70454234,0.0030818472,0.0011274369,0.0030478644,0.00017709468,0.000043921464,0.00006110314,0.00008344549,0.28783488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953135,0.0005622697,0.00006285234,0.00048735278,0.0013801174,0.0021938677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978765,0.0007006867,0.000091431706,0.00010862672,0.0007903852,0.00043237067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002053938,0.00046325446,0.0006174734,0.0015174429,0.030909859,0.017157994,0.0019124554,0.0051603843,0.010701509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061029685,0.0009100626,0.00043770229,0.0032074905,0.0148155065,0.0029991742,0.0025778678,0.008744033,0.0007117762],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015013669,0.0000072690177,0.00062077236,0.000013059635,0.0000066851935,0.00010032713,0.007138076,0.00026710893,0.0001148037,0.9645221,0.02076919,0.00642557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032542124,0.000022897599,0.012872256,0.00029467806,0.000047011054,0.000122039775,0.0132350195,0.0011336658,0.00054566504,0.12014416,0.85144717,0.00010288233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9883669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99470043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11893809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11893809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14810498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8629603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399639556","doi":"10.59962/9780774870061-012","title":"10 Women’s Charter Equality at the Supreme Court of Canada: Surprising Losses or Anticipated Failures?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.035427779542269285,"score_gpt":0.22513953237719692,"score_spread":0.18971175283492764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399639556","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036148906,0.012923229,0.00091163657,0.24101128,0.0020333284,0.00008344997,0.0006155196,0.00006032377,0.7062122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5268533,0.0040991087,0.00082525273,0.05082572,0.0006437122,0.00006668781,0.0001559476,0.00011622677,0.41641402],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878094,0.0012048932,0.00012256094,0.0007956482,0.0036667367,0.006400818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941438,0.0011724582,0.00016554362,0.00018174389,0.0026038454,0.0017326585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049646264,0.0005035076,0.00077878515,0.0017325224,0.03756303,0.020175999,0.0037576244,0.011780479,0.016098607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016166959,0.0006373901,0.0005230961,0.0031856254,0.014644314,0.0037452872,0.0034243357,0.013272533,0.0011096008],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024668707,0.000027209095,0.0010447331,0.000028918252,0.000013818899,0.00017294553,0.0064427056,0.0002775034,0.00010244728,0.769897,0.20872217,0.013245987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041683958,0.000021945194,0.009977953,0.00040890957,0.000053749147,0.00008644739,0.020052897,0.00069860806,0.0005389726,0.10158774,0.86640626,0.00012481888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99083614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14329992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14329992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29613015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9936507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399661526","doi":"10.2307/jj.16040332.5","title":"The Canadian Judicial System","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.026781051669376558,"score_gpt":0.21035481611951173,"score_spread":0.18357376445013518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399661526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036838737,0.007495801,0.00027993845,0.022962779,0.0005246894,0.000031548716,0.00039889477,0.000044178367,0.96457833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1516483,0.006423001,0.0007144877,0.007604699,0.00024053532,0.00006622011,0.000274251,0.000098844925,0.8329297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99561125,0.00042869462,0.000058952122,0.00044058668,0.0016548099,0.0018057104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977621,0.00027424732,0.000049228955,0.00013713876,0.0012781281,0.00049913797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017675002,0.0008541494,0.00052959105,0.0032550863,0.028270368,0.015210853,0.0021855794,0.004750993,0.049436036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063000373,0.000743616,0.00050372846,0.005346663,0.010014133,0.0033039153,0.0025305275,0.005228393,0.004300174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010502111,0.000008811001,0.00030423477,0.000028084689,0.0000034594852,0.00005101364,0.0015764363,0.00014981022,0.00003896456,0.75589406,0.22843738,0.013497209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062837426,0.0000036270528,0.0016403337,0.00008492524,0.0000065518043,0.00002359895,0.001999361,0.00013083119,0.00004513508,0.028569648,0.9674676,0.000021982822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9936034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8286946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17130539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22821108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9611683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399661804","doi":"10.2307/jj.16040332.4","title":"The Rule of Law in the Canadian Constitution","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Political science; Rule of law","score_opus":0.034447488980426634,"score_gpt":0.22859483179922976,"score_spread":0.19414734281880314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399661804","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0069432054,0.012159649,0.0013033511,0.02761528,0.0006821817,0.00004436778,0.00020777289,0.000037206748,0.95100707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54036564,0.0108300205,0.0026031812,0.009921789,0.00070194923,0.00008123747,0.00017524081,0.00014930262,0.4351716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961748,0.00073700515,0.000075493255,0.0003712159,0.0013368259,0.0013046659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99781525,0.00077528483,0.000057321835,0.00015103284,0.0009256822,0.0002754441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002894585,0.0005730166,0.000564629,0.0028447097,0.017593969,0.013796617,0.0017670543,0.0050003505,0.0112328185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008162605,0.0007348652,0.00038744102,0.004355462,0.02518222,0.0031444514,0.0015426978,0.0069166063,0.0009822096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042291717,0.0000033432823,0.0000825135,0.0000121697785,0.0000014491005,0.00002542624,0.0014181421,0.00018445762,0.00002691207,0.9772341,0.017065056,0.0039422037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021347638,0.000007652049,0.0023022406,0.00023966066,0.000018164163,0.000035249548,0.0025846737,0.00052906206,0.000137871,0.2839548,0.7101238,0.000045584384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98846567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99392796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8758663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12413371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1849489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90065736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400073978","doi":"10.1515/9781773855714-024","title":"Appendix A: Canadian Code of Ethics for Psychologists, Fourth Edition","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Separation of powers; Computer science; Political science; Law; Programming language; Constitution","score_opus":0.09494943315595505,"score_gpt":0.295737166391423,"score_spread":0.20078773323546795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400073978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009101018,0.004769652,0.003512483,0.021731477,0.0048737703,0.0022461654,0.099196106,0.001068812,0.8616915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007284962,0.0037367614,0.009579639,0.009403575,0.0007877001,0.0021294062,0.02888185,0.00082188525,0.93737423],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926319,0.00094551925,0.0005293185,0.00038583454,0.0045125172,0.000994862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9562109,0.007715284,0.000763647,0.0016777116,0.031820092,0.0018124047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005603988,0.0013760856,0.0012170845,0.0115134185,0.008670107,0.008342944,0.0035606306,0.0059695994,0.24407041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036016557,0.0014156097,0.000720379,0.016468987,0.0027796756,0.0030795478,0.0016602997,0.0061270106,0.08162194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045064508,0.000007660959,0.000047093738,0.000042159154,5.76917e-7,0.0000071526174,0.00007618422,0.00003292875,0.000012650242,0.0081456015,0.9874978,0.0041256775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007743398,0.000002441476,0.0010474959,0.00011197172,0.0000017151347,0.000022334409,0.00016317725,0.000048222137,0.000031573258,0.00271911,0.995827,0.000017087992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.865638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9181405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24407041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05592464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14683385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81649685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400074304","doi":"10.1515/9781773855714-045","title":"5.8 The Challenge of Judging Supreme Court of Canada Judges","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.028471685861097377,"score_gpt":0.2123259285902185,"score_spread":0.18385424272912113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400074304","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007862782,0.0066744545,0.0017064316,0.059132304,0.000712283,0.00004691562,0.0002340764,0.00003583675,0.9235949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44693908,0.004170911,0.0031680393,0.029437767,0.00063037913,0.0000928296,0.00015171188,0.000101155994,0.5153081],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951082,0.0009355189,0.000072220006,0.00030875774,0.0018549048,0.0017202822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99696606,0.0009815963,0.00007283837,0.00010688225,0.00151347,0.00035913696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002817011,0.0004447234,0.00044180598,0.0017804193,0.015728198,0.010433309,0.0019977887,0.009221783,0.010822077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010025234,0.0004594839,0.00042395285,0.0018107988,0.009518596,0.002312205,0.0014716674,0.0065934593,0.0015481927],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008053958,0.000005811425,0.0003989851,0.000020522184,0.0000043775494,0.000090081034,0.0014426208,0.00019103484,0.000071757866,0.9013184,0.090094574,0.006353785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025013529,0.000013546109,0.004514927,0.00043792668,0.000027287228,0.0000747756,0.004007399,0.0014342626,0.00043375525,0.29572356,0.69325244,0.000055216413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92756486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9782624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07243514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.049486104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07483373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3590485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400083081","doi":"10.1093/9780191991288.001.0001","title":"Shared Rule in Federal Theory and Practice","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.0327778276988274,"score_gpt":0.32969100009233554,"score_spread":0.2969131723935081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400083081","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014190628,0.012939827,0.046173453,0.032017868,0.0005400811,0.000044794346,0.000069840746,0.000098840996,0.89392465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93885726,0.0044169887,0.0085306745,0.0023428244,0.00042864046,0.00013388848,0.000090963484,0.00006572356,0.045132987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99470705,0.0031625363,0.00015822923,0.0006384287,0.0009385995,0.0003952305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961325,0.0025883615,0.00019183035,0.0006049493,0.00036259042,0.000119881326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046228166,0.00028623777,0.0005132696,0.0014964781,0.004810175,0.008377526,0.0013556412,0.0028995324,0.006228298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062742,0.00024981922,0.00047064084,0.0019445516,0.030901605,0.0063953586,0.003105471,0.0037533664,0.00070471654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.0795626e-7,0.0000013849002,0.000015356114,0.0000041265907,4.426255e-7,0.0000041866615,0.0002795018,0.00009438869,0.0000033804467,0.99804026,0.00064657425,0.0009100779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029923333,0.0000040259642,0.000110619345,0.000086993794,0.0000016625007,0.000018196255,0.0006048318,0.00051826594,0.000036477588,0.9519349,0.046677914,0.000003200846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006506719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056967326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008389018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008389018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045669265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060866833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400115270","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-51093-9_7","title":"Constitutional Referendums and Elite Cooperation in Western Federal Systems","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Federalism and internal conflicts","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Elite; Political science; Political economy; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.05094544645755327,"score_gpt":0.2976279212633356,"score_spread":0.24668247480578231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400115270","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15565251,0.0029940258,0.0021722745,0.0045933533,0.000075115306,0.000021667769,0.000026847836,0.000021812339,0.8344423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9505253,0.000656505,0.0005559022,0.00047468973,0.00006200221,0.000030797524,0.00001761376,0.00001275414,0.04766461],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875927,0.0005917974,0.000030125573,0.00014999183,0.00015298868,0.00031579958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879223,0.00077786116,0.0001315291,0.00008713629,0.00011856787,0.00009262342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002334576,0.00020858775,0.0002840515,0.0019231673,0.009419501,0.0082261525,0.00085037935,0.0018686551,0.005653458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035345508,0.000233651,0.00013549972,0.004411814,0.01938822,0.0030039046,0.0020690882,0.0024255118,0.00032244265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053467566,0.000009055517,0.00021954431,0.000005322266,0.0000012325754,0.000016926373,0.0068924,0.00010213859,0.00003339993,0.9875738,0.0011130157,0.004027702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000298035,0.000027782247,0.0078215385,0.00014639959,0.000019348287,0.000053533404,0.017932344,0.0009510685,0.00039374124,0.85922265,0.113385126,0.000016613572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031162526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09662708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031162526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006940156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050460747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061962306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400115340","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-51093-9_12","title":"Federalism and the Protection of Fundamental Rights: Between Standardization/Centralization and Subsidiarity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Federalism and internal conflicts","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Federalism; Standardization; Political science; Business; Law; International trade; European union","score_opus":0.034488491416131556,"score_gpt":0.27837187644623534,"score_spread":0.2438833850301038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400115340","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019580737,0.007939627,0.02117231,0.01953157,0.00031720323,0.00003376654,0.00005189299,0.00003583952,0.931337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9262781,0.002822481,0.0064364313,0.003601329,0.0006965607,0.00014253969,0.000059977436,0.0000695115,0.059893135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963013,0.0018698088,0.00009732524,0.00045978825,0.0007187056,0.0005530946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965043,0.002390838,0.00021522457,0.0005409388,0.00025987296,0.00008877353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043273233,0.0003718873,0.0006979865,0.0010467487,0.0036339194,0.008017768,0.0011239354,0.0036190622,0.0044561066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007416769,0.00041871227,0.00050559774,0.0017039566,0.026534295,0.007196165,0.0025791444,0.007239663,0.00057993334],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.683127e-7,0.0000013230848,0.0000084502735,0.0000014689471,3.2988345e-7,0.0000016064662,0.00008711154,0.000026013238,0.000009845737,0.9991086,0.00031554632,0.00043893512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003575292,0.000001862301,0.00006842339,0.0000123173195,0.0000011758542,0.0000065369145,0.000060542978,0.00010734555,0.000047737438,0.9912554,0.00843364,0.0000014808613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006418714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007816126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008017768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006360809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069995383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04615116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400256968","doi":"10.4324/9781032723952","title":"Supermajority Voting in Constitutional Courts","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University","keywords":"Voting; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03415131984384824,"score_gpt":0.3047415275738949,"score_spread":0.27059020773004666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400256968","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012369319,0.009573084,0.07864147,0.012001763,0.0016477474,0.000093209004,0.00007982951,0.0001535337,0.88544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64533204,0.0065917172,0.033697233,0.0050607203,0.0022172013,0.00020030163,0.0001308606,0.00018208526,0.30658785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99630654,0.0017996005,0.000121265904,0.00035952454,0.0011342549,0.00027889415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99575645,0.0031097627,0.00016300424,0.00031093697,0.0005417197,0.00011812545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033281692,0.00019673973,0.0003712911,0.0007469239,0.0023257192,0.0033465694,0.00078478485,0.00091370475,0.0060577374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074558705,0.00031220212,0.00030185157,0.001003174,0.0039409027,0.0034103054,0.0011828993,0.0026665255,0.0010806086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029807252,0.0000026505784,0.000058155118,0.00001637199,0.0000013775262,0.00001900117,0.00022051892,0.0002661308,0.00007671536,0.9777158,0.0078154765,0.013804737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075042376,0.000014312264,0.0002774596,0.000054433604,0.0000057384254,0.00004265516,0.00018047841,0.0021703031,0.0003495072,0.8006117,0.19627719,0.000008728152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030510372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065719998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060577374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025069176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002185829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020265162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400472676","doi":"10.1515/9781773855196","title":"Law, Politics, and the Judicial Process in Canada, 5th Edition","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law; Political science; Process (computing); Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.016052976887278556,"score_gpt":0.21938996603028374,"score_spread":0.2033369891430052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400472676","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016740176,0.19501139,0.0009291039,0.031159902,0.005995737,0.00009231072,0.0032401222,0.00031947432,0.76157784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02313251,0.119549334,0.0016592948,0.0075185616,0.0019662096,0.00010856645,0.0022646415,0.00026238864,0.84353846],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852484,0.000064591935,0.000034309556,0.00007609267,0.0010785676,0.00022159958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987225,0.00017463916,0.00004198877,0.000043562926,0.00085558346,0.00016166491],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005998894,0.0010588943,0.00054714124,0.0038003793,0.008175605,0.008342509,0.0012850203,0.0017134954,0.033749085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024204808,0.00047190278,0.0003348955,0.008709881,0.004777224,0.0021090414,0.001084622,0.00207882,0.006976489],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004672209,0.000008889501,0.00017530829,0.0001215624,0.0000020078369,0.0000462423,0.0011442008,0.00021922588,0.00008487824,0.05166125,0.91224307,0.03428866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001452613,0.0000012919143,0.00083493674,0.00017874024,0.0000016150084,0.000021677966,0.00037548726,0.000048297043,0.000019824734,0.0034581712,0.995053,0.000005559669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96350104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98481846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09628529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09628529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14186047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69860196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400487288","doi":"10.4337/ccs.2024.01.05","title":"Giving individual remedies in social rights litigation their due","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Constitutional Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Neglect; Law and economics; Political science; Transformative learning; Economics; Business; Law; Democracy; Sociology; Politics; Medicine","score_opus":0.20013886921196294,"score_gpt":0.41017101197632033,"score_spread":0.2100321427643574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400487288","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058302104,0.0064857276,0.13769276,0.12245741,0.0029112077,0.0005854708,0.000057602952,0.00054491736,0.6709628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9266145,0.0018180227,0.021390188,0.01801772,0.0011153278,0.00036601815,0.00002147959,0.00009796,0.03055876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9576187,0.019626845,0.0021654556,0.0052777124,0.009327989,0.00598329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818277,0.011570068,0.0018312443,0.0028116633,0.0009970071,0.00096231856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030501552,0.0006708941,0.0007341554,0.0024648225,0.011131541,0.015292978,0.0028676605,0.019059576,0.0065927287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038141686,0.0007909005,0.0016595735,0.0013768905,0.05010358,0.0144255785,0.014716453,0.013753688,0.00097255595],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048919665,0.000023352515,0.00016464184,0.000021914406,0.000005877171,0.00006245179,0.0011226757,0.00040365732,0.00009061724,0.9898859,0.0016351999,0.0065787565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049700735,0.000105989,0.0006593509,0.00027061833,0.00003480969,0.00022871213,0.0016617342,0.0018537613,0.00090972503,0.9142918,0.07985978,0.000074141506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038749033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008157788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030501552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008871263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0112320185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1613096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400725596","doi":"10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-041822-030149","title":"Abortion Law Illiberalism and Feminist Politics in Comparative Perspective","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Law and Social Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Politics; Abortion; Law; Political science; Sociology; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.03903105093705932,"score_gpt":0.40153405244315177,"score_spread":0.36250300150609244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400725596","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02939699,0.18122412,0.003996721,0.119634874,0.0010211305,0.000023176402,0.00007918596,0.000020410525,0.6646034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9175074,0.048635717,0.0016535327,0.010451002,0.0022406972,0.000073505085,0.000047408874,0.000038158058,0.019352628],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926541,0.0058888397,0.00005921892,0.0003471706,0.0005677424,0.00048294215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944819,0.0047586244,0.00022273559,0.0001598699,0.00020377514,0.00017306811],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006153759,0.0003909712,0.00048225772,0.0045079114,0.006846835,0.008512651,0.0007987859,0.002699363,0.0054546394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048225257,0.00019877238,0.00023550603,0.002917235,0.049126644,0.0053750277,0.003203395,0.003554738,0.0002681316],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038867047,0.000007922702,0.00012311294,0.0000384163,0.0000024034496,0.000037228536,0.006588395,0.000045647295,0.000041853815,0.9875995,0.0017958706,0.0037158164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009210773,0.000024435662,0.0014783861,0.0005198807,0.000007353385,0.00015611488,0.020435033,0.00019092583,0.00017500001,0.60494435,0.37204975,0.000009557935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065021287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010471996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010393722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010393722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025147337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075412095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400885501","doi":"10.59704/3e11a38eb6763cff","title":"Administrative and Citizen Interpretations of Unwritten Constitutional Principles and Constitutional Silences","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Constitutional interpretation; Law; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.07768356991447932,"score_gpt":0.3596523530040353,"score_spread":0.281968783089556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400885501","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13039947,0.0019217972,0.009176596,0.11135539,0.00064603693,0.00006228393,0.00046761712,0.00012866488,0.7458422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9608015,0.0012170312,0.0013596892,0.0037769342,0.00015925943,0.00003729229,0.0001270553,0.0001406975,0.03238047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97885233,0.008047803,0.0004168819,0.0012874962,0.007228756,0.0041666506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9735947,0.01724535,0.001358376,0.0014219431,0.004910883,0.00146867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016456148,0.00041432405,0.00059731543,0.0047589727,0.023397412,0.029162709,0.0020654977,0.004559863,0.011309914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032149218,0.0005245541,0.0004248666,0.0073233745,0.057902165,0.009977619,0.00631795,0.007837747,0.0006843565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002080209,0.000011070561,0.0015918433,0.000043137596,0.000005469559,0.00017135934,0.22332515,0.00015898286,0.00029530522,0.75347704,0.012913154,0.007986723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024722092,0.0000127809035,0.009993098,0.00044307875,0.000023630808,0.000102562226,0.35357112,0.0009469136,0.00066289917,0.24777113,0.3863491,0.00009903342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7887372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84671766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7887372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07318943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07679732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.531029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400936965","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4899343","title":"TWO USES OF PURPOSE IN STATUTORY INTERPRETATION","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Statutory law; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Computer science; Law; Economics; Programming language","score_opus":0.01599023271362804,"score_gpt":0.3236556526449377,"score_spread":0.30766541993130964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400936965","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.086821206,0.0024822995,0.21948548,0.020970115,0.00066722,0.00025026526,0.00031588555,0.0002486091,0.66875887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9675589,0.00063139945,0.01594428,0.0013327204,0.0005164732,0.00064196734,0.000113570255,0.0002963608,0.012964332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9633545,0.024183057,0.0015021516,0.0024491686,0.0055914954,0.0029196604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90684676,0.06763785,0.0037633134,0.01565303,0.004753982,0.0013450385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026034044,0.0010715573,0.00168979,0.008052026,0.0065055112,0.014389942,0.003973823,0.009473754,0.007750122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059541102,0.0019382004,0.0023758316,0.0067793825,0.06294251,0.03151241,0.010709797,0.010620437,0.0016181228],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011420059,0.000007899785,0.00026793897,0.000013917331,0.0000026649939,0.000016816155,0.0028694412,0.00002596581,0.000037856276,0.99478877,0.00032126994,0.0016360057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023620969,0.00002103615,0.00081910763,0.00009415349,0.000024727995,0.00011683569,0.00236879,0.00054232724,0.00029855507,0.98785585,0.007816472,0.000018502547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018953184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002233764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026034044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00373741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038576166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1376828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401074789","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v15i2.16977","title":"Court, Judges and the Pandemic: Computational Legal Insights from the Ontario Court of Appeal Corpus 2008-2021","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Court of record; Political science; Law of the case; Scrutiny; High Court; Aside; Majority opinion; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.038990600245859555,"score_gpt":0.3059061628279254,"score_spread":0.26691556258206584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401074789","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79309833,0.004644659,0.0049163876,0.015162301,0.00023159815,0.00014840755,0.13929561,0.00045152733,0.042051133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83612835,0.0015045837,0.011081163,0.00055576826,0.00010508531,0.00017795924,0.13986202,0.00020493162,0.0103801675],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920136,0.00026254464,0.000047729518,0.00014767518,0.00023339804,0.000107332846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99203616,0.005491738,0.0005898972,0.0006591223,0.00092694606,0.00029617513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012642624,0.00023887376,0.00033487985,0.0026780574,0.0024153544,0.0024211535,0.0012088018,0.0009704243,0.00481911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012147432,0.00025198268,0.00036999892,0.0067357444,0.0021527777,0.0015592818,0.0015998975,0.0011267425,0.0010333454],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048375194,0.00031929484,0.28827986,0.0011480926,0.00021407423,0.0026593788,0.04206855,0.02165901,0.0018989508,0.07927689,0.4429005,0.1190917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001022187,0.0000344957,0.33617207,0.0004719219,0.00007525937,0.00050536846,0.034486216,0.059587363,0.00079385453,0.022312755,0.54532874,0.00012962594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87087035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9584343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12912965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01389866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007454629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25978017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401106304","doi":"10.1080/02722011.2024.2349426","title":"Debating the Voting Age: How Canadian Legislators Grapple with the Federal Voting Age","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Review of Canadian Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Political science; Public administration; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04137940889533879,"score_gpt":0.31283403698871215,"score_spread":0.27145462809337334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401106304","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2209443,0.046486806,0.0038817052,0.22820736,0.0023433042,0.0001905289,0.0005836943,0.00008117615,0.49728116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9695687,0.007958085,0.0010075477,0.008546318,0.00017654269,0.000036014102,0.00008139878,0.000044007895,0.0125814555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9789833,0.0055449656,0.00043764192,0.0015949409,0.0075013298,0.0059377933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96895325,0.010424108,0.0015980082,0.0010770315,0.014247354,0.0037001867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0247873,0.0002830963,0.00082324963,0.0055120494,0.033965286,0.013988629,0.0034338115,0.0033206018,0.0047452943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04979226,0.00050299696,0.0005715016,0.0070024454,0.02087556,0.004118336,0.0032654558,0.006526781,0.00033648798],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009393914,0.00003904205,0.024974601,0.00041821884,0.00007445335,0.00032505483,0.15736312,0.0004928698,0.0005612305,0.65382767,0.06716629,0.094663486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049027694,0.000046464058,0.08551282,0.0015550106,0.00014806804,0.00010224244,0.11353421,0.00055442366,0.00055391627,0.03278603,0.7649555,0.00020222102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9894582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9956468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81567377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18432623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2393644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94606596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401468721","doi":"10.1515/9782763743516-012","title":"De la densification normative de l’ordre constitutionnel canadien","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.028854574645492917,"score_gpt":0.2703619666250851,"score_spread":0.2415073919795922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401468721","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016072575,0.005406305,0.025251318,0.020907179,0.0008152253,0.000030000003,0.00016022974,0.000118806754,0.93123823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7547042,0.0026323628,0.010540016,0.0028374344,0.0015090223,0.0002495127,0.00015164961,0.00025942767,0.2271164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99444556,0.0022709111,0.00013303748,0.0008125848,0.0016210368,0.00071693264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99739146,0.0013473955,0.000107419066,0.000669356,0.00040312222,0.00008129919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006089842,0.00078553864,0.00094421586,0.0023748814,0.0066579133,0.010457261,0.0015139558,0.0049593947,0.013595094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008966096,0.0006595204,0.0007390991,0.0022399898,0.027233595,0.009907241,0.0030254708,0.010873575,0.0016841408],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001310357,0.0000013790392,0.000008337016,0.0000018030061,5.858697e-7,0.0000032305793,0.00013576112,0.000039808478,0.000009951567,0.99863523,0.0005438961,0.0006185711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015302185,0.0000051162037,0.00022073014,0.000039010596,0.0000042646047,0.000047115398,0.00037239728,0.0004657399,0.00014374134,0.876943,0.121732645,0.000010850646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04895043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03798884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95104957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01450696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070100264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10525584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401469005","doi":"10.1515/9782763743516-004","title":"La légitimité fédérative du processus de nomination des juges à la Cour suprême du Canada","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nomination; Philosophy; Humanities; Art; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01730363087036921,"score_gpt":0.2369622956659014,"score_spread":0.2196586647955322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401469005","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.117521904,0.004991925,0.009122197,0.027872425,0.00048202442,0.00008358478,0.00048891525,0.00013361766,0.83930343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8477522,0.0013133766,0.0017478559,0.0010203801,0.00020009506,0.000046424768,0.00007357534,0.000064713764,0.14778142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98167276,0.003411376,0.00031566137,0.00148453,0.00899221,0.004123541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98621815,0.006505474,0.00052023196,0.000843148,0.005251103,0.0006618891],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009658196,0.00048599517,0.000808748,0.003129037,0.019705858,0.022026747,0.0023124325,0.005169889,0.009823898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030710433,0.0008791776,0.000556811,0.0048210984,0.020129532,0.0035427224,0.0031194242,0.010131799,0.00081408035],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021732623,0.000010355835,0.001111444,0.00001636302,0.000010330525,0.00006526944,0.0028113471,0.00041209388,0.00012515638,0.98201364,0.005595216,0.007807101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010471478,0.00007124799,0.022897309,0.000453749,0.00009118878,0.00023804842,0.012305643,0.0051926738,0.002132113,0.25423878,0.70210135,0.0001731418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.945859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9442337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09211266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09211266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13526668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6683272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401471519","doi":"10.1515/9782763736976-017","title":"Les paradigmes de la modification constitutionnelle au Canada","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.060956902156983385,"score_gpt":0.2833103218405627,"score_spread":0.22235341968357933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401471519","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017404275,0.004962697,0.01038541,0.022482824,0.00039516165,0.000075545264,0.00023043816,0.00008077585,0.94398284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6349424,0.0046142666,0.007203263,0.0036481528,0.00032978575,0.0001853443,0.00012100019,0.00011620194,0.34883958],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953694,0.00094819325,0.00008048101,0.0005947831,0.0018665006,0.0011407079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880004,0.00045486994,0.000057942038,0.0001761972,0.00041976277,0.00009117405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026419582,0.0006065819,0.0006794274,0.002044517,0.013516748,0.0116451215,0.0021465784,0.004278152,0.009331046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00499298,0.0005756533,0.0005741338,0.0035492426,0.02805048,0.0035034036,0.0018621384,0.0077357064,0.00063589873],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012974058,0.0000015096143,0.000018818557,0.000002711453,6.761612e-7,0.000004558888,0.00023970239,0.00008863941,0.000017139018,0.99739575,0.0013488515,0.00088026276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032941996,0.000010553786,0.0010998473,0.00010372983,0.000015127508,0.000042639702,0.0014209815,0.0012666669,0.0002778845,0.6829186,0.3127783,0.000032722473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9365521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94287735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08970084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08970084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.114337854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6508282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401535383","doi":"10.7202/1107463ar","title":"LES TRACES DU DÉBAT SUR LA LÉGITIMITÉ DE LA JUSTICE CONSTITUTIONNELLE DANS LA JURISPRUDENCE DE LA COUR SUPRÊME DU CANADA","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Jurisprudence; Economic Justice; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.006243901085389233,"score_gpt":0.20987659324717672,"score_spread":0.2036326921617875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401535383","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23170327,0.023879481,0.0069365688,0.13477795,0.0005871019,0.00004804912,0.00048578874,0.000055132263,0.60152674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9802955,0.0027462859,0.0004805933,0.0017266414,0.0000790718,0.000010188749,0.00003231225,0.000025497598,0.01460392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99178034,0.0018930822,0.00018144501,0.0006610843,0.00362826,0.0018558204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855435,0.008020393,0.0006762371,0.00063428824,0.0043160566,0.0008094849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064510754,0.00024672895,0.00054841937,0.0022107994,0.020817483,0.01440057,0.0013345636,0.0037690608,0.005008739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022388168,0.00037560434,0.00024029668,0.003950689,0.049136203,0.003784751,0.004258896,0.0077881236,0.00026587312],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014809117,0.000005104835,0.0011888379,0.00003432024,0.000007774677,0.00007701682,0.025058871,0.00015007473,0.00011265156,0.9604409,0.005492532,0.0074170977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053952066,0.00003824892,0.03389226,0.0012302374,0.000072940435,0.00018564085,0.07239416,0.0009479784,0.0015098936,0.37807816,0.5114173,0.0001791919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93083924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9622148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.080652095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.080652095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10309832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5851747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401600851","doi":"10.2307/jj.18252875","title":"Constitutional Politics in Canada and the United States","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"State University of New York Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Political economy; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.036448257019110614,"score_gpt":0.21931592273034367,"score_spread":0.18286766571123306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401600851","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047038738,0.05682531,0.0007638255,0.0781129,0.00095250376,0.00005928073,0.00070024893,0.000076181,0.81547105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70191455,0.022057092,0.00091509323,0.014629164,0.0004610035,0.00008797466,0.00029501872,0.00011926287,0.25952083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99477637,0.0006303178,0.00008126401,0.00030401998,0.0018102921,0.002397733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99653023,0.0010968868,0.00012141072,0.00010506901,0.0012839797,0.0008624886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022488108,0.0005274691,0.0008553981,0.0040116725,0.034326475,0.021076595,0.002363939,0.0056904834,0.010923775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008297999,0.0006481385,0.0004897656,0.010336174,0.022393756,0.002925189,0.0025057707,0.0065555484,0.00054149446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015075684,0.000020787445,0.0007315416,0.000031968164,0.000009069021,0.00010616222,0.004950524,0.0004810835,0.00005904925,0.9257728,0.055441096,0.0123808365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032606396,0.000014440684,0.015366958,0.0005470249,0.000045719153,0.00006599047,0.02005659,0.00092209445,0.00019304478,0.14069949,0.82195586,0.000100107536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9957769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99837327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22657692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22657692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.324389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8970611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401704131","doi":"10.1007/s40803-024-00240-5","title":"A Democracy-Friendly Theory of the Rule of Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hague Journal on the Rule of Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Melbourne","keywords":"Rule of law; Constitutionalism; Democracy; Law; Opposition (politics); Law and economics; Political science; Public law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.028280640437016596,"score_gpt":0.2907778570282945,"score_spread":0.2624972165912779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401704131","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009475927,0.007392504,0.14446811,0.052979268,0.0011486267,0.00011170014,0.00022981035,0.00013738565,0.7840567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81152326,0.008278111,0.042763665,0.012574097,0.0034486211,0.00048354967,0.00026177033,0.00016187203,0.12050507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938892,0.0026349304,0.00023456676,0.0010189373,0.0015156595,0.000706655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99637514,0.0018638432,0.00037128912,0.0006076863,0.0005643346,0.000217724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057020104,0.0005405412,0.00067287206,0.001756315,0.003737364,0.010106317,0.0016469769,0.0037854393,0.006940893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072075324,0.0003506316,0.001028131,0.0016119903,0.02862464,0.008958535,0.002782953,0.0072492207,0.0021270702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.060708e-7,0.0000018107401,0.000014551558,0.0000048731245,7.3061847e-7,0.0000050212443,0.000089226785,0.00011146085,0.0000062174395,0.9987545,0.0004925281,0.00051838637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048868765,0.0000043713285,0.000039840612,0.000022821725,0.0000018363053,0.000012347367,0.000049535367,0.00035298377,0.000030419496,0.9723895,0.027088063,0.0000031966076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058859326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037899483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010106317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006033571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006175389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04377681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401945450","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-61879-6_11","title":"Waluchow’s Theory of Constitutional Interpretation from a Rhetorical-Argumentative Point of View","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Law and philosophy library","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Rhetorical question; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Point (geometry); Philosophy; Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03438864467991597,"score_gpt":0.26853622549405826,"score_spread":0.23414758081414228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401945450","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006117161,0.004452702,0.09752638,0.027061444,0.0012896977,0.00012537834,0.00016923179,0.0001477969,0.86311024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5966118,0.003590553,0.04635117,0.016556364,0.0027533295,0.000896931,0.00017728917,0.00048018093,0.3325824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969541,0.0015286204,0.00011281442,0.0003769168,0.0006553218,0.00037224556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99818254,0.0012808263,0.00009294114,0.00015292164,0.00023162796,0.000059178317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027293414,0.0010399929,0.0009072786,0.0048936303,0.007041035,0.010868914,0.0017647183,0.006596665,0.011717491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052097235,0.0008596641,0.0011540969,0.0044543874,0.024802392,0.012416106,0.0031106537,0.010184318,0.0023291726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010457658,0.0000020572415,0.0000061421756,0.0000055979094,9.038686e-7,0.0000066269076,0.00029262036,0.000018649076,0.000013782595,0.99768376,0.001362711,0.0006060726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048374523,0.0000027112935,0.000025047939,0.00002476708,0.0000042192523,0.000023381272,0.00014660212,0.00014707095,0.000087435415,0.9698454,0.029682755,0.0000058055734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070410725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009680363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011717491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007102896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004200193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05153531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402095628","doi":"10.1177/00914509241269439","title":"Discursively Embedded Institutionalized Stigma in Canadian Judicial Decisions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Drug Problems","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Stigma (botany); Political science; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.0572055905233228,"score_gpt":0.31822283333423906,"score_spread":0.26101724281091626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402095628","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89884967,0.0017728234,0.002525088,0.012406323,0.0001236043,0.0001326822,0.00014469451,0.000025008327,0.084020115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969381,0.0003690187,0.0005395978,0.00035650362,0.000008667425,0.000017859493,0.00002009234,0.00001098486,0.001739169],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97512996,0.010376392,0.0009208509,0.0017410312,0.008430385,0.0034013845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9585735,0.025643561,0.0045544715,0.0016065963,0.007874151,0.0017477017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018170465,0.0006827065,0.00072896027,0.00547636,0.04075998,0.017750626,0.0032713136,0.0031538445,0.0023141187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043610126,0.00074269756,0.00043048774,0.0066301026,0.049690284,0.0043348037,0.009037037,0.0054787286,0.00016479715],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020886864,0.000011668978,0.004196241,0.00009633235,0.0000070539677,0.0006541737,0.94098496,0.00016466029,0.0003816464,0.045867156,0.0011068773,0.006508331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010528307,0.000013881471,0.011954389,0.0005657006,0.000024632553,0.00021053663,0.9043462,0.00069318485,0.0006836229,0.009524523,0.07187597,0.00009691157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94487876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9623961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19792925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19792925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17140225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9302884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402389994","doi":"10.4337/9781035309320.00031","title":"Preserving institutional legitimacy through openness: the Supreme Court of Canada and Chief Justice Wagner","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Legitimacy; Openness to experience; Political science; Law; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03518090092892873,"score_gpt":0.2617089170299404,"score_spread":0.2265280161010117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402389994","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046640802,0.017822128,0.0032088542,0.18862315,0.0010396688,0.00010309662,0.00029986422,0.00008297733,0.7421794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8412489,0.004037543,0.0012836097,0.017384509,0.0003728879,0.00007041295,0.00006847743,0.000111425994,0.13542221],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914078,0.0014864203,0.0001254132,0.0007164576,0.002596361,0.0036674931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929797,0.0028810618,0.00022818684,0.000376796,0.0020569463,0.0014772757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065498464,0.0006128755,0.000904199,0.00229795,0.031967215,0.028109008,0.0030704762,0.011759481,0.008038079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016861157,0.00071643107,0.00045446536,0.003973164,0.041564275,0.007865934,0.0064374497,0.011475605,0.0005510088],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016422366,0.000014910158,0.00047017838,0.000016538072,0.000008177591,0.000085918226,0.0036513153,0.00040043404,0.000048222282,0.95528144,0.033338673,0.006667809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057062025,0.000012175628,0.0029339895,0.00031292377,0.000050816187,0.000056941775,0.011655194,0.0010452197,0.00027478937,0.66761285,0.315868,0.00012006914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97759515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99063724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13352424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13352424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23598963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9687907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402459891","doi":"10.5771/9783748939030","title":"Theorising Comparative Public Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; Yale University","keywords":"Political science; Comparative law; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.08529132256516513,"score_gpt":0.3474732561841544,"score_spread":0.2621819336189893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402459891","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005669782,0.009740354,0.024392782,0.014217149,0.00038623594,0.000031928557,0.00006355967,0.00004431159,0.9454538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8824791,0.010863033,0.012998343,0.0035407837,0.0008586989,0.0002907317,0.00021526802,0.00015486022,0.08859916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99678314,0.0020192673,0.00006408925,0.00029224245,0.00054881105,0.00029242813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980813,0.0013459057,0.000096668904,0.00023937972,0.00015276547,0.000084015206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003897241,0.00044799884,0.00043480517,0.0028225537,0.0039207707,0.007012609,0.0013732297,0.0026365384,0.01048536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048038424,0.00030674218,0.00046146332,0.0027158158,0.030983359,0.011086402,0.003919417,0.0035112898,0.0009911441],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.7408616e-7,0.0000016773001,0.000010560149,0.000006045446,4.785779e-7,0.0000065018066,0.00036251702,0.000040657305,0.0000038315065,0.997898,0.0007082248,0.00096100377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026230516,0.000003261049,0.000056097495,0.000081644415,0.0000017403858,0.00002723281,0.0011507726,0.00018580064,0.000026134996,0.94054204,0.057920992,0.0000016159906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038356397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033386217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01048536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009028091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003029678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06550372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402516137","doi":"10.1111/capa.12575","title":"Modernizing Canada's Electoral System: What Drove the Creation of the National Register of Electors?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Register (sociolinguistics); Political science; Business; Public administration","score_opus":0.035578998413995505,"score_gpt":0.2814305521508475,"score_spread":0.245851553736852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402516137","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5261051,0.005918199,0.009211277,0.15143807,0.0016284962,0.00038622413,0.001900074,0.00043190375,0.3029806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96606964,0.0011553988,0.003050714,0.002080793,0.00020225106,0.00004609253,0.00023942438,0.00008997401,0.027065776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99206066,0.0016851538,0.00022477857,0.00066297635,0.0028164433,0.0025500124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9790546,0.0026116122,0.0011637835,0.0013222492,0.012333989,0.0035139397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010410225,0.00021991816,0.00038196385,0.0034659046,0.015895147,0.012109405,0.0019761333,0.0010264164,0.007796333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030090392,0.0004183494,0.00023615405,0.0049999426,0.008274168,0.0031209667,0.0029182702,0.0030300352,0.0006148859],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017298892,0.00012259114,0.05545816,0.00027991243,0.000039456067,0.00031896064,0.04011592,0.0017607929,0.0013863399,0.5740803,0.08509996,0.24116464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039791998,0.00009525979,0.1393006,0.00040199765,0.000045649165,0.000119434364,0.027919559,0.0017298354,0.0011927903,0.011008267,0.8179597,0.00018704112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.985753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9935475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13017035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13017035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23106302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9444564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402986217","doi":"10.4324/9781003577102-20","title":"Law, Convention, Prerogative: Reflections Prompted By The Canadian Constitutional Case","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Convention; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.05315394796405548,"score_gpt":0.3235051421602879,"score_spread":0.27035119419623244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402986217","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05286338,0.014726675,0.0010936444,0.51166004,0.0020528415,0.000086601925,0.00041418316,0.000049125112,0.41705358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64468455,0.008566409,0.0016817647,0.10865443,0.0010579086,0.00013624807,0.00016844059,0.0002122527,0.23483801],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909604,0.0016756139,0.00013464173,0.0007755156,0.0026158406,0.0038379095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881196,0.007198587,0.00030505643,0.00021033351,0.0025116352,0.0016547485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008395735,0.00069227343,0.0009329031,0.0033663423,0.06036759,0.024508258,0.0041371356,0.020427031,0.013448434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020945232,0.00095920253,0.00084502914,0.008103513,0.0481782,0.0082060555,0.0049227863,0.019348329,0.0007257613],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000392208,0.000026510043,0.0005488165,0.00006435097,0.0000055676496,0.0005278269,0.0541707,0.0002652953,0.00022452045,0.8148897,0.1224855,0.0067518493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041845735,0.000013943718,0.0053512277,0.0003170875,0.000025384084,0.00016009047,0.14371626,0.00047021086,0.00030949636,0.06832274,0.7811226,0.0001490421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99508345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99817574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30245796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.30245796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25543982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8090499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403765740","doi":"10.5020/2317-2150.2024.14827","title":"National Council of Justice and the one test: democratizing the Brazilian Judiciary","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicas","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Test (biology); Economic Justice; Democracy; Law; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.06094019629640765,"score_gpt":0.3128658194771532,"score_spread":0.2519256231807455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403765740","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4356661,0.010336855,0.006023764,0.122403465,0.0009187259,0.00020608996,0.00014012611,0.000062377534,0.42424253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874635,0.0008769494,0.0015961642,0.003570177,0.00012220272,0.00003668159,0.000027932136,0.000013249877,0.0062932055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98660034,0.0058792923,0.00041933564,0.0011938836,0.003841314,0.0020658718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889242,0.004322127,0.0012994036,0.0010550242,0.0025518457,0.0018474432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012300717,0.0002373778,0.00044957933,0.0019268319,0.008252519,0.0057471883,0.0008541844,0.002108969,0.0026366375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033783138,0.00022024634,0.00026365378,0.0020018085,0.00875815,0.0028056456,0.0049338425,0.0033522488,0.0002608847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064794636,0.000115748335,0.02820262,0.00020632325,0.00003047645,0.00046738135,0.030311668,0.00046882592,0.0010122275,0.81185335,0.013032883,0.11423379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012941597,0.00041239386,0.18903822,0.0015606788,0.00012329413,0.00054021686,0.035511,0.0022715107,0.00192956,0.15647262,0.6118854,0.00012568009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.116213314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24290068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.116213314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013660125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029558208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2310738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404331321","doi":"10.5380/rinc.v11i3.93874","title":"Constitutional Law around the globe: judicial review in Canada and the “leave to appeal” to the Supreme Court","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Investigações Constitucionais","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Globe; Political science; Medicine; Ophthalmology","score_opus":0.02623933458475329,"score_gpt":0.2795685213300442,"score_spread":0.25332918674529087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404331321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25879475,0.04804862,0.003621324,0.19766422,0.0010245129,0.00015860856,0.00053421105,0.00008387012,0.49006987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96356964,0.007811596,0.00074361305,0.009691779,0.0002584717,0.000031057494,0.00009093481,0.000043828924,0.017759105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9789225,0.0036952544,0.00034984667,0.0019557471,0.009258873,0.0058178524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9729546,0.011045698,0.0019447975,0.00080617575,0.008550143,0.004698468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011062057,0.00028208678,0.000803162,0.005690449,0.029728236,0.02340248,0.0027055407,0.0044028484,0.0055066673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0417514,0.00047114183,0.00045273907,0.010065241,0.036018096,0.0071572424,0.0052507627,0.0066918368,0.0002768842],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003654804,0.00003950271,0.008035396,0.00010070338,0.000029640272,0.00037130906,0.031141283,0.00054223585,0.00021347876,0.89949405,0.0265055,0.03349027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008134738,0.000070470225,0.08194148,0.0016769279,0.00011433855,0.0003345124,0.08710896,0.0022225147,0.0006692622,0.16450626,0.6609777,0.00029615872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9840088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99080807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17787945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17787945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28770697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9535433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404377710","doi":"10.1163/09763457-bja10078","title":"Extending Voting Rights to Emigrants","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diaspora Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Emigration; Political science; Computer security; Computer science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.06439875418850274,"score_gpt":0.37906291760212846,"score_spread":0.3146641634136257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404377710","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9755122,0.0003873067,0.000595751,0.0004741719,0.000026793265,0.000037219877,0.0076865824,0.000017629662,0.01526243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98804885,0.00019336255,0.00043681354,0.0001254564,0.00002682898,0.00004932379,0.007426514,0.000007600696,0.0036852227],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998796,0.00037593028,0.000105616266,0.00032342967,0.00014053023,0.0002584904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915183,0.0027925132,0.0030158192,0.0012537208,0.00087389123,0.000545732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018172096,0.00019748964,0.00039928386,0.0018170669,0.0008488468,0.0012681446,0.0005829573,0.00038124374,0.01010367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010821878,0.00010985121,0.00027713855,0.0024905482,0.0006883804,0.0010334015,0.0016385355,0.00092132913,0.0012062582],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004044155,0.00020827811,0.89129055,0.00035104126,0.00010124639,0.0005198159,0.009089285,0.0012312564,0.0012386609,0.009111516,0.01280298,0.073650934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002763327,0.00011157384,0.9138217,0.00021261336,0.000042303283,0.0002018504,0.011001888,0.001031146,0.0012443052,0.0034898415,0.06879126,0.000023949477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013351711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025568297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013351711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070558576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004284426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033800125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404536783","doi":"10.5040/9781509975105.ch-012","title":"Resolving Dicey’s Contradictions? Rights, Freedoms, and Parliamentary Sovereignty in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Parliamentary sovereignty; Political science; Law; Political economy; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.013344478329277633,"score_gpt":0.2420572352595917,"score_spread":0.22871275693031407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404536783","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20954797,0.01209013,0.0019171204,0.20219786,0.0005522718,0.00009405822,0.0011801972,0.00008110468,0.5723394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8902427,0.003130822,0.0009357248,0.010168097,0.00013014529,0.00003504119,0.00014048342,0.000059891066,0.09515719],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99544686,0.0006126874,0.00009444665,0.00034333477,0.00092600065,0.0025767083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99441284,0.0025408985,0.00023133379,0.00021202405,0.001693993,0.00090899575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044317576,0.0003162671,0.0007764335,0.0021188739,0.025183616,0.0134054,0.0024520329,0.005884624,0.020913957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01420631,0.00034804555,0.0004859855,0.0039317454,0.011204579,0.004332588,0.0035877628,0.0060485452,0.0006143592],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003977246,0.000023616869,0.0025960442,0.00006559659,0.000022009375,0.00016697789,0.007975329,0.00068892183,0.00010391641,0.93436307,0.03890321,0.015051513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000114190014,0.000028203536,0.023114523,0.00045638732,0.00014537672,0.000113241214,0.05261156,0.0037183536,0.0010246773,0.30055162,0.61790717,0.00021469414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99539053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13345249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13345249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23755364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9682701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404586027","doi":"10.21991/cf29479","title":"Notwithstanding the Notwithstanding Clause","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Compromise; Constitution; Political science; Law; Charter; Federalism; Politics; Human rights; Democracy; Law and economics; Constitutional law; Independence (probability theory); Sociology","score_opus":0.035735627502750104,"score_gpt":0.30974509407732737,"score_spread":0.27400946657457725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404586027","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029079137,0.0012505274,0.022725148,0.019412044,0.0011810058,0.00012820968,0.00045956843,0.00018930931,0.9255751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84341246,0.0012454733,0.0109414235,0.022419523,0.0007176358,0.00019927057,0.0005811774,0.00015580335,0.12032725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958884,0.00043203012,0.0001308455,0.0006819236,0.0015688229,0.0012979549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99711347,0.00093022804,0.00021498819,0.0005359907,0.0010470238,0.0001582814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038414889,0.00031348405,0.00044987473,0.0007334733,0.0055186846,0.0042506214,0.0015338806,0.002799975,0.008754892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009059304,0.0003024326,0.00044300474,0.00060930697,0.010596278,0.0029463377,0.0016391386,0.005590471,0.0010503744],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031290786,0.0000017879627,0.000099781966,0.0000052803434,8.3353854e-7,0.000014523445,0.00024688878,0.000044266282,0.000083774314,0.9942473,0.0030415128,0.0022108217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027387292,0.0000346796,0.0027291866,0.00016474836,0.000038371592,0.00017268247,0.00070259627,0.00066524727,0.0012733294,0.39875537,0.59537977,0.000056609897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30885372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.313866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30885372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006872397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01932787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61411196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404622236","doi":"10.1093/9780191996344.003.0005","title":"Canon and Comparative Constitutional Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Generality; Canon; Context (archaeology); Representativeness heuristic; Constitutional law; Population; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Law; Linguistics; Geography; Psychology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0931467001989707,"score_gpt":0.32288797650559986,"score_spread":0.22974127630662916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404622236","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0097758435,0.007978624,0.010907499,0.011333609,0.0003724986,0.000049067716,0.0001214125,0.000051136147,0.9594103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93383914,0.0039162757,0.0076217065,0.004584919,0.0007074517,0.0002594373,0.00031482909,0.000085742926,0.048670605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885754,0.008107661,0.00027409662,0.0010187024,0.0014113655,0.0006128368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926885,0.004495271,0.0003836493,0.0013446567,0.0007666421,0.00032128795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009763869,0.00043098803,0.0005963356,0.005302876,0.006070648,0.009227718,0.0013841782,0.0029198006,0.015819564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0143853435,0.00023892708,0.0003330539,0.0044748224,0.029545272,0.009769385,0.0061458987,0.0034563032,0.000892113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014567383,0.0000017225542,0.000023590885,0.000007319239,6.9101986e-7,0.0000064882042,0.00026589553,0.000040359875,0.0000055967726,0.997957,0.0006250792,0.0010647409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004722348,0.000009525768,0.0001514531,0.00014435459,0.0000024291717,0.000024704736,0.0008095741,0.00020489805,0.000053597298,0.8961824,0.10240694,0.0000054602283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043296865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004825873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015819564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010523623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035549053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07635456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404622306","doi":"10.1093/9780191996344.003.0017","title":"Rights as the Domain of Weak-Form Review","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Judicial review; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Subject (documents); Sociology","score_opus":0.02865305825386754,"score_gpt":0.29976914463322374,"score_spread":0.2711160863793562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404622306","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016175006,0.00906151,0.08089113,0.03638011,0.00097330275,0.00014988016,0.00007165779,0.00013668963,0.8561607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77710694,0.007115091,0.024089068,0.009870759,0.0019485451,0.0003448731,0.000108678214,0.0001412988,0.17927472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98883677,0.0064051016,0.00042094727,0.0010741005,0.0028313817,0.00043174627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9705796,0.021562079,0.0011659161,0.0027009193,0.0036076484,0.00038382236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00980226,0.00023254045,0.00038561394,0.001889731,0.0018274584,0.008228518,0.0011208775,0.0023349172,0.0049416604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02525416,0.0003394307,0.0004067059,0.0013093625,0.015438977,0.008702329,0.0029640533,0.0039594634,0.0011170949],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018604318,0.0000023731263,0.00003776771,0.000013420823,9.3113226e-7,0.000014932881,0.00022591662,0.00012515963,0.000049972088,0.99171585,0.0020574378,0.005754381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006135064,0.000011230473,0.0001301915,0.00008607333,0.000004440745,0.000059617276,0.00013865094,0.00091982004,0.00029290578,0.9111633,0.08717992,0.000007802266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015254805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015911312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00980226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042686253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037080755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051839948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404696545","doi":"10.7202/1114752ar","title":"One Rule to Rule Them All: Subordinate Legislation and the Law of Judicial Review","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Statute; Supreme court; Lawmaking; Political science; Law; Judicial review; Context (archaeology); Ultra vires; Rule of law; Legislature; Law and economics; Common law; Economics; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.06088305575232307,"score_gpt":0.33318139531767976,"score_spread":0.2722983395653567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404696545","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0568102,0.032254666,0.23990336,0.23740327,0.004018504,0.00031610846,0.0002961624,0.00054289785,0.42845476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8534597,0.0063847876,0.060569957,0.043273937,0.0033277771,0.00038350432,0.000114078364,0.00022336587,0.03226274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9637002,0.012389835,0.0023843835,0.008498809,0.009811794,0.0032149584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9765213,0.013728887,0.002372426,0.0034308976,0.0029857233,0.00096072763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022818282,0.00037584198,0.0011250827,0.0023396683,0.005874638,0.013818563,0.0028899547,0.011419437,0.0018552374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037437726,0.00094626885,0.0015207849,0.0015599768,0.03402075,0.009175399,0.003700614,0.014526852,0.00089651934],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036279403,0.0000044158996,0.00010583746,0.00000944782,0.0000036311178,0.000013257361,0.00028451247,0.000107346896,0.000059882972,0.9954846,0.0017306623,0.0021928358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004449553,0.000048954655,0.0005289609,0.00016263778,0.00002187818,0.000084388164,0.00020664113,0.0012605498,0.00048131653,0.90769595,0.08939928,0.00006511578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022893248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019145668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022893248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010884104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017139686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12067604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404989003","doi":"10.1017/9781316831946.019","title":"Cambridge Studies in Law and Society","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.06124413271378588,"score_gpt":0.36212349196168286,"score_spread":0.300879359247897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404989003","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013321696,0.044518765,0.0003708917,0.020233529,0.001458922,0.000039402355,0.00060006947,0.00015187479,0.9312945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.044735443,0.014583653,0.00033028607,0.0072024562,0.0040925373,0.00024985214,0.00027957253,0.00022912421,0.9282971],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986821,0.0005955908,0.000056986697,0.00016572447,0.00030946944,0.00019020619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969212,0.0017893909,0.00013439676,0.00039494134,0.00039228814,0.0003678033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016380403,0.0016022461,0.0016160582,0.004932321,0.006219282,0.010553411,0.0019502355,0.013593117,0.21543814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005777567,0.0005455758,0.0004102229,0.005872096,0.0071551125,0.0067623197,0.0036080298,0.0057609836,0.031934008],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001596272,0.00003124568,0.00011475569,0.00022855478,0.0000045660004,0.000073256866,0.00086707063,0.00005775145,0.0000899014,0.6829191,0.30172056,0.013877209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027038608,0.000021856476,0.0010252999,0.00052581984,0.000008711832,0.000055295855,0.00087282073,0.00012962749,0.00012010794,0.088643536,0.9085527,0.000017069813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.076190636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13969398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21543814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0105698705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046574506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7207124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405131174","doi":"","title":"Cooperative constitutionalism: From law, to technology, to language or how to escape the promise of global emancipation","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"book-chapter","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.019848488263362954,"score_gpt":0.2751908675902895,"score_spread":0.25534237932692655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405131174","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01191073,0.0054405998,0.012457161,0.03154009,0.0004630317,0.000026370615,0.000046797246,0.00006432039,0.93805087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8497292,0.0037950135,0.0028232003,0.004820992,0.00074911595,0.0001263798,0.0000740165,0.00016225492,0.13771993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99609107,0.0020279405,0.00008584531,0.0004902868,0.00078280945,0.0005220664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958865,0.0027152712,0.00019378659,0.00067122007,0.00030904464,0.00022424416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053555127,0.00047890426,0.0006115545,0.001016292,0.0048715235,0.013530284,0.0014830085,0.003696193,0.010177284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008277663,0.000262505,0.00044921436,0.002006989,0.04692597,0.011364971,0.005072853,0.007131672,0.0012144042],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.2017866e-7,0.0000018766488,0.000008735867,0.000003897365,5.5005614e-7,0.0000036263468,0.00060502725,0.000023604776,0.00001302229,0.99755293,0.0008623307,0.00092373486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042042684,0.0000045540733,0.00006675773,0.000038906255,0.0000021660571,0.000014967305,0.0012012789,0.00010093122,0.000072310475,0.9306792,0.067811735,0.0000029672153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054759495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006113931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013530284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070352578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072893496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051044583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405177591","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5039013","title":"Power Over Parliament: The Status and Future of the Justiciability of the Legislative Process","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Parliament; Legislature; Legislative process; Power (physics); Process (computing); Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Politics; Law; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.009429911360568383,"score_gpt":0.28894079497019565,"score_spread":0.2795108836096273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405177591","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12476481,0.018410543,0.010768632,0.2903677,0.0010673463,0.00002523011,0.00020147405,0.000042451124,0.55435187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98727554,0.0021077637,0.00046652823,0.002326534,0.0011502656,0.00001944103,0.00003816295,0.000025431806,0.0065904437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98875844,0.006320399,0.00028023563,0.0012537404,0.0019118699,0.0014752356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95299935,0.03637858,0.0026610123,0.0031373259,0.0030601728,0.0017635279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01952174,0.00028532447,0.0007813091,0.0019302994,0.0050601256,0.013248056,0.0018059718,0.005022005,0.011308411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05010999,0.00029808548,0.00044555447,0.0027778521,0.04247899,0.017554829,0.0036651427,0.0067507196,0.00096207915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027120786,0.000009721533,0.0002565467,0.000019847574,0.0000036258532,0.000017286617,0.0019878736,0.0001064866,0.000041457086,0.9911116,0.0013130688,0.005105508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015148526,0.000009453225,0.0008618731,0.000051101608,0.0000043283444,0.000015299036,0.0008984162,0.0002543018,0.000080873186,0.97944814,0.018353678,0.0000073561646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062701846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039111567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01952174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043954737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006912157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1032421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405224118","doi":"10.22201/iij.24487937e.2025.19.18773","title":"Waluchow’s constitutional morality and the artificial reason of the Common Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Problema Anuario de Filosofía y Teoría del Derecho","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Rationality; Law; Philosophy of law; Scope (computer science); Constitutional law; Philosophy; Rule of law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Public law; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.033711042017283824,"score_gpt":0.296853218188618,"score_spread":0.2631421761713342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405224118","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09260832,0.014561662,0.23628408,0.10759172,0.0011221727,0.00012770915,0.00014134565,0.00013859762,0.5474244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9653478,0.0016889087,0.015044598,0.0046770666,0.00049497426,0.000099548204,0.000028857483,0.000036782254,0.012581553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99521893,0.002393326,0.00016886542,0.00073024904,0.000991864,0.0004967739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960639,0.0025703781,0.0003179292,0.0004919682,0.00039471817,0.00016104124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064687952,0.00034416773,0.000508026,0.0022571932,0.0040129777,0.0071061347,0.0011142216,0.0042253113,0.0022755663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008628799,0.0002933446,0.00061429775,0.0012824007,0.043520555,0.008463367,0.0031815034,0.0050869486,0.00025795057],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.408557e-7,9.623908e-7,0.00001552422,0.0000022607765,5.034103e-7,0.0000043021805,0.00014353552,0.000034933757,0.000010401992,0.9993055,0.0001411918,0.00034023167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048106926,0.0000038929056,0.00006554816,0.000014467596,0.0000016983442,0.000013056281,0.00010846001,0.00017783613,0.000058090012,0.98754454,0.012003345,0.0000043399805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046536033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038544277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071061347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005500693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00427686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039910495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405357716","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4991203","title":"Judicial Dialogues in Mixed Jurisdiction Courts: How Civilian and Common Law Judges Converse on Canada’s Supreme Court","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Converse; Supreme court; Jurisdiction; Political science; Original jurisdiction; Common law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.014054710131509674,"score_gpt":0.24717518882766865,"score_spread":0.23312047869615898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405357716","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6463495,0.0014060297,0.0037254477,0.043568276,0.0003825502,0.000113270384,0.00030607314,0.00011521786,0.30403358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98598677,0.00015196018,0.00057493825,0.00230244,0.00003937477,0.000038202073,0.0000632855,0.00006296895,0.010780052],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98043925,0.010022787,0.00029038533,0.00160099,0.0035327259,0.0041138185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95054615,0.030099116,0.0018366296,0.0013873288,0.008129404,0.008001423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012944741,0.00037858824,0.00082261086,0.0036887676,0.054840222,0.028292049,0.0038963177,0.0106502045,0.011421795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.064269274,0.0008768503,0.000478238,0.003949153,0.02123616,0.0102564795,0.009762736,0.007358957,0.0012595436],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105417625,0.000046571666,0.007940447,0.000036596448,0.000021955806,0.00079513964,0.90485924,0.00017838432,0.00051871303,0.060391977,0.015101502,0.010004006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060105845,0.000031578038,0.016831521,0.00026164824,0.000058376376,0.0001740576,0.82061005,0.0011829128,0.00048122133,0.026128188,0.13405108,0.00012931187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87192523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92885876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.949597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050403003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.081066124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36570108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405493505","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5052704","title":"The Statutory Interpretation Jurisprudence of Sir Lyman Duff","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Jurisprudence; Interpretation (philosophy); Statutory law; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.011100591902900966,"score_gpt":0.3051533473796229,"score_spread":0.29405275547672194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405493505","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006434876,0.04506552,0.0054859533,0.805989,0.0070335306,0.000026045655,0.00007863066,0.000033227927,0.12985314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49719143,0.024792092,0.0063192407,0.30728516,0.020907411,0.00028013848,0.0000876645,0.00033508876,0.14280175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99116313,0.0053978404,0.00023251904,0.0011394667,0.0015433026,0.0005237269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98645395,0.011643409,0.00028550412,0.0004312338,0.000858265,0.0003275847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010473794,0.0005679444,0.0015318322,0.0024090344,0.008470301,0.008144635,0.0014186227,0.01284646,0.0038217814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020262873,0.00078924827,0.0004105373,0.001918747,0.030954855,0.009929497,0.0033431645,0.025030809,0.0010340209],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007684622,0.0000064168735,0.0000369515,0.000013893107,0.0000022694198,0.00002028983,0.0009356596,0.00005408032,0.000017469856,0.9504165,0.04648065,0.0020080796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021413578,0.000009181206,0.00015428381,0.00023208724,0.000005075143,0.000053376698,0.0006139474,0.00032117811,0.00012666725,0.6528859,0.34555173,0.000025199883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014805967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012582513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014805967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075360276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052962196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05539137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406268164","doi":"10.4337/ccs.2024.0032","title":"Holistic interpretation and the interdependence of constitutional structures and rights: an essay in honor of Cheryl Saunders","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Constitutional Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Law and economics; Political science; Interdependence; Human rights; Context (archaeology); Law; Democracy; Normative; Separation of powers; Constitutional law; Constitution; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.10734654030703557,"score_gpt":0.40691126374667075,"score_spread":0.2995647234396352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406268164","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017453445,0.13309346,0.023272505,0.5488975,0.008738127,0.000044954115,0.0000856784,0.000048371425,0.26836607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7681123,0.09363983,0.012072813,0.058597162,0.013211571,0.00017647273,0.00014381035,0.00019583179,0.05385026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959927,0.002375822,0.00008460258,0.00042866162,0.00081130647,0.00030687798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948295,0.004180981,0.00017946129,0.00023332772,0.00044605654,0.00013071173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006375506,0.0004919115,0.0006754375,0.0013592351,0.005052586,0.006870259,0.0011357717,0.0032478045,0.0026850023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008810893,0.00041443185,0.0004996155,0.0018362157,0.037070855,0.01239829,0.0029123388,0.0077761933,0.0003958238],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005208123,0.000008457457,0.00006433079,0.000055871464,0.0000037363534,0.00003301551,0.0071361843,0.00017689154,0.00004850772,0.9594425,0.024948562,0.008076761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009835216,0.000009741067,0.00037914992,0.0003257234,0.0000051963007,0.000054392534,0.00481689,0.00020800838,0.000061164625,0.7514845,0.24263294,0.000012576974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007074141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008583935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007866317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007866317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048732134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057074428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406326514","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v39.9019","title":"The Democratizing Influence of Intervention","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0380645486569132,"score_gpt":0.3638239986170885,"score_spread":0.32575944996017525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406326514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04644021,0.0012366057,0.023648245,0.036219962,0.00024378928,0.00013436169,0.00004914299,0.00010179324,0.89192593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98013866,0.00038875072,0.0020073205,0.003289939,0.00016408565,0.000076237084,0.000014410902,0.000036493657,0.013884195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9612692,0.020662831,0.00089539774,0.0051213247,0.007865195,0.0041860463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9548026,0.029543865,0.003151885,0.007643269,0.0033418078,0.0015165798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023876062,0.00044806395,0.0006267742,0.0015321801,0.006237702,0.010275728,0.0017606383,0.0048209266,0.0097863795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036023553,0.0003898108,0.0008063987,0.001061317,0.03877652,0.006395528,0.009786501,0.006902394,0.0009345951],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012702587,0.000022165603,0.00032754062,0.00004138802,0.000010585388,0.000050674415,0.002451093,0.00030258225,0.0003550067,0.98930186,0.0009709915,0.006153397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008380969,0.00013984724,0.0029816797,0.00037964314,0.00007911579,0.00016764473,0.0035940192,0.0011482476,0.0026556964,0.8112092,0.17751929,0.000041763833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014241137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013974279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023876062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009995529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01662526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12627017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406327004","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v39.9018","title":"The Importance of Effective Access to Justice for Charter Violations and the Role of the Court Challenges Program","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Charter; Economic Justice; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.035966301314531976,"score_gpt":0.3635254641516331,"score_spread":0.3275591628371011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406327004","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.090597466,0.004397791,0.005844686,0.1625612,0.00046532237,0.00016910497,0.00014212687,0.00008896499,0.73573333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9505022,0.0021858313,0.0013167349,0.011655238,0.00019428352,0.00008340688,0.00003206282,0.000046633337,0.03398355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9799502,0.0063124024,0.00033497656,0.0010135066,0.0051856367,0.0072033443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96897024,0.01698695,0.0020111492,0.001006774,0.0032374328,0.0077875233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010639507,0.00016669967,0.00044532688,0.002080813,0.019255651,0.020598736,0.0019140817,0.004556756,0.017307067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037975363,0.00031847192,0.00030218097,0.0017245389,0.028444879,0.010071852,0.010650385,0.0081923725,0.0007763725],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016440285,0.000075850505,0.004360369,0.000082126346,0.000008015472,0.00046058538,0.027620351,0.0002750921,0.00016485964,0.9015139,0.018126873,0.04729559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004014585,0.00012675021,0.03338371,0.0012488901,0.00004140998,0.00053547765,0.09764343,0.0007269485,0.0004950314,0.31306106,0.55255914,0.00013807806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5320804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6826735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4679196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029223705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.097506195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9413505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406598080","doi":"10.1177/07349149241312179","title":"An Enquiry Concerning Administrative Discretion in Indigenous Consultations","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Statutory law; Agency (philosophy); Adjudication; Legislation; Indigenous; Administrative law; Political science; Structuring; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Law; Law and economics; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.04596859955352929,"score_gpt":0.3746969456790901,"score_spread":0.32872834612556084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406598080","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12204431,0.0064411,0.07125964,0.55231434,0.0023768356,0.00029593168,0.00009928288,0.00007449345,0.24509408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9576711,0.0012158154,0.008723561,0.024204295,0.0008047043,0.00014642956,0.000014897844,0.000044618348,0.0071744337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8468508,0.10858646,0.0074885134,0.006741365,0.019157497,0.011175295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79333067,0.17974873,0.00661709,0.008606009,0.009851488,0.0018459134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.123797156,0.0003130623,0.00076002395,0.001585947,0.021809006,0.019312149,0.0054527465,0.015888808,0.003177017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19558035,0.00078446144,0.0011574831,0.002282003,0.060335454,0.024306262,0.010157114,0.022230554,0.00031223902],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000147194,0.000014158898,0.00038815293,0.00005143208,0.000007739997,0.00018863971,0.048330203,0.0002105219,0.00014980063,0.9444044,0.0020893393,0.0041507725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055355897,0.000051873863,0.0020200985,0.0009185695,0.00004292038,0.00036631746,0.07774868,0.0017885922,0.0014249304,0.704094,0.2113445,0.00014429717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024063103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032405347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.123797156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017099256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023651293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65470976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406767273","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-42437-3_10","title":"Same-Sex Marriage: The Structural Articulation of “Equal Dignity”","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Articulation (sociology); Sociology; Gender studies; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.041125432750586804,"score_gpt":0.30139278587830787,"score_spread":0.2602673531277211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406767273","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023649678,0.0027975093,0.014235705,0.02541323,0.00044980805,0.000053363146,0.00005940295,0.000028824952,0.9333125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94337153,0.00091735105,0.0028093462,0.0033268372,0.00034470367,0.000099397,0.000036326703,0.000044590015,0.04904994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958941,0.0024283717,0.00008774855,0.00043034268,0.0006363368,0.0005231288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979001,0.0012019002,0.00014167186,0.00039772666,0.00020548013,0.00015315009],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004370614,0.00030506638,0.00047687168,0.0008327588,0.0066339946,0.006866792,0.0018196339,0.004156678,0.0063404175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007830753,0.0003783761,0.000317735,0.0011101575,0.053441502,0.0065117087,0.003469787,0.0063663176,0.0006568256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010895652,0.0000018087874,0.000013349308,0.000001801605,2.7313317e-7,0.0000035218654,0.0006420425,0.000010322149,0.000007103015,0.99842465,0.00038386876,0.0005101343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059630956,0.000005845177,0.00015121116,0.000027936221,0.0000024108826,0.000021147905,0.0012685464,0.00010334348,0.00007495503,0.97590464,0.022430278,0.0000037228335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008081183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013388723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008081183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042285766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074362173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030680597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407084403","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5099987","title":"When the Administrative State Encounters the Constitution","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; State (computer science); Political science; Administrative law; Public administration; Law; Computer science; Algorithm","score_opus":0.028758387111335142,"score_gpt":0.32519092524716636,"score_spread":0.2964325381358312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407084403","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2611548,0.00096139876,0.004628867,0.10847057,0.00095312507,0.00005332302,0.0001599641,0.00011469575,0.6235033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97458684,0.00026713265,0.00038511294,0.003255759,0.00025797696,0.00002364806,0.000046225254,0.00007242285,0.021104867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99206454,0.0029996887,0.0002755461,0.00076545984,0.0014459795,0.0024488152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99029946,0.006090744,0.00096795463,0.0007017223,0.0007140621,0.001226029],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007291169,0.00012230327,0.00043307836,0.0012540293,0.008025858,0.017839145,0.0008141311,0.007671466,0.019182757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036726974,0.0004360003,0.00038520023,0.0014645974,0.0100549655,0.013368752,0.005715939,0.009775121,0.002137249],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008320589,0.000047698486,0.0038804014,0.000035445053,0.000009992322,0.0010334487,0.030371603,0.00013710863,0.0004892576,0.9348866,0.019142784,0.009882545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003200251,0.00005205063,0.009758075,0.00019385651,0.000028295253,0.00068962824,0.10062642,0.00086451997,0.0010768045,0.6902129,0.19640684,0.000058561454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052554724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006096152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019182757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045082513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006152377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064172745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407350768","doi":"10.7202/1116144ar","title":"Lorne M. Sossin and Gerard Kennedy, Boundaries of Judicial Review : The Law of Justiciability in Canada, 3rd ed., Toronto, Thomson Reuters, 2024, 575 p., ISBN 978-1-0382-0557-5.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Law; Sociology; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.0091557356119518,"score_gpt":0.25186265135822744,"score_spread":0.24270691574627565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407350768","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001497078,0.9398007,0.0007915529,0.03357271,0.00163529,0.000024848217,0.00036095185,0.000059986607,0.023604184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0073225196,0.9172117,0.0016277502,0.007177825,0.0020372334,0.00006698941,0.0004156376,0.00012203221,0.06401832],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960723,0.00071883376,0.00024173029,0.00041077888,0.002211278,0.000344993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99560565,0.0019320997,0.00046501006,0.00009867926,0.0015618718,0.0003366741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00255021,0.0019682662,0.0012174676,0.0055374037,0.0033892982,0.006688323,0.0025912677,0.0064538447,0.03673412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060870172,0.0016474718,0.000596553,0.009694059,0.0062965695,0.008663232,0.0019040866,0.004422628,0.017851714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001749482,0.000008573104,0.00017459493,0.0007576854,0.000009470332,0.00005956603,0.00100247,0.00010409217,0.000060085327,0.021941423,0.9294041,0.046460398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010925382,0.0000052374485,0.0017016736,0.0013876627,0.0000108788145,0.00011112487,0.0008467805,0.000072717725,0.00007600539,0.014019062,0.98172647,0.000031403004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45729613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6469918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54270387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022051126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02371135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90926874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407410707","doi":"10.1017/elo.2024.54","title":"European constitutional scholars in the digital public sphere: reply to Somek and Paar","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Law Open","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Public sphere; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.05835808860626399,"score_gpt":0.31172053186966403,"score_spread":0.2533624432634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407410707","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007431684,0.0025577096,0.00016175832,0.99278134,0.001336843,0.0000018097492,0.000011266298,0.0000068671957,0.0023993102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0652725,0.0048994673,0.0005389434,0.9148188,0.009462203,0.000045453125,0.000019892219,0.000060807233,0.0048819254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9701839,0.017275186,0.0015794539,0.004159482,0.004976361,0.0018255638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8095911,0.17006877,0.00403147,0.004167155,0.008736556,0.0034049638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035259765,0.00077245384,0.0017152515,0.0024913514,0.011221629,0.019580623,0.004616193,0.05081166,0.005829254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.103137106,0.0006946066,0.0009230219,0.0043436126,0.037756138,0.031052623,0.011625682,0.044603664,0.0015077443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060984647,0.000042622083,0.00035084033,0.00020255047,0.000019594596,0.00027562087,0.011281618,0.00016793338,0.000087470435,0.54546416,0.43267265,0.009373931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000676835,0.00002737831,0.00097164896,0.0011426444,0.000026111962,0.0002488701,0.01846821,0.00046952837,0.00039440318,0.26210636,0.7159331,0.00014409199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077557755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070421626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05081166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008735621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066623334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18647373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407562796","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5116585","title":"Judging Readability: A Study of Opinions by Apex-Court Judges from Australia, Canada, South Africa, the United Kingdom, and the United States","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Readability; Kingdom; Apex (geometry); Political science; Law; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.029502324483874937,"score_gpt":0.2910804499321518,"score_spread":0.26157812544827685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407562796","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948119,0.00013050628,0.00003290373,0.00021010314,0.0000054334378,0.0000138821015,0.00005920237,9.746421e-7,0.0047350386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99834645,0.00012446383,0.000047077025,0.0001045789,0.00000619263,0.000007096541,0.00006834646,0.0000040103296,0.0012917263],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99495786,0.0014535558,0.00027145757,0.00031609315,0.0021783677,0.0008226983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94400024,0.02681775,0.006170927,0.0011400989,0.018147433,0.0037235992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005508177,0.00017870562,0.0005203369,0.002267923,0.0047085644,0.003677995,0.0006206189,0.00081973633,0.0023295693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049071968,0.00021628839,0.0002269291,0.0043015545,0.0029062529,0.0011699727,0.0015027083,0.0015079,0.0003104092],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053334964,0.00019789902,0.40345633,0.00011365549,0.000095575546,0.0013243011,0.560518,0.00019595098,0.0018676796,0.0024567223,0.00347921,0.025761312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024496445,0.00012444462,0.8095474,0.00009404517,0.000040796443,0.0002267456,0.17970486,0.00034179073,0.0006202278,0.000583172,0.008645401,0.000046718076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40798217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6446305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5920178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005757088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00729189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8112149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407984527","doi":"10.1177/14748851251314735","title":"Hamilton's fear: Republican judicial review and the separation of complicit powers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; Kelowna General Hospital; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Separation of powers; Philosophy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.01999780710642225,"score_gpt":0.3334159596771743,"score_spread":0.31341815257075206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407984527","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04523432,0.00466716,0.014686345,0.5190655,0.0008180945,0.00009822963,0.00007143298,0.00010684285,0.41525206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89822674,0.0012285109,0.0013585853,0.06754711,0.000872896,0.00005872943,0.000013804682,0.000056626242,0.030636948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853872,0.0050899033,0.00038406282,0.0017635436,0.0048857788,0.0024894343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.976384,0.01707756,0.0016664482,0.0018295442,0.0022663195,0.00077615376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012034856,0.00025752178,0.0005930931,0.0011443147,0.0083194,0.009725219,0.0014311819,0.00931373,0.00554777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03674806,0.00050312094,0.0005974023,0.0014504844,0.035344157,0.007829871,0.0046730316,0.011907031,0.000668428],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001530973,0.000006156511,0.00021952912,0.000013547252,0.000005014453,0.000054633343,0.0015705575,0.000086612614,0.000086311156,0.9834557,0.01061448,0.0038720327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006854317,0.000023471583,0.001264972,0.00008348782,0.000022634029,0.00011667429,0.0014034101,0.00088020205,0.0003911968,0.91549903,0.08020087,0.000045519257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07457652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.072168365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07457652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015613285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017510625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14828491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408065977","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-68020-5_9","title":"The Law and Judiciary","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Marx, Engels, and Marxisms","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02119088990848591,"score_gpt":0.24815870324725658,"score_spread":0.22696781333877067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408065977","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005315852,0.027349385,0.0034067878,0.039391737,0.00076761836,0.00002234343,0.000070010086,0.000029196239,0.92364705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7731972,0.008681657,0.0022788104,0.014281254,0.0028818375,0.0001495927,0.00006808021,0.00008064135,0.19838098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963116,0.0018739732,0.000082297855,0.00046157718,0.0008031139,0.00046745143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976547,0.0014668796,0.00015363737,0.00031847518,0.00026887728,0.00013733104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036237903,0.0004959005,0.0006080852,0.0012015777,0.006024855,0.008425226,0.001241507,0.0055051553,0.006676634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007693936,0.00041096547,0.00027164238,0.0017624199,0.030698169,0.0043264315,0.0016280364,0.0065820785,0.0014934858],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017543521,0.0000030889396,0.000019565829,0.0000037765499,7.201296e-7,0.0000046868954,0.00021490878,0.000040426945,0.000009395185,0.99452424,0.0041793054,0.0009981353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006067744,0.000003323873,0.00014112417,0.0000536273,0.0000016030397,0.000009577123,0.00037660755,0.00011243493,0.000041235562,0.92250043,0.07675012,0.0000039270003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013606089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021474177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013606089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076602907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00856407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055579543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408092897","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1446","title":"Legislative Choices in Using Section 33 and Judicial Scrutiny","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Section (typography); Legislature; Political science; Law; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.06737450936170093,"score_gpt":0.36371738814732113,"score_spread":0.2963428787856202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408092897","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16294463,0.00463022,0.02347376,0.04645729,0.00046360857,0.00028196728,0.00014013518,0.000093663155,0.7615147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9765372,0.0010234796,0.003655606,0.0076825167,0.00015440668,0.00010054863,0.0000225727,0.000052546755,0.010771149],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93624526,0.022372529,0.0024266671,0.0074074273,0.01957103,0.01197703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9634115,0.02430702,0.0026456723,0.0026764197,0.005859767,0.0010997137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05197314,0.00029845626,0.00053381646,0.0029372817,0.009838683,0.01162697,0.0022870458,0.004538677,0.0032886767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06821167,0.00090855896,0.00071657787,0.0027412886,0.024247633,0.0046502165,0.003646079,0.006880476,0.00036279875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028815532,0.000010779949,0.0025988673,0.00003803197,0.000020584912,0.000111915295,0.010209209,0.00043005688,0.0011945204,0.96994025,0.0029099423,0.012507029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011531627,0.00017205704,0.040590394,0.0012027146,0.00018677094,0.00022750851,0.023758203,0.002126362,0.0051040524,0.44967267,0.47639796,0.00044600075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3559614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55883557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3559614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03072578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040316086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70777893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408226825","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2024-0008","title":"Deference as informed respect: <i>Vavilov’s</i> implications for procedural review of legislative functions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Cégep de Jonquière","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Legislature; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02745905059110631,"score_gpt":0.3123904438579811,"score_spread":0.2849313932668748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408226825","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03986089,0.025344558,0.12575808,0.2801006,0.002262395,0.00018649537,0.00015917313,0.0002061626,0.52612174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92458767,0.0027938224,0.015452197,0.031595554,0.00085446617,0.00011000626,0.000032095144,0.000071905655,0.024502339],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97815794,0.0084036235,0.0010879018,0.0031061475,0.0065249396,0.0027194275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98242503,0.009884291,0.0013179255,0.0019811234,0.003338254,0.0010535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022291683,0.00037154407,0.00063099473,0.0019108341,0.007336868,0.011933506,0.0025260455,0.007942625,0.0021070794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036217343,0.00042044974,0.001138604,0.0012439993,0.045373704,0.0083009,0.005885595,0.008533463,0.00037990173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029945577,0.0000019037544,0.00006394323,0.00001007822,0.0000018868328,0.000018256036,0.00088190346,0.00007695715,0.0000394722,0.99650025,0.0009306135,0.0014716513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015779686,0.00002156488,0.0005058209,0.00016456317,0.000017585187,0.00008498482,0.0007226903,0.00055484375,0.00030274005,0.8917238,0.10584991,0.000035751716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14033158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11902717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14033158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025372908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03547918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2790295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408810334","doi":"10.53555/sfs.v10i1.1720","title":"An Analytical Study of Parliamentary Privileges in India with Light On Judicial Review","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Parliament; Politics","score_opus":0.18764166719131925,"score_gpt":0.3605097626380346,"score_spread":0.17286809544671533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408810334","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32844657,0.042332344,0.012261673,0.051659096,0.0010346889,0.0004401099,0.00035282638,0.000102430204,0.5633703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798641,0.0046205516,0.0011365574,0.0022618335,0.00038631086,0.000091256734,0.000046372756,0.000022110306,0.011570877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9744495,0.011305838,0.0013798203,0.0014729659,0.007855867,0.0035359934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92834294,0.05177194,0.005880673,0.0024325235,0.0102714915,0.001300483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016060185,0.00016161974,0.0005629524,0.008402653,0.008358272,0.010880681,0.0018132784,0.0023700239,0.002425881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050926995,0.00042618165,0.0005976249,0.010330604,0.011413825,0.0036105625,0.0033291532,0.0031644353,0.00027077305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020835665,0.00002596579,0.004128197,0.0002212698,0.000017976547,0.00078358245,0.018704008,0.00040885797,0.00027431658,0.94817656,0.007765124,0.019473359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031832966,0.00011323531,0.064611815,0.0017997056,0.00018648939,0.0016220862,0.04620468,0.0034991796,0.0021382277,0.20092107,0.6786418,0.00022984242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032258827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051140845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032258827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017715784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018025178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1285376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408824646","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5172897","title":"Failure to Adapt: Readability Deficits in Canadian Court Decisions Involving Parties with Unique Reading Needs","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Readability; Reading (process); Psychology; Business; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.021685429350912205,"score_gpt":0.2838589700860755,"score_spread":0.2621735407351633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408824646","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95784,0.0002870059,0.00016420442,0.004224616,0.000024755956,0.0000504711,0.00047748108,0.00001846134,0.03691291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969789,0.000080302314,0.000098217184,0.00031964987,0.0000071573627,0.000010371007,0.000103267375,0.000011324641,0.0023908727],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915916,0.0008547347,0.00041073636,0.0008745574,0.0040920437,0.0021762562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93803483,0.023921162,0.009849245,0.0034835052,0.020064373,0.004646909],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007878097,0.00023550178,0.00044070248,0.0028364544,0.008266272,0.0058944128,0.002611994,0.0024282155,0.01171912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.100119926,0.00032876476,0.0003348524,0.005105851,0.0048052217,0.0030507413,0.0026899597,0.002842011,0.0006757459],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010980337,0.00076035113,0.56138086,0.00020881271,0.000121729696,0.003753562,0.19369707,0.0027730109,0.0026048697,0.038784612,0.040741056,0.15407597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004268914,0.000050511993,0.9133189,0.00013488246,0.000053459884,0.0005525758,0.061262727,0.0013373093,0.0006877625,0.0077006826,0.014731863,0.00012669912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9757613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98558587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038159873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038159873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057110563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2768706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409143079","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5202941","title":"What is the Standard of Review for (Mixed) Constitutional Questions?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.016540829774327498,"score_gpt":0.33252272659232324,"score_spread":0.3159818968179957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409143079","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017801821,0.047159243,0.10165652,0.7153786,0.019859359,0.0013147519,0.0012644702,0.0005914133,0.094973855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.664528,0.0132200075,0.1261259,0.15277298,0.02706235,0.0055676466,0.000880781,0.0006526322,0.009189729],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.3956761,0.35759953,0.06912735,0.027893754,0.1408561,0.008847143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.09288456,0.635772,0.041517638,0.07310547,0.14936683,0.0073535326],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.629593,0.0011699977,0.00778241,0.018329436,0.013767632,0.041539207,0.015384558,0.03349514,0.0068877395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.85315377,0.0024603102,0.0042283377,0.012565576,0.042802457,0.050801564,0.011944795,0.019912668,0.0030306575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003549298,0.00014326954,0.0064233914,0.0037537909,0.00081570074,0.00012849631,0.004881623,0.00059318624,0.00046411404,0.82901937,0.065451115,0.087970994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003307876,0.00019939734,0.0067190286,0.0070889597,0.0005732767,0.0002689851,0.003173802,0.0026408515,0.0010986378,0.88098943,0.09662255,0.0002942246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006496426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009713186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.629593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020396985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03941054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4567778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409460564","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5216773","title":"Evaluating the Constitutionality of Bill 21 Amid Restricted Judicial Review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Law; Political science; Judicial review; Law and economics; Supreme court; Economics","score_opus":0.08206943971429005,"score_gpt":0.413043261643368,"score_spread":0.330973821929078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409460564","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59110147,0.001197256,0.006743621,0.030677782,0.0006020457,0.0004472025,0.00048355965,0.000108402644,0.3686386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918543,0.00013399145,0.000695887,0.0024260797,0.00043569764,0.0001447851,0.00006210002,0.000023702874,0.0042233877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8918971,0.039962515,0.004856004,0.011112547,0.026679704,0.025492206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6275985,0.30748737,0.02456903,0.018524982,0.01462663,0.0071934825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.099440925,0.0007039641,0.0036968288,0.005041181,0.011598368,0.020189356,0.0054118717,0.019475315,0.013836874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28369042,0.0011710324,0.0021532634,0.004120989,0.027482115,0.010986694,0.0075895824,0.01841396,0.0014627102],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006905872,0.00017844021,0.0052258126,0.0000697209,0.00015737221,0.00043532887,0.0010128936,0.0025773216,0.0007271926,0.9801293,0.003756137,0.005039932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006765495,0.0011268817,0.024316039,0.00017469404,0.00060777867,0.00023053828,0.0033484108,0.008210539,0.0025809994,0.93352854,0.024989367,0.00020969343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012434941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015968066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.099440925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014212088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02207025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5259001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409707895","doi":"10.1080/02722011.2024.2435195","title":"Moving Toward a Government Trust Ecosystem in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Review of Canadian Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; MacEwan University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Ecosystem; Business; Environmental resource management; Political science; Environmental planning; Public relations; Geography; Environmental science; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.034616827203602145,"score_gpt":0.299403084550472,"score_spread":0.26478625734686984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409707895","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.251395,0.10726071,0.0039264867,0.39520222,0.0014153206,0.00028375845,0.00165252,0.00013928385,0.23872477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95720667,0.025236031,0.0016624795,0.007630904,0.00009317517,0.000052331623,0.00024255428,0.000025219886,0.007850624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923469,0.0016095592,0.00027527148,0.00048543443,0.0027834328,0.0024994041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96718127,0.0054336637,0.0017904912,0.0010515068,0.018479899,0.0060631987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009740174,0.00021365152,0.00060555746,0.0051751425,0.013507823,0.011244417,0.0021129085,0.0018718285,0.0035199765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024653248,0.00039201337,0.0005307007,0.010697193,0.008891873,0.004480557,0.0036717155,0.0036787519,0.00015928494],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108411354,0.000069830945,0.05908073,0.0008346124,0.00011755468,0.00074965874,0.02336569,0.0014150776,0.00021913358,0.70943624,0.07881029,0.12579285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010097726,0.000078347875,0.24712633,0.004911913,0.0002903214,0.00038767612,0.064428285,0.0040546246,0.0005963508,0.07127855,0.60649294,0.00025362425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99719644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28280875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.28280875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.46787524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83184016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409824887","doi":"10.1017/9781009010078","title":"The Impasse of Constitutional Rights","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.018715588462045355,"score_gpt":0.2360838881387498,"score_spread":0.21736829967670446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409824887","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016398905,0.02082553,0.023498975,0.16017044,0.0013784184,0.00003661078,0.000112505535,0.00008525789,0.7774934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86362123,0.013659677,0.006753822,0.019557133,0.0033672813,0.0002246232,0.00012001105,0.00020523785,0.092490934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9814299,0.010111612,0.00043999415,0.0020503234,0.0048466194,0.0011214882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875616,0.008673964,0.00038912395,0.001842227,0.0010175171,0.0005155948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014604747,0.00045548606,0.0007831559,0.0017114704,0.006093997,0.014289581,0.0015230182,0.004562916,0.006857978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024258664,0.00046958218,0.0004644764,0.0014596774,0.07229946,0.02232321,0.0069475453,0.012479582,0.0015960246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.388883e-7,0.0000013046167,0.000013146729,0.000005270613,5.9729024e-7,0.000008248294,0.0004622102,0.000020333508,0.0000105550525,0.9969619,0.0010340916,0.0014815277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005048366,0.000004554129,0.00004292936,0.00006124754,0.0000014557176,0.000023817438,0.0005579551,0.00008564124,0.00004230381,0.94430256,0.054869074,0.0000034011468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035314888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024944309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014604747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009143535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066004028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0772382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409910943","doi":"10.1017/cls.2024.29","title":"The Chambers List Is Long Today and Every Day: A Qualitative Exploration of the Potentiality of Person-Centred Justice in Vancouver’s Supreme Court of British Columbia","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.03469309548954022,"score_gpt":0.28211285861897023,"score_spread":0.24741976312943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409910943","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9687043,0.0008976713,0.0009796777,0.0044423593,0.000049250688,0.0001911165,0.00026438746,0.000012008286,0.024459297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942305,0.00038952538,0.00036170054,0.00051258726,0.000004284865,0.00008711743,0.00006361108,0.000017053813,0.004333723],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900087,0.006082455,0.0002000391,0.00076885987,0.0014742091,0.0014658095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830973,0.01062377,0.00073245825,0.0005222696,0.002789259,0.002234919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0078123733,0.0003630603,0.00078455417,0.0027534557,0.030478146,0.010255749,0.002708615,0.0016573195,0.005855279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013812463,0.0006718958,0.00021871619,0.0048589967,0.023748998,0.0026380771,0.006017369,0.003666524,0.00029587615],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016715769,0.000024788176,0.0037865234,0.00008215527,0.00000452082,0.00067026133,0.9870826,0.0000685606,0.0003364667,0.0035601961,0.0009989497,0.0033682194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017482123,0.0000065233075,0.0026214363,0.00011060772,0.0000024805486,0.0000362175,0.9909237,0.00005764949,0.000053475942,0.00031778967,0.005857002,0.000011438742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9247614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9718416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.075238585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07334909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0712072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53218734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410002500","doi":"10.21991/cf29489","title":"A Kick in the Caboose: Recovering the Judicial Horizontality of Constitutional Equality Rights","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02899769913866132,"score_gpt":0.3149318039569513,"score_spread":0.28593410481828996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410002500","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2197611,0.0046296176,0.14638358,0.1292378,0.0014115854,0.00017642857,0.00018758797,0.00020457155,0.49800768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96761996,0.0008704468,0.012680028,0.004599704,0.00025225856,0.000063525265,0.00005077191,0.00007046951,0.013792889],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99391514,0.0022552458,0.00013915038,0.0008471157,0.0016295579,0.0012138677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842704,0.009243146,0.00087695004,0.0036762764,0.0013830587,0.0005501915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010263583,0.00029832456,0.000839238,0.0019103831,0.008538556,0.008716533,0.0016745947,0.004723899,0.010201637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03179823,0.0005593221,0.0005095182,0.0019762998,0.03729272,0.01427476,0.007593678,0.011542699,0.000566651],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068385148,0.00000629294,0.00023330069,0.000010050586,0.0000021623753,0.000036607584,0.0013785517,0.00011482668,0.00009092317,0.99188274,0.0012371554,0.005000563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028736322,0.000023823248,0.0009955422,0.00018523783,0.000011595253,0.000062727595,0.0050099026,0.0013040912,0.0007869677,0.9487399,0.042822246,0.000029106435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03311293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047283683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03311293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006064373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01295528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06584042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410080155","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5199576","title":"Candour in Judicial Review Proceedings in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Judicial review; Law; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.014153808235025942,"score_gpt":0.28370365630391464,"score_spread":0.2695498480688887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410080155","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6809267,0.0067453273,0.0008883045,0.07359175,0.00059139985,0.00021385487,0.0010301791,0.000094719755,0.23591776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759161,0.0007385061,0.00017380434,0.0026101987,0.00007978034,0.00002426959,0.00008366786,0.000024978406,0.020348664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97673106,0.0034620375,0.00065934996,0.0016364442,0.0065945373,0.010916555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9261547,0.029493188,0.0052215667,0.001391121,0.02386343,0.013876092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012870645,0.00032977868,0.0014197155,0.0052987477,0.0353639,0.01725368,0.0032207018,0.0072835316,0.014936052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.087027,0.0007545048,0.0006234142,0.009495588,0.009813806,0.0029240712,0.00406785,0.007956001,0.000649871],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012753557,0.00054972444,0.14288716,0.00043822042,0.0003415456,0.0023925328,0.03815863,0.006579249,0.0006942822,0.54360586,0.18602584,0.07705158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006009164,0.00032649783,0.4671729,0.0011717946,0.00058865047,0.00047888703,0.09601215,0.009640249,0.0018614725,0.096119426,0.32530612,0.0007209065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9909332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20962977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20962977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31912118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9167174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410138015","doi":"10.1177/13540688251339622","title":"Does it matter who is in charge? Ministerial characteristics and pledge fulfilment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Party Politics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pledge; Charge (physics); Political science; Physics; Law; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.023262226030495554,"score_gpt":0.30920622982466744,"score_spread":0.2859440037941719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410138015","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9804041,0.00016854968,0.00050409,0.0013367455,0.000029392964,0.000022250286,0.00009019165,0.000015674452,0.017429028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984145,0.00004449062,0.00007749289,0.000054638043,0.0000081663975,0.0000042815745,0.000040851817,0.000005569116,0.0013499806],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99684286,0.0010696827,0.00024997751,0.00025136233,0.0005125943,0.0010734877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9752206,0.008164213,0.0074508907,0.0012093199,0.0015015678,0.006453364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045729135,0.00008073287,0.0002966659,0.0007207285,0.0016151528,0.0037606764,0.000511824,0.00060095865,0.0087714065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034029685,0.00019108136,0.00025346817,0.00095886167,0.0017647292,0.001606342,0.0012573968,0.0014258404,0.0014175592],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006322805,0.0004243291,0.8933264,0.00015136114,0.00009430404,0.00036000172,0.031756043,0.0007293369,0.0017309993,0.01213287,0.004641429,0.0540208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026090353,0.00012536239,0.95246536,0.00005645301,0.000018025321,0.00022418791,0.031012338,0.00040878088,0.00037623695,0.0018880127,0.013361121,0.000038002243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011439086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023323659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011439086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019034983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015547962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029343307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410158590","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i1.1717","title":"Judicial Review of Rulemaking","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Rulemaking; Political science; Judicial review; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.030213038833962876,"score_gpt":0.344318470434393,"score_spread":0.31410543160043014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410158590","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014315966,0.050907843,0.043567494,0.19599134,0.020772887,0.0010913422,0.00064889813,0.00054415915,0.6721601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51617914,0.032833,0.034799796,0.13271731,0.022610338,0.00122834,0.0009770008,0.00047615878,0.25817892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9231926,0.024447555,0.0066917343,0.007986453,0.03190583,0.0057757534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85913706,0.06456818,0.004319534,0.01570583,0.052476823,0.0037926084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06503052,0.0005073528,0.001414874,0.004486276,0.006370844,0.00969906,0.0034318308,0.009899041,0.008092172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15383346,0.0007873999,0.0010053148,0.0025980177,0.009750988,0.0041722134,0.0037935006,0.013548633,0.0028144927],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039345738,0.000041694893,0.0007587544,0.0002833347,0.000044802706,0.00030814263,0.0019821266,0.00048152154,0.0007709614,0.7166954,0.21421117,0.064382754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004018321,0.0000440679,0.0012261595,0.00068022014,0.000037559825,0.00010915672,0.00048469676,0.000670397,0.00069836486,0.111294374,0.88465375,0.00006112325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020473178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030429384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06503052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01184742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037980348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34391838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410450760","doi":"10.1177/00031224251333087","title":"Frame Backfire: The Trouble with Civil Rights Appeals in the Contemporary United States","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Civil rights; Frame (networking); Political science; Law; Political economy; Criminology; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.050714674342801705,"score_gpt":0.35649512454922794,"score_spread":0.30578045020642625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410450760","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93448204,0.00067189906,0.0013623869,0.022771327,0.00016333081,0.000069102054,0.00003875076,0.000044129294,0.040397096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99499196,0.000169542,0.0003494454,0.0034013223,0.000051164378,0.00004918976,0.000019261184,0.00001545317,0.0009527325],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9819276,0.012788027,0.0003657278,0.0012156933,0.002220715,0.0014823134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95087427,0.036302995,0.004393545,0.00353659,0.0031983794,0.0016942169],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030960305,0.00025774114,0.00052509236,0.0015113746,0.012865335,0.0089556575,0.0017675218,0.0041563325,0.0056391056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.067215085,0.000532956,0.0003962381,0.0013536343,0.012912065,0.0091057345,0.0073628873,0.005721174,0.00037289213],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063889846,0.0018388943,0.07200473,0.0002780719,0.000089934896,0.0005756967,0.6724165,0.0005426793,0.0021690854,0.08313682,0.016381886,0.14992678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016325893,0.00074355875,0.08935752,0.0009932168,0.00014690367,0.00020180078,0.78206503,0.0023331575,0.0020472442,0.04296415,0.07880886,0.00017523963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039768822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050882056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039768822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00597621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043412503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16373569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410462573","doi":"10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i03.44967","title":"CONSTITUTIONALISM IN INDIA: A COMPARATIVE STUDY","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Medicine; Political science; Law; Democracy","score_opus":0.2157722951052258,"score_gpt":0.5652989592671241,"score_spread":0.34952666416189837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410462573","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.218681,0.025529003,0.00054481503,0.0046767057,0.00018894057,0.00004955434,0.00035083052,0.000032775446,0.7499465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9751118,0.015727408,0.00018404823,0.00035386105,0.00016402842,0.00002762895,0.00017426,0.000019272835,0.008237758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980736,0.0005769598,0.00010256568,0.00017722776,0.00048194223,0.00058761373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958806,0.002860891,0.0003657975,0.00021184287,0.00037976788,0.0003011221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013044017,0.0002120353,0.00041993667,0.00792355,0.008131286,0.0069476496,0.0010173047,0.00076921046,0.01182637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003434668,0.00020737947,0.00037555455,0.025446048,0.008505193,0.0026115954,0.0023893816,0.0023681351,0.00057864736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010906436,0.00014237512,0.012070713,0.0006264082,0.00003391883,0.0014996342,0.07047858,0.0003670042,0.00030439766,0.8530595,0.0076880553,0.05362038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029377457,0.00014732822,0.14894783,0.0008290173,0.000096448144,0.0018419198,0.12922637,0.00040235315,0.00052480947,0.028116008,0.68976,0.0000785098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03462345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04503051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03462345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013470051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005529005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.097732544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410508113","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2025.6","title":"Political Legitimacy, Judicial Review, and the Legislative Override","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"University of Waterloo","keywords":"Legitimacy; Legislature; Politics; Political science; Judicial review; Law and economics; Law; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.016584028814165323,"score_gpt":0.3208468177391687,"score_spread":0.30426278892500336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410508113","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14825743,0.0036787982,0.045018747,0.121364094,0.0007037185,0.00025809347,0.00007291812,0.00013899524,0.6805071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873788,0.0002704062,0.0041528307,0.0026079116,0.0002522863,0.00007998446,0.000011965884,0.000027889946,0.00521805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.91335565,0.040421195,0.0028391066,0.0067514195,0.03152451,0.005108194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75727844,0.17558803,0.017162908,0.015396844,0.029903704,0.0046699923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.059575494,0.000207744,0.0009822494,0.00511239,0.010273251,0.014972418,0.002014953,0.0066578845,0.0043271855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15133642,0.0006843931,0.00050849444,0.0024331291,0.0444924,0.0073466892,0.0063305325,0.0076587177,0.00049712864],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007616044,0.00001829311,0.0007276879,0.000013720036,0.0000052741016,0.00003394521,0.00087611953,0.00017868543,0.00009135659,0.99370956,0.00090650574,0.0034312215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001182369,0.000044091194,0.0032011447,0.00022652188,0.000038133774,0.00010552696,0.0011351083,0.002890285,0.0010579999,0.9510485,0.040081996,0.000052498137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01984847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026077932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059575494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015027305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026843224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31506914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411157373","doi":"10.1017/s0008423925000034","title":"Notwithstanding Centralism: The Resurgence of the Notwithstanding Clause and the Conservative Provincial Rights Movement","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Centralized government; Movement (music); Political science; Political economy; Law; Economics; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.020952680074354153,"score_gpt":0.291062601205534,"score_spread":0.2701099211311799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411157373","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9528138,0.00080764777,0.0005032444,0.009671664,0.00006108367,0.000024851837,0.0008982654,0.000015529486,0.03520388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99807394,0.00013768309,0.00006701376,0.00031841404,0.000015589512,0.0000032070056,0.00019445668,0.0000056437784,0.0011839924],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952479,0.0006376146,0.00014587078,0.0004952659,0.0019134396,0.0015599236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97361034,0.009277973,0.008655377,0.0014073885,0.0049891123,0.002059833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004848303,0.00009807218,0.0004587605,0.0024500953,0.00539435,0.00500539,0.0010026471,0.0009297596,0.00550414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027543955,0.00014520742,0.00020632075,0.005802716,0.0074748974,0.001424125,0.0020088188,0.0029733544,0.00021072105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003542519,0.00012715276,0.67211396,0.00013468678,0.00009344913,0.0012012748,0.04959878,0.0012099035,0.001072549,0.17055905,0.037126575,0.06640838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003929604,0.00003707624,0.8759997,0.00024106614,0.00006685463,0.00021658752,0.042362086,0.001830901,0.00074579596,0.01712369,0.06126869,0.00006831425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8656864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9121424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13431358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02061411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02185425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27020913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411622319","doi":"10.1017/s0008423925000186","title":"Constraining the Court: Judicial Power and Policy Implementation in the Charter EraJames B. Kelly , Vancouver: UBC Press, 2024, pp. 448","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Power (physics); Law and economics; Sociology; Physics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.01764598244167476,"score_gpt":0.33384840164320106,"score_spread":0.3162024192015263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411622319","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016487103,0.14637025,0.002612037,0.4677508,0.0015345565,0.00004439967,0.00028806282,0.0000839831,0.36482885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8185386,0.06205727,0.002767133,0.0221625,0.0011595457,0.00007977574,0.0001792226,0.00014610407,0.09290991],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870804,0.0063602696,0.000296142,0.0005787279,0.003611042,0.0020734335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98776776,0.0074192905,0.00052767847,0.00035792624,0.0029738683,0.00095338875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012696596,0.00042026903,0.00059592456,0.0016828568,0.010645066,0.017177505,0.001883946,0.007206055,0.009993982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03114481,0.0005666029,0.00020343492,0.004038402,0.020989932,0.0047675148,0.0026875853,0.0069237207,0.0015196146],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003685808,0.000022889477,0.000868708,0.00015663945,0.000010626075,0.00014463284,0.007881589,0.0011032029,0.00024452075,0.7353155,0.20008619,0.054128706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040483945,0.000018394907,0.012490267,0.0018256744,0.00002897808,0.00006947934,0.016586035,0.000801335,0.00038698583,0.3398799,0.62779844,0.00007404598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.60906976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8028428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39093024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04121476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.070951395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.786465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411656908","doi":"10.51847/gfj4hqxfly","title":"10.51847/Gfj4HQxflY","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Administrative court; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.01334517138857484,"score_gpt":0.2280520539463514,"score_spread":0.21470688255777656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411656908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00060157635,0.00019933768,0.00079383136,0.00093948503,0.00040237338,0.000099747616,0.0016377708,0.0016604655,0.99366534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020423888,0.000117115625,0.00044459305,0.0006518603,0.000057964775,0.00005899466,0.0011337809,0.00042741076,0.9950658],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993562,0.00008903991,0.00003439824,0.00016124459,0.00023246938,0.00012668502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912196,0.00017148528,0.000041938958,0.00018897053,0.00026634228,0.00020928805],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00102832,0.0012674334,0.0007034731,0.0025081208,0.0017751362,0.0035790661,0.0014490823,0.0037477128,0.9756708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016332602,0.00039043467,0.0006812588,0.0017795295,0.0014188098,0.002390107,0.0037038745,0.0015291293,0.9754671],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011931148,0.00016101358,0.0009849705,0.00029652828,0.0000083162695,0.00022532849,0.0001854514,0.00013012334,0.0013201188,0.00915525,0.57759464,0.40981892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026463773,0.000028237,0.00078734814,0.00016023537,0.00000343505,0.00015312865,0.00012815933,0.00008415312,0.00017276256,0.0015700859,0.9968741,0.000012016655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004296266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004059943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024329185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012548437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010493961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03470254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411724707","doi":"10.1093/icon/moaf021","title":"Chief justices and democratic resilience: Judicial leadership in times of constitutional crisis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Resilience (materials science); Political science; Law; Political economy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.04276085852462981,"score_gpt":0.3309494178866684,"score_spread":0.2881885593620386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411724707","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12501322,0.025732404,0.0023791518,0.60353875,0.0072525204,0.000046307054,0.000049653023,0.00009738905,0.23589055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9640074,0.0038142353,0.00027518085,0.017160408,0.0020338825,0.000029834084,0.00001619907,0.000042963296,0.012619887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870162,0.007299588,0.00025661255,0.00086350425,0.0010146436,0.0035495353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98774976,0.0051985662,0.0014244247,0.00046844553,0.0008242405,0.004334622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01092346,0.00033454382,0.00044604723,0.00212255,0.022787044,0.02265874,0.0020775453,0.0051702545,0.0075549386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020485898,0.00041188597,0.00037883938,0.0019366662,0.040391397,0.011485676,0.013110969,0.0105012385,0.0006339191],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052901192,0.000048955615,0.0026024445,0.00012301198,0.000018751123,0.001095129,0.19592075,0.00026678538,0.00015622188,0.68813825,0.08328893,0.02828786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003976928,0.0000478432,0.004410981,0.0003600936,0.000012748268,0.00034791458,0.26328754,0.00036808377,0.00014964418,0.17555949,0.5553526,0.000063192376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008353428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0180981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022787044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0101343235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0119633805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07353002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411921775","doi":"10.17473/2240-7987-2025-1-2","title":"Ferrara’s Principles of Constitutional Legitimacy: From Plato to Rawls, and Backwards?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Filosofia e questioni pubbliche.","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Legitimacy; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.03997018694438847,"score_gpt":0.32346847533443523,"score_spread":0.28349828839004676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411921775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02247862,0.068729036,0.12157631,0.23322889,0.0029196371,0.00011470586,0.00021503144,0.00022393664,0.5505139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.900809,0.017098363,0.029097468,0.019228343,0.0047915336,0.00032096775,0.00008471149,0.00017879475,0.02839095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938226,0.0030058927,0.0003101529,0.00088761584,0.0015903811,0.0003833831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924948,0.0055214786,0.0004757745,0.00075456745,0.0005981149,0.00015526198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008171611,0.0005711709,0.0006927783,0.0032796615,0.0033360238,0.007004485,0.0013466259,0.0039489088,0.0025684263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017416239,0.00039462355,0.00067615794,0.0018817156,0.04310115,0.014393662,0.002784226,0.006530937,0.00052521046],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020356106,0.0000018756144,0.000031519994,0.000009666375,0.0000016364158,0.000009762474,0.00046731392,0.00003569075,0.000012614113,0.99644226,0.001134451,0.0018511475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048949455,0.000004340256,0.0000788762,0.000047056117,0.0000021274243,0.000024332854,0.00011103624,0.00012771896,0.00004310151,0.96800554,0.03154494,0.0000060149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040270695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037079505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008171611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004733172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003258239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04321617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412073517","doi":"10.7202/1118441ar","title":"Methodology for Interpreting Constitutional Legislation: Crucially Different or Much the Same?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Constitutional interpretation; Constitutional review; Law and economics; Law; Constitutional law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Constitution","score_opus":0.08724610839841461,"score_gpt":0.35390167472601364,"score_spread":0.266655566327599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412073517","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012454925,0.045838483,0.5300575,0.31787258,0.01657261,0.0007320643,0.00028469518,0.0004935491,0.07569354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3283408,0.032853067,0.54528373,0.059755128,0.013170475,0.0029887003,0.00046909455,0.0011051695,0.016033787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.79867154,0.15995993,0.008925539,0.008142304,0.021354256,0.002946392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8682027,0.07360093,0.008420728,0.025257843,0.021540169,0.0029776716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13953854,0.0012654696,0.002385451,0.007932165,0.007380434,0.025052188,0.006414923,0.007995234,0.0032456827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15064394,0.0014441003,0.00195834,0.006754126,0.08117393,0.028175881,0.0074254344,0.014744765,0.00205437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027111333,0.000035772697,0.000839862,0.0005358314,0.00007508437,0.00009005579,0.014688986,0.00022730305,0.0004984724,0.9402893,0.0062120846,0.036480214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005331822,0.00010238626,0.0015739981,0.0026868037,0.00008793103,0.00040554765,0.020436456,0.001182511,0.0011881386,0.73891306,0.23319608,0.00017379408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00999769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008001651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13953854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011718285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021518404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73795915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412190459","doi":"10.38003/ccsr.4.7-8.1","title":"Constitutional Discourses in East Asia Today","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cross-cultural studies review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"East Asia; Political science; Law; China","score_opus":0.07030696683422978,"score_gpt":0.44035243811957214,"score_spread":0.3700454712853424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412190459","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40564367,0.03873195,0.004409147,0.09784293,0.0010836213,0.000060064835,0.00020581105,0.000120158606,0.4519027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98378295,0.004551975,0.000480052,0.0029180688,0.00022632841,0.00003725361,0.00004659757,0.000014559617,0.007942114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972017,0.0013827651,0.00019904174,0.00034746915,0.00042870842,0.00044039646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969632,0.001799856,0.0003119043,0.00034992385,0.00035309562,0.00022211303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006981591,0.0004028952,0.00039148045,0.0018580997,0.008459919,0.0073481593,0.00084862683,0.0025209603,0.0033458185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004265799,0.00020782443,0.00025291077,0.002742251,0.024675073,0.008592871,0.0036548038,0.0044523682,0.00018693329],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047450285,0.000007877462,0.00045296387,0.000041676907,0.0000027761653,0.000101388476,0.05540665,0.00008775379,0.00019493127,0.9383729,0.0014164791,0.003909982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030783434,0.000052230378,0.00655602,0.00082688394,0.00003538546,0.0002626729,0.12950332,0.0008708289,0.0015425612,0.29956937,0.560679,0.000070880844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014346049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009843339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015029099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015029099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00805566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.109044254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412257729","doi":"","title":"Pierre Bourdieu's Sociology of Law:From the Genesis of the State to the Globalisation of Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology of law; Globalization; State (computer science); Law; Sociology; Social science; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05746031047779289,"score_gpt":0.3062683316807427,"score_spread":0.24880802120294981,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412257729","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034337617,0.12727046,0.019842992,0.33813357,0.0021151006,0.000034201927,0.00015949918,0.00009697808,0.4780096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9226783,0.02791139,0.005850665,0.011751906,0.0019428529,0.00006322603,0.000031871095,0.00011857932,0.029651107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99560404,0.0032186748,0.000054532222,0.00034159367,0.00042909564,0.00035214776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939433,0.005210122,0.00017831306,0.00025271304,0.00020380932,0.00021171081],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042375713,0.00069590565,0.0007192485,0.0028125113,0.0059826607,0.010150883,0.0010797282,0.0068468833,0.0028916209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060454495,0.00053026585,0.00047806342,0.003142948,0.053772476,0.009645698,0.0037943004,0.0077951266,0.00036728024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004573677,0.0000028968386,0.000036163434,0.000012951801,0.0000013024901,0.000020925158,0.0031195318,0.0001344129,0.000013539163,0.9941461,0.0016513799,0.0008562435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009166912,0.000004108201,0.0001217592,0.00008175188,0.0000024949863,0.000047794994,0.0017320918,0.00014658528,0.00007532041,0.92013574,0.0776343,0.000008879471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014936782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010973334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014936782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007919702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055018463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05746168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412266769","doi":"","title":"The Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism – a book review","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Commonwealth; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.15271988086893148,"score_gpt":0.3895895630309104,"score_spread":0.23686968216197893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412266769","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000117581534,0.987328,0.0004284521,0.0034659659,0.00064793497,0.0000061383753,0.00002775246,0.0000056081053,0.007972636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027411443,0.9927759,0.0003295207,0.0014077615,0.0006037518,0.000012554007,0.000044122353,0.00000737007,0.002077913],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883515,0.00039538724,0.00010369099,0.00011771374,0.00047403408,0.00007406179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997874,0.0016041001,0.00014981402,0.00006399757,0.00025918373,0.000048919028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019598047,0.0005452455,0.001247508,0.005218789,0.000608961,0.0034018366,0.0010971162,0.002181403,0.005801146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003987238,0.00047894512,0.00047069986,0.010243766,0.004526949,0.004281647,0.0013998883,0.0025442964,0.0016704274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003094466,0.00004645042,0.00026808376,0.00938166,0.00015159948,0.0001254147,0.0004035315,0.0007841582,0.0002010239,0.32439625,0.23927362,0.42493725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008694363,0.000011425908,0.0005402758,0.0055303723,0.000039743994,0.00014280583,0.00019056462,0.000064945394,0.000044673023,0.05145509,0.94195926,0.000012244915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062001934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010816029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062001934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028437683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069618076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020633101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412395962","doi":"10.1590/2317-6172202526","title":"Pensando o Direito e Desenvolvimento com Mariana Mota Prado: a riqueza dos acasos, dos diálogos reflexivos e das traduções que transcendem barreiras","year":2025,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Direito GV","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Logos Bible Software; Humanities; Political science; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04794805250201174,"score_gpt":0.36718948630491294,"score_spread":0.3192414338029012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412395962","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10750209,0.008907434,0.008075009,0.5708976,0.0025569324,0.00007959577,0.0000947071,0.000092079805,0.30179465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9279219,0.0015704083,0.0017757879,0.017835094,0.00051510934,0.00008289391,0.000015821095,0.00010343879,0.050179437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854977,0.008692765,0.00037371766,0.0017458318,0.0022898377,0.0014001783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97936624,0.014639319,0.0012188936,0.0018959877,0.0018079956,0.0010715702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017923933,0.00032980196,0.00057939027,0.0012661314,0.020493291,0.015942462,0.0026061533,0.012688547,0.008133098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044601724,0.00062377047,0.00043449443,0.0014426488,0.04499014,0.015458521,0.010746962,0.019211294,0.0009836489],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012246007,0.000012739954,0.00022866653,0.00004070647,0.000002865171,0.00008031575,0.072292715,0.000026787176,0.00017103515,0.91427606,0.0071381778,0.005717667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036865087,0.000046439192,0.0019719517,0.00060478173,0.000023371944,0.00020035854,0.12555581,0.0002959834,0.0011545044,0.3855798,0.48444852,0.000081629805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02026116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056545757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020493291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01083292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017926913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09479195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412561668","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5349824","title":"In Defence of Section 33: Why the Notwithstanding Clause Supports Democratic Governance and Individual Rights in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Democracy; Political science; Corporate governance; Democratic governance; Law and economics; Law; Business; Economics; Finance; Politics; Advertising","score_opus":0.012232823928792939,"score_gpt":0.25202269634030994,"score_spread":0.239789872411517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412561668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20671476,0.002027911,0.0029870952,0.31990406,0.0006918995,0.00015884067,0.0016207822,0.00010341462,0.46579126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9042972,0.0005963786,0.00090840156,0.032812975,0.000203914,0.000047453967,0.00015225467,0.000054044718,0.060927458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907574,0.00072000286,0.0002038804,0.0008465247,0.0021709073,0.0053012604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882025,0.004516308,0.0006964485,0.0006462973,0.0044148783,0.0015234954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055918545,0.00032395244,0.00075770007,0.0010118469,0.01953885,0.0127164265,0.0031156866,0.012192725,0.01895978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024974795,0.00045148746,0.0008248535,0.001980661,0.011803099,0.0035534645,0.0028577908,0.009918913,0.00087744405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056249955,0.000019403404,0.00356397,0.000034183373,0.000024278808,0.0001834627,0.0046886993,0.00046037266,0.00019289741,0.9357483,0.04993725,0.0050909254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002638002,0.00006339198,0.046751536,0.00036541856,0.00020257304,0.00017500098,0.022122651,0.0041023917,0.0019945402,0.41014418,0.5135535,0.00026094422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98949134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9911738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.074592665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.074592665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20106182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5412102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412636754","doi":"10.15290/sup.2024.08.04","title":"The Constitutional Development of Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studia Sieci Uniwersytetów Pogranicza","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.01920483588122486,"score_gpt":0.27385689368713545,"score_spread":0.2546520578059106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412636754","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04691132,0.017233782,0.004178918,0.041438796,0.00063994847,0.00015398682,0.0033168395,0.00016855919,0.8859579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8865523,0.011365981,0.005969703,0.0064953337,0.0001759879,0.000078764315,0.0013306325,0.00012273158,0.087908685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993898,0.0007078362,0.00013250271,0.0007344565,0.0029108566,0.0016164518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946615,0.00082139816,0.00019707577,0.00028475316,0.0033598056,0.00067553064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003054083,0.00029539387,0.00034063583,0.0048843627,0.016047982,0.010489402,0.0013415682,0.001358658,0.010552948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007814521,0.00027392321,0.00036200273,0.0064695585,0.0139884055,0.0018297125,0.002078538,0.003025786,0.00050324755],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009720578,0.0000055373935,0.001372924,0.00008435062,0.000010211504,0.00013499298,0.004963669,0.0004280623,0.00015107586,0.9383746,0.026525935,0.027938819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000079945785,0.000009656343,0.011379478,0.00038685,0.00001812107,0.00008379322,0.003318273,0.00040073603,0.00021015406,0.033782832,0.9503496,0.000052449905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98982155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99236465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19951814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19951814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29945272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92844546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412664356","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/sfvjk_v1","title":"Canadian Constitutional Hybridity: The Determinative Influence of Civil Law on the Supreme Court and Federal Institutions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Determinative; Supreme court; Law; Hybridity; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04729672733621472,"score_gpt":0.3095783530890245,"score_spread":0.2622816257528098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412664356","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24631244,0.009399601,0.003473842,0.04162687,0.00023592639,0.000029632522,0.00056556036,0.00006274868,0.6982934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988715,0.0015264763,0.00061486324,0.0006743716,0.000035096815,0.0000052044566,0.000063277985,0.000024673616,0.008340961],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973123,0.00045106738,0.000032374897,0.00040374795,0.0009561298,0.0008444965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963301,0.0012637629,0.0002583046,0.00021204198,0.0013367208,0.0005990089],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026581124,0.00027220027,0.0003613862,0.0039357212,0.014439761,0.008448139,0.0009507304,0.0013511395,0.006370678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00701311,0.00024220675,0.00022399011,0.005285296,0.023741083,0.003520652,0.0030271283,0.0022239138,0.00021380009],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022624625,0.0000039047486,0.0035720542,0.00002717592,0.000009542338,0.000109981585,0.015520055,0.00030786087,0.00019745532,0.963281,0.0043791253,0.012569195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032144708,0.00003053811,0.086404815,0.00047418245,0.000109640525,0.00032850355,0.0559332,0.0025651178,0.0009005011,0.29636392,0.55666286,0.00019446958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98032767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.989617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8887886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11121142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10651176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8068991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412923836","doi":"10.1017/s0008423925100450","title":"Government Interventions in Constitutional Cases at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Constitutional court; Constitutional right; Public administration; Constitution","score_opus":0.035740524476969265,"score_gpt":0.31046032723759875,"score_spread":0.27471980276062946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412923836","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85905945,0.0026852773,0.0010716972,0.010736921,0.00013920125,0.00025652154,0.0011077425,0.00009099757,0.124852225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99492186,0.00031821465,0.0001907436,0.0010924904,0.00002038193,0.000036678906,0.00018322303,0.000012711057,0.003223697],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9751058,0.0034526265,0.00049977447,0.001889013,0.008219243,0.010833676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9622656,0.01224512,0.007656237,0.0014802148,0.009300057,0.007052698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066953753,0.000249693,0.0007696699,0.003591836,0.0139219,0.0062726066,0.002576342,0.0029383474,0.00592555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048905153,0.00038979054,0.000354062,0.00622939,0.008758253,0.0018665565,0.0042742207,0.0055592884,0.0003622525],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048063687,0.0006705805,0.44982132,0.0004972156,0.00025075715,0.003653486,0.070634656,0.006314973,0.0025009261,0.28238347,0.071973085,0.11081896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008865828,0.00011052531,0.7727171,0.00063818623,0.00017731918,0.00030300213,0.05184778,0.0028548273,0.0012505559,0.016793568,0.15299816,0.00022030783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9554877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9784837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.110588446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.110588446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14408168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8023791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413019677","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-98615-4_2","title":"Constitutional and Institutional Hierarchy in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Contributions to security and defence studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hierarchy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.020355095743148435,"score_gpt":0.3002001040117816,"score_spread":0.2798450082686332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413019677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06775234,0.01362158,0.0017259972,0.03536766,0.00034763376,0.000080285616,0.000928392,0.0000752518,0.8801009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76965123,0.008149772,0.0016300398,0.0033774597,0.00013142369,0.0000644385,0.00025721622,0.00009188618,0.21664655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959991,0.0004299805,0.00007848656,0.00037826036,0.001231728,0.0018825085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99647635,0.0008320219,0.00014167941,0.00014365769,0.0015880128,0.0008182485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017945434,0.000413259,0.0007594722,0.004605312,0.02723103,0.0128883,0.0023453739,0.0024414,0.018582545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00667602,0.00058491604,0.00045287155,0.012320923,0.015384189,0.002833699,0.0028422973,0.004182097,0.0006292387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011643617,0.000010420184,0.00116871,0.00003077066,0.000006087379,0.00005471702,0.003279165,0.0005947942,0.00002841276,0.9660769,0.018735921,0.01000257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041753683,0.000015230628,0.01839886,0.00043940815,0.000045720022,0.00007934239,0.018618846,0.002436479,0.00021109235,0.2691297,0.6904882,0.00009536362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.998137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99892336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7453823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.25461766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3256104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86453784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413264830","doi":"10.51244/ijrsi.2025.120700135","title":"Judicial Transparency and The Collegium System: A Critical Legal Analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of research and scientific innovation","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Legitimacy; Political science; Accountability; Judicial independence; Cornerstone; Law; Judicial reform; Democracy; Judicial review; Separation of powers; Supreme court; Public administration; Constitution","score_opus":0.05989682043102251,"score_gpt":0.44159593025394506,"score_spread":0.38169910982292254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413264830","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.093116455,0.013091405,0.09825821,0.16227923,0.0011410849,0.00045093114,0.00011796506,0.00008748755,0.63145715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98116714,0.0016976059,0.0073264185,0.004261227,0.00060706324,0.0001453385,0.000018442544,0.00004116601,0.004735622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9779158,0.013411047,0.0006590197,0.0016593037,0.004187321,0.0021674612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9336945,0.055478297,0.003314492,0.0025708617,0.0041369637,0.00080496736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035838556,0.00042128447,0.00060294574,0.0057546073,0.012434724,0.01702577,0.002010081,0.007728796,0.0029002263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04701508,0.0004026865,0.0007912476,0.004041268,0.07882372,0.014478254,0.0046552094,0.010002746,0.0002646844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014638481,0.0000023972184,0.00005852749,0.0000076215124,7.0961653e-7,0.000019939107,0.0018868725,0.00005218929,0.000012790584,0.9969555,0.00034397517,0.0006580511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015321884,0.000015206156,0.00042491418,0.00023249516,0.000010719497,0.00007315624,0.004598663,0.00091373565,0.0002509594,0.9558743,0.03757081,0.000019734573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007991245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008013472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035838556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018874656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015036567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18953466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413445748","doi":"10.1016/j.crbeha.2025.100184","title":"The lone dissenter as a non-conformist in the Supreme Court: Extension of past research, cross-cultural analysis and influence model development","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Research in Behavioral Sciences","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conformist; Supreme court; Extension (predicate logic); Law; Sociology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.27258687462626624,"score_gpt":0.5677285883142892,"score_spread":0.29514171368802294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413445748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94973654,0.00029738375,0.025871487,0.0012791952,0.000040654966,0.00025788214,0.00011016819,0.00002148988,0.022385137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992747,0.00014953234,0.0061512683,0.00006010556,0.000023079623,0.00010491798,0.000058362246,0.000008285313,0.0006973987],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958299,0.002727213,0.000108275606,0.0005298682,0.0005278165,0.00027698392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98714614,0.009211235,0.0011114959,0.0008498704,0.0011047085,0.0005765502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008785182,0.00050412037,0.0005687781,0.0026292782,0.0020039913,0.004007114,0.0013348719,0.00057419564,0.0027160766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016138261,0.00021382434,0.00088409364,0.0018350834,0.0033669695,0.0023239076,0.0024950076,0.0015598699,0.00019248464],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019019695,0.0008847304,0.5673467,0.00018147439,0.00032473684,0.0006521304,0.08991443,0.0071674,0.0005287092,0.24766526,0.001537088,0.083607234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010648004,0.00056428433,0.40609765,0.000377558,0.00042990368,0.00066077866,0.09099136,0.26794362,0.0012706202,0.21061178,0.020791933,0.00015409625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0503809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04777641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0503809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004029955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032434312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10017526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413493633","doi":"10.64628/aam.td3wpunt7","title":"Doug Ford’s political judicial appointments: Good or bad for justice and democracy?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Democracy; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.043781877180341024,"score_gpt":0.36090714055984024,"score_spread":0.3171252633794992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413493633","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0330454,0.0032595678,0.0004935892,0.8790546,0.005678396,0.00001012959,0.00006959353,0.00001622888,0.07837249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6797336,0.002123036,0.0006490486,0.22542055,0.003144763,0.000026518052,0.000033295713,0.000075144766,0.08879413],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929168,0.0028491074,0.00017337478,0.0009416601,0.0012195027,0.0018995454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9743265,0.01800267,0.00094558904,0.0007795915,0.0033794034,0.0025664032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009163854,0.0002838276,0.00045776909,0.0015406918,0.024148906,0.0096813515,0.0011305851,0.010648627,0.008438434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03425909,0.0003971533,0.00024311044,0.0015525654,0.018375868,0.007540354,0.0017315289,0.013206022,0.00085023354],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006495513,0.000050106384,0.0025690019,0.00004323034,0.000015595831,0.00019201248,0.013508517,0.00010841326,0.000080171936,0.40068606,0.562936,0.019745896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008528987,0.000048547878,0.007595799,0.00034338215,0.000038666116,0.00024411977,0.04970353,0.00025933952,0.00074541627,0.13135505,0.8094683,0.00011259829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19330004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4339178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0141103165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01274937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38434982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413549780","doi":"10.64628/aam.9ar4j9s9e","title":"Trump and Johnson are leading the attack against the rule of law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Rule of law; Political science","score_opus":0.04317283547275014,"score_gpt":0.3025194935973587,"score_spread":0.25934665812460855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413549780","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023242643,0.0056639635,0.0028532445,0.93595177,0.009264777,0.000031208816,0.00005481906,0.000053782147,0.043802228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15395524,0.0043055615,0.006756199,0.7714841,0.018407108,0.00018268975,0.000055095312,0.00015839576,0.044695705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98413014,0.0065309578,0.0007221931,0.0017875243,0.0051078005,0.0017213823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95966387,0.028642274,0.0022547517,0.0020627698,0.0059375176,0.0014388498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016953215,0.0009255326,0.0020622194,0.0035136547,0.011728948,0.012057301,0.0041453224,0.044369493,0.0061562294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056351427,0.0007843127,0.0015287683,0.002458717,0.0312647,0.012016937,0.0046715722,0.05013157,0.0022126841],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029203127,0.000027743763,0.00019221219,0.0000477275,0.00002442632,0.00007223909,0.0012654341,0.000063757456,0.000054314005,0.81254697,0.17810526,0.0075707617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053068386,0.00003632504,0.00037320383,0.00032998883,0.000037800823,0.00008315749,0.0018719092,0.0003415655,0.00039401723,0.60475415,0.39167085,0.00005397683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015043928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021470621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044369493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005969056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0078005213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08965826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413604373","doi":"10.64628/aam.s6fps3sv5","title":"Judicial activism has had vastly different impacts in Brazil and the United States","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Judicial activism; Political economy; Judicial review; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.081282020579179,"score_gpt":0.33928571651459105,"score_spread":0.25800369593541206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413604373","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7911145,0.008239769,0.00046664043,0.020243417,0.00011728408,0.00004275437,0.0004721084,0.00001798675,0.17928557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957585,0.0010996709,0.000056204193,0.0007974393,0.00004710326,0.0000068164377,0.00005603935,0.0000067243272,0.0021714058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749076,0.00087559246,0.00007365942,0.00025657666,0.000508605,0.0007948499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991723,0.0043385965,0.0015121051,0.000368646,0.0011394229,0.0009182032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003329207,0.00017549572,0.0004016931,0.0026625493,0.0034115352,0.004664051,0.00055659,0.0013356507,0.00424772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010343073,0.00018035667,0.00036766037,0.0034000748,0.0050256755,0.001401577,0.0023804135,0.0018240677,0.00015751133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023389517,0.00037789988,0.20058453,0.0006123228,0.00038253554,0.0009209331,0.032855615,0.0013309988,0.0043322057,0.6589442,0.011742993,0.08768181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004950525,0.00016096093,0.79653263,0.0005777876,0.00023543152,0.00015694388,0.0465775,0.0007333576,0.0020849647,0.023142084,0.12969498,0.000053841217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.102646776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26586255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.102646776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065895533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004802974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20409858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413803087","doi":"10.29173/mlj1470","title":"Charter, Constitutionality and the Honour of the Crown: Considering an Additional Constraint","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Charter; Constitution; Law; Constitutionality; Doctrine; Feudalism; Political science; Convention; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.028590209352326052,"score_gpt":0.27753488396197645,"score_spread":0.2489446746096504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413803087","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22518376,0.0034892638,0.006885343,0.06334776,0.0003611378,0.00005657345,0.00008544748,0.000029561332,0.70056117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98489827,0.00036632648,0.00060525356,0.0021054004,0.000094231094,0.000011310012,0.00001048714,0.000011713584,0.011897043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99605536,0.0009404367,0.00007885353,0.00043053576,0.0009524455,0.0015424328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99535024,0.0017542252,0.00029650272,0.0005058009,0.0013953024,0.00069794664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004568364,0.0001915593,0.00035220216,0.0009987002,0.014561024,0.010394929,0.0014136261,0.0032718657,0.003056885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009010187,0.00024241397,0.0002916808,0.0012125248,0.03691482,0.0037139338,0.0026679616,0.005152772,0.00020675044],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040027767,0.0000046522205,0.0006700565,0.00000524728,0.0000018270798,0.00006227476,0.0032911585,0.00010619268,0.00009938883,0.99305856,0.0011954136,0.0015012312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005258101,0.000053019092,0.013101698,0.00025832542,0.000040131974,0.00021429382,0.022241645,0.0013866423,0.00080216734,0.6415226,0.32025075,0.000076251796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6373366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7963322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3626634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0314498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045217436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7295984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413803101","doi":"10.29173/mlj1439","title":"Constitutional Dimensions of the Consultation and Accountability Systems within Canada’s Emergencies Act","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Principle of legality; Political science; Commission; Legitimacy; Duty; Constitutionalism; Compliance (psychology); Public administration; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Democracy; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.022387519879420007,"score_gpt":0.26997484267373284,"score_spread":0.24758732279431284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413803101","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1396878,0.0035478787,0.025412098,0.13160291,0.0005809073,0.00077847973,0.0010945523,0.00030858064,0.6969868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9715888,0.00056759315,0.0060154875,0.0060025104,0.00010151154,0.00022528881,0.00010191302,0.000028821156,0.015368083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95777214,0.009956522,0.0016547373,0.0027894853,0.017677661,0.010149466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9568407,0.020817732,0.002296008,0.0019180222,0.014128853,0.0039987103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022134226,0.00034034724,0.00059276674,0.0029426701,0.0239731,0.017150141,0.0027353012,0.0050632544,0.003364695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047568023,0.00073766825,0.00054292474,0.0030662068,0.031079542,0.0034144337,0.0045282384,0.0071108504,0.00025068483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013096175,0.000012301334,0.0018837957,0.000032552904,0.000009682104,0.00010161879,0.005342539,0.0006481402,0.00021735812,0.980569,0.005302101,0.005867936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017592247,0.00010028656,0.05825036,0.000863339,0.00026923092,0.00026014104,0.023070684,0.0070263436,0.0020457287,0.38434014,0.523041,0.0005568265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9604066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9742055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15082146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15082146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.33179846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98492676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413858327","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5401005","title":"Indigenous Justice in Bolivia and the Limits of Plurinational Constitutionalism","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Indigenous; Economic Justice; Political science; Geography; Law; Democracy; Ecology; Politics; Biology","score_opus":0.018933627731899765,"score_gpt":0.3085911406971502,"score_spread":0.28965751296525044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413858327","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68700993,0.010798698,0.0011158403,0.011779953,0.00007762748,0.00006669811,0.00015473914,0.000022341497,0.28897414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970092,0.0004177306,0.0001418351,0.00019818044,0.0000138202095,0.000013171839,0.000013152783,0.000003656927,0.002189233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99508554,0.001733483,0.00015280844,0.00038835415,0.0003300294,0.002309864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99767834,0.0011791395,0.00038348927,0.0003122057,0.00023603546,0.00021078208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046303333,0.00024329616,0.0006920825,0.0022082755,0.009281219,0.009308386,0.001313029,0.0014044123,0.003647945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006119013,0.00032063376,0.00031313128,0.0029821838,0.022672046,0.0037462192,0.0076327594,0.0035369012,0.00012334799],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061461586,0.000029781258,0.006047649,0.00011308688,0.00003159119,0.0002681727,0.026052844,0.00035743695,0.00027529596,0.9529604,0.0007386687,0.013063589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019001249,0.00020927603,0.15561043,0.0020541556,0.00025547185,0.00073198136,0.10964559,0.0015867086,0.0014422573,0.5576867,0.17046802,0.00011944288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11772142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1616881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11772142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020493431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010592184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23407245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414018354","doi":"10.1017/s0008423925100383","title":"Negative Spotlight: Event-Driven Effects on Support for the Canadian Supreme Court","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Acadia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Event (particle physics); Law; Law and economics; Economics; Physics","score_opus":0.021646520328811814,"score_gpt":0.31843019265364597,"score_spread":0.29678367232483416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414018354","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9765087,0.00018776832,0.00019367847,0.0019166728,0.000033436485,0.00007866771,0.0013089129,0.000016429496,0.019755704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971316,0.000077482975,0.000107492415,0.00019505055,0.0000107661845,0.000043204313,0.0004522853,0.000009916193,0.0019720707],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945545,0.0011913846,0.00012557462,0.00070489,0.0020448475,0.0013787723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96934646,0.012071351,0.006720308,0.0017331977,0.0057822284,0.0043464303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049405303,0.0004539404,0.000687284,0.0016397694,0.008796345,0.0054096906,0.0025310633,0.0014652997,0.01638245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038006984,0.00037265243,0.00050341163,0.0028448028,0.0040589925,0.0017981969,0.0040903185,0.003065774,0.0006587756],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00082991447,0.0008362398,0.9254064,0.00009860776,0.00018755738,0.00032935178,0.038612366,0.0006635144,0.00087899546,0.004700134,0.008749751,0.01870713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003456619,0.0000711249,0.97532904,0.000043650532,0.000047065732,0.000015382382,0.019445395,0.0005423689,0.000117182644,0.00080563844,0.003503095,0.000045491946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9583915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041608512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02610554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02914955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18940979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414126951","doi":"10.55843/isc2024conf56w","title":"DETECTING HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS THROUGH AI AND THE ROLE OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Adjudication; Fundamental rights; Transparency (behavior); Transformative learning; Corporate governance; Legal certainty; Liability; Safeguarding","score_opus":0.01882979263477651,"score_gpt":0.31504092120719956,"score_spread":0.29621112857242304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414126951","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1686747,0.010289016,0.4228784,0.15534055,0.001181454,0.0008342018,0.00044151352,0.00088674744,0.23947336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9166803,0.0020998442,0.068989396,0.006609208,0.0003064644,0.00021820507,0.00014419986,0.00008526376,0.0048671635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.927627,0.03679497,0.0046956767,0.00818741,0.018797867,0.003897089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7498519,0.18144399,0.026493398,0.016827287,0.02270231,0.0026811422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.066742286,0.000437927,0.0009542684,0.0076300036,0.0061725043,0.017176332,0.0041819126,0.008093033,0.0047366996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2052007,0.00068797276,0.0009361191,0.004098726,0.025486847,0.02637528,0.008929384,0.008640269,0.00066113827],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050193616,0.00006513183,0.023477,0.00022900425,0.000054711512,0.0010367066,0.00811447,0.0037024645,0.0010027097,0.8659515,0.0046728984,0.091643184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048942355,0.00006688198,0.007532627,0.0011557266,0.00009336871,0.0010801114,0.00784045,0.02230173,0.0034403868,0.87962186,0.07667035,0.00014746211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01910514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015485266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.066742286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0079570925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018935142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35297114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414143493","doi":"10.47577/tssj.v75i1.13153","title":"Doctrinal Legal Research in Common Law: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Technium Social Sciences Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Empirical legal studies; Relevance (law); Interpretation (philosophy); Legal research; Foundation (evidence); Empirical research; Strengths and weaknesses; Legal realism; Legal doctrine","score_opus":0.08203748198966203,"score_gpt":0.438017178647538,"score_spread":0.35597969665787593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414143493","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061263744,0.2801242,0.09030698,0.40430138,0.0029338102,0.00020871335,0.000118159835,0.000112117035,0.16063096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8795073,0.059690442,0.027130732,0.027078072,0.0022936051,0.00027252734,0.000068437905,0.00010327707,0.003855555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9502157,0.037443474,0.0014618156,0.0021341215,0.007371281,0.0013736624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9099837,0.075717606,0.003353378,0.004420694,0.0046419916,0.001882661],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043313034,0.00060494774,0.0014042157,0.009170055,0.013588535,0.026142748,0.00246433,0.007395348,0.0022259844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051814605,0.00069170666,0.0006331595,0.0085903285,0.11529908,0.029735101,0.010234743,0.010532593,0.0004118116],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037275613,0.000012271515,0.0002364421,0.00016390161,0.0000041880053,0.000038166225,0.015032916,0.00009363232,0.00004703955,0.97361857,0.0012031379,0.009545984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006843349,0.000028065597,0.00085529964,0.0027219863,0.000010698844,0.00015381136,0.026045483,0.00058736705,0.00014746696,0.8865127,0.08290762,0.0000226883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007544831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008617511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043313034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015515284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01577737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22906399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414560045","doi":"10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i05.56517","title":"Right to Die in Constitutional Jurisprudence: An Indian Perspective with Comparative Dimensions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Right to die; Dignity; Perspective (graphical); Human rights; Slippery slope; Death with dignity","score_opus":0.1268754531048172,"score_gpt":0.5317548468186317,"score_spread":0.40487939371381454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414560045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08078284,0.02650763,0.0068639973,0.029815601,0.00042592324,0.000053946846,0.00007130444,0.000021075019,0.8554576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98549575,0.006083918,0.0011307767,0.0019131413,0.00026605205,0.000042957305,0.00002031882,0.000014983531,0.005032073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895319,0.0068446705,0.0002625432,0.00039694447,0.001616653,0.001347302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99049276,0.0071375784,0.0006059476,0.0006285518,0.00073176046,0.00040337013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070693423,0.0003224571,0.00069261465,0.0061289617,0.011490604,0.014446562,0.0013003994,0.0029399474,0.0034935607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010736348,0.00025166478,0.0005307002,0.008472039,0.04389537,0.0074195145,0.0057019563,0.0066900244,0.00024861356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003738541,0.000007587911,0.000110134926,0.000023345012,0.0000017477145,0.000069564114,0.009635087,0.00006644124,0.000037854188,0.98805714,0.00024971642,0.0017376457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015243954,0.00010236654,0.004729146,0.00087391696,0.000053100473,0.0007779155,0.070820466,0.0009859033,0.00050877844,0.7162836,0.20478266,0.00006683032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019943729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022827867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019943729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012064567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007316016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.087534904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414833931","doi":"10.29173/alr2850","title":"Rules, Principles, and the Reformation of Judicial Review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Legitimacy; Judicial review; Judicial opinion; Normative; Dismissal; Administrative law; Realm","score_opus":0.025367818833001304,"score_gpt":0.3117849208431361,"score_spread":0.28641710201013476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414833931","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036936615,0.036537685,0.13888267,0.19600447,0.0030260473,0.00033740466,0.00013172156,0.00027651212,0.5878669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8990326,0.008493533,0.037311323,0.01847421,0.0038741245,0.00053865556,0.00006754769,0.00014481813,0.032063328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93650836,0.035186205,0.00352433,0.006856458,0.014054712,0.003869811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94560057,0.034245435,0.004092734,0.0076248185,0.007429128,0.001007397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05549299,0.00035769588,0.0010630115,0.003547968,0.0059312973,0.015214211,0.002662452,0.007787471,0.0015188898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07399597,0.00079390086,0.00084200624,0.0020072202,0.054638576,0.009506609,0.0042993776,0.009353667,0.00060737826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017034083,0.0000030762776,0.00003262404,0.000011649612,0.000002205823,0.000008567705,0.00026742616,0.0002470306,0.00001898457,0.9959489,0.0008726555,0.0025851452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018909312,0.00001373562,0.00016099992,0.000090836664,0.0000048807915,0.000027054379,0.00015428643,0.0006367519,0.00010528016,0.9546021,0.04416754,0.000017510501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0106852455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0090483865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98931473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013551781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017721958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29347843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414833959","doi":"10.29173/alr2855","title":"Deference and the Administrative-Legislative Paradox in Judicial Review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Jurisprudence; Judicial review; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Standard of review; Administrative law; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.04361788546437659,"score_gpt":0.36981678171471516,"score_spread":0.3261988962503386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414833959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63633335,0.03588019,0.01096887,0.13054515,0.00054949836,0.000058586495,0.00004478914,0.000054765133,0.18556477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938812,0.0013615061,0.00034102114,0.0025442296,0.0002448357,0.000010705391,0.0000049139694,0.0000050025706,0.0016066132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9645006,0.019576207,0.0010090662,0.0020813956,0.010672825,0.0021600067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9055251,0.07353468,0.0076027378,0.002335649,0.0074081407,0.0035936793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030421477,0.00014375892,0.0006197323,0.00329506,0.0057012048,0.0050352416,0.0008328247,0.0023071112,0.001820722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11256038,0.00026055955,0.00020048316,0.0025726806,0.018349206,0.0041874503,0.0029535117,0.0028558415,0.00014998965],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070767164,0.000076346914,0.013196824,0.000117580224,0.00003331452,0.00052606803,0.01366367,0.0011885697,0.00046097036,0.92799395,0.0047877072,0.037884265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008862894,0.0001402111,0.04538435,0.00031965505,0.000040931514,0.0007282263,0.00880053,0.001947303,0.0004151276,0.8625496,0.079517975,0.00006749882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017646324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024986947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9823537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008315881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01141666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16088611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414833984","doi":"10.29173/alr2854","title":"Process, Substance, and Judicial Review's (A)symmetry","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Alberta","keywords":"Judicial review; Administrative law; Subject (documents); Substantive law; Legislature; Public law; Common law; Compliance (psychology); Citizenship","score_opus":0.017310051391140873,"score_gpt":0.33159391454085657,"score_spread":0.3142838631497157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414833984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025041284,0.013358281,0.20480205,0.12610446,0.003788507,0.0013313949,0.0003807089,0.00043112575,0.6247623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85091364,0.005126754,0.0672675,0.02359422,0.0042676707,0.0018367395,0.00010057143,0.00015850317,0.046734486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.88130784,0.053546723,0.0088695735,0.011442948,0.040712178,0.004120703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84752524,0.10198232,0.007772578,0.023249578,0.017679276,0.0017910562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10655574,0.0003725581,0.001291487,0.0035923494,0.0050990246,0.017741093,0.0032079252,0.010052402,0.005766471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15925753,0.0008741948,0.0011631764,0.0022840428,0.03693744,0.011564907,0.006602586,0.0077193263,0.001654577],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067581145,0.0000062872396,0.00009869869,0.000028216202,0.0000069899907,0.000019692881,0.00037259725,0.00016384815,0.00006256117,0.99235183,0.001939042,0.00494359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009740888,0.00005935227,0.0005467151,0.0002264697,0.000022528438,0.00008716093,0.0001844305,0.0013336551,0.00039429538,0.9403535,0.056658223,0.000036233247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008420818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005633838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10655574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0087798815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024950977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56352735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414957217","doi":"10.21991/cf29493","title":"Editors’ Introduction: Responsive Judicial Review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Constitutional review; Legislation; Constitution; Judicial opinion; Public policy","score_opus":0.016730526873929313,"score_gpt":0.3061496900456219,"score_spread":0.2894191631716926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414957217","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005594454,0.012725367,0.0007874588,0.08165827,0.89646554,0.000033340064,0.00007835906,0.00008303903,0.008112693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016058745,0.008487476,0.00066310813,0.065663695,0.9035545,0.00006647648,0.00008590341,0.00011916048,0.019753708],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98114955,0.0055993367,0.0018785162,0.0024221567,0.007856107,0.0010942669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9474351,0.025594302,0.0030656753,0.002209229,0.017160952,0.004534751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013166621,0.0020014474,0.0017303894,0.0044795,0.0034935675,0.01123969,0.003352668,0.010367458,0.023566145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056241956,0.00082861475,0.0016711679,0.002698887,0.0034692744,0.0060384227,0.0031417278,0.016972067,0.014768267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010561313,0.000008672714,0.000018798939,0.00016927971,0.000004973657,0.000030196301,0.00003514262,0.000032144162,0.000036502977,0.0038389724,0.98627263,0.009541994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009670305,0.000018380282,0.00012929067,0.00033758782,0.000006069717,0.00005466592,0.000046371406,0.000067534434,0.000038333965,0.0041964375,0.9950826,0.000013014878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012314791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020536117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023566145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00433451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005424283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07883662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414957225","doi":"10.21991/cf29499","title":"Responsive Judicial Review in Canada: Reflections on the Notwithstanding Clause and Beyond","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Scope (computer science); Constitutional review; Judicial opinion; Judicial activism; Constitutional law; Constitution","score_opus":0.03875688112898575,"score_gpt":0.32320262861898413,"score_spread":0.2844457474899984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414957225","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006213267,0.019046267,0.0018965458,0.8539379,0.0032125781,0.00009350932,0.00012023953,0.00006711967,0.115412585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43816963,0.023544256,0.0034838126,0.47190905,0.0038489446,0.0002157992,0.00013579932,0.00016324072,0.058529403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8972781,0.021762261,0.0022883988,0.0061232643,0.0445902,0.0279578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8712818,0.066201635,0.0037050503,0.0026681959,0.043223243,0.0129200015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05628491,0.00083121646,0.002024998,0.0043376903,0.05843373,0.030790705,0.008266792,0.0285986,0.008998806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12844716,0.0011380607,0.0016225352,0.0068793194,0.043793462,0.009357627,0.008694382,0.032752793,0.0007628883],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004307324,0.000029304903,0.0006915786,0.00018861998,0.000032934782,0.0003793924,0.009751491,0.00063541,0.0001701623,0.84102255,0.12906387,0.017991604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013400841,0.00004900513,0.0051380624,0.0010345763,0.000096751384,0.00018480344,0.01628042,0.0012386899,0.00046208332,0.15739551,0.81760687,0.0003792857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99075365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9927475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.27698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.52546036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8386007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414957232","doi":"10.21991/cf29494","title":"Living Dead Constitutionalism or Why Old Constitutional Worlds Are Never Lost for Good: A Comment on Rosalind Dixon’s Responsive Judicial Review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Charter; Constitutional theory; Normative; Section (typography); Articulation (sociology); Judicial review; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.03886540404702162,"score_gpt":0.327677094621816,"score_spread":0.2888116905747944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414957232","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020716386,0.007922405,0.00081268983,0.9466049,0.0027044592,0.000014926327,0.00003443185,0.000028514101,0.03980597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1580913,0.006761364,0.0010900975,0.804377,0.0042569134,0.000064466054,0.000030123741,0.000111927875,0.025216853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95468783,0.014207675,0.0010875164,0.005648955,0.01936287,0.005005107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9374571,0.04535397,0.0013099117,0.0015028218,0.012463305,0.00191291],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03653258,0.00063408556,0.0012748531,0.002066521,0.028671445,0.019478252,0.0068056495,0.029274076,0.0034558186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0771703,0.00074034155,0.0010514174,0.003763082,0.054008804,0.012019077,0.004964506,0.039624177,0.0007495961],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012002517,0.0000059505796,0.00009839853,0.000051928888,0.0000059161985,0.00012331753,0.005873236,0.0001007857,0.000053199394,0.8511958,0.1391873,0.003292057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003489964,0.00001587309,0.0005620273,0.0004282995,0.000021737304,0.00013922683,0.00859795,0.0003249783,0.00031074107,0.12157336,0.86786854,0.00012244731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6836506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7059518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6836506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06888085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.092822015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63642484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414985682","doi":"10.21128/1812-7126-2025-3-26-49","title":"Constitutional review bodies’ orders to enact legislation: an introduction to the issue","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sravnitel noe konstitucionnoe obozrenie","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Jurisprudence; Constitution; Constitutional court; Legislation; Legislature; Legal research; Constitutional law; Economic Justice; Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.0244080267970746,"score_gpt":0.33267507361578275,"score_spread":0.30826704681870815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414985682","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020101175,0.4386538,0.017162453,0.29727128,0.04190396,0.00019651298,0.00026000812,0.00020609748,0.2023358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09955737,0.50974894,0.02319075,0.12109639,0.09964761,0.00047823743,0.0006754566,0.00052885193,0.14507644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9814432,0.007525545,0.0014097148,0.0017222391,0.0069774967,0.0009218217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96368176,0.025865784,0.001282173,0.0019564438,0.006280108,0.00093370804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014945533,0.0005059634,0.00079166243,0.0060955365,0.005572384,0.0121845845,0.0019710728,0.0111802295,0.011870518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042443696,0.0008729134,0.000903035,0.0070275567,0.014446236,0.015201085,0.0031475916,0.012699406,0.0052952096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009597091,0.0000356078,0.00035756425,0.0006918085,0.000011160704,0.00017213859,0.0013497752,0.00018764379,0.00029077145,0.7157953,0.22429332,0.056805387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002855293,0.000008655274,0.0004931218,0.0007506316,0.0000050761873,0.00012202501,0.00026188776,0.00006302569,0.00007497516,0.030114718,0.9680881,0.000015040174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011984371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016641207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014945533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010398378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009228259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07904053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415184943","doi":"","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada and non-national sources : empirical study of openness to the world and national withdrawal in the interpretation of fundamental rights","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"theses.fr (ABES)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Supreme court; Empirical research; Interpretation (philosophy); Statutory interpretation","score_opus":0.033366858977494286,"score_gpt":0.3220434229516495,"score_spread":0.2886765639741552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415184943","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7527967,0.0017238162,0.0006140014,0.009252592,0.00006952848,0.000048540365,0.00038171545,0.000007200948,0.23510581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923711,0.0004322988,0.000090707625,0.00047110493,0.000013596174,0.0000129013215,0.00011295174,0.000008836247,0.0064864405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99053544,0.0015298864,0.0002334956,0.0006652055,0.004866947,0.002169074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9572225,0.020246452,0.0044283024,0.0013376772,0.014383046,0.002381972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006359414,0.00024837404,0.0005780658,0.0035413124,0.0137843015,0.009284047,0.0016334272,0.0016665602,0.008295724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044203766,0.00021161622,0.0002976501,0.008841791,0.015463088,0.0035873535,0.004086548,0.0036658463,0.00034767063],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018290422,0.00017075361,0.19548307,0.00020222206,0.00012512025,0.0008630688,0.23168346,0.0009048938,0.00036602493,0.5168546,0.016679293,0.036484536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007150807,0.000057541813,0.4860841,0.0012052853,0.00019163325,0.00018739824,0.3214768,0.0018864967,0.000619526,0.0568174,0.13123873,0.00016349077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96049225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97989184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92838645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07161354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07999338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.519595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415223234","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i2.1874","title":"Contributions civilistes à l’interprétation des lois constitutionnelles canadiennes","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Teleology; Constitution; Argument (complex analysis); Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional law; Code (set theory); Relevance (law); Civil code","score_opus":0.01602313191760216,"score_gpt":0.29804034634127163,"score_spread":0.28201721442366945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415223234","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044147797,0.021227812,0.008906537,0.07746063,0.0017237054,0.000051975647,0.00028527633,0.00016802413,0.84602827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.912192,0.0067508994,0.0029575387,0.00377563,0.0005439868,0.000030107354,0.00010611988,0.00009031237,0.07355332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99432194,0.001745238,0.00009699405,0.00045402723,0.0021076447,0.0012741545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99525994,0.00215308,0.00018249117,0.00028855097,0.0017781969,0.00033775606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050955983,0.0006692309,0.00040715103,0.0037809897,0.016548635,0.014714621,0.001619786,0.0026701244,0.008433441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009136617,0.00034630165,0.00053076574,0.0033255336,0.029233346,0.003358873,0.002833016,0.004337301,0.00060874654],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008377702,0.000006126114,0.0003705336,0.0000415661,0.000006095821,0.00009864762,0.012126023,0.00026060926,0.00007340566,0.9682861,0.010016733,0.008705715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020456002,0.000010123656,0.004299008,0.0003351014,0.00003625894,0.00016949236,0.022007711,0.0011114865,0.00043450663,0.1883422,0.78317684,0.000056802077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9416464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9560562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11593195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11593195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.090475194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8411491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415244252","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.4105","title":"Racial Profiling and the Rule of Law: A Reply","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Statutory law; Profiling (computer programming); Racial profiling; Democracy; Race (biology)","score_opus":0.01917494328138697,"score_gpt":0.3000780945790827,"score_spread":0.2809031512976957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415244252","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044958835,0.0014610448,0.00014171122,0.9913762,0.0024937645,0.0000022412662,0.000019812756,0.000004638828,0.004051029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.034276582,0.004257438,0.00047211547,0.9231782,0.024629777,0.00003337747,0.000043902943,0.000041831958,0.013066836],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951383,0.0018612196,0.0002476954,0.00103942,0.0011450715,0.00056837965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9755671,0.019741662,0.0005871885,0.0007726136,0.0022332708,0.0010982007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008922619,0.0007117386,0.0012749303,0.0015554841,0.0071067032,0.008465324,0.0034199888,0.03796716,0.009864163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028371343,0.00054810266,0.0010141004,0.0018539635,0.022121843,0.018439855,0.004890784,0.035279866,0.0029748613],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032315278,0.00003786718,0.0003496715,0.00007449222,0.000010279479,0.00012481264,0.002201798,0.00013106536,0.00009240801,0.40981573,0.58048093,0.006648702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000111948495,0.00003174912,0.0013633502,0.00049070024,0.00002125713,0.00016972968,0.009327983,0.0006074507,0.00023343952,0.29429105,0.6932505,0.00010089331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019712934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016994381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03796716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00704406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065280725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05110848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415507993","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2025.10057","title":"Underuse of the Override","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Presumption; Comity; Charter; Supreme court; Judicial review; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Legislative history","score_opus":0.021674066433417596,"score_gpt":0.30086886121503714,"score_spread":0.27919479478161957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415507993","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15480506,0.0024059475,0.026389882,0.04224665,0.000771202,0.00014843358,0.00013281526,0.00016798086,0.7729321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97604513,0.00029324094,0.0018793729,0.008011816,0.00019441984,0.00005187875,0.00002320566,0.000060354265,0.013440626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9241523,0.019605571,0.0038298576,0.009502893,0.034718577,0.0081907995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9392786,0.023907395,0.0047331024,0.009675356,0.01933816,0.0030674469],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027565101,0.0003447153,0.0010657574,0.0020802608,0.010335412,0.010142239,0.002261271,0.005852518,0.005092904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06348278,0.0006638128,0.00046930477,0.0017045991,0.03172822,0.0050350768,0.0071945027,0.011037541,0.0006432373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002188475,0.000016086527,0.0020456067,0.000038365808,0.000018287816,0.00015582789,0.0077888663,0.0002278678,0.0006715369,0.975416,0.0044012167,0.009198539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006743438,0.00016594988,0.01627749,0.0008976776,0.00015132593,0.000721394,0.016518297,0.0027378495,0.0061598183,0.57578903,0.38027284,0.00024095672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13370131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1809121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9843876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015612452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02896786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2658462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416019422","doi":"10.21991/cf29503","title":"The Constitutional Status of Overbreadth: A Reply to Professor Stewart","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Norm (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Supreme court; Constitutional law; Charter","score_opus":0.02341658620626918,"score_gpt":0.3074552228880814,"score_spread":0.28403863668181223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416019422","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002402557,0.004717789,0.00046906827,0.9777245,0.00253148,0.0000043888863,0.000021802085,0.0000103360635,0.012118065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15303506,0.0073738247,0.0013209637,0.80117995,0.019937115,0.00007929718,0.000054113734,0.00009509646,0.016924521],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867024,0.0058401576,0.0005594801,0.0029581313,0.0028708277,0.0010689357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9530015,0.040218208,0.0009390469,0.0014312406,0.0030138998,0.0013961353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025656572,0.00057806197,0.001527941,0.0011655765,0.009632533,0.00894535,0.004684423,0.03533083,0.006689308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048911717,0.0007097955,0.0010093965,0.0014147296,0.03620185,0.017180566,0.006440421,0.038286842,0.0013781218],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031718475,0.000023052145,0.00025003107,0.000054545777,0.000007938055,0.00018127458,0.0032303932,0.000100248806,0.000121019366,0.85299355,0.13690875,0.006097395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000963915,0.00005691798,0.0007909151,0.0004878145,0.000015353593,0.00023954337,0.00512753,0.00043576004,0.00030526335,0.43214083,0.56022733,0.000076380486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014863529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014826465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99183005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008169954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007962474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13568652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416107846","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjaf067","title":"<i>Constraining the Court: Judicial Power and Policy Implementation in the Charter Era</i> , by James B. Kelly","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Power (physics); Judicial review; Judicial activism","score_opus":0.012898358641686102,"score_gpt":0.3258684917914153,"score_spread":0.3129701331497292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416107846","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010711095,0.02450284,0.002638632,0.8178675,0.0024301182,0.000022485541,0.00007538543,0.000051959643,0.14169985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7545256,0.02574569,0.0030614363,0.15674719,0.0061810426,0.00013486115,0.00005659953,0.00014787453,0.053399764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98701966,0.0074314955,0.00031347497,0.0009687414,0.00237908,0.0018874767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9753921,0.019609092,0.0016523751,0.000557335,0.0019269281,0.00086214533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014156931,0.00030890887,0.0004492801,0.0012128985,0.009725821,0.02194674,0.0015882629,0.010791514,0.0059619783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052364826,0.0005408414,0.00039993817,0.0021720654,0.02349886,0.011142301,0.0039628423,0.010328738,0.0008351428],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027357235,0.000012255676,0.0003775905,0.00006349281,0.0000074272352,0.00004404121,0.0026925514,0.00041399218,0.00013299244,0.8738152,0.11438092,0.008032181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043735097,0.000024950086,0.0033150788,0.00069415534,0.000030825555,0.000047287693,0.0089650825,0.0012115333,0.00065707177,0.5585505,0.4263807,0.00007906875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08594693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1354333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08594693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013031538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030435188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17089331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416124163","doi":"","title":"The comportemental Behavior of the constitutional judges","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"theses.fr (ABES)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Tribunal; Compatibilism","score_opus":0.045883791261855086,"score_gpt":0.32003294008185423,"score_spread":0.27414914881999913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416124163","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8269273,0.0007806576,0.005646187,0.0029987372,0.00005056924,0.00006178508,0.000072391864,0.000026884978,0.16343546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888416,0.00013245163,0.00077333365,0.00018515579,0.000011170572,0.000016405325,0.000021325157,0.0000099406025,0.010008602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900855,0.0052519436,0.0002946707,0.0012324308,0.0020661568,0.0010692747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98217,0.008431283,0.0030932531,0.0015219247,0.0030908678,0.0016926255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061975312,0.00011455621,0.00020044224,0.00092699716,0.0032496992,0.0050730645,0.00066040497,0.0010272558,0.0055798274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034106977,0.00021135993,0.00018476995,0.00094016374,0.0029270672,0.0014244975,0.0015615455,0.0011952661,0.00065013615],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004178036,0.00019666398,0.23470655,0.00021519774,0.00019460761,0.00088499894,0.16174667,0.0022418976,0.0121216355,0.43518993,0.007472479,0.14461152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010060134,0.00039710818,0.50897276,0.00040740243,0.00016319948,0.0008829618,0.111104235,0.009020091,0.0060559036,0.113311686,0.24932829,0.00025573102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017877366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0368971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017877366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035310725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039252113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0355466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416290320","doi":"10.29173/alr2828","title":"Constitutionalizing Criminal Law, Colton Fehr (Vancouver: UBC Press, 2022)","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Criminal law; Criminal liability","score_opus":0.03227752894328427,"score_gpt":0.3186891351445758,"score_spread":0.2864116062012915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416290320","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047123157,0.24652216,0.0022430618,0.4756553,0.037355866,0.00033437746,0.0027988206,0.00027532602,0.23010282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.042460084,0.033650707,0.001907705,0.20065345,0.0045510223,0.00021999438,0.00067436125,0.00019601313,0.7156867],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969977,0.0005213169,0.00015601965,0.0004309739,0.0012198711,0.0006741071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982829,0.0008693971,0.000058392136,0.00009218985,0.00044750338,0.00024964625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030184689,0.0011502512,0.0008004431,0.0025194176,0.015320628,0.01190311,0.002569417,0.022263609,0.012976163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071885046,0.0014988933,0.0007334953,0.0028830322,0.005847906,0.0024936076,0.0019366248,0.012996173,0.0042028427],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018683075,0.000016747976,0.00016983699,0.000071495764,0.000008571734,0.00009675092,0.0004988479,0.00012575426,0.0001247592,0.034734897,0.9531692,0.01096434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016277389,0.0000070217466,0.0018190374,0.00031256583,0.000018621,0.000032597887,0.0007704827,0.000116629235,0.0002652871,0.012233748,0.9843739,0.000033861215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72416663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92236865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72416663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024876453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025333434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55491555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416349722","doi":"10.3138/9781487568627-011","title":"9 Executive Legal Officer at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Officer; Supreme court; Chief executive officer; Liability; Legislation","score_opus":0.018459564603820568,"score_gpt":0.21261685683881767,"score_spread":0.19415729223499711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416349722","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008268044,0.03250201,0.0007140752,0.1505259,0.0063548973,0.0001871624,0.0027841236,0.00019173042,0.7984721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.048149247,0.0049601984,0.0005412829,0.019629708,0.000624273,0.00004520537,0.00024834657,0.00010432519,0.92569745],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99679774,0.0002284037,0.00006485307,0.00032294053,0.0010740412,0.0015119928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99715436,0.0006127038,0.000060653278,0.00007782935,0.0014554296,0.0006390687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016546919,0.00066127186,0.00072193664,0.0020844878,0.029283242,0.011596077,0.0020098705,0.011749676,0.06097488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004976349,0.0011271642,0.0005410054,0.0028052789,0.0035398349,0.0019976832,0.0012729475,0.009060104,0.0054990477],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016575843,0.000013504652,0.0004520344,0.000040416995,0.000005515812,0.00019988307,0.0008425192,0.00011447993,0.00009908074,0.13308375,0.8571618,0.007970463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001087462,0.0000061393634,0.0020402733,0.00016257705,0.000015560709,0.00003391845,0.0013736823,0.00018661252,0.00017637528,0.0058317753,0.9901329,0.000029256491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97888744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99479574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9294104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.070589595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15971582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5121658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416826384","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.70007","title":"<i>Allan C. Hutchinson</i> , Rethinking Legitimacy: Courts, Constitutions and Politics, Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2025, 192 pp, hb, £90.00","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Judicial restraint; Politics; Dissenting opinion; Judicial review; Constitutional law; Judicial independence; Nothing; Majority opinion","score_opus":0.04213518038715577,"score_gpt":0.32086423742568954,"score_spread":0.2787290570385338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416826384","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037571753,0.5758809,0.0011352004,0.31041268,0.0150729185,0.00003776423,0.00022483461,0.00012919118,0.0967308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03251451,0.4718583,0.0029441218,0.16680409,0.018666983,0.00023136429,0.00062292797,0.0005837152,0.30577397],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99568427,0.001503831,0.00022442474,0.00036592703,0.0018284665,0.0003930113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962411,0.0025163381,0.00027843897,0.00018061747,0.0005346652,0.00024878094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028180305,0.0013878326,0.0006927404,0.0022305048,0.0034050099,0.008758722,0.0023992085,0.0067767696,0.02233012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008355837,0.0009998169,0.00038392225,0.0036381017,0.012376648,0.016517887,0.0036210609,0.009201464,0.010551485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007266064,0.0000052694886,0.00006875669,0.00013985425,0.0000034389034,0.000044664223,0.0011474972,0.000024860947,0.000039492792,0.0532028,0.926951,0.018365161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004186096,0.0000026524533,0.00027439397,0.00045426862,0.0000015922363,0.00005174216,0.00060687505,0.000020941723,0.000035518824,0.02868843,0.96985036,0.000009107359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05605534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10905915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05605534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008718552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008113849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11145812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416871886","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5818842","title":"Athens v Ontario: What Can The First Democracy Teach Us About Judicial Review?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Legislation; Ultra vires; Judicial review; Constitutional review; Constitution; Supreme court; Ethos; Legislature","score_opus":0.010236362734791291,"score_gpt":0.2756719854647431,"score_spread":0.2654356227299518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416871886","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058803864,0.0051012947,0.00036137374,0.7332945,0.0005720545,0.000060255785,0.00035626418,0.000029165903,0.20142126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8239959,0.0041585816,0.0005708305,0.096654326,0.00071737514,0.000088198554,0.000111540634,0.000049400976,0.07365391],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864248,0.003030799,0.00025454143,0.0010422491,0.004018794,0.005228757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9716428,0.012819171,0.0028169048,0.0010521865,0.004547653,0.0071212803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009912921,0.0002620129,0.0005679877,0.0010903962,0.024493549,0.007870259,0.0020251377,0.0107369805,0.012518545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049231876,0.0004502613,0.00049875665,0.001805884,0.01793803,0.006293163,0.0030912873,0.009874604,0.0008287102],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021378322,0.00009989648,0.023171617,0.00028842784,0.00007271028,0.0006889499,0.022803,0.00052455626,0.00037245217,0.64101654,0.28091657,0.02983155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030447284,0.00009357419,0.1047203,0.0011885432,0.00013759318,0.00026938922,0.03087024,0.0006787989,0.0007554692,0.20253552,0.6582067,0.00023941063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9747251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99251974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15384021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15384021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25214776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9814254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417004399","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5854163","title":"Timely Trials, Costly Remedies: Remedial Deterrence after Jordan (2026) 49:1 Dal LJ (forthcoming)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Remedial education; Supreme court; Enforcement; Deterrence theory; Economic Justice; Meaning (existential); Forcing (mathematics); Interpretation (philosophy)","score_opus":0.04059461532254703,"score_gpt":0.3390233181412633,"score_spread":0.29842870281871625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417004399","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06833094,0.019283218,0.006432182,0.4930757,0.0031191004,0.0002730493,0.0011461793,0.00021654616,0.40812322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57327086,0.0051746517,0.0034268552,0.10783364,0.002818638,0.0003277774,0.00019212083,0.0001247233,0.30683073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967024,0.0011967346,0.00017183638,0.00039975642,0.00074729003,0.0007820635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890416,0.006457367,0.0014007364,0.0005164647,0.002001482,0.0005823126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008944309,0.000396745,0.0006587775,0.0010738826,0.0060546375,0.008096847,0.0011434479,0.014909787,0.03498962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037319895,0.00046422388,0.00034662103,0.0011675779,0.0033611804,0.005469329,0.001997702,0.007318118,0.0023535765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010498505,0.00011700285,0.003065456,0.000117360905,0.000022553135,0.00032635807,0.0015642659,0.0003270596,0.00024049108,0.6822062,0.27461562,0.037292633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002060503,0.00012840025,0.01233995,0.00056985114,0.000070824935,0.00029354187,0.0050117522,0.002683117,0.0018691178,0.35680652,0.61994046,0.00008042848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027870255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06368475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03498962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004104737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013548377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11705196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417315006","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2025.10060","title":"The Declaratory Theory of Judicial Law-Making","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University College London","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Adjudication; Positivism; Natural (archaeology); Legal positivism; Judicial opinion","score_opus":0.024187802881114162,"score_gpt":0.3113280521631375,"score_spread":0.28714024928202336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417315006","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02655836,0.0032218324,0.18432479,0.032542497,0.0011075187,0.00015183595,0.00018158698,0.00011125858,0.7518003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9539957,0.0011665863,0.017206738,0.0023260242,0.00086487253,0.0001693075,0.00008839549,0.00004762693,0.02413472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861055,0.006425448,0.0007883491,0.0019709114,0.0036427316,0.0010670982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9804648,0.011739595,0.0014869088,0.0027699568,0.002869081,0.000669596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01764081,0.00038620163,0.0006714218,0.0018873295,0.0041054254,0.011529155,0.0027241458,0.004863407,0.0075704525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018501867,0.0004240822,0.0010618854,0.0014187827,0.031149473,0.009013888,0.003622355,0.006636091,0.00088792504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.030706e-7,0.0000014090538,0.000011217305,0.0000028743957,6.228214e-7,0.0000043650307,0.00008238078,0.00008614885,0.0000067054957,0.9993492,0.00020136988,0.0002528764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009723026,0.0000027004812,0.00002560963,0.000021804824,0.0000025178647,0.000011338082,0.000064548105,0.00059243117,0.000042816417,0.99313825,0.006084309,0.00000384925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004337161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030753564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99566287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00552895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065010777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09329468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W44867640","doi":"","title":"Outsiders: The Sources and Impact of Secrecy at the Iacobucci Inquiry","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Secrecy; Commission; Political science; Relation (database); Scholarship; Democracy; Economic Justice; Corporate governance; Sociology; Diversity (politics); Public administration; Law; Public relations; Management","score_opus":0.018416710493985827,"score_gpt":0.31146328425903363,"score_spread":0.29304657376504784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W44867640","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37305677,0.0031552785,0.008882226,0.04157085,0.00023182332,0.00011751507,0.00011544309,0.00009764963,0.5727725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934563,0.00035754408,0.00025764309,0.0006620095,0.000033368644,0.00001359904,0.000010672075,0.000025578136,0.005183126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97461617,0.011084776,0.000514068,0.0013255074,0.007055313,0.0054041105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9485913,0.035163466,0.0039654057,0.0036278488,0.0062143924,0.0024376153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019820405,0.0003937347,0.0007383247,0.0036157984,0.03616535,0.03464613,0.0019445932,0.0036728093,0.0022619318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04143522,0.00060272595,0.00044183715,0.005559534,0.0807563,0.0074617662,0.0132696675,0.007434362,0.0002550779],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024776169,0.00001140858,0.005946252,0.000040814728,0.000009425818,0.0006841115,0.34457996,0.0002126043,0.00017437326,0.63683444,0.0031133543,0.008368523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028437013,0.00003716158,0.014613502,0.0008394382,0.000093409406,0.00059361244,0.6611477,0.001244141,0.0015159089,0.13870487,0.18106365,0.00011807719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5997298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6019486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5997298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056586772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07158103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.805255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W46320438","doi":"","title":"Developments in Constitutional Law: The 2013 Term","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Charter; Law; Political science; Supreme court; Constitutional law; Federalism; Context (archaeology); Doctrine; Human rights; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.03055673725031119,"score_gpt":0.29506117590874764,"score_spread":0.2645044386584364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W46320438","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01010699,0.10245401,0.008471034,0.13831043,0.005558421,0.00006168732,0.0002800204,0.00007664119,0.7346807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.612227,0.09925404,0.010939228,0.07623404,0.0074077486,0.00036053435,0.00048379408,0.00017995654,0.19291365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920472,0.0017238774,0.0002559727,0.000901198,0.003920987,0.0011508776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971233,0.0011237107,0.00017528316,0.0002655098,0.00093703304,0.00037508065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007323638,0.00038302332,0.0005639575,0.00224935,0.01014075,0.013348617,0.0016980077,0.005535805,0.0046077524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009215759,0.00039302424,0.0005582921,0.0041384757,0.03747425,0.0077973073,0.0042007756,0.009902163,0.0007133459],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017728358,0.0000027205433,0.000036972175,0.00001047421,5.579135e-7,0.000010781488,0.00037071036,0.0000483084,0.000017549602,0.98987716,0.006414813,0.0032082065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008068031,0.000011872171,0.0007707854,0.0002842983,0.000003576092,0.000055638255,0.00097102,0.00016978494,0.00008660477,0.24652965,0.75109047,0.000018177703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4224705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4155138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4224705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0634428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057072964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8400229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W47389072","doi":"","title":"The Theory of Strategic Legitimacy Cultivation: The Supreme Court of Canada and the Marshall Case","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Supreme court; Political science; Politics; Context (archaeology); Relevance (law); Power (physics); Law; Law and economics; Judicial review; Sociology","score_opus":0.019084891895844693,"score_gpt":0.25994524284040255,"score_spread":0.24086035094455785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W47389072","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2468531,0.0021364638,0.0074189524,0.034066804,0.00009482842,0.00006947024,0.00008983484,0.000038639624,0.7092318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99430037,0.00028219848,0.00046671048,0.00043826882,0.000022185328,0.000008627395,0.000009044347,0.000005406692,0.0044671665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967976,0.00068815437,0.000043073436,0.00027975847,0.0009834305,0.0012080699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99686253,0.001219151,0.00035033983,0.00023292215,0.00068194227,0.00065307313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002463812,0.00034839145,0.00039020454,0.001871946,0.0090054665,0.0072122524,0.0014640028,0.002930671,0.0037822598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007786893,0.00024757985,0.00029681358,0.0025919864,0.03769608,0.0032740564,0.0036718496,0.0028016195,0.0002170981],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004585942,0.000007783056,0.0012827857,0.000006356284,0.0000023871055,0.00010168338,0.0016305074,0.00051675434,0.000041624455,0.99348843,0.00092341454,0.0019936045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000614305,0.000014995418,0.006686017,0.00007902019,0.000024722107,0.000118709126,0.0056320275,0.0038945354,0.00021635853,0.9513656,0.031870026,0.000036556597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83432585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8597017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16567415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04958848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05416911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35979128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W48450459","doi":"","title":"Weak form of judicial review: apontamentos sobre o controle de constitucionalidade no Canadá, Nova Zelândia, Israel e Inglaterra","year":2012,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Ethnology; Sociology","score_opus":0.021469438550876525,"score_gpt":0.2847764196814032,"score_spread":0.2633069811305267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W48450459","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59794,0.0040686443,0.0035485267,0.016063256,0.000105257444,0.00016957447,0.0024860995,0.000052944837,0.3755656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97813046,0.0010782339,0.0006715472,0.0005153399,0.000024066638,0.00002145837,0.0003019089,0.000013961177,0.019242989],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99216896,0.0006990389,0.00027204212,0.0007667496,0.004032453,0.002060698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851966,0.003244345,0.0019269589,0.0005492257,0.0075733615,0.0015095572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036692494,0.00025268085,0.0004074088,0.0053158496,0.006064913,0.010142348,0.00114995,0.0006596495,0.006411396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019389668,0.00021349837,0.0002947224,0.008543902,0.0066807936,0.002224483,0.002276048,0.0015472163,0.00034438126],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012869416,0.000027019172,0.18698122,0.0002232754,0.000076460594,0.00046591184,0.026433477,0.0011802361,0.0007516367,0.692135,0.01793941,0.07365771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038246417,0.000052155352,0.71379834,0.00045805582,0.0002032972,0.0002843923,0.04404114,0.0026633306,0.0013864293,0.06792043,0.16904001,0.00011410901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92841053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95477647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07158947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056763172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.063930415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4118476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W560460769","doi":"","title":"Constitutional battles between parliament and the executive: the Canadian prorogation crisis (日加法政セミナー2010報告)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"法政理論","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Constitutional crisis; Law; Constitution; Politics","score_opus":0.057089818003868364,"score_gpt":0.2828344671331767,"score_spread":0.22574464912930836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W560460769","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21438065,0.011224872,0.000601942,0.47303358,0.0012202463,0.00007134947,0.0004918535,0.000059343347,0.29891616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92576575,0.0026951567,0.00032365514,0.02582849,0.0002720112,0.000034338398,0.00007764794,0.00005287192,0.04495007],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863187,0.0016104532,0.00020042223,0.00080726185,0.003773613,0.0072895517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98695976,0.0045966962,0.00068887713,0.00032238834,0.0044112382,0.0030211331],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008455188,0.0005446294,0.00088125677,0.0035203043,0.07460109,0.022969363,0.0044029546,0.0129299015,0.012765356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029628003,0.00083008775,0.00056870026,0.0077730445,0.032986775,0.0064262873,0.005270041,0.01863151,0.0005554402],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013889928,0.00006047142,0.003833083,0.0001291528,0.000032778124,0.0007435984,0.08983114,0.000706633,0.00040434703,0.74913627,0.13172679,0.023256835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009086773,0.00003714481,0.046129912,0.00047455053,0.000064896594,0.00022931388,0.21209343,0.00096008636,0.00054559176,0.058360804,0.68066925,0.000344065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9973379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99867755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3150989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.3150989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.38395664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7943882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W56382558","doi":"","title":"The Political Origins of Constitutional Courts: Italy, Germany, France, Poland, Canada, United Kingdom","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Politics; Kingdom; German; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.021111915965579754,"score_gpt":0.2916644706298031,"score_spread":0.27055255466422334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W56382558","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20229691,0.05838615,0.00082420075,0.066812105,0.0003160572,0.000047188438,0.0006581182,0.000046574176,0.6706127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94955444,0.007973611,0.0004334987,0.0028899596,0.00015257734,0.000021440359,0.00012564562,0.0000378938,0.038810845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978369,0.00031838517,0.00004018052,0.00016878085,0.0004967506,0.0011390584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99759525,0.0008740476,0.00031110324,0.00007612847,0.0006938306,0.00044965476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015048684,0.00024205414,0.0004031067,0.0042207716,0.009378807,0.014533079,0.0008278354,0.0021805377,0.0049128267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004976198,0.00043389425,0.00030686412,0.008391687,0.012741984,0.002636344,0.0018766632,0.004445361,0.00026890836],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028219409,0.00001278751,0.003433012,0.000045467506,0.00000927633,0.00018634796,0.008923534,0.0002505559,0.000078587254,0.9615582,0.0153467255,0.010127207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008587563,0.000029516203,0.21727993,0.0010032227,0.00007896543,0.00023125582,0.022742903,0.0008756742,0.0003710031,0.099250674,0.65794,0.00011104795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91588706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9719791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.084155776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.084155776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048033904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6105957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W564531261","doi":"","title":"Political dispute and judicial review : assessing the work of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Nelson/Thomson Learning eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Politics; Law; Political science; Work (physics); Certiorari; Original jurisdiction; Engineering","score_opus":0.024415139642079194,"score_gpt":0.2871366400372325,"score_spread":0.2627215003951533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W564531261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3055064,0.044584982,0.0011874663,0.14338766,0.0004926572,0.00018912165,0.0009920017,0.000041554893,0.5036182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9695402,0.0074272407,0.00055489305,0.0030823643,0.00013091094,0.000041165385,0.00012420086,0.00002501137,0.019073987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832909,0.0045014424,0.00030512724,0.00080026634,0.007086178,0.0040161917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94361234,0.02381043,0.0027011079,0.0010045728,0.021201925,0.0076695303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010627935,0.00039389502,0.00060377934,0.008465612,0.02093621,0.014897662,0.002691563,0.0055103973,0.0050581885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07690425,0.00042667493,0.0003494494,0.016673349,0.016919062,0.0039544906,0.0032204783,0.0030787091,0.00028567098],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015876866,0.00013447346,0.05544701,0.00034399753,0.00010887105,0.0005825481,0.050612964,0.00470034,0.00021419027,0.6810847,0.11746743,0.089144744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013269551,0.00011808375,0.29639345,0.0019666976,0.00029873496,0.00028436276,0.1140223,0.0074638226,0.0005201672,0.17967963,0.3988143,0.0003057463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9903611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79788536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20211464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.38174945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92543393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W565867575","doi":"","title":"Constitutionalizing everything: the role of \"Charter values\"","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitution; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Context (archaeology); Scope (computer science); Perspective (graphical); Normative; United Nations Charter; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Politics","score_opus":0.025182750580389688,"score_gpt":0.26079776554921974,"score_spread":0.23561501496883006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W565867575","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06554018,0.010712548,0.05724557,0.14497957,0.0010111956,0.000072966366,0.00011365789,0.000102232276,0.72022206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800325,0.0020662309,0.00568536,0.00530881,0.00044071875,0.0000720296,0.000033642762,0.000049049184,0.00631166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9798023,0.013435655,0.0004268466,0.001696705,0.003002024,0.0016365098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9771871,0.016551366,0.001312381,0.0027086737,0.0014644691,0.00077597884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02313225,0.0004323382,0.00071820733,0.0019723019,0.009950454,0.01595621,0.0021805677,0.005289986,0.0023993452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03022665,0.00033380536,0.0004854225,0.0022257122,0.10176687,0.016536845,0.0056595625,0.010752039,0.00022695506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.573193e-7,0.0000010986404,0.000031194384,0.0000028891816,5.514178e-7,0.0000039740157,0.0008635594,0.000028461893,0.00000838175,0.99808913,0.0002585076,0.0007114049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008813125,0.000007967167,0.00023996973,0.00009164318,0.0000061453106,0.000019868203,0.0020898797,0.00016377144,0.00010779757,0.96628124,0.030973196,0.000009848267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02004442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020685546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02313225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011388859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013577909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12233651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W56764392","doi":"","title":"MARBURY V. MADISON AND CANADIAN CONSTITUTIONALISM: RHETORIC AND PRACTICE","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Rhetoric; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Democracy; Politics; Theology","score_opus":0.009319932124885218,"score_gpt":0.2007924339054176,"score_spread":0.19147250178053238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W56764392","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025626596,0.02524825,0.002103629,0.1877645,0.0009633458,0.000071889684,0.00037833143,0.00009444189,0.7577491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83085847,0.009683871,0.002036174,0.026591586,0.00055419904,0.00008095676,0.00009963817,0.000089824,0.13000527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99205095,0.0021701604,0.00021525584,0.0010204084,0.0024654386,0.00207793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896801,0.0061197714,0.0005755406,0.0004692762,0.0023814715,0.00077373773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007885505,0.00067962497,0.00059271674,0.00417589,0.029146,0.015249947,0.0025074577,0.008862601,0.012294028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028283576,0.00072136236,0.0003453671,0.007335004,0.027777616,0.004845329,0.0034382867,0.007493936,0.0005747248],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011719496,0.0000030904378,0.00025431457,0.000029179688,0.0000039829793,0.00005141665,0.0058060274,0.00008065104,0.00006105174,0.95356166,0.03533933,0.0047975597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040889103,0.000015104749,0.0049268506,0.00064852374,0.000073299394,0.000074671,0.0098112,0.00038834682,0.0004550206,0.17891182,0.80451,0.00014432908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96817446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98432446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11251046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11251046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10359716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81632435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W56873797","doi":"","title":"Women legislators and women's issues in British Columbia","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.02345531210397092,"score_gpt":0.25546771299883564,"score_spread":0.23201240089486472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W56873797","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36599168,0.16081578,0.00037215347,0.1965706,0.0032833898,0.00037674542,0.0032252015,0.000051682684,0.26931277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79519016,0.0497016,0.000490595,0.0270607,0.0004444673,0.00018292604,0.0005924719,0.000051310144,0.12628579],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99222434,0.0015635451,0.00048212346,0.00041106137,0.0024136608,0.0029052082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97099453,0.012568382,0.001280461,0.0003337397,0.012440094,0.0023829178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009037904,0.0002888867,0.00072132656,0.009972543,0.022087706,0.010394217,0.0019348429,0.0036320537,0.007946184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03167937,0.0006194929,0.00038100904,0.018140312,0.0050906907,0.0014670199,0.0020437264,0.004661013,0.00036545933],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005414725,0.00018747977,0.066572905,0.0036292728,0.00034202047,0.0021618556,0.07735683,0.002144766,0.0014088878,0.21386275,0.4621487,0.16964304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006795828,0.00004562603,0.18198362,0.0025185077,0.00024352445,0.00013394043,0.060117267,0.00039879067,0.00068930286,0.0055058524,0.7481304,0.0001651217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99276334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16394576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16394576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27362642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9697044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W569840623","doi":"","title":"Essential readings in Canadian constitutional politics","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.028220080188223126,"score_gpt":0.27569919716675356,"score_spread":0.24747911697853042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W569840623","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015053222,0.010814866,0.0009275835,0.023456186,0.001284313,0.00003298126,0.00025910072,0.00005695114,0.9616627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12987891,0.012342264,0.002055242,0.010325835,0.0010961065,0.00010250428,0.0002627024,0.00017580816,0.8437606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974953,0.00038209223,0.000046411104,0.00018058444,0.0012252438,0.00067042815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984158,0.0004187674,0.000029825425,0.00007652301,0.0008674547,0.00019155024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001592133,0.00093760714,0.00060609623,0.005082274,0.021589532,0.011872354,0.0020227027,0.003324671,0.029542604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044646333,0.00047769494,0.00044264764,0.0076877894,0.014287568,0.0029392666,0.001457907,0.006725645,0.0021047757],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003929635,0.000004712622,0.0000451468,0.000019587615,0.0000011878433,0.000027386472,0.0015565957,0.00007683466,0.000019359228,0.86819583,0.12265212,0.007397176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049386144,0.0000020305372,0.000553591,0.00011286036,0.0000049691434,0.00002661944,0.0016295853,0.00014120105,0.000054424247,0.105713814,0.89174056,0.000015366415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9719293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9860513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13550067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13550067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10892896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98313075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W582837541","doi":"10.3138/9781442684898","title":"Empirical Gap in Jurisprudence: A Comprehensive Study of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Precedent; Majority opinion; Judicial opinion; Empirical research; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0693715708397739,"score_gpt":0.3457660307073014,"score_spread":0.2763944598675275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W582837541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77539694,0.044008892,0.00091237156,0.020967213,0.0001671294,0.00028145738,0.013414941,0.000058738708,0.14479229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9749683,0.012674987,0.0009505311,0.0011538346,0.000051292514,0.000075057855,0.0029778127,0.00003856774,0.00710964],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947825,0.0005435423,0.0001728975,0.00045116563,0.0030640534,0.0009857795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9788617,0.0074204844,0.0011604303,0.0004407146,0.009937156,0.002179433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037024424,0.00031158005,0.0007876851,0.013085851,0.018597748,0.0064509595,0.0021724373,0.0013240882,0.0049399678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018000972,0.00047321265,0.00037513537,0.042132244,0.0050469153,0.0031195648,0.0024196957,0.0018557671,0.00029454965],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009544112,0.0002665654,0.3252862,0.0016676042,0.00026334336,0.0018091653,0.17732248,0.0021436706,0.00044326074,0.221504,0.13601497,0.13318339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014784308,0.000030995907,0.742717,0.0016625331,0.00012938619,0.00025115343,0.10874359,0.0015876218,0.00017900253,0.00742061,0.13717467,0.000088584966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9965797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99884087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84915715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15084286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20681715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9849019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W600801085","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2615","title":"Book Notes: The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism: Theory and Practice, by Stephen Gardbaum","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Constitutionalism; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030368157828518594,"score_gpt":0.3020101096435849,"score_spread":0.2716419518150663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W600801085","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003130316,0.06792022,0.018603567,0.45142633,0.0074471696,0.000028705097,0.00026395358,0.00011011862,0.45106965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2696504,0.07055805,0.014661108,0.10326047,0.0142859835,0.00019048894,0.00029777907,0.0004665631,0.5266292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888784,0.00048673517,0.0000418662,0.00016369208,0.0003346737,0.00008508186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969206,0.0023270426,0.000106669446,0.00015873084,0.00038013654,0.000106719606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020918278,0.0004316603,0.00041995224,0.0017942062,0.0038530566,0.00757817,0.0009315805,0.0052257446,0.013298198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006459336,0.00041482178,0.00032025977,0.0034799583,0.013078015,0.011883284,0.0014632299,0.005921894,0.002491483],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001553273,0.0000048114557,0.00005083187,0.000013819689,9.771989e-7,0.000009148572,0.00039623954,0.000078341145,0.000010176927,0.9175193,0.07833432,0.0035805062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045884512,0.0000030379392,0.00015886522,0.00013335224,0.0000025941295,0.000028993987,0.00049307593,0.00016319597,0.000042673226,0.7102049,0.28875557,0.000009188747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024145663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047996685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024145663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047347713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038449557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04801023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W600925096","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1025","title":"Evaluating Federally Appointed Judges in Canada: Analyzing the Controversy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Brock University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.058888185128276954,"score_gpt":0.3342579118559903,"score_spread":0.2753697267277133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W600925096","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7875912,0.006401678,0.0016642745,0.08869518,0.00060952187,0.0002101501,0.00039406848,0.000057837653,0.11437608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845961,0.0010924706,0.00066361076,0.004867737,0.000088175315,0.000037208527,0.0000884951,0.000026237052,0.008539906],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9557343,0.0068607233,0.0010559998,0.0019630403,0.021623006,0.012762946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90844506,0.023753637,0.004346127,0.0013720111,0.05325422,0.008828999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027420366,0.00040447936,0.0010358952,0.0060624992,0.059408233,0.016827164,0.00468108,0.005512606,0.0022010857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07903593,0.0006396119,0.00050194253,0.01266771,0.01587552,0.0023477003,0.0051136054,0.0076786173,0.00021661095],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003047442,0.0002745562,0.13136137,0.000504183,0.00016679187,0.0027252187,0.46605864,0.002142262,0.0021907887,0.1948207,0.08911488,0.11033597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068881076,0.00010991126,0.27177715,0.00069802516,0.00015982382,0.00024331639,0.474318,0.002826766,0.0017755247,0.009599517,0.23809499,0.00032815398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9957379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99844956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31271595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.31271595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32485414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7971521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W620324408","doi":"10.5860/choice.39-1208","title":"In the grip of freedom: law and modernity in Max Weber","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Choice Reviews Online","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Politics; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Charter; Modernity; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0929014354011797,"score_gpt":0.375346137139923,"score_spread":0.28244470173874325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W620324408","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010848901,0.27145654,0.0046274103,0.31326365,0.0037777903,0.000030715386,0.00008544543,0.000059645576,0.39584985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63477933,0.14665228,0.005128416,0.055333808,0.017669374,0.00018137546,0.00008029184,0.00019619073,0.13997886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800485,0.00095421413,0.000045559747,0.00024217089,0.00050296594,0.00025020752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830186,0.0011861838,0.00011887403,0.0000914562,0.00012595044,0.00017565778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029609546,0.0006298412,0.0004948772,0.0020904436,0.0071396176,0.006556697,0.0007711278,0.002804996,0.0023639032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004504912,0.0003394796,0.00029149035,0.0027345847,0.035482924,0.012391357,0.0024706773,0.0040287413,0.00056304707],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007425167,0.0000097906095,0.00008645619,0.000021352682,0.0000013240928,0.00003783307,0.004027667,0.00010627885,0.000031743726,0.96585,0.02374217,0.0060780146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004547924,0.0000072252406,0.0002494418,0.00019543989,0.0000018001589,0.00005158949,0.0017075907,0.00017512587,0.00005574479,0.6863924,0.31114507,0.000014107521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01546603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01140944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01546603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0100064725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051225214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07260239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W625926543","doi":"10.5860/choice.48-5932","title":"The judge as political theorist: contemporary constitutional review","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Choice Reviews Online","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.17377178523529777,"score_gpt":0.40114993486231043,"score_spread":0.22737814962701267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W625926543","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019207178,0.365528,0.0053384923,0.33870715,0.016524216,0.00008564234,0.00016653279,0.00005976308,0.27166945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24573725,0.3035675,0.0056541404,0.16520867,0.091506295,0.0007441774,0.00031089797,0.00037077293,0.18690027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98205584,0.010479812,0.00080166775,0.0019237448,0.003913682,0.0008252492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95118433,0.04139322,0.0012458522,0.0015404482,0.003716279,0.00091990986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01954458,0.00051889743,0.0013527077,0.008806563,0.0072006835,0.018451527,0.0025323974,0.013683626,0.012547968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060233843,0.00089066575,0.0005059849,0.009336672,0.03337977,0.01656244,0.0027789196,0.013539012,0.002322653],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038100225,0.00000901887,0.00003447389,0.000102300204,0.000002943899,0.000015585247,0.00056405773,0.00006884144,0.0000144069045,0.9281334,0.06315096,0.007900087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000111207655,0.000009787422,0.00020019621,0.0006417619,0.0000054703955,0.000031416672,0.0005636385,0.0001464875,0.000030666994,0.4538989,0.54444706,0.000013460465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011395653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0116611635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01954458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01312155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012716438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10336292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W626926647","doi":"10.21991/c9pq1s","title":"JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE AND JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION: THE CASE OF PROVINCIAL COURT JUDGES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial independence; Judicial discretion; Judicial activism; Political science; Administration (probate law); Independence (probability theory); Judicial opinion; Law; Judicial review; Supreme court; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.03777566139922089,"score_gpt":0.2853693183396633,"score_spread":0.24759365694044239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W626926647","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5295316,0.0030767703,0.0018603024,0.082176164,0.00017842057,0.00007077175,0.00011346781,0.00001591764,0.3829766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98583245,0.00046302314,0.00025443613,0.0019692988,0.00006242127,0.000015261508,0.000013855812,0.000007719941,0.011381454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9841521,0.003572637,0.0002880707,0.0005851716,0.002738976,0.008663201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856257,0.007379393,0.0012405467,0.00052130735,0.0023169052,0.0029162348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008825588,0.0001920954,0.0006554417,0.0014014608,0.0314313,0.013120648,0.0023652753,0.007857904,0.0046745175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030169552,0.0006086694,0.00075611897,0.0044908933,0.016353752,0.0035589207,0.005278223,0.012091223,0.00031560627],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102138634,0.000068774934,0.008919462,0.000034424927,0.000034420656,0.0015183131,0.051968202,0.00079091557,0.00044441232,0.91770756,0.010575806,0.007835462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003243136,0.00010700543,0.10143302,0.00047683515,0.00029136066,0.0013574633,0.12784922,0.0054098656,0.0013640524,0.50456214,0.25650463,0.00032009868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8428888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94132656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8428888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05682724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11853276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4123124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W629870081","doi":"","title":"Arbitration and Judicial Power under the united States Constitution","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Arbitration; Political science; Humanities; Power (physics); Executive power; Philosophy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.027100859850531647,"score_gpt":0.3050279278552139,"score_spread":0.27792706800468225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W629870081","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12987448,0.0044125943,0.0034794752,0.030971328,0.00032674227,0.000035897887,0.00009255075,0.000014663821,0.8307923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98641646,0.0006698348,0.00036099472,0.0013668162,0.00014199504,0.000034861456,0.000017170663,0.0000070562005,0.010984767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98408985,0.008474379,0.0005115427,0.0015082016,0.002229918,0.0031861754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98920244,0.007562019,0.0009503214,0.0007925479,0.0011690484,0.00032358192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013352592,0.00024310095,0.0005302936,0.0014606982,0.007419627,0.010572598,0.0011389973,0.0055530104,0.0073333196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025101757,0.0003524848,0.0005295635,0.0019153785,0.018921807,0.0058338875,0.0045732283,0.004236314,0.0006965828],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007736016,0.000004537476,0.00012952308,0.000004593564,0.000002044879,0.000024274543,0.00073997607,0.00008987027,0.000026217893,0.9969331,0.00092568446,0.0011124943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048607602,0.000019201347,0.0012494078,0.00008763699,0.000013746369,0.000042236617,0.0019597658,0.00072166877,0.00026517056,0.9586585,0.036915075,0.000018927649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013672376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01594621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013672376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060720146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066419276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07061607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W630622461","doi":"","title":"Judicial activism : authority, principle and policy in the judicial method","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Sweet & Maxwell eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Judicial activism; Economic Justice; Legislation; Judicial review; Judicial independence; Context (archaeology); History","score_opus":0.037927482324531143,"score_gpt":0.3576384883402034,"score_spread":0.31971100601567226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W630622461","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009900694,0.023640925,0.039487716,0.22877483,0.0029506048,0.00014062312,0.000032719076,0.00007915506,0.6949928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81315964,0.009582347,0.013235145,0.043425124,0.011271238,0.00072468375,0.00003966751,0.00024826906,0.10831383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95302576,0.030387817,0.0013311541,0.0042943903,0.007261592,0.0036992887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95111966,0.040010463,0.0016802993,0.0029599352,0.0022879208,0.0019417062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041722234,0.00046983134,0.0007461353,0.0026196362,0.011651797,0.032621857,0.0028773367,0.014317018,0.0061322628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035473146,0.00067894126,0.00075519114,0.0017672369,0.07241475,0.015190568,0.009094405,0.017503144,0.001280157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002596881,0.000004903842,0.00004059479,0.000010750355,0.00000110762,0.000009405958,0.000892135,0.000038636426,0.000017831251,0.99476385,0.0020435029,0.00217485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028468345,0.000023067872,0.0002215987,0.00028869646,0.0000060451425,0.000049381597,0.0011000104,0.00033754116,0.00015167466,0.8500085,0.1477699,0.000015126534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003693488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003230265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041722234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011193046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013779007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22065091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W630817675","doi":"","title":"Constitutional litigation in Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Thomson/Carswell eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.018389158184894852,"score_gpt":0.2374740055349331,"score_spread":0.21908484735003825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W630817675","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017670887,0.021266332,0.0007415956,0.083978325,0.001305454,0.00014386812,0.00091565953,0.00010107088,0.873877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23381038,0.010585596,0.0011132685,0.029116658,0.00044622394,0.00016297158,0.00034424014,0.00014037431,0.7242803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917529,0.00070549926,0.00016446716,0.00069376914,0.0029671967,0.0037161305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99559,0.00097161107,0.00011289216,0.00017066035,0.0021466524,0.0010082264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032405357,0.000895884,0.0011263684,0.004550766,0.042771917,0.019392567,0.0035529549,0.011935513,0.037640344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011382359,0.0010721786,0.00092904846,0.00756864,0.010465826,0.0033979379,0.0039062444,0.009968933,0.0021648698],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023084976,0.00004378011,0.0009126764,0.000070596856,0.000017833176,0.00025275885,0.002472665,0.0006108248,0.000083136314,0.7175609,0.25815785,0.019793816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040063525,0.000019753867,0.004552359,0.0004674574,0.000058114685,0.000093457114,0.0071023987,0.000924765,0.00022925981,0.06382757,0.9225811,0.00010367723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99592376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99820423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.801361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19863898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.38124713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9294652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W631063379","doi":"","title":"Supreme court of Canada : supreme court, law of Canada, lawsuit, appeal, judge, chief justice of Canada, history of the supreme court of Canada, judicial committee of the privy council","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Betascript Pub. eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Original jurisdiction; Certiorari; Remand (court procedure); Court of equity; Appeal; Majority opinion; Court of record; Lawsuit; Precedent","score_opus":0.04074741758313307,"score_gpt":0.20833892520182187,"score_spread":0.1675915076186888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W631063379","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030199478,0.17365792,0.0008960393,0.055251352,0.0028255975,0.00010181773,0.0066292845,0.00019381387,0.75742435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0679517,0.05472895,0.0011579884,0.011076655,0.0008525517,0.00009481185,0.0024074255,0.0001942567,0.86153567],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986657,0.00007289105,0.000029216275,0.00012394432,0.0007511451,0.00035719853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847466,0.00020528416,0.000053465894,0.000044573404,0.0009927722,0.00022925316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062230375,0.00088924327,0.00055650884,0.002931843,0.0143244015,0.007995302,0.0019660916,0.0037143694,0.028382726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032971106,0.00082472735,0.00034246332,0.008473625,0.0045791403,0.0021382743,0.0009776433,0.0039531724,0.0044038994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070136916,0.00000969238,0.00034729944,0.000059729846,0.000003831497,0.000049367278,0.0006055292,0.00021092709,0.00004260521,0.08668902,0.8960907,0.01588429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066154244,0.0000029009946,0.003526045,0.00033305792,0.000010073897,0.000044231954,0.00087846536,0.00015532956,0.000058227866,0.014418837,0.98053944,0.000026761725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9934176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12087897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12087897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18100503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8770424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W638564284","doi":"","title":"Law and rights : global perspectives on constitutionalism and governance","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Political science; Enforcement; Law; Context (archaeology); Rule of law; Constitutional law; Democracy; Politics; Corporate governance; Meaning (existential); Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.010278476992866508,"score_gpt":0.25978799839127553,"score_spread":0.249509521398409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W638564284","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017744834,0.039458998,0.018933667,0.05549226,0.000998433,0.000028512311,0.000089280074,0.00006032328,0.86719364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8812583,0.04043699,0.0064651496,0.007699566,0.002430226,0.00012563988,0.00016020177,0.00015343902,0.06127054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774086,0.0010727225,0.00006860433,0.0002767838,0.00040944014,0.00043162823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983376,0.0011043556,0.00012608594,0.0002059896,0.000100594676,0.00012537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00227369,0.0005165021,0.000612142,0.0017095878,0.0030346885,0.010398123,0.0007644399,0.0022602654,0.008504433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002666896,0.00022433166,0.00045721786,0.003268527,0.027020482,0.011209276,0.0044569843,0.0052634533,0.0005659747],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001648897,0.0000018777948,0.00006506676,0.000016062206,0.0000014339273,0.000013624213,0.0010746137,0.00011278783,0.000020754325,0.9951073,0.0012283053,0.0023565071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063012767,0.0000120276245,0.00050106866,0.00019584197,0.00000678572,0.00007123411,0.0027734402,0.00020068442,0.000059092617,0.7935419,0.20262699,0.000004635051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033348491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052465927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010398123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050717844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025285617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036798596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W642658120","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1266","title":"Book Notes: Are Judges Political?: An Empirical Analysis of the Federal Judiciary, by Cass R. Sunstein, David Schkade, Lisa M. Ellman and Andreas Sawicki","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Politics; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03132276836065787,"score_gpt":0.33287256854290775,"score_spread":0.30154980018224986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W642658120","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038380645,0.052437484,0.007897645,0.58055264,0.00282527,0.000073901414,0.0049062106,0.00010886731,0.31281736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53793097,0.07542723,0.006587967,0.08211479,0.007653882,0.0003493876,0.0036109323,0.000301175,0.28602377],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992849,0.00024947297,0.000033304106,0.00008703357,0.00028394876,0.0000612766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97656894,0.020266222,0.0009374036,0.00035935635,0.0015759969,0.00029204658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018700778,0.00042665622,0.00049572374,0.0020223642,0.003977943,0.0041078106,0.0008404788,0.0022656077,0.028117497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01254694,0.000419312,0.00031144792,0.005483395,0.004664452,0.005518363,0.00065610796,0.003579724,0.004187617],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026764978,0.000054120293,0.0066047683,0.00010086568,0.0000134984575,0.000058256945,0.0015987565,0.00065458746,0.000040597515,0.35259768,0.61930406,0.018946012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059255675,0.00006647279,0.03529628,0.0011703274,0.00007181167,0.00016595637,0.010068481,0.0020226822,0.00060960074,0.48810455,0.4622831,0.000081379185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057231266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14514567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057231266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032802878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036924724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.113796294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W644252459","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1234","title":"Constitutional Questions about Canada's New Political Finance Regime","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Politics; Parliament; Campaign finance; Charter; Political science; Democracy; Supreme court; Law; Political economy; Economics; Public administration","score_opus":0.020851839523240236,"score_gpt":0.2919383808428328,"score_spread":0.2710865413195926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W644252459","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14324716,0.0056916447,0.004490768,0.17091829,0.0015980534,0.00028086765,0.0017019708,0.00017278193,0.67189837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90607655,0.0017689861,0.0026397817,0.030804468,0.00058650953,0.00015886553,0.00034220004,0.000060272567,0.057562366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98613864,0.0012046011,0.00037955266,0.0014187914,0.006228888,0.0046294704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900198,0.003531637,0.00047265145,0.0007657859,0.003768845,0.0014413076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010594949,0.00032477843,0.0007541659,0.0019580557,0.021344377,0.019161576,0.0030836498,0.0070473365,0.004905934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022417977,0.0007065591,0.00064414437,0.002481069,0.019285984,0.0036946568,0.0022872256,0.011790564,0.0003162903],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014031357,0.000012791082,0.0006623742,0.000013721884,0.0000063085495,0.00006481467,0.0013314042,0.00031119018,0.0002478974,0.98350495,0.009963045,0.0038674301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019831612,0.00007213198,0.02163463,0.00047853595,0.000121030804,0.00016683975,0.005075978,0.0028309696,0.0016989307,0.28247848,0.68489,0.0003541394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9665717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9771473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8557573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14424269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19602685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99255717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W645411594","doi":"10.1515/9780773572553","title":"Constitutional Origins, Structure, and Change in Federal Countries","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02274033423511265,"score_gpt":0.245430637308551,"score_spread":0.22269030307343834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W645411594","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.116711244,0.01869968,0.006188585,0.010883318,0.00023724062,0.00004102273,0.00009145202,0.000047382193,0.8471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98169464,0.003123355,0.0009988146,0.00038433864,0.00007371269,0.000034523608,0.00003874552,0.000015439191,0.013636512],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968215,0.0018534139,0.00010694056,0.00035817648,0.00041239543,0.00044754302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982993,0.0010845826,0.0001632965,0.00024414834,0.00013955426,0.00006909083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031744733,0.000101158774,0.0002565007,0.0018801445,0.005802383,0.0070477333,0.00062215875,0.0011027403,0.002165388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066221994,0.000215857,0.0001871869,0.0033767456,0.021842744,0.0032730896,0.0018806697,0.002401161,0.0001368902],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012925817,0.0000021395927,0.00009992899,0.0000049508812,6.885411e-7,0.000010214524,0.0024798724,0.00011715529,0.000020107886,0.994307,0.0004781743,0.0024785532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000110346,0.000020836007,0.005638444,0.0001959948,0.000009716589,0.00008055002,0.008036878,0.00055229146,0.0002746348,0.6984986,0.2866617,0.000019297851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011514236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017177828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011514236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010364596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004052203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07520074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W645723559","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1078","title":"Book Review: A Perilous Imbalance: The Globalization of Canadian Law and Governance, by Stephen Clarkson and Stepan Wood","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.014905181804278973,"score_gpt":0.23644380317376262,"score_spread":0.22153862136948366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W645723559","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023590167,0.62106377,0.00016667174,0.27643347,0.07120958,0.00002737178,0.00069340016,0.00004724889,0.03012259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007922729,0.6013515,0.00047736074,0.1354931,0.061959144,0.00008233149,0.0009484782,0.00017000722,0.19159545],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802077,0.00020740456,0.000072232375,0.00018076367,0.0012925197,0.00022628173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991803,0.0015640606,0.00028105997,0.00017018657,0.005557234,0.00062450976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001929617,0.0010618308,0.0011426928,0.00595932,0.0035873624,0.0069380696,0.0021243365,0.004931301,0.020839587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0100163035,0.0006084681,0.0004886348,0.012770767,0.0031741112,0.0041991463,0.0013172056,0.0044783223,0.005328582],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013115681,0.0000011755498,0.000021996653,0.0000716892,0.0000015819188,0.0000037590978,0.000018802519,0.000012939492,0.0000050519207,0.00081346574,0.9949067,0.0041415296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003436085,0.0000020435548,0.00037369438,0.00046942162,0.000006777112,0.000017463217,0.000096432246,0.000017111846,0.000010804633,0.0009415413,0.99805355,0.0000075719167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.69023836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8936233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30976164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029083941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05197684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6231718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W645818486","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1285","title":"The Serendipitous Solution to the Problem of Supreme Court Appointments","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Corollary; Politics; Political science; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01940553993575264,"score_gpt":0.2662721349810654,"score_spread":0.24686659504531275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W645818486","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075097946,0.0069126817,0.02581302,0.73773193,0.0113325,0.000073958094,0.00025404507,0.00016994867,0.21020217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5066715,0.0056676907,0.016739886,0.27210385,0.020799564,0.00027889764,0.0002292531,0.00038028418,0.17712906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9775605,0.008389525,0.0008412326,0.0050676316,0.005472627,0.0026684136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9705056,0.013354903,0.0024191358,0.0054414365,0.0053687203,0.0029101311],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020473963,0.00061159406,0.0011408438,0.0015362354,0.010947345,0.009486474,0.0033066722,0.017451527,0.022842722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08630409,0.00065287127,0.0007602771,0.0021870004,0.021559456,0.01388854,0.0073197014,0.022801695,0.005203426],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023755143,0.000016357637,0.000370907,0.000032559477,0.000010073286,0.000050767172,0.000762769,0.000082822626,0.000055177767,0.9057672,0.08166322,0.0111644175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008211115,0.000054641936,0.0011026969,0.00039531407,0.000028434586,0.00025896542,0.001554003,0.00038545718,0.00019890799,0.5776901,0.41821158,0.00003783991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012289662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021553729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022842722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063728546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015691742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10827792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W647849777","doi":"","title":"The last word : media coverage of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Medical Entomology and Zoology","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Prism; Political science; Confusion; Queen (butterfly); Vignette; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.010813963663601699,"score_gpt":0.2443697981814992,"score_spread":0.2335558345178975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W647849777","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038394807,0.026847463,0.00041533986,0.065587156,0.008965141,0.00006177846,0.016161418,0.00029570903,0.87782645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10855293,0.019588832,0.0007467948,0.015751226,0.003691007,0.00005820247,0.0054243216,0.00030195632,0.8458846],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905807,0.000046230674,0.000024922696,0.00006499245,0.0006761708,0.00012971675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99736506,0.00043819065,0.00012577994,0.00006650539,0.0016907697,0.00031368202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037663034,0.0004577442,0.00029492902,0.0039095315,0.0073354375,0.0063307965,0.00082274264,0.001292943,0.08918654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040459326,0.00018613807,0.00014091023,0.008844834,0.0016414938,0.0019552417,0.00089253526,0.0014078625,0.007934713],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045713414,0.0000026891862,0.00026364837,0.00006065075,0.0000012018804,0.00004466377,0.0006881514,0.000041668867,0.000037602847,0.0092974445,0.9758705,0.013687241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001028108,0.0000014627811,0.0023983489,0.00020296217,0.0000025493723,0.000031625055,0.0010878535,0.00003865368,0.00007060796,0.00046996976,0.9956874,0.000007485201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96474034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9813374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08918654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033313952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027061269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29835874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W648427358","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511996399","title":"Judiciaries in Comparative Perspective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Context (archaeology); Democracy; Institution; Political science; Law; Set (abstract data type); Liberal democracy; Geography; Politics","score_opus":0.06642689445598031,"score_gpt":0.26940884672528104,"score_spread":0.20298195226930071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W648427358","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005229388,0.043071333,0.00081543106,0.010966668,0.00054937846,0.000006109134,0.000023351355,0.000006314695,0.93933195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8184991,0.0480875,0.0012526724,0.0067394734,0.0030106013,0.00010585326,0.00012081699,0.000048327605,0.12213567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99639124,0.00258422,0.000055040637,0.000214736,0.0004538203,0.0003008984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99810946,0.0012814589,0.000098145676,0.00014566541,0.00023467618,0.00013066494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023312045,0.0004264212,0.0004407968,0.0026972084,0.0062441165,0.007081087,0.0008574373,0.0024257828,0.008749342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038990278,0.00017539535,0.00021623707,0.002815637,0.018887732,0.0044853026,0.0024119297,0.0035386747,0.0008655418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029945534,0.0000055122514,0.00004317501,0.000021245147,0.000001532099,0.000020783786,0.002246886,0.000051646617,0.000019317271,0.9888629,0.0056967996,0.0030273094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008172759,0.000016858312,0.0010793045,0.0004332398,0.00000587697,0.00009076749,0.007479126,0.00014919159,0.00007315643,0.3990062,0.5916519,0.0000062391405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065494897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012124081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010140832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010140832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002391382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073577285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W66756667","doi":"","title":"The Debate about Judicial Supremacy in Canada and the United States: Defusing the Countermajoritarian Tension?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Political science; Tension (geology); Law; Judicial opinion; Judicial activism; Law and economics; Judicial review; Sociology; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.0062402002445559905,"score_gpt":0.23866788126017327,"score_spread":0.23242768101561728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W66756667","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08335788,0.028718192,0.0021074957,0.6675633,0.0023190922,0.0000332046,0.00010463414,0.00004147319,0.21575476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9057939,0.007480543,0.00067334645,0.07389151,0.0014962305,0.000025428228,0.0000361153,0.000042637417,0.010560297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98044294,0.0037287106,0.00047786493,0.0015974897,0.008990149,0.0047628484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9693561,0.015984714,0.0018354061,0.00069401297,0.0099955695,0.0021342312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016970197,0.00037155347,0.0010054576,0.0032268967,0.024240328,0.020707127,0.0032895866,0.011328709,0.002703555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052870847,0.00036081372,0.00045182544,0.004189602,0.03905605,0.0060101296,0.0037531382,0.013812529,0.00026558532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004366819,0.000013544917,0.0010904188,0.00008230768,0.000023508366,0.0001782273,0.009949736,0.00024356233,0.00018869598,0.9500809,0.024316562,0.013788801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018350451,0.0000632869,0.015334486,0.0014652701,0.00018256383,0.00026701557,0.03307863,0.001187162,0.0014687313,0.3045194,0.6420095,0.00024048882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90886265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94123393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91829157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08170846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15704837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5928391},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6889814725","doi":"10.26181/25706358","title":"The Judicialisation of Parliamentary Privilege in Canada: A Cautionary Tale","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"La Trobe University","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Supreme court; Privilege (computing); Doctrine; Charter; Autonomy; Common law; Constitution; Legislation","score_opus":0.009975819475236727,"score_gpt":0.21343572423514376,"score_spread":0.20345990475990702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6889814725","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01213354,0.077473566,0.0039188354,0.7540478,0.0066949828,0.00010387128,0.0006166281,0.00016273161,0.14484806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4006751,0.07101701,0.00991873,0.4211876,0.005915806,0.00018782094,0.00035753238,0.0003719362,0.09036852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98022723,0.0029500562,0.0007666493,0.0022362594,0.009270355,0.004549446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97016174,0.011065607,0.0007957816,0.0010749444,0.014888165,0.0020137625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013056418,0.00077716826,0.0014760843,0.0038265332,0.02925932,0.017038392,0.00587221,0.012214281,0.0040404103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044027563,0.0008263289,0.0013206683,0.004862791,0.02195156,0.006757649,0.0037793147,0.02150356,0.00072161434],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006797261,0.000034936915,0.0026766213,0.00034759878,0.00008537546,0.0007327189,0.009541335,0.00067600753,0.000334765,0.6819728,0.26538515,0.038144592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009177778,0.00003522077,0.009344315,0.0016628623,0.00016180261,0.00031135938,0.0062913485,0.0015177694,0.0006603332,0.10295556,0.8766406,0.00032713218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9920838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9949621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8472911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15270892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26747128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98273754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6889961234","doi":"10.32920/22223386.v1","title":"Tribunal administration and the duty to consult: A study of the National Energy Board","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Jurisdiction; Duty; Principle of legality; Transparency (behavior); Appeal; Supreme court; Administration (probate law)","score_opus":0.04563958397095269,"score_gpt":0.33337553398441716,"score_spread":0.28773595001346447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6889961234","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87518644,0.0008999488,0.00038987654,0.011585608,0.0000608224,0.000029995203,0.000034278277,0.0000041879894,0.11180888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99299765,0.00018155895,0.000068790985,0.0015425874,0.000015429214,0.000014684168,0.00001341269,0.0000052441765,0.0051606386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98380417,0.0084548285,0.00044469236,0.00088563387,0.002917358,0.0034933924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95970535,0.023934059,0.0067224666,0.0012388013,0.003862479,0.0045368853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015476248,0.000090222384,0.00035272198,0.0018975991,0.011192819,0.0069466108,0.0013568423,0.0028402668,0.010267692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051667858,0.00030333092,0.00028280984,0.002554658,0.007859632,0.0039286674,0.0038395354,0.0036407595,0.00088038726],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030704233,0.0017027864,0.3324764,0.00015098337,0.00009239556,0.001727562,0.22817446,0.00063494116,0.0007156802,0.35159454,0.02167871,0.06074456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008841926,0.0002719158,0.4183318,0.00069039024,0.00006311854,0.00057705777,0.4193238,0.0012081419,0.0003479747,0.014862784,0.14413255,0.0001020192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1326315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19873166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9890881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01091187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01086628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26371896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6894158475","doi":"10.5287/ora-44nk8629x","title":"Methods of deference in human rights adjudication","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Adjudication; Judicial deference; Standard of review; Legislature; Human rights; Interpretation (philosophy); Judicial review; Compromise","score_opus":0.05369077422976509,"score_gpt":0.359695994640522,"score_spread":0.3060052204107569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6894158475","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041701505,0.0011317804,0.9676133,0.0032238255,0.00041020912,0.000815164,0.00009215294,0.00030449807,0.022239026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12757653,0.0009978113,0.85521734,0.0010234916,0.000725456,0.0028828562,0.00010080948,0.00032052406,0.011155156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.77912164,0.16400024,0.00826709,0.012205475,0.03343259,0.0029729025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.67266726,0.24326806,0.013440353,0.049469873,0.0196258,0.0015286738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1307954,0.0013110028,0.0022427943,0.008240247,0.005394631,0.014645057,0.006971051,0.005268511,0.0076354146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2865306,0.0021073972,0.002428159,0.00526083,0.025043538,0.013347158,0.015509413,0.011480291,0.0038005835],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010373086,0.00005314282,0.00062906434,0.00028031968,0.00004448298,0.00010180857,0.007731613,0.0013043121,0.000763474,0.891635,0.002299711,0.09505338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017389357,0.00013524941,0.0006275369,0.00081213604,0.000061940955,0.00025643152,0.0014310998,0.009898458,0.0022878826,0.9246885,0.05946627,0.00016056505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002527144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003137534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1307954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00610204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009738822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6917205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6898998839","doi":"10.58079/qt0r","title":"Book : Law Reform in Plural Societies","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OpenEdition (OpenEdition)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plural; Law reform; Reform Act; Public law","score_opus":0.029715568955934694,"score_gpt":0.29663847266674404,"score_spread":0.26692290371080934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6898998839","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019659763,0.16395243,0.0022398771,0.1038224,0.021306561,0.00006784277,0.00036525435,0.00015266181,0.7061271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0326067,0.044117734,0.0010081044,0.015610907,0.010848095,0.00006119008,0.00025082767,0.00009379031,0.8954026],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995976,0.0001042061,0.000019944016,0.00005103419,0.0001887141,0.000038522074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934226,0.00030320775,0.000056715882,0.000051280764,0.00015624656,0.00009018803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006068225,0.00040824234,0.00032041068,0.00082317,0.0016545117,0.003404411,0.00046161463,0.0016548171,0.037491124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021240371,0.00016294431,0.00023617093,0.0013278346,0.0022177126,0.0032748918,0.0010982052,0.0022214118,0.007852586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009104883,0.00002971027,0.0001025843,0.00015159255,0.0000026342068,0.00002168606,0.00059442595,0.00018734827,0.000096686344,0.13311806,0.82696444,0.038721733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003896773,0.000006578435,0.0002777829,0.00019124741,0.0000015445546,0.000027260072,0.00017686364,0.00005538349,0.000036264166,0.01705647,0.9821638,0.0000027808428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004532236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01166296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037491124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026953109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035714386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12542027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6906082455","doi":"10.15468/dl.remdxq","title":"Occurrence Download","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Global Biodiversity Information Facility","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Matching (statistics); Range (aeronautics); Identification (biology)","score_opus":0.019509517739783173,"score_gpt":0.25679506607906827,"score_spread":0.23728554833928509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6906082455","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004248255,0.000022836934,0.000039653296,0.000034783432,0.000009793673,0.000004873986,0.9989587,0.00027974276,0.00060715765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00014962727,0.000028298018,0.0001690133,0.00003813202,0.000002919611,0.0000375835,0.99903774,0.00010640776,0.00043027117],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999042,0.00014036363,0.00012050675,0.0003185132,0.00022747574,0.00015116778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978223,0.00060882233,0.00021124256,0.00055854185,0.0005314445,0.0002676146],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010002876,0.0018103841,0.0014525688,0.0046223057,0.000969702,0.0024463558,0.0027466973,0.0019121233,0.13517642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005545992,0.00085018855,0.0010411489,0.009760178,0.00044943154,0.0019919635,0.0021969134,0.0020942749,0.18878183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024585677,0.0000112850885,0.0003466751,0.00038925203,0.000012386423,0.000012545442,0.00002090529,0.000115073984,0.00008493095,0.00041797064,0.99736243,0.0012019355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007352773,0.000006697065,0.0018708418,0.00016387216,0.000011925199,0.000031587413,0.00007007058,0.00015178043,0.00016368144,0.0008169389,0.9966241,0.0000149726075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02277169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039094903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8648236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016011808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023293542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4522102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6908272995","doi":"10.25909/28891115","title":"NO AMENDMENT? NO PROBLEM: JUDGES, “INFORMAL AMENDMENT,” AND THE EVOLUTION OF CONSTITUTIONAL MEANING IN THE FEDERAL DEMOCRACIES OF AUSTRALIA, CANADA, INDIA, AND THE UNITED STATES","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The University of Adelaide","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Democracy; Meaning (existential); Original meaning; Politics; Ideal (ethics)","score_opus":0.012017315651333514,"score_gpt":0.22089195043704304,"score_spread":0.20887463478570953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6908272995","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6432408,0.0028395825,0.0042462046,0.045233723,0.00029080495,0.00004390182,0.000043500353,0.000045624423,0.3040159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99541265,0.00014676909,0.00036553948,0.0006790069,0.000027226586,0.0000095650075,0.0000075239673,0.000011734726,0.0033399793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891322,0.005420299,0.00018951703,0.0009441461,0.0021752606,0.0021385106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99019146,0.0049960557,0.0012009302,0.00087870145,0.0017814785,0.0009513953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008160821,0.00014878967,0.00032724655,0.0013764474,0.013250432,0.011633739,0.0009544488,0.0021381124,0.0017551567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027763253,0.00021346948,0.00025807825,0.0015725916,0.053489465,0.004214263,0.004114352,0.005582511,0.00012439913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003876891,0.00002751433,0.0052987537,0.000021004846,0.000008386636,0.00018571722,0.075046204,0.00037492535,0.00024292857,0.9033665,0.0020912734,0.013297978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010684034,0.00011246428,0.048281502,0.00035501798,0.00006748066,0.00022931621,0.102786504,0.0022375325,0.0011256933,0.60619855,0.23833491,0.00016435163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18783958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26016614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81216043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01886931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017274756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37349242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6925102727","doi":"10.17632/9cfcs73jm6.1","title":"Investigating the Association between Season of Birth and Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety in Adults","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Mendeley Data","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Season of birth; Anxiety; Depression (economics); Mental health; Association (psychology); Young adult","score_opus":0.027602691913719595,"score_gpt":0.3041274924178348,"score_spread":0.2765248005041152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6925102727","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99786395,0.0007880645,0.00010449696,0.00012919524,0.0000170078,0.000046567096,0.000638928,0.0000019386569,0.00040983444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980519,0.0006112479,0.0003973297,0.00012179294,0.000019573532,0.00009161659,0.0005375735,0.0000013099312,0.00016760288],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992386,0.00032393515,0.00013357663,0.00011624601,0.00008936433,0.00009832251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965222,0.0007973107,0.0016931861,0.00012266562,0.00047516747,0.00038943853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019105177,0.00015836675,0.00024085106,0.00050857785,0.00041586466,0.0004972182,0.00037045986,0.00038487723,0.0015318926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004462538,0.00023302318,0.000498741,0.00066677126,0.00017078075,0.0004369885,0.0005289569,0.00049725425,0.00018486968],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042905725,0.0000354701,0.9981183,0.000048450445,0.000038769525,0.000017968292,0.00017411406,0.000007210023,0.00006817976,0.0000075014646,0.000091948314,0.0013492379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028457684,0.00014916086,0.9991666,0.000024762963,0.000021602988,0.000068676156,0.0003646556,0.000020413758,0.000021899325,0.0000074997606,0.00015059218,0.000001333669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062149274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012896832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062149274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003050914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071902166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012357473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6930745473","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.14956241","title":"Ethics and professional Responsibility for a judge","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Professional responsibility; Legal ethics; Professional conduct; Judicial independence; Independence (probability theory); Ethical code; Professional ethics; Judicial opinion","score_opus":0.08197097784908297,"score_gpt":0.364674383478536,"score_spread":0.282703405629453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6930745473","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021370696,0.017463176,0.01968054,0.263623,0.0042975354,0.00009203563,0.000059587805,0.000071434755,0.67334205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8409658,0.007423053,0.008639527,0.04572685,0.003808211,0.00013856706,0.000053213935,0.000097557626,0.09314716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9741279,0.012774516,0.0010324907,0.0032290998,0.0065363175,0.002299662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844061,0.0062523466,0.0014405826,0.0009814294,0.003655132,0.0032644188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010876196,0.00035378025,0.0004050228,0.0009369074,0.010650219,0.009052385,0.0011279001,0.0072310353,0.0044937017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020374654,0.00033163888,0.00023709801,0.00067295413,0.03678014,0.0049775583,0.0047616763,0.0075584613,0.0013897411],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008147026,0.000021011165,0.00067079166,0.00005237772,0.000004796566,0.00016388946,0.015802756,0.00012586566,0.00018512084,0.94284683,0.027099954,0.013018551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012681198,0.000034436667,0.0014323669,0.00043831655,0.000007792524,0.00039208765,0.005848054,0.0002992365,0.0002279704,0.41517115,0.5761006,0.00003521625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011759083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016228355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011759083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009566738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018894156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069411874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6931709741","doi":"10.5683/sp3/8hvbss","title":"Labour Force Survey, February 2024 [Canada] [Rebased 2025]","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Borealis","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unemployment; Earnings; Government (linguistics); Wage; Current Population Survey; Public use; Duration (music); Survey data collection","score_opus":0.02851245371137181,"score_gpt":0.296443538620598,"score_spread":0.26793108490922624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6931709741","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008957945,0.0020315035,0.0004919205,0.0063369414,0.002531655,0.0010159917,0.9307043,0.00036157313,0.055630233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010494664,0.0057717212,0.0041278657,0.010406596,0.00052025134,0.0025883112,0.8136829,0.00035012118,0.15205748],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951219,0.00031298547,0.00037772505,0.00035757257,0.0029467195,0.00088316854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98045176,0.00033508748,0.00030643627,0.00032027566,0.017506856,0.0010795643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039481907,0.0011889192,0.0010763417,0.0036821002,0.0029584428,0.0030084837,0.0035532063,0.0016283233,0.046118207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016770646,0.0010925797,0.001259885,0.008584573,0.0006077008,0.0015095004,0.0014094716,0.003680236,0.028540174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020957605,0.000009394691,0.0012370661,0.0001536313,0.0000086237515,0.000009754802,0.000034069824,0.000049356004,0.000020252379,0.0005124932,0.9901642,0.0077802152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004565277,0.000014388603,0.060656823,0.0004805553,0.00002654097,0.000018355538,0.00025612314,0.00012002098,0.00005587475,0.00026296696,0.93802863,0.000034184453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.988332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9907498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049783666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.049783666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13283794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36120743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6949870997","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.7875135","title":"FIGURES 73–78 in Morphological and molecular characterization of twenty-five new Diploneis species (Bacillariophyta) from Lake Tanganyika and its surrounding areas","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Museum of Nature","funders":"","keywords":"Holotype; Scale (ratio); Characterization (materials science); Single specimen; Morphology (biology)","score_opus":0.04273538230748023,"score_gpt":0.25965323922320643,"score_spread":0.2169178569157262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6949870997","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74247885,0.0032832636,0.0059720012,0.0006113515,0.00031010606,0.0006116758,0.056376297,0.0008130255,0.18954343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8677391,0.0011297979,0.0100176055,0.000171002,0.000037649013,0.00035583432,0.040355593,0.00018262606,0.08001087],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999509,0.000002722057,0.0000065759573,0.000018163035,0.000012675198,0.00000901151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99993086,0.0000086148,0.000022105773,0.0000069459593,0.000014582124,0.00001698549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00004991886,0.0002766441,0.00011490006,0.0016518924,0.0006470692,0.00021833593,0.00025962692,0.00019184571,0.05232027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016135782,0.00012915347,0.00015192942,0.0015128367,0.0003177547,0.00028793284,0.00039392733,0.00026745885,0.0052658003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011764625,0.00012609382,0.163303,0.0019355344,0.00011893391,0.0058007445,0.007807908,0.0012907162,0.33098096,0.003167259,0.09290072,0.39139166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003357092,0.00009010842,0.8242251,0.0002035567,0.000057281526,0.0027846752,0.0015880407,0.0003858766,0.0073033464,0.00032929404,0.162971,0.00002815738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022349877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06040165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05232027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005834948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026779692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17502874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6950146855","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.16810296","title":"JUDGING THE JUDGES: REVIEWING THE 2025 JUDICIAL EXPERIENCE MANDATE AMID PERSISTING COMPETENCY GAPS AND JUDICIAL ERRORS IN THE INDIAN JUDICIARY","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Competence (human resources); Mandate; Supreme court; Jurisdiction; Judicial activism; CLARITY; Accountability; Judicial discretion","score_opus":0.058125023407734365,"score_gpt":0.3105647216076861,"score_spread":0.25243969819995177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6950146855","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9176458,0.0048114127,0.0021474496,0.024818469,0.00061602297,0.00006324709,0.00009317391,0.000024149953,0.049780197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99674326,0.000769429,0.00048517005,0.00072429073,0.00016821524,0.000012634878,0.000026721265,0.00000660916,0.0010637067],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9822521,0.0079176,0.0013542362,0.000977171,0.0053764437,0.002122477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8952882,0.0631604,0.009427785,0.0027292548,0.026644278,0.0027500493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02124297,0.00018056833,0.00039323152,0.0036242416,0.005268066,0.008386605,0.0018361624,0.0016553135,0.0010634545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07455397,0.00023160779,0.00032161956,0.0021178932,0.008939268,0.0061814934,0.0039509404,0.004065131,0.00018782805],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022058273,0.00021738766,0.11884821,0.0007619978,0.000046458008,0.004574198,0.63584816,0.00091096276,0.0017043242,0.08030227,0.016004805,0.14056061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006758789,0.00022590993,0.16326238,0.001766036,0.00006527143,0.0009242422,0.74378365,0.0011678074,0.0014236476,0.008485296,0.078791305,0.00009762642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02501023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060330685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02501023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008276368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010929248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11234492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6964785658","doi":"10.25949/19435487.v1","title":"Legal and political protections of fundamental rights: strengths and weaknesses : a comparative study","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fundamental rights; Legislation; Legislature; Judicial review; Charter; Politics; Human rights; Strengths and weaknesses; Constitutional review","score_opus":0.048361334189488216,"score_gpt":0.36803899222675895,"score_spread":0.3196776580372707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6964785658","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30693033,0.04758151,0.002293886,0.00909514,0.00015441356,0.0000644036,0.00023188668,0.0000094853085,0.633639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799566,0.014174529,0.0005277082,0.00044844564,0.00008373399,0.00002462627,0.00008027883,0.000012365165,0.0046917796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99392265,0.003237033,0.00017715694,0.00031761112,0.0016896302,0.00065593753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97382903,0.019667516,0.0016749317,0.0007823069,0.0034676774,0.0005785333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009033426,0.00016233423,0.00050817226,0.005899256,0.0039186114,0.0063775936,0.00096803776,0.0014241264,0.0076731034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020719238,0.0002109613,0.00033539903,0.010933841,0.009410482,0.006809411,0.0024905899,0.0015604226,0.00031584073],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001901444,0.00014673574,0.025569262,0.0012771627,0.00007362036,0.0007205057,0.068542786,0.0004028412,0.00044679525,0.7867754,0.0048015965,0.111053266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000630972,0.00036222948,0.21515009,0.005460421,0.00031532417,0.0017774283,0.23212107,0.0014638214,0.0009732898,0.085225016,0.4570065,0.00008171337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04383711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.074768886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04383711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011131063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047376147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.087163866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6977394580","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.7841156","title":"JUDICIALIZAÇÃO E ATIVISMO JUDICIAL EM PERSPECTIVA: UMA ANÁLISE A PARTIR DAS EXPERIÊNCIAS DAS SUPREMAS CORTES DO BRASIL E DO CANADÁ","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Supreme court; Legislature; Judicial activism; Scope (computer science); Portuguese; Judicial opinion; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.046239730608450665,"score_gpt":0.3303817744928082,"score_spread":0.28414204388435754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6977394580","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85890985,0.0053850557,0.0006627636,0.0082408395,0.00007436548,0.000051990628,0.000104199404,0.000014781693,0.12655626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957852,0.001368848,0.00011122109,0.00018623025,0.000011006026,0.000005912783,0.000014381038,0.000004588073,0.002512541],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959065,0.001312177,0.00008593735,0.0003050762,0.0014482442,0.0009419758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940141,0.003842217,0.00053047854,0.00021295062,0.0009787903,0.00042148103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041086045,0.00020416226,0.00047010215,0.0025593732,0.014631158,0.008945979,0.0009316972,0.001146706,0.0020362427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011173615,0.0002081866,0.00015755865,0.0040966636,0.020422034,0.0018648622,0.003038673,0.0018453721,0.000092554576],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029414134,0.000025790338,0.009575225,0.00021795125,0.000011269103,0.0010045532,0.8478599,0.00014017905,0.0014857961,0.11392416,0.0029236742,0.022802092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007270068,0.00003101468,0.03383427,0.00050704926,0.000025513391,0.00038290734,0.8287274,0.00023276989,0.00063221663,0.0038782686,0.13170658,0.000034772445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7271162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8881784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27288377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02511994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04142083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54898167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6980341073","doi":"","title":"Bypassing the Judge: A Manifestation of the Legitimacy Crisis of Judicial Review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship (California Digital Library)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Judicial review; Distrust; Opposition (politics); Judicial activism; Politics; Sovereignty; Democracy; Rule of law","score_opus":0.019134660596205257,"score_gpt":0.2738816842365844,"score_spread":0.2547470236403791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6980341073","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41213056,0.0045488966,0.00913075,0.27409673,0.00081446656,0.00008651549,0.00004526005,0.00015853044,0.29898822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98875976,0.0005075997,0.0005856101,0.0056024203,0.000291211,0.000026164562,0.000008896273,0.000039153496,0.004179232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9686602,0.01883807,0.0009231641,0.0020958183,0.006508345,0.0029743544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9400688,0.042150345,0.0068559344,0.0032095814,0.005284715,0.0024305666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017637622,0.00027243575,0.0007941104,0.0019995454,0.02079853,0.018354189,0.0016980569,0.008638639,0.0021172743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063687794,0.00046838808,0.00029885946,0.00217813,0.05336526,0.00989639,0.008412619,0.012970326,0.00041676516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034320725,0.000051509323,0.0018426867,0.00006078596,0.000008878576,0.0012679338,0.1331221,0.0001251763,0.000872359,0.83620024,0.0120278075,0.0143861985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001372501,0.00012292019,0.0069444813,0.0006666857,0.00003609552,0.0024568934,0.13350706,0.0018103343,0.0017230434,0.47895202,0.3734663,0.00017690366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01615297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016510274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02079853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010574031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010988627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09327781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6982061401","doi":"","title":"God's Lake, Manitoba","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Saint Mary's University Institutional Repository (Saint Mary's University)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identification (biology); Natural (archaeology); Work (physics); Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.0170124527344129,"score_gpt":0.1984489225508419,"score_spread":0.181436469816429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6982061401","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09244698,0.003333218,0.0006330891,0.007243836,0.00039032436,0.00031339523,0.014698216,0.0004957747,0.8804452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.053131923,0.0017536369,0.00067301193,0.000717801,0.000019352865,0.00008744831,0.0016632339,0.00012868602,0.941825],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997799,0.000024956596,0.0000063857783,0.000031672476,0.00007330942,0.000083795945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992993,0.000079703066,0.000031191816,0.000042945067,0.00037947876,0.00016731264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032877197,0.00046514877,0.00028609042,0.001266044,0.014090238,0.0031787085,0.001249018,0.00072567695,0.14819652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011208128,0.0004568031,0.00019949977,0.0037227005,0.0010626222,0.00086341694,0.0015249178,0.0011325998,0.013058912],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003170804,0.00034576768,0.04691237,0.0008638642,0.000052526517,0.0028847617,0.018177193,0.0005870177,0.0021070212,0.049920727,0.6541909,0.22364081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042442978,0.000023539731,0.07530619,0.00035319047,0.000024799494,0.000324911,0.018990481,0.00029408996,0.0008669435,0.0020201544,0.90172684,0.000026395475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8889599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9855016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14819652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010053622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031155605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49576676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6983202146","doi":"","title":"Making sense of who we are: justification, community and judgment in section 7 of the canadian charter","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Charter; Adjudication; Constitutional theory; Constitutional law; Normative; Obligation; Argument (complex analysis); Equal Protection Clause; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.05222647893363846,"score_gpt":0.2871791781056263,"score_spread":0.23495269917198786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6983202146","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062029954,0.014112776,0.013020977,0.36088926,0.0016035785,0.00015766748,0.00017617164,0.0001113807,0.54789823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9289794,0.0031830834,0.008200329,0.022214113,0.00034279775,0.00007446952,0.00006769969,0.000075097836,0.036863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.974115,0.009087052,0.00065412855,0.0021437118,0.009201842,0.0047982633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98532826,0.007311099,0.0007641271,0.0004236029,0.004637957,0.0015350619],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018503424,0.00069852726,0.0008698807,0.002889456,0.039952673,0.026251573,0.0032031578,0.00970926,0.0026547508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02586173,0.0005790496,0.0005408324,0.003093472,0.07905778,0.007355098,0.0066189757,0.0119686965,0.00032004583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007295872,0.000005761649,0.0005636383,0.000028625167,0.000005208245,0.00014149482,0.028700355,0.00019068464,0.0000776,0.946016,0.016046472,0.008216899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018769653,0.000014309381,0.0033051723,0.0006448582,0.000042617947,0.000118467564,0.055453166,0.0011683941,0.00044712683,0.5799708,0.35862702,0.00018934565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94737923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9752485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.129572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.129572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2293373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9401151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6984767347","doi":"","title":"President’s Column","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Association (psychology); Curse; Energy (signal processing); Appeal","score_opus":0.05492148165875414,"score_gpt":0.23027678776085644,"score_spread":0.17535530610210232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6984767347","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004329787,0.011757585,0.00023692207,0.11638651,0.26161668,0.00024202975,0.0026846302,0.00070377835,0.605939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014551502,0.0035720696,0.00011937136,0.028315544,0.03029826,0.00009689295,0.0008228097,0.00014242301,0.93517756],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987042,0.00007304278,0.00006364843,0.00023967697,0.00068725995,0.00023213233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976337,0.00016196942,0.000098345256,0.000107867636,0.0011281163,0.00086991413],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011064078,0.0012994318,0.0008371566,0.001201001,0.0020169031,0.005582042,0.00110165,0.0058192452,0.42733717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004392351,0.00047442561,0.00076428655,0.00092316,0.0004792584,0.0025468392,0.0014972663,0.00524215,0.40110418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004896129,0.0000068584804,0.000029514094,0.000017918588,6.4226055e-7,0.0000148478375,0.0000031274383,0.0000036285146,0.000022241618,0.00028832394,0.9931765,0.006431503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033386707,0.0000055088544,0.00020281819,0.00004087854,7.387169e-7,0.00001821194,0.000011770079,0.0000074683007,0.000013680485,0.00008807042,0.99960524,0.0000022608465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004121617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0113094775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42733717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001375137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037643444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81683403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6985111866","doi":"","title":"9781040016657.pdf","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OAPEN (The OAPEN Foundation)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Reading (process); Institution; Politics; Analytics; Perspective (graphical); Work (physics); Empirical legal studies","score_opus":0.027636981050615732,"score_gpt":0.31883330081033656,"score_spread":0.2911963197597208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6985111866","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021597906,0.0016832823,0.00097372377,0.0011543374,0.0020717378,0.000052015723,0.0059766024,0.0008077031,0.9870645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011299428,0.0017127948,0.0007466241,0.00033993623,0.00034407634,0.00005283294,0.0031776265,0.0007233486,0.99177295],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932384,0.000055056888,0.000023602432,0.000082593135,0.0004596345,0.00005531098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982735,0.00040112226,0.000059630886,0.00021113703,0.0007838695,0.00027080582],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056350586,0.00065946346,0.0005429255,0.0033384236,0.002062661,0.010369835,0.0010096403,0.0011175163,0.72639614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037615558,0.00040163682,0.00043163786,0.0076576993,0.0010627679,0.0032055886,0.0027143955,0.0018484789,0.5425281],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045882125,0.000007192682,0.000068250345,0.000093270515,0.0000015226392,0.000018683142,0.000106305466,0.000043011547,0.000090480324,0.005501749,0.9136705,0.0803944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.2661404e-7,0.0000012826436,0.00015903027,0.00006074522,4.6326412e-7,0.000016921298,0.000052671774,0.000013509825,0.000025826888,0.00040219657,0.9992642,0.0000022750223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025256336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04701986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27360386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024884546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030255616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39026266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987185096","doi":"","title":"Seeking the Court's Advice: The Politics of the Canadian Reference Power","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Power (physics); Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.028182442781601955,"score_gpt":0.2705308502511159,"score_spread":0.24234840746951394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987185096","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037548035,0.005485727,0.0013829211,0.24465005,0.00075337803,0.000046449524,0.00022849785,0.000051810624,0.7098531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.837434,0.0032192746,0.0013798967,0.032144725,0.0004406618,0.000051764062,0.00007408951,0.00018923946,0.12506637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98178226,0.003972473,0.00025783095,0.0016603756,0.0066870525,0.005639976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9805086,0.007839385,0.00049806153,0.0005634158,0.0076418356,0.0029486325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013399057,0.00053829415,0.0009695852,0.0045894957,0.07311871,0.026524575,0.004154977,0.01445552,0.020903854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040734615,0.00088672625,0.00060115627,0.007102314,0.04031829,0.007919488,0.00534682,0.013956727,0.0014118536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036270263,0.00001357613,0.0007406056,0.000030516594,0.00001098917,0.00013310504,0.019981101,0.00019824576,0.000103203136,0.9008831,0.06667415,0.011195204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009783151,0.000027302302,0.0082697375,0.00056198175,0.00010194564,0.00015143727,0.06434858,0.0012859775,0.000447715,0.21402462,0.7103812,0.0003016525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99460334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99721813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79642826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20357174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25135306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9237439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989548983","doi":"","title":"Bench Strength: How Powerful Are Supreme Courts in Common Law Countries Really?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syracuse University Libraries (Syracuse University)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Typology; Supreme court; Judicial review; Common law; Enforcement; Judicial independence; Power (physics); Constitutional review","score_opus":0.011734448479655997,"score_gpt":0.2097868470120489,"score_spread":0.1980523985323929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989548983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72509253,0.006990097,0.001958363,0.014722721,0.00016397171,0.0000222274,0.00013764849,0.00002560237,0.25088686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99729985,0.0006355521,0.0001315941,0.00050982716,0.0000418422,0.000003058706,0.000023697003,0.0000062271693,0.0013484041],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946621,0.002326556,0.00018274997,0.0006110523,0.0009042015,0.0013134038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9800118,0.00826557,0.0048467433,0.001190904,0.0034865115,0.0021985203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058377297,0.00016951628,0.0004669373,0.0051134527,0.0051735835,0.013739846,0.0009616406,0.0014598075,0.004937931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021429615,0.00027450518,0.00020872959,0.0057789534,0.014810385,0.010681456,0.003237777,0.0023021288,0.00035045246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076842225,0.000048243728,0.12136651,0.000163035,0.00011247265,0.000805313,0.047264706,0.0007611721,0.0005973397,0.7626534,0.0062498897,0.059901018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046989077,0.00027975193,0.5084983,0.0012983576,0.00026898322,0.0011661896,0.14930911,0.0012324238,0.00205744,0.1406972,0.1949517,0.000193541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01748689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027718099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01748689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005281379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039392444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03831923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989963950","doi":"","title":"Charter Decisions in the McLachlin Era: Collegiality and Ideology at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Voting; Ideology; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice","score_opus":0.024704683993240623,"score_gpt":0.2621653411425994,"score_spread":0.23746065714935874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989963950","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9506571,0.0008120647,0.00014676957,0.009007908,0.000067773304,0.000022561268,0.00018403903,0.00000762126,0.039094124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99592483,0.00015262581,0.000038302176,0.0003204929,0.000014118346,0.0000028176194,0.00003708963,0.0000036946137,0.0035060577],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952856,0.00044411825,0.000061540835,0.00039037445,0.001611526,0.0022069395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921029,0.0013353105,0.0011423134,0.00016005978,0.0025774878,0.002681815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027218743,0.00012359099,0.00039971748,0.0026125046,0.023037232,0.006994688,0.001396643,0.0015770203,0.004623631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011239695,0.00021869491,0.0002722984,0.0039275833,0.0069582285,0.0011554522,0.0024356204,0.0030276969,0.00023983385],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003694994,0.00032573257,0.5228995,0.0001075038,0.00015261327,0.0009985422,0.22329411,0.001678425,0.0017633715,0.12401226,0.038740143,0.08565831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003609955,0.0000790797,0.8265896,0.00015992497,0.000059466303,0.00007173463,0.09969641,0.0011864643,0.0006018354,0.003943957,0.067452155,0.00012322221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9921977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8830461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.116953894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07678221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84856385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6990320469","doi":"","title":"Decoding the Court: Legal Data Insights from the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"BiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Politics; Analytics; Empirical legal studies; Reading (process); Jurisprudence; Legal research; Judicial review","score_opus":0.12742231598425657,"score_gpt":0.3487191286813308,"score_spread":0.22129681269707424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6990320469","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10657857,0.0315707,0.0100239115,0.06840264,0.0013672065,0.00015724936,0.032758348,0.0006348152,0.74850655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6968887,0.03461726,0.017195908,0.005381431,0.0004732916,0.00011700945,0.026116027,0.001215135,0.21799524],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981844,0.0002068045,0.000039621238,0.00013317305,0.0012488677,0.00018710118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996309,0.0016568315,0.00013988637,0.00017154329,0.0014988444,0.00022388276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012146102,0.00043216857,0.00050009746,0.005042799,0.00942226,0.013287165,0.0012907019,0.0010332409,0.008968028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010050926,0.00035443637,0.00027104578,0.021792466,0.005520475,0.003843701,0.0020213085,0.0021921124,0.0010173178],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025205562,0.000018717788,0.00797993,0.00038964988,0.000026538828,0.0005662129,0.10087321,0.0014957277,0.00047472265,0.27411926,0.44452065,0.16951026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004669457,0.0000040710524,0.01648048,0.00049688504,0.0000212438,0.000107460015,0.049217157,0.0017335362,0.00033999936,0.032651182,0.8988886,0.00005479744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98221797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99323905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06495099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06495099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07930673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4712546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6991696867","doi":"","title":"Ian Mulgrew: New data shows the need for legal reform in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Legislation; Work (physics); Legislature","score_opus":0.052444768299588176,"score_gpt":0.2836835375027224,"score_spread":0.23123876920313424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6991696867","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031814434,0.009540402,0.00053434825,0.84627587,0.0027066583,0.00007117872,0.0051479964,0.000085340616,0.10382378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4044623,0.019521851,0.0034622953,0.25772026,0.0012731754,0.00015135293,0.003548219,0.00029888534,0.3095616],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99253464,0.00050898973,0.00015140667,0.000505784,0.004386754,0.0019123649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9794183,0.004288091,0.00064571603,0.00046183655,0.011582833,0.0036032498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040778513,0.00042847713,0.0006669549,0.0031228526,0.018240254,0.010029394,0.002756728,0.00635079,0.034541138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020254325,0.00036065278,0.00059213117,0.00696813,0.004685183,0.004530872,0.0027113792,0.0074278843,0.0017545453],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006768408,0.00004911955,0.018086625,0.00022637463,0.000040468574,0.0003113334,0.005841224,0.0002328264,0.00022808807,0.052205488,0.8830743,0.039636385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003303229,0.000016654709,0.034658846,0.0003393414,0.00005658512,0.00006072364,0.019872265,0.00031847332,0.00048230484,0.011213881,0.9328332,0.000114616836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99253523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07224829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07224829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24931037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52420044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6991963703","doi":"","title":"Introduction, Symposium: The Evolution of Justice Anthony M. Kennedyâs Jurisprudence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly Commons (University of the Pacific)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Economic Justice; State (computer science); State supreme court; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.012689970900866057,"score_gpt":0.21577192095283382,"score_spread":0.20308195005196777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6991963703","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017653535,0.39654008,0.00051060284,0.4380961,0.10007657,0.000033029475,0.00016123838,0.000028579967,0.06278845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06252785,0.2926275,0.001233072,0.26722914,0.13401921,0.00013144015,0.0002350432,0.0001101371,0.24188666],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893206,0.0003635151,0.00006121461,0.00020379647,0.00035024114,0.00008922877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812967,0.00085168506,0.00013977347,0.00006506049,0.000600325,0.00021348531],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00214409,0.00034496022,0.0003024816,0.0012560472,0.0027395268,0.004003726,0.00065431924,0.002979735,0.0070818188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059711696,0.00033023173,0.0003175233,0.0009015395,0.002078273,0.0024810561,0.0011540414,0.004227085,0.002261935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014485922,0.000016620077,0.00034944835,0.00021966314,0.000007027605,0.00006796513,0.00057705276,0.000033769807,0.000321755,0.023794416,0.9544332,0.0201646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030749768,0.000007792973,0.0010482016,0.00032485632,0.0000066784337,0.000050619412,0.000232109,0.000013766036,0.000053957105,0.002536077,0.99571854,0.000004312735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012099132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030355114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012099132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037230914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033694296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027013004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6992281934","doi":"","title":"Law, ideology, and collegiality judicial behaviour in the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Collegiality; Work (physics); Judicial independence; Legislation","score_opus":0.03021138814584164,"score_gpt":0.28977026525364596,"score_spread":0.25955887710780434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6992281934","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98518133,0.00019497251,0.000047149922,0.0027445795,0.000016970413,0.000016637367,0.00006540347,0.0000034102954,0.011729675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978313,0.00008308102,0.000025978918,0.00023566202,0.000007734299,0.000003763883,0.000023201117,0.0000028371312,0.0017865183],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949279,0.00066303497,0.000116234994,0.00037944238,0.0014899989,0.002423337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97797966,0.0075581297,0.0025850367,0.00035381867,0.0052270396,0.006296247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036347017,0.00016531936,0.0005138088,0.0031260462,0.027804079,0.007996731,0.0019555693,0.0025118778,0.006056015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021578759,0.00032894252,0.0002746494,0.0044687684,0.008572236,0.0011590233,0.0021004844,0.00392969,0.00028684342],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035685548,0.00064147706,0.68232745,0.00008826418,0.00017645069,0.0010156941,0.18913268,0.0015053313,0.0013397528,0.074384674,0.0159212,0.033110145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007000767,0.000072134,0.80276835,0.00012493625,0.000075327414,0.000089569614,0.1684786,0.0018622932,0.00037484363,0.0045320797,0.021440076,0.00011178097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98744607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.996582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07921326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07921326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10233047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57473516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6992510589","doi":"","title":"Lolita Buckner Inniss to become dean of Colorado Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Work (physics); Feminist legal theory; Legal profession; Feminist theory; Feminism","score_opus":0.025067882242123366,"score_gpt":0.29370746923636143,"score_spread":0.26863958699423807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6992510589","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006121091,0.02391518,0.002105658,0.36159965,0.027354948,0.00026194277,0.00083086896,0.00065752695,0.57715315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011204668,0.0028017787,0.0005767187,0.012560899,0.0009564681,0.000056320085,0.00020577841,0.000082435996,0.971555],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839103,0.0001761395,0.000049078564,0.0003822793,0.0007240832,0.00027747048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933189,0.0003827323,0.0001358861,0.00019064762,0.0027497935,0.0032219826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015001384,0.00037590845,0.00060589984,0.0015025074,0.01047849,0.0044783372,0.00093119714,0.0030364809,0.17709364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037275618,0.00037302048,0.00029521933,0.0007669926,0.0010910466,0.0020736884,0.0019324806,0.005401287,0.04468565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010155344,0.000042867832,0.0012605253,0.000045010787,0.0000025343581,0.00011198383,0.00043389117,0.000031286003,0.00017905669,0.00846146,0.9675898,0.021831404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001812993,0.000008689256,0.0010217567,0.00006508936,0.0000016146869,0.00009313515,0.00065515615,0.00006063276,0.00013278481,0.0006970656,0.9972554,0.0000068773734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.080654465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23658207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17709364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00964052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014915364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59243727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6995673828","doi":"","title":"Practice, Principle, and Prerogative","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Portal (King's College London)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.06969430355157623,"score_gpt":0.43259389034346224,"score_spread":0.362899586791886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6995673828","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015065065,0.003799293,0.043633904,0.15687734,0.0006685168,0.00013283883,0.00006882334,0.00011549496,0.77963877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8814914,0.0016633956,0.018810738,0.010121906,0.00092767243,0.00057664077,0.00006386466,0.00019880707,0.086145595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9728544,0.017478801,0.0009462823,0.0025037294,0.004630416,0.0015863925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96717495,0.019390719,0.0016449208,0.006350605,0.0041006026,0.0013381315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030823486,0.00044685535,0.0007625874,0.0017375083,0.009769981,0.016684344,0.0027197136,0.009335821,0.009778943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048412547,0.000771399,0.00040827872,0.0020486778,0.074865066,0.012830632,0.006040137,0.011801988,0.0024876914],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002940706,0.0000069594066,0.000061152525,0.000009145621,8.1107544e-7,0.000006929967,0.0011467296,0.000016804326,0.000021022543,0.99508876,0.0017788035,0.0018599738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001866259,0.000013902813,0.00021735094,0.00012230992,0.0000029426626,0.000042838994,0.0026989477,0.00014006959,0.0001439364,0.9451039,0.051487092,0.000008100551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042609065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054313694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030823486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005533795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013934454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16301209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6995677290","doi":"","title":"Packing the Court? Judicial Appointment in the Next Presidential Administration","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Presidential system; Politics; Administrative law; Administration (probate law); Constitutional law; Separation of powers; Judicial review; Dozen","score_opus":0.0492007197137444,"score_gpt":0.2999306938626822,"score_spread":0.2507299741489378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6995677290","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029134365,0.004391333,0.00517146,0.412474,0.027418325,0.00031069253,0.00028251106,0.00039668664,0.5204206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5630809,0.0035602825,0.004901774,0.122336775,0.015332026,0.0004189946,0.00030206935,0.00050901773,0.2895582],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97982055,0.0077511985,0.00077763357,0.0016034946,0.002931547,0.0071155624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833287,0.006154519,0.0011057869,0.0011217853,0.0026354855,0.0056536943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015752628,0.00031129533,0.000583603,0.0009564889,0.021843417,0.017176202,0.0025521915,0.012436516,0.048786234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04205579,0.0012042663,0.000873007,0.0011470092,0.004316194,0.009575603,0.0056203697,0.01694029,0.010214934],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004805271,0.000118448734,0.0012281642,0.00006287166,0.0000082729775,0.0007616844,0.005113268,0.0001411836,0.0004401504,0.23722643,0.729288,0.0255635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004375345,0.00006578257,0.003825383,0.00023496772,0.0000117300815,0.00015586951,0.0083546275,0.00027592233,0.00045535353,0.016835537,0.9696619,0.000079186175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015503692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034574196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048786234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064733853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010716563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16320616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6995698657","doi":"","title":"Panel I: L’accès à la justice sous la Charte/Access to Justice under the Charter","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Economic Justice; Politics; Class (philosophy); Legislation","score_opus":0.0921098041541939,"score_gpt":0.3099839251516128,"score_spread":0.21787412099741893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6995698657","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016199151,0.00648641,0.0010426678,0.5000388,0.02011658,0.005003419,0.0038010406,0.00018818973,0.44712386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0771559,0.004034062,0.0023781827,0.3013315,0.014580082,0.004194175,0.0020102272,0.00022570789,0.5940901],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98229665,0.002031184,0.0010466233,0.0025966766,0.0057851234,0.006243663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9747127,0.0054595447,0.0013868613,0.0013167765,0.00750432,0.009619724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016697852,0.0011157295,0.0014529389,0.0013986856,0.017253907,0.012816519,0.0034411293,0.042428046,0.042901766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028488414,0.0013402438,0.0015481682,0.0018705229,0.004622198,0.005292669,0.006265465,0.02708093,0.008106303],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001682085,0.00020238008,0.0014308067,0.00018524157,0.000018162047,0.0005423978,0.0017011819,0.00016652221,0.0022755018,0.024147324,0.9563389,0.012823315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013846693,0.000079149366,0.017396457,0.0005544412,0.000022389497,0.00006895964,0.0019434264,0.0001589399,0.00056006317,0.003772962,0.9751617,0.0001430558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33184612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5365771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33184612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017359795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.072270714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65982914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6995760815","doi":"","title":"The Planned Overhaul of Israel’s Judiciary","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Multiculturalism; Economic Justice; Legislature; Government (linguistics); Human rights; Power (physics); Constitutional law","score_opus":0.024505537618747755,"score_gpt":0.2873569362516485,"score_spread":0.26285139863290075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6995760815","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01948999,0.001350268,0.0020050881,0.047232624,0.017528655,0.00033951708,0.0009059878,0.00035918507,0.9107886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13981944,0.00064262765,0.0011577529,0.0065631373,0.0060987105,0.00016406717,0.0009024233,0.00018757547,0.84446424],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935645,0.00006433858,0.000010454059,0.00008880706,0.0002186207,0.00026126078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999186,0.00003208744,0.000026749482,0.000037858936,0.000109047935,0.00060810684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009992932,0.00045458818,0.000172045,0.00040097596,0.004104591,0.003712925,0.0009895072,0.0020200019,0.11395228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009825648,0.00022593448,0.0002969993,0.00018778184,0.000757773,0.0014925865,0.003981298,0.0053324657,0.02691474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009357903,0.00017243526,0.0011678635,0.00004803342,0.000004077443,0.00041133424,0.0010207477,0.00015497972,0.0016845966,0.044726025,0.90113634,0.049379945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019769626,0.00007742085,0.0036099937,0.000045915243,9.871003e-7,0.00006891689,0.0007161061,0.00015268911,0.00024833975,0.0017971866,0.9932546,0.000008053409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044784816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0135797355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11395228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027432798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026133833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38120836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6996943013","doi":"","title":"Tort Law, Crown Liability, and the Rule of Law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Government (linguistics); Rule of law; Private law; Public law; Delict; Common law; Tort reform; Normative","score_opus":0.008275462525469627,"score_gpt":0.22162801749396552,"score_spread":0.2133525549684959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6996943013","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053003773,0.02506827,0.028398002,0.060901582,0.00075580773,0.00006434108,0.00007656061,0.00005789618,0.8316738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95091015,0.007361621,0.005734292,0.0062150094,0.0007440329,0.00005011469,0.000044883545,0.000026535721,0.028913265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99742365,0.000671928,0.000078556404,0.00034109215,0.00087979465,0.00060498493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969356,0.0016415179,0.00049126276,0.00026479934,0.00041396273,0.00025285556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023831292,0.00023945935,0.00031995645,0.0013721334,0.0046841274,0.0069656163,0.0012201791,0.0032983737,0.0045814253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048815426,0.0002004067,0.0004568717,0.0012391354,0.029102355,0.005169224,0.0026421982,0.004002165,0.0004328524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.7855254e-7,0.000002541825,0.00006876697,0.0000043026107,5.024898e-7,0.000012231948,0.00020491605,0.00008498026,0.0000092847085,0.99814904,0.00044625954,0.0010165438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003512389,0.0000062981626,0.0006304401,0.0000645541,0.0000036035717,0.00004311893,0.00044584318,0.0004796803,0.000047178462,0.9610833,0.037185285,0.0000072167213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11596165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08361797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8840383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012224371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009785807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23057336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6996943137","doi":"","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada's Multifactorial Approach to Deference in Judicial Review","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Supreme court; CLARITY; Judicial deference; Judicial review; Standard of review; Judicial activism; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy)","score_opus":0.010423367918749425,"score_gpt":0.2004248225095324,"score_spread":0.19000145459078296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6996943137","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06688872,0.022007536,0.065315105,0.49662375,0.0015485863,0.00041932764,0.00047744095,0.00017192136,0.34654763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9484679,0.003300732,0.016076224,0.017393086,0.0005495766,0.000096691816,0.000038567796,0.000029686971,0.0140474755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95910394,0.014393488,0.0013774835,0.0023833194,0.017632673,0.0051089893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.951856,0.025721418,0.0024253454,0.0020140156,0.014888828,0.0030944261],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025545746,0.0003884881,0.0004814048,0.0049415617,0.017094923,0.013508237,0.0021945762,0.0054929047,0.0017443747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055332683,0.0004891071,0.0005840659,0.004278574,0.03485892,0.0035191686,0.004242314,0.0083638625,0.00012953235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038421044,0.0000048514403,0.00069263595,0.00002102217,0.0000054214865,0.000034855097,0.0012583326,0.00030722914,0.000059351227,0.9893623,0.0034074092,0.0048427526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055523546,0.000048815455,0.011257915,0.00051676016,0.00005544048,0.00020037292,0.0025240553,0.0047561093,0.0004898689,0.8440068,0.13594551,0.00014270355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85857034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9179735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14142966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10884979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19883005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7897642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6997221238","doi":"","title":"The use of scientific evidence in constitutional rights cases : research on the methods of the American and the Canadian judges","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Research Committee, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki; Amicus Therapeutics; Emory University","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Consequentialism; General interest","score_opus":0.5645017089828909,"score_gpt":0.5116963286610977,"score_spread":0.05280538032179316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6997221238","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2341085,0.063994154,0.028706327,0.07567085,0.0012214473,0.0028704687,0.0009061526,0.000082342594,0.5924398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96075493,0.012202255,0.012276843,0.0050572627,0.00026028248,0.0017116071,0.00018586197,0.00007142419,0.0074794902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.56139165,0.2797193,0.014579557,0.016143726,0.11174366,0.016422225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.26725706,0.576823,0.037692323,0.025465807,0.085601754,0.007160018],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.36380717,0.0013932302,0.0025719088,0.032685734,0.029821623,0.029848242,0.009053518,0.0070470423,0.0048420723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5753688,0.0023742793,0.0015913948,0.031657267,0.05832818,0.017275259,0.01652658,0.008069011,0.00041334724],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027795296,0.00012535337,0.030550536,0.00172929,0.000402438,0.0002742862,0.23838626,0.00041308903,0.00034400143,0.6548656,0.005297068,0.06733407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048698563,0.00029802296,0.10266843,0.018958736,0.0015788834,0.0006259326,0.2062647,0.0036076515,0.0035776317,0.27599722,0.38522804,0.00070778996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82986546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8579796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97017837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17836742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22558308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9529773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6997360440","doi":"","title":"Weak form of judicial review: apontamentos sobre o controle de constitucionalidade no Canadá, Nova Zelândia, Israel e Inglaterra","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Context (archaeology); Judicial review; Focus (optics); Sovereignty; Judicial activism","score_opus":0.01719723834834229,"score_gpt":0.2810840524884779,"score_spread":0.2638868141401356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6997360440","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2873915,0.013270774,0.0023168225,0.051870033,0.00044022416,0.00016704809,0.0010023245,0.000071361384,0.64346987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9524444,0.00286756,0.0005572174,0.001990971,0.00009478682,0.000022956925,0.000106394575,0.000016439371,0.041899234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994391,0.000471236,0.00014893446,0.00045724725,0.0027344383,0.00179707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922834,0.0016765745,0.0010191457,0.0003373362,0.0033665183,0.0013170055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003220956,0.00025965142,0.00034830047,0.0029802448,0.008774003,0.010120504,0.0012949549,0.0010220975,0.00414064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01141406,0.00023049397,0.00020790331,0.0032432107,0.0100465575,0.0015127518,0.0020393082,0.0027855437,0.00028042184],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005579618,0.000021650349,0.020011378,0.000157306,0.000027568845,0.00027490227,0.010635394,0.0003865869,0.00079919,0.9163145,0.018679436,0.032636352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005946816,0.000082772756,0.3292125,0.0007546762,0.00013601848,0.0005023027,0.02960366,0.0021519351,0.0022083852,0.10729562,0.52780426,0.00018845002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9060752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96455574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09392482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.060525186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09110237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.439143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6998895701","doi":"","title":"Between Judicial Activism and Political Cooperation: The Case of the Canadian Supreme Court","year":2018,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Cineca Institutional Research Information System (Tor Vergata University)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Supreme court; Judicial activism; Human rights; Judicial review; High Court; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.08271482685245418,"score_gpt":0.3150118525570199,"score_spread":0.23229702570456573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6998895701","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32684505,0.0036396463,0.0010536182,0.09566769,0.00017278583,0.000090725145,0.00018975383,0.000021470321,0.5723192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820195,0.00060786854,0.00014346695,0.0032356104,0.000072048475,0.000024577024,0.000020264535,0.000010636276,0.013865932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881764,0.0019405418,0.0001342175,0.0008404433,0.0016657371,0.0072426912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98907906,0.0054701674,0.0007024293,0.00035853215,0.0018008205,0.0025891103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068361075,0.00049636536,0.0007812283,0.0025587012,0.040559568,0.021051735,0.003548681,0.013994307,0.011331962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017170519,0.0005760591,0.00064810883,0.005727829,0.03103932,0.004455525,0.0066158473,0.012296505,0.0004328035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054572643,0.000053045118,0.0037061158,0.000036480436,0.00002598169,0.0005671985,0.027636286,0.0006191368,0.00016479183,0.94763947,0.013173776,0.006323035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039935164,0.00008642794,0.06001118,0.0006037179,0.00039367224,0.00047184702,0.2714371,0.0040893275,0.0008608376,0.31532747,0.3459359,0.00038317815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9852857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99342316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12858877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12858877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16816911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93298113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999399944","doi":"","title":"Contempt for Courts? Critics Denounce Disdain for Rule of Law in Ontario, U.S.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contempt; Opposition (politics); White (mutation); Rule of law","score_opus":0.06517594497430741,"score_gpt":0.3402755517972333,"score_spread":0.2750996068229259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999399944","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07435023,0.004340436,0.00055364467,0.52586293,0.0016256715,0.0000537349,0.0002191972,0.000076773234,0.3929173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67596245,0.0020770107,0.00028358574,0.111809544,0.0005358597,0.00003617579,0.00007940127,0.00007181083,0.20914416],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939126,0.0007648881,0.00015636883,0.00047638666,0.002697144,0.001992621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918324,0.002516357,0.0004902739,0.00032108222,0.0032298046,0.0016099432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041259485,0.00023208548,0.00024505198,0.0006623827,0.030671166,0.008750759,0.0013615652,0.010139481,0.0072488463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013116814,0.00048667248,0.00022859493,0.0011103494,0.014348874,0.001809472,0.0019147168,0.009737516,0.0008750799],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052524098,0.000027269263,0.013376987,0.00011330187,0.000021785867,0.0010549455,0.038667746,0.00016415073,0.00097233884,0.23371555,0.69109094,0.020742455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036922604,0.000023090395,0.02372677,0.00018174443,0.000039844992,0.00013264133,0.023797842,0.00018609874,0.0006311119,0.008870853,0.94230443,0.00006862349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9614565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9853125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053193938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053193938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0821954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38595086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999441021","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Law and Precedent : International Perspectives on Case-Based Reasoning","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"BiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional law; Constitutional economics; Constitutional court; Common law; Comparative law; Precedent; Public law; Human rights; Judicial independence; Argumentation theory; Supreme court","score_opus":0.08347819595326887,"score_gpt":0.366785463176605,"score_spread":0.2833072672233361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999441021","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019590324,0.08997457,0.013992338,0.022589326,0.0013127364,0.000025220226,0.000050316765,0.000036174573,0.87006027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4456668,0.27442655,0.031711083,0.013943758,0.007429759,0.00033823217,0.00043136138,0.00025731922,0.22579518],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968485,0.0018239319,0.00012372139,0.00022426457,0.00073408656,0.0002455814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99640614,0.0029906535,0.00012546801,0.0001647867,0.00019571761,0.00011715142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035284262,0.00072903495,0.00062491506,0.0032762713,0.0045438767,0.012307103,0.0013504795,0.0033654175,0.009530689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053264094,0.00045197774,0.0005977534,0.0056479657,0.021371776,0.0116835255,0.00294418,0.0067478623,0.0014707778],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.377357e-7,0.0000029856535,0.000012277948,0.000023915898,6.782619e-7,0.000016539963,0.0005489921,0.00011258228,0.000008905137,0.99332124,0.0033154765,0.0026356208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037212803,0.0000045459396,0.000073453724,0.00034922326,0.0000026569846,0.00006949805,0.0009269385,0.00025574813,0.000025606263,0.78539664,0.21288785,0.0000041394055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006089643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00658589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012307103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010085291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046956125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07317418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7002220714","doi":"","title":"Minimal Impairment: An Unreasonable Measure of the Justifiable Limits of Rights","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Proportionality (law); Charter; Legislature; Statutory law; Causation","score_opus":0.031611662584086944,"score_gpt":0.28267633650540364,"score_spread":0.2510646739213167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7002220714","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029694743,0.004412541,0.17753306,0.06619992,0.001457931,0.00029961197,0.00070692104,0.00029727555,0.7193981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91838294,0.0014366636,0.031193502,0.015215759,0.0017173619,0.00070304837,0.00030327233,0.00016707639,0.030880325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96201146,0.011065256,0.0023354928,0.0041946,0.017324172,0.0030691538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9581892,0.023556318,0.004156355,0.006038481,0.0067367144,0.0013229371],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027025884,0.0010584716,0.0013102251,0.0030711594,0.0040727286,0.011921659,0.0038712109,0.0063867983,0.009722111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07176621,0.000565529,0.0013409244,0.0016985735,0.04811094,0.01892032,0.009556419,0.011150899,0.0015209529],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014313817,0.000009845909,0.0003975687,0.000029063525,0.000005960534,0.000029149269,0.00054665806,0.00020311536,0.00009385007,0.9922504,0.0020442917,0.004375924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011993776,0.00006083627,0.001161224,0.00019731397,0.00002358695,0.00013226949,0.00050282635,0.0008528342,0.00052922155,0.9615354,0.03495071,0.000041733358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013841136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012352802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027025884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010990311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013738159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14292824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7002467979","doi":"","title":"\\n Guantanamera Boxe\\n . Canada [Québec], 2000, 52 minutes","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Érudit (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Government (linguistics); Identification (biology); Data collection","score_opus":0.007306311194454038,"score_gpt":0.17364958232833405,"score_spread":0.16634327113388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7002467979","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003179169,0.021669976,0.0006402688,0.03259936,0.009697896,0.00085260015,0.03202137,0.0015712173,0.89776814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022700117,0.0010929647,0.0001074772,0.002127161,0.00020679092,0.00010263629,0.0010367321,0.00012674952,0.9929294],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945205,0.000034718203,0.00002334585,0.00008921642,0.0002332492,0.000167332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989177,0.0001188622,0.00004360644,0.000051783434,0.0006353652,0.00023262769],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008155812,0.0010749666,0.0006939909,0.0011284654,0.008085813,0.004342753,0.0013616865,0.005053101,0.3558839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027777348,0.0008612908,0.0004725663,0.0023656907,0.0009898692,0.0013474853,0.0012487706,0.002785058,0.14570577],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027007676,0.0000054078646,0.0001580592,0.000038660597,0.000001909047,0.000035040975,0.000057720812,0.000027151806,0.000068791654,0.0007866416,0.9939594,0.004834128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013914177,0.0000034212453,0.0025427823,0.00006639678,0.000002577868,0.000008524714,0.00015595203,0.000029601395,0.000033091816,0.00012935587,0.99700767,0.0000067869405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89023143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97648346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3558839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015715476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017637819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91875345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7006922966","doi":"","title":"2006 Yearbook Photography","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Yearbook; Photography; Ballet; MAGIC (telescope); Ballet dancer","score_opus":0.014547206007808724,"score_gpt":0.27710879635629687,"score_spread":0.26256159034848814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7006922966","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00034250497,0.0011530867,0.0003019179,0.00039931416,0.0007461647,0.00006114747,0.006131869,0.000307274,0.9905566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019640203,0.0015191579,0.0005832553,0.00013773373,0.00017262145,0.000024409583,0.0049825334,0.00015288149,0.99046344],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99979943,0.000013495397,0.000008426057,0.000034009063,0.00012415345,0.000020448771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947304,0.00003076314,0.000019557205,0.000075256474,0.0003182437,0.0000832016],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002412098,0.0005965974,0.00028798665,0.0036641157,0.001442137,0.0024312863,0.0006250139,0.00048378608,0.6531695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005549981,0.00024783352,0.00024435998,0.0031876853,0.00022488245,0.0010059879,0.0006281952,0.00087919645,0.3387931],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008607908,0.000011883219,0.00007172214,0.00005443028,8.532515e-7,0.000030576033,0.00002470575,0.000027388818,0.00016124145,0.001223791,0.9607925,0.037592325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.6125027e-7,0.0000015708491,0.0005178743,0.00002469899,3.5696246e-7,0.00003701811,0.000024013809,0.000010230902,0.00003567232,0.000100120145,0.99924624,0.0000011780049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019153982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058243267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3468305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014853737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010756243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49471158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008197287","doi":"","title":"The appointment process for the Supreme Court of Canada : assessing the goals and performance of the Supreme Court selection panel","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Mspace (University of Manitoba)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Process (computing); Selection (genetic algorithm); Remand (court procedure); Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.023941077238513603,"score_gpt":0.24797440013252672,"score_spread":0.22403332289401312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008197287","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8482862,0.0010679604,0.0016801488,0.020004302,0.00027039016,0.0007583004,0.0021957138,0.00007797699,0.12565897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835302,0.0003766432,0.0019437334,0.0012380694,0.00004350131,0.00012057956,0.000706979,0.000027179905,0.012013148],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9809714,0.0042380583,0.00035606217,0.00077777106,0.009262607,0.0043940777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9240274,0.0210014,0.00346615,0.00142678,0.036283176,0.013795053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022033682,0.000220256,0.0003242797,0.0021263873,0.01600525,0.0074256137,0.0021448887,0.0021796757,0.003849771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.102319404,0.00034234909,0.00024709455,0.004129818,0.0019272747,0.0013877288,0.0020820324,0.003065491,0.00082240714],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00096573547,0.000677533,0.47740677,0.0002330315,0.00018594436,0.0006660235,0.047416598,0.0073998845,0.0018421833,0.07358739,0.21216457,0.17745438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010474145,0.00023033396,0.84188783,0.00023833937,0.00010352868,0.00005171181,0.040977206,0.0071103615,0.0017447246,0.0071916,0.10019156,0.00016809716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9655042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9903036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9265154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07348458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1866091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53317046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008509893","doi":"","title":"The Character Of Justice: Rhetoric, Law, And Politics In The Supreme Court Nomination Process","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sound Ideas (University of Puget Sound)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nomination; Supreme court; Character (mathematics); Politics; Process (computing)","score_opus":0.02840477057301762,"score_gpt":0.2683425536616649,"score_spread":0.23993778308864724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008509893","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013731096,0.33188742,0.016545596,0.19956996,0.006581101,0.000041045656,0.000044320073,0.000052592848,0.43154696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74440545,0.16248667,0.00607559,0.038427804,0.018189551,0.00016201062,0.00006958779,0.00023707605,0.029946273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9717532,0.020675926,0.0007757083,0.0007297773,0.0051108142,0.0009545489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95695233,0.039381318,0.0012174976,0.00034828336,0.0015657746,0.00053465646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018440606,0.00049633486,0.00074459106,0.0047448347,0.009567765,0.021821838,0.0014812724,0.006831389,0.002624848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0361063,0.00049106305,0.00029582452,0.005045256,0.043543506,0.016327716,0.00390707,0.01006023,0.0006496592],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009146748,0.000012056655,0.0001736704,0.0001617277,0.000004676498,0.00007491007,0.010196363,0.000117980984,0.00010391014,0.9555651,0.010896956,0.022683447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016428678,0.000029088758,0.0015025537,0.0018780355,0.000013146828,0.00019273224,0.012151347,0.0003842326,0.00026503947,0.5990742,0.3844383,0.000054864035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060116653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011089947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021821838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007832602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063703065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.097524405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008761701","doi":"","title":"Constitution and by-laws.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Subject (documents); Legislation; Government (linguistics); Product (mathematics)","score_opus":0.007223933297404581,"score_gpt":0.19283547085095587,"score_spread":0.18561153755355128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008761701","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020009896,0.0044856113,0.0011708299,0.028059868,0.0011609731,0.00006287807,0.00073549745,0.00010291779,0.96222043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08425778,0.0016450589,0.0008511118,0.010788401,0.00024221062,0.00008998525,0.00038364148,0.00008166976,0.9016601],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996828,0.0005677634,0.00008740461,0.00037276951,0.0012882594,0.00085572555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99765766,0.00042081892,0.00009348949,0.00034485204,0.0012342327,0.00024892142],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024030611,0.00042755928,0.00044596748,0.0006771697,0.009370039,0.0073834285,0.00089461694,0.0045152484,0.04625827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062905727,0.00027812057,0.00026207787,0.0010081481,0.006681363,0.0021389255,0.0014553173,0.0049412455,0.0074650897],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009741219,0.000009467517,0.00027579465,0.000029431789,0.0000031544894,0.000044224846,0.00083006884,0.000052361665,0.00014458278,0.745939,0.24132851,0.011333648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045921283,0.000004128285,0.0011945828,0.000069894,0.0000038054545,0.000022033766,0.00045563205,0.00005982132,0.00009188594,0.017798834,0.9802855,0.000009385754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7444354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8587041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9537417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019268723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035646673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5141393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008817017","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Cases 2024 (Pt 6) | Courts, Politics and Public Trust","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Politics; Constitutional law; Democracy; Constitutional economics; Public trust; Constitutional interpretation; Supreme court","score_opus":0.03146506673502819,"score_gpt":0.29301211637987995,"score_spread":0.26154704964485176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008817017","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017408349,0.0038992125,0.0012121837,0.05967652,0.0011566108,0.000074248375,0.00061149214,0.000061664054,0.9158997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65754926,0.00214308,0.0014490715,0.022486314,0.0015846527,0.00014265275,0.00056885,0.00006747615,0.31400865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945511,0.0017638137,0.00022015764,0.0004866396,0.0017136341,0.0012646155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951277,0.002714379,0.00030594843,0.0004374886,0.0007788623,0.0006355276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049662893,0.00018421547,0.00022925017,0.0010944527,0.00918692,0.009801219,0.0011866693,0.0054525477,0.033048075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013723423,0.0003373184,0.0003901238,0.0015257675,0.009897274,0.003702226,0.0038786225,0.004611034,0.0029516094],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064972005,0.00001659256,0.0004379262,0.000021294076,0.0000019772453,0.00013264411,0.0010931948,0.000068451336,0.000108529115,0.91819996,0.07374352,0.006169307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023818839,0.000020840427,0.0037334627,0.00019929525,0.0000056833464,0.00015036021,0.0034947598,0.00023075148,0.00040038128,0.13875793,0.8529539,0.000028760476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05985983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08784312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05985983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0088092685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008036016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.119022846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008857197","doi":"","title":"DELEGITIMATION BY CONSTITION? LIBERAL DEMOCRATIC EXPERIMENTALISM AND THE QUESTION OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC RIGHTS","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Experimentalism; Legitimation; Politics; Liberal democracy; Liberalism; Democracy; Constitutional theory; Classical liberalism; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.016428674201910267,"score_gpt":0.2696878300518581,"score_spread":0.25325915584994785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008857197","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033912137,0.004502217,0.034270287,0.42368627,0.0018105431,0.00007955574,0.00011469505,0.0001819518,0.5014424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94219404,0.0011124056,0.0037315201,0.024221078,0.0011652147,0.00022922807,0.00002600606,0.000103071405,0.027217504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9830563,0.010026875,0.00029784435,0.002868383,0.0019184035,0.0018321953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879281,0.006826256,0.00087450596,0.0030460535,0.00071639346,0.00060867757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022800723,0.00035993868,0.00066249724,0.0008330144,0.0058711856,0.012279589,0.0017906409,0.0068064486,0.009163953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026045779,0.00036241434,0.00077598717,0.00081134273,0.05174582,0.017491551,0.008356027,0.010125421,0.0012237238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000535666,0.0000067343385,0.000036089947,0.0000054199986,0.0000012635045,0.000004695505,0.00037530798,0.000037579364,0.000029406863,0.9974921,0.0010686009,0.000937499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020177116,0.00001277829,0.000095053554,0.00002505669,0.000002243865,0.000010212216,0.0002873946,0.0001896082,0.00019818063,0.9633854,0.03576632,0.0000075537573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002983426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027691019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022800723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006248953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005992684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.120583236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7010623906","doi":"","title":"Judicial Discipline through the Prism of Public Law Values: A Contextual Analysis of Bill C-9, An Act to Reform the Judges Act","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Legislation; Legislature; Context (archaeology); Prism; Democracy; Law reform; Reform Act; Judicial review; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.04632063985858552,"score_gpt":0.3338341876767242,"score_spread":0.28751354781813865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7010623906","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3311739,0.0076680933,0.007120605,0.09707711,0.00040542547,0.00016504903,0.00026844218,0.000039681112,0.5560818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933543,0.0010477668,0.0007122377,0.0018382487,0.000083252155,0.00003483803,0.000035846348,0.000021358706,0.0028722582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932191,0.004609005,0.00009926772,0.00037377758,0.0006573522,0.0010416008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955917,0.0030621267,0.0003639094,0.00019974317,0.0004844628,0.0002980732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035297256,0.00028477033,0.0003340419,0.002407583,0.018750833,0.012010863,0.001228026,0.0029998631,0.0022038512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075117545,0.0002911504,0.00036206574,0.0030367435,0.036635507,0.005601685,0.0040048063,0.0051596845,0.00014601342],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013084083,0.000020188367,0.0010838954,0.000047184232,0.00000382296,0.00028668606,0.09604193,0.00022864496,0.0001325884,0.89566946,0.0033617194,0.003110869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025958003,0.00004506544,0.013204144,0.0006654073,0.000044377768,0.00021103516,0.47704032,0.0008026742,0.0006022431,0.23453374,0.27276978,0.00005521502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14820407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2754362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8517959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032758392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020654412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29468286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7010871894","doi":"","title":"Judgment and Opportunity: Decision Assignment on the\\nMcLachlin Court","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Workload; Supreme court; Measure (data warehouse); Simple (philosophy)","score_opus":0.07315507619552493,"score_gpt":0.30719945078421257,"score_spread":0.23404437458868765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7010871894","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76560354,0.00028591452,0.0042682,0.004905837,0.00006134964,0.00017662217,0.0001436039,0.00004227342,0.22451267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937862,0.00003980715,0.00067087077,0.00009431499,0.00002164145,0.000015283793,0.000020733929,0.000008482757,0.0053425566],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99204576,0.002580581,0.00017016541,0.0005979084,0.0024673077,0.0021382365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899624,0.00413165,0.00075781636,0.00028146963,0.0014068382,0.0034599176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004060687,0.0001780148,0.0003059323,0.0018081167,0.0076513677,0.0075193266,0.0008220334,0.0008259888,0.014129904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024251677,0.00024273265,0.00017127782,0.0014216095,0.004652941,0.0024351615,0.004714119,0.0013986609,0.00085978495],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010359553,0.00048723412,0.14531854,0.00007782449,0.000044362685,0.0021125686,0.027662385,0.0058604223,0.0028742924,0.3673793,0.025728835,0.42141822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018529093,0.00061310007,0.4895079,0.00022088237,0.000062202096,0.0006293922,0.0630574,0.025805013,0.0027010962,0.3053376,0.11169112,0.000189041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09270897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25111297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90729105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012809691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012497901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18433869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7011466903","doi":"","title":"The Migration of Constitutional Ideas","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Variety (cybernetics); Jurisprudence; Constitutional law; Politics; Comparative politics; Constitutional economics; Constitutional theory","score_opus":0.01634818721657076,"score_gpt":0.2762287723849715,"score_spread":0.25988058516840074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7011466903","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045159847,0.022191292,0.0439205,0.08091446,0.00297242,0.000106960535,0.0001289349,0.00011865179,0.80448693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93024045,0.008453262,0.011529957,0.008233664,0.0014476468,0.00025437187,0.00008195847,0.00013865656,0.03962004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9776869,0.013316087,0.0006050888,0.00242376,0.0045725685,0.0013956031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98943335,0.0066313976,0.0006171432,0.002194723,0.0006648739,0.0004585353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0135188075,0.0004267325,0.0006362655,0.0027389836,0.008288646,0.015170507,0.0018976993,0.0031374297,0.0053489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019182501,0.00048832776,0.00044631664,0.0036222448,0.07652447,0.020928362,0.01083342,0.009194146,0.00057213334],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016879508,0.000002271646,0.00003797395,0.000010560918,0.0000011948925,0.00001037288,0.0039467127,0.000030228102,0.000019312858,0.9923228,0.00070731173,0.0029096333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008415547,0.000019004596,0.00033485322,0.00014768374,0.0000032723376,0.00007558133,0.009321228,0.00019630852,0.00009105605,0.79875886,0.19103532,0.000008366725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035204412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025476376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015170507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010973023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007877773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.079615235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7013777544","doi":"","title":"Friendly Precedent","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Politics; Construct (python library); Political question; Test (biology); Supreme Court Decisions","score_opus":0.025549263475433688,"score_gpt":0.30355003125824015,"score_spread":0.27800076778280647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7013777544","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3271475,0.006460291,0.027997762,0.010433229,0.0009931976,0.0003123191,0.002880726,0.00020971874,0.6235652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9592867,0.0011875293,0.0061456547,0.002372866,0.000479311,0.00008906902,0.00095393916,0.000066397595,0.029418658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916944,0.0022708192,0.0005103655,0.001283341,0.0030065714,0.0012345819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9727675,0.013948381,0.0057556643,0.0019154046,0.0036952905,0.0019176784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053960946,0.00022416275,0.00040850317,0.004358335,0.0052008447,0.0032972423,0.00080505,0.0014672846,0.024876824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042002294,0.0002958984,0.00032416225,0.0052433964,0.0022898417,0.0038485643,0.0021250166,0.0020389878,0.003519015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021394102,0.00018176412,0.101329066,0.0006013666,0.000081490434,0.002512677,0.01665952,0.0019990383,0.0023509993,0.65683746,0.055942778,0.16128992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006772202,0.00025919118,0.14108738,0.001021629,0.000074078795,0.0018239223,0.011186472,0.0021523144,0.0019531322,0.18375939,0.6564897,0.00012511585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009105329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02773769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024876824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002355596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08322132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7014594068","doi":"","title":"Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Constitutionalism; Commonwealth; Adjudication; Underpinning; Human rights; Dominance (genetics); Treaty; Politics","score_opus":0.039657105448221444,"score_gpt":0.30975065739938334,"score_spread":0.2700935519511619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7014594068","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04716041,0.00499419,0.04223854,0.022668032,0.00028591353,0.000054793923,0.000061647544,0.00011500155,0.88242155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.973869,0.0013728507,0.005421066,0.0038017149,0.00037246893,0.00009682642,0.0000457764,0.000069449685,0.014950831],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913818,0.004295605,0.0002460052,0.0019750267,0.001229801,0.00087164034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962763,0.0019023024,0.0003566972,0.00083151297,0.00044094303,0.00019216238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008364491,0.00035217564,0.0006468641,0.0016026678,0.005142328,0.0078476425,0.00084854395,0.0025472546,0.0074681435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0086268205,0.00024366901,0.00052891904,0.0017879077,0.030836327,0.007978954,0.006921046,0.005487596,0.0005008538],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002337882,0.0000021135893,0.00008370589,0.000008759198,0.000002525393,0.000011705709,0.00054412626,0.00017033744,0.00004344382,0.9956138,0.00042949148,0.003087475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000926131,0.000007210171,0.00033631964,0.00003995264,0.0000062246495,0.000026617166,0.0003852838,0.00023273974,0.00013317002,0.97163534,0.027182264,0.0000056951812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017973738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017869031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008364491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043432745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024500974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044236124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7018870012","doi":"","title":"5e Colloque Libre De L'Adte 2018 - Guy Rouleau","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"other","venue":"Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Portrait; Exhibition; Alchemy; Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.008868749959124561,"score_gpt":0.2064625915158206,"score_spread":0.19759384155669604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7018870012","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026774083,0.006345919,0.00074885023,0.0116837425,0.015948862,0.00011959867,0.016252618,0.0013897864,0.9472429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001645299,0.0016375043,0.00030041818,0.0008549601,0.0011543387,0.00006927723,0.002420469,0.00063880393,0.99127907],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756515,0.00028167965,0.00013022518,0.00025446518,0.0014269835,0.00034150347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99328434,0.0011364565,0.00034503968,0.00073788397,0.0033053614,0.0011909225],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018232863,0.0008159073,0.0010501597,0.0035140105,0.0029525778,0.009749276,0.0012977084,0.0028432196,0.78940135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011077277,0.00050480897,0.00044812824,0.0037285164,0.0009818021,0.0035043994,0.003718759,0.002880544,0.559714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005337763,0.0000031552509,0.000018793084,0.00004197383,6.351849e-7,0.000010172304,0.00002204869,0.000010567764,0.00001777621,0.0016607472,0.9912498,0.0069589983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011928909,7.7898756e-7,0.00005947151,0.000033392098,3.1773598e-7,0.000007896338,0.000017346623,0.0000051650645,0.000015839425,0.00014783123,0.99970895,0.0000016888846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04160051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07745269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78940135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00585249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067717135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3003934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7018984516","doi":"","title":"A first for this top legal mind: practising law; Former Supreme Court justice shares advice as she begins the next phase of her high-profile career back in Montreal","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Advice (programming); Economic Justice; Legal advice; Phase (matter)","score_opus":0.050741519832428805,"score_gpt":0.3244725207231976,"score_spread":0.2737310008907688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7018984516","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020583548,0.0021708622,0.003461764,0.73628396,0.00921341,0.00014944689,0.00016949966,0.0005590377,0.22740845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17919026,0.0017642704,0.008171203,0.13610518,0.0009827277,0.000083563405,0.00009930993,0.00049837405,0.6731051],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994284,0.0012596914,0.000071144364,0.00037996913,0.0014742378,0.0025309771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9709929,0.0012976967,0.0004554514,0.00022505748,0.0028884301,0.024140354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037732995,0.0004701239,0.0004301926,0.0010849,0.05211805,0.013371778,0.0027113056,0.0072626094,0.058026705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013353402,0.0008056885,0.00041767815,0.0007210864,0.010690988,0.0047065564,0.0067728683,0.01589065,0.010495597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000147309875,0.0002013563,0.003078038,0.000031885727,0.000007103739,0.0009452671,0.029538507,0.000060861978,0.00086303893,0.019023543,0.9174658,0.028769784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013497245,0.000060915547,0.0060860827,0.00013516187,0.000006625137,0.0005813448,0.09581287,0.00014999871,0.00053415896,0.005217698,0.89133,0.00007159824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.52583903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8894077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52583903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021425541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.080613516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9539068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7018994993","doi":"","title":"Equality Rights, Ratio Identification, and the Un/Predictable Judicial Path Not Taken: Quebec (Attorney General) V A and R V Ibanescu","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Path (computing); Stability (learning theory); Field (mathematics); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.028824572275926108,"score_gpt":0.27302654325878734,"score_spread":0.24420197098286123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7018994993","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15270236,0.00804186,0.006708235,0.3436864,0.0009815705,0.00022562579,0.0007506453,0.000053903696,0.4868494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94101924,0.0011319557,0.0011943321,0.019017419,0.00028934443,0.0000754228,0.000053007236,0.00004151624,0.037177783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936486,0.0022528733,0.00012882233,0.00072859804,0.0010688816,0.0021720969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99283785,0.003201301,0.0005097385,0.00044433624,0.002326889,0.00067993294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011745137,0.00047552647,0.0006993195,0.0015209385,0.017481746,0.009186339,0.0024183022,0.0082502635,0.011345888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0174122,0.0004019582,0.0005426632,0.0020795036,0.019910729,0.005553247,0.002290624,0.008642279,0.00042325506],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037276735,0.000034943492,0.0022541794,0.000016516373,0.000010278199,0.00006763045,0.0011527363,0.00021513316,0.00004881255,0.97286123,0.018225027,0.0050763055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002757864,0.00011889276,0.03534985,0.00059703353,0.00021445318,0.00019318199,0.015829952,0.006168275,0.002117346,0.7573721,0.1815188,0.0002443013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90633565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94737804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09366435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041149784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07241132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29856396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7019938318","doi":"","title":"Janis Clements to Moderate Panel at Eastern District of Texas Bar Association's Bench Bar Conference","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bar (unit); Work (physics); Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.06206665032101703,"score_gpt":0.3001623180897081,"score_spread":0.23809566776869107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7019938318","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005979329,0.003441004,0.0006260134,0.3449103,0.043762073,0.0008491495,0.0020744866,0.00039447317,0.5979632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0049599293,0.00051002123,0.00020828501,0.070011206,0.0031346614,0.000338754,0.00018575495,0.00007786874,0.9205735],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970385,0.0003532014,0.0001010876,0.0005296627,0.00085606537,0.0011214446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99535155,0.001405645,0.000102774175,0.0001834627,0.0014791939,0.0014773704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003805955,0.0012384399,0.0014003229,0.0018854341,0.031373512,0.014781212,0.0030047013,0.029783892,0.1788075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075034257,0.0013264499,0.0011842387,0.0010177977,0.0023249967,0.00333253,0.0052682064,0.020074226,0.061106198],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018937191,0.000078387144,0.00017601032,0.000020870282,0.0000030944911,0.00010955413,0.00012589512,0.000031225667,0.00010972529,0.0040173624,0.9922665,0.0030424711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004138135,0.000033026085,0.002570113,0.00013137491,0.000013042609,0.000029953733,0.0011972373,0.00016672138,0.00020787888,0.0015018188,0.99406564,0.000041867184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08558683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32231542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1788075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007088577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023087628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59817064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7021112684","doi":"","title":"NEW COMMONWEALTH MODEL OF CONSTITUTIONALISM: CANADA E REGNO UNITO","year":2015,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Electronic Theses and Dissertations Repository (University of Pisa)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Government (linguistics); Carry (investment); High Court","score_opus":0.026537863622610163,"score_gpt":0.2385939901276755,"score_spread":0.21205612650506533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7021112684","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025835067,0.00073230686,0.005326901,0.018386444,0.0001287152,0.00006736708,0.0002041234,0.000058820504,0.94926035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9050224,0.0007180351,0.002920971,0.0022882263,0.00011431925,0.000090419395,0.00008183106,0.00008384307,0.08867995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950237,0.0010341359,0.00007667359,0.0007587881,0.0015891616,0.0015175192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952004,0.00111513,0.00022462371,0.0008100015,0.0017388874,0.00091103016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003185144,0.00040602853,0.0009073257,0.0024537782,0.01424356,0.013806573,0.0021262465,0.004098882,0.0196055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011027775,0.00038994907,0.00074472406,0.0037495578,0.01641547,0.00548256,0.0035559342,0.0050787623,0.0010409872],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002980241,0.0000036428073,0.0001311945,0.0000031489094,0.0000014555277,0.000008359975,0.00028127534,0.00014888089,0.000007445862,0.9959235,0.0023160758,0.0011721317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000392524,0.000010498474,0.0019932564,0.0000967824,0.000025816726,0.00004669035,0.0021755917,0.002928764,0.00005665649,0.88207495,0.11051002,0.000041768268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8828549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91499394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11714512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054071866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06218279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3923207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7022573929","doi":"","title":"Foreword","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital USD (University of San Diego)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International law; State (computer science); Deportation; International relations","score_opus":0.027417182222262953,"score_gpt":0.23091320885470026,"score_spread":0.20349602663243732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7022573929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00050312816,0.009708673,0.0013570127,0.057586707,0.25409397,0.00026989414,0.0030361149,0.00091135583,0.6725332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031530913,0.0053811264,0.0005858538,0.020920146,0.045663238,0.00014059694,0.0024429557,0.0005996063,0.9211135],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900705,0.00012043969,0.00007547907,0.00014763743,0.0005537036,0.0000957839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99522334,0.00081866264,0.00019728941,0.00026832178,0.002836682,0.0006557032],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008200809,0.0007870739,0.0008064808,0.002268618,0.0021900088,0.0050414633,0.001232958,0.0024642574,0.503529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076168985,0.0003054319,0.00051660975,0.0016421261,0.00066649046,0.0031350637,0.0016613955,0.003473583,0.5013915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000076146243,0.000005885955,0.000024103318,0.000045544708,6.5494237e-7,0.000014399366,0.00001735991,0.0000072936673,0.000038899092,0.0012192389,0.98346287,0.015156081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022828071,0.0000068294908,0.000088004344,0.00008480044,9.210883e-7,0.000034505356,0.000047289293,0.000009237454,0.00003350014,0.00068914104,0.9990011,0.0000024218316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022197424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031637782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.496471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014466316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020589915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7023552178","doi":"","title":"Ontario lawyers’ groups monitoring judge selection process as new law looms, leaders say","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Selection (genetic algorithm); Work (physics); Jury selection; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.034587756071874066,"score_gpt":0.29715087888454533,"score_spread":0.26256312281267125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7023552178","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8745349,0.0001636631,0.0011858182,0.008396475,0.00014454298,0.00042309926,0.0010392624,0.00010065257,0.1140117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9363071,0.00007339953,0.0013193879,0.00083041715,0.00004268311,0.00011898636,0.00050154625,0.000022248614,0.060784325],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964798,0.00071245007,0.00012473745,0.0004915477,0.0014411547,0.0007502791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9710361,0.0058412203,0.0039524185,0.0012430835,0.012489437,0.0054378053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055860244,0.00016130353,0.0002602162,0.0024909629,0.0078020273,0.003797853,0.0010334861,0.0012631689,0.01465853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029930161,0.0003594651,0.00017839798,0.0023102665,0.0018196885,0.0012589481,0.0016486642,0.0012177565,0.0016001253],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012779643,0.00059082924,0.6650444,0.000092421586,0.00007809883,0.0002541263,0.075194374,0.001158387,0.0041389624,0.0136026405,0.12159515,0.11697273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013238747,0.00020882682,0.8166073,0.000045235767,0.000051035346,0.000025979765,0.07078815,0.0030776712,0.0019581588,0.0022694839,0.104751244,0.00008462477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8981715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98036504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.101828516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028647786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03987593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20785522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7023726369","doi":"","title":"On Pardons and Miscarriages of Justice: Extracting and Dissecting Institutional Bias from the Conviction Review Framework in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Government (linguistics); Perspective (graphical); Subject (documents); Identification (biology)","score_opus":0.03381408080215897,"score_gpt":0.29280167791268613,"score_spread":0.25898759711052716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7023726369","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80383605,0.0061303903,0.009439283,0.051794317,0.000258135,0.0004896683,0.0012643781,0.00005094083,0.12673678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99354786,0.0005436184,0.000881089,0.0016280728,0.000046091944,0.00004987783,0.00007400282,0.000017584955,0.0032118608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9519712,0.018511463,0.0023880475,0.0041736937,0.013192548,0.00976319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7252003,0.18250248,0.02423267,0.010904707,0.048188068,0.008971696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06562419,0.00030255658,0.0013101458,0.006198128,0.020366034,0.011026636,0.0052222013,0.0041813646,0.004990524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28639215,0.00059783657,0.0007897512,0.010036958,0.01782524,0.0046735015,0.0053451466,0.005918897,0.00020837047],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034935673,0.0001548968,0.2848894,0.0003774323,0.00036897205,0.00079283223,0.056161776,0.0040788297,0.00019118667,0.5781088,0.022376824,0.052149728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028136204,0.00018054817,0.5303078,0.0021834075,0.0019895628,0.00036282558,0.13711749,0.02095619,0.0021160615,0.18987416,0.11418342,0.00044707078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98066413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9916313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08858213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08858213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20810519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64271134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7024184881","doi":"","title":"Refining the Reasonable Apprehension of Bias Test:\\nProviding Judges Better Tools for Addressing Judicial\\nDisqualification","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Apprehension; Test (biology); Jurisprudence; Order (exchange); Empirical research","score_opus":0.11125272735678109,"score_gpt":0.320596949783814,"score_spread":0.20934422242703288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7024184881","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29483175,0.0021124817,0.36199656,0.10698704,0.0018029355,0.0019716267,0.0006185654,0.0008199167,0.22885914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9055961,0.00031692313,0.0838518,0.0060024355,0.00025953737,0.00032382424,0.000093861876,0.000060069186,0.0034955295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9326229,0.028874421,0.0046537733,0.0047291517,0.026245901,0.0028739641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7931118,0.14304145,0.014001123,0.013520509,0.03291557,0.0034096478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.061771274,0.00042749083,0.001166313,0.004822297,0.004419832,0.008512161,0.005550783,0.006239937,0.0043256287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25284034,0.00042162373,0.0012240503,0.0031305412,0.023218047,0.011360081,0.006481458,0.0064029414,0.000589199],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016763764,0.00018278502,0.02268537,0.00020466832,0.000041091364,0.00024631622,0.006539699,0.0014095505,0.0006839306,0.88268363,0.008933229,0.076222025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003480128,0.0005979016,0.03275115,0.0007153563,0.00027523265,0.0005597942,0.009371136,0.04284036,0.005999621,0.83990085,0.066258796,0.0003817949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028164648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03848091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061771274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077193556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02376005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3266816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7026451660","doi":"","title":"Access to Justice: Report on Selected Reform Initiatives in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Economic Justice; Point (geometry); Happening; Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.03753489004126905,"score_gpt":0.30977844806912413,"score_spread":0.2722435580278551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7026451660","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57530695,0.04312653,0.0012073044,0.10947461,0.0013273767,0.0055442736,0.04391486,0.00044347672,0.21965466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8475369,0.03062909,0.0033008608,0.019539816,0.0003769926,0.0010836485,0.016730255,0.00011600595,0.080686346],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98732984,0.0006493912,0.00040654725,0.00036279124,0.0064885668,0.004762886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854908,0.0007826112,0.0007096182,0.00023416619,0.0073002893,0.0054825083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045347903,0.00055332185,0.00069547934,0.005452783,0.011745824,0.0078780595,0.0024413536,0.0031435515,0.0051633255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009767134,0.0006229541,0.0007595746,0.011138146,0.0021227833,0.0013304726,0.0038803583,0.002815028,0.00042840053],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009196189,0.002012044,0.27751812,0.004774559,0.00058368326,0.002897506,0.019299481,0.0052299853,0.004734384,0.04236133,0.40293226,0.23673698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001900725,0.00026677898,0.62308687,0.00053573825,0.00025188513,0.00018239756,0.01815106,0.0008202206,0.001946735,0.000598155,0.3538218,0.00014826795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9956447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14584549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14584549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.40729466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99069816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7026625615","doi":"","title":"Alle piler peker opp En vekstkurveanalyse av kvinner i de høyeste domstolene","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Bergen Open Research Archive (BORA) (University of Bergen)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Università degli Studi di Trento; York University; University of Cincinnati","keywords":"Representation (politics); Legislature; Selection (genetic algorithm); Scope (computer science); Sample (material); Social representation","score_opus":0.06724094224199764,"score_gpt":0.37366134754857605,"score_spread":0.30642040530657844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7026625615","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79409844,0.01624263,0.012691537,0.017412804,0.0007137883,0.00013271479,0.019790037,0.00016469216,0.13875349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93772435,0.009748037,0.0053072646,0.0009073323,0.00024387214,0.00010155454,0.006272962,0.0002034112,0.039491206],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962793,0.0007597757,0.00030377248,0.00066523143,0.0014708326,0.0005210773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99322915,0.0036160133,0.001256259,0.00045291104,0.0010316572,0.00041399087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037399903,0.000323006,0.00066931924,0.0021013282,0.0010334975,0.0055776634,0.00050786015,0.0006922477,0.020880071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012273732,0.00025441364,0.0006230162,0.0036295904,0.0014286505,0.002789653,0.0023578173,0.0016986803,0.0035391203],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027956374,0.0004594459,0.2762978,0.0018913498,0.00049012725,0.0010910721,0.049558505,0.0048129205,0.0025253168,0.1198783,0.07461131,0.46810424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020213882,0.00019569631,0.35543054,0.0027217749,0.00012691157,0.00048510212,0.044468526,0.0015431319,0.0037660329,0.01875769,0.5723655,0.00011885083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015318189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01578248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020880071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024581756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003170176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0698508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7026908478","doi":"","title":"Barnett explains Chevron deference and significance of the U.S. Supreme Court’s hearing of Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimando","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Chevron (anatomy); Judicial deference; Supreme court; Doctrine; Agency (philosophy); Administrative law; Adjudication","score_opus":0.032725981591642916,"score_gpt":0.2719203164874002,"score_spread":0.2391943348957573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7026908478","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12833844,0.03441029,0.011446815,0.41459048,0.008626446,0.00019641538,0.004220371,0.0002928538,0.39787784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7376305,0.013424238,0.0031061661,0.13803835,0.003882182,0.00016420589,0.0018928474,0.0001858595,0.10167564],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929502,0.0013822514,0.0004855911,0.0010214079,0.0026348648,0.0015257559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97667056,0.01646149,0.0016050406,0.0007780912,0.0035460729,0.000938734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007897232,0.0005194269,0.00046963568,0.0038041798,0.0089238705,0.006007119,0.0013554347,0.008826594,0.0069201845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029812515,0.0006536943,0.0005880015,0.003493896,0.0051187654,0.0051040635,0.0032376752,0.008522581,0.0014088121],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005679995,0.00009715097,0.026465712,0.00012900532,0.00003206496,0.0012669867,0.01049178,0.00035259148,0.00027876475,0.4291773,0.48402712,0.047624804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023122973,0.00005305931,0.0367569,0.0007810948,0.000041066603,0.0004199457,0.005806863,0.0006264146,0.00083853235,0.073036335,0.8814798,0.00013682588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1104473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21157676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1104473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046572136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004788886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21960884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7027026214","doi":"","title":"But Why Him? A Review of The Tenth Justice: Judicial Appointments, Marc Nadon, and the Supreme Court Act Reference, by Carissima Mathen and Michael Plaxton","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Economic Justice; Judicial review; Supreme Court Decisions; Focus (optics); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.02064910314676555,"score_gpt":0.27250422319724954,"score_spread":0.251855120050484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7027026214","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005260217,0.92396235,0.000121962534,0.052157238,0.007163592,0.0000043803816,0.000023540157,0.000005004357,0.016035948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018615626,0.93238324,0.0003256735,0.017607767,0.00964075,0.00001750346,0.0000719558,0.000021740696,0.021315824],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979711,0.00071829924,0.000114037306,0.0001989303,0.0007924432,0.00020505252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965237,0.001864545,0.00025232622,0.00006538041,0.0010149331,0.00027904514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002363306,0.00043289573,0.0006719637,0.0028175868,0.004408489,0.0065684887,0.0012830268,0.002653274,0.0028227565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007326561,0.00039623925,0.00027381408,0.0047194376,0.0067013553,0.0040450143,0.0012339642,0.00466346,0.0011575988],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016323746,0.000022449283,0.00060181675,0.0008571146,0.000008214375,0.00015794042,0.0033239492,0.00011689984,0.00006637771,0.13448046,0.7783304,0.08201812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019463248,0.0000051028956,0.0012814982,0.0017871702,0.000003927794,0.00010526114,0.0018975169,0.00002409804,0.000019277366,0.006187048,0.98867863,0.000008577405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.104156956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23294199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.895843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0114671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01931298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2071014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7027707413","doi":"","title":"Courts in Federal Countries","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OAPEN (The OAPEN Foundation)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Federalism; Judicial review; Comparability; Judicial independence; Federal court; Constitutional court","score_opus":0.029300458694038342,"score_gpt":0.32696952767433063,"score_spread":0.2976690689802923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7027707413","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039661627,0.007062819,0.0015811042,0.010452649,0.00025604508,0.000031609343,0.00019504201,0.00004974579,0.9407094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9238801,0.0062453584,0.001335894,0.003529639,0.00027142587,0.000039797094,0.00018106692,0.000025130033,0.06449161],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99606115,0.0018278429,0.00016633891,0.00039735052,0.00064639765,0.0009008935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99630046,0.0017438228,0.00055033964,0.00039710687,0.00066338637,0.000344809],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002140473,0.000119944285,0.00019696179,0.0017022801,0.0064614355,0.008249917,0.00051731535,0.0020493085,0.016277796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073388233,0.00017156861,0.00016128784,0.0034280024,0.005499658,0.003568503,0.0023247234,0.0020237311,0.0011313247],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003050306,0.000010121644,0.0008468831,0.000027992584,0.0000020539223,0.000062387415,0.0038669938,0.00012002953,0.00005271283,0.96729887,0.015207654,0.012501211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009053946,0.000020473926,0.01059794,0.0004947051,0.00001119901,0.00022274282,0.007982012,0.00031559216,0.00027242338,0.17926942,0.80078524,0.000019274934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019673444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027296621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019673444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060830233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006148305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054454625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029675742","doi":"","title":"Judicial Review of Executive Policymaking in Advanced Democracies: Beyond Rights Review","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Deference; Rulemaking; Judicial deference; Legitimacy; Duty; Democracy; Separation of powers","score_opus":0.022804690602122302,"score_gpt":0.3464578828755558,"score_spread":0.3236531922734335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029675742","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.105077386,0.2629038,0.060230494,0.23698398,0.0039883354,0.00057335594,0.00017895839,0.00022020857,0.32984343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9258479,0.031317793,0.010641524,0.018705295,0.003333516,0.00018146174,0.00006199082,0.000056892055,0.009853531],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.90588456,0.064106,0.0056544417,0.0041304915,0.01615006,0.004074362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.62980556,0.3016002,0.016694495,0.013491491,0.036219876,0.0021884197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09130623,0.00020851515,0.0010451309,0.0066483016,0.004278706,0.013340749,0.0019227985,0.006463049,0.0015033567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20619707,0.0004426556,0.00066259387,0.0041917055,0.017023088,0.008517873,0.0026519028,0.0062299715,0.0002774751],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028138991,0.000042766216,0.0021718778,0.0009759722,0.000053860047,0.00037803233,0.0062918323,0.0012607815,0.00047451496,0.8931542,0.011173187,0.08399473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009464279,0.00016496176,0.009159343,0.005835816,0.00016398753,0.0005634419,0.0049932664,0.003029927,0.0029601154,0.47524548,0.4976583,0.00013074711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009058033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013694643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09130623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009683299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022033425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48287928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029830175","doi":"","title":"L'impact des réformes de la procédure civile et de la déontologie sur le rôle des avocats privatistes québécois : une étude qualitative","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Qualitative research; Vulnerability (computing); Process (computing)","score_opus":0.08224822089695759,"score_gpt":0.44808879786137,"score_spread":0.3658405769644124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029830175","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9470965,0.0015610788,0.00034384368,0.015287474,0.000052737883,0.00007454631,0.00015991589,0.000006787179,0.035417184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99235195,0.00037371795,0.00014791949,0.00096531824,0.000008712262,0.000056239292,0.000021548394,0.000005156161,0.0060693277],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910711,0.0048135216,0.000112675945,0.0004821897,0.0011259404,0.0023946231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9752896,0.01805038,0.0017026642,0.00054733624,0.002387983,0.0020221025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009357729,0.00025117432,0.00052171433,0.001005414,0.012649826,0.006916951,0.001497806,0.0029533543,0.0077101383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020070504,0.00031579766,0.00033669526,0.002230526,0.018868646,0.0032738987,0.003133726,0.0038759396,0.00016911364],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035843483,0.0005804624,0.044499397,0.00041945858,0.00006736153,0.000621454,0.6502806,0.0011178909,0.0021667853,0.25082552,0.009510172,0.039552495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015009592,0.00024419845,0.20260899,0.0007310021,0.00010801934,0.000098313525,0.66893035,0.0007888989,0.00092069485,0.009484473,0.11584826,0.000086714565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91026825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9488781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08973175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08417902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.105860285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6107644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7042811484","doi":"","title":"The right to vote limited by criminal convictions : a quest for balance between functional right and individual right","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"theses.fr (ABES)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Balance (ability); Jurisprudence; Context (archaeology); ESPACE","score_opus":0.07328796293285507,"score_gpt":0.30185314961422405,"score_spread":0.228565186681369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7042811484","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1633658,0.002278276,0.01939794,0.031118358,0.00024568848,0.000047211473,0.00025306502,0.000049863924,0.78324383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9709962,0.00041066651,0.0012866374,0.0014666287,0.00018824235,0.00004173144,0.000052752224,0.00003661306,0.025520634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935295,0.0025550572,0.00021715829,0.001331082,0.0009561181,0.0014110485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931658,0.0028822902,0.0009696299,0.0012781483,0.00084006076,0.0008641454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053624264,0.00023370715,0.0005107786,0.0017433523,0.0032292858,0.0061153746,0.001156825,0.002678293,0.022688929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0149569735,0.00022294355,0.0005271389,0.0011118699,0.017006366,0.0050228797,0.0039738663,0.0034501217,0.0017126015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003449939,0.00001470467,0.0025740028,0.000021654967,0.0000075039957,0.00005257986,0.0012795125,0.00022317871,0.00016005144,0.98379135,0.0012181367,0.010622878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046185978,0.00008028311,0.01571491,0.0002488323,0.000026642081,0.00024970452,0.0035134982,0.0009626825,0.00057352916,0.895331,0.08320968,0.000042979344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065846764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01231584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022688929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002553277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035966549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075902045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043462720","doi":"","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada: History of the Institution","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Liquation; Emperipolesis; Diafiltration; Triacetin; Demotion","score_opus":0.029384307716705423,"score_gpt":0.22230952609279914,"score_spread":0.19292521837609372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043462720","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.075249776,0.054735184,0.001765982,0.16807729,0.0014995745,0.00009124749,0.00095511385,0.00009614659,0.6975297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87674075,0.012767332,0.0008939428,0.01404394,0.00048326436,0.00004004177,0.00015805007,0.00010784217,0.09476482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943124,0.00078108645,0.00010013999,0.0006192142,0.0017885907,0.0023985184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992818,0.0017276839,0.00029275115,0.000212411,0.0034504351,0.0014986327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027783222,0.00045740878,0.0006695655,0.0041583185,0.03491298,0.018766979,0.00269208,0.0076330625,0.015642628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014742585,0.0007105593,0.00037476793,0.008086571,0.031966027,0.0043406524,0.003088683,0.008476462,0.00066112005],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026093348,0.000018515524,0.0012200666,0.00006053806,0.000012659503,0.00014542296,0.006845664,0.00029901954,0.00007534213,0.9350808,0.043547317,0.01266858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003627651,0.00001887371,0.012828892,0.00073002634,0.000048017246,0.00012611948,0.014307119,0.0007130255,0.000324226,0.10740508,0.8633426,0.00011975604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9941508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77498734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22501269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3120139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8988754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7045230023","doi":"","title":"Alla ricerca dell'invisibilita perduta: le \"sentenze senza autore\" nelle Corti supreme di Stati Uniti e Canada.","year":2019,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Supreme court; First amendment; Constitutional right","score_opus":0.020276548045611877,"score_gpt":0.23237961238708973,"score_spread":0.21210306434147785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7045230023","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03246067,0.004643323,0.009171685,0.093013756,0.00091247086,0.00006793798,0.00038507057,0.00023010957,0.85911494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6787897,0.0023193047,0.0034807657,0.021231517,0.00046736017,0.000055154942,0.00015017352,0.00013308368,0.29337284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.991102,0.0014379488,0.00011160018,0.0013530474,0.0041187634,0.0018766304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926125,0.0019549145,0.0005274347,0.0011062187,0.0029362517,0.0008627613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037321069,0.0003636036,0.0003071697,0.0010542445,0.008996738,0.01609795,0.0015832946,0.0038573402,0.017252661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008905263,0.00033627584,0.00040608234,0.0015077436,0.014862357,0.0043963357,0.0050951266,0.006140655,0.0023225558],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021899925,0.000012920537,0.0016510685,0.00005521894,0.000013924967,0.00009669927,0.0039707734,0.0001594706,0.0005359187,0.93778795,0.034275696,0.021418428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000132536115,0.000029168748,0.0060866605,0.00019067327,0.000042758176,0.0001466962,0.0029283501,0.00083082984,0.0015379415,0.089853294,0.8982793,0.0000611918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56703836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7485362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43296164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030404322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04688913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8710229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7066850227","doi":"","title":"Judicial Appointments: The Achilles Heel of the Canadian Judiciary","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Supreme court; Judicial review; Plaintiff; Accountability; Government (linguistics); Judicial activism; Promotion (chess)","score_opus":0.025442582709469433,"score_gpt":0.28255445006911556,"score_spread":0.25711186735964614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7066850227","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11168722,0.01254927,0.00970719,0.40895504,0.0009761309,0.00013553794,0.0003987885,0.0001715034,0.45541936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9465464,0.0039507393,0.003943933,0.011389957,0.00035369763,0.000025481972,0.00006014881,0.000045316967,0.0336843],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98154265,0.0032552304,0.00036920398,0.0015409194,0.008398268,0.0048937355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863192,0.0037955048,0.0007031042,0.00061727205,0.0057094847,0.0028555018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009969752,0.00028166483,0.00051952666,0.0018956023,0.026313232,0.011807016,0.002479987,0.0033734192,0.0037867057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026164183,0.00037942073,0.0003917431,0.002790486,0.018567102,0.003040722,0.002611517,0.006973619,0.0003793609],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004004155,0.000019814557,0.004582969,0.000086024804,0.000017867394,0.00016115428,0.007867343,0.00069437065,0.00028138253,0.8994241,0.03460352,0.05222146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000096580676,0.00008412597,0.054505136,0.00085156923,0.00016847311,0.00022299809,0.027131805,0.0033376915,0.001014377,0.16563788,0.74666667,0.00028269246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98841536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87210035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12789966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25934163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9279813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7070313630","doi":"","title":"Politics and Judgment","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discover Archive (Vanderbilt University)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Constitution; Judicial review; Judicial activism; Supreme court; Judicial opinion; Legislature; Constitutionality; Convention","score_opus":0.016593980003708694,"score_gpt":0.2403598373683099,"score_spread":0.2237658573646012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7070313630","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014929002,0.01766031,0.0034537958,0.16100524,0.004224808,0.00005361849,0.0000966921,0.000056850593,0.81195575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27417535,0.0117544755,0.0033412958,0.14071153,0.007456676,0.00023464211,0.0001730733,0.00025646115,0.56189656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865905,0.005399307,0.0005190561,0.002211393,0.0035642951,0.0017154772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923543,0.0036564942,0.0003742818,0.0008303666,0.002111644,0.0006729088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01049072,0.00058371364,0.00072101835,0.0017131934,0.0145183215,0.014533919,0.0016002016,0.010032819,0.024629943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022420658,0.0004398339,0.0005589342,0.0014693486,0.027542643,0.008048835,0.005709349,0.015139399,0.007894113],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053528247,0.000005535777,0.00006272059,0.000018106319,0.0000018075186,0.00003549846,0.0008081257,0.00002993706,0.000020001062,0.9051495,0.08819154,0.005671859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006124284,0.0000064912683,0.00012847203,0.00022139118,0.0000022608717,0.000055988417,0.0009515063,0.0000784369,0.000050380568,0.21444777,0.78404385,0.000007305035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0152588645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018536815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024629943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0130152395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01630644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09443259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7070759270","doi":"","title":"Perceptions of meeting effectiveness in the Capital Health Region","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Capital (architecture); Quality (philosophy); Public health; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.005422952855856996,"score_gpt":0.18806250755415213,"score_spread":0.18263955469829513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7070759270","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9613327,0.00014239803,0.00005204927,0.0054860394,0.000022606337,0.000023898123,0.000053315503,0.0000049606,0.03288211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99738795,0.00008247119,0.000027525039,0.00043714905,0.000009468493,0.000005691337,0.000014780856,0.000003478338,0.0020315144],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99364626,0.0025438552,0.00019760258,0.0001676187,0.0010769569,0.0023677093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9804853,0.0057981876,0.0037629253,0.0002686374,0.0027636343,0.0069213295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00522603,0.00015647335,0.00028838392,0.0011652957,0.008381792,0.0053952606,0.0010040451,0.0012547038,0.008024722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01590902,0.0002665508,0.00018684988,0.0013748144,0.003621782,0.0015910389,0.0026291958,0.0023339975,0.00040197352],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000618855,0.00047438015,0.333227,0.00016715167,0.00006231186,0.0014168738,0.5895689,0.0008927044,0.0018235291,0.019081851,0.014980628,0.037685744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036159636,0.00025608018,0.3503583,0.000115858675,0.000029069412,0.0001830208,0.62968165,0.0005212868,0.0003622969,0.0007534702,0.01765652,0.00004626114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.50179774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.52482766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50179774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01357895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01563407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7071104050","doi":"","title":"The Selection of Supreme Court Judges What Can the World Learn from Canada, What Can Canada Learn from the World?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ELTE Digital Institutional Repository (EDIT) (Eötvös Loránd University)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Supreme court; Jury selection; Task (project management)","score_opus":0.016038222123975716,"score_gpt":0.20981046144395424,"score_spread":0.19377223931997853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7071104050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36071518,0.0056104115,0.0013587079,0.28654853,0.0011854721,0.00028064044,0.00222065,0.00004263619,0.3420378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9376671,0.0020496256,0.0008986244,0.025925264,0.00017630718,0.00008153221,0.0006013726,0.000065016226,0.032535147],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.974209,0.0052208095,0.00053409766,0.0018913144,0.0108255185,0.00731928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9561318,0.009765056,0.0015340826,0.0012420584,0.021702534,0.009624518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015643384,0.00027569174,0.0007425765,0.0026729146,0.022828715,0.013467434,0.002093954,0.0033854367,0.008464916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06960848,0.0003995588,0.00037802962,0.0063572535,0.007136661,0.002701558,0.0022685358,0.0051208935,0.001125536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035834633,0.00017066147,0.12871769,0.00024375123,0.00017025092,0.0010552553,0.051524825,0.0006209033,0.001172786,0.19366774,0.4943334,0.12796445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013443088,0.00009173371,0.19293302,0.0012550112,0.00017985307,0.00025402685,0.12033054,0.0014505651,0.0017679288,0.045111194,0.63617957,0.000312098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94445664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98687696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92118424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07881578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15278864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5718512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7072011262","doi":"","title":"Theoretical and Practical Problems of Metaconstitutional Review","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Element (criminal law); Supreme court; Power (physics); Order (exchange); Sovereignty; Process (computing); Constitution; Constitutional review; Compliance (psychology); Constitutional economics","score_opus":0.00673531685768227,"score_gpt":0.21608540763428374,"score_spread":0.20935009077660147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7072011262","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021091223,0.01969432,0.21432692,0.2606559,0.0026141794,0.0004897836,0.00010447984,0.00020920862,0.4808139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88067794,0.0062985555,0.060850352,0.016215343,0.0036751314,0.0013392302,0.000050783983,0.00014299637,0.030749694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9199859,0.05428033,0.0023492603,0.007148759,0.013619796,0.0026159112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81208545,0.15385176,0.0064057214,0.015402092,0.010729223,0.0015257264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.093382314,0.00053643103,0.001228814,0.0037183475,0.009948158,0.013635457,0.0048743486,0.010146122,0.006706166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1338679,0.00087783835,0.00093014055,0.003846315,0.081523344,0.022406423,0.007268009,0.011744069,0.0009325263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014486886,0.0000024467627,0.000029849944,0.00001163563,0.0000011507568,0.000013036297,0.00035380153,0.00007753185,0.0000048111683,0.9974476,0.00062049413,0.00143614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012783515,0.0000057221814,0.00005666057,0.000063630934,0.0000033745648,0.00006708555,0.00036135328,0.0005340379,0.000054863547,0.97569263,0.023139244,0.0000086779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005137861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041378587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.093382314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011371627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018068358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49385875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7072120867","doi":"","title":"A Unified Model of Public Law: \\nCharter Values and Reasonableness \\nReview in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Liquation; Diafiltration; Emperipolesis; Triacetin; Demotion","score_opus":0.058100902860395424,"score_gpt":0.24063773149830456,"score_spread":0.18253682863790913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7072120867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08120739,0.0010902103,0.014129148,0.034689903,0.00011616091,0.00009565958,0.00053177954,0.00011599419,0.86802363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9680177,0.00035654585,0.002446674,0.0009417789,0.000030104833,0.00003401381,0.00006481705,0.0000510304,0.028057288],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99382955,0.0011427604,0.00015935054,0.0006571662,0.001958992,0.0022522395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937272,0.0016714269,0.00024190657,0.00058094435,0.0027441988,0.0010342882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036742836,0.00036056014,0.0008549152,0.0026868274,0.019535955,0.018029103,0.0027765674,0.004163952,0.013352008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013049789,0.0005340625,0.000933928,0.003752088,0.019501373,0.0062170667,0.0030355384,0.0071871122,0.00053487124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004115583,0.000004712118,0.00022740464,0.00000415296,0.0000023915313,0.000013187612,0.0010300314,0.00035923708,0.000011216833,0.9953571,0.0016773805,0.0013090179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032832013,0.000009037324,0.0024104498,0.000075142765,0.00003182288,0.000037566275,0.006126065,0.006107139,0.00012813571,0.9214205,0.06356277,0.00005850339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9817312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9847712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1288174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1288174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17564015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W70809028","doi":"10.21991/c98675","title":"An Opportune Moment: The Judicial Appointment Reforms and the Judicial Credentials Demanded by the Charter","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Law; Charter; Judicial activism; Judicial review; Accountability; Judicial independence; Transparency (behavior); Economic Justice; Appeal; Supreme court; Judicial discretion; Public administration","score_opus":0.03585155082644348,"score_gpt":0.2747012195231658,"score_spread":0.2388496686967223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W70809028","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038649246,0.0053794733,0.014984074,0.60234153,0.0136769,0.00029007602,0.0001755715,0.00027703872,0.32422608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73854184,0.0019153985,0.014686479,0.08686003,0.0069412896,0.00028006028,0.00009976224,0.00025856006,0.15041658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93610907,0.028207963,0.0025109504,0.0045256736,0.014907885,0.013738446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9647259,0.01697902,0.0029327755,0.0029020708,0.0064927875,0.0059674936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.051217046,0.00030759993,0.00059881626,0.0015675386,0.022685302,0.021735009,0.002584142,0.013804392,0.0060734823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10292935,0.0008973347,0.0006401107,0.0019506095,0.017824838,0.010373697,0.004686484,0.026537744,0.0013199572],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003197021,0.0000337235,0.00043448168,0.00002865578,0.0000020870189,0.00014567074,0.0051707053,0.00016084165,0.00026430163,0.91427463,0.065174334,0.0142786205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000071143455,0.00007991149,0.0044779633,0.00025536388,0.00001055872,0.00010244178,0.00597801,0.00051224796,0.00060849934,0.08332717,0.9044235,0.00015306054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14449117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30975804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14449117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031963296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054508902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2873003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7094203703","doi":"","title":"President’s Column","year":2011,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Rhetoric; Political rhetoric; Quality (philosophy); Column (typography); Excellence","score_opus":0.0519923683062352,"score_gpt":0.22296352022741092,"score_spread":0.17097115192117573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7094203703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00032384935,0.007274762,0.00020102222,0.047886886,0.13453291,0.00014710397,0.003855955,0.0006912417,0.8050862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013233376,0.0024561258,0.00012081607,0.011617367,0.018170826,0.000059563252,0.0011507206,0.00016483154,0.9649364],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998735,0.000058542955,0.000061110964,0.00024160062,0.000700781,0.0002030378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980736,0.00012537905,0.00009780672,0.00011734847,0.0009883284,0.00059747323],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008552464,0.001330747,0.0008328715,0.0013779085,0.0020387464,0.006328463,0.001035112,0.003911588,0.5387172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039069066,0.0004528137,0.00074249436,0.0011412259,0.00049317634,0.002592763,0.0013242711,0.004295646,0.5344435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057248735,0.00000758288,0.00003467518,0.000020388901,8.502045e-7,0.000012905816,0.000003157023,0.000005026721,0.00003093734,0.0006239578,0.989995,0.009259697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002745796,0.000005140808,0.00016802526,0.000034736862,7.8745694e-7,0.000015033165,0.000007936494,0.0000069994767,0.000018545434,0.00012456569,0.99961346,0.0000020253628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048004785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012131303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5387172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013970721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035156822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6579639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096682415","doi":"","title":"ATTITUDINAL DECISION MAKING IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Civil liberties; Period (music); Politics; Civil rights; Supreme Court Decisions","score_opus":0.07344068486719543,"score_gpt":0.3090872840188165,"score_spread":0.2356465991516211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096682415","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9839153,0.00017570319,0.00009992342,0.0009683427,0.000009545553,0.00002008825,0.000703326,0.0000042007946,0.014103621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980027,0.00007373624,0.000056475455,0.000056183326,0.0000049235446,0.000003550357,0.00028611158,0.00000136862,0.0015149714],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974655,0.00030967427,0.000089856025,0.00021378094,0.0012443371,0.00067680085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98962504,0.0024699697,0.0028154792,0.00019320336,0.0034091626,0.0014871529],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020565453,0.00011521691,0.00022394996,0.0020636006,0.0033686354,0.0028852855,0.00065419235,0.00054953626,0.0049458244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011424579,0.000120986275,0.00016768822,0.0035696456,0.0012223119,0.0006244024,0.0007787076,0.0010441244,0.00033353845],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000101153484,0.00013764405,0.9587933,0.000039594557,0.000059039117,0.00026317034,0.009813346,0.001314462,0.00057415257,0.006157159,0.0057611205,0.016985819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070173137,0.000024510404,0.97776175,0.000036571382,0.000010932582,0.00003920623,0.00997303,0.0013808097,0.0002454405,0.000695498,0.009795129,0.000030110443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96119136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98547804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9786567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021343265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019369897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15485692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096765778","doi":"","title":"Judicial Policymaking in Published and Unpublished Decisions: The Case ofEnvironmental","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Politics; Judicial opinion; Judicial independence; Judicial activism; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.03867721018040781,"score_gpt":0.31116227950187614,"score_spread":0.2724850693214683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096765778","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46920136,0.011628137,0.020323882,0.26238796,0.0020167022,0.00016497426,0.00049954763,0.000118566786,0.23365891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95974445,0.0019661412,0.005302421,0.01754103,0.0016861659,0.00011470827,0.00010494889,0.00007731453,0.013462821],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9106139,0.052981377,0.0053306944,0.008559386,0.017352698,0.0051618353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.48492393,0.44056883,0.029481497,0.021338217,0.02010983,0.0035776645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12657695,0.00031059273,0.0007756131,0.003051687,0.012302773,0.013957608,0.0024187579,0.013247215,0.0058080363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32151392,0.00067689805,0.0010084237,0.004688373,0.013987512,0.008753192,0.0037904938,0.00831933,0.00089798303],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018802744,0.00016436716,0.024545807,0.00020836174,0.00012646193,0.0030541923,0.025912104,0.0024799288,0.00077894714,0.84146124,0.03923675,0.06184377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018800581,0.00018278124,0.04950594,0.0015205288,0.0003310703,0.002083232,0.022289455,0.01084817,0.0052976226,0.5952516,0.31208113,0.00042046115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010853617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024828536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12657695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008117219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009271004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6694108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097024748","doi":"","title":"Constructive Unamendability in","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive; Proposition; Focus (optics); Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.017988719828459288,"score_gpt":0.2998503682257887,"score_spread":0.2818616483973294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097024748","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014696563,0.0018321505,0.016606215,0.01153206,0.00040880995,0.000051788815,0.00009606155,0.00008611609,0.95469034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9245807,0.0008356558,0.004822093,0.0028130412,0.0004669398,0.00014633362,0.000089534304,0.00010852328,0.066137254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98910636,0.00457603,0.00029586026,0.0016468839,0.0024981773,0.0018767583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895353,0.0048688212,0.00046868005,0.002129077,0.002646996,0.0003512592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01145225,0.000593313,0.00076600554,0.0016865974,0.011488633,0.011784027,0.0026208262,0.0038531173,0.0118763605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020451354,0.00058616954,0.00069412385,0.0016692652,0.04356962,0.008031352,0.006963802,0.00705852,0.0015286206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017297203,0.0000013634743,0.000016011652,0.0000032120322,6.995183e-7,0.000009692747,0.00023856168,0.00002795498,0.000009652647,0.998694,0.0006170259,0.0003802216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009926083,0.0000027607175,0.00007219441,0.000033634282,0.000005786516,0.000020551246,0.0003355939,0.0002288689,0.00019079121,0.9677871,0.031307317,0.000005520837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02013413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033356246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02013413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015118469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015081812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10969263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097228599","doi":"","title":"Equality Cases and the Attitudinal Model in the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Voting; Politics; Public opinion; Voting behavior; Judicial opinion; Precedent; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.14852605428557633,"score_gpt":0.33979537486561356,"score_spread":0.19126932058003723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097228599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6495154,0.0010815988,0.0010967712,0.018517602,0.00011198999,0.000060643295,0.00033391803,0.000019156947,0.32926297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99302775,0.00020573204,0.0001481821,0.0006878485,0.000020326604,0.0000055481205,0.000035038258,0.000003881669,0.0058656335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996427,0.00048388538,0.000060433285,0.0003270434,0.0011100969,0.00159143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958038,0.0009613307,0.00035263403,0.00013661478,0.0015872542,0.0011583111],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025069104,0.00014167548,0.00029912914,0.0016135197,0.013621643,0.006666929,0.0012704779,0.0015285071,0.006656242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011174479,0.00023444544,0.00032228744,0.0023811685,0.0069831316,0.0017824798,0.0020546713,0.0022590659,0.00033961426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071475864,0.00014979592,0.0758867,0.000034708082,0.000034570658,0.00044092763,0.012824326,0.001699614,0.00042052352,0.879529,0.011900909,0.017007481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014520904,0.000100957,0.4828755,0.00026977665,0.00017293092,0.00033705457,0.043151278,0.018860241,0.0010924512,0.30589363,0.14687404,0.00022685017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.979116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9876885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07823984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07823984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05516334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5676725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097752533","doi":"","title":"Judicial Decision Making In the Supreme Court of Canada: Updating the Personal Attribute Model","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Parliament; Control (management); Remand (court procedure); Original jurisdiction; Legislation","score_opus":0.08209244764457337,"score_gpt":0.31948021376078894,"score_spread":0.2373877661162156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097752533","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4807976,0.006681021,0.078735724,0.06901888,0.0005540633,0.0003096108,0.0017290942,0.00014072786,0.36203328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98910904,0.0008042614,0.004461336,0.0010949805,0.00010864541,0.00002266027,0.00014842661,0.000030594503,0.0042201853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98801047,0.0039519076,0.0003360207,0.0016004408,0.003709568,0.0023915472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9617578,0.021473954,0.00217705,0.0027196005,0.008839904,0.0030316487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016210893,0.00047905423,0.0013287783,0.003081481,0.008690664,0.012755962,0.003918371,0.0035468813,0.008417633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05351471,0.0005712024,0.00091268506,0.0047720643,0.0153047955,0.006881014,0.003108178,0.0066904547,0.00052720046],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016858835,0.000095093215,0.015654616,0.00009214869,0.000100288366,0.0002504675,0.005864404,0.017585391,0.00012230303,0.927631,0.007534124,0.024901574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001307656,0.000049539485,0.02053621,0.0002121746,0.00016274895,0.000109650406,0.0036051644,0.07202426,0.00023246685,0.8732878,0.029464964,0.00018431184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9134349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9330071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08656508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05059824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05390811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36711764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7098044611","doi":"","title":"Photos","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Supreme Court Decisions; Original jurisdiction; Majority opinion; Precedent; Test (biology)","score_opus":0.09985443721546977,"score_gpt":0.34062479856669353,"score_spread":0.24077036135122376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7098044611","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010475306,0.0008267467,0.0027687144,0.002470706,0.0030213748,0.00022840218,0.019740302,0.003145539,0.9667507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0107584335,0.0008308555,0.0043576043,0.0016409807,0.0006911703,0.00014429899,0.015963435,0.0023041086,0.96330905],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99968517,0.00002514139,0.00000811244,0.00006494257,0.0001744536,0.000042214193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939,0.000073209514,0.000020166011,0.000084009116,0.0003206947,0.00011190809],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025383141,0.0008670065,0.00052006694,0.0015394292,0.0026756718,0.0025285124,0.0010710112,0.0013661764,0.7692446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015995185,0.00040464944,0.00063579326,0.0014986899,0.00040285313,0.0021981052,0.001616706,0.0017783697,0.43494385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027121501,0.000011803417,0.00011607192,0.00005675477,0.000001880721,0.000095939366,0.000084813844,0.00005321691,0.0002263217,0.0011059991,0.96990526,0.028314779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059706767,0.00000540183,0.00053114886,0.000043572418,0.0000022250783,0.00014850034,0.00016385151,0.00009705363,0.00011390705,0.0005996418,0.9982811,0.000007703188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021115635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047637656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23075539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012093259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008895437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7101388796","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17451482","title":"Constitutional Identity and the Limits of Constitutional Change","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Discovery Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional economics; Constitutional law; Identity (music); Normative; Transformative learning; Democracy; Constitutional court; Flexibility (engineering)","score_opus":0.0928225635029021,"score_gpt":0.3136442251716125,"score_spread":0.2208216616687104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7101388796","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11957871,0.007703011,0.08030292,0.03399291,0.00030726023,0.0001148958,0.00009403439,0.00010747866,0.75779885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885549,0.0008617045,0.0055285534,0.0010479471,0.00020685427,0.00012775694,0.000028160106,0.000024500341,0.0036195917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9735188,0.013363694,0.0014059758,0.0046966285,0.005020539,0.0019943726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.970433,0.020346262,0.0016489815,0.0051856567,0.0015560886,0.0008300639],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02220388,0.00026098147,0.0009305129,0.0025569494,0.0068254615,0.012617527,0.0017944153,0.004140626,0.0032074938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029887673,0.0004570096,0.000733805,0.0016486022,0.08907628,0.013331218,0.011302341,0.0062130224,0.00035109886],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024211045,0.0000022667646,0.000051197796,0.0000047247713,0.0000011548091,0.0000069376288,0.00035878152,0.000098491895,0.000033458575,0.9981146,0.000045537956,0.0012804565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010951012,0.000011605733,0.00014674861,0.000030393985,0.0000029186701,0.00002601566,0.00034744394,0.00024299487,0.000108820044,0.9910155,0.008050664,0.0000059498634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019577267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009792565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02220388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052710404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056161555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11742675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102758668","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0035","title":"A rule-of-law compliant reading of section 33: The continuing relevance of Lorraine Weinrib’s public law scholarship","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Jurisprudence; Constitution; Section (typography); Legislature; Scholarship; Rule of law; Public law; Legislation","score_opus":0.028029359702664902,"score_gpt":0.26856022067914115,"score_spread":0.24053086097647625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102758668","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01259197,0.013469769,0.014812685,0.71851283,0.0042201295,0.000021295822,0.000057606467,0.000091834336,0.2362218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7882625,0.008091116,0.005941209,0.1355153,0.005422897,0.0000624013,0.000053312546,0.00019349823,0.056457777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99275255,0.0024284958,0.00017463403,0.0009352708,0.0026623863,0.0010466367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9835856,0.011438651,0.0005467866,0.0013387003,0.0023142537,0.0007761269],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009868597,0.00028471276,0.00065904536,0.0013582,0.011044075,0.0148608,0.0019855655,0.010383061,0.0031195057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021961054,0.0004398109,0.0005067243,0.0015531915,0.04163685,0.012425323,0.0037181617,0.019267736,0.0007278412],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032422074,0.0000098132305,0.00006788354,0.0000068855716,8.877262e-7,0.000022843571,0.001665955,0.00009420615,0.000024957599,0.982916,0.011951981,0.0032353427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010310821,0.000012231275,0.00035190914,0.00019263437,0.000004544012,0.000043748063,0.0020000427,0.0007025635,0.00020781637,0.6849569,0.31149015,0.000027035578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.110616006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10462175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.110616006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024290424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02556107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2199443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7103340190","doi":"","title":"President’s Column","year":2011,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Insecta mundi","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Association (psychology); Curse; Energy (signal processing); Appeal","score_opus":0.09204552440087714,"score_gpt":0.28384439445270926,"score_spread":0.1917988700518321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7103340190","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004253784,0.011686567,0.00022323609,0.11283845,0.24242766,0.00022084649,0.0026651432,0.0006336249,0.62887913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014264325,0.0035157483,0.00011362316,0.026562758,0.027311541,0.00008861631,0.0007929282,0.000135986,0.9400524],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988023,0.00006665803,0.000058041,0.00022153856,0.00063998206,0.00021148432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978313,0.0001538794,0.000092501046,0.00010034614,0.0010264581,0.00079556723],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001067801,0.0012318856,0.000791762,0.0011420584,0.0019573132,0.005376927,0.0010594811,0.0054032984,0.4250298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041626845,0.00044148663,0.00071896374,0.0009042757,0.00046780874,0.0024835735,0.0014362665,0.005137052,0.39404395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045884153,0.000006201096,0.000028414266,0.000016934602,5.843739e-7,0.000013710214,0.0000030612227,0.0000033752285,0.000020774429,0.0003200366,0.9935144,0.0060678935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028769468,0.000004893758,0.00019874242,0.000039149,6.709402e-7,0.00001659848,0.000011292614,0.000006960575,0.000012884891,0.00008751462,0.99961627,0.0000020767332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040834034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011306854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4250298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013250748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00348968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82012516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7104277713","doi":"10.71781/2284","title":"La constitutionnalisation de la juridiction inhérente au Canada : origines et fondements","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Indignation; Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.007287449746726094,"score_gpt":0.22592535253272739,"score_spread":0.2186379027860013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7104277713","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18520628,0.006102205,0.014348549,0.015875056,0.00024451982,0.00008205445,0.0005730029,0.00009782364,0.7774705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92476827,0.0020447066,0.0025408096,0.00073283067,0.00004912343,0.000027058382,0.00012524765,0.000048400463,0.069663525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99745077,0.0003457671,0.000051328592,0.00040847974,0.0009577178,0.0007858882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981798,0.00028858177,0.0001371033,0.00015999527,0.00091060234,0.00032397325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015909343,0.00032278776,0.00036063837,0.001620083,0.015020101,0.010968388,0.0013620316,0.0014358985,0.0069451663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003643729,0.00029006044,0.0003167487,0.0026323462,0.02148944,0.002470434,0.0031801215,0.003397789,0.00033660588],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012965031,0.0000039511556,0.0016984727,0.000031530202,0.000008095563,0.00010868042,0.01765078,0.00030211356,0.00027148103,0.97150165,0.0019407204,0.0064695706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036797504,0.000030565378,0.0375273,0.0006949049,0.00010496318,0.000311336,0.037044175,0.0017472156,0.0017827114,0.2687688,0.6517444,0.00020683472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9602797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97731245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.085911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.085911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11604333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62333083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7104278180","doi":"10.71781/1860","title":"Le rôle des tribunaux dans le développement des droits constitutionnels : constitutionnalisation et opérationnalisation judiciaire","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"China Scholarship Council","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Legislation; Constitution; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.07766201551129671,"score_gpt":0.3502454889524633,"score_spread":0.2725834734411666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7104278180","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2538214,0.003880743,0.01688251,0.01772446,0.0001689081,0.000071684415,0.0000727606,0.000039912204,0.70733774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9741243,0.000576201,0.0017151928,0.0003848942,0.000028312234,0.000019996849,0.000016451078,0.00002050559,0.02311412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955083,0.0018283317,0.000105874205,0.000442227,0.0011689985,0.0009462113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99621224,0.0013040202,0.00033809422,0.00047180246,0.0011011316,0.00057275523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039052984,0.00018281161,0.00026026732,0.0015857884,0.009030993,0.008880382,0.0011473452,0.0012449945,0.004419924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071066665,0.00019321687,0.00025423177,0.0021413348,0.03396705,0.0035357988,0.0030001057,0.0030486858,0.00028155156],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046120763,0.0000042213073,0.00068651943,0.000009615308,0.0000014513706,0.000032761163,0.011319397,0.000093122144,0.00016676332,0.98359793,0.00039673634,0.0036868951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003765222,0.00007433472,0.034470394,0.00037675514,0.000040769217,0.00021521427,0.06265808,0.0020134992,0.001899435,0.56554174,0.33259374,0.00007837329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33431652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48293728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33431652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026470186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03035303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66474116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7104848950","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17585110","title":"Constitutionalism and the Nature of the Rule of Law: From Formal Legality to Moral Legitimacy","year":2025,"lang":"ang","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Discovery Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Constitutionalism; Legitimacy; Positivism; Consequentialism; Economic Justice; Legal positivism; Rule of law","score_opus":0.02940059947089649,"score_gpt":0.28024102670175005,"score_spread":0.25084042723085354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7104848950","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3242501,0.011676209,0.101308286,0.056552656,0.0005871397,0.00008922642,0.00008403425,0.00009112076,0.5053612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994858,0.0006714112,0.0026345728,0.0003222276,0.00009363961,0.000016197051,0.000011329881,0.00001349453,0.0013790799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99238974,0.0046587945,0.0002567061,0.00072574377,0.001392621,0.00057638204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9787719,0.015897674,0.0019477243,0.0015017125,0.0012845196,0.0005964425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011122202,0.00018168555,0.00048684416,0.0021862607,0.0033512628,0.009986568,0.00087697135,0.002083732,0.0023640315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02360503,0.00023824644,0.00032071292,0.0015660184,0.057745922,0.010999613,0.0036527053,0.0045430395,0.0001795836],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028602879,0.0000053534327,0.00017785831,0.000008896748,0.0000012100277,0.000012024771,0.00079917215,0.00012830227,0.00005303332,0.9968399,0.000063404266,0.0019080758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008980423,0.000014116055,0.00068588427,0.000052282514,0.0000024015665,0.0000295616,0.0005947859,0.0004563211,0.00012138556,0.9902158,0.0078099887,0.000008484715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003111834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002099894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011122202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050248485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00520668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058820486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7104865798","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17585168","title":"Constitutionalism as a Moral Project: Between Legal Authority and Political Obligation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Discovery Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Obedience; Legitimacy; Obligation; Politics; Duty; Normative; Legal positivism; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.06358289927890226,"score_gpt":0.3329708058627501,"score_spread":0.2693879065838478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7104865798","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.115123406,0.009170232,0.09919088,0.091756456,0.0010685932,0.00006177649,0.00004968432,0.000092969145,0.68348604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98919815,0.00085173774,0.0031643333,0.0014656252,0.00039230092,0.00004750942,0.000012899105,0.000037030524,0.004830343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.988325,0.007884434,0.00035355776,0.00088229845,0.0016569694,0.00089773495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851149,0.011359446,0.000966971,0.0010384063,0.0007543285,0.0007659956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012008769,0.00026444276,0.0004299023,0.001717016,0.0059895804,0.010992089,0.0010141984,0.00330926,0.0034976949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019068204,0.0003156216,0.00044047862,0.0013025078,0.07882732,0.016614223,0.008238548,0.006100872,0.0003723586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016897629,0.0000034083535,0.000056823017,0.000005666535,6.6585756e-7,0.000011049903,0.0014766478,0.000039710645,0.00002202626,0.9973104,0.00013633863,0.0009355822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000084020285,0.0000069054036,0.00018720215,0.000041903066,0.0000017546258,0.00002515533,0.0009953857,0.00017218178,0.00004849099,0.98513424,0.013373052,0.0000053741396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027085235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019163012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012008769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043967864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00659103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063509226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7105093787","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17585169","title":"Constitutionalism as a Moral Project: Between Legal Authority and Political Obligation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Discovery Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Obedience; Legitimacy; Obligation; Politics; Duty; Normative; Legal positivism; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.06358289927890226,"score_gpt":0.3329708058627501,"score_spread":0.2693879065838478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7105093787","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.115123406,0.009170232,0.09919088,0.091756456,0.0010685932,0.00006177649,0.00004968432,0.000092969145,0.68348604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98919815,0.00085173774,0.0031643333,0.0014656252,0.00039230092,0.00004750942,0.000012899105,0.000037030524,0.004830343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.988325,0.007884434,0.00035355776,0.00088229845,0.0016569694,0.00089773495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851149,0.011359446,0.000966971,0.0010384063,0.0007543285,0.0007659956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012008769,0.00026444276,0.0004299023,0.001717016,0.0059895804,0.010992089,0.0010141984,0.00330926,0.0034976949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019068204,0.0003156216,0.00044047862,0.0013025078,0.07882732,0.016614223,0.008238548,0.006100872,0.0003723586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016897629,0.0000034083535,0.000056823017,0.000005666535,6.6585756e-7,0.000011049903,0.0014766478,0.000039710645,0.00002202626,0.9973104,0.00013633863,0.0009355822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000084020285,0.0000069054036,0.00018720215,0.000041903066,0.0000017546258,0.00002515533,0.0009953857,0.00017218178,0.00004849099,0.98513424,0.013373052,0.0000053741396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027085235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019163012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012008769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043967864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00659103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063509226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7105181057","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17585111","title":"Constitutionalism and the Nature of the Rule of Law: From Formal Legality to Moral Legitimacy","year":2025,"lang":"ang","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Discovery Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Constitutionalism; Legitimacy; Positivism; Consequentialism; Economic Justice; Legal positivism; Rule of law","score_opus":0.02940059947089649,"score_gpt":0.28024102670175005,"score_spread":0.25084042723085354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7105181057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3242501,0.011676209,0.101308286,0.056552656,0.0005871397,0.00008922642,0.00008403425,0.00009112076,0.5053612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994858,0.0006714112,0.0026345728,0.0003222276,0.00009363961,0.000016197051,0.000011329881,0.00001349453,0.0013790799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99238974,0.0046587945,0.0002567061,0.00072574377,0.001392621,0.00057638204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9787719,0.015897674,0.0019477243,0.0015017125,0.0012845196,0.0005964425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011122202,0.00018168555,0.00048684416,0.0021862607,0.0033512628,0.009986568,0.00087697135,0.002083732,0.0023640315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02360503,0.00023824644,0.00032071292,0.0015660184,0.057745922,0.010999613,0.0036527053,0.0045430395,0.0001795836],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028602879,0.0000053534327,0.00017785831,0.000008896748,0.0000012100277,0.000012024771,0.00079917215,0.00012830227,0.00005303332,0.9968399,0.000063404266,0.0019080758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008980423,0.000014116055,0.00068588427,0.000052282514,0.0000024015665,0.0000295616,0.0005947859,0.0004563211,0.00012138556,0.9902158,0.0078099887,0.000008484715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003111834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002099894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011122202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050248485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00520668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058820486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7107862683","doi":"10.1111/capa.70040","title":"The History and Administration of Third‐Party Interventions at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Administration (probate law); Intervention (counseling); Psychological intervention; Remand (court procedure); Corporate governance; High Court","score_opus":0.03663017864356681,"score_gpt":0.28119568281881535,"score_spread":0.24456550417524853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7107862683","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3667645,0.012896747,0.0062535466,0.061836623,0.0005429179,0.00026839194,0.0009360503,0.00019334423,0.550308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773372,0.001402331,0.0005319766,0.001991127,0.00004769196,0.000026608523,0.00005844222,0.00003363308,0.018570922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98818225,0.0018958156,0.00021913074,0.0011449183,0.0036220786,0.0049358173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98862445,0.0029143079,0.0007523263,0.00045292077,0.0052432884,0.0020126922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052716606,0.00029925778,0.00055108074,0.0035081145,0.027683064,0.012123555,0.0024656656,0.0036060968,0.0056204363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014117575,0.00057862676,0.0003715875,0.0044021187,0.027992142,0.0016679912,0.0034146819,0.0065106046,0.00027162192],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003804932,0.00004365289,0.00685203,0.00008110014,0.000035245048,0.00047245444,0.039537758,0.0015248551,0.00060208444,0.9074856,0.018172327,0.025154797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037476122,0.00007682168,0.078525856,0.00077601505,0.00008849241,0.00022461882,0.03376987,0.0028164596,0.0015851056,0.043010075,0.8387185,0.00037066737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9944931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99711835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68601847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.31398156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2791253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79568416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7113185110","doi":"","title":"Constitutionalism, Judicial Review, and Progressive Change","year":2005,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Constitution; Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Judicial activism; Judicial review; Welfare; Welfare rights","score_opus":0.03583933071686711,"score_gpt":0.3072852877758966,"score_spread":0.27144595705902946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7113185110","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041263923,0.053428236,0.025198037,0.19034098,0.0020926995,0.0001982563,0.00007749049,0.00010862742,0.6872917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94860137,0.010104276,0.0027542256,0.0155147435,0.0026081286,0.00011140815,0.000043239816,0.000035609846,0.020227091],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9682645,0.015073856,0.0009705872,0.0032942623,0.008551555,0.003845155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96793,0.022607815,0.0027339966,0.0020852871,0.0035960022,0.0010469714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025301436,0.0002915012,0.0005968545,0.0031848187,0.0067545194,0.009721858,0.001756886,0.0050500073,0.0043828296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04690791,0.00028555223,0.000633843,0.0023580738,0.035926778,0.0075472873,0.005540942,0.005736985,0.00042533444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030729796,0.000008859229,0.000105558756,0.000017805804,0.0000035855094,0.000026769349,0.00043972267,0.00013384546,0.000017338201,0.9931491,0.0018243066,0.0042700833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003898998,0.000025750043,0.000535741,0.00012058098,0.000009801814,0.00006317892,0.00052879896,0.00036973442,0.00014092855,0.9138201,0.084331185,0.000015252336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00950471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008905527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025301436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010713682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012461179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13380843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7114914261","doi":"10.1017/s0008423925100966","title":"Sticking to Our Lanes: A Survey of Selected Studies on Federalism, Aboriginal Rights, and <i>Charter</i> Jurisprudence in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Legitimacy; Judicial review; Federalism; Scholarship; Politics; Power (physics); Constitutional law","score_opus":0.028206167991238994,"score_gpt":0.3526171193464236,"score_spread":0.3244109513551846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7114914261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90303594,0.052742377,0.00025657128,0.009860289,0.00012668657,0.00011650831,0.0055802413,0.000013260879,0.02826806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9705528,0.025388002,0.00024470227,0.0012969408,0.000040921124,0.000054608114,0.0010625653,0.000019775729,0.0013396398],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912362,0.0016617336,0.000836241,0.0007014826,0.004435484,0.0011288914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9082551,0.0410017,0.014117215,0.002157449,0.030339476,0.004129111],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011607702,0.00025918594,0.00086837594,0.019522935,0.008662783,0.0073972666,0.0017735916,0.0009531471,0.003778623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036899034,0.000397864,0.00034143255,0.061779205,0.0070318,0.0022189505,0.0025520509,0.0010491497,0.0002146369],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010098305,0.00006145954,0.4229107,0.0053953812,0.00024740104,0.0009926639,0.46506974,0.0001684206,0.00094926654,0.011739502,0.019006625,0.073357925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008850934,0.00003597454,0.6532613,0.004115931,0.00010892355,0.0002042971,0.26964906,0.00009870451,0.0002639939,0.00054494507,0.071643345,0.00006469651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9677509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9893238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045445014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045445014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09191388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3297282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7114994978","doi":"10.2307/jj.36075940.9","title":"Four Views of Metis Constitutionalism","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Les Presses de l’Université d’Ottawa | University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.04225955117286926,"score_gpt":0.2366520276689245,"score_spread":0.19439247649605523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7114994978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022296697,0.005791624,0.0076941866,0.06812741,0.0005988331,0.0000360391,0.00017480859,0.0000552662,0.89522505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9290888,0.0012828975,0.002779988,0.0040674126,0.00039185947,0.00011679729,0.00006130029,0.00007480017,0.062136136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928035,0.0033420085,0.0002047122,0.00072898157,0.0013494195,0.0015712761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949496,0.0022506558,0.0003302305,0.00096448936,0.0009968008,0.00050827535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005704958,0.00056112726,0.00077694317,0.0021599878,0.011413232,0.016651222,0.0022973216,0.0058738836,0.007227709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0096556,0.00068982947,0.0005523955,0.0025582183,0.06000163,0.009248148,0.004350215,0.010532733,0.00076841377],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027720614,0.0000012914132,0.000013927088,0.0000027240453,4.0840555e-7,0.000004025114,0.0007361484,0.000012370846,0.000005540785,0.9983012,0.00066474645,0.000254867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018965342,0.000004905357,0.00026390568,0.000066857014,0.000006679561,0.000027349604,0.0034330832,0.00017458925,0.0001240246,0.9331973,0.06266801,0.000014259817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06218642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.077043176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9378136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024905974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011863004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18070632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7115038777","doi":"","title":"The Bork Bloc","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Supreme court; Legislature; State (computer science); Federalism; Treaty","score_opus":0.020897018123374807,"score_gpt":0.2801354613078463,"score_spread":0.2592384431844715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7115038777","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022683155,0.0072839675,0.0029288367,0.06106406,0.0044787955,0.00006461254,0.00023362927,0.00024095997,0.90102196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2523735,0.002212796,0.0013378647,0.014062848,0.00044694205,0.00004450894,0.00012684158,0.0002554436,0.72913927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970988,0.00069679273,0.000089377805,0.0007475937,0.00073157606,0.00063578406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884653,0.00028997162,0.00012755643,0.00016838156,0.00035907218,0.0002084681],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016796428,0.00041699826,0.00031742133,0.00070895016,0.009390704,0.009003548,0.0006727057,0.0027831488,0.036441505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057848985,0.00039656006,0.00032855326,0.00062993664,0.007135134,0.0036806064,0.0039261864,0.0053708456,0.011547766],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006500434,0.000017076658,0.0009623754,0.000058414113,0.000007841547,0.0003364852,0.0061415,0.00009811488,0.00047493124,0.78672147,0.17429346,0.030823268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007335976,0.00001553546,0.000701848,0.000114009155,0.000004371906,0.00014690615,0.0020283929,0.00008675171,0.00037011324,0.014473733,0.98203355,0.000017389351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044228543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08314885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044228543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007512284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007991063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12190896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7115812723","doi":"","title":"The Metaphysics of Constitutional Precommitment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"MacSphere (McMaster University)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Precommitment; Metaphysics; Rationality; Capital (architecture); Economic Justice","score_opus":0.026570253428206805,"score_gpt":0.26186766972581715,"score_spread":0.23529741629761036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7115812723","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054130446,0.0065364824,0.102679044,0.0630103,0.0005935353,0.00011679736,0.0003209671,0.00016629566,0.7724461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9680324,0.0015661214,0.009641889,0.002519825,0.0006180555,0.00021722021,0.000112874135,0.00006382634,0.017227722],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922679,0.0036603122,0.00032544797,0.0010566206,0.0018109045,0.0008788528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958371,0.0021266323,0.00037289027,0.0010315866,0.00044433,0.00018743805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007460555,0.00033872217,0.0004888381,0.0015743665,0.004800962,0.009611336,0.001554108,0.0039346223,0.0054222355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009788169,0.00040410936,0.0007076218,0.0014053121,0.046334486,0.011919683,0.003893626,0.0073875887,0.00077525433],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.1322836e-7,0.0000010182898,0.000009126868,0.0000024337744,4.6577688e-7,0.000003376484,0.00012129566,0.000060016282,0.000009224419,0.99943393,0.00013845254,0.0002198986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053210624,0.000001829096,0.00005681822,0.000014555543,0.0000013170176,0.0000075993803,0.00010746612,0.00028962,0.000040265335,0.9926272,0.00684548,0.0000026576593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074508474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030730565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010324395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010324395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055641276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07490903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116851784","doi":"10.1017/lsr.2025.10044","title":"The unintended consequences of increased access to justice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unintended consequences; Economic Justice; Scholarship; Empirical evidence; Empirical research","score_opus":0.057704401300537965,"score_gpt":0.3951120438434858,"score_spread":0.33740764254294786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116851784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42007622,0.0063504633,0.008050633,0.16766194,0.0008075506,0.000086242704,0.00056149607,0.0000799581,0.39632547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902912,0.0006946237,0.0003704596,0.005269176,0.00013133095,0.000030275361,0.000026126185,0.000011290635,0.0031755823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98355824,0.007975392,0.0007555422,0.0017545461,0.0032274611,0.0027288261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9541136,0.025539087,0.0058214897,0.0072686467,0.005124937,0.0021321618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010239478,0.00016749407,0.000518341,0.0011101279,0.0029904936,0.0053496254,0.0014768133,0.003404162,0.01644445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036495075,0.00026147734,0.00041444885,0.00077476026,0.016787937,0.006042219,0.0062046195,0.0045126043,0.0007296796],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014842243,0.0002687865,0.015490093,0.00031293696,0.00007824222,0.00057475665,0.0061109923,0.0007487537,0.0011907276,0.9362075,0.0074794944,0.0313894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010765255,0.00038990195,0.051459957,0.001293599,0.00017294337,0.0007081173,0.01562001,0.0011207574,0.0031984781,0.839163,0.086674154,0.00009131814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004391613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00621506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01644445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002950696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039311294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055012167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117924085","doi":"10.56975/ijnrd.v10i8.309012","title":"Inherent Powers and the Doctrine of Separation of Powers: A Constitutional Analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Novel Research and Development","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Separation of powers; Enumerated powers; Arbitrariness; Constitution; Doctrine; Legislature; Judicial review; Constitutional law; Jurisprudence; Constitutional economics","score_opus":0.09072042846149428,"score_gpt":0.45346536969248,"score_spread":0.3627449412309858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117924085","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05121798,0.010089266,0.2100726,0.05470481,0.0013044575,0.00020648573,0.00023976463,0.00016670518,0.67199785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9474786,0.0026979218,0.026520316,0.0052202023,0.0008578358,0.00027109092,0.00006018141,0.000057441826,0.01683645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894231,0.00490288,0.000492739,0.0011385989,0.002892673,0.0011499897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99127686,0.0060749208,0.00044825577,0.0010126742,0.00084442244,0.00034289114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012080628,0.00043950786,0.0006784329,0.0023901877,0.0055401353,0.010327474,0.002241572,0.0034221658,0.0032160152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011585976,0.0004481349,0.0010760414,0.0021576704,0.04194999,0.010038456,0.004583529,0.009353902,0.00037162963],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.4538714e-7,8.534216e-7,0.0000142455365,0.0000028004667,5.2863265e-7,0.000006833558,0.00018132167,0.00005409634,0.000012951315,0.99919575,0.00009218259,0.0004378765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058899545,0.000011762178,0.00017927818,0.00006915621,0.000007848193,0.000056114535,0.00035132645,0.0005897555,0.00017045287,0.9671233,0.03141755,0.000017469625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0091486825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007897579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012080628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007024689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007833736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063889205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117960618","doi":"10.1007/978-3-662-71934-3_6","title":"How and Why Do Courts Cite? An Empirical Study Using the Example of the Federal Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Empirical research; Citation; Federal court; Remand (court procedure); Original jurisdiction; Judicial review; Court of record","score_opus":0.05954335106800677,"score_gpt":0.29481777521113206,"score_spread":0.2352744241431253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117960618","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6991613,0.009562039,0.0010636942,0.021611186,0.00020175891,0.00015426814,0.0012648546,0.00004991031,0.266931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97531223,0.0034016827,0.0004555057,0.0019669163,0.00012089503,0.00004605541,0.0003596671,0.000039791852,0.018297343],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.989254,0.0026516826,0.00034902024,0.0008576854,0.004596927,0.0022906156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9278425,0.047751337,0.0055159954,0.0011963332,0.015164699,0.0025291303],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052782786,0.00029013096,0.00073733163,0.0071727377,0.022026502,0.017270807,0.0027814277,0.005259725,0.006767184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07563822,0.00045898248,0.00030312885,0.026257886,0.01027728,0.008762526,0.0023300769,0.0041597406,0.0008760017],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016976893,0.00066200015,0.16552456,0.00054109877,0.00012706475,0.0017796834,0.35958588,0.0005733195,0.0007523787,0.30907306,0.07583396,0.0853772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000076609096,0.00008335267,0.27428186,0.0010449579,0.00029841883,0.0005890335,0.51742524,0.0015011275,0.0009929291,0.042106967,0.16145973,0.00013981169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9130447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96368796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9947217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045870073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0493458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33281225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7123359246","doi":"10.1017/s0008423923000793","title":"The Ascent of the Canadian Judicial Council: Bill C-9 and the Move Towards Judicialized Governance","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Delegate; Legislature; Judicial discretion; Judicial independence; Judicial activism; Legislation; Misconduct; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.031223740899487658,"score_gpt":0.2833177113590427,"score_spread":0.25209397045955506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7123359246","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.094026506,0.0023071566,0.0036395886,0.475882,0.0009169457,0.000146719,0.00032442098,0.000088922636,0.42266783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9247792,0.00064600504,0.0019833252,0.039433394,0.00023316842,0.000042537376,0.00006567065,0.000025099134,0.032791626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9851258,0.0026526384,0.0002757788,0.0012162236,0.005811244,0.0049184277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98277676,0.0041768225,0.0012648457,0.00090476294,0.006437334,0.0044394527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010299912,0.00019172393,0.00022600536,0.0016826567,0.016243747,0.012592838,0.0022463335,0.007551571,0.0059932577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023014266,0.0003628084,0.00033371148,0.0017417256,0.021463592,0.0022124378,0.0036300146,0.008567859,0.00034015247],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017175247,0.000016459753,0.0025144306,0.00001941802,0.0000041077983,0.00014389191,0.0034565658,0.00023710536,0.00022064404,0.943132,0.04436131,0.0058769546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008219278,0.000055255558,0.041518245,0.00036556978,0.000028883764,0.00014688516,0.008446545,0.0014560553,0.00080188166,0.13526158,0.81164753,0.00018932187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94829637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97157335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9059277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0940723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1855532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6825455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7125679205","doi":"10.1515/9781773855196-052","title":"6.5 Interventions at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.040040021078515425,"score_gpt":0.2312220232017084,"score_spread":0.19118200212319297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7125679205","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011202669,0.007986695,0.0009430517,0.04338355,0.0009903079,0.000086186985,0.00045933455,0.000055446148,0.9348928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31575888,0.0034688497,0.0011946977,0.038964283,0.00036756558,0.00012517041,0.00021403485,0.00008008645,0.6398265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956584,0.00045209783,0.000060534338,0.0003618611,0.0013350185,0.0021320852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845886,0.0002904136,0.0000450757,0.00006937861,0.0008805693,0.00025566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017526463,0.00057268195,0.00037940918,0.0013058281,0.022909781,0.00730829,0.0017784594,0.009311825,0.02054157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005458822,0.0004024148,0.0005735294,0.0015029323,0.0048168334,0.0016213808,0.0017606188,0.0069419243,0.0017244541],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021610724,0.000020891846,0.0008216575,0.000041988955,0.000012069234,0.00014111353,0.0016446593,0.0003002384,0.00019399301,0.8243525,0.16154227,0.010906942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034452045,0.00002100974,0.005740103,0.00029856805,0.000050884395,0.00005807369,0.0023967784,0.00078329083,0.0005644938,0.06595123,0.92404634,0.00005491599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9610135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9882935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05947486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05947486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10496372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4315223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7125689301","doi":"10.1515/9781773855196-014","title":"2.3 The Canadian Judicial System","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.028164611037194507,"score_gpt":0.20860492806226472,"score_spread":0.1804403170250702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7125689301","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027751983,0.0070989155,0.0006347538,0.013525668,0.00033625597,0.000031971023,0.00036642014,0.00003510259,0.9751958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1701313,0.0070408173,0.0013162711,0.0101559535,0.0003131398,0.00006932224,0.00032170716,0.000078575315,0.8105729],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769837,0.00020097705,0.000028560278,0.00020508173,0.00093954214,0.00092739257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990601,0.00012214185,0.000027095499,0.000050803043,0.0006018997,0.00013785211],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096361845,0.00057833974,0.000276175,0.0018984646,0.012371672,0.007375545,0.0012640993,0.0033039656,0.025004843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002952207,0.0003726274,0.0003574844,0.0027928771,0.007917844,0.0016434165,0.0011380912,0.0033970466,0.0026224349],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050378085,0.0000029327268,0.00020927198,0.00002473803,0.0000011294879,0.000035813107,0.0007419753,0.000103198174,0.000057186844,0.89118654,0.10016491,0.0074672042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060670945,0.000004021429,0.0022167307,0.00012515203,0.0000064365113,0.000038218535,0.00084476947,0.00016904867,0.00010157464,0.040927622,0.95554334,0.000017178245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97724736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99079484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061066512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061066512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09940632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4430706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7125696412","doi":"10.1515/9781773855196-026","title":"3.9 “Decision-Making in the Supreme Court of Canada”","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Remand (court procedure); Legislation; Work (physics); Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.02675118559818748,"score_gpt":0.23081560994488015,"score_spread":0.20406442434669267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7125696412","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007994409,0.007989843,0.0021152955,0.03781754,0.0005781082,0.000069693364,0.0005980918,0.000040234227,0.9427967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43441027,0.0045180144,0.0026419677,0.019556606,0.0003590546,0.00009219605,0.00036269592,0.000088246765,0.5379709],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99620515,0.0005010922,0.00005418835,0.00027917177,0.0014719199,0.0014885478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985241,0.00029000329,0.000039053415,0.000059745253,0.00091308606,0.00017404454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018495339,0.0005924953,0.00036242162,0.0013284594,0.015577979,0.008725412,0.0022400867,0.0061527994,0.016769852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005535863,0.00047033274,0.0006284605,0.0019968706,0.009620972,0.001971572,0.0013588946,0.0049671354,0.0017225253],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000100375855,0.000007875293,0.0003397843,0.000021030122,0.0000043778464,0.00009188278,0.0010256469,0.0003272567,0.00006973488,0.89616126,0.09644679,0.005494248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024500141,0.0000106795715,0.0039854753,0.00032744175,0.000025558393,0.00008066444,0.0026769172,0.0014697541,0.0004725916,0.2281708,0.7627025,0.00005319658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9739502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9885466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.071438804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.071438804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09983685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51832724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7125709415","doi":"10.1515/9781773855196-044","title":"5.8 The Challenge of Judging Supreme Court of Canada Judges","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Legislation; Government (linguistics); State supreme court; Task (project management)","score_opus":0.02978012352325642,"score_gpt":0.2108701014347721,"score_spread":0.18108997791151568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7125709415","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009561275,0.008301741,0.0019637868,0.08059528,0.0009062661,0.000058383586,0.0002850143,0.000040735777,0.89828753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4961052,0.0047485293,0.0034730993,0.03626825,0.0007871915,0.00010433651,0.0001687343,0.00010194998,0.45824265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994615,0.0010162065,0.00008281354,0.00033080744,0.0020803513,0.0018748364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964514,0.0011251386,0.000087248016,0.00011728072,0.0018016257,0.00041733484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030816756,0.00046018237,0.00046322643,0.0018531184,0.016549964,0.010523737,0.002112816,0.009938652,0.010248922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011436067,0.00047387125,0.00045199346,0.001839587,0.010466617,0.0023532878,0.0014733613,0.006793869,0.0014666497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010065197,0.0000067481797,0.0005077788,0.000023718687,0.0000053876965,0.00010232328,0.001564879,0.00021441141,0.000082461396,0.8881071,0.10280629,0.0065688435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003083284,0.000016303737,0.0054701488,0.00048620268,0.000032210606,0.00008091609,0.0043987883,0.0015052501,0.00047172717,0.30885532,0.6785883,0.00006398524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9271279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9766936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0728721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048836816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07573631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3543375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7126002104","doi":"","title":"Public Perceptions of Provincial Human Rights Systems in Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University Library (University of Saskatchewan)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Tribunal; Jurisdiction; Adjudication; Stakeholder; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.012037045820254028,"score_gpt":0.19385557001971362,"score_spread":0.1818185241994596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7126002104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9823339,0.00013810545,0.00017667864,0.0014838682,0.000009403734,0.000054008135,0.00011450545,0.00001139257,0.01567814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973883,0.00015354963,0.00014742381,0.00019916121,0.0000014152279,0.000013550106,0.0000577261,0.0000036927318,0.0020351673],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966865,0.0005552177,0.000092389106,0.00017294203,0.0013581128,0.0011347815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938294,0.0009879095,0.0005554904,0.00014299627,0.0028270201,0.001657154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024676847,0.00019286308,0.00022307155,0.0013858053,0.010323085,0.004695746,0.0010225129,0.00048999186,0.0034154672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051559065,0.00028819402,0.00022137733,0.0028017464,0.0063792383,0.0008305534,0.0022503596,0.0008875415,0.00015917941],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034375594,0.00022684505,0.6631206,0.00028794864,0.00009512678,0.0015239632,0.24067312,0.0020448947,0.007898364,0.01512255,0.006572489,0.062090322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020226498,0.00009385269,0.5432099,0.00015345721,0.000027591086,0.00014517692,0.43329498,0.0009600694,0.00064308284,0.00090698997,0.020467563,0.000077162615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9891149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99562365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.080221064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.080221064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09735637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5820473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7127953218","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i4.2615","title":"Do Pre-1970 Precedents Still Matter?","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Appeal; Assertion; Economic Justice; Relevance (law); Judicial opinion","score_opus":0.023953914497859267,"score_gpt":0.31364878628662035,"score_spread":0.2896948717887611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7127953218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6942321,0.046390165,0.0017551719,0.032163646,0.00077763974,0.00008858944,0.0042608846,0.00009210904,0.22023967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97513187,0.01097525,0.0005066789,0.001801111,0.00024610406,0.000018362169,0.0009705383,0.000044681667,0.010305397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994103,0.00042166788,0.00026247403,0.00079829094,0.0031550084,0.0012595841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9656016,0.013671072,0.003781135,0.0009355285,0.013146596,0.0028641084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054367245,0.00021378437,0.00050435105,0.010147057,0.007003487,0.009623431,0.001502734,0.0011986421,0.0087734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03669277,0.00022430043,0.00027583845,0.022699164,0.0073980014,0.0048609776,0.0015754154,0.0021012332,0.00077011815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025583277,0.00012550992,0.2980774,0.0015354153,0.00020448458,0.0017547389,0.0918044,0.0011163158,0.0019757624,0.35627174,0.03802422,0.20885418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017268423,0.00003666311,0.56078124,0.0013435716,0.00013284979,0.00034613378,0.035878755,0.00035118818,0.0011753872,0.019054942,0.3807758,0.00010617599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8879616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94628924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8879616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04486241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05407211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32550102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128539874","doi":"10.64903/1480-6800-25.2.169","title":"Legal and Constitutional Guarantees for Applying the Principle of Legitimate Expectation: An Applied Study in the Emirati, Egyptian, and Iraqi Constitutions","year":2022,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Arab world geographer","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Judicial review; Appeal; Jurisdiction; Legislature; Administrative law; Action (physics); Legal certainty; Legal research","score_opus":0.03309033554805505,"score_gpt":0.31032265576704066,"score_spread":0.2772323202189856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128539874","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58286095,0.008651708,0.010140757,0.008337531,0.00012043319,0.0001887675,0.00011898084,0.000020591195,0.38956034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904614,0.00237952,0.0019157435,0.00025686296,0.00007112544,0.00004011561,0.00002472736,0.000006530283,0.004843867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823606,0.0009570145,0.00010604804,0.000115870076,0.0003661015,0.00021880316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99250376,0.0060239877,0.00048310898,0.00023734292,0.0006461175,0.00010566717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043243533,0.0001917137,0.00030087956,0.002896252,0.0033561955,0.004293148,0.00068430236,0.0015804726,0.004134412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010978122,0.00022091178,0.00035862412,0.0035102104,0.01311458,0.0030724471,0.0016828176,0.002165493,0.00020300942],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012567556,0.00003297182,0.0021037676,0.00008693797,0.0000073325627,0.00038489746,0.0075206268,0.0006360928,0.00020840384,0.9761287,0.00054414023,0.0123335505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057052668,0.00018313265,0.06625391,0.0013111343,0.0001044217,0.0009915875,0.06400681,0.011407288,0.0016792341,0.6758408,0.17805722,0.00010746129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013607472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012620873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013607472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005456156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002833078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03958732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132875535","doi":"","title":"The Reasonable Justice: An Empirical Analysis of Frank Iacobucci&apos;s Career on the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Economic Justice; Voting; Warren Court; Criminal justice; Position (finance); Roberts Court; Court of record","score_opus":0.07153925953025932,"score_gpt":0.3891530065442806,"score_spread":0.3176137470140213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132875535","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94116414,0.0018253739,0.00015277912,0.011450464,0.000112256086,0.00015524097,0.0011200355,0.0000139307085,0.044005692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98915803,0.00085204444,0.0000901816,0.0012064312,0.00004055247,0.000031252297,0.0005536898,0.00002533414,0.008042518],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98584765,0.0016720828,0.00036567455,0.0014127573,0.0052329907,0.005468817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93783915,0.014783567,0.007392658,0.0012144967,0.021540135,0.01723009],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006638135,0.0003534337,0.0012591442,0.0063712485,0.034994476,0.011796378,0.0047195046,0.0034728239,0.011299415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053866476,0.0005424977,0.00050547655,0.012295302,0.010739452,0.0033514139,0.0050972835,0.007969275,0.00094072375],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002832352,0.0007102887,0.60522276,0.00020003734,0.000088833694,0.0012477463,0.27794454,0.00046347576,0.00026630622,0.037765775,0.051638953,0.024168028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002679013,0.00007205321,0.5684495,0.000572041,0.000040912964,0.00016071428,0.38663998,0.0011547346,0.000110221496,0.0013065006,0.041361745,0.00010481231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9925135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99631786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10539745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10539745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12293688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76471555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132938793","doi":"","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada&apos;s Multifactorial Approach to Deference in Judicial Review","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Supreme court; CLARITY; Judicial deference; Judicial review; Standard of review; Judicial activism; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy)","score_opus":0.08033757918172237,"score_gpt":0.3688370930469751,"score_spread":0.28849951386525274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132938793","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056655526,0.022710247,0.056793705,0.46673724,0.0013038865,0.00029027768,0.00033143462,0.00011017791,0.3950675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94734937,0.003759418,0.012900953,0.018545039,0.0005466612,0.00008416405,0.000031548883,0.000024174606,0.016758665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96912384,0.010271748,0.00084458326,0.0018155861,0.013941892,0.0040023043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.973566,0.013357793,0.0015204917,0.0012468536,0.008392406,0.0019164836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019284336,0.0003734003,0.0005035542,0.004108831,0.015067645,0.010785102,0.0020235481,0.0054007675,0.0018532358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037660584,0.0004165473,0.0005491755,0.003744275,0.03651676,0.0035592553,0.0036221414,0.007945004,0.00013444232],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027509318,0.0000038346047,0.00037563476,0.000017521083,0.000004003743,0.000028489721,0.0010270164,0.00021281511,0.000044367236,0.99158704,0.002902748,0.0037938596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037005117,0.00003701211,0.006649802,0.00037299676,0.000034366676,0.00013982858,0.0018093298,0.0029210073,0.00031305006,0.86417115,0.12343241,0.00008205084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7819873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.867795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21801269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.091397665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13599838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6631396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132945733","doi":"","title":"Narrating the Constitution: Exploring the Role of Narrative in Constitution-Making in Divided Societies","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Polity; Identity (music); Storytelling; Politics; Focus (optics); Mechanism (biology); Perception; Affect (linguistics)","score_opus":0.049697444262072024,"score_gpt":0.36855099620660714,"score_spread":0.31885355194453513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132945733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78339964,0.0028346048,0.010563591,0.015509455,0.00017048957,0.00008930199,0.000057781886,0.00002025451,0.18735497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99595696,0.0006142566,0.0008010553,0.00022420549,0.000021161244,0.000025164443,0.00001615034,0.000009394321,0.0023316494],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963415,0.003153169,0.000043370965,0.0001272982,0.00016264462,0.00017204664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915563,0.007095326,0.00061327824,0.00025370935,0.00019278673,0.00028858145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048173615,0.00031025417,0.00024463225,0.001204883,0.0074722692,0.009258486,0.00089754374,0.0016873756,0.0033264726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011164273,0.00020911763,0.00025305597,0.001184689,0.024386033,0.012048307,0.0048762737,0.0030600373,0.00028099673],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024891498,0.00003937853,0.0017644793,0.00007900143,0.000005853688,0.0003444908,0.71898514,0.00018445041,0.00027253508,0.272182,0.00076175435,0.005356068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002307112,0.000050870076,0.0031491807,0.00030678685,0.000015330588,0.00023657676,0.83053315,0.00083341514,0.00058947015,0.10784036,0.05640318,0.000018546087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034727084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004264904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009258486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034466574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016777097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025476992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133006774","doi":"","title":"Legal Positivism and the Rule of Law: The Hartian Response to Fuller&apos;s Challenge","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Legal positivism; Conformity; Legal formalism; Perspective (graphical); Rule of law","score_opus":0.032510735301600466,"score_gpt":0.3631583644944972,"score_spread":0.3306476291928967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133006774","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0858655,0.018124448,0.025781084,0.58372295,0.0022838358,0.000036706817,0.00007564402,0.0000790851,0.28403065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95166206,0.003909956,0.002999928,0.027593153,0.0014740631,0.00004017832,0.00002099883,0.000047513327,0.012252201],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901884,0.0054190666,0.00020178004,0.00069288415,0.002726106,0.00077181676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9813762,0.014784232,0.0009266685,0.0007406963,0.0015114831,0.0006606998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010409911,0.0002378978,0.00047218785,0.0015702156,0.005493092,0.009000243,0.0013522485,0.00593074,0.0028773725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016351191,0.00033905782,0.00043325467,0.0011773563,0.04818125,0.010679062,0.0041188193,0.008026792,0.00026873176],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028586503,0.0000057134007,0.00006337867,0.000008810638,0.0000011380885,0.00002120831,0.0015515977,0.00010420874,0.000012818438,0.9940844,0.0027072956,0.0014365447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013574475,0.000011177257,0.00025065875,0.00007149942,0.000002534362,0.00003658899,0.0020314166,0.00045993255,0.00008658908,0.93564534,0.06137522,0.000015411999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020176709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013823821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020176709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0128617855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060172295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09331924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133026269","doi":"","title":"Of social and economic rights and neo-liberal constitutions","year":2003,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social rights; Constitution; Politics; Interpretation (philosophy); Human rights; Right to property; International human rights law; Social change","score_opus":0.023266089192543266,"score_gpt":0.3447974043814293,"score_spread":0.32153131518888606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133026269","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033774927,0.0027782887,0.021845108,0.02728664,0.0002910847,0.000055219596,0.000074528936,0.000018049925,0.9138761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9600287,0.0013838584,0.0034288997,0.002233118,0.00034818126,0.00014460058,0.00004404092,0.000019919635,0.032368768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99461657,0.0027906375,0.00013954238,0.0005411246,0.0011428149,0.0007692579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99419576,0.0037185042,0.00048146013,0.0007825071,0.00059112156,0.00023072373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008435395,0.00031545825,0.00032418204,0.0016828529,0.004712014,0.0072430386,0.0008984867,0.0021807472,0.005885416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010870099,0.00024083268,0.0004362589,0.0013666566,0.04923972,0.0071573644,0.0045971572,0.004622551,0.00041946533],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.7976048e-7,6.88282e-7,0.000009477656,0.0000010160727,1.7156958e-7,0.0000019663262,0.00012909512,0.000017104563,0.00000346203,0.99960023,0.000070628405,0.0001656939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042465886,0.000001694318,0.000071792936,0.000015695703,8.71618e-7,0.0000057186994,0.00022840152,0.00009360269,0.0000244221,0.9862037,0.013348513,0.0000013690864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068579847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074460213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008435395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007213117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00549292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052335083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133051978","doi":"","title":"The Rule of Precedent in the United Kingdom, the United States of America and Canada: A Comparative Analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"IRIS","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Legislation; State (computer science); Legislature; Constitution","score_opus":0.043321754594418775,"score_gpt":0.34318086464118397,"score_spread":0.2998591100467652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133051978","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5596319,0.0085786395,0.0005672109,0.0105363,0.000087047505,0.000059912858,0.0013477181,0.000036893085,0.41915438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878583,0.0014017985,0.00019885751,0.000422014,0.00001288338,0.000010333759,0.00017612978,0.000016614396,0.009903196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933855,0.00093441695,0.00018246808,0.00037519852,0.0022045744,0.0029178485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.979451,0.007373968,0.0013784862,0.0004992244,0.009835187,0.0014622384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038161885,0.00016725213,0.0010310786,0.0060158097,0.015887564,0.012792849,0.0021332805,0.0019638678,0.008912373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024869349,0.00034734517,0.00051314733,0.016990772,0.009939398,0.0023099158,0.001793197,0.0030559856,0.000458072],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025215268,0.00008381008,0.03724187,0.0002061719,0.00009888369,0.00047599163,0.026062487,0.0025639003,0.00025710437,0.88837236,0.021017615,0.023367664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019693961,0.0001388401,0.5071478,0.0012731388,0.00070913875,0.0003158412,0.14933214,0.0054825805,0.0010041606,0.07514254,0.2589751,0.0002817752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99303436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9959186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.104454346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.104454346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11639086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7578729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133818692","doi":"10.1080/07078552.2025.2598507","title":"Authoritarian Liberalism in an Age of Crisis: The Contradictions of European Political and Constitutional Development","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Political Economy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Politics; Liberalism; Democracy; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.06879537166254843,"score_gpt":0.3639715082747617,"score_spread":0.2951761366122133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133818692","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22507355,0.023067392,0.012206779,0.25375983,0.00090698915,0.00004013687,0.00008240281,0.00007101399,0.48479187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98787886,0.0019087951,0.00065649976,0.005464439,0.00028033557,0.000022357877,0.000014878624,0.000029229555,0.0037447065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98904335,0.006730408,0.0003556773,0.0008576194,0.0017285175,0.0012844676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98692745,0.008570574,0.0010813541,0.0011438614,0.001450048,0.00082669675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01728874,0.00022368152,0.00053930766,0.0022215256,0.0056969547,0.017692814,0.00088011846,0.0045653423,0.0018423848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022385856,0.00029850606,0.00028192007,0.0024008,0.04471083,0.013012405,0.0054809093,0.006966088,0.00018393727],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007977203,0.000006115733,0.00013143463,0.000012440024,0.0000019936238,0.00003295843,0.0074574267,0.00008118315,0.000029217626,0.98691654,0.0017936568,0.0035289973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016592392,0.0000115769735,0.0012544906,0.00013088819,0.0000027806022,0.000096353,0.009553716,0.00031119538,0.00010834985,0.8847864,0.10370892,0.00001860519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042373096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031804573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017692814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007683593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004791705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09143269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7134698153","doi":"","title":"Foreword","year":2012,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Digital USD (University of San Diego)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International law; State (computer science); Deportation; International relations","score_opus":0.027163216265302194,"score_gpt":0.22451378786529963,"score_spread":0.19735057159999744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7134698153","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00049248367,0.0099641485,0.001334541,0.059484977,0.27062696,0.0002630204,0.0030251108,0.00090593344,0.6539028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003204799,0.005694555,0.0005920903,0.022270333,0.04983759,0.00014211636,0.0025185745,0.00062399404,0.91511595],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989912,0.00012005602,0.0000765001,0.00015056302,0.00056589703,0.0000958203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99501723,0.00086041325,0.00020614815,0.0002771657,0.0029537485,0.00068525673],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008274312,0.00079476525,0.0008177855,0.0022970855,0.0022197806,0.0051920377,0.0012340994,0.002466401,0.49680582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007887998,0.0003097925,0.00051982835,0.0016717319,0.00068044534,0.0031789232,0.0016728688,0.0035549542,0.49642527],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007215398,0.000005630108,0.000023144985,0.00004433282,6.400843e-7,0.00001375435,0.000016715072,0.000007143629,0.00003725238,0.0011818269,0.9842762,0.014386317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022810548,0.000006748926,0.0000869012,0.00008616739,9.3498494e-7,0.00003422811,0.000047126043,0.000009310649,0.000033441756,0.00069602195,0.9989943,0.0000024729184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022170804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031258261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5031942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014635761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020941652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135384508","doi":"10.1093/law-mpeipro/e2414.013.2414/law-mpeipro-e2414?rskey=se8tir&result=3&prd=opil","title":"Sociological Approaches to International Adjudication","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Economic Justice; Adjudication; Politics; Sociological theory; Sociology of law; International law; European Union law","score_opus":0.2392785651360453,"score_gpt":0.32320491627332193,"score_spread":0.08392635113727662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135384508","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017213874,0.012074127,0.08658981,0.026221758,0.0010122387,0.00008154946,0.00007213555,0.000068347195,0.8566662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93502367,0.007881911,0.020219423,0.0041710474,0.0022545073,0.00029014127,0.000097842916,0.00010028086,0.029961275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9828373,0.010827393,0.0006721317,0.0012658602,0.0030791834,0.0013180574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896729,0.0070849364,0.0008276966,0.001015424,0.0011021404,0.0002968609],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010244467,0.0006386827,0.0004771227,0.0056544472,0.0100009,0.012722528,0.0019464977,0.0032498767,0.00487338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01418647,0.0003983484,0.00056127034,0.005086435,0.055600155,0.007400779,0.005408554,0.0057370747,0.0004143094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.2695337e-7,0.0000013627944,0.00002082923,0.0000037674456,3.7841912e-7,0.0000047270855,0.00061490753,0.00004815492,0.0000036653428,0.9984806,0.00017975905,0.00064149214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032872545,0.000006911602,0.00019083483,0.00008821231,0.0000031949462,0.000039391285,0.0026083472,0.00047313428,0.000060289334,0.9325524,0.06396569,0.000008347485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00837239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077270297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012722528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011867354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007447643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.086104095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135449662","doi":"","title":"Why do autocrats place judicial constraints on their power? A comparative analysis of high courts in autocracies","year":2012,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Autocracy; Opposition (politics); Politics; Elite; Dissent; Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.06614925940693328,"score_gpt":0.32934524650720015,"score_spread":0.26319598710026687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135449662","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98517215,0.00056845456,0.00026431232,0.00028980843,0.0000044805447,0.000009017279,0.000036041776,0.0000027699875,0.0136531005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99951637,0.00008172249,0.000042118358,0.000017686036,0.0000029313658,0.0000012773536,0.000012553855,0.000001825002,0.000323533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99447507,0.0020596737,0.00025058145,0.0006516939,0.0010157786,0.0015472211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98228055,0.009023889,0.0042580855,0.001521234,0.0018808359,0.0010353945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040689376,0.0001062035,0.0005614838,0.003890339,0.0028820252,0.0045140097,0.0007195622,0.0008200637,0.004717704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015896482,0.0001980937,0.00018264679,0.005101466,0.008666411,0.002155419,0.0020900478,0.0012703564,0.0001853701],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061707955,0.0002774157,0.38055435,0.00034924416,0.00036047437,0.0030157233,0.1330304,0.0025687718,0.003536261,0.38569155,0.0023372376,0.087661505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007279792,0.000357018,0.8285844,0.00033497997,0.00015166745,0.0008469196,0.117414616,0.0014073907,0.0013341705,0.021262174,0.028164798,0.00006909644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025420224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061599065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025420224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038530529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022903974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0505445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135503727","doi":"","title":"The silence of Justice Thomas during the hearings before the US Supreme Court","year":2012,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Silence; Economic Justice; State supreme court; Supreme Court Decisions","score_opus":0.04568033385130896,"score_gpt":0.29152958735399076,"score_spread":0.2458492535026818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135503727","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37893194,0.0064617563,0.0018165536,0.4271315,0.0052620247,0.00005624698,0.00022721097,0.0000796706,0.18003309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93117,0.0006152735,0.00016133298,0.045079216,0.00068016874,0.000028125878,0.00002397628,0.00009569563,0.022146307],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98330736,0.0066281585,0.00038904016,0.0013051213,0.0026653765,0.0057049436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97466725,0.02046196,0.0010018774,0.0005704672,0.0014052684,0.0018931092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008386958,0.00045687583,0.00078598945,0.0011829518,0.037280265,0.016316462,0.0015362354,0.019053385,0.00412409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04620344,0.0008988544,0.0005998599,0.0014533203,0.018633623,0.005700394,0.0065688435,0.02780432,0.0008039928],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002448659,0.000043714634,0.0012845757,0.000082229424,0.000045967292,0.0030537648,0.5974343,0.00020634655,0.00261831,0.28135005,0.10136811,0.012267866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036983147,0.000088133216,0.009073056,0.00057676306,0.00011048176,0.0007176324,0.39189953,0.00030082045,0.005455738,0.05011484,0.5414059,0.00022010026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1400685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24599995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1400685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015983725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016367089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2785064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135560134","doi":"","title":"The nomination of Justice Kagan to the US Supreme","year":2010,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.04505392842163939,"score_gpt":0.30293284236251766,"score_spread":0.25787891394087825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135560134","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21857853,0.0026287157,0.0014275757,0.13389644,0.003769239,0.000045806166,0.0001859649,0.00003934826,0.6394283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93506736,0.00034446124,0.0002528826,0.023421355,0.00029099255,0.000020600199,0.00002552295,0.00003427849,0.040542483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882563,0.004233151,0.00033305903,0.0018550259,0.0018438068,0.0034786102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99153334,0.005550435,0.00039304575,0.0005422886,0.0014665017,0.00051445974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006430015,0.00026337086,0.0005267685,0.0013336036,0.018087484,0.009917761,0.0011145842,0.010370403,0.00431291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028038984,0.00043855258,0.00032811784,0.0015267063,0.011190418,0.003956548,0.004528217,0.013284384,0.00067474425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010760459,0.00001622411,0.0017047452,0.00003564775,0.000024052206,0.00049327925,0.018656207,0.00012748138,0.00045637166,0.8779041,0.09178813,0.0086862575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043360356,0.00006440822,0.013781585,0.00044788243,0.00009538482,0.00046346945,0.042240266,0.00046574493,0.0034161762,0.20803958,0.7307804,0.00016170419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057190977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15384893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057190977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00735738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009204072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.113716185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135588661","doi":"","title":"Legal Authority Beyond the State","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.05274277215760445,"score_gpt":0.3052479228125902,"score_spread":0.2525051506549858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135588661","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044077253,0.010605001,0.0016876424,0.01039297,0.00039851593,0.000012740767,0.00005237726,0.000018840301,0.97242427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6641972,0.005720007,0.0012175367,0.0040307343,0.0010769643,0.00006091731,0.000121938254,0.00009838708,0.3234763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99697065,0.0012791879,0.00008656759,0.00053679245,0.00066287856,0.0004638959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853504,0.00080770213,0.000074867516,0.00025906594,0.00020019313,0.00012308102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021635096,0.00046430266,0.00048278368,0.0012775856,0.0051555326,0.01120731,0.0008538394,0.0042250925,0.013936052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005519059,0.00040076522,0.00031895962,0.0013159956,0.025862632,0.0064441417,0.0025940298,0.005240109,0.0020620143],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001907976,0.0000029478015,0.000015315272,0.0000060840985,6.584727e-7,0.000005430282,0.0006254167,0.00002718307,0.000012971897,0.9952567,0.0029071625,0.0011380813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061843543,0.00000561759,0.00015369461,0.000097246375,0.0000040655304,0.000022571281,0.0007991858,0.00008828237,0.00006691517,0.8325846,0.16616687,0.0000047219482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01334996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0147262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013936052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068861544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007163382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04996276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135745482","doi":"","title":"Independence of the Courts","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.06818915865121235,"score_gpt":0.2871526660988174,"score_spread":0.21896350744760507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135745482","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0060241506,0.0023162714,0.0020560236,0.0062764944,0.00029714097,0.000025686815,0.00013077728,0.000015119234,0.9828583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6180836,0.0017681608,0.0018212356,0.006386716,0.0006952936,0.00011757564,0.00026957106,0.000101673315,0.37075624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99261636,0.0020061487,0.00021055409,0.0016789838,0.0017216871,0.0017662984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99632204,0.0015132115,0.00018614878,0.00090555014,0.00071023137,0.00036282995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047680014,0.00047840166,0.00079743745,0.001303569,0.006257434,0.010035585,0.0015441432,0.005957055,0.02289609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013209601,0.00070205197,0.000736143,0.0010076492,0.013969319,0.0051798723,0.004214137,0.009139626,0.0033358573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009190159,0.000005808379,0.000055423534,0.000008479582,0.000003338921,0.000011730819,0.000357164,0.000036969046,0.000029789579,0.9929852,0.0047020325,0.0017949565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036670983,0.000013818111,0.0010333519,0.00012578757,0.000028827035,0.000063634885,0.0007579757,0.0001685082,0.00031052277,0.7667859,0.23065898,0.000016058255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016972823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021701513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02289609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005929436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009200068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07659501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135746788","doi":"","title":"From Hamdi to Kadi: Comparing the role of the American and European judiciaries in times of emergencies","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Field (mathematics); Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.042750009631830815,"score_gpt":0.27033394473128725,"score_spread":0.22758393509945643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135746788","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20771085,0.045299362,0.00068135746,0.06821594,0.0016624493,0.000030219935,0.00022615636,0.000021363192,0.6761523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97087944,0.0054391166,0.0003350356,0.0059516914,0.00022383365,0.000019438261,0.000060645158,0.000028449413,0.01706225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982646,0.00080578716,0.00005316542,0.00011336311,0.00030539665,0.00045766946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99674547,0.0021909866,0.00028911675,0.000094486466,0.00035547552,0.00032440366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032988521,0.00034452524,0.00031830862,0.0018688287,0.005376754,0.009528347,0.0009765052,0.0027270943,0.008197988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009281236,0.00021557418,0.00021309327,0.0037702734,0.009082677,0.008296383,0.0028537388,0.0049023717,0.0006308228],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034914358,0.000073083764,0.0069280094,0.00025125445,0.000025225609,0.0004829964,0.2053819,0.00022521755,0.00028419629,0.6661357,0.053127024,0.06673626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060314655,0.0000934742,0.04293421,0.0010687908,0.00006173967,0.00037055026,0.5025216,0.00030166275,0.00050120364,0.09491846,0.35709918,0.000068834874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018324165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05306475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018324165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077005574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006609852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055871725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135806346","doi":"","title":"The Constitutional Reform: The Judicial Power","year":2018,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.047085588228889474,"score_gpt":0.3155549407419681,"score_spread":0.26846935251307863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135806346","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09986671,0.028753053,0.01086872,0.31499052,0.00130635,0.000053517302,0.00018788445,0.00004359095,0.54392964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98574394,0.0015924018,0.0007710935,0.0040973895,0.0006688651,0.000022822505,0.000019495952,0.000028415043,0.0070555275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9769189,0.014212091,0.0005362625,0.0021416119,0.003870744,0.0023204428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96557695,0.026268285,0.0016910607,0.0031917775,0.0020663734,0.0012056325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018500341,0.00032192538,0.00092141476,0.0023752858,0.005546891,0.012377097,0.0016749254,0.0077468194,0.006815293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049834657,0.000588318,0.00041459562,0.0021020393,0.058821972,0.011898697,0.004244716,0.00850541,0.00040114456],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000084293715,0.000007297351,0.000097053635,0.000015048018,0.000003171447,0.0000110696055,0.0008395368,0.00007842026,0.00003119286,0.9964036,0.001095188,0.0014101014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050974097,0.0000117755535,0.0010476985,0.00010295656,0.000016472515,0.000026617725,0.0018093237,0.00034307074,0.00016332226,0.9572624,0.039149385,0.000016032767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010583738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011289777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018500341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009092419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011513765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09784031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7139352817","doi":"","title":"Friendly Precedent","year":2016,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Politics; Construct (python library); Political question; Test (biology); Supreme Court Decisions","score_opus":0.025557573694982412,"score_gpt":0.29324026196327563,"score_spread":0.2676826882682932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7139352817","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41296178,0.006972958,0.026807701,0.009547784,0.0009423032,0.0003232092,0.003690593,0.00021439214,0.5385393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96680343,0.0011507178,0.0055215154,0.0019704455,0.00045405014,0.00008452253,0.0011262961,0.00006230958,0.022826739],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922678,0.002108079,0.0004906975,0.0012858562,0.0027261688,0.0011214544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9711593,0.014835795,0.0063911765,0.0020242652,0.003678484,0.0019109822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048260447,0.00022336484,0.00042680552,0.0046826825,0.005048812,0.0031888902,0.00077485177,0.0014144212,0.022672143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042978503,0.00029217787,0.00031755603,0.0061961194,0.0022031215,0.0036380552,0.0019849243,0.0019921968,0.0033447295],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024761504,0.00021302617,0.15355289,0.0007155173,0.00010217194,0.0030359558,0.019258762,0.0023149766,0.0027381158,0.57875776,0.06114335,0.17791986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000730541,0.00025764285,0.19101901,0.0009992166,0.0000873963,0.0020817975,0.011837511,0.002380892,0.0019721636,0.16942975,0.6197321,0.0001294334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009538532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028585492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022672143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022231669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021779267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0758459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7139597567","doi":"","title":"The conceptual origins of contemporary common law constitutionalism : the influence of classical common law jurisprudence on Wilfrid Waluchow’s theory of law","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"theses.fr (ABES)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Common law; Jurisprudence; Common sense; Order (exchange); Philosophy of law; Positive law","score_opus":0.05782579194331849,"score_gpt":0.3235325131863329,"score_spread":0.2657067212430144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7139597567","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15236022,0.04495063,0.07235057,0.16345797,0.0013409076,0.00008297362,0.0001376241,0.00009209734,0.565227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9700992,0.0060803373,0.004930315,0.0032020216,0.000640886,0.000074785,0.000028397395,0.000053525033,0.014890471],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99507165,0.0028256152,0.00010268679,0.00064348336,0.0009487177,0.00040784111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99424887,0.004208535,0.00040212617,0.00042973587,0.0004379002,0.00027280647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071427682,0.00041508817,0.00059468334,0.0036098217,0.005290134,0.010161285,0.0016703136,0.0032877845,0.0029736354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007966486,0.0004177387,0.0006142901,0.0030689512,0.053623643,0.010665041,0.0038186237,0.0050009913,0.00031859434],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018113311,0.000002401341,0.000037276302,0.000004522456,6.2899466e-7,0.0000084098465,0.0013983587,0.000057664784,0.000009079763,0.9974935,0.00028539047,0.0007009426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007792046,0.0000060983525,0.00022226697,0.00005483673,0.0000029872656,0.000016819122,0.0012671434,0.00036191018,0.00006330368,0.9740251,0.023963502,0.000008224188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016793376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015347332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016793376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016509352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007332646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.119784296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7139629214","doi":"","title":"The influence of the American Supreme Court and the Canadian Supreme Court on the jurisprudence of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal","year":2022,"lang":"pl","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Jagiellonian University Repository (Jagiellonian University)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Tribunal; Constitutional court; Original jurisdiction; Remand (court procedure)","score_opus":0.011198779958637241,"score_gpt":0.19534837796101326,"score_spread":0.184149598002376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7139629214","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.093018554,0.009345534,0.00095943065,0.019878272,0.00020829061,0.000043248616,0.00014682957,0.000020602176,0.8763792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9515893,0.0031364625,0.00051765156,0.0023045505,0.000115220275,0.00003348014,0.000036113528,0.000057471003,0.042209703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99495065,0.0010228158,0.000088188084,0.00041955104,0.001569023,0.0019497403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956318,0.002507417,0.00016654415,0.00017832562,0.0010194188,0.0004965313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036680435,0.0004399052,0.0007106795,0.003122072,0.01524961,0.014640325,0.00180592,0.0032403092,0.007353508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012284598,0.000685823,0.00042431636,0.003943028,0.024637666,0.0041984445,0.0032055017,0.0061265803,0.00049144425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003399526,0.000012408928,0.00047979492,0.000021099806,0.000011855112,0.00007474683,0.0036099993,0.00027910093,0.00016710472,0.98477453,0.0048644976,0.0056708693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015552813,0.00006890116,0.049074568,0.0006086981,0.00029923106,0.00016543634,0.026460782,0.0041226754,0.0010406389,0.59627515,0.32149678,0.00023167017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93223554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9714987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08916756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08916756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10015249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64695895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7139845950","doi":"","title":"<em>The Transformation of the Supreme Court of Canada: An Empirical Examination</em>","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Transformation (genetics); Empirical research; Government (linguistics); Interpretation (philosophy)","score_opus":0.03502382704005529,"score_gpt":0.236990549721148,"score_spread":0.2019667226810927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7139845950","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75318724,0.002489288,0.00041457108,0.05179036,0.0001287088,0.00014835993,0.0013181991,0.000031417785,0.19049181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900309,0.00048011306,0.00007999518,0.0025074508,0.000023036613,0.000014714089,0.00020417184,0.000011576988,0.0066479533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935422,0.00067739625,0.00012824325,0.0004382463,0.0027577658,0.0024561316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9825277,0.005323776,0.0020556767,0.00052191847,0.006698965,0.0028720014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027528075,0.00022262281,0.0005035647,0.0026239732,0.027514039,0.014045259,0.0026760485,0.0034400402,0.015133414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030495629,0.0002833812,0.00039266492,0.008013052,0.012268537,0.004644213,0.0029853499,0.0057179774,0.00080562633],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025788925,0.00048050747,0.18884486,0.0002098455,0.00012497754,0.0011878676,0.12161688,0.0020145879,0.00043535334,0.5395906,0.10597217,0.039264563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007281201,0.000068560876,0.4934311,0.00051946135,0.00013702207,0.00016345513,0.32823727,0.0020261977,0.00077941304,0.036058757,0.13837656,0.00012928416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99229914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13175946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13175946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21201038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9559863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7148194910","doi":"","title":"The Last Quarter Century of Empirical Evidence","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The World Bank Open Knowledge Repository (World Bank)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial reform; Quarter (Canadian coin); Transformative learning; Empirical evidence; Politics; Quality (philosophy); Key (lock)","score_opus":0.06457789486140265,"score_gpt":0.37442791698203387,"score_spread":0.30985002212063123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7148194910","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016533308,0.6657805,0.0043499996,0.24707273,0.0078018648,0.000093376715,0.0037770234,0.0001129547,0.05447812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20087735,0.6270753,0.007276399,0.13352835,0.017142663,0.0002144735,0.005856062,0.00025768232,0.007771673],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9830335,0.00622355,0.0017868936,0.0038511832,0.0044962103,0.0006087495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6636558,0.2723933,0.020017875,0.012040792,0.029171959,0.0027202137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020363854,0.0008211746,0.0014147176,0.0105028385,0.0015449447,0.009285263,0.0029509233,0.0039473544,0.03785078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14953431,0.0008215401,0.0010424644,0.017440042,0.009202224,0.010642199,0.0042228964,0.0056687496,0.0053353906],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054698,0.00053893944,0.052836128,0.04462982,0.0016956264,0.00064475473,0.0034944627,0.0010272395,0.0006533109,0.18496156,0.26884937,0.44012177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000908915,0.00016305408,0.03919917,0.07355889,0.0007241774,0.0007975841,0.009532314,0.00070453034,0.00078603014,0.057780292,0.8165432,0.0001198375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008786411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009055851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03785078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004440986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072457413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12662345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7148280088","doi":"10.70675/0556a608z9b5cz4010za3e0za19ca30ba15c","title":"Le recours au mode de preuve scientifique dans le contentieux constitutionnel des droits et libertés : recherche comparée sur les méthodes des juges américain et canadien","year":2017,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Consequentialism; Separation of powers","score_opus":0.26331074485399847,"score_gpt":0.40946702007552793,"score_spread":0.14615627522152946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7148280088","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3743456,0.06717197,0.12020513,0.0290877,0.002738769,0.0064619323,0.0019142376,0.0003536421,0.3977211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.804783,0.024853183,0.0939136,0.0040619285,0.00041240637,0.012806597,0.0005854278,0.0004520344,0.058131803],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.85151285,0.113886274,0.005113412,0.0076874746,0.019350208,0.0024498648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6619517,0.28008187,0.009335637,0.012552895,0.033868965,0.0022089065],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12417051,0.0010229275,0.0015305505,0.008120295,0.007598369,0.013872348,0.0026553452,0.0017853915,0.0146627175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19480795,0.0010322734,0.0018599506,0.012952872,0.01377959,0.007926519,0.008389727,0.0041746567,0.0016042887],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005051789,0.0003476815,0.040972374,0.0058743535,0.0005562683,0.00024705325,0.45746726,0.0007036003,0.0012665518,0.16658123,0.006752518,0.318726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035643388,0.0006488804,0.12856658,0.020303559,0.0011051509,0.0004062807,0.33209956,0.0019085028,0.0077728434,0.08734135,0.4190816,0.0004091813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09119492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.103947386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99240166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029084861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04076436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6566843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7148628927","doi":"10.70675/956a6814zef3bz44b8zb4d7ze90863fb35f4","title":"Aux origines conceptuelles du constitutionnalisme de common law contemporain : l’influence de la conception classique de la common law sur la théorie juridique de Wilfrid Waluchow","year":2018,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Common law; Order (exchange); Criticism; Intentionality","score_opus":0.012907999353898868,"score_gpt":0.32058155290064994,"score_spread":0.3076735535467511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7148628927","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20086336,0.028601333,0.06080585,0.09239154,0.00085486943,0.000064726184,0.000109428176,0.00006157208,0.6162473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9572006,0.006440549,0.004058513,0.0021629625,0.00035679815,0.00006642655,0.000029658453,0.000034238034,0.02965029],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99746466,0.0012981287,0.00004749585,0.00041425886,0.00054601347,0.00022945588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99693406,0.0021885305,0.0002759672,0.0001790971,0.00029548455,0.00012693928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041053807,0.00032555652,0.0004456203,0.0022105195,0.004688053,0.006992423,0.0009488558,0.0020573775,0.004271322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005377973,0.0003557985,0.0004662657,0.0020907312,0.021264276,0.006829762,0.0029080291,0.004988273,0.0004082151],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036224071,0.0000037065709,0.00018013564,0.000008685726,0.000001264638,0.000016135962,0.0047965557,0.000075495474,0.000029060777,0.99282575,0.00045404653,0.0016057123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001945759,0.000019780935,0.0019091113,0.00019280199,0.000014212985,0.00007180504,0.0064337333,0.0009176209,0.00030942235,0.8949674,0.09511458,0.000030211582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026914202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025209341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026914202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009212686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004742467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06684303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7152002040","doi":"10.70675/e3c8a954z353fz41b9zb86az2591f2555fcc","title":"L'obligation comportementale des juges constitutionnels","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Constitution","score_opus":0.03993840421619321,"score_gpt":0.3499738124907631,"score_spread":0.3100354082745699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7152002040","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3159184,0.0046385867,0.043699678,0.01458417,0.0003041617,0.00021043867,0.00032543775,0.00009217737,0.620227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94645524,0.0017668564,0.009060377,0.0010594685,0.00011457066,0.00016858504,0.00014724217,0.000047174934,0.041180473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99000937,0.004550484,0.00031871782,0.001018476,0.0028095208,0.0012933512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906528,0.004610571,0.0012365652,0.00089196366,0.001655179,0.00095294166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00701323,0.00026564355,0.00041422766,0.000851263,0.0037349178,0.0070714853,0.00079171633,0.0014539029,0.011369714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015053908,0.00022202544,0.00043404568,0.0010173343,0.0063167945,0.004412195,0.003200018,0.0023001563,0.0012287626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004906562,0.00008025619,0.011182502,0.00018929917,0.000026086851,0.00038988632,0.034778718,0.00089046295,0.0011360415,0.90503377,0.0038673952,0.04237641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040584877,0.00016464613,0.06701693,0.0010188544,0.00006173641,0.0010927294,0.038616538,0.0024596672,0.0018880005,0.30150527,0.586004,0.00013105856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020197531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023064727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020197531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057244087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012086702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04153371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W71561623","doi":"","title":"A strategic approach to judicial legitimacy: Supreme Court of Canada and the Marshall Case","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Legitimacy; Political science; Law; Judicial activism; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03383723725556665,"score_gpt":0.2559929142548845,"score_spread":0.22215567699931787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W71561623","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16305916,0.0050454023,0.0037359253,0.12446581,0.00026082792,0.00008893306,0.00024749446,0.00004539645,0.7030511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818954,0.00083502685,0.00048478338,0.0027127888,0.00009848023,0.000026778727,0.000025184852,0.000019801177,0.01390182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897209,0.001767931,0.00014103761,0.00072447467,0.0025997178,0.0050459513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98999816,0.0048733754,0.0005643284,0.00042341487,0.0025090042,0.0016315841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005739551,0.0006069246,0.001203897,0.0047888793,0.027885672,0.023026042,0.0037227345,0.012072276,0.010211792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021759188,0.00063363975,0.00069751445,0.0062525193,0.038941775,0.0067826556,0.0053566764,0.009216399,0.00041511707],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010670564,0.000011592412,0.00065181777,0.000009729131,0.0000071459385,0.00010401202,0.0023659642,0.0002721553,0.000032620177,0.99084806,0.003992544,0.0016936995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013335409,0.000018093062,0.005521326,0.00019280336,0.00010056836,0.00010045563,0.016873332,0.002205979,0.0002920022,0.90788573,0.0665687,0.00010770658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96570766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9810492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10471457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10471457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21590367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.759761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161795237","doi":"10.82308/2769","title":"The stories we tell: the supreme court of Canada and the constitution","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitutionalism; Constitution; Constitutional theory; Constitutional law; Shadow (psychology); Constitutional right; Jurisprudence; Precedent; State supreme court","score_opus":0.020071468450365636,"score_gpt":0.2854134758840515,"score_spread":0.2653420074336859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161795237","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11550301,0.027258001,0.0016755881,0.29101056,0.0015779936,0.00004293213,0.0009692853,0.00009360147,0.561869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94202983,0.008487685,0.00039883365,0.011672781,0.0002241366,0.000022496333,0.00024907192,0.000060495047,0.036854703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947925,0.0014267603,0.000052485004,0.0003403309,0.0014484085,0.0019393689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99570173,0.0017849997,0.000291591,0.00015347954,0.0011885542,0.0008796816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021962204,0.00045798466,0.00042800215,0.0018009278,0.044782545,0.021209931,0.001782115,0.0040681534,0.007901607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009629035,0.00034852748,0.00032272958,0.0043766852,0.038369745,0.008182896,0.004655324,0.007818567,0.00059221755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002861853,0.000014471111,0.0031516522,0.00008199991,0.00001306506,0.0009897999,0.26606604,0.00031073013,0.00010540591,0.5913075,0.122590706,0.015340029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010436489,0.000007402626,0.003676894,0.00038445214,0.000019810435,0.0002924833,0.31733617,0.0002763234,0.00014108987,0.055814076,0.6219745,0.00006637409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9780295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9883159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13309592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13309592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11844288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.965683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7164938860","doi":"10.1080/17153379.2023.12558305","title":"The Judicialization of Politics in Pakistan: A Comparative Study of Judicial Restraint and Its Development in India, the Us and Pakistan.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific Affairs","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Judicial restraint; Judicial activism; Judicial reform; Judicial independence","score_opus":0.03956949944153984,"score_gpt":0.3406596733863295,"score_spread":0.30109017394478965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7164938860","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96615547,0.0007703012,0.00007528057,0.001974262,0.000011608849,0.000011489621,0.00007723104,0.000002060742,0.030922364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99948335,0.00019374359,0.000007975055,0.000039573908,0.0000030754347,0.0000018467177,0.000009081025,4.1824174e-7,0.0002609615],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863786,0.00042893115,0.000048938546,0.00006434421,0.00017473215,0.00064519054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944376,0.002174425,0.0017694143,0.00014817115,0.0007872257,0.0006830911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010036262,0.00007544026,0.00015752726,0.0012319426,0.004496303,0.0032958607,0.00043511202,0.00052966876,0.0030483205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005580507,0.00014276744,0.000115979274,0.0036474112,0.0055836863,0.0012562195,0.0015796466,0.0015686144,0.00015114178],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002429595,0.00044657334,0.4308615,0.0002133632,0.000063559186,0.0020850464,0.20396969,0.00080551376,0.0011250186,0.3016481,0.0058590556,0.052679628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001887611,0.00011148281,0.83121306,0.00015351313,0.000024449293,0.0002862355,0.14043991,0.000214311,0.00034206876,0.004309926,0.022861289,0.000024866094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11882308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24235465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11882308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046422426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009671961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23626292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7165390870","doi":"10.61238/ijcl.2021.10.1.03","title":"Proportionality and Burden of Proof: Constitutional Review in India","year":2021,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Indian Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Supreme court; Burden of proof; Deference; Standard of review; Constitutional law; Judicial review; Skepticism","score_opus":0.02619840040560061,"score_gpt":0.3051970979898971,"score_spread":0.27899869758429646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7165390870","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1527266,0.09754749,0.042834703,0.22069134,0.0027745045,0.0004184521,0.00032051632,0.00018794938,0.48249844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9587895,0.011419948,0.0060626282,0.012145909,0.000943522,0.00013743901,0.000045029483,0.000036170823,0.010419722],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96283793,0.017793186,0.0032005082,0.0032075378,0.010885277,0.0020755834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91383386,0.069165796,0.004065653,0.004339106,0.0072177704,0.0013778877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026194429,0.00017321846,0.00060769875,0.003649713,0.005895564,0.014979816,0.00172811,0.0053159785,0.0018534844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07468004,0.0006326965,0.0004997603,0.003969124,0.020127034,0.007123027,0.006513137,0.0067118667,0.00023757637],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014722107,0.000007693192,0.0005786442,0.00012929416,0.000013286737,0.00023613895,0.00227325,0.0003791025,0.00022715412,0.9816036,0.003046783,0.011490185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051366813,0.000097635064,0.0070860554,0.0010384945,0.00009500415,0.0010107205,0.0030060255,0.0021999232,0.0018617042,0.6585606,0.32481638,0.00017617337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01638036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016898103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026194429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013344383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021348057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13853103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W72367525","doi":"","title":"Judicial Review of Executive Policymaking in Advanced Democracies: Beyond Rights Review","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Deference; Adjudication; Political science; Judicial deference; Rulemaking; Judicial review; Competence (human resources); Democracy; Separation of powers; Law and economics; Substantive due process; Duty; Law; Supreme court; Sociology; Constitution; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.012274806385934688,"score_gpt":0.319382867118914,"score_spread":0.3071080607329793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W72367525","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1055099,0.22007589,0.040983185,0.21285638,0.0029901925,0.00039829934,0.0001859345,0.00018455178,0.41681573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9368221,0.026151743,0.00632922,0.016998982,0.0025583836,0.00012404757,0.00006281696,0.000052007952,0.010900629],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9296184,0.047982786,0.0038313454,0.0033971139,0.011655361,0.0035149585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.69500446,0.25013906,0.014570324,0.0110174185,0.027253423,0.0020152384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07222129,0.00018869793,0.0009876343,0.0061676847,0.004399789,0.013651679,0.0016476405,0.0060781213,0.0019488076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17721209,0.0004181263,0.0005662234,0.0046434654,0.01618722,0.008225409,0.0025323865,0.005947454,0.00035662213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024651265,0.00003417952,0.0018285787,0.00063834595,0.00003727704,0.00030136766,0.0054362733,0.0010461208,0.0003264851,0.9193818,0.010463303,0.060481504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008364173,0.00014024772,0.0091354195,0.0042538904,0.00011054341,0.00043308377,0.0046098186,0.0024865072,0.00208138,0.5054873,0.47107765,0.00010046114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008783135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011885053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07222129,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009032141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01797698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38194722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W753213370","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139833912","title":"Bills of Rights in the Common Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Legislation; Common law; Exceptionalism; Fundamental rights; Legislature; Bill of rights; Reservation of rights; Constitutional law; Judicial review; Constitutional review; American exceptionalism; Human rights; Right to property; Politics","score_opus":0.03906299203612987,"score_gpt":0.2478455619613037,"score_spread":0.20878256992517383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W753213370","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023937149,0.011684473,0.0067135277,0.023706447,0.0008088166,0.00006591602,0.000068426925,0.000030351208,0.95452845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4646295,0.017966831,0.013094534,0.023758842,0.004414374,0.0009038383,0.00024050564,0.00014832802,0.4748433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936469,0.0025252113,0.00029656637,0.00079448917,0.0020949207,0.0006417947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967867,0.0017824735,0.0001856214,0.000590928,0.00050008897,0.00015411316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006151543,0.00042480888,0.00042454025,0.002079456,0.004324298,0.009212495,0.00096645637,0.003553917,0.0058288174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009596202,0.00034811455,0.00047450612,0.001789424,0.032287996,0.007174925,0.0029696275,0.0052916068,0.0014284347],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.6323035e-7,8.371236e-7,0.0000076882,0.0000035237329,2.2274075e-7,0.0000024444732,0.0001169855,0.000021521573,0.0000057032153,0.9959928,0.0028646176,0.0009830656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047349254,0.0000051539914,0.00014820044,0.00009225955,0.0000019247418,0.000018467013,0.00016108206,0.00010424369,0.00002997469,0.8135141,0.18591525,0.0000045961547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010333526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008942581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010333526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009410331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008520664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06827706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W76925935","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Cases in Ontario, 2008","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03716799095065223,"score_gpt":0.27175120293319277,"score_spread":0.23458321198254053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W76925935","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43371603,0.007629968,0.0005299018,0.07037962,0.0004880898,0.00044631696,0.011712787,0.000100988575,0.47499627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64294416,0.0035301729,0.00078719464,0.010571099,0.00016524685,0.0003493851,0.0014502094,0.000050202398,0.34015235],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99455947,0.00035721052,0.00020524097,0.00036291068,0.0020930236,0.002422146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918922,0.0023764828,0.0008298201,0.00040344935,0.0026252924,0.0018726967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023621842,0.00027044385,0.0005190149,0.001983789,0.029873293,0.0057168445,0.001984518,0.004373941,0.010686385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0128223905,0.0011600361,0.00052757876,0.005442963,0.0048447223,0.0016175722,0.0029658882,0.004424644,0.00057092676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041923267,0.00018031799,0.085833505,0.000570207,0.00015622054,0.0037912226,0.048928678,0.0013206817,0.0012033925,0.39871636,0.42667964,0.032200567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013882073,0.000039410486,0.28902626,0.00033349704,0.00011144405,0.0003189482,0.025181973,0.00055416825,0.0005649409,0.008646774,0.67497426,0.00010950981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9945998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8558218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14417821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22890274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.992632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W825752938","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2610","title":"Do Bills of Rights Matter?: An Examination of Court Change, Judicial Ideology, and the Support Structure for Rights in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Ideology; Law; Civil liberties; Political science; Constitutional theory; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Constitutional law; Sociology; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.018394792881188525,"score_gpt":0.2580451245913453,"score_spread":0.2396503317101568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W825752938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97274077,0.0014008025,0.00017145045,0.007198975,0.00003821722,0.00005073627,0.002266429,0.000015680966,0.016116945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996283,0.00040504095,0.00009919633,0.00036196795,0.000013916333,0.000007932827,0.0006054245,0.00001020431,0.0022133684],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99575543,0.00048125067,0.00013467326,0.00042447427,0.0014873608,0.001716832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97647345,0.0067238454,0.004194608,0.00065482303,0.007759151,0.004194004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037767661,0.00033826006,0.0009646143,0.0036344256,0.0075884005,0.004832943,0.0024582199,0.0011991651,0.0065963212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019391963,0.00028250748,0.0008096232,0.009468564,0.0041385563,0.0016006166,0.0023437557,0.0028690351,0.00036452385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028485613,0.00018992093,0.9344935,0.00010216789,0.00019689093,0.00033134661,0.012422619,0.0016606,0.00038375764,0.016504537,0.011721072,0.021708753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036763486,0.00004373106,0.965761,0.00009591338,0.00012756727,0.000033610475,0.0183452,0.0042239944,0.0001510905,0.0011357527,0.009982597,0.00006267531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9985672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.122911364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.122911364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12878674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89178854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W834177807","doi":"","title":"Enhancing the Methodology of Formal Constitutional Change in the UK","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Constitution; Political science; Referendum; Constitutional economics; Legislature; Law; Legislation; Politics; Constitutional law; Government (linguistics); Parliamentary sovereignty; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.37957690313645565,"score_gpt":0.4334279216432671,"score_spread":0.053851018506811454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W834177807","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050406102,0.009915238,0.49661207,0.075003326,0.0037879786,0.0038674558,0.0004917687,0.00073617377,0.35917985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6892459,0.0055654286,0.24159166,0.008176617,0.00096995465,0.0029227354,0.000391913,0.00051191926,0.050623953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8764137,0.09324109,0.0060999766,0.0076061976,0.013659321,0.0029797633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8638731,0.09398129,0.0055669285,0.016974166,0.01788547,0.0017190549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08484408,0.00054890366,0.0007996858,0.005361264,0.006362223,0.017049512,0.002564609,0.0041040746,0.008178575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1262329,0.00095418515,0.0010573681,0.005346676,0.028381543,0.014230457,0.011575371,0.0072670556,0.0019312431],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035433583,0.000036081557,0.0008938869,0.0003228507,0.000011576103,0.00017233093,0.020641252,0.0013455539,0.00040479877,0.90411085,0.0053002606,0.0667251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000824913,0.00018797857,0.003142077,0.0015377866,0.000035812518,0.00028688443,0.015570873,0.0035779101,0.0017168702,0.378289,0.5954163,0.00015609228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02911081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030765245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08484408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039441634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028309941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44870377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W85233168","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1254","title":"Charter Dialogue Revisited: Or \"Much Ado About Metaphors\"","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Phenomenon; Legislature; Supreme court; Legislation; Law; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03852778018458422,"score_gpt":0.31753062719961783,"score_spread":0.27900284701503364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W85233168","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031932674,0.049132895,0.0467775,0.34856704,0.0073587457,0.00006334234,0.00016414751,0.00022974412,0.51577383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9217612,0.009605314,0.0059750853,0.03254491,0.004360547,0.00014672287,0.000087808214,0.0002731171,0.02524532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98496825,0.010953692,0.00019344455,0.00087978115,0.002183765,0.00082115555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99059755,0.007110104,0.00060958986,0.0005527032,0.00083453226,0.00029550065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008742107,0.0009333743,0.0008306974,0.003883023,0.009143186,0.013153573,0.002466949,0.008002661,0.005567672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015750064,0.0003071428,0.0006148577,0.0037686136,0.06245298,0.023774283,0.0055551697,0.012174459,0.0007308157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058886985,0.0000034819911,0.000025164836,0.000030517336,0.0000011305017,0.00003507603,0.014959644,0.000030734107,0.000030114228,0.97809464,0.004762027,0.0020215926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023505867,0.000018066077,0.0001878726,0.00036508264,0.0000070778347,0.00024234175,0.032771472,0.00042378646,0.00020534273,0.5394379,0.42629156,0.000025958743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011746316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008285538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013153573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011825702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055168266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08580184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W856109484","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.86160-7","title":"Law and Courts in Authoritarian States","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Rule of law; Jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Legitimation; Discretion; Politics; Accountability; Law and economics; Democracy; Sociology","score_opus":0.037983242850055624,"score_gpt":0.29141572504837426,"score_spread":0.25343248219831865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W856109484","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004665539,0.028464535,0.0020678646,0.011279751,0.0004983454,0.000015943067,0.00005813174,0.000025978643,0.9529239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41449842,0.036860727,0.001892592,0.004050198,0.003001844,0.000120585035,0.00012935973,0.00007527561,0.539371],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919933,0.00039561704,0.000030270805,0.00007617588,0.00021294669,0.00008563508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991673,0.0006047008,0.00004819581,0.000056973844,0.000087639644,0.00003511396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011213693,0.00046123372,0.00041320384,0.0015541369,0.0028143106,0.006612655,0.0007817749,0.0036390715,0.020347005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018967575,0.000268792,0.00018569296,0.0027687594,0.011559838,0.003565513,0.0013055315,0.003162781,0.0018719416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.425551e-7,0.0000056865824,0.000015293608,0.000011696676,6.328569e-7,0.0000085741685,0.00045126153,0.00006679464,0.00001547378,0.9853467,0.009224317,0.004852792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004834931,0.0000042480297,0.00019262244,0.00017328277,0.0000018998891,0.000018809045,0.0006338949,0.00016728928,0.00003888463,0.8015782,0.19718125,0.000004751773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00939805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018049406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020347005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044625634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032025597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06806749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W87792680","doi":"10.29173/alr362","title":"The Last Word: Media Coverage of the Supreme Court of Canada, Florian Sauvageau, David Schneiderman and David Taras","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Philosophy; Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0254840135614499,"score_gpt":0.26635559056630537,"score_spread":0.24087157700485545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W87792680","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010412958,0.734796,0.000114067094,0.1787915,0.009022457,0.000011627977,0.0013227928,0.00004320025,0.07485703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07843001,0.67271215,0.00042584434,0.09935893,0.019173004,0.000050189334,0.0013792317,0.00017541673,0.1282952],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957396,0.0003589439,0.00009679251,0.00027404923,0.0030208891,0.0005098592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989583,0.0026169585,0.0005173438,0.0001673608,0.0063464954,0.00076889986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017356293,0.0008975382,0.0007502307,0.009191387,0.009425928,0.009792828,0.0020342923,0.004300317,0.014781317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010545702,0.00054968137,0.00036054928,0.0151442485,0.0064696656,0.0037180737,0.0015456723,0.0038630553,0.0020013638],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008419782,0.000005036391,0.00026752616,0.00021044398,0.000010338884,0.000033823428,0.0004526193,0.000052096984,0.000032874425,0.011360547,0.97068596,0.016880244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005224641,0.0000034361024,0.0030330354,0.0012682428,0.00002250733,0.000038522565,0.0010346359,0.000032368855,0.00006225791,0.0019165563,0.9925608,0.000022264383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9575395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.980605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05161787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05161787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07796418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3745156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W88077178","doi":"","title":"A procedural note on the recent use of Parliament's power to summons","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Summons; Parliament; Power (physics); Economics; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Politics; Physics","score_opus":0.09509350680892942,"score_gpt":0.30807115443462185,"score_spread":0.21297764762569243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W88077178","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016958226,0.011416321,0.00737112,0.6637183,0.016088357,0.00055468315,0.0017041961,0.00059615495,0.2815926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19088647,0.003922875,0.013380519,0.5695611,0.0066717532,0.0006187543,0.00047527082,0.00044390993,0.21403933],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.92655724,0.007524987,0.0045966716,0.007843549,0.041103356,0.012374205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9043195,0.05204903,0.0034610229,0.0049684257,0.030893238,0.0043088575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05334898,0.0010174506,0.0013451152,0.0049833334,0.026160927,0.019653548,0.009404856,0.039976735,0.0069032595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1363288,0.0022728106,0.0026100434,0.0059583765,0.01769166,0.005318874,0.0052963626,0.03962782,0.0018806717],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007815262,0.00005177202,0.0010502852,0.000239853,0.00009866743,0.0004275809,0.0065279566,0.00035990408,0.0015880886,0.4433077,0.5295177,0.016752277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010464212,0.000071416915,0.012286507,0.00066504715,0.00023932612,0.00018535784,0.0013582283,0.0005585356,0.0019614936,0.023810806,0.95845705,0.00030162162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83805186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93153775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83805186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05545906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10514253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40238553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W89137513","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-14953-0_4","title":"Measuring the Opacity of the ‘Veil of Ignorance’ in Constitutions: Theory, Method, and Some Results","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in public choice","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Opacity; Ignorance; Epistemology; Philosophy; Physics; Optics","score_opus":0.24874882157929934,"score_gpt":0.38322782213890083,"score_spread":0.1344790005596015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W89137513","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46353886,0.00867986,0.38907546,0.012420875,0.00036249126,0.00039385955,0.0009338851,0.00026570068,0.12432904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9467104,0.0011479555,0.048718657,0.00028765443,0.00011037932,0.00024980816,0.00016515754,0.00007527129,0.002534606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.969654,0.023377553,0.0007716365,0.0015823964,0.003988517,0.0006258051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.59818876,0.37093437,0.010446215,0.013266808,0.0062030046,0.00096081756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04049875,0.0009622359,0.0012013213,0.0042816936,0.0026088308,0.00774955,0.0019052268,0.002458364,0.0054367273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24412456,0.0008248358,0.0010648749,0.00820021,0.016439337,0.016630257,0.0045766635,0.0062671015,0.00039789168],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014894363,0.00025652058,0.03288516,0.0003935325,0.0002562416,0.000044675584,0.008318138,0.004354872,0.00058783026,0.88604677,0.0017321539,0.06497505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031111136,0.00010114347,0.018661931,0.0003361442,0.00014142181,0.00004508394,0.0031644886,0.012053174,0.0026628117,0.9577352,0.0049819206,0.00008555902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051597557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050336746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04049875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00336744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028661462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21418041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W91241816","doi":"10.1007/978-94-010-0808-2_10","title":"Forgetting the Act of Forgetting: Raz’s Inaccessible Origin of Legal Reasoning","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Law and philosophy library","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Immediacy; Forgetting; Presupposition; Legal positivism; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Law; Hierarchy; Sociology; Legal realism; Political science; Epistemology; Legal profession; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03527895221167357,"score_gpt":0.26996623950763105,"score_spread":0.23468728729595748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W91241816","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04532298,0.011225012,0.2272154,0.09568156,0.0016337438,0.000083801606,0.0004174183,0.00079198036,0.61762816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9326838,0.0014866134,0.025620854,0.0058170334,0.0007288565,0.000057197012,0.00009739352,0.0003447448,0.033163603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964709,0.0018591125,0.00015804009,0.00055524264,0.00064831605,0.00030837135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916432,0.0047163297,0.0004880251,0.0019330487,0.0010103594,0.00020912853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00491622,0.00047193427,0.0007136236,0.0014711384,0.00438772,0.0070578647,0.0019945456,0.0040129246,0.0061725713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020967636,0.000644269,0.0010071918,0.0010440064,0.038399007,0.01567012,0.0026443466,0.010234444,0.0012871092],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064549795,0.0000027931394,0.0000409816,0.000008779257,0.0000022790746,0.000012745719,0.001103662,0.000064849024,0.000026667922,0.99476963,0.0019185466,0.0020425569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003948903,0.0000026823914,0.00003385179,0.000013263771,0.0000036757524,0.000028056784,0.00013482998,0.00019644438,0.000066657005,0.98870254,0.01080825,0.0000057769216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00567912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049751075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070578647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00288939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025210727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025999784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W93368576","doi":"","title":"Through a Colored Looking Glass: A View of Judicial Partition, Family Land Loss, and Rule Setting","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Henan Institute of Science and Technology; Royal Canadian Geographical Society","keywords":"Colored; Partition (number theory); Law; Political science; Mathematics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.025682368487412507,"score_gpt":0.2791600821769393,"score_spread":0.25347771368952676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W93368576","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30726606,0.0077599017,0.018415064,0.07888404,0.0005067025,0.000057913596,0.000044330907,0.000054554785,0.58701146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99325985,0.00060738146,0.000621267,0.0013291448,0.00009960314,0.000017901066,0.000004297526,0.00001331335,0.0040472583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959363,0.0025872225,0.0000467677,0.0002854541,0.0004231685,0.0007210699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997851,0.0011200263,0.00031979437,0.00024727633,0.00021804628,0.0002439049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042567793,0.00024025499,0.00022772237,0.0021252139,0.013619958,0.010933382,0.0017245428,0.003743768,0.002701721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006796138,0.00028987494,0.00047249236,0.0012313824,0.07901231,0.007350755,0.004656385,0.004284665,0.00014521588],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005582882,0.000012442151,0.00048758916,0.0000064814526,0.0000020176824,0.0001011766,0.018674614,0.00016901898,0.000045442062,0.97750574,0.00086525665,0.002124615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033794753,0.00005811698,0.0035342942,0.00026118758,0.000027850443,0.00022355092,0.06855555,0.0015484551,0.0004455856,0.8346275,0.090637006,0.000047168138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021326534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022250447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021326534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076648016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006193959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055612266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W946449652","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511511035.010","title":"Vox Populi: Populism, the Legislative Process, and the Canadian Constitution","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Populism; Constitution; Legislature; Political science; Process (computing); Law; Computer science; Politics; Operating system","score_opus":0.022448138446521534,"score_gpt":0.22196151231656558,"score_spread":0.19951337387004403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W946449652","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011259121,0.05175438,0.0016525271,0.031845476,0.00079238735,0.000036426118,0.00013920305,0.00006799618,0.90245247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5070643,0.036920782,0.0025472657,0.01023403,0.0005851923,0.00008419282,0.00018660228,0.00012970399,0.4422479],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998838,0.00017421835,0.000012299695,0.00008637876,0.00052775186,0.00036141835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996308,0.00012080706,0.000018798162,0.000019373845,0.00014331465,0.0000668157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009647967,0.0005622287,0.00025409655,0.0022241888,0.013517605,0.006364376,0.0010561892,0.0015233807,0.0076070176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018864035,0.00021798335,0.00019036811,0.0038747229,0.015066281,0.0021901608,0.0013238171,0.0026712243,0.00065890775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054715074,0.0000031328066,0.00013869435,0.00003555541,0.0000016709816,0.000046100668,0.005692326,0.00012569726,0.00006314768,0.95698893,0.026441224,0.010458074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054523475,0.000003958044,0.0013626452,0.00014688012,0.000005613516,0.000041762185,0.004423832,0.00018608994,0.00014803863,0.08555455,0.9081046,0.000016622054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94785213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9686479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07715057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07715057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06885327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55976915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W953841527","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1048","title":"Book Notes: Mighty Judgment: How the Supreme Court of Canada Runs Your Life, by Philip Slayton","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.033550381472407034,"score_gpt":0.2537775982326635,"score_spread":0.22022721676025647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W953841527","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003313527,0.03234881,0.0010573022,0.6753458,0.009387873,0.000072702634,0.00077415875,0.00010656796,0.2775933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.048289593,0.01410526,0.001213648,0.26389077,0.0034565257,0.00009434172,0.0002266271,0.00029247548,0.66843086],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977738,0.00034978415,0.000058021727,0.00027275152,0.00094535574,0.0006001556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956722,0.001957734,0.00008846439,0.000085572465,0.001641527,0.0005545178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022573243,0.00078054337,0.00071356306,0.0019788267,0.034445453,0.016863838,0.0025756706,0.015710395,0.022440095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011157074,0.0009642604,0.0005198806,0.0044742487,0.014406242,0.0073852665,0.0019164272,0.015655337,0.0034773992],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062207027,0.000006754048,0.0001555066,0.0000221161,0.000003119163,0.000047091737,0.0015946853,0.00008487911,0.000021467042,0.077429086,0.9172564,0.0033726569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015539326,0.000006120804,0.001161004,0.00022863595,0.000014230887,0.000032341122,0.006388001,0.00014979106,0.00010050033,0.03103214,0.9608211,0.00005067571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9627758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9906267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9542353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045764674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09030933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33204746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W95418230","doi":"10.7202/029207ar","title":"Justice and the Grievance Procedure in the Federal Public Service","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Grievance; Adjudication; Legislature; Economic Justice; Political science; Public service; Service (business); Law; Criminology; Business; Psychology","score_opus":0.058720205157405954,"score_gpt":0.3000882793497998,"score_spread":0.24136807419239387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W95418230","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6770686,0.0046340483,0.0041614617,0.07107088,0.0003122795,0.00008211943,0.00006664533,0.000031773652,0.24257223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99285936,0.00042099584,0.00031168744,0.0029337485,0.00008572819,0.000025321879,0.0000068807294,0.0000057893,0.0033504637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9641718,0.019818388,0.0010401123,0.0014237193,0.0056604724,0.00788553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93668157,0.048996955,0.007366927,0.001949169,0.0030847646,0.0019206199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02858779,0.00020575926,0.0004917779,0.002288291,0.023131086,0.011756638,0.0012777129,0.007419297,0.0037657623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.073578276,0.0005209402,0.00046144854,0.0030666587,0.025260817,0.0054266783,0.003746689,0.0087326905,0.0005221011],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009714586,0.00023891123,0.011249629,0.000051311235,0.000015539172,0.0003760733,0.017660484,0.00064889935,0.00052005873,0.95167565,0.004676901,0.01278937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018789982,0.00066061056,0.105149105,0.000943331,0.00010735645,0.0005741992,0.06207733,0.0038041768,0.0032261566,0.69276416,0.13026021,0.0002455364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0770309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14831442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0770309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012260137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02435433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15316504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W96210955","doi":"","title":"New Constitutional Ideas: Can New Parliamentary Models Resist Judicial Dominance When Interpreting Rights?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Judicial review; Legitimacy; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Constitutionalism; Law; Human rights; Constitutional theory; Legislature; International human rights law; Politics; Parliamentary sovereignty; Legislation; Sociology; Democracy; Parliament","score_opus":0.03310356322175908,"score_gpt":0.30227748066509436,"score_spread":0.2691739174433353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W96210955","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01898981,0.013075887,0.102536894,0.4968057,0.0044860225,0.00010937674,0.00010590739,0.00021495677,0.36367545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83734757,0.0076368116,0.06548575,0.05086241,0.008124337,0.000512665,0.00013177509,0.00022851834,0.029670184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9678287,0.018364301,0.0011376981,0.003198626,0.0077203265,0.0017502905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95865184,0.028387556,0.0028254143,0.0043928465,0.004080421,0.0016618897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039736215,0.0005626209,0.0007237418,0.003450138,0.006636245,0.018917143,0.004677252,0.00857761,0.0053075156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04890085,0.0005800279,0.0006959567,0.0019107597,0.081371255,0.027160853,0.0055856826,0.012224226,0.001125459],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021851467,0.000003186643,0.000026314914,0.000011512339,0.0000011616987,0.000007689898,0.0007868629,0.000057137288,0.000016481845,0.9957189,0.0010193961,0.0023491778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001756968,0.000011488705,0.00010565622,0.00011739597,0.000005546374,0.000031751384,0.0009410541,0.0006205143,0.00010353383,0.9218701,0.07616122,0.0000141043665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005747458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00817489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039736215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014429031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008718911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21014768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W97316950","doi":"","title":"Factbound and Splitless: Certiorari and Indian Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Certiorari; Supreme court; Law; Political science; State (computer science); Sociology; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.028295190105892237,"score_gpt":0.29602145258625717,"score_spread":0.2677262624803649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W97316950","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40860134,0.060288027,0.013959995,0.10556409,0.0009434609,0.00013980543,0.00020951027,0.000095226664,0.4101985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98116505,0.00456656,0.00066960347,0.0061495514,0.00056184654,0.000025775795,0.000040904,0.00002009528,0.0068005417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905419,0.0031666078,0.00046381124,0.0013290778,0.0027909817,0.0017076125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9588738,0.027896248,0.0068019126,0.002456952,0.0024186943,0.0015522557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009426992,0.00022623195,0.0004845407,0.004070911,0.004847118,0.013671347,0.0016036676,0.0035984805,0.0064926054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03573522,0.0003831115,0.0005267105,0.0048409235,0.027224565,0.008037824,0.0036284144,0.007344634,0.00046619723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000739701,0.000113272676,0.023903498,0.00018248492,0.000026915732,0.001218654,0.015642524,0.0005655031,0.00040350138,0.89773643,0.011964989,0.048168387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004000058,0.0001824952,0.122792475,0.0012939892,0.00015479648,0.0027186093,0.0537861,0.003535288,0.0019443131,0.59211326,0.22121647,0.00022229741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033299886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033840764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033299886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009382475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00779185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06807494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W97340422","doi":"10.1007/978-0-387-89672-4_4","title":"Party Rhetoric and Practice: A Normative Perspective from Political Science","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in public choice","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Rhetoric; Perspective (graphical); Politics; Epistemology; Political rhetoric; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Computer science; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.10741115002812072,"score_gpt":0.40758358555977037,"score_spread":0.30017243553164963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W97340422","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017405571,0.018627768,0.040383752,0.10125617,0.00083426357,0.000038044644,0.00007473228,0.000046976354,0.82133275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9255009,0.008074417,0.00897015,0.0056806174,0.0021218215,0.00022258637,0.0000627875,0.00015722847,0.049209543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916215,0.005497705,0.00017892967,0.00053136237,0.0017937244,0.00037680188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9804952,0.017007435,0.000522216,0.00073468854,0.0009920987,0.0002483527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010342984,0.00057857187,0.00070212083,0.0028525207,0.0037050291,0.012100431,0.0017517271,0.006167425,0.005205048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016007697,0.0004910518,0.00027229034,0.0035975093,0.044712193,0.0133330375,0.0023478821,0.0069070756,0.0006361882],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.4178625e-7,0.000004316105,0.00001367061,0.0000062830286,4.041882e-7,0.000003558205,0.00047724473,0.00004054321,0.0000105378795,0.9972904,0.0007785737,0.0013735881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027493481,0.0000025824681,0.000059012822,0.000044121327,9.692035e-7,0.00001001942,0.0005647188,0.00020064828,0.000051288935,0.98345023,0.015611342,0.0000023726598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001975398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029910908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012100431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049029994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004377885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0546996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W992228728","doi":"10.1515/9781773855714-018","title":"16 Ethical Decision Making: An Idea Whose Time Had Come","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Obstacle; Polycentricity; Key (lock); Political science; Decision maker; Judicial opinion; Process (computing); Rationality; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Management science; Computer science; Economics; Management; Computer security; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.036538333185074115,"score_gpt":0.2743789187304727,"score_spread":0.2378405855453986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W992228728","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0074149193,0.03149453,0.05021057,0.2521375,0.0044595185,0.000061011062,0.00006633705,0.000056666733,0.654099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70254827,0.019698823,0.031734865,0.041016985,0.0040955557,0.00029396827,0.00007743308,0.00016398898,0.20037013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99489224,0.003316457,0.00013263107,0.0004668111,0.000850618,0.00034125542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967025,0.0018442662,0.00015892799,0.00041778354,0.0005629535,0.00031355946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009968965,0.00063124346,0.00055313413,0.0013165829,0.0057035433,0.013636547,0.001430489,0.0045415196,0.004307622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072093583,0.00025633787,0.0005475983,0.0011272653,0.06088133,0.012148057,0.0034424048,0.008666861,0.0010203997],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.872057e-7,0.0000013069025,0.000011259614,0.000005472822,5.29727e-7,0.0000057957864,0.0006314996,0.00003079266,0.000008873123,0.99650323,0.0014783372,0.0013219176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004255662,0.0000046121436,0.000025689487,0.00008958102,0.0000013534458,0.00001664055,0.0011114515,0.00012133299,0.00002825671,0.90153456,0.09705825,0.0000039096494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040595457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049327114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013636547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008042172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0080539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058350325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}