{"meta":{"query_hash":"985836f594cd","filters":{"topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies"},"cohort_total":2130,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":2130,"exported":2130,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/985836f594cd","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Judicial+and+Constitutional+Studies"},"results":[{"id":"W10057505","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1284","title":"Appointment of Justice Marshall Rothstein to the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Insider; Economic Justice; Political science","score_opus":0.017357307053110727,"score_gpt":0.2497616599389269,"score_spread":0.23240435288581618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W10057505","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01003218,0.00065188855,0.00031461756,0.017331246,0.000511635,0.00016462519,0.000030058727,0.000005781384,0.970958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99838734,0.00005047115,0.0002451936,0.00038396788,0.00050554454,0.0000034744805,6.0604106e-7,0.0000033005958,0.000420093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985948,0.00010015738,0.00028853922,0.00007949579,0.00069099624,0.00024598849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993209,0.00010127897,0.00015507263,0.00007492521,0.00026026138,0.000087559885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006186238,0.00007301424,0.000158158,0.000017026994,0.00096258125,0.000022664028,0.00027116213,0.000027754799,0.00012874122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007265485,0.000051412633,0.00006141789,0.0001241596,0.00026473092,0.00005470528,0.000045214292,0.000107018765,0.000004138224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017595774,0.000042310665,0.0005621634,0.0000053182343,0.000032003525,0.000008329454,0.0003715521,0.000529591,0.000077318626,0.98518014,0.012852909,0.0003207421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007822666,0.00020633377,0.016370738,0.00023958179,0.00030019745,0.000042983793,0.013273586,0.00002413011,0.0011930466,0.31233993,0.65483165,0.00039552973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98249894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99827445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98835516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016216404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006579365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7403494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1022707983","doi":"","title":"The Court's Mulligan: a commennt on Canada (attorney general) v. Hislop","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Dissent; Constitution; Context (archaeology); Political science; Majority opinion; Economic Justice; Interpretation (philosophy); Mulligan; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027721448784000135,"score_gpt":0.25956184668630367,"score_spread":0.23184039790230354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1022707983","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025983771,0.053509593,0.00028884012,0.45811304,0.010444096,0.0008973614,0.00021877103,0.00013535368,0.45040917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96962845,0.013645885,0.00014154335,0.006221923,0.0027016015,0.00003267397,0.000015770376,0.000009819326,0.0076023173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99705774,0.00029144212,0.00058504305,0.00050361437,0.0006942978,0.00086784293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980685,0.00070517824,0.00024399252,0.0003592744,0.00030861952,0.00031439486],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005668033,0.00041293007,0.00044859826,0.00004743905,0.005700297,0.00019892046,0.00062491605,0.0001929196,0.00013974356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004014679,0.00034180438,0.00020720223,0.00055248215,0.0036971716,0.00019191975,0.000080958045,0.00042486558,0.00017757594],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033443597,0.00017311583,0.00029361865,0.00001074323,0.00012833107,0.00008119592,0.00058946403,0.0008268792,0.000015827924,0.9159229,0.06632354,0.015600968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032413608,0.0001054391,0.0014988207,0.00036169353,0.00009772118,0.000025797515,0.0022679442,0.00012734445,0.000034670637,0.019839784,0.974871,0.0004456747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44168508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7764248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9436447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013655407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036632586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W108443798","doi":"10.21991/c9jd4k","title":"THE SUPREME COURT ENTRENCHES PARLIAMENTARY PRIVILEGE OUT OF THE CHARTER'S REACH: DONOHOE V. CBC","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Privilege (computing); Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04460770952854883,"score_gpt":0.2600284529136868,"score_spread":0.21542074338513797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W108443798","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030163795,0.006869382,0.010240151,0.054416385,0.019110423,0.003160054,0.0013836005,0.0004292611,0.8742269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971846,0.00074302667,0.00017255831,0.00090909295,0.00038201548,0.00013819158,0.000027302227,0.00000819472,0.0004350575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964115,0.00024866968,0.000795418,0.000484085,0.001077335,0.0009829766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795145,0.00037999928,0.0004068182,0.0005232854,0.00051009445,0.00022836411],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075426954,0.00036633687,0.0003898799,0.000094405405,0.006800574,0.000090730784,0.001105797,0.0002018822,0.00036402265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063312624,0.0002427212,0.00044423126,0.00042546174,0.028695226,0.00057438965,0.0004140242,0.00036581815,0.00017619539],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005992404,0.00014964181,0.08567596,0.00000557453,0.00018484025,0.000005692513,0.0011784463,0.000008596375,0.00008274239,0.9025464,0.008827039,0.001275135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010653738,0.00007459645,0.013426609,0.0002745217,0.00020863664,0.000038174723,0.031141007,0.000026631347,0.0007810997,0.18609637,0.7662222,0.00064481597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036717514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019189859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96702075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032972675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025933767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99870735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W10959497","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1470703","title":"A Content Analysis of Supreme Court of Canada Judgments: Preliminary Observations","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ontario Institute of Technology; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Content (measure theory); Content analysis; Political science; Psychology; Mathematics; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.04380172547238111,"score_gpt":0.2737753492614412,"score_spread":0.22997362378906008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W10959497","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97185165,0.004414002,0.0011958765,0.012131116,0.00016368924,0.00013925917,0.000023385008,0.000009256413,0.010071783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975934,0.0017111908,0.000025221838,0.00015070503,0.000063779175,0.0000012622112,0.0000028196246,0.000001392494,0.00045022834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983429,0.00006389762,0.00030051087,0.000077246375,0.00049628393,0.0007192161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928015,0.000057697853,0.00021094146,0.000057864803,0.00033900712,0.000054356038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008028481,0.00006207444,0.0002257506,0.00009311921,0.00042346533,0.000007014717,0.00018245522,0.000027938064,0.000026319021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016210068,0.0000554521,0.00012556273,0.00062138954,0.00014063543,0.0000927875,0.000011106136,0.00024543924,2.1868084e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053208205,0.00011003998,0.031458903,9.3565626e-7,0.0013898859,0.0000013891565,0.00083020603,0.00027906033,0.00022860686,0.9634749,0.00038442083,0.0017884324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005744991,0.0006518451,0.6672738,0.000047449426,0.0016038554,0.00000628425,0.03523812,0.00009536375,0.000100748824,0.28963572,0.0045323386,0.00023993551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47690904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91564006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6738392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008068927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007629782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99799603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W112197869","doi":"10.21991/c9xt0m","title":"THOUGHTS ON CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS RECOGNIZING AN INHERENT ABORIGINAL RIGHT TO SELF-GOVERNMENT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Constitutional right; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Psychology; Sociology; Linguistics; Constitution; Philosophy","score_opus":0.044421854086359736,"score_gpt":0.30768330344413425,"score_spread":0.2632614493577745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W112197869","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030151399,0.00051378476,0.06252341,0.005589948,0.009504726,0.0026924706,0.0011606085,0.0010616118,0.886802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883229,0.0002142561,0.005671703,0.0035730123,0.0013937864,0.00029903342,0.00009589107,0.000017400618,0.0004119898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935611,0.0002850933,0.0009629021,0.0012312435,0.0023496998,0.0016099549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971803,0.00021152779,0.00031732983,0.00049873063,0.0006621092,0.0011300114],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008859988,0.0007116866,0.0006189946,0.0003254163,0.0063689277,0.00021418904,0.0008586349,0.0003406339,0.0011171149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035922002,0.0006900739,0.00033110837,0.00084835576,0.011915265,0.0013536786,0.00020900603,0.000517902,0.001524814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030416207,0.0010970051,0.011686083,0.000007999814,0.0002378178,0.00011329609,0.0012923277,0.00011472058,0.000115534036,0.98019993,0.0037169044,0.0011142107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001816921,0.0004660616,0.0015137399,0.00035698953,0.00017268359,0.00010537084,0.005952008,0.00003658152,0.0014114477,0.09018964,0.896601,0.0013775429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010587543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022560344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95817155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018314029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040033446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W114679256","doi":"10.18261/issn1891-814x-2012-03-07","title":"Economic and Social Rights Across Time, Regions, and Legal Traditions: A Preliminary Analysis of the TIESR Dataset","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nordic Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Social rights; Political science; Law; International human rights law; Reservation of rights; Norm (philosophy); Human rights; Fundamental rights; Right to property","score_opus":0.02783690283989469,"score_gpt":0.3142922942626533,"score_spread":0.2864553914227586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W114679256","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953836,0.0010140201,0.0000048869715,0.00078762166,0.00015381999,0.00006911398,0.00037234378,0.0000035885507,0.002210984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99917805,0.000043168657,0.000012841623,0.00004191327,0.00053441693,0.0000014267085,0.000021168724,0.0000019068814,0.00016508016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903435,0.00014621261,0.000309814,0.00008333991,0.00023288086,0.00019342234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993836,0.00010159567,0.0003153032,0.00006911321,0.000054546643,0.00007579826],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054454,0.000083750114,0.00028641464,0.000092828464,0.0027115324,0.00004278092,0.00017289382,0.000054605574,0.00009645718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007087018,0.00005250621,0.00012937594,0.00012794124,0.0014040442,0.0004389233,0.000041797444,0.00012858336,0.0000034437978],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009513467,0.00024016331,0.013458636,0.000010281885,0.0020085608,0.00001367585,0.02377023,0.0000056582876,0.000044961187,0.9226057,0.037484363,0.00026262325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010442989,0.0002430219,0.4991615,0.00008381694,0.0030104055,0.00008581011,0.0035880187,0.000011548738,0.000057684105,0.13149539,0.36085036,0.00036815577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028879838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009015668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79111034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059653452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005907931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W11544044","doi":"10.1016/s0956-5663(01)00164-6","title":"Canadian Courts: Law, Politics, And Process","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law; Political science; Process (computing); Computer science","score_opus":0.016112874088657646,"score_gpt":0.27623829300786246,"score_spread":0.2601254189192048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W11544044","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000011976109,0.0011500185,8.364556e-7,0.006193297,0.00010494456,0.00012639133,0.000028174316,0.000035303463,0.992349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03342147,0.0004416967,0.000011297596,0.0047807856,0.0008036343,0.0000036188112,0.000012880062,0.0000047448275,0.96051985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992273,0.000012062658,0.000089278015,0.00015091691,0.00023031805,0.00029015492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994972,0.000030103205,0.000027471233,0.000041811865,0.00013535298,0.0002681138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009970869,0.00010159209,0.00015179518,0.000044266988,0.0011072396,0.00005767214,0.000103073566,0.0001673685,0.00022762205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034749486,0.00009435178,0.000026686024,0.000024505696,0.00079774123,0.000051231014,0.00001046028,0.00010584569,0.00005374035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.1032693e-7,0.0000019557756,0.000027281792,0.0000028124136,0.000011367844,0.000006417717,0.00054454565,4.6144347e-8,3.079642e-9,0.9288523,0.07010934,0.00044370515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000150857495,0.0000045447014,0.000029160274,0.000020047131,0.00001047604,3.8277477e-7,0.00027087244,4.8242267e-8,6.186524e-8,0.4330622,0.5665081,0.00007898694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.894482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98364085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4963988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044011927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004385483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8516104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1166798639","doi":"","title":"« A Supreme Court’s Place in the Constitutional Order: Contrasting Recent Experiences in Canada and the United Kingdom »","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Certiorari; Constitution; Constitutional law; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.022598856552028826,"score_gpt":0.25904470877901437,"score_spread":0.23644585222698555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1166798639","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93546504,0.0025362798,0.00049123645,0.056864016,0.00025563285,0.0002158826,0.0000025848287,0.000005876778,0.0041634603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99332947,0.005926658,0.0000036014035,0.0005379304,0.00015426132,0.000022169006,2.7422993e-7,0.0000014872599,0.000024140578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769664,0.00042993645,0.00022311028,0.00011042821,0.0005492801,0.0009906021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883246,0.0008626978,0.000089232395,0.000040043622,0.00013911775,0.000036418325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038909095,0.00008245983,0.00012802475,0.000049741502,0.0009634649,0.00004686473,0.00025290283,0.000026095122,0.00003023417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012515066,0.000038177455,0.000019099729,0.0004113463,0.0018161066,0.000110999674,0.000024366358,0.0004924867,9.1343e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007436435,0.000010115209,0.020406699,2.5215363e-7,0.000018824263,0.000005899322,0.004694858,0.000014139841,0.000002574935,0.9724977,0.000078609766,0.0021959462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0050940663,0.00006428638,0.010889038,0.00016463673,0.00002773584,0.00023020816,0.44659358,0.00006786759,0.0000038019816,0.428194,0.108348794,0.00032201328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8931611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9962144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5443037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019194263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018234035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9873317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1198639546","doi":"","title":"Whither Justice: The Common Problematic of Five Models of ‘Access to Justice'","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Criminology; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.07199145081357904,"score_gpt":0.34382518410889723,"score_spread":0.2718337332953182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1198639546","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22036318,0.00039698166,0.0008726751,0.058401827,0.0010237653,0.0019250138,0.000024376113,0.00011152574,0.7168807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996778,0.000510486,0.00021811281,0.0015066556,0.00032181464,0.000090726615,0.000009051237,0.00001451496,0.0005506143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977647,0.00018423636,0.0005558007,0.00028774346,0.0008345141,0.00037302295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983192,0.00048201796,0.00031298702,0.00028734526,0.0004759964,0.00012241608],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006913261,0.0001988355,0.00038193318,0.00012033697,0.0013255632,0.00009067043,0.0007544418,0.00008244,0.00053261797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040788352,0.00015135197,0.00012245389,0.0009773975,0.0012119425,0.0006350956,0.00014734306,0.00014195104,0.00007966207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015627737,0.00025187715,0.0019702301,0.00016837199,0.00024920603,0.00000334139,0.028875204,0.010048074,0.0006127938,0.94486403,0.0011127862,0.01168781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023124302,0.00043334343,0.034618497,0.00096094306,0.0033929765,0.000015304442,0.09296626,0.0016967517,0.0003041148,0.77764505,0.0840179,0.0016364575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044533084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051137246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7764148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001328423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003063181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W120683721","doi":"","title":"Guarding the Guardians? Towards an Independent, Accountable and Diverse Senior Judiciary","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business","score_opus":0.02589877427652125,"score_gpt":0.24055741508862366,"score_spread":0.2146586408121024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W120683721","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85658705,0.0007082868,0.00069026044,0.00089397136,0.0004822895,0.0004023965,0.0001139598,0.0000627439,0.14005904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99804187,0.00073162775,0.00038815805,0.000034005603,0.00030253848,2.4576173e-7,0.0000088887155,0.0000062268623,0.00048643677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756044,0.0003425226,0.00023886708,0.00038138047,0.00096096774,0.0005158156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984825,0.00015723385,0.00033335589,0.00035301893,0.0004012391,0.00027260362],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011289234,0.00024867445,0.0003574453,0.00010525561,0.006988991,0.000059310136,0.0009731579,0.00022797879,0.00015462014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005489398,0.00023348084,0.00023840515,0.00041476675,0.0062015494,0.0017795905,0.0003323103,0.00043798584,0.000018465695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003960634,0.0006107574,0.039231986,0.000052967545,0.00067016983,0.00016711316,0.040182907,0.00033513672,0.0039228546,0.90870875,0.0005438962,0.0051774173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011838616,0.0001891513,0.4742967,0.00017150996,0.0005887689,0.00010502743,0.49003336,0.000060507424,0.00034864468,0.0063682958,0.026031055,0.00062312605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05185197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0078032534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9023404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026329106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009929877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W122286134","doi":"10.29173/alr176","title":"Continuing Questions in Canadian Political Finance Law: Third Parties and Small Political Parties","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Appeal; Harm; Law; Apprehension; Political science; Campaign finance","score_opus":0.024430265972964566,"score_gpt":0.2999949000067067,"score_spread":0.27556463403374215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W122286134","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07989352,0.03181134,6.1920747e-7,0.077438034,0.00034712648,0.00039946678,0.000014800724,0.000026296799,0.8100688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880238,0.004501807,0.00003588513,0.0068343016,0.00017354682,0.000057734844,0.0000022032443,0.0000040762475,0.00036664735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984595,0.0001163611,0.00024074873,0.00018444048,0.0001239157,0.0008750383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902713,0.00036814203,0.000028237273,0.000105627216,0.000070793714,0.00040005165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048092744,0.00010795249,0.0002789598,0.000018017887,0.00053717825,0.00005623882,0.000121605175,0.00007957097,0.00005663378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010570353,0.00009618998,0.000049508442,0.000114381284,0.0017941733,0.00012571369,0.00003679745,0.00020827934,0.000055387594],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.432069e-7,0.000010226893,0.00836312,0.00003911388,0.0000045620177,0.0000038534176,0.00026245837,1.7965538e-8,9.042842e-7,0.990868,0.0001385908,0.00030852054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000497189,0.00000864798,0.0045279255,0.0007963484,0.000028357246,0.000003944308,0.00015226266,9.335082e-7,0.0000033055107,0.08230461,0.91198397,0.00013999439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9861349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9118454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006780552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030813963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66107064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1235474944","doi":"10.3138/9781442674639","title":"Establishing the Rules of the Game: Election Laws in Democracies","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Normative; Political science; Election law; Agency (philosophy); Law; Variety (cybernetics); General election; Political economy; Politics; Law and economics; Sociology; Social science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.020309459646307735,"score_gpt":0.264268891581997,"score_spread":0.24395943193568928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1235474944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00055499084,0.0013202158,0.000015837371,0.0026795415,0.0005262151,0.00021264744,0.000005658049,0.000015192199,0.9946697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.063787416,0.0012964038,0.000021518275,0.0005732314,0.00047597854,0.000018758763,0.000002334159,0.000006890568,0.93381745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989632,0.00015059419,0.00018433454,0.000119474484,0.000413988,0.00016840418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933714,0.00032839068,0.00012489971,0.000096510106,0.00009888683,0.000014159272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056339626,0.0000946961,0.00016082196,0.000034527762,0.0006925093,0.000051798845,0.00030267617,0.00012919524,0.00011861071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048140372,0.000049658258,0.00009654182,0.00016903233,0.0010689396,0.00009780354,0.00006093159,0.0002459239,0.000012844441],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001693512,0.000008060595,0.0004997943,0.000003277332,0.000014933968,2.6693675e-7,0.001311237,0.0000042563665,0.0000016057194,0.9637902,0.03286232,0.0015023991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027504046,0.000003400845,0.0012775871,0.00005432235,0.000015209863,3.0195926e-7,0.0010094463,4.2518502e-7,0.000008831819,0.40841118,0.5891278,0.00006402844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009943475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06075293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5562655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017887633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009040974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W124479448","doi":"","title":"Towards a civic republican theory of canadian constitutional law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Constitutional theory; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.043656627411462395,"score_gpt":0.26340414330657613,"score_spread":0.21974751589511374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W124479448","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010264477,0.00045557672,0.000061013357,0.0013761701,0.00046290192,0.00016154881,0.00008119215,0.000057356683,0.98707974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99659824,0.0000680636,0.00033743167,0.0019219168,0.00028830615,0.000022650971,0.000006511291,0.000004215193,0.00075263635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860793,0.00015766002,0.00023230248,0.00021784886,0.00038440732,0.00039984533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902475,0.000062176376,0.00007641616,0.0001602407,0.00025765787,0.00041876276],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080768846,0.00011283529,0.00019518545,0.00012394557,0.001149551,0.00003638615,0.00031396432,0.00010434043,0.004167198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029195865,0.00010698099,0.00010028765,0.00050234434,0.0056116953,0.00026145158,0.000052989777,0.00015211296,0.000116257164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013803973,0.000032918535,0.0023731068,0.0000024702265,0.000045381126,0.000009872822,0.0012944199,3.5618757e-7,0.000009974058,0.99452645,0.0013030149,0.00038823826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014513402,0.00002394063,0.005950145,0.000025387752,0.000020999489,0.0000024442777,0.0016654627,1.6103343e-7,0.000111881156,0.3967084,0.5951963,0.00014972386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9079474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9294716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9863338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001595216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019515385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99709445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1257524986","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-18775-4_4","title":"The Challenges of Participatory Justice for Public Adjudication","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Citizen journalism; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.3591794197208242,"score_gpt":0.3771604515411503,"score_spread":0.01798103182032612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1257524986","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000019613824,0.02733517,0.00007591671,0.015628787,0.00038775033,0.00025684375,0.000013569601,0.000026512986,0.9562735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41311696,0.04455306,0.000110292865,0.00028805074,0.0027430223,0.0002412374,0.000010552263,0.000024993256,0.5389118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916404,0.000022997976,0.00017638564,0.00012056072,0.00035772574,0.00015826356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867296,0.0003954046,0.00015276558,0.000100633784,0.00061305333,0.000065184846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087400555,0.000079757985,0.00014561029,0.00002216388,0.0007252961,0.000015598216,0.00018934422,0.00011933593,0.00005634509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000502519,0.000054519212,0.00007220995,0.0000147203045,0.0010285164,0.000048418686,0.000038225193,0.00005807397,0.00003504502],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005099342,0.0000055672213,0.0000018066685,0.000008519161,0.000046068817,6.2703556e-8,0.0005252421,1.0302124e-7,1.3650667e-7,0.9709217,0.011279445,0.017206246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029900475,0.000013453032,0.000013727111,0.0000113342085,0.000058481644,2.4526454e-8,0.0012634746,5.735659e-7,2.952399e-7,0.4139118,0.5846528,0.000044131324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024800422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008306286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5733734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000631241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005545387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5578464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W127388596","doi":"10.7275/w4ez-yd90","title":"Contesting constitutional meaning : the political Constitution and the myth of judicial supremacy.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Constitution; Politics; Meaning (existential); Political science; Mythology; Law; Originalism; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Theology","score_opus":0.0219819495448625,"score_gpt":0.23844983113971188,"score_spread":0.2164678815948494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W127388596","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1459323,0.003086789,0.0074680164,0.17290883,0.0010999076,0.0013437519,0.0002447065,0.00013148125,0.6677842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989401,0.00005230089,0.00013947712,0.00070101884,0.00008926317,0.000001547356,0.00000436434,0.0000019470697,0.000069986156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806935,0.000641774,0.00016820579,0.00018228458,0.0006561665,0.00028221353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859214,0.00083102734,0.00018821351,0.00011584663,0.00019474335,0.00007802875],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017689246,0.00009441945,0.0002336031,0.00006303786,0.005476066,0.000030143712,0.00039042535,0.000053327673,0.00018669308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005996183,0.000078305304,0.000113778246,0.00036717896,0.015407392,0.00023516864,0.00034351973,0.00046037947,0.0000023612765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015958791,0.000029691706,0.0068034083,0.0000035389435,0.00007889165,0.000007115643,0.003777042,0.0001113891,0.000029496588,0.9876507,0.00076301233,0.0005861625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0060963607,0.00014005344,0.01216261,0.00016767507,0.00061961275,0.000055454442,0.52400243,0.0005374559,0.00001841067,0.2729702,0.1827115,0.0005182388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01166652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001178944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8530078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015073408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056899973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W127556963","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Rights Coming Home to Roost? Rights Internationalism in American Courts","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital USD (University of San Diego)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; International human rights law; Law; Jurisprudence; Reservation of rights; Fundamental rights; Internationalism (politics); Right to property; Constitutionalism; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.01052998157433865,"score_gpt":0.2256508280608059,"score_spread":0.21512084648646726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W127556963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7285966,0.000037066042,0.0006820606,0.0007733654,0.00012699106,0.000105353196,0.00010881034,0.000030341018,0.2695394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99912596,0.0000031357963,0.00013786623,0.000047007965,0.000092950024,3.326179e-7,0.000038301892,0.0000012566682,0.0005532097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909085,0.00002248565,0.00011510763,0.00018530207,0.0003799177,0.00020635253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955344,0.000090655085,0.00008133629,0.000054884546,0.00013728919,0.0000823923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008299192,0.00008745627,0.00018260328,0.00012438378,0.00058339373,0.000044991208,0.0002276014,0.000033665507,0.00013174544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020286325,0.00010011177,0.00007161081,0.00031458752,0.0024329487,0.0005166687,0.000092388094,0.00006328653,0.00006976405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029497496,0.000100576006,0.021554692,0.0000014257978,0.000021187283,0.00004759056,0.0012160746,0.000054136162,0.000009835916,0.97432077,0.0016850868,0.00095912325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078945,0.0000650126,0.29000807,0.000112006324,0.000023118504,0.0000033957713,0.0053376863,0.000022510943,0.000014653266,0.29010049,0.41311836,0.0004052725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07247424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11331726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6842203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019291943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000945357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93370223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W129572977","doi":"","title":"The rule of unwritten law: a cautious critique of Charkaoui v. Canada","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Jurisprudence; Rule of law; Citizenship; Appeal; Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Humanities; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01766387135502968,"score_gpt":0.24937815344638295,"score_spread":0.23171428209135328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W129572977","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86703414,0.045084406,0.000054366963,0.03221209,0.0030860868,0.00033629895,0.0001989646,0.00004123736,0.05195239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864451,0.0091458,0.00011002053,0.0007495967,0.00078362355,0.000011983549,0.0000051519173,0.000020746504,0.0027279297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996575,0.00044788283,0.0009244138,0.00033911606,0.00096051244,0.00075306196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974782,0.00089868635,0.0004981904,0.00027333098,0.00066259044,0.00018900621],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009873821,0.0003082628,0.00059001695,0.000064197025,0.0032381276,0.000034088192,0.0006535024,0.00017651629,0.000031941236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044454492,0.00025507068,0.00027485113,0.00063993956,0.004074593,0.000165128,0.00013309128,0.0004905778,0.000010251539],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000865051,0.00026044936,0.00497743,0.00007871057,0.000561623,0.000262804,0.023162154,0.00010053773,0.001541942,0.9507018,0.015120489,0.0031455623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015967987,0.0004764715,0.013377922,0.0018926812,0.000550763,0.00042146232,0.029847769,0.0001940519,0.014202942,0.067708164,0.8681977,0.0015332889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81365776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6787646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88299364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031431305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030087386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W129869233","doi":"","title":"Doctrines Without Borders: The \"New\" Israeli Exclusionary Rule and the Dangers of Legal Transplantation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stanford Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Exclusionary rule; Political science; Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Common law; Unitary state; Legal doctrine; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02687096107789107,"score_gpt":0.31835366642894186,"score_spread":0.2914827053510508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W129869233","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010359679,0.48910326,0.00016384666,0.042298667,0.00034275328,0.0013536721,0.00003108551,0.00005300293,0.45629406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48418403,0.51274616,0.0000617009,0.00249639,0.0001619408,0.000021090276,0.0000028280624,0.0000027199344,0.00032318846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991516,0.00012761004,0.0001979357,0.000090800204,0.0003106596,0.00012141304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995488,0.00016135449,0.00008393519,0.000082204875,0.00009047521,0.000033238044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052720925,0.00007409826,0.00020545331,0.000007410304,0.0010699996,0.00001073383,0.00014455995,0.000020322092,0.00004532326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000087387416,0.000036745598,0.00007582574,0.00018211543,0.0019418709,0.00013620984,0.000025317666,0.00006401177,0.000003892294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004058882,0.0000066543466,0.00025769125,0.00009929233,0.000023579043,0.0000021099409,0.002956908,4.0290124e-7,0.0000011701321,0.9877248,0.0020090314,0.006877775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003139624,0.000012134992,0.0005878825,0.00043622323,0.0000866673,0.0000075541802,0.00075184426,4.954795e-7,0.0000040760933,0.0074212463,0.9903114,0.00006655636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020449378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006651268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98830235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012490863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017526388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98607355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W130846176","doi":"","title":"The legitimacy of judicial review in South Africa's new constitutional dispensation : insights from the Canadian experience","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Constitution; Justiciability; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Legitimacy; Judicial activism; Bill of rights; Separation of powers; Power (physics); Judicial independence; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.08105821159474702,"score_gpt":0.32022101388525787,"score_spread":0.23916280229051085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W130846176","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09025494,0.08025177,0.00016867621,0.018155249,0.00066000666,0.00044478438,0.00017867582,0.000007622055,0.8098783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99744743,0.0016064949,0.000030353343,0.00025496806,0.00035372545,0.0000040717077,0.0000025704223,0.0000014694583,0.00029892396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880934,0.00014576616,0.0003818645,0.00009133913,0.00044310713,0.00012857915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990188,0.00030663636,0.00022086353,0.000050516304,0.0003044342,0.00009877478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002706415,0.000082462284,0.00018845993,0.00003144188,0.00096316956,0.00007117985,0.0003411306,0.000028565946,0.00036946416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012896363,0.000048182606,0.00006880234,0.00016001979,0.0021277878,0.00017719404,0.00002037262,0.00015079221,0.000025679828],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007532413,0.000026060945,0.0020860806,9.79758e-7,0.000076322875,0.0000042540823,0.09211814,0.000021756081,0.0000069471425,0.9021173,0.0014352198,0.0020316117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039098033,0.000032757413,0.00511336,0.0004578193,0.000032250355,0.0000030840054,0.0222049,0.000021704032,0.0000070479427,0.10399537,0.86762667,0.0001140533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07729814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31035376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90719247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000107841195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056130206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9288462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W131138394","doi":"","title":"‘‘What is a Crime?’: A Theory of the Legislative Response’","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legislator; Political science; Criminal law; Law; Legislature; Public law; Pluralism (philosophy); Philosophy of law; Value pluralism; Normative; Politics; Law and economics; Sociology; Legislation; Epistemology","score_opus":0.017300709620236696,"score_gpt":0.2988049783026434,"score_spread":0.2815042686824067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W131138394","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4951376,0.056591574,0.0015934515,0.12577786,0.0017786173,0.00051880814,0.000005882216,0.00005479978,0.3185414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874453,0.006534493,0.00000557561,0.0008346478,0.0002486932,0.0000010852758,4.4619235e-8,0.0000022092718,0.004927935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797755,0.0005076902,0.00015541015,0.00008848047,0.0003885888,0.0008822698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994562,0.00016659722,0.00012756433,0.00007623005,0.00013743194,0.00003596678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003346142,0.00007118479,0.00011465731,0.00003699143,0.0010406168,0.00004574346,0.00030033893,0.00004360148,0.000043909004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030011137,0.00004594677,0.00014187685,0.00025981982,0.0005181402,0.0002641929,0.000022076218,0.0005980405,0.000009605972],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002018781,0.000027245798,0.00018564206,1.400583e-7,0.000054154392,4.7391418e-7,0.0126889665,6.9648854e-7,0.00012262294,0.96892375,0.00011966247,0.017674793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014405647,0.0001254211,0.0060113436,0.000028010278,0.00002299299,0.000012254913,0.03081785,2.5485787e-7,0.000089012734,0.94225687,0.020432383,0.00005955641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032590196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010085688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4923077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004115432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039687823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80036885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W133036322","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2580849","title":"Fixing Popular Participation in Constitution-Making","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Constitution; Legitimacy; Political science; Law and economics; Simple (philosophy); Majority rule; Democratic legitimacy; Order (exchange); Law; Divergence (linguistics); Economics","score_opus":0.04054630339493686,"score_gpt":0.34959178763558246,"score_spread":0.3090454842406456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W133036322","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82042515,0.008755418,0.006708046,0.00688979,0.0011085166,0.00023073898,0.000001235528,0.000072300165,0.15580882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986358,0.00069199776,0.000032654014,0.00009439601,0.0004242846,0.0000049056734,6.5288043e-7,0.0000022555391,0.00011303886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809897,0.000138121,0.00018709645,0.00009349578,0.00033000152,0.0011523364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996774,0.000028989198,0.00007556001,0.000034780307,0.000112682625,0.00007057469],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023995799,0.00006207582,0.00010126163,0.00007671067,0.0006031823,0.000047104102,0.000112255606,0.00004537982,0.000008379599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061300717,0.000059276095,0.00003809056,0.0002568517,0.00022554658,0.00027302,0.000018504905,0.0005069489,0.000026157128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012501293,0.00002507461,0.04853049,2.836238e-7,0.000015256346,0.0000051028874,0.0017651132,0.00014092837,0.0000039113497,0.944546,0.000036249203,0.00491913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037220473,0.000049546485,0.0022002975,0.000039159306,0.000015501784,0.00001991198,0.022101747,0.000023148585,0.0000028476322,0.9419518,0.033095893,0.00012795154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033734946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07466629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17821069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014982669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042336425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94221866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W138869218","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.999676","title":"Method And Metaphysics: A Legal Historian'S Canon","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Canon; Philosophy; Epistemology; Law; Literature; Political science; Art; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.008995700963953739,"score_gpt":0.2797959075899469,"score_spread":0.27080020662599313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W138869218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03942999,0.033407137,0.33278704,0.025178999,0.0023711745,0.0003325201,0.0000030478468,0.00015201421,0.56633806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932923,0.0024658714,0.0003346281,0.00018174209,0.0015871719,0.0000030986425,2.693687e-7,0.0000047348185,0.002130204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982486,0.00022585773,0.000113389375,0.00011913452,0.00027180757,0.0010212269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963945,0.000086487526,0.00007158519,0.000040220173,0.000081028265,0.00008120395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024112538,0.00007739486,0.00014310313,0.000040278323,0.0011193722,0.000055389522,0.00012194191,0.00003935266,0.00001310625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012560461,0.000066740235,0.00006460561,0.00012094713,0.0002056624,0.00018288117,0.000021912983,0.0005465603,0.0000104975725],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072942894,0.00000907145,0.0002406488,3.516403e-7,0.000057378475,5.1791153e-7,0.0004190663,0.0000021855074,0.00003848957,0.9090383,0.000098199256,0.09008851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011404817,0.000049325576,0.00012260745,0.0000030063961,0.000029351375,0.000016380254,0.0010154366,0.0000041319377,0.0000054075786,0.62346375,0.37511018,0.00006637044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010177843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042578004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9538623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006208296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020225213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99641347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W14063034","doi":"","title":"Foreign Law - a Friend of the Court: An Argument for Prudent Use of International Law in Domestic, Human Rights Related Constitutional Decisions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Suffolk transnational law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Human rights; Supreme court; International human rights law; Political science; Fundamental rights; Municipal law; International law; Sociology","score_opus":0.08173917450153739,"score_gpt":0.3428245931507893,"score_spread":0.2610854186492519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W14063034","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027464498,0.00792384,0.0019518904,0.0108004995,0.0014813027,0.0059481487,0.0022645905,0.000076163225,0.9420891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99793255,0.0003813214,0.0009869576,0.00039176943,0.000035732824,0.00013015812,0.00008504234,0.000004313295,0.000052139523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978564,0.00017146952,0.00073632115,0.00022905668,0.0008182928,0.00018850001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985888,0.00038358822,0.0002293557,0.00014216796,0.0005839297,0.00007217439],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081006356,0.00013570077,0.00032603316,0.00004534647,0.00077991193,0.00001670486,0.00040301363,0.00007809057,0.00045520105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010007045,0.00009969627,0.00022989495,0.00024029761,0.0033004754,0.00039742063,0.000032940094,0.00010480117,0.00000221127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002178963,0.000371286,0.00034045457,0.000040643692,0.000079680656,0.000002060366,0.00041291807,0.000014650532,0.000015242956,0.998612,0.000041227388,0.000048051803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049745146,0.000045482877,0.0018717144,0.00068126316,0.00009806166,0.0000040692576,0.000044165055,0.000005553137,0.000062569656,0.71143097,0.28513357,0.00012514036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005976267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04428279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97046804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011012714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021995232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1417464479","doi":"","title":"Guides: Canadian Legal Research: Constitutional Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitutional law; Political science","score_opus":0.2425523615384947,"score_gpt":0.4164268628215001,"score_spread":0.1738745012830054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1417464479","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000051392662,0.00400745,0.0000081996795,0.025926288,0.0032128925,0.00035173882,0.00052623,0.00010422249,0.96585786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20965497,0.0033983812,0.00057793723,0.014011347,0.024335383,0.00019665576,0.000819513,0.000041919477,0.74696386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99570334,0.0003789176,0.00033799134,0.00042823557,0.002097101,0.0010544072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99647075,0.0003181682,0.00005963105,0.00019672675,0.0020834554,0.00087124936],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031766472,0.00021971365,0.00035007793,0.00032431434,0.0045555416,0.00032467686,0.0007014749,0.00050506514,0.0025112086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016521462,0.00020165458,0.00012395348,0.0005451588,0.017261101,0.0002688654,0.00015288209,0.0007240223,0.0019084101],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017315627,0.0000065459994,0.000017826598,0.0000021510232,0.00002917066,0.00003766422,0.00019757908,6.5637903e-7,5.1058915e-8,0.50834453,0.49123585,0.00012622593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007296169,0.000014924989,0.0000069249973,0.000066788416,0.000014232113,0.0000033322206,0.0026570272,2.546199e-7,4.7341442e-7,0.15191473,0.84502244,0.00022593416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9921763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99490243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35642985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017928722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034461703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W141809283","doi":"10.21991/c90669","title":"JUDGING THE JUDGES: CANADA’S NEWEST SUPREME COURT JUDGE: HON. MICHEL BASTARACHE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Michel foucault; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.04030804881258754,"score_gpt":0.2551855852914567,"score_spread":0.21487753647886915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W141809283","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011454559,0.0054173437,0.02401494,0.09677931,0.008744733,0.0019703289,0.00080578803,0.0005930054,0.85022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890239,0.00023443197,0.0005589887,0.008397333,0.0006649268,0.00014898386,0.00008429634,0.000016633177,0.0008705043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99509186,0.00025293702,0.00083654956,0.0007746401,0.0014616362,0.0015823689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99738836,0.00042481793,0.00031628166,0.0005278919,0.0008406104,0.00050202524],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010372412,0.0005491517,0.00051660667,0.00017818925,0.009072107,0.00017719451,0.0011382834,0.00027019688,0.0012221863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011971185,0.0004550738,0.00031886046,0.00076409616,0.01701828,0.0008843994,0.00037043306,0.00063128717,0.0003346701],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055123222,0.00010873951,0.05898346,0.0000066414073,0.00016380691,0.000051870993,0.00071702356,0.00008093249,0.00002387541,0.8681869,0.07107544,0.00054622104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009698635,0.0000413882,0.009990985,0.00012118926,0.00018300442,0.00012561519,0.023458377,0.00007568429,0.000117592754,0.050466422,0.91352445,0.00092545676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.58368343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81766623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97756934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011592896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016344456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W142126840","doi":"10.29173/alr153","title":"&lt;i&gt;The Negotiable Constitution: On the Limitation of Rights&lt;/i&gt;, Gr&amp;eacute;goire C.N. Webber","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Negotiable instrument; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06788788183739189,"score_gpt":0.2861370335983741,"score_spread":0.21824915176098222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W142126840","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001269746,0.045827676,0.000021650665,0.015696114,0.00042506022,0.00076940935,0.0000079218335,0.000025625935,0.9359568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9520934,0.036159854,0.000085597174,0.0066358577,0.0003222002,0.00015538551,0.000014386206,0.000008027885,0.004525241],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982152,0.00037185854,0.0004025687,0.00023823116,0.00047935886,0.00029281102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982753,0.00085978163,0.00022564262,0.0003383572,0.00022776444,0.00007318386],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008417917,0.0001762455,0.00034526264,0.00001695809,0.001863048,0.000025715783,0.00043995737,0.00007272117,0.0012338811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049740326,0.00009499293,0.00020339948,0.00039274312,0.002539757,0.00019224474,0.00006349443,0.00012611841,0.0011401646],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005063131,0.00005741886,0.000051446117,0.000040637467,0.00007010471,8.224076e-7,0.0009039586,5.1259076e-7,0.000011525491,0.9684178,0.029950079,0.0004905919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007281007,0.000024811434,0.00020469147,0.00088118546,0.00016505831,0.000002507771,0.000046984143,4.362371e-7,0.000022031409,0.03966049,0.95878696,0.00013201365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022422696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07942132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9508237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053947693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018914165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1434237992","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139003926.001","title":"Preface","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Skepticism; Law; Political science; Product (mathematics); Sociology; Constitutional law; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.050448021877567036,"score_gpt":0.2255756443811081,"score_spread":0.17512762250354108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1434237992","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000017719653,0.00035783785,0.00006965232,0.00004321558,0.00035210018,0.00025105273,0.000099347955,0.00013963103,0.99866945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004166938,0.00064578676,0.000018502597,0.000060888473,0.0002975767,4.4254526e-7,0.0000065605504,0.000011979508,0.9947913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903816,0.00003440002,0.000096583106,0.00029156043,0.00029325695,0.00024603656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993585,0.000040845403,0.0001144738,0.00017395536,0.00016950323,0.00014276509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010001347,0.0001905825,0.00023673165,0.00006544936,0.00087245886,0.000022736343,0.00039829343,0.00027379097,0.000033479864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000144196865,0.00022426616,0.00015809626,0.000005958736,0.0012211988,0.00006884165,0.00023492039,0.00024340363,0.000087436725],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023481238,0.0000044556505,0.0000031225597,0.0000056648305,0.00008741379,0.00006532918,0.0003500046,6.1797586e-8,9.371878e-7,0.9655709,0.032842554,0.0010460753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000110919216,0.000013836551,0.000019399542,0.000060841456,0.00011423829,7.7976523e-7,0.00013813959,1.0091753e-7,0.000009189325,0.0007380344,0.99853545,0.00025904746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008818218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021055854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96569294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019562096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030013928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W144651318","doi":"","title":"Reflections: On Judicial Diversity and Judicial Independence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial independence; Impartiality; Judicial discretion; Judicial activism; Political science; Legitimacy; Law; Judicial review; Judicial opinion; Independence (probability theory); Diversity (politics); Context (archaeology); Separation of powers; Politics; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0635851478675194,"score_gpt":0.3551902178925211,"score_spread":0.2916050700250017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W144651318","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38830495,0.000017990824,0.00004559833,0.0024667457,0.0008573553,0.00008209804,0.0000021637077,0.00006923205,0.6081539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99775547,0.00008667889,0.000080687496,0.0008720417,0.0008213014,0.0000035718394,2.9601395e-7,0.0000015807486,0.0003783455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917454,0.000033169676,0.00007149161,0.0001661241,0.00037869217,0.00017596273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996682,0.00008429791,0.000025519565,0.00005126376,0.000086217166,0.00008453003],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031003635,0.00006162425,0.00008217943,0.000045396853,0.005810541,0.000027368844,0.00011317318,0.000095713774,0.00027677813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028563096,0.00005626029,0.00002716427,0.00016809259,0.0008433443,0.00012622456,0.00024857896,0.00023537362,0.00006734625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017177797,0.000029595327,0.018276416,2.963722e-7,0.000008792501,0.000002747335,0.002689501,1.9181189e-7,0.000110969544,0.97533804,0.0006529389,0.0028733136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043361433,0.00013532677,0.27432868,0.000014270749,0.000039261675,0.0000035192083,0.0068376292,0.0000027367323,0.00014914811,0.5731135,0.14457075,0.00037157626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045766838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.123729646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6094505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026646283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010063922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99548376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W145749697","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Stephen Gardbaum, 'The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism: Theory and Practice'","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Commonwealth; Constitutional theory; Political science; Legislature; Constitution; Scholarship; Law; Parliamentary sovereignty; Judicial review; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Subject (documents); Sovereignty; Sociology; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.03862496162319138,"score_gpt":0.3327595589332644,"score_spread":0.294134597310073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W145749697","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000049971477,0.22791366,0.0031583444,0.15878443,0.00007472306,0.00056518475,0.0000062637546,0.000028938004,0.60941845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18243639,0.38456413,0.0025075015,0.37304318,0.00055029703,0.000118379576,0.0000062033305,0.00001088322,0.056763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998918,0.00031722683,0.00019485172,0.00010726497,0.00031259874,0.00015006667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984979,0.0009859601,0.000105869745,0.00009373043,0.00022438886,0.00009217117],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012422526,0.00006919761,0.00015843121,0.000012597765,0.0006195541,0.000025106856,0.00014079257,0.000032350406,0.0011770416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011503351,0.000043554915,0.000039634957,0.000088296605,0.0017563006,0.0003185321,0.00006619281,0.00007415915,0.000062357736],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049293126,0.000009419134,0.000020559224,0.0000074418394,0.000015594016,8.917223e-8,0.00046930747,0.0000040971227,0.0000026214989,0.57458043,0.4241456,0.0007398887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008985575,0.000009509031,0.00009892841,0.000091639,0.000047405963,0.000002074228,0.0017933205,0.000020016598,0.0000021754004,0.13340206,0.86437553,0.00006750149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0109754875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049810385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55265546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026315243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062837946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W145826137","doi":"10.7202/1058125ar","title":"Will There Be a Science of Law in the Twenty-First Century?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Polity; Liberalism; Law; Legal science; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.01721302842834343,"score_gpt":0.2598059833284677,"score_spread":0.24259295490012428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W145826137","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58379674,0.00035423075,0.0000030614244,0.004026284,0.0001492456,0.00019031116,0.0000051818847,0.000010139712,0.41146478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989601,0.00034743393,0.000029676756,0.00038360577,0.00011566422,0.0000092814635,6.238113e-7,0.000002240259,0.0001513856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990787,0.00004668945,0.0001237042,0.00014627149,0.00033143212,0.00027319827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960625,0.00010550351,0.000056047495,0.00013512147,0.000061001934,0.000036103233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078159315,0.000043910604,0.00011798561,0.000035896817,0.000396607,0.000032282896,0.00045134115,0.000034844266,0.00006995663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009280026,0.00004307347,0.00005134461,0.00046193704,0.0011166307,0.00023557796,0.000052851054,0.00008747869,0.000035269677],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041530666,0.000035707606,0.017671544,0.000008834693,0.0000034028003,0.0000033731415,0.008186273,0.000015298689,0.00008075138,0.97370875,0.000031065825,0.0002508454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006070171,0.000112498936,0.102238245,0.00036557333,0.00003173927,0.000010153693,0.03018075,0.00003568369,0.00018448476,0.5216226,0.34422082,0.00039041173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008366152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011474117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45208615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012417116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015982299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99823725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1482197541","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100010012","title":"David Rayside Queer Inclusions, Continental Divisions: Public Recognition of Sexual Diversity in Canada and the United States. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2008, 388 p.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Diversity (politics); Gender studies; Media studies; Political science; History; Sociology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.01978859783635975,"score_gpt":0.23369050411030087,"score_spread":0.21390190627394112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1482197541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98296165,0.006672321,0.00000895757,0.004699833,0.00017013478,0.00017539434,0.00027736407,0.0000023696987,0.005031946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902585,0.00866306,0.000029370634,0.00090103503,0.00005004047,2.7674025e-7,0.000017501514,0.0000027603185,0.0000774131],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894,0.0001902117,0.000270912,0.00012239948,0.0001617277,0.0003147828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985814,0.0002332173,0.00025864257,0.00006959464,0.0003817753,0.00047537507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009071132,0.00009863486,0.00032562076,0.00001186332,0.0011507884,0.000021241854,0.00021456393,0.00007782212,0.00007328378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016744126,0.0000951446,0.000077160905,0.000083503306,0.000989951,0.00036599048,0.00006548568,0.00016679226,3.6824297e-8],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016717584,0.00007795694,0.03354272,0.00006741856,0.0005254057,0.00015244818,0.35945684,0.000059856167,0.000017264078,0.5808387,0.012428297,0.012665923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0053132093,0.00027765433,0.15085804,0.00038093954,0.00037025107,0.000037426908,0.6816725,0.00016024389,0.0000041637886,0.030794067,0.12953506,0.0005964546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9998766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99998724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5500446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020331095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025410315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.885105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1482326114","doi":"10.21991/c9k088","title":"THE INDEPENDENCE AND IMPARTIALITY OF PROVINCIAL COURT JUDGES: RAPPORTEUR’S COMMENTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Independence (probability theory); Law; Political science; Judicial independence; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.047623515810483394,"score_gpt":0.28810369190912355,"score_spread":0.24048017609864014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1482326114","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10197149,0.006558357,0.029577054,0.023190763,0.005810762,0.0031727417,0.0007485286,0.00042098167,0.8285493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99816465,0.0005513754,0.00026314243,0.0006205604,0.00016152013,0.00009059718,0.000015379886,0.0000051613742,0.00012761734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970962,0.00018366335,0.00068037165,0.0004079254,0.00089205825,0.0007397919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998211,0.00029573348,0.00033135092,0.00026434462,0.00063113385,0.0002663921],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012853191,0.00026456272,0.00034775434,0.0000973447,0.005361521,0.00007948509,0.0004890701,0.00020253705,0.00016738322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00090540195,0.00021112345,0.00016585001,0.00033333476,0.027189668,0.0005826398,0.0003000656,0.00028816643,0.000045583365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010578249,0.00011622046,0.13581519,0.00000627383,0.000095758034,0.000008782048,0.0006304292,0.0000028195536,0.00002335634,0.8589688,0.002520648,0.00170597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002476114,0.00023197813,0.045078233,0.00021755723,0.00025588006,0.00012072069,0.032647718,0.00006504408,0.0005897708,0.494208,0.42303795,0.0010710192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005422718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007803517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89619315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017645484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028817635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99593335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1484726770","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139003926.011","title":"Vagueness, Finiteness, and the Limits of Interpretation and Construction","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Vagueness; Political science; Fundamental rights; Law; Legitimacy; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitution; Duty; Judicial interpretation; Charter; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Bill of rights; Substantive due process; Politics; Human rights; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03313308379269255,"score_gpt":0.21806935502611136,"score_spread":0.1849362712334188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1484726770","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00092796475,0.0010385296,0.00017697099,0.00005903908,0.0001656047,0.00021668684,0.000043447253,0.000020005098,0.99735177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46729708,0.005716395,0.000055133456,0.00005740174,0.00014033235,0.0000012409228,0.000006133919,0.00000960054,0.5267167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994576,0.000056790606,0.000101813246,0.00016047506,0.00013824976,0.00008509175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994176,0.00014084345,0.00016417982,0.00007551095,0.00016185018,0.000040023482],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001428527,0.00010978179,0.0002151738,0.00004838741,0.00047780728,0.000016901884,0.00011212342,0.00013365551,0.0000020161995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030650917,0.00009591587,0.000053671283,0.000006487306,0.0042576944,0.00006876631,0.00010718685,0.00011322337,6.9171983e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015446414,0.0000015772112,0.000032990465,0.000016670685,0.00007423049,0.0000037397424,0.0008684431,7.416971e-8,0.0000013577187,0.9916018,0.00019276456,0.0070518623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013050704,0.00004336445,0.00070491433,0.0004023128,0.000683244,0.000009242214,0.0019687824,0.000010246588,0.00005156601,0.017555194,0.97686476,0.00040132916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004811462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014069761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.976672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028627894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000099626464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1485750150","doi":"","title":"Judicial Review, Charter Politics, and Federalism in Canada -- The American Influences","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Charter; Political science; Legislature; Politics; Law; Judicial review; Constitutionalism; Separation of powers; Fundamental rights; Context (archaeology); Democracy; Law and economics; Human rights; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.00855822107869351,"score_gpt":0.25695044335212863,"score_spread":0.24839222227343513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1485750150","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8709444,0.026693791,0.0000062094646,0.0959649,0.00017774591,0.00019742781,0.000001451399,0.0000061964347,0.0060078786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92006963,0.07410286,0.000001817605,0.0053796154,0.00032967326,0.0000101634905,2.0111263e-7,0.0000023063867,0.00010374149],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981107,0.00014541244,0.00017899982,0.00008938625,0.00030521132,0.0011702541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996335,0.00007056312,0.00010498438,0.000039247883,0.00008332083,0.00006841238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070805574,0.000073485055,0.00015738166,0.000022233593,0.000958134,0.000055476576,0.00017092108,0.000011491769,0.000031970863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012863812,0.000048537764,0.000026943906,0.00016921386,0.00051325996,0.00013171253,0.000023901888,0.0005469788,0.000008789222],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003465047,0.000010966728,0.101795524,0.0000041837493,0.000063639105,0.0000035411515,0.0009407574,8.823797e-7,0.000005461547,0.86249197,0.0034740928,0.031205514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015377263,0.000054772794,0.2219725,0.00011820002,0.000023894794,0.000038706898,0.027063131,0.0000024474418,8.974014e-7,0.7096688,0.040709347,0.0001934881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9937875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15282314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010391157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008168749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1485831801","doi":"10.21991/c9kh3j","title":"A Democratic Defence of the Court Challenges Program","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Disadvantaged; Parliament; Political science; Public administration; Law; Democracy; Government (linguistics); Politics","score_opus":0.06703664203223589,"score_gpt":0.2888507386046461,"score_spread":0.22181409657241022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1485831801","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009849576,0.0065919794,0.0071113855,0.015232736,0.0034450125,0.0019501679,0.00014261682,0.00038452845,0.955292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967889,0.00075522735,0.001386348,0.0004692286,0.00015428578,0.00021143397,0.0000060125453,0.000006505611,0.0002220544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971655,0.00017541782,0.00059187977,0.00043037336,0.00087744626,0.00075936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983495,0.0001756385,0.000298299,0.00035925492,0.0006126905,0.00020462913],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005452658,0.00028656813,0.00036759517,0.000121800695,0.00319319,0.000033414424,0.00076499785,0.00020140385,0.00024031849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008502162,0.00022227863,0.00033962668,0.00057941914,0.024256464,0.0004814943,0.0002671672,0.0002659947,0.000091636415],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003434579,0.0003022597,0.022747613,0.000014853936,0.000098872784,0.0000068664162,0.00087448047,0.000017283897,0.00002600573,0.97073376,0.0014413511,0.003702284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012104616,0.00017448452,0.02112876,0.0005590245,0.00023305116,0.0001111644,0.018713526,0.0000642451,0.0005577429,0.686112,0.27028063,0.00085494167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015642302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039521526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9869393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018889176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027801946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1487630027","doi":"10.29173/mlj741","title":"Precedent Unbound - Contemporary Approaches to Precedent in Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Epistemology; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.11642084257986385,"score_gpt":0.2493470459688753,"score_spread":0.13292620338901145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1487630027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5920404,0.0007699167,0.000046608864,0.0049033766,0.0008957393,0.00023800143,0.0000072558423,0.000013740745,0.40108493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99852,0.000021111919,0.00006252648,0.0003485787,0.0009403923,0.000014811122,0.0000015115832,0.000004822871,0.00008623625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855834,0.00012307445,0.00028806634,0.0001407107,0.00055819884,0.00033159443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999618,0.000052796062,0.00007816619,0.00005496592,0.00005490879,0.00014118907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004151815,0.00010083505,0.00015902903,0.00004239738,0.0011345658,0.00015082619,0.00022466353,0.000032897067,0.000050562554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030009995,0.00009188191,0.000041540476,0.00018101378,0.00015803346,0.00015900997,0.000055748973,0.00017630316,0.000018659173],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005814277,0.00014831898,0.27725038,0.000005597641,0.00004823428,0.00018955865,0.0016189929,0.00072986045,0.000011202201,0.69571745,0.018769417,0.0054528476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006658444,0.000060868835,0.28537676,0.00011757999,0.000017666755,0.00003823383,0.10736363,0.000009081689,0.000093314986,0.07481963,0.53094774,0.00048961584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99925554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6208978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013851402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014429069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87262774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1487871244","doi":"","title":"Sexual Violence and \"Fundamental Justice\": On the Failure of Equity Reforms to Criminal Proceedings","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Sexual violence; Criminology; Criminal justice; Political science; Psychology; Law and economics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.04347658840632447,"score_gpt":0.3114686701813665,"score_spread":0.267992081775042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1487871244","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9496001,0.00024210317,7.857451e-8,0.0050787753,0.00008320809,0.00019957409,0.000026157135,0.000012516105,0.044757515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99681926,0.00031358577,0.000012137471,0.0021776743,0.00017214869,0.000060984086,2.9690568e-7,0.000003197335,0.00044073927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896884,0.000014089145,0.0001238404,0.00018120433,0.00027716023,0.0004348736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948454,0.00006973635,0.00002997455,0.000047037454,0.00012321291,0.00024548985],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032662193,0.00010585422,0.00016580813,0.0000524683,0.0016240187,0.000036934718,0.00016913057,0.00003125315,0.00013875033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022165572,0.0000708898,0.000016931912,0.00022444184,0.0011042666,0.00007914659,0.00006397063,0.00008191176,0.000028797269],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063609885,0.00003495402,0.0037968871,0.000071410104,0.0001827863,0.000009961179,0.19126745,0.000003301904,0.000052260817,0.77281356,0.0031543104,0.028549531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000099746416,0.00025537948,0.0045703696,0.00015680211,0.000046933033,0.0000013372781,0.9455536,5.0919e-7,0.000018829327,0.024781445,0.024338394,0.00017665178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016604368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14525779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75428617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053156406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025734046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1489197754","doi":"","title":"Is Substantive Equality a Constitutional Doctrine","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Political science; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.03015495902080766,"score_gpt":0.32675556533624345,"score_spread":0.2966006063154358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1489197754","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27998468,0.02302289,0.026600858,0.09204031,0.0010809887,0.00045405293,0.000044990098,0.00019642574,0.5765748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891871,0.0067811063,0.000074790245,0.0007076153,0.0015314086,0.0000037762074,0.0000013356848,0.0000027593742,0.0017100732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730927,0.00012492521,0.00023694287,0.00015673594,0.00054841826,0.0016237037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994322,0.00006925206,0.00010828999,0.00005676823,0.0002280164,0.000105443105],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002098502,0.0001066725,0.00014993931,0.000060035938,0.0017367845,0.000056850924,0.00021360331,0.00006262001,0.00034694435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014429858,0.000095055264,0.00012766168,0.00025994613,0.0013810457,0.00030192581,0.000029013123,0.0008234862,0.00021343993],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040952706,0.000047969468,0.0032492706,3.4661164e-7,0.00010262187,0.000001445734,0.00096653687,0.0000046557757,0.000012997038,0.98563844,0.0003617753,0.009572999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042060143,0.000039936844,0.0010009875,0.000009740639,0.000025675312,0.00004944499,0.0051661558,0.0000030075498,0.00002836236,0.70491904,0.28818622,0.00015084182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012246664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020546716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70920247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067717866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1489382342","doi":"","title":"Bring in the Friendly Hand: The Effects of Judicial Inaction on Democratic Policymaking in Immigration Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Democracy; Political science; Law; Immigration law; Immigration policy; Law and economics; Immigration reform; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.007605430139763334,"score_gpt":0.276101440286716,"score_spread":0.2684960101469527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1489382342","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9674882,0.0006686211,0.0007198012,0.0053041093,0.00025815063,0.00019818534,1.4959707e-7,0.0000056284534,0.025357101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99861795,0.0005389752,0.0000019422212,0.0003053889,0.0005091261,0.000006798667,2.0281092e-7,0.0000026287344,0.000016969643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830955,0.0004556024,0.00018567972,0.00007797349,0.0003259336,0.0006452482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937665,0.00041280212,0.00011554562,0.000049363323,0.00003219769,0.000013412731],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025916006,0.00006554024,0.00010889876,0.00006803812,0.0008642452,0.000043702927,0.00016572239,0.000039593397,0.0000010812631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037955868,0.000040377665,0.000047190537,0.00029811237,0.00026733716,0.00012221227,0.000011318486,0.00068018644,0.000002960181],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020414618,0.000029901053,0.0016881105,0.0000018199001,0.000010531688,5.982581e-7,0.003648183,0.000026052872,0.00017187007,0.9871579,0.000009053153,0.007235565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041495205,0.00031561137,0.017689155,0.00011349346,0.000019354344,0.000010424057,0.017137365,0.00004139728,0.00014980276,0.96254617,0.0014754902,0.000086768785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041207984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48231134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44110334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062495016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004973623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9651767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1489450614","doi":"10.21991/c9nd5w","title":"The Truth About Canadian Judicial Activism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial activism; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Scrutiny; Legislature; Judicial review; Deference; Parliament; Economic Justice; Judicial deference; Judicial independence; Judicial restraint; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.038149313754194385,"score_gpt":0.2667368051314889,"score_spread":0.2285874913772945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1489450614","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028295408,0.002505394,0.006357361,0.012561744,0.009163173,0.00074780965,0.00025171338,0.00029129488,0.965292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99634236,0.0006297141,0.0002398435,0.0013914246,0.00072181557,0.00015649252,0.00003148157,0.00001112656,0.00047576588],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99616414,0.00017832068,0.00059046317,0.00055577944,0.0008615167,0.0016497622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99755025,0.00054300943,0.00019809756,0.00034929538,0.00060490525,0.00075442914],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008572761,0.00038025854,0.0003425303,0.00025111818,0.016617665,0.00022073918,0.0008167222,0.0002902173,0.0006317746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017826123,0.00031457766,0.0003066743,0.0006812212,0.024372522,0.0007595141,0.00015541667,0.0004431516,0.0008408171],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005844827,0.000058827238,0.010620282,0.000001702339,0.00012249916,0.000037034304,0.0005564699,0.000009386609,0.000005680255,0.97771925,0.0072291233,0.003581294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050764246,0.00003459741,0.004924351,0.00006249889,0.00006189468,0.000045728273,0.007093938,0.000014316903,0.000043102464,0.23156697,0.7551645,0.00048047988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20600602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46111384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9935128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008026328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00975091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1491038314","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2005.00054.x","title":"TIPPINS AND WITTMANN ASKED THE WRONG QUESTION:. Evaluators May Not be \"Experts,\" But They Can Express Best Interests Opinions","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Psychology; Child custody; Best interests; Family law; Law; Process (computing); Reliability (semiconductor); Resolution (logic); Social psychology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.08894869586451364,"score_gpt":0.3804127153912334,"score_spread":0.29146401952671974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491038314","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050494634,0.34417462,0.000053654454,0.5229594,0.0013807135,0.0020509593,0.0001542527,0.00017724723,0.07855448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76381177,0.22523928,0.00007785668,0.0092215035,0.0007065157,0.00013504075,0.000011059506,0.000008424633,0.0007885631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998175,0.00040404242,0.0003055067,0.00027226054,0.00054102566,0.00030212625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915063,0.00021692437,0.00010764954,0.00021553999,0.0001786593,0.00013057164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010675563,0.00017795303,0.00031324546,0.00002656089,0.0012404667,0.000075083444,0.0003353152,0.000066150096,0.000077127035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039011618,0.000118417905,0.00010233133,0.0001514894,0.00070145616,0.00015029556,0.00013220083,0.00015404094,0.00006697373],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024144721,0.0002620587,0.006247035,0.00030511385,0.0002710484,0.0000127585845,0.0150205055,0.000014302386,0.000074732074,0.59546053,0.19850828,0.18379949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010342575,0.000026103944,0.005565616,0.0017839797,0.000090583584,0.0000032084902,0.0022031919,0.000008083973,0.0000025615705,0.00043519182,0.9895982,0.00017984035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009401503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01792238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79108995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012607116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028271947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1491474467","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1742996","title":"Tapping Reeve, Coverture, and America's First Legal Treatise","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Tapping; Psychology; Political science; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.01790159148250894,"score_gpt":0.24637954877686727,"score_spread":0.22847795729435832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491474467","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1881187,0.030167218,0.008132783,0.009368311,0.000799892,0.0003319195,0.000008394724,0.00013563961,0.7629371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97662437,0.021171192,0.00007697397,0.00019693488,0.00038774457,0.0000034465957,4.153681e-7,0.0000046614964,0.0015342706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983801,0.000057765043,0.00013196722,0.00012270975,0.00022270932,0.0010847047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996823,0.00004304882,0.00008071483,0.000042930293,0.00006226975,0.00008872683],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004875104,0.000088128625,0.00012933857,0.000043916076,0.0014630455,0.00004756641,0.00013365303,0.00004382472,0.00006482043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011537174,0.00007485996,0.000054139837,0.00016065795,0.00043614535,0.00023932647,0.00002959137,0.00050211785,0.00001995114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030296202,0.000029977424,0.007171199,7.331946e-7,0.00009288161,0.0000074897002,0.0025114592,4.770459e-7,0.000004881382,0.9667958,0.00033571475,0.02301908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041016715,0.0002199241,0.010031441,0.000028146262,0.00006129344,0.00011518599,0.016844088,0.000004187776,0.000006259036,0.6978113,0.2742307,0.00023732737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02059501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053523008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7885057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035405502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012246652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1491901897","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1107","title":"So What is the Real Legacy of Oakes?: Two Decades of Proportionality Analysis under the Canadian Charter’s Section 1","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Deference; Supreme court; Adjudication; Law; Political science; Proportionality (law); Context (archaeology); Sociology; History","score_opus":0.0420602414364565,"score_gpt":0.3336171573435262,"score_spread":0.2915569159070697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491901897","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07389379,0.3372896,0.0001665412,0.2928941,0.0010659867,0.002900593,0.00017384518,0.00006880761,0.29154673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9671223,0.030889822,0.000008184815,0.0015654531,0.00024227184,0.000025967413,0.000013385526,0.0000026052032,0.00013000154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851143,0.0002452346,0.00037006452,0.00014883582,0.00053480593,0.00018962378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990793,0.00008438704,0.00021451931,0.00018972682,0.00038543995,0.000046629193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013636476,0.00008824266,0.00029007837,0.000030128516,0.0012626332,0.00008401941,0.00023088853,0.000038985756,0.00032882302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028661454,0.00005057537,0.00025315312,0.00072947366,0.0014305289,0.00027420535,0.000021719867,0.00008682571,0.0000076670685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017286133,0.000022514718,0.006619164,0.00005686185,0.00021436853,3.4072252e-7,0.00034645965,0.000014168902,0.0000055606683,0.98994005,0.0016493705,0.0011294315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000088957735,0.00001413449,0.062006075,0.0005655227,0.001217771,9.14032e-7,0.0015662941,0.000006645864,0.000037637303,0.043413304,0.89092636,0.00015640698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9194801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97857106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9465267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012683196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006063791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97112817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493510671","doi":"","title":"What Roles for the Judiciary in Aiding 'Vulnerable People'?: Contending Views in the American and Canadian Supreme Courts","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Legislature; Democracy; Supreme court; Constitution; Duty; Economic Justice; Politics","score_opus":0.023623604402048446,"score_gpt":0.2889459726985016,"score_spread":0.2653223682964531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1493510671","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9178763,0.023196783,0.000108310596,0.055857163,0.00029741385,0.00057282066,0.000001902864,0.0000059763984,0.002083298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9692964,0.029198367,0.0000048717648,0.0011300917,0.00023220263,0.0000886256,5.692693e-7,0.000004331668,0.00004451731],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784213,0.0002720209,0.00017694633,0.000112303365,0.00022211554,0.0013744832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992169,0.0005335051,0.000093889765,0.000050251612,0.000045897457,0.000059513135],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044071116,0.00008294715,0.00016102738,0.00009672223,0.0027103939,0.00023708498,0.00027684902,0.000020435391,0.000026380754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021543704,0.000052087795,0.00004646411,0.0002821446,0.00027762665,0.00039338044,0.000020910513,0.00083010946,0.0000023929158],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019443245,0.00002946799,0.07262263,0.0000011710953,0.000063882995,0.0000031804545,0.023215977,0.00006802019,0.000023181092,0.86101055,0.00052144926,0.042421035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002649698,0.00007893253,0.05890209,0.000028659928,0.000017451473,0.00002968813,0.40934846,0.00008460798,6.551483e-7,0.50994736,0.02117094,0.00012616786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7582284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99168473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38613248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008784134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017234886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99858797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W149426997","doi":"10.21991/c93x06","title":"JUDICIAL REVIEW IN THE NEW HONG KONG: PROPHECIES AND PORTENTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.061022954876434284,"score_gpt":0.2913992043137709,"score_spread":0.23037624943733664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W149426997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056938645,0.05384942,0.0071698907,0.06220925,0.0026176053,0.0028354912,0.00011609417,0.00025153556,0.86525685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844652,0.008125715,0.00039842766,0.0062973946,0.00033487653,0.000106480795,0.000021955639,0.0000058834084,0.00024409914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970294,0.0001951295,0.0006290868,0.00049222173,0.00084757654,0.00080653216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989097,0.00016585826,0.00018881232,0.0002420316,0.00024669123,0.00024691713],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000984132,0.00031473674,0.00042273817,0.00016886531,0.0027002944,0.000088222114,0.00053741643,0.00016239629,0.0003771368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00093576784,0.00024516432,0.00017397928,0.00075923384,0.011510518,0.00073370343,0.00017550943,0.0003442069,0.00013847959],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028799232,0.00010519055,0.035244506,0.000024189329,0.000040931576,0.000051864034,0.0008443182,0.000002009922,0.0000052905066,0.94709253,0.0144632645,0.0020971312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015032623,0.00010180151,0.02712226,0.0018521395,0.00021796694,0.00028300312,0.014000848,0.000008214332,0.000020621552,0.35001707,0.6039728,0.0009000238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061114985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005921326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9787713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016066586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028470093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1497961817","doi":"","title":"Thick Instrumentalism and Comparative Constitutionalism: The Case of Gay Rights","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Instrumentalism; Scholarship; Political science; Framing (construction); Law; Sociology; Mainstream; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Politics; Democracy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04590341195432154,"score_gpt":0.3101113995582699,"score_spread":0.26420798760394837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1497961817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9395321,0.0051857745,0.00017597112,0.0027570976,0.00018068177,0.000120108736,0.000006538852,0.000010214364,0.05203151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957354,0.0036885345,0.000020161548,0.000089412715,0.00021768827,0.0000026562286,5.8372945e-7,0.0000010640343,0.00024449793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877864,0.00015301933,0.00016799089,0.000085846266,0.00021605515,0.00059845246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995663,0.000112352755,0.00010721375,0.000040522064,0.00012279705,0.000050781186],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078958867,0.00007413718,0.00013669599,0.00003157779,0.0032853505,0.000016533699,0.000112888156,0.000037286034,0.000026200185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003295771,0.000047094007,0.000051917716,0.00013535109,0.0029338498,0.00014444161,0.00002756826,0.0005029964,0.000005942801],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012778369,0.000021880316,0.0009903497,3.6439084e-7,0.00009040721,0.00004793122,0.0047850637,0.0000023294278,0.000009595258,0.9936473,0.00013083169,0.00026116316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004144634,0.00007667345,0.0007424767,0.00001390357,0.00003844872,0.008904751,0.033073355,0.000003240135,0.000047723544,0.9366621,0.019912668,0.00011021561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015614795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052155294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056985226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023328175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019881788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1498821330","doi":"10.21991/c9zq18","title":"Sometimes Constitutions are Made in the Streets: the Future of the Charter’s Notwithstanding Clause","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Legislature; Charter; Political science; Parliament; Law; Constitution; Law and economics; Politics; Order (exchange); Constitutional law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.04098074569533218,"score_gpt":0.2691496057889388,"score_spread":0.22816886009360665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1498821330","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0736086,0.015836855,0.012382474,0.1485515,0.013932366,0.0056806984,0.0016989346,0.00037085003,0.72793776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961414,0.00050582335,0.0001403347,0.0023592599,0.0005089092,0.00017390102,0.0000139157855,0.0000075324447,0.00014893102],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961015,0.0004809792,0.00081967365,0.0004836229,0.001177622,0.0009366124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784434,0.00048475663,0.00047985665,0.00062312174,0.00043198885,0.00013595528],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001286268,0.00039721534,0.00043984473,0.00021116044,0.006568507,0.000115457355,0.0015726476,0.00026107204,0.00028708603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006331508,0.00022275465,0.00042381042,0.0014845887,0.029755348,0.0006601263,0.00029573712,0.0006812038,0.00007251713],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044867244,0.00018669898,0.096996844,0.000008117173,0.000087982524,0.000015361418,0.00270512,0.000057445224,0.00002303258,0.89640605,0.0031580115,0.0003104397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018166393,0.0000738354,0.06831331,0.0006458823,0.00028936157,0.00020022294,0.19842827,0.00004199678,0.00020312573,0.28382823,0.44528133,0.00087777444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024901875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017889868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9225328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031460632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026706401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W149979645","doi":"10.1007/978-3-322-80409-9_16","title":"Der Beitrag der kanadischen Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit zur Integration nationaler Minderheiten","year":2002,"lang":"de","type":"book-chapter","venue":"VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.03560796818584716,"score_gpt":0.2731514194762869,"score_spread":0.23754345129043974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W149979645","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017587177,0.005568596,0.00038659287,0.0045964033,0.0045321956,0.0018814395,0.00032194398,0.00032564986,0.9806285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61002517,0.0010681705,0.0005564385,0.0023000904,0.0061216913,0.00017758751,0.00033172398,0.00021735996,0.37920177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99161583,0.00032509514,0.0017270589,0.0018829132,0.0028146743,0.0016344439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99531037,0.0006333422,0.0010199111,0.00079334487,0.0014059007,0.0008371096],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095681124,0.0016786889,0.0016922044,0.0007010813,0.003431714,0.0004925144,0.0010203338,0.0018141909,0.004268622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040566732,0.0016692359,0.0011156206,0.00026423708,0.0029114,0.00044751767,0.00041787885,0.0016197679,0.005825825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029537713,0.00015392873,0.00028059713,0.000055899094,0.0029219228,0.0002986091,0.0070497007,0.00002095126,0.00028453066,0.9560085,0.01950097,0.013129046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012012154,0.00026898884,0.0013581939,0.0007509223,0.0022407018,0.000042256113,0.0011700233,0.00016226443,0.00016434604,0.058147896,0.9318579,0.0026352971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065052165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009175064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9123569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000836783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009598214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500276302","doi":"10.5040/9781474200127","title":"Gender and Judging","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Objectivity (philosophy); Blindness; Gender studies; Gender relations; Sociology; Political science; Sociological research; Geography; Social science; Epistemology; Optometry","score_opus":0.05771760461099727,"score_gpt":0.2674381270658975,"score_spread":0.2097205224549002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1500276302","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000068713794,0.0010122476,0.000019261464,0.00089460565,0.00068933587,0.00022892022,0.000014725345,0.00015698983,0.9969152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017182982,0.00009027024,0.00010338866,0.0013129478,0.0024473297,0.000037120273,0.000019158206,0.000020913734,0.9787859],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985218,0.000058621485,0.00018827038,0.0003167469,0.00055401755,0.00036052728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992421,0.00014206633,0.00011960969,0.0001202938,0.00021102943,0.00016485761],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056517846,0.00018106804,0.0002493623,0.000105298066,0.0012836707,0.0019985999,0.00028377256,0.0003201696,0.0002691697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032740267,0.00017338111,0.00007520837,0.000026675409,0.0008171998,0.0007062203,0.00021820639,0.00044432838,0.00012479951],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.779116e-7,0.0000018013723,0.00004100486,0.000008180387,0.000032903306,0.0000038218404,0.0020922753,3.762569e-8,0.0000012337363,0.673537,0.3180267,0.006254376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053928827,0.0000031546112,0.00015302151,0.000061545696,0.00002439266,0.0000011124721,0.00043618985,5.5769686e-7,5.4327023e-7,0.18004039,0.8190438,0.00018133596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003301654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008827919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50101715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001689066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010630827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99903744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500302751","doi":"","title":"HABERMAS’IN İLETİŞİMSEL EYLEM KURAMI’NDA HUKUK","year":2014,"lang":"tr","type":"article","venue":"DergiPark (Istanbul University)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics","score_opus":0.013109857157003335,"score_gpt":0.21682778232636402,"score_spread":0.2037179251693607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1500302751","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1895307,0.00070216885,0.00027698054,0.0057958914,0.0011888811,0.00035453233,0.000054040203,0.00014447,0.80195236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97702587,0.0011976308,0.0001335387,0.00039851933,0.0004951056,0.0000015184488,0.000011902303,0.000017614158,0.020718284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967031,0.0004339186,0.0003803373,0.00076264987,0.0007427668,0.0009772333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848753,0.00039754756,0.0002298053,0.00028281135,0.00027143417,0.00033089845],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006457662,0.000401442,0.0005859453,0.00040043113,0.0017574445,0.00014188945,0.00085594266,0.00031927682,0.0005736192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023485643,0.00047528357,0.00027520992,0.0019090592,0.0018370781,0.00048452223,0.00034743926,0.00045645927,0.00064382365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014431495,0.0002447692,0.018711366,0.000029635145,0.00012895952,0.00021365173,0.00510658,0.00009212048,0.00002811622,0.9656367,0.0078147445,0.0018490715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011183118,0.00008955309,0.018400325,0.00013440367,0.00012192261,0.000002565604,0.016689213,0.00010661443,0.000018064744,0.009308814,0.9533886,0.0006216699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011693531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021854822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95632786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00074186997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045606712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500640283","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1031","title":"Ifs and Buts in Charter Adjudication: The Unruly Emergence of Constitutional Exemptions in Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Charter; Political science; Law; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.04548538059424122,"score_gpt":0.2817187433131049,"score_spread":0.2362333627188637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1500640283","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01389586,0.5309972,0.000053399257,0.12062879,0.00064072135,0.0014857837,0.00012289906,0.0000210125,0.33215433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89287937,0.10575184,0.000012838318,0.0012317903,0.00004164544,0.000042398085,0.000002195642,0.0000010134023,0.00003693817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990631,0.000106406966,0.00027140765,0.00012056128,0.000286226,0.00015233914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996434,0.00008490346,0.000062009036,0.000084479296,0.000085705404,0.00003953367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036497953,0.00006347326,0.00017785297,0.000014661653,0.00026797305,0.0000052241817,0.00013516829,0.000018926565,0.0008459381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001122694,0.00004880615,0.000025782048,0.0002974987,0.001129687,0.00010860124,0.000028881,0.000079893485,0.000013779616],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.935498e-7,0.000021697628,0.01935743,0.000048575228,0.0000063180323,0.000002194068,0.00022198443,0.0000020088107,0.0000017014771,0.9743088,0.0046806014,0.0013481253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001753033,0.000006779062,0.027974106,0.0015106557,0.000023471872,0.0000036680851,0.0005097768,0.000013933447,0.00000178835,0.0078112404,0.9618201,0.00014917178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.734524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.969913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96649754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000089992136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046093986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92624295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500693252","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100010279","title":"Allan Hutchinson The Province of Jurisprudence Democratized. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, 240 p.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Political science; Media studies; Library science; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.010975582864604573,"score_gpt":0.23777698154108706,"score_spread":0.2268013986764825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1500693252","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8569919,0.0012077751,0.000114470895,0.012061451,0.0011952451,0.00033314253,0.00017018168,0.000012134747,0.12791373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953243,0.0015890659,0.00021356804,0.0008308663,0.00038170585,9.88156e-7,0.0000023136392,0.000007748716,0.001649419],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882,0.00010619857,0.00027966072,0.00015853906,0.00015980388,0.00047578258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982813,0.00021178534,0.00030916877,0.00013333256,0.00037172262,0.0006926652],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009892148,0.00013233161,0.0002989892,0.000026978232,0.0016965446,0.00006377892,0.000488412,0.00016062506,0.000045561355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019170964,0.00011865537,0.0002329994,0.00014902341,0.0020527903,0.0002870087,0.00003090884,0.0005503388,2.5082167e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000771062,0.000010656131,0.00129075,0.000015665748,0.00008666839,0.000050358067,0.013883648,0.00000989699,0.000022547527,0.97993016,0.0037436383,0.0009483109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033485735,0.000067802896,0.002951265,0.00006274721,0.00009080295,0.00003916826,0.018702747,0.000024630934,0.000012617324,0.016416537,0.9611057,0.00019114671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30471206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9496504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9635136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028786625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028695746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1501988359","doi":"","title":"Internationalizing Gosselin: A Retrospective Case Comment","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Ratification; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Political science; Cultural rights; Scrutiny; Law; Dissent; Politics; Fundamental rights; Human rights","score_opus":0.022498679519826655,"score_gpt":0.3153504110163679,"score_spread":0.29285173149654126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1501988359","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.606505,0.033036858,0.015222404,0.05785163,0.0039121336,0.00045653203,0.000012173759,0.00016597427,0.28283733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99430674,0.0027690155,0.00003639199,0.00048358363,0.001861536,0.0000052241535,6.229641e-7,0.0000045396196,0.000532371],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978264,0.00011013609,0.0001498964,0.00007824085,0.00034888313,0.0014864558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995725,0.00005133313,0.000089150555,0.00003879257,0.00014394816,0.000104255116],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023238838,0.00007492927,0.000098211014,0.000048524475,0.0014745309,0.000047274654,0.00012341904,0.000037689464,0.00008592034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017868751,0.00006695549,0.00007692899,0.00014189263,0.00018647991,0.00029831703,0.00003539546,0.0006758054,0.0000556214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071380773,0.000048653015,0.023992665,2.4308312e-7,0.00009617581,0.000014784508,0.0027930979,7.529612e-7,0.0000034688394,0.9696039,0.00040565516,0.00303348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003404915,0.000072077455,0.0024591906,0.00001645943,0.00004229117,0.0019155255,0.05229324,0.000002914708,0.000007424726,0.78006405,0.16259599,0.00019037943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005530495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014594044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38780174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002343646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00097366655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1502229805","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1152322","title":"Is Bigger Always Better? On Optimal Panel Size, with Evidence from the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Vector Institute; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.04360931027676034,"score_gpt":0.2494148185520122,"score_spread":0.20580550827525185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1502229805","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.970957,0.0026557483,0.00035545547,0.015944146,0.0002236186,0.00011966472,0.00001824897,0.000009756178,0.00971639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996494,0.0020360195,0.000062644176,0.0008144711,0.00036957226,0.0000031387272,2.6882572e-7,0.000005022571,0.00021489365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979067,0.00010490019,0.00016926613,0.00013527265,0.00066480966,0.0010190782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992168,0.00032589873,0.0001374737,0.00009747433,0.00015521303,0.00006715633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008510449,0.00010339232,0.000145645,0.000013202776,0.0008992594,0.000020616168,0.00039234076,0.000035187488,0.00019426149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016617184,0.00006216557,0.000054793534,0.0001468097,0.00039969845,0.00012464683,0.00002687358,0.00060316856,0.000005832401],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013768008,0.00028200797,0.2992302,0.000005214863,0.0021480154,0.000072840274,0.039126087,0.00006934195,0.0003626101,0.6188402,0.018482221,0.02000446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016057176,0.0018595512,0.2325697,0.00070496,0.00048056833,0.00009743554,0.119590744,0.000022992312,0.0019192417,0.6128442,0.02723408,0.0010707671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84030426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93464136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09433708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005559097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008558727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99706185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1505612915","doi":"10.24124/c677/2009136","title":"Fair Opportunity to Participate: The Charter and the Regulation of Electoral Speech","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Political Science Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Democracy; Supreme court; Ideal (ethics); Politics; Law; Liberal democracy; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Political science; Political philosophy; Law and economics","score_opus":0.06832494336399025,"score_gpt":0.3569843105746486,"score_spread":0.2886593672106583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1505612915","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027626183,0.0068534305,0.000011187774,0.83924884,0.00012477064,0.0008928747,0.000011950726,0.000012864465,0.1252179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9750361,0.00072217296,0.000009698347,0.024080815,0.00008309008,0.000008486458,2.3830023e-7,6.631278e-7,0.00005875794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868006,0.000116992225,0.00014596216,0.000114858565,0.00031645902,0.00062565826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985158,0.0000849454,0.000025432117,0.00010873409,0.00014256619,0.0011225621],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023285246,0.00004920139,0.0001355237,0.000027029497,0.00094910944,0.00003906863,0.00025180157,0.000015915686,0.00012839954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028286616,0.00002566481,0.000032726664,0.00059473835,0.003161956,0.00008937017,0.000017691294,0.000055072374,0.000015124341],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.431092e-7,0.0000020809478,0.0001820597,0.000004046441,9.4682895e-7,3.5889065e-7,0.00016617466,2.980506e-8,0.0000054738452,0.983782,0.0007219515,0.015134148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001581386,0.00007377956,0.28151438,0.00067216164,0.00008601938,0.000007787553,0.000709268,0.000019705962,0.000052385087,0.37982216,0.33664876,0.00023544407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21817215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16355531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94740987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017367567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020190845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1507653378","doi":"","title":"Modernism, Polarity, and the Rule of Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Modernism (music); Positivism; Law; Romanticism; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; History; Aesthetics; Art history","score_opus":0.04537545132144194,"score_gpt":0.31114190461469954,"score_spread":0.2657664532932576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1507653378","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048435524,0.0012453296,0.000115836505,0.0060944282,0.000075614764,0.000048150796,0.0000012979275,0.000009624199,0.9439742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99891186,0.00007232314,0.000062503685,0.000495745,0.00010437436,0.0000015127135,7.363146e-8,4.6211028e-7,0.00035116222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997245,0.000030354488,0.000038604783,0.000023102637,0.00010252494,0.00008092538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99985886,0.000066027154,0.000011630436,0.000021297903,0.000020047746,0.000022145667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002958336,0.000018054292,0.00004665167,0.000003127007,0.00038618976,0.0000070995043,0.000040044277,0.000013813901,0.000048642825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026512465,0.000010050294,0.000015416634,0.000021876771,0.0012933465,0.00007145609,0.000036305133,0.000019572819,0.000007639335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029753328,0.000008011104,0.005061269,3.4655724e-7,0.0000055464443,1.1098464e-8,0.004852978,3.731164e-8,0.000007992624,0.9897466,0.00003171,0.00028257296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038083695,0.000005273463,0.031715248,0.000004300969,0.000024723799,4.820808e-7,0.004850905,0.0000051771503,0.00012630469,0.77401626,0.18879466,0.00007581597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056028493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00306407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95047635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000039774336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013523594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9502575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1508142592","doi":"","title":"The Lawmakers: Judicial Power and the Shaping of Canadian Federalism","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Power (physics); Law; Politics","score_opus":0.0428968263195241,"score_gpt":0.2783841588286005,"score_spread":0.2354873325090764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1508142592","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22339347,0.3046077,0.0000034782224,0.27108017,0.0021668794,0.0004171259,0.00007195277,0.000009196533,0.19825003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9562886,0.04178235,0.000024074996,0.0014622044,0.0003721194,0.0000029041491,1.2432754e-7,0.000003818708,0.000063836014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987919,0.00010881671,0.00031501811,0.00007453378,0.00034105568,0.00036869434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987372,0.00021857541,0.00016204598,0.000040581468,0.0005579748,0.00028359852],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012191229,0.00007622166,0.00026017067,0.00024982946,0.0043507246,0.00015766778,0.00021473004,0.000041361825,0.000009000878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001149177,0.000055292105,0.000098448305,0.00054199126,0.0030926063,0.0001263284,0.00002510447,0.00017855168,0.0000014488076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030653904,0.00000663866,0.00071658526,0.000003624194,0.0005806656,0.00033375356,0.021487648,0.00001341745,0.000001260624,0.9421057,0.023682656,0.011037361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012738556,0.00004818606,0.021549633,0.00041918593,0.0000943506,0.00027699902,0.098910235,1.1169563e-7,0.0000033674728,0.11293793,0.7643173,0.0001688944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9920325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8291678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027787223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022504732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1508480457","doi":"","title":"Judicial Appointment, Democratic Aspiration and the Culture of Accountability","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Charter; Separation of powers; Judicial independence; Legislature","score_opus":0.01709328144274032,"score_gpt":0.2745444512393481,"score_spread":0.2574511697966078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1508480457","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9187651,0.013615358,0.0019845695,0.0046101776,0.00027075366,0.00040101697,0.0000023467308,0.000023207045,0.06032744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903143,0.00897176,0.000012962862,0.0001226765,0.00040096682,0.000004425552,3.9516004e-7,0.0000017966001,0.00017073956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987406,0.00017235454,0.00018018442,0.000078543824,0.0003000658,0.00052826654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996191,0.00006610369,0.00012007079,0.000041033283,0.00012459343,0.000029093157],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016990163,0.00006066965,0.00013353991,0.00001830575,0.001639249,0.000015381338,0.000111320136,0.000040617466,0.000012046083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021370241,0.000037100457,0.00006314698,0.00013299042,0.0013214432,0.00014103227,0.00002020471,0.00042171558,0.0000030295257],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074244,0.000030245008,0.0070788097,9.835857e-7,0.0000734327,4.1807675e-7,0.009489004,0.0000022755373,0.000022768807,0.9781921,0.00011713525,0.0049185967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006302822,0.00009574116,0.0040971804,0.0000059941585,0.00003763806,0.0000440329,0.016858561,0.000004145919,0.000009327738,0.97664326,0.0015157473,0.000058084108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033240865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010418131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07154915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023536205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001602931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1508782159","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100009169","title":"W. J. Waluchow A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review: The Living TreeCambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007, 283 p.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.016474768161086957,"score_gpt":0.25084608670783126,"score_spread":0.2343713185467443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1508782159","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.194012,0.06498725,0.00019213403,0.014603428,0.0019251311,0.00068934413,0.00032595862,0.000023447723,0.7232413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97923476,0.011874019,0.000030435565,0.0067623514,0.0006273214,7.5946366e-7,0.000003131796,0.000010710056,0.0014565297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829656,0.00029726038,0.00042207926,0.00016668848,0.00019869562,0.00061870296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975202,0.0007390456,0.0003918339,0.0001463541,0.00044090275,0.0007616659],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042421645,0.00015806903,0.00047068138,0.000031860116,0.0018753116,0.000043320215,0.0004314674,0.00014192537,0.000033270317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027281782,0.00014672664,0.00037409563,0.000226998,0.0026793245,0.0002611502,0.00003829086,0.0004523788,7.701469e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009730186,0.00001160345,0.00030226415,0.0000541563,0.00014485065,0.000068423986,0.009317699,0.0000014461942,0.0000035990367,0.9692288,0.019551838,0.0013055655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032931787,0.000084993204,0.0053784633,0.0010797301,0.0003363887,0.00006605943,0.03702162,0.0000023898174,0.000005287502,0.0066624098,0.948748,0.00028534338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.57286483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8797693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96256644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007098023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012530538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1509336770","doi":"","title":"The Comparative Roles of Courts and Administrative Agencies: Applying Constitutional Principles of Diversity in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Charter; Fundamental rights; Reasonable accommodation; International human rights law; Constitution; Sociology","score_opus":0.1111043011391224,"score_gpt":0.2998630078696602,"score_spread":0.1887587067305378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1509336770","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96247923,0.0033998392,0.00018354914,0.00016642746,0.00007264392,0.00012984927,0.000011987217,0.0000016341293,0.033554845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99740916,0.0025057723,0.000015676185,0.000008402031,0.000023157487,0.000002567654,2.3998115e-7,5.536501e-7,0.00003447823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892354,0.00009153265,0.00018216572,0.00006345539,0.00028951888,0.00044981408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994869,0.00015383837,0.00016656896,0.00002544514,0.00013230243,0.00003493152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083988626,0.000053878866,0.00013333223,0.000021537919,0.0010780877,0.000005285919,0.00014725972,0.00001738279,0.0000074589007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000074209864,0.00003948389,0.000024735979,0.000074776646,0.001819081,0.000074112635,0.00006601234,0.00026037023,1.674875e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036558657,0.00001215957,0.09156383,8.5926183e-7,0.000062675135,0.0000013343636,0.006909413,0.0000070348187,0.000006020233,0.9009635,0.000004400005,0.00043223417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003354015,0.00010424819,0.07796274,0.000044997996,0.000030546296,0.00001615267,0.4949895,0.000010819823,0.00014876912,0.4245543,0.0016839821,0.0001185246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.70068544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99298835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4880801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075569615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01667781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9888967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510074182","doi":"10.21991/c99d4d","title":"L’activisme judiciaire, le prix de la transaction démocratique en Espagne","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01163452758851118,"score_gpt":0.264678791920187,"score_spread":0.2530442643316758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1510074182","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042976714,0.0071853343,0.4440222,0.07809128,0.0056366962,0.000780513,0.0002872945,0.00036482242,0.45933416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98738116,0.0020780829,0.0020142535,0.0029989295,0.0017678967,0.0002156319,0.000082536186,0.00003117227,0.0034303488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932764,0.0016654133,0.0010423402,0.001044474,0.0011267251,0.0018446532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961366,0.0017914287,0.00042072893,0.0004128985,0.00055167143,0.0006866605],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025560658,0.00080563466,0.0008767798,0.00034259498,0.006075377,0.00030883533,0.0006771712,0.0010957252,0.0006227645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015209004,0.0009118995,0.00065258465,0.0010955768,0.03504405,0.00179922,0.00017958197,0.001162255,0.0007151653],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011106275,0.0006522707,0.0053507444,0.00005306597,0.00033063928,0.000045533096,0.000651334,0.002677514,0.00032772194,0.96606505,0.008667724,0.015067326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015505182,0.00012843274,0.001715384,0.00045371943,0.00023467423,0.00035341288,0.003029122,0.0011783721,0.00031014564,0.34019986,0.64996266,0.00088366534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008459282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003034736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9830835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014779025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008731722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99933314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510901266","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i1.4362","title":"ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND THE INSTITUTIONAL LIMITS OF INDEPENDENT COURTS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Judicial independence; Adjudication; Political science; Law; Independence (probability theory); Separation of powers; Commit; Constitutional law; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Legislature; Sociology; Supreme court","score_opus":0.07902777010930453,"score_gpt":0.36232026323610345,"score_spread":0.28329249312679894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1510901266","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71679676,0.0019501441,0.0012937975,0.012747036,0.0020354863,0.0013196521,0.00006072784,0.000047270336,0.26374912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967917,0.00019141957,0.00017124279,0.0017138849,0.00089666183,0.00004031279,0.0000011051089,0.000006225586,0.00018744155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828297,0.00011467979,0.000309579,0.0001889826,0.00075566774,0.00034814217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986664,0.00047352555,0.00014906321,0.00014725841,0.00033296988,0.00023075401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009549787,0.00012886224,0.00027478454,0.00011255032,0.00064825534,0.00010577178,0.00071722444,0.0000771018,0.000099317236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012579706,0.00009844812,0.00005644728,0.00037554148,0.0009897194,0.00074284605,0.00047138412,0.00012609003,0.000035723944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006237967,0.00027528728,0.02384686,0.00022282016,0.00016444296,0.0000046045616,0.014404914,0.00068197114,0.00023066108,0.9501222,0.004881991,0.004540451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022691796,0.00013358226,0.84968495,0.00048750907,0.0023946676,0.000009663307,0.009975705,0.000028986757,0.0015752058,0.008711112,0.12399492,0.0007345319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00412478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008749999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9414111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005945157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029146374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6235461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512087007","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511551116","title":"Common Law Theory","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Comparative law; Philosophy of law; Constitutionalism; Political science; Political philosophy; Common law; Political law; Legal history; Politics; Legal profession; Public law; Legal realism; Empirical legal studies; Constitutional theory; Democracy; Sources of law; Sociology; Chinese law","score_opus":0.028478074350683148,"score_gpt":0.2447391090112745,"score_spread":0.21626103466059135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1512087007","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000026670237,0.00046203332,0.00012283624,0.000035802812,0.00045155,0.0002700828,0.00012090882,0.0001602598,0.99834985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0037499866,0.00015940954,0.000012525241,0.00034401054,0.00058763905,4.3579755e-7,0.000024231671,0.000011893695,0.99510986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986578,0.00016369412,0.00012323758,0.00028313228,0.00042304109,0.0003490664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991248,0.0002472922,0.0001205596,0.00019100023,0.00015826311,0.00015806202],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042277694,0.00020053028,0.00030176388,0.00007710664,0.0014789149,0.000039554438,0.0004965875,0.00035226226,0.00000821394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014354177,0.00023473878,0.00018139019,0.000017410455,0.0028731609,0.000073471114,0.00025730164,0.00036842897,0.000040219307],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004802774,0.000008756861,0.0000025995687,0.000008798429,0.00008771406,0.00014562737,0.000280237,1.488267e-7,5.3648324e-7,0.89906734,0.099466585,0.00088362413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015439432,0.00001306106,0.00001156222,0.000074370735,0.00012746557,0.0000010756083,0.00049955066,1.3259108e-7,0.000009492063,0.003595334,0.99524564,0.00026791974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011029283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011598493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8957791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005291012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005101348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512105164","doi":"","title":"Why is the Japanese Supreme Court so Conservative","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Constitution; Judicial review; Statute; Judicial independence; Judicial activism; Separation of powers; Precedent; Certiorari; Scrutiny; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.07008984514374854,"score_gpt":0.28682574107451697,"score_spread":0.21673589593076842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1512105164","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43655288,0.0001632155,0.000026667018,0.0045799175,0.0008097489,0.0005578498,0.000048832368,0.000053341264,0.5572076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928301,0.000105624604,0.00016627449,0.0025002281,0.00017217759,0.000007401609,0.000009666806,0.0000071322424,0.004201421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99723846,0.00068148016,0.00029259085,0.0004943981,0.00085293886,0.00044015163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985094,0.00029578983,0.00018707933,0.00030280088,0.000512198,0.00019272945],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015473944,0.00022145265,0.00027387065,0.00015342965,0.0069354456,0.0005068127,0.0019156325,0.0002003348,0.0005117484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045876528,0.00020281722,0.00012986033,0.00091290864,0.0034841343,0.0024678092,0.0006598213,0.0006300861,0.00008350222],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003285288,0.00028538675,0.14839311,0.0000062025397,0.000137606,0.00026777797,0.04085902,0.000020378155,0.000073968156,0.80272245,0.006775738,0.00012983002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072395283,0.000047640067,0.09527713,0.00014727439,0.00006060795,0.000016521084,0.030456103,0.000005034381,0.00014591386,0.008847281,0.8638924,0.00038017766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10983798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025627337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85711664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008271839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001749205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512809894","doi":"","title":"Introduction: The Negotiable Constitution: On the Limitation of Rights","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Legislation; Law; Politics; Fundamental rights; Reservation of rights; Bill of rights; Human rights; Law and economics; Right to property; Sociology","score_opus":0.013468949115893967,"score_gpt":0.24250171957427605,"score_spread":0.22903277045838208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1512809894","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20186411,0.0045505045,0.0019006755,0.45141977,0.0018505997,0.0007499203,0.0000017429252,0.00004893765,0.33761373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99516016,0.0011532988,0.0000074533464,0.0002406608,0.0020432612,0.000012740445,4.9655443e-7,0.000001428962,0.0013804928],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986138,0.00017772165,0.00015864168,0.00008090954,0.0003484796,0.0006204684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934757,0.00018670686,0.00011582173,0.00008078483,0.00024303264,0.000026100435],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001361814,0.00006225156,0.00007824914,0.000025728405,0.0024222857,0.000057140085,0.00021347808,0.000031177402,0.00029905958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021611975,0.00003073346,0.00006359834,0.00022439146,0.00094219134,0.00018119773,0.000013497761,0.00054656906,0.0002072535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005256394,0.00001908566,0.0001268085,2.1237608e-7,0.000050214934,8.755962e-8,0.0005303366,0.000034165292,0.000018703768,0.9901474,0.007959886,0.0011078386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007247513,0.00005715466,0.00042592417,0.000006069111,0.000015886271,0.000012596682,0.008716971,0.000003398115,0.000034481294,0.84529334,0.14531924,0.000042485295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004154483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004600203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79329604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028516274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012437769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99887645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W151487474","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/53.1.125","title":"The Question of Case Selection in Comparative Constitutional Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Constitutional law; Comparative law; Analogy; Political science; Field (mathematics); Comparative politics; Constitutional economics; Politics; Epistemology; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.049900953047995945,"score_gpt":0.3854993611052266,"score_spread":0.3355984080572306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W151487474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9144327,0.0009909037,0.00096468424,0.0053792824,0.00013856488,0.00016960924,0.0000057282173,0.000007225632,0.07791127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990943,0.000089579415,0.00023250951,0.00025411462,0.00030147465,0.0000039589095,1.9727429e-7,0.0000010847103,0.000022792672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983186,0.00073149207,0.0003797174,0.00006406331,0.0003495812,0.00015656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981613,0.0007474064,0.00054609496,0.00003975809,0.00045962838,0.000045811936],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010734784,0.00008135934,0.0003090458,0.000032375418,0.0011444616,0.00003072119,0.00017724166,0.000013268674,0.000012879096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001805659,0.00004688153,0.00007568007,0.00038105558,0.012413,0.00021360283,0.000019177023,0.00021544824,0.000007252777],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001897799,0.000057370704,0.00042758734,2.9384836e-7,0.00006522233,0.000007670873,0.0072993254,0.0016357078,0.00007654807,0.9895323,0.00021913463,0.0004890836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018345345,0.0016405489,0.0132242115,0.00025841253,0.00022246352,0.001527021,0.16053288,0.00063371466,0.0025875026,0.42995816,0.38702074,0.00055981916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060814144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05479418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5595741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014812448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026237647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99027467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1515411761","doi":"10.1111/raju.12070","title":"Beyond the Law‐State: The Adequacy of <scp>R</scp>az's Account of Legal Systems in Explaining Intra‐State and Supra‐State Legality","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; State (computer science); Citation; Law; Sociology; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Algorithm","score_opus":0.03164222571396745,"score_gpt":0.28802232252137794,"score_spread":0.2563800968074105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1515411761","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93110883,0.002930522,0.00013025936,0.002110868,0.00040877485,0.0004505699,0.00006215606,0.000017149812,0.06278087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99887127,0.00032954142,0.000015788351,0.00015117627,0.00012899548,0.00003322574,0.0000022092004,0.000005249459,0.00046252427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981732,0.0003765765,0.00044170488,0.00017526028,0.00055241294,0.0002808583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986226,0.00066317915,0.00024018392,0.0001474147,0.00025828948,0.00006836056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022043,0.00012242422,0.00027265964,0.00003816256,0.00049233023,0.00012699825,0.0002546618,0.000041862888,0.0000034530533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053192105,0.00007685742,0.000045089055,0.00034173543,0.001391309,0.00042257065,0.00009489972,0.00016607222,0.0000060349325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004386717,0.00008339128,0.012108433,0.000033308614,0.000101197846,0.000010357919,0.16038118,0.0009241891,0.00027162267,0.819919,0.0046982686,0.0014251984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002327657,0.00037767336,0.035472613,0.00026591297,0.00014552158,0.000013499943,0.32735085,0.0008128933,0.0035486892,0.18619144,0.44302514,0.00046809137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09832277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039406113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63372755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000791343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004323169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97812223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516339818","doi":"10.24926/19441992.586","title":"Squaring the Circle: Democratizing Judicial Review and the Counter-Constitutional Difficulty","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of international law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Strong; Yale University","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitution; Law; Judicial review; Legislation; Politics; Political science; Legislature; Original meaning; Judicial activism; Power (physics); Separation of powers; Supreme Court Decisions; Sociology; Meaning (existential)","score_opus":0.015825647471893398,"score_gpt":0.29514844867312867,"score_spread":0.27932280120123526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516339818","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046265524,0.08677192,0.008352174,0.26571104,0.005801909,0.00078970735,0.000038960323,0.000035955436,0.58623284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876911,0.0055479757,0.00007535844,0.005069101,0.0015110648,0.0000031865145,0.0000012486157,0.0000025949305,0.000098351324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837947,0.000110994464,0.0004948422,0.0000952073,0.00073775195,0.00018174863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825174,0.00067116873,0.00033488957,0.000057674573,0.0006217332,0.00006281603],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031270396,0.0000904492,0.00021006326,0.000036656984,0.0015721935,0.00012833173,0.00042285386,0.00003752899,0.0000879437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072024413,0.000051276944,0.0001330324,0.00014323297,0.0046020024,0.00028418633,0.00007821272,0.00024526936,0.000007835034],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000548845,0.000022746402,0.0010225041,0.0000054030293,0.00011323398,0.000015087259,0.00067431066,0.0000038498792,0.000018020199,0.9948937,0.0014610538,0.0017151757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001426105,0.000033018616,0.018523367,0.0007379859,0.00029358282,0.00044957857,0.002330729,0.000009895107,0.000026881939,0.058566704,0.9173972,0.00020496419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008835681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002271106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9414256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011371168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019400066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1517822021","doi":"10.1515/9781553394518-012","title":"Looking for the Good Judge: Merit and Ideology","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; nobody; Denial; Ideal (ethics); Tribunal; Law; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Politics; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Psychoanalysis; Computer security","score_opus":0.023605744692776386,"score_gpt":0.2331077510872896,"score_spread":0.20950200639451322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1517822021","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000004391376,0.000039962382,0.00012250502,0.0018424676,0.00033914085,0.00071284507,0.00017132629,0.00007774391,0.9966896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008647814,0.0010528505,0.00008826704,0.00034418923,0.00033604502,0.0000075458156,0.0000062789363,0.000017393582,0.9894996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988719,0.000051984283,0.00013802967,0.00035694253,0.00025820345,0.00032289542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989264,0.00042653203,0.00016340174,0.0001686661,0.00021361893,0.000101365345],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017481663,0.00023150233,0.00031747294,0.00006466564,0.0028233612,0.00004028362,0.00037041563,0.00030702303,0.000062411964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036888327,0.00020370782,0.00015208246,0.00000940544,0.0016347973,0.00008996804,0.00035624148,0.0002524137,0.000011833653],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024923529,0.0000036145666,0.0000061899605,0.000011743869,0.0002057553,0.000010416425,0.00031756941,9.5077644e-7,7.770148e-7,0.99292725,0.0026472253,0.003843599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023986888,0.000029652052,0.000023254104,0.00004565538,0.0002509712,6.728865e-7,0.00044073063,0.0000016567095,0.000005798846,0.030544756,0.968175,0.00024198889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019058201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000902364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9655278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012847476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008728639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99847484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1519110318","doi":"10.24908/fg.v10i1.4575","title":"Book Review: Federalism and the Constitution of Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Governance","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Constitution; Dual federalism; Jurisdiction; Political science; New Federalism; Cooperative federalism; Government (linguistics); Law; Public administration; Sociology; Politics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.007224417011551248,"score_gpt":0.22578234476690123,"score_spread":0.21855792775535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1519110318","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020569668,0.5136104,0.00002129594,0.16411282,0.00037148254,0.0005507685,0.000015103438,0.000013891981,0.31924722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.853404,0.095528364,0.00001562357,0.042820573,0.00015295585,0.00004598218,7.31671e-7,0.0000016278643,0.008030142],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928427,0.000064387474,0.00013375825,0.000082876075,0.00029537105,0.0001393223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961823,0.000086812004,0.000106886524,0.000050404586,0.00010105047,0.000036603964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001646462,0.000054450138,0.00014338107,0.0000018131396,0.00087061187,0.000027468475,0.00008868786,0.000017291843,0.00033773063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027355453,0.00003542327,0.000026270578,0.00005519461,0.0010424895,0.00013747785,0.00003057053,0.00005112883,0.0000061753],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036148115,0.0000022833478,0.00021981107,0.000010836252,0.0000071881386,4.5268084e-7,0.00011071305,4.038918e-7,0.0000016358902,0.42244816,0.57676935,0.00042552425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020093376,0.0000030149474,0.0070462385,0.00016316236,0.0000058904916,9.976243e-7,0.000115470546,0.0000027019512,0.000007915267,0.00386865,0.9885295,0.00005552946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9283989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6327489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.851347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006812084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005108531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66961306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1519542469","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1064","title":"Institutional Boundaries and Judicial Review: Some Thoughts on How the Court is Going About Its Business: Desperately Seeking Coherence","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Confusion; Consistency (knowledge bases); Ambivalence; Supreme court; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Judicial interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Perspective (graphical); Law; Judicial activism; Law and economics; Judicial review; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.051602250117015504,"score_gpt":0.3085362819581307,"score_spread":0.2569340318411152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1519542469","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010147049,0.8055733,0.0000756309,0.17091888,0.00084248657,0.0012246047,0.00004547426,0.00008513021,0.020219823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3246569,0.64313895,0.00006860353,0.030157896,0.0017226563,0.00009634052,0.000008911463,0.000010135504,0.00013961688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976122,0.00021098781,0.0003751017,0.00040734065,0.00095350045,0.00044090545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873793,0.00013651192,0.00019092417,0.00020111116,0.0006159807,0.00011756979],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011384446,0.0002774926,0.00057280844,0.000023636589,0.005247965,0.0003930665,0.0003788261,0.00008250674,0.000075805365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00086041156,0.0001918575,0.00012462445,0.0005329738,0.0029903173,0.000631962,0.00011941122,0.00026957024,0.00014395575],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009754872,0.000049397586,0.00007583061,0.0012136166,0.00007001911,0.000017673892,0.0005548733,0.000002747718,0.00002233703,0.98212177,0.013063144,0.0027988118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001795934,0.000024772944,0.00046696127,0.025350627,0.00017212375,0.000011570186,0.00005414151,0.0000010197022,0.000026852396,0.017073706,0.9563693,0.00026935572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014191119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033666322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9650481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020829795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00132425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1522585872","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1060","title":"Principled Remedial Discretion Under the Charter","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Discretion; Remedial education; Jurisdiction; Law; Supreme court; Judicial discretion; Political science; Government (linguistics); Dissent; Judicial review; Politics","score_opus":0.04585485366702277,"score_gpt":0.32392649519547284,"score_spread":0.2780716415284501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1522585872","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003054106,0.15582934,0.002664342,0.36209184,0.0020576674,0.0024108822,0.00001549783,0.0002500481,0.47162628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91283697,0.075744525,0.000047073027,0.010196871,0.00079201243,0.00007556935,0.00000683145,0.000006093757,0.00029402936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988708,0.00011652642,0.0001904803,0.00015007291,0.00044390376,0.00022821342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996105,0.000042355285,0.000059254497,0.00014082021,0.0000853532,0.00006173221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071069313,0.00009050381,0.00017489502,0.000006600837,0.001006239,0.000033157958,0.00021620635,0.000037160164,0.00036142673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006496114,0.00005585916,0.0001112255,0.00018744307,0.00075656496,0.00012361714,0.000036511723,0.00010268219,0.00025925282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020025789,0.000016091552,0.000032892538,0.000023029772,0.000015619777,0.0000011366645,0.00023373611,0.0000019920055,0.0000057521397,0.9981092,0.0005364922,0.0010220293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012161048,0.000011632722,0.00046851556,0.0006706182,0.00005683157,0.0000012774001,0.00019136132,2.2425635e-7,0.000005916237,0.06105155,0.9373188,0.00010162991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003022233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01905981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9370577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000106125844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017916314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1523577258","doi":"","title":"Out of Many: Military Commissions, Religious Tribunals, and the Democratic Virtues of Court Specialization","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Democracy; Legitimacy; Deliberation; Legal pluralism; Rule of law; Pluralism (philosophy); Sociology; Politics; Comparative law; Legal realism","score_opus":0.008635424669849562,"score_gpt":0.2695451852837681,"score_spread":0.2609097606139185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1523577258","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8665239,0.06387951,0.005531651,0.035745256,0.0015119151,0.0006113066,0.000014669763,0.000034344754,0.026147418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.961444,0.037886113,0.000038281476,0.00005521577,0.0003434135,0.000001745586,8.1465436e-7,0.0000030281128,0.00022733948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986992,0.00017552848,0.00027921447,0.0000720043,0.0003226461,0.0004514027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999382,0.00017904532,0.00015678766,0.00006479422,0.00017292531,0.00004443676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002353998,0.00006689121,0.00019465806,0.00003982006,0.00069519307,0.0000094016505,0.00017628593,0.00005370893,0.000016631891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005165873,0.00004347853,0.00007267058,0.000113444126,0.0011308517,0.00007588865,0.000029281215,0.00053217635,0.0000014926962],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008520549,0.00003340408,0.0033793843,0.0000024470967,0.00007673123,3.9074484e-7,0.0022491266,0.0000023536531,0.00025541897,0.9897279,0.00065087795,0.0035367233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054301065,0.0000613878,0.001641174,0.000022331957,0.000059134894,0.000010987776,0.0075455145,0.000015255313,0.000053570475,0.98274434,0.007244705,0.000058579943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023998038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023312123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09492012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000068664274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012695012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9945099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1523621806","doi":"10.29173/alr1426","title":"Dialogue and Hierarchy in Charter Interpretation: A Comment on R. v. Mills","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Charter; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Legislature; Interpretation (philosophy); Hierarchy; Compromise; Law and economics; Legislation; Democracy; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028757525045556655,"score_gpt":0.3115379742702495,"score_spread":0.2827804492246928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1523621806","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0061877565,0.07884672,0.000008057451,0.20281318,0.0002347758,0.0006781751,0.0000028869117,0.000014631087,0.7112138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81971633,0.13180427,0.0000071626855,0.048123535,0.000079737,0.00005603447,0.0000040115247,0.0000022697939,0.000206645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935746,0.00011827773,0.00014560834,0.000121676174,0.000121526384,0.0001354425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960744,0.00023667648,0.000028972723,0.0000602117,0.000020544652,0.00004616916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022865806,0.00006417272,0.00017048459,0.0000133368,0.0002042353,0.000015775013,0.00006951905,0.000021513119,0.00014539067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011343958,0.000051415478,0.00003365876,0.00013335959,0.00025407912,0.00007142194,0.000024669172,0.000055786673,0.000105927254],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000640956,0.000035166853,0.0021682708,0.000036072648,0.000010381722,0.000004535662,0.0014649925,8.751187e-8,2.5175996e-7,0.970944,0.0028157805,0.022514084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084240724,0.000021909424,0.0011320179,0.0012461733,0.0000106311145,0.0000010828859,0.00004558949,9.345249e-7,3.3116353e-7,0.005865722,0.99152297,0.000068400586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044731207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.090934895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9887072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003497952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000205017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1524833258","doi":"10.21991/c93h36","title":"Charter Checks and Parliamentary Balances","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Separation of powers; Orthodoxy; Law; Law and economics; Oxymoron; Power (physics); Democracy; Enumerated powers; Dictatorship; Political science; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0396831487486355,"score_gpt":0.26670781022178597,"score_spread":0.22702466147315048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1524833258","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032295313,0.0052858153,0.015276236,0.01154411,0.0036586102,0.0009938108,0.00033368677,0.00048488274,0.93012756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950345,0.0008021188,0.0009994215,0.0023122665,0.0003473509,0.000109869026,0.000033599757,0.0000070507635,0.00035382027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748755,0.00009373722,0.00045737482,0.00054105604,0.0005758639,0.0008444266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989291,0.00011079855,0.00014589739,0.00019635854,0.00026245925,0.0003554074],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042346856,0.00031705262,0.0003496221,0.00016803991,0.0036273734,0.00009330581,0.00031733743,0.00019351559,0.001011637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022882104,0.00030472694,0.00015756112,0.00030901676,0.017432924,0.00090704585,0.00018634595,0.00024208809,0.00029692324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047963524,0.00010130075,0.09176501,0.0000055403193,0.00009495774,0.000026070056,0.0008353,0.0000018962482,0.00003754496,0.90184647,0.002925151,0.002312798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016288158,0.00011730297,0.016131861,0.0002072748,0.00014865624,0.00015575945,0.029036269,0.000034631368,0.00026142946,0.3167694,0.63441044,0.0010981461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046738256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003295446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96273917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018104078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001146421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526254867","doi":"","title":"Rethinking Constitutional Review in America and the Commonwealth: Judicial Protection of Human Rights in the Common Law World","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Commonwealth; Constitutional law; Human rights; Constitutional review; Common law; Legislature; Judicial review; Status quo; Law and economics; Constitution; Economics","score_opus":0.04724753637126665,"score_gpt":0.3201431300213977,"score_spread":0.27289559365013105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526254867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02725277,0.0063289325,0.00004070373,0.038308524,0.00010296738,0.0013120977,0.0000038388166,0.000022694341,0.92662746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976815,0.00035176543,0.000017045673,0.0017262116,0.00012335158,0.000059779017,0.000002398135,7.51547e-7,0.000037177702],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985693,0.0005493298,0.00031189827,0.00010280455,0.00032623045,0.00014042066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948514,0.00028521454,0.000109090506,0.00006548429,0.000043809905,0.000011270619],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012774608,0.00006567569,0.00022039187,0.000041724117,0.0013346343,0.00002169787,0.00014504734,0.000028016177,0.000033779383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032836135,0.0000358669,0.00003744694,0.0005064429,0.0059577245,0.000083383944,0.00003186814,0.0001955068,0.0000019769861],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013080005,0.000035916237,0.0015388812,0.000012794354,0.000002901943,0.0000014012037,0.0008321492,0.0000023025218,0.0000025873037,0.9968915,0.00044970473,0.00021680619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038705434,0.0000141941555,0.00867734,0.0004282743,0.000012991142,0.000001212791,0.0002681135,0.000004289192,0.0000046379114,0.9041094,0.08602559,0.00006687577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.51782614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.77106225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97042876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051731342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056899808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526980826","doi":"","title":"THE REAL CASE FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW: A PLEA FOR NON- INSTRUMENTALIST JUSTIFICATION IN CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Judicial review; Grievance; Law and economics; Political science; Judicial deference; Democracy; Plea; Law; Constitutional theory; Judicial activism; Deference; Constitution; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019165039572884904,"score_gpt":0.327045633449607,"score_spread":0.3078805938767221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526980826","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13169573,0.17542882,0.16609849,0.32237718,0.006701113,0.015602518,0.0003821599,0.00024940903,0.18146458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94471896,0.053473253,0.00005040704,0.00056799874,0.000864122,0.00008749353,0.000009055901,0.0000030307697,0.00022569209],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980863,0.00011327382,0.00032610938,0.000146531,0.00023358852,0.0010942281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999242,0.00031079163,0.00015722736,0.000060633418,0.00017619107,0.000053162876],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00464998,0.00009776367,0.00015510245,0.00004209943,0.0031142223,0.00006141266,0.00019403003,0.000053676784,0.000004864309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005880143,0.00007367254,0.00012880398,0.00017855332,0.00069548964,0.0001633046,0.000009693819,0.00037322394,0.0000032556295],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000123552,0.00003673147,0.00011122543,0.0000044573885,0.000029219736,0.000003596386,0.00021737051,0.0000028259983,0.000010106577,0.9574895,0.0007691905,0.041202225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005944056,0.00014825238,0.00025297058,0.0001083515,0.00005715635,0.00018357454,0.0057944427,0.000014532347,0.0000035884004,0.9468611,0.045867406,0.00011423512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008210592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02665505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8130232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010579302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039912593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1527035681","doi":"","title":"CONSTITUTIONAL PRECEDENTS IN JAPAN: A COMMENT ON THE ROLE OF PRECEDENT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Adjudication; Original jurisdiction; Precedent; Statute; Majority opinion; Judicial independence; De facto","score_opus":0.055790909303025125,"score_gpt":0.2793036715084343,"score_spread":0.2235127622054092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1527035681","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47327664,0.00007193749,0.000009774616,0.0006991929,0.00037457526,0.000529199,0.000028598719,0.000015202966,0.52499485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99906176,0.00005992636,0.00010664952,0.0002724211,0.00006355218,0.000013391589,0.000008744739,0.0000032657044,0.0004102963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974615,0.00059789716,0.0003699546,0.00038527875,0.0008430714,0.00034230563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989149,0.00029523912,0.00020575232,0.00023048722,0.00022767764,0.00012594038],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015336375,0.00018043061,0.00026517123,0.00019230574,0.0018508673,0.00012968386,0.0014063879,0.00015384865,0.00026060457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004255448,0.00016854401,0.00009670695,0.0007268014,0.0027524484,0.0010572681,0.0005056575,0.00050842843,0.000035821056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002505689,0.0004512579,0.23351996,0.0000030130318,0.000029516248,0.000028483051,0.0033188965,0.00010089644,0.00006729316,0.76194096,0.00006668385,0.00022248008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021093467,0.00020351792,0.43760848,0.0008746485,0.000057773013,0.000015215328,0.034634344,0.000018290184,0.0018789709,0.043176316,0.47876906,0.0006540502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026359618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00813611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71876466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001114883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011494412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1527938502","doi":"10.21991/c9538k","title":"Applying the Burden of Proof and Creating Connections to Communities","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Burden of proof; Arbitrariness; Proof of concept; Epistemology; Law and economics; Sociology; Economic Justice; Computer science; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04185386996911755,"score_gpt":0.2998754247963839,"score_spread":0.25802155482726635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1527938502","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.100759424,0.009943607,0.06113795,0.04472684,0.0049528754,0.006498872,0.0005328749,0.00040665007,0.7710409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99683243,0.000113083086,0.00061791606,0.0007591614,0.00067621697,0.0008141868,0.000017629896,0.0000059528757,0.00016344497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978933,0.00017005755,0.0004603951,0.00019103894,0.0005535825,0.0007316365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821055,0.0007139716,0.00016436282,0.00021984363,0.00041865176,0.00027262713],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008855522,0.0002253084,0.0003094943,0.00016976932,0.0073832665,0.00008431898,0.00032462482,0.000118907206,0.00013196433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00064344774,0.00018440791,0.00012535154,0.0005286354,0.012279447,0.0006162887,0.00029824712,0.00023949835,0.00004519709],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021384525,0.00005825607,0.029138586,0.000009287357,0.00008281232,5.090786e-7,0.0058981515,0.0005760577,0.00009492367,0.9616178,0.0010976446,0.0014045596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051962864,0.000050958024,0.00093300926,0.00026936922,0.00011720613,0.000076191376,0.26112056,0.0001262729,0.00020586743,0.026809283,0.70931315,0.00045850844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016612332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003440941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93480855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015952597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083510706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.993909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1529043408","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1260","title":"Sharpening the Dialogue Debate: The Next Decade of Scholarship","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Oxford; Queen's University; McGill University","keywords":"Charter; Constitutionality; Constitutionalism; Scholarship; Legislature; Constitution; Law; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Judicial review; Relation (database); Focus (optics); Constitutional law; Sociology; Law and economics; Democracy; Philosophy; Politics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.07500833982761843,"score_gpt":0.3243688705626575,"score_spread":0.24936053073503908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1529043408","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028290251,0.0039447327,0.0012141055,0.00988344,0.0007914516,0.00014610542,0.0000034058417,0.000021652551,0.95570487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975594,0.00040996462,0.00012105891,0.00077671977,0.0010461953,0.0000019154502,4.1905923e-7,0.0000046143664,0.00007965711],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849325,0.00020911642,0.0002718175,0.0000902492,0.0005808342,0.0003547532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989247,0.00051484973,0.00017240873,0.00009291155,0.00019634016,0.00009883909],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003662114,0.000082921964,0.00012188794,0.000021788792,0.004347562,0.00017784692,0.0005517681,0.00006482551,0.00011858547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004504175,0.00004425548,0.00011702897,0.00021209489,0.0011225472,0.00029472756,0.00007360267,0.00047809436,0.00003082282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000184613,0.000016817383,0.0035015885,7.671631e-7,0.00003803217,0.00001359866,0.0021985008,0.000013043034,0.00013625452,0.9879491,0.00017172689,0.0059421533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003300485,0.000044297583,0.028101353,0.000080575766,0.00007873009,0.00009826546,0.010580856,0.000003640826,0.0006245332,0.85098755,0.10888196,0.0001882134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04891336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3348835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9692692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000061581726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013583034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99694866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1530421939","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v8n2p88","title":"The Guardian of the Turkish Constitution: A Special Court","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Constitutional economics; Constitutional review; Political science; Law; Constitutional court; Constitution; Liberal democracy; Democracy; Legislature; Constitutional law; Turkish; Judicial review; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03268979629139716,"score_gpt":0.295123636449888,"score_spread":0.2624338401584908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1530421939","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07357221,0.0015362247,0.000016092934,0.03166413,0.0026590982,0.00007323405,0.000012533484,0.0000024061974,0.89046407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99647677,0.00018990703,0.000014807003,0.00035654544,0.0027618527,2.168098e-7,3.464189e-8,7.02021e-7,0.00019915887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931353,0.000060840022,0.00016742123,0.000026161062,0.0003179279,0.000114097485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993408,0.00008881106,0.00012874967,0.000037076185,0.00031722576,0.00008737989],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054994156,0.000033553253,0.00009148041,0.000008169689,0.0007554169,0.000041114636,0.00012279279,0.000025094118,0.000006627597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002288477,0.000017146745,0.00006176381,0.0000557661,0.0023725012,0.000054644206,0.00003034104,0.00008215947,0.0000011144014],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045774054,0.000008625735,0.0013053088,4.8531444e-7,0.000019972964,0.0000019797174,0.0012125245,0.0000014025446,0.0000013068175,0.9895997,0.0076561924,0.0001879318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012882015,0.000027131191,0.0016517336,0.000015215363,0.000021157219,0.00001164967,0.0037453696,4.015256e-7,0.000012264764,0.19885172,0.79551166,0.000022905888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002407969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026961714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92290455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041638894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000549504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87415797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1531936656","doi":"10.26686/wgtn.17006857","title":"Mandatory pre-enactment review of legislation; or should only one government branch be responsible for the protection of rights in the United States?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Judicial review; Order (exchange); Government (linguistics); Law; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.08245029498750828,"score_gpt":0.3566531621127831,"score_spread":0.2742028671252748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1531936656","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28912452,0.07061826,0.003224636,0.08671794,0.0036097087,0.07535195,0.0012984844,0.00017237761,0.46988213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87760675,0.07628234,0.00025252232,0.0026848363,0.0004098524,0.0043033385,0.00080714625,0.000022564956,0.037630625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800915,0.00026395486,0.0004483137,0.00015468875,0.0009799092,0.0001439808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985212,0.00057027896,0.00040066591,0.0001477684,0.0003422466,0.00001784973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013921169,0.00012398271,0.0002693376,0.00004850747,0.00051513914,0.000018798923,0.00023792185,0.00009781669,0.0002693027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033090546,0.00006127737,0.00009345059,0.0004423221,0.00019952384,0.00009690051,0.000013478565,0.00013170076,0.0000018787968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015015153,0.0006319724,0.00009683738,0.0024965168,0.00041363764,5.0413286e-7,0.021793088,0.000039938204,0.0001228349,0.9447709,0.018938998,0.009193285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005692942,0.0003579468,0.010545635,0.005540813,0.00033626176,3.179199e-7,0.015545866,0.00003200885,0.000802688,0.0268664,0.9391386,0.00026418563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08004658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14175636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9201996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016823482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053469645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92607945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535369152","doi":"10.21991/c9c09s","title":"The Constitution Act, 1982: the Foreseen and Unforeseen","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Writ; Law; Delegation; Political science; Repatriation; Economic Justice; Prime minister; Work (physics); Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.03976722809875146,"score_gpt":0.2728279921872436,"score_spread":0.2330607640884921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1535369152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005049206,0.007267762,0.016596861,0.03343678,0.0036272812,0.001858068,0.0003279963,0.00039386333,0.9314422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99530584,0.0015920283,0.00023695901,0.0014331857,0.00042094843,0.00024437415,0.00003354699,0.000008520251,0.00072462513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962451,0.00026501808,0.00068387325,0.0005665976,0.0009851486,0.0012542887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99747634,0.0008364984,0.00027049688,0.00045892198,0.00059662026,0.00036110336],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001444336,0.00041693353,0.000349128,0.00013831367,0.018567923,0.00032681695,0.0008967832,0.00025015374,0.00019262449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015614365,0.00026541285,0.0002539703,0.0006371615,0.054442737,0.0009190786,0.00043115538,0.0005039783,0.00019571256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102810365,0.000056073077,0.02931653,0.0000039683873,0.00015118251,0.000016405835,0.00070939626,0.000015541658,0.000008399201,0.959087,0.0068166014,0.00371608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063708896,0.000046906316,0.0046918103,0.0000671873,0.00009448299,0.00011509827,0.009729602,0.000053446616,0.000043139687,0.26162323,0.7224899,0.00040813786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069980766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015334518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9902566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028362885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028897831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1536010178","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100000454","title":"Miriam Smith Political Institutions and Lesbian and Gay Rights in the United States and Canada. New York: Routledge, 2008, 244 p.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Lesbian; Gay rights; Politics; Gender studies; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.05348297282524636,"score_gpt":0.27064297974152857,"score_spread":0.2171600069162822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1536010178","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93915564,0.004099236,0.000016171976,0.018341798,0.000326357,0.00018574246,0.00011721283,0.0000047816507,0.037753034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945478,0.0008503721,0.00007981841,0.0040352736,0.00023339265,0.0000023773507,0.0000053281183,0.0000049725086,0.0002407008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987522,0.000119023935,0.00026428615,0.00016518695,0.00010820932,0.00059111713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819446,0.0001872834,0.00009181427,0.000067186615,0.0001369807,0.0013222694],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005915171,0.00014163688,0.0002657914,0.00006130494,0.0015243987,0.000105119754,0.000150166,0.00011140671,0.00001948362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000105111525,0.00011961968,0.000050864113,0.00018977941,0.0020411944,0.00017506607,0.000017177143,0.0003273514,1.559946e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034635732,0.0000060277744,0.0043564546,0.000009370222,0.000051841947,0.0000788928,0.049963433,8.661471e-7,2.44474e-7,0.9409646,0.004410605,0.00015423405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084832,0.00009250336,0.036864124,0.00018419759,0.00013135726,0.00025320065,0.1259412,0.000015259739,0.0000011904274,0.14876768,0.6865397,0.00036125717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99811393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79219687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048628988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041519688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1541692914","doi":"","title":"'Officers of the Commonwealth' in the Private Sector: Can the High Court Review Outsourced Exercises of Power?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; High Court; Law; Charter; Political science; Scope (computer science); Consistency (knowledge bases); Context (archaeology); Public administration","score_opus":0.013352696088358824,"score_gpt":0.26142973378837,"score_spread":0.24807703770001116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1541692914","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8112278,0.046585344,0.000024450444,0.12984598,0.0003331789,0.0010191293,0.0000072205003,0.000010153729,0.0109467255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9538731,0.04484661,0.0000018875579,0.0010969011,0.00009079809,0.000014230065,2.842658e-7,0.0000037599152,0.000072438415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770904,0.0005161001,0.00034276795,0.000080502294,0.0005671648,0.000784434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912626,0.00021242978,0.00032776527,0.00015952344,0.00014606609,0.000027937567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028079199,0.000091975555,0.00023030072,0.000024495255,0.00075305405,0.000020732017,0.00080948754,0.000035497782,0.00005719112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018548394,0.00004092561,0.0001301069,0.0003996679,0.00071658526,0.00006278552,0.000052263043,0.0007861676,0.000004653559],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001707585,0.000073909105,0.014361214,0.000026480342,0.00011768718,4.0176832e-7,0.008387338,0.000019982288,0.00004710928,0.9705932,0.00209237,0.004263235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008608088,0.0003347569,0.20006661,0.0013920895,0.00030284288,0.000046802677,0.098663986,0.000002941806,0.00006195676,0.641719,0.056191545,0.0003566574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026594982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04455938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3288742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032396914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020759685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.979887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1541830738","doi":"","title":"Transnational Perspectives on the U.S. Transnational Law Controversy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Law; Constitutional theory; Political science; Constitutional law; Jurisprudence; Adjudication; Constitution; Legitimacy; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.048953891855240884,"score_gpt":0.27501075771657224,"score_spread":0.22605686586133136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1541830738","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004850765,0.000033270673,0.00039655328,0.11144667,0.00011167023,0.0001236484,0.000011631969,0.00003922904,0.88298655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99749917,0.000009820494,0.000077044926,0.0017341475,0.000105597006,0.000019893543,9.955291e-7,0.00000184286,0.00055149285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992444,0.00006040436,0.00007480472,0.000111940644,0.0003812239,0.00012721124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955803,0.00022891918,0.000016114525,0.00003726526,0.00012660562,0.00003308442],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025368124,0.00005542759,0.000056910787,0.000016754577,0.001009508,0.000018870698,0.00012942539,0.000029341323,0.0039146515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036140565,0.00003530079,0.00006783294,0.00009301442,0.0010043498,0.000100239675,0.0000041170915,0.000063703075,0.00002106037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018568966,0.00006286003,0.00009359488,1.3642905e-7,0.000029057197,5.0401604e-7,0.01616558,6.99603e-7,0.000006440415,0.9832611,0.0003075431,0.00005388501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025935785,0.00003940955,0.010272667,0.0000011155518,0.000013992914,3.2122526e-7,0.04928139,0.0000039915103,0.00007600883,0.7858755,0.15405782,0.00011843713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010837631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005770289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9926484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004829834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010038707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542311799","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004689","title":"A Reply to Critics of Constitutional Goods","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Constitutional law; Politics; Philosophy; Law and economics; Political science; Art history; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.044947234081025564,"score_gpt":0.3842785798834956,"score_spread":0.33933134580247004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1542311799","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025592253,0.00030062345,0.0019369816,0.062999986,0.0002153485,0.00012048798,0.0000053562935,0.000047827965,0.9087811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99435294,0.000030262692,0.0008608001,0.0036765018,0.00018018481,0.0000019893805,4.962328e-7,6.343383e-7,0.0008961654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943733,0.00002364809,0.00008458792,0.000084133935,0.0002351358,0.00013516414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997006,0.000049079525,0.000020906085,0.000053021384,0.00010774255,0.00006863483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016934934,0.00004009032,0.00008594318,0.000025770876,0.00029668456,0.000009314248,0.00008176686,0.00002176353,0.000098629804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038256,0.00003915703,0.000031978274,0.00019363912,0.00075563,0.000036120506,0.000014585377,0.000034007888,0.000041544674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066504026,0.000026894702,0.0004934196,6.1580675e-7,0.000004533635,0.0000019367008,0.0035208638,0.000007753618,0.00016676004,0.9877495,0.007123689,0.00089738204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012124912,0.000082904335,0.008258225,0.000032751945,0.000012850476,0.0000013117692,0.006520604,0.0000011532703,0.00036026098,0.073335655,0.9111565,0.00011655037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027795604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020124803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9687607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036749454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023750929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42018822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542365935","doi":"","title":"A Comparative Assessment of the Politics of Judicial Retirement in Canada and the United Kingdom","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mandatory retirement; Supreme court; Kingdom; Politics; Law; Test (biology); Political science; Service (business); Economics","score_opus":0.03916541946233784,"score_gpt":0.3279730185603466,"score_spread":0.2888075990980088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1542365935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99119234,0.0010190905,0.00003793558,0.0026967968,0.00016169221,0.000113216425,0.0000022799604,7.993245e-7,0.0047758603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992778,0.00047739706,0.0000045569236,0.00008928712,0.00012728937,0.0000020153623,1.6009562e-7,0.0000010678855,0.000020461142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985141,0.00027992006,0.00018882855,0.000034378296,0.0003642186,0.00061855215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955535,0.00013919076,0.0001557437,0.00003604701,0.000085177366,0.000028479355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014790493,0.000045570003,0.00014445237,0.000025212332,0.00044316257,0.0000048980055,0.0001329921,0.000014032677,0.0000049103182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006554026,0.00002519061,0.000030368388,0.00022262998,0.00061514834,0.0000361885,0.00003627652,0.000383273,5.3888225e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008988069,0.000014512535,0.1569983,5.9513764e-7,0.00004273031,4.8359666e-8,0.0017909927,0.000012047417,0.0000045395723,0.84105504,0.000017576504,0.000054620945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012493924,0.000054216976,0.51050353,0.00006258998,0.000082418985,0.000006756159,0.070172414,0.00004730123,0.000039539682,0.41422373,0.003450666,0.00010747329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9678466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98830277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42683133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012571869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009014674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1545588899","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1183","title":"The Constitutional Status of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Supreme court; Law; Statute; Parliamentary sovereignty; Political science; Parliament; Sovereign immunity; Separation of powers; Politics","score_opus":0.03048684956872575,"score_gpt":0.2914957824644766,"score_spread":0.26100893289575083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1545588899","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018812262,0.29681468,0.00003472034,0.0745285,0.0012288683,0.0011658575,0.00020201362,0.000026026963,0.6241181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9389951,0.058303945,0.000018911758,0.0023261928,0.000110197194,0.000009164989,0.000002651473,0.0000019152305,0.00023191686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800324,0.0001918253,0.0004060225,0.00012871252,0.0008932145,0.00037700176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880654,0.0002282003,0.00020295588,0.00021553773,0.00045551368,0.00009126002],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076008955,0.00010715054,0.00030041937,0.0000060750262,0.0012687653,0.00001239597,0.0004274185,0.00003302519,0.00012806764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059616676,0.00006120805,0.00014043521,0.0002681344,0.0031202065,0.0000674832,0.0000523624,0.00011162461,0.0000035936673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041118233,0.000018649123,0.0008717035,0.000042465817,0.000029563482,6.7208657e-7,0.00006171614,0.0000031927598,0.000011328387,0.9738209,0.02405219,0.0010834989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007675466,0.000012926011,0.0034750032,0.0007015742,0.000057107096,0.0000011621812,0.00013148613,6.7022154e-7,0.00003564503,0.0161916,0.9792359,0.00008017113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40060592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.72031486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9576293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016990106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036364791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552243689","doi":"10.21991/c9037n","title":"Disputed Election Results: A More Rigorous \"Magic Number Test\"","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Democracy; Political science; General election; Government (linguistics); Law; Faith; Public administration; Politics; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014966732551563122,"score_gpt":0.2775262897633366,"score_spread":0.2625595572117735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1552243689","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012581731,0.0010334312,0.030377114,0.067686856,0.004253519,0.0023617905,0.0007634342,0.0011660008,0.8797761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924054,0.00027668377,0.0009608889,0.0026837545,0.0007759008,0.00032038742,0.00022244315,0.000015454516,0.0023390835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99538237,0.00015170546,0.00095823524,0.0008683996,0.0011927412,0.001446547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969094,0.0006199935,0.00032517037,0.00039200965,0.0012295193,0.0005239339],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005444157,0.0005204482,0.00051458017,0.000240449,0.0055916333,0.0003585191,0.0005570999,0.0003803501,0.0014550382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002802767,0.00049956917,0.00035420814,0.0011983705,0.015476004,0.0017227477,0.00022069059,0.0005011492,0.0050449553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051649084,0.0002641806,0.026858957,0.00000654115,0.00010272025,0.000022878548,0.0002886779,0.00010362725,0.00011562076,0.92183924,0.048452564,0.0018933238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025797358,0.00009153387,0.008205607,0.00022161288,0.00012970764,0.0002578019,0.008979115,0.00033472714,0.00013160551,0.19466348,0.7831545,0.0012505961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012901672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029747754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97982365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077409483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002830327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552697023","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511781490.009","title":"Judicial review, legislative override, and democracy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Democracy; Law; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.028133680037021012,"score_gpt":0.24669325094251995,"score_spread":0.21855957090549893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1552697023","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000030772273,0.0041308366,0.000033293327,0.0005088495,0.00040915702,0.00048491408,0.00017110616,0.00008236947,0.9941487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014780645,0.018586842,0.00004364215,0.00046936097,0.0006230758,7.909409e-7,0.000013591065,0.000014245458,0.9787704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987265,0.000055995835,0.00016017852,0.00038783118,0.00040077552,0.00026875845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904704,0.00012800634,0.0002103796,0.00017259474,0.00025894927,0.00018305595],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000208591,0.00025592875,0.00043388503,0.000073747666,0.0015295409,0.000033667242,0.00029296108,0.00033078858,0.000021130109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008779379,0.00029057788,0.00015302862,0.000011874963,0.0022039632,0.00012556156,0.0003069921,0.0005686128,0.000018573897],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019530475,0.0000036910194,0.000007961481,0.000036706446,0.000083878745,0.00007411324,0.0001774893,1.1856118e-8,0.0000056157683,0.9707772,0.027262243,0.0015515632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016531354,0.00001658123,0.00005812163,0.000594939,0.00026631993,0.000002998523,0.00006583695,2.1176788e-7,0.0000061560727,0.0013472934,0.99715483,0.00032140224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064064055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006304825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96989256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012939016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003924256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553021964","doi":"","title":"Weak Constitutionalism: Democratic Legitimacy and the Question of Constituent Power","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":166,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Democracy; Legitimacy; Political science; Legislature; Constitutional theory; Politics; Power (physics); Law and economics; Law; Separation of powers; Sociology","score_opus":0.020473838380557663,"score_gpt":0.295831323279422,"score_spread":0.27535748489886436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1553021964","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000022109542,0.008176411,0.0003979247,0.0036689248,0.0007063328,0.0005408695,0.000036721656,0.00003840142,0.9864123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39107686,0.0030693465,0.00018910595,0.0008675897,0.0009641218,0.00006256437,0.000032210373,0.000010702572,0.6037275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854183,0.00017328096,0.00033065982,0.00017586935,0.0005506135,0.00022772045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987493,0.0005609792,0.00021408117,0.00010990857,0.00027493198,0.00009079877],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094927626,0.00017952471,0.00039593436,0.000053773903,0.00090645556,0.000035850655,0.00016238405,0.00017953741,0.0006171913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003222104,0.00011670013,0.000120122044,0.00006573266,0.0140754245,0.00014049032,0.00009367568,0.0001895075,0.000060018356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002313821,0.000016854947,0.00014599523,0.00000984499,0.00009421464,9.0376756e-7,0.0005288515,6.391982e-7,5.557807e-7,0.9675615,0.03134281,0.00027470404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003888965,0.000007907469,0.00012934796,0.00013514893,0.00015008585,0.0000059261292,0.00046480732,7.035832e-7,0.0000010882322,0.39089456,0.6076714,0.00015015982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034315826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014691306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57666695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001345176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016829035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9886077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553681044","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i3.2278","title":"Wigmore's Chart Method","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Argument (complex analysis); Dialectic; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Perspective (graphical); Rhetoric; Chart; Tree diagram; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Linguistics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03943531913906263,"score_gpt":0.33678029571594514,"score_spread":0.2973449765768825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1553681044","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013806462,0.00014292513,0.00019308146,0.0021299315,0.00013819199,0.00007727231,0.0000034533605,0.00008471175,0.98342395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98712087,0.0003048331,0.0012679065,0.0032288542,0.00048654614,0.0000144581945,0.0000029786142,0.0000019152349,0.0075716306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993529,0.000028263032,0.000108890585,0.000067179455,0.00021172833,0.00023108875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998004,0.000039564846,0.000020102054,0.000045139146,0.000036187383,0.000058642694],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030209994,0.0000549015,0.00008291819,0.000018769268,0.00066189433,0.000029817456,0.00012626314,0.000046000052,0.0040836344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004517317,0.00004414766,0.00004661046,0.00014903469,0.0002687004,0.00023584743,0.000018831091,0.00006366359,0.0015628752],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001266108,0.0000120865625,0.00093520107,8.1367347e-7,0.00000960338,0.000004009131,0.002424222,0.0000308787,0.0000027686806,0.8500742,0.0014997887,0.1449938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008007067,0.000022282884,0.008168601,0.0000034777333,0.0000049805913,0.0000018565885,0.00080659025,0.000010281911,0.000010599312,0.02917405,0.9616292,0.00008798823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002832248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049980765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9758523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020067671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007953474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99921453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553724378","doi":"","title":"Rule of Beliefs: Constitutional Conventions and the Rule of Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rule of law; Law; Political science; Legislature; Public law; Due process; Law and economics; Private law; Constitutional law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.011350601420818748,"score_gpt":0.2609643936043941,"score_spread":0.24961379218357535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1553724378","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44345695,0.035043634,0.003247416,0.039728094,0.0007301895,0.0007748552,0.000031046737,0.000034996447,0.47695282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995576,0.003756728,0.0000309709,0.000105451516,0.00015848734,0.000007790013,7.089294e-7,0.0000015186235,0.00036232852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988132,0.000100433645,0.00022478352,0.00006542242,0.00027714108,0.0005190195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940556,0.0001357037,0.00014591753,0.00004267257,0.00023115176,0.00003898889],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011214145,0.000056530633,0.00015074087,0.00002725857,0.0009168905,0.000021546719,0.00013972036,0.000035222587,0.0001213848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011200955,0.0000379298,0.00008871412,0.00009553232,0.006033291,0.0001488723,0.0000318695,0.00031736266,0.000013605392],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011373011,0.000028890996,0.0009095771,0.0000014085899,0.00010240711,1.04076e-7,0.0006943009,0.000002169304,0.000055227472,0.9973133,0.000044192973,0.00083700055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006002644,0.000029995084,0.0012476469,0.000018745788,0.000032705564,0.000018438503,0.004639359,0.0000020795896,0.000029648652,0.98613936,0.007194078,0.000047681217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010169001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031106526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5521191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000099849036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001555525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99667174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1555250870","doi":"","title":"The New Constitutionalism and the Judicialization of Pure Politics Worldwide","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Politics; Legitimacy; Political science; Public sphere; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Judicial review; Law; Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.016257660610434908,"score_gpt":0.3098850748993388,"score_spread":0.2936274142889039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1555250870","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027058722,0.012833494,0.0021807908,0.18458328,0.00057771616,0.0003954967,0.0000059646645,0.000049141447,0.7723154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940793,0.0005225781,0.000033789136,0.00027672565,0.00055695255,0.0000036651393,0.00000124913,0.0000014171947,0.0045243353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940264,0.000077490455,0.00010310969,0.00005971705,0.0002304017,0.00012661493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994361,0.00033447403,0.000061147206,0.000051538154,0.0000911954,0.000025562898],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032436862,0.000043417753,0.00007617535,0.0000115932635,0.0013952262,0.000035624267,0.00008824634,0.00002556939,0.000016710383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000274323,0.000024756673,0.000028093562,0.0001575328,0.0029367455,0.000033220727,0.000028307788,0.000040727893,0.000004171267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007540402,0.0000037978054,0.0008197753,5.984241e-7,0.000008166893,2.1172583e-7,0.0018445331,0.000013507538,0.0000054068773,0.98833746,0.00871591,0.00024307046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024587553,0.0000025942566,0.003098751,0.000010349269,0.000020483729,6.056299e-7,0.0035768766,0.000005875405,0.000023491233,0.60543543,0.3875408,0.00003888083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056311164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01952061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9670206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023631534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029319158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1556299623","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1260","title":"Access to Charter Justice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Economic Justice; Political science; Business; Civil rights; Affect (linguistics); Quality (philosophy); Procedural justice; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.07897038468263232,"score_gpt":0.36867579891541974,"score_spread":0.2897054142327874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1556299623","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007064799,0.05030342,0.00011963185,0.12734692,0.0007860152,0.0014021536,0.0000074301947,0.000104678795,0.8192233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.764275,0.09648615,0.00023347903,0.1344159,0.0016593849,0.00060007535,0.0000063911093,0.000015237185,0.0023083766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989633,0.00008263093,0.00017839756,0.00017182247,0.00033150296,0.00027236802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936754,0.000056366825,0.00003725148,0.0001284615,0.00025577316,0.0001545999],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033872627,0.000089553854,0.0002138575,0.00001244547,0.0006376518,0.00010821158,0.0003634555,0.000029324721,0.003084207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019817246,0.00007241354,0.000070086666,0.00023918858,0.00022715349,0.00038064516,0.00010717096,0.000062969055,0.0043486445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.517723e-7,0.000019540284,0.00020929873,0.00019447473,0.000016304084,0.0000014254146,0.00022358209,1.8503387e-7,0.0000076149086,0.767535,0.22320166,0.008590192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028282604,0.000007774244,0.00092987175,0.00068180554,0.0000646422,4.0798153e-7,0.0000659819,2.4895766e-7,0.0000028958395,0.0070144916,0.991092,0.00011158852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0112952255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035298034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8169149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044149212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000795578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1556722091","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226474.001.0001","title":"Interpreting Constitutions","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Originalism; Subject (documents); Field (mathematics); Political science; Politics; Epistemology; Sociology; Structuralism (philosophy of science); Law; Philosophy; Library science","score_opus":0.03299286928971369,"score_gpt":0.2610408205038639,"score_spread":0.22804795121415022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1556722091","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000104977225,0.00017120018,0.0009864882,0.000074564865,0.0005222347,0.00025801966,0.00007932754,0.0001709305,0.99772674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0028055774,0.00034786004,0.0001140816,0.0001261139,0.00036916434,5.899451e-7,0.000015318234,0.000007825543,0.9962135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882793,0.00006410879,0.00013730793,0.00026799383,0.00036051124,0.00034212496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992358,0.00016725036,0.00013360333,0.00013559699,0.0001863103,0.00014142635],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024740343,0.00017924386,0.0002396461,0.00012773405,0.0016649804,0.00004390944,0.00040698383,0.0003215603,0.000050873947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000565913,0.00021484567,0.00016932502,0.000023760163,0.0025880286,0.000083339095,0.00025530905,0.0003611232,0.000004666544],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020942374,0.000007247911,0.000013332862,0.00000654735,0.00008084764,0.00007093732,0.0010207643,0.0000011163174,4.3724302e-7,0.9770431,0.019128505,0.0026062361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011915111,0.000010603884,0.000003976401,0.0001555908,0.00009736822,0.0000012812949,0.00081607903,8.5760064e-7,0.0000021873514,0.00655049,0.9920059,0.00023655014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024612132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002236694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9728774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006147704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011976791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1558787610","doi":"","title":"Constitutional remedies in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Canada Law Book","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.01511874661077318,"score_gpt":0.21306212178770484,"score_spread":0.19794337517693167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1558787610","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000011712033,0.007066711,0.0000010745092,0.0042620613,0.0016266378,0.00029128566,0.0001747054,0.000015403173,0.9865504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025794022,0.00070656615,0.000009792497,0.013254785,0.0011344184,0.00006589358,0.000079989826,0.0000099918325,0.95894456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978794,0.00004788577,0.00030547124,0.00027479895,0.0010288764,0.00046355452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916327,0.00019858207,0.00010868723,0.00011915725,0.00020012615,0.00021019977],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000116235526,0.00021889653,0.0003673237,0.000020737843,0.00076910417,0.000028386317,0.0002952979,0.00012795461,0.001820954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000088217144,0.00022669877,0.00004325758,0.000059294314,0.0025536483,0.000102327176,0.00006530938,0.00031653827,0.000038545808],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.549517e-7,0.0000011349304,0.000058400958,0.0000040164837,0.000018208068,0.00006554478,0.000028152366,0.0000031932295,4.2991775e-8,0.52796096,0.47175157,0.00010780083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008207687,0.0000022848997,0.000081390855,0.000118009055,0.000013313575,0.0000013752428,0.00027953542,4.1415302e-7,6.584047e-7,0.021818532,0.97733414,0.00026826945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50614244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011971483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17148368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1559463507","doi":"","title":"Constitutionalism, Judicial Review, and Progressive Change","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Constitution; Political science; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Judicial review; Legislature; Judicial activism; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.03625011304463269,"score_gpt":0.31315411008103683,"score_spread":0.2769039970364041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1559463507","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01263149,0.28515095,0.000024113768,0.09313619,0.00082253135,0.0015825834,0.00009432755,0.00028226755,0.60627556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96140534,0.012083585,0.00031696356,0.022013737,0.0034585122,0.00020342771,0.000010537928,0.000006386826,0.00050148583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987783,0.00009267949,0.00019462065,0.0002418588,0.00037747898,0.0003150947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994025,0.00005621063,0.00008026528,0.00009017146,0.00016671901,0.0002041397],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037953287,0.00012422472,0.00023067134,0.000024441219,0.0013257805,0.000058079288,0.00014597978,0.00007749798,0.00079565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024459854,0.00011367409,0.00005755643,0.00019170134,0.0018626292,0.00041635157,0.00007706233,0.0001497156,0.0003650443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051290576,0.00003231432,0.0015883531,0.000017813822,0.000024545943,0.000008028122,0.0003519433,1.6810306e-7,0.0000036309525,0.9866764,0.007833824,0.0034578613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019326278,0.000016780075,0.002265632,0.00023343529,0.00006777559,0.0000063618804,0.00021203124,4.5708052e-7,0.000009033652,0.0125294225,0.9842874,0.00017839891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00704464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009457361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9764536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000093063325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020662951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1560480705","doi":"","title":"Legal Outlier, Again? U.S. Felon Suffrage: Comparative and International Human Rights Perspectives","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Suffrage; Law; Human rights; Universal suffrage; Democracy; Jurisprudence; Politics","score_opus":0.01714614633648693,"score_gpt":0.32253337236704055,"score_spread":0.3053872260305536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1560480705","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8475894,0.0018101124,0.00015650672,0.00401916,0.00078217115,0.00010311216,0.0000031398683,0.000035055327,0.14550136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944805,0.0006945689,0.000031152416,0.00003862809,0.0014198361,0.0000037753439,0.0000016658138,0.0000036573392,0.0033262442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983284,0.00008381962,0.0001567373,0.00018051609,0.00033090575,0.0009196532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994883,0.00005253971,0.00009676759,0.000047706813,0.00021922181,0.00009546305],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000981159,0.000111339854,0.00014820848,0.00008096359,0.002689553,0.00016221782,0.00024266423,0.0000647603,0.00010880274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000061127415,0.000093683906,0.00006717997,0.0001020205,0.0008151312,0.00034966125,0.00004448162,0.0014540749,0.000019226138],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015414076,0.000058027694,0.002001569,2.1497539e-7,0.000120422315,0.0000029891573,0.006111677,5.6220307e-7,0.0001983858,0.9904922,0.00018752569,0.00081101415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043193015,0.00009101442,0.0063580037,0.0000077839795,0.00002289985,0.000063306165,0.0372508,0.0000036075592,0.000019108884,0.8482717,0.10730111,0.00017871156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060208556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17592427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16990343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039127062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084171485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1561034820","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511493904","title":"European and US Constitutionalism","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Computer science; Library science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.025965273204075198,"score_gpt":0.2236831641834604,"score_spread":0.1977178909793852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1561034820","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000095709715,0.0008108328,0.000046116853,0.00012347492,0.00026457754,0.00021178232,0.00019761744,0.0001156418,0.99813426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0050349333,0.00078396354,0.00003249572,0.00022391438,0.0009247157,3.2927733e-7,0.000025375046,0.00000904604,0.9929652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998894,0.00014711302,0.00010813485,0.0003038732,0.00030496137,0.00024193958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939054,0.00007505743,0.00010032806,0.0001166943,0.00015033438,0.00016703314],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020118595,0.00018188526,0.00022024687,0.00007415822,0.0012777935,0.00005408533,0.00026937237,0.00015469099,0.0000061393916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030818534,0.00021649343,0.00009223089,0.000012111512,0.0028998847,0.000085727406,0.00026283922,0.00024748407,0.000033130087],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010263405,0.0000051648385,0.00001090736,0.000006493651,0.000060984472,0.00011891397,0.00016112842,4.6437324e-7,7.9068803e-7,0.8882024,0.110444024,0.0009784388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021465968,0.0000074751197,0.00020405362,0.00007520854,0.0001062744,0.00000491201,0.00012954902,5.4027674e-7,0.0000011037215,0.0000680576,0.9989413,0.00024687668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025026398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015328974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8884973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031845985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073231495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1561623001","doi":"","title":"Refining the Reasonable Apprehension of Bias Test: Providing Judges Better Tools for Addressing Judicial Disqualification","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Fredericton; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Apprehension; Test (biology); Jurisprudence; Impartiality; Empirical research; Jury; Computer science; Order (exchange); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Economics; Mathematics; Statistics; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.2246390831351174,"score_gpt":0.3520059039448535,"score_spread":0.12736682080973608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1561623001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.769434,0.0006008292,0.0031749187,0.04065782,0.000407584,0.0013665176,0.000018353338,0.00016211723,0.18417788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99700767,0.000023793353,0.0014594868,0.0005395738,0.00040902357,0.00014725806,0.0000062958984,0.000004891052,0.0004020275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903744,0.00008142543,0.0002241045,0.00015299678,0.00028580186,0.00021821096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977817,0.0016928134,0.00013954952,0.00009242571,0.00026130243,0.000032241154],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006716873,0.00007419653,0.00013494317,0.000025798463,0.0013372663,0.00013535735,0.00014909294,0.00005285784,0.000084170264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002597874,0.000047430778,0.0000607285,0.00018004556,0.0004220959,0.00042010122,0.000046160898,0.000054429373,0.000021621034],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026153904,0.00012519484,0.043883137,0.000038405466,0.00005470094,2.1285948e-7,0.008576444,0.000017316032,0.018861113,0.6391807,0.020876043,0.26836056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013255014,0.0003112252,0.19246607,0.0007418282,0.00026828676,0.00000207984,0.098264,0.0008047893,0.023023129,0.26599208,0.41563657,0.0011644318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077256598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007061031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39476052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038873008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010499358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1562336716","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781316018132.005","title":"The Constitutional Itch","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Computer science; Internet privacy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0593649523209513,"score_gpt":0.25007485063163265,"score_spread":0.19070989831068136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1562336716","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000038009157,0.0012819825,0.00009222604,0.0003593218,0.00069674494,0.00025609205,0.00016728693,0.000088544504,0.997054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00338538,0.0006700892,0.0000087017615,0.00006132239,0.00055255723,7.610252e-7,0.000012154172,0.00000595236,0.9953031],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987462,0.00005292871,0.00011762381,0.00024187489,0.00057521585,0.00026613788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891055,0.00016563911,0.00012005949,0.00017088871,0.00046396244,0.00016890543],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030214334,0.00017782206,0.00019463523,0.00003995161,0.0027103291,0.00006418259,0.00047776618,0.00021835633,0.000007928781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006239286,0.00015986158,0.00014192562,0.000008615828,0.007080399,0.000062008716,0.00024615563,0.00028754032,0.00006636609],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025219415,0.0000023763118,0.0000026628725,0.0000016342232,0.00008120816,0.000044852288,0.0000678864,5.670402e-7,2.5965764e-7,0.8354243,0.16364856,0.00070049654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001552202,0.000006911439,0.000004495044,0.000037012796,0.00008316895,0.0000023145114,0.00031338428,6.6158066e-7,9.4727915e-7,0.002048084,0.9971465,0.00020129477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002108708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022641676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83349794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004084547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012973113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1563553261","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511617393","title":"The Gender of Constitutional Jurisprudence","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Adjudication; Constitution; Political science; Law; Constitutional law; Democracy; State (computer science); Constitutional court; Politics","score_opus":0.03507566743936148,"score_gpt":0.2465178181390853,"score_spread":0.21144215069972383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1563553261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000017224223,0.0010370754,0.00047245997,0.00008459459,0.00044975386,0.00026263695,0.00016480852,0.000043536606,0.99746794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011683341,0.00068824703,0.000020092959,0.00003897674,0.0002847497,9.0207425e-7,0.000008930204,0.000004277302,0.9872705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874437,0.00007940803,0.00015047433,0.00022082496,0.00055324764,0.0002516511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899715,0.00021658458,0.00018827156,0.000168187,0.00033851495,0.000091287475],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022426675,0.00015232876,0.00021603909,0.000045641515,0.0018398376,0.000029218249,0.0005656413,0.0001987751,0.0000029963464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059345333,0.00013893138,0.0001707433,0.000020830676,0.010371612,0.000059230533,0.00021113877,0.0002492456,0.0000077935465],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024454692,0.000007436988,0.000006332525,0.000011718453,0.00010608827,0.00002924727,0.00025302573,0.000005036231,0.0000014285462,0.9595705,0.039810378,0.00017432091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017062356,0.000008757887,0.00004509637,0.00008186701,0.000094696814,0.0000016190351,0.00031871797,3.256624e-7,0.000013361008,0.0014073008,0.9977019,0.00015577888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019656357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010522795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95816326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008275212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068872296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1564250760","doi":"10.26522/ssj.v3i2.1017","title":"Justice as Told by Judges: The Case of Litigation over Local Anti-Immigrant Legislation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Social Justice","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Law; Political science; Enforcement; Economic Justice; Legislation; Context (archaeology); Politics; Rhetoric; Immigration law; Narrative; Immigration reform; Sociology","score_opus":0.05177758798735344,"score_gpt":0.38271059481678776,"score_spread":0.33093300682943433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1564250760","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.704646,0.013844102,0.00069630024,0.026747793,0.0028970186,0.00084598386,0.000080929494,0.00011172471,0.25013015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99524224,0.0021103544,0.000023610573,0.0012202066,0.0011975783,0.000014872157,0.0000036789925,0.0000041306594,0.00018332274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998517,0.00023992512,0.00033439495,0.00021049523,0.00038624514,0.00031198116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988369,0.00058675674,0.00016187251,0.000078352015,0.00030134243,0.000034771838],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007562051,0.00013542672,0.00027632684,0.00004035586,0.002320104,0.000024202029,0.00015502541,0.00009892666,0.000018051607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011773746,0.00010949817,0.00007879785,0.0005776678,0.0020460915,0.00019500515,0.00005619083,0.00017178632,0.0000117888785],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004874514,0.00014309531,0.00033224525,0.000054125463,0.00010224623,0.000111355876,0.11274974,0.000057561578,0.00008588993,0.8302621,0.03938195,0.016670946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007340458,0.00012418344,0.005216974,0.00010668185,0.0010444995,0.00001292861,0.8443732,0.000052310617,0.00007290364,0.098495126,0.0493871,0.00038005208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009948272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007887074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.731767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021322978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013294084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99897873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1565054210","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1014","title":"Patterning Rights Constitutionalism: Thirty Years with the Charter","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Charter; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.01619015104397401,"score_gpt":0.24381005635812508,"score_spread":0.22761990531415108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1565054210","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024249855,0.0002856851,0.0005961228,0.016854934,0.0004171791,0.00016778015,0.00000464146,0.0000360697,0.95738775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99695903,0.000040201627,0.00015318352,0.0015434314,0.00089402276,0.000013756562,0.0000010170469,0.0000034538552,0.00039190386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988265,0.00012145692,0.00013240783,0.00011152368,0.00051714055,0.00029094977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994445,0.00008104,0.000096162745,0.00006917088,0.00019100169,0.00011813965],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035440057,0.00009113611,0.00011117533,0.000018578656,0.0035135774,0.00027796638,0.00023721116,0.000045686833,0.0011845084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013789472,0.000050540886,0.00006160931,0.00008580668,0.0014182184,0.0003652283,0.000031387583,0.0002779332,0.00039226818],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040902196,0.000016162901,0.0019659514,4.483203e-7,0.0000491062,0.00002439324,0.0013064144,0.0000085821275,0.000010467981,0.9915653,0.0044497214,0.0005994033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053415005,0.000055288125,0.025640098,0.00009307992,0.000055129316,0.00018793558,0.0033429507,0.0000067756696,0.000016520342,0.5394798,0.4302919,0.0002963649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12362947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16796672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9727092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058329057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012448484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1565387334","doi":"","title":"Canada: Protecting Rights in a ‘Worldwide Rights Culture’ - An Empirical Study of the Use of Foreign Precedents by the Supreme Court of Canada (1982–2010)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Charter; Political science; Jurisprudence; Fundamental rights; Judicial review; Human rights; International human rights law","score_opus":0.026225507154744962,"score_gpt":0.2685935236772126,"score_spread":0.24236801652246764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1565387334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964867,0.00023370034,0.000010367073,0.0011906397,0.00015949062,0.000716003,0.000010146008,0.0000024901688,0.0011904243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99936897,0.000024987594,0.0000050697554,0.00004662496,0.000079429585,0.00001942282,4.5483395e-7,0.0000032145126,0.00045184608],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99704623,0.000534917,0.00044079177,0.00013304058,0.00095395814,0.0008910665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898833,0.00014496059,0.0003622978,0.000126986,0.00031020233,0.00006722827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010230038,0.000116278185,0.00024450547,0.00002795051,0.0011660862,0.000022207876,0.00050467736,0.000043069173,0.00001805636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020107687,0.00006032023,0.00005016835,0.00034733675,0.0002648014,0.00019457456,0.000050200153,0.0008226131,1.2345733e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002732173,0.002094166,0.69516647,0.000022000371,0.0015837454,0.00000965887,0.038417347,0.0012283425,0.0007746548,0.22257708,0.036161624,0.0016917092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030821222,0.0014055326,0.27059236,0.00028588233,0.00027098236,0.000060893017,0.12256379,0.00021377944,0.0014095686,0.55741686,0.041912425,0.00078577275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9995921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42457408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012791423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011240677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9943647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1569720508","doi":"","title":"Morality Policies, Legal Mobilisation, and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: Does Policy Determine Politics and Patterns of Judicialisation?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Politics; Morality; Political science; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.008026571699745822,"score_gpt":0.2623856916461283,"score_spread":0.2543591199463825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1569720508","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9821827,0.00043513643,0.000017744625,0.015614336,0.00010522918,0.00012483947,0.000030588642,0.0000035343455,0.0014859333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983109,0.0009034165,0.000007476926,0.00015626906,0.00053407217,0.000002752876,0.0000010127121,0.0000026985963,0.000081376485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987647,0.00010887605,0.00022561262,0.00008925769,0.00021058375,0.00060095434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941224,0.00010242766,0.00013669177,0.00006128325,0.00017213389,0.000115207324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012223945,0.00007846602,0.00017110165,0.000098901306,0.0010975273,0.00005203672,0.000099756006,0.00005976388,0.000008180805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020085537,0.000047969297,0.000030647065,0.00009309412,0.0022683903,0.00014780485,0.000024409035,0.00036991033,1.3423201e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007750206,0.0000073816045,0.04238986,0.000002128197,0.000038151935,2.1159073e-7,0.003987473,1.32168e-7,0.00003437391,0.95295846,0.000004994228,0.0005690616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005001033,0.000041178766,0.080747396,0.000010272615,0.000039621016,0.000029981702,0.004157438,0.000005960913,0.000036741123,0.9120354,0.0023210845,0.000074798976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9472726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9876982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040923063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014976085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026070601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84414035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1569721685","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1167","title":"Interjurisdictional Immunity: The Pendulum Has Swung","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Supreme court; Federalism; Law; Political science; Legislation; CLARITY; Politics","score_opus":0.08908984185563963,"score_gpt":0.31969211829538574,"score_spread":0.23060227643974612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1569721685","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001991822,0.26054257,0.00008374698,0.08144108,0.0010049847,0.00067282753,0.000017505716,0.00013266812,0.65411276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8426926,0.14968471,0.000031264924,0.006232579,0.0005304831,0.00005345891,0.0000074290615,0.000005531934,0.00076189934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865216,0.00025196408,0.00023383356,0.00013981306,0.0004817695,0.00024046745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937624,0.00013206401,0.000068978654,0.00017064881,0.00018807809,0.0000640018],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075776415,0.000103291175,0.00021772705,0.000011100019,0.0037580736,0.000035136993,0.0003584228,0.000036530255,0.00093503535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018178487,0.00006986625,0.0001571052,0.00021899708,0.0020396248,0.0001592506,0.000102141596,0.0001924387,0.00040070404],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029336018,0.00003783853,0.00071102445,0.000040402203,0.000052593896,0.000008227799,0.000957441,2.8664766e-7,0.0000033711474,0.94519186,0.051496003,0.0014980172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051186413,0.000010092343,0.0011340029,0.00044709115,0.000039988823,0.000013839721,0.00017914103,4.971032e-7,0.0000023063938,0.007536918,0.99049103,0.000093876995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012498777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057938206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93899506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000073113086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030079516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1570396721","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjm022","title":"Courts and Federalism: Judicial Doctrine in the United States, Australia, and Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius-the Journal of Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Doctrine; Judicial review; Law; New Federalism; Politics","score_opus":0.045887533685036036,"score_gpt":0.28397397562514687,"score_spread":0.23808644194011083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1570396721","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9027671,0.0006829857,0.0000075846706,0.094061896,0.00030560046,0.00012254684,0.000008718363,0.0000045943757,0.0020389638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921634,0.003005095,0.000016405542,0.004058513,0.0004884229,0.0000022711931,0.0000031237864,0.000003672735,0.0002590927],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981111,0.0003852956,0.00036105607,0.00009074214,0.0007308547,0.0003209485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989367,0.00039425492,0.00021323428,0.00006325004,0.0002652285,0.00012732006],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013999644,0.00012160228,0.00022106907,0.00010030768,0.0020191686,0.00018364427,0.00027067956,0.00004632136,0.000026812044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025435613,0.00007183861,0.000032941378,0.0002569559,0.00075570797,0.00027965984,0.00004663342,0.00034192085,5.781397e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036820438,0.00023552577,0.09282027,0.000019805251,0.00033528137,0.0011431609,0.07712254,0.00024896383,0.00002551996,0.23855458,0.58698374,0.0021423833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010543069,0.000098810306,0.27849445,0.0000456724,0.00006079221,0.00069521455,0.013032436,0.000014361345,0.0000056045587,0.020290112,0.6859592,0.0002490095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.967735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9207377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21826448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012035442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065418315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1570976271","doi":"","title":"The Promise and Limits of Citizens' Assemblies: Deliberation, Institutions and the Law of Democracy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Political science; Referendum; Democracy; Supreme court; Legislature; Jurisprudence; Law; Election law; Deliberative democracy; Politics; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.024111578717143776,"score_gpt":0.29726070861731035,"score_spread":0.2731491299001666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1570976271","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8527824,0.06376442,0.0010416367,0.027472915,0.00031079687,0.00039354537,0.000003838369,0.000013560223,0.054216824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9749463,0.024610566,0.000017328222,0.00007679877,0.00020378988,0.000004595693,1.7851676e-7,0.0000017759745,0.00013863614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988736,0.00015133207,0.0001874868,0.000046078083,0.00020605836,0.00053544797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993307,0.00028898715,0.00012919657,0.000042824347,0.00016610013,0.000042187152],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023179154,0.000052188076,0.00010580372,0.000016824195,0.0024611661,0.000035725563,0.00010143262,0.0000287449,0.0000019651175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033402254,0.000028071556,0.00003723601,0.0001143585,0.0020245924,0.00020227616,0.000025604188,0.000276282,6.3392116e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028962439,0.000014117676,0.0018843797,0.0000010580544,0.00006396194,3.5384776e-8,0.00209108,0.0000010470104,0.000033253848,0.9926388,0.0000315838,0.0032116764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005738857,0.00004164342,0.003155428,0.00001734971,0.00006771606,0.000031634114,0.013252959,0.0000028952484,0.000050608454,0.971684,0.011063243,0.00005868269],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011079035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01132398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12216388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000070429895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010887948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1571018866","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2161768","title":"Thuyết cân đối trong vấn đề giải thích các quyền về hiến pháp: so sánh giữa Canada, Liên Hiệp các Vương Quốc Anh và Singapore và kinh nghiệm cho Vìệt Nam (Proportionality in Interpreting Constitutional Rights: A Comparison between Canada, the United Kingdom and Singapore and Its Implications for Vietnam)","year":2012,"lang":"vi","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Chemistry","score_opus":0.04096541350070895,"score_gpt":0.3192811625929438,"score_spread":0.2783157490922349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1571018866","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9250708,0.03142281,0.001532498,0.03682809,0.0011448483,0.0017165256,0.0007625954,0.00004280135,0.0014790185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963134,0.00090271095,0.000046305977,0.00058093894,0.0017518074,0.00009135838,0.00016652486,0.000026064774,0.00012087723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99242824,0.0006505539,0.0014739808,0.00068766467,0.0011353453,0.0036242262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99628174,0.0010418537,0.0010774338,0.0002260718,0.0007323401,0.00064054277],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004334342,0.0006371322,0.00091134396,0.00022080404,0.007559033,0.0003304455,0.0006327866,0.00029994035,0.000049622937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008243673,0.0005189278,0.00019009966,0.00094800803,0.0024229093,0.0006308063,0.0002217378,0.0025192862,0.0000018907211],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011555838,0.00017681965,0.34701335,0.000037348338,0.00066831225,0.0000043543914,0.00220027,0.000114944865,0.00006336328,0.64348555,0.0016251598,0.0044949856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041070655,0.0004346852,0.5514025,0.0012699998,0.0013761361,0.0005028448,0.029648716,0.0012020986,0.00007801765,0.16166471,0.24576674,0.0025464473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9197478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99215853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48182082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006403618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032127906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1571866199","doi":"","title":"Legal Positivism? What Are You Talking About? ('De Quel Positivisme Parlez-Vous?')","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Legal positivism; Typology; Ideology; Epistemology; Sociology; Order (exchange); Law; Legal realism; Philosophy; Political science; Legal research; Politics","score_opus":0.011995759599280323,"score_gpt":0.25988105344902124,"score_spread":0.24788529384974092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1571866199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8824919,0.040368035,0.004105642,0.020816457,0.0011719017,0.0002769255,0.000006299568,0.00017957769,0.050583266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95647836,0.039566025,0.000030090738,0.0006445656,0.0015761403,0.000007725731,0.0000017825424,0.000015280872,0.0016800389],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99592006,0.00025721654,0.0002706146,0.00023908525,0.00065197714,0.0026610524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992344,0.00008772586,0.0002067235,0.00008826766,0.00020118662,0.00018173772],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015507772,0.00019310253,0.000262801,0.00009627074,0.0036319206,0.00027412066,0.00032506528,0.0001161731,0.000033244876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014001458,0.00018110118,0.00020073731,0.0003004905,0.0006624079,0.0011570678,0.000053478565,0.0013523923,0.00005095682],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004756256,0.00009733409,0.011895375,0.0000016973863,0.0001974522,0.00014061114,0.0038766642,0.000018402916,0.00016942715,0.96956795,0.00027182134,0.013715685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011805927,0.00038413654,0.052148033,0.0003026889,0.00014704285,0.0033225596,0.09061738,0.000017670225,0.0001360282,0.7853625,0.06542488,0.0009565144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073643783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0148762185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1842055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017125265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004966112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99924564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1574715162","doi":"","title":"The Supreme Court's Understanding of the Democratic Self-Government, Advancement of Truth and Knowledge and Individual Self-Realization Rationales for Protecting Freedom of Expression: Part I - Taking Stock","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fondation pour la recherche juridique","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Jurisprudence; Law; Democracy; Political science; Government (linguistics); Expression (computer science); Freedom of thought; Law and economics; Sociology; Human rights; Politics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.05728068230840502,"score_gpt":0.29420965297263313,"score_spread":0.2369289706642281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1574715162","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9360803,0.014654307,0.020244565,0.0017034862,0.0015198691,0.00432159,0.00020472848,0.00007721122,0.021193944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989449,0.00021237465,0.0005791911,0.000010291502,0.0001760171,0.000045698063,0.0000013584142,0.0000038666726,0.000026326732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989352,0.00016127102,0.00025010193,0.00009724213,0.00039779616,0.0001583802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988288,0.0006121748,0.0003584119,0.000068049434,0.00008978537,0.00004277028],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009793305,0.00007447813,0.0001334,0.00000951625,0.0014483841,0.000023874944,0.0001025445,0.00003819354,0.0000056234976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004563321,0.000048854006,0.000033474982,0.000102381964,0.00041034803,0.00021101425,0.00009123536,0.00005622929,8.0967745e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024663976,0.000076613745,0.05103598,0.00007261496,0.00008892637,1.7221183e-8,0.006902372,0.00001728262,0.0005407705,0.94085467,0.00011423499,0.00027185513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008370412,0.0009487008,0.17338452,0.0043728435,0.001714913,0.0000070187816,0.23777036,0.0012319027,0.047770012,0.38470855,0.13809398,0.0016267741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021719058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015042231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5561461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009298989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010532124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1577710887","doi":"","title":"Representing People and Not Interests: A Rawlsian Conceptualization of the Right to Vote","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Conceptualization; Democracy; Law and economics; Political science; Politics; Law; Economic Justice; Reinterpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Original position; Constitutional law; Veil of ignorance; Political philosophy; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011237846854839332,"score_gpt":0.28432381848832733,"score_spread":0.273085971633488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1577710887","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9438927,0.0017367863,0.0036642305,0.028869426,0.00025811285,0.00019635727,0.0000013594889,0.00001758388,0.021363435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99841005,0.0006233121,0.000013360399,0.0002973685,0.00021757082,7.2996414e-7,1.3641915e-7,0.0000016084779,0.0004358793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890417,0.000098293815,0.00014645173,0.00008480275,0.00022849401,0.0005377729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996943,0.00003532774,0.00009327269,0.000048050442,0.000089033005,0.00004004165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076725817,0.000048468057,0.00009222443,0.00002898794,0.0007332033,0.00003201482,0.0001520913,0.000025779647,0.0000053063573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002996892,0.000033695826,0.00004464877,0.00023148743,0.00015565581,0.00008981998,0.000031024254,0.00025912042,0.0000013322178],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013803317,0.000010951389,0.0067800325,4.4983463e-7,0.000019916211,2.5832054e-7,0.0046561034,0.0000079711735,0.00034445513,0.9817683,0.00008224051,0.0063155363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000388528,0.00017501245,0.052408636,0.000088302055,0.00004286402,0.00003499978,0.023874823,0.000016321517,0.0006369078,0.9101478,0.012016765,0.00016906613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017956804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056233265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07162051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017205712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006134427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96098804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1577809066","doi":"","title":"Doucet-Boudreau, Dialogue and Judicial Activism: Tempest in a Teapot?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Jurisdiction; Political science; Tempest; Judicial review; Government (linguistics); Judicial activism; Separation of powers; Constitution; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012400464073289787,"score_gpt":0.27760833242022226,"score_spread":0.2652078683469325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1577809066","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91019654,0.0077642105,0.00026750652,0.01699034,0.00035234579,0.00021675129,0.0000023582204,0.00005016544,0.06415975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867594,0.011790488,0.000012420268,0.00030283563,0.0009639003,0.0000029947175,6.975245e-7,0.0000039003953,0.00016335405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976604,0.00012567411,0.0001963453,0.00016515695,0.00031569082,0.0015367566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996661,0.00006221057,0.00007979191,0.00004499842,0.000052433687,0.00009449443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014344457,0.00011338115,0.00019393834,0.000109721426,0.0009447862,0.000072821575,0.00015788662,0.000081548016,0.00001235277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017840572,0.00010214674,0.00005564762,0.00028774614,0.0002990721,0.00024626657,0.00002018719,0.0009525724,0.000013040034],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047573165,0.00007269767,0.0052725375,3.7683404e-7,0.000027256974,0.000010502183,0.0016803427,0.0000019195604,0.00008236862,0.93282914,0.00008419251,0.05989109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005163314,0.00018884247,0.032134023,0.000022715658,0.000017528417,0.00005348533,0.005577063,0.0000015837348,0.00000860177,0.9538482,0.007464991,0.00016663811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0080660805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08235481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07656284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006564842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022765645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99853927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1578089255","doi":"10.7202/040265ar","title":"Judicial Power and the Charter: Canada and the Paradox of Liberal Constitutionalism de Christopher Manfredi, Toronto, Oxford University Press, 2 édition, 2001, XVII, 276 p.","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Politique et Sociétés","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Charter; Political science; Power (physics); Law; Humanities; Philosophy; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.024208070188132227,"score_gpt":0.3051134867957632,"score_spread":0.280905416607631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1578089255","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06862316,0.05979153,0.00011252495,0.30718824,0.0024474345,0.0007832577,0.00065294676,0.00003226772,0.5603686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92379886,0.068433955,0.000022238744,0.0033271818,0.00061496993,0.00001231072,0.0000080801165,0.0000056135423,0.0037767603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998006,0.00071655033,0.00024649568,0.00021247045,0.00036388126,0.00045462218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987321,0.00066494994,0.00016683633,0.00011274412,0.00017342919,0.00014997946],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008436658,0.00018208027,0.00034430728,0.000008705429,0.0013077391,0.000037525286,0.00020795324,0.00013823561,0.001103377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016118029,0.00013585464,0.00011072731,0.000090646055,0.010147377,0.00027903734,0.000121028206,0.00022083017,6.164694e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001770537,0.00003192213,0.0018030728,0.0000086723485,0.00014589838,0.000015324369,0.003977671,0.000003583251,4.917644e-7,0.9399744,0.05363207,0.0002298053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002480466,0.000020176736,0.020564184,0.00006003904,0.00017001861,0.000037609065,0.008403179,0.000024323625,0.0000024959163,0.21331747,0.7547196,0.00020041606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96961826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82181144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85517573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045240592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013716868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579027523","doi":"","title":"Classical Liberalism Meets the New Constitutional Order: A Comment on Mark Tushnet","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitution; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Political science; Judicial review; Sociology","score_opus":0.032503338675555944,"score_gpt":0.28933969375296953,"score_spread":0.2568363550774136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579027523","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009532314,0.00049519807,0.00029358434,0.5243368,0.0018078435,0.00007561643,0.00001466765,0.000012145149,0.4720109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96957695,0.0006211603,0.0003274018,0.024253894,0.0028683876,0.000003062498,0.0000026912396,0.0000040214695,0.002342403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814767,0.00012373041,0.000369405,0.00011309556,0.0010581419,0.00018794781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987599,0.00038647605,0.00022753062,0.00007193738,0.0003983262,0.00015578065],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004430473,0.00011101024,0.00016596793,0.000055871005,0.00074793375,0.00011568845,0.00053090166,0.00005568593,0.001405956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036374043,0.000072502495,0.00015680486,0.00013605501,0.0018584104,0.00018938242,0.000060704577,0.0003371644,0.00012599131],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003881859,0.000110364505,0.000121870726,3.309665e-7,0.00011187429,0.000019189061,0.0005242565,0.000045351364,0.000006438154,0.8003565,0.1974924,0.0011725945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044503083,0.000059662663,0.00044657488,0.00005716354,0.000019960351,0.00004200536,0.00015252712,0.000025772744,0.00001583478,0.052286696,0.94636536,0.00008341445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041116076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037114357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96862376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018257624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002133093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579039961","doi":"","title":"Unconscious Parallelism: Constitutional Law in Canada and the United States","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscious mind; Parallelism (grammar); Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Computer science; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Parallel computing","score_opus":0.02160463035647291,"score_gpt":0.25290760488581365,"score_spread":0.23130297452934073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579039961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76796865,0.00034908476,0.00003314351,0.0067181634,0.00048056827,0.00055125065,0.00005996463,0.000024767973,0.22381437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99725616,0.00034920243,0.00013399318,0.0013651766,0.00013292766,0.0000070260407,0.00003940934,0.0000034194763,0.0007126989],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748313,0.00068233104,0.00033686557,0.00038884112,0.0007084942,0.00040031044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872386,0.00058147765,0.00013016589,0.00015893283,0.00022974526,0.000175826],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014620441,0.00018638866,0.00029269146,0.00018031358,0.0034064618,0.00035430543,0.0008819343,0.000109013585,0.000065144544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003078521,0.00017197864,0.000048666552,0.00083179417,0.005727579,0.0014145513,0.0004188405,0.000572251,0.00001004407],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025858288,0.000057092086,0.07223113,0.0000029466214,0.00003008493,0.00016136121,0.0013002261,0.006777941,0.0000030324147,0.91882396,0.0002230554,0.00013057076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039945655,0.000014716592,0.036190733,0.00018114626,0.000034741308,0.000038452792,0.011047975,0.00019705477,0.0000150461965,0.01628868,0.931559,0.00043785982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9809048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99388963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.931336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029206667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00617663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579513605","doi":"10.21991/c9sx0d","title":"The Politics of Hate Speech: A Case Comment on Warman v Lemire","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Law; Supreme court; Human rights; Statute; Charter; Political science; Politics; Constitutional right; Legitimacy; Sociology","score_opus":0.040232405356439634,"score_gpt":0.3080979706965263,"score_spread":0.26786556534008665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579513605","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044961087,0.009837715,0.009591789,0.16229154,0.01104541,0.002403376,0.0010499927,0.00043574176,0.75838333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946582,0.0003502095,0.0002204743,0.0036074559,0.0006221623,0.00008228889,0.000027544469,0.000007991015,0.00042370183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966615,0.00019861084,0.000659134,0.000297621,0.00090273,0.0012804057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977437,0.0007711349,0.00026963608,0.00033000746,0.00047038964,0.00041508212],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010563358,0.0003062971,0.00034842148,0.00014214542,0.009500431,0.00008828992,0.00040325415,0.00017900646,0.000116148076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00081400754,0.00024829636,0.00028222217,0.00042679405,0.017971015,0.0005033371,0.00020609786,0.00032391195,0.00024096128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042248932,0.00022995408,0.009250652,0.0000071514437,0.00012419172,0.00007148391,0.00045904348,0.000051651736,0.000013204604,0.9697273,0.017697664,0.0023254736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067277974,0.000059279428,0.0002595552,0.00011781204,0.000084518084,0.00059971097,0.013368431,0.00002326564,0.00029006964,0.0538496,0.93029547,0.00037949643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031894774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001416922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9496971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046435726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012986987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1580333504","doi":"10.3138/jcs.44.2.122","title":"Aboriginal Self-Government through Constitutional Design: A Survey of Fourteen Aboriginal Constitutions in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Politics; Context (archaeology); Law; Government (linguistics); Constitutional law; Sociology; Political science; History","score_opus":0.05309572315644309,"score_gpt":0.33433555027358064,"score_spread":0.2812398271171376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1580333504","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8569028,0.00804733,0.00082210876,0.013045433,0.008503979,0.00070941885,0.00091723073,0.000017946788,0.111033805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99456114,0.0031842717,0.0017149831,0.00022498838,0.00028117953,0.0000046611303,9.721649e-7,0.000003023826,0.000024793151],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760544,0.0001938071,0.0006038832,0.00013158214,0.0010029007,0.00046239147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997551,0.0006111453,0.00035323604,0.000079634716,0.0011297903,0.00027514517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014997863,0.00015053428,0.00047057203,0.00020171092,0.0007292813,0.000021064847,0.00027467374,0.000061296705,0.000064881264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006156338,0.00013487395,0.00006865389,0.0008461615,0.0022301357,0.00025881943,0.000011546226,0.00036930564,0.00000247363],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050067625,0.000055775847,0.29141623,0.000007965307,0.00042060614,0.00022386562,0.0031981224,0.00017591624,0.000027493725,0.6932471,0.010981667,0.0001952298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008792992,0.00008460424,0.28106314,0.00014156701,0.0001262785,0.0000704026,0.011703467,0.0000051170073,0.000077180644,0.005497332,0.7000218,0.00032979535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99754155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6890401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021233538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054151986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9512101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1580510701","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199269808.001.0001","title":"The Ultimate Rule of Law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":249,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Impartiality; Supreme court; Politics; Jurisprudence; Human rights; Rule of law; Judicial restraint; Sovereignty; Objectivity (philosophy); Democracy; Judicial activism","score_opus":0.026927895775433475,"score_gpt":0.24061808799266846,"score_spread":0.21369019221723498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1580510701","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000018358443,0.0002518622,0.000020874475,0.00008981807,0.00020574158,0.00019196939,0.00006909543,0.00004193489,0.99911034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026256049,0.00075534906,0.00002890228,0.00003210693,0.00013309077,5.2952635e-7,0.0000049154387,0.0000053561675,0.9964141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999177,0.00004819465,0.000100341094,0.0001425008,0.00032490745,0.00020707998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999415,0.000113866394,0.00014268978,0.00013120752,0.0001423772,0.000054861546],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014154383,0.00011328697,0.00018168669,0.000021254535,0.0017312018,0.000025599451,0.00045585222,0.00015385907,0.000008224548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012767046,0.00009778004,0.00013339493,0.000009750278,0.0025890346,0.000046133464,0.00017971503,0.00015927607,8.767024e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002399834,0.0000055810096,0.0000015149948,0.000008540661,0.00007459875,0.000009347635,0.0012345447,0.0000037716443,5.804898e-7,0.9962888,0.0013686046,0.0009801317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013266335,0.000010334851,0.000005546887,0.00006680394,0.000064002736,1.9129025e-7,0.00029798635,2.3037553e-7,0.000011875477,0.05420474,0.94510144,0.00010419618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008599991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043746643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9437328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041345574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011957657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1581033623","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781107565272","title":"Proportionality and the Rule of Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":101,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Human rights; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Appeal; Doctrine; Politics; Treaty; Constitutional law; Rule of law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02485090460507253,"score_gpt":0.23055432318057043,"score_spread":0.2057034185754979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1581033623","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000114269445,0.00027653988,0.000042183237,0.00023713648,0.00011093803,0.0002818941,0.00007655803,0.000025249698,0.9988352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018140292,0.00011440393,0.000009633669,0.00012877032,0.00020407334,8.576576e-7,0.000008092766,0.0000036324127,0.98139024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991569,0.00014281778,0.00011107952,0.00016306606,0.00030261904,0.00012350758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930525,0.0001694584,0.00016906399,0.00011820412,0.00018537941,0.000052657404],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037970967,0.000100804966,0.0002542682,0.00001976298,0.00079986185,0.000015696223,0.00023311835,0.00012549789,0.0000018870512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003266669,0.00008193963,0.000102681384,0.0000071471354,0.006221741,0.000034651257,0.00018300409,0.0001456772,0.0000019083523],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053057935,0.000004217263,0.00000610926,0.000019675588,0.00006580496,0.000003434828,0.0003798963,1.2964261e-7,3.8491982e-7,0.9845362,0.0147723295,0.00015876528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034528464,0.0000060501343,0.000060436894,0.000044460405,0.000114742215,5.235719e-7,0.000121843244,7.90099e-7,0.000005259871,0.0024844785,0.99672073,0.00009538133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01335807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022539719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98205173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008824463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003528323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99648273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1581729011","doi":"","title":"Une source paradoxale du droit constitutionnel canadien : les ententes intergouvernementales","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.010334740701726191,"score_gpt":0.19913831495344483,"score_spread":0.18880357425171865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1581729011","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.722435,0.025460033,0.047574207,0.04772693,0.002396613,0.0012458182,0.0008873581,0.00095809397,0.15131596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.962372,0.013494604,0.001254664,0.001970095,0.0012410199,0.000009867609,0.00019488898,0.00005574035,0.019407094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938875,0.00060358085,0.0007728156,0.0013281546,0.0010234229,0.0023845164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965425,0.00035650408,0.00059831573,0.0006064071,0.0004672417,0.0014290476],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006645459,0.0010886269,0.0010251211,0.00064819964,0.0072557386,0.0003582918,0.0021301971,0.0009894423,0.0013058552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019435871,0.0014129522,0.0008973156,0.002459967,0.0057077794,0.0024161995,0.0007212782,0.0010873786,0.00051873014],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012654878,0.0011597702,0.025062788,0.00011880606,0.00090765185,0.002934403,0.036895987,0.007141288,0.0004007773,0.81873435,0.06563094,0.03974776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0070997886,0.0005152955,0.031918194,0.0012906363,0.0011252511,0.0011618881,0.15493992,0.0038268378,0.00025117092,0.01703457,0.77867967,0.002156789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16397321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07783806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80169976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006291347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033752478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1582100464","doi":"","title":"Jurisprudence and (Its) History","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Meaning (existential); Duty; Subject (documents); Legal history; Law; Legal realism; Philosophy of law; Epistemology; Discipline; Subject matter; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Legal profession; Comparative law; Computer science","score_opus":0.09844479449475196,"score_gpt":0.3144304861538041,"score_spread":0.21598569165905213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1582100464","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03280416,0.0058418377,0.000024989857,0.002645614,0.000294377,0.000033338878,2.3647509e-7,0.000039009763,0.95831645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910567,0.00014503872,0.000043473694,0.0004006315,0.00013754124,0.000002308602,6.214607e-8,5.9525513e-7,0.008213663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996863,0.000016623795,0.000031647218,0.00005518872,0.00013840334,0.000071854425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99982905,0.000018020333,0.000007981887,0.000015877624,0.000055476376,0.00007358574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001708835,0.000021221009,0.000034232533,0.000008826836,0.00012588261,0.0000052950395,0.00004082485,0.000015598756,0.00011530938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012256458,0.000017908565,0.0000068323275,0.000029625375,0.00022763902,0.000077051045,0.000015524058,0.000019042067,0.00010598647],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013482808,0.0000045276374,0.0014129493,2.2800356e-7,0.0000018901052,0.00000108529,0.0037166036,8.756349e-8,0.000007702658,0.968469,0.025759947,0.00062460627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004340187,0.000006715041,0.0010409354,0.0000016395988,0.000002309718,2.6604306e-7,0.0029880365,0.0000028369934,0.000004318673,0.016473327,0.97939706,0.00003915036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054436494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024460622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95825255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009272669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019730248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8229206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1582500210","doi":"10.71781/2076","title":"La liberté d'expression et l'administration de la justice : le choc de deux paradigmes","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.009074216274922383,"score_gpt":0.22195923516022423,"score_spread":0.21288501888530184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1582500210","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48342404,0.024491535,0.00082455407,0.0017335803,0.0010123446,0.00033034774,0.00006434177,0.00016204476,0.4879572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95734936,0.0063443696,0.0008713296,0.00025347175,0.0004648279,0.000048705264,0.00015601487,0.00002691495,0.034484994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963413,0.0011413969,0.0004269828,0.00061336416,0.0008340887,0.00064285495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99789554,0.0007982392,0.0004371797,0.00021481447,0.0002221198,0.00043209287],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007107447,0.00047816936,0.00042798978,0.00017595117,0.014252775,0.00017493663,0.00048450768,0.00091489917,0.000074500625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028150892,0.00056247227,0.00035241048,0.00044922662,0.0016658303,0.00064420456,0.00012561596,0.00073710957,0.00006605252],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062779954,0.00076140853,0.0136449905,0.00018486411,0.00034003818,0.0021822057,0.1261232,0.0023805464,0.007460546,0.8392398,0.0026008866,0.004453724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002040558,0.00023472328,0.11923666,0.0014110119,0.0016413975,0.0013758392,0.18968812,0.001481599,0.00871878,0.01713733,0.65534633,0.0016876498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.107442565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025988467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8221025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049763583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066818115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1582644885","doi":"","title":"Charters and constitution-making: Comparing the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the European Charter of Fundamental Rights","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitution; Fundamental rights; Political science; Law; Ex post facto law; International human rights law; Human rights; Law and economics; Right to property; Sociology","score_opus":0.04301559450175222,"score_gpt":0.2996867057343621,"score_spread":0.2566711112326099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1582644885","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5504093,0.0006974315,4.2882016e-7,0.0017319969,0.00019808457,0.0005791871,0.000052398093,0.00000576595,0.4463254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99758524,0.0020257866,0.000011478352,0.000052471645,0.00017130017,0.000023324386,0.0000032489736,0.0000048644497,0.00012226419],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981779,0.0005176054,0.00035607687,0.00033976857,0.00022849192,0.00038016305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900955,0.0004075217,0.00015406914,0.0002123564,0.000085395666,0.00013111804],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021488818,0.00015413285,0.00037609247,0.00015846125,0.0015154755,0.00013418496,0.00030417476,0.00010196809,0.000031194984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008167914,0.00010257187,0.00005828374,0.00006528144,0.011497373,0.00007525158,0.0003739119,0.0004953741,0.0000016637964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015178669,0.00009907131,0.0881404,0.000121381745,0.0005830889,0.00003480489,0.060174048,0.000087206354,0.00001832253,0.8283652,0.00021562922,0.02200905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0069664866,0.00022942745,0.42630488,0.0024610653,0.00021472148,0.00006558983,0.032266773,0.0046049077,0.000035126406,0.23011102,0.29497156,0.0017684491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19480996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57849157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5982542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020494963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024086941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583214668","doi":"","title":"Where Did (Section) I Come from? The Debates Over the Limitations Clause at the Special Joint Committee of the Senate and the House of Commons on the Constitution, 1980-81","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Law; Constitution; Sketch; Legislative history; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Rhetorical question; House of Commons; Original intent; Constitutional interpretation; Constitutional law; Philosophy; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.018424312984282643,"score_gpt":0.23922177764897398,"score_spread":0.22079746466469133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1583214668","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80811036,0.0036957443,0.000039330007,0.17517598,0.0012080828,0.00056116027,0.000036979505,0.00001612824,0.011156268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913802,0.0058332,0.0000013314666,0.00094721117,0.0015503077,0.000019134231,6.445733e-7,0.0000074782197,0.00026046427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729234,0.0009687168,0.00036313268,0.00013069586,0.0006156551,0.00062948716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960096,0.0029909841,0.00039238663,0.000344392,0.0002276073,0.000035037414],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032568364,0.00015401666,0.00020713775,0.000019989735,0.00780924,0.000121224104,0.0008014878,0.00007542118,0.00006617573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00091141334,0.000050591723,0.00023022614,0.00032907724,0.008400804,0.000101111014,0.00018484879,0.0019653488,0.00001071465],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007589621,0.000042668467,0.00771185,6.232321e-7,0.00025334235,2.0229626e-7,0.005243948,0.000025737267,0.00016235784,0.9818901,0.0040201303,0.0005731382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012018918,0.00008916236,0.10460514,0.000070738046,0.00034371432,0.000054582655,0.03617999,0.000021072765,0.00020819972,0.7043559,0.15268481,0.00018479556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009833644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46594632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45611265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001891456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011441935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99675995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1585474295","doi":"10.9732/46","title":"Judicial Systems in the World – Judicial Portraits: A study through time and space","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Americanae (AECID Library)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Common law; Jurisprudence; Public law; Private law; Principle of legality; Procedural law; Sharia; Comparative law; Islam; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016595349838503484,"score_gpt":0.27952119981972173,"score_spread":0.26292584998121826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1585474295","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6893267,0.0014088049,0.000030353684,0.008328378,0.00040523466,0.0008344499,0.000012526362,0.00011474559,0.2995388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99586886,0.00012603181,0.000081804865,0.0019156901,0.0011313326,0.000029858897,0.0000037685822,0.000012652819,0.0008299782],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979117,0.0002890975,0.00034172402,0.0003263769,0.0006160039,0.0005150813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991286,0.0004561907,0.00014218986,0.00014666586,0.000028488319,0.00009786603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075539213,0.00017575268,0.00034172134,0.00013767484,0.0007848782,0.00008035387,0.00035907875,0.000045758617,0.00014627242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010627185,0.00013670654,0.000054649085,0.0017331421,0.0012850842,0.00059871364,0.00010301415,0.00020799169,0.000050444443],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000112976944,0.00048825511,0.52357537,0.000003301583,0.00011687131,0.0003401495,0.026232606,0.000009846883,0.000013201376,0.40914413,0.033184838,0.0067784335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041202066,0.00020360625,0.84560907,0.000031574822,0.000045643315,0.0000031489096,0.048222072,0.0000036712304,0.0000035418168,0.005261897,0.099897206,0.0003065624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40981466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037765075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40388224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004680709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023529764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9797932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1585984566","doi":"","title":"Extending Charter Benefits to Canada’s Poor","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Politics; Realm; Supreme court; State (computer science); Constitution; Legislature; Law; Social rights; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.012296813617492497,"score_gpt":0.2619481549154188,"score_spread":0.2496513412979263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1585984566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51676536,0.01567075,0.001291689,0.26957616,0.0019084121,0.00039518272,0.000010620878,0.000098919525,0.19428293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935028,0.0016662139,0.000014608072,0.0025254828,0.0009686534,0.0000014027946,3.706737e-7,0.0000028488414,0.00131763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99766725,0.000038154452,0.00013002515,0.000110966925,0.00041178954,0.0016418145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966544,0.000019465082,0.000043175776,0.000037797112,0.00008839179,0.00014571793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007246678,0.00007778098,0.000104702885,0.00004527505,0.0012816675,0.00004694148,0.0001939349,0.00002830584,0.00003577466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009190096,0.000069441,0.000044874847,0.00017088308,0.00004052788,0.000083701634,0.000012252162,0.00043752472,0.000023234998],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008821013,0.000011019931,0.00035093172,9.9595724e-8,0.000021463225,0.0000032269356,0.00040870695,0.000010326493,0.000028226847,0.9100775,0.00096630363,0.08811339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030838556,0.00025509807,0.016883459,0.000038150694,0.000030345396,0.0000739228,0.013272345,0.0000020163166,0.0000366671,0.6317015,0.3370425,0.0003555594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44105995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9779384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53687847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016410002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007871132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1586149894","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1063","title":"The Quasi-Revival of the Canadian Bill of Rights and Its Implications for Administrative Law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bill of rights; Jurisprudence; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Scope (computer science); Administrative law; Substantive rights; Fundamental rights; Substantive due process; Constitutional law; Constitutional right; Law and economics; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.08185562116440448,"score_gpt":0.36085192581595815,"score_spread":0.2789963046515537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1586149894","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027444873,0.3493883,0.00002925024,0.3489194,0.00045377767,0.004585315,0.0007387249,0.000022251981,0.2931185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98900795,0.010148668,0.000022467733,0.0006601068,0.0000476968,0.000061264596,0.0000016902329,0.0000017552371,0.00004842667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993655,0.00006631853,0.0002007401,0.00009020317,0.00013554459,0.00014169002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992666,0.00014984522,0.00010231771,0.0001091608,0.00030827418,0.0000637874],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004257557,0.000058568497,0.0001698298,0.0000045150837,0.0017844887,0.000012360394,0.00020810936,0.000026749673,0.0000073408205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015915958,0.00002810292,0.00008585746,0.00013636556,0.0011047329,0.00004828634,0.000020369596,0.00004046886,0.0000019046103],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.945503e-7,0.000009938844,0.000036061556,0.000040920833,0.000017988368,3.649987e-8,0.00018016658,9.8402914e-8,0.0000036844615,0.9991764,0.00034447233,0.00018937713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005068339,0.000019821942,0.00043196764,0.0004265706,0.000050802955,4.6033705e-7,0.000045618257,5.599742e-8,0.000040952367,0.30532715,0.6935667,0.000039264298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44515213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9542878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98626345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059489597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006449639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99951506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1588999869","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1274","title":"The Arbitrariness in “Arbitrariness” (And Overbreadth and Gross Disproportionality): Principle and Democracy in Section 7 of the Charter","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Proportionality (law); Charter; Law; Democracy; Supreme court; Normative; Political science; Politics; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01966685127228478,"score_gpt":0.2924388884956059,"score_spread":0.2727720372233211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1588999869","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90806377,0.051653713,0.000003999229,0.023362892,0.00022114122,0.0012175807,0.0000055688315,0.000011603788,0.015459752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9611278,0.03818247,0.0000063420734,0.00048324667,0.000062176136,0.000062587205,7.630244e-7,0.0000025034515,0.00007208378],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990956,0.00012926957,0.00026613445,0.00014735005,0.00020852283,0.00015312634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996095,0.00010330974,0.000085742366,0.00008869677,0.0000789663,0.000033810833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068610354,0.0000806403,0.00019338129,0.0000109079265,0.00047131875,0.00003969701,0.000092920585,0.00003402062,0.00001980624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001290033,0.000045944278,0.000028681581,0.00019512212,0.0009168676,0.000209576,0.0001032012,0.000113745264,0.0000013356726],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036090814,0.000025528778,0.22408831,0.0002245614,0.0000101217065,5.171895e-7,0.00026073636,1.4913539e-7,0.000015433128,0.77218115,0.00005878499,0.003131071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014076693,0.000006187403,0.8559436,0.0007180736,0.000018561494,0.000003402849,0.00011235078,0.000005976305,0.00000476672,0.07179758,0.07116668,0.00008201947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022638896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04145097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7003836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002387529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000063641324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98386943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1589149794","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2327537","title":"The Cross-Fertilization of Jurisprudence and the Principle of Proportionality: Process and Result from a Canadian Perspective","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Jurisprudence; Perspective (graphical); Law; Human fertilization; Political science; Law and economics; Mathematics; Sociology; Biology; Genetics","score_opus":0.007505088899732416,"score_gpt":0.3182876541956862,"score_spread":0.3107825652959538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1589149794","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9882732,0.0033190837,0.0000539261,0.00544665,0.00007425144,0.00014313891,0.000007177582,0.000002611781,0.0026799643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971519,0.002616859,0.0000053496815,0.00002358487,0.00012159282,0.0000045822444,3.353375e-7,0.0000016580861,0.00007411667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903685,0.0000722062,0.00016376596,0.00008156885,0.00026250377,0.00038311988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914324,0.00013657835,0.00015327572,0.00004505128,0.00047455326,0.000047275644],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019064256,0.0000440677,0.00008417872,0.000019171262,0.0013648467,0.000045631463,0.00013797705,0.000035200606,0.0000044112635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009560926,0.000024488592,0.000023489176,0.0001165381,0.0021224818,0.00009933922,0.000017922968,0.00040443172,2.0082099e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069594425,0.0000060434136,0.032481454,6.6196543e-7,0.000039024704,1.1944059e-7,0.0036442287,0.0000012128095,0.000034484136,0.96315765,0.0000010565203,0.00056446734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026045,0.000019964336,0.073718905,0.000007716512,0.000017048738,0.000005008036,0.012518419,0.000010162625,0.000038360427,0.91252494,0.0008457169,0.000033323595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.250639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87319624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6225573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001365428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048921295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1589651901","doi":"","title":"Constituting the Rule of Law: Fundamental Values in Administrative Law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Constitutionalism; Rule of law; Judicial review; Administrative law; Separation of powers; Constitutional law; Democracy; Precedent; Constitution; Politics","score_opus":0.1168773350146406,"score_gpt":0.3941967718101504,"score_spread":0.2773194367955098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1589651901","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14435665,0.0006299467,0.0000030343563,0.004590976,0.00009969504,0.00009430596,0.0000030526278,0.00001394919,0.8502084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987185,0.000054965963,0.00004375729,0.00036077265,0.00008753873,0.000005705365,2.7215324e-7,0.000001205991,0.00072727475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994238,0.00006865142,0.00009650696,0.00007948255,0.00018802843,0.00014350592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997069,0.00015004113,0.000044140834,0.000044827524,0.00003012079,0.000023927854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021589303,0.000048096274,0.00009221899,0.000008924584,0.0005995506,0.000018932747,0.00009940645,0.000024705965,0.00025418337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000061766455,0.00003565384,0.000030335092,0.00010434232,0.0024656814,0.00006305608,0.00003089376,0.00006476937,0.000034768454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039157453,0.000031650372,0.0013266498,0.0000010338879,0.000008332649,0.0000026549155,0.041898143,0.0000025491595,0.000037606806,0.95639855,0.00014015977,0.0001487851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086255366,0.0001378833,0.004239137,0.00017792276,0.00004477716,0.0000045356264,0.36420783,0.00004045685,0.003164871,0.19313239,0.4335666,0.0004210328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039891914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018638244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85436183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041186395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046252575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99926907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590026019","doi":"","title":"The Case for the Legislative Override","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Legislation; Politics; Political science; Sovereignty; Democracy; Opposition (politics); Parliamentary sovereignty; Law; Law and economics; Judicial review; Sociology","score_opus":0.047892946942780144,"score_gpt":0.3418737048328157,"score_spread":0.2939807578900356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1590026019","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017324791,0.0011275398,0.0013724903,0.0926775,0.00022953734,0.00024065936,0.0000043227337,0.000024112607,0.90259135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98714364,0.00019490308,0.000070964,0.000804803,0.00076840975,0.000036111902,7.85783e-8,8.907639e-7,0.01098019],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996809,0.00002112019,0.000048500537,0.00004650954,0.00008218232,0.00012081472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989311,0.00094568386,0.000015194859,0.00003839674,0.00005345018,0.000016169248],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032360145,0.000026845304,0.00002758445,0.0000026786495,0.0037998625,0.000042648262,0.000084807536,0.00001154343,0.000046929206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002130606,0.000011540843,0.000035838613,0.000052485706,0.00055342395,0.000058303704,0.000018311219,0.00002601071,0.000026074404],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034205052,0.0000030700335,0.000043115364,5.3241333e-8,0.000013442771,0.0000015538194,0.0025323953,0.0000063236275,5.0530036e-7,0.9511285,0.014025868,0.032241743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041129726,0.0000041245557,0.0001521052,5.460148e-7,0.0000066438997,0.0000024937713,0.009202555,0.000050461527,0.0000050692165,0.023870097,0.9666407,0.000024057232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019145746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24048036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98541117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027706577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006963513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590642029","doi":"","title":"Draconian But Not Despotic: The 'Unwritten' Limits of Parliamentary Sovereignty in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Legislation; Political science; Law; Legitimacy; Sovereignty; Judicial review; Democracy; Constitutional review; Constitutionalism; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Constitution; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.011949766848870528,"score_gpt":0.24458419398108736,"score_spread":0.23263442713221683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1590642029","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98179704,0.0006542164,0.000016637707,0.0070155617,0.00041029992,0.000097649034,0.000006843847,0.0000038356475,0.009997936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99756694,0.0014604937,0.000010807455,0.00046984403,0.00035446597,0.0000032411658,4.5790972e-7,0.000003845696,0.00012987916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979549,0.000104268816,0.00022999379,0.000098337194,0.00044723367,0.0011652588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995075,0.00015312355,0.00011814252,0.000071885646,0.00008491526,0.00006442337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013429114,0.00008299995,0.00014007693,0.00003232673,0.00066210993,0.000021984071,0.0003379564,0.00003945315,0.00009051303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015454672,0.000058967053,0.00005571392,0.00017152219,0.00034046444,0.00010905764,0.000024976845,0.0012912775,0.0000042769666],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043838292,0.000035943915,0.07268301,0.0000011075393,0.00008091372,0.000008268608,0.00065851,0.000014019025,0.00043656805,0.9056276,0.00012197008,0.020288218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006983465,0.00009707257,0.10940318,0.000032041495,0.000053330994,0.000069483394,0.12121598,0.000012258483,0.00059558934,0.75996,0.0075772614,0.0002854864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97463435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14566766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011324371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020271476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98528266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591156935","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1185","title":"Judicial Review and American Constitutional Exceptionalism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Exceptionalism; Political science; Judicial activism; Law; Accountability; Judicial restraint; Politics; Constitutional review; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03989409783912067,"score_gpt":0.3084262071484708,"score_spread":0.2685321093093501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1591156935","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019474883,0.022890743,0.0004586039,0.017969672,0.00041722218,0.00014741035,0.000020346442,0.000044643777,0.95610386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94170064,0.052381977,0.0004011169,0.0041969283,0.0011400402,0.0000067991564,0.000002824859,0.0000033093065,0.00016638455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986495,0.00014194267,0.00024599218,0.00015071749,0.0005323395,0.00027952675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927163,0.000076648284,0.00014471066,0.000049962437,0.00023608093,0.00022096887],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045721623,0.000108784036,0.00025733493,0.000031125095,0.0042891162,0.00004014459,0.00013804593,0.00003664924,0.0004965721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015120412,0.0000972721,0.00008979434,0.0001694334,0.008248162,0.00023133692,0.000042405583,0.00023302292,0.00007050655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058199425,0.00002892218,0.0015996327,0.0000048593315,0.000036315752,0.000044819797,0.00023163557,0.0000010305758,0.000005013791,0.99142563,0.005468752,0.0011475926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043771142,0.00006782896,0.010662035,0.00028402352,0.00014494733,0.0013894553,0.0006617248,6.7700876e-7,0.0000028529116,0.35012415,0.6358665,0.0003580457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03871239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034024607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9559375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008822963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000383759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1593573968","doi":"","title":"International Law in the Interdisciplinary Mirror","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; International law; Political science; Law; Doctrine; Dilemma; Discipline; Legal doctrine; Sociology; Legal education; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016857177677966736,"score_gpt":0.3266506288215879,"score_spread":0.30979345114362117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1593573968","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07112861,0.0014929518,0.00021251763,0.12409615,0.00054080546,0.00010929676,0.0000010433799,0.000019814037,0.8023988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99654347,0.0014791897,0.000014948779,0.0010757282,0.00046158937,0.000002311288,7.0082564e-7,0.000001449691,0.00042062663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985335,0.000106117324,0.00013547433,0.000078974634,0.0003288026,0.00081716944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99980253,0.000041823325,0.000045790202,0.000039968785,0.000045844405,0.000024042021],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016909683,0.000056305922,0.00006678782,0.000041799143,0.00082735217,0.00006477515,0.00041625884,0.000030951174,0.000034390458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039964474,0.000038378996,0.00006315622,0.00014479288,0.0002011494,0.00017967759,0.00003061243,0.00071297353,0.000025808553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016760852,0.000047502162,0.00041780755,6.352698e-8,0.000015054702,0.0000056775934,0.0033142678,8.0414475e-7,0.000009739416,0.98499024,0.000116756724,0.011065327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014439179,0.000065211054,0.0037748674,0.0000079364,0.0000046542114,0.0000419383,0.025176987,0.0000013089308,8.5069576e-7,0.9283924,0.042336762,0.000052656436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012151615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047388963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92541486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005073976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061273866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9699937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1594513305","doi":"10.21991/c96665","title":"THE CANADIAN CHARTER AS A MODEL FOR ISRAEL'S BASIC LAWS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Appeal; Political science; Politics; Law; Phenomenon; Demographics; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.05953339464986374,"score_gpt":0.28356488204668673,"score_spread":0.224031487396823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1594513305","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016314352,0.0017872271,0.0574914,0.03469278,0.0039392086,0.0021904185,0.0006999159,0.00029824855,0.89726937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99114954,0.00020469351,0.00084953185,0.004329183,0.00038211295,0.0005799043,0.000054602868,0.000012510236,0.0024379457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965927,0.00008441484,0.00055182166,0.0005560268,0.0006885565,0.0015265042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977036,0.0002868033,0.00016889366,0.00033529583,0.0008576485,0.000647758],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000899873,0.00036159786,0.00032163758,0.00019846881,0.018331124,0.00024548452,0.00071999576,0.00029208965,0.00020781334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00097438064,0.0002998268,0.00036224563,0.0003969268,0.016979605,0.00066173525,0.00011522157,0.000289345,0.0005811801],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082912724,0.00005595021,0.0036573457,0.0000034973637,0.00011083159,0.000010202993,0.000757917,0.00008333798,0.0000068083687,0.9843827,0.009644708,0.0012038015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064114336,0.00003970036,0.00022181125,0.000046272915,0.000066754415,0.00003139832,0.0044889203,0.0013624387,0.000026058566,0.43457246,0.55806816,0.00043489362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17119098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7751904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9895181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076149707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011767608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1594935521","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511493683","title":"The Migration of Constitutional Ideas","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":312,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Variety (cybernetics); Jurisprudence; Constitutional law; Politics; Comparative politics; Political science; Comparative law; Constitutional review; Law; Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.02604646980348289,"score_gpt":0.24172097091701697,"score_spread":0.2156745011135341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1594935521","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000065538414,0.00073556416,0.00047847425,0.00011212712,0.0003991857,0.00025080223,0.00012537582,0.00003854949,0.9977944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007040231,0.00059589394,0.000015367907,0.000044749897,0.00034673393,5.366913e-7,0.000020326592,0.0000034048085,0.99193275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988954,0.00007770274,0.00015718755,0.0001709934,0.00048746116,0.00021124756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989055,0.0003036656,0.0001983298,0.00012743233,0.00038959074,0.000075475524],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034971634,0.00012646154,0.00018190006,0.000061547544,0.0015942821,0.000024923309,0.00034954608,0.00019883082,0.0000019152244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000066831875,0.00011628885,0.00014748427,0.000022396434,0.007240555,0.000054016695,0.000114536735,0.00019678967,0.0000070012197],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036013036,0.000005079469,0.00001275493,0.0000057364714,0.00007110223,0.00001410832,0.00011298606,6.5998927e-7,0.000002239412,0.87464005,0.1246413,0.000457986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000120521916,0.000010025067,0.000057269175,0.000058992046,0.00008008495,9.0275813e-7,0.00039271,8.834001e-7,0.000016559667,0.00066932477,0.99846786,0.00012488547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053228224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010171384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8739707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033716933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015588517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595693753","doi":"10.1515/9780773568891-009","title":"The Activist Constitution","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitution; Praise; Politics; Law; Political science; Judicial interpretation; Constitutional interpretation; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.02287278205712687,"score_gpt":0.24517329087946538,"score_spread":0.2223005088223385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595693753","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010697665,0.0000027291446,0.00014824852,0.0019524732,0.00028411543,0.00018375927,0.00001949459,0.00012053002,0.99621886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9132735,0.00044624836,0.000018691782,0.000111101486,0.00012586497,0.0000015884603,0.0000013538524,0.0000025539691,0.0860191],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990219,0.00015005616,0.000077750796,0.00017273639,0.00028602945,0.00029155723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944973,0.00014993089,0.000060382867,0.00011861736,0.00013005295,0.000091293514],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018992068,0.00009311295,0.00009919134,0.000030596693,0.0055978308,0.000048259393,0.00026757875,0.00006461045,0.000009568721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006516734,0.0000796705,0.000071492905,0.000058519934,0.0015112993,0.00014459605,0.0001239473,0.00012141186,0.000015323654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051360836,0.00001359508,0.00020122595,8.261526e-7,0.000034936165,0.000032215074,0.00023413582,0.0000045430675,0.000006213862,0.995395,0.001168382,0.0028575812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019067008,0.0000113511405,0.00043967,0.000010283932,0.000027245469,7.670586e-7,0.0018246375,0.0000016558944,0.00005778642,0.0019510414,0.99537337,0.00011154816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033073597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010923346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99420494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020057152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000102492806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1596617641","doi":"","title":"Xenophon Contiades (dir.), engineering Constitutional Change. A comparative Perspective on Europe, Canada and the USA","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Political science; Regional science; Geography; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.017113856512277804,"score_gpt":0.24573157313550262,"score_spread":0.2286177166232248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1596617641","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6809376,0.0033775594,0.0040598786,0.010645505,0.0008590719,0.0007397551,0.00006711771,0.000085975735,0.29922757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99776244,0.00011268018,0.000045472276,0.001228844,0.00032021498,0.000027992239,0.0000016616519,0.0000023411878,0.0004983794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922645,0.00010567749,0.00007881561,0.00014240845,0.00024088605,0.0002057651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992772,0.00044797108,0.00003705262,0.000048586226,0.00011510731,0.00007413609],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002848328,0.00009002321,0.00015668693,0.000024422041,0.00091022206,0.000039354494,0.0001051065,0.000044308636,0.000018721616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003987034,0.00007034794,0.000026607662,0.00014737826,0.003345232,0.000052166575,0.000018738257,0.0001883534,0.000008578884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032949985,0.0000058175156,0.00078086136,0.0000012404118,0.0000382771,0.0000032371033,0.006544475,0.000062409,0.000007338562,0.99192005,0.0003530024,0.00025035808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026379188,0.00012721242,0.1140606,0.0001472925,0.00013421518,0.000017423694,0.028641373,0.000772311,0.00012434922,0.07270298,0.77984273,0.00079156744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72955716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80651593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91921705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005355857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026544248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1597235307","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Reasoning in the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Constitution; Political science; Original meaning; Argument (complex analysis); Constitutional law; Context (archaeology); Meaning (existential); Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; History","score_opus":0.009949791904384914,"score_gpt":0.24641245994924177,"score_spread":0.23646266804485686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1597235307","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4337384,0.005040111,0.005927239,0.036883693,0.0009435526,0.00026697063,0.00000930783,0.000015509815,0.5171752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987787,0.0005600263,0.000013687679,0.00022452213,0.00031573937,0.0000019836043,5.890801e-7,0.0000010005483,0.00010374449],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822134,0.00019025826,0.00015944583,0.00006458244,0.00049217086,0.00087220187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995996,0.00015569055,0.00007818439,0.00004081788,0.00009455235,0.00003120288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032105409,0.00005194187,0.000098346456,0.000019099081,0.0007430974,0.000015964231,0.00023454738,0.000025200648,0.000019900208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045270723,0.00003724022,0.000035430243,0.00016257887,0.0006378542,0.00006760851,0.0000118985,0.0005130668,0.0000014279196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006508698,0.000011524788,0.012619412,3.8471194e-7,0.000017449109,9.855198e-7,0.00038535453,0.000037941176,0.0000036890442,0.9855522,0.00030053224,0.0010640171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036781403,0.000057274552,0.010916476,0.00003735405,0.000017774859,0.00006783059,0.028358119,0.000021035972,0.0000059990953,0.8392056,0.12081905,0.00012563838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5610934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97558016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5650403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006710824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011117865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1597968755","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.921470","title":"Three Perversities of Indian Law","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Computer science; World Wide Web; Internet privacy","score_opus":0.009749983756797937,"score_gpt":0.24091102075685153,"score_spread":0.23116103700005358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1597968755","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53900677,0.00957586,0.00070225744,0.0051898113,0.00034441156,0.00009969047,0.0000041521694,0.00003474211,0.44504234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981724,0.00081700034,0.000013529331,0.00004512857,0.00054230413,7.344817e-7,5.488217e-7,0.0000023416217,0.00040601718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986616,0.000031269552,0.00012194327,0.00005820805,0.00027555952,0.0008514279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99975854,0.000027387032,0.00007273887,0.00003093635,0.00008424175,0.000026178448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070213573,0.00005042198,0.00009262608,0.00003534707,0.0008782226,0.000020635442,0.00014410351,0.00003678601,0.000041268508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001701432,0.000045170953,0.00007593869,0.00011371493,0.00052946503,0.00012715877,0.000012662628,0.00033354832,0.000012692248],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064207984,0.000018047644,0.0050891605,6.647108e-7,0.00003134357,0.0000015188823,0.00044356857,0.000006116697,0.000009940679,0.9932559,0.000104046456,0.0010332561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012339086,0.000044119053,0.0024529048,0.00000760022,0.000011689914,0.00001110525,0.009283943,2.6319185e-7,0.000019462414,0.9759873,0.011999717,0.000058516456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.085702606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46756786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45916566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003645654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015936538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9203858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1598033492","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1151","title":"A Tale of Two Maps: The Limits of Universalism in Comparative Judicial Review","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Comparative law; Skepticism; Legitimacy; Judicial review; Political science; Polity; Public law; Scholarship; Judicial activism; Constitutional law; Judicial independence; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06963996063123865,"score_gpt":0.35813759444947346,"score_spread":0.2884976338182348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1598033492","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062055346,0.018642873,0.000029181885,0.009373853,0.00015632747,0.00017454643,0.000009417566,0.0000056188796,0.96540266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912428,0.007886533,0.00007450184,0.00058820983,0.00017224351,8.4529734e-7,5.718392e-7,0.0000012064106,0.00003304831],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988843,0.00023280633,0.0002904329,0.0000697209,0.00036290774,0.00015983338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938583,0.00009495895,0.00022960774,0.000054667402,0.00018890302,0.000046032488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006872497,0.00006679641,0.00027480614,0.00002778647,0.00046266508,0.000011293379,0.00023456791,0.000026597738,0.000060951257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006031686,0.000046917896,0.00009575018,0.0002603656,0.0007005818,0.00012811048,0.000016955575,0.00017623088,0.0000047540543],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001550891,0.00006246612,0.0002166851,0.0000055552423,0.00001989237,0.000008144872,0.0026918668,0.000015986205,0.000049467508,0.99500924,0.0008315871,0.0010736248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010286694,0.0002091741,0.0054791686,0.002389221,0.00012197132,0.000025382093,0.008405423,0.000004453993,0.00022284138,0.9461215,0.03578683,0.00020537543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047781132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18295261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9850373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050784907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016190276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95855975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1598251110","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1255","title":"Does the Observer Have an Effect?: An Analysis of the Use of the Dialogue Metaphor in Canada's Courts","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Legislature; Charter; Normative; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03993620394470653,"score_gpt":0.276923128913568,"score_spread":0.23698692496886148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1598251110","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98621464,0.00015871435,0.000017011826,0.0018606519,0.000550753,0.00016727888,0.00004159431,0.0000027589479,0.01098661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994357,0.000051025432,0.000018850644,0.0003224878,0.00013687574,0.0000019256079,8.956545e-7,0.0000032614128,0.000028958973],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978369,0.0007206494,0.00033032568,0.00010990045,0.0007435437,0.0002587185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879616,0.0004612196,0.00027481106,0.00021146904,0.00017277189,0.0000835479],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017846638,0.00009552653,0.00026652322,0.00003589386,0.0012031626,0.000047328755,0.0005615663,0.00004528024,0.000038574748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023372842,0.00003498567,0.0002103002,0.0004507533,0.00077529426,0.00018771931,0.00006973602,0.00024009711,1.5353959e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003943606,0.000066604975,0.7096362,0.0000018636661,0.00045038585,0.000008685877,0.002422828,0.0018402833,0.00009575929,0.28408504,0.0000491998,0.0013037178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015056935,0.00002431161,0.9840513,0.000025586267,0.00053296116,0.000001870556,0.0029471514,0.000083415885,0.00040931295,0.008844203,0.002843794,0.000085547166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9963174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27524084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021741516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052012823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92538756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1598579609","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Rights and New Technologies. A Comparative Study","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Fundamental rights; Emerging technologies; Constitutional law; Human rights; Law; Constitutional right; Constitutional review; Constitutional economics; Law and economics; Sociology; Constitution; Computer science","score_opus":0.07508775222730958,"score_gpt":0.31227479861683555,"score_spread":0.23718704638952598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1598579609","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012162012,0.015962264,0.0003531698,0.0005815946,0.00059839553,0.0012700995,0.001067625,0.00052989385,0.96747494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88484925,0.014302423,0.0009558167,0.00030747394,0.0034514158,0.00006238428,0.002716167,0.000027443413,0.0933276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979075,0.00014406587,0.00031005428,0.0007588612,0.000485752,0.00039376307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987502,0.00043310877,0.00018846721,0.0004173599,0.000053641965,0.00015720443],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003282143,0.00034996658,0.00056872744,0.00007865846,0.0027834435,0.00013051252,0.0010147293,0.000175794,0.0000107036685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001563181,0.00029266084,0.00003737492,0.00015315677,0.0044640396,0.00028340568,0.0012736758,0.0004482295,0.000019149504],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019709846,0.00034535117,0.01563162,0.0001163912,0.0015526059,0.00026755093,0.09518525,0.00005015042,0.000001795691,0.76655936,0.100429334,0.019663477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045104412,0.00008057142,0.0028241961,0.00050733046,0.00019649889,0.000022181803,0.008979003,0.00023842783,1.5441124e-7,0.07345438,0.9127129,0.00053333875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015585199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08168957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87414736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000069183305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060605176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1598964383","doi":"10.5539/ass.v11n16p315","title":"The Role of the Constitutional Council of the Republic of Kazakhstan on Human Rights","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Social Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Human rights; Law; Political science; Fundamental rights; Legitimacy; Parliament; Constitutional court; Enforcement; International human rights law; Politics","score_opus":0.06800841130425986,"score_gpt":0.31312667115698833,"score_spread":0.24511825985272848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1598964383","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06897879,0.000105867395,0.0000024635337,0.0036306735,0.0004557077,0.00017139716,0.000016832315,0.0000075277094,0.92663074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995009,0.0000021160483,0.000004478222,0.000055525587,0.00015507554,0.0000043854493,1.0372555e-7,9.569023e-7,0.0002764759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970357,0.00014765834,0.0002257668,0.0001383789,0.0022257727,0.00022675113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984411,0.000091303584,0.00026649126,0.00016462312,0.0009825008,0.0000539569],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022348987,0.000064209,0.00012147287,0.000016072678,0.0049791927,0.000030071094,0.0010178613,0.00004283612,0.000011081777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008622552,0.000031291693,0.00010207067,0.0009670853,0.030848123,0.00012430715,0.0001612164,0.000098046796,0.000002334019],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005289273,0.000030890766,0.0024126887,4.8542773e-7,0.000006854436,5.596023e-8,0.0070151435,5.2781746e-7,0.0002971396,0.98831785,0.00045662656,0.0014564589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018024397,0.000039468887,0.08561046,0.00003247248,0.0000170739,4.6153755e-7,0.015708307,8.814502e-7,0.0020190051,0.64985406,0.24644594,0.00009159951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056897546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007189567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9305221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040671675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004768439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599635435","doi":"","title":"Lawyers and the Rule of Law: Independence of the Bar, the Canadian Constitution and the Law Governing Lawyers","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Judicial independence; Political science; Independence (probability theory); Rule of law; Constitutional law; Constitution; Legal profession; Common law; Public law; Supreme court; Politics","score_opus":0.007080557357979105,"score_gpt":0.22679428997788248,"score_spread":0.21971373261990337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1599635435","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20768958,0.014820381,0.00024882014,0.09808,0.0006147027,0.00055273646,0.000015985452,0.000012428659,0.67796534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971963,0.0017160072,0.000002414334,0.00083506707,0.00012421206,0.000003651475,1.2862401e-7,0.0000020217035,0.000120176344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982983,0.00045265633,0.00017236754,0.00008326799,0.00042692534,0.00056650623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991777,0.00039598267,0.0001806934,0.000090313595,0.00010929785,0.000046016983],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004964022,0.00007427844,0.00014567554,0.000011205034,0.0037529734,0.0000645691,0.00033363668,0.00005130969,0.000006406988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003193657,0.000030904357,0.00007056731,0.00010131558,0.009659229,0.00010085336,0.000055585922,0.00070587645,0.0000012599004],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000350968,0.0000025174104,0.0015042413,0.0000010163509,0.00006050045,9.026256e-8,0.002833085,0.000017064858,0.0000052692567,0.9948451,0.000012793065,0.00068325613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013492099,0.00003090557,0.0023432802,0.00004172542,0.00011370435,0.000045960496,0.01610612,0.000041233972,0.000020186206,0.93080974,0.04900831,0.00008965156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6791601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.942156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78950673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022522369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020958225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1600717849","doi":"","title":"Troubling Patterns in Canadian Refugee Adjudication","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"York University Digital Library (York University)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Adjudication; Immigration; Political science; Appeal; Law; Refugee law; Legislation; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.02184454622439672,"score_gpt":0.18784776473571071,"score_spread":0.166003218511314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1600717849","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42497835,0.00006515709,0.00004139925,0.002042243,0.00011046679,0.00014086388,0.00022262482,0.00015820374,0.5722407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98378414,0.0002988408,0.00004753675,0.0001282033,0.00009625415,6.39837e-8,0.00008984641,0.000006672391,0.015548443],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883497,0.00007771188,0.000093212984,0.0002892184,0.00022983237,0.0004750776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993273,0.00006854579,0.000060723272,0.00011926123,0.000032392374,0.0003917622],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000039934133,0.0001273683,0.00015893833,0.0006380221,0.0014294737,0.00007644892,0.00051459554,0.0001250982,0.00016683705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026430313,0.00017118856,0.00009505788,0.001576127,0.00053912983,0.0024502834,0.00012901172,0.00016661934,0.00011769157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060831364,0.000061576306,0.59738827,0.0000029089729,0.000029863517,0.0006221976,0.0016589172,0.000028537499,6.9861284e-7,0.39572436,0.0034620275,0.000959797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036467242,0.000020114232,0.055487864,0.000034704397,0.000010640001,0.0000025180098,0.011358871,0.000004772794,0.0000025615843,0.0007874355,0.9316927,0.00023312944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23766774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29454532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9282307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051953306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014201018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1600825248","doi":"10.19092/reed.v1i1.13","title":"Novos Horizontes Epistemológicos para a Pesquisa Empírica em Direito: \"Descentrar\" o Sujeito, \"Entrevistar\" o Sistema e Dessubstancializar as Categorias Jurídicas","year":2014,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.034618896274517266,"score_gpt":0.30596290252507674,"score_spread":0.2713440062505595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1600825248","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79516876,0.07573625,0.004735043,0.0069580493,0.008385999,0.0090509085,0.0006041366,0.0020017594,0.09735912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98056036,0.005830224,0.00015532193,0.0013040322,0.0064741047,0.00049103494,0.00011116364,0.00022742205,0.0048463424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832853,0.0031740644,0.0030444951,0.0029342023,0.0037229366,0.0038389983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910863,0.0018851422,0.0018173669,0.001785271,0.0012805897,0.0021453316],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037161962,0.0022489638,0.0035698526,0.0004821556,0.005139244,0.0023525665,0.0026842912,0.001048414,0.00083524414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004120301,0.002202834,0.0017319516,0.0034243218,0.0018367755,0.0008057136,0.000869231,0.0013470916,0.002737458],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00095049414,0.0042031608,0.06023299,0.002123083,0.0025605562,0.0012368262,0.0475816,0.000045136392,0.00059624657,0.7934762,0.051824227,0.035169438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037200071,0.0018039506,0.033391673,0.00395236,0.003464633,0.00018568663,0.029144093,0.0003613916,0.00031220095,0.0077769,0.91041934,0.0054677543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036295454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031654753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85859513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021543233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022761053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1600854381","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.987822","title":"Supreme Court Justices and Supreme Court Nominations: Do Nomination Battles Affect the Decisions of Sitting Justices?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Fraser Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Nomination; Voting; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Supreme Court Decisions; Politics; Majority opinion; Roberts Court; Concurring opinion; Court of record; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.023015022620416763,"score_gpt":0.3161520942857633,"score_spread":0.2931370716653465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1600854381","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9200368,0.015538952,0.033345222,0.0086364215,0.0007642167,0.00042920094,0.000012017873,0.000039076727,0.02119812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897726,0.009148709,0.0001750469,0.000054944765,0.000670546,0.0000042913457,0.0000016478215,0.0000073827364,0.00016480272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975388,0.00017640185,0.00039032145,0.00017739853,0.0005951169,0.0011219429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99700725,0.002073085,0.00033375566,0.00008956052,0.00040875655,0.000087572465],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007585625,0.00013242272,0.00019751277,0.00013689158,0.0023247965,0.000113275055,0.0003169856,0.000084669715,0.000041385523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023899786,0.00009833824,0.000092531256,0.00033583667,0.0007214195,0.00033805767,0.00006597455,0.0006389272,0.000008055077],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005352006,0.00007814407,0.010097507,0.0000061212654,0.00014451623,0.00000244912,0.0047998494,0.00003955364,0.00027981037,0.9183484,0.0001540256,0.06599613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015206378,0.00051176664,0.13089044,0.00035804696,0.00096212013,0.00016279926,0.33284518,0.0002536523,0.0002460905,0.51499814,0.016600478,0.00065067376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014100258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027140649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40335026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048313465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013156577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1601493943","doi":"","title":"Boundaries of Judicial Review: The Law of Justiciability in Canada, Second Edition","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Law; Political science; Judicial review","score_opus":0.017870824269250827,"score_gpt":0.2686591233230105,"score_spread":0.25078829905375966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1601493943","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42977148,0.053504072,0.000015538433,0.014074249,0.0042165313,0.0010269572,0.00031040132,0.000027615504,0.49705318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99680114,0.0005166473,0.000014527364,0.0019924003,0.0006083902,0.000018714523,0.0000040599343,0.0000025250254,0.000041605297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862343,0.000201748,0.0003435247,0.00010027662,0.00045980894,0.0002712319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992816,0.00021636224,0.00014203262,0.00012326888,0.00015837332,0.000078367666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010620994,0.00007781742,0.0002582941,0.000010514272,0.00064951554,0.000014202783,0.00017859576,0.00004156921,0.00059292046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005266713,0.00006022449,0.00005509456,0.00021962708,0.0020484077,0.00022033836,0.000050249804,0.0001424828,0.0000093694525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009448569,0.000039214636,0.021635355,0.000080520695,0.000014666494,4.271133e-7,0.00068268675,0.0000011230902,0.000016350408,0.9648657,0.012444685,0.00020983392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013238833,0.000015653994,0.07375881,0.0002775571,0.000051895488,3.791742e-7,0.0024757585,3.6154634e-7,0.00025037382,0.031444926,0.8914679,0.00012397034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98704565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9334208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002646374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014708504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75474435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1602421040","doi":"","title":"Canada's Unfathomable Unwritten Constitutional Principles","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitution; Judicial independence; Charter; Legitimacy; Separation of powers; Judicial review; Substantive due process; Independence (probability theory); Supreme court; Politics","score_opus":0.01147431975176556,"score_gpt":0.1861799023430638,"score_spread":0.17470558259129826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1602421040","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17436755,0.007045975,0.0005070232,0.007239482,0.0008685495,0.00027722138,0.00007226993,0.00016986488,0.80945206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96909106,0.0006977687,0.00022559566,0.0005754737,0.00037353343,0.000015267278,0.000021191565,0.0000057112024,0.02899438],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978395,0.00011673221,0.0002467205,0.00035559374,0.00090880925,0.000532614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894065,0.0001238322,0.00012472327,0.00016844076,0.00028883223,0.00035353532],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026578453,0.00019853376,0.00021751509,0.00009636715,0.017688725,0.00005197316,0.00035571333,0.00012496978,0.00014426408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014721877,0.00021763705,0.000119415454,0.00040466798,0.0021435602,0.00030448567,0.00017843887,0.00017862998,0.000047301557],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010252587,0.00006717594,0.07643881,0.0000037747047,0.00009982436,0.0014444344,0.002615987,0.00085651944,0.00022343219,0.913957,0.0034302778,0.00076023507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041502732,0.000015239728,0.03270785,0.000034514655,0.00005038926,0.0002818614,0.010876091,0.00007636028,0.00013850456,0.0021842623,0.95293266,0.00028725615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9755507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9597113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94950235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070280503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012723061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1603337498","doi":"10.21991/c9b952","title":"THE PREAMBLE, JUDICIAL INDEPENDANCE AND JUDICIAL INTEGRITY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Preamble; Political science; Law; Computer science; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.04632287987767642,"score_gpt":0.28452991552726187,"score_spread":0.23820703564958545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1603337498","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017773949,0.007265138,0.022709338,0.01689312,0.006677081,0.0014991544,0.00026276833,0.00050566613,0.9264138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958257,0.0013963969,0.0005517446,0.0011235784,0.00063739886,0.00013442141,0.00001670752,0.00000917194,0.0003048533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965015,0.00020956883,0.00064953667,0.00061388063,0.0008952434,0.0011302757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980656,0.0004308031,0.00024425518,0.00028726854,0.0005966658,0.00037543772],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011088039,0.00038001616,0.00038916225,0.00014405957,0.011747104,0.00019763409,0.00060550496,0.00031146416,0.00020849927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014879825,0.00030906982,0.00020583547,0.0005427661,0.032191403,0.00081934227,0.0003522993,0.00064929423,0.00019869467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014187538,0.00009582211,0.037154403,0.000003850033,0.00010575844,0.000020819765,0.0006367754,0.0000033078295,0.000014796794,0.95374733,0.003536387,0.004538866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000941663,0.00008177016,0.010741252,0.00012977528,0.000099473735,0.000095273994,0.008977034,0.000029351839,0.000090078574,0.54320586,0.43498334,0.0006251299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008886754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018804662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9780518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028974217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003134309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1603399318","doi":"10.21991/c9637h","title":"Conacher Missed the Mark on Constitutional Conventions and Fixed Election Dates","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Appeal; Statute; Convention; Political science; Constitution; Jurisprudence; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.0370479173186611,"score_gpt":0.29106634295021544,"score_spread":0.25401842563155436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1603399318","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023673473,0.010951429,0.047089312,0.10238552,0.010786971,0.0030538787,0.0008985454,0.0008430327,0.8003178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99228686,0.00047369266,0.00028812472,0.0046873395,0.00096579915,0.00024446612,0.00014445258,0.000010688357,0.0008985901],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99610853,0.00033143527,0.000653178,0.00057434547,0.0010079923,0.0013245324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975278,0.00088854914,0.00025474187,0.00032089217,0.00049774256,0.0005103235],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012301482,0.00047619568,0.0004236497,0.00024299235,0.009373801,0.0002252308,0.00040351824,0.0003073598,0.00074901973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013464754,0.00038741675,0.00027812773,0.00067255093,0.035869323,0.001090295,0.00018847827,0.00054279,0.00059997145],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009339224,0.00025361546,0.035063062,0.000007164202,0.00018776365,0.000005520955,0.00027288645,0.00005753114,0.0001221919,0.9447552,0.018323537,0.0008581658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013132313,0.00006746112,0.0060735587,0.00014611559,0.0001734733,0.0001850089,0.0060955947,0.000057282967,0.00018521582,0.05639707,0.9286094,0.00069659884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008450248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005400803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9686134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004504931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020110374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1603622049","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-27717-7_39","title":"Difference, Dissent, and Community Identity: Striking the Balance in Rights Theory and Jurisprudence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Political science; Optimal distinctiveness theory; Politics; Law; Democracy; Dissent; Human rights; Sociology; Law and economics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.028927346136588247,"score_gpt":0.2925722239494264,"score_spread":0.26364487781283813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1603622049","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0366939,0.0028011277,0.000069339876,0.00067100365,0.00013055911,0.0002711258,0.000008863464,0.000025584932,0.9593285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8774477,0.0034145864,0.000009566663,0.00015360552,0.00010890338,0.000010307414,0.0000015653799,0.0000037616994,0.11884997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989716,0.0002637073,0.0001581066,0.00015571021,0.00028024372,0.0001706364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987291,0.0009574019,0.000081819366,0.00012739941,0.000051622283,0.00005266271],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009328678,0.00014942492,0.00022032148,0.000041657768,0.0021075546,0.00015072114,0.0002788776,0.0001218392,0.00021085035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009891463,0.00009295199,0.00002944774,0.000037942595,0.002408524,0.00017474829,0.0002689984,0.00053441024,0.000013575642],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003774322,0.0000078065,0.0018228651,0.0000046849486,0.000017603716,0.0000015197985,0.0020471169,2.2490658e-8,0.000001081912,0.9945067,0.000081444094,0.001505367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053472682,0.000008676118,0.026939487,0.00013590073,0.000017586184,7.8968185e-7,0.0014511384,7.529687e-7,3.1037672e-7,0.9366966,0.03456153,0.00013378508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026505899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10853692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84075385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003783823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005019236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1604118981","doi":"10.1111/j.1469-8129.2008.00324.x","title":"Recognition or imposition? Federalism, national minorities, and the Supreme Court of Canada<sup>†</sup>","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nations and Nationalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Conestoga College","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; New Federalism; Law; Dialogical self; Cooperative federalism; Political science; Dual federalism; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03778319695283374,"score_gpt":0.2744087037273356,"score_spread":0.23662550677450186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1604118981","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6839665,0.002986491,0.000107315944,0.09399824,0.00034431808,0.00084644504,0.0011288637,0.000054810338,0.21656696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964456,0.0010802284,0.00017366566,0.00075755094,0.00026453478,0.000044197088,0.000067470886,0.0000028171962,0.0011639638],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987057,0.00009900277,0.00020500085,0.000120546254,0.00075245905,0.000117329175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813586,0.00079315057,0.000076963486,0.000028962275,0.00091477955,0.000050257713],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047419578,0.0000715028,0.000114853465,0.00009209535,0.00265341,0.000029889818,0.00006487143,0.000049766306,0.00013621489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006975467,0.000053334654,0.00002706905,0.0002781192,0.00097012287,0.00018057808,0.000023166494,0.000066670895,9.63814e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004335049,0.000029036471,0.0010194007,0.0000046059317,0.00004812615,0.0000015428351,0.0033662335,0.000029576631,0.0000024336834,0.98475295,0.010440858,0.00026187446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006106822,0.000074102616,0.08712784,0.00011582093,0.00013332226,0.00016409015,0.014753768,0.0017114506,0.000073171796,0.53212106,0.3569102,0.00070834707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30728048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31830812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45263192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012742112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015234756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1605254849","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1249","title":"Parliamentary Engagement with the Charter: Rethinking the Idea of Legislative Rights Review","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Charter; Political science; Legislation; Law; Bill of rights; Law and economics; Public administration; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.0621211467014886,"score_gpt":0.32157001392960227,"score_spread":0.25944886722811367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1605254849","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018894544,0.7628871,0.0000291871,0.06615808,0.00019204697,0.0013133676,0.000007992187,0.0000221301,0.16920115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49484092,0.48581332,0.000057035788,0.018589314,0.00040028518,0.00015226273,0.00000474052,0.000005610231,0.00013649491],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785894,0.0007733621,0.00028579426,0.00013238552,0.0006573637,0.00029214445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904567,0.00027439487,0.0002155507,0.00024547952,0.00016491434,0.00005398422],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003686808,0.00013296344,0.0003520955,0.000006027733,0.001474724,0.000015726031,0.0003694054,0.00002147525,0.000394211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000071110095,0.000057595156,0.00012821477,0.00023907772,0.0010962599,0.00022026265,0.000082962484,0.00019306301,0.000050848164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030483366,0.000035598125,0.0003323352,0.00066090777,0.0001460383,8.93704e-7,0.00490434,8.126374e-8,0.0000012416527,0.95813173,0.032348167,0.003435637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045600595,0.000017899758,0.00021537591,0.009022121,0.00031022052,0.0000012404919,0.0003496555,6.598924e-8,0.000004904795,0.0045244372,0.98541504,0.000093409246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076082256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006850766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95360726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054530832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000082226776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1605711693","doi":"10.21991/c9bq1p","title":"Canada's Re-emerging Division of Powers and the Unrealized Force of Reciprocal Interjurisdictional Immunity","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Political science; Supreme court; Reciprocal; Separation of powers; Government (linguistics); Law; Law and economics; Qualified immunity; Public administration; Sociology; Constitution","score_opus":0.0235577028077574,"score_gpt":0.2628474321849137,"score_spread":0.23928972937715628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1605711693","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08116443,0.006367398,0.07211532,0.017345719,0.0044331676,0.0020227155,0.0010631192,0.00015972005,0.8153284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986259,0.00036630206,0.0003379113,0.00042311582,0.00006224854,0.000040857005,0.000027857892,0.0000049431574,0.00011087341],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973697,0.00023449321,0.0007716318,0.00030519447,0.0008306988,0.0004882817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801195,0.0005491766,0.00039881718,0.00022569712,0.0006535806,0.00016077858],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010213808,0.00023988953,0.000483736,0.00014293769,0.0023830233,0.000020218518,0.00041500828,0.00013327136,0.00022503681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010853531,0.00018752491,0.00020329925,0.00044078488,0.025163827,0.00034962955,0.00028016706,0.00025822135,0.0000035271544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004102488,0.0000730748,0.020485263,0.000012803236,0.00016216135,0.0000039122224,0.0010712194,0.000048405043,0.000045426168,0.9760245,0.0010215811,0.00064142194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011440903,0.00027005008,0.030588916,0.001224372,0.000481457,0.00010661894,0.079568155,0.00046386287,0.001656803,0.68567365,0.18707557,0.0014496406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5264232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3451331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91746145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023249623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049795555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99891573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1606111470","doi":"10.21991/c9395w","title":"CANADIAN CONSTITUTIONALISM AND SOVEREIGNTY AFTER NAFTA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Sovereignty; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.027503341842709927,"score_gpt":0.24695094003863108,"score_spread":0.21944759819592116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1606111470","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00870481,0.0042845295,0.0076164594,0.009592852,0.0028170638,0.000961354,0.0008395849,0.00033004396,0.9648533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935999,0.0005862461,0.0010188777,0.0036017266,0.00034600872,0.00020892968,0.00006623251,0.000011805344,0.00056026253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963281,0.00014342202,0.000613436,0.0007545967,0.0007608147,0.0013995938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99769527,0.00015293522,0.00015156518,0.00030301412,0.0006128382,0.001084358],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005858397,0.0004670417,0.0004436593,0.00044681164,0.0052547413,0.00015963575,0.0004208074,0.0003860114,0.0038648713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005719051,0.00048213577,0.00022708894,0.00055971125,0.022775302,0.0011114349,0.00020749215,0.00037624303,0.0005115661],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007378714,0.00007736257,0.060591415,0.00000664043,0.00011635115,0.00013253199,0.0006258324,0.00000597398,0.0000047035223,0.93515,0.002502034,0.00071335625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010286159,0.00004838931,0.008576932,0.000160745,0.00012250576,0.00025997052,0.006929197,0.000018921333,0.000034637716,0.41549096,0.5663682,0.00096091087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18614033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28258458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9848951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067524967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008160675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1606378390","doi":"10.7202/1020661ar","title":"Jimena Andino Dorato, Jean-Frédérick Ménard et Lionel Smith (dir.), Le droit civil et ses codes : parcours à travers les Amériques, Montréal, Éditions Thémis, 2011, 212 p., ISBN 978-2-8940029-1-9.","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Humanities; Cartography; Geography","score_opus":0.011977558326932534,"score_gpt":0.23569867991011337,"score_spread":0.22372112158318083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1606378390","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20783545,0.2792013,0.025999337,0.19581744,0.002347281,0.002774002,0.0029619513,0.0011337731,0.28192946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81608576,0.10061637,0.0011341372,0.0029136054,0.0007262237,0.00029360183,0.00017530599,0.00007982915,0.077975154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953181,0.0007585746,0.00072181755,0.00084139436,0.0009529271,0.0014071445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997294,0.00083055295,0.00040460672,0.0003991319,0.00042626212,0.0006454174],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010357295,0.00068337447,0.0008458922,0.00024240711,0.0033749414,0.00047515696,0.00067200826,0.0007407244,0.0020978695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029462823,0.00073730084,0.000493831,0.000724938,0.0058360044,0.0013030982,0.00015871614,0.0011245225,0.000848826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045304616,0.0005297365,0.0025224932,0.00007837461,0.0005160858,0.00006868615,0.006531626,0.00046539633,0.00014767615,0.6051223,0.3746506,0.0093216635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014435305,0.00026838318,0.013627246,0.00053685607,0.00041620948,0.00005713304,0.051942863,0.0003757212,0.00030590076,0.3075775,0.62166846,0.0017801902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25108206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08262187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6082503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012153453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010902558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1607777141","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139167109.003","title":"The Rule of Law as the Rule of Liberal Principle","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rule of law; Law; Due process; Political science; Public law; Ideal (ethics); Law and economics; Private law; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03987001941949147,"score_gpt":0.2607157570756059,"score_spread":0.22084573765611443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1607777141","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00088412204,0.000511218,0.000009925455,0.00019254386,0.00023745978,0.0002956107,0.00010180887,0.000025509571,0.9977418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024866937,0.00034984568,0.000011938736,0.00012353605,0.00019467993,5.180656e-7,0.0000038998573,0.000008178385,0.97444046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889636,0.000048372873,0.00017994153,0.0001730246,0.00047895577,0.00022335158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989009,0.0002631028,0.00025833046,0.00023418783,0.00027921045,0.00006427844],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033651554,0.00014719278,0.00024304898,0.00003264861,0.001357811,0.000018581126,0.0006268806,0.00016929679,0.000006923215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027629376,0.00010825269,0.00020570043,0.000012546327,0.0038933153,0.000045666377,0.0003408985,0.00023223646,0.000008372241],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005675187,0.000006969742,0.000007350533,0.0000081510825,0.00012285248,0.000012197827,0.000887697,6.671104e-7,0.000006061291,0.99701613,0.0012740263,0.000601166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012859797,0.000019983503,0.000084489926,0.000057197307,0.000099200115,8.191444e-7,0.00033620762,4.2632104e-7,0.00014502893,0.0016313129,0.9973767,0.00012005914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013609197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005306916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99610263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009912521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028286263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W161486715","doi":"10.21991/c9cq2c","title":"CONSTITUTIONAL LIMBO IN TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO (THE UNCERTAINTY, NOT THE DANCE)*","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Variety (cybernetics); Dance; Style (visual arts); Politics; Constitutional crisis; Law; Political science; History; Art; Archaeology; Computer science; Literature","score_opus":0.05186781107398396,"score_gpt":0.28046183798764945,"score_spread":0.22859402691366548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W161486715","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028617486,0.006283088,0.01567537,0.10185182,0.00546704,0.0030472828,0.0005059276,0.00040297082,0.838149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99196476,0.00077420153,0.00025459568,0.0060526957,0.0003906777,0.00029405963,0.000029394016,0.000006541649,0.00023306011],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959972,0.00032643,0.000821073,0.0006963582,0.0010041526,0.0011548008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977495,0.00081918534,0.0002511108,0.00040330313,0.00043751238,0.0003393781],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015353023,0.0004496795,0.00046543762,0.00016708054,0.0067558996,0.00018003817,0.00084638305,0.00026432474,0.00041385577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017562687,0.00031135284,0.0002497316,0.00090725586,0.06421056,0.0007497718,0.00040123393,0.00064504053,0.00022221795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014628386,0.00014243915,0.037629433,0.000005407328,0.00009402472,0.00003557446,0.0011059922,0.00018112556,0.000016070435,0.9564286,0.0021595357,0.0020555344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020290199,0.00008205398,0.0139445495,0.00021857195,0.00012739578,0.00024452666,0.01959824,0.00015243757,0.00006645211,0.25767633,0.7050036,0.00085679087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006785394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014516109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9633473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004159367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036134156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1615853112","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2473557","title":"Legal Principles Governing the Disqualification of Judges","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02067695888745726,"score_gpt":0.28108570515663084,"score_spread":0.2604087462691736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1615853112","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6335819,0.005303069,0.014878443,0.023974096,0.00047331248,0.00019185353,0.0000032499977,0.000045731835,0.32154837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99658006,0.0019991328,0.000012830107,0.00006602785,0.0005251981,0.0000022963172,5.417942e-7,0.00000256806,0.0008113562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986522,0.00017923527,0.00015550958,0.00006524548,0.00032959247,0.00061821786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999552,0.00012481905,0.00015285982,0.000056132078,0.0000889773,0.000025205423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027985873,0.00004766334,0.00008066914,0.000017287364,0.0010181945,0.00003244048,0.00021863788,0.000025177927,0.000015438278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004608628,0.000031090192,0.00005852624,0.0001125457,0.0003375115,0.00011027544,0.000022275475,0.00037924034,0.00001556225],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060491047,0.000011228975,0.0061302106,5.282154e-7,0.000028666422,4.419167e-8,0.00075307797,0.000018859755,0.000043472737,0.9839882,0.000034319713,0.008985346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016169688,0.00007786477,0.010822722,0.0000134738675,0.00003359722,0.000013410066,0.020412771,0.000024679179,0.00003436642,0.59227544,0.37603235,0.00009758625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023402078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015624067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39171273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026716848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010945378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8718596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1616620563","doi":"","title":"Principled Expediency: How the Irish Courts Can Compromise on Same-Sex Marriage","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Politics; Supreme court; Appeal; Law; Political science; Adjudication; Irish; Constitutional court; Legislature; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; Constitution; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028588200291334475,"score_gpt":0.286308973757233,"score_spread":0.25772077346589856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1616620563","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77804,0.011538076,0.0004682101,0.07890216,0.0022692839,0.0005986845,0.000007783534,0.000106427746,0.12806939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98906404,0.004119347,0.000009936005,0.000583176,0.0026976985,0.000014811821,9.169073e-7,0.0000084170315,0.0035016865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99661386,0.0002479559,0.00015287721,0.00013106612,0.0006114507,0.0022427647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993815,0.00013134295,0.00013717782,0.0001088541,0.00007936567,0.00016176677],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026182695,0.0001370699,0.00016489379,0.00004028071,0.0024470272,0.00010098313,0.00036822332,0.00006406551,0.00006036577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024185723,0.00009070978,0.00011296243,0.00015679773,0.00045152835,0.00017383666,0.00004937321,0.001028455,0.00003586602],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035047564,0.00011151143,0.010884255,9.015066e-7,0.00012480405,0.0000026270627,0.0072112205,0.000004822079,0.0000323156,0.9694688,0.0034439296,0.008679782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010276265,0.00032746853,0.011980348,0.000040535062,0.000108792905,0.0000873899,0.07993222,0.000009249493,0.000059551796,0.42843983,0.47745508,0.00053189584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015998136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00977655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.541029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018339109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99885166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W16205292","doi":"10.1097/01.olq.0000180565.54023.bf","title":"Legislative Scrutiny and the Charter of Rights: A Review of Senate Practices and Procedures","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Charter; Legislature; Parliament; Legislation; Political science; Law; Public administration; Situated; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.062418534794266844,"score_gpt":0.37229742874776744,"score_spread":0.3098788939535006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W16205292","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[4.7320466e-7,0.9631258,7.621164e-8,0.008791552,0.00007118043,0.0024628572,0.0001547549,0.0000046493647,0.025388608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000026364403,0.995368,0.000019355602,0.0040972806,0.00018336932,0.00017560292,0.000018662362,0.000007680076,0.000103660175],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768865,0.0006970131,0.0007608808,0.0002875499,0.00029845003,0.00026744144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977353,0.00033442373,0.0013945411,0.00017740467,0.00015111647,0.00020718065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015367316,0.0002666465,0.0019347818,0.00007052391,0.00041320926,0.000019644993,0.00026434413,0.000078795856,0.00021193558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006801523,0.00015442724,0.00024771443,0.00036190063,0.0019973211,0.00016929806,0.000051993284,0.00019695173,0.000009222585],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002550799,0.000011774892,0.000009361193,0.19125754,0.0004264559,0.000005192587,0.00059299043,1.0059047e-9,3.815447e-9,0.02587444,0.018496346,0.76332337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005916315,0.0000076000183,0.000001545598,0.30695912,0.0013695911,0.000010009013,0.00008389019,1.4854875e-8,1.0766782e-8,0.0002590753,0.69113654,0.00011344666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3324405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4724205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7632099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012751642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020777723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73592126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W162727026","doi":"","title":"Proportionnalité et droits fondamentaux : recherches comparées sur le travail du juge américain au regard des expériences canadienne, sud-africaine et de la Cour européenne des droits de l'homme","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"theses.fr (ABES)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Legitimacy; Jurisprudence; Doctrine; Constitutional theory; Proportionality (law); Constitutional law; Politics","score_opus":0.07137677875976556,"score_gpt":0.33062838770954056,"score_spread":0.259251608949775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W162727026","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7953609,0.0030563052,0.0002130093,0.0019529613,0.0004751612,0.0005366103,0.00011855617,0.0001500881,0.1981364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921347,0.003422869,0.00080444594,0.00038875098,0.0006656025,0.00024754644,0.00016905322,0.000075919765,0.0020911095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915546,0.0038370728,0.00096099003,0.00081586157,0.000868475,0.0019629917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951412,0.002307137,0.000724142,0.00031385868,0.0007029315,0.00081073],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008302749,0.00080834917,0.001048141,0.00021002298,0.002807472,0.00029189372,0.0009646924,0.0005676704,0.00019779004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031324914,0.0007724101,0.00036571868,0.001165669,0.005099241,0.0009061041,0.00014286897,0.00084391545,0.00008052263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000099094956,0.0006766972,0.08258496,0.00013716058,0.00025004213,0.00004792877,0.26948088,0.00004585061,0.0006163035,0.6420894,0.00014583807,0.0038258343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009474365,0.00026525697,0.46100125,0.0010577543,0.0004768964,0.0000831642,0.27222845,0.000054117234,0.0010282042,0.20568387,0.05580071,0.0013728734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8049436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7722642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43640554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024718095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055428245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1652167591","doi":"10.21991/c9ft08","title":"BEADS AND TRINKETS TAKE ON NEW FORM IN FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL PROPOSALS FOR ABORIGINAL PEOPLES IN CANADA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.03219861674361356,"score_gpt":0.2795373486055785,"score_spread":0.24733873186196492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1652167591","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2545582,0.0046978355,0.041538768,0.030771432,0.008538628,0.0079619875,0.0022010126,0.00039614586,0.649336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99577576,0.0003692013,0.001581358,0.001377399,0.00028703248,0.00030072013,0.00008091373,0.000009931467,0.0002176824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959751,0.00010803574,0.00091730396,0.000799794,0.00085709867,0.0013426663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820286,0.00058169046,0.00021199977,0.00020163208,0.0003204625,0.00048136275],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006306388,0.00049353705,0.0006438156,0.00043783046,0.002200085,0.00010070708,0.0004026382,0.00024606634,0.00022228679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000837182,0.00049805344,0.00016498432,0.00064626284,0.009576722,0.00078338844,0.00009397686,0.00040005625,0.0000302669],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032434452,0.00014630634,0.21957818,0.00001457732,0.000043935266,0.00005484133,0.00046841538,0.00007813257,0.000011608378,0.7760543,0.0020034725,0.001221869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014597125,0.0004815872,0.10023275,0.0016467329,0.000119919554,0.0002996602,0.03028057,0.00030386084,0.00037462675,0.5055644,0.34299025,0.003108541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7304971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9690748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74121755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002644293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041880246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1653276541","doi":"10.24908/fg.v8i2.4374","title":"CONSOLIDATED DEMOCRACIES AND THE PAST: TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE IN SPAIN AND CANADA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Governance","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transitional justice; Political science; Political economy; Politics; Democracy; Consolidation (business); Sociology; Development economics; Law","score_opus":0.018523410733648975,"score_gpt":0.22593136911736333,"score_spread":0.20740795838371437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1653276541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8658585,0.002288919,0.00004721928,0.022991193,0.000262038,0.00018723993,0.000052428484,0.00001441184,0.10829808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977904,0.0006612799,0.00004008108,0.0011568308,0.00009142606,0.0000081189655,5.6216675e-7,0.000001347401,0.00024993654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994393,0.0000740948,0.00008208041,0.00009430386,0.00017195352,0.0001382597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997528,0.00012806468,0.000034585264,0.000023424398,0.000028266828,0.00003285654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018635106,0.000052245046,0.00008818672,0.0000037486072,0.00066560524,0.00002371984,0.000053683467,0.000020166433,0.000032961576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009757973,0.000038184946,0.000009169964,0.00005411143,0.0008136187,0.00007779265,0.000019089164,0.000063578,9.959222e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010875753,0.000010806221,0.03852345,0.00000541093,0.000011963322,0.000017964901,0.0052309753,0.0000011121275,0.0000026894716,0.9534878,0.0018412025,0.0007578765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009907391,0.000009602015,0.9192613,0.000040647006,0.00002316834,0.000006833343,0.005980702,0.000025030029,0.0000062117842,0.033002872,0.04049039,0.0001625268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91776836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9763928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9204849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004390182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021859504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5119365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1657864637","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2818","title":"The Responsibility of Judges in Interpreting Tax Legislation: Japan’s Experience","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Statutory interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Statutory law; Jurisprudence; Normative; Political science; Law; Supreme court; Meaning (existential); Law and economics; Economics; Linguistics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.054345914101540445,"score_gpt":0.3392434112677006,"score_spread":0.28489749716616014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1657864637","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16593188,0.0013008916,0.00009916563,0.0052750106,0.0005007239,0.00008434586,0.0000017449878,0.000010790847,0.82679546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993094,0.00010828572,0.00015615374,0.000090563255,0.0002048856,0.0000047466565,1.2582251e-7,0.0000020321709,0.00012380439],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861926,0.0003437094,0.00029180266,0.000096817144,0.00044146477,0.00020692698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991332,0.00029783798,0.00014767118,0.00008383903,0.00024781213,0.00008962861],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024434926,0.000058512705,0.00011453863,0.000022095439,0.0010830854,0.00007998984,0.00025675827,0.00003952264,0.000026548625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014840176,0.000040871008,0.000049265553,0.00015864956,0.0010763771,0.00025455843,0.00006494777,0.00018189134,0.0000060523867],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007642415,0.000024408931,0.045905888,5.1167353e-7,0.0000073112114,0.0000040944283,0.021771433,0.000024155395,0.000029638974,0.929625,0.00022466682,0.0023065202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048936816,0.00009562313,0.01576814,0.00012525734,0.000009815374,0.000026933967,0.112707004,0.000040554198,0.00014340496,0.8020759,0.06833235,0.0001855977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.072894625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47649837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83337754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015217732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026673975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93327904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W165821138","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1164","title":"Appealing Outcomes: A Study for the Overturn Rate of Canada's Appellate Courts","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02785301591765098,"score_gpt":0.30009520614751717,"score_spread":0.2722421902298662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W165821138","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03714995,0.0030323032,0.0028323384,0.05993674,0.002424116,0.0015649754,0.000048271962,0.000045694564,0.8929656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980916,0.0000988105,0.000044020322,0.0011359504,0.00033315693,0.000003837692,2.7972396e-7,0.0000035222738,0.0002888712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878496,0.00011085106,0.00027750412,0.00010141401,0.00041006823,0.00031519638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991315,0.0002986056,0.00018486359,0.00007783261,0.00020926922,0.000097913144],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012304169,0.00009821403,0.00021500347,0.000015506363,0.002676189,0.000069399764,0.00026378938,0.000029540719,0.000023904091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017562268,0.00006169954,0.000102468475,0.000079404446,0.00017291783,0.00007733278,0.000019460262,0.00014890492,0.0000010007496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044160795,0.00010536238,0.0036555973,0.0000015660762,0.00016076113,0.000011804713,0.0018707095,0.00029505073,0.000013677066,0.99015415,0.001480305,0.0022068874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024743404,0.00045466117,0.07085449,0.00012084956,0.0003386262,0.000021864038,0.034160968,0.0001304854,0.000062387226,0.75544935,0.13542198,0.00050998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8745984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9877391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9609416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011364484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055326073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1666473040","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1179","title":"Judicial Accountability, Michel Bastarache and the Charter’s Fundamental Freedoms","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Charter; Jurisprudence; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.037496424893044666,"score_gpt":0.32508904893399215,"score_spread":0.2875926240409475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1666473040","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009089527,0.42466593,0.000041520572,0.23397675,0.00078679394,0.0021834096,0.0000478251,0.0001348581,0.32907337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92324287,0.05396538,0.000029692605,0.02204933,0.0005827217,0.000031028125,0.0000046529044,0.0000037041505,0.00009064037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984939,0.00024732953,0.00027923245,0.00023006862,0.00045958135,0.00028989097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942774,0.00013750671,0.00008099388,0.00015895213,0.00011080993,0.000083999206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015734668,0.00013950162,0.00036565185,0.00000997714,0.00119079,0.00007788491,0.00026333466,0.000048025602,0.00034184157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015812487,0.00009148769,0.00013435552,0.00016431022,0.0023096094,0.00019631394,0.00006968123,0.00014738152,0.000084851425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024574145,0.000047562255,0.00046025484,0.000046562887,0.000028352115,0.0000014907615,0.000916255,4.4313815e-8,0.000008523402,0.97939664,0.008975609,0.0100941155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046321144,0.00003199268,0.0022205934,0.00048705027,0.00012344701,0.000003541976,0.00048821993,0.0000016782157,0.0000019983124,0.062587194,0.9334255,0.00016557184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010575494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008141029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92444986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000067701905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010321195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99601316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1683052951","doi":"10.14288/bcs.v0i82.185888","title":"Progression of Judges: A History of the Supreme Court of British Columbia by David R. Verchere","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Collections","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.030368635870000008,"score_gpt":0.2825239563727059,"score_spread":0.2521553205027059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1683052951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014324141,0.00065593957,0.000022827078,0.0004959466,0.0004345478,0.00049552723,0.000104190585,0.000009204124,0.9834577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7862689,0.00010737322,0.000096244694,0.000040478564,0.00003798639,0.000048198483,0.0000017984751,0.0000032343216,0.21339579],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992335,0.00015373585,0.0001706676,0.00009455755,0.00025805083,0.000089531226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941504,0.00009360005,0.00014030076,0.00009343796,0.00023098353,0.000026621785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003660683,0.000030576964,0.00015162893,0.0000069599514,0.0009870745,0.000050857194,0.0003045194,0.00004598877,0.0005200011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026756493,0.000035714023,0.000057252244,0.0003775558,0.00093325734,0.00007622505,0.000118773125,0.00005599823,6.321732e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006461085,0.00014019519,0.006017993,0.000006242565,0.000022723836,5.5670835e-8,0.00078162336,0.0000010756138,0.00016754436,0.00057125126,0.9910198,0.0012650517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002893623,0.0000869493,0.005826577,0.0001363445,0.000036638317,8.567678e-7,0.0017982718,0.0000067119395,0.00004505,0.004114289,0.9875896,0.00006933534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71491486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.662156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77194476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001778897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006589731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7591879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W168547891","doi":"","title":"Conclusion — The Migration of Legal Ideas: Legislative Design and the Lawmaking Process","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Formality; Lawmaking; Legislature; Legal pluralism; Political science; Comparative law; Bureaucracy; Pluralism (philosophy); Law; Preference; Legal realism; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.011599824166220626,"score_gpt":0.28156829855442084,"score_spread":0.2699684743882002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W168547891","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50353146,0.024021886,0.27618298,0.09424001,0.00055880717,0.001239243,0.0000014849377,0.000050440045,0.10017371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971463,0.0021973706,0.000017540888,0.0001670219,0.00031409893,0.000005402736,1.07683135e-7,0.0000021530682,0.00014998739],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857247,0.00047219836,0.00013636315,0.00006645026,0.00029642734,0.00045607856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992876,0.00036114993,0.00015210306,0.00003414717,0.00014734748,0.000017659471],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044792006,0.00005516577,0.0001002106,0.000016331935,0.0018426147,0.000048473175,0.0001545415,0.000025679312,0.0000029716523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035226427,0.000027398915,0.00004007623,0.00012410656,0.00095181,0.00015661152,0.000023488274,0.0003873581,0.0000010175796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006240735,0.000005285157,0.00028262634,5.650438e-7,0.000034734916,7.7189696e-8,0.007052922,0.000057270438,0.000017228384,0.9871713,0.000019629615,0.0052959677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040092113,0.00006705228,0.00027735013,0.000019220448,0.000033865956,0.000013413044,0.015993355,0.0002910733,0.000024188726,0.9748918,0.007939429,0.00004832631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041962345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021231493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49361488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010394716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001045449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1687411712","doi":"10.12957/publicum.2016.27018","title":"How Unwritten Constitutional Norms Change Written Constitutions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Political science; Law; Constitutional amendment; Original meaning; Constitutional economics; Constitutional law; Legislature; Constitutional interpretation; Norm (philosophy); Originalism; Constitution; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.06252922353307204,"score_gpt":0.2800950830805794,"score_spread":0.21756585954750735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1687411712","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005635562,0.0016685772,0.006915379,0.18809773,0.0026468562,0.0010450558,0.00022061574,0.00078442437,0.7929858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932509,0.00030102642,0.0015014234,0.0008627529,0.0026793086,0.00042541645,0.0001287541,0.000020133464,0.0008302543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958086,0.00046627095,0.0005133837,0.0006983986,0.0014965812,0.0010167817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968692,0.00023922493,0.00028332486,0.00036689595,0.0012080425,0.0010332925],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001167716,0.00043388273,0.00049984513,0.000379235,0.0027873635,0.00047281556,0.0007036877,0.00049782934,0.00004948649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017452185,0.0004170343,0.00025844673,0.001018673,0.0008185274,0.0012753515,0.0002634676,0.00057322136,0.0000682692],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007684567,0.00029557868,0.002141814,0.000013459614,0.00012524826,0.00014304105,0.0030984376,0.000014800626,0.00007493097,0.989835,0.00316663,0.0010141904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010172891,0.000047322414,0.0020610574,0.000083132225,0.000074490854,0.0003373827,0.004592376,0.000031216703,0.00004091144,0.01033799,0.9808469,0.00052992284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000070320944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019816349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98761535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013121313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032346677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1710424065","doi":"10.1080/08263663.2014.883827","title":"Le contrôle législatif de la bureaucratie sous les régimes présidentiels: Le cas de l’Argentine à la lumière des théories américaines","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies / Revue canadienne des études latino-américaines et caraïbes","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.028444351488665424,"score_gpt":0.2754304417094041,"score_spread":0.2469860902207387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1710424065","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89046854,0.053638995,0.00018584244,0.015341523,0.0006181519,0.00041178305,0.00018313121,0.00004341377,0.039108615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9760548,0.017204328,0.0026869406,0.00061189395,0.0009905577,0.00006484329,0.0000104318515,0.00007298355,0.0023032455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99472964,0.0014019494,0.0011753397,0.00055307755,0.0003094133,0.0018305747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929884,0.0023218922,0.0010114359,0.00026871022,0.0016855494,0.0017240202],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017150078,0.000736466,0.0015801096,0.00045366972,0.0031314176,0.0005427847,0.00059008057,0.00027041783,0.000051073657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035584425,0.00072785077,0.00045075393,0.0013254306,0.01811316,0.00077366736,0.00015384772,0.00074940635,0.0000058893424],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000329223,0.00013988788,0.37675467,0.00035486647,0.002037648,0.0008939921,0.12380979,0.00044530828,0.00012274124,0.45150232,0.005921056,0.037984792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012405074,0.00071391294,0.3316345,0.0013505196,0.00080377585,0.001214958,0.4297852,0.00016177517,0.00004182476,0.07712788,0.15446296,0.0014622088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8068108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91892374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37437442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013203933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004905217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99951726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1712134171","doi":"","title":"Lesbians, Gay Men and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Subjectivity; Charter; Heteronormativity; Heterosexuality; Gender studies; Political science; Doctrine; Homosexuality; Law; Political subjectivity; Politics; Sociology; Gay rights; Human sexuality; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0329889584142464,"score_gpt":0.3009609721328364,"score_spread":0.26797201371859003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1712134171","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.112156935,0.0050931047,0.000016325866,0.018666942,0.000060555634,0.0001153797,0.0000015565004,0.000013038649,0.86387616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949528,0.000562063,0.00001438101,0.000085999265,0.00009473531,0.0000029843627,6.238316e-8,7.421567e-7,0.0042862603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996797,0.000038938728,0.000042596963,0.00005696531,0.00010601129,0.00007580926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998321,0.00007151394,0.000020713382,0.00003267097,0.000019727697,0.000023277515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014424547,0.000031408214,0.00007320211,0.000007685696,0.00037430483,0.000012231166,0.00004076098,0.000018019631,0.00012735136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023570732,0.000018319386,0.000012717171,0.000045985846,0.0014649997,0.000031062613,0.000020319483,0.000026987258,0.000009234476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012329243,0.00001466098,0.001375985,0.0000022436593,0.000028294613,0.0000011146302,0.101793334,1.4053771e-7,0.000042634947,0.882546,0.012405846,0.0017774096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002530766,0.00007133054,0.019710729,0.00006530238,0.00009806441,0.0000041422245,0.055300947,0.00013347602,0.0001849318,0.27901226,0.64257205,0.0003159829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016862594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018273327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8827958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004386769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000046790888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9896842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1722913305","doi":"10.29173/alr281","title":"The Difficulty of Constitutional Amendment in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Constitutionalism; Constitutional amendment; Statute; Law; Political science; Politics; Constitutional law; Limited government; Amendment; Originalism; Supreme court; Democracy","score_opus":0.04481480875661499,"score_gpt":0.29956805553630916,"score_spread":0.2547532467796942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1722913305","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004798463,0.13485247,0.0000033569388,0.030600429,0.00051005505,0.00044137533,0.000009073329,0.000003907537,0.8287809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97780335,0.02060552,0.0000042891597,0.0013647354,0.000037298872,0.000022829849,0.0000020164719,6.990368e-7,0.00015926815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992054,0.000086947,0.00019173094,0.000068859066,0.0003135761,0.00013349116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947625,0.00025906033,0.000056788198,0.000060937844,0.00008747194,0.00005947721],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003330712,0.000045786164,0.00014220476,0.0000028533675,0.00024307276,0.0000054487004,0.00013088246,0.000009909097,0.000030136061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003438644,0.000028395183,0.000027661214,0.00013055267,0.00095309503,0.0000347164,0.000028446395,0.00003880964,0.000013171036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012819753,0.000008050487,0.0019994623,0.0000120713885,0.000007634866,8.93626e-7,0.00007631946,0.0000017131001,2.071227e-7,0.9911989,0.0059494576,0.0007440298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000634323,0.0000033063347,0.00044405035,0.00031288413,0.0000097567,5.077789e-7,0.00027356247,2.8668975e-7,0.0000015809228,0.0035153239,0.9953327,0.000042570042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9964718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9893833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002973503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00235556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4178662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1734584319","doi":"10.24124/c677/2013381","title":"Meaningful Participation? The Judicialization of Electoral Reform in Canada Post-Figueroa v. Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Political Science Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Legislature; Electoral reform; Supreme court; Citizen journalism; Public administration; Political science; Democratic system; State (computer science); Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.02309300363091316,"score_gpt":0.2956653401613637,"score_spread":0.27257233653045054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1734584319","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2394983,0.01308837,0.0000054420807,0.4453334,0.0009597039,0.0019818135,0.000104300576,0.000016648943,0.29901204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98754716,0.00040529692,0.0000040558753,0.011913414,0.00005995461,0.000038732334,0.0000025184768,0.0000021414235,0.000026717284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976094,0.00009522361,0.000310053,0.00015711888,0.00069187616,0.0011363478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836856,0.00008363889,0.00006021328,0.000121448866,0.00048873597,0.00087739783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075163884,0.000077404766,0.00019008589,0.000045958594,0.00066656887,0.000027432276,0.0004039939,0.000018604449,0.00037005072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020952695,0.000054938544,0.00002283068,0.0011764729,0.0009437586,0.00018219688,0.00002501975,0.00008470114,0.00000970749],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.9635712e-7,0.0000030394044,0.017050823,0.000022222484,0.0000024629237,0.0000023867194,0.00007623013,0.0000012347655,0.0000025500356,0.9784222,0.0019918906,0.002424757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082075734,0.000021945221,0.87029123,0.0008136615,0.000035153087,0.0000019157385,0.003370471,0.000049157647,0.00003564161,0.018625883,0.10633755,0.00033531754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99999964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9597963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01127095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.086831525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9925246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1735496562","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1030","title":"Does Canada Need a Political Questions Doctrine?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Doctrine; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.034377514726984915,"score_gpt":0.29878037540790536,"score_spread":0.26440286068092045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1735496562","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021268553,0.08023977,0.000012199422,0.20040448,0.00074843084,0.0004162492,0.00004153357,0.00008658384,0.71783805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9389897,0.04510506,0.000044409448,0.01331144,0.0005829117,0.000047050227,0.0000035270325,0.0000050527638,0.0019108494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867445,0.00012391336,0.00021334701,0.00015742026,0.00043151347,0.00039936294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937665,0.0001035523,0.000035276087,0.00012118275,0.00016096309,0.0002023519],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023340371,0.000098518736,0.0002380049,0.000009624693,0.0007776554,0.000025466243,0.00017856549,0.000031721935,0.0016757576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003420199,0.0000631269,0.00007566205,0.00021027667,0.00046920203,0.00008947406,0.000036770125,0.0000991403,0.00012415048],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.1327968e-7,0.00001656705,0.0003089357,0.000049626255,0.000013646301,0.000007376687,0.0000309508,6.351778e-8,5.380977e-7,0.96301293,0.035762064,0.0007969794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042920405,0.000004719938,0.00018463805,0.0004875245,0.00004639204,0.000001394593,0.000090781985,0.0000010308715,0.000001152443,0.011322013,0.9877045,0.000112904265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9183815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95607454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95194244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022405162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003398418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1737373107","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1297","title":"Canada (Attorney General) v. Bedford and the Limits on Substantive Criminal Law under Section 7","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Arbitrariness; Supreme court; Charter; Proportionality (law); Parliament; Political science; Legislature; Criminal law; Section (typography); Constitutional law; Criminal justice; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.046386013255595424,"score_gpt":0.2924796537766195,"score_spread":0.24609364052102406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1737373107","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015644846,0.081596285,0.00010996264,0.07058719,0.0015366911,0.0010681702,0.00002775542,0.000061862724,0.8293672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9464607,0.02905304,0.000012021013,0.02358844,0.0006042635,0.000028640561,0.0000035382598,0.0000050106178,0.00024429607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868566,0.00032431146,0.00017424962,0.00018672863,0.0004108847,0.00021819312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937296,0.00022368095,0.00006957993,0.00010995757,0.00014859514,0.000075220356],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079380587,0.00011481092,0.00025572992,0.0000061313244,0.0013022983,0.00003855746,0.00013281367,0.000035546953,0.000054755354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012357868,0.00007434446,0.00006023794,0.00011507947,0.0009500224,0.00007987726,0.00002633938,0.0001184266,0.000011271444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011879833,0.0000069432417,0.00004544977,0.00004903181,0.000023408,7.386117e-7,0.00012530341,0.0000017539624,0.0000016064384,0.99329597,0.0054589785,0.0009789321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001849371,0.000020063213,0.00052200217,0.0004088998,0.00010637967,0.0000014943969,0.00014832009,0.000003181754,0.000010330336,0.015182614,0.9832983,0.00011344989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86647916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97313446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97811335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012535989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002640907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1750103857","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9930.2010.00325.x","title":"A Refugee from Justice? Disparate Treatment in the Federal Court of Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Immigration; Refugee; Demographics; Political science; Economic Justice; Law; Representation (politics); Ideology; Criminology; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.0206372752287287,"score_gpt":0.31414653894605016,"score_spread":0.29350926371732144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1750103857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69943506,0.00007500421,4.1900475e-7,0.025902351,0.00021868905,0.00009605092,0.000049946524,0.000005292802,0.27421716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973379,0.000036484817,0.000012590115,0.0015822405,0.0006578735,0.0000140437205,0.0000022130948,0.0000013927896,0.0003553001],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942917,0.000046786405,0.00008904726,0.000072201525,0.00018765668,0.00017513392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997256,0.00011182067,0.000031830456,0.00007068471,0.00002311958,0.000036950667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008452519,0.00005176379,0.00009271595,0.0000064163055,0.0005010092,0.000018917099,0.00012517344,0.000026305283,0.00004067681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006201211,0.000033168017,0.000023200486,0.00010976128,0.00033643527,0.000030596693,0.000013040148,0.00005761796,0.0000046210885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057266125,0.000029725383,0.0021816941,5.236441e-7,0.000010726722,0.0000041879243,0.0029675537,0.000002077584,0.000047103815,0.993478,0.00075576757,0.0005169249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027030916,0.00002517705,0.066632375,0.000007796349,0.000028820798,4.336092e-7,0.0030234046,0.000003719689,0.00009045258,0.09105979,0.8387576,0.00010013328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9980572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9024182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000102213286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010531952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38534084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W17541795","doi":"10.1007/s10633-007-9061-1","title":"Patriation, Politics and Power: The State of Balance between the Supreme Court and Parliament after 30 Years of the Charter","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Charter; Constitution; Supreme court; Parliament; Judicial review; Politics; Separation of powers; Legislature; Legislation","score_opus":0.00669886340461423,"score_gpt":0.23615717096638736,"score_spread":0.22945830756177313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W17541795","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9888921,0.002133792,0.00016011135,0.008228044,0.00007152368,0.00009623102,0.000007948959,0.0000019220383,0.0004083538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968887,0.0027605235,0.0000019237066,0.00013508527,0.00014923744,0.0000019743038,9.48363e-8,0.0000019944732,0.000060472146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899435,0.00015517045,0.00014271184,0.00005331419,0.00025655123,0.00039792815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958247,0.00013033376,0.00011777279,0.000060023984,0.00008758803,0.000021834036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013995135,0.000044334134,0.000089241395,0.000009368675,0.00038130983,0.000020406764,0.00013414212,0.000016683023,0.0000061577803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008453214,0.000022214359,0.000031597465,0.00006743369,0.00057731534,0.00004003882,0.000036016427,0.0002383792,8.2314307e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017935432,0.00001901744,0.46169525,0.0000032801065,0.000217063,1.3345696e-7,0.012123123,0.000003801333,0.000029787112,0.51062626,0.00014119496,0.015123142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017331514,0.00006273838,0.5560554,0.0000151263275,0.000039829123,0.0000024769042,0.0027207136,0.000003446331,0.0000126155355,0.43234113,0.0085296,0.000043563057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009843683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016330213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09436018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000065608365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039812672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29327655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1755290261","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1257","title":"“Dollars Versus [Equality] Rights”: Money and the Limits on Distributive Justice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Distributive justice; Political science; Plaintiff; Law and economics; Supreme court; Adjudication; Government (linguistics); Social rights; Economics; Economic Justice; Law; Public economics; Politics","score_opus":0.08993198609582952,"score_gpt":0.3613987024357866,"score_spread":0.27146671633995706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1755290261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022323066,0.31104463,0.00004569811,0.035803147,0.0016386837,0.0009868302,0.000067782974,0.000068658446,0.64811224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.915212,0.08104095,0.000017673894,0.0029400904,0.0005892778,0.000044191,0.000006642468,0.0000035490718,0.00014565699],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984392,0.00046500907,0.00019609598,0.00014846251,0.00042224015,0.00032902323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879426,0.0007344667,0.00008146958,0.00013685104,0.0001259906,0.00012697621],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016297146,0.000121944686,0.0002925089,0.0000060319767,0.0015871578,0.000033673252,0.00017202497,0.00004526109,0.00008516448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068073464,0.0000724418,0.00009457782,0.00017516669,0.0014470336,0.0001588733,0.00005527611,0.00012710254,0.0001653949],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052477204,0.000026958898,0.00006176562,0.000065444,0.00004472237,5.279636e-7,0.000510553,9.4740024e-8,2.6950522e-7,0.99445605,0.0039514396,0.000829707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004156772,0.000019464385,0.00028495063,0.00045839025,0.00038971854,5.546997e-7,0.0002884867,3.5090895e-7,0.0000037469238,0.011103495,0.9869133,0.0001218124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004022208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023955703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98335254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007003794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053480748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1759993853","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1050","title":"What’s Law Good For?: An Empirical Overview of Charter Equality Rights Decisions","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Fundamental rights; Promotion (chess); Human rights","score_opus":0.22900690932000367,"score_gpt":0.4431924705097113,"score_spread":0.2141855611897076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1759993853","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041260943,0.65733176,0.0012076679,0.05426945,0.0025375935,0.0036151593,0.00020725929,0.00019666442,0.27650833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82259935,0.16384557,0.00056453556,0.012154496,0.00052664784,0.00014345093,0.000034258825,0.000011961577,0.00011974507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981399,0.00022146953,0.00048987975,0.0002848321,0.00055075315,0.00031312054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988703,0.0002051608,0.0001325498,0.00026798603,0.00035904135,0.00016492176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013103645,0.00014764775,0.0005358653,0.000013071846,0.00091477775,0.00005492353,0.0003271227,0.00008084571,0.00017592286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014067587,0.00011279031,0.00027536575,0.00022642864,0.00083449157,0.0006220483,0.000061001145,0.00008812317,0.000068261994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004406431,0.0001273169,0.000037961487,0.0001413654,0.000028641301,7.6725576e-7,0.00041815953,4.2165303e-7,0.000002819669,0.99684757,0.00096437114,0.001426189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015544433,0.000052154537,0.00010911341,0.002386271,0.00007770408,7.3746503e-7,0.00007466743,1.5701137e-7,0.000011086902,0.30070767,0.6963088,0.00011619749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010554377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.076351546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8184732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008769937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022037346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99603444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1764645577","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2660","title":"Taking purposes seriously: The purposive scope and textual bounds of interpretation under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Interpretation (philosophy); Jurisprudence; Law; Supreme court; Constitution; Political science; Legitimacy; Context (archaeology); Originalism; Meaning (existential); Judicial interpretation; Scope (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01907488820453316,"score_gpt":0.240325353376364,"score_spread":0.22125046517183083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1764645577","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6578853,0.006822509,0.00022733521,0.005759897,0.0002917775,0.00030910125,0.000027054137,0.0000049405576,0.32867205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996399,0.0001799583,0.000037765563,0.00004564673,0.000046893572,6.208651e-8,2.2314171e-7,7.5686114e-7,0.000048753544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953514,0.000081083876,0.00007209031,0.000045153003,0.00018194817,0.00008455223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947387,0.00004672538,0.00014691209,0.000032744265,0.0002217414,0.00007799233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028442746,0.00003837263,0.000090143396,0.000011736441,0.0012422787,0.00002721153,0.00013168548,0.000029069608,0.00005228408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017780749,0.00002530954,0.000025827027,0.000022858932,0.0018625588,0.00024809045,0.00003538245,0.000054155833,2.4022776e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007860738,0.00001597528,0.0026167098,0.0000031965542,0.00016058114,0.0000050032236,0.090905294,0.000017845126,0.000040871753,0.9018809,0.0005696231,0.003705359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016866424,0.00052880426,0.12426121,0.00033671974,0.0003765823,0.000057525718,0.65442497,0.00009556626,0.00008969043,0.09697346,0.12085738,0.00031144897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9596109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8049075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014151105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023116714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95547295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1766867618","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1280","title":"Doré, Proportionality and the Virtues of Judicial Craft","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Craft; Categorization; Supreme court; Law; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Law and economics; History; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02968401836408885,"score_gpt":0.30799844209765986,"score_spread":0.278314423733571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1766867618","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009303441,0.39752015,0.000105155515,0.1937034,0.00046804885,0.0030011756,0.000023745975,0.00007677018,0.39579812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92389643,0.072664626,0.00004150533,0.0029050761,0.00021573005,0.00009331893,0.0000019837628,0.0000025738286,0.00017873435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988691,0.00021399149,0.00027971092,0.00011952513,0.00037862355,0.00013900202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931955,0.00013398925,0.00011377661,0.00009628286,0.00028965058,0.000046721045],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010815213,0.00007341785,0.00028684188,0.0000062189565,0.0005491035,0.000021974549,0.00014654748,0.000028344783,0.00052180036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034274775,0.000043180768,0.000090473215,0.000120328936,0.0028561687,0.00013353447,0.000062484556,0.00006613876,0.000058594436],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039101,0.000016045946,0.00070158456,0.00009507772,0.000025068854,2.2795965e-7,0.00016022283,3.3956294e-8,0.0000047430385,0.9903353,0.0048029576,0.003854868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019493254,0.000012284235,0.0039645797,0.00067554915,0.000086881526,9.984423e-7,0.00016628372,7.5698193e-7,0.000007972982,0.2819564,0.7128396,0.000093756076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03789688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003937317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.914593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017158156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011324464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1767597263","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0491.2010.01489.x","title":"Improving Russian Justice with Foreign Assistance: Model Courts and the Tactical Approach","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Governance","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Curriculum; Political science; Judicial reform; Law; Sociology; Public relations; Public administration","score_opus":0.01259842670787279,"score_gpt":0.24598415576485905,"score_spread":0.23338572905698626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1767597263","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052978437,0.000595752,0.026208656,0.0062080002,0.00021653196,0.00028888826,0.000018215496,0.00004793173,0.9134376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957256,0.000119350065,0.0029628123,0.0003301549,0.000277479,0.000025638454,2.873986e-7,0.000003671496,0.00055502536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991891,0.000024735313,0.000075462405,0.00016224649,0.00034722264,0.00020124255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996287,0.00010576972,0.0000810282,0.00008875271,0.000040846786,0.000054883436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033599438,0.00007240114,0.000105630876,0.0000034603315,0.0010691553,0.00006976503,0.0001348284,0.00004561911,0.0000069929806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023557639,0.00004226637,0.00002117683,0.00006368026,0.0016111971,0.00016027728,0.000037494214,0.00020528436,0.0000026424502],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006361704,0.000013745503,0.00051008974,0.0000046368477,0.00000816211,0.0000013655214,0.00075650704,0.000024129484,0.000011248478,0.9973006,0.00018202017,0.0011238669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006025241,0.00009451869,0.07606729,0.00011217594,0.0007059188,0.000045887493,0.012682299,0.07704965,0.000060047812,0.72554743,0.10026671,0.0013428137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002989584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028502725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9427471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026633039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001887691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8223186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1770814582","doi":"","title":"Writing the Unwritten: The Officialization of Constitutional Convention in Canada, the United Kingdom, New Zealand and Australia","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Convention; Law; Constitution; Political science; Kingdom; Politics; Government (linguistics); Public administration; History","score_opus":0.0545307910497036,"score_gpt":0.2849552033945558,"score_spread":0.23042441234485223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1770814582","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97768915,0.0010826829,0.0009329247,0.016607342,0.00031458927,0.000258615,0.000004172334,0.000006299982,0.003104202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987493,0.0006661414,0.0000028620173,0.00014379028,0.00021384639,0.000001985771,0.0000013692921,0.000001591499,0.00021906865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986829,0.00020812603,0.00021944886,0.00006641536,0.00029375035,0.0005293286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955004,0.00012679951,0.00014696641,0.000042619442,0.00010450584,0.000029092467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016228714,0.000060920756,0.00008025696,0.000033268407,0.0010317956,0.000025387448,0.00018464425,0.000027139955,0.000033248478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013005997,0.000032209693,0.000029103081,0.00031018993,0.0009697956,0.00007076303,0.000021498987,0.00045800954,8.2183305e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014616467,0.0000066192642,0.07053505,4.319985e-7,0.000033558714,6.4293243e-7,0.0009939284,0.000025035188,0.0000046433643,0.9276804,0.00021595467,0.0004891651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000657951,0.000059487644,0.2147292,0.00007548687,0.00009129904,0.0000809031,0.04788731,0.0000442207,0.00002159478,0.7051865,0.031007618,0.00015842184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9631369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9886688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22249386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044929035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077591566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1773230185","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1265","title":"The Upside of Dissent in Equality Jurisprudence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Dissenting opinion; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Charter; Supreme court; Variety (cybernetics); Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.05014359831196368,"score_gpt":0.35891352240995905,"score_spread":0.30876992409799536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1773230185","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016633067,0.42995363,0.00004478782,0.08366074,0.0005010395,0.0017486683,0.000007795457,0.000043862303,0.46740642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8805069,0.11842829,0.00002269577,0.00075549056,0.00005719615,0.00006591581,5.3129133e-7,0.0000017476087,0.00016123978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988288,0.00022060855,0.00030023837,0.00010643798,0.00034791086,0.00019595878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935627,0.00023146995,0.00008350934,0.00013458535,0.00015046081,0.000043677457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011696238,0.00006197306,0.00020187446,0.0000055693563,0.00039019642,0.000020031048,0.00025753514,0.000022418153,0.00019615574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003519102,0.000038914957,0.000072648465,0.00019147433,0.000883077,0.00011319801,0.00006037501,0.00006946795,0.00011564843],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.9322524e-7,0.000013850192,0.0023036643,0.00007875524,0.000006934516,3.842151e-7,0.00020607484,1.5637735e-7,0.000007287329,0.99112695,0.0021128028,0.004142315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043189444,0.000008269783,0.010162856,0.0013161239,0.000016436981,2.3440124e-7,0.00032255778,7.2803454e-7,0.000016718988,0.070737965,0.91728604,0.00008886872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05492877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029830666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.920389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004259792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000099333374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9878724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1774047662","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1263","title":"Democracy and Dissent: Reconsidering the Judicial Review of the Political Sphere","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Dissent; Democracy; Supreme court; Law; Politics; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.05805980761421975,"score_gpt":0.30903144942230304,"score_spread":0.2509716418080833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1774047662","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00076391164,0.5944548,0.0000028991053,0.2590567,0.0002914327,0.0009839517,0.00000510064,0.000017229228,0.14442398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4772265,0.50124884,0.000027137497,0.021066407,0.00024986628,0.00005152049,6.69085e-7,0.000005099562,0.00012397632],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861187,0.0002924526,0.00033477973,0.00014091893,0.0003489268,0.00027107846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991838,0.00024056742,0.00010867732,0.0001909624,0.00019360265,0.000082443985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006061813,0.00010114808,0.00032586488,0.0000034713792,0.00097047293,0.00002400585,0.00025710062,0.000030243282,0.0008503175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008578762,0.000052833057,0.00014065688,0.00018057451,0.0015295312,0.00011698714,0.00013702281,0.00012542882,0.00005671751],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.3417248e-7,0.000009340268,0.00074787845,0.0014405114,0.000019872325,3.8195404e-7,0.000055573637,9.075004e-9,0.0000035175735,0.98076004,0.0120644905,0.004898082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004859424,0.000008227759,0.0016272315,0.030183263,0.00018411622,0.0000074123805,0.00034599003,4.2393165e-7,0.000008551596,0.177067,0.7903895,0.00012972724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008770129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034519592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.803693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030725918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015082871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99783057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1776435105","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1282","title":"Judging in Secular Times: Max Weber and the Rise of Proportionality","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Jurisprudence; Bureaucracy; Law; Metaphysics; Sociology; Churning; The Imaginary; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Economics; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.024508056357670546,"score_gpt":0.2971709197602406,"score_spread":0.27266286340257007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1776435105","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034912955,0.5833085,0.00003097062,0.08024391,0.00023906071,0.002845961,0.000011145066,0.000039062554,0.29836842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9484095,0.050172787,0.000044459062,0.0010680672,0.000053879558,0.00008567967,0.0000011103073,0.0000022158615,0.00016232907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990171,0.00022425619,0.00024481176,0.0001088547,0.00027569477,0.000129288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958056,0.00007982996,0.00007967237,0.00008595386,0.00014199862,0.000031983298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013143414,0.00006136754,0.00024192617,0.000008310261,0.00024341124,0.000015559888,0.00010656744,0.000024624911,0.00054207136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020339579,0.000037548143,0.00006187073,0.00014809523,0.001314356,0.00012014605,0.00005013817,0.00006728158,0.0000411033],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023201344,0.000016663715,0.0037347348,0.00016291096,0.000016613176,7.311554e-7,0.00027503632,2.8982257e-7,0.0000025559984,0.99235755,0.0020367182,0.0013938491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003604976,0.0000074132254,0.007974525,0.0018538699,0.00007545018,0.0000018999076,0.00034424735,0.000010202576,0.0000052164073,0.19617718,0.7930492,0.00014027963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023465917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029357537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9134965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023819694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000086878135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98303694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1780258276","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1095","title":"Right Theory, Wrong Reasons: Dynamic Interpretation, the Charter and “Fundamental Laws”","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Jurisprudence; Law; Charter; Meaning (existential); Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Adjudication; CLARITY; Surprise; Doctrine; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.010850614914889463,"score_gpt":0.28560949164065763,"score_spread":0.27475887672576815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1780258276","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032851186,0.42965788,0.00035560987,0.047080893,0.00052094634,0.001168846,0.000031491287,0.00011146823,0.51778775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9651098,0.030562075,0.000028043209,0.003164056,0.00016316549,0.000056144956,0.000010956945,0.00000530202,0.00090044935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989122,0.00026107967,0.00019973758,0.00017013204,0.00025995975,0.00019687743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995585,0.000143626,0.00006817168,0.00011165799,0.00008022016,0.00003781209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084611645,0.000104975596,0.00018631882,0.000008743189,0.0010494094,0.00006751214,0.00016503487,0.000030297493,0.00034850964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006207601,0.00006649767,0.000076058495,0.000110432215,0.0011170172,0.00015862923,0.00005052811,0.00008270578,0.00008067396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031068716,0.000015028999,0.00040375325,0.000041372714,0.000020390762,0.0000015887059,0.0002265503,9.8786074e-8,0.0000028945465,0.9932931,0.0032755218,0.0027166072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068556685,0.000010052563,0.0017816502,0.0007957476,0.00008140822,0.00000357462,0.00022014593,0.0000051517122,0.0000011679905,0.12760581,0.8693155,0.000111209985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031096872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01504939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9618247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006296283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005263855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83979124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1781206667","doi":"10.7202/1000568ar","title":"Réponse à James Tully. Le défi canadien : faire droit à deux visions différentes du pays","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Globe Revue internationale d’études québécoises","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Vision; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030242586794605803,"score_gpt":0.24410184528338696,"score_spread":0.21385925848878115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1781206667","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3162317,0.022863897,0.00034651966,0.04192232,0.004431814,0.0005717489,0.0006286845,0.00022006319,0.61278325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9723893,0.0097537115,0.00042086982,0.0012732802,0.0015525249,0.00010693418,0.000038065347,0.00003263408,0.014432701],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969281,0.00019737602,0.0006849216,0.00067262136,0.00069113204,0.00082583085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977911,0.0005233534,0.00034005826,0.0002884799,0.00064026826,0.00041674546],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004176707,0.00044048962,0.0005185903,0.0001890167,0.0012745813,0.00011138082,0.0010078455,0.00022513821,0.0011764623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00096948515,0.00047327142,0.00041551128,0.00053619605,0.0018600491,0.00063024537,0.00036121838,0.0002945111,0.00050480734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051416773,0.00062353205,0.032567523,0.000041214516,0.00044674284,0.00019438383,0.0058015324,0.000024612527,0.000024504068,0.94402784,0.0055860206,0.010610672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047417037,0.0001581187,0.06394457,0.0008107065,0.0002042353,0.00012584477,0.0075871265,0.00010667822,0.000054452656,0.063263126,0.86254853,0.00072245015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7411428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85836834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8807647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010463777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001561971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1781936603","doi":"10.21991/c9ft1n","title":"A Level Playing Field for Classical Liberalism: the Abolition of the Court Challenges Program Empowers a Diversity of Perspectives on Freedom and Equality","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Democracy; Supreme court; Parliament; Law; Sovereignty; Liberalism; Politics; Diversity (politics); Public administration","score_opus":0.12312341857132394,"score_gpt":0.31864253031266854,"score_spread":0.1955191117413446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1781936603","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23955387,0.009557647,0.0324643,0.19307053,0.006430789,0.008929077,0.003054339,0.00043105916,0.5065084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983524,0.00037363783,0.0006613597,0.00034622254,0.0001270131,0.00009272568,0.0000056350686,0.0000035003525,0.00003749392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981953,0.00014772866,0.00037054392,0.00033587223,0.0005531903,0.00039740358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983556,0.00056860544,0.000264948,0.00021228124,0.0005032465,0.00009526373],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006356125,0.00019441309,0.00030271575,0.00007332148,0.004010879,0.000023875436,0.0004129423,0.00016752265,0.000038655322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00091932254,0.00013257081,0.0002699866,0.0002055525,0.016477833,0.00025987142,0.00034708853,0.00020676473,0.0000021221558],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021731913,0.00029419237,0.010874676,0.0000199893,0.00013402433,7.217213e-7,0.007425276,0.000010225945,0.000015144274,0.97892135,0.0007770482,0.0013100242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034477217,0.0008762273,0.073200844,0.00076759927,0.0004604808,0.000036652236,0.21194564,0.00019752346,0.0003290688,0.62159616,0.08623565,0.0009064531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027156633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024701166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75879854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000115587616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007337916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1782429675","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2465089","title":"The Bungling of Justice Nadon's Appointment to the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Economic Justice; Political science","score_opus":0.009138267133878369,"score_gpt":0.24546404006465622,"score_spread":0.23632577293077786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1782429675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63125885,0.016708046,0.0132738305,0.2244938,0.0035087706,0.00081745343,0.000017037219,0.000022807499,0.109899394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976245,0.0013765919,0.000010692381,0.00018547988,0.00045163263,0.0000026566843,1.1658536e-7,0.000002375048,0.0003459464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982646,0.00013442189,0.00018856686,0.000060905524,0.00051704684,0.00083445077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924666,0.00027293776,0.00012556443,0.00007067997,0.00023335466,0.00005081828],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030422816,0.00005460477,0.000102009944,0.0000131202005,0.0015759936,0.000016127104,0.0003385454,0.000016786069,0.000006008603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000558976,0.000030466734,0.000046023448,0.00014001495,0.00021057605,0.000028161696,0.000033826185,0.00031896532,0.0000014781838],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018688992,0.000009379012,0.00035335158,0.0000014003914,0.00007358592,1.5767456e-7,0.0007865431,0.00019021398,0.000028093069,0.9907895,0.0010788928,0.006670232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031715634,0.0002859963,0.0018224599,0.00004950045,0.0001691058,0.000014409852,0.095370874,0.00005308283,0.00016718944,0.4628279,0.43875116,0.00017115622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39498407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96222067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56723654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053587015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062026246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1782738748","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2434504","title":"Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, Reasoning Introduction","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Rule of law; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.008682228525406418,"score_gpt":0.2605788716434362,"score_spread":0.2518966431180298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1782738748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56594086,0.01393247,0.027965918,0.20792207,0.001661437,0.00075961644,0.0000045526335,0.00010057836,0.18171251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99721617,0.0010328352,0.00004390015,0.000056952744,0.0012963458,0.000003947582,0.0000010020104,0.000001545034,0.0003473014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988646,0.00020138775,0.00017299349,0.00008785201,0.00025931463,0.00041388816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995072,0.00006504038,0.00015302985,0.00005234834,0.00019653443,0.000025884716],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004194269,0.000045000557,0.0000965258,0.000016608104,0.0015267814,0.00002714589,0.00009493464,0.000026783156,0.000013927597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030961496,0.000028118697,0.00003775125,0.000084887084,0.0012000438,0.000115053546,0.000013676769,0.0003217935,0.0000032654782],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027440794,0.000011705948,0.0004632957,8.485986e-7,0.000031843672,2.1049356e-8,0.00074770144,0.0000037648526,0.000012475689,0.996193,0.000055442513,0.0024524971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022300781,0.000015787788,0.0014342453,0.0000046264913,0.000028795714,0.000012713462,0.0012468067,0.0000073896767,0.000019310077,0.9377905,0.059179556,0.000037219754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006448076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006656465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43127534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001549941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051413843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1789597661","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1300","title":"Charter Right or Charter-Lite?: Administrative Discretion and the Charter","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Discretion; Law; Adjudication; Proportionality (law); Supreme court; Constitutional law; Judicial review; Deference; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04309848991795947,"score_gpt":0.3308592416274241,"score_spread":0.28776075170946463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1789597661","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019226877,0.09530396,0.0012103529,0.26462016,0.0012351493,0.003373053,0.00007924132,0.00019031348,0.63206506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9405078,0.046858154,0.000030308553,0.009959928,0.0007432046,0.0001794143,0.000010766134,0.000007942277,0.0017024708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840355,0.00044311018,0.0002733477,0.00024784036,0.0003637024,0.0002684403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928427,0.00021263197,0.00010621264,0.00017029209,0.00012867221,0.00009792022],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012573492,0.00015611664,0.00038114324,0.00001035062,0.0010921856,0.00008259231,0.0001932896,0.00005046956,0.0011434727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014766441,0.0000813249,0.00011238582,0.00013110308,0.0017778534,0.00020509784,0.000037983074,0.00011925007,0.00018780884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027433447,0.000019127914,0.000051089602,0.00009820687,0.000034249595,0.000001705928,0.0011169197,6.854319e-9,0.000002331576,0.9902973,0.0027010255,0.0056505892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032627824,0.000047261205,0.00034898566,0.00083614636,0.000096597265,0.0000040915575,0.00017317425,0.0000051457287,0.0000044390217,0.01590995,0.9821004,0.00014748341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007767302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003808786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97939944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026602027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000073020994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1791025234","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1317","title":"Pluralism, Disagreement, and Globalization: A Comment on Webber's \"Legal Pluralism and Human Agency\"","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Globalization; Legal pluralism; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Positive economics; Epistemology; Social science; Philosophy; Economics; Legal realism; Comparative law","score_opus":0.020993031358961353,"score_gpt":0.2891255424777083,"score_spread":0.2681325111187469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1791025234","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04161676,0.0011903782,0.00007651595,0.035400506,0.00038536257,0.00016877899,0.000020837808,0.000039167015,0.9211017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960256,0.00034590808,0.00007243931,0.0023384362,0.00083238207,0.0000045673787,0.0000063131865,0.0000051479337,0.00036920112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873894,0.000117435724,0.00023936598,0.00016755106,0.0004528399,0.0002838811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956155,0.000036556565,0.000116337935,0.000058812413,0.0000860418,0.00014070571],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031730044,0.00013264724,0.00015954026,0.00002908676,0.0034480693,0.0003048842,0.00011635213,0.000057139478,0.00013298694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015469821,0.00011236083,0.000049652957,0.000090818816,0.0006739538,0.00024817037,0.00006218712,0.00014166418,0.000007971598],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009272966,0.00005536125,0.005188179,0.000001648681,0.000027541731,0.000026269403,0.00047267266,0.0000083429095,0.000018979044,0.98691106,0.006844119,0.0004365251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008007919,0.000112208254,0.021142926,0.00009167912,0.000054157026,0.00004544301,0.0009368371,0.000004111577,0.000017174545,0.41983864,0.5566892,0.00026682208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23084801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27945176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9544088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011220646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000371952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1798857825","doi":"10.21991/c9995r","title":"THE CHARTER REVOLUTION: IS IT UNDEMOCRATIC?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Legislature; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.062082940363001854,"score_gpt":0.2909810495467232,"score_spread":0.22889810918372136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1798857825","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005797438,0.0030886028,0.027493363,0.070241615,0.004467567,0.00086563855,0.00015868818,0.00027696474,0.8928278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870468,0.0011254343,0.00054827606,0.0063933763,0.00059581693,0.00018011559,0.000021977587,0.000009671293,0.004078528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99627584,0.00017865987,0.00072885834,0.0005809493,0.0010071378,0.0012285342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979116,0.00032460756,0.00024280192,0.00043651287,0.00072169234,0.00036281405],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088279275,0.0003800138,0.00034285878,0.00013547286,0.013295325,0.00018843047,0.0007566315,0.00025561263,0.0016563154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006926485,0.00030233327,0.00034682345,0.0006368866,0.024551116,0.0008465523,0.00023186898,0.0003748105,0.0017990705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055094795,0.00008595133,0.008063775,0.0000031901718,0.00012535868,0.000015167483,0.0010938419,0.0000039228057,0.000008712517,0.8917828,0.09771571,0.001046443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045734958,0.000037348265,0.00090598286,0.00007389601,0.000061875,0.00004838253,0.011714906,0.000028423725,0.00004606872,0.24790552,0.7383287,0.0003915695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022433256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049126185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98646706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043286962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003036398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1800594458","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1288","title":"Structure, Substance and Spirit: Lessons in Constitutional Architecture from the Senate Reform Reference","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Constitutional law; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Constitutional theory; Architecture; Meaning (existential); Originalism; Separation of powers; Sociology; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.046306889773417265,"score_gpt":0.3107093154795224,"score_spread":0.26440242570610517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1800594458","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036558304,0.4003504,0.0004186968,0.20631084,0.00071309885,0.0013883122,0.0005341096,0.00012419566,0.35360208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9560231,0.039557517,0.00011206186,0.0040385267,0.00020843337,0.000015735537,0.000018052135,0.0000028715012,0.000023700319],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987209,0.00021415653,0.0002268593,0.00024562873,0.00034992903,0.00024256237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994295,0.00017263752,0.00007558432,0.00015907497,0.00009673931,0.000066430766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057651644,0.00012842714,0.00027239046,0.00001085544,0.0007336283,0.00003807339,0.00025511623,0.000060866107,0.00011231412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018705004,0.00008116664,0.000043214673,0.00018838515,0.002478863,0.00010008328,0.000052965792,0.00024473193,0.000017154276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035935961,0.0000067129668,0.0007072223,0.00003322101,0.00001042855,0.0000014057451,0.00018753702,9.830608e-7,0.0000160427,0.9946275,0.00031448514,0.004090871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011359278,0.0000060783314,0.0043962365,0.0013922735,0.00002602986,0.000002275296,0.000075916985,9.2466945e-7,0.000008205646,0.17089999,0.8229507,0.0001277713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015253819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16160135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9194648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008717636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013235628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9913037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1802821383","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1006","title":"Legal Rights in the Supreme Court of Canada in 2000: Seeing the “Big Picture”","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03115717487364522,"score_gpt":0.2820236901224373,"score_spread":0.25086651524879205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1802821383","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022329526,0.17036374,0.000010346249,0.073664606,0.00079226936,0.0015168965,0.000024689609,0.000023928073,0.731274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796713,0.015422117,0.000006534349,0.0043426435,0.00025003604,0.000039519695,0.0000027737567,0.0000034156621,0.0002616616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978048,0.00044496,0.0004174054,0.00018319055,0.00075191265,0.0003976819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924755,0.0002636906,0.00010408402,0.00021351753,0.00012335177,0.000047784903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017783212,0.00014014059,0.0003575985,0.00001902606,0.0006592236,0.000028452505,0.0005696719,0.000046269437,0.00017281942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017751259,0.00007779253,0.00008678805,0.00057504757,0.0005354457,0.00010813349,0.000050218503,0.000238279,0.000008261501],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007706486,0.00005020631,0.0034641263,0.00008548597,0.000024520763,0.000059825677,0.00144171,0.000014443323,0.0000026791654,0.97888565,0.014812503,0.0011511324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010322818,0.000008103998,0.0031508184,0.0008223337,0.000028400336,0.000005323381,0.0004195675,0.0000019055395,0.0000025517447,0.0067612394,0.98858786,0.00010867273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91418374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.994436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9737753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022174706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011334103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50702816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1806348090","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1010","title":"The Increasing Irrelevance of Section 1 of the Charter","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Strong","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Deference; Adjudication; Law; Political science; Section (typography); Standard of review; Law and economics; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.03454020563628922,"score_gpt":0.30545051391948946,"score_spread":0.27091030828320023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1806348090","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054961324,0.41852778,0.00005040932,0.03799443,0.0017448481,0.0011201008,0.000011030177,0.000038326645,0.48555174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8773091,0.12192637,0.000007367211,0.00046651313,0.00016353602,0.000008715101,2.2063728e-7,0.0000016780925,0.000116504445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914217,0.00020655453,0.00019157749,0.00006631421,0.00028225794,0.00011115467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943125,0.00014799486,0.00012100655,0.000119295706,0.00016410025,0.000016369853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009230216,0.00004585321,0.00013887594,0.0000034877737,0.0006836161,0.000006932417,0.00018411584,0.000019568175,0.000046025056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027640854,0.000024406037,0.000092861315,0.00021429088,0.0007559384,0.000060725495,0.000036181213,0.000056565135,0.000006578579],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009710182,0.000024163686,0.0054785856,0.00012981406,0.0000413194,2.8706165e-7,0.00032881912,6.367511e-7,0.00011978138,0.9811921,0.00200944,0.010665311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031124233,0.000006276902,0.0040353495,0.001068457,0.00003536669,0.0000015256852,0.00009565705,5.59619e-7,0.000025376026,0.0064862547,0.9881783,0.000035741476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064084055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073655318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98616886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002538698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007092852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9687635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1806762695","doi":"10.24124/c677/2014566","title":"Constitutional Peace, Political Order, or Good Government? Organizing and Assessing Scholarly Views on the 2008 Prorogation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Political Science Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Discretion; Strengths and weaknesses; Politics; Political science; Public administration; Prime minister; Government (linguistics); Order (exchange); Governor; Law; Sociology; Psychology; Engineering; Economics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07202555899951776,"score_gpt":0.34404058495219575,"score_spread":0.272015025952678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1806762695","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034285467,0.0058594192,0.00024263268,0.23453534,0.0003214713,0.0007663363,0.000036582605,0.00003866805,0.754771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9741558,0.0012379377,0.00015443456,0.0239869,0.00029347494,0.00002435188,0.0000012443415,0.0000031001864,0.00014274557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968092,0.00026072207,0.00024629754,0.00032544215,0.0010000435,0.0013583394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974589,0.0004623012,0.000054333716,0.00014423304,0.00029731993,0.0015829642],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032307392,0.00013076222,0.00021703096,0.000032261265,0.0034662494,0.00052630255,0.00034953357,0.0000543894,0.00028895773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0167216,0.00008218745,0.0000375445,0.00088444207,0.0073792217,0.00068839715,0.000059137117,0.00022144827,0.0001174297],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.3133025e-7,0.000008918598,0.001101951,0.000023392315,0.000002956136,0.0000022847162,0.000034388857,2.542184e-8,0.000005158406,0.99375045,0.00049464015,0.0045754034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009400593,0.000042590924,0.0095601445,0.0012930855,0.000046154215,0.00002134751,0.001099856,0.000014280419,0.00001474603,0.03565621,0.95190424,0.00025332934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04576082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06292439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97072726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001554511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055013765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1810894131","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1017","title":"Judicial Power and the Charter: Three Myths and a Political Analysis","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Statute; Charter; Political science; Judicial review; Politics; Nullification; Economic Justice; Judicial activism","score_opus":0.027073074012261434,"score_gpt":0.31015798586508303,"score_spread":0.2830849118528216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1810894131","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0064777383,0.30840468,0.00016790193,0.15608148,0.00018911736,0.0007721887,0.00001640525,0.000059517148,0.52783096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9154623,0.07678914,0.000012858516,0.007441836,0.00020683213,0.000024762781,0.0000015226557,0.0000027947183,0.000057920257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988341,0.00016110114,0.00019873369,0.00018831684,0.00031873395,0.00029903796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945796,0.00016419015,0.000043094336,0.000114624345,0.000097570664,0.00012254834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087493856,0.0001003224,0.0003976899,0.00002040308,0.00087385124,0.000054595832,0.000120185054,0.000038566133,0.00029179975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018354406,0.00006294492,0.0001394835,0.00036435763,0.0022349171,0.000089185414,0.000072580806,0.00008759747,0.00002604232],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008312542,0.0000098782975,0.0032506315,0.000015333555,0.00015682435,0.0000036815904,0.00020557817,1.4815151e-8,1.7447036e-7,0.99451864,0.0004811319,0.0013497765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030328258,0.000016879028,0.007429908,0.00023658673,0.00113957,0.0000067882543,0.00031353434,0.000004833539,1.3562509e-7,0.09784008,0.89255947,0.00014895841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009237306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019603942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9089846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023953255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005576579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W181756690","doi":"","title":"Prime Minister's Questions in the United Kingdom","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prime minister; Kingdom; Session (web analytics); Prime (order theory); Political science; Law; Business; Politics; Advertising; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09963232056872982,"score_gpt":0.3491114278414512,"score_spread":0.24947910727272138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W181756690","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04385373,0.4086249,0.000011244669,0.24150033,0.0014200999,0.0022738543,0.00010259735,0.000054755183,0.3021585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9317682,0.020621693,0.000025735504,0.047065474,0.00033018755,0.000079206795,0.000028938988,0.000003221702,0.00007735348],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989758,0.0002761423,0.00014669923,0.00007847768,0.00016330509,0.0003595749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995553,0.00006843421,0.000031939628,0.00010411778,0.000025020916,0.00021521047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077611726,0.0000689448,0.000119733864,0.00006241562,0.0005385533,0.000021060321,0.00020415972,0.000024796069,0.0003918946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010211099,0.00005172531,0.000043608474,0.0005198383,0.00025673895,0.00011697227,0.000010410317,0.00008967545,0.00017298007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001716488,0.00008670668,0.15311193,0.00009280038,0.000048137863,0.000029636773,0.005319482,4.2312485e-7,7.758193e-7,0.6413041,0.18058586,0.019418474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029315184,0.0000041339254,0.014912056,0.00043868445,0.000028125512,0.0000022326221,0.0010178607,9.617745e-8,1.19156624e-7,0.00041042393,0.9830851,0.000071842194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8624529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85801345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8879145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002899678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004083419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42909712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1819974348","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1293","title":"Charter Values: The Uncanny Valley of Canadian Constitutionalism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Political science; Statutory law; Constitutionalism; Meaning (existential); Supreme court; Ambiguity; Psychology; Democracy; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0444263019188654,"score_gpt":0.2952148533338901,"score_spread":0.25078855141502465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1819974348","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019748695,0.055898223,0.00004893065,0.06650688,0.0005705814,0.00048555864,0.000036111127,0.000026236436,0.87623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9292358,0.053703804,0.00005289442,0.015931198,0.0005356881,0.000044519038,0.00000996289,0.000005134011,0.0004809744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986985,0.00024759883,0.00024339756,0.00014112571,0.00040545652,0.00026394668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991848,0.00013471754,0.00007747225,0.00017319662,0.00029043303,0.00013940563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013619165,0.00009518512,0.00025358595,0.000036267047,0.0010298173,0.000018861274,0.0003098173,0.00004290193,0.0005860292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003556908,0.00006417416,0.00012138459,0.00034946235,0.0018612894,0.00008231919,0.000028814246,0.00008746128,0.00016898659],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.575749e-7,0.0000063951775,0.00015776581,0.000048487014,0.000024570301,5.626751e-7,0.00023137436,6.48069e-7,0.0000013918077,0.9727941,0.025938287,0.0007958224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049008773,0.000007912207,0.00028492877,0.0006372888,0.00005714876,0.0000012664309,0.0000842636,0.0000010332777,0.0000021009141,0.030932965,0.967858,0.000084038256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48928282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54177827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94191974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006871893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066134956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79206264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1822634312","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199246687.001.0001","title":"Sceptical Essays on Human Rights","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":171,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Democracy; Politics; Political science; Skepticism; Government (linguistics); Law; International human rights law; Bill of rights; Articulation (sociology); Fundamental rights; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.061843301195930074,"score_gpt":0.3428695796346789,"score_spread":0.28102627843874883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1822634312","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000023850795,0.00006492691,0.000012608371,0.0009318063,0.00036530392,0.00013934274,0.0000060436187,0.000110786714,0.9983453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014378272,0.00004323605,0.000013468064,0.00038383665,0.0025558227,0.000007630505,0.000013995217,0.0000056519243,0.98259807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875265,0.000036950452,0.00014415775,0.0002345153,0.00057415105,0.0002575929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959385,0.00009208388,0.000041508687,0.00009210837,0.00007877777,0.0001016786],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015441564,0.00014855505,0.00022024167,0.000051845247,0.002138174,0.000042522344,0.00020168076,0.00025409498,0.0043956307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021389715,0.00011540032,0.000115798844,0.000053124193,0.0011921069,0.00003405116,0.000040083876,0.00022254066,0.0023137764],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017228999,0.000020958701,0.000008538152,7.663808e-7,0.000019333651,0.000014567935,0.00009742815,8.5274216e-8,1.0318271e-7,0.7709918,0.2285848,0.0002599188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003207415,0.000018253335,0.00001743531,0.000027918353,0.000011959537,1.6418296e-7,0.000022487005,2.5767537e-8,2.5584413e-7,0.45261323,0.5471592,0.00009697749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058935396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03396966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3185744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026168715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002656133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1830862541","doi":"10.7202/1024392ar","title":"John T. Saywell. The Lawmakers. Judicial Power and the Shaping of Canadian Federalism. Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 2002. 453 p.","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Mens Revue d histoire intellectuelle et culturelle","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Power (physics); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.02170413434487513,"score_gpt":0.22468845288841363,"score_spread":0.2029843185435385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1830862541","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009126568,0.4016687,0.000049460497,0.04269644,0.0015881445,0.00050327345,0.00008981356,0.000016677444,0.55247486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8329056,0.11840242,0.00014541729,0.0009175744,0.00038111827,0.000006260814,0.000007985399,0.000021886395,0.04721172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797773,0.00041737637,0.00039931806,0.0003565813,0.00037423213,0.00047475394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986506,0.00028577933,0.00027953886,0.0002489051,0.00035432866,0.00018082066],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070156646,0.00027813722,0.0005324278,0.000018517516,0.003359297,0.000041500225,0.000499068,0.00024654888,0.0024206268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027868157,0.00020745826,0.00027733957,0.00023671072,0.006429019,0.00024496778,0.0001801611,0.0002945102,0.000022832528],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021137166,0.00010259891,0.000013960588,0.000041060845,0.0002807499,0.00001978639,0.15947576,0.00025271674,0.00004574979,0.66576785,0.17239755,0.0013908413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008069695,0.000096789714,0.000059947186,0.00024898764,0.00018316656,0.000015415684,0.029235646,0.000030199508,0.000036098794,0.0041643293,0.9648826,0.00023983448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9857742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9909115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.831993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014095806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064721034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1832873546","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1016","title":"Inclusion, Voice, and Process-Based Constitutionalism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Constitution; Democracy; Fundamental rights; Duty; Constitutional law; Framing (construction); Charter; Law; Sociology; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.017067574949490773,"score_gpt":0.289730102499441,"score_spread":0.2726625275499502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1832873546","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013173009,0.0015591283,0.0005226667,0.016614785,0.0003781256,0.00018346444,0.0000062615127,0.000048728838,0.96751386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969495,0.00016268983,0.0003562229,0.0018614051,0.00052952743,0.000014044937,0.0000016059959,0.0000037767904,0.00012121103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879825,0.00008453183,0.00019456678,0.00013210284,0.00052122027,0.00026935127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991292,0.000093230985,0.00009675278,0.000045522607,0.00041731243,0.00021800416],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042883636,0.00009795613,0.00013306053,0.000037806316,0.0065951385,0.00017596161,0.00016734055,0.00007084802,0.0005323606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014831086,0.000080116275,0.0000483381,0.00012299142,0.0015155576,0.00039894757,0.00010232659,0.00019611628,0.00011508682],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054219286,0.000037661786,0.0022908656,0.0000031676743,0.00001748864,0.000009532691,0.00075612304,0.000019346035,0.00003312523,0.9948001,0.0008732701,0.0011539129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038704567,0.00002447369,0.0022290319,0.000059034614,0.000019945583,0.00003289761,0.000992997,0.000026291726,0.000032443826,0.9157732,0.08026261,0.00016001382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07297208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06749069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9837765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006500775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038353927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99469817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1833416941","doi":"10.14288/bcs.v0i162.272","title":"A Court Between: Aboriginal and Treaty Rights in the British Columbia Court of Appeal","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Treaty; Jurisprudence; Law of the case; Majority opinion; Court of record; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.012690893745926956,"score_gpt":0.2757797758487931,"score_spread":0.26308888210286613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1833416941","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8086768,0.00075177045,0.000005756964,0.0026789678,0.00008351399,0.00021423478,0.000034985886,0.000023890596,0.1875301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984656,0.00017981816,0.00005810366,0.00042143228,0.00042632362,0.000008600431,0.000003598132,0.000001654121,0.00043488698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988588,0.00012516817,0.00019366146,0.00017384024,0.0003961274,0.00025237256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959713,0.000104234,0.000058904297,0.00008176589,0.00007044493,0.000087515546],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005061327,0.00006921536,0.00021093905,0.000011557061,0.0013593253,0.0003161558,0.00019543317,0.00007176938,0.00007469364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033456858,0.00007305051,0.000046710797,0.00022360304,0.0007987415,0.00015427402,0.0000119475535,0.00015503033,0.000012460606],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017450211,0.00017377108,0.3372785,0.0000057475454,0.000035472924,0.00006485016,0.001413423,8.285255e-7,0.000010366618,0.6379935,0.019050293,0.0039557884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003932033,0.00007845614,0.50177425,0.00006484689,0.000026620415,0.0000045281904,0.00084913406,6.0764904e-7,0.0000030220478,0.092307255,0.40437675,0.000121354504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66936326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8384394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54568624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006176833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013744179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1837442214","doi":"","title":"The Rights' Orchestra: Proportionality, Balancing, and Viking","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Coase theorem; Proportionality (law); Treaty; Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Human rights; Law and economics; Mathematical economics; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.009256480103395255,"score_gpt":0.2780686582298318,"score_spread":0.26881217812643654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1837442214","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9153453,0.0031046672,0.0004058728,0.017769637,0.0009397662,0.00015405567,0.0000012719191,0.00003959931,0.062239826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956966,0.0021138827,0.000021714868,0.00005510295,0.0010392723,0.0000035056898,2.4626326e-7,0.0000024503242,0.0010672427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983484,0.000063511965,0.00013932322,0.000093227114,0.00033075258,0.0010247596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960357,0.00009787092,0.00008300656,0.000044991873,0.00010500487,0.00006554424],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028105276,0.00006286318,0.0000695317,0.000017256329,0.0042511467,0.00012045565,0.00016412842,0.00004669485,0.00001776951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019564012,0.000038607275,0.00004193663,0.000091913134,0.0007356297,0.00012201266,0.00002940148,0.0011510357,0.000008836406],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004984198,0.0000086788605,0.008374546,2.414677e-7,0.000031738662,0.0000010207552,0.00032587242,1.2618571e-7,0.000067626825,0.9839067,0.00007083529,0.0072076484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007885935,0.000019139865,0.0056099836,0.0000032513924,0.000010022287,0.000059524755,0.0017496586,0.0000011280346,0.000007400178,0.85753983,0.13486421,0.00005700515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038705913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18537493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18150434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001665628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020809856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99704516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W184083580","doi":"10.21991/c91089","title":"FARCE OR TRAGEDY?: JUDICIAL BACKLASH AND JUSTICE MCCLUNG","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Backlash; Economic Justice; Tragedy (event); Law; Political science; Sociology; Engineering; Mechanical engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.06409486659759038,"score_gpt":0.2975601136211885,"score_spread":0.2334652470235981,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W184083580","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014818461,0.0028356693,0.045089442,0.007714862,0.0053759078,0.0012749812,0.00035000563,0.0006182961,0.9219224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932841,0.00087954465,0.0018776593,0.0022304857,0.0007103065,0.000105862084,0.000032134587,0.00001329379,0.00086663367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963384,0.00017413068,0.0006880073,0.00074816943,0.0008559997,0.001195279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812317,0.00035347973,0.0002255711,0.00026189935,0.00050189206,0.00053397723],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069850567,0.0004546376,0.00051145273,0.00026650206,0.0067562456,0.00014067096,0.0004776492,0.00032714763,0.0013671106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013036011,0.00041296508,0.00021144637,0.0006842976,0.020867154,0.0010523781,0.00028684823,0.00042251815,0.00038901746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024072113,0.0001662735,0.00986363,0.000019165745,0.00012840517,0.00009344669,0.001178831,0.000014421601,0.000040408948,0.9820551,0.0038337086,0.0023658634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027906774,0.00023953064,0.007047903,0.0003605767,0.00065887143,0.00044800274,0.026106363,0.00010333331,0.00016091457,0.22424097,0.7362116,0.0016312244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044115754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008474964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9784656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002904151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032863426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1847759711","doi":"","title":"Rights and the rule of law in the balance","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Law; Political science; Human rights; Rule of law; Due process; Public law; Balance (ability); International human rights law; Reservation of rights; Fundamental rights; Municipal law; Law and economics; Sociology; Right to property; Politics","score_opus":0.046981330048151616,"score_gpt":0.36104031169767514,"score_spread":0.3140589816495235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1847759711","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9171705,0.00046176618,0.0000015574033,0.02820448,0.000097369695,0.00053091365,0.000074815485,0.0000036475312,0.053454947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99666244,0.0019118674,0.00022091386,0.00089629804,0.00022086402,0.000022325345,0.0000012484005,0.0000046193063,0.000059420592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99595004,0.00027525303,0.00085398834,0.0005873311,0.00046866998,0.001864699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99529654,0.0021728852,0.0001746084,0.00035278118,0.00056282943,0.001440337],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010073825,0.00018912235,0.0005831811,0.00031656562,0.0013049653,0.00043488582,0.0012279856,0.00011152935,0.00009534531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026665889,0.00011867674,0.000089929745,0.0006490995,0.045413777,0.0010405936,0.0005948029,0.00047626995,0.000014811073],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003662347,0.00007961255,0.008803389,0.00001081278,0.000007745198,4.251596e-7,0.00028062478,0.0000063101656,0.0000610937,0.9904504,0.000021498945,0.00024149174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009041088,0.00014908939,0.0892062,0.000043341908,0.000011577168,0.0000063829025,0.002705087,0.001458956,0.0002710751,0.90072066,0.0043441155,0.00017939748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13540736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062586013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12914875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027019886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001957512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1848768895","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199664603.003.0001","title":"The Global Model of Constitutional Rights","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":101,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Fundamental rights; Autonomy; Proportionality (law); Judicial review; Democracy; Law and economics; Constitutional theory; International human rights law; Right to property; Law; Constitutional court; Constitutional law; Sociology; Politics; Constitution","score_opus":0.043067364306805925,"score_gpt":0.2405462042838313,"score_spread":0.19747883997702537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1848768895","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000016599011,0.0005245701,0.00047678273,0.00007439405,0.00023954407,0.00017982702,0.0002959232,0.00003335894,0.998159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05729127,0.0010902189,0.00008945954,0.000025380747,0.00025369864,6.0349214e-7,0.0000072549437,0.00000329045,0.9412388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990579,0.000026670687,0.00012093186,0.00014619378,0.00042237053,0.00022593373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934113,0.00007922765,0.00015480799,0.00012420306,0.00020344704,0.000097156706],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013930775,0.00013973388,0.00018473082,0.00002021947,0.0018596317,0.000016892694,0.0003797037,0.00019512088,0.000019799996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009465185,0.00011689065,0.0001552043,0.0000071235386,0.005852904,0.0000694454,0.0001875659,0.00013841924,0.0000016057802],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003638097,0.000005745188,0.0000142198505,0.000002782529,0.000108798245,0.00000299257,0.00016815073,0.000015981472,2.4205377e-7,0.99780905,0.00070293125,0.0011327309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008956447,0.0000047985814,0.0000033782405,0.00002601849,0.00009040328,4.337495e-7,0.000055181445,0.000007566947,0.0000014525817,0.18694384,0.8126671,0.00011026092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013785722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018451271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81196415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024805608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051140966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99943984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1852276984","doi":"","title":"Globalization of Judgment: Transjudicialism and the Five Faces of International Law in Domestic Courts","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Municipal law; Law; International law; Political science; Jurisdiction; Treaty; Comparative law; Common law; Public law","score_opus":0.01106974753380847,"score_gpt":0.26542746290054214,"score_spread":0.2543577153667337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1852276984","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7362437,0.046739623,0.0019909213,0.030169543,0.00083329296,0.00051647477,0.000021256763,0.000017952108,0.18346722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97388923,0.025835028,0.0000058859127,0.00007378473,0.00009416585,0.0000020267955,4.3498233e-7,0.0000015442504,0.00009790938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895185,0.00010887389,0.00021602373,0.00006119936,0.00031282438,0.00034925525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964416,0.00008854488,0.00013023686,0.000024322533,0.00009471763,0.000018003448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010100944,0.000048593953,0.000130487,0.00004033074,0.00023447674,0.000014149851,0.00013979452,0.000030472424,0.000030156609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001003705,0.00003508851,0.00004101501,0.00012879795,0.0008720684,0.00010543766,0.000012953708,0.0001984339,8.048791e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031396874,0.000029975501,0.0015080362,0.0000010573724,0.000054223405,6.631187e-7,0.004283776,0.00004834098,0.000008076268,0.9922576,0.000011617257,0.0017652655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010916125,0.000042368516,0.0015200089,0.000036450514,0.00002990892,0.00001575965,0.007409107,0.00008588502,0.000008138092,0.98827124,0.0014376149,0.000051899064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008176912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026778117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2376455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017886887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021334081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99842775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1863593433","doi":"","title":"Legal reasoning and Bills of Rights","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Principle of legality; Political science; Public law; Philosophy of law; Common law; Comparative law; Sources of law; Municipal law; Civil law (Civil law); Private law","score_opus":0.0711276080582702,"score_gpt":0.367030046113885,"score_spread":0.2959024380556148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1863593433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92297107,0.00040977492,0.000005480966,0.0026692792,0.00017016368,0.00030892142,0.00015743413,0.000008846812,0.073299035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99535036,0.0026746807,0.0014040227,0.000186819,0.00027422965,0.000007005172,0.0000019440317,0.000008597788,0.00009232756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950685,0.00015820103,0.0010147644,0.0008657514,0.0004833547,0.0024094635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941652,0.00079650315,0.0002457351,0.00034833522,0.0008642783,0.003579983],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074129337,0.0002520754,0.00073675736,0.0007262374,0.0013622963,0.00027432447,0.00092979945,0.00017086879,0.00016848753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003751448,0.00021696156,0.00011252623,0.00078114215,0.030235095,0.0014224047,0.00083367835,0.00045909436,0.000011751958],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059964343,0.00012812074,0.02474132,0.00001630186,0.000017092589,0.0000015889188,0.00017009818,0.0000026607988,0.00020682167,0.9741472,0.000014733137,0.0004941194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009178945,0.0006962731,0.1643887,0.00013562529,0.000038899532,0.000020262269,0.003524026,0.0010613317,0.00380473,0.8181473,0.006768548,0.0004964129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09129964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047082677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15599987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004293099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00422133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1867821508","doi":"10.1515/9781553394518-005","title":"Should Canada Have a Representative Supreme Court?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Impartiality; Law; Political science; Majority opinion; Appeal; Certiorari; Judicial opinion; Supreme Court Decisions; Court of record; Original jurisdiction; Judicial activism; Dissenting opinion; Judicial review","score_opus":0.033605109379356055,"score_gpt":0.2548041082394787,"score_spread":0.22119899886012262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1867821508","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029984063,0.0000019075278,0.00003353775,0.0040902942,0.00022110123,0.00042795474,0.000116477306,0.00009101981,0.9920193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8769224,0.000044349665,0.00006943308,0.0004726714,0.000105951876,0.0000056381487,0.000004633089,0.0000067788383,0.12236814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845815,0.0001902893,0.00011892858,0.00029704956,0.00053579273,0.00039977828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990975,0.00014800591,0.00008029166,0.00015569807,0.0003118693,0.00020658103],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000101167476,0.00014413045,0.00019216795,0.000044995068,0.0017600637,0.000039308743,0.0003377416,0.00008431936,0.000113947026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007294259,0.00015179413,0.00007161229,0.000046565856,0.0006043453,0.00021493058,0.00022889739,0.0001691666,0.000011994274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027418071,0.000022844826,0.001214287,0.0000044460908,0.00011690154,0.000081815095,0.0016189034,0.000016622282,0.000013244222,0.9364274,0.060003173,0.00045290598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027638077,0.000014782116,0.0018443378,0.000016076008,0.00003847127,3.075804e-7,0.011555092,0.000007211901,0.00021926798,0.0014078843,0.98440135,0.00021883022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9923605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15736757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93501955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004709574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035982655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1873709627","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1016","title":"The Myths of Judicial Activism","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial activism; Charter; Political science; Law; Supreme court; Judicial review; Judicial independence; Constitution","score_opus":0.04556992038455407,"score_gpt":0.33264858021313276,"score_spread":0.2870786598285787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1873709627","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005383137,0.17392865,0.000031810654,0.026432429,0.00042583188,0.0003695768,0.0000040407817,0.00003419239,0.7982352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66695726,0.3307837,0.000013023975,0.0014994878,0.00035448695,0.000021841888,8.837197e-7,0.00000341613,0.00036588474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889314,0.00014078237,0.00022746684,0.00010904561,0.00040804094,0.00022151362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993798,0.00017385851,0.000097603974,0.00012670948,0.00017216725,0.00004982833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084295066,0.00007365975,0.00022892978,0.000006718579,0.0010882983,0.000017219387,0.00024787706,0.00003074513,0.0001782558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002846233,0.00004847582,0.00011657244,0.00023178179,0.0010323768,0.000088778295,0.00004717367,0.00007733244,0.00008170644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004680973,0.000017980175,0.00015818553,0.000028500694,0.000025258987,0.0000019253453,0.00014867795,8.8019966e-8,0.0000067800397,0.9736162,0.0077961753,0.018195556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004321306,0.000011023924,0.00022751586,0.0004583053,0.00004075001,0.0000010668633,0.0001778252,1.8694624e-7,0.0000063203724,0.019450415,0.9795211,0.00006229904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043590455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075076832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9717249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035939884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001638444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8370421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1875728696","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Attempt and Enlightenment of China Democratic League (1941-1948)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher education of social science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; China; Political science; Constitution; Enlightenment; Politics; Law; Communism; Socialism; Ideology; Premise; Political economy; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.039812193087742934,"score_gpt":0.3377758574057707,"score_spread":0.2979636643180278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1875728696","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28938004,0.00070198823,0.00005802292,0.0046026427,0.0015599629,0.00020564624,0.000008947907,0.00001954013,0.7034632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979339,0.00003194293,0.00028573297,0.00013488701,0.00030514668,0.000011438922,0.0000013524632,0.0000011256615,0.0012944563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986455,0.00005271409,0.00020483395,0.00016870226,0.0007556172,0.00017262691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992015,0.00003853826,0.00015102663,0.00005210111,0.00042552777,0.00013132823],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071187754,0.000066313114,0.00014045098,0.000053457377,0.00080917374,0.000022886674,0.00019090397,0.000040957348,0.00008905848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014957598,0.00006161757,0.000029060344,0.00054095587,0.009346449,0.00026487844,0.000056440032,0.000046457473,0.0000073110377],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000449873,0.000098723125,0.012392432,0.0000037847524,0.0000054311,1.00809395e-7,0.0061744787,9.7372e-7,0.0003032788,0.9785084,0.0014251991,0.0010826819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003084037,0.00006291098,0.7249869,0.000052667703,0.00003571193,0.0000014942519,0.010190663,0.0000021930778,0.00058164727,0.15320243,0.11035328,0.00022167506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024814825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003272701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.825306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016483133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024615997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99334955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1877581437","doi":"","title":"The Charter’s Legislative Override: Feat or Figment of the Constitutional Imagination?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; CONTEST; Legislature; Negotiation; Political science; Law; Power (physics); Politics; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.015314088733205698,"score_gpt":0.2936496110069076,"score_spread":0.2783355222737019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1877581437","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14916523,0.03134607,0.015114746,0.33279297,0.0059822365,0.0018553188,0.000065291046,0.00010491528,0.46357322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934519,0.004007317,0.000009409761,0.00017205968,0.00038365924,0.000007785628,4.401575e-7,0.0000020654302,0.0019653805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982746,0.00009948612,0.00018952298,0.000088041714,0.00054704986,0.0008012513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940336,0.00011473197,0.00015948269,0.00006809876,0.00021850294,0.000035848934],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011318035,0.000078416015,0.000092611735,0.000021273692,0.0029892903,0.000051779185,0.0003128269,0.000028778417,0.00003033197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026887137,0.000039245126,0.000103610284,0.00021591857,0.0024601324,0.00017389454,0.000041450774,0.00051095925,0.000011515514],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002371066,0.000027879343,0.00072572724,3.2638286e-7,0.00008191817,6.443503e-7,0.0010861229,0.00004192899,0.0000209768,0.9960285,0.0001820216,0.0017802614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044246408,0.000057190795,0.0025053297,0.000027068887,0.000023553626,0.00004144684,0.007916833,9.166444e-7,0.000047053072,0.9254447,0.06342176,0.00007166618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014684135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019287806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8442866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012027806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012128961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99860764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1881373036","doi":"","title":"R v. NS: What's Fair in a Trial? The Supreme Court of Canada's Divided Decision on the Niqab in the Courtroom","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Supreme Court Decisions","score_opus":0.025247989992996257,"score_gpt":0.2669166410101549,"score_spread":0.24166865101715862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1881373036","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8733551,0.001070351,0.0000067397154,0.0902992,0.0006575637,0.0013690757,0.000008624537,0.000012702297,0.033220656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99499714,0.00030064856,0.0000070682004,0.0040927697,0.00026892987,0.00018603346,9.596179e-7,0.0000043524974,0.00014208902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975772,0.00054664497,0.00034107716,0.00018688563,0.0009887822,0.00035941298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99738,0.0020613074,0.00010793732,0.00027625385,0.00011647502,0.00005802775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020724516,0.00012410169,0.0002125092,0.000030425972,0.00088870706,0.0002196795,0.0007598208,0.00006618444,0.0002748716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012175395,0.00005871057,0.00007340179,0.00046472522,0.00061165733,0.00031092885,0.00008232268,0.0003132343,0.000044571847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005866137,0.00019745351,0.0053985724,0.000003198139,0.000042012405,0.0000113928445,0.006664742,0.00011070246,0.000024591236,0.91874075,0.06409788,0.0041220905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00694233,0.00023543164,0.13967429,0.0005228095,0.00003738581,0.0000014509689,0.13368794,0.000048095728,0.00007677335,0.3469077,0.37140736,0.00045844496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90232474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9823456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5718331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018898479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070376234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6835306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1883379657","doi":"","title":"Constitutions as \"Living Trees\"? Comparative Constitutional Law and Interpretive Metaphors","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Comparative law; Supreme court; Legislature; Opposition (politics); Constitutional law; Adjudication; Public law; International law; Municipal law; Constitutional court; Constitution; Politics","score_opus":0.03571265365967889,"score_gpt":0.2901464939763798,"score_spread":0.2544338403167009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1883379657","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28148353,0.000047322537,0.0008286466,0.000422464,0.0002797463,0.00048405264,0.00051821093,0.00019146057,0.71574455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959263,0.00004512458,0.00009596504,0.0007286165,0.00016833584,0.000009411877,0.000048901893,0.000008598251,0.0029687134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974933,0.00022219244,0.0003155039,0.00067972083,0.00067500735,0.0006142301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980756,0.0006092674,0.00015500678,0.00018925084,0.00052334665,0.000447533],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003256037,0.00035266488,0.00046666525,0.0003885482,0.0034835567,0.0012773699,0.0007482088,0.00016696843,0.0007287518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051404303,0.00038793165,0.00020217619,0.0010730239,0.006252836,0.004941837,0.0009542483,0.0003303434,0.0017790276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011466889,0.00012784183,0.054082733,0.0000042168244,0.00015091272,0.000080721176,0.0009990885,0.00008207683,0.000069977046,0.943367,0.0008063363,0.00011442816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039545304,0.00006934826,0.038118258,0.0002245632,0.00013187328,0.000018064016,0.0028444058,0.0000036191118,0.00017056432,0.014888967,0.94247717,0.00065770926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048844386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01723066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94167084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00084277516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005711739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1887905165","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1091","title":"Political Litigation and the Role of the Court","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitutionality; Appeal; Politics; Law; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Legislation; Political question; Government (linguistics); Law of the case; Judicial review; Court of record; Law and economics; Original jurisdiction; Sociology","score_opus":0.016121078018414343,"score_gpt":0.2795073531652398,"score_spread":0.26338627514682544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1887905165","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022670322,0.19034608,0.000008441457,0.081919,0.00013171659,0.00054712204,0.000011857492,0.000017623517,0.7247511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913156,0.0066784723,0.000009974428,0.0016785461,0.00020087718,0.000016687642,0.0000010005023,0.0000017454264,0.00009711299],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912816,0.00019475893,0.00016704631,0.000075894495,0.00028635975,0.00014775989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957985,0.00013832665,0.00005452475,0.0000888541,0.00011213249,0.000026329195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062401785,0.000051195766,0.0001576585,0.0000031704392,0.0005502857,0.000015176297,0.00013373407,0.000023232027,0.000038280785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015395097,0.000026135005,0.000078051096,0.00010455199,0.002128532,0.00004783812,0.00004627831,0.000055877503,0.000008109673],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014253386,0.0000075107264,0.0011928148,0.000027357924,0.000006015037,6.520814e-8,0.000050276572,5.6366463e-8,0.000003209975,0.9975329,0.00072257157,0.0004558002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006936552,0.000002197086,0.0017522762,0.000300691,0.000046360467,6.200243e-7,0.00012384547,0.0000012241388,0.000017634238,0.40814167,0.5895132,0.00003092305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016344067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036378822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98904854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022864491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008142709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9902062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W189285409","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.894327","title":"Social Rights in Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.007075265438936638,"score_gpt":0.24103286789818573,"score_spread":0.2339576024592491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W189285409","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7739229,0.0019381505,0.000075077,0.008745049,0.0003346809,0.00007369995,0.0000019046546,0.000011806112,0.21489672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979661,0.0001965458,0.0000025101251,0.000066284905,0.0009986026,0.0000017273177,6.665023e-7,0.0000016275309,0.0007659438],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980629,0.00006832247,0.00013833608,0.00007221512,0.00032443905,0.0013337972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999839,0.000024325826,0.000048411355,0.000016917518,0.00004489109,0.000026425307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005659117,0.000054943903,0.0000909786,0.000032667816,0.0011305803,0.000020629497,0.00012685153,0.000026905378,0.000027890892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000144935475,0.00004896524,0.000034429973,0.0001785524,0.00011039008,0.000080302205,0.000009918572,0.0005200686,0.000007850249],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004750995,0.000010847077,0.015396642,1.2431506e-7,0.000009839202,0.000006572633,0.00010888221,0.000005879173,0.000001998646,0.9825556,0.00083652517,0.0010623126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015643449,0.0000069208436,0.013774804,0.0000026064854,0.0000042302418,0.0000069000785,0.0030701114,6.753503e-7,0.0000019749787,0.91204,0.07086183,0.00007353471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99848217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22404318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046910504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017908756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1893164503","doi":"","title":"The Theory and Doctrine of Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendment in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Doctrine; Supreme court; Constitutional amendment; Political science; Constitutional law; Constitutional economics; Constitutional theory; Substantive due process; Politics; Originalism","score_opus":0.027957670682635292,"score_gpt":0.27644448429230295,"score_spread":0.24848681360966765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1893164503","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15278786,0.0030068012,0.0005093738,0.00888116,0.00067464076,0.00023562698,0.000025975349,0.000012401368,0.8338662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993498,0.00018032592,0.000033255186,0.00017041506,0.00004980064,0.0000076272095,9.123228e-7,4.018183e-7,0.0002074774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919915,0.00009910896,0.00014148433,0.000073484734,0.00035094563,0.00013584094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937505,0.00038193166,0.00003203997,0.000033508568,0.000105729036,0.000071735354],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091209984,0.000043653246,0.00007680479,0.000016355136,0.00035473236,0.000009804996,0.00007674536,0.000013451256,0.000035802357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036174894,0.00002874686,0.000010998754,0.00011812899,0.0031846662,0.00005111137,0.000039253966,0.000044005425,0.0000020157936],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024727688,0.000007897444,0.037703846,4.0553078e-7,0.000009493087,0.0000023648745,0.00015936777,0.000031020983,0.0000020402347,0.96049017,0.0008212312,0.0007474401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066122325,0.000018462108,0.017896779,0.000020995523,0.000010120976,0.000004788726,0.025551787,0.000007499806,0.000049062444,0.62259966,0.33303928,0.00014033484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9328175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98824215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8465619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036329255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075214594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1893729068","doi":"","title":"Judicial Independence in Context","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial independence; Independence (probability theory); Law; Judicial activism; Context (archaeology); Political science; Judicial review; Judicial discretion; Judicial opinion; Supreme court; History","score_opus":0.010977170621309023,"score_gpt":0.2806175236896603,"score_spread":0.26964035306835127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1893729068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9028063,0.0015093847,0.00027741617,0.0056872196,0.0012075396,0.00011435331,9.818632e-7,0.000028620087,0.08836818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99649876,0.0018467936,0.000010435465,0.00020852101,0.0010169349,0.0000036864244,2.1682403e-7,0.0000036506456,0.0004109891],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977626,0.00007354323,0.00016982002,0.00011479213,0.00041011523,0.0014690824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996586,0.000056473662,0.000066634886,0.000046483674,0.000101584774,0.0000702112],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023529392,0.00007222551,0.000116416115,0.00007676846,0.0007607371,0.00004455102,0.0002591466,0.00009944116,0.00010780635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003553992,0.00006659301,0.00005453458,0.00022664593,0.0003973096,0.00019641526,0.000026735228,0.002362125,0.00007091296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014386719,0.00002644269,0.017609637,1.468575e-7,0.000013658781,0.0000048430443,0.0010874338,6.006387e-7,0.000107828586,0.9524698,0.00003572667,0.02862947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029487128,0.00003905515,0.0070261424,0.000007337026,0.000005954605,0.000035790825,0.014242516,0.0000011359066,0.000012119553,0.951842,0.026384404,0.00010865523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016675867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6930117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6763358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038477383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004958175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1893794509","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2011.00867.x","title":"Deference on Questions of Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Presumption; Law; Judicial deference; Political science; Delegate; Competence (human resources); Legislature; Standard of review; Statutory interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Judicial review; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16117987959311303,"score_gpt":0.3499320435283463,"score_spread":0.18875216393523325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1893794509","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00041834495,0.03873227,0.000193902,0.000695756,0.00007427632,0.00015737055,0.0000064207097,0.000027808846,0.95969385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97274226,0.025057375,0.00012680837,0.0019262341,0.000034249842,0.000018755254,6.739809e-7,0.0000018654865,0.000091757625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943244,0.000071904156,0.00012954485,0.00009160402,0.00017057845,0.00010395162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997158,0.000030472436,0.00004686213,0.000088933455,0.00008014575,0.000037807244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021019907,0.000049936996,0.00015389352,0.0000052760383,0.0003111861,0.0000036976696,0.00012150609,0.000022262146,0.0001818316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000520557,0.000039958086,0.000058470057,0.0000664391,0.000583083,0.00005497566,0.000021424357,0.00004326832,0.00010701681],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011507211,0.00003200764,0.000044287113,0.000041857606,0.000006507913,5.612194e-7,0.0005111376,9.069863e-8,0.0000016226745,0.9955788,0.00009543794,0.003686512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031597538,0.000026746531,0.00031036156,0.0016154395,0.00004083512,2.8936762e-7,0.000016570964,6.612895e-7,0.000022659517,0.5310187,0.46683133,0.00008484415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025583705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009735577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97232395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016784436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004646009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.980905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1896563657","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12157","title":"<i>Comparative Matters: The Renaissance of Comparative Constitutional Law</i> . By Ran Hirschl. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. 320 pp. $45.00 cloth.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"The Renaissance; Citation; Constitutional law; Law; Sociology; Classics; Art history; History; Political science","score_opus":0.06757439367169296,"score_gpt":0.31484427646528285,"score_spread":0.24726988279358988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1896563657","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022359133,0.49962986,0.00016924251,0.013261465,0.00028517554,0.0010053598,0.00031474888,0.000067574096,0.485043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20883761,0.7754441,0.00050931756,0.013961878,0.00030232748,0.000041950676,0.00006761079,0.000007382393,0.0008278064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980055,0.0004245723,0.00034060617,0.00029885684,0.0006077173,0.0003227674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868006,0.00024549212,0.00030392155,0.00019771997,0.00041830595,0.0001544996],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000833811,0.00021276569,0.00065918796,0.0000010399427,0.0014072276,0.00003469461,0.00049915863,0.00008505412,0.00008458603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023412053,0.00015982288,0.00033845723,0.00027464112,0.009582972,0.00037355843,0.0001410537,0.00023666331,0.000029371267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010329692,0.00003966851,0.00007639923,0.00004264253,0.000094297255,4.409033e-7,0.0009929554,0.000004762069,0.0000030402928,0.5430221,0.4556991,0.00001427425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003479062,0.000026668975,0.000020103711,0.00052228995,0.00012623037,0.0000013427672,0.004481842,0.000004297216,0.000030970383,0.0041861464,0.9900588,0.00019341309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048717265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011438198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53883594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021014054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041595395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W189890627","doi":"10.21991/c9nq2v","title":"GUN CONTROL AND JUDICIAL ANARCHY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gun control; Control (management); Political science; Law; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.03405555251579101,"score_gpt":0.2670749701080727,"score_spread":0.23301941759228167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W189890627","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011009276,0.003851433,0.057981003,0.012206421,0.0033454874,0.0012292302,0.0004131154,0.00053639174,0.90942764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99529976,0.00042913028,0.0008962108,0.0025509098,0.0004687544,0.000108730426,0.000027417691,0.000009326222,0.0002097883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968776,0.00016331054,0.00056875707,0.00061308814,0.0007310646,0.0010461595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984198,0.00021910509,0.00018016607,0.00022906912,0.00047585202,0.00047598363],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006414157,0.0003659385,0.00045471484,0.00026333446,0.0050165593,0.00009998492,0.0003846842,0.0002631352,0.00070856087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007281982,0.00036567892,0.00021043855,0.0004840914,0.024164548,0.00081122614,0.0001748999,0.0003179541,0.0003084775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011891688,0.00012318479,0.05156982,0.0000048436455,0.00012888771,0.000044913402,0.0006347517,0.000007618211,0.000035666675,0.9421395,0.0032475663,0.0019443153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026964936,0.00013609747,0.012073634,0.00014201377,0.00019359076,0.00015007911,0.009368284,0.000062737054,0.000052002364,0.46161878,0.512534,0.0009722957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005400078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004570568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9842905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022806108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021048188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1899518710","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1209","title":"The Patriation and Quebec Veto References: The Supreme Court Wrestles with the Political Part of the Constitution","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Supreme court; Veto; Parliament; Political science; Convention; Constitutional court; Politics","score_opus":0.07659455001087731,"score_gpt":0.29898326633194566,"score_spread":0.22238871632106835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1899518710","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019931788,0.20673855,0.00016120181,0.32920825,0.0014270865,0.0045773797,0.0001033406,0.000110597575,0.43774182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97426665,0.023344481,0.000010150015,0.0019324226,0.00020721977,0.000070260925,0.0000018984572,0.0000034881882,0.00016342061],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806243,0.0006009295,0.0002935425,0.00017001292,0.0005678211,0.00030524365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986802,0.0004857773,0.00017833892,0.00029355378,0.00030331998,0.00005886056],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014656056,0.00013210668,0.00022433129,0.000005883568,0.0024699504,0.000059382914,0.00047014697,0.000049959133,0.000063129715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037140728,0.000046967907,0.00009376835,0.00021724199,0.0057140714,0.00012737342,0.000098392884,0.00016741267,0.000012836164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011515674,0.000014387861,0.002180091,0.000035135712,0.000041717336,3.300075e-7,0.0005848682,1.4208803e-7,0.0000016115074,0.9934429,0.0026184793,0.0010688406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010942852,0.000034995734,0.006465897,0.0008689638,0.00025188396,0.0000035907958,0.002675156,0.0000011965848,0.000019326264,0.028436389,0.96101916,0.00011400922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.073214605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2682994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9650065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059957863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004947318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1903199879","doi":"","title":"L’Influence Du Contexte Économique Et Idéologique Sur La Conception De L’Être Humain Par Le Droit Et Le Juge Constitutionnels: Les Cas Canadien, Indien Et Sud-Africain (The Influence of Economic and Ideological Context on the Development of the Human Being by the Law and the Constitutional Judge: The Case of Canada, India and South Africa)","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Constitution; Humanities; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Ethnology; Social rights; Sociology; Law; Human rights; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015640264736901877,"score_gpt":0.22146007782159938,"score_spread":0.2058198130846975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1903199879","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97497565,0.003765791,0.00013104679,0.016519317,0.000051012663,0.00048264975,0.000088017114,0.0000036416052,0.0039828788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997976,0.0008755636,0.0000068877976,0.0010304098,0.00003194506,0.00003899994,9.801756e-7,0.000004651328,0.000034561403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960776,0.0022780097,0.00057446456,0.00022089008,0.00016279037,0.00068626006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99631965,0.002619757,0.00067305035,0.00014493093,0.0001715819,0.000071039525],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008914547,0.00021659797,0.0003382324,0.000022440167,0.0040446636,0.00005529901,0.0004724832,0.00013146039,0.0000065048384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006605771,0.00010236505,0.000076089025,0.000115579416,0.028342117,0.00018451411,0.00017480337,0.0011611396,2.1415867e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056328307,0.000031808264,0.013751224,0.0000048090374,0.00022405319,0.000007485339,0.028453944,0.00037712397,0.000032416898,0.9567693,0.000028715707,0.00026278847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018848244,0.00022631523,0.09264496,0.00021897414,0.00018586346,0.0014838541,0.13180347,0.000047462985,0.00024983138,0.768443,0.002474577,0.00033686476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6575637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9654625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3078988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057025085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012645118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972519},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1903413972","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1107","title":"The Legitimacy of the Juridical: Constituent Power, Democracy, and the Limits of Constitutional Reform","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Constitution; Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Law and economics; Power (physics); Subject (documents); Law; Separation of powers; Constitutional economics; Sociology; Politics; Computer science; Physics","score_opus":0.017036571260529678,"score_gpt":0.2834947803804395,"score_spread":0.26645820911990986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1903413972","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014611411,0.0014957646,0.000077435,0.042982604,0.0014108792,0.00022781748,0.00001808483,0.000008981434,0.939167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982119,0.0009851141,0.00007635934,0.0003764392,0.0002625656,0.000004621507,2.2219581e-7,0.0000024397316,0.00008032682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844027,0.00018044336,0.0003736666,0.000096317366,0.0006718438,0.00023745114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985476,0.0005495849,0.000320562,0.00014197259,0.00034696536,0.00009328613],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016594011,0.00009714381,0.0001900527,0.000014080196,0.005680836,0.000085680724,0.0004882873,0.00006710651,0.000058098067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005841019,0.000041619223,0.00016094162,0.00012199984,0.026444897,0.00013880049,0.00012017761,0.0005030937,0.000003372611],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056687008,0.00003235122,0.0011337614,0.0000015474461,0.000061943756,0.0000018415661,0.00038036786,0.0000018757912,0.00015601826,0.9972,0.0002697933,0.000703791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010724934,0.00002638428,0.0038692835,0.00007143828,0.0000758476,0.00016490743,0.0019190394,0.00000506813,0.00038884784,0.8634154,0.12888294,0.000108337146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018707551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10038784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9836005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004062845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006968827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99561363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1904988749","doi":"10.21991/c9g38c","title":"A Principled Approach to the Positive/Negative Rights Debate in Canadian Constitutional Adjudication","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; State (computer science); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Algorithm","score_opus":0.01772730111569473,"score_gpt":0.2619739155655011,"score_spread":0.24424661444980636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1904988749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005820327,0.00051183015,0.079818994,0.042746264,0.0021925443,0.002469287,0.0006794841,0.00020978,0.8655515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920315,0.000051907762,0.0010509826,0.005394612,0.00046055292,0.00051172136,0.00023567703,0.000008431345,0.00025461527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951033,0.00045480495,0.00079211703,0.0008773697,0.0011014902,0.0016709045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971031,0.00061853806,0.00020585192,0.0003974886,0.0007693952,0.0009056035],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001767371,0.0004674058,0.00053198164,0.00077318784,0.007590228,0.00021677685,0.00084340025,0.00030313653,0.00016209146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023790516,0.00039465717,0.00023704181,0.0019760146,0.018389171,0.00070225593,0.0001968546,0.00050417247,0.0006425739],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056870118,0.00015387005,0.013080008,0.0000035512664,0.00010637256,0.000010355306,0.0008186255,0.0039452217,0.000012085046,0.9780255,0.0031286967,0.0006588592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001277784,0.00005156168,0.015260208,0.00020631705,0.00009664867,0.00007314516,0.002494044,0.0019281486,0.000031142652,0.11839492,0.85934895,0.000837136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2620564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6574359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9862112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018948526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007512432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1915046536","doi":"","title":"The Declining Influence of the United States Constitution","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Constitutionalism; Political science; Mainstream; Law; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.03870910728818699,"score_gpt":0.3228733625618576,"score_spread":0.2841642552736706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1915046536","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88681334,0.00032504223,0.000065736036,0.0031288683,0.00026033117,0.00007904547,0.0000015128304,0.000017786619,0.10930831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990584,0.0002995339,0.000016147245,0.00038534915,0.00007447529,0.0000035623978,3.8844087e-7,4.9209547e-7,0.00016160766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945235,0.00007966731,0.00009755589,0.00003228461,0.00018821677,0.00014992506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994233,0.0003337446,0.000049488932,0.00005202206,0.000114707065,0.000026688713],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052442926,0.000029941848,0.0000390747,0.000009434678,0.0015806747,0.000013507836,0.00013413143,0.000018578528,0.000013469609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053281244,0.000014125132,0.000025056643,0.0002703173,0.001966695,0.000096659525,0.00004513837,0.00004266654,0.000012786302],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018627449,0.0000063653974,0.117818214,2.9963942e-7,0.0000071507047,1.6158317e-8,0.0017606935,0.00012673101,0.000012414945,0.87970775,0.00023820465,0.0003202757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007864455,0.0000064565847,0.2324411,0.000023289605,0.000017575521,3.6452366e-7,0.016659629,0.000011999971,0.00022320205,0.03166166,0.71880347,0.00007264371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018365249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003008331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8480461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002043626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010195581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1921496057","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2733","title":"Who Writes? Gender and Judgment Assignment on the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Gender gap; Psychology; Demographic economics; Economics","score_opus":0.03413679573157492,"score_gpt":0.2494576433647676,"score_spread":0.2153208476331927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1921496057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008396975,0.0003091489,0.00018037543,0.0138584385,0.00027549342,0.00007753619,0.000005565818,0.0000042883676,0.9768922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99793744,0.00017042835,0.000029813178,0.0013986916,0.00029334394,0.0000023853909,1.8437291e-7,0.0000025665627,0.00016512426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880505,0.00014671312,0.00015120629,0.00008073837,0.00061048457,0.00020581819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948037,0.00017791113,0.00009185935,0.000056454508,0.0000873864,0.00010601427],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008022285,0.00006814443,0.00011652407,0.0000095474625,0.0015376393,0.000047191978,0.00013328814,0.000025680447,0.00015290051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000079517835,0.0000436125,0.000032583688,0.00003943186,0.00033871815,0.000045454246,0.0000314023,0.000135571,0.00000204011],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006619952,0.000018225728,0.0014596699,0.0000013161332,0.000036167523,0.000002280279,0.00041795458,0.000027384083,0.000018197865,0.99082595,0.0067803175,0.00040592658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005678961,0.00016199483,0.028281037,0.0001378677,0.00006708236,0.000018796401,0.007388557,0.00005904476,0.00030962797,0.5815885,0.3811291,0.00029052555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72386515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9376913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9895405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012538981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024188212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1922063759","doi":"10.24926/26390742.1599","title":"Proportionality and Pretense","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional commentary","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Judicial review; Law and economics; Political science; Scope (computer science); Human rights; Law; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.0482812790387966,"score_gpt":0.3224097474795693,"score_spread":0.2741284684407727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1922063759","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30475664,0.01020537,0.0017365345,0.106753886,0.00232439,0.00078437146,0.00016954355,0.0002453351,0.5730239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99304307,0.00015575696,0.0003189938,0.005672491,0.0006960271,0.000022147322,0.000023758852,0.0000013616988,0.00006641554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915135,0.000084971834,0.0001259185,0.00010306307,0.00028552744,0.00024914212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995782,0.0001052683,0.000034491426,0.000049537004,0.00006885314,0.00016365132],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048572797,0.000072309005,0.00008570424,0.000026356543,0.0012917505,0.00001914136,0.00006173101,0.000036878944,0.0002874724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001083562,0.00006823559,0.000032834218,0.00008455491,0.0040382217,0.0003311711,0.00006742475,0.00007780716,0.000039791656],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007899277,0.00005354152,0.19321588,0.0000016214193,0.000020897009,0.0000010602478,0.00036139603,2.7649514e-7,0.000009634717,0.7941705,0.011527477,0.0006298418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017964342,0.000008596584,0.08466311,0.000013755049,0.00002475955,0.000011016178,0.0009589006,8.535798e-7,0.000017278153,0.03394352,0.8800383,0.00014022698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013218145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013568543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86851084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009798382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001510773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1924136381","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004860","title":"Proportionality, Balancing, and the Cult of Constitutional Rights Scholarship","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Cult; Scholarship; Vocabulary; Politics; Constitutional law; Law; German; Political science; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.019803944092618545,"score_gpt":0.29651002073596644,"score_spread":0.2767060766433479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1924136381","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78762305,0.0026645653,0.00015748563,0.015333455,0.0017871405,0.00026581503,0.000042925174,0.00000754745,0.192118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99897164,0.00004727614,0.00018981677,0.0003313962,0.0003922432,0.0000018170381,4.114692e-7,0.0000013395038,0.00006406091],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886143,0.000103714716,0.00031332576,0.000082888546,0.00044167793,0.00019697637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856144,0.00017519284,0.00024202498,0.00006822471,0.0006303749,0.0003227403],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016399829,0.00006950554,0.00017586883,0.000047277194,0.001344723,0.00006976238,0.0002971394,0.00006639138,0.00016343924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063388684,0.00004579992,0.00007619955,0.00012538837,0.01220771,0.00028551495,0.000015728303,0.00034454395,0.0000050008775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012106514,0.000006287857,0.023781303,0.0000024479634,0.000023547831,0.000021084476,0.0008168054,0.0000019754305,0.000043506585,0.9749591,0.00023129694,0.00010054828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006004231,0.000026798321,0.042809747,0.00011707616,0.00005474118,0.00014468496,0.00029595045,0.0000012347821,0.00014301573,0.58704424,0.36863244,0.00012967618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.088909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5227198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4338108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005024065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029713018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1927553831","doi":"","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada in the 21st Century","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Charter; Legitimacy; Institution; Legislature; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.02114937332904549,"score_gpt":0.25661073366255693,"score_spread":0.23546136033351145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1927553831","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038184155,0.0006814644,0.0000010710604,0.03223751,0.00017460188,0.00006703499,0.0000013687682,0.0000032642554,0.92864954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99722844,0.0015938098,0.0000015993714,0.0005182496,0.00007618175,0.0000030394528,1.454281e-7,4.0818756e-7,0.0005781499],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946064,0.00004962152,0.00006618827,0.000034543962,0.00026377055,0.00012521757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99972224,0.00017641702,0.000014850747,0.000038895894,0.000034718756,0.000012867809],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033631708,0.000022382359,0.00003568744,0.000003872914,0.00059013447,0.000009918193,0.00016033743,0.000009578653,0.000058164504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008712295,0.000010637797,0.000012490622,0.00013866306,0.00028445467,0.000019342231,0.000013320628,0.00003255111,0.0000017010578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025055674,0.000008053075,0.013375928,1.6128745e-7,0.0000038877342,0.0000016615671,0.0013544187,0.0000014665,0.0000012366525,0.97384393,0.009663823,0.0017429054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029825009,0.0000025732736,0.03391682,0.0000020127281,0.0000014214984,2.416869e-7,0.051791005,6.294038e-7,0.000001961865,0.0073060268,0.9069261,0.000021379366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.954591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96653795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004148259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041714284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4538897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1932181148","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01714.x","title":"Abortion Law Reforms in Colombia and Nicaragua: Issue Networks and Opportunity Contexts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Development and Change","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"ASTER","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Legislature; Latin Americans; Abortion law; Politics; Unitary state; Political science; State (computer science); Law; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Development economics; Family planning; Economics; Population; Research methodology","score_opus":0.10343690055498943,"score_gpt":0.28840716961645285,"score_spread":0.1849702690614634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1932181148","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9381814,0.0026253304,0.000006888681,0.00069123047,0.00013615232,0.00021017926,0.0000018154418,0.000020800782,0.058126178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966749,0.0024244455,0.000051355608,0.0005652643,0.00007816351,0.000034064495,0.0000035813746,0.0000017356297,0.00016650125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953413,0.000021293796,0.0001012008,0.00011341531,0.00008187732,0.0001480702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99982345,0.000012921182,0.000030006053,0.000020948966,0.000026308944,0.00008637288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026808926,0.000060580354,0.00010061371,0.000021665372,0.00043086082,0.000017621496,0.000028728147,0.000057726742,0.000030383118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009842834,0.00005098559,0.000005056631,0.00006784127,0.00033337617,0.00013514275,0.000052422794,0.00004945385,0.000001424382],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076151955,0.00009691912,0.23993863,0.000020130488,0.0000475616,0.000033100565,0.15288858,2.7506779e-8,0.000003516656,0.33624333,0.00067550555,0.26997653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025807784,0.000024555331,0.8472447,0.00004112101,0.0000061465125,0.0000010986613,0.0053502154,0.0000024286724,0.000013230429,0.0028725392,0.14404406,0.00014185974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009977013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.067750335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60730606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002493335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035358415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99661565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1933262150","doi":"","title":"New Models of Constitutional Review","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Legislature; Parliamentary sovereignty; Law; Judicial review; Constitution; Declaration; Commonwealth; Bill of rights; State (computer science); Enumerated powers; Legislation; Separation of powers; Politics","score_opus":0.02190690712874527,"score_gpt":0.2899303972521911,"score_spread":0.26802349012344584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1933262150","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00085817167,0.14895324,0.32611707,0.01621256,0.0005378059,0.00021268598,0.0000028948905,0.000039136277,0.5070664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8754022,0.12249781,0.00017401662,0.00041632183,0.00058342016,0.0000014319055,7.0868373e-7,0.00000205367,0.0009220122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838555,0.0001062355,0.00021410141,0.00008374519,0.0003985821,0.00081176864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995292,0.000058199603,0.000121088895,0.000049268823,0.00015844968,0.000083835635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019559031,0.000065368215,0.00017316297,0.000032243748,0.0005028597,0.000010731401,0.00019123795,0.000034104218,0.00009657357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023643122,0.000055523884,0.000102843245,0.00016078496,0.0005851116,0.00016360887,0.000019184974,0.000402442,0.000024209097],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042973834,0.000010017483,0.00014131838,0.000004636876,0.000039225943,1.5272498e-7,0.000073065494,0.000021123924,0.0000047808358,0.97936714,0.0011064134,0.019227855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013447883,0.000035964815,0.000028623142,0.0001569167,0.000031203348,0.000019384686,0.0003098843,0.0000055585674,0.0000026138052,0.9120353,0.08717633,0.00006376326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015489525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026364888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8745441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002736524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068117045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99881876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1933635745","doi":"","title":"Xenophon Contiades (ed), Engineering Constitutional Change: A Comparative Perspective on Europe, Canada and the USA","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Current Legal  Issues","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Political science; Regional science; Geography; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05351227577359906,"score_gpt":0.3161960410140116,"score_spread":0.26268376524041254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1933635745","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6116388,0.08039202,0.0004903315,0.041275717,0.007200141,0.001240608,0.000058253758,0.000054185562,0.25765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969136,0.0013495176,0.000025054991,0.00021629919,0.0013605383,0.0000031795091,5.9131395e-7,0.0000036258143,0.00012758057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985907,0.00042142504,0.00024109389,0.000104151404,0.00046434943,0.00017827972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988898,0.00017378438,0.00017515759,0.00004413862,0.00062265614,0.00009445591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005315149,0.000120799916,0.00022959,0.00004427749,0.00049671315,0.0001416564,0.00019563008,0.0000079281235,0.00007693283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032669917,0.000076803735,0.000049993534,0.00013543991,0.0014958661,0.00029544235,0.00004603573,0.0002734236,0.000050733554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059529946,0.00003259092,0.00077243237,0.0000027508534,0.000081743776,0.000036766614,0.008421326,0.00003566888,0.00001594355,0.9795015,0.0103637725,0.00067600183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000921481,0.00010922206,0.032255143,0.00021612924,0.000041815678,0.000019591193,0.005041646,0.00001837055,0.000027343804,0.0006047324,0.9605582,0.00018633719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21860154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054662354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97889674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010487655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031164594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9625876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1941960932","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781316178560","title":"Constitutional Conventions in Westminster Systems","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; Legislature; Government (linguistics); Political science; Constitutionalism; Separation of powers; Politics; Constitutional law; Law; Parliamentary sovereignty; Power (physics); Corporate governance; Basic law; Law and economics; Democracy; Constitution; Public administration; Sociology; Sovereignty; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.04937109953748621,"score_gpt":0.2504936465690152,"score_spread":0.201122547031529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1941960932","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004089799,0.0008312924,0.000106177555,0.00006167799,0.0010999101,0.00048829423,0.00038368657,0.00008297332,0.9969051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01003958,0.00013921969,0.0000071113823,0.00004139286,0.00044156596,0.0000033980173,0.0000690033,0.0000054487473,0.9892533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985048,0.00016390435,0.00019290578,0.00031446439,0.0005148027,0.00030913326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990883,0.00008963021,0.00013802465,0.00014715795,0.0003551042,0.00018180588],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003174538,0.00019559193,0.00034192926,0.0001236257,0.00061028794,0.00005800355,0.00035050258,0.0003200336,0.000004890397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046809986,0.00023675051,0.00012487649,0.00003213293,0.0036061057,0.00012102285,0.00017763647,0.00032157823,0.00005482355],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017127877,0.000014644537,0.00003454747,0.000014502546,0.000051172217,0.00013923604,0.00015790071,0.0000066411817,2.2684853e-7,0.82500046,0.1745111,0.000052429474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004223092,0.000013109287,0.000023569135,0.00024118368,0.00007426833,0.0000039683073,0.0007760147,0.00000410182,2.750476e-7,0.00015158343,0.9980299,0.0002597487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00884723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052975083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8248489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012950859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027935319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1942658000","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2008.00039.x","title":"Canada's Trial Courts: Two Tiers or One? <i>Edited by</i> PETER H. RUSSELL","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Politics; Library science; Sociology; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.044145286240999046,"score_gpt":0.2731947626808374,"score_spread":0.22904947643983836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1942658000","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1928808,0.00033359282,0.00014729399,0.3135947,0.004342175,0.0015817906,0.0010927271,0.00016213494,0.4858648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913082,0.0000596731,0.000027356722,0.0035238434,0.0010713016,0.000039488357,0.00014880033,0.0000066937237,0.003814647],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984746,0.000086135544,0.00022561917,0.00021616965,0.00050576293,0.0004917425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879247,0.00007527467,0.00007818841,0.00009888705,0.00019601114,0.0007591694],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021982242,0.00011547793,0.00014556783,0.00007293591,0.001835875,0.00010286727,0.0001904411,0.00008514337,0.0005052238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042654361,0.00011563967,0.000037436643,0.0003134931,0.0004788349,0.0002608397,0.000007641904,0.000115314084,0.000022693417],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042249143,0.000054791653,0.0006593208,0.000001931266,0.000051339644,0.000116207804,0.0003349316,1.5749076e-7,0.0000060433754,0.18336967,0.8139592,0.001023918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018535894,0.00008013868,0.00025604316,0.0000036956433,0.000010740069,0.000006104321,0.00041752998,0.0000024868632,0.000010956616,0.00035773774,0.9968315,0.00016950864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9739046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7984274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009179928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044422437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1943095161","doi":"","title":"Law-Based Administration: The Key to Building a Rule of Law Government","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administration (probate law); Rule of law; Government (linguistics); Democracy; Public law; Political science; Law; Political law; Key (lock); Administrative law; Point (geometry); Municipal law; Law and economics; Chinese law; Sociology; Politics; Computer science; Mathematics; Computer security","score_opus":0.04927142240458667,"score_gpt":0.3107900135397665,"score_spread":0.26151859113517983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1943095161","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03865069,0.000034936824,0.000045451885,0.016854294,0.00032145044,0.000160939,0.000034447356,0.00001142798,0.94388634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957512,6.966315e-7,0.00013324039,0.0037513375,0.00027331142,0.00001242365,2.589785e-7,0.0000016026916,0.000075917706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850124,0.000041876414,0.00010184737,0.00014042595,0.0008848602,0.00032975568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922603,0.000038581446,0.00004008039,0.00006550026,0.00019454779,0.00043525713],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009896648,0.000051958174,0.00007773791,0.00001709294,0.0024509963,0.00008886854,0.0004105651,0.000029140248,0.000022486814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024686573,0.000043502856,0.000030388735,0.000556982,0.0030903744,0.00014861114,0.000030501778,0.00004627717,0.000015938052],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028493814,0.000005230339,0.00058111065,3.7390902e-7,0.0000016541179,0.0000016529273,0.004952456,0.0000025837944,0.000057123783,0.99354064,0.00048236098,0.00037194215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009865186,0.0000425214,0.0013753168,0.0000108606255,0.000007963109,2.4444947e-7,0.016411372,0.000004394857,0.00049264496,0.016021276,0.96540195,0.00013280277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35964623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6772932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9775194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008887833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034308482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1947709505","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1264","title":"Dissents and Concurrences: Seven Debates in Charter Jurisprudence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Supreme court; Dissent; Dissenting opinion; Sociology","score_opus":0.03247950035206516,"score_gpt":0.32322906412091046,"score_spread":0.2907495637688453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1947709505","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10461949,0.61455345,0.000030978546,0.06029251,0.00085345877,0.0029056412,0.000023183893,0.00013386877,0.21658744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89193285,0.10613568,0.000020859228,0.0016076479,0.00007765033,0.000087584405,0.0000020434413,0.000002481071,0.00013322463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990477,0.000103171864,0.00020083548,0.00017722118,0.00023924507,0.00023180715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962527,0.00008123326,0.000046659985,0.0000729775,0.00009173017,0.000082122424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003426066,0.00009174879,0.0002338671,0.000012496467,0.00028481786,0.000045902205,0.00015304936,0.000032926546,0.00050511444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000112685826,0.00007211632,0.000036674806,0.00015453891,0.0006014698,0.00028252174,0.00005196342,0.00007440495,0.00024876036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022840593,0.000082899765,0.04209313,0.0005347942,0.000036611294,0.000009136789,0.0026809599,1.5353972e-7,0.000026564816,0.9092953,0.0133376485,0.031900473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013818621,0.000019497098,0.022752687,0.003942681,0.000032791206,0.0000020124417,0.0005472062,0.000003876706,0.000004711897,0.031134088,0.9411582,0.00026411033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014883095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007927787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9278205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027216689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000062614665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99167687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1953784351","doi":"","title":"Subconsitutional Constitutional Law: Supplement, Sham, or Substitute?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legislature; Supreme court; Judicial review; Political science; Judicial restraint; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Politics; Judicial activism; Sociology","score_opus":0.06626359908998686,"score_gpt":0.30370589106186485,"score_spread":0.237442291971878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1953784351","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26985982,0.000035256275,0.0018073589,0.005000377,0.0011756769,0.0011122869,0.0016631996,0.0005442196,0.7188018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98424727,0.00015301783,0.00016767901,0.002302923,0.00055431563,0.000013283249,0.00028749538,0.000016820184,0.012257193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961572,0.00016780477,0.0004251615,0.00087053765,0.0013167436,0.0010625267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976305,0.00031326318,0.0001704381,0.00033030257,0.00071005174,0.0008454726],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048904715,0.000438827,0.0004631827,0.0004701936,0.004217223,0.0014618414,0.0015547043,0.00023828841,0.007658035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006115818,0.00045294987,0.00030450875,0.0017777821,0.0034581358,0.008708003,0.0011347978,0.00038963094,0.0070191706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00066093105,0.00020360919,0.10384165,0.0000072541934,0.00016471116,0.00061774295,0.00022340202,0.000055956214,0.00003089863,0.8870159,0.006750576,0.00042735998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009603631,0.00006023944,0.017406052,0.00006968621,0.00007036696,0.000041971376,0.00049594016,0.0000013748709,0.000091710834,0.0058579943,0.97430015,0.0006441752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015943655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013811982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96754956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014041654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013391861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1957592722","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-28299-7_14","title":"Judicial Independence in Canada: A Critical Overview","year":2012,"lang":"de","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Independence (probability theory); Judicial independence; Politics; Political science; Law; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07767666892778896,"score_gpt":0.3319626028589598,"score_spread":0.2542859339311708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1957592722","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016197776,0.29418078,0.0002235927,0.011821834,0.015010375,0.0032677343,0.0012530938,0.00028081934,0.672342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8993448,0.07148614,0.0006391743,0.0030232784,0.008509809,0.00027088946,0.0003420604,0.00032815163,0.016055688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868917,0.0007790444,0.0025139926,0.00216415,0.0043150056,0.0033361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941087,0.0017702582,0.00094488764,0.0010407205,0.00065253704,0.0014828929],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002749892,0.0019472262,0.0027467364,0.00056375,0.0019589525,0.00027513085,0.0020439897,0.0020975794,0.006319806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014653753,0.0020436414,0.00079667725,0.00088220637,0.002746394,0.0008549219,0.001316646,0.0038717291,0.002792304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021267956,0.00037263235,0.013350018,0.00024114364,0.001037005,0.00046084507,0.0023125804,0.000003083174,0.000026000376,0.9488004,0.0058522434,0.027331412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012114855,0.00015353331,0.016210435,0.0026692268,0.0024020888,0.00003221363,0.0021068137,0.000024817007,0.000043202377,0.08844887,0.8831062,0.0035911275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9587374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97834283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89772505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060976767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013928155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1958936762","doi":"10.21991/c98374","title":"The Constitutionality of Prorogation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Parliament; Prime minister; Context (archaeology); Political science; Meaning (existential); Law; Governor; Constitutional law; Original meaning; Law and economics; Constitution; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; History; Engineering; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05385636001912841,"score_gpt":0.28924830508521077,"score_spread":0.23539194506608235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1958936762","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006193529,0.0030624827,0.038593188,0.007367187,0.0040311203,0.0013648305,0.00028146434,0.00030873655,0.9387975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99751973,0.0004772128,0.0009345349,0.00037877547,0.0002130987,0.00014563915,0.000028792121,0.0000061992887,0.00029602816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99660814,0.00022733006,0.0008645279,0.00043863803,0.0010269695,0.00083438685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99725085,0.00057193846,0.0004032052,0.00035537133,0.001168609,0.00024999236],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001244912,0.000297754,0.00035445465,0.00014748194,0.00698735,0.00007193218,0.0006532688,0.0002145963,0.00040221738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020688465,0.00023948909,0.00030902022,0.00067383714,0.040750388,0.00071567175,0.0001852147,0.00027568053,0.0001880252],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010811197,0.00015410449,0.03931818,0.0000065999134,0.00012956251,0.000007259498,0.00048538242,0.000021256119,0.000045400207,0.9561124,0.0020963957,0.0015153321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008544857,0.00007812959,0.007340922,0.00018310442,0.000118734686,0.000056105564,0.012147058,0.00003058979,0.00062106166,0.44503874,0.5329576,0.0005734624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032941264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00466245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9913262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029683756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004173255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99430543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965374745","doi":"10.7202/1006417ar","title":"The Place of Legitimacy in Legal Theory","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Legal positivism; Legitimacy; Epistemology; Jurisprudence; Legal formalism; Sociology; Law; Political science; Legal realism; Legal profession; Philosophy; Comparative law; Politics; Black letter law","score_opus":0.04223338448784949,"score_gpt":0.28434318212507254,"score_spread":0.24210979763722304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965374745","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00850112,0.00041440636,0.0000134940465,0.00068210973,0.00031464227,0.000044617616,0.0000032314035,0.0000055209684,0.9900209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99926865,0.00027253962,0.00004503,0.00008609474,0.00012652106,0.0000019188158,3.9991733e-8,0.00000175506,0.00019744356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924093,0.00017310219,0.0001553335,0.000046613946,0.0002117178,0.00017230479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996251,0.00014903242,0.00007172062,0.000037283695,0.00007514049,0.000041719893],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011736952,0.00004028273,0.00007537301,0.000016147207,0.0036189323,0.000017914868,0.000182911,0.000022654142,0.00011411838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013262073,0.000025659067,0.000048751102,0.00009070651,0.0008421831,0.00014915537,0.000028699636,0.00013875288,0.000011638814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003978103,0.000022122056,0.0005604954,3.0716313e-7,0.000012095646,0.0000113178385,0.00083624676,0.0000011127656,0.0000022222764,0.9950257,0.00007142603,0.003417174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016486195,0.000024796096,0.0033836763,0.000020208283,0.0000066898374,0.000011615201,0.005275445,5.189959e-7,0.00008813337,0.24540962,0.7455606,0.000053857035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01983494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10973263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99076754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044724948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031470638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966412407","doi":"10.1353/utq.2012.0074","title":"Federalism and the Constitution of Canada (review)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Constitution; Parliament; Dual federalism; Law; Political science; Federalist; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.010100376058611787,"score_gpt":0.21448319563203255,"score_spread":0.20438281957342078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966412407","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04930877,0.09867776,0.00016065128,0.009556893,0.00047503764,0.00036011424,0.000027050335,0.000013220852,0.8414205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99641097,0.003167673,0.000023482282,0.000094664334,0.000031521773,7.319289e-8,4.4693655e-7,2.8579274e-7,0.0002708814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996277,0.00006656129,0.00004970809,0.000033474207,0.0001370197,0.000085547756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997611,0.000053261545,0.000053738615,0.000033668923,0.000061286504,0.000036966027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021695359,0.000027799528,0.00009928042,0.0000022046215,0.00040070163,0.0000013270679,0.00006645571,0.000013608996,0.00012661115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017768874,0.000022693386,0.000024383266,0.000014111162,0.00093083316,0.0001321806,0.000008526412,0.000015722388,4.94474e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002211382,0.0000130818025,0.00128699,0.000018668316,0.000031558644,5.21009e-7,0.014977414,7.9547775e-8,0.0000041717326,0.9692904,0.0097254375,0.0046295887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010417663,0.000055847024,0.04088675,0.0002117981,0.00015016971,0.0000018222905,0.110992305,0.0000024362212,0.0000046023847,0.0020649328,0.8444323,0.00015525144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98882735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98206633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96722543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000084414205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022933556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34296936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966968079","doi":"10.1017/s0020589310000655","title":"JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING AND TRANSNATIONAL LAW: A SURVEY OF COMMON LAW SUPREME COURT JUDGES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Precedent; Political science; Majority opinion; Judicial independence; Comparative law; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.09705707278559123,"score_gpt":0.34795742791395806,"score_spread":0.25090035512836684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966968079","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73558307,0.00026252144,0.00046641537,0.0009015863,0.0003559278,0.00016117161,0.00018039157,0.000024995838,0.26206392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992251,0.000013361621,0.00026806357,0.00034800346,0.00009551416,0.000012214937,0.000014989322,0.0000029046562,0.000019888015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875563,0.00014779482,0.00029382147,0.00020695524,0.0004482626,0.00014755629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988465,0.0005269422,0.00010505253,0.00004966508,0.0004102265,0.00006163809],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037742726,0.00011972809,0.00025326782,0.00003769336,0.00055032416,0.000057416226,0.0001838692,0.000053954453,0.00014908474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010110441,0.00010956738,0.000044197743,0.00008329298,0.0017889515,0.00031073383,0.00002591503,0.00008875042,0.0000050815297],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016127885,0.00011586664,0.009466194,0.0000015486733,0.000091896574,0.0000025768718,0.01269446,7.463876e-7,0.000015126126,0.976381,0.000070360984,0.0009989179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045215155,0.00022493622,0.23541676,0.00004853194,0.000021905225,0.000004256562,0.003667044,0.00006473928,0.00004121825,0.75358975,0.006275765,0.00019292124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044283792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29972854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26364198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003001989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004709245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9620804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969192061","doi":"10.1086/674453","title":"Theorizing the Constitutional Revolution","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Courts","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Subject (documents); Character (mathematics); Order (exchange); Political science; Political economy; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.020128829349175592,"score_gpt":0.28055381707631194,"score_spread":0.26042498772713635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969192061","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05594345,0.003486138,0.007349537,0.021864804,0.0013263529,0.00007695975,0.000001997105,0.00001223109,0.9099385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99770445,0.0003194223,0.000064269945,0.0009089434,0.0009477242,4.786549e-7,7.330158e-8,6.65975e-7,0.00005395969],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999413,0.0000942895,0.00012457398,0.00003543416,0.00024708954,0.00008557605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995353,0.00015952956,0.0001001443,0.000024080215,0.00013851687,0.00004238787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010092965,0.000033888373,0.000076732555,0.000012015427,0.0010182186,0.00003344508,0.00007133282,0.000023012344,0.000018987352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014914363,0.000020072443,0.00003969459,0.000031432297,0.0017340066,0.000117714866,0.000013981991,0.00008119804,0.0000033112663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007808285,0.0000074162053,0.00059222145,6.061587e-7,0.000012614893,0.0000013102572,0.00059337047,0.0000042416923,0.000017505821,0.9968602,0.00054035947,0.001362355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010548104,0.00002440049,0.0014709478,0.00002638592,0.000019214578,0.000022744469,0.00057767396,0.0000037144678,0.000004959778,0.4424434,0.5552685,0.00003255401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034467492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022804095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.941761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022183043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010777726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78314173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969659142","doi":"10.1093/icon/moq007","title":"Reassessing the new Commonwealth model of constitutionalism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Commonwealth; Normative; Parliamentary sovereignty; Political science; Optimal distinctiveness theory; Law and economics; Constitutional theory; Politics; Sovereignty; Law; Separation of powers; Public administration; Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.040872359185949954,"score_gpt":0.35352177569854604,"score_spread":0.3126494165125961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969659142","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02801645,0.0008183239,0.05946704,0.07333779,0.010160905,0.00026550094,0.00017067244,0.000039425147,0.82772386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99366534,0.00013356937,0.0030705628,0.0012428176,0.0017154071,0.0000017190166,0.0000047733074,0.0000029951432,0.00016280627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757653,0.000080627644,0.0006283744,0.000108069304,0.0014219866,0.00018438448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968922,0.00043106542,0.00056977425,0.00009971049,0.0018446053,0.00016261812],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011034288,0.00011535319,0.00022347148,0.000106680825,0.00073649967,0.000089380126,0.00081298297,0.00009262099,0.0001994711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006940659,0.000084705214,0.00021001186,0.00013809314,0.008714467,0.0005062832,0.00007985804,0.00043915634,0.000010861256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006137055,0.000074480726,0.0008794203,0.0000011073405,0.00014407226,0.000011274169,0.0003525809,0.0011318611,0.0011902582,0.99228007,0.0030153003,0.00085821183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069168117,0.000019862138,0.00050239224,0.00010939943,0.000058967522,0.00018001745,0.00034727587,0.00014532506,0.0003589433,0.5372216,0.46021926,0.0001452524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023581935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023789727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9656489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000106842745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005603524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9940411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970695725","doi":"10.7202/042990ar","title":"Patterson v. McLean: A Confirmation of the New Right at the U.S. Supreme Court","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Presidency; Law; Conservatism; Presidential system; Political science; Civil rights; Economic Justice; Ideology; Power (physics); White (mutation); Politics","score_opus":0.010645468340683662,"score_gpt":0.23692937924674895,"score_spread":0.22628391090606528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970695725","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79694974,0.0007077331,0.00096448156,0.08303501,0.00029075134,0.00029002165,0.000017400649,0.000037082318,0.11770778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99167717,0.000079547375,0.00003762913,0.0016681539,0.0003161786,0.000004464036,0.0000014186361,0.0000026161918,0.006212854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928194,0.00007815985,0.00011101564,0.000078981204,0.00028168512,0.00016819374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965477,0.00009990999,0.00007138733,0.00009328427,0.000038600436,0.000042044936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026160956,0.000054868913,0.00007981052,0.000012009968,0.0009928996,0.00001825279,0.00021164036,0.00006778302,0.00031418295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000079072044,0.000034281304,0.00007691987,0.00012402519,0.0011096586,0.00006423075,0.000030158502,0.000113762086,0.00004399287],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023879375,0.000028924209,0.0071065687,0.000004981646,0.00006322477,0.0000012310304,0.039768714,0.00009242936,0.0003655789,0.86721516,0.05345603,0.0318733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022154026,0.000011109363,0.026540233,0.000025104324,0.000043266125,0.0000025791123,0.003977901,0.000025174866,0.0015092208,0.03313764,0.9343995,0.00010674003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065518944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023288896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8809435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003894504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011434647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99453354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972489427","doi":"10.4000/ethiquepublique.426","title":"Libérer les juges : éliminer la politique (et les politiciens) de la sélection des juges","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Éthique Publique","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Nomination; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.048678570805141846,"score_gpt":0.31219663298211403,"score_spread":0.26351806217697216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972489427","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10802968,0.0072481954,0.0015107037,0.043571755,0.00057047413,0.0002598178,0.000062078514,0.00025420272,0.8384931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9770106,0.007956938,0.001231426,0.0043659694,0.00096567185,0.000113042435,0.0000075999274,0.000034501394,0.008314243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951475,0.002716019,0.00037573202,0.00044072163,0.0003481954,0.00097183237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997777,0.0010330055,0.0001621109,0.00017520066,0.0005133355,0.00033934772],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002640843,0.000354058,0.0003462975,0.00018327363,0.0012959222,0.00022452987,0.0003616242,0.0009371355,0.00080153684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001502113,0.0003442539,0.00022053663,0.0005362494,0.0058554662,0.00080075994,0.00016882518,0.0008909529,0.00005721037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023284327,0.0003088222,0.01962554,0.000053791926,0.000093976734,0.000030688825,0.0128785,0.0000054647307,0.00008164635,0.95840573,0.002874007,0.0056185503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014284813,0.000082613056,0.09657339,0.00014304761,0.00006533986,0.00007193263,0.0040659774,0.000007635986,0.00076052255,0.54884225,0.34887654,0.00036794326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20346883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022699546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86898094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044038202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013795957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972677636","doi":"10.1007/s10982-012-9165-y","title":"The Law’s ‘Majestic Equality’","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Philosophy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Aphorism; Law; Compliance (psychology); Philosophy of law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Public law","score_opus":0.06362493942019706,"score_gpt":0.31778195334914827,"score_spread":0.2541570139289512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972677636","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034000205,0.0033845224,0.000006712321,0.01284835,0.0003890499,0.00005801699,0.0000036825923,0.000025811376,0.97988385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954101,0.00019747244,0.000010130302,0.0028009263,0.001431733,0.0000071236004,5.485377e-7,0.0000017064606,0.00014025522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994617,0.0000669118,0.000065883694,0.000057307054,0.00015074361,0.00019743733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965215,0.0001749906,0.000018882753,0.000049840794,0.000024508907,0.00007965087],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033658862,0.0000453813,0.000057122936,0.0000030599188,0.002355248,0.000039958595,0.00006990944,0.000027462074,0.000015554411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030045701,0.000029545194,0.000024240133,0.000049542694,0.001258256,0.000107902415,0.000034027213,0.000049368355,0.000050799066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033269707,0.000011404713,0.000964027,0.0000011233292,0.000008773238,1.7441388e-7,0.001226373,3.7024396e-8,0.0000014296855,0.99738216,0.00009809021,0.00030306447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024082905,0.000004193624,0.00030454955,0.0000027355559,0.000005028105,2.0710984e-7,0.00014917454,6.478383e-8,0.0000019290756,0.54112405,0.458353,0.000030970426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007780567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029620985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99201006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010583627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015416992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99894357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973614520","doi":"10.5235/20414005.4.4.512","title":"Two Models of General Jurisprudence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transnational Legal Theory","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Variety (cybernetics); Scholarship; Law; Contrast (vision); Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.023176342841521234,"score_gpt":0.29457069948896153,"score_spread":0.27139435664744027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973614520","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17765181,0.00032989823,0.011229132,0.009301755,0.00022651613,0.00023687411,0.000023257351,0.000049287373,0.8009515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99726826,0.000021916152,0.00073688856,0.0002466419,0.00016289618,0.000027071714,0.000003068303,0.000002986076,0.0015302579],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999067,0.00010668874,0.00014912475,0.000105557636,0.00042457506,0.00014704556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994869,0.0001592109,0.000034733883,0.00004543721,0.00022405494,0.0000496671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038054815,0.000060459115,0.00009548687,0.000039328046,0.00028564743,0.000020653677,0.00016289545,0.000030782758,0.0006708737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027277092,0.000054641903,0.00006606766,0.00013371071,0.0006610016,0.00043386876,0.000010315355,0.000061034156,0.000027581307],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009824165,0.00003244383,0.00008326021,0.0000014279984,0.000018961338,4.2170188e-7,0.0008303457,0.00047842553,0.00038947765,0.9970754,0.00010642656,0.00097358396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014015743,0.00000866797,0.0025045716,0.0000033798651,0.000008045625,3.7496218e-7,0.00034919824,0.00012894387,0.00016927511,0.99177754,0.0048359637,0.00007385311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002902951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036878354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8196165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029899898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020421113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7345596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974261986","doi":"10.7202/043294ar","title":"La procédure nécessaire pour modifier l'article 93 de la Loi constitutionnelle de 1867","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010316534353498226,"score_gpt":0.2594509155154339,"score_spread":0.2491343811619357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974261986","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5996937,0.0066563943,0.010266931,0.0124147665,0.00030276427,0.00020057216,0.00003591939,0.00011702131,0.37031192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9632522,0.00084626884,0.0023605088,0.0016308452,0.0012929534,0.000039169474,0.00000284463,0.000014190755,0.030561022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978049,0.0004898556,0.00025482726,0.00031093523,0.00033976464,0.00079974387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888736,0.00044968043,0.00009559081,0.00012854807,0.00013163092,0.00030720132],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011091616,0.00021591537,0.00024901942,0.000047313173,0.0018025435,0.00016145608,0.00028860164,0.000613987,0.0005608326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006005181,0.00024008412,0.00016895204,0.00035938356,0.008234827,0.00028214976,0.00005610905,0.00067579234,0.00059994607],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035632216,0.00024070944,0.0074760374,0.00003289872,0.00010509304,0.000091789625,0.013013269,0.0013799093,0.00027350464,0.93591505,0.008939202,0.0324969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068893406,0.000032448756,0.00642574,0.00015801088,0.00015526485,0.000110379224,0.008248736,0.0013805475,0.0004104889,0.2073804,0.7745845,0.00042459962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005627237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024537975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76564527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002105003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017882362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976031580","doi":"10.1093/publius/pji010","title":"Shaping the Constitutional Dialogue on Federalism: Canada's Supreme Court as Meta-Political Actor","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Federalism; Politics; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Political question; Democracy; Constitutional court; Constitutional law; Constitution; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.08276134096458518,"score_gpt":0.30945985077585153,"score_spread":0.22669850981126635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976031580","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03675789,0.002158471,0.00015703875,0.8063821,0.0018113361,0.0002770302,0.000058689966,0.000025941095,0.1523715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9732407,0.00022698748,0.000037140435,0.02278453,0.003185158,0.000008017251,0.0000026037046,0.000006155418,0.00050872867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996596,0.00054984784,0.0005201719,0.00013295117,0.0015873316,0.0006136994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974828,0.0011551593,0.00030201563,0.00013791365,0.0006305042,0.0002916089],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020860464,0.00019937468,0.00038249508,0.000058542886,0.003952643,0.00040412773,0.0007229486,0.00007461727,0.00042987723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013519983,0.00010226511,0.0002703369,0.0002080675,0.0020175497,0.0003992858,0.00008099271,0.0005410205,0.000027909797],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046920683,0.00004808663,0.00012309656,0.0000010446814,0.00056453934,0.00001574957,0.0008603624,0.00010372003,0.000010643639,0.9324589,0.06537126,0.00039567755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036163843,0.000052550487,0.0020115757,0.000023210498,0.00044741854,0.00014562305,0.0028654202,0.000010812783,0.00005865239,0.036084753,0.9577378,0.00020056621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40262726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.56461084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9364828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006197619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037592235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977326750","doi":"10.1353/utq.2005.0003","title":"Brian Dickson: A Judge's Journey (review)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Courage; Compromise; Charter; Law; Biography; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.01645860650249682,"score_gpt":0.24759195929207406,"score_spread":0.23113335278957725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977326750","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029859528,0.042771712,0.0011800636,0.017043589,0.0005316339,0.00039165767,0.00002584112,0.00011349753,0.9080825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879851,0.010201997,0.00030083556,0.00027468873,0.0001412931,1.4829398e-7,0.0000019107174,0.000002144035,0.0010919266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993795,0.000045258043,0.00007574909,0.0001090618,0.00023653316,0.00015387905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996525,0.00001599338,0.00006557152,0.000073448566,0.00010263734,0.0000898644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015659988,0.00005776754,0.00014759279,0.000008915273,0.0005190332,0.0000058735827,0.000204206,0.000037144848,0.00080647564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015468979,0.00006484603,0.000096217045,0.00004286061,0.00039476677,0.00026232365,0.000013479509,0.000038448852,0.0000613044],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067935645,0.00033687093,0.0013740289,0.00008204607,0.000200901,0.00011344108,0.11588515,0.0000041079643,0.00007295069,0.7412431,0.032703884,0.10791558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008706601,0.00032916514,0.016683416,0.0004953019,0.00010504893,0.0000028748275,0.06358822,4.3196152e-7,0.0000030556519,0.009940554,0.9077303,0.0002509797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3560812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3348853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95812553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026443804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021007181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8830343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977448376","doi":"","title":"Judicial Hegemony: Dworkin's 'Freedom's Law' and the Spectrum of Constitutional Democracies","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Democracy; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.01396226834492001,"score_gpt":0.23998729793611726,"score_spread":0.22602502959119725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977448376","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043769266,0.076285556,0.0035468112,0.09014309,0.0015810258,0.000582647,0.00001566873,0.00008007174,0.78399587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96988803,0.028277686,0.00002150608,0.00035535786,0.0010732968,0.0000044570465,3.568586e-7,0.0000034026482,0.00037592274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778795,0.00019079717,0.0002636352,0.00012956443,0.00050522306,0.0011228329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938107,0.0002248828,0.00016076044,0.000065649365,0.00010085541,0.00006678798],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017893501,0.00011321125,0.00023185705,0.00004828392,0.0023276785,0.000059006426,0.00024372885,0.00006317431,0.00010842246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019809403,0.0000784108,0.000121810415,0.00021474742,0.009386204,0.0001693917,0.000053575604,0.00070577255,0.000018905348],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052537394,0.000030123754,0.0010927411,9.489304e-7,0.00012145658,0.0000020797963,0.00074895605,0.000010109764,0.0000040907075,0.99634767,0.00025304043,0.0013362366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089304143,0.00005710631,0.00027219797,0.000019499988,0.00005963956,0.00010788324,0.0034843197,0.00001841496,0.0000053906715,0.95875555,0.03621841,0.00010853071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035284238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023817344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92611873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025607695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008701608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99897116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977498393","doi":"10.5539/res.v7n8p221","title":"Correlation between Concepts of Legal Position and Decision of Body of the Constitutional Justice","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of European Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Phenomenon; Constitutional court; Scope (computer science); Position (finance); Russian federation; Political science; Economic Justice; Enforcement; Legal research; Legal realism; Sociology; Epistemology; Business; Philosophy; Computer science; Constitution","score_opus":0.0833321627097433,"score_gpt":0.3886245833660857,"score_spread":0.3052924206563424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977498393","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15825583,0.5976076,0.0015814498,0.0016326227,0.00080120255,0.0007957981,0.00013603912,0.00001519808,0.23917428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9498898,0.049804393,0.00015735878,0.00004581197,0.000083211344,9.3910467e-7,0.0000014512126,0.0000014429833,0.000015593947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987771,0.0002745628,0.000423093,0.00007995357,0.00038437216,0.00006091211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840426,0.00033847772,0.00039900484,0.00006856406,0.00076539296,0.000024280713],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011507545,0.000059870483,0.00033152898,0.000020340665,0.00016188092,0.0000017610099,0.00008593032,0.000012728313,0.0000033198942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018329101,0.000039672435,0.00006772888,0.00018810126,0.003161924,0.00008496627,0.000118652686,0.000038850514,0.0000018296345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026413953,0.000055473454,0.021845901,0.0014157428,0.00020661134,0.000001156387,0.0020675417,0.000015958445,0.00011013654,0.96364117,0.0030421398,0.0075717596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002975574,0.0009411196,0.66187125,0.08741641,0.005755468,0.000014785875,0.024648272,0.0000136041845,0.0009673173,0.038453177,0.17618345,0.0007595897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010729484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011527555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.925188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020718784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013114356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977789285","doi":"10.1017/s000842391000106x","title":"Women Lawyers before the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Voting; Political science; Law; Supreme Court Decisions; Economic Justice; Disadvantage; Civil liberties; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03298838640294578,"score_gpt":0.25374221623662646,"score_spread":0.2207538298336807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977789285","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8204148,0.00007743083,0.000013029509,0.0122441845,0.000712689,0.00005366682,0.000017622013,0.0000017088053,0.16646488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990206,0.0000015559498,0.00003146553,0.00067857234,0.00016651451,6.718059e-7,2.3725635e-8,0.0000012577123,0.00009934742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828374,0.00004047995,0.00019205656,0.00006529154,0.0005622675,0.0008561711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99796844,0.00005103174,0.0000746821,0.00006367436,0.00044125147,0.0014009182],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012962526,0.000047525926,0.00010982869,0.000062169864,0.0010212832,0.000024326226,0.0006279853,0.000020524107,0.0002993686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011397713,0.00003113643,0.000032736996,0.00038157133,0.00544654,0.00014815642,0.000016872043,0.000106047024,0.0000017778425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013263225,0.000003053711,0.01553984,6.155935e-7,0.000005703338,0.000016601629,0.0059137954,4.3544057e-7,0.0000042347524,0.9776798,0.00064679777,0.00018778534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010037828,0.000108297645,0.7412673,0.000031767424,0.000014308996,0.000021934153,0.049852952,0.000002427723,0.00014156097,0.17532645,0.033026025,0.0001065668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9915579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8023534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011007274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026527707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978172711","doi":"10.1093/icon/mot041","title":"Constitutional reengineering: Dialogue's migration from Canada to Australia","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Business process reengineering; Status quo; Commonwealth; Charter; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Statutory law; Law; Public administration; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.026057979926160168,"score_gpt":0.2839040057802027,"score_spread":0.25784602585404254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978172711","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46644962,0.0009901257,0.057576317,0.14095598,0.033178397,0.0011384247,0.0014598863,0.00012588334,0.29812536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938743,0.00003781361,0.0014933273,0.0020179532,0.0023657053,0.000015240627,0.000044032473,0.0000026784712,0.00014891193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973767,0.00006703943,0.0005827372,0.00016928591,0.0015460849,0.0002581851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970902,0.0002805238,0.00022772652,0.00007212282,0.0020129066,0.0003165049],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027164264,0.00015699604,0.00022889717,0.000089572,0.00042509695,0.00016151853,0.00053917116,0.00007931078,0.0014455599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005307087,0.00014954951,0.00012474874,0.00015877877,0.0024218059,0.00064404565,0.00006158296,0.00020283084,0.00018436414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003383823,0.000044609133,0.0049292413,6.1834083e-7,0.00020369253,0.000056899444,0.0001391636,0.001236041,0.00038604147,0.97706264,0.015549434,0.00035775485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047407337,0.000029008621,0.013647398,0.00010231957,0.000033648532,0.000048080605,0.00032832858,0.000011525304,0.00028309057,0.041779533,0.94300556,0.00025743814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80353504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6077983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9352831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007602534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002609375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978698280","doi":"10.7202/042938ar","title":"The Constitutional Prism of Louis-Philippe Pigeon and Jean Beetz","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Character (mathematics); Point (geometry); Prism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Law; Federalism; Sociology; Political science; Politics; Physics; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.009611361199412922,"score_gpt":0.24335179512509864,"score_spread":0.23374043392568572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978698280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67873055,0.009450438,0.0042403145,0.023827288,0.0003447435,0.00033527397,0.000023346693,0.000079766585,0.28296825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996629,0.0010848229,0.00024502727,0.0002846243,0.00026094823,0.0000065919116,0.000001374413,0.000001816411,0.0014857764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992783,0.000045997407,0.00012843114,0.000103109836,0.00023583794,0.0002083292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948096,0.00029503368,0.000053581964,0.00005613287,0.00004846649,0.00006582242],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040723497,0.000059631322,0.000093581635,0.000021357311,0.0013882184,0.000031541455,0.00012361878,0.000082891405,0.00002612345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031240963,0.000048610294,0.000043112792,0.00010176555,0.0071136896,0.0000659991,0.000024537838,0.00012943095,0.000011228854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000093466515,0.000012960953,0.002667831,0.0000013510594,0.000022939406,0.0000012663652,0.0019299337,0.00000829937,0.00003133562,0.9568188,0.0003459152,0.03815001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019230349,0.000020970181,0.009294451,0.00001815679,0.000024590521,0.0000033265635,0.0027786286,0.000019144469,0.00007890674,0.17159754,0.81585765,0.000114337905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00126007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002254727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81551176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017524746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017372609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979319784","doi":"10.4000/rccsar.239","title":"The Janus Model of Legal Regulation: Changes in the Political Status of Justice","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RCCS Annual Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Democratization; Rationalization (economics); Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.05014283873728248,"score_gpt":0.36527672161605856,"score_spread":0.3151338828787761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979319784","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017753694,0.14187014,0.00007914588,0.183518,0.0006717053,0.0011445639,0.00017956868,0.000018837343,0.65476435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9535492,0.045223355,0.00004026507,0.00092391274,0.00015631945,0.000014678614,9.795646e-7,0.0000011558858,0.0000901571],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999085,0.00010988483,0.00017996666,0.000065575245,0.00033487353,0.00022467393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992944,0.0003041004,0.00007205742,0.000100004305,0.00019127013,0.000038186132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008201015,0.000045988196,0.00014360415,0.000009974639,0.00026311053,0.000008831349,0.0001857412,0.000027192822,0.000013891752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010567431,0.000024521147,0.000043727337,0.0001890038,0.00070599833,0.00005377856,0.00002446935,0.00010314054,0.0000026401865],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022633,0.000015812207,0.000081651175,0.000065017935,0.0000034696238,2.300024e-7,0.000832397,0.0000016871653,0.000010151888,0.98938936,0.00054084446,0.009057103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000961531,0.000040551902,0.006965585,0.0005307863,0.00013529617,0.0000013613985,0.010893203,0.000064917476,0.000019486859,0.077576235,0.90356714,0.0001092957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035720402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014075439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9357955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000137172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023141349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7854426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980063009","doi":"10.1093/pa/gst009","title":"Activism or Democracy? Judicial Review of Prerogative Powers and Executive Action","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Democracy; Politics; Law; Action (physics); Political science; Parliament; Judicial review; Sociology","score_opus":0.034420464553759154,"score_gpt":0.3157295645846952,"score_spread":0.28130910003093607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980063009","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2817606,0.023963667,0.00025358459,0.055434037,0.0016948051,0.004001503,0.00008608479,0.00019824205,0.63260746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9731218,0.025615761,0.00016411439,0.0006119772,0.00015390932,0.00005925212,0.0000042640418,0.0000043666632,0.0002645456],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989794,0.00013589545,0.00019294124,0.00018172417,0.0003101241,0.00019990843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999411,0.00016871348,0.00013795846,0.00006094482,0.00013586764,0.0000855455],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020893475,0.000105753155,0.00022740575,0.00003393261,0.000452146,0.000015496475,0.00009031675,0.000039352297,0.0009270039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019435881,0.00008506129,0.0000528602,0.00019563692,0.00079031324,0.0004468543,0.000054489024,0.00008275987,0.00004092625],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00089683663,0.0012933708,0.04450153,0.0023588045,0.0022370003,0.000043496235,0.08882476,0.000004942568,0.0023035724,0.11608921,0.4023629,0.33908358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017312844,0.0008858271,0.05468279,0.008811963,0.0006165145,0.000012033351,0.6986019,0.000013904718,0.002787562,0.10481619,0.12578996,0.0012501045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017293392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031148363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6913612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009938961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013809052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980851840","doi":"10.1093/icon/mon038","title":"Roundtable: An exchange with Jeremy Waldron","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.05071779769662236,"score_gpt":0.32312169056542595,"score_spread":0.27240389286880357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980851840","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14209318,0.0021267661,0.022373607,0.018161228,0.0052818297,0.00027620947,0.0001020835,0.00008975896,0.80949533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947526,0.00043671165,0.0010073802,0.0010021981,0.002011076,0.0000041258763,0.0000088869465,0.000004079491,0.0007729578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978052,0.00008843712,0.00033733007,0.00013262632,0.0014277373,0.00020870591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99773544,0.000113338596,0.00025200058,0.00006154654,0.0016594467,0.00017821511],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041731537,0.00011825479,0.00018954698,0.00011958285,0.0008759272,0.000108032975,0.000465448,0.00006231349,0.0003433183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011540556,0.00009462005,0.00009241907,0.000141843,0.003638192,0.0019309864,0.00003715505,0.00018049161,0.000027919134],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013974821,0.00014982524,0.004648365,9.0116157e-7,0.0001621967,0.0003014711,0.0005788321,0.00012847951,0.000035687164,0.99252146,0.00087796047,0.00045505541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010186082,0.00016638763,0.0030654834,0.00008562733,0.0000348149,0.0013264868,0.0005141636,0.000004103616,0.00007866885,0.03032093,0.9631726,0.00021211561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002753104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026253317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96229464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039065297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014673076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981017098","doi":"10.7202/042590ar","title":"Constitutional Patriation as prologue : phase two constitution-making and reform of federal institutions","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Prologue; Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Law; Philosophy; Sociology; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.024027353658438666,"score_gpt":0.3212616249395169,"score_spread":0.2972342712810782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981017098","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.559017,0.0120588755,0.0358933,0.016492033,0.0013799364,0.00069441256,0.0003858206,0.00010521489,0.3739734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935343,0.0011210922,0.0025096934,0.00087645574,0.0009826199,0.00003519122,0.00003971045,0.0000043988935,0.000896508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980218,0.00014694994,0.00052870705,0.00034922676,0.00043672908,0.00051662716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989541,0.00018161035,0.00028435985,0.00011628862,0.00027717408,0.00018642665],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006445801,0.00023759443,0.00036657642,0.00010359512,0.0023752097,0.00007449195,0.00017112358,0.0003540599,0.0002046237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003292698,0.00026168348,0.00015357631,0.00044701473,0.019851645,0.000660809,0.000059396472,0.00044201614,0.00006485925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009156562,0.00025118756,0.0011344949,0.000026856607,0.00014117033,0.000019576648,0.0030071428,0.00044288323,0.0000807376,0.9443447,0.00011594148,0.05034373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035250299,0.00025882432,0.001130298,0.00043067592,0.00033492097,0.00023339114,0.0070017437,0.00039278864,0.0002156753,0.19931088,0.7865455,0.0006202521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008748488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006205667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7864296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024377133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016689729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981347521","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1434685","title":"Tracking Inconsistent Judicial Behavior","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Vector Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Tracking (education); Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.018323883134778157,"score_gpt":0.29787158176932466,"score_spread":0.2795476986345465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981347521","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9301254,0.0010788323,0.00031263134,0.0041922717,0.002029227,0.0001563036,0.0000019429995,0.00006259003,0.06204078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960166,0.0012001456,0.0000366009,0.00013500612,0.0021550164,0.000008762203,5.6999477e-7,0.000006256101,0.00044102417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762416,0.0000660978,0.00019127624,0.00012602544,0.00041511373,0.0015773153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995366,0.000045908317,0.000092347735,0.00005890757,0.0001608949,0.00010535556],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017284466,0.000090722264,0.0001264892,0.00006143142,0.001970991,0.000086158594,0.00023512036,0.00008707668,0.000119057266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023378145,0.00008228815,0.00011979552,0.00016411877,0.00046900506,0.00019154421,0.000028917737,0.0017641402,0.00005932112],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008476746,0.00005377638,0.01323376,1.9453088e-7,0.000034623117,0.000005945345,0.00055395963,3.0391348e-7,0.00046827673,0.937242,0.000052264524,0.048346456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039055292,0.000096165146,0.01979288,0.0000098265255,0.00010014729,0.00018299442,0.012100009,7.519864e-7,0.000048655846,0.89549506,0.071525976,0.00025698007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00390869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14948153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14557284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003885512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003931746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982177579","doi":"10.1504/ijmbs.2014.068969","title":"The impact of procedural capital and quality counsel in the Canadian refugee determination process","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Migration and Border Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Immigration; Political science; Notice; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.03733388302114962,"score_gpt":0.42196476859087906,"score_spread":0.38463088556972946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982177579","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9811875,0.0019646883,0.000015546535,0.015527372,0.00014109514,0.00007159644,0.0000041061453,0.0000013640595,0.0010866878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99769896,0.001970063,0.000011970257,0.00014630982,0.00014632486,0.000003894643,5.546932e-7,9.942057e-7,0.000020949043],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991281,0.00012140413,0.0002458418,0.00004885964,0.00037574358,0.000080070335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854225,0.0002815302,0.00019895194,0.00002006021,0.0009298097,0.000027397255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001252516,0.000050966624,0.00010004544,0.00006256454,0.00047890295,0.000072989074,0.00012722972,0.000021999444,0.0000016203501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009733782,0.00002630209,0.00003371332,0.00007732262,0.00046501728,0.00016849168,0.000009640055,0.00007154922,1.6210355e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019120876,0.00010590493,0.49091706,0.000017870298,0.0004456766,0.000005374528,0.20234223,0.000050145045,0.000057562556,0.2507552,0.0009696427,0.054142155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000466215,0.0001434386,0.89713424,0.000072236566,0.000020213129,0.000016792146,0.05243039,0.000070633105,0.000013430683,0.04096323,0.008578046,0.00009111871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08008212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86078805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7807059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000866634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026743658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9260437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983575886","doi":"10.1177/0539018404042581","title":"Compromise and Public Debate in Processes of Constitutional Reform: the Canadian Case","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Information","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Ratification; Compromise; Negotiation; Law and economics; Political science; Outcome (game theory); Law; Economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.031465269363169054,"score_gpt":0.28948810526408314,"score_spread":0.25802283590091407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983575886","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70475996,0.00005432876,0.000051815616,0.01134164,0.00014903549,0.00027224823,0.000026354692,0.000015634883,0.283329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996059,0.000024889056,0.000022658556,0.00029790847,0.00003277274,0.0000111409945,0.0000026381827,3.5049771e-7,0.0000017260435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916357,0.000015217568,0.00016353175,0.00005420963,0.00037332246,0.00023017515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994643,0.000021084938,0.00007377844,0.00002534827,0.00033527164,0.00008023294],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008217184,0.000041140756,0.00006411215,0.00016137776,0.0035660686,0.00013774406,0.00013681858,0.00003642826,0.0000071511886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004888948,0.000030451203,0.000011193982,0.0012269957,0.007700538,0.0017259042,0.000028920344,0.00006227526,0.000004508397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015279223,0.0000053141616,0.0016738444,0.0000031729242,0.0000017271747,0.0000025272282,0.01879964,0.000013796343,0.0000021778785,0.97656083,0.0000054149446,0.0029300395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002018608,0.00008597816,0.16706805,0.0001470455,0.000043492953,0.00019568387,0.42955938,0.00019617793,0.00014364721,0.3047925,0.0949733,0.0007761415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.63476455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86570495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6717683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075574394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005782939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984457982","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2008832","title":"Senses of Sen: Reflections on Amartya Sen’s Ideas of Justice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0373418907034442,"score_gpt":0.35116044628230114,"score_spread":0.31381855557885696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984457982","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6829189,0.008419825,0.0012482913,0.0040730517,0.0015721065,0.00017936983,0.000011324253,0.000042271404,0.30153483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99423856,0.0038729948,0.000044367698,0.0000856326,0.0009853877,0.0000016804539,4.1143247e-7,0.0000044868593,0.0007664585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980775,0.00015133704,0.00022928105,0.000072731884,0.0003959755,0.0010731539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999335,0.00015205072,0.0001826248,0.000059744598,0.00019229007,0.00007830714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014108093,0.000078538826,0.00016271588,0.000080223654,0.00073132507,0.000008682812,0.000111352776,0.00005472561,0.00004083848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033054582,0.0000672414,0.00010585939,0.00026273914,0.0003477307,0.0001498786,0.000018929028,0.0005148805,0.000019859239],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004567966,0.0000983784,0.0017772623,0.0000032687437,0.00009589313,3.9224963e-7,0.002183264,0.000014275998,0.00035525815,0.9931002,0.00021250003,0.0021135747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005716779,0.0005488985,0.0067335083,0.00010145243,0.00042116552,0.00011190664,0.10674028,0.00000204299,0.001050013,0.83582646,0.047581732,0.00031087353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020174228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073916344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31131965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044292488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016021391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5624835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985150001","doi":"10.7202/1026929ar","title":"La portée élargie de la procédure bilatérale de modification de la Constitution du Canada","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Constitution; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.011869946902618637,"score_gpt":0.2484286990955924,"score_spread":0.23655875219297376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985150001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51411873,0.003174305,0.0075358446,0.010111041,0.0005390384,0.00035608566,0.0000898965,0.00010948943,0.4639656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99383855,0.0020518545,0.0007523243,0.0005371492,0.0013097215,0.00006396162,0.000019479134,0.000013237978,0.0014137138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974214,0.0009773659,0.0002971081,0.00032668948,0.00029154564,0.0006858813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985314,0.0007076423,0.00018263354,0.00016908042,0.00012484837,0.0002843909],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021911592,0.00017181168,0.0002832522,0.000047126327,0.0008922802,0.00010749076,0.00028605643,0.00041499926,0.00007277072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010528921,0.00024526005,0.00011790996,0.00036560107,0.002142793,0.00018137349,0.000052428208,0.00041455982,0.00003269089],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016240188,0.000120825476,0.059498727,0.00009178814,0.0000526244,0.00011987099,0.0016436888,0.0013397721,0.0002459151,0.92455655,0.0043690554,0.007944925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000502217,0.00003839145,0.08387753,0.00034615473,0.00021697863,0.0005389714,0.0014612577,0.002654723,0.0002272735,0.21882983,0.69077605,0.0005306453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5008688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25870597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70572674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022717204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048631825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987123712","doi":"10.1080/713649335","title":"The 'Haves' and the 'Have Nots': An Empirical Study of the Rational Actor and Party Capability Hypotheses in the High Court 1948–99","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Political science; Power (physics); Constitution; Politics; Law; Law and economics; High Court; Test (biology); Sociology","score_opus":0.06880131897825816,"score_gpt":0.3732283465553949,"score_spread":0.30442702757713674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987123712","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94107044,0.000036842684,8.543798e-7,0.0571163,0.000098422206,0.00022725803,0.0000059392496,0.0000016188353,0.0014423024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992157,0.000027793532,0.000010023562,0.00046815551,0.00020311888,0.0000042469605,3.3487403e-8,0.0000012486531,0.00006966396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99720997,0.00080582034,0.00036253358,0.0001452704,0.0010560558,0.0004203744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99794817,0.0014438714,0.00010905665,0.00014395862,0.00017861181,0.00017634654],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004711002,0.00008532523,0.00016796985,0.000020805412,0.0018819943,0.00018010028,0.0007159109,0.000032149477,0.000054587537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014619074,0.000031423166,0.000050018065,0.00031869044,0.013990061,0.00028016706,0.000055952532,0.00027106647,8.9214893e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012214857,0.00034667394,0.31327063,0.0000013795936,0.000019477824,0.000005281133,0.02246067,0.000014414283,0.000027080338,0.66220635,0.00023369028,0.0012921816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034912914,0.00013767628,0.8920223,0.000009309823,0.000023042923,0.000014453609,0.031121256,0.000006625779,0.000017851267,0.075094044,0.0011577723,0.000046510762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074109193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062436857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5871123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000069197275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044764084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987266328","doi":"10.1080/09644000802300718","title":"Legislative Politics in Germany: Some Lessons and Challenges","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Politics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Federalist; Politics; Public administration; Political science; German; Federalism; Constitution; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.10271203329397266,"score_gpt":0.34439507551101434,"score_spread":0.24168304221704168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987266328","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.592513,0.011246365,0.0000056658387,0.039458126,0.00026824215,0.00017074583,0.000041180625,0.000077792465,0.35621884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815864,0.015837383,0.00003103255,0.0006184522,0.00068494264,0.000008024212,0.0000014843549,0.0000058281535,0.0012264387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888,0.00006936083,0.00015612454,0.00016573108,0.00023889434,0.0004898742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995442,0.00013427003,0.00003791622,0.000081336,0.00006122967,0.00014105177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001414681,0.00010328972,0.00017263801,0.0000824675,0.0008403025,0.000014643591,0.00010127021,0.0000799231,0.0000126164305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009036111,0.00010635622,0.000032671873,0.00008912884,0.0014046669,0.00017929604,0.00006735461,0.000122315,0.000035965477],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.058068e-7,0.00002966308,0.0014081418,0.0000055107103,0.000010135446,0.000033701093,0.026592119,3.9836547e-7,0.0000030440688,0.9714798,0.00018959264,0.00024712642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002770035,0.000023518764,0.13258728,0.00003062172,0.000012589857,0.000014485808,0.004480463,0.0000057570896,0.000016459742,0.4997707,0.36253572,0.00024540935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005431482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016460076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47170907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011072432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025084385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8210812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987300884","doi":"10.1017/s0008423902778451","title":"Repeat Litigators and Agenda Setting on the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Politics; Affect (linguistics); Law; Inequality; Sociology","score_opus":0.034004457079714674,"score_gpt":0.26041840384695597,"score_spread":0.2264139467672413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987300884","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81743103,0.00026083548,0.000003452763,0.075311996,0.0003742555,0.000049961367,0.00001789265,0.0000016355647,0.10654895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980073,0.000008876961,0.000017599761,0.0016967955,0.00016591357,2.797524e-7,1.9217982e-8,0.0000011982098,0.000102016886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985706,0.00005720226,0.00017769763,0.00007963211,0.000531585,0.0005832708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984085,0.00026397075,0.00006659541,0.00005423157,0.00024371219,0.00096301705],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010493099,0.000048684164,0.00009589636,0.000060429637,0.0012808179,0.000049682938,0.0002848698,0.0000186148,0.0001791084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031368616,0.000032858105,0.000026331467,0.00028547004,0.003469165,0.00010143711,0.000013243979,0.00011886814,0.0000012911031],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.2593146e-7,0.000002117203,0.0061746533,7.914982e-7,0.0000034753848,0.000023114324,0.00088929554,0.0000013096275,0.000014113813,0.98843765,0.00415225,0.00030080116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037105582,0.00030086705,0.64107627,0.00041891495,0.00006111716,0.00014158439,0.050260272,0.00012938376,0.0013555839,0.12661749,0.17871447,0.00055297936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9361251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95768565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86182016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046566245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005540079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99924284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987710354","doi":"10.1111/1540-6237.8403013","title":"Acclimation Effects on the Supreme Court of Canada: A Cross‐Cultural Examination of Judicial Folklore<sup>*</sup>","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Majority opinion; Supreme Court Decisions; Voting; Context (archaeology); Concurring opinion; Economic Justice; Precedent; Politics; Generalizability theory; Judicial opinion; Political science; Original jurisdiction; Certiorari; Sociology; Psychology; History","score_opus":0.020683654517647698,"score_gpt":0.2891717526265526,"score_spread":0.2684880981089049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987710354","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8912314,0.000025298134,0.000020157891,0.0011936346,0.00031009663,0.00027884476,0.000011256126,0.000013374831,0.1069159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995448,0.0000032403057,0.000011628085,0.00013181586,0.00022862341,0.000018599227,0.0000011869845,0.0000027643562,0.000057368772],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974609,0.00029374467,0.00026556145,0.00020353985,0.0013909567,0.0003853194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877304,0.0003269551,0.00020345078,0.000080694634,0.0005503139,0.00006554399],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019186104,0.00010581445,0.00018864145,0.00005447243,0.0025118445,0.00007319118,0.00035227003,0.0000615108,0.00004457048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00091501244,0.00007805771,0.000072761584,0.0008979806,0.002880761,0.00037921692,0.000010030938,0.00009668939,0.0000032462913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000124496155,0.000044371896,0.0024765646,0.0000076004007,0.000013725338,8.0336144e-7,0.05189379,0.00000782786,0.0012697331,0.9353227,0.00033864233,0.008611806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010336598,0.00083510374,0.73045284,0.00013096612,0.000074955,0.0000010407358,0.17301764,0.00014363359,0.0065440247,0.08308671,0.0040723872,0.0006070643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14301975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.094424665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.852236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034301676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015273181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988391450","doi":"10.7202/042366ar","title":"La Cour suprême et l'amendement constitutionnel","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Parliament; Constitution; Political science; Legislature; Power (physics); Politics","score_opus":0.0157224971836052,"score_gpt":0.2792609643681974,"score_spread":0.26353846718459223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988391450","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2689753,0.0008806224,0.008650367,0.015928268,0.00021848685,0.0001857808,0.000023000543,0.00016431155,0.7049739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99369544,0.00038004783,0.00081025274,0.001858247,0.00029806752,0.00001886135,0.0000032105231,0.0000036607548,0.0029322184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908036,0.00011519841,0.00012126771,0.00013980478,0.0002686574,0.00027471883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996129,0.00013486294,0.000038202747,0.00006215122,0.000049575712,0.0001022595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064288825,0.0000791604,0.00010746478,0.000036029407,0.0008332673,0.000049945367,0.00013419057,0.00012698211,0.00020102695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016857253,0.00008232974,0.00006116808,0.00011970901,0.001740855,0.00012323754,0.000021464035,0.00020610387,0.00012893892],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005822102,0.000036939462,0.0015484883,0.0000014147575,0.000028226668,0.000008713454,0.0061271205,0.000064491476,0.00002497294,0.98009634,0.0020480403,0.010009419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021733753,0.000010198327,0.0030877974,0.000014217363,0.000021331092,0.0000052117816,0.0069976635,0.000009086604,0.000030335314,0.065776266,0.9236984,0.00013215575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034240407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008145694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92165035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007197896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003260481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6414253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988525678","doi":"10.7202/1013031ar","title":"Israel as a Mixed Jurisdiction","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Israeli law; Common law; Supreme court; Comparative law; Civil law (Civil law); Public law; Constitutional law; Municipal law; Precedent; Chinese law","score_opus":0.03365458820360218,"score_gpt":0.3052021177948547,"score_spread":0.2715475295912525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988525678","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026806649,0.0006486297,0.000043737004,0.0021773498,0.0019634992,0.000044851222,0.0000047885524,0.000036631547,0.9682739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971432,0.00025573614,0.00009023897,0.00047033373,0.0017778884,0.0000027333685,3.8459532e-7,0.0000032505093,0.00025625384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990619,0.00009524574,0.00012752778,0.000055659548,0.00034791356,0.0003117675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995826,0.000036703073,0.00006248488,0.000033272318,0.00009332442,0.00019163499],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059194735,0.00005808437,0.00008329411,0.000024218785,0.00800787,0.000036757305,0.0000891269,0.000047918504,0.0001924751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000816212,0.00004889824,0.00007259526,0.0001066645,0.00027539715,0.00037848676,0.000024254728,0.00014807179,0.0004150522],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070035335,0.000039762002,0.0021413574,3.4757872e-7,0.000021242771,0.0000032993678,0.0003863849,5.868414e-7,0.000010685826,0.9930296,0.00057516206,0.0037845925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000108236316,0.00001707798,0.0035691245,0.000008910728,0.00001701717,0.000037026384,0.00206629,2.4749102e-7,0.00006818229,0.017571298,0.97646487,0.000071743954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013880258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014120506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9758897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000113972485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017089289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99328357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990133451","doi":"10.1215/03616878-27-2-213","title":"Courts and Health Policy: Judicial Policy Making and Publicly Funded Health Care in Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Politics; Public administration; Political science; Health care; Health policy; Public policy; Law","score_opus":0.06819827422469975,"score_gpt":0.39528609164275713,"score_spread":0.32708781741805737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990133451","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06417193,0.03784778,0.00000860037,0.8773612,0.00028238658,0.0003469733,0.00012306112,0.000014839566,0.019843249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90164864,0.011719277,0.00007121422,0.08407835,0.0024324332,0.0000019991326,0.0000011185916,0.00000981897,0.00003716433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967226,0.00044034305,0.0009104218,0.00019940604,0.00055085943,0.0011763935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980404,0.00018045583,0.00063791836,0.00008227191,0.00016642407,0.00089254143],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012477364,0.00018686637,0.00066603086,0.00043116088,0.0021055192,0.00010491213,0.00013192905,0.000073258605,0.0000057753628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034183147,0.00017828903,0.00004124929,0.00039823435,0.0006920253,0.0002261083,0.000079507,0.00036345614,4.1054065e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071963736,0.000025130044,0.005508709,0.00009679817,0.000017949747,0.000007940605,0.017044773,0.0000020754032,3.634478e-8,0.959587,0.0025280786,0.015174308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018150603,0.00078378746,0.08920391,0.000617689,0.00001184794,0.00021598862,0.02804485,0.000019125047,4.774548e-7,0.15537497,0.723495,0.00041729276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99783224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98850316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8374767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004039076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022710266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990924378","doi":"","title":"The Reasonable Justice: An Empirical Analysis of Justice Frank Iacobucci's Career on the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Economic Justice; Voting; Political science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.023851754726525006,"score_gpt":0.30757953544384065,"score_spread":0.28372778071731564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990924378","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9197416,0.0066555873,0.0017958378,0.019817758,0.00076051126,0.00022096754,0.000027595233,0.000013085401,0.050967105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99690264,0.00202643,0.0000074673976,0.000274193,0.00038282148,0.0000015556408,0.0000012698359,0.000004200404,0.00039939195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99696094,0.00021921203,0.00033091623,0.00012297477,0.0010444898,0.0013214425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812335,0.00093944743,0.00022463247,0.0001430254,0.00046964904,0.00009990002],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056083016,0.00009975125,0.0002238236,0.00006459778,0.0023673223,0.000027484233,0.00047622598,0.000056223154,0.00004284821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00075433595,0.000057361984,0.00013633275,0.0008721072,0.0004997695,0.00006994635,0.00002676962,0.00071184064,9.228518e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012952481,0.00006755341,0.009988613,0.0000025510485,0.0012587504,0.0000035658836,0.0015065963,0.0004225761,0.000026685453,0.98248553,0.0023054173,0.0018026192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080821826,0.00080608716,0.14013886,0.00006174855,0.012049731,0.000025768473,0.5597283,0.00048100526,0.00022035718,0.18773924,0.097311266,0.00062941434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4044016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9749365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7947463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087826635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008133927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99893147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991144808","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2005.0029","title":"John Willis and the Challenges for Public Law Scholarship in a Neoliberal Globalizing World","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Law; State (computer science); Sociology; Neoliberalism (international relations); Accountability; Political science; Democracy; Corporate governance; Globalization; Context (archaeology); Politics; History; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.043644719354182224,"score_gpt":0.26449566462811497,"score_spread":0.22085094527393273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991144808","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019845625,0.02734086,0.000055131448,0.05460934,0.00015360292,0.00018165864,0.000007092227,0.00001398148,0.8977927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945957,0.004215593,0.00045683456,0.00029483208,0.00024043981,1.4420806e-7,1.5297873e-7,0.0000013111355,0.00019498578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936104,0.00012360906,0.00008127109,0.00007423965,0.00018180601,0.00017806138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996023,0.000112811256,0.00007057859,0.000034444536,0.00010703263,0.00007282596],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007667248,0.000049261205,0.00012344657,0.000013645311,0.0015421577,0.00005303414,0.0001928957,0.00003216808,0.000070008784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041622236,0.000041662108,0.00006617989,0.000032276606,0.0010608555,0.00080378127,0.00005105299,0.00009033466,7.953779e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007408837,0.000018095232,0.0004958205,0.0000014407273,0.000028016224,0.0000018180259,0.0066493973,0.000002484149,5.953607e-7,0.9857661,0.000111485264,0.006850633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015985989,0.000019487607,0.004603043,0.0000442385,0.000024416302,0.0000041820626,0.017004276,0.000007791964,8.5596105e-7,0.07963005,0.896981,0.00008207791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1576394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95920247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9747501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026364654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000064124906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993806464","doi":"10.7202/042514ar","title":"Quelques notes sur les articles 1, 2, 7 et 15 de la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of expression; Political science; Charter; Humanities; Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Human rights; Linguistics","score_opus":0.016416517404488875,"score_gpt":0.2643255200570426,"score_spread":0.2479090026525537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993806464","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94168234,0.0013745206,0.0010443977,0.009153459,0.000051960844,0.000097676915,0.000021050513,0.00013701091,0.046437614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99403965,0.0010161415,0.0010270916,0.0024214068,0.00023625778,0.000023183942,0.0000041009503,0.000012805438,0.0012193559],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851346,0.0003087899,0.00016575513,0.00020652317,0.00020611816,0.0005993384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998955,0.00056681974,0.000056350793,0.00008960119,0.00009825168,0.00023398298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001098594,0.00013889532,0.00018037323,0.0000660681,0.0010183789,0.00012288205,0.00019965565,0.00018661682,0.00009593815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001004547,0.00014398478,0.000087988104,0.00021801521,0.0020261898,0.00027131615,0.000032518376,0.0002762661,0.000029965753],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014254652,0.000055777804,0.013869704,0.0000067882324,0.000048119786,0.000022272076,0.037441872,0.00005866297,0.0004934564,0.8889649,0.00033192118,0.058692276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044904498,0.00005765621,0.1493028,0.00012158911,0.000069951646,0.000021507554,0.008570965,0.00007106012,0.0013166316,0.60431916,0.23516744,0.00053218805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24783176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6209095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37307775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076594297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031954166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.783265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994050578","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2007.0025","title":"'This New Democracy.. . ': Justice Iacobucci and Canada's Rights Revolution","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Adjudication; Law; Democracy; Supreme court; Constitutionalism; Economic Justice; Political science; Dissenting opinion; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.009781214823715448,"score_gpt":0.22387862478239262,"score_spread":0.21409740995867718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994050578","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028036064,0.002710282,0.0013809009,0.002814807,0.00060714333,0.00005866537,0.0000051323595,0.000012508311,0.9643745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948677,0.0007588933,0.0009283869,0.000080095604,0.00039055655,2.8792633e-9,3.521096e-7,0.0000010466982,0.0029730098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999359,0.000037040478,0.000080328085,0.00006894464,0.00028538497,0.00016928135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994826,0.000060591385,0.00008732829,0.000029399831,0.00014206792,0.00019801324],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030072586,0.000046807003,0.00009151227,0.000008679679,0.0028168678,0.000010802457,0.000113117,0.000040695784,0.00074655644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030384812,0.00004937907,0.00003097002,0.000022356055,0.00031956605,0.00027418806,0.000029778068,0.00007561158,0.0000021875821],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009796461,0.000024727382,0.0024494864,0.000004376006,0.000071858965,0.000097009266,0.004730374,0.0000028969525,0.000024734882,0.92483914,0.063588835,0.004068585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003096795,0.000025352425,0.013181183,0.000028108416,0.00009372104,0.0000141460205,0.008829366,0.0000018282298,0.0000073843858,0.0076839174,0.9697315,0.000093808994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99849606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99977547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96683156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006602752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047511345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99848133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995286705","doi":"10.3138/utlj.0425","title":"Republicanism and the division of powers in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Argument (complex analysis); Scholarship; Normative; Law and economics; Norm (philosophy); Political science; Politics; Multinational corporation; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Law; Constitution; Lawmaking; Legislature","score_opus":0.005666595961203131,"score_gpt":0.19097371737783328,"score_spread":0.18530712141663014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995286705","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30569327,0.0009266027,0.00012195303,0.004222271,0.00017983996,0.000052754305,0.0000029106543,0.0000019789506,0.6887984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994595,0.00039600907,0.000034732217,0.000043629374,0.000017019216,5.221277e-9,5.006499e-8,3.2702954e-7,0.00004872978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959284,0.000091306974,0.000053762673,0.000031179356,0.00016935947,0.00006156079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997348,0.00008004219,0.00006685919,0.000023789391,0.00006095945,0.000033551947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003940128,0.000019782306,0.00007845114,0.0000042399465,0.00044511587,0.0000043541545,0.000102783844,0.000010945514,0.000106795465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049324706,0.000015408874,0.000019548957,0.000015684534,0.000560127,0.000104544604,0.000032354812,0.00003750391,6.8831305e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002831416,0.000005379304,0.0105254585,7.88578e-7,0.000011582512,0.0000016493876,0.0038615686,0.0000055646424,0.000002820478,0.9825347,0.00029021007,0.0027319724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026474327,0.00006485458,0.35462227,0.00009189389,0.000036782032,0.000003898365,0.15021072,0.00005323676,0.000007777589,0.028554432,0.46356857,0.00013811831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9992694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95398027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021305456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025166976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34235165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996965981","doi":"10.1080/13572334.2013.812356","title":"Legislative Dissent without Reprisal? An Alternative View of Speaker Selection","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Legislature; Opposition (politics); Popularity; Political science; Legislative intent; Selection (genetic algorithm); Public relations; Law; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07743213812032024,"score_gpt":0.3914000847078785,"score_spread":0.3139679465875583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996965981","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6812211,0.01433442,0.002514796,0.010896406,0.0020309763,0.0010376198,0.000014447933,0.000048587757,0.2879016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99402136,0.0032250418,0.0009588257,0.00008039556,0.000969448,0.000012745396,3.5304146e-7,0.0000075679245,0.00072426675],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977582,0.0004347237,0.0006379849,0.00018476267,0.0007263912,0.00025793514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957764,0.0003527231,0.00095617224,0.0000767869,0.0027354325,0.00010247747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008956307,0.00017890922,0.0006123409,0.00013401418,0.0006050656,0.00003532077,0.00019991655,0.000047108264,0.00010470558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009838403,0.00012753285,0.000174111,0.0003823819,0.0016457702,0.0011408341,0.00007168413,0.00023563117,0.000016651824],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023724965,0.0006242692,0.18756835,0.000044034805,0.0042386996,0.000023101962,0.5556937,0.00022284438,0.0013483464,0.22398658,0.005490328,0.020522507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020160722,0.0023491767,0.2580187,0.0012938363,0.00049067166,0.000035152138,0.38012683,0.00007711523,0.0018879197,0.25551823,0.097249635,0.00093667704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045770686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034082874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31280023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020088768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022357526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6919189},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997683147","doi":"10.1080/10361140802654968","title":"Legislative Versus Judicial Checks and Balances: Comparing Rights Policies Across Regimes","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Judicial review; Commonwealth; Legislature; Supreme court; Constitutionalism; Separation of powers; Constitution; Constitutional law; Veto; Voting; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.07891367019939949,"score_gpt":0.40039293907041656,"score_spread":0.3214792688710171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997683147","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7781032,0.00042881843,0.000041155374,0.039875805,0.0007711015,0.000096469725,0.0000069774987,0.000020404917,0.1806561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99833494,0.00007333673,0.00013236591,0.00052371033,0.0007253299,3.7733955e-7,1.0970312e-7,0.000001183926,0.00020864399],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775636,0.000057164332,0.00029947876,0.00015632418,0.0008189184,0.00091173965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875295,0.00014011461,0.000147929,0.000060439466,0.00033225882,0.0005663032],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00107923,0.000104480365,0.000259291,0.00006231091,0.0014459437,0.00013855017,0.00039678873,0.000043850265,0.000021645836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007010813,0.000080559206,0.000066075154,0.00045196275,0.0058400487,0.00066358125,0.000044882003,0.00020645208,0.0000063731945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034151173,0.00002753183,0.0039176876,0.0000019941124,0.000011179736,0.00001662858,0.0029925494,0.0000011790871,0.00010505549,0.99197656,0.00055345317,0.00036202781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014252289,0.0008261268,0.6238776,0.0006801486,0.00009445833,0.00007363104,0.01679059,0.0000051379366,0.0015726183,0.32760242,0.026547438,0.0005046539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006872559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007017774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6643742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019637347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042979533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001427335","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.23.2.627","title":"Do Women Refugee Judges Really Make a Difference? An Empirical Analysis of Gender and Outcomes in Canadian Refugee Determinations","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Political science; Humanities; Palestinian refugees; Ethnology; Sociology; Art; Law","score_opus":0.06603884986615195,"score_gpt":0.3096297230078696,"score_spread":0.24359087314171768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001427335","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9716914,0.00386503,0.0000040338036,0.0075190114,0.00027402944,0.00014698485,0.00018299512,0.0000025713696,0.016313927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968502,0.0006720372,0.000058961305,0.0014410573,0.00009797413,0.000015414647,0.0000026583252,0.000009558021,0.0008521762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975541,0.0004805569,0.00062780513,0.00023579692,0.00021873618,0.000883009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974061,0.00026297924,0.00032077485,0.00018053716,0.0002153157,0.00161425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022269154,0.00021155954,0.00091304746,0.00069486676,0.00058598066,0.000107183776,0.00038094982,0.00016678715,0.00026134407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030101225,0.0001697944,0.00015633611,0.0008499261,0.0025059334,0.00023312449,0.00003617247,0.00033762903,0.000001609539],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028910377,0.000034625667,0.31166705,0.000011197823,0.0006930579,0.00010169889,0.13575827,0.000004076974,2.6345597e-7,0.547791,0.0000168372,0.003892973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007084988,0.00017104085,0.7598062,0.000066198816,0.0003951029,0.00004153404,0.027202632,0.000028146533,3.1081436e-7,0.19809346,0.013252073,0.00023475141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7155606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9919521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4481392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012825632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021485388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9233216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001503077","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2005","title":"Authority, justice, and public law: A unified theory","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Economic Justice; Duty; Political science; Public law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.020331275350106637,"score_gpt":0.24490026477474316,"score_spread":0.22456898942463652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001503077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010423507,0.00076709944,0.0012770701,0.0017253938,0.00025437094,0.000034444296,0.0000030954145,0.000016732798,0.9854983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99833953,0.0005739569,0.0002932981,0.00011661222,0.00021478416,1.4615328e-8,2.6815943e-7,0.0000012193473,0.0004603319],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930257,0.000206339,0.000061080216,0.00007116949,0.00020815493,0.00015070448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994902,0.000105128,0.00007022693,0.000039397604,0.00015432527,0.00014072577],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006752381,0.000045948032,0.00010379196,0.00000898804,0.0025596241,0.00004074991,0.00016566896,0.000046996985,0.00038113506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007600961,0.00004705261,0.000044124467,0.000021632653,0.0011742023,0.00041080423,0.00006863649,0.00008000593,0.000004266124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020087322,0.000021270434,0.00027830544,0.0000027799958,0.000027985672,0.000003599527,0.002419415,3.9677272e-7,0.000007052108,0.99358374,0.00034552888,0.0032898218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041939545,0.000060546336,0.0030037456,0.000021034484,0.00013058688,0.0000068001223,0.041220393,0.0000062885088,0.0000018503911,0.24731098,0.70770895,0.00010939648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16639698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.498244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.987916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010769901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006976306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002133661","doi":"10.2202/1943-3867.1116","title":"The Pathology of Judicialization: Politics, Corruption and the Courts in Nigeria","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Law and Development Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Adjudication; Popularity; Intervention (counseling); Language change; Political science; SWORD; Power (physics); Law and economics; Law; Political economy; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.0491364021647457,"score_gpt":0.2964268825232813,"score_spread":0.24729048035853562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002133661","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029805189,0.610869,0.000170064,0.027597351,0.0005981719,0.0015464037,0.0000028016773,0.000024669263,0.32938635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75265056,0.24460611,0.000035643385,0.002563526,0.00004022162,0.000028198509,6.81255e-7,0.0000012275219,0.00007380092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993655,0.00020304097,0.00017747041,0.000056161833,0.000101281345,0.00009653954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996914,0.00013094668,0.00006564387,0.00004796081,0.00004977838,0.0000142240415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013447076,0.000041790325,0.00012860002,0.0000043856926,0.00084464916,0.000009312023,0.00007971728,0.000016663309,0.000014972403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009201465,0.000018039174,0.000011504659,0.000058011174,0.0015880021,0.00002386555,0.000046324254,0.000033004344,0.000003003209],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046269834,0.000004261647,0.0011180093,0.000017121401,0.00000599405,3.7551726e-7,0.0058473134,8.171682e-9,1.5231495e-7,0.9887401,0.000089043075,0.0041730325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027520466,0.000010217882,0.033458676,0.0005022648,0.000029142146,0.000004394486,0.0022059549,3.2087394e-7,0.000006629851,0.251669,0.7117501,0.00008813149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015735208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005229271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7370711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010316266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000088428125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6496444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002183418","doi":"10.1111/1467-9760.00124","title":"Constitutionalizing the Right to Secede","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.04843481092712054,"score_gpt":0.33612678477356833,"score_spread":0.2876919738464478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002183418","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01399421,0.0002928148,0.0006508737,0.23038846,0.0008421276,0.000078620455,0.0000047622675,0.000011242616,0.7537369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873604,0.00003302389,0.0001201599,0.00678092,0.00560363,0.0000015583761,1.5163549e-7,0.0000023254522,0.00009779579],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998699,0.00009984944,0.00026974283,0.00006806988,0.0005438799,0.00031943468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989867,0.0002832963,0.000072136165,0.000056008616,0.0003039819,0.00029782718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005118099,0.00006839691,0.00014715079,0.00006182015,0.0008188651,0.000038757116,0.00024673966,0.00003892999,0.00020438767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071945455,0.000042025044,0.00012613875,0.00023015123,0.0010270391,0.0001345911,0.000038932103,0.00017107383,0.00010422789],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017172903,0.000035027453,0.0011340583,7.8377036e-7,0.00002755688,0.00002930148,0.00027432322,0.000005478988,0.000016289485,0.9958051,0.002569523,0.00008538874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008444618,0.000031162304,0.0017155663,0.000024793166,0.000017495784,0.000043652177,0.0003250339,2.5901022e-7,0.000010622455,0.6465161,0.35118246,0.00004843251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063018745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015336089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9733662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001481071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033197715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6298131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003032745","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12342029","title":"Emerging Trends and the General Framework for the Exercise of Sentencing Discretion in Botswana","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Legislation; Judicial discretion; Legislature; Political science; Law; Prerogative; Parliament; Sentencing guidelines; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Judicial review","score_opus":0.02759292219951517,"score_gpt":0.33225649349887604,"score_spread":0.3046635712993609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003032745","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5580137,0.12624939,0.039403893,0.2585779,0.0026168367,0.00066575204,0.000012258433,0.000020704521,0.0144395735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99518067,0.003799732,0.00047293806,0.00007546076,0.00040307344,0.000008287331,3.721217e-8,0.000002243255,0.000057534926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912816,0.00012220953,0.00028038723,0.00006109049,0.00026280453,0.00014532068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985441,0.0009611247,0.00025025939,0.000040065515,0.00018069732,0.00002378305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016166124,0.000065126296,0.00027349684,0.00005517891,0.00073275866,0.000023036337,0.0001361713,0.000018297862,0.0000027398262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00085008884,0.000031658143,0.000102290825,0.0002560875,0.0012753821,0.00010029572,0.000037239755,0.000117465395,8.391885e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027792272,0.000021988015,0.0057148403,0.000008583589,0.00022832533,0.0000015664676,0.04479757,0.0001782205,0.000008677179,0.8361893,0.000326891,0.112246096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023791513,0.0002949748,0.050717525,0.00073154457,0.0005846045,0.000008481994,0.5124807,0.00044042943,0.00004466616,0.37454545,0.05748649,0.0002859839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024836964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022669928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4676831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003543357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036934685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5635861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003292738","doi":"10.2307/3552335","title":"Judicial Power and Canadian Democracy","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Power (physics); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Politics; Physics","score_opus":0.03029203612258365,"score_gpt":0.26528863370429745,"score_spread":0.2349965975817138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003292738","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022221344,0.0006329788,8.672465e-7,0.24700823,0.00022181388,0.000099667355,0.00006511294,0.000029236711,0.7297208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98455435,0.00022218023,0.000009618517,0.012126461,0.0009096403,0.0000075858743,0.0000027814988,0.0000066800794,0.0021607291],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985428,0.000052432213,0.000111388596,0.00018100707,0.0001814042,0.0009309637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974766,0.000032265198,0.000023098662,0.000093615934,0.00010378214,0.0022706378],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018417026,0.00009954928,0.000116492025,0.0005439688,0.0027754568,0.00018157865,0.00020194995,0.000106680614,0.0017505658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082037755,0.000109912595,0.000035762576,0.0006707791,0.00077376066,0.00024443943,0.00001865057,0.00011123429,0.0003354169],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.7461913e-7,0.0000032206863,0.008111328,3.5406205e-7,0.0000130898125,0.000018345057,0.0013960628,3.36401e-8,3.173474e-7,0.9205703,0.056574073,0.013312687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007271779,0.0000068976733,0.023943197,0.0000032072167,0.000003683028,0.000003576963,0.0005305868,0.0000027824206,1.4165859e-7,0.029065715,0.9462286,0.00013884611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99870324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99971026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96233296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009994431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072783856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99916196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003394347","doi":"10.1017/s0008423900000160","title":"Reconsidering the Constitution, Minorities and Politics in Canada","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Federalism; Politics; Political science; Regionalism (politics); Dualism; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Democracy; Philosophy","score_opus":0.051832422210160996,"score_gpt":0.2573608100943222,"score_spread":0.20552838788416122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003394347","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8941838,0.0004979494,0.0000017202944,0.016266214,0.0002872717,0.00003676502,0.0000074893096,0.0000011129588,0.08871767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99848497,0.000034647754,0.000023542487,0.0011904177,0.0001913539,4.725835e-7,2.6775634e-8,6.8802007e-7,0.0000738543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876606,0.000044894852,0.00018422607,0.00006903228,0.000278192,0.0006575863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879,0.00016262129,0.00002512857,0.00003888196,0.00014635018,0.0008369707],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065901806,0.000045163408,0.00009070936,0.00007269268,0.0011862852,0.00008184821,0.000216844,0.000016024032,0.00019249751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082767505,0.000033739798,0.000014479121,0.00028235506,0.005459817,0.00018733914,0.000007244922,0.00012017166,0.0000021341573],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.025034e-7,8.835305e-7,0.043250248,5.354393e-7,0.0000013431553,0.0000375909,0.00072167686,0.000005322259,7.063492e-7,0.9547927,0.00015820407,0.0010304343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019615868,0.000025854233,0.6284642,0.00010206299,0.000014563781,0.00023334849,0.03475349,0.000015307462,0.000039527138,0.20592031,0.13002436,0.00021081921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9984653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99969655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74887234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012780268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037800994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99724674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003674295","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.1.39","title":"FEDERAL JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS: A LOOK AT PATRONAGE IN FEDERAL APPOINTMENTS SINCE 1988","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Political science; Politics; Supreme court; Law; Judicial independence; Government (linguistics); Independence (probability theory); Power (physics); Judicial review; Corporate governance; Public administration; Business","score_opus":0.01858306994758652,"score_gpt":0.2362304961876446,"score_spread":0.2176474262400581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003674295","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4974596,0.0011012526,0.00015180184,0.0009964547,0.00043659838,0.00019152169,0.000017077587,0.000026408105,0.49961928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970781,0.000769328,0.00032386856,0.00012515568,0.00024210777,1.7520651e-7,0.0000025622471,0.0000037857205,0.0014548982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858147,0.00016745579,0.00018785243,0.00017086658,0.0005301698,0.00036217453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945724,0.00003815822,0.00016278235,0.000063314925,0.00011704348,0.00016144282],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027272792,0.00011908184,0.00024628546,0.000026362697,0.004024865,0.000024274863,0.0002703305,0.00007863371,0.0008727435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023181263,0.00013272335,0.0001473461,0.000050821218,0.0010459372,0.000591329,0.0001490428,0.00014303466,0.00003569794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022483293,0.0018575379,0.2802135,0.00002286052,0.0007595972,0.0035587181,0.096619114,0.00010371346,0.00028146367,0.5848999,0.02205377,0.007381446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011728809,0.00096236385,0.29956692,0.00038233763,0.000119734104,0.0003305363,0.112677276,0.000030777723,0.00007994297,0.020651864,0.5520452,0.0014241961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34168532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6248694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5642481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016699127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002523508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W200449026","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2616","title":"Book Notes: The Global Model of Constitutional Rights, by Kai Möller","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02363554532439274,"score_gpt":0.27038715393659923,"score_spread":0.2467516086122065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W200449026","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044034203,0.006015615,0.006846025,0.012838704,0.00035059178,0.00016728998,0.00006232313,0.000021665486,0.9732574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962224,0.0004257112,0.00029044985,0.0022159673,0.0003486181,0.000010037567,0.0000020304935,0.0000021480275,0.00048265717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852765,0.00010285103,0.00028529216,0.00012307253,0.0006490229,0.00031211786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999167,0.000109436456,0.00015290381,0.00008228567,0.00033986947,0.0001484529],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034496325,0.00011395061,0.00016920285,0.000011796585,0.0028258513,0.00011249805,0.00034193377,0.00007940385,0.0010107448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006977675,0.00007218139,0.00013126388,0.000103057806,0.0040269345,0.000396103,0.000054976368,0.00020165204,0.0001286191],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063103785,0.000050238305,0.00034889337,8.534722e-7,0.00005518187,0.0000013868909,0.00019425894,0.00021610555,0.000027732878,0.9410456,0.05785187,0.00020156309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024718186,0.000017473381,0.000105379324,0.00002751053,0.000030820796,0.000017803783,0.00028339762,0.0001772512,0.00004317533,0.81116694,0.18775953,0.00012352267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10374423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036483303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.995782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014194343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036996172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004638390","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v7n2p81","title":"The Discordant Combination of Civil-Law Prosecution System and Presidentialism: A Theoretical Framework","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Political science; Law; Civil law (Civil law); Accountability; Criminal law; Judicial independence; Politics; Comparative law; Public law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.008596283324114315,"score_gpt":0.2714520114758257,"score_spread":0.2628557281517114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004638390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7497271,0.003204606,0.008965865,0.01721439,0.001538102,0.00035850628,0.000016646227,0.000016789516,0.218958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99941283,0.00018240043,0.00004634243,0.00009084327,0.0002534716,8.1106305e-7,1.0872372e-7,0.0000014733034,0.000011726384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992917,0.0001258227,0.0001961934,0.00003842394,0.00024207767,0.00010575136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993079,0.00029952743,0.00014235597,0.000030882115,0.00016086508,0.000058502992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000699757,0.000037943002,0.000110081804,0.000010972345,0.00069400505,0.00007248745,0.000058215355,0.000029608358,0.0000019529184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017761855,0.000022976941,0.000030482359,0.000030561852,0.0018973206,0.00006920973,0.000025303429,0.0000773754,1.7880149e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007691907,0.000014173166,0.00023651024,0.000011253438,0.000016590102,7.851507e-7,0.0008902447,3.2915727e-7,0.000012774029,0.9987185,0.000024017072,0.000067114284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012331517,0.00009107897,0.0013242401,0.00013128795,0.000041476404,0.000010589325,0.0025885645,0.00003148241,0.000060338047,0.98907083,0.0064932955,0.000033481832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015762948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00085793744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24968572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021118038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003848729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6990757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004751260","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2505","title":"The role of reparative justice in responding to the legacy of Indian Residential Schools","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Settlement (finance); Wrongdoing; Plaintiff; Commission; Political science; Order (exchange); Compensation (psychology); Law; Payment; Value (mathematics); Business; Finance; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.010039394971988051,"score_gpt":0.26191666166364763,"score_spread":0.2518772666916596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004751260","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38467318,0.0012647664,0.00012632113,0.0040637124,0.00034297226,0.00015952383,0.000005667105,0.000004221438,0.6093596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993153,0.00022364935,0.00008669146,0.000017296554,0.00013816646,4.540634e-8,6.719695e-8,7.850566e-7,0.00021796783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991514,0.00027959084,0.00012173728,0.000052660824,0.00028241365,0.00011218104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993495,0.00020235893,0.00016222254,0.00006124151,0.00018004455,0.00004465805],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010769399,0.00003427731,0.00010174562,0.000027926048,0.0013848185,0.000020152098,0.0003290422,0.000026250988,0.000045753513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031902824,0.000025141919,0.00005338973,0.00010267226,0.00044865476,0.00029806976,0.00005698833,0.000092867835,0.000001926517],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002535067,0.000016938477,0.0018323766,0.000001674047,0.00003463208,0.000002561911,0.034953903,0.00007585966,0.00018475368,0.95986104,0.00050380535,0.0022789557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043014617,0.00015528333,0.029340513,0.00014320425,0.00007197529,0.000002401686,0.5321781,0.000008204067,0.00036533386,0.02095195,0.41626063,0.00009223299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27125224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6870374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93890905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014873946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013991588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005027983","doi":"10.7202/1007818ar","title":"Breakdowns in the Democratic Process and the Law of Canadian Democracy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Jurisprudence; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Supreme court; Politics; Normative; Sociology","score_opus":0.02575296900620931,"score_gpt":0.2818926077589995,"score_spread":0.25613963875279017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005027983","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04305178,0.0011228027,0.0000017086753,0.0275946,0.0001770819,0.0001444581,0.0000085020865,0.0000032023208,0.92789584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99810964,0.00026249734,0.000013385662,0.001378254,0.00021589373,0.000004367659,1.4047691e-7,0.0000016982341,0.0000141509845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990819,0.00021476907,0.00014915667,0.000041358184,0.0002480484,0.00026475557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995418,0.00018207876,0.00006349902,0.000039184266,0.000069054506,0.0001043468],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014531163,0.00005046041,0.00010251001,0.000037801878,0.005766836,0.000032221415,0.00018090614,0.000028393777,0.000026701324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010724136,0.000025493962,0.000032767384,0.00025505963,0.0011873479,0.00020521093,0.000012754232,0.00016240397,0.0000034809707],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006356661,0.000012760627,0.0033986329,0.0000013860631,0.0000106945445,0.000002339669,0.0042358777,0.0000016569539,4.799701e-7,0.99165046,0.000079633064,0.0005997066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007585281,0.000021473586,0.022853691,0.00005872446,0.00006338923,0.00011582656,0.026670268,0.000004108864,0.000020179326,0.43718886,0.51209915,0.0001457871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67274195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9641386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95505786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038863636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004511667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005828606","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2003.tb01173.x","title":"Litigation in Canadian referendum politics","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Politics; Political science; Jurisdiction; Treaty; Law; Democracy; Constitution; Humanities; Public administration; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04835473702286285,"score_gpt":0.2951007665525397,"score_spread":0.24674602952967684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005828606","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.101891756,0.00011349199,0.0000151999875,0.07860673,0.0004532376,0.00021138357,0.000055996978,0.000024485087,0.8186277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99791074,0.000017510043,0.000036927642,0.00089510425,0.00015768745,0.000018706063,0.00005359346,0.0000038342523,0.0009059093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881345,0.000112687165,0.00015259848,0.00014257239,0.00016367891,0.00061498577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987083,0.000025560517,0.000027830065,0.0000723295,0.00013286318,0.0010330853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042560685,0.000069429494,0.000072732175,0.00027621796,0.0009059787,0.0001288453,0.00008969417,0.000114747294,0.0004054928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008961263,0.000084593405,0.000020286714,0.00043922756,0.00020507918,0.000253744,0.0000018191093,0.00009454852,0.000063209656],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.0246813e-7,0.000004702383,0.025070177,6.36398e-7,0.0000025139905,0.0000101956275,0.00025523346,8.291348e-8,5.5116897e-7,0.97311765,0.0011651639,0.00037289067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062204075,0.00001207521,0.013927312,0.0000049901073,0.000002218104,0.0000017672156,0.0017043689,0.0000027092512,0.0000071740296,0.03866598,0.9455028,0.00010638542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9741121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94433767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016452641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024018336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9815146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007008393","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjm022","title":"Courts and Federalism: Judicial Doctrine in the United States, Australia, and Canada, by Gerald Baier","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Jurisprudence; Doctrine; Political science; Scholarship; Law; Nothing; Law and economics; Judicial review; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.02491157245994363,"score_gpt":0.2890151189613681,"score_spread":0.2641035465014245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007008393","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89622897,0.0010294016,0.000028381732,0.099555515,0.00036305827,0.00014370553,0.000015787518,0.000004662293,0.0026305043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991587,0.0012950368,0.000014934665,0.00625311,0.00047023458,0.0000013178014,0.000004902197,0.0000042505108,0.0003692513],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980218,0.00030542546,0.0004141234,0.000096096024,0.0007485737,0.00041398863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987659,0.0005376697,0.00023403164,0.00006440624,0.00024603872,0.0001519572],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033945986,0.00013167603,0.00021811457,0.000101725076,0.0014394367,0.00032686332,0.000286824,0.000057632453,0.000028240054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021673494,0.0000766145,0.0000325098,0.00025513396,0.0005616053,0.0002879153,0.000047210287,0.000385367,4.6589844e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033762853,0.00015111991,0.02606486,0.000010817405,0.0002237065,0.00027824607,0.025185319,0.000042103467,0.000072402305,0.19416066,0.7500974,0.0033757717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007751266,0.00007110967,0.10135341,0.00003290395,0.000055122004,0.00013830587,0.009029979,0.000005316963,0.00001680238,0.020390037,0.8679326,0.00019924203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9631752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93278426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17377062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014818877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033456078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008220463","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2006.tb01984.x","title":"Tribunals and guidelines: Exploring the relationship between fairness and legitimacy in administrative decision-making","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Legitimacy; Commission; Public administration; Law; Humanities; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.22893367895911143,"score_gpt":0.3940501256658328,"score_spread":0.16511644670672138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008220463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9162795,0.0005259021,0.00066621334,0.06729069,0.0001273608,0.00033505066,0.00004487921,0.000024125871,0.014706287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990894,0.00003120265,0.00017058075,0.00016687189,0.00040250082,0.000060766684,0.000017093727,0.0000040670543,0.000057483565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888575,0.00010475365,0.00031199981,0.00020094679,0.00022230747,0.0002742572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983829,0.0011504143,0.000072244475,0.00007012953,0.0001615972,0.00016267171],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007883284,0.000094722636,0.000118408694,0.00014593321,0.0014383757,0.00031328725,0.000103099286,0.00006340178,0.000016177997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028539074,0.00008334643,0.000019509389,0.0004299004,0.0004671874,0.0005856812,0.000016369246,0.00011779324,0.0000030394324],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026704972,0.0000031127927,0.34435037,0.0000011208272,0.0000026673335,0.000005796866,0.0003022388,3.6010655e-7,1.4139876e-7,0.6470661,0.00029059706,0.007974839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012168025,0.000019949039,0.8021374,0.000066273686,0.000008530697,0.000003637921,0.0050739753,0.0000089444175,0.0000010092333,0.14884609,0.04358572,0.00012678493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035561148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8814469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84588575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017890085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018541658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009323749","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100010231","title":"Research Note: Revisiting the Collection of “Justice Statistics by Race” in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Race (biology); Economic Justice; Data collection; Sociology; Political science; Criminology; Law; Social science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.02311066027264884,"score_gpt":0.30775789517836677,"score_spread":0.2846472349057179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009323749","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93149376,0.0017055473,0.00010227442,0.019924613,0.00159252,0.0002736163,0.00033359462,0.000002800552,0.04457126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99771315,0.0006063803,0.00018284009,0.000777938,0.000444102,0.0000031008935,0.0000030518427,0.000006693381,0.00026275762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856275,0.00020753575,0.00036017093,0.000118003896,0.00023481679,0.0005167401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99756354,0.00095797365,0.00015509507,0.00007957728,0.0007239694,0.00051986176],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030002147,0.000083780214,0.00024984078,0.000042186253,0.0016800847,0.000054266555,0.0002413625,0.00009747368,0.00005847585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010114663,0.00007912315,0.000064992455,0.00039620386,0.001213281,0.00011526199,0.000015699547,0.0008511015,2.7448576e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005303506,0.000004174468,0.0025403916,0.00003683064,0.00004410394,0.00004416963,0.03390655,0.00001534626,0.00008797647,0.9467648,0.013165126,0.0033851957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089656876,0.00009871907,0.01581913,0.0003415361,0.00016927907,0.00008988909,0.33435524,0.00018746479,0.000044842862,0.05608094,0.591461,0.00045536723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99810356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8906839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015430058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012998368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009613640","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.4.499","title":"Electoral Fairness and the Law of Democracy: A Structural Rights Approach to Judicial Review","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Democracy; Law; Deference; Fundamental rights; Gerrymandering; Redistricting; Law and economics; Judicial review; Human rights; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.015573670904401118,"score_gpt":0.25021697575501783,"score_spread":0.2346433048506167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009613640","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.079061344,0.050368816,0.00045392636,0.00449815,0.0005571807,0.0005065494,0.00001647066,0.000017228576,0.8645203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99799585,0.0011771852,0.00036896556,0.00017151482,0.00023715849,7.344939e-8,3.731221e-7,0.000001116338,0.000047771322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991934,0.00017516651,0.00010993489,0.000059797156,0.00028556728,0.0001761572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995117,0.000049378483,0.000121545985,0.000045234032,0.00015407067,0.00011806155],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052184856,0.000059295424,0.00022153916,0.0000063317666,0.0018057559,0.000010070109,0.00020131226,0.000030594423,0.00012845412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024001261,0.000042100994,0.00008370117,0.000042190262,0.0013016535,0.00037661553,0.00006537471,0.00007639093,0.0000011470114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007290074,0.000017188255,0.00077918277,0.00001192951,0.00004808614,5.681126e-7,0.005046377,5.7397506e-7,0.0000039123083,0.9930567,0.0005466949,0.00041590162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004577926,0.00022865091,0.041691095,0.00111477,0.0012080101,0.00011604409,0.035270594,0.000014645589,0.000061649356,0.16325527,0.7516763,0.00078501255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.362905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21997476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9189345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010376791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049455477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009788905","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-1346.2000.tb00577.x","title":"ISSUES AND OUTCOMES IN STATE SUPREME COURT JUDICIAL REVIEW CASES","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Southeastern Political Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Supreme court; Civil liberties; Law; Political science; State (computer science); Quarter (Canadian coin); Government (linguistics); Politics; History","score_opus":0.051383463093386844,"score_gpt":0.37572327817469653,"score_spread":0.3243398150813097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009788905","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0177003,0.78287065,0.000001786003,0.116443455,0.00010404845,0.0009094525,0.0000907515,0.00006237894,0.08181718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39491642,0.58496207,0.00001583043,0.0183124,0.00017652627,0.00004414258,0.0000032332734,0.000008199627,0.0015611516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980864,0.00027291555,0.0004257372,0.00023987367,0.0004087722,0.0005663202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993267,0.0002082265,0.000038282,0.00012044729,0.00006117352,0.00024519445],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000664514,0.00015803838,0.0006247635,0.000023940569,0.00022253254,0.000027439812,0.00014436002,0.000037320748,0.0012215124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078179484,0.00012223588,0.00010537047,0.00017212736,0.00071948505,0.00010003652,0.000042846765,0.00012260993,0.0005299651],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019740093,0.00018619072,0.11368747,0.0033420536,0.000068925874,0.00013717373,0.0014304715,5.4461044e-8,2.6901992e-7,0.7891757,0.001682878,0.090269096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002592697,0.00005559223,0.023051625,0.022504175,0.00016878375,0.000017438639,0.00045443905,6.52487e-7,3.9474796e-7,0.056304112,0.89677703,0.0004064614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016571572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031876354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89509416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037697944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012644271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010437755","doi":"10.1515/9781773855714-072","title":"8.1 Political Failure, Judicial Opportunity: The Supreme Court of Canada and Aboriginal and Treaty Rights","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Political science; Law; Supreme court; Politics","score_opus":0.021699491344589514,"score_gpt":0.22770152724088724,"score_spread":0.20600203589629773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010437755","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00069299305,0.0005282243,0.000006614053,0.0004389919,0.00010988834,0.00016076212,0.00014972054,0.000012892725,0.9978999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27985612,0.00046945404,0.000048948834,0.00012961538,0.00033147752,4.5712312e-7,0.000012340547,0.0000126354325,0.719139],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990817,0.00003036762,0.00011794852,0.00017994035,0.00039961914,0.00019046427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993939,0.00012548351,0.000078717465,0.0000849066,0.00013236752,0.00018461807],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000114129594,0.0001356637,0.0002813209,0.000039130522,0.00057651947,0.0000121412395,0.00015970529,0.00013585175,0.000046068344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007945642,0.00011529944,0.000058687696,0.0000066890866,0.0029091942,0.000030574196,0.00011138025,0.00020052474,3.0122743e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031977816,0.0000033751217,0.000022591701,0.00002289006,0.00014108953,0.000071810806,0.0006901782,2.9156348e-8,7.982004e-7,0.9970985,0.001503997,0.00041274994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011056193,0.000023590394,0.00008858858,0.0000960829,0.00026009855,0.0000031422553,0.00037625188,0.0000021864985,0.000005090981,0.16383736,0.8350838,0.000113272545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91802686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9358591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8335798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008923849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013425837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011843670","doi":"10.1093/icon/mol006","title":"Constitutionalism and policies toward women: Canada and the United States","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parallels; Constitutionalism; Dozen; Gender equity; Political science; Equity (law); Political economy; Sociology; Law; Gender studies; Economics; Democracy","score_opus":0.011874555518844613,"score_gpt":0.26382739331514155,"score_spread":0.25195283779629696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011843670","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57851845,0.0061108624,0.0026254703,0.19292787,0.005435243,0.00036992846,0.00035066018,0.00004309322,0.21361841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941775,0.00075056823,0.00008462251,0.004017422,0.0008561081,0.000005853231,0.000014501286,0.0000019371266,0.000091485104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828374,0.00011455657,0.00038879996,0.00010025727,0.00091746665,0.00019519795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980864,0.0005810161,0.00022464685,0.0000361594,0.00096995645,0.00010181525],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067046826,0.00010957014,0.00019274866,0.00009593937,0.0007481843,0.00014892322,0.00024554037,0.000040263123,0.0000576925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025740569,0.00007675515,0.000049419137,0.00012195257,0.012522115,0.00023483342,0.00007191756,0.00014875871,0.0000013576429],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012577782,0.000020445163,0.0023771648,0.0000014423237,0.00014004283,0.000038111695,0.0006222834,0.00027970472,0.0000047630024,0.9942943,0.0020207886,0.00007518703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010532993,0.000009653765,0.0018929073,0.0000309992,0.00002049408,0.00018547049,0.0016190492,0.000013003626,0.000008054994,0.31931847,0.6757555,0.0000931172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7915421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35986236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6749758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033376523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018521189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99016523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013553651","doi":"10.7202/1013003ar","title":"La signification du droit à la liberté d’expression au crépuscule de l’idéal","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Freedom of expression; Political science; Human rights; Law","score_opus":0.0112266483568004,"score_gpt":0.24595530327013565,"score_spread":0.23472865491333525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013553651","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6192532,0.0055322023,0.009361044,0.0043227603,0.000986614,0.0002026755,0.000026231244,0.000103500905,0.36021176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98299557,0.0013710855,0.0006931011,0.00042970653,0.0019222111,0.000044398206,0.000011220062,0.000018529701,0.012514185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977377,0.00056120724,0.00024227604,0.00025185643,0.00039103307,0.0008158937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871117,0.0005944136,0.00013295877,0.00014245155,0.00007125756,0.00034774104],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014298207,0.0001973346,0.0002286532,0.000056515746,0.0013066662,0.00007647913,0.00027018297,0.000611797,0.0001993022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040348741,0.00021803458,0.0001762798,0.00033636988,0.0027930643,0.00042247903,0.00006393273,0.00049793784,0.0002739983],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002529958,0.00024074028,0.02001332,0.000028789418,0.000059189613,0.00001643695,0.041218683,0.000026255264,0.00090307096,0.90028965,0.0026323954,0.03454614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039237202,0.000042144246,0.07353245,0.00019221607,0.00017797871,0.00004709442,0.011511139,0.0000564267,0.0009466471,0.17428805,0.73831373,0.00049974787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009985062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008282055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73568135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018983114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038591685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016119038","doi":"10.1017/s0008423904240215","title":"Chrétien and Canadian Federalism, Politics and the Constitution, 1993–2003","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Constitution; Parliament; Politics; Memoir; Political science; Law; Biography","score_opus":0.01861059505004551,"score_gpt":0.2715755101814465,"score_spread":0.25296491513140096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016119038","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5690212,0.0021752885,0.00011707467,0.21441758,0.0014195072,0.0002782828,0.00005438824,0.000008777163,0.21250786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957042,0.000047701495,0.00009212286,0.0038422865,0.0002614242,8.900975e-7,1.384277e-7,0.0000014574581,0.00004982956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983857,0.000052393098,0.00019104259,0.00011271451,0.0003280384,0.0009301102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99634045,0.00007696044,0.000046817535,0.000054081152,0.0005379657,0.0029437146],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012005738,0.00007421035,0.00014057463,0.00017123726,0.0038155084,0.000282341,0.0002634299,0.000044206896,0.000022794678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027091326,0.000051701336,0.000025374738,0.0004921058,0.021193372,0.0002751407,0.00001695577,0.00015639831,0.000004671164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010716143,0.0000015232469,0.0034720646,7.0679243e-7,0.0000044957073,0.000029241317,0.0014202879,0.0000016627184,0.0000012532703,0.9948322,0.0001320471,0.00010342721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009383026,0.000053197262,0.15107045,0.00007369837,0.00004249763,0.00033347655,0.009760658,0.00000413268,0.0000213597,0.7250391,0.1124393,0.0002238239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9855535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9741185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42668292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009130885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026475526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016158199","doi":"10.1177/0090591707299808","title":"Citizenship as Inherited Property","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Politics; Scrutiny; Citizenship; Realm; Property (philosophy); Property rights; Analogy; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); State (computer science); Political science; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.052380025567756144,"score_gpt":0.34489306100206124,"score_spread":0.29251303543430507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016158199","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047334746,0.00012820862,0.00038672597,0.0039828965,0.00019622117,0.00009048155,0.0000025489721,0.000099010125,0.9477792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912039,0.000007762039,0.0000480676,0.0029492085,0.0007186381,0.0000042989395,7.622823e-7,0.0000039558404,0.005063398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879605,0.00014991543,0.000118012205,0.000116975745,0.00026191655,0.0005571119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910635,0.0004931213,0.0000130167155,0.0000601365,0.00008336829,0.00024402358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012780592,0.00006273432,0.00009143381,0.00002808503,0.0005487067,0.00002318782,0.000113875045,0.00006435575,0.00053552986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001698739,0.0000419999,0.00004944799,0.00014504684,0.0014740741,0.000034054763,0.000038899983,0.00009969616,0.0005241848],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029884304,0.000019808278,0.0008510416,0.0000011634462,0.000013444291,0.000013629484,0.000497289,1.8679625e-8,0.00002579766,0.9958064,0.00035198315,0.0023895537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006843667,0.000015321299,0.0037379926,0.000008311329,0.000007552054,0.0000017537894,0.0032279047,1.5589127e-7,0.00009962053,0.9430555,0.04969665,0.00008078053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027521013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014594448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9438692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000089171706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013236937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.673751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016940363","doi":"","title":"Mapping Judicial Independence: Toward a Comparative Taxonomy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Taxonomy (biology); Independence (probability theory); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Mathematics; Statistics; Biology","score_opus":0.054817575136196985,"score_gpt":0.297162550169942,"score_spread":0.242344975033745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016940363","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4959181,0.008292194,0.019269714,0.016065693,0.0014101951,0.0011858747,0.0000034356028,0.00015018047,0.4577046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99589354,0.0017733132,0.000078701465,0.00022260085,0.0012515942,0.000051769865,6.37472e-7,0.0000039421175,0.0007239092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99715203,0.00014463915,0.000229903,0.00015608191,0.00052303576,0.0017943105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993641,0.00006148655,0.00013384323,0.00004871076,0.00027444455,0.00011744448],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011953604,0.000118524935,0.00020389124,0.00008859451,0.0015469916,0.00012829265,0.00029826572,0.00008306913,0.00031239734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008604263,0.00010470862,0.00010048263,0.00029396795,0.00045151796,0.00042496977,0.000047786692,0.0012261642,0.00043080773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009550894,0.000037286634,0.005188097,7.081474e-7,0.0001475586,0.0000019566417,0.0059935343,0.000004933531,0.00003426849,0.9733645,0.0011273297,0.01409028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027714626,0.00007117587,0.003999849,0.000018192452,0.000012620322,0.00002819988,0.115977935,0.000006623284,0.0000072724238,0.81818646,0.061221547,0.00019296701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015151809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012572871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49997544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095712626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043792417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017292580","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2010.500831","title":"Supreme Court of Canada – structure, status and challenges","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Original jurisdiction; Mandate; Jurisdiction; Remand (court procedure); Political science; Judicial independence; Administrative law; Court of record; Certiorari","score_opus":0.026019683573685455,"score_gpt":0.262253881313707,"score_spread":0.23623419774002158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017292580","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.447686,0.011650722,0.0000016315228,0.11107665,0.0013136165,0.00031505738,0.00013339131,0.000049211394,0.42777374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99701697,0.0020095354,0.0000959608,0.0006343732,0.00016019074,0.0000034175168,0.000002096775,0.0000037573136,0.00007369254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906665,0.000064828295,0.00014801927,0.0001268768,0.00028928113,0.00030435144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993884,0.00016768806,0.000070961134,0.00009695094,0.00010732847,0.00016867298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024361743,0.000075520475,0.00016364032,0.000011760981,0.0006728888,0.000011388425,0.00012606455,0.000056861307,0.00032966014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012144375,0.00006948282,0.000015135476,0.000044080505,0.0008142494,0.000017448752,0.000059227583,0.00016119127,0.0000021225242],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008740721,0.0000113570695,0.0031176123,0.000016071328,0.000012335806,0.0000015435405,0.00068645924,4.0794677e-7,0.00002193346,0.9893453,0.0049417964,0.0018364582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011409729,0.000015012173,0.018382344,0.000009339844,0.0000059249032,5.837569e-7,0.00102124,3.2527467e-7,0.000033322834,0.013521225,0.96681875,0.00007781271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92894256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9955924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97582406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037283153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060047174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5175385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W201753266","doi":"","title":"Measuring Judicial Activism on the Supreme Court of Canada: A Comment on Newfoundland (Treasury Board) V. Nape","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Judicial activism; Political science; Appeal; Judicial review; Legislature","score_opus":0.036966772179187465,"score_gpt":0.2444831273525288,"score_spread":0.20751635517334133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W201753266","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8062034,0.0011936626,0.000093084884,0.087212786,0.00070379,0.00025445514,0.000006299536,0.000022061924,0.104310416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957028,0.002039465,0.0000016218631,0.0013044793,0.0006583039,0.000005031242,3.6460798e-7,0.000006574047,0.00028133515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99713075,0.00021180547,0.00021049756,0.00012867287,0.0010779703,0.0012402816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992846,0.00024328052,0.00015218892,0.000087680186,0.00014486062,0.00008735307],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014538466,0.00012633819,0.00019994724,0.000044627024,0.002618005,0.000018696814,0.00027711203,0.000044175402,0.00003435668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023463632,0.000088126304,0.00009458961,0.00016243033,0.00037518915,0.00006403551,0.000024783445,0.0009254077,0.0000059995414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021753921,0.00014355114,0.009323654,0.0000010376255,0.0003278419,0.000014482577,0.0015684912,0.000060338392,0.000041121737,0.9787133,0.0073751416,0.0022135428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024046,0.0014448254,0.09411096,0.00028750693,0.00016349522,0.0001931448,0.024958149,0.00001741089,0.00029608447,0.56763124,0.30759865,0.00089390605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.663212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94109964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.411082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027237898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012039685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018150336","doi":"10.2307/3505128","title":"10.2307/3505128","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":365,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Political philosophy; Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics; Comparative law","score_opus":0.012792714028428428,"score_gpt":0.22750587903695402,"score_spread":0.21471316500852558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018150336","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00077661587,0.00009912316,2.5550577e-7,0.0022413258,0.0000045226566,0.00008007386,0.000004728651,0.000076091055,0.9967173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007284291,0.0000025751426,0.000018426046,0.00015358174,0.0003056117,0.000008791327,0.0000012280398,0.0000024708847,0.992223],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994407,0.000029044877,0.00006540816,0.000097845135,0.00018908434,0.00017786324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997875,0.000033196848,0.00000841983,0.000051279436,0.00003635095,0.00008323407],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012084959,0.000047436417,0.00007184711,0.000017773358,0.0004873687,0.000024916253,0.00011535856,0.000026622603,0.9873939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000518553,0.0000449382,0.00003101837,0.00017723687,0.00017085912,0.000057704605,0.000017230688,0.000030323676,0.9757244],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000213761,0.00002812889,0.0000025364213,4.1268277e-7,0.000012744047,0.000003259005,0.00025673106,0.000010470567,0.0000041290314,0.0024197577,0.17693612,0.82030433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003949921,0.000019152745,0.0001352247,0.0000044411686,0.0000050358317,2.3590852e-7,0.00001531131,9.430445e-7,0.0000018557927,0.0004468864,0.9992625,0.000068895104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019723105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024258256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8223264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003261206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000064259824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37484953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018826812","doi":"10.7202/042190ar","title":"L'égalité selon la Cour suprême","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Meaning (existential); Political science; Sociology; Subject (documents); Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.010711717006732843,"score_gpt":0.2597845375894135,"score_spread":0.24907282058268065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018826812","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55139816,0.0006821695,0.00060305477,0.0074185585,0.00012341511,0.00008830428,0.000009068399,0.00012138843,0.4395559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890018,0.00022705727,0.00041646912,0.00086345983,0.0005916266,0.000009424235,0.0000018091765,0.000004606378,0.008883712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991998,0.00007690174,0.00009403661,0.000121194826,0.00023802677,0.00027002237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966055,0.000118934455,0.000028565708,0.0000575779,0.000042364474,0.00009198764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039851243,0.00006661163,0.00009883984,0.000027889873,0.0008461578,0.000041567648,0.0001416952,0.00013179725,0.0001369963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014661334,0.0000689949,0.000060062688,0.00013837211,0.00089594146,0.00009387462,0.000015330783,0.00016516066,0.00014725942],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063728426,0.000022980672,0.0039269472,0.0000015162638,0.000020428142,0.000008532961,0.0076916385,0.000013554182,0.000037831316,0.9647419,0.0022736762,0.02125466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011892447,0.000008125346,0.007966302,0.000008505939,0.000015011379,0.000003076315,0.003558376,0.0000066062626,0.000051324463,0.06341606,0.9247317,0.00011600438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064400923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008454236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.922458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004205821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014953887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9735536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W20199416","doi":"10.1111/j.1525-1470.2009.01069.x","title":"Petitioner's Observations on Canada's Additional Information","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pediatric Dermatology","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Petitioner; Political science","score_opus":0.016686444012769513,"score_gpt":0.2391803852590053,"score_spread":0.2224939412462358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W20199416","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06624324,0.0004274891,0.00043800185,0.20380586,0.0017498744,0.0004101336,0.0018402549,0.0002566641,0.7248285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916953,0.0001578442,0.00019371652,0.0061460296,0.0012898012,0.000053265176,0.00030068003,0.0000017793652,0.00016159531],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992198,0.000045293535,0.00017126671,0.00006980623,0.00030116132,0.0001927259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994514,0.0002277597,0.000066798624,0.000045269106,0.00014202793,0.00006671627],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005063693,0.00005913135,0.00008004075,0.00006718544,0.00079926447,0.000017966293,0.00009443325,0.000049733542,0.0016841306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023586725,0.000060944352,0.000024868054,0.0002125634,0.0001091277,0.00027387764,0.00001616441,0.00007556944,0.00038227937],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028040442,0.000017474109,0.006495748,0.0000014834618,0.0000052752484,0.0000023921248,0.00019029556,0.00005528952,4.6939093e-8,0.4415913,0.5508137,0.00082418026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009373708,0.0000031871712,0.042610057,0.0000011367985,0.000009038736,0.000005447342,0.0002486596,0.000014263321,6.3808176e-7,0.0029737884,0.95396507,0.000074993324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16528483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67742354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92545205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016230078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011786903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020852836","doi":"10.1177/106591290205500110","title":"Attitudinal Dimensions of Supreme Court Decision Making in Canada: The Lamer Court, 1991-1995","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Conservatism; Charter; Political science; Voting; Law; Context (archaeology); Roberts Court; Principal (computer security); Politics","score_opus":0.12749155805501733,"score_gpt":0.40548025179090824,"score_spread":0.2779886937358909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020852836","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7871309,0.0016135938,0.000103372964,0.07060625,0.00042840524,0.00065271347,0.000073730014,0.000026513737,0.13936453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99930084,0.00006862648,0.000044896417,0.00023169954,0.00019461804,0.000021796988,7.0135576e-7,0.000004459326,0.00013233966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963339,0.00043860136,0.00028757748,0.00020442379,0.00171769,0.0010178242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99630594,0.0029644398,0.000027249494,0.0001615206,0.0003218779,0.00021894043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013789047,0.00008554927,0.00019015878,0.00009363546,0.000877635,0.00003810972,0.00035062397,0.000049052174,0.00038602718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012740634,0.00005539556,0.000052246614,0.0004971747,0.0016650455,0.000090207766,0.000063450585,0.00039088694,0.00007401573],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021487738,0.000090501446,0.019043842,0.000004124417,0.000017418444,0.000040144594,0.00193687,0.0000018373211,0.0000131927545,0.9588746,0.012228006,0.007727975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007148656,0.0004932596,0.32866338,0.00047285238,0.00002957508,0.00000809301,0.053593922,0.0008179285,0.000015361691,0.48449326,0.13028269,0.0004148396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9719931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47438136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007946973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009708005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67501473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021055257","doi":"10.3828/bjcs.19.2.5","title":"The Rawlsian Paradox and the Governance of Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Science and Engineering Research Board","keywords":"Polity; Charter; Constitution; Context (archaeology); Politics; Political science; Corporate governance; Law; Constitutionalism; Parliament; Political economy; Democracy; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Economics","score_opus":0.010130898722740275,"score_gpt":0.22207278372484912,"score_spread":0.21194188500210884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021055257","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13868321,0.5733015,0.000002468998,0.108189195,0.0013355503,0.00020655131,0.000076389326,0.0000032082191,0.1782019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9601694,0.03862676,0.000010309712,0.00024553854,0.00031617144,0.0000017128096,5.7030608e-8,0.0000016734947,0.0006284119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906594,0.0000910032,0.00024129744,0.000044044635,0.00034734912,0.00021038511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989901,0.0003594561,0.000191537,0.000029850607,0.00035262093,0.00007639206],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071790675,0.00004630346,0.00018075906,0.000018743009,0.0020616031,0.00004672706,0.00016065901,0.000014417101,0.0000037534408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066733366,0.000030838688,0.000043993015,0.00019702164,0.0019253568,0.000052969746,0.000016235444,0.000090877205,1.4304797e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002509506,0.0000047141957,0.00418617,0.000003832298,0.00022069401,0.00017621939,0.001277287,0.000011702622,4.691195e-7,0.70681643,0.26625216,0.021025239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038226138,0.000009316406,0.10160761,0.00009732341,0.000033488293,0.00008751561,0.013702267,3.2360404e-7,0.000002631306,0.032523222,0.85148877,0.00006526985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9983912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99996585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8214862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016050557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018164284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024782077","doi":"10.7202/1000624ar","title":"Legality as Reason: Dicey, Rand, and the Rule of Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Law; Rule of law; Constitution; Constitutionalism; Public law; Political science; Comparative law; Philosophy of law; Sociology; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.05092749860751865,"score_gpt":0.28922524883468015,"score_spread":0.2382977502271615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024782077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012528741,0.0009269808,0.0000059334607,0.0023462863,0.00021939479,0.00006382036,0.000007784317,0.000007961761,0.9838931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99881434,0.0004100585,0.000053700838,0.00044414736,0.00017998785,0.0000020073646,1.0693137e-7,0.0000017864019,0.00009387832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918556,0.00017048724,0.00016032427,0.000066392044,0.00027517913,0.00014203435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957895,0.000085768246,0.00009939271,0.000048830498,0.00011368792,0.00007338802],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010712912,0.000052993637,0.00014352829,0.0000074579884,0.005168764,0.000025368829,0.00013476456,0.000033540106,0.00020275195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008953448,0.000031347892,0.00007215569,0.000053094627,0.0025787414,0.00015263625,0.000043741304,0.00012303954,0.000012369558],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000109510955,0.000020648406,0.00029675063,9.963617e-7,0.00003429696,0.0000053471745,0.0018576346,7.272921e-8,0.0000015535435,0.99641025,0.000033069795,0.0012298862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079910684,0.000023917202,0.0014687167,0.000020529742,0.000038374248,0.000029454246,0.0014870362,2.4960363e-7,0.000119022436,0.32385486,0.6720992,0.000059568287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13230835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045352653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98628557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018446299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015130112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99612635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025065369","doi":"10.7202/042663ar","title":"The Proposed Section 96B : An Ill-Conceived Reform Destined to Failure","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.012330239767582012,"score_gpt":0.2536858776288648,"score_spread":0.24135563786128278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025065369","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8266868,0.0016691923,0.0014662291,0.09846106,0.0014442522,0.000563282,0.000024278062,0.00014383822,0.06954109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96800923,0.0003237585,0.0013233128,0.0020870967,0.0029592416,0.000035800775,0.0000058996566,0.00001276689,0.025242873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983116,0.00016997465,0.00023773723,0.00028989377,0.0003764438,0.0006143956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915016,0.000111670546,0.000092482645,0.00015879345,0.00022355889,0.00026333795],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060883537,0.00017676225,0.00017779965,0.00003746053,0.0033303262,0.00013022624,0.0003256619,0.00027976488,0.000080169884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029256305,0.00014405853,0.00010338793,0.00051154866,0.0022510712,0.0003106771,0.000038535218,0.0004006458,0.00016758962],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008205759,0.000073889234,0.00057377754,0.000007168121,0.00008125111,0.000009713936,0.02194069,0.00018840976,0.0004901307,0.7372454,0.0016519277,0.23765562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027438332,0.00019399704,0.008333557,0.000055458826,0.0000702634,0.000013421142,0.025044933,0.00012563342,0.00027666576,0.042495903,0.9227947,0.00032107244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016636195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14493474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92114276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024863447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029866994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025174668","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.2.091212","title":"OPINION WRITING AND AUTHORSHIP ON THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Legal writing; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Style (visual arts); Writing style; Government (linguistics); Political science; Dissenting opinion; Judicial opinion; Staffing; Sociology; Literature; Linguistics; Philosophy; Art; Medicine","score_opus":0.023712041430609454,"score_gpt":0.22749929703170937,"score_spread":0.20378725560109992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025174668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33998123,0.00079073606,0.000029917002,0.015400048,0.0002473475,0.000096494085,0.0000074277896,0.0000045165075,0.6434423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999448,0.00024570528,0.000039525963,0.000057064775,0.00007480994,1.7902224e-8,1.1060372e-7,5.475602e-7,0.00013422857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995421,0.00006952656,0.000053269046,0.000034387856,0.00021231601,0.00008840092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996345,0.000092325456,0.00006814644,0.000023061799,0.00012653161,0.000055452107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026444576,0.000027002203,0.00006165449,0.0000032525297,0.0011969146,0.000010385904,0.00010465792,0.000018717445,0.00053494255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003820514,0.0000218319,0.000021013419,0.000011651005,0.000356505,0.00013261694,0.000023847368,0.000055340683,5.0542207e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011070021,0.000010703148,0.0031706472,0.0000020393156,0.000029166391,0.0000016257655,0.004241616,0.0000032941966,0.000024155868,0.98237383,0.009124056,0.001007798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062491646,0.00016908238,0.21019784,0.00025390903,0.000044164608,0.000008663398,0.3009421,0.000037190777,0.00006142038,0.040383127,0.44702873,0.00024887276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98758614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98606473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9419907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014448325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017551088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.920582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026316860","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.1.23","title":"JUDICIAL RESTRAINT IN THE PURSUIT OF JUSTICE","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial restraint; Adjudication; Political science; Worry; Economic Justice; Law; Reputation; Honesty; Judicial opinion; Judicial activism; Judicial review; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.01814470664394893,"score_gpt":0.26093746463234535,"score_spread":0.24279275798839642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026316860","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18653984,0.00023113916,0.000050548842,0.0035633885,0.00049076066,0.00006185088,0.000005544968,0.000003853049,0.80905306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99923426,0.00022456559,0.00018852514,0.00006407322,0.00023977079,1.6779833e-8,1.3790508e-7,6.189869e-7,0.000048023267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993258,0.00008002682,0.00008032611,0.000043129367,0.00036420286,0.000106495056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996356,0.00008309353,0.00008923397,0.000042246833,0.00011377858,0.000036044636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077274244,0.000031495172,0.000083642,0.000009391719,0.0007842381,0.00001238008,0.00041816878,0.000040435087,0.0004589415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000082910716,0.000026869966,0.000054166714,0.000034177538,0.0009669462,0.00017111188,0.000033762255,0.00015362859,0.0000017187648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003083657,0.00004776301,0.000704344,0.000001540783,0.000012354451,0.00001717681,0.014574803,0.000002808323,0.00020456103,0.9820263,0.00076722703,0.0016102832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008253928,0.00012979655,0.10736786,0.000052251075,0.00015876062,0.000018440755,0.26554507,0.0000037573036,0.00002593438,0.04874052,0.57698005,0.00015216546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3608528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85582095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9332858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005784122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013505295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64340335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028611703","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2009.00095.x","title":"The Transformation of the Supreme Court of Canada: An Empirical Examination <i>By</i> DONALD R. SONGER","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Charter; Court of record; Constitution; Court of equity; Concurring opinion; Remand (court procedure); Original jurisdiction; Legislature","score_opus":0.02944391954885508,"score_gpt":0.27536890724518565,"score_spread":0.24592498769633056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028611703","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35390723,0.00019127132,0.00017158774,0.5713059,0.00035001725,0.0004368489,0.00015034387,0.000012949738,0.07347387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99906194,0.000019764688,0.000004868085,0.0006582136,0.00006948726,0.0000056070166,0.000025503974,0.0000014949484,0.000153121],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892735,0.00013663131,0.00021920163,0.00007859239,0.00043484668,0.00020337894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993215,0.000059066606,0.00010102358,0.00008924986,0.00027125646,0.00015789882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057479914,0.000056098,0.00007262962,0.000024960009,0.0010957437,0.00004416008,0.00020667144,0.000055794673,0.000023189463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020052599,0.00003973075,0.00002950134,0.00026769273,0.0003216112,0.00026846095,0.0000024960548,0.00006307527,3.0898354e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009118339,0.000044428976,0.002992255,0.0000029034777,0.00001608982,5.3697806e-7,0.0021646302,0.0000015498454,0.00012052097,0.9328752,0.0421157,0.019657034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014345172,0.00010393338,0.13688022,0.000010193049,0.000016729991,0.0000014365833,0.005432651,0.00008107441,0.00054938765,0.006717142,0.8499372,0.00012658106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56057054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9261581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031866413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0086293565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028840259","doi":"10.1093/icon/moq002","title":"Proportionality: An assault on human rights?: A reply","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Human rights; Law; Political science; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.04493501811351099,"score_gpt":0.3839571434318165,"score_spread":0.33902212531830556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028840259","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23254713,0.00004510374,0.0006823905,0.015788132,0.007214994,0.00019108887,0.000087401975,0.00006535092,0.7433784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993111,0.000005963635,0.00064089097,0.0020907798,0.0038685878,0.0000060429315,0.000020189951,0.000003847888,0.0002526641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965489,0.000113319176,0.00059176446,0.00019375047,0.0023416854,0.00021060911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962871,0.00014599576,0.00042088225,0.00011397235,0.002807662,0.0002243663],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014025937,0.00013968901,0.00020466326,0.00016216478,0.0013663223,0.00015845783,0.0006478552,0.00012891126,0.0008644756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035499112,0.00011711897,0.00019121567,0.000113396934,0.004461219,0.0007353177,0.000041811607,0.00061370473,0.000067428526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000091672046,0.00033747967,0.0016312362,5.9511933e-7,0.00014423562,0.00010752386,0.00015573112,0.000028802488,0.0009847175,0.9949857,0.0012277022,0.00030458774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004005538,0.00007944716,0.001955901,0.000033646604,0.000019026307,0.000112797694,0.00007070691,0.0000015144643,0.00027516606,0.3270897,0.66983753,0.00012399614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004026665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068579484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7605639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000166543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095381273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030920387","doi":"10.5235/20414005.4.4.700","title":"Complementing Comparison: Renewing Analytical Legal Theory to Meet the Explanatory Challenge of Globalisation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transnational Legal Theory","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Parochialism; State (computer science); Relevance (law); Law and economics; Subject (documents); Political science; Subject matter; Jurisprudence; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Positive economics; Economics; Philosophy; Politics; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.05149921933476077,"score_gpt":0.3310499935176134,"score_spread":0.2795507741828526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030920387","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07945044,0.0006092688,0.014481451,0.070107736,0.00052752654,0.0008582116,0.00007368529,0.000104012004,0.8337877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99859196,0.000006050621,0.0002022925,0.0006649356,0.00027892785,0.000047305293,0.000009559405,0.000006039422,0.00019291547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977483,0.00056570146,0.00039423484,0.00020415352,0.0007988981,0.00028872522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985558,0.00085453567,0.00009529811,0.00010612328,0.0002929518,0.00009529045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021768548,0.00012693962,0.00021352721,0.000074858704,0.0009022008,0.00007535677,0.00033858523,0.000055459437,0.0007322258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020095859,0.000098826255,0.000118387215,0.00028458168,0.0007298726,0.00035722306,0.000039218612,0.00010453354,0.000024002788],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043016254,0.00006878042,0.00047088997,0.0000044249073,0.00008698415,7.341881e-7,0.0039983047,0.00017580898,0.00004284309,0.99277055,0.0007068624,0.0016307823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028628667,0.000046645575,0.008421737,0.000021221998,0.000062108855,7.5564424e-7,0.014393841,0.00016090935,0.000057344823,0.8718453,0.104499646,0.00020417836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010644009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016400553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91914153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007797684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019643188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8017359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031340195","doi":"10.1089/1533129041492268","title":"The Administration of Canada's Independent, Non-Partisan Approach","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Election law; Administration (probate law); Political science; Campaign finance; Democracy; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.013278885009387207,"score_gpt":0.28729867776734475,"score_spread":0.2740197927579575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031340195","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33878428,0.0006744354,0.00058139395,0.022218108,0.000526996,0.00015956373,0.000024304738,0.000013519533,0.6370174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980407,0.00047832637,0.000037822007,0.00027884194,0.00091006927,0.0000022270444,8.4064203e-7,0.0000024631586,0.0002487115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917865,0.000043787128,0.0001725852,0.000056235567,0.000291827,0.000256945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995527,0.00004151556,0.00010018994,0.000033236425,0.00013762507,0.00013469467],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026068522,0.00005551554,0.000076097276,0.000026719055,0.0033875864,0.000090853224,0.000073658855,0.00003593139,0.0000027975984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000103546794,0.000041492134,0.000029388048,0.00011059992,0.00041596248,0.00007345929,0.0000119890055,0.00012981912,5.729416e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007857631,0.0000155775,0.00007613872,0.0000014119554,0.000018432593,0.000001117596,0.00044312348,0.000013279262,0.000013067725,0.9986343,0.00015954522,0.0006161742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003522159,0.00014230408,0.010267636,0.000019394882,0.00002292344,0.00013827762,0.0035135692,0.000006522194,0.0006925601,0.78275377,0.20195536,0.00013547452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8505845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87920976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6592564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024705386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002521603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99790984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031808727","doi":"10.17808/des.36.204","title":"\"A quem cabe a escolha?\" Sobre a importância de distinguir os métodos alternativos de interpretação jurídica","year":2014,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Direito Estado e Sociedade","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.026726691247520622,"score_gpt":0.32022987930486624,"score_spread":0.2935031880573456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031808727","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4577026,0.020324264,0.043999627,0.033289295,0.0035022926,0.004440458,0.00072200334,0.0016621475,0.43435732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889487,0.002291576,0.00030761104,0.0027598236,0.0023095622,0.00015093626,0.000024101924,0.000077129116,0.0031305577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99354047,0.0011628673,0.0010710125,0.0010734941,0.0012551037,0.0018970515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996673,0.00081870775,0.00076222635,0.00056259654,0.0003396283,0.00084382494],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028250548,0.0007639509,0.0011461918,0.000114536546,0.0024611442,0.0007284738,0.0012436665,0.0004435048,0.00024195506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030804947,0.0007706536,0.0008221377,0.00083093793,0.0020079648,0.0002698657,0.0005357679,0.0009008649,0.00026389048],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001553169,0.0006733675,0.057061095,0.0007732983,0.0009986577,0.00023504086,0.0775774,0.000034921894,0.0008883078,0.7458724,0.03659631,0.07913389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017878473,0.0004768584,0.018719252,0.003951934,0.001258256,0.00007032318,0.020914277,0.0044823634,0.00025670612,0.02946745,0.9155847,0.003030038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012860436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015267717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8789884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016519913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021142175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99947447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031885758","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12342001","title":"Africa’s Imperial Presidents: Immunity, Impunity and Accountability","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impunity; Presidential system; Constitutionalism; Accountability; Law; Political science; Autocracy; Democracy; Rule of law; Separation of powers; Presidency; Law and economics; Human rights; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.06721779604262115,"score_gpt":0.35442351446103093,"score_spread":0.2872057184184098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031885758","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9260374,0.029472155,0.000012988827,0.0025851896,0.0012673793,0.00011452992,0.0000072468265,0.000017173701,0.04048595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955708,0.002697735,0.00009861017,0.000057396253,0.0014738744,0.0000041238386,1.1318374e-7,0.000004198407,0.00009314662],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982698,0.0003347689,0.00038364014,0.000084854946,0.0005307486,0.0003961903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845016,0.00044362497,0.0002753093,0.00007644409,0.00056629605,0.000188136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021294362,0.000130028,0.0003767089,0.000067037894,0.0012962034,0.000068728295,0.00022372144,0.00004401791,0.000034942994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016543844,0.00009790667,0.000106848434,0.00023840168,0.0016200817,0.00090604555,0.00022563463,0.0002375863,0.000005065061],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005058325,0.00072601,0.36520064,0.000040162162,0.0018066077,0.000025955025,0.33949316,0.0000024677433,0.000407338,0.26807725,0.013848632,0.009865923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008765163,0.00035592326,0.26364326,0.000090366986,0.00033414754,0.000052480744,0.31005642,1.7751877e-7,0.000083816405,0.040118016,0.38396484,0.000424038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046621067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012097091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3701162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019572918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020186542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99694794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034465670","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0066","title":"Legal universalism: Persistent objections","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Universalism; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.011496792284269482,"score_gpt":0.2280273932835177,"score_spread":0.21653060099924823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034465670","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043296278,0.00019535134,0.000106761414,0.0015738904,0.00086148875,0.00003688371,0.0000064494957,0.000019292827,0.9539036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99711674,0.00029057483,0.00039131445,0.00003340472,0.0002657192,1.10306395e-8,3.8723525e-7,0.0000012878585,0.0019005719],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999476,0.00004311837,0.000054650714,0.000065087785,0.00022534243,0.00013580635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995455,0.000023926847,0.00006418327,0.00004522476,0.00020249614,0.00011867563],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017775391,0.00004326548,0.00008188492,0.000012404371,0.0026729703,0.000023725803,0.00019206425,0.0000505218,0.0020544855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020606712,0.0000481816,0.00014729977,0.000030005393,0.0008617832,0.00046603734,0.000036177746,0.00015341344,0.000010492528],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018248233,0.000037061902,0.00041514792,4.997804e-7,0.00005968646,0.000018013392,0.005157871,0.000005425269,0.00015200413,0.9919224,0.0015456103,0.00066803227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021341298,0.00003305429,0.0014247507,0.000006304252,0.000048884445,0.000016355805,0.064153984,0.0000025788233,0.0000055070254,0.0011647108,0.9328631,0.00006732966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.564569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8468473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9907577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019549318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019328331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035058819","doi":"10.1017/s0008423900000238","title":"Models of Public Brokerage: A Reply to Professors Ajzenstat andLusztig","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Sociology; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.06933159791652244,"score_gpt":0.3264673934546688,"score_spread":0.25713579553814636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035058819","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7942713,0.00017630652,0.00020298174,0.03717102,0.00043292664,0.000118652126,0.000019701783,0.000005788606,0.16760135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99692196,0.00001164106,0.00026052384,0.002130121,0.0002144804,0.0000012530068,8.269454e-8,0.0000023636464,0.0004575968],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779505,0.000082924875,0.00031412658,0.00013773059,0.000659538,0.0010106467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964447,0.00007922079,0.000063326115,0.00009041015,0.00068547967,0.0026368776],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017133513,0.00006926421,0.00017767803,0.00024130574,0.00095425633,0.00010376866,0.0005582119,0.00003322506,0.0004559405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014764394,0.00005851521,0.00006548159,0.0009884549,0.0034213585,0.0005301293,0.00001736719,0.00013123834,0.000023406792],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035088174,0.000010796853,0.0017199307,0.0000012627576,0.0000049819128,0.000021657463,0.002424495,0.000029101706,0.000025400554,0.9911324,0.00095441757,0.003672089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061016914,0.0005060167,0.15575722,0.00028205875,0.000052597014,0.00010551781,0.019470423,0.000099013014,0.00044314674,0.60111666,0.22091891,0.00063828024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29327673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14012161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3900157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048707938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009824147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99929076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035135639","doi":"10.1163/156851712x644721","title":"The Relation between Roman and Local Law in the Babatha and Salome Komaise Archives: General Analysis and Three Case Studies on Law of Succession, Guardianship and Marriage. By Jacobine G. Oudshoorn. STDJ 69. Leiden: Brill, 2007. Hardcover. Pp. xiv + 456. € 161.00/US$ 224.00. ISBN 978-90-041-4974-8.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dead Sea Discoveries","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legal guardian; Dead Sea Scrolls; Jewish studies; Relation (database); Biblical studies; Ecological succession; Hebrew Bible; Law; History; Brill; Genealogy; Political science; Classics; Archaeology; Biology; Judaism; Computer science","score_opus":0.023266615486531538,"score_gpt":0.29319775186871383,"score_spread":0.2699311363821823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035135639","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96567106,0.026472759,0.0001063796,0.0024126533,0.00012322588,0.0003531616,0.00030492057,0.000018635943,0.00453718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939464,0.005324311,0.000032507363,0.00024770573,0.00028323664,0.000032359058,0.000030627856,0.000010783873,0.00009207006],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978211,0.0004636955,0.0004216083,0.00037156045,0.0004875665,0.00043449985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832165,0.0011016902,0.00018912723,0.00019713683,0.00005273187,0.00013765915],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010761851,0.0002764152,0.0005269099,0.000069085305,0.0021642558,0.0002584598,0.00015748819,0.00010018953,0.00000775815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001906697,0.00017437553,0.000087709406,0.00037826976,0.0051251934,0.00078268786,0.00022802764,0.0001994914,0.0000014643042],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011788636,0.000050693303,0.72316873,0.000029689154,0.0005014178,0.000029188357,0.009370733,0.000019203007,0.00003695,0.2648487,0.0011254069,0.0007013854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006549361,0.00014957704,0.9303157,0.00008841854,0.0005859122,0.000019814252,0.025972918,0.00004104111,0.000075174445,0.024077069,0.017610224,0.0004092506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02446474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08612187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24077165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044478013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004899885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035806552","doi":"10.1017/s000842390432010x","title":"Constitutional Politics in Canada and the United States","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Politics; State (computer science); Political science; Ideology; Law; History of the United States; Subject matter; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.0189297517105291,"score_gpt":0.2646271552839842,"score_spread":0.24569740357345507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035806552","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93870753,0.00021502913,0.0000782843,0.04887991,0.00036414093,0.00005796115,0.000018723815,0.0000012803603,0.011677141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99706036,0.000023617036,0.000036109737,0.0027550273,0.000117398275,5.133321e-7,2.45059e-7,5.742387e-7,0.000006137066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865216,0.0000483925,0.00018479863,0.000065212786,0.0004010459,0.0006483636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843174,0.00020553908,0.000039348848,0.000032839547,0.00027567617,0.001014883],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009089374,0.000046483496,0.00010151815,0.0001048394,0.0009962139,0.000066772365,0.00025243935,0.000015559159,0.000020962667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016680598,0.000031452797,0.000017385513,0.00055903743,0.018224055,0.0001276715,0.000013752668,0.00013773041,0.000001186542],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016493781,0.0000017264935,0.014969027,3.9841308e-7,0.0000021186993,0.000042336065,0.0006365798,0.00013784038,3.1561845e-7,0.984148,0.000027434671,0.000032539974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007935004,0.000016379248,0.23480882,0.000053922737,0.000010413014,0.00007476705,0.014580971,0.000017667668,0.000012185729,0.73246866,0.017051324,0.00011137342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9998069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99972576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25167936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025089078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054844067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9844478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036099058","doi":"10.1017/s0021855305000021","title":"Constitutional dialogue in Uganda","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Constitutionalism; Constitution; Political science; Parliament; Constitutional review; Appeal; Opposition (politics); Legislature; Politics; Law; Constitutional economics; Democracy; Constitutional court; Supreme court; Constitutional law; Constitutional amendment; Judicial review; Constitutional theory","score_opus":0.02489358992016166,"score_gpt":0.28765272419929133,"score_spread":0.26275913427912967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036099058","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09124597,0.0013290202,0.0001782833,0.015152926,0.0005379982,0.000066541,0.0000085893425,0.000010382461,0.8914703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99792284,0.00016260294,0.00030536257,0.00051858654,0.0010455467,8.385698e-7,2.200803e-7,9.0117777e-7,0.00004312965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916494,0.000058065056,0.00024062404,0.000049382485,0.0003368456,0.00015012985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995457,0.000097601056,0.00011695726,0.000024843122,0.0001377066,0.00007722444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004996182,0.00004602306,0.0001388946,0.00003958272,0.00027143827,0.000021850989,0.00012446444,0.000032290693,0.000114049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014492006,0.00003823528,0.000064286614,0.00020180448,0.0017430849,0.00021675159,0.000015449677,0.00012127449,0.000023401863],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001705127,0.000054804586,0.0036725563,3.7868145e-7,0.000012694818,0.000019214056,0.0018303128,0.000063633335,0.000017308112,0.991655,0.00065495324,0.00200211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035441996,0.0000355129,0.005432778,0.000026810532,0.000010353089,0.000015041484,0.002179241,0.0000010692349,0.00002212925,0.030338563,0.96150804,0.00007604695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018331998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013888193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9613164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016308906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034302377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7749938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036597095","doi":"10.1017/s0008423906060112","title":"Beyond the Democratic Dialogue, and Towards a Federalist One: Provincial Arguments and Supreme Court Responses in Charter Litigation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalist; Supreme court; Charter; Federalism; Political science; Constitution; Democracy; Law; Conciliation; Politics; Mediation","score_opus":0.020896433059455138,"score_gpt":0.274655875999045,"score_spread":0.25375944293958985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036597095","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9530821,0.00017175834,0.000013530325,0.035343274,0.00016263429,0.000102388454,0.000014912182,0.0000019043428,0.01110754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986561,0.000008469584,0.0000479964,0.0008727173,0.00033648705,0.0000021494834,2.7822753e-7,0.0000014309782,0.00007438995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986822,0.000104923,0.00020436756,0.00010639327,0.00038263726,0.00051948894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912375,0.00011724014,0.000051650793,0.00003450963,0.0001648042,0.00050801685],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013100652,0.000058625534,0.00010921806,0.00011854136,0.0012478541,0.00024132563,0.0001609226,0.000032102416,0.0000134810725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010014378,0.000042965246,0.000018355871,0.00024882174,0.004101415,0.0003065187,0.000018401364,0.00011155361,0.0000011702431],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005856488,0.0000082702445,0.050968725,0.000001545219,0.0000020165278,0.000016928698,0.000913984,3.231824e-7,0.00007289238,0.94729817,0.00017004457,0.0005412244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000115086696,0.000034516816,0.769109,0.000022721673,0.000007165458,0.000013469446,0.0008267954,0.000007010476,0.000024675794,0.2291868,0.000598585,0.000054125998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40680698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.646919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7181403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034011406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003481592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036711705","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2009.00057.x","title":"Administration at the Supreme Court of Canada: Challenges and change in the Charter era","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Supreme court; Humanities; Law; Art","score_opus":0.0651308367324946,"score_gpt":0.28145879904214216,"score_spread":0.21632796230964757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036711705","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19677311,0.0017976715,9.803811e-7,0.75776523,0.00012284076,0.00036362754,0.00003554279,0.000005859171,0.043135148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969568,0.00038637687,0.0000022058623,0.0022778448,0.00022984052,0.000029964674,0.000017365202,0.0000015398049,0.00009806305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990969,0.00010706006,0.00014581866,0.00012127085,0.0002840787,0.00024488385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956894,0.00006915543,0.000058152633,0.00009168978,0.000082326515,0.00012975649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005273424,0.00006944377,0.000081969716,0.000040914583,0.000677383,0.000048339836,0.00014225888,0.000053252377,0.000052701525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001256948,0.00004935118,0.000015836364,0.00013784849,0.0002549804,0.00017409584,0.0000052309806,0.00007724256,0.0000011891888],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007621465,0.000018171555,0.0015765539,0.0000025898357,0.000006410506,0.000012059328,0.006364939,2.4737972e-8,0.0000037476227,0.9730967,0.0030552736,0.015855892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012759198,0.00013795374,0.5578032,0.000013358104,0.000009564438,0.0000109595185,0.009469486,0.000008810344,0.000013488006,0.005308555,0.42696697,0.0001300675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.61503357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96778816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002463075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003840564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68129957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037359044","doi":"10.1177/1065912909352775","title":"Judicial Politicization, Ideology, and Activism at the High Courts of the United States, Canada, and Australia","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Judicial activism; Political science; Law; Voting; Judicial opinion; Judicial independence; Judicial review; Case selection; Supreme court; Politics","score_opus":0.056460416537896574,"score_gpt":0.3829438105350005,"score_spread":0.3264833939971039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037359044","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9437982,0.000026050222,0.0000033634235,0.053067025,0.00019392945,0.00016987177,0.00006906086,0.000005562827,0.0026669477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986952,0.000012567544,0.0000034807993,0.00045166016,0.00021252531,0.000010556966,0.0000045558477,0.0000030167325,0.00060645374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980073,0.00039693524,0.00014121129,0.00014216699,0.00068804336,0.00062432163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979897,0.0012488107,0.00002730008,0.00011712997,0.00037640272,0.00024061688],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008001083,0.00006636819,0.00010710937,0.000042697382,0.0014482635,0.000040328654,0.00018284534,0.000065849425,0.00009241257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010349887,0.000039895458,0.000016179662,0.00022737468,0.0069259773,0.000046821035,0.00008374635,0.0003467574,0.000003241867],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007983309,0.000012673046,0.01756161,0.000003234894,0.000013178376,0.0000018423357,0.0010658434,1.4057504e-7,0.000085048574,0.9792608,0.0018398816,0.00014775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014203278,0.00007720481,0.45704547,0.000010227734,0.000012759976,0.0000028477614,0.003957063,0.000007801617,0.00012249929,0.51705325,0.021499062,0.000069781316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.988576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9743024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46220756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011928453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082110375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038584108","doi":"10.7202/040225ar","title":"Le juge et la conservation du régime politique au Canada","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Politique et Sociétés","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06159366110445403,"score_gpt":0.3732001844441075,"score_spread":0.3116065233396535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038584108","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05497858,0.0011807274,0.00009833407,0.39465144,0.0017219213,0.00017989482,0.00020236727,0.000058541496,0.54692817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9661262,0.008083174,0.000070960705,0.019749017,0.0014318973,0.000051062718,0.000037910173,0.000021259268,0.004428541],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967145,0.0012239782,0.00038613076,0.0003304115,0.00053962955,0.00080539327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99811286,0.0009586542,0.0001694387,0.00014381354,0.00031488572,0.0003003518],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008282143,0.000269465,0.00037409112,0.00003917934,0.0016862655,0.00004089574,0.00024701149,0.00027941068,0.0006961254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058765535,0.0003149985,0.00016129855,0.0002897171,0.0021340125,0.0004277811,0.000112050184,0.00042312054,0.000049772792],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006515378,0.00009459533,0.014031528,0.000018385244,0.00007778658,0.000077868375,0.005223922,0.00001047293,0.0000049933915,0.94219065,0.03814251,0.00012077095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003281451,0.000022496799,0.07981924,0.00007345292,0.000028732324,0.00004712262,0.004428695,0.000008451163,0.000055300476,0.22869384,0.6861472,0.00034729886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99799556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9833057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9111476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010185095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022392703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039981008","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2007.0014","title":"Proportionality in Canadian and German Constitutional Jurisprudence","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":222,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Proportionality (law); German; Political science; Law; Constitutional court; Constitutional law; Philosophy; Constitution; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0136201582477239,"score_gpt":0.2739484023916838,"score_spread":0.2603282441439599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039981008","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22476631,0.0010972283,0.00033643938,0.0020330742,0.00020125232,0.0000829918,0.000012961828,0.0000069071157,0.7714628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992357,0.00029785617,0.00022875053,0.000057859248,0.00007640358,1.3214352e-8,5.6536436e-7,4.3996263e-7,0.00010239474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999412,0.000032631426,0.00008758798,0.000063710024,0.000211609,0.00019244185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955654,0.00003030655,0.000053286705,0.000021479396,0.00012526142,0.0002131523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007879758,0.000035184326,0.000072550574,0.000022243363,0.0011670127,0.0000106529205,0.00009080361,0.000040443796,0.00040111959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000319716,0.000039819122,0.000025283227,0.00003091228,0.0020303929,0.00030198917,0.000017917284,0.00007348517,0.0000021605385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014495708,0.000014025737,0.06914519,8.990863e-7,0.000008630541,0.00006251569,0.001775138,0.0000012405512,0.0000059135896,0.9281664,0.00013304502,0.00067250297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002786601,0.000016327573,0.46763024,0.000031398515,0.000010362591,0.000023477442,0.0072772256,0.000001529214,0.0000032331277,0.015395504,0.50924015,0.00009189017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97997284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9127709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063956005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007100809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8975836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040148068","doi":"10.5235/1460728x.17.3.437","title":"Equality Rights, Freedom of Religion and the Training of Canadian Lawyers","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Scope (computer science); Law; Legal profession; Political science; Freedom of religion; Legal ethics; Legal education; Sociology; Human rights","score_opus":0.07793966976316671,"score_gpt":0.326362372260491,"score_spread":0.24842270249732426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040148068","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06238443,0.0005414428,0.0002466247,0.057375766,0.00038555445,0.00014128009,0.000016808577,0.000014517552,0.87889355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989614,0.00019681256,0.00007652826,0.0005620594,0.000105905085,0.0000013037389,4.8896743e-7,9.550749e-7,0.000094585754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919456,0.00027022336,0.00012062129,0.00006162662,0.00024258133,0.00011036768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990235,0.00070096186,0.000057434387,0.00005064447,0.00011611771,0.000051358023],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022938459,0.000034583834,0.000115651594,0.000034509252,0.0006210455,0.00001191169,0.00009057562,0.00009094883,0.000004276106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010321791,0.00002316217,0.000031278392,0.00016532355,0.0029490648,0.0000461083,0.0000149446005,0.00020524045,8.619098e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009072471,0.0000018212318,0.00019578626,0.0000037196573,0.000008413595,1.2508026e-7,0.024395896,0.0000053330846,0.0000046029136,0.97500855,0.00015241478,0.00021428731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002810996,0.00001803477,0.0013702405,0.00003997962,0.000021296364,2.7454638e-7,0.003596693,0.000024480927,0.000025565425,0.41784874,0.5767095,0.000064115084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.980037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9767075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9365769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001598088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004242394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040933234","doi":"10.7202/1009893ar","title":"Francophone Minority Communities: The Last Constitutional Standard-Bearers of Trudeau’s Language Regime","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"French; Charter; Politics; Political science; Context (archaeology); Law; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Ideology; Constitutional law; Sociology; Humanities; History","score_opus":0.04065114893639541,"score_gpt":0.3271317666016708,"score_spread":0.2864806176652754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040933234","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66820014,0.06221861,0.00012830294,0.03100693,0.0116962725,0.0002521915,0.00053262396,0.000018623243,0.22594628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948388,0.0029388207,0.00009191175,0.0004958435,0.0015350955,0.0000028991485,0.000002141354,0.00000230122,0.00009223475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984533,0.00013259226,0.0003320561,0.000041099564,0.00080196385,0.00023895573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978079,0.00038494484,0.00026194032,0.000064834276,0.0013234204,0.00015692016],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009563117,0.000088078545,0.00022794989,0.0003083687,0.0006218963,0.00002621311,0.00043833468,0.00003919097,0.00014059423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005397017,0.00006394751,0.000120361925,0.00029221622,0.0030949232,0.00025778415,0.000051348496,0.00018118117,0.000009203251],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010146731,0.00006216643,0.08616444,0.000008071761,0.0017993784,0.00004206006,0.11450923,0.000030715106,0.000031749558,0.7532604,0.038964894,0.0050254767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048519703,0.00004508737,0.027136099,0.0001327413,0.00005502559,0.00004270314,0.3540089,3.440026e-7,0.000068770496,0.0032278048,0.6146656,0.00013171123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1894334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.50351644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75003254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040774405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011785902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041010744","doi":"10.1353/cpp.2010.0012","title":"Not Quite Supreme: The Courts and Coordinate Constitutional Interpretation (review)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitution; Supreme court; Charter; Political science; Separation of powers; Interpretation (philosophy); Bill of rights; State (computer science); Politics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021624756444227154,"score_gpt":0.29789169152102507,"score_spread":0.2762669350767979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041010744","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021279652,0.003681424,0.000045498862,0.5468598,0.000912713,0.0004372945,0.00021173312,0.000044291042,0.4265276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97930944,0.0013348986,0.00000988378,0.018110873,0.0006102993,0.000028795945,0.000011299402,0.0000024418982,0.0005820474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910516,0.000068008376,0.00012452128,0.00013578533,0.00020217228,0.00036435094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991605,0.000096742944,0.00004321501,0.00009537359,0.00019347684,0.00041069047],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056995515,0.000079924954,0.000102299644,0.000115689996,0.0015608517,0.000103750805,0.00021362478,0.00005831578,0.00024729362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016655388,0.0000630109,0.00003637768,0.00024369275,0.0033702115,0.00021332323,0.000032361146,0.00018110046,0.000055605084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.235032e-7,0.0000025639224,0.0008028702,0.000003853112,0.000012047961,0.0000016331093,0.00031374206,6.580399e-8,0.000010605935,0.9689119,0.017929722,0.01201031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064799686,0.0000037607888,0.009737205,0.000028086974,0.0000107401665,0.000008677533,0.00013740832,0.000008547376,0.0000016848353,0.023849923,0.9660554,0.00009379421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4463609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7774775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9580298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015742255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060953917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042708466","doi":"10.1007/s10982-005-5881-x","title":"Civic Liberalism and the “Dialogical Model” of Judicial Review","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Philosophy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Liberalism; Philosophy of law; Epistemology; Indeterminate; Dialogical self; Distributive justice; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Sociology; Injustice; Distributive property; Political science; Classical liberalism; Law; Philosophy; Politics; Public law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03383339682363405,"score_gpt":0.2674164756806118,"score_spread":0.2335830788569777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042708466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005623432,0.035338286,0.000015292328,0.038145784,0.000063903324,0.00018469157,0.000011738723,0.000014568784,0.9206023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859444,0.008277659,0.000023542985,0.0052098976,0.000496197,0.000008140225,0.0000012757538,0.0000013831484,0.000037493945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948514,0.00006989914,0.00011954477,0.000087556335,0.00015017696,0.00008767983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99978024,0.000082651335,0.00003853526,0.000039268045,0.00003439294,0.000024943152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024646072,0.000052167466,0.00016812181,0.000005584135,0.00048505882,0.000011602164,0.000056218047,0.00003167197,0.000012018367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020421738,0.00003144503,0.00004062583,0.000062688676,0.0020077303,0.00004419286,0.000035398767,0.000047863,0.0000017392373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011151575,0.0000099762265,0.00008934994,0.000015984684,0.0000056407703,3.78837e-7,0.00019696855,0.0000013523521,0.0000018472708,0.9991889,0.00031201588,0.00016646052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019069742,0.000007988868,0.00015174312,0.000076572825,0.000028619683,3.984266e-7,0.000007981825,0.000007702283,0.0000012138248,0.97898096,0.020501705,0.000044434455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0080271475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011468114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.980321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000036096624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020938176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043497408","doi":"10.1089/1533129041492141","title":"Redefining Electoral Democracy in Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Politics; Election law; Download; Law; Dual (grammatical number); Computer science; Art; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.01686674110507267,"score_gpt":0.29101642207291584,"score_spread":0.27414968096784315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043497408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8090287,0.00074458134,0.000042799213,0.025386317,0.0004056542,0.00005957713,0.000008793648,0.000016456854,0.16430713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99671596,0.00056303176,0.00006519173,0.0015123328,0.0010595779,0.000001239465,7.1612976e-7,0.000003975658,0.000077966135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990401,0.000054451324,0.00018181045,0.00007925344,0.00022888248,0.00041548553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996124,0.000045437595,0.00005970135,0.000025613388,0.000079456506,0.00017739598],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017395963,0.000073130446,0.0001104541,0.00008210541,0.0019949765,0.00008274837,0.00006129627,0.00003518592,0.000015871863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015090649,0.00007106502,0.000025779362,0.00021841616,0.00018573536,0.0001259551,0.000014392116,0.00021888135,0.0000043358395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029689252,0.000008207522,0.00410081,8.982397e-7,0.000008445727,0.000011082726,0.00041277308,0.000029720408,0.000007721523,0.9940666,0.000113171816,0.0012376093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033355752,0.000037102644,0.016613947,0.00003341216,0.00000716046,0.00009042425,0.001025833,0.0000023705843,0.000049499602,0.8799885,0.10168279,0.00013538812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99808437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99733615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18768728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015593994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042756833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043543878","doi":"10.3200/socp.149.3.384-386","title":"Authoritarian Personality and Rape Sentence Length in Conservative and Liberal States","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University","funders":"","keywords":"Conservatism; Sentence; Authoritarianism; State (computer science); Psychology; Punishment (psychology); Wright; Homicide; Criminology; Social psychology; Political science; Law; Poison control; Suicide prevention; History; Mathematics; Politics; Philosophy; Medicine; Linguistics; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.04883111009689248,"score_gpt":0.37507920793558486,"score_spread":0.32624809783869235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043543878","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8731804,0.0010608643,0.000024703348,0.113693334,0.00014847425,0.000056312452,0.0000026993102,0.000003726308,0.011829499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99605346,0.0014393019,0.00004705057,0.0021358456,0.00027775005,3.193857e-7,1.3966007e-7,0.0000011385657,0.00004501337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990834,0.00037305296,0.00018064173,0.00006449822,0.00014545984,0.00015297443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995283,0.00018669355,0.0001255221,0.000019732937,0.00009741746,0.000042327676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001192738,0.000056217665,0.00016339641,0.000032082015,0.000599443,0.000015372223,0.00009601589,0.000054465054,0.000017334798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001045436,0.0000399884,0.000025619694,0.00012856726,0.001263807,0.0001114733,0.00001372129,0.0002125787,8.1928897e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00086478906,0.00024920303,0.08838594,0.0000035796334,0.00013418887,0.00003988499,0.29313418,0.0000015660231,0.00031965747,0.5781519,0.0070213214,0.031693794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003413892,0.0001050815,0.78062075,0.000007806148,0.000013895181,0.000014934405,0.01766455,7.747308e-7,7.8173144e-7,0.19813225,0.0030528952,0.000044894972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011007884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013564627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6922348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025801626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000072779905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46565497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044500382","doi":"10.7202/1018393ar","title":"How the Charter Has Failed Non-citizens in Canada: Reviewing Thirty Years of Supreme Court of Canada Jurisprudence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Human rights","score_opus":0.031017378010037153,"score_gpt":0.2320557403653359,"score_spread":0.20103836235529876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044500382","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7276403,0.0027743578,0.000023059032,0.09035488,0.0018752395,0.0007925119,0.00013769203,0.000008559481,0.17639343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991137,0.0003363012,0.000024291076,0.00035732536,0.00010507881,0.000004849919,2.1075661e-7,0.0000026760458,0.000055565764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986739,0.0001010597,0.00026185613,0.00007863494,0.00062186643,0.00026269048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993053,0.00011746096,0.00018172375,0.00007265734,0.00024127481,0.00008157638],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047729618,0.00006785228,0.00022517689,0.000014920292,0.0014217678,0.000031617838,0.00026671228,0.00002327386,0.00010993408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014523024,0.000047951748,0.000047461446,0.00014559535,0.00035243027,0.00014497788,0.000037194248,0.00018041595,0.0000010693524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006305807,0.00017837553,0.18482833,0.00016272618,0.00070560904,0.00040189008,0.012165339,0.00024807116,0.001101518,0.62032765,0.13978925,0.040028155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039749325,0.000029234,0.27229342,0.00048572922,0.000037452137,0.000013437333,0.011718788,0.000023453247,0.0002643985,0.00369344,0.7107904,0.000252769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99945813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99995863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61663425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042228732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011914906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044630453","doi":"10.1017/s0008423907070242","title":"Courts and Federalism: Judicial Doctrine in the United States, Australia, and Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Doctrine; Political science; Jurisprudence; Law; Separation of powers; Judicial review; Mainstream; Judicial opinion; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.034124745894655216,"score_gpt":0.3141141455929361,"score_spread":0.2799893996982809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044630453","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97441185,0.00008716747,0.00001105445,0.021902448,0.00020337441,0.000045389457,0.000007917137,8.476559e-7,0.0033299483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99719715,0.000015945187,0.000018256307,0.0025454708,0.00020208745,2.0132318e-7,2.7653323e-7,8.273345e-7,0.000019802983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985364,0.00004840947,0.00018190054,0.00007958888,0.0004362408,0.00071745133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99852467,0.00020376644,0.00004015453,0.000029841487,0.00017853836,0.0010230595],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021105953,0.000052131672,0.00009287257,0.00015801554,0.00097529445,0.00012026053,0.00021222814,0.00002374245,0.000018679446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007101042,0.00003721215,0.000010097406,0.00036924199,0.002976884,0.00012659396,0.000011435915,0.0001543609,3.4333377e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022566487,0.0000024988112,0.030504657,6.167509e-7,0.00000167542,0.0001833461,0.000981623,0.0000015163081,0.0000021347294,0.9675199,0.00062183454,0.00017797181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013111667,0.000033472035,0.90110373,0.00002024315,0.0000070921856,0.000070174596,0.008188338,0.0000030504925,0.000008017186,0.043865446,0.04648902,0.000080276885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99932307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92365444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048551324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004916821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044755740","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.1.75","title":"RETHINKING THE DICEYAN DIALECTIC","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Parliamentary sovereignty; Law; Constitution; Constitutional theory; Political science; Sovereignty; Parliament; Ideology; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03223350373744688,"score_gpt":0.23427174905547754,"score_spread":0.20203824531803066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044755740","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06975555,0.001858343,0.0002558006,0.00332316,0.00038024902,0.000049624192,0.0000013563391,0.000016470578,0.92435944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969191,0.0020738116,0.00014675903,0.000087076936,0.00024316745,1.1715016e-8,8.474713e-8,8.9858423e-7,0.0005291169],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994277,0.000099137134,0.000051499082,0.0000446626,0.00026321702,0.00011381794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966276,0.000071081326,0.00006894826,0.00003723458,0.00010875485,0.000051250718],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002744273,0.000032434913,0.00006834873,0.000004604069,0.005557493,0.000010196262,0.00021598124,0.000027267046,0.00048718075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040536837,0.000026528085,0.000069001966,0.000027000431,0.0011756677,0.0002417898,0.00003604706,0.00009506465,0.000006046182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002786372,0.000027182376,0.003708366,7.41315e-7,0.00006064436,0.000054791897,0.080875464,0.0000058913924,0.000018980609,0.91121435,0.0027462165,0.0012594914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039562993,0.000061356004,0.03140499,0.000035769357,0.00006341189,0.000060356346,0.044482466,0.0000032724836,0.00000800091,0.04885297,0.87449837,0.0001333954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37365347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5539768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92716354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000187906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013158502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99573714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045372520","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-121x.2001.tb00573.x","title":"History's living legacy: an outline of ‘modern’ historiography of the common law","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Historiography; Interpretation (philosophy); Politics; Principal (computer security); Law; Legal history; Sociology; Period (music); History; Social science; Political science; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05606189682910321,"score_gpt":0.3080389669174809,"score_spread":0.25197707008837766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045372520","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68124145,0.050758213,0.000014782289,0.0030326939,0.0024257873,0.00022023951,0.00000705441,0.0000630833,0.2622367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977488,0.00094317144,0.000026663229,0.00024538554,0.00034741822,0.000008803173,2.6477247e-7,0.0000043093437,0.0006752218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889135,0.00013233851,0.00024732164,0.00013887382,0.00040263645,0.00018746895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999286,0.00014335226,0.0001640961,0.00014403759,0.00022790341,0.00003461415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034329758,0.00009962668,0.00029890824,0.0000375806,0.0007207481,0.0000069531648,0.00026492926,0.00003909583,0.000021425514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013203952,0.00007167941,0.00014941549,0.00024037839,0.0024892509,0.00025164985,0.00012699369,0.00009437702,0.0000015849238],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023846123,0.00020045714,0.13679509,0.000014722004,0.00020416269,0.000002871623,0.032891158,0.000008104403,0.000175651,0.8254702,0.0023137403,0.0018999944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012572658,0.00009078864,0.066907175,0.00011010329,0.00009105901,7.1193926e-7,0.009120413,0.0000019436602,0.000041058694,0.014134316,0.90921396,0.00016272471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051642757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10036072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9069002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021266127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009252885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95467246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045876479","doi":"10.1080/14662043.2013.805540","title":"The courts/parliament trade-off: Canadian attitudes on judicial influence in public policy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth and Comparative Politics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Legislature; Politics; Political science; Public opinion; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.08721519710105317,"score_gpt":0.3573992294103896,"score_spread":0.2701840323093364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045876479","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7489296,0.0014717972,0.0000015986416,0.09160503,0.00014970002,0.00046730012,0.000022029706,0.000022188991,0.1573307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938176,0.0008587234,0.00000703705,0.0048108194,0.0003261059,0.000077393124,0.00000233908,0.000002832395,0.000097097865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998339,0.00022460349,0.00023858542,0.00016020531,0.00027747682,0.00076011795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987894,0.00039878645,0.00006340125,0.000108145956,0.00011119634,0.0005290679],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028782632,0.00012926255,0.00020373728,0.00011491346,0.0026766537,0.00022012432,0.00024746358,0.00005603421,0.000016370295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019557311,0.00009937226,0.000027468084,0.00024731015,0.0014680172,0.00015310664,0.00004115928,0.00021550371,0.000057356006],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027039246,0.000033157983,0.055344578,0.0000016835442,0.000010529485,0.0000010845177,0.0028853419,0.000006509953,3.4762184e-7,0.9373864,0.0022961032,0.0020315407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016865978,0.00006564399,0.6431636,0.000025356514,0.000003068945,5.754725e-7,0.004804137,0.000024119523,0.0000019067608,0.088233486,0.26337335,0.00013609308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.76599616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8141826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8491529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005179783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020244503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046189652","doi":"10.7202/1008310ar","title":"La judiciarisation des relations intergouvernementales au Mexique depuis 19941","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Politique et Sociétés","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10682089959739725,"score_gpt":0.43547742411129475,"score_spread":0.3286565245138975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046189652","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15203565,0.016119285,0.0021154634,0.03494891,0.004023644,0.0003240254,0.00010919189,0.00012904369,0.7901948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878686,0.005946647,0.00044915915,0.0009442496,0.0016492679,0.00007573169,0.000028460729,0.000019119954,0.0030187564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972701,0.0010209425,0.0003544345,0.00021011665,0.00035977372,0.0007846292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858665,0.0007460958,0.00016267777,0.00010949979,0.0001219697,0.0002731276],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014154055,0.00022420559,0.00024668028,0.000063442385,0.0014594317,0.000056395224,0.00017085203,0.0003324016,0.003042059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050465815,0.0002465275,0.00020091589,0.00029848653,0.0028715127,0.0009274133,0.0001302314,0.0003913641,0.00045378704],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004657705,0.00019779109,0.07799296,0.000017243738,0.000099041215,0.0000017959131,0.04220334,0.000004562828,0.000012864986,0.8682126,0.0043631066,0.006890078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023940005,0.00003272559,0.15695389,0.00021576253,0.00015868424,0.0000086337695,0.042335432,0.000007096769,0.0001260921,0.5512356,0.24832577,0.00036091034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18537901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04522726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83583295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020259402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063098216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046960392","doi":"10.1163/187633711x591530","title":"Law in the Egyptian Revolt","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Middle East Law and Governance","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Authoritarianism; Rule of law; Political science; Law; Constitution; Democracy; Power (physics); Politics","score_opus":0.05892931331691813,"score_gpt":0.24265997110957402,"score_spread":0.1837306577926559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046960392","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027116166,0.001978668,0.0000066464586,0.001995823,0.00012811142,0.00007945561,0.000009483073,0.000011953656,0.9686737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957557,0.00024754842,0.000034140437,0.0032893936,0.00014959289,0.000010007715,2.6242753e-7,0.000001623994,0.00051178236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994281,0.000047376056,0.00007631224,0.000107103835,0.00018089094,0.00016024744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99983495,0.000021519332,0.000033594937,0.00006315062,0.000019353784,0.000027406119],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021638733,0.0000521968,0.000071268594,0.0000026826951,0.0005139744,0.000021620364,0.00014233959,0.000028675513,0.000047117723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022216702,0.000036808695,0.00002175256,0.000090951304,0.00078312354,0.00011805341,0.000026286203,0.00006631506,0.000032628854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062840077,0.000023968296,0.0028745157,0.0000015664816,0.000002742334,0.0000063794696,0.00918212,5.9921945e-8,0.0000014386071,0.9873423,0.00017528285,0.00038337006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013368136,0.000017506396,0.04501119,0.00004396903,0.0000050892963,0.0000016142525,0.003176466,6.6480874e-7,0.0000060368757,0.09145609,0.86005116,0.00009655262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.113794774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25690535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9686395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017741266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024090352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89210653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047081947","doi":"10.7202/043305ar","title":"L'État de droit et la théorie de la rule of law","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.008198615666749681,"score_gpt":0.26885991770218626,"score_spread":0.2606613020354366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047081947","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37094033,0.0051376945,0.0023131294,0.008462912,0.00021144295,0.000099591096,0.00005507576,0.00004947131,0.6127303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822133,0.0022547871,0.0021408093,0.002155741,0.0005899494,0.000014909412,0.0000040180753,0.000013965189,0.01061248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998221,0.0004247905,0.00024070757,0.0002155423,0.00032905984,0.00056890096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884045,0.0006780082,0.000111595495,0.00011370612,0.000066369415,0.0001898517],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001256428,0.00015988325,0.00027435686,0.000038117243,0.0005942278,0.000056275763,0.00028130857,0.0004289003,0.00017944624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022380767,0.00019106054,0.00018191645,0.00025231103,0.005660378,0.00018462841,0.000053198015,0.00047973348,0.00006999346],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019699102,0.00012808887,0.0033734771,0.000020608833,0.00009401299,0.000036475732,0.009955399,0.0001813569,0.00012589757,0.96379554,0.0006579588,0.021611486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025173434,0.000029672658,0.0045923716,0.0000749484,0.0000873723,0.00002206157,0.0023259728,0.0000391382,0.0003314488,0.7296558,0.26239952,0.00018994165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014421065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004340253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.611273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010800904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050981826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99704564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050187962","doi":"10.1016/j.postcomstud.2010.10.006","title":"Authoritarian legality and informal practices: Judges, lawyers and the state in Russia and China","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communist and Post-Communist Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Principle of legality; Dilemma; China; Context (archaeology); State (computer science); Political science; Political economy; Order (exchange); Economic system; Law; Sociology; Politics; Democracy; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.03394272293597423,"score_gpt":0.3392140997298786,"score_spread":0.30527137679390437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050187962","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87927437,0.020726353,7.6142334e-7,0.03449373,0.00019982737,0.00026342587,0.000029260818,0.00003517278,0.064977124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9708571,0.028199002,0.00013743981,0.00047937152,0.00005710408,0.00002755795,0.0000068559016,0.0000056659983,0.00022989894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850565,0.00057376426,0.0002792901,0.00015383885,0.00018621553,0.00030121044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981466,0.0011687633,0.00019835435,0.0002880778,0.0001032443,0.00009497021],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023771073,0.00019990414,0.00039102073,0.000052167674,0.0074281935,0.00032753698,0.0002939625,0.00008136945,0.000004975589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00091765926,0.00013903144,0.000028578657,0.00014714098,0.0097141275,0.0004691868,0.0010997716,0.000794332,0.0000010688502],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027485454,0.000061593644,0.09680638,0.000054309676,0.00018735761,0.0000054429324,0.22073044,1.2292408e-7,0.000016773693,0.6644845,0.00015526172,0.017222965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016893514,0.0000930831,0.6740862,0.00007202249,0.000084616324,0.000018285667,0.15108338,0.000017366763,0.0000013306969,0.044847548,0.12767415,0.00033264305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13745132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34436855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61963695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018429759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000083702624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.993864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050516753","doi":"10.7202/1009064ar","title":"Le principe de proportionnalité dans une société démocratique égalitaire, pluraliste et multiculturelle","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03250964000714904,"score_gpt":0.3233638978373402,"score_spread":0.29085425783019114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050516753","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017720088,0.0068069636,0.0007567397,0.07152226,0.0030536135,0.00029046324,0.00009509255,0.00006379013,0.899691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98889035,0.0012014301,0.0008770323,0.0019522865,0.0021819093,0.00001892824,0.0000056592053,0.000016921886,0.0048555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969702,0.000729405,0.00055723765,0.00019590707,0.0006384398,0.0009088464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985761,0.0000980502,0.00035847348,0.00010361872,0.00035181118,0.0005119378],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018293901,0.0002513725,0.00032036286,0.000024647074,0.010801057,0.000105488034,0.0002584073,0.00023031308,0.00026203494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018559165,0.00021687499,0.000294502,0.00032588406,0.0017200866,0.0010540511,0.000099299265,0.00064084184,0.00014299559],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016629827,0.00039592833,0.0019792123,0.000016897886,0.00016260387,0.000031848176,0.0076978193,0.00009260594,0.00010079239,0.9865895,0.0015136126,0.0014025369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041705556,0.00005001698,0.0051505156,0.00013349425,0.00010782273,0.00025753168,0.013686965,0.000013152458,0.00031588157,0.0427071,0.9368403,0.0003201908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07003341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1117331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97117025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057673885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025191743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99048674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051792895","doi":"10.7202/042515ar","title":"La Charte canadienne des droits et libertés et quelques leçons tirées de la Convention européenne des droits de l'homme","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Human rights; Convention; Law; Constitution; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Commission","score_opus":0.014507424605128601,"score_gpt":0.2784979156196403,"score_spread":0.2639904910145117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051792895","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82399744,0.0009907677,0.0020361522,0.0030216766,0.00006943117,0.00013408231,0.00003136244,0.00017214139,0.16954698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99099624,0.0016808339,0.0012486397,0.0017691349,0.0002406462,0.00003942239,0.000013190446,0.00002396373,0.003987934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764764,0.00079275126,0.00023054477,0.0002789775,0.00022766626,0.0008223936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987875,0.0005415036,0.00009441265,0.000115672585,0.00011192773,0.00034894203],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019816442,0.00019795774,0.00023986102,0.00010589413,0.0012885953,0.00017128955,0.00027646509,0.00027972375,0.00008698625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069360604,0.00022040136,0.00013579277,0.000308627,0.0030793615,0.00035999835,0.000049501075,0.0004419416,0.00004129616],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019800182,0.00007854789,0.0064079827,0.000014951012,0.00007003783,0.000056211273,0.036257554,0.00003935626,0.00044171646,0.93679404,0.00037311652,0.019446673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043561176,0.00006271418,0.06515167,0.00016075029,0.000088711444,0.00007413429,0.0058118775,0.000051884646,0.0003558512,0.7231757,0.20422,0.00041110895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06559333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22843137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21361835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015154345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049585424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051885556","doi":"10.7202/1013035ar","title":"From the Backroom to the Front Line: Making Constitutional History or Encounters with the Constitution: Patriation, Meech Lake, and Charlottetown","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Negotiation; Front line; Commission; Constitutional amendment; Public administration; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04472068094413539,"score_gpt":0.27718608990713883,"score_spread":0.23246540896300344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051885556","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011066555,0.016970383,0.00852605,0.27393052,0.01022406,0.0016137097,0.0006488033,0.00013227771,0.67688763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98993886,0.0002376216,0.00019720437,0.005975157,0.0034500023,0.00002376987,0.000002854562,0.0000036712552,0.00017087028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983884,0.00025983562,0.00022400286,0.00014286538,0.000641558,0.000343355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886173,0.0004903183,0.00016053615,0.0001189763,0.00023939645,0.00012901962],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013531116,0.00014078035,0.00014832648,0.000018046298,0.011362547,0.000112428024,0.00032724335,0.000053855983,0.00070396805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002161175,0.00005809173,0.00006051311,0.00011657105,0.00340774,0.0003496507,0.00007871084,0.00031379514,0.000059686394],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000106901556,0.000026487678,0.0026420332,8.1689313e-7,0.00012180945,0.0000072966773,0.0053848284,0.00005079256,0.000003580324,0.9646397,0.02562294,0.0013927623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024859805,0.000026609643,0.002348312,0.00004991222,0.000078590216,0.000066124674,0.005816462,0.000002062501,0.0000030090243,0.0007427701,0.9905001,0.00011742921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046465555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14481841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9788723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032513367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022766904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053759395","doi":"10.1002/j.1538-165x.2006.tb00586.x","title":"The Canadian Supreme Court: Attitudinal Conflict in Right to Counsel Cases","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Politics; Law; Political science; Abortion; Supreme Court Decisions; Sociology","score_opus":0.02948901404579117,"score_gpt":0.3198903980472642,"score_spread":0.29040138400147303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053759395","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47873425,0.00014288137,0.000028000848,0.08194904,0.0006245358,0.00037089235,0.000035888395,0.00004616156,0.43806833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982584,0.000001954507,0.000022785824,0.000978949,0.00037271442,0.000023780616,6.589113e-7,0.0000022267602,0.0003385233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99711615,0.00006892673,0.00020063357,0.00025898742,0.0007901244,0.0015651806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986142,0.00032070698,0.000019502873,0.00011174983,0.00022778533,0.00070605305],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001265834,0.0000951765,0.00011404374,0.00011420752,0.0042223055,0.000379196,0.0004715705,0.00004330991,0.000064504035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003159323,0.00006848899,0.000034323704,0.00078373536,0.0045643924,0.00020896833,0.000010493524,0.000111676694,0.00023608631],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028930658,0.000017004772,0.0126489755,3.3440944e-7,0.000001158267,0.00003098097,0.0008657165,8.8641536e-7,0.000016330763,0.98517317,0.000861322,0.00038123227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001661457,0.00018863239,0.44679037,0.000023110239,0.000008726241,0.000013951801,0.006965884,0.00002366812,0.000033876277,0.20524436,0.3402277,0.00031355527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96467566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99182254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7799288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010105367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002331849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057118116","doi":"10.1017/s0008423901777943","title":"Attitudes, Precedents and Cultural Change: Explaining the Citation of Foreign Precedents by the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Charter; Politics; Convergence (economics); Law; Citation; Divergence (linguistics); Supreme Court Decisions; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.05870106828078635,"score_gpt":0.3180534359441576,"score_spread":0.2593523676633712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057118116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9747605,0.0005284857,0.000016882002,0.008800225,0.00027559986,0.00011885352,0.000024309073,9.894972e-7,0.015474166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994619,0.00004039692,0.000015666817,0.00029757645,0.00013082498,0.0000019531467,2.5643138e-7,0.0000012376998,0.000050176805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851334,0.00006802135,0.00021340259,0.00007370255,0.0006633521,0.00046815633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998711,0.0001694277,0.00012712162,0.000048632155,0.00045651337,0.0004872982],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010647719,0.00005373436,0.000108588894,0.000042191663,0.001029613,0.000052274183,0.00042413638,0.000021450709,0.000030412119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011572901,0.000030978044,0.000025645923,0.00034840507,0.0029811317,0.00027215653,0.00002228136,0.000089941015,2.0879897e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005588994,0.0000075768685,0.16607687,0.000003318573,0.000016041615,0.000004592791,0.00455587,0.0000036115757,0.00010670353,0.8266793,0.001676929,0.00086363166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016484204,0.00007018031,0.9570714,0.000104104955,0.000026194071,0.000034153352,0.026515229,0.000018229191,0.00019868626,0.0101132095,0.005590228,0.00009351864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94415784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9711254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81656605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033725842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032692063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057735419","doi":"10.1177/0010414008329897","title":"Ideological Consistency and Attitudinal Conf lict","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Political Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Supreme court; Voting; Consistency (knowledge bases); Politics; Law; Dimension (graph theory); Political science; Voting behavior; Sociology","score_opus":0.28807225174781226,"score_gpt":0.4644727991642816,"score_spread":0.17640054741646932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057735419","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31764773,0.021938179,0.000059307644,0.038240664,0.0002471718,0.00026321906,0.000009988767,0.00012306837,0.6214707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99709505,0.00026943217,0.00011412884,0.0019247286,0.000336037,0.000012703228,6.674529e-7,0.000001172327,0.00024607146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865973,0.00015581158,0.00020045816,0.00023809134,0.00024660406,0.0004992784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888515,0.00057107036,0.00003437417,0.0000540727,0.00025740196,0.00019790971],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021225742,0.00014099888,0.00040976555,0.000027425662,0.0014701888,0.000036035774,0.00009268287,0.000049759834,0.000044117645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005876756,0.00010651518,0.00005765485,0.0001275218,0.0048116096,0.000086137865,0.000073544026,0.000121717094,0.000063223386],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013970003,0.000053023614,0.013459685,0.000001760265,0.00005908036,0.0000084024705,0.0022520993,1.7115542e-7,0.000006654921,0.98190105,0.001955642,0.0002884376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030341276,0.0002630221,0.27548423,0.00003029317,0.00006122115,0.0000054225575,0.018712379,0.0000029284606,0.000039329272,0.65656567,0.048269622,0.00026249758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00058745535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044910825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67944735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009103979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007843456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060346115","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-4469.2003.tb00835.x","title":"American Legal History in Retrospect and Prospect: Reflections on the Twenty-fifth Anniversary of Morton Horwitz's Transformation of American Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Social Inquiry","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transformation (genetics); Law; History; Political science; Chemistry","score_opus":0.06019443142625305,"score_gpt":0.3308536081956588,"score_spread":0.27065917676940576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060346115","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6130657,0.000322496,0.00001990001,0.001929217,0.00027314984,0.0002646294,0.000011565019,0.000026278381,0.38408706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998853,0.00020424974,0.000030227557,0.0007032864,0.00014064487,0.00001526697,0.0000016271599,0.0000050640692,0.000046602283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988953,0.00020972913,0.00022753922,0.00014628135,0.0003253974,0.00019578703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995473,0.000081361955,0.00019334113,0.00006481954,0.00007927092,0.000033930548],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036877004,0.00009433931,0.00025378107,0.000033252287,0.00062266,0.000010501398,0.000094681505,0.00003897484,0.000030228772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046504432,0.0000818235,0.00007614989,0.00044358554,0.007430687,0.00017418551,0.000012225225,0.00015631944,0.0000014352914],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034789537,0.00007639518,0.001250206,0.000003734248,0.00002193651,0.0000010064753,0.043380424,0.0000020831374,0.00019364424,0.9544835,0.00021619395,0.00033607104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00090371526,0.0009380425,0.104126036,0.00008964276,0.00013145438,0.0000018709268,0.22801228,0.0000036359934,0.00086954585,0.084433414,0.57987756,0.0006128026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07616431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05217898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8700501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035572352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015222313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9952705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061494529","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.1.1","title":"ONCE MORE INTO THE FRAY: CHALLENGES FOR LEGAL POSITIVISM","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Legal positivism; Morality; Epistemology; Jurisprudence; Law; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Legal realism; Legal profession","score_opus":0.028825019273952368,"score_gpt":0.2572214584636875,"score_spread":0.22839643918973512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061494529","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07201466,0.021410037,0.002227802,0.042144805,0.0006269628,0.00024479665,0.000011006116,0.000034367324,0.86128557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916661,0.0068397042,0.0005674389,0.00010598089,0.00031731057,8.86278e-8,2.4689749e-7,0.000001466879,0.0005016903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994735,0.000052344254,0.000055283286,0.000065309476,0.00022441246,0.00012912629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999586,0.00008084145,0.000066762106,0.000039962146,0.00016992008,0.000056529207],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021425255,0.00004516795,0.00009209454,0.000005349005,0.004051209,0.000009937218,0.00021986404,0.000034587632,0.00007623811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023945542,0.000037525453,0.00009406145,0.000014169844,0.0010777281,0.00033173812,0.000036545785,0.00006685713,0.0000018817343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054523334,0.00003462389,0.0001747228,0.0000019116815,0.0000711403,0.000025927311,0.07178988,0.00000689309,0.000020399864,0.9182692,0.0012413585,0.008309379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031203456,0.00006986794,0.008022541,0.000023741533,0.000030615174,0.000016486885,0.09208778,0.0000057640464,0.000010512825,0.005532461,0.89380455,0.00008363769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23624626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39164692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9196514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018048065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013240607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061848164","doi":"10.2307/840922","title":"The Forms and Limits of Constitutional Interpretation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional interpretation; Constitutional law; Law; Philosophy; Classics; Political science; Sociology; History; Linguistics","score_opus":0.044316231671212326,"score_gpt":0.35308263258337413,"score_spread":0.3087664009121618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061848164","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90471166,0.0012102819,0.0019494764,0.005592635,0.00011552763,0.000066949215,0.0000019041673,0.0000029062917,0.08634867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99896514,0.00063392543,0.000049932398,0.00022691587,0.00009682638,0.0000011191266,8.849685e-8,6.0111563e-7,0.000025469806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992981,0.00015422303,0.0001906756,0.000032483083,0.0002378611,0.000086646156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875,0.0005697934,0.00034908636,0.00003195996,0.00026671943,0.000032479224],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048568577,0.00004286882,0.00016127588,0.000014045683,0.0007383273,0.000024278695,0.00014554446,0.0000056531176,0.000005461595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028593146,0.000020648959,0.000045817353,0.0001513129,0.011156924,0.00011812312,0.000015522732,0.00008036354,0.0000018984946],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018296942,0.000011864502,0.0013228194,1.8965929e-7,0.000059029036,8.248694e-7,0.0046003186,0.00003363614,0.00003920631,0.98975444,0.00010091818,0.0038938029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041857682,0.00069849606,0.030001882,0.00008955448,0.000082560924,0.000083541156,0.06821463,0.00006236447,0.00020470697,0.75665486,0.14335026,0.00013854823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027644204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080553314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23309954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002201975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012116602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9915341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062288157","doi":"10.7202/040226ar","title":"La controverse doctrinale sur la légitimité du juge constitutionnel canadien","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Politique et Sociétés","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.06252283157294539,"score_gpt":0.35901669739829073,"score_spread":0.2964938658253453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062288157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06971601,0.0059987,0.00013010693,0.07097001,0.002628191,0.00035516566,0.00041006217,0.000119597506,0.84967214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96736133,0.018610464,0.00006409936,0.0024825067,0.001212503,0.000063595166,0.000014461265,0.000014526312,0.010176494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969665,0.0009967803,0.00037073763,0.0003722634,0.0004540087,0.0008397396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99730515,0.001660644,0.00015359269,0.00015254565,0.0003255709,0.00040247693],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008567129,0.00030118183,0.00045573016,0.00006335496,0.001673051,0.000062294625,0.0002689437,0.00038120965,0.002173286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010603255,0.00033083075,0.00028685658,0.0002988135,0.0067961314,0.0005167276,0.00010734186,0.0005028353,0.00025549045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016561618,0.00016164192,0.006307932,0.000016822098,0.00013976419,0.000565723,0.005727538,0.000017054546,0.0000036406454,0.9517416,0.034641165,0.00066060206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095189316,0.00004181005,0.009307225,0.000100142875,0.00009021689,0.00030550302,0.0045288093,0.00001015752,0.000017528322,0.10264738,0.8815926,0.000406749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.421044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05465008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89764535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007772871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026409226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064898042","doi":"10.1080/02722010409481209","title":"Government Use of Strategic Litigation: The Alberta Exported Gas Tax Reference","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Review of Canadian Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Political science","score_opus":0.1429663668457873,"score_gpt":0.3336447276803028,"score_spread":0.19067836083451548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064898042","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29176366,0.29977298,0.0000038324383,0.20756926,0.00025991446,0.0014737443,0.00021411871,0.000019436722,0.19892307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7412482,0.25609967,0.000029928013,0.0023978003,0.000047725163,0.00003081166,0.000001003182,0.0000023572688,0.00014248965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987804,0.00015221412,0.00029076208,0.00011016233,0.00045595155,0.00021048522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988078,0.0003197232,0.00035880101,0.0001957143,0.0002413742,0.000076596974],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042666358,0.00009617394,0.0003623965,0.000024139164,0.00057793065,0.0000098550845,0.0002611897,0.0000094312545,0.000027762884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005686606,0.000052834996,0.000077009296,0.00080411206,0.0035364046,0.000057063033,0.000039779436,0.00006855679,0.000008061109],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006604543,0.000017369666,0.0010368301,0.00014879253,0.00033199403,0.0000029161336,0.0052320273,0.00000777862,0.000008924163,0.978071,0.0045998413,0.010535965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016307557,0.00019573672,0.02129748,0.0044071386,0.00040602728,0.000003522121,0.08127071,3.0939046e-7,0.000049378268,0.051822856,0.8400554,0.00032835332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85601056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90890646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9262481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019737355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007067883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99917537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066003064","doi":"10.1177/0010414001034010004","title":"A Tool, Not a Master","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Political Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil liberties; Globalization; Political science; Law; Human rights; Indigenous; Compliance (psychology); Law and economics; Economics; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.368946249640585,"score_gpt":0.45006990200393043,"score_spread":0.08112365236334546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066003064","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31794745,0.0021659783,0.00013597879,0.025697414,0.00036207438,0.00019421495,0.000008876192,0.000097588316,0.6533904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99496883,0.00017543141,0.000081609265,0.0020089531,0.00064141816,0.00004389906,5.277254e-7,0.0000025046365,0.0020767984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860984,0.000127073,0.00018192969,0.00019145751,0.0003232483,0.00056643254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999084,0.00043845177,0.000027371347,0.000067239765,0.00026091732,0.00012201346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019043311,0.00012123761,0.00030331925,0.000030461993,0.001138434,0.000035719655,0.00012168,0.000033881915,0.0001524847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037206127,0.00009580098,0.00007564434,0.00019809415,0.0022569587,0.00008116528,0.00011290096,0.00009158842,0.0004942102],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022576933,0.000043323857,0.007673917,0.0000016129892,0.00010147973,0.000009837848,0.005635157,5.633574e-7,0.000005904666,0.9828609,0.003417379,0.00022732504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003407583,0.000078709156,0.040750887,0.000040978615,0.00005049334,0.0000033843962,0.057648305,0.000006957832,0.00006996416,0.32223684,0.57844037,0.00033233696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011387448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015468785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6770214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016123784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000079003206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87560296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066171565","doi":"10.7202/042912ar","title":"À la recherche du temps perdu: la Cour suprême et l'interprétation des droits linguistiques constitutionnels dans les années 80","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitution; Interpretation (philosophy); Charter; Law; Political science; Bill of rights; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06661990094580147,"score_gpt":0.3486172626623727,"score_spread":0.2819973617165712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066171565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5915982,0.0007016635,0.017778656,0.0023699042,0.00010305086,0.00015142835,0.0000285421,0.00020354707,0.387065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917723,0.0014836933,0.0045921872,0.00035448838,0.0004947792,0.000031833857,0.000010815416,0.000011566473,0.0012483306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802697,0.0008712043,0.00023094552,0.00024814022,0.00028924772,0.00033349666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99806446,0.0014000289,0.00008921554,0.000088414876,0.00023145248,0.00012642573],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021805866,0.00016264633,0.00019716885,0.00007562891,0.0014957178,0.00014539792,0.00023170761,0.0004373417,0.000053719137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004093549,0.00016716571,0.00010942215,0.00022721343,0.004287863,0.00023230465,0.000034176606,0.0005382233,0.000035956287],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020313206,0.000059660004,0.012794888,0.000009186866,0.00004165672,0.000021207776,0.08824298,0.00009162836,0.00018247028,0.88383555,0.00024214735,0.014458323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005132935,0.000065778295,0.024035983,0.00027733934,0.000107758446,0.000058491292,0.08322516,0.00013294638,0.0006639756,0.37833014,0.512002,0.00058716524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013933756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042615283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5117598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012846574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005305977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067307616","doi":"10.1017/s000842390404003x","title":"The Changing Nature of Public Support for the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Institution; Public support; Political science; Politics; Democracy; Test (biology); Majority opinion; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.025834325083561864,"score_gpt":0.28534543930109324,"score_spread":0.25951111421753137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067307616","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44008422,0.0030957207,0.0013061861,0.49350685,0.005033874,0.00056186644,0.0002003239,0.000005348041,0.056205593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99907047,0.0000118474645,0.000038149374,0.00057960796,0.00023552304,0.0000011688392,7.732644e-8,0.0000013196942,0.00006184171],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828357,0.000023564911,0.0002139258,0.000059795417,0.00060246926,0.0008166842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99793977,0.00037550085,0.00010982092,0.00006618524,0.00084288645,0.0006658567],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024050975,0.00004453093,0.000104035855,0.00007382995,0.0020433606,0.00004984102,0.00068573887,0.000031725693,0.000019732464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037109123,0.000025042156,0.000058455447,0.0005173379,0.0042587915,0.00012633734,0.000017927749,0.00013755058,1.938744e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011324098,0.0000022884815,0.0010911952,0.0000011712904,0.000007969971,0.0000027550866,0.000515029,0.000007970372,0.000013038613,0.9976794,0.00039638995,0.00028163352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059158524,0.00025325295,0.22293913,0.00013646395,0.00008220774,0.000060834154,0.07561417,0.000025231324,0.0016727371,0.3887691,0.30955625,0.00029905417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8815417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98927295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6089103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065530697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04071462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99925584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067878026","doi":"10.1111/1541-0072.00032","title":"Judicial Review of Agency Interpretation of Statutes: Deference Doctrines in Comparative Perspective","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy Studies Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Statute; Agency (philosophy); Judicial deference; Political science; Discretion; Law; Judicial review; Interpretation (philosophy); Autonomy; Judicial discretion; Statutory interpretation; Law and economics; Sociology; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12648734671166678,"score_gpt":0.46889211680343323,"score_spread":0.34240477009176645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067878026","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10235777,0.41541114,0.00036429678,0.007885929,0.0006653159,0.0005691371,0.000027832439,0.000015464544,0.4727031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8593919,0.1401402,0.00011318902,0.00018084094,0.00014189696,0.000006768205,1.4913121e-7,0.0000014925155,0.000023523826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998518,0.00036791663,0.00046711735,0.00009945678,0.0003458317,0.00020168626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982567,0.00026783283,0.00035272702,0.00004287304,0.0010357231,0.000044168442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007967555,0.00009437909,0.0004551529,0.00016192856,0.00030912878,0.0000066921225,0.00012022896,0.000022296606,0.000033980177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003932269,0.000077338234,0.00009917273,0.0006662956,0.00090152345,0.00014269755,0.000030563882,0.00014153656,0.000002766643],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030562656,0.00007915012,0.0054217237,0.00012613603,0.00019044141,0.0000029518337,0.104258835,0.000009566207,0.000013031821,0.88761306,0.0006971814,0.0015573467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007494627,0.00028166085,0.025399111,0.008088654,0.00014406793,0.000012841774,0.23321402,0.0000028946445,0.00018334456,0.7216066,0.009998547,0.00031880624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004663743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003582055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7570342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028708667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068420003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7050215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069708965","doi":"10.1089/1533129041492123","title":"Redistricting: What the United States Can Learn from Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redistricting; Politics; Election law; Political science; Download; Law; Public administration; Computer science; World Wide Web; Democracy","score_opus":0.017019001621895898,"score_gpt":0.279834973714024,"score_spread":0.2628159720921281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069708965","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8464618,0.0010767299,0.000033624085,0.13046831,0.00070444564,0.00006560481,0.000059927403,0.000022436045,0.021107119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98779386,0.005047049,0.000009555008,0.0048743896,0.0021247189,0.0000013608532,0.000012424196,0.000004158045,0.00013245552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990838,0.0000850011,0.00014799296,0.000076679076,0.00028170884,0.00032483033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994046,0.0001265951,0.0000798629,0.000039719205,0.0001649685,0.00018425458],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015313039,0.00007840038,0.000085673055,0.00004740704,0.004477111,0.00036364456,0.00009411753,0.000036736696,0.000014963434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016153562,0.000057356054,0.000029514891,0.0002559726,0.000418931,0.00013159655,0.000019980513,0.00022260808,0.0000019106662],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002606135,0.000007860262,0.00018628725,5.0999057e-7,0.00003294095,0.0000047262038,0.002432801,0.00007190588,0.0000034855925,0.99569565,0.00051301176,0.0010482298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014142199,0.000025558902,0.0014909178,0.000021576709,0.000016505763,0.000020837011,0.012800854,0.0000026084465,0.000052887855,0.4776522,0.50769466,0.00007998694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9979779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9819361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51804346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005734551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014550455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968189},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069887854","doi":"10.7202/042321ar","title":"The Canadian Constitutional Tradition : A Brief Glimpse from an American Point of View","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Ethnology; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.013875786161759525,"score_gpt":0.2499112488208578,"score_spread":0.23603546265909828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069887854","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6494298,0.025374291,0.0026265678,0.14779735,0.0015100474,0.00051343883,0.0016358626,0.00006202426,0.17105064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99364984,0.0016127164,0.0004504698,0.0026357702,0.0009796865,0.000016274484,0.00003724682,0.0000051731236,0.0006128228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847996,0.00021395556,0.000274631,0.00021646492,0.00035760622,0.00045738692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998979,0.00025573242,0.00014835605,0.00012818063,0.00012064444,0.00036811622],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044454678,0.00013963856,0.00022932734,0.00004378406,0.0023797366,0.00006912067,0.00026337456,0.00014583234,0.00021750142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015018537,0.00013319934,0.0001284535,0.00036176754,0.021615291,0.00022494554,0.000011715777,0.0002998156,0.000050085353],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013196184,0.000043865693,0.00069702434,0.0000021197247,0.000076302684,0.000008517849,0.004108961,0.00004648237,0.000008321404,0.84435695,0.0008095417,0.14982873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001984511,0.00007972112,0.021807184,0.0000680209,0.00010655006,0.0000104611345,0.0068224426,0.00011072686,0.000027604825,0.23820776,0.73233944,0.00022163826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85470134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9500074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7315299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023889893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019176555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070840899","doi":"10.14296/ac.v2008i75.1175","title":"Constitutionalism: an idea whose time has come ... and gone?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Amicus Curiae","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Adjudication; Law; Political science; Legal history; Jurisprudence; Politics; Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.047329643507523673,"score_gpt":0.28578431990531883,"score_spread":0.23845467639779516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070840899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8128565,0.0016558027,0.000057145866,0.006394965,0.0004333131,0.00022039896,0.000055538676,0.00016512156,0.1781612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975248,0.00042683608,0.00011522649,0.0005565341,0.00044095435,0.000009652272,0.000014144077,0.0000039006027,0.0009079827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902797,0.00008664333,0.00014676373,0.00020740149,0.00028363848,0.0002475664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995364,0.000092170725,0.0000470297,0.00008618428,0.000103126345,0.00013507954],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022191177,0.00010197638,0.00016623962,0.00003855957,0.002214209,0.000051304134,0.00013233205,0.00006894678,0.00020778387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000115802126,0.000095031355,0.000038718226,0.00015620638,0.003697174,0.00029188546,0.000054782577,0.00008245453,0.0003179249],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013101161,0.00006978472,0.014633802,0.0000012317886,0.000029787949,0.00003767745,0.0032046647,0.0000033496344,0.0001947759,0.97518027,0.0059649944,0.0006665488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006326025,0.000066812085,0.06789949,0.000029304449,0.000037414975,0.00006286195,0.00101308,0.000026573583,0.00003862685,0.07326115,0.8565083,0.0004237518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008989123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017528023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9019191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050601215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003300403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072071894","doi":"10.1017/s1049096506061014","title":"Is Canada a Westminster or Consensus Democracy? A Brief Analysis","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PS Political Science & Politics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Constitution; Federalism; Political science; Polity; Charter; Democracy; Law; Devolution (biology); Government (linguistics); Public administration; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.029293147564141964,"score_gpt":0.32308169371855144,"score_spread":0.29378854615440947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072071894","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42568567,0.00006869275,0.00013023862,0.054586,0.00045307277,0.00019782422,0.0002119598,0.00008400566,0.5185825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98685086,0.0000040448276,0.00022235498,0.00867244,0.00064535503,0.0000065473605,0.000002935926,0.00000515803,0.0035902986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953613,0.00008103397,0.000381287,0.00044793796,0.0015018218,0.0022266111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99790037,0.0004341036,0.00006737161,0.0002236697,0.00046630416,0.00090820825],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005590084,0.00017876465,0.00031252144,0.00017393047,0.002665963,0.00019259665,0.000492391,0.000073027535,0.0003867788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010745189,0.00014540044,0.00012838806,0.0017991952,0.0068978337,0.00013421309,0.00013048833,0.00014032234,0.00003400701],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031541956,0.00004171457,0.04454468,0.0000019440731,0.000031898562,0.000032334316,0.00020304743,0.000003833238,0.000008358095,0.9525453,0.0025314253,0.000052311738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035498806,0.00006294233,0.30595464,0.000022969369,0.0005540493,0.000018940858,0.005117588,0.00030196132,0.000364791,0.4268616,0.2596324,0.00075312925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.984353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9411217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5611652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014589959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010133561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99863243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072321851","doi":"10.3138/cjls.27.2.169","title":"The Judicialization of Assisted Reproductive Technology Policy in Canada: Decentralization, Medicalization, and Mandatory Regulation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Decentralization; Federalism; Medicalization; Political science; Public administration; State (computer science); Reproduction; Government (linguistics); Morality; Public policy; Politics; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.013416792544901097,"score_gpt":0.2601561464215502,"score_spread":0.2467393538766491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072321851","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92834395,0.0133032575,0.0005897192,0.04425811,0.0013281369,0.00041279566,0.000055494325,0.000009721025,0.011698802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971197,0.0017903596,0.000041666106,0.0006645434,0.00031909018,0.0000029326234,0.000005076528,0.000005621713,0.000050965846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890864,0.00011605713,0.00037098155,0.00010323543,0.00013093704,0.000370176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987049,0.000121790836,0.00028264223,0.00007278365,0.00042969256,0.00038816404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011458502,0.00007742128,0.00020384642,0.00007558251,0.0008995563,0.000022328186,0.000109719644,0.000101765545,0.000010702064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009910058,0.000073159536,0.00003822542,0.0004922014,0.0011569841,0.00021041183,0.000012230668,0.0001316288,5.6912846e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002465356,0.0000041568924,0.044101845,0.000008248567,0.00004006747,0.0000018930991,0.015038236,0.000012233597,0.0000051871725,0.9385644,0.00054556184,0.0016756749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083705114,0.000049027,0.4143316,0.00026947228,0.00012360276,0.000078982746,0.11135002,0.000053821965,0.00003671464,0.20349675,0.26901475,0.00035821885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97304595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73506767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015449594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005952249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072706969","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.1.109","title":"DEMOCRATIC OBJECTIONS TO STRUCTURAL JUDICIAL REVIEW AND THE JUDICIAL ROLE IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Federalism; Law; Judicial activism; Political science; Constitution; Judicial independence; Separation of powers; Democracy; Legislature; Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Judicial interpretation; Constitutional law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.007300103575219185,"score_gpt":0.24305011294563528,"score_spread":0.2357500093704161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072706969","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03755223,0.009220584,0.00013827583,0.017507995,0.0010879149,0.0005041147,0.000029104625,0.000020739124,0.93393904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970231,0.001577023,0.00023849214,0.0007950681,0.00030200605,2.7564985e-7,5.5796136e-7,0.000001126051,0.00006236728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992218,0.00012520597,0.00013974738,0.00009403884,0.0002554023,0.00016382537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999505,0.000090894966,0.00008398812,0.0000486035,0.00016112678,0.0001104072],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051604176,0.00006693283,0.0002046866,0.000014054641,0.0027599933,0.000024584955,0.00019322384,0.000047609556,0.00055651093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000113231144,0.000056049572,0.00007135441,0.00006352311,0.004205173,0.00029684612,0.00006640484,0.00022156649,0.000004280392],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045475368,0.000010306204,0.0005399073,0.000003181437,0.000025315614,0.0000046034093,0.0018750813,0.000003539376,0.000019449159,0.99652386,0.00046443223,0.00048486725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037180944,0.00012256127,0.028597336,0.0004725888,0.00056702975,0.00015767511,0.026178624,0.000020800857,0.000009707395,0.4190515,0.52059275,0.0005113486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34341288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8937054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95947087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012621112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023157994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99853826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W20727553","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1019","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada and Constitutional (Equality) Baselines","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Constitution; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Formalism (music); Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional law; Scope (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.026473460672530428,"score_gpt":0.26302658507276094,"score_spread":0.23655312440023052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W20727553","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010619582,0.0021948158,0.00055767683,0.02298655,0.0008165637,0.00015158825,0.000022140264,0.000011289305,0.9626398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998403,0.0004847233,0.00009380924,0.0003323473,0.00034972033,0.0000041038415,5.308075e-7,0.0000014893321,0.00033029253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887395,0.00012423735,0.00023155354,0.00007160981,0.0004709045,0.000227757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990499,0.0002769809,0.00010676831,0.00004561483,0.00038877802,0.00013192777],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006592884,0.000064686115,0.00011282666,0.000010701422,0.0029409227,0.00009261176,0.00014537957,0.000029800402,0.00016947673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023153659,0.0000426175,0.00003477142,0.00006683717,0.004009803,0.00015217936,0.00003305891,0.00012287429,0.0000037853556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042417855,0.000009486456,0.0033504434,0.0000012831999,0.000029899948,0.0000028623024,0.00010131964,0.00000761152,0.000019001214,0.99126804,0.004593333,0.0006124934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030197427,0.000022341013,0.005933469,0.000047103633,0.000025938767,0.00004407881,0.0033537531,0.000017404735,0.00005542848,0.7001514,0.28988218,0.0001649613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9628537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9946461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9877834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007086511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010838961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99870074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073883360","doi":"10.1080/03050710701747328","title":"Change of Political Allegiance in Parliamentary Life","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament","funders":"","keywords":"Allegiance; Parliament; House of Commons; Politics; Law; Constitution; Political science; Conscience; Parliamentary sovereignty; Sociology","score_opus":0.0683611379097948,"score_gpt":0.3400177201564915,"score_spread":0.2716565822466967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073883360","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15882836,0.0047722533,0.00006943652,0.12555964,0.00061794836,0.00057671574,0.0000218738,0.000068774934,0.709485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98856634,0.00022843808,0.00014005962,0.01059718,0.00040966825,0.000015167022,0.0000021079115,0.0000037903917,0.00003722435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872005,0.000099028235,0.00027910608,0.00012860922,0.00027791015,0.0004952755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993504,0.00024531592,0.00006260841,0.00008501314,0.00005054427,0.00020609454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095396163,0.00007198324,0.00018822514,0.000034210523,0.00028161993,0.0000066222797,0.00017107383,0.00006325935,0.0002759856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000121499346,0.000072499584,0.00003909762,0.00014993566,0.0008918106,0.000031030788,0.00006198026,0.00012504312,0.000070228736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030586678,0.00008583815,0.024246272,0.000008629782,0.000004806015,0.0000089382875,0.0011934282,1.3360814e-7,0.0000013150416,0.9708027,0.0021552718,0.0014620796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026545717,0.00003885029,0.08399222,0.00006539031,0.00000405754,2.9817713e-7,0.0058085844,3.2088997e-7,0.000015063928,0.011153323,0.8985489,0.000107550615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2551026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10775455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9596494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001133653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000097924836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9085266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075506508","doi":"10.1093/pa/53.2.328","title":"The encroachment of the law on politics","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"PricewaterhouseCoopers (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.016117836920532803,"score_gpt":0.26485079145478935,"score_spread":0.24873295453425653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075506508","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.116965294,0.0003584158,6.2680687e-7,0.015875403,0.00032836339,0.00017217823,0.000014891046,0.000015098147,0.8662697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99716663,0.00036904815,0.000008288636,0.00087920204,0.00018227086,0.000011571038,6.136567e-7,0.0000019247425,0.0013804464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916476,0.00009474137,0.00011440381,0.00008179099,0.00034693128,0.00019738013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966955,0.00013118333,0.000031618027,0.00011637331,0.000016274513,0.00003502847],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019098197,0.000055939377,0.00006323152,0.00000453027,0.0016802775,0.000019046638,0.00024012136,0.000018412778,0.00032968365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001282655,0.000030439924,0.00006752223,0.000089293266,0.0013263655,0.000036303703,0.000028223913,0.000060598566,0.00006212189],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009737115,0.000045881712,0.0017887775,6.6983426e-7,0.000028353037,4.1349347e-7,0.0023136127,0.000020345306,0.000003923353,0.9893499,0.0026657926,0.0037725808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015592355,0.00005057667,0.0046380106,0.000029373667,0.000026332847,3.5641966e-7,0.045978658,0.000002176949,0.00039534035,0.0721209,0.8765029,0.00009947355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019466901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00942269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.917229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000782899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000061101644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077417931","doi":"10.1353/cpp.2011.0015","title":"The Politics of the Charter: The Illusive Promise of Constitutional Rights (review)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Politics; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04035810089549507,"score_gpt":0.27262374017198576,"score_spread":0.2322656392764907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077417931","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065583372,0.008393133,0.000003428775,0.14463186,0.000509876,0.000690065,0.00028272814,0.000010980967,0.8389196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947501,0.0010492268,0.0000030181861,0.0028891119,0.00034086447,0.000026966945,0.000001268757,0.0000017262944,0.0009377219],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989036,0.0001457758,0.00020532106,0.0000837726,0.00028253967,0.00037900623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900675,0.00010653689,0.00012810805,0.0002087651,0.00034346068,0.00020637234],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000435267,0.00007309874,0.0001207584,0.000050265466,0.002558765,0.000014212387,0.00064331194,0.000040458868,0.00013066265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008847973,0.00003480132,0.0001028977,0.00045084086,0.008448635,0.00007049103,0.000050679893,0.00008949467,0.0000144497235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.7616055e-7,0.000007033179,0.0006527154,0.000004594306,0.000030378731,3.81955e-7,0.0013847408,1.8575488e-8,6.09581e-7,0.9856688,0.011536603,0.00071366783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000550209,0.0000060380517,0.009689825,0.00005183022,0.000017967912,0.000002394166,0.0005445743,3.4505047e-7,0.00001261128,0.11424775,0.8753174,0.000054254266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6723377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.65592134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9881918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020373974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010527295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W207812142","doi":"","title":"Les tribunaux administratifs au Canada. Procédure et preuve (Y.Ouellette).","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geology","score_opus":0.03129778592517801,"score_gpt":0.28085108076064397,"score_spread":0.24955329483546596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W207812142","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.260276,0.0076727173,0.00019610318,0.11413831,0.0017079798,0.00050250394,0.0002163565,0.00007333695,0.6152167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9616139,0.0021637299,0.00012902863,0.001517823,0.0025182413,0.000052694184,0.00002682441,0.00001692718,0.031960823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765307,0.00022171841,0.00038506626,0.0004078682,0.00045748838,0.00087481906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989186,0.00023309703,0.00017066083,0.00018795196,0.00017987743,0.00030981892],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047572103,0.00021215338,0.00038182674,0.000035051526,0.0010978264,0.00007334131,0.000364239,0.00025854982,0.00058228057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038056436,0.00030647632,0.00014842507,0.00056701264,0.0007894827,0.00020862136,0.00007302593,0.00041182016,0.00010481325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043501197,0.00018927448,0.03605294,0.00011273053,0.0001423607,0.0005328814,0.005063575,0.00010169408,0.000019366085,0.9163304,0.02371584,0.017695421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000276323,0.00008355074,0.0280589,0.00032884537,0.00011454445,0.00011491014,0.003072129,0.000034503846,0.00002787562,0.038616717,0.92882526,0.00044641452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91075003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9882623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90510947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024149157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062584067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080505803","doi":"10.1089/elj.2005.4.57","title":"It's a Game that Anyone Can Play: Election Laws Around the World Louis Massicotte , André Blais , and Antoine Yoshinaka . Establishing the Rules of the Game: Election Laws in Democracies. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2004, 191 pp., $50 hardcover/$ 19.95 paperback.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.013052752536410302,"score_gpt":0.2599943451113658,"score_spread":0.24694159257495552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080505803","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6323413,0.14081831,0.00016220442,0.080827594,0.0012305195,0.0011924197,0.00032272586,0.00008216594,0.14302275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9289931,0.06794825,0.000030126013,0.0007715006,0.0011876185,0.0000026911728,0.00000291872,0.000010121122,0.0010536391],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980898,0.00039016976,0.00033781663,0.00020414863,0.00048140442,0.0004966631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988565,0.00028374718,0.0003802654,0.0001413462,0.00019557407,0.00014260037],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007206156,0.00019810241,0.00028289875,0.000019921315,0.0025493018,0.0002926507,0.00025299832,0.000110906236,0.00005928727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018011045,0.00013354637,0.00011682547,0.00020588328,0.0010949662,0.0008336592,0.00008646256,0.00038178265,6.3793055e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020341788,0.00020064642,0.008688708,0.000036107973,0.00025615504,0.000003370032,0.014412869,0.0002341168,0.00052414316,0.94173986,0.020577932,0.013122663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060459814,0.00011871794,0.029940173,0.00011585761,0.00010811148,0.00007538895,0.0046001007,0.00013653233,0.00029103883,0.023458533,0.9403316,0.00021939892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6787653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8864684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9197536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095994805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041771933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99874926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080696380","doi":"10.1080/0098261x.2014.989791","title":"High Court Recruitment of Female Clerks: A Comparative Analysis of the U.S. Supreme Court and the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Justice System Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Economic Justice; Ideology; Law; Political science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.09533321071398417,"score_gpt":0.32172325096918397,"score_spread":0.22639004025519982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080696380","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95583993,0.0044894824,0.00038495503,0.008477621,0.0021193726,0.0009869012,0.000212427,0.000010261402,0.027479075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99939984,0.00014761674,0.000055471242,0.000054143024,0.00022344493,0.00001038902,8.83831e-7,0.0000025785841,0.00010560914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970212,0.00068423763,0.00065932807,0.00011927208,0.001289106,0.00022683985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99722105,0.000493255,0.00083817716,0.0001502572,0.0011585484,0.00013869692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002633096,0.00011904777,0.00069356,0.00006834935,0.0007223789,0.000028433062,0.00036027218,0.00004935247,0.00001848542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033115494,0.00006576148,0.00016278075,0.0005972281,0.0011579491,0.000081369246,0.00008305697,0.00016359781,4.8910124e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00094274385,0.00026926436,0.066919334,0.00035177657,0.0092469035,0.000021560725,0.10587528,0.014098088,0.00013900628,0.7720331,0.02989782,0.00020512573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003494793,0.00019209355,0.106158115,0.0008537601,0.015228116,0.00004350899,0.8568964,0.0022234153,0.00025099205,0.001756485,0.012536437,0.00036588171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40642884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.501175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7702766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003650399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001914274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5975238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081040206","doi":"10.5235/147293411797394397","title":"Towards a Jurisprudence of Constitutional Conventions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"BC Research (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Jurisprudence; Constitution; Law; Political science; Proposition; Enforcement; Politics; Law and economics; Constitutional law; Subject (documents); Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.055376148452998486,"score_gpt":0.2838432333722492,"score_spread":0.22846708491925072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081040206","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019450853,0.00019242776,0.005355382,0.001072101,0.00045935824,0.000092794624,0.00003121956,0.00002786211,0.973318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99732596,0.0010024296,0.0012394706,0.000121975325,0.0000990862,1.7452575e-7,0.0000012171608,0.0000014914397,0.00020817657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989908,0.00015516218,0.00018034858,0.000089897294,0.00034691935,0.00023690035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991663,0.000048213977,0.00018744664,0.00006688963,0.00033343118,0.00019773794],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046775854,0.00007060305,0.00015790413,0.00007492606,0.0027865584,0.00001417855,0.00033269968,0.000059168266,0.00057671656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004255896,0.00007372513,0.00012157649,0.0002325567,0.0037123584,0.0003158331,0.000076750046,0.00020725712,0.0000067867145],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047837268,0.00009003489,0.006604511,0.0000029768878,0.00004005668,0.000031462558,0.0017467773,0.000001375806,0.0000021051665,0.9901132,0.00034307953,0.0009765574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005452774,0.000097525415,0.0112863835,0.00007047982,0.000059904032,0.000035305547,0.010842548,0.000002337496,0.000025960873,0.10001854,0.87686867,0.00014710288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0142165385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013036792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9778751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016941974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085276447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99899894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081855718","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2012.00931_3.x","title":"DawnOliver<i>and</i>CarloFusaro<i>(eds)</i>, How Constitutions Change: A Comparative Study, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2011, 510 pp, hb £55.00.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Political science; Law; Constitutional law; Democracy; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.15153706500358632,"score_gpt":0.35434123078851204,"score_spread":0.20280416578492572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081855718","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004437675,0.71097934,0.00029924742,0.029744716,0.0013113699,0.0033015604,0.00014503552,0.00024168109,0.24953935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8648077,0.12950453,0.00009181607,0.0038834708,0.00088290876,0.00043065735,0.000018966297,0.000009454368,0.00037046053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974083,0.00047935316,0.00034086552,0.00038818113,0.00069169194,0.0006916245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986983,0.00015270282,0.00020469892,0.0002651641,0.00032399857,0.00035516763],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013699214,0.00029523033,0.0007188696,0.000039207935,0.0022398075,0.00037380224,0.0003973828,0.000106774976,0.00028459803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019409046,0.0002490692,0.00015712042,0.00030559662,0.0017519112,0.0025601296,0.00028442574,0.00030434865,0.00020465138],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000079379315,0.0003692854,0.0060641295,0.00013220983,0.00015735746,0.0000052172677,0.0106327385,1.9383195e-7,0.0000029847217,0.9433762,0.03356228,0.0056894943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029951395,0.00003975979,0.0012361044,0.00053934444,0.00023277428,0.0000059696604,0.0010741048,0.0000055696446,0.0000014758957,0.006781287,0.9894583,0.00032576386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01659447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01397008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9558961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012708042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001978438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082442523","doi":"10.1177/0010414010369075","title":"Political Competition as an Obstacle to Judicial Independence: Evidence From Russia and Ukraine","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Political Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"McGill University; Harvard University","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Politics; Ukrainian; Competition (biology); Judicial independence; Democracy; Political economy; Plaintiff; Political science; Economics; Obstacle; Law; Law and economics; Economic system","score_opus":0.14770262699880707,"score_gpt":0.44865569839099356,"score_spread":0.3009530713921865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082442523","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9223128,0.0009425544,0.00011092346,0.019688776,0.0006074002,0.00031163078,0.00005270807,0.00009266343,0.055880558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99584013,0.000054850847,0.00042707846,0.0019771734,0.0015761685,0.000054008986,0.0000046373493,0.000005632841,0.00006032532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748707,0.0002490118,0.00028667817,0.00046443375,0.00068165816,0.0008311486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971997,0.0013728138,0.00004290091,0.00014033013,0.00047165024,0.0007725831],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040455288,0.00021441028,0.00046749067,0.000060308885,0.0016138457,0.00011379046,0.00023576648,0.00011598748,0.00017478522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022777144,0.0001851675,0.000054180713,0.00022095662,0.0037680846,0.00035222006,0.00025753808,0.00037244352,0.00022212657],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004653942,0.00007824076,0.010153402,0.000002564681,0.00006203439,0.00000825768,0.008457979,2.0156152e-7,0.00034821525,0.9804559,0.0002119649,0.00017470607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002649848,0.00026610857,0.17448148,0.00011040423,0.00006716211,0.000003846182,0.0442121,0.000011812864,0.0005535969,0.77055275,0.0090891365,0.00038661307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028263664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024407992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20990315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015880533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025007845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083205220","doi":"10.3138/utlj.020614ra","title":"Proportionality and justification","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Legitimacy; Deliberation; Political science; Law and economics; Supreme court; Accountability; Duty; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.016665978894505853,"score_gpt":0.2422938532457298,"score_spread":0.22562787435122394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083205220","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07068454,0.0006083646,0.0028823542,0.0033408536,0.00019673824,0.000057676996,0.0000030825338,0.000015168943,0.9222112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99891186,0.00033302727,0.00039859692,0.0000254375,0.00010940454,1.0773043e-8,3.4556354e-7,4.2593126e-7,0.00022087019],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965763,0.00005590267,0.000044475506,0.000042396605,0.00014333459,0.000056247198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99972206,0.000020683698,0.000061700004,0.000021114374,0.00012338108,0.000051054645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033292937,0.00002076181,0.000048698876,0.000003484672,0.0011726134,0.0000095545065,0.000058873244,0.000020200225,0.00024906127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034020424,0.00002155434,0.000021312555,0.000009638191,0.00052578666,0.00019817369,0.000015226919,0.000029340164,0.000002179777],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008914164,0.000012961339,0.0022513214,0.0000011570066,0.000009211852,5.192948e-7,0.0016212264,0.0000010057067,0.000019713645,0.99001926,0.00030798916,0.005746746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023934062,0.000033109718,0.09093968,0.00001637218,0.000035165864,0.00000409079,0.013134671,0.000011013486,0.0000076442775,0.04371521,0.8517903,0.00007342099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13133588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2027298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.946304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007759887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041090545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9018913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083521428","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2006.0004","title":"The Rule of Law as Liberal Justice","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Constitutionalism; Law; Constitutional law; Constitutional theory; Legitimacy; Political philosophy; Economic Justice; Rule of law; Philosophy of law; Politics; Political science; Originalism; Democracy; Constitutional economics; Law and economics; Liberal democracy; Public law; Sociology","score_opus":0.010948889504164151,"score_gpt":0.23674918367656606,"score_spread":0.2258002941724019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083521428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02317349,0.0014606554,0.000035556062,0.001468016,0.00023701704,0.00002896582,0.0000039236,0.0000060604757,0.9735863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996824,0.0005429792,0.00015554402,0.000054086657,0.00024153062,1.2308709e-8,2.3712514e-7,9.518463e-7,0.002180631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945843,0.00005527856,0.000076985874,0.000040905183,0.0002508429,0.000117566145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958634,0.00007605186,0.00010067806,0.000035316025,0.00016890615,0.000032702243],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021621512,0.00003421095,0.000077118035,0.0000032649157,0.002672596,0.000016545224,0.00020113279,0.000028005734,0.0002608917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014202036,0.000028792738,0.00007236661,0.000016802556,0.0009841357,0.00022082978,0.000036636287,0.0000534837,0.0000058962523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002945498,0.00002337031,0.00014318642,0.0000010598825,0.000021433329,0.0000058206333,0.0017907493,0.000008591545,0.000024258652,0.99593246,0.001611726,0.00040788102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002506526,0.000038131515,0.0027046273,0.000017682047,0.000078300975,0.00000419196,0.015877208,0.0000012748244,0.000031544805,0.078754,0.90218383,0.00005854894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6344182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.619394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9736505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011794412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008941989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083538255","doi":"10.1089/1533129041492231","title":"Enforcing Campaign Finance Laws: What Others Can Learn from Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Campaign finance; Politics; Election law; Political science; Law; Democracy","score_opus":0.012434137966712649,"score_gpt":0.26911795579487136,"score_spread":0.2566838178281587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083538255","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8513183,0.0036331462,0.00015741488,0.038674176,0.0012720766,0.0001162708,0.000066438435,0.00003738886,0.10472482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98960114,0.0041368315,0.0000558467,0.00368807,0.0021729965,0.0000018905757,0.0000020712625,0.000006233471,0.0003349097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898887,0.000054826687,0.00016706315,0.000105210696,0.00027753806,0.00040648485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995136,0.00006154428,0.00008820176,0.00004196915,0.000111346046,0.00018328453],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001385814,0.00009758239,0.00012817567,0.00004420603,0.0030213187,0.0002772639,0.000084374886,0.000053185995,0.000023429131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009005983,0.00009173261,0.000039828567,0.00014197337,0.00034779354,0.00026025262,0.000015632657,0.00020290117,0.0000039306874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030534159,0.000007370771,0.00021536803,9.293864e-7,0.000024985131,0.000006905672,0.0025355166,0.0001029992,0.000009241794,0.99364924,0.00017838983,0.0032660032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002802385,0.000043597724,0.0016437264,0.00008396292,0.000016985394,0.000028866458,0.007792472,0.0000022116012,0.00015606827,0.5391938,0.45058447,0.00017357507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9962505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9880622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4544554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008304093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022239867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083637015","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12342055","title":"Is It Time For a Coherent Political Question Doctrine in South Africa? Lessons from the United States","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Politics; Theme (computing); Political science; Political question; Law; Relation (database); Computer science","score_opus":0.07666122559971053,"score_gpt":0.3625516391955993,"score_spread":0.28589041359588874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083637015","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46682498,0.0066554844,0.0013151156,0.50026286,0.00077212305,0.000587313,0.0002130354,0.000039061153,0.023330016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977401,0.00025971266,0.00012809692,0.0009238465,0.000699997,0.000013788359,0.0000022823765,0.000004470493,0.0002277142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984168,0.0003008604,0.000382697,0.00012183761,0.00041220547,0.0003656007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99756104,0.001554134,0.00021825134,0.000061544735,0.0005060106,0.000099041456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00114771,0.00011905339,0.00034346673,0.00008265957,0.0006365781,0.000056322002,0.00023025012,0.000034463905,0.000024619185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015978679,0.00007412171,0.00012182554,0.00035554002,0.0008297292,0.000109798566,0.000061006587,0.00017181151,0.000011214779],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023440307,0.00015431925,0.010213054,0.000006055537,0.0005580736,0.000010414083,0.12616912,0.00006273436,0.000018883842,0.8394461,0.02203466,0.0010921328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093836716,0.0003764972,0.008161546,0.00020710325,0.00019219604,0.0000019610961,0.17695029,0.00007959142,0.000022890114,0.1414838,0.6713638,0.00022199303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059490576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023050853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69796234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018707843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014159271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8993235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084843819","doi":"10.1086/382610","title":"Law versus the State: The Judicialization of Politics in Egypt","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Social Inquiry","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Opposition (politics); Politics; Human rights; Political science; Property rights; Constitutional court; State (computer science); Law; Law and economics; Political economy; Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.08634775081095694,"score_gpt":0.3580794609783892,"score_spread":0.27173171016743225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084843819","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16651924,0.0011433347,0.000088098335,0.007222434,0.0029426126,0.0004411671,0.00001843917,0.00004763644,0.821577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99795234,0.00013820318,0.0000066291227,0.0011645491,0.0006378242,0.00001417366,0.0000017984133,0.000004547724,0.00007993192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987052,0.0003611715,0.00020266382,0.000101065314,0.00036367498,0.00026622193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994218,0.00028073048,0.00008459972,0.0000728104,0.000115203155,0.000024863328],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006241518,0.00007370679,0.00013013049,0.000008388199,0.0018113811,0.000034555185,0.00018890094,0.000066768036,0.00003612584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000193093,0.000050224564,0.000062755804,0.00035961598,0.0041864766,0.00009248951,0.000034255725,0.0001117233,0.0000115107105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011395153,0.000027700555,0.00028306255,0.0000013800179,0.000017281316,6.876185e-7,0.030038016,0.000010174579,0.0000054649113,0.9690187,0.00043946222,0.00014665151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037606593,0.000023619297,0.0018408726,0.000010228024,0.000028834429,1.1994446e-7,0.03654952,0.0000012161674,0.00009378136,0.6604952,0.3004641,0.000116392664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048676737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08022262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8314331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000101858306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020094997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085449761","doi":"10.7202/042970ar","title":"Judicial Immunity from Charter Review: Myth or Reality?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Supreme court; Judicial review; Political science; Judicial independence; Qualified immunity; Statutory law; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.025408794691181288,"score_gpt":0.29539213562967065,"score_spread":0.26998334093848936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085449761","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28673598,0.031067133,0.0020433287,0.10137673,0.0009058792,0.0008882278,0.0002312822,0.0004297392,0.5763217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9440584,0.025323482,0.00054718595,0.022742437,0.0027334818,0.00004493822,0.000036418576,0.000011722381,0.004501905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988215,0.00016632059,0.00020190634,0.00017285469,0.0003134492,0.00032395337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944824,0.000151352,0.00007260852,0.00014194743,0.000069809685,0.0001160322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005349873,0.0001028543,0.0002280135,0.0000256168,0.0010700279,0.0000305942,0.00024698878,0.00013459937,0.0007340027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042127588,0.00009227269,0.00009915371,0.00020410745,0.0009890994,0.00013992171,0.00003394742,0.00027672114,0.0002139993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018264208,0.00019352065,0.0017767849,0.000045409026,0.0002039859,0.000047624224,0.025365284,0.0000029519854,0.00014375092,0.58211964,0.13237612,0.25754228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016326127,0.000022255523,0.0052075274,0.00016940302,0.00006168276,0.0000013267183,0.0015981932,0.0000023196703,0.000025953947,0.044000097,0.948569,0.0001789995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028113643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019021347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81619287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052979914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020661174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99887896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085460521","doi":"10.1080/13698230902738486","title":"Crime and criminal law reform: a theory of the legislative response","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legislator; Criminal law; Law; Political science; Public law; Law reform; Philosophy of law; Legislature; Pluralism (philosophy); Politics; Sociology; Law and economics; Legislation; Epistemology","score_opus":0.07409662880293616,"score_gpt":0.38945622318428685,"score_spread":0.3153595943813507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085460521","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026007777,0.0090013435,0.000025013338,0.15923293,0.00014576864,0.00013157954,0.000059958034,0.00000840948,0.82879424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877701,0.0014691676,0.00003954907,0.010231996,0.0004366399,0.0000040322934,9.675016e-7,0.0000020785592,0.000045474502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998639,0.00033504254,0.00028811386,0.00012554541,0.000420946,0.00019136748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988165,0.00063292996,0.000052768984,0.00004884939,0.00034636867,0.00010257699],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070536166,0.00008602716,0.00024137861,0.000019727928,0.00045118545,0.000012909146,0.0001663702,0.000056280685,0.000058256453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028052814,0.000058116922,0.00012187915,0.00008401566,0.004293007,0.00010648525,0.00007367733,0.00012316901,0.0000017616486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009837519,0.000055093667,0.000028839504,0.00012114761,0.000017512193,9.787224e-7,0.00068263704,1.0342057e-9,0.000022496177,0.99809146,0.00004012424,0.0008413259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000091333546,0.000063901505,0.012339349,0.00089539576,0.00006557453,0.0000021685237,0.0003763837,2.2416762e-7,0.000029741204,0.9708443,0.015222684,0.00006891364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00057845766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000797052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9851693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000062626386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009829407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087400586","doi":"10.7202/1025757ar","title":"Le Parlement, les tribunaux et la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013728628744458541,"score_gpt":0.25797610979695684,"score_spread":0.2442474810524983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087400586","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57217085,0.0034611209,0.005232637,0.02382935,0.0006309988,0.00020783026,0.00011519701,0.00009080974,0.3942612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9739352,0.0022040296,0.00031876893,0.0025060154,0.00040657783,0.00003912261,0.000022933333,0.000020821375,0.02054656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974664,0.0006965839,0.0002848541,0.00036233914,0.00028290958,0.0009069387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987163,0.0005222598,0.00012973418,0.00014774119,0.00012699304,0.00035695577],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017344039,0.00024424554,0.0003427522,0.000069327514,0.0017630372,0.00013239405,0.0003193778,0.000338625,0.0001644168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005216258,0.00028059306,0.00017233705,0.00039084983,0.0040600565,0.00030168289,0.00007029338,0.0004923621,0.00008917663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013287453,0.00007969249,0.0025863417,0.000021550908,0.000108837616,0.000018015318,0.013456552,0.000030574636,0.00003317212,0.90176845,0.0012140142,0.0806695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032753794,0.00006201739,0.012185228,0.000088404464,0.000062621184,0.000008835978,0.003115558,0.000024278752,0.000030466064,0.36740887,0.6164255,0.00026068327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23555255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44963643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6152115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067602645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005250797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087436012","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-121x.2004.tb00240.x","title":"Supreme Courts, independence and democratic agency","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Independence (probability theory); Judicial independence; Argument (complex analysis); Principal (computer security); Democracy; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Medicine; Politics","score_opus":0.043377433642921605,"score_gpt":0.3255763760675642,"score_spread":0.28219894242464255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087436012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7877491,0.041419435,0.00017420074,0.025257021,0.0008562196,0.0003408352,0.0000068410877,0.00016669421,0.14402966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99373764,0.0048499745,0.0001391376,0.00044890487,0.00025140375,0.000017340173,2.6830327e-7,0.000002807374,0.0005525296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906296,0.00003560847,0.00012687157,0.00017386893,0.0003549818,0.00024568976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996568,0.00006882501,0.00003572494,0.00004998975,0.00012687682,0.00006176724],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024746027,0.00009389762,0.00016568227,0.000023555376,0.0015418325,0.00004115169,0.000095757,0.000041772248,0.000013707113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003385887,0.00007889307,0.000031521096,0.00012649424,0.0010742205,0.00021731229,0.000097490156,0.000097093434,0.000032665448],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064008577,0.00003096953,0.0063180635,0.000009235849,0.00010397947,0.00003151467,0.018470632,0.0000066732737,0.00004178,0.97122276,0.00074166193,0.003016324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004333643,0.00007465517,0.040812023,0.00009699192,0.00006333946,0.0000063032885,0.013832663,7.5524866e-7,0.000086250126,0.8768113,0.067469954,0.00031238532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009753676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012804503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20598854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009716225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014442512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087764830","doi":"10.1080/13510347.2013.779255","title":"Citizenship, social rights and judicial review in regime transition: the case of Russia","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Democratization","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Social rights; Appeal; Political science; Politics; Authoritarianism; State (computer science); Petitioner; Citizenship; Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.019107308400049226,"score_gpt":0.28109405938003695,"score_spread":0.26198675097998775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087764830","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5807354,0.017293783,0.0021123714,0.1846009,0.00048590012,0.0028710705,0.000027371956,0.00009905073,0.21177414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99813277,0.00087806233,0.000027230852,0.0006761635,0.00020833047,0.000029639787,0.000004508168,0.0000017421487,0.000041582556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993233,0.00018100544,0.00018135419,0.000088530825,0.0001267649,0.00009904849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970764,0.00006732497,0.000066897104,0.00003378115,0.000102842605,0.000021495436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028724992,0.000051818555,0.00012309087,0.000024246077,0.00077037525,0.000019282232,0.000045353452,0.00004328013,0.00013039036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007024951,0.000037288526,0.000024918445,0.0003003786,0.0004286542,0.0001064608,0.00000900981,0.00005300892,0.0000087300195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005918837,0.000024195548,0.00041706,0.000054032098,0.000019649557,0.000028169768,0.011471167,0.0000024171072,0.000029300394,0.963283,0.01640825,0.008256856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027429807,0.00001984484,0.0113049885,0.00029842695,0.00005762701,0.0000255411,0.0021020696,0.000074999756,0.000014403589,0.9828913,0.0027897453,0.00014676215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007131239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005273594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41739732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021892434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051341995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99948037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088599363","doi":"10.5860/choice.47-1667","title":"The transformation of the Supreme Court of Canada: an empirical examination","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Choice Reviews Online","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Empirical examination; Law; Transformation (genetics); Political science; History; Economics; Actuarial science","score_opus":0.07131800365419595,"score_gpt":0.3633848978290991,"score_spread":0.29206689417490317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088599363","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7628716,0.052714452,0.00036399934,0.12213993,0.00086760963,0.0021245682,0.00011534811,0.00003059753,0.05877188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916175,0.0077596754,0.000027054813,0.0003525291,0.00015571782,0.000003288666,0.0000053280387,8.911262e-7,0.000078015546],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990742,0.0002112737,0.0002726887,0.000051092036,0.00029622286,0.0000944773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950427,0.00010828183,0.00013329025,0.00008666954,0.00014145982,0.000026012207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079363637,0.00004392018,0.00013350029,0.0000068736726,0.00043038672,0.0000049971163,0.00018754738,0.000021830172,0.0000071186837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052566093,0.000022581751,0.000048382924,0.00020992731,0.00019816296,0.00008481204,0.000005796635,0.000052281404,3.3755845e-7],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011260095,0.0003249524,0.0072346856,0.000063637104,0.000025325902,1.8253294e-7,0.0080507435,0.000020775562,0.00034242187,0.111323394,0.0053024655,0.86730015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058282,0.000021791366,0.2772135,0.00007701489,0.00001957747,1.4188359e-7,0.00072628754,0.000026617061,0.0000443302,0.0012325967,0.7205418,0.00003809313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.082237035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82300806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86726207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000073950214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042986812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92387444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089555659","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00296.x","title":"Why Does the Federal Government Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada in Charter of Rights Cases? A Strategic Explanation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Charter; Law; Political science; Government (linguistics); Scholarship","score_opus":0.029560177383275408,"score_gpt":0.283070811602102,"score_spread":0.2535106342188266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089555659","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21229598,0.22144526,0.000056557503,0.3006017,0.0013074002,0.0045317756,0.00026582027,0.00003208245,0.25946343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.978803,0.013578262,0.000012532687,0.0074306238,0.00010289316,0.000017248894,0.0000013579489,0.0000013900151,0.000052712458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988592,0.00007496926,0.0002356039,0.00008466514,0.0005799961,0.00016556398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996025,0.00012954806,0.00009566006,0.000075436496,0.00006509025,0.000031790893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009817247,0.00006113311,0.0001647768,3.9600468e-7,0.0004530017,0.000009484648,0.00015193313,0.000020377991,0.00004895478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000197695,0.000028779337,0.00008602534,0.00015884615,0.00022363485,0.000037261718,0.000024500443,0.00006042052,7.934497e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009990135,0.000058434067,0.0012788286,0.00019850631,0.00007863191,0.000004639353,0.004084879,0.000004105894,0.000019112544,0.92155147,0.07186256,0.0008488544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000105333216,0.000023566428,0.0026437833,0.00070163887,0.000036699497,0.0000012192704,0.008496392,0.000002078249,0.00004445338,0.0069681313,0.980872,0.00010472705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6749712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9857366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9145833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001803015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001708774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34841686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091584033","doi":"10.7202/042658ar","title":"Constitutional Procedure for the Reform of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Humanities; Political science; Tribunal; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011940462094190188,"score_gpt":0.23176765108717548,"score_spread":0.21982718899298528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091584033","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32483217,0.036431964,0.004020256,0.33298135,0.0039073736,0.0018850047,0.0016395384,0.000026013353,0.29427636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908401,0.00027767877,0.00015915153,0.00096392,0.00046885453,0.000024251933,0.0000019254887,0.000002569179,0.0072615757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989209,0.00003422539,0.00023240152,0.000108668915,0.00041722032,0.00028654735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992063,0.0002735064,0.00015699977,0.0001002232,0.00021220505,0.000050775998],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037508263,0.00009228455,0.00016346884,0.00000778205,0.0010978881,0.00000694092,0.00033315914,0.00011995133,0.000068617905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022903933,0.000060167953,0.00013146883,0.00021539179,0.008823922,0.000060144273,0.000031829713,0.00017558591,0.0000010127566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020358755,0.00002868073,0.00097487547,0.000031376123,0.000108552806,3.35809e-7,0.0015904568,0.00036746016,0.000020442532,0.98630315,0.006754581,0.0037997253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002994326,0.000027462518,0.008957579,0.00013126156,0.00016594864,0.000009057873,0.011506108,0.00018518294,0.0005796791,0.056785412,0.9212085,0.00014436917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44290024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84090525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92951775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016337204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030359142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9938735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092340031","doi":"10.1080/02722011.2011.623234","title":"Free Votes, MPs, and Constituents: The Case of Same-Sex Marriage in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Review of Canadian Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05397172324116924,"score_gpt":0.2961896192655303,"score_spread":0.24221789602436106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092340031","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18691622,0.7023325,5.9727626e-7,0.021185203,0.00022163033,0.00077137724,0.00028374136,0.000006208409,0.088282526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7837012,0.21365897,0.000021868052,0.0025508993,0.000024469622,0.000017930473,2.3338322e-7,0.0000020898522,0.000022353992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901384,0.0002234091,0.00027237594,0.00010405581,0.00015850307,0.0002277988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905014,0.00032872646,0.00021115218,0.00019248607,0.00013152145,0.000085992986],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006381348,0.00009204733,0.00044108165,0.000059399783,0.00040866152,0.0000026188134,0.00027979436,0.000007148462,0.000024361656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00086571235,0.000053234646,0.000037517188,0.0006703034,0.00419079,0.00002916414,0.00008146833,0.00007415788,6.3173445e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023201266,0.000032137777,0.101688474,0.00088586967,0.0009507511,0.0007739063,0.03534338,6.302763e-7,0.0000022376782,0.58235127,0.067873225,0.21007492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040618,0.0001230519,0.11058262,0.0046882005,0.0005326687,0.00011880804,0.40885785,8.73317e-7,0.000017822424,0.028622055,0.44545344,0.00059643685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9998909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99997133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59678495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020022916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020197276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99851924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092436718","doi":"10.1111/0149-0508.00185","title":"Constitution‐making and the Transformation of Conflict","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Peace &amp Change","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Polity; Conflict transformation; Negotiation; Constitutionalism; Settlement (finance); Power (physics); Law; Conversation; Political science; Sociology; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.1308851059749888,"score_gpt":0.3452477600621338,"score_spread":0.214362654087145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092436718","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14618589,0.013527331,0.0023894156,0.03034121,0.00042803612,0.0007592608,0.000017191627,0.00007283343,0.8062788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994704,0.0046108775,0.000021246367,0.00034280517,0.00019663236,0.000024314413,0.0000015654988,9.2683314e-7,0.00009763318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950224,0.00006299747,0.000097898694,0.000058316527,0.00016876623,0.00010977852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997437,0.0000903649,0.00004669212,0.00003820351,0.000060892355,0.00002015567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004408105,0.00004353067,0.00009389437,0.000022794002,0.0005878846,0.000016871914,0.000060284685,0.000027244128,0.000049940863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008572585,0.000030335423,0.00002983569,0.00013304979,0.001447399,0.00013784283,0.000013411051,0.00004121006,0.000010973535],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029566536,0.0000083100695,0.0017589298,0.0000039411525,0.00001138261,3.3691623e-7,0.05472199,6.0575917e-7,0.0000092927185,0.937393,0.00012470606,0.005937937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005132911,0.000007281421,0.0051205046,0.00004206402,0.000025033714,0.000003689804,0.008107539,0.000011872208,0.0000068134477,0.0058051245,0.9802858,0.00007093487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007118413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065284884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98016113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018425895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032533408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99949324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092671075","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2010.0007","title":"Language and Judgment's Reach: Reflecting on Limits on Rights","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Proportionality (law); Constitution; Supreme court; Political science; Constitutional law; Legislature; Common law; Fidelity; Bill of rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.03164118550424202,"score_gpt":0.29693485752345006,"score_spread":0.26529367201920806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092671075","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40631455,0.000088856475,0.000003512818,0.0005354412,0.00019980111,0.00002326913,0.0000016514261,0.000008347104,0.5928246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988528,0.00010867273,0.00017553201,0.000067389534,0.00023460617,1.291019e-8,2.056555e-7,0.00000101246,0.0005597973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953455,0.00004184845,0.00004542784,0.000071271366,0.00019839569,0.00010849674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971056,0.00005896019,0.00006134178,0.00003656694,0.000052790245,0.000079762285],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021213859,0.00004284475,0.00007435476,0.000010944722,0.0018712741,0.000018604413,0.00009830038,0.000041661253,0.00027755435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002921357,0.00003994558,0.000034656096,0.000015147538,0.00031236565,0.00016103276,0.000017664857,0.00015151438,0.0000057655475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008214499,0.00005693124,0.00042174445,0.000001005376,0.000034354507,0.000039642804,0.016803931,9.016069e-7,0.0007898105,0.9749669,0.00072193664,0.0060807345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013513484,0.0005417443,0.019769643,0.00015685972,0.000086123044,0.000022726614,0.07837212,0.0000036126855,0.00074644625,0.017799163,0.88080084,0.00034934244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17253983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6348849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9571677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009086585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002838462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99942815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093414811","doi":"10.7202/042761ar","title":"The Sovereignty of the Judiciary","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Mistake; Public interest; Sovereignty; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Judicial review; Parliamentary sovereignty; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.010582786827421762,"score_gpt":0.23657822620541205,"score_spread":0.2259954393779903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093414811","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23464955,0.041613378,0.00022927794,0.06542094,0.0017491732,0.00024397208,0.00004223735,0.000025641564,0.6560258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98139346,0.0027170219,0.00006265877,0.0013513537,0.0009924666,0.0000074755426,3.9466235e-7,0.0000051396505,0.013470029],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873656,0.00017840277,0.00020497212,0.00012677987,0.0003780411,0.00037526328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991972,0.00038930622,0.00012653705,0.0001555661,0.00007017465,0.000061205894],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005587258,0.0001004652,0.0001392944,0.000010837524,0.0021945257,0.000026578287,0.0004442332,0.00017229035,0.00014965876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025053264,0.0000665783,0.00019239061,0.000328411,0.0069303643,0.000083461884,0.00007268396,0.00033974,0.00006555147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008062319,0.000028278151,0.0013233003,0.000002631523,0.00006133405,0.0000010039744,0.0031361878,0.000053876316,0.000009862012,0.9261758,0.0037853678,0.06541432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078607256,0.000010421382,0.010978784,0.000037143418,0.000051564406,0.0000023103596,0.0029530334,0.00002114896,0.000077590914,0.5733687,0.41234386,0.00007679793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008446197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008610644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7467439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006593269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002910146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095156199","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.2914.e08","title":"Canadian Exclusion of Evidence Under Section 24(2) of the <i>Charter</i>: An Empirical Model of Judicial Discourse","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Charter; Judicial review; Majority opinion; Operationalization; Judicial opinion; Political science; Judicial activism; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.24148708468873337,"score_gpt":0.37324244996885786,"score_spread":0.1317553652801245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095156199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98427653,0.0008071845,0.0026342887,0.00828934,0.0009288963,0.00015224007,0.000049202314,0.000006762365,0.0028555468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970353,0.0005626929,0.00064905663,0.0012232043,0.0004464748,0.000004894725,0.0000020096834,0.000014638692,0.00006171112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969477,0.00085237715,0.0007335601,0.0002827194,0.00021812395,0.0009655426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960847,0.00095087255,0.00065041234,0.00027711966,0.00089512515,0.00114177],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021393246,0.00023961102,0.0005960208,0.00048093498,0.0008514763,0.000028312834,0.00076260074,0.0004365305,0.000039447576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048373495,0.0001999509,0.0001779212,0.0001961733,0.0030836216,0.00032785934,0.00006120247,0.00068629294,6.547528e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005038769,0.00019084109,0.01918216,0.0015680933,0.00025552907,0.00023719964,0.15721714,0.014169292,0.005375233,0.78463864,0.001463256,0.015198758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016668679,0.0025969888,0.22200312,0.0025027923,0.02001355,0.0016810299,0.61560977,0.0045835283,0.0016392356,0.12299643,0.0034433913,0.0012632931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5684156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9362819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6616422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079901115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011579913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096012278","doi":"","title":"Fiscal Federalism and Public Service Provision in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Devolution (biology); Section (typography); Fiscal federalism; Revenue; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Budget process; Public service; Service (business); Public finance; Federalism; Political science; Business; Economic policy; Public economics; Economics; Decentralization; Finance; Economy; Geography; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.05407290004316007,"score_gpt":0.3336257876243948,"score_spread":0.27955288758123475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096012278","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7081532,0.0003555331,3.1581467e-7,0.011232908,0.0003422586,0.00048223863,0.000023383363,0.000011609321,0.27939856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99095565,0.00797254,0.000042400956,0.00042630767,0.00024087106,0.00006052578,0.000013312572,0.000009417877,0.00027899566],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977157,0.00024857154,0.00035730566,0.00050741824,0.00041819207,0.0007528302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896795,0.00043742155,0.00007344544,0.00018237649,0.00013085015,0.00020795298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018942493,0.00014837016,0.00030159345,0.00023097015,0.000554597,0.00017043966,0.00038344177,0.00023317577,0.000040464467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005226661,0.00015961124,0.000032529348,0.0002096159,0.0004502192,0.00010216599,0.0008772438,0.0009862778,0.0000023393934],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009677654,0.00014628217,0.45038566,0.00014117146,0.000074692805,0.0001689138,0.005384785,0.0006381367,0.0000060859593,0.04941911,0.00044390824,0.49309447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001060438,0.000044379405,0.39846906,0.00055425783,0.000007668382,0.0000053547014,0.05442633,0.0015786712,0.000007188317,0.049162958,0.49355358,0.0011300981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98299706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49310967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035041976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007524463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99810195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096241879","doi":"","title":"Governance and law in transition states","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"DSpace repository (University of Tartu)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Oxford; University of Cambridge; Tartu Ülikool; Ohio State University","keywords":"Transition (genetics); Political science; Corporate governance; Law; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Chemistry","score_opus":0.0066380323277276014,"score_gpt":0.21310008562544536,"score_spread":0.20646205329771775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096241879","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77234066,0.0026073672,0.000019657877,0.0012773643,0.0003690487,0.0001926093,0.000023862933,0.000027864071,0.22314155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925066,0.002072521,0.000060848786,0.000017162965,0.000046038575,2.986799e-7,0.000030155943,0.0000032577548,0.0052631064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934894,0.000048094662,0.000072246476,0.0001713238,0.00023904149,0.00012035415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996828,0.00002779915,0.00012141075,0.000047605514,0.000080526595,0.00003985796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000082583756,0.000083390325,0.00018199535,0.000028532977,0.00058743224,0.000017538156,0.00009101198,0.00013306116,0.000011046568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000069635025,0.0001112669,0.00005381597,0.00011405816,0.0004260058,0.00026299414,0.000009738636,0.00011163077,0.0000023863734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036360815,0.00017209648,0.0016819254,0.00021621665,0.00013070932,0.00024080217,0.16808131,0.00015456331,0.0009207274,0.8264256,0.0005327674,0.0010796796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022722825,0.00024074774,0.16609895,0.0026796905,0.00039286268,0.0000068793743,0.6899693,0.0000227594,0.0009904542,0.047320407,0.08870872,0.0012969382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2021824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3183373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7791052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017663988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025454277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8031303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096428617","doi":"10.1093/icon/moi051","title":"Parliament and the Human Rights Act: Can the JCHR help facilitate a culture of rights?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Parliamentary sovereignty; International human rights law; Reservation of rights; Fundamental rights; Political science; Law; Parliament; Linguistic rights; Bill of rights; Right to property; Convention; Legislation; Rights of Nature; State (computer science); Politics; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.017848215959071483,"score_gpt":0.28475449525102664,"score_spread":0.26690627929195515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096428617","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14941508,0.003986288,0.0010344682,0.045573574,0.0025843873,0.00049782166,0.0002683645,0.000024082681,0.79661596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982377,0.000058468275,0.000071116425,0.00034625092,0.0009075675,0.0000058888386,0.0000054352745,0.0000012587402,0.00036625622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980456,0.00015796935,0.00047732424,0.00009924237,0.0010756933,0.00014416577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983172,0.00028316662,0.00036322154,0.00005982069,0.0009254043,0.000051196905],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007637717,0.00010925621,0.00020340632,0.00004834611,0.0014817752,0.0000932396,0.00045260583,0.00004916573,0.00008885261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059965387,0.000054410004,0.00017080865,0.00008462136,0.010143775,0.00019602486,0.000060454287,0.00018770408,0.0000045621437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007619316,0.000056006884,0.00081407407,9.598671e-7,0.00018823537,0.00001661475,0.001082614,0.00007218649,0.000055046057,0.99572206,0.0018584761,0.000057515233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083835836,0.000018495322,0.0012158073,0.00005257533,0.000042663578,0.00005100541,0.0003584798,0.0000018687005,0.00010819637,0.5500374,0.44721115,0.000064027205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034549348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018189896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8488227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012142126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002561696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099367595","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-4743-2_2","title":"The Concept of the Rule of Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ius gentium","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Rule of law; Rhetorical question; Ideal (ethics); Meaning (existential); Salient; Politics; Political science; State (computer science); Law; Rhetorical device; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03579617661374124,"score_gpt":0.27617159059042073,"score_spread":0.2403754139766795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099367595","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000079197336,0.012518481,0.00000181547,0.0009917191,0.001250319,0.00014435759,0.000051709132,0.000006575606,0.98495585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6799163,0.0010879367,0.0000067837846,0.0001793836,0.0007179428,0.000004850403,0.0000019711083,0.000007580333,0.3180772],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920285,0.0000248211,0.00017156762,0.000073490315,0.0003865893,0.0001406998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940926,0.00009255545,0.00019801705,0.0001394057,0.00013559383,0.000025151947],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020037455,0.00007764051,0.00014971492,0.000006916295,0.0006920538,0.000008687021,0.0003154407,0.00009226557,0.00025574036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023736246,0.00004338477,0.0001680027,0.000018817333,0.0031898338,0.00002385876,0.00011533047,0.00009425215,0.00003565755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021517653,0.0000049530017,0.000037361882,0.0000019551098,0.000052648105,1.14113405e-7,0.00138813,2.159922e-7,0.000008039756,0.9957699,0.001553178,0.0011813303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028437777,0.0000037412656,0.00017429658,0.000025984848,0.000044254717,1.1998318e-7,0.00018004708,2.0069587e-8,0.00009451253,0.12808517,0.8713158,0.000047664274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036013583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026081197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8697626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025031388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013429119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W210173211","doi":"","title":"The Unwritten Constitution and the Rule of Law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Opposition (politics); Constitution; Political science; Legitimacy; Duty; Rule of law; Legal positivism; Judicial review; Argument (complex analysis); Democracy; Public law; Philosophy of law; Politics","score_opus":0.015495677701411931,"score_gpt":0.24715142364706025,"score_spread":0.2316557459456483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W210173211","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061160456,0.002583363,0.00015879306,0.022925964,0.00008426197,0.00012653366,0.0000039371944,0.0000125862,0.9129441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99805784,0.0014939852,0.00007412806,0.000038835155,0.00002272937,1.006759e-7,2.074697e-7,4.429653e-7,0.00031171844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996497,0.00004241535,0.00003381034,0.0000525423,0.00014250913,0.00007902993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997145,0.000089525194,0.000053079526,0.000052949188,0.000068257534,0.00002172429],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024706294,0.000031506002,0.00008186587,0.0000029010887,0.0013919346,0.0000065570207,0.00012720247,0.000024450252,0.00012966698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030369994,0.00002164781,0.000038921153,0.000026097601,0.0053801127,0.00013112191,0.00005333391,0.000026920156,0.000002551451],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042449232,0.000007516999,0.000116429546,0.000001167187,0.000022718472,4.9332937e-7,0.01848828,0.0000038265,0.00001548813,0.9791491,0.000028216997,0.0021242993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044383523,0.00009570276,0.16240013,0.000092362454,0.00022072947,0.0000023843363,0.4652778,0.00000998744,0.000076071614,0.13550407,0.23162954,0.00025288004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7843755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5223369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9368974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006983277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000097232936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101827679","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x13000471","title":"Niqabs in Canadian Courts:<i>R v NS</i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Plaintiff; Supreme court; Subject (documents); Law; Test (biology); Trial court; Political science; Face (sociological concept); Psychology; Questions and answers; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.015699070106776854,"score_gpt":0.2675490999569741,"score_spread":0.2518500298501973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101827679","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06104563,0.00036162173,0.00013478256,0.023898536,0.00068024243,0.00016105766,0.0000051450234,0.000024943405,0.91368806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971834,0.00006897534,0.00016841237,0.0017121522,0.0007580018,0.000006606727,4.5659743e-7,0.0000044067833,0.00009757875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857086,0.00010408145,0.00021513549,0.00010797301,0.00035202992,0.0006499064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989425,0.00012787028,0.00003177573,0.00004401813,0.00013333897,0.0007204865],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044395382,0.00008102173,0.00013750339,0.00007216162,0.0014850997,0.00018573647,0.00018531585,0.000076674856,0.002171376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031332983,0.0000711436,0.000053057156,0.0001628192,0.00068856636,0.00026067698,0.000020748881,0.00031111576,0.0006765759],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025629977,0.000022978908,0.006770579,4.832698e-7,0.0000080078735,0.00006769047,0.00046646403,0.000008523475,0.000005344544,0.9859367,0.004725818,0.0019848342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032251579,0.000037743845,0.07633701,0.000053871932,0.00001321381,0.000046060693,0.0026450236,0.00004220892,0.0000062297436,0.37371615,0.54652536,0.00025462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9048387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9531163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9361378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003292397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062394125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102281821","doi":"10.1017/s0008423907071156","title":"Judicial Decision Making In the Supreme Court of Canada: Updating the Personal Attribute Model","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Voting; Political science; Law; Politics; Civil liberties; Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04421095861280156,"score_gpt":0.31964519533576125,"score_spread":0.2754342367229597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102281821","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94793856,0.00018035552,0.0019227089,0.02206148,0.00047765533,0.00009359787,0.000021078085,0.0000012760136,0.027303284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980352,0.0000021894225,0.00015036494,0.0014900009,0.00031537222,3.2437273e-7,6.172729e-8,0.000001378242,0.0000051136863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99746627,0.000062011124,0.0003381047,0.000089399044,0.0011323708,0.0009118597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983175,0.000644619,0.00010865406,0.000057141537,0.00040391443,0.00046817848],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062633194,0.000059708003,0.00012466458,0.00011182248,0.0015918758,0.000059808644,0.0007437353,0.000030111732,0.000027200353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034336043,0.00003598312,0.000047594192,0.0007052823,0.0028138554,0.000160899,0.000024245332,0.00023308775,5.399628e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004776019,0.000004494304,0.016988894,5.3358144e-7,0.0000024287715,0.000037799276,0.0031173513,0.000091957874,0.00001106058,0.9783939,0.000610218,0.00073655316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016758712,0.00004101862,0.836691,0.00015197266,0.000019575584,0.000052170435,0.051845536,0.000852147,0.000029694564,0.10768651,0.0023152397,0.0001475409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.913509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9958653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8707074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010651294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020608319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102413032","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2010.00112.x","title":"Standards of judicial review of administrative bodies: The consideration of citizen participation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Appeal; Political science; Bureaucracy; Standard of review; Judicial review; Consistency (knowledge bases); Public participation; Legislation; Judicial opinion; Quality (philosophy); Law; Judicial deference; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.07056674159199602,"score_gpt":0.3802773077074847,"score_spread":0.30971056611548864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102413032","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3532585,0.004802172,0.0006750073,0.20917329,0.0017000113,0.0026224307,0.00208264,0.00004938477,0.42563656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990182,0.00041083142,0.00004773124,0.00029964498,0.00012317892,0.000028728395,0.00003637581,0.0000027729056,0.00003257325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986153,0.00013989322,0.00046243222,0.00010802355,0.00050175586,0.00017255158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978176,0.00017645674,0.00035454152,0.00012286253,0.0013859692,0.00014258636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012323452,0.000073632385,0.00020273023,0.00006602666,0.00043128888,0.000022279279,0.00013210937,0.000076846765,0.00044537807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037010112,0.00006231169,0.00006258729,0.00025131996,0.0013169706,0.00017851352,0.000008243235,0.00010019904,0.000001254514],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000084001795,0.000024861056,0.001973182,0.000098137796,0.000024540564,7.1284234e-7,0.0010123181,8.0835285e-8,0.00016345011,0.9925365,0.002165523,0.001992297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010378805,0.0012728855,0.04957295,0.0022573827,0.00046683705,0.00000784026,0.01821827,0.00004325114,0.012103179,0.112782374,0.801426,0.0008111766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016526809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8477771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8797541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007854493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010791215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99481666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105286613","doi":"10.7202/1000629ar","title":"Witnessing Arbitrariness: Roncarelli v. Duplessis Fifty Years On","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Principle of legality; Normative; Politics; Law; Sociology; Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; History; Linguistics","score_opus":0.08032181496622609,"score_gpt":0.2892118379418761,"score_spread":0.20889002297565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105286613","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039600052,0.00019592018,0.000040690637,0.0004614161,0.0008272536,0.000048604838,0.0000070298265,0.00004181873,0.9587772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985338,0.00018134729,0.0002548164,0.0004090731,0.00050203735,0.0000026863934,3.9012505e-7,0.0000061950354,0.00010964382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896103,0.00008472183,0.00016928808,0.00012262276,0.00038107566,0.00028125817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995716,0.00003976215,0.000092231545,0.00006241616,0.00010035127,0.00013363292],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003557565,0.00008749891,0.00013429801,0.000037340014,0.0053546806,0.000050958562,0.00018703002,0.000059696154,0.00045759353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055526103,0.00007511545,0.00009157116,0.00014121116,0.00052527216,0.00020848043,0.000033864646,0.0002327653,0.000107878055],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022093565,0.000059161077,0.001531193,9.448908e-7,0.00003103999,0.00007272751,0.0011909866,0.0000042271595,0.000004038198,0.985078,0.0001497349,0.011855897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034952257,0.00007726187,0.031306528,0.000118394724,0.000042237123,0.00002843542,0.003584016,0.0000021612382,0.0001449797,0.07957382,0.8844906,0.00028204586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015635373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019524317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9589338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009789843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032000564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99836683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105317282","doi":"10.1017/s0008423905040655","title":"Strategic Leadership and Political Change on the Canadian Supreme Court: Analyzing the Transition to Chief Justice","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Dissent; Political science; Politics; Economic Justice; Position (finance); Relevance (law); Sociology; Law; Humanities; Law and economics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.15608409676281135,"score_gpt":0.32394545354427234,"score_spread":0.167861356781461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105317282","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2612244,0.00021081488,0.000022490489,0.6895219,0.00029700267,0.00016798027,0.000025732914,0.0000042017523,0.048525505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9755196,0.000005114352,0.00002396587,0.02292369,0.0015017687,0.000002996118,1.549727e-7,0.000002831353,0.00001986082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759674,0.00013054903,0.00018560166,0.0001408576,0.0005082843,0.001437986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960894,0.00027712376,0.0000333029,0.000081542785,0.00028627092,0.003232349],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001898273,0.000092715505,0.000115442504,0.00021913016,0.0039112857,0.00033364538,0.00048239276,0.00005121779,0.00011505144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000983574,0.00005702747,0.000047569814,0.00060302165,0.0039745653,0.00024712321,0.000008969538,0.00030297737,0.00002852916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001989475,0.0000037260754,0.00042453533,0.0000011244165,0.0000042520523,0.000012789866,0.002774667,0.000005208185,0.0000047563444,0.996233,0.00018394206,0.00035000322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045113347,0.0005652278,0.44111577,0.00039387448,0.00033720527,0.00016364237,0.2242805,0.00031716056,0.0001270328,0.27948934,0.05191196,0.0008471453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8448965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.987443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71674365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012122227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059198984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105860024","doi":"","title":"What Judges Think of the Quality of Legal Representation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Quality (philosophy); Legal profession; Political science; Scope (computer science); Situated; Perception; Legal practice; Law; Practice of law; State (computer science); Legal education; Psychology; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06806131948915473,"score_gpt":0.39414375241371985,"score_spread":0.3260824329245651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105860024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7683502,0.00005153443,0.00001015196,0.0071237194,0.0006719641,0.00006359009,0.0000011781053,0.000007859153,0.2237198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987714,0.00006130218,0.00004690505,0.00010162001,0.00008393811,0.0000011549918,2.1671427e-7,4.8720767e-7,0.00093292916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994518,0.0000674378,0.00011949691,0.00005096515,0.00025985716,0.00005040914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961233,0.00011050016,0.00007288416,0.00007618589,0.00011675806,0.0000113549495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040804333,0.000021256052,0.0000643424,0.000006756398,0.00021119563,0.00001471632,0.000113623966,0.000024715955,0.00014995519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041559592,0.000012809616,0.000048063044,0.000113034424,0.00075863826,0.00021236537,0.00003697154,0.00004548769,0.0000027529172],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029535097,0.000015233729,0.04116981,0.0000010480927,0.000006379421,1.93286e-8,0.0027285449,4.9140675e-7,0.0021791474,0.9523518,0.0002929327,0.001251611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012380129,0.0000087220105,0.7397033,0.000010760141,0.000011579381,1.15092796e-7,0.04657071,0.0000012848199,0.011492199,0.18725461,0.014757748,0.00006515603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042945344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056993462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7650972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000046322793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008101944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9634278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107408700","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1267","title":"Furthering Substantive Equality Through Administrative Law: Charter Values in Education","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Obligation; Law; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Political science; Realm; Administrative law; Context (archaeology); Constitutional law; Sociology","score_opus":0.10517733094963949,"score_gpt":0.3927593526776382,"score_spread":0.2875820217279987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107408700","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01564473,0.11804848,0.00004312729,0.01924831,0.00055811164,0.0015677105,0.000013452309,0.00007152347,0.8448045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9610465,0.033806983,0.00011930927,0.0043875054,0.00022104764,0.00020857058,0.000006948555,0.0000051466977,0.00019796265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859893,0.00030323624,0.00030576345,0.00022337858,0.00030840532,0.0002602544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938196,0.00009032883,0.000095948235,0.00012314472,0.00025040557,0.000058240585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005781639,0.00012424994,0.0002954676,0.000009016928,0.00044284124,0.00005273154,0.00016778352,0.00004780236,0.0006958388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009773127,0.000106323554,0.00008253265,0.00021003048,0.0006605653,0.000555081,0.000033855704,0.00010979767,0.0003286804],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016001795,0.00006538662,0.0005092942,0.000097048534,0.000015023503,5.5006404e-7,0.0034968788,4.81264e-8,0.000010217713,0.99225545,0.0010663847,0.0024821272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009351961,0.000026742113,0.0025755374,0.002361153,0.000035184166,7.1108474e-7,0.0044150036,4.5992812e-7,0.000038199672,0.22503304,0.76517004,0.00025038872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051406156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02854123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9454018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012462371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002950448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98918533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107459657","doi":"10.4337/9781784719135.00010","title":"Constitutional dialogue and judicial supremacy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Legislature; Negotiation; Judicial review; Constitutional economics; Law; Constitutional review; Democracy; Constitutional law; Power (physics); Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.037557049989383404,"score_gpt":0.26855989544263026,"score_spread":0.23100284545324684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107459657","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000096739044,0.0010571969,0.00009627674,0.0021218907,0.0025936277,0.00035496123,0.00017234925,0.00022523057,0.9932817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21496046,0.0009335678,0.0005476251,0.0036986105,0.031646475,0.000065935434,0.00026755003,0.00007768543,0.7478021],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740016,0.00006956452,0.00040469243,0.0005875897,0.001019426,0.00051857735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984748,0.00026843272,0.00023947419,0.00019817178,0.0005235828,0.00029558974],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009952376,0.00036508634,0.00048570396,0.0001359763,0.0021741295,0.0011423039,0.0004690169,0.0006225997,0.0009440058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009002746,0.00037234894,0.00017712689,0.000037928137,0.009199617,0.00058451196,0.00035965448,0.00064160064,0.00025137726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001704271,0.0000060066727,0.00006770454,0.0000072938265,0.000111994144,0.000020138516,0.0016656523,7.668549e-8,0.000001510249,0.92864245,0.06097024,0.008489868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014486394,0.000019556013,0.000045932113,0.00011863459,0.000056081175,0.0000052353316,0.00013228005,2.3994187e-7,0.0000016047393,0.34573004,0.65345484,0.00029068888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036078703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0087949205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5924846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024078357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013773054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107815919","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-4469.2000.tb00152.x","title":"The Political Origins of Judicial Empowerment through Constitutionalization: Lessons from Four Constitutional Revolutions","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Social Inquiry","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":172,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Impartiality; Hegemony; Political science; Political economy; Power (physics); Empowerment; Law; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.10323040596705237,"score_gpt":0.38327742759781197,"score_spread":0.2800470216307596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107815919","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029562432,0.0018418401,0.0023763736,0.06701119,0.003286091,0.0005984191,0.00076748745,0.00019284274,0.89436334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99342954,0.00044320288,0.00016481445,0.0018305114,0.0038061182,0.000048124504,0.00005720932,0.000005697421,0.00021475262],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755794,0.00026870388,0.00047110443,0.00028712233,0.00084540504,0.00056970835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988452,0.00044505883,0.00011905389,0.00013277416,0.00033566475,0.00012224162],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000306644,0.00017156427,0.000283468,0.000013321761,0.006122368,0.00007384389,0.00032592833,0.00018038045,0.0011295094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016918754,0.00014872223,0.0002063575,0.00036170805,0.027191559,0.00027308884,0.00006315161,0.00019241987,0.00015002645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038251066,0.00010495384,0.0005603565,0.0000015131103,0.00010684153,0.000004807803,0.002449697,0.000014595722,0.000015377085,0.99159294,0.004698995,0.0004116792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002305663,0.0000110660285,0.0013242868,0.000020676762,0.00005277682,0.0000014268719,0.0034256876,0.0000015779164,0.000017072114,0.44493687,0.5498467,0.00013126564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036116645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009563343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9638671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062443607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015298906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108214397","doi":"10.1093/jla/2.1.227","title":"The Easy Core Case for Judicial Review","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal Analysis","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Judicial review; Grievance; Law and economics; Duty; Law; Political science; Judicial activism; Democracy; Economics; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03900316758973471,"score_gpt":0.35479657623184324,"score_spread":0.31579340864210853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108214397","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3709146,0.13360561,0.005658712,0.36498874,0.0055570016,0.001501131,0.00008230534,0.000057148744,0.11763473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890019,0.008436928,0.00004692021,0.0007718543,0.001267324,0.0000033056888,3.331238e-7,0.0000021638475,0.00046924283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893403,0.00012622081,0.00033081937,0.000048922462,0.00039134364,0.00016869242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982979,0.00066432654,0.0003367503,0.00010136596,0.0005310869,0.00006851718],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034613125,0.0000633136,0.00024761245,0.000043449858,0.0024490368,0.000050194314,0.00035029653,0.000027866341,0.00007359361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010546732,0.000028980568,0.00043311983,0.00065402617,0.00055242743,0.00010294377,0.000027870672,0.00023757333,0.0000054826114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026411348,0.00012285002,0.003510866,0.000029597724,0.0057601477,0.00027439932,0.0032123022,0.00011492678,0.0002047166,0.9020008,0.05063029,0.03387499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014313695,0.000052915533,0.00067551754,0.00004943305,0.0058479714,0.0002106763,0.0021599631,0.000042044765,0.0000071174118,0.0185902,0.97212166,0.000099371566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057377084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062432755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9214914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023284732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022304639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99884963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109204083","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781107300361.009","title":"Constitutions as Coordinating Devices","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.03249528065059652,"score_gpt":0.24388192782478826,"score_spread":0.21138664717419176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109204083","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004516839,0.00028987214,0.00043828547,0.00018507277,0.00042392677,0.00027662556,0.000100928795,0.00017528313,0.9980648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.047628086,0.00016755062,0.000035620185,0.00019572936,0.0004381544,8.565915e-7,0.000014998556,0.000010576984,0.9515084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987724,0.00006472001,0.00014935753,0.00034229556,0.00038036157,0.00029086144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989938,0.00016945886,0.00018907803,0.00016924435,0.00030614014,0.00017224616],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019820791,0.00022922522,0.00031587353,0.00010409314,0.0022138183,0.0000634845,0.00040205265,0.00028012192,0.000023872482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000078012046,0.0002736517,0.00017866584,0.000012874435,0.0023771427,0.00007423333,0.00023661583,0.00029632842,0.00011457479],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010089269,0.0000034912598,0.000010646464,0.000010916008,0.00010115291,0.00005936718,0.00013359533,0.0000010093727,0.0000012873654,0.9814264,0.017031696,0.0012103355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001673846,0.00001627036,0.0000120698105,0.00015990314,0.000170446,0.000003228005,0.00039981902,0.000001704096,0.0000050854455,0.0004799836,0.99826777,0.00031633995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010367401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005470675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9812361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002626052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005776755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110221353","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2167","title":"Panel selection on high courts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Panel data; Allocative efficiency; Political science; Law; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.04291580922159556,"score_gpt":0.2478318461141811,"score_spread":0.20491603689258553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110221353","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08189149,0.00029620406,0.000281595,0.0017767017,0.0005845853,0.000045983805,0.00000374983,0.000022188891,0.9150975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985981,0.00019570407,0.00018283993,0.000054965167,0.0002592823,1.0544711e-8,2.9402608e-7,9.238205e-7,0.00070789334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945736,0.00006276211,0.00004442981,0.000049878785,0.00028469143,0.00010088366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995735,0.000019132971,0.00006063385,0.000020537595,0.00021462196,0.00011155622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002315949,0.000034145698,0.00007174168,0.000007707544,0.0010167973,0.000012319637,0.00010032559,0.000033729873,0.00035445797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002582689,0.00003547474,0.00003773074,0.000018111396,0.0002703597,0.00023356368,0.000016152491,0.000059050642,0.000016135687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008285792,0.000050957944,0.0009395945,4.322455e-7,0.00003491551,0.000012086171,0.0047477144,0.000050413924,0.000010126356,0.9839835,0.008171838,0.0019155545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079308345,0.0002588705,0.00922885,0.000031195785,0.000045255845,0.000009572211,0.036223464,0.0000068737613,0.00002251572,0.033967376,0.9192803,0.00013264931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44261882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39752504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95001614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044407227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016645937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7820485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110772694","doi":"10.1017/s0008423900000214","title":"Two Forms of Democracy: A Response to Mendelsohn's “PublicBrokerage: Constitutional Reform and the Accommodation of Mass Publics”","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Plea; Representative democracy; Constitution; Separation of powers; Direct democracy; Government (linguistics); Political science; Publics; Liberal democracy; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021072243214037088,"score_gpt":0.30223744736878744,"score_spread":0.2811652041547503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110772694","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8076533,0.000095460266,0.00034271542,0.077541515,0.00016526223,0.00015451344,0.00004242001,0.000003091585,0.1140017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987895,0.000011236233,0.00031229714,0.0007167586,0.00009290935,0.0000015932103,2.4178277e-7,0.000001221169,0.000074228294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982773,0.0001242186,0.00036297226,0.00010020868,0.00062263914,0.0005126821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978964,0.0002827292,0.000113092065,0.00008279808,0.0006758994,0.000949101],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041512074,0.00006421535,0.00018552004,0.00023684803,0.0009911591,0.00009208896,0.00045670604,0.000031627693,0.00021546225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027493935,0.000041281328,0.000057815123,0.00073675625,0.0127614355,0.00059227535,0.00002391434,0.00012243396,0.0000033626086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010122253,0.0000062238432,0.0014714912,0.0000010750238,0.000007645279,0.0000033677609,0.0008576464,0.000011139759,0.00009113888,0.9959759,0.000047768543,0.0014253781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015504014,0.00020245748,0.1834147,0.00010439184,0.000044519606,0.00007893477,0.011750022,0.000057560836,0.00038485613,0.78316563,0.019027261,0.00021929272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10747375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045885317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2128103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005811084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008468858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111632808","doi":"10.1017/s0008423913000681","title":"Does Patronage Matter? Connecting Influences on Judicial Appointments with Judicial Decision Making","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Nomination; Scrutiny; Political science; Humanities; Appeal; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01567210068210743,"score_gpt":0.29630805499646445,"score_spread":0.280635954314357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111632808","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9539956,0.00003017029,0.00025527962,0.005929302,0.00095877016,0.00014530912,0.000008969369,0.000007686335,0.038668916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99672997,0.0000020747084,0.000485799,0.0020092241,0.00075165683,0.0000029036023,1.1676334e-7,0.000004559381,0.00001368395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99736184,0.00006772501,0.0003228642,0.000208221,0.0009184212,0.0011209495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977337,0.00031220893,0.00015482283,0.00007995574,0.0004930889,0.0012262238],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008877483,0.000120935896,0.00020480277,0.00027941001,0.0023273868,0.00036185188,0.00054883165,0.000051181825,0.0008106663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001398672,0.00007051652,0.000059312468,0.0005448538,0.0032829393,0.0006461288,0.00003207077,0.00021734636,0.00015245777],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001754532,0.00001820375,0.10710151,0.0000018028189,0.000014749042,0.00006640968,0.0012900631,0.000020385954,0.00004435597,0.8805095,0.00037453335,0.010540935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000262294,0.00027394437,0.7449382,0.00042634408,0.00002615918,0.00002632711,0.009322475,0.0000090941,0.0000692486,0.2417723,0.0026134537,0.0002601483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24404371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17980732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6387372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000705814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032472273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111831069","doi":"10.1017/s0008423907071338","title":"The Constitution of Law: Legality in a Time of Emergency","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Law; Constitution; Constitutionalism; Political science; Rule of law; Injustice; Opposition (politics); Prime minister; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.0364610590709913,"score_gpt":0.3370556872032805,"score_spread":0.3005946281322892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111831069","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7631443,0.00034145184,0.000114324386,0.0032359718,0.00060474087,0.000065521555,0.000008862332,0.000001294742,0.2324835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99976826,0.000010440128,0.000027036302,0.00006693024,0.0000954867,1.5122983e-7,3.16561e-8,4.9050533e-7,0.000031165862],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851274,0.00004838969,0.00037960726,0.00005650306,0.00048007496,0.0005226813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869144,0.00014834946,0.000115629955,0.00004921974,0.00044889314,0.0005464629],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042304522,0.00003621287,0.000111786525,0.00009972773,0.0006000831,0.000016380729,0.00039518872,0.000028075923,0.000055553555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019641635,0.000025822736,0.00004948388,0.00050590385,0.007907966,0.00017562947,0.000013627866,0.000091587266,0.0000031100865],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037320283,0.000007806119,0.022637596,9.0007075e-7,0.0000021861208,0.00000648761,0.00053349795,0.0000010492618,0.00016002721,0.97640586,0.000034532568,0.00020634549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015370539,0.00007435175,0.701844,0.00007174764,0.000012702399,0.000008955359,0.003580332,0.0000030969138,0.0011389427,0.27710786,0.015907383,0.0000969654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47729725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.58023745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69929796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031695265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043879966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111989169","doi":"10.1177/0964663907073444","title":"Framing Same-sex Marriage in Canada and the United States: Goodridge, Halpern and The National Boundaries of Political Discourse","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Lesbian; Politics; Sociology; Law; Statutory law; Gender studies; Human rights; Social movement; Political science; Homosexuality; Law reform","score_opus":0.027103830454355292,"score_gpt":0.33742894756400327,"score_spread":0.310325117109648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111989169","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9257332,0.004555997,0.000016197635,0.048758883,0.0002519567,0.0002913732,0.00005020566,0.00001163851,0.020330565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99761933,0.00055094966,0.0000057596676,0.0013347276,0.00034836467,0.000013151609,0.0000022505674,0.0000032008486,0.00012224067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850863,0.00020874762,0.00025081343,0.00012505805,0.00056392065,0.000342851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813884,0.0015181442,0.00007699056,0.000025722333,0.0001993182,0.000040957988],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015222759,0.000103836675,0.00029154873,0.000033691114,0.0027648634,0.0000791518,0.00010359465,0.000034002314,0.0000038742965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011174737,0.000060678303,0.000039067494,0.000265864,0.013886595,0.000081972066,0.00013127034,0.00016410579,2.5880087e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103319944,0.000009397067,0.015164736,0.0000059566582,0.000118508586,0.0000028720394,0.044378985,0.0000012598535,2.6918806e-7,0.93932533,0.0004924588,0.00039691664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017398358,0.000012216216,0.13888536,0.000030058085,0.00006239262,9.762366e-7,0.6077501,0.0000128676165,0.000003663807,0.20606558,0.04527382,0.00016312288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9862805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9936801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73325974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000326921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095023226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112265333","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1035","title":"Positive Obligations Under Sections 15 and 7 of the Charter: A Comment On Gosselin V. Québec","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Supreme court; Charter; Legitimacy; Political science; Entitlement (fair division); Jurisprudence; Law; Minor (academic); Law and economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.036374362089767215,"score_gpt":0.3042601532688276,"score_spread":0.2678857911790604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112265333","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0073722703,0.11799351,0.00013690082,0.43929884,0.0006009576,0.0017368855,0.00009688968,0.000047092155,0.43271664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96630186,0.018065115,0.000014968469,0.015336244,0.000042845597,0.000036567217,0.0000012688904,0.0000026704472,0.00019845694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923277,0.00020948789,0.000149867,0.000099220306,0.0002029625,0.00010570002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956733,0.000120697994,0.000059654394,0.00009452349,0.00011946423,0.000038321003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003344856,0.000063374435,0.00014562212,0.000008230725,0.0009013847,0.000011910806,0.0000766308,0.000021832551,0.000107361346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001146857,0.000043254633,0.000072335846,0.0001780726,0.0005800633,0.00004508869,0.00002004594,0.00006919266,0.000018860133],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.3114607e-7,0.000035699122,0.00040307318,0.000023071596,0.00002566282,9.9422046e-8,0.00037788652,0.0000010798291,0.0000039173788,0.99315345,0.005767926,0.0002074746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007295443,0.000021358848,0.0019763308,0.0009074851,0.00007295701,0.0000011241845,0.0004238268,2.7191996e-7,0.000036522957,0.020056998,0.9763616,0.00006857742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04562181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11082051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9730965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007083712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021161059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9607335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W211475630","doi":"","title":"State Action is Always Present","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social contract; Democracy; Law; Constitution; Law and economics; Political science; State (computer science); Liberal democracy; Tort; Sociology; Politics; Liability","score_opus":0.05852217317198346,"score_gpt":0.3253231613675265,"score_spread":0.26680098819554304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W211475630","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.063964814,0.0010311067,0.00045879945,0.052575614,0.0029854972,0.000075062664,0.000020273223,0.0000205789,0.8788683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992891,0.0019031247,0.00011473125,0.000980345,0.0014361332,0.0000011904706,5.24523e-7,0.0000030234103,0.0026699414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998849,0.000044148044,0.00025034507,0.000070710565,0.00066425867,0.000121584366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918467,0.000072069735,0.00020053874,0.00003669894,0.00042538822,0.00008065895],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002575189,0.000058430967,0.000100708814,0.000055376735,0.00033618705,0.00006323063,0.00024914063,0.000027160886,0.0013656731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009503026,0.000048768285,0.000108238346,0.00007824189,0.00031780355,0.0003303524,0.000030452107,0.00014611943,0.000096440264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050116203,0.00020042466,0.0017783185,0.0000021291132,0.00027750846,0.000035935907,0.0054001864,0.000063998785,0.00021529033,0.9327242,0.043951664,0.015300231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021726645,0.00003446121,0.001714703,0.000028648692,0.000012346847,0.00001768955,0.00041658038,0.000036537484,0.00031737966,0.045219015,0.9519162,0.00006912477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00071848807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048021876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92892617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011468616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004093966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116515736","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1185","title":"Charter Decisions in the McLachlin Era: Consensus and Ideology at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Political science; Adjudication; Law; Ideology; Voting; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Politics","score_opus":0.040883193096728776,"score_gpt":0.3069758374462566,"score_spread":0.26609264434952784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116515736","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05732245,0.27940387,0.000007568793,0.5243372,0.0004304028,0.0014448348,0.000073386,0.000020625403,0.13695973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9425153,0.04110653,0.000015921578,0.016069308,0.00009626341,0.000019226241,0.0000032418948,0.0000026065925,0.00017160337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982526,0.00042237257,0.00036182516,0.00018261666,0.0004744762,0.00030612404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866545,0.0008204258,0.00009716083,0.00020696505,0.00015007464,0.00005991901],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014936745,0.000118809985,0.0003498414,0.000012381854,0.0008248815,0.000013468674,0.000307559,0.000046833564,0.00016044025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054865004,0.000066648805,0.00006767476,0.00022469182,0.0010819688,0.000033820466,0.000057800797,0.00015361611,0.000009676136],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014498562,0.00004180342,0.0023158274,0.000032458312,0.000031967546,0.000024347399,0.00097154477,0.0000014631437,0.000020561152,0.8821431,0.10975983,0.004642615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015011842,0.000028439428,0.013711496,0.0004718727,0.000060539696,0.000015205131,0.0004695648,0.0000018702899,0.0000045534402,0.017893638,0.9670788,0.00011388495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32292762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9385792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8851929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000923681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052494806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.681581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117191932","doi":"10.1177/1468795x09102123","title":"Max Weber's Sociology of Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Classical Sociology","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Discernment; Rationalization (economics); Law; Bureaucracy; Casuistry; Sociology of law; Economic Justice; Epistemology; Social science; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.0396939773552259,"score_gpt":0.34710465131623236,"score_spread":0.30741067396100646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117191932","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64492184,0.0025617357,0.00039715652,0.11461678,0.0012601806,0.00009439433,0.0000056835634,0.000020933943,0.23612133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958982,0.00029156715,0.00021044274,0.0022799484,0.001175529,5.6691647e-7,4.158729e-7,0.0000020426794,0.00014130965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986093,0.000340718,0.00044181378,0.00008756884,0.00025199703,0.00026858182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987454,0.00044781194,0.0003733125,0.000046960966,0.0002815677,0.00010499266],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007077851,0.00008026801,0.00044678242,0.00003849252,0.00034284694,0.00000435224,0.00023652815,0.0002655583,0.0001494617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040096403,0.000061030936,0.00023958631,0.0000561578,0.0063709323,0.00008788885,0.000023703782,0.00034505074,0.000017061464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005007187,0.00009523938,0.00082047423,9.1814223e-7,0.00005785019,0.000012900233,0.003900209,0.0000030292897,0.00044479797,0.9899785,0.0028104319,0.0018255911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032502352,0.00044974606,0.0123125175,0.000010876987,0.00003628695,0.000008533808,0.001518362,8.7072345e-7,0.000041102125,0.77288646,0.21233797,0.000072286326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013913486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000096415286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35097638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000095250565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031366374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118309261","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v1n2p47","title":"Neo-Liberal Constitutionalism: Ideology, Government and the Rule of Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Liberalism; Ideology; Classical liberalism; Law; Liberal democracy; Politics; Law and economics; Rule of law; Doctrine; Political science; Limited government; Constitutional law; Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.023434594125997032,"score_gpt":0.2764229958505291,"score_spread":0.2529884017245321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118309261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.535672,0.004036932,0.000048345646,0.023869393,0.00037219623,0.00008250905,0.00003999772,0.0000031704612,0.43587545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966161,0.0008835358,0.000101550126,0.0019701198,0.0002504968,4.6880314e-7,1.11318585e-7,9.2744165e-7,0.00017666124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933493,0.000053452335,0.00018958763,0.000036431393,0.00027878003,0.00010681495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995121,0.00017573267,0.000120073026,0.00002407751,0.00010464021,0.00006338896],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031586367,0.00004136378,0.00015092155,0.000006398316,0.0006669667,0.00001144812,0.000057683752,0.000028661574,0.000014939458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006299556,0.000025695253,0.000045322085,0.000022814096,0.0071522673,0.00006940486,0.00003256122,0.000072142626,4.370997e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016643178,0.000015875165,0.0014797231,0.0000016850714,0.00003610773,0.000008544061,0.001557206,0.0000013941165,0.0000065300087,0.99660474,0.0002490324,0.000022514623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001093047,0.00005754133,0.006853624,0.00002804926,0.00006173128,0.00018687364,0.0013857745,0.0000028136749,0.000053474567,0.6694221,0.32078576,0.00006921291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008192669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000742642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46094412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026410302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011550507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99841183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118390776","doi":"10.1017/als.2013.9","title":"The Trial of Li Zhuang: Chinese Lawyers’ Collective Action against Populism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Wisconsin-Madison; Styrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete; American Bar Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Populism; Ideology; Legitimacy; Political science; Politics; Solidarity; Law; Accountability; Collective action; Autonomy; China; Legalism (Western philosophy); Mobilization; Public administration","score_opus":0.024852095963881472,"score_gpt":0.3081719559403569,"score_spread":0.2833198599764754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118390776","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5830179,0.0006069331,0.00022188215,0.013401747,0.0016268021,0.00020871848,0.0000040040823,0.000010173832,0.40090185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978533,0.00072996295,0.000052689527,0.0002922122,0.0008904279,0.0000012085271,1.6113988e-7,0.0000020249415,0.00017805486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921435,0.0001425376,0.00020066345,0.000052074767,0.0002766067,0.00011375472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934554,0.0001610631,0.00021956944,0.00003442532,0.00017866341,0.00006074803],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009525044,0.000055557786,0.00015961257,0.0000073226597,0.0016005886,0.00003866018,0.000095813404,0.000055186007,0.0000030170252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017499666,0.0000337349,0.00018782535,0.00011080384,0.0007937631,0.00012328349,0.000016900796,0.00013031051,5.114007e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013646947,0.00012801014,0.0016122975,0.000006893857,0.00036795708,0.0000018785616,0.08269645,0.0000046839414,0.000120522265,0.8945625,0.0036723276,0.015461813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.021322558,0.0012585546,0.025767162,0.00011796061,0.0001872051,0.000012533565,0.14170673,0.000028675206,0.00006497252,0.36655906,0.44261152,0.00036306237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029589882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008957769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5280034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047682654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001710779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119094321","doi":"10.1353/gso.2005.0015","title":"Reconsidering the Rule of Law: Reflections on Power, Politics, and Partisan Gerrymandering","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Good Society","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Gerrymandering; Rule of law; Redistricting; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Legislature; Law and economics; Due process; Public law; Constitutionalism; Politics; Private law; Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.14884785290208205,"score_gpt":0.34176169364824255,"score_spread":0.1929138407461605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119094321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67384994,0.00069646066,0.00007369203,0.03218789,0.00027968906,0.00017077813,0.0000067528063,0.00005543133,0.29267934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99823576,0.00032206174,0.00006952027,0.0011570693,0.00010546655,0.000006833591,1.4973446e-7,0.0000027633168,0.00010035843],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994677,0.000038259666,0.00009327498,0.00008113282,0.00015132598,0.00016835803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996816,0.0001354082,0.000039524886,0.00008089451,0.00003339995,0.0000291605],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003243673,0.00005174313,0.000075266624,0.0000037209363,0.0021649895,0.000026588894,0.00008866695,0.00003255191,0.00001022593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044878125,0.0000320017,0.00007297592,0.00007523449,0.0011911199,0.00004621203,0.00004423933,0.00010466149,0.0000044748904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010571512,0.000014794966,0.00011870895,0.0000012651674,0.000035674988,1.3311634e-7,0.06707464,0.00003374551,0.000101584235,0.9324574,0.000090622416,0.000070358925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003096639,0.000065119355,0.004551327,0.00005917865,0.000049272076,0.0000036046308,0.10179723,0.000001966506,0.0010581549,0.82963175,0.06231623,0.00015652885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008025055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036707714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32438582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005461344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007780669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99913406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119203085","doi":"10.1017/s0008423909090039","title":"The Unanimous Decisions of the Supreme Court of Canada as a Test of the Attitudinal Model","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unanimity; Supreme court; Voting; Test (biology); Perspective (graphical); Law; Political science; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03291715511497402,"score_gpt":0.2934792108388698,"score_spread":0.2605620557238958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119203085","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87753785,0.0003573153,0.00003934406,0.07339153,0.0005701171,0.00013683598,0.0000670229,0.0000010862049,0.04789892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992008,0.000010278142,0.000028092305,0.00055950944,0.000067294495,2.696503e-7,1.145916e-8,0.000001027385,0.00013271248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798423,0.00005690628,0.00033991816,0.00007510532,0.0009880881,0.00055574917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99781644,0.0005090707,0.00019314836,0.00014278188,0.00078319054,0.0005553899],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010966833,0.000059214035,0.00014751113,0.000038274808,0.0017455975,0.000025151407,0.001235489,0.000026160209,0.00001646918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0079237465,0.000028626744,0.00009671128,0.0006577194,0.00608324,0.00008436008,0.00004002957,0.00014843207,2.8878955e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021409744,0.000010367384,0.009424092,4.5271642e-7,0.000004249532,0.0000020817665,0.00034961867,0.000116435265,0.00019719206,0.98891425,0.0007795997,0.00019953282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012268938,0.00009855067,0.70768,0.00014952659,0.00003857554,0.000025784308,0.0037555993,0.00013937562,0.0010757786,0.28442383,0.0023996253,0.000090664464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8920266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.980635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7044904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048939034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03664386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119533214","doi":"10.1017/s1744552309990309","title":"‘Receiving’ the Swiss Civil Code: translating authority in early republican Turkey","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Promulgation; Civil code; Turkish; Ideology; Political science; Code (set theory); Law; Scholarship; Democracy; Modernization theory; Sociology; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.03847833127912919,"score_gpt":0.34042990501536435,"score_spread":0.30195157373623516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119533214","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8170255,0.00026573215,0.000062971056,0.04494068,0.0027799779,0.00009831374,0.000010135534,0.0000097034,0.134807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984686,0.00004294322,0.00006871211,0.0005029319,0.00083489105,0.0000036858141,3.9269756e-7,0.0000036782317,0.0000741621],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984044,0.00014665906,0.0004753024,0.0001040532,0.00068852364,0.00018108684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987481,0.00041872266,0.00022925645,0.000058136706,0.00048581578,0.00005995095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019484201,0.000076639335,0.00016156449,0.000090352456,0.00022554613,0.00013595133,0.0006360307,0.00007111733,0.00015782869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008204704,0.00005752391,0.00009752993,0.00016628193,0.00055842655,0.00031293774,0.000039870156,0.00062465336,0.0000036453782],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005456238,0.00006276983,0.06575359,6.297228e-7,0.00004002428,0.000047544123,0.018340128,0.000017240318,0.00019065625,0.90348727,0.00016071385,0.01184489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001997777,0.00009180056,0.33494553,0.0003221594,0.00002094018,0.00006889852,0.011105283,0.00010330481,0.00013856884,0.30274767,0.34811276,0.0003452994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036188703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48154825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6007396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000111406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028973233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9702294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120367809","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2347528","title":"The Manual of Official Procedure of the Government of Canada: An Expose","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"EXPOSE; Government (linguistics); Political science; Business","score_opus":0.012778608951360746,"score_gpt":0.23123096397455653,"score_spread":0.2184523550231958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120367809","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9710723,0.0015059188,0.000028956905,0.00091195153,0.00025107054,0.000114796625,0.000007682435,0.00000202539,0.02610531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988183,0.00075483107,0.000004006616,0.000019480041,0.00012842003,0.0000012899739,3.8785295e-8,0.0000020513194,0.00027161857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831074,0.00009210432,0.00021542089,0.000051921892,0.0007808021,0.00054903456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948967,0.00003535161,0.00025576854,0.00006406072,0.00012579208,0.000029389603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001049741,0.000050169518,0.00010120626,0.0000056130298,0.00063638075,0.000003176343,0.00035175247,0.000024585966,0.000012509717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013767566,0.000027712033,0.000058083748,0.00010455094,0.00047339246,0.000046389596,0.000034506866,0.00026644627,8.4318394e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007200496,0.00005947415,0.0063142385,0.0000016643484,0.00007172675,2.1484371e-7,0.003192848,0.0000030433941,0.00013194153,0.9863838,0.00008059072,0.003688486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047190156,0.0005505921,0.10524404,0.00006523824,0.000111676774,0.000016245593,0.20903277,0.000004479311,0.004686224,0.67358446,0.006047105,0.00018525588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21240407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9429592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7305551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004908063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011464445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9941396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120920000","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Conventions and Parliament","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Constitution; House of Commons; Law; Political science; Statutory law; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.036499002040341094,"score_gpt":0.30258961116596556,"score_spread":0.26609060912562443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120920000","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021471607,0.45609462,0.000055929835,0.15876856,0.0004638851,0.00095783523,0.00016758702,0.000056496192,0.38128793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73863196,0.22156058,0.00030181653,0.038310245,0.0005118352,0.000097848315,0.000038824783,0.0000034382313,0.0005434279],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991081,0.00006746055,0.00018378237,0.00016443973,0.00018514985,0.00029109186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993635,0.000030620875,0.00003684395,0.00007307668,0.00005430372,0.0004416999],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030229735,0.000089274465,0.00016272147,0.000029806148,0.00095767487,0.000029729088,0.0000950327,0.000029352297,0.0025564067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051027873,0.000089223795,0.00005545771,0.0001365892,0.0014084794,0.0001541013,0.00001664063,0.00006912188,0.0003264977],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.147485e-7,0.000017302695,0.0059987134,0.000043485103,0.000046180186,0.000008927543,0.00016749858,6.709448e-7,6.078835e-7,0.81738037,0.098519325,0.0778161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008361132,0.000006068966,0.00088665175,0.00044730885,0.000046195142,0.000005445642,0.00035243056,6.741913e-7,6.182917e-7,0.0014260384,0.99663275,0.00011217395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2759042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7464278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8981134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039960654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008056436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121312343","doi":"10.1111/j.0023-9216.2004.00057.x","title":"Judicial Power in Russia: Through the Prism of Administrative Justice","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Adjudication; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Impartiality; Principle of legality; State (computer science); Discretion; Power (physics); Exclusive jurisdiction; Judicial independence; Judicial review; Original jurisdiction; Supreme court","score_opus":0.07481347722011512,"score_gpt":0.3828701922453495,"score_spread":0.3080567150252344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121312343","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001390769,0.35462487,0.000047670328,0.054137867,0.0003518033,0.0007954712,0.000009630357,0.00003136415,0.5886106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55036473,0.4396421,0.00035072822,0.009386649,0.0001711187,0.000036378926,0.0000013218,0.0000035462542,0.000043399043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989354,0.000103900726,0.00027789897,0.0001403211,0.00033715996,0.00020533078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956995,0.000118201024,0.00012232574,0.00009774563,0.00006316845,0.00002859925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005294551,0.00009162431,0.00027578237,4.9330004e-7,0.0006148855,0.0000119023225,0.0002094823,0.000060524235,0.000062599094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012798667,0.00006070842,0.00021853049,0.0004062716,0.0014814575,0.00011975134,0.00004553419,0.00016241199,0.000026601343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017233059,0.00005019729,0.000033748518,0.00008315823,0.000026287331,0.0000015120042,0.0070621516,6.878932e-7,0.0000018369522,0.9904281,0.0019761214,0.00033448485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021807358,0.000040240862,0.0007944015,0.0016076794,0.00016636628,0.0000011243887,0.007442874,6.82611e-8,0.000012323089,0.15182716,0.8377544,0.0001352391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005696285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003481142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83860093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008956436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039213648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8611117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121799125","doi":"10.3138/utlj.1203","title":"Savigny’s theory of choice-of-law as a principle of ‘voluntary submission’","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Choice of law; Epistemology; Element (criminal law); Key (lock); Law; Sociology; Reflection (computer programming); Law and economics; Conflict of laws; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.02190900661073231,"score_gpt":0.27186577919541177,"score_spread":0.24995677258467947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121799125","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3362352,0.00078550127,0.00028045534,0.00020406608,0.00017425905,0.00006378813,0.000012447162,0.000005939511,0.66223836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989551,0.0002485876,0.00032472573,0.000025579167,0.00009027906,1.7482767e-8,4.7511665e-7,0.00000153924,0.00035374812],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913114,0.00016629502,0.00016068888,0.000067948,0.00035588632,0.00011805533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991205,0.00015127844,0.00028969158,0.000069610374,0.00028097534,0.00008796192],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005588304,0.000054093325,0.0002160426,0.000013899602,0.00056390127,0.0000030017445,0.00027407732,0.000052485633,0.0009780567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009014503,0.00005256748,0.0001313509,0.00002884084,0.0012976229,0.00023358702,0.00007741133,0.00006733852,0.000001708538],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010290636,0.00007957019,0.0053225495,0.000010088975,0.000072700204,0.0000017930175,0.0044449396,0.0000072380085,0.00035564028,0.9881497,0.00009096773,0.0013619007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015692151,0.00054982235,0.0665999,0.00040133792,0.00025086786,0.000006347762,0.028837439,0.000008233561,0.0013229635,0.13536404,0.764829,0.00026084104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35058728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1893215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85278565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001101632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015554343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122009549","doi":"10.1111/1540-5893.3703006","title":"Judicial Decisionmaking and the Use of Panels in the Canadian Supreme Court and the South African Appellate Division","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Assertion; Ideology; Law; Political science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.08489844829569734,"score_gpt":0.30094012456166824,"score_spread":0.2160416762659709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122009549","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03745482,0.7764859,0.00005084846,0.095180005,0.0003224091,0.0038772377,0.00003928743,0.000023136305,0.08656635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8225597,0.17196064,0.000032708365,0.0053836387,0.000034095672,0.000014531126,3.288636e-7,0.0000022008248,0.000012170417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984355,0.00065001816,0.00022864864,0.0001309894,0.00034587178,0.00020897147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876916,0.0009033558,0.00009913161,0.000119906596,0.000061851686,0.000046564775],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003442438,0.00008564354,0.00028485197,0.000001542665,0.0016478742,0.00008415353,0.00017205821,0.00004197406,0.000014769117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050267566,0.00003761558,0.00013178043,0.00029191806,0.0030982015,0.00006624604,0.000043266642,0.00014251728,0.0000022937224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049235805,0.0000048630077,0.0015250912,0.000022896229,0.000023097093,5.677631e-7,0.016522516,0.0000014219997,1.4737994e-7,0.9783902,0.0006305682,0.0028737127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075789564,0.000009068026,0.0065445406,0.0008653017,0.00015524059,0.000002496988,0.009012249,0.000015183904,3.1252284e-7,0.07122771,0.9112747,0.00013532495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22969815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3496517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9106441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035049772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015923998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122212394","doi":"10.1353/can.2007.0017","title":"Governing with the Charter: Legislative and Judicial Activism and Framer's Intent (review)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Historical Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Supreme court; Law; Judicial activism; Legislature; Politics; Judicial review; Judicial interpretation; Sociology","score_opus":0.02081082777139342,"score_gpt":0.24941440981143156,"score_spread":0.22860358204003814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122212394","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014444777,0.7969991,0.00002362735,0.11167471,0.00010710334,0.0003399836,0.0000064589867,0.000010583131,0.09069398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20588823,0.77616465,0.00002247642,0.015436752,0.0005447928,0.00007860947,0.0000032773335,0.000008107076,0.0018531247],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992035,0.00009135361,0.00010887169,0.00016245976,0.00021193798,0.00022186991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952245,0.00008923408,0.00006869332,0.000061726874,0.00006912952,0.0001887437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028486183,0.00009435877,0.00025448823,0.000016813161,0.0007650159,0.00001456421,0.000082726685,0.000027860024,0.00004937226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019194925,0.000060402064,0.000035344143,0.00019119958,0.0003109391,0.00006783944,0.000016087126,0.00013713495,0.000013879093],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003964127,0.0000140099,0.0015955196,0.0003674409,0.00004883926,0.000033079352,0.0009400386,6.829872e-8,9.919994e-7,0.16561043,0.65380716,0.17757848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032733904,0.000018205203,0.0016702387,0.0013624813,0.000069292946,0.0000028320226,0.00004568048,1.8954637e-7,3.079927e-8,0.00045591875,0.99625075,0.00009163568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56740624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6454739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34244362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012333954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034332057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5883961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122426454","doi":"10.1093/icon/mol002","title":"Prologue: North American constitutionalism?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Prologue; Constitutionalism; Political science; History; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.014854806903517002,"score_gpt":0.2973220546938847,"score_spread":0.2824672477903677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122426454","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11969706,0.0010086953,0.01092743,0.02528047,0.006256339,0.0002807284,0.00025302774,0.000099545774,0.8361967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941554,0.00011668433,0.0010510195,0.0013137119,0.0031809385,0.0000063492807,0.0000296748,0.000003668179,0.00014252048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99738187,0.00011318332,0.0006142019,0.00015811369,0.001463921,0.00026873965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970115,0.00023310009,0.00051580905,0.00006683444,0.00204728,0.00012550646],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000501249,0.00014580111,0.00026074107,0.00017692476,0.00067509303,0.00011651902,0.0005728018,0.00004724251,0.00015767533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002668012,0.00013318959,0.00021281847,0.00027621357,0.012183332,0.0005231558,0.00006093473,0.00022137054,0.00007218795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009482452,0.00015068766,0.032032117,7.22663e-7,0.00014862773,0.00014626425,0.00006246638,0.00051498733,0.000025445774,0.96276784,0.003334496,0.0007215134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005444401,0.000043544573,0.021937784,0.000029682391,0.000038383398,0.00019883626,0.00014806357,0.0000032364685,0.00004580881,0.08154646,0.8952832,0.0001805212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063722064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00961514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89194876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003271274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016311563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9905049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124152619","doi":"10.1017/s0008423904030951","title":"New Questions about an Old Concept: The Supreme Court of Canada's Judicial Independence Decisions","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Humanities; Judicial independence; Political science; Law; Art","score_opus":0.027911736148422038,"score_gpt":0.3058213408867011,"score_spread":0.2779096047382791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124152619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8227796,0.0010862176,0.0033378405,0.11114057,0.0035143783,0.0003241322,0.00015241661,0.000013814496,0.057651047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99789274,0.000011647242,0.00030313391,0.0011200089,0.00059699116,5.9461775e-7,1.7949877e-7,0.0000024179778,0.00007230874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973225,0.00007089638,0.00034549175,0.00013692827,0.0012228194,0.000901351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99602914,0.00021922309,0.00012243322,0.00012522045,0.0008749012,0.0026291069],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012598988,0.00008397394,0.00017211688,0.000115074195,0.0021889333,0.00009902906,0.0010085949,0.000054090542,0.00017687296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044380515,0.0000614875,0.000057548335,0.0007135901,0.005066946,0.00036451156,0.000027626522,0.00026467384,0.0000027878548],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018605444,0.00000699063,0.002116905,2.0083675e-7,0.000004611772,0.000026445277,0.0013093787,0.00010194089,0.0000232484,0.9950236,0.0007142899,0.00067049614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030564205,0.00014190483,0.5241324,0.0001670902,0.000039106988,0.00006517181,0.009310839,0.0000069896837,0.0002450505,0.45012861,0.0152455885,0.00021161094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99620306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.544895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013028883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09798737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124336077","doi":"10.1017/s000712340500013x","title":"Interpreting a Bill of Rights: The Importance of Legislative Rights Review","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Legislature; Legislation; Judgement; Law and economics; Bill of rights; Law; Politics; Fundamental rights; Parliament; Human rights; Premise; State (computer science); Welfare rights; Judicial review; Social rights; Reservation of rights; Right to property; Sociology","score_opus":0.0211615574922424,"score_gpt":0.3325517148328495,"score_spread":0.3113901573406071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124336077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36479378,0.052694917,0.00046671723,0.04872003,0.0006726942,0.00046758688,0.000042653217,0.000016974613,0.53212464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99771225,0.000912764,0.00037436924,0.0007017221,0.00026383053,0.0000010115114,4.8776574e-8,0.0000010966712,0.000032898137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978555,0.00013215626,0.00058480725,0.00010756777,0.0009178925,0.00040208572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822533,0.00032620292,0.00038496542,0.00006513399,0.00081124017,0.00018712773],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027865458,0.000058271013,0.0002639546,0.00004039651,0.0006515577,0.000032383705,0.00058160926,0.00002372566,0.00011346022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024327985,0.000035079785,0.00012584473,0.00053124153,0.006000887,0.0004277707,0.00007319123,0.00016433129,0.0000027736148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038403896,0.00005062377,0.0010648356,0.000009180688,0.000011663909,0.000013249454,0.0007270758,8.706712e-7,0.000056741068,0.99491537,0.00072505284,0.0024214827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000382642,0.0002209518,0.04215971,0.010252717,0.0001272545,0.00048745004,0.002102596,0.00002060989,0.0013052156,0.84425426,0.09838395,0.0003026357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020846086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057632984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6329185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013721472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005446046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124841371","doi":"10.1017/s0008423910000673","title":"Charter Creep: Creeping Precommitment and the Threat to Liberal Republicanism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Precommitment; Humanities; Political science; Charter; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.019934611659881182,"score_gpt":0.2946486068241662,"score_spread":0.274713995164285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124841371","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7228875,0.0001284704,0.00018447326,0.18147904,0.001271154,0.00019800614,0.000007032661,0.0000066196726,0.09383766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952545,0.000004775991,0.00028278376,0.0037941872,0.000525955,0.0000026553323,2.8620118e-8,0.0000016287305,0.00013348965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986188,0.000050187373,0.00017119656,0.00011086859,0.00036987377,0.00067911955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99760145,0.00015225526,0.000043054664,0.00007951475,0.00028287372,0.0018408649],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001974591,0.00005695457,0.00011975052,0.00010638737,0.0016635346,0.0002690875,0.00043582625,0.00003024163,0.00013953033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016327987,0.000036070785,0.000043690787,0.00029561555,0.005606661,0.00026218191,0.00002989282,0.00021298857,0.000009365925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029134878,0.000002662615,0.0029090696,2.5454074e-7,0.000003504347,0.0000057015436,0.0016943525,1.6680696e-7,0.000025036028,0.99259603,0.00030533774,0.002454984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051324756,0.00010719614,0.5452313,0.00004051887,0.000029188875,0.00009510306,0.004523433,0.000014328996,0.000121756515,0.3757106,0.07339806,0.00021529123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1661989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35611787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6168854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001642545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028182545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124915316","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1143","title":"Working with Bertha Wilson: Perspectives on Liberty, Judicial Decision-Making and a Judge’s Role","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law; Legitimacy; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.03866725957518929,"score_gpt":0.30039193458137065,"score_spread":0.26172467500618135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124915316","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025160728,0.43902284,0.00011436457,0.008853449,0.00032636864,0.00089098467,0.000004981726,0.00014802846,0.52547824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8764032,0.12070507,0.000375473,0.001968385,0.0004293868,0.000030399251,7.270088e-7,0.000009837346,0.00007752777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834275,0.000118640324,0.00021769418,0.00036572493,0.000626304,0.00032890018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919045,0.00030928207,0.0000949809,0.00014308855,0.00015871906,0.000103497725],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004144441,0.00017843966,0.00039929556,0.000030933843,0.0018823844,0.000045407844,0.00018485928,0.000057047062,0.00014145022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025761302,0.00013391182,0.00009113184,0.0003317607,0.0011343976,0.00016851703,0.00007738247,0.0001679729,0.000049017905],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000722317,0.00009841885,0.00575166,0.000042432643,0.00008594499,0.000066884255,0.006680635,0.0000022924035,0.0000015405633,0.94014496,0.0031313258,0.04392165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022368177,0.00011476259,0.0025517824,0.008277402,0.000102092235,0.000032845135,0.0018807227,0.0000024624078,0.0000010985725,0.020708274,0.9657601,0.00034475754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001895371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007853845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9626288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000094851035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019110959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125272190","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v6n2p116","title":"Reaching Out: Understanding the Puzzle of Cross-Party Nominations to the Lower United States Federal Courts","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nomination; NOMINATE; Opposition (politics); Political science; Politics; Law; State (computer science); Democracy; Divided government; Primary election; Public administration","score_opus":0.058339100055649656,"score_gpt":0.3371470957235586,"score_spread":0.2788079956679089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125272190","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8622449,0.00036082757,0.001031241,0.07511888,0.0007739608,0.0001656816,0.000024413064,0.000004860448,0.060275204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99817675,0.00009701801,0.000027518032,0.0011485225,0.00022990843,9.4736373e-7,4.1846027e-7,0.0000017769607,0.00031714258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937797,0.00006090122,0.00017605837,0.000033584703,0.0002109383,0.00014057051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928296,0.00025260757,0.00010788276,0.000035234225,0.0002537592,0.00006753327],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050529937,0.00004064167,0.00008279857,0.000022621784,0.0016354218,0.00018084742,0.00010230726,0.000018858282,0.000023532568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001221389,0.000021341943,0.000039787883,0.00006225719,0.00065776997,0.0001274078,0.000030278217,0.00009393321,0.0000020680536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002365104,0.000019438763,0.0009365193,0.0000010969048,0.000024818739,7.1920033e-7,0.008162185,0.000096253665,0.000008526512,0.9890376,0.0016721762,0.00003835561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021793322,0.00010279649,0.009589028,0.00005814869,0.000038587365,0.0000056140652,0.04841088,0.000104860126,0.000021281001,0.650468,0.29088897,0.000093907736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009597332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046358067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33856955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000717385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006009218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125365623","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1062","title":"Constitutional Legitimacy and Responsibility: Confronting Allegations of Bias After Wewaykum Indian Band v. Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Constitution; Certiorari; Impartiality; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.03613483300809244,"score_gpt":0.29369336116453676,"score_spread":0.2575585281564443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125365623","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1232407,0.38016042,0.00025744826,0.094710596,0.0011646817,0.0028313198,0.00065610657,0.000105239094,0.39687347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878199,0.009676333,0.00015396225,0.0021514928,0.00009592881,0.000035935882,0.000008939122,0.000002456044,0.000055035052],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986767,0.0001379388,0.0003362581,0.000198046,0.00043024463,0.0002208191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992206,0.0001714608,0.00010344769,0.00011279879,0.0002776396,0.00011406071],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007516592,0.00010885606,0.0003016397,0.000015014787,0.000639278,0.000024902065,0.0001061024,0.000039072387,0.00020704645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065622857,0.0000990611,0.00006161334,0.00017556788,0.002504337,0.00017102971,0.000039700906,0.00009377631,0.0000061110222],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009191982,0.000020551866,0.0035452489,0.00016164871,0.000035973735,0.000015451846,0.0002729694,0.0000020904463,0.0000044640346,0.9945502,0.00085781113,0.00052439136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024389118,0.000013067981,0.0034719491,0.0018467421,0.00007043351,0.0000055779874,0.00035623345,1.3645196e-7,0.00002656093,0.016291378,0.97750723,0.00016676665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6789183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9380582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97825885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016403706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026025963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9227334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125589068","doi":"10.24908/eoe-ese-rse.v5i0.641","title":"Crossing the Line: Homophobic Speech and Public School Teachers","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Encounters in Theory and History of Education","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Sexual orientation; Duty; Freedom of expression; Law; Political science; Homosexuality; Set (abstract data type); Enforcement; Constitutional right; Position (finance); Sociology; Human rights; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Business; Constitution","score_opus":0.02514187869114551,"score_gpt":0.2932884427131373,"score_spread":0.2681465640219918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125589068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92203933,0.013888552,0.000015183423,0.00070840225,0.0008250887,0.000075126954,4.7971525e-7,0.0000074750615,0.062440343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962934,0.0006804519,0.000034155422,0.00027335892,0.00015654546,0.000008679658,5.343655e-7,0.0000017534423,0.00255109],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994737,0.00015101861,0.00009648837,0.00008983426,0.00010157986,0.0000874099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996833,0.00013638526,0.00005219627,0.000048520065,0.000043291675,0.00003631214],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007645267,0.00004396288,0.00006642623,0.000058657006,0.00063957635,0.000016618747,0.00006935762,0.000031816802,0.00005930337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003571104,0.000036212852,0.000015121576,0.00007588936,0.0029354969,0.00016366235,0.000013479468,0.00008471261,0.000002115583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054588916,0.00020086045,0.09627296,0.000012875926,0.000020445728,0.0000016469933,0.31268615,0.0000011768375,0.00033129787,0.54984057,0.010157748,0.030419663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028169178,0.000050486487,0.1105472,0.0001089134,0.000023399936,0.000015691065,0.19159746,0.000002181504,0.000013470634,0.16807245,0.5290556,0.00023145058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027828284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011886014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51889783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029878688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001032345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997779},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127368234","doi":"10.22201/cisan.24487228e.2011.2.138","title":"The Economic Crisis of 2008-2009: Governance and Consumer Democracy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Corporate governance; Politics; Financial crisis; Interpretation (philosophy); Political economy; Representation (politics); Safeguard; Political science; Economics; Business; Law and economics; Economic policy; Law; Finance; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.21719771021457845,"score_gpt":0.5014606382950257,"score_spread":0.2842629280804473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127368234","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7372439,0.11657957,0.00003394549,0.0017465425,0.0010389844,0.00041670178,0.000099077035,0.000020119089,0.14282118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.889246,0.110222965,0.000045793822,0.00015123562,0.000112856396,0.000010208726,3.352014e-7,0.000007065553,0.00020357012],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985071,0.00017631023,0.00048772452,0.00020617053,0.00035206098,0.00027066257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984923,0.00038041573,0.0006353408,0.00016532802,0.00019603777,0.00013059036],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011240751,0.00013699332,0.0003795395,0.00007286036,0.001209419,0.0002863087,0.0013009334,0.000057495792,0.0030761773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030301372,0.00010308101,0.00010014053,0.00024420337,0.0011991557,0.0010867072,0.00043527785,0.0001443465,0.000019284791],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016178018,0.00008765312,0.7879448,0.00001247393,0.00031488665,0.000008033997,0.001852026,0.000005432947,0.00045071752,0.073677704,0.11364081,0.021843672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001966633,0.0000051672487,0.80133396,0.0000802616,0.00006343918,0.0000020903674,0.0010867533,0.0000025611264,0.0010034252,0.11141417,0.08461817,0.00019335063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057721905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055489843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15200208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008277811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034446918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99783516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127507417","doi":"10.1093/icon/mor067","title":"The Canadian Charter of Rights and the minister of justice: Weak-form review within a constitutional Charter of Rights","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Political science; Legislature; Judicial review; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Parliament","score_opus":0.047762443208032204,"score_gpt":0.3517338849698267,"score_spread":0.3039714417617945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127507417","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000069437224,0.8708109,0.000065449574,0.003074444,0.003049176,0.00055430084,0.0005060015,0.0000035401347,0.1219292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12136283,0.8763967,0.000106437874,0.0004621485,0.0014013773,0.00003037681,0.00003465093,0.0000059917484,0.00019949609],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951929,0.00041348406,0.002064727,0.00018708732,0.0018274243,0.00031437323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99319553,0.0012915494,0.002535507,0.00017533972,0.0025732133,0.00022886453],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027982297,0.00032041167,0.0013799876,0.0002199596,0.0012269672,0.000066373395,0.0010249278,0.00021739234,0.00022531096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035956607,0.00016905415,0.00073834904,0.00022556931,0.030217232,0.00036243463,0.000106543084,0.00047821944,0.000015891896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000643904,0.000056393208,0.000013573595,0.0005554698,0.0010691672,0.000011668878,0.0002620471,7.474482e-7,1.9837037e-7,0.99379724,0.0012660167,0.002903073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052656076,0.00002576378,0.00001122485,0.011987974,0.0016154569,0.00033922793,0.000057895304,5.954923e-7,0.0000019871281,0.0484425,0.936822,0.00016879228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019024853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049416985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94535476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031534123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005443095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9875075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129502429","doi":"10.1177/0032329205275193","title":"Social Movements and Judicial Empowerment: Courts, Public Policy, and Lesbian and Gay Organizing in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Society","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Lesbian; Charter; Empowerment; Politics; Political science; Gay rights; Social movement; Human rights; Public policy; Public administration; Gender studies; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.028643222515590202,"score_gpt":0.2951094067377347,"score_spread":0.2664661842221445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129502429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95128906,0.0009830354,0.0000035554358,0.033670843,0.000081453894,0.00012438407,0.000057394413,0.000017678733,0.013772595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940715,0.0011190444,0.00004418001,0.00369416,0.0009597959,0.000004228577,0.0000030839262,0.0000061512474,0.00009784284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987974,0.000043619,0.00016359918,0.00018375662,0.0003108349,0.00050077954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962044,0.00006558362,0.000047295664,0.00003294303,0.000061026367,0.00017273526],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022630932,0.00010764822,0.00016124336,0.000023370825,0.0013247029,0.0000882394,0.00006732016,0.000064556065,0.000009994216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009111408,0.000116464056,0.000023292183,0.0001480829,0.0007730279,0.00013986045,0.00012189932,0.00011774777,6.334705e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013568067,0.000029660521,0.19238278,0.00000890039,0.000046414756,0.0000020908706,0.026451863,2.020458e-7,0.000015899335,0.7754066,0.0031741697,0.0024800287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001267683,0.000023544233,0.46226388,0.000034748384,0.000038887847,0.0000037511923,0.06507953,0.00005361316,0.000023098199,0.121735156,0.34889913,0.0005769726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9369704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92417955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65367144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009968774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021189048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131317104","doi":"10.3138/utlj.020614-02ra","title":"The work of Lon Fuller: A promising direction for jurisprudence in the twenty-first century","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Principle of legality; Legitimacy; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Perspective (graphical); Law and economics; Sociology; History; Politics; Art","score_opus":0.011890624605049945,"score_gpt":0.2366738668175516,"score_spread":0.22478324221250165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131317104","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.269814,0.010479592,0.004407858,0.021393027,0.0022556304,0.0010115043,0.000009899711,0.000028511738,0.6906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99816895,0.0014688646,0.00013330767,0.00001815921,0.00013855934,1.4288692e-7,1.1666978e-7,8.042249e-7,0.00007110778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994175,0.00012260144,0.00008129097,0.000049544527,0.00021540985,0.00011367128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994595,0.00025389058,0.00012290796,0.00004111947,0.00009969571,0.000022856437],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009154821,0.000033958397,0.00007777121,0.000006404697,0.002212883,0.000020602478,0.00023515259,0.000025821697,0.00001989217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008074542,0.000023500099,0.000069778274,0.00004205052,0.0004636405,0.00015370687,0.000023130748,0.000058710993,4.4531677e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035482977,0.00011020035,0.007799437,0.000008847757,0.00005967396,0.0000019010588,0.043332495,0.000050253064,0.00002210804,0.9187501,0.0016804569,0.027829694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036488276,0.000070141905,0.02246515,0.00010386962,0.000030487732,0.0000013955929,0.040728632,0.000009765201,0.0000065791637,0.004987257,0.9311732,0.00005865997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.069218576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47784096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9294927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015639004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044348355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132631441","doi":"10.1017/s0008197300000052","title":"Standing under the Human Rights Act 1998: Theories of Rights Enforcement &amp; the Nature of Public Law Adjudication","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Adjudication; Jurisdiction; Political science; Human rights; Enforcement; Context (archaeology); Convention; Test (biology); Law and economics; Order (exchange); Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.028750558317221266,"score_gpt":0.30496848903460483,"score_spread":0.27621793071738354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132631441","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2804988,0.0015967563,0.00009955879,0.009524754,0.00032213825,0.00023951703,0.000018770872,0.000016700928,0.707683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99819785,0.00017876159,0.0000064531137,0.0004333978,0.00062086113,0.000005959485,0.0000031481497,0.0000036935962,0.0005498876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980675,0.00046334174,0.00033260527,0.00009701999,0.00076774147,0.00027178056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898034,0.0003095218,0.00027917483,0.00020448909,0.00017126444,0.00005522122],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001991346,0.00011233082,0.0001703905,0.000020479847,0.008447142,0.00012351065,0.0006361897,0.00007323769,0.00031003225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016097669,0.000046263387,0.00013845671,0.00023528609,0.0033013108,0.00022807147,0.000047398964,0.0004402215,0.00001430481],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016645023,0.000027079936,0.000061643455,0.0000012890575,0.00011494933,4.9535817e-7,0.0020541793,0.000020861948,0.000046392954,0.9965015,0.0009619554,0.00019303076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016531274,0.00002333938,0.0010813064,0.000038747865,0.00006303916,0.000009875482,0.0017443856,0.0000012255204,0.0002713055,0.53542554,0.4611001,0.00007581339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02541522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051540725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71769905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010363073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008434997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132852309","doi":"10.1017/s2045381712000032","title":"Constitutionalism in an old key: Legality and constituent power","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Constitutionalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Principle of legality; Legal positivism; Positivism; Law; Ambivalence; Political science; Power (physics); Constitutional theory; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Epistemology; Legal research; Sociology; Legal realism; Constitutional law; Democracy; Philosophy; Politics; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.037486787777682336,"score_gpt":0.3369695124857261,"score_spread":0.29948272470804377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132852309","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45070502,0.005948007,0.0007363046,0.005372511,0.0025429635,0.0005882853,0.00041347055,0.00020369339,0.53348976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967999,0.0001588217,0.00043367373,0.0019617807,0.00048851565,0.000042586445,0.000041023057,0.000003632507,0.0000700857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973646,0.0002891558,0.00042071223,0.00040418253,0.0007386131,0.00078278413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887884,0.0001175702,0.00010114895,0.00017758754,0.00019700281,0.0005278671],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011735137,0.00025794373,0.00032508164,0.00008704134,0.0013352175,0.0001245214,0.00023317922,0.00021138065,0.0003118242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044652334,0.00026246705,0.00008485473,0.00048044187,0.0073660817,0.0012950916,0.00012714825,0.000209717,0.00012767247],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020862222,0.00016115276,0.24361056,0.0000023924738,0.000022384464,0.000015012284,0.0006718455,0.0000057666907,0.000009521669,0.7547701,0.0005054722,0.00020491377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011187125,0.00002927938,0.32053474,0.00008560385,0.000052412037,0.00010379542,0.0024092577,0.000003829689,0.000007818008,0.14386894,0.53111696,0.00066865544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014218405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063826805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6109012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005724864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011953703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133710840","doi":"","title":"Adieu to constitutional elitism","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Constitution; European union; Political science; Democracy; Democratic deficit; Elitism; Constitutional review; Politics; Treaty; Law; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.048931891401957764,"score_gpt":0.35777506001605985,"score_spread":0.3088431686141021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133710840","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044953093,0.00033524257,0.000017040846,0.0028984305,0.0010159938,0.000715417,0.00016316342,0.00005505384,0.94984657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98528016,0.0048783747,0.0006010731,0.00039492702,0.001740706,0.00037844104,0.00006012053,0.00001550244,0.0066507123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972196,0.0002679336,0.00043892252,0.0006844783,0.00052787253,0.00086117076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986887,0.00043532715,0.000079241174,0.00029976707,0.00023829013,0.0002586899],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018068677,0.00020393796,0.0003833265,0.00035041262,0.0010233633,0.00016160589,0.0006103343,0.00034917306,0.00018849857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078929093,0.00023640708,0.00014786076,0.00019275346,0.0036914041,0.00007791862,0.00091501616,0.000941196,0.00010849857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003876906,0.00012640137,0.009511401,0.00001998722,0.00006917328,0.000053367086,0.00074989855,0.004120292,0.000006734174,0.88492703,0.002147631,0.09822928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021030474,0.000024630936,0.015543597,0.00019101566,0.000006429442,0.000001510876,0.0007871884,0.000043881908,0.0000042978336,0.060459092,0.9223306,0.00039741737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012038498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025451045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9431959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011991864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031644993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134839478","doi":"10.3138/cjls.26.1.001","title":"L'influence du contexte économique et idéologique sur la conception de l'être humain par le droit et le juge constitutionnels: les cas canadien, indien et sud-africain","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027545209502814246,"score_gpt":0.24783270906308455,"score_spread":0.2202874995602703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134839478","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89993125,0.004854154,0.00061214436,0.026743561,0.00078712974,0.00038969968,0.00068056176,0.000025092206,0.06597639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98487836,0.0040241177,0.00037429985,0.0095044095,0.00038570227,0.000028691878,0.000023074283,0.0000337079,0.0007476196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99591976,0.001305081,0.0008575294,0.00049320934,0.00013923385,0.0012852008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955184,0.00091878395,0.00071541325,0.00019684748,0.0007550064,0.0018955733],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005050682,0.00044751022,0.0008667437,0.00010261793,0.0024682074,0.00020349454,0.0005337322,0.00070680893,0.00010731702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00095365837,0.0005365326,0.0005007226,0.00031658186,0.008708849,0.0011827442,0.0000612659,0.0012395752,0.0000046308105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015336347,0.00005506667,0.006835751,0.000046221765,0.00031821683,0.00056645926,0.09622812,0.00024952565,0.00001398637,0.89359117,0.001266315,0.0008138596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003242016,0.00072087126,0.048716273,0.0014076406,0.00045721375,0.0020131795,0.17978624,0.00013106976,0.000046230234,0.48372197,0.2779782,0.001779092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.969437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40986916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029141426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018522944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135872986","doi":"10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053006.183906","title":"The Judicialization of Mega-Politics and the Rise of Political Courts","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Scope (computer science); Law and economics; Jurisprudence; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.025470387812628587,"score_gpt":0.35042843041777383,"score_spread":0.32495804260514527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135872986","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20706613,0.1449873,0.00049958506,0.20050731,0.0009450676,0.0021792334,0.00029369103,0.000050874412,0.44347078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98041075,0.018575775,0.000034208726,0.00081651524,0.00009883461,0.00000589017,2.6411976e-7,0.0000017547372,0.000056021992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975587,0.00024447733,0.00046969697,0.00013924106,0.0009954629,0.00059242366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974712,0.0011123318,0.00014926735,0.00014837412,0.0008925141,0.00022627118],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00261457,0.00007676009,0.00031727136,0.000027861337,0.0011100868,0.000009172967,0.00040883227,0.00003146409,0.000013140316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009419806,0.00004087814,0.00008664272,0.0004837174,0.026486583,0.00013668336,0.00014013571,0.00007236996,0.0000019181336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048260476,0.00002368963,0.00072754064,0.00007354501,0.0000056797994,4.2646383e-7,0.0005624877,5.7571864e-8,0.0000046964506,0.99802727,0.00021402018,0.00035578976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050754973,0.00015920955,0.04918292,0.0018469859,0.00017801658,0.000016449287,0.006426206,0.000029792955,0.00058840855,0.88141096,0.05941969,0.0002338135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020651763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021612504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7733446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008600593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009202383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99892426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135894233","doi":"","title":"The Protection of the Rights of Homosexuals Under the International Law of Human Rights: European Perspectives","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; International human rights law; Political science; Law; Fundamental rights; Linguistic rights; Charter; Right to property; Ex post facto law; Convention; Reservation of rights; Sexual orientation; Sociology","score_opus":0.02172082428904606,"score_gpt":0.2747506803166186,"score_spread":0.25302985602757255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135894233","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32719183,0.00029177035,0.000083036764,0.0055814707,0.0005455505,0.00036534856,0.000014026253,0.00002166046,0.6659053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99818027,0.0000099538565,0.000011089333,0.00008251245,0.00037066895,0.000010731974,4.6507245e-7,0.0000032860669,0.0013310041],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854594,0.00046447758,0.00023969328,0.0001262686,0.00050017255,0.00012346821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990957,0.00016806812,0.00022952721,0.00019426529,0.00028701493,0.000025438647],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009991676,0.00007518603,0.00011969113,0.000012635655,0.002321195,0.000037746093,0.00058526656,0.000030837327,0.0000626607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000977098,0.000034925597,0.000100238045,0.00014558171,0.0028778831,0.000105137944,0.00011126818,0.00013546614,0.000011824506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008627745,0.000044107088,0.00019559433,0.0000018269906,0.000059501046,6.734941e-8,0.0019718523,0.000011129649,0.0008684976,0.99657077,0.00019891353,0.00006911538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026384715,0.0000754226,0.013457687,0.00006728341,0.0000346758,6.127835e-7,0.0075350218,0.0000041348803,0.0038957885,0.7334927,0.24106832,0.00010456129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053448547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.122257166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67098844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047797766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036023088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136017761","doi":"","title":"Reconciling Parliamentary Sovereignty and Judicial Review: On The Theoretical and Historical Origins of the Israeli Legislative Override Power","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings constitutional law quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Sovereignty; Legislature; Judicial review; Parliamentary sovereignty; Legislation; Political science; Law; Constitutionalism; Popular sovereignty; Constitutional theory; Supreme court; Politics; Charter; Judicial interpretation; Separation of powers; Constitutional law; Democracy","score_opus":0.04084824629556707,"score_gpt":0.25498193038083716,"score_spread":0.2141336840852701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136017761","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.070141695,0.0044045458,0.00024002042,0.011656103,0.0009103121,0.0005318954,0.00008704016,0.000041482446,0.9119869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99592483,0.0002565801,0.00008574695,0.0035219144,0.00015995941,0.000017892975,9.342475e-7,0.000002939574,0.00002919496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985712,0.0001950571,0.00029973,0.00024125802,0.00046890602,0.00022381237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893117,0.00056725607,0.0001596109,0.00010825629,0.00015358563,0.00008012606],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070445257,0.00014387266,0.00023256824,0.000017030852,0.0014465656,0.000021771713,0.00016761087,0.00005974789,0.00034689796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003782185,0.00008649739,0.000088386376,0.00012591002,0.011001917,0.0001412484,0.00004357601,0.0002164948,0.000007570578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003758032,0.00004035842,0.0012465459,0.000008022497,0.000034288914,0.0000024118058,0.0022232975,1.1254891e-7,0.000011773999,0.9950257,0.000697891,0.0006720115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043430278,0.00036706598,0.0035133506,0.0012121019,0.00015319874,0.000025338779,0.0036971353,0.000007027432,0.000041552827,0.78796315,0.20224518,0.0003405828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010253048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009500723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92578316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026094433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032451702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136775099","doi":"10.1017/s0008423905040485","title":"The Political Foundations of Support for Same-Sex Marriage in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Realm; Legislature; Framing (construction); Supreme court; Sociology; Humanities; Law; Ethnology; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.03089683373900302,"score_gpt":0.3176381630610328,"score_spread":0.2867413293220298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136775099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5287133,0.00028902365,0.00040030072,0.258304,0.0019521505,0.00043774996,0.00018752729,0.000004652716,0.20971133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981775,0.0000037213704,0.00015674265,0.0011830524,0.00034738737,0.0000022096183,1.9793094e-7,0.0000015835652,0.00012760237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808013,0.00004034828,0.0003230272,0.00007995021,0.00044314814,0.0010333736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977947,0.0005041849,0.00006488786,0.000059539347,0.00036651545,0.0012102122],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00116056,0.00004979492,0.0001243644,0.000093399336,0.0009959961,0.00005636078,0.0004564241,0.000021704864,0.00008549418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031636267,0.00003706827,0.00004702969,0.0003370215,0.0031162628,0.00017272665,0.000013508755,0.000101446756,0.0000021372498],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016011551,0.0000038061858,0.011484251,6.9317014e-7,0.0000026081952,0.000004370637,0.00018730226,0.0000041217904,0.0000062145245,0.98674285,0.00046375577,0.0010984206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041032123,0.00011046417,0.351033,0.00004782174,0.000026294396,0.000027954693,0.03334884,0.00007626529,0.0002831011,0.33790818,0.2764938,0.00023398714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99388176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6488347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002659298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057806924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136862874","doi":"10.1017/s0008423908080451","title":"Terms of Entitlement: Is there a Distinctly Canadian “Rights Talk”?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Charter; Politics; Humanities; Political science; Fundamental rights; Supreme court; Sociology; Ethnology; Law; Human rights; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02784867928101374,"score_gpt":0.2804549233684228,"score_spread":0.25260624408740906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136862874","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6688908,0.00020332969,0.000019337607,0.007266656,0.00050098595,0.000068320514,0.000070417154,0.0000027527283,0.32297742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988546,0.000010435005,0.000055089564,0.0005342261,0.00025075907,5.387457e-7,2.0847995e-7,0.0000018550736,0.00029230752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982001,0.000031375323,0.00024652746,0.000107969856,0.00053083827,0.00088315626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99699837,0.000043127027,0.00008097762,0.000072612806,0.0003465889,0.0024583228],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005215797,0.00006889817,0.0001482805,0.00024039912,0.0017179085,0.000042913278,0.0005043495,0.000039128045,0.0010617535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044155808,0.00005466766,0.000073463845,0.00049602217,0.0055005946,0.00023313984,0.000013263065,0.000108795524,0.000027397506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.924181e-7,0.0000060362167,0.03412867,0.0000010598402,0.0000067128476,0.0001366479,0.0014678764,2.3704779e-7,0.000016175298,0.9630803,0.0010109041,0.00014458934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018342635,0.00008978636,0.65214735,0.000085051775,0.000023422721,0.00009893124,0.0017840972,0.000003003734,0.00042273125,0.13654678,0.20840706,0.00020833653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97538835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98121005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82653356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007176674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010760501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137292845","doi":"","title":"Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":477,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Constitutionalism; Treaty; Political science; Adjudication; Commonwealth; Scrutiny; Human rights; Law; Underpinning; European union; Politics; Law and economics; Democracy; Sociology; Economics; International trade","score_opus":0.039657105448221444,"score_gpt":0.30975065739938334,"score_spread":0.2700935519511619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137292845","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2790807,0.00045444132,0.0007263678,0.00516016,0.0001889173,0.0000965046,0.00001143411,0.0000813524,0.71420014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983257,0.00017786192,0.0003201344,0.00052174827,0.00018490072,0.000005101943,0.0000018538469,5.214893e-7,0.00046216854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938416,0.000027734888,0.000090008565,0.00010827627,0.00026127946,0.00012854498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99976325,0.000026990092,0.000021162648,0.000026982989,0.00009269302,0.00006893639],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017142098,0.000043285447,0.000067543966,0.0000071641057,0.0013876093,0.000010907942,0.000039574577,0.000029503653,0.00017634849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013452461,0.0000371212,0.000021343723,0.00010949555,0.0018828699,0.0001052843,0.000027298585,0.00002768058,0.000031783457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018331303,0.00001004592,0.18809387,4.672733e-7,0.000006147798,0.0000061658357,0.00017480005,5.2370206e-7,0.0000018237791,0.8103101,0.0011560868,0.00023809657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018142175,0.000007608598,0.5934633,0.0000076621445,0.0000076957585,0.00004455089,0.0008543409,0.000003067816,0.00000570439,0.19665898,0.20862696,0.00013868502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011106149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024564518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.719245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039382937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138503724","doi":"10.35534/ltwc.0304019","title":"What is a political constitution?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Traditions of the West and China","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.028679439295641183,"score_gpt":0.2962887946986943,"score_spread":0.2676093554030531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138503724","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51723194,0.000434005,0.000014488766,0.1700371,0.001449308,0.00018552039,0.000116484116,0.00009327642,0.3104379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982648,0.000488694,0.000009614274,0.00043114054,0.00015927876,0.000007832131,0.0000026471482,0.000001256287,0.0006347499],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945074,0.000037232174,0.000087737884,0.000081455226,0.0001772504,0.00016556414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997719,0.000055705157,0.000021339074,0.00006739022,0.000026292633,0.000057358546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011138051,0.00004703051,0.00007672329,0.00002914514,0.0011097362,0.000060568374,0.0001115906,0.000030383795,0.00006951114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038015674,0.0000340837,0.000062559346,0.00028351377,0.0018105261,0.00025426786,0.000024226227,0.00006952862,0.000034774737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015034017,0.00001936907,0.0009849278,0.0000023473017,0.00001201554,9.652476e-7,0.00140409,7.717209e-7,0.000011498122,0.9947854,0.0025797123,0.00019735508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016314948,0.00001922024,0.3046603,0.00009180284,0.00004037897,0.000005824446,0.0071754125,0.0000093440285,0.000052470103,0.5484432,0.1392311,0.000107781496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033644172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007185769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48103285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018387838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011083042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8535305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139164249","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1287","title":"Constructive Unamendability in Canada and the United States","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Federalism; Politics; Political science; Constructive; Constitutional amendment; Pluralism (philosophy); Law; Democracy; Supreme court; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.019163934244301347,"score_gpt":0.2725322793528965,"score_spread":0.2533683451085951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139164249","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26721758,0.18830937,0.00009782938,0.19279385,0.0013404678,0.0034265802,0.00011644172,0.00008583091,0.34661207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9536905,0.041031778,0.000012141968,0.005184151,0.00004262023,0.000022223667,0.000004389856,0.0000015340358,0.00001062239],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889135,0.00046087845,0.00016784754,0.0001152702,0.00021006075,0.00015457033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927014,0.00045575967,0.00004571045,0.000078246216,0.00010467327,0.000045492598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011141634,0.00006428007,0.00022621467,0.0000070461297,0.00036921864,0.000013237708,0.00010491985,0.000013007679,0.000073719086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041827443,0.00004036663,0.00002339831,0.00020439847,0.0016052035,0.000042586664,0.000039028004,0.000080205056,0.0000031066236],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047939147,0.0000030972471,0.007477447,0.00004839746,0.000009711725,4.7461748e-7,0.00027110172,0.000001517165,3.801592e-8,0.989653,0.00057367573,0.00195676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002135316,0.0000036700944,0.0026493089,0.00035365886,0.000023746485,6.0659886e-7,0.000743172,0.000015631198,3.6286852e-7,0.086859636,0.90906173,0.00007494049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99579555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99756855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90848804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017169441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046146018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5914439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139320702","doi":"","title":"Judging the Rules of Belonging","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Norm (philosophy); Position (finance); Power (physics); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.023654768402321242,"score_gpt":0.2639713372556077,"score_spread":0.24031656885328642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139320702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7065383,0.010506633,0.003267349,0.003611352,0.00045076286,0.00011673619,0.0000012677181,0.00003322418,0.27547434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99555457,0.0038460854,0.00003856216,0.00004840757,0.00026795192,0.0000013448636,8.553491e-8,0.0000024966357,0.00024052056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986696,0.00007257059,0.00012431308,0.000053434756,0.00022448748,0.000855549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99972576,0.000043414064,0.00008764921,0.00004065588,0.00007652991,0.00002600027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001659574,0.00004610877,0.00007616271,0.000031199666,0.0011274396,0.000012629729,0.00022577336,0.000022067556,0.000047006575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009382264,0.000030218762,0.000066985944,0.000100722806,0.0003777253,0.0000975954,0.000024665105,0.0004225774,0.000013592201],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005693562,0.000011301791,0.0051044463,2.874024e-7,0.000050083883,5.204265e-7,0.003888078,6.234481e-7,0.000012933285,0.9779471,0.000013946034,0.012964992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065418484,0.000027461609,0.0053819725,0.000010679429,0.000019552806,0.000012982434,0.020011757,9.703754e-7,0.000030103776,0.9715729,0.0028182606,0.000047934933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004984737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007912904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28901622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017430894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001323976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8671468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140086801","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2011.00859.x","title":"The Death of Socio‐Economic Rights","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Human rights; Fundamental rights; De facto; Globalization; Law and economics; Hegemony; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.09085241872378821,"score_gpt":0.31817011782237875,"score_spread":0.22731769909859054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140086801","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011375864,0.14545982,0.000059025893,0.0012157635,0.00015743363,0.00019448336,0.0000035557455,0.000017511236,0.85175484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9402338,0.059032194,0.000036182504,0.0003914712,0.000075939155,0.000016761243,3.0304608e-7,0.0000016661307,0.00021166196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949276,0.000067156514,0.00014660817,0.00007492881,0.000099874786,0.00011866724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973935,0.000048214235,0.0000655421,0.0000848128,0.000034756384,0.000027350163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037581596,0.00004552565,0.00014042406,0.000002614086,0.0007940578,0.0000061526275,0.00017427481,0.000019074727,0.00013126289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015212039,0.000027131118,0.00008091424,0.000019152358,0.0005763418,0.00005221316,0.000028429937,0.000031915024,0.000116444935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.178253e-7,0.0000063680022,0.0001863372,0.000015053333,0.000015002433,2.6136877e-7,0.00046159324,2.95267e-8,2.6034695e-7,0.995536,0.00025836893,0.0035197902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016455782,0.0000038847097,0.00020356565,0.00012704547,0.00001967245,1.3439556e-7,0.000014956981,6.905508e-7,0.000004477156,0.5263214,0.47325513,0.00003257775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029462835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00847786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9390962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033037217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006634245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97700006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140687383","doi":"10.1177/0920203x09105126","title":"Judicial Interpretation of China's Supreme People's Court as “Secondary Law” with Special Reference to Criminal Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"China Information","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Judicial independence; Political science; Precedent; Majority opinion; Law of the case; Certiorari; Court of record; Sociology; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.011410276127160796,"score_gpt":0.26495080960316064,"score_spread":0.25354053347599986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140687383","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27416724,0.000012543681,0.00084624527,0.0017181865,0.00019704769,0.00023897602,0.000017127444,0.000039658666,0.722763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99812084,0.000017594988,0.00020486431,0.0011421833,0.00043504126,0.000008820797,0.000043072505,0.0000020681946,0.000025483207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988533,0.0000377556,0.00030959354,0.00009751129,0.0004994589,0.00020233718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994468,0.000021987968,0.00016047891,0.00008141122,0.00020537387,0.000083955296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002603795,0.000113215654,0.00018389165,0.00007512456,0.000652514,0.000082459526,0.00017312147,0.000065753964,0.00018723616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009199194,0.00009970368,0.000040005783,0.00024829624,0.00028056354,0.001466028,0.000027663034,0.00013238283,0.00011877532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002328592,0.000026807991,0.000110016306,0.000008415001,0.000009565548,5.399707e-7,0.042472776,0.0000722917,0.000013322346,0.93959594,0.00048435785,0.016973086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014557794,0.0021754985,0.62358457,0.00037011306,0.00015412798,0.000014494469,0.022548446,0.00014916077,0.00070664444,0.19398908,0.15399522,0.00085686665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016209891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019461442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7456069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010360047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023048674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99843085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140912625","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x10000279","title":"Judging Alone: Reflections on the Importance of Women on the Court","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Economic Justice; Position (finance); Law; Political science; Solitude; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.09326621534670063,"score_gpt":0.3628824125046064,"score_spread":0.26961619715790575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140912625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58961874,0.000019997542,0.000009263114,0.020695543,0.00033634139,0.00008491938,0.000008209768,0.00001601573,0.389211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99453706,0.000023857321,0.000013093703,0.0044221194,0.00047538022,0.000024871713,3.4045078e-7,0.0000033263223,0.0004999606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915695,0.000055192286,0.000101368845,0.000089917594,0.0002901065,0.0003064513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993128,0.0003616707,0.000048869806,0.0001405408,0.000082935665,0.000053182208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053516595,0.0000574532,0.00007187463,0.000018426423,0.0012651377,0.000020714931,0.00016552919,0.000034608358,0.00024867617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040665243,0.000032792555,0.000040082065,0.00012679839,0.0007045094,0.00002173139,0.000025658055,0.0001947272,0.00004172898],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015501643,0.000023883671,0.0031122805,5.4204213e-7,0.000020957372,3.4719508e-7,0.00848039,0.000001972195,0.00009574575,0.98659164,0.0016434791,0.000027233571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006453692,0.000026220609,0.027997555,0.000007035627,0.000014976993,7.6394736e-7,0.02926692,0.0000042216707,0.0003305078,0.7220665,0.220113,0.00010777277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015443974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001478083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40491834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010381679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020195241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9730544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141053676","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00557.x","title":"Who Controls the Content of Supreme Court Opinions?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Supreme court; Concurrence; Majority opinion; Political science; Concurring opinion; Economic Justice; Judicial opinion; Power (physics); Law; Dissenting opinion; Empirical research; Supreme Court Decisions; Court of record; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.08020318407841402,"score_gpt":0.3343116820694302,"score_spread":0.25410849799101615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141053676","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85265994,0.00020937072,0.001039352,0.026987009,0.0006578311,0.0001609064,0.00001427578,0.000010244393,0.11826105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99869263,0.00003580546,0.0002430238,0.00079274987,0.00020444428,0.000001170733,3.0165197e-8,0.0000014551547,0.000028679398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981186,0.00012891607,0.00033041468,0.00008849314,0.00082143646,0.0005121723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830323,0.00032811734,0.0002604942,0.00008402191,0.0006824457,0.0003416631],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018327169,0.00006064031,0.00024196769,0.00005796894,0.0005502538,0.000024156301,0.00064670754,0.000012376974,0.00006475565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001545946,0.00003515232,0.000102072314,0.00049434917,0.01873428,0.0002059558,0.000060382026,0.00012019822,0.0000060148823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002036719,0.000041442745,0.010065437,3.5112853e-7,0.000014229363,0.0000021685698,0.0029284921,2.529759e-7,0.00016240685,0.9851172,0.00007752605,0.0015701364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003628396,0.00095046835,0.79573107,0.000082849874,0.00005809787,0.00003201019,0.09441985,0.000008190419,0.0008602835,0.100760244,0.0065640965,0.00016998603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020381333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021718063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.884357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010764841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091428624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98614204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141122689","doi":"10.1017/s0008423908080712","title":"Governing with the Charter: Legislative and Judicial Activism and Framers' Intent, James B. Kelly, Vancouver and Toronto: UBC Press, 2005, pp. xii, 336.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legislature; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.018447258563238214,"score_gpt":0.25831706606014143,"score_spread":0.23986980749690323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141122689","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88173085,0.007537917,0.0001834941,0.017066093,0.00059223326,0.000208415,0.000027507018,0.000008249189,0.09264521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99824196,0.00050671014,0.00004892928,0.0006896155,0.00033402024,0.0000011890298,4.39999e-8,0.000002465202,0.00017503605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986427,0.00005356792,0.00011502426,0.00015261176,0.00040682915,0.0006292754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854606,0.00016612811,0.00008286885,0.000044142107,0.00017622698,0.0009845478],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004955706,0.00009107339,0.00015853856,0.000025227095,0.001947717,0.000114579045,0.00017807735,0.00003596388,0.000036730922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000388038,0.000058046942,0.00002067851,0.00010092219,0.009808484,0.00075280044,0.000035819092,0.00018051466,6.4787065e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029654497,0.000014344909,0.03603168,0.0000035143605,0.000046011188,0.00009952595,0.026840782,0.0000012246095,0.00003655472,0.92183506,0.011478728,0.0035829428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007470986,0.00041348848,0.5250201,0.00018159776,0.000096261756,0.0002603202,0.07012113,0.00004613372,0.00005180802,0.011327536,0.39126036,0.00047412407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4440888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67838603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9105075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028211452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019210657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141149083","doi":"10.1017/s000842390277813x","title":"Ghosts of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council: Group Politics and Charter Litigation in Canadian Political Science","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Charter; Supreme court; Legitimacy; Law; Judicial review; Interest group","score_opus":0.03817996828434821,"score_gpt":0.2649548808491777,"score_spread":0.22677491256482946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141149083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9270455,0.00014147931,0.0000026723085,0.033040434,0.00063156226,0.00014496742,0.000044648987,0.0000015438052,0.038947195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983542,0.000005507985,0.000021663494,0.0013905518,0.00019554653,9.401863e-7,4.318752e-8,0.0000026286532,0.000028910186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960934,0.0001166939,0.0004151675,0.00015811702,0.0013742711,0.0018423655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99615216,0.00015655479,0.00013415347,0.00015584315,0.0009520734,0.0024491865],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030152586,0.00009336403,0.0001987628,0.00024288692,0.0015961565,0.00008402378,0.0009929781,0.00006316398,0.000051491552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006154713,0.00006268323,0.00006961376,0.0014179265,0.023370031,0.00033530543,0.00006525729,0.00026035248,0.0000019217791],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.1778e-7,0.000009672976,0.120640025,0.0000024764688,0.0000019169845,0.0000034293769,0.0016459,5.9265074e-7,0.00008016308,0.8774347,0.00007564529,0.00010498681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013126998,0.000040350667,0.9168582,0.00011287075,0.000013358799,0.000021590085,0.002177666,0.00004250993,0.00020347878,0.077795945,0.0025141696,0.000088597015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94934815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9665434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79963875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035283812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024037791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142018700","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1015","title":"The Charter's Influence Around the World","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Charter; Political science; Constitution; Doctrine; Conservatism; Proportionality (law); Judicial review; Politics","score_opus":0.019451224226226967,"score_gpt":0.2746025546167328,"score_spread":0.2551513303905058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142018700","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010845024,0.0011919944,0.000022067748,0.04862339,0.00059173704,0.0001400914,9.3251674e-7,0.0000213426,0.9385634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944899,0.00046386864,0.000022444246,0.0016530245,0.0012132309,0.00001886813,1.0508923e-7,0.0000033300528,0.002135207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987869,0.00015700421,0.00017658848,0.00008333798,0.00045241186,0.00034373987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991996,0.00029359118,0.000101326885,0.00009955477,0.00020180269,0.000104117076],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007047354,0.00007807872,0.00008059216,0.0000125428105,0.009041348,0.00069097034,0.00047636815,0.00002617352,0.0002174247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000099812845,0.000038346392,0.00007540844,0.0001557131,0.0013950425,0.00036142525,0.000055112243,0.0002970298,0.0004168882],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002406406,0.000008854873,0.001162141,2.2651152e-7,0.000025972688,0.000002565557,0.000596601,0.0000094795205,0.000014243095,0.99096364,0.0037442998,0.0034695463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000071033806,0.0000100744355,0.008497881,0.000016735426,0.000010338936,0.000012888972,0.0028003198,0.000004424229,0.000006547157,0.5812062,0.4072911,0.000072462164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.123866804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.56574816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9836449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000627463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009817609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9922488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142108321","doi":"10.1017/s0008423904040041","title":"Expanding the ‘Dialogue’ Debate: Federal Government Responses to Lower Court Charter Decisions","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Appeal; Charter; Supreme court; Political science; Government (linguistics); Legislature; Law; Meaning (existential); Original meaning; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.03999940244685713,"score_gpt":0.3192115705877166,"score_spread":0.2792121681408595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142108321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87151176,0.00008698271,0.0008616885,0.10495537,0.0014532472,0.000118409356,0.000026119562,0.0000049189125,0.020981511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949932,0.0000071505733,0.00017051729,0.0041595623,0.0005515042,0.0000021727114,4.416056e-8,0.0000023599644,0.000113473754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976823,0.000059234648,0.00022189462,0.00012678413,0.0009770793,0.00093276286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99740696,0.00028618122,0.00004909161,0.00008473099,0.00025577823,0.0019172472],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016093745,0.00007463438,0.00011829209,0.000086613,0.003023272,0.00027486615,0.0005869419,0.000031604006,0.000095841846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004852983,0.00004890342,0.00007005349,0.00047244676,0.0026397128,0.00024815157,0.00003690172,0.00014510856,0.000055490826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011993361,0.000010544472,0.0027982371,1.4536406e-7,0.0000049391238,0.000086313565,0.0018775281,0.000011818172,0.00010700308,0.99370426,0.00080570375,0.00058149383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000507628,0.00038949584,0.67701006,0.00022662016,0.00003294133,0.00015741902,0.021842359,0.0000015192863,0.00055865897,0.21356194,0.085316494,0.00039487734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10395353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23346354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78014237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017963084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064671943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99916524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142348581","doi":"10.1017/s0008423902778165","title":"Partisanship as Political Science: A Reply to Rainer Knopff and F. L. Morton","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Politics; Charter; Political science; Position (finance); Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.04719938729891881,"score_gpt":0.32533493167130423,"score_spread":0.2781355443723854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142348581","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67266595,0.0001933994,0.000026993992,0.10497615,0.000574613,0.000111174595,0.000008250904,0.000009686269,0.22143376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99027336,0.000006067341,0.00016096629,0.008627792,0.00056101754,0.0000018835873,3.367166e-8,0.0000031927743,0.0003656705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959794,0.000058628353,0.00030308927,0.0002735141,0.0010776247,0.0023077296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910478,0.00014655961,0.000051540304,0.00011427419,0.00064764766,0.007992196],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025075257,0.00010428449,0.00018841622,0.00043210917,0.0024298164,0.0003658138,0.00064404256,0.000041849606,0.0004454024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010124823,0.000087752676,0.00005152208,0.0015054535,0.014286926,0.0005520658,0.000057648882,0.00020163224,0.000089193396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016436661,0.000009441384,0.00844826,8.6551916e-7,0.0000023374143,0.000067281166,0.0012694026,5.510859e-7,0.000098995166,0.98827904,0.0011214953,0.0007007118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003439252,0.0005174508,0.49071562,0.00014711088,0.00004848554,0.00041568396,0.013744579,0.00004656279,0.0006648068,0.35938087,0.13338357,0.0005913246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25903174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045768455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62889814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011137882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069421763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143262688","doi":"10.1017/s0008423910000764","title":"Strategic Legitimacy Cultivation at the Supreme Court of Canada: Quebec<i>Secession Reference</i>and Beyond","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Supreme court; Political science; Context (archaeology); Secession; Law; Politics; Humanities; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.033147481482620436,"score_gpt":0.2890302107596631,"score_spread":0.2558827292770427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143262688","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9017708,0.00009212636,0.0000050941508,0.021167008,0.00045843003,0.000055549997,0.000019678811,0.0000013948996,0.07642993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991054,0.0000067398505,0.00002994358,0.0004428351,0.00018871205,6.3622656e-7,3.6887235e-7,0.0000014009,0.0002239497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848825,0.00004508193,0.00022023928,0.00009887626,0.00060272746,0.00054484146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815995,0.00015073149,0.000110442736,0.00006489302,0.0005516731,0.0009623167],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010348215,0.00006148654,0.00011457369,0.000060385384,0.0016121586,0.00007542827,0.00034848094,0.000039104227,0.00019103222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00090328703,0.00003992344,0.00002272779,0.0002969079,0.0051908316,0.00024780794,0.000026639074,0.00021582893,0.0000012174669],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022089453,0.000003025498,0.006396119,0.0000011003247,0.0000025821284,0.0000060302723,0.00044385393,0.0000010668031,0.0011011352,0.9911909,0.0006283889,0.00022356978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029696076,0.00007918203,0.7481158,0.000074066586,0.000034832767,0.000060288166,0.01769045,0.000022640923,0.0016878016,0.18328793,0.048385926,0.00026413053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9911618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.807903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005406947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02353715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143589951","doi":"10.1017/s0008423913000504","title":"Governmental Interventions and Judicial Decision Making: The Supreme Court of Canada in the Age of the Charter","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Intervention (counseling); Humanities; Judicial review; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.028397993028168447,"score_gpt":0.293648021804498,"score_spread":0.2652500287763296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143589951","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9593164,0.00015129651,0.000020142681,0.024972897,0.00035377537,0.00011476071,0.000016683196,2.914675e-7,0.015053756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99913085,0.0000030062931,0.000012354663,0.0007579603,0.0000805493,0.0000010712789,2.3021233e-8,7.2116995e-7,0.000013453144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986722,0.000081485676,0.00023279435,0.000052872085,0.0006288629,0.0003317963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993049,0.00023759158,0.000086138,0.00006223523,0.00013696421,0.0001721507],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010628023,0.000038139875,0.00008787625,0.000033886034,0.0006583203,0.00004642007,0.0005670535,0.000015356885,0.0000793287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010827448,0.000018521712,0.00005236679,0.00029419948,0.0037379784,0.00011615264,0.00003533981,0.00011161293,4.1429502e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013796155,0.000008358457,0.036997106,0.0000015176238,0.000003869649,0.0000054169564,0.0014950121,0.0000010593285,0.00003227161,0.9590452,0.002001182,0.00040763844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005285376,0.000021294669,0.9460922,0.00010679768,0.000008085691,0.000009421317,0.012327433,0.000004481739,0.00001371025,0.039857637,0.0014781231,0.000027967677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9329768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.989416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91918755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045540574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032374025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99897325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143819820","doi":"10.3138/cras.38.1.101","title":"The War against Terror as War against the Constitution","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of American Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Law; Supreme court; Rhetorical question; Constitution; Ideology; Conviction; Argumentation theory; Compromise; Political science; Pragmatism; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Politics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03979855664064228,"score_gpt":0.3216858850643154,"score_spread":0.2818873284236731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143819820","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018057743,0.6520371,0.0000021050466,0.06592417,0.000568125,0.0007245526,0.00004088922,0.000035121317,0.2626102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43948355,0.5511081,0.00001242019,0.009018298,0.00015477109,0.000051572395,0.0000020149055,0.000003019634,0.00016622791],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998351,0.00024498272,0.00035651246,0.00019342064,0.00040515276,0.00044893794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861044,0.00030675044,0.00024443053,0.00022177634,0.0004310799,0.00018551771],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068170734,0.00016081518,0.00045058594,0.000042033782,0.005033122,0.000007860328,0.00039954085,0.000021699045,0.0000119864335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018734775,0.00009035927,0.00016806611,0.00065771345,0.013963,0.00006954244,0.000060216695,0.0001323239,0.00008285994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018414597,0.000051582894,0.008942772,0.0004183337,0.0013807641,0.00018385328,0.029579671,0.000008723126,0.000011486491,0.21814111,0.419579,0.3216843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044519493,0.000025747706,0.0016169663,0.0007289729,0.00004760012,0.0000040793666,0.03620258,2.6123442e-7,0.0000023937723,0.0003038277,0.96089184,0.00013122574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16884089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3484188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5413128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032627347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019347019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144899749","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.291168","title":"Coalition Governments and Comparative Constitutional Design","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Public administration; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.05880997341948491,"score_gpt":0.31342134829786006,"score_spread":0.25461137487837515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144899749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18952616,0.01555377,0.3300975,0.011474622,0.00089815987,0.0006050504,0.000015245837,0.000101836624,0.45172766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887651,0.009856012,0.00009143062,0.00013353105,0.0003300253,0.00000433959,0.0000010133975,0.000001196563,0.0008173461],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984279,0.0001483807,0.00012170563,0.000099849785,0.0003658865,0.0008362444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996727,0.00008277345,0.00006728227,0.000023123748,0.000082862556,0.00007127525],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011029742,0.000071112925,0.00010373751,0.000026064637,0.001459982,0.000050290077,0.000079718775,0.000036626672,0.00005420379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000616314,0.00006416094,0.00003163015,0.00010738309,0.0010921896,0.00021469385,0.000016646496,0.00037051836,0.00002950346],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039514125,0.00002660851,0.004932468,1.7723323e-7,0.00006272364,0.0000029008654,0.00039245875,0.000013292419,0.000017664355,0.9929819,0.00020604915,0.0013242376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004749777,0.000104674895,0.0028374703,0.000014778095,0.000028382761,0.00018102603,0.015194373,0.000012520073,0.0000074792715,0.91038924,0.07062038,0.00013470177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062625273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024798617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7992389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083764765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020024804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146649806","doi":"10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.093008.131445","title":"After the Rights Revolution: Bills of Rights in the Postconflict State","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Law and Social Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Constitutionalism; Law; Politics; Political science; Fundamental rights; Bill of rights; Right to property; Democracy; State (computer science); International human rights law; Reservation of rights; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.013930297102848262,"score_gpt":0.3189139990728605,"score_spread":0.30498370197001223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146649806","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3359666,0.023041211,0.0000032908115,0.022005577,0.00051791355,0.00087372627,0.00008615603,0.000012067152,0.61749345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952629,0.0027714456,0.0000115600005,0.0018020836,0.00009681198,0.000012770748,2.8801242e-7,6.071222e-7,0.00004153127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987041,0.00014797138,0.00023060868,0.00013162999,0.0005868407,0.00019888215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934703,0.00015449466,0.00010949606,0.00008970742,0.00026956928,0.000029691717],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026239385,0.000062857885,0.00017739079,0.000017604421,0.0014069921,0.000021162907,0.00040162998,0.000028236842,0.000028960552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000119041266,0.000029639175,0.000059760026,0.00046801407,0.007356457,0.00024159493,0.000059571976,0.000121554265,0.000003307793],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000369807,0.000017775326,0.00018660988,0.000026596252,0.0000025262966,8.700706e-7,0.013667007,5.9362946e-9,0.000019110377,0.9852728,0.00012957107,0.00067340885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060935396,0.000027063443,0.019958895,0.00029409077,0.000020390478,0.000001383058,0.0009458413,1.2347198e-7,0.000024953255,0.13970844,0.83887404,0.00008386318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03231372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024523301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84556437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011055613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001565758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146971893","doi":"","title":"Book Review – Good Government? Good Citizens?: Courts, Politics and Markets in a Changing Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Legitimacy; Political science; Charter; Legislature; Law; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Convergence (economics); Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.005730131055725373,"score_gpt":0.2428021907726298,"score_spread":0.23707205971690443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146971893","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020448148,0.8532964,0.00020902787,0.02165789,0.0003559906,0.00028187415,0.0000128879265,0.000014699488,0.10372307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6724604,0.31619614,0.0000062960617,0.00647413,0.00035784589,0.0000026732828,6.8120045e-7,0.0000059283934,0.004495921],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969034,0.000081828104,0.00023995127,0.00012325619,0.0006333827,0.0020181811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995729,0.000104864535,0.00010255222,0.000043855605,0.000050563176,0.00012529582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029569983,0.00010279084,0.0001834645,0.00004613136,0.0007330124,0.000024485185,0.00012564151,0.000038322712,0.0000605698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001680159,0.00009711652,0.000038655216,0.00023629474,0.00013647284,0.00010009593,0.000038925442,0.0005868052,0.0000016016626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012250361,0.000023054392,0.0066851373,0.000020828158,0.00007393743,0.000044417164,0.00029723067,2.0176532e-7,0.000002855942,0.9777615,0.0064967135,0.008581863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039718393,0.000045578374,0.0049234144,0.00049989915,0.0000507103,0.00013635153,0.010481851,0.0000011915188,0.0000049411224,0.06103245,0.9221909,0.00023553536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17827559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.874145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91672903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032304863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004536334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8447609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147029523","doi":"10.1017/s000842390177792x","title":"Reconciling Rights and Federalism during Review of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms: The Supreme Court of Canada and the Centralization Thesis, 1982 to 1999","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Political science; Charter; Law; Jurisdiction; Dual federalism; Original jurisdiction; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.013951069000208228,"score_gpt":0.24190595500660292,"score_spread":0.22795488600639469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147029523","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9656795,0.0044598184,0.0000057485527,0.027036887,0.00015779454,0.00015420708,0.000016188287,5.22187e-7,0.002489322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987784,0.00042544512,0.000009466083,0.000681564,0.00007677507,6.3383555e-7,3.834935e-8,8.27183e-7,0.000026873671],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988453,0.00011019312,0.00026681545,0.00007535539,0.0003926973,0.00030967704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897593,0.00017772628,0.00012700472,0.0000647983,0.00028635305,0.00036816986],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011575645,0.00005291087,0.00017231792,0.000030884334,0.0010895757,0.000029235634,0.0002477973,0.000016332964,0.000017835891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006726949,0.00002441318,0.000028413762,0.00024833984,0.0039951825,0.000100522564,0.000024435714,0.000066804685,4.2242103e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069921175,0.000003152969,0.010276461,0.00003791249,0.000013598174,0.0000035640442,0.002870083,0.0000021230244,0.000053696138,0.98631597,0.00031326895,0.000103154045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074527186,0.00006827973,0.7965498,0.0041405833,0.00015624205,0.00015135684,0.004275831,0.000037260805,0.0011585655,0.17043737,0.022027634,0.00025183518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9571279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97410613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8158786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012666523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016851326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147732625","doi":"10.1177/0192512111432565","title":"Dialogue or compliance? Measuring legislatures’ policy responses to court rulings on rights","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Political Science Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Constitutionalism; Law; Parliamentary sovereignty; Supreme court; Judicial review; Political science; Legislation; Commonwealth; Parliamentary procedure; Law and economics; Sovereignty; Sociology; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.16455224401005697,"score_gpt":0.4442608147905704,"score_spread":0.2797085707805134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147732625","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007906639,0.0040748543,0.00022074883,0.24782486,0.0023463683,0.0006586423,0.000061748586,0.00013380536,0.73677236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97995776,0.0013032279,0.0002672176,0.01533279,0.002359801,0.000036678317,0.0000014472729,0.0000037417728,0.0007373206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968368,0.00011343334,0.0002736364,0.00027161,0.0014690699,0.0010354926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982177,0.00040009397,0.0000576794,0.00013037151,0.00038370345,0.0008104309],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002028739,0.00013139957,0.00022336813,0.00016046227,0.0010628359,0.00010356485,0.0007453822,0.000038979208,0.00022377475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007821681,0.00009109888,0.00008847073,0.0007752995,0.0014905574,0.00043032132,0.0001513271,0.00014027471,0.00078943965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019357176,0.00005572924,0.00066597183,0.000012117979,0.000007902161,0.000003085728,0.00019143347,2.758006e-7,0.000017976236,0.9955133,0.0013881063,0.0021247196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008019026,0.00003750968,0.016457347,0.0016681855,0.000014199758,0.000010899457,0.000074920674,0.000001651919,0.00006866009,0.06075328,0.9206148,0.00021838522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007714564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004423004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97205114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008800704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007753478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148162120","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2012.00222.x","title":"Parliamentary and judicial ambivalence toward executive prerogative powers in <scp>C</scp>anada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Ambivalence; Political science; Law; Legislature; Parliament; Power (physics); Executive power; Statutory law; Humanities; Politics; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.03555248779724102,"score_gpt":0.2822290438318493,"score_spread":0.2466765560346083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148162120","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8191474,0.0009426512,0.00004112418,0.030287875,0.00063837,0.00048286046,0.00009324982,0.000034611712,0.14833187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983367,0.00015039381,0.000037717793,0.00094131206,0.0003207239,0.000036357105,0.000020110288,0.0000041601925,0.00015255621],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874264,0.00011693803,0.0001581715,0.00018508304,0.00025625515,0.0005408924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990517,0.0001787866,0.000060613886,0.00005181639,0.000067321555,0.0005897688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032871525,0.00010372802,0.00011761565,0.00012429716,0.0006210709,0.00008850918,0.000106906155,0.00008917261,0.00004825111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009373306,0.000116905074,0.000022786096,0.0003230684,0.0006266094,0.0007096878,0.000017706805,0.000115091316,0.000013657217],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041245075,0.00005222321,0.10081067,0.0000044937287,0.000024426707,0.000019738214,0.017055651,1.03763476e-7,0.000012620678,0.87099683,0.0076695406,0.0033495664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039189958,0.000130408,0.13645941,0.000042250325,0.000024677453,0.00000748182,0.17224348,0.0000059733975,0.00014441367,0.018286757,0.67203885,0.00022439157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20771833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9162556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85271007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053620595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024143872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79755753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149371404","doi":"10.25071/1916-9272.34374","title":"The Precarious Future of Women's Equality: Access to Justice and the Court Challenges Program","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Public Policy Administration and Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.12277229383085636,"score_gpt":0.38885000188171753,"score_spread":0.2660777080508612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149371404","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16885066,0.009427257,0.00006948279,0.6644067,0.00046814771,0.0006357593,0.0000083276755,0.000020269848,0.15611337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99050045,0.00737216,0.000017563087,0.0012626755,0.00076687086,0.000011967819,8.731252e-8,0.0000018381152,0.00006641591],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987829,0.0004393844,0.00023631036,0.00004846833,0.00029705523,0.00019588358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989745,0.00034247385,0.00024285955,0.000072906434,0.00023442737,0.0001328549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036775013,0.000061454004,0.00013081913,0.000024737143,0.0011580744,0.00016674271,0.00031542807,0.00003581014,0.000007825068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041710152,0.000027016804,0.000030485526,0.00014759372,0.0016702868,0.00023145217,0.00006294116,0.0001131467,3.813768e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013140397,0.000037638674,0.000026303285,0.000005759621,0.00004807918,3.082968e-7,0.037371386,6.7192246e-8,8.8961053e-7,0.9283927,0.00014094818,0.033844486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053520885,0.0004714404,0.010792752,0.00001818965,0.00012369806,0.000027812452,0.07786406,0.0000020956516,0.000014371859,0.16862634,0.7414365,0.00008753761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024547894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011834101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8216498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033869517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052144576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89070886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150123293","doi":"10.7202/040776ar","title":"In the Case of Federalism v. Charter: The Processes and Outcomes of a Federalist Dialogue","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalist; Charter; Federalism; Supreme court; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.049980608692396504,"score_gpt":0.357797620371223,"score_spread":0.30781701167882647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150123293","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9057686,0.0047066314,0.000008589241,0.07965656,0.00067677256,0.00010673775,0.00003233351,0.0000012104626,0.009042612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997024,0.0014967746,0.000017693405,0.0011711298,0.000254981,0.0000018433419,2.0233914e-7,0.0000014774745,0.000031893243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911314,0.00006206949,0.00033594028,0.00004675681,0.0003173938,0.00012467921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982279,0.0006384922,0.00022350722,0.000030228595,0.0008357983,0.000044067416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011466566,0.00005838329,0.00017881906,0.00024226417,0.00033184479,0.000031056778,0.00023778847,0.000018948067,0.0000047647763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009512274,0.000031965526,0.00004936615,0.00023165578,0.0007640596,0.00013126514,0.00002284879,0.00008250114,2.5508422e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093830466,0.00010938584,0.14853434,0.000030226096,0.0015226123,0.003143469,0.21546084,0.0000071269055,0.000019457906,0.6129128,0.008597953,0.009567996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011901828,0.00016012118,0.36525154,0.00027189695,0.00013468803,0.0012631876,0.42742488,7.3639046e-7,0.00011003677,0.07950125,0.12444087,0.00025062254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42453265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9582204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5336878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000075050535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035659192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57929945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150386089","doi":"10.1177/0192512114523461","title":"Building competition and breaking cartels? The legislative and judicial regulation of political parties in common law democracies","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Political Science Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law; Legislature; Political science; CONTEST; Competition (biology); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03299157741217985,"score_gpt":0.36497338028245957,"score_spread":0.33198180287027973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150386089","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28349608,0.005798245,0.000905144,0.14915483,0.00053270126,0.00060499413,0.000020562655,0.00004469987,0.55944276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99771726,0.00061827386,0.000102290476,0.0013653717,0.00017919505,0.000008518617,7.175166e-7,0.0000014877842,0.000006861165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985478,0.00015799562,0.00026275546,0.00015951878,0.00052624696,0.00034566852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909556,0.000505522,0.00006676787,0.000051149822,0.00017014501,0.00011084644],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015522434,0.00006659772,0.00018260886,0.000046433324,0.00050325587,0.00006109072,0.00017212155,0.000024770694,0.000013965206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008365902,0.000048443417,0.000027803,0.0002077955,0.005514121,0.00031495106,0.00010766335,0.000082325154,0.0000015903396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018506014,0.000009821994,0.0038400749,0.00001900791,0.000003032036,1.9714422e-7,0.00024254645,6.489654e-7,0.000052389405,0.99282026,0.000003794455,0.0030063463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007388323,0.000018789056,0.097758465,0.0008904753,0.000016490681,0.000005603386,0.00036856608,0.00018773049,0.00006528415,0.8901362,0.010400126,0.00007841292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015082715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003084557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7142212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012772063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008405699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151138624","doi":"10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110413-030532","title":"Law and Courts in Authoritarian Regimes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Law and Social Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":234,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Political science; Law; Human rights; Transitional justice; Corporate governance; Politics; Subject (documents); Rule of law; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Democracy; Economics","score_opus":0.020798648409496256,"score_gpt":0.3339173211579476,"score_spread":0.31311867274845134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151138624","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003989146,0.01693965,0.00000807132,0.008510096,0.0001282184,0.00015541862,0.0000073416936,0.000011711476,0.97025037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850951,0.011379696,0.000042052914,0.003318844,0.000103792205,0.000004225449,3.521101e-7,0.0000011997325,0.00005477622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989835,0.00010292735,0.00016261823,0.0001731606,0.00036647893,0.00021128937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996048,0.00008639402,0.00006205636,0.000040377974,0.0001389926,0.00006733269],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021072493,0.000060170234,0.0002178526,0.00001769887,0.0013807911,0.000030249663,0.00014417258,0.00003462853,0.000007927297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024039418,0.00005039082,0.000026260319,0.00021064174,0.0052749063,0.00030050272,0.00007609712,0.000058167632,0.000001925397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010243511,0.000008958489,0.00013909274,0.00006398159,0.0000014044477,4.4526178e-7,0.0036186778,5.4096283e-9,0.000004309706,0.9911817,0.00008449748,0.004895928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009639008,0.00003759557,0.0033992224,0.0006718291,0.00001628492,6.7873947e-7,0.0023541632,7.3330943e-7,0.0000066499883,0.18132184,0.811967,0.00012757185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01463209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039078826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9811059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020151318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000121722864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151831444","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1007","title":"Competing Constitutional Rights in an Age of Deference: A Bad Time to Be Accused","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07104288149708309,"score_gpt":0.34101486717061036,"score_spread":0.26997198567352726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151831444","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05636303,0.019710245,0.00010398105,0.011311967,0.00021561416,0.0013636209,0.00005950214,0.00009652994,0.9107755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933399,0.0032691834,0.0002902974,0.0027376376,0.00013640744,0.000037692498,0.000028013277,0.0000027821657,0.00015806923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850225,0.00021552345,0.0003586114,0.00021165938,0.00044465475,0.00026728556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993494,0.0001211276,0.000076115946,0.00012274469,0.00020573585,0.00012484896],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008144648,0.000113630216,0.0003908353,0.00003660881,0.00045265554,0.000021938433,0.0002690569,0.000048076254,0.0015962943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000196543,0.00009843933,0.000077919314,0.00042559806,0.0012988977,0.0001747932,0.00005857987,0.000091525224,0.0002403665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000845025,0.000072465424,0.001710697,0.000043268814,0.000011650602,0.000020719493,0.000400808,0.0000033921835,0.000072738476,0.9965924,0.0005252219,0.00053816073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014742345,0.000028382698,0.0010373768,0.0015780721,0.00002819207,0.0000023097493,0.00006801497,0.0000018977375,0.0000060140574,0.008255168,0.9886906,0.00015655893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062750657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025826413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9883373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007907614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024199294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152602028","doi":"10.1017/s0008423902778153","title":"Ghosts and Straw Men: A Comment on Miriam Smith's ''Ghosts of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council''","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Mistake; Political science; Supreme court; Democracy","score_opus":0.05225425524564669,"score_gpt":0.27105401118617556,"score_spread":0.21879975594052886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152602028","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7068917,0.00057958753,0.000004731466,0.15274599,0.00092259946,0.00022536104,0.000052218544,0.0000023871787,0.13857542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971523,0.000022028993,0.000012790255,0.0025905624,0.00016332782,6.729034e-7,1.2688258e-8,0.0000017625414,0.000056501023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978029,0.00012030072,0.00029181765,0.00009908402,0.0011544698,0.00053143786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983857,0.00019446264,0.00016985783,0.00012121008,0.00053245574,0.00059626694],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013003007,0.000076371805,0.00017574332,0.000052172727,0.0012022711,0.000042510528,0.0007002458,0.000039900577,0.00007247799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017832421,0.000044251778,0.00008215989,0.00046640635,0.0085766055,0.000104481005,0.000056714962,0.00019037428,0.0000020017203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031927636,0.000025245154,0.016743917,0.0000025539894,0.000009221818,0.0000033369906,0.0020844333,0.0000017141106,0.000050482657,0.9747261,0.005915363,0.00043446713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046972634,0.00024398434,0.86145073,0.0003628669,0.000056715257,0.000023871515,0.005418825,0.000022447284,0.00085123564,0.053150386,0.07776835,0.00018087536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13318852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10590598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92157567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000720854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004276995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9941215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152664636","doi":"10.1093/icon/mol009","title":"Property rights and regulatory innovation: Comparing constitutional cultures","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Property rights; Political science; Intellectual property; Business; Law; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02586636513874751,"score_gpt":0.3019422523031773,"score_spread":0.27607588716442977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152664636","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052463062,0.0014970643,0.0056227595,0.008219735,0.0033964915,0.0001975371,0.000045435063,0.00005561166,0.9285023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995601,0.000038215185,0.00087607413,0.00055869797,0.0023973966,0.000004476115,0.000020135998,0.000002280423,0.0005016963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976468,0.00008011712,0.0006640147,0.00016597143,0.0012454658,0.00019762054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99705386,0.00012416202,0.00038083977,0.00005429706,0.0023063484,0.00008049997],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062638806,0.00014612352,0.00024038671,0.00020885517,0.001030652,0.0001678286,0.00032446167,0.000091499576,0.00014215369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015713272,0.0001058437,0.00009594452,0.0002255934,0.011357649,0.00072627096,0.00007046113,0.00021170419,0.00001735058],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007401214,0.00009767935,0.007975257,0.0000018801711,0.00013344518,0.000063463885,0.00009809998,0.00022057361,0.00016762076,0.98627096,0.0047149756,0.00018202521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006569469,0.000017042,0.0043925648,0.00009846428,0.000026576929,0.00026212042,0.000086764725,0.000007719673,0.00013599305,0.3414782,0.6526851,0.00015249717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025490113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010637745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94313794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002532651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094421575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9913329},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152896665","doi":"10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00068.x","title":"Accountability and Coercion: Is Justice Blind when It Runs for Office?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":342,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Impartiality; Coercion (linguistics); Accountability; Economic Justice; Power (physics); Social psychology; Sentence; Criminal justice; Value (mathematics); Political science; Psychology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.04572646034996888,"score_gpt":0.37910961808388594,"score_spread":0.3333831577339171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152896665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8867028,0.00013586569,0.0041035004,0.0917513,0.00048676677,0.00018242918,0.000021879801,0.000012387998,0.016603075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929469,0.000041343606,0.002580217,0.0039095865,0.0004990666,0.0000020118378,7.2851606e-8,0.0000020575226,0.000018729692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823517,0.000036594844,0.0002659523,0.00017444874,0.0006881228,0.00059974496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982453,0.00037774164,0.00014564057,0.000067363624,0.00063404365,0.0005299087],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015774255,0.00007769584,0.00021675813,0.00006723173,0.0010814546,0.000099028795,0.00033947083,0.00002224828,0.000039436865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015742572,0.00006121714,0.00006746922,0.00041650314,0.010796876,0.00040643458,0.00005792121,0.00011666236,0.000006834542],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065052474,0.00006664017,0.0011968598,0.0000036398717,0.000009296406,0.000002084821,0.0049997107,0.0000027128203,0.00007257075,0.9897304,0.0001884272,0.0036625864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018271811,0.0015919094,0.08178722,0.0001474963,0.0003316346,0.00009232924,0.15005055,0.000016172635,0.00040635548,0.6967338,0.06647256,0.0005428175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010884089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007969085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29299664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032282158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016418007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153859558","doi":"","title":"Unappealing: An Assessment of the Limits on Appeal Rights in Canada's New Refugee Determination System","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Refugee; Citizenship; Immigration; Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; History; Politics","score_opus":0.03712882396122151,"score_gpt":0.31755706181669535,"score_spread":0.2804282378554738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153859558","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7746526,0.000112672155,0.000027494023,0.0018128401,0.0010493104,0.00033225052,0.00001170891,0.000030990912,0.22197014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991851,0.0000027852184,0.000086081076,0.00019780858,0.00030093917,0.000009531144,0.0000021522353,0.0000029103078,0.00021268835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844646,0.00024289577,0.00022557112,0.00016835639,0.0007050951,0.00021162284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937755,0.0000541891,0.000115114155,0.00014864943,0.00011254577,0.00019195002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000502374,0.000087154476,0.00015743595,0.000024756782,0.00041141393,0.000029278246,0.00027483518,0.000051164665,0.0000073395527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007934294,0.00006339604,0.000031977776,0.00022727813,0.00014100141,0.00012892332,0.000034010623,0.00013520413,0.000006841802],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000097883485,0.000027130167,0.016266985,0.0000049513424,0.0000070579536,0.0000056982976,0.0003553358,0.00016304756,0.000009501386,0.98199755,0.00039659123,0.0007563614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024903268,0.00034631926,0.3870322,0.0011066176,0.00008482555,0.0000052894366,0.013442725,0.0007713863,0.0008222045,0.07420181,0.51882374,0.0008725362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98352224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9077957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014394912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032494287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57643473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154988461","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0003","title":"The Institutional Theory of Legal Interpretation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Interpretation (philosophy); Scope (computer science); Status quo; Law and economics; Dominance (genetics); Political science; Law; Legal realism; Legal research; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014877897780977298,"score_gpt":0.2264908908722523,"score_spread":0.21161299309127501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154988461","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06600149,0.0022029495,0.0032092114,0.0007479395,0.0004041377,0.00004865983,0.0000054366533,0.0000077796885,0.9273724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978278,0.0014842921,0.00013027326,0.000018652678,0.000081355916,1.6669322e-8,2.4093532e-7,5.3013514e-7,0.00045679093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994792,0.000099185665,0.000075537886,0.00003477218,0.00023596751,0.00007535156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995579,0.000091549584,0.000094640054,0.000028156031,0.00019273013,0.00003501044],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003315307,0.000028148273,0.00006310533,0.0000058016217,0.0030711598,0.0000062240433,0.00016815757,0.000021292877,0.00017919665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054127446,0.000023061335,0.00006953735,0.000019746765,0.0021337257,0.00033543992,0.00002710419,0.000052744526,0.0000021773142],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009496171,0.000017422579,0.00034276184,4.9279737e-7,0.000038231487,0.000009440222,0.005470745,0.000017310776,0.000013271657,0.9905833,0.00026137778,0.0031506864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005767637,0.00010024259,0.026262157,0.000057156292,0.000052955045,0.00006133609,0.063341945,0.00001730931,0.000039668168,0.052029956,0.8573407,0.00011981516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07936588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16922633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93855333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014521222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002378709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157873251","doi":"10.1177/0020715212439311","title":"Legal opportunity structure and social movement strategy in Northern Ireland and southern United States","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Comparative Sociology","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social movement; Mobilization; Irish; Political science; State (computer science); Openness to experience; Movement (music); Law; Sociology; Social psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.06464432359784192,"score_gpt":0.3618229870292625,"score_spread":0.29717866343142063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157873251","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937845,0.0007433513,0.00004040949,0.0032631368,0.00026186396,0.000049069615,0.000039758284,0.0000033941735,0.0018145065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987547,0.00016174317,0.000016827718,0.0004901008,0.0005274168,0.000001050973,0.000012549863,0.0000020114294,0.000033610857],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990514,0.00025546638,0.00024076046,0.000062377985,0.00023026182,0.00015972895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920875,0.00015518334,0.0002087763,0.000013174211,0.00033815592,0.00007594278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037281643,0.000079811754,0.00019727508,0.000103970924,0.00021585113,0.000026941781,0.00010930607,0.000067265515,0.00006004767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037563765,0.000065186054,0.000030581396,0.000044777855,0.0010147971,0.00018701078,0.000042476215,0.00021183929,0.0000014551973],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000121997684,0.000090649846,0.5525629,0.000001538482,0.00028565316,0.00001426924,0.102933794,0.00011133306,0.00006921239,0.34276155,0.00018792295,0.0008591924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017857318,0.00019260979,0.55491376,0.000027351312,0.000046603545,0.000030468314,0.17680238,0.00005464061,0.000025610096,0.2209667,0.044873063,0.00028107825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019560258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062372894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12179485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000097632335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014781964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37390622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159819816","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00299.x","title":"Does <i>the</i> Lawyer Matter? Influencing Outcomes on the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Test (biology); Political science","score_opus":0.021612247876357456,"score_gpt":0.2842204796590145,"score_spread":0.262608231782657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159819816","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03571822,0.11633324,0.000008959295,0.4323972,0.0012607179,0.0013949411,0.00004247007,0.00005606339,0.4127882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7552775,0.078652166,0.000040637693,0.16479549,0.00025507252,0.000025192374,0.0000010612462,0.000007126004,0.0009457594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879146,0.00007992024,0.0002491379,0.00010626993,0.000516994,0.0002562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908227,0.0005133798,0.00011030186,0.00014816406,0.00010391625,0.00004195624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001435961,0.000091708076,0.00022833928,3.4873167e-7,0.0011162438,0.000014845175,0.00027853448,0.000028285283,0.00018328572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008810321,0.000036736346,0.00019622657,0.00016595636,0.0006773934,0.00004269091,0.00004685564,0.00011736537,0.00001672074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014632693,0.000017573855,0.024984745,0.00015870777,0.00010407938,0.0000010201251,0.0012951923,8.253412e-7,0.000009928426,0.8172389,0.15540336,0.0007841767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033682754,0.000003457797,0.009093205,0.00050613034,0.000045004108,2.1242798e-7,0.0017893555,9.3892154e-8,0.000023073624,0.003894339,0.98452824,0.00008317218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42859834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7422621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8291249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011774874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027313703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85853577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162736966","doi":"","title":"\"Regulating Impartiality: Electoral Boundary Politics in the Administrative Arena\"","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ANU Open Research (Australian National University)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Political science; CLARITY; Counterintuitive; Discretion; Ambiguity; Politics; Corporate governance; Delegate; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.4127872420931872,"score_gpt":0.4676606458836321,"score_spread":0.05487340379044492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162736966","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45023757,0.000020297644,0.0000057991165,0.026479585,0.000057412708,0.00057250523,0.00005984242,0.000015839172,0.5225511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98429406,0.000034851815,0.000061724866,0.00015067,0.00021852505,0.0000040559153,0.00001795654,0.0000024418273,0.0152157],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970738,0.00084392674,0.00013213138,0.00021776752,0.0012488625,0.0004834689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986585,0.0004885696,0.00004182292,0.00008023876,0.0006189778,0.00011191637],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017903025,0.00007761203,0.0001141518,0.00018040104,0.0034757992,0.00018640261,0.0008709242,0.00006593207,0.00014595245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050977204,0.00007099491,0.000046766854,0.0015311507,0.0020683159,0.0005998837,0.00018092495,0.0003482803,0.000036297115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003759716,0.00009712143,0.020075722,0.0000014946245,0.000021257658,0.00013232311,0.0041474197,0.000006597717,0.000012166546,0.9603336,0.015061942,0.000072774055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006005893,0.00011548089,0.112374336,0.000032596065,0.0000065831214,0.000010380379,0.032060236,0.0000060230514,0.000093857576,0.10143159,0.7530564,0.00021189157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04390975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021756385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.858902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005293379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002955011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99782157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162943359","doi":"10.1093/icon/mou032","title":"Eulogy for the constitution that was","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Politics; Law; Political science; Repeal; Statute","score_opus":0.041009427941542706,"score_gpt":0.33456745657305276,"score_spread":0.29355802863151004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162943359","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015522109,0.0015526562,0.37148413,0.06352865,0.014645831,0.0004022389,0.00008681748,0.00004324447,0.54670423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933732,0.00023643066,0.0007302393,0.0024687976,0.003036627,0.000013276327,0.000005868093,0.000002412398,0.00013313492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983231,0.00010471486,0.0003659448,0.00011312305,0.00089328317,0.00019987795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99675405,0.0013190961,0.00031436794,0.00006758574,0.0014569997,0.00008790315],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013409223,0.00010422158,0.00017850727,0.000080274534,0.0011546288,0.0001150789,0.0005965671,0.00007226494,0.00014089629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009936084,0.00007360811,0.00022889076,0.00007676666,0.006294786,0.00036368056,0.000046312154,0.00015278356,0.000026869828],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010391987,0.000042180694,0.00092996785,0.0000010791966,0.00020719928,0.0000052336763,0.00015470499,0.00029978144,0.000037146856,0.9928025,0.0026163326,0.0027999498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055169343,0.00003214596,0.0004993923,0.000035927125,0.000048530776,0.00007169161,0.00023059812,0.00003383502,0.000081286176,0.15824509,0.8400875,0.00008234697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006383091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007013243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.991821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017170253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080674846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99640954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163572492","doi":"10.1590/s1808-24322012000100003","title":"Judicialização da política e controle judicial de políticas públicas","year":2012,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Direito GV","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.05734263990832818,"score_gpt":0.36152019259678186,"score_spread":0.3041775526884537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163572492","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04259047,0.12552446,0.002588664,0.058121704,0.007849477,0.0024495327,0.0005734203,0.00071884313,0.7595834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837033,0.0017047558,0.000052461037,0.0027028725,0.009138054,0.00006063628,0.000019307905,0.000048938382,0.0025696477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942866,0.0007456212,0.0008904819,0.00061204704,0.0012202782,0.0022449922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99727213,0.0005193456,0.00039017387,0.00045411894,0.00030208493,0.0010621673],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019074433,0.0005752425,0.0010732552,0.00016320571,0.0024344858,0.00044840513,0.0006884755,0.0004189585,0.0013064208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015194046,0.0005731754,0.000529017,0.0010581991,0.001768317,0.00051194115,0.0003325771,0.00049628277,0.001928567],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009264489,0.0004527856,0.020296006,0.000045757075,0.00029794863,0.00002607306,0.0039232424,8.898813e-7,0.00017569294,0.93352544,0.03545127,0.005712248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006964464,0.0001027642,0.01008775,0.00028468904,0.00069607096,0.000017947943,0.0032732103,0.00003132294,0.00004296106,0.0076865247,0.97623223,0.00084807386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075492454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043554357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9411129,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006466239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009421392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163632303","doi":"10.1017/s0008423914001097","title":"Constitutional Design and Australian Exceptionalism in the Adoption of National Bills of Rights","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Sydney; Australian Government","keywords":"Constitution; Bill of rights; Political science; Exceptionalism; Statutory law; Legislature; Law; Parliamentary sovereignty; Legislation; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Public administration; Human rights; Politics; Sociology; Parliament","score_opus":0.0538156866212117,"score_gpt":0.31531485368088036,"score_spread":0.26149916705966864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163632303","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9220281,0.00014450288,0.0044383686,0.020464277,0.0005362405,0.00022830057,0.000044186156,0.000002617947,0.052113365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999137,0.0000030842111,0.0005049239,0.00019660567,0.00014951693,7.528074e-7,2.6511836e-7,3.8750076e-7,0.000007492999],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985952,0.00014406753,0.0002465603,0.00006866269,0.00066074857,0.0002847988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986638,0.00034923144,0.00009547868,0.000028759556,0.00054410956,0.00031862888],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030034098,0.00004192359,0.00010356394,0.00014920226,0.00041877048,0.000025874313,0.0002463896,0.000032346998,0.000045795732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012728407,0.000028692722,0.00003057535,0.00037920396,0.010602105,0.00020197185,0.000006715369,0.00008272376,0.0000016751161],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002094107,0.000009248072,0.0044966773,0.0000010882549,0.000002118957,0.0000016372207,0.00055245054,0.00004960032,0.000063911735,0.99462306,0.000107346335,0.00009078321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015780536,0.00006107158,0.3841493,0.000058117916,0.0000070667597,0.000027002738,0.0010135055,0.000019742261,0.000082324805,0.60912615,0.005238435,0.000059452454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059704322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026374009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38549688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018635923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031514945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99209046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165498009","doi":"10.7202/1000630ar","title":"Complexifying Roncarelli’s Rule of Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Rule of law; Relevance (law); Political science; Due process; Notice; Exemplification; Common law; Sources of law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.14430199994377327,"score_gpt":0.3167429412609803,"score_spread":0.17244094131720702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165498009","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005490228,0.00033161815,0.00004743406,0.00021123169,0.00038072496,0.00003813621,0.000012204196,0.000017280201,0.99347115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99874526,0.00011772478,0.00066516263,0.00020624304,0.00021133212,0.0000010717994,2.9500495e-7,0.000003269666,0.000049611277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991657,0.00007214831,0.0001918322,0.00006983703,0.00029603575,0.00020442127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995658,0.00003329469,0.000103721344,0.00004441738,0.00015997772,0.00009282901],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035421582,0.000058294194,0.00013262579,0.000017853094,0.0046816827,0.000014144096,0.00016932526,0.00003699303,0.00048760214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025313097,0.000049944647,0.00008435639,0.00006874408,0.00083731156,0.00015577376,0.000037985534,0.00012355154,0.000039731654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009419977,0.000032265223,0.0004843671,0.000001342549,0.00002602263,0.000008996264,0.0011542516,0.0000010820137,0.000018284987,0.9970076,0.000045019136,0.0012113244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018103186,0.000039511895,0.0013722696,0.00003687375,0.000022333898,0.000014321968,0.0020960886,7.0457776e-7,0.00053454493,0.2164103,0.7791871,0.000104950435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.064127155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053380117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99342155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050764567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015400845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165567558","doi":"10.7202/040775ar","title":"The Impact of the Charter: Untangling the Effects of Institutional Change","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Politics; Political science; Parliament; Federalism; Law; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology","score_opus":0.04526354565047421,"score_gpt":0.3596920869553529,"score_spread":0.3144285413048787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165567558","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.925123,0.024885206,0.000027204207,0.025530139,0.0067205005,0.00031197778,0.000038894035,0.000003923715,0.017359205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99530905,0.003330002,0.000006348614,0.00021424117,0.0010927443,0.0000028966397,1.5887392e-7,0.000002067077,0.000042498203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986894,0.00007209711,0.00032381836,0.00004683638,0.00068148435,0.00018632274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99753,0.00079660764,0.0003480659,0.00005842357,0.0011984316,0.00006848205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001079814,0.00007117733,0.00014393836,0.00016807525,0.00090740103,0.000021030748,0.0005796946,0.000026827953,0.000006056022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013797197,0.000031920255,0.0002248405,0.0003273758,0.0014637684,0.0001167972,0.000054781718,0.00012918362,9.065823e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017146299,0.00008347124,0.13537778,0.00001552497,0.0049403724,0.000101820726,0.053804465,0.00008286784,0.00028780647,0.7332626,0.008087922,0.06378392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000634288,0.00016476668,0.84311646,0.00056979083,0.000119317054,0.00004971904,0.01933307,0.0000037877153,0.00052996026,0.021214027,0.11411247,0.00015233904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14927252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4480761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71204853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041162712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000836719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85639256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166019106","doi":"10.1017/s0008423905250102","title":"Establishing the Rules of the Game: Election Laws in Democracies","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Presidential election; Notice; Reputation; Law; Politics; Compendium; Election law; Democracy; History","score_opus":0.019436680793203178,"score_gpt":0.2857009979528216,"score_spread":0.26626431715961846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166019106","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91116685,0.0002830091,0.00002839947,0.04755956,0.00040978513,0.00005294779,0.0000035316123,0.0000015914042,0.040494356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99890184,0.000009511049,0.000042935128,0.00062905235,0.00035883393,4.889154e-7,1.4538002e-8,9.1296636e-7,0.00005642356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873894,0.00008374133,0.00019391775,0.0000591796,0.00042493513,0.0004992582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911964,0.00019653508,0.0000754883,0.000053606305,0.00023269822,0.0003220181],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015865661,0.000038569782,0.000079727644,0.000093686635,0.00094759295,0.000095699215,0.0005588039,0.00002402893,0.000034633777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034852673,0.000021563383,0.00004636996,0.0006068966,0.004275478,0.00038538355,0.000020503467,0.00016826244,0.0000029359455],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.2458533e-7,0.000003849413,0.014279974,3.8704783e-7,0.0000012638222,0.0000012956469,0.0014795265,0.00002251411,0.000049663882,0.98217076,0.00012833864,0.0018616803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007374316,0.000018928124,0.81321764,0.000058915546,0.000009201355,0.000016848999,0.005871753,0.000024598254,0.00042016874,0.15147673,0.028744707,0.00006679452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27340275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6671572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8306941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051740237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043846583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W21665667","doi":"10.3732/ajb.89.4.664","title":"Abuse of Rights: An Old Principle, a New Age","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Criminology; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.05830837734920551,"score_gpt":0.3040873362336409,"score_spread":0.2457789588844354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W21665667","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030074803,0.00038848008,0.000023259154,0.00070731714,0.00036185625,0.00006513112,0.000009514417,0.000026819103,0.96834284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975228,0.00034120205,0.00034170452,0.00025518783,0.0006089493,8.463004e-7,2.824548e-7,0.0000029928667,0.0009260414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990306,0.000073816685,0.00020582137,0.00009013432,0.00038371532,0.0002158975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995007,0.00002972972,0.00010240631,0.00006731011,0.000094495925,0.00020538],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024819045,0.0000676788,0.00013695219,0.000029600418,0.003730649,0.000034664678,0.00019895642,0.00004573832,0.00072214776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033339267,0.000053087748,0.00007580893,0.00013796784,0.0004001469,0.00035000467,0.000017081235,0.00013435271,0.000048372884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050794215,0.00008453405,0.0001269831,6.0167616e-7,0.000023044757,0.0000320363,0.0014881102,0.0000056405156,0.000015362473,0.9964476,0.0006416489,0.0011293313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021310533,0.000041836018,0.00047686932,0.000021885713,0.000014593242,0.000014031085,0.00026336426,0.000002406572,0.00004580147,0.057952665,0.94087535,0.00007810769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03451132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11581486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.967448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059069178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000095942705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99756634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167854740","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1159","title":"Parliament’s Response to Charkaoui: Bill C-3 and the Special Advocate Regime under IRPA","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Law; Charter; Political science; Legislature; Supreme court; Constitution; Constitutional court; Constitutional right; Politics","score_opus":0.05935781489032223,"score_gpt":0.30931081651504316,"score_spread":0.24995300162472095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167854740","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010828497,0.18354496,0.000045556288,0.5144919,0.0011368233,0.0025059795,0.000022965041,0.000118375414,0.28730494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5692713,0.38400057,0.00008395483,0.038282778,0.002708004,0.00018522517,0.0000029421844,0.000015914069,0.005449286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981376,0.0005578321,0.00026014497,0.00025021815,0.00048537808,0.0003088307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991451,0.00030285754,0.0000749729,0.00019427294,0.00014262795,0.00014014881],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018200936,0.00013916158,0.00036443805,0.000019695879,0.0015960014,0.000034326356,0.0002547771,0.000040634553,0.00031044625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000469856,0.00007973728,0.00011296823,0.00030462374,0.0018444128,0.00011184985,0.000115728035,0.00010551038,0.00034549623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027857546,0.00003224475,0.00016340573,0.000039462764,0.000052505406,0.0000157391,0.0019791347,7.2605235e-7,0.000006602185,0.88708496,0.10809906,0.002247609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030194965,0.000022604325,0.0013232382,0.00041468698,0.000050196693,0.0000078707835,0.0002229815,2.2207759e-7,0.0000019022546,0.010400225,0.9871156,0.00013849663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005178981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028013664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8790166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000082423765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002280866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168592881","doi":"10.1111/1468-2508.00126","title":"Selecting Appeals for Judicial Review in Canada: A Replication and Multivariate Test of American Hypotheses","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Generalizability theory; Appeal; Supreme court; Test (biology); Political science; Certiorari; Replication (statistics); Law; Psychology; Biology","score_opus":0.0659736452785146,"score_gpt":0.32696655501715616,"score_spread":0.26099290973864153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168592881","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89214176,0.03798772,0.0004022797,0.054721296,0.0002498071,0.00084060914,0.00006213722,0.000008560648,0.013585855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917522,0.007398774,0.00009201731,0.0005558531,0.00018120994,0.000001416222,5.6761053e-8,0.0000017661481,0.000016714954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993318,0.00008340041,0.00026243998,0.000035037967,0.00016135036,0.00012599347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985,0.0009205201,0.00032443373,0.00004159043,0.00017914454,0.00003431294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075747067,0.000035111454,0.0001689746,0.000020348898,0.00018672831,0.0000033553615,0.00008623027,0.000007570208,0.000003596568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033308254,0.000024450483,0.00002089454,0.0001451918,0.00017112297,0.000031153475,0.000010864412,0.000057564335,1.385753e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097033735,0.00051064993,0.31284574,0.0006487861,0.00038128108,0.000012462956,0.03760538,0.0001256941,0.0019146927,0.49422047,0.019172408,0.1324654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002444105,0.0012734652,0.60381895,0.0075908178,0.0012120529,0.00013771925,0.06471737,0.0010426446,0.0013032252,0.1718129,0.14369443,0.0009523155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80904883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59813267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32240757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014894437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039988014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40920037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169202192","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1118163","title":"Executive Control and Legislative Success","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Control (management); Psychology; Business; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Law","score_opus":0.009194659230791389,"score_gpt":0.27761369471129715,"score_spread":0.2684190354805058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169202192","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23108315,0.031816013,0.010653103,0.055107784,0.0005102425,0.00044084442,0.0000075464245,0.00009900205,0.6702823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916533,0.0064902497,0.000009144422,0.00040238828,0.0005271368,0.000001456881,2.0521544e-7,0.0000018977534,0.00091420556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832207,0.000105057,0.00011166022,0.00010406003,0.00024068395,0.0011164468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965864,0.00006312785,0.00006928073,0.000026566544,0.00011015201,0.00007220341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009702246,0.00007523504,0.00012657572,0.000039227943,0.0012055429,0.000057793866,0.000111301175,0.000041041243,0.000009262251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011299028,0.000062836174,0.00004543044,0.00012418765,0.0003327089,0.00023136582,0.000007773472,0.00055472174,0.0000073141055],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029807328,0.000017115062,0.0028579242,1.01637056e-7,0.000053503714,0.0000024925187,0.0017633591,0.0000011328951,0.000017437193,0.97855943,0.00007814773,0.016619565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004817545,0.00016445213,0.008635038,0.00000831024,0.000025934214,0.000026369396,0.008006738,0.0000026095518,0.0000027964252,0.9678971,0.014646673,0.00010222698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015436134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008048303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76057017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035780747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014614455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9272183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169293164","doi":"10.1017/s1537592707072623","title":"Borrowing Constitutional Designs: Constitutional Law in Weimar Germany and the French Fifth Republic","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Weimar Republic; Constitutionalism; Political science; Constitutional law; Context (archaeology); Constitutional economics; Law; Politics; Comparative law; Comparative politics; Democracy; The Republic; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.033160930601302534,"score_gpt":0.31498430176629355,"score_spread":0.281823371164991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169293164","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048787598,0.003862964,0.0030116695,0.011207674,0.00042318524,0.00043067354,0.00005248819,0.00007969549,0.93214405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973689,0.00024131569,0.00022071172,0.0014604405,0.0005309843,0.000014264371,0.000002574482,0.0000027343813,0.00015813022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839103,0.00015240567,0.00024503283,0.0002721074,0.0004690725,0.0004703379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985487,0.0009741885,0.000060744347,0.00009859376,0.000196933,0.000120852485],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013647807,0.00013401509,0.00019003202,0.00010775293,0.0017087057,0.00008461971,0.00015227593,0.00008113361,0.000066215674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00084491965,0.00010552236,0.00006944047,0.00025603964,0.025320461,0.00019948636,0.00005392315,0.00024755255,0.000019192905],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025000816,0.000071906805,0.0020641175,0.0000016384868,0.000029007297,0.000015416992,0.011245627,0.000007748333,0.0000031163856,0.98634195,0.00012889775,0.000065549495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020206498,0.000047209698,0.04251729,0.000082847495,0.000040482315,0.000026349924,0.05922068,0.000026068168,0.000019330964,0.7580578,0.13755132,0.00038999107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009462964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002945662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9485812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041263204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006036649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169720082","doi":"10.7440/colombiaint79.2013.02","title":"Asambleas constituyentes y democracia: una lectura crítica del nuevo constitucionalismo en la región andina","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Colombia Internacional","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015147336197191634,"score_gpt":0.2929968519468742,"score_spread":0.2778495157496826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169720082","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4168045,0.0013344127,0.0015279119,0.02755105,0.0019648038,0.00087781606,0.00008281624,0.00031322546,0.5495435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951506,0.00025203673,0.00038003467,0.0013107389,0.0006122546,0.00014230674,0.000020238856,0.000012065776,0.002119715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770105,0.00028372172,0.0003680141,0.00041645387,0.0006931229,0.00053760904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801695,0.000982766,0.00013851252,0.00014741944,0.00044974056,0.00026461072],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044503497,0.00025125794,0.00032634643,0.00011475188,0.001138538,0.00020741766,0.0004940001,0.00022038961,0.0031360558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001137614,0.00023741821,0.00017660577,0.00026516482,0.00277078,0.00040199675,0.000205911,0.0003445292,0.0014323903],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003568142,0.00011562015,0.0161051,0.0000065059153,0.00012505968,0.00003819374,0.00089079473,0.0000051240086,0.00028938247,0.9328281,0.047618404,0.0019419977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009558744,0.000100621466,0.032026537,0.00029053775,0.00007487365,0.00009243265,0.0022396913,0.000060740473,0.00020075023,0.24994172,0.7133792,0.00063699106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005353708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014887765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6828864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028762204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006735898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170212252","doi":"10.1017/s1744552307004077","title":"Bills of Rights as process: the Canadian experience","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Articulation (sociology); Process (computing); Charter; Law and economics; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Product (mathematics); Fundamental rights; Law; Sociology; Public administration; Human rights; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03309545042952662,"score_gpt":0.3659922449062566,"score_spread":0.33289679447673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170212252","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6535835,0.0005463269,0.00003159683,0.0065689483,0.0011834411,0.00007166898,0.0000038173366,0.0000023569307,0.33800834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99861205,0.000035547608,0.000015741269,0.0009179576,0.00034903336,0.0000011745318,1.6346252e-7,0.0000013009515,0.00006705315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988088,0.00003454119,0.00032646544,0.00005196457,0.00064159144,0.00013666089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986737,0.00020628725,0.00019012736,0.00003141155,0.0008215463,0.00007694708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083147845,0.000044973443,0.000096176576,0.00008831749,0.00026021825,0.000032877146,0.00047539026,0.000035784356,0.00012811096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028806872,0.000029342755,0.00005373625,0.00011361478,0.0007524055,0.00019247772,0.0000142786,0.00011427417,0.000008513885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003997634,0.000028327115,0.0076705534,3.5048177e-7,0.000034550954,0.00007650742,0.02453132,0.00000812844,0.000022400563,0.9650567,0.00007480767,0.0024563894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062573876,0.00007697834,0.016267981,0.0002441782,0.000011166422,0.000061751,0.031686816,0.0000023194498,0.001790359,0.3619804,0.5871032,0.00014910339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6852349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9602163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6030763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021589665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005820163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31686115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170984522","doi":"10.1353/wp.0.0004","title":"Courts and Judges in Authoritarian Regimes","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Politics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Legitimacy; Independence (probability theory); Bureaucracy; Power (physics); Political science; Judicial independence; Democracy; Accountability; Empowerment; Rule of law; Meaning (existential); Law; Law and economics; Political economy; Sociology; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.025589725471138473,"score_gpt":0.32374625112437155,"score_spread":0.2981565256532331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170984522","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1554345,0.0009228202,0.000024761304,0.011395485,0.00027751268,0.00007222494,0.0000033798888,0.00003240638,0.8318369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926992,0.00006067042,0.00015182725,0.00038776555,0.0004231758,0.0000012267637,6.5490065e-7,0.000002049242,0.0062734126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999372,0.000024263032,0.000098739576,0.00008364764,0.00013741328,0.00028390193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968934,0.00014055012,0.000017607232,0.000037959628,0.000029810539,0.00008472407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040206453,0.00004575803,0.000076422075,0.000080887396,0.00041928425,0.00002006541,0.000051910225,0.00002801632,0.000029802786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011616223,0.000045468776,0.000013667077,0.00013435145,0.0004830026,0.000047654376,0.000025766138,0.000067509696,0.0000122079455],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012869122,0.00001043064,0.04531973,9.898766e-7,0.0000030763983,0.000009412186,0.0017287773,1.4347734e-7,7.779262e-7,0.95095557,0.0011042579,0.00086556264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078576784,0.000004881183,0.15192471,0.000012561914,0.000004944339,5.3064986e-7,0.0030403063,5.621242e-7,0.000011149099,0.3674921,0.47735557,0.000074077325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012835726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059588425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8372647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007575314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008786831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9937379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171084651","doi":"10.1017/s0008423910000739","title":"Exploring Complex Judicial–Executive Interaction: Federal Government Concessions in Charter of Rights Cases","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Government (linguistics); Supreme court; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13768797842107863,"score_gpt":0.3486140388440552,"score_spread":0.21092606042297654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171084651","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94338876,0.00001738087,0.000011810793,0.004987414,0.0013045565,0.00005417471,0.000017502232,0.0000020463776,0.05021633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992722,0.000003840705,0.0000702888,0.00022392058,0.00041156085,0.0000020066987,9.905899e-8,0.0000013046579,0.000014733587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984221,0.0000465272,0.00028724622,0.000104466744,0.00057072967,0.00056896114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846274,0.00019674317,0.00010453845,0.000049249244,0.00026306126,0.0009236608],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006302823,0.000063463565,0.00016395548,0.00011904866,0.00093844713,0.00006105103,0.00029108793,0.00002700096,0.00023401974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010232527,0.00005174704,0.000050915005,0.00036462804,0.0035993317,0.0005776668,0.000021265558,0.00024117151,0.0000048148777],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050044027,0.00001585979,0.013242876,6.818849e-7,0.0000037354434,0.00007437897,0.0018325284,0.0000012148762,0.00056550617,0.9838461,0.00012463336,0.00028747463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003638942,0.00016304034,0.8789821,0.0002109558,0.00001668756,0.00010533316,0.02879024,0.000016207665,0.0018404212,0.058658443,0.03060615,0.00024651844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42718446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7061612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92518765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054216455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024860254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172283848","doi":"10.1017/s0008423907071363","title":"Misrecognized Materialists: Social Movements in Canadian Constitutional Politics","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Materialism; Politics; Constitutional theory; Constitutional law; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.032286514598969904,"score_gpt":0.3242228928127531,"score_spread":0.2919363782137832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172283848","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76961607,0.000086657565,0.0001079621,0.010083802,0.0021208439,0.00012491034,0.00009867192,0.000005829682,0.21775527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969917,0.0000024604312,0.000097242955,0.0019289315,0.00089647877,6.810648e-7,9.888576e-7,0.0000023761122,0.00007911983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966634,0.000054533797,0.00041603166,0.00013869416,0.0006115635,0.0021157917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99562055,0.000084812826,0.00007888759,0.000041981843,0.00055504247,0.003618712],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031811162,0.000092902075,0.00018155819,0.0006367722,0.0019025477,0.00015279766,0.00046294634,0.0000852949,0.0003572447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019590787,0.00009205991,0.00005937151,0.00075572473,0.009770283,0.00031408234,0.000015201183,0.00017759539,0.000026675696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003008589,0.000008319101,0.027268238,0.0000010081775,0.0000044607705,0.00016435751,0.0009315383,5.0042e-7,0.000034262743,0.9712326,0.00019189063,0.00015980979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059494004,0.000041020186,0.7220564,0.0000657513,0.000011533337,0.000051482635,0.009330089,0.0000026451073,0.0001597559,0.15231907,0.11505359,0.00031372005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97943485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99195963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8189135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044490006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035990767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99939686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2177845814","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1441","title":"Exchanging Constitutions: Constitutional Bricolage in Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Interpretation (philosophy); Law and economics; Charter; Political science; Law; Bricolage; Constitutional law; Globalization; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03576089819764377,"score_gpt":0.24850754259128638,"score_spread":0.2127466443936426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2177845814","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019424129,0.0023531716,0.00063371373,0.004457603,0.0010620331,0.00011588143,0.000018800403,0.000022739285,0.98939365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99725205,0.0007695255,0.0001701865,0.00107445,0.0005086982,0.000008555478,0.0000013206795,0.0000030080625,0.00021219574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983071,0.00013007008,0.00030946525,0.00015422581,0.00061074545,0.0004883889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993643,0.00012788779,0.00009817753,0.000062564104,0.00014295873,0.00020408093],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042895073,0.00011773972,0.0001842903,0.00007197678,0.002751491,0.000102378006,0.00021267426,0.000052615935,0.0015214822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017502037,0.000117281095,0.000064584056,0.0002942119,0.0016687366,0.00033047877,0.000038785394,0.00032126295,0.00006969555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031029215,0.000037578502,0.0068959696,0.0000013847795,0.000018998195,0.00023515531,0.00031957036,0.00015669625,0.0000044857766,0.98886204,0.002465037,0.001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014320316,0.000027949269,0.0037074813,0.00028928358,0.000044730063,0.0005260842,0.00911746,0.000199824,0.000017846887,0.23437753,0.74956816,0.0006916338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99006903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99936134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99530965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012755442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017219157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99939126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2178076620","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511996399.023","title":"The impact of extra-judicial service on the Canadian judiciary","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Judicial interpretation; Arbiter; Judicial activism; Function (biology); Interpretation (philosophy); Service (business); Task (project management); Judicial review; Business; Economics; Computer science; Management","score_opus":0.05538109875264462,"score_gpt":0.2396837323284453,"score_spread":0.18430263357580068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2178076620","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00041576006,0.00025398188,0.0000018487968,0.0005202838,0.00027345415,0.0004196581,0.00028553887,0.000028755403,0.9978007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37607935,0.00048214506,0.0000010807821,0.00029177644,0.00042522184,0.0000013703772,0.000007458003,0.000016509992,0.6226951],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871516,0.000106402906,0.00015202604,0.00023266625,0.0004120308,0.00038171053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860275,0.00029864078,0.00020761653,0.0002946841,0.00039049576,0.00020579108],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034518793,0.00023219018,0.00025825718,0.000086273685,0.0036013916,0.000041889696,0.00084119645,0.00026768883,0.000025879783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004892523,0.0001604917,0.0002837058,0.000025824143,0.0018979923,0.000042697546,0.00014252016,0.00042435148,0.000031141513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006016447,0.0000044481176,0.000012541802,0.0000018711256,0.00022408477,0.000029022878,0.0005548848,9.92371e-7,9.0722745e-7,0.9685278,0.029987464,0.00059581624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000116408206,0.00005060717,0.00081567816,0.00010654146,0.00013456313,9.887185e-7,0.00040531566,0.0000013308339,0.000006071115,0.0038017924,0.9943172,0.00024355423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9182688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55387133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96472603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063129095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021602581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2178976580","doi":"","title":"Canada and the Crown: Essays in Constitutional Monarchy ed. by D. Michael Jackson, Philippe Lagassé, and: The Crown and Canadian Federalism by D. Michael Jackson (review)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Monarchy; Cabinet (room); Federalism; Law; Throne; Miller; Sociology; History; Politics; Political science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.018469471603243727,"score_gpt":0.25226119102484107,"score_spread":0.23379171942159735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2178976580","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033967838,0.8217723,0.000001408274,0.13409685,0.00042628273,0.0004192802,0.000592197,0.0000035993962,0.008720303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6431863,0.34641492,0.000012189818,0.009879324,0.00022227521,0.0000207007,0.000004729727,0.0000057106217,0.000253891],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976799,0.00041780333,0.00050399825,0.00021893665,0.00059007393,0.0005892826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99778175,0.000543945,0.0002026869,0.00006746641,0.00059159525,0.00081257726],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022710343,0.00020035845,0.0006175171,0.00012728032,0.0022389505,0.00016815038,0.00026541925,0.000073931216,0.000016438646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019676208,0.00015241237,0.00006177397,0.000318441,0.007755822,0.00021173984,0.000073405885,0.00037835367,7.9920716e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004495978,0.000007561444,0.004293633,0.000021355136,0.00022257256,0.00025935314,0.0021504087,0.000001443145,4.4263905e-7,0.04410202,0.94244134,0.006454878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027088937,0.000021783297,0.0046885,0.00071434036,0.00011169949,0.0007053539,0.017083578,0.0000023131354,6.346422e-7,0.008047685,0.96562994,0.00028526507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99958324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6092184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006329642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006662601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2180908303","doi":"10.5287/ora-ryzz9jaka","title":"Implied constitutional principles","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliamentary sovereignty; Constitution; Legislation; Law; Political science; Adjudication; Interpretation (philosophy); Sovereignty; Constitutional law; Argument (complex analysis); Judicial review; Judicial interpretation; Law and economics; Constitutional economics; Common law; Constitutional theory; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.056443926534300755,"score_gpt":0.3057745821083418,"score_spread":0.24933065557404105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2180908303","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07481953,0.0003529474,0.0008146493,0.00082270167,0.00045443646,0.00074964034,0.000710707,0.00010006669,0.9211753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92902875,0.008113456,0.0015100914,0.000017069438,0.0003893464,7.8888775e-7,0.0013254784,0.0000203264,0.05959471],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957833,0.0006187276,0.00020449884,0.00058531016,0.0017102987,0.0010978419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972234,0.00058106286,0.00029914404,0.00031970182,0.0010450135,0.0005316971],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012102503,0.00030485587,0.0005590404,0.000962481,0.0055531226,0.000042143864,0.0015195649,0.00039319356,0.0013137928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025600765,0.00040544034,0.00038986737,0.0010302226,0.0076838406,0.0006295966,0.0005900643,0.0010328788,0.0000716098],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008644868,0.00022430992,0.0070949923,0.00008638481,0.0003268595,0.00009434283,0.010541522,0.000009452354,0.0001545224,0.9726708,0.0042542154,0.0036781388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006125752,0.00008821261,0.036870643,0.00016700472,0.000121279256,0.0000017720365,0.09537832,0.000008887506,0.000010058121,0.012088378,0.8542718,0.0003810598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014473962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07422329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9605824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006916595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035526056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2181249333","doi":"10.5235/108546811799320844","title":"Judicial and Political Decision-making: The Uncertain Boundary","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judicial Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Politics; Judicial opinion; Boundary (topology); Judicial review; Political science; Judicial activism; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07119389565167876,"score_gpt":0.3685869565634812,"score_spread":0.29739306091180245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2181249333","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035967373,0.24464656,0.00026534533,0.021868082,0.0011147986,0.00089590164,0.000014377132,0.000104643994,0.7274935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9373881,0.048444264,0.00022215555,0.01272292,0.0011372479,0.00004188705,8.4740486e-7,0.00000811105,0.000034444194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981566,0.00022537791,0.0003368849,0.000248563,0.00054316455,0.0004893941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897254,0.00048721026,0.00009003595,0.00015240787,0.00014088597,0.00015692435],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001145593,0.0001424034,0.00033911047,0.000032458807,0.0018382628,0.000047759568,0.00030767312,0.00007456035,0.00053333584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023197602,0.00009621095,0.00012256493,0.0003895708,0.0021006588,0.000117866526,0.00014724814,0.00018622569,0.00014491362],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001493484,0.000026709353,0.0009563941,0.000022914353,0.000020443404,0.0000132506875,0.0007433667,7.928877e-9,2.1594089e-7,0.9063125,0.010913532,0.080975704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005735113,0.000029392297,0.006897188,0.0010511101,0.00009015933,0.000005208915,0.00059689325,4.4326927e-7,3.544036e-7,0.47212452,0.51901597,0.00013140799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0082175275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031480172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9337914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008743037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005098939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2181985537","doi":"10.5287/ora-141mkzmmr","title":"The impact of implied constitutional principles on fundamental rights adjudication in common law jurisdictions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Political science; Law; Common law; Commonwealth; Appeal; Fundamental rights; Comparative law; Law and economics; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.039807210017130376,"score_gpt":0.3202354008130628,"score_spread":0.2804281907959324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2181985537","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48239797,0.000076930686,0.000045600835,0.00042197297,0.00011253805,0.0007574327,0.00050444866,0.00002469228,0.51565844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99245036,0.0024733234,0.00010619966,0.0000042282504,0.000046643927,0.0000013512187,0.00053831056,0.000006427589,0.004373131],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99697465,0.00066346675,0.00024766556,0.00039944745,0.0011221189,0.00059267384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975794,0.0009615899,0.00035108748,0.00028574487,0.0006066003,0.0002155816],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008242305,0.00022284775,0.00043464595,0.000671421,0.005297097,0.000040550964,0.0010845179,0.00024352872,0.00023693938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006544019,0.00021957995,0.00035185195,0.00085805415,0.007847788,0.0003875207,0.0002688595,0.0008578733,0.000018290386],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010446145,0.00030653604,0.0061241672,0.000019486977,0.00025343758,0.000018851124,0.0064656795,0.00009510612,0.00009835232,0.9832107,0.0013928034,0.00097030564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001985468,0.0008387548,0.2986147,0.0005716592,0.00011471334,0.0000019646711,0.1134726,0.00018350984,0.000044780143,0.14652476,0.43706426,0.00058284594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11698474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27737483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8366859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010587176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018355139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99599785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2184492925","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1283","title":"Research Note: All But One: Solo Dissents on the Modern Supreme Court of Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Majority opinion; Typology; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.07049475175959699,"score_gpt":0.3324198818464073,"score_spread":0.2619251300868103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2184492925","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02661791,0.0002720746,0.00007542369,0.02838688,0.0003060259,0.00012133131,0.00002190427,0.000008460573,0.94418997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99772316,0.00010902902,0.00004375243,0.00029442753,0.0006737969,0.0000043167197,0.0000012973104,0.0000056843837,0.0011445135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971758,0.00031012387,0.00024167405,0.00012777794,0.0016455669,0.0004990318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989062,0.00037381248,0.00009850885,0.00010607483,0.00039903578,0.000116387535],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014871467,0.00008703959,0.00015060262,0.000028128408,0.0027797918,0.00008107013,0.00040542203,0.00005780731,0.0001593994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014963838,0.000061052866,0.00006569455,0.00013746327,0.0008327401,0.00008485509,0.00006183169,0.00045428338,0.000011928797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030656192,0.000090390095,0.0006813411,0.0000016371688,0.00003578387,0.000022267219,0.0003580328,0.00013781693,0.0002450225,0.9856091,0.012461988,0.0003259517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002598749,0.00005987968,0.006479388,0.000089333524,0.00002280946,0.000009548401,0.0020675007,0.0000636647,0.00047235127,0.953979,0.036337104,0.00015950445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98770255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99730986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9711053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030875296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094672036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99851847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2185102743","doi":"10.30958/ajl.1.1.1","title":"Pragmatism and Judicial Restraint","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Athens Journal of Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Political science; Psychology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.07593698312700299,"score_gpt":0.338577253990625,"score_spread":0.262640270863622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2185102743","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55179965,0.0023973102,0.00017819458,0.013011868,0.00080405996,0.000069136004,0.0000026155556,0.000013146172,0.43172404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99849284,0.00019098322,0.0003053254,0.00036016057,0.0006042806,3.138504e-7,6.086856e-8,0.0000016926386,0.00004432117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993282,0.00006572602,0.00015321303,0.00003948375,0.00030678706,0.000106606785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947464,0.000058777605,0.000106943226,0.000023908775,0.00020741337,0.00012834027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007126728,0.000038280254,0.00010855564,0.000019175151,0.0002640835,0.000028770664,0.00007544706,0.000029268422,0.000012984471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023658063,0.000029866073,0.000032174703,0.00004865297,0.00066630857,0.00013908967,0.00002106691,0.00008123633,0.000007762238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012435579,0.000014520892,0.00067069835,4.3912524e-7,0.00001913226,0.000030081063,0.01089442,0.000001339051,0.000018820427,0.98599255,0.00055369776,0.0017918673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027780148,0.00009426187,0.0030808304,0.000030222634,0.000022826844,0.000043838736,0.0031212943,6.3366394e-7,0.000006456762,0.50566524,0.48759863,0.000057951704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003409854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019653933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48704493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035238376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020404764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51547015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2185131023","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1212","title":"Book Review: In the Public Interest: the Report and Research Papers of the Law Society of Upper Canada's Task Force on the Rule of Law and the Independence of the Bar, by the Law Society of Upper Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Law; Political science; Task (project management); Task force; Rule of law; Bar (unit); Sociology; Mathematics; Geography; Public administration; Economics; Management; Statistics","score_opus":0.03429307079856945,"score_gpt":0.2821942873073713,"score_spread":0.24790121650880184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2185131023","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043100342,0.0683003,0.0000015900739,0.5132539,0.0002964554,0.0014747276,0.00016482892,0.0000037552077,0.37340406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9648276,0.01558783,0.000004097748,0.019150607,0.00006375126,0.000018760027,6.2353917e-7,0.000006760038,0.00033995853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99527854,0.0013694647,0.00067904795,0.00018804759,0.0021039257,0.00038098745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966127,0.0016465565,0.0006424777,0.00049061375,0.0005500758,0.000057539415],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063941684,0.00016284896,0.0003738883,0.0000048795137,0.003537672,0.000043709453,0.0014117648,0.0000844098,0.00005819921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035408206,0.000054612163,0.00029137757,0.00032390634,0.0117437625,0.00012459127,0.0003639468,0.0009691706,8.11176e-8],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023679833,0.000037854898,0.0023710127,0.000039106602,0.00015824873,0.0000021860558,0.00537762,0.0000040599743,0.00009666555,0.91437846,0.07745753,0.000053586533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008772231,0.000084904736,0.010103512,0.0012051859,0.0001650286,0.00028564222,0.044369668,0.000018954268,0.001089364,0.035250325,0.90631115,0.00023903976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9788252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9924625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92172724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014707855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018272429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2187207196","doi":"10.11575/prism/38477","title":"Notwithstanding the Override: Path Dependence, Section 33, and the Charter","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Legitimacy; Politics; Law; Establishment Clause; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Legislature; Sociology; Supreme court; First amendment","score_opus":0.06634911045113165,"score_gpt":0.3143838268088106,"score_spread":0.24803471635767896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2187207196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.564989,0.00029255543,0.000058089045,0.005114624,0.0003420774,0.00033363505,0.0000060861653,0.00000192148,0.42886204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975179,0.00032691992,0.000025653964,0.00017794552,0.00030194074,0.000008915109,3.749879e-7,0.000001365311,0.0016390166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944204,0.000081119375,0.000069079935,0.00010255951,0.00019300106,0.000112194386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99974006,0.00011677304,0.000035690708,0.00005444057,0.000029567447,0.000023488601],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005401139,0.00004364045,0.000070078044,0.0000076134716,0.0027860778,0.00011663716,0.00018065026,0.00002398171,0.000306217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007664585,0.000021866615,0.000020908506,0.0001034631,0.0009578915,0.00017278794,0.0000965447,0.000072000774,0.0000463653],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005315982,0.00010972005,0.10638147,0.0000027709518,0.00024976415,0.00006931577,0.2687484,0.000014582062,0.00019158283,0.48837814,0.013854475,0.12146818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009105398,0.000026209691,0.047118947,0.000027722785,0.0000374653,0.000031817486,0.02387987,0.000031758067,0.000058077672,0.011829043,0.91588044,0.00016809191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057235123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054258592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.902026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024523186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007833714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99851215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2187276640","doi":"","title":"Safeguard the Authority of the Constitution: Comprehensively Promote the Cornerstone of Ruling the Country by Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cross-cultural communication","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cornerstone; Constitution; Safeguarding; Law; Safeguard; Political science; Constitutionalism; Democracy; Geography","score_opus":0.061787941519389114,"score_gpt":0.3584552499727784,"score_spread":0.2966673084533893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2187276640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6946632,0.010505754,0.00003112999,0.058552675,0.0006010729,0.001096117,0.00010769764,0.000056184967,0.23438612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989813,0.00038201537,0.000025717784,0.00037878967,0.00007147083,0.000017250708,0.000010835266,0.0000020012424,0.0001306455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860716,0.00040239765,0.0002783986,0.000093555296,0.0004766818,0.00014177867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977526,0.0003181192,0.00031031508,0.00048923737,0.0011009435,0.000028784449],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011985591,0.00009270392,0.00014017466,0.0000037978702,0.005012051,0.00012413591,0.0011773667,0.0000625873,0.000007691724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047746228,0.00003700471,0.00008356597,0.0002609656,0.016866533,0.00023064062,0.0003083287,0.0002657943,0.0000057968527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021953785,0.00002256897,0.0011504054,0.0000027363865,0.000033619668,3.5466183e-8,0.009226147,0.000056382225,0.00037603,0.9869526,0.00170968,0.00044785134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035986994,0.000027417465,0.012354167,0.00008233717,0.000084198946,0.000004373145,0.033780966,0.000057012145,0.00092897617,0.033637557,0.91854393,0.00013917033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017285742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047045983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.953315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000082637685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016187946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2189092689","doi":"","title":"Modelling the Formal Division of Legal Authority in Canadian Constitutionalism","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"MacSphere (McMaster University)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Division (mathematics); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03068214086792979,"score_gpt":0.257301192286838,"score_spread":0.22661905141890823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2189092689","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023467282,0.00034417797,0.00013951879,0.0003122241,0.0005860728,0.00022755103,0.00006310858,0.000014437115,0.97484565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9006423,0.00008177075,0.000037354795,0.000023187033,0.00009560468,8.673789e-7,0.00006697079,0.0000044300205,0.099047534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870926,0.00012584962,0.00016932415,0.00019129406,0.00042785236,0.00037640773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932414,0.00005141387,0.000115084265,0.000079386715,0.00026654053,0.00016345967],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042039872,0.00013834254,0.00021492924,0.00016157412,0.00083445647,0.000034701243,0.00036002405,0.00021368741,0.0028362744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043968157,0.00012785548,0.00008817615,0.00051077193,0.00046205346,0.0003324276,0.0000443151,0.00026846438,0.00001556394],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053046162,0.000019965504,0.0016275123,0.00001297146,0.00003416408,0.000033945285,0.0048823887,0.0039595836,6.231824e-7,0.9739134,0.0003308217,0.0151316095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027682798,0.000015064552,0.0007844962,0.00013818494,0.00005063257,4.0205603e-7,0.03120301,0.0005493768,0.0000023871537,0.0108781755,0.9558949,0.00020656428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9365833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9781771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96303517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005863492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032748503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99807525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2193413","doi":"","title":"Chronique de jurisprudence constitutionnelle canadienne 2000: le traitement jurisprudentiel des droits a l'egalite","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue du droit public et de la science politique en France et a l'etranger","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Jurisprudence; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.013972477641432196,"score_gpt":0.28753044133112227,"score_spread":0.2735579636896901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2193413","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54163796,0.002470683,0.011743301,0.06748674,0.0004978525,0.0006346511,0.000091384834,0.00027989395,0.37515754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905432,0.0028245894,0.0013173932,0.002447501,0.0004933222,0.00020141689,0.0000038353132,0.000018542518,0.002150241],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956835,0.00075876235,0.00043521234,0.00067491864,0.0006867593,0.0017608727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977827,0.0005222129,0.000160698,0.00029996914,0.00043870724,0.00079572573],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006535182,0.00028862944,0.00035962433,0.00033996807,0.002219183,0.00064273895,0.0010942561,0.00023044835,0.0004276975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002002925,0.0003215471,0.00017131398,0.0017190546,0.0073774816,0.0018904702,0.00011929396,0.0005241862,0.000044772343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029471605,0.00018845193,0.0100952545,0.000028669374,0.00002248931,0.000056612287,0.031115547,0.00006501333,0.00056513393,0.95575833,0.0007386184,0.0013629472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011637389,0.00011578938,0.12409313,0.00058220665,0.000051911265,0.00029587303,0.006710425,0.00086992484,0.00072395644,0.27149564,0.59260774,0.0012896687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11253485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07552234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6842627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022591748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055182637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2193855736","doi":"","title":"It Takes A Vision: The Constitutionalization of Equality in Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.059176632631270876,"score_gpt":0.3046179178950782,"score_spread":0.24544128526380732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2193855736","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011725537,0.00046974313,0.00029591055,0.02998901,0.00017474094,0.00010960324,0.000007339449,0.000007012617,0.9572211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99849874,0.00009588819,0.000014741325,0.00096778665,0.00003925356,0.0000039952342,5.801886e-7,4.313112e-7,0.00037860073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993507,0.00007303281,0.00013340611,0.000058011126,0.00029581023,0.00008898379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997027,0.00013522063,0.00003303542,0.000038012546,0.000072398376,0.00001861772],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023306697,0.00002962344,0.000062563,0.000010710807,0.00029749537,0.0000066762,0.00008390423,0.0000137023935,0.0011515685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016640658,0.000019695599,0.000014699498,0.00022168591,0.0005050107,0.000056723315,0.000010650467,0.000027616952,0.0000075628973],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001137439,0.000014228166,0.023835907,9.0394167e-7,0.0000039333045,6.5603473e-7,0.0013270415,0.00005426744,0.0000024561618,0.9656284,0.008445436,0.0006856512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002942188,0.000013492507,0.07354338,0.000048213085,0.000011030598,8.52887e-7,0.029382316,0.0003670788,0.000042849304,0.024554789,0.87156624,0.0001755236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98609614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99846816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9867732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001502967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006227341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2196217095","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1039","title":"Case Comment: Mack et al. v. Attorney General of Canada - Rethinking the Contemporary Conception of Judicial Discretion and Justice","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial discretion; Discretion; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Judicial review","score_opus":0.061486698478188495,"score_gpt":0.33806912484068713,"score_spread":0.27658242636249863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2196217095","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8124426,0.0012125213,0.00011637115,0.093533315,0.0005407463,0.00016382044,0.00006141176,0.0000038124776,0.09192541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903578,0.00027464065,0.00002889455,0.008755669,0.0005593193,3.7610707e-7,5.785059e-7,0.0000023057103,0.00002037219],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894786,0.00031449072,0.00028265538,0.000049509224,0.00029531386,0.000110163135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992845,0.00011890104,0.00034580595,0.000021672653,0.00017891703,0.000050178336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008368054,0.0000588713,0.00019404753,0.000020949716,0.0009196308,0.000018374467,0.000049244183,0.0000415021,0.0000059941244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001288827,0.000043790384,0.00004562749,0.000076836535,0.0009850893,0.000117163036,0.000015405805,0.00012688331,2.8625378e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002754782,0.0000148552335,0.00022614287,0.000008004749,0.000041076833,0.000019636527,0.015546596,0.0000021347025,0.00004635142,0.9798387,0.0040193875,0.0002095118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024440435,0.00032943062,0.0042949677,0.00017572638,0.00036836517,0.00030283025,0.07747563,0.000016367754,0.00023009162,0.2210586,0.69291925,0.00038466422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6922344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26022747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7587802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007017652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010321604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75327146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2197273205","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511770630.015","title":"Constitutionalised emergency powers: a plague on Asian constitutionalism?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Invocation; Political science; Constitution; Constitutionality; Law; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.03509510797279821,"score_gpt":0.24667522089690805,"score_spread":0.21158011292410983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2197273205","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000024843284,0.00036459242,0.00011652834,0.00075806165,0.0010675243,0.000572559,0.0008277064,0.00022254366,0.99604565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015565949,0.0007316069,0.00003153076,0.00038932456,0.00073268404,0.0000017825155,0.00011172155,0.000014224513,0.98242116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768305,0.00008927252,0.00029589102,0.0006098789,0.0008697384,0.00045219128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863034,0.000085469204,0.0002643341,0.00028166428,0.0004251003,0.00031307977],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020700585,0.0004355522,0.00047198322,0.00022680334,0.0020387638,0.0000482508,0.0005458771,0.00050817354,0.000109170716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000078419456,0.00051552476,0.00037613686,0.000028977589,0.0031250268,0.00014167622,0.00013142043,0.0005060378,0.00013888758],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010374219,0.00002851238,0.0000049843484,0.000007962232,0.000180366,0.00028604243,0.000173294,0.0000041543267,0.0000021347896,0.93428016,0.06392903,0.0009996222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044949263,0.000050108905,0.000042009375,0.0002108198,0.00017727794,0.0000065019885,0.00029824727,6.72853e-7,0.0000052224786,0.002340782,0.99585456,0.0005642924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028309461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026549984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93193936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006347924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012955843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2197325417","doi":"","title":"Administrative Tribunals and the Constitution: Reclaiming the Grail","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Law; Supreme court; Jurisdiction; Political science; Statute; Economic Justice; Constitution; Original jurisdiction; Judicial review; Nova scotia; Statutory law; Sociology","score_opus":0.031001477369231617,"score_gpt":0.3132962776162683,"score_spread":0.2822948002470367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2197325417","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11162944,0.06374594,0.011236786,0.49842024,0.0011832408,0.00093419774,0.00000794962,0.00008178031,0.3127604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848388,0.013771905,0.000010001446,0.00048239855,0.0005650856,0.00000944475,2.6532155e-7,0.0000017039719,0.0003203971],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983584,0.00021206166,0.0001620458,0.000096186595,0.00030480121,0.00086646527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947494,0.00022248592,0.000100622856,0.00005108246,0.00010364496,0.000047194353],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032865931,0.00008014461,0.000118977034,0.000017696004,0.0052707377,0.00011453623,0.00020173256,0.000037617025,0.000013468932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039175656,0.000040327915,0.000077168195,0.00018034871,0.0031947505,0.00013451645,0.00002726537,0.00079663674,0.000010705587],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004846052,0.0000093901745,0.00014143412,2.1515729e-7,0.0000757185,0.0000017312589,0.0024909582,0.0000061527408,0.0000018531285,0.9932653,0.000035071575,0.0039237384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007925253,0.000045810015,0.00019466356,0.000013618312,0.00003896378,0.0001405236,0.03263236,4.2383402e-7,0.000005836978,0.9345272,0.031546388,0.000061658786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024239821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022624055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87320936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004156351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005071052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2198078807","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Exemptions: An Ongoing Problem Requiring A Swift Resolution","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Political science; Legitimacy; Legislation; Legislature; Law; Doctrine; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03726322335472885,"score_gpt":0.30672317147724387,"score_spread":0.269459948122515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2198078807","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020472057,0.0003672371,0.014281156,0.0021180287,0.00022654666,0.00023048812,0.000006444635,0.00028283108,0.9620152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947222,0.000043309126,0.0030993854,0.00015461697,0.00080112944,0.000031462085,0.000013207851,0.0000020650689,0.0011326226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887323,0.00007385475,0.00019460462,0.0002011117,0.00036733877,0.0002898386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996265,0.000051537038,0.000047738555,0.00006747136,0.00014179319,0.00006495979],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045122314,0.000080162514,0.00009285834,0.00004125383,0.0021427707,0.000081849896,0.00010658993,0.0000606307,0.00022328175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006435046,0.000076693184,0.00004687673,0.0002339233,0.0016738311,0.00066143554,0.000034042412,0.000073056144,0.00011457856],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000505633,0.000055320437,0.0045740353,0.0000012809603,0.0000055884766,0.000002343365,0.00023078598,0.00019086144,0.00011508013,0.9933868,0.00069197046,0.000740898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003679579,0.000040943596,0.01270059,0.00006779586,0.000024380488,0.000005817518,0.0031662735,0.00009099884,0.000043784567,0.5487173,0.43441957,0.00035456754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02645747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04095752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97425014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015702019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027768227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2200636444","doi":"","title":"Introduction to the IALS Conference on Comparative Constitutional Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; European union; Human rights; Law; Political science; Common law; Constitutionalism; Comparative law; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Geography; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.2015297628570199,"score_gpt":0.3722443008915306,"score_spread":0.1707145380345107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2200636444","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55020916,0.000046659025,0.00069165416,0.31010324,0.000883169,0.0010056824,0.000027376393,0.000048422316,0.13698462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988112,0.00005174477,0.000062646846,0.00015876339,0.0007811566,0.0000025883212,0.0000021243827,0.0000011027553,0.00012871048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984724,0.0003494951,0.00007180599,0.00017875174,0.00069529016,0.00023229173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888724,0.0003750648,0.00003363052,0.00017921392,0.00044454326,0.00008032147],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013935049,0.000059398113,0.000108752836,0.00005109007,0.0027162016,0.000036247002,0.00049524166,0.000041443654,0.0004572149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017871664,0.000041140964,0.00004548972,0.00027947986,0.008374916,0.00013972275,0.00015751335,0.00035798343,0.0006037219],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070273694,0.000040454044,0.00009805168,0.0000013289545,0.000021859476,0.0000015178127,0.0543477,0.00002343098,0.00043900948,0.9260356,0.01861368,0.0003070924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012736552,0.00006211972,0.0027912227,0.000016258145,0.00000763149,6.6286964e-7,0.09439302,0.00000631945,0.00032052846,0.019068552,0.8831384,0.00006787619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007202407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023086786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90696704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000070983144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026024043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201174992","doi":"10.1017/s0008423915000530","title":"Questioning Judges with a Questionable Process: An Analysis of Committee Appearances by Canadian Supreme Court Candidates","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University; The King's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Interview; Parliament; Political science; Law; Politics; Government (linguistics); Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.022907291950736274,"score_gpt":0.3041602519042559,"score_spread":0.2812529599535196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2201174992","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9672486,0.0006487952,0.00014232147,0.009955967,0.00016152661,0.00008681253,0.00010124351,0.0000075600697,0.021647159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993246,0.000005692152,0.00013420111,0.00037470367,0.000113468064,0.000001846701,0.000003285497,0.0000028485465,0.000039313825],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99786127,0.00009414487,0.00026299414,0.00015800631,0.00076364394,0.0008599197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99456096,0.00005891485,0.0001240402,0.00008401032,0.0015532722,0.003618834],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017493147,0.00009158828,0.00026283576,0.0005620273,0.001036775,0.0001567669,0.000521609,0.00004727551,0.000059752118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012866938,0.00007377137,0.000042818585,0.0017765481,0.0043130764,0.00069647824,0.000007370773,0.00013349832,0.0000030141437],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005495286,0.00001152023,0.5026354,0.0000016869178,0.00004747564,0.000015891135,0.0019531532,0.00026675162,0.0000048777238,0.49453458,0.0004582319,0.00006490915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005820879,0.0006799503,0.8533881,0.00027155352,0.0007227192,0.00004559469,0.06651437,0.0007426284,0.00020291292,0.059570607,0.016628278,0.00065123854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9829285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.994852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43496397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011253468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025224682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99839664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201715422","doi":"","title":"International Human Rights Law in the Supreme Court's Charter Jurisprudence: Commitment, Retrenchment and Retreat – In No Particular Order","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Charter; Political science; Supreme court; Human rights; International human rights law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01111871589753691,"score_gpt":0.29258825410188016,"score_spread":0.28146953820434323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2201715422","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8937826,0.00045714754,0.000015292453,0.013095836,0.00049186806,0.0002000655,0.0000020435332,0.000010335745,0.091944784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99826664,0.00070530904,0.000014480853,0.00022741091,0.0004968408,0.000014397541,0.000002221602,0.0000025516101,0.00027013262],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982259,0.00014285477,0.00020982108,0.00014487209,0.00044581716,0.000830684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966305,0.000052780586,0.000066405446,0.000074677955,0.000099008816,0.00004405404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019907353,0.0000955697,0.00011588622,0.000057049332,0.0009189444,0.000106617554,0.00029088568,0.00006429177,0.00013107852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004160264,0.000064768494,0.000036474183,0.00015778116,0.00044694156,0.0002038872,0.000034843324,0.001133845,0.000016745258],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010953265,0.00009125428,0.031241143,4.1513917e-7,0.000031518994,0.000011209187,0.0018421357,5.2729723e-7,0.00009511847,0.96613044,0.00020235854,0.00034293724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008641472,0.00012978676,0.027793033,0.000030468267,0.00002061546,0.00004754508,0.0031006676,0.000011371487,0.000019376117,0.7316569,0.23614426,0.00018179695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0109748775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40007764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38910276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031039875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026958258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99561113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201732302","doi":"","title":"Limiting Constitutional Rights","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Charter; Legislature; Fundamental rights; Law; Law and economics; Constitutional law; Judicial review; Constitutional economics; Substantive due process; Adjudication; Democracy; Substantive rights; Human rights; Constitution; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.01583266659409008,"score_gpt":0.2871945297077946,"score_spread":0.27136186311370447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2201732302","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12081856,0.0051078196,0.0475508,0.0037897173,0.001165024,0.00013584661,0.0000020610664,0.00009675757,0.8213334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996034,0.0010028678,0.0000811334,0.00015766385,0.0017956634,9.759691e-7,8.079191e-7,0.00000218864,0.00092466845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972394,0.0000537469,0.00020304689,0.00010986487,0.00044761036,0.0019462996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948215,0.00012674609,0.00008682054,0.00003581004,0.00016054492,0.00010791823],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036881114,0.00007977608,0.00009940191,0.00007248309,0.0029154113,0.000046222474,0.0001694449,0.000059740618,0.00007068017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017997407,0.000069195,0.000085506,0.000201876,0.0011935683,0.00018661757,0.000020391806,0.0007995939,0.0000883305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001385626,0.00002169741,0.0031691273,1.9963082e-7,0.000049408303,0.000008501917,0.00030613563,0.0000022380316,0.000016851005,0.99033153,0.00008523358,0.005995236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001764424,0.000029397384,0.0008397508,0.000009933535,0.000013349511,0.00009381145,0.0047804643,4.805606e-7,0.000015632313,0.858524,0.13541616,0.00010055001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015689991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031761784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8752155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010012885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035223397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2205053112","doi":"","title":"'Remembrance of Things Past': Early Encounters with the Constitutive Laws of Others","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Constitutional law; Jurisprudence; Law; Constitutional theory; Autonomy; Political science; Sociology; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.014257599370401004,"score_gpt":0.2520512547176614,"score_spread":0.23779365534726038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2205053112","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80111897,0.005345597,0.005521093,0.0068007815,0.0003112702,0.00026779875,0.000004556847,0.000021689988,0.18060824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988905,0.0005235993,0.00003492247,0.00010567685,0.00015051702,0.0000022227164,1.0269312e-7,0.0000032309943,0.00028922473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850416,0.000099593686,0.00015412622,0.00007950165,0.00050204544,0.0006605958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992843,0.00006920096,0.00021997951,0.00005544867,0.0003205288,0.000050537295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016694216,0.00007354323,0.00015135088,0.000031148233,0.00037859933,0.00001655393,0.00026302366,0.000031195857,0.000005641774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000063310814,0.00004409435,0.00005753691,0.00021446646,0.0018042779,0.00021968059,0.00001763772,0.00041415755,0.0000036295985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011590994,0.000024224919,0.006140355,0.0000011847015,0.00017271897,9.678558e-7,0.01480239,0.000027918546,0.000056048488,0.9764913,0.0000987913,0.0020681897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014094805,0.0008371461,0.0014468984,0.00012950446,0.00013796071,0.00007561529,0.23628,0.0000031144912,0.000285591,0.7416967,0.017437682,0.00026031732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007851807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010612017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2347946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028532892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003943229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2205513482","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005932","title":"The Coxford Lecture: Judging The Judges: “May They Boldly Go Where Ivan Rand Went Before”","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Globalization; Constitutional law; Constitution; Common law; Rule of law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.013849219066436026,"score_gpt":0.2602579865963203,"score_spread":0.2464087675298843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2205513482","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34664428,0.046162114,0.00034120644,0.3476518,0.0051779,0.0012599424,0.000028941076,0.000043821205,0.25269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99574816,0.0010203437,0.000029463954,0.0018272472,0.00089756603,0.000011026037,2.539268e-7,0.000008302875,0.00045760773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814,0.00021076069,0.00036325748,0.00013479793,0.0005440079,0.0006071749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982937,0.00032815686,0.00025130794,0.0001750679,0.00044878563,0.00050295604],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011493556,0.00014980437,0.00020824878,0.000040341685,0.004786196,0.0005243692,0.0009582614,0.00007692991,0.000222904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003308903,0.00008079167,0.0001615077,0.0001958,0.0018580771,0.00036666612,0.00003255079,0.0004063003,0.000074770185],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001823951,0.000013818494,0.024208698,0.000006291456,0.00016859263,0.00007096858,0.021615954,0.000110368375,0.00001987818,0.89934033,0.032172564,0.022254296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017749966,0.000058068388,0.011705341,0.00010204728,0.000041846324,0.00002982401,0.0039421204,0.0000046807863,0.000010338238,0.07804232,0.9057463,0.00013963525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25581235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91285855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8735737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028833418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019418785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99650943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2206315762","doi":"","title":"Social and Economic Rights in Canada: What Are They and Who Can Best Protect Them?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Human rights; Political science; Social rights; Competence (human resources); Law; Social equality; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.014917040463458259,"score_gpt":0.24582604097679303,"score_spread":0.23090900051333477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2206315762","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9745604,0.0031881542,0.0000019403137,0.017054778,0.000076143704,0.00011960628,0.0000019897466,0.000004743744,0.0049922676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99132746,0.008041956,0.0000012420508,0.00014367476,0.00037492267,0.0000027666017,1.8481865e-7,0.0000018633458,0.00010590289],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986609,0.00007274483,0.00012544746,0.00011959496,0.00014441313,0.00087686407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997933,0.000023715784,0.00007739059,0.000022126256,0.000023618648,0.000059875274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049609266,0.00008442972,0.00015448491,0.000028245135,0.0011451944,0.00010052038,0.000092196635,0.00003826819,0.000006627852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013977057,0.00007019047,0.000021390457,0.000044823646,0.00013998967,0.00021275126,0.000013642439,0.00048508152,0.0000014340256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020727886,0.000013251662,0.024188366,7.9334285e-7,0.000037287344,0.000008129837,0.0026115405,0.0000024843825,0.0000030313731,0.9493165,0.000053803065,0.023744063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030053328,0.000050720075,0.040721424,0.000035371155,0.000012295889,0.000034378176,0.02435935,0.0000023658754,0.0000036226104,0.93051887,0.0038221607,0.00013890114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94555247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05395737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023012147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006438952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W220720050","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511498893.004","title":"The Critics' Case","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Judicial review; Democracy; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Enforcement; Legislation; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.029890337295410956,"score_gpt":0.2320442511581436,"score_spread":0.20215391386273263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W220720050","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000026590054,0.00067830615,0.00004974708,0.00019881227,0.00041311933,0.00021776577,0.0001406714,0.000083432154,0.99819154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008789994,0.00036593596,0.0000066607527,0.000059645983,0.00051299663,5.2662864e-7,0.000005600848,0.000009542341,0.9902491],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905646,0.000047303805,0.00010840911,0.00022111795,0.00029890347,0.00026779668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992127,0.00020663501,0.00008567825,0.00017443053,0.00022677287,0.00009383021],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014890573,0.00016531917,0.00016913514,0.00003679125,0.003573235,0.00007531726,0.00031052824,0.00019133472,0.0000031557572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026911914,0.00015448136,0.00015388752,0.000006430226,0.0021172795,0.000044208606,0.0001852807,0.00025104076,0.000019713156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008671669,0.000002366792,9.1281515e-7,0.000002984148,0.000046427835,0.001828988,0.00006944376,3.5178013e-7,1.9019734e-7,0.87500936,0.12229618,0.0007341532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009261611,0.000007661888,0.0000028229988,0.00002929938,0.00011167899,0.00002942969,0.00044878834,9.668237e-7,0.0000019253841,0.000504935,0.99857724,0.00019261878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021814676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017175517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8762811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000216159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025148966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2209081423","doi":"","title":"Private Law and the Rule of Law: Introduction","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Public law; Law; Municipal law; Comparative law; Philosophy of law; Statutory law; Political science; Presumption; Civil law (Civil law); Commercial law; Due process; Common law; Boilerplate text; Rule of law; Doctrine; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.006720396320282656,"score_gpt":0.24311547818501375,"score_spread":0.2363950818647311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2209081423","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3396224,0.0119218435,0.00463321,0.12436135,0.0012461545,0.0003416713,0.0000016788197,0.000052478197,0.5178192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955903,0.0026426248,0.00001498532,0.0003052242,0.0012604165,0.0000015310766,1.6677315e-7,0.0000018633249,0.0001828308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900836,0.00014282877,0.00011105372,0.00006280195,0.00018529774,0.0004896781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997374,0.0000614627,0.00007666191,0.00003997425,0.00006193234,0.000022616232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023377852,0.00004140204,0.000095533156,0.000011407436,0.0009835996,0.000025311738,0.000099703386,0.000023019928,0.000009136927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010725845,0.0000261113,0.000038167997,0.00005747076,0.0012743832,0.00009432964,0.000021313672,0.00032662478,0.000004424351],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027035741,0.0000069321545,0.000101879676,4.931666e-7,0.00003327093,3.190299e-8,0.00072053086,0.0000020216744,0.000029470766,0.99647796,0.000020060852,0.0025803049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027938894,0.00002889111,0.00011372407,0.0000028000673,0.000016424336,0.000008999991,0.00095347065,0.0000019617055,0.000026913962,0.8673962,0.13114083,0.0000304052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055008545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011557118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65596795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009804458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022735799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8315683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2209976097","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2992","title":"The Conventions of Constitutional Amendment in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Nortel (Canada); University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Constitution; Law; Democratic legitimacy; Convention; Political science; Democracy; Constitutional amendment; Legitimacy; Politics; Supreme court; Federalism; Sociology","score_opus":0.022409243237246128,"score_gpt":0.26300720225143637,"score_spread":0.24059795901419023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2209976097","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0069981175,0.00086715975,0.00049825176,0.022216808,0.000991331,0.00009509941,0.00002836103,0.0000049694613,0.9682999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99885654,0.000700033,0.000025671065,0.000120143544,0.00013102494,0.000004282963,1.8644232e-7,9.944706e-7,0.00016109511],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990201,0.00009449003,0.0002243536,0.000057733556,0.0003997858,0.00020354787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943674,0.00022592969,0.00009927611,0.000040561736,0.00012559662,0.00007190747],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004528984,0.000045652334,0.000084836945,0.00001342232,0.0013886915,0.000019880548,0.00015363812,0.000016664222,0.00017970438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000097785094,0.000025291482,0.000043288892,0.000072196744,0.0016888618,0.00008541485,0.000023272605,0.0000760697,0.0000069974712],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007309057,0.000013870561,0.0096938405,3.4529046e-7,0.000019505274,0.000008207781,0.000060472703,0.0000051328752,0.0000319408,0.98783386,0.00071679946,0.0016087403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060603686,0.000018502353,0.008221992,0.0001282185,0.000013852447,0.000021011165,0.00320592,8.444366e-7,0.000104915875,0.704057,0.2835098,0.00011193603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9826692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99963593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9918584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052550895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002356163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2210147736","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i1.4539","title":"Dishing up Israel: Rethinking the Potential of Legal Mixité","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Judgement; Dialogic; Context (archaeology); Political science; Legal history; Sociology; Israeli law; Common law; Religious law; Black letter law; Comparative law; Private law; Geography","score_opus":0.05974086345521199,"score_gpt":0.32363465804989083,"score_spread":0.2638937945946788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2210147736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8403584,0.0005878926,0.0006465998,0.006358121,0.0013219897,0.0003495667,0.000015123276,0.00004969242,0.15031266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978723,0.00012188791,0.00015965366,0.0005176579,0.00069972966,0.000006728893,7.317276e-7,0.0000062499853,0.0006150863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986236,0.00008966465,0.0002538192,0.00015891096,0.0006422316,0.0002317484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924946,0.00018837121,0.00014256692,0.00013586767,0.00021908715,0.000064634376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044278824,0.00008747326,0.0001870083,0.000053884487,0.0008948227,0.000053016774,0.00065639906,0.000059073056,0.00005959782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005418422,0.00006824193,0.0000875595,0.00031711307,0.0008305577,0.0003909162,0.00022758976,0.00014267596,0.00001642195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003769876,0.00023705476,0.023515927,0.00014741509,0.00029834808,0.00007241526,0.06006269,0.001293476,0.003648993,0.8903188,0.014035878,0.005992032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020455874,0.00038985073,0.6445803,0.001076831,0.0018262762,0.00003973268,0.07438606,0.00020045243,0.007836214,0.050625477,0.21534958,0.0016436387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01885625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013262624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8396933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031504253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024356092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9876773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2211408476","doi":"","title":"Defining the Charter: Judicial Activism and the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Centrality; Context (archaeology); Scholarship; Political science; Judicial opinion; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.009114417248697318,"score_gpt":0.24146629236731806,"score_spread":0.23235187511862074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2211408476","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7469176,0.07051813,0.00043130104,0.091006905,0.0016426962,0.00034759718,0.000008834768,0.000016313064,0.08911059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995478,0.0034258184,0.0000018927911,0.00025699733,0.00068899523,0.0000030949375,1.6184953e-7,0.0000026585496,0.00014242975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982054,0.00017025342,0.000127764,0.000048206497,0.00037387016,0.0010744603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995112,0.00023036094,0.00010586479,0.000042412146,0.00006082558,0.000049331637],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029106727,0.00006008717,0.000117044685,0.00001225923,0.001755143,0.000021275402,0.00016733525,0.000023126333,0.000014041941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018117682,0.000031953616,0.00004272168,0.00009238313,0.00068574166,0.00010901851,0.00003038201,0.0005297618,0.0000013080603],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002688649,0.0000067932433,0.0053210184,2.9717327e-7,0.00007907976,1.3459444e-7,0.002448182,6.670999e-7,0.0000033058056,0.9884031,0.0003470981,0.0033634293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001105883,0.000060809394,0.024961008,0.000024518296,0.00014289848,0.000096137104,0.088702746,0.000007752019,0.000032743388,0.81404436,0.07062476,0.00019639751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49708095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8678839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37080294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031339357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004456605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2211764790","doi":"","title":"The Proportionality Standard and Constitutional Culture: A Comparative Analysis of Rights Adjudication in Canada and the French Republic","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Adjudication; Political science; Law; Human rights","score_opus":0.027848066770329485,"score_gpt":0.2898196199180951,"score_spread":0.2619715531477656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2211764790","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88845146,0.010963227,0.00029701367,0.0137556,0.00028863453,0.00077028124,0.00017611543,0.00002024461,0.08527745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995378,0.00011762264,0.00004138036,0.00014371141,0.000047083966,0.000030159194,0.000009972807,4.656075e-7,0.00007180013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863416,0.00027842817,0.00024683616,0.00014732842,0.00056225795,0.00013097732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990599,0.00024400519,0.00013709856,0.00008422284,0.00037477157,0.000100012745],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012177548,0.000066938206,0.00021903354,0.000024245177,0.0009759,0.000053201824,0.00010938957,0.000030984927,0.000017932694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034359403,0.000036541773,0.00003093572,0.00051297684,0.0068366327,0.00013083206,0.00004176083,0.00011364816,6.849799e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036909572,0.0000077687955,0.06289671,7.683428e-7,0.000143747,6.429023e-7,0.0013648866,0.000025639472,3.8812166e-7,0.93422073,0.0012597268,0.000042100386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013756584,0.000025869953,0.3971867,0.00002730275,0.00028875063,0.000001744017,0.008523592,0.00012444735,0.00001376096,0.40529796,0.18694618,0.00018804272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96830106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52892274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026402838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002008251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2212773715","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199264063.003.0007","title":"Rights and Democracy: A Reconciliation of the Institutional Debate","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Democracy; International human rights law; Law and economics; Fundamental rights; Separation of powers; Law; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Constitution; Politics","score_opus":0.028763839981942072,"score_gpt":0.2500757557775318,"score_spread":0.22131191579558976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2212773715","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00046615035,0.0006501548,0.00003218558,0.0023883935,0.0003793573,0.00016292106,0.00001496709,0.0000123379195,0.99589354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23521474,0.00091190037,0.00015392278,0.0009076813,0.00032873673,0.0000063180064,0.000004854692,0.0000058433616,0.762466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992769,0.000024005476,0.00016423641,0.00013058349,0.00031518357,0.00008910925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958456,0.00005898809,0.0001152424,0.00006232125,0.00014646794,0.000032427462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018005726,0.000092256145,0.00014207144,0.00002611003,0.0010688253,0.000011874875,0.000090585,0.00013046713,0.00035150608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006275507,0.00005941416,0.00006930909,0.00002915165,0.0012869639,0.0000618612,0.00003685624,0.00009467632,0.000017971895],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021473932,0.0000031103439,0.00011802883,0.0000022844965,0.00002871811,7.3057805e-7,0.00018605085,5.56164e-7,8.634895e-7,0.99712735,0.001537115,0.0009930424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003868567,0.0000031561763,0.0002873198,0.000033002227,0.000019496767,0.0000011019393,0.0000141641685,3.2459442e-7,0.000004490803,0.53248644,0.46705744,0.00005434675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030630443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013065181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46552032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007746559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031281982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82206476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2214023420","doi":"","title":"Demystifying the Boundaries of Public Law: Policy, Discretion and Social Welfare","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Public policy; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Administration (probate law); Government (linguistics); Administrative law; Legal doctrine; Public administration; Public economics; Economics","score_opus":0.02183490505607357,"score_gpt":0.2959328215407892,"score_spread":0.27409791648471565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2214023420","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1662492,0.010067553,0.0033010722,0.7771284,0.00021687942,0.00017162922,0.000007827103,0.000040301657,0.04281711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971083,0.0014360949,0.0000124934995,0.00021662055,0.0010377378,0.0000025382346,6.160537e-7,0.0000033163612,0.00018228644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984296,0.00014110799,0.00015127938,0.000073829935,0.0003084052,0.00089575653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999695,0.000034308392,0.00010657583,0.000027965189,0.00010262822,0.000033527536],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015761304,0.000064550666,0.00010249682,0.00003872779,0.006025557,0.00019241322,0.00015065602,0.000045393215,0.000019026464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009564975,0.00004488462,0.000058406793,0.00014857645,0.0018682957,0.00026399706,0.00003066121,0.0004520889,0.0000020988148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006221889,0.000010434268,0.00061458646,8.4555865e-7,0.00004669109,9.3506344e-8,0.003113024,6.722771e-7,0.0000073532838,0.96230596,0.00001380697,0.033880286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001453491,0.000028596876,0.001686181,0.0000038038668,0.000021257236,0.000018107663,0.028577317,0.000002305112,0.0000046116943,0.68172127,0.28772107,0.000070137045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077494634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12782791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83085907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048486842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024164228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99885803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2215116227","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1086","title":"Interventions at the Supreme Court of Canada: Accuracy, Affiliation, and Acceptance","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Appeal; Intervention (counseling); Law; Psychological intervention; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Parliament; Sociology; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.02787806851561254,"score_gpt":0.29585967950311465,"score_spread":0.2679816109875021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2215116227","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18526939,0.00213901,0.00012852793,0.036819503,0.0017468403,0.00017441266,0.00004558297,0.000014609455,0.77366215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99864197,0.00028269147,0.00006911926,0.00016676716,0.00028956353,0.0000027604476,7.44391e-7,0.0000022591466,0.0005441311],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917394,0.000062127074,0.00019400456,0.000070999835,0.00033570096,0.000163247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931574,0.00016211112,0.00015643329,0.000063260486,0.00021992438,0.000082556966],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005390762,0.00005405096,0.0000926152,0.000010117877,0.0024406258,0.000049598053,0.0001837565,0.000032168286,0.000579042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034021496,0.000037941245,0.000060894305,0.000069839,0.0006687291,0.0001441076,0.00006341386,0.00020133327,0.0000026717814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006943631,0.000017804085,0.00606922,0.0000034782468,0.00002602598,0.000002367792,0.00053591724,0.0000049717105,0.00016390777,0.9855471,0.0066967783,0.0009254502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009613599,0.000061839484,0.20141816,0.00019921392,0.00014795442,0.00012202475,0.009202113,0.000015370366,0.0007521019,0.39477775,0.39194575,0.0003963661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8364926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81337255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007361561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039138092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99885803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2215504162","doi":"10.7202/1034055ar","title":"The Supreme Court in a Pluralistic World: Four Readings of a Reference","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Narrative; Pluralism (philosophy); Political science; Legal pluralism; Sociology; Notice; Plural; Majority opinion; Legal realism; Legal research; Epistemology","score_opus":0.11519907970680078,"score_gpt":0.32922301917405444,"score_spread":0.21402393946725368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2215504162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019364616,0.0005365782,0.000015942014,0.005454051,0.0004412435,0.00008957841,0.000017807719,0.000012985333,0.9740672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990556,0.00034752095,0.0000696462,0.000080310434,0.0001460374,0.0000027869746,1.8612879e-7,0.0000022184918,0.00029565764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988771,0.00016826711,0.00022470149,0.00006905013,0.00043831705,0.00022254267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922216,0.00021105989,0.00014514606,0.000048218826,0.0002652432,0.00010818982],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014794992,0.00005563945,0.00011998801,0.00003750199,0.0027033577,0.00003928284,0.00022182394,0.000026018855,0.000020985548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006793569,0.000036471072,0.000037858536,0.00024909014,0.00060073426,0.000120106924,0.00003910088,0.00021488286,0.000014934363],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023763827,0.000012932728,0.004130441,5.215301e-7,0.000012206732,0.000009339106,0.0005929808,0.000007771897,0.000002524641,0.9932707,0.00073512655,0.0012016945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022284543,0.000026375215,0.003209232,0.000043947854,0.000011205593,0.000009516585,0.0024183663,0.000005839199,0.0000075758103,0.12641533,0.8675686,0.00006116492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04815877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5039217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.979691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015337285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006234521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2215707769","doi":"","title":"Multidimensional Analysis of Judicial Decision-Making: Reframing Judicial Activism as the Study of Judicial Discourse (Or Taking the Judgement Out of the Judgement)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Cognitive reframing; Judicial activism; Political science; Judicial opinion; Law; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.038732947981404364,"score_gpt":0.34642035618820505,"score_spread":0.3076874082068007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2215707769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.988982,0.00072911393,0.0011202332,0.0013033707,0.0013082332,0.00076967315,0.000012981482,0.000012571506,0.00576178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99849313,0.000518446,0.0000405,0.00014177512,0.00070178305,0.0000200821,7.245217e-7,0.0000145193235,0.0000690373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99437636,0.00074478216,0.0010606389,0.00033381383,0.0021691408,0.0013152342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99649906,0.0007548215,0.001745557,0.00038221985,0.0005549707,0.00006338158],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005218882,0.00026915324,0.0006696959,0.00026626847,0.0027207714,0.000031567775,0.0012285426,0.000100261845,0.0002664516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014003451,0.00013610192,0.0005582129,0.0015397824,0.001490263,0.0001916355,0.0004179956,0.0010970952,0.00000541656],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028846038,0.004084815,0.082859196,0.0000074681866,0.015854863,0.000015515514,0.14266555,0.0011279543,0.00042698276,0.6476184,0.00032813122,0.1021265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027765494,0.0020206417,0.29672706,0.00034449017,0.009168334,0.000013774725,0.42774713,0.00020754964,0.00024855655,0.25839233,0.0017085128,0.0006450919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015277977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17477201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38922608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052341906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003507431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99857754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2218718942","doi":"","title":"Review of Florian Sauvageau, David Taras, and David Schneiderman, The Last Word: Media Coverage of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.007575240028243129,"score_gpt":0.22955393235381902,"score_spread":0.22197869232557588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2218718942","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44364575,0.4786995,0.00012457103,0.040533625,0.0013712671,0.0007227715,0.000107265536,0.000011005087,0.03478424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9094336,0.089901276,0.0000032875128,0.00022362582,0.0002928573,0.0000018595744,0.0000013061322,0.0000033902718,0.00013877665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814284,0.00018237862,0.00036771578,0.00008597966,0.0006001087,0.0006209539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915737,0.0001663988,0.0003291629,0.00010380967,0.00020818345,0.000035057918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016197334,0.00008920312,0.0002445921,0.00001917604,0.00055897894,0.000008901289,0.00034261527,0.00003183505,0.000030266014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027701637,0.00005252969,0.000082811624,0.00026777637,0.0006247114,0.000075523414,0.000053605792,0.0004531585,2.9760375e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003573296,0.00007385996,0.041269656,0.0001807572,0.00027455654,0.0000024950955,0.00094445475,0.000030672494,0.00021100642,0.9366796,0.012617539,0.007679693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010019551,0.00013017899,0.15709676,0.0033090848,0.0004094925,0.000088507484,0.009458484,0.0000036711706,0.00036169635,0.5154036,0.31233782,0.00039875117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43261606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94922143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5166054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028871596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064960998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99913615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2219920467","doi":"","title":"A Work in Progress: The Supreme Court and the Charter's Equation of Rights and Limits","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Work (physics); Boundary (topology); Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04732905307249376,"score_gpt":0.2689039740693228,"score_spread":0.22157492099682907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2219920467","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76821107,0.009290567,0.00003256332,0.07673276,0.00011183117,0.00062193855,0.0000013344662,0.000020666916,0.14497724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99931026,0.0003083948,0.000015899675,0.00010367956,0.000053231084,0.000014715119,7.964793e-8,4.960803e-7,0.0001932199],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995971,0.000070063645,0.00007185525,0.00005415138,0.00013432528,0.00007250229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99974453,0.00016371245,0.000024566081,0.000028229619,0.0000271148,0.000011829726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032536188,0.000029255156,0.000060071587,0.000009917225,0.00034946614,0.000021303073,0.000048109716,0.0000169792,0.000037401733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004145047,0.000013091877,0.000009901844,0.000119948774,0.0012980936,0.000050717743,0.000015348105,0.000029990675,0.000002890934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022678378,0.00002548412,0.02453774,0.0000011670834,0.000013628885,3.934706e-7,0.026059011,4.076699e-7,8.66597e-7,0.9411523,0.0008614347,0.0073248968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002389639,0.000081871476,0.3341848,0.00015584123,0.00006355037,0.0000016927175,0.015816512,0.00067560363,0.000033661167,0.5763706,0.06996644,0.0002597979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032665357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007118668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3647817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000566224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000067207993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4938047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2224804427","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1513","title":"Book Review: Boundaries of Judicial Review: The Law of Justiciability in Canada, by Lorne Sossin","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Law; Judicial review; Political science","score_opus":0.011113351055707644,"score_gpt":0.26355439568788336,"score_spread":0.2524410446321757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2224804427","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023004522,0.62640077,0.0000030010622,0.0258768,0.00019427255,0.00022351084,0.000043146112,0.0000036640733,0.34702477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62858355,0.34843686,0.000013070756,0.02252968,0.00020372648,0.000007851093,0.0000023180612,0.000004473273,0.00021845459],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976774,0.00039844963,0.0007163057,0.00013385426,0.00076312147,0.00031088217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990838,0.00016967693,0.00028552706,0.0001331601,0.0002355566,0.00009225312],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015163281,0.00011963241,0.00049184245,0.0000095237665,0.0014316516,0.00003389066,0.00035771518,0.00004060913,0.0022634729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002665631,0.00008476677,0.00011990597,0.00022100031,0.0028019776,0.00016914512,0.000031808726,0.00029177326,0.000006093882],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003104367,0.00008246961,0.0004954428,0.00027995434,0.00004533758,0.0000098723485,0.00039122303,0.0000058154,0.0000058177866,0.4606436,0.5328167,0.005192725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001305033,0.000021919426,0.00048677984,0.0022520006,0.00008782816,0.000006203017,0.00022990425,6.00842e-7,0.000023098011,0.020860404,0.9758021,0.00009862025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9933562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99814606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62835354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030218894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021396521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W22278256","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1499","title":"The Dissenting Opinion: Voice of the Future?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"FPInnovations","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Unanimity; Dissent; Legitimacy; Law; Political science; Judicial opinion; Economic Justice; Independence (probability theory); Sociology","score_opus":0.01526052438481915,"score_gpt":0.28046479761573195,"score_spread":0.2652042732309128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W22278256","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005224233,0.0035455038,0.0000069208854,0.018676976,0.001458094,0.00005734962,0.0000018986877,0.00000906264,0.97102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940246,0.002467496,0.00002595043,0.00018534018,0.0024262087,0.0000014481012,1.11379904e-7,0.000002450829,0.00086640165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999004,0.00014592815,0.00017459728,0.000060982966,0.0004105788,0.00020392542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995811,0.00010375293,0.000099425684,0.00007605487,0.000089413865,0.000050236846],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057108956,0.000054316555,0.00007579213,0.000004642789,0.0057633105,0.00009440702,0.00035266706,0.00003193583,0.00020874872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042419382,0.000027701415,0.00011317334,0.00012740234,0.00073075376,0.00010326864,0.00003220888,0.00018581044,0.000026002563],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073992173,0.000013297075,0.0011535574,6.497247e-7,0.000021479786,8.7282984e-7,0.00069517427,0.00000770047,0.000007593964,0.9818657,0.0008681599,0.015358398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000097651355,0.000007886169,0.0072832806,0.000038999555,0.000011669192,0.000016743177,0.0038468107,0.0000017840387,0.000021550093,0.1879489,0.8006668,0.000057898967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018517032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15560368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98880035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028331295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000089950736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2230338120","doi":"","title":"Judicial Review and the Charter from Multani to Doré (Contrôle judiciaire et la Charte de Multani à Doré)","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Political science; Humanities; European court of justice; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; European Union law; European union; Business","score_opus":0.008532201738574148,"score_gpt":0.273579888711667,"score_spread":0.26504768697309283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2230338120","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03872862,0.53763354,0.0021363143,0.39806116,0.0011292686,0.001288845,0.000050460116,0.000047782392,0.020924034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6788987,0.3022435,0.00002584599,0.014812481,0.0017545997,0.00006763193,0.0000021334422,0.00001792961,0.0021771733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948045,0.0011593236,0.00056051917,0.00037684437,0.00054663076,0.0025521745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832094,0.00059094443,0.00028188035,0.00016245851,0.00032884124,0.0003149255],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042216876,0.00034694286,0.00068484666,0.00005050523,0.0016485306,0.00023361713,0.0005007338,0.00018103069,0.00051924516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006385381,0.0002491949,0.0002599065,0.00042310028,0.0014661852,0.00045030582,0.00014853966,0.0020333275,0.000600505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007214239,0.000095735806,0.0005356344,0.00001862718,0.00059807906,0.000009700946,0.004712313,0.000002223773,0.00004952969,0.8357066,0.006524428,0.15167499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018433584,0.00018884265,0.003877973,0.0010279554,0.00069330813,0.0001505218,0.0073788865,0.000030371015,0.0000051314273,0.7710954,0.21326576,0.00044252892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08751187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06345124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6401701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000747073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024760345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2232287319","doi":"","title":"Executive Accountability and the APEC Inquiry: Comment on Ruling on Applications to Call Additional Government Witnesses","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Constitutionalism; Law; Accountability; Economic Justice; Political science; Government (linguistics); Commission; Constitutional law; State (computer science); Judicial review; Rule of law; Democracy; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01806762387391311,"score_gpt":0.29464252153701326,"score_spread":0.27657489766310017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2232287319","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22321522,0.0031668711,0.004030236,0.38169852,0.00057680765,0.0032024034,0.0005810844,0.0001257215,0.38340312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99180055,0.0022801186,0.000012489812,0.004695723,0.0006947838,0.00014494167,0.0000044713315,0.000003652693,0.00036326642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830717,0.0001269294,0.00014870783,0.0001580664,0.00060196145,0.00065718946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993404,0.0004056734,0.00005434971,0.00007040401,0.000057911373,0.00007121694],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00107901,0.00009338691,0.000119889315,0.000014096868,0.0019200684,0.000061252504,0.00016790771,0.000030455683,0.0003591257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000773126,0.00006330571,0.00005166675,0.00013051064,0.0005983283,0.00006863092,0.000023852685,0.00048959244,0.000059852016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023616562,0.000100802805,0.00010362518,4.777625e-7,0.000059710237,2.0693774e-7,0.002065233,0.00006434582,8.1099876e-7,0.9693785,0.0032430019,0.024747152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005041721,0.00015079277,0.0012438033,0.000025547586,0.000024392748,0.0000065868635,0.016853355,0.0000029802422,0.0000035903233,0.37241012,0.6086557,0.00011896611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011612568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048405775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7685853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013548222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065026333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2232336412","doi":"10.1515/9780773583412-006","title":"Law – Eight Days a Week","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Economics","score_opus":0.039020771828446495,"score_gpt":0.24464169124704296,"score_spread":0.20562091941859648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2232336412","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00049817667,0.0000030112187,0.000050307983,0.0010061543,0.00028724826,0.00016770877,0.00007105349,0.00014546796,0.99777085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89904344,0.000044607645,0.00015886108,0.00043832514,0.00020719494,0.0000017667677,0.000005084998,0.0000074193263,0.100093305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987776,0.00016249814,0.000090005684,0.00023421299,0.0004132804,0.000322391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992902,0.000058823225,0.000057280617,0.00013182913,0.0002118,0.00025001407],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020230815,0.00011893097,0.00016347597,0.00004558615,0.0015552848,0.00003224807,0.00031396782,0.0000952042,0.000014793049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004164706,0.00012506351,0.000078453406,0.000055091383,0.00085350825,0.00019437363,0.00023016606,0.000121778416,0.000036688707],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040741703,0.0000334332,0.00005926469,0.0000020819054,0.00003912906,0.000057824436,0.0011919481,0.000004812664,0.0000025385991,0.99407583,0.004237855,0.00025456276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039133275,0.00003441242,0.000050532388,0.000012169551,0.00004349443,3.539074e-7,0.0027293845,0.0000013915587,0.00009212454,0.00660619,0.98986787,0.00017073061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10141323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016166187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9874696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022845548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000121297235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2232994027","doi":"10.7202/1034054ar","title":"De la structure constitutionnelle dans le Renvoi relatif au Sénat : vers une gestalt constitutionnelle?","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.025203701991743193,"score_gpt":0.2691724840328691,"score_spread":0.2439687820411259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2232994027","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017650403,0.005135918,0.0018258748,0.016793681,0.0061954297,0.00019447955,0.00031133395,0.000071111215,0.95182174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944509,0.00081390917,0.00085988187,0.00040139837,0.001678797,0.00000434223,0.000009373753,0.000015434593,0.0017659407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964625,0.0009288233,0.00057507615,0.00035441812,0.00081969594,0.00085945445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979014,0.00031469148,0.00032800052,0.00016786372,0.00045501767,0.00083306094],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015889447,0.00034470373,0.00042450218,0.000090342284,0.016153645,0.00019538472,0.0004071981,0.00045612807,0.0002313131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005787634,0.0003351783,0.0002404929,0.0007282732,0.014774871,0.0007931059,0.00013200194,0.0010437266,0.00017403418],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055292345,0.00013776125,0.0014489065,0.000009670418,0.00019889839,0.00034033312,0.0038961302,0.0044246367,0.000055677265,0.9842785,0.0036796492,0.0014745647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011332456,0.00007157589,0.0005675538,0.00017754319,0.00014777372,0.0011289823,0.014697175,0.000035362198,0.000095722324,0.24093868,0.74066305,0.0003433536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15773371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12628536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9768005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025039867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002105631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2233759581","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2830","title":"Comparative Matters: The Renaissance of Comparative Constitutional Law, by Ran Hirschl","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Ran; Constitutional law; Political science; The Renaissance; Comparative law; Law and economics; Sociology; Art; Computer science; Art history","score_opus":0.10081063947438781,"score_gpt":0.3446688745290058,"score_spread":0.24385823505461798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2233759581","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018870389,0.0036591545,0.0011928206,0.009898009,0.00053779344,0.00017530133,0.00006023231,0.000020782581,0.98256886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977622,0.00011389735,0.000267888,0.0013276469,0.00038807347,0.000008390577,0.000004793848,0.0000024854069,0.00012460102],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813527,0.00035973548,0.0003332681,0.00014286918,0.00074288633,0.00028596492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987143,0.00021905622,0.00026567144,0.00008647111,0.00051716535,0.00019732935],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083231635,0.00013705835,0.00033915252,0.00001900583,0.0023582103,0.00010346143,0.00035932657,0.000055355566,0.00012472284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037694623,0.00009466458,0.000102232116,0.00015631631,0.00936012,0.00034159195,0.000053758424,0.00029282505,0.000071213224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058476697,0.000071499235,0.00020362306,0.0000011018597,0.00009968408,0.000004623401,0.005489893,0.00008138663,0.00006922245,0.9330233,0.060878154,0.00001908118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00097398955,0.00009300802,0.0001374235,0.00009665943,0.00005734229,0.00005021948,0.02108198,0.00001528149,0.0006235795,0.4714313,0.50520664,0.00023256193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040415294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08339929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9958752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012613987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000348506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2234089456","doi":"10.7202/1034049ar","title":"Constitutionalizing the Senate: A Modest Democratic Proposal","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Constitution; Political science; Democracy; Democratic legitimacy; Legitimacy; Law; House of Commons; Ideal (ethics); Order (exchange); Legislation; Separation of powers; Power (physics); Law and economics; Referendum; Sociology; Parliament; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.06944750153965605,"score_gpt":0.31411167005757473,"score_spread":0.24466416851791867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2234089456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034397685,0.00070979935,0.00032892617,0.016073136,0.00095738325,0.00014275135,0.000009169461,0.000044130546,0.9782949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998069,0.000060782928,0.0003090978,0.0006753428,0.00071011117,0.0000062421664,4.88132e-7,0.0000032802873,0.000165668],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864334,0.00020154551,0.00018433294,0.00009284007,0.000606773,0.00027115617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992812,0.00006357275,0.00008235664,0.000054692697,0.0003270414,0.00019112013],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011258095,0.000080959464,0.00010726308,0.000019557003,0.011015175,0.000105754625,0.00021176624,0.00004217372,0.000035461326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028154545,0.00005044324,0.000064863496,0.00015113385,0.0015118506,0.00025798538,0.00004886079,0.00022609023,0.000083823055],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009879343,0.000022038685,0.00019686288,5.9209873e-7,0.000028394727,0.0000264564,0.00045166316,0.000083448016,0.0000069481152,0.99736005,0.0013708126,0.00044287601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023793017,0.000018224258,0.000047480968,0.000028904878,0.000025472544,0.00015466259,0.003131622,0.000026514936,0.000029893585,0.2865539,0.70964485,0.00010053909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007512083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034882598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9946292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019338529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027696873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2235405925","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1309","title":"The Shadow of Absurdity and the Challenge of Easy Cases: Looking Back on the Supreme Court Act Reference","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Skepticism; Political science; Majority opinion; Constitution; Concurring opinion; The Void; Legislature; Politics; Certiorari; Original jurisdiction; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.12828090069208994,"score_gpt":0.33760563110301806,"score_spread":0.2093247304109281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2235405925","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028497118,0.2823924,0.0000069694743,0.08214552,0.00034416278,0.0014784334,0.000047109665,0.000023814215,0.63071185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83765537,0.16126628,0.0000062303075,0.0008167298,0.00012178371,0.000029174962,0.0000012733071,0.0000044370854,0.00009871338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978239,0.00064008264,0.00038741878,0.00018929131,0.00071603514,0.00024329686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99755543,0.0013302814,0.0002617364,0.00034859433,0.0004312472,0.0000727036],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044245077,0.00014385549,0.00043308528,0.000007871643,0.0008741308,0.000034140794,0.00053630996,0.00005081548,0.00011077111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013088259,0.000063469284,0.0001277208,0.00016828308,0.0030698872,0.0000939535,0.00015347578,0.00019120218,0.000039239152],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036030437,0.000025844367,0.00021638068,0.00011123511,0.000056386176,0.0000011789675,0.00066540384,5.7370994e-7,9.3134736e-7,0.99254763,0.0040834663,0.0022549422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028966687,0.00007219888,0.00036609275,0.0018456528,0.00012177473,0.000002587991,0.0009882963,0.0000039037664,0.0000075325247,0.05155206,0.9446256,0.00012459808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013724479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019364676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9409956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004534664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024834223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2236198013","doi":"","title":"Judicial Review of Constitutional Transitions: War and Peace and Other Sundry Matters","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Presidential system; Law; Judicial review; Norm (philosophy); Politics; Discretion; Supreme court","score_opus":0.016879873345429428,"score_gpt":0.2868477078884803,"score_spread":0.26996783454305084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2236198013","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02676767,0.917997,0.0023942022,0.029388428,0.00035645705,0.00026030806,0.000022077604,0.00002211927,0.022791712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7181645,0.279572,0.0000370889,0.0017844405,0.0003911649,0.0000030229687,6.54051e-7,0.0000024384944,0.000044674875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986525,0.00010649049,0.00018105717,0.00007398882,0.00024660674,0.00073931296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968684,0.000049644485,0.00008289315,0.000027487531,0.00006791354,0.00008522213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001584969,0.00007276866,0.00015870015,0.000037820842,0.00064751535,0.000008785416,0.000058984475,0.000035863784,0.00007072704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007205468,0.00006346517,0.00004959759,0.000101000354,0.0015382015,0.00019355502,0.000013154369,0.00031554702,0.0000056680965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009093981,0.000027258317,0.0043586986,0.000032835986,0.00006578524,3.0685226e-7,0.00071851915,1.06934344e-7,0.000021456968,0.99168545,0.00058624014,0.0024942763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009632177,0.00015971037,0.0051097553,0.002213062,0.000380297,0.00061719806,0.02014581,9.587828e-7,0.00001583741,0.41190028,0.5580282,0.00046566085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006408204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000960151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69139683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015048019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010615773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5667567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2237497123","doi":"10.7202/1034053ar","title":"Le fédéralisme comme principe matriciel dans l’interprétation de la procédure de modification constitutionnelle","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.07391410305977508,"score_gpt":0.3328778617831355,"score_spread":0.2589637587233604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2237497123","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015232556,0.0026316592,0.021874046,0.02273054,0.0014534548,0.0002159073,0.00007222413,0.000062177896,0.9357274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99571526,0.0005821361,0.0014618755,0.00059611286,0.000821018,0.000014272668,0.000005422611,0.000009881635,0.0007940103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997865,0.0006714572,0.00036801797,0.00017693092,0.00045507745,0.00046350068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987456,0.00013919252,0.0002484882,0.000086458196,0.0004067796,0.00037348596],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018174244,0.00016069348,0.00020015822,0.000051089773,0.005909437,0.00015235899,0.0002718299,0.00021064236,0.00004927655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030550724,0.00016448229,0.00012263226,0.00030726645,0.00226834,0.0005137889,0.00006239078,0.00043981822,0.00009994911],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032446347,0.00022076671,0.0011254239,0.000010128979,0.00005633201,0.00004287053,0.0042296685,0.002113683,0.000074456235,0.9892751,0.0015924969,0.0012266256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006709143,0.00006674143,0.0007214275,0.00012248247,0.00009285975,0.0005678481,0.011613585,0.0007935152,0.00018212968,0.19426872,0.79067284,0.00022697037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030271033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015149277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9804827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009875451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007546705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99538475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2237676564","doi":"10.29173/alr1429","title":"Common Law Cognition and Judicial Appointment","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legitimacy; Political science; Common law; Positivism; Legal profession; Politics","score_opus":0.026298492073448844,"score_gpt":0.3062235867004486,"score_spread":0.2799250946269997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2237676564","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027996013,0.053336453,5.2795434e-7,0.009876652,0.000067480585,0.0003505287,0.0000036152455,0.000019652487,0.9335455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84694487,0.1358825,0.000012917307,0.01633973,0.0002237026,0.000046287798,0.000011268037,0.000003785484,0.0005349614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992326,0.00010716088,0.00016656728,0.00014156807,0.00018514607,0.00016698103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996769,0.00012331433,0.000033328346,0.0000630726,0.000031892163,0.000071525305],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022098911,0.00008066326,0.0002141528,0.000004384017,0.0008236991,0.000026058713,0.000069599875,0.000032839966,0.0014433501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023245042,0.0000692977,0.000052038908,0.000097758006,0.0006929497,0.000111387475,0.000019530919,0.000053506497,0.00046010182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031581847,0.00002348604,0.000037602196,0.000039364164,0.000016866414,0.0000013822728,0.00015571341,2.6192595e-8,6.4023817e-7,0.9634481,0.0012071049,0.03506656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008599141,0.000018568215,0.000092011156,0.00066775753,0.000085984095,0.000002060429,0.000023534736,1.5332141e-7,0.0000032462076,0.048368473,0.9505597,0.00009257029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13362479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17457823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94935256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021903421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027756783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2242163122","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1343578","title":"Britain's Political Constitution: A Normative Turn","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Normative; Politics; Political science; Turn (biochemistry); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Chemistry","score_opus":0.01180599697637806,"score_gpt":0.28999878903030607,"score_spread":0.278192792053928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2242163122","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037797865,0.0060060155,0.0064880797,0.06614025,0.00053836923,0.0002024213,0.000005601642,0.000111658315,0.88270974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958832,0.0014253351,0.000028310007,0.0011247705,0.001100867,0.0000016622591,8.502967e-7,0.0000017400782,0.00043324233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99693817,0.0001264983,0.00018957643,0.00011202896,0.00040394577,0.0022297965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948037,0.000053576026,0.00006662384,0.00004734109,0.00018465471,0.00016744075],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011444499,0.000097237906,0.00014339977,0.0000574942,0.0016775103,0.00007687312,0.00018990376,0.000065402455,0.000048150512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026592813,0.00008608175,0.00010346757,0.00021167533,0.00070271373,0.00028472338,0.000014507885,0.00089853944,0.00008766881],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014564606,0.000039016813,0.00044999944,2.2288779e-7,0.000037919617,0.000007002709,0.0005449392,0.0000012479819,0.00000889983,0.9899,0.00020659858,0.008789584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023613087,0.00012367206,0.0011698612,0.000012517338,0.000020021438,0.00014797566,0.013604685,0.0000015881643,0.0000051231923,0.95042914,0.03413115,0.000118120704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013917744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041754837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95808536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013126876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005232275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2243355986","doi":"","title":"Book Review – Courting the Right (The Charter Revolution & the Court Party by F.L. Morton & Rainer Knopff)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Politics; Scrutiny; Power (physics); Argument (complex analysis)","score_opus":0.0073709847871862005,"score_gpt":0.26054633268501415,"score_spread":0.253175347897828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2243355986","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009969646,0.6464379,0.0001217109,0.3200526,0.00020480038,0.00039154105,0.00000307032,0.000026786187,0.03176466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23505612,0.70813346,0.0000011087544,0.026776707,0.0017288029,0.000042840617,0.0000026181517,0.000009362234,0.028248966],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99704415,0.0004898149,0.00031224426,0.00014862481,0.0006118714,0.0013932919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993397,0.00015006594,0.00018647162,0.00015204074,0.00011999263,0.00005173345],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00474178,0.00013486856,0.00017120778,0.000010147569,0.0049814866,0.000079675694,0.0005106443,0.000045320423,0.0015217585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010518283,0.00005830589,0.00017205815,0.00023955651,0.00075357605,0.00019636405,0.00002404451,0.0012122056,0.00018663295],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013753902,0.000029840798,0.00011694355,0.000003431663,0.00014571699,0.00000121764,0.0008326275,0.0000043622217,0.000009045257,0.14237612,0.83410263,0.022364307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009891302,0.000027944085,0.00014660649,0.00009541463,0.000099655335,0.000044202978,0.00083129364,0.0000085643005,0.0000018317669,0.045767967,0.95278496,0.000092675335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010760436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026104203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2932759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047279886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011579886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99939096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2243918626","doi":"","title":"Power without Law: The Supreme Court of Canada, the Marshall Decisions, and the Failure of Judicial Activism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Judicial activism; Legislature; Treaty; Power (physics); Judicial opinion; Order (exchange); Judicial review; Economics","score_opus":0.007444319181734406,"score_gpt":0.244346432582229,"score_spread":0.23690211340049458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2243918626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8552505,0.0037867392,0.00015609941,0.09863851,0.000629533,0.00034304414,0.000010748766,0.0000066844736,0.04117818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99794346,0.0012554495,0.000007016264,0.0003022205,0.00029224862,0.0000034768075,1.3554082e-7,0.0000039266292,0.00019203575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981552,0.00021022529,0.00021270069,0.00008404688,0.0006331625,0.0007046777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988389,0.0006093722,0.00019673027,0.00011506978,0.00019810308,0.00004180683],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033807699,0.00008436881,0.00017438321,0.000014535453,0.0018277685,0.000032019198,0.00045656157,0.000048900656,0.00003653497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048069275,0.00003658594,0.00007593414,0.0001228507,0.0021673322,0.000073659525,0.000063763415,0.0011573184,5.9054923e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070787544,0.000011198977,0.0014952902,2.3809271e-7,0.00010734568,3.3297056e-7,0.0013969608,0.0000013012406,0.00009287434,0.9952822,0.000675694,0.00086581917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058005436,0.00004823718,0.00754528,0.00001648721,0.0000694355,0.00004900626,0.022484483,0.0000037209545,0.0000428929,0.9169303,0.052143607,0.00008650615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4307013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9848487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5541474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000117358235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005740369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2243978188","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvddzh07.22","title":"Constitutional Change in Canada after Charlottetown","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Verlag Barbara Budrich eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Climatology; Geography; Geology","score_opus":0.03655145599869222,"score_gpt":0.24919989050691643,"score_spread":0.2126484345082242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2243978188","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00077526586,0.006568935,0.0000038740286,0.0006199994,0.00174951,0.0006317806,0.00022946433,0.00005336956,0.9893678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8951942,0.0006154304,0.00002012996,0.0019965167,0.0026360422,0.00024088108,0.000027056421,0.000022649463,0.099247105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973347,0.000050940533,0.0004213506,0.00043090843,0.0010153108,0.00074675446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990658,0.00011899316,0.00015931018,0.00020456019,0.00016290971,0.0002884167],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028850746,0.0004129638,0.0005188868,0.00011813889,0.0005258615,0.000040279065,0.00032106586,0.0003310578,0.0024620513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037333208,0.00042231582,0.00013947069,0.000047645462,0.0017538009,0.00013529751,0.00014812003,0.0004987265,0.000329926],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027084225,0.000010457527,0.00444046,0.000012065083,0.00006310266,0.00014479726,0.0012696055,2.6884985e-7,9.619965e-7,0.9793564,0.0011656927,0.013509071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001975436,0.0000104841565,0.00551531,0.00018021971,0.000056963334,0.000004344811,0.0001330113,5.811143e-7,0.000001247712,0.0106915515,0.9826573,0.00055142795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91529816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98794603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9814916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019639179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046815653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2244223146","doi":"10.7202/1034052ar","title":"The Senate Reference: Constitutional Change and Democracy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Parliament; Constitution; Separation of powers; Political science; Deliberation; Law; Status quo; Institution; Constitutional court; Judicial review; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.15372066724890415,"score_gpt":0.3311755309311911,"score_spread":0.17745486368228697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2244223146","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056951246,0.0027940203,0.00002117825,0.023243159,0.00097054173,0.00010357175,0.000018652301,0.000028079674,0.96712565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972712,0.0013558981,0.000050472343,0.00051575253,0.00069104414,0.000004832168,4.6761372e-7,0.0000015490871,0.00010880266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990521,0.000113452494,0.00012773488,0.00007916628,0.0003988046,0.0002287417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934554,0.000081926984,0.00006492486,0.000036348763,0.00026710902,0.00020415359],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088659493,0.00006214629,0.00007853869,0.000014140504,0.014646414,0.00010795205,0.00012141552,0.00004047407,0.00001935554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019610496,0.000039303795,0.00002612303,0.00007883086,0.0026272074,0.00025000272,0.00005350042,0.00017937509,0.00004015358],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001110931,0.000007261175,0.0005961527,2.814763e-7,0.000015370319,0.000011406185,0.00023818458,3.5720194e-7,0.0000011055532,0.9940127,0.00050311745,0.004602913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016099068,0.00001348124,0.0006364273,0.000012153991,0.000008568744,0.00006131835,0.0014978405,0.000001302847,0.0000041970807,0.13936985,0.8581758,0.000058050824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004495276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025806025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9915761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008599968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000067524496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9919705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2244952839","doi":"","title":"IDENTITY'S IMPORTANCE: REFLECTIONS OF - AND ON - DIVERSITY","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Diversity (politics); Variety (cybernetics); Jurisprudence; Identity (music); Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.02873111187568932,"score_gpt":0.32686611651617864,"score_spread":0.2981350046404893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2244952839","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90862757,0.002128041,0.0005044429,0.002258198,0.00015555945,0.00004961696,0.0000011327617,0.0000141449245,0.08626127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9787876,0.020317342,0.0000070712817,0.00006574131,0.00021210437,4.8624145e-7,1.611907e-7,0.0000013207684,0.0006081755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990091,0.00004075153,0.0000899352,0.00006806932,0.000254711,0.00053745497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997703,0.000025202882,0.00006678277,0.00002863453,0.0000684441,0.000040624745],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007774149,0.0000405626,0.0000752597,0.00004641034,0.0017650757,0.000016443986,0.00009661024,0.000028309258,0.000034190813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000079147896,0.000037035385,0.000040299146,0.0001889443,0.00025774853,0.00019956415,0.000045310837,0.0003384955,0.000005168734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017498336,0.00002373274,0.08340511,2.7228378e-7,0.000039631228,0.0000017943443,0.00058678695,0.0000013582178,0.00001298973,0.91385466,0.000044751585,0.002011403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014947781,0.000100496865,0.02089084,0.0000068885893,0.000021157715,0.000026099131,0.008486575,3.0345961e-7,0.000002399691,0.96301883,0.007244538,0.000052366802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042442433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07981598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0856531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032031102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006026637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2247161180","doi":"","title":"Chief Justice Lamer and Some Myths About Judicial Activism","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Mythology; Economic Justice; Political science; Parliament; Law; Judicial activism; Legislature; Ignorance; Judicial review; Politics; History","score_opus":0.009802861528799391,"score_gpt":0.27278174402734917,"score_spread":0.2629788824985498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2247161180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6934851,0.024114834,0.00027014382,0.01341727,0.0007554189,0.00020312831,0.0000049679074,0.00008987697,0.26765925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94112724,0.052467063,0.000011334703,0.00057838165,0.0024630143,0.00000357887,5.0832955e-7,0.0000070754418,0.0033418112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997632,0.00010719029,0.00016448137,0.00016261115,0.00037701323,0.0015566951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965227,0.00006380733,0.000065215725,0.000048471473,0.000056195684,0.00011406351],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009549758,0.000115021605,0.00016342322,0.000049356815,0.0020879286,0.00008389894,0.00016016484,0.00007452513,0.00024154855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008376359,0.000102358805,0.00006867201,0.00015886888,0.00052993716,0.00035503195,0.000020171712,0.000895309,0.000098167846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044227592,0.000037574282,0.0003012858,9.3422125e-7,0.000086044725,0.000004217386,0.0013325847,0.0000028719628,0.000027606404,0.85180134,0.00025207823,0.14610924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053928647,0.00014630506,0.0054958076,0.00002580394,0.00015607405,0.00008670269,0.008840647,0.000004310373,0.000009611802,0.8382136,0.14622013,0.00026170816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022674946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057970486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26431745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036911905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019228202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2248683898","doi":"","title":"Chapter 13: Taking Competence Seriously","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Charter; Political science; Social rights; Law and economics; Judicial review; Law; Public administration; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.017863995522248526,"score_gpt":0.2891797098480398,"score_spread":0.27131571432579127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2248683898","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4988139,0.008208333,0.018736558,0.0063343327,0.0010683493,0.00016850083,0.0000010942886,0.00010636994,0.46656257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99489194,0.003230738,0.000052840533,0.00027894077,0.00088786724,7.210176e-7,2.0540014e-7,0.00000470359,0.00065202115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975266,0.000032632564,0.00017343297,0.00011042297,0.000379948,0.0017769525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957556,0.000052548585,0.00012801336,0.00004403014,0.00011293147,0.00008692244],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026083186,0.00008040982,0.00010460546,0.000056049947,0.0015576155,0.00004723444,0.00021225707,0.000044214277,0.00008590551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010979215,0.000071571114,0.00007375243,0.00015194669,0.0003281476,0.00016534397,0.000027383936,0.0007076898,0.000067896646],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013217911,0.000011210065,0.0069539906,2.5003894e-7,0.000033894674,0.0000077690265,0.0009077262,0.0000021449036,0.000057222063,0.9622597,0.0000085794045,0.029744267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025735036,0.00010157056,0.0141386045,0.000023510887,0.000021014213,0.00013087533,0.019594586,0.0000019787394,0.000021813437,0.90201855,0.06347642,0.00021373847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043182354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1054993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49607807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005418078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011338106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253166203","doi":"","title":"Canadian Proportionality Analysis: 5 1/2 Myths","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Charter; Cognitive reframing; Jurisprudence; Mythology; Political science; Law; Democracy; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Politics; History","score_opus":0.01131291938189996,"score_gpt":0.2737128434505579,"score_spread":0.262399924068658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253166203","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30150288,0.009135911,0.01766554,0.22612165,0.0012131772,0.00045891566,0.000050312923,0.00016022331,0.44369137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924749,0.0027496058,0.000009896193,0.00019344674,0.0005217748,0.0000041881717,9.153415e-7,0.0000027291856,0.004042531],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975027,0.00010783399,0.0001707169,0.00012767667,0.00038214575,0.0017089576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942315,0.000036546975,0.00007838049,0.00006001766,0.00019078107,0.00021110148],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020299454,0.000070133145,0.00012442656,0.00015595424,0.0013861142,0.000036590696,0.00019125616,0.000050306826,0.00031621236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020354318,0.00004565514,0.00014586224,0.0005033966,0.0002626899,0.00017247022,0.000011440261,0.00030057246,0.00009947704],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046590876,0.000010039245,0.04828333,1.12397316e-7,0.00043821722,0.0000025236109,0.0001690502,0.0000010518088,0.000005756579,0.94007915,0.0001609729,0.010845119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013732407,0.000026376563,0.01933276,0.000005954837,0.00016186964,0.0000107854,0.0035694095,3.6912107e-7,0.0000026078958,0.89460415,0.08202609,0.00012230378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35514897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9747833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69097203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031592578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014750453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253485966","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781316106327","title":"Human Dignity","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":156,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Autonomy; Value (mathematics); Law; Democracy; Political science; Constitutional court; Constitutional law; Scope (computer science); Human rights; Expression (computer science); German; Philosophy; Politics; Constitution; Computer science","score_opus":0.05664718749141537,"score_gpt":0.26194559666526895,"score_spread":0.20529840917385359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253485966","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008231736,0.00022165554,0.00001506595,0.000045390752,0.00034513304,0.0002745382,0.00016984034,0.00016858452,0.9986775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0029599376,0.000050872346,0.0000071362797,0.000063749,0.00073689985,7.066817e-7,0.000033004435,0.0000106622865,0.996137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986391,0.00012439267,0.00011058142,0.00030153993,0.0005211893,0.0003031967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904877,0.000040550098,0.0001285659,0.00018582975,0.00036431343,0.00023195846],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002475011,0.00019724407,0.00029759432,0.00007791739,0.0014903743,0.000048238333,0.0004992897,0.000302232,0.0000057189527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038222934,0.00023568049,0.00014866471,0.000016953421,0.0015347066,0.00008438364,0.00031285587,0.0003258083,0.000042862976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005663511,0.0000063370494,0.0000034895606,0.0000050783665,0.000044600874,0.000050780363,0.0001925601,1.1296395e-7,7.0633513e-7,0.6000531,0.3994989,0.00013872275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002009835,0.000017802742,0.00002755188,0.00005421584,0.00011761847,5.7170575e-7,0.00041924254,1.4252026e-7,0.000002460943,0.00063503406,0.9982496,0.0002748015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010913767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044439733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59941804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008579358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014244204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253647920","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1510","title":"Law's Expression: The Promise and Perils of Judicial Opinion Writing in Canadian Constitutional Law","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Minimalism (technical communication); Law; Expression (computer science); Function (biology); Democracy; Public opinion; Judicial opinion; Constitutional law; Political science; Judicial review; Sociology; Politics; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.02464647210379686,"score_gpt":0.28659102424150984,"score_spread":0.261944552137713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253647920","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014460454,0.0019041821,0.00000506631,0.0043062684,0.0002559597,0.00014176514,0.000021290556,0.000008169758,0.97889686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978646,0.00062527973,0.0000913545,0.0006407826,0.000734969,0.0000069167218,0.000001680195,0.0000028733534,0.00003151069],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987003,0.00016525587,0.0002890597,0.00012585906,0.00036124967,0.00035825852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946105,0.00009486212,0.00007630543,0.00005313995,0.00009789368,0.0002167463],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082462816,0.00009123073,0.00016182034,0.000028038627,0.0031740176,0.00010520077,0.00016770321,0.00007592692,0.0005475946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004609398,0.00006935484,0.00005249808,0.00010585215,0.0035265288,0.00025470994,0.00002329949,0.00025095098,0.000008153137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021694792,0.000020808522,0.0016612448,0.0000022735044,0.000010318567,0.00001644807,0.0011244854,0.000022549055,0.000038000304,0.9956309,0.000109685665,0.0013415888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010490867,0.00006272106,0.0048627686,0.0005600666,0.000023696708,0.00016856122,0.0046542785,0.000014270864,0.0001316697,0.50385255,0.48430374,0.00031657677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90327275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98057884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98340416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001215873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058559317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253865097","doi":"","title":"The Case for Tribunal Standing in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Law; Political science; Judicial review","score_opus":0.0328976387030361,"score_gpt":0.26286598089022156,"score_spread":0.22996834218718545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253865097","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9853726,0.0003087596,0.00016052937,0.0022612717,0.0002629967,0.00023991603,0.00004752422,0.000011177638,0.01133524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991511,0.000049548566,0.00009453602,0.000054827276,0.000077532866,3.4695097e-7,0.000002333418,0.000003287641,0.0005664661],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988402,0.000089027795,0.00013797637,0.00016449604,0.00033660588,0.00043170538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988273,0.0007049279,0.0001002156,0.00009277608,0.00015339338,0.00012142947],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002008252,0.00007992527,0.00014654882,0.000068122055,0.00310468,0.000019170084,0.00029343762,0.000066006505,0.000052308922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032381367,0.000080834645,0.00007545608,0.00037809872,0.0004541411,0.00022416768,0.00008529719,0.00016453724,0.0000037983152],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010958533,0.000068560905,0.7295411,0.000020321331,0.0001356479,0.0017923147,0.010427875,0.000030001083,0.00021824229,0.23935801,0.001579882,0.015732149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024112102,0.000079532394,0.51162386,0.00008023036,0.00007780181,0.000048314556,0.2441104,0.000015595973,0.00022441009,0.01885354,0.2219911,0.00048399402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.883772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23368253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011803168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011839982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99819314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W225416150","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511511035.022","title":"Democratic Decision Making as the First Principle of Contemporary Constitutionalism","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Society of Canada; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Law; Democracy; Political science; Politics; Sovereignty; Law and economics; Popular sovereignty; State (computer science); Constitutional theory; Separation of powers; Constitutional law; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03674468500323188,"score_gpt":0.2565373470676617,"score_spread":0.2197926620644298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W225416150","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002897057,0.00081491994,0.00039551928,0.00016187213,0.00031420495,0.00047060862,0.00016281447,0.000051381227,0.99733895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3168524,0.00010345493,0.000035012574,0.0001590883,0.00021657931,0.0000011025408,0.000011816494,0.000008667248,0.6826119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986823,0.000045078774,0.00024181539,0.0002708036,0.0005700964,0.00018991096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987455,0.00038843413,0.00030597855,0.00021347086,0.0002898431,0.00005676433],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023156071,0.00020444662,0.00031710826,0.00008202993,0.0016262702,0.000030758063,0.0004893977,0.00022399586,0.000009420396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006708002,0.00018431955,0.00020937448,0.000017712298,0.0030182954,0.00008171235,0.00030012417,0.00023417974,0.000013195863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054466018,0.000008330549,0.00004376268,0.000013693097,0.00008768922,0.00007678863,0.0001086471,0.000010019246,5.5935385e-7,0.96092093,0.03848452,0.00019057539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021368745,0.000014956361,0.00012752037,0.00040983158,0.00010070334,0.000003760777,0.00011077408,0.0000038562416,0.0000050780386,0.0034455685,0.9953609,0.0002033282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046382635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030837939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95747536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021689087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086662866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254860617","doi":"","title":"Northern Ireland, the Belfast Agreement, and the British Constitution","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Ideology; Constitution; Legitimacy; Law; Northern ireland; Politics; Irish; Political science; Sociology; Ethnology; Democracy; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0076657608377248285,"score_gpt":0.2350175225863369,"score_spread":0.22735176174861207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254860617","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64537966,0.052607127,0.005352849,0.10026148,0.00089893,0.0006725568,0.0000063193484,0.00005393557,0.19476716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97708553,0.021546979,0.000003285007,0.00032823093,0.0005328845,0.000006737185,4.869942e-7,0.0000019618303,0.00049387955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985278,0.00011486208,0.00013467949,0.00009055643,0.00030263874,0.00082946266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996768,0.00006238587,0.00007873967,0.00004663696,0.000096136835,0.000039260114],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019106687,0.00006490062,0.000091873604,0.000011017022,0.0066253324,0.00027883146,0.0001880098,0.000032794505,0.000012971855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014922029,0.000038805534,0.00006441814,0.00012647375,0.0021167868,0.00011656502,0.00003358794,0.00061387353,0.000022913919],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019932982,0.000012576316,0.0026626198,2.5047393e-7,0.000075228236,0.0000023308376,0.0010088581,0.000017587676,0.0000014501614,0.9830673,0.000026381704,0.013105527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012187102,0.000032332475,0.0020394474,0.0000195475,0.000045832996,0.0002470297,0.013659859,7.015499e-7,8.470792e-7,0.954481,0.028178979,0.00007570464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0489838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6339682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58498436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004896404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002312987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254983969","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1445","title":"Of Pigeonholes and Principles: A Reconsideration of Discrimination Law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Common law; Law; Statutory law; Legislature; Action (physics); Prejudice (legal term); Quality (philosophy); Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.076643368074212,"score_gpt":0.28735525985051685,"score_spread":0.21071189177630484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254983969","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034784943,0.0012992969,0.0002025351,0.0026640806,0.00014868271,0.000075643,0.0000059320296,0.000008305141,0.9608106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986024,0.0007205212,0.0003995071,0.00006418305,0.00011513603,0.0000013892734,4.4528028e-7,0.0000020197115,0.000094435265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928087,0.00007957841,0.00022946882,0.00006592136,0.00024374909,0.00010038854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951106,0.00006720925,0.00016970094,0.00003402118,0.00017038047,0.0000476503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034796423,0.00004797803,0.000119888806,0.000023884757,0.00072998414,0.000033099263,0.000053928856,0.000037491674,0.00010901034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009528465,0.000041426447,0.000039363895,0.000053029245,0.000706925,0.00023430327,0.0000180091,0.000071082606,0.0000019693948],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004355877,0.00004126127,0.00094607944,0.0000058448823,0.000017038956,0.0000015455256,0.0030127077,0.00000852514,0.00016456463,0.99362975,0.00003809186,0.0021302148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006099422,0.00014783435,0.0056503704,0.00022723156,0.00008373628,0.000044257355,0.008663672,0.00009436365,0.0014522007,0.9643448,0.018485358,0.00019622206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030058542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27287188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9638174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024441992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023440087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9764004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255030594","doi":"","title":"How Supreme is the Supreme Law of the Land? A Comparative Analysis of the Influence of International Human Rights Conventions Upon the Interpretation of Constitutional Texts by Domestic Courts","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Human rights; Political science; Comparative law; Municipal law; International human rights law; Constitutional law; Public law; Common law; Treaty; Fundamental rights","score_opus":0.010169375326137079,"score_gpt":0.28631857072145916,"score_spread":0.27614919539532207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255030594","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98716027,0.0010157077,0.00079587783,0.0046898364,0.00015250799,0.00024995004,0.00012220444,0.000003667079,0.005809974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99961054,0.000085345666,0.000002968097,0.000043759683,0.000055781453,0.000006023943,0.000005726986,0.0000014277437,0.00018840967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980266,0.00033549828,0.00042834954,0.00010428757,0.00077545905,0.0003297695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820864,0.00029493816,0.0007138559,0.00013623698,0.000630219,0.000016122765],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009982742,0.000098218494,0.00024753215,0.00006331132,0.0011652997,0.000030069155,0.0006714762,0.000042630356,0.000028313723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007993723,0.000046231777,0.0003232714,0.00053373765,0.0041485266,0.00015450982,0.00006669864,0.00037948223,3.9804715e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023065972,0.000082934814,0.025508452,0.000001861988,0.0008929621,6.106133e-8,0.0013754105,0.0025125688,0.00070258335,0.96879023,0.000093879804,0.000015964246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061333587,0.00009233207,0.13587967,0.00014695528,0.0012707369,0.000012816462,0.0036212443,0.0004170942,0.0012957288,0.8530809,0.0034264664,0.00014268015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0114291925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.077815734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11570931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020819066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079129945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255984055","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3437","title":"The lure and the limits of dialogue","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Charter; Legislature; Political science; Law; Human rights; Sociology; Law and economics; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028836825296061897,"score_gpt":0.24361622916133863,"score_spread":0.21477940386527672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255984055","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032582168,0.011186512,0.000091431095,0.012395158,0.00039324735,0.000088826884,0.0000050859626,0.000005330729,0.94325227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971254,0.0024546946,0.000036739333,0.000026120088,0.00010015729,1.2705672e-8,5.8248144e-8,4.203527e-7,0.00025641473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995661,0.000111227215,0.00004699225,0.000026258474,0.00018315513,0.00006628351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955976,0.00012238884,0.00007406764,0.000028253702,0.00016661223,0.000048906277],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057932263,0.000022924803,0.00006755354,0.0000020882417,0.0014448783,0.000011979384,0.0001564946,0.000018560515,0.000019066958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000080689366,0.000013481304,0.000037481324,0.000013608668,0.0020481423,0.00011899046,0.000035882902,0.000044215496,6.953262e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088612906,0.0000066211273,0.0006566147,3.4516222e-7,0.000033302997,0.0000015423261,0.012750215,0.0000017848665,0.0000014580379,0.98292667,0.0016430181,0.0018898275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010980262,0.00004693635,0.004663474,0.000017163924,0.000055193334,0.0000048712263,0.12353906,0.000003579062,0.00000393353,0.050089017,0.8204306,0.00004817191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22319661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5488094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9645432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053475283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009554081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256235904","doi":"10.1017/s0020589315000275","title":"FOREIGN FADS OR FASHIONS? THE ROLE OF COMPARATIVISM IN HUMAN RIGHTS LAW","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Dignity; Political science; Comparative law; Law; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; International human rights law; Common law; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.09201827566361949,"score_gpt":0.3557104540449946,"score_spread":0.2636921783813751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256235904","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42356467,0.0001245419,0.000039296578,0.00060399825,0.00010579866,0.00013568623,0.000012763467,0.000012165256,0.57540107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99924797,0.00000164661,0.00003171306,0.00013310093,0.0001505669,0.000030052712,0.000005721296,0.0000013487269,0.00039785707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901265,0.0001404693,0.00022667265,0.00013591466,0.00035175742,0.0001325215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994545,0.00014336247,0.00008363695,0.00005554207,0.00020615471,0.00005680685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022704701,0.00009190777,0.00018766831,0.000029718864,0.0005095569,0.000058765538,0.00022905241,0.000031587595,0.000045088727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003444318,0.00005697064,0.000035747256,0.000104438965,0.0012618203,0.00022334716,0.000023512866,0.000088853565,0.000015020613],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000388806,0.00007893091,0.0019441218,4.1170924e-7,0.000036382888,0.0000020663642,0.021647094,0.000005881857,0.000032157954,0.97591174,0.00017192507,0.00013040166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041883416,0.00019981063,0.0031992213,0.00002432598,0.0000066257358,0.0000019800427,0.025147848,0.00007247819,0.0001052083,0.82275677,0.14796591,0.000100985395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054686572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25231934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57568336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045106495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045472338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95160836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256301177","doi":"","title":"Royal Assent – The Business of Parliament or the Executive?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Law; Political science; Government (linguistics); Queen (butterfly); Convention; Advice (programming); Politics","score_opus":0.03457432276344833,"score_gpt":0.29769657075063055,"score_spread":0.2631222479871822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256301177","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35385224,0.03579454,0.007409523,0.26836902,0.0039385282,0.0011745541,0.000010055559,0.00008219768,0.32936934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923681,0.0028664272,0.0000054168745,0.00014737023,0.0006494955,0.000006313033,1.7826638e-7,0.0000028733732,0.003953823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821985,0.00019258162,0.00015838811,0.000070376926,0.0005364888,0.0008223349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993335,0.00011022885,0.00012273881,0.0000681055,0.00031694619,0.000048489663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027379005,0.000067527675,0.00010383267,0.000015473643,0.00094564876,0.00004121439,0.00033995567,0.000027432177,0.000022792097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032337688,0.00002618429,0.00005639734,0.00024563758,0.0006055105,0.000056635366,0.000047319838,0.00044261193,0.000012142574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078956866,0.000052352847,0.002055654,5.398643e-7,0.00013411342,0.0000018674402,0.0032073094,0.000068944115,0.0000034799036,0.982097,0.0034691603,0.008830612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040045413,0.00014027742,0.0044997656,0.00002003422,0.000066373024,0.000036030862,0.11593826,0.000006875817,0.0000113002425,0.5676902,0.31107962,0.00011078564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007785115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033703033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6385159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005071265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006111666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99952275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256453488","doi":"","title":"Private Law as Constitutional Context for Same-Sex Marriage","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional law; Family law; Law; Private law; Public law; Comparative law; Constitutionalism; Charter; Political science; Context (archaeology); Common law; Marriage law; Reciprocal; Sociology; Politics; Democracy; Geography","score_opus":0.02377560016572354,"score_gpt":0.28656621994722653,"score_spread":0.262790619781503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256453488","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23323362,0.019472178,0.050170414,0.021607075,0.0028441653,0.0014715822,0.00007009499,0.00026276126,0.6708681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891045,0.0046147625,0.00011207319,0.0011284756,0.0012129965,0.000020655896,0.0000038389935,0.0000058446362,0.0037968515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99747705,0.000084528554,0.00023557547,0.00017082125,0.00042818388,0.0016038264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937546,0.00014597189,0.00011182709,0.000060179274,0.0001858125,0.00012072642],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001187913,0.00012389343,0.00019389718,0.00004307271,0.003844243,0.00004302438,0.00024486057,0.00008080923,0.00011060673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022820648,0.00011219015,0.00016560558,0.00012481923,0.002676764,0.00022287159,0.000029037707,0.00058543053,0.000103520906],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005218594,0.000038812374,0.0009457315,7.903703e-7,0.000116880714,0.000007127378,0.00058421306,0.000004579189,0.000026951702,0.9953165,0.00050290633,0.0024032998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005005113,0.000093017756,0.00007989643,0.000008543857,0.000017464314,0.00018197093,0.003109995,0.0000013082979,0.000026725605,0.67507637,0.32078168,0.00012254136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003064732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012228144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7558709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008019005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005883199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256778224","doi":"","title":"A Final Letter","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Duty; Invocation; Law and economics; Political science; Economic Justice; Politics; Law; Process (computing); Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.015217968239784482,"score_gpt":0.27781354417748166,"score_spread":0.26259557593769717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256778224","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69056726,0.0015004781,0.0017540758,0.054633554,0.0022991544,0.00012288846,0.0000014803983,0.00007423941,0.24904688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931226,0.0008791213,0.000040073526,0.00069408305,0.0027276827,0.0000023792652,2.3736624e-7,0.000003205332,0.0025306589],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998196,0.00004054476,0.0000968066,0.0000802203,0.0002701047,0.001316297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99975115,0.000030423664,0.000043851574,0.0000413132,0.0000726287,0.000060628317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011996725,0.000056964058,0.000070512964,0.000034256376,0.0011835404,0.00005045512,0.00018349163,0.000049635066,0.0001760029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012668749,0.000047894508,0.000067482346,0.00010863519,0.00031223413,0.00012815553,0.000017819611,0.0014392011,0.00012838173],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066224266,0.000015308977,0.00236377,1.2255423e-7,0.000024960385,0.000002281129,0.0003271175,2.3962727e-7,0.00018746535,0.98440963,0.0009863344,0.011676144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011753748,0.000023995066,0.0010019245,0.0000018554807,0.000008258811,0.00003933206,0.0011896249,3.959543e-7,0.00000710931,0.65349805,0.34404567,0.00006623623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001738979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.064718455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34305933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018213398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002449867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.952348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256842593","doi":"10.21991/c9mm3w","title":"GOVERNING THE CANADIAN STATE: THE CONSTITUTION IN AN ERA OF GLOBALIZATION, NEO-LIBERALISM, POPULISM, DECENTRALIZATION AND JUDICIAL ACTIVISM","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Peasant; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Charter; Limited government; Liberalism; Politics","score_opus":0.03275263109901524,"score_gpt":0.2720643479479774,"score_spread":0.23931171684896216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256842593","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4194772,0.008303882,0.061389845,0.057208758,0.008679138,0.0064505874,0.0019123628,0.000517198,0.43606105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997357,0.00040238842,0.00020192146,0.0016783599,0.00015398706,0.000071598995,0.00009770305,0.00000735953,0.000029646502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968518,0.00036437972,0.00070354406,0.00046476402,0.0007625586,0.0008529644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828225,0.00017349186,0.0003191721,0.00027764324,0.00062821346,0.00031921949],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009918971,0.00031442323,0.00034192344,0.00017824375,0.0062209754,0.0001739459,0.0005149883,0.00022467606,0.00014790747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068445073,0.00024008685,0.000110967354,0.00094709947,0.018029468,0.0012318561,0.00012252625,0.0004237491,0.00002348794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058704918,0.000069773356,0.14909466,0.000004488466,0.00004281323,0.000010542004,0.0027640816,0.00044630206,0.000012358618,0.84586644,0.00049139874,0.0011384268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029903755,0.0001798761,0.24325651,0.00055594015,0.0002824876,0.00018432498,0.027457975,0.0009883121,0.00021053801,0.483459,0.23893763,0.0014970152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40965113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8140559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57787985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006548238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00607634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257517042","doi":"10.21991/c91h26","title":"APPOINTMENTS TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Remand (court procedure); Original jurisdiction; Majority opinion; Certiorari","score_opus":0.035827875122077656,"score_gpt":0.25622851208617875,"score_spread":0.2204006369641011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257517042","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009609344,0.0010099428,0.030942697,0.036422737,0.005117472,0.0015221797,0.00064683816,0.00014312087,0.91458565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959182,0.000055522785,0.00059638696,0.0025592365,0.00020898864,0.00010590484,0.000018475417,0.000005716375,0.00053156546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970681,0.00011070919,0.0005642658,0.00037825658,0.0010386982,0.00083993893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983624,0.00016759786,0.00018106954,0.0003025962,0.0006467297,0.00033959158],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059672265,0.00025802586,0.0003282754,0.00011736369,0.0034893404,0.000033252938,0.00068286096,0.00010862991,0.00065484905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00075582403,0.00020683518,0.00016309565,0.00060356874,0.007532881,0.0002988402,0.00023053058,0.000190102,0.00013076342],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057548186,0.00008560932,0.013316591,0.000003927457,0.000108073014,0.000012401475,0.000655551,0.000099268174,0.000020314115,0.9478134,0.037334584,0.0004927655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060028664,0.00006651537,0.005335982,0.00011678882,0.000076909986,0.00003288033,0.013032776,0.00001842041,0.00044061302,0.06290104,0.91690046,0.00047732185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41694096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71434516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9863089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004737151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008925596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257874793","doi":"","title":"Law's Ambition and the Reconstruction of Role Morality in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.00656176574190685,"score_gpt":0.22552995903192388,"score_spread":0.21896819329001704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257874793","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96471,0.0034288596,0.000029588193,0.0114894565,0.00009134822,0.000065427856,0.0000014599076,0.0000023589955,0.020181527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99642164,0.0032670833,0.0000076808365,0.00010856703,0.00016397465,0.0000015728269,1.5949024e-7,8.7554685e-7,0.000028454748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915785,0.000112511334,0.00012860139,0.00004542892,0.00015862967,0.0003969698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99981457,0.000038509133,0.000066850895,0.000020618878,0.00004091153,0.000018545055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011201834,0.00003157635,0.00007857199,0.000013019251,0.00036263422,0.000009644149,0.00005421212,0.000015436988,0.000009818925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037564034,0.00002264454,0.000019129779,0.00007849321,0.00037560545,0.00010730156,0.000008327417,0.0002934295,4.5549183e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002391327,0.0000041473354,0.00795613,2.5118024e-7,0.000012164791,1.1285332e-7,0.0003126191,0.000014478462,0.000006208937,0.96067166,0.000005954474,0.030992338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053406716,0.000012143852,0.0086220885,0.000010888486,0.000010557377,0.000030542844,0.0271041,0.000023592298,0.000020561389,0.9604916,0.003091099,0.000048767706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98240113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031711657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010655612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035871519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6363453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258241783","doi":"","title":"Enforcing Laws That Infringe Rights","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Legislation; Human rights; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Enforcement; Judicial review; Legislature; Reservation of rights; Right to property","score_opus":0.03632216239761038,"score_gpt":0.2928380810203902,"score_spread":0.25651591862277984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258241783","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2456547,0.009490117,0.0024759562,0.004854916,0.0013082993,0.00015881911,0.0000012679398,0.00010947332,0.7359465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99531347,0.0013449931,0.000025894955,0.000109396795,0.0010358223,0.000002481867,4.086983e-7,0.0000036246497,0.0021638875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977813,0.00008155161,0.0001227436,0.000095400836,0.0004723444,0.0014466777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995765,0.00003453114,0.000076727505,0.0000473683,0.00012053175,0.00014433531],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019211641,0.000079815196,0.00011274895,0.00004936199,0.0012524425,0.00007182651,0.00020929676,0.000050717015,0.000026743115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010814964,0.000064223714,0.000066314686,0.00014594018,0.00022177347,0.00029222085,0.0000335982,0.00064640545,0.000098926226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010793361,0.000011727745,0.003584571,2.1741481e-7,0.000041766438,0.0000032136495,0.0019822204,0.0000067878977,0.0000023199127,0.99104625,0.00036822644,0.0029419076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002088764,0.000045345816,0.00021872837,0.000008506156,0.0000127755075,0.00002750155,0.0095511135,0.0000015305137,0.000010844864,0.80968,0.1801449,0.00008990134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010488779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06677666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74965876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001100178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032691404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258359097","doi":"","title":"A Comment on Canadian Constitutionalism","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Democracy; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Multiculturalism; Human rights; Law; Constitutionalism; Glory; Normative; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015595924504402588,"score_gpt":0.27550848197179467,"score_spread":0.25991255746739206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258359097","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010557752,0.0027222997,0.00040276462,0.473719,0.0005119782,0.00014663719,0.000009029221,0.00003668391,0.51189387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98487115,0.0025268297,0.000025190457,0.010640014,0.0012037461,0.000004146179,0.0000014686132,0.000002856874,0.0007245743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978136,0.00007516719,0.00012433382,0.00009331086,0.0003293065,0.001564324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958986,0.000042293337,0.000041303032,0.000042930395,0.000087520064,0.00019607507],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011783256,0.000074509735,0.00008430912,0.00008580846,0.002115871,0.000047084002,0.00016921358,0.000046481287,0.00016773763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000094851166,0.0000671213,0.00006311255,0.00012272797,0.00035308822,0.000108039356,0.000009208447,0.000659035,0.0002828976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061036158,0.000021971999,0.0004844748,8.997301e-8,0.000041949465,0.0000022197148,0.00035040083,0.00002074417,6.48437e-7,0.9867419,0.004243198,0.008086298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013275884,0.00002923645,0.00014620967,0.00000644701,0.0000067708143,0.000017581688,0.0019049553,0.0000012470439,0.000001358001,0.31151864,0.68616885,0.000065923094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2197135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97431344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003573268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011146462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99918324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258518658","doi":"","title":"Developments in Constitutional Law: The 2004-2005 Term - A Court In Transition","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; Constitutional court; Victory; Preliminary ruling; Political science; High Court; Privilege (computing); Term (time); Section (typography); Compensation (psychology); Politics; Constitution; Business; Economic Justice; Psychology","score_opus":0.01205911939712264,"score_gpt":0.2704237513526435,"score_spread":0.2583646319555209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258518658","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4847614,0.022196148,0.005073271,0.12597457,0.0009450768,0.00095982186,0.000015693986,0.00007997776,0.35999405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99542063,0.0031004122,0.000041556097,0.00078409625,0.00043066658,0.000011640229,0.0000017259817,0.0000024088458,0.0002068325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997861,0.00012627713,0.00024663415,0.000113438015,0.0003744393,0.0012781832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99977005,0.00004890104,0.00005474333,0.000033639764,0.0000469416,0.00004574805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002069244,0.00008648763,0.000111676476,0.000076264376,0.0008694798,0.000036372592,0.00017054651,0.000057838417,0.00004366538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003650366,0.00006709946,0.000047304693,0.00020791663,0.0008884488,0.0002694277,0.000011937738,0.000809975,0.000039740484],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023071383,0.000063556734,0.0035704554,3.3069102e-7,0.000022379008,0.000004094629,0.0018115303,0.00015046804,0.000011352111,0.98916113,0.000065348075,0.0051162615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020263437,0.000051500032,0.020193659,0.000110289126,0.000024035582,0.00017397708,0.014641737,0.000020306643,0.000017017452,0.6566032,0.30575973,0.0003781585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027091992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3424473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5106593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021148447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049573597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8794143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258551930","doi":"","title":"Statutory Bills of Rights: You Read Words In, You Read Words Out, You Take Parliament's Clear Intention and You Shake It All About","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Parliament; Law; Political science; Bill of rights; Power (physics); Statutory interpretation; Style (visual arts); Human rights; Politics; History","score_opus":0.019700943518734203,"score_gpt":0.29167693482587514,"score_spread":0.27197599130714095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258551930","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9172984,0.02071816,0.0004903193,0.010026759,0.0008166117,0.00052915106,0.000029179188,0.00008689739,0.050004546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818767,0.013943488,0.0000419757,0.0002812003,0.00049342535,0.0000067006354,0.000007770228,0.000011500868,0.0033372461],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99609727,0.0002443203,0.00070061075,0.0003646302,0.00074784236,0.0018453398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990037,0.000044327335,0.00040278316,0.0001498657,0.000224624,0.00017467204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002743583,0.00025320385,0.00043044574,0.00022653902,0.00092387944,0.0001100633,0.0003497272,0.0001804615,0.00010600152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015023038,0.00021586003,0.00016879174,0.0003973548,0.0006972995,0.00046022524,0.000051682262,0.0012274471,0.000015745147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035180853,0.0005310795,0.027859181,0.000009417665,0.00041876207,0.000030097643,0.011529224,0.000012616434,0.00063690223,0.89521307,0.0007801458,0.062627696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017764553,0.0012204291,0.03629697,0.00037279967,0.00018289455,0.000037847105,0.031949792,0.0000075640014,0.000035307607,0.7834424,0.144069,0.00060853804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018369414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09591146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14328887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011368607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011677281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98816735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259161801","doi":"","title":"Australia's Federal Courts: Their Origins, Structures and Jurisdiction","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Federal court; Law; Political science; Federal jurisdiction","score_opus":0.016407602690471326,"score_gpt":0.29413263690399627,"score_spread":0.27772503421352496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259161801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9712398,0.0055125086,0.0007584001,0.010539284,0.00045608147,0.00011577401,0.0000032683076,0.000057231344,0.01131764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897623,0.008469599,0.000020189496,0.00017594176,0.0010128742,8.4463096e-7,8.972486e-7,0.0000025264221,0.00055482495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983665,0.00006824601,0.00013022129,0.0001151789,0.0002455043,0.0010743617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997279,0.000020988246,0.00006778034,0.00003414722,0.00006898873,0.00008016717],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065875554,0.000095958756,0.000114473856,0.000043068725,0.0016616455,0.00011659924,0.00010449694,0.0000624448,0.000029046574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033982335,0.000074415686,0.0000518912,0.00008961124,0.00021260651,0.00020157613,0.000008619093,0.0006424167,0.0000061584265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017988814,0.000013254501,0.002265374,2.5168595e-7,0.000041095074,0.0000014473502,0.0006731712,0.0000029173207,0.000043908873,0.9767012,0.00025263822,0.019986738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018922436,0.00012356468,0.011911233,0.000005960969,0.000013194507,0.00006158535,0.004536374,0.0000010082399,0.000013229574,0.93941593,0.043629933,0.00009875608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020641526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007293401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043377295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063561084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010432994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260176686","doi":"10.82308/28636","title":"Réflexion critique sur la méthode moderne d'interprétation","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Supreme court; Law; Statute; Criticism; Doctrine; Philosophy; Legislator; Epistemology; Political science; Legislation; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03335210635263822,"score_gpt":0.2849623662951908,"score_spread":0.2516102599425526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260176686","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2693236,0.002253882,0.000235799,0.0034482847,0.003437479,0.0004651918,0.00045960344,0.00031439608,0.7200618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98523897,0.0014785711,0.0011889786,0.0018735047,0.00042062387,0.00006924199,0.000023046277,0.000055557608,0.00965152],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944875,0.0020605836,0.0007050927,0.00085878966,0.00095461105,0.0009334084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99707943,0.0012880034,0.00028717972,0.0003345956,0.0005918103,0.00041898745],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027351181,0.000510998,0.0005793219,0.0001478463,0.0029315506,0.0001496267,0.0005518215,0.00058316265,0.00045000046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002692084,0.0005693873,0.00034727118,0.00066976016,0.0012503028,0.0016966948,0.0002663914,0.0009174912,0.0011318746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053118478,0.00020719017,0.00005291286,0.000044003464,0.00008031754,0.000018162036,0.000043431646,0.000116016075,0.0012043383,0.7894366,0.000043144617,0.20870079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040562658,0.00010761095,0.0004384397,0.00029326076,0.00009622948,0.000015464027,0.00020067365,0.0003138981,0.0014203213,0.5627225,0.4334889,0.0004970681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016669007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008800246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7159154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087162125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013837514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260391119","doi":"","title":"Democracy Vs. Rule of Law: Does the Court Really Control the Elected Legislature?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Supreme court; Legislation; Judicial review; Legislature; Constitution; Judicial independence","score_opus":0.006214508512688446,"score_gpt":0.2546600247890411,"score_spread":0.24844551627635264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260391119","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14607096,0.026851108,0.0025885012,0.5823977,0.0013586476,0.00090613763,0.000022011147,0.00011957799,0.23968533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893504,0.0063218493,0.000014631914,0.0013420341,0.0015768453,0.000006214661,5.5609286e-7,0.00000632138,0.0013811535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739563,0.0002971274,0.0002738667,0.00011660906,0.0005627586,0.0013540186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905956,0.00028614234,0.0002153652,0.00011524443,0.0002726266,0.00005106781],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025090005,0.00011536372,0.0001850336,0.000025415371,0.0027411967,0.00007155729,0.00054624595,0.000070025155,0.00005182182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022046226,0.00005303122,0.00014824135,0.00019597779,0.00094438554,0.00018692091,0.000026994996,0.0012078405,0.000018027491],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000671005,0.000034945428,0.0009087497,4.0447668e-7,0.00019226313,6.327454e-7,0.0011126366,0.000021074458,0.00010099677,0.99075884,0.00078830915,0.006014068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004740892,0.000074035175,0.002800359,0.000011619627,0.0000900149,0.0000341339,0.0027921589,0.000012281986,0.00003789364,0.7892417,0.20432436,0.000107366606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059202895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.121207826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8432794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040715584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026919101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261418248","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900003593","title":"Resituating the Judicialization of Politics: Bush v. Gore as a Global Trend","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Politics; Political science; Polity; Presidency; Supreme court; Law; Democracy","score_opus":0.03707364720469677,"score_gpt":0.3043663065438004,"score_spread":0.2672926593391037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261418248","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20649742,0.0120174475,0.00024619984,0.022188064,0.0012400046,0.00019855348,0.000070795526,0.00001328512,0.75752825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99826974,0.00022267214,0.000058380047,0.00071877264,0.00059531775,8.8173203e-7,3.3991194e-7,0.0000027910285,0.00013108044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987505,0.00012046236,0.00032849735,0.00007928154,0.000424931,0.0002962984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895096,0.00010223383,0.00026220366,0.000077106575,0.00031476474,0.00029276183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044590753,0.00007440985,0.0001608268,0.000042729305,0.001187978,0.00006334123,0.00036020335,0.000055778608,0.0002587677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000566013,0.000058997128,0.00008536254,0.00035178868,0.0013279865,0.00018878144,0.000012526623,0.000112268084,0.0000145495405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021887051,0.000007900737,0.0051685665,0.0000023029163,0.000025001274,0.000038623482,0.0056637186,0.000039685558,0.000004087497,0.98491526,0.0029822707,0.0011504134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050422736,0.0002546679,0.023159066,0.00061707763,0.00019967249,0.00012878253,0.013229917,0.000047654932,0.0000814852,0.41934162,0.54205143,0.00038441195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30376515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6226443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79177237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002536291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010117627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91370857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261444281","doi":"10.59962/9780774856010-003","title":"Reality Checks: Presuming Innocence and Proving Guilt in <i>Charter</i> Welfare Cases","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Presumption of innocence; Innocence; Presumption; Law; Neutrality; Political science; Welfare; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Welfare rights; Law and economics; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.03614795310173334,"score_gpt":0.2200564479644186,"score_spread":0.18390849486268523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261444281","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008822415,0.0014727444,0.0000031540708,0.00011760321,0.00009337734,0.00048157704,0.00042145443,0.000056214576,0.9885315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5924541,0.0051579447,0.00011662095,0.000045402103,0.0001321422,0.0000017080743,0.000014221832,0.00001586481,0.40206203],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987109,0.00005533682,0.00020968099,0.00039512222,0.0003780176,0.00025097968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992285,0.00007429932,0.00021043513,0.00017720416,0.00021495126,0.00009460567],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017924978,0.00011490726,0.00038153055,0.000040080988,0.00096722477,0.000077740086,0.00038610763,0.00024546383,0.000055483153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009344603,0.00026004843,0.000081541366,0.000015859134,0.0020667221,0.0001372394,0.00044690433,0.00024185867,8.064748e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033459647,0.00034589673,0.017474633,0.0013148424,0.00088366977,0.016933972,0.054201487,0.00000892366,0.000024754536,0.24282618,0.21207128,0.45357975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043826105,0.000038872113,0.0073107476,0.0011413448,0.00006754017,0.00005335358,0.0016517005,0.000001925906,6.679697e-7,0.0032562378,0.98562044,0.00041891253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8617233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88031274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77354914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012717045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024076967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261683698","doi":"","title":"The Modern Constitutional State: A Defence","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.026576567102528842,"score_gpt":0.29064047097933227,"score_spread":0.26406390387680345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261683698","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13303557,0.08260626,0.11604703,0.056018014,0.003961622,0.00061958976,0.00001599673,0.00022962906,0.6074663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906815,0.006238837,0.000020962552,0.00013766384,0.0004944478,0.0000056172357,4.0664878e-7,0.0000023932616,0.0024181253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975762,0.0001312505,0.00015362058,0.000097491255,0.00058969023,0.001451763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934566,0.00010263908,0.00007601421,0.000054066346,0.00028648358,0.0001351366],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028892555,0.000073692114,0.000079452366,0.000022673923,0.0026218505,0.00011317371,0.0002909374,0.00003120618,0.0000060670386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044638538,0.000049544848,0.00005995294,0.00015639196,0.0020132035,0.000183298,0.000035873814,0.00066478853,0.00007388524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025594698,0.000012738022,0.0013819926,9.3842495e-8,0.00004474083,0.0000020282573,0.0009359529,0.000051747804,0.000002171819,0.9862756,0.0005375304,0.0107298065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001753489,0.000034269604,0.000089324305,0.000003852935,0.000007997863,0.000051198527,0.006054536,0.000012894478,0.0000012395354,0.89773357,0.09576744,0.00006832731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011464143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01984418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.857646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010416746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014510428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262111829","doi":"","title":"What's the Issue?: Judicial Dispute Resolution in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law in context","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Economic Justice; Project commissioning; Function (biology); Political science; Law; Publishing; Resolution (logic); Sociology; Public relations; Computer science","score_opus":0.0212712727829017,"score_gpt":0.2739185031918245,"score_spread":0.2526472304089228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262111829","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31383333,0.009768637,0.0000105682675,0.20879547,0.0030291728,0.00050771027,0.00000942658,0.00002988824,0.4640158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930451,0.00051228434,0.0000053723616,0.005437373,0.00064627524,0.000018533672,8.3967245e-7,0.0000019872878,0.0003322521],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991063,0.00010519227,0.00015851717,0.00011617506,0.00026529486,0.00024854904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970084,0.00014161198,0.000030487128,0.0000635641,0.000031314416,0.000032151747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003201669,0.0000575162,0.00010199374,0.000012456422,0.0004404911,0.000049848484,0.00016322032,0.000031452077,0.00010309222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006965996,0.000045413668,0.000020325331,0.0001984024,0.0003695823,0.00029166756,0.000035345227,0.000115408526,0.000040379935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014280009,0.000016486767,0.0042048763,5.745276e-7,0.000004625447,0.0000075303565,0.0049769767,0.00007077569,0.000001918735,0.9484438,0.0040046573,0.038253505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001697681,0.0000042723573,0.014165749,0.00003479302,0.0000024901021,2.2313915e-7,0.017748386,0.000039381863,0.000006288821,0.009238341,0.95851254,0.000077765915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9545079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064563693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068263203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3387946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262468117","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Failure or Constitutional Odyssey? What can we learn from Canada and Switzerland","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cadmus - EUI Research Repository (European University Institute)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Constitutional law; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.07661533051830999,"score_gpt":0.2697765042388192,"score_spread":0.19316117372050923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262468117","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4507521,0.0013922974,0.00024979096,0.0024009873,0.002116307,0.00053868303,0.00017535697,0.00015044789,0.54222405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920403,0.0020726772,0.00014827495,0.00014766415,0.0006649506,0.0000019666684,0.00003421284,0.0000067473184,0.0048832493],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996239,0.00096673437,0.0002663348,0.0006326146,0.0012120031,0.00068329234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997953,0.0003475191,0.000105899104,0.00026181518,0.0006969614,0.00063480117],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076980586,0.0002429188,0.00027769426,0.00015337777,0.005869628,0.0002641871,0.0006411387,0.0001248338,0.00018087737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048482115,0.00023447843,0.00007586009,0.00052352494,0.019037256,0.0011112485,0.000424384,0.0006534819,0.000053291296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032799708,0.00011775255,0.015736304,0.00001608105,0.00024044173,0.0071287123,0.006304707,0.000016731281,0.0002316487,0.96119297,0.006157306,0.002529331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083370495,0.00006994859,0.01364737,0.00023878628,0.000058388912,0.00009110704,0.029081149,0.0000032017813,0.00013230636,0.001103971,0.95429516,0.00044490458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7847611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85492915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.960089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009889215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00838775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99723375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263238008","doi":"","title":"Equality Rights, Ratio Identification, and the Un/Predictable Judicial Path Not Taken: Quebec (Attorney General) v. A and R. v. Ibanescu","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Paragraph; Charter; Political science; Law; Jurisprudence; Identification (biology); Path (computing); Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Human rights; Computer science","score_opus":0.018525201337505463,"score_gpt":0.26042981437778356,"score_spread":0.2419046130402781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263238008","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6017672,0.0023695326,0.017180687,0.062353842,0.001455467,0.0013040259,0.000048333928,0.00030921647,0.31321168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934134,0.00023491464,0.000072337454,0.0011849836,0.00079187757,0.000034363242,0.000005286233,0.0000030077076,0.004259837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852294,0.00037050803,0.00026444063,0.00025611153,0.0003683385,0.00021765626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992809,0.00026318335,0.00009234615,0.00012560941,0.00014601358,0.000091914844],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017162575,0.000106692576,0.00019528446,0.00002175473,0.002489192,0.0001986701,0.00014027162,0.00006686972,0.00009969163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031472842,0.00006689638,0.000038538026,0.00015132801,0.0021203835,0.00021198169,0.00007057533,0.00007894383,0.000020124404],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024135974,0.000015924383,0.0017513708,0.0000022128345,0.0000243645,2.6094284e-7,0.0030635279,0.0000013077835,0.00007397781,0.9908327,0.0023869919,0.0018232443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017778926,0.000028513168,0.1011099,0.000019285046,0.00012744317,0.0000025322938,0.0028541523,0.0007074773,0.00033486643,0.4133811,0.47926056,0.00039625316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31041875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17632173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5774516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035196106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012022744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99880946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264634278","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1024","title":"Are Jurisprudential Debates Conceptual?: Some Lessons from Democratic Theory","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Democracy; Politics; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Institution; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.046577924553256045,"score_gpt":0.3219174592072489,"score_spread":0.27533953465399286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264634278","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08413014,0.027386805,0.0013294746,0.009901929,0.0052792253,0.0002447947,0.0000984112,0.00015433364,0.87147486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931101,0.00070263643,0.00017871341,0.0010580666,0.004721829,0.000006642852,0.0000027057029,0.000009700326,0.00020955902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980398,0.0004050135,0.0002571479,0.00013963929,0.0005355262,0.00062287494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891955,0.00029754965,0.00025905928,0.00008614044,0.000115954506,0.00032174343],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008686509,0.00014520396,0.00023653606,0.000029582037,0.0035915677,0.00015672219,0.00030442353,0.000108515786,0.00079614396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021228578,0.00012184247,0.00014837766,0.00008883479,0.001276057,0.0007484417,0.0000852465,0.00031829145,0.0002439703],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018724735,0.0000866517,0.0072969175,8.988484e-7,0.00009872384,0.000016422438,0.0026764197,0.0000037660466,0.000052912263,0.98759896,0.0011935817,0.00095604995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032632242,0.000014029463,0.012863072,0.00006662083,0.00011352044,0.000013945583,0.012723737,9.764402e-7,0.00015633767,0.9489543,0.024533037,0.00023409686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023430971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0755214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010393924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001019152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99770564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265388694","doi":"","title":"Improving the Judicial Review of Common-Law Argumentation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Normative; Rhetoric; Constructive; Epistemology; Legal practice; Political science; Sociology; Law; Dimension (graph theory); Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.02019405078621806,"score_gpt":0.29361998606120404,"score_spread":0.273425935274986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265388694","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22300278,0.5069154,0.003512002,0.04166999,0.0016835431,0.0010974639,0.00000884714,0.00008632822,0.22202364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82891774,0.16972102,0.000009216077,0.0008211811,0.0004226553,0.0000035989099,6.882015e-7,0.0000024238836,0.000101466234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984524,0.00015263072,0.00023204266,0.000066829336,0.00040501988,0.00069104775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953043,0.000067209534,0.00018957331,0.000050839273,0.00013181075,0.000030112371],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017824823,0.000058491063,0.00013769025,0.000016765282,0.0018697038,0.000009886218,0.00020045455,0.000024326479,0.000031065705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010590027,0.00004046982,0.00009289616,0.00017170387,0.0006293429,0.00012952807,0.000023045548,0.0004764661,0.000010738148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006102375,0.000022660179,0.00055759057,0.000009775443,0.0000406845,0.0000010351099,0.0005415394,6.026345e-7,0.00002581269,0.9906834,0.00022376698,0.007887024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038781686,0.00017926692,0.0013651979,0.0005139314,0.000121684454,0.00016322926,0.00821479,0.0000028223888,0.00007751417,0.9572689,0.03151853,0.0001863353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011082106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014999883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60591495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035027665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020579875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265481439","doi":"","title":"Money Bills and the Use of the Royal Recommendation in Canada: Practice Versus Principle?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Constitution; Law; Legislation; Appropriation; Political science; Principle of legality; House of Representatives; Legal tender; Context (archaeology); Scrutiny; Law and economics; Legislature; Parliament; Sociology; Economics; Politics; Currency; History","score_opus":0.031110706033444364,"score_gpt":0.2786483147056715,"score_spread":0.2475376086722271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265481439","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.778542,0.0017564741,0.00033161987,0.20868175,0.0010284623,0.00034745838,0.000007899455,0.0000061938354,0.009298181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953353,0.0041813436,0.0000070713754,0.00015647,0.000097740834,0.0000025094955,7.087846e-8,0.0000015823957,0.00021791653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880135,0.00031833525,0.0001398492,0.000059071586,0.00021896814,0.00046242392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988907,0.00082148047,0.00014037864,0.00004109776,0.00008475049,0.000021617343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014550139,0.000041845447,0.000073342635,0.000013044816,0.00045215237,0.000016668271,0.00011355906,0.000017409333,0.000011181128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017683641,0.000018199777,0.00002406427,0.000107224354,0.0002848253,0.00015962348,0.00003770011,0.0002825468,6.8618857e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032868612,0.0000129819755,0.012073846,2.9623308e-7,0.00007460071,3.8332578e-7,0.0005434505,0.000019731511,0.0000041103613,0.9552448,0.00017332051,0.031523842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007206706,0.00014685155,0.06985137,0.000094377996,0.00015554621,0.000027791279,0.02690295,0.0000606767,0.000033931832,0.2259872,0.6692424,0.00029023216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8971256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9943572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7292576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015848642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073113246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265527373","doi":"","title":"The Paradox of Judicial Deference","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Doctrine; Judicial deference; Supreme court; Legitimacy; Political science; Mistake; Law; Judicial review; Standard of review; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.010319892063752105,"score_gpt":0.2612454779054094,"score_spread":0.2509255858416573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265527373","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5589143,0.036688495,0.0036999776,0.013783857,0.0011318641,0.00024495088,0.0000041505746,0.000052756564,0.38547966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99158037,0.006903778,0.0000080176,0.000024761923,0.00077806663,0.000002092164,2.3497846e-7,0.0000022627512,0.0007004326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982402,0.00008959298,0.00018248122,0.00006464081,0.00035483623,0.0010682866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995791,0.000116585805,0.000114866896,0.000043758366,0.000120615965,0.000025094096],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014286472,0.000054320997,0.00008888952,0.000020864687,0.0018197664,0.000033363787,0.00023936389,0.000032636108,0.000010292701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000116679825,0.0000364831,0.00007467573,0.00016692394,0.00061489333,0.000067613044,0.000018753044,0.00043215652,0.000013832719],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013385734,0.000014947741,0.003915222,1.5124863e-7,0.00002292892,4.1382893e-7,0.00012271303,0.0000045779516,0.00001827596,0.98672324,0.00021026559,0.008953853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095087504,0.000037354323,0.004041202,0.000004823979,0.0000128583615,0.000007390197,0.0033454383,7.4058136e-7,0.000014060848,0.96016127,0.03223128,0.000048499027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011106296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0983711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43266606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026638698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025824748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265995899","doi":"","title":"The Justice of Access: Who Should Have Standing to Challenge the Constitutional Adequacy of Legal Aid?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Economic Justice; Constitutional right; Discretion; Public interest; Sociology","score_opus":0.06554079387765922,"score_gpt":0.3671508948911148,"score_spread":0.3016101010134556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265995899","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16035406,0.046574153,0.08714671,0.08266066,0.0024935727,0.0011107465,0.000038334438,0.000045894052,0.61957586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990403,0.008238877,0.000011787934,0.00015700162,0.00073338114,0.0000031276354,2.6484838e-7,0.0000033313465,0.0004492239],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99742264,0.000112936235,0.0003754806,0.000111597066,0.0007612462,0.0012160803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985907,0.0006925956,0.00022648969,0.00008616656,0.00032608677,0.00007793445],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051336014,0.00009795597,0.00016806813,0.00006229303,0.002472012,0.00006827019,0.0006105005,0.000053993033,0.00002450116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074084464,0.00005809745,0.00011347068,0.00028426183,0.0019320559,0.00023689981,0.00009151959,0.000750175,0.0000036988397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096178104,0.000027893993,0.0008987062,0.0000026398518,0.00010887813,0.0000013289524,0.0012593885,0.000052201856,0.000024496252,0.9923244,0.00016154189,0.005042318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006280121,0.00032875212,0.0027334306,0.000118479074,0.00024765256,0.000049151597,0.11289815,0.0000073433725,0.0001792942,0.6722773,0.21029091,0.00024153618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018743264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04582838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8300489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005572506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036420468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266086422","doi":"","title":"Canada as Constitutional Exporter: The Rise of the 'Canadian Model' of Constitutionalism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Charter; Political science; Constitutional economics; Declaration; Constitutional theory; Constitutional law; Law; Power (physics); Law and economics; Democracy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.014168810572163484,"score_gpt":0.2526520373107017,"score_spread":0.2384832267385382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266086422","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31328228,0.011744724,0.008397111,0.04396097,0.0023734292,0.0007367034,0.0001805005,0.00001895261,0.6193053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983846,0.0004974165,0.000016857584,0.0004400293,0.00021772321,0.0000017714805,6.957963e-7,0.0000020391044,0.000438875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976038,0.00008216422,0.00032846167,0.000090589725,0.0008316292,0.0010634034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999074,0.00011144473,0.00021829437,0.00009568671,0.00038212887,0.00011847806],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026603711,0.00008781482,0.00013525569,0.000048926788,0.0023392993,0.000015269688,0.00044457059,0.00005910066,0.000055280012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026088103,0.000054667824,0.00011458313,0.00025953312,0.0046247877,0.00008141718,0.000030414,0.00064545526,0.0000020996931],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001140695,0.00001196089,0.0047241054,6.1533495e-7,0.00008239292,0.0000016550422,0.00024632798,0.00046678283,0.000021187983,0.9935069,0.00042823915,0.0004984134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029539134,0.000023922279,0.0023851097,0.000030662624,0.00006242836,0.000107832464,0.0065537747,0.000035966797,0.00011757254,0.90187335,0.088374965,0.00013900577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9782728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99944705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68510234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001876015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12959369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99895954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266174008","doi":"","title":"Role of the Media and Public Perceptions, The Proceedings of the Canada-United States Law Institute Conference on Multiple Actors in Canada-U.S. Relations: The Role of the Media and Public Perceptions: Introduction","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada-United States law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Media coverage; Media relations; Media studies; Sociology; Public administration","score_opus":0.015672258813934196,"score_gpt":0.2143093761541981,"score_spread":0.1986371173402639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266174008","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9143523,0.0005443861,9.983938e-7,0.08295857,0.00043137162,0.000396829,0.0003187308,0.000005480767,0.0009913272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99780345,0.0010464517,0.000008992918,0.0009107421,0.00016205353,0.000019727346,0.000027002883,0.000008865246,0.000012689537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974127,0.0002785736,0.00054836035,0.00019507746,0.0011569663,0.00040832968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99755955,0.00051958323,0.00048447252,0.00022150006,0.0010476818,0.00016723355],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062783586,0.00019822999,0.00024169177,0.0001039361,0.0035899444,0.00012606896,0.00082193536,0.00006982214,0.00004607425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017014842,0.000097739474,0.000055589593,0.0014091711,0.003117826,0.00035846586,0.00017773022,0.0007009095,9.3675105e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000346774,0.000074978394,0.17921333,0.000014023668,0.00016008005,0.0000010151235,0.025204636,0.0020299868,0.0003167975,0.78878844,0.0034617838,0.0007002328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006125934,0.000028580125,0.3697556,0.0001954333,0.0001004198,0.00002713387,0.47021392,0.00036479472,0.00013218039,0.04915381,0.10915591,0.00025964077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9993945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99998873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73963463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012674329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007814313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267311004","doi":"","title":"Book Review of 'Interpreting Constitutions: A Comparative Study'","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Terminology; Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Comparative law; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025754087873389956,"score_gpt":0.35510309340604823,"score_spread":0.3293490055326583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267311004","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032897992,0.86220044,0.001107911,0.009828632,0.00016497033,0.00044386086,0.0000019131442,0.000028812563,0.12293367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7999166,0.19692732,0.000010806905,0.0025993944,0.00013816443,0.0000035548321,3.431379e-7,0.0000011233482,0.00040265877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820405,0.00022410267,0.00031157385,0.00010315611,0.0003583661,0.0007987441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994018,0.00006762589,0.00018644988,0.0000551179,0.00023917678,0.000049826984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018907356,0.00008333502,0.00025819486,0.000045335128,0.0008205412,0.000017244454,0.00019335817,0.000022823366,0.00013293381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002535034,0.00006985476,0.00010376336,0.00022888661,0.0003874735,0.00017408274,0.00001543047,0.0005415059,0.000017235276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018390147,0.00018327219,0.0004843036,0.000008217012,0.00012255716,0.0000024862288,0.0024298423,0.0000018561411,0.000007428549,0.98672235,0.006854158,0.0031651536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008435516,0.0013696734,0.0010338197,0.0038348667,0.00025671124,0.00009648252,0.080096826,0.0000029714406,0.00001547102,0.43913156,0.47293046,0.00038759317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038890704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001135297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7966268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043843768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030202284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6311022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267705183","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511511042.007","title":"Constitutions, Judicial Review, Moral Rights, and Democracy: Disentangling the Issues","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Democracy; Law and economics; Judicial review; Law; Human rights; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03743009855371055,"score_gpt":0.2509015105689267,"score_spread":0.21347141201521613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267705183","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000038286194,0.03360253,0.000014506112,0.0013562022,0.00035353051,0.00054812385,0.00016343924,0.000092364266,0.963831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0041750753,0.077175036,0.000024369481,0.00045578365,0.0007695448,0.000001509965,0.00002198435,0.00000984871,0.91736686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986914,0.00009156958,0.000184873,0.00033996828,0.00042509715,0.0002671379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991824,0.000116110925,0.00017084637,0.00019309956,0.0002026605,0.00013486571],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017368863,0.00025056876,0.0003908733,0.000055789522,0.004120981,0.000039531296,0.00035192096,0.00017890219,0.00000950884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042207408,0.00021526507,0.00016679097,0.000017089267,0.004870228,0.00010538576,0.00026441083,0.00034132865,0.00001606021],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012687719,0.000004058133,0.000022870641,0.000022426628,0.00008610466,0.00013473844,0.00018438473,1.3162617e-7,1.3945143e-7,0.8445063,0.15463111,0.00039504477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013884933,0.000009624963,0.000022898957,0.0006436688,0.0003280583,0.000012610031,0.0001284206,0.0000012035176,0.000001992216,0.0010973136,0.99734354,0.00027181196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007429511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036367794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.843409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001648513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032411443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267901771","doi":"","title":"The End of Constitutional Exemptions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Sentence; Section (typography); Point (geometry); Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Computer science; History; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03085938485652937,"score_gpt":0.28053756514632855,"score_spread":0.24967818028979918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267901771","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.067831665,0.0026443133,0.00026017558,0.005612129,0.0008462552,0.00020319824,0.000042067466,0.00006984642,0.92249036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996704,0.0008098878,0.000111252724,0.00027746687,0.00040049953,0.000019266603,0.0000025481565,0.0000017600158,0.0016733593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990038,0.00007471444,0.000175716,0.00011303482,0.00041719797,0.00021552814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993548,0.00023235097,0.00005922815,0.000100977755,0.00015925546,0.00009343725],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000294502,0.00006541511,0.00010443363,0.000015147311,0.003877865,0.000021403626,0.00019803291,0.00004759168,0.00038631036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027011978,0.00004884093,0.00007995498,0.0001741136,0.010934214,0.00017039996,0.000044609496,0.000108024826,0.00022908827],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062848453,0.000025154088,0.0050171865,6.5336644e-7,0.000021062719,0.0000033355223,0.0002764229,0.000007036141,0.00003745829,0.99135584,0.0030436409,0.00020593319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014645838,0.000012494903,0.009931869,0.000012454429,0.000010475058,0.000004853746,0.0007861949,6.665736e-7,0.00006748318,0.07820327,0.91073614,0.0000876181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009686814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011917228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9288723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005727828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005620684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99741894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268096797","doi":"","title":"Understanding Retroactivity: When the Past Just Ain't What It Used to Be","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Statute; Legislature; Confusion; Political science; Temporality; Law; Statute of limitations; Adjudication; Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10643813424059254,"score_gpt":0.3054111160437165,"score_spread":0.19897298180312398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268096797","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14823623,0.0056440164,0.046979282,0.67239773,0.0017209877,0.00056953356,0.0000052516193,0.000112971895,0.12433402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993339,0.0019461924,0.000014099587,0.0010853513,0.0017054548,0.0000055921723,7.729079e-7,0.0000076271363,0.0018958792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972248,0.00017911104,0.00017868112,0.00015685911,0.00061776664,0.0016427604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995194,0.00015246481,0.00009568408,0.000081660844,0.00007433804,0.000076461096],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022386154,0.00011446676,0.00014411444,0.00006518429,0.0029751277,0.00038703394,0.0002951651,0.000058620823,0.00005530444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008695054,0.00008278787,0.00010542441,0.0002988834,0.00032921587,0.0005048961,0.0000476074,0.00081269676,0.000028019736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018933888,0.000026104617,0.002223716,4.4482923e-7,0.000065317276,0.000002516128,0.003362825,0.000020579897,0.000028145032,0.9890581,0.0039340192,0.0012593031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018312714,0.00006948294,0.00058665866,0.000020431513,0.000039062284,0.000018378967,0.1446174,0.0000019079205,0.00000498407,0.76721394,0.08710661,0.00013800814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00541804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20441109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8451028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002766771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016722108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99832284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268494103","doi":"","title":"The Rule of Law in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Constraint (computer-aided design); Law; Limiting; Rule of law; Political science; Order (exchange); Power (physics); Judicial review; Law and economics; Executive power; Constitutional law; Economics; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.008978439414927082,"score_gpt":0.2567097000052102,"score_spread":0.24773126059028314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268494103","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71867466,0.011137653,0.00019092446,0.007828295,0.0005274989,0.00008446107,0.0000013236338,0.000004366452,0.2615508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970064,0.0025441488,0.0000025331578,0.00010239861,0.00014958254,4.082783e-7,6.6971936e-8,0.0000011944088,0.00019324802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985434,0.00003440218,0.00014150169,0.000036430338,0.00026776484,0.0009765258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997189,0.00011915579,0.00005476049,0.000025383151,0.000052679185,0.000029089322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022049926,0.00003096233,0.000058015485,0.000012339342,0.0006880661,0.000008452533,0.00014795309,0.000013827458,0.0000056723984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006492223,0.000021322727,0.000023162776,0.000112914364,0.00021774611,0.000039757517,0.000011059337,0.00037387465,0.0000013693107],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009313103,0.00000439549,0.008399948,1.1803375e-7,0.000013401629,0.0000016170015,0.00028945704,0.000002377454,0.0000060731013,0.9834097,0.000021055752,0.007842552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013247477,0.00001802766,0.0102358125,0.000006745483,0.0000042865577,0.0000075483827,0.031057898,4.0907696e-7,0.000031610773,0.87546676,0.082986794,0.00005160531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9901152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27833176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017419927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011476988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99412704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268715355","doi":"","title":"Putting the Past Behind Us? Prospective Judicial and Legislative Constitutional Remedies","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Charter; Supreme court; Legislation; Law; Adjudication; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.013316321955796984,"score_gpt":0.2686208509659573,"score_spread":0.2553045290101603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268715355","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21931867,0.021474266,0.004772322,0.022199325,0.0015825279,0.0007674446,0.00001061241,0.000082647224,0.7297922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994736,0.0032167635,0.000066837405,0.00017262399,0.0012290544,0.000010441426,4.3413402e-7,0.000003769168,0.00056405977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768424,0.0002404735,0.00019363027,0.00017205343,0.0004639921,0.0012456191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993406,0.00018497679,0.00013446814,0.000044232813,0.0002262224,0.00006952468],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024388344,0.000121513505,0.00014896941,0.000045728328,0.004460955,0.00010399134,0.0001381291,0.000056847817,0.000028510178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000700341,0.00008537304,0.00006746354,0.00016495264,0.0034704362,0.00025126064,0.000031322397,0.00096768525,0.000011703054],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001046937,0.00001745802,0.056403566,3.8267598e-7,0.000118886026,0.0000022574698,0.0030306217,0.000004209031,0.000009338319,0.9385158,0.0000944466,0.0017925737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030115564,0.00006510556,0.011964655,0.000015403039,0.00004262233,0.00010907898,0.015519359,7.113881e-7,0.000005199639,0.926978,0.04489433,0.00010437464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001033077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021565467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7754173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006183729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037579623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99924153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268977263","doi":"","title":"Resource Questions in Social and Economic Rights Enforcement: A Preliminary View","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Judicial deference; Legislature; Political science; Deference; Judicial review; Government (linguistics); Principal (computer security); Law and economics; Politics; Separation of powers; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.024685912512057488,"score_gpt":0.29974564497178363,"score_spread":0.27505973245972615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268977263","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48042646,0.027994532,0.00035871708,0.015591696,0.00044805298,0.00041046328,0.000005651086,0.000067684516,0.47469676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963942,0.002203821,0.00000899874,0.00006325551,0.0006905542,0.000006943519,8.4844083e-7,0.0000030047331,0.00062834297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853873,0.00013818122,0.0001687051,0.000106857675,0.00016562032,0.00088191073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99975616,0.000032901917,0.000066113644,0.000027437201,0.000033131222,0.00008427251],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00154231,0.00007220791,0.00012129587,0.00006706503,0.001206608,0.000044057324,0.000114639624,0.000050970844,0.000018696408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000426904,0.00006586791,0.000035696707,0.000089703186,0.00027781425,0.00017185474,0.00003512171,0.00046700635,0.000024719468],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032721542,0.000017237428,0.0013093349,5.0993833e-7,0.000023527344,0.0000021136077,0.0027346818,0.0000115817875,3.3585474e-7,0.99181676,0.00031790155,0.003733284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003563664,0.00010830845,0.0009845978,0.000014717308,0.000014981862,0.000025845633,0.008018424,0.000007560064,4.2076346e-7,0.7723176,0.2180622,0.000088967725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013450224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09413157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5159678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013409511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002059129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9931193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269084978","doi":"10.22145/flr.31.2.2","title":"Burdened by Proof: How the Australian Refugee Review Tribunal has Failed Lesbian and Gay Asylum Seekers","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Refugee; Lesbian; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Political science; Project commissioning; Criminology; Refugee law; Sociology; Publishing; Gender studies; Medicine","score_opus":0.05716202341117506,"score_gpt":0.31529697470194257,"score_spread":0.2581349512907675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269084978","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013333547,0.67958635,0.000010942699,0.26210013,0.00020474606,0.0014262899,0.000026610243,0.000046345136,0.05646522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33842844,0.6287852,0.00010710215,0.023625933,0.0003032647,0.00036489812,0.000024640309,0.000016328228,0.008344184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782693,0.0006729295,0.0003056649,0.00031167603,0.00046073794,0.00042204108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999307,0.00008135273,0.00015410299,0.0001726185,0.0001256568,0.00015931402],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013853378,0.00020607613,0.000512262,0.000007686094,0.0025347474,0.00024010144,0.00023139863,0.00006869286,0.00031874006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049641775,0.00013300356,0.0001642952,0.00027708596,0.0011928917,0.00019657613,0.00003906004,0.00019686294,0.000052753374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038716908,0.00003155769,0.0002531247,0.0012599872,0.00007359845,0.000006721595,0.00010489208,3.9098367e-8,0.00000631569,0.6385813,0.35160726,0.008071348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012401876,0.000026812395,0.00006988372,0.004444306,0.00010542276,0.000005404171,0.00007388987,4.987493e-8,0.000010968322,0.0030913553,0.9918546,0.00019329101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023186004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004155695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64024734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008225316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020631556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269421503","doi":"","title":"Promotion of Federally Appointed Judges and Appointment of Chief Justices: The Unfinished Agenda","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Scrutiny; Political science; Supreme court; Transparency (behavior); Accountability; Politics; Constitution; Government (linguistics); Court of record; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.019756678315162236,"score_gpt":0.2852712489414722,"score_spread":0.26551457062630995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269421503","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89411414,0.0091551235,0.0022494718,0.03013238,0.00020476707,0.00045151584,0.000004461247,0.000028792547,0.06365938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947338,0.004839033,0.00003119072,0.00009150731,0.00015436536,0.0000017636189,7.2038307e-7,0.0000021343992,0.00014547714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863666,0.00012731207,0.00023816839,0.00009098973,0.0003141428,0.00059274497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995214,0.000052026862,0.00020958134,0.000049559574,0.00013522667,0.00003220191],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014487628,0.00007516869,0.00015266334,0.00003777705,0.0006785108,0.000026749174,0.00015209608,0.000036396355,0.000022256943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014186997,0.00004939806,0.00006553723,0.0001558588,0.00038390813,0.00009655326,0.000017823146,0.00033371287,0.0000013157099],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040713225,0.000106325366,0.00071073306,0.000003754642,0.00009606445,5.709457e-7,0.0022730937,0.0000058173805,0.00037538205,0.9625667,0.000054082808,0.03376677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005671795,0.00094232644,0.017989878,0.000055500157,0.00011518186,0.00003247102,0.023057062,0.000009412008,0.00021655498,0.9549819,0.0019097945,0.00012270128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006682601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047899336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.100619696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015396297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011506091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5218625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269697567","doi":"","title":"The Past, Present and Future of Fixed Election Dates in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Democracy; Political science; Public administration; General election; Parliament; Political economy; Law; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.0046840526646839496,"score_gpt":0.23167604349693566,"score_spread":0.22699199083225172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269697567","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9564793,0.0061101974,0.000013121632,0.031525604,0.0006778192,0.0000837889,0.0000014049717,0.0000032018752,0.0051055257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98888624,0.009428532,0.0000028965305,0.000020734617,0.0015438156,0.0000019969232,2.2893484e-7,0.0000014308737,0.0001141033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989806,0.000051305302,0.000108385546,0.000053707652,0.00020399975,0.0006020492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999751,0.0000694406,0.000060066268,0.000029985335,0.00005952872,0.000030026751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007482342,0.00004011182,0.000062124935,0.000016815608,0.0006805383,0.000018947412,0.00010572803,0.000023334129,0.0000067175592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002566986,0.000026524627,0.000015582427,0.000120202305,0.00015585446,0.000059686354,0.000014575273,0.00064271287,2.7892165e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002540478,0.000011911943,0.07176181,7.640647e-7,0.00004123541,9.020964e-7,0.00039082376,0.0000020592183,0.000171108,0.8365021,0.00068964885,0.09040228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029359295,0.00005812916,0.08506851,0.000006150319,0.00001540749,0.000032318996,0.036624,0.0000096068625,0.00006080749,0.47752577,0.40019196,0.000113745606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9014134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99881995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3995023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003460756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061378786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269767067","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1183","title":"The Constitutive Paradox of Modern Law: A Comment on Tully","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; Constitutionalism; Democracy; Constitutional law; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.04459802367941434,"score_gpt":0.28966889738774837,"score_spread":0.24507087370833402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269767067","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015962949,0.0012641406,0.00027486793,0.013168449,0.00039450428,0.000111724854,0.000009880456,0.000015221749,0.9831649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960264,0.0012939376,0.000089302506,0.002160786,0.000296736,0.0000055043283,4.0740426e-7,0.0000033156798,0.00012359585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862087,0.00016261834,0.00024664312,0.00010040334,0.00058625266,0.00028323257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918735,0.00026468709,0.00015368566,0.000085021784,0.00019562534,0.00011362865],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004922737,0.000095409116,0.0001684639,0.000014633574,0.0060899067,0.00004792885,0.00026318076,0.000046980185,0.000032236305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007326291,0.000063082414,0.00011664166,0.000075005075,0.0033205051,0.00010916879,0.00004144513,0.00023803567,0.000029203668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000515265,0.000075283126,0.00033130395,6.1650564e-7,0.000064222026,0.00003393292,0.0016472896,0.000052169093,0.000010665308,0.99486065,0.0016704133,0.0012019309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036432463,0.00009553444,0.00037760742,0.00004970108,0.000020328416,0.000053368916,0.001086571,0.000007702704,0.000100143705,0.77042645,0.2273097,0.000108583576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06155331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10729843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9944301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010048659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023089683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270138944","doi":"","title":"The Early Hours of the Post-World War II Model of Constitutional Federalism: The Warren Court and the World","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Legitimacy; Political science; Warren Court; Law; Human rights; Jurisprudence; Dignity; Politics","score_opus":0.01195748424761708,"score_gpt":0.2551943990108764,"score_spread":0.24323691476325934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270138944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45153543,0.032569207,0.00053571066,0.4371312,0.00066380657,0.000750414,0.000034922992,0.000023795918,0.07675552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909036,0.0045555336,0.00001166873,0.00049970765,0.00044914175,0.0000077261275,2.6739548e-7,0.0000036010256,0.0035687645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997819,0.00026804954,0.00031228416,0.000103221995,0.00067038694,0.00082702306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988411,0.00044856165,0.00027081752,0.00012390906,0.0002752457,0.00004036328],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003023455,0.000112917005,0.00017448532,0.0000341777,0.0059222397,0.000054928412,0.0006130198,0.00003218371,0.0000121078865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020988911,0.000045249064,0.00017865885,0.0002836239,0.007131305,0.00013762568,0.00012708052,0.00089295313,0.00000192104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085312466,0.000021591497,0.001604282,4.1007752e-7,0.00014618538,7.1056164e-8,0.0022071602,0.00039843973,0.0000134793745,0.9927854,0.00072711805,0.0020105415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011321531,0.00006232316,0.004286224,0.000049796847,0.00016655332,0.000032077718,0.010919003,0.0003102087,0.000053756303,0.9539269,0.028900422,0.00016057384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025995153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12405717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53936815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024388958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033884817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270175175","doi":"10.1089/elj.2013.0202","title":"Second-Best Deliberative Democracy and Election Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Ideal (ethics); Deliberative democracy; Redistricting; Political science; Law and economics; Democracy; Voting; Election law; Politics; Public administration; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.015450192314946978,"score_gpt":0.30134051025925157,"score_spread":0.2858903179443046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270175175","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42363787,0.0010339789,0.0001345418,0.018795924,0.00037133635,0.00018553303,0.000012947006,0.000042893702,0.555785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916283,0.0016248673,0.00009793383,0.0026909364,0.0022055085,0.0000075178814,0.0000013680549,0.000007127852,0.0017364225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894,0.000121504636,0.00020789934,0.00012998447,0.00019750575,0.00040309163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992008,0.000094452356,0.00009280828,0.000035828918,0.00030180236,0.0002743039],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001873943,0.00011909247,0.00014525246,0.00008491471,0.005619108,0.00041143748,0.00005283533,0.00008601435,0.00016957254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008535817,0.00010607316,0.00004427511,0.00015456328,0.00074295374,0.00052131526,0.000025794454,0.00025322425,0.000047926253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029987284,0.000020928672,0.00016646793,0.0000025248148,0.0000331997,0.0000010819502,0.0009862303,4.460031e-7,0.0001245861,0.99404323,0.00079570146,0.003822627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017510382,0.00011926589,0.0014733308,0.00001540373,0.00001843943,0.00012389549,0.0009973209,0.000009402414,0.00019517817,0.75214314,0.24459726,0.00013227938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1318179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03530599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5679905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016309119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020039677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99567544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270387197","doi":"","title":"The Role of Dissenting and Concurring Reasons in The Supreme Court of Canada's \"Charter\" Jurisprudence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Charter; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.008489126006916854,"score_gpt":0.24523691085189267,"score_spread":0.23674778484497583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270387197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9080365,0.0012192064,0.00015199783,0.0061954507,0.0002646187,0.00024711975,0.00004624952,0.0000083518025,0.08383053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99959356,0.00012428174,0.00006415137,0.00003961691,0.000114042,0.00001709025,0.0000018142791,0.0000013011233,0.000044126744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991497,0.000060981594,0.0002054919,0.0000961175,0.00032694516,0.00016077925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873626,0.0007975247,0.00011637463,0.00007058975,0.00024542978,0.000033818564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010481119,0.00005054358,0.00009635494,0.0000287052,0.00081492437,0.000022322794,0.00020653417,0.000039336875,0.000008674217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016176874,0.000040933814,0.00002762539,0.00019452527,0.0012313991,0.00007809857,0.000026084495,0.00014404475,3.6359063e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026174478,0.000014274413,0.054688968,0.000004296218,0.000008713251,0.000001349202,0.0013472692,0.000015311743,0.0006557813,0.94257975,0.00004115702,0.00064052886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061506144,0.000017065804,0.4939505,0.00037323282,0.00006826571,0.00007083473,0.03769789,0.0010999785,0.0009250634,0.36910382,0.095710814,0.0003674832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15395126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74953955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59558827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007214324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014549111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85168266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270517322","doi":"","title":"How Harper Will Reshape Canada's Courts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Political science; Separation of powers; Bill of rights; Constitution; Legislature; Judicial activism; Judicial review; Judicial independence; Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Constitutional law","score_opus":0.018648557120387016,"score_gpt":0.23027211674365544,"score_spread":0.21162355962326843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270517322","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2670176,0.028194679,0.0022343844,0.08261971,0.0034278699,0.00043544278,0.00001772665,0.0001410343,0.61591154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98985994,0.0038079633,0.000021715909,0.00035973408,0.0007166072,0.000002831359,4.5568186e-7,0.000005488627,0.005225236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758416,0.00007922868,0.000111493595,0.000117654425,0.00046941935,0.0016380537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995655,0.000025629217,0.00007951832,0.000055212582,0.00015692988,0.00011722517],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081680616,0.000090113295,0.00011638888,0.000031110732,0.0013290149,0.000051512,0.00024927867,0.00004625632,0.00011974831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014307303,0.00007626858,0.000057895002,0.00011247281,0.000257731,0.00024539712,0.000025016116,0.0006684784,0.000008130765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014139167,0.000016542714,0.0037771678,3.2292886e-7,0.000076456556,0.000010928015,0.0008022177,2.0308356e-7,0.0000069748653,0.98747134,0.0020391617,0.0057845237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016206627,0.000055128825,0.0032218199,0.000008850689,0.00002479643,0.00003929201,0.01214962,6.6405266e-7,0.00001179978,0.62969965,0.35447222,0.0001540666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72592515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98684007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7228424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012933249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013007319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271424998","doi":"","title":"Political Law and the Supreme Court of Canada (La Cour suprême du Canada et le droit politique)","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Politics; Constitutional law; Democracy; Constitutional court; Adjudication; Judicial review; Constitution","score_opus":0.007120024892550952,"score_gpt":0.22242000413556318,"score_spread":0.21529997924301222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271424998","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19823794,0.045513947,0.00013099844,0.45757067,0.0011078119,0.00022671599,0.00010638709,0.000010031917,0.2970955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98290133,0.012227011,0.0000040482932,0.002291139,0.00073413487,0.0000028838244,0.0000012715259,0.000008963585,0.0018292174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957996,0.0005271696,0.00036042824,0.00015692286,0.00077869475,0.0023771995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865496,0.0006040909,0.00014575744,0.000078759105,0.00025921199,0.00025723758],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018506517,0.00017167052,0.00034874704,0.000017848703,0.001860758,0.000027685914,0.00028131093,0.00008356448,0.00003098716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023764094,0.00013816629,0.00009165604,0.00015420315,0.0037124036,0.00014268336,0.000059307626,0.0011978027,6.097932e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042013427,0.000036332025,0.0017207485,0.000003936972,0.00020682224,0.000041235973,0.00042514515,0.0000056687213,0.0000010699389,0.99553454,0.001900939,0.00008156655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009769367,0.000056645844,0.0024771965,0.000030512305,0.00006745339,0.0016604706,0.013535278,0.000014854404,0.000009427717,0.83654726,0.14444286,0.00018108153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99982464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99995893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7846634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028967827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10623253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271604228","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900003994","title":"Constitutions as Living Trees: An Idiot Defends","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Idiot; Law; Sociology; Tree of life (biology); Political science; Philosophy; Law and economics; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.03350669052369158,"score_gpt":0.3190390909449404,"score_spread":0.2855324004212488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271604228","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23732069,0.0069193966,0.00046018118,0.010890499,0.0013344412,0.00014026577,0.000028439872,0.000033733264,0.74287236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99653906,0.00023081459,0.00038050918,0.0012597678,0.001284186,0.0000019562522,3.7422507e-7,0.0000047077133,0.00029862666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862486,0.00013196366,0.00031627223,0.00012936133,0.00037129127,0.00042623383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998293,0.00013851549,0.00015043379,0.000102710495,0.00035856536,0.0009567894],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007559397,0.00010661583,0.00019041661,0.00012009627,0.0020414703,0.00015612961,0.000447084,0.00008039993,0.0005889043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004942342,0.00010393701,0.00010693775,0.00024174695,0.0019626122,0.00079581066,0.000013599641,0.00022636319,0.00010813531],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029068783,0.000020701571,0.0039842296,9.3606815e-7,0.000025233603,0.000093402494,0.005511139,0.00014612445,0.000021111817,0.98640186,0.00095538504,0.0028369792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012192593,0.00010419419,0.005194677,0.0002128652,0.000051455812,0.00013437221,0.0037018938,0.000005415349,0.000029318511,0.013859871,0.9763597,0.0002242777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20227464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8837481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9754043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003860978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005254177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99925774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271825541","doi":"","title":"Book Review of Alex M. Cameron, Power Without Law: The Supreme Court of Canada, the Marshall Decisions, and the Failure of Judicial Activism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Jurisdiction; Political science; Nova scotia; Economic Justice; Treaty; Constitution; Sociology","score_opus":0.007106713470599838,"score_gpt":0.25263304126228103,"score_spread":0.24552632779168118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271825541","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.073318504,0.6727454,0.00013689537,0.21978165,0.00063165004,0.0009841658,0.000030089464,0.000008081538,0.032363575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89734185,0.100033954,0.0000051068555,0.002174188,0.0001573173,0.000004640129,2.4364388e-7,0.0000041205008,0.00027860395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979377,0.00028643545,0.00035043136,0.00009182151,0.00072430255,0.00060932076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985664,0.0005359436,0.00038786634,0.00014979066,0.00031777084,0.000042266292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038962956,0.000098034085,0.00029990618,0.000014632764,0.0009629337,0.000012757956,0.00048167308,0.000044693155,0.00011815378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006183077,0.000044142333,0.00010980593,0.00013678445,0.0022553036,0.00008102946,0.00006569638,0.00096205296,4.5072065e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000691043,0.00001951829,0.00052640395,0.000009470809,0.00019429358,3.767385e-7,0.0008346452,5.5324153e-7,0.000078255856,0.97610384,0.02084962,0.0013139332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008918683,0.00012686408,0.0040552607,0.0007296731,0.0003162821,0.000084498264,0.010891211,0.0000022523755,0.000093903785,0.31531096,0.667316,0.00018121245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27418602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90834117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8240233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010966949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00599076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271865752","doi":"","title":"Dialogic Judicial Review and its Critics","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Charter; Legislature; Political science; Law; Legitimacy; Judicial activism; Constitutional theory; Politics; Normative; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03237620147723794,"score_gpt":0.3005861337771629,"score_spread":0.26820993229992496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271865752","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061803687,0.8184388,0.00025981746,0.030179724,0.00051815243,0.0002964447,0.000004314691,0.00006420652,0.08843483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5689776,0.42936677,0.0000044282992,0.0007908484,0.0004873029,0.000002189113,2.5903248e-7,0.000002206684,0.00036841552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982135,0.00010663634,0.00016219875,0.00010448706,0.00028000455,0.0011331523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996305,0.00004887463,0.00005791123,0.000030393341,0.0001454901,0.00008679161],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010347136,0.00007869428,0.00017719285,0.00002908189,0.0019276399,0.00001531921,0.00012860072,0.00004251501,0.00004902075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043494892,0.00006760135,0.00005847741,0.00016265061,0.00034882192,0.00013817873,0.000027612354,0.00059809076,0.00003943706],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033297263,0.000018254697,0.00074617186,0.0000054858065,0.000036948753,0.000008416223,0.00032458824,1.3315693e-7,0.000004832513,0.9960726,0.00064124475,0.0021379807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023634052,0.00012454049,0.0015774178,0.00009595879,0.00013006356,0.00044276463,0.0014644557,5.8508186e-7,0.0000029421797,0.91553324,0.080186404,0.00020527736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00054022844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032625422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5071739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000281205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002346863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272172760","doi":"","title":"L’absurdité du critère scriptural pour qualifier la constitution (The Absurdity of the Scriptural Qualifier for a Constitution)","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Humanities; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03159265419223801,"score_gpt":0.29948979637269324,"score_spread":0.26789714218045524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272172760","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27014846,0.26308167,0.026674911,0.23422691,0.049240574,0.002949954,0.00048280376,0.00012278036,0.15307195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835414,0.005153335,0.00005366603,0.0010086129,0.0055212313,0.00003539443,0.000005406526,0.000011402203,0.0046695485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938194,0.0013318056,0.00077824283,0.00026486788,0.0008958728,0.0029097903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974836,0.00071151846,0.00063583325,0.00023188691,0.0007417282,0.00019543365],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007798902,0.00036415877,0.0004906263,0.000065178596,0.004198706,0.00012141872,0.0007150986,0.00028715786,0.00014007615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013592776,0.00022977515,0.0007316519,0.00052685034,0.0075228214,0.00090043107,0.00013387298,0.0018020418,0.000076334894],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008934082,0.00019416217,0.008793334,0.000018112341,0.00048247422,8.641125e-7,0.0025510902,0.000032486976,0.00010350162,0.9699309,0.010581428,0.0072223092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000943966,0.00008381061,0.0036868735,0.00015193308,0.0005101624,0.00049904734,0.0266534,0.000024946989,0.000080183825,0.33877265,0.62823147,0.00036153596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069984016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007128883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.713393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014867256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008315162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272781916","doi":"","title":"The Globalization of the Canadian Constitution","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Charter; Globalization; Globe; Political science; Scholarship; Politics; Identity (music); Immigration; Law; Sociology; Political economy","score_opus":0.011997891921283433,"score_gpt":0.26438846176483477,"score_spread":0.25239056984355135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272781916","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10437819,0.03433309,0.0014991636,0.041821234,0.0047940784,0.00044909128,0.000007967887,0.000026544647,0.8126906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99701303,0.002161968,0.0000017753956,0.000095992866,0.000421334,0.0000012967164,2.030641e-7,9.695758e-7,0.0003034235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984852,0.00011610327,0.00010132796,0.000030209789,0.00026111264,0.0010060541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966633,0.000032087744,0.000077176956,0.000042654443,0.00011725018,0.000064496286],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018502527,0.000036272402,0.00004188426,0.0000148370755,0.004169983,0.00003059553,0.0001843149,0.000033169206,0.000008100488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002568825,0.00002002131,0.000048141806,0.00019575766,0.00071752345,0.00011474023,0.0000126551995,0.00028044294,0.000008497597],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017506234,0.0000042291003,0.032835152,1.1071277e-7,0.000020864081,2.2467809e-8,0.00033555503,0.00000350911,0.0000025833037,0.9642518,0.00015723341,0.0023871476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008491534,0.000011217476,0.019477362,0.000008823609,0.00002590584,0.00001872573,0.007017023,0.0000011831547,0.000012385003,0.63570935,0.3375766,0.000056509074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31335455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9640785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89263487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013012048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008114276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2273248466","doi":"","title":"Judicial Independence, Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rule of law; Principle of legality; Law; Sketch; Statute; Political science; Declaration of independence; Economic Justice; Transitional justice; Independence (probability theory); Law and economics; Sociology; Constitution; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.029010018821396345,"score_gpt":0.3284590800815982,"score_spread":0.2994490612602018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2273248466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050781783,0.00089625776,0.00023306659,0.006987809,0.0001833263,0.00010265772,0.0000031256548,0.000012921385,0.94079906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987655,0.00014809596,0.00008484129,0.0005559523,0.000112479385,0.0000047560643,2.502174e-7,0.0000012350893,0.00032688142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939114,0.00010020439,0.000067931884,0.00006827921,0.00027041853,0.00010205718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996711,0.00017139986,0.000028013033,0.000031626983,0.00007007195,0.00002779304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045733294,0.00003825888,0.00008547439,0.000009583175,0.0006812586,0.000011473063,0.000054610595,0.00003381047,0.00012355286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013479473,0.00002722135,0.00002711353,0.00009020795,0.0018920039,0.00004440366,0.000009083906,0.0000617069,0.000008161918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020955413,0.000010633647,0.00008802334,0.0000021898152,0.0000098037535,6.523899e-7,0.0130782,0.0000027420858,0.000018843017,0.98657227,0.00010911693,0.00008655753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014721184,0.0000237043,0.003301874,0.000028886734,0.00022210322,0.0000050414715,0.042760994,0.0000051327293,0.00025361739,0.7309601,0.22078936,0.00017712169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01011401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002424871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94798374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010054045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011264687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2273294975","doi":"","title":"Legal Theory in the Crucible of Constitutional Justice","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Morality; Politics; Economic Justice; Constitutional economics; Democracy; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013544522028994293,"score_gpt":0.28510855892884446,"score_spread":0.27156403689985015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2273294975","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16952626,0.008013623,0.0012107381,0.0054429336,0.00027007042,0.00015256093,0.000004412452,0.000014303882,0.8153651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922001,0.0059596235,0.00001210758,0.0002804984,0.0004104472,0.0000033401877,4.5554975e-7,0.000001463966,0.0011319856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981946,0.00028914097,0.00018870698,0.00008025225,0.0003897892,0.0008575448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996088,0.00019520462,0.000054751068,0.00004960745,0.00006554948,0.000026077776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036638128,0.00006091861,0.000101504724,0.000044472483,0.0008418093,0.000028303168,0.0002799193,0.000038253034,0.00033819294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016474734,0.00004224544,0.000067917645,0.00026934285,0.0014301392,0.00016459094,0.000008343169,0.0006549477,0.000033776792],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004232878,0.00004797062,0.00054711656,7.6590595e-7,0.000026898097,0.0000034226161,0.0010445251,0.00004927662,0.0000057437474,0.988788,0.00008682573,0.009357096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022145869,0.00004458072,0.0009516756,0.0000134597085,0.000036418645,0.00007059963,0.018807055,0.000001312071,0.0000027456579,0.91526836,0.06452149,0.000060870563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019452876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008483912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8226738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025900436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004033351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7154991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274155596","doi":"","title":"Review of Sauvageau, Schneiderman, and Taras, The Last Word: Media Coverage of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Justice System Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.015418279786106137,"score_gpt":0.24550983402402304,"score_spread":0.2300915542379169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274155596","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.469762,0.33295015,0.00020382021,0.03859848,0.0067792195,0.0020817188,0.00016475981,0.00002052246,0.14943935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869271,0.012444802,0.000011262466,0.0003004848,0.00026337075,0.0000035694143,1.7017598e-7,0.0000022401493,0.000047033802],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848056,0.0002619357,0.00042175752,0.00005735985,0.0006306026,0.000147775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985064,0.00036444454,0.00046992913,0.00009191322,0.0005045216,0.000062786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009571922,0.0000662381,0.0002537979,0.000014376397,0.0005569296,0.0000147686,0.00026687735,0.000026958121,0.0000720197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007350039,0.000034409495,0.000058979793,0.00018042319,0.00044789512,0.00008438052,0.000056365985,0.00013696488,0.0000012894856],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047620328,0.00015125333,0.06440254,0.02623946,0.00095939665,0.000029228846,0.017881835,0.00016839079,0.0006942935,0.3406256,0.53620535,0.012595007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013125339,0.00009917711,0.5346017,0.06533676,0.0028848837,0.00033303993,0.1881605,0.00007102498,0.00024118091,0.004825592,0.20150024,0.0006333812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25056306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2827279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51716506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008104678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010122721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7544275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275434725","doi":"","title":"The Debate About Constitutional Dialogues in Canada: Unforeseen Implications?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial activism; Judicial review; Democracy; Political science; Government (linguistics); Affect (linguistics); Deliberative democracy; Law and economics; Law; Constitutional law; Public administration; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.01653969488856511,"score_gpt":0.2662626200544994,"score_spread":0.2497229251659343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2275434725","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27752075,0.062164422,0.0039056998,0.30049717,0.0017355448,0.00086874765,0.000037396905,0.00008981126,0.35318047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98452914,0.014441449,0.0000054447114,0.00042804313,0.00035305545,0.00000627488,0.0000019824813,0.0000014028241,0.00023322448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978418,0.000094477386,0.00022251661,0.000098673736,0.00033169737,0.0014108631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953413,0.000132244,0.000081456434,0.00005969889,0.00012134978,0.00007109175],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012285836,0.00007638503,0.00010064311,0.000034178385,0.0024300367,0.00006120855,0.00030651403,0.000029891404,0.000007877577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024222753,0.000054611977,0.00004457778,0.0002455628,0.0006539655,0.00013023417,0.000014753947,0.00061572343,0.000009154184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009811223,0.000008905599,0.018175572,8.0887745e-8,0.000019367924,0.0000014178652,0.00011472201,0.000021641281,0.0000026232256,0.96002257,0.00034822716,0.021275045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014297217,0.00001898036,0.09878681,0.00000707418,0.000005946989,0.00002648987,0.0024609372,0.0000020594646,0.0000011707208,0.84202904,0.056440588,0.00007792478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75804657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70700836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035855393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035886128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99886864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275579968","doi":"","title":"THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA IN THE AGE OF RIGHTS: CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRACY, THE RULE OF LAW AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS UNDER CANADA'S CONSTITUTION","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Judicial independence; Political science; Democracy; Fundamental rights; Separation of powers; Constitution; Human rights; Charter; Bill of rights; Judicial review; Politics","score_opus":0.010576516891939997,"score_gpt":0.24161362290316923,"score_spread":0.23103710601122923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2275579968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7438024,0.010586488,0.00036131084,0.03532199,0.00071069767,0.00053426827,0.000062033476,0.000005612394,0.20861515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985374,0.0010140373,0.000002976085,0.00024571334,0.000092195725,0.0000026480018,0.0000019711624,0.0000010375039,0.0001019983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798054,0.00020965765,0.00033590855,0.00008487639,0.0007167241,0.0006723237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914604,0.00039898694,0.00019693721,0.000074245865,0.0001498909,0.00003390555],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015607715,0.00008901296,0.00016158771,0.00001899179,0.0023747748,0.000020718553,0.00030785013,0.000033295593,0.000012637904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005094093,0.0000447482,0.00004384894,0.00016606413,0.0046935566,0.00008083487,0.0000263275,0.00043002065,1.1521928e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031670585,0.000024377534,0.002938186,9.853783e-7,0.00008292795,0.0000060436346,0.00036143864,0.000043867905,0.000022827848,0.99618286,0.00023832367,0.00006648574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039832765,0.000041010106,0.0057450403,0.000032832162,0.000041706335,0.00012949944,0.009541129,0.000003973561,0.000043641503,0.8520086,0.13192852,0.00008574701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99148697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99984396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25473496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088581396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016029157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W22768864","doi":"","title":"Parliamentary Privilege, Rule of Law and the Charter after the Vaid Case","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Privilege (computing); Political science; Common law; Legislature; Subject (documents); Rule of law; Supreme court; Public law; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.008280787281311298,"score_gpt":0.25913501508932796,"score_spread":0.25085422780801664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W22768864","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9277886,0.015033131,0.00041900942,0.013854363,0.00026507533,0.00021631525,0.0000033767446,0.00000949889,0.042410627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99543774,0.0030040957,0.0000057462544,0.00092742016,0.0004684371,0.0000046240325,1.1713947e-7,0.0000025891156,0.00014920036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986857,0.00010732449,0.0001547063,0.00006668921,0.00023085476,0.0007547149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963194,0.00015377233,0.000073638505,0.00005338932,0.000051718354,0.000035515415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003244451,0.00006004554,0.000094474475,0.000014659197,0.0011118406,0.000029513754,0.00011903618,0.000026245345,0.000035610956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026474527,0.000030117111,0.00006383609,0.00007242833,0.0013890208,0.000093511815,0.000033796576,0.00045297685,0.0000046192376],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001232522,0.000015794056,0.0015853473,5.779083e-7,0.00008383748,0.000024595864,0.0038013787,1.6018386e-7,0.0000051604993,0.98912686,0.000035505367,0.005197508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007550963,0.00006407819,0.0020109054,0.000014455309,0.00008213744,0.0011220081,0.045123402,0.0000010174401,0.000026250707,0.91308343,0.037619293,0.00009792953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010740513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12560399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11486348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013025633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035698607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99584705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278768245","doi":"","title":"Canadian Charter Equality at 20: Reflections from a Card-Carrying Member of the Court Party","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Redress; Democracy; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.034584069172632084,"score_gpt":0.30374695575761756,"score_spread":0.2691628865849855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278768245","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73432857,0.0042465096,0.00019245486,0.026093492,0.0011008395,0.00021075843,0.00008122506,0.000026651778,0.2337195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99546367,0.00042193918,0.000006627911,0.0001627912,0.00083351,0.0000044807825,0.0000027001643,0.000004399376,0.0030998527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979445,0.00018721732,0.00021058424,0.000117393894,0.00037214023,0.0011681931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995247,0.000050033996,0.00011854592,0.000088939676,0.00013376026,0.00008397818],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009949005,0.00008183972,0.00013600726,0.00003608475,0.0024100977,0.000029768045,0.00020481773,0.000064608816,0.00014248936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050599854,0.000059877246,0.00014319882,0.00021903428,0.00029211774,0.00008909289,0.000029796547,0.0005378526,0.000019826293],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000171698,0.000034774745,0.097983986,8.5705227e-7,0.00021692876,0.0000015662337,0.0022544074,0.000045584362,0.0005753449,0.8949608,0.003080595,0.00082796015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023780356,0.000022334485,0.024424907,0.000019655286,0.00008320225,0.000014756942,0.005690288,0.0000031412715,0.00009713709,0.71177024,0.25747648,0.00016004579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85871434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99662644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26113513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002792171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005170827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2281574189","doi":"","title":"The Last Word: Media Coverage of the Supreme Court of Canada (Florian Sauvageau David Schneiderman David Taras)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Philosophy; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.02516552826368531,"score_gpt":0.27815466520139986,"score_spread":0.2529891369377146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2281574189","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030348677,0.3620706,0.0000053547496,0.01142104,0.0026487946,0.0012767921,0.00025347978,0.000024953637,0.5919503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8335153,0.1657756,0.0000023660325,0.0004933918,0.00015200405,0.000011066306,0.000007065423,0.000003928898,0.00003927258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982149,0.000114060735,0.00050970895,0.00013952453,0.0007598221,0.00026199684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900764,0.00014027813,0.00033548224,0.00022121816,0.0002093807,0.000086027474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000638521,0.00013261888,0.0004050374,0.000008064543,0.0011148244,0.0000074087698,0.00038651118,0.000034162633,0.0000207874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000105235114,0.00006935936,0.00012430706,0.00022722354,0.002098086,0.000107367654,0.00012651001,0.0001460209,9.916249e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070523943,0.000031497086,0.0010171388,0.00046844973,0.000036688212,8.306765e-7,0.0005361225,2.5262304e-7,0.0000031342095,0.9908183,0.0019370877,0.0051434506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013825411,0.000013847796,0.0048825876,0.0020708556,0.000045360845,0.0000020395435,0.00018055679,2.7849683e-7,0.000050692015,0.0029215827,0.98960197,0.000091987196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38505468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83716106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98789674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098239136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000652706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8574441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282150466","doi":"","title":"Review of Barbara Babcock's, Woman Lawyer: The Trials of Clara Foltz","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Biography; Scholarship; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Law; Media studies; Political science; History","score_opus":0.028981118268730253,"score_gpt":0.33553574054792473,"score_spread":0.3065546222791945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282150466","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.106818475,0.71927404,0.00032071603,0.045322977,0.0018852401,0.00097257947,0.000022742055,0.00003787197,0.12534536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7518676,0.24683675,0.000016086771,0.000458799,0.0005949189,0.000005149105,5.52756e-7,0.0000036388294,0.00021651275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975323,0.00046880526,0.0006259952,0.00009324197,0.00045674198,0.0008229005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986731,0.0003524996,0.00053017755,0.00012207059,0.0002698636,0.000052319818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013950317,0.00008836283,0.00043379414,0.000035156398,0.0006096972,0.000014733621,0.000436623,0.00006524874,0.00019029237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021781807,0.000053558437,0.0003096416,0.00025305175,0.00064541853,0.000095379786,0.000036448717,0.0010401396,0.000009980067],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015276435,0.000031754556,0.0005334533,0.000027805554,0.00013362349,3.0223475e-7,0.00027926458,2.2463156e-7,0.0003005381,0.98707277,0.0018463113,0.009758693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033391168,0.00012430015,0.00063337473,0.0005919479,0.0001878443,0.00002840761,0.0026099896,3.689327e-7,0.00010629641,0.61935604,0.37590486,0.00012269696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002203181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012729672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6450491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010603491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034438595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71034557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282380463","doi":"10.1515/9780791485842-005","title":"Constitutional Rights Jurisprudence in Canada and the United States: Significant Convergence or Enduring Divergence?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"SUNY Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Divergence (linguistics); Jurisprudence; Convergence (economics); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.045946153916156265,"score_gpt":0.2583473403866452,"score_spread":0.21240118647048895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282380463","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019191584,0.0033473268,0.00005234606,0.00023717446,0.0012137371,0.00082616176,0.00026097707,0.0000383911,0.9921047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8841588,0.0051095104,0.000016795577,0.00034963392,0.0004506118,0.0000922009,0.000025309362,0.0000099981735,0.10978717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980536,0.000115953226,0.00036540773,0.0003136984,0.0007202751,0.00043103454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876076,0.00058823137,0.00018399055,0.0001458369,0.00015689267,0.00016431366],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042806854,0.00026232973,0.00036787865,0.000048648337,0.00106804,0.00004507149,0.0003673362,0.0001278732,0.000303459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006862143,0.00017202849,0.000054366043,0.000025566495,0.0059565124,0.00007333087,0.00020010266,0.00035279387,0.00000795049],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009210277,0.0000037302302,0.00047535513,0.0000130042135,0.0000682691,0.000054059634,0.0019444164,0.0000150010865,4.4859362e-7,0.9966199,0.00033853517,0.00037519765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040534415,0.000007020782,0.00022716816,0.00022241,0.000073561525,0.0000034549676,0.00040449115,0.000014527289,0.000015981263,0.062709674,0.9355507,0.00036564737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98094594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9352122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039218404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021287145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282628998","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1470709","title":"One Step Forward, One Step Back: Measuring Activism in the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ontario Institute of Technology; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Two step; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.041158884746170424,"score_gpt":0.24272818395330076,"score_spread":0.20156929920713035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282628998","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6978525,0.006538604,0.0030747647,0.009472451,0.00061024673,0.00056642335,0.000011628097,0.000018595969,0.2818548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976484,0.0016933545,0.000053369662,0.00009754384,0.00024194304,0.0000042183588,4.1328897e-7,0.0000049926502,0.00025572337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973329,0.0002075372,0.00024609422,0.00011213369,0.0007808441,0.0013205174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994937,0.000083368424,0.00014500674,0.00008135103,0.00013706843,0.000059460606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026095842,0.00008997988,0.00019483127,0.00004776972,0.0006138696,0.000018340512,0.00039498808,0.000045002267,0.00007117381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011970178,0.00007343085,0.000065082284,0.0002311004,0.00022188891,0.00015152605,0.000030848885,0.0007809624,0.000004139502],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011037706,0.00023671074,0.014290758,0.0000056825625,0.00034528013,0.000005508127,0.0058743497,0.000005951697,0.00010526266,0.965572,0.00035790907,0.013090215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017584912,0.00047965272,0.09419247,0.00022159897,0.00018041593,0.000048599788,0.14353633,0.000014461377,0.00035607733,0.7384865,0.020112488,0.00061290787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7663726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9887616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.299796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011459867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008476146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282645793","doi":"","title":"Does Constitutional Change Matter? Canada's Recognition of Aboriginal Title","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DigitalCommons - WayneState (Wayne State University)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitution; Law; Political science; Doctrine; Constitutional law; Constitutional right; Politics","score_opus":0.023970523885872074,"score_gpt":0.2379021798389892,"score_spread":0.21393165595311714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282645793","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05088253,0.000050700364,0.00008581305,0.0021013855,0.0003185456,0.00012862863,0.0007260898,0.00004080335,0.9456655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99396586,0.00032427814,0.000072270734,0.00013002226,0.00012482659,0.0000010649188,0.00005418848,0.0000031914676,0.0053243134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993265,0.000030503663,0.00010341859,0.00012498196,0.00021720222,0.00019735412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959844,0.000052701598,0.000065020875,0.00006314785,0.00013798577,0.00008272779],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000551947,0.00008288747,0.00011413421,0.000096859076,0.0002855589,0.000018799736,0.00012724986,0.000026844016,0.0005490069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001140049,0.0000716267,0.000042860407,0.00025828663,0.0008053382,0.00031308032,0.000028030894,0.00006099013,0.0002124114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080106336,0.00019148542,0.029906077,0.000030807372,0.00013973986,0.00013872495,0.001549808,0.000024358811,0.000016660922,0.8747418,0.026554994,0.06662547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013590696,0.000008044971,0.0024553847,0.000022785727,0.000013963931,9.214463e-7,0.0007029674,0.0000018655762,0.000043841883,0.0019122119,0.9945795,0.00012263522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19251703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42542657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9680245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021803992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006575444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8128601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2284045438","doi":"10.1080/0098261x.2009.10767931","title":"Review of Songer, The Transformation of the Supreme Court of Canada: An Empirical Examination","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Justice System Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Empirical examination; Political science; Law; Transformation (genetics); Economics; Actuarial science","score_opus":0.04209413976392959,"score_gpt":0.3052237155141118,"score_spread":0.26312957575018225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2284045438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7059796,0.05666993,0.003138565,0.05618127,0.004685285,0.0027221248,0.00007124685,0.000024595107,0.17052741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99792826,0.0017146214,0.000012890993,0.00014760716,0.00016866856,0.0000046784967,3.0813212e-7,0.0000013342288,0.000021651696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983645,0.00044841264,0.0004208493,0.000036613725,0.00062939664,0.000100199075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865854,0.00012860655,0.00038289465,0.00006534829,0.00072571763,0.000038912356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016476657,0.000043675165,0.00015892234,0.000014449743,0.0004909326,0.000009318117,0.0002143016,0.000025928584,0.00004062865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029389546,0.00002248722,0.00005802018,0.00017778517,0.00021065904,0.0001697682,0.000009897646,0.000086919776,7.0739964e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058044716,0.00050991785,0.014921697,0.035254963,0.00065831555,0.00000442902,0.14771555,0.00051611697,0.0015971295,0.59863746,0.13790268,0.062223673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082318456,0.00023397499,0.42836112,0.025445005,0.0021280097,0.00011667614,0.4963345,0.0009929704,0.00056580774,0.002241049,0.042368487,0.00038924193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13542001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10520134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59639645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014359478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009787458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91112643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2284485176","doi":"","title":"Arguing for Principles in Different Legal Cultures","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Political science; Legal certainty; Economic Justice; Legal realism; Law and economics; Legal culture; Certainty; Sociology; Legal research; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04111822668045917,"score_gpt":0.28379124859116606,"score_spread":0.2426730219107069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2284485176","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96360075,0.00023140757,0.00007484097,0.005704629,0.00012701652,0.00029634387,0.000020762127,0.000044254662,0.029900016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99728423,0.00007405426,0.0003709711,0.00013234708,0.00015441667,6.272717e-7,0.000007808143,0.0000034344828,0.001972134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878395,0.00010119408,0.00013829434,0.00025661013,0.0003669234,0.00035300635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994535,0.000101024205,0.00010497662,0.00010727502,0.00012491766,0.00010830141],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045808495,0.00012750662,0.00025484493,0.0001278929,0.0011863671,0.000031853204,0.00037408073,0.00013367365,0.00007993501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022724456,0.00013405617,0.00016317103,0.00025943687,0.0003814314,0.00045007176,0.00008066116,0.00017374812,0.000013703364],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058991933,0.000451054,0.26343116,0.000026718213,0.00009459846,0.000040565177,0.02078185,0.00007322492,0.0038268352,0.70369434,0.0007402782,0.006249438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010557682,0.00011061123,0.87928617,0.000100335696,0.0000413471,0.0000010523297,0.0094819795,0.00000894443,0.00030937453,0.020318314,0.08900891,0.00027717862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013204314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014863119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.683376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002097685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011079593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9124696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2284616397","doi":"","title":"Book Review - Courts and Federalism: Judicial Doctrine in the United States, Australia, and Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Berkley Law Scholarship Repository (University of California, Berkeley)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Judicial review; Law; Doctrine; Politics","score_opus":0.019187953659383302,"score_gpt":0.2548938742137268,"score_spread":0.23570592055434347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2284616397","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9379172,0.036597997,0.00001891637,0.010453041,0.00017941136,0.00056135096,0.000065660475,0.000030740215,0.0141757205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9813442,0.0105414875,0.000048272563,0.00724693,0.00011372698,8.8563087e-7,0.000027254795,0.0000055401183,0.000671668],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982299,0.00034108126,0.00023591654,0.0002429163,0.00060229143,0.00034787634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990801,0.00027244707,0.0001557293,0.0001268548,0.00018871749,0.00017612598],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001449248,0.00014154174,0.00027916918,0.000058713456,0.0016444932,0.000052524352,0.00026177114,0.000097092445,0.00005491753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008006653,0.00013842476,0.000047791404,0.00027269186,0.0010480986,0.00028179944,0.00008318283,0.00030430537,0.0000025456168],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062462507,0.00040979675,0.33112627,0.0008999099,0.0004736098,0.00313512,0.009431153,0.000020930614,0.00016170557,0.44692776,0.2046808,0.0021083422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034759723,0.000029107905,0.061263278,0.0003301905,0.00009840886,0.000025245085,0.0015718711,9.582017e-7,0.000017304716,0.0013671166,0.934756,0.00019295137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95305896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9355411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7300752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019041788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030091923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2285482189","doi":"","title":"Courts as Facilitators of Intergovernmental Dialogue: Cooperative Federalism and Judicial Review","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Federalism; Supreme court; Political science; Facilitator; Scrutiny; Law; Skepticism; Incrementalism; Politics; Judicial review; Law and economics; Constitution; Sociology","score_opus":0.010702657601952374,"score_gpt":0.2813735875963997,"score_spread":0.2706709299944473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2285482189","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7670011,0.13721228,0.0011426772,0.040320646,0.000948976,0.00058631576,0.00006219575,0.000041362404,0.052684464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8369849,0.16196953,0.0000032046219,0.00031707424,0.00019784475,0.0000037797504,3.4152833e-7,0.0000028168765,0.0005205462],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983739,0.00015993399,0.00022543437,0.0001189893,0.0003952563,0.0007264554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955076,0.00009679357,0.000121863304,0.00003654601,0.000119202625,0.000074816606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001116076,0.00009149453,0.00020995554,0.000022694272,0.000613775,0.000016415852,0.00012100363,0.00003747251,0.00009501347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043328071,0.00005952094,0.000069901595,0.00007503236,0.00068201043,0.00017791828,0.00004301966,0.00025147217,0.000019363086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003456567,0.000022031005,0.001555717,0.0000051222714,0.00011779656,0.000002198692,0.0007497298,3.8071125e-8,0.00014731742,0.9678754,0.00064869324,0.028841397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009955104,0.0006407166,0.0017997322,0.0010408398,0.00010403068,0.00009969081,0.011300575,1.3423316e-7,0.00013503092,0.9134505,0.0701233,0.00030997352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022055623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008634348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06998378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064541405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017346524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48181692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286247134","doi":"10.1080/0098261x.2009.10767937","title":"Judge Gender and the Voting Behavior of Justices on Two North American Supreme Courts","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Justice System Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Political science; Diversification (marketing strategy); Politics; Law; Business","score_opus":0.03763796565981158,"score_gpt":0.32137834353543,"score_spread":0.2837403778756184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286247134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9607498,0.0008524275,0.000412998,0.001151271,0.0007831933,0.0002468211,0.000008353915,0.00002938877,0.035765726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99835706,0.0001604956,0.0000826062,0.0002420492,0.0011257896,0.0000039896277,2.6335064e-7,0.0000032540754,0.00002452061],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998442,0.00028189353,0.0003201264,0.00011903177,0.00058288086,0.00025409367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890196,0.00030562194,0.00038728732,0.00006173091,0.00023376201,0.00010963223],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010540071,0.000100625286,0.00025863005,0.000050550614,0.0016355291,0.000083742,0.00018104257,0.000020519856,0.000007532669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027065695,0.000063634034,0.000073324474,0.0001860165,0.0007916342,0.000108083164,0.000021912034,0.00020114477,0.0000061227083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024749822,0.00013711047,0.034409992,0.000077763696,0.0001191005,0.0000792423,0.016776888,0.0002754768,0.000041789102,0.92961836,0.0004992775,0.017717475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002238906,0.0002683466,0.81761634,0.0003033477,0.0029546698,0.00021597456,0.17328364,0.00026128776,0.000016321655,0.0007264592,0.0017288541,0.00038586737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014126545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008685211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9288919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000082274215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013781247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286799159","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1354","title":"Book Notes: Constitutional Deliberation in Congress: The Impact of Judicial Review in a Separated System, by J. Mitchell Pickerill","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Law; Political science; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0486927997995617,"score_gpt":0.38583541087384826,"score_spread":0.33714261107428656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286799159","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[9.078375e-7,0.89088374,0.000024383526,0.00042430466,0.0003117598,0.0009019852,0.00014856375,0.000014709815,0.10728962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006982521,0.9917364,0.000012832733,0.00037768373,0.00068124395,0.000068675094,0.00006410316,0.000012371956,0.00006416581],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99568486,0.001195814,0.0015791769,0.00029441033,0.0007520782,0.0004936772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784774,0.00046177921,0.0010418788,0.00015137039,0.00035531502,0.00014192457],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020753837,0.00039487655,0.0017392382,0.00013030399,0.0008653763,0.00010428833,0.00051049056,0.00031898252,0.00040988435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030097825,0.00025638498,0.0006782278,0.0006389979,0.0019565315,0.00034197062,0.00006067845,0.00086708576,0.000089366964],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000576359,0.00039638992,0.000094846095,0.0035978283,0.0007125682,0.00013798928,0.0005365106,0.0002272193,7.76668e-7,0.79412854,0.07266962,0.1274401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030971368,0.000036880145,0.0000053225426,0.04422905,0.0002770748,0.00012873458,0.00006994299,0.000008118715,1.2093646e-7,0.0008431212,0.95381635,0.0002755387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.063567124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09238098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8811468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014016669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030348352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286807462","doi":"","title":"Speakers at the 31st Annual Canada-United States Law Institute Conference on Understanding Each Other Across the Largest Undefended Border in History","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada-United States law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers; U.S. Department of State; Wayne State University; U.S. Department of Commerce","keywords":"Law; Political science; History; Geography","score_opus":0.05679768139076642,"score_gpt":0.2951788172311577,"score_spread":0.23838113584039128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286807462","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48953295,0.0037758958,0.00024605726,0.25711718,0.004403412,0.0010656706,0.0027153252,0.00011279937,0.24103071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97458684,0.00056854973,0.000010687355,0.023032894,0.00035895122,0.000010634766,0.00010813616,0.00002061449,0.0013026935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966009,0.000468082,0.0004722074,0.00027741617,0.0011880416,0.0009933152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99833685,0.00045747956,0.00026449686,0.00024896066,0.0003709622,0.0003212648],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010400768,0.00030298383,0.00028065557,0.0000934492,0.006384271,0.00018238505,0.00076510274,0.00009266453,0.00045124005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015384327,0.00020551555,0.000066985,0.0006711806,0.002807813,0.00030950783,0.00013156842,0.0008712618,0.0000058195765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011070244,0.000053035135,0.001278638,0.0000047144563,0.00017347437,0.00015781942,0.017125046,0.010322281,0.000003034726,0.85947746,0.11112903,0.00016476696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005190149,0.000024618499,0.00046490444,0.000059254748,0.000022793256,0.00001780936,0.083872266,0.00016611497,0.000005538507,0.0041460996,0.9104202,0.0002814055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9985364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99998766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85533136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011109682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004268731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2287521374","doi":"","title":"Chief Justice Lamer and Policy Design at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Charter; Political science; Economic Justice; Majority opinion; Original jurisdiction; Court of record; Certiorari; Legislature; Court of equity; Judicial review; Judicial independence","score_opus":0.014318349460657185,"score_gpt":0.26833152593110854,"score_spread":0.25401317647045135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2287521374","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49595922,0.042973742,0.0037951157,0.30614853,0.00068141747,0.0005379954,0.00001628333,0.000031619224,0.14985609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902432,0.006893348,0.000011399883,0.0006592788,0.00047986748,7.01926e-7,1.7789809e-7,0.0000018563697,0.0017102028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984784,0.0001092857,0.00011882182,0.00006825223,0.00033130118,0.0008939446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996409,0.00010208968,0.00007640282,0.000039592345,0.00008314652,0.000057891448],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010907861,0.00006085317,0.000095540345,0.000022158963,0.0014335614,0.000016870701,0.00014120719,0.000024420167,0.000017906776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020987661,0.000041098792,0.000027587841,0.00015155508,0.00028578794,0.00005540117,0.00001717912,0.0003250154,0.0000012521272],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031530588,0.000013503699,0.0004922628,6.432176e-7,0.000054024382,0.0000014898393,0.0007394083,0.000037436137,0.00008061229,0.9888846,0.0025355879,0.007128874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003811232,0.00022783974,0.011460968,0.00001822085,0.00012681012,0.000100549056,0.01609072,0.000009840815,0.00008062322,0.92227376,0.049052294,0.00017725801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45304954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90191585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49428394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00089068647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01064754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2290184632","doi":"","title":"Comparative Reflections on Miscarriages of Justice in Australia and Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Appeal; Legislature; Law; Parliament; Accountability; Scholarship; Supreme court; Law reform; Economic Justice; Politics","score_opus":0.10092746840050328,"score_gpt":0.3890951011790911,"score_spread":0.2881676327785878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2290184632","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9644933,0.00086270337,0.000033262037,0.0022613795,0.000315213,0.00005885121,0.0000027711844,0.0000031834736,0.03196936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99870837,0.0004866541,0.000009833273,0.000037940255,0.00016943067,0.0000013144047,2.637796e-7,0.0000010406645,0.0005851828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990035,0.000093912175,0.0001107874,0.00006111381,0.00022698204,0.00050368084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997111,0.000056770572,0.000054480384,0.000020654154,0.000093269045,0.00006373924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006447872,0.000045670826,0.00010812532,0.000036911933,0.0002728948,0.000009975906,0.00006409058,0.00002185166,0.000005059849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000112076494,0.00003995092,0.000013272126,0.00012338578,0.00017143985,0.00005375554,0.0000080233785,0.00038063107,0.0000013556204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003945416,0.000026817104,0.004993471,9.865714e-7,0.000043089207,0.0000025113818,0.0029719933,0.00008840337,0.00002233,0.99062777,0.0010186747,0.00016452804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078541914,0.0003839202,0.014010808,0.00004945495,0.00007790175,0.000033722303,0.27449465,0.000003250442,0.00006494799,0.6865042,0.02339319,0.00019852309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9146897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30412355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090336485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055120816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97781956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2291194703","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2955805","title":"Rights Without Remedies: The Court Party Theory and the Demise of the Court Challenges Program","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Demise; Law; Political science; Remand (court procedure); Supreme court; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02589510658717841,"score_gpt":0.2786480956751828,"score_spread":0.25275298908800437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2291194703","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34989128,0.21096393,0.0003712644,0.124751285,0.0016270529,0.0025494634,0.0000063026387,0.00012841378,0.309711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9624307,0.03655157,0.00000952067,0.00013964012,0.0003840255,0.000027383801,6.547919e-8,0.00000418198,0.00045291524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976509,0.0007032718,0.00020544068,0.00011567681,0.00045322278,0.00087147485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991201,0.00032634128,0.00020573035,0.0001351738,0.00016754522,0.00004511072],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069871396,0.00010856817,0.00017626781,0.0000145727145,0.0024148603,0.000029433173,0.00051110797,0.000055946257,0.00001986257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031973785,0.000041021467,0.00011773583,0.00011188715,0.0037794448,0.00009125105,0.00007348432,0.00081098126,0.0000030339888],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013492093,0.00004074068,0.0011055915,0.0000012683706,0.00018555018,3.2945906e-7,0.018264975,1.6795529e-7,0.0000012592685,0.97110635,0.000086662665,0.009072192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040264567,0.000072553856,0.0027528675,0.000027448443,0.00010204165,0.000025801612,0.030922791,0.000001793182,0.000010878276,0.92518646,0.040427513,0.000067195586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015781231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029572483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6125394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000116685645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010892458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2291523871","doi":"","title":"“[This] I Know from My Grandfather”: The Battle for Admissibility of Indigenous Oral History as Proof of Tribal Land Claims","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Oklahoma College of Law - Digital Commons (University of Oklahoma)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Indigenous; Tribe; Law; Colonialism; Harm; Oral history; Doctrine; Political science; Battle; Legislative history; Legal history; Face (sociological concept); History; Sociology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02579578059511789,"score_gpt":0.21918027745900043,"score_spread":0.19338449686388254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2291523871","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8690042,0.00045088658,0.00014090986,0.0007524997,0.0001554536,0.0007500558,0.0024670912,0.00002257165,0.12625632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977462,0.00004254176,0.00029378934,0.0000063444477,0.000018990391,2.8358946e-7,0.00003321493,0.000006647528,0.0018519382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847734,0.00013214683,0.0002878619,0.0002770226,0.00055403815,0.00027157355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971827,0.00095980446,0.00059825054,0.0003377613,0.0007786816,0.00014277952],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029751507,0.0001784329,0.00071283284,0.00012872957,0.00069910963,0.0000072646326,0.0009225653,0.00017721046,0.0005399562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015987447,0.00019195105,0.00044909428,0.00032638272,0.005123522,0.00058978575,0.00031124006,0.00013169457,0.000006241026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006686106,0.0066447565,0.1488297,0.0006258908,0.0028046283,0.00007911259,0.10765905,0.000042686785,0.0010115637,0.67685115,0.030243082,0.018522264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013255734,0.0033886684,0.12407969,0.000730821,0.0013220106,0.000007858294,0.17098588,0.00013235005,0.0014758778,0.057502914,0.62569654,0.0014216615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.106625624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042788144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6193482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002584982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085497886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2292053411","doi":"","title":"The Value of Dissent in Constitutional Adjudication: A Context-Specific Analysis","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Adjudication; Dissent; Political science; Law; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Credibility; Context (archaeology); Value (mathematics); History; Politics","score_opus":0.011178001653048665,"score_gpt":0.27290950990678997,"score_spread":0.2617315082537413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2292053411","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5272793,0.08423775,0.1117968,0.07829937,0.0014922289,0.0007312543,0.0000150110645,0.00007166172,0.19607659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98917747,0.01028315,0.000011004764,0.000055815628,0.00026500336,0.0000061570227,0.000001263653,0.0000015342422,0.00019861161],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981097,0.00024182179,0.00029984125,0.00010982898,0.0004369773,0.0008018367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992452,0.0002960294,0.00015879376,0.00007740161,0.00017436838,0.000048193597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003030752,0.00006856953,0.0001704539,0.0001013962,0.0012260786,0.000034744975,0.00025816384,0.00003786244,0.000025023588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002793645,0.000048972317,0.00014616002,0.00068008224,0.0019887555,0.00008227693,0.000021603557,0.00043991875,0.000010003251],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018831766,0.000029706018,0.017531399,2.3183989e-7,0.00021601384,2.666992e-7,0.00039566905,0.00008085387,0.000007029836,0.97063166,0.000037959286,0.011050409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028264764,0.000040951498,0.024091104,0.0000114996055,0.0000846935,0.000006257626,0.009667866,0.000046741166,0.000005428111,0.8703799,0.09529294,0.00008991783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002155136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047761608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46189812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047202923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020800512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96961427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2292430605","doi":"","title":"Feminist Constitutionalism: Global Perspectives","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Feminism; Constitution; Sociology; Interpretation (philosophy); Mainstream; Reproductive justice; Law; Institution; Gender studies; Political science; Politics; Abortion; Philosophy; Democracy","score_opus":0.026145540147753093,"score_gpt":0.2932565901767571,"score_spread":0.267111050029004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2292430605","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22347832,0.0038480947,0.0000035415799,0.008418601,0.0007144066,0.00031091177,0.00009613985,0.000082023755,0.763048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957261,0.00030245513,0.000052675667,0.0021093015,0.00045458664,0.00019220103,0.0000016061979,0.0000031410098,0.0011579012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861497,0.00005803792,0.0001435805,0.00024178346,0.00027526036,0.00066636596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894685,0.00008346025,0.00003899329,0.00008499702,0.00037825806,0.0004674285],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019369218,0.00013773661,0.00021715023,0.000060206654,0.0026900175,0.00009146574,0.00018173647,0.000055874065,0.0008566723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058654463,0.00012981558,0.000053733667,0.00036712014,0.003579141,0.00013811841,0.00004695814,0.000071923474,0.0007118969],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013880951,0.000010689843,0.0077578644,0.00000227145,0.00014705202,0.000011407015,0.025778787,0.0000011277406,5.5066107e-7,0.9578028,0.008254174,0.00023193931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010121342,0.000015562542,0.0035740621,0.000013334556,0.00001008871,0.0000023223668,0.6151555,3.1001497e-7,2.7191206e-7,0.19751708,0.18343027,0.00017996189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.113321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29684222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7722478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024934139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017097436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2294498286","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Janet Hiebert, 'Charter Conflicts: What is Parliament's Role?'","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Charter; Political science; Articulation (sociology); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.009259596247797762,"score_gpt":0.2690828363888658,"score_spread":0.25982324014106806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2294498286","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00078806566,0.89803916,0.00018589864,0.08446245,0.00041542947,0.0002282981,0.0000024423032,0.00003610839,0.015842136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.044459667,0.89988303,0.0000074089503,0.049885087,0.00083175563,0.0000139617605,0.0000022214633,0.0000088916695,0.0049079848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99697584,0.00009721187,0.00029778425,0.00020148684,0.0005889071,0.0018387447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942154,0.00002963816,0.00015384569,0.000102686,0.00014581348,0.00014646021],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011975045,0.00015732962,0.0002475326,0.0000454282,0.001132323,0.00016284957,0.00029953395,0.00007365703,0.0007323373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053970467,0.00013376909,0.0001613623,0.00017897507,0.00034827404,0.0008312871,0.000034578683,0.0008531631,0.00036939167],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004186918,0.00016281889,0.0002693097,0.000019154917,0.0004918034,0.000018674828,0.007121044,0.000005562943,0.000036461413,0.8589493,0.08091356,0.05197042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030878664,0.0000763432,0.000034987348,0.00032149057,0.00005057214,0.000043829285,0.005289284,1.3691579e-7,0.000013518721,0.19258825,0.8011257,0.00014712267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002389748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003725336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7202121,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011850714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002579639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87090284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W229476001","doi":"","title":"When Courts Decide Elections","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Order (exchange); Law; General election; Law and economics; Election law; Federal election; Public administration; Voting; Economics; Politics; Finance","score_opus":0.04603129071830239,"score_gpt":0.31117348495902536,"score_spread":0.26514219424072294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W229476001","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027211113,0.5577027,0.000023789886,0.04575781,0.001194178,0.00060703483,0.000048138307,0.000050843573,0.39189437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7313908,0.20643769,0.0002490298,0.058381874,0.0016602564,0.0001392432,0.000034832618,0.00001174178,0.0016945567],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904174,0.00008584899,0.00013673115,0.000095947675,0.00016968675,0.0004700558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992064,0.000033388733,0.00003191116,0.00008517338,0.0000453947,0.0005977133],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038255495,0.00007617383,0.00014696886,0.00003846249,0.00089944527,0.000017130378,0.000120936114,0.000027749917,0.0031556014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006921565,0.00007409651,0.000065616856,0.0001561212,0.00019717256,0.00019903405,0.000010837809,0.00007040882,0.00065752666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.6071895e-7,0.00001878458,0.03762199,0.000034144377,0.000050540195,0.0000049205178,0.0006440712,8.096834e-8,8.514744e-7,0.102582745,0.82798076,0.031060548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023791757,0.000003825948,0.0033346412,0.0002553896,0.000049711198,0.0000027493895,0.00041570104,3.7221717e-8,8.120957e-7,0.002219795,0.9935962,0.000097331234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75530887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8796328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72866964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050644216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006867995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99775565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2294776267","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139976800.005","title":"Norms versus operations: the Party Constitutionin political configuration","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.08222645834012722,"score_gpt":0.2768046995629202,"score_spread":0.194578241222793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2294776267","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000024193176,0.00030567788,0.00027962434,0.0010268132,0.000811197,0.00044158325,0.00020975208,0.00009286336,0.9968083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07392882,0.00013225352,0.000013407515,0.00016924419,0.0006395157,0.000002645427,0.000059465496,0.000007771699,0.92504686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986901,0.00008965007,0.00015572277,0.0002692359,0.0004885048,0.00030675673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988461,0.00014587551,0.00007103994,0.00019543356,0.0005389677,0.00020256892],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024146322,0.00019451066,0.00022091392,0.00004936692,0.0020349203,0.000099398814,0.00034092134,0.0002514264,0.000027383128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012416476,0.0001685789,0.0001205838,0.000013272168,0.0034069114,0.00013580614,0.00013579334,0.0003062934,0.00008193609],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066265624,0.000005509083,0.0000010115039,0.000002413469,0.00008965575,0.000027519365,0.00016469306,0.000005328343,9.429531e-7,0.95611006,0.043323915,0.00020268097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004319247,0.00002756746,0.0000058597425,0.000035087585,0.00016683347,0.0000019211786,0.0010303844,0.000009805707,0.000008316289,0.000620767,0.997438,0.00022350288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00940425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011348709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9554893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055604795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013505714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99930525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2294915047","doi":"","title":"Democratic Legitimacy of Unwritten Constitutionalism: India and Canada - A Comparative Analysis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Legitimacy; Democracy; Political science; Democratic legitimacy; Political economy; Law; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.025695080106548664,"score_gpt":0.2950286610292736,"score_spread":0.26933358092272497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2294915047","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8614811,0.010129328,0.0020531707,0.005126469,0.00025706354,0.0002145607,0.000030543815,0.000017509039,0.120690286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987732,0.00071025774,0.000036553436,0.00010809717,0.00013484813,0.0000026351538,0.0000030354463,0.0000012263451,0.00023014216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836874,0.00013631604,0.00020923857,0.00010093936,0.00047892664,0.0007058132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992936,0.00008975704,0.00013820943,0.00003862432,0.0002995152,0.00014026843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010072286,0.00007965117,0.00025493963,0.00009087546,0.0005690462,0.000025658404,0.00012531746,0.000030003657,0.0000130122635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013927053,0.00006968435,0.000055554945,0.0004157524,0.00074328977,0.00013927992,0.000024235633,0.00034770364,0.0000012956081],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001613326,0.00001694878,0.048524257,6.1820555e-7,0.0007817528,0.0000035256207,0.0012137934,0.00006275993,0.0000020807213,0.9486886,0.000513366,0.00017616166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079367094,0.00011086374,0.021597685,0.00001811036,0.0007344129,0.00006415016,0.07957959,0.00004009817,0.000009700232,0.8852125,0.01157943,0.00025981173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7869326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97920036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19226775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008994755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022009796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9835345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2297785821","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1501","title":"Book Review: Courting the Right - Review of: The Charter Revolution and the Court Party, by Ted Morton and Rainer Knopff","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.008407035235305336,"score_gpt":0.2560835284093983,"score_spread":0.24767649317409296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2297785821","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000756582,0.6818163,0.0000047884237,0.13254756,0.00008691013,0.00031159163,0.0000064727174,0.000005988631,0.18514475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08829398,0.87640786,0.000008313906,0.03293578,0.00031787067,0.000015675047,0.0000010156224,0.0000043826035,0.002015126],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982978,0.0005574836,0.0003630487,0.00011573662,0.0004571322,0.00020877652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992627,0.00016355651,0.0002637369,0.00011714141,0.00013254194,0.0000603189],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023400728,0.000106641266,0.00026193372,0.0000053367394,0.0028488117,0.000053026106,0.00022454475,0.000036598976,0.00079491176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017967501,0.000044288023,0.00010905569,0.00012091152,0.0017791372,0.00015520095,0.0000465278,0.0002726987,0.000007333273],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019740699,0.000023546061,0.0001940487,0.00018175076,0.00007737135,0.0000021375251,0.0005606045,4.154969e-7,0.000010717559,0.23735511,0.7560526,0.0055219675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026274216,0.000010020214,0.00033614846,0.0041981437,0.00016086923,0.000050354476,0.000074988246,0.00000660938,0.000004167448,0.012625672,0.9821966,0.00007364731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053577153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037283138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22614405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029988336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000064215485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299104585","doi":"","title":"Les Droits Collectifs Et Leurs Implications Pour L'Article 1 De La Charte Canadienne (Collective Rights and Their Implications for Section 1 of the Canadian Charter)","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Humanities; Sociology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04925494521044273,"score_gpt":0.29622811800539894,"score_spread":0.24697317279495623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299104585","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8735453,0.005534347,0.0021530546,0.09587505,0.00052234414,0.00058435136,0.00018845644,0.000013885525,0.021583237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946451,0.0005885199,0.000021940492,0.00018285705,0.00042351565,0.000068883026,0.0000016156712,0.000009402652,0.0040581725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780285,0.00036396796,0.00021721468,0.00017406135,0.00008125862,0.0013606552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986786,0.00024536453,0.00017386218,0.0000954453,0.00048620577,0.00032052037],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018874095,0.00013489703,0.00016809205,0.00009304629,0.0034401293,0.00007552415,0.00021120592,0.00013390539,0.0000078762105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022609919,0.00010710073,0.00010551383,0.00060277304,0.00076657464,0.00015920063,0.00002214879,0.00062081806,0.0000014317525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001375918,0.0000507739,0.011684813,0.0000018673159,0.00017345892,8.464266e-8,0.011018234,0.000027569866,0.00021164432,0.97160006,0.0013639928,0.0038537385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003832735,0.00012007504,0.08560788,0.000020986092,0.00007236994,0.0001517681,0.0062719784,0.00003363341,0.000054449465,0.8772627,0.029907146,0.00011371405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7861785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9947938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20861527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006214497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023082888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2300761802","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.2015.e17","title":"Measuring Activism and Restraint: An Alternative Perspective on the Supreme Court of Canada’s Exclusion of Evidence Decisions under Section 24(2) of the Charter","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Assertion; Sociology; Criminology","score_opus":0.30224843243648697,"score_gpt":0.3440805876293182,"score_spread":0.04183215519283123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2300761802","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9729352,0.00077279756,0.00056186784,0.023001423,0.0005720418,0.00015052101,0.000038793132,0.000003162847,0.0019641856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99800444,0.0010891102,0.00010049977,0.000516215,0.00021900272,0.0000045639094,1.9777914e-7,0.000008605313,0.000057352034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977825,0.00074502255,0.00042983654,0.00023217376,0.00023137625,0.0005790742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944942,0.0033339718,0.0005224322,0.00020403015,0.0009994722,0.00044590796],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001631146,0.00017740286,0.00036383464,0.00021160541,0.00080482743,0.000018661645,0.00051072123,0.00017998165,0.0000318575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010314733,0.000107199085,0.00008360652,0.00010079481,0.0025961988,0.00022095547,0.00005985125,0.00044923293,1.502986e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004946514,0.00006116681,0.0017323724,0.00020678122,0.00021571094,0.00019963773,0.09195449,0.0003355295,0.005871947,0.89230645,0.00046704343,0.006154246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006125478,0.0009028393,0.28534028,0.0021991124,0.0035297535,0.0007556897,0.63595915,0.00004214049,0.002946021,0.066614926,0.00075965846,0.00033787356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6039965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9388885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8256915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010927592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076233656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2300764146","doi":"","title":"Canadian Federalism, the Privy Council and the Supreme Court","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Federalism; Political science; Law; New Federalism; Politics","score_opus":0.019983499610935568,"score_gpt":0.2442708159068737,"score_spread":0.22428731629593812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2300764146","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0834442,0.032705367,0.00012550279,0.69058967,0.0003878238,0.0003203739,0.0000041457374,0.000026201722,0.19239675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98028904,0.013593592,0.0000043335353,0.0022148567,0.0011551246,0.0000052450546,1.9276838e-7,0.0000033813637,0.0027342231],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978557,0.00015689354,0.000120620985,0.000082591636,0.0005121517,0.0012720462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950135,0.00010719207,0.000050845734,0.000056454333,0.00018565523,0.000098484656],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004457678,0.000073017494,0.00009365797,0.00001542421,0.0045097833,0.0001681585,0.00026184603,0.00003706593,0.000043442742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022018647,0.00003811633,0.000054669377,0.00010339619,0.00081733323,0.00011956041,0.000020841977,0.0007169858,0.00002652032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013866833,0.00000376998,0.00068651576,1.1874287e-7,0.0000569246,6.0162546e-7,0.003223268,0.000004824991,6.456946e-7,0.9882636,0.0020403452,0.00570551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032451365,0.000012098011,0.00059533864,0.0000033119893,0.00002196638,0.000047146546,0.008960481,0.000009554941,3.4350288e-7,0.37665856,0.6133077,0.000058958594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5189359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9905056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89684486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003026929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016121835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99678624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301262126","doi":"","title":"White Fire: Structural Indeterminacy, Constitutional Design, and the Constitution Behind the Text","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Constitution; Constitutional theory; Democracy; Constitutional economics; Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Constitutional crisis; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.013365190809731874,"score_gpt":0.2745297711332952,"score_spread":0.2611645803235633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301262126","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44841874,0.05538381,0.2631267,0.08367564,0.0040694983,0.0026576587,0.000017228831,0.00017546336,0.14247526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99539226,0.002924509,0.00006934737,0.0004162154,0.0008318137,0.000005944078,8.2514737e-7,0.0000025877966,0.00035648132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974455,0.0003030388,0.00026971594,0.0001488953,0.00050989666,0.0013229145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999012,0.00052095274,0.00015758055,0.00007620589,0.00015381546,0.00007944897],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066707972,0.00013397666,0.00015362704,0.000036516274,0.005390063,0.0001523915,0.00029817864,0.00007966574,0.000037227146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003452465,0.00007219525,0.000089241235,0.00016740982,0.009840402,0.0002453889,0.000055878958,0.0010852022,0.000012901364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014371714,0.000006296629,0.0041840374,4.1466885e-7,0.00007847027,0.0000040870646,0.001503154,0.000027907343,0.0000035577925,0.98073095,0.00009789408,0.013219483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013225762,0.00006636198,0.0075207697,0.000018829154,0.00009288216,0.0007417636,0.013534076,0.00006232937,0.0000075514818,0.95480704,0.021633402,0.00019244349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011201776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007497478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5469735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005272837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003794869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301715742","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2081995","title":"Judicial Independence and Democracy in Nova Scotia","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Independence (probability theory); Nova (rocket); Democracy; Political science; Law; Geology; Mathematics; Politics; Oceanography; Engineering; Statistics","score_opus":0.01307105187898912,"score_gpt":0.28850708226887584,"score_spread":0.27543603038988673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301715742","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92136574,0.00717805,0.0006094204,0.01822438,0.00032587716,0.00013287412,6.7921144e-7,0.000027045111,0.052135937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946075,0.004396536,0.000023053679,0.00034383044,0.0004903376,2.7039948e-7,1.8375512e-7,0.0000022158813,0.00013607259],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980016,0.00007860229,0.00016776027,0.00012746628,0.0003487861,0.0012757913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997338,0.000037311,0.00006209869,0.000033250948,0.000065733875,0.00006777895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001554591,0.000078525314,0.00012688144,0.00008493788,0.0006115608,0.000051428022,0.00015345303,0.000068718946,0.000030272508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017918712,0.00007318926,0.00003439621,0.00026251504,0.000235805,0.00024812715,0.000018172448,0.0009736807,0.000029216697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021509746,0.00003164156,0.030997379,2.2513085e-7,0.000012583026,0.000008032079,0.00069841545,0.0000027358028,0.000031975997,0.92978173,0.00004684784,0.038366936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026376534,0.00007864757,0.055978596,0.000016767219,0.000008036912,0.000047938556,0.0032133006,0.0000016883664,0.0000040091318,0.9394844,0.0008050989,0.000097761316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010680634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19930762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18862699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048006844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024139066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2306762395","doi":"","title":"Ontario and the Direct Access Model to Human Rights","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Human rights; Enforcement; Statute; Political science; Work (physics); Law; Legislature; International human rights law; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.02273174387358119,"score_gpt":0.2958025081941879,"score_spread":0.27307076432060673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2306762395","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5907751,0.001229836,0.00073624175,0.017172657,0.00014488616,0.00033133815,4.786887e-7,0.000022117547,0.3895874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915554,0.0005311086,0.00001049371,0.00034895522,0.0002695814,0.000018014445,1.5458633e-7,0.0000023106895,0.007263993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985008,0.000076555196,0.00011897711,0.00010292721,0.00025511096,0.0009455801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996709,0.000043845255,0.000045320594,0.000048305323,0.00010915627,0.00008242427],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010089073,0.00007201267,0.00011910475,0.00003131048,0.0031236624,0.00021557648,0.0002867085,0.000029264747,0.000116388146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032518306,0.000042334326,0.00004470626,0.000107277694,0.0003716463,0.00027230085,0.00006478755,0.0005125271,0.00003765061],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010551408,0.000009248895,0.0010067769,1.1586201e-7,0.000046858488,2.2947627e-7,0.0025220825,0.000022255868,0.0000035006544,0.99388546,0.00049442047,0.001998528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026479329,0.00002226953,0.0015985799,0.0000042234847,0.000016854647,0.0000048385605,0.0007134373,0.00001064019,0.0000018601646,0.9683308,0.028959077,0.00007260501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44774857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.932586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4848374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006428971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013472126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99817413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2310502863","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4958279","title":"A Comparative Law Analysis of U.S. Judicial Assistance","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02340685735882302,"score_gpt":0.3306394652976949,"score_spread":0.30723260793887186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2310502863","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31061795,0.08251905,0.011933873,0.0069505763,0.0013479275,0.00022645805,0.000040701056,0.00013527651,0.5862282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99583846,0.00328319,0.000015302,0.000059560745,0.00037514605,0.000002495926,0.0000014629527,0.000002516615,0.0004218701],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832165,0.00010379983,0.0002059159,0.00012333064,0.00039699307,0.0008482929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996125,0.00010347118,0.000067921,0.00004172243,0.00012798671,0.000046370096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012402342,0.00007261673,0.0002642049,0.00015007558,0.00064731285,0.000058526977,0.00015622246,0.000039249953,0.00007126268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025315676,0.00006168827,0.00022459425,0.0011998916,0.0005885071,0.00015254073,0.000016009672,0.0005423297,0.000017173987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015442265,0.000020789987,0.00052871386,9.1585605e-7,0.0019178962,0.0000026277453,0.002302113,0.000030831634,0.000028178929,0.993763,0.00010000069,0.0012894459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082344835,0.00006350228,0.0016528997,0.000026929776,0.0008704711,0.0000040606037,0.011626119,0.00006158667,0.00001684688,0.94592774,0.0395535,0.00011400897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062100408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20299147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6852205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059609406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025733563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9387765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2311267665","doi":"","title":"Does Judicial Independence Matter? A Study of the Determinants of Administrative Litigation in an Authoritarian Regime","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial independence; Political science; Rule of law; Plaintiff; Judicial review; Context (archaeology); Authoritarianism; Administrative law; Law; Corporate governance; Law and economics; Democracy; Business; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.05875214024543815,"score_gpt":0.3435176419116362,"score_spread":0.2847655016661981,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2311267665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.983738,0.000031920255,0.0000017311683,0.00055915903,0.0004236838,0.00040243485,0.000014087989,0.00001021461,0.014818748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99957156,0.00000244579,0.00003148454,0.0000561071,0.0001701113,0.000025378007,6.198591e-7,0.000003312578,0.00013899287],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998296,0.00039294793,0.00032410005,0.00019240096,0.0006177419,0.00017676651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992427,0.00006085489,0.00019407895,0.00016283103,0.00023617897,0.00010332955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007533323,0.00008817323,0.00021616575,0.00003220031,0.00034214128,0.00002713439,0.00033149862,0.000080551865,0.000035509533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000296867,0.000055455672,0.000035901256,0.00030457342,0.0006967633,0.00033233105,0.00008203128,0.0001516048,0.00001139515],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056506808,0.0003127299,0.88286716,0.000003967739,0.0000108236945,0.000005621559,0.019078722,0.0000045657466,0.00004558399,0.097318135,0.00003895114,0.00025723717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006599995,0.00038519615,0.814001,0.00011510816,0.000027928345,6.2705516e-7,0.095601074,0.00000550046,0.000544576,0.08805348,0.00045088088,0.00015461368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09612212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49965551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40353337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007863286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052796607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90989685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2313550107","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1163","title":"American Citations and the McLachlin Court: An Empirical Study","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Categorization; Law; Political science; Point (geometry); Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04015214137463527,"score_gpt":0.3702610854581444,"score_spread":0.3301089440835091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2313550107","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22760776,0.00053739146,0.00037270095,0.06550529,0.0002433427,0.000308852,0.0000042995644,0.000050548126,0.70536983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972596,0.0001237648,0.00017984342,0.001818705,0.0005563148,0.0000040275117,3.8020656e-7,0.000002429784,0.000054938195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986651,0.00043766468,0.00017385614,0.0001127239,0.00039811214,0.00021254712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993877,0.00017061576,0.00009016221,0.000064613465,0.00013491466,0.00015202528],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010006132,0.00007663113,0.0001580556,0.00002421921,0.0038585751,0.00020560382,0.00017446863,0.000021110634,0.000033396864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013372811,0.000048767968,0.000049391198,0.00017367324,0.0015605983,0.00018981386,0.00001834641,0.00022613489,0.000010097268],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004342596,0.00019505231,0.0100523345,1.023886e-7,0.000031314674,0.00001296269,0.009696808,0.000006519554,0.0000016191074,0.9741069,0.00032879357,0.0055241697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012600109,0.00044872856,0.16274284,0.000008534781,0.00009226403,0.000033530876,0.065087974,0.000028438732,6.244727e-7,0.75872076,0.0114102,0.00016606391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052158035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29239276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76965183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039337076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000092568094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99743825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2314620070","doi":"","title":"The Alice in Wonderland Dimension of the Canadian Judicial System","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Indigenous policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Alice (programming language); Politics; Service (business); Dimension (graph theory); Law; Political science; Sociology; History; Art history; Business","score_opus":0.03190943470438198,"score_gpt":0.2730860767032751,"score_spread":0.24117664199889313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2314620070","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51934856,0.00034125333,3.8637415e-7,0.0013594268,0.000348416,0.00028527004,0.000010266798,0.000012657023,0.47829375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993289,0.00004986477,0.0000024154144,0.00020800806,0.00026908642,0.000008877564,1.9557943e-7,0.0000027341662,0.0001299148],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908984,0.000117853226,0.0001431706,0.00007487433,0.00022803922,0.000346212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996477,0.0000497781,0.000063689484,0.00010319848,0.00006551677,0.00007011202],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003950244,0.000054233657,0.00008771156,0.00006296459,0.002761801,0.000016752587,0.00028247802,0.000059146536,0.000004409894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001006212,0.000032036678,0.00003897789,0.00040557896,0.00063345575,0.000029620625,0.000034957633,0.00008030401,0.00001441188],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007088438,0.000014229682,0.04708484,0.0000021468709,0.000015047125,0.0000039352144,0.11913236,0.0000012495456,0.000007633129,0.8318439,0.00009684961,0.0017907309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032006297,0.000055766293,0.79233927,0.00011501751,0.000029444178,0.000007038804,0.042117234,0.0000018332274,0.00018284256,0.056310788,0.10826333,0.00025737373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99629384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7755331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046201725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026973577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99853647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W231489046","doi":"","title":"Social Science Evidence in Constitutional Rights Cases in Germany and Canada: Some Comparative Observations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Fredericton; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Constitutional law; Social rights; Law; Human rights","score_opus":0.0732627663103254,"score_gpt":0.3272499201419768,"score_spread":0.2539871538316514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W231489046","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9872048,0.0026872875,0.000028561753,0.0052758944,0.00013307147,0.00017363207,0.000002195576,0.000006617361,0.0044879396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99863744,0.0008575613,0.0000097679085,0.00017451146,0.00021072119,0.000015454134,3.2730983e-7,9.918244e-7,0.00009322238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99786896,0.00010114042,0.00022243458,0.000159739,0.000501307,0.001146397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940425,0.00021051038,0.000077990175,0.000027887909,0.00020362003,0.00007574559],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011210333,0.00008452564,0.00015259585,0.0001200893,0.0020761706,0.000084161795,0.0001982861,0.000032352775,0.000017950686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021995141,0.00007561235,0.000019527937,0.0004316074,0.0029133882,0.0011029107,0.00003959794,0.0005715251,0.0000052743567],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047151434,0.000018411609,0.031554297,5.0422665e-7,0.000007726094,0.00000680229,0.0010408334,0.000006617411,0.000043666565,0.9670872,0.00008879527,0.00014041291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021517643,0.000024259247,0.31691703,0.000044129225,0.0000055154005,0.00004199157,0.0074921483,0.000014572082,0.0000048489474,0.67363566,0.0014656323,0.00013905487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86499923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98711884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29345158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027809541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021410935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2315473695","doi":"10.1017/s0026749x13000024","title":"The Case of Ayesha, Muslim ‘Courts’, and the Rule of Law: Some ethnographic lessons for legal theory","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Asian Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; State (computer science); Islam; Law; Subaltern; Rule of law; Converse; Political science; Sociology; Elite; Idealization; Geography; Philosophy; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.044896317712816734,"score_gpt":0.3437683140837928,"score_spread":0.2988719963709761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2315473695","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48957685,0.096167035,0.0045974716,0.18429323,0.001394522,0.0023592256,0.00019695674,0.00012750449,0.22128722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99817663,0.0011698517,0.00003754911,0.00020837785,0.00016391443,0.00006974627,2.7912748e-7,0.000004530059,0.00016913873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901575,0.00025435849,0.00020989383,0.000136263,0.00016913403,0.0002146254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807256,0.0014535774,0.00013276935,0.0001230991,0.00019033639,0.000027625714],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019604857,0.0000980556,0.00029017025,0.00002461934,0.0026476688,0.000024586594,0.00015419394,0.000038064136,8.202146e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005315238,0.000052094423,0.00012280245,0.000055993703,0.007191507,0.000080877835,0.00011146131,0.00007159746,4.5937094e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063917294,0.00001641609,0.000030606927,0.000013344873,0.00021975102,0.000001679183,0.048316155,0.0000020691048,0.0000057624034,0.93314946,0.00008730107,0.018093554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045731274,0.000030503741,0.00029609248,0.000024090734,0.00009783309,0.000003139681,0.07349913,0.000041858788,0.000018541752,0.91830987,0.007151399,0.000070229835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003170128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011568135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50859976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000114577415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000398801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2316239106","doi":"10.1017/s0008423911000151","title":"Explaining Dissent on the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Supreme court; Political science; Humanities; Ambiguity; Law; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06497905880260811,"score_gpt":0.2743127841513881,"score_spread":0.20933372534877998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2316239106","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5975205,0.0011415994,0.000029810702,0.09681882,0.004086214,0.000088730274,0.000053346637,0.0000014491382,0.30025956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977735,0.000014781827,0.000040723942,0.0013671967,0.0003948623,5.8948166e-7,4.1698467e-8,0.0000024813141,0.0004057686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99745196,0.00010503413,0.00035018063,0.00011691723,0.0008394377,0.0011364534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970351,0.00031571477,0.00015260748,0.00009580069,0.00050851266,0.0018922528],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015751425,0.000098185206,0.00018719549,0.00008338921,0.0012996583,0.000033764692,0.00073980045,0.000038925962,0.0008846318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020349103,0.00006771188,0.00007487884,0.00059313513,0.009925992,0.0001816588,0.00002516,0.00023517793,0.000007990313],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032079208,0.000012861128,0.0042896317,0.000001990821,0.000012546745,0.00007153158,0.002645315,0.0000027604656,0.000008956122,0.98982435,0.0028033336,0.00032351504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021932989,0.00050009537,0.6029332,0.00077876437,0.0001013758,0.000114692804,0.079467006,0.000037958787,0.0014899279,0.24882975,0.065088995,0.0004389047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9919504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99086654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74099463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012673762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029612845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99960524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2316378233","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100006554","title":"Confronting Judicial Supremacy: A Defence of Judicial Activism and the Supreme Court of Cananda's Legal Rights Jurisprudence","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Jurisprudence; Political science; Supreme court; Philosophy; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.015321607028045425,"score_gpt":0.2568337746417047,"score_spread":0.2415121676136593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2316378233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9197263,0.024059314,0.00011960374,0.02096556,0.002115621,0.00033596013,0.0002148975,0.000004741908,0.032457963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927671,0.0043063476,0.00010516822,0.0010457817,0.0010445969,0.000004075627,0.0000022587394,0.000015071034,0.0007096166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972562,0.0003216561,0.0009023432,0.00029553458,0.00034010794,0.0008841441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996485,0.0006617365,0.0009007596,0.00015166902,0.0008217423,0.0009790967],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002261166,0.00029331614,0.0010316389,0.00006872197,0.0017827505,0.0000943736,0.0004453226,0.0002850475,0.000089064546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003315085,0.0002677901,0.0004747347,0.00039341603,0.010204542,0.00050386955,0.000054070715,0.0006558979,5.681317e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062844905,0.000021893475,0.0016944036,0.000060055325,0.0004056924,0.00011328149,0.05211553,0.000016168038,0.000029563022,0.9426496,0.0010205219,0.0018104387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006185639,0.00064485427,0.0147198215,0.0027890066,0.0019888591,0.0012103077,0.083014004,0.00032479345,0.00009084337,0.41646698,0.47131744,0.001247432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9104721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9727148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5261826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006253136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038508067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2316790870","doi":"10.1628/joer-2007-0032","title":"Certaines utilisations de principes constitutionnels implicites par la Cour suprême du Canada","year":2007,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Jahrbuch des öffentlichen Rechts der Gegenwart Neue Folge","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art","score_opus":0.026801567828237255,"score_gpt":0.278337684001233,"score_spread":0.25153611617299576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2316790870","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88605833,0.030725773,0.0042134807,0.010784545,0.0053416663,0.0018327404,0.0006273137,0.00044778,0.05996835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990056,0.0033152401,0.00051667256,0.0013219832,0.0033652086,0.00010150896,0.00006551494,0.000047320216,0.0012105982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942853,0.00060447387,0.0010785487,0.0008969532,0.0012228197,0.0019119206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99513656,0.0023873632,0.00040152593,0.00044740937,0.00078273437,0.00084439176],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023339014,0.00071764056,0.00076400995,0.00021763366,0.0046038614,0.0003356765,0.0008026215,0.0005405533,0.0003323996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018231138,0.00070477265,0.00034804942,0.0011853183,0.0034080865,0.0004807902,0.0002997395,0.00060844293,0.00014015935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020225068,0.0007796688,0.3746752,0.00016281739,0.0023464793,0.0007123287,0.019870447,0.00032728864,0.00091354304,0.5599883,0.032357782,0.0076638805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007461075,0.000084079686,0.091665655,0.00018978902,0.00075080805,0.00008738703,0.004928025,0.00007961364,0.0015577124,0.016391397,0.88250786,0.0010115515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6382877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8471001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8501501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001654761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060318904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317993304","doi":"10.1017/s1744552313000037","title":"The Question for the Description of the Law. By Reidar Edvinsson, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2009. x + 113 pp. ISBN 978-3-540-70501-7, £99 hardback.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Law and economics; Law; Political science; Sociology; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.029214662150871908,"score_gpt":0.30505415021221577,"score_spread":0.27583948806134384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317993304","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37707555,0.060507953,0.0058020414,0.39972663,0.0275569,0.0034209178,0.00029764688,0.00006208837,0.12555027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944086,0.0024697545,0.00006796889,0.0015036975,0.00085328985,0.000028268589,0.0000012316593,0.0000064373885,0.000660754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998041,0.00020169033,0.0005884182,0.000113015805,0.00084772834,0.00020815122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971982,0.00072256563,0.00054390245,0.00011017818,0.0013781535,0.000047005393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014199759,0.00011114524,0.00017336111,0.000023750375,0.0008114572,0.00020135223,0.0009009692,0.00007489275,0.000057408062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006039442,0.00006023632,0.00021339742,0.000101352205,0.0010646839,0.00048182724,0.00008095777,0.00024956957,0.000015898508],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009256604,0.00007030758,0.0019851618,0.0000019916308,0.00014711292,0.0000011868651,0.0013656066,0.00003485466,0.0005379516,0.9624845,0.02331926,0.009959516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007170012,0.00007325184,0.007945773,0.00023151484,0.00004249137,0.000009767539,0.0040308326,0.000087651526,0.0006423142,0.09054989,0.8955451,0.00012438762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03519461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038348936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8722259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024355041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001933509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9791987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317999976","doi":"10.4000/ethiquepublique.1976","title":"La réforme du mode de scrutin : l’unanimité des partis est-elle indispensable ?","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Éthique Publique","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021384395422956285,"score_gpt":0.28041728380327124,"score_spread":0.25903288838031496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317999976","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22282925,0.012977884,0.0016203297,0.1797239,0.000547711,0.00040800683,0.00006008591,0.00020020122,0.5816326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.971039,0.00963291,0.002749705,0.010381044,0.001716339,0.00011381249,0.000008275579,0.000024500265,0.004334432],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969478,0.00072728796,0.00042502803,0.00040724705,0.0004125029,0.001080104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984371,0.0005014046,0.00016128858,0.00017604578,0.00033498305,0.00038914426],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019360827,0.00029773792,0.00037260778,0.00008988922,0.0015077882,0.00028096637,0.00043836213,0.0005753577,0.0011010027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011678629,0.00030597704,0.00020372613,0.0006599463,0.0026227152,0.0011625995,0.00020654313,0.00063948246,0.000555492],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021628943,0.00027009798,0.013058466,0.000027986773,0.00007580406,0.000027551541,0.009402727,0.00029155263,0.000026675305,0.94108176,0.012593533,0.023122188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020816381,0.000043798354,0.004657227,0.0001371632,0.000044756107,0.00003793299,0.002278298,0.00041792035,0.00017420955,0.3383361,0.65333986,0.00032455978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052022696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0863975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7482097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008553737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016331117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318171966","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100008127","title":"Dual Legal systems and the Basic Structure Doctrine or Constitutions: The Case of India","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Constitution; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01607851521358937,"score_gpt":0.2554981068312578,"score_spread":0.2394195916176684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318171966","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85736036,0.069662474,0.000052133462,0.05116709,0.004067324,0.0005938135,0.001031073,0.000005400957,0.016060336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99242157,0.0034965225,0.000044269145,0.0023009172,0.0010307727,0.000007116757,0.0000026937619,0.000009093891,0.0006870287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824077,0.00026288148,0.0005855246,0.00019085543,0.0001366539,0.00058331643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99765956,0.000546749,0.00045455154,0.00013874618,0.00043708444,0.0007633174],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014693137,0.00022196771,0.00057366455,0.000039053193,0.0028092202,0.00019095528,0.00023410597,0.00022520371,0.00006826459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003041644,0.00014494233,0.00028033424,0.00037437244,0.01231496,0.00033769716,0.00003349707,0.0006641726,5.987422e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019119687,0.0000079042375,0.00006942218,0.000067242785,0.00039611905,0.0012931884,0.041618682,0.0001435008,0.0000013354663,0.95508564,0.000552015,0.00074582617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0053001046,0.0003268793,0.0007321105,0.001111551,0.0013162693,0.03758183,0.33715677,0.00004959621,0.000005139963,0.20794289,0.40786478,0.0006120831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7924288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9522589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74714273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007705393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005156412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99848896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318623215","doi":"10.1017/s0021223716000017","title":"The Canadian Charter's Override Clause: Lessons for Israel","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Legislature; Charter; Political science; Politics; Supreme court; Law; State (computer science); Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.07008557188768984,"score_gpt":0.363649075735374,"score_spread":0.2935635038476842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318623215","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000091923815,0.15371227,0.000056124263,0.47693783,0.00090975646,0.0011444179,0.00016338968,0.000059957947,0.36692435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7122546,0.24495043,0.000057694895,0.035249054,0.001375343,0.0005577546,0.0000057287293,0.000018415401,0.005531007],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988498,0.00009022081,0.00019657738,0.00017513506,0.00024505105,0.0004432161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990995,0.00032030087,0.00006870387,0.0001654093,0.0001591578,0.00018693184],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008316452,0.00010069109,0.00019720763,0.000010796048,0.003403899,0.00006420357,0.0003074101,0.00005043137,0.00005468503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032289315,0.00005313683,0.00013452802,0.00012313444,0.00083043694,0.00011845661,0.00002660881,0.000050189417,0.00029029293],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013208345,0.0000037601833,0.0001047525,0.0000223522,0.000023287987,9.883441e-7,0.00003163318,4.5128634e-9,0.0000023174928,0.95306736,0.022035852,0.024706377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007913272,0.000009012066,0.0003592352,0.00071766134,0.000040436098,6.830069e-7,0.000071527254,6.6767946e-8,0.0000025595489,0.027814645,0.9708035,0.000101523394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5782469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9772983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94876766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021554533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005779674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2319359069","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1286","title":"A New Era in the Selection of Supreme Court Judges?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Selection (genetic algorithm); Law; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0207418315513999,"score_gpt":0.2729500003378018,"score_spread":0.2522081687864019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2319359069","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015877483,0.00049816543,0.0004137167,0.007949685,0.00019334228,0.00008080615,0.0000014425505,0.000010581599,0.97497475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983289,0.000095790616,0.00031977738,0.00018994889,0.00087425386,0.0000015858428,5.1848684e-7,0.0000021800183,0.00018702868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990228,0.00013297923,0.0001882363,0.00006625751,0.0004035088,0.00018623496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996822,0.00006629888,0.00008978496,0.000033406704,0.00009261103,0.00003568805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006425488,0.00005480325,0.00010059758,0.000029376817,0.0008000776,0.00005949896,0.00016688716,0.0000423049,0.00019807488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003606856,0.00003888294,0.00006068041,0.0002130741,0.00019005359,0.00014241545,0.000011729935,0.00019978205,0.000011122877],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010000284,0.00004062509,0.017234676,7.028184e-7,0.000008569559,0.000004965324,0.0006158418,0.00004475356,0.0000800971,0.97633207,0.004833031,0.00079464505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043717324,0.000055405893,0.07828254,0.00003566765,0.00002622436,0.000046741156,0.00200498,0.0000078814655,0.00009406229,0.84803236,0.07086342,0.000113573864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42500716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7796491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98245144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007323861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019706301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6153631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320877804","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100007092","title":"Paul Howe and Peter H. Russell (eds.), Judicial Power and Canadian Democracy, Montreal / Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2001, xviii + 327 pp.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Media studies; Power (physics); Art history; Humanities; Art; Sociology; Physics","score_opus":0.012215415330278374,"score_gpt":0.21521116453386585,"score_spread":0.20299574920358748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320877804","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5389882,0.008426498,0.0000071231043,0.03844739,0.001341479,0.0004886198,0.0010194526,0.000031508214,0.41124976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841767,0.0102088945,0.000075082644,0.0031542857,0.00035164066,9.945873e-7,0.0000043775663,0.00001635341,0.0020116584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981644,0.0001258075,0.00028594508,0.00030689096,0.00015982162,0.00095714536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965587,0.00014386103,0.00019710226,0.00010379007,0.0002989338,0.0026975751],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005857142,0.00023344367,0.00043924982,0.00007389632,0.003197394,0.00013364872,0.00022687989,0.0002620486,0.00012303247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011217255,0.00026543794,0.00018609596,0.00017901287,0.0016672304,0.00045350587,0.000034046847,0.00044986478,0.0000015776295],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015039966,0.000020974547,0.0028017769,0.00002911744,0.00037256436,0.0010237304,0.030373102,0.000005126941,0.000005012682,0.90163773,0.060687367,0.003028443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007164978,0.00010793511,0.008699564,0.00010086444,0.00017452097,0.00013348504,0.01348347,0.000016966022,0.0000011797487,0.009560372,0.96657044,0.0004347201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9567509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9890973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9058831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009691718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010258458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2325992556","doi":"10.14288/1.0096786","title":"An administrative history of the Supreme Court of British Columbia with particular reference to the Vancouver registry : its civil records, their composition, and their selection for preservation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Composition (language); Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.02237188476977705,"score_gpt":0.20964994085904062,"score_spread":0.18727805608926357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2325992556","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959863,0.00011122767,0.00027817397,0.00031623404,0.00017640262,0.00054447085,0.00042004997,0.00001628013,0.0021508534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988033,0.00007729889,0.00011522979,0.00003787086,0.000039662784,0.0000054161887,0.000007624016,0.0000039778806,0.000909574],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992199,0.000106647494,0.000115606985,0.00020981295,0.00021276223,0.00013526289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987243,0.0000878919,0.00020135562,0.00013468489,0.0007916451,0.00006013279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032145585,0.000034125227,0.0001721186,0.000008317204,0.0006585703,0.00004809502,0.0002754986,0.00007501146,0.0000410102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006665073,0.00006998744,0.000049640224,0.0001877287,0.0010879663,0.00030417467,0.000046754383,0.00010952244,1.611587e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041110563,0.0014916185,0.48909658,0.00033077854,0.00060951925,0.000010131436,0.0307206,0.00009205703,0.017790284,0.0010840215,0.3011124,0.1572509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003179462,0.0001800579,0.9679968,0.00018414363,0.000041670963,0.000006012549,0.009553364,0.000062928826,0.00001068852,0.001017889,0.020518932,0.00010960491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5977814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9977508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47890016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000081592036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044932283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5065257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329462712","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2931484","title":"Modelling Fundamental Legal Change: The Paradox of Context and the Context of Paradox","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.049322577273554165,"score_gpt":0.29172302385721355,"score_spread":0.2424004465836594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2329462712","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81389695,0.14080316,0.0025125085,0.029265067,0.0005815823,0.0006191292,0.000011328784,0.000015113473,0.012295174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989724,0.009566317,0.0000056980466,0.00020162879,0.00034211137,0.0000080403925,2.9026313e-7,0.000003379005,0.00014857909],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983919,0.00022138291,0.00023985236,0.000081221275,0.0004228818,0.0006427138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935347,0.00016746309,0.00020524443,0.00006073764,0.00015917637,0.000053900927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028634665,0.00008088244,0.00020897257,0.000023556868,0.000644407,0.000032526837,0.00023266954,0.000035614,0.0000053023778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000086855565,0.000043652537,0.00008975645,0.00011975848,0.0017757805,0.00015563933,0.00004202753,0.00046992736,0.000002493633],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018059836,0.000021064006,0.0011828393,8.749097e-7,0.00010965865,4.3681882e-7,0.011036831,0.00003792429,0.0000018775017,0.9754643,0.000050533632,0.01191308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021823165,0.00022315202,0.00014211338,0.000036805926,0.00010019401,0.000060516828,0.32236975,0.00062566943,0.000018643595,0.6501542,0.023960723,0.00012592049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02328583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0140451845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32531008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018330384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001305792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9832182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329744406","doi":"10.1017/s0008423900000226","title":"A Response to Mendelsohn's “Public Brokerage: Constitutional Reform and the Accommodation of Mass Publics”","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publics; Accommodation; Constitution; Political science; Principal (computer security); Limiting; Constitutional law; Public service; Law and economics; Law; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.029192557794829696,"score_gpt":0.29541640299359456,"score_spread":0.26622384519876485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2329744406","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5757118,0.00015675013,0.00042000297,0.24004391,0.00029402596,0.00016558704,0.00003501759,0.0000051043708,0.18316782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99791217,0.000011881164,0.00019964167,0.0016144069,0.0001298085,0.0000018831793,1.7058045e-7,0.0000010659649,0.00012895398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831474,0.00017315814,0.00026445813,0.00010078776,0.0005838378,0.0005630339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977936,0.00025243175,0.000064308406,0.000073243755,0.00056584185,0.0012505304],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043219673,0.00005826421,0.00014028739,0.00021322284,0.0013500912,0.0001721905,0.00043872348,0.00003371344,0.00033199068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033218313,0.00003885836,0.00004523459,0.00070645905,0.0144014,0.00050206867,0.000019134191,0.0001243949,0.000009196004],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005598653,0.000004391174,0.00073105266,4.6254107e-7,0.0000053244003,0.00000527689,0.00079990947,0.0000036396614,0.0000355708,0.9965963,0.00011954447,0.0016425772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016120552,0.00023205768,0.2503663,0.00009773964,0.000042971893,0.0001427306,0.017428372,0.000054953056,0.000118990734,0.4499194,0.27964506,0.00033935346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.109137736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050326932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5466769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077208236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009938401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2331375094","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Override: Constitutional Model or Bête Noire of Constitutional Politics?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Knesset; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Constitutional law; Politics; Legislation; Constitutional court; Basic law; Israeli law; Constitution; Parliament; Common law; Municipal law","score_opus":0.04098377836588365,"score_gpt":0.3037416626573402,"score_spread":0.2627578842914566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2331375094","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030999718,0.017864367,0.024072472,0.06359783,0.0032515088,0.00074145006,0.0003166392,0.00009082905,0.8590652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99513113,0.0015602495,0.0000666445,0.00034384875,0.0006611729,0.00000608145,0.000004245859,0.0000031921581,0.0022234386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99681795,0.00010852523,0.0003096153,0.0001308215,0.00081245176,0.0018206552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985399,0.00013923939,0.00014296659,0.00008271762,0.0007027535,0.00039238884],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023170176,0.00012218775,0.00016532786,0.00008279269,0.004330838,0.00008888637,0.00036205043,0.00009434248,0.00002728348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009634241,0.000083650586,0.0001020215,0.0002287535,0.0088547915,0.00021543216,0.000035165765,0.00074898265,0.000028714301],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003395202,0.000017961314,0.0015397228,5.316536e-7,0.000099397745,0.000004569104,0.00030965905,0.0005674097,0.0000017517316,0.9949916,0.0020285284,0.0004048882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003863363,0.00005059507,0.00010263161,0.000015888572,0.000030670624,0.00012531533,0.0055464944,0.00013539677,0.0000029305816,0.85878885,0.13468808,0.00012682809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11368662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8639177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9641314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034643374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1378137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2334211255","doi":"10.5235/108546812801228149","title":"The Incoherence of Judicial Review in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judicial Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Political science; Judicial opinion; Judicial activism; Law","score_opus":0.03762319479688505,"score_gpt":0.32732337396518735,"score_spread":0.2897001791683023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2334211255","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008426893,0.87542266,0.000002009409,0.015217084,0.0007437811,0.00066467363,0.0000073672854,0.000008674213,0.10709104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38425088,0.6113037,0.00000595425,0.004009292,0.00035265373,0.000049310354,0.0000010115782,0.0000029150824,0.000024307563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99781734,0.00033852115,0.00056788133,0.00012285788,0.00069458206,0.00045883877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989937,0.00034938336,0.0002397859,0.00014960204,0.00015176144,0.0001157928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020729834,0.00011406665,0.00048963126,0.000015923773,0.00051456527,0.000006102417,0.0003567292,0.000030733616,0.00017966503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021326712,0.000080569924,0.00009298829,0.0007368402,0.0004425416,0.00011506544,0.00008029417,0.00015608389,0.00003893757],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011849606,0.000078798956,0.045698363,0.0016175705,0.000050409766,0.0000065347904,0.00044634682,2.1994408e-7,0.0000034854359,0.4741254,0.1387069,0.33925414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049238097,0.000007703023,0.0153988525,0.009474101,0.00006151717,6.7407916e-7,0.00020758342,8.9965816e-8,0.0000020757213,0.003186991,0.971489,0.00012213738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9581366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98337936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83278215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003858851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030370976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53876805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2335318655","doi":"10.1086/677057","title":"The Politics of Judicial Retirement in Canada and the United Kingdom","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Courts","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Supreme court; Kingdom; Political science; Test (biology); Law; Mandatory retirement; Demographic economics; Economics","score_opus":0.02627512220332856,"score_gpt":0.2725991933721596,"score_spread":0.24632407116883104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2335318655","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96780646,0.00063896104,0.000008564938,0.013215119,0.0002421282,0.0000415525,0.0000010826622,5.897083e-7,0.018045548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987195,0.0003922945,0.0000037781485,0.0006742906,0.00019577798,3.3623508e-7,3.6922163e-8,7.185174e-7,0.0000132566865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993459,0.00011160093,0.00016959617,0.00002453286,0.00025692116,0.00009144145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993926,0.00033101515,0.00012015061,0.000022412227,0.000099556004,0.000034239696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007917357,0.000029277066,0.000100169585,0.0000115899375,0.0005109467,0.000016964817,0.000066650224,0.000011665894,0.000001707357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013256005,0.000014834403,0.000015406718,0.00004448128,0.00074415706,0.00002269048,0.00001831009,0.00006779718,3.1208568e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023715971,0.0000035515377,0.005062336,9.03478e-7,0.000012231229,0.0000016235117,0.00082399824,0.0000037697837,0.0000013539158,0.9934758,0.00019892902,0.00039177906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013995025,0.00007551273,0.042358845,0.00011280882,0.00006174595,0.000008194504,0.006179727,0.00004813056,0.0000209306,0.46384805,0.48579705,0.000089520916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9480491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9561671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52962774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050373594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003676127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39298403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336064461","doi":"10.24926/19441992.600","title":"Teaching the Rule of Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of international law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Engineering, Michigan State University; Stanford Law School; Georgetown University; York University; George Washington University; Michigan State University; University of Minnesota; Yale University","keywords":"Rule of law; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.0201261584110371,"score_gpt":0.30868491608554094,"score_spread":0.28855875767450384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336064461","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051007256,0.0007244098,0.00013253634,0.053757228,0.00081368245,0.000040703693,0.000006430519,0.000005410004,0.89351237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99642015,0.00008697744,0.00023877749,0.0019574452,0.0008787037,3.573398e-7,4.6270944e-7,0.0000014841547,0.0004156508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896795,0.000067560264,0.00028346683,0.000047038342,0.00053854217,0.00009542666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992052,0.00013571086,0.00023507631,0.000040743307,0.00034827008,0.00003500844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072493876,0.000050378334,0.00011205817,0.000030209107,0.00043409166,0.00003349003,0.00039901485,0.000026120802,0.000093934585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001465282,0.0000327196,0.00011214007,0.000046176374,0.00045795992,0.00024716146,0.000022497696,0.00014947123,0.0000063544494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020362397,0.00005614024,0.00021840668,3.7748808e-7,0.00004336406,0.0000058568726,0.0020623168,0.000010101669,0.00030146868,0.9947267,0.00049486605,0.0020600162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018049742,0.00005637772,0.0019970986,0.000049332673,0.000018433082,0.000020237185,0.0009684615,0.0000031546122,0.00025823107,0.17662363,0.8197711,0.00005340493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034685943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007464733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9454129,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051633127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006589365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336260986","doi":"10.7202/1035628ar","title":"A Consistent Inconsistency—An Interpretationof Sections 23 and 56(1) of the Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms of Québec","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Charter; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Statute; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Tribunal; Interpretation (philosophy); Common law; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0151438784145269,"score_gpt":0.25075418137452976,"score_spread":0.23561030296000285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336260986","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9831058,0.00023332787,0.0000439999,0.00097507413,0.000064403095,0.00012731228,0.000027945065,0.0000068378404,0.015415298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999523,0.000031723248,0.00003875318,0.00001912217,0.000052967553,0.000008167315,3.6022584e-7,0.0000019399079,0.00032395878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944246,0.00006718206,0.0002043955,0.00009979202,0.00009895851,0.000087240885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994953,0.00011388704,0.0001391085,0.00009576281,0.000116526324,0.000039388524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001654814,0.00004211037,0.00016061078,0.000033964385,0.0002794188,0.0000048706406,0.000085671534,0.000038159716,0.000020439395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000718994,0.000033204706,0.00006408908,0.000081870305,0.0016878064,0.00007823936,0.000040414063,0.000030727617,7.49554e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020079131,0.00010706814,0.13360552,0.000058014255,0.00013320186,9.352706e-7,0.018932922,0.0000010488852,0.007661095,0.83748215,0.00009888651,0.0018990904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001024004,0.00036204612,0.42455843,0.0010983736,0.00028633096,0.000019452082,0.006053376,0.000019160812,0.004573045,0.55929315,0.0024108824,0.0003017255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042470653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.189011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2909529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004335628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000095726966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96390563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336613538","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511511035.020","title":"Legislatures as Constitutional Interpretation: Another Dialogue","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional interpretation; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.022267280956342554,"score_gpt":0.22858669998575276,"score_spread":0.2063194190294102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336613538","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000009462845,0.00056882453,0.001499385,0.0001502149,0.0006397073,0.00030813817,0.00033263725,0.00013923453,0.9963524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022293765,0.00015292128,0.00004608374,0.0002928,0.00073606166,0.0000012028523,0.000075261465,0.000011164836,0.9763907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870044,0.000055827175,0.00015837802,0.00036281388,0.00046291508,0.00025963224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992312,0.000107933745,0.00016300296,0.00015373327,0.00025256324,0.00009153725],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010802993,0.00025495092,0.0002924544,0.00011250876,0.0010750024,0.00006391363,0.00034480283,0.00036187132,0.000038915532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026698644,0.00029399022,0.0002197634,0.000012290001,0.004608082,0.000115555325,0.00015110779,0.00031339444,0.00007822472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005025314,0.000006890854,0.0000056284325,0.0000051648035,0.00010379888,0.00011558495,0.00011319715,0.0000066885195,0.000001880774,0.83895737,0.16033821,0.00029535452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022134397,0.000016270486,0.000019563982,0.00010618271,0.00012234897,0.0000042317965,0.000091206086,0.0000021644298,0.00000716997,0.0008720003,0.9982087,0.00032884438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008686654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039792492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83808535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003079306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007145669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336865386","doi":"","title":"A 'Hard Core' Case against Judicial Review","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.12585944301690638,"score_gpt":0.34521050879876347,"score_spread":0.2193510657818571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336865386","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.071601324,0.013512182,0.000037123355,0.006697006,0.00034122288,0.00024603918,0.0000056671215,0.000118134616,0.9074413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93471026,0.053022172,0.000126188,0.009228553,0.0005864367,0.000018166227,0.0000018379714,0.000002847007,0.0023035347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923426,0.000039589766,0.00013897479,0.00012564055,0.0002632726,0.000198267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966127,0.000051250543,0.000032971348,0.00006169575,0.00010568581,0.00008714267],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022851425,0.000064618514,0.00015091739,0.000017234956,0.0015441902,0.0000066869516,0.00008459178,0.000031303556,0.00048545343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002556619,0.000053490447,0.00007308665,0.00023840538,0.00070501975,0.00007445185,0.000032726475,0.00005963223,0.0003802217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000080354785,0.00008856652,0.0049509946,0.000029157589,0.000048673402,0.003720931,0.002822069,6.045688e-7,0.00002082901,0.7154116,0.25620702,0.016691498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014029341,0.000018699116,0.0016740286,0.00017681309,0.000027345513,0.00024779703,0.0009844367,0.0000013242095,0.0000057476204,0.004834001,0.99169004,0.00019950063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012424138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046610464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9051378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045284058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024108392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337162619","doi":"10.1093/icon/mow056","title":"The republican virtues of the “new commonwealth model of constitutionalism”","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Commonwealth; Democracy; Politics; Legislature; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Separation of powers; Sociology; Public administration; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03226949416544197,"score_gpt":0.3184463081912751,"score_spread":0.28617681402583317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337162619","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030845806,0.002991598,0.05800459,0.29590496,0.009859578,0.00057318975,0.0008079583,0.00004022316,0.6009721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974609,0.0005499364,0.0003777171,0.00053756405,0.0005629092,0.0000022759086,9.4592093e-7,0.0000024798344,0.0005052875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99715513,0.00015018001,0.0007928394,0.000103790524,0.0016206448,0.00017739739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957567,0.00083353184,0.000901786,0.00013466888,0.0022619772,0.00011133512],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011241405,0.00010599754,0.00022638732,0.00007137375,0.00070936617,0.00003787826,0.0011064047,0.000063509324,0.00008888506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012675608,0.00005242433,0.00028844023,0.00015722275,0.013497491,0.0003741101,0.00013916248,0.00013802493,0.0000027498152],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011146688,0.000058545607,0.0021197118,0.0000011311823,0.0002094504,0.0000018402063,0.00015000305,0.00027452316,0.0006733952,0.9912327,0.0036069755,0.0015602898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075672416,0.000033160744,0.0010711061,0.00026969498,0.000042537366,0.000041989904,0.00022330885,0.000012970031,0.0012107702,0.5637487,0.43248785,0.00010115697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010502557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001278016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9666151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021760946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004875524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9891872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337861405","doi":"","title":"Review of Donald R. Songer, 'The Transformation of the Supreme Court of Canada: An Empirical Examination' (University of Toronto Press, 2008)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Normative; Law; Political science; Legitimacy; Perspective (graphical); Majority opinion; Politics","score_opus":0.018678862371328445,"score_gpt":0.2624736960644274,"score_spread":0.24379483369309896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337861405","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2595361,0.5880845,0.0018793818,0.07416003,0.0004006363,0.0011093087,0.00007778276,0.000013584334,0.07473866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8981226,0.10168014,0.0000061777705,0.00007972945,0.000034639554,1.4472825e-7,6.4726726e-7,8.185944e-7,0.00007510916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987827,0.00020521149,0.00021067052,0.00004499889,0.00046296752,0.00029342956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929523,0.000039089122,0.0002573546,0.00006265678,0.0003206648,0.000025027904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015225579,0.000044811906,0.00015363103,0.0000056876625,0.00032256768,0.0000017721662,0.00027924604,0.000026531545,0.00003956383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006790767,0.00003041681,0.0000777318,0.00008551322,0.0002613521,0.00017986637,0.000008411007,0.000173345,4.584604e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008537229,0.00027920827,0.0018561683,0.00016898675,0.00024306549,3.7582123e-7,0.012538784,0.00004329174,0.00025525008,0.9143067,0.007770394,0.062452376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019213445,0.0013416236,0.4034376,0.0032338037,0.00089150126,0.000045627097,0.08366727,0.00012615648,0.0007721644,0.21760322,0.28640562,0.000554041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48310494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94176304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6967035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004757804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004520065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8018402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338262209","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Law Meets Comparative Politics: Socio-Economic Rights and Political Realities (Chapter 10)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Dignity; Social rights; Welfare state; Fundamental rights; Politics; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04422301124317664,"score_gpt":0.300364009384181,"score_spread":0.2561409981410044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338262209","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06322374,0.002090124,0.00019393387,0.0031887372,0.0003035052,0.000117925025,0.000036797122,0.000041226125,0.930804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974727,0.00046677713,0.000050341063,0.00024060423,0.00075127307,0.000004431253,0.0000024293308,0.0000027986052,0.0010086225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758965,0.000112330505,0.00024053385,0.00017053637,0.00022712804,0.0016598336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945074,0.000096354815,0.00008123287,0.000051047475,0.00011588108,0.00020473413],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006708301,0.0001379196,0.00021909745,0.00003647504,0.0022328575,0.00005556527,0.00014807735,0.00008164267,0.0005443412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018753433,0.00012001596,0.00008513157,0.00002594634,0.0055486,0.0002743601,0.00003962648,0.000483814,0.00013103012],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020954856,0.000022632541,0.00048711267,6.2150735e-7,0.00014524709,0.0000029952093,0.0023439517,2.2183784e-7,0.0000010965645,0.99682754,0.00008711266,0.00006051681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023949886,0.00007646338,0.0002145717,0.00001014732,0.000035117606,0.000081844286,0.014007383,0.000001197365,0.0000123790305,0.92645466,0.058719184,0.0001475234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03736458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034952044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.934249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009472894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017262354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339527732","doi":"","title":"Les Droits Économiques Et Sociaux Dans Les Relations État–Particuliers Après Trente Ans D’Interprétation : Normes Juridiques Ou Énoncés Juridiques Symboliques? (Economic and Social Rights in the State-Individuals Relations after Thirty Years of Interpretation: Legal Norms or Symbolic Legal Statements)","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017546334607629645,"score_gpt":0.3071869279879842,"score_spread":0.2896405933803545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339527732","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9578331,0.0036780753,0.0016206763,0.022894515,0.00035178964,0.0004754451,0.00022405449,0.00004615442,0.012876199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914817,0.0046093664,0.00011214215,0.00012276521,0.00047008137,0.00008062593,0.0000448808,0.0000229611,0.0030554526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955166,0.0012197762,0.0011250668,0.00040230784,0.00041995017,0.0013163032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983578,0.00051176373,0.0007470575,0.000111538066,0.00019555188,0.00007631616],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024973084,0.00037372854,0.00052896014,0.00026709304,0.0015280164,0.0003514024,0.00034299755,0.00023661798,0.00008232326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007086927,0.00031190773,0.00027866728,0.00030943932,0.0014412154,0.0021030896,0.00006989125,0.0015317388,0.00002055973],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017012896,0.00020867439,0.022583215,0.0000144587875,0.00038800025,0.000010012227,0.04932601,0.00029522294,0.000007669813,0.9186739,0.0003199053,0.0080028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095710997,0.0004972508,0.19227207,0.00026061558,0.00040451187,0.00006390675,0.032191414,0.0001862718,0.00004029005,0.7501466,0.02239226,0.00058770116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056392934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5175987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46120578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021380123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004186944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339673233","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Litigation, the Adversarial System and Some of Its Adverse Effects","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Law; Supreme court; Common law; Political science; Impossibility; Obligation","score_opus":0.016434452626865926,"score_gpt":0.2615906456626325,"score_spread":0.24515619303576658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339673233","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32003334,0.006780664,0.0006771285,0.0037692534,0.0045982627,0.0008913058,0.000029103605,0.00012666332,0.6630943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99886584,0.00007167949,0.000030988806,0.0001195351,0.00078194553,0.000011719987,9.4193047e-7,6.9485355e-7,0.000116650495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936134,0.00008576003,0.00010322319,0.000059924903,0.00024090585,0.00014883961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995247,0.00024621747,0.00004417652,0.00003411218,0.00008932377,0.0000614742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040703706,0.000047550297,0.00008431104,0.000011196342,0.0006944848,0.0000067248184,0.000059347458,0.00003538673,0.000030953906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021017533,0.000030968964,0.000030808624,0.00008598765,0.0017447653,0.0002560961,0.000033374872,0.000034919845,0.000032929736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005021354,0.000012031466,0.0069260667,0.00001295402,0.000022173912,2.3545765e-7,0.0011735406,0.0000014570103,0.000037686532,0.9913438,0.00027953097,0.00018552132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00344211,0.00014581245,0.29247308,0.00061575486,0.00053924875,0.000024721914,0.07948764,0.00007122707,0.0039819567,0.051298484,0.5669345,0.00098545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00093178434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000099645484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9400453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040383125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000117432275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6428661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340277123","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.12272","title":"The Environmental Revolution and the Supreme Court of Canada: Empirical Analysis of Postmaterialist Value Change Across Four Decades*","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of the Pacific","keywords":"Supreme court; Value (mathematics); Logistic regression; Law; Environmental change; Relevance (law); Political science; Economics; Climate change; Statistics","score_opus":0.030829361361166766,"score_gpt":0.30778938191153193,"score_spread":0.27696002055036517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2340277123","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9784147,0.00019244036,0.000040698247,0.0192099,0.0002854436,0.00018829585,0.0001280903,0.0000058167266,0.0015345812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995731,0.00006608017,0.0000041084836,0.00011663196,0.00017833855,0.000013453052,5.1154177e-7,0.0000014519761,0.00004628808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982421,0.00019308162,0.00022174275,0.00016417996,0.0008374646,0.0003414351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993703,0.00024478324,0.00016568524,0.00008184856,0.000077703626,0.000059728674],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019538305,0.000068860936,0.00019715574,0.000026095504,0.0032364347,0.000041525564,0.00034174483,0.00003787291,0.000012906872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012958761,0.000034166034,0.00007938903,0.00058366865,0.011028025,0.00018062445,0.000036914902,0.00003437319,6.66207e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021749573,0.000052470536,0.10102065,0.0000035608684,0.00030791253,0.0000015783748,0.14375204,2.4056285e-7,0.004952959,0.71849823,0.0005457185,0.030647162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036426977,0.00006363147,0.9548111,0.0000092381015,0.00014543862,4.0131195e-7,0.030369999,0.000015068805,0.0000736026,0.011141033,0.0028943568,0.0001118601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41127947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5193768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85379046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024575685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042712633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99806124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340976075","doi":"","title":"NOT FOR RELEASE, PUBLICATION OR DISTRIBUTION, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, IN OR INTO AUSTRALIA, CANADA, JAPAN, SOUTH AFRICA, THE UNITED STATES OR ANY OTHER JURISDICTION WHERE IT IS UNLAWFUL TO DISTRIBUTE THIS ANNOUNCEMENT","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Distribution (mathematics); Geography; Political science; History; Law","score_opus":0.049983243728696496,"score_gpt":0.3038526702326011,"score_spread":0.2538694265039046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2340976075","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6661698,0.00013041301,0.002434195,0.31022128,0.00087728054,0.00603558,0.008304652,0.00024099983,0.0055858074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.945678,0.00012152674,0.00007345811,0.0032972142,0.00020917664,0.0008970616,0.0005159306,0.0000143674515,0.049193297],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972636,0.00029655237,0.0006657724,0.000478888,0.0006197675,0.0006753995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983696,0.0006174048,0.00019111871,0.00021344812,0.0004322091,0.0001762298],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013211123,0.00025108244,0.00034870717,0.00014817454,0.0007247277,0.00016426903,0.000369028,0.00013869189,0.0014159322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001859697,0.00013727372,0.00004224521,0.0026880743,0.00029062456,0.00027588423,0.00008230244,0.00018111986,0.00003277776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004493353,0.00043854755,0.055484895,0.0000636889,0.00010169132,0.000011649226,0.046965912,0.00020406663,0.000018342067,0.012897484,0.87551767,0.0038027032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000758051,0.0002002015,0.012856207,0.000120745906,0.000022872884,4.3224594e-7,0.01527605,0.00017195311,0.00006521474,0.00047449252,0.9697668,0.00028700338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8937073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99622357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30692405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013726329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016691744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99949694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341109914","doi":"","title":"Review of Flemming, Tournament of Appeals: Granting Judicial Review in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Justice System Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tournament; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02543149587765181,"score_gpt":0.29593373684636304,"score_spread":0.2705022409687112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341109914","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010503115,0.90829074,0.000110769324,0.0069709565,0.0018555797,0.00091001764,0.000009563467,0.0000095881005,0.07133966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73928034,0.2592958,0.00007406213,0.0008833571,0.0004341924,0.000011585221,3.5218844e-7,0.0000035140165,0.000016779288],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756956,0.00033533794,0.0010119383,0.00009082174,0.000728566,0.0002637468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983399,0.00013778698,0.00079783343,0.00007052695,0.0005481884,0.00010575144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002123181,0.0000905078,0.00055190723,0.000047242767,0.00031003144,0.000011819454,0.00023278638,0.000024835917,0.00017058483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00086174405,0.00007271097,0.000097387645,0.00034280968,0.00010620696,0.00012363479,0.00003550882,0.00017289525,0.000008556411],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003012445,0.000258128,0.034245525,0.35280612,0.00053950323,0.00022195728,0.0055242027,0.00007330887,0.00022315414,0.13622148,0.3452927,0.124563806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006093331,0.00007391571,0.008409347,0.82310903,0.0013457251,0.00015237826,0.06392666,0.000026498885,0.000024707384,0.0006859483,0.1011598,0.000476662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89483285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63653207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7287772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005790295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023873164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42349967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344266823","doi":"10.5040/9781472559555.ch-005","title":"‘Alert, alive and sensitive’: Baker, the Duty to Give Reasons, and the Ethos of Justification in Canadian Public Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Duty; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.038245170695469725,"score_gpt":0.25317425682789657,"score_spread":0.21492908613242684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344266823","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00050521916,0.0005039683,0.000014488889,0.054131705,0.00021489382,0.00059579284,0.00008528042,0.000017719834,0.9439309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94666016,0.00015034282,0.000029287503,0.0036899517,0.0003870072,0.00004005913,0.000014290598,0.000012886419,0.049016003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855727,0.00023545022,0.00023778915,0.0002902953,0.0003744727,0.0003047187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831444,0.00079231826,0.00016037915,0.00018134432,0.00034076994,0.00021076419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027697878,0.00015977073,0.00028454332,0.000119783406,0.0012256453,0.0006884643,0.0002633173,0.0002180616,0.000017430028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014654477,0.00010641426,0.00005142846,0.00004369246,0.0024943184,0.00021531079,0.00013105267,0.00037967597,0.000005741252],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011260232,0.0000011156587,0.00008431428,0.0000052228493,0.000030933283,0.0000021383999,0.0084813675,1.0732152e-7,0.0000012102532,0.9797626,0.005834525,0.0057852115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014243208,0.000007671653,0.001029492,0.00014347809,0.000038458464,0.0000024674873,0.0022063178,0.000003569721,0.0000016467749,0.047660477,0.94861925,0.00014474323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7444799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94971585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94615495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013929706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067254296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9426797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344632045","doi":"10.14288/1.0066683","title":"Doing provincial constitutions differently : codifying responsible government in the era of executive dominance","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dominance (genetics); Government (linguistics); Political science; Public administration; Business","score_opus":0.01619889631510298,"score_gpt":0.2098233913933695,"score_spread":0.1936244950782665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344632045","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95636743,0.00029309953,0.00027177145,0.00044157033,0.000089223664,0.00027276177,0.00012900181,0.000012511025,0.042122636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99901974,0.0005468561,0.00022712325,0.000032675358,0.000030781364,0.000001340491,0.0000013014406,0.0000016067639,0.00013855039],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989043,0.0001459007,0.000116896954,0.00016455508,0.00048295516,0.0001853786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949217,0.00016496186,0.00011363623,0.00008544904,0.00010919938,0.00003457161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030978175,0.00003005525,0.0001833749,0.000014057491,0.0012920846,0.000020144476,0.00026169416,0.000051454816,0.00001990892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000118057345,0.00007436532,0.000075702555,0.0003270031,0.0024335936,0.00018802474,0.000079529986,0.00013239359,0.000002770903],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032546,0.0015844726,0.47586143,0.00008679408,0.0002511559,0.0012452535,0.07994176,0.000050715364,0.0008382048,0.042811602,0.006660207,0.39034295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004942363,0.000032517226,0.9691529,0.00015205234,0.000021472832,0.000011906517,0.026271917,0.000003076852,0.0000016965284,0.001092489,0.0026767459,0.000088942266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44926962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8172491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49329153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000148889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005487363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9937801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344845538","doi":"","title":"Remedies for Discriminatory Profiling","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Racial profiling; Profiling (computer programming); Legislature; Damages; Enforcement; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.023342375266797614,"score_gpt":0.31244716812556683,"score_spread":0.2891047928587692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344845538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38375637,0.06711396,0.04848004,0.11345593,0.0037244575,0.0017749968,0.000013424692,0.00041161742,0.3812692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933423,0.0041146907,0.00015379945,0.0002415111,0.0011377569,0.0000059444064,7.903255e-7,0.0000029221035,0.0010002945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981943,0.000039208135,0.00012854642,0.00009392353,0.00023251661,0.0013115531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968404,0.000046410245,0.00006058496,0.00003286709,0.0001240231,0.000052083007],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014316499,0.000065781205,0.00009941524,0.00003837937,0.001482779,0.000035331854,0.00014606559,0.000037906673,0.000005203078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026842824,0.00005501756,0.00008782806,0.00008712475,0.00017534518,0.00014634673,0.0000075069784,0.0003928612,0.0000061129663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018789462,0.00001870006,0.00034299612,5.656649e-7,0.000024480398,4.814459e-7,0.0006704502,9.733634e-7,0.00007385909,0.97101057,0.00015255238,0.027685588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015877048,0.00013683968,0.00045744434,0.000009645052,0.000020918667,0.0000070980727,0.014562748,0.0000015555997,0.00004621201,0.962651,0.021866042,0.000081709135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016859846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031502936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60958594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005148426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021340614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345260285","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.2014.e33","title":"What Do Meaningful Consequences and Fair and Proportionate Accountability Mean to Youth Offered Extrajudicial Sanctions in Ontario?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Brock University; Centennial College","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Accountability; Economic Justice; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Exploratory research; Perception; Criminology; Criminal justice; Public relations; Process (computing); Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.13621275310942998,"score_gpt":0.3201981316282285,"score_spread":0.18398537851879854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345260285","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98330337,0.002351262,0.00028282194,0.011174723,0.0007520361,0.00022939006,0.000031614705,0.00001532177,0.0018594828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953643,0.0026517513,0.0005064758,0.001151633,0.00022852965,0.000017270495,0.0000016694856,0.000011628895,0.00006671762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99731493,0.0004417336,0.0005666294,0.00044071124,0.00013790173,0.001098072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970227,0.00084293383,0.00025325431,0.00014206763,0.00047579777,0.0012632465],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00183105,0.00026915854,0.0005004437,0.00050262443,0.0009150238,0.0001896993,0.0003055078,0.00033445653,0.000085303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035880653,0.00023713859,0.000063613574,0.00011892729,0.0039637494,0.0006666425,0.00006241683,0.0005875504,0.0000023276916],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044345215,0.000066766814,0.058169108,0.00030657987,0.00013779898,0.0017591302,0.38446805,0.000036873043,0.00060477026,0.521955,0.0001291317,0.031923342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006945287,0.00042674638,0.2373519,0.00068618736,0.0023861208,0.0013603249,0.6963888,0.0000025279032,0.000045286375,0.057788733,0.0024392584,0.0004296293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5127632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98092175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4681585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014147634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061947685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345497868","doi":"","title":"Exporting U.S. Counter-Interpretation: Redeeming Constitutional Supremacy in the U.K.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Parliamentary sovereignty; Political science; Constitution; Judicial review; Separation of powers; Constitutional review; Democracy; Popular sovereignty; Legislature; Sovereignty; Politics","score_opus":0.016088925947602913,"score_gpt":0.2934452861968933,"score_spread":0.2773563602492904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345497868","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4280833,0.010233047,0.06859611,0.084272645,0.0017955935,0.0006001645,0.000010608966,0.000106886124,0.40630165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99639934,0.0022715284,0.000015803207,0.00031992252,0.00064553565,0.0000092329865,4.587927e-7,0.000002429859,0.00033575593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977908,0.00018054398,0.00027842008,0.0001245877,0.00047519032,0.0011504308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939823,0.00026914614,0.00013026009,0.000056292825,0.00011008003,0.000035974525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035798212,0.000081917366,0.000108692606,0.00005813825,0.0010896196,0.000064665765,0.00028987176,0.000039833365,0.00008068872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055124186,0.000046719746,0.00007590016,0.00018526215,0.0009528411,0.00031877853,0.00002153126,0.00046948367,0.00003453236],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002032219,0.000017546829,0.012018315,3.7293066e-7,0.000024312782,0.0000061979877,0.002004783,0.0000021718413,0.000049709248,0.9697856,0.00010668486,0.015964022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048127878,0.000049425762,0.0029391071,0.00012024842,0.000016609038,0.00017572983,0.030777525,0.000004086809,0.000008480853,0.930459,0.034820355,0.00014810458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00064382795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012403247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56831604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009181228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032013955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8380583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346217348","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-121x.2004.tb00251.x","title":"Judges and politics: an essay from Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law; Supreme court; Government (linguistics); Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029224881557690305,"score_gpt":0.2996854901820406,"score_spread":0.2704606086243503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346217348","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9127507,0.011420286,0.0000058567466,0.02104122,0.00046723598,0.00007753419,0.00003878641,0.000046145396,0.054152243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99715436,0.00068824005,0.00008191349,0.0011711143,0.00067260023,0.000007849034,0.0000019748632,0.0000026390353,0.00021930564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924725,0.000032764943,0.00009103474,0.00015427175,0.00024776376,0.00022688706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996716,0.000080501726,0.000023557292,0.00004943717,0.00009028342,0.000084629006],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008002926,0.00008051368,0.00014800699,0.000010997741,0.0013914283,0.000038419166,0.00007918382,0.000023978791,0.000013787999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017374144,0.00006800862,0.000015410431,0.000068633846,0.00072697515,0.0001485926,0.00006184282,0.000056601177,0.0000048112606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003148705,0.00001973272,0.01878798,0.000002099968,0.00011701237,0.000023800294,0.010537743,0.0000064111687,0.0000068652644,0.9685246,0.0009874447,0.0009831731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039628922,0.000046676512,0.09701069,0.00003570807,0.000056949804,9.688081e-7,0.07162753,2.6025282e-7,0.00008167233,0.3743743,0.456057,0.00031194004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99135333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9948208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5941503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031411563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068374624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2350929018","doi":"","title":"A Comparative Study on the Federal Judicial Systems of the U.S.A and Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of China University of Geosciences(Social Sciences Edition)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Federalism; Judicial review; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.02887351365440918,"score_gpt":0.2601874922803068,"score_spread":0.23131397862589761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2350929018","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97561175,0.0000482371,0.000050414783,0.01086376,0.0011639724,0.00018857633,0.000015201014,0.0000023049242,0.012055762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995478,0.000021957701,0.0000112906555,0.00007038179,0.00031794698,1.404875e-7,5.6642484e-8,6.060356e-7,0.000029827712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977495,0.0002612172,0.00021117883,0.00011433827,0.0014864024,0.00017734649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886054,0.00018086871,0.0005696535,0.000040308107,0.0002953473,0.000053297692],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001367525,0.0000732212,0.00023932308,0.00006026444,0.0049135988,0.00004705511,0.00069211615,0.00002710256,0.000012561126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016435339,0.000044446893,0.0000763323,0.0006837793,0.0053697866,0.00030503623,0.00008218901,0.00014868432,3.1741004e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012162277,0.0006359779,0.083202995,0.000008172931,0.00012684941,0.000021753629,0.108755045,0.0014112527,0.00009933312,0.7989471,0.006440526,0.00022935618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005087796,0.00051756564,0.65396595,0.000086438275,0.00004660589,0.0000047657772,0.32767943,0.000006097793,0.000022911077,0.014519997,0.0025315045,0.00010998028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73120993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69252425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7844271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019647958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027272804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99733704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2357867310","doi":"","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada in the Twenty-First Century","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Charter; Legitimacy; Original jurisdiction; Institution; Legislature; Certiorari; Statutory interpretation; Tribunal","score_opus":0.00981025391046497,"score_gpt":0.24125731973537992,"score_spread":0.23144706582491495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2357867310","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5847109,0.040832017,0.00010955696,0.17168805,0.0014466108,0.00039104774,0.0000047360704,0.000013824605,0.20080325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96386355,0.035289284,7.0878787e-7,0.00017454459,0.00030381486,0.0000027111212,1.9024668e-7,0.0000018126575,0.00036336028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979814,0.00013577874,0.00016512087,0.000058250705,0.0005150848,0.0011443261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995739,0.00018429536,0.00008006689,0.000056756322,0.000075155935,0.000029825684],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002324767,0.00005454775,0.00007810861,0.000016315153,0.0017801112,0.000029819439,0.0003867049,0.000021694032,0.00001525555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015445166,0.000030173615,0.00004348735,0.000232514,0.00027271782,0.00005583042,0.000017330654,0.00055810437,0.0000015890292],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019727482,0.000021815747,0.016361365,3.2122887e-7,0.000036861984,0.0000048190204,0.0014131285,0.000014507264,0.0000014029835,0.9775379,0.0016218831,0.0029663122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001778668,0.00003441245,0.0114925895,0.000011101468,0.000011227987,0.00003688096,0.05445104,0.000002012827,0.0000010404693,0.2886777,0.6450378,0.00006638115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.60833377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99695325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6888602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008257844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067927856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2368594978","doi":"10.1093/icon/mov048","title":"Proportionality and Constitutional Culture","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Political science; Law","score_opus":0.049977583296387545,"score_gpt":0.3510176951362327,"score_spread":0.30104011183984514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2368594978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0119184945,0.004821475,0.036221147,0.027045593,0.008143582,0.000306245,0.0001957741,0.000075495765,0.91127217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947872,0.00023666176,0.0016167123,0.0012528561,0.0018531834,0.0000042602405,0.000014381734,0.0000022111449,0.00023250104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973714,0.00011478001,0.00051300816,0.0001521806,0.001660129,0.00018852245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959977,0.00010982044,0.00032674414,0.00005133742,0.0031920953,0.0003222734],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011271641,0.00012967832,0.00021488374,0.00010722903,0.00047946826,0.00012618615,0.0003408294,0.000097798,0.00012793625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008985755,0.00011116165,0.00011946428,0.00012156018,0.022050232,0.000738494,0.00008235603,0.00021983104,0.000032680648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000114322174,0.00009967681,0.005841804,0.0000012522486,0.00017659517,0.000101411766,0.0005136579,0.000065778135,0.000027919235,0.9884306,0.004205857,0.0004210781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000742881,0.000039674862,0.0004679875,0.00005028386,0.000029012443,0.00041534414,0.0007431959,0.0000028800298,0.000029912975,0.28791106,0.7094444,0.00012334641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003334306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013117767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98286873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032309088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028412438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9806112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W237856110","doi":"","title":"It's All in the Game: A Nonfoundationalist Account of Law and Adjudication by Allan C. Hutchinson (review)","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Law; Mathematical economics; Law and economics; Philosophy; History; Sociology; Mathematics; Political science","score_opus":0.022044596727169418,"score_gpt":0.27809984534548005,"score_spread":0.25605524861831064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W237856110","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14918867,0.030891864,0.0002949977,0.043373037,0.00012588188,0.00072287343,0.00007279669,0.00002169291,0.7753082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988476,0.010542543,0.000027247292,0.0008093453,0.000020797977,3.5953332e-7,0.000011569379,7.844354e-7,0.00011137018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946064,0.000080799764,0.00008590181,0.00008118978,0.000214859,0.00007660098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997145,0.000057284695,0.000080706384,0.00005787377,0.00006911981,0.000020548974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027009912,0.00004127727,0.00010168183,0.0000067925926,0.00015229068,0.0000054295115,0.00015818916,0.000025657022,0.00018596121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010088784,0.000038191538,0.000027950493,0.00003325934,0.00042586576,0.00020584407,0.000008431472,0.00002677119,0.0000030126043],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076078206,0.0003317733,0.0056965137,0.00007003928,0.00009099263,0.00000800492,0.17575724,8.8596704e-7,0.00016335821,0.7594055,0.034867704,0.0235319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002386698,0.000084527965,0.02369417,0.00008936981,0.000032666452,8.088997e-7,0.023299886,0.000003935197,5.415988e-7,0.001892942,0.9505934,0.000069063724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43694472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.52048373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9157257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007608778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043648943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5668047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2385483180","doi":"","title":"Study of Canadian Judicial Review","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Parliament; Appeal; Constitution; Judicial activism; Law; Political science; Constitutional theory; Politics","score_opus":0.06829207427028373,"score_gpt":0.3323798138437884,"score_spread":0.2640877395735047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2385483180","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.065091975,0.0027995275,0.000002512761,0.009662619,0.00014835932,0.00030595768,0.0000017951982,0.000015899242,0.9219714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99575627,0.0030486214,0.000016582762,0.0009773059,0.00009030199,0.000006391337,2.3570927e-7,8.451907e-7,0.000103459315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995157,0.000023788638,0.000097159114,0.00006047271,0.0001853697,0.00011748818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997832,0.000009731899,0.000019468367,0.000037838916,0.00007425003,0.000075483185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001901543,0.000029771962,0.000095983414,0.0000642415,0.00036616865,0.0000035349276,0.00008200719,0.0000133719395,0.0001928474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010112287,0.000025110985,0.000021237543,0.0004909344,0.00015068668,0.00003370284,0.000010154893,0.000024875935,0.000044995442],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.41658e-7,0.00009627548,0.0038178887,0.0000050717535,0.000018908444,0.000007663021,0.0041119,0.0000022234121,8.6584356e-7,0.9875894,0.0029573755,0.001391546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091149524,0.00032231395,0.06607475,0.00060558115,0.00013683893,0.0000012386602,0.06272119,2.4187816e-8,0.000018303108,0.09607569,0.7727872,0.0003453435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9816494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9940482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9306643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000630735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059893174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28163102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2387780781","doi":"10.21991/c9qh45","title":"Distant Echoes: Discussing Judicial Activism at Canadian and American Supreme Court Nomination Hearings","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nomination; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Judicial activism; Supreme Court Decisions; Judicial review","score_opus":0.01779949315408676,"score_gpt":0.26522840769486056,"score_spread":0.2474289145407738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2387780781","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24905042,0.0014907772,0.05633771,0.31092325,0.0060505006,0.0022586908,0.0016796578,0.00071247254,0.37149653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99705637,0.00035210905,0.000254117,0.0012182134,0.0004001877,0.00007803894,0.00004009317,0.000011976677,0.0005888779],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967475,0.000123322,0.000493873,0.00069634116,0.00073762506,0.001201325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998136,0.00031397803,0.00022362101,0.00021990573,0.0003699812,0.00073654094],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053647545,0.00036930077,0.00043359448,0.00033781887,0.007028024,0.00016986532,0.00029129305,0.00017654659,0.0002380442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082812645,0.00029032564,0.00016855057,0.00047268218,0.023781314,0.0010014497,0.00021949664,0.00018897207,0.00019690715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006367788,0.000042623524,0.06926813,0.0000036906147,0.00006989086,0.000027461674,0.00032233898,0.0000075161684,0.00039056252,0.9199564,0.0031848708,0.0066628573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015800976,0.0000939799,0.024952145,0.00037544462,0.00011647372,0.00014032172,0.006450441,0.000043229586,0.0001961106,0.09338436,0.87159175,0.0010756244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12071058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43874806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8684069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022430455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037381097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2391225639","doi":"","title":"Distinctive Canadian Constitutional Law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Legal Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Sovereign immunity; Monarchy; Law of the land; Law; Sovereignty; Independence (probability theory); Political science; Colonialism; Limited government; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03735897709457897,"score_gpt":0.2930902631015614,"score_spread":0.2557312860069824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2391225639","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010560473,0.00034085725,0.00039158564,0.0099997865,0.00076536124,0.000188362,0.000032080658,0.0000664464,0.97765505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997587,0.000006752631,0.000106664535,0.0017629862,0.00026099922,0.0000124378075,0.0000030227175,0.0000017573693,0.00025837324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842566,0.00003055904,0.00014284733,0.00030231898,0.00063423516,0.00046434856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905753,0.00003697879,0.000041727322,0.000097020966,0.00026515016,0.0005016122],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006759654,0.0000957904,0.00011123233,0.00009003718,0.0046853325,0.00018446673,0.00043212916,0.000042496213,0.000079048965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030378145,0.00008927507,0.0000450557,0.00073143234,0.022620536,0.0011798567,0.00005873016,0.00011686554,0.00019221129],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003953529,0.000015994234,0.0015403986,3.8117065e-7,0.0000039550737,0.00004025508,0.0006894829,0.000012362217,0.000048255315,0.9972096,0.00026898624,0.00016638095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002790248,0.000026926902,0.0075169504,0.000029269893,0.000003793274,0.0000062164563,0.0015698676,0.0000014159097,0.0001236101,0.12492909,0.86527896,0.00023488604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86003304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6637755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9870265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007611172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01508789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2404729571","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x16000234","title":"Just the Facts? Media Coverage of Female and Male High Court Appointees in Five Democracies","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Media coverage; Political science; Variation (astronomy); News media; Law; Sociology; Media studies","score_opus":0.05281048631499318,"score_gpt":0.3021888606153184,"score_spread":0.24937837430032522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2404729571","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8902046,0.00061870087,0.000106441985,0.0062475954,0.00020049309,0.0001063339,0.00008128679,0.0000111844765,0.10242334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971215,0.0005745815,0.000025098414,0.000292487,0.00017369869,0.000005513805,7.692803e-7,0.0000027854987,0.0018035575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923754,0.000063159605,0.0001299823,0.00010209111,0.00022513061,0.0002420916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993222,0.00044442943,0.000042930445,0.000064383166,0.00007548851,0.00005062046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002044396,0.00006425638,0.00011925904,0.000027992828,0.00028072044,0.000014379545,0.00010485793,0.000039869246,0.00023747835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029641856,0.0000381347,0.000026581676,0.000070159265,0.0011599533,0.00007300406,0.000065207765,0.000045536217,0.000024362667],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035945254,0.000020052783,0.06337101,0.0000049001574,0.000019554807,0.0000029226262,0.015591684,0.0000011233739,0.000041306048,0.91964644,0.0007632586,0.0005341622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036110144,0.000017039985,0.57596964,0.000038707385,0.000030819203,0.0000031877414,0.041958425,0.0000014436923,0.00024262416,0.3623958,0.018822566,0.0001586479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059618843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002579445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5572506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052232226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013409174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9012626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2408831168","doi":"","title":"Electoral Management Bodies as a Fourth Branch of Government","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Constitution; Political science; Government (linguistics); Legislature; Law; Separation of powers; Norm (philosophy); Public administration","score_opus":0.010023022971387808,"score_gpt":0.26080078757862507,"score_spread":0.2507777646072373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2408831168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6057803,0.009756349,0.011228227,0.021836463,0.0009308583,0.00045654556,0.000015687448,0.000070214206,0.34992534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9789968,0.013170985,0.000028782504,0.00007408017,0.00030959243,0.0000056364343,9.015482e-8,0.0000044195476,0.0074096173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770904,0.00007199812,0.0001882025,0.00011374691,0.0007124453,0.0012045519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996536,0.000047105335,0.000120344,0.000058258414,0.000062927014,0.000057805064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009825623,0.00008599033,0.00013765188,0.000029016219,0.000516623,0.00001767391,0.00020790916,0.000031799114,0.00009982871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007439688,0.000057072026,0.0000999455,0.0000936382,0.00029661844,0.00013199438,0.000044347467,0.00020751441,0.000045825745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046330493,0.000038440776,0.006656702,0.000001448763,0.00020093648,0.0000021426272,0.00028446477,4.780474e-7,0.00015331061,0.93276983,0.0002172492,0.05962865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005121123,0.00019247096,0.0037235182,0.000050487302,0.000044143675,0.000014906464,0.0038302785,1.3062203e-7,0.00015555939,0.93345255,0.057899054,0.00012482105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012163299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0144964885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37321648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011458021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078626204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8089381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2409954246","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2785017","title":"Is Rule of Law an Equilibrium Without Private Ordering?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vector Institute; Royal Ontario Museum; Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Private law; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Public law","score_opus":0.019725075020541685,"score_gpt":0.29730199848488903,"score_spread":0.27757692346434737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2409954246","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9318364,0.0015366462,0.002183393,0.0058240434,0.00027323148,0.00009621269,0.0000052618066,0.00004189785,0.058202863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99685585,0.0016139855,0.00005500198,0.00015414042,0.00043113064,0.0000018275703,1.6446708e-7,0.000006014653,0.00088190153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813795,0.00007831596,0.000181159,0.00011849466,0.0003391587,0.0011449056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957746,0.000029424345,0.00011358472,0.00007596764,0.00012324011,0.000080312646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010088364,0.000079026235,0.00014201655,0.000031395008,0.00046490488,0.000023340745,0.00024967553,0.000046548535,0.00009629048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006211608,0.000052821935,0.000070163485,0.00010048219,0.0005671412,0.0003272534,0.000038669605,0.00024907434,0.000027637549],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023853652,0.000029522767,0.00871344,7.334891e-7,0.000057833637,5.258774e-7,0.0006366916,3.4401066e-7,0.002051279,0.9822175,0.000016664595,0.006251606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032420713,0.00014663451,0.0009657029,0.00002872965,0.000018468983,0.000012738601,0.0011033693,6.500028e-7,0.00066798314,0.9601031,0.036514618,0.000113823466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026271115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008767938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.065019384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031116247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014954355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48927155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2414974256","doi":"","title":"Theorizing Legal Mobilization","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"22nd International Conference of Europeanists","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Mobilization; Political science; Law and economics; Political economy; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.12406322628256536,"score_gpt":0.34436253063683836,"score_spread":0.220299304354273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2414974256","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041956563,0.00006337541,0.0012518239,0.001266512,0.00084143935,0.00006527296,0.000008618883,0.000035390298,0.954511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99700683,0.00009202295,0.00019870812,0.00010795155,0.0003107509,0.0000025218421,0.000008891706,0.0000038424073,0.002268449],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990741,0.00009431607,0.00016723659,0.00011997953,0.00043868646,0.00010569159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893796,0.000029459557,0.000089377674,0.00005691416,0.0008162453,0.00007003467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041488104,0.000059517235,0.00008175975,0.00004362499,0.0001363101,0.000069960515,0.00028244263,0.000020739788,0.00030059196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057621417,0.00005640846,0.00003271803,0.000096678785,0.00037476755,0.0002742432,0.00007252225,0.000050141163,0.00010596505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017042768,0.000028319273,0.0023291998,7.6104175e-7,0.000015044403,0.0000036335437,0.0013365976,0.000008985888,0.00026341956,0.99372894,0.000739534,0.0015285155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005197688,0.000101926606,0.0056273784,0.000080369115,0.000017095475,0.0000038222265,0.008456198,0.00024369407,0.00044570904,0.10682757,0.8774204,0.0002560514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013917143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003322488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9550503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057223864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002900762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3291271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2427534200","doi":"","title":"Judicial Justices of the Peace and Judicial Independence in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial independence; Judicial discretion; Political science; Judicial activism; Independence (probability theory); Law; Judicial opinion; Judicial review; Supreme court","score_opus":0.017159913701367168,"score_gpt":0.257490429631226,"score_spread":0.24033051592985882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2427534200","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9717307,0.007114846,0.000042706295,0.004471227,0.00066415395,0.00009921291,0.0000028870322,0.0000035405944,0.015870735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970537,0.0023759978,0.0000040352065,0.00011274031,0.0003774453,0.0000014218466,9.9356164e-8,0.0000024544565,0.0000720936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980693,0.00014624724,0.00019042249,0.000092690156,0.0006554472,0.0008458992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955374,0.000063173204,0.0001298465,0.000042756164,0.00013511177,0.00007535784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016225505,0.00006703582,0.00013475753,0.000031945867,0.00044031648,0.000016550397,0.00025423706,0.000039418268,0.000006626454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045992827,0.00004976185,0.000026233714,0.0002534697,0.00035906426,0.00011545597,0.00006144723,0.00072323496,9.120523e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055689918,0.000024721754,0.23086388,0.0000018530113,0.00004486338,0.00000562373,0.0030602822,0.000060797724,0.0000149187035,0.7557844,0.00034635927,0.009736595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008071374,0.00009684096,0.093767904,0.0000641877,0.00006127476,0.000052641353,0.14238708,0.000015790254,0.000022792381,0.75622755,0.0062809046,0.00021589758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9803266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99932307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1393268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016323392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03755004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9679062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W243986444","doi":"","title":"Democracy and Deference: The Role of Social Science Evidence in Election Law Cases","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Supreme court; Deference; Skepticism; Parliament; Politics","score_opus":0.02607675616260652,"score_gpt":0.28192224417869344,"score_spread":0.2558454880160869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W243986444","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7084447,0.0006974769,0.0000475922,0.0016681558,0.000046822694,0.00007271607,9.3149316e-7,0.000008878565,0.28901273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99953204,0.00028939173,0.00003994153,0.000016584843,0.000025949905,9.664898e-8,6.164747e-8,5.857829e-7,0.000095317584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994568,0.00007300578,0.00003745439,0.00009551962,0.00022299937,0.00011417403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961996,0.00015008652,0.00005965729,0.000039591516,0.00010628148,0.000024437963],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004511162,0.000035053898,0.000086674816,0.000014420934,0.0013237994,0.000008713578,0.00016933879,0.000025714424,0.00019180097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015305592,0.000032565422,0.000021316015,0.00012381129,0.002328531,0.00042965525,0.00007266777,0.00003596565,0.0000011501584],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002651756,0.0000151376735,0.0123469755,0.000002796228,0.0000044087565,4.0159668e-7,0.03033497,7.26023e-7,0.0010108125,0.9320552,0.000014244651,0.024187809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014150814,0.00007335223,0.85467243,0.000041805237,0.000024413455,8.0109623e-7,0.12424682,0.00004718607,0.00014956523,0.016603854,0.003906605,0.000091659655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.683313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5779057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91545135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010859659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012107724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2441399703","doi":"10.1017/9781316875056.009","title":"Two Conceptions of Pluralist Jurisprudence","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Content (measure theory); Political science; Law; Computer science; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04903365023970794,"score_gpt":0.2795815063435999,"score_spread":0.23054785610389197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2441399703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007910457,0.00028545974,0.00005066541,0.00009675479,0.00033063974,0.00022204858,0.00034079162,0.000051229905,0.9985433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.053649217,0.0005210497,0.000028100067,0.000026577216,0.00027364196,4.815933e-7,0.000009862351,0.0000073557035,0.94548374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902827,0.00003457113,0.00013295008,0.000250989,0.0003589699,0.00019424202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989183,0.000072078634,0.0003061963,0.00027535085,0.00031913418,0.00010894921],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001155096,0.0001660864,0.00030828328,0.000062515326,0.0014298118,0.000034199686,0.00061829627,0.00017050887,0.00001598538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038500268,0.0001954375,0.00018853,0.00000385323,0.0037065998,0.00010298712,0.0002593658,0.00020665982,0.000017747723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016978393,0.0000046364494,0.000012212307,0.0000086482405,0.000077361794,0.000040294024,0.00028350233,4.6347927e-7,0.000008664441,0.9885822,0.010476953,0.0004880683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020713163,0.000013147329,0.000058588525,0.00015743652,0.00013849307,8.2423605e-7,0.00025895424,4.723516e-7,0.000020204361,0.00046461044,0.9984687,0.00021143837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01998098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000877314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98811764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015420071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041242997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2460207295","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511550881.009","title":"THE CONCEPTUAL MODEL: WHAT'S THE OBJECT?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptual model; Computer science; Object (grammar); Artificial intelligence; Database","score_opus":0.0356043380166251,"score_gpt":0.2266031526015464,"score_spread":0.1909988145849213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2460207295","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000033393997,0.0022713733,0.000035478202,0.0005454373,0.00039236998,0.00036547185,0.000080866805,0.00008411687,0.9961915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010213535,0.00809311,0.0000032043374,0.0002819217,0.0004207573,0.000001482184,0.000005404219,0.000011785529,0.9809688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987149,0.00008444106,0.00012498259,0.000271737,0.00048292615,0.00032097648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910563,0.00026355084,0.00011408789,0.00026488717,0.0001561347,0.000095678835],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021541376,0.00021088085,0.0002018702,0.000026021373,0.0043245815,0.00022148275,0.0008002819,0.00021233171,0.000010045092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017279774,0.0001502939,0.00020764006,0.000010078395,0.0053279395,0.00016851729,0.00022514451,0.0003952102,0.000028048058],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036420184,0.000002516651,2.0367878e-7,9.1563123e-7,0.00009011114,0.00001901966,0.0009200244,0.000016040514,2.3351413e-7,0.96643794,0.027999775,0.004476813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000111731875,0.000009566174,0.0000021827923,0.000050827337,0.000112422036,9.237372e-7,0.003835713,0.000019795387,0.0000019082222,0.0020633633,0.99358916,0.00020238198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002915792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006102014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9655894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018687484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049201644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2462566515","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Inconsistency in Legislation – Interpretation, Remedies and the Ambiguous Role of Ambiguity","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Legislation; Constitution; Charter; Supreme court; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Legislature; Law; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Judicial interpretation; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.007734817367694564,"score_gpt":0.25147274723216234,"score_spread":0.24373792986446777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2462566515","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.803913,0.02891997,0.011608543,0.036892388,0.00064552703,0.0005142208,0.00001050838,0.00003887477,0.11745699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916617,0.008031484,0.000013358841,0.000050460254,0.0001378952,0.0000058123883,2.5427613e-7,0.0000012471678,0.00009777084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986963,0.00020624732,0.00024666122,0.00008761323,0.00026673535,0.0004963894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944687,0.0001829171,0.00013792358,0.00003963767,0.0001663075,0.00002631879],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023254137,0.000060355786,0.00013520564,0.00004541531,0.0004927405,0.00001734255,0.00011340103,0.000037344857,0.000011574865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007889025,0.000034020508,0.000048130365,0.00013082981,0.0034214184,0.0002094338,0.000028558548,0.00024682857,0.0000029837436],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094161944,0.0000129834,0.015099508,4.2317845e-7,0.000035902867,2.8821034e-7,0.0017752678,0.0000015795066,0.000064719774,0.9431221,0.0000049705295,0.039788082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077486166,0.000028423729,0.01183524,0.000045153552,0.000015217394,0.000017578866,0.008473654,0.0000057216253,0.000011923889,0.9772905,0.0014479815,0.00005373593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062377355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0569389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18774875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033527456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016758835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2465136185","doi":"10.7202/1036578ar","title":"La Cour suprême du Canada et la pluralité démotique de l’État canadien. Des traces de consociationalisme dans la jurisprudence constitutionnelle","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Jurisprudence; Political science; Philosophy; Ethnology; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.010261337322330718,"score_gpt":0.2452591943366253,"score_spread":0.23499785701429457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2465136185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82012063,0.0029851818,0.0015066154,0.034718264,0.0004936488,0.00023046661,0.00084399816,0.00006490338,0.1390363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873922,0.0058230897,0.00041556158,0.00067637395,0.00060977146,0.000057682882,0.000009486697,0.00001739789,0.004998476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996664,0.0012741948,0.00038345254,0.00037888807,0.00039533284,0.0009041205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99615717,0.0028026379,0.00019809662,0.0001398973,0.00025538725,0.00044680716],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018810306,0.00023281164,0.00037422593,0.000049821505,0.0011855917,0.00010691873,0.000413053,0.00034163633,0.00019190439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014306083,0.00027350406,0.0001489942,0.00034875958,0.004540435,0.00035537334,0.00007079802,0.00030596502,0.000028110715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011954171,0.00006895665,0.12477459,0.000048835944,0.0001087396,0.0006218936,0.008355222,0.0001614883,0.00010921813,0.86176807,0.0023194652,0.0016515972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081745064,0.00005030797,0.16703308,0.0011258605,0.0002255165,0.0014209992,0.010893184,0.00008393462,0.0001739024,0.4103762,0.40698203,0.0008175452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9038865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97963935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45139185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004230662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010580386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2465911966","doi":"10.1057/9780230593084_13","title":"The Constitutional Responsibility of the Civil Service","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Civil service; Civil servants; Political science; Foundation (evidence); Law; Corporate governance; Service (business); Constitutional law; Public administration; Public service; Management; Business; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.04531185164541579,"score_gpt":0.2901860181264876,"score_spread":0.2448741664810718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2465911966","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012498494,0.0018751927,0.000024599725,0.0012020082,0.0009448396,0.00055225793,0.00015453645,0.000036743106,0.9950848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99016577,0.00020900632,0.000017163631,0.0005929603,0.0005312273,0.0000113317665,0.000004287617,0.000009945472,0.008458325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762756,0.00013243046,0.00048372362,0.00031979152,0.0010559574,0.00038056963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99755865,0.0009111148,0.00034557132,0.00045944564,0.00062535517,0.00009984401],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014894686,0.00026616294,0.00032429484,0.000052733845,0.0024809183,0.000038783324,0.0007237376,0.00028293178,0.00021607804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034714074,0.0001610475,0.00030954953,0.00006147898,0.009086795,6.722802e-7,0.00030551202,0.00036475813,0.00006643713],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061712926,3.712283e-7,0.00033067915,0.000008114616,0.000102248596,0.000003851811,0.00064090133,5.4009195e-7,0.000008027542,0.99647343,0.000054254175,0.0023158444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010070517,0.000010219018,0.0013268659,0.000098059485,0.00005695679,0.0000028077015,0.0002651301,3.4731556e-7,0.000017241504,0.8520933,0.14585383,0.00017457674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024317934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07758273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9900408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017755448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013851378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99881774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2473381718","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2960","title":"Conservatives, the Supreme Court of Canada, and the Constitution: Judicial-Government Relations, 2006–2015","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Government (linguistics); Law; Charter; Narrative; Political science; Constitution; Legislation; Legislature; Sociology","score_opus":0.017403640949150624,"score_gpt":0.2437681554265631,"score_spread":0.2263645144774125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2473381718","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026141463,0.00311082,0.0005758793,0.17959245,0.0005523113,0.00021586508,0.00007414389,0.000008349889,0.813256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971302,0.00078789063,0.00004547089,0.00092636404,0.0003281816,0.0000064182673,2.2662896e-7,0.0000022003564,0.00077302405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827176,0.00031070225,0.00028005373,0.00009336357,0.00082454213,0.00021959274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867564,0.0006974796,0.00022435658,0.000086654116,0.00022596486,0.000089892215],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013907256,0.0000857471,0.0001665556,0.0000068454324,0.0031462978,0.00004448879,0.0002030355,0.000037805337,0.00016731479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045086164,0.000038913386,0.000052505824,0.00008188121,0.0044880677,0.00014846536,0.00005348036,0.00014084564,0.0000037090736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051465297,0.000010824922,0.0065984586,6.214719e-7,0.0000716848,0.00000403476,0.0004351173,0.0000037997881,0.00001417416,0.9741401,0.01832383,0.0003458781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017144603,0.00003104339,0.016876655,0.00013570917,0.00010618118,0.000053633874,0.0047684754,0.000004437869,0.00005482343,0.5148096,0.4612796,0.0001653716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89570016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9901327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9945161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002429385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011846294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99822116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W247503758","doi":"","title":"Esmein et le droit canadien: une rencontre manquée","year":2013,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista crítica de historia de las relaciones laborales y de la política social/Revista crítica de historia de las relaciones laborales y de la política social","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"French; Constitution; Political science; Humanities; Law; Art","score_opus":0.007715129355629878,"score_gpt":0.28716516807360465,"score_spread":0.27945003871797475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W247503758","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34184584,0.084797494,0.0056974906,0.3604851,0.008949162,0.008772506,0.006050599,0.0052104024,0.17819141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9617762,0.010460803,0.0062584444,0.004578951,0.010269569,0.0011072317,0.0002551873,0.00070831535,0.004585284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97111577,0.012491438,0.0036677753,0.0029456962,0.002877228,0.0069020665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98426527,0.0056260466,0.0023086604,0.0017493268,0.0026633323,0.0033873469],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0083245365,0.0029322433,0.0045088786,0.0010684908,0.008728695,0.0035650765,0.0033684121,0.005238887,0.0009195397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0093043195,0.0035214575,0.002089381,0.0048434297,0.011630448,0.001601188,0.0008198211,0.005075127,0.00061479036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054217776,0.0014125353,0.009778595,0.0011597672,0.0011443542,0.00081704825,0.028600423,0.00002318661,0.0020459455,0.8147302,0.13917878,0.00056696864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037898945,0.00031494958,0.020931985,0.001061413,0.0030598706,0.00029949777,0.010123,0.00017582891,0.000039504397,0.10423748,0.85234684,0.003619751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.073573016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010379014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.713168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031610236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019729089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2475791451","doi":"","title":"Indian Act By-Laws: A Viable Means for First Nations to (Re)Assert Control Over Local Matters Now and Not Later","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisdiction; Mandate; Political science; Federal jurisdiction; Government (linguistics); Statutory interpretation; Pace; Indian country; Negotiation; Power (physics); Statutory law; Geography","score_opus":0.011327064165617306,"score_gpt":0.2568753717229908,"score_spread":0.2455483075573735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2475791451","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41669187,0.0007339501,0.023580864,0.46910128,0.0020150838,0.0038691484,0.0019533555,0.0004177249,0.08163671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875199,0.000055376884,0.00011146592,0.00998505,0.00026277252,0.0001689001,0.0000037046793,0.000009521028,0.0018832687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886245,0.000040907744,0.00016513918,0.00026066284,0.00027787403,0.0003929799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909675,0.00041919595,0.000043745426,0.00009479299,0.00010044385,0.00024504427],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027323788,0.00012626084,0.00018473149,0.000045180303,0.0014589706,0.00009866929,0.00016238278,0.00008823551,0.00033023744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000200568,0.00009427234,0.00006498452,0.00014217237,0.00042696524,0.0003176272,0.00004121361,0.0000597575,0.0002533112],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034579053,0.00017647595,0.07221671,0.000045315242,0.00035857878,0.0000119684755,0.0036527612,0.000029887498,0.0022583774,0.69258994,0.22596419,0.0023500088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011623132,0.00006351989,0.006359627,0.000090360794,0.00003173905,5.516397e-7,0.00055850565,0.0000051902716,0.0003208277,0.00655109,0.98460305,0.000253221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00698159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32648098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75863886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014741614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001023647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2475800475","doi":"10.22201/iij.24487937e.2015.9.8183","title":"Charter Interpretation, Judicial Review and a Community's Constitutional Morality: Responding to Natalie Stoljar on Wil Waluchow","year":2015,"lang":"es","type":"review","venue":"Problema Anuario de Filosofía y Teoría del Derecho","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Interpretation (philosophy); Morality; Worry; Humanities; Philosophy; Epistemology; Democracy; Political science; Sociology; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.08516005879393775,"score_gpt":0.3752467636066387,"score_spread":0.290086704812701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2475800475","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033333333,0.8794864,0.00077425316,0.02771719,0.0010896603,0.005987148,0.0015791295,0.0002978883,0.082735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032787066,0.95013607,0.00096781796,0.012350918,0.0009345428,0.0012111173,0.00046736802,0.000074055046,0.0010710702],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900301,0.0042029642,0.0017505962,0.0011642356,0.0016228986,0.0012292113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99481326,0.0013767175,0.00090906903,0.0007424995,0.0012491565,0.00090927765],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074455366,0.0011941622,0.0030269998,0.0009187266,0.0038651854,0.0005122585,0.0012528343,0.00075024355,0.00022862587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039664702,0.0011006327,0.0005540103,0.0023822212,0.0033791403,0.00057560916,0.00077691895,0.0025934463,0.0009045401],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003123654,0.0007889047,0.00042170088,0.013261353,0.0012074575,0.00008004654,0.0069064107,0.000011387673,0.0000042323513,0.7303544,0.047680885,0.19897084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005306708,0.00053427776,0.00009475621,0.04368092,0.0018321853,0.0000963797,0.00046989953,0.000010734922,0.000001257133,0.049549762,0.9019632,0.0012359921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045825364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010470218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85428226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016578091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003657835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2476799288","doi":"10.29173/alr318","title":"Forging Alberta's Constitutional Framework, Richard Connors and John M. Law, eds., and The Alberta Supreme Court at 100: History and Authority, Jonathan Swainger, Ed.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Constitution; Jurisprudence; Law of the land; Common law; Constitutional law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03283384707397708,"score_gpt":0.2803437341057613,"score_spread":0.24750988703178423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2476799288","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056050173,0.5763293,0.000018972141,0.030201968,0.000655376,0.0009702396,0.000010134981,0.000027912245,0.3861811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5824317,0.3999378,0.000119881675,0.011494486,0.00040725942,0.00011030999,0.000013683528,0.000015572448,0.005469343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976351,0.000372186,0.0004630194,0.0005250874,0.00050849235,0.00049606257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956293,0.0035173073,0.00020284986,0.00022630264,0.00015085786,0.0002733801],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093726785,0.00032198516,0.0007261577,0.000029768747,0.0031057377,0.000055704993,0.00024857954,0.00017383837,0.00034640444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013285365,0.00024190193,0.0001437137,0.00016040578,0.014065156,0.00031608355,0.00034048205,0.00031228334,0.00005705124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024453539,0.000025193445,0.002214679,0.00013756254,0.00009827426,0.0000066086363,0.0017609512,1.262637e-7,0.0000012044475,0.9827026,0.012340758,0.0006875798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004820932,0.000020504021,0.00030973452,0.0010021667,0.00021219025,0.00011508672,0.00010020385,0.0000059148947,0.0000010256705,0.015052373,0.98236674,0.00033194912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.273042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23053835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.970026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020385791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027512977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2477706564","doi":"","title":"The U.S. Constitution and comparative constitutional law : texts, cases, and materials","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Entomology and Zoology","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Casebook; Law; Constitution; Political science; Constitutional law; Dignity; Civil liberties; Constitutionalism; Democracy; Comparative law; Jurisprudence; Rule of law; Human rights; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.040449249827115674,"score_gpt":0.3242350267866917,"score_spread":0.283785776959576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2477706564","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7475844,0.013626954,0.00094329903,0.08419093,0.0020098889,0.0004600862,0.000057374677,0.000076002965,0.15105107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99511087,0.0035383364,0.000016820755,0.0009800954,0.00014232959,0.000021116057,0.0000020264724,5.9451025e-7,0.00018784002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998964,0.0003103195,0.00016083768,0.000179897,0.00015516586,0.00022975296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99799347,0.0017344241,0.000043788845,0.00003741805,0.00005070023,0.00014021344],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069544715,0.00007843735,0.00018143874,0.000017850005,0.001536925,0.000018750223,0.00006375012,0.00016718959,0.0002632441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00075689337,0.00004208864,0.000010897819,0.0000345526,0.040170662,0.00006327232,0.000095072945,0.00007334594,0.000015604672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006220973,0.000011538196,0.0045994953,0.0000013802035,0.000030821368,0.00004729429,0.00024275959,3.6395305e-9,0.000039676655,0.9907242,0.00017694187,0.004063665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002156985,0.00019357153,0.024582192,0.000060430397,0.00006158033,0.0013125713,0.001199575,9.299687e-7,0.00013428011,0.66845816,0.3015983,0.0002413978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038815085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009846375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32226604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018149494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021024194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2477751738","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511996399.011","title":"Judges and free speech in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Impartiality; Law; Political science; Free speech; Independence (probability theory); Tribunal; Bill of rights; Freedom of expression; Subject (documents); Human rights; Computer science","score_opus":0.031073593547379295,"score_gpt":0.19541047880285728,"score_spread":0.164336885255478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2477751738","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009310118,0.00047246082,0.0000021498026,0.00009160584,0.00018021486,0.00017362586,0.00014142784,0.000021867307,0.99798566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031756423,0.0007481896,0.000013167412,0.000093688875,0.00011375881,3.2247777e-7,0.0000040403434,0.0000074473433,0.967263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991871,0.00002712482,0.00009118731,0.00024108126,0.00024355188,0.00020997055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954486,0.000053134903,0.00007047314,0.00014301922,0.00007749956,0.000111000496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000778393,0.00014874415,0.00022653546,0.00006273905,0.00035903868,0.00001320366,0.00031409613,0.00013176918,0.00001287338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021460755,0.0001766699,0.000039542556,0.000006986897,0.0006169838,0.000046832534,0.00029739432,0.00020769397,0.0000025432032],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000144213445,0.0000017268088,0.00026630634,0.0000062929703,0.0000322082,0.0002618796,0.00017734159,4.2146677e-8,2.6311437e-7,0.978234,0.019515328,0.0014902218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017860455,0.0000063247803,0.00078455295,0.00005592857,0.000042307547,0.0000014343786,0.00046018756,1.8347463e-7,0.0000045837955,0.00091147545,0.9973355,0.00021891051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9878705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9725917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97782016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006281921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013703017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72043896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2477902474","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004495","title":"Reality Check: On the Uses of Empiricism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Notice; Law; Principal (computer security); Empiricism; Politics; Majority opinion; Empirical research; Political science; Set (abstract data type); Judicial opinion; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.12448802076700792,"score_gpt":0.3353811908439809,"score_spread":0.21089317007697295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2477902474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7124881,0.001768308,0.000032322336,0.025145525,0.00064318336,0.00010838709,0.00002288483,0.000005589954,0.25978568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99796236,0.0003386995,0.00002200259,0.001225265,0.00030160093,9.615081e-7,1.0751742e-7,0.0000025223328,0.00014648975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989003,0.0001312295,0.0002610335,0.00007142169,0.00040872177,0.00022732602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988857,0.00022778107,0.00019834535,0.00009666227,0.00032788247,0.00026362666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006852915,0.000067356705,0.00016421286,0.000045272736,0.0012044393,0.000018691948,0.00039692348,0.000045879442,0.00012900657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047264298,0.00004638701,0.00009845405,0.00020324787,0.0021940616,0.00012376464,0.000009648386,0.00017104395,0.000013608034],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010026656,0.00001593824,0.01237185,0.0000018513288,0.000030804807,0.000121251884,0.006606306,0.000021884453,0.000019317047,0.96898764,0.01154406,0.0002690498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018817355,0.00017385579,0.13860169,0.00023758116,0.00003938875,0.00007266694,0.0031207073,9.1236427e-7,0.0005196355,0.05601505,0.8008204,0.0002099456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24782048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37629527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9129726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012424667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024750964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92636955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W247829152","doi":"10.3138/jcs.35.4.161","title":"A Relational Approach to Constitutional Interpretation: Shared Legislative and judicial Responsibilities","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Charter; Law; Legislature; Judgement; Political science; Scrutiny; Politics; Constitution; Normative; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.08277041333907274,"score_gpt":0.3151061979674701,"score_spread":0.23233578462839732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W247829152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06865761,0.00813958,0.00021745855,0.021800458,0.0005335839,0.00026349133,0.000084747175,0.00001362111,0.9002895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99476594,0.00082892005,0.0015768528,0.0009541952,0.0006492741,0.000008125691,0.0000013171726,0.000002597737,0.0012127813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987927,0.00012649728,0.00032223543,0.00012187265,0.00041750667,0.00021918562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867916,0.00028498616,0.000089000525,0.000036660993,0.0006331336,0.00027708316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066987,0.000094617586,0.00024944215,0.00044820766,0.0010874448,0.00004480152,0.000095327065,0.0000463346,0.0001567028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001056439,0.000084080995,0.00006433648,0.0004766598,0.0020348153,0.00033151725,0.000016430202,0.00013210825,0.000015754282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018697666,0.000018718803,0.0024128514,0.000003408439,0.00027982055,0.00001822784,0.05976263,0.00017534738,0.0000017003355,0.9146304,0.017886877,0.0046230583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041429012,0.00012482658,0.030160211,0.00014753021,0.00007340636,0.00005215489,0.040703747,0.000010098615,0.0000011996138,0.051818106,0.8762747,0.00021973447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026681684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1243721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92610836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003205054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017627174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97979975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2480128589","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-28371-5_13","title":"Common Law Constitutionalism and the Written Constitution","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Law and philosophy library","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Constitution; Law; Political science; Democracy","score_opus":0.02528376833178137,"score_gpt":0.2372869374388661,"score_spread":0.21200316910708475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2480128589","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000010580269,0.01127279,0.000004087103,0.043419246,0.00038248816,0.00034698498,0.00029926634,0.00009611335,0.94416845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91865116,0.010209844,0.00003650092,0.022251828,0.003879195,0.00003216416,0.00006761438,0.000020109057,0.044851553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988599,0.000082421975,0.00024950644,0.00029975447,0.00031163535,0.00019679224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991735,0.00040068047,0.00012240506,0.00013770006,0.000037352933,0.00012832736],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018448106,0.00024598127,0.00038409865,0.000029238749,0.0023197331,0.00014418898,0.00017770128,0.00027011152,0.00025717902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007865098,0.00015488747,0.000110530964,0.000022969609,0.023455545,0.00050432695,0.00019864843,0.00024009806,0.000058101403],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072195995,0.0000056668528,0.000040589297,0.000012068012,0.00009110768,0.000015124559,0.00014715153,2.9287607e-8,2.4051178e-7,0.9984229,0.0007884636,0.00040446757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030701666,0.000007198366,0.0000051678376,0.00013505446,0.00004108603,0.0000060830594,0.000006752762,6.1991265e-8,5.399511e-7,0.51938224,0.47998342,0.00012541034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014075265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004556332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9186406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017124166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018263374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2482659382","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004380","title":"Censorship, Logocracy and Democracy","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Censorship; Charter; Democracy; Law; Political science; Legislature; Politics; Free speech; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.041191366519729114,"score_gpt":0.28902593959219386,"score_spread":0.24783457307246476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2482659382","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81897223,0.0086492505,0.000089870824,0.01704445,0.00086710916,0.00010589776,0.000010867451,0.0000127965595,0.15424755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99733114,0.00086210575,0.00020983892,0.000862675,0.00045044348,5.543827e-7,1.4088089e-7,0.0000036922738,0.00027940728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990141,0.000083568906,0.00021901634,0.00009462877,0.00027059187,0.00031808886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987652,0.0001237273,0.00012037323,0.00005623882,0.0002731817,0.0006613195],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038244095,0.00007770723,0.00016329646,0.000070943766,0.0020395627,0.00004716439,0.00023219615,0.000056618836,0.0001284951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034106063,0.00007217409,0.000056366738,0.00015148848,0.0019694315,0.00034805504,0.000011681029,0.00018010358,0.000023931423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000099607605,0.000009887389,0.058373168,0.0000029835405,0.000028292061,0.0008774167,0.007139727,0.0000066774164,0.000015033105,0.92885345,0.00332879,0.0013546298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002901714,0.000088299195,0.10096451,0.000120939294,0.000036992922,0.00046128605,0.0014526792,0.0000012621506,0.000044226847,0.10452019,0.79175276,0.00026668774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.110887095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2842476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82433325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011643337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019576221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99925965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2483824911","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781316144930.010","title":"Dreaming the rule of law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Rule of law; Law; Computer science; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06031350594233822,"score_gpt":0.24804973950906664,"score_spread":0.18773623356672842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2483824911","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004585033,0.00054907554,0.000020668585,0.00011040663,0.00020822269,0.00018115008,0.00010628131,0.000037942595,0.9987404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022918222,0.00012366797,0.000009132907,0.00006184387,0.00023048052,2.7468013e-7,0.000004850048,0.0000067100273,0.9766448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916995,0.00003860185,0.00009840915,0.00016004157,0.00037769572,0.00015529613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992781,0.000084006315,0.00013676935,0.00015658706,0.00026998227,0.00007451267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020055963,0.00012385621,0.00021081817,0.000030577874,0.0007455687,0.00001593782,0.00039721723,0.00014888532,0.000005211286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017260585,0.00011034288,0.00012179189,0.000006128724,0.002234245,0.00004685875,0.00023121233,0.00017625248,0.000010110644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015986536,0.0000030784252,0.0000013299647,0.000005120003,0.00007250048,0.000016606984,0.00070341583,5.24926e-7,0.0000019861488,0.9890114,0.009781277,0.00038674314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010228132,0.000009601975,0.000005561762,0.000057036526,0.000105664476,5.7619087e-7,0.0005157302,3.727332e-7,0.000012904035,0.0013163458,0.9977491,0.00012480644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02123677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003470439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98796785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014119149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028847205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9852809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2485501773","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199246687.003.0018","title":"The Canadian Charter of Rights: Recognition, Redistribution, and the Imperialism of the Courts","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Human rights; Supreme court; Law; Politics; Fundamental rights; Linguistic rights; Democracy; Social rights; Right to property; International human rights law","score_opus":0.019371332123288735,"score_gpt":0.23272155905561007,"score_spread":0.21335022693232134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2485501773","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011613512,0.0010748842,0.000002706648,0.019744106,0.00058392267,0.00034566413,0.0002628529,0.0000058487512,0.9778639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9018697,0.0035246422,0.0000025573258,0.00058806746,0.001050731,0.000022366807,0.000025827163,0.000006937442,0.092909165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906385,0.00006615673,0.00025490756,0.00010943615,0.000347034,0.0001586357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898946,0.00019916006,0.00019259243,0.00013269276,0.00043132232,0.000054744505],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064239925,0.00010331633,0.00018763528,0.000018231582,0.0027504626,0.000037733196,0.00023443768,0.00013999268,0.0003501115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012497051,0.000043136803,0.00010536471,0.000038897637,0.0055906656,0.0000308206,0.00004128,0.00012271336,0.0000074722157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010353095,0.0000014288117,0.000011915761,9.522947e-7,0.000055407963,3.410893e-7,0.00080009946,1.1413008e-8,2.582442e-7,0.986179,0.012352299,0.0005879369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008940997,0.0000031971063,0.00007961343,0.00002839861,0.0000384942,9.008457e-7,0.00021120602,1.0216448e-7,0.00000330945,0.49781215,0.50169224,0.000040991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5809605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90292895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90175354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008693022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000597217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2489273056","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781107110311.002","title":"Burdens of Proof in Legal Reasoning","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Burden of proof; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.022915529025306025,"score_gpt":0.22569421164129955,"score_spread":0.20277868261599352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2489273056","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033959743,0.00018213167,0.00007821992,0.000049562168,0.00015088353,0.00022871797,0.00004316745,0.000029856968,0.99889785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10796127,0.000095790194,0.00002295541,0.000019654019,0.00018154028,3.90345e-7,0.0000046146893,0.0000075132593,0.8917063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990626,0.000049830356,0.00014371531,0.0002333455,0.00030740976,0.00020312339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994182,0.00006474726,0.00016187015,0.00012887009,0.00015508675,0.00007122852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019342623,0.00014631078,0.00031839093,0.00011096947,0.00029066004,0.00001374304,0.0002836593,0.0002082345,0.000005176357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042933094,0.00017491683,0.0001180042,0.000011056027,0.00097028643,0.00004247354,0.00016605016,0.0002308973,0.0000041947906],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029291547,0.0000041858684,0.000026157984,0.000015462703,0.000038367914,0.000053802465,0.00029267755,0.0000023146786,0.0000036053405,0.99582595,0.002989163,0.00071899843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019462492,0.000018969868,0.00006168732,0.0002620229,0.000054870627,7.960839e-7,0.000276377,0.0000030311946,0.00002478487,0.00015442583,0.99876153,0.00018687538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016116051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012517443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99577236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018142343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002917176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9904357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2489335664","doi":"10.1093/0199261180.003.0009","title":"The Emergence of Republican Rights","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Globalization; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Cultural rights; Political economy; Public administration; Law; Human rights; Sociology; History; Fundamental rights; Politics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.031073656198231173,"score_gpt":0.282414870427917,"score_spread":0.25134121422968586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2489335664","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000048472525,0.0010603056,0.00000948729,0.0030950853,0.00038239147,0.00010461786,0.000006189175,0.000026320477,0.9953108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09774048,0.0023592175,0.000024778972,0.00008063767,0.00041586973,0.0000042147253,0.0000015002299,0.0000035866506,0.8993697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991655,0.000009117403,0.00017778242,0.00012129957,0.0003968723,0.00012945753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994766,0.000073968025,0.00010968792,0.000107784625,0.00019127427,0.00004067077],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020890398,0.00008114739,0.0001280259,0.000019171854,0.0011996124,0.000015650829,0.00024624355,0.000088249886,0.003610594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045663484,0.000047821984,0.00009851147,0.00003105775,0.0016614599,0.00003307027,0.000049308626,0.00008666258,0.000040876992],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015881221,0.00000247453,0.0000050295744,6.6235157e-7,0.000030318884,7.7192146e-7,0.00022409152,1.7064289e-7,1.8939103e-7,0.99073815,0.007705041,0.0012915196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009846449,0.00000448403,0.000014659062,0.000012252597,0.0000064527485,4.9129063e-8,0.000085545274,1.142407e-8,0.000001416964,0.49354482,0.50628227,0.00003818128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017187092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04176927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49857724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035507823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037715503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99730027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2490826838","doi":"10.29173/alr311","title":"Parens Patriae as a Basis for Provincial Standing in Judicial Review of Federal Decisions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; State (computer science); Judicial review; Sovereignty; Private rights; Public rights; Government (linguistics); Sovereign immunity; Constitution","score_opus":0.07279302115669435,"score_gpt":0.3563120840525252,"score_spread":0.28351906289583084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2490826838","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004512052,0.7058775,0.000061023344,0.016084902,0.0004783062,0.0035872778,0.00006778518,0.000026376465,0.26930478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24687123,0.7459391,0.00013124861,0.006378787,0.00028366354,0.00022464099,0.000010083029,0.000007782629,0.00015347614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822766,0.00018559291,0.0006205594,0.00023360575,0.0004237154,0.0003088718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826217,0.0010960473,0.00019660384,0.00012579662,0.00023086349,0.000088517554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088166224,0.00013311834,0.0006804637,0.000028238564,0.0008725811,0.000010080514,0.00021121727,0.00005608134,0.00022772752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063002724,0.00011148078,0.0002748397,0.0004641197,0.00045472826,0.00014031424,0.000056675264,0.00008279799,0.00003559881],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024200006,0.00008788866,0.0019422456,0.001801678,0.000036833753,0.0000075024586,0.00068137294,1.0223908e-7,0.0000016341565,0.9736697,0.011826497,0.009920362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023817751,0.000062844694,0.0002996344,0.04087409,0.000104915875,0.000004672516,0.00007776368,2.592639e-7,0.0000029158498,0.010500904,0.94764245,0.00019137241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10408387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18332304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9631688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011937641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074806414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9018821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2491870741","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781107706798.007","title":"Pragmatism and the High Commission","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Content (measure theory); Pragmatism; Computer science; Political science; Epistemology; Mathematics; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.01873745677563751,"score_gpt":0.21098610543895188,"score_spread":0.19224864866331437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2491870741","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003626518,0.0004006173,0.0001959771,0.0006636871,0.00020870476,0.0002835639,0.000035213874,0.000054742264,0.9981212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032517098,0.0006641313,0.000013590942,0.00011932029,0.00021860623,5.4373413e-7,0.0000044291637,0.000006572778,0.9664557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920005,0.00010345131,0.000087349596,0.00019065909,0.00027286407,0.0001456227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993312,0.00022404465,0.000118116965,0.00013992874,0.00009868119,0.000088025285],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002581785,0.00014328018,0.0002453233,0.00003418101,0.0014852983,0.00004215155,0.0002635286,0.00017286009,0.0000057844877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034221146,0.00011440787,0.000080939026,0.0000045044635,0.0026330624,0.0000311256,0.00025994613,0.0002193612,0.000009542949],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004331689,0.0000011930082,0.0000017683834,0.000006616693,0.000051837596,0.000011344384,0.00027008404,1.0055018e-7,2.861684e-7,0.9757717,0.021840522,0.002001211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004705921,0.000008051607,0.000048520295,0.00008587766,0.00011898999,0.0000011608996,0.00014602416,0.0000021657354,0.0000012791679,0.0021288204,0.99684143,0.00014707677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013433368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020150242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9750009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000069775364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009665189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2496009610","doi":"10.5325/goodsociety.20.1.0073","title":"Constitutional Artisanship and Institutional Diversity:","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Good Society","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Icon; Citation; Download; Diversity (politics); State (computer science); Library science; Politics; Political science; Search engine optimization; Publishing; Media studies; World Wide Web; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Search engine; Algorithm","score_opus":0.09882504941416737,"score_gpt":0.26870447130229036,"score_spread":0.169879421888123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2496009610","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18290277,0.0011073378,0.0020430097,0.0045917276,0.0005324278,0.00023677378,0.000030080184,0.00011931968,0.8084366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99802727,0.0003107371,0.0002943618,0.00093565654,0.00022688329,0.000006330215,0.0000014436797,9.070052e-7,0.00019640313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992738,0.000055899367,0.00007579784,0.00011817483,0.000292415,0.00018391883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970996,0.00007500275,0.000029827435,0.000055883433,0.000063840525,0.0000655072],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044954623,0.00006491653,0.00007328172,0.000004711643,0.005394103,0.000020894146,0.00015827452,0.000053833824,0.00016445972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005338818,0.000048137805,0.000078713296,0.000121972174,0.0073836492,0.0001406121,0.00023401885,0.00010793146,0.00004427104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004602514,0.000021206642,0.044795185,9.852942e-7,0.000043754968,0.0000011990958,0.019640276,5.2931375e-7,0.0000038682697,0.9336974,0.000949652,0.00084131304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005721339,0.000032669537,0.3139743,0.000028045082,0.000120781966,0.000012843418,0.032210194,0.000016281925,0.000032762106,0.42637053,0.22627865,0.00035081568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046010786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007836794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8151245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055360724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019020693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99590075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2496809799","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199557769.001.0001","title":"Delegating Rights Protection","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Bill of rights; Politics; Charter; Law; Civil liberties; Human rights; Statutory law; Elite; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.029492247000531407,"score_gpt":0.27670077779104196,"score_spread":0.24720853079051056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2496809799","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001553375,0.000056745845,0.00012455045,0.00062380795,0.0007640561,0.00039688192,0.000002532356,0.00012250608,0.9978934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006169364,0.000022859447,0.00011946917,0.00008942029,0.0025744261,0.000049097664,0.000004161531,0.000004310601,0.9909669],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926376,0.000021598482,0.00010879703,0.00014679409,0.00030874903,0.00015028784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996738,0.000034490495,0.00007028343,0.00005211333,0.0001237641,0.000045589848],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018962771,0.00008978954,0.00012001027,0.00003447667,0.0015579829,0.000041311392,0.00010508795,0.0002848802,0.0012389077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006254399,0.00007352087,0.00006334776,0.00004396819,0.0004754571,0.00006495401,0.00002834998,0.00034506674,0.00060682074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.810342e-7,0.0000038114595,0.0000018720118,0.0000017473754,0.000013149737,0.0000013807295,0.0003160218,6.419154e-8,0.0000044669846,0.9781854,0.015859755,0.0056113624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000153361,0.0000040762884,0.000005090329,0.000017365877,0.000007585718,2.3676581e-7,0.000033244643,3.4365624e-7,0.0000048978177,0.34271735,0.6571204,0.00007405491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021408813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10841635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6412607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012202846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000588283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2498781594","doi":"10.29173/alr246","title":"&lt;i&gt;Weak Courts, Strong Rights: Judicial Review and Social Welfare Rights in Comparative Constitutional Law&lt;/i&gt;, Mark Tushnet","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Judicial review; Welfare rights; Social rights; Constitutional law; Judicial restraint; Welfare; Judicial activism; Human rights","score_opus":0.03604896672027261,"score_gpt":0.30205467633477995,"score_spread":0.2660057096145073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2498781594","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006331974,0.3146483,0.0000046342293,0.01938032,0.000269575,0.0012106916,0.00008432073,0.000037426173,0.6637316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8712893,0.12201015,0.000050069113,0.005289125,0.0005093128,0.00016540836,0.00011615704,0.000007754754,0.0005627123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99674237,0.0005864959,0.0007899456,0.00055337,0.0007236188,0.0006041892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987342,0.00035633604,0.00027973618,0.00017097498,0.00027431757,0.00018443764],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067156326,0.00038047743,0.0012982838,0.000040742914,0.00420451,0.000040669547,0.00033971106,0.00014931936,0.0008991102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000093854476,0.000316118,0.00022668178,0.00041349174,0.0071638967,0.00042161104,0.00012401135,0.00027469298,0.00019164167],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000102174245,0.00009130204,0.000094134266,0.00033414486,0.00009160804,0.000020503481,0.00042287412,2.1051505e-7,0.0000011349108,0.9736169,0.025225991,0.00009098363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003569942,0.000026173931,0.00076781504,0.0028033778,0.00027617646,0.000025927879,0.00001900547,5.565265e-7,7.575204e-7,0.010600875,0.9847172,0.00040513583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0370184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30063036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96301603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021212279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033741043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2500420217","doi":"10.4018/978-1-59904-998-4.ch013","title":"Courts on the Web in Russia","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IGI Global eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Skepticism; Economic Justice; Political science","score_opus":0.03018805952745681,"score_gpt":0.2768453033660644,"score_spread":0.24665724383860757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2500420217","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002090705,0.00046046785,3.9151146e-7,0.004221337,0.000346357,0.00026702418,0.000042758787,0.000050301387,0.9944023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8891099,0.000094550596,0.0000054133343,0.0032186268,0.0007553309,0.000010552,7.028655e-7,0.0000066683892,0.10679826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987586,0.000034360157,0.00018146381,0.00022610248,0.0005283946,0.00027107281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995968,0.00007200712,0.00008489873,0.00013461987,0.000047022444,0.00006465477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022949105,0.00019078258,0.00022937066,0.000027755415,0.0005071,0.00005187835,0.0002850198,0.00022164498,0.000093497445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004510392,0.00013589089,0.00011971866,0.000018853121,0.00060585525,0.000016453592,0.0000463584,0.00023924957,0.00034988477],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001188261,0.000006177487,0.000020128335,6.062799e-7,0.000018092993,0.00003308883,0.00016529759,5.6199946e-7,1.9506867e-7,0.9863155,0.006162439,0.0072660395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004865543,0.000016316648,0.00018790884,0.00008349459,0.000009397078,5.6201776e-7,0.000049053127,1.6072872e-7,2.3125267e-7,0.5983484,0.4011511,0.00010477106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023459753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015178791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8889008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003397163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051944196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84701216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2501486594","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199246687.003.0001","title":"Introduction: On Being Sceptical about Human Rights","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Parliament; Political science; Skepticism; Law; International human rights law; Statute; Fundamental rights; Legislation; Politics","score_opus":0.028869479544128596,"score_gpt":0.2931213340121179,"score_spread":0.26425185446798927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2501486594","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000041994634,0.000096501906,0.00001929056,0.0062687066,0.00088425924,0.00013425351,0.000002558171,0.00011920923,0.99243325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.030613098,0.00012777532,0.000025032588,0.0003082231,0.016833507,0.00000485871,0.000010437945,0.000008569281,0.9520685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986896,0.000016969787,0.00019374928,0.00032850288,0.00053694914,0.00023421696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995694,0.000043900796,0.00005530402,0.000117912314,0.00011948129,0.00009396447],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016273047,0.00017701426,0.00023438559,0.000070053735,0.0024788436,0.00005425907,0.00014828201,0.00022741537,0.016056864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020305513,0.00014696323,0.00012410086,0.00003326123,0.0011515314,0.000056823825,0.00004160329,0.0002683763,0.0020724498],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003848386,0.000012086044,0.0000064095125,9.81647e-7,0.000037672242,0.000012582347,0.00014788666,3.0458128e-7,5.4650303e-7,0.9568164,0.041839648,0.0011216645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029319675,0.00002077538,0.000020711237,0.000025545127,0.000017647797,6.5098794e-7,0.000020947295,2.9081606e-8,0.0000010271701,0.42450452,0.575242,0.00011684856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027431676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011008355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5334023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017335676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006371865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99881977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2503475841","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199606078.003.0003","title":"Governing Like Judges?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Scrutiny; Skepticism; Politics; Bureaucracy; Judicial review; Law and economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.06263097720416115,"score_gpt":0.2684960441311539,"score_spread":0.20586506692699275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2503475841","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000027846063,0.001258415,0.000036837067,0.00048341983,0.0005535374,0.00009001353,0.000011084685,0.00009745605,0.99746644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006589691,0.0015478341,0.000047990383,0.00067506515,0.0007914239,0.0000032139685,0.000004822525,0.000009251451,0.9903307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991793,0.000008430008,0.00011957132,0.00017943002,0.0003382906,0.00017497025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965036,0.00004199224,0.000077030694,0.000077513905,0.00008347213,0.000069618],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013791093,0.00012581285,0.00017140027,0.000026666828,0.0006308997,0.00002294303,0.00016398642,0.00018732369,0.012773425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003133011,0.00011167973,0.00010658018,0.0000141925,0.00060386903,0.000055756307,0.00008347474,0.00015050572,0.0038361303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019363924,0.0000026888258,0.00007470174,0.0000010971265,0.000036584435,0.0000053733056,0.0005558114,1.7201256e-8,1.0344848e-7,0.96897405,0.026334222,0.004013425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019674235,0.0000062395834,0.000056606812,0.000018618308,0.000019541661,2.0783709e-7,0.000108822474,1.621214e-8,1.4148709e-7,0.25345057,0.7461975,0.00012204892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00715021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011512361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7198633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098239325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000214897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2506553429","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1333","title":"A False Start in Constitutionalizing Lawyer Loyalty in Canada (Attorney General) v. Federation of Law Societies of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Supreme court; Charter; Duty; Economic Justice; Loyalty","score_opus":0.037464262260314546,"score_gpt":0.2785010715568673,"score_spread":0.24103680929655277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2506553429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20715915,0.24084741,0.000089049696,0.06108677,0.0016063873,0.002418405,0.00069440727,0.000035881392,0.48606256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98777086,0.010317173,0.000040334413,0.0016793235,0.000051034815,0.000024343923,0.0000043975156,0.0000030923227,0.000109422006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983295,0.00017702997,0.0005050547,0.00015832135,0.00057471124,0.00025537625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930364,0.00014928538,0.00014535995,0.00009251757,0.00024827025,0.0000609305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000642262,0.00010451377,0.00040186034,0.00001328284,0.0002457387,0.000006185779,0.00013870785,0.00003377264,0.00015929538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017723373,0.00008071561,0.00005088524,0.00015995406,0.00065829523,0.0001360166,0.000036492183,0.00005970174,0.0000011219262],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042172787,0.000014776417,0.008124161,0.00018816935,0.000015838583,0.0000053496533,0.000092318456,0.000010027698,0.00006533449,0.98478144,0.006517972,0.00018040536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036418356,0.000011278404,0.0030740655,0.0045309355,0.00002592323,0.0000010631353,0.0003686,0.0000019155423,0.00026677817,0.012919021,0.9781958,0.00024044437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99956185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97186244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010507095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008838713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513434008","doi":"","title":"La modification constitutionnelle au Canada quelle procédure de révision pour quelle constitution","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue belge de Droit constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0360644003613687,"score_gpt":0.2753735011573912,"score_spread":0.23930910079602247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2513434008","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06849305,0.026085801,0.13716187,0.03432207,0.0078045717,0.0016938307,0.00061957195,0.00037797308,0.72344124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98953134,0.0015555145,0.0016222744,0.00067865424,0.0024285626,0.00014586176,0.00010554074,0.000023267561,0.0039089867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99497485,0.00088843965,0.00094153424,0.00087584415,0.00090763875,0.0014117006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963577,0.00053240353,0.0004811086,0.0004522217,0.0010853959,0.0010912124],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024072751,0.0005766135,0.00070067536,0.00018671631,0.0028939163,0.00016461445,0.0005977622,0.0007681215,0.0002113295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026025758,0.00071381615,0.00025796623,0.0012476651,0.007257156,0.00077295385,0.00017826048,0.0007911471,0.00042039432],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073115465,0.00038259613,0.008358108,0.0001476311,0.00015056833,0.00027063597,0.0028199453,0.008706389,0.00009757814,0.95273024,0.022713065,0.0035501556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023346844,0.00008827446,0.0019853825,0.001586588,0.0004987153,0.0011706721,0.013878702,0.0048789294,0.00021244164,0.13646758,0.8355693,0.0013287256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81249946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6828204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92103827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012553421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.064626105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99953127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513997421","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3609","title":"Quantifying <i>Dunsmuir</i>: An empirical analysis of the Supreme Court of Canada’s jurisprudence on standard of review","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Deference; Standard of review; Law; Jurisprudence; Argument (complex analysis); Voting; Political science; Court of record; Original jurisdiction; Medicine","score_opus":0.04199834323995864,"score_gpt":0.3078332140184926,"score_spread":0.26583487077853396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2513997421","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76003087,0.01794406,0.00092682434,0.025826106,0.00066693756,0.00039506122,0.0005702915,0.000012428073,0.19362743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937461,0.0060409266,0.00006869484,0.00006666795,0.000020067193,1.4091423e-8,1.802465e-7,9.145613e-7,0.000056409714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987243,0.00018538917,0.00019674745,0.0000741268,0.000706813,0.00011263091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988873,0.00011229361,0.0003611314,0.000102790866,0.00046633978,0.00007012221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060029543,0.0000504128,0.00033125505,0.0000157442,0.00052347884,0.0000021246112,0.00035724387,0.000026864593,0.0004135703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010514888,0.000032817727,0.00017798264,0.000112642294,0.000758559,0.0001637672,0.00004559772,0.000045961522,8.9672454e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008618042,0.00040512605,0.27395067,0.00020609408,0.0031985203,0.00002347985,0.016549313,0.00012967516,0.0013722656,0.6745306,0.019909466,0.008862981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015445275,0.0008380513,0.4799613,0.005988355,0.0044682957,0.000004314278,0.03833311,0.000015412805,0.0013601878,0.0017854704,0.46519104,0.00050993124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8539605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99379826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67274517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002991245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009023642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45283046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2516518577","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1287","title":"Parliamentary Scrutiny of Supreme Court Nominees: A View from the United Kingdom","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Kingdom; Biology","score_opus":0.04697390401722121,"score_gpt":0.2860130565997499,"score_spread":0.2390391525825287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2516518577","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23583414,0.0048409766,0.0005520145,0.022497011,0.0011367542,0.0003025352,0.00011479785,0.00005532492,0.73466647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99720544,0.00033425752,0.00026926963,0.0008589934,0.0012725474,0.0000033006584,0.000011145804,0.0000055153982,0.000039523908],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985944,0.00019238051,0.00032780704,0.00011256059,0.00050640927,0.00026645124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992063,0.0002621607,0.00019487778,0.000092441864,0.00017308988,0.00007115494],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005677093,0.00010620682,0.0001943825,0.000026476002,0.0016547161,0.00008837511,0.00033659997,0.000052782554,0.00038989505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055415614,0.00007257813,0.000119697674,0.00021045958,0.00084925984,0.00013650116,0.00005335503,0.00020546075,0.000023683557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022616305,0.00008322231,0.01270129,0.0000014633623,0.00008304864,0.000012665464,0.0005673004,0.00005062123,0.000115725474,0.9797767,0.0060657137,0.0005196447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075620634,0.000051643543,0.01875839,0.0002540222,0.00015556738,0.0000149077505,0.005096027,0.00001933933,0.00012500858,0.47744212,0.49708277,0.0002440241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85586554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6228884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7613713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000844004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012968064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2517602928","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1390","title":"Blocs, Swarms, and Outliers: Conceptualizing Disagreement on the Modern Supreme Court of Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unanimity; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Speculation; Set (abstract data type); Sociology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.03387048991167127,"score_gpt":0.2606514565487561,"score_spread":0.22678096663708483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2517602928","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050430004,0.0018119799,0.0003113199,0.042000838,0.0005594455,0.00019901575,0.000024529794,0.000014255966,0.9046486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983559,0.00028976487,0.000055123106,0.00095515634,0.0002406919,0.0000023337013,3.793591e-7,0.000003554806,0.00009708997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987541,0.00007487057,0.00019224544,0.0000985778,0.000627851,0.00025237052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950355,0.00009737736,0.00011055569,0.000060417005,0.000110201625,0.000117902106],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045690878,0.000086226275,0.0001369269,0.00001076686,0.0017879427,0.000053835494,0.00016921456,0.000029861785,0.000056722616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008185504,0.000057760546,0.000041215528,0.00005359867,0.0007557545,0.000079084675,0.000037508937,0.00016511657,0.0000015495885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010847981,0.000027281143,0.0004820372,0.0000013397131,0.00005271703,0.0000100401085,0.00401065,0.0002500391,0.000026439573,0.99403185,0.00071362127,0.00038311226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006596872,0.00008869427,0.00087482214,0.00016646564,0.000047996324,0.000015443857,0.024505489,0.000012363172,0.00022614104,0.9421686,0.031031903,0.00020239595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9195071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98784775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9479259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022265608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005679906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2518480279","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2821129","title":"Collateral Thoughts on Dialogue's Legacy as Metaphor and Theory: A Favourite from Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Favourite; Metaphor; Collateral; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Linguistics; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.00857971304919408,"score_gpt":0.24091814250505564,"score_spread":0.23233842945586156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2518480279","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9651609,0.004288295,0.00015063897,0.013326011,0.00066943665,0.00010899745,0.00002565021,0.000017731565,0.016252318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909642,0.0053356374,0.000005934936,0.0004553678,0.0016000706,0.0000037825673,8.8335605e-7,0.0000057246143,0.0016283953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791193,0.00023887235,0.00014110193,0.00016459811,0.0003953275,0.0011481864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999388,0.00028944833,0.000078087454,0.000057363315,0.00006431416,0.00012281249],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009184124,0.000113490765,0.0001644679,0.000034521334,0.0011318647,0.000084688894,0.00016767743,0.00004709042,0.000042952062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018880908,0.00006971736,0.00005195435,0.000103162696,0.00028522327,0.00020888029,0.000028083938,0.0003597923,0.000017724196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000113346025,0.000015661302,0.0019488538,2.0261172e-7,0.00020563365,0.000014564681,0.0005349215,2.535174e-7,0.0000970457,0.96395934,0.000365548,0.03274465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004100153,0.00008949196,0.0021830795,0.000024131481,0.000036076195,0.000014840291,0.005505731,1.0333806e-7,0.000070392736,0.93739897,0.054134697,0.00013248855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.70973396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9705917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26085773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009813762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006386934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99924594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519836656","doi":"","title":"Teaching Religious Freedom as Legal Pluralism in Canadian Constitutional Law Classes","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Normative; Law; Legal realism; Sociology; Pluralism (philosophy); Empirical legal studies; Political science; Legal profession; Legal research; Constitutional law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01596025389885237,"score_gpt":0.28797790924970146,"score_spread":0.2720176553508491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519836656","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10792142,0.0074131857,0.00020108031,0.03661275,0.0012752957,0.00018263333,0.000008807996,0.000053565964,0.84633124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99591494,0.0010869972,0.000031696545,0.0008730973,0.0010838535,0.000004820855,0.0000029614162,0.000004811033,0.0009968352],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99667627,0.00020344842,0.00023689422,0.00016051685,0.00052191736,0.0022009576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999232,0.000059519694,0.00007219576,0.000057272093,0.00016192724,0.0004171089],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027738004,0.000120891695,0.00016539899,0.00014223573,0.0014886045,0.00012835026,0.00027820026,0.00010036479,0.000018420507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004885808,0.00011443856,0.00007175024,0.00018455953,0.0013155044,0.00039968806,0.00002694083,0.0015140289,0.00009757557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000148242425,0.000019124907,0.0044127684,2.52943e-7,0.00003601626,0.00004453754,0.0012876181,0.000048112204,0.000002926636,0.9926556,0.0009372367,0.00054101757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031228943,0.00004731552,0.00009626375,0.000015246317,0.0000091564725,0.00017080981,0.009250531,0.0000027719864,7.3262595e-7,0.5968125,0.3931601,0.00012229699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97698814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99527115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8879935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047417893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03734069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520716333","doi":"10.17394/83537","title":"Concept of Democracy and Role of the Judge in the Protection of Felons' Voting Right.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Democracy; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Computer security; Sociology; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.051816074591186305,"score_gpt":0.3058532693738304,"score_spread":0.2540371947826441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520716333","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8938521,0.000317486,0.0013529263,0.0036487954,0.00018987931,0.001179155,0.00010076433,0.000017518581,0.09934134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998673,0.000028555442,0.000011040853,0.000006143323,0.00003262678,0.000014436825,0.0000013286657,9.3444515e-7,0.000037588852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977936,0.00039721048,0.00033388395,0.000085386586,0.0011991085,0.00019079984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853456,0.00032662813,0.0002503356,0.00009704792,0.0007576632,0.000033739514],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016615844,0.00006650981,0.00015568302,0.00023813288,0.0013927222,0.000016587517,0.00032512328,0.00005560602,0.000012021098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005279011,0.00003732351,0.000060900427,0.0009197166,0.002064783,0.0008798707,0.0001565155,0.00011182967,0.000005372501],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043733653,0.000031131538,0.0182538,0.000040964387,0.00003347397,6.7374015e-7,0.013740344,0.000033492415,0.00013601509,0.96123606,0.000042564734,0.006407722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027998525,0.00019896132,0.62680244,0.0018069687,0.00005204804,0.00001646206,0.3350553,0.00030809155,0.0016689923,0.007910905,0.023116848,0.0002631338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061363466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012907172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95332515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002734433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005066019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2521694751","doi":"","title":"Covering: Mutable Characteristics and Perceptions of (Masculine) Voice in the U.S. Supreme Court","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Toulouse 1 Capitole Publications (Université Toulouse I Capitole)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Connaught Fund; University of Chicago; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Supreme court; Masculinity; Petitioner; Perception; Social psychology; Law; Economic Justice; Psychology; Femininity; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.019706401895274284,"score_gpt":0.2562149156807763,"score_spread":0.23650851378550203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2521694751","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8890272,0.002254781,0.0015452994,0.055915732,0.0010030493,0.0019047889,0.0013058481,0.00034773687,0.046695612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902902,0.0064626588,0.00022634563,0.00026292176,0.0006909234,0.00012282412,0.00014910291,0.000033266744,0.0017617258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966363,0.00040786716,0.00062240683,0.00074855215,0.0009178694,0.00066706026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970624,0.00046668493,0.0005188269,0.0008935499,0.00082180445,0.00023672041],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094075204,0.0004276785,0.0006836845,0.00057739846,0.0015090473,0.00025368208,0.0014210654,0.0004981195,0.00033619034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041136838,0.00038063645,0.0002541753,0.0008331519,0.001665389,0.00054001185,0.0008347531,0.00070531893,0.0000836282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009599745,0.0011581295,0.060561884,0.00023895796,0.00054068636,0.000042383712,0.13620864,0.000078759585,0.0005882408,0.7589044,0.035322588,0.0062593515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017465479,0.00011445451,0.33644935,0.00059785275,0.00073035894,0.000033860484,0.09197187,0.00021419008,0.000035630357,0.03749686,0.5288447,0.001764322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01751036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011938535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72140753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051218993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012178497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2521847757","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12237","title":"Judicial Impartiality and Independence in Divided Societies: An Empirical Analysis of the Constitutional Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; British Academy; Queen's University Belfast; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Impartiality; Judicial independence; Political science; Law; Politics; Judicial activism; Independence (probability theory); Dissenting opinion; Judicial discretion; Constitutional court; Loyalty; Judicial opinion; Judicial review; Law and economics; Constitution; Sociology","score_opus":0.05573365378808543,"score_gpt":0.3734158386377754,"score_spread":0.31768218484968996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2521847757","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5673723,0.308061,0.00067703874,0.08456012,0.0007193283,0.002381903,0.0006732424,0.00009731667,0.03545771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90653604,0.091584146,0.000049771043,0.0017378423,0.000056888097,0.000015242128,0.0000016024878,0.0000016386402,0.000016834805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981432,0.00032759877,0.00044994318,0.00021817614,0.00065446325,0.00020659498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906266,0.00026656807,0.00023171285,0.00015937582,0.00021301508,0.0000666567],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016603859,0.00010380458,0.0005357084,0.0000031996408,0.00042149486,0.000009505575,0.00025063418,0.0000999056,0.00012905175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027740494,0.000060978742,0.0004168655,0.0007917614,0.007086486,0.00017227478,0.00012161884,0.000105663006,0.0000013931732],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008489461,0.00013646392,0.3002472,0.00014755319,0.0004228066,4.0165443e-7,0.0018647995,0.0000020051652,0.00010620094,0.6925024,0.002884581,0.0016771433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010853043,0.00010186655,0.74089074,0.00401072,0.0031950164,0.0000020221576,0.0034779334,0.000030001325,0.00011679047,0.09854277,0.14789483,0.0006520197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026958084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060864217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59395957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009713896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005071684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99561566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2523113676","doi":"10.7202/1101141ar","title":"Les aspects juridiques de la redéfinition du statut politique et constitutionnel du Québec","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024130460785965792,"score_gpt":0.29740039814072805,"score_spread":0.27326993735476224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2523113676","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1116989,0.0012334139,0.0017610688,0.1338283,0.0016880325,0.00018291234,0.00037239655,0.0002833796,0.7489516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98106086,0.011257752,0.00018713981,0.0015458881,0.0029040878,0.00008188629,0.000104231316,0.000019943433,0.0028382065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978597,0.00046592052,0.00039557618,0.0003541796,0.0004201741,0.0005044125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812865,0.0009920081,0.00018936921,0.00011174242,0.00037670493,0.0002014984],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012018029,0.00022213692,0.0002529029,0.00019511317,0.0007411489,0.00016439638,0.00036585322,0.0002503932,0.00073777884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016074203,0.00027986302,0.00022321308,0.00039052696,0.0020516498,0.00039967842,0.00010091204,0.0003585435,0.0005023017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033048356,0.00016790524,0.0097334925,0.00003131448,0.00016741229,0.0003009041,0.005822128,0.00035544683,0.000056191726,0.9711643,0.009946608,0.0022212416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023884037,0.000030638155,0.02574908,0.00032149017,0.000050505423,0.00016382581,0.0013709395,0.00040127104,0.000041292707,0.4191749,0.5522079,0.00024930685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6584037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37828293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86936194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025920651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064329426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2525314292","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3959","title":"The Moral Unity of Public Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Philosophy of law; Adjudication; Dignity; Jurisprudence; Public law; Political science; Analogy; Sociology; Political philosophy; Constitutionalism; Law and economics; Morality; Politics; Democracy; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.036241777053454584,"score_gpt":0.24241479684511122,"score_spread":0.20617301979165664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2525314292","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02796861,0.00093708374,0.00024137029,0.006619162,0.00026538057,0.00003949929,0.0000100965435,0.000008811173,0.96391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99809074,0.0011230757,0.000053785163,0.000023171457,0.00008985009,1.0997993e-8,6.252473e-8,7.1685804e-7,0.00061858207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937785,0.00013022446,0.00007067225,0.000040005925,0.00024779412,0.00013342735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939275,0.000111233356,0.00010604409,0.00004838566,0.0002670172,0.00007459577],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004917093,0.000032152613,0.000077372126,0.0000041434737,0.0023563942,0.0000133655285,0.00026988934,0.000027185346,0.00039252164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004190852,0.000020244399,0.00007052662,0.000021645445,0.0021764946,0.00037646343,0.000054491946,0.000038806047,0.0000036581546],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015777168,0.0000170212,0.00162301,3.670149e-7,0.00003411125,0.0000020138566,0.0010899126,1.1265973e-7,0.000031071177,0.9916671,0.00056682917,0.0049526542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000343003,0.00004633671,0.006518138,0.000023881648,0.000020890553,0.0000020343168,0.022408975,2.2460968e-7,0.000026964855,0.050156545,0.92039454,0.000058457048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3444298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80360025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97012216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017864596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012723773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2526842560","doi":"10.4337/9781785365263.00011","title":"Amendment and revision in the unmaking of constitutions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Reinterpretation; Constitutional amendment; Originalism; Amendment; Political science; Law; Skepticism; Presupposition; Scholarship; Constitutionalism; Epistemology; Sociology; Democracy; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.04395632204613078,"score_gpt":0.286041925199235,"score_spread":0.2420856031531042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2526842560","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025251493,0.0014942291,0.000032066237,0.0024659552,0.0004999922,0.00043161787,0.0000256962,0.000024937699,0.994773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89677936,0.00083692843,0.0001404655,0.0010234409,0.0007840647,0.000012976744,0.000017978018,0.000017802235,0.10038698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984829,0.000081392376,0.00032603298,0.00025124536,0.0006407841,0.00021765933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999084,0.0003293849,0.00022404891,0.00017750126,0.00014152341,0.000043521057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014214083,0.00016032161,0.00030580984,0.00013957702,0.0005179772,0.00036399724,0.0003681627,0.00021787628,0.000051549276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003445558,0.00012298043,0.00009116132,0.000038032565,0.0011572755,0.00026011278,0.00015877813,0.000447606,0.000013800135],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004256932,0.0000053711724,0.00012342547,0.000016490172,0.000024689985,0.0000050457584,0.003787821,9.576805e-7,0.0000018855825,0.9838841,0.0033924666,0.008753498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011541863,0.00001736747,0.000094313924,0.00055655837,0.00003464569,0.0000019248441,0.0013173621,4.7667956e-7,0.0000013101389,0.104817875,0.89289784,0.00014488016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029242479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034132684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8965269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012176861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061516603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50149965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528781944","doi":"","title":"Dynamic Regulatory Constitutionalism: Taking Legislation Seriously in the Enforcement of Economic and Social Rights","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Normative; Political science; Statutory law; Constitutionalism; Enforcement; Law; Law and economics; Social rights; Human rights; Politics; Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.012142457486695466,"score_gpt":0.2746214644257774,"score_spread":0.26247900693908194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528781944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9614332,0.0015557056,0.00092572294,0.008032538,0.00023479435,0.0001757852,0.000005388937,0.000010017206,0.027626878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987457,0.00092712365,0.000006062263,0.00004727736,0.00016981206,0.0000036897336,7.2480657e-7,0.0000016051322,0.00009803854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988524,0.000115424315,0.00019661311,0.000085167296,0.00021337398,0.0005370528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966747,0.000073505886,0.00017663796,0.0000312051,0.000036418423,0.000014779026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015850158,0.000060870545,0.00010090985,0.0000539388,0.00085039256,0.000020541003,0.00012318148,0.000041124713,0.00003401001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021819336,0.000036951194,0.00004300035,0.00005193043,0.0007159312,0.0001920724,0.00001539022,0.00018908536,0.000003652431],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013662181,0.000008221604,0.0019379231,4.99728e-7,0.000028953387,5.5455854e-7,0.0018210507,0.000006029401,0.00003906247,0.99192667,0.000013679176,0.004203673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004164045,0.000034461795,0.008651089,0.000021163156,0.000015394477,0.000023287523,0.0046487763,0.0000061187143,0.0000044903463,0.97769463,0.00840741,0.000076761935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004073206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08926702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08519382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090616784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016840287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9273515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529130738","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3038","title":"Compact is Back: The Supreme Court of Canada’s Revival of the Compact Theory of Confederation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Constitutional interpretation; Constitutional theory; Interpretation (philosophy); Politics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03738853155582945,"score_gpt":0.27225591168980307,"score_spread":0.23486738013397362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529130738","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020577418,0.00054307346,0.00016271634,0.03651984,0.00047012963,0.00016703749,0.00007955734,0.0000031373309,0.9414771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99904126,0.00015438611,0.0000072122853,0.00026339304,0.00016185714,2.101935e-7,1.8057621e-7,0.0000028098216,0.00036868194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841535,0.00037917314,0.00033068648,0.00006332247,0.0006381535,0.00017333606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872524,0.00035515125,0.0003849499,0.00010907591,0.0003687361,0.00005683202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010929271,0.000074787735,0.00021688108,0.000010042855,0.0010273627,0.000018305396,0.00032004472,0.0000327706,0.00055562006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017460766,0.0000332389,0.00012277665,0.00005191864,0.0012702902,0.00009476871,0.000024146979,0.00010331091,0.0000018226365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035060373,0.00002531305,0.0050976365,0.0000041858452,0.00008403593,4.484884e-7,0.0008128382,0.000009546091,0.0010922224,0.9856992,0.0068979897,0.00024156203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014636877,0.0001651576,0.09521253,0.0011066372,0.00021887988,0.00003796587,0.010857511,0.000010144244,0.021310741,0.7643049,0.10497278,0.00033911056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7525708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9360302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9784638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009705156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011537488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7901747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529437961","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1184","title":"\"Other Worlds are Actual\": Tully on the Imperial Roles of Modern Constitutional Democracy","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Politics; Law; Democracy; Globalization; Political science; Sovereignty; International law; Sociology; Political economy","score_opus":0.037564204941585,"score_gpt":0.2742108952086062,"score_spread":0.2366466902670212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529437961","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048031364,0.0009836223,0.00070421054,0.013376581,0.00067579234,0.00015114754,0.000042687487,0.000031864176,0.93600273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970293,0.0003989142,0.00009674707,0.0009330284,0.0012788831,0.0000049184123,7.1230414e-7,0.000005674114,0.00025180867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983561,0.00018750767,0.00028068537,0.00013836035,0.0007354763,0.00030184488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990676,0.00025192712,0.00022889236,0.00009497928,0.00024216957,0.00011439912],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048570416,0.0001331417,0.00021322891,0.000037892696,0.0042886105,0.000055597335,0.00032033346,0.000077228324,0.00060170837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021431214,0.00008797142,0.00016689823,0.00012507419,0.0039928365,0.00017951507,0.00004415071,0.0002896009,0.000053846365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075244425,0.00008726556,0.0018046333,8.57004e-7,0.00007471553,0.000024279743,0.0016737975,0.000076322285,0.00013375396,0.99405223,0.0012180539,0.00077885156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049369916,0.000055843186,0.0023529092,0.00009856146,0.000032573604,0.00010341116,0.0017127715,0.000010891551,0.00021062288,0.9491422,0.0455914,0.00019510048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071652387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053367052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.948998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011179127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047969038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529867073","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1396","title":"Book Notes: Laws Dream of a Common Knowledge, by Mariana Valverde","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dream; Law; Political science; Biology; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.01837483454743498,"score_gpt":0.29579932341040394,"score_spread":0.27742448886296894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529867073","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010286141,0.016990306,0.0004995299,0.0043520816,0.00041624033,0.00010339573,0.000020259815,0.000030885836,0.9765587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99619585,0.0017280185,0.00018843886,0.0008262955,0.00046979045,0.00000342003,0.000002316607,0.00000735889,0.00057851645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987187,0.00011091777,0.00030328013,0.00012941602,0.0004113874,0.00032631954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992792,0.000112974,0.0001667472,0.00008455725,0.00018067694,0.00017587203],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047207237,0.00011827791,0.000249943,0.000032881086,0.0016030079,0.00006722047,0.00029018265,0.000092891714,0.00034361056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008811292,0.00010557072,0.00016306792,0.00014989781,0.00084793166,0.00024543994,0.00006006656,0.00024692086,0.00007758616],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001704032,0.0002655987,0.0004016364,0.000004201397,0.00007688298,0.000012963998,0.0016765534,0.000026054544,0.00009159192,0.9855191,0.010241386,0.001666955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008765953,0.00011208674,0.0004963021,0.00015816622,0.00007081591,0.000026435062,0.0010459427,0.0000013744798,0.0004749353,0.4675355,0.5289719,0.00022997316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16249467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34543285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99516726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018097014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029935036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2530328329","doi":"","title":"Unity in the Eye of the Beholder? Reasons for Decision in Theory and Practice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Corporate governance; Welfare; Scale (ratio); Function (biology); Public relations; Qualitative research; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Management; Social science; Geography","score_opus":0.021246594289346832,"score_gpt":0.3419382025029806,"score_spread":0.3206916082136338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2530328329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9220204,0.0058548464,0.0041434993,0.05222963,0.0001953774,0.00039596198,0.0000052021282,0.000004576044,0.015150533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99401724,0.005606557,0.000017596598,0.00015414048,0.00008386428,0.000005501898,2.7731643e-8,0.0000014787634,0.00011357076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985139,0.0006360817,0.000119509,0.00006041264,0.00020449111,0.00046565328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967431,0.0030425359,0.0000843522,0.00005005177,0.00006646216,0.000013507067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009947086,0.00003892026,0.00006621856,0.000026887214,0.00045717342,0.000013385592,0.00019992852,0.00003044791,0.0000029934706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006014249,0.00001692229,0.00003490338,0.0001726165,0.000348955,0.00013862703,0.00002550715,0.0002898723,5.02985e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110643705,0.000030253233,0.0073761544,2.8092623e-7,0.00000984478,2.588228e-7,0.0014195465,4.3942353e-7,0.00002890301,0.9611926,0.000022146502,0.029808942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025764955,0.00004286573,0.02573947,0.000044668985,0.000012225604,0.000011189279,0.022048758,1.5027398e-7,0.00000428041,0.9424325,0.009376457,0.00002977175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012034465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05222139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07199689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002166496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011724344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9650731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2530995183","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2995","title":"A Theory of Quasi-Constitutional Legislation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"Statute; Legislation; Constitution; Law; Political science; Lawmaking; Constitutional law; Constitutional review; Constitutional economics; Supreme court; Constitutional theory; Legislature","score_opus":0.03449057492597083,"score_gpt":0.2851507907978369,"score_spread":0.25066021587186604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2530995183","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015075488,0.0005392511,0.027522912,0.0033375998,0.00050725986,0.000057529127,0.000012368572,0.000020349184,0.96649516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983053,0.0002750164,0.0002844435,0.00011323067,0.0006361153,0.0000023984808,4.0519288e-7,0.0000021891776,0.00038087845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988754,0.00018273377,0.0002215397,0.00008931284,0.00043483826,0.00019617764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992618,0.00021872694,0.00014475024,0.000052079344,0.0002333103,0.00008932014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009777655,0.000066551234,0.00012374914,0.000036862537,0.0011884065,0.00002744985,0.0001477395,0.000054271117,0.00056238036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002498634,0.000043234915,0.00009692978,0.000085476706,0.002634023,0.00032543155,0.000023871316,0.00008163801,0.000056782977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029534654,0.000049736143,0.0015969845,6.7535836e-7,0.000036436566,0.000004794618,0.0003948548,0.000001800431,0.00027916912,0.9855892,0.00018564823,0.011831185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002934189,0.000031799646,0.0010673478,0.00006960745,0.000017531263,0.000019793993,0.0005332222,3.2619303e-7,0.00010898815,0.95048654,0.047294088,0.00007734614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074004754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02987568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9967978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000086268075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000305156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99920934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531627403","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1144","title":"Book Review: The Transformation of the Supreme Court Of Canada: An Empirical Examination, by Donald R. Songer","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Empirical examination; Law; Political science; Transformation (genetics); Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Chemistry; Actuarial science","score_opus":0.02140654501617092,"score_gpt":0.2815864057986351,"score_spread":0.2601798607824642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531627403","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018141234,0.10323656,0.00022982756,0.36543712,0.00033289622,0.00038632218,0.00004059734,0.000009657779,0.5285129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9788406,0.0082012415,0.000008429367,0.012623491,0.0001227675,0.0000018396208,0.0000017783798,0.0000016900253,0.00019818172],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846065,0.0002774311,0.000309196,0.000057913177,0.00074120465,0.00015360468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993273,0.000060406826,0.0001864994,0.0000728833,0.00029289976,0.000059984082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010098367,0.00006367834,0.00014219353,0.000007785025,0.0011547866,0.000016893488,0.0002812938,0.000032761913,0.00016691958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000748375,0.0000353508,0.00007236615,0.00012453881,0.00036396773,0.00023192793,0.000007882266,0.0001520366,5.2141274e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000954568,0.000086001935,0.00023674316,0.000013732276,0.000033387012,8.8363106e-7,0.0026259255,0.000015569807,0.00008135965,0.2902186,0.7030572,0.0036210082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015532084,0.000048518807,0.011242123,0.00020206343,0.00005788731,0.000010721817,0.000932084,0.000009615761,0.00021707792,0.018433806,0.9686072,0.00008357515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38612694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8749042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97702646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001048437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048030412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88818014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531893546","doi":"","title":"Comparative Matters: A Response to Interlocutors","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Conversation; Constitutional law; Comparative law; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.032455940943696505,"score_gpt":0.2972083145682079,"score_spread":0.2647523736245114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531893546","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6794321,0.0002105082,0.0019235582,0.0870584,0.00021221516,0.00019172841,0.000018432114,0.000064326545,0.23088872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931702,0.0000613481,0.00031264863,0.00014974638,0.000032778884,1.8026446e-7,1.1847598e-7,0.000001221117,0.0062717353],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994204,0.000119936536,0.00003604678,0.000112719295,0.00017111082,0.00013978701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957854,0.00013727404,0.00003834989,0.0000682322,0.0000868237,0.00009078342],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020124642,0.00005215343,0.00013333432,0.000019622523,0.00034334563,0.0000051336647,0.00018401726,0.000028223529,0.0062689683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042315132,0.0000456807,0.000050308063,0.000052472675,0.00048406702,0.00024604896,0.000082161656,0.000016576738,0.00017695436],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0041124984,0.00016833465,0.004228232,0.000006644929,0.00028284235,0.000031939868,0.70138806,0.0000026068728,0.015078147,0.1474235,0.066881076,0.060396098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005500808,0.00021007564,0.30408812,0.00011613062,0.000028326032,3.782738e-7,0.24829249,7.538934e-7,0.00010846214,0.000503414,0.44588473,0.00021703483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3723183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34301886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4530956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003197142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009228186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99463946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2532410346","doi":"","title":"Commonalities, intersections, and challenges for the scrutiny and interpretation of legislation in Trans-Tasman jurisdictions and beyond","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian Parliamentary Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Legislation; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Commonwealth; Charter; Human rights; Law; Scope (computer science); Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.06420674695101623,"score_gpt":0.32489390141247376,"score_spread":0.2606871544614575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2532410346","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054069314,0.88216716,0.00023671958,0.05415774,0.00026638666,0.0013364487,0.00006115305,0.000017244654,0.007687853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7050165,0.29461873,0.00005359253,0.00019116889,0.000047380217,0.000054695913,0.0000043864497,0.0000017303197,0.000011839475],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994235,0.00009327696,0.00019113296,0.000088758265,0.00008140307,0.00012189973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996506,0.00018786661,0.000060393377,0.000040425108,0.000020072712,0.00004062304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050791504,0.00006607905,0.00015008329,0.000028659895,0.00027051853,0.000011006099,0.000035544093,0.000025423857,0.0000143667785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027061162,0.000051971794,0.00002707471,0.0000699684,0.00045513368,0.00024389954,0.00001344203,0.000055142722,2.6992308e-7],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037106733,0.00011675231,0.1008833,0.0010621485,0.00017284506,2.8052446e-7,0.04956236,8.8445756e-7,0.000008393359,0.2457416,0.0011427669,0.60127157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006973028,0.0001945966,0.38394904,0.0030308373,0.0005774564,0.000016520513,0.09306757,0.000040898412,0.0000087511,0.011813659,0.5062866,0.00031675847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023288857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011153489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65094715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024067736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017014603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62239087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2533097192","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781316585481","title":"Toward an Informal Account of Legal Interpretation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Ideology; Scope (computer science); Judicial interpretation; Law; Intervention (counseling); Epistemology; Nothing; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics; Politics","score_opus":0.026301018332326658,"score_gpt":0.24022275146615835,"score_spread":0.2139217331338317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2533097192","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004430996,0.00006862265,0.00047529925,0.000038018417,0.00036169233,0.00021488694,0.00022003704,0.00006069099,0.9981176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06364181,0.000117614465,0.000016607604,0.000048484453,0.00033610684,6.881126e-7,0.00002329392,0.0000065349227,0.93580884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899745,0.000065341264,0.00015613221,0.00019142308,0.0003818374,0.00020784402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917734,0.00006069033,0.00020939238,0.00013411761,0.00031814983,0.000100304045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015638172,0.0001499127,0.0002552301,0.000101109625,0.0003622918,0.00003069922,0.00041942627,0.0002096079,0.000005970799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030860083,0.00014831265,0.00012949559,0.000013102657,0.0011129286,0.00039659152,0.00018240428,0.0001503843,0.000009029174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009959075,0.000007763504,0.000007747273,0.000019589863,0.00007043447,0.000017602315,0.0011802274,5.1394437e-7,0.000005308197,0.9833116,0.012074472,0.0032051597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002043001,0.00004287105,0.000080945334,0.00014343155,0.00008281092,8.4454723e-7,0.00075287145,0.0000032754585,0.000029124181,0.000084395295,0.99838376,0.00019135867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052164253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002599263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9863093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002320152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011312196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.788571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2533569193","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1181","title":"Book Notes: Weak Courts, Strong Rights: Judicial Review and Social Welfare Rights in Comparative Constitutional Law, by Mark Tushnet","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Social rights; Judicial review; Welfare rights; Constitutional law; Welfare; Human rights","score_opus":0.03544476319818882,"score_gpt":0.2993659918528684,"score_spread":0.2639212286546796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2533569193","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005011531,0.07232298,0.00013599722,0.018659433,0.000410704,0.0004114267,0.00020065029,0.000043104068,0.90731454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99077237,0.005561413,0.00009175852,0.002645502,0.0007279974,0.00001630568,0.00002783483,0.0000044619755,0.00015236721],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99746215,0.00037735802,0.0005446511,0.0003046754,0.000767656,0.00054351694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999086,0.00012752104,0.0002526891,0.00006534714,0.00025800656,0.00021043497],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000550531,0.0002577678,0.00062004745,0.000049030743,0.0087010255,0.00009356926,0.00024954628,0.00014732173,0.0008170135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027093844,0.00022066572,0.0001344432,0.00014932106,0.006372066,0.0005838926,0.00006615931,0.00055445975,0.000035747842],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031802007,0.00010593589,0.00024606768,0.000011668114,0.000079420446,0.00006469289,0.00077601004,0.0000024706526,0.000002034648,0.95249283,0.046158582,0.00002847149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079529086,0.000046042765,0.000532855,0.00024694746,0.00009791039,0.00013882268,0.00032736346,0.000002859017,0.000006296792,0.07498725,0.9224869,0.00033148384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10001445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26565465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9902712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028059052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028309622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99633205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W253428692","doi":"","title":"The \"Dialogue Theory\" of Constitutional Review in Canada : Recent Challenges","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"法政理論","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.056688460603065795,"score_gpt":0.2855042642556903,"score_spread":0.22881580365262452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W253428692","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030198132,0.40216964,0.000028193865,0.115374856,0.0008152389,0.0003692297,0.000023522547,0.00001259245,0.4781869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7352035,0.2642191,0.000006475258,0.00048409143,0.000056702454,0.000011540605,8.373947e-7,5.8862577e-7,0.000017173617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993003,0.00009304175,0.00014086423,0.00007147222,0.0002554649,0.00013887353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960536,0.00018930016,0.0000432672,0.000053074004,0.00007998934,0.000028981887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000598842,0.000041470365,0.00010265356,0.000007878972,0.0003379913,0.0000031240918,0.00012558444,0.000014867022,0.000045289715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045961997,0.000028165161,0.00002114884,0.00012409344,0.0010432199,0.000026867034,0.000021304078,0.000052816456,0.000006866272],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032832488,0.000008773047,0.00022754112,0.000008198758,0.000007406731,0.0000025661043,0.000264168,0.000011017459,5.8194314e-7,0.9837344,0.00035151994,0.015380519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012738706,0.0000062973113,0.006027008,0.00035448116,0.000008136932,6.056552e-7,0.0027055624,4.4818343e-8,0.000009742496,0.27087316,0.71982235,0.00006523246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80673426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99224484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73218364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032061944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038693878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6864128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2540366584","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1373","title":"Book Notes: The Lawmakers: Judicial Power and the Shaping of Canadian Federalism, by John T. Saywell","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Power (physics); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Physics","score_opus":0.024005789695604022,"score_gpt":0.2560515465511589,"score_spread":0.2320457568555549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2540366584","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020993494,0.022899454,0.00009610415,0.121680036,0.00044339834,0.00020986673,0.000022136355,0.000012946348,0.85253674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98577744,0.0027978264,0.00003214425,0.010901231,0.00039012032,0.0000035839773,6.4249156e-7,0.000005650172,0.00009139276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987189,0.00015513907,0.00023710358,0.00011199821,0.00041971295,0.00035711157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993046,0.00017888406,0.00013146494,0.00007216735,0.00013279045,0.00018009557],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009125116,0.0001057179,0.0001815548,0.00004429119,0.004819295,0.00020884238,0.00027060698,0.00006843606,0.00018017468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015122404,0.000061656254,0.00010294932,0.00018766857,0.0023599712,0.00019283897,0.000038775328,0.00028692736,0.0000112968955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024055544,0.0000117449745,0.000073281284,8.174943e-7,0.000055861623,0.000008481452,0.004749999,0.000018618006,0.000011999097,0.98827237,0.0065171877,0.00025557601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011925352,0.000039393344,0.0003658734,0.000090669964,0.00005906323,0.000042217598,0.006971734,0.0000017060912,0.000044243177,0.3496855,0.6413417,0.0001654025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.956189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9821834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98367804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013009128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048777656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2541255717","doi":"","title":"De la structure constitutionnelle dans le Renvoi relatif à la réforme du Sénat: vers une Gestalt constitutionnelle? (Constitutional Structure and the Senate Reference: Towards a Canadian Constitutional Gestalt?)","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Gestalt psychology; Humanities; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.010459223017638943,"score_gpt":0.23721355908406963,"score_spread":0.2267543360664307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2541255717","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19485609,0.06725772,0.020737901,0.11894715,0.0059754197,0.0014975189,0.0023079424,0.00018704149,0.58823323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97899026,0.017430805,0.00021980499,0.0006659585,0.001363056,0.000016437845,0.00007354434,0.000017767017,0.0012223955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99251264,0.0017473138,0.00082192646,0.0006482532,0.0011640028,0.0031058397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968691,0.0005718152,0.00046624008,0.0002484404,0.0007749289,0.001069484],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005044517,0.0006648387,0.00069077587,0.00037827875,0.0075326813,0.0005218292,0.0006969119,0.00089059083,0.00014764431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015102485,0.00054201233,0.00026539952,0.00127943,0.07740823,0.0009991481,0.00017156973,0.004549699,0.000039633836],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002459986,0.000065939064,0.0030277248,0.000014215357,0.00065879244,0.00015967443,0.003648366,0.0033027192,0.000026307991,0.9857407,0.0018197628,0.0012897988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040151426,0.00008060373,0.00084568135,0.00016859759,0.00033156053,0.0111767305,0.018989533,0.00015394793,0.000013371441,0.74830633,0.21533643,0.00058208406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31812313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.389233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78413415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00590981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11941725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2543164750","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1106","title":"Book Notes: Making Our Democracy Work: A Judge's View, by Stephen Breyer","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Work (physics); Political science; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Law and economics; Engineering; Mechanical engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.02317457589153891,"score_gpt":0.30631276461468493,"score_spread":0.283138188723146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2543164750","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022092098,0.008019483,0.0011282101,0.037138,0.0023927635,0.00021434613,0.000014149489,0.000102304686,0.94878155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99059904,0.0005603787,0.00069758267,0.0051251194,0.0019489664,0.0000069587927,0.0000013982418,0.000014244598,0.0010463222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980273,0.00014430705,0.0003304091,0.00022328082,0.00067660987,0.00059804105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909145,0.000118512435,0.00020373992,0.00012495845,0.00021702047,0.0002443455],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084555376,0.00017824692,0.0002492085,0.00003741525,0.004031926,0.00034291865,0.00043035913,0.0001499657,0.0008155611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002266077,0.00015426081,0.00016459487,0.00019220235,0.00039409037,0.00041759943,0.000096215794,0.00077586237,0.00028129606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003807137,0.0001054747,0.004278503,0.0000037504342,0.00011161773,0.00006292794,0.0014933874,0.0000052846626,0.0003839907,0.9023825,0.07456078,0.01657371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035599843,0.000024931329,0.0009918252,0.0000932793,0.000052732317,0.00004960141,0.0011023281,0.0000021707954,0.00004672404,0.14965618,0.8473186,0.0003056671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0149409445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.087764315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9883898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008780258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021136967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2543956597","doi":"10.3138/utq.85.3.481","title":"<i>The Court of Appeal for Ontario: Defining the Right of Appeal, 1792–2013</i> by Christopher Moore","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.006955729131182362,"score_gpt":0.21063044874440257,"score_spread":0.2036747196132202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2543956597","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44827455,0.013674834,0.007235112,0.03669698,0.0016275105,0.0017814838,0.000756069,0.00008881544,0.48986465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962176,0.00016495032,0.00010002,0.000019590434,0.000035984704,6.041041e-7,0.0000015820968,0.000002151986,0.003457535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999299,0.00005490833,0.00012803022,0.00010651195,0.00024182732,0.00016975007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925506,0.0002436983,0.00018165316,0.00010975494,0.00017243336,0.000037396072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002922056,0.00006681582,0.00015926534,0.000005698537,0.0008027029,0.0000054465872,0.00034449235,0.000048853995,0.00015287075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014272878,0.000041003586,0.00011628589,0.000024273773,0.001251471,0.00014306259,0.000021054744,0.000029706414,0.000004193461],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005415773,0.00019739878,0.009370446,0.000023541892,0.00034764194,0.0000017636839,0.09592051,0.0000012514328,0.0010337901,0.596482,0.25754702,0.03853309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006311422,0.00033593862,0.0054301457,0.00005583589,0.0000648169,1.9959069e-7,0.034101497,0.0000016283132,0.000044782064,0.004551968,0.95467764,0.000104376464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.70905113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90345746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6971307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001862321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019894772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6173823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2546096680","doi":"10.1111/lapo.12062","title":"The Paradox of Docket Control: Empowering Judges, Frustrating Refugees","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Law; German; Political science; Control (management); Constitutional court; Judicial review; Economics; Constitution","score_opus":0.01739250255270737,"score_gpt":0.3375086650642659,"score_spread":0.32011616251155856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2546096680","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19685802,0.0013987598,0.000029235298,0.0542822,0.00025533655,0.0001808274,0.000026740001,0.0000736881,0.7468952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979481,0.00022259906,0.000012520066,0.00052031304,0.00068145886,0.000009832645,1.3781272e-7,0.0000028451882,0.0006021899],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921805,0.00007103772,0.00015731314,0.000089420464,0.00021171501,0.00025248117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938303,0.0003428855,0.00007596924,0.00008922752,0.000060740094,0.00004814721],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003078209,0.0000593294,0.00010814366,0.000009097126,0.0010298011,0.000027916352,0.00017763594,0.000035142624,0.000028064504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040430448,0.000031914864,0.000053744454,0.00011640404,0.0010944841,0.000087067674,0.000026492975,0.000037894082,0.000023711535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000077305085,0.0000061295277,0.0027505339,7.3176136e-7,0.000019228828,5.7436483e-7,0.0004431964,2.8354683e-7,0.00035160527,0.98713773,0.00025825432,0.0090239905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025109109,0.000022831384,0.005804701,0.000034435063,0.000009581609,4.916759e-7,0.00059413223,2.0173567e-7,0.0004999483,0.19837382,0.794321,0.000087749526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026381891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015463348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80109006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048569025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015766844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9801015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2547042486","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2016.1244451","title":"The meta-constitution: amendment, recognition, and the continuing puzzle of supreme law in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Constitutional law; Limited government; Judicial review","score_opus":0.039699736664320764,"score_gpt":0.23535951758762744,"score_spread":0.19565978092330666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2547042486","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18728544,0.0026802795,0.000246102,0.0756589,0.00076360966,0.0004880011,0.000115194336,0.00001686751,0.7327456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99480575,0.00473991,0.000019243835,0.00024675883,0.000055514076,6.0030305e-7,3.5948227e-7,0.0000010834633,0.0001307553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988402,0.00039640436,0.00019097526,0.00007570191,0.00027177852,0.00022493668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885595,0.0006480936,0.0001847992,0.000062960076,0.00016252117,0.000085655665],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011313263,0.000065414315,0.00019226286,0.000018040853,0.002858827,0.00003182917,0.00023031892,0.000022982053,0.00004069096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006964018,0.000033697404,0.00006354198,0.00012309694,0.0024280492,0.00022137965,0.00006623621,0.0001396833,5.197778e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000092814975,0.000006435306,0.0018940192,0.0000011103448,0.00009712386,0.000008864045,0.00058603426,0.0000010141579,0.0000015989095,0.99361736,0.00014050158,0.0035531118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001432001,0.0000149941825,0.0007218564,0.00005814501,0.00014680084,0.000012291198,0.0136373965,7.510306e-7,0.000016501916,0.06412328,0.9197511,0.000084864165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92500615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99794114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9294941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037148804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005396543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2547478282","doi":"10.31228/osf.io/v9tz4","title":"Four Unconstitutional Constitutions and their Democratic Foundations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Democracy; Law; Political science; Action (physics); Constitutional amendment; Constitutional law; Politics","score_opus":0.056870182346047,"score_gpt":0.3151494233881404,"score_spread":0.2582792410420934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2547478282","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01526098,0.00016000602,0.027379097,0.008837578,0.00054570165,0.00017740505,0.000017818791,0.00012495564,0.9474965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964578,0.000083381325,0.0008191902,0.00068877294,0.00060761685,0.000017053411,0.0000032415392,0.0000016922,0.0013212389],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930227,0.00005210189,0.00012902105,0.00015771655,0.00015133583,0.00020753265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993996,0.00016446906,0.00002872937,0.000063867796,0.0002389015,0.000104417246],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023539575,0.00008270768,0.00009651252,0.00005015085,0.0037825743,0.00006966031,0.0000866674,0.000045613782,0.0006205652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000312266,0.00006503855,0.00003524339,0.00023778302,0.0067589483,0.00022266732,0.000033908287,0.000054944605,0.00019975068],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002073426,0.00001574892,0.0033315762,5.244288e-7,0.000022851502,6.681183e-7,0.0006066642,6.0688444e-7,0.000039772112,0.99204725,0.002467278,0.0014650106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019444116,0.00003014351,0.0055451477,0.000017672563,0.000020193776,0.000013646176,0.0037816353,0.00003930371,0.00004718539,0.5911252,0.39900377,0.0001816797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028276283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018959336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9811968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057531593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069784396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2549769496","doi":"10.21991/c9f09d","title":"Symposium Summary: The State of Canada's Constitutional Democracy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Constitution; State (computer science); Public service; Constitutional law; Political science; Corporate governance; Liberal democracy; Law; Service (business); Rule of law; Public administration; Sociology; Management; Politics","score_opus":0.013421334471025649,"score_gpt":0.24380214807491726,"score_spread":0.23038081360389162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2549769496","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008421946,0.0037521499,0.10915994,0.2542765,0.008179921,0.0020431348,0.0032578984,0.0003688806,0.6105396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944845,0.0006875809,0.00018148484,0.0017954627,0.00036297808,0.00009500018,0.000032631822,0.000008991039,0.0023514114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99516815,0.00026063374,0.00097313547,0.0006139036,0.0016797674,0.0013043807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963312,0.0012099117,0.00043461693,0.00043395275,0.0011771271,0.00041314788],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095414754,0.0004437454,0.0005338239,0.00018087961,0.006099157,0.000078791374,0.00087881676,0.0001606581,0.0004281495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014731608,0.00029025652,0.00030944505,0.000696774,0.049184214,0.00074789143,0.00030332437,0.00027511595,0.00009491484],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009551407,0.00008956894,0.015621867,0.0000078544745,0.00019566367,0.000027412569,0.00010993533,0.0003059202,0.00044658812,0.9524803,0.028795972,0.0018233944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012908037,0.00004222391,0.0014127995,0.00034630156,0.00009041733,0.00008795904,0.0014543084,0.0000209574,0.0006460409,0.24299484,0.75097716,0.0006361666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.105441436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34853864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9860625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010157055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02337501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2550987653","doi":"10.21991/c95h3t","title":"Judicial Review of Ministerial Advice to the Crown","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Advice (programming); Confusion; Nothing; Law; Action (physics); Power (physics); Political science; Politics; Sovereignty; Legal advice; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.025708336971098103,"score_gpt":0.3016147067215856,"score_spread":0.2759063697504875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2550987653","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016480399,0.020480389,0.044438437,0.3523956,0.009308958,0.0027398744,0.0013645786,0.0003923671,0.5672318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9819823,0.0048237583,0.0003981556,0.010825117,0.0010602496,0.00019802323,0.000020365258,0.000007957131,0.0006840746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99658054,0.00020973102,0.0008284146,0.00048397624,0.0010960352,0.0008012756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976252,0.00049597997,0.00028564266,0.0003772284,0.00091529975,0.0003006903],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010898326,0.0002992566,0.00049240666,0.00014345859,0.0029554907,0.000047834183,0.0007545418,0.000148602,0.0010243114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029659928,0.00018840891,0.0003304754,0.00075438805,0.013324207,0.00044512792,0.00030062482,0.00014044416,0.0007160401],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010139265,0.00006783009,0.0015922241,0.00005350101,0.000072330404,0.000006582165,0.00011281294,0.000005356965,0.00017156928,0.9253549,0.06869705,0.0037644268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006145229,0.00006145976,0.00046183597,0.0032063783,0.00008813184,0.000030526062,0.00091713737,9.576228e-7,0.00013471025,0.019236263,0.97490823,0.00033986918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013071432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002696279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9803343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028969944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035788422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2551431252","doi":"10.21991/c9nh35","title":"Legislative Vehicles and Formalized Charter Review","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Parliament; Constitutionality; Charter; Legislature; Political science; Law; Compliance (psychology); Public administration; Constitution; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.027164514875267373,"score_gpt":0.29288565910362424,"score_spread":0.26572114422835685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2551431252","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021528185,0.04493989,0.043392245,0.18028472,0.002225479,0.0017697917,0.00052729424,0.00049766205,0.7242101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.975162,0.016789174,0.00033290635,0.006082562,0.00029751414,0.0001696442,0.000020689718,0.0000077115665,0.0011377701],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972042,0.00015850355,0.0005577876,0.0005300721,0.0006957481,0.000853716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837786,0.00037662528,0.00019773163,0.00021890934,0.0004893123,0.00033954295],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068220805,0.00032875186,0.0004670994,0.00014653988,0.003279204,0.000075277865,0.00029112032,0.00016868989,0.0005770172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010392611,0.00023846423,0.00020676045,0.0003637587,0.016876899,0.001251962,0.00019489546,0.00015854865,0.00039519614],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034946337,0.00004489008,0.008634242,0.00002669515,0.0000850659,0.000013198752,0.00014117656,5.9638586e-7,0.00011811775,0.9691249,0.013071417,0.0087047275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001223876,0.00003911198,0.00087556423,0.0014978141,0.000086074295,0.00007122357,0.0008604906,0.0000035026633,0.000055664314,0.1181501,0.8766604,0.0004761606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005427856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080575154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9730092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025285923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015003898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2552659060","doi":"10.21991/c9d101","title":"A Recent History of Government Responses to Constitutional Litigation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Constitution; Settlement (finance); Political science; Witness; Power (physics); Law; Politics; Constitutional right; Constitutional law; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.036030059284368705,"score_gpt":0.27597178288593255,"score_spread":0.23994172360156385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2552659060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015737973,0.0068530883,0.19374052,0.097329855,0.010696534,0.002379269,0.0028850832,0.0004916732,0.669886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909713,0.0010197375,0.0011307428,0.0021591936,0.00038297084,0.00021204508,0.000025986432,0.000009170011,0.004088838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952184,0.0002543385,0.0009676441,0.0007015252,0.0019048858,0.0009532006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969881,0.0007542229,0.0003557776,0.00036774052,0.0009851133,0.0005490565],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010049854,0.00039760882,0.00051932014,0.0002695689,0.001462451,0.000038213097,0.0005169089,0.00024792898,0.0015285107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039974707,0.00033406558,0.0002895529,0.00054356956,0.029621618,0.00078771904,0.00025583204,0.00017392953,0.00048390203],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003447841,0.0001959051,0.018672291,0.0000074628206,0.00011539464,0.000016079837,0.00030093806,0.00003830305,0.0016530061,0.9371864,0.03027549,0.011193925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011600014,0.000101172474,0.0013343655,0.00036468977,0.000059388844,0.000036943205,0.001692244,0.0000041136605,0.00064126647,0.040576026,0.95351696,0.00051280734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050403917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000953754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9752333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004439635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008837468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2553437117","doi":"10.21991/c9895f","title":"Political Accountability in Appointments to the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Legislature; Politics; Law; Accountability; Reputation; Supreme Court Decisions","score_opus":0.024116853473701298,"score_gpt":0.2826322086586384,"score_spread":0.2585153551849371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2553437117","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07272221,0.00061503117,0.020365074,0.28477487,0.003058826,0.0021464261,0.00097402354,0.00012116867,0.61522233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971836,0.000019184505,0.000096603355,0.0021393974,0.00019041469,0.00011092228,0.000007749786,0.0000042582733,0.00024782843],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99663246,0.00015584093,0.00063905295,0.0004196393,0.001043853,0.0011091629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815243,0.0005917124,0.00011625877,0.0002898776,0.00050257007,0.00034712098],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085716,0.00023424298,0.00034701562,0.00012854734,0.0016028753,0.000032108284,0.0005452159,0.00011905588,0.00028163858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018880403,0.00015355986,0.00012933029,0.00055550045,0.008800156,0.00035095375,0.00022255,0.00015183499,0.000070881215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007177445,0.000084572974,0.07521726,0.0000035806343,0.000036250833,0.0000068587196,0.000100639394,0.000043894517,0.000052369254,0.91552573,0.008371745,0.00048531225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015444624,0.000061105784,0.027529057,0.00036672983,0.00004201862,0.000028912134,0.012075822,0.000012697751,0.00042447762,0.2045144,0.7527972,0.000603141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37360984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83442754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9244614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015070662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010163134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2553661545","doi":"10.1017/gov.2016.36","title":"Comparing Same-Sex Marriage in Australia and Canada: Institutions and Political Will","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Government and Opposition","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Politics; Democracy; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.04514752763321838,"score_gpt":0.2827636946839993,"score_spread":0.23761616705078092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2553661545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9799755,0.00007940009,0.00005044975,0.005731571,0.000066869194,0.00007325613,0.00003259699,0.000005251495,0.013985081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993865,0.00012123563,0.000017860655,0.00015367151,0.00007208389,0.0000049211526,9.643396e-7,8.6246774e-7,0.00024190474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946654,0.000024117548,0.00007079746,0.000098256314,0.00019105208,0.00014922509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99983394,0.000040829153,0.000014609327,0.000018682265,0.000007330279,0.000084622065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000087013796,0.000045554723,0.00007036666,0.000007667286,0.00029602565,0.000022471235,0.000018753191,0.000024860547,0.000012927322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026727914,0.000035428544,0.0000054065717,0.000022905493,0.00033040746,0.00013686977,0.000033273387,0.000027106591,5.634147e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074664244,0.0000086707005,0.23374708,0.000002251228,0.0000051833217,0.000004189362,0.0001821758,9.564191e-8,0.00014345636,0.7649256,0.00017701925,0.0007968196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005143019,0.0000251878,0.9607391,0.00008897405,0.000018013585,0.0000034919635,0.0022645476,0.000004837139,0.00006668074,0.01745954,0.018675093,0.00014023838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.720731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87585956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.747466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030414402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007026626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28112867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2553866482","doi":"10.82308/33833","title":"The use of social science evidence in constitutional adjudication: overcoming the challenges of the adversarial system","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Adversarial system; Adjudication; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.08602033592604312,"score_gpt":0.2821905082258253,"score_spread":0.19617017229978218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2553866482","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8557195,0.001681942,0.0000019452852,0.0049651563,0.0018347342,0.0014350372,0.00011452926,0.000060471666,0.13418666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992553,0.0003900006,0.000031472326,0.0001030778,0.0000892262,0.000073353935,2.2959772e-7,0.0000043760933,0.000052989537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99688375,0.0006160717,0.00050065364,0.00029929983,0.0013046777,0.00039554382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969865,0.0015927034,0.0003877558,0.0002839454,0.00068419776,0.00006490859],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027183692,0.0001445193,0.00022624864,0.00006515521,0.0067298207,0.00007329367,0.0010955677,0.00010013956,0.000021550477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003941937,0.00008419921,0.00014196702,0.00089065323,0.009593731,0.0011459403,0.00039077888,0.0003271028,0.000021191643],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018014016,0.000027499962,0.00067045435,0.000011145865,0.000021842929,4.3655817e-7,0.00012493934,0.000022041439,0.0012139675,0.9894254,0.0000046111877,0.008459619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019378975,0.00014840401,0.45930815,0.0026092797,0.00027211284,0.000023656776,0.04326141,0.00018780892,0.0076565384,0.28027493,0.20305249,0.0012673262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066451165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038921721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7091505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005502628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004410809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2554554291","doi":"","title":"The Judge as Politician: Review of In Defense of a Political Court","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.033910931738621766,"score_gpt":0.3537553172220859,"score_spread":0.31984438548346417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2554554291","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25046209,0.3358823,0.0000020177542,0.055643965,0.00051642174,0.0002833283,0.000021825505,0.00000955361,0.3571785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87708735,0.12149555,0.000026803913,0.0009091201,0.00024170203,0.0000027218307,1.10815776e-7,0.0000035322562,0.00023307555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978508,0.00023443048,0.00079399627,0.00007879568,0.00069356407,0.00034846232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827695,0.0006043161,0.0003024544,0.00007845617,0.0006519938,0.00008585199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015107162,0.00010281291,0.0005662821,0.000054140302,0.00038263077,0.000011612539,0.00025476492,0.000036174046,0.00005850894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017148926,0.000064986874,0.00020151962,0.00031479786,0.0017647317,0.00012640397,0.00004827563,0.00018066823,0.00000863882],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007681528,0.00010917289,0.0028538257,0.00014860465,0.00021111027,0.000044916414,0.0024687015,0.0000015880807,0.0000047351373,0.9875299,0.003395053,0.0031555882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010250786,0.0006576893,0.02503078,0.0091776885,0.0004032071,0.00010057118,0.038126603,6.2120665e-7,0.000112388996,0.15521409,0.76981306,0.00033822661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055737966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025089653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8323158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011550167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049337454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84259504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2554928324","doi":"10.21991/c9ht18","title":"A Project to Reduce Canadians' Constitutional Illiteracy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); House of Commons; Constitution; Opposition (politics); Political science; Democracy; Law; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Citizenship; Parliament; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.030062421665450312,"score_gpt":0.30633203005157505,"score_spread":0.27626960838612474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2554928324","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007043526,0.0015627577,0.1734193,0.1320356,0.007313328,0.0030602987,0.002700236,0.00087912293,0.67198586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98805314,0.0002362616,0.0017236876,0.0054784147,0.0010238551,0.00047209155,0.000068991074,0.000014957949,0.0029285732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99443966,0.00023246965,0.0009326845,0.0011064311,0.0014111269,0.0018776054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99654025,0.00058549887,0.00023012504,0.00047627342,0.001191366,0.00097646797],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008231628,0.00059396104,0.0005986753,0.0006920467,0.0057990616,0.0002329362,0.000824932,0.00033508035,0.0010362099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028296597,0.00048513655,0.00038690108,0.001360955,0.029677974,0.0014272108,0.0002913828,0.00029031938,0.001940849],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012812468,0.00012800473,0.009182148,0.00000626992,0.00013395966,0.00007094237,0.00038949173,0.00004551532,0.0005270452,0.9426484,0.04082356,0.005916528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013721032,0.00007057236,0.0006027961,0.0004138184,0.00006096004,0.00015243381,0.0029765782,0.0000047835647,0.0001684419,0.057859577,0.93543583,0.0008820899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011915009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0138396565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98100966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016122533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013846953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2559417282","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12218","title":"Judicialization of Environmental Policy and the Crisis of Democratic Accountability","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Polity; Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Politics; Sanctions; Law and economics; Political science; Supreme court; Public administration; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.08035788296295691,"score_gpt":0.4559302898582831,"score_spread":0.37557240689532617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2559417282","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3097743,0.23877122,0.00013385405,0.2497306,0.00009740455,0.0038067894,0.00036418528,0.000020529726,0.1973011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7683781,0.23127455,0.0000056442377,0.00014341151,0.00014801555,0.000012385575,2.9886897e-7,0.0000015819064,0.000036039455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979916,0.00073687243,0.00031649388,0.00009631134,0.0006852637,0.00017342322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864197,0.0009020655,0.00012339608,0.000136985,0.00015541115,0.00004020167],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035135536,0.000046524423,0.0002702596,0.00008922111,0.00023959459,0.000003406153,0.000189501,0.00002847001,0.00008344035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035904434,0.000024299743,0.000069432885,0.0005390792,0.004302069,0.00006838918,0.0001277127,0.000043323198,0.0000042789397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027602888,0.000056920773,0.004053396,0.0006582148,0.000031555926,6.0399714e-8,0.0014819142,1.826353e-8,0.0006877939,0.93533754,0.0009316579,0.05673335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015247414,0.00019944948,0.062000412,0.0074920487,0.00012226608,0.0000016962006,0.007435991,0.0000020477635,0.0018966199,0.86640733,0.052682023,0.00023537796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039644107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006391635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45860377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011069103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055645773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99840766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2559641857","doi":"10.1515/lehr-2016-0013","title":"Fragile Trust: Muslim Communities in Canada and the R v. NS Decision","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Ethics of Human Rights","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Charter; Political science; Harm; Sincerity; Sociology","score_opus":0.04159052388061111,"score_gpt":0.31012315282390857,"score_spread":0.26853262894329744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2559641857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9297551,0.000252304,0.0000068916856,0.004632565,0.00012702793,0.0000935901,0.000010873422,0.000006849931,0.06511479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999203,0.0002001355,0.000011007008,0.00040117707,0.000051118743,0.000005327345,5.48752e-7,0.0000016631981,0.00012598104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899757,0.0002711162,0.00015871534,0.00006515452,0.00036680672,0.00014065548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974297,0.0022867748,0.00005017992,0.0001059791,0.00009646339,0.00003086655],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009226609,0.000056337176,0.00013949958,0.000011694678,0.0019858459,0.000014464479,0.00021238448,0.00006135437,0.000089475514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000078112775,0.000027594151,0.00002243159,0.000051146246,0.003377817,0.00007179693,0.00006895478,0.00020403741,0.000001806549],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010299152,0.0000062094173,0.0013304405,0.0000015647331,0.0000067626943,0.0000012384484,0.018245565,3.637075e-7,0.0000025963202,0.9801188,0.00009042316,0.00018574625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004043374,0.000008731307,0.0037933965,0.00010005519,0.0000050967415,1.470106e-7,0.006214221,5.0662925e-7,0.000027907116,0.9450232,0.04436329,0.00005910657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9976722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99994224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.069447935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009250784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032795966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560105731","doi":"","title":"James B. Kelly, Governing with the Charter: Legislative and Judicial Activism and Framer’s Intent, Vancouver, UBC Press, 2005","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Persée (Ministère de lEnseignement supérieur et de la Recherche)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legislature; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04768109411912226,"score_gpt":0.3238712102908605,"score_spread":0.2761901161717383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560105731","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5610555,0.0042286683,0.0017483813,0.02303912,0.00017406211,0.0007321086,0.000056579593,0.0001545402,0.40881106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914461,0.0023132293,0.0008135536,0.0016503037,0.0004146497,0.000084359555,0.000005915044,0.000020646808,0.0032512392],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99718386,0.0012696327,0.00017587995,0.00037968805,0.0004465845,0.000544327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99776113,0.0017567814,0.00014619633,0.00012594205,0.000094125084,0.00011584267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022646785,0.00024961962,0.00026777727,0.000035580902,0.0010727094,0.0002139917,0.00018570166,0.0002407461,0.000049197362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044127068,0.00018948517,0.00006247132,0.00013559316,0.0017993784,0.00023881746,0.00011679531,0.00066127605,0.000003983585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004577798,0.00034074613,0.015713183,0.000042845073,0.0003681994,0.00009848086,0.7052306,0.000030282095,0.00083131256,0.13242836,0.13402446,0.010433732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062821846,0.00012757028,0.008372792,0.00007543077,0.00011043779,0.000011710981,0.051128097,0.000042876603,0.000091033784,0.00823277,0.93087155,0.0003075425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05969843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08467563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79684705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000377704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000565184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9465631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560454368","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3053","title":"Book Note: The End of the Charter Revolution: Looking Back from the New Normal by Peter J McCormick","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Expansive; Supreme court; Political science; Economic Justice; Narrative; Sociology; History; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.013121076446453496,"score_gpt":0.2392946275192309,"score_spread":0.2261735510727774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560454368","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012885159,0.0134468805,0.0013415749,0.17272894,0.0017287997,0.00024393176,0.00006668623,0.000016124615,0.80913854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98744226,0.001098651,0.000038522576,0.0046907007,0.002321799,0.0000023331204,4.5820178e-7,0.0000055563546,0.004399719],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985638,0.00022594396,0.00024742945,0.000115395786,0.0005597351,0.00028769198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991588,0.0002941093,0.00020609751,0.00016286391,0.00010066727,0.00007747209],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000494636,0.000104177474,0.00012609195,0.000005923481,0.002407234,0.00007960348,0.0006043492,0.000059438098,0.0022637644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007502905,0.000039318795,0.00016916267,0.000078730016,0.0013941576,0.0002902605,0.000114853065,0.00023694425,0.00013344058],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042801606,0.00003278544,0.0038095745,0.0000010804421,0.000114723116,0.0000026583618,0.003326028,0.0000019701286,0.0012462286,0.5572575,0.4258165,0.008348159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029460152,0.000016147045,0.004753443,0.00011054149,0.000042727417,0.000013664755,0.0003365578,8.1036666e-7,0.00026679138,0.061872672,0.9322008,0.00009123376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057287358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.105912715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9861537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008712123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021915941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2565145981","doi":"","title":"Judicial activism in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Docs.school Publications","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Judicial activism; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.0570380397972999,"score_gpt":0.3098555672352147,"score_spread":0.2528175274379148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2565145981","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07528194,0.00028750647,0.00011989186,0.07510039,0.0006241002,0.0002611792,0.000025121211,0.00007959127,0.8482203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977618,0.000034507764,0.00006619864,0.0008276544,0.00040728116,0.000082890925,0.000010659982,0.0000033572815,0.0008056934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989112,0.0000752696,0.00015875763,0.0001547603,0.00042685107,0.00027313776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922955,0.00007148304,0.00004857243,0.00011652634,0.00024227813,0.000291592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032041364,0.00006470434,0.00010157613,0.00008222376,0.0004137407,0.000062100306,0.00023411424,0.000035091434,0.00021738817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012625525,0.00006687068,0.000021020218,0.0007377097,0.00015956067,0.00033585966,0.0000442756,0.00013078346,0.00012553661],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040600275,0.000042468688,0.12760215,4.332779e-7,0.0000118168045,0.0000017601459,0.0009146403,0.000020611424,0.00000389121,0.7226835,0.14693944,0.0017752236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001646704,0.0000038991902,0.17313817,0.000003819579,0.0000045130123,4.167797e-7,0.0052917553,0.000007643753,0.0000029028054,0.03434235,0.78693193,0.0001079306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9922616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9224798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012124539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011431468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9941728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2565454016","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2981","title":"Book Review: Nothing To Lose But Our Chains: On Constitutional Disobedience, by Louis Michael Seidman","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Law; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03364380270610402,"score_gpt":0.3113250222835879,"score_spread":0.2776812195774839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2565454016","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015420615,0.10582074,0.0015681195,0.09443835,0.0017381572,0.00039359322,0.00008147373,0.000073872136,0.7957315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81522596,0.021594677,0.00044861736,0.15072164,0.0034227304,0.00004419867,0.000013401659,0.000017670542,0.00851108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744946,0.00017710132,0.00039037436,0.00028215363,0.0011675402,0.000533374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985599,0.00006098784,0.00017735592,0.00011940584,0.00040382383,0.0006785416],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012230908,0.00020337258,0.0003195719,0.000057975765,0.0022748052,0.00017136983,0.0004210914,0.00008642113,0.00016884597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057244964,0.00017354861,0.00013875516,0.00022001356,0.00082805805,0.00041965573,0.00009633453,0.0003949342,0.00048256418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019263902,0.000072932125,0.000077765435,0.000006342741,0.00002657996,0.000034127548,0.00082530524,0.000018525632,0.000014515615,0.59511477,0.4033505,0.00043936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032067642,0.000100380916,0.000020821648,0.00067347666,0.000032881308,0.000048387537,0.0017188931,0.0000035848266,0.000021173359,0.012148823,0.98466045,0.00025047336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015400196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008139625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81507176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034278416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005246979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2566042272","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1512","title":"The Constitutional Legacy of Chief Justice Brian Dickson","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitution; Democracy; Federalism; Political science; Economic Justice; Jurisdiction; Separation of powers; Constitutional law; Value (mathematics); Rule of law; Disadvantaged; Judicial review; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.02183456482663942,"score_gpt":0.2871132256434757,"score_spread":0.26527866081683626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2566042272","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030802363,0.0021635129,0.00017975834,0.0057229856,0.0006665469,0.00007423387,0.0000090141,0.000018203194,0.9880855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949614,0.0026135019,0.000120445664,0.00031657593,0.0012020732,0.0000026858197,9.3301435e-7,0.000002804595,0.00077960134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985723,0.00015005964,0.00028062746,0.00010280122,0.00058665196,0.00030756835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992819,0.00021215156,0.00011644422,0.000075210904,0.00018201453,0.00013228407],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007461771,0.000088360335,0.00013874477,0.000016949309,0.005903729,0.00017916138,0.0003006865,0.00005480565,0.0008786738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014341444,0.00006197886,0.00011530461,0.00013905125,0.0041187312,0.00032181837,0.000022786759,0.00023948975,0.0000896197],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035233476,0.00004190541,0.00022793953,0.0000015348278,0.000044392058,0.000010929862,0.00041346127,0.00004305471,0.000013232982,0.9825315,0.0009549987,0.015681833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036979365,0.000039452363,0.001689776,0.000055450193,0.00008905271,0.00007740573,0.002263694,0.000005941485,0.00002490542,0.32030118,0.6749518,0.00013154489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038050093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.095197365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99188113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006792427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003750538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2571300394","doi":"","title":"The New Parliamentary Sovereignty","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Parliamentary sovereignty; Parliament; Sovereignty; Political science; Charter; Law; Popular sovereignty; Legislature; Constitution; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.01204770562145398,"score_gpt":0.2633679489324555,"score_spread":0.25132024331100156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2571300394","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.069667876,0.052912027,0.014113194,0.37924302,0.0032857757,0.00044585843,0.000006644018,0.00016289279,0.48016274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95425695,0.03661775,0.0000071213153,0.00023346332,0.00145963,0.0000017131407,7.289299e-8,0.0000031072798,0.007420214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801505,0.00008271193,0.00011605718,0.0000781411,0.00031744887,0.0013905932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996117,0.00014539578,0.00006109181,0.000051763927,0.000046720383,0.00008336833],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012592316,0.000059230915,0.00006232488,0.000013301282,0.0022048086,0.000052603096,0.00025072574,0.000027348928,0.00012392996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014035124,0.000028405339,0.00007156411,0.00008177784,0.00034938497,0.0001487586,0.000027071123,0.00030965052,0.000110981055],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013446818,0.0000050100502,0.0009229182,3.552823e-8,0.00004937999,5.248666e-7,0.00012054989,8.541953e-8,0.000013342832,0.84190065,0.0027560913,0.15421799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001505767,0.000028508952,0.00029072474,0.000005900737,0.000007665614,0.000008438856,0.0045861537,3.4496303e-8,0.000007029296,0.75393325,0.24093705,0.000044647273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038247393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049252454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8845891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082044094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045285616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2571779453","doi":"","title":"Review of Shaping Nations: Constitutionalism and Society in Australia and Canada by L Cardinal and D Headon (eds)","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Political science; Sociology; Law; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.07804265640210283,"score_gpt":0.32272290045709745,"score_spread":0.2446802440549946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2571779453","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018633733,0.8121594,0.0000015889462,0.0044725128,0.00017269109,0.0010329202,0.096619494,0.000027384494,0.066880286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9785949,0.019341247,0.00004256521,0.0009760698,0.00003362002,0.000041241776,0.0008894799,0.0000017630949,0.00007909596],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953693,0.000037255377,0.00010025687,0.00009688923,0.00013552727,0.000093153016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997341,0.00009409849,0.000034918958,0.000019539313,0.00007508261,0.00004228579],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001077001,0.000047864003,0.00010951532,0.000010093599,0.0002719727,0.000011242497,0.000024219591,0.000028212318,0.0014122234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007397007,0.00004725964,0.000013699989,0.00010265037,0.0001285914,0.000069036134,0.000017807495,0.000046600762,9.726504e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013841857,0.000014717583,0.007464888,0.0015992469,0.000040310402,0.0000041242974,0.0006073599,7.928506e-7,0.000011292016,0.2017213,0.78788435,0.00065021764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013294161,0.000004804404,0.00845988,0.0073659644,0.000009746264,0.0000040919704,0.0004864955,0.000001186756,0.000007698051,0.00088904554,0.98253226,0.00010586267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38049152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34263152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9599612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004762612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039012908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99950063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2572350151","doi":"10.3138/utlj.4216","title":"Why judges should dissent","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Dissent; Political science; Judicial opinion; Transparency (behavior); Law; Indeterminacy (philosophy); Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.04189442167510912,"score_gpt":0.29010924771984514,"score_spread":0.24821482604473602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2572350151","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014555329,0.0006904135,0.0001292889,0.012135619,0.0003694671,0.000033893582,0.0000043411465,0.000009792699,0.9720718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977152,0.00095443183,0.00015355222,0.000133558,0.00024042871,1.11524665e-8,1.8233088e-7,0.0000010267158,0.0008016466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950093,0.000034303237,0.000048502323,0.000056541518,0.00023831887,0.00012137692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999576,0.00001861962,0.00011762725,0.000076704244,0.0001204588,0.000090634174],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018071834,0.000039021732,0.00008907221,0.0000045433953,0.005745553,0.00005542196,0.0003700323,0.000034125434,0.0013993139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044298158,0.00003908174,0.00007840117,0.000004898148,0.0011152206,0.00051115605,0.000079231635,0.00005961035,0.00000953675],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003218494,0.000043029264,0.010222778,0.0000013015485,0.00006409827,0.00003738373,0.0047559794,0.0000015690986,0.000023767992,0.9575305,0.023981165,0.0033062522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020515776,0.00001713345,0.024526017,0.000019261535,0.00002869027,0.0000024923231,0.018927837,7.400295e-7,0.000007551648,0.0072959913,0.9489001,0.00006900977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5178304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79247814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98315984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016869833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005880157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99951357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2574510694","doi":"","title":"Expanding our Constitutional Horizons: A Comprehensive Study of Quasi-Constitutionality in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Political science; Law; Constitution","score_opus":0.022291700940997777,"score_gpt":0.26164703427324376,"score_spread":0.23935533333224598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2574510694","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7734628,0.00018235706,0.00001422546,0.010792156,0.002018403,0.0012115942,0.00045960437,0.000084484716,0.2117744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98569995,0.00038222663,0.000039649156,0.0000336791,0.000151701,0.0000047005174,0.00021618664,0.000007723172,0.013464185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976138,0.00033708595,0.000306077,0.00049183716,0.0008577237,0.00039351714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986457,0.00018107724,0.00049540517,0.00025414987,0.00025049003,0.00017317027],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008178288,0.00029966593,0.0006451966,0.000299171,0.0017970041,0.00006007325,0.0006721114,0.00020640106,0.00012899455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015027815,0.00035626173,0.00012912547,0.00041235812,0.00084320124,0.00088409986,0.000121834215,0.00042424997,0.0000082722445],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056438684,0.00083236425,0.29684693,0.00010633609,0.0004914993,0.00074048445,0.0072322492,0.000101147554,0.0000027802287,0.6571848,0.035467368,0.00042965595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016305781,0.00014310949,0.25424427,0.00063429336,0.00020209131,3.4374324e-7,0.5930583,5.176817e-7,0.000045490266,0.0030175017,0.14616539,0.0008581122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9935775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9826277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6541673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010099818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017752536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2576008894","doi":"10.3138/utlj.4217","title":"Ten theses on dissent","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Dissenting opinion; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.028879671997048793,"score_gpt":0.27744498722907146,"score_spread":0.24856531523202266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2576008894","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025566814,0.00020831008,0.000022873688,0.0032821915,0.00023924884,0.00002516473,0.0000032864605,0.000006067751,0.970646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99790496,0.00065741176,0.00006363445,0.000031142667,0.00019192684,8.523019e-9,8.467549e-8,7.469693e-7,0.0011500847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995838,0.000030891162,0.000036634367,0.000047308993,0.00020519817,0.000096191965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996637,0.000026440764,0.00009869624,0.00006718252,0.00007801046,0.00006597457],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014921725,0.00003243513,0.000071236675,0.0000039399115,0.0049647274,0.000041221454,0.00030370784,0.00002280826,0.0006245131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005060047,0.000029626246,0.000062913925,0.0000034319282,0.00084698776,0.00029685075,0.00004785064,0.000046930905,0.000012046156],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003769163,0.000037452177,0.0030929656,5.088146e-7,0.000036805708,0.000022771612,0.0034834861,0.0000014972829,0.000009411032,0.98574907,0.0012868199,0.006241515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033759038,0.0000855957,0.09235202,0.00006665141,0.00003447141,0.0000027710078,0.037012458,0.0000011776926,0.000018165281,0.015289658,0.8546918,0.00010764708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37905595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49178115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97233814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013716806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000511904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W25776318","doi":"10.82308/51751","title":"The transition to constitutional democracy : judging the Supreme Court on gay rights","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Democracy; Transition (genetics); Political science; Law; Gay rights; Constitutional court; Constitution; Politics","score_opus":0.026492209367508162,"score_gpt":0.27120980138428524,"score_spread":0.2447175920167771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W25776318","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43518975,0.00023784896,0.000017911852,0.03716864,0.0012426437,0.00091519987,0.00028494408,0.00025670702,0.52468634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948256,0.000121888654,0.00013316628,0.0037596081,0.00043172488,0.00007060029,0.0000068088857,0.000010405243,0.00064018817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99700516,0.0004427507,0.00038305347,0.00042593668,0.0010778576,0.00066524756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982748,0.000815761,0.000103207574,0.00025975617,0.00030289215,0.00024355942],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017407242,0.0002521043,0.00020853913,0.00007443168,0.019263772,0.00015085241,0.0005851169,0.00012640696,0.00017395781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058311806,0.00016296834,0.00018352838,0.00048250373,0.0016469818,0.00051608874,0.0000853815,0.000509727,0.0008915282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005720032,0.00006604643,0.000023799483,0.000001203817,0.000052123734,0.000006492557,0.00006938812,0.00032478367,0.00036723423,0.97283745,0.00012064674,0.026073603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025570916,0.000040661835,0.000722008,0.00005107327,0.00003836711,0.000007029989,0.00042391708,0.000013636918,0.0010580829,0.2126916,0.78444195,0.00025596775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017316899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012914111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7843213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006395335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000120458724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2578785134","doi":"","title":"General principles of the Canadian constitutional law","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publications Doc Du Juriste","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitutional law; Political science","score_opus":0.033193645976691805,"score_gpt":0.27416163691064566,"score_spread":0.24096799093395385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2578785134","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018743724,0.00013281468,0.000012142223,0.042023104,0.00016349964,0.00016287842,0.0000766944,0.000030303967,0.93865484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99047786,0.00005914274,0.00012662935,0.0008526095,0.00026807009,0.00004215864,0.000008934885,0.0000016747299,0.008162903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991891,0.00006366232,0.0001618432,0.00011314921,0.00027770695,0.00019453668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940604,0.00003872371,0.0000478568,0.00014941531,0.00024306505,0.00011488985],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002492396,0.000054069136,0.00007185685,0.00003845485,0.0027223288,0.000069884365,0.00031776226,0.00004445789,0.001198729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011648979,0.000042558422,0.000063950654,0.00039350186,0.0036971257,0.000150726,0.000024226598,0.000064852495,0.00009023602],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.588964e-7,0.000019440113,0.0119752195,5.3338465e-7,0.000012197582,1.0951755e-7,0.0003206912,0.000030519874,0.0000017053662,0.98480105,0.002363307,0.0004744898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046963298,0.0000015927483,0.0636353,0.0000037850748,0.000008517252,0.0000012803474,0.000052556377,0.0000063398224,0.000006416523,0.014581316,0.9216047,0.000051251067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47878394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.794513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97173417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017568236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018487812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2579109160","doi":"10.3138/utlj.4262","title":"The role of dissents in appellate judging","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Dissenting opinion; Political science; Variety (cybernetics); Law; Concurrence; First amendment; Supreme court; Computer science","score_opus":0.010881212267710706,"score_gpt":0.24792491752561457,"score_spread":0.23704370525790386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2579109160","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.179595,0.001354465,0.000012523994,0.00078611256,0.00015523749,0.0000317517,0.0000016314468,0.000002030951,0.81806123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984775,0.0012534494,0.000025963975,0.0000027296567,0.00004695655,5.5242086e-9,3.4105575e-8,5.098409e-7,0.00019283868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962944,0.000034664416,0.00005575675,0.00003269056,0.00015423025,0.0000932079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996879,0.000027705793,0.00013827166,0.000052615727,0.00006208586,0.000031381147],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002710574,0.000023572191,0.00006558494,0.0000039563915,0.0030179613,0.000022561379,0.000308553,0.000017946435,0.00006229578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033349374,0.000019959505,0.00004289337,0.0000063877555,0.0007752727,0.00023345779,0.00006160385,0.000044495737,0.0000013750544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004963165,0.000027489574,0.08121553,9.0044233e-7,0.00003731791,0.000008884131,0.008026915,0.000006415242,0.000091914495,0.889981,0.00006817901,0.020485861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065066316,0.000036764246,0.32592377,0.00013121254,0.000033150405,0.0000023954085,0.1490638,0.000019829436,0.00010662026,0.06921573,0.45468998,0.00012609882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43597156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.72671014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82076526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000087528635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000483084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2579387497","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2820190","title":"Le rrle constitutionnel de la Cour suprrme du Canada: autoportrait (A Self-Portrait of the Supreme Court of Canada)","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Portrait; Art; Art history","score_opus":0.006653891738716762,"score_gpt":0.20234837426468696,"score_spread":0.19569448252597021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2579387497","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8119017,0.027145142,0.0005560879,0.043657772,0.0023803592,0.0003081931,0.00017757609,0.000018544051,0.11385465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885868,0.0087706065,0.000030053221,0.00022502475,0.00052692747,0.0000029967596,0.0000012829315,0.000009085755,0.0018472625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959035,0.00037122477,0.00058768434,0.00017456854,0.0011329466,0.0018300544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985555,0.00021429932,0.00049695966,0.00012051286,0.0004390647,0.00017367079],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020173932,0.00019830561,0.00039488092,0.00003284529,0.0022162187,0.0000115043995,0.0005107087,0.00013739463,0.0000783802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029268998,0.00017282997,0.00019013912,0.00040496714,0.00303993,0.00014166889,0.000056668952,0.0011644907,6.022397e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015252626,0.00014246641,0.03680682,0.000010544715,0.00041671382,0.00004327949,0.0007346592,0.00030814737,0.000039913513,0.9548285,0.0064940373,0.00015967831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018482574,0.00020883145,0.13580813,0.00023766217,0.0004990379,0.005914546,0.029213678,0.0000997629,0.0003835688,0.33829018,0.4867467,0.0007496524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99504066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99935305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6165383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004009188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.38296705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2580752897","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1364","title":"Book Notes: Constitutional Politics in Canada and the United States, by Stephen L. Newman (ed)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.013028585514775365,"score_gpt":0.2397355372746231,"score_spread":0.22670695175984773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2580752897","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037692912,0.042707924,0.0022549958,0.13141666,0.0014420763,0.00070757273,0.00032746408,0.00005630755,0.7833941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881376,0.0030876198,0.00005221524,0.00839161,0.00022017227,0.0000039563133,0.000010575663,0.0000030790238,0.00009318887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867994,0.00013856885,0.00024205958,0.000107516986,0.00047409776,0.0003578059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993279,0.00023971802,0.0000858791,0.000048893187,0.00012189365,0.00017570164],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040256535,0.0001023682,0.0001583664,0.000028654684,0.0019865402,0.00010226178,0.0001705523,0.000039008086,0.00009698621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011683259,0.000073950396,0.000033030145,0.00013737139,0.002918627,0.00015148654,0.000039631916,0.0002838421,0.000004770523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017147415,0.00001742883,0.0014737711,0.0000011313178,0.000028886789,0.00003125835,0.00068580644,0.000599748,6.61636e-7,0.9931069,0.003975592,0.000061648025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002321586,0.000017888502,0.0006644786,0.00007038382,0.000029077333,0.00006135163,0.0044151554,0.000020967194,0.000006441887,0.51401687,0.47818333,0.00019250743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9989747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9504447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007500227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024858322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2581244033","doi":"10.21036/ltpub10012","title":"Do Constitutional Courts Use Balancing to Promote Judicial Activism?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Latest Thinking","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial activism; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Judicial review; Sociology","score_opus":0.04764335935563118,"score_gpt":0.32276565853644124,"score_spread":0.27512229918081005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2581244033","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7710371,0.00011073269,0.0013787283,0.013436158,0.0024502932,0.00048347432,0.00002562272,0.00022738481,0.21085052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99708986,0.000028119226,0.0010093226,0.0006132893,0.0010581687,0.000012915327,0.0000021826825,0.000005427833,0.00018073047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858016,0.000041549916,0.00015837037,0.00026862114,0.0005621026,0.00038919755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992524,0.00011467722,0.00013014695,0.00019600631,0.00016308896,0.00014370165],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006090708,0.00012437359,0.00019024432,0.000045446526,0.007243331,0.00075730635,0.00040971403,0.00008523155,0.00007676411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013066758,0.000119933145,0.000062116334,0.000074474396,0.0012839315,0.0006866494,0.00021465097,0.00016332537,0.00015461128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013097173,0.000027780845,0.052477572,0.0000016197722,0.00003123241,0.000034335782,0.004676233,0.000026219308,0.0001589154,0.9395187,0.0006712533,0.0023630797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048604942,0.000050383664,0.19860867,0.0004846139,0.000061964856,0.000010380699,0.0008387547,0.00002728801,0.00019868427,0.40557632,0.39302757,0.00062930293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008035208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00282599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53394234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014190578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003589306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2581548206","doi":"10.36939/cjur/vol25no2/art42","title":"Bylaw Battles: Explaining Municipal-Provincial and Municipal-Federal Win-Rates","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of urban research","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Ultra vires; Political science; Context (archaeology); Public administration; Corporate governance; Zoning; Law; Geography; Business","score_opus":0.1221807127966619,"score_gpt":0.37449392881454885,"score_spread":0.2523132160178869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2581548206","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92113286,0.004018157,0.000009678882,0.006961006,0.00040030872,0.00012989364,0.000027622202,0.000006865418,0.06731359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99735296,0.0003405222,0.00004469068,0.00012078746,0.0010047916,0.0000041485205,3.224621e-7,0.000008306564,0.0011234458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759287,0.000545973,0.00028199735,0.00015140731,0.000650618,0.00077714806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974288,0.0008571453,0.00008036603,0.000104946346,0.0005587884,0.00096996996],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003366051,0.00009747793,0.00021635376,0.00035384737,0.0023870578,0.00018726832,0.00044576454,0.00009489405,0.00038942066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002349113,0.00007054231,0.000068126574,0.0003278858,0.00284366,0.0002900875,0.00005916013,0.00034616687,0.000041263505],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000114849805,0.000028094164,0.32343984,0.000013405525,0.0001425027,0.0005567957,0.043853,0.000001834543,0.00030229212,0.58680004,0.033271696,0.011475668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009831182,0.00037242574,0.043201394,0.0005889717,0.000018131332,0.00004156187,0.040654592,0.000003909357,0.000072446004,0.034166016,0.87957484,0.00032258508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23315543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6185794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84630316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042018425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036902383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2581998729","doi":"","title":"The Supreme Court in Canada's constitutional order","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitution; Constitutionalism; Law; Political science; Constitutional court; Majority opinion; Constitutional law; Original jurisdiction; Sociology; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.027541976877775282,"score_gpt":0.249645461380737,"score_spread":0.22210348450296172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2581998729","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030650977,0.09657668,0.0056532044,0.42676562,0.01930855,0.0014485857,0.0007783902,0.00012443916,0.41869354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97505647,0.018636698,0.00013581166,0.0004962555,0.0011182653,0.0000746239,0.00000618691,0.000008401872,0.0044672657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967497,0.00032984745,0.00073303335,0.00052154966,0.0006918292,0.00097404275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970969,0.0016791064,0.00020825808,0.00027859627,0.00049138814,0.00024575833],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000780984,0.0003553657,0.00042333474,0.00007121699,0.0027255455,0.00009108689,0.0005801704,0.00017530458,0.00061448116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012144836,0.0002417597,0.00013728246,0.0008283274,0.017526576,0.0003691557,0.00016863785,0.00027042266,0.00032669588],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003250465,0.00007928542,0.024919234,0.000016229751,0.00011893605,0.00008838403,0.00020239702,0.00023262257,0.000026182754,0.95511824,0.006550244,0.012615746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006740062,0.000017725119,0.005172992,0.0008570438,0.000058300262,0.000055551856,0.0029099407,0.00004089414,0.000018147895,0.030363116,0.9593843,0.00044794756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8276157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99149007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95283407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031576492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01968021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99857277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2583353677","doi":"10.1017/9781316672228.005","title":"The “Uncomfortable Embrace”: The Supreme Court and the Media in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Prime minister; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.018127956441835676,"score_gpt":0.1917669530164946,"score_spread":0.17363899657465892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2583353677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022203347,0.0014740612,0.000004261263,0.003058924,0.00043403776,0.0003937076,0.000108023356,0.000013277384,0.99429166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.072210886,0.002681851,7.518622e-7,0.00023099489,0.0002557759,0.0000023498726,0.0000016574381,0.000007336168,0.9246084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881285,0.00012563041,0.00012878145,0.00019823555,0.00044546273,0.0002890232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826854,0.0012289959,0.000120385994,0.00021092301,0.0000990557,0.00007212058],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049453386,0.00016001346,0.0002182574,0.000019326986,0.0023499895,0.000055284607,0.000616364,0.00008960979,0.000004445505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007251461,0.00008005777,0.00006816739,0.000010644927,0.003088691,0.000049136266,0.00030732222,0.00029048216,0.000002259659],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056201,6.8105254e-7,0.000041509455,0.0000018128344,0.00005843746,0.00002143541,0.00043863163,3.4730823e-7,1.2092579e-7,0.9767657,0.021645943,0.0009691702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003708106,0.00000231089,0.0001746079,0.000052169587,0.000061228144,0.0000010710198,0.0021504478,0.000002505348,8.748709e-7,0.001482303,0.9955724,0.00012928231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8987423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.965167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9752834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004833976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001717812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2584855646","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjx017","title":"The Crown and Canadian Federalism, by D. Michael Jackson","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Constitution; Sovereignty; Politics; Law; Dual federalism; Political science; New Federalism; Sociology","score_opus":0.022385696715418568,"score_gpt":0.28680059655578516,"score_spread":0.2644148998403666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2584855646","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30163398,0.0084762545,0.000017572009,0.5779304,0.0019087433,0.0001831833,0.00001984642,0.000010574538,0.10981946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912012,0.003628178,0.000011347982,0.0019801718,0.0007562682,0.0000019975178,3.9808336e-7,0.0000049767764,0.0024154566],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986845,0.0001829631,0.00023626082,0.00007544702,0.00043675455,0.0003840662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866056,0.00022653988,0.00035501833,0.00015752886,0.0003337506,0.00026658096],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019814647,0.00009890934,0.00015293091,0.00003446663,0.017914847,0.0019714623,0.00080350315,0.000057451354,0.000023813924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00081599684,0.0000528374,0.00007144577,0.000048625458,0.0013706782,0.0005364883,0.00008197091,0.00025212666,0.000006113121],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006900678,0.000030009947,0.009894422,0.0000028135503,0.00025758246,0.000026520525,0.012692982,0.0000015661718,0.000091098744,0.28569728,0.6577663,0.033470426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021603444,0.00002192078,0.02684373,0.000017103614,0.000029126983,0.00003076259,0.0042645223,0.0000020535383,0.000014445274,0.022970958,0.94549125,0.00009810622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5836342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7302019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6895672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011683849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005823868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99906456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2585306030","doi":"10.1111/rego.12145","title":"Ideological influences on governance and regulation: The comparative case of supreme courts","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Planning and Budgeting Committee of the Council for Higher Education of Israel; Israeli Centers for Research Excellence; Israel Science Foundation","keywords":"Ideology; Supreme court; Deference; Corporate governance; Politics; Preference; Law; Political science; Ideal (ethics); Legitimacy; Separation of powers; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.06546170716106989,"score_gpt":0.3415143140665916,"score_spread":0.2760526069055217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2585306030","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94535863,0.0007800224,0.00007311221,0.008175868,0.00019628927,0.00021572613,0.000027855122,0.000017204211,0.045155272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986495,0.00025444283,0.000058175236,0.00010161238,0.00020743611,0.000009553601,6.5842374e-7,0.0000018669139,0.0007167679],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901056,0.00008569177,0.0001862193,0.00018245983,0.00039893333,0.00013616211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987319,0.00023147496,0.00063742197,0.00020787594,0.00015462996,0.000036666086],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003223526,0.000089348345,0.00016734781,0.0000052381733,0.0020757872,0.00007058493,0.00020428281,0.00005500315,0.000070063725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042746565,0.00006267708,0.000039036517,0.000058457495,0.0021005676,0.00031576664,0.000064027634,0.00007194377,0.000008655989],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003711997,0.000017350523,0.023848616,0.000002325844,0.000014638044,0.0000073936076,0.0014318869,0.00020234453,0.000042903128,0.97073525,0.0006790637,0.002981123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016616569,0.00003054687,0.94223446,0.000055765053,0.000010894562,0.000010107275,0.00029310593,0.00014509981,0.00011055935,0.0314497,0.025406629,0.00008699911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077284263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008909405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9392855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052115684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007830784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99922335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586630346","doi":"","title":"Diversity, Transparency & Inclusion in Canada’s Judiciary","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Diversity (politics); Inclusion (mineral); Political science; Law; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.01289189969847177,"score_gpt":0.23832819087905868,"score_spread":0.22543629118058692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586630346","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9230827,0.004238494,0.0006555098,0.031637404,0.00047904902,0.00009710334,0.0000041949033,0.00001645382,0.039789103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98684293,0.012560779,0.0000016427656,0.00019472674,0.00022308467,9.4326487e-7,1.5272438e-7,0.0000023774462,0.00017335718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782926,0.00009851981,0.00014567393,0.000102720376,0.0005436466,0.0012801758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997263,0.000061973726,0.00005171341,0.00003572072,0.000052666433,0.00007164266],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011399025,0.00006613801,0.000106675514,0.00005278641,0.0037950953,0.000005920204,0.0003099493,0.00003167271,0.00006536483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007217,0.000047190664,0.000039651124,0.00015653585,0.00013331053,0.00015851014,0.00055800774,0.0003643731,0.0000059830018],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026497433,0.000023545923,0.26372898,3.9471226e-7,0.00003220241,0.000017937995,0.0027408346,0.000001925018,0.000030112666,0.6861934,0.00015175264,0.04705241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003360387,0.000027131202,0.046796754,0.00003328582,0.000009294313,0.000007088297,0.0045615113,2.2762063e-7,0.0000046799255,0.9433292,0.0047943145,0.00010046103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98826176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25713578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056483303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020561544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586848772","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1293","title":"Book Notes: The Last Word. Media Coverage of the Supreme Court of Canada, by Florian Sauvageau, David Schneiderman and David Taras","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.00955608686036542,"score_gpt":0.22057672398506406,"score_spread":0.21102063712469865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586848772","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07584297,0.026604908,0.00018741642,0.049724173,0.0023282368,0.0005167904,0.00039958785,0.000024987332,0.84437096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976121,0.0006518206,0.000017525012,0.0008714612,0.00054448016,0.0000024070553,0.0000024766691,0.00000585394,0.0002918275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827623,0.00017040067,0.00033361386,0.00011823821,0.0008059429,0.00029555138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990551,0.0003134629,0.00025151012,0.0001179237,0.00016959067,0.00009244632],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053325424,0.000119609096,0.00021408105,0.000014960676,0.0018792748,0.000058344904,0.0003747449,0.00005783774,0.00014136832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014432133,0.00007337014,0.00007676012,0.00013562277,0.001248285,0.00016401902,0.00008074625,0.00026353958,0.0000010863743],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004105779,0.00009471411,0.0241718,0.000011907604,0.0001354311,0.000019722522,0.0024500557,0.00013396767,0.0005869903,0.850334,0.12108852,0.0009318368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009309163,0.000045090528,0.09939741,0.00022476802,0.00014913366,0.000045504377,0.0024478515,0.000011412289,0.0011168938,0.1132757,0.78200895,0.00034635776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9126026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9934597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9217692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010353373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065724517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99942017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588656217","doi":"","title":"A Defence of Constitutionalized Interpretation","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.037838196236773335,"score_gpt":0.3577843659545118,"score_spread":0.3199461697177385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588656217","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08422185,0.025534827,0.038168937,0.08611939,0.0032016162,0.00028134484,0.000048725273,0.000057485937,0.7623658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773632,0.0015032778,0.0003436074,0.00015001616,0.00018565502,0.0000076043525,4.937937e-7,0.0000022422087,0.020443888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911284,0.0001139104,0.000173369,0.00013959712,0.0002746316,0.00018562167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992673,0.0002974718,0.00011640105,0.00006684667,0.00019263469,0.00005937527],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023796145,0.000081877566,0.00015663142,0.000028160623,0.00020499075,0.0000065840263,0.000113066584,0.000066772256,0.0010530789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000411628,0.00006070392,0.00008090598,0.00023431778,0.0038640772,0.00015587917,0.00004175795,0.00003625363,0.0003542781],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003645204,0.00004028162,0.0014853526,0.000008827507,0.000041364416,0.0000020056987,0.00506439,0.0000030865167,0.00095425633,0.96911323,0.00214837,0.021102373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096379226,0.00011708125,0.0046445173,0.001451199,0.0001345665,0.000007702365,0.0061951587,0.000027289703,0.001672716,0.21366626,0.7707596,0.00036015632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005636243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00081996113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8931414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011183193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003617123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589723758","doi":"","title":"Nom De Plume: Who Writes the Supreme Court's \"By the Court\" Judgments?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Humanities; Political science; Redaction; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.021664389761494502,"score_gpt":0.27380010781380726,"score_spread":0.2521357180523128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2589723758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13096732,0.0058271363,0.0021222644,0.4224625,0.0019496682,0.00048290752,0.00014019775,0.00012329636,0.43592474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99096936,0.0018299256,0.000028838776,0.003435218,0.0016912466,0.000010701221,5.8989764e-7,0.000008679013,0.002025449],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820346,0.00027300586,0.00022420264,0.00012971835,0.0006605748,0.0005090274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998981,0.000446077,0.00013619529,0.00012962487,0.00016778016,0.00013933393],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014418861,0.00012124027,0.00014566947,0.000014247295,0.005496936,0.00027394318,0.0006254,0.000063388405,0.0004863302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019144395,0.00005311773,0.000116234354,0.00012727805,0.0018125329,0.00024827587,0.00009212149,0.0002554336,0.00011067685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003502912,0.000077186676,0.012081357,0.0000013489549,0.00018173584,0.000023697949,0.0062782876,0.000004514735,0.0005047848,0.7211231,0.24752891,0.012160056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030339375,0.000026505417,0.0029986335,0.00004578722,0.000041315652,0.000037475096,0.0030581618,0.0000025465026,0.00009014672,0.045736596,0.94753885,0.000120608674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067402422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0146049615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86000204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015558215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022666495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591481740","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/62.3.809","title":"Jacco Bomhoff, Balancing Constitutional Rights: The Origins and Meaning of Postwar Legal Discourse","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Original meaning; Constitutional law; Law; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.022726149013596306,"score_gpt":0.3270274343780725,"score_spread":0.3043012853644762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2591481740","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8828333,0.00044510845,0.0020233192,0.006972601,0.00023566719,0.00009032846,0.000008685614,0.0000065633944,0.10738445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99904585,0.000041637926,0.00013225288,0.00041314628,0.00034670017,0.0000011043087,2.646058e-7,0.0000011065973,0.000017921004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987118,0.00040440104,0.0002584909,0.000067890665,0.0004044614,0.00015293744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847186,0.00065818,0.00047933168,0.00006451448,0.00026645232,0.00005966432],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086110365,0.000085833424,0.00032492273,0.000023904759,0.001182888,0.000042469732,0.0002548968,0.000009337333,0.0000140576685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003212667,0.000042227402,0.000076508455,0.00018324766,0.014179068,0.00018880378,0.000038133894,0.00017605674,0.0000039666343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062410276,0.000019332709,0.0013156283,4.878545e-7,0.000088256216,0.0000015008344,0.00505508,0.0000673431,0.00009570485,0.99276316,0.00029387558,0.00023721368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080310804,0.0007906092,0.012608463,0.00020765378,0.00027529465,0.00013714607,0.051198572,0.00007813355,0.0005574267,0.46195817,0.4710519,0.00033353368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038381466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016203063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.530805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004620929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002041165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98850375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591628856","doi":"","title":"Entrenching Rights in the United States and Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bar News: The Journal of the NSW Bar Association","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Government (linguistics); Bill of rights; Law; Public administration; Law and economics; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.00784473361665153,"score_gpt":0.23456688099131012,"score_spread":0.2267221473746586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2591628856","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9432503,0.00009423289,0.000004618966,0.052117888,0.00073672656,0.0000873693,0.000004570222,0.0000024027268,0.0037018938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982499,0.0002411557,0.0000065336517,0.0009626979,0.00039997342,7.070979e-7,6.288643e-7,0.0000013791586,0.00013702434],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984471,0.0005598481,0.00019926767,0.000039831353,0.0006013112,0.00015263578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998707,0.0007991188,0.00025897834,0.00005854496,0.00014699237,0.000029393888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002151371,0.000057257323,0.00009387658,0.00002745369,0.0011629779,0.00006150447,0.00032921063,0.000042826454,0.00001855566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008466895,0.000025668762,0.00003940406,0.00018949671,0.00010859511,0.0001061621,0.000031455158,0.00037052776,0.0000014329349],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062720435,0.00012334256,0.64364994,0.000004638194,0.00030530978,0.0000108208,0.087145455,0.0006062307,0.0008202433,0.1702467,0.09551231,0.0015123232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000461447,0.0000225891,0.5294812,0.000045054836,0.00013167287,0.000009346602,0.019131472,0.000050126826,0.00007857107,0.08308012,0.3673742,0.00013421325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88982934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97290385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2718619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024419517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033758796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89448035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592428550","doi":"","title":"Canadian Constitutional Culture: A Genealogical Account","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; State (computer science); Constitutional law; Law; Constitutional theory; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.022234060384658933,"score_gpt":0.29672746245141973,"score_spread":0.2744934020667608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592428550","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043785196,0.008618828,0.002088338,0.044780206,0.0019305582,0.00025750813,0.0000282453,0.00005647673,0.89845467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99020666,0.006014621,0.000028998962,0.00040599745,0.0014585417,0.0000044979597,0.0000017839449,0.0000023977288,0.0018765086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974393,0.000054328044,0.00013329333,0.00013624526,0.00037899803,0.001857809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934375,0.000016130918,0.000107339074,0.0001000035,0.00018502232,0.00024775678],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012717013,0.00009366434,0.00011928864,0.0000452791,0.009620837,0.0003023114,0.0005198662,0.00009557009,0.0001406229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039379465,0.00007628647,0.00009473738,0.000050633513,0.0017262702,0.0002939657,0.00003685627,0.00081447844,0.00013986108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005988432,0.000011171585,0.009562571,1.7103713e-7,0.00005669531,0.000011993896,0.00024453623,0.0000017554422,0.0000054488787,0.98598033,0.0007313318,0.0033879904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017157664,0.000028026985,0.004043263,0.000006447154,0.000015838415,0.00008221214,0.0021304416,9.981625e-7,0.0000011499434,0.67358387,0.3198241,0.00011208216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3414969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9180986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94642144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025094827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019960795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9916685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592805955","doi":"","title":"Oxford LibGuides: Constitutions and constitutional law: Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitutional law; Political science","score_opus":0.040490158586077116,"score_gpt":0.2727420876774026,"score_spread":0.23225192909132547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592805955","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002895092,0.0062171374,0.0004211964,0.0037688469,0.0033394282,0.00035642972,0.000736135,0.00014151861,0.98499036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.711106,0.045231238,0.0023851118,0.028365958,0.009732491,0.0003392765,0.0008235662,0.00006133983,0.20195502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977596,0.000098095836,0.00042916642,0.00045037127,0.00071716297,0.00054563367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987163,0.000289715,0.0001518451,0.00016063396,0.00037329618,0.00030821675],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000299407,0.0003258331,0.0004646002,0.00007668995,0.0032514508,0.00010659209,0.00033881638,0.0003317324,0.0016455315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035033232,0.0002999542,0.00009693303,0.00018899559,0.027158095,0.00021085692,0.0001799786,0.000356828,0.000032994256],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003232814,0.000013575655,0.00027203615,0.000009589578,0.00008682861,0.00002271327,0.00014363056,3.9512105e-7,1.2907117e-7,0.6944217,0.30478048,0.0002456732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012489683,0.000010207567,0.00006868967,0.00010566609,0.00008596018,0.000011599954,0.0011308778,3.0055602e-7,0.0000020594625,0.061561972,0.93651736,0.00038042848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.980794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9916261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78303534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004034598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014941698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594288950","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3147","title":"Dialogue: Clarified and Reconsidered","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogic; Meaning (existential); Metaphor; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Variation (astronomy); Sociology; Political science; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06817322310856946,"score_gpt":0.3207118989890782,"score_spread":0.2525386758805087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594288950","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063380892,0.0007256178,0.000044887485,0.010137635,0.0007265934,0.00005251011,0.0000037363282,0.000017631924,0.9819533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969788,0.001024813,0.00025371485,0.0003392695,0.0008829008,0.00000197315,3.42631e-7,0.0000033876715,0.00051476323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992123,0.00008793002,0.00013565586,0.00010910374,0.00022277584,0.00023219672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994287,0.000065426,0.00014541393,0.00010507866,0.000100113335,0.00015528922],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000626263,0.00006971725,0.00013207892,0.000015515456,0.009131856,0.00051972526,0.00021802179,0.000075662785,0.00011752245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035850756,0.000060216415,0.000051183742,0.000016066424,0.0012100737,0.00034466464,0.00007038945,0.00021993945,0.000033588425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009484966,0.000012254573,0.0040575033,7.0334465e-7,0.000027717457,0.00003132814,0.0005686579,2.4402576e-7,0.000023060516,0.987926,0.0009875624,0.0063554584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031167423,0.000019337449,0.0143885305,0.000027625403,0.000021443835,0.000046467143,0.0007522678,0.0000010602777,0.000017384657,0.8842465,0.100052916,0.0001147368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1350044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5079819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99064076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033098328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011001672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9921581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597632956","doi":"","title":"At the Margins of Official Classifications: Status-less Indigenous Groups in Canadian Courts","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Droit et société","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Invisibility; Denial; Identity (music); Political science; Visibility; Order (exchange); Law; Geography; Psychology; Business","score_opus":0.03867653008841583,"score_gpt":0.3274721020581544,"score_spread":0.2887955719697386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2597632956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8426143,0.0010654209,0.000009144129,0.0023254333,0.00039798117,0.0002527701,0.00008532436,0.00001258771,0.15323707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983994,0.0003830096,0.000007918024,0.00045311032,0.00024075276,0.00003120182,0.00001603342,0.000004708682,0.00046390452],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877787,0.00012730135,0.0001698319,0.00009566302,0.00028338665,0.0005459301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941444,0.00018775495,0.00007694305,0.000091909205,0.00006748651,0.00016145402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074582023,0.000068413865,0.00012989035,0.000055053228,0.00091116433,0.00001589073,0.00016069176,0.00007843362,0.00018152995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015847228,0.000059321897,0.00005086239,0.000236642,0.00063447177,0.00011636677,0.00003652324,0.000114754104,0.000047183374],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056663325,0.00006569628,0.13845381,0.0000020305954,0.000019589217,9.070041e-7,0.056496166,0.000006720614,0.000011876029,0.80133003,0.0004922206,0.0031152805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016393654,0.000009230207,0.75411564,0.000011797413,0.000017875162,5.010622e-7,0.06564474,0.000002272541,0.000011452385,0.015398518,0.16448611,0.00013790894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8378746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9780504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7859315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008173895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011576838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70080316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2598777775","doi":"","title":"Review of G.C.N. Webber, the Negotiable Constitution: On the Limitation of Rights (Cambridge University Press, 2009)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.015671350958945975,"score_gpt":0.2488015643107564,"score_spread":0.23313021335181042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2598777775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058046356,0.094176196,0.0005971812,0.044500824,0.001129133,0.00086324656,0.000031010164,0.000031784097,0.80062425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9044306,0.09421096,0.0000076288807,0.00020170641,0.00020252327,8.701427e-7,8.0246934e-7,0.0000011870101,0.00094371464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988399,0.00019357486,0.00016042829,0.000070955306,0.00030373043,0.00043139895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991786,0.00022431265,0.00021254648,0.00009429855,0.0002635131,0.000026750444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019013108,0.000060984887,0.00012100566,0.00001908133,0.0011729918,0.000009989737,0.00029854808,0.000035998117,0.000026349895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026607528,0.00003403755,0.00009453652,0.00020041571,0.0010676383,0.0001110533,0.00002170798,0.00068191934,0.000007952064],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011662698,0.00002899225,0.000099895515,0.000008877587,0.000052231284,2.925632e-7,0.000074459436,0.0000021697178,0.000035805675,0.992549,0.0067476644,0.00038895558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020474185,0.000091784925,0.00044164536,0.000461905,0.00010985893,0.000016876387,0.002156446,0.0000027401936,0.00011843922,0.11554042,0.88076663,0.00008852168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041474267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005260642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87700856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011823592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019066725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9021823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2601669387","doi":"","title":"A Skeptical Optimist’s Perspective on Canada Getting to Proportional Representation as an Electoral Reform","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Perspective (graphical); Proportional representation; Representation (politics); Political science; Economics; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Computer science; Democracy; Politics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03209003241784091,"score_gpt":0.3544658520037639,"score_spread":0.322375819585923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2601669387","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3179703,0.0000068515906,0.00023545284,0.06605093,0.0001899453,0.00021228098,0.000006219142,0.000055495846,0.6152725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952317,0.0000025748964,0.00028472516,0.0011999112,0.0004199214,0.000021120071,0.0000012523641,0.0000026386615,0.0028361492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988943,0.00004082936,0.000105939806,0.00021419603,0.00052517606,0.00021960361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994514,0.00005155743,0.00002683105,0.000057554742,0.0002615451,0.00015110255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000157686,0.000060485294,0.00007292728,0.000023541701,0.0006087881,0.000023762845,0.00008603977,0.000026291718,0.0004596661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004937967,0.000038353497,0.000023145616,0.00013725879,0.00017277995,0.00014118235,0.000021638049,0.000038914768,0.0000550661],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004082754,0.00002746229,0.0021632495,1.8026074e-7,0.000010793812,0.0000061644705,0.00063320604,0.0000029860303,0.00012717447,0.99356645,0.0015233142,0.0018982068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014705606,0.001454622,0.26049864,0.0001574753,0.000059084363,0.000015179253,0.1520745,0.000034904097,0.004768642,0.45510668,0.12277129,0.0015884393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96324265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.965356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6772614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018714716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013113056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50330216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2601949199","doi":"","title":"Popular constitutional amendment: Referendums and constitutional change in Canada and the United Kingdom","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queen's law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional amendment; Political science; Kingdom; Amendment; Constitutional law; Law; Constitution","score_opus":0.09018708587682121,"score_gpt":0.30018320084071143,"score_spread":0.2099961149638902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2601949199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8052357,0.005104397,0.0008998807,0.07895239,0.0033356422,0.0009824514,0.00015965292,0.000052828276,0.10527707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972238,0.0004162436,0.00006153348,0.0017865013,0.00046898445,0.000014267957,0.0000066932425,0.0000018255558,0.000020185424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852955,0.00025691552,0.00023568684,0.0001305412,0.0005686053,0.0002787193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932164,0.00011588824,0.000099255376,0.000044185967,0.00017918978,0.00023981952],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088045973,0.00010959922,0.00018717203,0.00006133637,0.0014932363,0.00010017257,0.000114615716,0.000046623853,0.00004017366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018839368,0.000076847566,0.000024318508,0.00019626254,0.010576391,0.00021847388,0.00006282703,0.0002893812,0.000002272032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052939733,0.000010518158,0.025754847,0.0000011469983,0.000026153739,0.00005170695,0.0007345232,0.000017041883,3.3133472e-7,0.97271967,0.0004247082,0.0002063917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0052914396,0.00004158702,0.0131362295,0.00017673372,0.00007143509,0.00030081964,0.0090660285,0.000054458193,0.0000031952509,0.26105186,0.71040183,0.00040440288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9855833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9605763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71166784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054057536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018993973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603873046","doi":"","title":"What the U.S. Can teach Canada About Supreme Court Appointments","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.016975498232780026,"score_gpt":0.25660928416078543,"score_spread":0.2396337859280054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2603873046","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26445025,0.006234223,0.000045507215,0.2475822,0.007837566,0.0009785161,0.00015393244,0.00019819487,0.47251964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868905,0.00081366836,0.000012174413,0.003940935,0.00075315963,0.000041082953,0.0000024483684,0.000006494589,0.0075395396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983627,0.00013658225,0.00017163913,0.0002258683,0.00066657,0.00043659267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999281,0.00015524942,0.00006158851,0.0001873677,0.0001195759,0.00019521502],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004184547,0.00012347793,0.0001435376,0.000010882414,0.0017640352,0.00015671083,0.00039848997,0.000053373522,0.00054992386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018245087,0.00006975571,0.000055955126,0.00012704173,0.0007760553,0.00032700182,0.000082848645,0.000117143296,0.00016102148],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011505908,0.00002952837,0.014728852,0.0000021172593,0.00007890789,0.000013035016,0.0009887555,0.0000011459167,0.000066594555,0.8964264,0.081170976,0.006482196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020626638,0.000011102607,0.009375097,0.00006437577,0.000015598052,8.9679213e-7,0.0028496308,1.9227002e-7,0.0000679058,0.016755098,0.9705059,0.000147971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9497437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9939314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8893349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046748528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001220265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99953556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604134551","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0002","title":"Which Governments Come Out Ahead?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Cooperative federalism; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law and economics; Public administration; Business; Political economy; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04691081642210825,"score_gpt":0.3473193465272077,"score_spread":0.30040853010509944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604134551","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.073106,0.00020619393,0.000017394137,0.03478592,0.00070759084,0.00014198566,0.000017417837,0.00006049952,0.890957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921465,0.00033256004,0.000031778818,0.00037249958,0.0007222385,0.000014781722,7.876197e-7,0.0000056458507,0.0063732145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998768,0.000060912043,0.000091425165,0.00026872248,0.0005359685,0.00027497005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939084,0.000054161243,0.00009405585,0.00021920704,0.00014942375,0.000092303184],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022155415,0.00010810669,0.00014962435,0.000020090238,0.0058362396,0.0003730554,0.0003605104,0.000058215337,0.00018883808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060429715,0.000098881836,0.00006629459,0.000034425426,0.0006837784,0.00024534564,0.00009105999,0.00012336847,0.00037343375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024223076,0.000095825,0.007873787,8.574105e-7,0.000049728445,0.0000041960784,0.028887145,7.39496e-7,0.00002451341,0.9597758,0.0027703515,0.00049285474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010658349,0.00013365671,0.41396338,0.00007896619,0.000036025725,0.0000010246865,0.13659084,0.000006066966,0.000076008124,0.1181843,0.32924283,0.0006210662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012602209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018469876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9190405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032052136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008976383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604408756","doi":"","title":"Quasi-Constitutional Statutes: A Theory","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.027466332883952876,"score_gpt":0.28982838567485586,"score_spread":0.26236205279090297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604408756","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00053237245,0.00092181447,0.020190483,0.0071271434,0.0008784511,0.000073356685,0.000024070001,0.000056381785,0.97019595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959596,0.0006519564,0.00037770878,0.0006286335,0.001248849,0.0000061801966,6.038183e-7,0.0000042037486,0.0011222675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838936,0.00025281194,0.00023076119,0.00015290447,0.00056720787,0.0004069314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990448,0.00032539977,0.00010698749,0.0000757711,0.00022524738,0.00022179475],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011701788,0.00011097706,0.00015086605,0.000040986437,0.002962472,0.00010372635,0.0002507177,0.00007162529,0.0015128354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032907,0.000070203576,0.00012676591,0.000103847015,0.003620543,0.00044164943,0.000044847005,0.00015777897,0.00035770575],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000332655,0.000088400295,0.0007459016,6.8256026e-7,0.000055470555,0.000032317923,0.00039281452,8.857595e-7,0.00005960181,0.9888127,0.0010867228,0.008691227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030555413,0.000036937618,0.00021654149,0.000058719874,0.00001621441,0.00004289529,0.0007956804,1.3909596e-7,0.000023620794,0.7842924,0.21409608,0.00011520143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009181667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049371023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99542725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018658055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054362306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605280893","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avw016","title":"Po Jen Yap, Constitutional Dialogue in Common Law Asia (Oxford University Press, 2015)†","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Dialogic; Commonwealth; Law; Judicial review; Constitutional review; Constitutional law; Political science; High Court; Constitutional theory; Common law; Constitutional court; Sociology; Constitution; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.04189211310654754,"score_gpt":0.31598301007100676,"score_spread":0.2740908969644592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605280893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5395466,0.0006399473,0.0014179192,0.01842006,0.0003315728,0.00020654302,0.000060582588,0.000019105537,0.43935764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99890816,0.00036774023,0.00006492435,0.0003274981,0.00021418503,7.074169e-7,4.9291333e-7,0.000001515155,0.00011478773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985618,0.0005635627,0.00023069102,0.00008732435,0.00034796604,0.00020866231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875504,0.00052460964,0.00035069414,0.00007320935,0.00020819827,0.000088255314],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051737716,0.00009423891,0.00036543727,0.00003141937,0.00062145514,0.000022048116,0.00038464714,0.000018425844,0.000029406325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010560137,0.00005509487,0.00009082015,0.00022723358,0.013437009,0.0002936163,0.000061963365,0.00015249847,0.000009095252],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023071097,0.000051269166,0.0034361412,2.9716452e-7,0.00006263209,0.00001722777,0.0011567435,0.000029439074,0.00003907279,0.9931182,0.0012865808,0.00057167094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079589244,0.0002742556,0.0153354015,0.00010164189,0.00004752202,0.000019500254,0.008230319,0.0000013334998,0.00018387896,0.19148336,0.78333145,0.00019544199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005042378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009752136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80163485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017481488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026655392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98924786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605427376","doi":"","title":"The Court and Administrative Law: Models of Rights Protection","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Deference; Charter; Ultra vires; Political science; Administrative law; Law; Judicial review; Judicial deference; Public law; Common law; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Economics; Doctrine","score_opus":0.040943929514015126,"score_gpt":0.31789702874018777,"score_spread":0.2769530992261726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605427376","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34583843,0.011259102,0.0061497204,0.03576527,0.0008004022,0.0006890052,0.0000061307996,0.00003226966,0.59945965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99587184,0.0034658639,0.000006427313,0.000009785801,0.00022193309,0.0000045934753,4.6008722e-8,0.0000012894907,0.00041824376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990734,0.000059502872,0.00009779703,0.00006034492,0.00020484155,0.00050412456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960303,0.000032570104,0.00016115037,0.000056634894,0.000115562034,0.000031030504],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011323254,0.00004430973,0.000070480935,0.000008254308,0.0069352617,0.00010267098,0.00016993932,0.0000297409,0.000001753469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006376608,0.000027507353,0.000032740525,0.000018240653,0.001099686,0.00023186087,0.000021295786,0.00035162567,0.0000012303625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022377362,0.0000080921145,0.00006523103,2.4481164e-7,0.000043499585,3.3230808e-7,0.00053238036,0.0000012383391,0.000010843805,0.99597824,0.000010636111,0.0033268973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000107125554,0.00008377979,0.0003220174,0.000008483081,0.000011243289,0.000010881801,0.0029375998,0.000013343111,0.00003040246,0.98948115,0.0069570937,0.00003686697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014441488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1604949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65003335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013775215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010282269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9943576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605783949","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0029","title":"Interpreting the<i>Charter</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Human rights; Law; Covenant; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; Convention; International human rights law; Politics; Interpretation (philosophy); Fundamental rights; Linguistic rights; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Right to property; Sociology; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.03706271426520755,"score_gpt":0.24729189542655725,"score_spread":0.2102291811613497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605783949","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000009793993,0.00014153293,0.00007637814,0.0003719778,0.00042508205,0.00021526619,0.000043993434,0.00006988627,0.9986461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015709255,0.0005940082,0.000011114388,0.00013357154,0.0003114326,5.823896e-7,0.000002218826,0.000008996603,0.9832288],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999127,0.00003710439,0.0000895674,0.0002258455,0.00029635392,0.00022415067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992664,0.00009312235,0.00019798617,0.00025911868,0.00010993421,0.00007344749],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018266412,0.00016470747,0.00019772693,0.000033459415,0.0030322017,0.000097881835,0.00078552245,0.00018797973,0.00005042113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023916777,0.00014763414,0.00017188732,0.0000019674353,0.0016652708,0.000082717466,0.0002788132,0.00029659685,0.0000051454094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001788715,0.0000018433889,0.0000047822136,0.0000031150926,0.00007668743,0.000030683914,0.0017067569,1.610584e-7,5.0662624e-7,0.9859177,0.0033665223,0.0088733835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007853756,0.000009768533,0.000003800707,0.00012252943,0.00008076843,7.328614e-7,0.0004080672,9.59832e-7,0.0000021453284,0.013223412,0.98589367,0.00017560736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026677495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022473491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98252714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000121444624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018087476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99826574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606376738","doi":"10.1017/s0008423916001207","title":"Back to the Future: Historical Political Science and the Promise of Canadian Political Development","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Constitution; Political science; Federalism; Foundation (evidence); American political science; Environmental ethics; Social science; Sociology; Political economy; Law","score_opus":0.03727073667867665,"score_gpt":0.290084384350863,"score_spread":0.25281364767218634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606376738","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18183619,0.00028803214,0.00003246831,0.6442747,0.0020632616,0.0003654584,0.000019161651,0.0000030816498,0.17111763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952678,0.0000050438066,0.00027823978,0.0032918802,0.0009833934,0.0000036248118,4.6746724e-8,0.0000033049744,0.00016664008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99508566,0.0000995418,0.00040146298,0.00023809918,0.0013116472,0.0028636213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98928756,0.00020685083,0.00011627337,0.00027568697,0.0013220564,0.008791598],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006369176,0.00012301056,0.00026155583,0.0004751755,0.008021693,0.00049629575,0.0022076569,0.00005990221,0.00007385668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011450138,0.00007104678,0.00006512626,0.00089598715,0.027054174,0.0003835521,0.00014069355,0.0002795207,0.000027820131],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006813613,0.000006047954,0.004460913,0.0000016629771,0.0000050360495,0.000012786507,0.0011857823,1.4291513e-7,0.0000075950848,0.9927646,0.0009338941,0.00061472494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043652495,0.000079631085,0.57372797,0.00006886158,0.00003461777,0.00008661901,0.0070768585,0.0000074887876,0.00016982782,0.05737042,0.36069024,0.00025097813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9251879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9372948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93539417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058144885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059958514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607452614","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v10n3p13","title":"Constitution-Building Bodies and the Sequencing of Public Participation A Comparison of Seven Empirical Cases","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Vetenskapsrådet","keywords":"Constitution; Compromise; Politics; Authoritarianism; Democracy; Negotiation; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Promulgation; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.1865597003000454,"score_gpt":0.43291092015940735,"score_spread":0.24635121985936195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607452614","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9765823,0.001333087,0.00012731386,0.005255505,0.000112542955,0.00004107631,0.000006168451,0.0000013230028,0.016540702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994891,0.00019809081,0.000111270354,0.00006783222,0.00012432804,5.040584e-7,7.069687e-8,6.759444e-7,0.000008079733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934566,0.00007874059,0.00025751189,0.00003345389,0.0001837876,0.00010082871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893,0.00034326158,0.0003842885,0.000039936935,0.00024791577,0.000054600638],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067042676,0.000036027835,0.00019641347,0.000020781794,0.0010393126,0.0000613397,0.00007428573,0.00002468233,0.0000028264687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010902241,0.000022902379,0.000038333565,0.000013874411,0.0037937043,0.0001536151,0.00003829385,0.000059279264,5.6107627e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000080185355,0.0000135807295,0.054646473,0.000006702169,0.00003411957,0.0000016882508,0.004615227,0.0000036113167,0.000025647747,0.94032097,0.000030072808,0.00029391365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028755097,0.00039559,0.14674354,0.00057551725,0.0005854962,0.00008917661,0.051354453,0.0004439085,0.0014722913,0.732212,0.06295272,0.0002998181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008002434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003234494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20810896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025137286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002043883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607701913","doi":"","title":"Un regard québécois sur le droit constitutionnel","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.027868515235029086,"score_gpt":0.23910967993242502,"score_spread":0.21124116469739593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607701913","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030833162,0.012245203,0.0066271434,0.18296921,0.0035001778,0.00020203026,0.00006597317,0.00014577695,0.76341134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9270788,0.0031003398,0.00017564236,0.0009881805,0.00087484263,0.0000128653355,9.867224e-7,0.0000052108053,0.06776317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847215,0.00010800644,0.00026553238,0.00031004427,0.00037245703,0.00047181663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912196,0.0002516265,0.00007897105,0.00013298857,0.00024151865,0.00017295041],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000329474,0.00016207538,0.00023152695,0.000035426674,0.0011989438,0.000034121946,0.00022192058,0.00014633565,0.0024527928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032218586,0.000118881944,0.0001516936,0.00033047883,0.00505271,0.00042782747,0.000089298876,0.00007464484,0.0020881298],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011587619,0.000112855625,0.0025358964,0.0000032702649,0.00007727365,0.000013289067,0.0005960841,7.727675e-7,0.000050588977,0.9281399,0.01057499,0.057883486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046831538,0.000026255373,0.0034021803,0.000107575645,0.000035062894,0.000006299048,0.0015737264,0.0000014662292,0.00018361547,0.24100387,0.75296205,0.00022959769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46512777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25846684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8962456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026745957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015681268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607826394","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0044","title":"The Role of Theory in Canadian Constitutional Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Federalism; Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Separation of powers; Context (archaeology); Constitutional law; Limited government; Constitutionalism; Sociology; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.020439219588101402,"score_gpt":0.22379526418867857,"score_spread":0.20335604460057716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607826394","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000110000465,0.00053021114,0.000002678599,0.0000921813,0.00015683903,0.00017216358,0.00014118887,0.0000100815805,0.99888366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22984032,0.00068622135,0.0000051458373,0.000033371198,0.00009945609,6.055697e-7,0.0000046587797,0.0000034366694,0.7693268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992646,0.000044020453,0.00009202263,0.00013729784,0.00022198397,0.00024005734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993636,0.0001345131,0.00012037924,0.00015348928,0.00011415182,0.00011385852],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030881094,0.000103958,0.00015839032,0.000053506075,0.0023165804,0.000030600087,0.000496085,0.00017320446,0.000024705458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003247415,0.00009656305,0.00008732483,0.0000030457134,0.0075640804,0.000055827208,0.00010838797,0.0001832537,0.0000010482847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002558369,0.0000018714755,0.00005946219,0.0000014468084,0.00004912629,0.0000196686,0.00038276013,7.501102e-7,2.5604191e-7,0.9963094,0.000079425976,0.003070269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006405678,0.0000037978796,0.000020486443,0.000041912303,0.000021566173,2.7632817e-7,0.00030969235,2.6508755e-7,0.0000017567901,0.2653086,0.7341491,0.000078500794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5982607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.912949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7340697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002736147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015330756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99898225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610315011","doi":"","title":"Administrative Law Cases at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Citizenship; Tribunal; Immigration law; Appeal; Nationality; Immigration; Sociology; Humanities; Politics; Art","score_opus":0.027400335092800886,"score_gpt":0.29274553003371756,"score_spread":0.2653451949409167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610315011","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66858137,0.007779222,0.00006082726,0.030376486,0.0004008344,0.00014841292,0.000017878276,0.000009975439,0.292625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927727,0.0030150854,0.0000014877373,0.0002405921,0.00029447555,0.0000020603832,6.4423324e-7,0.0000023054063,0.0036706477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832374,0.00009744297,0.00014277991,0.00006958871,0.00041614834,0.0009503124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951404,0.00015765292,0.00009482446,0.000046281635,0.00013212678,0.000055053497],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008026453,0.00006257241,0.00009995801,0.000009048096,0.0018003056,0.0000155588,0.00017654645,0.000023329154,0.00013528588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001205507,0.000041863223,0.00005012318,0.000120680364,0.00057915103,0.00006408341,0.000023821409,0.000349075,0.000003511316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033373253,0.000014428852,0.0033460432,2.7961835e-7,0.00007648186,0.000016619973,0.00044438743,0.000005055493,0.000012952065,0.9941542,0.0013713093,0.0005248694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002955266,0.0002199471,0.002112791,0.000017632934,0.00005452899,0.0005681613,0.064511016,0.0000010973299,0.00011744069,0.48717502,0.44474927,0.00017757821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8434147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50697917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012484192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0116866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610361054","doi":"","title":"State Action Doctrine and the Logic of Constitutional Containment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Political science; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Constitutional law; Constitutional review; Constitutional economics; Law and economics; Sociology; Constitution","score_opus":0.06319184475315223,"score_gpt":0.35058092755523285,"score_spread":0.28738908280208064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610361054","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08793223,0.0003793371,0.0014796903,0.026206225,0.00032805905,0.0002537203,0.000008033626,0.000016809505,0.8833959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998394,0.0006633167,0.000031013093,0.00015902786,0.000061972794,0.0000056811773,2.5318954e-7,2.7449477e-7,0.0006844602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996153,0.000032628577,0.00007180075,0.00005485896,0.00015557057,0.00006983151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971443,0.00008253322,0.00007011047,0.000053693173,0.00005939583,0.000019838539],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036851937,0.000029365465,0.000072357325,0.000006910945,0.0015878062,0.000035150308,0.0000820139,0.000012071974,0.000077214034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018139406,0.000016643833,0.00002088157,0.0000134295715,0.007170884,0.000084108666,0.000047236903,0.000026692689,0.000005441389],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036393452,0.0000075508037,0.005459255,6.7234424e-7,0.000015846517,4.1975193e-7,0.000280709,0.0000013194372,0.00001387296,0.99174386,0.00009727151,0.0023428444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016103666,0.000026711412,0.08915062,0.000013079036,0.000026931137,0.0000016545576,0.0032162943,0.000011531802,0.0001763358,0.80552113,0.10015246,0.00009287455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011415963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042315144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9104618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018961702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008388547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610473374","doi":"","title":"Dimensions of Indian Judicial Activism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cross-cultural communication","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Parliament; Political science; Supreme court; Judicial activism; Judicial independence; Constitution of India; Duty; Judicial review; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.05979466172094192,"score_gpt":0.396167824456758,"score_spread":0.3363731627358161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610473374","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8409716,0.00031823263,0.0000021487022,0.0038265046,0.0001617396,0.000112631635,0.000007228766,0.000034451947,0.15456547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99862933,0.00079598976,0.00008554529,0.000053812986,0.00011206201,0.000010878705,0.000009698464,0.000002490128,0.00030019568],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993357,0.000074106996,0.0001468772,0.00009142433,0.000209383,0.00014251587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988342,0.00007477407,0.00022681922,0.00043027778,0.0003866082,0.000047298294],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029071816,0.000062281455,0.00011723821,0.00001738372,0.0063827755,0.00023501056,0.0006668442,0.00006843207,0.000030970717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079752546,0.00004625672,0.000061011255,0.000057536185,0.0035950067,0.00071786006,0.00018686036,0.00011623554,0.000032082113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004713846,0.0001332808,0.081427656,0.0000074412605,0.00007542159,0.0000015820104,0.023572545,0.000009565967,0.0028093236,0.85590553,0.0016349262,0.034375556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046319398,0.000032617674,0.7128725,0.000109800385,0.0000288973,0.0000011575486,0.005646019,0.000004579043,0.0019009145,0.08933955,0.18933704,0.00026374465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02356194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070108473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76656604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055638844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000091041315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99911666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611970165","doi":"","title":"The All-Affected Principle: Does it Create a Right to Vote?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Space (punctuation); Politics; Political science; Association (psychology); Space Science; Media studies; Sociology; Mathematics education; Law; Psychology; Computer science; Epistemology; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0221721618270777,"score_gpt":0.29686691487386985,"score_spread":0.27469475304679214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611970165","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22577146,0.00018728411,0.00007991324,0.053765908,0.00033673923,0.00024323777,0.000009590009,0.000043279677,0.7195626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97949433,0.00046511504,0.0001279455,0.00006456561,0.000095145995,3.9087857e-7,4.5843194e-7,0.0000018921992,0.019750135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928504,0.000060521386,0.000040629366,0.00013911887,0.000257364,0.00021732436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993826,0.00006957237,0.00009920476,0.00022342236,0.000120677425,0.000104531406],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002611451,0.000069044916,0.00012376251,0.000007580261,0.0046915105,0.000055728684,0.00061601336,0.000046668843,0.000823022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018143305,0.00005009127,0.00007045323,0.000023290802,0.00086232537,0.0002945806,0.00024402511,0.0000437505,0.000032225533],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034392718,0.00016648653,0.013628595,0.000014015695,0.00059673795,0.00006819564,0.13321857,0.0000065411514,0.0008488958,0.778231,0.017825913,0.055051092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019876845,0.000035768026,0.48901144,0.000021820251,0.000040708248,1.6061597e-7,0.01877575,0.0000048885963,0.000023903427,0.0006481472,0.49112636,0.00011229276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.70218796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9507085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7775829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017938348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001059217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99660426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612211185","doi":"10.1108/s1059-433720170000072003","title":"The Nursery Years of ‘Judicial Activism’: From A Historian’s Shorthand to Media Catchphrase 1947–1962","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in law, politics, and society","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Terminology; Politics; Term (time); Media studies; Law; Political activism; Political science; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05985605103574868,"score_gpt":0.3361861451319482,"score_spread":0.2763300940961995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612211185","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0077986573,0.021296913,0.0000024069136,0.0027137066,0.0070862714,0.00054384145,0.0007019331,0.00003717166,0.9598191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8850486,0.043644153,0.000071692724,0.0009436315,0.0063274517,0.000045407127,0.00001641979,0.00003683687,0.0638658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821943,0.000044524648,0.00036354768,0.00036163346,0.0005570365,0.00045381568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981788,0.0009576273,0.00021836339,0.0002656314,0.00023700962,0.00014261482],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004706841,0.0002511245,0.0006593691,0.00002498407,0.0022006312,0.00004586718,0.0003390997,0.00026785053,0.000011328844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005399161,0.00022259937,0.00024989128,0.000016504768,0.012538787,0.00007332021,0.0002988211,0.00029315279,0.000006019955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011899313,0.0000148447625,0.00023305195,0.000011620781,0.00040647932,0.000010389012,0.12437844,1.3467923e-7,5.023691e-7,0.8637119,0.008774842,0.0024458796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019881291,0.000025779986,0.00096666976,0.00023489809,0.00013757045,2.5954117e-7,0.019537672,2.0819846e-7,0.0000016138118,0.30797815,0.67064875,0.00026957455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04050682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11083129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8959533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054131425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064234564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99909836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612301594","doi":"10.4324/9781315400068","title":"Debating Judicial Appointments in an Age of Diversity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Political science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.09202277233623969,"score_gpt":0.33274381584323026,"score_spread":0.24072104350699058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612301594","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028318018,0.00009485189,0.000010815616,0.00008349484,0.00027904377,0.00015811794,0.000014988196,0.000017774486,0.99650913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6088908,0.00021490715,0.00010061742,0.000118955286,0.00085755455,0.000004559438,0.000040448613,0.0000064777314,0.3897657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906504,0.000045181023,0.00015345289,0.00016722664,0.00040180903,0.00016730616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995639,0.00004589036,0.0001649166,0.00009939759,0.00007666701,0.00004927416],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032409374,0.00009432881,0.00026551116,0.00005981633,0.0013452589,0.000022397398,0.00036891032,0.00015110354,0.00015843609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011626054,0.000092497154,0.0000665736,0.000027202112,0.0009303866,0.00013252301,0.0003850053,0.00011909537,0.000022164222],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021206406,0.00008747794,0.033117615,0.000013182089,0.00006179496,0.00006124074,0.008820515,8.8673295e-7,0.0000037381428,0.94177544,0.0050301626,0.011006733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050114427,0.00010547508,0.040254533,0.00034665284,0.00008484027,1.8035875e-7,0.0026155126,0.0000013027424,0.000003734963,0.76438296,0.19120835,0.00049534236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049943727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16952719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6067434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019358823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005228715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612725658","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1038","title":"“Reconciling Rights” the Supreme Court of Canada's Approach To Competing Charter Rights","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.038808129526871606,"score_gpt":0.2747366242445672,"score_spread":0.23592849471769559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612725658","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029946088,0.04164075,0.00014790664,0.009490743,0.0006875272,0.0012763771,0.000033375843,0.00004470698,0.943684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928006,0.0022372557,0.00035705024,0.0037258787,0.00029762366,0.00007413557,0.000006063732,0.000008923363,0.00049246754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974793,0.0004187942,0.0004946879,0.00030131344,0.0008122271,0.00049365725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880314,0.00022012804,0.00015356037,0.0002629694,0.00038853125,0.00017165497],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00189411,0.0001941519,0.0005199089,0.000017174421,0.0018376402,0.00003372838,0.00043908722,0.000050507977,0.00030079644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023530588,0.00012654657,0.00014293089,0.00034075134,0.0005209636,0.00009640209,0.00005153861,0.00016705485,0.00003311222],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023026203,0.000034845754,0.00017274171,0.0001317708,0.00005528803,0.0000020242262,0.00067314506,0.000006612659,0.000006933305,0.9861589,0.012601562,0.00015386588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083287465,0.000010265425,0.0000853244,0.0007746335,0.00006986181,0.0000032222215,0.00029651102,0.0000037743923,0.000048164176,0.0069721155,0.9914608,0.00019206897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.50971484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.757548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.989806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018558162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070125173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613081353","doi":"10.14232/phd.3942","title":"Alapjogi aktivizmus a Supreme Court gazdaságszabályozási tárgyú ügyeiben (1890-1937)","year":2017,"lang":"hu","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University; Washington State Department of Labor and Industries; Ohio State University","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03959112055947703,"score_gpt":0.33054680458376934,"score_spread":0.2909556840242923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613081353","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031978413,0.0033734955,0.000056681212,0.004186235,0.006297605,0.0011395164,0.00017620898,0.00025608265,0.95253575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8386845,0.0040236632,0.000085115484,0.00048625722,0.0029814972,0.00015005449,0.00039134515,0.00005276349,0.15314482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937517,0.00029845804,0.0009763019,0.0013626638,0.002162937,0.0014479237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962928,0.00039049814,0.0009878885,0.00074737467,0.0010910381,0.0004903532],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010586804,0.0009997179,0.0013597582,0.000233644,0.007560813,0.0007842327,0.0017840822,0.001050304,0.007108128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009233792,0.0009229938,0.0007516862,0.00041723307,0.0022386557,0.00071882864,0.00021389704,0.0008351723,0.0043565044],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049167033,0.0009657753,0.013826645,0.0002485111,0.002033153,0.00021389127,0.037629265,0.000013720331,0.00063514034,0.7800776,0.12393725,0.03992741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013295108,0.00033069024,0.074402854,0.001024703,0.0010455834,0.000008716537,0.060593102,0.000039618702,0.0004835481,0.0583007,0.7994961,0.0029448827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08811848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13369542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8067061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041808543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019739019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99932206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613106606","doi":"","title":"L’Obligation De Faire Adopter La Version Française Des Textes Constitutionnels Canadiens (The Obligation to Adopt the French Version of Canadian Constitutional Texts)","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Obligation; Art; Law","score_opus":0.013903925745154588,"score_gpt":0.2483120575845127,"score_spread":0.2344081318393581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613106606","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72967607,0.019198423,0.004490939,0.1292559,0.0030495212,0.00083577324,0.0002684919,0.000026626416,0.11319827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99098355,0.0060956734,0.00007471023,0.00037998345,0.00075671566,0.00001194759,0.000009036721,0.0000069850203,0.0016813895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965346,0.00034876767,0.0003866327,0.00024903848,0.0006310643,0.0018499041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99806607,0.00027686896,0.0003837937,0.00025180602,0.0006522826,0.00036919749],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031301081,0.00023281758,0.00023301394,0.0002521663,0.012523307,0.00025324087,0.0008362651,0.00021003096,0.00020062125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010133404,0.0001728962,0.00019601308,0.0005887946,0.010138528,0.0006687119,0.0000948826,0.0011170192,0.0001379233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026744032,0.000038701324,0.015360162,0.000006768427,0.00017114548,0.000008280091,0.0046230326,0.00064954604,0.000055256965,0.95626175,0.0031207395,0.01967787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080570456,0.00022855955,0.06832186,0.0005761695,0.00035863582,0.00031716115,0.017729713,0.00012156947,0.00010335017,0.4448937,0.4661239,0.0004196837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7654711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9445968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51136804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003058363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019619493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9925553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613621158","doi":"","title":"The Unbearable Lightness of Balancing: Towards a Theoretical Framework for the Doctrinal Complexity in Proportionality Analysis in Constitutional Adjudication","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Adjudication; Writ; Charter; Law; Political science; Doctrine; Law and economics; Constitutional law; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.031726151012262754,"score_gpt":0.3366598236446587,"score_spread":0.3049336726323959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613621158","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23775549,0.00834159,0.59696406,0.14453708,0.0005011525,0.0012354689,0.000049572,0.000029953626,0.010585649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971392,0.002417888,0.00010789108,0.00005108678,0.00020224636,0.000042727337,0.0000011814033,0.0000015800333,0.000036156405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774283,0.00025880846,0.00041055304,0.00014820894,0.00052413705,0.00091547065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99833864,0.0010522653,0.00020485774,0.00009721502,0.00026956302,0.000037442784],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063896715,0.00008404153,0.00020155084,0.00008627672,0.0010681216,0.00003181766,0.00033761823,0.00007079959,0.00004453679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015392486,0.00004069443,0.0001584544,0.0007724346,0.0045390087,0.000105116655,0.000031200438,0.00047778763,0.0000019786567],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012974822,0.000056878205,0.044774853,9.978131e-7,0.00017528216,3.3431607e-7,0.00018729307,0.000024144641,0.000007586939,0.95071864,0.0000058868545,0.003918343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027584322,0.000033015258,0.08008369,0.000025587553,0.000066362794,0.0000039058123,0.0016062813,0.000036159545,0.00001468189,0.91628146,0.0015116665,0.00006133524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016184045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0304669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75938374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008845654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004590134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2615095983","doi":"10.1017/s0008423917000014","title":"The Politics of Judicial Appointment: Do Party Connections Impede the Appointment of Women to Canada's Federally Appointed Courts?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; Western University; Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Government (linguistics); Proxy (statistics); Political science; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.01959050836813158,"score_gpt":0.29197511719766683,"score_spread":0.27238460882953525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2615095983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8631231,0.00018704192,0.00009136034,0.09633004,0.0012907366,0.00029627094,0.00010067644,0.0000031720201,0.038577598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986486,0.000012375765,0.000026665104,0.00079259503,0.00040927756,0.0000060090806,1.2228008e-7,0.000003258287,0.00010113551],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970135,0.00010845275,0.00048485218,0.00013786512,0.0009210196,0.0013343167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99614054,0.00038984523,0.0003461224,0.00025770633,0.000991576,0.001874196],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00261738,0.00010655084,0.00025635128,0.00008821449,0.007723269,0.0002758266,0.0013473562,0.000035754503,0.000052622992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056545935,0.00006523964,0.0000890403,0.00023401043,0.0076219956,0.00013314225,0.000088064146,0.0001781392,0.0000023675013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074545896,0.000011270882,0.0018631767,0.000001691513,0.000028626666,0.000008918642,0.0021869077,0.0000067508713,0.000031900374,0.9942193,0.00089888327,0.0007351131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006307682,0.0005654398,0.3421729,0.0001948014,0.00009440575,0.00005245706,0.08413622,0.000018278242,0.00089366385,0.37251258,0.1983296,0.00039889824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97082156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98343647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6217067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023434733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028617585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2615242767","doi":"10.1089/elj.2016.0410","title":"Three Narratives About Canadian Election Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Election law; Law; Narrative; Legislation; Campaign finance; Federal election; Public administration; Politics; Voting","score_opus":0.02467884156776447,"score_gpt":0.32718143395171,"score_spread":0.30250259238394556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2615242767","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07519357,0.00064085244,0.00010817468,0.03133729,0.0008158492,0.000100249104,0.00002443188,0.000027839404,0.89175177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928823,0.0008087046,0.00005119734,0.0015594845,0.0041333865,0.0000037966595,0.0000013639531,0.0000067457445,0.0005530275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889636,0.000059391903,0.0001680077,0.00012182779,0.00022712738,0.0005272726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990624,0.00002910555,0.0001390114,0.00008618297,0.00023746579,0.00044583363],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030055127,0.000110966655,0.00013655808,0.000104667146,0.019756837,0.0007369769,0.00015772608,0.00009645778,0.000052455096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001701873,0.00010291211,0.000064388616,0.00007352563,0.0012246749,0.0004086705,0.000022310982,0.00025660402,0.000023665498],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035229748,0.000008884449,0.00084162434,0.0000012875978,0.00003314879,0.0000037997363,0.0013282731,4.206397e-7,0.000014297396,0.994657,0.0006327239,0.0024750433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000970004,0.000042944204,0.009324045,0.000014949595,0.000008346172,0.000036013906,0.00046239886,0.000001835332,0.00002590638,0.53612655,0.45376855,0.00009146721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95526034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98034537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9176887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003934549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085300975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9815193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2615320268","doi":"10.26530/oapen_627652","title":"Courts in Federal Countries : Federalists or Unitarists?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Jurisprudence; Law; Comparability; Power (physics); Federal court; Federalism; Public administration; Politics; Supreme court","score_opus":0.0396284747836156,"score_gpt":0.2712792012192337,"score_spread":0.23165072643561813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2615320268","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000077501565,0.001902652,0.00000603214,0.00010727821,0.0003152055,0.0002918252,0.00010714053,0.000036664136,0.9971557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0053422824,0.0016859003,0.000037783193,0.000036480145,0.00020385488,5.173896e-7,0.000012551886,0.0000074108575,0.9926732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987986,0.00008287929,0.00014450809,0.0002512332,0.00044988762,0.00027290045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991079,0.00010355468,0.00027369603,0.00019952162,0.00022483055,0.00009052625],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020178233,0.00018473316,0.00042596052,0.000019671981,0.0017183323,0.00008006682,0.0006182255,0.00030477004,0.00045661256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048263333,0.0002012513,0.00011029019,9.574428e-7,0.0018748017,0.00020759019,0.00023424605,0.0001598587,0.000008489928],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004925284,0.000042441057,0.00034314118,0.000083899446,0.00022658109,0.0003019142,0.032242034,0.0000020408806,4.189807e-7,0.7899635,0.1738141,0.0024874182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003634556,0.00003057508,0.0006439606,0.00025234153,0.00003852938,5.35183e-7,0.00067981135,5.912245e-7,8.6118723e-7,0.0039849533,0.9937729,0.0002314845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8729115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.954567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8199588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010466535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018371058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616110939","doi":"10.3138/9781487511470-004","title":"1. Introduction: Courts in Federal Countries","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.025375998151703952,"score_gpt":0.23860930382614323,"score_spread":0.21323330567443927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2616110939","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000016964545,0.0022536404,0.0000062470444,0.00046353924,0.00045825023,0.0001642575,0.000035878227,0.000024530375,0.99657667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004749781,0.0026479524,0.000029854913,0.000015642676,0.00081281015,1.8277407e-7,0.000004038877,0.000004864292,0.99173486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992253,0.000021599246,0.0000958204,0.0002045434,0.00030422187,0.00014848972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994156,0.000026738353,0.00018534236,0.00016001366,0.00016276838,0.000049541188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013659884,0.00011951562,0.0002664526,0.000013532892,0.00094877026,0.000030173722,0.00031601058,0.00018704502,0.0006610064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016477263,0.0001480562,0.00008573027,2.2284256e-7,0.0015171791,0.00014958526,0.00013012522,0.00010658982,0.000010353867],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057046007,0.0000056680674,0.00003726167,0.000009826758,0.00006121071,0.000022599861,0.006784743,8.646183e-7,4.3226248e-7,0.9763333,0.014808171,0.0018788325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016692083,0.000015388154,0.00015385098,0.00007157335,0.000027531796,3.6481333e-7,0.00025800557,2.1186759e-7,0.0000015918133,0.008979924,0.99018127,0.00014334873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5820469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6485227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9753731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036619473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002603319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72972697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620045244","doi":"10.26686/wgtn.17012060.v1","title":"The implications of a supreme law Bill of Rights for judicial appointments in New Zealand","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Political science; Bill of rights; Commission; Judicial review; Human rights","score_opus":0.026396855507976283,"score_gpt":0.3290383673521254,"score_spread":0.3026415118441491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620045244","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03655587,0.0006139617,0.00012497089,0.0049825762,0.0009728763,0.0018395286,0.000098959055,0.000027717886,0.95478356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99170196,0.00012985746,0.000060977243,0.000042019357,0.00022806211,0.00006366915,0.000082796956,0.000004005197,0.00768666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991489,0.000038179838,0.00031978163,0.00012767708,0.00020905452,0.00015642004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991768,0.00029277467,0.00020346923,0.000085822634,0.00020612412,0.000034996163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002704382,0.00008326628,0.00022543971,0.000041420477,0.000487652,0.000011217642,0.00020664796,0.00010567111,0.000023056182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009712426,0.000048941263,0.00009626953,0.00015049521,0.00024304102,0.000033720422,0.000010579406,0.000049332073,0.0000031914644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045905188,0.000030615352,0.0006521088,0.0000047334356,0.000035133144,1.7950851e-8,0.0015133205,6.9256663e-7,0.000026035998,0.9911747,0.005576552,0.0009401583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024194446,0.00003716541,0.008696585,0.000049766408,0.00003671934,2.171906e-8,0.0009508098,5.5503193e-7,0.00016259581,0.8335847,0.1561633,0.00007580317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35889545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8144228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9551461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035638852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004317738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6453737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620889541","doi":"","title":"The Supreme Court and the Conventions of the Constitution","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CentAUR (University of Reading)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Constitution; Political science; Precedent","score_opus":0.021405389479714404,"score_gpt":0.24513226203104263,"score_spread":0.22372687255132823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620889541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49300003,0.00059341226,0.00022274398,0.053630907,0.0008785474,0.00043180224,0.000028269753,0.000015510495,0.4511988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99804944,0.0007297225,0.000007815849,0.000018348366,0.000025453988,1.3086596e-7,3.0290792e-7,4.6942242e-7,0.0011683367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995884,0.00006938324,0.000046149824,0.000056718814,0.0001560706,0.00008331139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948466,0.00012295836,0.00014338912,0.00013619824,0.00009262308,0.000020147696],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039225482,0.000030933636,0.000075503565,0.0000075280977,0.0068063186,0.000025789594,0.00035380796,0.000023445735,0.000017278284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016888964,0.00001846542,0.00006731408,0.000040216426,0.010600239,0.00010047854,0.00014542499,0.000049015776,0.0000028301656],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020465663,0.0000069541284,0.015153964,0.0000015292641,0.000030678282,2.427615e-7,0.0023646136,3.1423676e-7,0.000018042963,0.9806096,0.00101911,0.00077449443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019055436,0.000019409757,0.3358502,0.00013782439,0.00025503716,0.0000022455145,0.09711919,0.00004091362,0.00008830596,0.09508911,0.46935374,0.00013847297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01739301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011925819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88552046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002461275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010086891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620945719","doi":"","title":"Developments in Access to Justice: Trial Lawyers' Association of British Columbia and the Supreme Court's Use of the Constitution to Protect Public Access to the Courts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Constitution; Dissent; Legislature; Economic Justice; Criticism; Constitutional law; Politics","score_opus":0.05770260569019013,"score_gpt":0.3168248264091571,"score_spread":0.25912222071896696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620945719","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9532343,0.00026844436,0.0004511937,0.040551968,0.00085673213,0.0023946473,0.000022733224,0.000009211615,0.0022107325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99829257,0.00034227065,0.000015647198,0.0006853593,0.00024476193,0.00007778799,5.1881887e-7,0.0000034069653,0.00033768066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99727994,0.00055009767,0.00037205502,0.00014534067,0.0008754471,0.00077714515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986527,0.00024817977,0.00027802523,0.00008529523,0.0006291277,0.00010667174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064179148,0.00007401794,0.00022190236,0.000050515882,0.0009189585,0.00072351197,0.0006790727,0.000066093315,0.0000054912807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004599928,0.000057247864,0.000054565746,0.00069498975,0.00033555302,0.0005245559,0.0002595081,0.00045588627,0.0000017464905],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0067124944,0.00048095954,0.3732658,0.000022875867,0.00084478164,0.0000044029252,0.017532514,0.0009878927,0.000048888793,0.5106315,0.05288122,0.0365867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.035852082,0.00082036795,0.43741107,0.0005950937,0.00054266845,0.0000636013,0.030547896,0.000025132793,0.000045004515,0.22093835,0.27231374,0.0008449821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.089048065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80756426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7185162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001304853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005979779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621474074","doi":"","title":"Peter Hogg Tells the Amusing Story of Canadian Constitutional Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitutional law; Political science","score_opus":0.0611330806102806,"score_gpt":0.29895613059893567,"score_spread":0.23782304998865506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621474074","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009630143,0.000117590665,0.00002871308,0.011498067,0.00042684632,0.000072398674,0.000012865441,0.000008054444,0.9782053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99775183,0.000042114243,0.000053415,0.00092543213,0.00024119444,0.000002228189,4.6839568e-7,8.161397e-7,0.0009825049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994606,0.000047718597,0.00006527234,0.00007219769,0.00019460125,0.00015964101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995857,0.00008597638,0.00004831886,0.00011031703,0.0000978815,0.000071823095],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041449303,0.0000405428,0.00006618138,0.000034028435,0.006334005,0.000060816576,0.00024278658,0.000029625171,0.0002965163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019024633,0.000027362925,0.000040237177,0.000047382426,0.008059366,0.000127082,0.00003411222,0.00007308292,0.000050392166],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.866284e-7,0.000003618667,0.002554762,4.0686294e-7,0.00001211034,0.0000016431579,0.00061747077,0.0000015766099,0.000016316028,0.99380994,0.002625402,0.00035576726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053954154,0.0000036317424,0.019887045,0.0000106101525,0.000009243514,6.2332816e-7,0.0014098352,7.252626e-7,0.000039652296,0.016706401,0.96181893,0.000059361977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84343493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94466156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9881217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057745776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000767392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9949596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622325340","doi":"10.1177/1532440017713314","title":"A Squire Index Update","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"State Politics & Policy Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":149,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Squire; Measure (data warehouse); Legislature; Session (web analytics); Index (typography); Quarter (Canadian coin); Professionalization; Political science; Computer science; Law; Geography; Data mining; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026122424876918196,"score_gpt":0.3540305868266478,"score_spread":0.3279081619497296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2622325340","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3267083,0.00015984557,0.00044387954,0.057318818,0.0008587749,0.00029782276,0.00023804369,0.0001865601,0.61378795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938285,0.00009063538,0.00005004613,0.0013070843,0.0016584824,0.000014563678,0.0000034348345,0.000010160282,0.0030371214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983533,0.000073252704,0.00020894241,0.00021024037,0.0003819182,0.0007723169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904555,0.000034544966,0.00014705387,0.00034746868,0.00015619604,0.00026918008],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022413522,0.00014405444,0.00018805359,0.00009324207,0.003817707,0.00039156774,0.0005305218,0.00006465418,0.00004297726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020088062,0.00014192858,0.000091113594,0.000083201245,0.0018484024,0.00035285662,0.00005349065,0.000121695564,0.00040985548],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038089104,0.000024327965,0.003944184,0.0000028189304,0.000029809995,0.000011546311,0.012149524,3.6281637e-7,0.00000422054,0.9690707,0.0011571782,0.013601545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023431795,0.000059010417,0.039553836,0.00001560094,0.000011278412,0.0000013060304,0.0028857226,0.0000074085824,0.0000064443702,0.7555082,0.20151262,0.000204289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20902239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013629511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6671202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016239544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008034342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622551058","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199578610.013.0005","title":"Carving Out Typologies and Accounting for Differences Across Systems: Towards a Methodology of Transnational Constitutionalism","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Carving; Context (archaeology); Relation (database); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Geography; Politics; Computer science; Archaeology; Data mining; Democracy","score_opus":0.25808081922421444,"score_gpt":0.4191916085749884,"score_spread":0.16111078935077394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2622551058","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010466556,0.074962445,0.028141756,0.0058751446,0.012556543,0.0018640249,0.0042466326,0.00020868212,0.86167824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97535527,0.014658638,0.0023193934,0.00007261236,0.0016142923,0.00019511569,0.00010023519,0.000009449063,0.0056749866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792403,0.00027315484,0.00046810007,0.0003163135,0.0005262069,0.0004922207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969595,0.001996938,0.0003164706,0.00007565004,0.0005774106,0.00007403776],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015786422,0.0002384859,0.0007631457,0.0000877136,0.0010758755,0.00008048987,0.0002768429,0.0004922586,0.00007330075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001115364,0.00018850912,0.0001511208,0.0001041328,0.0029430839,0.00018403411,0.000116753006,0.00019367675,0.0000016500943],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016750737,0.000021533831,0.0033129486,0.0002215656,0.00021673464,3.4908774e-7,0.0043954733,9.725399e-7,0.000001196919,0.9832538,0.0017454785,0.0068132035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074271706,0.00007726626,0.013890559,0.0005930297,0.0005112149,0.000010183799,0.06903439,0.000012742374,0.000013559252,0.10709574,0.80708665,0.00093192514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010420135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006799351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9648887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000109638684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2623432494","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199208425.003.0008","title":"The Judicialization of Politics","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":221,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Politics; Demise; Legitimacy; Law; Judicial review; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03140422771101241,"score_gpt":0.24026067469388138,"score_spread":0.20885644698286898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2623432494","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000010802045,0.00024981023,0.000057802208,0.00018163369,0.00016254258,0.0001637862,0.00003359964,0.00003212795,0.9991079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0060426556,0.0027070388,0.0000154489,0.000048327027,0.0002450614,1.4018731e-7,0.000004710571,0.000004997908,0.99093163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925697,0.00003157865,0.000112859474,0.00011744296,0.000316796,0.00016432472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937177,0.000089757494,0.00016273587,0.0001111514,0.00021378072,0.000050820337],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011387825,0.000101854246,0.00015645933,0.00003818408,0.0013530964,0.0000187656,0.0002863313,0.00015861502,0.000008462362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024862433,0.00009428398,0.00010336012,0.000008275941,0.0011743929,0.000032827535,0.000081416336,0.00011224799,4.4043773e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000112956595,0.0000028664658,0.0000034384352,0.0000023612874,0.00004386256,0.000003920861,0.00042776286,0.0000010465193,3.4339297e-7,0.9904753,0.0010704204,0.007957387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062347775,0.000015724905,0.000015008294,0.000038805345,0.000071711904,1.3054763e-7,0.00022525487,6.133033e-7,0.0000039313727,0.10616621,0.8933112,0.00008905342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019621826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012239403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89224076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000117390664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002648717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2623466269","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1047","title":"Judging the Judges: Judicial Independence and Reforms to the Supreme Court of Canada Appointment Process","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial independence; Supreme court; Law; Charter; Political science; Jurisprudence; Independence (probability theory); Separation of powers; Substantive due process; Context (archaeology); Constitutional law; Constitution","score_opus":0.027055425205928033,"score_gpt":0.2933051620193456,"score_spread":0.26624973681341757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2623466269","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051015534,0.18500496,0.00025069795,0.54787767,0.0013541825,0.0059850044,0.000113834794,0.00011469478,0.20828344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9770659,0.014069176,0.00002411453,0.008438304,0.00024607818,0.00009991006,0.0000020959633,0.000006761842,0.00004761444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977969,0.00010523804,0.00037248674,0.00025043316,0.0010834881,0.00039144995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907744,0.00008915204,0.00014235402,0.00022434331,0.0003414274,0.00012527347],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015771046,0.00016127632,0.00034741295,0.000013281738,0.001542235,0.000037945785,0.00053726765,0.00004327805,0.00006128463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034110752,0.000086462984,0.000067688896,0.00037461103,0.0007244524,0.00013463513,0.00014078386,0.00018717434,0.000010918722],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001709643,0.000050482562,0.001101595,0.00040903414,0.00010398111,0.000008888762,0.0040396904,0.00007664067,0.000009000454,0.9826092,0.0066474373,0.004926954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027915213,0.00007492571,0.0022420841,0.003080014,0.00017987692,0.000011137828,0.004329766,0.000001778652,0.00008817435,0.04621302,0.94314635,0.0003536976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.57631505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9010285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93649894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029185886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017216997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2624827431","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195335354.003.0028","title":"Democratic Reform: The Search for Guiding Principles","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Government (linguistics); Politics; Political science; Public administration; Democratic system; Electoral reform; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.10933789100433743,"score_gpt":0.2741597586145068,"score_spread":0.16482186761016937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2624827431","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000090173075,0.00007741795,0.00020760379,0.00062041247,0.0003161225,0.0006065591,0.0000635407,0.00006299416,0.9979552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0040804436,0.0004378961,0.00021656949,0.0000874638,0.00041097228,0.0000029001917,0.0000074115205,0.000012408489,0.99474394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989631,0.000031362822,0.00012180321,0.00023492068,0.0003574883,0.0002913354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992293,0.0001631626,0.000106173655,0.00019063438,0.00022604552,0.00008469402],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003729052,0.00016315856,0.00020044945,0.000051211395,0.0031360502,0.000053314576,0.0005898067,0.00027196997,0.000022941755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027590448,0.0001315524,0.00017695907,0.000008282498,0.0012749453,0.00006499975,0.00029437634,0.00026902655,0.0000012489057],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028599095,0.0000028282275,0.0000040469768,0.00000991668,0.00007960902,0.0000055862597,0.0009426816,8.56894e-7,0.0000075037215,0.99683625,0.000383704,0.0016984511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000117546166,0.000018401359,0.0000068923227,0.000052861244,0.00009417262,6.2836966e-7,0.0009861465,0.000003558735,0.000040334602,0.021100301,0.97740793,0.00017125368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002409583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004222808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9770242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025952852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000377933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99816173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626433881","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3150","title":"The Judicial Role in a Diverse Federation: Lessons from the Supreme Court of Canada, by Robert Schertzer","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; State (computer science); Federalism; Public administration; Supreme court; Law; Power (physics); Population; Corporate governance; Politics; Sociology; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.027442619741028955,"score_gpt":0.28258351784514074,"score_spread":0.2551408981041118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626433881","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023214575,0.0029904358,0.000041319156,0.13805538,0.0010664841,0.00015400465,0.00007786445,0.000006804967,0.83439314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982063,0.0004485595,0.000017074528,0.00038564578,0.0006516112,0.000003897973,0.0000012221699,0.0000031748186,0.0002825003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987008,0.00015479779,0.00020564809,0.00009883388,0.0005728961,0.00026704444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992094,0.00021453624,0.00020918643,0.0001364227,0.00015235499,0.0000780872],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007000189,0.000078979116,0.00013418216,0.0000051447128,0.0123232575,0.000350765,0.0005772703,0.000049919166,0.0000911826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002953685,0.000048411497,0.000056802706,0.00003430566,0.0008845003,0.0002016703,0.00009182299,0.00025518707,0.0000035652977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035641307,0.000032490094,0.015076893,2.6823082e-7,0.00006788109,0.000011650752,0.0014824893,0.000016100386,0.00008186526,0.954827,0.025800046,0.002567657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089854404,0.000030282257,0.084513344,0.0001047991,0.00006088014,0.000005980735,0.018983128,0.00004753247,0.0001668119,0.41305292,0.48187155,0.00026423897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9949674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97499174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015042443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008419861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9889626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W263041619","doi":"","title":"Lysander Spooner’s The Unconstitutionality of Slavery: A Case Study in Constitutional Hermeneutics, Ethical Argument, and Practical Reason","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sound Ideas (University of Puget Sound)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hermeneutics; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.0719415135001265,"score_gpt":0.3447929468083388,"score_spread":0.27285143330821227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W263041619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9815417,0.0002546264,0.0006184855,0.002656212,0.00020679011,0.00034236113,0.000031381474,0.000017021914,0.014331421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995086,0.00007614792,0.00014888869,0.00010610512,0.00009631421,0.0000011259746,0.0000028141842,0.0000019560366,0.000058029913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828845,0.00048280426,0.00019493693,0.00019698658,0.0005471103,0.00028973518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881274,0.00057292613,0.00015266029,0.0001249625,0.000204189,0.00013254063],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018178261,0.00011516308,0.000257022,0.00007407444,0.0012143959,0.000021167376,0.000112986665,0.00015728737,0.000098511024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046019527,0.00010755813,0.00007958453,0.00030676957,0.008148271,0.00035587818,0.0001603612,0.00033986339,0.000007831724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047469275,0.00031256842,0.26216096,0.000005739575,0.00008182688,0.00009818872,0.010839962,0.0000067344877,9.1002727e-7,0.72634304,0.00009020575,0.000012388238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006916666,0.000042511543,0.047896426,0.000016690248,0.00012927869,0.00014435918,0.14755209,0.000006902997,1.7740288e-7,0.80164886,0.0017419399,0.00012912584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025237724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034462117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21426453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018083699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064748485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.994551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W264282437","doi":"","title":"Two Valuable Treatises on Civil Procedure","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New York University journal of international law & politics/New York University journal of international law and politics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil procedure; Jury; German; Law; Adversarial system; Adversary; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Procedural law; Convergence (economics); Jury trial; Civil litigation; Sociology; History; Public law; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.025370897373434297,"score_gpt":0.26416211747270807,"score_spread":0.23879122009927378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W264282437","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06667236,0.0011434522,0.00078482775,0.02796656,0.0026745137,0.0001560491,0.00024456045,0.00003524534,0.90032244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9522737,0.0011674827,0.002455174,0.0022693959,0.0054404875,2.500371e-8,0.0000096704425,0.000014985445,0.036369078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970078,0.00017678691,0.0006108372,0.00022445084,0.001507253,0.0004728675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958887,0.00045858813,0.0009898875,0.000112609836,0.0017209146,0.0008292838],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004604363,0.00028783077,0.00047243116,0.00051450793,0.0010193352,0.00017723565,0.0012250895,0.00017446707,0.00048928434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021458812,0.0002994206,0.0004315299,0.0001952453,0.00094959803,0.0010643153,0.0001425079,0.00061228883,0.000023373024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034351076,0.0002360917,0.0018812126,0.0000047186545,0.0007050662,0.00021061224,0.0020321275,0.0005626337,0.000022023776,0.9780389,0.015693547,0.00026956946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029777363,0.00031423845,0.00050994864,0.0003324894,0.00027740307,0.00033427472,0.005932635,0.000023544802,0.00014692923,0.037256885,0.95160294,0.00029099782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013170336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077886875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.940782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017076412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002212557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2673999106","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198794356.013.25","title":"The Return of Legal Realism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Realism; Legal realism; Scholarship; Epistemology; Legal formalism; Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Political science; Legal profession; Comparative law; Black letter law","score_opus":0.031675224015381837,"score_gpt":0.23738781529129024,"score_spread":0.2057125912759084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2673999106","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004920251,0.00017564338,0.000011833875,0.00018972644,0.00031234013,0.00016096883,0.00006337335,0.00003452022,0.9990024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0037863213,0.001461131,0.000015405061,0.00002743072,0.00036666606,2.4705517e-7,0.0000030985243,0.0000061141527,0.99433357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991552,0.00003851944,0.00011131764,0.00016220011,0.0003531864,0.00017956972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925154,0.00010867016,0.00017611029,0.0001679594,0.00023659095,0.00005911267],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001912654,0.00011999862,0.00017850459,0.000031803742,0.0014090821,0.000027325312,0.0004524443,0.00018212509,0.000040611158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022738259,0.00010166642,0.00013779322,0.000006916597,0.0027602734,0.00004859356,0.00021492183,0.0001652662,0.0000011523574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042760817,0.0000019224556,0.0000020525863,0.0000030668407,0.00008368867,0.000011128663,0.00092311966,4.805952e-8,8.11631e-7,0.9879976,0.009133081,0.0018007489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007823586,0.000021854514,0.0000051686943,0.0000496783,0.00007101362,4.102447e-7,0.000563487,2.9001419e-7,0.000007124126,0.031335905,0.96775514,0.00011171501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005668802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059961053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95862204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000095091236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026000026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W269647062","doi":"","title":"Fixed Date Elections, Parliamentary Dissolutions and the Court","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General election; Political science; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.019420274401163777,"score_gpt":0.28348007827130917,"score_spread":0.2640598038701454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W269647062","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019344768,0.29545206,0.0000238951,0.5397721,0.0026406883,0.0028014185,0.00037329204,0.00010739318,0.13948438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6933414,0.26775742,0.00013799514,0.037312005,0.0005324474,0.00027002548,0.00006683695,0.000010850924,0.00057102944],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886084,0.00016231893,0.00020944102,0.0001970722,0.00019696013,0.00037339513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992384,0.00011161741,0.00005683758,0.00017310686,0.000056271656,0.00036381205],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072803884,0.000117615695,0.0002230321,0.00003832215,0.002339579,0.00005953324,0.00021903387,0.00004046379,0.001174947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014945485,0.00008670676,0.00007935514,0.00026666652,0.0015097397,0.00015154429,0.000032640117,0.00024473947,0.00010304135],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011344388,0.00003132891,0.0138774095,0.0000717415,0.00018891341,0.00001561697,0.0008410434,2.58374e-7,0.000013699996,0.40790272,0.5236581,0.05338784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018631371,0.0000060195603,0.0037016605,0.00017286323,0.000121017816,0.0000075512007,0.0009293581,0.0000018042275,7.0181176e-7,0.0032690144,0.99147964,0.00012405762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7989898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9704815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6739966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000108961816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006696685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2709722419","doi":"10.29173/alr1431","title":"Reducing the Democratic Deficit: Representation, Diversity and the Canadian Judiciary, or towards a Triple P Judiciary","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Democracy; Politics; Law; Diversity (politics); Statute; Judicial independence; Political science; Representation (politics); Democratic deficit; Judicial review; Judicial discretion; Openness to experience; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.04537311024812908,"score_gpt":0.3028270669859417,"score_spread":0.25745395673781263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2709722419","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010656416,0.087842844,0.0000016617091,0.15150136,0.00022746749,0.001311053,0.000006440652,0.000022180922,0.7484306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8919021,0.090663865,0.000007201022,0.015592402,0.00016946947,0.00004743405,0.0000030429046,0.000004127432,0.0016103789],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984408,0.0004676365,0.00024476764,0.0002160243,0.00033770048,0.00029304906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892503,0.00059771753,0.000071851224,0.00019603744,0.00008318414,0.00012620632],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010889168,0.00011365542,0.0002933879,0.000013529269,0.01011105,0.000060798753,0.00032347895,0.00004419466,0.0008095777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008067554,0.000059378675,0.000096855896,0.00045382808,0.0016115899,0.00014413327,0.00013232212,0.00013326354,0.00007227206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003346534,0.000015934073,0.0021659313,0.000041809777,0.00011538417,0.0000102171025,0.0072846,0.0000020234459,5.9022963e-8,0.9381755,0.020266483,0.031888574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058936933,0.000022114242,0.0136522055,0.0010986775,0.0006032504,0.000018694942,0.00091266865,0.000016612476,5.646311e-7,0.09911899,0.88367754,0.00028932365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99192446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9877974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8812457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009710841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044916707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9911777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2710390104","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2991600","title":"The Legislature, the Executive, and the Courts: The Delicate Balance of Power or Who is Running this Country Anyway?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Balance (ability); Executive power; Power (physics); Political science; Law; Separation of powers; Executive summary; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Politics; Psychology; Physics; Finance","score_opus":0.009999889367923941,"score_gpt":0.2666903719893797,"score_spread":0.2566904826214558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2710390104","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10946224,0.2755468,0.0007180944,0.28238416,0.0011212499,0.0011240036,0.0000221448,0.00005358274,0.32956773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86871266,0.12454622,0.000002523715,0.0017810258,0.0004031361,0.000009986563,1.7626112e-7,0.000005402531,0.004538891],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775743,0.0002535041,0.0002351088,0.00012399424,0.00055813696,0.0010718257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986598,0.00071568735,0.00023539382,0.00015218074,0.00020234636,0.000034627366],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034095405,0.00012102371,0.00016840482,0.00001389337,0.005266202,0.0001644636,0.00063910556,0.000055393357,0.000029486608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030292335,0.000041288196,0.00009280758,0.00030074274,0.0028710065,0.00013362331,0.0000762598,0.0011462198,0.0000045314127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022833084,0.000010362286,0.0025081004,4.1084692e-7,0.00019556876,0.0000012635546,0.0050670365,0.0000018830569,0.0000061745927,0.9833401,0.0065585864,0.002082205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048163842,0.00005392462,0.0019987188,0.000026218066,0.000062967636,0.00011272185,0.030010482,0.00001710634,0.000003770679,0.41820174,0.54893905,0.00009169769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003105014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010825121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7592504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017513683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015291225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2727835676","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2816666","title":"Triaging the Law: Developing the Common Law on the Indian Supreme Court","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Precedent; Common law; Political science","score_opus":0.02784006765148816,"score_gpt":0.28514113394849266,"score_spread":0.2573010662970045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2727835676","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15292305,0.0035429003,0.000582709,0.71706367,0.00074900314,0.00038688438,0.0000035774972,0.000047320707,0.1247009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910034,0.0034329284,0.0000017955397,0.004210817,0.00091004214,0.0000108232325,1.3951484e-7,0.000005625623,0.00042441802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975937,0.0003799459,0.0001773678,0.000103993225,0.00048630737,0.0012586658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988477,0.0008103183,0.00011138816,0.00011861872,0.00007610542,0.00003583747],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044852807,0.00010099335,0.00010761402,0.000015711845,0.0065126023,0.00013418954,0.00063985155,0.000039884657,0.00003182337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014071827,0.000035277404,0.00009416385,0.00016028501,0.0011181372,0.00012638113,0.00005546381,0.0008277113,0.00006579473],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014025722,0.0000067173814,0.000351107,1.5662552e-7,0.000073679,0.0000010662368,0.0019778868,6.5351287e-7,0.000012026863,0.99075,0.0003012226,0.0065114344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015840141,0.000030845797,0.00036101323,0.000036839792,0.000015302163,0.00001914053,0.014030323,1.9441923e-7,0.000030207295,0.81408584,0.17115705,0.00007485349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052870926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1646002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83808035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00074931746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016251964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2730947195","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2017.1345202","title":"The Achilles heel of the Canadian judiciary: the ethics of judicial appointments in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Dalhousie University","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Impartiality; Legitimacy; Supreme court; Transparency (behavior); Law; Judicial independence; Political science; Judicial review; Representativeness heuristic; Accountability; Judicial activism; Public administration; Psychology","score_opus":0.06405922035223657,"score_gpt":0.34062514127747484,"score_spread":0.27656592092523824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2730947195","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09368746,0.00088673114,0.0000025378022,0.63244903,0.002406923,0.00046143736,0.000088948196,0.000005643915,0.27001128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966594,0.00042255438,0.0000041435546,0.002618266,0.00018351317,0.000008506046,5.2754035e-7,0.0000037757643,0.000099311445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977208,0.0005226828,0.0002565237,0.0001161147,0.0010563845,0.00032752368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99773604,0.0013098269,0.00025755624,0.00034010902,0.00028787422,0.00006859875],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030246738,0.00008895309,0.0001599587,0.00001726841,0.009422161,0.00007580014,0.0011798056,0.00019031203,0.000007148701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006099447,0.000047682912,0.000067774956,0.00014988788,0.004165785,0.000075879114,0.00017564029,0.0014918303,0.0000014889804],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000079574,0.0000072427665,0.032152608,0.0000034791642,0.000031034644,0.0000025065444,0.00843914,0.000023031716,0.0000028661225,0.95790654,0.0007823497,0.0006412698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021916894,0.000015749494,0.49890128,0.00015591062,0.00003857683,7.332375e-7,0.015628733,0.000016094087,0.0000685418,0.18798469,0.296809,0.00016153847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9029719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045231785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028226618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99854434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2731113842","doi":"","title":"A Matter of Integrity: Rule of Law, the Remuneration Reference, and Access to Justice","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Remuneration; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Rule of law; Law and economics; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.04091267950648587,"score_gpt":0.32021749474789385,"score_spread":0.279304815241408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2731113842","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2621344,0.00034792206,0.000063130574,0.0017118262,0.00016931562,0.00017431969,0.000017517066,0.0000064152496,0.73537517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99495304,0.00041592904,0.00013106671,0.000056576635,0.000041895422,3.73225e-7,0.000017078752,0.0000022202016,0.0043818494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993983,0.000079506695,0.00008016752,0.00011700936,0.00024271508,0.00008229756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999304,0.00007870747,0.00019994052,0.000089894296,0.00029493563,0.00003252954],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020828017,0.0000719631,0.00022125427,0.000021495975,0.00039648183,0.000012055457,0.0002749703,0.00010988239,0.0011355738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047700283,0.000065509834,0.000043232838,0.000051106676,0.00035138952,0.00021022464,0.00006412412,0.00008077443,0.00000503849],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036558264,0.00007063811,0.0016094738,0.0003209739,0.00016791954,8.6561874e-7,0.14878368,0.0000047684175,0.0006491758,0.82805884,0.0047220807,0.01524599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003418804,0.00012507355,0.6698205,0.00049744145,0.00068937056,2.0005515e-7,0.29187495,0.000008894332,0.00018358255,0.0040821936,0.03207174,0.00030418087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7267615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82130873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82397664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058396618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010815918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2733508293","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199208425.003.0027","title":"Filling the Bench","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nomination; Supreme court; Political science; Law; State supreme court; Scholarship; Politics; State (computer science); Quarter (Canadian coin); Subject (documents); Supreme Court Decisions; History; Library science","score_opus":0.03838012953292725,"score_gpt":0.23250475848669958,"score_spread":0.19412462895377233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2733508293","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000011999255,0.00027503094,0.000036007386,0.00045452628,0.00018146717,0.0002054841,0.000029909706,0.00006828407,0.9987373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0030593085,0.0013767796,0.000028181485,0.00019519778,0.0003568103,2.6768097e-7,0.000004397008,0.00000554863,0.9949735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999147,0.000031878957,0.000082679544,0.00019551822,0.0003346927,0.00020825418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951106,0.00008425655,0.00009564321,0.00013911308,0.00010490663,0.00006499347],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013729761,0.00014488622,0.00016615311,0.000037750047,0.0018110656,0.000039942002,0.00043545288,0.0001882902,0.00006380997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011763759,0.00012547286,0.00014502439,0.000007631993,0.00083368924,0.0000490977,0.00013084356,0.00026055085,0.000002729686],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010013702,0.0000023461996,0.0000018720765,0.0000014959296,0.000048324695,0.000020949374,0.00081745867,0.0000022159463,2.2391376e-7,0.9806583,0.0025699781,0.015866837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006529422,0.000011929492,0.000011505685,0.000039554114,0.0000806099,4.3374123e-7,0.00033230995,8.7910007e-7,0.0000011365402,0.034103896,0.9651978,0.00015464753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018159868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013693585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9626278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001268927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017839912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2734096431","doi":"","title":"'I Simply Do Not Believe': A Case Study of Credibility Determinations in Canadian Refugee Adjudication","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Adjudication; Credibility; Political science; Refugee law; Immigration; Law; Discretion; Consistency (knowledge bases)","score_opus":0.0398434952935165,"score_gpt":0.3379336883688801,"score_spread":0.2980901930753636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2734096431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95946527,0.00006888183,0.0000023215696,0.0017480393,0.00020881736,0.00045533082,0.000048223676,0.000017876884,0.03798527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99943566,0.000022275222,0.000035702247,0.00017277343,0.00016130981,0.00005660174,0.0000021776364,0.000004198699,0.00010929047],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986217,0.00015674467,0.00029295028,0.00026628058,0.00033855668,0.00032376897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884564,0.00009695959,0.00016379227,0.00040461743,0.00022291578,0.00026610028],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096740515,0.00009428461,0.00019147227,0.00007808291,0.0026777065,0.00011011141,0.00036291854,0.00008231712,0.00009098137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013222381,0.00009790481,0.000043788426,0.0001574263,0.0006772173,0.00036963096,0.000081643986,0.00015585947,0.000033200035],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022838642,0.000466994,0.70340526,0.000008415153,0.00004290062,0.00047898846,0.012192265,0.000022389266,0.000028621997,0.2765983,0.0002830498,0.006449952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009923979,0.00015222291,0.92187536,0.000058272166,0.00005462546,0.00001724211,0.021752916,0.000021962302,0.00003563397,0.015625158,0.039089207,0.00032498152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99116623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26097313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032936115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075898226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2734258215","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1265","title":"Book Review: Constitutional Rights After Globilization, by Gavin W. Anderson","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.011362915262418446,"score_gpt":0.2844058235286743,"score_spread":0.2730429082662558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2734258215","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000039236806,0.28621364,0.007947853,0.0057962486,0.0005809883,0.00018168625,0.00001826905,0.000039935905,0.69918215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95072514,0.024862684,0.00014654771,0.02153395,0.0009882323,0.000008067711,0.000010784882,0.000004862286,0.0017197302],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982969,0.00011016388,0.00035038378,0.0001734695,0.0006764667,0.0003926086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914765,0.00008005447,0.00013759635,0.00006883148,0.0003241368,0.00024172205],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010558229,0.00013061834,0.00019072929,0.000030630996,0.0025389167,0.00007791717,0.00017239603,0.00007530945,0.002571614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008939074,0.00010884217,0.00011314049,0.00017181961,0.0019097268,0.00041311834,0.000027550353,0.00021273599,0.00012457311],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020274256,0.000050528877,0.0007058695,0.0000072136445,0.000030828036,0.00003963826,0.00009594851,8.606302e-7,0.000007008478,0.6890275,0.30969343,0.00032088137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021242688,0.000018424163,0.00057264016,0.00028825572,0.000047276062,0.00005636199,0.000062432315,3.989847e-7,0.000025813551,0.045023657,0.9535365,0.00015581495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009503734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07454923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9506859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017838093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002009848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2736401150","doi":"","title":"Conceptual Precision and Parliamentary Systems of Rights: Disambiguating “Dialogue”","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliamentary sovereignty; Sovereignty; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Judicial review; Human rights; Government (linguistics); Parliamentary procedure; Sociology; Politics; Parliament","score_opus":0.03630339283605489,"score_gpt":0.2698295430549229,"score_spread":0.23352615021886802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2736401150","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89734423,0.0079761455,0.0014707494,0.00091833656,0.0010753416,0.001061818,0.000052549818,0.000109142,0.08999167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984287,0.0006521183,0.0003802159,0.000042011343,0.00034713052,0.00006480509,0.000010203905,0.0000034034695,0.00007139646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874496,0.0001432255,0.00036762678,0.00023717505,0.0002696892,0.0002373076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990491,0.00038626048,0.00015303596,0.00010436761,0.00019913069,0.00010807057],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032173505,0.00013038151,0.0002803477,0.00005862217,0.0010467044,0.0000742642,0.00014805136,0.00008677411,0.000114353694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028132324,0.00011271145,0.00006019858,0.00016755941,0.0034742905,0.00033856797,0.00007948184,0.0000841408,0.000046467238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006058308,0.000049493578,0.00998929,0.0000138373,0.000048818834,0.0000021519327,0.0030105463,0.000080039186,0.00024439517,0.9849927,0.0004129045,0.0011498075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038075442,0.00052123854,0.040679295,0.004509071,0.0005515948,0.00008013635,0.34477273,0.00066801964,0.00084421254,0.26343784,0.3375239,0.0026043958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056790657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037361775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7215548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007677866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016466925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99923766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2736829470","doi":"10.29173/alr785","title":"Modernizing Judicial Review of the Exercise of Prerogative Powers in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Justiciability; Judicial review; Law; Statutory law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.030854693897113115,"score_gpt":0.3055984712408487,"score_spread":0.2747437773437356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2736829470","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023211273,0.5724035,4.0794245e-7,0.017529935,0.0003197912,0.00089176686,0.000010304312,0.0000017894956,0.40652138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59326917,0.40493432,0.000004231152,0.0016963603,0.00002020604,0.000016008154,4.1486408e-7,0.0000018531663,0.000057425863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896425,0.0001145749,0.00032540614,0.00010998457,0.0003425882,0.00014317555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990449,0.00013662611,0.0003761928,0.0002530811,0.00015691097,0.000032312837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041364323,0.00007335849,0.000435381,0.000004441045,0.00044389185,0.0000048414704,0.0004832088,0.000017698416,0.00008665087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013599392,0.000050123068,0.000097223754,0.000107570035,0.00063558423,0.0000971892,0.00011110931,0.00006720965,0.000002969437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059533254,0.000036608795,0.010679364,0.0074564815,0.0000543734,0.000002097472,0.000994121,0.0000010242552,0.00000257831,0.95879954,0.00532083,0.01664701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021763345,0.000012812803,0.013076598,0.33841497,0.00032883402,6.1951687e-7,0.00036110694,0.0000014331998,0.000065490756,0.009315401,0.63792294,0.0002821572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9965953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94948417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000112163165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011591652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34141022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737906729","doi":"","title":"The structural conception of rights and judicial balancing","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Rhetoric; Adjudication; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027079022674977072,"score_gpt":0.26357582417521647,"score_spread":0.23649680150023938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737906729","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74094903,0.01744099,0.0003978745,0.005119875,0.0017472099,0.0005373227,0.00002778061,0.00011894953,0.23366097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977004,0.0014884315,0.00010574534,0.000034500925,0.0005308703,0.000008313453,0.0000012933664,0.000001889564,0.00012859066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913967,0.00008079853,0.00022467738,0.00014952492,0.00020398763,0.00020133454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993853,0.00024527864,0.00010578477,0.00007832645,0.00012777207,0.000057521916],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022742737,0.000090081216,0.00015327011,0.000029882074,0.0026611013,0.000049618564,0.00012833299,0.000058239995,0.00006798773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020245582,0.00006633249,0.000053870514,0.0001569571,0.0035367971,0.00014073148,0.000040811254,0.00008094088,0.0000141532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058357114,0.000008479938,0.003391782,0.0000038133262,0.000026471234,0.0000020155344,0.0021086382,0.000014288593,0.00007124758,0.9912558,0.00029336053,0.002818265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001417212,0.00013090666,0.01609736,0.00062391337,0.00021690187,0.00005091413,0.026660055,0.00091578654,0.00030192835,0.44607994,0.5066364,0.000868688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002705181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005429498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54517585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053266114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006198942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2738154899","doi":"","title":"The Partial Commencement of Acts: A Constitutional Criticism of the Lieutenant Governor in Council's \"Line-Item Veto\" Power","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Separation of powers; Supreme court; Veto; Legislation; Legislature; Doctrine; Political science; Democracy; Enumerated powers; Power (physics); Context (archaeology); Compromise; Politics; History","score_opus":0.04802638586106917,"score_gpt":0.27901913326385525,"score_spread":0.23099274740278608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2738154899","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4078463,0.013271561,0.0007925557,0.061079793,0.0030062152,0.0023729035,0.0005088981,0.00009759964,0.5110242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99669784,0.0024111962,0.000059722082,0.00025461704,0.0001554365,0.000050300318,0.000002242652,0.000003253456,0.00036536274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768406,0.00020746386,0.00065293064,0.00023303491,0.0008458876,0.00037662077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983309,0.00073156494,0.00019868976,0.000243097,0.00042385413,0.0000719152],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011102555,0.00016606961,0.00030909566,0.000024706842,0.0014100823,0.000040005925,0.0004993336,0.00009569804,0.00016215935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001059985,0.00010719624,0.00017293116,0.0004227929,0.010466969,0.00015033277,0.000094974435,0.00017832569,0.000020153204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007535657,0.0002012921,0.004497729,0.000016054186,0.00005878026,0.0000054934894,0.0015581177,0.00042272845,0.00015376731,0.9918366,0.00040470497,0.00076934265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007701027,0.000061918974,0.0036124506,0.00065774296,0.000059056627,0.000011604229,0.005281066,0.000073293086,0.0003912192,0.01192122,0.97692406,0.00023628127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023553667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007883555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97991544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041117225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025625252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2742847932","doi":"","title":"A Revised Theory of Judicial Independence","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial independence; Impartiality; Judicial discretion; Judicial activism; Law; Independence (probability theory); Political science; Politics; Judicial opinion; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.014201713751702842,"score_gpt":0.28338576622201284,"score_spread":0.26918405247031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2742847932","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41689682,0.033379585,0.015895834,0.01613122,0.00094529404,0.00048063818,0.0000048806683,0.0001166482,0.5161491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918772,0.006881612,0.00001993967,0.00022581988,0.00058147236,8.050201e-7,2.0070013e-7,0.0000021512792,0.0004108087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801,0.00017526967,0.00019958548,0.00009303496,0.00047660238,0.0010455102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995375,0.00006201697,0.00013343751,0.000050748065,0.00016109162,0.00005518677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031528596,0.000069257374,0.00014980845,0.00005607361,0.0006657766,0.00001903592,0.0002432696,0.000060843322,0.000055704273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035413908,0.00005970833,0.00009531085,0.00022913385,0.00031258742,0.00013864874,0.000012918502,0.00070237386,0.000014844509],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046136953,0.000031587653,0.0005923863,3.2550028e-7,0.00003167874,0.0000015602375,0.00071284134,0.0000013854053,0.000080559854,0.94576544,0.000041180974,0.05269493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017855846,0.0001407521,0.0026974895,0.000020719986,0.000021443411,0.000014745918,0.005058439,3.0531757e-7,0.000021639544,0.9889204,0.002853831,0.00007167053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005379883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021492147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5749804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003403698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003622662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6426447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2744308588","doi":"10.4337/cilj.2016.01.08","title":"Book Review","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge International Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Computer science; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.024264275700757253,"score_gpt":0.306161533687821,"score_spread":0.2818972579870638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2744308588","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000016328893,0.40289882,0.00036966195,0.26458636,0.0070031546,0.000051649036,0.000051591025,0.00001116351,0.32501125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019047193,0.6744338,0.00004820449,0.07019533,0.010391029,0.000008445864,0.0000024902615,0.000010786059,0.22586267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787265,0.00018180604,0.00048900617,0.00020240805,0.0008715079,0.00038260498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985515,0.0001847148,0.00027084295,0.00008651295,0.0006561101,0.0002503118],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006805452,0.00017016815,0.00024395171,0.000038790637,0.0010044638,0.00008978057,0.0005151584,0.0000828749,0.01246617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003324513,0.00011971136,0.0002907548,0.00012698842,0.001630367,0.00089331815,0.00010153072,0.00023517228,0.0023581274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006307613,0.000023191744,0.000058540827,0.000009679938,0.00010408007,0.00005887748,0.00001657728,1.2563058e-7,0.000009517483,0.5218855,0.45403004,0.023797538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028477143,0.000026572035,0.00031721353,0.0043901294,0.00006995199,0.00037875303,0.000034629895,6.786462e-7,0.000020386318,0.007608718,0.9866836,0.00018456396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008934595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017808125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53265357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005641917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025057077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2744443919","doi":"10.3138/9781442616615-036","title":"34. Chief Justice of Ontario","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.03234986421228128,"score_gpt":0.22343911489058693,"score_spread":0.19108925067830565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2744443919","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006222831,0.0012505748,0.000016597025,0.000021393385,0.00023300378,0.00020534624,0.00003768131,0.000020137733,0.99815303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003374956,0.0005315816,0.00018001211,0.000013407735,0.00011223825,1.4668969e-7,0.0000030481585,0.0000047900494,0.9957798],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992119,0.000017737959,0.00012171479,0.00016632468,0.00034523098,0.00013705871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927765,0.00004687416,0.00022529929,0.0001284646,0.00024989885,0.00007181066],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000076487406,0.00012588753,0.00029996698,0.0000122584015,0.00035822947,0.000006418172,0.0003357063,0.0001936558,0.0019954047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009463041,0.00014719224,0.00014811335,6.04935e-7,0.0010627976,0.000089088724,0.00016327751,0.00010640239,0.0000144897585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026077185,0.000010514393,0.000008089956,0.00002302601,0.00014234972,0.000004337799,0.01942331,6.193899e-7,0.0000032993112,0.9740588,0.0037773442,0.0025222437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013613982,0.00003106931,0.00013102812,0.00010112144,0.0002909944,1.3732772e-7,0.00042223342,2.1881509e-7,0.000004702442,0.005352347,0.99338955,0.00014044167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9886241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96400625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9896122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006682075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064031273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989169},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2745328100","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3215613","title":"The I·CONnect-Clough Center 2017 Global Review of Constitutional Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Audience measurement; Law; Political science; Center (category theory); Judicial review; Field (mathematics); Constitutional law","score_opus":0.018925989851656597,"score_gpt":0.32019418638042196,"score_spread":0.30126819652876535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2745328100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021464678,0.16681726,0.0009441696,0.029349366,0.0014935747,0.0002367167,0.000024531704,0.000025936984,0.798962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8353208,0.16215548,0.000012139936,0.0010672187,0.001152649,0.0000031447623,0.0000010700692,0.0000015544771,0.00028597334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785423,0.00015615253,0.0002673761,0.00010843193,0.0004773647,0.0011364627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917,0.0000802968,0.00017366074,0.00008499369,0.00042779502,0.000063275766],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002267424,0.000086796965,0.00015335168,0.000009160352,0.002762102,0.000035669047,0.0003563023,0.000040265917,0.00007714583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031758344,0.00005756473,0.00013383687,0.00017951384,0.0051023103,0.00013121156,0.000045882247,0.0003660456,0.000082752864],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016427757,0.000021917844,0.00069508614,0.0000060196935,0.00009240239,8.114033e-7,0.000053857726,8.3084856e-8,0.0000013273847,0.993007,0.0032839933,0.002821066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013780774,0.000057411486,0.000099946345,0.0002460545,0.00002227489,0.000067593064,0.0005675112,1.5319539e-7,0.000002647305,0.50114495,0.49759325,0.000060407332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012271118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025260266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8331743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005936794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042958506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99853617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751794763","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v10n4p139","title":"The Influence of Liberty Concepts on the Legal Classification of Constitutions and Constitutional Governments","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Constitution; Constitutionality; Liberalism; Law; Political science; Sovereignty; Classical liberalism; Government (linguistics); Constitutional law; The Republic; Law and economics; Power (physics); Sociology; Democracy; Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03703501086575625,"score_gpt":0.330836505034972,"score_spread":0.29380149416921575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751794763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8385195,0.00039240907,0.000053784035,0.01188723,0.00020480661,0.00007932724,0.000046846773,0.0000012227,0.14881489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99912316,0.0005249852,0.000015420152,0.00017643067,0.00008793221,7.8112936e-7,9.503414e-8,5.836314e-7,0.00007059485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993249,0.000046490524,0.00020637216,0.000038942617,0.00029677726,0.000086478896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891317,0.00035283456,0.00037465824,0.00006933574,0.00024313272,0.000046850415],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004156315,0.000040099127,0.00009632386,0.000008110564,0.0020535286,0.00006300891,0.00014624167,0.000026346112,0.0000035685805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005677544,0.00002174218,0.000032940476,0.000017389531,0.018909259,0.00013959307,0.00003372054,0.00008138004,3.5510047e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000081692,0.000017598002,0.0049547553,0.0000017345629,0.00002998965,7.1717886e-7,0.0002254187,0.0000037018729,0.00012260926,0.9944059,0.00011632677,0.00011306315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063971005,0.00016898368,0.29722837,0.00026328437,0.0001075416,0.000024254374,0.005972872,0.000011442785,0.0003337775,0.3103115,0.3848169,0.00012135419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011178966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032238453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6840944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028370037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029539142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99924564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751879004","doi":"","title":"Droit constitutionnel canadien : principes fondamentaux","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.02691774587964198,"score_gpt":0.26748510183164226,"score_spread":0.24056735595200027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751879004","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040915944,0.0045496346,0.002096182,0.08570053,0.0037775838,0.00022094091,0.000086543536,0.00008066604,0.86257195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89973825,0.0015853653,0.00014867322,0.00081664626,0.0008174106,0.00001713591,7.967906e-7,0.000004059726,0.096871644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849975,0.00007408146,0.00023512093,0.00028153462,0.00035042214,0.00055909186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992675,0.00016233814,0.00006594728,0.00010659056,0.00014420073,0.0002533893],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026593305,0.00015029356,0.00018855656,0.000039575236,0.0011026048,0.000029798746,0.00020405122,0.00010835997,0.0051996405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016832683,0.00010760361,0.00010037656,0.00026567563,0.004589377,0.0003356447,0.00008849218,0.00004416647,0.0018491554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050434273,0.000048864502,0.0069677304,0.0000031592135,0.00006733398,0.000018725019,0.0006280295,7.048814e-7,0.000036216486,0.9389604,0.0070931395,0.046170685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028541684,0.000037882895,0.003195389,0.00012385185,0.000040964813,0.0000083965315,0.002076375,0.0000013260901,0.00007741021,0.1748655,0.81906635,0.00022114502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15575676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21470475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85882235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090030703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009656684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752015618","doi":"10.1080/07329113.2017.1371476","title":"Human rights encounter legal pluralism. Normative and empirical approaches, edited by Giselle Corradi, Eva Brems and Mark Goodale","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Pluralism (philosophy); Legal pluralism; Sociology; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Legal research; Legal realism","score_opus":0.03822617743444392,"score_gpt":0.3002624874961289,"score_spread":0.262036310061685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752015618","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8916597,0.0021715763,0.000019813762,0.021669194,0.00091057474,0.00025080115,0.00008513585,0.000018176448,0.08321505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99645555,0.00021164879,0.000021664895,0.0005364154,0.0019443778,0.0000016193334,0.0000038682133,0.000006981219,0.0008178573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832016,0.00025598038,0.00040449982,0.00016685815,0.0005296635,0.00032283584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888617,0.00016850088,0.00043798835,0.00013104791,0.0001708824,0.00020540161],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009759875,0.00020651106,0.0003882004,0.00004380127,0.006300764,0.0005316057,0.0003655475,0.00012381,0.000022003747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000679208,0.00013068032,0.00007529979,0.00006678206,0.0037568915,0.0010561165,0.00015676093,0.0003858807,0.0000023699397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044125877,0.00015314888,0.0016162449,0.000012898058,0.00023638278,0.000056343117,0.01681421,0.0000041792273,0.00031142336,0.92445,0.0550372,0.0008667308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014139997,0.0003231614,0.008666981,0.00011679349,0.0002556134,0.00016192286,0.0035656455,0.00003755039,0.000093725146,0.018832147,0.96610266,0.00042980892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040009074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018441657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91106546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004740227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008911354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752396609","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4997298","title":"Constituent Power: Political Unity and Constitutional Plurality","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Power (physics); Political science; Law; Philosophy; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.016560237319367857,"score_gpt":0.3065583401623904,"score_spread":0.2899981028430226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752396609","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21471553,0.060484823,0.034120247,0.0868337,0.0038567255,0.00047268937,0.00007593402,0.00041818141,0.59902215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99575496,0.0030202453,0.000018302775,0.00027726937,0.0005360197,0.000002994869,0.0000015356879,0.0000028571615,0.0003858302],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975052,0.00013576013,0.00018604723,0.00016925453,0.00038840395,0.0016153204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994612,0.00015744552,0.000025914014,0.000042045383,0.000112772184,0.00020065311],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016973747,0.00010500471,0.00013253397,0.00006754139,0.0014225144,0.00016438711,0.000116201,0.00007070468,0.00010841161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025601266,0.0000887711,0.00007954236,0.00018108812,0.0065212534,0.00023526992,0.00004311268,0.0010201905,0.00005530248],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009069132,0.000020105048,0.002391158,0.0000021646308,0.00010072836,0.000014571066,0.0002493059,5.9901106e-7,0.000007955995,0.9955631,0.00017268451,0.0014685555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012113448,0.000040519917,0.0005380727,0.00003064991,0.000032181495,0.00027375127,0.005729195,0.000003191551,0.000002752155,0.89043087,0.10268279,0.00011490872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015191362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025175924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7810394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011371489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009172843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753756812","doi":"10.1017/9781316780237.004","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada’s Transnational Judicial Communication on Human Rights (1982–2014)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Human rights","score_opus":0.04159506145850386,"score_gpt":0.252521625251874,"score_spread":0.21092656379337013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2753756812","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016154964,0.00011368841,0.0000065469826,0.001340022,0.000274945,0.0002861681,0.00035967465,0.000022044842,0.99743533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30811554,0.000073643685,0.0000029244236,0.000031888245,0.00014911586,7.32609e-7,0.000032820008,0.00000605606,0.69158727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986296,0.00008592568,0.00017287908,0.00020360242,0.0006977314,0.00021024822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861,0.00021776909,0.00031613224,0.0003763242,0.0003910663,0.00008867373],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026933526,0.00017147303,0.00024664964,0.000045920144,0.0072584683,0.00003958968,0.00094155566,0.00017366672,0.000008716301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015933041,0.00015983988,0.00012588908,0.0000033866336,0.0021904046,0.000056577068,0.00011718339,0.00028695638,0.0000016429216],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040506096,0.0000064518167,0.0000026023154,0.0000034070447,0.00011011484,0.0000090807325,0.000146147,0.0000012639817,0.0000020054963,0.92443305,0.0751514,0.00009399394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020244016,0.000018588771,0.00022819127,0.00006047338,0.00008629639,3.141102e-7,0.00008153737,0.0000010548644,0.00002097455,0.003945875,0.9951806,0.0001736256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6208077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8069274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92048717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000433109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011873001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99403393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755083658","doi":"","title":"Theories of law and the constitutional law of the British Empire: an address read by invitation before the Canadian [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books  | UK Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitutional law; Political science; Empire","score_opus":0.014510166711004727,"score_gpt":0.2589852684635834,"score_spread":0.24447510175257867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755083658","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032117058,0.0007398099,0.000005286675,0.006726298,0.00023631554,0.00036102073,0.00045364985,0.000008773857,0.9593518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99776953,0.00023402712,0.000010625429,0.0011489346,0.0001208754,0.00002354213,0.0000050845088,0.0000031490972,0.00068424514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988042,0.0002198466,0.0002585345,0.0001310566,0.00040350697,0.00018281666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906886,0.0003411743,0.00016492014,0.00015018236,0.00020875334,0.00006614332],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062041567,0.00008615622,0.0001834857,0.000008859904,0.0021501486,0.000046389974,0.00031710445,0.00007049174,0.00003635194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018082382,0.00004346726,0.00006526546,0.00007032575,0.02310609,0.00015316792,0.000060949184,0.000069227186,8.255735e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015078212,0.000010586522,0.00356488,0.0000041792755,0.000029966615,4.830609e-7,0.003000804,2.4782756e-7,0.000008936667,0.991795,0.000523278,0.0010465364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041374832,0.00002905062,0.0060554445,0.00011174785,0.000049663868,0.0000027026936,0.0011186395,1.6787793e-7,0.00007467962,0.6996252,0.29243374,0.00008521226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8553947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9819331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96565247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043320917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038947174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2756138641","doi":"10.1017/s0008423917000981","title":"“You Can't Always Get What You Want”: Regime Politics, the Supreme Court of Canada, and the Harper Government","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Lawmaking; Politics; Political science; Charter; Government (linguistics); Law; Divided government; Salience (neuroscience); Public administration; Law and economics; Legislature; Economics","score_opus":0.020742754642740606,"score_gpt":0.2570803203801835,"score_spread":0.2363375657374429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2756138641","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46328732,0.0011917187,0.000013554328,0.47879872,0.0017789189,0.0001904045,0.000115943614,0.0000021026142,0.054621305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968866,0.00010547679,0.0000135948685,0.0020813565,0.00043535838,0.0000011096598,6.1438705e-8,0.0000023981886,0.0004740185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974469,0.00008786368,0.00026211748,0.00012532531,0.001162047,0.00091573014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99770904,0.00024120195,0.00020012929,0.00021833637,0.00040453364,0.0012267396],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021704382,0.00008866914,0.00019715184,0.000026439104,0.004925373,0.00047672438,0.0011447588,0.000032543503,0.000050744144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035761897,0.000049423346,0.000058938647,0.00009319777,0.017396983,0.0004069827,0.00007962208,0.00018271287,8.4884533e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037074585,0.0000029244036,0.007057249,0.0000012063913,0.000012807707,0.000017734657,0.0015394951,9.521146e-7,0.0000061219694,0.98961866,0.0014656886,0.0002734542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000775136,0.000075831995,0.6031112,0.00021002871,0.00010757898,0.000089224224,0.052358083,0.000034657587,0.0002897247,0.22935788,0.11328916,0.00030146475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98980206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9931884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76026076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010468775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0149314515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2758441667","doi":"","title":"Parliamentary Timing and Federal Legislation Referred to Courts: Reconsidering C-14","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Legislation; Referral; Law; Legislature; Political science; Supreme court; Judicial review; Referendum; Public administration; Medicine; Family medicine; Politics","score_opus":0.1240364887272668,"score_gpt":0.3389698693085417,"score_spread":0.21493338058127492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2758441667","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15085058,0.20697416,0.00004040377,0.31788686,0.002915164,0.0034354823,0.00021460206,0.00013204983,0.3175507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8875112,0.08084267,0.00049316935,0.02984395,0.000580286,0.00009902758,0.000026799644,0.000014924616,0.0005879541],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879974,0.00007562246,0.00023545246,0.0002776139,0.00020643072,0.0004051265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990202,0.000037194208,0.000106544736,0.00022534883,0.000060417256,0.0005503013],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049733196,0.00013769987,0.00027206523,0.000043868968,0.0033441838,0.00022996304,0.00022320838,0.000041874842,0.00038533367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022305262,0.00014410855,0.000052681724,0.000054178894,0.00030067368,0.00041161763,0.000062326806,0.000096087984,0.00008741357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013230634,0.000021265154,0.085472316,0.00022073677,0.00017835089,0.00012094254,0.002894424,0.0000027235358,0.000014206574,0.008789724,0.25905812,0.643214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000130973,0.000019230927,0.01231321,0.0017219043,0.000050829345,0.000005371901,0.00120801,0.0000017282565,0.000003050379,0.0015923536,0.98270917,0.0002441823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6999312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92785764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73666066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043278252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047445364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99795336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761510710","doi":"","title":"Constitutional reform: Canadian charter of rights and freedoms","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Charter; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.014001653231869235,"score_gpt":0.2257169929931955,"score_spread":0.21171533976132628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761510710","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032280132,0.00033101664,0.00000564622,0.003344448,0.00030619887,0.00016031122,0.00036318536,0.0000094324405,0.9631996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958835,0.00037702493,0.00006223483,0.00019969599,0.00023197895,0.00000993172,0.0000038623234,0.0000026321711,0.003229088],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989663,0.000034319874,0.00022484266,0.0001556148,0.00024285213,0.0003761016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900013,0.000057511534,0.00006872417,0.00009756223,0.00015173097,0.0006243436],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020144615,0.00009852183,0.0001945394,0.00024889974,0.0005046652,0.000008424502,0.00015089297,0.00009471819,0.00032128303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000791743,0.000072564144,0.000046594567,0.00016157166,0.0031205884,0.00014385606,0.000014073856,0.000046128967,0.000020355217],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033012286,0.0000036574224,0.0075559444,0.0000024781828,0.000022499056,0.000008542758,0.00048622373,4.722047e-8,0.00000958299,0.986657,0.0028204385,0.0024302758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018644892,0.000019030818,0.020421252,0.000056480978,0.000015008339,0.0000022356394,0.00017346283,8.953241e-8,0.000015564368,0.03954184,0.939442,0.00012661138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9969471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96360344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034297886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024145506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761761837","doi":"","title":"The prerogative power in the Australian and Canadian constitutions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Australian Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Power (physics); Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03128897012955045,"score_gpt":0.2930506964353844,"score_spread":0.26176172630583394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761761837","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041498814,0.00011815197,0.000001222941,0.039949592,0.00024822605,0.00038320792,0.00008315179,0.000013975408,0.9177036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99005014,0.0003647355,0.000016141275,0.00021822557,0.00008987694,0.000031319865,8.4177975e-7,0.0000026980267,0.009226049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884117,0.00015434876,0.00021006755,0.00015173158,0.00025137336,0.0003913373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992511,0.00035605152,0.00006117392,0.0001283895,0.00006690035,0.00013638129],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051598693,0.000102240265,0.00012007764,0.00003547059,0.001214065,0.000042970973,0.00028232936,0.000072238974,0.0000742579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016623981,0.000052531617,0.000043390795,0.000117297895,0.0041024457,0.00015179563,0.00002358792,0.00010176322,0.000020775045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003968266,0.000008737054,0.009947809,9.325046e-7,0.000016223028,0.000007300319,0.003307421,1.5454778e-7,0.000004109323,0.98272914,0.0032394847,0.00073473284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014218246,0.0000216586,0.057302713,0.000042159798,0.000015477304,0.0000021055153,0.0041856566,9.454298e-9,0.000008145224,0.049744558,0.88844025,0.000095068455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5267159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9485513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098710676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042071898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762692600","doi":"","title":"The Canadian constitution and the courts: the function and scope of judicial review","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Scope (computer science); Law; Political science; Function (biology); Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.013824193743637216,"score_gpt":0.2343405926416996,"score_spread":0.22051639889806238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762692600","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021744994,0.05271115,0.0000043648083,0.06219532,0.0004519723,0.00068651146,0.00006565621,0.0000065895874,0.8817039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87703645,0.1203597,0.0000033606434,0.0015214424,0.00022384665,0.000030477726,9.1588623e-7,0.0000027409794,0.00082109094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989926,0.00016891917,0.00022418122,0.00011355541,0.0002438511,0.0002568434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990056,0.000407349,0.000110294415,0.00012008494,0.0001546048,0.00020204397],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011629534,0.00008227007,0.00017308717,0.00006130049,0.0021909862,0.000026943575,0.00016481224,0.000051125626,0.00003133166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006389121,0.00003649331,0.00004053738,0.00015735453,0.005165777,0.00008001846,0.00002061953,0.00006875365,0.000003833154],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011318494,0.0000010256476,0.0018873212,0.000008382499,0.000024255422,6.9949135e-7,0.00023794062,4.622704e-8,7.3135607e-7,0.96856767,0.009442294,0.019818334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020789033,0.000013540423,0.01470417,0.00023638361,0.000072070325,0.0000015796313,0.00024360725,1.216679e-7,6.977635e-7,0.033800386,0.9506578,0.00006176489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9846474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99938565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9412155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011405645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025476923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763979294","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv6cfpf3","title":"Law, Politics and the Judicial Process in Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law; Process (computing); Computer science","score_opus":0.018266559134448596,"score_gpt":0.2019408789088179,"score_spread":0.1836743197743693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763979294","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024800492,0.0006908221,0.0000037256482,0.00015155971,0.00009150224,0.00023470874,0.000025487469,0.000007939784,0.99854624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15163203,0.00089386315,0.0000148130675,0.00042447707,0.00022892024,0.0000010209845,0.000006374428,0.000009594811,0.8467889],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914515,0.00007923247,0.00010153915,0.00013516124,0.00035817456,0.00018071552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995449,0.000144527,0.0000946426,0.00006763685,0.000089493886,0.000058786787],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010777237,0.00009733132,0.00025857813,0.000024328727,0.0005583962,0.0000080091095,0.00025086614,0.00009961544,0.000021418868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017507802,0.00009177362,0.000041458236,0.000010843605,0.0027228363,0.000028140219,0.0000991053,0.0001941923,5.093913e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002775919,0.0000033455296,0.000030697232,0.000016548709,0.000032435637,0.000029236375,0.004258414,0.0000012549823,1.5656463e-8,0.99362135,0.0014052006,0.0005737368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006752687,0.000007256156,0.00008023401,0.00011917538,0.000088496636,7.3098704e-7,0.001843453,0.000016524133,8.691181e-7,0.08564541,0.91136175,0.00016082152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.995131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9099566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000337912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023988083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2764075896","doi":"","title":"Judgments of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.015565338364391062,"score_gpt":0.21943433429358822,"score_spread":0.20386899592919716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2764075896","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.108913705,0.00016703922,0.0000011090101,0.004680125,0.0004487079,0.00015416303,0.00020885382,0.000003028512,0.88542324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991768,0.00023909463,0.000013015057,0.00015844556,0.00008361349,0.000004429303,4.1255163e-7,0.000003148371,0.0077298256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989869,0.00004642748,0.00022053401,0.00008667042,0.00041549382,0.00024396583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993611,0.00009132692,0.000120658755,0.00012399866,0.00014435044,0.00015855362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017214882,0.00006339449,0.00016025915,0.000060523078,0.00022090462,0.0000018697148,0.00028238437,0.000038692717,0.00014120982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021294574,0.000040730305,0.000052004387,0.00017454881,0.00059417094,0.000042648444,0.000027019501,0.00003064981,0.0000011209028],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009726006,0.000016764034,0.16916023,0.000013902307,0.00007770271,0.0000037402865,0.0012901938,0.0000016840343,0.00014633038,0.75604504,0.06845677,0.0047778944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012376484,0.000010489423,0.10456186,0.000068106776,0.000016809805,1.7685267e-7,0.0003757507,5.991178e-8,0.00022810309,0.005989782,0.88854957,0.00007552887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9986124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99989843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88285434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020069478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005559978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9863162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2764092000","doi":"10.1093/icon/moz060","title":"Judging constitutional conventions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Law; Constitutional law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.022608736415300926,"score_gpt":0.3207430179377241,"score_spread":0.29813428152242316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2764092000","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0216652,0.0008138437,0.013083422,0.0114830285,0.012024042,0.00023704195,0.00010030299,0.000053294843,0.94053984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956822,0.00015918342,0.0007218649,0.0013670279,0.0014914448,0.0000040336345,0.000014480076,0.0000033288877,0.0005564376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99733824,0.00010548048,0.0006028089,0.00016611563,0.0015317731,0.00025556624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99709725,0.00029622277,0.0003827038,0.000080486236,0.0019793527,0.00016397808],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080244185,0.00013852377,0.00025299803,0.00021155794,0.00057874154,0.00013526292,0.00058175763,0.00009253302,0.0022941704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031701097,0.00013287827,0.00029402866,0.00017500209,0.0075395624,0.00081638026,0.00007810962,0.00026578305,0.0004817287],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006993285,0.00010863305,0.009634994,0.0000018176227,0.0002796035,0.00006388393,0.0001575425,0.00032163676,0.00019547978,0.98775935,0.0010674249,0.00033968262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009735489,0.00003567658,0.0010501737,0.00014852289,0.000039060356,0.00022785147,0.0005492605,0.000009703718,0.00009119553,0.13120742,0.86548257,0.00018502338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038943274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014664324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.974017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035884994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020928853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765264661","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0011","title":"Courts, Administrative Agencies, and the Constitution","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Statute; Political science; Law; Separation of powers; Constitutional law; Administrative law; Supreme court; Judicial independence; Judicial review; Subject (documents)","score_opus":0.07101320562738322,"score_gpt":0.2701858908716735,"score_spread":0.19917268524429027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765264661","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001541769,0.0005171467,0.00004650291,0.00037659,0.00023235497,0.0003783579,0.00010039533,0.000039262457,0.998294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03453697,0.0034719,0.000017754212,0.00006499998,0.00020468258,0.0000010494342,0.0000057808375,0.0000036633003,0.9616932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920356,0.000053882755,0.00008734166,0.00021522568,0.00027602888,0.00016396039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992837,0.00013324452,0.00019992991,0.00016720076,0.00013627009,0.00007967873],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023133341,0.00015836424,0.00023998063,0.00002831236,0.0036190872,0.00009721795,0.00033765423,0.00018895631,0.000025217636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004972773,0.00013096293,0.00009911901,0.0000019329993,0.009458866,0.00008955715,0.00020442443,0.00022230003,0.00000108955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000092471426,0.000001711501,0.0000027066421,0.0000039827623,0.00010458002,0.000038605824,0.0016352199,1.18130856e-7,1.1506602e-7,0.9943354,0.0012966009,0.0024884467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003946817,0.000012799494,0.0000118294365,0.00006152624,0.00015932113,0.0000020057207,0.0008491468,8.9211386e-7,0.0000010263368,0.045052703,0.9533,0.00015405199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033823699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030707603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9520034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013677675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006710665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99767804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765467927","doi":"","title":"Constitutional politics in Canada after the Charter: liberalism, communitarianism, and systemism","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Communitarianism; Liberalism; Charter; Political science; Politics; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0123894464053049,"score_gpt":0.20857585433627437,"score_spread":0.19618640793096948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765467927","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26042357,0.0010949385,0.0000027246574,0.017558716,0.00042106476,0.0002998959,0.00043577794,0.000009589849,0.71975374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960888,0.0006085056,0.0000105319705,0.001166515,0.0001606184,0.000030847114,0.0000021572614,0.0000028673423,0.0019291603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989708,0.00011449751,0.00021352633,0.000108022316,0.000245672,0.00034748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929756,0.00022687437,0.000045894365,0.00011853607,0.00007079153,0.00024037415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022256865,0.000091603884,0.00015678197,0.000073389485,0.00045016847,0.000015059312,0.00018530537,0.00004794861,0.00009134092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000085589374,0.000061629515,0.000023966426,0.00011699936,0.0013980852,0.00008604528,0.000031143874,0.00007850199,0.000004338856],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033174324,0.00000262565,0.056731552,0.0000041539015,0.000013054089,0.000017660142,0.0010479573,1.9736675e-7,0.0000011550687,0.9397792,0.001719176,0.00067995663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017942773,0.000005780469,0.06991279,0.000088327164,0.000010451759,0.0000045184092,0.0014773118,2.155034e-7,0.0000020782095,0.008221354,0.9199701,0.00012767786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9996737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93155783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059233484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056589846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765921322","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0019","title":"Key Doctrines in Canadian Legal Federalism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Legislature; Federalism; Constitution; Jurisdiction; Jurisprudence; Law; Parliament; Separation of powers; Supreme court; Enumerated powers; Politics","score_opus":0.03595536130004879,"score_gpt":0.24553318407754943,"score_spread":0.20957782277750064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765921322","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009696318,0.00012606323,0.0000011890903,0.0005472705,0.00034777808,0.00021993414,0.00009006713,0.000035183417,0.9985356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.040683694,0.000637777,0.00001072049,0.000084456035,0.00028205945,5.6438256e-7,0.000008658765,0.000007635756,0.95828444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989657,0.000026228907,0.00009741416,0.0002573372,0.00025437,0.0003989412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993458,0.00002842952,0.00010427299,0.00017266793,0.00010169608,0.0002471504],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013467393,0.00017796014,0.00025275178,0.00016370286,0.0019535106,0.00011951658,0.00051732967,0.00028604706,0.00005413073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002394736,0.00021129087,0.000110227375,0.000004331948,0.00080928364,0.00014030669,0.00014172548,0.0002700486,0.0000034043494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014424038,0.0000020624204,0.00011575497,0.0000036583342,0.000037215952,0.00031269965,0.0006914367,6.170351e-7,1.11048955e-7,0.9953436,0.0016248351,0.0018535834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016696914,0.000007556099,0.000160465,0.00007711288,0.000031121548,8.9461247e-7,0.00013651799,4.7395636e-7,5.246814e-7,0.009437113,0.98974013,0.00024110057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93991834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.982998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9881153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005639221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013002196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99934584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766403759","doi":"","title":"Canadian constitutional law: cases, notes and materials on the distribution and limitation of legislative powers under [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Calculus (dental); Medicine","score_opus":0.02841954796743159,"score_gpt":0.24763483832405941,"score_spread":0.21921529035662782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766403759","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31824797,0.00036058982,0.000042529424,0.026891768,0.00029245458,0.00046515244,0.0031152328,0.000011250759,0.650573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99862385,0.00053983234,0.000013726473,0.00038278126,0.00007921381,0.000010403213,0.000020851801,0.000002439848,0.00032687502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992331,0.00008554582,0.00016216612,0.00012632036,0.00017518565,0.00021766649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895513,0.0005633549,0.00007405053,0.000058677535,0.00012097695,0.00022779898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002681061,0.00008383631,0.00013294975,0.00009399163,0.0005915548,0.000018462964,0.00006460977,0.00006509899,0.000058313137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043939112,0.00005699963,0.000019883482,0.00009661321,0.0024870513,0.00010892912,0.000010242849,0.000033153807,0.000004013486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066031566,0.000002773396,0.0021943687,0.0000019550791,0.000018863795,0.0000033868369,0.0004957827,4.2353184e-7,0.000029795996,0.99592966,0.0007500989,0.00056630676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036092018,0.0000959025,0.07910865,0.00018305054,0.00005662347,0.000006508535,0.0018737878,2.7615198e-7,0.00025680792,0.119746685,0.79802644,0.0002843496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98056835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99590236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.876183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023054561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013939395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91636443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766830284","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0049","title":"Understanding Dialogue Theory","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legislature; Political science; Remedial education; Process (computing); Law; Epistemology; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14240856484932252,"score_gpt":0.2609634641294184,"score_spread":0.11855489928009588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766830284","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000023496914,0.00011830031,0.0007889669,0.000093898045,0.00044000513,0.00020043847,0.000080727325,0.00008958618,0.99818575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017264964,0.0010871122,0.000015127431,0.000040738563,0.0003701992,3.3208696e-7,0.000007927425,0.000010890354,0.9812027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990554,0.000051444225,0.000081935475,0.0002535482,0.0003128892,0.00024480044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930674,0.00012963376,0.00017270377,0.0002110572,0.00007162552,0.00010821977],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024158088,0.000177199,0.000240538,0.0000696411,0.003010006,0.00007498383,0.000516033,0.00028394038,0.000070840375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034897617,0.00019872731,0.00016444558,0.000002370172,0.0019447978,0.00010062959,0.0002660134,0.00024496074,0.0000035201651],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039786897,0.000002761696,0.0000055305345,0.0000046977225,0.0001206748,0.00006584413,0.0009958415,3.464809e-7,2.445785e-7,0.99579096,0.0015541835,0.0014191149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000100116114,0.000008167988,0.0000034602585,0.00006329936,0.00008659106,3.162727e-7,0.00044555636,1.4899759e-7,5.135786e-7,0.30175298,0.6973723,0.00016649718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014340989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028471227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6958181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044640226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028599743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767571406","doi":"10.1111/jels.12161","title":"Triaging the Law: Developing the Common Law on the Supreme Court of India","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisdiction; Political science; Precedent; Original jurisdiction; Majority opinion; Supreme Court Decisions; Law of the case; Court of equity; Common law; Salience (neuroscience); Concurring opinion; Court of record; Citation; Psychology","score_opus":0.18992218102264155,"score_gpt":0.42942458305424364,"score_spread":0.23950240203160209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767571406","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2466452,0.006396515,0.000017185626,0.55929327,0.0013664005,0.00026023854,0.000005413191,0.000009820788,0.18600594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931088,0.0011255381,0.000020214522,0.004786767,0.00086960156,0.000004886336,4.700402e-8,0.0000035448227,0.00008059612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981296,0.00034268852,0.00042938674,0.000085994296,0.00077718566,0.00023515148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966129,0.002149186,0.00060696626,0.000181269,0.00041228696,0.00003741199],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025766918,0.000115639225,0.00035506077,0.000017068875,0.0074689277,0.00018026456,0.00090493145,0.0000399238,0.000008375295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015176149,0.000044551703,0.0001968642,0.00010247901,0.004102625,0.00020888392,0.00024797316,0.00040421446,0.0000058452174],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053796524,0.000030970452,0.007544211,0.0000026749753,0.00033159013,0.000009858178,0.008106343,0.000004851345,0.000004798927,0.9738088,0.009506585,0.00059551833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037073667,0.00014515844,0.066985,0.00023776873,0.00013922254,0.000008179102,0.027119739,0.0000012927692,0.00013663572,0.14353395,0.7611781,0.0001442254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031126514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007775206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8302749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011045532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018823704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99860764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767876364","doi":"10.22609/2.1.2","title":"A Theory of Judicial Constitutional Design","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Constitutional theory; Law; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.07302848898577642,"score_gpt":0.37847590309569507,"score_spread":0.30544741410991866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767876364","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031875487,0.00075859105,0.21425353,0.0154706985,0.0072185122,0.0002013933,0.00009224113,0.00002461674,0.7301049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965848,0.00006087213,0.000636693,0.00041646906,0.002134307,0.0000014801545,4.8321925e-7,0.0000030220515,0.00016187057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801344,0.00037732953,0.00041236085,0.00008444477,0.0008700014,0.00024240793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971299,0.0011068439,0.00042561142,0.00009605683,0.0010802725,0.00016129161],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026673404,0.00008300455,0.00021474336,0.00010821729,0.0005763156,0.000078813784,0.0008900071,0.00006986213,0.00045504436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006569156,0.000069322734,0.00019312734,0.000027759774,0.0071993503,0.00031243032,0.00010616698,0.00016508119,0.000022829925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036152446,0.00009675801,0.0012073264,9.939345e-7,0.00023632476,0.000053531432,0.0003585273,0.0000061387996,0.00008413414,0.994062,0.00022386154,0.0033088645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004029342,0.000049778853,0.0061922404,0.00007780585,0.000042718777,0.00003161622,0.0011717259,0.0000013729857,0.0003882528,0.9847203,0.006847252,0.000073990974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026596364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001677548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96470934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014588721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009775038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769900079","doi":"","title":"Constitutional litigation in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.015026791794034853,"score_gpt":0.2214546581736937,"score_spread":0.20642786637965885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769900079","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060592666,0.00016882153,0.000008472035,0.005270405,0.00037485166,0.00012900498,0.000120711775,0.000007166612,0.9333279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997522,0.00042648462,0.000033009117,0.0003173488,0.00016057062,0.000013312816,0.0000030557246,0.0000017168509,0.001522524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990755,0.000044279197,0.00019032328,0.00011781101,0.00028047877,0.00029161357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994537,0.00012299942,0.00004526605,0.000058629783,0.00008299864,0.0002363927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001579032,0.00006467983,0.00011864897,0.00011638901,0.00022096696,0.0000052261817,0.00011877997,0.000038979237,0.00026494605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023134916,0.00005448355,0.000023605553,0.0002214011,0.0007546495,0.00010600538,0.0000096128015,0.000039292885,0.000013203644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020076222,0.0000023809293,0.10927947,0.0000011681879,0.0000050181275,0.000012110807,0.00016198991,0.000001216307,0.0000035095838,0.88048667,0.0030684518,0.0069760145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013449759,0.0000038453672,0.0981447,0.000043721913,0.0000033625047,5.289542e-7,0.00033322503,1.4724249e-7,0.00000799188,0.0149015775,0.8863323,0.000094103656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9369293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011586479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014248095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9913402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770691897","doi":"10.1017/cls.2017.24","title":"Litigating Parentage: Equality Rights, LGBTQ Mobilization and Ontario’s All Families Are Equal Act","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Legislature; Law; Gay rights; Opposition (politics); Lawmaking; Politics","score_opus":0.04021499362328898,"score_gpt":0.3008227465609203,"score_spread":0.2606077529376313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770691897","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9486965,0.0008419039,0.00003938739,0.00397837,0.0006629373,0.00014829665,0.00007794635,0.000008378223,0.04554628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970317,0.00041495217,0.00010752657,0.0014916606,0.0004119139,0.0000039929087,0.000007044214,0.000008003075,0.00052324386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986433,0.00010912188,0.00035269052,0.00021272588,0.0001487342,0.0005334381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99792904,0.0001481094,0.00048333438,0.00014200599,0.00031818778,0.0009793],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012077675,0.00015848705,0.00036752678,0.000030099602,0.0045239194,0.00038924572,0.00027370895,0.00016220531,0.000055896468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029744767,0.00016258344,0.00017335327,0.000046319798,0.0018687972,0.00058582774,0.0000377206,0.00034974166,7.1840356e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004254014,0.000009014851,0.043184847,0.000027118716,0.00015026148,0.000047608308,0.11560209,0.0000045304337,0.0000073737274,0.8395103,0.0005134694,0.00093913253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012396541,0.0001529548,0.1512424,0.00056480686,0.0002768538,0.00007204777,0.1670693,0.000022020831,0.000013871154,0.26773682,0.41082066,0.00078860024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9525737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57177347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009999925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015927438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99677205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770753393","doi":"","title":"L'équilibre des pouvoirs législatif et juridictionnel à l'épreuve des systèmes de protection des droits et libertés : étude comparée : États-Unis, Canada, Royaume-Uni","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.04424579164467234,"score_gpt":0.3031103968670378,"score_spread":0.25886460522236543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770753393","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7978164,0.005431293,0.0012705341,0.0028484021,0.0019777822,0.0012440257,0.00017406471,0.00026302034,0.1889745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736249,0.0029466508,0.00092235167,0.00032366576,0.0005601299,0.00036015836,0.0002401916,0.00006760825,0.020954346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99464095,0.00097483996,0.00089091173,0.0009317833,0.0012686017,0.0012928896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99670017,0.00047098298,0.00078044273,0.00040038308,0.0011335736,0.000514475],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012583084,0.0008908117,0.0009892869,0.00020162514,0.013157628,0.0006200738,0.0008915588,0.0007383708,0.00037472378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010488497,0.000884857,0.00035953562,0.00065011234,0.0048090382,0.0013888036,0.0001461153,0.000960993,0.0000687804],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000438799,0.0007591587,0.056619115,0.0012595287,0.0018609856,0.0001051593,0.17774457,0.0035453276,0.00084304414,0.6949224,0.0049251746,0.05697673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076794205,0.0002716988,0.647568,0.0030105738,0.00066927157,0.000044871864,0.06013296,0.000853083,0.0008193791,0.26578274,0.018291108,0.0017883615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9729608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99698424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5909489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028411727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008409174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2772139495","doi":"10.1017/cls.2017.25","title":"Criminal Justice Policy during the Harper Era: Private Member’s Bills, Penal Populism, and the Criminal Code of Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Legislation; Parliament; Criminal justice; Political science; Economic Justice; Law; Government (linguistics); Criminal code; Criminal law; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.028120670500425805,"score_gpt":0.2844385929035023,"score_spread":0.2563179224030765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2772139495","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9327734,0.001517948,0.000005463226,0.03824222,0.0006659823,0.00017295804,0.0001503219,0.0000028088252,0.026468866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99406964,0.0010253121,0.000043728767,0.003261727,0.00094181515,0.000004294893,9.3908363e-7,0.000010334074,0.00064220704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984399,0.00013942985,0.00038241874,0.0001707659,0.00023483606,0.00063262705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99790764,0.00027844164,0.00046995908,0.00020068418,0.00038177473,0.0007614753],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013498685,0.00016683362,0.0003976787,0.000029604678,0.008183626,0.00022687686,0.00058706134,0.00009527378,0.000032544314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008500542,0.00011804737,0.00019521416,0.000081750506,0.004376293,0.00026331964,0.00006498555,0.00045641972,1.8167228e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022679185,0.0000039721494,0.0005915185,0.00006611185,0.0001438347,0.000057455873,0.05645092,0.000008799128,0.000009009493,0.9415517,0.000800161,0.00029387441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004946303,0.00015391565,0.17674251,0.00067602476,0.0025489982,0.0009256897,0.42243516,0.000071273804,0.000040548926,0.100108646,0.2902794,0.0010715462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98729324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99881893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.841443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007452852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061609596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2772588544","doi":"10.32920/22227784","title":"Shouldn’t the bench be a mirror? The diversity of the Canadian judiciary","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Meritocracy; Compromise; Diversity (politics); Objectivity (philosophy); Political science; Population; Economic Justice; Composition (language); Public administration; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08403152688698305,"score_gpt":0.3017344156809138,"score_spread":0.21770288879393074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2772588544","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18348245,0.000116797535,8.6723253e-7,0.23968518,0.00050294254,0.00024193157,0.000024851566,0.000033498345,0.57591146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99487966,0.000060711784,0.0000014594642,0.0034562333,0.000066394714,0.0000051030197,5.4957883e-7,0.0000011672431,0.0015287183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991248,0.00010664251,0.000067609,0.00007649275,0.00040933286,0.00021511405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956596,0.00017585079,0.000026938233,0.000116093666,0.00006915107,0.000046014207],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006206938,0.00004447392,0.000058748963,0.000018247727,0.0071472023,0.000019933372,0.0005353489,0.000035372643,0.00022431898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015169867,0.000018991113,0.00007257751,0.0006019871,0.0014663382,0.000036238816,0.00031962505,0.00009430706,0.000041581334],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015384244,0.000005845895,0.100239456,5.408874e-7,0.00003683795,0.0000014420161,0.014231024,0.000003443845,0.0000038880594,0.81798023,0.067000486,0.0004952353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003811049,0.000004479387,0.7073524,0.000004590762,0.000026185971,1.79161e-7,0.023578135,0.000006229068,0.000008896135,0.0651884,0.20373787,0.00005452733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9784298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99620265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8113972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007787676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051687536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99414533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2772796020","doi":"","title":"Constitutional remedies in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.017243281213787265,"score_gpt":0.22483695517957958,"score_spread":0.2075936739657923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2772796020","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02982978,0.0003681022,0.000004641098,0.007109263,0.0005305268,0.00012742748,0.000118220894,0.0000085044885,0.9619035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99577135,0.0011067534,0.00003978383,0.00038315624,0.00020105655,0.0000141004475,0.0000017970916,0.000002132914,0.0024798887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989064,0.000044686592,0.00021366343,0.00013550377,0.00033267317,0.00036711668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936223,0.00015924344,0.000047743833,0.00007208269,0.000090094385,0.00026859972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018225267,0.00007967877,0.00015840962,0.00013699858,0.00026090338,0.000005001514,0.00016226334,0.00004173907,0.00028456844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034242554,0.00006406932,0.000028702825,0.0002310066,0.0011571711,0.0000962354,0.000015983756,0.000048016907,0.000013916028],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032214068,0.0000028621835,0.12987396,0.000001545273,0.000008809475,0.000027168346,0.00020850873,8.289477e-7,0.0000034892398,0.8547701,0.009034444,0.00606501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001357367,0.0000042252036,0.0654713,0.0000484016,0.0000040432255,6.8836795e-7,0.0004959128,6.893094e-8,0.000005818324,0.009436535,0.92429256,0.000104703395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96594155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010967043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015555181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9900257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2774456419","doi":"","title":"Report of proceedings of the preliminary conference and first meeting of the Canadian Bar Association: held at Montreal, September [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Bar (unit); Library science; Political science; Gerontology; Medicine; Geography; Psychology; Meteorology; Computer science","score_opus":0.013489358996336609,"score_gpt":0.2127400474407237,"score_spread":0.1992506884443871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2774456419","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32113537,0.00014860347,4.6627527e-8,0.0051677446,0.0001244514,0.00022145947,0.000091812646,0.0000027657413,0.67310774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98668087,0.00024042367,0.0000142288745,0.00006620265,0.000070017144,0.0000109377215,4.6591794e-7,0.0000044181343,0.012912411],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879944,0.000030024023,0.00035290176,0.00014149427,0.00041647773,0.00025966266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863285,0.00015689593,0.00046235483,0.000104767765,0.00045914372,0.00018398146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046216208,0.000088818095,0.00022245577,0.000074624986,0.00059797853,0.000007373984,0.0002489271,0.00010640063,0.000069102265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007904233,0.00005495766,0.00007805014,0.00020364403,0.00077136286,0.0000798541,0.000066164575,0.000055725148,9.161549e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007524703,0.000007345638,0.8966422,0.000030007617,0.00005562552,0.0000028407453,0.0031781709,6.354259e-7,0.00004445619,0.08194842,0.017577419,0.00050533924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012822448,0.000024044475,0.6613636,0.00031020291,0.000059123733,0.0000033895915,0.00070382596,4.3781523e-7,0.00026038682,0.0031920038,0.3338539,0.00010083866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9822118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9993269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6655455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038468797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002028082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45992282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2774874957","doi":"","title":"Bobbitt’s Paradise: Canadian Constitutional Interpretation and Public Meaning Originalism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Constitution; Interpretation (philosophy); Original meaning; Constitutional interpretation; Constitutionalism; Original intent; Meaning (existential); Supreme court; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.05075330785836103,"score_gpt":0.3391241005377399,"score_spread":0.2883707926793789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2774874957","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2899445,0.001409334,0.0005255587,0.09224321,0.0015052042,0.0002782146,0.00026580226,0.000089693924,0.6137385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99830204,0.00019297133,0.00022051009,0.000568768,0.0004342344,0.0000053507238,0.00002987137,0.0000019354507,0.00024429278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993053,0.00003179832,0.0000972539,0.00014412764,0.00018767815,0.00023381431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994725,0.000035454756,0.00006528025,0.00008892568,0.000121971316,0.0002158984],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019645205,0.000067839595,0.00009442235,0.00005301559,0.003156249,0.00022381319,0.00017044373,0.000047411755,0.00009987268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058522564,0.00006556073,0.000024183975,0.000046385387,0.0021767947,0.00035322912,0.00003488654,0.00008032676,0.000023569883],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033197814,0.000012528475,0.025229767,0.0000011885595,0.000016010647,0.000009319786,0.00070382614,0.0000012866502,0.0000029274158,0.96685725,0.0006652239,0.006497365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024079366,0.000013812664,0.05890482,0.000046105957,0.00002226129,0.0000061147675,0.002032607,0.00019490282,0.0000013653342,0.045243703,0.89310205,0.00019146451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32557237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9216135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001219388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087755104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775927082","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Bar Association submission to the Special Joint Committee of the Senate and of the House of Commons on the Constitution","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; House of Commons; Political science; Law; Commons; Association (psychology); Joint (building); Engineering; Parliament; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019262164670656712,"score_gpt":0.2179704769395563,"score_spread":0.19870831226889957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775927082","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2784948,0.00017552327,0.0000010315022,0.1498395,0.00094458257,0.00092088373,0.00039862923,0.0000062094887,0.5692188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974415,0.00028759488,0.0000020717664,0.0005545734,0.000288642,0.000012481051,3.148074e-7,0.000004638111,0.0014082306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838364,0.0003708237,0.00031271507,0.00010860668,0.000532783,0.00029144005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984757,0.00056380674,0.00029074532,0.00028186143,0.00022601146,0.00016190998],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011409489,0.00010086649,0.00017984898,0.00006753377,0.0020546124,0.000019830999,0.0004908391,0.00008526659,0.000026685533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013132812,0.000039246876,0.00010231249,0.000290883,0.0016958717,0.00004169813,0.00006570636,0.00013196861,0.0000037419356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010959909,0.000008613621,0.039683323,0.0000031446257,0.00004502304,3.9169865e-7,0.002951023,0.000004532112,0.000067149114,0.9200978,0.03435793,0.0027700802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000118329524,0.000020500884,0.22574612,0.00011586964,0.00003723312,3.5123384e-7,0.0010562745,4.9809034e-7,0.00033522575,0.007141535,0.76535743,0.000070596914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94253695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9129563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041040906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023187553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2778880036","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3090789","title":"Quantitative Analysis of Judicial Voting","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Vector Institute; Royal Ontario Museum; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03462312152891188,"score_gpt":0.35443439987052006,"score_spread":0.31981127834160816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2778880036","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8797283,0.0028513726,0.006558947,0.004129555,0.00046544397,0.0000891833,0.000007014285,0.000019178902,0.10615099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974936,0.0019248172,0.000044434248,0.000023440534,0.00028132976,9.5328915e-7,5.175772e-7,0.0000024313945,0.0002284269],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834895,0.00008310294,0.0001914031,0.00009575094,0.0003527182,0.0009280875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999225,0.00007937472,0.0003655182,0.00007552652,0.0002100658,0.000044508786],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020619698,0.00006140474,0.00022161403,0.0001276158,0.0031419403,0.00006882423,0.00035421347,0.000038529193,0.000033556804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008105069,0.000054754582,0.00019418102,0.00023601897,0.0006688119,0.00020867448,0.000041055435,0.000422565,0.000007858747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020177637,0.000017810029,0.03631139,2.679413e-7,0.0010692303,9.605185e-7,0.0009985269,0.000020707024,0.000027083033,0.9573994,0.000011191581,0.0041232468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030329695,0.00017441521,0.10020431,0.000021509244,0.0011409532,0.0000030384615,0.027839296,0.00012757232,0.000013780415,0.86799556,0.0019897658,0.00018650967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015530226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15766309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14213288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030061533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018945935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99815583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2779267178","doi":"","title":"Canada's constitutional law in a nutshell","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitutional law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.014320452577195997,"score_gpt":0.22616477906946994,"score_spread":0.21184432649227394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2779267178","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063225143,0.0002557112,0.0000055735422,0.0072430954,0.00036847,0.00015070468,0.0002099689,0.000010216298,0.98543376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99334615,0.00041825094,0.00004038323,0.0011026054,0.00021366509,0.000016391914,0.0000025525733,0.0000032265318,0.0048567406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988307,0.000051934447,0.00021955215,0.00015864971,0.00033629962,0.00040287216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993129,0.00014565355,0.000047597092,0.000085069405,0.00009046333,0.00031833982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019774823,0.00009094021,0.00016703687,0.00015677653,0.00033367294,0.000008217351,0.00018569433,0.000063673484,0.00029137792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001721974,0.000075335054,0.000035967245,0.00023290396,0.0016938249,0.00010021065,0.000017256141,0.00005651893,0.000017507722],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035710398,0.000005650535,0.014966741,0.0000015636349,0.0000080444215,0.000030895753,0.00013401503,7.3157076e-7,0.0000039893375,0.97330385,0.010023617,0.001517341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017569502,0.0000057465522,0.012476539,0.00004489633,0.0000046589366,9.138816e-7,0.00014617076,6.529533e-8,0.000006612935,0.021188164,0.965832,0.000118531716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99982613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98702365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065130525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0115337735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99406993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781079282","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3091717","title":"Past, Present, and Justice in the Exercise of Judicial Responsibility","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Psychology; Criminology","score_opus":0.02676248716564935,"score_gpt":0.3317666565288402,"score_spread":0.30500416936319086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2781079282","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9195999,0.0060010278,0.00009890158,0.024091018,0.00035524435,0.00024730456,0.0000028992476,0.0000069776593,0.049596746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927307,0.006058633,0.000007040221,0.000034268967,0.0010300835,0.000003160387,9.4340194e-8,0.0000017119678,0.00013432844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985149,0.00019753602,0.00015932736,0.00009697724,0.00031451392,0.0007167401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994737,0.00014477008,0.00014790404,0.00012203426,0.00008047111,0.00003115206],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004265044,0.00005580158,0.00012376136,0.000033020617,0.0019386093,0.00006810044,0.00038309876,0.00003892177,0.0000058421133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039346569,0.00003881712,0.00004191308,0.000068051086,0.00088998856,0.00017461726,0.000055746073,0.0005238152,0.0000019263732],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017865698,0.00006627433,0.027203934,0.0000033491488,0.000024824894,0.0000044485796,0.0040942235,0.0000017804512,0.000016207312,0.9426602,0.00024024073,0.025505861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002949055,0.000060056525,0.120539024,0.000027660502,0.00005893641,0.000010961403,0.018458938,0.0000022618212,0.000004448992,0.85424554,0.0062346756,0.000062596526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0086622685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027808184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09333509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013141453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013541722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99936074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781112312","doi":"10.22145/flr.45.4.10","title":"Justiciability, Access to Justice and the Development of Constitutional Law in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Duty; Justiciability; Political science; Government (linguistics); Common law; Context (archaeology); Rule of law; Economic Justice; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.07835296890226545,"score_gpt":0.3644354827945134,"score_spread":0.2860825138922479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2781112312","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012215971,0.022252876,0.00008782124,0.054537244,0.0007074256,0.0012841423,0.00002523118,0.000009212686,0.90888005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99244195,0.0019265753,0.00013305164,0.0053596473,0.00006115832,0.000057750105,7.0374733e-7,9.2704266e-7,0.000018215851],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991007,0.000089731744,0.0002574279,0.00011802351,0.00028463246,0.00014952228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994656,0.00017531858,0.000093275725,0.00010188189,0.00010443875,0.000059506678],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000778285,0.00006452114,0.00024073602,0.0000042945235,0.0025195163,0.00008148461,0.00032757886,0.000014504626,0.000045821565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059308304,0.00004315095,0.000021991393,0.000045058765,0.0022399845,0.00013033501,0.00021514564,0.000056225483,0.0000039125866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007080019,0.0000064631286,0.0021837908,0.0002036035,0.000007987624,0.0000011513716,0.00014380286,0.0000012910398,1.3711372e-7,0.99541175,0.00042378547,0.0016091337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039384348,0.000004275034,0.03427646,0.0021391881,0.00009592753,0.0000011256493,0.00029772203,0.0000012827942,0.000007992124,0.024060024,0.9385401,0.00018204055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95197135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.980226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016786756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019463776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99877906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782663601","doi":"10.7202/1042755ar","title":"La justice constitutionnelle face au mouvement conservateur : la Cour suprême du Canada et le gouvernement Harper (2006-2015)","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.01031204281901675,"score_gpt":0.24128070630020398,"score_spread":0.23096866348118722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782663601","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4537287,0.0051671313,0.009085641,0.06700972,0.0053836876,0.0005902835,0.000688665,0.00010807442,0.4582381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96573997,0.00105131,0.00024842273,0.004625888,0.00090350746,0.00003601692,0.000017577255,0.000015194709,0.027362144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972324,0.00051944156,0.00036586385,0.00041837464,0.00066759856,0.0007963278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99842626,0.0006089625,0.00016151753,0.00017729275,0.0002970425,0.00032890405],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011727922,0.00029571645,0.00033322864,0.00003996931,0.0026308063,0.00010757555,0.00036836285,0.00032222504,0.00047838452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043370406,0.00033061687,0.00010658347,0.00032969104,0.008458112,0.00020367403,0.00012676443,0.00045265356,0.00014000654],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003138065,0.00015687474,0.0041379184,0.00004107202,0.00019344415,0.00013205512,0.009192309,0.00017029908,0.000021434897,0.86470926,0.11976325,0.0014506989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006771316,0.00005636592,0.004433722,0.00010317397,0.00024599835,0.000031555257,0.04054381,0.00011109596,0.000074615586,0.0074983044,0.9458233,0.00040091734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95197326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9569662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85721093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043895156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00883578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782846791","doi":"10.11575/prism/5352","title":"Clashing Constitutionalisms in the Bill-of-Rights Era: Strength, Reach and Rights Values","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"BC Cancer Agency; Killam Trusts; University of Calgary","keywords":"Bill of rights; Political science; Human rights; Law","score_opus":0.05776863206415144,"score_gpt":0.37601311329719633,"score_spread":0.3182444812330449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782846791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3291271,0.0008688248,3.5240183e-7,0.00044903965,0.00045647047,0.00039569463,0.00004298083,0.0000011283176,0.6686584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99570066,0.00019202808,0.00013964584,0.000013958919,0.00023301502,0.000021123073,0.00015801784,0.0000027707235,0.0035387739],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986503,0.00016511146,0.00026520397,0.0002891475,0.0004456758,0.00018453306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915624,0.00024881808,0.00026446057,0.00016225495,0.00012772396,0.000040483086],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008384459,0.00015075933,0.00030150203,0.00006845057,0.0024079934,0.00034407998,0.00075204263,0.00019172844,0.00027761335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017976381,0.0000887141,0.000053600652,0.00010010417,0.001090648,0.00033167316,0.000050344286,0.00023762164,0.000027544138],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009536816,0.00018470563,0.0011896366,0.000012169942,0.00014989193,0.000051609826,0.07149242,0.0000022413049,0.000029251269,0.88522464,0.0019137327,0.039654363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046192526,0.000037385653,0.011646751,0.00071324187,0.0001475244,0.0000035088435,0.01960098,0.0000019278325,0.00022831914,0.4314226,0.5353267,0.00040911927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10806003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2441644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6665735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004602574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005054744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99889076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783105250","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0021","title":"The Canadian Living Tree Doctrine as a Comparative Model of Evolutionary Constitutional Interpretation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Constitutional interpretation; Constitutional law; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Comparative law; Constitutional economics; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05670185527763862,"score_gpt":0.34854772004902723,"score_spread":0.29184586477138863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783105250","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041057907,0.00072327355,0.0001972114,0.016415525,0.00027087456,0.00023724393,0.000038268547,0.00002298794,0.9410367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983849,0.00019005289,0.00008619623,0.00013236428,0.00016598782,0.00002275614,0.0000015777285,0.0000018597824,0.001014283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902487,0.00008718678,0.00013349649,0.00017802395,0.00035903676,0.00021739777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990002,0.00025408043,0.00013327067,0.00013777569,0.00037583555,0.00009882639],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025642026,0.00009186638,0.0001350538,0.000055279666,0.010200647,0.00020276934,0.00029359956,0.00004720053,0.000037735546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082398107,0.00007262252,0.00007785349,0.00004791301,0.0047958614,0.00023905392,0.000045163197,0.00012255066,0.000030698975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034621968,0.000029106603,0.0006719687,5.340486e-7,0.000050809704,0.0000010591449,0.030642716,0.00030886102,0.000009876259,0.9673277,0.00064694934,0.0002758118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000730008,0.00019421229,0.121594295,0.00030569168,0.00006975625,0.0000056690524,0.19066763,0.01118223,0.000048027807,0.6482935,0.02626121,0.0006478023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38357395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71642345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.957327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005313403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013362278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783786080","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0019","title":"Provincializing Constitutions: History, Narrative, and the Disappearance of Canada’s Provincial Constitutions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Scholarship; Constitution; Narrative; Political science; Dualism; Law; Constitutional law; Politics; Monism; Democracy; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.026344527004380475,"score_gpt":0.28402513399984786,"score_spread":0.25768060699546735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783786080","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051013328,0.004947291,0.000117283955,0.05208483,0.0011165354,0.00087708497,0.00006365379,0.000044857064,0.88973516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980011,0.0003443624,0.000037060894,0.00027853367,0.00033301295,0.000047967078,6.721277e-7,0.0000033858084,0.0009539024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875736,0.00015394171,0.00018349316,0.0002525921,0.00040861763,0.00024399649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990654,0.00015909129,0.0002314514,0.00020442154,0.00026206943,0.000077550445],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004034249,0.0001286068,0.00024889625,0.000029217801,0.008644629,0.00010684853,0.0002920608,0.00004768223,0.000038083766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019611625,0.00009517949,0.00006584603,0.000036048576,0.01397518,0.00022811448,0.00007779966,0.00015895245,0.000001684892],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000118787684,0.000035141333,0.00048652373,0.0000034711347,0.000042990967,0.000003921069,0.04681363,0.0000032497287,0.000008439003,0.9501416,0.0021915168,0.00015073176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003984861,0.00010741195,0.025073456,0.00028331898,0.00011489834,0.0000098776545,0.3553689,0.000032238946,0.000039122886,0.08009,0.5341909,0.00070503645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85655725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9125644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94698775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007415836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047344165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.992646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784938838","doi":"10.1177/0734016817753265","title":"Book Review: Seven deadly sins: Constitutional rights and the criminal justice system","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminal Justice Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.04826958772448457,"score_gpt":0.3410484643266069,"score_spread":0.2927788766021223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784938838","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000044681532,0.87479776,0.00067204627,0.007896992,0.000917128,0.0009947366,0.000020255582,0.00007994719,0.11457642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012613572,0.922905,0.00024104243,0.06031978,0.0027044637,0.0001545585,0.0000090007925,0.000008616769,0.0010439135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699867,0.0006840402,0.0006204192,0.00042270665,0.0007859801,0.0004881744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977497,0.0007156894,0.00027828824,0.00025916204,0.0007778481,0.00021929777],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020773034,0.00028047792,0.0007054119,0.000036700003,0.0036937182,0.000080058206,0.00043973056,0.00008234257,0.0004676321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016344099,0.00018026138,0.00019071784,0.00033539673,0.009429667,0.00029391915,0.00014583321,0.00024213437,0.00063022284],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003829869,0.000026406495,8.826205e-7,0.027047073,0.000051838026,0.000027635528,0.0015263727,9.99813e-8,6.3012675e-7,0.7937154,0.1746675,0.0028978712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030452674,0.000044012748,0.000015580135,0.025491912,0.022261968,0.00015755687,0.004849264,0.0000066062116,0.0000014580847,0.0006838694,0.9459184,0.00026484582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010457743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021683359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7930315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017748216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006007887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99760336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785581196","doi":"","title":"Canadian Judicial Council","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.044332980212497514,"score_gpt":0.26798919032090884,"score_spread":0.22365621010841133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2785581196","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015164787,0.00031059724,7.812252e-7,0.0162587,0.0012410546,0.00013854088,0.00010958115,0.000012583894,0.9667634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899052,0.0011665795,0.00005041067,0.000631378,0.0010281756,0.000010183125,0.0000029093926,0.0000064506535,0.0071987454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985976,0.000033198605,0.00015960171,0.00016107595,0.0004970704,0.0005514398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840474,0.000034202385,0.00009222354,0.00023820526,0.00035169322,0.0008789462],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005129964,0.00009486077,0.00017243162,0.00018995325,0.003460715,0.000077146105,0.00053862535,0.00010712566,0.00064906536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011464554,0.00010323441,0.000062164385,0.00016929749,0.00094173854,0.00020456342,0.000022690165,0.0000992387,0.00016087883],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003702148,0.0000068934028,0.04191711,0.000002249117,0.000030007683,0.000059117287,0.0036563086,0.0000012037992,0.000001344961,0.8394929,0.105643645,0.009185512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083181774,0.000008410177,0.043724045,0.000012407038,0.000012251034,4.1169616e-7,0.00049441535,3.6448728e-7,0.0000013917573,0.012529081,0.94301105,0.00012296964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9998469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9747404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012357207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023150291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99783665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785691160","doi":"","title":"Documents illustrative of the Canadian Constitution","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01979743399571784,"score_gpt":0.25003316364288447,"score_spread":0.23023572964716663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2785691160","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019815125,0.000120038225,0.000002472938,0.0052100765,0.00050787796,0.00025556498,0.00017741296,0.0000066629273,0.9739048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926273,0.00024075886,0.000020963584,0.00024029572,0.00013032717,0.000010671832,0.0000011814049,0.0000026245273,0.0067258603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989472,0.00007799738,0.00020551207,0.00012485056,0.00030531507,0.00033913026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917525,0.00006818428,0.00009890523,0.00012200887,0.00018083805,0.00035481932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022548581,0.00008466302,0.00014402904,0.00017948938,0.00080419343,0.000010487904,0.0002584633,0.00008515818,0.00022601112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027691104,0.000054768338,0.00006849967,0.00028764625,0.0019157907,0.00012417194,0.000017221955,0.000054453405,0.000018471084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021550584,0.0000035358312,0.033180587,0.0000017288725,0.000022497536,0.000002652955,0.0008368625,5.138252e-7,0.000012142221,0.95881116,0.004329442,0.0027967403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013153662,0.00001157091,0.05081886,0.00006595183,0.000017956709,5.659381e-7,0.00041679703,4.4338424e-8,0.000051240517,0.018470328,0.9299181,0.000097011245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9728122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004975581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069848336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99864465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787560304","doi":"10.7202/1042930ar","title":"La modification et la réforme de la Constitution canadienne","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; McGill University","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022731885394691863,"score_gpt":0.2926727815450801,"score_spread":0.26994089615038824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787560304","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34009147,0.001106904,0.0019288026,0.0059003304,0.0005440814,0.00014884114,0.00006043321,0.000054931745,0.6501642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99286216,0.0019515078,0.00053870905,0.00043408124,0.0011408571,0.000031135587,0.000013304126,0.00000798105,0.0030202372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822396,0.000606992,0.0002194069,0.00025709652,0.00014808845,0.0005444588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989883,0.00040579645,0.00011400814,0.00013186819,0.00014212435,0.00021790345],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001802295,0.000119000426,0.00019508673,0.000058594876,0.0007395547,0.00009120693,0.0002040037,0.0003126041,0.00015691144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043629736,0.00017514756,0.00009658071,0.00038282713,0.004521508,0.0002597481,0.000044505065,0.00026341956,0.00028802812],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012445578,0.00007384711,0.004520997,0.000025969546,0.000040256407,0.00003917924,0.006068795,0.000040816692,0.00012072514,0.96911365,0.0009765062,0.018966796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023844108,0.000048945865,0.029420786,0.0002545321,0.000090792586,0.00015948135,0.0018845508,0.00028016744,0.000057454963,0.36935407,0.5979518,0.0002589291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07996638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05308393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6527707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008595712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010021954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788057704","doi":"10.1017/9781108333436","title":"Canada in the World: Comparative Perspectives on the Canadian Constitution","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.07298257503164796,"score_gpt":0.32374955206061506,"score_spread":0.2507669770289671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788057704","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000019421199,0.0004731909,2.634287e-7,0.048346877,0.00032286285,0.00042441385,0.00006340033,0.0000061294004,0.95034343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56118643,0.00005210673,8.594858e-7,0.0021324493,0.00037965184,0.000024353245,0.0000056395106,0.0000013079224,0.43621722],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874896,0.00015977229,0.00010776785,0.0001839227,0.00053747505,0.00026211573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906117,0.0004869019,0.00008513565,0.00017283615,0.00012718215,0.000066763525],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004994324,0.00013843187,0.00018280216,0.000075167336,0.005158706,0.00016060018,0.0005769382,0.00007236454,0.0003686372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016367661,0.00007399977,0.00004723262,0.00008942498,0.0029357695,0.000044903427,0.00002015829,0.00039691507,0.00005690104],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013607419,0.0000027778444,0.000033182918,2.4113012e-7,0.000015655574,0.000009555212,0.0039951634,0.0000013838142,2.5594153e-9,0.64152545,0.35438865,0.000026546808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030863117,0.00000456076,0.00085483276,0.00004658114,0.000010119477,2.957719e-7,0.019563604,2.944788e-7,9.242102e-8,0.031240525,0.94813955,0.000108694345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9997946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6102849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027208864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033984665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788940108","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i2.5024","title":"THE SILENCING OF QUEER VOICES IN THE LITIGATION OVER TRINITY WESTERN UNIVERSITY’S PROPOSED LAW SCHOOL","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Dissent; Queer theory; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Law; Economic Justice; Gender studies; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.043494779736410506,"score_gpt":0.32876822792399235,"score_spread":0.2852734481875818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788940108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87783986,0.000069405396,0.000039024344,0.0025358617,0.0001775466,0.00034547137,0.0000067810306,0.000011652148,0.11897437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99904567,0.000034753324,0.00002128328,0.00034064538,0.00031346586,0.0000019179704,2.9488422e-7,0.0000021080589,0.00023983231],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904674,0.00016794767,0.00014920284,0.000108220214,0.00037731268,0.00015057034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991745,0.00035353488,0.00010687046,0.00010980327,0.00021752888,0.00003777071],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006690171,0.0000562357,0.00009907566,0.000039494862,0.00059192406,0.000059468435,0.00053900713,0.00003940885,0.000031622036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035123253,0.00003795452,0.000031716205,0.00033941155,0.0008996225,0.00032763917,0.00010177963,0.00008381119,0.000018717607],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044240966,0.00017369716,0.13372222,0.00009743297,0.000091764196,0.0000075392322,0.05181611,0.00006544864,0.0012766578,0.8090071,0.0014422063,0.001857403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069092953,0.00017226291,0.8507352,0.0003345151,0.00022663156,3.9460633e-7,0.056385696,0.000016824557,0.002609973,0.009150338,0.079414986,0.00026226332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029733028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048689697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7998568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053177973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020678095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9767281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789270301","doi":"","title":"Constitutional litigation in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.015026791794034853,"score_gpt":0.2214546581736937,"score_spread":0.20642786637965885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789270301","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060592666,0.00016882153,0.000008472035,0.005270405,0.00037485166,0.00012900498,0.000120711775,0.000007166612,0.9333279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997522,0.00042648462,0.000033009117,0.0003173488,0.00016057062,0.000013312816,0.0000030557246,0.0000017168509,0.001522524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990755,0.000044279197,0.00019032328,0.00011781101,0.00028047877,0.00029161357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994537,0.00012299942,0.00004526605,0.000058629783,0.00008299864,0.0002363927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001579032,0.00006467983,0.00011864897,0.00011638901,0.00022096696,0.0000052261817,0.00011877997,0.000038979237,0.00026494605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023134916,0.00005448355,0.000023605553,0.0002214011,0.0007546495,0.00010600538,0.0000096128015,0.000039292885,0.000013203644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020076222,0.0000023809293,0.10927947,0.0000011681879,0.0000050181275,0.000012110807,0.00016198991,0.000001216307,0.0000035095838,0.88048667,0.0030684518,0.0069760145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013449759,0.0000038453672,0.0981447,0.000043721913,0.0000033625047,5.289542e-7,0.00033322503,1.4724249e-7,0.00000799188,0.0149015775,0.8863323,0.000094103656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9369293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011586479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014248095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9913402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789366024","doi":"","title":"Canadian constitutional documents","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.015226040596533028,"score_gpt":0.2472831503337597,"score_spread":0.23205710973722665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789366024","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006226385,0.0002475313,0.00001160959,0.009002498,0.00063295575,0.00018906925,0.0002739786,0.000021015912,0.983395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97658,0.0009131253,0.000076895485,0.00075573236,0.00039034744,0.000020659654,0.000006213694,0.0000049914947,0.021252003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863213,0.00005203487,0.00021348098,0.00018748,0.0003381781,0.00057669694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998622,0.0000888924,0.00005442892,0.000113034475,0.00015284853,0.0009688003],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024189576,0.00011159981,0.00016383485,0.0004233268,0.0008145813,0.000020037654,0.00024890408,0.00009718077,0.0012439862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002480466,0.00009181217,0.00006630101,0.00026753123,0.0015727605,0.00018821431,0.000016119326,0.000054373533,0.00021612599],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021887874,0.0000037986947,0.032268994,0.0000011238933,0.00002241206,0.000018840738,0.00024157505,2.2942966e-7,0.0000039263437,0.9417498,0.020090362,0.005596732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014865138,0.00000924835,0.0131753255,0.000035447996,0.000011537899,0.0000013647017,0.00015370594,3.3729155e-8,0.00000436349,0.026369212,0.95994854,0.00014256386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9972402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97035366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085350394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008534098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789389557","doi":"","title":"The Canadian charter of rights annotated","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.014628410432451487,"score_gpt":0.23323175861119477,"score_spread":0.21860334817874327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789389557","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022796681,0.00030630644,7.5465834e-7,0.008671534,0.0004056247,0.00018830285,0.00013645376,0.000010352852,0.967484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894065,0.00047656702,0.000012087685,0.00018910255,0.00020995208,0.000012692833,0.000001764246,0.000004404628,0.009686889],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988586,0.00006468856,0.0002220999,0.0001230468,0.00027302478,0.00045857287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895436,0.00014347529,0.000078158315,0.00013620131,0.00020617218,0.0004816508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029365762,0.000086486056,0.00014809713,0.00020020569,0.0012811563,0.000015998881,0.00027812325,0.00007637424,0.00016201938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014167736,0.000052171552,0.00005956283,0.00024684603,0.0011079657,0.00008399707,0.000010792408,0.00004896953,0.000040437608],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004509734,0.0000035751586,0.007602735,0.000001247142,0.0000334354,0.000008828986,0.0012000019,8.8315595e-8,0.000009078652,0.96405756,0.019639218,0.00743973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008859185,0.000013091672,0.023199746,0.000024443652,0.000009748227,3.5576116e-7,0.00014548904,7.85984e-8,0.000018610772,0.02976263,0.9466511,0.00008609029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9985252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96660984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025136003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029298319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9853748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789436971","doi":"","title":"Canadian constitutional law: recent developments: cases, notes and questions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.0252766394452526,"score_gpt":0.2562476930917948,"score_spread":0.2309710536465422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789436971","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006110558,0.0008888249,0.000015847976,0.015675291,0.00044439896,0.00023378058,0.00046492091,0.000025196397,0.97614115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99056995,0.005218021,0.00033238073,0.0011900897,0.00021853491,0.000029295496,0.000011551,0.000005498584,0.0024246895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987997,0.00005826698,0.00022176497,0.00020390513,0.0002429218,0.0004734535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853224,0.00022385079,0.000051137347,0.00008587413,0.00021912213,0.0008877573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023465221,0.0001205141,0.00016337563,0.0002863922,0.0012046748,0.000025965255,0.00013546868,0.00009756824,0.00033122185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061003,0.000102642654,0.000030123429,0.0002201689,0.0020480747,0.00016923822,0.000019917074,0.00005961319,0.000041261814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022883669,0.00000461259,0.018892216,0.0000016756362,0.000021818942,0.000033936056,0.0002712767,1.6549092e-7,0.000002804145,0.9668949,0.0027206952,0.011153602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012693464,0.000010482769,0.016246151,0.00005857645,0.000014693722,0.000008429218,0.00014724277,3.1344573e-8,0.0000046237355,0.017481571,0.9657381,0.00016317161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.996562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9844594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000761638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008044702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99757874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789484898","doi":"","title":"Law, politics and the judicial process in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Process (computing); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Computer science; Sociology; Programming language","score_opus":0.010775525301997914,"score_gpt":0.22584919740994433,"score_spread":0.21507367210794642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789484898","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13111728,0.00030349998,4.8019905e-7,0.014333942,0.00019745782,0.00017971871,0.000055678625,0.0000046167347,0.85380733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974314,0.00059801637,0.000004184081,0.0010044802,0.00018589,0.000016125849,4.3020867e-7,0.0000033897284,0.0007560962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908364,0.00006130954,0.00016873196,0.00010784128,0.00024320035,0.00033525037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994212,0.00020405988,0.000043555454,0.00006260766,0.000065457265,0.00020314207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002153123,0.00006932046,0.00015573624,0.00006965628,0.00038978606,0.000008818378,0.00015215082,0.000034340464,0.000035551737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020019314,0.000043721826,0.000018718478,0.00015304018,0.0011315864,0.00006419765,0.00001519547,0.00004964009,0.0000017926021],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052939963,0.0000015150215,0.02073236,0.000002056139,0.0000062851486,0.0000070259066,0.0011057116,2.6168365e-7,1.8140338e-7,0.975922,0.00071372185,0.0015035765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057236047,0.0000068875484,0.035228312,0.00005110775,0.000014041408,9.625028e-7,0.002417626,3.669816e-7,0.0000038588237,0.20556591,0.7559972,0.00014139766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99995667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8663141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003653623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066939257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789538959","doi":"","title":"The constitution of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.012057547360161519,"score_gpt":0.21758791245485495,"score_spread":0.20553036509469344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789538959","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009721882,0.00044364715,0.0000054872016,0.006682241,0.0004895887,0.000118371456,0.00007599962,0.0000057375405,0.98245704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908312,0.0012222109,0.000012809296,0.00012598926,0.00014236516,0.0000073473752,5.3351226e-7,0.0000018382154,0.007655691],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991345,0.000044974822,0.00018211278,0.00008030517,0.00028420895,0.00027392484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992732,0.00022864061,0.00007753125,0.00009079908,0.00014180892,0.00018801968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024690348,0.000056183708,0.0001080982,0.000057263293,0.00070215855,0.0000053339245,0.00018141174,0.00003489128,0.000059754177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039637234,0.00003455664,0.000032968714,0.00015163262,0.0011361588,0.00005175978,0.000012578856,0.000028950462,0.0000030365134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032507041,0.0000016715969,0.005712828,0.0000011838025,0.000013653794,0.0000026108485,0.00015899235,2.9206083e-7,0.0000085346755,0.96770966,0.018282117,0.008105184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006633935,0.0000063624643,0.010555714,0.000022465456,0.000006982413,3.0263607e-7,0.00036582784,4.2558735e-8,0.000028165256,0.010748094,0.9781436,0.00005613992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9811093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024340149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008372813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99724877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789661329","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Constitution and constitutional amendment","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Amendment; Law; Constitutional amendment; Political science; Constitutional law; First amendment; Constitutional interpretation; Supreme court","score_opus":0.01891021911376111,"score_gpt":0.2420640362510535,"score_spread":0.22315381713729238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789661329","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038629095,0.00083699066,0.000028872104,0.016784504,0.0005443122,0.00025232308,0.00015689341,0.000015222977,0.97751796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99325234,0.002538194,0.000037358586,0.00041570805,0.00022647834,0.000025046476,0.0000027651788,0.0000022999939,0.003499807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884415,0.00006126549,0.00019366112,0.00015986159,0.000286462,0.0004546251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998884,0.00018959896,0.000056713012,0.00009519644,0.00014445867,0.00063004025],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040597407,0.000097372416,0.00012108983,0.00019119866,0.0028025282,0.00004507796,0.00015748371,0.00007845901,0.00009585136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002963165,0.00006428194,0.00003812585,0.00016307428,0.009854756,0.0001181673,0.00001723403,0.000059147827,0.00003197353],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028302736,0.0000020255586,0.011953947,8.607484e-7,0.000017831468,0.000007090528,0.00018893997,2.093337e-7,0.0000041140925,0.97505933,0.0053030984,0.007459722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001325422,0.000010392617,0.007260407,0.000028670196,0.000012528661,0.0000029077942,0.00024965996,1.0416689e-7,0.00000496139,0.029420868,0.9627711,0.000105821084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9854939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9893894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005776066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067922454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789867220","doi":"","title":"Forms and precedents of pleadings and proceedings in the Court of Chancery for Ontario","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.020137979995640952,"score_gpt":0.2455709152886668,"score_spread":0.22543293529302585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789867220","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7293546,0.0001609797,0.0000014879458,0.0011714635,0.000041999072,0.00031780562,0.00003425544,0.0000016822286,0.26891568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980659,0.00060796336,0.00004217285,0.000059360973,0.000041153464,0.000028421786,3.8652115e-7,0.0000022393501,0.0011524342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994354,0.0000056903355,0.000157687,0.000091024376,0.00014368065,0.00016651904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996477,0.00009050917,0.000084323445,0.00002853892,0.000080217564,0.00006873218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002977083,0.00005321116,0.00014823025,0.00010020308,0.00011631276,0.0000055005307,0.000100407015,0.00004126568,0.000009333927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010630923,0.000033691285,0.000021584448,0.000082652376,0.00047567065,0.000105468986,0.000012812206,0.000025382738,1.2688416e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002885095,0.000012078238,0.40223292,0.000037328842,0.000020868167,4.2858355e-7,0.024858285,2.3895042e-8,0.00005540932,0.5639296,0.00137143,0.007452737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005419191,0.00012009054,0.46037918,0.00022565242,0.000029109151,9.2084554e-7,0.0040878807,2.446443e-7,0.00008385827,0.05288511,0.48151815,0.0001278983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8723474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9944359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5110445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000072478935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043200437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17526284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789909885","doi":"","title":"The laws of government: the legal foundations of Canadian democracy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Democracy; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01678086834921078,"score_gpt":0.23949713164468536,"score_spread":0.2227162632954746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789909885","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01585771,0.00032086403,0.00000428436,0.027673805,0.0003486409,0.00024922742,0.00037966945,0.000004985452,0.9551608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838222,0.001932762,0.000025823609,0.00022709908,0.00019383071,0.000016286416,0.0000013871148,0.0000057493025,0.013774828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863243,0.00009176795,0.0003066545,0.000118598204,0.00046993414,0.00038059827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987619,0.00044129978,0.00015954589,0.00020443712,0.0001488293,0.00028401328],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047020311,0.000090248286,0.00016054619,0.00013201953,0.0013066018,0.00001894319,0.00045218947,0.000056251152,0.00013421681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005332914,0.00005181837,0.00008935722,0.00042899878,0.0015295264,0.0001228342,0.000026838423,0.000060996572,0.000011619913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038372395,0.0000047167696,0.00820184,0.000001915967,0.000038307062,0.0000016824919,0.00074464927,5.475598e-7,0.000013226501,0.96923816,0.011143498,0.010607619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000085467946,0.00001523929,0.026329791,0.000026156644,0.000024855852,3.9111356e-7,0.0010592351,1.9667884e-7,0.000025357318,0.019454695,0.95290625,0.000072387214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9946233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99981505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96796453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029409648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030565534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789936738","doi":"","title":"Canada's passive revolution: the Charter of Rights and hegemonic politics in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hegemony; Charter; Politics; Political science; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.00815801586929606,"score_gpt":0.1974836622062485,"score_spread":0.18932564633695242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789936738","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3128695,0.0011824387,9.844372e-7,0.02698736,0.0004876665,0.00030408235,0.0004248662,0.0000038390062,0.6577393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99706465,0.0003939458,0.000005245122,0.0003981724,0.0001382369,0.0000085650945,8.4715816e-7,0.0000025511417,0.0019878137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990135,0.000058505986,0.00020822081,0.00011012794,0.00028204784,0.00032759015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936295,0.00016239424,0.00007362677,0.000095327225,0.00009473684,0.00021099675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009919373,0.00007586693,0.00015979739,0.000070077964,0.00029677735,0.000003425628,0.00015092685,0.00003270077,0.00004884293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000087830755,0.000048969094,0.00001834398,0.00014903423,0.00044795912,0.00004533059,0.00001701475,0.00004922563,5.566024e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003274081,0.0000035705136,0.057450008,0.000006143486,0.000026086867,0.000028813667,0.00075057056,5.6005496e-7,0.0000022852503,0.90022457,0.038895857,0.0026082755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104839404,0.0000064051274,0.16492315,0.000047826717,0.000009062344,8.7063717e-7,0.00049177447,2.5641117e-7,0.0000074028294,0.014616354,0.8197074,0.00008468261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8856082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010514245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020338034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9852157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789956717","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190272654.003.0003","title":"William Schabas, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and International Human Rights Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Human rights; International human rights law; Ex post facto law; Supreme court; Right to property","score_opus":0.024477927705342403,"score_gpt":0.23609288479596288,"score_spread":0.21161495709062048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789956717","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008737278,0.000106401494,0.0000021923602,0.00016507541,0.00024254271,0.0001999071,0.00016585692,0.000014995077,0.9982293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12152848,0.000058569298,0.000017464958,0.00007600079,0.0004920499,7.985045e-7,0.00001868819,0.000004434937,0.8778035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999246,0.00005121487,0.00009058289,0.00019862602,0.00023936587,0.00017418791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945515,0.000046282355,0.00009917207,0.00009995821,0.00017351286,0.00012590615],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012882004,0.00012703717,0.00016668726,0.00007120383,0.0029953558,0.000053117303,0.00032321332,0.0001781279,0.000031206324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000031557997,0.000103051985,0.00004703502,0.000009309315,0.0042172293,0.000089561596,0.00015111217,0.0001581849,4.875668e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007486582,0.0000031237996,0.000030164261,0.000003547729,0.000108074084,0.000007899921,0.0014029808,2.2079412e-8,3.857591e-7,0.9881094,0.0102444785,0.00008242558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014219222,0.000017575898,0.000111793815,0.000060558406,0.000059448026,8.2689365e-7,0.000068924775,4.9619433e-7,0.0000028840896,0.08720501,0.912215,0.000115325514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.63246834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95078325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9019705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018162922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022273285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790073433","doi":"","title":"Limiting arbitrary power: the vagueness doctrine in Canadian constitutional law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vagueness; Limiting; Doctrine; Law; Power (physics); Constitutional law; Political science; Law and economics; Computer science; Economics; Physics; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.01717340547040141,"score_gpt":0.24184471734368335,"score_spread":0.22467131187328193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790073433","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031446654,0.00050452555,0.000002679716,0.013423848,0.00043662064,0.00024807625,0.00016682026,0.000016872775,0.9537539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960548,0.0005059426,0.000027813468,0.0016332768,0.00029421021,0.000028689128,0.000004030392,0.000005286586,0.0014459386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836254,0.00010085132,0.00028962074,0.00020530476,0.0003153337,0.0007263733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988123,0.00027778497,0.000066794644,0.00013832956,0.000111228255,0.0005935521],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005604653,0.00013040111,0.00019387824,0.00031784276,0.00095645466,0.000026251051,0.00033846276,0.00009970966,0.00030356794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028895494,0.00009205624,0.000068647496,0.000398081,0.002577646,0.00018656878,0.000023648241,0.00012069591,0.000036710167],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034967818,0.0000050831036,0.034883924,0.0000015327695,0.000013617296,0.000051762825,0.00042104317,0.0000011480483,0.00000406291,0.9621555,0.000934873,0.0015239628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017374387,0.000009696106,0.0309609,0.000065722714,0.000008379727,0.0000038749,0.0003883516,1.655598e-7,0.000007953696,0.029113388,0.9391127,0.0001550917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99822396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96460813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005822002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066656955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99896556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790103753","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Bill of Rights and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms: a bibliography","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Bill of rights; Political science; Law; Linguistic rights; Fundamental rights; Civil rights; Human rights; Bibliography; Right to property; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.009699090901198304,"score_gpt":0.21368838880503835,"score_spread":0.20398929790384004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790103753","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10719318,0.0034164663,0.000001082666,0.01093553,0.00029290537,0.00047422096,0.0002465456,0.0000074199525,0.87743264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955889,0.0032380582,0.0000129702075,0.00012050258,0.00012760292,0.000015812564,5.757917e-7,0.0000033199713,0.0008922838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893034,0.00010022608,0.0002472021,0.0001378021,0.00026113694,0.00032327438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988791,0.0003682302,0.000115626186,0.00014342571,0.00015638265,0.0003372725],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047320517,0.00010046861,0.00022134201,0.0010643554,0.0011234479,0.000022178092,0.00022454167,0.000073383344,0.000032149117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006358546,0.00004306479,0.00006994696,0.0008717994,0.0050174207,0.00009104859,0.000020495127,0.000052755844,0.0000016112876],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001863242,0.0000044104872,0.014186348,0.0000034017833,0.00008269857,0.0000032039752,0.0025673085,3.0874375e-8,0.000004240497,0.9645761,0.01691843,0.0016351395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033364617,0.00002154408,0.028048752,0.00004311534,0.00003173452,7.7960954e-7,0.00020175915,1.89467e-7,0.00001008244,0.24885944,0.7223671,0.00008182445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9987904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99985784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88839567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031985266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063718477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790232974","doi":"","title":"Commentary on Towards a new Canada: a study by the Committee on the Constitution of the Canadian Bar Association","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Association (psychology); Bar (unit); Political science; Law; History; Geography; Philosophy; Epistemology; Meteorology","score_opus":0.01803941888941992,"score_gpt":0.22786445196633334,"score_spread":0.20982503307691341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790232974","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052541364,0.00009221956,5.025615e-7,0.30714136,0.00066879374,0.00081864704,0.00050602126,0.0000065564095,0.63822454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98294485,0.00007916204,0.000001058881,0.012435564,0.00024298797,0.000028055072,0.0000028097425,0.000004643905,0.004260888],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806625,0.00035454743,0.00025516778,0.00015186881,0.0007719522,0.00040019068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986518,0.00049862673,0.00017437102,0.00024845244,0.00013058141,0.00029615802],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007155746,0.00013253205,0.00018354692,0.00007599934,0.0018589783,0.000023191986,0.00054348493,0.00007204195,0.00013213327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006088375,0.00006540371,0.00006927455,0.00027762755,0.00057817146,0.00004930189,0.000028541943,0.00016054233,0.0000069690263],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006506113,0.000018473009,0.050710745,7.1019076e-7,0.0000745211,0.0000020921475,0.0013951856,0.0000017424388,0.0000011358889,0.23347592,0.7115515,0.0027614876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020539103,0.000045332825,0.07496681,0.000038873484,0.000039049963,1.6288661e-7,0.0016938292,1.858315e-7,0.000012060301,0.0018657697,0.92103714,0.0000953968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9304035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027735063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012326821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790308452","doi":"","title":"Constitutional symposium: Edmonton, Alberta","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.014124158233504295,"score_gpt":0.23480186635732508,"score_spread":0.2206777081238208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790308452","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041068858,0.00024524104,0.000021290181,0.012057673,0.0005008374,0.00017293087,0.000089165515,0.000021267131,0.9827847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96414405,0.0017097573,0.00007224576,0.000540675,0.000581067,0.000025202738,0.0000044416656,0.0000047327835,0.032917812],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987636,0.000054481177,0.00023069645,0.00019556993,0.0003323855,0.00042323052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899215,0.00022842779,0.00006900853,0.000120924284,0.00015380706,0.0004356629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020327081,0.00011321038,0.00018153425,0.00014693604,0.0006054803,0.000014821187,0.00023231353,0.000093596704,0.0006156303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000277977,0.000088830726,0.000078949364,0.00021514611,0.0022714906,0.0001704495,0.000023542636,0.00004897091,0.0001466972],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046425025,0.000008280752,0.013459728,0.0000016731549,0.00002358064,0.0000073040947,0.00044160435,3.757027e-7,0.000026563468,0.9684358,0.014372216,0.0032181896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016239462,0.000013051324,0.0070478204,0.00004191824,0.000016405664,0.0000016198425,0.00012517069,6.19256e-8,0.000012043728,0.015288517,0.9771435,0.00014744599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9197487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9871609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96277136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024509354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021490902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8369402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790373006","doi":"","title":"Papers presented at the ... annual mid-winter meeting of the Alberta Branch of the Canadian Bar Association.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bar (unit); Association (psychology); History; Geography; Climatology; Meteorology; Geology; Psychology","score_opus":0.008638578241668351,"score_gpt":0.21487702310969048,"score_spread":0.20623844486802212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790373006","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.088566616,0.00019428869,6.104468e-8,0.037712198,0.0005255151,0.00031668716,0.00034761283,0.0000033310978,0.8723337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9436439,0.000119918455,0.0000018175276,0.00056986214,0.00017023533,0.000012605773,9.464655e-7,0.0000064609703,0.055474207],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983706,0.00023443991,0.00029935827,0.00014367155,0.00053639244,0.0004155462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985131,0.00052916934,0.00025326133,0.00023200664,0.00027104857,0.00020139889],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049168273,0.00010578941,0.00018388503,0.00007105932,0.0011305085,0.0000110121755,0.00059377,0.000105566,0.00028393604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015107524,0.000052350882,0.00016538474,0.00030362842,0.0009814661,0.00007223848,0.00008085755,0.000089385045,0.00000874461],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000102790245,0.000011541255,0.77610165,0.000008939986,0.00019216636,9.124525e-7,0.010797354,0.000007031231,0.00012873531,0.1436642,0.06693381,0.0021433914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010924819,0.000005679823,0.20420033,0.00006830524,0.00003385877,2.4615431e-7,0.0008390701,7.516342e-8,0.00011280689,0.0010415328,0.79351616,0.00007267067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.996302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8550773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007107657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002627017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86950713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790441490","doi":"","title":"Human rights and the courts in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01034025074101,"score_gpt":0.21691195389014975,"score_spread":0.20657170314913975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790441490","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21629277,0.00025622084,2.3279777e-7,0.00551942,0.00014387934,0.00014058212,0.000024588391,0.0000034656841,0.7776188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950568,0.00015290442,0.0000039731253,0.00026025806,0.000116424984,0.00001156054,3.3722694e-7,0.0000020822315,0.0043956665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992483,0.000066733846,0.00014339926,0.00009852294,0.00019702491,0.00024598895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955887,0.00013022938,0.00003891866,0.000067107845,0.000037233483,0.00016763377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022591576,0.000060159677,0.00013408324,0.000077702585,0.00052536605,0.0000073162655,0.00013115673,0.000027227356,0.00007751482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000559439,0.000034782817,0.000017835708,0.000094169205,0.0007107845,0.000050827093,0.000014459723,0.00003984371,0.00000225443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031024383,0.0000014253649,0.01958589,8.779628e-7,0.0000075723265,0.0000124171465,0.0006318422,1.2763569e-7,6.931989e-7,0.971073,0.007076997,0.0016060745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031374785,0.0000032843534,0.071654424,0.000023640929,0.000005837253,3.8297412e-7,0.00020943688,7.531424e-8,0.0000013763404,0.07629364,0.851423,0.00007115932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99998003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8947793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003361713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022617271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40407437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790522854","doi":"","title":"Judgments of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.015565338364391062,"score_gpt":0.21943433429358822,"score_spread":0.20386899592919716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790522854","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.108913705,0.00016703922,0.0000011090101,0.004680125,0.0004487079,0.00015416303,0.00020885382,0.000003028512,0.88542324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991768,0.00023909463,0.000013015057,0.00015844556,0.00008361349,0.000004429303,4.1255163e-7,0.000003148371,0.0077298256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989869,0.00004642748,0.00022053401,0.00008667042,0.00041549382,0.00024396583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993611,0.00009132692,0.000120658755,0.00012399866,0.00014435044,0.00015855362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017214882,0.00006339449,0.00016025915,0.000060523078,0.00022090462,0.0000018697148,0.00028238437,0.000038692717,0.00014120982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021294574,0.000040730305,0.000052004387,0.00017454881,0.00059417094,0.000042648444,0.000027019501,0.00003064981,0.0000011209028],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009726006,0.000016764034,0.16916023,0.000013902307,0.00007770271,0.0000037402865,0.0012901938,0.0000016840343,0.00014633038,0.75604504,0.06845677,0.0047778944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012376484,0.000010489423,0.10456186,0.000068106776,0.000016809805,1.7685267e-7,0.0003757507,5.991178e-8,0.00022810309,0.005989782,0.88854957,0.00007552887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9986124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99989843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88285434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020069478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005559978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9863162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790527389","doi":"","title":"Canadian constitutionalism: 1791-1991","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Political science; Law; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.018460070886187556,"score_gpt":0.24275998708922708,"score_spread":0.22429991620303952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790527389","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008183536,0.00043890195,0.0000058533897,0.0169564,0.00069965335,0.00021821754,0.00039914812,0.000031102012,0.97306716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97840524,0.0012912273,0.00007968806,0.001227886,0.0005704642,0.000025728166,0.000012311224,0.000008528185,0.018378932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843323,0.0000678106,0.0002527178,0.00022467072,0.00035821868,0.00066336186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983391,0.00013434372,0.00006573794,0.00014859601,0.00019647377,0.0011157523],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003059294,0.00013618181,0.00021031887,0.00049291184,0.0009427578,0.000021611926,0.00029909448,0.00012964288,0.0009543684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036740932,0.00011265021,0.00008559414,0.00035711168,0.0012204968,0.00018019514,0.00001827806,0.00007021627,0.00021199911],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024211033,0.000004219421,0.014330354,0.0000017022535,0.000023793458,0.000028219984,0.00038762914,3.5209683e-7,0.0000056514805,0.9500902,0.030006472,0.005118937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014220357,0.000010155258,0.012939006,0.000042265303,0.000015708809,0.0000021949813,0.00024121304,5.5777086e-8,0.0000044262897,0.025935661,0.9604871,0.00017996914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9987165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9702217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000836039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008121184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790575970","doi":"","title":"Seminar on the Constitutional Resolution and Legislative Authority in Canada, held in Ottawa on Friday, January 9, 1981 = [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.02025192265690053,"score_gpt":0.23419885440256072,"score_spread":0.21394693174566018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790575970","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.102658756,0.00022097155,0.0000026289106,0.01605018,0.0002493341,0.00029362994,0.00019942128,0.0000052762466,0.8803198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974144,0.0004352451,0.000012009962,0.0005809424,0.00014008439,0.000028971563,0.0000019006915,0.0000026105577,0.0013838061],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867743,0.00017067505,0.00023130422,0.00020690613,0.00035750194,0.000356182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902236,0.0005846359,0.00006659963,0.000093090304,0.000051777843,0.00018152122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004953291,0.00011330175,0.00017190917,0.00021476233,0.00041505205,0.000008875474,0.00014384286,0.00007088979,0.000044599423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004979576,0.000080008685,0.000025166744,0.0002590669,0.0011668715,0.00009055023,0.000019387808,0.00014769078,0.000006519335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001621158,0.00000903302,0.04137279,0.0000013976883,0.0000065966665,0.000027089274,0.0006678409,0.0000056585873,0.0000021985495,0.94544345,0.010402403,0.0020453164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025638592,0.00004043681,0.26168764,0.00020947492,0.000005384708,9.220861e-7,0.0010720175,0.00000231807,0.000009286084,0.026480263,0.7100634,0.00017246064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9989654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9189632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012113366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005932316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790687608","doi":"","title":"Constitutional litigation and social policy: a case study of the Canadian Court Challenges Program","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Constitutional court; Law and economics; Sociology; Constitution","score_opus":0.039457887416006025,"score_gpt":0.288097386304549,"score_spread":0.24863949888854298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790687608","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47160542,0.00030840797,3.4648937e-7,0.028145796,0.00021452048,0.0008512555,0.0001924235,0.00001736452,0.49866447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99878883,0.00025708822,0.000013878297,0.00012855382,0.00037877655,0.000052204967,9.568544e-7,0.0000031854247,0.0003765192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889475,0.000116255535,0.00020428807,0.00015506426,0.00031145316,0.00031818525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926984,0.00006620944,0.000092436625,0.000084552,0.00020011849,0.00028684456],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027431225,0.00009525669,0.00016498183,0.00018427211,0.0014063255,0.000016494037,0.00013948443,0.00008768491,0.00002067187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000167172,0.00006742472,0.000043421544,0.00021394074,0.0025579978,0.00008950396,0.000024313806,0.00006137821,0.0000016655459],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027123988,0.00003682617,0.017267006,0.0000057760294,0.000041506555,0.00005129787,0.0111641325,1.5298039e-7,8.398642e-7,0.93158317,0.0004946203,0.039351974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048799755,0.00009675406,0.10081393,0.00004629639,0.000051656632,0.000037804788,0.016891357,2.492516e-7,0.0000018828983,0.011129312,0.87025553,0.00018720159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9971246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92045385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035058937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055464595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791024954","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Reform Task Force of Alberta","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Task force; Task (project management); Political science; Public administration; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.016265304646928727,"score_gpt":0.25385163170135777,"score_spread":0.23758632705442906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791024954","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027094299,0.00062494935,0.0000040982013,0.00398693,0.0006217001,0.0001660792,0.00017048487,0.0000094473435,0.967322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99216205,0.0056620636,0.00010814055,0.00010025309,0.00024122707,0.000012067319,0.000010054437,0.0000030393278,0.0017011064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998878,0.000026006355,0.0002619094,0.00016251628,0.00032854287,0.0003430356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989614,0.00006604541,0.0002239096,0.00025398855,0.00022305764,0.00027159453],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002269637,0.00011070813,0.00023235215,0.00043016943,0.0016403982,0.000029488972,0.00049633795,0.00010795074,0.00012317968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035256348,0.00010436181,0.00015831714,0.0005137393,0.008967016,0.00023928683,0.000046526566,0.00006576704,0.000010984981],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074213394,0.000012672359,0.06062432,0.000006193244,0.00005204664,0.0000028976224,0.0006370562,3.077459e-7,0.0000105309155,0.93432754,0.0032723064,0.0010466763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014814136,0.000024342125,0.06303696,0.000039830964,0.000029813114,7.514351e-7,0.0010874291,1.8947206e-7,0.000020732938,0.015546063,0.919925,0.00014076482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9704912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96562093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007374663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009450527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791039105","doi":"","title":"The interpretation of legislation in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Law; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.010493313198760441,"score_gpt":0.22202251557321415,"score_spread":0.21152920237445372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791039105","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.074168555,0.00030869234,0.00001453188,0.0040847557,0.0003269193,0.00013628145,0.000029215062,0.0000028834481,0.9209282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99800617,0.00068799366,0.000009007613,0.00006110853,0.000053105417,0.000007196506,5.9352453e-7,0.0000017632779,0.001173092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999353,0.000050035775,0.00017995415,0.00006186596,0.00019152311,0.00016363522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995132,0.00021469855,0.00006975548,0.000055976496,0.000072618706,0.000073713425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019834965,0.000039073017,0.00008184019,0.00007948426,0.00016289562,0.0000036643125,0.000117367854,0.000021189879,0.000023431585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025116774,0.00002580057,0.000018692266,0.00015620227,0.00022974328,0.00006960661,0.000007426096,0.00002460646,0.0000015376671],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012234756,0.000002810262,0.11310061,0.000002127578,0.000012786266,0.0000027682993,0.0018942904,0.00000820686,0.000009889577,0.7580669,0.0030740895,0.12381328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011624631,0.000009485379,0.17642118,0.000059208534,0.0000055478504,1.2221156e-7,0.0014181914,0.0000045082843,0.000013446813,0.017248219,0.8046271,0.000076723096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99985486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9238376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004392252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004706902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8349842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791084497","doi":"","title":"Canadian constitutional law; cases, text and notes on distribution of legislative power","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Law; Constitutional law; Political science; Power (physics); Distribution (mathematics); Mathematics; Physics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.0180831666572255,"score_gpt":0.24571537157615297,"score_spread":0.22763220491892747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791084497","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039038356,0.0002957193,0.000016257589,0.0050999383,0.00023687391,0.0002098037,0.0019937328,0.000010120836,0.9530992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99814373,0.00033395464,0.000019131794,0.00028940898,0.000107753775,0.000009145893,0.000017793825,0.0000033685017,0.0010757385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989579,0.00005874032,0.00020508928,0.0001756473,0.00025545384,0.00034722462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880695,0.00036007364,0.000078311816,0.0000872037,0.00017842762,0.00048903347],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019878289,0.00011412691,0.00019369333,0.0001719509,0.00057614583,0.00001154538,0.00010710918,0.000094119,0.00018420216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052566367,0.000090345675,0.000049000835,0.00017198938,0.0027478912,0.00012984997,0.000013073951,0.000057881665,0.000015688449],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008326936,0.000006795777,0.011436375,0.0000018641865,0.000022130529,0.000020147814,0.00044761706,4.6374464e-7,0.0000058747796,0.98416996,0.0018626597,0.0020177553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018358917,0.000057134865,0.032867204,0.00008185181,0.00001731437,0.0000032584762,0.00024824083,8.560422e-8,0.000024871835,0.013862712,0.95250285,0.00015091828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99311227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99892634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9703073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044010853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030513254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791295975","doi":"10.29173/alr1296","title":"Liberte, Egalite, Argent: Third Party Election Spending and the Charter","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Political science; Parliament; Democracy; Ambiguity; Election law; Politics","score_opus":0.02474879796624335,"score_gpt":0.29517656153908367,"score_spread":0.2704277635728403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791295975","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016979219,0.12747146,0.000018598937,0.04565605,0.00034966978,0.000635008,0.0000012817552,0.000029593999,0.8241404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8117445,0.1780128,0.000015469464,0.008438005,0.0003378865,0.000065774744,0.000002883881,0.00000482847,0.0013778495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991698,0.00012186411,0.00017281514,0.0001495561,0.00018998947,0.00019594633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995968,0.00016599488,0.00006255858,0.00008663346,0.000034276665,0.000053742002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051897974,0.00008579532,0.00021121574,0.000007113477,0.0010546403,0.00004907009,0.000101080084,0.000030299578,0.00011525417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018291,0.000051568608,0.000083691404,0.00019424601,0.0006435523,0.00016689776,0.00003238623,0.000081805556,0.00015368116],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034586153,0.00000958982,0.00013451262,0.000034673903,0.000022892333,5.161819e-7,0.000629354,8.4710955e-8,0.0000010470075,0.9969235,0.00069039525,0.0015499946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021991468,0.000007173387,0.00029963412,0.0005420832,0.00006759947,0.0000038901835,0.000037307378,2.2127116e-7,0.000005350977,0.05655425,0.9421793,0.00008328177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057016563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06066275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9414889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036597092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041748528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9564777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791299629","doi":"","title":"The constitution and the future of Canada.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.006423685823632976,"score_gpt":0.201836617749313,"score_spread":0.19541293192568002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791299629","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007184098,0.0034671887,0.0000026755304,0.037893772,0.000547482,0.00018733577,0.000059793398,0.0000041697363,0.9506535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889491,0.006357434,0.0000066608677,0.0002609818,0.00032334024,0.000009815114,3.3424172e-7,0.0000015729728,0.0040907543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927557,0.00007319781,0.00014610263,0.000072019924,0.00022713868,0.00020599808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929917,0.00031893695,0.0000702128,0.00008272176,0.000101564256,0.00012737226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037261687,0.000054227246,0.00011071074,0.000032454365,0.00096911506,0.000008329104,0.00015340943,0.00003414958,0.000019581668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021012097,0.00002522776,0.000026351747,0.0001118891,0.0024921647,0.000041654763,0.00001564013,0.0000366,7.1156956e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009698039,7.573528e-7,0.0021274942,0.0000010625522,0.000014050591,0.0000010946193,0.0003490147,8.6767805e-8,0.000001091794,0.9736046,0.011431648,0.012459383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017852844,0.0000037076818,0.007959038,0.000014382831,0.000010903193,5.711714e-7,0.0011121847,7.511998e-8,0.0000036338033,0.022249322,0.968425,0.00004264811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99500495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98176503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098485376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004031946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9182485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791322463","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.12496","title":"Courts and Issue Attention in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Homosexuality; Normative; Publication; Democracy; Gay rights; Political science; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.01184551207464701,"score_gpt":0.28542451609320557,"score_spread":0.27357900401855856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791322463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8545678,0.000037838367,0.00001007703,0.004532401,0.00059419,0.00008537984,0.0000025689055,0.000012835115,0.14015688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989505,0.0000050828285,0.000012267378,0.0002901017,0.0006092327,0.0000042987253,2.0191332e-7,0.0000011624982,0.00012714672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988869,0.000039866023,0.000097594,0.00017253288,0.00048205446,0.00032104307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99972034,0.000020818476,0.000032871656,0.000029632674,0.00012134898,0.00007499715],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005083212,0.000048649264,0.00007798387,0.000040708164,0.0019296359,0.00006336917,0.00014545445,0.000022436967,0.00006178219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004071068,0.000047939815,0.000011016768,0.00040322726,0.0026749128,0.00025841827,0.000010389105,0.000046535515,0.000021678105],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010537551,0.000027221768,0.07952135,0.0000021737576,0.000005080547,0.000008659917,0.065685734,4.1279872e-8,0.0005369306,0.6682253,0.0024662644,0.18351074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018341366,0.00008858045,0.83021486,0.000013682462,0.000004792756,5.759073e-7,0.086539716,0.000010726695,0.000014700831,0.047311258,0.035422057,0.0001956635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9763257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9911131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7506935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045175612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020050132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99936974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791414840","doi":"","title":"Canada's constitutional crisis: making sense of it all (a background analysis & a look at the future)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.02144210785168073,"score_gpt":0.26035994424447123,"score_spread":0.2389178363927905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791414840","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041022506,0.001703091,0.00004327152,0.046147913,0.00064598006,0.00029000602,0.0009462954,0.000013913189,0.909187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920045,0.0009332734,0.000040606512,0.002320435,0.00043516484,0.000013316822,0.000007811465,0.000004413174,0.00424049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827236,0.00011826197,0.00035377312,0.00022161972,0.0006103845,0.00042359607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888605,0.00024987798,0.0001772085,0.00019773726,0.00023385308,0.0002552677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037656285,0.00013796054,0.00030212794,0.00023045269,0.0006917577,0.000014076441,0.00024106662,0.00007884473,0.0007616546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000090852394,0.00009236455,0.0001614552,0.00053630304,0.0017056995,0.000083775354,0.00004841372,0.00006446854,0.000011123372],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014476617,0.000008808457,0.020104669,0.0000049684513,0.0005707945,0.000036303758,0.0007143175,0.000011582792,0.000007987164,0.8656356,0.111814804,0.0010757055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001133119,0.000006515717,0.016522298,0.000023899773,0.000272675,0.0000022456536,0.002436347,3.7430277e-7,0.0000061709893,0.0020100542,0.9784652,0.00014093657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9959987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.950982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007137911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068249702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791771367","doi":"","title":"Constitutional reform: the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Constitutional court; Constitution","score_opus":0.0168130720639207,"score_gpt":0.22657525410799623,"score_spread":0.20976218204407554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791771367","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010321424,0.00026746915,0.000008541558,0.014720296,0.00043534226,0.00014986366,0.0002654362,0.0000070961255,0.97382456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928075,0.00046968975,0.000024271847,0.00037698154,0.00022753542,0.000010477102,0.000001957806,0.000002340339,0.0060792174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988329,0.000048544694,0.00023151212,0.000109615044,0.00045128324,0.00032618214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921745,0.00014254353,0.000090158,0.000119099175,0.00020056851,0.00023016591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029841013,0.000080431775,0.00015546373,0.00005887906,0.0005687487,0.0000051207394,0.00026993285,0.00004778236,0.00027614526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023830829,0.000048486676,0.000048870865,0.00017814845,0.0023264894,0.000075640455,0.000021482429,0.000048229664,0.0000051274765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042777015,0.0000034666436,0.0060769995,0.000001976822,0.000023874101,0.0000043964415,0.0002234169,6.093804e-7,0.000007567308,0.9717119,0.020254355,0.0016872016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010212798,0.000008447881,0.015685229,0.00003184781,0.000012051167,0.0000011037176,0.0005782061,8.781915e-8,0.000022206266,0.009141596,0.97433424,0.00008284647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99886966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9824861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055358314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009815446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791789151","doi":"","title":"Judicial power and the charter: Canada and the paradox of liberal constitutionalism","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Charter; Political science; Law; Power (physics); Law and economics; Judicial review; Sociology; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.007233095060857148,"score_gpt":0.2024177882020161,"score_spread":0.19518469314115897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791789151","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11532881,0.0021258702,0.0000034138066,0.04307103,0.0005061272,0.0004158228,0.0002059072,0.00000668226,0.83833635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956184,0.0017244222,0.0000070418423,0.0010544268,0.00017915787,0.000016539845,7.1513654e-7,0.0000026104808,0.0013966704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904436,0.000118940494,0.00020880897,0.00011460924,0.00028901326,0.0002242738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909097,0.00048585958,0.00008880454,0.000087182045,0.00008980447,0.00015738426],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042981823,0.00008441299,0.00022116514,0.000049735034,0.0005912858,0.000011774166,0.0001496871,0.000041454095,0.00006219156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026313376,0.0000424293,0.000041060714,0.00009956057,0.0060613086,0.000062537525,0.000029551973,0.000052736337,9.4807626e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039928844,0.0000017115224,0.0051412336,0.0000014003774,0.000032971027,0.00000285775,0.001285979,7.236109e-8,7.6508866e-7,0.98673177,0.0052554216,0.0015059129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015148532,0.000010498897,0.040499393,0.000039905215,0.00004433847,0.0000040626974,0.00055115676,3.0011617e-7,0.0000026766504,0.08554803,0.87166935,0.00011545522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99683326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99940073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9011837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000064315005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025629092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791856132","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: commentary","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.012194072452736583,"score_gpt":0.2243525603185302,"score_spread":0.21215848786579364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791856132","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03614922,0.000780229,7.2565973e-7,0.033012968,0.00035519758,0.00021330296,0.00018432047,0.0000071302643,0.9292969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995411,0.0008261811,0.000017747128,0.00079501787,0.00023225203,0.000010939893,0.0000015704311,0.0000035744386,0.0027017256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991366,0.000053948854,0.00017191506,0.000105559455,0.00019664667,0.00033531676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916315,0.000165162,0.000056128345,0.000105095074,0.000086671,0.00042378524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025032728,0.000075252094,0.00013009578,0.00013870659,0.0011538303,0.000014266444,0.00018861826,0.000056358356,0.00007930175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060610673,0.000046210633,0.000035862016,0.00011100243,0.0015466127,0.00007844607,0.000015736625,0.000042539068,0.000007427092],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005076869,0.000004416998,0.024503196,0.0000022444733,0.000045838085,0.000007405674,0.0020365,2.8341868e-8,0.0000052115042,0.88730264,0.07552796,0.010559501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010657843,0.000014864854,0.022059245,0.000026215224,0.000011488321,4.1514951e-7,0.00026875522,6.092692e-8,0.0000069394014,0.03683158,0.94060063,0.0000732328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99895287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9592618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017613063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009728169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8874446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791996533","doi":"","title":"Courts and country : the limits of litigation and the social and political life of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01566359509162293,"score_gpt":0.2388463706458857,"score_spread":0.22318277555426277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791996533","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5896691,0.0010518874,0.0000010051461,0.03867208,0.000105028106,0.00019797248,0.00018365885,0.0000025254149,0.37011674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99835765,0.00068187545,0.00000348486,0.00046109804,0.00014594902,0.0000044972926,4.2885637e-7,0.000001970079,0.00034303142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993019,0.00007176978,0.00015171163,0.000072077964,0.00021614051,0.00018636286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922824,0.00040543498,0.00006806037,0.000039593902,0.00009289914,0.00016577276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002867113,0.00005204552,0.00014441325,0.000028777278,0.00043683322,0.000006873848,0.00006676026,0.000039020317,0.000008678929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003929471,0.000028806919,0.000013636012,0.00005118884,0.0025050153,0.000039402697,0.000016472268,0.000033627097,5.2260575e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009048634,0.0000014156669,0.009545441,0.00000593561,0.00001710175,5.169541e-7,0.0015333043,1.6699866e-8,0.0000024599535,0.98591924,0.0016130866,0.0013524062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076321553,0.00002788001,0.4918329,0.00007377251,0.00008325895,0.0000019010103,0.0063793557,0.0000012019035,0.00002045211,0.11143416,0.38923368,0.00014821599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9899432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99776345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8744851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046527635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022304684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92298335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792013488","doi":"","title":"The Courts and the Canadian constitution: a selection of essays","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Selection (genetic algorithm); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.01220189338478134,"score_gpt":0.22739063859373906,"score_spread":0.21518874520895773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792013488","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007970705,0.000770192,0.0000056082176,0.017716585,0.00030637125,0.00027153565,0.00004897597,0.000007827917,0.9729022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946085,0.0020373163,0.000012409016,0.00021576617,0.00018028369,0.00002020428,5.24749e-7,0.000002399872,0.0029225568],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990809,0.000106676875,0.00018266652,0.00010407078,0.00022929921,0.0002963716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991158,0.00027021804,0.00008080369,0.000082723,0.00018613017,0.00026427527],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006418573,0.0000721366,0.00013613577,0.00011167073,0.0019859283,0.00002496852,0.00016229266,0.00006344158,0.000050409475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039820257,0.000038172166,0.000042218213,0.00016352018,0.0038144416,0.00007346846,0.0000124817725,0.000056076162,0.000004939022],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009123304,0.0000013010236,0.0062145363,0.0000012131777,0.000021844475,0.0000013224449,0.0005500174,2.4836666e-7,0.0000014702428,0.98313135,0.0033164364,0.006751135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026056587,0.000010322933,0.012108552,0.000026555095,0.000023066788,0.0000022671238,0.00033041555,5.7115795e-7,0.0000055293813,0.05696097,0.93020236,0.00006880789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99601454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98663783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021118417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004159789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99931335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792065432","doi":"","title":"Essential readings in Canadian constitutional politics","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.013747967056137825,"score_gpt":0.24955647669545558,"score_spread":0.23580850963931776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792065432","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029247262,0.00016492228,0.000010323327,0.0074821077,0.0005005678,0.00017696364,0.00026747715,0.00001534768,0.962135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923512,0.0005015784,0.000052772477,0.00048827604,0.00043983918,0.0000138031855,0.0000059799163,0.0000049958503,0.006141565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843156,0.000053729163,0.00025805703,0.0001907068,0.0002872224,0.00077872875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986928,0.00011605235,0.00005193467,0.00009254702,0.0001298745,0.0009167796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003014804,0.000111090885,0.00018646478,0.00063807383,0.00052582193,0.000017296848,0.00021795284,0.00011894621,0.00041784224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041932357,0.000099348654,0.00005613534,0.0003376271,0.0020764703,0.00015471682,0.000015364796,0.00007409636,0.00006837955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016901869,0.000004785949,0.07619637,0.000001674247,0.0000096557305,0.00003271445,0.00047683806,3.4946987e-7,0.0000063128277,0.9182956,0.004085308,0.00088869646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001695479,0.000007971329,0.02525123,0.000055080578,0.000008767274,0.000001939314,0.0002491948,1.7518725e-7,0.000010803397,0.032375623,0.9417148,0.0001548603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9990038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99989265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96310395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009630776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010645592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9949631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792361819","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Charter of Rights, annotated","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.014768192462779689,"score_gpt":0.23259725121897612,"score_spread":0.21782905875619643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792361819","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016481124,0.00037360386,8.721088e-7,0.009807859,0.00040687397,0.00019105976,0.00015466117,0.000010801742,0.97257316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886718,0.0006199352,0.000013313589,0.00020685462,0.00021523309,0.0000132914665,0.0000020020575,0.0000046611062,0.0102529125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884194,0.000065761786,0.00022707148,0.0001245588,0.00027467837,0.0004660007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894893,0.00014415346,0.000079479796,0.00013982382,0.00020567578,0.0004819334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030948909,0.00008786281,0.00015067063,0.00020072053,0.0012735266,0.000016560725,0.0002858074,0.00007767924,0.00017703902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014949696,0.000052986634,0.000060906317,0.0002535842,0.001179566,0.0000844624,0.000011301588,0.000050898576,0.0000398783],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042949864,0.000003454103,0.008019709,0.0000012601461,0.000033052343,0.000008057303,0.0010550251,8.276148e-8,0.000008248633,0.9598999,0.022984378,0.007982563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008832392,0.000012976997,0.022347718,0.000024311259,0.000010174642,3.632264e-7,0.00016130712,7.6534576e-8,0.000017046761,0.026282683,0.95096755,0.00008744507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99856937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9721907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002593173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030365773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97950655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792469002","doi":"","title":"The law of legislative power in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Law; Political science; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.011832098586689304,"score_gpt":0.2205554428286424,"score_spread":0.2087233442419531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792469002","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0275956,0.00036887592,6.0223834e-7,0.0048123025,0.00026288227,0.00011892624,0.00006466073,0.0000025206593,0.9667736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957231,0.0005690702,0.000007293426,0.0002004563,0.0000532985,0.000008072222,2.8371048e-7,0.0000027644135,0.0034356555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911237,0.0000597868,0.00019630062,0.000088236586,0.0002588109,0.00028450604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932563,0.00028975983,0.00006892531,0.000086027976,0.00008910214,0.00014055653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021087144,0.000060104638,0.0001303855,0.00005883699,0.00028718758,0.0000042990578,0.00019457182,0.000029193565,0.000067863715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016624085,0.0000378883,0.000028909175,0.00017608146,0.0007175348,0.00006513658,0.000015511288,0.00004029338,0.0000029457885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003929822,0.0000019821318,0.02073791,6.339489e-7,0.000010528955,0.0000051853694,0.0010917492,2.9657284e-7,0.000002755317,0.9723924,0.0030340848,0.002718591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008534441,0.000007900051,0.03712434,0.000026280046,0.0000031308266,1.1060109e-7,0.0013387917,3.3855777e-8,0.000010374738,0.014216017,0.947125,0.00006265386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.999953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9681275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004561407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006396459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99923635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792526048","doi":"","title":"REVISITING THE ROLE OF PRESUMPTIONS OF LEGISLATIVE INTENT IN STATUTORY INTERPRETATION","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Supreme court; Interpretation (philosophy); Statutory law; Law; Legislative intent; Legislature; Consistency (knowledge bases); Substantive law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Judicial interpretation; Reflexivity; Meaning (existential); Presumption; Legislative history; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.045856590037909255,"score_gpt":0.333922354086168,"score_spread":0.28806576404825873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792526048","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006944829,0.21615936,0.00001099129,0.06482619,0.00016171872,0.000931395,0.000045518213,0.0000052879186,0.71091473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805719,0.01901259,0.0000058656583,0.00025556755,0.000053690415,0.000015241203,7.190716e-7,0.0000012657545,0.00008312135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993927,0.00017149228,0.0001647049,0.000051551844,0.0001180469,0.00010149004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944985,0.000088172375,0.00017057509,0.0001506183,0.00010676481,0.000034028322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009371336,0.000035641067,0.00012539889,0.000017781129,0.000771021,0.000015956122,0.00030198394,0.00001345359,0.000054017535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00097379484,0.000021422144,0.000046776822,0.000059062913,0.0007562155,0.00007738912,0.000028236906,0.000070597394,0.000008159735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017365145,0.0000022197655,0.00593044,0.000057933434,0.000020401261,4.145498e-7,0.008232228,0.000002674178,0.0000037647462,0.8678754,0.0001582015,0.11771461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060576658,0.000009331378,0.1242018,0.006056004,0.00007637885,4.0634006e-7,0.0044195526,0.000025000581,0.000007213872,0.0297142,0.8353364,0.00009316479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.63217366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8075404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9736271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010301028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047261015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59301484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792609118","doi":"","title":"The Charter of Rights and the legalization of politics in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legalization; Charter; Politics; Political science; Law; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.008160842049296506,"score_gpt":0.20574274220281943,"score_spread":0.19758190015352292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792609118","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19207746,0.0007767462,0.0000025631855,0.0092981635,0.00022551467,0.0002239139,0.00007586592,0.000001751582,0.79731804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978547,0.0005847767,0.000002844484,0.00008193554,0.00005595633,0.0000047536146,3.2488126e-7,0.0000013660906,0.0014133244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937254,0.00006412536,0.00017958709,0.00005159844,0.00017676884,0.0001553503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951136,0.00020698842,0.00007287702,0.00006327877,0.00007801045,0.000067473244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020774854,0.00003991084,0.00011047023,0.000046096775,0.00022481069,0.0000032843811,0.000110905676,0.000020153644,0.000013464746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011656336,0.000019867326,0.000016884103,0.00010271467,0.0008862913,0.000036582944,0.000009824328,0.00002132017,2.3968877e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003990111,0.0000011677683,0.013629735,0.0000016927826,0.000007906883,6.3367503e-7,0.0010452354,2.0096185e-7,0.0000012991239,0.98290664,0.0014367745,0.00096471515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032258,0.000007706198,0.068372674,0.000046396457,0.000012547882,2.5043593e-7,0.00091149885,9.4014206e-7,0.000028260984,0.09895168,0.83128387,0.00006161973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99980134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88395494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012544921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022928193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4067363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792689572","doi":"","title":"A Selection of human rights laws in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Law; Human rights; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.018931944683196845,"score_gpt":0.25612481088258676,"score_spread":0.23719286619938992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792689572","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33307305,0.00003950925,1.3568142e-7,0.00040274134,0.00017818408,0.00010582837,0.000024749359,0.0000032516257,0.66617256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997448,0.000058040932,0.00001840457,0.000048356378,0.00015037814,0.00000907982,0.0000019917186,0.0000032093294,0.0022624978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905866,0.000040390718,0.00022251096,0.00012601499,0.00026639484,0.0002860288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994132,0.000032583335,0.00014756012,0.00012533463,0.000095086856,0.00018624341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017306318,0.000076553544,0.0002002201,0.00015638123,0.0011620672,0.000014500542,0.0002775049,0.00005090243,0.00011387987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008284196,0.00007911113,0.00003448252,0.00011873013,0.00036195267,0.00011247714,0.000018924475,0.00007679855,0.0000020783173],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044834273,0.000010498137,0.2868778,0.0000072452112,0.000019949744,0.000018295153,0.00084996613,0.0000020149057,0.000015581012,0.7061862,0.0046338094,0.0013741839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001513846,0.000016322367,0.3870322,0.0000410312,0.000010731357,3.3541008e-7,0.00026821424,7.961595e-7,0.0000506323,0.016360212,0.5959437,0.00012441052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99999166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68982595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054908654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041564563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8937799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792748244","doi":"","title":"Historical perspectives on law and society in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.012872879426871753,"score_gpt":0.21374554614386754,"score_spread":0.20087266671699577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792748244","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045161027,0.00068256044,4.96316e-7,0.0053022085,0.00018467945,0.000089109264,0.000022527849,0.0000056573904,0.9485517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949712,0.0017423172,0.000023707571,0.0005354214,0.00014620757,0.000007559279,1.6897151e-7,0.0000032296243,0.0025701562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924535,0.000032348882,0.0001194187,0.0001452427,0.00020695795,0.00025068593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953187,0.00012261352,0.000030171263,0.0000548275,0.00004177153,0.00021872652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000118226235,0.00006672894,0.00013567042,0.00005793434,0.00024917227,0.0000046853343,0.00008501736,0.00003885753,0.00004168166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000084347215,0.000052977626,0.000031000614,0.00011698037,0.00031275087,0.00005411536,0.000011081898,0.000050872393,0.0000017063558],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027087642,0.000006000833,0.014856473,0.0000013539278,0.000008068843,0.000008209177,0.0028455907,1.4567061e-7,0.000001852941,0.97033,0.009983486,0.001956125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011630891,0.000012616,0.055831403,0.000022888506,0.0000037058571,2.2507919e-7,0.0038567162,5.982604e-8,0.0000013417633,0.005109029,0.9349533,0.000092447364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9652209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030461517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003298612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7965581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792825857","doi":"","title":"Report on certain aspects of the Canadian constitution: report to the Senate of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.016024998151706205,"score_gpt":0.23431682335143503,"score_spread":0.2182918251997288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792825857","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030754156,0.00007896507,0.0000011278631,0.039085925,0.0009494093,0.0003902281,0.00018209945,0.0000052388014,0.92855287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898903,0.00003647663,0.000008776442,0.00080254016,0.00021072755,0.000015409409,0.0000016898284,0.000004572563,0.009029557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981616,0.000089271096,0.00044854812,0.00020627544,0.00066001207,0.00043425753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839056,0.00012886006,0.00025681136,0.00037924937,0.0003465415,0.0004979864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006448574,0.00011840782,0.00023536032,0.00015488308,0.00090541935,0.0000084067615,0.00039599492,0.000071587274,0.000079552934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014109319,0.00006868863,0.000081469705,0.0004489691,0.0010069069,0.00004288001,0.000029693074,0.000082525665,0.0000031670197],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054841994,0.000005128054,0.021340301,0.0000042252655,0.00004308709,0.0002943297,0.0004783995,0.000012119538,0.000011021788,0.9450744,0.031917598,0.00081393647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064033964,0.0000131112365,0.047802754,0.00009604796,0.000018697467,0.000025452928,0.00024672068,6.0554875e-8,0.0001609009,0.004093356,0.9473728,0.00010609623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95913607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091649767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036861233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96859884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792851599","doi":"","title":"Judicial Adaptation to the Uncertainties of Constitutional Transformation: the Canadian Supreme Court and Courts of Appeal [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.024553875644505705,"score_gpt":0.24064638132707977,"score_spread":0.21609250568257407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792851599","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05250623,0.0006028714,0.00024979963,0.06748209,0.0006087029,0.00084722484,0.00082757795,0.000010778175,0.87686473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987002,0.00039467835,0.00003493573,0.00034379674,0.0001948952,0.000018183913,0.000004194301,0.000002585628,0.00030650906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988827,0.00007525242,0.00028705774,0.00009966961,0.00039797428,0.00025734009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991087,0.00017166231,0.00009469513,0.0000887232,0.000294973,0.00024126419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005064541,0.00008521264,0.00016487615,0.00018414202,0.0008330975,0.0000126734285,0.00020394719,0.00006187808,0.00006733369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018634021,0.000051484734,0.000047637972,0.00020591659,0.0026574782,0.00011223241,0.000010570951,0.000051107017,0.0000039328233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012052374,0.0000033562098,0.0027806913,0.0000045911297,0.000028464237,7.961476e-7,0.008242769,0.00002944799,0.0000053513954,0.9796147,0.003285273,0.0059925136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020193856,0.000041984556,0.028861515,0.00007877237,0.000042119405,0.0000017563787,0.0048451764,0.000004914929,0.00002043459,0.019180333,0.9466036,0.000117444535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9817624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9604344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016985708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004389442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9791589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793037611","doi":"","title":"The Constitution of Canada and its amendment: a selected bibliography","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Amendment; Bibliography; Law; Political science; First amendment; Supreme court","score_opus":0.010789396172482674,"score_gpt":0.21379660803455355,"score_spread":0.20300721186207088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793037611","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12811494,0.0026369232,0.000002679019,0.0042921393,0.00031591774,0.00026258687,0.00016979006,0.000011577468,0.86419344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98539335,0.013541056,0.000006953715,0.00008471154,0.000068843045,0.0000114698805,7.988002e-7,0.0000020489508,0.00089075894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911314,0.00005212606,0.00017778167,0.000102717444,0.00026720614,0.00028705297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924403,0.00018367938,0.0000828328,0.00006071486,0.00020906758,0.00021964898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019984075,0.00006905233,0.000120074066,0.00056581263,0.000684571,0.00000990358,0.00012417657,0.00003714712,0.000026660644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018564782,0.000044829572,0.000025894211,0.0014497545,0.0007464052,0.00007137678,0.000013715558,0.000032931515,7.7619075e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008369896,0.000003961202,0.0256173,0.0000041883322,0.000044446606,0.000003514528,0.00022875021,1.6906816e-7,0.00008257674,0.9518917,0.018868823,0.0032461623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013725714,0.000016858243,0.037592318,0.000039008384,0.000016602447,6.6990407e-7,0.00024907818,1.3569e-7,0.0000957209,0.0053654383,0.95639795,0.00008895713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99634665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9465263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000785878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003375218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59874916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793037671","doi":"10.29173/alr2452","title":"The Unbroken Supremacy of the Canadian Constitution","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; State (computer science); Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Political science; White supremacy; Sociology; Mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.027442162155786824,"score_gpt":0.30934088775324664,"score_spread":0.2818987255974598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793037671","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003424755,0.026554467,6.52819e-7,0.03705733,0.00046459792,0.00032065486,0.0000029484795,0.0000041149033,0.9352528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820721,0.012907903,0.0000032035023,0.003843593,0.0001868282,0.000013047451,6.074297e-7,0.0000013007876,0.0009714179],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992388,0.00013558255,0.00015612278,0.000080688274,0.00020392839,0.00018488248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993354,0.00020366811,0.00006592717,0.00015496428,0.00017738514,0.00006266393],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046299244,0.00005204767,0.00011114673,0.0000045831584,0.0032021345,0.000023169301,0.0003019769,0.000026769329,0.00013608416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065755396,0.000026660873,0.000074145515,0.00023228092,0.0039035468,0.0000540716,0.000036733363,0.0000506631,0.00014292152],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.6153244e-7,0.0000022677136,0.0009578842,0.000011518388,0.0000121511175,8.041886e-8,0.00015344746,1.762611e-8,6.428456e-7,0.9917925,0.005611409,0.0014576219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020543517,0.000004452694,0.0008246166,0.0004082574,0.000032042008,6.5342203e-7,0.000033593456,1.3336798e-7,0.000009111479,0.009146872,0.9894803,0.000039388393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96728885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9838689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000076524375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007940299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99880725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793196969","doi":"","title":"Making the case: the right to publicly-funded legal representation in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Political science; Public relations; Public administration; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03167765921511646,"score_gpt":0.27662567300074437,"score_spread":0.24494801378562792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793196969","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10805211,0.00014412234,0.0000064536443,0.0593947,0.00044341557,0.00034863345,0.00005054203,0.000007550738,0.83155245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994719,0.00007776185,0.000012965365,0.0013402856,0.00024693765,0.000040043014,6.504927e-7,0.0000040557893,0.0035582937],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998853,0.0001362552,0.00020363061,0.00015609215,0.0002893221,0.0003616611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920547,0.0003247012,0.00005900834,0.0001638866,0.00008457389,0.00016233952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037795163,0.00007688753,0.000112729176,0.000113789116,0.00073528715,0.00003682529,0.00029680334,0.000029974652,0.00015576104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004026439,0.000041644904,0.000031154654,0.0004666895,0.0002658631,0.00013377296,0.00003409989,0.000068415044,0.00000795161],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058800965,0.0000030737215,0.042283922,0.0000012021915,0.000017057253,0.00032212178,0.0015856153,0.0000058637534,0.0000016929673,0.8947985,0.045142718,0.01583231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007141097,0.000004497535,0.03175623,0.000019792134,0.0000070315878,0.000012093205,0.0029262155,5.297414e-7,0.000004837759,0.0057044933,0.959408,0.000084860345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99995744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9142653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078259106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037519955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6655879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793217254","doi":"","title":"Canadian constitutional history and law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitutional law; Political science","score_opus":0.018394988321984995,"score_gpt":0.22012845102206197,"score_spread":0.20173346270007697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793217254","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040279035,0.0013215591,0.0000042540173,0.0064253807,0.0005205093,0.00013065165,0.0001446382,0.000016672755,0.98740846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835673,0.0011430131,0.00006329682,0.0014291293,0.00029608194,0.000013353787,0.0000030574095,0.0000043939103,0.013480371],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902076,0.000042460902,0.00015744056,0.00016759854,0.0002096865,0.00040203027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886,0.00009017527,0.000041194566,0.00008260836,0.000105359184,0.00082065875],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019922336,0.00009362026,0.00014633963,0.0002529932,0.0005645388,0.0000089776695,0.00013484393,0.00008789921,0.0006472862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013139268,0.000079827994,0.000038399234,0.000092803006,0.003210911,0.00014253167,0.0000133088415,0.000050087256,0.00003595157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001710545,0.0000022210365,0.0061463616,0.0000015137063,0.000012809427,0.000018577513,0.00033719442,5.2976226e-8,0.000004617964,0.97515225,0.015893586,0.0024291072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011163969,0.000008533545,0.0056823934,0.000026130125,0.0000108754,0.0000025436013,0.00012458122,3.838957e-8,0.0000016514267,0.020863788,0.9730432,0.00012461469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9983057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9795394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012894535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067909574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99950176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793301790","doi":"","title":"The law of the Canadian constitution","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01673740854964344,"score_gpt":0.23218839346987977,"score_spread":0.21545098492023632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793301790","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004893778,0.00034432756,0.0000011487783,0.015766967,0.000661638,0.00021759239,0.00010597036,0.0000070889423,0.9780015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935468,0.0004777519,0.000008561139,0.00046723167,0.0001767259,0.000011792556,5.584092e-7,0.000002854662,0.005307716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893606,0.00008679941,0.0002005084,0.00010547567,0.0002989676,0.00037217917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910426,0.00016912639,0.000086539105,0.0001702499,0.00016724523,0.00030255623],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037368925,0.000075736185,0.00011574167,0.000081029444,0.0021900604,0.000018151262,0.0003699727,0.00007462132,0.000061916195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003141957,0.000039916165,0.00007563025,0.00023711211,0.0034681165,0.00007745588,0.000020874464,0.000059350183,0.000016749871],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016486647,0.000001642236,0.007616476,9.349429e-7,0.000013686041,0.0000012850275,0.00035844307,2.6810778e-7,0.0000053391486,0.98462164,0.0045095272,0.0028690917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006935532,0.000006013025,0.014400271,0.00003290216,0.00001253274,5.2782104e-7,0.00027037112,4.6597666e-8,0.000025323243,0.029774742,0.95534235,0.00006555177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9985919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.988653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035709114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005523764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99924386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793387171","doi":"","title":"Minutes of proceedings of ... annual meeting of the Canadian Bar Association.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Bar (unit); Geography; Psychology; Meteorology","score_opus":0.010898487691069313,"score_gpt":0.21397217813948677,"score_spread":0.20307369044841744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793387171","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20373419,0.00019379618,8.8131095e-8,0.0039843554,0.00017706015,0.0001810044,0.00041284552,0.000004197408,0.79131246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99344367,0.00018185347,0.000054554836,0.00007785361,0.00013217579,0.0000065771455,5.50387e-7,0.0000049544715,0.0060977917],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871683,0.000029472132,0.00035192142,0.00011431825,0.00046137974,0.00032606552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984748,0.00016806155,0.00035931685,0.00006581266,0.00070498395,0.00022703553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005377646,0.00008320613,0.00024345831,0.00020238539,0.00032769566,0.000005184944,0.00031178354,0.00010800013,0.00006732711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012356875,0.000059727354,0.00009629888,0.00034509538,0.00062246475,0.00011320581,0.000025401043,0.000051310748,0.0000020578475],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036667127,0.000009279005,0.5045136,0.000018574796,0.000063966436,4.8612225e-7,0.0044803326,4.3643504e-7,0.00015377032,0.4722358,0.016959041,0.0015610486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019302143,0.00003146998,0.26214162,0.00024331054,0.000057416844,2.49856e-7,0.0029346338,1.3076429e-7,0.0007405873,0.009178958,0.72432846,0.00015013854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99882466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7897095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040958117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032694652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5799891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793781899","doi":"","title":"Section 1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: interpretation of a signpost","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Law; Computer science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.009246597112698233,"score_gpt":0.21373629752223214,"score_spread":0.2044897004095339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793781899","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33995548,0.0002004531,0.000009281726,0.0014098978,0.0004110933,0.00026815076,0.00020899529,0.000003760696,0.6575329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99897516,0.00008096208,0.000020607373,0.000046032663,0.00008629708,0.0000052416635,8.4938534e-7,0.000002565243,0.0007822964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992795,0.00005890513,0.00022367343,0.000088778324,0.00019257174,0.00015659748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993676,0.000077294695,0.00014274186,0.000085215,0.00017768584,0.00014948822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017576622,0.00006063666,0.00015672477,0.00019609858,0.00021477471,0.0000033637375,0.0001247746,0.00006791718,0.00005768716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011062462,0.00004006047,0.000049562448,0.00017376486,0.0010002077,0.00008314796,0.000011398893,0.0000343569,8.4224035e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040378713,0.000025717207,0.08452468,0.000045152778,0.00014109752,0.0000025341017,0.02210609,0.0000018584294,0.0011929745,0.8699411,0.00442763,0.017550793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074880704,0.00021196491,0.39251518,0.0007393535,0.00014656813,0.0000024249166,0.0020164815,0.000006304022,0.0015746215,0.105369866,0.49629402,0.00037442287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99523425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76457125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001193906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001149407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36853072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794092487","doi":"","title":"Canadian constitutional dilemmas revisited","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.018936438924443157,"score_gpt":0.24261475620774955,"score_spread":0.2236783172833064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794092487","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004499221,0.00043076187,0.000018043344,0.0104297055,0.0004253482,0.00023065145,0.0004700483,0.000029344943,0.98346686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842959,0.0012100287,0.00009490309,0.00090347737,0.00055311865,0.000020719159,0.000012711842,0.000006536279,0.012902621],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984972,0.000072304436,0.00025924173,0.00021950231,0.00034245712,0.0006092862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984053,0.00013252432,0.00006799693,0.00014144008,0.00021391586,0.0010388525],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030936959,0.00012946065,0.00021147818,0.0004972577,0.0008820805,0.000021243142,0.00026497935,0.00011697667,0.0012784539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044376974,0.000106232874,0.00008369107,0.00039126162,0.0017225574,0.00016595815,0.000017387896,0.00006942163,0.00019025414],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026432547,0.00000353437,0.026256485,0.0000019867973,0.000022143779,0.000024757372,0.00021822462,1.9793463e-7,0.000005563643,0.94501436,0.023583554,0.004866548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013898495,0.000010246029,0.015771497,0.00006413156,0.000015927444,0.0000019432905,0.00012153216,6.9089275e-8,0.0000039578626,0.017699214,0.9660032,0.00016933512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99460554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99941105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97979665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007939688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008157354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794211010","doi":"","title":"1998 constitutional cases: an analysis of the 1998 constitutional decisions of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Constitutional court; Constitutional right; Political science; Constitutional law; Constitution","score_opus":0.023666251795728156,"score_gpt":0.24995885561176595,"score_spread":0.2262926038160378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794211010","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42660758,0.0004812035,0.00011111211,0.0041017416,0.0012069095,0.00060404476,0.008190126,0.000010012804,0.55868727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99879307,0.0001770738,0.000047659243,0.00017950349,0.000086448665,0.000009445293,0.000009061434,0.0000027367903,0.0006950167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782425,0.00016053635,0.0005709597,0.00019722621,0.0009247706,0.00032224998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979792,0.00072936417,0.0003476867,0.00032118644,0.00035929724,0.00026321757],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004237595,0.00013526522,0.0004066416,0.00024655336,0.00074707833,0.000005098154,0.000613181,0.000087137254,0.00015722727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001056707,0.000079941914,0.00025084525,0.0009530948,0.009496755,0.00010715526,0.000069252725,0.000079029254,0.0000010597578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010554144,0.000025247064,0.13907802,0.0000031567276,0.0002582009,0.0000035632038,0.00030819036,0.000109159046,0.000043581902,0.8572117,0.0026593101,0.00028933233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039532376,0.00003401489,0.31755286,0.00021751858,0.0007413082,0.000006017956,0.0013279101,0.000010326198,0.00015597903,0.009923158,0.66937494,0.00026065524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9845097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84728855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036030062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019292999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9931988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794302138","doi":"10.1017/9781108551069","title":"Legislated rights securing human rights through legislation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Legislation; Legislature; Political science; Fundamental rights; Law; Reservation of rights; International human rights law; Object (grammar); Right to property; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.038012670556905624,"score_gpt":0.3137025319868059,"score_spread":0.2756898614299003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794302138","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023457962,0.00034887635,0.00014524435,0.00027426842,0.0009736367,0.00037538438,0.000014364866,0.00031359363,0.99732006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.054363176,0.000030142255,0.00014916273,0.000113372684,0.00552246,0.000014593254,0.00008842756,0.000013651551,0.939705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979058,0.00009242768,0.00035646712,0.00045204308,0.00076651236,0.00042675246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991002,0.000087964356,0.00021458707,0.00018833169,0.0003244894,0.00008443577],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028618466,0.00029580644,0.0003752139,0.00008392378,0.005338654,0.000119592856,0.00033730624,0.00046440744,0.0024483856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017266611,0.00024309925,0.00017312425,0.0001366417,0.0016485188,0.0003991447,0.00009428254,0.00027269757,0.0011256513],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028647194,0.000014308924,0.0000058150727,0.0000025541312,0.00008028165,0.000007947019,0.002137658,2.5772442e-7,0.0000012813038,0.8334961,0.16421656,0.000034384484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006968335,0.00001605301,0.000011217738,0.00006700583,0.00003262618,3.3920162e-7,0.00002361156,3.2642026e-7,0.000008771515,0.48204914,0.51752675,0.00019448437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05786824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16118793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35331017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000426076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038471443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794329758","doi":"","title":"A collection of the acts passed in the Parliament of Great Britain and of other public acts relative to Canada.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Law; History; Politics","score_opus":0.02150704029958448,"score_gpt":0.22950356082112341,"score_spread":0.20799652052153894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794329758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4666319,0.00015206612,0.0000027545746,0.018626843,0.0001175435,0.00052723085,0.00013456563,0.0000015699484,0.5138055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99802566,0.00009133075,0.000012534513,0.00026132364,0.000026473866,0.000015830818,1.976838e-7,0.0000025608335,0.0015641174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909353,0.0001416916,0.00020469147,0.00008817073,0.00029580438,0.00017611442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935734,0.00021915561,0.00012331443,0.00009096022,0.00011254859,0.000096675016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002887877,0.00005963508,0.000157401,0.00010572013,0.00013297288,0.000003766638,0.00016362341,0.000038949907,0.000022309841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040676806,0.00003466891,0.00002764392,0.00040981127,0.0003928008,0.000051509178,0.000019289051,0.00003554576,1.8104696e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003228225,0.000032737185,0.21259438,0.000017553508,0.00007823969,0.0000025407865,0.016355949,0.0000018904377,0.00017574836,0.75597495,0.008777454,0.0059562786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002857912,0.000054088698,0.39819685,0.0001398529,0.00002103844,3.9444495e-7,0.0033068922,2.1049615e-7,0.00020357598,0.0060195285,0.5916793,0.00009248959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9954859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99989086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7499554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021552137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002780193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4931943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794389905","doi":"","title":"The constitution of Canada; an introduction to its development and law,","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01438493784112939,"score_gpt":0.22537250416981824,"score_spread":0.21098756632868884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794389905","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15033515,0.00037496697,0.000015460277,0.028466407,0.0007420001,0.00033207808,0.000051113966,0.000011464589,0.81967133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99676335,0.00021195778,0.00007919144,0.00019676973,0.00030645484,0.000012667087,9.925735e-7,0.0000020158711,0.0024266087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992229,0.000040305273,0.00017009235,0.00011817044,0.00022565297,0.00022290698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939424,0.00006327202,0.000050005903,0.00007068481,0.00015510488,0.00026672147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002971744,0.000058390535,0.00009631423,0.00006060433,0.0008054062,0.000009031236,0.00010431899,0.000029681149,0.000018673998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020992254,0.000039493294,0.000010270665,0.000117232485,0.0004997905,0.00008774825,0.000014948046,0.00002330768,0.0000013240327],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057497373,0.0000024308674,0.0006467148,0.0000016613053,0.000010111783,0.0000012375086,0.0006952994,6.3894095e-7,0.00003629199,0.9796968,0.003566331,0.015336744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052132393,0.000012553402,0.006719956,0.00001232937,0.000004853194,5.846186e-7,0.0005478937,5.0827847e-8,0.0002517397,0.0019205946,0.99041194,0.00006537868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9865482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99991757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9868456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026407727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040932186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7261194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794874452","doi":"","title":"The death and life of constitutional reform in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.016455836345146028,"score_gpt":0.22352274858123627,"score_spread":0.20706691223609025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794874452","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08059169,0.0008543431,0.0000016252709,0.0054978374,0.00019258603,0.00011273414,0.000090846595,0.0000025440268,0.9126558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996512,0.002414342,0.000012807667,0.00016590707,0.00006971135,0.000007576927,5.2421177e-7,0.000001435687,0.0008156761],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923855,0.00003108394,0.0001922983,0.000083493374,0.00022532171,0.00022925102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994223,0.00017771669,0.000057074394,0.000060020768,0.00007225141,0.0002106337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021215348,0.000054682503,0.00011853226,0.00007071083,0.00032328002,0.000004404279,0.00012247788,0.000028844137,0.00002767098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002660129,0.00003382241,0.0000175724,0.00010705728,0.0012160862,0.000055076667,0.000016969312,0.000035025452,0.0000010175759],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038177163,0.0000013357246,0.10971146,0.0000012844507,0.0000080596,0.0000032050202,0.00011537205,1.9509947e-7,9.822546e-7,0.88630885,0.00059970224,0.0032457274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013457004,0.000006722902,0.20164855,0.000035129422,0.000005051536,5.1957954e-7,0.0009427351,1.3705902e-7,0.000003759024,0.014880737,0.78227407,0.00006799331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99982524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9159203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067661743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012847258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.992749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795683816","doi":"10.29173/alr1256","title":"Alberta's Energy and Utilities Board and the Constitution of Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency","keywords":"Tribunal; Charter; Law; Treaty; Supreme court; Constitution; Political science; Duty","score_opus":0.0182470349305277,"score_gpt":0.24023471591979728,"score_spread":0.22198768098926958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795683816","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00076927955,0.20285265,0.0000057986904,0.1099879,0.00009543691,0.00020861469,0.000004998224,0.0000044290377,0.68607086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90225,0.08453517,0.0000039035276,0.012753109,0.000059001708,0.00001319987,0.0000010950545,0.0000012693048,0.0003832733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993358,0.0001181494,0.00016301902,0.00010806798,0.00016086154,0.000114089555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917865,0.0005911255,0.00005963045,0.000048817572,0.000048918027,0.00007286793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015072255,0.00006711964,0.0002500117,0.0000024173958,0.0004567555,0.000011948811,0.000075199736,0.000018578101,0.000057560435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005329422,0.00004309382,0.000031204047,0.000088719,0.0020960518,0.000057153244,0.000047382448,0.000030188037,8.682269e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064624132,0.0000017091704,0.00019593633,0.00009292539,0.000023204992,3.0487575e-7,0.0005094811,7.42397e-8,2.8701464e-7,0.99397933,0.003968056,0.0012222464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012596443,0.000006105799,0.000055030498,0.00025316686,0.000055561864,9.305241e-7,0.0002695273,0.0000023564123,0.0000036138244,0.0047721285,0.9943998,0.000055826073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9933767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9944686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9904317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013981566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032019868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.772299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796422130","doi":"10.29173/alr1428","title":"Political Corruption, Judicial Selection, and the Rule of Law","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Politics; Language change; Political science; Rule of law; Selection (genetic algorithm); Judicial opinion; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.020830815458883486,"score_gpt":0.3077665183746738,"score_spread":0.2869357029157903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796422130","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018421505,0.028345805,0.0000021305755,0.026424378,0.00007183057,0.0002731413,0.000002240639,0.000010873105,0.94302744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9625141,0.02544674,0.000011214621,0.011077187,0.00024701093,0.0000238886,0.000001442327,0.0000027996612,0.0006756229],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915546,0.0001685384,0.00020291611,0.00010472067,0.00018876496,0.00017960618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994429,0.00031625986,0.000035967612,0.00005885355,0.00008926998,0.000056766366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038693147,0.00006241838,0.00023802648,0.0000040655923,0.0007400721,0.000014373854,0.000090196736,0.000031218147,0.0008431933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016054414,0.00004056816,0.00006942388,0.00014029192,0.0019655775,0.00007236007,0.00001602717,0.000057749887,0.00008008524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007694498,0.000013150265,0.00015261483,0.000028009388,0.000016631104,1.0982088e-7,0.00021135269,5.6547172e-8,2.8274445e-7,0.9972508,0.00040297344,0.0019163295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001466181,0.000008892629,0.00024434243,0.00024728727,0.000079087484,0.000002943509,0.00002599783,6.6826544e-7,0.0000021525873,0.10035071,0.89883673,0.000054550605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2399427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057409197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96067196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018042125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006126834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95979065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2797169896","doi":"10.3968/10230","title":"A Comparative Study of the Formal Rule of Law and the Substantive Rule of Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Principle of legality; Rule of law; Law; Philosophy of law; Political science; Comparative law; Public law; Situational ethics; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.042627356750520616,"score_gpt":0.3157325904034565,"score_spread":0.27310523365293593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2797169896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59489304,0.000047150683,8.024357e-7,0.000292857,0.00009511065,0.00019662223,0.000021718339,0.0000015790499,0.40445113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996744,0.0000036547938,0.0000044410326,0.000208637,0.000081277634,0.000005188872,7.724038e-8,9.2270903e-7,0.00002142376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989405,0.00011649288,0.00014801053,0.000109601824,0.00043669448,0.00024864724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992472,0.00008636177,0.0001242078,0.00006816727,0.0003979515,0.00007613229],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087184156,0.000051844465,0.00018036102,0.000024491976,0.0030859183,0.00001979869,0.00040948915,0.000024476436,0.00001287233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007508633,0.000031951084,0.000036581467,0.0005793326,0.030207878,0.00017302654,0.00008067688,0.00005310732,0.0000011344512],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008983163,0.00001637172,0.004718748,7.343893e-7,0.000010507946,1.1827983e-7,0.11568777,7.5236e-8,0.000053506523,0.87939274,0.000020846535,0.0000895695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001537321,0.00024877617,0.15557596,0.000047114114,0.00009408396,5.346171e-7,0.72329867,0.000010690485,0.0021987595,0.10083636,0.015890496,0.00026124503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67058414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8818887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7785564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000083810846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075132295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982119},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799495960","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3137307","title":"Administrative Constitutionalism and the Unity of Public Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Law; Administrative law; Public law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.04635665402241745,"score_gpt":0.3261685844317794,"score_spread":0.2798119304093619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799495960","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19056118,0.008170407,0.0023939938,0.054402635,0.00051781244,0.00026298122,0.000010944371,0.000026858112,0.7436532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99671006,0.0023241034,0.000012077854,0.0002417983,0.0004904902,0.0000022795496,3.5634034e-7,0.0000012755021,0.00021756104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863476,0.00026468563,0.00013913243,0.00006721462,0.00025940474,0.00063478394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993312,0.0001668756,0.00010037129,0.00003858255,0.00031215642,0.000050838717],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029163465,0.000053494547,0.000107560016,0.000020105615,0.0020361193,0.000042262986,0.00014833668,0.000033098437,0.000036938705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034421697,0.00003390059,0.000044744564,0.00014426175,0.009976128,0.00014161051,0.000029185054,0.00038911926,0.000006008271],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028401571,0.0000140718885,0.00053680583,2.8371832e-7,0.00007669166,2.7502128e-7,0.0011434044,3.913784e-8,0.000003598953,0.997078,0.000031024832,0.0010874055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004177568,0.000070377806,0.00038275606,0.0000055040186,0.000018905423,0.000032701755,0.012241647,6.409775e-7,0.000010713169,0.9451144,0.04166075,0.000043849628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051202904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07485767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8061489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016060709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042226026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799508378","doi":"10.15688/lc.jvolsu.2017.4.20","title":"The Constitution and the Supreme Court of Canada: from Appellate Tribunal to Final Court of Appeal","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Concept","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Tribunal; Law; Supreme court; Constitution; Political science; Remand (court procedure); Original jurisdiction; Law of the case; Certiorari; Court of record","score_opus":0.025763139659692853,"score_gpt":0.27549725383311535,"score_spread":0.2497341141734225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799508378","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51046157,0.0044404753,0.00070189976,0.12739107,0.0021748072,0.0010181796,0.0005209702,0.000023233457,0.35326776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99909055,0.00008530987,0.000015113355,0.00019008164,0.00023628546,0.000005373476,0.0000016069564,0.0000013097,0.00037439447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989935,0.000091553586,0.00019419787,0.00011476106,0.0004129919,0.00019296033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916285,0.00028956743,0.00016955963,0.0001474071,0.00016782217,0.00006276415],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048118373,0.00007250344,0.00019443502,0.0000068958875,0.0023884736,0.000066552944,0.00034153427,0.000035177007,0.000024601435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047734904,0.000043527358,0.000043623866,0.000041869615,0.005102972,0.00008420026,0.000098281904,0.00009130762,0.0000017809633],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001878902,0.000007372416,0.0035217914,0.000001309682,0.000059363887,0.0000026290852,0.0017482891,0.000019170462,0.00004557249,0.9860203,0.0063744537,0.0020118072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020802126,0.000067502064,0.0728619,0.000094372524,0.000100861056,0.0000019242327,0.007644231,0.00007019278,0.00073709455,0.025675053,0.8904379,0.00022874762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8773667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.823415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9603453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051013365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011262947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799731806","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199579891.013.10","title":"Federal Judicial Tenure","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Successor cardinal; Scholarship; Incentive; Politics; Political science; Legislature; Law; Public administration; Economics","score_opus":0.0386980725004983,"score_gpt":0.2568387159796858,"score_spread":0.21814064347918752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799731806","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000022745891,0.00015744199,0.000022678923,0.00021242484,0.0007444611,0.00028500753,0.000117534735,0.00011941099,0.9983183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018477294,0.00054141134,0.000023653594,0.00008231398,0.001453922,9.046703e-7,0.000020023206,0.000011734553,0.9960183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986472,0.000068654124,0.0001052879,0.000326789,0.00048462325,0.00036742006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991649,0.00005520048,0.0002169541,0.00023752605,0.000176883,0.00014853025],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014330143,0.00021885746,0.00033471885,0.00006704413,0.0044534653,0.00013536481,0.00062875496,0.00042327822,0.000040130915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045612134,0.00025004704,0.00021363575,0.0000072450002,0.0017899296,0.00012444974,0.00034218837,0.00037293902,0.000005317607],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041627434,0.000008368753,0.00002117146,0.000007321118,0.000107826665,0.00013995815,0.0007941003,3.0033092e-7,2.9976746e-7,0.90264875,0.092389315,0.0038409415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022715415,0.000019091556,0.00005153981,0.00009381262,0.000102332626,9.596262e-7,0.00025170422,3.3309323e-7,9.668772e-7,0.01435173,0.98461133,0.0002890269],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00678801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00619921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89222205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042364546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014258747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800654004","doi":"10.3390/laws7020014","title":"Assessing Judicial Empowerment","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Empowerment; Politics; Law; Human rights; Situated; Political science; Expression (computer science); Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.052326344257165786,"score_gpt":0.37533473754192725,"score_spread":0.3230083932847615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800654004","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13770041,0.00008791537,0.00018450353,0.0026791866,0.00092237355,0.00005418604,8.576432e-7,0.0000562523,0.85831434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996527,0.000019813686,0.00014924935,0.0006997203,0.002118768,0.0000037865398,4.8903695e-7,0.0000018119694,0.0004793625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999418,0.000036375313,0.000069324175,0.0000921561,0.00021302598,0.0001710886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99979794,0.000025122177,0.00002313166,0.000040520827,0.000070368296,0.000042926054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020283507,0.00003856423,0.00006057086,0.000012950004,0.0011804557,0.00007162236,0.00008026854,0.000029158498,0.00038533652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000070094604,0.00003493516,0.000026164851,0.00011847081,0.00077264506,0.00014446763,0.00003170528,0.00003312871,0.00033258644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004101431,0.000027749746,0.0052806055,4.584652e-7,0.000012075007,0.000003427183,0.0034829688,1.01004e-7,0.00012163422,0.97214335,0.0058554355,0.013068103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008050897,0.000023352517,0.018761896,0.000013194292,0.000008049439,2.9148012e-7,0.0027796861,0.0000012910996,0.00010355801,0.07098963,0.90714914,0.00008937513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050401906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90129375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046578498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012275658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.907923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802153528","doi":"10.5931/djim.v14i0.7872","title":"Peering into the Private Lives of Judges: Reconciling Judicial Accountability and Privacy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Argument (complex analysis); Harm; Political science; Economic Justice; Law; Diversity (politics); Public interest; Judicial review; Sociology","score_opus":0.025997220084521527,"score_gpt":0.33057027682282686,"score_spread":0.3045730567383053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802153528","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9498086,0.0005844625,0.00061397516,0.0032221933,0.00068368664,0.00020161811,0.0000015470457,0.0000127082185,0.04487121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99786717,0.00036823875,0.00080497435,0.00009965382,0.0007890579,0.0000037286668,2.6382597e-7,0.0000055038577,0.0000614369],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985615,0.00010993884,0.0005216218,0.00014828255,0.000464738,0.00019392652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989974,0.00012768165,0.0003676826,0.00014123948,0.00030349352,0.00006253945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001740463,0.00011267336,0.00025268004,0.00010367706,0.0010246827,0.00005590073,0.00045771792,0.000031120006,0.000058151883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011869318,0.00007711026,0.0001074534,0.00021573945,0.0014792557,0.00029214105,0.0011628077,0.00014608265,0.0000053090325],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011109872,0.0004322304,0.035637073,0.00019682478,0.0011750746,0.00007274273,0.7389859,0.000052121482,0.00041023278,0.072135165,0.0021225985,0.14766908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013636816,0.0014692994,0.1631369,0.0012116107,0.0005299963,0.000050501887,0.5411701,0.00009018224,0.00046696924,0.23578775,0.05411169,0.00061131385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028438692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00102301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19781578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011867295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006298388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7881134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802181875","doi":"","title":"Cruel, Unusual, and Constitutionally Infirm: Mandatory Minimum Sentences in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Philosophy; Psychology; Criminology","score_opus":0.03243567578332732,"score_gpt":0.32246164776872843,"score_spread":0.29002597198540114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802181875","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035043698,0.32723865,0.000004786265,0.003591214,0.0008037263,0.0004904184,0.00006514494,0.000017409764,0.63274497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87918204,0.11865214,0.000008710909,0.0019788903,0.00014543798,0.000011832974,0.0000064006267,0.0000018834593,0.00001268603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988785,0.000057923346,0.0003302409,0.00017270046,0.00034421892,0.0002164186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995253,0.00004482697,0.00011483058,0.000068285015,0.00014635811,0.000100415185],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044717966,0.00010830429,0.00029379147,0.000017080625,0.00046435065,0.000014203116,0.00010683575,0.000026790713,0.00003570785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035281344,0.0000798341,0.000030422712,0.0001445297,0.0027319363,0.00016173456,0.00007106,0.00008224569,0.0000034812977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047937724,0.000016999904,0.002292933,0.00045871333,0.0000116213105,0.0000015447233,0.00012925021,1.0201051e-8,9.732571e-7,0.9905446,0.0004645444,0.006074012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014899064,0.000026812599,0.0018394247,0.0034094877,0.00002136953,0.0000026773805,0.00043585806,7.445886e-7,0.0000068216964,0.0048960205,0.9890902,0.00012155936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87056404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9767562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9886257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015971459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001003079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802249588","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0043","title":"Canadian Constitutional Culture","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; State (computer science); Law; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03492128016532631,"score_gpt":0.23747456433561465,"score_spread":0.20255328417028834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802249588","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000016797125,0.0002126761,0.000022156977,0.0003003978,0.00045264413,0.00021200138,0.0004191439,0.00005413887,0.99832517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0053542578,0.0008490929,0.000031722666,0.000108206485,0.0004197906,4.603515e-7,0.000029476989,0.0000053253693,0.9932017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990293,0.000018927763,0.00007890172,0.0002562279,0.00032147573,0.0002951633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915886,0.000020817586,0.000119657605,0.00018159104,0.00021469039,0.00030435613],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008839988,0.00018331331,0.00021401007,0.00008438477,0.0038485911,0.00007959896,0.0005293172,0.00038388392,0.00015655885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002486575,0.00020627069,0.00014736204,0.0000027360472,0.003518765,0.0000997927,0.00012428947,0.00028618245,0.000009524671],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000092378505,0.000001754661,0.000016166394,0.0000029604703,0.00009172945,0.00013415748,0.00046192322,4.5343657e-7,1.4360869e-7,0.9846452,0.013338571,0.0012977205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119936216,0.00000775153,0.000009299455,0.000072608535,0.00008226803,0.000001807269,0.0001455394,1.8328119e-7,4.5024794e-7,0.023656541,0.9756579,0.00024575889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2583549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5262059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96231925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066817174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002403145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802924569","doi":"10.1017/9781108100007","title":"Vigilance and Restraint in the Common Law of Judicial Review","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Judicial review; Knight; Law; Commonwealth; Political science; Neutrality; Balance (ability); Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.03635546581907552,"score_gpt":0.2637874370845827,"score_spread":0.22743197126550718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802924569","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017759966,0.005180166,0.0000025028316,0.00027360988,0.00009763759,0.00040609806,0.00007311671,0.000014222768,0.99377507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029761778,0.021120787,0.000015381878,0.0015262627,0.00061654043,0.0000028285608,0.000018356146,0.000009813674,0.94692826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897885,0.00022401924,0.00014608547,0.00018536572,0.00030186598,0.00016383271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993985,0.00015818162,0.00014921547,0.00015003422,0.00010385111,0.00004018735],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004634016,0.00011959605,0.00032894203,0.00003120451,0.0004446262,0.000012713753,0.00039867708,0.00012530485,0.0000013166081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029545738,0.00010697266,0.00007267787,0.000023537144,0.0030089554,0.000041559353,0.00014649642,0.00021452436,0.0000017269607],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014677048,0.000006501164,0.0000097220955,0.00012561958,0.000018836894,0.000032692966,0.00038628178,1.8526416e-8,4.119944e-7,0.9323563,0.06679581,0.00025311497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011146848,0.000024390247,0.00014289435,0.0016499542,0.000086721826,0.0000013958643,0.00023511714,1.4403528e-7,0.00000165635,0.00081589,0.9968142,0.00011616214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012656147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030868168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9315404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001103222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029272618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803382897","doi":"10.22215/etd/2016-11285","title":"Potential Struggle Between the Legislative and Judicial Branches of Canada: A Contestational Approach to Interpreting the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Through Bedford &amp; PHS Community Services","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"BC Cancer Agency","keywords":"Charter; Legislature; Political science; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.022843034937842635,"score_gpt":0.2734031915610732,"score_spread":0.25056015662323056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2803382897","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.601388,0.00037189314,0.00012618136,0.0025942584,0.0002452983,0.00062579574,0.00071193324,0.0000074131535,0.39392924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989946,0.00001417639,0.0000603455,0.00018843949,0.00020274098,0.000022641787,0.00011068049,0.0000047457042,0.00040163277],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864656,0.00026383085,0.00028272634,0.00014615135,0.00043614715,0.00022460542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987044,0.000530635,0.00022426614,0.000100374134,0.0003565975,0.00008376987],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048106938,0.00015164848,0.00029790046,0.000039971008,0.0028058873,0.000045264926,0.00030792382,0.00010243,0.000024571082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000895682,0.000083376435,0.00004069915,0.00012252723,0.0010459173,0.000117542026,0.000051090155,0.00022055625,3.51745e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014028822,0.000045673598,0.01703563,0.00011453511,0.0008137101,5.762246e-7,0.62341386,0.000004031603,0.000053518586,0.35285178,0.0020440961,0.0034823176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008121466,0.00012749234,0.41854376,0.0010011574,0.0004597438,0.000001998092,0.27637908,0.000015109064,0.00018373318,0.2661221,0.035530247,0.00082343514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99907726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40150812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009647589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013636296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804124309","doi":"","title":"Le nouvel ordre constitutionnel canadien","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.01967552889521152,"score_gpt":0.23559407604154975,"score_spread":0.21591854714633824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804124309","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018214125,0.0038886142,0.00046680527,0.09127798,0.0025986482,0.00025989322,0.000019587851,0.000055064207,0.8832193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.929722,0.00044393225,0.00025434632,0.0016905931,0.00072526734,0.00003366463,0.0000025575318,0.0000037425536,0.06712385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987668,0.00006687746,0.00019810296,0.00021973647,0.0002525679,0.00049593847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928564,0.00007552993,0.000048070084,0.000088084555,0.00026090848,0.00024176145],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013452416,0.0001325615,0.00017579788,0.000032036845,0.0017512877,0.000073052855,0.00018772038,0.000120101126,0.005359793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010707334,0.00012910998,0.000080954786,0.00036400656,0.003689474,0.00044841386,0.00006878985,0.00011533786,0.004884752],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.802369e-7,0.00005596546,0.0016190255,0.0000035948174,0.00004418844,0.00000603228,0.0011844923,0.000009964299,0.000007376352,0.94061077,0.050265845,0.0061919917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019373691,0.000019486202,0.004074296,0.00003736346,0.000025215084,0.000007768872,0.017282283,0.00003118577,0.000011249551,0.118685335,0.85937953,0.0002525579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8873798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48560372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9115079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019403601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019609376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804520237","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Law in an Age of Proportionality","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":156,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Law; Political science; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.12257582338184182,"score_gpt":0.36662460773499816,"score_spread":0.24404878435315636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804520237","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14042956,0.00006164503,0.00022595166,0.0009543047,0.00012373578,0.000091689224,0.000006153155,0.000021142669,0.8580858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993313,0.0000035799549,0.0002681773,0.00018787141,0.00008456522,0.000005527076,0.000007470605,3.9643544e-7,0.00011113169],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932396,0.00005865248,0.00013273636,0.000078118406,0.00031192094,0.00009460052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996892,0.00002072049,0.000026522956,0.00003518527,0.00015835432,0.0000699742],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005130031,0.000031752676,0.00007892825,0.000012035358,0.00012968571,0.000008111203,0.00006873426,0.00002861657,0.0001033458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000106739055,0.000027237238,0.000017729284,0.00012197046,0.0031457292,0.00016459564,0.000017959632,0.000031662632,0.000013923608],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000746501,0.000074588104,0.057391364,5.67298e-7,0.0000024654728,0.0000042386155,0.00067064393,0.000010631962,0.000013022809,0.94163024,0.00007928567,0.000115486444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037106904,0.00004065672,0.04962947,0.0000117124755,0.000004813823,7.999544e-7,0.0054476336,0.0000037424415,0.000057148067,0.80581695,0.13849628,0.000119711985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034011874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08294802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85890174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057891186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041130924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804727763","doi":"10.5539/ijel.v8n5p106","title":"Interface Between National Ideologies and the Constitution of Pakistan","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of English Linguistics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Constitution; Politics; Democracy; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03317931734761564,"score_gpt":0.3680183507725566,"score_spread":0.334839033424941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804727763","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041830894,0.0012330987,0.0026627597,0.0013612165,0.019938294,0.00013887776,0.000074733696,0.000024469502,0.9327357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842998,0.00025400365,0.00041208958,0.000091010945,0.014911475,6.04989e-7,9.923202e-7,0.0000016954713,0.000028334516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986748,0.00009066967,0.00040172128,0.00006147217,0.0006848129,0.000086512286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9719626,0.000819856,0.00037371196,0.000030817875,0.026776737,0.00003629584],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012572006,0.000059434155,0.00015870098,0.000076869626,0.0002252257,0.000048072456,0.0003105561,0.000044767043,0.000028465327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.092507035,0.000041900505,0.0000613197,0.00008263732,0.003976314,0.000061186256,0.00007777555,0.00012438442,0.0000018209347],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000115176306,0.000015602043,0.0075411065,0.0000012697928,0.00015567274,0.0000014265652,0.0031812135,0.00001092286,0.0000024766123,0.9864968,0.0020207895,0.00045754603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011704281,0.00008573518,0.0061425418,0.00009101523,0.000070880335,0.0000013279226,0.006320775,0.000007765776,0.00024682432,0.22514477,0.76062256,0.000095351934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003502269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017745492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9424689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008115578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035692847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2805163191","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0009","title":"Parliamentary Sovereignty in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliamentary sovereignty; Parliament; Statute; Political science; Sovereignty; Law; Context (archaeology); Popular sovereignty; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.03430705599024367,"score_gpt":0.22165235385963605,"score_spread":0.18734529786939239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2805163191","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011211724,0.00012693877,0.0000017332649,0.00009903408,0.000300604,0.00019150885,0.00014641536,0.000017634426,0.999004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.051478874,0.0009939221,0.000012370993,0.00010990901,0.0001662854,5.101315e-7,0.000009558714,0.0000074475133,0.9472211],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990526,0.000023510986,0.00009499694,0.00022916563,0.00035538178,0.000244352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999496,0.000044729943,0.00013570192,0.00017211797,0.000053300104,0.00009816557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007474757,0.00015429029,0.00023807673,0.00004190935,0.0008994463,0.000025827238,0.0004589185,0.00012958843,0.00013027374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009131431,0.00018386451,0.000071388145,0.0000023437842,0.00050805666,0.00007561323,0.00021786519,0.00023235471,8.083725e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023965438,0.0000024406743,0.0002094809,0.0000043872797,0.00005096135,0.00021324176,0.00021918298,0.0000013579294,5.7153912e-8,0.9910621,0.002987007,0.005225841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016659456,0.0000052264577,0.00015054623,0.00008386156,0.0000359861,2.8484692e-7,0.0006760181,6.721576e-7,7.038943e-7,0.018328719,0.98034525,0.00020612152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99103755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9773583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014005442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027006953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7497777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2805463457","doi":"10.22456/0104-6594.69963","title":"Direito indigenista nas constituições de Brasil e Canadá: um estudo comparado","year":2017,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista da Faculdade de Direito","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina; Memorial University of Newfoundland","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06845008946806487,"score_gpt":0.3559539645207794,"score_spread":0.2875038750527145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2805463457","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6458706,0.022557389,0.00040288936,0.015043383,0.0028902965,0.0017941105,0.0016567212,0.00036161373,0.309423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897447,0.002042618,0.00010295143,0.0009103343,0.0016237503,0.000073750685,0.000056169825,0.000044033677,0.0054016793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945062,0.00049912825,0.0008673582,0.001016532,0.0012305876,0.0018802425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965087,0.000321966,0.0008122698,0.001037865,0.0003418607,0.000977328],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012890565,0.00074835186,0.0012370785,0.00013663915,0.00988895,0.002548144,0.002208164,0.00045190295,0.00030044816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001520817,0.00076505146,0.0005046025,0.00035501056,0.0043361387,0.00054242223,0.0006536284,0.0007107178,0.00048053553],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010004667,0.0003405768,0.39943963,0.00021175742,0.00076532626,0.0006280316,0.0081311865,0.00002183474,0.00045833952,0.5387892,0.0456816,0.005432468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072431203,0.000072812945,0.19210269,0.00063432334,0.00043063876,0.000034309072,0.0044804052,0.00003515018,0.00016571427,0.0016584671,0.79856807,0.0010930978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14708498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034757555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7528865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012247396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035452633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99948007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2805665929","doi":"10.5539/ass.v14n6p71","title":"Parliamentary Immunity in International Legislation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Social Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Constitution; Duty; Legislation; Sovereign immunity; Law; Political science; Executive branch; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.029922659885101552,"score_gpt":0.33443072638148863,"score_spread":0.30450806649638706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2805665929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07187905,0.000013465813,0.00006369201,0.007578996,0.0008536222,0.000075549666,0.000002558234,0.000027540125,0.91950554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99838394,0.00001539933,0.000092841925,0.0003637163,0.0010175604,0.0000056569907,0.0000011560179,0.0000013166781,0.0001184402],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988911,0.000054773653,0.00010869064,0.00015133565,0.00053960894,0.00025444795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970484,0.000018756491,0.00004220773,0.000041785905,0.00014705016,0.000045362525],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008631569,0.00004591788,0.00006001387,0.00008221632,0.0020302455,0.00007874259,0.0003903342,0.00003219954,0.0002175178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001856774,0.00004751941,0.000023253147,0.00080034015,0.0042036218,0.0005314405,0.00009009744,0.0000739144,0.0000822839],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010597986,0.000051753384,0.028959893,2.3027594e-7,0.00000482237,0.0000020265968,0.041250505,4.623247e-8,0.00033656385,0.68123573,0.00061682164,0.247531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016745098,0.000020298743,0.77861154,0.000010013152,0.0000026586026,3.057971e-7,0.038574085,0.000004111638,0.000087483495,0.07494992,0.107436895,0.00013523945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020609552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01790026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92650485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031379896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003485069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99926895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2805689105","doi":"10.29173/alr1437","title":"Special Issue on Judicial Appointments - Foreword","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.025530403015421782,"score_gpt":0.3136804387163318,"score_spread":0.28815003570091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2805689105","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00032821923,0.006486903,2.1901202e-7,0.012961693,0.0006638007,0.0004236652,0.0000038386793,0.000022612761,0.97910905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12284357,0.5147281,0.00010993036,0.14511724,0.11504041,0.00035776827,0.00006170059,0.00005460298,0.10168668],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874115,0.000113343725,0.00023540737,0.00022320737,0.0003827481,0.00030412697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995422,0.00013886683,0.000048696034,0.0001306341,0.000037902213,0.00010170166],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024126268,0.00012924649,0.00029494168,0.000010800759,0.00086890906,0.000028069762,0.0002099436,0.000051432027,0.0265364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012157339,0.00010843361,0.00013412934,0.00022027081,0.00045315112,0.000110888875,0.000021961296,0.00009208123,0.009166319],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009067254,0.00004609264,0.000041604555,0.000021832268,0.000021675207,0.0000029644648,0.00019013874,1.487693e-7,4.6469804e-8,0.6978758,0.13785212,0.16393852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009662605,0.00003721812,0.000101975136,0.0006993879,0.00004593502,6.9431496e-7,0.000017593877,6.7025475e-8,0.0000010888989,0.010370807,0.98849654,0.00013207886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048613966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05460004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8774224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006430937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000076181845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99160516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806114163","doi":"10.24908/fede.v19i1.10746","title":"Elected Judges Lead to Less Partial Judges","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federalism-E","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Separation of powers; Political science; Legislature; Judicial independence; Government (linguistics); Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.05819917273402697,"score_gpt":0.33277306278094326,"score_spread":0.2745738900469163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2806114163","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63387513,0.00018555939,0.00022997391,0.040867135,0.0010097427,0.00025302818,0.000011132941,0.00023778541,0.3233305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905946,0.000027666025,0.00014948832,0.00390785,0.0027288804,0.00002859793,0.000004568308,0.0000067019014,0.0025516297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987413,0.000095665586,0.00014390054,0.00024020739,0.00035302585,0.0004258447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943405,0.000054926564,0.000034844725,0.00009899429,0.00024431964,0.00013288042],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021178111,0.00010795177,0.00015551383,0.00004412315,0.0020810533,0.00014002268,0.00020935075,0.00007209136,0.00043595966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029491572,0.00009891559,0.000052783762,0.000333486,0.00063050905,0.00012542684,0.00007591575,0.00007230171,0.0010006956],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000929002,0.00010675651,0.028810788,0.0000036735873,0.000084560495,0.000013030572,0.0180328,0.0000024036647,0.0011998616,0.70782924,0.22835903,0.015464958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020710424,0.000107611886,0.023082087,0.000015808744,0.000017577018,9.935443e-7,0.003961667,0.0000035000066,0.0015339527,0.0142400805,0.9565431,0.00028652954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011225191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039073832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72818404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008667362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016757025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806530565","doi":"10.31581/jbs-27.3.4(2017)","title":"Race, Place, and Clusters","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Bahá’í Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metropolitan area; Framing (construction); Race (biology); Political science; Sociology; Geography; Gender studies","score_opus":0.06667821448390411,"score_gpt":0.3680923250305668,"score_spread":0.30141411054666273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2806530565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7853073,0.03994701,0.000045068886,0.08032288,0.0016569033,0.00014435593,0.0000028424033,0.000012548747,0.09256112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97122896,0.027308974,0.000050908016,0.00022571828,0.00059582025,7.832967e-7,1.3017115e-8,0.000002065304,0.00058675045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926114,0.00008578292,0.00016944534,0.000045023833,0.00029431251,0.00014427255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989587,0.00034763062,0.00031999056,0.00008639724,0.00024298806,0.00004426581],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014026585,0.000065754386,0.00020610885,0.00002543382,0.0041271606,0.00006304882,0.0002953297,0.000021088976,0.000006880778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001060938,0.00003679752,0.000047356178,0.000032825537,0.0022221084,0.00022485721,0.00017345406,0.00011511414,0.0000059462327],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009896421,0.00018041501,0.10144612,0.000054823537,0.0040692426,0.000121594916,0.29177338,0.00008672597,0.00019347024,0.34855172,0.19679886,0.055733975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016450618,0.00031504658,0.19999325,0.00037499506,0.00060822215,0.0000741533,0.24056864,0.0000064996593,0.0000586906,0.111928396,0.44404143,0.00038560273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005496176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018169608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24724257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036967103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000076156226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809002756","doi":"10.1515/lehr-2018-0006","title":"The Reductionism of Global Models of Constitutional Rights","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Ethics of Human Rights","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Reductionism; Political science; Constitutional law; Democracy; Human rights; Law; Law and economics; Decolonization; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06816947780697191,"score_gpt":0.3650034817554437,"score_spread":0.2968340039484718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809002756","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15666363,0.00044962327,0.0002950064,0.0022342396,0.00084880827,0.00019239141,0.000061839455,0.000026898759,0.83922756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99925727,0.000025514282,0.00014044538,0.000037527672,0.00034584908,0.0000032545684,0.0000019895178,0.0000011298401,0.00018700983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984681,0.00015480252,0.00034685674,0.00013754853,0.0007187824,0.00017391334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983625,0.00023611987,0.00021859097,0.00014322008,0.0009944645,0.000045094494],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000774183,0.00008171605,0.00018908459,0.000009778478,0.0045767194,0.000014754538,0.00030323942,0.0001511852,0.000048514074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043288004,0.000053845004,0.00009694373,0.00014417051,0.032297436,0.00014421625,0.000052566844,0.00016863395,0.000006662776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015720845,0.00005077274,0.00003439477,0.00000461694,0.000055025863,3.258471e-7,0.0017914631,0.000008496409,0.000085960535,0.9976991,0.0002444767,0.000009659809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012029218,0.000056222954,0.0001257939,0.00004894119,0.000025436015,6.214954e-7,0.00020188697,0.000002490299,0.0017870906,0.96265674,0.034910396,0.00006407896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041443236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12712008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84259367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005243229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036839128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809293198","doi":"10.1515/lehr-2018-0003","title":"Opting Out of “Global Constitutionalism”","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Ethics of Human Rights","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Society of Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"Boston College","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Convergence (economics); Nullification; Dissent; Constitutional review; Political science; Law and economics; Constitutional law; Law; Democracy; Politics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.09030422232899524,"score_gpt":0.4006400749678313,"score_spread":0.310335852638836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809293198","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16593602,0.00014412668,0.000089190195,0.0013609501,0.0005863634,0.000096502146,0.00003309711,0.00003367174,0.83172005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99887514,0.0000072367097,0.00027914674,0.00019306868,0.0004961299,0.0000019770175,0.0000025402073,0.0000014509567,0.00014332304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876094,0.000113957634,0.0002545006,0.00013673816,0.000556379,0.00017749173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988811,0.0001791875,0.00014143549,0.00009372124,0.0006527376,0.000051845866],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000719094,0.000074615244,0.00017919397,0.000009349397,0.0023386849,0.000014090305,0.0002180658,0.00014639375,0.00015065017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011469116,0.000063322295,0.000073189076,0.00009976304,0.010368273,0.00010654341,0.000059001086,0.00016021261,0.00003259289],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053371887,0.000034504228,0.00059520995,0.000006167613,0.000030571045,0.0000010476122,0.0035627806,6.460128e-7,0.00011366055,0.9954762,0.000162792,0.000011087718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012426887,0.000045213095,0.0005934383,0.00007876369,0.00002087809,2.4063223e-7,0.00034098374,3.117601e-7,0.0008633954,0.9225998,0.075247236,0.00008548131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032752097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20372383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8329391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050725055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027087904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99896014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809595885","doi":"10.29173/alr1396","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada and the Alberta Court of Appeal: Do the Top Courts Have a Fundamental Philosophical Difference of Opinion on Public Law Issues","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta; University of Windsor","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Majority opinion; Concurring opinion; Law of the case; Court of record; Political science; Precedent; Remand (court procedure); Original jurisdiction; Criticism; Sociology","score_opus":0.0412686788878519,"score_gpt":0.3062020892189442,"score_spread":0.2649334103310923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809595885","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01627544,0.15509956,0.0000010653976,0.5445736,0.00041557653,0.0014721864,0.000032809352,0.0000066288717,0.28212312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9093096,0.0881955,0.0000011969812,0.0020800473,0.00010806169,0.000029279194,0.0000031789345,0.0000042899437,0.00026879285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980997,0.00036574877,0.00043352778,0.00017241105,0.00067535485,0.00025327824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970805,0.0021323676,0.0002676982,0.00027337312,0.00017752501,0.00006852497],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087797764,0.00014150597,0.00045525853,0.0000065687223,0.0009021069,0.000032896078,0.00046218286,0.000042956282,0.00007044204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048782155,0.00006538354,0.0001079582,0.00013804184,0.0036238253,0.000060556715,0.00011695939,0.00012606934,0.0000016611091],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031293028,0.00003988805,0.0022000796,0.000060294038,0.00007783124,2.7240063e-7,0.0004845201,2.5828746e-7,8.3687e-7,0.9949533,0.001272281,0.00087914796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030587838,0.0000512893,0.002403855,0.0010331977,0.000067747336,0.00000299824,0.00042767226,0.0000047023077,0.000004446867,0.03816466,0.95742255,0.00011098619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9364096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96755475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95678866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044932076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002642163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99908775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2868729165","doi":"10.1007/978-981-13-1023-2_1","title":"What Is Responsive Judging?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ius gentium","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Acknowledgement; Field (mathematics); Accountability; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics; Computer security","score_opus":0.03999780980906574,"score_gpt":0.3066927143896824,"score_spread":0.2666949045806166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2868729165","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014765619,0.0075394497,0.000008312001,0.0046585156,0.0050972067,0.00021846105,0.000043039377,0.0000734603,0.9822139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0040867543,0.008217929,0.000033972923,0.0022617285,0.002716953,0.000008585005,0.000009662471,0.000018741886,0.9826457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853647,0.000029134068,0.00019346505,0.00034658564,0.00059117604,0.0003031919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914545,0.000069994494,0.00013505976,0.0001817079,0.00036145264,0.000106339416],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026977962,0.00019773324,0.0002543636,0.00008834879,0.0009954651,0.0001814934,0.00026864975,0.0002732852,0.007752651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049500548,0.00019671874,0.00019180407,0.00004285851,0.0013982796,0.00020189332,0.00013874995,0.00016975311,0.0047913976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024708055,0.000008123952,0.00001981253,0.000004676013,0.00014259154,0.000031049087,0.007101172,4.8452577e-8,0.0000039639394,0.7758479,0.2140476,0.002768351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045283592,0.000017058392,0.000027022603,0.000109285305,0.00004857509,8.1795076e-7,0.00093434023,1.0095963e-7,0.000008517516,0.22705813,0.7715642,0.00018671637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007624177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020031882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5575166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013833029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042094028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883228411","doi":"10.2478/bjals-2019-0014","title":"“Felix Cohen Was the Blackstone of Federal Indian Law:” Taking the Comparison Seriously","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of American Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Jurisprudence; Law; Scholarship; Politics; Legal history; Civil servant; Legal education; Common law; Political science; Servant; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.025935630180175015,"score_gpt":0.3256007071614473,"score_spread":0.29966507698127226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883228411","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93168354,0.01754178,0.000009520678,0.010731233,0.00068767456,0.0002227947,0.000010657752,0.000012958097,0.039099827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950986,0.0031649466,0.000063302134,0.0009205566,0.0005743175,0.000003907586,2.8368515e-7,0.000006692841,0.00016737508],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980273,0.00029494375,0.00050949043,0.00011823127,0.0007394037,0.00031062213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979018,0.00040640577,0.0009872006,0.00008011321,0.00056605134,0.00005840378],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009555947,0.00011851769,0.00057077256,0.000029366454,0.0017938827,0.00016313279,0.00046130645,0.000025070238,0.000044840745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000413258,0.00007901813,0.00019507272,0.0003490733,0.00494963,0.00023253067,0.00013488988,0.00036090898,0.0000111538175],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052054494,0.00065448025,0.22641833,0.00007509951,0.005711377,0.00052487786,0.20702377,0.00071902573,0.0003288626,0.25124,0.04373472,0.26304892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086354883,0.0007146117,0.24462165,0.00062830356,0.00019698264,0.0003660611,0.5000615,0.000003754871,0.00006873897,0.0035211777,0.2485511,0.0004025584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11280081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050238788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29303774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001103613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019702985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99950564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885068581","doi":"10.1163/2211906x-00702004","title":"Canada and Israel in Comparative Constitutional Perspective: The (Sometimes Overlooked) Legal Historical Dimension of Globalization","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université Laval; Université de Montréal; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Constitutionalism; State (computer science); Politics; Political science; Federalism; Population; Democracy; Law; Political economy; Sociology","score_opus":0.029289094815552905,"score_gpt":0.3259439891792664,"score_spread":0.2966548943637135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885068581","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71732366,0.0060151606,0.0007881373,0.0055464255,0.0010843931,0.00025620777,0.00006458672,0.0000065265012,0.26891488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992665,0.000057131747,0.00010489623,0.00029883516,0.00023877545,9.2565716e-7,5.680894e-7,6.956791e-7,0.000031689287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984872,0.0002648453,0.00035975454,0.00010896557,0.0006162231,0.00016304184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983482,0.00016035263,0.00029094543,0.00004364485,0.0010786606,0.00007821241],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032375357,0.00010341248,0.0003500988,0.000027012427,0.00051417155,0.000026109927,0.00015697899,0.000036026835,0.000020968164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000611331,0.0000730472,0.000050558392,0.00037269495,0.0037770148,0.00023207617,0.00004469006,0.00010918489,0.0000015061914],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014648368,0.00005917203,0.0127189625,9.2677203e-7,0.00006203702,0.000007203695,0.001640549,0.0000693084,0.000020874142,0.97944057,0.0058148205,0.000019101588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024419527,0.0007724004,0.18967682,0.00027249826,0.00016488995,0.00014119822,0.051637135,0.00012165032,0.00036864297,0.24613963,0.5077563,0.00050687854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7664159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88094294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7333009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001584017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00176587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99893415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885224434","doi":"","title":"LESSONS FROM LATIF: GUIDANCE ON THE USE OF SOCIAL SCIENCE EXPERT EVIDENCE IN DISCRIMINATION CASES","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Circumstantial evidence; Prima facie; Supreme court; Relevance (law); Spell; Respondent; Psychology; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.38240717373339045,"score_gpt":0.4173266072963282,"score_spread":0.03491943356293775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885224434","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05767362,0.082714,0.000010404577,0.79902834,0.0007377147,0.0013174372,0.00011230176,0.000021464652,0.058384728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820674,0.01114957,0.000013226902,0.0064595626,0.00019214256,0.000023442848,5.508417e-7,0.0000018807066,0.000092198774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895144,0.00022939642,0.00014530333,0.00012981129,0.00034398882,0.00020008636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990823,0.00047591704,0.00006956773,0.00013503872,0.000177222,0.000059942264],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010625913,0.000057534362,0.000120510376,0.000031567466,0.0018360832,0.000047901947,0.00040325287,0.000019191615,0.00018120285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034030974,0.000033237626,0.000034477453,0.00052241,0.0030257418,0.00018844844,0.000031518044,0.00006263975,0.00004718953],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021525702,0.0000054333846,0.0005038192,0.000009051803,0.0000037589023,0.0000022255147,0.0060834554,1.8785325e-7,0.000016333071,0.96550417,0.010651534,0.0172179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000314503,0.000022090688,0.058677435,0.00394697,0.00002517157,5.155159e-7,0.0012132432,0.000006435093,0.000043004668,0.00656835,0.92932993,0.00013542244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.76007354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9369955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9589358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030519205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010926685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885645251","doi":"","title":"Decision-Making in the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of New Brunswick Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.01821947210498014,"score_gpt":0.25327202656104153,"score_spread":0.23505255445606138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885645251","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6466133,0.00045159052,0.0033385109,0.006231482,0.00040004138,0.00008944493,0.0000023260786,0.00000439835,0.34286892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991883,0.00007675273,0.00041565113,0.00012966435,0.00009854007,1.0758092e-9,6.264254e-8,7.5167173e-7,0.00009024697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991559,0.000044251025,0.000117267315,0.00004642393,0.0004763621,0.00015983054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937075,0.00031064454,0.00010523157,0.000039373605,0.00011685459,0.00005717099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081920216,0.00003603421,0.00009703507,0.000036248133,0.0008385577,0.000006852229,0.00029738658,0.000027252216,0.00010701955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000086626766,0.000031184245,0.00004451373,0.00018491584,0.00033976126,0.00009108424,0.000027719445,0.00012006132,6.563893e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011642416,0.0000413569,0.032181825,0.0000016712731,0.00003239219,0.00018577364,0.0131476475,0.00008440316,0.000008045466,0.9381012,0.009096651,0.0070026424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065240293,0.00004458585,0.2653562,0.00020589508,0.000032178665,0.000028173488,0.13728832,0.0000041500393,0.000010762451,0.053210456,0.54303545,0.00013141362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9562532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88489074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014852166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002302567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6449593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885667638","doi":"","title":"Gender, consciousness raising, and decision making on the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judicature","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Raising (metalworking); Supreme court; Consciousness; Law; Political science; Supreme Court Decisions; Psychology; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.024224183832104854,"score_gpt":0.2892925316604149,"score_spread":0.26506834782831007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885667638","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85401165,0.0007078215,0.00005434791,0.0140044885,0.0010131063,0.00017018321,0.000020729156,0.000018663322,0.12999903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99872726,0.000057845104,0.000075066324,0.0009081147,0.00019291823,0.0000031428124,3.889855e-7,0.000002396909,0.00003284567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922335,0.000027114378,0.00008894041,0.00011229853,0.00039800862,0.00015027841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929076,0.00042702217,0.000059712867,0.000092790135,0.00008597081,0.000043763634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032402936,0.000058565096,0.000095052965,0.000015499973,0.0008628474,0.000020464904,0.00015466592,0.00007099279,0.00009282852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048352158,0.00003797664,0.00002116502,0.00011947564,0.0006400613,0.000025811174,0.0000420744,0.0002154608,0.0000015321226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002461856,0.000019547158,0.0107917655,0.0000029302284,0.000026537748,0.000005136812,0.0018127288,0.0000018963063,0.00031787346,0.922341,0.056748185,0.007907794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024771443,0.000019483776,0.18083507,0.000104578794,0.000032959328,0.0000045966212,0.0038176607,0.000009503228,0.00017346938,0.3410309,0.47349143,0.00023265848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12793578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8107089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6827731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002382239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058102235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87787133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886473766","doi":"10.1111/jels.12186","title":"A Rose by Any Other Name: Understanding Judicial Decisions that Do Not Cite Precedent","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"CITES; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Judicial opinion; Foundation (evidence); Phenomenon; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2462212841917908,"score_gpt":0.43611650463903234,"score_spread":0.18989522044724155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886473766","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6009174,0.041203268,0.008526387,0.122055106,0.009555752,0.0007134685,0.000107992906,0.00014485535,0.21677579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925624,0.0025223584,0.00017835067,0.0018461684,0.0024367443,0.000004034176,1.9028226e-7,0.000010114401,0.00043960672],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997369,0.00020012792,0.00052821817,0.0002151878,0.0012225611,0.00046492898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979333,0.00082229485,0.0003665966,0.000085933956,0.00057333906,0.0002184854],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001132176,0.00019133496,0.00051277794,0.00011167179,0.0021830937,0.00016791662,0.00031939134,0.000103395505,0.0001471809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020632965,0.00013679269,0.00025363136,0.00040319987,0.0021987588,0.00041416328,0.00017101821,0.00029710412,0.000047895533],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010024175,0.0006348021,0.078830115,0.000009266404,0.002024083,0.00011702877,0.043279815,0.000008374641,0.00032493114,0.22430082,0.6427553,0.0067130057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007783044,0.00056508905,0.006670892,0.00027242085,0.00017153811,0.000017317183,0.032987103,0.0000021813116,0.00014227247,0.06104758,0.89701515,0.0003301452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006855258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022754718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39164507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066989363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028929047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99911594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886525649","doi":"10.29173/alr1433","title":"The Gifted Judge: An Analysis of the Judicial Career of Robert H. Jackson","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Civil liberties; Judicial review; Judicial activism; Doctrine; Democracy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.023169469039569474,"score_gpt":0.3018971805913199,"score_spread":0.27872771155175047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886525649","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07517856,0.1284127,0.0000015924137,0.020355446,0.00030335877,0.00078107906,0.000025838746,0.000015483647,0.77492595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94797105,0.049315933,0.0000036747783,0.0016518383,0.00008029897,0.00001662731,0.0000043344526,0.0000032287921,0.0009530004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862593,0.00030867066,0.00033847414,0.00013694794,0.00041277986,0.00017718208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906653,0.00031026822,0.00014329953,0.0002793926,0.00015757684,0.000042952834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005521446,0.00008439809,0.00037965516,0.000012220971,0.0007916674,0.000012689317,0.0004432389,0.00003921906,0.00071550853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002319304,0.000044986875,0.0003096808,0.001079892,0.0011351167,0.00007469544,0.000036873105,0.000064228785,0.000016880227],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000928415,0.000058494417,0.0054741874,0.000040690993,0.00048298677,2.3506809e-7,0.0010858343,0.000014098602,0.00000402537,0.9558062,0.0017672946,0.035256688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004998474,0.000016549573,0.015275943,0.0003210311,0.0015081081,1.7292302e-7,0.000118518365,0.0000067868523,0.000009833744,0.002390166,0.9802135,0.00008936522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2445237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4571502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97844625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025131114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010908628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78343165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886663949","doi":"","title":"Judicial Attitudes to Judicial Review: A Comparative Examination of Justifications Offered for Restricting the Scope of Judicial Review in Australia, Canada and England","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Judicial review; Scope (computer science); Vitality; Judicial activism; Political science; Law; Judicial opinion","score_opus":0.051672408473930974,"score_gpt":0.36101925479880553,"score_spread":0.3093468463248746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886663949","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92088366,0.06533467,0.0001304345,0.009649522,0.0005211747,0.0016460588,0.00004149703,0.0000070995457,0.0017858661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9298722,0.069396526,0.000039883213,0.00018773317,0.0004160954,0.00003958112,0.0000035529931,0.0000035118464,0.000040885112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980247,0.0002298292,0.0005411893,0.00015309431,0.0004272048,0.0006239745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864966,0.00038003144,0.0003655077,0.00008148451,0.00046048692,0.00006283093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035732638,0.000108044995,0.00039343347,0.00006840532,0.00061731506,0.000013478812,0.00024405158,0.000047361333,0.000011016312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001607772,0.0000848205,0.000058644415,0.0005057323,0.00034893825,0.000090608904,0.000030415047,0.00061863835,5.873466e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016660044,0.00023058474,0.007694272,0.00059556396,0.0003078247,0.0000020691564,0.006423461,0.000017263417,0.0018306846,0.9118613,0.0036223289,0.067248024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0045077847,0.0016837404,0.60654855,0.019440401,0.0019513853,0.00009907406,0.020436754,0.000020751346,0.0008978019,0.2350884,0.10769903,0.0016263596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46032497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9830732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67677295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030379934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043208837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7665062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887302706","doi":"10.29173/alr1438","title":"Special Issue on Judicial Appointments - Introduction","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Government; Strong; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.01912355025449905,"score_gpt":0.30007410492534775,"score_spread":0.28095055467084873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887302706","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029978924,0.004570558,2.2663379e-7,0.03903225,0.0013029298,0.00035578702,0.0000021770961,0.000023045612,0.95441324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05324868,0.38964438,0.00007624878,0.06693236,0.39816907,0.00023458293,0.00007423152,0.000039146595,0.0915813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998834,0.00014351387,0.0002124984,0.00023463868,0.00033869682,0.00023661689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963975,0.00007223802,0.000046548983,0.00012422258,0.000043144635,0.00007409017],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028431654,0.00010971993,0.00024229386,0.000011606662,0.00080252683,0.000025302888,0.0001439283,0.00004298612,0.029525662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014228295,0.00009483089,0.00009616463,0.0002252266,0.00039564702,0.00012645003,0.0000150678425,0.00008737511,0.008736467],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009005889,0.0000446258,0.000014264002,0.000016957769,0.000017541173,0.0000011664744,0.0001464035,3.4039726e-7,1.8308519e-7,0.60809773,0.25780645,0.13384533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007600841,0.000034248744,0.000071312315,0.00027888748,0.000043679775,9.626422e-7,0.00001822274,5.4551897e-8,0.0000025354025,0.0049498524,0.9944137,0.000110585504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036212828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022216452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86283195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000076606164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057128404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99562556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888075018","doi":"10.1017/s0008423918000434","title":"Judicial Discretion as Political Choice: The Supreme Court of Canada's Costs Awarding Power","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Discretion; Politics; Economic Justice; Power (physics); Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Economics; Business","score_opus":0.018854971755263364,"score_gpt":0.3060579583647822,"score_spread":0.2872029866095189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888075018","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64093286,0.00011218103,0.00019445557,0.07852476,0.0022870693,0.00013207924,0.00004297558,0.000005174314,0.27776846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969347,0.0000015658424,0.000022329907,0.0018099741,0.001157449,6.9805293e-7,1.3694086e-7,0.0000030646079,0.000070064365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99691385,0.000104055485,0.00033003275,0.00013659518,0.0011317377,0.0013837061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99631006,0.00028994057,0.000109349145,0.00009853016,0.0011116305,0.002080519],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016193464,0.00008961835,0.00018532349,0.00011688353,0.0021998954,0.0000948631,0.0006808468,0.000050733903,0.00035607987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054034665,0.000063697604,0.000071173614,0.0005759711,0.011028648,0.00023129463,0.000029659464,0.0002000763,0.000008820974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003917361,0.000005282314,0.006812696,5.9153996e-7,0.000008139872,0.000013891393,0.0004069404,4.2666557e-7,0.000045896253,0.9914254,0.0011369396,0.00013986618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033458517,0.0003724885,0.73508877,0.00019211927,0.00007320767,0.00009699634,0.021583935,0.000019993993,0.0011360158,0.1591544,0.081576675,0.0003708059],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98768157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98954135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83227104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020848429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03342911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888288850","doi":"10.1016/j.postcomstud.2018.06.002","title":"Authoritarian constitutionalism in Putin’s Russia: A pragmatic constitutional court in a dual state","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communist and Post-Communist Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Authoritarianism; Constitutional court; Law; State (computer science); Political science; Dual (grammatical number); Subordination (linguistics); Politics; Autonomy; Constitutional law; Sociology; Law and economics; Democracy; Constitution; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.040466349490957926,"score_gpt":0.34570135322573303,"score_spread":0.3052350037347751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888288850","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45089677,0.026531167,0.00010374018,0.06989929,0.0018969076,0.00138721,0.00034608683,0.00023097827,0.44870785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950095,0.003255441,0.00041550904,0.0007263646,0.00019497125,0.000085559695,0.00004479663,0.000007534321,0.00026035152],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99723285,0.0008624114,0.00060737075,0.00026977962,0.0004355946,0.00059197046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99805105,0.0009995837,0.00014772324,0.00033809978,0.00033925517,0.00012426198],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019471518,0.00029723984,0.0005853571,0.00024445273,0.0054778317,0.00013448232,0.00038323854,0.0001254725,0.000054034233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008730976,0.0002831434,0.00007278439,0.0005447141,0.023174426,0.00030391512,0.0007037133,0.0005790939,0.000051512532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008702305,0.00021041877,0.02286882,0.000021939897,0.000120117336,0.000060145863,0.039617967,0.0000014479751,0.000019851364,0.935384,0.0008406601,0.0007676178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003516938,0.00035894525,0.17399003,0.0013034528,0.000099416524,0.00010250469,0.16773051,0.00006302921,0.000009971415,0.32419285,0.3274211,0.0012112648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02746752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17552799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61119115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003322106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078314124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889205059","doi":"","title":"ARABS, MUSLIMS, HUMAN RIGHTS, ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND INSTITUTIONAL TRUSTWORTHINESS: INSIGHTS FROM THIRTEEN LEGAL NARRATIVES","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Narrative; International human rights law; Sociology","score_opus":0.05362550134991011,"score_gpt":0.3380005040823064,"score_spread":0.2843750027323963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889205059","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11090685,0.12821846,0.000048352824,0.18306637,0.0015276943,0.001890802,0.00017328626,0.000092640425,0.5740755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98056084,0.003459528,0.000046659203,0.014044835,0.0015591214,0.000042540705,0.000016723854,0.0000047174426,0.00026505356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875987,0.00020498777,0.00020539905,0.00024927442,0.0003024328,0.0002780147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991334,0.000064380605,0.000060070164,0.00015989455,0.00021051038,0.00037173196],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003300865,0.00014143673,0.00024736952,0.000053839085,0.0069691017,0.00019063558,0.00049414666,0.000055358858,0.00046564298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015881563,0.00009344088,0.000044714827,0.00041507412,0.0016667867,0.0003448022,0.000078302866,0.00013636219,0.00020488021],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024878887,0.0000055653595,0.00014785428,0.000030331608,0.00003766266,0.000011960678,0.004279596,3.5203564e-7,0.0000016229482,0.9785628,0.015115824,0.0018039681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005830687,0.000014581871,0.010634138,0.0006175913,0.000094925424,0.0000016316986,0.00040113967,5.5731323e-7,0.0000010986544,0.03525089,0.95277053,0.00015460505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7506079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98341453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94331187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020546386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008655207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9943237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889272343","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0033","title":"The hydraulics of constitutional claims: Multiplicity of actors in constitutional interpretation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional theory; Democracy; Political science; Sociology; Constitutional law; Law; Meaning (existential); Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Epistemology; History","score_opus":0.014521814287404579,"score_gpt":0.2579335399891207,"score_spread":0.24341172570171615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889272343","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21530956,0.0010309651,0.011759384,0.0009660096,0.0009235602,0.00021231575,0.000056904777,0.000011698316,0.7697296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99910545,0.00039977147,0.00035126595,0.000017148483,0.00009576378,5.4475283e-8,9.124984e-7,5.965487e-7,0.00002901977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991409,0.00011210369,0.00020601718,0.00006872427,0.0003487594,0.00012347527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892396,0.00020104974,0.00025155512,0.000047301968,0.0005259461,0.000050184954],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049408275,0.000053210053,0.00014339418,0.000020721318,0.0011042258,0.0000075274434,0.00023245954,0.000055355133,0.00017787685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001306972,0.000047213358,0.000088134635,0.000059162634,0.016045975,0.00030678976,0.00005057797,0.000086445616,0.0000017889249],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001633169,0.00006026755,0.009426483,0.0000022709814,0.00004999306,0.0000017562442,0.004234896,0.000041048366,0.00014531858,0.98448354,0.00013385741,0.0012572481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005618176,0.0008026239,0.1945497,0.0009911258,0.00026956835,0.000043760796,0.18088472,0.00081535365,0.0019341498,0.14136316,0.47197825,0.0007494391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05590909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35411203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8431204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002741351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049617974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9866318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890117492","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv360npz6.13","title":"Political Functions and Limitations of Contemporary State Constitutions in the United States","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Politics; Political science; Law and economics; Theoretical physics; Law; Political economy; Sociology; Physics; Computer science; Algorithm","score_opus":0.07941770574216818,"score_gpt":0.25510268361149685,"score_spread":0.17568497786932868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890117492","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005701247,0.0000055923942,0.000035456702,0.0020840133,0.00012142876,0.0003981974,0.0015265028,0.000079324695,0.9956925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33329642,0.0011295531,0.000017749719,0.00027379394,0.000057878184,0.0000057331213,0.00018780798,0.000015045183,0.665016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880505,0.00015666122,0.00021549765,0.0002329521,0.0003309192,0.00025894435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982356,0.0011414522,0.00012209223,0.00013844653,0.00025630105,0.00010611845],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021928361,0.00017172731,0.00025693382,0.00030353363,0.0012659562,0.00002440361,0.0002147659,0.00014910166,0.0000039587117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012664447,0.00016132824,0.00009351765,0.00007301384,0.0029772983,0.00008592305,0.00015222593,0.00030295274,0.0000064977426],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002401006,0.000017111584,0.000034509412,0.00001036963,0.000103386905,0.000052621017,0.0010501763,0.000017620932,1.8395244e-7,0.9971622,0.0014329838,0.0000948323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023974088,0.00003048649,0.0001362723,0.00009607856,0.00009261523,5.327746e-7,0.008702277,0.0000028972895,9.773681e-7,0.060085297,0.9304471,0.0001657497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04790841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045846408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9370769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001247866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002859629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890844950","doi":"","title":"Misrepresenting the Supreme Court's Record? A Comment on Sujit Choudhry and Claire E. Hunter, \"Measuring Judicial Activism on the Supreme Court of Canada\"","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Judicial activism; Judicial review","score_opus":0.05152245062291007,"score_gpt":0.26822321045992514,"score_spread":0.2167007598370151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890844950","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31428352,0.0002934143,0.000018820307,0.25423303,0.0018030222,0.0004568429,0.000050105096,0.000030405556,0.42883083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958075,0.00019579718,0.000010448293,0.0031679596,0.0007639719,0.000007326852,4.1525658e-7,0.0000088793995,0.000037654107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978208,0.00024268517,0.00031714395,0.00018200901,0.0010062368,0.00043113902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893224,0.00038870476,0.00023423138,0.00013626461,0.00017736424,0.00013120564],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012423651,0.00015683896,0.0002294814,0.000029020877,0.010074673,0.0000878354,0.00034371504,0.000054354725,0.000055847497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002515479,0.00009706581,0.000100454774,0.00012858678,0.000665958,0.00011945046,0.00008943832,0.0005042181,0.0000027022254],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019730016,0.00019429045,0.002653481,0.000007233178,0.0002666777,0.00004246664,0.0019940156,0.00032106487,0.000111300855,0.9819114,0.008356869,0.0039438517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012219239,0.00021938929,0.013654813,0.0006361796,0.00009389737,0.000043919066,0.012238753,0.000017585526,0.0011678607,0.03344788,0.93689,0.0003677858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.65694207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89515215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94846356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044726965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020942428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9912141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891388505","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198794356.013.13","title":"Legal History As The History of Legal Texts","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Casebook; Deference; Law; Legal writing; Legal history; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Literature; Political science; History; Legal research; Art","score_opus":0.03423799146259209,"score_gpt":0.2191489708567455,"score_spread":0.1849109793941534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891388505","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005040543,0.0017563101,0.000008037315,0.00011258214,0.0016851827,0.00022098744,0.000026371505,0.000053657477,0.9960865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003711361,0.00048695243,0.00001197131,0.00017424038,0.00047536165,6.091217e-7,0.0000031834543,0.000010822285,0.9951255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988106,0.00006125315,0.0001449187,0.00025910855,0.0005043139,0.0002198328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991174,0.000079856865,0.00024859692,0.00022799757,0.0002400674,0.00008611554],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018771381,0.00019203058,0.00027553222,0.00007560948,0.0004847826,0.000009353032,0.00060949015,0.00023822894,0.0006343512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023614119,0.00017944293,0.00022571666,0.0000052249025,0.004766694,0.00011238863,0.0002565446,0.0002804627,0.000008630216],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056845143,0.0000071811623,0.000001359308,0.000006883484,0.00010090209,0.000033790417,0.0028759323,1.5183242e-7,0.0000021909082,0.88545203,0.11046452,0.0009981904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012721762,0.00004316275,0.0000052332307,0.000053831376,0.0001460576,0.0000014978265,0.00035743116,3.0021118e-7,0.0000017653521,0.0044069556,0.99465764,0.00019892331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019967828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004362894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8841931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021172233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019380382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99794173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891432583","doi":"10.4324/9781351201834-5","title":"Exploring constitutional statutes in common law systems","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Constitutionality; Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Jurisprudence; Constitution","score_opus":0.05113832973031576,"score_gpt":0.2844327519446946,"score_spread":0.23329442221437882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891432583","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79625326,0.007096033,0.00029600004,0.0014162195,0.0016396095,0.00024841863,0.0000044322474,0.000043060514,0.19300294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993669,0.0054459237,0.0000056263552,0.0000722341,0.00040705007,0.000012490383,0.0000014135254,0.00000337198,0.0003829061],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771106,0.00013350749,0.00023186348,0.00012701123,0.00041001636,0.0013865659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996334,0.000099524645,0.000076204575,0.000052365707,0.0000769933,0.00006154756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001670466,0.00008828718,0.00018292977,0.000073110736,0.00068263774,0.00007721423,0.00018068503,0.000040329247,0.000032445776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027540409,0.00008132187,0.00005724107,0.00020240477,0.00062656257,0.00053002196,0.00002806581,0.00080593076,0.00012967979],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000151151335,0.000025109326,0.022028878,0.0000016553792,0.00003487622,0.0000038170183,0.00047405204,0.00018532964,0.0000136613235,0.976593,0.000011703455,0.0006128123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059328676,0.00008676045,0.002167493,0.00009615168,0.000012430658,0.00005810237,0.033311438,0.000013263757,0.0000056548165,0.89398944,0.069440804,0.000225142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013825069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04064503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1974157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012450079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027868652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99274194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891851733","doi":"10.1089/elj.2018.0520","title":"Beyond Party Financing: The Rise of Political Ethics Regulation in Canada and France","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Politics; Legislature; Political science; Language change; Compromise; Public administration; Campaign finance; Government (linguistics); Political economy; Enforcement; Legislation; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.02002488011239611,"score_gpt":0.309651125580348,"score_spread":0.2896262454679519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891851733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9205073,0.0006420086,0.000051174247,0.026812764,0.00025436148,0.000063647436,0.000014271556,0.0000041123367,0.05165037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970727,0.00038491652,0.000023167073,0.0012870048,0.0011121415,0.0000011041968,2.4348515e-7,0.0000023449863,0.000116368006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907607,0.00014247799,0.00018735186,0.00006765666,0.0002343725,0.00029205385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936163,0.000214934,0.00007457339,0.000035856316,0.00019984167,0.00011318879],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044335105,0.00005699536,0.00009985983,0.000040671403,0.0017199968,0.00003648561,0.00005064428,0.000054344633,0.000010341543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039425303,0.0000432075,0.000016750806,0.00015104738,0.0012147921,0.000078396355,0.000018540095,0.00024833521,6.376518e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034877708,0.00000535066,0.009434654,0.0000026710502,0.0000051961993,5.9766086e-7,0.0013939852,0.0000010350948,0.0000072891344,0.9881354,0.00010102833,0.0009092879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013138157,0.000047510435,0.13472064,0.00002731007,0.000008821165,0.00002073099,0.0011904592,0.000029174837,0.00009735032,0.7924546,0.071205884,0.000066132096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9861999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98279953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19568081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022290369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017247493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892250763","doi":"","title":"Review of 'Institutionalized Reason: The Jurisprudence of Robert Alexy', Matthias Klatt, Ed. (Oxford University Press, 2012)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Jurisprudence; Morality; Law; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.011371098257077153,"score_gpt":0.26043173220057025,"score_spread":0.2490606339434931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892250763","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011387515,0.7498271,0.0015343974,0.026332213,0.0004734307,0.00086436473,0.000014748819,0.000035625715,0.20953062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29619533,0.70083123,0.000049472677,0.00024706515,0.00018142496,0.0000028530726,0.0000011471404,0.0000030140511,0.0024884383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981666,0.0002231502,0.000273677,0.000114635164,0.00047517562,0.00074676424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894875,0.00011411773,0.00031936137,0.00011276213,0.0004430528,0.000061938284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001614535,0.00009739543,0.00023962968,0.000027328126,0.00074301887,0.000014625649,0.0004991448,0.000053183718,0.00028537182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020891114,0.00006891691,0.00016808898,0.00023526112,0.0009532155,0.00039035289,0.00007069869,0.00049987034,0.000012668406],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016539574,0.000037679874,0.0005961664,0.000044670654,0.00011019204,5.618721e-7,0.000114009716,0.000003276232,0.000014081167,0.98548734,0.010626564,0.0029488895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002568511,0.00005833123,0.0016388942,0.001029023,0.00010820638,0.000030341615,0.001517218,0.0000019062545,0.000011783292,0.10370906,0.8915162,0.00012219485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0090389205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022638785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8817783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034575444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030066904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99755996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894311746","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjy034","title":"The Canadian Reference Power: Delegation to the Courts and the Navigation of Federalism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Delegate; Delegation; Political science; Politics; Power (physics); Government (linguistics); Public administration; Law and economics; New Federalism; Blame; Law; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.02384343397391637,"score_gpt":0.2908756696374878,"score_spread":0.2670322356635714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894311746","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4095348,0.0012562505,0.00009627199,0.5367436,0.0011544181,0.000406508,0.000009914716,0.0000071972668,0.050791085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959201,0.0004185125,0.00001873224,0.0027097214,0.000654986,0.000005301505,6.1337727e-7,0.0000035279445,0.00026846692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816245,0.0005262898,0.0003329985,0.00006962586,0.000653371,0.00025523978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99775594,0.00056803605,0.00034035373,0.00012941587,0.0010845839,0.0001216833],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044056484,0.00008583889,0.00013978082,0.000039448372,0.0077030784,0.00056186615,0.00055586384,0.00004333357,0.0000146585235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079136394,0.000033662287,0.000056627698,0.00021114909,0.0017584207,0.00026387267,0.00005901239,0.00023284314,0.000006920183],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000120161836,0.000008263542,0.00030475412,0.0000010378585,0.00008253989,0.0000010968265,0.028093837,0.000010580154,0.000018198218,0.94096494,0.02448201,0.00591256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056877406,0.0001314627,0.037477773,0.000072778996,0.000084923704,0.00005290622,0.0121945115,0.000029215944,0.0000578765,0.1985869,0.7506009,0.00014199909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35104656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.65718824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74237806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012563165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067520014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99358875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894764957","doi":"","title":"Judicial Review and Contemporary Democratic Theory: Power, Domination, and the Courts","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Judicial review; Veto; Politics; Law; Political science; Judicial activism; Context (archaeology); Constitutional review; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Opposition (politics); Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.026085343618850825,"score_gpt":0.30101373343551335,"score_spread":0.2749283898166625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894764957","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000028912016,0.18337901,0.000020312187,0.019768117,0.00020413054,0.0006663762,0.000012189631,0.00002118333,0.7959258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02813359,0.15404297,0.000009965249,0.0063400893,0.0005587178,0.000050709812,0.000009634065,0.000010006901,0.8108443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998851,0.0002522968,0.0002215821,0.00021567871,0.00031916337,0.00014025453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876887,0.00060775434,0.00025432007,0.00014160121,0.00016117276,0.00006627732],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020289016,0.00016482633,0.000509635,0.000023615825,0.0024089972,0.0001107924,0.00021900507,0.00011214716,0.00012956004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00090829073,0.00009861741,0.00006910994,0.000019922565,0.00555382,0.00012197565,0.0001265444,0.00016457969,0.000018625109],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013320262,0.0000029719854,0.0000104603405,0.000035685152,0.000061993895,0.0000025504658,0.0005188401,8.173755e-10,1.0792071e-8,0.77815586,0.21936695,0.0018313398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022868752,0.0000073748547,0.00008430046,0.00038313365,0.00015138734,0.0000014831172,0.00013577864,6.343168e-8,2.2035834e-8,0.5495127,0.4493995,0.00009556058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010028795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010125646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23003255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042173462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009362323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99888974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895430193","doi":"10.1017/s0008423918000732","title":"Stability and Change: Policy Evolution on the Supreme Court of Canada, 1945–2005","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Scholarship; Political science; Civil liberties; Law; Civil rights; Politics","score_opus":0.050924240759695295,"score_gpt":0.30002955800907194,"score_spread":0.24910531724937665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895430193","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8507911,0.00011325453,0.000017833443,0.110633,0.00042276192,0.00009455264,0.000037522906,0.0000017170463,0.037888255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978175,0.0000041091766,0.0000097906395,0.0012840133,0.0008587892,7.54555e-7,3.253513e-8,0.0000010958852,0.000023907907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984173,0.00007483864,0.00016785259,0.000089608075,0.0005530585,0.00069734233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99808395,0.0001590266,0.0000678995,0.00006962756,0.0005386595,0.0010808611],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016267219,0.000051700747,0.00010134778,0.00009508635,0.0013731848,0.00003541463,0.00030834862,0.000024666799,0.00012090242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003205169,0.000035006324,0.00002339982,0.0004174454,0.00839028,0.00014915997,0.000018580717,0.000097468284,0.0000016227771],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025986558,0.0000037722534,0.008196955,7.4004737e-7,0.0000025140826,0.0000020173586,0.0010022238,7.3136775e-8,0.000027777225,0.9899913,0.0006441077,0.00012593712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008427257,0.00011213483,0.8927629,0.00004191798,0.000008670392,0.000008642179,0.005065402,0.0000102807735,0.00029083533,0.088533156,0.012997052,0.00008471997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9917248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90145814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014982367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024239939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895460886","doi":"10.1017/s1352325218000113","title":"REASONING BY PRECEDENT—BETWEEN RULES AND ANALOGIES","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Analogical reasoning; Discretion; Argument (complex analysis); Defeasible reasoning; Process (computing); Deductive reasoning; Epistemology; Case-based reasoning; Computer science; Law; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019677710353878063,"score_gpt":0.3037214548208461,"score_spread":0.28404374446696806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895460886","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2981688,0.0017916423,0.00040124793,0.0009878195,0.00017679519,0.00006716604,0.000016962975,0.0000834352,0.69830614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970961,0.00017758526,0.000098100565,0.00015103877,0.0006821244,0.000003899382,0.0000020676484,0.000002511569,0.0017865343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993839,0.0001164152,0.00006796696,0.00011842907,0.00014208253,0.00017120613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996798,0.00015971782,0.000026782507,0.00004346767,0.000043079668,0.00004714048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044820821,0.000054962024,0.00008634486,0.000016872684,0.0009165187,0.00006585995,0.00009780302,0.00003974464,0.0000861062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028356104,0.000046809797,0.000020061649,0.0000732047,0.0015744806,0.00015201746,0.00005850548,0.000052805448,0.000060491788],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008411902,0.0000042844,0.007853884,7.488753e-7,0.000020678324,6.324191e-7,0.001677514,1.633196e-8,0.00003255792,0.9738007,0.0017629609,0.014837599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092498616,0.000043171418,0.022301093,0.00003269755,0.000022747774,5.277435e-7,0.0044842013,4.781257e-7,0.00021907293,0.54041594,0.4322484,0.00013913057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028497635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006418627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69892734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021098433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004110573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7049213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897181300","doi":"10.1093/icon/moy022","title":"Unstable Constitutionalism—Law and Politics in South Asia","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Politics; Political science; Law; Democracy","score_opus":0.025541900413855054,"score_gpt":0.3169803067568737,"score_spread":0.29143840634301865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897181300","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024787305,0.0015620582,0.002528595,0.007972863,0.0036180574,0.00015390333,0.00012205818,0.000026560654,0.9592286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941832,0.00014211272,0.00075933256,0.002490337,0.0023279653,0.0000029696134,0.000005307452,0.0000032775647,0.00008552368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791497,0.00009955791,0.00054257753,0.00016341764,0.0009995789,0.00027991986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99759054,0.0002044347,0.00024476286,0.000057754474,0.0017316705,0.00017084874],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007293521,0.0001328679,0.00023108828,0.00018657185,0.000712183,0.00013099171,0.00035447252,0.00009683163,0.00025511676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039657688,0.00012631166,0.00009289336,0.00016724208,0.015230401,0.0006216061,0.00008491045,0.00021093694,0.000041026822],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006235809,0.00007013007,0.0031431096,0.0000013598207,0.00010014795,0.000087889064,0.0008620812,0.000023155273,0.000035808796,0.9952207,0.0002745141,0.00011873752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082032324,0.000047100948,0.0008309378,0.00013083509,0.000022760167,0.00017588524,0.00082837796,0.0000069888083,0.00011867032,0.313287,0.68357503,0.00015609973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026830535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026422217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9693959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030147587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013985593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9874496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898060614","doi":"10.29173/alr2498","title":"Novel Uses of the Charter Following Doré and Loyola","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Statutory law; Duty; Law; Constitutionalism; State (computer science); Government (linguistics); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Democracy; Philosophy; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.03600915420637599,"score_gpt":0.31414109384867095,"score_spread":0.278131939642295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898060614","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032723255,0.11388917,0.000019275654,0.028189752,0.00083816715,0.000635161,0.000006792694,0.000015357935,0.8236831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886618,0.0066708424,0.000017674989,0.00410873,0.00015248632,0.0000074604045,2.639994e-7,0.0000020370308,0.00037869782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995197,0.00004179519,0.000113978254,0.000083776446,0.00014069007,0.000100062614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996808,0.00012012589,0.000046112415,0.00008253729,0.000046266578,0.00002414256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021051147,0.000047797315,0.00014389881,0.0000031372238,0.0003972198,0.000009875521,0.00011703183,0.000017800163,0.000061087194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021714794,0.00002845036,0.00007808427,0.00011699881,0.0007343428,0.00006836123,0.0000553433,0.000027011627,0.000023053486],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.749407e-7,0.000013071392,0.0025505903,0.000049780778,0.00003176178,1.0606177e-7,0.0006271552,2.5476763e-9,0.00005528455,0.9929305,0.0013108563,0.0024302164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046695073,0.000008479262,0.0018912334,0.0011323594,0.000060909453,6.9113037e-7,0.000048146314,8.2598255e-8,0.000034438446,0.0018222405,0.9949029,0.000051838946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07008585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09298003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.993592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000072408675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036110356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9361065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898385144","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12354","title":"<i>Law and Revolution: Legitimacy and Constitutionalism After the Arab Spring.</i> By Nimer Sultany. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Legitimacy; Citation; Law; Political science; Sociology; Media studies; Classics; History; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.01960913537046508,"score_gpt":0.2630031266161097,"score_spread":0.24339399124564462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898385144","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006637665,0.5999642,0.000058767586,0.017043302,0.00023027661,0.0006495134,0.00011067808,0.000063636224,0.38121587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12447973,0.859653,0.00021036918,0.014234319,0.00041102557,0.000018361856,0.00000604887,0.0000046100795,0.0009825426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894065,0.00011288438,0.00015845617,0.00026333227,0.000268768,0.00025590832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941754,0.00009215183,0.00008222501,0.00013224137,0.00017955618,0.00009629274],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047132422,0.00013719323,0.0002301604,7.1577807e-7,0.0026238868,0.00005509609,0.00016406721,0.00007063887,0.000061296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031779982,0.00010399655,0.00012334334,0.00014034161,0.0073275263,0.0003117004,0.00015511645,0.00013233401,0.0000081099915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000748396,0.000013640229,0.00038302966,0.00007287794,0.000052845804,0.0000014481411,0.00024800602,2.1043146e-8,0.0000015112071,0.9323636,0.06652371,0.00033178643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001488716,0.000011430263,0.00028180904,0.00039112163,0.00012432438,0.0000051010643,0.00022430009,0.0000012959031,0.0000013879062,0.0023639873,0.9963016,0.00014476152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004776785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018208592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92999965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006458304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000938918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899667883","doi":"","title":"Parliamentary Committees: Types, Powers andPerformance Order (Canadian experience)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Political science; Computer science; Law; Business","score_opus":0.08976508967498635,"score_gpt":0.3284317285611358,"score_spread":0.23866663888614942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899667883","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28182596,0.001547354,0.00028915034,0.0015706974,0.0003191357,0.00010588178,0.0000034497225,0.000007496267,0.7143309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99843997,0.00011895949,0.00029967888,0.00077985704,0.00022177576,0.0000017542415,0.0000015065535,0.0000013554571,0.00013514944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925965,0.00006710714,0.0001930597,0.000061111736,0.0002774989,0.00014158881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992052,0.000034685592,0.00012812519,0.00003240794,0.00037636433,0.00022322666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030214485,0.00006632343,0.00015458054,0.000052453353,0.0004842111,0.000058168513,0.00008759617,0.00003199804,0.00006016892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020096946,0.000053089403,0.000028301169,0.00015707588,0.000578913,0.0005175467,0.000010346105,0.00009258165,0.000008864589],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040725252,0.000018678264,0.019387318,5.336575e-7,0.000032472915,0.0000046920745,0.023075225,0.00006278187,0.0000026209523,0.95314896,0.0036975604,0.00052840856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063737686,0.00019129257,0.0048701656,0.0000352404,0.000019337102,0.000011594443,0.078644745,0.00011167803,0.0000235598,0.05289065,0.86241734,0.00014699298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031620998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1055792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9002583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010322753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003532192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9748275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900123666","doi":"10.11144/javeriana.upsy17-4.fvpc","title":"French and Venezuelan People’s Conceptualization of Human Rights: Indivisibility and Universality Issues","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Universitas Psychologica","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université TÉLUQ","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Universality (dynamical systems); Civil liberties; Human rights; Politics; Sociology; Inequality; Social psychology; Political science; Law; Psychology; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03491920915228045,"score_gpt":0.34147802529990356,"score_spread":0.3065588161476231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900123666","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8785637,0.00025621586,0.000048771377,0.00055135594,0.00006833385,0.000088361725,0.000014882752,0.00002844555,0.12037992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996315,0.00008229295,0.00007844835,0.000038823975,0.00006275383,2.4182717e-7,0.0000042064917,8.862818e-7,0.0001008318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937665,0.000116215124,0.00008102973,0.00018810637,0.00012727737,0.000110693225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996517,0.00003384946,0.00006275616,0.00007207784,0.0001277313,0.00005190142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020516758,0.000059310605,0.00011868512,0.000040561346,0.0009320137,0.000011529919,0.000094756666,0.000068722366,0.00039294563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030758067,0.000053358395,0.000017637329,0.0001793418,0.0023674013,0.00011934283,0.000057453934,0.00003945893,0.0000038502594],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014694768,0.000055454213,0.2606207,0.0000028343209,0.000025963283,0.0000019792428,0.030125014,6.125635e-8,0.00007457698,0.70698303,0.0018088135,0.0002868637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003735227,0.0002618971,0.85383636,0.000016128271,0.00003696478,5.376637e-7,0.025316186,7.22576e-7,0.000022329898,0.08931327,0.030694285,0.00012781483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016243078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0090834815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61766976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029263134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015776075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99030787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900516636","doi":"10.1177/0097700418811072","title":"Political Resources and Divergent Court Empowerment in China: A Subnational Comparison","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern China","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Politics; Empowerment; China; Political science; Socioeconomic status; Democracy; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.023933543303641502,"score_gpt":0.31528618417311316,"score_spread":0.29135264086947166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900516636","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88974535,0.00032993493,0.0002097508,0.00889382,0.00016612123,0.00009613243,0.0000090743,0.000024249017,0.10052556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99930984,0.000024164228,0.000051340503,0.00016411717,0.0002992492,0.0000075416738,0.000002079328,0.000002591622,0.00013910254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990186,0.00006100042,0.00013222898,0.00016447884,0.00035365653,0.00027005083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99976796,0.0000296518,0.000026810834,0.000042828524,0.000037715457,0.00009502101],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023830986,0.00007156757,0.000121226476,0.00004232696,0.0006601013,0.00003548444,0.0000906629,0.00004139292,0.000067123234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007047778,0.00006395488,0.000023398201,0.000089193345,0.00081824657,0.00006619194,0.000085007465,0.000074842384,0.00001872446],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026638108,0.00012379339,0.35883301,0.0000018699494,0.000013753277,0.0000029277494,0.02065677,0.000004276302,0.000013327485,0.6184996,0.00055931404,0.0012647221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017710138,0.000037421083,0.8356066,0.000013952324,0.0000053043304,5.471272e-7,0.001195143,0.0005185397,0.000008386197,0.15065749,0.011690685,0.00008883372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009153845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007281842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4767736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001104309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000066935885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900519741","doi":"10.1017/als.2018.35","title":"The Political Origins of Professional Identity: Lawyers, Judges, and Prosecutors in Taiwan’s State Transformation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Identity (music); State (computer science); Politics; Legal profession; Authoritarianism; Political science; Power (physics); Democratization; Economic Justice; Sociology; Independence (probability theory); Democracy","score_opus":0.0159454842176147,"score_gpt":0.31418128497809733,"score_spread":0.2982358007604826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900519741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9379949,0.00054874626,0.00019318052,0.029911542,0.00039358635,0.0001461351,0.000011182994,0.00000454401,0.030796178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99918187,0.00026453807,0.000092740214,0.00027750706,0.00016280639,8.5532685e-7,1.9246889e-7,0.000001307626,0.000018175902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925935,0.0000703133,0.00021121124,0.000042378535,0.00026462847,0.00015211369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996433,0.000041877294,0.00008611916,0.000019561745,0.00014072437,0.00006838098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069280044,0.000041426396,0.00010303154,0.000009747932,0.00067847985,0.00003639648,0.00006536821,0.00003598843,0.0000045317174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036626083,0.000026533522,0.00004950044,0.000073895724,0.001663917,0.00033386174,0.000014731021,0.000108774126,3.3398797e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012600169,0.00001773364,0.005803832,0.000005104918,0.00002151835,7.407686e-7,0.039582286,3.1492664e-8,0.0000133874,0.95368063,0.00007097468,0.000791135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006701949,0.00019460668,0.055926677,0.00013997177,0.000034312972,0.000012623087,0.20827669,0.0000052148375,0.00008501959,0.6695914,0.064949654,0.00011363599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082478573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035443553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28408924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007117284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019932614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61307716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900691003","doi":"","title":"Vigilance and Restraint in the Common Law of Judicial Review: Introduction","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Judicial review; Law; Judgement; Judicial opinion; Commonwealth; Normative; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.013551723111018049,"score_gpt":0.30230386448776747,"score_spread":0.2887521413767494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900691003","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5410341,0.14717218,0.00026175345,0.19323426,0.001054766,0.0006350314,0.0000031885495,0.00002706642,0.11657765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9377284,0.05985834,0.0000060147922,0.0006031018,0.0017689136,0.0000022155532,2.5643035e-7,0.0000013940457,0.000031332267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988246,0.00018742886,0.00016821409,0.00007478878,0.00023229286,0.0005126636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997293,0.00003929152,0.000087939836,0.000047374895,0.000079478785,0.000016650529],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028638926,0.000045358414,0.000115775,0.00002016795,0.0005510838,0.00001313261,0.00013844698,0.000024142011,0.0000093183635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000108738604,0.000031459105,0.000027450527,0.00018078367,0.0009505311,0.000086495646,0.000014196913,0.00043155893,0.0000031830064],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013382096,0.00001483395,0.0007748238,0.00000335211,0.000010447718,4.6117668e-7,0.0008061276,1.302325e-7,0.000019029603,0.9923136,0.00040319763,0.0056405654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012023293,0.00015733615,0.0027781443,0.00010718926,0.000018076043,0.000039546816,0.003872546,4.340856e-7,0.0000094143215,0.9157876,0.07705622,0.000053307504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046707457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11510534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39669433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001518365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005011993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9010417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901505419","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0060","title":"How institutions structure judicial behaviour: An analysis of Alarie and Green’s <i>Commitment and Cooperation on High Courts: A Cross-Country Examination of Institutional Constraints on Judges</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Simple (philosophy); Structuring; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Key (lock); Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01783893595478457,"score_gpt":0.26579021817837395,"score_spread":0.24795128222358936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901505419","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98579705,0.000083835235,0.0003421667,0.00031498878,0.00015303327,0.00010278108,0.00037980257,0.0000059553504,0.0128203705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994655,0.00013937142,0.00016773352,0.00005693366,0.00012277055,1.01518296e-7,0.000026889058,0.0000013768752,0.000019270983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991174,0.00010307063,0.00014492516,0.00013621067,0.00039308995,0.00010533422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900043,0.000040356244,0.00021849919,0.0000621995,0.0005891215,0.000089376954],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002458385,0.00008560786,0.00021804677,0.00007759365,0.0017281894,0.000042541506,0.00010675112,0.000093877694,0.00020521967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045571476,0.00008651253,0.000047040558,0.00009438128,0.0046531856,0.00059676776,0.00003264841,0.00008933865,1.382569e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014369574,0.0001785226,0.017304588,0.0000042485685,0.0003315408,0.0000060562343,0.004203699,0.00012542175,0.0002523384,0.97210974,0.000024332574,0.0053158104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001552331,0.000927293,0.9783162,0.00008248929,0.000998729,0.0000084656895,0.012071066,0.00009130335,0.00024476077,0.0019353912,0.003555861,0.00021611637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.068856984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37754893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9701744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002510335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022912213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901778456","doi":"","title":"The Constitution of the Administrative State","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Deference; Law; State (computer science); Supreme court; Constitution; Constitutional law; Judicial deference; Dissent; Jurisdiction; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.021917845986021835,"score_gpt":0.31479411389290407,"score_spread":0.29287626790688226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901778456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44010207,0.0069588646,0.0027136954,0.031186022,0.002623661,0.0004373158,0.000009903413,0.000032445907,0.515936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954919,0.0028688468,0.0000033357944,0.00006059665,0.00041143334,0.0000017474389,5.803176e-8,0.0000010975293,0.0011609629],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865204,0.0001488816,0.00013704807,0.000054684027,0.0002900162,0.0007173337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947363,0.00008751771,0.00012992119,0.000053955642,0.00022943577,0.000025551393],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015066905,0.00004611766,0.00005883231,0.0000098120245,0.003344413,0.000032338685,0.00025242232,0.000020420159,0.000010987317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002630041,0.000023411658,0.00006221842,0.00016808124,0.003196131,0.000072050294,0.000026490165,0.00038265757,0.000012675587],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018866498,0.000008329188,0.0013091738,1.2179163e-7,0.00004612743,1.2215847e-7,0.0010103408,4.679521e-7,0.000027503358,0.99143034,0.00012275766,0.0060258554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009893823,0.00009836281,0.0020029298,0.000009588555,0.000013437475,0.000012272646,0.01190846,7.2908506e-7,0.00015814858,0.90491545,0.0807406,0.000041071416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013019562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07165393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5553898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029411525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006221998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902231276","doi":"10.5287/ora-vjar7qa9x","title":"Conceptualising political candidacy as a human right","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Candidacy; Dignity; Duty; Obligation; Political science; Jurisprudence; Law; Politics; Autonomy; Human rights; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03623052415507665,"score_gpt":0.3219518662971362,"score_spread":0.2857213421420595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902231276","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18870625,0.000079548474,0.00024567737,0.0012863019,0.00019372554,0.0005144374,0.00023388964,0.00008032869,0.80865985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9521714,0.0010095456,0.0003197918,0.00004120646,0.00028642308,3.5323652e-7,0.00068095844,0.000021658576,0.045468684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994982,0.0010797923,0.00020554491,0.0006954367,0.0017292098,0.0013079847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997065,0.00065362063,0.00024699862,0.00034115187,0.0009907321,0.0007024915],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009948452,0.00031372998,0.0006581302,0.0009318527,0.006902923,0.00007124223,0.0016160905,0.00039320582,0.0013247451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033235244,0.00041113194,0.00040451626,0.00092041574,0.0050541204,0.00044320337,0.0004894877,0.0011177807,0.000053595508],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047738437,0.00013149528,0.0018227948,0.00007103671,0.00022010875,0.00023179018,0.014047177,0.0000014718687,0.00010350058,0.97673833,0.0049799792,0.0011749201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081990706,0.0002681261,0.0055231918,0.00028144382,0.0001247875,0.0000016853191,0.18863343,0.000008788346,0.000021006075,0.073367305,0.7305225,0.00042782407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13874611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20598222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90337104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008235252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022254516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903239299","doi":"10.1093/icon/moaa006","title":"Shadow constitutional review: The dark side of pre-enactment political review in Ireland and Japan","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Constitutionality; Politics; Institution; Judicial review; Parliament; Shadow (psychology); Law; Political science; Constitutional theory; Constitutional law; Sociology; Constitution; Law and economics; Democracy","score_opus":0.030280441528426034,"score_gpt":0.3364541747398641,"score_spread":0.3061737332114381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903239299","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031697194,0.1938165,0.0009221188,0.4534524,0.0013195345,0.00077524764,0.00024248361,0.000018855344,0.34628314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93468267,0.04166958,0.00011750813,0.022982262,0.00051418843,0.000008880196,0.000009554976,0.0000020224918,0.000013316845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973743,0.00019443252,0.00082833786,0.00015300587,0.0012400785,0.00020986177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980159,0.0004630015,0.00037511447,0.000058925827,0.00089250674,0.00019458203],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009894085,0.00013250328,0.000386982,0.000054759315,0.00025053805,0.000031856973,0.00044122298,0.000051190826,0.00015233671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015592928,0.00009481231,0.0001679829,0.00018269365,0.008122833,0.0003072983,0.00010355603,0.00027973292,0.000009566688],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000722394,0.0000687532,0.0028752473,0.00008983449,0.00013867396,0.00003743417,0.00013034848,0.000017910119,0.000020937592,0.99159336,0.004519,0.00043626348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011015225,0.000110942055,0.0050930693,0.009207164,0.0002000172,0.00035739093,0.00034283983,0.0000072095168,0.000051217314,0.08464616,0.89863527,0.0002471724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00074043736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026827733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93151295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017121591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013001559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9945765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904309482","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0010","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada and Appointment of Judges in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Original jurisdiction; Court of record; Jurisdiction; Parliament; Politics","score_opus":0.02238634392034839,"score_gpt":0.2031926013186986,"score_spread":0.1808062573983502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904309482","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017843967,0.00027022182,5.4595716e-7,0.0002183344,0.00010965559,0.00015295472,0.000115648785,0.0000019057061,0.99734634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40165022,0.0017108207,0.000006250722,0.000021070302,0.000036553938,4.4874392e-7,0.0000021568935,0.000004290833,0.59656817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993046,0.000019964873,0.00010510154,0.000107265696,0.00032391533,0.00013915545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943954,0.00010506737,0.00018661114,0.00011983494,0.0000988396,0.000050081493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010628321,0.00008718924,0.0002005666,0.000017032069,0.00058060937,0.0000066603193,0.0002820101,0.000050527568,0.0000057736115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001822099,0.00007762655,0.00002744279,0.0000022858112,0.00074037013,0.000020153142,0.0001546112,0.000091400405,6.2645693e-9],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025893867,0.0000014545408,0.0007494117,0.000011194523,0.0000686167,0.000019972224,0.0003119336,0.000001590433,3.7736112e-7,0.99494624,0.0017453881,0.002117896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010855458,0.000007380786,0.00077314774,0.000059246344,0.000028952354,1.9087827e-7,0.00093617657,8.0122425e-7,0.0000058242053,0.0029387006,0.9950606,0.00008042281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99963915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9933152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053698895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005103355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9053132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905041924","doi":"10.1017/s1352325218000149","title":"NONPARTY PARTICIPATION AS A (PARTIAL) REMEDY TO PROCEDURALIST CONCERNS OVER JUDICIAL REVIEW","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Legitimacy; Indictment; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Judicial review; Sociology; Medicine; Politics","score_opus":0.04488811439413123,"score_gpt":0.38847877126375385,"score_spread":0.34359065686962265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905041924","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.103970006,0.0036257892,0.00036779456,0.023412107,0.001540921,0.0011495409,0.000020354608,0.00021423456,0.86569923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97881585,0.00049168215,0.000031079988,0.015979214,0.002584659,0.000102095226,0.0000031508876,0.0000067689593,0.001985521],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984916,0.00024781702,0.00023686596,0.00023947029,0.00043165623,0.00035261727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993261,0.000076411234,0.00007827996,0.00012305952,0.00023146239,0.0001646821],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009762187,0.00011090309,0.00020036478,0.0000259747,0.00094239257,0.000051167084,0.00018595436,0.000051555133,0.0016404754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001506165,0.000096227406,0.00007080963,0.00035736605,0.0009578703,0.00022383797,0.00006629891,0.000083436586,0.0014541359],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000791856,0.00003541685,0.00028120467,0.000014345923,0.000021898051,0.000003871387,0.0025141104,2.7487167e-7,0.00009546903,0.9735016,0.018838333,0.0046142847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012826495,0.00011748693,0.0018267971,0.0004072421,0.00006186166,7.4889175e-7,0.0004017988,0.0000012643744,0.0003584864,0.07807363,0.9184292,0.00019324942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008458122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074137044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89959085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009714855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033345426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99932337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905117221","doi":"10.29173/alr1430","title":"A Theory of Democratic Adjudication: Towards a Representative, Accountable and Independent Judiciary","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial independence; Accountability; Independence (probability theory); Adjudication; Democracy; Context (archaeology); Law; Judicial discretion; Politics; Political science; Commission; Order (exchange); Judicial activism; Judicial review; Separation of powers; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.029528190316933118,"score_gpt":0.32111342794412684,"score_spread":0.29158523762719374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905117221","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055376147,0.14660785,0.000013391698,0.005288358,0.00005048545,0.00046600166,0.0000042041074,0.0000140455895,0.84201807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80256796,0.19191898,0.000051589708,0.003313192,0.00007567568,0.0000647607,0.000003745726,0.000004384477,0.0019997028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987828,0.00028519065,0.000271844,0.00018940444,0.0003074348,0.00016334039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993191,0.0003012835,0.00009287712,0.0001373807,0.00008366562,0.00006568748],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074555486,0.00008904918,0.00029881916,0.000012479246,0.0004101416,0.000014438702,0.00015088251,0.000038580587,0.0021163062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024724836,0.000073883144,0.00006219538,0.000248429,0.00077839475,0.00019126984,0.00004123624,0.000066926,0.00007302338],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009126514,0.000036222686,0.00077918335,0.000099765944,0.000054327415,0.0000013426966,0.00076223694,2.6586054e-7,0.0000016004203,0.96851337,0.00198032,0.027762266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026406924,0.000041324613,0.009815802,0.0024070542,0.0002932518,0.0000085514,0.00054715556,0.0000016952208,0.000017366221,0.33190346,0.654443,0.0002572653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09352545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017140992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84001833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026259188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001431041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99879587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905127345","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3009858","title":"The Values of Canadian Constitutionalism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Political science; Law; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.02347431849823587,"score_gpt":0.29597613182463417,"score_spread":0.2725018133263983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905127345","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.065021805,0.011925976,0.00017258343,0.0655571,0.0015390314,0.00014972962,0.000009962431,0.0000137456955,0.8556101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.979536,0.018391933,0.000006728594,0.0000555018,0.00048260912,0.000001534829,2.2020905e-7,0.0000016051046,0.0015238422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984324,0.00005756996,0.000120852535,0.000057361136,0.00027153513,0.0010603054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994253,0.00006511009,0.00013816058,0.000097593685,0.0001848482,0.000089016015],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002039723,0.00004732172,0.0000744073,0.000060531896,0.010910046,0.00012086172,0.00048311122,0.000034280143,0.000016270971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006302493,0.000032519398,0.00006532077,0.00007097833,0.0020558927,0.00014097785,0.000023026103,0.000387268,0.000015533788],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037680834,0.0000034381421,0.0038283125,1.2895026e-7,0.00005365401,0.0000010059547,0.0002536809,0.000001000643,0.0000032572937,0.99071616,0.00035689777,0.004778723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007605601,0.000012976983,0.0046809483,0.000006679066,0.00001054295,0.000011446471,0.003917553,3.8009404e-7,0.0000041158987,0.7882675,0.20297156,0.000040233277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.58132875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9545402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91451424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048035252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013025362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99256986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905133010","doi":"","title":"Of Promise and Peril: The Court and Equality Rights","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Charter; Section (typography); Sociology","score_opus":0.023384606063626745,"score_gpt":0.31461717280355006,"score_spread":0.2912325667399233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905133010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9484672,0.004828905,0.00006836871,0.01515952,0.00011405961,0.00009950781,0.0000016440141,0.0000053480817,0.031255476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949797,0.0044122236,0.0000056815784,0.000023228327,0.00020709436,0.0000013669429,4.8869946e-8,0.0000011683085,0.0003694817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912196,0.00007066458,0.00009145161,0.00006500174,0.0001779561,0.0004729545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967116,0.00004053403,0.00012305727,0.00006270791,0.00006545402,0.00003706787],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017117116,0.000043909735,0.00008851405,0.000009215158,0.0034766605,0.000076164884,0.00016025738,0.000025199995,0.00000864009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012830431,0.00002610203,0.000025304022,0.000016796464,0.0012002309,0.00012474542,0.000044312455,0.00029045134,7.649216e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013175379,0.000008410126,0.010377459,7.736305e-7,0.00003777737,3.3227195e-7,0.0012765692,4.881213e-8,0.000013547375,0.98355705,0.000022904644,0.0046919473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001821347,0.000043784457,0.02867248,0.000008236094,0.000021433947,0.00001653028,0.0036088228,0.0000014780439,0.00000906273,0.9491687,0.018220842,0.000046488967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008155518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041161902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046512537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007244512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070804445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99844927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905153472","doi":"10.4324/9781315668567-13","title":"Judicial review of the electoral process in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Political science; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.023823364766932132,"score_gpt":0.2742276965181041,"score_spread":0.25040433175117194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905153472","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000030077093,0.014485597,3.4658663e-7,0.005390788,0.00031892827,0.00024174455,0.000020835034,0.0000044687354,0.9795072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44547313,0.06273239,0.000003365103,0.007436762,0.0014066866,0.000034439505,0.0000028354616,0.000019806099,0.4828906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898577,0.000020122008,0.00021931023,0.000111955866,0.00052022625,0.00014261015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995762,0.000047757298,0.00013045823,0.000068578825,0.00014998033,0.000027035101],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015399192,0.00009077331,0.00025456384,0.000013971222,0.00015696557,0.0000022052034,0.0002452471,0.00005259373,0.001128822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010987673,0.00005027314,0.00006335003,0.000050396684,0.00037314996,0.00002276436,0.000038841652,0.00009941402,0.000009212631],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017111524,0.0000016681846,0.0008344665,0.000110902125,0.0000126968125,0.0000013773318,0.00003869593,2.4277005e-8,1.3715653e-7,0.9893721,0.0072578746,0.0023683575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005414495,0.0000047163353,0.0006706291,0.008739861,0.000028231034,2.4060148e-7,0.000055123717,1.7481055e-8,0.0000033913097,0.15519802,0.8350852,0.00016040477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95472395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83417404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041081497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0083694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905977709","doi":"10.29173/alr1395","title":"Redeeming the Rule of Law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Law and economics; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.05595341588684005,"score_gpt":0.31063202793767497,"score_spread":0.2546786120508349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905977709","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014607486,0.14072892,6.2225826e-7,0.01978054,0.00008379459,0.00013658803,8.134241e-7,0.000006098598,0.8391166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.872712,0.11407101,0.00001975448,0.010553056,0.00016621697,0.000022654163,6.72769e-7,0.000003149657,0.0024514464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937737,0.00007393884,0.0001573847,0.000079937825,0.00018488137,0.00012651533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994897,0.00026701245,0.000061569976,0.00010697666,0.000047447298,0.000027253614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002671874,0.000049694467,0.00015852787,0.000002607455,0.0006145831,0.000009600708,0.00017608363,0.000019455354,0.00082437106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017638362,0.00003092655,0.00008074463,0.00012652927,0.0007600443,0.000063495514,0.000033812674,0.000045117016,0.00021288608],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.801409e-7,0.0000100869465,0.000035804835,0.000037504047,0.000011527165,2.7046443e-7,0.0006714094,4.0990685e-8,0.0000012891404,0.9931357,0.002867203,0.003228965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019522444,0.000003718253,0.00001814913,0.0005522989,0.00003399503,5.632846e-7,0.000042020583,2.9343778e-7,0.0000058528167,0.006852153,0.99242854,0.000042889584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11619138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037487593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9895613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012857666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011871297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9800758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906133617","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0024","title":"Constructing the global constitutional canon: Between authority and criticism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitutionalism; Human rights; Constitutional law; Political science; Comparative law; Criticism; Sociology; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.024486889273632746,"score_gpt":0.2788400033718727,"score_spread":0.25435311409823996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2906133617","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058587268,0.0010102366,0.0013996526,0.004178357,0.00049148913,0.000059819205,0.00006510328,0.000014390516,0.9341937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986219,0.00008982517,0.00049579935,0.000059912923,0.0006720075,1.4795959e-8,3.7989716e-7,4.727381e-7,0.000059684793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993551,0.00009940434,0.000079140445,0.00007352115,0.00024376485,0.00014911905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945146,0.000085102976,0.000052456315,0.000033319528,0.00027631284,0.0001013231],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003713063,0.000047869176,0.00010280466,0.0000038577664,0.004219461,0.000032350497,0.00016035016,0.000043723332,0.00042535318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000063449355,0.00004219163,0.00004327435,0.00002969526,0.0103172865,0.00025932697,0.000070460315,0.0000777955,0.0000032377534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009319311,0.00000488792,0.03819759,7.542535e-7,0.00003907706,0.0000051795714,0.00126829,4.1676746e-8,0.0000010301525,0.9570569,0.00029985863,0.003117103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067185645,0.00009827874,0.054823473,0.000067250534,0.00016004528,0.000095431125,0.084399834,0.00000293569,0.000012664264,0.19821376,0.6612492,0.00020528116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.171951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.50613517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9400346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035518594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028819303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906659536","doi":"","title":"Reassessing the Constitutional Foundation of Delegated Legislation in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Lawmaking; Delegation; Law; Political science; Constitution; Legislation; Supreme court; Democracy; Legislature; Politics","score_opus":0.012097330551733709,"score_gpt":0.26047579130853993,"score_spread":0.24837846075680622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2906659536","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94465256,0.0010573319,0.0017900292,0.0051927324,0.0005693735,0.00017518847,0.0000017409079,0.000005391039,0.046555646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99900585,0.00066075526,0.000008475479,0.000055107066,0.000116476556,0.0000013903318,0.0000021740066,0.0000012881129,0.00014846223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987352,0.000110835055,0.00018165493,0.000063609856,0.00035863504,0.00055010436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995964,0.000094636925,0.00012395013,0.00003453134,0.00013211006,0.00001836149],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011819482,0.000044719698,0.00008252146,0.000034751723,0.0004284367,0.000021274029,0.00011432676,0.000021125843,0.0000451971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000109712106,0.000030015344,0.000025260535,0.00023326863,0.00029599958,0.00020056669,0.000010315411,0.00038450808,0.0000057851516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000102827125,0.000006305209,0.08938086,4.2168213e-7,0.000019362278,3.6064674e-7,0.00015846583,0.0002417602,0.00003632904,0.90333766,0.000012076794,0.0067961067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007669662,0.00004837377,0.08499221,0.00009006584,0.000027561651,0.000040591833,0.041431736,0.00024147028,0.000026571455,0.8475487,0.024587402,0.00019834317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91786903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9934852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07561614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024135227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034522876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9709505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908791645","doi":"","title":"Peter Cory at the Supreme Court of Canada: An Introduction","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.023659915940206746,"score_gpt":0.25621665547573036,"score_spread":0.2325567395355236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908791645","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5335468,0.00013236667,0.000030302846,0.05273684,0.00062128913,0.000083381296,0.000003314509,0.000016155667,0.41282958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900895,0.000051761286,0.0000071305635,0.0003521677,0.0006300205,0.0000021097233,0.0000011962544,8.5187355e-7,0.00886528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994948,0.000038462018,0.00006396222,0.00006730899,0.00022995345,0.000105529274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997881,0.00002767453,0.000020931822,0.000053767544,0.0000810024,0.000028489718],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019634269,0.00002787634,0.000046831014,0.000005762295,0.0005946442,0.0000051424786,0.0000703548,0.000012712288,0.0010569162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051564388,0.000017681947,0.000013784927,0.000076733995,0.00036505976,0.000053159463,0.00002032088,0.000023925182,0.0000054617626],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033520486,0.000037131304,0.03616079,9.761702e-7,0.00003117284,0.0000028054528,0.0023550563,0.000035590012,0.00028240544,0.7024282,0.25651255,0.0021197686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039714178,0.000012026262,0.047027286,8.085142e-7,0.000006578483,0.0000013958417,0.0037297197,0.0000028768961,0.00008832418,0.0027233548,0.94632554,0.00004238674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8586782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9941383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6997049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001282042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033947133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909747325","doi":"","title":"Th e Protective Function of the Constitutional Amending Formula","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Parliament; Legislature; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Politics; Power (physics); Enumerated powers; Interpretation (philosophy); Separation of powers; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.05151756309056284,"score_gpt":0.29775353075041033,"score_spread":0.2462359676598475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2909747325","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.102018625,0.00093869836,0.015665635,0.0062660887,0.0036514562,0.0016306366,0.00010189152,0.00013995983,0.869587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988502,0.00014369917,0.00014396114,0.00006897661,0.00049461,0.00006010639,0.0000024095548,0.0000033097479,0.0002326835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987385,0.00009200589,0.0002759164,0.00024531435,0.00038065488,0.00026757244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881446,0.000119785196,0.0003731701,0.00032510233,0.00029979268,0.0000676893],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047570857,0.0001418502,0.00022322506,0.000053459764,0.0073963273,0.000118116615,0.00052858476,0.000102970465,0.00008445983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011710473,0.00011000772,0.00018433286,0.00014104151,0.010978904,0.0004300097,0.00019094576,0.0001688429,0.000026951113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027764825,0.00005355885,0.010611136,0.000013602065,0.00008090592,0.000001817514,0.0006582858,0.000094548275,0.00032370372,0.9868603,0.00009821368,0.0011762165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019477127,0.00013339784,0.13950102,0.0016409468,0.00044422617,0.000036869373,0.013952483,0.00009587121,0.0018717363,0.41903967,0.42029688,0.0010391597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017483233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027471185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89683163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018254078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089098787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9938959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910215669","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Canadian Federal Government: Law and Legal Information","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Law; Political science; Legal research; Public administration","score_opus":0.04347282701125633,"score_gpt":0.3326635457391904,"score_spread":0.28919071872793406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910215669","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000053643413,0.0005656258,0.00000612988,0.025112184,0.0006700675,0.00022647923,0.00028330498,0.000030773113,0.9730518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53910136,0.010300045,0.0001641576,0.02000765,0.0073122513,0.00013576692,0.00012295306,0.000024294171,0.42283154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977455,0.000116695424,0.00021775343,0.0001497919,0.0012349715,0.0005352641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913394,0.00017777117,0.000050120754,0.000081962724,0.00029017104,0.0002660009],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001053604,0.00011734751,0.0001618617,0.00007964325,0.003348189,0.0005228102,0.00022570185,0.00023696433,0.00057711033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033761896,0.00008822794,0.00003903702,0.00013460276,0.0014782832,0.00083173753,0.000110459725,0.00022678675,0.00029727354],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002034919,0.0000013075893,0.00005297478,0.000004231614,0.000015128832,0.0000026044886,0.00028012163,1.8613665e-8,7.7299454e-8,0.64917415,0.3476147,0.002852648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007113485,0.000014578671,0.00016172275,0.00007137601,0.000004405208,8.6691824e-7,0.0040551475,1.8805127e-7,0.000001222487,0.017556608,0.97793025,0.00013250139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98042065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98564583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63161755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091586565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018181247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911209324","doi":"","title":"An Analysis of the \"No Hierarchy of Constitutional Rights\" Doctrine","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Supreme court; Constitution; Hierarchy; Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.019014728724406037,"score_gpt":0.2685540167596146,"score_spread":0.24953928803520856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911209324","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32884428,0.03853031,0.005251187,0.0063370927,0.0062308866,0.0011599094,0.0021113392,0.00011170469,0.6114233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962043,0.0007179406,0.00056829106,0.00006716774,0.00088810286,0.00001813605,0.000064818225,0.0000044870626,0.0014667689],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969882,0.0003868991,0.0010070294,0.00045945434,0.00071105827,0.0004473795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975441,0.00039098805,0.00060009793,0.00043836303,0.0009044312,0.0001220335],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048102858,0.00031024232,0.0008222119,0.0003072361,0.0014885509,0.000038266764,0.00066954613,0.00023527199,0.00079938717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001957975,0.00025213716,0.00073917175,0.0028281177,0.028875861,0.00037160583,0.00012990976,0.00022799901,0.000045274537],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034071814,0.00068713725,0.033729598,0.000056931793,0.0010770119,0.000007385244,0.00040090497,0.015633104,0.00041749227,0.94738436,0.00033527205,0.00023676004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001491726,0.00023191853,0.08372135,0.0012850268,0.0094180005,0.000037894406,0.0025876046,0.00316422,0.0014581386,0.18866546,0.7066562,0.0012824519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028470313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014735888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75871885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002571416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012625966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911565875","doi":"","title":"Selection and Appointment of Clerks in Canadian Jurisdictions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Position (finance); Process (computing); Path (computing); Political science; Public relations; Law; Law and economics; Management; Sociology; Business; Computer science; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Finance","score_opus":0.023147873868524155,"score_gpt":0.29884417459660073,"score_spread":0.2756963007280766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911565875","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14733735,0.19671407,0.000009853081,0.073041975,0.0010849066,0.0025167419,0.00024535207,0.000041324594,0.5790084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9586016,0.037592046,0.000035930563,0.0035480582,0.00013266505,0.000027347352,0.000006253082,0.0000026621158,0.00005347343],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926746,0.000064251835,0.00016180449,0.00011976009,0.00009324219,0.00029351053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994328,0.000013176518,0.000030817406,0.000047364138,0.000060097973,0.00041572648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032473216,0.000059383263,0.00014303948,0.000121740595,0.0004421486,0.000008585034,0.00006278948,0.00003143277,0.0006054656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038611288,0.00006170345,0.00002477247,0.00036240573,0.0003290032,0.000071162554,0.000006412484,0.000053150517,0.000033588833],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000687237,0.000054846798,0.47442073,0.00030742717,0.00015365216,0.000024607316,0.0058256094,0.0000010936974,0.0000112818025,0.20524327,0.09664569,0.21730492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055556837,0.000031383628,0.0249734,0.0005369231,0.000025700048,0.0000017082607,0.00044093528,0.0000022817055,0.000002824128,0.0010057645,0.9728436,0.00007995772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9985355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99994814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8761979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007253611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018695284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6629424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W291190803","doi":"","title":"The Most Dangerous Branch: How the Supreme Court of Canada Has Undermined Our Laws and Our Democracy","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Judicial activism; Judicial review; Politics; Democracy; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Dissenting opinion","score_opus":0.04736306842465549,"score_gpt":0.26593113935701734,"score_spread":0.21856807093236186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W291190803","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12354934,0.09875328,0.000005848806,0.7665704,0.0010097444,0.00021816303,0.000094158786,0.000006063441,0.009793003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98269534,0.014537149,0.00002960742,0.0009998541,0.0008483897,0.000002596215,2.452228e-7,0.0000050284784,0.00088179955],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985965,0.0001304383,0.00027815963,0.00008824344,0.0005196376,0.00038700824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986244,0.00020289706,0.00022059244,0.000059022033,0.00066909747,0.00022398456],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077180075,0.00009729029,0.00026969338,0.000059119426,0.0041348073,0.00017474886,0.0002780702,0.000033729564,0.0000018550925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010374318,0.00007129146,0.00005802784,0.0003014294,0.0005992101,0.0001550876,0.00003852648,0.00018256072,3.692487e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018135734,0.000018786763,0.004219279,0.0000088634615,0.0006871762,0.00025858276,0.004606865,0.000021316446,0.000008035671,0.012660363,0.88455003,0.09294258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034765544,0.000029809036,0.023288846,0.00012946686,0.000077875884,0.0002823176,0.1039094,9.939308e-7,0.000009422153,0.0036837491,0.8681036,0.00013683272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.965077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99988806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.859146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032027095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036272993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912654848","doi":"","title":"IS THE RULE OF LAWTHE GOLDEN RULE? ACCESSING “JUSTICE” FOR CANADA’S POOR","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Rule of law; Charter; Supreme court; Political science; Economic Justice; Due process; Normative; Public law; Sociology; Sources of law; Politics","score_opus":0.0562258748281742,"score_gpt":0.32641494124774106,"score_spread":0.27018906641956686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912654848","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007429062,0.11776028,0.0000054786983,0.72445315,0.0002769787,0.0008185614,0.000118147094,0.000009357886,0.15581511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88952225,0.01854459,0.000038179,0.09008632,0.00046082243,0.000029545065,0.000003840634,0.0000056172385,0.0013088098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990949,0.000087958324,0.00017835363,0.000099417615,0.00024788736,0.00029146683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935883,0.00014337806,0.00008619672,0.00014068435,0.0001389374,0.00013194304],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070240983,0.00007851408,0.00018953563,0.000012369146,0.00190459,0.00003706154,0.00047464407,0.000026384756,0.00018433186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036126812,0.000044328775,0.0000805791,0.00018683058,0.00032667568,0.00004806068,0.000013335729,0.00007155515,0.000012602515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024847573,0.0000056582403,0.00014979442,0.00016574463,0.000046981964,0.000002824747,0.0014965285,0.0000011559738,0.0000025755053,0.67614704,0.25264353,0.06933571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033988515,0.0000047716867,0.0022816528,0.00042443324,0.0001527021,8.0817057e-7,0.00040448603,0.0000013045794,0.0000038140881,0.0095139425,0.9871072,0.00007086873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.989119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8887794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002847823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044857347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912870780","doi":"","title":"Disabusing the Common Law of 'Abuse of Rights': The Only Legitimate Rule Redux","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Reservation of rights; Human rights; Doctrine; Right to property; Autonomy; Obligation; Social rights; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.014911958533964221,"score_gpt":0.28937245069852446,"score_spread":0.27446049216456025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912870780","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8033347,0.002518389,0.00019632447,0.005329844,0.00035443786,0.00014804126,0.000004685075,0.000012905652,0.18810064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980705,0.0010082569,0.000009899339,0.00011215834,0.00060901704,0.0000013279401,2.8945223e-7,0.0000032744072,0.00018528482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984049,0.00017113953,0.00022207209,0.000070765476,0.00037000928,0.0007610776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936223,0.0001255097,0.00019870231,0.00010126817,0.00018614704,0.000026150423],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00163593,0.00006961002,0.00013799687,0.000017240995,0.0023157853,0.00003099576,0.0003951647,0.000033278775,0.00002361771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032070264,0.00003566945,0.00009327817,0.00019654738,0.0029924915,0.00012419945,0.000032685646,0.00043646205,0.000009304246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021512562,0.000031496544,0.000596046,6.0195936e-7,0.00007399811,2.228813e-7,0.003608156,0.0000020484968,0.00006791641,0.9943398,0.00010036192,0.0011578228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012936712,0.00007985805,0.00078067486,0.000030403522,0.000043803193,0.000025122215,0.008528202,0.0000034224938,0.00020416162,0.96785325,0.022264425,0.0000573128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023345374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16003715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19473577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001930454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011386095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913040782","doi":"10.3138/9781487519483-002","title":"Introduction: Judicial Policy Impact in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.0192848742302349,"score_gpt":0.23819661036044293,"score_spread":0.21891173613020803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913040782","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013408017,0.0007663263,0.000003378992,0.00030124624,0.0003534941,0.00015034691,0.000085993,0.000013526075,0.9981916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.033180773,0.001164827,0.00003396451,0.000048357335,0.0044696266,2.169701e-7,0.0000091752345,0.000010365853,0.9610827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908334,0.000029876226,0.00011720348,0.00020585659,0.0003572482,0.00020644916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994521,0.000027497346,0.00013993874,0.00012236966,0.00016804803,0.00009002989],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000091252965,0.00013510542,0.00027649006,0.000025368898,0.00033582648,0.000007053032,0.00027369507,0.00012711377,0.0019463312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023188228,0.00015969922,0.000095157644,0.0000022739923,0.0007850951,0.000076651704,0.00011955938,0.00010382721,0.000005888181],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011165509,0.000007653382,0.00006715227,0.000007779709,0.00016081463,0.000028876526,0.009058073,0.000004474979,0.0000016176416,0.9098724,0.074288204,0.006391309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013351315,0.000024487095,0.000372186,0.00003783956,0.000032808697,3.8840264e-7,0.0005134207,4.4467396e-7,0.000001592795,0.0053775897,0.9933556,0.00015016538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99993545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9190674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037619802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004932642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99896604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913374802","doi":"","title":"All I Really Needed to Know about Federalism, I Learned from Insurance Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Law; Constitutional law; Political science; Constitution; Public law; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.06509475405411932,"score_gpt":0.3207575643447488,"score_spread":0.2556628102906294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913374802","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18476477,0.002263908,0.00063563563,0.06237737,0.0019365054,0.0006738818,0.000199601,0.00030807132,0.74684024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919173,0.0022267215,0.0007679568,0.002969682,0.0012677487,0.00006136333,0.000021381733,0.000011032693,0.00075681944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981133,0.000117562595,0.00035215,0.00051749323,0.00039704173,0.00050250266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985298,0.00019007313,0.00021556378,0.00049381383,0.00028292724,0.0002878063],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039557432,0.00024167086,0.00039317444,0.00005606378,0.006603788,0.0006868839,0.0008350132,0.00016726064,0.00014151837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00094649027,0.0002457138,0.00015679539,0.00011895919,0.0028416398,0.00051067217,0.00024225115,0.00019192358,0.00048658723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000506007,0.000070600414,0.0041339486,0.000006578303,0.00009345065,0.000030850442,0.002866079,0.00008264081,0.00033264185,0.9874063,0.0024969133,0.0024293873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049817015,0.00002571023,0.0114206,0.00039023135,0.000046939942,0.0000031749485,0.003161284,0.000006398267,0.00015559475,0.039805546,0.9440287,0.00045766152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1566541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.124391295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9476008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017668292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004385368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913737857","doi":"","title":"BOOK REVIEW - COMPTE RENDU - AGAINST JUDICIAL ACTIVISM: THE DECLINE OF FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY IN CANADA - APPOINTING JUDGES IN AN AGE OF JUDICIAL POWER: CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Judicial activism; Political science; Power (physics); Law; Judicial review; Politics","score_opus":0.027164084117366375,"score_gpt":0.3120949977601394,"score_spread":0.284930913642773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913737857","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013072365,0.8582416,0.0000026887221,0.11019998,0.00013017587,0.000763496,0.0000344583,0.0000053385897,0.017549857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7546297,0.22935675,0.000014910957,0.015855134,0.00011906124,0.000007962275,0.0000032400415,0.0000058899896,0.0000073549795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99793726,0.00045972836,0.00057189696,0.00020181767,0.00040425934,0.00042501453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987605,0.00055437966,0.00015598262,0.00018089694,0.00015700998,0.0001912208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002814535,0.0001389731,0.0005876106,0.0000662347,0.0005762659,0.000013842795,0.00038256316,0.00004225709,0.00017449344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018889515,0.00009782963,0.00006705412,0.0005187739,0.0015196742,0.00012404913,0.000067179426,0.00027372915,0.0000017248755],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007208329,0.00019177287,0.053766925,0.0028793262,0.00016947502,0.00045574288,0.015202638,0.000010464797,0.000036590514,0.77001697,0.09196987,0.06522814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040548906,0.00006854328,0.21364187,0.018449122,0.00023092584,0.000009918402,0.010236806,0.000007983436,0.0000049390687,0.00696477,0.74945855,0.0005211025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9901323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7630522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058713293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003116973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55993026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914460757","doi":"","title":"Freedom of Expression and the Canadian Charter of Rights","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Individualism; Adjudication; Freedom of expression; Political science; Expression (computer science); Law and economics; Character (mathematics); Law; Human rights; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01105645848648737,"score_gpt":0.22842281636037642,"score_spread":0.21736635787388905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914460757","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61910063,0.03951414,0.00018862284,0.02229232,0.0005261668,0.00032094354,0.000008477623,0.000011834066,0.31803685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99657106,0.0029158804,0.0000061301052,0.000029059282,0.00016902672,9.821284e-7,7.1091165e-8,0.0000010642165,0.00030674753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908704,0.000075934295,0.00011080602,0.000042740223,0.00019048847,0.0004929687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997324,0.00004323769,0.00007289866,0.00003206848,0.00007114303,0.00004829789],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075201195,0.000036122576,0.0000930171,0.000034556535,0.00086748664,0.000010685289,0.00010676187,0.000029259218,0.000073567724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042816428,0.000021011025,0.00003884647,0.000072518415,0.00078926096,0.000057706027,0.000009071729,0.0002528509,0.0000027955832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000084588755,0.000007141378,0.00086288666,3.5644993e-7,0.00002630031,3.0424374e-7,0.002461729,7.223511e-7,0.000031901047,0.99533546,0.00019026255,0.0010744878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058345404,0.00004278156,0.0009071159,0.000023191475,0.000020766414,0.000011551974,0.0032687876,0.000010021825,0.000046735873,0.98125684,0.01377602,0.00005275739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.382331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8882847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50595367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013885449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005723522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6672094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916589643","doi":"","title":"THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE BAR: AN UNWRITTEN CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Supreme court; Independence (probability theory); Legislation; Constitutional right; Government (linguistics); Constitutional law; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0406275365159231,"score_gpt":0.31698606332046025,"score_spread":0.27635852680453715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916589643","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003418599,0.15487343,0.000009000323,0.42831194,0.0004938699,0.0012402241,0.0000754893,0.000024694122,0.41155276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9725991,0.02040557,0.000011797464,0.005995598,0.00027864796,0.000024540454,0.0000011405697,0.0000020864954,0.00068153365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987663,0.00026341612,0.0001866353,0.00010181539,0.0004284533,0.00025335644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992737,0.00010566349,0.00007731231,0.00023904127,0.00016105868,0.0001431777],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014327246,0.00007017433,0.00012179526,0.00000967065,0.0034100986,0.00003476525,0.00072752597,0.000036838224,0.00028025318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047097812,0.000033342774,0.00007861385,0.00021950927,0.003427017,0.00008884793,0.000049175753,0.00015282891,0.00011363367],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.35717e-7,0.000003263076,0.0009782866,0.000007250987,0.000011041832,4.269588e-7,0.00018011288,0.000004024442,4.5856478e-7,0.98789805,0.0028410458,0.008075506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026268981,0.0000032891903,0.006600079,0.00020594358,0.000025841999,0.0000030755411,0.00014666228,0.000001796065,0.0000017149518,0.0057162987,0.98721534,0.00005369442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17711332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9038467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9843743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002307636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030421538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W291686183","doi":"","title":"Judicial Review in Canadian Constitutional Law: A Brief Overview","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œGeorge Washington international law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Law; Political science; Legislation; Charter; Statute; Legitimacy; Judicial activism; Jurisdiction; Judicial independence; Constitution; Legislature; Politics","score_opus":0.033522867881349325,"score_gpt":0.32204463749535595,"score_spread":0.2885217696140066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W291686183","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000046658533,0.29172266,0.000022024818,0.09386054,0.0011265263,0.00080750353,0.000094942116,0.000044037606,0.6122751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.490451,0.3991814,0.00004896285,0.10898576,0.0007144527,0.00017403252,0.00007771593,0.000010448009,0.00035621287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972117,0.00024305792,0.00066648703,0.00035839214,0.00096049876,0.00055986387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988556,0.00014116234,0.00018872967,0.00020448469,0.00035067447,0.00025937104],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021967022,0.00022420479,0.0004650617,0.00006057559,0.0011955544,0.00009667982,0.0008449641,0.0000856096,0.0011980223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040903492,0.0001816226,0.00024824438,0.00050868635,0.0021530278,0.0003761071,0.000112233116,0.00034070903,0.00045776847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026943871,0.000040485957,0.00018329077,0.0002249144,0.000042489657,0.000026679427,0.00008713562,0.00000497825,5.4896213e-7,0.9946781,0.003596556,0.0011121182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019923336,0.000007445816,0.00021486619,0.012595356,0.000054061642,0.000016959726,0.000019941399,5.960685e-7,7.007675e-7,0.082036085,0.9046539,0.00020086463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85144573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9535833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.912642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011398555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018996785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918129775","doi":"10.1017/9781108605991.005","title":"On the Hardingian Renovation of Legal Transplants","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Phenomenon; Proposition; Construct (python library); Law and economics; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Limit (mathematics); Relation (database); Political science; Law; Epistemology; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics; Philosophy; Programming language","score_opus":0.035456725093217775,"score_gpt":0.21901196210874596,"score_spread":0.18355523701552817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918129775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00055366044,0.000045191562,0.000050234376,0.00019003695,0.0002713474,0.00027701913,0.00020495856,0.000027430628,0.9983801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12674019,0.00009650655,0.0000025581292,0.00007437932,0.000099949444,1.8637047e-7,0.000009069543,0.0000057862153,0.87297136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921185,0.000035967907,0.0000999863,0.00017469583,0.00034377442,0.00013375496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999408,0.00014260804,0.00013367904,0.0001409831,0.00014032569,0.00003439321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001536132,0.00012480163,0.00019347515,0.00006130328,0.00048644491,0.000015776044,0.0002905814,0.00014796357,0.000011178954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001633541,0.00011023402,0.00012794773,0.000009541902,0.00066888664,0.000045739896,0.000047491903,0.00019786076,0.000017394721],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005099898,0.000003784909,0.0000028880163,0.00000920804,0.00008403068,0.000012454865,0.00020384205,0.0000012442363,0.000009973059,0.9872283,0.01216691,0.00022641265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013045348,0.00002473976,0.000043579315,0.00017527354,0.000085770065,3.9693745e-7,0.00018273597,9.4577956e-7,0.00005292806,0.00033962322,0.9988272,0.00013631034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002655083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011414214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98688865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010428917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024528903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44952127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2919840808","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqz010","title":"A Conservative Disposition and Constitutional Change","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Disposition; Constitution; Relevance (law); Convention; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06631842434658214,"score_gpt":0.3410341956654997,"score_spread":0.27471577131891756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2919840808","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8786963,0.024529802,0.0002527402,0.020088715,0.0016400303,0.0003264538,0.00001741708,0.000019017512,0.07442948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99210316,0.0064563863,0.00013408158,0.0005389658,0.00052940147,0.000005239358,3.8443733e-7,0.0000016791976,0.00023072802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991472,0.00006828526,0.0002154612,0.00008117321,0.00033553145,0.00015238786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990647,0.00019182706,0.00018345276,0.000025700228,0.00047492143,0.00005940537],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041882688,0.00008113872,0.0002463754,0.000055488665,0.0005651508,0.00003358594,0.000070586684,0.00003082589,0.00003239704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002078211,0.000062043386,0.0000647062,0.00012826537,0.003165784,0.0005142659,0.00004865086,0.000111727284,0.0000069014623],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061818755,0.000025632906,0.04715738,0.000007951301,0.0001996158,0.000018170407,0.0043466073,8.9742554e-7,0.000026444388,0.9454535,0.00056706974,0.0021349087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096303306,0.0003596037,0.058254972,0.00033420994,0.00010883187,0.00007052757,0.02652897,0.0000021945762,0.000027046379,0.036184743,0.8769354,0.00023046942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028062362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030534322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90926874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009147112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015979914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921602097","doi":"","title":"THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA AND TRIBUNALS - DEFERENCE TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS: A RECENT PHENOMENON OR A RETURN TO BASICS?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Scrutiny; Supreme court; Law; Statutory law; Judicial review; Jurisprudence; Appeal; Administrative law; Political science; Standard of review; Judicial opinion","score_opus":0.0904309366278587,"score_gpt":0.33706495871145664,"score_spread":0.24663402208359794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921602097","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056799524,0.0664805,0.000004581368,0.8471725,0.00016613667,0.0020729506,0.0001335247,0.0000070922392,0.07828276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8923031,0.08961047,0.000007212004,0.016654668,0.0001415874,0.00014315438,0.0000013469831,0.0000042808238,0.0011341767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883413,0.00019806254,0.00019394727,0.00012632838,0.00032477034,0.0003227509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998974,0.00023511483,0.000066076114,0.00015149558,0.00025970605,0.0003136004],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012109949,0.00008833431,0.00018434972,0.000010588299,0.001784152,0.00004601217,0.00040807444,0.000016884702,0.00020303624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013393664,0.000039605922,0.000021332815,0.00052296714,0.00031507216,0.000027697923,0.000026530442,0.000084669075,0.0000074346713],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001503837,0.000028638986,0.0030727722,0.0002554277,0.00024761193,0.0000454034,0.028467534,0.0000060113853,0.000001899089,0.5404303,0.24944153,0.17785247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002482309,0.00003292526,0.0012828836,0.00039689994,0.000027583583,0.0000027667515,0.0026366343,2.477827e-7,0.0000011529573,0.00191574,0.99361044,0.000067915345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9409727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88662314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029994673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006905638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922251482","doi":"10.1093/icon/moz082","title":"New Dominion constitutionalism at the twilight of the British Empire: An introduction","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dominion; Constitutionalism; Independence (probability theory); Colonialism; Commonwealth; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; History; Politics; Democracy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.013009220931433522,"score_gpt":0.2890994675627693,"score_spread":0.27609024663133575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922251482","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38317627,0.0033422476,0.0034660995,0.17411883,0.042687364,0.0009367941,0.00028095557,0.000051921368,0.39193952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931848,0.00013466495,0.00019240918,0.0010223495,0.003558488,0.0000025527086,0.000011975559,0.000003507093,0.001889235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997207,0.00020072376,0.00058731105,0.00017433097,0.0016529687,0.00017769713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99759066,0.0002223385,0.0005526441,0.00014888654,0.0013778579,0.00010761896],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089538307,0.000116875846,0.0002136224,0.0000507893,0.0012376143,0.00018838895,0.00084955845,0.00008676514,0.0013968657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033647675,0.00008211246,0.00026386598,0.00019813198,0.0049841614,0.0006492047,0.00014943256,0.0002338314,0.00004998592],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000113989096,0.00006548726,0.0051845904,0.0000014141731,0.00016671703,0.000007646937,0.00022450341,0.00046173626,0.00049761817,0.9807714,0.011547516,0.00095733115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000744906,0.000036494246,0.0054706526,0.00008889283,0.000046555735,0.0004443964,0.00031316804,0.000003565312,0.0006533614,0.054731403,0.93734884,0.00011776503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038437126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066493256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92604005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037281704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021359338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922383890","doi":"10.18572/1813-1247-2019-2-50-53","title":"THE MECHANISM OF DEMARCATION OF JURISDICTIONS BETWEEN FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES AND PROVINCIAL ONES IN CANADA","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"STATE POWER AND LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mechanism (biology); Government (linguistics); Public administration; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.005141928347993043,"score_gpt":0.21175063360010316,"score_spread":0.20660870525211011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922383890","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98083764,0.00033592948,0.0005376777,0.0010887986,0.00022813822,0.0003406905,0.00019560466,0.0000060704615,0.016429417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993952,0.0003944059,0.000023293358,0.000025530075,0.000023921286,0.0000082409415,5.573624e-7,0.0000024262179,0.00012644532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853575,0.00005849364,0.00021581103,0.00011610109,0.0009072216,0.00016660144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996431,0.00014508032,0.0000896523,0.00004503375,0.000027492291,0.0000496812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028660338,0.00007300937,0.0001459745,0.0000040971845,0.0003296938,0.000016086426,0.0000614528,0.000023564839,0.000010509632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019236972,0.00005530099,0.000019008357,0.000055363063,0.00020000753,0.000059837268,0.00006878411,0.000058194935,3.1877155e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012319417,0.00009997282,0.40944505,0.000052497347,0.00015011927,0.0000020721416,0.015321672,0.000020052155,0.00008379739,0.5557307,0.0001295532,0.018841313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008946626,0.00035857953,0.8410355,0.00010241153,0.000065000946,6.93719e-7,0.09925513,0.00015832884,0.0013308837,0.03282741,0.023645462,0.00032594346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6629494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8545158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5229033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068971235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038430438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33929506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2925510742","doi":"10.4000/ethiquepublique.3837","title":"Désobéissance civile et dénonciation gouvernementale : le cas d’Edward Snowden","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Éthique Publique","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02024135231674861,"score_gpt":0.29970796330431015,"score_spread":0.27946661098756154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2925510742","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04190877,0.005280409,0.002345253,0.24154279,0.004169399,0.00052762777,0.00009299137,0.0001801559,0.7039526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9643811,0.0015298389,0.00042951576,0.019539855,0.002967333,0.000091569425,0.000022404949,0.000019775833,0.011018614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973306,0.0006204448,0.00037773713,0.0004665047,0.0005624886,0.00064221135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848443,0.0002147891,0.0002301133,0.00020233278,0.00066079875,0.00020755643],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001669434,0.00025105305,0.00029167577,0.00007848511,0.0013925742,0.00018050442,0.00038555922,0.00037068268,0.00092769915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006421965,0.00027917247,0.00014780785,0.000693405,0.0022650117,0.0011194656,0.00021713793,0.0003965531,0.00079797267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016202765,0.0001713419,0.0048598945,0.000015378168,0.00006817754,0.000008935696,0.005949511,0.000003459322,0.00008366905,0.92586786,0.059232775,0.0037228228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002648087,0.00012355456,0.013720626,0.00010943101,0.000029860452,0.0000059896506,0.0023897693,0.000034541223,0.0006022418,0.15121838,0.8311593,0.0003415178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07682895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18164259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9224723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083048333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019412794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2926525404","doi":"10.7202/1058196ar","title":"Expanding the Parameters of Participatory Public Law: A Democratic Right to Public Participation and the State’s Duty of Public Consultation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Duty; Deliberative democracy; Citizen journalism; Public participation; Political science; Law; Liberalism; State (computer science); Public administration; Public law; Deliberation; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.07749659188114771,"score_gpt":0.32268579658395175,"score_spread":0.24518920470280403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2926525404","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9456212,0.00025354864,0.00019104918,0.015357029,0.0003110004,0.00043314035,0.000016039909,0.000013516247,0.0378035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99925256,0.00009388178,0.00005989505,0.00048102497,0.00004339557,0.000035382225,8.6587e-7,0.000004419565,0.000028567049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977609,0.0007551323,0.00045828754,0.00012333343,0.0005551999,0.00034713937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980768,0.0008463172,0.00034109328,0.00010686889,0.00046762527,0.00016129714],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002868155,0.000093748844,0.00023547842,0.000057060755,0.0031741525,0.00015259426,0.00021460313,0.000038371567,0.00006884024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010494695,0.000052675405,0.00007608851,0.00034692412,0.0016635204,0.0005127378,0.000062025894,0.00014956013,0.000009443264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036508878,0.000046975627,0.006042736,0.0000061361584,0.00010059236,7.427255e-7,0.005209975,0.000029124336,0.00007075887,0.9860022,0.000041752548,0.002412476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008934863,0.0007248282,0.04621853,0.00033969007,0.00043942864,0.000037969126,0.07042675,0.0007349662,0.0038597062,0.66912645,0.19812007,0.0010367255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004528368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03754583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31687576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000075933945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007471216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W293323243","doi":"","title":"Looking Abroad When Interpreting the U.S. Constitution: Some Reflections","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas international law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitution; Supreme court; Principal (computer security); Subject (documents); Political science; Constitutional law; Relevance (law); Perplexity; Sociology","score_opus":0.029276174189634734,"score_gpt":0.3500193444613795,"score_spread":0.32074317027174476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W293323243","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032912877,0.00063573715,0.003951667,0.044527143,0.00405757,0.00009880541,0.000007415787,0.00006925283,0.9433611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99271536,0.0002742267,0.0006009948,0.0026926408,0.0030856212,0.0000056229183,0.0000018930973,0.000004271098,0.00061936444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985643,0.000087452434,0.00029334135,0.00013862352,0.0006589891,0.0002572858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992451,0.00011466004,0.00015677401,0.0000704811,0.0003209133,0.00009206993],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007619713,0.00010273382,0.00010385025,0.00006369512,0.004042765,0.00034688518,0.0004971636,0.000055332875,0.0007004573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003137896,0.00007628983,0.0001303365,0.000106880725,0.0014212119,0.0005925833,0.00009334977,0.00041510834,0.00017260312],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012945038,0.00003147011,0.0005511119,3.7452736e-7,0.000090398935,0.000017750566,0.0017770624,0.00030683982,0.000022637181,0.9956364,0.00072332576,0.0008296827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021141768,0.0000136479985,0.000300278,0.00007710479,0.000015831672,0.000120877005,0.0013261999,0.0000030830538,0.000040350715,0.4835797,0.5142244,0.00008707428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008186792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010823044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98942405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005606878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003523581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2934581520","doi":"10.7202/1058195ar","title":"Cabinet Immunity in Canada: The Legal Black Hole","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Constitution; Principle of legality; Constitutionality; Judicial review; Statutory law; Separation of powers; Jurisprudence; Sociology","score_opus":0.019515672917165435,"score_gpt":0.24858846533777462,"score_spread":0.22907279242060918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2934581520","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3083154,0.0001476124,6.0636125e-7,0.0058747097,0.00054618437,0.00006789598,0.00001051769,0.000004121238,0.68503296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99875003,0.00009672949,0.0000044920403,0.0006772246,0.0001797902,0.0000011096724,3.4094532e-7,0.0000021062021,0.00028816063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907553,0.00014193506,0.0001390551,0.000059472168,0.00034458414,0.00023941338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996835,0.0000759034,0.000052328684,0.00006021955,0.00006912556,0.000058953185],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005041636,0.00005430446,0.00009882544,0.000012040138,0.0029166266,0.000036159396,0.00023127817,0.000021357237,0.0002673483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046185232,0.000036263733,0.000035219353,0.00013013165,0.0002813496,0.0001302704,0.000043748936,0.00029932093,0.000057010184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009430579,0.000014536506,0.0097753825,7.1585026e-7,0.000016783739,0.000023849949,0.00032843975,0.00035442374,0.000006350317,0.9876164,0.0010258617,0.00082780403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016641752,0.000010212272,0.025129214,0.000013541114,0.0000043930363,0.0000050416074,0.0062200413,0.000010114948,0.00001103735,0.0028500685,0.96550906,0.000070863454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9969361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98476636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005050383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034842757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99838144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2936308905","doi":"10.1515/sem-2019-0005","title":"“Do you understand these charges?”: How procedural communication in youth criminal justice court violates the rights of young offenders in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Semiotica","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Law; Criminology; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Political science; Government (linguistics); Procedural justice; Jargon; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.03728193686307406,"score_gpt":0.26644091481551485,"score_spread":0.22915897795244078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2936308905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9629556,0.0006090876,0.000004168019,0.009552401,0.00019176157,0.00029461636,0.000019169329,0.0000070163496,0.026366206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99950224,0.00023217921,0.000012878075,0.00013778592,0.000032368294,0.000002890752,0.000003989355,0.0000029149214,0.00007276976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896127,0.00016663864,0.00014677543,0.00013026173,0.0003526931,0.00024234138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993708,0.0002809534,0.000082899984,0.00014281095,0.00008645407,0.000036052938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004996573,0.000083376755,0.00016134488,0.00003541247,0.00026667243,0.000027352326,0.0002978536,0.000044073437,0.000025455874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019897499,0.000058967777,0.000024467765,0.0002453111,0.0003912699,0.000117096315,0.000048753103,0.00017828424,0.0000029581856],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012587475,0.0001097709,0.21627344,0.00009488522,0.00006571764,0.000006102066,0.23843303,0.00018845934,0.00008307759,0.543566,0.0008705725,0.00018304058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004865741,0.000029584982,0.08729003,0.00031663934,0.000115931325,0.0000012369836,0.8916389,0.0002749764,0.00007166773,0.01886446,0.0006773564,0.0002326439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89084613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9817191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6532059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043205172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00097483635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2404636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2941302010","doi":"10.3138/ijcs.57.x.71","title":"Morality Politics of Physician-Assisted Suicide: Comparing Canada and the United States","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Politics; Federalism; Public opinion; Supreme Court Decisions; Assisted suicide","score_opus":0.11213562162037746,"score_gpt":0.34194504174025325,"score_spread":0.2298094201198758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2941302010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79272854,0.0034903823,0.000009527484,0.19649188,0.00059937494,0.00007055649,0.00007132549,0.0000036139434,0.0065347822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935758,0.0014997954,0.000020597456,0.0045222156,0.00035900623,7.233845e-7,0.0000020660277,0.0000019633794,0.000017834314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989574,0.00008893488,0.000285672,0.000051790303,0.00048064662,0.00013555119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981704,0.00029789098,0.00021462778,0.000023429613,0.0011438362,0.00014986628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025564583,0.0000621095,0.00023324668,0.000114918366,0.00033209345,0.000026014955,0.00023163676,0.000012911893,0.0000046104474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006394965,0.0000441478,0.00004664381,0.00027378267,0.00093445316,0.000066376786,0.000041690197,0.00009455798,2.7837345e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013599292,0.000017982815,0.07205577,0.000013380288,0.0023669444,0.00010917686,0.026304796,0.0005270978,0.0000090167005,0.8734887,0.023328349,0.0016427432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025285317,0.00007119092,0.18546829,0.0002624921,0.00025897345,0.000016417427,0.16718315,0.00021270917,0.0000919147,0.032315116,0.61127645,0.00031474986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99454844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99661446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84117365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025454577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001169405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34430316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943648049","doi":"10.14288/1.0378561","title":"Law's meanings for equality in the Americas : less impoverished visions for Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vision; Political science; Sociology; Geography; Anthropology","score_opus":0.021142343597196724,"score_gpt":0.23643100391503047,"score_spread":0.21528866031783375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943648049","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9730587,0.00006635438,0.00028860447,0.0014567301,0.0001850353,0.00064145174,0.00030623047,0.000012532634,0.023984386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99922174,0.000027983606,0.00008978946,0.00035604954,0.00003482062,0.0000026546763,0.0000077533605,0.0000023574653,0.0002568763],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926364,0.000049761722,0.00007641546,0.00017004731,0.00023630871,0.00020379752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940264,0.00025355408,0.00007091331,0.000082158425,0.00015183489,0.00003888827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039439797,0.000023084,0.0001593306,0.000007710166,0.00078773126,0.000046921232,0.0002855895,0.000037785016,0.000025158497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006951279,0.000060012917,0.000077004224,0.00017456242,0.00038961755,0.00013326744,0.000043764365,0.000048946677,0.0000012430193],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019783888,0.00064086233,0.22365649,0.00027686817,0.00030209066,0.00006328835,0.028714752,0.000065756714,0.00016176168,0.09719769,0.097070605,0.551652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064309034,0.000047342342,0.86454844,0.000051233517,0.000021255788,9.2708797e-7,0.07050995,0.000024279281,1.2194465e-7,0.008515823,0.055508118,0.0001294241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9982695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99981904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64089197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013252358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044161463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60586715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943671348","doi":"10.17648/eidea-18-2283","title":"A retórica da qualificação e as controvérsias de rotulagem","year":2019,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Eletrônica de Estudos Integrados em Discurso e Argumentação","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030945797899959385,"score_gpt":0.33248299701666845,"score_spread":0.30153719911670906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943671348","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.884499,0.021713294,0.002439432,0.0216267,0.0023318613,0.005166561,0.00034742148,0.0005919914,0.061283708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759451,0.003002426,0.00021333387,0.003346203,0.00073546026,0.0002511166,0.000056582845,0.00010320683,0.016346533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.990928,0.001453714,0.0015442617,0.0016524991,0.0019586482,0.0024628828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956684,0.0009562528,0.0008426135,0.0011965305,0.00034968264,0.000986513],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030412371,0.0011233042,0.0018027733,0.00027976005,0.0017550985,0.0011594356,0.0020312231,0.00057976117,0.0022925858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013748179,0.0010013668,0.0011784353,0.0016519588,0.0012749683,0.00054038473,0.00064522756,0.0014510243,0.005271814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068869634,0.0018313581,0.058247875,0.0002810026,0.0018118176,0.0002553529,0.03772885,0.000013438889,0.0015218436,0.8514964,0.028841443,0.017281903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006606918,0.0027679282,0.027962063,0.004086138,0.0024368365,0.0001538294,0.33159676,0.00074945204,0.00034049366,0.030455953,0.5879799,0.0048637087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063726925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074599497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82104045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002476114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019831487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943983938","doi":"10.1515/9781773855714-012","title":"10 Stormy “Whethers”: Ethical Challenges of a Clinician in Academia","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Original jurisdiction; Political science; Court of record; Law of the case; Appeal; Tribunal; Certiorari; Remand (court procedure); Discretion; Court of equity; Precedent","score_opus":0.07598239443720001,"score_gpt":0.28938048534260236,"score_spread":0.21339809090540235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943983938","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000040143193,0.0051262053,0.0000050852605,0.00058587047,0.00012639741,0.00019165386,0.000025739972,0.000031884258,0.99386704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010775364,0.0054857098,0.000051382038,0.00007302587,0.00015809295,3.9076622e-7,0.0000024479966,0.000013210976,0.9834404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986993,0.00007225726,0.0002202827,0.00026601812,0.0005727694,0.00016939218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926364,0.00021943804,0.00016521727,0.00011625515,0.00016106165,0.00007437693],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057488185,0.00014967384,0.00043036265,0.00012368216,0.0001463637,0.0000040699038,0.00035986747,0.0018870789,0.0002947606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004994748,0.00017082378,0.0002041969,0.000010248061,0.0020612094,0.000030037505,0.00023481157,0.0017597483,0.000031236632],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010032861,0.000008879327,0.0000024332835,0.000066542634,0.000112052425,0.00004139894,0.007400492,5.684321e-7,0.000001208055,0.9793325,0.000472541,0.012461028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016267716,0.00005239252,0.000029840474,0.00052563497,0.00009845392,2.477177e-7,0.0010263677,0.0000025761112,0.0000026157686,0.0870745,0.91087306,0.00015164078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010050809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02339457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9104005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013128502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003909885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99940866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944179347","doi":"10.1017/s0003055400400572","title":"The Politics of Pragmatism: Women, Representation, and Constitutionalism in Canada. By Alexandra Dobrowolsky. Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford University Press, 2000. 320p. $24.75 paper.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Politics; Representation (politics); Pragmatism; Political science; Economic history; Sociology; Economics; Law; Philosophy; Democracy","score_opus":0.014677506223990775,"score_gpt":0.27515452127969314,"score_spread":0.26047701505570237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944179347","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44626573,0.07799409,0.00008617091,0.12815954,0.0006174512,0.0018555115,0.00027003305,0.000055061613,0.34469643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90324867,0.093159914,0.000043412954,0.0026253082,0.000032994183,0.000010691638,0.0000026089472,0.0000020468062,0.00087433256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767995,0.00019071766,0.00030907724,0.00026971445,0.00071013963,0.000840421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986107,0.0005222475,0.00013936606,0.00014962844,0.00016980343,0.00040827383],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075134577,0.00010892844,0.00030997695,0.000024644203,0.0011369669,0.00003354245,0.0003671099,0.00001859769,0.000067566914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011467078,0.00008406128,0.00003280752,0.0008791232,0.010654527,0.00027313756,0.00010997749,0.00012181901,7.685501e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004121207,0.000021543976,0.035319418,0.00001676328,0.0000087471835,0.000007702741,0.00030926047,3.9613994e-7,0.0000028001502,0.957831,0.00322743,0.0032508126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009838666,0.000018805893,0.047126025,0.00021402312,0.000017908162,0.000007819361,0.0046551614,0.0000016112897,0.0000027926185,0.0065368954,0.941192,0.00012857623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99612015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9683514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9512941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002606982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008021205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944477221","doi":"10.36646/mjlr.18.1.rights","title":"Rights and Judges in a Democracy: A New Canadian Version","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law reform; Political science; Democracy; Law; Criminology; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.008673878071632155,"score_gpt":0.22287664739559415,"score_spread":0.21420276932396198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944477221","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67471135,0.00030300306,0.000009486103,0.008100407,0.00008717677,0.000031112286,0.0000025783156,0.0000019407018,0.31675297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987168,0.00015920727,0.00015841081,0.00010793273,0.000025915835,2.427462e-9,2.2954363e-7,4.7183664e-7,0.00083103136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99964356,0.000022578086,0.00008359433,0.000043683583,0.00010573107,0.00010085969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996988,0.000021374659,0.00006430822,0.000023928982,0.00008140051,0.00011018598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001750855,0.000034654062,0.000114938826,0.00014101574,0.00045858193,0.000005758846,0.00012416102,0.000038897255,0.0000319168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000141509345,0.000031453164,0.000036092042,0.00013218774,0.00032069394,0.00015092416,0.00002419116,0.000081210535,0.0000015813833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010649668,0.000024344423,0.0119425235,0.000005485214,0.00006443114,0.000087916866,0.020870175,0.0000032122978,0.000031464846,0.9646108,0.0008017097,0.0014514419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001239176,0.00007929136,0.036129624,0.00027532587,0.00006036434,0.000006436402,0.025453778,0.0000019654776,0.00006632142,0.16251792,0.7740646,0.00010518627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7665214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9718033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80209285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002119287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006828653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35270876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944752172","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1326","title":"Constitutional Cases 2015: An Overview","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Premise; Charter; Scope (computer science); Law; Federalism; Political science; Economic Justice; Constitutional law; Roberts Court; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.1288022743471286,"score_gpt":0.3887176382874412,"score_spread":0.2599153639403126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944752172","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029129878,0.6682197,0.00017337482,0.046732415,0.0007747751,0.000653884,0.00013275142,0.00017318502,0.28284863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48686907,0.5043788,0.00010678945,0.0073769507,0.00067231857,0.00006272668,0.000009736037,0.0000048315123,0.00051880773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998491,0.00022221029,0.00025977593,0.00024173768,0.00048563545,0.0002996578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991313,0.00018382247,0.00007446634,0.00017554055,0.0002635244,0.00017131964],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007455974,0.00012882303,0.00029518246,0.00000998554,0.00087486376,0.000026345708,0.00024089932,0.000049126353,0.0026882119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040886557,0.000082967825,0.00012353291,0.00015799842,0.0028100887,0.00041239872,0.00005416975,0.00005211868,0.0007752027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024085075,0.000032465374,0.0003274751,0.00006526555,0.000018494471,0.000013813053,0.000023305467,2.8997649e-8,0.000008259849,0.9770721,0.013867879,0.0085685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009935657,0.000021529942,0.00016440173,0.0021879168,0.000052654912,0.000012806258,0.000023229988,3.9196085e-8,0.0000042846073,0.020983098,0.9762955,0.00015519853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038979317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074315392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9624276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010476879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036082798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944851300","doi":"","title":"Canadian Rights: A jurisprudential Canadian “Style”?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fundamental rights; Charter; Political science; Law; Human rights; International human rights law; Federalism; Reservation of rights; Law and economics; Rights of Nature; Linguistic rights; Right to property; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.0099812534809071,"score_gpt":0.27586362770013045,"score_spread":0.26588237421922334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944851300","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.420027,0.0003299599,0.0000019086933,0.01890908,0.0013877382,0.00025579674,0.00036528267,0.000047592366,0.55867565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944379,0.000052478816,0.000059142345,0.0014138996,0.0007528923,0.0000037637956,0.00004697582,0.0000040169234,0.0032289375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893785,0.000036120447,0.00010538041,0.00016608281,0.00023320733,0.0005213443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992661,0.000021801465,0.000022700002,0.00009221897,0.00009198463,0.0005051842],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015694587,0.00007984481,0.00011358421,0.00012235717,0.0009801342,0.000048222548,0.00020817727,0.00008056016,0.0017512328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003900701,0.00007526349,0.00004887555,0.0002495758,0.00015511064,0.00009893671,0.00001802413,0.000102088874,0.0012938452],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008553114,0.000055530534,0.054387763,0.000003620606,0.000060916656,0.00007855571,0.0031086667,0.0000073791584,0.000017446706,0.9205976,0.017854106,0.003819846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010643162,0.00001102385,0.017297145,0.000011938722,0.000008919387,7.897718e-7,0.0008073683,0.0000072180082,0.0000019368747,0.0036178452,0.97800314,0.00012621701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9991854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96014905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005059032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021084643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99948376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945852264","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Form of Government: Reconciling Parliamentary Sovereignty and Executive Dominance under a System of Constitutional Supremacy","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Parliamentary sovereignty; Law; Politics; Separation of powers; Government (linguistics); Sovereignty; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04790771194960826,"score_gpt":0.29581992758801046,"score_spread":0.2479122156384022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945852264","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2874903,0.00071860856,0.000563189,0.0008997695,0.0007042583,0.001398766,0.0008356316,0.000033907687,0.70735556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99951345,0.00015150526,0.00003350271,0.000023210387,0.000052620006,0.00002462265,0.000019153878,0.0000021076512,0.00017985978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965219,0.00020620387,0.00047763454,0.00018021445,0.002151895,0.00046214444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99777675,0.0005058452,0.00029069177,0.00015568145,0.0010698512,0.00020119555],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020689557,0.00013756721,0.00028080036,0.00021982318,0.003934783,0.000091545975,0.00035234194,0.00010117237,0.00003635945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019359998,0.00011743317,0.00009525352,0.0006185521,0.0038168237,0.0014044133,0.00018774971,0.000204085,0.00004861814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013052522,0.000014361357,0.013993949,0.00011939705,0.00015231699,0.0000032580958,0.0037202411,0.00016482623,0.000004394208,0.98047566,0.00021770717,0.0010033415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035268848,0.0001970213,0.062548324,0.0018232585,0.00009107764,0.000037211954,0.82417816,0.0011522061,0.000098374585,0.0051404457,0.10072077,0.00048628746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15294896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.110585116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97533524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003889262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003034431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946685998","doi":"10.17072/1995-4190-2018-42-558-586","title":"ON LEGAL DEFECTS AND LEGAL DEFECTOLOGY","year":2018,"lang":"ru","type":"article","venue":"Вестник Пермского университета Юридические науки","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Political science; Business; Medicine","score_opus":0.020232993343168252,"score_gpt":0.29306776981049937,"score_spread":0.2728347764673311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946685998","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5700537,0.0040198616,0.00012203094,0.006362748,0.0048829773,0.00073696394,0.00010668134,0.000280964,0.4134341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836357,0.0011020326,0.0001045137,0.004440112,0.0048045507,0.000062527964,0.000018355515,0.00006808039,0.0057640835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935322,0.00071519054,0.0008678749,0.0016016955,0.0013054559,0.0019775797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99668884,0.001019869,0.00039765908,0.00062371005,0.000523884,0.00074600836],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010886481,0.00093588495,0.001135572,0.00036720425,0.0041116043,0.00050447974,0.00080112414,0.0007385321,0.0018869017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001125108,0.0009066744,0.00042010777,0.0011596011,0.0075813024,0.0006877969,0.0006020665,0.0009016809,0.0039620884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004524614,0.0004130177,0.0052212896,0.00004458915,0.00030941996,0.00027455683,0.002380092,0.0000050615495,0.00040473376,0.9583096,0.021273974,0.010911212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026003278,0.0031334232,0.028089393,0.00050032145,0.00055407896,0.0001937533,0.0038658415,0.00007477421,0.0012781589,0.071769685,0.88574517,0.0021950628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013431582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02214107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88653994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035702586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009421361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946696988","doi":"","title":"Refractive and Prismatic Analysis in Implicit Comparative Constitutional Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional law; Law; Section (typography); Comparative law; Political science; Law and economics; Common law; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03598531139458209,"score_gpt":0.35768702638174826,"score_spread":0.32170171498716615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946696988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82309896,0.00029971616,0.000121507335,0.0015662279,0.00006516277,0.00018538172,0.00005551346,0.000017192966,0.17459035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990657,0.00004462408,0.0002509316,0.00034606975,0.000060180715,0.000005722125,0.00002603202,8.5578506e-7,0.00019989956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930704,0.00006621039,0.00013939478,0.00015585395,0.00018992042,0.00014161227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996131,0.00016673902,0.000052583873,0.00005002937,0.00007386111,0.000043678796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017381713,0.00006575046,0.00022789108,0.00007379875,0.00023900844,0.000019750263,0.000061662875,0.000038739712,0.00012405607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031723797,0.000058522855,0.000039204962,0.0004848027,0.0010607508,0.00013098704,0.000033737884,0.00008914423,0.000046758505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012273051,0.000072351046,0.057486933,0.0000015695662,0.00011547442,0.0000018926424,0.0022204104,0.00006977028,0.000029681953,0.93987405,0.000028959506,0.000086638014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001180041,0.00008829445,0.76609427,0.00007832785,0.0003406167,0.000002398102,0.030583447,0.0009550819,0.000032260614,0.10910528,0.09102581,0.00051419454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007998527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054575074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83076876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007052378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010623469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946936291","doi":"10.7202/1059410ar","title":"LA SUPRÉMATIE DES DROITS ET LIBERTÉS DE LA PERSONNE ET LA QUESTION CONSTITUTIONNELLE AU CANADA","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010249393386095701,"score_gpt":0.2630690891841845,"score_spread":0.2528196957980888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946936291","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49189976,0.002056073,0.00034647287,0.004271173,0.0006116501,0.00018186444,0.0000754111,0.000045434692,0.5005122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876171,0.0021643871,0.0005932127,0.00070285384,0.00047769176,0.000028194441,0.000021477557,0.000017187707,0.008377949],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99693424,0.001495716,0.00027639794,0.0003319348,0.00033110305,0.0006306008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812233,0.0012308405,0.00013041937,0.00014932943,0.00012427427,0.00024277646],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020521807,0.0001936594,0.00034045248,0.000051888033,0.0006867992,0.00011584032,0.0002481089,0.0003159952,0.00030114577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005471754,0.0002759209,0.00013335513,0.00037406822,0.0021448801,0.00036457,0.00008505493,0.00045419825,0.00015734238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015746533,0.0000993209,0.0376688,0.00013707104,0.000074169366,0.00011900551,0.0077755596,0.00065915944,0.000056472625,0.94975394,0.0011628036,0.0024779513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009954845,0.00010680282,0.08299087,0.0023168682,0.00022696484,0.00063044456,0.012132956,0.00050399627,0.00007290229,0.4198991,0.4791854,0.0009382134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8311681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7960787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52985483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00189597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005220552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947185286","doi":"10.7202/1059229ar","title":"Growing Pains and Other Things: The Supreme Court of Canada and the Supreme Court of the United States","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Original jurisdiction; Certiorari; Political science; Institution; Majority opinion; Supreme Court Decisions","score_opus":0.01286390832678744,"score_gpt":0.22254052298883437,"score_spread":0.20967661466204693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947185286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9722375,0.00051731104,0.000009012254,0.0137827005,0.00011960274,0.00028441756,0.000033511762,0.000007532973,0.013008402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99785066,0.0002532463,0.0000101239375,0.0014322846,0.000069297144,0.0000055077703,0.0000011221019,0.0000045721267,0.00037319175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999101,0.00017704123,0.00016244917,0.000102975384,0.00026244565,0.0001941224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990999,0.00053674803,0.00011104174,0.00013067172,0.00008814686,0.000033490593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009169548,0.00006162528,0.0001721485,0.000015635036,0.00047891485,0.000021878317,0.00023990593,0.000034887944,0.000024236473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020889993,0.00004018704,0.000044390697,0.0001972754,0.0010202354,0.00007108434,0.00008078326,0.00010645357,5.7232273e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006487257,0.00002467355,0.26681313,0.00007182036,0.00019644348,0.0000019250463,0.043631725,0.0002680655,0.00024608732,0.6865736,0.0017805039,0.00032715002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027303777,0.00010602101,0.21986352,0.0009748956,0.00040389056,0.000024628678,0.187468,0.0025876954,0.0007346516,0.3961581,0.1882297,0.0007185424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72675043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4720538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2904155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000062892985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002487505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53757983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947263645","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0030","title":"Access to <i>Charter</i> Justice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitutionalism; Principle of legality; Political science; Economic Justice; Law; Constitutional law; Intervention (counseling); Law and economics; Sociology; Democracy; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.07309585026656665,"score_gpt":0.29028857881969994,"score_spread":0.2171927285531333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947263645","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000131129245,0.000062257364,0.00011645586,0.00050124177,0.0006994759,0.00037216445,0.00012533365,0.00009633584,0.9980136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026907006,0.0005944285,0.000034957175,0.00039759802,0.0006403708,0.0000011132548,0.0000053844947,0.000012363823,0.9956231],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988281,0.00002467357,0.00010064027,0.00034547478,0.00040322868,0.00029786525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999062,0.000059946913,0.000159223,0.00029467553,0.00020280806,0.00022132824],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000120349396,0.00020897221,0.00027781358,0.00008410345,0.0025531678,0.00019507324,0.0011932984,0.00024097112,0.00007186575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035477642,0.00024260479,0.00014076842,0.0000046152336,0.0007397181,0.00020360741,0.0006906969,0.00022597676,0.000013509925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039870054,0.000004369424,0.0000057627635,0.000012210936,0.00007146672,0.000071380666,0.000793454,9.415403e-7,7.199786e-7,0.976776,0.016202785,0.006021048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001250353,0.000017516943,0.000023397908,0.000111913534,0.00025088186,5.102952e-7,0.0001613769,2.2536479e-7,0.0000030449871,0.0076996456,0.99131376,0.00029270802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003293399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004112044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97511095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017517779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028640334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947879797","doi":"10.24908/iqurcp.13296","title":"Debating the Supreme Court of Canada's Role in Governing Minority Groups with the Charter","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Inquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Political science; Constitution; Legislature; Politics; Democracy; Separation of powers; Judicial review; Sociology","score_opus":0.05325250732231088,"score_gpt":0.31854142160180643,"score_spread":0.2652889142794955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947879797","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79434305,0.00012125064,0.000023180102,0.105064854,0.000085050546,0.0006392673,0.000005014107,0.000017790515,0.099700555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987327,0.00013993624,0.000013318891,0.00012457966,0.00018762628,0.00006144915,0.0000010388264,0.000006369121,0.0007330057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99677324,0.00016287266,0.00022709914,0.00029101357,0.001830408,0.00071535655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99800307,0.00056356785,0.00012557236,0.00011156209,0.001106671,0.000089589565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028152266,0.00013173366,0.00021946912,0.00006442683,0.0010928203,0.00016615649,0.00067771325,0.000058859816,0.00003645381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044369666,0.00007644135,0.000032014494,0.00072994246,0.0018041909,0.00028653027,0.00020081399,0.0005868439,0.000012400615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008533439,0.000036859987,0.22372244,0.000038825532,0.000053726642,0.0000032661728,0.031515244,0.000006556964,0.000535919,0.7391692,0.003711253,0.0011214156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011009239,0.00038373287,0.18364348,0.0007225314,0.000034261022,0.0000059127733,0.5844032,0.0008941652,0.0006207322,0.15632129,0.07117583,0.000693914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7138394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7031051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5828479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036230587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024806552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8405201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948255521","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198827580.013.11","title":"Proportionality and Limitations on Freedom of Speech","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Premise; Adjudication; Appeal; Freedom of expression; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Human rights; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.07223746628615864,"score_gpt":0.2518485576328827,"score_spread":0.1796110913467241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948255521","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027574407,0.00012919029,0.000021068894,0.00021788706,0.0001074598,0.00017255104,0.00010088796,0.000023093191,0.9989521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017999647,0.0014564132,0.00018994496,0.00003107335,0.00016851006,4.700982e-7,0.00001868899,0.0000054559537,0.9801298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992497,0.000030364201,0.00010469531,0.00019270749,0.00032102133,0.00010153925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932665,0.00013950552,0.00012891975,0.00009476088,0.00024903158,0.00006114923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009791389,0.000103995975,0.00019058924,0.00004885732,0.00048601697,0.000013796152,0.00011702529,0.00014448231,0.000031451476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005326568,0.00011690187,0.000087134096,0.000008523512,0.0010896224,0.000037939582,0.000112567264,0.00013645823,3.7568753e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020495243,0.000009175027,0.000023345294,0.00001029283,0.00008072572,0.000024479912,0.0003806161,0.0000013066297,0.0000016013162,0.9927772,0.00035832144,0.0063123894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010786721,0.000023759767,0.00015536003,0.00008365617,0.00007845793,5.2565207e-7,0.00043693275,4.5220727e-7,0.0000086357595,0.018872995,0.9801163,0.00011507336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012923445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024546369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97975796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000074129726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002734904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.476712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948737149","doi":"","title":"The Empirical Gap in Jurisprudence: A Comprehensive Study of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Empirical research; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11382085104936428,"score_gpt":0.3538755267127173,"score_spread":0.24005467566335303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948737149","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3126065,0.15722208,1.7640822e-7,0.45420966,0.0004262762,0.0026227671,0.000031210388,0.000006232795,0.072875105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98830295,0.0075296657,5.520216e-7,0.004027307,0.000036552585,0.000009870586,1.5240316e-7,0.0000013567054,0.000091608985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986111,0.00039527562,0.00024552355,0.000082279126,0.00043516431,0.00023064538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928236,0.00018745488,0.00009077734,0.00019459748,0.00016031884,0.00008449863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055139937,0.00006570412,0.00021666524,0.000011410532,0.0009566629,0.0000090902495,0.0005379087,0.00001858771,0.000029319814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031060787,0.000031524643,0.000047696667,0.00041963355,0.00047771455,0.000018043722,0.00002583334,0.000121435034,0.0000018566211],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021694523,0.00018970642,0.06874525,0.00015682468,0.0001835706,0.00003609425,0.024697177,0.00004740856,0.0000056373824,0.5982839,0.2850465,0.022586282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009317533,0.000034483186,0.3102813,0.0004996586,0.000044085038,9.850888e-7,0.0052711247,0.0000010520988,7.9823917e-7,0.0035593894,0.6801395,0.000074467156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99065846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67569643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028899254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004119599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7357974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948979530","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3367097","title":"The SNC Lavalin Controversy: The Shawcross Principle and Prosecutorial Independence","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Philosophy; Political science; Psychology; Law and economics; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.007378854473775637,"score_gpt":0.2787928174836397,"score_spread":0.2714139630098641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948979530","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90711594,0.02024293,0.00022686752,0.02763827,0.0036769304,0.0008649153,0.0000055188666,0.00004908436,0.040179566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885643,0.007293034,0.0000019048757,0.0001425125,0.0013458062,0.0000072699745,1.7681143e-7,0.000003885636,0.0026411256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997818,0.00015826155,0.00014900007,0.00012366982,0.0005335116,0.0012175542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937063,0.00026370995,0.00010723616,0.00008230343,0.0001273311,0.000048785856],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003663935,0.000081561746,0.00010226415,0.000011505686,0.0031454428,0.00023886513,0.00033706526,0.00005858638,0.0000152327175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030320304,0.000043162432,0.000057833917,0.00010953476,0.00060046586,0.0001548852,0.00007297245,0.0009845216,0.000037403133],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053160602,0.0000074804025,0.008068403,3.6661618e-7,0.000057778918,5.1573215e-7,0.00097319816,0.0000023972818,0.000029850522,0.9872357,0.000077301,0.003493801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053859095,0.00010486345,0.0033868416,0.000008415677,0.000019665487,0.000028072076,0.013323263,0.000006971798,0.000008677145,0.5999911,0.38247895,0.0001045902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032340067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033633552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38724467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037162166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029903413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949892658","doi":"","title":"Reference re Senate Reform and the Supreme Court of Canada's Clarification of the Constitutional Procedure for Reforming the Canadian Parliament's Upper House","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and business review of the Americas","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Law; Political science; Supreme court; House of Representatives; Legislature; Politics","score_opus":0.023475867484959497,"score_gpt":0.2669595955756173,"score_spread":0.24348372809065782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949892658","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061960254,0.09141536,0.000105191524,0.6617356,0.00088032125,0.0052257045,0.00036575017,0.000026015214,0.1782858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878239,0.00890564,0.000021561758,0.0031271053,0.000042587526,0.000030873798,0.0000014770932,0.000002278018,0.000044595236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916375,0.00011491179,0.00022624966,0.00009165806,0.00027594637,0.00012749722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900705,0.00010329039,0.00029742607,0.00017197928,0.00039203328,0.000028208324],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007832125,0.000071456925,0.00022082092,0.000006371742,0.0012169195,0.000011249595,0.00027108667,0.00002784926,0.0000031983307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043411835,0.00002693029,0.000045247656,0.00023436378,0.004525638,0.000050610455,0.00005630768,0.00007059813,8.205459e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013598586,0.000005455413,0.00076619914,0.00032806364,0.000024363057,2.5360741e-8,0.0002502884,0.0000018540259,0.000013524594,0.996654,0.00045654722,0.0014861334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000400302,0.00001476906,0.03335654,0.003692774,0.00025509333,0.0000072615785,0.0022373155,0.00002182227,0.00015429621,0.01773825,0.9419564,0.00016517226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9236422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95306665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9789157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000880955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011173227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951270789","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avz015","title":"The Magnetism of Moral Reasoning and the Principle of Proportionality in Comparative Constitutional Adjudication","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Adjudication; Law; Constitutionality; Jurisprudence; Constitutional law; Politics; Constitution; Political science; Law and economics; Normative; Moral reasoning; Sociology","score_opus":0.039323926762791665,"score_gpt":0.3511782601717788,"score_spread":0.3118543334089871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951270789","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9742074,0.0012689347,0.0001322059,0.0031555218,0.00007437201,0.0002702164,0.0000061281753,0.000001727886,0.020883473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99953175,0.00017923074,0.00012064775,0.000079905374,0.000053892483,0.000005627468,4.475547e-7,8.4800826e-7,0.000027669897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822325,0.0006997982,0.00043902572,0.00006628845,0.00045920612,0.00011245196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99749506,0.0009597849,0.0010098652,0.00007962293,0.00042779298,0.000027885926],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017807744,0.00006820005,0.00038865063,0.00002170178,0.0004426782,0.000016039881,0.00024834808,0.000010504079,0.000014883361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048129757,0.000032235635,0.00006844892,0.00027069947,0.020225765,0.00011497425,0.00004714684,0.00016347805,0.0000019381328],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046496541,0.0000320987,0.02054494,0.0000012002797,0.00006359869,2.474864e-7,0.005650715,0.00023616427,0.000047384103,0.9728014,0.00002300518,0.00013429922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016576607,0.00043605454,0.562017,0.00016642748,0.00007406182,0.000018813478,0.034888394,0.00023235743,0.0002863504,0.38941652,0.010665566,0.00014077644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013925311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00084412267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5833849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004066718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034109596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9824406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951276840","doi":"10.82308/55286","title":"«Charter» compliance and the Canadian parliamentary process","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Parliament; Legislation; Legislature; Law; Humanities; Politics; Art","score_opus":0.037216967397224646,"score_gpt":0.2719312482249659,"score_spread":0.23471428082774126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951276840","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6426865,0.00050440064,3.297241e-7,0.00967806,0.0005239015,0.0005512416,0.00040302344,0.000104094965,0.34554845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99662745,0.00033620378,0.000026060356,0.0022541506,0.00008679649,0.00007372059,0.0000017976448,0.000011111224,0.0005827335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981925,0.00024226896,0.00021947015,0.00034495056,0.00045747985,0.0005433261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896467,0.0002673904,0.00008493508,0.00016099065,0.00018528996,0.00033673097],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009153627,0.00017184023,0.00021643323,0.000055286793,0.005966051,0.00007310784,0.00036535968,0.00009657336,0.0001871773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043934234,0.00010534587,0.000069147674,0.00024352435,0.0017652444,0.00047706647,0.00007623772,0.00019411303,0.00021429274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000356606,0.000015800146,0.0013221948,0.000005079522,0.00004597353,0.0000104924475,0.000053107015,2.6679615e-7,0.000108672924,0.91650534,0.000016848675,0.08188058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013843463,0.000030934105,0.0069427406,0.00017586119,0.000048011774,0.000008762597,0.0015407185,0.0000013359391,0.000409932,0.55957264,0.42947844,0.0004062614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39390713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84825534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4543482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046741313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014916567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99532807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952048328","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v9i2.8076","title":"A Wall Between the \"Public\" and the \"Private\": A Comment on Highwood Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses (Judicial Committee) v Wall","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Law; Political science; Supreme court; Judicial opinion; Charter; State (computer science); Prima facie; Judicial discretion; Accountability; Judicial activism; Politics","score_opus":0.045239658811208436,"score_gpt":0.3119905186116866,"score_spread":0.26675085980047814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952048328","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7482525,0.0038766302,0.000017584314,0.24413124,0.00048690455,0.00030150698,0.000005247399,0.000008875062,0.002919506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951087,0.0018491606,0.00001018243,0.002432621,0.0005122027,0.000006485259,4.8102083e-7,0.0000054128345,0.00007472835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796116,0.00041384122,0.00052147434,0.000115451316,0.00075896305,0.00022908606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99731684,0.0014077073,0.00059086486,0.00011239558,0.0005171765,0.000055035885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016885642,0.00015026928,0.0005490415,0.000059405214,0.0009065021,0.000099743316,0.00038779533,0.000045475623,0.000010062106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035354172,0.000075012635,0.00013546308,0.00019362672,0.0022386543,0.00025179193,0.00015848583,0.00026062055,0.000008521929],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004111884,0.00012441892,0.4048583,0.000028746268,0.0015240358,0.000008700599,0.021603879,0.000010849166,0.000012459773,0.56510997,0.0034793462,0.0028280795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005180896,0.0009822377,0.1987284,0.0005748112,0.0004994642,0.000018091137,0.028213644,0.000003146626,0.000113685855,0.04390755,0.7214294,0.0003486526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017671692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015373862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71795005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009119459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012706805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82484144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952268257","doi":"10.82308/29171","title":"Understanding judicial appointments reform: comparing Australia, Canada and the United States","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Nomination; Judicial reform; Political science; Appeal; Politics; Judicial activism; Judicial review; Judicial discretion; Judicial independence; Law; Power (physics); Judicial opinion; Public administration","score_opus":0.09584545262438166,"score_gpt":0.27157642207007837,"score_spread":0.17573096944569672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952268257","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88659114,0.000054357115,0.0000010239651,0.000911656,0.00041103028,0.0004388085,0.0000679265,0.00006637061,0.111457705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99839985,0.00020411795,0.000029574554,0.00077089237,0.000059790043,0.00004734243,0.000019326835,0.0000122436395,0.0004568354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997774,0.0003144847,0.0003422069,0.00030495223,0.0006789375,0.0005854354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990422,0.00026661344,0.00014558529,0.00014213799,0.00016771223,0.00023576134],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007902914,0.00021635307,0.00030315694,0.00008187441,0.005611045,0.00013525964,0.00030640682,0.00008884593,0.00014474762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026799354,0.00016251754,0.00006263885,0.00049097196,0.0010424936,0.000452627,0.00019415547,0.00036920936,0.000052473453],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035556448,0.000019311068,0.0010829326,0.0000058652886,0.00010882701,0.000006913816,0.00007024158,0.00003187582,0.000035787798,0.99755645,0.000045031196,0.0010012308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020777148,0.000045781722,0.008128585,0.00011268657,0.00011586835,0.0000070627334,0.018825928,0.00008437153,0.00024473396,0.85195774,0.11774366,0.0006558798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9890912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96389395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14559871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020574075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008926246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953156344","doi":"10.82308/51410","title":"Inviting judicial review: A comprehensive analysis of Canadian appellate court reference cases","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Newfoundland and Labrador","keywords":"Constitutionality; Supreme court; Political science; Politics; Law; Delegation; Judicial review; Delegate; Government (linguistics); Separation of powers; Standard of review; Legislation; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.06615853605251082,"score_gpt":0.29245090338279583,"score_spread":0.22629236733028502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953156344","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66471535,0.0037894994,4.9334363e-7,0.0020576168,0.00033040586,0.0004994265,0.002231688,0.000103022045,0.32627252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984417,0.013585189,0.000065015745,0.00160615,0.000054683394,0.00002238987,0.000016987758,0.000013530008,0.00021901287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99708325,0.0004271716,0.0006027232,0.00048764353,0.0007235457,0.00067568297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975082,0.00064825214,0.00033299744,0.0002723769,0.000790818,0.00044731697],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088320655,0.00025233842,0.0007142826,0.0007298862,0.002381856,0.000021409951,0.00042267473,0.00016215983,0.0004895552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019297118,0.00020742917,0.00028478118,0.0029221096,0.0007605861,0.00035831705,0.00012680996,0.00023268288,0.00015778128],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036757505,0.00006249209,0.0025686733,0.000062897096,0.0011914462,0.00012319573,0.000033566495,0.000009589509,0.0037988771,0.904335,0.00015861401,0.087618865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037339824,0.00007458683,0.010070873,0.0013378047,0.0014274628,0.000007780779,0.000687565,0.0000018165046,0.0011083642,0.020310728,0.9639312,0.00066841353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56027377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7844229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9637726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057823444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002486449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989169},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953263262","doi":"","title":"Gay rights in Canada and the US","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Docs.school Publications","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.03345103433157495,"score_gpt":0.2852426916050365,"score_spread":0.25179165727346153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953263262","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16106802,0.0008111016,0.000027856766,0.10770624,0.00028608102,0.00031031476,0.000015262807,0.00003498061,0.72974014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99800014,0.000043791762,0.000028316286,0.0007918929,0.00014593347,0.000075427204,0.0000035477005,0.0000010415988,0.00090989255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992858,0.00009631255,0.000112732,0.00010098412,0.0002489073,0.00015524222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994441,0.00012175551,0.000032708267,0.00009495863,0.0001529425,0.00015351508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041264688,0.00004392093,0.00007470737,0.000032286796,0.0005908676,0.00007359942,0.00016337741,0.000018814095,0.00007405433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065328693,0.000029435589,0.000012397351,0.0003768849,0.000412036,0.00017362485,0.000037369853,0.00008324672,0.000029537394],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002914116,0.0000066159964,0.060472988,1.7189782e-7,0.0000055656756,3.2227427e-7,0.0005590922,0.000004736214,1.2239894e-7,0.91167355,0.02713573,0.00013817278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028362233,0.0000013257281,0.1272979,0.0000020197263,0.0000045216975,5.265648e-7,0.0012779783,0.000009938917,4.096506e-7,0.09635519,0.7747162,0.000050345592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99689806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8369321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029776193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002628678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4663162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953433140","doi":"","title":"Language Rights Remedies in the Supreme Court of Canada: Invisible, Gentle, or Stern Hand?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Charter; Sociology","score_opus":0.019054061268048466,"score_gpt":0.2625804448931148,"score_spread":0.24352638362506632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953433140","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7215038,0.001231311,0.00003399294,0.0074061574,0.00064035645,0.00034135085,0.00003174815,0.000028485101,0.2687828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966762,0.000047450558,0.0000383287,0.001208318,0.00041946958,0.000015486992,0.0000028985075,0.0000032936146,0.0015885236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854827,0.00020183301,0.00021181934,0.00014853783,0.00059961475,0.00028993326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937385,0.00024566855,0.000070001006,0.00014636916,0.00008548195,0.000078607394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000722095,0.00009481362,0.00018977791,0.000025538293,0.00072117994,0.000044316304,0.00034510635,0.000050128096,0.00020068331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030698272,0.0000585095,0.000037537993,0.00022702923,0.0006187476,0.00010860973,0.00005069331,0.00013163526,0.000019698502],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006645124,0.00008523575,0.023491919,0.000022140332,0.00006058028,0.000043614422,0.013541132,0.000015629894,0.00016426425,0.92896193,0.03295858,0.00058850413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061837793,0.00006759493,0.04319463,0.00012104978,0.000030069785,0.0000020606951,0.011339047,0.000010460297,0.0005628821,0.025173016,0.91861236,0.00026846197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9473918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99822897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9037889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000092211376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046341182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5546806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953628719","doi":"10.21307/connections-2019-002","title":"Signed Networks for the US Supreme Court Overturning its Prior Decisions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Connections","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Citation; Supreme Court Decisions; Context (archaeology); Phenomenon; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04347248348762899,"score_gpt":0.3069129672295506,"score_spread":0.2634404837419216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953628719","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30756202,0.011888086,0.248513,0.07016275,0.02019338,0.006200718,0.00012847577,0.0007436885,0.33460787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99581254,0.00026478013,0.000065178785,0.0005292792,0.00065169926,0.00009434277,0.000002490601,0.000005032871,0.0025746736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992748,0.000046572295,0.00011865525,0.00014854028,0.00017159717,0.00023983516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997262,0.0023385696,0.000043975127,0.00009926524,0.00020237252,0.000053806547],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035582512,0.000068112815,0.00010172206,0.000025332123,0.0031781518,0.00006653562,0.00016592594,0.000059217375,0.00033147252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001108057,0.000049914153,0.00010244842,0.00024372766,0.00017303864,0.00010580315,0.00004147157,0.00009269224,0.00011555095],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028543564,0.000041335155,0.00415666,0.0000012180068,0.000105328945,4.66713e-7,0.001588029,0.004509042,0.000098818564,0.97014105,0.014047633,0.0052818856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000339148,0.00004639557,0.011310086,0.000031437383,0.00006744091,0.000001252487,0.0034400593,0.0042087035,0.000011142995,0.010007776,0.9703784,0.00015818418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010508263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054654153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96013325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006188841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015486055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953966777","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1357","title":"Reconciliation and the Constitution: A Transcript of the Roundtable","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; McGill University; University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Constitution; Indigenous; Human rights; Amnesty; Political science; Law; Politics; Supreme court; State (computer science); Indigenous rights; Refugee; Sociology","score_opus":0.07135062782059755,"score_gpt":0.32737763228149425,"score_spread":0.2560270044608967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953966777","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012340373,0.2091555,0.0000910975,0.14463845,0.0008730773,0.0010605572,0.000015962069,0.000017170063,0.6429141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9223776,0.07517231,0.000011748329,0.0015593484,0.000107610605,0.000026930891,3.9034003e-7,0.0000011198463,0.0007429782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922794,0.00016325199,0.000170786,0.00009098156,0.00024227981,0.00010476575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993837,0.00007579636,0.00014909878,0.00022114457,0.00014721617,0.000023082184],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012122999,0.00005595636,0.00019800788,0.0000027233023,0.0028029203,0.00008594865,0.00029865064,0.000025529058,0.000050697403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005035242,0.00002893598,0.00009301794,0.000048488804,0.003407106,0.00030208024,0.00004468953,0.000063368476,0.000005545887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044655235,0.00000469365,0.0005638366,0.00006357707,0.000016395345,1.2258872e-7,0.00022102312,9.7886804e-8,0.0000035036853,0.9968228,0.00093939493,0.0013601215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024097615,0.0000035184469,0.0009173902,0.00086856016,0.00009690831,0.0000012212552,0.00008722326,7.926453e-7,0.000009351246,0.037797213,0.95992994,0.00004688336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019653479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019737842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95902556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036590565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017642867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99930507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954057586","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1359","title":"Land Acknowledgment, Scripting and Julius Caesar","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Canadian Mennonite University; University of Manitoba; Harvard University","keywords":"Honour; Oppression; Constitution; Presentation (obstetrics); Supreme court; Political science; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.039322145840312135,"score_gpt":0.31222321921292673,"score_spread":0.2729010733726146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954057586","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008729127,0.3740868,0.000006366402,0.0061537186,0.00059301255,0.0005731067,0.000007591413,0.000059151844,0.6097911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78039145,0.21277462,0.000088621724,0.004347985,0.00041274418,0.000023768052,0.0000046014716,0.000007993752,0.0019482247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991419,0.00008289271,0.0001557021,0.00017413362,0.00023138552,0.00021402433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996201,0.000050508326,0.0000495899,0.000093662944,0.000111756264,0.000074378026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055780844,0.000086268185,0.00023925774,0.0000095216155,0.00045661465,0.00003582362,0.000114064875,0.0000329556,0.0005060551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000112241614,0.0000714534,0.00005218812,0.00011869479,0.00028078607,0.0001329658,0.00006878762,0.00007453214,0.00066413527],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029179512,0.000023200164,0.024290148,0.000521269,0.000041432842,0.0000034240816,0.00041129286,1.6363293e-7,0.000023327666,0.9551632,0.01138145,0.008138178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008903233,0.000011356728,0.0005292005,0.0014596327,0.000036628444,0.0000011029792,0.000078231256,7.451784e-7,0.0000024580338,0.0032359613,0.9944517,0.00010394929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037061435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004926474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98307025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003767118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007716815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8536337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954913440","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3492658","title":"Introduction: The 'What' and 'Why' of Constitutional Dialogue","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; McGill University; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; Kelowna General Hospital; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.009084466870500539,"score_gpt":0.245378384108145,"score_spread":0.23629391723764445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954913440","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57640225,0.09138967,0.0035089143,0.24715267,0.006465362,0.0007056824,0.000008836551,0.000056244146,0.07431034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9740086,0.023655025,0.0000079183865,0.0001861404,0.0015989072,0.000001907902,7.7777446e-7,0.000001523113,0.00053918024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987955,0.00009470574,0.00013822562,0.000094383046,0.00028162677,0.0005955753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962217,0.00008193669,0.000087251676,0.00005152687,0.00012518522,0.000031922715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014370882,0.000056861736,0.000103550185,0.00002892819,0.00074602925,0.000053050117,0.00013052514,0.000034506036,0.00011108907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000107814056,0.00003841748,0.00004895225,0.00015321713,0.0016981713,0.00028855223,0.000027272268,0.00044918316,0.000027117914],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014031713,0.000011941098,0.0030714516,7.253406e-7,0.00005959921,2.1153156e-7,0.0004085409,0.000007774469,0.000031829775,0.9906419,0.00034547306,0.005406547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023495386,0.00007679853,0.0012388217,0.000013746187,0.00002533109,0.00008874535,0.021299478,0.0000014125376,0.000012660345,0.7509846,0.22594494,0.0000784964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005490331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025685353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39760634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018901826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020351282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62569827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955814727","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1351","title":"Keeping the Scale of Justice Balanced – Québec Justices of the Peace and Judicial Independence","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Safeguarding; Judicial independence; Misconduct; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Legislature; Independence (probability theory); Constitution; Separation of powers; Government (linguistics); Balance (ability); Administration (probate law); Judicial activism; Judicial review; Supreme court; Psychology","score_opus":0.04058203566118073,"score_gpt":0.32967354935368126,"score_spread":0.2890915136925005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955814727","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053556032,0.453598,0.00007192483,0.07371212,0.0015616061,0.0015479161,0.000043659384,0.000034958546,0.4158738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9405506,0.058336418,0.000021809476,0.0008309091,0.00017471373,0.000010195976,1.6006521e-7,0.0000025836614,0.00007255495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988451,0.00015200551,0.00024076822,0.00013492002,0.000470842,0.0001563408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885654,0.00021152054,0.0003620172,0.00029646535,0.00023904101,0.000034438384],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010650997,0.00008047175,0.0002782384,0.0000050517383,0.002238045,0.000031353928,0.000672654,0.000038649905,0.000043044456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011456147,0.000046570225,0.00008465599,0.000078492485,0.0029380887,0.0001485534,0.00023299525,0.00011888681,0.0000043177297],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016568822,0.000047945377,0.018589422,0.0016771915,0.00008079577,0.0000012390016,0.0031017296,0.0000026712557,0.0001828771,0.9605842,0.0020580587,0.013657251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043833055,0.00005607126,0.12928775,0.013398901,0.0020885346,0.0000055846476,0.0038481145,0.000015574915,0.00026651507,0.013517717,0.8366515,0.0004254256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13953595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2150383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94706655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002362659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034302784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2957568653","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0022","title":"Unity in the eye of the beholder? Reasons for decision in theory and practice in the Ontario Works program","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Corporate governance; Front line; Public relations; Scale (ratio); Judicial opinion; Political science; Sociology; Law; Management; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.019062088792294,"score_gpt":0.2965428445027758,"score_spread":0.2774807557104818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2957568653","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85845727,0.00081040006,0.000038776092,0.0030804502,0.000099365316,0.0004849367,0.0000024217984,0.000001600222,0.13702479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992801,0.00030621586,0.00023810967,0.000094205556,0.000017718503,3.0542034e-7,1.260099e-7,6.320963e-7,0.000062601124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989377,0.00059322116,0.00008314274,0.000055255176,0.00022913421,0.00010153738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99823165,0.0015164546,0.000102384016,0.000064365406,0.00007088372,0.000014284166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030010417,0.000036861315,0.000084999854,0.000010226688,0.00049457006,0.000022230248,0.00032510163,0.00004069405,0.000036043562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037733436,0.000021410724,0.000044399218,0.0000670641,0.00042270895,0.0003228552,0.00004828111,0.00017867333,1.8126413e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006231258,0.00032442858,0.09098553,0.0000027335045,0.000022436025,0.000007168856,0.1664105,0.000028735689,0.0000025619656,0.71979964,0.00013043702,0.021662727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006259091,0.00009238955,0.52988285,0.0001754975,0.00003037713,0.0000047488265,0.33888054,0.0000022248314,3.7584948e-7,0.025121976,0.10513325,0.000049849565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6078769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9855979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69467765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019708206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015154414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39473426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2958512376","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198841395.003.0003","title":"Emergence and Diffusion","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Political science; Politics; Charter; Democracy; Law; European union; Human rights; Convention; Constitutional law; Normative; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; International trade","score_opus":0.02982851269237283,"score_gpt":0.22734237684104505,"score_spread":0.19751386414867222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2958512376","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021185188,0.0002701119,0.000029307455,0.0000798423,0.00026248954,0.0001937341,0.000032836728,0.000045803255,0.998874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006230011,0.004001383,0.000021227594,0.000039539314,0.00012250898,1.4474841e-7,0.0000032313571,0.000005871751,0.9895761],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993037,0.000017782357,0.00006565502,0.00022166943,0.00023901684,0.00015216247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996437,0.000038328617,0.00007446438,0.00009418487,0.00007195675,0.00007740883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006251449,0.00012671362,0.00016963453,0.00004423078,0.0007038553,0.00001838791,0.00018352696,0.0001794743,0.00010779782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000070934902,0.00013835619,0.00006693771,0.000004535614,0.0006298152,0.000054610537,0.0002593234,0.00014291098,0.0000031220977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015758022,0.00000234613,0.000041806386,0.000006778371,0.000031883243,0.000012247012,0.0005946081,1.214657e-7,0.000002472109,0.99274826,0.0013757347,0.0051680086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000098464356,0.0000141197515,0.000045298177,0.000054732143,0.000054070173,3.288906e-7,0.00037616023,0.0000014490995,9.0865035e-7,0.007531866,0.99165523,0.00016735269],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018826579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010586528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9902795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043188975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013700101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56420016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2959601507","doi":"10.12728/culj.12.4","title":"Docket Control in the Apex Court Exercising Constitutional Review","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Christ University Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Jurisprudence; Constitutional court; Law; Political science; Legislature; Arrears; Abandonment (legal); Economics; Constitution; Debt","score_opus":0.023600890525098027,"score_gpt":0.2763493385152141,"score_spread":0.2527484479901161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2959601507","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003788436,0.0073596393,0.0026928298,0.031574063,0.0006968114,0.0002835315,0.000026659538,0.0000259432,0.95355207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99051094,0.0056604664,0.0000414393,0.0030325286,0.00067394663,2.1228672e-7,0.0000010521186,9.946122e-7,0.00007844485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989073,0.0002709126,0.000123135,0.000094877374,0.0003885928,0.00021515085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941796,0.0001246503,0.00008302552,0.000057556274,0.000243388,0.000073395604],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010975079,0.0000675563,0.0001456525,0.000034224086,0.0039489525,0.000057590725,0.00032969416,0.000038970004,0.00033056003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000100827594,0.00005284027,0.00008114002,0.00024751032,0.004345397,0.00024225122,0.00002705861,0.00022076306,0.00006619169],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026237503,0.000037263504,0.0010141658,0.000004821229,0.00001912316,0.00010758338,0.00095398055,0.0000013207969,0.0000031144702,0.9760936,0.021164665,0.0005741427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044250113,0.00001962933,0.0013510395,0.00034183994,0.000048697326,0.00004193793,0.004503314,0.0000029242105,0.0000010090798,0.0064679333,0.98669124,0.00008791024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043639475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013403908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98672247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019317765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003256067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2961110486","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1343","title":"Constitutional Constraints on Electoral Reform in Canada:Why Parliament is (Mostly) Free to Implement a New Voting System","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Charter; Constitution; Political science; Voting; Electoral system; Constitutional amendment; Government (linguistics); Law; Electoral reform; Public administration; Democracy; Law and economics; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.0490881735934815,"score_gpt":0.3052383308283495,"score_spread":0.256150157234868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2961110486","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047655124,0.033072934,0.0016235186,0.4470877,0.0027218275,0.0057404274,0.0010980628,0.00022482447,0.50366515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860629,0.0011809433,0.00008689975,0.0122956205,0.00022575133,0.000076743694,0.0000036698455,0.00000459134,0.00006288955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975782,0.00012298535,0.0005239725,0.00033772245,0.00087646546,0.0005606299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991337,0.000102824415,0.000116595256,0.00019198988,0.00016373234,0.0002911693],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075286144,0.00018915524,0.00042730104,0.00002375933,0.00046889097,0.000024511006,0.00035359853,0.00003696782,0.00091761147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017700555,0.00013179987,0.00008950095,0.00025940704,0.0005703818,0.00009812352,0.00010451701,0.00008898134,0.00008817905],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007896893,0.00001295356,0.0016783172,0.000082708415,0.000030302033,0.000014407141,0.000052574687,3.3370458e-7,0.000005605433,0.9637797,0.026026176,0.008309017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041084673,0.00003973073,0.00059656746,0.0059419055,0.000033700242,0.0000042596266,0.00033956236,3.822992e-7,0.000033596472,0.0012767257,0.99106216,0.00026058542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92005384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9839014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9812974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055775517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043053906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2961112438","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0012","title":"Amending the Constitution of Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Constitutional amendment; Political science; Law; Politics; Constitutional law; Constitutional economics; Ratification","score_opus":0.04041237117811698,"score_gpt":0.23210714202846913,"score_spread":0.19169477085035214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2961112438","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000021652964,0.00011215909,0.000025332825,0.00018860586,0.00036857207,0.00017022263,0.000092764676,0.000014697782,0.999006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07396593,0.000404944,0.000008375531,0.000028406024,0.00013976566,2.5949242e-7,0.0000028163377,0.0000028124225,0.9254467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927324,0.00002254012,0.000083366846,0.0001305577,0.00033523492,0.00015508791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935824,0.00007173351,0.00022802885,0.0001621868,0.00012724585,0.000052556563],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012524413,0.00010519799,0.00017370711,0.000024036628,0.0022967167,0.000020784095,0.0004248566,0.00010473902,0.000025686484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002857179,0.00009369941,0.00007594427,0.0000023729456,0.0020135574,0.000046459863,0.00015243124,0.0001516559,1.6067133e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012574096,0.0000011552054,0.000008850159,0.000004581863,0.00007455148,0.000019178657,0.00031256632,0.0000017033942,6.905278e-7,0.9954804,0.0027262433,0.0013575128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000072601215,0.000005010187,0.00001528505,0.000076102864,0.00007459451,4.4150195e-7,0.00038720176,5.7299917e-7,0.0000054949414,0.0069657015,0.99229217,0.00010483237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6315595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75856644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9895659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027302527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016904775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99900216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963003061","doi":"","title":"THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA AND THE PROVINCIAL COURT IN CANADA","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Original jurisdiction; Court of equity; Court of record; Majority opinion; Political science; Constitutionality; Certiorari; Concurring opinion; Jurisdiction; Law of the case; Remand (court procedure); Precedent; Constitution; Constitutional court","score_opus":0.014306860440836372,"score_gpt":0.22803156217914847,"score_spread":0.2137247017383121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963003061","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023151228,0.19055933,6.783476e-8,0.5939627,0.00029281544,0.0013190662,0.00009529954,0.0000037380473,0.1906157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9375438,0.054947995,5.339822e-7,0.006653923,0.00009191233,0.000027503673,7.3795593e-7,0.00000254531,0.00073103927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885005,0.00024801318,0.00019078022,0.000077946665,0.00033828337,0.000294919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994065,0.00024014665,0.000044975543,0.00012130942,0.0000611665,0.00012587279],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011278744,0.00006750355,0.00018335486,0.00000548286,0.0015092591,0.000018526005,0.00033070575,0.000013995501,0.00023211035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002587784,0.000032453085,0.000024256145,0.0001711221,0.00082725805,0.000021501328,0.000013546637,0.00010677636,0.0000026241933],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021930655,0.000003431163,0.0062092496,0.000079731915,0.000062175626,0.000024587627,0.0014182758,0.000009282269,7.508621e-8,0.65970486,0.25487268,0.077593684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007872338,0.0000017277529,0.009042428,0.00016034178,0.000019645167,0.000001417329,0.00040226043,0.0000027752053,1.1119033e-7,0.0017227931,0.98851585,0.000051940897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99999887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9143926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009384494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03013687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963567466","doi":"10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1066","title":"Equality in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oñati Socio-legal Series","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Jurisprudence; Sociology; Humanities; Gender equality; Gender studies; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.016721215287915966,"score_gpt":0.26389952975075237,"score_spread":0.2471783144628364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963567466","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.642919,0.00023518459,0.0000016196952,0.007673082,0.00055265025,0.00013034392,0.000014096458,0.000023166276,0.34845087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953401,0.00011213815,0.000028773853,0.0005294963,0.00013428487,0.000011257268,0.0000032379849,0.000003151343,0.003837557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895805,0.000103519626,0.00014735053,0.00014173155,0.0003649996,0.00028437286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967855,0.00010121749,0.00004165039,0.000068658504,0.00005288834,0.00005703039],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002196156,0.000076923454,0.00015894268,0.0000137941315,0.00039742267,0.000033403638,0.00013669257,0.00004159117,0.0005703388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011836216,0.000074218195,0.00003197152,0.00017483128,0.00026913456,0.0002931261,0.000045602323,0.00009861618,0.00008781179],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010905408,0.0000096244985,0.30432975,0.0000063933508,0.000010025533,0.0000046020077,0.0033275068,0.0000050351846,0.000016362435,0.6900161,0.0018214409,0.0004422851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001873189,0.000017789083,0.15081725,0.00002533205,0.0000047425488,4.1077072e-7,0.04529458,9.75676e-7,0.00003798923,0.020167513,0.78322464,0.0002214533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99604964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99891615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7814032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008256274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033422222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.624481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963996696","doi":"10.1093/icon/moz057","title":"Is the Commonwealth’s approach to rights constitutionalism exportable?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Constitutionalism; Normative; Jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.031378958354921875,"score_gpt":0.31864168189163056,"score_spread":0.2872627235367087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963996696","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0115823,0.0005710102,0.0045705973,0.03180268,0.0055795163,0.0003982601,0.000114324925,0.000027251897,0.94535404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98732245,0.00006165813,0.00092205836,0.00946459,0.0015025091,0.000011824666,0.000010286068,0.0000036269614,0.00070101593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99679023,0.00013695656,0.00063169154,0.00020508002,0.0019425218,0.00029351292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971246,0.0003509905,0.0003519309,0.00014106113,0.0018150999,0.00021628612],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011138034,0.00016360388,0.00027587594,0.00014928615,0.0009997272,0.0001704439,0.0010459836,0.00009032756,0.0007186926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016910104,0.000115395545,0.000251946,0.00024634963,0.0035839411,0.00052579306,0.00011459807,0.0003025889,0.00038726142],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083003906,0.00012975601,0.0023698104,0.0000016619206,0.00024598528,0.000017158221,0.0008284146,0.00040250385,0.00002643321,0.9835701,0.012220463,0.00010473943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047370905,0.00002747219,0.0009486681,0.00007088343,0.000027421182,0.00014296296,0.0005368961,0.0000078272915,0.000049975533,0.11344756,0.8841184,0.0001482488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028607494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003933592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97574013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032611768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015075221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99912775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964917791","doi":"","title":"Complementarity: The Constitutional Role of the Senate of Canada","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complementarity (molecular biology); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.013618278548489715,"score_gpt":0.2266752809809839,"score_spread":0.2130570024324942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964917791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33532053,0.022256186,0.00079365494,0.06770664,0.007478121,0.0016901878,0.0021845459,0.000024435245,0.5625457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99506485,0.00021764936,0.000085041596,0.0006428024,0.00033314808,0.00001882346,0.000017164733,0.0000035902137,0.003616925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977346,0.00021365345,0.0005546743,0.00022586352,0.00091620936,0.0003549849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99793303,0.0005464846,0.00042921506,0.00022037028,0.00079484563,0.00007603639],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000784541,0.00015680745,0.00030080555,0.00004332998,0.0010868433,0.000016765765,0.0005321466,0.00010796246,0.00067247485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004592576,0.00013092224,0.00020035902,0.0006641949,0.007829288,0.00015467597,0.00014303783,0.0002626536,0.000021556321],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010950341,0.00008976754,0.030652784,0.000054697684,0.00017270967,0.0000012221055,0.0005956607,0.0027725415,0.00026994816,0.9638319,0.0011964511,0.00035135128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008122998,0.00002221166,0.036490135,0.0007519056,0.00021785357,0.000076465,0.005992257,0.001161657,0.0009248072,0.3606402,0.59256727,0.00034294277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34735453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4438328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6597443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010976138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010449174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99516064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965004679","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1334","title":"The Pragmatic Limits of Access to Justice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Computer science; Internet privacy; Law","score_opus":0.09009961212703126,"score_gpt":0.37789147344065155,"score_spread":0.2877918613136203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965004679","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00066511595,0.17104591,0.00041156737,0.25272012,0.0009536975,0.0014953794,0.000023583156,0.00006345244,0.57262117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69908607,0.2918453,0.00007758471,0.0074924235,0.00038398395,0.00011791831,5.492319e-7,0.000006788125,0.0009893962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989456,0.00015351598,0.00023109652,0.00010843477,0.00036504987,0.00019628833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891055,0.0005261038,0.00008511447,0.00014804043,0.00025870817,0.000071513634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009583752,0.00006587888,0.00019126595,0.0000071828695,0.0007034309,0.000029063933,0.0004541233,0.000019826439,0.00012608364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014530321,0.0000319775,0.00006698938,0.00021722252,0.00049842766,0.0001508111,0.00008421778,0.000029771121,0.00018719722],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002495627,0.000010520101,0.000091303875,0.00017844238,0.000017132614,4.656253e-7,0.00009587228,7.4117146e-8,0.00001877691,0.95904785,0.019488946,0.021048129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038398117,0.000011370169,0.00029277825,0.0023961125,0.00009137548,2.79273e-7,0.00005175607,4.248217e-8,0.000018567205,0.012906744,0.9841318,0.000060752725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010724642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005749742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9646429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036929716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013777468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5410293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965375933","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0046","title":"The Politics of Constitutional Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Politics; Political science; Law; Democracy; Jurisprudence; Ideology; Constitution; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.043375877205431804,"score_gpt":0.25232024629130895,"score_spread":0.20894436908587716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965375933","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000040170708,0.000292499,0.0000337205,0.00019294604,0.0003256825,0.00015509993,0.00018029589,0.000024218,0.9987915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016991787,0.00094915536,0.000017491357,0.000035999354,0.00024579366,2.8902056e-7,0.000004464544,0.0000034940438,0.9817515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991843,0.000024627305,0.00010561157,0.0001395435,0.00035470317,0.00019118082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912757,0.00014929411,0.00021051208,0.00019791596,0.00024248667,0.00007220566],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013717184,0.00011853856,0.00018147282,0.000021989941,0.0046532387,0.000040955107,0.0005333874,0.00017204108,0.00001605436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029102066,0.000105647414,0.00014318479,0.0000017612891,0.014123494,0.00005427963,0.00021740618,0.00016873101,0.0000011559596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013900335,0.0000029785845,0.0000044428957,0.0000039807187,0.00010153201,0.000012534594,0.00020334437,3.7722972e-7,2.6819203e-7,0.99790895,0.001108898,0.00063878094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009162468,0.000008327694,0.0000038145256,0.000050899416,0.00006978451,5.5726866e-7,0.00013864368,1.8230308e-7,0.0000033742049,0.13598536,0.86354584,0.00010158536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003970973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029086303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86243695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001135984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005626136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966424497","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0005","title":"The British Legal Tradition in Canadian Constitutional Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Preamble; Constitution; Assertion; Law; Section (typography); Political science; State (computer science); Jurisprudence; Engineering","score_opus":0.03087835502405944,"score_gpt":0.22495928893047948,"score_spread":0.19408093390642003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966424497","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000020490823,0.00021258605,0.000005307991,0.00041612657,0.00041741683,0.0002344365,0.00027567975,0.000024774345,0.9983932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12014147,0.00085644296,0.000005158655,0.00010052017,0.0002767225,0.0000012246611,0.00002212217,0.0000045618344,0.8785918],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990603,0.000032887343,0.00009917251,0.00020502944,0.00028248748,0.0003201573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943227,0.0000630352,0.00009341252,0.00012774306,0.00010242165,0.000181104],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019895617,0.00012080454,0.00015681887,0.0000397383,0.008786319,0.00041185835,0.00044830577,0.00021815066,0.00002390506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002253772,0.0001416263,0.00009965426,0.0000037188277,0.0061227754,0.00015273702,0.000064042644,0.00028297887,0.0000020764583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010400971,0.0000022503414,0.000013900114,0.0000016374981,0.000034249082,0.00025075578,0.00011421158,8.770092e-7,4.297728e-8,0.9953556,0.001963559,0.0022524842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014222578,0.0000059336385,0.000065014625,0.0000958819,0.000027069616,0.000004832827,0.00014840954,7.2436393e-7,1.6959333e-7,0.04322761,0.9561195,0.00016262663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92729527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9919826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9541559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006332707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020045978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966769105","doi":"10.60770/z1qm-3c78","title":"A historical analysis of the substantive principles of fundamental justice under Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Mount Royal University Institutional Repository (Mount Royal University)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Political science; Law; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.01392457169266955,"score_gpt":0.2065943635396434,"score_spread":0.19266979184697383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966769105","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86105496,0.00029135906,0.000014629755,0.000085528285,0.0016304835,0.00025052085,0.00024574366,0.000010671675,0.13641612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97684747,0.000027263166,0.000008965105,0.0000051307866,0.00008568985,2.5757745e-7,0.000030444047,0.000003919037,0.022990847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981269,0.00019217614,0.0003262075,0.00032808052,0.0008275929,0.00019900798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837065,0.00010047469,0.0005452746,0.0001865037,0.0006883466,0.000108730244],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017631197,0.00020408187,0.0004767507,0.00065693323,0.0021119136,0.000016334026,0.0004961792,0.00030899962,0.0000311642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039387294,0.00017163262,0.00048713948,0.0013885961,0.002076707,0.00011226762,0.0001318062,0.00031451997,5.966388e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028590634,0.00014570267,0.013567154,0.00014457798,0.00195306,0.00004073414,0.0057729282,0.005058046,0.0003169135,0.9725537,0.00015013802,0.000011157127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009110746,0.00016063226,0.69641536,0.000929202,0.017357685,0.000004238265,0.03932983,0.000543062,0.00085042,0.00096908375,0.2418178,0.0007116191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7647181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80524933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9715846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056757997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026809152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2968113158","doi":"10.3968/11058","title":"Comparison of Two Approaches to Methodology of Legal Theory","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Positivism; Legal positivism; Epistemology; Criticism; Descriptive research; Sociology; Legal research; Law; Philosophy; Legal realism; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.3123650236014809,"score_gpt":0.409534434116056,"score_spread":0.09716941051457512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2968113158","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3009309,0.000084618616,0.0002337459,0.001269568,0.0003644332,0.00017292022,0.000013274804,0.000006955325,0.6969236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988972,0.0000012055281,0.0005535046,0.00020301335,0.000110788176,0.0000037520756,3.3250342e-7,0.0000017066008,0.00022850094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877733,0.00018409014,0.00015622779,0.0001706361,0.00036292739,0.0003488171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935526,0.00016398364,0.000073514944,0.000066506975,0.00013027136,0.00021047564],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021015152,0.000052580504,0.00022181532,0.00013565809,0.000645297,0.00001572992,0.00043642166,0.000040016177,0.000107967375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041433424,0.000051903673,0.000045872086,0.00093753624,0.0029643367,0.00011499505,0.000048488055,0.000061092,0.000024838018],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040543478,0.0000076234155,0.04405406,0.0000016601721,0.000004724532,2.082587e-7,0.011388359,0.000004092148,0.0004944919,0.93836856,0.00008863645,0.0055835526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058904174,0.00026372692,0.13079903,0.000057557758,0.00006919907,9.711349e-7,0.31794912,0.000031750627,0.0066490537,0.30441356,0.23836678,0.0008102365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2337839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24365184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6979663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020571964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018633661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W296842398","doi":"","title":"Constitutionalism, Judicial Review, and Progressive Change: A Rejoinder to McClain and Fleming","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Law; Judicial review; Political science; Warren Court; Scrutiny; Social rights; Economic Justice; Constitutional law; Constitutional theory; Sociology; Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.059933132087847646,"score_gpt":0.3676803833157433,"score_spread":0.3077472512278957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W296842398","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00043856676,0.8505655,0.000007271694,0.06749995,0.00008027806,0.0013706103,0.000016067213,0.00005024472,0.079971515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14130272,0.7377795,0.00062575395,0.118433975,0.0013069651,0.00030104266,0.000007834579,0.000008898103,0.00023330172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876505,0.00012566912,0.00027110637,0.00027097407,0.0003020148,0.0002651979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941385,0.00007285223,0.00009146232,0.00009013371,0.00015719004,0.0001745298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008716972,0.00013623842,0.00039896343,0.000020875721,0.00074489054,0.00003722364,0.00010516082,0.00004746542,0.0002733034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038001614,0.000114102375,0.000048451835,0.00025095907,0.0011378531,0.00022213745,0.00011036106,0.000099019664,0.00010688641],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021369437,0.000015379715,0.0005783305,0.0006117042,0.000020858075,0.000005633605,0.00021423829,2.7676757e-8,5.743582e-7,0.962954,0.0065868166,0.029010337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008572702,0.000015203888,0.0009650296,0.0071412353,0.00013936513,0.000014674288,0.000019563364,1.2984437e-7,0.0000012466897,0.0024845079,0.9889695,0.00016383461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015524742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015415833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98238266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006293795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011551434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5729171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2968498775","doi":"10.4324/9781315565408-19","title":"The Right to Self-Government and Protecting the Vulnerable: Balancing Rights under Canadian Constitutional Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitutional law; Government (linguistics); Political science; Self-incrimination; Constitutional right; Constitution","score_opus":0.010106074337473745,"score_gpt":0.23810770598037126,"score_spread":0.22800163164289752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2968498775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01115786,0.00015465294,0.0010097292,0.095994405,0.00042292065,0.00048606153,0.00001686647,0.000046638765,0.8907109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99614185,0.000021348855,0.00006288116,0.0017647011,0.00025139426,0.000030328087,7.3943724e-8,0.0000012211672,0.0017262211],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988985,0.0002033447,0.00009492121,0.00013137845,0.00037492157,0.000296913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890167,0.000805002,0.000022853548,0.00006400407,0.00006093472,0.00014555879],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012368052,0.00006665096,0.00005818332,0.00000724407,0.016131677,0.00010251555,0.00013074154,0.000029472056,0.00010382106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002099889,0.000025855483,0.000018189794,0.00009666101,0.0012972176,0.00008610658,0.000040541174,0.000114094066,0.000039285478],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020246227,0.0000029051587,0.00038936903,2.3383433e-7,0.00002107934,0.0000012177834,0.00058118725,0.0000015057551,0.00002559182,0.99726605,0.0011751322,0.0005337042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000085297695,0.000008022369,0.0009851187,0.000018489274,0.000007721432,0.000002533603,0.0020795753,0.0000017467116,0.00015326253,0.09932708,0.89724636,0.00008480557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41257313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.940146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.984984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038607692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038957654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9851492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969292910","doi":"10.5509/2019923419","title":"Japan’s Agenda Setting to Lower the Voting Age from 20 to 18","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific Affairs","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democratic legitimacy; Legitimacy; Voting; Democracy; Political science; Political economy; Public administration; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.024401926106838185,"score_gpt":0.27368633255107633,"score_spread":0.24928440644423813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969292910","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07285084,0.0001322113,0.00015509536,0.007502354,0.0013571724,0.00038497665,0.0000320786,0.0000826505,0.91750264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99462783,0.0000066587972,0.00022426878,0.00034326682,0.00066017115,0.000021239555,0.0000035251976,0.0000071393792,0.0041058706],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873334,0.00008021544,0.00014914038,0.00027123597,0.00039500097,0.00037108304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940825,0.0002366604,0.000042904765,0.00014084394,0.000057685498,0.00011367896],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004496228,0.000107006104,0.0001431352,0.000030291963,0.00091167376,0.00010166195,0.0002800512,0.00004539415,0.0007979776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002483114,0.00008027528,0.00007328177,0.00031052183,0.00016408111,0.00007828312,0.00013834692,0.00010769402,0.003022823],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013592798,0.00016205119,0.08059555,0.000013475706,0.00029565117,0.000065627675,0.38358426,0.000569926,0.0043609533,0.2619789,0.23389588,0.0343418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010112188,0.000034648765,0.005625244,0.000058198737,0.00001626433,2.6892366e-7,0.5333355,0.0000108248605,0.00004659536,0.0023345235,0.45817816,0.00025865578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004129887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057084234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.921777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009060714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007908306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99775344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969457853","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199485079.003.0018","title":"Appointments to the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Commission; Economic Justice; Prime minister; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.02971664640538418,"score_gpt":0.22069211093571797,"score_spread":0.1909754645303338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969457853","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011744541,0.000037896894,0.000027583339,0.0004927692,0.00032428073,0.00029238962,0.00016629996,0.0000151220265,0.9985262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008700908,0.000091135415,0.000025560406,0.0001657342,0.00022802726,5.184089e-7,0.0000032934215,0.000005615667,0.9907792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906,0.000025797179,0.00009350682,0.00016471391,0.00046357463,0.00019240969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993934,0.00004903267,0.000100684825,0.00015012722,0.00021005048,0.00009670917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012099811,0.00011964208,0.00017799545,0.00002950852,0.00080847007,0.000010728656,0.00045387622,0.0000905449,0.00012681389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015721924,0.00010517535,0.00006937857,0.000008656032,0.00061039045,0.000023245559,0.0002407759,0.00009994231,0.0000014631015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028006083,0.0000025801241,0.000005951275,0.0000035915264,0.000102986494,0.000009280559,0.001133988,0.0000011584226,4.1956253e-7,0.9354731,0.06259066,0.00064831553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070067246,0.000021257154,0.00001976924,0.000045626457,0.000058816324,1.8171016e-7,0.0006417847,3.8071835e-7,0.000007279827,0.0031737064,0.99584466,0.000116493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.495978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8300602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.933254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002786765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010131991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62181795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970537003","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v12n3p156","title":"Burden and Standard of Proof in Election Petitions without Criminal Allegations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Allegation; Law; Declaration; Extant taxon; Reasonable doubt; Presumption; Political science; Economic Justice; Burden of proof; Election law; Law and economics; Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.017910543186816605,"score_gpt":0.30571694179740555,"score_spread":0.28780639861058893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970537003","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93080807,0.00045055666,0.00004894241,0.0034255486,0.00009847492,0.00006675314,0.000009009127,0.0000014635235,0.065091185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993302,0.00021081974,0.00012346612,0.000046188346,0.00016295316,4.718442e-7,1.8591258e-7,0.0000010747768,0.00012463311],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995718,0.000026587966,0.00014267843,0.000032402393,0.00014760994,0.00007893776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996707,0.000038324575,0.00007522512,0.000015100546,0.0001602739,0.00004039221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019950679,0.000027668604,0.00010375596,0.000041444946,0.00015055695,0.000016537238,0.000023455192,0.00002121853,0.000019768158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041841962,0.000023330285,0.000018359722,0.000047845093,0.0002730368,0.000092991824,0.0000086980635,0.00006184682,2.9500953e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010545485,0.000009942112,0.0054806047,0.0000072483895,0.000010870711,8.2232043e-7,0.0021542944,0.0000051679176,0.00006686422,0.99208385,0.00002063523,0.00014916922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001547775,0.0010544729,0.05759593,0.00040292548,0.00019150655,0.00005488301,0.0363959,0.00004015411,0.00044559597,0.7096927,0.19235279,0.00022531995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040192017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005042172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2823911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026952186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013579214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6075857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971392639","doi":"","title":"Why Fundamental Constitutional Principles Should Prevent Ontario From Interfering With Toronto’s Election","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Law; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.057884562189686836,"score_gpt":0.3009605299240338,"score_spread":0.24307596773434698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971392639","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29343945,0.00013075465,0.00563104,0.001264678,0.0006676635,0.00021099328,0.000008220497,0.00010483502,0.69854236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99571276,0.000018894429,0.0005906323,0.00074024656,0.0006923058,0.000019697914,0.000006621404,0.0000023363502,0.0022165275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990939,0.00003118955,0.0001274082,0.0002023317,0.00033663827,0.00020853624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996913,0.000031881817,0.000040371553,0.000056607885,0.00010801715,0.0000718162],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011792804,0.00009461852,0.00010293587,0.0000130866865,0.0010329237,0.000064644635,0.000102303784,0.000045689976,0.004718087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018463496,0.000073930125,0.000035389403,0.00005772321,0.001767223,0.00030149744,0.000056496185,0.000068384164,0.000048833146],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012163527,0.00013181074,0.07361044,8.8543084e-7,0.00014638367,0.0000027829747,0.007296264,0.0000047520216,0.00020713,0.9145722,0.0026969088,0.0012088505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027609974,0.0002115378,0.034236535,0.00005432635,0.00003361124,0.0000027171611,0.0051940875,0.000007446709,0.00068066036,0.004760392,0.9543123,0.00023025298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82286197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9916834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95161545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010536438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005455519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99619174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971590923","doi":"10.21991/cf29387","title":"Ford and Irwin Toy 30 Years Later: A Conversation with Justice Montigny","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Charter; Trilogy; Appeal; Political science; Economic Justice; Politics; Context (archaeology); Sociology; History","score_opus":0.013361277003212772,"score_gpt":0.247270545106371,"score_spread":0.23390926810315824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971590923","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42215812,0.0034080874,0.024241086,0.03020406,0.005118722,0.0033608144,0.00043777653,0.0007691531,0.5103022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99632835,0.00030500203,0.0009881224,0.0014002083,0.00023890185,0.00007403385,0.000053547585,0.000010370774,0.00060143287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730664,0.00009318872,0.00041555974,0.00060663343,0.0007844636,0.00079353765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998597,0.0002320344,0.00018285659,0.00029783338,0.0004006793,0.0002895561],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042732226,0.0003223722,0.00039297505,0.00019968947,0.001957375,0.0001769445,0.00034648858,0.00022058673,0.00075962086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032344152,0.00030627009,0.00011963424,0.0004333208,0.00819355,0.00096041436,0.00020885374,0.00026693707,0.00068437506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010001084,0.00006006988,0.07420994,0.00001929243,0.000109199784,0.000025716081,0.0005111092,0.0002162244,0.00006319077,0.92208546,0.0014564405,0.0011433327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006070973,0.00038573117,0.025465358,0.00058189704,0.00057087425,0.00024373645,0.03298052,0.0005000216,0.00013213888,0.1162757,0.8149447,0.0018483654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011585361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012846601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81348825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002884268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017481719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972952445","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3351","title":"Assessing the Impact of Unilingualism at the Supreme Court of Canada: Panel Composition, Assertiveness, Caseload, and Deference","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Collège de Bois-de-Boulogne; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Supreme court; Assertiveness; Law; Framing (construction); Political science; Exploratory research; Fluency; Empirical research; Social psychology; Sociology; Psychology; Social science; Epistemology; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.059984036293032214,"score_gpt":0.34163936495036534,"score_spread":0.2816553286573331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972952445","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8887035,0.0008948301,0.00007993764,0.0019016464,0.00017499295,0.00007304679,0.00002470154,0.0000038160433,0.10814352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99951506,0.00012933691,0.000024832616,0.0000767553,0.00022473477,8.8259696e-7,9.694731e-7,0.0000027617532,0.000024640187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988528,0.00025267535,0.00021501131,0.000078618505,0.00040258624,0.00019830081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878216,0.00028665367,0.0002260976,0.000072725044,0.0005627667,0.00006958939],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083157036,0.000077960976,0.00015182742,0.000010473347,0.0032151293,0.00007246482,0.00019386603,0.000033043536,0.000071238486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000099481644,0.000041656425,0.000052767533,0.00011812047,0.0018079362,0.0001444925,0.00006132096,0.0001288083,4.864027e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007730296,0.00008061153,0.08106295,0.000008616313,0.00033172348,0.00002759476,0.008065378,0.00012908706,0.0037904691,0.90361506,0.0015362924,0.0012749258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007126679,0.00021846953,0.8005154,0.00038647588,0.00021428544,0.00040375046,0.023977656,0.000101946076,0.004262986,0.16561113,0.0032166971,0.00037850646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95685333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9856904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7380039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001797949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012315493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973016045","doi":"","title":"The Rule of Law All the Way Up","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitutionality; Supreme court; Constitutional law; Adjudication; Presumption; Common law","score_opus":0.013960536004371488,"score_gpt":0.2755018074631724,"score_spread":0.2615412714588009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2973016045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35933506,0.021178367,0.000110186375,0.050525095,0.001853857,0.00029855644,0.0000023074704,0.000024583087,0.56667197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885409,0.006842692,0.0000014278206,0.00028432615,0.00031275893,0.0000018827529,1.376505e-7,0.000002483425,0.0040134015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984763,0.0001034598,0.000128432,0.00005821824,0.0003343769,0.0008991981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995665,0.00016072865,0.000089151166,0.00007096738,0.00008808106,0.000024601823],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002057179,0.000049390255,0.00007682516,0.000008210979,0.0013790957,0.000040616793,0.00034974286,0.000026972575,0.00003671026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055306315,0.00002433762,0.00008363005,0.00008011904,0.0005346423,0.000074015275,0.000032094744,0.00052172184,0.00007654923],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010965073,0.000006492855,0.00048291366,2.2201814e-7,0.000072937306,9.9313944e-8,0.001309792,0.000002259722,0.000034629837,0.9940633,0.00012445258,0.0038918967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000923029,0.0000343642,0.0003887558,0.0000038016517,0.000011995924,0.000005682856,0.008381766,8.4133274e-7,0.000017395945,0.6656676,0.32536104,0.00003446049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048088077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024522485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6292058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002096838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010941952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2974190242","doi":"10.1057/s41599-019-0318-6","title":"A collaboratively derived international research agenda on legislative science advice","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Palgrave Communications","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Advice (programming); Legislature; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.18309972588886794,"score_gpt":0.4623440012752929,"score_spread":0.27924427538642493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2974190242","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023926098,0.00026491596,0.000037238722,0.022840727,0.00029860067,0.00040533952,0.000031183426,0.00006489357,0.952131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968172,0.00078415324,0.0010089602,0.00035223117,0.00007906206,0.000077223645,0.000010145404,0.0000040603136,0.0008670218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979635,0.00041788298,0.00015733956,0.00023228585,0.00091971067,0.00030928818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967291,0.0008371392,0.00007056143,0.0005625201,0.0017185659,0.000082131366],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00173797,0.0000748537,0.00010095026,0.00022449155,0.0033688596,0.00014965232,0.0017691512,0.000039086128,0.0001930965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013506429,0.00007263537,0.00003585294,0.0017155544,0.0042954325,0.00013591016,0.00055615907,0.00028729852,0.0008509112],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011407246,0.000043243686,0.0031017384,5.062605e-7,0.000020511323,3.5421837e-7,0.014935877,0.0000041497938,0.00089710683,0.9794546,0.00045257065,0.0010779778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043356518,0.00010623005,0.053528942,0.000097203454,0.000009958883,5.237336e-7,0.049947146,0.0002519546,0.0003435471,0.123844996,0.7711477,0.00028820915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051631248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075617763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97289103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035296526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010778182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2974310255","doi":"","title":"Comparative Constitutional Law Documents","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Council on Foreign Relations","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.03613144161824953,"score_gpt":0.3168066535058665,"score_spread":0.28067521188761696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2974310255","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39173764,0.00093256333,0.0003498506,0.00048484036,0.00060693466,0.00028316464,0.00030020435,0.00008810947,0.6052167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99796855,0.00031507903,0.0002137298,0.0005475771,0.00035071268,0.0000058919168,0.0003242609,0.000002690507,0.00027149287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987769,0.00013592707,0.00015407891,0.00033740455,0.000299947,0.00029573528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993362,0.00022841542,0.00006369573,0.00023299505,0.00003361623,0.00010508691],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003734889,0.00012047361,0.0002021753,0.00002246281,0.0012147006,0.0001121554,0.00057186803,0.000034962315,0.000079795456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000045873367,0.0001043085,0.000023218336,0.00013129693,0.0014699113,0.00047351216,0.00045941822,0.00011633305,0.00013597134],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033820117,0.000034840807,0.04772357,0.000017051581,0.00009072205,0.0000032384696,0.00798733,0.00012906088,0.000044108594,0.94275147,0.00055846805,0.0006263431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007604886,0.000053769578,0.05493079,0.0004286109,0.00008719508,0.0000075003254,0.017756717,0.005021193,0.000009582922,0.053140648,0.867218,0.0005854583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0141921975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023625674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8896108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023363162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000084528496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99419063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2974701945","doi":"","title":"Introductory Essay: The Rule of Law as the Rule of Artificial Reason","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Principle of legality; Law; Philosophy of law; Public law; Rule of law; Legal profession; Legal realism; Private law; Empirical legal studies; Legal formalism; Comparative law; Political science; Legal history; Black letter law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010578732188041744,"score_gpt":0.2655878664654505,"score_spread":0.2550091342774088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2974701945","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8707773,0.006868546,0.000045193723,0.01972909,0.000734512,0.00020705936,0.0000037105474,0.000011965003,0.10162262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99651724,0.0014228178,0.000004229829,0.000193359,0.0008854518,0.0000024461726,4.5152498e-7,0.0000044389612,0.0009695627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819535,0.00019126959,0.00023887458,0.000103174185,0.00050779,0.0007635139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993099,0.0001480775,0.00021022664,0.0001269992,0.00017675728,0.00002802337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025583769,0.00007714283,0.00016344065,0.000022822618,0.000818371,0.000024479239,0.0003958033,0.000046299752,0.00012556062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016255178,0.000043435415,0.00012178464,0.00017304947,0.0009375209,0.000102393846,0.000046533172,0.00064761593,0.000059983813],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038260798,0.00003438518,0.0007792251,0.0000012281703,0.00008950784,1.992807e-7,0.003800144,0.0000110044975,0.0005879852,0.98990536,0.00005298738,0.0046997275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012733757,0.00010692673,0.0010061766,0.000016544072,0.000043030643,0.000012787492,0.015881613,0.0000022545687,0.00047666702,0.92918855,0.053062737,0.000075351396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009967265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071694343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12573995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027309736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029151535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2976100056","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1374","title":"A Chief and Court in Transition: The Wagner Court and the Constitution","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Dissent; Majority opinion; Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Concurring opinion; Economic Justice; Political science; Roberts Court; Constitution; Precedent; Original jurisdiction; Court of record; Politics","score_opus":0.03622582227224764,"score_gpt":0.28642562578894604,"score_spread":0.2501998035166984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2976100056","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001447397,0.26480314,0.00011879036,0.6345976,0.0001427213,0.0011776366,0.00001823532,0.000038650564,0.097655855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8111565,0.16643132,0.000014423614,0.022101885,0.00022052944,0.00005496741,0.0000024989142,0.0000024792585,0.000015381554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987821,0.0003133746,0.00023241088,0.00018908308,0.00030069362,0.00018233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995219,0.00019071448,0.000053264168,0.00008129224,0.0000770753,0.00007574173],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011239244,0.000111264046,0.00029716615,0.00000688908,0.0009889577,0.000057063506,0.00014136455,0.00004069065,0.00009565971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018722778,0.00006113136,0.00006331963,0.00022001579,0.0034557185,0.0001343713,0.000044536897,0.00016470745,0.000019349409],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020153828,0.00000986284,0.00013766266,0.00009894396,0.000020167414,0.0000041688377,0.0022161433,0.0000010570392,0.000002129826,0.9924616,0.0035626092,0.0014654531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054051034,0.000017306327,0.00038771806,0.0006446449,0.000116599265,0.000007549761,0.0007781486,0.00002378784,0.0000010388576,0.011261825,0.9861057,0.00011518655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034286939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046650353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98254305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022928603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012133545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978234545","doi":"10.1017/cco9781139342551.005","title":"Legislative supremacy in a multidimensional constitution","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Legislature; Political science; State (computer science); Law; Constitutional law; Function (biology); Common law; Core (optical fiber); Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.06616505942170775,"score_gpt":0.26698039211769187,"score_spread":0.20081533269598412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978234545","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000083860315,0.0007726893,0.00006016652,0.00009053111,0.00035440005,0.00041877973,0.00017671629,0.00007462707,0.99796826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023779806,0.00031167502,0.000057072422,0.000042715405,0.00022819616,0.0000010220056,0.000029174049,0.000007700095,0.97554266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986283,0.00008405024,0.00016109126,0.00035369745,0.00049939007,0.00027343532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910176,0.00010617636,0.00013399251,0.00013030376,0.00036604292,0.00016174006],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026061066,0.00022218573,0.00032912928,0.00015965196,0.0005391463,0.000018513147,0.00021823906,0.00028662483,0.000011185947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000067984656,0.00026197586,0.000118773765,0.000016927701,0.0020565523,0.00013649886,0.00021538496,0.00034310276,0.00003691519],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007240115,0.000011374564,0.000017373659,0.000004548297,0.000054710712,0.00020322869,0.00055643613,0.000006141988,0.000003465173,0.9839207,0.014613036,0.0005365632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051870197,0.00001597956,0.00003247937,0.00015793418,0.000059675684,0.0000021263568,0.00031788615,0.000005950534,0.0000036328506,0.0005891966,0.99800545,0.0002909976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01808407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013867319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9833924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065520237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001156288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978729991","doi":"","title":"Erga Omnes or Inter Partes? The Legal Effects of Federal Courts’ Constitutional Judgments","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Constitution; Deference; Federal jurisdiction; Jurisprudence; Res judicata; Exclusive jurisdiction; Statutory law; Supreme court","score_opus":0.02794251358819732,"score_gpt":0.2919764639386901,"score_spread":0.26403395035049276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978729991","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016749687,0.19173536,0.000024707186,0.24275112,0.0034412395,0.004055613,0.000091848735,0.00004669089,0.5411037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97963697,0.0090470845,0.0000040623704,0.008908705,0.00017802643,0.000038571594,0.0000029479727,0.000002734261,0.002180897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899733,0.0001924219,0.00017150026,0.00010931492,0.00027506737,0.000254378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993418,0.00022174849,0.00007225257,0.00013706657,0.0001103889,0.00011673405],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005257019,0.00009003733,0.00021409431,0.00001672965,0.0010354404,0.000046938523,0.00032407526,0.000031695366,0.0009433262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034306565,0.000044891676,0.00011083168,0.00014192365,0.0015993459,0.000084286614,0.000033118627,0.00010692211,0.00038691467],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000416122,0.000007078159,0.0016805121,0.00012394054,0.00006933992,0.0000061520195,0.00025356477,5.908383e-7,0.0000012052132,0.9622808,0.033406086,0.0021665285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000098080316,0.000017737524,0.0017349444,0.0010762204,0.000056737714,0.000005221448,0.000115255396,5.766073e-7,0.0000031379602,0.0021719874,0.99464107,0.0000790131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20063043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5299492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9628873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016024044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017270173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979350335","doi":"10.4324/9780429032400-6","title":"Constitutionalists’ guide to the populist challenge","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Political science; Law; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.05124004654010909,"score_gpt":0.31629934416876837,"score_spread":0.26505929762865926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979350335","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[7.9838344e-7,0.0016287036,0.00011634005,0.051405583,0.0013582589,0.00048600027,0.00007797096,0.0000740654,0.9448523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008503039,0.0012049268,0.00006613072,0.0041523795,0.0018882471,0.000015163555,0.000018002207,0.000010069867,0.98414207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846417,0.000023316898,0.00024171035,0.00030185716,0.0007114785,0.00025745918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992162,0.00013091421,0.00007992767,0.0002165427,0.0002461038,0.0001102966],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037911098,0.0001992125,0.0002538212,0.00004823217,0.0013003388,0.000063362444,0.00044305882,0.00018807949,0.003417725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012974396,0.00013553732,0.00016127668,0.00003782591,0.0011522506,0.0000521705,0.00016758339,0.00019335686,0.006975077],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031869324,0.000004458683,0.000009473664,0.0000018467588,0.000042879456,0.0000039518377,0.00026812762,0.0000021197104,8.224054e-8,0.82615924,0.17242914,0.0010755139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000434371,0.000012717865,0.000027838138,0.000048498474,0.000025510428,9.2695456e-7,0.00028196027,1.1295159e-7,1.0272496e-7,0.10090772,0.89845806,0.00019313864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010015098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05056871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7260289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021037598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009713301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980370897","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebz013","title":"One Parent, Three Parents: Judges and Ontario’s All Families Are Equal Act, 2016","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Champion; Legislation; Discretion; Law; Variety (cybernetics); Diversity (politics); Family law; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.055754113234218874,"score_gpt":0.3267932573809631,"score_spread":0.27103914414674424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980370897","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84779745,0.0019433019,0.000030455665,0.018669983,0.0008188542,0.000111805566,0.000025816635,0.000008162885,0.13059418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99282426,0.0024814007,0.000021147354,0.003418479,0.0009059007,0.0000021331898,0.000001153896,0.0000032645548,0.00034227595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998883,0.00007686421,0.00025437624,0.00009371204,0.00053191703,0.00016015096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906605,0.00029617245,0.00024779042,0.00004953382,0.00026567964,0.000074777556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047109736,0.00008882367,0.00020355664,0.00006694051,0.0002610486,0.000119200326,0.0003028515,0.000043279804,0.000028005958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001379726,0.000059374983,0.00007978039,0.000039260496,0.00090040686,0.00027992597,0.00011567434,0.0001543371,0.00001466705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024124328,0.00004017916,0.058092363,0.0000017201047,0.00034945767,0.000005069546,0.005098905,0.000003935537,0.000023743936,0.9340414,0.00023473332,0.0018672746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025194967,0.0000857836,0.26690227,0.00018202554,0.00007369125,0.00001908069,0.005461695,0.000003234825,0.00000877815,0.4440326,0.28053898,0.00017238891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22081776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13375852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49000877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013310072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028700606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88204813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980752423","doi":"10.24908/fede.v8i1.13641","title":"Putting the Safe Back Into the Safeguards of Federalism: A Comparative Analysis of the Complexities of Political Safeguards","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federalism-E","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Politics; Safeguarding; Cooperative federalism; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Law; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.06402983847341878,"score_gpt":0.3599904355581284,"score_spread":0.29596059708470956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980752423","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6045081,0.0006242685,0.00039820306,0.031408634,0.00037060355,0.00050238153,0.00009856418,0.000018240517,0.36207098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982903,0.000021557182,0.0002542897,0.0008180405,0.00022545437,0.000006028705,0.000005320248,0.000003961334,0.00037503676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972841,0.0004907882,0.00067604333,0.0001821587,0.0009392677,0.00042760785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975159,0.0012356036,0.0003917287,0.0002706063,0.00052315125,0.00006299265],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016842228,0.00016108528,0.00057985575,0.00008694575,0.0019944794,0.0000514359,0.0006390775,0.00007101253,0.00018594755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028948102,0.00008256123,0.00044993314,0.0011935084,0.0049345223,0.000084794985,0.00021733993,0.00017826057,0.0000046819846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003608606,0.000051238003,0.0077552698,0.000009421813,0.0006900123,3.9644527e-7,0.043420125,0.00006640509,0.00014072286,0.9465969,0.0008918419,0.0003415763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043327844,0.00008487674,0.630814,0.00012395119,0.0010083916,0.0000016559311,0.13728456,0.000107207925,0.0022169403,0.19595128,0.03170615,0.0002676985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10818164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08911583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75064564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011021414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027463405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981848832","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190640484.003.0005","title":"The Three Varieties of Unamendability","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art","score_opus":0.038394757950436245,"score_gpt":0.27481300618394555,"score_spread":0.23641824823350932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981848832","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001557484,0.0013802326,0.00004080251,0.0021435143,0.0004842973,0.00018648815,0.000012893023,0.000021436777,0.9957148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0858805,0.0013686607,0.000016540369,0.000078782556,0.00024718678,0.0000029676494,0.0000014189449,0.0000048612364,0.91239905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918145,0.0000135572345,0.00016699663,0.0001218367,0.00039406898,0.0001220981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921316,0.0003430561,0.000098370096,0.00014091548,0.0001820288,0.000022479056],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040716704,0.000089836445,0.00017760317,0.000011383033,0.0006698862,0.000019955878,0.00022058142,0.00012114231,0.00091345486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008340892,0.000053892505,0.00011690898,0.000015138011,0.0023773783,0.000027034708,0.000088341774,0.00011182825,0.00017631214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054231923,0.000002709585,0.00021159418,0.0000029074015,0.000047214155,1.2099966e-7,0.0002228001,1.7429714e-7,1.5226527e-7,0.99348736,0.0017306231,0.004288945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011696953,0.0000073505726,0.00018155933,0.000006784321,0.000010402857,2.1257371e-8,0.00017136746,9.094298e-8,3.6498855e-7,0.5102352,0.4893348,0.000040383533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006144003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04134374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48760417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005433057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004954192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982313139","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0051","title":"‘Repugnant’: Homosexuality and Criminal Family Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Decriminalization; Homosexuality; Criminal law; State (computer science); Law; State of exception; Political science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.04238659385392869,"score_gpt":0.2583657877288654,"score_spread":0.21597919387493675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982313139","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10984093,0.0030553485,0.00036919423,0.0042868727,0.00018022128,0.00006122052,0.00001638829,0.000024520596,0.8821653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99800825,0.000873858,0.00033958926,0.0005080736,0.0001908544,1.1470567e-8,3.1272762e-7,0.0000011738333,0.000077891695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939704,0.0000798054,0.00007415433,0.000088004264,0.00023339495,0.00012758825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995869,0.000030489766,0.00006775471,0.000027560429,0.000114326576,0.00017299167],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017848036,0.000049396578,0.000121790654,0.0000030559493,0.0017248954,0.000024684112,0.00014478917,0.000035664187,0.0002665089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021447908,0.000052314925,0.000049787905,0.00001952823,0.0010677427,0.0003525336,0.00006643886,0.000078805926,0.0000042765464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054484695,0.00002276978,0.000637081,0.000004432582,0.00003707359,0.00003250342,0.019706791,9.757903e-7,0.00009079237,0.9765489,0.0008043425,0.0020598297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056461303,0.00015442136,0.010635788,0.000026609778,0.00010287824,0.000007902876,0.16647576,0.0000049732425,0.000014417062,0.007784468,0.81406415,0.00016404258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37872773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29239234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9687645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000089733854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007924888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2983026857","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199485079.001.0001","title":"Appointment of Judges to the Supreme Court of India","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Judicial independence; Political science; Constitution; Context (archaeology); Doctrine; Judicial review; Constitutional law; Constitution of India; Separation of powers; Independence (probability theory); Judicial activism; Judicial opinion; History","score_opus":0.029711430306558286,"score_gpt":0.24121194795324946,"score_spread":0.21150051764669117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2983026857","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005042001,0.00008459221,0.000044144956,0.00020767719,0.00018312097,0.00041804634,0.00016655211,0.00001809912,0.99837357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020264367,0.00026156756,0.000076070835,0.000079683414,0.0002987261,0.0000014696392,0.000008548609,0.00000669511,0.9790029],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990046,0.000080021855,0.00013471453,0.00016848913,0.00043797045,0.00017418891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991987,0.00010150698,0.00018768116,0.00018038659,0.0002653033,0.00006642115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024791804,0.00012042619,0.00026272086,0.000067663066,0.0004498696,0.00000850494,0.0005750097,0.00013726554,0.00004171176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030532377,0.00010240424,0.00012648737,0.000025395138,0.0013502807,0.000029876936,0.00034052707,0.00010596041,0.0000017828764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051908348,0.000015653462,0.00007326453,0.000018088442,0.0001623822,0.000003235344,0.004614622,0.0000014621853,0.0000025122847,0.928517,0.06534674,0.0011931652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001059158,0.000067487854,0.00013330155,0.00008031153,0.00010882561,1.5587221e-7,0.0012303025,1.766192e-7,0.000043028544,0.0030214647,0.995103,0.00010601399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002091467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018069787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9297563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018024743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005884142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49751654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990891170","doi":"","title":"There Ought to be a Law: Gustav Radbruch, Lon L. Fuller, and H.L.A. Hart on the Choice Between Natural Law and Legal Positivism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal positivism; Legal profession; Legal realism; Natural law; Jurisprudence; Positive law; Positivism; Political science; Comparative law; Legal history; Philosophy of law; Legal formalism; Black letter law; Sociology; Private law","score_opus":0.01236310018512925,"score_gpt":0.264966744970287,"score_spread":0.25260364478515773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990891170","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84986955,0.0061117345,0.000022392267,0.06256955,0.00026308655,0.00030089467,0.000006715706,0.0000236396,0.08083242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99228394,0.00118085,0.0000059606473,0.0034562293,0.00076093304,0.0000039502133,9.357322e-7,0.000007408513,0.0022997889],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980306,0.0001596552,0.00013891299,0.00019385452,0.00039985985,0.0010771066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942875,0.00026119922,0.00006454813,0.00007443709,0.00006938211,0.000101702186],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010364178,0.00013626511,0.00017851553,0.00002854562,0.0015800758,0.00019262264,0.00019496835,0.000060664297,0.000024469551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058978818,0.00008909322,0.000057050845,0.00012470593,0.000388659,0.0002329012,0.00006729634,0.0009809426,0.00002805715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030676907,0.00001179481,0.0015377222,0.0000010017973,0.000101854625,0.0000020574437,0.00069976057,6.2305077e-7,0.000059606304,0.9955836,0.00021405051,0.0017572748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092412136,0.0006978315,0.0129014095,0.00008897709,0.00009389913,0.00008433888,0.013301487,0.0000029287698,0.000083810875,0.35057005,0.620801,0.00045018486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012928821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05658942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6450135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002862228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004930798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990994885","doi":"10.1007/s11366-019-09642-x","title":"Kwai Hang Ng and Xin He, Embedded Courts: Judicial Decision-Making in China","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Chinese Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Hang; China; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.009676730435413424,"score_gpt":0.3425033309141789,"score_spread":0.33282660047876544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990994885","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9530143,0.00026539218,0.00019814238,0.004907283,0.00073946855,0.00009324368,0.0000020190448,0.000007623465,0.040772505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99836063,0.000046667938,0.00050092844,0.00049375405,0.0005725662,7.5421445e-7,4.108075e-8,0.0000031047816,0.000021543085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974779,0.000072023024,0.00041213847,0.00018921946,0.0011650114,0.000683719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863535,0.00055631157,0.00014219219,0.0000745679,0.00023880503,0.0003527565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002326775,0.00011000922,0.0003027449,0.0002446991,0.0005586724,0.00014481918,0.00040028966,0.000054965392,0.00010997176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004091296,0.00007694503,0.00007073102,0.0007961116,0.0017410804,0.00070755277,0.00014656776,0.0002557843,0.00001620225],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057676174,0.00007728149,0.27929494,0.00000407071,0.000008523173,0.000041876283,0.0031288436,0.000031274718,0.00029442078,0.7129232,0.000061113715,0.004076725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025264066,0.00005245643,0.53846484,0.00015178142,0.0000057704565,0.000025306777,0.000873862,0.00013494292,0.00000723209,0.45957813,0.00035254686,0.00010048781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015457593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010164954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2591699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026548005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008285168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64150834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991032491","doi":"10.3917/cdlj.1201.0113","title":"Le défi de la théocratie constitutionnelle","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de la Justice","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011690541414848474,"score_gpt":0.2778561657345244,"score_spread":0.2661656243196759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991032491","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045020275,0.028312784,0.016225409,0.0062190206,0.0020802524,0.00013562421,0.000033421387,0.00008327125,0.9018899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982144,0.0035976744,0.0019883288,0.0017032744,0.0021996195,0.000020489664,0.000003349232,0.000010638128,0.0083326455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744123,0.0011352571,0.00019966078,0.00018515556,0.00028190343,0.00075679686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99754447,0.0018713886,0.00009084219,0.00010571663,0.000077710014,0.0003098542],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015610516,0.00018306247,0.00020944962,0.000040488845,0.0026172244,0.00009381985,0.00021983014,0.0005242612,0.00022392678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011735874,0.000200399,0.00011761036,0.00035551295,0.012589602,0.00034688172,0.00006157958,0.0005855544,0.00021641294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015165457,0.00019685875,0.004351094,0.00005161128,0.00008325419,0.000025769024,0.015027052,0.00015825187,0.000075042386,0.9664269,0.010372158,0.0032168112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003154432,0.000018533814,0.0037215254,0.00008022192,0.00052937603,0.000059246056,0.029813992,0.000041819672,0.00007373297,0.10846681,0.85658705,0.00029225863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010541735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005662908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9371237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011597256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99868125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991114952","doi":"10.21991/cf29390","title":"The Notwithstanding Clause and the New Populism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Legislature; Political science; Law; Context (archaeology); Convention; Politics; Populism; Commerce Clause; Power (physics); Establishment Clause; Dormant Commerce Clause; Law and economics; Sociology; Federalism; First amendment; Supreme court; History","score_opus":0.015098768931774672,"score_gpt":0.2648937825354698,"score_spread":0.24979501360369513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991114952","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010500817,0.017468305,0.020042919,0.25706533,0.0088171465,0.0027551828,0.000105252526,0.00037092247,0.68287414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99193287,0.0014970903,0.00014475129,0.002394721,0.0005038967,0.00005121034,0.00001105735,0.000006931828,0.003457496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99717295,0.00019437356,0.00049013656,0.00044045775,0.0008396755,0.0008623954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779236,0.0011559352,0.00019422412,0.00031604548,0.00026893988,0.0002725028],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012047973,0.00028878148,0.0003435856,0.00008494076,0.011194508,0.00041813034,0.00054495735,0.00016402472,0.0001773291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011050847,0.00017441333,0.00021665008,0.00045166418,0.024186049,0.00058368605,0.00028787437,0.00037853344,0.00041316892],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017261694,0.000015511438,0.012393431,0.000002638948,0.00009985965,0.0000041407975,0.00043549482,0.00005397618,0.0000107980795,0.97473675,0.010625989,0.0014488215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018982678,0.000016900161,0.0005537287,0.00006503857,0.00005196658,0.00004315823,0.0073951785,0.00006431915,0.000007811641,0.30414182,0.68550664,0.00025516524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036986303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046563116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.981432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024431467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026453224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99009275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992063119","doi":"","title":"Article I Judges in an Article III World: The Career Path of Magistrate Judges","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Magistrate; Law; Political science; Adjudication; Deference","score_opus":0.028307043287376522,"score_gpt":0.28094575714051123,"score_spread":0.2526387138531347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992063119","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9310027,0.00045661666,0.000011565315,0.008272312,0.00014114635,0.00016246698,0.000011845949,0.000042644668,0.059898734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99811256,0.000056431865,0.00004447695,0.0006156386,0.00024296159,0.000024166195,6.0830877e-7,0.0000055367427,0.0008976204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986423,0.0001826358,0.00024798544,0.00020508475,0.00036363926,0.00035832767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933064,0.00014856436,0.00006141567,0.0002078371,0.0001242804,0.00012725679],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006246837,0.00009786094,0.00016229639,0.000032150238,0.0004626923,0.000056258483,0.0002872504,0.000044425367,0.00053415226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016612571,0.00005827655,0.000056370594,0.0003774436,0.0011550803,0.00037480632,0.00006717028,0.00010045989,0.00015363767],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032703225,0.0000901365,0.33671528,0.0000020783075,0.000015236125,0.000007170952,0.0015251284,0.000009523461,0.002745218,0.6556254,0.0006165073,0.002615648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015684023,0.00012290152,0.7523044,0.00012277435,0.000047408954,0.0000012674503,0.010915878,0.0000145685035,0.007520718,0.17455648,0.05235528,0.00046995952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019694263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26846704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4810689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000083756924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012960554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9868337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992387905","doi":"","title":"Proportionality in Sentence Appeals: Towards a Guiding Principle of Appellate Review","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Sentence; Law; Political science; Sentencing guidelines; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04974857846533353,"score_gpt":0.3596111677466684,"score_spread":0.30986258928133487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992387905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62775636,0.16814423,0.0054869424,0.02854926,0.00093644875,0.0012464076,0.00000893161,0.000080583326,0.16779087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9272151,0.07192831,0.00004246448,0.00017402739,0.00035919354,0.0000041172093,4.9553404e-7,0.0000028887268,0.00027339678],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783945,0.0001611674,0.00039189908,0.0001316731,0.00047379412,0.0010019937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933684,0.000020203295,0.00022290178,0.00006471225,0.0003042954,0.00005105848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005019182,0.000076442724,0.00020544369,0.00004836999,0.0004285552,0.000011408554,0.00021779677,0.000036353522,0.0000642965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004986736,0.00006389857,0.00008224264,0.00039229315,0.00052871084,0.0001291696,0.00004728739,0.00030739018,0.000021589824],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016517532,0.000049728274,0.013367656,0.000026935797,0.000043351054,0.0000018150346,0.0004296859,9.0003033e-7,0.000051333027,0.9724366,0.00007645325,0.013499032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031612665,0.00017765716,0.009949111,0.0013250574,0.000042964504,0.0000566181,0.0032064626,0.0000065089885,0.000097059194,0.90790486,0.076695815,0.00022172682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031762281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015185015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29945877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062704907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041913963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8473595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992569009","doi":"","title":"All Together Now: Government Bill Bundling in the 42nd Parliament","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Legislature; Legislation; House of Commons; Government (linguistics); Consistency (knowledge bases); Law; Political science; Public administration; Law and economics; Legislative intent; Session (web analytics); Commons; Bill of rights; Politics; Economics; Business; Advertising; Computer science; Constitution","score_opus":0.04892776545096016,"score_gpt":0.3084681052847461,"score_spread":0.25954033983378594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992569009","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01756538,0.19950047,0.000013851473,0.33967766,0.0014435517,0.002757574,0.0001620978,0.00004219908,0.4388372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7428289,0.1142298,0.00007905035,0.14130089,0.00093761575,0.00017866961,0.000011553405,0.00001071981,0.00042280153],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983004,0.0002268731,0.0002582576,0.00022521785,0.0005067266,0.00048257643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994391,0.00006787774,0.00006146078,0.00017338194,0.000039625098,0.00021853023],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001099353,0.00012995524,0.00020775633,0.000024204895,0.00055988436,0.000046475434,0.00037699036,0.000037378642,0.0012690683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000703852,0.00008373527,0.00007748022,0.00028582322,0.00048634835,0.00009584248,0.000028667735,0.000111544294,0.00047391682],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013925989,0.00016589923,0.05602446,0.00017663506,0.00022264713,0.00013259778,0.012205579,0.0000015093506,0.0000090037765,0.05630742,0.7237851,0.1509552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007469368,0.000026723998,0.0018224859,0.00058158423,0.000039490817,0.0000014675104,0.0031808235,6.7789733e-7,0.000002361319,0.0014552858,0.9926793,0.00013511667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72474176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96595496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72526354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009755652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045064566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992685277","doi":"10.3138/utlj.69.s1.004","title":"Remedial discretion and dilemmas in Asia","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Remedial education; Legislation; Reinterpretation; Political science; Law; Judicial discretion; Judicial review; Discretion; Constitutionality; Government (linguistics); Judicial restraint; Judicial activism; Law and economics; Supreme court; Sociology","score_opus":0.00941150560976816,"score_gpt":0.22191570462976817,"score_spread":0.21250419902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992685277","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43078542,0.00049185083,0.00009227209,0.0010374124,0.00026383833,0.00006272524,0.000001798613,0.0000051829475,0.5672595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988309,0.00068829366,0.000105514446,0.000011069631,0.00007068364,7.900204e-9,2.3152653e-7,5.6987557e-7,0.00029269006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963725,0.00004477547,0.000044926455,0.000046944555,0.00014573376,0.000080347185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99983835,0.00002004086,0.000040323906,0.000018367586,0.000039366907,0.00004355209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018665253,0.00002552972,0.00006909932,0.0000078832145,0.00034985,0.000008668512,0.00006581944,0.000028068753,0.0006496395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009810699,0.000026635866,0.000023908051,0.00001549332,0.00028386348,0.00028795504,0.000019895795,0.000050295217,0.000004636455],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000842426,0.000029760458,0.06049819,0.000002021604,0.00001925484,0.000015441703,0.010873125,0.0000049814776,0.000077161014,0.9232219,0.00016544014,0.0050085112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016581913,0.00015924232,0.35845602,0.00013080046,0.000035072146,0.0000093828385,0.1098056,0.000020185713,0.000012417176,0.020268235,0.50922495,0.00021989079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.226684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7021551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9029536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013921408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045355868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77846557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992928199","doi":"","title":"Ensuring constitutional wisdom during unconventional times","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Governor; Law; Administration (probate law); Political science; Public administration; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.025808902695350168,"score_gpt":0.2844943193449863,"score_spread":0.2586854166496361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992928199","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011582597,0.24499775,0.000022082424,0.06779587,0.00092502526,0.00094142434,0.00016106895,0.00011341951,0.6734608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94934225,0.03685585,0.000081327096,0.012295249,0.00053599256,0.000022752098,0.000049103102,0.0000031874326,0.00081427814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987956,0.000075621574,0.0002303668,0.00020181459,0.00030554313,0.00039101648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993667,0.000026768752,0.000052858726,0.00008744427,0.00007631765,0.00038992785],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028935753,0.00011675602,0.00020703099,0.000064796346,0.0012416005,0.00003115711,0.0001649941,0.000037162114,0.0033602386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000739595,0.00012058458,0.000115504896,0.00022750767,0.00081749924,0.00018516793,0.000011569018,0.00009816091,0.00035495043],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039806882,0.000028419103,0.00609757,0.00007452184,0.000066487315,0.000087886816,0.00014888674,0.0000043297973,0.0000099068675,0.93932134,0.042872872,0.01128379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017651255,0.00001325182,0.013245583,0.0014239199,0.000056107583,0.000015849502,0.00034215502,4.612992e-7,0.000004690597,0.012821232,0.9716565,0.00024372569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.099320956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19385263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93775964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055922545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013754348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99755085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993070474","doi":"10.3138/utlj.69.s1.001","title":"Interim remedies and constitutional rights","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interim; Law; Political science; Charter; Plaintiff; Common law; Limiting; Constitution; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.014208744565499847,"score_gpt":0.23841466989568655,"score_spread":0.2242059253301867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993070474","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07784907,0.0013653754,0.00033711753,0.00072362454,0.0004714195,0.000051769224,0.000004276632,0.000010372287,0.91918695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99842185,0.00054239365,0.00022845597,0.00003224648,0.000100910154,9.139568e-9,3.168514e-7,4.1821244e-7,0.0006734043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995778,0.000037302234,0.000054266475,0.000058406506,0.00018046935,0.00009172334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997037,0.00003302099,0.000054095446,0.000024420113,0.0001193213,0.000065454005],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015003805,0.000036475467,0.000090036345,0.000007937056,0.0011054128,0.000013506095,0.000094011644,0.0000296545,0.0014433303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010484928,0.00003538733,0.000038172406,0.000011507424,0.0033788607,0.0003327173,0.000042290605,0.0000524365,0.000014487309],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024015324,0.000011986898,0.002627852,0.0000012258018,0.000033218792,0.0000067968513,0.0023723575,9.309929e-7,0.00003493341,0.9939469,0.0006038952,0.00033590526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004340814,0.00005541313,0.0045879097,0.00005766659,0.000024510102,0.000016399601,0.016803073,0.0000023661541,0.000010994509,0.028148428,0.9497682,0.00009100083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08430865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17187707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96579844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012602903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000083760424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993318716","doi":"","title":"The Charter at 30: A Reflection","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitutionalism; Transformative learning; Constitution; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Politics; State (computer science); Constitutional law; Reflection (computer programming); Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.05762100584181712,"score_gpt":0.3022370486789722,"score_spread":0.2446160428371551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993318716","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041989453,0.19519655,0.00069344166,0.047693677,0.02557481,0.0007076412,0.000057730605,0.00018296651,0.6879037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95168763,0.018713,0.0000839128,0.00041108357,0.008165723,0.00007885798,0.0000072584075,0.000010862993,0.020841692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976787,0.00029499037,0.0004187174,0.0003002622,0.0003890854,0.000918276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867094,0.00044924012,0.00019041251,0.00023469958,0.00019451062,0.0002602054],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009250454,0.0002712387,0.000271845,0.000045797482,0.0073680175,0.00012323151,0.00028342387,0.00023315557,0.0008802953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031294642,0.00022016357,0.00023021513,0.00048289212,0.0061853114,0.0005128762,0.00018447013,0.0002676737,0.0028018102],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002237841,0.00014277436,0.00570759,0.000021397618,0.00015193259,0.000004365408,0.003134351,0.000020537658,0.000083307394,0.9726896,0.010555898,0.007465825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018661194,0.000027595526,0.0022447715,0.00017913901,0.0001345413,0.000057983227,0.0031813607,0.000016274971,0.00004126456,0.0067371186,0.98689574,0.0002976025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014301602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038443422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9763398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008126068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033224365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99797463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993485449","doi":"","title":"Parliamentary Rules Concerning Private Members’ Bills","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Legislation; Government (linguistics); Task (project management); Law; Business; Political science; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.05150391308401827,"score_gpt":0.3084666213593609,"score_spread":0.2569627082753427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993485449","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07381114,0.31302312,0.000022871933,0.060226835,0.0028618935,0.0022631346,0.00037108807,0.00024291365,0.547177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6283225,0.25753725,0.00075887464,0.10796329,0.0034504645,0.00019622389,0.00016426326,0.000041522355,0.0015656117],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981457,0.00017643177,0.00032902308,0.00032892698,0.00036290093,0.0006570055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988956,0.000060256658,0.000106075095,0.00019982024,0.000112745656,0.0006255113],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005786378,0.00018878709,0.00034442637,0.00007706752,0.0014913011,0.000057275716,0.0003682441,0.000056955825,0.008789203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011253113,0.00017696817,0.00011890728,0.00035709614,0.001292895,0.00024250412,0.000051899773,0.00012388633,0.0014243498],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000100462585,0.000041261846,0.059071023,0.00024614224,0.00034616273,0.00008581965,0.0030265872,4.8139657e-7,0.000014647728,0.08940122,0.6922771,0.15547954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009953507,0.000032257347,0.0016022503,0.0013073159,0.0000812157,0.0000029187443,0.0012132281,6.623818e-7,0.000008722237,0.0020579651,0.99335,0.00024391117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7812172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8650254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55451137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071041845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094658695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993557111","doi":"10.3138/utlj.69.s1.005","title":"Choosing between simple and complex remedies in socio-economic rights cases","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Simple (philosophy); Ideal (ethics); Law and economics; Work (physics); Dialogical self; Political science; Law; Economic Justice; Human rights; Sociology; Epistemology; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029304648008640122,"score_gpt":0.2639876908291506,"score_spread":0.23468304282051045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993557111","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86429876,0.00049836753,0.00000931141,0.00072291686,0.00011470914,0.000052356492,0.00000838222,0.0000061663172,0.13428901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992596,0.0003792469,0.000104293205,0.00001543345,0.0001351478,9.527697e-9,8.9252376e-7,9.003894e-7,0.00010451137],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956965,0.000054316366,0.00007738332,0.000069486436,0.000104916464,0.00012426965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971867,0.00009148486,0.0000711916,0.000025895895,0.00003507943,0.00005770982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001886335,0.000042801777,0.00014297511,0.0000126631685,0.0009667809,0.000016728629,0.00009662197,0.000032928863,0.0006445128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006521032,0.000045217494,0.00003684447,0.000010227353,0.00047716402,0.0003467261,0.00004531856,0.00005677006,0.000007800562],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005701568,0.000028138924,0.50390476,0.000006966237,0.00011170476,0.00004209115,0.018429914,0.00001752813,0.00004163008,0.472779,0.0020063187,0.0025749507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010423098,0.00008883472,0.4009027,0.000067781504,0.000046868776,0.000009644056,0.06780375,0.0000097401335,0.000005991864,0.033534605,0.4962786,0.00020914976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.60727614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75780493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49427232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035207535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006255092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74357945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993987532","doi":"","title":"Parliamentarians and the New Code of Ethics","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Code (set theory); Political science; Programming language; Computer science","score_opus":0.05326371623557837,"score_gpt":0.32457692390065696,"score_spread":0.2713132076650786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993987532","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008068711,0.39451596,0.00001972519,0.54424036,0.00017668812,0.0006687394,0.000054578115,0.000012243896,0.059504844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31023508,0.58847034,0.0002797126,0.0995322,0.00054789457,0.000031611406,0.000009414136,0.000006971183,0.000886799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902177,0.00019283086,0.00021824274,0.00011998759,0.00022280436,0.00022434715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993247,0.00018061587,0.00006766123,0.00010593066,0.000045097033,0.00027601584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009449518,0.000079897814,0.00023389731,0.000022501352,0.00059953064,0.000017771945,0.00018122945,0.000041096653,0.0006463699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019039943,0.000057503927,0.00006337368,0.00015427312,0.0010699144,0.00008565079,0.00002148188,0.00015177959,0.000037835573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011554398,0.000013309265,0.004522663,0.00013175902,0.00012734813,0.0000041206517,0.007468422,0.0000018613943,8.9782463e-7,0.5408285,0.31196415,0.13492543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022320054,0.000006103012,0.00037858123,0.0004854359,0.00008349425,0.0000014187365,0.0012174052,5.483109e-7,0.0000014573593,0.003825968,0.99370456,0.000071853705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8426742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9786998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6817404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017530278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015344308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7077297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998326803","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12340046","title":"A Curious Decision by Zambia’s Highest Court: Six Years Imprisonment for Civil Contempt?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contempt; Law; Supreme court; Imprisonment; Political science; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.023376209581378288,"score_gpt":0.3157166741412048,"score_spread":0.29234046455982654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998326803","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8555918,0.06226341,0.0010714752,0.041985735,0.0057336707,0.001179046,0.00011525599,0.000057353715,0.032002293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957245,0.002464648,0.00028113442,0.00027266945,0.00046657224,0.000011611191,4.953367e-7,0.000008155611,0.00077022036],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983017,0.00007067532,0.00044906643,0.00015818603,0.00068773044,0.00033267043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831754,0.0006437236,0.0003778339,0.00007344543,0.00046891376,0.00011854029],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008388748,0.00013720758,0.00047585435,0.00006684525,0.0004920082,0.00006191182,0.0002638485,0.00004671734,0.00003598783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005047243,0.00011019064,0.00020489476,0.00017579319,0.00049467233,0.00023484709,0.00007916374,0.00014855638,0.000025812058],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010024325,0.00053218234,0.028909313,0.0000310129,0.0020128402,0.00009216287,0.030739762,0.000044522432,0.0005298636,0.06352424,0.8347923,0.037789375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096308306,0.0005235407,0.003211953,0.000098306664,0.00007733832,0.000005744075,0.020774527,9.020043e-7,0.000016479607,0.0049935337,0.9691729,0.00016169004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009732187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016136764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14013274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003007787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002054091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4493444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3000357133","doi":"10.1086/704740","title":"Advisors to Elites","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Courts","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Legal advice; Politics; Public relations; Political science; Set (abstract data type); Economic Justice; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.03423613159496956,"score_gpt":0.30169989213797777,"score_spread":0.2674637605430082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3000357133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49202472,0.002825312,0.00030307609,0.13538882,0.00043617887,0.00008488975,0.0000037058153,0.000016004837,0.36891732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921403,0.00025871006,0.00012141901,0.0067827892,0.0006544336,2.725637e-7,2.9776356e-8,0.0000010684859,0.000041005067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995632,0.000020750354,0.00010531663,0.000037596506,0.00019546165,0.00007763158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996567,0.000036255664,0.000045487275,0.000011110544,0.000092153416,0.00015832754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012946212,0.000030211937,0.00008984007,0.000009972216,0.0002453872,0.00002778981,0.000059197966,0.00001551259,0.000038523278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009633166,0.000023307026,0.000031497446,0.000048518472,0.00012647253,0.000084097876,0.000017018743,0.0000484194,0.000009670924],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033670807,0.0000138532,0.0013897157,0.0000019509866,0.000024393823,0.000023893283,0.010816439,0.000007813062,0.000106621366,0.98001164,0.0039249198,0.0036451067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010425329,0.00010511382,0.0015844988,0.00001946729,0.00001440804,0.0000034380114,0.00216555,8.2753945e-7,0.000027968103,0.024948899,0.97097665,0.000048952505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003253396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001492382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9670517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008961817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006222012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18873447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003053514","doi":"10.1093/icon/moz061","title":"Enforcing constitutional conventions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Law; Normative; Power (physics); Political science; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.021840513729224884,"score_gpt":0.31999423877296934,"score_spread":0.29815372504374443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003053514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014732747,0.0007190064,0.012391333,0.0073623382,0.010399013,0.00021688324,0.00008659502,0.000044545646,0.95404756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957298,0.00015653229,0.00070243864,0.0012530048,0.0014710436,0.0000040101263,0.000014935208,0.0000031912346,0.0006650223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973642,0.00009407415,0.0006174108,0.00015785314,0.0015142921,0.00025214962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99710107,0.0003052866,0.0003893309,0.00007927087,0.0019620804,0.000162938],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007883714,0.0001373737,0.00025164994,0.00019967546,0.00056602835,0.0001305623,0.0005693091,0.00009504183,0.0024203446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000324973,0.00013064491,0.00029493147,0.00016684273,0.007131083,0.0008407578,0.00007622376,0.00025799498,0.00046646481],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007519069,0.00009209521,0.0067535937,0.0000019218257,0.0002731092,0.0000561843,0.00018391924,0.0004022826,0.00019148999,0.99062634,0.0010140094,0.00032988016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009645408,0.000038845574,0.00069963996,0.00014702296,0.000037107115,0.00021969173,0.0006117329,0.000010130629,0.00010864053,0.11817775,0.8788072,0.00017772548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049550546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016956922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9809971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036970744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002182442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003533152","doi":"","title":"Seven Conceptions of Federalism Guiding Canada’s Constitutional Change Process — How Do They Work, and Why So Many?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Work (physics); Process (computing); Political science; Work in process; Law; Computer science; Engineering; Operations management; Politics; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.07644061034517834,"score_gpt":0.29066818111192455,"score_spread":0.2142275707667462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003533152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52187943,0.010385997,0.005361644,0.10050601,0.0044999523,0.002890838,0.00071528525,0.00039511968,0.35336572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972047,0.00060471176,0.00022295119,0.000587881,0.0011494065,0.00007201707,0.000014656479,0.0000059047425,0.00013774485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834824,0.00011154484,0.00031105307,0.00036971047,0.00045641977,0.00040305755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998661,0.00018491589,0.00019895245,0.00014262111,0.00063894835,0.0001735523],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036630107,0.00021510095,0.00034197705,0.00009084552,0.003144134,0.00016035806,0.0002593872,0.000111604626,0.00009379966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043097956,0.00020937424,0.00007503031,0.00031505822,0.010447509,0.00037497326,0.00010053506,0.00010697204,0.000007057404],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017975826,0.000039825474,0.011938185,0.000028620114,0.0000829048,0.0000092173195,0.0053667105,0.000012212777,0.000037503833,0.980041,0.0016461095,0.0007797208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011362084,0.000098635755,0.012085872,0.0013569081,0.00023891023,0.0000671299,0.037676457,0.000028001163,0.00020934276,0.041053966,0.90490305,0.0011455286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15159851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.56850773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9389871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022395192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00278531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005174135","doi":"10.1145/3375627.3375848","title":"Towards Just, Fair and Interpretable Methods for Judicial Subset Selection","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Representativeness heuristic; Supreme court; Selection (genetic algorithm); Computer science; Economic Justice; Order (exchange); Process (computing); Law; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Statistics; Economics","score_opus":0.15690525602395852,"score_gpt":0.42214671508154156,"score_spread":0.265241459057583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005174135","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18100375,0.0011199503,0.013738514,0.6992328,0.000969654,0.00208664,0.0001013906,0.00023983022,0.10150743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98731637,0.0016574585,0.0050554294,0.0056423726,0.00022292456,0.00002562147,5.663541e-7,0.0000055736427,0.00007367456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990645,0.000043417847,0.00016907747,0.00024981913,0.00026768443,0.00020552006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987788,0.0002849256,0.00012410172,0.00003315289,0.00068873045,0.00009029414],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015994025,0.000115972325,0.00022633934,0.000010490956,0.001439028,0.00011855539,0.00027318008,0.00020772473,0.000011980328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027343717,0.00008843823,0.00011765487,0.00021245606,0.00082829566,0.00015107782,0.000215907,0.0005550872,4.7558572e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042417825,0.000015776652,0.0011633144,0.000079063975,0.000057914505,1.0304471e-8,0.061226357,4.2366142e-7,0.0022540644,0.9272421,0.003149599,0.0047689807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00090279133,0.00055837573,0.004071963,0.00033702477,0.00027249,0.000001444138,0.08985574,0.00544583,0.0048990324,0.8193495,0.0737274,0.0005784007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00086516596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007377582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8063126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003232343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000332362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006318875","doi":"","title":"Immuring Dicey’s Ghost: The Senate Reform Reference and Constitutional Conventions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CentAUR (University of Reading)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitution; Law; Metaphor; Political science; Constitutional law; Constitutional court; Architecture; Sociology; Philosophy; History; Linguistics","score_opus":0.039093682669905566,"score_gpt":0.24071363434391796,"score_spread":0.2016199516740124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006318875","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49121284,0.0008074811,0.0019811275,0.04814887,0.00027414772,0.00030172014,0.00008125029,0.00010499908,0.45708755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989118,0.0005316831,0.00005898407,0.00016554636,0.000046704303,1.3579842e-7,0.000004739454,9.281506e-7,0.00027947925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994982,0.00003377311,0.000056093468,0.00011611719,0.00017123671,0.00012457723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970883,0.00003428526,0.000057962014,0.000041413394,0.0000752668,0.000082253944],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012333097,0.000048683592,0.000090949594,0.000018976838,0.0014959307,0.000014055484,0.00014772432,0.000033658245,0.00010846583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038706534,0.00004501739,0.000039440503,0.0001473639,0.0042151883,0.00015782348,0.00011234941,0.000086900814,0.000026852837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014734376,0.000009126279,0.002233261,0.0000054184616,0.000030915697,0.000004246897,0.0047777044,8.79849e-7,0.00016103966,0.99177325,0.00036517193,0.0006242372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012502285,0.000084004714,0.05657368,0.00022582363,0.00021259279,0.000008532237,0.27995312,0.00007667255,0.0001815648,0.018475585,0.64250267,0.0004555622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044435607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00062644744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97329766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007461839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011586803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3007465312","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-35085-7_2","title":"The Supreme Court of the United States and Judicial Activism in the Trump Era","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Ninth; Law; Political science; Administration (probate law); Politics; Economic Justice; Certiorari; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.035743086013432374,"score_gpt":0.2674931164329036,"score_spread":0.2317500304194712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3007465312","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029824434,0.00062077737,0.000004297338,0.07212838,0.0002399342,0.00039178348,0.000033423283,0.000015708458,0.92358327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96801466,0.0068506384,0.000004249371,0.0032006921,0.00052670576,0.000013495273,0.000008355637,0.000010128243,0.0213711],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890417,0.00010404036,0.00018944491,0.00014049264,0.00050815946,0.00015368512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905294,0.0006231105,0.00011310467,0.00010352459,0.00008068482,0.000026607984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043929176,0.00012793753,0.00018500329,0.000027109074,0.0011030186,0.000051706906,0.00039314522,0.00009561485,0.000055203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012198101,0.000056067584,0.00007750447,0.00011123893,0.0021698067,0.00003402172,0.0001258117,0.00031952834,0.0000065993795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016013539,0.0000052099635,0.00018569115,0.0000017952623,0.000043822783,0.0000013069318,0.004233503,0.0000011906728,0.0000011937908,0.99053574,0.0038838286,0.0010907133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008195541,0.000019740048,0.0023631423,0.000034658195,0.000033764794,3.6021368e-7,0.004629636,0.000005360435,0.0000024810586,0.38260162,0.61014146,0.00008582529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020203551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044695243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9650322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003389733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022722023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.986321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3007712709","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-35085-7_5","title":"‘Principled Judicial Activism’ in Defense of Our Common Humanity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Parliament; Political science; Law; Humanity; Interpretation (philosophy); State (computer science); Context (archaeology); Meaning (existential); Rule of law; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Politics; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.07842353535616152,"score_gpt":0.31667543846105733,"score_spread":0.2382519031048958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3007712709","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00054964575,0.0002343664,0.000008423762,0.0017071095,0.00026938063,0.00024962047,0.000020062322,0.000048183687,0.9969132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9610917,0.00034379246,0.000022156966,0.00031096872,0.0006399754,0.0000053258755,0.000006841687,0.000011027163,0.03756822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871516,0.00004574735,0.0003287975,0.00023537617,0.000488662,0.000186267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947435,0.00007513379,0.00018208536,0.00009330422,0.00009820767,0.00007689812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024234784,0.0001764967,0.0005102155,0.0000807976,0.00031390696,0.0000143854295,0.00022626274,0.00022039546,0.000270724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000100002144,0.00017341763,0.0001540555,0.00006673515,0.00041578425,0.000055113458,0.00015324546,0.00031554862,0.00011906688],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033183653,0.00002199576,0.0003484334,0.000006423704,0.00004361655,0.000017825125,0.0011206152,7.1568013e-7,0.00000386758,0.99648935,0.0008052733,0.0011087074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028822766,0.000065818866,0.0012306657,0.00012855514,0.000064829415,4.0179148e-7,0.0018875169,0.0000012094711,0.0000136948265,0.70946324,0.28648663,0.0003692252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01844155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12276137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.960542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014488913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003779454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98809475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3007999426","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2019.32","title":"<i>The Coxford Lecture</i> Seek the Good: Professional Trust, Justice, and the Rule of Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Economic Justice; Rule of law; Admiration; Function (biology); Legal education; Due process; Constitution; Sociology; Political science; Common law; Psychology; Municipal law; Social psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.02041028390006334,"score_gpt":0.278402052167158,"score_spread":0.2579917682670947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3007999426","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0603155,0.040725574,0.00033177,0.5876956,0.0033296,0.00077812636,0.00008602039,0.000015739963,0.30672207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99015564,0.00061432517,0.000032600867,0.008398107,0.00065498264,0.0000039083106,1.8750482e-7,0.0000039089673,0.00013632215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866456,0.00022784353,0.0002974646,0.0000902919,0.00043794114,0.00028187307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841416,0.0006751705,0.00023799579,0.00007871782,0.0002676377,0.00032629393],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000989129,0.00009091329,0.0001879964,0.000011167783,0.0033915068,0.00010778815,0.00058633887,0.000049936356,0.000029336345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004176701,0.000043256296,0.00009264932,0.00018298604,0.0051346933,0.00013540279,0.00003700061,0.00033811462,0.0000040820514],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005199135,0.000003547824,0.00034845268,0.0000068087966,0.00003790149,0.00001590539,0.008775289,0.00001853255,0.0000073171063,0.98765326,0.002439511,0.0006414894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036070702,0.00004976358,0.0011470709,0.00007191227,0.00013715317,0.000020555015,0.003639043,0.00001203814,0.00003283458,0.061030615,0.9334131,0.000085236694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045139343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22490531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93097353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004794698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016534574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99790597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008073078","doi":"10.1017/s0008423920000086","title":"Seeking the Court's Advice: The Politics of the Canadian Reference Power Kate Puddister, Vancouver: UBC Press, 2019, pp. 290.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Politics; Political science; Power (physics); Law; Public administration; Computer science; Physics","score_opus":0.03245609222274947,"score_gpt":0.27931230527815626,"score_spread":0.24685621305540678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008073078","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.076510124,0.0035420728,0.000056219207,0.4799439,0.004583544,0.00059798284,0.00040489988,0.00001927333,0.43434197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99195075,0.00002722633,0.000019211195,0.0072889207,0.0004555416,0.0000013532164,1.5729657e-7,0.000004147914,0.0002526766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99709225,0.00018512008,0.0003657432,0.00016415614,0.0009704235,0.0012222839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99655575,0.00024759411,0.0001930788,0.00019525026,0.000748848,0.0020594776],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013556305,0.00011911061,0.00018319511,0.000045247558,0.0044243233,0.00023642616,0.0019599202,0.00006576591,0.0001228425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002574336,0.000061774226,0.0001113852,0.0006837393,0.008644409,0.000267987,0.00008314648,0.00046381276,0.000010529271],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016901195,0.0000034614125,0.003556604,0.0000018371375,0.000011414774,0.000011916223,0.002732325,0.0000127455405,0.000010480663,0.97005785,0.023515884,0.000083813786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017079478,0.00008120851,0.12106199,0.00010016234,0.00007387246,0.000022496164,0.013882921,0.00006789598,0.00006159234,0.043125015,0.82111806,0.00023397211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9474111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9825948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9269328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081271416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019495338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99687177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009029119","doi":"10.1093/cjcl/cxaa002","title":"Dare to Diverge: Time for Administrative Law in Hong Kong to Stand on Its Own Two Feet","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"City University of Hong Kong","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Economic Justice; Tribunal; Certainty; Political science; Administrative law; English law; Legal certainty","score_opus":0.07601680687163821,"score_gpt":0.4085948325334373,"score_spread":0.3325780256617991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009029119","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84192264,0.00020811484,0.00004556409,0.007416055,0.00031611553,0.00057813333,0.00004497388,0.0000059264485,0.14946249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99777806,0.000008285611,0.000057539928,0.0010535702,0.00039643096,0.000009093694,7.9463666e-7,0.000003862036,0.00069234724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987532,0.00018913108,0.00028578515,0.00012199272,0.0004296841,0.00022018762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986811,0.0005805931,0.00015816989,0.00007379069,0.00038093788,0.00012539196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068261044,0.00014116518,0.00040409615,0.000048006066,0.00054929557,0.0000686148,0.00033442475,0.000025128691,0.00010155229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000083287734,0.00007882569,0.00009538985,0.00034301396,0.00023803223,0.00021976681,0.00005991908,0.00016068417,0.00014643667],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00087030313,0.000100467034,0.0017194021,0.0000039060023,0.00008188518,0.0000062281497,0.022549618,0.0015695128,0.00055127055,0.9707283,0.0017716009,0.000047499805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0077784527,0.0068586715,0.15287988,0.0017952988,0.00015757175,0.000019989908,0.03523956,0.00017609798,0.0037251455,0.4614252,0.32834932,0.0015948159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003561085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008611098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5093031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000124632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016615444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48051947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010910867","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Reconciliation and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.018190510594717966,"score_gpt":0.2363692416486264,"score_spread":0.21817873105390845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010910867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35062155,0.0050731814,0.0003235836,0.011603458,0.001148307,0.0012036967,0.00009605016,0.000051336923,0.6298788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99894404,0.00038501888,0.00010132575,0.0001820733,0.00017217941,0.000017756267,0.000006325834,0.0000013641505,0.00018992269],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990968,0.000096874974,0.00022106932,0.00019450145,0.00019557419,0.00019514802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992389,0.00027356792,0.00009215216,0.00009524031,0.00018731177,0.00011283764],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057196635,0.000101986436,0.0002194183,0.00005787094,0.0014475932,0.000058668036,0.00010636039,0.00008927365,0.00013215379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019059192,0.00007582117,0.000048964914,0.00014093288,0.010425387,0.00017910724,0.000033727883,0.000096771466,0.00003488737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019892886,0.00000864798,0.012832677,0.000009305797,0.00004322081,0.0000013538956,0.0015641,0.0000126542955,0.000015307112,0.9850957,0.000086214604,0.00031094052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040349034,0.00006370768,0.023575576,0.00047746132,0.00019210296,0.000069887436,0.006268987,0.00034537935,0.00005105833,0.34475142,0.6195277,0.0006418128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23257208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5340602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64832246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000103250575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068781775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011230888","doi":"","title":"Strengthening the Parliamentary Scrutiny of Delegated Legislation: Lessons From Australia","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Parliament; Legislation; Legislature; Public administration; Political science; Law; Government (linguistics); Cabinet (room); House of Representatives; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.03239378356906666,"score_gpt":0.31223809367539535,"score_spread":0.2798443101063287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011230888","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9811161,0.0016167099,0.00027717193,0.008986309,0.00042331187,0.00012500102,0.000009313227,0.000015766529,0.007430303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970587,0.0013803402,0.00003258536,0.000063580286,0.0004541897,0.0000017838291,0.0000033353845,0.0000036488816,0.0010018554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831986,0.00013499326,0.00022282398,0.000104837476,0.0003810638,0.00083640224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950135,0.00012218984,0.00017262727,0.00007383688,0.000093577284,0.00003639859],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010383416,0.000077102915,0.00012751829,0.000027660666,0.00069809105,0.00003755215,0.00025971097,0.000044679855,0.00029272068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051097217,0.000048857226,0.00008559581,0.00018006659,0.00026312025,0.0001675414,0.000027562519,0.00062915595,0.000050497143],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029977604,0.000028834704,0.04317185,4.5853895e-7,0.00025336692,6.398323e-7,0.0023346348,0.00006871288,0.0002392206,0.9415036,0.00020297144,0.012165754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005870437,0.000118749354,0.018961065,0.000056640794,0.000100144374,0.00000879568,0.06969904,0.000019783109,0.00012877348,0.86437696,0.045741394,0.00020160023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034075405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04582741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.077126615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003108076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013494832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9723568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011431422","doi":"","title":"CSPG conference – Parliament and the Courts","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Institution; Law; Action (physics); Politics","score_opus":0.026130848001393134,"score_gpt":0.27257575376200616,"score_spread":0.246444905760613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011431422","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01389983,0.41070032,0.0000047744,0.17886293,0.0010677034,0.0023015144,0.000050525778,0.000029970983,0.39308244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7384813,0.22822529,0.000014342793,0.031912472,0.00011402147,0.00006509357,0.0000065354393,0.0000037818772,0.0011771444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904025,0.00015340214,0.00015310569,0.0001634293,0.00020871582,0.00028108677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994494,0.0000784464,0.000048097718,0.00012606118,0.000052570213,0.00024544753],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006168135,0.00009114556,0.00023511644,0.000018672092,0.0005301721,0.00004826915,0.00017577625,0.000024523819,0.0020600907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004621661,0.00006213811,0.000052629995,0.00009873468,0.00072186947,0.00008599623,0.000027047148,0.00008087423,0.0003581366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008419155,0.000008807329,0.013441468,0.00013886171,0.00008579878,0.000010841981,0.0013648063,3.0606242e-7,6.5275105e-7,0.8336434,0.10789975,0.043396924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002150322,0.000008202425,0.0010210836,0.00059144205,0.000045568213,0.0000018365188,0.0012440553,0.0000014622409,2.6796877e-7,0.005917613,0.99085325,0.00010020988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.62581605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6818159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88295346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017156747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006566224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99885213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011541903","doi":"10.29173/alr2595","title":"The Supreme Court, Functional Bilingualism, and the Indigenous Candidate: Reconciling the Bench","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Supreme court; Viewpoints; Representation (politics); Diversity (politics); Neuroscience of multilingualism; Law; Political science; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.0399132814501872,"score_gpt":0.2881896733746585,"score_spread":0.24827639192447132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011541903","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006982093,0.46246165,0.000008568026,0.42311174,0.0005004271,0.0011832339,0.000008206037,0.000025347117,0.10571872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7049396,0.25269073,0.0000038603557,0.04102901,0.00075556844,0.000088207664,0.0000050705517,0.0000059527433,0.00048199715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998724,0.00034574076,0.00023135834,0.00016283612,0.0003167007,0.00021938518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99776983,0.0018502307,0.00009067068,0.00012309762,0.00010104954,0.00006511388],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013649444,0.00009577488,0.00019746102,0.0000023931266,0.0041588736,0.00009696166,0.00028152324,0.000028929346,0.00006977818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010892123,0.00003964984,0.00009054197,0.0002008416,0.0017640144,0.00006605793,0.000085674794,0.00015735958,0.00004287641],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000146569755,0.0000041028575,0.00032371943,0.000031300668,0.0000670051,8.148826e-7,0.006982707,9.212492e-7,4.724716e-7,0.9817709,0.0044354745,0.006367942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012134338,0.000008587801,0.00013864892,0.000109440436,0.00008911751,0.0000031773793,0.00080446835,0.000003764884,9.084394e-7,0.00662921,0.9920217,0.000069651906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09591798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17908259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9875862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025329213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024486825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013950883","doi":"","title":"A Reply to Professor Pothier's Review of Power Without Law: TheSupreme Court of Canada, the Marshall Decisions and theFailure of Judicial Activism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Judicial activism; Power (physics); Judicial review; Judicial opinion","score_opus":0.01866275446483642,"score_gpt":0.2886034032387778,"score_spread":0.2699406487739414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013950883","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4478417,0.009174291,0.00007570244,0.16777539,0.0019549523,0.0014080834,0.00023541444,0.000021500839,0.37151295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940564,0.0016215664,0.0002358662,0.003784514,0.00020713109,0.0000059552935,3.7456786e-7,0.000006675814,0.000081513965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824655,0.0001751853,0.0004395114,0.00012271327,0.0007778316,0.0002382257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984109,0.0003395827,0.00038889897,0.0001715387,0.00055220997,0.00013691654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016935995,0.00010540262,0.00037466706,0.000020708498,0.0009878748,0.000017712346,0.00036143465,0.000055537133,0.0001381529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008390439,0.000065625194,0.00008889521,0.00017735855,0.0010504802,0.00010319578,0.0001048283,0.00035996872,7.383808e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001018684,0.00009479604,0.0018287755,0.000058718015,0.00016155587,0.000009565937,0.005412666,0.0000011727701,0.0008222494,0.974652,0.014965807,0.00189084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047551777,0.00018209276,0.018769294,0.0033457184,0.0001941941,0.00006913356,0.005209129,8.784545e-7,0.00049104984,0.063083984,0.9079075,0.00027151153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40768433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88595265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.911568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029068786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010231314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7598034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014012931","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-38419-7_13","title":"Roadblocks and Roadmaps to Multinational Federalism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Multinational corporation; Federalism; Political science; Politics; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.03739900469730027,"score_gpt":0.28409815205892636,"score_spread":0.24669914736162607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014012931","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000013865522,0.0003597933,0.00005618874,0.032857977,0.00021061397,0.00020788022,0.00002722878,0.00006600519,0.9662005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07031488,0.00031008341,0.00047890298,0.006152309,0.0014907138,0.000013434168,0.000015983507,0.0000121089615,0.9212116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905723,0.000010430803,0.0001380314,0.00025339113,0.00040798687,0.00013293701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955446,0.000061482126,0.00004139513,0.000039641287,0.00012778319,0.0001752174],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000096930875,0.00013603565,0.00018717142,0.00004115945,0.0007898759,0.00006911874,0.00010283121,0.00013259354,0.0009815805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009797325,0.00012717159,0.00005665325,0.000024574409,0.00031205316,0.00004425197,0.00012233856,0.00011871975,0.0003688805],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003796247,0.0000025515583,0.000025675008,0.0000013591012,0.000028481289,0.000004910988,0.0008047785,3.838567e-7,9.975099e-7,0.97457176,0.019939054,0.004616238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052921278,0.000012545371,0.00016965263,0.000019154077,0.000011649105,4.432753e-7,0.00022381652,7.654697e-7,6.531318e-7,0.1660048,0.83335,0.00015357879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030720779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00607414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81341094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006012629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017320529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014605346","doi":"","title":"Historical Society Program: Illustrious Alumni of St. John's University School of Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Economic Justice; State (computer science); Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.01981483312032384,"score_gpt":0.25640884506044287,"score_spread":0.23659401194011903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014605346","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39781523,0.0015078092,0.000031901604,0.0019052023,0.00094295485,0.00083538773,0.000058724578,0.00017416936,0.5967286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940167,0.00020821064,0.00068148837,0.00018094813,0.00021321734,0.0000033769038,0.000003498598,0.000005933191,0.0046866164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985461,0.000107196836,0.0002333173,0.0002436018,0.0005642909,0.00030545561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909717,0.00008930995,0.0001650482,0.00017662457,0.00027894802,0.00019288094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036573384,0.00011827376,0.00033264057,0.000022718077,0.0004981027,0.000017419376,0.00033477982,0.00015530169,0.0005488112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000891311,0.00011913078,0.0002542727,0.00033507592,0.0010159679,0.0002383041,0.00012732208,0.00022031803,0.00012539519],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004454099,0.00023219848,0.021970412,0.000027555847,0.00011046495,0.000004763766,0.0006678503,0.000010977856,0.00016312789,0.9635083,0.0124721,0.0007877203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000466679,0.00011870015,0.0033744157,0.00003989213,0.000043669894,4.0809343e-7,0.0017573208,0.0000023944178,0.00006940997,0.0045934045,0.98937297,0.00016071428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10249408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010838557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9769009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006069895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043892345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9034825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016979700","doi":"10.1017/9781108596268.005","title":"Proportionality Analysis by the Canadian Supreme Court","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Supreme court; Doctrine; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03723745045924074,"score_gpt":0.2288822759907654,"score_spread":0.19164482553152468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016979700","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000024594268,0.00022790486,0.000052573363,0.0029777251,0.00012820667,0.00033132554,0.001063314,0.00005775238,0.9951366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08822887,0.00009674547,0.000005120066,0.00045672018,0.00023103497,0.0000010021814,0.00012012238,0.000007684612,0.91085273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985859,0.000074796044,0.00014103451,0.00034664824,0.00058148976,0.00027015398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989921,0.0000576649,0.00014366879,0.00018911707,0.00029037514,0.00032710176],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022162548,0.00019182675,0.00030231886,0.000090038455,0.0025425265,0.0000762972,0.00052733626,0.000227687,0.000036947382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032952208,0.00018020271,0.0003009567,0.00004246504,0.0016602158,0.00005280367,0.00013176021,0.0003389166,0.00002614087],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009090642,0.000002307544,0.00007810926,0.0000026955415,0.00068845367,0.000040774106,0.0001518737,0.0000010379566,3.4250667e-7,0.86392415,0.13498999,0.00011119676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006637269,0.0000064550795,0.0002093487,0.000009547145,0.000976746,3.9262e-7,0.00020630879,0.0000041299877,0.0000017617072,0.00024544026,0.9980568,0.00021663865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.70247036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4468656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8636787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006936991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013992961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99875605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3018787836","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3583497","title":"Legislated Rights in the Anglo-American Tradition","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.019757032116971485,"score_gpt":0.26909434015585876,"score_spread":0.24933730803888726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3018787836","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73093104,0.0023210684,0.0009597003,0.11990059,0.00019067118,0.00023696579,0.0000031036673,0.00005422288,0.14540263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99754196,0.00072818925,0.0000066668376,0.0009607165,0.00072522106,0.0000030610856,9.1310613e-7,0.0000016349422,0.000031649324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849904,0.000202283,0.00011915736,0.00008516924,0.00029447567,0.0007998785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997833,0.00004839403,0.00006386709,0.000026674506,0.000032443088,0.00004533691],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008744729,0.0000570492,0.000090424306,0.000025133395,0.00079790386,0.000043362874,0.00021757763,0.000020645179,0.000017373926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006614533,0.00003801222,0.000053209682,0.00046741302,0.00032302918,0.00012678474,0.0000063072443,0.00072064874,0.000025487443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013103428,0.00001866825,0.0007418459,1.4719126e-7,0.00002022449,0.0000056828303,0.0041555907,0.000004133042,0.000008602716,0.991303,0.00023698482,0.0034920156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020985265,0.00016589185,0.003476132,0.0000049520227,0.000014114361,0.000019026118,0.026433548,0.000008252526,0.0000024980009,0.8987693,0.07080788,0.00008853931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010378861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04006644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2666109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002943117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011180507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3024113687","doi":"10.53386/nilq.v63i3.396","title":"Law and the practice of politics in the Canadian Department of Justice: completing confederation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"U.S. Department of State","keywords":"Politics; Economic Justice; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Corporate governance; Commercial law; Legal research; Sociology; Public administration; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.02107786360967136,"score_gpt":0.28048742961075057,"score_spread":0.25940956600107923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3024113687","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43921635,0.0005419946,0.000057354566,0.10652743,0.000115201394,0.00052907976,0.000044494154,0.000008514785,0.4529596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972123,0.000009212485,0.000014714773,0.0026201212,0.00012857761,0.0000058688615,0.0000028626885,0.0000014098284,0.000004925916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992119,0.00024268328,0.000156436,0.0000626487,0.0002117743,0.00011455208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934727,0.00039583907,0.00007775873,0.000035844903,0.000100695346,0.000042570926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045841894,0.00004307591,0.00010025842,0.00000850649,0.0006819467,0.000049818882,0.00008169759,0.000025524056,0.000004669534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015644131,0.00002589414,0.00002117009,0.00005601498,0.00063094235,0.000074344345,0.0000039494616,0.000084422034,0.0000021033113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024357016,0.000011214662,0.0032578588,0.0000055227133,0.00001365322,0.000003120602,0.050070193,0.0000053695503,0.0000014482503,0.9462682,0.000028468106,0.0003106025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025911776,0.00060333987,0.01846897,0.000059945214,0.00035098012,0.00000993892,0.33630624,0.0002892603,0.000008093105,0.021689413,0.6193627,0.00025989604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8204199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96376044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9245788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024755986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021680258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52450514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3025461587","doi":"10.4324/9780429056550-3","title":"Good faith in the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Faith; Political science; Good faith; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.03236369498988826,"score_gpt":0.24194383958834198,"score_spread":0.20958014459845373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3025461587","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000015256778,0.0003181143,0.0000027023054,0.018027488,0.00012622085,0.00012238696,0.000028715423,0.0000060037623,0.9813531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7701094,0.0002826455,0.000012547347,0.002181628,0.00040406617,0.0000047232475,0.000004964537,0.000004908338,0.2269951],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991361,0.000017361592,0.00013377072,0.000098244825,0.0005080064,0.000106537474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997156,0.00009847213,0.000052031843,0.000050768824,0.00005367832,0.000029427662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015293037,0.00007617932,0.00016184598,0.000012187807,0.00018608297,0.000007682046,0.00022322449,0.00005728936,0.00043826984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004111964,0.00005033193,0.00004005622,0.00003248258,0.00031966006,0.000016348773,0.00003268404,0.000120590485,0.0000085358015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017018756,0.0000021402607,0.000116943585,0.0000019526256,0.000016635111,0.000008017548,0.00071043905,3.8226003e-7,1.4049871e-7,0.9743175,0.024672864,0.00015128637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032246608,0.000008075151,0.00037241192,0.00002018773,0.000010989552,1.5222228e-7,0.0019261043,2.1254588e-7,5.4077236e-7,0.10313747,0.89441997,0.000071659844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92015207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9956927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87118006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000854086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016474475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47987473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3027520552","doi":"","title":"Introduction: Canada's Chief Justice: Beverley McLachlin's Legacy of Law and Leadership","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.038305935165946,"score_gpt":0.273524511760051,"score_spread":0.235218576594105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3027520552","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.074340396,0.0031001936,0.00003664779,0.05543987,0.0049172537,0.00033310286,0.000038730876,0.000105013845,0.8616888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98510283,0.000068503134,0.00012209889,0.0028179793,0.009641245,0.000006609288,0.0000032714354,0.0000057459233,0.0022317008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870104,0.00008891194,0.00019765664,0.00025316855,0.0004326682,0.00032657778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992971,0.00008017823,0.000076374636,0.00013686488,0.00023413604,0.00017535508],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031972068,0.00011265114,0.0001926843,0.000019458514,0.0014684635,0.000066947745,0.00016999846,0.000075501666,0.00047597563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025736296,0.000109184744,0.00003489696,0.00018502933,0.0024849628,0.00031622738,0.00005603373,0.00015169378,0.000047482557],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002039684,0.000020443687,0.0006314422,0.000015477865,0.000030865634,0.0000028427526,0.00065319403,0.0000012775879,0.0000429537,0.96692514,0.031301502,0.00035448314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019400418,0.00004942376,0.002645241,0.000023950735,0.000060357786,0.0000023387229,0.0048611574,9.677156e-7,0.00026918997,0.0069111376,0.9848256,0.00015664534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88954556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9740593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.960014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011985923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005770957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3029084391","doi":"10.1177/1473779520927715","title":"Through which glass darkly? Constitutional principle in legality and constitutionality review","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Principle of legality; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Statute; Constitution; Legitimacy; Adjudication; Common law; Interpretation (philosophy); Judicial review; Constitutional law; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10086855393848133,"score_gpt":0.38679863242556745,"score_spread":0.2859300784870861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3029084391","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006457165,0.48487028,0.000100061654,0.1314741,0.00014839243,0.00077168044,0.00004151498,0.00005687844,0.38247252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5610581,0.38955355,0.00010867972,0.048937704,0.00018125684,0.00007610196,0.00002449258,0.0000031828342,0.00005696036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976109,0.0005368277,0.00062795694,0.00039861625,0.0005181565,0.0003075232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908394,0.00021759131,0.00015893232,0.00016194796,0.00021929099,0.00015831855],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012917508,0.00019384202,0.0007181395,0.000014672496,0.0008462899,0.00004544945,0.00027786253,0.00004775611,0.00046269118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006789125,0.00017266299,0.00011008755,0.0010625477,0.00406471,0.0004050728,0.00019570367,0.0003070517,0.00008305644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000571285,0.000041435218,0.008928377,0.0017473772,0.000020056275,0.000009011573,0.00005013596,0.0000010053311,4.5612646e-7,0.98013973,0.008372864,0.00068386074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017890737,0.0000069249368,0.0019001551,0.009045941,0.00006029118,0.0000040579957,0.000016289612,0.0000018191538,9.199519e-7,0.019415453,0.969164,0.0002052313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034235078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031624265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9607912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012351226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063653913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99864566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033121196","doi":"","title":"The Conceptual Gap Between Doré and Vavilov","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Standard of review; Law and economics; Charter; Political science; Administrative law; Sovereignty; Legislature; Law; Context (archaeology); Proportionality (law); Judicial review; Sociology; Geography; Politics","score_opus":0.04910823979702551,"score_gpt":0.2896579413424439,"score_spread":0.24054970154541838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033121196","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22639535,0.009011497,0.0001690286,0.105838306,0.00069471134,0.0005198935,0.000077817116,0.0002597009,0.6570337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953423,0.0003210634,0.00003166533,0.0024969329,0.0013867335,0.000009622822,0.0000019016657,0.0000037512239,0.0004059987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990555,0.00010234644,0.0001309313,0.00017083163,0.00029256946,0.00024781234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993622,0.0002538809,0.000039270057,0.000062079765,0.00005918953,0.00022341099],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002506797,0.00008044739,0.00012785307,0.000004516185,0.0019890042,0.00011753463,0.00019983535,0.000052246447,0.00011521756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003230433,0.000058245354,0.00004264719,0.00013490823,0.0019297196,0.00012720337,0.00009777969,0.00015822478,0.00026138767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000076199954,0.0000035879282,0.011758209,0.0000010519869,0.000026320811,0.000002489064,0.0021486287,3.9791385e-7,0.000018264207,0.9788124,0.0054064956,0.0018145619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016193715,0.000033230473,0.005551128,0.000007782696,0.000018465824,1.8842478e-7,0.005913012,6.678487e-7,0.000034161938,0.029588189,0.95858324,0.000108002125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0079279905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059991414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95317674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025854406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000106769374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99931026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033268489","doi":"","title":"Adducing Social Science Evidence in Constitutional Cases","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Charter; Scholarship; Political science; Scientific evidence; Public relations; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05443690351123246,"score_gpt":0.3545228625799268,"score_spread":0.30008595906869434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033268489","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7429548,0.0077725984,0.0036826576,0.008927529,0.0018524382,0.0002856631,0.00000460342,0.00008497725,0.23443475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960097,0.0015817174,0.000024469402,0.000186414,0.0020018318,0.0000037357333,1.5453054e-7,0.0000022266736,0.00018975924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968497,0.00010418392,0.00020660307,0.00020392318,0.000712248,0.0019233159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992685,0.00014448338,0.00008935554,0.00004419259,0.0003753235,0.00007814396],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004436063,0.00008699413,0.0001226394,0.00017113196,0.0044131656,0.00010736313,0.00036894446,0.000045650926,0.000086742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015378152,0.00008109574,0.00005391368,0.00084919675,0.009382562,0.0006970973,0.00006296436,0.0006634171,0.00006701766],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002281245,0.000020790956,0.007938472,4.1007175e-7,0.0000103527545,0.000007665722,0.0014485914,7.6364296e-7,0.00012585928,0.9841272,0.0000620851,0.0062349937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036651333,0.00020230684,0.012457099,0.00012836876,0.000020967085,0.00029306897,0.023382353,0.0000055466153,0.00006967176,0.9479128,0.014867323,0.00029396443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003386803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026447156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25305492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022373504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018384488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033291601","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3423147","title":"How Much French Do They Speak Anyway? A Bilingualism Index for Supreme Court Justices, 1985-2013","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Collège Montmorency; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Neuroscience of multilingualism; Index (typography); Political science; Law; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015312804971488275,"score_gpt":0.2761749314092233,"score_spread":0.260862126437735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033291601","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87883216,0.023445873,0.004392985,0.038524337,0.003456073,0.0013924827,0.00004504599,0.00014404082,0.04976698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866453,0.006487701,0.000064701206,0.00016086684,0.0020342278,0.000014387008,0.000003761068,0.000014044051,0.0045750393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99652183,0.00012402901,0.00024510323,0.00028163946,0.00065138686,0.0021759924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896944,0.00018966824,0.00020662035,0.00012960203,0.00037186476,0.00013279394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023513471,0.00018640794,0.00027788721,0.00010317192,0.0012300386,0.0002782564,0.00046906876,0.0001403532,0.000079218196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031485021,0.00015297158,0.00019424106,0.00020686435,0.00025397178,0.0003446572,0.00005463105,0.0009121809,0.00005617782],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040923558,0.000065889966,0.00861915,0.0000074476766,0.00020335212,0.0000020340826,0.0027858538,0.000011589633,0.00011878238,0.97977,0.0010527465,0.0073222425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008072449,0.00023157813,0.0010268944,0.000037823178,0.00008223955,0.00003461754,0.029691398,0.000027526241,0.000012793652,0.82396775,0.14378725,0.00029289708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009988163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08836597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15580225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008068254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004262344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033340380","doi":"10.21991/cf29404","title":"The Toronto Municipal Election: Judicial Failure to Protect the Structure of the Canadian Constitution","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Constitution; Principle of legality; Law; Legislation; Supreme court; Political science; Judicial review; Legitimacy; Interpretation (philosophy); Subject (documents); Legislature; Democracy; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.017993900235984486,"score_gpt":0.2587652190297893,"score_spread":0.24077131879380478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033340380","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0136214,0.004229271,0.0062116506,0.65661925,0.008959641,0.006962697,0.0013877866,0.00032913793,0.30167916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917597,0.00007333763,0.000108319655,0.0068913824,0.0009539672,0.00009646001,0.000018281027,0.000007880803,0.00009068213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960889,0.00034338413,0.00069228886,0.00051869784,0.0012619082,0.0010948147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975486,0.00031651265,0.0002839435,0.00044335966,0.00085367303,0.00055392674],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000581485,0.00038053317,0.00036804614,0.00006207862,0.020736149,0.00027556246,0.0013853296,0.0002888569,0.00021482467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024624448,0.00022696193,0.000350507,0.001143327,0.020131774,0.0004929134,0.00033476477,0.00059921155,0.000077357734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077904384,0.000018289586,0.0035637415,0.000004913982,0.00012273,0.0000032874527,0.0011743557,0.0007144486,0.000301655,0.9770957,0.016311513,0.00061143405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049526145,0.00007240838,0.0011419697,0.00009135574,0.00010293425,0.00004304927,0.011254038,0.00006856983,0.00054642535,0.029130692,0.95665467,0.00039864072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30369437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95516723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97813827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011852282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010510576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034724416","doi":"","title":"Popping the Question: What the Questionnaire for Federal Judicial Appointments Reveals about the Pursuit of Justice, Diversity, and the Commitment to Transparency","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Transparency (behavior); Accountability; Government (linguistics); Economic Justice; Political science; Politics; Law; Legislation; Diversity (politics); Public administration","score_opus":0.04443449321709542,"score_gpt":0.30674537207155084,"score_spread":0.2623108788544554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034724416","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08764761,0.0145162055,0.0024875333,0.87368214,0.0021660693,0.0045698276,0.00007309899,0.00009426578,0.014763262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811871,0.0010305655,0.000033833356,0.016511373,0.000987063,0.00013919716,0.0000019655697,0.000004628248,0.000104270584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982171,0.00043632888,0.00025362545,0.00020548004,0.00062994985,0.00025749495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899,0.00046907485,0.00012019039,0.00015045493,0.00016220071,0.00010806053],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015651316,0.00013086331,0.00021282853,0.000008801043,0.010060177,0.00032044773,0.00073961186,0.000049255857,0.000022781338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004531964,0.00006159276,0.00011920242,0.00021477044,0.0016212671,0.00024402486,0.00042287662,0.000176586,0.0000126214345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015642002,0.000023296221,0.003113793,0.000017922834,0.00009635428,7.608223e-7,0.020273944,0.0000419711,0.000006103741,0.96954507,0.0044252994,0.002299088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004172782,0.00055218,0.111244686,0.001123284,0.0015162536,0.000005151159,0.09936137,0.00009973611,0.00005341266,0.4736577,0.30748388,0.0007295619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011796955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012748771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8935395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060303657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000086412605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035318609","doi":"10.1515/journal-2019-0052","title":"Judicial Review (Departmentalism) vs Supremacy: The Connection to a 17th Century Debate and a Dilemma for Today","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ICL Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Supreme court; Judicial review; Law; Legislature; State (computer science); Separation of powers; Sovereignty; Unitary state; Political science; Dilemma; Power (physics); Judicial activism; Interpretation (philosophy); Supremacy Clause; Enumerated powers; Judicial interpretation; Law and economics; Federalism; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics; Epistemology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0444017283513609,"score_gpt":0.32340335831165345,"score_spread":0.27900162996029254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035318609","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19106428,0.043703996,0.0012727529,0.74804074,0.0020810408,0.002100222,0.00007891244,0.0000834265,0.011574626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9617102,0.014749891,0.00007111323,0.021492071,0.0019200392,0.000032218293,0.0000015928258,0.0000045140896,0.000018349396],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912316,0.000111361354,0.00017777152,0.000117084724,0.00026226143,0.00020837918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949336,0.00010311254,0.000076389486,0.00003091431,0.00011561156,0.00018061609],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050658046,0.000074595955,0.00015571162,0.000013558793,0.0015475072,0.00009802092,0.00012189477,0.000023451874,0.00008898248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047732194,0.00004982873,0.00007987984,0.00015960581,0.00016298855,0.000118667675,0.000045240165,0.00010391164,0.00001711485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00091418973,0.00015656104,0.009375807,0.00018792883,0.00051519723,0.00008551895,0.03539377,0.000020445344,0.00060974975,0.40211278,0.42004824,0.13057981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002999932,0.00013238168,0.0017547625,0.00020201191,0.00008194587,0.00002847349,0.0013474262,0.0000057676552,0.000019037472,0.0074337837,0.9885929,0.00010146484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005390022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007660976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7706459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054595454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012516168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035846376","doi":"","title":"American Rights Jurisprudence Through Canadian Eyes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Scrutiny; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Bill of rights; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02427279767133124,"score_gpt":0.28624834494148926,"score_spread":0.26197554727015804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035846376","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09407653,0.0010542796,0.00009299216,0.06017302,0.0005621203,0.00026909905,0.00005072232,0.00020692156,0.8435143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867932,0.0001329014,0.00035183955,0.011299804,0.0010447472,0.000015186429,0.0000030930328,0.000005380524,0.0003538437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986436,0.00008727589,0.00015159507,0.00027545635,0.0003832442,0.0004588663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911016,0.000061005365,0.00005519975,0.00009976985,0.00009260387,0.00058124954],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000117923686,0.00011919088,0.00019159434,0.000016475546,0.0018733705,0.00010189667,0.0003441053,0.000050714516,0.0007848995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016634265,0.000109989254,0.00007100573,0.0004483544,0.0013651788,0.0003019651,0.000045749657,0.00017781505,0.0017558655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058159426,0.000009133887,0.0046669333,0.0000015327871,0.000022632463,0.000027068772,0.002866311,0.000004035843,0.000013775379,0.9810475,0.010881442,0.0004538214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074477684,0.000031539214,0.0032825805,0.000011571151,0.000011989947,3.6799676e-7,0.0014743843,0.000001502788,0.000051472,0.035980213,0.95890445,0.00017545954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9572538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96267784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.948023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015354683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056424865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99942607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037170927","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2020.1782948","title":"Diverse and inclusive high courts: a global and intersectional perspective","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Groups and Identities","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Intersectionality; Perspective (graphical); Privilege (computing); Gender studies; Diversity (politics); Race (biology); Disadvantage; Context (archaeology); Representation (politics); Sociology; Political science; Law; Politics; Geography; Anthropology","score_opus":0.017982904699169387,"score_gpt":0.28876736899116867,"score_spread":0.27078446429199926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037170927","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9476068,0.0022536945,0.00007426657,0.0106749395,0.00024629768,0.000088749104,0.00014678277,0.0000325651,0.0388759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99727327,0.0010976885,0.000024679533,0.00093920267,0.00055385527,0.000003103748,0.0000014633632,0.000001717774,0.000104994644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994468,0.000028279634,0.000071788025,0.00014072831,0.00016181567,0.0001505537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968165,0.000043007207,0.000024871892,0.000016354614,0.000108037806,0.00012609742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000525333,0.000068564834,0.00010398704,0.000016320242,0.00094977184,0.00011946154,0.000036677935,0.000031313888,0.000029941364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013124947,0.000067456625,0.000017974933,0.000049994218,0.0012751541,0.00019672391,0.00019021572,0.000049211485,0.000003092262],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064181313,0.00000645455,0.011905467,0.000005708116,0.00003478582,0.0000050526583,0.015498484,1.3452929e-7,0.0000012414533,0.97193944,0.00050814025,0.000088695444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019712049,0.000049698672,0.03324605,0.000010622337,0.00003471956,0.000005181513,0.22792892,0.000008540074,0.0000013261675,0.73552686,0.002894285,0.00009667736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03294235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003266704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23641255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000094901035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005905657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9734974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038032516","doi":"","title":"National Security And Judicial Ethics: The Exception To The Rule Of Keeping Judicial Conduct Judicial And The Politicization Of The Judiciary","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UNM’s Digital Repository (University of New Mexico)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Judicial review; Judicial activism; National security; Presidential system; Judicial independence; Supreme court; Separation of powers; Judicial opinion; Certiorari; Doctrine; Judicial discretion; Legislature; Politics; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.045375382362480766,"score_gpt":0.26561404316087267,"score_spread":0.2202386607983919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3038032516","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.808173,0.0007238717,0.00063640514,0.09303422,0.00057833776,0.00086926913,0.00009760414,0.000034238074,0.095853075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980882,0.0000866741,0.000011895486,0.001204981,0.00055262155,6.397167e-7,0.0000022935262,0.0000041111402,0.000048582366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827886,0.00028698513,0.00023458988,0.00019921438,0.00083281007,0.00016752371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851274,0.00061221665,0.00029275272,0.00010730028,0.00038453517,0.00009047317],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005442177,0.00010882122,0.00024195663,0.0000339146,0.0019609788,0.00005087582,0.00039934946,0.000102179016,0.00000841211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010648734,0.00007162841,0.00012204516,0.000416411,0.0035416053,0.0003010144,0.00031862725,0.0002508558,0.0000017767014],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049573573,0.00007244036,0.007837954,0.000024985839,0.00021876661,0.0000024824888,0.15377958,0.00015969457,0.0005282119,0.8324603,0.0027741618,0.0016457164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025826644,0.00028710475,0.18049242,0.00032357126,0.0005002487,0.0000143780835,0.13612871,0.00034790894,0.0006683978,0.6600281,0.018162014,0.0004645067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019093577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022698045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18991522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060970906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071405055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042348065","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0043","title":"The constitutional office of the legislature","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Normative; Constitutional theory; Political science; Power (physics); Constitutional law; Law and economics; Law; Constitutional economics; Constitutional review; Sociology; Constitution; Physics","score_opus":0.016714622466399664,"score_gpt":0.22174458412907877,"score_spread":0.20502996166267912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3042348065","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0045440635,0.0029266225,0.0003209635,0.022892337,0.00045911057,0.00007456425,0.000018439556,0.000007392233,0.9687565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99883586,0.00055294007,0.000058974572,0.00016594883,0.00018275778,9.50922e-9,1.2268967e-7,4.6424603e-7,0.000202914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942726,0.00007994592,0.00006694242,0.000041717656,0.00029847867,0.00008564446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995419,0.00007515338,0.00011240115,0.00003534843,0.00018151,0.00005369047],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017014283,0.000032248703,0.00006829088,0.0000015309516,0.0027830065,0.000011460337,0.0003366354,0.000029353741,0.0002191844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007992786,0.000021011421,0.000098170814,0.000034631397,0.0034496605,0.00014618637,0.00006423904,0.00009938949,0.0000023948392],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004058147,0.000008531586,0.0006280538,7.659822e-7,0.000039044102,0.0000018033445,0.0028408337,0.000016184342,0.000029313209,0.9918842,0.0041503576,0.00036035752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016120817,0.000016135127,0.0037322575,0.000014222131,0.00002508261,0.000002272574,0.013926856,0.0000021503804,0.000010292785,0.0022768117,0.9797999,0.00003281354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038868736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14143907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9942918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007782498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029114354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044361466","doi":"","title":"The Senate’s Review of Bills from the Commons, 1997-2015","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Political Science Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Legislation; Legislature; Commons; Legislative process; House of Representatives; Political science; Select committee; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Law; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology; Parliament","score_opus":0.043125629231409085,"score_gpt":0.3473873744301275,"score_spread":0.3042617451987184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3044361466","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007867439,0.5555955,8.1879455e-7,0.3701904,0.00019817818,0.00019704855,0.00008341546,0.000005339788,0.07365061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22791927,0.7069291,0.000016216889,0.06469988,0.00023849095,0.00002182601,0.0000052540145,0.000002863041,0.00016713704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99753755,0.00033744413,0.00030146248,0.00020343221,0.0006568856,0.00096320844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99761236,0.00062550267,0.00006112832,0.00031632953,0.00046978562,0.00091490615],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031399922,0.000083358354,0.00025934237,0.000012577264,0.00213283,0.0000666332,0.0007788622,0.000026488171,0.00028630538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009432824,0.000043698707,0.00011429174,0.0011798149,0.005194779,0.00008958731,0.00009217176,0.00012885979,0.00010774149],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.612788e-8,0.000003415736,0.0002481353,0.00012354011,0.0000055363485,0.0000045344245,0.000034659413,2.939912e-9,0.0000013879421,0.95799756,0.03427362,0.007307508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013374074,0.0000026184773,0.0016497625,0.0079177795,0.000039412673,0.000002435312,0.00029588648,1.7884408e-7,0.000009670565,0.026152262,0.96384627,0.00007037118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5122892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.62627506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9318453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046835636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009564929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99916625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044743545","doi":"10.32920/22341316","title":"Experimenting with Credibility in Refugee Adjudication: Gaydar","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; York University","keywords":"Refugee; Credibility; Persecution; Plaintiff; Adjudication; Immigration; Refugee law; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.05229393169868993,"score_gpt":0.35086599059646656,"score_spread":0.2985720588977766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3044743545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.545998,0.00011323473,0.00006516288,0.003950268,0.00007848192,0.000111221314,7.645747e-7,0.00015226076,0.4495306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987145,0.00004154672,0.00010742423,0.00010722845,0.00011140946,0.000026351225,0.0000014599974,0.0000015069841,0.00088855706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935156,0.00003852056,0.00008751342,0.00013056831,0.00022398224,0.00016788076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997982,0.00005406406,0.000018900046,0.000056749588,0.000040843523,0.0000312418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042489596,0.000036708727,0.000063253465,0.000036892703,0.00039440638,0.000015867787,0.00007337684,0.000021326714,0.00018649659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000105201776,0.000029222398,0.000013520951,0.00059474004,0.00030826748,0.000089339876,0.000031468007,0.000037404538,0.00014143031],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015090865,0.00004246698,0.19155821,0.0000022067095,0.000011257939,0.000008380907,0.0067157736,0.000030344241,0.00005906274,0.796998,0.0020359608,0.0025232204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005789858,0.00005500114,0.6709215,0.000063504056,0.000009567245,5.381728e-7,0.05730202,0.000110349356,0.0003250033,0.06052776,0.2097589,0.00034689024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007521622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013787795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7364703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051540468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011330945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044832999","doi":"10.24124/c677/20191602","title":"A Question They Can't Refuse? Canadian Reference Questions and Judicial Independence","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Political Science Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial discretion; Discretion; Independence (probability theory); Law; Statutory law; Political science; Power (physics); Judicial independence; Judicial review; Supreme court","score_opus":0.043209831112438424,"score_gpt":0.34774558991949917,"score_spread":0.30453575880706074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3044832999","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006474288,0.032338575,0.0000107400165,0.24790345,0.0005634055,0.0005242778,0.00022840222,0.00006193024,0.7118949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9709141,0.015755672,0.000076883705,0.012807007,0.0001886299,0.000025082094,0.0000062823524,0.000004015478,0.00022229853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968205,0.00021280273,0.00022929872,0.00043153684,0.0005999444,0.0017058913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99469155,0.0000864273,0.000034009747,0.00018691667,0.0006743709,0.0043267165],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018048823,0.00012795681,0.00023672456,0.00015513538,0.0026713416,0.0001621913,0.00033770117,0.00010371408,0.0002840557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057707643,0.00012373725,0.000038822494,0.0009903273,0.0025230164,0.00025974566,0.00005283905,0.00025315958,0.00008936299],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.5269674e-7,0.0000036569952,0.0018790427,0.000019375871,0.000002534724,0.00004634559,0.000115323724,6.055134e-8,0.0000041761828,0.9931342,0.0003525391,0.0044426206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000075437536,0.00002318113,0.0670194,0.0021207542,0.00007452906,0.000078111865,0.0009294988,0.0000034638936,0.000010179679,0.25115132,0.67802984,0.00048430098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99533355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96443987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002480491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040580828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99862707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3049061861","doi":"","title":"Unholy Trinity: The Failure of Administrative Constitutionalism in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CentAUR (University of Reading)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitutionalism; Charter; Law; Administrative law; Political science; Deference; Jurisprudence; Judicial review; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.052405010072611426,"score_gpt":0.24742039306486835,"score_spread":0.19501538299225693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3049061861","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83815277,0.00013905118,0.00012754105,0.04268917,0.0001362035,0.00021525344,0.00011055782,0.00001126044,0.11841817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999655,0.000053893295,0.000035553072,0.00017120069,0.000024585559,8.965328e-8,0.0000032231299,6.5590785e-7,0.000055779085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994588,0.00005806577,0.0000699189,0.00008531336,0.00022594821,0.000101950965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966866,0.00010300277,0.00007614215,0.000034638684,0.000058847043,0.000058684574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000092130285,0.000042212258,0.00012456176,0.00001629992,0.00032048006,0.000002913418,0.00018465082,0.000023021836,0.00010003341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000779257,0.000041288073,0.000035788384,0.0002692921,0.00095056416,0.00007193573,0.00004303986,0.00007387609,0.0000027571575],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051170497,0.000021791684,0.048624188,0.0000074566888,0.000046814814,0.000028436396,0.016643595,0.000009611427,0.00006819376,0.9288527,0.00507108,0.0005749634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010336322,0.000064438325,0.09525842,0.000095859854,0.00007155732,0.0000014573367,0.60811704,0.000021437962,0.0002425393,0.0062502027,0.28859988,0.0002435315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93034405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9750338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9226025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016412316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023517883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41719714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3049382754","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3641697","title":"Legislated Rights in the Real World","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science","score_opus":0.02222264136852277,"score_gpt":0.2858824229701268,"score_spread":0.263659781601604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3049382754","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20698905,0.0023657437,0.0001995215,0.09175392,0.00023347144,0.00020625147,0.0000011921346,0.0000490159,0.69820184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99646884,0.0014858752,0.000004963722,0.000712002,0.00088286324,0.0000024464487,4.0034107e-7,0.0000016801129,0.00044091762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824727,0.0001854864,0.00013592324,0.00008754839,0.00032310694,0.0010206903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997727,0.000061505736,0.000049240145,0.00003114623,0.000037632384,0.00004776924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012057195,0.00005948627,0.00008887012,0.000034394045,0.0009086168,0.000050284878,0.0002875544,0.000025655028,0.000038492497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000061291124,0.00003809896,0.00005350846,0.00050864636,0.00019278382,0.00011599637,0.000014492118,0.0009252129,0.000046652094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014611611,0.000013230794,0.002800697,1.5614192e-7,0.000020929658,0.000007382919,0.0033244723,0.0000035756375,0.000004035008,0.9922857,0.00034248878,0.0011826641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018810225,0.000048730006,0.0024839237,0.0000051800453,0.000010147896,0.0000046868486,0.0068475422,0.0000035389176,0.0000013879289,0.83386743,0.15647002,0.00006931564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020778613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3324103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7894798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032249634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014818405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9857421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3049611617","doi":"","title":"Electoral Rules, Corruption Charges, and Electoral Accountability: Comparative Analysis of Italy, Japan, and the United States","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Political science; Language change; State (computer science); Federalism; Electoral geography; Electoral system; Public administration; Political economy; Economics; Law; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.04438197163503042,"score_gpt":0.30739285990858534,"score_spread":0.2630108882735549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3049611617","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99226344,0.00570615,0.00022748805,0.00054866384,0.00005437756,0.00014525345,0.0000124193475,0.000013574521,0.0010286622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921904,0.007564763,0.000012755107,0.00006921513,0.00007896746,0.000005488507,0.000015505093,0.000002866389,0.000060028535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981608,0.00030910518,0.00026226905,0.0001532421,0.00030613563,0.00080843904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992322,0.00016523259,0.00020509597,0.000063255444,0.0002746407,0.000059631104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019611833,0.00012026428,0.00035372973,0.0001967457,0.00086433726,0.000050062743,0.00014934741,0.00005223264,0.00003564559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000799423,0.00008140749,0.000097997305,0.00080813526,0.0015019156,0.00019067252,0.000036504076,0.00050945004,0.0000018527071],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033265763,0.00006111373,0.17133506,0.0000017454656,0.0015320226,2.658865e-7,0.012513962,0.0000046850605,0.00002873421,0.813074,0.000020910687,0.0010948706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017703458,0.00044896436,0.33023015,0.000022024375,0.0022545366,0.00002278449,0.06908284,0.0006360592,0.0000471824,0.59213907,0.0029549173,0.00039113176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059533797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12671262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22093491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026670843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006424559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9467288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3061143068","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v10i2.9461","title":"Retreating to Justiciability","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Charter; Subjectivity; Law; Political science; Scope (computer science); Law and economics; Moral agency; Politics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.12165769100275119,"score_gpt":0.38900445348464635,"score_spread":0.26734676248189515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3061143068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8532198,0.006331656,0.0006244477,0.099578336,0.0010923819,0.00018417394,0.0000056256513,0.00004210239,0.038921498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958705,0.00034922714,0.00024037871,0.0017863456,0.0016634484,0.0000015024414,5.08265e-8,0.0000031298262,0.0000854656],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988363,0.0000987841,0.00033346633,0.000102280894,0.0004397405,0.00018941976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989544,0.00019485668,0.00015580116,0.000033760112,0.00048220356,0.00017897773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051590166,0.00008299802,0.0003003417,0.000027170945,0.0005528323,0.00004389826,0.00017851139,0.00002208416,0.000012484121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021694885,0.00006414272,0.00009298947,0.00024381973,0.00031997994,0.00019860467,0.000094324554,0.00013097243,0.000031273263],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041003735,0.00018381578,0.65686226,0.00010469397,0.0010631054,0.0004464701,0.21334273,0.0002766673,0.0006291363,0.0813676,0.0073847985,0.037928663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005824182,0.0008336213,0.07188899,0.00044909908,0.00028743825,0.000022685992,0.1254178,0.0000027524895,0.00022186348,0.006126706,0.7937,0.00046665515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040826784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074581685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7863152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000974601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013210892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4251995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081936494","doi":"10.7202/1075519ar","title":"Common Law Constitutionalism Through Methodology","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Common law; Law; Political science; Cornerstone; Legal culture; Comparative law; Public law; Legislature; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.16479050332137934,"score_gpt":0.3890236582032524,"score_spread":0.22423315488187306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081936494","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007666124,0.0014723308,0.0006792007,0.010854564,0.0016056033,0.00004414217,0.000034758403,0.000037113416,0.98450565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886193,0.0006255942,0.004617157,0.0050898218,0.00084866927,0.0000035579303,0.000004048452,0.000004152686,0.00018769629],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982417,0.00064270815,0.00024852646,0.00014976798,0.00040197145,0.00031529774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990258,0.00035220827,0.000091310954,0.000074854535,0.0003403037,0.00011549396],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008159848,0.00009341925,0.00022990821,0.000012488688,0.011589614,0.000067343135,0.00016252822,0.00009426896,0.0007622978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018892117,0.00008492859,0.00013319492,0.00016301723,0.0020718588,0.0002806329,0.00007626906,0.00028809547,0.00009117849],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007920819,0.0000388708,0.00009478238,0.000001044749,0.00006326039,0.00019819393,0.00032046536,0.000011849117,0.00003167359,0.9979284,0.0005614145,0.0007421336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013390348,0.000007545141,0.00004612477,0.000012415868,0.000018983417,0.00018695947,0.0010445095,2.0236683e-7,0.00023907823,0.38795918,0.6102803,0.000070828566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024524327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17469962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9878527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001272256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000100962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98969716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082049084","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v13n3p212","title":"From Manshiya to Alexandria: Re-Examining the Process of Constitutionalizing and Normalizing the Emergency Status in Egypt","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Transformative learning; Vitality; Constitutionalism; Politics; Context (archaeology); Rule of law; Corporate governance; Law; Order (exchange); Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Democracy; History; Management; Philosophy; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.0530302037109409,"score_gpt":0.32738181892041684,"score_spread":0.27435161520947593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082049084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95442015,0.0036354207,0.000107160384,0.015772203,0.00019119664,0.00008570555,0.000022617487,0.0000024039643,0.025763141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997921,0.0007164404,0.00005615017,0.0008963193,0.0004011702,9.504069e-7,2.3740576e-7,0.0000015745281,0.000006157848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992293,0.00006248971,0.00026439884,0.000058879057,0.00023285243,0.00015209435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994645,0.00016521776,0.00012352582,0.000024588231,0.00012244079,0.00009969164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034407925,0.00005019516,0.00013006222,0.000017109218,0.0004467549,0.000028298016,0.00009677408,0.000022902084,0.000023531244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025656394,0.000029900442,0.00002210182,0.00011890826,0.0005374315,0.00009836557,0.000041396845,0.000111684356,3.3875938e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011753688,0.000008711537,0.035442144,0.0000072290095,0.00002909986,0.00000520022,0.030532226,0.000033435204,0.000047248745,0.9335404,0.00018085117,0.00016171027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011137472,0.00030240943,0.15281041,0.00046147444,0.00020224645,0.000014148418,0.2837516,0.000069053756,0.0002072489,0.26037437,0.30035248,0.00034079197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010732866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003612406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67316604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016550144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014845844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99585474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082112013","doi":"10.1017/glj.2020.50","title":"The Conceptualization of Constitutional Supremacy: Global Discourse and Legal Tradition","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nova Scotia Department of Agriculture; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Law; Constitution; Political science; Doctrine; White supremacy; Supremacy Clause; Constitutional law; Sociology; Statute; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.03277042819051123,"score_gpt":0.3293126719201979,"score_spread":0.2965422437296867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082112013","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41510728,0.007124656,0.0132821305,0.106793396,0.0017913515,0.0004236202,0.00022190559,0.00007542914,0.45518023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99857455,0.0002822226,0.00002893923,0.00046425557,0.00063763605,0.0000011713068,0.0000026375053,9.2100095e-7,0.000007668111],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924093,0.00009511719,0.00016481255,0.00006541226,0.00031316836,0.00012055699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961376,0.000052882457,0.00009392595,0.000020669517,0.00011204708,0.00010671577],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021937836,0.000049630948,0.00008250684,0.0000044773433,0.0021337492,0.000086945256,0.000088894536,0.000025371071,0.000040025458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000080556245,0.000035679215,0.000041305382,0.00009203628,0.0045849094,0.00024543452,0.0000183414,0.00007952319,0.0000043202735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018799423,0.000008325648,0.0010251825,0.0000011048057,0.000021637237,0.00000559211,0.0011436233,0.00000962079,0.000019685533,0.9959012,0.0009135501,0.0009316805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010991873,0.00013571729,0.012429488,0.000067379544,0.00011153305,0.00017497786,0.024429515,0.00009998057,0.00006602001,0.31947675,0.6416376,0.00027184337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007066858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009480819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67642444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003854427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022935087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99916536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082371789","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i30.5994","title":"Justifying Particular Reasoning in a Legal Context","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Judgement; Relevance (law); Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Practical reason; Analytic reasoning; Deductive reasoning; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06630570841419381,"score_gpt":0.3038539489600181,"score_spread":0.2375482405458243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082371789","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40370616,0.00080726005,0.000342021,0.01316738,0.00022100226,0.00020387802,0.00000292911,0.00012135212,0.581428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99556446,0.000042657874,0.00009434774,0.0040652584,0.00019017092,0.0000094968755,9.957628e-7,0.0000012622677,0.00003136883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932915,0.000025776373,0.00014470836,0.00007679097,0.00018488527,0.00023866733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999794,0.0000332523,0.000032786316,0.000024792185,0.000034293236,0.00008089769],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019153774,0.0000540119,0.000101006124,0.00001664676,0.00034091674,0.00004505114,0.00009757476,0.00003905579,0.00008493797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044862635,0.00004756851,0.000035433615,0.00021918782,0.00021593785,0.0003124396,0.000050309718,0.00010361954,0.00015939512],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023606328,0.00000882144,0.019319711,0.0000039316783,0.0000073173196,0.00004035092,0.011560219,0.00015001038,0.0000095614005,0.96010315,0.0002391355,0.008534175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007809929,0.0001241547,0.040942583,0.00007801076,0.000021888158,0.000003837146,0.055760764,0.00087060174,0.00006592918,0.005365156,0.8955782,0.00040788297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047675273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025017215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.954738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029028846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000116274416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7207107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082811238","doi":"10.1093/icon/moaa055","title":"Populist rhetoric, false mirroring, and the courts","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mirroring; Rhetoric; Populism; Politics; Democracy; Representation (politics); Political science; Narrative; Sociology; Law; Law and economics","score_opus":0.035146984231668114,"score_gpt":0.3140154183536302,"score_spread":0.2788684341219621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082811238","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025101574,0.0069670663,0.006215766,0.40409562,0.006869453,0.00033623682,0.00008900609,0.000056251476,0.550269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99235344,0.0005494163,0.00022227418,0.0049250764,0.0018896933,0.0000026509467,0.0000017339644,0.0000021104927,0.00005363413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837357,0.000104599065,0.00035275077,0.00009902008,0.0009423593,0.00012768088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851066,0.00027716387,0.0002424506,0.000031802978,0.0007894187,0.00014851503],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058244925,0.00008730351,0.00018248976,0.000034506666,0.0006245153,0.00012629859,0.00039391423,0.00004094148,0.00011478052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006919098,0.000060271734,0.00012645187,0.00007526758,0.005731592,0.0003214987,0.0000786046,0.00018342695,0.000023823866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022783533,0.00002096939,0.0010313618,9.482598e-7,0.00015287686,0.000049692942,0.000858315,0.00002557741,0.000017601691,0.9957779,0.0014112886,0.00042561867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012652652,0.00002200446,0.00059116236,0.000034326295,0.000038798775,0.000082255254,0.0005217961,0.000010417837,0.000018442825,0.12792414,0.8694025,0.00008886347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010118512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025783226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96725184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008588564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045439237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99697423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3083185186","doi":"10.1017/cls.2020.7","title":"The Aftermath of Human Rights Protections: Gender Identity, Gender Expression, and the Socio-Legal Regulation of School Boards","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Queen's University; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Human rights; Redress; Political science; Harassment; Transgender; Context (archaeology); Gender studies; Identity (music); Fundamental rights; Norm (philosophy); Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.028998707744399076,"score_gpt":0.27965017381317503,"score_spread":0.250651466068776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3083185186","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9563745,0.0041679847,0.00022604439,0.014050762,0.00041954545,0.00052367843,0.000060178543,0.000008285779,0.024168981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983782,0.0002658361,0.000054209566,0.00079467415,0.00037477573,0.000008440658,0.0000011523995,0.000005873216,0.00011684825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878865,0.00020260605,0.00040964253,0.00012225928,0.0002031142,0.00027370488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847704,0.00015444779,0.000362224,0.00008436895,0.00042497896,0.00049694604],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012258529,0.00010266121,0.00028359666,0.00002118506,0.0030572254,0.00010517544,0.000232793,0.00010388164,0.00003601468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019674642,0.00007244724,0.00021929765,0.00014755683,0.0025717067,0.00036691554,0.000032096097,0.00028395045,2.8826665e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011713151,0.000003857046,0.00045050398,0.00002917974,0.00012797356,0.0000036930599,0.046958342,0.000005065468,0.00015863628,0.9511286,0.0010568257,0.0000656064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019741778,0.000118623706,0.024977544,0.00019961954,0.00029475364,0.000044601955,0.095050775,0.000037785594,0.000100920464,0.8019641,0.07491155,0.00032556328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14662495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48632172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33969676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021510359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008088105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99824065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3083505379","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: On The Web: Where to Find Canadian Legislation: Pre-Confederation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Business; Political science; World Wide Web; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.037650804471501036,"score_gpt":0.28518177296294545,"score_spread":0.2475309684914444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3083505379","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00036217598,0.0005574639,0.000016287224,0.16765887,0.001489777,0.00087565463,0.00007098806,0.000066765075,0.828902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21916689,0.002267306,0.00013073187,0.026611725,0.008843078,0.00043465936,0.00009847098,0.000033092736,0.74241406],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982034,0.00015063948,0.00027221418,0.00032112602,0.0006131441,0.00043950067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881274,0.00031220133,0.00008719814,0.00019681815,0.00033401014,0.00025703566],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041542822,0.00022144045,0.00022212937,0.00011996501,0.0028941138,0.00054268516,0.00041409212,0.00029959856,0.007469348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051928626,0.00015067954,0.000092877075,0.00017829321,0.00031777148,0.00016209959,0.000045358665,0.00026134696,0.002076691],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013139063,0.0000037763746,0.00005876875,0.0000014913659,0.000022263448,7.8579416e-7,0.0010550303,0.000008892092,6.938776e-7,0.40429005,0.5927861,0.0017708375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003450085,0.000029924347,0.00074356765,0.000103189406,0.000015139032,2.134939e-7,0.00160386,0.000008010351,0.0000021131145,0.0075549386,0.989685,0.00021954245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9093735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98414135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3968989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003700002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003208001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3084062994","doi":"10.1080/02722011.2020.1771527","title":"Do Lawyers Get More Votes?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Review of Canadian Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Period (music); Law; Public administration; Contingent vote; Politics; Voting; Group voting ticket","score_opus":0.07521940611557995,"score_gpt":0.36056821431651787,"score_spread":0.2853488082009379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3084062994","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005902424,0.5212191,0.0000016391433,0.3939763,0.00009809572,0.00033085843,0.000040035047,0.000024672321,0.07840692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49017116,0.4686927,0.000043257067,0.040807854,0.00022056521,0.000020090423,7.1496044e-7,0.000003915219,0.000039764],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989907,0.0001364182,0.00019240896,0.00013110143,0.0002897233,0.0002596271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918145,0.00014939318,0.00016429806,0.00010627324,0.00020337556,0.00019521678],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036105298,0.00009538218,0.00044166247,0.00004496945,0.00063713576,0.0000085257025,0.00029663544,0.000008016679,0.00004096208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010531858,0.00006280279,0.00010462614,0.0012235177,0.0034295116,0.00003703003,0.000051181676,0.00007430841,0.000041423846],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014929921,0.000012926729,0.006523225,0.0007923572,0.00090798934,0.000027148828,0.040619574,0.000002884667,0.000006467616,0.3491238,0.4333485,0.1686202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028032522,0.000032135682,0.00248755,0.0005751028,0.00008409623,3.9640778e-7,0.024168242,1.7261172e-7,0.0000014719948,0.0013542796,0.97116643,0.000102081045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38089782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26818016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53781796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000075473035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044827175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3085760204","doi":"","title":"The Circumstances of Change: Understanding the Bedford/Carter Exceptions to Vertical Stare Decisis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Test (biology); Political science; Power (physics); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.12143346184579802,"score_gpt":0.3289834913742068,"score_spread":0.20755002952840879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3085760204","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18245333,0.018354584,0.09459971,0.6819919,0.0010974599,0.00083827705,0.000017709355,0.000068269845,0.020578759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99320734,0.005102733,0.000006446578,0.00081051164,0.0008285743,0.000009765062,1.9513833e-7,0.0000037018167,0.00003075704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819815,0.00011299297,0.00018043647,0.00009661158,0.00047071977,0.00094107166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994704,0.00023362073,0.000045919405,0.00005588985,0.00009807639,0.000096053074],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093336863,0.00006812881,0.000103426384,0.000018904666,0.0025433016,0.000076634446,0.00034031877,0.000028988723,0.000028204942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003003609,0.00003864193,0.00009405794,0.00035383983,0.0004646788,0.0001179895,0.000043545013,0.00045339772,0.000015398582],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028665614,0.000007316023,0.0015508125,4.7674197e-7,0.000073272466,4.6831732e-7,0.009264145,0.0000053734257,0.00001687529,0.9835035,0.00032888312,0.0052201822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013505603,0.00015444611,0.0020197097,0.000016456874,0.000042714815,0.000004463787,0.21712397,0.000008565629,0.0000051328393,0.753525,0.02687584,0.000088655856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041489047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02067375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.810754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005938495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00097643543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088099997","doi":"10.9734/jesbs/2020/v33i930253","title":"Legal and Political Considerations Associated with the Cancellation of the Court Challenges Program of Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education Society and Behavioural Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; The Lung Association Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Government (linguistics); Constitution; Politics; Supreme court; Conservative government; Political science; Public administration; Interpretation (philosophy); Subsidy; Demise; Sociology","score_opus":0.054614056148461126,"score_gpt":0.3153950855019081,"score_spread":0.26078102935344694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3088099997","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8291615,0.00048755642,0.0000025749616,0.1689453,0.00010769083,0.00009342176,0.0000035904468,0.0000014089302,0.0011969358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99926364,0.00010346314,0.000064877626,0.00048778584,0.000061562925,0.0000016140044,8.8652186e-8,6.920702e-7,0.000016275897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920565,0.000044475673,0.00013758578,0.000054608812,0.00045289315,0.00010476233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989827,0.00011647472,0.00021648605,0.000023572331,0.0005763916,0.00008433463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042454273,0.000035123154,0.00008220091,0.0000054933325,0.0007855262,0.000028687089,0.00008571125,0.000017696355,0.0000045804845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028357207,0.000018647901,0.000027497697,0.00020895505,0.0020774626,0.00014863223,0.000019478854,0.00008588892,7.468039e-9],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016065154,0.00027723415,0.17885469,0.000015577358,0.00006575832,5.883595e-7,0.045645762,0.000029437138,0.00077286013,0.7617605,0.0076946346,0.004866915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017161672,0.0001505907,0.89196086,0.00007259257,0.00009045955,0.0000071866416,0.101653025,0.000030047297,0.0003163757,0.0019130069,0.003558976,0.00007524637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058626097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13424593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75984746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008472762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050935056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94764256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3089379721","doi":"10.1177/1354066120938843","title":"Domestic courts, transnational law, and international order","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"International law; Law; Sovereignty; Political science; Municipal law; Extraterritoriality; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics; Jurisdiction","score_opus":0.03355747996606828,"score_gpt":0.29905330554225196,"score_spread":0.2654958255761837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3089379721","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0112677775,0.0003726455,0.017961543,0.21446352,0.0015250269,0.0000816394,0.000038841274,0.00003207646,0.75425696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936774,0.00019434902,0.0021832034,0.0020316383,0.0011945871,7.7814224e-7,0.000008777545,0.000008197611,0.00070106576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986415,0.00016241445,0.00039524699,0.00011209039,0.00058439694,0.000104364655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985634,0.00018860673,0.00021965697,0.000028767989,0.0008364168,0.00016312592],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056167797,0.00008221438,0.000107698994,0.000086502136,0.00037931727,0.00009945914,0.000316769,0.000021769221,0.0010879342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082852505,0.00007746332,0.00007662843,0.00013552968,0.00039077172,0.00043204852,0.00004649943,0.00020876405,0.00007822567],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036183214,0.00003662231,0.0024249877,7.230755e-7,0.00014839639,0.000048304963,0.002615966,0.00039261006,0.000047308877,0.98970336,0.0033591723,0.001186397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000818965,0.00006834825,0.022483138,0.000027750908,0.000046433517,0.00005415673,0.0012418033,0.00025180922,0.0000034918344,0.019336678,0.95552516,0.00014227335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026468771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003946041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9824096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007140227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017044219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3090639801","doi":"","title":"Elements and Implications of the Supreme Court's New Rigorous Approach to Construction of Statutory Purpose","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Supreme court; Statutory law; Legislature; Adjudication; Political science; Law; Legislative intent; Proportionality (law); Legislation; Charter; Legislative history; Adversarial system; Judicial interpretation; Law and economics; Judicial review; Sociology","score_opus":0.015545169740111258,"score_gpt":0.2664079380660819,"score_spread":0.2508627683259706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3090639801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91191655,0.0034766484,0.030006975,0.018986378,0.00040168216,0.00061675644,0.00003260383,0.000020836855,0.03454156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970239,0.0021288132,0.00027490457,0.00003580428,0.00013248915,0.0000034347984,1.6738295e-7,0.000002428279,0.00039805574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989296,0.00006772841,0.00019349766,0.00008439984,0.00023250298,0.0004922228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995591,0.000036402755,0.0001476759,0.00006550001,0.0001299668,0.00006132082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063463865,0.000051541938,0.000098895485,0.0000349874,0.00041463185,0.000008858554,0.00016549001,0.000027703558,0.000008986042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010386174,0.000030567102,0.00004332924,0.00015136859,0.00044377576,0.00009163318,0.000037320442,0.00014783745,0.0000012995981],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001224926,0.000024397554,0.022281341,8.509489e-7,0.000051619554,1.317261e-8,0.00051173836,8.289387e-7,0.0009093365,0.92628753,0.00015404502,0.049766053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042484066,0.00009221226,0.040136,0.000026357082,0.000045650482,0.000024892757,0.0057348576,2.7619384e-7,0.00014086705,0.9368463,0.016443457,0.00008428118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014867111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037978014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08510734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002827354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023786693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42196572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3091932690","doi":"10.1111/lapo.12156","title":"Can a leopard change its spots? Strategic behavior versus professional role conception during Ukraine's 2014 court chair elections","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ballot; Law; Judicial independence; Ukrainian; Judicial reform; Political science; Judicial activism; Incentive; Impartiality; Sociology; Supreme court; Judicial review; Politics; Voting; Economics","score_opus":0.09939561497367691,"score_gpt":0.35899351728644147,"score_spread":0.2595979023127646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3091932690","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.796473,0.00059483567,7.049983e-7,0.07908598,0.000791813,0.00066673174,0.000118993914,0.00024370312,0.12202422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99285126,0.00022204786,0.0000055691953,0.0015589566,0.0047134506,0.0002164951,0.0000136811195,0.0000079910105,0.00041052507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988312,0.00007944678,0.0001438223,0.0002211107,0.00033577468,0.0003886091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952936,0.00003500958,0.000068543915,0.00005589247,0.00010883483,0.00020237242],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007625817,0.00012487167,0.0001525221,0.00002743402,0.0015576578,0.00004488257,0.00014193758,0.00008585955,0.00024734065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056493565,0.00012330255,0.000074085765,0.0003313081,0.0003820874,0.00017198312,0.000057553025,0.00016370139,0.00016801497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008452743,0.00006602183,0.0011011777,0.000005977448,0.00002578645,0.000007852902,0.0074718595,0.0000039247916,0.0009317596,0.98945755,0.00035166854,0.000491909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0070116566,0.0011673844,0.2488731,0.0002364952,0.0004639254,0.00001567536,0.071190916,0.00012220202,0.001973025,0.030118642,0.63629645,0.002530493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052504387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03970804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9593389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017939591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040966342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093402298","doi":"","title":"A Citizen's Guide to the Rule of Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Law; Political science; Rule of law; Public law; Private law; Due process; Municipal law; Philosophy of law; Comparative law; Ideal (ethics); Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.017682675739071497,"score_gpt":0.2914910922173161,"score_spread":0.2738084164782446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093402298","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046860337,0.005395499,0.0046677627,0.44480574,0.0003769528,0.00026979632,0.0000076125325,0.000045969213,0.49757034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99429864,0.0010374236,0.00003426803,0.0033386305,0.00083606,0.0000025191662,1.61267e-7,0.0000028042443,0.00044947735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864286,0.00006716308,0.00014338312,0.00007223669,0.0003080722,0.0007663124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968565,0.000041550644,0.000055360357,0.00003675252,0.00010072078,0.00007998509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000870034,0.000049077356,0.00009517094,0.000011363179,0.0007832921,0.000023575421,0.0002790462,0.000021162085,0.00004277046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020068584,0.00003325454,0.00007187877,0.00018244027,0.0002256918,0.00005355201,0.000040207546,0.00037066176,0.000058854974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001328253,0.0000062565914,0.000120497134,3.5530712e-7,0.0000409276,6.8614503e-7,0.0030534123,0.000011036037,0.000054941615,0.99271184,0.0011923306,0.0027944355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011443714,0.00009047207,0.00013087316,0.0000061199225,0.00001622154,0.000005386212,0.010040964,0.0000011530918,0.000037757392,0.32720977,0.6622901,0.000056737124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004459854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013058116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9474383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018269887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015538405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7286735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095411060","doi":"10.32920/22056788.v1","title":"Twelve Angry (White) Men: The Constitutionality of the Statement of Principles","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Obligation; Law; Statutory law; Sociology; Racism; Political science; Law and economics; Denial; Supreme court; Psychology","score_opus":0.0817242655275269,"score_gpt":0.33820879213823635,"score_spread":0.2564845266107094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3095411060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16171245,0.00014857229,0.00007167942,0.02324114,0.00032703712,0.00033571702,0.00005496779,0.000039231305,0.8140692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99779785,0.000118793636,0.000020937558,0.00012805879,0.00005359822,0.000011216609,0.0000011873302,8.422782e-7,0.0018675477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990414,0.00010800909,0.00020325095,0.000074267475,0.00045289408,0.00012021771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994832,0.000165855,0.00009354647,0.000098123295,0.00014115198,0.00001812124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008959739,0.000042488213,0.00008724139,0.00001359506,0.0006157324,0.000006535769,0.00021789079,0.000019605599,0.0001868554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021442032,0.000020837246,0.000070733004,0.00038746413,0.0023142642,0.00003764203,0.00013733206,0.000037796028,0.000016075715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034179159,0.000018781639,0.05407115,0.0000032215844,0.00003132818,1.6564987e-7,0.0018305961,0.00007358941,0.000035915105,0.9397633,0.0040301643,0.00013837051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019688421,0.000016199576,0.54348755,0.000038159553,0.000036090463,2.437694e-7,0.03511271,0.000023743005,0.0008411002,0.08203926,0.33810505,0.000102996506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063522877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005428605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.857724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032831253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036142222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9602801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095589026","doi":"10.7256/2454-0706.2020.9.33730","title":"The influence of procedural features of constitutional control on the style of argumentation: a comparative study","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Право и политика","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dissenting opinion; Normative; Procedural justice; Law; Norm (philosophy); Political science; Style (visual arts); Constitution; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04172669897233182,"score_gpt":0.32920533773064153,"score_spread":0.2874786387583097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3095589026","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96855974,0.00027358442,0.000024469107,0.009875658,0.00006047778,0.00073330745,0.0000502732,0.000009843546,0.020412618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994258,0.000018956018,0.0000073195174,0.00042498947,0.00006547574,0.000034189292,7.08425e-7,9.658233e-7,0.000021550026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887395,0.00016904534,0.00024408493,0.00010018705,0.00050788466,0.00010487691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986994,0.0006745372,0.00021152911,0.00006306323,0.00032031257,0.00003111833],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002996184,0.00007021923,0.00018927941,0.0000121617495,0.00057711964,0.000012045339,0.00023260349,0.000019804938,0.000023036855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044180828,0.000038982413,0.000054661487,0.00024014879,0.0032266031,0.000061578845,0.000030054805,0.00008316722,0.0000047430603],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021230677,0.00014393141,0.015527694,0.000005388114,0.00015158465,5.4168396e-7,0.026349189,0.00050054805,0.00042588497,0.95555395,0.0010223987,0.00010659315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002432868,0.0012999304,0.70237994,0.00013098252,0.00018378165,9.320288e-7,0.26292956,0.000032338805,0.002656977,0.01684258,0.010843446,0.00026663087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008739245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006725013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93871135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018028853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029569803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095748209","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3708975","title":"Proximate Causation in Legal HIstoriography","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Proximate and ultimate causation; Historiography; Causation; Law; Political science; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01572380231030005,"score_gpt":0.26129182956052943,"score_spread":0.2455680272502294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3095748209","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6182039,0.021810995,0.004848532,0.13058281,0.0013312236,0.0006067473,0.0000043783007,0.00019025522,0.2224212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99539554,0.003525897,0.000019059846,0.00030551458,0.00061531883,0.0000037922491,5.4422765e-7,0.0000031080715,0.00013119992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985031,0.00007490044,0.00014265899,0.00009599019,0.00026132955,0.00092204416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997861,0.00001487377,0.00005961184,0.000020325322,0.000052969266,0.00006612634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073938153,0.00005721122,0.000091853195,0.00006055248,0.0004878792,0.00003509899,0.00011862811,0.000034164055,0.000020588443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000104591796,0.000053901706,0.00006096945,0.0003922482,0.00012896837,0.000208009,0.000012722689,0.0006110128,0.000020601172],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020427547,0.00001764541,0.010516412,7.063784e-7,0.000021654045,0.000004003477,0.0020695657,0.000007080732,0.00003343128,0.98270965,0.0001451565,0.0044542965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000510772,0.00017077704,0.0049555274,0.000014186466,0.000020937281,0.0000134012225,0.013534484,0.000014471036,0.000009245496,0.71863127,0.26192418,0.00020072282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005083909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035006687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3771917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007520858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020271973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98260194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3096895842","doi":"10.7202/1072653ar","title":"The 1938 Holmes Case and Challenging the Statutory Authority of the Commission of Government","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Newfoundland and Labrador Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Dartmouth College; Eli Lilly and Company","keywords":"Statutory law; Commission; Government (linguistics); Law; Public administration; Business; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0493052960621721,"score_gpt":0.30678299595690417,"score_spread":0.25747769989473207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3096895842","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8950356,0.045883022,0.0000066847188,0.048069403,0.00027673747,0.00024228597,0.000030834282,0.000011670607,0.010443758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903335,0.009246534,0.000005072992,0.000121828314,0.000122020705,0.000004974067,5.0797002e-8,0.0000016517033,0.00016436941],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999271,0.00011690205,0.000128179,0.000091619906,0.00028143535,0.00011088359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992783,0.0004957582,0.00008448141,0.000059840724,0.00004729867,0.00003432678],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034926558,0.000068652014,0.000143365,0.0000028547604,0.002457927,0.000021102995,0.00009354516,0.000019607143,0.0000018881083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028101835,0.000028811515,0.000034134708,0.000086199434,0.0016054726,0.000038084334,0.00019137384,0.000081575,1.5631153e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008396494,0.0000475994,0.13186441,0.00010286199,0.00042081988,0.000016916845,0.15032041,0.0000050098533,0.00007708371,0.66520405,0.0021419807,0.049714874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005445533,0.00013843177,0.18888426,0.00012353259,0.00015395311,0.000011027768,0.39777383,0.000036107424,0.000034206707,0.009658645,0.40247142,0.00017002746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005869605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017361665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6555454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023195651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030378804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99884075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3100057134","doi":"10.5539/ilr.v9n1p100","title":"The Impact of Appeals on the Parliamentary Elections in Jordan","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Law Research","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nomination; Appeal; Legislator; Political science; General election; Principle of legality; Transparency (behavior); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Legislation","score_opus":0.17080819681162548,"score_gpt":0.47070011237864573,"score_spread":0.2998919155670202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3100057134","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31324703,0.0001106947,0.0000031004397,0.13691911,0.0001073762,0.00021064843,0.000018196373,0.0000074469963,0.5493764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990146,0.00019102852,0.0000023610514,0.00028072944,0.00027093408,0.00002964559,0.0000011506174,0.00000172345,0.00020781001],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865687,0.0002550265,0.000111917085,0.00008491006,0.0007164702,0.00017483233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870324,0.0009843896,0.00002222011,0.000047848327,0.00020358666,0.000038741888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010406417,0.000033626908,0.00004711988,0.000026985888,0.0008686267,0.0000558819,0.000395713,0.000016493821,0.00019473079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000634139,0.000018016563,0.000056016353,0.00030986854,0.00093685946,0.000051179235,0.000072030256,0.00021315546,0.00005966798],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000480992,0.000032771994,0.0047459393,2.3170695e-7,0.000038885686,0.0000014048079,0.00082842406,0.00005363255,0.00006269247,0.98936313,0.004040532,0.00078424247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034436246,0.00035007473,0.06253049,0.000059200644,0.000003270174,6.928195e-7,0.013901927,0.0002512054,0.0004504173,0.5058937,0.4160864,0.00012822579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09765469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027029628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6857676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017337388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019630104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99072456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3100198338","doi":"10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.94","title":"Constitutional and Legal Regulation of State Authority Interaction on Citizen Appeals: Foreign Experience","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Criminology and Sociology","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legalization; Dialectic; State (computer science); Political science; Law; Government (linguistics); Democracy; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.10921446496000822,"score_gpt":0.37320166031873603,"score_spread":0.26398719535872783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3100198338","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9798,0.00031493168,0.0018696077,0.010067599,0.0005887261,0.00004623094,0.000010408178,0.000006939629,0.0072955573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982206,0.0004722779,0.00013818414,0.0007883368,0.00036257293,0.0000016171435,0.0000021432982,0.0000011251014,0.000013149049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913645,0.00015915064,0.0002969829,0.00010501676,0.00020356994,0.00009884837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900186,0.00026776595,0.00027233208,0.000018747174,0.00037660857,0.00006267705],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025694616,0.00006358347,0.00018262009,0.00005343601,0.0001955963,0.000011968646,0.000119987184,0.00009162815,0.000054198106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005629602,0.000057018373,0.000045233523,0.000012707001,0.003534835,0.00019494772,0.000042241907,0.00018065126,0.0000018362874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031755405,0.000022988203,0.0041592903,0.0000023013354,0.00008815784,0.00001655206,0.007819414,0.000025635962,0.00049259723,0.9831092,0.00009486684,0.0038514524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012333367,0.0006705237,0.081195265,0.00006257465,0.000053724536,0.00018417224,0.010165376,0.00007795276,0.0007191394,0.873709,0.031753626,0.00017526351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013848071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008677848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10940014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042269185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013086795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3102915395","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: The Law of Canada: Secondary Sources","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.11466412897941308,"score_gpt":0.3690039311192978,"score_spread":0.2543398021398847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3102915395","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015883749,0.011989004,8.577262e-7,0.0225813,0.0010089045,0.00021209965,0.00013541133,0.000020133602,0.9638935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30261016,0.0034350737,0.000068326146,0.005099075,0.008083587,0.00008249102,0.00005360976,0.000030769825,0.6805369],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965422,0.00042188528,0.00029905283,0.00020025224,0.002072611,0.0004639859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99746346,0.0008503134,0.000105595085,0.00018788603,0.0012798363,0.00011291256],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034323845,0.00012161983,0.00029303253,0.000048643185,0.002157658,0.00005502264,0.0008272911,0.00016719887,0.000847576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007532707,0.00007420032,0.00006885542,0.0003558091,0.004272765,0.000059012564,0.0002718458,0.0005038102,0.000018489573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020322934,0.000004064477,0.000016407803,0.0000061675278,0.00003580041,0.000002177915,0.0011266686,6.4833364e-7,1.12722795e-7,0.43368077,0.5647745,0.0003506693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003497584,0.000012536069,0.0000505536,0.000044762768,0.000011394585,3.005181e-7,0.036960315,1.2117606e-7,0.0000067902824,0.058298472,0.9044907,0.00008905708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9978179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99893165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3753823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035495625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020316044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3106304731","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0066","title":"Notwithstanding rights, review, or remedy? On the notwithstanding clause and the operation of legislation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Law; Constitution; Charter; Legislature; Fundamental rights; Bill of rights; Law and economics; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.04378781811301545,"score_gpt":0.26094789933883056,"score_spread":0.2171600812258151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3106304731","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025067158,0.018606655,0.005736602,0.14599918,0.00052253646,0.0010924378,0.000026525307,0.000033306576,0.80291563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889787,0.010309242,0.00008233654,0.00042898042,0.00012542373,4.8821715e-8,2.5742293e-7,0.0000010086344,0.000073997086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927735,0.00018924836,0.00010979171,0.000060492897,0.00029091898,0.00007221994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946135,0.0001849835,0.00015701856,0.00003714403,0.00011657883,0.000042939446],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006645791,0.000044791363,0.00013183604,0.000004743401,0.0019826854,0.000020763036,0.00013968142,0.0000221085,0.00032712176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014495064,0.000023837692,0.00004867241,0.000041519157,0.0007355116,0.000269898,0.000030488442,0.00008391065,0.0000010122162],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003297161,0.0000073269816,0.00015730727,0.0000086872005,0.0000452342,0.000003211586,0.01542118,0.000012060091,0.000022313732,0.98195577,0.0016224231,0.0004147786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035587982,0.00045582905,0.0017897519,0.0020352658,0.00049625314,0.0000121925805,0.1005113,0.00039885083,0.00013289916,0.012997413,0.87729156,0.00031987912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031982213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1014858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9689583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011113708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006128056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W310680922","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i1.4563","title":"Reimagining Haj Khalil v. Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science; Geography; Medicine; History","score_opus":0.04375297097071363,"score_gpt":0.3320573126985284,"score_spread":0.2883043417278148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W310680922","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05513066,0.00039200496,0.00019688735,0.034719422,0.00094045105,0.00028087787,0.000016253683,0.00006340201,0.90826005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99486154,0.000035017223,0.00023029969,0.0033313711,0.0006055143,0.0000040054942,8.694946e-7,0.0000034663087,0.0009279222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988915,0.000036387664,0.00017123793,0.00016051179,0.00047730334,0.00026309508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994416,0.00009193084,0.00006626036,0.000100693665,0.0001705196,0.00012898378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019984809,0.00008086274,0.00015398851,0.000046592522,0.0003934255,0.000055175817,0.00040526298,0.00003276641,0.00013322056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038930037,0.0000721307,0.000030157493,0.00028884187,0.00014791462,0.00021677672,0.00006278671,0.0000941951,0.000020659783],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018594504,0.00020477718,0.026972927,0.00006726311,0.00013598146,0.00010933571,0.009966123,0.0007412644,0.0008815378,0.685665,0.21721576,0.057854094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034531715,0.00008358325,0.1898521,0.00018005066,0.00021270623,0.000001440615,0.004831334,0.000014125064,0.00061877497,0.011164846,0.79222196,0.0004737696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7350088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.53115577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9397309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010880344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010510565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47739944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107770851","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2020-0056","title":"A unified model of public law: Charter values and reasonableness review in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Administrative law; Proportionality (law); Jurisprudence; Law; Normative; Judicial review; Political science; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.040249437279116576,"score_gpt":0.2285426591580825,"score_spread":0.1882932218789659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107770851","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11457624,0.072745815,0.00047710966,0.041849643,0.00018401029,0.0003173835,0.00007060929,0.000014736612,0.7697644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812864,0.018076366,0.000104883424,0.00046626077,0.000024591904,2.6804763e-8,3.392757e-7,8.339788e-7,0.000040287716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945277,0.000079118865,0.000088874884,0.000060325452,0.00021639686,0.00010253961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999632,0.000021449225,0.00008130735,0.000024649373,0.00013417154,0.00010639859],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021478275,0.00003791706,0.00016095374,0.000003820756,0.00034033592,0.0000056054223,0.00012986298,0.000016750002,0.00013382018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002553168,0.000039068833,0.000027784305,0.000030987714,0.00028030254,0.0002782151,0.0000399065,0.000050940962,1.8491e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003055709,0.000023107988,0.0031918136,0.00008520206,0.000051926294,0.000020571615,0.0056931465,0.000034765108,0.00002094359,0.98612297,0.0018635977,0.0028613743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0045494884,0.0003184379,0.021542149,0.004484633,0.0005100715,0.000020842146,0.2589708,0.002741386,0.000049621307,0.062077936,0.6434866,0.0012480351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.992961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99847925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9240451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026941323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074811897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26176232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3109893383","doi":"10.4337/9781789906516.00022","title":"The comparative institutional analysis of parliamentary ethics","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Democracy; Law; Transparency (behavior); Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.11492235441473142,"score_gpt":0.3271842325883522,"score_spread":0.2122618781736208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3109893383","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005331185,0.0011047468,0.00011306857,0.00978965,0.00083567435,0.00024284952,0.0002085568,0.000069858084,0.98758227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7812285,0.0010024403,0.00034219772,0.0050762314,0.0036108408,0.000061735715,0.0004336906,0.00004147062,0.2082029],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997244,0.00015574145,0.0004894209,0.00035284815,0.0014883043,0.00026970668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975152,0.001124239,0.00042069683,0.00019929133,0.0005909389,0.00014960751],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013805978,0.0002419173,0.00060034933,0.00017596324,0.002738613,0.00058091694,0.0007506691,0.0003949981,0.00012560724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006301862,0.00019083386,0.00044902766,0.00015763463,0.0032303778,0.00029593348,0.00026654184,0.001250448,0.000029413],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021753507,0.0000059374697,0.00007231954,0.0000054071256,0.0024314336,0.0000054849734,0.00868353,0.000023171628,8.1767894e-7,0.97262675,0.0138184065,0.0023049673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007291009,0.000017000995,0.00019014312,0.00006384351,0.000788659,2.0775997e-7,0.0020195367,0.000009954537,0.000002889406,0.097734585,0.8988963,0.00020396803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009602066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052260455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8850779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025606775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00186643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111648035","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0039","title":"Private law rights as democratic participation: Kelsen on private law and (economic) democracy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Private law; Law; Public law; Ideology; Political science; Comparative law; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Politics; Law and economics","score_opus":0.02063517685177603,"score_gpt":0.25169710591330874,"score_spread":0.23106192906153272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111648035","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20988622,0.00024977094,0.000084621424,0.008941892,0.00018675871,0.00012519077,0.00000881373,0.000028401566,0.7804883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99805295,0.00024243367,0.0003075269,0.0009828303,0.00027330298,8.583642e-8,8.330413e-7,0.0000025732957,0.00013747736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991886,0.00011177905,0.00014397112,0.00014381522,0.00021793642,0.00019388385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942064,0.00007543506,0.00014504854,0.00005320755,0.000056621608,0.00024906988],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016479999,0.00009014991,0.0001868224,0.000006169163,0.0028670984,0.0000496926,0.00019504082,0.000053292184,0.00061113486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019212814,0.00009068827,0.000070177615,0.000020405447,0.0009336616,0.00058381545,0.00007388893,0.00010463697,0.000044130218],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008700545,0.000025475596,0.000636413,0.0000026831428,0.00006936101,0.000026314772,0.0040108436,0.000024065062,0.000015886117,0.9945001,0.00037357316,0.00022830511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010256994,0.00031558942,0.003761766,0.00006428193,0.00012162981,0.0000067666424,0.0028646751,0.00004757765,0.0001358984,0.22052597,0.7708664,0.00026376176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13610202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29396603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7881667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021286479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058260695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112240481","doi":"10.22459/acni.2023.04","title":"Building National Identity through the Constitution: The Canadian Charter Experience","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"ANU Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitution; Identity (music); Political science; Law; Public administration; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.1405518457205271,"score_gpt":0.35044220264207343,"score_spread":0.20989035692154634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112240481","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000021949314,0.00051797164,0.00005854409,0.0016834685,0.0013529627,0.000396275,0.00008669287,0.00006980185,0.99581236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15750249,0.00031831174,0.000023995235,0.002979738,0.0025648205,0.00018132123,0.000008923055,0.000016256896,0.83640414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981806,0.000049702725,0.00020740206,0.00026801787,0.00096698117,0.0003272812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991391,0.00019435964,0.00011330103,0.00017200573,0.0002999148,0.0000813224],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004266194,0.0001774737,0.00015795782,0.000034492095,0.004566583,0.0002903346,0.0006433332,0.00018006288,0.000105783336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000115050585,0.00011711443,0.00012590992,0.000022575454,0.0040314724,0.0001822323,0.00014698679,0.00032976113,0.00013231524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015089707,0.0000010021262,0.0000026914565,0.000001731491,0.000054294087,0.000009580011,0.009940545,0.0000024140597,5.2677046e-7,0.98281413,0.0067203785,0.00045121703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022670252,0.000001939553,0.000016535369,0.000034661996,0.00001699547,0.0000015208396,0.00023843956,6.095338e-7,0.0000021465664,0.4343312,0.5652363,0.000096993885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.74025536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8066719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5585159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025723802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012987467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112428326","doi":"","title":"When Is Executive Lawmaking Constitutional in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lawmaking; Delegation; Discretion; Supreme court; Legislature; Political science; Separation of powers; Law; Constitutional law; Judicial review; Executive order; Constitutional review; Law and economics; Administrative law; Delegate; Constitution; Economics","score_opus":0.01947843635760517,"score_gpt":0.25509633427455614,"score_spread":0.23561789791695098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112428326","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2796731,0.016991854,0.007444976,0.29208693,0.0014593484,0.0005894045,0.00006488656,0.00006817388,0.40162134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99515396,0.0012542048,0.000019683646,0.0029790606,0.00047116244,0.0000028231057,8.2756816e-7,0.000002362426,0.00011590693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979629,0.000077923,0.00017867364,0.00013198006,0.0004396917,0.0012088207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965906,0.00005357318,0.00007003684,0.000024431385,0.000083562714,0.00010935873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047478938,0.00008027659,0.00013324387,0.000025944066,0.00068815995,0.000028983797,0.00019156854,0.000030581723,0.00012567358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015674358,0.00007730407,0.00004471512,0.00019367543,0.0004195919,0.00014485487,0.000030605588,0.00078324176,0.000016548103],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017189324,0.0000068139834,0.020978091,5.534634e-7,0.000044304477,0.000015302665,0.0025305,0.000015326525,0.0000046840455,0.97274137,0.0014956726,0.0021502217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003867408,0.000034277582,0.001062319,0.000021129546,0.000014148429,0.000024778676,0.048260037,0.00001714694,0.0000089119685,0.8042536,0.14573717,0.00017974466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91231257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9931925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71548086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003295988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041911546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96351993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112479627","doi":"","title":"Court-Packing in 2021: Pathways to Democratic Legitimacy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Legitimacy; Law; Presidential system; Separation of powers; Populism; Aside; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Judicial review; Politics","score_opus":0.038297679505695355,"score_gpt":0.2836243771021592,"score_spread":0.24532669759646386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112479627","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21520643,0.0010752063,0.00049585686,0.0661561,0.0006767995,0.0007112914,0.000029264247,0.0001680115,0.71548104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906813,0.00006669918,0.00033267628,0.0077476245,0.00096320425,0.000036351266,0.0000023793814,0.0000070959254,0.00016265319],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986277,0.0001041552,0.00021569178,0.00027177937,0.00039826406,0.00038241103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993702,0.00009960171,0.000040320476,0.000084707215,0.00007387328,0.0003312623],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028673178,0.00011541187,0.00020821148,0.00002911561,0.0006790524,0.000103691666,0.0002468621,0.000058841473,0.00053246313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060672784,0.00011699424,0.00006095866,0.00049574266,0.00024561278,0.0002445175,0.000102462494,0.00019128592,0.0010584109],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022891703,0.000038015736,0.0126172025,0.000006675466,0.000017870118,0.000061073464,0.004880698,0.0000759571,0.00036100802,0.96964765,0.0103976745,0.0018732804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083006575,0.00013604011,0.011906986,0.00019868577,0.00003077316,0.0000013687279,0.014966891,0.000081698745,0.00028194132,0.120864816,0.8499859,0.00071484334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015905574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0306042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84878284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016253059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002593953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112527949","doi":"10.7202/1078557ar","title":"Le droit européen des droits de la personne et la Cour suprême du Canada : une perspective canadienne","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009259665916658057,"score_gpt":0.24863151720800214,"score_spread":0.23937185129134408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112527949","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40639976,0.002851617,0.00024397699,0.04885744,0.0010920067,0.000093890354,0.00043282335,0.00003398787,0.5399945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796041,0.0020635482,0.00023158356,0.0013870602,0.0013437155,0.000025119603,0.000039225495,0.000027092688,0.015278502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975823,0.0005346964,0.00030174808,0.000468203,0.0004481283,0.00066489214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99770296,0.0007537072,0.00014443818,0.00013336378,0.00088808016,0.00037743995],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007799619,0.0002362095,0.0003115484,0.00007285381,0.0007574393,0.00015862167,0.00044960732,0.00016319967,0.00042591666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014946973,0.0003312867,0.00018468816,0.0005122824,0.00131001,0.00026068834,0.000105175764,0.0004168565,0.00002816762],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025401752,0.0002056797,0.0047151553,0.000020502139,0.00035535378,0.00218557,0.015604135,0.00031537545,0.00006690366,0.97306794,0.0015382804,0.0018997161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048081775,0.000029874544,0.038860284,0.00026446307,0.00010496208,0.001108899,0.029241728,0.00041231097,0.00003668651,0.32889053,0.6001442,0.0004252195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99770653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99918807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6441774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053365687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01782825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114618888","doi":"","title":"Judicial Independence and Judicial Place of Residence: A Tale of Two (or more) Cities?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial independence; Law; Judicial discretion; Political science; Prerogative; Judicial review; Judicial activism; Separation of powers; Veto; Independence (probability theory); Supreme court; Democracy; Constitutional law; Legislature; Politics","score_opus":0.05417441884891131,"score_gpt":0.3242715104905331,"score_spread":0.27009709164162177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3114618888","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08582707,0.34203333,0.000023156199,0.38906357,0.0004937933,0.0025558325,0.0003406994,0.000054127337,0.17960842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96184283,0.031851146,0.00002228917,0.005923354,0.000253796,0.000011250104,0.0000010551383,0.0000039315573,0.00009036215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988167,0.00015358615,0.00026134678,0.00013840587,0.0004103917,0.00021955761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992795,0.00012917654,0.00013111187,0.000091357324,0.00014406379,0.00022477805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065562845,0.000085129825,0.0003279123,0.000025733863,0.00053514185,0.000012687193,0.00029563243,0.00004225536,0.0003517933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010206229,0.00006110372,0.000055802302,0.00038392888,0.0015771725,0.00007331029,0.000051844512,0.00012669485,0.000014688827],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057471174,0.000011102917,0.0045787864,0.00063015404,0.00008259608,0.0000413512,0.014550466,0.000004756174,0.000026151725,0.9411424,0.024475485,0.014399316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011033091,0.0003643854,0.022810126,0.0107100615,0.0007609398,0.000024484352,0.011267756,0.00002354922,0.00012368333,0.054085046,0.89778113,0.0009455286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.62259734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79069185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8870573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007078655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022433712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5811158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114829951","doi":"10.4000/revus.6662","title":"Post-sovereign constitution-making and stages of representation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revus","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Sovereignty; Representation (politics); Democracy; Epistemology; Dimension (graph theory); Sociology; Sequence (biology); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Mathematics; Philosophy; Politics; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.0515394455113315,"score_gpt":0.3340113038505772,"score_spread":0.2824718583392457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3114829951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32871363,0.0037551143,0.00066858035,0.014579008,0.00020440295,0.0003028086,0.000049140865,0.00007453127,0.6516528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990491,0.0003613058,0.00013407916,0.00030039618,0.00012598441,0.0000016898236,0.0000010544937,8.050501e-7,0.000025561554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959314,0.000037439113,0.000086227,0.00008502959,0.00013122025,0.000066933644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99974495,0.000075831726,0.000045666115,0.000024152598,0.00007672951,0.000032657652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000078841986,0.000030778163,0.00008028411,0.000011152952,0.00023202322,0.000012111468,0.00003849952,0.000020303964,0.00005412439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048813343,0.000029570763,0.000020297719,0.00010803842,0.000446436,0.000085955966,0.000024979372,0.00002786945,0.00000760057],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010241547,0.000005340095,0.027354786,0.0000074360523,0.00001269284,0.0000032094295,0.0025961935,0.0000061130563,0.00047133496,0.9652868,0.00011183094,0.004134004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022143866,0.00059192284,0.2706356,0.000696179,0.00036624464,0.000015563573,0.107406974,0.00014181761,0.0032849244,0.30610573,0.30719784,0.0013428045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013076696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016118314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6703355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011651636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008430031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19768138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114913787","doi":"","title":"Alex M. Cameron, Power Without Law. The Supreme Courtof Canada, .the Marshall Decisions, and the Failure ofJudicial Activism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.012217173374166387,"score_gpt":0.252947511472747,"score_spread":0.24073033809858063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3114913787","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46974656,0.0018771663,0.0000961225,0.2597215,0.0035857449,0.0007030555,0.000068005626,0.000044986857,0.26415685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920204,0.00028472938,0.000039991763,0.0059323492,0.001474705,0.000010271839,7.8498596e-7,0.000010393361,0.00022635121],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977221,0.0003510748,0.00027867663,0.00017306092,0.0010201423,0.00045496886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829173,0.0008875669,0.00019265543,0.00020873144,0.00025302818,0.0001662722],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018729208,0.0001666154,0.0002353718,0.0000142145145,0.009143022,0.00034888502,0.0006885608,0.00009177671,0.0002500647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040884904,0.000075832075,0.00009950608,0.00014554521,0.0044539473,0.00018739354,0.00015855859,0.0010161841,0.000010322673],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008106588,0.000020056126,0.001477648,4.0205936e-7,0.00010657299,0.00002019588,0.0042967293,0.0000028650816,0.000044530803,0.96810603,0.024281258,0.0015626553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006247705,0.000016688855,0.00713412,0.00002045447,0.00007512739,0.00012599955,0.007554187,0.000006193756,0.0000106310235,0.058249407,0.9260283,0.00015408486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8141506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9098566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006853942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082893553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114989545","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3483299","title":"Not Just the Luck of the Draw? Exploring Competency of Counsel in Federal Court Refugee Leave Determinations (2005-2010)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Toronto; Royal Ontario Museum; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Refugee; Law; Political science; Criminology; Psychology; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03101338471336539,"score_gpt":0.27972215918150484,"score_spread":0.24870877446813944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3114989545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98112327,0.0011411667,0.00006135907,0.006704031,0.00067895465,0.00020065607,0.0000040709756,0.0000063547345,0.010080136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99614406,0.0027748966,0.000009012667,0.000076913886,0.00019594208,0.0000071583754,2.499384e-7,0.000004481465,0.0007873009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806523,0.00016392108,0.00030502956,0.000098341465,0.00051703956,0.0008504373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931985,0.00015308555,0.00022600067,0.000107566615,0.00016616196,0.000027333046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001745417,0.00008346228,0.00017501728,0.000050337076,0.0008105558,0.000025150244,0.0004188832,0.00004236403,0.000032213597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000120619545,0.00005183585,0.00011482066,0.00023924709,0.0004902819,0.00018314554,0.00004532475,0.00073754,0.000009588255],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002966941,0.000053117306,0.03495091,0.0000033649271,0.0000546932,4.642075e-7,0.0041364604,0.00005719739,0.00030806757,0.95843375,0.000048992617,0.001923323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014000447,0.00029570985,0.27755928,0.000259091,0.00008472844,0.0000570256,0.10537027,0.00006237009,0.00040693517,0.5977247,0.016405607,0.00037423466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028344574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06839501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36070904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004767837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030357488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94860435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3117282740","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3754588","title":"Justice(s) Out of Office: Principles for Former Judges","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; Kelowna General Hospital; Thompson Rivers University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.06745637639631191,"score_gpt":0.33107349313314816,"score_spread":0.26361711673683624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3117282740","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35599822,0.03237501,0.09890782,0.14295945,0.0031164708,0.0018751379,0.00007980813,0.00023803627,0.36445004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943583,0.0033838635,0.00012485187,0.0003509833,0.0011839512,0.000006299496,0.000001212538,0.000005409619,0.0005851121],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838346,0.000037574213,0.00021750132,0.00010415237,0.00026796482,0.0009893624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945295,0.000101343016,0.00014323235,0.000032601845,0.00018674956,0.00008310867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086608395,0.00007331257,0.00015554189,0.00002360698,0.0007408882,0.000021499833,0.00020994493,0.000045191453,0.000028992372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006239428,0.00006204099,0.00012036925,0.00010969012,0.00022985507,0.00012179898,0.000026921702,0.0003411922,0.00001791361],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007458006,0.000022739901,0.0008010392,0.000008547142,0.000101280406,3.000602e-7,0.0024836217,0.000015245527,0.000098346936,0.9911289,0.0005211469,0.004744201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078100397,0.00049799844,0.0008029289,0.000022408098,0.0002652683,0.0000049045007,0.051687226,0.000028992614,0.0001242608,0.4932495,0.4523022,0.0002333126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015385191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004254152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6383601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022153392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031165248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56983876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3119060674","doi":"","title":"Canada’s Unwritten Constitutional Order: Conventions and Structural Analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Normative; Order (exchange); Law; Political science; State (computer science); Power (physics); Law and economics; Constitutional law; Constitutional economics; Constitutional theory; Sociology; Computer science; Economics; Physics","score_opus":0.034959858699764784,"score_gpt":0.27914292417899644,"score_spread":0.24418306547923166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3119060674","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00068854913,0.094863914,0.000034848093,0.8187479,0.00012519502,0.0004078211,0.00028670084,0.000018297986,0.08482678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9595167,0.00938878,0.000015711756,0.03080728,0.00012668388,0.000008545212,0.000019286648,0.0000014032167,0.00011558305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992255,0.00010319808,0.00013251633,0.0001205048,0.00022128683,0.00019696784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993691,0.000044671488,0.000036597292,0.000061081104,0.000126268,0.00036232182],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019176585,0.00006802906,0.0001876351,0.000019876114,0.0018568669,0.00003462154,0.00015585471,0.000019939836,0.0010474208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003128402,0.00005009703,0.000056808796,0.00060879264,0.0012202887,0.000042328116,0.000019767513,0.00008337208,0.000021332224],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.9058114e-7,3.961685e-7,0.0033882712,0.000018794914,0.00016233264,0.0000063633047,0.00013409772,0.000004965619,6.2474406e-8,0.97113067,0.023918826,0.0012348156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000323493,0.0000021799158,0.0089879,0.000048043854,0.00037392447,0.0000014825605,0.00022809491,0.000013143966,4.820532e-8,0.001306356,0.9889268,0.00007965348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9970519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9698243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020353645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007657443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3119233148","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3699740","title":"‘A Constitution Similar in Principle to that of the United Kingdom’: The Preamble, Constitutional Principles, and a Sustainable Jurisprudence","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Preamble; Constitution; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Kingdom; Engineering; Biology","score_opus":0.04376646627950409,"score_gpt":0.30076562198947965,"score_spread":0.25699915570997556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3119233148","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9003469,0.003090069,0.0072754794,0.067415535,0.0002499984,0.0012223127,0.0000109327475,0.0000373902,0.02035141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976503,0.001247703,0.000024917776,0.0007722624,0.00014788103,0.000012358822,6.30618e-7,0.0000024830385,0.00014143411],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977268,0.00023784238,0.00024377089,0.00016507172,0.00050432526,0.0011222165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934065,0.00013257506,0.00014624563,0.00008208746,0.00019973006,0.00009869052],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021087138,0.000108402346,0.0001555791,0.00006788398,0.0015757035,0.000056367546,0.00039617476,0.00005628058,0.00001053727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009862119,0.00006814431,0.00006033843,0.0008350683,0.0021032945,0.0001773604,0.00020851145,0.00074955914,0.0000028567176],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004559948,0.000021767213,0.036050037,0.000004580188,0.000032808748,0.0000032001797,0.0012585245,0.0007051053,0.000027785487,0.961695,0.00004983047,0.000105759915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011449077,0.00022124802,0.030608948,0.00016980132,0.00008848054,0.00010124382,0.03841369,0.00013487264,0.00016855939,0.3249315,0.603655,0.00036175098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042461306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006800802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6367635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005859411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006186329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3119648700","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3569","title":"Whipping Up a Storm: Trying to Make Sense of Constitutional Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Law; Supreme court; Politics; Democratic legitimacy; Political science; Fidelity; Law and economics; Democracy; Constraint (computer-aided design); Sociology; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.06578480201170718,"score_gpt":0.30457141331327964,"score_spread":0.23878661130157247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3119648700","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0076161637,0.00051987177,0.0035943892,0.015433787,0.00083295023,0.00014515851,0.000027322436,0.000044649438,0.9717857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944463,0.000067925655,0.0008026041,0.0036096373,0.0010119264,0.0000030046365,0.00000107462,0.000004346845,0.000053186865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984735,0.00011711415,0.0003157164,0.00016051915,0.0006188609,0.0003142416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991029,0.00008724853,0.00013275404,0.000051142797,0.00027569788,0.0003502574],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045075474,0.00011105608,0.00023410267,0.000028053382,0.0020616872,0.00008930645,0.00017093706,0.00006316392,0.00020183287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022308205,0.00010484067,0.00012536928,0.00021816535,0.0014085992,0.00018135642,0.00007587818,0.00024762558,0.00006342121],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047337773,0.000021091493,0.0003468126,0.000005083672,0.000055697117,0.000043174263,0.0035085008,0.00014076603,0.0005397624,0.9941298,0.00042965892,0.00073235296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001478706,0.00022347576,0.0006227677,0.00039329426,0.00013153676,0.000201332,0.016329262,0.00004122767,0.00078738295,0.2610457,0.7180761,0.0006692032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03575119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11596518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9868301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009851313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003272296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3119731913","doi":"10.4324/9780203126653-10","title":"The Canadian Charter, substantive equality and social rights","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Social equality; Social rights; Sociology; Law; Human rights","score_opus":0.0650157245723419,"score_gpt":0.29322477872038555,"score_spread":0.22820905414804366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3119731913","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000046314803,0.0021636894,0.0000013731251,0.00617627,0.00038803072,0.00015656941,0.00005032327,0.000021719585,0.9909957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5621775,0.000722701,0.0000025954298,0.00040307295,0.0014830955,0.00000578246,0.0000071890468,0.000005379274,0.4351927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999057,0.000035867844,0.00012295549,0.00013910109,0.00031385044,0.00033124333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995251,0.000100691585,0.000063345506,0.00004981272,0.00012298526,0.00013802448],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044180255,0.00012557754,0.00015593463,0.000025952027,0.007743166,0.0000953099,0.00012504449,0.00020544045,0.00045362252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009595788,0.000082205035,0.00006328655,0.00001543195,0.0020909866,0.000062684914,0.00003175348,0.00016465037,0.0001638524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020144362,0.0000012470363,0.000041946732,6.831116e-7,0.000045077362,0.0000011511972,0.0031558499,3.2961395e-10,4.2617017e-8,0.990447,0.0027500708,0.003554912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022211454,0.0000021446417,0.00043021733,0.000003936046,0.000018045106,1.422828e-7,0.00030032874,1.4521493e-8,1.4679942e-7,0.30587202,0.693256,0.00009479655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7608468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9962904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6905059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022092932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048503748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99354863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121173077","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004689","title":"A Reply to Critics of <i>Constitutional Goods</i>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Constitutional law; Politics; Art history; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Classics; Art","score_opus":0.026748426982610384,"score_gpt":0.3073624706739275,"score_spread":0.28061404369131715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121173077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.069299676,0.0062332707,0.0030717007,0.100787826,0.0024149732,0.00034570653,0.00011857325,0.000022705954,0.8177056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900201,0.00007041733,0.0008253799,0.008572246,0.00043279614,6.652633e-7,2.626867e-7,0.0000017133686,0.000076405784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987588,0.00005488798,0.00036126008,0.00009880884,0.00041963914,0.00030659855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984795,0.00008089646,0.00013549464,0.00008341654,0.00055690954,0.00066376774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005430383,0.000079677586,0.00020486276,0.000103482365,0.0006365574,0.000045379926,0.0003584997,0.000046793146,0.00008141012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005602823,0.0000782639,0.000099965575,0.00028610832,0.0017707577,0.00022714594,0.000008311649,0.0001400491,0.000015122608],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008025409,0.000014008058,0.0010858244,0.0000016115616,0.0000124852,0.00009022139,0.0014373126,0.000043588578,0.00006920874,0.9910313,0.005403428,0.0008030099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013529186,0.00016911612,0.004592001,0.00020791362,0.00002988935,0.000049717706,0.000653985,3.7393738e-7,0.000207124,0.079782404,0.914031,0.00014112718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058253586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08733769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92072046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018299875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004006994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9480176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121227752","doi":"10.25192/issn.1982-0496.rdfd.v25i31874","title":"CANADIAN LIVING TREE DOCTRINE OF CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Direitos Fundamentais & Democracia","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Constitution; Doctrine; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional interpretation; Metaphor; Constitutional law; Law; Objectivity (philosophy); Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.02341220341272064,"score_gpt":0.2873373079858172,"score_spread":0.26392510457309654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121227752","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13112637,0.005737973,0.0041005444,0.031814627,0.000765186,0.0011604792,0.00027273002,0.00023665035,0.8247854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99781877,0.00027263496,0.00018719857,0.0011985608,0.00036895214,0.000014543526,0.000015001179,0.0000049287355,0.0001194182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852955,0.00013060617,0.00035520812,0.00024139028,0.0004235307,0.0003197192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999107,0.00015765804,0.00014260941,0.00008159006,0.00016494897,0.0003461838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028673088,0.00013347736,0.00027069382,0.00007979022,0.00077358313,0.000089641304,0.0002249602,0.000059830065,0.00073733507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007323952,0.00013858743,0.000119981734,0.0004209288,0.0010001843,0.00021636156,0.000057265803,0.000113979244,0.00011903628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026606385,0.00003077025,0.080428965,0.000027655113,0.000089671084,0.000011798776,0.0030922268,0.000011106392,0.0002535232,0.89984334,0.0023063337,0.013878026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037228258,0.00012318786,0.02885324,0.00045353186,0.00016596953,0.0000038935805,0.0047028763,0.00021168089,0.00015632951,0.0038636727,0.96054167,0.0005516877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06317523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054902352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9582353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003307827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009866641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9623432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121255575","doi":"","title":"The Increasing Irrelevance of Section 1 of the Charter","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Deference; Adjudication; Law; Political science; Section (typography); Standard of review; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Sociology; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.0486803144265786,"score_gpt":0.30907395060998705,"score_spread":0.26039363618340844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121255575","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10017108,0.1945845,0.001876492,0.07830005,0.0053781806,0.0042814068,0.0011448464,0.00017454225,0.6140889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9684143,0.030123603,0.000015414595,0.00086569565,0.0003278718,0.00004226316,0.0000050741337,0.0000038529,0.00020190857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730146,0.0006764007,0.00056161155,0.00022704707,0.00090139173,0.0003320842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967675,0.0011240152,0.00039286364,0.00035417313,0.0012951934,0.0000662412],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018418352,0.00018702644,0.0003451355,0.000017272574,0.0027602352,0.000040535466,0.00070877804,0.00006806741,0.00014708673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014474096,0.00009831805,0.00023385724,0.00043013372,0.013681027,0.00027840567,0.00017756641,0.00025797088,0.00001689101],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005461942,0.00003727904,0.0011772088,0.00004236468,0.000060450435,0.0000029679545,0.00029795265,0.000012546757,0.000080454265,0.99583375,0.0015438597,0.00085651415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023067105,0.000064159685,0.0037708615,0.0019576105,0.00021800038,0.00016249441,0.0018188795,0.00001729086,0.00010645656,0.0316483,0.95974535,0.00025990265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016363947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014729475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9641855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000082563245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009851482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121267013","doi":"","title":"Law's Expression: The Promise and Perils of Judicial Opinion Writing in Canadian Constitutional Law","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Supreme court; Charter; Democracy; Judicial opinion; Expression (computer science); Judicial review; Function (biology); Constitutional law; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.02037336622644928,"score_gpt":0.2779223015099664,"score_spread":0.2575489352835171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121267013","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17493455,0.0024122747,0.000001941803,0.00454535,0.0003037081,0.00036061637,0.00005807827,0.000026264577,0.81735724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99771136,0.0002618764,0.000059197962,0.0012537617,0.00056954595,0.000031167783,0.0000052673713,0.0000030885699,0.0001047292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987489,0.00013534642,0.00024631,0.00019439831,0.00031603035,0.00035902642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946994,0.000110317036,0.0000458155,0.000088309396,0.00007113506,0.00021448427],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005597985,0.00009946334,0.00016889928,0.000024237435,0.0017839605,0.00007070189,0.00016770115,0.000089443514,0.00078316056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000084578365,0.00008106972,0.00004272027,0.00016311296,0.004059462,0.00024101236,0.000032851636,0.00017353756,0.00003413147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017529494,0.00001760072,0.004680376,0.000003868552,0.000006948733,0.000005436452,0.000781965,0.000011219369,0.00005112037,0.9935366,0.00027052872,0.00061683217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005101664,0.000026217995,0.007867618,0.00024716964,0.000009788826,0.000005537742,0.0020495248,0.000005059631,0.00014154273,0.056819964,0.9321036,0.00021385617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8279916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90176976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9367166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011573663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006547661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121292853","doi":"","title":"Charter Dialogue Revisited – Or Much Ado About Metaphors","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Phenomenon; Legislature; Supreme court; Legislation; Law; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03810004463575508,"score_gpt":0.31614191547791215,"score_spread":0.2780418708421571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121292853","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005574287,0.0020696484,0.00094630057,0.0024844115,0.0010100488,0.00014583107,0.000013129054,0.00006171332,0.9876946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943176,0.0010932361,0.00038147226,0.0012396451,0.0021329827,0.0000030923047,0.00000308009,0.000008816444,0.00082007126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813247,0.00014246319,0.00036702765,0.00017843978,0.0006215385,0.0005580634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990424,0.00015220096,0.00015954922,0.000093712864,0.00025678755,0.00029537902],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018543344,0.00014206275,0.0002547587,0.00006858791,0.0027103072,0.00016541954,0.00028229158,0.00010878883,0.0009670148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002220511,0.00010389036,0.00016447606,0.0002965782,0.00058096234,0.00029084925,0.000046039437,0.00033084958,0.00019666688],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007263726,0.000055487613,0.0015143536,0.000002670077,0.000088605666,0.00016045292,0.0017431349,7.0319925e-7,0.0000653402,0.9866121,0.0023538398,0.0073306877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008322512,0.00013044593,0.011929634,0.00017136427,0.00014494837,0.0001535802,0.0056802477,0.000002207819,0.00018081484,0.2194224,0.7608526,0.00049954717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047886807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37226066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9887433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001228724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001495428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121365754","doi":"","title":"Interventions at the Supreme Court of Canada: Accuracy, Affiliation, and Acceptance","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Appeal; Intervention (counseling); Law; Psychological intervention; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Parliament; Sociology; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.022249018008963086,"score_gpt":0.27074030754786554,"score_spread":0.24849128953890245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121365754","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8314431,0.0007783943,0.000054641467,0.015363928,0.00022978024,0.00010779772,0.000026812737,0.000008909749,0.15198669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963819,0.00030573146,0.00007223855,0.000016003634,0.000026072294,1.1713286e-7,9.403935e-7,7.992429e-7,0.0031962085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960715,0.000027600187,0.00004320881,0.00006677099,0.00017065008,0.00008461915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995926,0.00009203269,0.00008694599,0.00006771952,0.00012467455,0.00003605226],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015338857,0.00003427247,0.00007840476,0.000004736664,0.000736096,0.0000035550777,0.00015127448,0.00002535949,0.005300553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000113554976,0.000031982116,0.000041251722,0.000034046072,0.0006366042,0.00015534082,0.00009225773,0.000039555893,0.0000010979952],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014048288,0.0001569661,0.10248038,0.000079110265,0.00026007014,0.000005976618,0.102511846,0.000015370215,0.0025304817,0.68800753,0.06844887,0.035362907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015816,0.000011717787,0.92269826,0.000017068209,0.00003076042,2.6953632e-7,0.04763746,0.000005647414,0.00003112303,0.00029605284,0.029057156,0.000056338064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98667985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82021785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012190692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002736024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99560875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121370532","doi":"","title":"The Administrative Foundations of Self-Enforcing Constitutions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Administrative law; Rule of law; Law and economics; Constitutional law; Political science; Public law; Power (physics); Law; Economics; Politics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.037400080061204495,"score_gpt":0.322590394232025,"score_spread":0.2851903141708205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121370532","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21151802,0.010242795,0.015455167,0.016265424,0.0012528787,0.00048832246,0.000011643463,0.00012365829,0.7446421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834007,0.0154463295,0.000055359167,0.000027409862,0.00026545575,0.0000052725977,5.2744815e-7,0.0000019113206,0.0007970034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985167,0.00009394842,0.00020127986,0.000065644424,0.00029379124,0.00082867435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933374,0.00021494958,0.00012965228,0.000050798764,0.00022277137,0.000048071],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010077032,0.00005886264,0.00008898923,0.000030127796,0.006658688,0.000027232047,0.00018506493,0.000030781557,0.000015139039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027636313,0.000042029304,0.00008387427,0.00020427715,0.0014672576,0.00015886755,0.00001718869,0.00047624786,0.00001562263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058695755,0.000024089164,0.0018339088,2.142197e-7,0.00009510949,0.0000010865753,0.0017503796,0.000005448186,0.0000059049903,0.99544233,0.000093764116,0.0007419082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024498207,0.00011755429,0.0019006691,0.000012319298,0.000046431134,0.00018091136,0.040410586,0.00000470208,0.000020715279,0.8373587,0.11958855,0.000113854876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013663819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021068731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7718827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048229008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012324419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121456859","doi":"","title":"Does the Observer Have an Effect?: An Analysis of the Use of the Dialogue Metaphor in Canada's Courts","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Legislature; Charter; Normative; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03993620394470653,"score_gpt":0.276923128913568,"score_spread":0.23698692496886148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121456859","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98621464,0.00015871435,0.000017011826,0.0018606519,0.000550753,0.00016727888,0.00004159431,0.0000027589479,0.01098661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994357,0.000051025432,0.000018850644,0.0003224878,0.00013687574,0.0000019256079,8.956545e-7,0.0000032614128,0.000028958973],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978369,0.0007206494,0.00033032568,0.00010990045,0.0007435437,0.0002587185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879616,0.0004612196,0.00027481106,0.00021146904,0.00017277189,0.0000835479],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017846638,0.00009552653,0.00026652322,0.00003589386,0.0012031626,0.000047328755,0.0005615663,0.00004528024,0.000038574748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023372842,0.00003498567,0.0002103002,0.0004507533,0.00077529426,0.00018771931,0.00006973602,0.00024009711,1.5353959e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003943606,0.000066604975,0.7096362,0.0000018636661,0.00045038585,0.000008685877,0.002422828,0.0018402833,0.00009575929,0.28408504,0.0000491998,0.0013037178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015056935,0.00002431161,0.9840513,0.000025586267,0.00053296116,0.000001870556,0.0029471514,0.000083415885,0.00040931295,0.008844203,0.002843794,0.000085547166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9963174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27524084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021741516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052012823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92538756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121467949","doi":"","title":"From the MVR to Chaoulli v. Quebec: The Road Not Taken and the Future of Section 7","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Charter; Confusion; Economic Justice; Law; Law and economics; Limit (mathematics); Political science; Sociology; Business; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.011643503852175708,"score_gpt":0.2471956735442659,"score_spread":0.23555216969209017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121467949","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45898613,0.0024292343,0.00016768811,0.3432605,0.0009893687,0.00046129507,0.000018901388,0.000033089458,0.1936538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99278885,0.00013484822,0.000010204856,0.0017277565,0.003117646,0.000013666908,8.245331e-7,0.0000012063757,0.0022049965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994207,0.000105270956,0.0000859255,0.000079921185,0.00021673087,0.000091439564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996283,0.00020187865,0.00003318405,0.00007212452,0.00005156037,0.000012958946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003589853,0.000046103167,0.00007262876,0.00000515134,0.0010498229,0.000043178658,0.00014208363,0.000031054202,0.000074730364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003756953,0.000017185204,0.000037138,0.00013921883,0.0007734351,0.000041713614,0.000042200445,0.00005947584,0.000009674266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033736633,0.000009725964,0.001838656,2.8688416e-7,0.000021402595,1.274031e-7,0.010122816,0.000008256331,0.000041480194,0.9537513,0.020006405,0.014165756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023270269,0.000009104722,0.21444717,0.0000063047682,0.000027857186,2.23051e-7,0.043386374,0.00000635721,0.000059942446,0.05473204,0.68702495,0.000066947134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.76730675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.72919464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8990193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016563035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004651947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8074495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121490751","doi":"","title":"Sclerotization of the Judiciary: Judicial Exits from the U.S. Courts of Appeals are Politically Motivated","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Politics; Presidential system; Presidential election; Law; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.06744096425144024,"score_gpt":0.3470883783276678,"score_spread":0.27964741407622756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121490751","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72839916,0.00042901404,0.0000036011681,0.009139734,0.0009251146,0.0011773937,0.00044212458,0.000018439805,0.25946543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936005,0.0054707336,0.000020317058,0.00009402708,0.00064255553,0.000047398848,0.000016064205,0.000013426544,0.000094971845],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971529,0.0006898918,0.00058031036,0.000416815,0.00066029036,0.00049976713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970788,0.0010291318,0.000621125,0.0006899931,0.0004939013,0.00008707199],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021614805,0.00017172797,0.0005122476,0.000087846485,0.0012035032,0.000079513986,0.0014829458,0.00032648185,0.00005041995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044569816,0.00012591125,0.0001906354,0.00012006756,0.004535,0.00007198914,0.0012866014,0.0007835108,0.0000031784084],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024023144,0.0005061385,0.47062552,0.000085416475,0.00072734855,0.000009311088,0.008614233,0.0028455702,0.00026317805,0.45994002,0.0010431603,0.05509988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031621428,0.000026793075,0.67362905,0.0011230629,0.0000336404,1.9220502e-7,0.004137438,0.00009971042,0.00017141101,0.3155141,0.0047289543,0.00021945534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04863851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023313176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26520136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039869352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019437773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121492944","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2993","title":"Formal versus Functional Method in Comparative Constitutional Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Comparative law; Public law; Constitutional law; Supreme court; Political science; Jurisprudence; Municipal law; Common law","score_opus":0.11159816403449356,"score_gpt":0.36442469710557523,"score_spread":0.25282653307108166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121492944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00070843677,0.00029513414,0.020612765,0.0036795915,0.0014472958,0.000090705355,0.000022171456,0.000026695205,0.97311723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968454,0.000087412365,0.001572498,0.0003398734,0.0009384318,0.000010274761,0.0000019476054,0.00000271434,0.00020141515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982485,0.0002472246,0.0002914494,0.00016906434,0.0006025535,0.00044119556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894655,0.0004893019,0.000112038935,0.00005282101,0.00023010377,0.00016920715],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009979111,0.00012446723,0.00021236688,0.000050841758,0.0023508172,0.00007548179,0.00016895647,0.000083870254,0.0008951307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008770265,0.00008751331,0.00011241596,0.00014279802,0.0026977314,0.0007994439,0.000055223063,0.0002276489,0.00017061431],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025059504,0.000059054437,0.00051697897,5.707005e-7,0.000059094255,0.000020943551,0.0003825602,0.00004542508,0.00006950548,0.99687976,0.0005260673,0.0011894254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034735799,0.000101751015,0.0023287185,0.000092634495,0.00003332713,0.00007475629,0.0022410415,0.00000811719,0.00013069678,0.74061084,0.2506028,0.0003017195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027487408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3519423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.996137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032707595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040642664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121581988","doi":"","title":"Constitutional, Remedial, and International Dialogues about Rights: The Canadian Experience","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas international law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legislature; Supreme court; Scholarship; Conversation; Political science; Judicial opinion; Sociology; Judicial activism; Judicial review; Globalization; Constitution","score_opus":0.04266739919851232,"score_gpt":0.31727766371422883,"score_spread":0.2746102645157165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121581988","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012521041,0.00087440596,0.0001535786,0.068735264,0.004468094,0.00012643535,0.000043295335,0.00003521183,0.91304266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895589,0.00082535343,0.0003260583,0.003020781,0.0051818015,0.000009813372,0.000010860053,0.0000029424368,0.0010635126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836427,0.00008446655,0.00029855277,0.00017620834,0.0007723281,0.00030416777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989009,0.00015377016,0.00012391727,0.00006896932,0.00048611034,0.00026631582],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006375834,0.00012151642,0.00010897673,0.00007607629,0.0043400223,0.0005373939,0.0006462204,0.000075315256,0.001362013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031462303,0.000088431094,0.00007262553,0.00009101973,0.0045180754,0.00065058173,0.0000765799,0.00030767662,0.00014792978],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011389658,0.000020245803,0.0066570435,1.4992973e-7,0.00007081889,0.000014087391,0.00170607,0.00001757889,0.0000030796464,0.98566854,0.0031468302,0.0026841913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020896332,0.0000073232554,0.0050458224,0.000025087387,0.000009727624,0.00010563135,0.00057707774,0.000020696563,0.000011308411,0.06179754,0.93207204,0.00011878149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20226452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89788353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97703785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005891403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004358308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121624313","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3043190","title":"Judging Constitutional Conventions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.027218476617602978,"score_gpt":0.32164257720152145,"score_spread":0.2944241005839185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121624313","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06849872,0.00465189,0.024897434,0.03585219,0.0027557975,0.00022284336,0.000009908277,0.000097878285,0.8630133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926164,0.0036973702,0.00003123585,0.000096061056,0.0010279914,0.0000038563926,8.425218e-7,0.0000024214035,0.0025238213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808174,0.0000559879,0.000139446,0.00010677416,0.00032998918,0.0012860849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948096,0.000034230532,0.0001540618,0.00009782722,0.0001504204,0.00008251499],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015424349,0.00007054912,0.00010084039,0.000042433574,0.010367309,0.00022953683,0.0003761679,0.00004541513,0.00012038327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044099582,0.00006620395,0.00010753878,0.000042499487,0.0025003876,0.00038254564,0.0000487624,0.0006599792,0.000115853276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051135385,0.000019049772,0.011985097,2.657055e-7,0.00006714635,0.000003136596,0.00014351666,0.0000020266714,0.000008862726,0.98296165,0.0001542682,0.0046498883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002453452,0.000018464525,0.0041720895,0.000015102915,0.000022671744,0.000047475267,0.0033132168,0.0000017532572,0.0000028068598,0.90554756,0.08651777,0.0000957159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021017278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013372516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9241177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005928191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005509449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9909211},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121631039","doi":"","title":"Electoral Cycles Among U.S. Courts of Appeals Judges","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Toulouse Capitole Publications (University Toulouse 1 Capitole)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Impartiality; Ideology; Political science; Law; Presidential system; Presidential election; Quarter (Canadian coin); Priming (agriculture); Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.02752323547200709,"score_gpt":0.2707190911384171,"score_spread":0.24319585566641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121631039","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86333466,0.0023962935,0.0013056624,0.021850342,0.0015377072,0.0017301178,0.0012477962,0.0011623487,0.10543506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989213,0.0023406015,0.00035117642,0.0001301737,0.0010392645,0.00004115533,0.000187772,0.000055100183,0.0066417377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954028,0.0005363377,0.0006498986,0.0011332928,0.0012554728,0.0010221805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99522305,0.00036698813,0.0009825203,0.0011879147,0.0016729031,0.00056665577],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076966657,0.00059574586,0.0009941409,0.0009904252,0.0021298968,0.0002226604,0.00212415,0.0008845517,0.000713649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048328293,0.0006481225,0.000583848,0.00092927157,0.003384236,0.00086667325,0.00138263,0.000740332,0.00021595729],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008901535,0.0007559935,0.08465359,0.00014621875,0.00088312256,0.00003614785,0.012953737,0.00008903894,0.00020910626,0.800805,0.094730295,0.0046487646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024879498,0.00016410642,0.21929057,0.00092229474,0.0013180797,0.0000110599585,0.029974723,0.000094535266,0.00067152065,0.16857047,0.57259953,0.003895165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026996398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020300258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6322345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001055349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024662223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121660356","doi":"","title":"Equal Autonomy in Canadian Federalism: The Continuing Search for Balance in the Interpretation of the Division of Powers","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Parliament; Constitution; Federalism; Political science; Autonomy; Jurisdiction; Jurisprudence; Separation of powers; Enumerated powers; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Balance (ability); Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.020930806869085335,"score_gpt":0.287236034381105,"score_spread":0.2663052275120197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121660356","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97815806,0.0011132754,0.00091550394,0.0052812845,0.0001653192,0.000353067,0.0000034564591,0.0000017277616,0.014008312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996456,0.00019035552,0.000005279889,0.00008542063,0.00003629005,0.0000062103018,2.0660593e-7,0.000001599137,0.000029049117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873275,0.00022598314,0.00017258388,0.000052928834,0.00018922253,0.0006265406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963576,0.00014468555,0.000083956205,0.000044804758,0.000073045994,0.00001778121],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034651898,0.000039985538,0.00008084647,0.00004299431,0.00031546198,0.000015367603,0.0003386055,0.000025602101,0.000006374064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001494847,0.000020775635,0.000055311808,0.00019360926,0.0002702539,0.00007555742,0.000015968268,0.0003736397,3.0520997e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021814598,0.000012980068,0.063113675,0.0000011010933,0.00001441031,1.8349778e-7,0.06245354,0.000027701413,0.000014382093,0.8677761,0.000006322312,0.006557815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006031959,0.0001784975,0.2068873,0.00017462944,0.000018954672,0.000005611215,0.20342979,0.00037034793,0.00008213193,0.5861447,0.0019875516,0.00011727314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4942136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9363777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4421641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005134389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029364985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52092224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121721822","doi":"10.1080/20508840.2015.1041704.45","title":"On Statutory Interpretation and the (Canadian) Rule of Law: Interpretive Presumptions as Boundary Setting","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Fondation pour la recherche juridique","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Law; Philosophy of law; Jurisprudence; Statutory law; Public law; Rule of law; Comparative law; Boilerplate text; Private law; Common law; Political science; Black letter law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01705135909295512,"score_gpt":0.2729327685446145,"score_spread":0.2558814094516594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121721822","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11000524,0.00067316054,0.00011187524,0.003248384,0.00011606229,0.00012400007,0.000017727169,0.000011538421,0.885692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99906754,0.00008737366,0.000115885225,0.00009792933,0.000016656373,2.5742412e-7,0.0000012994558,0.000001270657,0.00061180186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994844,0.0001235683,0.000042542404,0.0000787234,0.0001766286,0.00009412519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999507,0.00015817217,0.00006802566,0.000051928648,0.0001335557,0.00008131902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031671798,0.000042924265,0.000097196935,0.000016165342,0.0006748406,0.000013428809,0.000110351044,0.00003530418,0.00042188427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016660526,0.00004009746,0.000036451398,0.000024049214,0.001851382,0.00025308883,0.000047931975,0.000050332448,0.0000085307365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017661479,0.000010357928,0.00018105401,0.00000242532,0.000033430057,0.0000010388318,0.20169175,0.00000809588,0.0000056212793,0.7948435,0.0003702599,0.0026758807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002014567,0.00035142477,0.13803357,0.0003321622,0.0001950445,0.0000016196166,0.7067154,0.00026302272,0.000012031505,0.12079094,0.030962728,0.0003275006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9748314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9808878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8890623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036793726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044192927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6821494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121765147","doi":"10.1093/jrls/jlaa002","title":"Legislated Rights in the real world","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Legislation; Adjudication; Law; Political science; Legislature; Argument (complex analysis); Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0890259935829956,"score_gpt":0.3838872765834966,"score_spread":0.29486128300050096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121765147","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047708643,0.32475257,0.00000149556,0.09834116,0.00019194592,0.0006187916,0.000008510074,0.00004407837,0.5712706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75779426,0.23616232,0.000046120484,0.005251161,0.0004559497,0.000049770486,0.0000016930684,0.0000026766809,0.00023605327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841857,0.0003083537,0.00039575103,0.00016939965,0.0004925057,0.00021540523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992885,0.00028829733,0.00013415299,0.000085448766,0.00016373921,0.000039886974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008479685,0.00011472374,0.00045914407,0.000027290569,0.00047925374,0.000014535091,0.0003070955,0.000020034167,0.000046950336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005250489,0.00006734055,0.00012029043,0.0009742995,0.00076519063,0.00012890477,0.00007693081,0.0001414166,0.000041972773],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009887729,0.0000380529,0.0031700903,0.00047416677,0.000098618075,0.000025043839,0.0068693664,4.852894e-7,0.000002099565,0.9516787,0.035637368,0.001996154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000100749014,0.000031486357,0.0035083918,0.001498926,0.000051620693,2.1496434e-7,0.0017316543,2.9994635e-7,0.0000030133483,0.0045060203,0.9884715,0.000096107506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014812004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026511343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9528341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047352572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009782775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99174845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121814501","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1161","title":"Policy Preference Change and Appointments to the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Discretion; Preference; Political science; Prime minister; Law; Politics; Prime (order theory); Economics","score_opus":0.06908001797112422,"score_gpt":0.2897506825737815,"score_spread":0.22067066460265727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121814501","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020085957,0.0006272942,0.0000506741,0.11265534,0.00026617083,0.00022036898,0.000020874477,0.000008383128,0.86606497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99621964,0.0002804679,0.000049973427,0.0027613898,0.0005761605,0.0000028946984,2.3057092e-7,0.000001348293,0.00010791818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991598,0.000056532168,0.00011845848,0.0000693002,0.0003789737,0.0002169248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996345,0.00002887933,0.00004471514,0.000047217276,0.00010662084,0.00013803705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002849028,0.0000576084,0.00009729488,0.00001729326,0.0011696981,0.000037339927,0.00017066213,0.000020449696,0.000025082569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000738603,0.00003871162,0.000020877302,0.00010944007,0.00015417887,0.00008789062,0.000029270937,0.000088173896,0.0000019306426],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000088076085,0.000014684863,0.000760019,6.826014e-7,0.000013957956,0.0000033889962,0.0017072993,0.0000020397938,0.000011576456,0.99117076,0.0016209014,0.0046859058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044433385,0.00024049175,0.14354552,0.00013166,0.000039665956,0.00003997432,0.004236986,0.0000043337973,0.00010308505,0.6962203,0.15473054,0.00026312695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9601881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99249643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97613364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009648112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043506845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8996491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121890113","doi":"10.1111/1467-9337.00208","title":"Judicial Hegemony: Dworkin’s <i>Freedom’s Law</i> and the Spectrum of Constitutional Democracies","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Democracy; Political science; Constitutional law; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.02104602275551616,"score_gpt":0.2454582728427759,"score_spread":0.22441225008725973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121890113","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009377309,0.006306028,0.0007327052,0.046672992,0.000694787,0.00038834923,0.000032883807,0.00006043764,0.9357345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961158,0.0017901241,0.000080728365,0.000971087,0.0006900541,0.0000161087,0.0000012076724,0.0000021817011,0.00033270926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898314,0.000112843605,0.000203544,0.00013544956,0.00037146223,0.00019356387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994537,0.00025988184,0.00008625186,0.00007812266,0.00007377815,0.000048251935],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003585916,0.000087513596,0.00018969997,0.000024823124,0.0014909006,0.000046834906,0.00013217804,0.000052001906,0.0002437851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001415415,0.000063356594,0.000069394766,0.00018007851,0.010803417,0.00013328902,0.000051778658,0.00008784373,0.000038822745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021146558,0.000024922656,0.001160545,0.0000017513496,0.00003779842,0.0000017410015,0.001972767,0.000009815858,0.000010252587,0.9911709,0.005323057,0.0002653181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00156087,0.000045633835,0.002757285,0.00004159406,0.00011907118,0.000008713454,0.0018698565,0.0001621459,0.00016211988,0.3789606,0.61403066,0.00028145182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065385336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009934147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9867385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003140213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008698161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121892939","doi":"10.36644/mlr.114.7.constitutional","title":"Constitutional Avoidance as Interpretation and as Remedy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Michigan Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional interpretation; Law and economics; Epistemology; Positive economics; Political science; Economics; Law; Constitution; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01983119137489859,"score_gpt":0.316266567124098,"score_spread":0.2964353757491994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121892939","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014060417,0.18026261,0.0005299652,0.03926501,0.00046143995,0.0005468241,0.000017341179,0.00009529665,0.7647611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.917368,0.07486898,0.000056119283,0.0070336093,0.00014527373,0.000023808136,0.0000016910078,0.0000018206291,0.00050071016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919677,0.00010373848,0.00016759336,0.0001682893,0.00021768548,0.00014595159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995861,0.000119979806,0.000061148494,0.00006554144,0.00009307965,0.0000741699],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036888922,0.00007759362,0.00016467215,0.000007505388,0.00053947145,0.000019943325,0.000093598625,0.000030302397,0.00028807242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046513416,0.000051874507,0.000046011824,0.00009026001,0.0023795448,0.0001747959,0.000035428526,0.000042750005,0.00053131615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003867402,0.0000074629693,0.00018150151,0.00003381777,0.000012793327,0.0000024035376,0.00019178142,1.250831e-8,0.00007005758,0.98416173,0.00033385522,0.015000685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009029434,0.00001548362,0.00019533095,0.0023595486,0.00002757221,0.000008090162,0.000048913935,7.940979e-8,0.000034568013,0.07281196,0.9243111,0.00009705518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015007445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003675027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92397726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029040308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014408008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8767532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121914176","doi":"","title":"Through Which Glass Darkly? Constitutional Principle in Legality and Constitutionality Review","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Constitutionality; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Judicial review; Adjudication; Constitutional review; Common law; Constitution; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.041045752936972206,"score_gpt":0.3366855014808204,"score_spread":0.29563974854384817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121914176","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047682602,0.25681102,0.018544411,0.37134188,0.0008686896,0.0013198903,0.00007743903,0.00016379911,0.30319026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90415096,0.09210986,0.00007112639,0.0031789378,0.00042657228,0.000009720551,0.0000048158536,0.000002625063,0.00004540408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973054,0.00029894692,0.000397581,0.00027061632,0.00054999685,0.0011774421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933004,0.00009786876,0.00013643905,0.000056806046,0.00025336273,0.00012550739],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002606386,0.0001414419,0.00030044396,0.000023574876,0.0011064728,0.000054505283,0.00021327268,0.000073865645,0.00008241839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012845569,0.0001296591,0.000074851254,0.0005038536,0.002037698,0.00046786087,0.00007420168,0.0011348792,0.000028604636],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023138486,0.000035245073,0.014624389,0.000023265657,0.00005146712,0.0000051589914,0.00028600817,0.0000065450754,0.000005751465,0.9840665,0.0002886926,0.00058383076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000660801,0.000061962215,0.0040428825,0.00028563716,0.00005086417,0.00010449256,0.001724812,0.000006522501,0.000002916462,0.60285115,0.38994545,0.0002625165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001860793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014834312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8564683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076220173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010405787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99520427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122024307","doi":"","title":"Consequences for Broken Political Promises: Lawyer-Politicians and the Rules of Professional Conduct","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Professional conduct; Politics; Law; Political science; Legal ethics; Legal profession; Rule of law; Ballot; Law and economics; Sociology; Voting","score_opus":0.040312641239296565,"score_gpt":0.3249904711513873,"score_spread":0.28467782991209073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122024307","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5845878,0.0020492738,0.00014952924,0.1355883,0.0011327094,0.0019033359,0.0005724278,0.0001013929,0.27391523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99633235,0.00007255859,0.00019822149,0.0011532037,0.00046801957,0.00012814035,0.0000016167328,0.000004600828,0.0016413011],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868655,0.00020114412,0.00023112098,0.0001832582,0.00030152517,0.000396393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982438,0.0012319906,0.00007865769,0.00009012838,0.00020197473,0.00015344984],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000640137,0.000099020726,0.0002360812,0.000017460106,0.000936725,0.00003436605,0.00019779202,0.00007601723,0.00012205967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011316573,0.000049836504,0.00008063377,0.0000500137,0.008605304,0.00016582826,0.00006147951,0.00006763194,0.000023544302],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007574773,0.000027761544,0.0015871037,0.000010736825,0.000035236048,7.4582783e-7,0.0003918123,2.088858e-8,0.0003622423,0.99648446,0.00075699564,0.00026716763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012246498,0.000042186955,0.0015345602,0.00013171931,0.00003934367,0.000002116406,0.0032651757,3.3944272e-7,0.0009351521,0.90111744,0.09158412,0.00012317559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015204203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048624477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41174453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050685587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052123575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9940927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122127272","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1261","title":"The McLachlin Court and the Charter in 2012","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Unanimity; Commission","score_opus":0.029108986470560115,"score_gpt":0.29518634674801403,"score_spread":0.26607736027745393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122127272","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008482229,0.50828606,0.000007106363,0.2898182,0.00030379026,0.0012522242,0.0000027028223,0.000024268951,0.19945742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5877755,0.40077087,0.000010962829,0.009678828,0.00031348094,0.00027291683,0.0000010442964,0.00000469209,0.0011716577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988919,0.00028217907,0.00020594102,0.0001170121,0.00026051098,0.000242448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993574,0.0003220236,0.000049651,0.0001250428,0.00009825754,0.000047596874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015792138,0.000080999365,0.0002050138,0.0000055150495,0.0010275114,0.000075367316,0.0002180715,0.000029315383,0.00031519568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017323167,0.000038588172,0.000060681396,0.00011989591,0.0017309869,0.00017396486,0.00006221816,0.00011365929,0.0003172275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023085813,0.0000070188735,0.00033238326,0.000023178087,0.0000117490035,4.064881e-7,0.00030809216,2.3196154e-8,5.648739e-7,0.96432686,0.02874916,0.0062382394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014656543,0.0000035794435,0.0014635068,0.00031491905,0.00002058414,7.3353857e-7,0.00021605182,0.0000024150559,2.4262238e-7,0.04169262,0.9560767,0.00006209144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012756334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0191538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9273275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025687874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005740759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122212514","doi":"10.1017/s2045381711000037","title":"Comparative, global and transnational constitutionalism: The emergence of a transnational legal-pluralist order","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Constitutionalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Political science; Comparative law; Tort; Law and economics; Legal pluralism; Context (archaeology); Constitutional law; Law; Private law; Sociology; Legal realism; Democracy; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.045701480162140776,"score_gpt":0.3424627571035268,"score_spread":0.29676127694138604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122212514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13912717,0.008709398,0.016721569,0.109571785,0.0036867668,0.0013440187,0.0067297346,0.00018264227,0.7139269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978434,0.00007274885,0.0007691637,0.000772789,0.0003356042,0.000048247864,0.000091714144,0.0000021258331,0.00006419212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735266,0.00023105631,0.00047334516,0.0002753955,0.0011845516,0.0004830062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846554,0.00021841288,0.00015353922,0.00011551544,0.0008200401,0.00022697769],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007223636,0.0002341188,0.00032046705,0.00003566042,0.0018231866,0.00006107001,0.00031316912,0.00012750781,0.00059002877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017024287,0.00019006486,0.00013707837,0.0008574732,0.0090544205,0.00070241,0.00005815023,0.00013671233,0.00001532137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036642577,0.00012701945,0.023308206,0.0000064693845,0.00013516421,0.0000018090152,0.0007149001,0.00011583868,0.000016036516,0.9735145,0.0019454652,0.000077933175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011300138,0.000027370788,0.17802733,0.000030605297,0.00020793367,0.00015678232,0.0045192107,0.00004416329,0.000021324324,0.24888575,0.5663703,0.0005791856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026529862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004668531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85871625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019685052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016964865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122261122","doi":"","title":"Waldron, Waluchow and the Merits of Constitutionalism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Judicial review; Political science; Autonomy; Law and economics; Law; Constitutional law; Democracy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.008906481484102238,"score_gpt":0.2645156749137673,"score_spread":0.2556091934296651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122261122","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32085136,0.10946341,0.007143217,0.22287695,0.0009252748,0.0006497978,0.000009400373,0.00007285752,0.33800775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824406,0.016536135,0.000023745912,0.0003548408,0.00029593776,0.0000012999117,2.9185517e-7,0.0000011512376,0.0003460127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865985,0.00012220896,0.00015787393,0.000073424206,0.00030371462,0.0006829297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961305,0.00009067181,0.00009341309,0.000038984763,0.00012259206,0.000041313186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018916632,0.00006084393,0.00013550636,0.000028043325,0.001062848,0.000026245907,0.00014692235,0.000034445704,0.000015838847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002192,0.000038787064,0.000064369786,0.0001283078,0.0015942561,0.000108550106,0.000013092664,0.00041908812,0.0000036752015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038348455,0.000013400782,0.00027568245,2.5368018e-7,0.00004375838,5.382757e-7,0.0007204241,0.0000011190563,0.000016772838,0.98860794,0.00008746164,0.01019428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056016416,0.000042590935,0.0013002406,0.000009567182,0.000026974012,0.000047512123,0.0023612604,0.000001316031,0.0000069967523,0.9792503,0.016341029,0.00005204534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015183492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029568514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6615892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016335049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019312727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8174675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122263052","doi":"","title":"Bills of Rights as Process: The Canadian Experience","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Process (computing); Articulation (sociology); Charter; Law and economics; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Product (mathematics); Fundamental rights; Public relations; Public administration; Law; Business; Sociology; Human rights; Computer science","score_opus":0.010676770037661243,"score_gpt":0.2931669308882238,"score_spread":0.28249016085056255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122263052","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6868204,0.0049833353,0.000053098334,0.021592261,0.00024747677,0.00017302699,0.0000013031859,0.000017527856,0.2861116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980727,0.0009299585,0.0000026961081,0.00034155793,0.00027810578,0.0000020930806,1.3584936e-7,0.0000012073009,0.00037154712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983199,0.00005317982,0.0001272063,0.00007525443,0.00035128946,0.0010731178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961036,0.000024964533,0.00007208436,0.000047731515,0.00015265231,0.00009218048],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078105944,0.00005678057,0.00008161356,0.000043612094,0.002267358,0.0000368312,0.0002999931,0.000037061378,0.000047691356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011678249,0.000034548913,0.000048749378,0.0002513267,0.00042422954,0.00012509926,0.0000044254907,0.0004249495,0.000017306245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045655793,0.000010851037,0.00064172654,1.066038e-7,0.000015097115,0.0000014116152,0.0062928745,0.0000030253464,0.000007793361,0.9897237,0.000045385248,0.0032535018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006029036,0.000074626914,0.0011929844,0.0000085282145,0.0000073533756,0.00002147156,0.01416803,4.6463518e-7,0.000041065465,0.9652604,0.019109188,0.00005561911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4559331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9317582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47582513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005606992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00848114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99903154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122343195","doi":"","title":"The Hydraulics of Constitutional Claims: Multiplicity of Actors in Constitutional Interpretation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Judicial interpretation; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Democracy; Law; Legalization; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.024609461167033723,"score_gpt":0.2673882039217682,"score_spread":0.2427787427547345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122343195","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13115665,0.0000063220164,0.00402595,0.0003455275,0.0003664113,0.00037224728,0.000050418636,0.000031802374,0.86364466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99183136,0.007855015,0.0001716089,0.000032162156,0.00009456767,0.0000016160197,0.000004802683,0.0000016219672,0.0000072479315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888307,0.0001663913,0.00022409504,0.0001715771,0.0003456703,0.00020921907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889356,0.00036946175,0.00017179456,0.00009809453,0.0004288246,0.000038255625],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036497394,0.00009765779,0.00017102058,0.0013607047,0.0006757473,0.000012481866,0.00029033958,0.000085697495,0.000018485767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036946387,0.000086152584,0.000088384106,0.0030827806,0.012707907,0.00025255507,0.00010365234,0.00011511366,0.000006420725],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019052096,0.00011139928,0.013447872,0.0000058745322,0.000052561838,0.0000040612426,0.0074962275,0.000026994221,0.000021997115,0.97446513,0.000042465417,0.0041349055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006543247,0.000080844715,0.003804072,0.00009171809,0.00003477644,0.0000012547795,0.0065665487,0.00017099609,0.00049010216,0.00040847808,0.98754364,0.00015325543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.071644366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13821216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98750114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023496478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017180917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9899789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122367334","doi":"","title":"The New Constitution and the Judicialization of Pure Politics Worldwide","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Politics; Law; Constitutionalism; Human rights; Constitution; Democracy","score_opus":0.017601125761629022,"score_gpt":0.292893257251816,"score_spread":0.27529213149018694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122367334","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002399348,0.4100663,0.00068940327,0.045266215,0.000330801,0.0007901968,0.000007448469,0.000030000938,0.54257965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83461547,0.16150792,0.00004547202,0.00242324,0.0006134269,0.000023711258,0.000005595345,0.000002821185,0.0007623523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919987,0.00013330091,0.00023191002,0.00007324533,0.00022141071,0.00014028975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945027,0.00021975348,0.000116656935,0.000078391146,0.00010753521,0.000027377982],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065442896,0.000058723796,0.00016783037,0.0000062166855,0.0014004059,0.000030502395,0.0001089697,0.000024221908,0.00001643213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027294335,0.000031108444,0.00006123274,0.0002007935,0.0023917921,0.00006350349,0.000029804607,0.00004492969,0.000006417164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025742638,0.00000409264,0.00012000629,0.000029876837,0.000008143571,1.7616087e-7,0.000056448087,8.364359e-7,3.6661453e-7,0.9899053,0.007431523,0.0024406705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009756926,0.0000028644622,0.00013493444,0.00028779934,0.000047128153,7.190589e-7,0.00005074725,6.936963e-7,0.0000024159049,0.32337314,0.6759724,0.000029624985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028175721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024080202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8343755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002411092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018582762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122419111","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3566","title":"Judicial Influence on the Duty to Consult and Accommodate","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Judicial review; Supreme court; Law; Legislature; Cabinet (room); Incentive; Political science; Context (archaeology); Negotiation; Law and economics; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.04834772899519527,"score_gpt":0.2925433267684163,"score_spread":0.24419559777322106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122419111","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.118486255,0.0002246668,0.000063965395,0.18140844,0.00021603557,0.00016018456,0.000012344994,0.000032263408,0.69939584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811428,0.00018543057,0.000057371257,0.017886842,0.00070206815,0.0000040543214,1.83979e-7,0.0000033919714,0.000017851162],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989945,0.00012803623,0.00015010932,0.00012536514,0.00037183813,0.00023012701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993386,0.00017895288,0.00006129965,0.000048423575,0.0001220143,0.0002506578],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004015463,0.000083400955,0.000121329474,0.00001185925,0.002751612,0.0001779035,0.0002415707,0.00003735914,0.00010500672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005217644,0.00005598657,0.00003909583,0.00015057338,0.00058786257,0.00013295165,0.000086301196,0.00026656725,0.00013095555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003699377,0.000010704914,0.0008573974,5.852191e-7,0.00002005019,0.00001395375,0.0024816643,0.000029207318,0.00007284085,0.99332565,0.001775604,0.0013753527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061665586,0.0002804378,0.015773369,0.00011447977,0.0000556965,0.000029921632,0.0075486726,0.000014544271,0.00019376862,0.54896885,0.42599672,0.00040687967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02682487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05727659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86265653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003088114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009815118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99854666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122420731","doi":"","title":"Democracy and Dissent: Reconsidering the Judicial Review of the Political Sphere","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Dissent; Democracy; Supreme court; Law; Politics; Political science; Sociology; Constitutional court; Law and economics; Constitution","score_opus":0.0832494212198956,"score_gpt":0.36687341694996023,"score_spread":0.28362399573006464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122420731","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14184211,0.07664814,0.000013311554,0.29670274,0.00082461565,0.00034279667,0.000002306813,0.000023892155,0.4836001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99407256,0.0036347257,0.000018065213,0.0015896187,0.00037093094,0.0000033869105,6.7942274e-8,0.0000016651578,0.0003089548],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939007,0.00010398691,0.00008346303,0.000048947808,0.00016823388,0.00020531742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963003,0.00017488313,0.000039207873,0.00006756281,0.000034260942,0.0000540777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031633207,0.000041504103,0.00009021931,0.000003045923,0.00070244056,0.000007156127,0.000085394575,0.000018775989,0.00014023707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059144705,0.000022108476,0.000040126994,0.000101582955,0.00082778116,0.000047796788,0.00007177537,0.00006387326,0.000009057209],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012244386,0.000009922978,0.020880828,0.00004009055,0.000010323191,1.4282541e-7,0.0028213314,2.304184e-8,0.000015132143,0.9724034,0.0022046575,0.0016128963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020102515,0.000020656566,0.1498821,0.0034367435,0.00024738547,0.000017409284,0.0860397,0.0000013074837,0.0003574595,0.2521677,0.5072967,0.00033183553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038914077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012419962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8522305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019025332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007163482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.588267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122481768","doi":"10.32920/29936570","title":"Exploring a More Independent Freedom of Peaceful Assembly in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Peaceful coexistence; General assembly; Freedom of religion; Sociology; Law and economics; Human rights","score_opus":0.06874741129468909,"score_gpt":0.2891976940730983,"score_spread":0.22045028277840922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122481768","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7079036,0.0001805879,0.000039089577,0.0028217454,0.00031362972,0.00006439984,0.0000016647307,0.000007695048,0.28866756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992965,0.000111631,0.000026422305,0.00013020127,0.000030970554,0.000014267609,2.1231092e-7,6.7965317e-7,0.00038912756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999408,0.000022942879,0.00011730761,0.000078025136,0.00024411816,0.00012962114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998056,0.00006431765,0.000019039408,0.000038161932,0.00005005174,0.000022803843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014061699,0.00003662926,0.00009516392,0.000042432108,0.00012879247,0.0000055831215,0.000103079125,0.000012927197,0.00003515848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009787234,0.00003342093,0.000017439788,0.00028663487,0.000101660386,0.00007802893,0.00004651036,0.00004762454,0.0000012211109],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068299205,0.000022842185,0.2613215,0.0000048959837,0.000022007924,0.000008189762,0.0024532808,0.00010939733,0.000040520063,0.7312744,0.0010217209,0.0037143664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030762693,0.0000071171858,0.8522181,0.00009559928,0.000010621715,9.688344e-8,0.11008451,0.000028758037,0.0003402053,0.006422407,0.030344926,0.00014003752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9986825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.724852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003324143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021403173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3796831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122505542","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2007.0004","title":"The Reasonable Justice: An Empirical Analysis of Frank Iacobucci's Career on the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Economic Justice; Politics; Sociology; Voting; Political science","score_opus":0.025530191102306383,"score_gpt":0.2686493321745971,"score_spread":0.24311914107229068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122505542","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51263344,0.0013709097,0.00033390685,0.0051540043,0.00037468906,0.00010339565,0.000051523923,0.0000056106733,0.47997254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993114,0.00027803014,0.000042159245,0.00007203808,0.00007734414,1.4536395e-8,5.5389756e-7,0.0000010081321,0.00021744691],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988701,0.00011953459,0.00013216502,0.000063403444,0.00063776586,0.00017705918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988474,0.0003645072,0.00017201027,0.00008937306,0.00043510742,0.000091585236],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010675107,0.000049200236,0.00016186736,0.0000140320335,0.0021773153,0.000008897855,0.00035312245,0.000036339763,0.00035958286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009284882,0.00003325001,0.00011246658,0.00011172634,0.0007438191,0.0001095064,0.000032682685,0.00009113644,1.8016883e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038001695,0.00014413527,0.02829002,0.0000045048123,0.0017211741,0.000029198645,0.015866807,0.00052628625,0.000043394684,0.93316,0.018532999,0.0013014595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041730123,0.00018571618,0.30234522,0.00003900276,0.0021560723,0.0000019018024,0.31469998,0.000110141766,0.00007693324,0.0015734526,0.37821853,0.00017575415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9698301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93158656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035695257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050778623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122591002","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0011","title":"Democracy, Community, and Federalism in Electoral Apportionment Cases: The United States, Canada, and Australia in Comparative Perspective","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalist; Democracy; Federalism; Individualism; Jurisprudence; Apportionment; Political science; Legislature; Separation of powers; State (computer science); Sociology; Law; Politics; Law and economics","score_opus":0.06483907648198886,"score_gpt":0.29210837386029515,"score_spread":0.22726929737830628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122591002","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938523,0.00037132038,0.0000049631976,0.001566877,0.00003543863,0.000068684785,0.000009319543,0.0000017033,0.0040893583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989306,0.0008608958,0.000022122746,0.00006863127,0.000012562503,5.4738766e-8,0.0000015996791,6.247023e-7,0.00010295575],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999283,0.0003032423,0.00007919136,0.000048948885,0.00016537214,0.00012020188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965173,0.000103392806,0.00006532107,0.000025583024,0.000094577124,0.000059387457],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023588332,0.00004892616,0.00011232411,0.000015791165,0.0022888095,0.00001228765,0.0000889784,0.000021013298,0.000053764197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013632553,0.000044223776,0.000012745356,0.00004971025,0.00089655817,0.00016517795,0.000046130528,0.00018177289,1.1163442e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021127753,0.00018293415,0.45023268,0.000003805578,0.000115354414,0.0004882104,0.33024016,0.00025585643,0.000006666245,0.21423781,0.003963539,0.000061710474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046346197,0.000053248255,0.5913345,0.000021688464,0.0000108125305,0.00004589516,0.39669272,0.000014274991,0.0000011116905,0.0029351544,0.0083510615,0.00007601892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99976784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99994063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21130265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009090977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022466855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122602294","doi":"10.7202/1074419ar","title":"Les avis consultatifs au Canada : omniprésents, déterminants, banalisés et déroutants : Essai critique de Carissima Mathen, Courts Without Cases: The Law and Politics of Advisory Opinions, Oxford, Hart, 2019 et Kate Puddister, Seeking the Court’s Advice: The Politics of the Canadian Reference Power, Vancouver, UBC Press, 2019","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Politics; Ex parte; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027945566024496472,"score_gpt":0.31434958007070196,"score_spread":0.28640401404620547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122602294","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07578846,0.09265873,0.00007921043,0.2768767,0.014646949,0.0020801944,0.061466075,0.000046830533,0.47635686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98525715,0.0063618748,0.000051039668,0.006041418,0.00026397125,0.000010539083,0.000019995543,0.000025574329,0.0019684169],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99471873,0.0020674549,0.0008540487,0.00031175633,0.0010322334,0.0010157854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99604493,0.0014197333,0.0007194087,0.0004369529,0.0009889667,0.0003900053],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001878089,0.00037867957,0.0005333474,0.000026983202,0.012269708,0.00021026786,0.0008654626,0.00020303456,0.00007741788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005373487,0.00021714292,0.00017283726,0.00022401148,0.0042221337,0.000301976,0.00030277023,0.0010790324,8.761268e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014791665,0.000074610674,0.0050678686,0.000056676312,0.00030301983,0.00011971383,0.0044914125,0.000089479225,0.0000029981513,0.9660201,0.023564257,0.00019508795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047822943,0.00004424375,0.007507309,0.0008605717,0.00040887523,0.00051861786,0.01981734,0.00007304137,0.000053765867,0.012635457,0.9572988,0.00030376308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9977808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99971527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95338464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009292107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006744266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122619448","doi":"10.5131/ajcl.2014.0030","title":"Economic and Social Rights in National Constitutions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Library science; Media studies; Göran; Sociology; Law; Art; Humanities; Computer science","score_opus":0.03941342542345785,"score_gpt":0.34522461304100094,"score_spread":0.3058111876175431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122619448","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80759865,0.000061600054,0.00015611184,0.006339338,0.00010511376,0.000040760977,0.0000035169269,0.0000032660234,0.18569167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991254,0.000011431546,0.00006393178,0.0004175063,0.00036634092,0.000001306668,1.6677379e-7,5.659885e-7,0.000013323718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992736,0.00025736683,0.00016478145,0.000045510253,0.000165138,0.0000935872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935055,0.00030179508,0.0001967537,0.000016494407,0.00010656127,0.000027837077],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005740737,0.000045715486,0.0001973158,0.00003350855,0.00076969666,0.000026139322,0.00011148543,0.000007943747,0.000015185712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000072067355,0.00003064804,0.000036032674,0.000079258054,0.0047394894,0.00011123116,0.000015632044,0.00009693639,0.0000112426105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025763718,0.000009133253,0.00066186546,1.2335208e-7,0.000021432803,3.8597088e-7,0.0038078453,0.000046868518,0.000006435471,0.99494666,0.00032741675,0.00014608387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028490386,0.00008967412,0.014688515,0.000010979328,0.000013625403,0.000009248432,0.0043817605,0.000024650368,0.000013772922,0.76699364,0.21340853,0.00008069008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028574062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012259184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.227953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008536808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017518745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99796903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122712333","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2175360","title":"Explaining Theoretical Disagreement and Massive Decisional Agreement: The Justificatory View","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Agreement; Epistemology; Econometrics; Psychology; Positive economics; Mathematics; Economics; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.021128428192716077,"score_gpt":0.29860894027831136,"score_spread":0.27748051208559527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122712333","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.589186,0.17490222,0.015082717,0.06405221,0.0026811871,0.00079617044,0.000010413063,0.00007014167,0.15321892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98411345,0.014222835,0.000028201097,0.00033295655,0.0011253055,0.000010550665,5.526492e-7,0.000004054445,0.00016208163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99734885,0.00021943341,0.00019795861,0.00011060615,0.00056867115,0.0015544941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935967,0.00027861499,0.00008817819,0.00006554895,0.00006679454,0.00014118121],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039351485,0.000100137026,0.000115361276,0.000029662102,0.0022622363,0.00004906174,0.00021399032,0.000041918345,0.00022285152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024667822,0.00006142463,0.00006710607,0.000117132295,0.0011779169,0.00018927836,0.00007783526,0.0006562538,0.00005541411],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013790331,0.000030866195,0.0043979823,5.355494e-7,0.00006807932,6.2096717e-7,0.002201791,8.414651e-7,0.0000052202486,0.96396744,0.00013186732,0.029180985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021002005,0.00005451134,0.005516939,0.000027331585,0.00007164924,0.000037861344,0.05469359,0.0000040268833,0.0000037620925,0.87979966,0.059441097,0.0001395589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000106023006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005912308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39492744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041878643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089151587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99903667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122742871","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.3.355","title":"ARGUMENTS OF VIRTUE AND CONSTITUTIONAL CRIMINAL PROCEDURE","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Constitutional interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Democracy; Law and economics; Constitutional theory; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Constitutional law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.02032845432850052,"score_gpt":0.23900120557065604,"score_spread":0.21867275124215552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122742871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41394642,0.002571082,0.0009996435,0.000554533,0.00023028997,0.00009385281,0.000022903576,0.00001106614,0.5815702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998205,0.0011384258,0.00039190546,0.000024883953,0.00006827533,1.7835857e-8,3.7596718e-7,5.488085e-7,0.00017058919],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994978,0.00003231896,0.000075786,0.000056686287,0.00025194717,0.00008548242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996137,0.000022165614,0.000090889705,0.000020907848,0.00017713825,0.00007521751],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001158763,0.000039800812,0.00010340925,0.000009802338,0.0014399465,0.0000037736238,0.000094531395,0.000033022356,0.00028751738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024853058,0.000041791613,0.00004393624,0.000017698345,0.0056347,0.00027476207,0.000032049542,0.000050191302,0.0000013813044],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047325495,0.000048752485,0.008516249,0.000004147697,0.000043521326,0.000022740334,0.004546189,0.0000030329054,0.00006122768,0.9860363,0.00043024134,0.00024027421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0052543636,0.0007311646,0.23133087,0.0004887876,0.0005362848,0.00080525817,0.2117968,0.000019817278,0.00035565867,0.044908408,0.50295925,0.0008133111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03698629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029259836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9411279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010003878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026266446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122809871","doi":"","title":"A Judiciary Cleaved: Superior Courts, Statutory Courts and the Illogic of Difference","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of New Brunswick Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statutory law; Statute; Windsor; Supreme court; Political science; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.02501657741348886,"score_gpt":0.24908470835970112,"score_spread":0.22406813094621225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122809871","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9056708,0.0016170278,0.00021511773,0.0095183775,0.00030038765,0.00012561967,0.000007305998,0.000010200462,0.082535125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99613786,0.0029042372,0.000115619165,0.00010133906,0.00014237383,1.2762992e-8,1.7686507e-7,0.0000017008906,0.0005966564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991885,0.00010768946,0.00011773295,0.00009016855,0.0003313877,0.00016456352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991905,0.0001231291,0.00028510415,0.00011102844,0.00016958285,0.00012066822],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046124906,0.000069411195,0.00022829861,0.000025007095,0.004191081,0.000049124537,0.00043337516,0.00005204351,0.00008106495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000114877475,0.000054247637,0.000090495785,0.000021452292,0.005343807,0.00020291195,0.00014074445,0.00016727087,0.0000021703045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019848478,0.00002887957,0.014258112,0.0000031431332,0.00007781464,0.000027842687,0.007434918,0.0000017602724,0.000033144574,0.9741213,0.0007507059,0.0030639446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036421996,0.00012459302,0.6447341,0.00018395738,0.00021196816,0.000031648688,0.030167276,0.000013302955,0.000018618739,0.18844514,0.13220146,0.00022573183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21901514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0950718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7856761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004008702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077468663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122815674","doi":"","title":"Witnessing Arbitrariness: Roncarelli v. Duplessis Fifty Years On","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Principle of legality; Normative; Law; Politics; Epistemology; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.012063817984124568,"score_gpt":0.2775531025055072,"score_spread":0.2654892845213826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122815674","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92153704,0.0010136723,0.00041023627,0.0038969696,0.0012625676,0.000083834864,0.0000015869089,0.00005920184,0.071734875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957244,0.0017179961,0.000038451148,0.00020138567,0.0014964432,0.0000023652278,7.827002e-7,0.000008089886,0.0008100949],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779904,0.00006566827,0.00015727714,0.00015094367,0.00043098629,0.0013960663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995732,0.000066955356,0.0000932888,0.00007897146,0.000092732174,0.00009489723],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012184023,0.000101932426,0.00013549291,0.00006685455,0.0013516017,0.00009944547,0.0002586042,0.0000900896,0.00009997172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017591093,0.000090421425,0.00009899667,0.00021727242,0.00042203945,0.00017459429,0.000026272179,0.0017939013,0.00007994873],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016179529,0.000038885075,0.003962191,4.6805476e-7,0.000044231518,0.000005519018,0.000773175,0.0000061808173,0.00011482686,0.9576144,0.00008513236,0.037338763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035077916,0.00008829395,0.01595541,0.000027680298,0.000034331293,0.00004244417,0.009035221,0.000004801538,0.000030565676,0.9076922,0.06648717,0.00025112685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028851521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03775201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07418734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034175513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029768045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122878896","doi":"10.1177/0951629811411751","title":"‘While there’s a breath in my body’: The systemic effects of politically motivated retirement from the Supreme Court","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Supreme court; Suspect; Politics; Economic Justice; Law; Economics; Ideology; Political science; Roberts Court","score_opus":0.022697869826885143,"score_gpt":0.26689744134970783,"score_spread":0.24419957152282268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122878896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9338554,0.0010752962,0.00032926272,0.00848352,0.0005865762,0.00035205475,0.000027597289,0.000013275456,0.055276997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99865127,0.00015509845,0.000056766756,0.0005713102,0.00053032394,0.0000038098065,3.9003567e-7,0.000007245549,0.000023787414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757445,0.0006716753,0.00057259947,0.00009944147,0.0006728494,0.00040895655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99716604,0.0019630399,0.00022739437,0.0001690781,0.0003321412,0.00014233554],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011972294,0.00012477403,0.00032801385,0.00003683168,0.0002836165,0.00002583133,0.0005867654,0.00009278816,0.00014767365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017901227,0.000063172774,0.00016931705,0.00016008275,0.0033436334,0.00006072912,0.00009122382,0.00032012252,0.000008286179],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046425455,0.0001347511,0.009673058,0.000010003567,0.00009710149,0.000024479172,0.006378864,7.772795e-7,0.0001084153,0.9832195,0.0002709804,0.000035668938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042971832,0.00018354953,0.03992784,0.00047386196,0.00016072049,0.000011810409,0.0055263476,0.000013258576,0.0007737083,0.9519164,0.000482081,0.00010067682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005519197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001163618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06479585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000175835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034851386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99936867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122916034","doi":"","title":"Federalism and Equality Rights Implementation in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Jurisdiction; Political science; Supreme court; Abortion; Order (exchange); Cooperative federalism; Government (linguistics); Executive order; Reproductive rights; New Federalism; Law; Human rights; Public administration; Law and economics; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.011640047651751589,"score_gpt":0.29531702712380015,"score_spread":0.28367697947204856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122916034","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98146325,0.0007272926,0.00033802248,0.005111228,0.00016514961,0.000060227092,0.0000013270176,0.0000044208673,0.0121290535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988357,0.0007025853,0.0000057290194,0.00018501675,0.00020217481,0.0000017356732,7.951273e-7,0.0000011819703,0.000065080414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866694,0.00014850181,0.00012605658,0.00007092725,0.00021534294,0.00077225256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998116,0.000041989464,0.000048739526,0.000019343885,0.000033369855,0.00004498669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012946969,0.000043861444,0.00007475768,0.00002079794,0.00078456046,0.000030325922,0.000060937247,0.000015068292,0.000021662792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027298778,0.0000379281,0.000013083158,0.00007069989,0.00006455607,0.00009674519,0.000011426078,0.00027584218,0.0000013425185],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032990245,0.000003170875,0.036285684,2.8752572e-7,0.000010667608,4.1191413e-7,0.0004216987,0.0000010829165,0.000002768801,0.9505783,0.00005887807,0.012633782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024614614,0.00001906273,0.027664509,0.0000035650482,0.0000045648544,0.0000054979014,0.012247951,0.000002924349,0.0000039732363,0.9371236,0.022611856,0.000066356595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9960266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99993324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022552978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016833562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005074685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9002273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122934301","doi":"10.22145/flr.38.3.5","title":"Judiciaries in Crisis — Some Comparative Perspectives","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Meaning (existential); Political science; Power (physics); Executive power; Law; Political economy; Development economics; Sociology; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0490169392290615,"score_gpt":0.363439455138616,"score_spread":0.3144225159095545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122934301","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016913356,0.23835327,0.000007317372,0.0601129,0.0006397539,0.00068550877,0.00001269854,0.00009372459,0.68318146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.967974,0.027874313,0.00007675476,0.003589265,0.00032911228,0.00006533621,0.0000014216178,0.0000024213346,0.00008736128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990879,0.00011636714,0.0001773414,0.00017455923,0.00022623416,0.00021758904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963915,0.00007666473,0.000051157604,0.00007199637,0.000103014594,0.000058006826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036742273,0.000092671515,0.00030725615,0.000016575179,0.00094122405,0.000056448454,0.00013736547,0.000042490086,0.00042385285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013077415,0.00007704382,0.00008106469,0.00017524174,0.0007802729,0.0003255391,0.000038486913,0.00020571596,0.00012224252],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022535469,0.00003392597,0.00034533194,0.000020962485,0.000010579751,0.000002608883,0.0025262812,9.906541e-8,0.0000038984713,0.99223894,0.0045911623,0.00022397435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008614856,0.0000133432895,0.0018317485,0.00033999112,0.000015573733,7.958155e-7,0.0044685276,2.863511e-7,0.00000683157,0.16704237,0.826037,0.0001574103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032309134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09637885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95106065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004469902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011667043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9741348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122947590","doi":"10.5040/9781472561312.ch-002","title":"Canada: Protecting Rights in a ‘Worldwide Rights Culture’. An Empirical Study of the Use of Foreign Precedents by the Supreme Court of Canada (1982–2010)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.06039842324295125,"score_gpt":0.26434149545572716,"score_spread":0.2039430722127759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122947590","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12518458,0.000099318575,0.000007999873,0.0014638494,0.0012487939,0.0033179885,0.00046919065,0.00002828264,0.86818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94191766,8.309555e-7,0.000012625102,0.00017953626,0.00019328775,0.000042624994,0.000008756082,0.000011623414,0.05763303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963258,0.00039279604,0.0007233873,0.0003563844,0.0018304134,0.00037123213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977228,0.00041456026,0.0007744788,0.00038659133,0.00058769796,0.00011386246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011053667,0.00027054182,0.0005744088,0.000064035776,0.0012342634,0.00017079628,0.0010323524,0.00019945497,0.00002583457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059792574,0.00015699354,0.0000960719,0.0000863516,0.000637918,0.00028769145,0.00022887053,0.0007217174,1.301796e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012956778,0.0002474005,0.013924558,0.00008901628,0.0007088535,0.000019933703,0.030355483,0.00010679104,0.00004551559,0.5319815,0.42168903,0.00070231216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042345744,0.00009037199,0.0025794269,0.00043071772,0.00010631873,0.0000015352115,0.0015839639,0.000013184591,0.00012853686,0.02179964,0.97251296,0.0003298653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9992736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8167331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049953436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038327966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9493081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122959533","doi":"","title":"Three Narratives About Canadian Election Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Election law; Law; Campaign finance; Narrative; Legislation; Federal election; Public administration; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology; Voting","score_opus":0.01773282879754739,"score_gpt":0.2909031369379172,"score_spread":0.2731703081403698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122959533","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10052481,0.005044535,0.0012132212,0.04054815,0.001347824,0.00018246066,0.0000037663856,0.00004271585,0.8510925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99542403,0.0023128465,0.000015238616,0.00019722445,0.0012100512,0.0000039822503,4.770873e-7,0.0000045475467,0.00083159533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978439,0.00004368698,0.000110375455,0.00011407873,0.00025208676,0.0016358551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948764,0.000013499248,0.000113999355,0.00009389513,0.00013592698,0.00015505542],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011219308,0.00008061957,0.00010222714,0.00004541909,0.011535443,0.00026958235,0.0003543974,0.0000636261,0.00006224596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012622726,0.00007231523,0.00007033214,0.000055371635,0.0006705336,0.00038698167,0.000017849386,0.00071364595,0.000056864323],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060982175,0.000006576286,0.0038876056,1.8577568e-7,0.000055506378,0.000002342537,0.00091292436,4.7222497e-7,0.000010426195,0.98720765,0.00017886354,0.007731349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011245207,0.00004185561,0.008362732,0.0000085820075,0.000008309957,0.000016309032,0.0048427186,6.3954064e-7,0.0000043110053,0.84999454,0.13651511,0.00009242641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7876496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89489925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013853434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006931749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99869806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123040256","doi":"","title":"Of Pigeonholes and Principles: A Reconsideration of Discrimination Law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Common law; Statutory law; Law; Legislature; Action (physics); Quality (philosophy); Prejudice (legal term); Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.076643368074212,"score_gpt":0.28735525985051685,"score_spread":0.21071189177630484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123040256","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034784943,0.0012992969,0.0002025351,0.0026640806,0.00014868271,0.000075643,0.0000059320296,0.000008305141,0.9608106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986024,0.0007205212,0.0003995071,0.00006418305,0.00011513603,0.0000013892734,4.4528028e-7,0.0000020197115,0.000094435265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928087,0.00007957841,0.00022946882,0.00006592136,0.00024374909,0.00010038854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951106,0.00006720925,0.00016970094,0.00003402118,0.00017038047,0.0000476503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034796423,0.00004797803,0.000119888806,0.000023884757,0.00072998414,0.000033099263,0.000053928856,0.000037491674,0.00010901034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009528465,0.000041426447,0.000039363895,0.000053029245,0.000706925,0.00023430327,0.0000180091,0.000071082606,0.0000019693948],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004355877,0.00004126127,0.00094607944,0.0000058448823,0.000017038956,0.0000015455256,0.0030127077,0.00000852514,0.00016456463,0.99362975,0.00003809186,0.0021302148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006099422,0.00014783435,0.0056503704,0.00022723156,0.00008373628,0.000044257355,0.008663672,0.00009436365,0.0014522007,0.9643448,0.018485358,0.00019622206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030058542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27287188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9638174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024441992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023440087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9764004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123075200","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.1.137","title":"STRUCTURAL JUDICIAL REVIEW AND THE OBJECTION FROM DEMOCRACY","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Law; Judicial review; Separation of powers; Enforcement; Democracy; Legislation; Federalism; Politics; Judicial activism; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.009126243226453234,"score_gpt":0.2355373833031734,"score_spread":0.22641114007672017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123075200","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23796473,0.04086637,0.00010025642,0.029756572,0.0020430686,0.00032189288,0.000024906889,0.000030552637,0.68889165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873513,0.011848158,0.00014181543,0.00022178225,0.0003583848,1.9320684e-8,4.0676733e-7,7.7209313e-7,0.00007734646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956197,0.000086085594,0.00006344395,0.00005230737,0.00015837135,0.00007780123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965036,0.00006694141,0.0000901047,0.000033983786,0.0001085487,0.000050082195],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027867165,0.000036741112,0.000116383926,0.0000031348502,0.0024728798,0.000016933063,0.00013026987,0.00003030246,0.0011710058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006236872,0.000027639067,0.000055714263,0.000016421425,0.0012439843,0.0002655469,0.000037128866,0.0001328313,0.0000021030512],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007889676,0.0000073571296,0.0016141698,0.0000041074045,0.000082581784,0.0000044796675,0.005087558,2.8257173e-7,0.000036527166,0.9827385,0.0018495151,0.008496036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026379386,0.00005461394,0.09475372,0.00021860625,0.00086914253,0.000038384467,0.025381647,0.000010635448,0.000008912411,0.28200775,0.5937246,0.00029403623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.53904855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7205359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74938655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046069836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006109461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123080248","doi":"10.4324/9781351201834-9","title":"Quasi-Constitutional Amendments","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Buffalo law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional amendment; Constitution; Repeal; Constitutional law; Statutory law; Law; Political science; Politics; Phenomenon; Constitutional economics; Constitutional theory; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.08522650486391328,"score_gpt":0.37911151265059795,"score_spread":0.2938850077866847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123080248","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010185748,0.08760783,0.000056711026,0.013861269,0.0005741623,0.00029753492,0.000015575784,0.000040715582,0.89744437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88034856,0.11401237,0.00011047899,0.004323484,0.0004894155,0.000051645402,0.000005055019,0.0000026800612,0.00065631553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989942,0.00006646304,0.00017386333,0.0001680494,0.0003733331,0.00022412244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941146,0.00003367636,0.00013063774,0.0002280442,0.000103273254,0.00009293233],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051832706,0.000087825836,0.00021575278,0.00000746184,0.003928274,0.000115672236,0.00038929252,0.000035420213,0.00050890865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035829307,0.000075094926,0.00010615903,0.000040941577,0.003245911,0.00029546197,0.00008964613,0.00006896812,0.00078278355],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010069418,0.000047031604,0.00045747907,0.000040281684,0.000017159433,0.0000053798117,0.00002943907,3.1810508e-8,8.3976886e-7,0.9885883,0.0064470144,0.00436606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007648009,0.000009015199,0.0004175347,0.0008172729,0.00003197306,0.0000014045962,0.0000189052,1.0165977e-7,0.0000015241932,0.031532194,0.9669937,0.0000998944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014915044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038063366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9605467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000062803665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021322299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123119869","doi":"","title":"Furthering Substantive Equality Through Administrative Law: Charter Values in Education","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Obligation; Law; Administrative law; Political science; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Realm; Context (archaeology); Sociology","score_opus":0.14175817991856662,"score_gpt":0.394159776083472,"score_spread":0.25240159616490543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123119869","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018007925,0.119937934,0.0010514021,0.016130317,0.0020405385,0.0022331171,0.00081465946,0.0001593138,0.8396248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829111,0.011773136,0.000099341276,0.0041673547,0.0006301046,0.00019442255,0.00005143435,0.000006824461,0.0001662754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99678254,0.0008046472,0.00059337023,0.0003718729,0.00079542905,0.00065212854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99789226,0.00056963356,0.00023936786,0.00026848717,0.00085850095,0.00017174025],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017533518,0.0003131265,0.00048888655,0.000027214885,0.0016707339,0.00008664875,0.00044137897,0.00010767296,0.00051914586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005167375,0.00023998233,0.00016992503,0.00034845085,0.008660964,0.0014128662,0.00012622822,0.0003459719,0.00016537783],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003379086,0.00020458073,0.001046625,0.00006302558,0.000043896613,0.00000557869,0.005408009,0.0000016191823,0.000012818219,0.99175024,0.00099855,0.0004312384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033495252,0.000091277776,0.0022643374,0.0024536706,0.00019184491,0.00007658117,0.022276,0.0000029534635,0.00009995054,0.13579485,0.8356421,0.000771517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028886378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023786105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9649032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000265225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018305165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123151269","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Structure and Original Intent: A Canadian Perspective","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Perspective (graphical); Legislature; Law; Political science; Relation (database); Constitutional court; Constitution; Computer science","score_opus":0.013015675498741336,"score_gpt":0.2906172350274863,"score_spread":0.277601559528745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123151269","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33409286,0.0124938255,0.00067877216,0.07170538,0.0018786689,0.00032240432,0.00007171939,0.00004294146,0.5787134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99615484,0.002506,0.000025577761,0.00014468112,0.0007914877,0.0000012915633,6.394215e-7,0.0000019064518,0.00037359906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982892,0.00003968397,0.0000853892,0.00013186756,0.00023709651,0.0012167444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940103,0.000017883383,0.000084077976,0.000064667525,0.00023265001,0.00019966331],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054363575,0.00008374592,0.00010285401,0.000046073983,0.006708246,0.00023184286,0.00025208184,0.00005862565,0.00007964617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003621491,0.00007315741,0.000042643278,0.000041079278,0.0025794355,0.00028748586,0.000028863762,0.00076363795,0.000013428169],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000943452,0.000004046113,0.017882327,2.0297414e-7,0.00007323696,0.000007730137,0.0007717456,5.6616665e-7,0.000003024378,0.97909707,0.00005986286,0.002090745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019997064,0.000030035611,0.0060554687,0.0000105832905,0.000020389947,0.00015617163,0.014272356,7.4969194e-7,0.0000012063565,0.92056245,0.058591373,0.000099241835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.53042614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9373122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6620619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020827104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011511073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99458486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123170955","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1066","title":"Judges and Politics: An Essay From Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Politics; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02987739487511638,"score_gpt":0.2944399156730049,"score_spread":0.26456252079788856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123170955","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059397772,0.54245555,0.000025245301,0.08381083,0.0007037423,0.00066470134,0.00019044703,0.00010548988,0.3126462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94717795,0.042986106,0.000092388625,0.009252805,0.00039908884,0.000011685706,0.000013208987,0.0000040775863,0.00006269088],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991237,0.000071346476,0.00013966698,0.00016055773,0.00029282912,0.0002119357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958354,0.00004619695,0.000033965018,0.00009884313,0.00009197787,0.00014545559],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020348928,0.00008234356,0.00020375353,0.000004731195,0.0006672079,0.00002759014,0.00012990345,0.000026898922,0.00018221523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000098725424,0.00007068713,0.000027498825,0.00007145616,0.00042480236,0.00012400317,0.000033973578,0.00005862956,0.000016135857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.005076e-7,0.0000107991245,0.0008641446,0.00003406111,0.000015289219,0.0000061139517,0.00021567414,2.9950925e-7,0.000001573602,0.99675345,0.0011245748,0.0009736112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007667953,0.000007916263,0.0014356759,0.0004733318,0.000045034878,6.5485983e-7,0.0002130183,5.8619317e-8,0.000005487483,0.094526425,0.9031033,0.00011242485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9836786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98669523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90222704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020130776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011257478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5131691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123222988","doi":"","title":"Reassessing the Constitutional Foundation ofDelegated Legislation in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Foundation (evidence); Law; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.029040781574877356,"score_gpt":0.2900123740432471,"score_spread":0.26097159246836976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123222988","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19874474,0.00027109482,0.002587453,0.015166416,0.0026966282,0.00018624998,0.0000073020697,0.000028370057,0.78031176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977107,0.000050710576,0.00007761085,0.0007770144,0.001336388,0.0000023960804,0.0000031031213,0.000001980198,0.00004007229],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988454,0.00015516406,0.00020947505,0.000085081454,0.00047677357,0.00022810645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994117,0.000099905985,0.00010868778,0.0000454515,0.00027723846,0.000056985064],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065763335,0.000060520644,0.00008085753,0.000026027732,0.0036038756,0.00014527723,0.00014139545,0.000028251248,0.00021825099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015141304,0.000044806344,0.000023290911,0.0002552553,0.001806877,0.00035039047,0.000021204185,0.00017691393,0.00001878051],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011562256,0.000009550975,0.011348684,3.039573e-7,0.000012454824,0.000012257308,0.00089713297,0.00004733062,0.00001953531,0.9810525,0.0007322266,0.0058564725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047801988,0.000021734215,0.05825231,0.00008729295,0.00002179964,0.00006824719,0.006317667,0.00021559178,0.000034645538,0.0830895,0.8512064,0.00020674526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9678229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99857754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.897963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006265179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037660971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123240813","doi":"","title":"Patterning Rights Constitutionalism: Thirty Years with the Charter","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Charter; Political science; Variety (cybernetics); Law; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; Democracy; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.01619015104397401,"score_gpt":0.24381005635812508,"score_spread":0.22761990531415108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123240813","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024249855,0.0002856851,0.0005961228,0.016854934,0.0004171791,0.00016778015,0.00000464146,0.0000360697,0.95738775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99695903,0.000040201627,0.00015318352,0.0015434314,0.00089402276,0.000013756562,0.0000010170469,0.0000034538552,0.00039190386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988265,0.00012145692,0.00013240783,0.00011152368,0.00051714055,0.00029094977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994445,0.00008104,0.000096162745,0.00006917088,0.00019100169,0.00011813965],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035440057,0.00009113611,0.00011117533,0.000018578656,0.0035135774,0.00027796638,0.00023721116,0.000045686833,0.0011845084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013789472,0.000050540886,0.00006160931,0.00008580668,0.0014182184,0.0003652283,0.000031387583,0.0002779332,0.00039226818],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040902196,0.000016162901,0.0019659514,4.483203e-7,0.0000491062,0.00002439324,0.0013064144,0.0000085821275,0.000010467981,0.9915653,0.0044497214,0.0005994033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053415005,0.000055288125,0.025640098,0.00009307992,0.000055129316,0.00018793558,0.0033429507,0.0000067756696,0.000016520342,0.5394798,0.4302919,0.0002963649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12362947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16796672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9727092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058329057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012448484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123294711","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2012.0021","title":"Electoral fairness and the law of democracy: A structural rights approach to judicial review","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.015573670904401118,"score_gpt":0.25021697575501783,"score_spread":0.2346433048506167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123294711","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.079061344,0.050368816,0.00045392636,0.00449815,0.0005571807,0.0005065494,0.00001647066,0.000017228576,0.8645203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99799585,0.0011771852,0.00036896556,0.00017151482,0.00023715849,7.344939e-8,3.731221e-7,0.000001116338,0.000047771322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991934,0.00017516651,0.00010993489,0.000059797156,0.00028556728,0.0001761572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995117,0.000049378483,0.000121545985,0.000045234032,0.00015407067,0.00011806155],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052184856,0.000059295424,0.00022153916,0.0000063317666,0.0018057559,0.000010070109,0.00020131226,0.000030594423,0.00012845412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024001261,0.000042100994,0.00008370117,0.000042190262,0.0013016535,0.00037661553,0.00006537471,0.00007639093,0.0000011470114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007290074,0.000017188255,0.00077918277,0.00001192951,0.00004808614,5.681126e-7,0.005046377,5.7397506e-7,0.0000039123083,0.9930567,0.0005466949,0.00041590162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004577926,0.00022865091,0.041691095,0.00111477,0.0012080101,0.00011604409,0.035270594,0.000014645589,0.000061649356,0.16325527,0.7516763,0.00078501255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.362905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21997476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9189345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010376791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049455477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123315520","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1294","title":"Charter Values and Administrative Justice","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Public administration","score_opus":0.06732334647677912,"score_gpt":0.36161497194753944,"score_spread":0.2942916254707603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123315520","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007831066,0.10181062,0.00013989188,0.02600921,0.00037489284,0.00040709003,0.000009015131,0.00006699897,0.8703992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8992973,0.0904607,0.00013484107,0.008779405,0.00061255804,0.000032264612,0.0000029681012,0.000004489804,0.0006754848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991571,0.00016671976,0.00013713997,0.00014989039,0.00022436012,0.00016483899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995572,0.00012901473,0.00004456538,0.00007546831,0.00011170851,0.00008205308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063856697,0.00007967502,0.0002040121,0.000006018592,0.00069350435,0.000029789137,0.00009551945,0.000028329696,0.00018938493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028009654,0.00006398971,0.00004395481,0.00007728231,0.00068184535,0.00010984244,0.000031084328,0.000058574413,0.000118443815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012539997,0.000010057568,0.00008279019,0.00016059839,0.000012295541,7.90701e-7,0.0003839087,1.2817616e-8,0.0000023634364,0.9894039,0.006100584,0.0038414684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049622926,0.000026443131,0.00031748405,0.0006624154,0.00012581135,0.0000011431914,0.00021345897,9.886458e-7,0.0000031473944,0.035653334,0.9628499,0.00009625411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00072745304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010452033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9567493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001623739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005975159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5333945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123325995","doi":"10.1016/j.ad.2022.12.004","title":"In Defence of the Courts: A Balanced Judicial Role in Canada's Constitutional Democracy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial activism; Democracy; Political science; Law; Judicial review; Power (physics); Balance (ability); Judicial restraint; Separation of powers; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.010140629026976109,"score_gpt":0.2447480423113869,"score_spread":0.2346074132844108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123325995","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73991066,0.0012482846,0.004824765,0.009961266,0.0014570167,0.00080217543,0.00016357035,0.00002802708,0.24160421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998778,0.00007721413,0.00018894338,0.00060360105,0.00024211037,0.000019599536,0.000005431379,0.0000024062897,0.00008270233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819595,0.00008710843,0.0004906593,0.00021258157,0.0006213661,0.00039231678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881,0.0005232868,0.00017204107,0.00009981986,0.00031358242,0.00008130283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011250959,0.000105879815,0.0002130125,0.0001506141,0.000560601,0.00001174845,0.00030900052,0.00009161428,0.000082109946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017287179,0.00011164133,0.00006745409,0.0008113754,0.0021808727,0.00019842133,0.000049316543,0.00023116462,0.000006092492],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018437247,0.000048280028,0.21938065,0.000004750354,0.000008229967,0.000019219191,0.0004014029,0.0013483512,0.00008877521,0.778339,0.00010986637,0.00023302207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00094556523,0.000006113723,0.5803856,0.00028758004,0.00001688965,0.00003664812,0.002989679,0.00027213778,0.00020363358,0.40157077,0.013015212,0.00027016518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.720235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97201574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37676823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029584349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012483246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99311507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123408160","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1258","title":"Dialogue Theory, Judicial Review, and Judicial Supremacy: A Comment on \"Charter Dialogue Revisted\"","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Terminology; Legislature; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Law; Judicial review; Epistemology; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.02761686577108724,"score_gpt":0.30469977527759967,"score_spread":0.27708290950651243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123408160","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00065229787,0.015163497,0.00063775515,0.038756236,0.0013614091,0.00054494635,0.00003971517,0.000067178444,0.942777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9587987,0.009058547,0.00007226882,0.028832847,0.003128587,0.0000104966975,0.000008995928,0.000014977786,0.00007459957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972086,0.00050229655,0.0005839314,0.00030053983,0.00075004966,0.00065459876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985338,0.00043925023,0.00026275154,0.00014674306,0.00023121678,0.00038628015],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004211523,0.0002505857,0.0005138583,0.000076908414,0.00322407,0.0001494166,0.0003101886,0.00013378168,0.00027349015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046049844,0.0002101441,0.00018736464,0.00021416557,0.0012120153,0.00021314168,0.00010135248,0.00055413286,0.000103689265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108301465,0.00011325597,0.00045640473,0.000020262776,0.00008575298,0.000077982055,0.001068118,3.9417694e-7,0.000015879701,0.9742964,0.01778984,0.005967409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008438629,0.00026238218,0.0027640625,0.0009099428,0.00026785774,0.00007623949,0.0009484422,4.1188656e-7,0.000030513735,0.49597913,0.49746653,0.00045061682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038231254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11361868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9581464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020256078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018071842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123473093","doi":"","title":"Freedom of Expression Adjudication in Europe and America: A Case Study in Comparative Constitutional Architecture","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Freedom of expression; Political science; Expression (computer science); Convention; Doctrine; Scrutiny; Law; Law and economics; Margin of appreciation; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.06735596951260585,"score_gpt":0.3763859665808876,"score_spread":0.3090299970682817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123473093","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9274487,0.00047513386,0.000008482704,0.00043701445,0.00009619541,0.0010587884,0.00004504419,0.000009202616,0.07042147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957342,0.0036088252,0.00028360545,0.000017252394,0.00013497552,0.00016760563,0.000009966693,0.0000048765496,0.000038665028],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99750084,0.00079229893,0.00052771874,0.0005280408,0.00030387292,0.00034723154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874884,0.00062217395,0.00017341731,0.00019527244,0.00017204348,0.000088262306],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013420912,0.00016153803,0.00048164668,0.0004784021,0.00026748527,0.000037154245,0.00025739998,0.00015127963,0.000024377372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005975906,0.00016557689,0.000036527734,0.00037462983,0.003963694,0.00007967237,0.00060187705,0.0009658878,0.0000016791344],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005565776,0.002784776,0.59837127,0.00008880019,0.00015174119,0.0012833967,0.11998688,0.10734731,0.00015793121,0.033795197,0.000056518904,0.13541962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006898201,0.0006890745,0.53290474,0.0024407797,0.000047982696,0.00014118332,0.39499208,0.00443116,0.000059849157,0.022040514,0.03337604,0.0019784183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018247554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09792096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2750052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049122976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012690106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99874693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123493448","doi":"","title":"Constitutionalising the Senate: A Modest Democratic Proposal","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Constitution; Democracy; Political science; Democratic legitimacy; House of Commons; Legitimacy; Law; Ideal (ethics); Separation of powers; Order (exchange); Referendum; Legislation; Law and economics; Power (physics); Sociology; Parliament; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.029111258577923595,"score_gpt":0.296868661474127,"score_spread":0.2677574028962034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123493448","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33145145,0.03212564,0.034094557,0.14364524,0.0031273223,0.000967573,0.000007824444,0.0002528377,0.45432758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968968,0.000912089,0.00005723212,0.00028054867,0.0009556331,0.0000058051755,6.5566945e-7,0.000004073027,0.00088715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976215,0.0002218422,0.00017353,0.0001078104,0.0005886698,0.0012866694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994102,0.0000575309,0.00008645056,0.000059242426,0.00027019085,0.00011637264],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031316788,0.00009061039,0.000107799504,0.00003496153,0.0022473433,0.00010982031,0.0002594246,0.00004662403,0.00000897066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044338248,0.00005842719,0.00006793446,0.00023279326,0.0010416564,0.00023785685,0.00003566281,0.00079283956,0.000054649787],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015467405,0.000021410102,0.0008206856,3.3077308e-7,0.00006148331,0.000003535011,0.0010852428,0.00006879889,0.000011478934,0.99602354,0.00048285016,0.0014051965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023579515,0.00003606406,0.000057984904,0.000013556622,0.00003052686,0.00017007136,0.016592797,0.000032056894,0.000005823504,0.9672856,0.015445294,0.00009443793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002656731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017223885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6654454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001116898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018390594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123508446","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1285","title":"The Bungling of Justice Nadon’s Appointment to the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Nomination; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Parliament; Politics; Chose; Government (linguistics); Supreme Court Decisions; Political question; Majority opinion","score_opus":0.030005130473400515,"score_gpt":0.289306940117719,"score_spread":0.2593018096443185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123508446","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042675994,0.27201596,0.00065117923,0.2906185,0.0031400677,0.0032607808,0.00010211662,0.00005810342,0.4258857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9679582,0.027101357,0.00006497014,0.004193298,0.00035599803,0.000051864157,0.0000017498976,0.0000064717283,0.00026609437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803174,0.00028161326,0.00042194859,0.00015521879,0.00079794077,0.00031154446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99842,0.0005479774,0.00017410467,0.00027083233,0.00049118383,0.00009591508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023559812,0.00011505372,0.00033669197,0.0000074258114,0.0012264681,0.00001725682,0.0005376047,0.000025834668,0.00006232149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010836584,0.000065588676,0.00010027003,0.00023518763,0.00051215355,0.000041709594,0.000107808184,0.00009297119,0.000012686527],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062710697,0.000017196155,0.00009259682,0.00027836807,0.00005541234,5.033568e-7,0.00041625957,0.000022427568,0.000011039483,0.9561301,0.03903652,0.0039333007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051290583,0.00002520533,0.00016033971,0.00086131366,0.00016032987,4.7754486e-7,0.0006224191,0.0000060882358,0.000032715554,0.0027264138,0.9952667,0.000086712935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.50467277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86971664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9636906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012716187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007332177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94331247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123633480","doi":"","title":"Sharpening the Dialogue Debate: The Next Decade of Scholarship","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Humanities; Political science; Constitution; Constitutionality; Charter; Legislature; Interpretation (philosophy); Scholarship; Relation (database); Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.07500833982761843,"score_gpt":0.3243688705626575,"score_spread":0.24936053073503908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123633480","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028290251,0.0039447327,0.0012141055,0.00988344,0.0007914516,0.00014610542,0.0000034058417,0.000021652551,0.95570487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975594,0.00040996462,0.00012105891,0.00077671977,0.0010461953,0.0000019154502,4.1905923e-7,0.0000046143664,0.00007965711],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849325,0.00020911642,0.0002718175,0.0000902492,0.0005808342,0.0003547532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989247,0.00051484973,0.00017240873,0.00009291155,0.00019634016,0.00009883909],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003662114,0.000082921964,0.00012188794,0.000021788792,0.004347562,0.00017784692,0.0005517681,0.00006482551,0.00011858547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004504175,0.00004425548,0.00011702897,0.00021209489,0.0011225472,0.00029472756,0.00007360267,0.00047809436,0.00003082282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000184613,0.000016817383,0.0035015885,7.671631e-7,0.00003803217,0.00001359866,0.0021985008,0.000013043034,0.00013625452,0.9879491,0.00017172689,0.0059421533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003300485,0.000044297583,0.028101353,0.000080575766,0.00007873009,0.00009826546,0.010580856,0.000003640826,0.0006245332,0.85098755,0.10888196,0.0001882134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04891336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3348835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9692692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000061581726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013583034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99694866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123733520","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3037","title":"Dead Hands, Living Trees, Historic Compromises: The Senate Reform and Supreme Court Act References Bring the Originalism Debate to Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Supreme court; Law; Constitution; Politics; Democracy; Political science; Sociology; Dissenting opinion; Judicial review","score_opus":0.028590388946844566,"score_gpt":0.2558691430185515,"score_spread":0.22727875407170695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123733520","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17373022,0.004478438,0.00015465336,0.12433337,0.0019309674,0.00036320815,0.000022373557,0.000055743487,0.69493103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961993,0.0011962682,0.000028951872,0.00075332663,0.00069937506,0.0000059811796,1.8207182e-7,0.0000059213558,0.0011106877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844533,0.00017485427,0.00022113301,0.00016183441,0.0005902618,0.0004065841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991191,0.0002845588,0.0001322149,0.00010697116,0.00016646276,0.0001906981],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097099965,0.00013324944,0.0001698098,0.000021325417,0.0043289927,0.00019918667,0.00042656314,0.000038110767,0.00005201031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013780162,0.000058791673,0.000046959274,0.00012763264,0.00046507842,0.00018586006,0.00009820621,0.00019685797,0.0000073340466],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042749984,0.000021635205,0.006279797,0.000004084711,0.0001373878,0.000044854296,0.004860869,0.00000603766,0.00017285768,0.96425045,0.0067735096,0.01740575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040585123,0.000071959184,0.018756585,0.00049290597,0.00008126273,0.00013600329,0.0060146996,0.0000049971404,0.00006282083,0.036154497,0.93747056,0.0003478416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98011047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9306971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008822898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006366753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99696726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123795090","doi":"10.29173/alr79","title":"&lt;i&gt;R. v. N.S.&lt;/i&gt;: What is Fair in a Trial? The Supreme Court of Canada's Divided Opinion on the Niqab in the Courtroom","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.033681144788722576,"score_gpt":0.282735538016959,"score_spread":0.24905439322823641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123795090","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019994084,0.18513674,8.3893207e-7,0.64252824,0.00084861775,0.0045358073,0.000011219451,0.0000093141225,0.14693516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8498243,0.12978381,0.0000011588835,0.019551769,0.00016742825,0.00039868942,0.0000031606676,0.000005742288,0.00026395105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972519,0.0008953572,0.000489581,0.00021849439,0.0007790512,0.00036561067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99681073,0.0024805546,0.00018964293,0.00035597,0.00011576522,0.000047307258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020364563,0.00016743725,0.0004137107,0.000017356444,0.00065333286,0.000093936804,0.0007702565,0.000055443277,0.00038137427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007818454,0.00007743274,0.00013563897,0.0005282127,0.0006352788,0.00022351793,0.00008020134,0.00018051096,0.000051156283],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037085392,0.00006973976,0.00013105743,0.000046150642,0.000034849898,9.4922524e-7,0.0025584747,0.0000012128552,0.0000040549025,0.90574723,0.08822199,0.0031472172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006295548,0.00003846483,0.0016643846,0.0017120689,0.000023992718,5.8628274e-7,0.00094795495,0.0000030709468,0.000002724681,0.0074214907,0.9874352,0.00012049408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.838317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9774886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8992132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012881983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005588905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50249743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123801536","doi":"","title":"Measuring Judicial Activism on the SupremeCourt of Canada: A Comment onNewfoundland (Treasury Board) v. NAPE","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treasury; Political science; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.05662370584923329,"score_gpt":0.2501783787137477,"score_spread":0.19355467286451442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123801536","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0391559,0.00017355621,0.000015652982,0.014932021,0.0009926803,0.000133101,0.000017599672,0.000010666316,0.9445688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99830574,0.00008324894,0.000020085856,0.0012587963,0.00027189057,0.000004061827,1.6781584e-7,0.0000051476013,0.000050887775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981266,0.00030979287,0.0002267886,0.00010508433,0.00089620735,0.00033548567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999203,0.0002541318,0.00014569153,0.00007902499,0.0001897295,0.0001283909],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011510724,0.00010575261,0.00018400693,0.000023415807,0.007802678,0.000035154324,0.00019199043,0.00003887671,0.00019849635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003391158,0.00007264281,0.00008528674,0.000120474724,0.00034076566,0.00008101965,0.00002213399,0.00026697278,0.000004465871],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029197732,0.00006413201,0.0011883174,0.0000011740711,0.00010352987,0.000015486405,0.00027728386,0.000027716533,0.00002205209,0.99476993,0.0029009774,0.0006002015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002968996,0.000048702866,0.002651946,0.000065187836,0.000030115581,0.000013633132,0.0022548798,8.3698876e-7,0.0004240766,0.019767195,0.9743128,0.00013373772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.74292535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9776827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9750027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000503097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033379695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.993489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123989408","doi":"10.3138/9781487514662-003","title":"1. Introduction: Courts in Federal Countries","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Jurisprudence; Government (linguistics); Law; Public administration; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.025375998151703952,"score_gpt":0.23860930382614323,"score_spread":0.21323330567443927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123989408","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000016964545,0.0022536404,0.0000062470444,0.00046353924,0.00045825023,0.0001642575,0.000035878227,0.000024530375,0.99657667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004749781,0.0026479524,0.000029854913,0.000015642676,0.00081281015,1.8277407e-7,0.000004038877,0.000004864292,0.99173486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992253,0.000021599246,0.0000958204,0.0002045434,0.00030422187,0.00014848972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994156,0.000026738353,0.00018534236,0.00016001366,0.00016276838,0.000049541188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013659884,0.00011951562,0.0002664526,0.000013532892,0.00094877026,0.000030173722,0.00031601058,0.00018704502,0.0006610064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016477263,0.0001480562,0.00008573027,2.2284256e-7,0.0015171791,0.00014958526,0.00013012522,0.00010658982,0.000010353867],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057046007,0.0000056680674,0.00003726167,0.000009826758,0.00006121071,0.000022599861,0.006784743,8.646183e-7,4.3226248e-7,0.9763333,0.014808171,0.0018788325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016692083,0.000015388154,0.00015385098,0.00007157335,0.000027531796,3.6481333e-7,0.00025800557,2.1186759e-7,0.0000015918133,0.008979924,0.99018127,0.00014334873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5820469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6485227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9753731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036619473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002603319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72972697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124025184","doi":"","title":"Canadian Election Administration on Trial: ‘Robocalls’, Opitz and Disputed Elections in the Courts","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Jurisprudence; Administration (probate law); Theme (computing); Law","score_opus":0.01496922481542144,"score_gpt":0.2864169551060437,"score_spread":0.27144773029062225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124025184","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8392158,0.00097947,0.0012042993,0.12652043,0.00078176707,0.000710375,0.0000050143335,0.00003701523,0.03054579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99482954,0.0038176174,0.0000021414412,0.00026987866,0.0005648719,0.000020105505,7.770495e-7,0.0000034353534,0.0004916098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982804,0.00022088115,0.00015296214,0.0001197289,0.00025351738,0.0009724905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962556,0.00012727037,0.0000583066,0.000045633384,0.00006106729,0.00008213357],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015911299,0.000075468415,0.000082322775,0.00011255218,0.0013789258,0.00007445172,0.000117874806,0.00006202504,0.000014716665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023007779,0.000045030705,0.00003768096,0.00023917541,0.00014468339,0.00015101601,0.0000041170715,0.00045334455,0.000010932799],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005380821,0.00004099608,0.0009750571,1.791228e-7,0.000024418903,0.000002406823,0.00037571465,7.6945855e-7,0.000016472726,0.97853893,0.00022369949,0.01926328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0061914595,0.001205072,0.009766082,0.00003659835,0.000032556854,0.000096400014,0.0049582985,0.0000026137047,0.000014878687,0.92361206,0.053881355,0.00020260428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11606961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9583351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8422655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001571283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005344932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124087504","doi":"","title":"Breakdowns in the Democratic Process and the Law of Canadian Democracy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Politics; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01718445039640144,"score_gpt":0.253409698441378,"score_spread":0.23622524804497658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124087504","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48830062,0.007608439,0.00005472089,0.035500027,0.00012713099,0.00036747212,0.0000020999414,0.000007353131,0.46803212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956798,0.00370373,0.000004390823,0.00044904265,0.00009070703,0.000005037125,9.747425e-8,0.0000018061846,0.00006540108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864906,0.00019101927,0.00013841898,0.000058153913,0.00019513277,0.0007682277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969614,0.00009235787,0.00006366634,0.00004193755,0.00006329729,0.000042606825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002467007,0.000051544088,0.00009567606,0.000064975546,0.0011564516,0.000020939135,0.00026401057,0.000027917373,0.000012856467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010848186,0.000026901802,0.00003294719,0.00034056188,0.00096954213,0.000103005776,0.000008844241,0.00047853723,0.0000020979126],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015148537,0.000009918161,0.003988808,6.737218e-7,0.00002235729,0.0000013644517,0.014719901,3.8413893e-7,4.5692093e-7,0.97989917,0.000016967078,0.0013248767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023890004,0.00002438947,0.0048103845,0.000008608998,0.000019045377,0.00003161999,0.04065018,0.0000013804648,0.00000196503,0.95336515,0.000810335,0.000038041217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6610882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97979534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5073792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013405897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027399808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88946074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124169780","doi":"","title":"Judicial Review and American Constitutional Exceptionalism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Exceptionalism; Political science; Judicial activism; Law; Accountability; Politics; Judicial restraint; Constitutional law; Constitutional review; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03989409783912067,"score_gpt":0.3084262071484708,"score_spread":0.2685321093093501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124169780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019474883,0.022890743,0.0004586039,0.017969672,0.00041722218,0.00014741035,0.000020346442,0.000044643777,0.95610386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94170064,0.052381977,0.0004011169,0.0041969283,0.0011400402,0.0000067991564,0.000002824859,0.0000033093065,0.00016638455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986495,0.00014194267,0.00024599218,0.00015071749,0.0005323395,0.00027952675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927163,0.000076648284,0.00014471066,0.000049962437,0.00023608093,0.00022096887],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045721623,0.000108784036,0.00025733493,0.000031125095,0.0042891162,0.00004014459,0.00013804593,0.00003664924,0.0004965721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015120412,0.0000972721,0.00008979434,0.0001694334,0.008248162,0.00023133692,0.000042405583,0.00023302292,0.00007050655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058199425,0.00002892218,0.0015996327,0.0000048593315,0.000036315752,0.000044819797,0.00023163557,0.0000010305758,0.000005013791,0.99142563,0.005468752,0.0011475926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043771142,0.00006782896,0.010662035,0.00028402352,0.00014494733,0.0013894553,0.0006617248,6.7700876e-7,0.0000028529116,0.35012415,0.6358665,0.0003580457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03871239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034024607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9559375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008822963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000383759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124186641","doi":"","title":"Justiciability and the \"Political Question\" Doctrine","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Presumption; Judicial review; Doctrine; Law; Political science; Politics; Parliament; Political question; Discretion; Plaintiff; Law and economics; Scope (computer science); Sociology","score_opus":0.007520437106566744,"score_gpt":0.2927826751554695,"score_spread":0.28526223804890277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124186641","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72214174,0.0026551136,0.0017479691,0.16164497,0.0012747024,0.00028119667,0.0000023021928,0.000062111794,0.11018989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99685866,0.0012662095,0.000025643385,0.00031837702,0.001257353,0.0000041740136,1.5954943e-7,0.0000020091534,0.00026742346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818015,0.0001762805,0.00012958636,0.00008931306,0.00024355188,0.0011810972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943626,0.00026709537,0.00003931165,0.000053467866,0.00011219643,0.000091688395],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003445988,0.000059227492,0.00010069823,0.000018468261,0.0014858623,0.00005987047,0.00014186926,0.000047568104,0.00003671156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012424135,0.0000362096,0.000050401934,0.00009161505,0.0019329966,0.00008532384,0.000031720952,0.0013151314,0.000012425737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037010566,0.000013785504,0.0035790703,3.5531934e-7,0.00002085325,4.2939786e-7,0.00017598075,1.5906583e-7,0.00000789875,0.99180055,0.000016973147,0.004346916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035548088,0.000019340785,0.003246861,0.0000021031174,0.000029437386,0.00004515366,0.0043274947,0.0000038991593,0.000002454008,0.98165727,0.010259884,0.000050645427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057864673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06655703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2747169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018762193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018649865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124242788","doi":"","title":"The Hidden Foreign Law Debate in Heller: The Proportionality Approach in American Constitutional Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital USD (University of San Diego)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Proportionality (law); Constitutional law; Political science; Comparative law; Common law; Adjudication; Public law; Legal history","score_opus":0.021548053123450026,"score_gpt":0.233799701140664,"score_spread":0.21225164801721397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124242788","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19253582,0.00014957268,0.00010403862,0.0025954405,0.00003145489,0.00023175201,0.00003724486,0.000019859704,0.8042948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994896,0.00005105172,0.000036149115,0.00023968154,0.000028922874,7.332779e-7,0.000019242478,0.000001064667,0.0001335652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990726,0.00005997681,0.00012508903,0.00015994835,0.0003536459,0.00022872088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956626,0.0001317062,0.00009235647,0.000086104366,0.00007839224,0.000045170713],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030277617,0.00007757223,0.00015344823,0.00003451222,0.0011394552,0.000051538507,0.000315155,0.000032488253,0.000019387922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003878626,0.000059900904,0.000078493584,0.00042991413,0.008682133,0.000384434,0.000068579175,0.000110725196,0.000008251496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037305028,0.00009939383,0.010376414,0.0000010024974,0.000017906103,0.000008300002,0.0013895733,0.000019955844,0.0000013268807,0.9830387,0.00016579471,0.004844319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000585658,0.000081117,0.3397204,0.000039414164,0.00002782907,0.0000031420577,0.076356284,0.00008721708,0.0000020331051,0.49189967,0.09092572,0.00027150914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015848167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0520231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8069538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012231234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017194667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9940157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124335097","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3291","title":"Strategic Behaviour and Leadership Patterns of Modern Chief Justices","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Supreme court; Voting; Charter; Scholarship; Roberts Court; Political science; Ideology; Period (music); Economic Justice; Law; Task (project management); Majority opinion; Sociology; Management; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.1492124309405392,"score_gpt":0.31797611920990937,"score_spread":0.16876368826937016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124335097","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28544533,0.0021258432,0.0003568778,0.0016748373,0.0004470074,0.000076476004,0.00001574705,0.000022265693,0.70983565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984151,0.00030100974,0.00010553754,0.0001504579,0.0008741236,0.0000012199582,5.3158425e-7,0.0000042022084,0.0001477924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990423,0.00008335959,0.00017939309,0.000110709276,0.000331057,0.00025321255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949425,0.000042514457,0.00012526536,0.000047504524,0.00016773028,0.00012271757],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035488105,0.0000813032,0.00013897345,0.000027890253,0.0013005842,0.00008882986,0.00014967247,0.00006130882,0.00019905622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002383646,0.000068811954,0.00004811829,0.00005623984,0.00094744144,0.00018662194,0.00003146985,0.00015349664,0.000008943696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014879637,0.000044277167,0.025450012,0.0000067544483,0.000030388856,0.000009710598,0.0028772678,0.0000015969869,0.00007431278,0.96979886,0.000025800875,0.0016661132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063386484,0.0003136698,0.05065396,0.00022485295,0.00019116183,0.00006854637,0.03481636,0.000028386783,0.00023953481,0.9116401,0.00086568366,0.0003238785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.064076945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35672644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7129698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024320341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000088906985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124443418","doi":"","title":"Ideological Influences on Governance and Regulation: The Comparative Case of Supreme Courts","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Deference; Supreme court; Corporate governance; Politics; Political science; Separation of powers; Law; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.030273688383477076,"score_gpt":0.3100675920895012,"score_spread":0.2797939037060241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124443418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97917306,0.0026256521,0.00019166703,0.009655059,0.000082291175,0.00007149585,0.000002896748,0.000006593688,0.008191296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964785,0.0028996833,0.000005423952,0.00007291494,0.0001962956,0.0000020211041,3.9553438e-8,9.510577e-7,0.0003441447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897844,0.00013163296,0.0001295995,0.000080022226,0.00022011367,0.00046020304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943817,0.00027279035,0.0001241218,0.000037636924,0.00009746812,0.000029839433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091176474,0.000054426007,0.000102628175,0.000010100658,0.0007896407,0.000014352183,0.00010086076,0.00002895725,0.00003319497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012619591,0.000025540216,0.00003221836,0.000070257905,0.0010357649,0.000111597416,0.00001915667,0.0002101032,0.0000051740362],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031163607,0.000011313827,0.0054343864,2.0360994e-7,0.000032878805,0.0000048996276,0.0006969808,0.0000038107187,0.000039684062,0.9885177,0.00007027671,0.0051567033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026258396,0.00021206922,0.036089968,0.000033817178,0.000016820875,0.0003139393,0.0053978586,0.0000018570041,0.000045444252,0.95139295,0.006157104,0.00007556012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015304305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019279115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03712472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016149128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006511186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99861646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124474087","doi":"10.1017/s0021223715000187","title":"The Canadian Override: Constitutional Model or<i>Bête Noire</i>of Constitutional Politics?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Knesset; Supreme court; Legitimacy; Politics; Political science; Law; Legislature; Section (typography); Law and economics; Sociology; Parliament","score_opus":0.05925652900322724,"score_gpt":0.3300560492398081,"score_spread":0.2707995202365808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124474087","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010672935,0.063163795,0.0010735118,0.059251614,0.0007277001,0.0006718585,0.0006999744,0.00005029792,0.8742545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9401366,0.04885479,0.00015746096,0.00898547,0.0003469559,0.000060022026,0.000007561788,0.000004032562,0.0014470811],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821603,0.00011748843,0.00039837338,0.00020136213,0.00059285865,0.0004738837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862033,0.00042524826,0.00012834849,0.00017453289,0.00038113762,0.00027042528],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076135504,0.00014165882,0.0002829345,0.000023597611,0.003269999,0.00003791849,0.0003423333,0.000074169984,0.00024736408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005737958,0.0000747829,0.00014936794,0.00017810127,0.018663349,0.00018693758,0.000052965883,0.00008833147,0.00019847328],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040376553,0.000011623841,0.00032217326,0.00003124822,0.000042155152,0.0000049530368,0.00001821069,0.0000027825433,0.000003852325,0.98971325,0.008989705,0.0008560072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013275148,0.0000075002554,0.000057316698,0.0009582539,0.000054204866,0.000008311654,0.000025678088,0.000002945686,0.000005517878,0.08116243,0.91745204,0.00013305013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18021151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.66889066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9400299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038773174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006507857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99912435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124490563","doi":"","title":"Reducing the Democratic Deficit: Representation, Diversity and the Canadian Judiciary or Towards a 'Triple P' Judiciary","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Politics; Judicial independence; Diversity (politics); Law; Judicial discretion; Statute; Judicial review; Democratic deficit; Representation (politics); Judicial activism; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.022497020180617083,"score_gpt":0.2709536953357629,"score_spread":0.24845667515514583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124490563","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7394343,0.015284002,0.00013806984,0.10100004,0.0005148978,0.0006632788,0.0000067361207,0.000048067723,0.14291061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818334,0.015060588,0.0000061426913,0.0010770762,0.0005542692,0.000007081826,7.5336055e-7,0.000004649561,0.0014560567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99747604,0.00041257933,0.00020477815,0.0001626946,0.0004737956,0.0012701153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993771,0.00019764376,0.00008478231,0.000100265344,0.000112843736,0.00012740353],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031849253,0.00010621126,0.00016496371,0.00005404266,0.01832347,0.00011309778,0.0003641052,0.00005982475,0.00017137217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041614848,0.000058796308,0.00008444192,0.00042245287,0.0011918234,0.00019346956,0.00009503689,0.00087168225,0.00001684723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025175058,0.000024905617,0.0147469025,0.0000010939034,0.00033948143,0.00002088548,0.020313617,0.000056338613,9.3834245e-7,0.8971936,0.00218648,0.06486398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006333473,0.000040286144,0.02491604,0.000018436342,0.0001220635,0.00010923083,0.020076944,0.000036542133,6.660458e-7,0.94980127,0.00411973,0.00012543696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.859885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9546031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24239908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091745215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063696112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99926335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124562826","doi":"","title":"Positive Obligations Under Sections 15 And 7 Of The Charter: A Comment On Gosselin V. Québec","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Constitutionality; Legitimacy; Entitlement (fair division); Political science; Jurisprudence; Law; Minor (academic); Law and economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.024205134302937838,"score_gpt":0.2784689327453998,"score_spread":0.25426379844246194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124562826","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19326493,0.00019896925,0.0003584636,0.16161108,0.00024521444,0.0002712432,0.000018474972,0.000021947495,0.64400965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995851,0.00003614648,0.000015653322,0.0032120144,0.000024477618,0.000008075113,2.1269302e-7,8.2672545e-7,0.00085162866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963534,0.00006769896,0.00006112097,0.000056360346,0.00011385877,0.000065623215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997627,0.000105161205,0.000021223559,0.00003657597,0.00005233444,0.000021961685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010109698,0.000031169966,0.00004468497,0.000012179913,0.0008733527,0.000010039936,0.000033704644,0.000016358921,0.00007951959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054719836,0.000020285197,0.000025788373,0.00012522521,0.0004204326,0.000026817681,0.000010959494,0.000035247744,0.000008209048],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.414599e-7,0.00003508089,0.003337893,2.421913e-7,0.000015323905,3.2420427e-8,0.0022752024,0.000006840021,0.000015610867,0.9917684,0.0024423515,0.000102046564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052216963,0.00013091114,0.23865584,0.00006881883,0.000074665615,0.0000020348718,0.065879114,0.000008050177,0.0017702121,0.2891932,0.40344542,0.00024955528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10822378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21592647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.802586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004749501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016298269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8977146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124590460","doi":"","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada Crumbles Mr. Christie's Cookie","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Taxpayer; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Charter; Appeal; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.01639240125532161,"score_gpt":0.26067066381317694,"score_spread":0.24427826255785534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124590460","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15350108,0.0049556564,0.00008579912,0.008678166,0.0015028382,0.00027467887,0.00004038048,0.000056198656,0.8309052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996298,0.00023679946,0.00003863705,0.00055961567,0.0004949824,0.000005511287,0.0000016013369,0.0000044052467,0.0023604266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849075,0.000057578454,0.00024353535,0.00013664537,0.00064124225,0.00043026483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999047,0.00035964738,0.0000896413,0.00013006025,0.00020994883,0.00016369153],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093494216,0.00009129233,0.00014902293,0.000011617931,0.0020515367,0.000040918047,0.00030639363,0.000054103457,0.00014374571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037858827,0.000069276844,0.000053063024,0.00018602365,0.0010357421,0.000082370934,0.00005362003,0.0001294113,0.000022201479],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002185285,0.00001659408,0.008588496,0.0000026914843,0.00003472696,0.000009152304,0.00022313942,0.0000057083957,0.000051316805,0.9567852,0.033509567,0.00075157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012081469,0.000014199609,0.01363683,0.000019814519,0.000011721458,6.160203e-7,0.0027077447,7.8954014e-7,0.00034374068,0.013165035,0.96986824,0.00011046094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94097626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99541736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94362015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019134665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011646678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99924767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124660054","doi":"10.1017/s002058931100042x","title":"INTERNATIONALISATION AND CONSTITUTIONAL BORROWING IN DRAFTING BILLS OF RIGHTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Centre for Engineering Research and Development; Government of the United Kingdom","keywords":"Indigenous; Internationalization; Context (archaeology); Political science; Key (lock); Northern ireland; Indigenous rights; Law and economics; Human rights; Focus (optics); Law; Public administration; Sociology; Business; International trade; Geography; Computer science; Ethnology","score_opus":0.08964935228637383,"score_gpt":0.32107300415363627,"score_spread":0.23142365186726244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124660054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6973323,0.00018586553,0.00092644704,0.00034642924,0.00034585028,0.00011079989,0.000021752541,0.000014772006,0.30071574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994065,0.000014846652,0.00031748693,0.00007730377,0.00010970529,0.000011972872,0.0000059175204,8.6465565e-7,0.00005540283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921995,0.00006366466,0.00023158042,0.00014779426,0.00023931827,0.00009766749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995195,0.000117199015,0.00008530692,0.000025953297,0.00021419472,0.000037818307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020478615,0.00007409426,0.00013324714,0.0000779363,0.00023012355,0.000026822012,0.000090484464,0.000032235963,0.0000998405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015036501,0.000067284855,0.000024179766,0.0000750596,0.0025234225,0.0003538145,0.00001852053,0.00006142229,0.000004519336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027328102,0.000048686194,0.019267023,0.0000011474195,0.000032112333,0.0000023592581,0.025403095,0.0000011287025,0.00006882175,0.95469713,0.000011487661,0.00043966857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008213469,0.0001375924,0.09973583,0.00015308007,0.000014923877,0.0000068291706,0.011735781,0.00018707161,0.00037119188,0.8717066,0.014888437,0.00024132627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013826636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007320786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30207416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038244267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041359068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9927404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124689136","doi":"","title":"Travelling in Constitutional Circles: The Paradox of Tribunal Independence","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Separation of powers; Independence (probability theory); Judicial independence; Sociology; Constitution; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03010718239465562,"score_gpt":0.26895739826666126,"score_spread":0.23885021587200564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124689136","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20104606,0.075011514,0.30526856,0.14190692,0.00824134,0.0023769557,0.00229134,0.00014365179,0.26371366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99203867,0.0045493725,0.00033942235,0.00028744704,0.0009070491,0.00006633704,0.000010261463,0.0000056302033,0.0017958338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970356,0.00030250818,0.00080369285,0.0004117017,0.00088944053,0.00055703346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99693245,0.001733474,0.0003430901,0.00017807854,0.0006764902,0.0001364155],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019862652,0.00021860577,0.0003807899,0.00019873823,0.0008587202,0.00003317015,0.00048821236,0.00032274643,0.0006032251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001829159,0.00018553209,0.00022245961,0.00112944,0.014675211,0.0004920072,0.00006643144,0.00034140574,0.0001626364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035306148,0.00020522732,0.016812166,0.000033888045,0.00007944942,0.000027851169,0.001008845,0.0009165278,0.0001670829,0.9698457,0.0002042796,0.0106636705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019538316,0.000048467366,0.05050155,0.0023351342,0.00013114691,0.00024737892,0.0020438263,0.0004106213,0.00024591148,0.8610071,0.0805144,0.00056061737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00179416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020567477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79099256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012383513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036657276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9880063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124702976","doi":"","title":"Structure, Substance and Spirit: Lessons in Constitutional Architecture from the Senate Reform Reference","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional law; Political science; Architecture; Meaning (existential); Constitutional theory; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.0988614719397214,"score_gpt":0.3319382043452743,"score_spread":0.23307673240555293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124702976","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05991742,0.3070877,0.0024565835,0.25962743,0.0023653717,0.0042563225,0.014420876,0.00035821498,0.3495101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810332,0.013745295,0.00012246042,0.004398326,0.00039975974,0.00007224581,0.0001455446,0.00000652196,0.00007666213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996305,0.0006228423,0.00063306803,0.0006090496,0.0012137118,0.0006163618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99725217,0.00073490024,0.00025084408,0.00041645035,0.0010606052,0.0002850135],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013896574,0.00040776326,0.00057506806,0.000042901982,0.0019817057,0.00015704254,0.0008520819,0.00016414863,0.00020114314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010002072,0.00024976904,0.000114960785,0.0004654381,0.025578672,0.0005071013,0.0002509098,0.0007668069,0.000049663002],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007092295,0.000038551916,0.0006090283,0.000025473555,0.000048930997,0.00005255225,0.0008943429,0.000035154317,0.000019019195,0.9954997,0.0020930676,0.0006133121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073078234,0.00006208053,0.0019067585,0.0020296408,0.00016041486,0.00022544514,0.0038345144,0.00001264484,0.000032766053,0.27968618,0.7106822,0.0006365481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046856645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16029495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92111576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000358645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025055169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124704963","doi":"","title":"Extending Charter Benefits to Canada’s Poor","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Politics; Supreme court; Realm; State (computer science); Constitution; Law; Social rights; Legislature; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02560256823575199,"score_gpt":0.29796505611606483,"score_spread":0.27236248788031286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124704963","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040442914,0.0026926843,0.00004459634,0.032292522,0.0013704251,0.0003068484,0.000019865498,0.00013173901,0.9226984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901124,0.000071758266,0.000068579255,0.0033733293,0.0013173155,0.00001496282,0.0000027525043,0.0000061144497,0.0050327764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985553,0.000056100445,0.00019361515,0.00028682215,0.00037274393,0.0005354051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926335,0.000067516616,0.000037914495,0.00011837597,0.00020135855,0.00031150423],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026066822,0.00015111713,0.00020492506,0.00006081103,0.0013078861,0.00006335514,0.00028920706,0.00006356301,0.00021982654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002016589,0.0001457484,0.00006178813,0.00041065412,0.00012791489,0.00010205675,0.000052982006,0.00010763898,0.00050003896],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013638226,0.0000767963,0.0007143061,0.0000023645596,0.000024029843,0.000010332332,0.0042788656,0.000007894259,0.00012369109,0.822948,0.06389908,0.10790101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012796982,0.000038746784,0.022529863,0.0000427994,0.000014066445,0.0000011578421,0.0009195685,0.0000036508604,0.00012882704,0.0037174476,0.97223043,0.00024545376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4066642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95608926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9496695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032617597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010151432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124724754","doi":"","title":"The Supreme Court and the New Judicial Independence","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial independence; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Lawmaking; Judicial activism; Separation of powers; Judicial review; Certiorari; Legitimacy; Legislature; Parliament; Judicial opinion; Independence (probability theory); Original jurisdiction; Politics","score_opus":0.013391103463444841,"score_gpt":0.27226323225304316,"score_spread":0.2588721287895983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124724754","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13847594,0.27684483,0.005547476,0.31833717,0.004583211,0.0008447558,0.0000025413258,0.00010125998,0.2552628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96580756,0.029515972,0.000004742481,0.00027663496,0.0027556622,0.0000029636415,7.901813e-8,0.0000031205298,0.0016332458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975413,0.00020364125,0.00013616253,0.00006653223,0.000492673,0.0015597002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994167,0.0002723275,0.000081347,0.00005419587,0.00007061749,0.000104830295],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051989253,0.00007224827,0.000095395946,0.0000142553445,0.00403192,0.00011049051,0.00027673345,0.00004672439,0.000017361266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038325012,0.000036985275,0.00005885478,0.0001219612,0.0011163269,0.00021221988,0.000053315187,0.0009359274,0.00002512094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044509932,0.000006190244,0.0031442398,9.091499e-8,0.0000538811,1.6529626e-7,0.0019265815,3.2412777e-7,0.0000020162952,0.978743,0.0008579878,0.015220978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037624512,0.000018731738,0.0023613698,0.00000392704,0.000030294079,0.0000423328,0.011734198,0.0000010549817,0.0000017161813,0.8264193,0.15894912,0.000061708866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007182923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040646367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82733166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026965604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027541644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99942833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124884951","doi":"","title":"Law's Ambition and the Reconstruction of Role Moralityin Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; International law","score_opus":0.011589309574514189,"score_gpt":0.23826144138111421,"score_spread":0.22667213180660004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124884951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4585933,0.0017742797,0.0000472122,0.028063739,0.0006271055,0.00013735142,0.000018901668,0.000016141496,0.5107219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99820554,0.0002897899,0.000089267975,0.00076300855,0.00060778996,0.0000015834195,4.168696e-7,0.0000015965597,0.000041022708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999283,0.00011933902,0.00016047551,0.000053138396,0.00026230028,0.0001217112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996567,0.000058721256,0.00010118547,0.00003272794,0.000100273515,0.000050389783],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004984385,0.000042715987,0.00010072491,0.000008255914,0.0015533433,0.00004144191,0.00007016707,0.000024569228,0.000060473576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034024997,0.000029580247,0.000030756248,0.000060618197,0.0012018031,0.00015987006,0.000017360684,0.000109980916,0.0000012191148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022544667,0.0000066038833,0.0005966397,7.2441395e-7,0.000018082,0.0000012167746,0.0010104445,0.000016098811,0.00001751125,0.9860063,0.00028979167,0.01201401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013694064,0.000024978415,0.00549547,0.000056801724,0.0000698588,0.00017067681,0.014148511,0.000043721448,0.00028558017,0.32732067,0.65083194,0.0001823951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9260044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99165314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6586857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007374147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001931455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124905978","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1100","title":"The End of Umpire?: Federalism and Judicial Restraint","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Supreme court; Ultra vires; Law; Political science; Constitution; Judicial review; Jurisdiction; Statute; Justiciability; Separation of powers; Legislature; Legislation; Jurisprudence; Original jurisdiction; Federal jurisdiction; Human rights; Doctrine","score_opus":0.030955360206700148,"score_gpt":0.30748826681018404,"score_spread":0.2765329066034839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124905978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004971145,0.38103327,0.000012459376,0.055889435,0.00036488444,0.0005648574,0.000018172605,0.000039939707,0.55710584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89617324,0.10224231,0.000027518472,0.0009838744,0.0003768334,0.000016121008,0.0000022423012,0.000003161388,0.00017471067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898493,0.00012670118,0.0002487499,0.000117906675,0.000330218,0.00019148682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995256,0.00014504221,0.00008555262,0.00008701305,0.000119540055,0.000037231737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007729081,0.000075246084,0.0002071799,0.0000060110656,0.001253864,0.000034149503,0.00013541317,0.000031744432,0.000058245212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012526195,0.000050558596,0.000070513335,0.000106738415,0.0019131824,0.000060369057,0.00004437994,0.00006339104,0.000010637054],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019489455,0.000009603549,0.0001844266,0.000042095886,0.0000106076095,0.0000013895564,0.0000625051,9.055232e-8,0.00000958919,0.98880243,0.0059790676,0.004896255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000507958,0.000009331481,0.0016424239,0.00040022863,0.000034582463,0.0000010539633,0.00006509107,1.8936045e-7,0.0000072112643,0.10170257,0.89602363,0.000062890984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041140392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045841165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8912021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025659987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011968719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9715697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124914215","doi":"10.21991/c9zd49","title":"The Manual of Official Procedure of the Government of Canada: An Exposé","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Political science; Politics; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Constitutional interpretation; Work (physics); Isolation (microbiology); Constitutional law; Engineering; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023274348880416247,"score_gpt":0.24181212346937886,"score_spread":0.21853777458896262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124914215","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29296848,0.0026608934,0.0047123474,0.008692603,0.0061596124,0.0021848322,0.0016828601,0.00007484849,0.6808635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99929094,0.00008379742,0.00012916962,0.00017276693,0.000106935964,0.000033236443,0.0000040953996,0.0000040730483,0.00017500747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967093,0.00013379038,0.0007423011,0.00025283342,0.0016487243,0.00051305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998195,0.00020611845,0.00053626293,0.0003027778,0.0006302084,0.00012965838],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006114606,0.00020191887,0.00032859133,0.000033705524,0.0026627653,0.000012165957,0.0007557837,0.00011857912,0.000093512244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008455892,0.00013501159,0.00020088947,0.00039332698,0.017842177,0.00025277355,0.00021747417,0.0001691603,0.0000014905658],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013092946,0.00016396846,0.033818237,0.000012903768,0.00009131496,0.0000017455025,0.00068481656,0.00009168856,0.00017003472,0.9630739,0.001242866,0.00051755534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003490629,0.0005603068,0.14459081,0.001135588,0.0006016417,0.0000824288,0.17603226,0.00018852318,0.029930385,0.34396967,0.29773653,0.001681229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10238413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47976577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70632243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033246476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011430098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99863565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125035025","doi":"10.21991/c93x1k","title":"Purposive Interpretation, Quebec, and the Supreme Court Act","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Supreme court; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Point (geometry); Sociology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.012454290916723192,"score_gpt":0.25396228198520937,"score_spread":0.24150799106848617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125035025","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012725695,0.00841411,0.073356345,0.2828725,0.004717178,0.008083365,0.00019110678,0.00059087755,0.60904884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926286,0.0005313648,0.00027649305,0.0039764615,0.00033591152,0.001088319,0.000039757982,0.000007633225,0.001115507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971324,0.0002527576,0.000583147,0.0004950513,0.0007388996,0.0007977217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976751,0.0007357236,0.00021375177,0.00025099883,0.00083428586,0.0002901235],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064859574,0.00033996868,0.00042342188,0.00015196294,0.0054681166,0.00043725583,0.00046575276,0.00019446778,0.000736692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012600746,0.00025283135,0.00023317117,0.00041811584,0.0360281,0.0013570572,0.00025213268,0.00033360207,0.00064773555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008750384,0.0000459964,0.008798703,0.000005029461,0.00013944368,0.0000047840326,0.00086787087,0.00006774016,0.000020558065,0.97176516,0.014734873,0.0034623507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028228455,0.00003199832,0.0042317607,0.00015940738,0.00013999754,0.000085298525,0.016345704,0.0005860246,0.000029107017,0.37679914,0.59812546,0.0006432758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03141221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025511809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97990286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003125358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002103036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125088037","doi":"","title":"The Conventions of Constitutional Amendment in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Constitution; Law; Democratic legitimacy; Convention; Political science; Democracy; Constitutional amendment; Legitimacy; Politics; Supreme court; Sociology","score_opus":0.02346169341973896,"score_gpt":0.2687058494116898,"score_spread":0.24524415599195082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125088037","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08446451,0.00044540127,0.0007535656,0.045647133,0.0006913932,0.00017661441,0.000029119134,0.000009856458,0.8677824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99892783,0.00020064859,0.000008064423,0.00007409739,0.000023879706,0.000007725514,1.2216537e-7,2.3992206e-7,0.0007573965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995556,0.000027456234,0.00009547757,0.000039612016,0.00018456529,0.000097313845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996766,0.00020774675,0.000021587619,0.000025749476,0.000047588277,0.000020771464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015128143,0.000020327092,0.00003860012,0.000007326532,0.0003320014,0.0000029251019,0.0000647303,0.0000065332747,0.00021280383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000088948625,0.000010037037,0.0000139988015,0.00006788713,0.0013488033,0.000026328162,0.000014395716,0.000012178273,0.0000067140886],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016624366,0.000004887245,0.030959096,1.2414114e-7,0.0000048883576,4.473494e-7,0.00003678915,5.753444e-7,0.000022687967,0.9660789,0.001315028,0.0015749299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036058202,0.000008191419,0.055593494,0.00004062441,0.0000051178185,3.7095e-7,0.0075369356,7.525965e-7,0.00024361874,0.14736755,0.7887523,0.000090457375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9722921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99842334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91446334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002675767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025181067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49697217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125166712","doi":"10.1017/s0021223716000029","title":"Juxtaposing Constitution-Making and Constitutional-Infringement Mechanisms in Israel and Canada: On the Interplay between Common Law Override and Sunset Override","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Legislature; Common law; Political science; Constitutional law; Delegation; Judicial review; Separation of powers; Parliamentary sovereignty; Politics; Parliament","score_opus":0.02927075477351136,"score_gpt":0.3191953073681385,"score_spread":0.2899245525946271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125166712","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24444821,0.15451017,0.0018129008,0.1261356,0.0013780275,0.004367453,0.0008055083,0.0001666926,0.46637544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9778191,0.013155766,0.000041047482,0.008850345,0.00007811504,0.000031928583,0.0000026359364,0.000003580543,0.000017477345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848616,0.00019777377,0.00034966556,0.00029812136,0.00037276268,0.00029549337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987494,0.0008461303,0.00012429731,0.00011986184,0.000060952607,0.00009938351],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088577165,0.00018466146,0.00038359687,0.000024203442,0.0011818261,0.00006868911,0.00012939339,0.000052273543,0.000021692093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019710281,0.00011651216,0.000034302262,0.0001000966,0.004403876,0.0001952668,0.00014882264,0.00012805636,0.000004465084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005677662,0.000008231677,0.010497713,0.00006398779,0.00003660973,0.00001224717,0.000051648425,2.1628239e-7,0.00001435892,0.98737186,0.00028578326,0.0016516857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006527012,0.000061239,0.0066816127,0.018333988,0.0002161676,0.000028461422,0.0010493817,0.000002138491,0.00007222322,0.15550399,0.8168016,0.00059646997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6493724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8734071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8318679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029032596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031184757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99830556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125174861","doi":"","title":"Avoiding the Common Wisdom Fallacy: The Role of Social Sciences in Constitutional Adjudication","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Margin of appreciation; Fallacy; Argument (complex analysis); Legislator; Political science; Supreme court; Empirical evidence; Law; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Common law; Constitutional review; Order (exchange); Sociology; Politics; Economics; Legislation; Epistemology; Fundamental rights; Human rights","score_opus":0.07628490587999803,"score_gpt":0.36142211691821013,"score_spread":0.2851372110382121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125174861","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25295645,0.0010263534,0.0000018936003,0.003949125,0.00028249665,0.00063966966,0.000029255176,0.000013262997,0.7411015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994267,0.005112196,0.000021242931,0.00008474497,0.00029086432,0.00014197797,0.000005724597,0.0000044565963,0.00007181308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99709255,0.0011063855,0.0004531724,0.00037823076,0.00049577246,0.0004739073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980842,0.0013329923,0.00022592842,0.00019023164,0.00013470254,0.000031984895],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007682808,0.00013320774,0.0002901933,0.00019112747,0.0029514832,0.0000864805,0.0011149348,0.00020372572,0.000055327193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009768442,0.00009713514,0.00011426681,0.00031083057,0.016903404,0.00009828606,0.0007779304,0.0012686658,0.000006804006],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027643,0.00006539922,0.0255199,0.0000064491032,0.000031728185,0.0000011640855,0.00988781,0.0004896148,0.000016495414,0.93188626,0.000028550914,0.032039005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033536623,0.00003867444,0.067975014,0.00024534395,0.00001810711,0.0000022070217,0.07809827,0.0005119793,0.00009137288,0.76372236,0.088586986,0.0003743486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012118429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026067507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74131054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005589262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023955784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99834657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125195555","doi":"","title":"General Legitimacy of Judicial Review and the Fundamental Basis of Constitutional Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Legitimacy; Constitutional interpretation; Normative; Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional theory; Judicial review; Legislation; Constitutional review; Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.012671599790233093,"score_gpt":0.2045186402159796,"score_spread":0.19184704042574652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125195555","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27749225,0.14172724,0.00016303813,0.0063417694,0.00046934176,0.0007396698,0.00013400232,0.000053120897,0.57287955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862949,0.0117986435,0.00016970631,0.0005710169,0.00012878458,0.00001148626,0.000007136651,0.0000025664312,0.0010157042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986225,0.00016065029,0.00028880133,0.00018515978,0.000546802,0.00019609836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991918,0.00015073741,0.00020293689,0.000108516375,0.00024120249,0.00010479169],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032455707,0.00012374953,0.00033550482,0.000050022023,0.0076984917,0.000006985999,0.00020030243,0.00006426845,0.00005559003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000090262445,0.00010466377,0.00017240593,0.00022225172,0.014648626,0.00020206708,0.00014479757,0.000104705556,0.0000046419386],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016546897,0.00005987737,0.010430167,0.000032554777,0.00013214805,0.00005954284,0.004911684,0.000024267609,0.00019965638,0.98317426,0.0006221082,0.00018825136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0120466845,0.0003039282,0.10423643,0.0015751235,0.0024937976,0.0025238323,0.0370174,0.00014129873,0.004727199,0.04891015,0.7844869,0.001537285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15112452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005929512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9342641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005609214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001260981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99359334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125326458","doi":"","title":"Bills of Rights in Functioning Parliamentary Democracies: Kantian, Consequentialist and Institutionalist Scepticisms","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Constitution; Parliamentary sovereignty; Law; Bill of rights; Political science; Statute; Law and economics; Politics; Constitutional law; Sociology; Parliament","score_opus":0.011610530064060478,"score_gpt":0.26943553986065566,"score_spread":0.2578250097965952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125326458","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97991866,0.0013738385,0.0005450468,0.0024129075,0.00072988105,0.000116525654,0.0000057534326,0.000015097792,0.014882311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99809563,0.0012411015,0.00009104952,0.00009368002,0.00033753106,0.0000036958384,0.000002230036,0.0000026654761,0.00013242828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983476,0.00008272219,0.00028219773,0.00013817385,0.0003202516,0.0008291013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955213,0.00007888977,0.00013186292,0.00005096818,0.00011670283,0.0000694239],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014302463,0.000092712784,0.00016443382,0.000116833995,0.0011386694,0.000048276754,0.00012991282,0.000071646195,0.00010197964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013766967,0.0000802503,0.00005574899,0.00022594702,0.0014989594,0.00026317357,0.00002928427,0.0008422206,0.0000062748604],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023732471,0.0000440089,0.02414372,0.0000014562967,0.000052830244,0.0000040754335,0.00048924965,0.0000062987788,0.0008107424,0.9729988,0.000044829976,0.0013802351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000539133,0.00006642263,0.0084829535,0.00004339557,0.00003707679,0.00010328301,0.0062510343,0.000004329538,0.00010520561,0.96407765,0.020132989,0.00015651982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043565374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3793816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33581623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002624759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021353725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9628036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125327145","doi":"10.32920/22341316.v1","title":"Experimenting with Credibility in Refugee Adjudication: Gaydar","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; York University","keywords":"Refugee; Credibility; Persecution; Adjudication; Plaintiff; Immigration; Refugee law; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.10417704146878773,"score_gpt":0.37531683090532303,"score_spread":0.2711397894365353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125327145","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2808323,0.0012942356,0.0009300303,0.013105205,0.0011442982,0.00094406534,0.000018129498,0.00058774254,0.701144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99709755,0.00020131981,0.00051203783,0.00010195835,0.0004138456,0.00014779886,0.000010936509,0.0000066399093,0.0015078959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853,0.000103737795,0.00023166223,0.00041443418,0.00046199013,0.0002581762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994482,0.00009611526,0.00009448331,0.00018821814,0.00011693015,0.000056063698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077857455,0.00012065872,0.00021431026,0.00006949809,0.00044383976,0.00005568869,0.00024760677,0.00013548475,0.00018539758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022362813,0.000102715574,0.0000495019,0.00028939507,0.0006143781,0.00006189751,0.00037438824,0.0002589464,0.00009404258],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004984443,0.00018045679,0.1876262,0.00004530863,0.00011779291,0.00003114758,0.016049355,0.0005200263,0.0000110698065,0.7896626,0.0035029894,0.0022032284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074490695,0.00006750549,0.3756531,0.0009880505,0.00007513748,7.508198e-7,0.048507053,0.00016612645,0.00013211933,0.47143036,0.100869834,0.0013650472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056059312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06958916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71626526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022019427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006194793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9502265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125335885","doi":"","title":"How Harper Will Reshape Canada's Courts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Charter; Political science; Bill of rights; Constitution; Separation of powers; Legislature; Judicial review; Judicial activism; Judicial independence; Government (linguistics); State (computer science)","score_opus":0.04375840710499277,"score_gpt":0.2600118247841899,"score_spread":0.21625341767919712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125335885","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01831803,0.0031183967,0.000048914553,0.0066606086,0.0016132185,0.00022347039,0.000021787951,0.00012345529,0.9698721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822042,0.00015286896,0.0000994735,0.00050421304,0.00097210676,0.000029457553,0.0000033315164,0.000011343256,0.01602303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984797,0.00011287909,0.00016445834,0.00030123343,0.0004174124,0.0005242853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990732,0.00008793847,0.00006738073,0.00017011179,0.00035154674,0.0002498146],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028822428,0.00017239332,0.00022489553,0.00004134378,0.0013417383,0.00006837144,0.00036559242,0.00010157646,0.0007100796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003112134,0.00015780184,0.0000780088,0.0002705692,0.00077315717,0.00028559455,0.00010587291,0.00015891597,0.0001841938],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019563116,0.000104557635,0.006618016,0.0000068370823,0.00007486801,0.000030634146,0.009759657,1.5521803e-7,0.000028645083,0.85947454,0.118051894,0.0058306134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001512978,0.000019183946,0.010112609,0.000022986078,0.000025535985,0.0000013334663,0.0027351384,0.0000027479193,0.00009450046,0.011506417,0.9750867,0.00024157533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7404581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97407025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96388614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025088873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016163244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125402060","doi":"10.32920/22227784.v1","title":"Shouldn’t the bench be a mirror? The diversity of the Canadian judiciary","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Meritocracy; Compromise; Objectivity (philosophy); Diversity (politics); Political science; Population; Economic Justice; Composition (language); Public administration; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08403152688698305,"score_gpt":0.3017344156809138,"score_spread":0.21770288879393074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125402060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18348245,0.000116797535,8.6723253e-7,0.23968518,0.00050294254,0.00024193157,0.000024851566,0.000033498345,0.57591146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99487966,0.000060711784,0.0000014594642,0.0034562333,0.000066394714,0.0000051030197,5.4957883e-7,0.0000011672431,0.0015287183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991248,0.00010664251,0.000067609,0.00007649275,0.00040933286,0.00021511405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956596,0.00017585079,0.000026938233,0.000116093666,0.00006915107,0.000046014207],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006206938,0.00004447392,0.000058748963,0.000018247727,0.0071472023,0.000019933372,0.0005353489,0.000035372643,0.00022431898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015169867,0.000018991113,0.00007257751,0.0006019871,0.0014663382,0.000036238816,0.00031962505,0.00009430706,0.000041581334],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015384244,0.000005845895,0.100239456,5.408874e-7,0.00003683795,0.0000014420161,0.014231024,0.000003443845,0.0000038880594,0.81798023,0.067000486,0.0004952353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003811049,0.000004479387,0.7073524,0.000004590762,0.000026185971,1.79161e-7,0.023578135,0.000006229068,0.000008896135,0.0651884,0.20373787,0.00005452733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9784298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99620265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8113972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007787676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051687536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99414533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125451397","doi":"","title":"Does Canada Need a Political Questions Doctrine","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Politics; Doctrine; Political question; Constitution; Political science; Jurisdiction; Law; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04879384909013636,"score_gpt":0.30121665232459816,"score_spread":0.2524228032344618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125451397","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012103969,0.043873902,0.0005931688,0.24346396,0.0022234034,0.0016470824,0.002536729,0.00027208132,0.7041793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97730994,0.011017795,0.00004297622,0.009473314,0.0006860491,0.00011294734,0.00003422834,0.000006631741,0.0013160917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964909,0.00044812766,0.00057586166,0.00043353092,0.0012100415,0.00084151985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970676,0.00079354714,0.0001509376,0.0003458542,0.0012302204,0.00041185447],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006586046,0.00032744958,0.00050172315,0.000034646408,0.0030051575,0.00010504519,0.0006479138,0.00009149265,0.0026621216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015281648,0.00019421882,0.00018299163,0.00039967246,0.009461297,0.00038567398,0.00017354666,0.00038932264,0.00016868826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009335941,0.00006268551,0.00022253348,0.000043084245,0.000055325196,0.000078274235,0.000114051334,0.000004788684,0.0000033252813,0.97035366,0.028736906,0.0003160515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019135207,0.00003437999,0.00019717512,0.00066500827,0.00016195083,0.000099172095,0.0011567384,0.000020702244,0.0000066305565,0.02745549,0.96962476,0.0003866596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8131527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86052823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97609955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004256084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026854095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125595189","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3292","title":"Administrative Constitutionalism and the Unity of Public Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Administrative law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Constitutionalism; Public law; Judicial review; Supreme court; Constitutional law; Human rights; Common law; Tribunal; Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.09471585267997136,"score_gpt":0.34251426663522305,"score_spread":0.2477984139552517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125595189","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037894442,0.0006462135,0.00025381488,0.011601568,0.00030398092,0.000079557256,0.0000127554795,0.000009927273,0.9833027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998213,0.00022486204,0.00012911057,0.0006824021,0.00066173106,0.0000026712135,6.124058e-7,0.0000016412396,0.00008399101],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988507,0.00033231484,0.00019141517,0.00008124895,0.00035871047,0.00018563311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989737,0.00024381976,0.00013668695,0.000053712884,0.00047837917,0.00011370362],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013555009,0.0000679647,0.00014459094,0.000014768574,0.0038598927,0.00011255993,0.00017325133,0.000046221718,0.00018678285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026368772,0.000043244167,0.00005782447,0.00010996428,0.017166266,0.00022502319,0.0000500753,0.00016584256,0.000010979192],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002842518,0.000024832343,0.00036581015,8.272453e-7,0.000053160657,0.0000031587554,0.0014491843,1.2409099e-7,0.000006581826,0.99759763,0.0001725319,0.0002977093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005561718,0.00004456197,0.0005590439,0.00002039087,0.000026021884,0.00004455355,0.0033026414,0.0000013219316,0.000047175054,0.8993774,0.09595505,0.00006567973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08781555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43396994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9944235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033741737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035658726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99743694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125616118","doi":"","title":"ACCESS TO JUSTICE LOOKING FOR A CONSTITUTIONAL HOME: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE LEGAL SYSTEM","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Constitution; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.14398722032429034,"score_gpt":0.4063718441865333,"score_spread":0.262384623862243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125616118","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000036187204,0.026435653,0.018974874,0.89941186,0.00067141623,0.004758689,0.0011943233,0.000035587265,0.048481412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815858,0.00406183,0.00007558756,0.01096183,0.00072420074,0.0020206403,0.000004759442,0.0000045867037,0.0005607759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992429,0.0000632628,0.00016202021,0.00013982029,0.00011549334,0.00027648077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843556,0.00087040523,0.00006112978,0.00013562072,0.00031402227,0.00018323914],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078289857,0.00007645762,0.00014386479,0.000019262134,0.0038690357,0.000099184836,0.00049008045,0.00002531465,0.000035586774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00087940815,0.000037252474,0.00008979562,0.00018934898,0.0009058583,0.00010882399,0.00002422388,0.000032277712,0.00004115322],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027264,0.0000015689947,0.000048815356,0.00007570891,0.000026690965,2.0360808e-7,0.00008150048,4.679938e-7,7.699502e-7,0.97241044,0.020119201,0.0072319126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065412525,0.000010050345,0.00095234765,0.00078653736,0.00019125117,0.0000035200371,0.00033101038,4.6693856e-7,7.8737884e-7,0.0047099786,0.99287015,0.00007850574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033693444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5155004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9815496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004428749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030707393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125655638","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1150","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada, Charter Dialogue, and Deference","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Legitimacy; Charter; Deference; Legislature; Political science; Judicial review; Law; Compromise; Law and economics; Democracy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.02033790141869781,"score_gpt":0.2464905909848397,"score_spread":0.22615268956614187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125655638","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01589598,0.0021170978,0.00004408909,0.021130549,0.00036534693,0.00006349273,0.000008826448,0.0000068211307,0.9603678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983295,0.00080518,0.00002706506,0.00042034042,0.00025422897,6.4412706e-7,2.2057284e-7,0.0000011481583,0.00016164711],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918646,0.00006241093,0.00013850271,0.00006008048,0.0003389051,0.00021364629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956894,0.0000922607,0.00007306292,0.000041053172,0.00012731159,0.00009735638],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038862554,0.00005237759,0.0000933534,0.0000068759155,0.0022328123,0.00005812532,0.0001430554,0.000024826186,0.000025439147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007244572,0.00003451249,0.000026815622,0.000046373658,0.00043302108,0.000077834906,0.000014460471,0.00011541739,0.0000012132676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008357633,0.000008384687,0.0010754573,3.493746e-7,0.000012997006,0.0000052405544,0.00047846767,9.782191e-7,0.000033491255,0.9936348,0.00212538,0.002616094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002670131,0.00007758647,0.053712722,0.000043641354,0.000027282345,0.000031534742,0.0026586568,0.000005395546,0.00006304835,0.82587624,0.11708285,0.00015405429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83416873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98243356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004613396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000358768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125688624","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200001140","title":"Law's Knowledge and Law's Effectiveness: Reflections from Legal Sociology and Legal Theory","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Curiosity; Nagging; Institutionalisation; Bureaucracy; Rationalization (economics); Law; Sociology; Parallels; Political science; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025207395803524567,"score_gpt":0.35074309936203935,"score_spread":0.3255357035585148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125688624","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38490194,0.008043779,0.00022244947,0.002718222,0.0007026831,0.00011089021,0.0000134254315,0.000052583284,0.60323405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99714935,0.0004010751,0.000057731337,0.0009841591,0.0012979512,0.0000032303187,0.0000014906759,0.0000036787783,0.00010132746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987446,0.00054059457,0.00014847293,0.00016591357,0.00013476721,0.00026565578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935377,0.00031008018,0.0000604674,0.000046681125,0.00009254782,0.00013647269],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007478977,0.000108332104,0.00019734656,0.000025078294,0.00416773,0.00014986818,0.0000922526,0.00010287921,0.000051135343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035091554,0.00009268476,0.00005953068,0.00005884055,0.0022255024,0.00037415113,0.00003830118,0.0003166136,0.000016380865],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044216264,0.000037782836,0.00016148546,0.0000011210062,0.0000499612,0.000026837155,0.0025093907,4.1208267e-7,0.0002945,0.9944996,0.00012235327,0.0022523096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030896076,0.00008407829,0.013040931,0.000027246633,0.000041724208,0.000070346425,0.00091855024,5.5815883e-7,0.00003898566,0.7074616,0.2778901,0.0001169567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012448948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03194363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6122474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007396327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008708969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125719470","doi":"","title":"A Theory of Quasi-Constitutional Legislation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Legislation; Constitution; Political science; Law; Constitutional law; Constitutional economics; Lawmaking; Constitutional review; Constitutional theory; Supreme court; Legislature","score_opus":0.01701624254465074,"score_gpt":0.2729659923426385,"score_spread":0.2559497497979878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125719470","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14827532,0.01022675,0.47953126,0.01895709,0.0013150707,0.00029608616,0.000018126011,0.0000884087,0.3412919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99461323,0.0035388526,0.000026174434,0.000038769005,0.00048668796,0.000002313216,2.8256648e-7,0.000001944298,0.0012917215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984519,0.00015307979,0.0001746915,0.0000821621,0.0003401446,0.00079802755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947804,0.00015941038,0.00011616531,0.000041238298,0.00016224492,0.00004287557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023192563,0.00005824616,0.000100419,0.000057987916,0.00061220035,0.000010683061,0.00013973204,0.00004331662,0.00011451183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036913215,0.00003794411,0.00008290896,0.00012540558,0.0014490109,0.00022265896,0.00001527249,0.0002191054,0.00003534756],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031021445,0.00003146546,0.0032878527,2.501779e-7,0.00005810968,4.371077e-7,0.00030715033,6.3154357e-7,0.00016489741,0.9498774,0.000034723314,0.046206087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000244191,0.00005960712,0.00092541386,0.000022051914,0.000014939873,0.000016435708,0.002473446,1.6346078e-7,0.000025932737,0.9776433,0.018513262,0.0000612609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031661187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026897595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8463379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005051078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045591136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8087672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125774979","doi":"","title":"Exchanging Constitutions: Constitutional Bricolage in Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Law and economics; Charter; Bricolage; Constitutional law; Globalization; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.04739537618638404,"score_gpt":0.3031354908338467,"score_spread":0.25574011464746266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125774979","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04899304,0.00243596,0.0004981872,0.009396214,0.0006563372,0.00019704102,0.000009753354,0.000050042345,0.93776345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99739784,0.00030043084,0.000068979956,0.00058384816,0.00015810844,0.000017693063,0.0000012716469,0.0000015032017,0.0014703361],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904144,0.000054770346,0.0001221964,0.00013989254,0.0003292121,0.00031250864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996602,0.00011069373,0.000032241147,0.000056979352,0.00005651602,0.00008337188],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016208188,0.00007411132,0.000113343754,0.000055511384,0.0007364458,0.000022235457,0.00010810064,0.00003077416,0.0014249936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022254136,0.00007905397,0.00002515298,0.00038237343,0.0012028103,0.0001000255,0.000030016323,0.000095939824,0.00010017481],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015061096,0.000020747737,0.013985984,0.0000014591421,0.0000072388602,0.000048623046,0.0022212532,0.00007653335,0.000009543328,0.97659886,0.0062759593,0.00075227313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042733454,0.00000682243,0.006364153,0.000070997616,0.000011122363,0.000009202025,0.02654651,0.00015206083,0.000019415558,0.004759212,0.9613166,0.00031659045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97476864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98878115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97183967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008458562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016127244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125784337","doi":"","title":"Judicial Activism in the House of Lords: A Composite Constitutionalist Approach","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Jurisprudence; Law; Judicial activism; Judicial review; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Constitutional law; Political science; Law and economics; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.01474734586211135,"score_gpt":0.2647009438853208,"score_spread":0.24995359802320943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125784337","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62747496,0.006750715,0.007913523,0.006683874,0.00035605006,0.00042215956,0.000010879988,0.000054729568,0.35033312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99826074,0.00082583784,0.000039708106,0.00010943888,0.0006820646,0.000007154531,0.0000018212484,0.0000042063984,0.00006903767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979487,0.0002267881,0.00024627362,0.00010950922,0.0005217349,0.0009469907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995903,0.00010419218,0.00013450706,0.00005678472,0.000091302936,0.000022964978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019995903,0.00008851841,0.0001619971,0.00007809115,0.0008515928,0.000040189447,0.00029881267,0.000053301934,0.0000063114094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005927147,0.00006452958,0.00009431295,0.0003626063,0.0010644896,0.00014418818,0.000019949422,0.0007137381,0.000005948648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030440546,0.0001662728,0.007160746,9.647672e-7,0.000031643474,0.0000027051742,0.0010536663,0.00008204641,0.000050212628,0.9906921,0.00010115046,0.00062807027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005588995,0.000057715475,0.014814945,0.000018904055,0.000035662906,0.000085800355,0.010609531,0.0000075673047,0.000012654876,0.9612883,0.012371662,0.00013838828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026225444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036648676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37078577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046512848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024572923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125838466","doi":"","title":"The Responsibility of Judges in Interpreting Tax Legislation: Japan’s Experience","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Statutory interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Statutory law; Jurisprudence; Law; Normative; Political science; Supreme court; Meaning (existential); Law and economics; Economics; Linguistics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.054345914101540445,"score_gpt":0.3392434112677006,"score_spread":0.28489749716616014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125838466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16593188,0.0013008916,0.00009916563,0.0052750106,0.0005007239,0.00008434586,0.0000017449878,0.000010790847,0.82679546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993094,0.00010828572,0.00015615374,0.000090563255,0.0002048856,0.0000047466565,1.2582251e-7,0.0000020321709,0.00012380439],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861926,0.0003437094,0.00029180266,0.000096817144,0.00044146477,0.00020692698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991332,0.00029783798,0.00014767118,0.00008383903,0.00024781213,0.00008962861],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024434926,0.000058512705,0.00011453863,0.000022095439,0.0010830854,0.00007998984,0.00025675827,0.00003952264,0.000026548625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014840176,0.000040871008,0.000049265553,0.00015864956,0.0010763771,0.00025455843,0.00006494777,0.00018189134,0.0000060523867],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007642415,0.000024408931,0.045905888,5.1167353e-7,0.0000073112114,0.0000040944283,0.021771433,0.000024155395,0.000029638974,0.929625,0.00022466682,0.0023065202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048936816,0.00009562313,0.01576814,0.00012525734,0.000009815374,0.000026933967,0.112707004,0.000040554198,0.00014340496,0.8020759,0.06833235,0.0001855977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.072894625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47649837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83337754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015217732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026673975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93327904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125840202","doi":"10.1163/2211906x-00201001","title":"Mapping Judicial Independence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Sine qua non; Judicial independence; Taxonomy (biology); Constitutionalism; Judicial opinion; Law; Political science; Judicial discretion; Democracy; Epistemology; Law and economics; Judicial review; Sociology; Mathematics; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.05183660684527865,"score_gpt":0.34140819154974467,"score_spread":0.28957158470446603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125840202","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38781413,0.0009845449,0.00118217,0.0025033613,0.0007365326,0.00012704494,0.0000042601077,0.000013857194,0.6066341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983456,0.00004983616,0.0004050445,0.00052230724,0.0006382282,0.000001980242,1.6681456e-7,9.0262756e-7,0.000035924157],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998697,0.00013522894,0.00028108023,0.000071958624,0.0006036919,0.00021107249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885416,0.00006320903,0.00021598076,0.00003593134,0.00070659973,0.0001241028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029837093,0.00007758755,0.00023767522,0.000021971602,0.00055930443,0.000081007696,0.00025153172,0.000046573878,0.00024288225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032359894,0.00006360636,0.000089411486,0.0002556263,0.00083316927,0.0004530087,0.0000402781,0.00014325933,0.00019163857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000123606205,0.000033450706,0.004994632,5.974879e-7,0.000055420267,0.000009181868,0.0019675817,0.000015977841,0.00004404571,0.9867747,0.0052745896,0.0008174672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037247853,0.0000891201,0.055883747,0.00007413296,0.000016656057,0.000028954442,0.013838461,0.0000045774123,0.000052844287,0.7800303,0.14943947,0.00016925353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007037636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026149685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61053145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014412207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026055094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125871169","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3040","title":"From Principles to Rules: The Case for Statutory Rules Governing Aspects of Judicial Disqualification","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Law; Proposition; Context (archaeology); Judicial review; CLARITY; Judicial discretion; Apprehension; Judicial opinion; Statutory interpretation; Political science; Common law; Sociology; Psychology; History; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0569221846130246,"score_gpt":0.3164076756664126,"score_spread":0.259485491053388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125871169","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2762838,0.0017037132,0.019799734,0.020870272,0.0016043128,0.0007174986,0.0014213227,0.0000665538,0.6775328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99711394,0.00016793978,0.00075281487,0.00015962138,0.0016840792,0.00001794481,0.0000032596429,0.000006875794,0.000093533556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877274,0.00015470717,0.0003021354,0.00014573232,0.00037022567,0.00025444475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986826,0.0006217888,0.00024619224,0.00009799975,0.00023028854,0.00012109117],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083191146,0.00009236353,0.00016159177,0.000022856379,0.0020073252,0.00007109423,0.00023999241,0.000049747978,0.00008504071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000562465,0.00005391412,0.000104053084,0.00006009522,0.0005417134,0.00018892097,0.000051029485,0.00008506787,0.000053640957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004868812,0.000031716576,0.00019056363,0.0000018864314,0.000052642026,0.000022620537,0.0032902888,0.000005778846,0.00039868237,0.9845298,0.00034094506,0.011086402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048807575,0.00007791789,0.0023112728,0.0001674627,0.00007670737,0.00003399984,0.010296903,0.0000040355394,0.0003134515,0.739407,0.24663472,0.00018844608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1066576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28009078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72083014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001571452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024111585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125892871","doi":"","title":"Thinking in Three Dimensions: Theorizing Rights as a Normative Concept","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Value pluralism; Variety (cybernetics); Pluralism (philosophy); Value (mathematics); Fundamental rights; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Human rights; Constraint (computer-aided design); Moral rights; Political science; Sociology; Law; Politics; Mathematics; Philosophy; Intellectual property","score_opus":0.016437603626950632,"score_gpt":0.27659309654648423,"score_spread":0.2601554929195336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125892871","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65104884,0.027508002,0.0086319335,0.07161352,0.0008512606,0.0006348336,0.000004258775,0.00018061094,0.23952672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99704033,0.001406134,0.000036600704,0.000921694,0.0005451501,0.0000034558436,4.3064358e-7,0.0000036775853,0.000042512755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978796,0.00016253878,0.00020368499,0.0001296262,0.00044639967,0.0011781297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957275,0.00012427541,0.00009941919,0.000033076725,0.00007919248,0.00009127686],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011938836,0.00009485231,0.0001585548,0.00004195325,0.001724703,0.000064200896,0.00026688486,0.00005071057,0.00005495913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026596128,0.000075604636,0.000071524126,0.00031954006,0.000297719,0.0002911701,0.00005518462,0.0010829786,0.000077255354],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021808512,0.000012906856,0.0012268703,3.1971283e-7,0.000045036235,0.000009211481,0.017746484,0.000017802256,0.000012242496,0.9795876,0.000023749295,0.0012959334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027047814,0.00008637634,0.00023953542,0.000028590792,0.000011182876,0.000011653978,0.02324778,0.000011682559,0.000011561166,0.97144973,0.004529213,0.00010220308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053006555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042548843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34599146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000564945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019638743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125919187","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1284","title":"Deliberate Disregard: Judicial Appointments under the Harper Government","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Racialization; Government (linguistics); Principal (computer security); Identity (music); Political science; Law; Constitutional law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03106755276336939,"score_gpt":0.297525379356055,"score_spread":0.26645782659268563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125919187","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012165407,0.06543259,0.00077895063,0.090166256,0.0011810405,0.0011325021,0.000025914871,0.00010310456,0.8399631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9098192,0.05008774,0.000059521863,0.037555825,0.0010446167,0.00012855687,0.000005829138,0.0000131388215,0.0012856032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801034,0.00031300716,0.00025857086,0.00021770825,0.0008773538,0.00032301748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993954,0.00012341856,0.000090323585,0.00019769637,0.00010110461,0.00009211338],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011724909,0.00014063623,0.0002722945,0.000003955424,0.0013755767,0.00006133185,0.00031849847,0.00004021037,0.00051499874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013106506,0.000089169,0.00014263044,0.00014065413,0.0007135521,0.000119498356,0.00010576962,0.00011373617,0.00046785097],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032215291,0.000028487622,0.00010661461,0.000032597884,0.00004464344,6.176289e-7,0.0001057928,0.0000014120566,0.0000032887403,0.97270936,0.021421129,0.0055428403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010203132,0.000016137843,0.0004040558,0.00044715407,0.000096752425,6.2434395e-7,0.0001339043,0.0000023955558,0.000004847695,0.031447306,0.96721613,0.00012864932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031535418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057497947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.945795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015088696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000089447305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126007625","doi":"","title":"Judging in Secular Times: Max Weber and the Rise of Proportionality","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Jurisprudence; Churning; Bureaucracy; Law; Sociology; Metaphysics; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03660460054409996,"score_gpt":0.3008139629620157,"score_spread":0.2642093624179157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126007625","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.068506055,0.23228243,0.0012083383,0.13021168,0.00086127914,0.008299805,0.0008885775,0.00016677938,0.55757505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98531246,0.01264333,0.000050752868,0.001475064,0.00011685883,0.00021096862,0.000012487414,0.000003890949,0.00017417113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99723685,0.0006856496,0.00062285626,0.00030951915,0.0007952344,0.0003499081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976892,0.0006883349,0.00025314864,0.00024848315,0.0010202986,0.000100539066],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022454392,0.00021672652,0.00050073286,0.00003264137,0.0011272113,0.00007048594,0.000417983,0.00007441742,0.0009185641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010421218,0.00012691588,0.00015302094,0.00030619281,0.01943694,0.0004582553,0.00019885408,0.00027580175,0.00006637578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003062625,0.000044930057,0.0013274332,0.00008272988,0.00004553321,0.00000907648,0.000503494,0.000010464864,0.000007058215,0.99585,0.001667615,0.00042102695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018510164,0.00008258349,0.007388242,0.0035446137,0.0004138193,0.00021735822,0.006320056,0.00020309907,0.000035247544,0.56341213,0.41570103,0.00083077775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05027782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075403666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9168064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007140847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090842927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126129298","doi":"","title":"The Attorney General’s Forgotten Role as Legal Advisor to the Legislature: A Comment on Schmidt v Canada (Attorney General)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Appeal; Political science; Parliament; House of Commons; Charter; Argument (complex analysis); Politics","score_opus":0.010139591605986239,"score_gpt":0.24930359281856615,"score_spread":0.2391640012125799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126129298","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18684724,0.002376574,0.000007496915,0.29724574,0.00332585,0.0011938377,0.00006529083,0.000087130255,0.5088509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9040703,0.00016329983,0.00005352654,0.06653338,0.0023728414,0.00013901261,0.000009911156,0.000018032919,0.0266397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972057,0.00025892764,0.00028699098,0.0004144788,0.001088161,0.0007457604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986827,0.00023002022,0.00010406254,0.0004741353,0.00016802244,0.00034110434],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006472614,0.0002528181,0.0002540632,0.000021990358,0.003379254,0.00034419043,0.0009076388,0.000103083934,0.00030784454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021094971,0.00015537902,0.00013459784,0.00031082617,0.00033827304,0.00018714617,0.00021954816,0.00042638605,0.0011055466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042715703,0.000022536475,0.0016653554,0.000001272466,0.000062257066,0.0000053251247,0.00036844992,0.0001416968,0.000060326776,0.74517995,0.2517686,0.00068155344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024845012,0.00007692047,0.003379786,0.000024672046,0.000019397909,0.000001209866,0.0014050598,0.000011009462,0.00012150641,0.003649594,0.9908146,0.00024778413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93532175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9563866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74153036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005751687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013518474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126134713","doi":"","title":"Independent or Dependent? Constitutional Courts in Divided Societies","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnic group; Independence (probability theory); Judicial independence; Politics; Political science; Law; Constitutional court; Constitutional law; Minority rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Constitution","score_opus":0.026380457616388502,"score_gpt":0.3015190333346295,"score_spread":0.27513857571824096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126134713","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75427914,0.037035543,0.008026339,0.014491952,0.004188471,0.0007016304,0.000019848718,0.00015630289,0.18110077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891476,0.007364087,0.000025282361,0.00025682332,0.0011417874,0.000011482763,0.0000014929021,0.000004615258,0.0020468424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99621683,0.00018053323,0.00027053893,0.00012880255,0.0007657689,0.0024375014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994625,0.00012278528,0.00011066004,0.000052123698,0.00010677307,0.00014517202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003394625,0.00012818152,0.00018124409,0.000093288756,0.0012656277,0.000065387896,0.00024194056,0.0001083771,0.00023408617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029048332,0.000103565886,0.000093646064,0.00019519246,0.0010375674,0.0005301226,0.000059373637,0.0011023208,0.00007921775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000423851,0.00010356672,0.072018154,9.689995e-7,0.00007278886,0.00000485937,0.0014843515,0.000009233346,0.0000115067605,0.9240803,0.0003246413,0.0018472048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009983006,0.00007565816,0.019140603,0.00003855475,0.00004342725,0.00022837071,0.039012443,0.0000014800704,0.000015450158,0.9042396,0.035876825,0.00032931915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013641162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022858368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23486844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019110576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067004412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99893063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126721633","doi":"","title":"A Genealogy of Political Constitutionalism in the U.K., and Why Canadians Might be Interested (and What the British Might Learn from Canada)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"UCL Discovery (University College London)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Constitution; Politics; Sovereignty; Democracy; Political science; Law; Hegemony; Sociology","score_opus":0.016244953304850183,"score_gpt":0.19848798843448204,"score_spread":0.18224303512963186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126721633","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.075200245,0.011247209,0.000043582026,0.21152294,0.00077740307,0.0011051793,0.010300384,0.000023673745,0.6897794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9716745,0.0023219318,0.0000066631546,0.0060724514,0.00018010379,0.0000011786874,0.00007034344,0.0000071352683,0.019665714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986522,0.00015034605,0.00015730763,0.00031538066,0.00044985383,0.0002748668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999072,0.0005035811,0.00009239849,0.00011186941,0.00007021198,0.00014991114],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011469115,0.00016901837,0.0003436801,0.000055683697,0.0014649098,0.00019126137,0.00037145737,0.00016784602,0.00008647079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060874507,0.00015564109,0.0000788219,0.00011520733,0.0033100136,0.0004209231,0.00018272745,0.00031931014,0.0000014212748],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035677553,0.000008055273,0.00044312497,0.000006254817,0.00010729658,0.0006062568,0.0013394412,4.2248075e-7,5.712673e-7,0.9869928,0.010340335,0.00011976433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055030757,0.000031043688,0.00933082,0.0002636968,0.00019309956,0.00002976007,0.0468738,0.000006327192,3.733154e-7,0.053404763,0.88899827,0.00031773583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.985454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.933588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034321102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025771565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128993987","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3777108","title":"The Washington January 6, 2021 Insurrection, and Racist and Ethnic Terrorism in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnic group; Terrorism; Political science; Criminology; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.010320745011895248,"score_gpt":0.25619733398760286,"score_spread":0.2458765889757076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128993987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8852497,0.08341859,0.00004857327,0.022406295,0.0006649551,0.0000651916,0.0000015885886,0.0000036791334,0.008141466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9141421,0.08487072,0.000002209712,0.000103295926,0.00023932429,0.0000024054325,4.122556e-7,0.0000020090997,0.00063755346],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858993,0.00016627282,0.00013740952,0.000107534914,0.00022643791,0.0007724131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964654,0.00014045865,0.0000480722,0.00003534291,0.0000748278,0.000054752883],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011718149,0.000059948947,0.000089175934,0.00001863029,0.0014055878,0.000063266496,0.00007341914,0.000029269186,0.000007971846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023541381,0.000046046935,0.000017777158,0.00020957322,0.00018970719,0.000106436186,0.000036974852,0.00074522535,8.130961e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003880294,0.000031033007,0.1404621,0.0000027668764,0.00015093178,0.000052560878,0.004282309,0.000009153196,0.000048942242,0.41625184,0.0012174641,0.4374521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051458273,0.000045272154,0.13415527,0.00004455183,0.000026777627,0.0002500441,0.20190908,0.000013010809,0.000021202968,0.5717536,0.09103197,0.00023462916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8593692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99924654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43721747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001221923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01162885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130116209","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Dialogue: Right, Democracy, Institutions (Introduction)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Metaphor; Political science; Legislature; Politics; Relevance (law); Rhetoric; Constitutional economics; Constitutional theory; Perspective (graphical); Law; Law and economics; Constitutional law; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.013500372690046255,"score_gpt":0.27048570109425835,"score_spread":0.25698532840421207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130116209","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14027879,0.0089332275,0.022012742,0.09549688,0.010693895,0.00085989863,0.000029860621,0.00031959012,0.7213751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868295,0.004783364,0.000065913526,0.00023800063,0.0041120406,0.0000069290754,0.00001000767,0.0000041560925,0.003950069],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969855,0.0001451395,0.0002769982,0.00024425142,0.00056962366,0.001778473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992893,0.000071399954,0.00012432846,0.00011363242,0.00027141644,0.00012994971],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015673569,0.00014338334,0.00019423968,0.000081414866,0.003104335,0.000090491616,0.00030318525,0.00009374296,0.00074841495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002452446,0.00012813383,0.00015487935,0.00042489407,0.0017568894,0.0005211435,0.000044812103,0.0011385579,0.0012620542],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018995162,0.000055581742,0.0052429964,8.13967e-7,0.000113498565,0.0000028268792,0.00014971363,0.000081940874,0.000030720832,0.9914728,0.0009852744,0.0018448661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000281816,0.000043346292,0.0005973999,0.000006964332,0.00002616306,0.00013157158,0.0016035854,0.0000016501381,0.000005427183,0.5551129,0.44204962,0.00013953957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010178034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00823836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8465507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001530286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010109916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130718974","doi":"","title":"Peter Aucoin, Mark D.Jarvis &Lori Turnbull,Democratizing the Constitution: Reforming ResponsibleGovernment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04424122050940862,"score_gpt":0.2707355482931368,"score_spread":0.22649432778372816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130718974","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021959739,0.00093851547,0.00039219443,0.0039004218,0.0018607733,0.00018453844,0.000009647324,0.0000631957,0.97069097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99484205,0.0005888339,0.00054037163,0.0016843767,0.0016565322,0.000010632081,6.7871895e-7,0.0000073872948,0.00066912035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978038,0.00027484162,0.00037303224,0.00018593259,0.00085841207,0.0005039489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910414,0.00014491004,0.00021182038,0.00016073647,0.00019625975,0.00018215261],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017576328,0.00016090601,0.00019153478,0.00003913928,0.00667883,0.00018009076,0.0004161197,0.00008275629,0.0006769918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020979832,0.00010511355,0.00015135479,0.00023214823,0.0016419815,0.00046740338,0.00013160007,0.00043064854,0.00012960471],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010361081,0.00004321239,0.0015141101,0.0000020104587,0.00008480774,0.00014385513,0.010535202,0.0000020101052,0.000055069177,0.98181933,0.0027917754,0.0029050312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033358863,0.00006685572,0.004072881,0.00008484724,0.000070785565,0.0002733131,0.011974777,0.0000025035208,0.00017000959,0.05145805,0.93124163,0.00025075654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005833961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013630338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97288233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002845105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003965052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99461436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3131461733","doi":"","title":"Law as a Social Construction and Conceptual Legal Theory","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal positivism; Empirical legal studies; Legal realism; Epistemology; Philosophy of law; Premise; Dilemma; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Sociology; Legal formalism; Political philosophy; Politics; Law and economics; Political science; Legal research; Black letter law; Philosophy; Comparative law; Private law","score_opus":0.008049936317195508,"score_gpt":0.25945944381491337,"score_spread":0.25140950749771784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3131461733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6485066,0.002475424,0.00029534116,0.0030868417,0.00054264965,0.00012208674,0.0000018620399,0.000034490055,0.34493473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961022,0.0012042257,0.000012914867,0.00032698765,0.0007870454,0.0000017656195,4.9339707e-7,0.000003908336,0.0015604715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984112,0.00016327552,0.00011710202,0.00011453956,0.0002713128,0.00092257274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971545,0.00006113371,0.00007091134,0.00002481918,0.00007732305,0.000050342387],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011855756,0.000074546275,0.00012083235,0.000025472975,0.0014514481,0.00007088252,0.00009410821,0.00006539052,0.0001497794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047787024,0.000066766894,0.00005761146,0.00008578371,0.0014211388,0.0002507244,0.000024979063,0.00062492455,0.000085479034],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041847496,0.000008802316,0.0010864408,3.8185772e-7,0.00006501702,0.0000010820814,0.0017432376,2.402512e-7,0.00003973606,0.98849946,0.000022032911,0.0084917415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003095457,0.00008180141,0.00020028761,0.0000044079684,0.000018626883,0.000090705034,0.062536344,1.9699411e-7,0.0000066115695,0.87146133,0.065202594,0.00008756482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027910478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064832843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3475956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034301783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019629884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3132295648","doi":"","title":"Cabinet Immunity in Canada: The Legal Black Hole","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Principle of legality; Constitution; Judicial review; Constitutionality; Statutory law; Separation of powers; Jurisprudence; Statutory interpretation; Common law","score_opus":0.015262079559029947,"score_gpt":0.2667185706266405,"score_spread":0.25145649106761053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3132295648","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8617092,0.0019500747,0.000028662078,0.030677048,0.00043500014,0.00009059911,0.0000024917383,0.000005621965,0.105101325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951028,0.0031442433,0.0000010476244,0.00016469393,0.0004233659,0.000002012192,2.519945e-7,0.0000025422255,0.001159015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815995,0.000119814555,0.00012687725,0.00007035634,0.0003164363,0.0012065928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996109,0.000045847653,0.00011069426,0.00012520641,0.00006272006,0.000044601915],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016292267,0.00006423403,0.00009910115,0.000016216207,0.0035088344,0.00011958927,0.0006191163,0.000024550842,0.000024242878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027384472,0.000044701945,0.00003980334,0.000059094655,0.0005444093,0.00018686267,0.00006213388,0.0010820292,0.000011615852],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011604724,0.000012500588,0.027616741,2.6891155e-7,0.0000376291,0.000007811219,0.0005967834,0.000042728676,0.000004322934,0.9656289,0.00050162745,0.0055390885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056619174,0.000050516275,0.25644794,0.000023322073,0.000024830462,0.000020774582,0.05843518,0.000023825995,0.000007854649,0.54193723,0.14222749,0.00023486142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99575233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99984914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42369166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025190483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024920512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133595346","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1408","title":"The Missing Constitutionalism of Canada v Vavilov","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Appeal; Citizenship; Political science; Constitution; Administrative law; Law; Legislation; Argument (complex analysis); Constitutional law; Judicial review; Supreme court; Legalism (Western philosophy); Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.028926299598757338,"score_gpt":0.3183451814879905,"score_spread":0.28941888188923315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133595346","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06512675,0.004336968,0.00003989156,0.24267036,0.00088762725,0.00004872683,0.000025691512,0.000004141426,0.68685985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960663,0.00033915797,0.00002348728,0.0017704208,0.001587084,1.8505747e-7,1.8933372e-7,0.000001079805,0.00021212918],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992171,0.000088599714,0.00019731472,0.000033254917,0.0003334644,0.00013025764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992585,0.00014106027,0.00014988292,0.000018336363,0.00037790934,0.000054272656],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033066244,0.000037227615,0.00012607846,0.000010637566,0.002041936,0.000035829205,0.00006982716,0.000029705474,0.000008645238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025650885,0.000026909049,0.000056441397,0.00009240661,0.0012113425,0.00006104103,0.000021782082,0.00007973361,1.2827552e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055987794,0.000007819024,0.0000901319,0.0000018173831,0.000036014888,0.000010541495,0.0020002192,4.774563e-7,0.000046119898,0.994795,0.001777837,0.001228426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016183394,0.0000075031166,0.0019295498,0.000018973446,0.000020596957,0.000015867141,0.0053025447,1.9050478e-7,0.00007974932,0.2140242,0.77839035,0.000048641235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.58737564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5989234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9309395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010179903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061099683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134230150","doi":"10.7202/1075516ar","title":"“A Constitution Similar in Principle to That of the United Kingdom”: The Preamble, Constitutional Principles, and a Sustainable Jurisprudence","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Preamble; Constitutionalism; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Constitution; Political science; Judicial independence; Judicial review; Common law; Liberal democracy; Constitutional law; Democracy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.06545829340970336,"score_gpt":0.3183575097178903,"score_spread":0.2528992163081869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134230150","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3681509,0.0013736838,0.0008020162,0.024609622,0.0009803475,0.0009965153,0.000076455384,0.000036656882,0.6029738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99871933,0.00023746766,0.00013838499,0.0006372084,0.00009092931,0.000011294057,9.993004e-7,0.000002089024,0.0001623157],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983412,0.0003152368,0.000267379,0.00015807139,0.00055678363,0.00036135534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989805,0.00019832505,0.00013635457,0.00012077443,0.0004624875,0.00010152082],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012843829,0.00009982785,0.00015938203,0.000057402973,0.0066314866,0.00007867372,0.00026221693,0.000060668874,0.000040380248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008206445,0.0000632136,0.00006505523,0.00070160895,0.0029167116,0.00020426858,0.0002974532,0.0002775793,0.0000023374162],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018376457,0.000044237197,0.014370506,0.000006389515,0.000022243508,0.00004585035,0.0003213703,0.0007699879,0.00002938023,0.98425233,0.000060243707,0.000059101218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029724126,0.0000149798925,0.01330014,0.00014054083,0.000023513934,0.00009917417,0.0031461783,0.000011802991,0.00048898096,0.013675795,0.96870005,0.00010159252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00969872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033632766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9705765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022290564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043859315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134345006","doi":"10.5539/ilr.v10n1p195","title":"Modernising the Constitution - A Courts Act","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Law Research","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.2035229278818347,"score_gpt":0.4783933693468695,"score_spread":0.2748704414650348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134345006","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012228584,0.00040560254,0.0002451994,0.04267614,0.0006341507,0.00008926841,0.000009959502,0.00002534554,0.94368577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951969,0.00022057454,0.00005218296,0.00045844953,0.00070446124,0.000018081939,0.000006227274,0.0000019386778,0.0033411896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800044,0.0002745101,0.0001025978,0.00015274307,0.0012300315,0.00023968123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838775,0.00045386225,0.00001897686,0.00008424967,0.0010043348,0.00005080415],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012553675,0.000042672018,0.00005479811,0.00003102332,0.0022399232,0.00023510712,0.00029162475,0.000038966464,0.00050595816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007419818,0.000032708802,0.000046370536,0.00016520606,0.001966953,0.00016891952,0.00014992409,0.00022222451,0.00019883146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008878018,0.000031393145,0.00059717346,5.2344296e-7,0.000031929307,0.000031912594,0.0006204857,0.00002179487,0.00015237396,0.995482,0.0012446609,0.001776875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007606669,0.000003863972,0.0006425946,0.000019167059,0.0000023416833,0.00000570009,0.0011783696,0.00005263581,0.00022900685,0.21357504,0.78417325,0.000041987263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015565483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014486303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98296833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020442465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073971326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134537905","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3698923","title":"Do Judicial Review Theories Ground Majority Rule in Constitutional Courts?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Judicial review; Exclusionary rule; Supreme court","score_opus":0.021723669263357243,"score_gpt":0.2989299345426077,"score_spread":0.27720626527925046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134537905","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.071015924,0.42234194,0.0059969113,0.1899499,0.0018999635,0.0009886065,0.000042545686,0.00017948973,0.3075847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8780631,0.11819187,0.000017958328,0.0022620657,0.0013788595,0.000008033629,0.000002422154,0.000003749425,0.000071938535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99723494,0.00024637053,0.0003355112,0.00020251099,0.00059703045,0.0013836346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994264,0.00009511719,0.00012829732,0.00005072902,0.00015881412,0.00014061193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024579482,0.00013430875,0.00028888087,0.00004107347,0.001157814,0.000069962196,0.0002954288,0.00006885913,0.00023515786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007299198,0.00012095952,0.00012438216,0.00037489974,0.0015186655,0.00029028422,0.00005146567,0.0011963971,0.00009249518],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003150022,0.000032334025,0.0046564043,0.0000095577825,0.000050135695,0.0000110175215,0.0005320347,0.0000027762414,0.0000036897766,0.99040014,0.00040114232,0.0038693005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003090727,0.000049794424,0.0011765602,0.00015544242,0.00003633064,0.000033295943,0.0036574937,6.571527e-7,8.9780553e-7,0.9381057,0.056319572,0.00015516995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016284282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047882646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8070472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008209047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00674146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134963254","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3762594","title":"Biased Impartiality: A Survey of Post-Rds Caselaw on Bias, Race and Indigeneity","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Race (biology); Political science; Law; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.04832420827637419,"score_gpt":0.32272894320260015,"score_spread":0.27440473492622597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134963254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9896061,0.0050568865,0.000086882224,0.0022254377,0.00017152393,0.000065462606,0.000030899373,0.000010731687,0.0027460908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99240357,0.0070169116,0.0000064931833,0.000181655,0.00016847841,0.000001381663,0.0000056189424,0.000004134894,0.00021178657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976456,0.0006132841,0.00022730441,0.00015041544,0.00039619347,0.00096716505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896497,0.0002872656,0.0001404688,0.000070689806,0.00044080804,0.0000958157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003880613,0.00009044004,0.00021772037,0.000047197886,0.000873836,0.000047077694,0.000106552645,0.000064999884,0.000036782872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013771296,0.00008003511,0.00006899822,0.00034876523,0.00034836345,0.00009673129,0.000036372432,0.00054836157,0.000006307916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002092297,0.00023351112,0.18851396,0.0000043814694,0.00035761224,0.000031089356,0.0027103212,0.000009085888,0.0003945303,0.78898454,0.00011990668,0.01843186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015851657,0.0008632396,0.69935757,0.00008822442,0.00014134712,0.00023447539,0.023695644,0.0000064621613,0.0014517307,0.26260275,0.009438668,0.0005347494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049179927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4199688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5263818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034423976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007359908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135137383","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqaa055","title":"Is Majority Rule Justified in Constitutional Adjudication?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Majority rule; Voting; Statute; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.08701728811984924,"score_gpt":0.3589860886832909,"score_spread":0.27196880056344164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135137383","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30870262,0.041513864,0.0012479085,0.34856886,0.0026374662,0.00046160724,0.00007225789,0.000070747374,0.29672468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99095565,0.0056686383,0.00033363464,0.0019808789,0.0009594873,0.000004247573,5.8034897e-7,0.000002406327,0.00009446837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851465,0.00008844481,0.00046475726,0.0001305257,0.0005751371,0.00022646016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989144,0.0001592483,0.000245129,0.00003825144,0.00051384396,0.00012913307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053770957,0.00010681379,0.00034361827,0.00006780475,0.00065167574,0.000036405712,0.00021507246,0.00004812575,0.000095566276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010751963,0.000090744754,0.000123935,0.00040549252,0.0018234245,0.00036024902,0.00007486487,0.0002467075,0.0000181051],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012814239,0.000092691385,0.051297277,0.00001698831,0.00027546484,0.000081609454,0.010840507,0.000035514473,0.000053468633,0.9194697,0.014738039,0.0029706105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082103704,0.00010409693,0.019487638,0.00009905461,0.00007728156,0.000011134432,0.016215635,0.0000045287484,0.00005659851,0.0318425,0.9310864,0.0001940693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043307003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048295298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9163484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001614369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055720913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67184836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135434455","doi":"10.7202/1075517ar","title":"The Unwritten Principle of Democracy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Legitimacy; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Law; Separation of powers; Constitutionalism; Constitutional review; Law and economics; Supreme court; Liberal democracy; Secession; Federalism; Relevance (law); Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03076628031883912,"score_gpt":0.31313489364016056,"score_spread":0.28236861332132146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135434455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012215947,0.001258765,0.000026450094,0.013259004,0.00054382125,0.000036186742,0.000007937516,0.000010657856,0.9726412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99806625,0.00095894997,0.00011458004,0.00017682799,0.00028205127,8.281277e-7,1.9538516e-7,0.0000018131276,0.00039849838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920005,0.000110638044,0.00015615002,0.000053483393,0.00031366627,0.00016600756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993866,0.000135086,0.00007657249,0.000051008683,0.0002910654,0.000059639235],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004818438,0.000036754922,0.000077759185,0.0000063590082,0.010712201,0.000037048492,0.00013807291,0.000023165783,0.00009433991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025496882,0.000024370318,0.0000722186,0.0001223334,0.0004744065,0.00008135775,0.000052158317,0.00011376557,0.000015131419],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037424495,0.00001557319,0.0007695724,4.8019155e-7,0.00002670497,0.000016845252,0.00008779036,0.0000028899108,0.000028927287,0.9952476,0.00014947941,0.0036503656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007315416,0.0000069321304,0.0016815751,0.000011006594,0.000009438322,0.000018849796,0.001146555,5.6611293e-7,0.00031008816,0.08373584,0.9129722,0.00003381167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014134808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0334499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98585033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004281071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058945778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99057573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135453247","doi":"","title":"Indipendenza senza autonomia. I delicati rapporti fra potere esecutivo e giudiziario in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Executive branch; Political science; Politics; Government (linguistics); Law; Constitutional law; Executive power; Power (physics); Autonomy; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.033204021030256194,"score_gpt":0.283810711327999,"score_spread":0.2506066902977428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135453247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8966561,0.005125699,0.00004367588,0.04776359,0.0019322282,0.00041553265,0.0012034858,0.000055845227,0.046803847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98916304,0.0016086943,0.00021710839,0.0056741186,0.00080224464,0.000015301152,0.00017999821,0.000016487045,0.0023230235],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968621,0.0002285108,0.00073380675,0.00065055536,0.000735134,0.0007898976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986912,0.0001807684,0.00025322448,0.00029639425,0.0002988902,0.0002795019],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003317029,0.0003186816,0.00058474485,0.00007198846,0.00064651686,0.00007858867,0.00042907364,0.00020146863,0.0011230202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033552563,0.00033868945,0.00012992062,0.0009949977,0.00041036398,0.00016556082,0.00030987788,0.00055161864,0.000068361085],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021264923,0.0036401206,0.62175566,0.00015472455,0.0012709242,0.005909863,0.021801475,0.0013544112,0.0003963877,0.16353075,0.09103799,0.088935025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001336816,0.000043190827,0.2630239,0.00027905748,0.000118050746,0.000023460543,0.03817951,0.00057536,0.00017082022,0.0037603998,0.6914758,0.001013603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9798794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99854875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6004378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015707983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02078927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135674495","doi":"10.7202/1075515ar","title":"Rethinking the Invisible Constitution: How Unwritten Constitutional Principles Shape Political Decision-Making","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Constitution; Legislature; Politics; Law; Scholarship; Political science; Warrant; Constitutional law; Action (physics); Government (linguistics); Constitutional review; Judicial review; Constitutional economics; Law and economics; Sociology; Democracy; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0724215343438571,"score_gpt":0.3227976483686118,"score_spread":0.2503761140247547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135674495","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026192528,0.0012805894,0.00221874,0.04590409,0.0016376997,0.00012821847,0.000050484294,0.00006866868,0.94609225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99315536,0.00021701786,0.0020629594,0.0030156698,0.0014562751,0.000006271207,0.0000024904264,0.000004467764,0.00007946461],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99733084,0.0003204879,0.00035261665,0.00026192184,0.0010979761,0.0006361463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977679,0.0009692228,0.00013731736,0.00014529754,0.0007410521,0.00023916452],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001310691,0.00016207651,0.00023562842,0.00004705709,0.022384424,0.00045915303,0.00037423492,0.00013161104,0.00066497596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002097227,0.0001187185,0.00020051858,0.0003758216,0.0059830737,0.0004439466,0.00021831969,0.0006007995,0.00006162298],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013476527,0.00003772505,0.0010120377,0.0000019816366,0.000068785914,0.00027091033,0.00021345359,0.000046061064,0.000007364136,0.9952582,0.00043565323,0.00263433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018173062,0.000009975471,0.00050650473,0.00019269035,0.000036213347,0.0005736625,0.0025005443,0.000025330843,0.00002811801,0.32760605,0.66819495,0.00014419833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046050825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011470147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99053615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037681343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061303814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99672204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135866945","doi":"10.7202/1075518ar","title":"The Structural and Administrative Demands of Unwritten Constitutional Principles","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Administrative law; Political science; Constitution; Separation of powers; Judicial independence; Constitutionalism; Duty; Judicial review; Constitutional law; Politics; Sociology; Law and economics; Democracy","score_opus":0.06304416415205462,"score_gpt":0.32959686365015195,"score_spread":0.26655269949809735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135866945","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059948936,0.002858483,0.000051810384,0.007204767,0.0005200332,0.000070384354,0.00006569996,0.000011015789,0.9292689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988649,0.00058178883,0.00017281872,0.00008063063,0.00019247335,0.0000012837546,7.867696e-7,0.0000010030127,0.00010433991],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992092,0.00010289029,0.00018029616,0.000073191455,0.0002892966,0.00014512059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993088,0.00019393125,0.0000924793,0.000033211887,0.00029682936,0.000074721],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032595982,0.00005280916,0.000097789605,0.000007857355,0.00892022,0.00005557402,0.00008337291,0.000030013773,0.000053625416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022781918,0.000034550972,0.000047509406,0.000077286575,0.0034757312,0.00010334663,0.00004667409,0.00011773161,0.0000013472959],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010451459,0.000005922685,0.0023830463,9.353227e-7,0.000046532426,0.0000195044,0.00017498193,0.0000036631047,0.00001638146,0.99627745,0.000024986162,0.0010361199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000264871,0.000033404678,0.014637689,0.000034637833,0.000030033001,0.0002154602,0.0067994003,0.000004161221,0.0004104872,0.11579321,0.86168116,0.00009549058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046319937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025604384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93891597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034808578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015992654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3136342672","doi":"10.15804/ppk.2020.06.42","title":"Constitutional Protection of Fundamental Freedoms in the Decisions of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2020,"lang":"pl","type":"article","venue":"Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Human rights","score_opus":0.054864199150394664,"score_gpt":0.26582802108103054,"score_spread":0.21096382193063587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3136342672","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69417244,0.0056429585,0.0017525879,0.12579991,0.003515984,0.005563266,0.0024262078,0.00003269331,0.16109392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99911165,0.00016161552,0.000049049864,0.0004101337,0.00018701564,0.000037964586,0.000003938257,0.0000041890053,0.000034447592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964527,0.00053608895,0.0008665774,0.00028971361,0.0015047977,0.00035012898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980126,0.00073670025,0.0005862257,0.00022377924,0.0003436497,0.00009702102],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084738317,0.000210482,0.00046958541,0.000039461735,0.0007511434,0.000020024316,0.00080078345,0.000121283265,0.00018525867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017206549,0.00013967378,0.00020464965,0.0012078206,0.0066537424,0.0001410076,0.000233663,0.00037942332,0.0000037866075],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002647338,0.00049922045,0.094166815,0.00009656261,0.00026216658,0.000007731223,0.015554087,0.0005329122,0.001868428,0.8793113,0.0057526026,0.0016834334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006109742,0.0013398681,0.46582848,0.0029086557,0.0009211723,0.000059191338,0.1526092,0.0010703236,0.0061558364,0.0493285,0.31197444,0.0016946255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48071638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57133645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8299828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018407074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043319035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137172720","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190861551.003.0004","title":"Legal Pluralism in the West","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Legal pluralism; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Legal realism; Legal research","score_opus":0.0409469476398302,"score_gpt":0.28716307814509134,"score_spread":0.24621613050526114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137172720","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000022810813,0.0013088328,0.0000018439663,0.015683495,0.00030953056,0.00009638643,0.0000056124463,0.000016565384,0.9825549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.079500966,0.0011334553,0.000010284474,0.0023473508,0.00090871303,0.0000069163884,0.000007736779,0.0000037942023,0.9160808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923897,0.000027468459,0.00011129434,0.0001298794,0.00036148579,0.00013090357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997275,0.00009626716,0.000029721983,0.000071750736,0.000054357268,0.000020407559],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002226471,0.00008737781,0.00013170854,0.000023965722,0.00039896922,0.00006546199,0.00019497835,0.000111517475,0.0024834126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038774226,0.000057237798,0.000079002864,0.000034761357,0.0005107134,0.000046888406,0.0000452526,0.0001850897,0.00022913357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.43042e-7,0.000003648434,0.000022788248,4.994996e-7,0.000009882113,0.000043969496,0.000964196,1.0979475e-7,9.516883e-8,0.9913412,0.0065930686,0.0010199434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000254278,0.000002826106,0.00018336717,0.000025327017,0.000008107962,9.942171e-7,0.0015584133,2.8638768e-8,9.929864e-8,0.09300238,0.90511256,0.000080470985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03100447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17351328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8985195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052324856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027437814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99842846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137495918","doi":"","title":"Two Cheers for a Cabinet Manual (And a Note of Caution)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Prerogative; Law; Political science; Scholarship; Politics; Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.0167320391189875,"score_gpt":0.3386761242722614,"score_spread":0.3219440851532739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137495918","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8925797,0.007420233,0.010398589,0.025847174,0.0010153595,0.0005373658,0.00002769346,0.000032257678,0.062141668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962893,0.0024263,0.00007597598,0.000035642104,0.00046197316,0.0000050294507,4.0124587e-7,0.0000026526977,0.000702689],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887276,0.000024910052,0.00011505182,0.00007851575,0.00017339624,0.00073537405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959934,0.00003968914,0.00014900691,0.00005443402,0.00011100215,0.00004651852],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011346012,0.00005446713,0.00011351856,0.000025638381,0.0019918922,0.000048247326,0.00017318943,0.000030435758,0.0000063183215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028167723,0.0000473632,0.00006241142,0.000024599218,0.00054574234,0.0001488788,0.000028263326,0.00024474203,0.0000021478459],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031830867,0.000011668354,0.0028587042,0.0000013384536,0.000053379976,4.1177978e-7,0.00064678525,0.0000014533214,0.000071241564,0.9858651,0.000046236426,0.010411855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008039795,0.00012750679,0.006692342,0.000017796674,0.00004950778,0.000018882129,0.004714451,0.000010345166,0.000036518413,0.9718301,0.015598015,0.00010050575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075255693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049138922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.103709675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002280485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017078166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137688563","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3793865","title":"A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF RIGID AMANDEMMENT IN AUSTRALIA &amp;amp; CANADA","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.061511231227156286,"score_gpt":0.3539449151789087,"score_spread":0.2924336839517524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137688563","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99348384,0.0010372043,0.000042455147,0.0010720921,0.00018729984,0.00010636537,0.000002532404,0.0000028016586,0.0040654363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974592,0.00050497305,0.000009693869,0.000037382968,0.00012624348,0.0000045523525,0.000001330708,0.0000016670222,0.0018549676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981035,0.00021359071,0.00023798036,0.00011249105,0.00045788096,0.0008745318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995838,0.00005228594,0.00009699276,0.000052238607,0.00016012536,0.000054558106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007419874,0.00007401037,0.00021255272,0.0000338309,0.00038278967,0.0000186982,0.0001298875,0.000023576957,0.000095954405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006138218,0.00006740518,0.000036118447,0.00030445366,0.00010990013,0.00006202022,0.000027384265,0.00054447993,0.0000075832095],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009918791,0.00132885,0.32645094,0.0000037113546,0.000758311,0.000047006986,0.032457553,0.00033007082,0.00014727027,0.63405514,0.0034135457,0.0009084185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021870732,0.00024782735,0.086731754,0.000059436385,0.00009681941,0.000048669033,0.46756318,0.0000010697527,0.000049016973,0.35885274,0.08375992,0.00040249247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9062709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43510562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015663849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009845167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138550065","doi":"","title":"Precedent Unbound - Contemporary Approaches to Precedent in Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Convention; Political science; Majority opinion","score_opus":0.063769681251808,"score_gpt":0.2554909823418178,"score_spread":0.1917213010900098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3138550065","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44381914,0.0013346175,0.000022791432,0.004998329,0.00059080106,0.0005046848,0.000025573687,0.000043708576,0.54866034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99672616,0.00001748098,0.000086514236,0.00070905796,0.00046828185,0.00009598854,0.000008729654,0.0000070220685,0.0018807903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983344,0.00012215003,0.00028923212,0.00029576628,0.00055445306,0.0004039786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994929,0.00008122332,0.00005773171,0.00012648202,0.00004505693,0.00019662385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033714774,0.00013709838,0.00021358734,0.00003732814,0.0005833902,0.00009289547,0.00026590138,0.00005599416,0.00013818034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007926063,0.0001348118,0.000044261098,0.00032001815,0.00021736907,0.00018531916,0.00009017804,0.00014318172,0.0000932483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029662548,0.000085357606,0.18484432,0.0000066504203,0.000021623273,0.000024192634,0.0006858415,0.00033399285,0.000016988404,0.79540557,0.018153742,0.00039208308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004667082,0.000033437405,0.1894316,0.000081882186,0.000010434418,0.0000011547694,0.005964959,0.0000069151656,0.00018417924,0.031046351,0.7723146,0.00045777392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9983809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99977016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7643592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010642613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022889841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5497465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3142234067","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3716791","title":"Statistics as if Legality Mattered: The Two-Front Politics of Empirical Legal Studies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Politics; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.051079886166099035,"score_gpt":0.37768546330030284,"score_spread":0.3266055771342038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3142234067","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40575254,0.03619621,0.021011706,0.4697793,0.0016879935,0.00068320375,0.00015271286,0.0001264473,0.0646099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919613,0.0038971778,0.000083785235,0.002208797,0.0011558668,0.0000027796011,9.903015e-7,0.000006103579,0.00068321894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739194,0.0002803401,0.00033928268,0.00013756212,0.0006110386,0.0012398255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999114,0.00021903259,0.00017244225,0.00007088444,0.00030821483,0.00011543277],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012460669,0.00011864276,0.0002543353,0.000020708992,0.0013811133,0.000054652235,0.0003345159,0.000037483416,0.000050538503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078483735,0.00008079413,0.000102499966,0.00015063703,0.0010861668,0.00012952587,0.000085744476,0.0008879999,0.00004921407],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023505783,0.000029693398,0.003703797,0.0000036741465,0.0002827294,0.0000057425623,0.006004772,0.000013792137,0.0000075310127,0.98502195,0.003697466,0.0012053761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029962102,0.00022136202,0.0011674361,0.000012669666,0.00010310472,0.000031722626,0.0666039,0.000009970329,0.000015593825,0.8548663,0.07653431,0.00013397055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052270917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009541262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58620876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005654328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004261525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3142767516","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1407","title":"Deference to Legislatures: The Case of the 2018 Ontario Better Local Government Act","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Legislature; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Judicial deference; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02903838877367183,"score_gpt":0.305100085928771,"score_spread":0.2760616971550992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3142767516","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7828654,0.0002454954,0.00004686351,0.09072221,0.00037740037,0.00007225625,0.000015911473,0.0000018772251,0.12565255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919625,0.000033554432,0.00001668993,0.006299061,0.0012836804,6.569535e-7,4.2140943e-8,0.0000014961113,0.00040233368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920696,0.00011099169,0.00016362117,0.000050292238,0.0003369041,0.0001312373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996026,0.000069723224,0.000119673154,0.000041939133,0.00011788788,0.000048184796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002654365,0.000051829757,0.00013049417,0.0000064555866,0.0010829597,0.000041211035,0.00012720453,0.000045008186,0.000024277017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007417984,0.000028549497,0.0001109227,0.000100531324,0.0007296069,0.00006372677,0.000083412844,0.00016752654,9.872319e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018444864,0.00003063744,0.0010266674,0.0000019455915,0.00006586246,0.000063688785,0.046229187,0.000001553867,0.000035812624,0.9449574,0.0032705958,0.0042982427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034888144,0.00007518275,0.035188295,0.00005185214,0.00010369283,0.00019488219,0.028123403,2.3738161e-7,0.00017492115,0.08681377,0.8487912,0.0001336949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26283726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6356301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85814357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021972826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008289834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.832936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3142805592","doi":"","title":"The Study of Legal Plurality Outside 'Legal Pluralism': The Future of the Discipline?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Pluralism (philosophy); Monism; Legal realism; Political science; Law; Politics; Normative; Contradiction; Empirical legal studies; Legal formalism; Epistemology; Suspect; Law and economics; Legal research; Sociology; Philosophy; Comparative law; Black letter law; Private law","score_opus":0.008825240800614772,"score_gpt":0.27767644477218817,"score_spread":0.2688512039715734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3142805592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9259265,0.0029305755,0.000068187095,0.05569943,0.0011824131,0.00035869147,0.000004495363,0.000011888987,0.013817839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970531,0.0009055745,0.0000011951142,0.00008827125,0.0013290152,0.0000050274966,1.834933e-7,0.000004327424,0.0006133346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972886,0.00062553765,0.0003440229,0.00011020902,0.00074452115,0.0008871086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990193,0.00022158794,0.00032264285,0.00019999946,0.00020032354,0.00003612882],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036108405,0.00010626567,0.00017988126,0.000015372576,0.0033725102,0.00006945715,0.0008904188,0.00004125037,0.0000063891357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021203399,0.000043362066,0.00017755396,0.00027573443,0.0009863885,0.00013148911,0.00013801001,0.00096879347,0.0000018146029],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037096583,0.00007305186,0.007862166,6.122632e-7,0.00013024687,1.6903311e-7,0.003500789,0.000026017293,0.000012908921,0.9804105,0.00016746308,0.0077789472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006953161,0.00034776726,0.0801814,0.000019901601,0.00015063921,0.000022059467,0.24390727,0.00001157423,0.000027010401,0.53227574,0.14219622,0.00016510946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009875091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25401294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4481348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002194158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001311827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3143583593","doi":"10.1017/9781139236249.012","title":"Sovereignty and the Spirit of Legality","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Law; Sovereignty; Parliament; Political science; Rule of law; Parliamentary sovereignty; Economic Justice; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.0357097729379468,"score_gpt":0.2232978202638527,"score_spread":0.1875880473259059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3143583593","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003346806,0.00051452115,0.000023202987,0.00066279416,0.00009759903,0.0002655316,0.00015106521,0.000030361367,0.99822146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14652479,0.00048596147,0.000009175753,0.0001616082,0.00020714203,3.276646e-7,0.0000036278616,0.0000058073642,0.8526016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992171,0.00006779134,0.00011377423,0.00020277462,0.00028269007,0.00011585436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940073,0.00012882893,0.0001485053,0.00011654024,0.00012686537,0.00007853008],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001808104,0.00012959851,0.00030312806,0.000022190667,0.00060078147,0.00002057196,0.00026736088,0.00013388283,0.000010029971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004207475,0.00011195381,0.00014224373,0.0000070572587,0.0038223506,0.00004403259,0.00028193815,0.00020697758,0.0000031348438],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010861052,0.0000020479142,0.0000052544137,0.000014526125,0.00010250761,0.000015677051,0.00029904707,9.541378e-8,5.6380213e-7,0.9935328,0.0055291443,0.000389766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042550438,0.000010599733,0.000033151453,0.0000442765,0.00016385666,5.3446877e-7,0.0003790121,0.0000012198323,0.000007036734,0.004712953,0.9940932,0.00012867761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076913754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012146788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9888198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057540023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019604314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3145013333","doi":"","title":"The Costs and Benefits of Constitutional Options for Québec and Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chapters","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Business","score_opus":0.02018647471530021,"score_gpt":0.25117987379127604,"score_spread":0.23099339907597582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3145013333","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9587011,0.001797276,0.00004383829,0.018302148,0.00055719755,0.00018955428,0.00008462853,0.000007146407,0.020317132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99948114,0.0002478257,0.000038994236,0.000097106655,0.00006819612,0.000009441004,6.4900416e-7,5.419281e-7,0.000056115965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999747,0.000004322043,0.000048751706,0.0000495727,0.000078833415,0.00007151412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996543,0.0002045108,0.000020137146,0.000021061394,0.00006317818,0.000036806545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009937775,0.00002598205,0.000039061284,0.0000056635017,0.0009837074,0.00001075744,0.000036205794,0.000014213717,0.000004070855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013849695,0.000019019708,0.000008603436,0.000016350756,0.0022169526,0.000024998786,0.000013740398,0.000027140193,1.5218797e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030308397,0.0000015933327,0.00612518,6.223838e-7,0.0000071014997,5.5357642e-8,0.00021152906,8.588575e-7,0.000027154974,0.98918664,0.00026285203,0.0041733705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032534375,0.000021811136,0.08366575,0.000018729628,0.000026293917,0.0000031248985,0.0056747706,0.00001141793,0.00006959421,0.0135940015,0.8964534,0.0001357943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93466985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9755927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022182412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005644877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8168455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3145936774","doi":"","title":"A Separate Head of Judicial Review: Divergent Paths in Common Law Rights Review","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Statutory law; Law; Judicial review; Common law; Proportionality (law); Humanities; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02906881381432984,"score_gpt":0.32784598537569914,"score_spread":0.2987771715613693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3145936774","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014847638,0.8983342,0.000051640534,0.043720845,0.0002441323,0.00050736364,0.000008039477,0.000022981589,0.04226314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53201336,0.46465015,0.0000033300812,0.0030721948,0.00022324121,0.000004767758,0.0000011653294,0.0000023344799,0.00002946163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764144,0.0003095302,0.00047562938,0.00014353123,0.00046693903,0.0009629474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994629,0.00003853553,0.00021638956,0.00005688635,0.00011755504,0.00010775129],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017281927,0.00011031695,0.00045605903,0.00002164705,0.00050370756,0.000009308133,0.00026898962,0.000039473467,0.000092767914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009161887,0.00008987222,0.00015904247,0.00041424207,0.0002787873,0.00012493534,0.000049108246,0.0007228512,0.00004696542],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025358628,0.000051732033,0.0008946686,0.00011251916,0.000060815004,0.000009813283,0.00047797803,0.0000014512456,0.000008816627,0.99233234,0.0023947032,0.0036297867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004043668,0.00024837925,0.00032569136,0.003939486,0.00012712363,0.000014922491,0.000447233,0.0000017658265,0.00001066279,0.65388274,0.34038052,0.00021711514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009751644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0994649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5171657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037772825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014110815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3150649281","doi":"","title":"Marshalling the Data: An Empirical Analysis of Canada’s s. 24(2) Case Law in the Wake of R. v. Grant","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.09477046435274979,"score_gpt":0.3277565290984168,"score_spread":0.23298606474566702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3150649281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9644907,0.004109017,0.0003189955,0.004989656,0.00016995588,0.00014153087,0.000039096994,0.0000046310474,0.025736393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989103,0.0007733798,0.000013621372,0.00018003647,0.0000935119,0.0000011847402,0.0000022266556,0.0000018712393,0.00002387311],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981681,0.00033040362,0.00026451764,0.0001072693,0.00043571976,0.00069400086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941754,0.00013279745,0.00014106435,0.00018125233,0.000092131355,0.000035182697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040038214,0.00006189592,0.00017840936,0.00005075649,0.0007243105,0.000012809015,0.0006388956,0.00002859964,0.000022817432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000096296375,0.000033927536,0.00006749285,0.00055756076,0.00044523875,0.00012468324,0.000044186207,0.0005098207,1.7042285e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021778502,0.000083897605,0.018424848,8.29793e-7,0.0005621088,0.00006393104,0.0135205155,0.000035391284,0.0000037541542,0.96609247,0.0000851366,0.001105368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005014413,0.00023672987,0.038848393,0.000025520114,0.0018750285,0.00057078374,0.44742766,0.0003607811,0.000014841111,0.49761143,0.012201527,0.00032585106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9358256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99925566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.468481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022519242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046217763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8198833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3151042431","doi":"","title":"The Unbroken Supremacy of the Canadian Constitution","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; White supremacy; Political science; State (computer science); Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Supremacy Clause; Federalism; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.016774236279800066,"score_gpt":0.2879651494642194,"score_spread":0.27119091318441935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3151042431","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11654895,0.0058934647,0.00009538241,0.082328685,0.0022153303,0.00029554358,0.0000069768766,0.000012510146,0.79260314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954411,0.0028581491,0.0000015755843,0.0000647531,0.00035414976,0.0000017685901,9.545236e-8,0.0000014322505,0.001276975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842906,0.00008947724,0.00012276838,0.000058830166,0.0003041292,0.0009957572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941474,0.00004798453,0.00016857167,0.00014604646,0.0001572553,0.000065401466],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018555681,0.00004991122,0.00006763406,0.000016698648,0.017252868,0.00016562142,0.0007024703,0.000038805585,0.000009735432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006873601,0.000027407936,0.00008181227,0.000054982953,0.002202507,0.00013055219,0.000041312196,0.0005407123,0.000010272152],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036925808,0.000003053093,0.018884536,1.622277e-7,0.00003781105,3.1629006e-7,0.00023336276,0.0000016198125,0.000006003929,0.9761034,0.00016013524,0.0045658792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001212957,0.000014185402,0.028719075,0.000013619933,0.000020700181,0.000014050088,0.0030492772,0.0000010655527,0.000015279538,0.80309725,0.16488062,0.000053583433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6712673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9942612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8788922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00094540394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016404936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98917115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154768688","doi":"","title":"Legislating Statutory Interpretation: The Parliamentary Regulation of Judicial Discretion","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Statute; Legislature; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Discretion; Legislation; Law; Theme (computing); Judicial interpretation; Statutory law; Judicial discretion; Judicial review; Legislative history","score_opus":0.01233941976184579,"score_gpt":0.28336822193711086,"score_spread":0.2710288021752651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154768688","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74766517,0.0042476826,0.12399661,0.01480286,0.002320059,0.00046668062,0.000006806384,0.00006684969,0.1064273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997414,0.00070550013,0.00005075251,0.000103779166,0.0014890754,0.0000026584848,0.0000013459265,0.0000033297401,0.00022955523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856675,0.0001708369,0.00021119206,0.00008031609,0.00036554097,0.0006053927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948156,0.00006893919,0.00019120058,0.000048822796,0.00018464244,0.000024852503],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017066678,0.00005803278,0.00008430715,0.000035608526,0.0013493903,0.00003024268,0.0001476542,0.000032024625,0.00008206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010960703,0.00004210584,0.00006150951,0.0001683869,0.0008461278,0.00023821817,0.000016780525,0.00035089412,0.000010059629],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007319441,0.000017629522,0.0021479,7.0798137e-7,0.00008374736,1.4923661e-7,0.008044148,0.00001576201,0.00017567449,0.9128004,0.00014052266,0.07650021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019814329,0.00021457046,0.008718034,0.000041052543,0.00004604031,0.000008331147,0.045570094,0.00008392243,0.00006976721,0.93704396,0.007911829,0.00009425121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003939719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02944958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24974886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045355197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015261493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154912574","doi":"10.1086/714576","title":"The Emerging Authority of Magistrate Judges within US District Courts","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Courts","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Magistrate; Adjudication; Political science; Law; Discretion; Supreme court; Delegation; Hierarchy","score_opus":0.025616823907762352,"score_gpt":0.30600119334209236,"score_spread":0.28038436943433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154912574","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84577346,0.008938817,0.00008761482,0.012357018,0.0010421132,0.000046942616,0.000009566536,0.0000065644613,0.13173789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974991,0.0017568644,0.000053610027,0.00014228892,0.0003084758,3.9410847e-7,2.3309633e-7,0.0000016789645,0.00023734332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904966,0.00010145083,0.00027494374,0.000060859245,0.00038472321,0.00012836485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911875,0.0001422221,0.0002588046,0.00004533861,0.00036229342,0.00007257758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078955095,0.000055065182,0.00015485802,0.000010795258,0.0009175747,0.000069005146,0.00009714986,0.00003164788,0.000018704031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000168059,0.00003618888,0.000070216636,0.00007155467,0.0006258533,0.000112224305,0.000031388634,0.00012430336,6.2125804e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023735245,0.00003878176,0.007917696,0.0000048698294,0.00007139716,0.000079818856,0.0017122199,0.000009708587,0.000110508314,0.9871548,0.00082872633,0.0020477627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005993127,0.00014266216,0.061849542,0.00017035207,0.00021092726,0.0001329428,0.015285071,0.000014812723,0.0008905246,0.42453563,0.49592367,0.0002445396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009706754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025161167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56261915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025646645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031614947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70573354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3156030424","doi":"10.25071/1920-7336.40655","title":"Not Just the Luck of the Draw? Exploring Competency of Counsel and Other Qualitative Factors in Federal Court Refugee Leave Determinations (2005-2010)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Refuge Canada s Journal on Refuge","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Luck; Immigration; Political science; Law; Representation (politics); Psychology; Demographic economics; Economics","score_opus":0.08430602922756548,"score_gpt":0.33323567828207185,"score_spread":0.24892964905450637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3156030424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938742,0.00066084624,0.0000061082624,0.003702743,0.00068942964,0.00012030581,0.00008956463,0.0000038169233,0.0008529855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99843943,0.00032801632,0.000027910233,0.0007350142,0.00012878679,0.000006873877,8.194719e-7,0.000007853507,0.00032532067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976338,0.0005608902,0.00046838657,0.0001560846,0.00087199605,0.000308842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985672,0.00051685475,0.0003470308,0.00013888605,0.00032496927,0.00010503013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007991692,0.00013972873,0.00030037944,0.000057182333,0.0011466322,0.000043305936,0.0002603283,0.00005416802,0.000069288995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005133034,0.000085483065,0.00009488509,0.0003180133,0.0007046844,0.00013287869,0.000052565203,0.0003800532,4.7777746e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044220622,0.00007423508,0.013846097,0.000015984506,0.00010300957,0.000032989177,0.006897968,0.000039030252,0.0003236809,0.97823894,0.00020920148,0.00017467175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061336136,0.00007385906,0.12870449,0.00042046112,0.000049738082,0.000024905603,0.015525754,0.000007094441,0.0013313709,0.0076484126,0.8453173,0.00028323173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026113395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5051692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9705905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040860093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023602103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9803718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3156787638","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3633","title":"The Relevance of Government Practice in Constitutional Decision-Making: A Review of the Supreme Court’s Federalism Jurisprudence","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Relevance (law); Government (linguistics); Federalism; Law; Political science; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.043166527319637486,"score_gpt":0.379245248506796,"score_spread":0.3360787211871585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3156787638","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[1.0732337e-7,0.8067188,0.00008230303,0.0031258196,0.00081192725,0.000382995,0.000055200202,0.0000028285058,0.18882002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025429889,0.9961371,0.00042376542,0.00048392257,0.00029232155,0.000026706726,8.7696486e-7,0.0000070894916,0.000085232714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944123,0.0012803774,0.0013199168,0.00024344218,0.0024161458,0.0003278399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99161905,0.0055225687,0.0018519779,0.00028566612,0.0006470618,0.000073685755],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038899935,0.00023829871,0.0011070931,0.000017723936,0.0020489134,0.000104928324,0.0010027258,0.00014880794,0.000080739745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011241383,0.00013373443,0.00065134285,0.00047260162,0.0029179025,0.00022602564,0.0002886693,0.00082240795,0.0000058324717],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069307484,0.00006462813,0.0000061585,0.0009989052,0.000119161945,0.000028043203,0.000088570756,0.0000024328206,4.5905146e-8,0.8548143,0.0017155198,0.14215529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000664374,0.000010067983,0.000004116349,0.15143685,0.00028114452,0.00016766704,0.00029223127,1.4490436e-7,1.6314915e-7,0.02250541,0.82511777,0.00011796958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00410854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039029267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8323089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056619843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027540352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3156867361","doi":"10.25909/28891115.v1","title":"NO AMENDMENT? NO PROBLEM: JUDGES, “INFORMAL AMENDMENT,” AND THE EVOLUTION OF CONSTITUTIONAL MEANING IN THE FEDERAL DEMOCRACIES OF AUSTRALIA, CANADA, INDIA, AND THE UNITED STATES","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pepperdine Digital Commons (Pepperdine University)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Democracy; Law; Meaning (existential); Constitutional amendment; Political science; Politics; Original meaning; Originalism; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011718585945748953,"score_gpt":0.22358262644079838,"score_spread":0.21186404049504942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3156867361","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5290363,0.00031696656,0.00010380911,0.011439263,0.000119975746,0.00075664674,0.00027447307,0.00001873508,0.45793384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99741125,0.00015849377,0.000013757838,0.00016474142,0.000027084006,0.0000050193153,0.000045150242,0.0000020153798,0.002172489],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986622,0.00020322096,0.00030037967,0.00016108324,0.00038843902,0.00028469856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857974,0.00081104896,0.00016372457,0.00011778017,0.00028208585,0.00004559316],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056613353,0.0001595048,0.00030833183,0.00021820927,0.0012742564,0.0001035006,0.0003685469,0.00004816237,0.000012644052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027327915,0.00009963797,0.00007461629,0.0009335772,0.006891597,0.00038703048,0.00030606636,0.00020581666,0.0000011222241],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003931791,0.000042247968,0.058308147,0.000017861988,0.00012018921,0.0000046868236,0.0022287488,0.00010316202,0.0000037128787,0.93732923,0.0013670435,0.00008177272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.022879563,0.00037511453,0.06990674,0.0007197349,0.0006069148,0.000037961934,0.27455378,0.0008016999,0.000035954545,0.06837333,0.5606031,0.0011061551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45281175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29753783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8689559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002457811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005840339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157144089","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Courts in Federal Countries. Federalists or Unitarists?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.014579046010599997,"score_gpt":0.3083440828601392,"score_spread":0.2937650368495392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157144089","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008555519,0.8164778,0.00036851905,0.06974012,0.0011708445,0.0005563357,0.0000059849995,0.00008565134,0.103039265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36582392,0.5862236,0.000012665393,0.02549899,0.0019635542,0.000012938488,0.0000022757656,0.0000117655345,0.020450277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969596,0.00019304438,0.00031412544,0.00016758524,0.00051028054,0.0018553602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934673,0.00006771501,0.0001291134,0.00007245175,0.00028525805,0.00009874701],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021979671,0.00013230256,0.0002449791,0.00006269195,0.002025101,0.000107012194,0.00026867408,0.00007197948,0.0014142327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030003453,0.000104111954,0.000072958246,0.00025067074,0.00069613906,0.00031537816,0.000037210328,0.00081328844,0.00019619474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015053285,0.00007245004,0.0050589554,0.000015545927,0.00010594596,0.000034334094,0.0012019718,5.251411e-7,0.0000017939021,0.6357382,0.3548318,0.0027879532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030885026,0.0001433481,0.0006053949,0.00022056865,0.0000133017365,0.00006440042,0.0013256593,7.403915e-7,0.0000017692677,0.09591989,0.9012421,0.00015399806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072329603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21789482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54641026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016312969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072501106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157468406","doi":"","title":"Has the Supreme Court of Canada Rejected ‘Originalism’?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queen's law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Law; Original meaning; Constitutionalism; Supreme court; Constitutional law; Constitutional theory; Political science; Scholarship; Sociology; Politics; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Democracy; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02278282913622767,"score_gpt":0.25779704028941336,"score_spread":0.2350142111531857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157468406","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08404345,0.0006320633,0.00046338094,0.37672067,0.002552712,0.00022521909,0.000053224696,0.000038678903,0.5352706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99765646,0.00017734065,0.000029883971,0.0004372343,0.0006974196,0.000001893627,1.6328345e-7,0.000002846022,0.000996726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873763,0.00014763637,0.00018939885,0.0000713526,0.00059369445,0.00026028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920285,0.00019265444,0.00012579147,0.00006935314,0.00030915657,0.00010021913],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005345038,0.000065258304,0.0001168712,0.000012815611,0.0022476334,0.000044038276,0.00025320172,0.000031268697,0.00036538357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018447831,0.000032630738,0.000055475048,0.000111174915,0.0010865523,0.000117591175,0.000024079694,0.00011121662,0.0000057436578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016598167,0.000012473159,0.0029669937,7.7086526e-7,0.00004589157,0.000016620726,0.0005483957,0.0000014226497,0.000068552166,0.95273125,0.042949878,0.00064116344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019308587,0.000019892877,0.005530655,0.00004629109,0.00001807254,0.000010323868,0.0014121921,1.8724164e-7,0.00016501304,0.05188245,0.9406449,0.000076911434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9056515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9371584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.913613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020593581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001665728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99905133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157557574","doi":"","title":"Oxford LibGuides: Canada : legal resources: Legislation : provincial & territorial","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Law; Business; Public administration","score_opus":0.025300442343208388,"score_gpt":0.25543467491921523,"score_spread":0.23013423257600685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157557574","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039677275,0.0009355822,0.000027320106,0.003332012,0.02007189,0.00050777924,0.00023551818,0.00018873361,0.9743044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13737953,0.003312954,0.0006366992,0.0041363994,0.23724116,0.00029666087,0.0005600597,0.00013981934,0.6162967],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969946,0.0001739386,0.0005431904,0.00048649366,0.0011644755,0.0006373078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882233,0.00015720818,0.00028090618,0.0001975087,0.00034276064,0.00019930086],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043272556,0.00034567318,0.00047152038,0.00009822163,0.0017604135,0.00018735691,0.00064466184,0.0004587074,0.0009301093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056758284,0.00031029028,0.000163217,0.00024360229,0.00070154195,0.0003080686,0.00016919487,0.00041993565,0.00002330369],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033219156,0.000022468133,0.0003823527,0.000010605763,0.00007624919,0.000018720859,0.0018565916,5.163656e-7,3.4837643e-7,0.15705012,0.8367635,0.0037853096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014050328,0.000034511082,0.0002585522,0.00007651611,0.0000654912,8.661565e-7,0.0018080588,5.419172e-7,0.000002234486,0.005405395,0.9917929,0.00041443342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9986701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3580077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008551156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01255259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158348143","doi":"10.1111/gove.12594","title":"Institutional proximity and judicial corruption: A spatial approach","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Governance","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; Politics; Language change; Context (archaeology); Political science; China; Complement (music); Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.0272471462032246,"score_gpt":0.2656881602014818,"score_spread":0.23844101399825718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158348143","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1863437,0.0048458395,0.01018321,0.007186402,0.0013278085,0.00026439317,0.000085840344,0.000100476114,0.78966236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99681544,0.00071389315,0.0005497237,0.0003773758,0.00087891315,0.000016194532,0.0000054542184,0.0000019500392,0.00064105453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991122,0.000046602247,0.00009735525,0.00019949095,0.00037831307,0.00016602899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996953,0.00002671242,0.000050350423,0.000053802956,0.000115636285,0.000058168804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014181329,0.00006423609,0.000104086364,0.0000055207565,0.000953273,0.00004112662,0.000067063316,0.000050606915,0.00009158483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028652378,0.000065397944,0.00003221566,0.00015659552,0.0007299494,0.00018253113,0.000068204456,0.00008676167,0.000020236068],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013107974,0.000059815124,0.011810056,0.0000040964737,0.000012085118,0.00001564081,0.00070422754,0.000007077325,0.000026434207,0.9743257,0.00063353195,0.012388194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048625038,0.00001736487,0.41171208,0.000040059855,0.000022225115,0.000022641307,0.00076255767,0.00007780973,0.000057539943,0.035395727,0.5511552,0.00025056227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007350871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006585493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93893003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008837846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005627126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158489386","doi":"","title":"The Use of Non-domestic Legal Sources in Supreme Court of Canada Judgments: Is this the Judicial Slowbalization of the Court?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Empirical legal studies; Empirical research; Perspective (graphical); Comparative law","score_opus":0.018528258978921353,"score_gpt":0.2499574918052835,"score_spread":0.23142923282636216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158489386","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8824477,0.0046670046,0.0007177802,0.10579393,0.00074339565,0.0005493328,0.000042145377,0.00000702454,0.005031699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966897,0.0024569654,0.000002905216,0.00048600763,0.00018876231,0.0000024987437,3.325961e-7,0.0000041546114,0.00016871761],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978548,0.00020992332,0.00038978164,0.00008881833,0.0008002539,0.0006563765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990243,0.00025836725,0.00036562505,0.00008228229,0.00023071036,0.000038745533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010624939,0.00008602044,0.00018539141,0.000019398109,0.0009200096,0.000027331416,0.00047726923,0.000037262882,0.000022404452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004965239,0.000046341906,0.00009086443,0.00042954396,0.00071880815,0.00011685758,0.000060699214,0.0004906769,4.897539e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030103352,0.00012464933,0.07081426,0.000015990903,0.0006341832,0.000003087734,0.020789891,0.0019874324,0.0006595077,0.88698053,0.0136214495,0.004067954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003961263,0.0011668034,0.10596572,0.000611525,0.00077582826,0.00005565862,0.16272463,0.0029167368,0.002411428,0.36101264,0.35738698,0.0010108051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49848497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85359734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52596796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004076612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008811789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99680734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159992687","doi":"","title":"On the Limits of Proportionality","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Normative; Legitimacy; Rationality; CONTEST; Law and economics; Assertion; Norm (philosophy); Paragraph; Political science; Law; Economics; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.04444817373152012,"score_gpt":0.3024261887617236,"score_spread":0.2579780150302035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159992687","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58359003,0.002361478,0.0013120107,0.27635983,0.00022379737,0.00023717791,0.0000042570427,0.00003214704,0.13587928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975152,0.0011263293,0.0000032078515,0.0008525363,0.00036998608,0.0000017859335,1.9045909e-7,0.0000016416345,0.00012912312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882734,0.000098539225,0.0001241856,0.000060811974,0.00036320376,0.0005258916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996516,0.000091308575,0.000089520654,0.000027379354,0.00009853883,0.000041614614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011120203,0.00004074391,0.00007089733,0.000008783,0.00063594204,0.000011848334,0.00016408596,0.000020552501,0.00007588432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055611745,0.000024986215,0.00006455588,0.00014830654,0.0002879345,0.000044504774,0.00001103739,0.00047853557,0.000025313764],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019605144,0.000017438837,0.0010174881,3.9891788e-7,0.000039001414,3.5387117e-7,0.00064828095,0.0000048620304,0.000024452738,0.99614835,0.0003083318,0.0017714602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007184247,0.00010896027,0.0011852881,0.0000054745556,0.000009768171,0.0000021595883,0.0049014846,0.0000015779889,0.000035104073,0.9835402,0.010099578,0.000038572274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003868592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001428363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41392517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015272721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021994084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48912162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159992947","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190075774.003.0012","title":"Conclusion The American and Westminster Models","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Political science; Human rights; Law; Supreme court; Judicial review; Politics; Charter; Common law; Democracy; International human rights law; Legislation","score_opus":0.04697883692099785,"score_gpt":0.28744259304928504,"score_spread":0.2404637561282872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159992947","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015212741,0.0022616426,0.00007162694,0.0073123737,0.00013913473,0.00009607406,0.000006662497,0.000023539302,0.9899368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12101458,0.009585991,0.000053560867,0.0037033153,0.0005950908,0.00000512442,0.0000039453607,0.000007906493,0.86503047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993411,0.00002005555,0.0000915374,0.00016051317,0.0002747259,0.00011208074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963564,0.00009856829,0.00006582844,0.00007205698,0.00008466568,0.0000432176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011903107,0.000098162185,0.00017759092,0.000014668293,0.0009337653,0.000046576464,0.000094396644,0.000051607378,0.00031139728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013005472,0.00006159716,0.000056427347,0.00002176168,0.0020091687,0.000043910626,0.00018368824,0.00010888599,0.00002774389],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017261087,0.0000018143962,0.000010523713,6.4898717e-7,0.000023681017,0.0000045436605,0.00060368126,4.9553546e-7,5.121166e-7,0.98692435,0.0017601874,0.0106678475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002263838,0.000009804822,0.00003834169,0.000024762605,0.000022796545,9.0901045e-7,0.001022688,0.0000037625434,2.5164655e-7,0.27192333,0.7268363,0.00009435779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062624225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0116972765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72507614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033437263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015615868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94669515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160425844","doi":"","title":"The Role of Constitutional Courts, A Comparative Perspective: The Supreme Court of Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Original jurisdiction; Political science; Certiorari; Court of record; Jurisdiction; Judicial independence; Constitutional court; Constitution; Constitutional law; Judicial review; Law of the case","score_opus":0.009795059525455362,"score_gpt":0.26541806858976996,"score_spread":0.2556230090643146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160425844","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48399004,0.04991695,0.00028778205,0.025605783,0.0009752294,0.0006235982,0.00005017312,0.000011334396,0.43853912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975207,0.0017357584,0.0000027658352,0.000037546866,0.00015608474,0.000002597665,3.7135695e-7,0.0000014664231,0.00054270687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818385,0.00015079652,0.00019901273,0.000078955665,0.00062894507,0.00075841544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883527,0.0003254405,0.00019487587,0.00006849061,0.00053973345,0.0000361842],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014283664,0.000071485985,0.00015689309,0.00001587888,0.0013618647,0.000017436925,0.00032691052,0.000024830677,0.00004295865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011837183,0.00004086558,0.00007620031,0.00013159393,0.0019873222,0.00006744878,0.000028746455,0.0005106784,0.0000034710863],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037189457,0.000017191833,0.005465159,3.3917354e-7,0.0001874091,1.8003503e-7,0.0014174134,0.00005255563,0.00005842556,0.9922741,0.00032298235,0.00016703375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001938282,0.00005992125,0.0020002823,0.000012494474,0.000024982695,0.000016640059,0.22153471,0.000015011586,0.00007114992,0.71320564,0.06279854,0.00006676929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41753718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8678503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5135307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010874923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024360616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160732781","doi":"","title":"The Unwritten Principle of Democracy","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Interpretation (philosophy); Legitimacy; Political science; Law; Separation of powers; Constitutionalism; Relevance (law); Supreme court; Law and economics; Constitutional review; Secession; Federalism; Politics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009112665712134647,"score_gpt":0.28057566925096455,"score_spread":0.2714630035388299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160732781","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86460865,0.0072254436,0.00025684768,0.012009824,0.00053787447,0.00018311554,9.732607e-7,0.000019462555,0.115157805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98794985,0.007964809,0.000007416952,0.000046525824,0.00025563358,0.0000011121621,1.3087883e-7,0.000002616854,0.0037719023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984207,0.0000813065,0.00014706519,0.00006301075,0.00031807326,0.00096982304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995741,0.00011458321,0.000102603866,0.00006012479,0.000116180956,0.00003238768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001791995,0.000046803416,0.00008573118,0.00001856352,0.0011762884,0.000026056523,0.00025949732,0.0000279778,0.000032314947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013376647,0.000030168929,0.00007224884,0.0001371008,0.00025542433,0.00009119878,0.00003184386,0.0004551726,0.00006597761],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011791972,0.000009896528,0.016278792,3.66466e-7,0.00005006821,1.8586036e-7,0.00021922054,0.0000031675595,0.000036179626,0.97724295,0.000035947498,0.0061114137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014099616,0.000058115285,0.004350114,0.0000071802906,0.000010461701,0.000008326165,0.0066762175,0.0000019094011,0.000014261124,0.8784711,0.11020983,0.000051513445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00081922463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071761766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.123341195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029976032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026207706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9047178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161683026","doi":"10.1353/llt.2021.0011","title":"The Class Politics of Law: Essays Inspired by Harry Glasbeek ed. by Eric Tucker and Judy Fudge","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Labour / Le Travail","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Capitalism; Law; Sociology; Economic Justice; Critical legal studies; Legal profession; Political science; Legal realism","score_opus":0.013976544223066423,"score_gpt":0.24821355834672015,"score_spread":0.23423701412365372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161683026","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7710459,0.05327394,0.000077903576,0.018584827,0.0005327911,0.00022886333,0.000443048,0.00007681474,0.15573591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988495,0.004484933,0.000027343713,0.0011163525,0.00014196825,0.000011228415,0.000008656236,0.0000066299494,0.0057078665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988524,0.00015534651,0.00018993531,0.00017809855,0.00030941493,0.0003148442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994066,0.00016259802,0.00006569744,0.00010471053,0.00016592171,0.00009448581],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023691884,0.00009843816,0.0001738083,0.000008600252,0.0013708804,0.000084310144,0.00015005248,0.00007205799,0.000043207798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010873564,0.00008074144,0.000045562054,0.00017695298,0.001502146,0.000110029854,0.00005981808,0.00010776688,0.000015811964],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072639914,0.000094091716,0.001153119,0.00001030763,0.000050296196,0.000006909908,0.0020458156,2.411166e-7,0.002035157,0.9471494,0.045299243,0.002148161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032518845,0.000026319634,0.0039930847,0.000017319517,0.000022096638,0.0000021264275,0.005432938,0.000001985989,0.0013564031,0.02275691,0.9659186,0.00014704792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016419098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0096420655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92439246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003589184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026305328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161718383","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190075774.003.0002","title":"The Common Law Legal Tradition: First Things First","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Law; Common law; Public law; Comparative law; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Private law; Sources of law; Municipal law; Judicial review; Legal history; Supreme court","score_opus":0.03570353943683208,"score_gpt":0.25373519576677883,"score_spread":0.21803165632994675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161718383","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000003367588,0.0027991857,0.000008097106,0.046583153,0.0008883698,0.00014773225,0.0000210012,0.000080215934,0.94946885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0732677,0.004671526,0.000020312753,0.003242763,0.0021763348,0.000021031625,0.000030229685,0.000015144973,0.9165549],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875367,0.000020202544,0.00021594854,0.00022805543,0.00055951544,0.00022258174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991651,0.00040061498,0.00008806449,0.00014599331,0.00012434289,0.00007586252],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002525269,0.00017688249,0.00023635825,0.000013580198,0.0069547393,0.00026632106,0.00030336375,0.0001931981,0.001427314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025369001,0.00012603993,0.00020464578,0.000034407807,0.0020256615,0.00017285,0.00008870405,0.00029117154,0.00023650007],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003262826,0.000006432418,0.000003858528,0.0000031195723,0.0000605774,0.000023849372,0.0005342006,3.5149446e-7,2.0134852e-8,0.9690009,0.029893432,0.00046999392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035564975,0.000008711797,0.000011752164,0.000065807704,0.000026054637,0.0000020626871,0.0005669092,3.315744e-7,4.393319e-7,0.273956,0.7251928,0.0001335821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02698788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3790182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6952993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014010917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023674649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161763644","doi":"","title":"The Sovereign Citizen Movement: A Comparative Analysis with Similar Foreign Movements and Takeaways for the United States Judicial System","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Political science; Movement (music); Political economy; Sovereign state; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.02946900266551563,"score_gpt":0.2776280789108696,"score_spread":0.24815907624535397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161763644","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3091015,0.0132765975,0.01460237,0.013611634,0.0008166489,0.004893623,0.0012811439,0.0003867395,0.64202976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966087,0.00044662377,0.000113141316,0.0018209743,0.0002542825,0.00018907424,0.00005667854,0.000006282955,0.0005042873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832976,0.000197023,0.00024905428,0.00028612398,0.0005432298,0.0003947879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830544,0.0008016249,0.00013980734,0.00018127369,0.0004527929,0.00011905079],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060327444,0.00016567032,0.00030108402,0.000039200833,0.004817851,0.00032466796,0.00023650206,0.00004995695,0.000045458033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008568143,0.00009631044,0.000119300305,0.0009128492,0.0009881592,0.00012246805,0.00008987129,0.00012310095,0.0000071298045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008763086,0.000024764398,0.003134323,0.0000067767414,0.0014720021,0.0000062264876,0.0014697447,0.00069955306,0.0000062632907,0.99218893,0.00082303473,0.00008073865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026597162,0.0002548873,0.010841066,0.00016607951,0.0022612032,0.0000019268593,0.34817976,0.004077273,0.00039888578,0.34292558,0.28749904,0.00073461124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01896198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058897227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68750715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012843245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019274544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162093189","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190075774.003.0003","title":"The Diffuse and Second Look Models of Judicial Review","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Supreme court; Judicial review; Political science; Law; Statute; Judicial independence; Duty; Legislature; Democracy; Constitutional law; Separation of powers; Politics","score_opus":0.046526235912078634,"score_gpt":0.27984802004986076,"score_spread":0.23332178413778212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162093189","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000007091855,0.19096763,0.000010492225,0.002282672,0.0001442051,0.00016826122,0.000017731649,0.000009812414,0.8063921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027227446,0.4381238,0.000014089601,0.0010551733,0.00031791712,0.000006670774,0.0000033552915,0.000006031421,0.5577502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991113,0.000027183785,0.00023564628,0.00016223484,0.000335451,0.00012821222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936575,0.00017933178,0.00011844771,0.000103648876,0.0001842578,0.00004854831],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029527914,0.00011509857,0.000324459,0.00001303111,0.00065562176,0.000023038041,0.00013358927,0.00009929692,0.0009841378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000063778745,0.000076285665,0.000110795256,0.00002377116,0.0013523021,0.000047554902,0.00011682636,0.00012135052,0.000012637965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015716616,0.0000040709574,0.00000148319,0.000042387404,0.000054466367,0.0000030119993,0.00012529966,3.2920603e-8,2.7320252e-7,0.98470044,0.008906466,0.006160474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003597341,0.0000053935514,0.000003910497,0.0005277221,0.000054204877,6.539462e-7,0.00012392875,3.366527e-7,4.781825e-7,0.36990792,0.62926304,0.00007645335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009503368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01541152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62035656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025046333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031504978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162140798","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190075774.003.0006","title":"Canada: From Privy Council to Supreme Court","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Federalism; Judicial review; Separation of powers; Charter; Constitution; Politics","score_opus":0.07304754403190365,"score_gpt":0.24602819489990807,"score_spread":0.1729806508680044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162140798","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000025780535,0.001632871,0.000022680535,0.014013727,0.00095966464,0.00015829965,0.00029235135,0.000036362602,0.98285824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008558944,0.00052673917,0.00010239874,0.0053076367,0.0014113944,0.000007592075,0.000030791787,0.000010744751,0.9840438],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997738,0.000012737467,0.00017831635,0.00030186767,0.0015358478,0.00023320962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988497,0.000111131885,0.00004782585,0.00012820768,0.00068389485,0.00017925708],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017274024,0.00016662368,0.0002940202,0.000012769376,0.0005595626,0.000045198412,0.00021878134,0.0001437836,0.007480244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017751935,0.00015877005,0.00007302394,0.000031661773,0.00023469869,0.00002998629,0.00011958078,0.00014185069,0.00023163186],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021746496,0.0000023265627,0.000026864049,6.5239385e-7,0.00006313276,0.00003054329,0.00021789089,4.7072282e-7,0.0000010758089,0.7040982,0.29499954,0.0005570814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036790283,0.000004522314,0.00013792704,0.00005079861,0.000031837877,1.6863675e-7,0.00033029742,9.5280186e-8,0.0000016153564,0.03516236,0.9640278,0.0002157818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9945691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99963963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6690283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019811231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022455653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99342704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162154867","doi":"","title":"The Supreme Court in a Pluralistic World: Four Readings of a Reference","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Narrative; Legal pluralism; Pluralism (philosophy); Notice; Sociology; Legal realism; Legal research; Epistemology","score_opus":0.052601149057472034,"score_gpt":0.31238572306016793,"score_spread":0.2597845740026959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162154867","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6839657,0.017307304,0.0011281284,0.028689444,0.00092123245,0.00043613903,0.000009113482,0.00005335163,0.26748964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993095,0.0049639046,0.000013439668,0.00003415451,0.0001908591,0.0000038068315,2.4026153e-7,0.000002853379,0.0016957462],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980466,0.00018606707,0.00021795876,0.000082741775,0.0004287118,0.0010379306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932474,0.00018751729,0.0001541702,0.00005290054,0.00021058023,0.000070076494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038700162,0.00006455541,0.00012377242,0.000066797016,0.0006046495,0.000036801794,0.00028530165,0.000029542865,0.0000063899693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00095657026,0.000043969,0.00004191774,0.0003766087,0.0004149159,0.000106797386,0.000030204676,0.00074976304,0.000012400633],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034555756,0.000012709343,0.016407674,3.3271172e-7,0.000027477612,0.0000013423497,0.0013248305,0.00000658822,0.000005146436,0.9791902,0.00030731,0.0026818595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002670886,0.00006621209,0.003505334,0.000023017255,0.000015148868,0.000012354046,0.013916155,0.0000073614647,0.0000020452958,0.94132465,0.040791895,0.00006873463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018104747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3962834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37817866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086489855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00393435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9884338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163025946","doi":"10.1093/icon/moab041","title":"Ely in the world: The global legacy of Democracy and Distrust forty years on","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distrust; Constitutionalism; Democracy; Context (archaeology); Politics; Sketch; Political science; Subject (documents); Sociology; Law; History","score_opus":0.02208313572474602,"score_gpt":0.3365698722796519,"score_spread":0.3144867365549059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163025946","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32494435,0.0015782457,0.00044754575,0.084154084,0.00230246,0.00015648098,0.00013237362,0.0000069415714,0.5862775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976119,0.00014091792,0.00009320907,0.0016636932,0.00043840267,0.0000015450061,0.0000025958514,8.754544e-7,0.00004690708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852103,0.00013073818,0.00030835814,0.00007693278,0.00085938786,0.00010353473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988404,0.00042921002,0.00017787503,0.00004929416,0.00046843954,0.00003478237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005854157,0.000061522886,0.00011769368,0.00003937467,0.0003008722,0.000094850984,0.00035328305,0.000025770622,0.000072289324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034036516,0.000038725702,0.00009369795,0.00021858879,0.0026549916,0.00024971453,0.0000501398,0.00015543132,0.0000038671196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052415668,0.00007459821,0.015358549,6.588917e-7,0.00006974836,0.00011476007,0.00021089452,0.00006609725,0.000007711788,0.98253757,0.00038481006,0.0011221808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063209806,0.000030442514,0.12534669,0.00013961681,0.0000343887,0.00024651876,0.0020796033,0.000003227294,0.000044646957,0.49963573,0.3717141,0.000092928334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007479508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005882105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6726675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012431796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071526883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9782427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163237934","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0135","title":"The notwithstanding clause: Legislatures, courts, and the electorate","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Constitution; Charter; Legislature; Law; Supreme court; Constitutional law; Judicial review; Free Exercise Clause; Law and economics; First amendment; Sociology","score_opus":0.010382390662058916,"score_gpt":0.2284526592122968,"score_spread":0.21807026855023787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163237934","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015717708,0.056625985,0.00043188292,0.024206305,0.0007833481,0.00011093362,0.000008369392,0.000016258798,0.9020992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98484224,0.013591469,0.000061783925,0.000089732406,0.0001840835,1.9388937e-8,1.6937044e-7,0.0000010357124,0.0012294666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937624,0.00016768782,0.00005573473,0.000051515497,0.00022460357,0.00012420361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994782,0.00017529598,0.00007434914,0.00004182849,0.00018339965,0.000046912184],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051035493,0.00003702815,0.00008106763,0.0000024054286,0.005356508,0.00007857722,0.00014259141,0.000027604892,0.0001205827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006357114,0.00002341172,0.00004933006,0.000021403574,0.0014405489,0.00018033254,0.000052731633,0.000110572946,8.17736e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007106229,0.000004854705,0.0002549363,4.473755e-7,0.00006027975,0.000018264254,0.004240696,0.000001297154,0.000013256235,0.9921923,0.0021872798,0.0009552882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005296074,0.000010034371,0.0013852845,0.000017131166,0.000042479867,0.0000140661,0.028161472,0.0000035955802,0.000007828102,0.023860548,0.9459211,0.000046845136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08400747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5611285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96912456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012981366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017199379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99593836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163857638","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190075774.003.0001","title":"Introduction The Birth and Growth of Judicial Review: 1607–2020","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Judicial review; Supreme court; Political science; Legislation; Law; Certiorari; Judicial activism; Constitutional review; Separation of powers; Constitutionalism; Politics; Democracy; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.019182760212388798,"score_gpt":0.2565804292573535,"score_spread":0.23739766904496473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163857638","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000010323694,0.062336743,0.000010635491,0.053122792,0.0005567714,0.00020471604,0.000012262705,0.000018485598,0.88372725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006975127,0.4838437,0.0000424248,0.0025733677,0.008634522,0.000011860996,0.000016273692,0.000012057474,0.49789068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990453,0.00004029748,0.00022244887,0.00020864453,0.00037657627,0.00010674856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993759,0.00007477934,0.00013405003,0.00009126616,0.0002885693,0.000035431305],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035739824,0.00011554245,0.00030186394,0.000020311702,0.00047213977,0.00001572068,0.00011254863,0.00009100431,0.0019914408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024712592,0.000077873476,0.000096205644,0.0000673931,0.0011867598,0.000043461943,0.000090129855,0.0001511753,0.000029180357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002404067,0.0000034598065,0.000027475007,0.000046054585,0.000047876136,0.0000016310387,0.00013881568,1.1683313e-8,0.0000010711498,0.9106857,0.08615125,0.0028942453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026695858,0.000012367769,0.00009990461,0.00024153502,0.000084959465,0.0000019686117,0.00016490003,3.391348e-8,0.0000027340052,0.12032335,0.8789503,0.00009126547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025912605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032299703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79279906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031612333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023522746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99892086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164875351","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3711","title":"Section 24(2) in the Trial Courts: An Empirical Analysis of the Legal and Non-legal Determinants of Excluding Unconstitutionally Obtained Evidence in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Charter; Nova scotia; Law; Empirical evidence; Section (typography); Political science; Ideology; Criminal trial; Criminology; Psychology; Sociology; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.06963850624137194,"score_gpt":0.3425073395442349,"score_spread":0.27286883330286293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164875351","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98106945,0.00032420745,0.000043174365,0.0020698493,0.0005529293,0.00011870237,0.000010831713,0.000001451695,0.015809406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99933916,0.00016525056,0.0000417955,0.00021904029,0.00021739663,0.0000043528307,6.5303044e-7,0.000001606741,0.000010736203],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979386,0.0005544462,0.0004536558,0.00014410482,0.00071133644,0.00019787309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990216,0.0003909544,0.00022169128,0.000091115115,0.000218581,0.000056042456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014467394,0.000082829276,0.000293106,0.0000694768,0.0007332942,0.00006418668,0.00023787183,0.000049557955,0.000020670313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000558191,0.000054605367,0.000100297395,0.00081932213,0.00053983193,0.00034414013,0.00005202214,0.00026731935,6.840945e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000877227,0.00019994227,0.7738657,0.000009800591,0.00021175081,0.00019079975,0.0029961546,0.0017920235,0.00016876649,0.21869697,0.00008289376,0.000907947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042592487,0.00013373114,0.95870924,0.00041834085,0.0005253142,0.000115977404,0.019368757,0.0008487402,0.00012136725,0.013249679,0.0019924988,0.0002571157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9729466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99972636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20544729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003345085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004154287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73695266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165671465","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3853161","title":"Positive Charter Rights: When Can We Open the ‘Door?’","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.014992486225050719,"score_gpt":0.280954363664995,"score_spread":0.26596187743994426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165671465","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030183848,0.020908792,0.00077152596,0.4543406,0.001204407,0.0004402038,0.000021682888,0.000040820472,0.4920881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820634,0.005886369,0.000016669046,0.0012603116,0.0010340486,0.000008601775,0.0000020157333,0.0000044874587,0.009724106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978532,0.00026537603,0.00014412521,0.00014459147,0.00033844655,0.0012542232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994861,0.00008124798,0.00007458936,0.000080645965,0.00020819626,0.00006924949],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011790004,0.00008791653,0.0001312637,0.00001893188,0.0030304499,0.00026303565,0.000512935,0.000042775897,0.00025196426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006844288,0.00005647186,0.000086313485,0.00017137124,0.00033175581,0.00020742795,0.00012487583,0.0007907256,0.000057040503],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000104202945,0.000026605621,0.00025437752,1.8731728e-7,0.0001506047,0.000012037114,0.0048495764,4.0087858e-7,0.000017452558,0.9865758,0.0011941749,0.0069083553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016642001,0.00003325007,0.00031304872,0.000016674418,0.000028202461,0.00006751535,0.01702793,3.9288892e-7,0.00003567875,0.8143369,0.16789111,0.00008288655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014374615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25277382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95187956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069274404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052866777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167311908","doi":"","title":"The Magnetism of Moral Reasoning and the Principle of Proportionality in Comparative Constitutional Adjudication","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Adjudication; Constitutionality; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Politics; Law and economics; Constitution; Constitutional law; Normative; Rule of law; Sociology","score_opus":0.022918598634681674,"score_gpt":0.309985333843503,"score_spread":0.28706673520882137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3167311908","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9579042,0.010814656,0.002389664,0.014170708,0.00012345945,0.00034577848,0.0000075300763,0.000006199647,0.014237787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943275,0.005428661,0.000020760233,0.000011346288,0.0000704603,0.000008487558,2.852879e-7,7.4732344e-7,0.00013177693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873674,0.00023561095,0.00025840034,0.000067370805,0.000313501,0.00038836003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999228,0.0002932083,0.00023953729,0.000041370033,0.00017785844,0.000020028665],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032534658,0.000045572,0.00012219835,0.000021374095,0.0006504086,0.000009174379,0.00012696277,0.000023398257,0.000008952518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003644529,0.000020952706,0.000038907674,0.000120768535,0.0054406673,0.00009949552,0.000027564896,0.00021051579,9.447275e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009325764,0.000015811122,0.033028677,5.2781354e-7,0.000031545496,9.7363824e-8,0.00042459797,0.000002797662,0.000032522297,0.9641654,0.000005024251,0.0021997278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007348767,0.00003606848,0.08126141,0.000037535738,0.000012333524,0.000010816945,0.0024509234,0.000005735807,0.000027079903,0.91325855,0.0021267654,0.000037923044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000973972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007887592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05090689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021217803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024015193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99726593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167887312","doi":"","title":"Book Review - The Tenth Justice: Judicial Appointments, Marc Nadon, and the Supreme Court Act Reference, by Carissima Mathen and Michael Plaxton","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Appeal; Dissent; Statutory interpretation; Political question; Supreme Court Decisions; Majority opinion; Politics","score_opus":0.012885390712471837,"score_gpt":0.2753724618283115,"score_spread":0.26248707111583963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3167887312","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021011475,0.8849851,0.000078351055,0.09827602,0.0001928058,0.00031859838,0.000016660539,0.000015277374,0.01401607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13115603,0.8571429,0.0000049173527,0.008587776,0.00041624616,0.000015995996,0.0000066537623,0.000007176206,0.0026622824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976279,0.00040740854,0.00026107015,0.00019994186,0.00049177743,0.0010119069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928504,0.00021237959,0.00015406564,0.00010010146,0.0001628256,0.00008558898],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024006849,0.0001476743,0.00027117014,0.000017445158,0.0025759882,0.0001231034,0.00024527416,0.00006118476,0.00012466479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026409316,0.000082312574,0.00006769667,0.00015284486,0.001044645,0.00014895712,0.00010896407,0.0009686374,0.00000796259],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000101745914,0.00005040497,0.00040246078,0.000037219554,0.0004117186,0.000008420579,0.0014054606,2.547105e-7,0.000021833632,0.77536577,0.2100903,0.012104435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064418034,0.000051498646,0.0002665934,0.00016752353,0.0004483551,0.00014509413,0.006328476,0.0000034399072,0.0000032352336,0.11391588,0.87788856,0.00013717939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021457924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005731881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6677982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002697807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020513649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167951243","doi":"","title":"Section 1 Charter Analysis of Trinity Western University v. The Law Society of Upper Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; Adjudication; Political science; Supreme court; Jurisdiction; Sociology","score_opus":0.02281852912145022,"score_gpt":0.24493666717034543,"score_spread":0.22211813804889521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3167951243","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83756584,0.00006364063,0.00013712407,0.006754147,0.00014910613,0.000038306138,0.000038122984,0.0000068134727,0.15524693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980908,0.000077354714,0.000008407312,0.00028575156,0.000034236782,1.236549e-7,0.0000019597644,3.323259e-7,0.0015010262],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995925,0.00005703053,0.000058144706,0.000055711942,0.00017857434,0.000058070058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968857,0.000063423424,0.000033320975,0.000045000113,0.00015408245,0.000015586305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011199615,0.000023371362,0.00009273166,0.000005719971,0.00034491587,0.0000031820207,0.00005434521,0.000018747332,0.00020284268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008061473,0.00001728356,0.00010711033,0.00047667147,0.000292973,0.0000347778,0.000026827938,0.000028813209,2.9401852e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009593075,0.000058330323,0.48391122,0.0000047325975,0.00168115,0.0000014740367,0.006569788,0.000051698476,0.00015060573,0.5034086,0.0038675163,0.00028528288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012585022,0.0000068584845,0.682254,0.0000045137185,0.00056560495,1.1918691e-7,0.06355353,0.000022326407,0.0005519079,0.0005274924,0.25230995,0.00007779297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96036226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9953683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5028811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000061602404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039798248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2652849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168073923","doi":"","title":"Dance Me to the End of Law (Rules, Laws and the Dance of Diversity)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Dance; Beauty; Diversity (politics); Law; Aesthetics; Focus (optics); Sociology; Political science; Art; Visual arts","score_opus":0.02276691561186714,"score_gpt":0.2767466914468743,"score_spread":0.2539797758350072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168073923","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6397234,0.020116601,0.00082070235,0.057395678,0.0005315166,0.00039073994,0.000017336144,0.0000105453355,0.28099346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993787,0.0054581515,0.000009606749,0.00014898581,0.00019470601,0.0000012575198,5.635918e-8,0.0000012945915,0.00039897853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901485,0.00008562186,0.00010532328,0.00006656104,0.0002761486,0.00045146167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951303,0.00008553132,0.00017512921,0.00010878232,0.00008987124,0.000027643944],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017459055,0.00004671874,0.00012117557,0.000010929384,0.0036227005,0.000034897745,0.0005532999,0.00001965044,0.0000049109603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018224283,0.000025707195,0.000051461055,0.000041611853,0.0022107488,0.000113104725,0.0002187127,0.0002756049,0.0000023726711],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039499126,0.000008693966,0.002792886,7.0497185e-7,0.00005259096,2.5742455e-7,0.002166931,0.0000018493245,0.0000145182585,0.9922845,0.000028855862,0.0026087163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048604372,0.000051463594,0.007814608,0.000023846027,0.000041139498,0.000005993532,0.003948012,0.0000011891515,0.00004729523,0.9592266,0.02829609,0.000057712736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018906143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11639201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35406354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000083350555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004761508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99767447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168989791","doi":"10.1017/9781108539296.002","title":"The Constitutive Power of Law and Courts","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Power (physics); Political science; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.02573328580782259,"score_gpt":0.22982614295191187,"score_spread":0.20409285714408928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168989791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012147577,0.00058324076,0.000015871114,0.000067074434,0.00028242936,0.00021673691,0.00014211643,0.00002568183,0.99854535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0635032,0.00065067515,0.000009122778,0.0000899762,0.00013510395,2.988931e-7,0.0000019790598,0.000005281456,0.93560433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925935,0.00003674489,0.000099502606,0.0001853265,0.0002551345,0.0001639279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991827,0.00017369058,0.00013916515,0.0001263167,0.00030047237,0.00007763763],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015968236,0.00013127785,0.00019967918,0.000025158253,0.0015364635,0.000027437316,0.0002306109,0.00015298568,0.0000069337093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022990635,0.00011516705,0.000079427075,0.0000038317467,0.010552734,0.000046262037,0.00021651044,0.00013451462,0.000005959518],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036432477,0.0000023712082,0.0000019915171,0.0000033826136,0.0001117031,0.000018363558,0.00064929895,2.0365679e-8,0.0000011859363,0.9885443,0.010499017,0.0001319691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012323871,0.000024634617,0.000010551214,0.00006855391,0.00008761388,0.0000011548457,0.0005734519,1.3338548e-7,0.000016201031,0.002829308,0.9961344,0.00013076347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036957224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040026856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.985715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007477342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023744818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169942846","doi":"10.22091/csiw.2021.6676.2026","title":"The Exclusionary Rule in the Criminal Law of Muslim Countries and Common Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statute; Jurisprudence; Common law; Political science; Position (finance); Sharia; Criminal law; Islam; Civil law (Civil law); Sociology; Law and economics; Public law; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.22793505118456583,"score_gpt":0.5395878784240091,"score_spread":0.3116528272394433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169942846","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8206639,0.047903474,0.0000034842274,0.004721794,0.00033534344,0.00021985563,0.000028324126,0.0000073190386,0.12611648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97119415,0.027018007,0.000011676308,0.0015428788,0.0001383506,0.000014863801,0.0000019296763,0.000004953275,0.00007319131],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99786025,0.00056230073,0.00042056112,0.00016614964,0.0007530844,0.00023767215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99796104,0.0012605332,0.0002613246,0.00016393403,0.00028951996,0.00006363018],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021060784,0.000117551885,0.0003352621,0.000056590434,0.0022007923,0.00061412185,0.0012217413,0.000053922933,0.0006199816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018834267,0.000074491225,0.0000788616,0.00045070582,0.0021650412,0.00073543284,0.00070760644,0.00021536474,0.0000025046802],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013202368,0.00021305085,0.16342252,0.000034791952,0.000101263744,0.00008696398,0.011251552,0.000013188693,0.0009475397,0.81342393,0.0057077473,0.004665429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002696068,0.000007086548,0.49489883,0.0002615098,0.0000715939,0.000011845741,0.024075566,0.0000022434983,0.0008957267,0.32978663,0.14952683,0.00019253202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044573136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043199938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4836373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044094828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024523027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169950524","doi":"10.1111/hith.12212","title":"6. PROXIMATE CAUSATION IN LEGAL HISTORIOGRAPHY","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Theory","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Legal history; Historiography; Law; Legal realism; Variety (cybernetics); Causation; Legal formalism; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Empirical legal studies; History; Rhetoric; Legal research; Comparative law; Political science; Black letter law; Philosophy; Private law; Mathematics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.018300063730922515,"score_gpt":0.2410568732754194,"score_spread":0.22275680954449686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169950524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1047089,0.027950069,0.00007642383,0.00067713804,0.0010662753,0.000073269104,0.0000017675735,0.000040351977,0.8654058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955656,0.00045620857,0.000031536347,0.00024090911,0.00011050061,0.000009049543,0.0000014003185,0.0000016517965,0.003583121],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951667,0.0001364312,0.0000656509,0.000098983335,0.0000905916,0.00009166519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998405,0.00004380531,0.000019426632,0.000033693832,0.00003442331,0.000028170294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035098777,0.000036312693,0.00006359016,0.000043950728,0.00024842564,0.00000612734,0.000026041478,0.000029668008,0.00016561171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007341484,0.000038063972,0.00002378913,0.00009534487,0.00042199905,0.00009736317,0.000012559681,0.00005124391,0.0000070621923],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000102055255,0.000023291737,0.0020902685,0.0000025346271,0.0000044267267,0.000019855608,0.0049904236,2.1132234e-7,0.00006137252,0.99016184,0.0006892232,0.0019463758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077486875,0.0000043245823,0.005632853,0.0000092524615,0.000005326846,9.449091e-7,0.0014803885,2.9122e-7,0.000008269876,0.1407974,0.85192883,0.000054618697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015287686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044453726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89085674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022324696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019735149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24806222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170320986","doi":"","title":"Canada's First Act: The History and Role of the Interpretation Act","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Legislation; Statutory interpretation; Law; Political science; Statutory law; Interpretation (philosophy); Legislative history; Judicial interpretation; Parliament; Politics","score_opus":0.005602989789462042,"score_gpt":0.21561247832229305,"score_spread":0.210009488532831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170320986","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7072458,0.044652946,0.00020484424,0.056461763,0.0026720578,0.00031669694,0.000004898792,0.000017432101,0.18842353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975087,0.0013842757,9.658437e-7,0.0002396944,0.0003281781,0.0000011485954,5.703924e-8,0.0000016163451,0.00053538004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917364,0.00006559101,0.0000842053,0.000048229373,0.00022381789,0.00040448632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997108,0.00005717399,0.00008636589,0.00004107769,0.00008374691,0.00002084909],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005930842,0.000038998845,0.00005263457,0.000009503193,0.0009965076,0.0000096002605,0.00018072047,0.000018042672,0.000026113927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013082025,0.000021680635,0.000028977911,0.00005992779,0.0006224977,0.000054868127,0.00002720579,0.00028732073,0.0000010435685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030170353,0.000011289721,0.011699224,8.528276e-7,0.00009156685,1.6517973e-7,0.00849914,0.000002415784,0.000050283466,0.9482957,0.0028460405,0.028473144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012351735,0.00007138518,0.02926366,0.000027296795,0.000039389182,0.000015347034,0.016377917,0.000024356648,0.000029084096,0.28988928,0.6640575,0.0000812958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6237917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9920441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66121143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013268103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008599899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170514750","doi":"10.31078/consrev712","title":"The Implementation of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in Canada: Between Utopia and Reality","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Fundamental rights; Cultural rights; International human rights law; Linguistic rights; Rights of Nature; Utopia; Political science; Right to property; Social rights; Charter; Law; Reservation of rights; Jurisprudence; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.06773358781522724,"score_gpt":0.38336330997958884,"score_spread":0.3156297221643616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170514750","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.497791,0.29175532,0.00003312276,0.089053236,0.0006436418,0.0010040207,0.00049654034,0.00001611905,0.11920702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9682706,0.031436127,0.000008181842,0.00015112292,0.00009319752,0.000008908609,0.000011772838,3.26924e-7,0.000019768977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936384,0.00010226954,0.0002096999,0.00009506906,0.00013072485,0.000098379016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996586,0.00014171893,0.00006504491,0.000025268411,0.00007836709,0.00003102214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031312072,0.00004511967,0.00015436031,0.000005146381,0.00070615904,0.000013491692,0.00004134061,0.000014422454,0.000041868105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055112963,0.000032981006,0.000020730902,0.000059695398,0.0012416431,0.00006990558,0.000034973204,0.00004078293,9.308773e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.70819e-7,0.0000011189128,0.034955405,0.000023393268,0.000012965302,0.0000011992348,0.000066205284,4.2235712e-8,6.381062e-7,0.95558596,0.00068663305,0.008665868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012997468,0.0000018827241,0.25980157,0.00015312168,0.000027315367,0.000002204124,0.0007484321,1.935159e-7,0.000009202061,0.024185034,0.7148732,0.00006788938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.827488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9810562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93140095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023225341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029577021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5431276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170833626","doi":"","title":"The Challenge of Diversity in a Multinational Federation: the Impact of the Judiciary on Pluralism in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Political science; Law; Constitution; Nomination; Charter; Supreme court; Rhetoric; Judicial independence","score_opus":0.04712162325057034,"score_gpt":0.3015334131619888,"score_spread":0.25441178991141844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170833626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78623843,0.0005252634,7.8329117e-7,0.16929595,0.000115898976,0.00031628794,0.000029304128,0.0000049342802,0.04347314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991602,0.00024135204,0.0000011077171,0.00046426346,0.00010894794,0.000007841204,4.9952615e-7,0.0000019746285,0.000013870549],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988007,0.00024829112,0.00015488402,0.00014257037,0.00050365244,0.00014987902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992332,0.00044363266,0.000101899444,0.000075920616,0.00011645434,0.000028903196],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025866693,0.00008066026,0.00013122876,0.000018053312,0.0015610626,0.000020530037,0.00028987616,0.000026341702,0.000025948586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046897162,0.000041584364,0.00008660019,0.000253384,0.00046169784,0.000054855987,0.000117616124,0.00018374366,9.324859e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014530658,0.0001103791,0.04200413,0.0000014372634,0.000060367034,0.0000035203875,0.1475744,0.0014147839,0.000010186376,0.8071718,0.0011328842,0.00037077905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040217326,0.00006506816,0.872054,0.000033877328,0.0000043812374,1.152056e-7,0.104035884,0.00015098554,0.00001470833,0.022818146,0.00033432245,0.0000863587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9658987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96456593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8300499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006960498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008248494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3171376590","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3144327","title":"Let's Be Frank: Judicial Deference, Expats, and the Right to Vote","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Military College of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Judicial deference; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01197642459192169,"score_gpt":0.2721341356311738,"score_spread":0.2601577110392521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3171376590","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62564117,0.012069009,0.006850332,0.100336954,0.0017340101,0.00058992975,0.000008201849,0.00008527373,0.25268513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99118185,0.0038298813,0.000025014875,0.0014628846,0.0026979514,0.000007348063,2.730148e-7,0.00000466026,0.0007901491],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773735,0.00017379672,0.00017175653,0.00015158056,0.00042060894,0.0013449389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994736,0.00010777025,0.00007031488,0.00006705233,0.00017211793,0.00010917575],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021269412,0.000102802784,0.00016377741,0.000051974286,0.0031820848,0.00010496191,0.00028320786,0.000055437937,0.00004023865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002565928,0.000065477914,0.0000697325,0.00026241931,0.0015306193,0.00012625384,0.00006543085,0.00061262056,0.00004087973],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008685229,0.000010864802,0.0006913692,2.0951633e-7,0.00006187156,0.0000011054334,0.0026409386,2.441091e-7,0.000011033744,0.98346573,0.0009908676,0.01203894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053126446,0.00013634725,0.0011451201,0.000011469014,0.000037199625,0.000023291945,0.005356271,0.0000016546998,0.00001517558,0.79585344,0.19676778,0.00012101205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007547691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14651597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36554068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025457513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017280483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3171772895","doi":"10.1017/9781316823330","title":"Proportionality and Judicial Activism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Judicial activism; Supreme court; Judicial independence; Discretion; Judicial discretion; Constitutional law; Constitutional court; Judicial review; Constitution","score_opus":0.041910288089830425,"score_gpt":0.2613865396820902,"score_spread":0.21947625159225975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3171772895","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026612607,0.00022728503,0.000032638884,0.00019508025,0.0003681619,0.00033622317,0.00016516449,0.00008137383,0.998328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012690662,0.0003518983,0.000011402673,0.000049607384,0.00081345945,0.0000011520945,0.000019366484,0.000008252328,0.9860542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987959,0.00008182852,0.00010365362,0.0003509417,0.0004150191,0.0002526165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991535,0.00006444311,0.00023689457,0.00019476702,0.00019773988,0.00015263316],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022701961,0.00018351666,0.0002968072,0.00005605899,0.0026434471,0.000085020234,0.00035867255,0.0002817776,0.0000034563504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007595692,0.00021196931,0.000109056586,0.000005949685,0.0028302285,0.00013593289,0.00031829532,0.0002901606,0.0000075566722],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030656007,0.000008223014,0.000030138346,0.000013144583,0.000083896586,0.00007117804,0.00017275874,2.9289126e-8,0.0000012312556,0.9056131,0.09232765,0.0016479591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018555859,0.000012488845,0.0007163737,0.00007755606,0.00012602609,0.0000016138071,0.00012275894,3.7856603e-7,0.0000040764676,0.0008665026,0.9976431,0.00024357304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009682517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033518655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90531546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033709072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013850187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172430832","doi":"10.1017/s0008423921000354","title":"Between Populism and Juristocracy: The Republicanism of Rainer Knopff","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Skepticism; Political science; Law; Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Constitutional theory; Law and economics; Populism; Scholarship; Constitutional law; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.030687907149505526,"score_gpt":0.3098959499446334,"score_spread":0.27920804279512784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3172430832","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7638307,0.0010640965,0.00008468928,0.13677393,0.0005261867,0.000067075256,0.000027559918,0.0000036703234,0.097622074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99854034,0.000012739699,0.000110477995,0.00076269865,0.0004006657,3.4759654e-7,1.2221486e-7,0.0000013243553,0.00017128044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867964,0.00007769636,0.0002184671,0.00009498853,0.0004258846,0.000503304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980204,0.0001962328,0.0000788556,0.00007231844,0.00060315744,0.0010290112],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013392344,0.000045873334,0.00013611646,0.000079613324,0.0012272807,0.00009382656,0.00032109677,0.000029943427,0.00008120735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003506885,0.00003136819,0.000046206427,0.0005324278,0.005884377,0.00019170299,0.000034556866,0.00013405559,0.0000017469426],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.395576e-7,0.0000024896822,0.015073324,7.4936685e-7,0.000005143979,0.000019065908,0.0007650342,1.12222935e-7,0.000034081317,0.98261833,0.00042310986,0.0010582033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008731758,0.000030387659,0.68063384,0.00002883304,0.000025821737,0.000037130514,0.0041189436,7.3540804e-7,0.00015653865,0.24414434,0.07065909,0.000076993274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16116337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08821071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.738474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018396389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00903772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99682105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172672511","doi":"10.1093/icon/moab046","title":"Dialogue and distrust: John Hart Ely and the Canadian Charter","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Distrust; Context (archaeology); Law; Skepticism; Sociology; Judicial review; Politics; Political science; Epistemology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016983065412624468,"score_gpt":0.2754866363459421,"score_spread":0.25850357093331766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3172672511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03181727,0.006289805,0.000738862,0.22084966,0.0047863624,0.00017676369,0.00022762528,0.000014692075,0.73509896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99500394,0.0006549492,0.00011175377,0.0031134496,0.00094890106,0.0000025904494,0.0000063840375,0.0000015741971,0.00015648738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884456,0.00010379283,0.0002463721,0.000095836156,0.0005671465,0.00014231709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985343,0.00023977098,0.00011092035,0.00003608538,0.0009119749,0.0001669484],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005597767,0.00007378972,0.00014490953,0.000051010204,0.0010006296,0.0002276008,0.00017419833,0.00004964155,0.00015026801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042740515,0.000053314736,0.00007308186,0.00006548737,0.0066121686,0.0002685405,0.00005115316,0.00015999097,0.00000952205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041520063,0.000012067919,0.002822309,6.455699e-7,0.00013274705,0.00012423626,0.00041955253,0.000003683259,0.000008688062,0.9951359,0.00063247595,0.00066619134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00097123254,0.0000084093945,0.007737182,0.000049712016,0.00003878917,0.00048301532,0.00045535664,0.000005098818,0.00002167904,0.1761139,0.8140245,0.00009110729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052735846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.335025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9631866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014028042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018047574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99609125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3173481014","doi":"","title":"Chang's Parity: An Alternative Way to Challenge Balancing","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Intuition; Parity (physics); Premise; Human rights; Maximization; Epistemology; Positive economics; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Philosophy; Political science; Microeconomics; Physics","score_opus":0.03588919667236481,"score_gpt":0.32968836672647295,"score_spread":0.29379917005410816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3173481014","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7069388,0.006506855,0.0037372413,0.06542652,0.00193528,0.00039323547,0.000008031863,0.00009339664,0.21496066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889193,0.0076257596,0.000025881447,0.00016696365,0.0025229207,0.0000070246338,4.1076046e-7,0.0000060531006,0.000725667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764496,0.000090835274,0.00012536392,0.00017391509,0.0003990703,0.0015658793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993785,0.000023880653,0.00013182226,0.00014025197,0.00015447447,0.00017104493],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019064118,0.000096314405,0.00014640756,0.00004898043,0.004466332,0.00020817017,0.00057520013,0.000048935417,0.000037227503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029750122,0.00008541496,0.000062678686,0.000049710245,0.00024345345,0.00043297635,0.00008415547,0.0006462404,0.0000693094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014958848,0.00003892987,0.00119631,3.980612e-7,0.00006152043,0.0000061545816,0.006348231,0.0000032222201,0.000011603146,0.9414509,0.000042875185,0.050824914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028548294,0.00027367944,0.0059594186,0.00003022676,0.000020936137,0.000015629557,0.031603903,0.0000068938566,0.000012490897,0.9202441,0.04133284,0.00021442631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013107256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1779139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28198054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007238509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010855151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3173580499","doi":"10.1017/9781108283618.008","title":"Declarations, Injunctions and the Declaration Plus","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Declaration; Political science; Law; Negotiation; Human rights; Contempt; Mediation; Harm; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04340906735938081,"score_gpt":0.2313283309319595,"score_spread":0.1879192635725787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3173580499","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005062628,0.0014133846,0.0005941578,0.00057809165,0.00027263103,0.0003237045,0.000044988497,0.0000510611,0.9966714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006159762,0.0019897101,0.000028344362,0.00018334115,0.00029075806,0.0000020357757,0.00002366141,0.0000063853145,0.991316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917096,0.00009861962,0.00010779966,0.00022700572,0.00026033004,0.00013528312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929273,0.00016129049,0.000097713586,0.00014010118,0.00023621868,0.00007197151],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018518567,0.00013620243,0.00020862528,0.000050324612,0.0022582472,0.00009014931,0.00015705406,0.00018574142,0.000008049299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005206007,0.00012549953,0.00010926193,0.00001328488,0.0018690474,0.00008528686,0.00016756766,0.000236309,0.0000068995105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038248592,0.000002056494,0.0000018498587,0.0000032492612,0.00009000211,0.000015571793,0.00037582245,0.0000018976228,5.9176705e-7,0.9888684,0.010191156,0.00041116797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004346076,0.00000549848,0.000021020009,0.000038573115,0.00020273576,0.0000025145353,0.00087471626,0.000008087648,0.000002146701,0.0008772097,0.99738604,0.0001468772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041448055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011336168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98799115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019211876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005137523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99904066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174061900","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3841037","title":"How Constitutional Rights Matter: Thoughts on the New Gold Standard in Empirical Constitutional Studies","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional law; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.038103333762679374,"score_gpt":0.32839887397535816,"score_spread":0.2902955402126788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174061900","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.079210296,0.0524721,0.011123798,0.6721262,0.0042573153,0.0006861624,0.00006917881,0.00011095745,0.17994401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98480016,0.0052315146,0.000060225102,0.0015194103,0.0025073853,0.000010964674,0.0000034672023,0.000003823271,0.0058630765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964753,0.00039945528,0.00030221167,0.00029597222,0.00096571783,0.001561374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987701,0.00049666746,0.00012327958,0.000112793634,0.0003664366,0.00013068142],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016414844,0.00020070872,0.00031018094,0.00008956126,0.0020889458,0.00020462017,0.00028913212,0.000098425386,0.000107487016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063618587,0.0001331519,0.00016994146,0.00048500096,0.0046829595,0.00027284896,0.00007100143,0.0014052048,0.00009285463],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056613295,0.00005610989,0.004387174,0.0000010337516,0.0002181545,0.000051215662,0.00064591924,0.00002241206,0.000007724772,0.9789021,0.015172686,0.00047886936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043026355,0.000046419413,0.00040380974,0.000060082384,0.000024776144,0.00014145946,0.007827873,5.1365106e-7,0.000035751753,0.7061488,0.2847338,0.00014641133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020637854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022634031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9055898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020955435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016398694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175260927","doi":"10.38127/uqlj.v40i1.5643","title":"Judicial Activism and Constitutional (Mis) Interpretation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The University of Queensland Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Sheridan College","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Judicial activism; Law; Constitution; Interpretation (philosophy); Judicial interpretation; Judicial review; Doctrine; Political science; Separation of powers; Project commissioning; Politics; Publishing; Sociology; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.016461759099501122,"score_gpt":0.24189701933531674,"score_spread":0.22543526023581562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175260927","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19280407,0.0016308093,0.017870944,0.019905506,0.0005831582,0.00009189977,0.000019760657,0.000021482669,0.7670724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99902564,0.00046369116,0.000093659604,0.00012526193,0.00014554762,1.6825519e-8,7.5367717e-7,5.7849036e-7,0.00014483555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951243,0.0001235841,0.000054923163,0.000052539945,0.00017420876,0.000082301885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996174,0.000096574266,0.000056997862,0.000025462623,0.0001589949,0.000044547472],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002423016,0.00003390574,0.00007643807,0.000013540447,0.002091576,0.00002116569,0.00007182398,0.00002747742,0.00016704005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046528374,0.000028214872,0.00004070762,0.00006076545,0.004074814,0.00012513394,0.000027209084,0.000110470326,0.0000044121507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044654433,0.000013601786,0.0010042519,9.885338e-7,0.000046643312,0.000027521495,0.00522721,0.000010601426,0.000036327165,0.99090403,0.0004803525,0.0022038296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014164143,0.0000674095,0.01871121,0.00017246623,0.00022220415,0.00025784998,0.08623579,0.000056046272,0.00015902374,0.25601628,0.6364382,0.00024712575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024638206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006957862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8062216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032082702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023055001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99920756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176722936","doi":"","title":"The 2018 Toronto Municipal Election -- Judicial Failure to Protect the Structure of the Canadian Constitution","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Appeal; Constitution; Law; Political science; Legislation; Supreme court; Judicial review; Legitimacy; Democracy; Legislature; Constitutional review; Politics","score_opus":0.010233373989834649,"score_gpt":0.2557024748163947,"score_spread":0.24546910082656004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176722936","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34531552,0.00044414142,0.000023932787,0.05997203,0.0030602927,0.0027641507,0.000036494504,0.00004331234,0.58834016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982555,0.000015991807,0.000010363142,0.00063289213,0.0003366531,0.0000112832995,5.4983013e-7,0.0000018434679,0.0007349609],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897397,0.00014072096,0.00012593609,0.00011625027,0.00037512215,0.00026798467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994969,0.00007083503,0.000055064716,0.00016729752,0.00014641012,0.00006354309],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032574838,0.00007506777,0.00008497685,0.000011196318,0.0038803576,0.00006448632,0.0003774961,0.000075900934,0.0002084111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019734848,0.000033402684,0.00005941917,0.00024435445,0.0008783824,0.00009245123,0.000053951655,0.0001234974,0.000027697746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014371015,0.000003704705,0.0027645922,8.9982325e-7,0.000029393745,8.1082725e-8,0.003471983,0.000033051307,0.0005351743,0.98524183,0.006766783,0.001138111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012578341,0.000055632067,0.022544848,0.00002233575,0.000026497873,0.0000015456392,0.015381065,0.000009783849,0.0007495793,0.020501634,0.9404418,0.00013949575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9668259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9647402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004475647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010991875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99741644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3177363672","doi":"","title":"The Supreme Court in Canada's Constitutional Order","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitution; Law; Constitutionalism; Political science; Majority opinion; Constitutional court; Original jurisdiction; Constitutional law; Sociology; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.010186269359488328,"score_gpt":0.24524747835382033,"score_spread":0.235061208994332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3177363672","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2640875,0.026358882,0.010166941,0.43207955,0.0044190562,0.00061885756,0.000032309144,0.00006648231,0.26217043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884816,0.009859756,0.000004434459,0.00016745587,0.00037034886,0.0000048164598,1.8189608e-7,0.0000019702773,0.0011094298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976765,0.0001087632,0.0001730986,0.00009101775,0.0004655651,0.0014850615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994296,0.00024247824,0.00005894938,0.000045682722,0.0001607938,0.00006251324],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015022095,0.00006783608,0.000084207415,0.000023322682,0.0015588873,0.00002972486,0.00024238497,0.000026380669,0.000058498037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040138364,0.00003652936,0.00003202572,0.00017530275,0.0010089787,0.00010596806,0.000022879714,0.00040702446,0.000020714107],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013452395,0.000006172064,0.023435235,8.461428e-8,0.000029727022,0.0000032476466,0.000052178475,0.0000030301685,0.000007855382,0.9639907,0.0006511748,0.011807124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034410937,0.000015830614,0.006168362,0.000017491133,0.0000061445585,0.000032213633,0.0052051707,9.390819e-7,0.0000029973212,0.6781139,0.30999327,0.00009960513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81745213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7243941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045590396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05801206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3177830479","doi":"","title":"Stating it Simply: A Comparative Study of the Quantitative Readability of Apex Court Decisions from Canada, Australia, South Africa, the UK, and the USA","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Readability; Jurisdiction; Law; Order (exchange); Political science; Apex (geometry); High Court; Sociology; Business; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09269099111085734,"score_gpt":0.3529101016266257,"score_spread":0.2602191105157684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3177830479","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926176,0.0009414018,0.00011443203,0.0046352977,0.00008164964,0.0002472993,0.000046125228,0.0000011681382,0.0013150147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99941814,0.00025777527,0.000017065753,0.00005654445,0.000051108957,0.000005924928,4.2490484e-7,0.0000017105862,0.0001912871],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99731976,0.0010032527,0.00033521338,0.00013271853,0.0006773307,0.00053175003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967959,0.0022998475,0.00031867938,0.00012640205,0.0004229903,0.000036212437],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021159141,0.00008903433,0.00026113162,0.000010565249,0.0017055551,0.000032290627,0.0003143719,0.00002208869,0.00004271886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011776399,0.000042317228,0.00007253555,0.00031900205,0.0011928736,0.000047233563,0.00009737822,0.00066258863,6.829281e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022621907,0.00020676831,0.14370531,0.0000010578746,0.0010138146,0.000002539618,0.29207188,0.00022263422,0.00004823275,0.5612887,0.00069905404,0.00051378156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034469462,0.00007663912,0.078221865,0.000018839564,0.00011479836,0.0000022112208,0.72900146,0.000010802554,0.00002214738,0.19176337,0.00036652896,0.000056651752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8317307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9964525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43692955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003007835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052193347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3178442771","doi":"","title":"Between Populism and Juristocracy: The Republicanism of Rainer Knopff","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Skepticism; Political science; Law; Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Scholarship; Constitutional theory; Populism; Law and economics; Constitutional law; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.015315163812493609,"score_gpt":0.28366320875852025,"score_spread":0.26834804494602665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3178442771","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6815388,0.040853035,0.0012480165,0.15289372,0.00053018663,0.00022073876,0.000011694673,0.000043582564,0.12266023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909219,0.0061208718,0.00002269867,0.00017288471,0.00068001234,0.000001840199,9.3097884e-7,0.0000033760132,0.002075453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985105,0.00015709603,0.00017627908,0.00010135752,0.00030264183,0.00075216347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994816,0.000113218965,0.00010519908,0.00006605195,0.00018093661,0.00005300324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015794479,0.000060583225,0.00013553734,0.000024720923,0.001248219,0.000044666565,0.00015202418,0.000041350686,0.000032679207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033637896,0.000041818497,0.000066593006,0.00021260341,0.00046696328,0.0001017018,0.00005407662,0.0005783062,0.00000283608],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002944646,0.000010744418,0.006711424,5.907586e-7,0.00008515755,0.0000017030328,0.0009274614,1.9851294e-7,0.000028867844,0.97722685,0.00030249867,0.014701552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014833343,0.000031905674,0.01230834,0.000007868609,0.000040333995,0.000034260283,0.0078082657,2.2946122e-7,0.000018825922,0.878298,0.10123977,0.00006387634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00217268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007682247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30938312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018171847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003379192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96004176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3179491379","doi":"10.1017/s1352325221000094","title":"HYPERLEXIS AND THE RULE OF LAW","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rule of law; Law; Political science; State (computer science); Law and economics; Power (physics); Private law; Public law; Space (punctuation); Plan (archaeology); Sociology; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.017890170038501973,"score_gpt":0.27712352917389504,"score_spread":0.2592333591353931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3179491379","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036364965,0.0038813415,0.000027026601,0.0055528223,0.00012413991,0.00003337674,0.0000028346026,0.0000093415465,0.95400417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968199,0.00021062624,0.000027059668,0.0009878719,0.00011571136,0.000002641375,2.3412439e-7,9.277663e-7,0.0018350022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99958384,0.00014767176,0.00005064668,0.000050415358,0.00010212042,0.0000652984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996461,0.00023826555,0.000015469075,0.000039996266,0.000045309178,0.000014843172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040838585,0.000023960889,0.00006747817,0.000003332669,0.0003905811,0.000015960133,0.000049529506,0.000016035514,0.00009181224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014914319,0.000015260364,0.000029095187,0.00005356194,0.0019685484,0.00004419112,0.000038005484,0.00003562717,0.000007661637],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018809365,0.0000066972366,0.000056828136,8.697659e-7,0.000013296838,0.000002033175,0.0030704555,1.8041554e-7,0.000035780886,0.9947399,0.00003345117,0.0020217113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013111872,0.0000021809176,0.0002759394,0.0000056810336,0.000008893871,8.195648e-7,0.0028035578,1.9334811e-7,0.00020536497,0.7548296,0.24171457,0.000022107784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039648353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00095094164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96045494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000051048155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005917454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7253198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3181859479","doi":"","title":"Judicial Review in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duquesne Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.030351447576479083,"score_gpt":0.3277087244845792,"score_spread":0.29735727690810015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3181859479","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010972353,0.5971008,0.000004689271,0.01193667,0.0002369105,0.00036020516,0.0000032901705,0.000015389802,0.39023232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14053898,0.80798274,0.000028208253,0.051080994,0.00026307927,0.000020926003,0.000004265407,0.0000038328876,0.00007695184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985551,0.00012237113,0.00039009153,0.00015636759,0.00043380825,0.00034225368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995223,0.000099837605,0.00008145779,0.00010038867,0.00009493076,0.00010103791],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017074583,0.000093936826,0.00038621944,0.0000115794255,0.00027494493,0.0000061204346,0.00018224628,0.000024009598,0.00041875962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031007561,0.00008258626,0.00006306172,0.0004624795,0.00020349085,0.000076229204,0.00003478633,0.00011743156,0.000072531504],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013225747,0.000012088376,0.001051156,0.0007569147,0.0000072368684,0.00005109799,0.0000334872,2.8242845e-8,2.821744e-7,0.94697994,0.025412448,0.025693988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037859503,0.0000034319276,0.0013022942,0.01045163,0.000024611452,0.0000012493504,0.000032823755,2.0938327e-8,0.0000011745202,0.003226286,0.98481077,0.00010785486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.992648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99925244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9593983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000531516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012985808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45851243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3182126444","doi":"","title":"Novel Uses of the Charter Following Doré and Loyola","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Statutory law; Political science; Constitutionalism; Law; Duty; State (computer science); Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology; Democracy; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01577044749942499,"score_gpt":0.2756434168446741,"score_spread":0.2598729693452491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3182126444","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96916616,0.002959317,0.0011896152,0.005066581,0.00059992564,0.0000833549,0.0000020300195,0.000010667661,0.020922376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983406,0.0005927712,0.000012672397,0.00013328413,0.0005665183,7.740681e-7,4.835832e-8,0.0000022604536,0.000351048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989587,0.000039880895,0.00010013339,0.000063362546,0.00022425914,0.00061363436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997697,0.000032205815,0.00006232192,0.000038688224,0.00007024999,0.000026831796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008199039,0.000046725465,0.00007838121,0.000018367546,0.00087662076,0.00002292107,0.00014378906,0.000026616983,0.000010720987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000107788925,0.000029898418,0.000071526665,0.00011668517,0.0005251591,0.00009622148,0.00003518353,0.0002661059,0.0000036059039],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010257665,0.000024072035,0.019068198,5.6711133e-7,0.00011939525,2.4496964e-7,0.0023768386,1.6027336e-7,0.001372248,0.9707189,0.00010128223,0.0062078172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068455003,0.00021942482,0.034627587,0.000078376266,0.00010198299,0.0000626097,0.021880152,0.0000028194124,0.0004787714,0.8949705,0.046690248,0.00020299539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027691657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02773842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.075748436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000121973884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000988035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9900028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3183574380","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1422","title":"Substantive Equality and Jordan’s Principle: Challenges and Complexities","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Operationalization; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Individualism; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.13650249277374452,"score_gpt":0.39096221217906807,"score_spread":0.2544597194053235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3183574380","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7822143,0.017467247,0.000005306072,0.040029258,0.00012205465,0.000044988534,0.000015790036,0.000007643875,0.16009346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98480713,0.012828419,0.00003878789,0.0008275039,0.0014001589,5.1415554e-7,2.590035e-7,0.000002240603,0.000094980765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992158,0.00016208102,0.00017623964,0.00007671164,0.00021878422,0.00015039579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947613,0.000097698474,0.00011537554,0.000018270017,0.00021357545,0.00007892882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042576712,0.00006469516,0.00022554916,0.000026140042,0.0009977141,0.00006159947,0.000038855138,0.000053245156,0.0000066761754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010517615,0.000056817003,0.00004068384,0.000050208128,0.0013778282,0.00015498322,0.00005914106,0.00010297262,2.9855292e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012543935,0.000017752645,0.00021003178,0.000011408491,0.000045536985,0.000009289003,0.04015418,1.0139646e-8,0.000016190372,0.95552236,0.000026300511,0.003974408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042246663,0.000050615272,0.06173927,0.000034741326,0.00003680869,0.00002694839,0.06148249,1.7542217e-7,0.000021743637,0.7096852,0.16637553,0.00012398299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004921439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011720845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24583712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037986458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027398646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7673711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3183595221","doi":"10.47096/rdpc.v1i2.98","title":"A artificialidade da dicotomia entre teoria externa e teoria interna: a teoria externa é autossuficiente à solução de conflitos entre direitos fundamentais?","year":2021,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Direito Público Contemporâneo","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.04229182219110581,"score_gpt":0.3258737187484526,"score_spread":0.2835818965573468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3183595221","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7305418,0.06856186,0.0046977685,0.016239733,0.019617543,0.0053952727,0.002621259,0.0015320319,0.15079269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9600789,0.002001617,0.00010889312,0.0018448414,0.0063219247,0.00034792232,0.00016513391,0.00015626336,0.028974479],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866965,0.002203382,0.0027277106,0.0026429645,0.00247622,0.0032532387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99325323,0.0009824028,0.0015222385,0.001477271,0.0011273158,0.0016375469],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026309679,0.0016707608,0.0024401918,0.00041762218,0.0027784738,0.004054491,0.0020468242,0.0009216513,0.0025105558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002211816,0.001768341,0.0015351133,0.0018543728,0.0021080012,0.0008805181,0.0013308175,0.0014914661,0.0010483917],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019028023,0.0045361207,0.19326068,0.0012249852,0.0044148318,0.008383033,0.063322924,0.00003414525,0.05319325,0.56115115,0.055356763,0.05321931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031995692,0.00025118628,0.005474478,0.0028254832,0.0010117508,0.00017590131,0.022582699,0.00036821523,0.004829756,0.003146248,0.95377165,0.00236306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008887225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002815477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8984149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024840224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004821335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185928768","doi":"","title":"Vavilov's Rule of Law: A Diceyan Model and Its Implications","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Presumption; Supreme court; Political science; Precedent; Judicial review; Rule of law; Consistency (knowledge bases); Common law; Computer science","score_opus":0.03359421177747729,"score_gpt":0.29832075333925867,"score_spread":0.2647265415617814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185928768","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63158196,0.025381401,0.007711842,0.111681536,0.00011428512,0.00036314383,0.000033446715,0.00008061909,0.22305174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99348706,0.00579356,0.000028683686,0.0003969657,0.00018687324,0.0000029016276,4.4373473e-7,0.0000029713815,0.00010055195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990028,0.0000333327,0.00012724685,0.00008699678,0.00016184799,0.0005877423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996911,0.000024602576,0.00006843852,0.000025250927,0.000099056444,0.00009153657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035804565,0.000050879724,0.00009994136,0.000015057092,0.0006845922,0.000017532786,0.00012609342,0.000029659952,0.000009519394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000731846,0.000045961326,0.000042765543,0.000104780316,0.00018913807,0.00012265022,0.000029855797,0.0003269157,0.0000066578564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073211754,0.000012907444,0.00038293825,0.0000011911864,0.000032494194,1.367652e-7,0.0013893128,0.000031473362,0.00038325373,0.99649274,0.000027528335,0.0012386867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015515619,0.00005429323,0.00046387527,0.0000060381517,0.00002799237,0.0000064049664,0.0022369833,0.00012508078,0.000022924736,0.99386793,0.0029648328,0.00006850721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00069458457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037088678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36190507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011332364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013506064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52653986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186060564","doi":"10.26153/tsw/13841","title":"Judicial federalism : a comparative study of its origin, operation, and significance","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.08178576743050622,"score_gpt":0.3781206144540064,"score_spread":0.2963348470235002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186060564","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6028072,0.0011107381,0.000013271036,0.0008166439,0.00062276504,0.001283465,0.000014132859,0.000050998286,0.39328074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99689966,0.0003466591,0.000021209904,0.000089212954,0.00032548112,0.00006335694,0.000038869763,0.0000042822926,0.0022112662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877477,0.00011878918,0.00027288665,0.00026734686,0.00043889484,0.00012732206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993603,0.00007038987,0.00014385364,0.000039505638,0.00031829413,0.00006764291],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000120593235,0.0001430341,0.0003881101,0.00003882478,0.00094790215,0.00006276832,0.00011949473,0.00008695343,0.00016383592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000065706416,0.00012978213,0.000033403892,0.00017161551,0.00016508001,0.00010705271,0.000017479722,0.00012378416,0.000022961669],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001317201,0.00026154873,0.0012250101,0.000027661252,0.00021407395,0.000004880262,0.26840782,0.000005211113,0.00015669325,0.72608936,0.0030266917,0.0004493542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012243785,0.0007165967,0.02879826,0.00012284993,0.00031151576,2.3826573e-7,0.8845853,0.000029121431,0.00052391115,0.010501013,0.072398074,0.0007887452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01757268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14204921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71558833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034169447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045502136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9889694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3190134562","doi":"10.52907/slr.v3i1.105","title":"Contested Empowerment of Kenya’s Judiciary, 2010-2015: A Historical Institutional Analysis by James Thuo Gathii","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strathmore Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Women's and Gender Studies et Recherches Féministes","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Constitution; Principle of legality; Scholarship; Empowerment; Political science; Normative; Law; Sociology; Constitutional theory; Law and economics","score_opus":0.03346336629318181,"score_gpt":0.32944423271554846,"score_spread":0.29598086642236665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3190134562","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006174165,0.51189965,0.0005189344,0.038662564,0.0016609834,0.001339245,0.00029165405,0.00017069056,0.4392821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96289283,0.03316456,0.00013326826,0.0026017677,0.00048252786,0.000045225333,0.000045341174,0.0000058500646,0.0006286411],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785995,0.00018950808,0.00057989085,0.00032071353,0.0007345975,0.0003153055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988323,0.00008744355,0.00025179255,0.00020518972,0.0004705682,0.00015273027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007640578,0.00018108613,0.0006820063,0.000051947314,0.00080230314,0.00002197219,0.0002938731,0.000090385794,0.0005769678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022589047,0.00014983771,0.00033945078,0.0009486092,0.0021635492,0.00015515747,0.000061796934,0.00012999377,0.000068715955],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013159148,0.00017825425,0.0014528608,0.0000808064,0.00042411117,0.0000079141955,0.00039845574,3.0354798e-7,0.00004650009,0.8575212,0.13833122,0.0015452398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015034717,0.00008750277,0.0018605895,0.0005870037,0.0006946266,0.0000019889242,0.00010777929,0.0000016784762,0.000023972161,0.005537078,0.9907397,0.00020772246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038765512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013509941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9567186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003302888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049991277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96763545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3192522861","doi":"","title":"Dare to Diverge: Time for Administrative Law in Hong Kong to Stand on its Own Two Feet","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Tribunal; Economic Justice; Certainty; Political science; English law; Administrative law; Legal certainty","score_opus":0.029903719837592317,"score_gpt":0.3414944403667125,"score_spread":0.3115907205291202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3192522861","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8705433,0.0010450318,0.00030093815,0.013023494,0.00048197285,0.0010160201,0.000049651466,0.000028223238,0.11351138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99512833,0.00018346857,0.000021632271,0.0005003022,0.00037763495,0.000015271373,0.0000013249263,0.0000061564347,0.0037658706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794286,0.00007446868,0.00016724176,0.00019035705,0.0003496353,0.0012754104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995171,0.000110392844,0.000056627083,0.000051756597,0.00013718182,0.0001269855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010501986,0.00010783088,0.00017899799,0.000066244625,0.00066591223,0.00006670909,0.00021506182,0.0000401633,0.000088329005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015096359,0.00009373407,0.00006358227,0.00024638826,0.00006534769,0.00015151576,0.000037687056,0.00040354973,0.00027640891],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018544396,0.00004076284,0.0014296195,0.0000015437761,0.00004441034,0.0000023191267,0.0016151697,0.00008685422,0.00016959361,0.9943727,0.00033375426,0.0017177887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033974182,0.0048669972,0.010472831,0.00044592473,0.00006355263,0.000020228967,0.041316513,0.000019144542,0.000602493,0.7207773,0.21695144,0.0010661638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008855834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049565833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27359545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010677393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020933864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96777713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3193428852","doi":"10.1017/9781108966399.009","title":"The Minority Rights Implications of Irish Unification","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Irish; Unification; Minority rights; Political science; Law; Constitution; Population; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.038322237424768944,"score_gpt":0.24590274245083052,"score_spread":0.20758050502606157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3193428852","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008710196,0.00057053554,0.000058947786,0.00036123983,0.00017953353,0.00022939495,0.00015730778,0.00003472758,0.99832124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0209679,0.0007936881,0.000015018046,0.000017525032,0.00017721235,0.0000010225475,0.000023997593,0.0000031934696,0.97800046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991867,0.000060075818,0.00014025474,0.00021446838,0.0002477225,0.00015079536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987759,0.00017727468,0.00019854061,0.00026447856,0.0005145942,0.0000692048],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014105249,0.00011669141,0.00017503303,0.00003529831,0.0019050268,0.000030362386,0.00039609615,0.0001638729,0.000004174611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026244266,0.000110428155,0.00014218948,0.000016121143,0.0015181891,0.000043891097,0.00014107427,0.00016635201,0.000004629257],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007742689,0.0000059246427,0.0000113718315,0.000005016013,0.00007636668,0.0000041987664,0.00009367007,1.4074915e-7,0.000008461342,0.9715458,0.02750659,0.0007346752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066394256,0.0000053184135,0.00047540336,0.000030197934,0.00011657453,4.946431e-7,0.00021560238,2.5944746e-7,0.000027406742,0.0011926523,0.9977496,0.00012004768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077124084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000980954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9703532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016683548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003490569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99939436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194065245","doi":"","title":"Le droit de vote, la représentation effective et l’égalité des électeurs : de l’importance de prendre au sérieux un droit constitutionnel (The Right to Vote, Effective Representation, and Voters' Equality: On the Importance of Taking a Constitutional Right Seriously)","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Jurisprudence; Constitution; Res judicata; Deference; Humanities; Citizenship; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.009985500864290611,"score_gpt":0.28859091629392136,"score_spread":0.27860541542963074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194065245","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9163137,0.0037510674,0.045447495,0.012918812,0.00048801626,0.0014720154,0.000046974084,0.00003687002,0.019525057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99662507,0.0012353742,0.00014251757,0.0009752385,0.00041129018,0.00012962747,0.0000074363647,0.000015873287,0.00045757947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99421304,0.002191008,0.00062574656,0.0005430849,0.00067570305,0.0017513986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962162,0.0021138291,0.0007931149,0.0002501911,0.0004286067,0.00019805592],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072449995,0.00033307605,0.0004535453,0.00010639945,0.0025421763,0.00014884325,0.00040997085,0.00020698315,0.000019664154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018318956,0.000268818,0.00024311559,0.0008811861,0.0050516794,0.00052068545,0.0000938053,0.001494251,0.00000797462],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021547335,0.00012932597,0.23097903,0.000022410382,0.0005216851,0.000019325562,0.006945175,0.0009636768,0.00033625762,0.7575887,0.000051757637,0.0022272128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00094583275,0.00032756757,0.152873,0.00038558294,0.00021075245,0.00084275525,0.008048551,0.00011310195,0.0009478789,0.8340497,0.0009366692,0.000318597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01720658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09913219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08192561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003219132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008950089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195243318","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2021.1953742","title":"Anatomy of an election – Canada’s Federal General Election of 2019 through the lens of political law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federal election; Law; Politics; Political science; Election law; Democracy","score_opus":0.02199072710997826,"score_gpt":0.31044438128734436,"score_spread":0.2884536541773661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195243318","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30479077,0.0010245626,0.00008147667,0.07890421,0.0007099965,0.00030610175,0.00008113146,0.000029409632,0.6140724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975252,0.00008721887,0.000109736335,0.001886762,0.0002099585,0.000004919318,0.00001184156,0.0000042898773,0.00016005122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852,0.00033956335,0.00031384727,0.0001353315,0.00039420513,0.00029704356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917865,0.00013512895,0.00014349219,0.0001265971,0.000357255,0.000058874135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027490902,0.000078494544,0.00023425,0.000009552105,0.00079725607,0.000010716647,0.00013691011,0.00006255679,0.00014092369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006946768,0.00006565542,0.000061128056,0.00017928919,0.0008672831,0.0000478538,0.00004173959,0.00012887512,0.0000015068737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022260454,0.00007348448,0.0004893944,0.000011332493,0.00002335802,0.0000010306059,0.00032484045,0.000010060092,0.00013806869,0.9942557,0.0045367456,0.00011371852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032974986,0.0001484714,0.009287554,0.000034071993,0.000034793367,0.000005379296,0.0029970729,0.000008119118,0.007966733,0.04031726,0.93872094,0.00014985532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98839253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98641914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9539384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016124001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001311885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.613193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195938815","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192893765.003.0007","title":"The Abusive Borrowing of Political Constitutionalism and Weak-Form Judicial Review","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Politics; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Criminology; Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.03425727321717925,"score_gpt":0.3063473867145365,"score_spread":0.27209011349735723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195938815","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000003805688,0.08660922,0.000018060999,0.013629931,0.00037692508,0.00022704445,0.000038603273,0.000016638398,0.8990798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.049156483,0.5219884,0.00013712097,0.008749279,0.0031801513,0.000038354894,0.000053790427,0.000025199733,0.41667125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857515,0.00003437529,0.00035116862,0.00020286175,0.0005658345,0.00027058844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987979,0.00042600717,0.00012514417,0.00009974473,0.0004423262,0.000108858156],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043137564,0.00015537212,0.00039705486,0.000024000177,0.0012780245,0.00003233902,0.00014789731,0.00015023432,0.0005464337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045683645,0.00010945238,0.00016035256,0.000044150547,0.0045588072,0.00005900295,0.00013405459,0.00019051759,0.000021778214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022304023,0.0000035563128,0.000013775912,0.000040543808,0.00007573425,0.0000063622397,0.00006550029,1.0369441e-8,3.9190314e-7,0.9937567,0.0044648,0.0015703948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041151277,0.0000062604777,0.000041147927,0.001185535,0.00010286582,0.0000044190897,0.00040481615,6.0245796e-8,0.0000010456408,0.30225015,0.6958524,0.00011015553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034689992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044202134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69150656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000094160685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011707938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196550758","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3732904","title":"Dialogue and Distrust: John Hart Ely and the Canadian Charter","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Distrust; Charter; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.013748823575536737,"score_gpt":0.23212648603651795,"score_spread":0.21837766246098123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196550758","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2617798,0.02374255,0.00029751103,0.61888915,0.0004626735,0.0004095518,0.00002176173,0.000039880033,0.09435713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904532,0.0068704807,0.0000024988763,0.0018214304,0.0006979748,0.0000028402558,6.081332e-7,0.0000026923396,0.00014827964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987099,0.00008834613,0.000090122885,0.000093474555,0.00016453654,0.0008536119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996656,0.000043455195,0.000034846464,0.000023411229,0.000038812937,0.00019382722],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079411484,0.00006251636,0.00010166649,0.000015761518,0.0021375762,0.00012209616,0.0001054926,0.000034774934,0.000020775813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014727555,0.000041056646,0.00003199309,0.00008837298,0.00080382335,0.00009541293,0.000021140782,0.0005371863,0.000012033504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019392573,0.0000016924423,0.0041174726,4.4924116e-7,0.000042520544,0.0000022292206,0.0032689453,1.6149444e-7,0.0000015555145,0.98689955,0.00028075502,0.0053652553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008848609,0.000076809345,0.011797125,0.000008000224,0.00005405137,0.000055907003,0.01191204,0.000014880091,0.0000012164696,0.7611626,0.21387208,0.00016044572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21120411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91104084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7286734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022051056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00235226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196893986","doi":"10.3390/laws10030072","title":"An American Notwithstanding Clause? Between Potestas and Potentia","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Context (archaeology); Constitution; Presidential system; Establishment Clause; Sovereignty; Power (physics); Law and economics; Politics; Sociology; History; First amendment","score_opus":0.031020929596060034,"score_gpt":0.33103534425600234,"score_spread":0.30001441465994233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196893986","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92041516,0.00048764364,0.00046738095,0.0037963544,0.00013290971,0.00005426067,0.000018903243,0.00006620308,0.07456118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99868065,0.00017115698,0.00038932727,0.00026242243,0.00033085234,0.0000014982035,0.000004423931,0.0000027741562,0.00015691029],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938977,0.00006778676,0.00007008363,0.00013999888,0.00016737521,0.00016497607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997145,0.000056848236,0.000028039252,0.000056272547,0.000054516255,0.00008985163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012877859,0.000048420214,0.00010690383,0.000013047084,0.00070447085,0.00006645028,0.000058265643,0.000021745376,0.000050793245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000062483676,0.00004638066,0.000020004949,0.0001989263,0.00055697083,0.00010371493,0.00003261935,0.000052091782,0.000011093894],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046378664,0.000028552236,0.48826924,0.0000022673748,0.00004727657,0.00003857423,0.0035388193,0.0000012522601,0.00043416827,0.4700511,0.00026956658,0.037314527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022634507,0.00007379148,0.66793907,0.000029488918,0.00008127044,0.000003124419,0.020424504,0.0000041922026,0.00030469545,0.05743617,0.2531565,0.0003208333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065420093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075083408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41261494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002697954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000086083666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98896044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197590264","doi":"10.1093/he/9780191926440.003.0062","title":"Re Resolution to Amend the Constitution of Canada [1981] 1 SCR 753, also known as the Patriation Reference, Supreme Court of Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03367796961031942,"score_gpt":0.22463165853119985,"score_spread":0.19095368892088044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197590264","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000580999,0.00026505042,0.000040606115,0.0018075616,0.000377644,0.00045759015,0.00045963516,0.000010591922,0.99600035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41590843,0.00079592783,0.00002326794,0.00025779562,0.00019585193,0.0000024219132,0.000045840094,0.0000073516157,0.58276314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829984,0.00012617938,0.00023907723,0.00023367735,0.0008590712,0.00024217552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848574,0.00020913292,0.00033098125,0.00023817654,0.00064180314,0.0000941424],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003130273,0.00016625797,0.0002869868,0.000042782696,0.0014090948,0.000018340386,0.00043396352,0.00014738711,0.00006676314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009970901,0.00013429459,0.00007808572,0.000042305608,0.0008434706,0.00005146668,0.00016947571,0.00022952448,1.3909846e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006738385,0.0000038607745,0.000014195163,0.000011161457,0.00012010444,0.000012150151,0.0007265486,0.00009038281,0.000006494046,0.9813998,0.01705898,0.0004889581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012259073,0.000021786704,0.00008531917,0.00014212838,0.00013035128,5.2623534e-7,0.0033727223,0.0000047217395,0.000040921634,0.0023116393,0.99362016,0.00014713382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98887885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9790881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008111469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0094447285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197616992","doi":"10.1111/capa.12431","title":"Protecting privacy? Government and parliamentary responsiveness to the privacy commissioner of Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; House of Commons; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Political science; Commons; Law; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.030304108855482507,"score_gpt":0.27031459117077034,"score_spread":0.24001048231528782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197616992","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49839073,0.00016483745,0.000080189646,0.48891982,0.0002277314,0.00037291014,0.00009101819,0.0000063094494,0.0117464475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979443,0.000009421274,0.0000730452,0.0013416173,0.00009909804,0.000027846741,0.0000055216883,0.0000022485842,0.00049688714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990573,0.0001432332,0.00012763092,0.0001215794,0.00035358846,0.00019668779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931204,0.00009639202,0.00004753669,0.0000973512,0.00014553526,0.0003011434],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003412029,0.000051979,0.00007187926,0.000014336054,0.0013009793,0.0000648592,0.00011253778,0.000026679198,0.00008137313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013905412,0.000044431807,0.000012668161,0.00022048377,0.00011018062,0.00008340112,0.000038385304,0.00006672721,6.6712585e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006481354,0.00006570598,0.044762567,0.000028368207,0.000120701225,0.00012767872,0.009188562,0.0000045723195,0.00047265782,0.83997303,0.055254735,0.049936615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052618474,0.000019270321,0.018339401,0.000017723823,0.0000052489713,0.0000032513242,0.0137349935,0.0000028933541,0.00045320473,0.00063794514,0.96666396,0.00006947772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8479725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99935514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91140926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005759274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013884716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197624574","doi":"","title":"The Good, the Bad and the Ugly:","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Statutory law; Appeal; Confusion; Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; Refugee; Immigration; Standard of review; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Psychology","score_opus":0.041277510750622096,"score_gpt":0.27882771498471887,"score_spread":0.23755020423409678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197624574","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000059560618,0.25465915,5.268094e-7,0.62112826,0.000080095546,0.00038704064,0.0000048580246,0.0000061090595,0.123674415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5869306,0.30935276,0.0000013022902,0.10233713,0.0005792253,0.00006192726,5.50891e-7,0.000004124285,0.00073238416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989927,0.00040524435,0.000109071705,0.00008376948,0.00019277059,0.00021647483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924415,0.00039879218,0.00003937749,0.00013555435,0.0000437336,0.00013840084],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014381326,0.00006381798,0.00012308426,0.0000026615137,0.0052312086,0.000099847515,0.000496738,0.000016852322,0.00010071943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007386441,0.000021261707,0.000064704785,0.0002131838,0.0021447407,0.000026583328,0.000047816196,0.00013792141,0.00017216033],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013276352,3.0015713e-7,0.00006215679,0.0000070198785,0.000018123123,8.1523257e-7,0.0014077653,7.2147266e-8,2.7646212e-8,0.9466449,0.034539785,0.01731773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004314298,0.0000028022328,0.0005953247,0.00007364727,0.000048782444,9.50394e-7,0.0007776663,0.0000015360026,5.191299e-8,0.011920573,0.9864976,0.00003796413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3545604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82867664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95195776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047416503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005307769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199035267","doi":"","title":"Purposive Interpretation: Loyola and the Forgotten Orphan of Canadian Constitutionalism","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutionalism; CLARITY; Constitution; Law; Political science; Consistency (knowledge bases); Philosophy; Democracy; Computer science; Politics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.00829903629806695,"score_gpt":0.241052521410157,"score_spread":0.23275348511209007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199035267","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18948083,0.03802384,0.015788587,0.37766463,0.0018036312,0.0019856151,0.00006890417,0.000052684863,0.37513128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896549,0.009297671,0.000010556515,0.0002534524,0.00022574098,0.000013143876,3.0151827e-7,0.000001986632,0.0005422607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877435,0.00011509472,0.00014905128,0.000074806456,0.00020307643,0.00068364514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994355,0.00017391017,0.00008905441,0.000037984584,0.0001802562,0.00008330462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013131718,0.000057772508,0.00010897,0.00010824733,0.00090654695,0.000024269713,0.0001537475,0.000035409113,0.00003796706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002946286,0.000030486759,0.00005510983,0.00018617357,0.0019517833,0.00014654391,0.000017478023,0.00020736654,0.000008720491],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037347763,0.000003073178,0.0015896169,3.239318e-7,0.000080537524,8.8996677e-7,0.0009945956,3.8231616e-7,0.000014156185,0.9857937,0.00010181588,0.011383538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068584137,0.000031687745,0.0008923085,0.00003241846,0.000032299093,0.00005815348,0.0049255905,0.0000010185499,0.000010048719,0.9289271,0.06433911,0.00006440689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1282817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71152735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80017406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042479674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052673947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9344132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W319908803","doi":"","title":"A Bill of Rights Odyssey for Australia: The Sirens are Calling","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bill of rights; Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Common law; Law and economics; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.050234584415605556,"score_gpt":0.3289777619148671,"score_spread":0.27874317749926153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W319908803","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95464206,0.013427863,0.0038443473,0.016195234,0.0014443785,0.0005260401,0.000016200933,0.000035574707,0.009868276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971341,0.00083992013,0.000026502239,0.00004031778,0.0012828808,0.000006805822,3.822567e-7,0.0000028613103,0.0006662109],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813837,0.000067238645,0.00016050266,0.000060285558,0.00024372397,0.0013298735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994804,0.00013191739,0.00014584162,0.000044338172,0.00013814206,0.00005931656],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016723744,0.00006663493,0.000119540404,0.000025601681,0.0013262994,0.000017572254,0.00018062396,0.000046451023,0.00001915245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012398452,0.000035568908,0.0001153652,0.00012413131,0.0002959123,0.00012724292,0.000013650973,0.00039444165,0.000008587449],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013745128,0.000033228807,0.0065197735,8.208891e-7,0.00009341939,1.5104793e-7,0.0013564114,0.0000050378026,0.000027985901,0.9911913,0.00031428706,0.0004438345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017794466,0.000053779262,0.0026534405,0.000018513598,0.000060860573,0.00001232637,0.009398169,0.0000013223878,0.00005487576,0.9292804,0.058201827,0.00008656693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01032547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038307767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06191093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027944945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006435044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199705558","doi":"","title":"Judgments v Reasons in Federal Court Refugee Claim Judicial Reviews: A Bad Precedent?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Law; Publishing; Court of record; Political science; High Court; Supreme court; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.022302405661758132,"score_gpt":0.31526177564236213,"score_spread":0.292959369980604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199705558","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4605918,0.16127259,0.0015982948,0.060187712,0.0038265283,0.0011145552,0.000017620336,0.00014826564,0.31124264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9103575,0.08496715,0.00006070196,0.0005384381,0.0012150586,0.000020172425,0.0000042234583,0.000009646043,0.0028271596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962095,0.0004989157,0.0004179132,0.00026132306,0.0005735086,0.002038816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993711,0.000062132814,0.0001653847,0.00009812944,0.00017398078,0.00012923992],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002880526,0.00015540647,0.00033594147,0.00007385672,0.0014206779,0.00012101501,0.0002616327,0.00010700965,0.00015419074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006653974,0.00014744545,0.0001755226,0.00049100595,0.00023053933,0.0002538107,0.00007029212,0.0013046874,0.00010448879],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055997276,0.00020622673,0.03446666,0.0000038326957,0.00013951088,0.00004937601,0.0013336395,0.0000042065853,0.00006167091,0.9324641,0.0030908443,0.028123908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008937675,0.00008305162,0.0086589195,0.0002462703,0.000045673165,0.00013732961,0.007585886,0.0000020103193,0.000015563459,0.6488623,0.33313778,0.00033147386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028866173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21037728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44976565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019051956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005965781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200126117","doi":"10.21991/cf29429","title":"Checking the Other and Checking the Self: Role Morality and the Separation of Powers","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Impartiality; Separation of powers; Rule of law; Power (physics); Law; Democracy; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Legislature; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.019758544782407333,"score_gpt":0.2911096224306319,"score_spread":0.2713510776482245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200126117","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07961422,0.0335385,0.010764162,0.3149829,0.0025765998,0.0022772853,0.00026848933,0.00024298069,0.5557349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965854,0.00072603114,0.00013681558,0.002068264,0.0002186266,0.000067479414,0.00000938487,0.000004541229,0.00018344069],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779737,0.00036293318,0.00044656443,0.00034387366,0.00060692924,0.0004423253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826765,0.0007150508,0.00023017274,0.00025212127,0.000447421,0.000087591274],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015180449,0.00021590065,0.0003020074,0.00004364761,0.0060609933,0.00019555909,0.00029025372,0.00012233887,0.000065615925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008478321,0.00012325335,0.00016195467,0.00044038403,0.0238166,0.00038584266,0.00027540262,0.0002733037,0.0000108887125],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047256017,0.00003643585,0.013810682,0.0000064988744,0.00014735502,0.000002672308,0.0016892127,0.000103733415,0.00007605113,0.98266083,0.00042576622,0.0009935292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002351945,0.000024692352,0.009572145,0.00018590764,0.0003314054,0.00017169588,0.058037825,0.0006968098,0.0004274031,0.21602295,0.71169776,0.0004794816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023955198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003784125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9169712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010292681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015879091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201007371","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3478650","title":"L'ingéniere para-constitutionnelle : modifier la Constitution par la bande et par contrat (Para-Constitutional Engineering: Amending the Canadian Constitution Indirectly and by Contract)","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011517978163141908,"score_gpt":0.24348551883578481,"score_spread":0.2319675406726429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201007371","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23100722,0.1392525,0.026961477,0.059548732,0.007963183,0.0028627266,0.00070335524,0.00025245245,0.53144836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9803425,0.017087834,0.000062079926,0.00072266423,0.000637177,0.000045162247,0.00004125909,0.000015197756,0.0010461187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937607,0.0008615468,0.00076146075,0.0006273363,0.0008410485,0.0031478826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975495,0.0009503116,0.00041423895,0.00020640803,0.00030743962,0.0005721553],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054603736,0.0006044137,0.00065582304,0.00023573164,0.0046777856,0.0006529271,0.00045270205,0.0006416864,0.00021717921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049732917,0.0005320626,0.00026701714,0.00053028495,0.010961114,0.0011440619,0.00006941356,0.003532137,0.00017446194],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064202046,0.000097540804,0.0090894615,0.000015522884,0.00064022595,0.000041328647,0.0007803149,0.00095094513,0.00035695298,0.98492765,0.0010793654,0.0019565045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030465473,0.00020550158,0.0036704438,0.00056899607,0.000572592,0.0032807172,0.0039874017,0.00066652446,0.000119245124,0.14160039,0.84104955,0.0012321073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.102147155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23790193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8433272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031750386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025199147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201552816","doi":"","title":"Standing in the Way: Comparing Constraints on Access to Justice after the Liberalization of Public Interest Standing in Canada and Israel","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Doctrine; Political science","score_opus":0.08791646586939315,"score_gpt":0.3370943018105437,"score_spread":0.2491778359411505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201552816","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98395467,0.0003627786,0.00032950263,0.009251003,0.00016185349,0.00012552083,0.0000023100013,0.0000016399941,0.005810743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989922,0.00063116715,0.0000015257831,0.0002608384,0.00009806814,0.0000051547268,1.7997267e-7,0.0000022222912,0.00000865213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868494,0.00015437175,0.00017190413,0.000084553554,0.0002703173,0.0006339148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995821,0.00014393133,0.00012178107,0.00006751,0.000049769227,0.00003490485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002051473,0.000061378196,0.00010965251,0.000058435104,0.0010202749,0.00028249776,0.00041142444,0.000017757284,0.0000069943594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038577142,0.000038832313,0.000015168141,0.00012810946,0.00027612658,0.00027364457,0.00007083105,0.0004428408,3.0252932e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034412253,0.000009656382,0.35127106,0.0000023007738,0.000016104328,0.000003960575,0.0021708247,0.00001792207,0.0000032204432,0.64064825,0.000017984048,0.0058042733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052643433,0.00006170342,0.77420425,0.00025171821,0.000028704228,0.000018720497,0.108853236,0.000047201815,0.0000060049197,0.11502122,0.00082723255,0.00015359446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.57572204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9977334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.525627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013212358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022714504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7847233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201581927","doi":"10.21991/cf29427","title":"Are There “Sources of Resilience” When the Separation of Powers Breaks Down?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Separation of powers; Legislature; Presidential system; Politics; Political science; Independence (probability theory); Power (physics); Law and economics; Executive branch; Law; Sociology; Mathematics; Statistics; Physics","score_opus":0.02237820668620567,"score_gpt":0.28957387556443787,"score_spread":0.2671956688782322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201581927","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10942207,0.016932942,0.02387152,0.041231573,0.0032259228,0.0012122474,0.0008915054,0.00019049122,0.8030217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99761045,0.00039267333,0.0002790725,0.000712495,0.00017842895,0.000041483418,0.000031120446,0.0000052420364,0.00074901606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99702215,0.00024879046,0.00073566614,0.00041699156,0.0010282216,0.00054819265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971129,0.00045990976,0.0006509268,0.0003443068,0.0012914654,0.00014050705],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065082643,0.00025394364,0.00046201353,0.00012648305,0.0025983513,0.00006576475,0.0004941301,0.00019823802,0.0004802688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014245579,0.0002031073,0.000329506,0.00069691817,0.018993584,0.0004883615,0.00020289267,0.0002332771,0.000050299794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050374216,0.00013416546,0.065156855,0.000015359183,0.00013709479,0.000031796037,0.00052537856,0.00067070656,0.00026527097,0.9287449,0.00354289,0.0007251849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017610329,0.00009432335,0.022401875,0.00081681076,0.00031611836,0.00023209833,0.097135864,0.00008770157,0.0050411834,0.2593459,0.61186886,0.0008982245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015636561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060121045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8881884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015885025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033418918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99870014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202974874","doi":"","title":"Notwithstanding Rights, Review, or Remedy? On the Notwithstanding Clause and the Operation of Legislation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Law; Constitution; Charter; Legislature; Fundamental rights; Judicial review; Law and economics; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.04633938444340602,"score_gpt":0.2737749389268172,"score_spread":0.22743555448341118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202974874","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013290626,0.00015246034,0.0008247011,0.012166087,0.00023760379,0.0009152162,0.000016824168,0.000047676313,0.9723488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7327629,0.26659742,0.000058944817,0.00037906773,0.0000974528,0.0000020871803,0.000002897134,0.0000032467362,0.000096025804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873513,0.0004354547,0.00014278495,0.00018944762,0.00034202912,0.00015514641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989978,0.00051835715,0.00011669103,0.00013911446,0.00020106482,0.000026972699],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007067761,0.000097104494,0.00018624969,0.00046610224,0.0015325868,0.000049852635,0.00016105773,0.000046249705,0.000055846725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005183086,0.000053678104,0.00006447456,0.0028500976,0.00064885576,0.00024193538,0.0000833766,0.00012765535,0.0000033294873],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023372086,0.000032736585,0.00027759073,0.000026656578,0.000073492345,0.000025697384,0.014113827,0.0000067913033,0.000006385659,0.98287827,0.00040418893,0.0019206645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057964557,0.000031562395,0.00007584881,0.0004389483,0.000108185995,0.000002102478,0.0052684774,0.000039603317,0.00014436695,0.00012218794,0.99308825,0.00010085053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044722043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09384375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.992684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015259847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046343345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203351226","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0088","title":"The judicial review of legality","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Principle of legality; Law; Political science; Judicial activism; Judicial independence; Judicial restraint; Jurisprudence; Legislation; Administrative law; Legitimacy; Ultra vires; Legislature; Judicial discretion; Supreme court; Politics","score_opus":0.01895730970178488,"score_gpt":0.26709398360848474,"score_spread":0.24813667390669986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203351226","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001058206,0.09648247,0.00007014891,0.007198851,0.00033740056,0.000039879105,0.0000064591463,0.0000042330594,0.89480233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7361799,0.2622543,0.00017742111,0.00028833913,0.0002768877,2.29175e-8,5.916986e-7,0.0000011863245,0.0008213543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993137,0.00016027264,0.0000997182,0.000043737167,0.00029030492,0.00009227444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992666,0.00006777373,0.00012384982,0.000049919578,0.00044587185,0.000045940724],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005479178,0.000028786968,0.00011675902,0.0000018294076,0.0017446681,0.000008384802,0.00017130039,0.000020383812,0.00073253835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012989475,0.000024411906,0.00011316933,0.000033160242,0.0007912311,0.00015213991,0.000048817546,0.000058216403,0.0000020365364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013850584,0.00002539499,0.00028827583,0.000024395595,0.000056160105,0.000014078229,0.0010515265,2.3913128e-7,0.000013744432,0.9874032,0.0060297227,0.0050793868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001020005,0.000012502337,0.0020477911,0.0004158643,0.000045521076,0.0000039092924,0.009702038,1.2279028e-7,0.000016646909,0.0059170495,0.98170114,0.00003540861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1647014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48489857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9814862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012168539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003274375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204240245","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0063","title":"Clash of powers: Did Operation Car Wash trigger a constitutional crisis in Brazil?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impeachment; Mandate; Politics; Political science; Constitutional amendment; Democracy; Language change; Presidential system; Law; Separation of powers; Political economy; Constitutional crisis; Constitutional court; Sociology; Constitution","score_opus":0.014173507237649693,"score_gpt":0.2587681920036555,"score_spread":0.24459468476600577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204240245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1296196,0.003311135,0.001201452,0.0061687627,0.0006605008,0.00012123607,0.0000535064,0.000013463865,0.85885036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977938,0.001482398,0.00030732778,0.00008517851,0.000083129074,3.7530356e-8,0.0000022982092,8.8564167e-7,0.00024496124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992059,0.000119435,0.00014193336,0.000090526126,0.00031916727,0.00012305025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941254,0.000042363667,0.00009177457,0.00004184771,0.00034585534,0.000065603934],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002692218,0.000050137038,0.00016265643,0.000018983235,0.0006932548,0.000015968868,0.00012431458,0.00005756895,0.0013267077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004963493,0.0000558508,0.00009862412,0.00005892975,0.0010248241,0.00046074067,0.00004435834,0.00008315956,0.0000038818775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055576715,0.00010572016,0.0032348456,0.000003346504,0.00006241174,0.00005771301,0.0061604315,0.000089152985,0.0003688958,0.98703873,0.0024648216,0.00035834915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037712217,0.00015086937,0.025204131,0.00026427375,0.00017229724,0.000053144533,0.24891566,0.000033163997,0.0006345814,0.017253177,0.7031114,0.0004360927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11280537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39480618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9697856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035205725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006091816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204551005","doi":"10.3968/12237","title":"Conceptual and Theoretical Exposition on Democracy and Human Rights","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Human rights; Dignity; Law; Liberal democracy; Politics; Political science; Sociology; Authoritarianism; Political philosophy; Law and economics; Morality; Representative democracy","score_opus":0.017546765297416247,"score_gpt":0.28691303669284185,"score_spread":0.2693662713954256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204551005","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5203974,0.00006058053,0.0000038863222,0.004359461,0.00010664656,0.000049790713,0.000008262807,0.000011260847,0.47500265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987409,0.000008751848,0.000016914337,0.0008726561,0.00026361176,0.0000027111007,0.0000012038894,0.0000013000888,0.00009191748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990764,0.000061017054,0.00006376959,0.0002147972,0.0002759057,0.00030806384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994454,0.00004969327,0.000015642381,0.000032634554,0.000116502226,0.0003401331],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028304564,0.00005399182,0.00007559167,0.000041899817,0.008368648,0.0001255781,0.000087843175,0.000046935376,0.00013060986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010793107,0.000052593008,0.000014700636,0.0003059773,0.010771449,0.00014152002,0.00002928593,0.00007091215,0.000008700535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.209486e-7,0.000004001802,0.0019645311,2.2194612e-7,0.0000016705266,0.000014625935,0.0030766155,8.730364e-9,0.00014771924,0.99393785,0.00017621712,0.0006758097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021543987,0.000048687136,0.043390483,0.000022908633,0.000015658798,0.00000480491,0.018555911,0.0000015584575,0.00031285558,0.84615034,0.091001846,0.00027949188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04277746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1567459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4783435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019046581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005505652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9929223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204738674","doi":"10.3138/ijcs.59.x.50","title":"La couverture médiatique du bilinguisme des juges de la Cour suprême du Canada","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.019578219349205516,"score_gpt":0.2966285379848838,"score_spread":0.2770503186356783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204738674","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42285997,0.21039692,0.00004257051,0.22112209,0.014347163,0.00008950658,0.00043491932,0.0000118572025,0.130695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9163613,0.074795544,0.0002160978,0.0026041842,0.003856442,0.0000028424663,0.0000021635017,0.0000100744055,0.0021514033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768066,0.0005365257,0.00044518692,0.00015126079,0.0008006618,0.00038567194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944725,0.0014464067,0.0002572542,0.000053486827,0.003379136,0.0003912279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010103716,0.00018846663,0.00036230186,0.00022876727,0.00066570775,0.00012597676,0.00040848774,0.00014267961,0.000217111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043509537,0.0001810742,0.00016785995,0.00041927438,0.0017934489,0.00019782028,0.00007851258,0.00038915226,0.0000055481923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035869576,0.00010842113,0.091718584,0.000030403653,0.0038628974,0.016202664,0.021521159,0.00041461247,0.000018133,0.55872655,0.2950071,0.012353602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030585367,0.000022197584,0.02108932,0.00026530243,0.000114568255,0.00089531485,0.02558945,0.000007199977,0.00003291848,0.021211112,0.9302887,0.0001780623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97533065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99895066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6352816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003284887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021287372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98426104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206798443","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198861577.003.0005","title":"How Institutions Influence the Appointment of Women to High Courts","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science","score_opus":0.037009031082535594,"score_gpt":0.27528212440223054,"score_spread":0.23827309331969496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206798443","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023688818,0.00047062087,0.00014715578,0.021968216,0.00031577592,0.00035258927,0.00004175727,0.00003032856,0.9743047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60099113,0.0006882038,0.00008914998,0.0010770236,0.0003098029,0.0000609748,0.000005027296,0.000005406664,0.39677328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988246,0.00002216686,0.0001659025,0.00019934024,0.0005398314,0.0002481739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992318,0.000089541085,0.00009070889,0.00016531203,0.00030554968,0.00011708483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026583136,0.0001376904,0.00025758287,0.0000443282,0.00076999346,0.000065624066,0.00026357773,0.00010362846,0.00047292837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016381522,0.000094797375,0.00008624584,0.000067088964,0.0011693867,0.00006977003,0.00017453032,0.00012285475,0.000060975854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026935597,0.000010113598,0.000009846,0.0000032262762,0.00007934562,0.0000045180386,0.0020487432,0.000016822938,0.0000045083893,0.99542725,0.0010795114,0.0013134215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037830676,0.00002270772,0.0001604358,0.00006443995,0.000022462837,4.2711866e-7,0.002739731,2.9291762e-8,0.000007962904,0.11589924,0.88092595,0.00011879744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049220175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059709693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87984645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042395934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010556754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74406505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207105384","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3760800","title":"The Rule of Law in Canada: Between Formal and Substantive Conceptions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Rule of law; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.014548575065742368,"score_gpt":0.2573971306363092,"score_spread":0.24284855557056684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207105384","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.975529,0.003267533,0.00021986164,0.0072719734,0.000082214705,0.00006110586,0.000009027127,0.0000026800878,0.0135566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99406445,0.0056904214,0.0000015713534,0.000025034897,0.000113025395,0.000001442566,8.8486196e-8,0.0000012116271,0.00010276368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988406,0.00005566795,0.0001262522,0.000044236793,0.00017993663,0.0007533143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996392,0.00018860181,0.00005999567,0.000021700702,0.000059190257,0.00003129481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007939639,0.00003596846,0.0000766022,0.000011221313,0.0008252946,0.000008645726,0.000095457435,0.00001564351,0.0000051098655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053426982,0.000019742096,0.00001851039,0.000067312154,0.0005423551,0.00012458877,0.000017075467,0.00019464474,8.7310644e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005792691,0.000001845047,0.04483891,1.142346e-7,0.000023164088,2.9731106e-7,0.00043625038,1.0628699e-7,0.000011824696,0.93930894,0.0000068986274,0.01536583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038095875,0.000041909298,0.110330634,0.000023697821,0.000014030208,0.0000046562704,0.020265423,1.5996754e-7,0.000033065142,0.84983987,0.018990802,0.000074823765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83260554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16500366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092800567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062620942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99937147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207737894","doi":"","title":"From Ancient to Modern: Constitutionalism in Canada: De l’ancien au moderne : le constitutionnalisme au Canada","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Undergraduate Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Constitutionalism; Humanities; Political science; Legislation; Ethnology; Law; Sociology; Politics; Democracy; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03984702274597606,"score_gpt":0.30308680101337576,"score_spread":0.2632397782673997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207737894","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030521391,0.11270712,0.0042383075,0.7197599,0.0041173175,0.0006635053,0.0006938716,0.000025825557,0.12727277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96077514,0.006328715,0.00033494917,0.03153003,0.0006489604,0.000051178085,0.000018497889,0.0000073322017,0.00030521947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924191,0.00045707068,0.00082514156,0.0009932619,0.002180917,0.0031245002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961779,0.00048072304,0.00012714832,0.0003501244,0.0005683755,0.0022956985],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016268842,0.00036865883,0.0007819248,0.00006724883,0.0018224055,0.00009061442,0.00075426424,0.00008262148,0.00012631534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003288107,0.00037888286,0.00013236603,0.002620558,0.006305081,0.00041781753,0.00038026765,0.00035482002,0.000050764345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024249866,0.00009038162,0.0035724756,0.00012972073,0.000024485502,0.00028047155,0.00025330475,0.00034381088,0.000033785287,0.98936474,0.0031616646,0.0027427252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046370455,0.000018717512,0.027351625,0.0073944037,0.00018487171,0.00011791234,0.002183555,0.001251679,0.00019174712,0.44046876,0.51923525,0.0011377856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.999961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93025374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040520802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.48312736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210439145","doi":"","title":"Constitutional or Political Crisis? Prosecutorial Independence, the Public Interest, and Gender in the SNC-Lavalin Affair","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Independence (probability theory); Cabinet (room); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.04428104730361194,"score_gpt":0.31857816275083445,"score_spread":0.2742971154472225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3210439145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7346683,0.005940767,0.0007757919,0.17153779,0.003114519,0.0011191451,0.000012613219,0.000053680666,0.08277736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967008,0.0008683725,0.0000059517984,0.00081664795,0.0014372488,0.000014254146,8.9012826e-7,0.0000029803016,0.00015283155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99684125,0.0004188933,0.00023961191,0.00018110899,0.0006756207,0.0016435011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931914,0.00029436086,0.00007604293,0.00009100396,0.00013526095,0.00008416647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039314637,0.00011853649,0.00014615174,0.000053132622,0.0010843166,0.00022759818,0.00044874148,0.00010265178,0.00009346702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040475468,0.00006064669,0.000068680165,0.00028296342,0.001401965,0.00028954935,0.0000744997,0.0015345375,0.000041510408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005105987,0.000044639713,0.012847945,0.0000012298674,0.000050521667,0.000005626558,0.0010984824,3.096119e-7,0.0000026023515,0.98525983,0.00029763946,0.00034009822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005106657,0.00009882365,0.0016537741,0.000008779963,0.000019905883,0.00028807583,0.053295724,0.0000028280033,0.0000010497633,0.8921246,0.051877547,0.000118231685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059622334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02765528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26203248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046325647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057724984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211010767","doi":"10.1017/asjcl.2021.28","title":"Constitutional Design of Electoral Governance in Federal States","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Unitary state; Public administration; Political science; Corporate governance; Dilemma; Federalism; State (computer science); Separation of powers; Politics; Political economy; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.06165131828603472,"score_gpt":0.33879412093905,"score_spread":0.2771428026530153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211010767","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2978185,0.013033451,0.03458071,0.017007526,0.0015877228,0.00039492027,0.00006251126,0.000018809496,0.63549584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984131,0.00010530159,0.001185383,0.00011901378,0.00012834393,0.0000010301751,8.1918904e-7,8.888871e-7,0.000046127527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882877,0.00026984606,0.00032213662,0.000068425295,0.00036224487,0.00014858917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990737,0.00013967164,0.00023202537,0.000028896899,0.00047094288,0.00005475713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031722878,0.00006565319,0.00027968027,0.000015093013,0.00022972516,0.000026160109,0.00011044342,0.000026310345,0.0001436967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053288608,0.000058865462,0.00006641985,0.00022690193,0.0017117959,0.00022920729,0.000015191014,0.00013249065,0.0000047013596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069643684,0.00008376239,0.009893327,0.0000014391098,0.00005011764,0.000058642276,0.002692522,0.0007772739,0.00013874922,0.98553556,0.00055940636,0.00013957538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028355808,0.0005238038,0.089534774,0.0006007387,0.00004683763,0.00011926326,0.024864119,0.00006781945,0.0075307004,0.7631449,0.11022076,0.0005106908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003537302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041041574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70059454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000094813295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083657546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63071835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3212684804","doi":"","title":"An American Jurist in London: Bruce Ackerman's Proposals for Constitutional Reform in the UK Versus Bruce Ackerman's Constitutional Theory","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Referendum; Law; Constitutional theory; Parliamentary sovereignty; Democracy; Political science; Convention; Constitutional law; Nomination; Popular sovereignty; Parliament; Sovereignty; Constitutional economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.02295335212475245,"score_gpt":0.31759723073790047,"score_spread":0.294643878613148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3212684804","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72109836,0.0110214995,0.027764574,0.10953567,0.0024510715,0.0038665922,0.0003117927,0.0002377471,0.123712696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953635,0.0016529917,0.00010630791,0.0015029879,0.0012335952,0.00006175703,0.000029230714,0.0000070254405,0.000042635354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962206,0.00045875978,0.00047242106,0.00035016006,0.00073461805,0.0017634407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892706,0.0003651392,0.00022434727,0.00011753585,0.00020233191,0.00016358178],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035149418,0.00022919234,0.00033500468,0.00011111051,0.0014762501,0.000121300385,0.00072969927,0.00009552273,0.00003928989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049059105,0.00017555198,0.00015675506,0.0006753811,0.0066631893,0.00043706517,0.000049986716,0.0013348226,0.000033339325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008651916,0.0001085888,0.0053986195,0.00000339199,0.00007651137,0.000019543559,0.0016897448,0.000052032072,0.000026255404,0.988059,0.00015537537,0.0035457555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0048192595,0.0011561977,0.008805578,0.000076014236,0.00009991534,0.00015395846,0.06805776,0.00007436294,0.000025373625,0.8467467,0.06926283,0.0007220572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002134972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036983337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2742651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020854261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0102997385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213682929","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0099","title":"The city in the constitutional imagination","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Megacity; Constitutionalism; Metropolitan area; Government (linguistics); Politics; Urbanization; State (computer science); City-state; Political economy; Silence; Political science; Emancipation; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Economy; Economics; Economic growth; History; Democracy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.017607447257000513,"score_gpt":0.2546349311284768,"score_spread":0.2370274838714763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213682929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009463619,0.0033101293,0.0005335119,0.016461868,0.00030122465,0.000043482043,0.0000045671504,0.0000040759714,0.96987754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980546,0.0014512216,0.000075489574,0.0001100495,0.00010254832,3.1119168e-8,4.838552e-7,2.530459e-7,0.00020531069],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938047,0.00016517134,0.000054662938,0.000040653897,0.00026961486,0.00008943667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995499,0.00013160074,0.00004642563,0.000033363,0.00021662124,0.000022048423],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055210304,0.000024810071,0.000043911386,0.0000033264503,0.002847278,0.000035657165,0.00017888917,0.000017735994,0.00027031882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000078721496,0.000017809461,0.00004554612,0.000038033326,0.0018833482,0.00023308072,0.000026419877,0.00007961277,0.0000023290027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075442667,0.00002046347,0.0023842654,2.1152158e-7,0.000010700162,0.000022491173,0.0031357408,0.0000029420216,0.0000048400757,0.9922674,0.0008002227,0.0013432113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021824575,0.000006960247,0.027349284,0.000011500441,0.000012508526,0.000017336846,0.067369975,0.0000024873013,0.000004115408,0.04262644,0.86234236,0.00003877729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07451428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6065309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.988591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019252516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002972276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215040550","doi":"10.1017/asjcl.2021.36","title":"Constituting and Regulating Democracy: Kenya's Electoral Commission and the Courts in the 2010s","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Democracy; Remand (court procedure); Commission; Judicial deference; Politics","score_opus":0.038085011693558886,"score_gpt":0.33236658046286177,"score_spread":0.2942815687693029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215040550","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51037234,0.007674583,0.00022644363,0.076481864,0.00026757107,0.00018887415,0.0000016534595,0.000005658595,0.404781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99916583,0.00007691403,0.00018757112,0.000345154,0.00018809279,7.8072225e-7,1.7917104e-7,0.0000010450581,0.000034418576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986971,0.0006329602,0.0002263465,0.00006495615,0.00025092548,0.00012768463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907535,0.00050917326,0.00016587306,0.000039139995,0.00016744436,0.000042999673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011611561,0.00006322627,0.00021578374,0.000015952908,0.0012864643,0.00010951775,0.00010396055,0.000023714225,0.00001187235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012335915,0.000034473247,0.000035844816,0.0001335948,0.002027741,0.00015615788,0.000034790515,0.00022161513,5.8017184e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005182144,0.000014122441,0.008420318,0.0000011496056,0.000024601874,0.000024576564,0.018826509,0.0000074383315,0.000024385747,0.9713092,0.00039986405,0.0008960554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027770987,0.00008203766,0.06661928,0.00037445695,0.00008726813,0.0003510082,0.095711984,0.00009592106,0.0002220889,0.75598294,0.07748767,0.0002082809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032272298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034311593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48879352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019170591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017838876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9894573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215872208","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3714","title":"Positive Charter Rights: When Can We Open the “Door?”","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; McGill University","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Fundamental rights; Reservation of rights; Framing (construction); International human rights law; Law and economics; Human rights; Right to property; Sociology","score_opus":0.031063321784814014,"score_gpt":0.2940116822626364,"score_spread":0.2629483604778224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215872208","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00047319557,0.0012400225,0.00005841006,0.10057091,0.00057579007,0.00010685003,0.000019915818,0.000011697527,0.8969432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99213994,0.00046853756,0.00016942422,0.0030440302,0.0011912469,0.000007976096,0.0000025428244,0.0000045834754,0.0029717402],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986303,0.00030514927,0.00017781682,0.00015178726,0.00042066188,0.00031428703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926966,0.00011099863,0.00009098674,0.00009761316,0.00029125193,0.00013945613],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005156059,0.00009684475,0.00015789726,0.000011927799,0.0053689815,0.0006037707,0.0005195487,0.000051929626,0.0011200577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047684756,0.000061606515,0.00009811764,0.000111924695,0.0005900855,0.0002870857,0.00019155278,0.0002826235,0.00009000215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009023681,0.00003795135,0.00015186158,4.5399895e-7,0.00008629657,0.000109544795,0.005980056,9.517507e-7,0.000025084277,0.98714554,0.0048143887,0.0016388729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018498708,0.000015991413,0.00040719027,0.000050411294,0.000030246629,0.00007035641,0.0038892075,6.3962625e-7,0.00011646528,0.6934291,0.30170926,0.000096113174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22876273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7698094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99166673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011467574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034726437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217106214","doi":"10.1086/716786","title":"Giving Succor to Extremism?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Courts","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Free speech; Political science; Politics; Violent extremism; Law; Human rights; Speech act; Law and economics; Terrorism; Sociology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.02902656697894096,"score_gpt":0.30602295462387435,"score_spread":0.2769963876449334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217106214","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47997993,0.004399485,0.00040343072,0.024775567,0.0009329395,0.000040857307,0.0000026517125,0.000008973895,0.48945615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966508,0.00035622914,0.0002078165,0.0014945047,0.0005800419,3.1182574e-7,4.451824e-8,0.0000012695685,0.0007089599],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948007,0.000032950513,0.00011634104,0.00004670537,0.00022505026,0.000098867924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956447,0.000058836184,0.000049747276,0.000022005088,0.00020025499,0.000104683226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026313122,0.00003276888,0.000098700155,0.000013619857,0.00037689472,0.00004620453,0.00004707276,0.00002056008,0.000094849034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011207992,0.000027244618,0.000038501097,0.00005383696,0.00011096227,0.000091554284,0.00002488718,0.000055739438,0.0000041944663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012460566,0.000034251494,0.002475747,0.0000026276164,0.00003262682,0.0001817067,0.004050742,0.000003992255,0.0005458809,0.98291445,0.0025606768,0.0071848454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000118438875,0.000028517647,0.003455726,0.00006207186,0.000017373359,0.000044964592,0.002692221,3.7863214e-7,0.00016051572,0.044254668,0.9491016,0.00006348678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049456913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001438108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94654095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022576174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001678611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28988078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217180017","doi":"10.5509/2021944707","title":"Life of a Nation’s Text: The Travels and Travails of the Indian Constitution","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific Affairs","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Constitutionalism; Democracy; Constitution of India; Law; Political science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.02185161892354444,"score_gpt":0.2477458469252832,"score_spread":0.22589422800173875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217180017","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050975148,0.0019474864,0.00009501411,0.009532038,0.0004084358,0.00023244838,0.000044733788,0.000012157025,0.93675256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993834,0.00027033663,0.000015399799,0.00002562145,0.000066304085,0.0000059088557,7.65113e-7,0.000001047176,0.00023122161],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929684,0.00011607753,0.0001435431,0.000087296845,0.0002612576,0.00009497805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995211,0.00014316279,0.000083609964,0.00007806933,0.00013372228,0.00004037919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030496693,0.000045867248,0.000100935955,0.000015738395,0.000574213,0.000014356966,0.00009398637,0.00003877349,0.00006142571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006727345,0.000027776952,0.000050611885,0.0002793905,0.0020753723,0.00004908108,0.000029805398,0.00005719594,0.0000030577803],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050223175,0.000032865475,0.0057197213,0.000008807165,0.000042263546,0.0000010078803,0.047787234,0.0000043085834,0.0003798526,0.94327503,0.0004903405,0.0022535252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023334037,0.000014799799,0.025256557,0.00007162352,0.00004758267,0.0000041406815,0.92914796,0.000003736726,0.0014577456,0.020968003,0.022691216,0.00010328211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008864227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002473724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94840825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001928685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064643205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7646795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W323151633","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199578610.013.0041","title":"Judicial Independence as a Constitutional Virtue","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Normative; Judicial independence; Virtue; Law and economics; Politics; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Sociology; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04475587756609455,"score_gpt":0.32161050117442663,"score_spread":0.2768546236083321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W323151633","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000648756,0.009629283,0.00042582085,0.0012228104,0.0055246,0.00034237423,0.00015703053,0.00016735202,0.98246586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5848896,0.08229269,0.00037039272,0.002780018,0.023325237,0.00017348141,0.00026945022,0.000026366522,0.30587277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99658865,0.00017206583,0.00035773223,0.00042221832,0.0017802232,0.0006791203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873316,0.00022922845,0.00018454865,0.00015381273,0.00037612487,0.00032311174],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005819299,0.000324144,0.00048105145,0.00014078479,0.0019982078,0.00010676039,0.0005016854,0.00079629576,0.0066858414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046825537,0.00029055797,0.000213297,0.00032930358,0.0053649857,0.00028231362,0.00022092505,0.00074528175,0.0040203654],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012061929,0.0000623922,0.0005784635,0.000007659267,0.000085593325,0.000012645113,0.00024294731,3.299355e-7,9.767577e-8,0.84204763,0.14566085,0.011289312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013298307,0.000017952127,0.00021758472,0.00015993742,0.00008616003,0.000007999138,0.0008142272,1.7935128e-7,0.0000013977843,0.06886538,0.9293135,0.00038271764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033955134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008643382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78365266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040958906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006145678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W334677990","doi":"10.7202/1034051ar","title":"Constitutional Amendment by Stealth","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Boston College","keywords":"Constitutional amendment; Legitimacy; Political science; Constitution; Deliberation; Law; Democracy; Politics; Convention; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.07335461904596215,"score_gpt":0.3288064311958844,"score_spread":0.25545181214992224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W334677990","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012816517,0.00079424045,0.00030220102,0.0060718004,0.0010790421,0.00007117015,0.000056197678,0.000032365988,0.9903113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979078,0.00020363055,0.00016990572,0.0009434197,0.0005376121,0.000003587052,0.00000255593,0.0000017404654,0.00022973542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869937,0.00011170775,0.00017907601,0.00009619749,0.00063676725,0.0002768676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926376,0.000035063564,0.000081264625,0.00003682311,0.00022456388,0.00035854208],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007652648,0.00007163506,0.000111614376,0.000013476561,0.0059270984,0.00005559104,0.00013653382,0.000040164818,0.00017032774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000906207,0.000061011462,0.000050634764,0.00009097888,0.0015400887,0.0001999979,0.000032056156,0.00015968399,0.00013993194],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010469572,0.00004403355,0.00028410388,3.398586e-7,0.000021068267,0.000012210962,0.00018352368,0.000008342047,0.0000042425877,0.98144084,0.016674737,0.0013160618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030208743,0.00003528153,0.000019401195,0.0000101891565,0.000008726599,0.000027456623,0.0018312496,4.5204533e-7,0.000023690036,0.029937526,0.9677217,0.00008221199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009476452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011897144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99662614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037155204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012129877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99711955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W343874663","doi":"","title":"Remedial Consensus and Dialogue Under the Charter: General Declarations and Delayed Declarations of Invalidity","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Jurisdiction; Remedial education; Appeal; Antipathy; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04298341276198668,"score_gpt":0.27683562427799424,"score_spread":0.23385221151600755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W343874663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9676303,0.0065800813,0.0012957494,0.02031907,0.00022096178,0.00016085921,0.000011709857,0.000013462776,0.0037677905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98560303,0.013462558,0.000040517738,0.0001962632,0.0004678744,0.0000048331367,0.0000016299299,0.0000029179246,0.00022038561],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987309,0.00018820194,0.00018660047,0.0000971798,0.0002241933,0.00057293015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994951,0.00018431726,0.000093335024,0.000050728882,0.000112525384,0.00006401342],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087884115,0.00007225015,0.000113110036,0.000036179048,0.0017205592,0.000049474133,0.00008901291,0.000053802723,0.000023454111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015086346,0.00005299474,0.000040529532,0.00013173139,0.00089377805,0.00008440308,0.000024436327,0.00041067417,0.0000033904987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008684519,0.000024816709,0.0023656494,3.4991564e-7,0.00009072496,6.8470024e-7,0.0021707206,0.000009347606,0.0001476688,0.9930464,0.0004554863,0.0016794397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005920049,0.00016539668,0.007655821,0.000008257428,0.00012021712,0.00013922917,0.015357844,0.00015402061,0.0000275625,0.9691067,0.006504555,0.00016841556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017344127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10574545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10401104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001228714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070228556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W348787066","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1256","title":"Constitutionalism from the Top Down","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Legislature; Charter; Constitutional theory; Supreme court; Law; Premise; Political science; Judicial review; Legislation; Judicial interpretation; Law and economics; Interpretation (philosophy); Separation of powers; Sociology; Constitutional law; Democracy; Epistemology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028576512744437246,"score_gpt":0.29817402246976893,"score_spread":0.2695975097253317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W348787066","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044386317,0.0019739487,0.0019359757,0.01181926,0.0013001222,0.00007695079,0.000020873666,0.000031264903,0.978403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941416,0.00019987319,0.00031771234,0.0022539315,0.0029249224,0.0000013079143,0.0000029566631,0.0000028277288,0.00015489475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986793,0.00009323828,0.00021514884,0.000110826564,0.00057644193,0.0003250484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991037,0.00040419417,0.00009148889,0.00007826693,0.00017741745,0.00014489524],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012749911,0.00008462273,0.00010929573,0.000014936479,0.0045385673,0.00015344011,0.000300847,0.00006825404,0.0010049229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017157805,0.000055797293,0.000100472134,0.00012087992,0.0015492785,0.00019041191,0.000045273584,0.00028534242,0.00014437137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013580816,0.000021746579,0.0044772946,1.3868627e-7,0.000043938006,0.000028011065,0.0008629125,0.0000037570387,0.000016567295,0.98947597,0.0029293294,0.0021267745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001882461,0.0000060504162,0.010928498,0.00001811544,0.000021878475,0.000013381086,0.0021658842,2.6980382e-7,0.000017449394,0.5555031,0.4310499,0.000087233646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21622425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43487245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98970294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008397691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022092808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W361335273","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1033","title":"\"Was it Something I Said?\": Losing the Majority on the Modern Supreme Court of Canada, 1984-2011","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Appeal; Law; Phenomenon; Position (finance); Political science; Swing; Persuasion; Social psychology; Psychology; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0516525433061658,"score_gpt":0.27889134604270555,"score_spread":0.22723880273653974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W361335273","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020114651,0.0017923476,0.0002579776,0.05494521,0.0012071222,0.0001389768,0.000016253922,0.000012002133,0.92151546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967312,0.00014728309,0.00006436657,0.0015315552,0.0011772657,0.0000026704788,3.354169e-7,0.0000057958905,0.00033948055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788743,0.00033730347,0.00025501742,0.00009131944,0.0009454347,0.00048348893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883413,0.000492575,0.00019176846,0.00012087552,0.00021486371,0.00014575693],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025082598,0.00011170657,0.0001680271,0.0000168497,0.0045641335,0.00008406022,0.00040903,0.000056443107,0.00026952682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026400463,0.00006319037,0.000089594265,0.00010403119,0.00067118235,0.00022874023,0.00006961471,0.00047223698,0.000013492371],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012620131,0.000040862924,0.0020584653,0.0000017228983,0.00006668262,0.000003607215,0.0046690363,0.000048082504,0.000045978828,0.98713475,0.005190109,0.0007280824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034331932,0.000051636707,0.010268348,0.00018983809,0.00014396505,0.00004881685,0.016140437,0.000078289544,0.0004909196,0.82616985,0.14568904,0.000385553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92802435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9768802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9766166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024600682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006194303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W362437993","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1067","title":"Book Notes: Against Judicial Activism: The Decline of Freedom and Democracy in Canada, by Rory Leishman","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.024548785037162717,"score_gpt":0.24341363280102496,"score_spread":0.21886484776386225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W362437993","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09356909,0.014474133,0.00021833616,0.016872395,0.00085211755,0.00025951443,0.000042079428,0.000015600988,0.87369674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995987,0.0016672958,0.00006831893,0.0019373336,0.00028781826,0.0000024468957,7.179862e-7,0.00000502496,0.000044074342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874914,0.00014671526,0.0002838477,0.00011510331,0.00042053065,0.00028467886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993616,0.00018550515,0.00017468723,0.000064116,0.00009723767,0.00011685411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000531271,0.000099554934,0.00020082232,0.00002399253,0.0012337723,0.000028917644,0.00025632046,0.000048408292,0.00012618527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012982237,0.00007365048,0.000045014775,0.00010333253,0.00079126604,0.0002173651,0.0000762895,0.0002822928,0.000002094589],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018029682,0.00024069998,0.07599091,0.000008325546,0.00019545482,0.000128301,0.008013147,0.00005543854,0.00026868496,0.8637717,0.03413064,0.017016396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030916133,0.00023295068,0.16842702,0.00042482445,0.0002030979,0.00007420681,0.020798558,0.00013438794,0.00094973214,0.5545042,0.25005606,0.0011033678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99514204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99941546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9024179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017619641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088030443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9489304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W364420650","doi":"","title":"Judicial Review, a Comparative Perspective: Israel, Canada, and the United States","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Political science; Judicial review; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.02409716982109236,"score_gpt":0.3242096136020626,"score_spread":0.30011244378097024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W364420650","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18218184,0.007911587,0.000022978267,0.1625276,0.00053810683,0.00059561216,0.000023156783,0.00004619768,0.6461529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869916,0.0043272413,0.000017640548,0.007955836,0.00019889126,0.00001494863,0.000002591133,0.0000011645902,0.0004900921],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934477,0.00010225229,0.00008675682,0.00009655613,0.00023524048,0.00013445337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934876,0.00026828537,0.000033499186,0.000045515375,0.00025121198,0.000052738513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035204273,0.000058046477,0.00014213471,0.000013225461,0.0010636573,0.000023529292,0.00009782462,0.000017074251,0.0001531722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027000866,0.000033572633,0.000019948257,0.00023750703,0.0018782563,0.000040162082,0.000033591583,0.00013150432,0.000006462065],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010376437,0.000005345641,0.00064083835,0.0000014552357,0.000020327008,7.6219857e-7,0.0035162221,2.811755e-7,0.0000014229772,0.96704787,0.028685255,0.00006985252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004062809,0.0000104114115,0.0072777495,0.000040304727,0.000047807134,0.0000013471436,0.072264045,0.00002339104,0.0000058564365,0.078095175,0.8416816,0.0001460415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99672234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8889527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045363406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004801145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W36673133","doi":"10.21991/c9gd4z","title":"SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND THE SAME OLD CONSTITUTION*","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Politics; Law; Political science; Constitution; Political question; Institution; Same sex; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.03515265728374515,"score_gpt":0.26173373985162673,"score_spread":0.2265810825678816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W36673133","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005829686,0.0053912564,0.020848082,0.02620562,0.004001778,0.0019627449,0.0003422776,0.0005604778,0.9348581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884992,0.0011833527,0.0009792305,0.006236899,0.0005118461,0.00026122475,0.000038947142,0.000010982157,0.002278298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957522,0.00038325143,0.0008493686,0.0007932769,0.0009922473,0.001229619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975891,0.00066017546,0.00030539607,0.00045566473,0.00052404805,0.00046560026],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015566107,0.0005307675,0.000681015,0.00024811013,0.008347747,0.00022609149,0.00070680695,0.00033713927,0.000993106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015494399,0.0004143367,0.00036957162,0.0006677609,0.07213298,0.0009815041,0.00041572217,0.0005369548,0.00044321833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023639442,0.00011797405,0.018509898,0.00000866563,0.00020283977,0.00003890672,0.0021206813,0.000016216969,0.000013475087,0.97374964,0.0036957785,0.0012895244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004046005,0.000052185187,0.001747459,0.00015321524,0.00022758148,0.00024574384,0.020943727,0.00006431589,0.00007373885,0.5870932,0.3845106,0.0008422479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014334523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005557855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98266953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031532557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024914297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W37532511","doi":"10.1212/wnl.0000000000207738","title":"La riforma costituzionale della giustizia: separazione delle carriere e status del pubblico ministero","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rivista trimestrale di diritto e procedura civile","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.0432275909107419,"score_gpt":0.28990156395138816,"score_spread":0.24667397304064625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W37532511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47369817,0.0031873998,0.00026047011,0.00048944785,0.00046706232,0.000816823,0.00037952053,0.00038871184,0.5203124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945909,0.0008548407,0.00046767003,0.00023255474,0.00031772527,0.00016180614,0.000094156574,0.000032275937,0.003248079],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967854,0.00019657792,0.00055449543,0.0005952623,0.00073898956,0.0011292779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835116,0.00022012893,0.00021982814,0.00028180124,0.00034295372,0.0005841062],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005295966,0.00039044127,0.00046149577,0.00015066664,0.0016800055,0.00018381648,0.0005168674,0.00026721516,0.0005282616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004092338,0.00038552206,0.0001847459,0.000616732,0.0019888207,0.0005798205,0.00016516313,0.0003634275,0.00031270355],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006852335,0.0025619995,0.21376792,0.00031440542,0.0006714785,0.000382737,0.048347875,0.000031345513,0.00046988347,0.61394334,0.10234133,0.016482439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012306913,0.00017702529,0.074509025,0.00013364528,0.00016788061,0.000042688207,0.008369142,0.000029481243,0.00035381643,0.010528847,0.9034733,0.0009844153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010588017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006107974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.801132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002503826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020485604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W37792945","doi":"10.1126/sciadv.adk5670","title":"Policy, legal, and constitutional implications of Chaoulli v. Quebec","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Advances","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03067527393966956,"score_gpt":0.3461197924075687,"score_spread":0.3154445184678991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W37792945","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48414633,0.0059900316,0.0032167495,0.029102458,0.00053888257,0.00035398387,0.000055742097,0.000102512866,0.4764933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978948,0.0009602132,0.00040202576,0.0001942699,0.00013409962,0.000009136511,5.019652e-7,7.094124e-7,0.00040421076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991224,0.000015264115,0.00011799757,0.00017286338,0.000359562,0.00021194419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950486,0.00006612683,0.00006010023,0.000067429144,0.00021332024,0.00008815172],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024787008,0.000051466362,0.00009150454,0.00010166012,0.0023486223,0.00001993115,0.0002043038,0.000017157294,0.000015801843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037580478,0.0000450701,0.000021151645,0.0008237416,0.052438207,0.0007989894,0.000053825413,0.000036292877,0.0000072647827],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014770599,0.000014753828,0.014389111,9.865096e-7,0.0000016590983,4.9200156e-7,0.0006471746,0.000008148688,0.0009263159,0.9792813,0.000045972203,0.004682574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026601672,0.000052665237,0.22890584,0.000039471528,0.000010553095,0.00003447215,0.0050127404,0.0000024636847,0.0024245845,0.28545225,0.47747746,0.000321475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01578951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008760881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69382906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006525222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025565366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W408162197","doi":"10.3138/9781442621039","title":"Brian Dickson: A Judge's Journey","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Political science; Biography; Economic Justice; Institution; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.043454937718561515,"score_gpt":0.3001841140664117,"score_spread":0.2567291763478502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W408162197","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000024093451,0.0022544842,0.00005683365,0.003280296,0.0010582419,0.0001696937,0.00001144402,0.00008344445,0.9930832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006255934,0.0014907764,0.000058243495,0.0016701679,0.0016974446,0.00000838394,0.0000073563638,0.000009582442,0.99443245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986601,0.000065810345,0.00018467994,0.00022990492,0.0005493765,0.00031012835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945974,0.000071206974,0.0000900138,0.00009783108,0.00013478415,0.00014644735],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033191763,0.00016412069,0.00027344137,0.00005411644,0.001091802,0.000079681784,0.00021879231,0.0002590204,0.0041880626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001297218,0.0001440771,0.00016033153,0.00008825249,0.000818244,0.000069168964,0.000044113116,0.00023474947,0.0011694614],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.469707e-7,0.0000062378326,0.000023694616,0.0000012843684,0.000028594355,0.000008270732,0.00027159124,4.9876604e-8,4.8487113e-8,0.56208104,0.43654028,0.0010379454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005296808,0.000008183267,0.000028378612,0.000032677537,0.000026721715,0.0000011902869,0.00026573354,3.1831053e-8,2.1249508e-7,0.23290022,0.76652503,0.00015866786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025460764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009149139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32998472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029078324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023645258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200113419","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12340092","title":"Editor’s Note","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Graduate students; Library science; Editorial board; Medical education; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.033364975740074965,"score_gpt":0.33871993353317564,"score_spread":0.3053549577931007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200113419","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048886105,0.111834526,0.00089064304,0.13923724,0.04421085,0.00016228527,0.00001706811,0.000071221686,0.6546901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824325,0.0036301434,0.0004379041,0.0003063695,0.012327629,0.0000013632201,1.0539366e-7,0.0000031917511,0.00086081953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874634,0.00012488695,0.0002779025,0.0000849278,0.0005547693,0.00021117393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826735,0.0002559413,0.00018368062,0.000046705798,0.0011569746,0.00008937315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050713005,0.000077636825,0.00028020452,0.00004095765,0.0007709881,0.000043532196,0.00014352147,0.000027752589,0.00004364756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015093797,0.00006139552,0.0001406283,0.00031766997,0.00072055135,0.00022017323,0.00007180132,0.0001551816,0.000016128673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008524845,0.00022750985,0.005353886,0.000013591588,0.0012564842,0.00110646,0.041434478,0.000039438408,0.00026041162,0.5902228,0.34669125,0.013308485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001474799,0.00005273103,0.0009190275,0.00004149685,0.000053879834,0.000018763141,0.04451265,1.4698446e-7,0.00007783076,0.011176132,0.942917,0.000082888284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042525888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001389804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93354636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014102017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006112372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59298956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200446431","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-88704-9_1","title":"Legal Foundations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Future of business and finance","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Political science; Law; Legal realism; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Legal research; Law and economics; Democracy; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.019267282782617468,"score_gpt":0.24774003795693336,"score_spread":0.2284727551743159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200446431","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010048664,0.020797595,0.00009033136,0.0041618496,0.0010677838,0.00006839391,0.000044917047,0.000009796821,0.97365886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.085158266,0.120358355,0.00045969864,0.00028257072,0.006503887,0.000011615546,0.000064062624,0.000017293904,0.78714424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947643,0.0000045488114,0.000119308446,0.00014487645,0.00016791494,0.000086924716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994474,0.000019220906,0.00010110713,0.00006609953,0.00035309794,0.00001307414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000051634113,0.00009307619,0.00021247372,0.00002514939,0.00042844022,0.000025937417,0.00006715878,0.00013297077,0.00012922642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020560718,0.00008831658,0.000045325392,0.00006448981,0.0005532062,0.00007576152,0.00004114933,0.00008492585,0.000006314373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026217233,0.000005077518,0.000015133784,0.000010912841,0.000013354292,0.000007069902,0.00012865919,8.8149994e-7,5.8280045e-7,0.97795796,0.0016369816,0.020220773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004115636,0.0000032966418,0.0018568243,0.00012628321,0.000019696203,0.0000010976281,0.000095820964,1.387875e-7,3.1844186e-7,0.051600832,0.9461572,0.00009731757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012549052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003412299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94452024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015894502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003303963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36014456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205190003","doi":"10.1017/cls.2021.42","title":"The Attorney General, Politics, and the Public Interest: Contributions to an Evolving Constitutional Convention","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Convention; Public interest; Duty; Discretion; Normative; Objectivity (philosophy); Politics; Constitution; Independence (probability theory); Transparency (behavior); Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02730702609206853,"score_gpt":0.28871325788954577,"score_spread":0.26140623179747724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205190003","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6390154,0.009069798,0.0005296586,0.309553,0.0037372112,0.00073021994,0.0009684087,0.000020625346,0.036375728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925784,0.0003201199,0.00003115022,0.0060743853,0.0005155216,0.000020202846,0.000009241855,0.000004718624,0.0004462698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857813,0.0003473789,0.00028932787,0.00013756314,0.00014363947,0.00050398713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978422,0.00036010426,0.00015521761,0.00008846952,0.000601937,0.0009520764],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002494191,0.00009707397,0.00020385091,0.000034545963,0.009997476,0.00032579675,0.00028338164,0.000051277308,0.0000753866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000708319,0.00007835764,0.00016072336,0.00016137707,0.0047691385,0.0002569211,0.00005455965,0.00036590477,6.4514603e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004531173,0.000005422328,0.00028908456,0.00000191687,0.00009103179,0.000011206525,0.010599191,0.0000063025695,0.000002452342,0.98592734,0.0028302767,0.00023123423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000591046,0.00006241482,0.00067758304,0.000018665294,0.000055193388,0.00012164796,0.048523467,0.000051491697,4.6854134e-7,0.17189972,0.77786976,0.00012854535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15031078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8005472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8140276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012124873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029467554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205734915","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006226","title":"The Coxford Lecture: Arbitrariness","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Supreme court; Law; Rule of law; Power (physics); Order (exchange); Political science; Public law; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.016492290511753098,"score_gpt":0.2696170006024874,"score_spread":0.2531247100907343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205734915","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06569853,0.009986345,0.0026833115,0.049511436,0.0048180483,0.00020594416,0.000007687863,0.00002195204,0.86706674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974838,0.00023032815,0.000053200434,0.0012354738,0.0008411187,0.000001340909,1.0885723e-7,0.0000032557125,0.0001513741],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989835,0.00011034351,0.00020385964,0.00007027509,0.00030146082,0.0003305477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988531,0.00023897403,0.00012609983,0.00008121606,0.00030124022,0.000399389],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000912543,0.00006938119,0.00012272374,0.000030892763,0.0024225782,0.00015874211,0.00048542317,0.000046660745,0.000046133013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004975637,0.000047519537,0.00007603978,0.00016519785,0.0014364687,0.00015095744,0.000010444428,0.00019884673,0.000017745879],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004204983,0.0000022539316,0.0018801499,8.5026056e-7,0.000015174159,0.000017558306,0.00082293304,0.000018176002,0.0000038251783,0.9902007,0.0013781748,0.0056559774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006192214,0.000026281517,0.0031318027,0.00002794265,0.000012106872,0.000014034499,0.00021768673,0.0000020034727,0.000019431352,0.11013894,0.88628113,0.00006669999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12727596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7818279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9317853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001140875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016790027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99887615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205991489","doi":"10.17762/de.vol2022iss1.8686","title":"Shedding a Light on the Rights of the Accused: An Indian Perspective","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Design Engineering","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Period (music); Faith; Cover (algebra); Good faith; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.022987090253094904,"score_gpt":0.2525576807186526,"score_spread":0.2295705904655577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205991489","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83528185,0.00075311266,0.0059367963,0.020309106,0.0027548163,0.0017940399,0.000039639628,0.00031222208,0.1328184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996678,0.0000027546478,0.00004621196,0.000077940844,0.0001226806,0.000036768124,1.0090601e-7,0.0000031153015,0.000042592186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934214,0.00010890577,0.00006063978,0.00008399914,0.00027582486,0.00012851192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996842,0.00015750286,0.000026596399,0.00008112892,0.000028570159,0.000021971075],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038759617,0.00005099776,0.000059565493,0.0000311495,0.0013301722,0.000014068289,0.00026002637,0.000013550625,0.000055982844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011279128,0.000030781615,0.000039808652,0.00029520103,0.000074531556,0.000048476515,0.00005295129,0.00012959309,0.0000019608474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048759725,0.000018489745,0.00006619908,5.017554e-7,0.000021261132,0.000002183138,0.026423525,0.011386707,0.00047463283,0.9613457,0.00019024959,0.00006571038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001047186,0.0007390829,0.027957065,0.00024447154,0.00017639251,0.000014660917,0.26243952,0.0069027375,0.01922179,0.30767852,0.3719135,0.0016650788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029109006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003341267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65366715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015203736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006477343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206204301","doi":"10.7202/1068168ar","title":"THE EQUAL RIGHTS TRUST","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Internet privacy; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.027968082917711964,"score_gpt":0.27373986516243115,"score_spread":0.24577178224471918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206204301","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016533844,0.0064419075,0.0010173025,0.24690694,0.0050823996,0.00017822318,0.00011474485,0.00006379319,0.7236608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97332764,0.0019040197,0.00008489103,0.003563013,0.0075093885,0.000024464263,0.000011774627,0.0000092815135,0.013565524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984671,0.00010698216,0.00031223308,0.00026550656,0.0004677828,0.00038039914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902904,0.00032628485,0.0001354518,0.000087959466,0.00020088823,0.00022035219],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030345842,0.00014369523,0.0001642404,0.000020908781,0.0011448333,0.00014365488,0.0006529117,0.00010866841,0.0007386936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040620024,0.00013252904,0.00019450247,0.0002484186,0.0010235013,0.00019559849,0.00008705706,0.00025871428,0.0010750818],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043804244,0.00004561872,0.00058832124,0.000006277701,0.00015757015,0.000044660326,0.0037554668,0.000053811855,0.000009900393,0.9734328,0.010125522,0.011736251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014552558,0.000029110273,0.0006604499,0.000046161185,0.00003249698,0.000010693377,0.0005270066,0.00096833473,0.0000095228825,0.23488787,0.76255167,0.00013116882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022510437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019403962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9567938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047169693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040011952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206248230","doi":"10.21991/c9qx0s","title":"CONSTITUTIONAL DIALOGUES BETWEEN COURTS AND LEGISLATURES: CAN WE TALK?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Democracy; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.05817665794960814,"score_gpt":0.2739440819670126,"score_spread":0.21576742401740445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206248230","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023546599,0.0119809415,0.050081816,0.030462805,0.006384504,0.002323766,0.0029541005,0.0011552523,0.8711102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943225,0.0014169454,0.0013353731,0.0013229798,0.00090677536,0.00014004685,0.00020113503,0.000011866135,0.0003423707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954566,0.00021818165,0.0008565144,0.0009383902,0.0011232716,0.0014070459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99751645,0.0004420529,0.0003123742,0.00034245817,0.0006444581,0.00074220804],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007232045,0.00061810605,0.000715327,0.0002967747,0.0064705317,0.00019160513,0.0005820942,0.00049635605,0.00055931363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000873017,0.0006136491,0.00031205133,0.000491925,0.056172073,0.0010478208,0.0003544488,0.0005752239,0.00019699539],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059325015,0.00012657655,0.06331104,0.000013171338,0.0002374474,0.00008060516,0.0012823233,0.000010703231,0.000024377625,0.92979544,0.0027771853,0.0022817696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012903344,0.00008522332,0.005609073,0.0002594507,0.00020751082,0.00017740697,0.0052052634,0.000008035584,0.00011373963,0.45062727,0.5354221,0.0009946035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005262192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048466134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9707759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041861666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035903926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206636438","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226474.003.0001","title":"Introduction","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Constitution; Political science; Meaning (existential); Law; Politics; Federalism; Constitutional interpretation; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02554990798535728,"score_gpt":0.23755364328987003,"score_spread":0.21200373530451275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206636438","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000075942376,0.00011312411,0.00017679943,0.0002443396,0.0007178175,0.00018753971,0.00002322842,0.00011953497,0.99841005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00016280472,0.00048701366,0.000049504957,0.000051002036,0.0029317082,2.824832e-7,0.000016926413,0.000006913839,0.99629384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990157,0.00004589373,0.00008742639,0.00024856025,0.00035460794,0.00024779706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994895,0.000047035846,0.00009787467,0.00012121558,0.0001531378,0.000091270376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019852511,0.00013318917,0.00017790943,0.00009637672,0.0009616772,0.000025963307,0.00026343265,0.00027060226,0.00007561944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018856223,0.00015904683,0.00010983022,0.000018489594,0.0009595048,0.000071780756,0.00012635837,0.00024883752,0.000004979754],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026061532,0.000005374552,0.0000020224788,0.000004707355,0.000049871618,0.000022436865,0.00049228535,6.2363677e-7,3.4718659e-7,0.869135,0.12436047,0.0059007425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000094440875,0.000012171925,0.0000068579657,0.000020110636,0.00007351116,5.77109e-7,0.00047426016,1.5364313e-7,0.0000027090264,0.006118611,0.9930223,0.00017424833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017452928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013403313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8686619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051498506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000495592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73965406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206658582","doi":"10.2478/vjls-2021-0006","title":"Constitutional Theories of Emergency Powers and their Limits: Perspectives from Vietnam, India and Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Vietnamese Journal of Legal Sciences","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Public Works and Government Services Canada","funders":"","keywords":"State of emergency; Legislature; State (computer science); Political science; Attribution; Separation of powers; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Politics; Mathematics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.015141841555293497,"score_gpt":0.27465145225914667,"score_spread":0.25950961070385314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206658582","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91300607,0.036725182,0.00007604045,0.010167586,0.0010617203,0.000058448855,0.000070407616,0.0000047237145,0.038829826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943568,0.0050480044,0.00021034827,0.00009789327,0.0002449242,7.088539e-7,4.0850915e-7,0.000001168463,0.00003972709],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985759,0.00015215686,0.0003228665,0.00016697659,0.0005886139,0.00019346096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884164,0.00021253862,0.00026464567,0.00004104597,0.00050491013,0.00013520144],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006899777,0.00010464381,0.00026696542,0.000043917258,0.0010496131,0.000066077024,0.00018771169,0.00003811077,0.00017700007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008362045,0.00007269802,0.00006516684,0.00036404093,0.004645029,0.00047718466,0.000059265574,0.00013243692,2.5998312e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021038553,0.000042543143,0.06653116,0.00000381791,0.000101354,0.000029213568,0.015549339,0.000006957821,0.0005691784,0.91523236,0.00046038898,0.0014526512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048351422,0.00021772565,0.07399926,0.00021271224,0.00007727755,0.00007561016,0.7148779,0.000005648459,0.0006063292,0.1287163,0.080360964,0.00036676766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1719175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4037137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7865161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000072992974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034963377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99806374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W42093933","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1022","title":"The New Borders of the Constitutional","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Charter; Scholarship; Pragmatism; Constitutional theory; Normative; Politics; Object (grammar); Political science; Liberal democracy; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Democracy; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018122374446970718,"score_gpt":0.2773363973950021,"score_spread":0.25921402294803136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W42093933","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00070596556,0.0012692767,0.00030126053,0.039882608,0.0009110934,0.00011659078,0.000002006894,0.000008847078,0.95680237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974736,0.00037598884,0.00009241136,0.0004777194,0.00053592114,0.0000030589745,1.1912608e-7,0.0000015763236,0.0010396006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989632,0.00010559246,0.00018184494,0.00005985343,0.0004747381,0.00021481568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993458,0.00015310547,0.0001232522,0.00007178405,0.00021015786,0.0000958915],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036668277,0.000058690624,0.00007961284,0.0000080225545,0.0044617346,0.00011906713,0.0003597984,0.000036687794,0.00034708015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001924963,0.000030030864,0.00010880436,0.00011347181,0.0038608345,0.00016230403,0.000053076412,0.00018293982,0.000056733326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027335684,0.000010072752,0.00094426685,2.889942e-7,0.000029947443,4.5779942e-7,0.00027742883,0.000013646888,0.000024592979,0.9836243,0.012708747,0.0023635472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000121124336,0.0000070614064,0.0021997117,0.000017360875,0.000011315823,0.000010832131,0.0014201393,0.0000015428898,0.00002674441,0.66599065,0.33014828,0.000045228506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1537683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18826471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99676764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049469072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006821262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210783218","doi":"10.4000/essais.10978","title":"Image(s) et Constitution(s). Un regard français sur le savoir constitutionnel canadien","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Essais","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.037445637951037156,"score_gpt":0.2612851350502604,"score_spread":0.22383949709922324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210783218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042653836,0.042693246,0.00220818,0.047763936,0.008855903,0.00043813724,0.00038173716,0.00016966743,0.85483533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901215,0.0015850507,0.000938374,0.0016893798,0.0016905804,0.00004816092,0.000025223851,0.000012326591,0.0038894215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99696827,0.0004225814,0.0004669386,0.00040504313,0.000602107,0.0011350788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982334,0.00035247448,0.00018013731,0.00025487976,0.0004261584,0.0005529631],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012305462,0.00035054146,0.0004555406,0.00008948918,0.0028703664,0.00011147984,0.00033501966,0.00028610532,0.0017112708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00083334383,0.00037065384,0.00022935045,0.00069047476,0.008798921,0.001453507,0.00015729011,0.00040295627,0.0018682611],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013789884,0.00030448832,0.021013914,0.000020421268,0.0001623878,0.00003427465,0.006731018,0.000014154157,0.00003118066,0.93311816,0.034286186,0.0042700046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000732502,0.000026580608,0.019303538,0.00013665047,0.00014908011,0.000052435767,0.0036766632,0.000013439577,0.00013624647,0.018777506,0.95643574,0.00055963633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39863923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08697361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9474676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005682441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025527286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210901948","doi":"10.3138/9781487533717-003","title":"A Brief History of the Mega-Constitutional Era in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mega-; Political science; History; Astronomy; Physics","score_opus":0.02385562432856807,"score_gpt":0.1924373742280567,"score_spread":0.16858174989948863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210901948","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000058930284,0.007295682,0.00000457252,0.00007306519,0.0005212377,0.00012774649,0.0000861655,0.0000043070154,0.9918283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.060006548,0.00066857523,0.000028202643,0.00006314945,0.000073190335,2.3021134e-7,0.000003383702,0.0000026904447,0.939154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991382,0.000041463136,0.00012559422,0.00014951821,0.00043121132,0.00011403575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943805,0.00005744194,0.00016897045,0.00012313823,0.00017074819,0.00004168085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007510763,0.000095716845,0.00024184992,0.000008540102,0.0001705749,0.0000018951176,0.00032238342,0.00009582236,0.0005540386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019522846,0.00010111194,0.000115074436,0.0000012885482,0.0021778361,0.000044459248,0.00016644354,0.00012603143,2.0226675e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000150990745,0.0000054919337,0.00008187876,0.000010945057,0.00006606704,0.000018762685,0.002839727,0.0000050092444,0.000003250243,0.9896131,0.006355294,0.0009853768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013693441,0.0000033173483,0.0003738425,0.00015435388,0.00004420457,3.6776692e-7,0.00040361856,5.7868476e-7,0.0000029429516,0.0011542812,0.99762696,0.00009858252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99935895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9912717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043510357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012357437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99947107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210949202","doi":"10.1017/9781108784283.005","title":"History (III): Exporting Parliamentary Public Finance","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Commonwealth; Public finance; Political science; Colonialism; Government (linguistics); Law; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.06027181376004376,"score_gpt":0.2174132720863344,"score_spread":0.15714145832629065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210949202","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006040766,0.0017977692,0.00007031209,0.00040758375,0.00061240344,0.00026892018,0.00006930302,0.00016197728,0.99655133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020000707,0.000896088,0.000036148118,0.0005054242,0.00057313044,0.0000012822462,0.000018313238,0.00001631498,0.9779526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985988,0.000043950564,0.00018900349,0.0004292562,0.00043193178,0.00030704422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991658,0.000056184497,0.00028682637,0.0001683056,0.00014982426,0.00017308576],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012907958,0.00023737634,0.0003424311,0.00007176522,0.00081868435,0.000027572303,0.00046106314,0.0002171488,0.00002526134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027635968,0.00030366643,0.00020413725,0.000009763566,0.0012713876,0.00014381297,0.00031667654,0.00036067676,0.00003350799],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018018847,0.000004743175,0.000006654236,0.000008479325,0.00007978191,0.00020729608,0.00036166777,1.3946728e-7,0.0000036757754,0.8714466,0.1266561,0.0012068381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019171543,0.000015822014,0.000009516789,0.00006884388,0.00008839112,7.299788e-7,0.0005627577,0.0000015437073,0.0000057035295,0.000113168826,0.9986179,0.00032392557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00698536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021565674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8719618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011611958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008127613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211093583","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4030006","title":"Women’s Charter Equality at the Supreme Court of Canada: Surprising Losses or Anticipated Failures?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.031481049991932485,"score_gpt":0.28474213990046515,"score_spread":0.2532610899085327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211093583","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9801738,0.0017721255,0.00006416917,0.01284899,0.00039592866,0.00012455913,0.000025158086,0.000012293189,0.0045829252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99593216,0.00067629607,0.0000011360241,0.00027951875,0.0002092484,0.00001394694,0.000001410626,0.000005014108,0.0028812625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99670696,0.000420227,0.0002648563,0.00012077699,0.00086588174,0.0016212875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993552,0.00016032078,0.00019517526,0.00008222782,0.0001365868,0.000070472175],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037390213,0.00008992266,0.00018263943,0.000030142566,0.003950288,0.000027327955,0.00032889168,0.00002159883,0.00091733126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019521313,0.000060623366,0.00005856064,0.00028504143,0.00035953225,0.00007807848,0.00012761714,0.00070520124,0.0000020890602],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006544315,0.00019242619,0.029583916,0.000008843577,0.0008515932,0.000033167547,0.024438621,0.00024548682,0.00040486667,0.930424,0.00984189,0.0033207552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009830069,0.00047373137,0.012454899,0.000023774406,0.00009330988,0.0001884086,0.31227252,0.000012172406,0.00013265894,0.19220033,0.48068878,0.0004764015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.654665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97427523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7382237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00530019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014613248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211209076","doi":"10.7202/1085795ar","title":"Tracer la frontière entre la preuve du contexte législatif et social et la plaidoirie : proposition d’un cadre d’analyse pour l’application de la prohibition de l’expertise sur le droit dans le contentieux constitutionnel","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012555356694227958,"score_gpt":0.2510519063834525,"score_spread":0.2384965496892245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211209076","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59868693,0.0040883264,0.117125094,0.03921118,0.00033028342,0.0011516471,0.00065137976,0.00023586376,0.2385193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99271226,0.0011348584,0.0009924944,0.0004902225,0.0007298327,0.00028306647,0.00025295882,0.0000351639,0.003369122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99521816,0.00256647,0.00055176864,0.00061969884,0.00040350648,0.000640403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981774,0.0006115986,0.00035679477,0.00018650504,0.00045112587,0.00021653813],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018208813,0.00030209013,0.0005311233,0.00007340845,0.0016061871,0.0003158824,0.00024708707,0.0006639974,0.00008243559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050647726,0.00044238134,0.00038918704,0.00046364733,0.0023333295,0.00068772916,0.00010457275,0.00062287255,0.00004222221],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103128754,0.0011829984,0.012051985,0.00012012218,0.00033724637,0.0005019638,0.033544783,0.00035210344,0.008279474,0.931601,0.0015817997,0.010343435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008256081,0.00016046385,0.11575481,0.0019822773,0.001728135,0.002453716,0.07054644,0.006284806,0.009335586,0.68945444,0.09179417,0.002249066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019955602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019375578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39402536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014602725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036729476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211254543","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004550","title":"Nonconstitutional Amendments","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Democracy; Political science; Constitutional economics; Liberal democracy; Law; Constitutional amendment; Democratic legitimacy; Sovereignty; Phenomenon; Constitutional law; Constitutional review; Law and economics; Constitution; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.029800279208614836,"score_gpt":0.313601402395157,"score_spread":0.28380112318654216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211254543","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06547384,0.0040311217,0.0005459233,0.020125328,0.0019221682,0.00013688854,0.000023879787,0.000016132011,0.90772474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967264,0.0001220698,0.00026875336,0.00209566,0.0006221942,5.569795e-7,4.236044e-7,0.0000015829061,0.000162356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998916,0.000051029692,0.00024262942,0.00008551738,0.00038578646,0.00031908505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988968,0.000041680356,0.00012577727,0.00005475694,0.00030303907,0.0005779457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041574094,0.00007568069,0.00014397425,0.00008012642,0.0011355776,0.00008177513,0.0003157467,0.000052632437,0.00024285498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014468456,0.000071673785,0.00008482316,0.00017126904,0.0011135418,0.00034944987,0.000004927334,0.0001557288,0.00005152053],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004697079,0.00001109644,0.0014156626,4.4318122e-7,0.000013255865,0.00015437942,0.00090104016,0.000019944904,0.000027957269,0.9936681,0.002244805,0.0015386408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020201966,0.00009278779,0.010420251,0.000104595136,0.000024037301,0.000054965116,0.00050344,6.8472184e-7,0.00003798953,0.12149433,0.8669136,0.0001512815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05301742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1794064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93125254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002971263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037153391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9532886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213326079","doi":"10.1093/icon/moab127","title":"Judicial amendment of the constitution","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Interpretation (philosophy); Judicial interpretation; Constitutional amendment; Law; Political science; Judicial activism; Judicial review; Context (archaeology); Politics; Original intent; Extant taxon; Originalism; Invocation; Constitutional law; Amendment; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02444199024478361,"score_gpt":0.31829335709583545,"score_spread":0.29385136685105184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213326079","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030166134,0.0017860145,0.004827821,0.026033143,0.012881079,0.00015004099,0.00011730997,0.000016185586,0.92402226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99719006,0.00023108549,0.00032562247,0.0010357958,0.0010943533,0.0000017749909,0.0000032909645,0.0000014786652,0.00011653117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771327,0.00014542308,0.0005234176,0.00009845378,0.001379796,0.00013966368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967587,0.00017024299,0.00042139852,0.000074581374,0.0025045206,0.00007055188],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049695047,0.000084369174,0.00018748504,0.000057291873,0.0004911979,0.00004588466,0.00044770696,0.000060250502,0.00032934372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006308633,0.000065073014,0.0002601844,0.00019204967,0.005900217,0.0002678667,0.00010444312,0.0001690148,0.00001155776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004362514,0.00012085918,0.0031190007,0.0000013255134,0.00019943329,0.00005286178,0.00020672173,0.00017156525,0.0010175966,0.9937868,0.0008323256,0.0004478446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075978995,0.000022562946,0.0021302365,0.00021962608,0.000076430464,0.00024605286,0.00067716354,0.0000018715602,0.0051738666,0.17351149,0.817059,0.00012193023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008888518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001065162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9670239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002449498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00321751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99680513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214664901","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199264063.003.0014","title":"Judicial Review, Legislative Override, and Democracy","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Charter; Political science; Enforcement; Democracy; Law; Law and economics; Judicial review; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03563413281104954,"score_gpt":0.29984116942644423,"score_spread":0.2642070366153947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214664901","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000010141049,0.048502028,0.00002552803,0.008751132,0.00034166622,0.00033424792,0.000017956736,0.000041912597,0.94198453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00068237964,0.19527885,0.00008598166,0.008411934,0.0007327107,0.000007493374,0.000006264209,0.000012465658,0.7947819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988047,0.000035970217,0.00023479416,0.00027914307,0.00043383182,0.00021154775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994003,0.00011795768,0.00013469234,0.00008298843,0.00016271255,0.00010131132],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030767647,0.00020084747,0.00040082162,0.00004003198,0.00094720925,0.000026500766,0.00010104373,0.00017056089,0.0020427788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020664994,0.00017670447,0.00010700965,0.00003754405,0.0011629587,0.00010484441,0.000061405524,0.00020324746,0.00018240155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018943515,0.000002933397,0.000028781991,0.000013637212,0.000046158293,0.0000064621745,0.00015225155,9.9820205e-9,1.0013298e-7,0.89785683,0.098213926,0.0036769889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036297504,0.000008984286,0.000027932427,0.00036749747,0.0000605625,9.816664e-7,0.000031827145,2.4440782e-8,1.260293e-7,0.36582038,0.6334975,0.00014794579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026843478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004753333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5352835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000081203994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027467703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220711391","doi":"10.4324/9781003264262","title":"Constitutional Law and Precedent","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Universitetet i Oslo; European Commission","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.03092989175448381,"score_gpt":0.2873765030518673,"score_spread":0.2564466112973835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220711391","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000015829595,0.0019483909,0.000018567916,0.0012552096,0.00055981195,0.00017124959,0.000057757163,0.000061055034,0.9959264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0062610456,0.0010339378,0.000038043454,0.0017591898,0.0006491573,0.000033550365,0.000037030477,0.000002786771,0.99018526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905956,0.0000368555,0.000109884,0.00018638615,0.00046067048,0.00014664944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968374,0.000106318206,0.00004340667,0.000045867455,0.00005158165,0.0000691037],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019775935,0.00009702155,0.00014798877,0.000016351876,0.0019708883,0.00003988122,0.00010612464,0.00008632195,0.007774936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029417117,0.00009330174,0.000050935265,0.000030615072,0.0051768823,0.000052654537,0.00015595126,0.0001627409,0.00007491347],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023013838,0.0000071414156,0.000018132025,0.0000022149895,0.00003300308,0.000004737418,0.00024048913,4.3501865e-7,6.270148e-8,0.9379272,0.061387576,0.00037669385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040115487,0.0000074144555,0.000008024788,0.000008647341,0.000017050186,0.0000015440593,0.00023697516,5.6308828e-8,9.177681e-8,0.24426965,0.7553151,0.000095295436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043182434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009880091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6939275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026535476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00097479747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99932843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221053423","doi":"10.1111/phc3.12820","title":"Federalism: Contemporary political philosophy issues","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Politics; Doctrine; New Federalism; Political science; Political philosophy; Scrutiny; Democracy; Sociology; Law and economics; Subsidiarity; Normative; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Economics; European union","score_opus":0.10746257646545411,"score_gpt":0.3375189679486287,"score_spread":0.23005639148317458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221053423","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003079264,0.0014324329,0.000015721342,0.23401928,0.0007927447,0.00022310593,0.00007199488,0.00018915784,0.7601763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99083984,0.00002529249,0.000042226093,0.005942526,0.0027210186,0.000103566876,0.00002228842,0.000011504294,0.00029171983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771583,0.00036405478,0.00025813063,0.00030808753,0.00087498245,0.0004788967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999314,0.00013239944,0.000073632786,0.00015738656,0.00010178968,0.00022078924],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036916157,0.00016032747,0.00028721697,0.00008743768,0.003831022,0.000069163725,0.0004325433,0.000040023777,0.0005653728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006746673,0.00017018555,0.00015136751,0.00032756352,0.00086792227,0.00017365397,0.00031117935,0.00028201658,0.00014641734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033760898,0.0001485617,0.0018825262,0.0000038931935,0.00004323967,0.00003256157,0.0010603588,0.00000444395,0.000005731496,0.97832006,0.01840215,0.000062707644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019237444,0.000046364104,0.00044204463,0.0000063446073,0.00000701193,0.0000021658082,0.0011249273,0.000004293129,0.000004848718,0.6369704,0.36104113,0.00015805587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008769852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008499949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9877606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023484009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030242733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224004484","doi":"10.29173/psur255","title":"Canadian Constitution Needs to Be Amended for Canada to Fully Embrace Multiculturalism","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Undergraduate Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Multiculturalism; Neuroscience of multilingualism; Constitution; Charter; Political science; State (computer science); Hierarchy; Law; Perspective (graphical); Indigenous; Position (finance); Sociology; Law and economics; Linguistics; Business; Philosophy","score_opus":0.047314042297106805,"score_gpt":0.33762287653963174,"score_spread":0.29030883424252496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224004484","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030734604,0.0015918562,0.0001426278,0.9223898,0.00092309935,0.0018425663,0.00025334448,0.000043635588,0.06973961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9214712,0.00028660748,0.00024665718,0.07694149,0.00011736285,0.00033826486,0.000008342393,0.0000032608782,0.00058686244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99671805,0.00011920729,0.00027252204,0.00035827296,0.0010681615,0.0014637754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973138,0.00015891853,0.000040274852,0.00014155495,0.00036672462,0.0019787466],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013124454,0.00013939163,0.00026836735,0.00013267988,0.004808967,0.00009080691,0.00058377325,0.00001767366,0.00010905226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023942627,0.00012392775,0.00007353235,0.0020828585,0.00074605143,0.00014636983,0.00016770222,0.000111675945,0.000025224002],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018968942,0.000010217147,0.00003364591,0.000023077244,0.000005337223,0.0000034335162,0.000326209,0.00001782228,0.000024498986,0.9811847,0.017539375,0.0008297827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066440436,0.00004029834,0.0001591707,0.00010169512,0.000030571035,0.0000050624467,0.0033511657,0.000007860609,0.000016956408,0.012904269,0.9830823,0.00023419417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99218094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96828043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058105327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013460096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224591790","doi":"10.1017/cls.2021.28","title":"Public Support for Canadian Courts: Understanding the Roles of Institutional Trust and Partisanship","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; Western University; Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Political science; Public support; Supreme court; Politics; Government (linguistics); Public opinion; Law; Period (music); Public administration; Prime minister","score_opus":0.0683199592203731,"score_gpt":0.27430617837812965,"score_spread":0.20598621915775656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224591790","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69785094,0.0068596792,0.00063220685,0.11585165,0.0026387437,0.0010571884,0.0024184375,0.000016868727,0.17267427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960572,0.00022853074,0.000043519336,0.003161051,0.0002378583,0.00001727778,0.000012261402,0.00000790113,0.00023438498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987331,0.000104510844,0.00030534202,0.00013941484,0.00016015608,0.00055745285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982616,0.00024473245,0.0001930522,0.00006762134,0.00023227821,0.0010007557],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018824138,0.000107155225,0.00025576944,0.00007366185,0.0055384603,0.00010206045,0.00024557067,0.000074299045,0.00015309657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022625485,0.00010488851,0.00017702454,0.00017317472,0.0019348739,0.00021175135,0.000022061517,0.0002843558,1.2851339e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038622247,0.0000044111744,0.0017080202,0.000011361629,0.00010641579,0.000017151024,0.03657683,0.00002685947,0.0000018555546,0.95914143,0.001960859,0.00044095793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045986302,0.00012704986,0.0014746913,0.000032995482,0.000098364224,0.00011812395,0.2040249,0.000038616807,9.715257e-7,0.20465563,0.58876276,0.00020603658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.63520145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9949241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7544858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019170287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007927166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225257895","doi":"10.5944/rdp.113.2022.33579","title":"Poder Judicial como un (muy) mal regulador político: notas desde Brasil","year":2022,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Derecho Político","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.021252389130125494,"score_gpt":0.30454394146890046,"score_spread":0.28329155233877495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225257895","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64115334,0.0486532,0.0015924915,0.08791586,0.0058198087,0.003502646,0.0025210725,0.000986009,0.20785558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896458,0.0018500471,0.00037801202,0.0045598447,0.0018690286,0.00013737917,0.00004831345,0.000067070345,0.0014445022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934532,0.0013724864,0.00091167196,0.00092474715,0.0017387659,0.0015990991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976748,0.0005304571,0.000471421,0.00055487297,0.00024285528,0.0005255865],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016679231,0.000608983,0.0009496665,0.00023049208,0.005808631,0.0006817941,0.0011715123,0.00027465768,0.0033786108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006942145,0.00067372905,0.0005486123,0.0014326947,0.0015368782,0.00026596268,0.0009110863,0.0010038462,0.00046649342],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002349318,0.00075114437,0.013769475,0.00010450627,0.00049816637,0.0002543866,0.0023392257,0.000048255424,0.00044312325,0.93826336,0.012930755,0.030362684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015111241,0.0003456239,0.027770761,0.00026114166,0.0007479476,0.0001337764,0.006195168,0.00012827117,0.00020239466,0.049006388,0.9122794,0.001417971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01040123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034153607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8993487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013665749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016122744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230268328","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198861973.003.0013","title":"What’s Wrong with (Some) Human Rights Lawyers?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.040004054918333,"score_gpt":0.27608636065658076,"score_spread":0.23608230573824776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230268328","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000022566435,0.0008963121,0.0000077997365,0.004848023,0.0005401567,0.00021890536,0.000006191791,0.00014028704,0.99331975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05777148,0.0004597365,0.00003800957,0.0010843812,0.0020556594,0.000008909135,0.00001630502,0.000015647283,0.9385499],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987152,0.0000146586335,0.00016053,0.0003217577,0.0005752906,0.000212562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953187,0.000038663227,0.00008968064,0.000096996046,0.00010354596,0.00013923028],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008415726,0.00021196654,0.00029773513,0.000038910617,0.0017769827,0.00016013524,0.0002200152,0.00017337089,0.0019899004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000044263465,0.00015471062,0.00010032943,0.000030901912,0.0011751661,0.00036299147,0.00007095527,0.0002150718,0.0007042903],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055894684,0.000005026184,0.000007073039,0.000002886503,0.00009392709,0.0000343497,0.00062656024,1.5871808e-7,4.460714e-7,0.9910417,0.0079456875,0.00023658875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058455724,0.000031043186,0.000010427954,0.00008236113,0.000036265723,3.0658384e-7,0.00031833778,3.725909e-8,0.0000017164965,0.38491347,0.6143705,0.0001770269],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0078067644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06852197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60642487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009969682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015329396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99952257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230448376","doi":"10.25071/1920-7336.26034","title":"Thamotharem and Guideline 7 of the IRB: Rethinking the Scope of the Fettering of Discretion Doctrine","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Refuge Canada s Journal on Refuge","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Guideline; Discretion; Argument (complex analysis); Refugee; Consistency (knowledge bases); Political science; Scope (computer science); Law; Autonomy; Independence (probability theory); Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.02308554365463313,"score_gpt":0.25989629341360587,"score_spread":0.23681074975897273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230448376","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9900119,0.001914575,0.00001954919,0.006423228,0.0004182542,0.00012841426,0.000020620464,0.0000026692123,0.0010608395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99783814,0.0010510609,0.000032123597,0.00076585077,0.00018397933,0.0000010407398,2.6198987e-7,0.0000039879496,0.00012356046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820966,0.00021164944,0.0004416002,0.0000880498,0.000880978,0.000168057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989699,0.000100941965,0.0004950467,0.00015825003,0.0002279725,0.000047904006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007299593,0.00008842212,0.00019729785,0.000024099247,0.0012111622,0.000009742017,0.00038646694,0.000037745147,0.000038661998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029884506,0.000040269286,0.000095751595,0.00028687558,0.0008203917,0.000061581166,0.00008986514,0.00026714985,1.00718054e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016734163,0.00007976825,0.023227569,0.000052795727,0.000278114,0.000036415735,0.001371908,0.000623303,0.0049141985,0.9638881,0.002092894,0.0032675907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037782273,0.00006270569,0.073663086,0.00061854045,0.000058608435,0.00007372973,0.0001239742,0.000013705522,0.0041948464,0.0057414426,0.9149305,0.00014099025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024610529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062428128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95814663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014795175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008901805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98188466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231274499","doi":"10.22215/etd/2007-06275","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada: reaffirming the norm through the veil of constitutional neutrality","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Neutrality; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Norm (philosophy); Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03416628275344943,"score_gpt":0.3253725926709973,"score_spread":0.29120630991754787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231274499","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040866513,0.0025592416,0.000046512712,0.011224204,0.0021427607,0.00050953164,0.00008389253,0.000015187115,0.94255215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945086,0.00058387686,0.000009365862,0.00023498536,0.00032011812,0.000015925116,0.000027563156,0.0000029375103,0.004296581],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796087,0.00012071546,0.0004348349,0.00014624657,0.001047879,0.00028948515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99769616,0.0011582079,0.00033484184,0.00017674807,0.0006036541,0.000030414525],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011744583,0.00013831796,0.0002267055,0.000011266861,0.0032132545,0.000024005662,0.0005589144,0.00011153776,0.000074180534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042142163,0.000063851876,0.00012720286,0.00026289857,0.004326366,0.00005992378,0.000033375258,0.00023805891,0.0000014561813],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003596331,0.000013963499,0.00045636485,0.000008292309,0.00010396068,7.635985e-7,0.003924471,0.000015004535,0.000008304895,0.9852926,0.00966694,0.00047338443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017985755,0.00002316406,0.04295043,0.00012967458,0.00018312843,0.0000015157065,0.1974104,0.000003450712,0.00060330116,0.051053822,0.707178,0.00028324575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9230295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9928097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95364213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016444104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005982605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231389143","doi":"10.5040/9781509947201","title":"The Constitution of Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Democracy; Federalism; Ideal (ethics); Context (archaeology); Political science; Indigenous; Law; CLARITY; Simplicity; Government (linguistics); Human rights; Constitutional law; Rule of law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Epistemology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024564448543977994,"score_gpt":0.23767656626675665,"score_spread":0.21311211772277866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231389143","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000011110945,0.0016404851,0.000008159645,0.003486581,0.0018997161,0.00014238768,0.000058944504,0.000027207741,0.99272543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019762835,0.000101904676,0.000012538028,0.00045812654,0.0011116446,0.00001552616,0.000030944237,0.000006096792,0.97850037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827546,0.000095660216,0.00026512457,0.0001808718,0.00089053664,0.00029233217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851376,0.00042859494,0.00021594217,0.00016208173,0.00059193745,0.000087701905],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007911794,0.00012109302,0.00022285171,0.000026403868,0.0022081814,0.00058417907,0.00041564013,0.00017055841,0.000060519607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013628551,0.00009526184,0.0000909215,0.000045573146,0.001536228,0.00017792548,0.00013111901,0.00034103345,0.0000025193112],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014285428,0.0000012353659,0.0000072662556,0.0000039735473,0.00003475332,0.000006351543,0.00024264508,3.2037372e-7,9.224473e-7,0.6086975,0.38928968,0.0017139164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004247279,0.0000025663146,0.00002147818,0.00011996401,0.000022259432,8.7815874e-7,0.00074037747,1.7992855e-7,0.000009479707,0.037802186,0.9611333,0.00010485434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67167413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9733871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5718436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005571935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030881105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231518129","doi":"10.4000/cal.7992","title":"Luís R. Cardoso de Oliveira, Droit légal et insulte morale. Dilemmes de la citoyenneté au Brésil, au Québec et aux États-Unis","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers des Amériques latines","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.021691957423671675,"score_gpt":0.3138811932197139,"score_spread":0.2921892357960422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231518129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79981357,0.015057548,0.0007702916,0.03079507,0.0005369774,0.0002749425,0.00013400873,0.0002189332,0.15239863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9702948,0.007464438,0.0024127022,0.003543807,0.0024195232,0.000070226866,0.000019041603,0.00004587585,0.013729597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960594,0.0010994758,0.0005433127,0.00053680665,0.0005158657,0.0012451067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976467,0.001033168,0.00025277078,0.00023711268,0.00035760962,0.00047263823],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001258229,0.000502644,0.00060377514,0.00012624348,0.0034877607,0.00024734606,0.00049806345,0.0004777534,0.00013757721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011350146,0.000521773,0.00034309967,0.0006184987,0.01498548,0.00082863896,0.0001721214,0.00069197605,0.00008314536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081986516,0.0002675537,0.13431478,0.000089811685,0.00034271128,0.00009257686,0.18563052,0.00089198136,0.00019122128,0.6415769,0.008392057,0.028127909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010402387,0.00033434076,0.12215662,0.0006351361,0.00031050836,0.000083048275,0.027210731,0.00066221174,0.00043951822,0.1470716,0.6986124,0.0014436597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6544637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70517606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6902203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034573856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053139227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231860877","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190682910.001.0001","title":"Extending Rights' Reach","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Political science; Jurisprudence; Fundamental rights; Law; Normative; Reservation of rights; Constitutional law; Human rights; Law and economics; Politics; Democracy; Right to property; Sociology","score_opus":0.03373768345462289,"score_gpt":0.2520294103406219,"score_spread":0.218291726885999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231860877","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000031344764,0.00013693831,0.00007868389,0.000040941584,0.00054046157,0.0002278897,0.000056134235,0.00015006741,0.9987375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008196269,0.00029852497,0.000085771906,0.00003761991,0.0010704248,7.134849e-7,0.000015496993,0.00000871061,0.9976631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987091,0.00009435823,0.00010778492,0.0003279024,0.00042595415,0.0003349137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992961,0.00009172129,0.00013296187,0.00017307322,0.00017477061,0.0001313223],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019085966,0.0001909555,0.00025865014,0.00009606888,0.0021976372,0.000048605776,0.0005045885,0.0003129216,0.00009174291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019612142,0.00020537563,0.00015589267,0.000019285562,0.0016162783,0.000098282144,0.00026399965,0.00024390822,0.000008843029],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021503387,0.00000652036,0.0000042364322,0.0000056306144,0.00008058856,0.000047913723,0.00093617255,8.268542e-8,4.2954093e-7,0.92352194,0.074183635,0.0011913584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012554525,0.000019994492,0.0000074369345,0.000092625436,0.00010723618,6.001108e-7,0.00021791738,4.4446787e-7,0.0000033440583,0.031016784,0.9681587,0.0002493252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045956266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002584317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89397514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005237661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005165993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99910134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232052430","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2776802","title":"Proportionality and Absolute Rights","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Proportionality (law); Computer science; Internet privacy; Political science; World Wide Web; Computer security; Law","score_opus":0.012972696457804014,"score_gpt":0.27573531814226365,"score_spread":0.26276262168445963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232052430","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83256257,0.0080290735,0.004850306,0.045852624,0.0005948329,0.00021598942,0.0000058603164,0.000083630825,0.10780509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99226314,0.0044402867,0.00001420317,0.000057243535,0.00054151803,0.0000023976227,1.2258677e-7,0.0000017766167,0.0026793154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985439,0.00006265886,0.000117855416,0.00009561015,0.0002620818,0.00091784634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970907,0.000040714072,0.00006122618,0.000030493542,0.000090153066,0.000068353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012800661,0.000052860312,0.00007337989,0.000023818548,0.0011958787,0.00002424389,0.00008456981,0.00003287922,0.00006067806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008405153,0.000030638836,0.00003713883,0.00006468334,0.0004591646,0.00017414025,0.00001854758,0.00021653072,0.000033516822],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000854171,0.000011289177,0.0033838775,1.9496161e-7,0.000034821325,0.0000011444029,0.0001284292,2.4103999e-8,0.000027394242,0.98315406,0.00011273983,0.013137489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015418109,0.000028018492,0.007807088,0.000008984992,0.0000086067375,0.000026540769,0.0004114373,6.831474e-8,0.000004946665,0.9262221,0.06526874,0.0000593017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021612425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025574636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15970054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004173008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015031209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9922061},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232172700","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.555","title":"THE PARADOX OF RULE OF LAW REFORMS: HOW EARLY REFORMS CAN CREATE OBSTACLES TO FUTURE ONES","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rule of law; Politics; Law reform; Face (sociological concept); Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Path dependence; Political economy; Sociology; Economics; Social science; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.010629426809805146,"score_gpt":0.22601544636713128,"score_spread":0.21538601955732614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232172700","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63396114,0.0006306213,0.000020622747,0.0067183464,0.00056723703,0.00010480508,0.000039917388,0.000010021445,0.3579473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982989,0.000666661,0.00030700816,0.00002795097,0.00023165159,6.11074e-8,3.8186508e-7,0.0000019180372,0.00046548064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923646,0.00004071138,0.000113322676,0.000071497176,0.0003626508,0.00017534125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923235,0.000039919843,0.00019567506,0.0000954194,0.00032420256,0.00011245047],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032807142,0.000065340646,0.00016943864,0.0000107032465,0.0017832115,0.000027036422,0.00039480423,0.00006530956,0.0000751905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023513878,0.00004401035,0.00011137643,0.00003890199,0.0012113337,0.00038363464,0.00007065185,0.00012921126,0.0000010494754],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000092755894,0.0000290156,0.0011408937,0.0000029099517,0.000068052694,0.0000040370783,0.014277981,0.0000013059773,0.0005067118,0.9808009,0.00017103068,0.002904401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052033743,0.0002436681,0.055072166,0.00007312382,0.00007599143,0.000006027239,0.17783885,5.3393273e-7,0.0006002549,0.029304655,0.73607683,0.00018755619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5258366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9030507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95149624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012837826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013600709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232711572","doi":"10.4324/9781315184555-21","title":"Law, Convention, Prerogative: Reflections Prompted by the Canadian Constitutional Case","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Convention; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.05836138516896253,"score_gpt":0.3227974918024485,"score_spread":0.26443610663348593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232711572","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000009652165,0.00161307,0.00040823693,0.005455823,0.0019402294,0.0010035101,0.0027339328,0.00015064683,0.9866849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6786881,0.00016501684,0.00015725364,0.0046546683,0.0027287742,0.0002062218,0.0008465101,0.000023259721,0.3125302],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99707586,0.00013660407,0.0005476341,0.0006368344,0.0009747819,0.00062827516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972215,0.00028545165,0.0002736806,0.00029076764,0.0014414607,0.00048712944],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068400695,0.00045217876,0.00040075558,0.00011755136,0.016805464,0.00028803173,0.00042543447,0.0005867243,0.0076410314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001769898,0.0003945377,0.00029169949,0.00014877411,0.09948501,0.00031630584,0.000104407234,0.00065600924,0.0016056753],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012318221,0.000026539268,0.000009344166,0.0000053099875,0.00029093673,0.00021991138,0.00026936538,0.0000029991797,0.0000020350735,0.9408955,0.058224093,0.000041655032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017680327,0.00002087047,0.0000016148961,0.00009418569,0.00012609745,0.00047673762,0.00012867308,9.1683324e-7,0.0000044655144,0.32876566,0.669885,0.00031901812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3258403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9032998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67867845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014869997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008459552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233044663","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.1.41","title":"DEFERENCE, DEFIANCE, AND DOCTRINE: DEFINING THE LIMITS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Political science; Judicial review; Law; Statute; Standard of review; Doctrine; Legitimacy; Law and economics; Judicial deference; Substantive due process; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Separation of powers; Legislature; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.01872079232334788,"score_gpt":0.26243890550361487,"score_spread":0.24371811318026698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233044663","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050796535,0.040119432,0.00004139621,0.0025352712,0.0003785087,0.000108078966,0.000008869246,0.000008840717,0.90600306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95908576,0.04032633,0.00031576285,0.000108885266,0.000093924275,3.766591e-8,2.2165995e-7,9.25982e-7,0.000068127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994504,0.000059280315,0.0000994486,0.00005812648,0.00022287166,0.00010988331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994655,0.0000892615,0.00014942586,0.00004707207,0.00018925744,0.000059461116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004391979,0.000044802087,0.00014386821,0.0000068586974,0.0012373527,0.000009329463,0.00020123862,0.000034753863,0.0002962538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000098849676,0.000036068035,0.000061988125,0.000040586532,0.001027653,0.00018836833,0.00004425711,0.00013887105,0.0000022026618],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014051142,0.000013281147,0.003395141,0.000010498843,0.000026207084,0.0000027832448,0.0011634221,2.0334095e-7,0.000028551183,0.98655236,0.0010121883,0.007781309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047397034,0.00008087798,0.033477306,0.0005958886,0.00020485054,0.000025835529,0.0086556,9.543232e-7,0.000020935564,0.016251799,0.9400543,0.00015770897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07444991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47929397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97030056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028192499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012735616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9516842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234308802","doi":"10.3138/9781487513078-010","title":"8. The Impact of Value Change in the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Value (mathematics); Law; Political science; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04862266160747398,"score_gpt":0.2639433514920475,"score_spread":0.21532068988457354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234308802","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003093103,0.0023019346,5.7554263e-7,0.0001209578,0.0000960165,0.0002562023,0.0001356129,0.0000022974452,0.9967771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75473195,0.0022707153,0.000005287314,0.0000129119435,0.00014471947,5.327157e-7,0.0000023804864,0.000004851233,0.24282664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992192,0.000051531322,0.00010289941,0.00009021846,0.00040067057,0.00013548869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991746,0.00013996342,0.00029805995,0.00020233607,0.00015508335,0.000029945202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027784542,0.00009206056,0.00022879297,0.0000066067196,0.00059157907,0.0000063208367,0.00072757754,0.000085455365,0.000044682653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026002837,0.00006470321,0.00013296863,6.591601e-7,0.0012283975,0.000051026112,0.0001167967,0.00008028003,1.1445595e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069117705,0.0000094923425,0.00019810356,0.000011778839,0.00019345243,0.000009006299,0.028028054,0.000002807682,0.0000021779788,0.9647662,0.0040855077,0.002624327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002096774,0.000059181184,0.00873283,0.00017672555,0.000086420645,2.5680646e-7,0.0017933032,0.0000033536178,0.0000043508544,0.0064273644,0.98236984,0.00013671162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.999367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99859214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9782843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032039164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008785034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4550008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234326012","doi":"10.1332/policypress/9781529200621.003.0003","title":"Towards a Written Constitution","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Policy Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Statute; Law; Political science; CITES","score_opus":0.09530761414240706,"score_gpt":0.3286729689085661,"score_spread":0.23336535476615905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234326012","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[8.257148e-7,0.0010570697,0.000061548155,0.003205388,0.00032870306,0.00037193784,0.00015001878,0.0002030333,0.99462146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.042267904,0.0008340273,0.000080725324,0.0027586157,0.0066797337,0.000056072866,0.000018756631,0.000025669939,0.9472785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849,0.00003738042,0.000260741,0.00033582587,0.00055811956,0.00031795143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992996,0.00004788278,0.00014603046,0.00014509987,0.00014470977,0.00021670791],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012695244,0.00025906015,0.00036443985,0.00008344731,0.0007619221,0.00008599626,0.0003218953,0.00030260617,0.00007509587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016945122,0.00025843678,0.00019218295,0.00001271567,0.002035772,0.000049310052,0.00019758269,0.00030770482,0.00017290626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000123811915,0.0000032863768,0.0000014154168,0.000011312592,0.000095035975,0.000018316177,0.0013499863,3.2213006e-7,0.0000022423276,0.9820103,0.006278765,0.010216621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008323501,0.000012313625,0.000004802382,0.000060020837,0.00005220835,0.0000013148339,0.000026645861,4.1486618e-7,0.000008865525,0.2981971,0.701353,0.00020009944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050380222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017733987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6950742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020901892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015374006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235004248","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511618246","title":"The Constitution of Law","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":250,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Constitution; Law; Political science; Legislature; Rule of law; Common law; Politics","score_opus":0.024730415088551644,"score_gpt":0.22784518936072307,"score_spread":0.20311477427217142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235004248","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000012048578,0.0004441281,0.00006154687,0.00006115741,0.0003571183,0.00024553182,0.00013760304,0.000048024987,0.99863285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007954546,0.00017412366,0.000006494827,0.000030270523,0.00026622077,5.80936e-7,0.000015090132,0.000003519659,0.99154913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990704,0.00009010779,0.00013021524,0.00016456026,0.0003432007,0.00020150884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920356,0.00018155276,0.00017408458,0.00014563481,0.00024414944,0.000050999675],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018559786,0.00012335392,0.00019676982,0.000029564146,0.0019108952,0.000028449762,0.0003663047,0.00018027601,7.4167207e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021597543,0.000112436115,0.0001408971,0.00001239046,0.0056700925,0.000049345515,0.00013476048,0.00017495571,0.0000052419045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015766793,0.000004523652,0.0000018992685,0.0000063519506,0.000046634963,0.000012557527,0.00005677622,8.3356565e-7,0.0000012236628,0.8262815,0.1733766,0.0001953594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011929084,0.000008670631,0.000010705232,0.0000584138,0.000093001436,4.831138e-7,0.000120568955,4.0198262e-7,0.00001577079,0.000625961,0.9988239,0.00012282183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028577521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013939767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8256555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028832981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000847341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99938846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235365193","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511994760.014","title":"CANADA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.03581690914882618,"score_gpt":0.2011748571998509,"score_spread":0.16535794805102472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235365193","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000010300152,0.0002338377,0.000017415989,0.000078522025,0.0004373453,0.00016024374,0.00020983792,0.000054072356,0.99879843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0063955924,0.0002886602,0.000006113046,0.0001615727,0.00026760038,2.5863903e-7,0.000007547475,0.000008838861,0.99286383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991039,0.000024514726,0.00008484495,0.00023007457,0.00032832762,0.00022830763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941957,0.00003936409,0.0000940713,0.00013715713,0.00016120441,0.00014862517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006246454,0.00016203329,0.00020717371,0.00003879121,0.00081849284,0.0000141271175,0.00034450306,0.00016874305,0.000027425938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012157014,0.00019404569,0.00009037294,0.0000048786383,0.00072495686,0.000038359154,0.00016387677,0.0002014226,0.000013949399],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011004955,0.0000015483487,0.0000025697877,0.0000033888182,0.00006350804,0.00013419957,0.000077476325,4.501775e-8,1.9622686e-7,0.85015,0.14898445,0.0005716079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007756848,0.0000059558038,0.000021700527,0.00003866852,0.00007903929,7.0780413e-7,0.00010922999,6.725249e-8,0.0000041272447,0.00024856557,0.9991877,0.00022668409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.970919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6933543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8502032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047737118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023221984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79129535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235533457","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226474.003.0008","title":"7 Conclusions","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legalism (Western philosophy); Law; Judicial discretion; Discretion; Political science; Rule of law; Ideology; Democracy; Legal formalism; Sociology; Public law; Judicial review; Politics; Black letter law; Private law","score_opus":0.03658649568496556,"score_gpt":0.2598197432002938,"score_spread":0.22323324751532822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235533457","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000010921377,0.0001750798,0.00014211258,0.000084920386,0.00038772964,0.00024060925,0.00007420047,0.00012875047,0.9987557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00051597494,0.0006301877,0.00005204439,0.00013420012,0.00048014327,3.3949496e-7,0.000015011459,0.000008072702,0.998164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889755,0.000051732553,0.000099041834,0.00023140143,0.00041482085,0.00030545666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993289,0.0001289873,0.00010151248,0.0001296622,0.00016159001,0.00014931947],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018119175,0.00015458853,0.00022774261,0.00009226167,0.0017426559,0.000025329698,0.0004053989,0.00032686282,0.00006872778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022871367,0.00017881235,0.0001498279,0.000018518971,0.0014016454,0.000054413165,0.00034289347,0.00027862494,0.0000043656164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018137129,0.0000068436093,0.0000060893135,0.000004201677,0.00006058937,0.000076117634,0.0009460713,3.4456397e-7,3.3409748e-7,0.9540399,0.041932754,0.0029086291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013354036,0.000013069863,0.0000081337075,0.000055271557,0.000085616106,4.971271e-7,0.0006147614,2.3299525e-7,0.0000013954923,0.009073471,0.9898066,0.00020744493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003087424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026299052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94787383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046740845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009376616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235854323","doi":"10.21991/c9kq27","title":"Introduction","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.01920544657048155,"score_gpt":0.26909396137106384,"score_spread":0.2498885148005823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235854323","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038181706,0.0014016436,0.18684623,0.2676497,0.008275573,0.0008457035,0.00027655435,0.0008220925,0.53006434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99227065,0.00047542233,0.0005190868,0.0012476214,0.002510907,0.00010769728,0.000025756292,0.000008481764,0.0028343785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99688035,0.00013942401,0.00052132993,0.0006307043,0.0008476799,0.0009805354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983247,0.00027359533,0.00016685695,0.0002980133,0.00059712736,0.00033972578],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058637175,0.00030582992,0.00032165428,0.00023775925,0.0041520675,0.00009775651,0.00039313833,0.00022124992,0.0022880503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015297098,0.00023339663,0.00024475492,0.00055390695,0.017848317,0.0011560093,0.00015047954,0.00016876434,0.002217978],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048777612,0.00008126184,0.010619925,0.000002347145,0.000069917616,0.000012466123,0.000076576434,0.000016275833,0.00048601738,0.9340312,0.047700025,0.006855243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073193735,0.000028660332,0.0005660502,0.00007036349,0.00003409985,0.00004882789,0.0014302935,0.000002712192,0.00021294097,0.14899623,0.8474991,0.00037879669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006766635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013581285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9884525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062647794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002261745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99862397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236400975","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-9991.2006.00056.x","title":"Judicial Review","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Judicial review; Legislature; Law; Rationality; Political science; Judicial activism; Judicial discretion; Adversary; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Supreme court","score_opus":0.06863262569889937,"score_gpt":0.35032927826896393,"score_spread":0.28169665257006454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236400975","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005750702,0.01227016,0.00032119735,0.037088446,0.0005947596,0.00018907485,0.0000032726646,0.0000988312,0.9488592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880498,0.0041684015,0.00007264165,0.0053356434,0.0022991165,0.0000065127338,0.0000021701205,0.0000034998473,0.00006222988],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989673,0.000047140293,0.00018325725,0.00013485114,0.00039856852,0.0002688846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995468,0.00009943697,0.000053675976,0.00008034497,0.0001138985,0.000105827065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076459267,0.00007605842,0.00017115563,0.000033744036,0.0007311891,0.000012407016,0.00018209222,0.000032609572,0.00016688637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014715227,0.00007177414,0.000080864054,0.00029947323,0.000457789,0.000078792444,0.000039599257,0.000090613925,0.00035613382],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061655946,0.000031091426,0.00066851074,0.000015012548,0.000013422268,0.000008309025,0.00020438775,9.120898e-8,0.000003912469,0.9845997,0.009895919,0.0045534647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007721256,0.000011064343,0.0034012913,0.0002111186,0.000018942426,7.1126937e-7,0.000071782626,1.8288343e-7,0.0000072808316,0.37113264,0.62495756,0.000110216075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001514901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00092831283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98747474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000653466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008504626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56237894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236495455","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.2.237","title":"THE EVERYDAY PROBLEM OF EMERGENCIES","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Principle of legality; Mistake; Rule of law; Politics; Law; Empirical research; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012930951744914413,"score_gpt":0.2337491872356998,"score_spread":0.2208182354907854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236495455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014370302,0.0036046375,0.00013503239,0.0035257323,0.00016991285,0.00005603723,0.000002864655,0.000007791148,0.9781277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956146,0.003234753,0.0002814278,0.000021507372,0.00007711428,6.8300303e-9,7.2002074e-8,4.2764677e-7,0.0007701316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949586,0.00005371208,0.000075642725,0.000034646375,0.00023567808,0.00010442757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996031,0.00003400282,0.0001016705,0.000031172665,0.0001890001,0.00004103796],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003042945,0.000029806988,0.00007217146,0.000004057783,0.0019585511,0.0000079982365,0.00020615742,0.000021108108,0.00023162091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015581008,0.000023489143,0.000071279195,0.000024732262,0.0005852656,0.0001992419,0.000018358793,0.00004202807,0.0000016238539],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002668824,0.000025790974,0.00043844865,5.75906e-7,0.000031054442,0.0000022849467,0.00627246,0.000005575729,0.0000638534,0.98211074,0.0029133162,0.008109218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017312395,0.00010074949,0.012381959,0.000024232391,0.000029916688,0.0000019637305,0.044620782,0.0000010217808,0.000028187293,0.045105543,0.8974697,0.00006282982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11366574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32103515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98124427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000092309994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000093625866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237008288","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197509616.001.0001","title":"The Machinery of Government","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Business; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0216619106111287,"score_gpt":0.26067034841342057,"score_spread":0.23900843780229186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237008288","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[8.875966e-7,0.0013212931,0.000014408746,0.0067319702,0.00025717582,0.000083791,0.000026681766,0.000012705343,0.9915511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0048367297,0.0018430991,0.0000103755465,0.00034227024,0.0005766851,0.0000038277562,0.0000012813032,0.0000024876306,0.99238324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991406,0.000020982045,0.00010607606,0.00007100743,0.000580733,0.000080576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996623,0.00017184988,0.000068366455,0.000044186767,0.000024797024,0.00002852904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013705596,0.000054514254,0.000106762374,0.000002109487,0.00049698935,0.000012117964,0.00017259471,0.00004779207,0.00015132193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009541106,0.00003202399,0.000074145246,0.000024081717,0.0006724526,0.0000111944,0.0000728461,0.00007877673,0.000058739446],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024556498,0.0000018714794,0.000020848374,0.0000012879063,0.000028715975,5.4465534e-7,0.00017383618,7.6856935e-8,2.6037114e-7,0.7787939,0.21787293,0.0031032893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013903738,0.000006438759,0.00003846412,0.000008955471,0.000012222438,2.2497664e-8,0.00027539124,2.0883007e-7,9.1279963e-7,0.12570484,0.87390184,0.00003677745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014501555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056768507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6560289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011891146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036712058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38224903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237056658","doi":"10.1332/policypress/9781529200621.003.0005","title":"The Westminster Model as a Constitutional Archetype","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Policy Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Archetype; Character (mathematics); Democracy; Variety (cybernetics); Political science; Identity (music); Law; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics; Politics; Theology","score_opus":0.12008046685561369,"score_gpt":0.33977199409574405,"score_spread":0.21969152724013036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237056658","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000012614194,0.0011203653,0.00015414924,0.0049652914,0.00023059652,0.00035846914,0.00011358071,0.00009551743,0.99296075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023721924,0.00085074693,0.00006567526,0.0031258676,0.0026892992,0.000060408278,0.000008066382,0.000018571372,0.9694594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983634,0.000038970236,0.00026889128,0.00030571508,0.00066636223,0.000356656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991278,0.00019243274,0.00014267262,0.00017857496,0.00015931702,0.00019920299],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017578159,0.0002503611,0.000254212,0.000042777498,0.0018897477,0.00013005498,0.0004692928,0.00022291312,0.00002668404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019200366,0.00019170906,0.00019467175,0.000010144137,0.0065387073,0.00004002122,0.0002645045,0.00038718598,0.00023573262],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027027243,0.000003000565,8.282427e-7,0.0000043035943,0.000104674524,0.00000770222,0.0010866129,0.000016734295,0.0000013558313,0.99040556,0.005570201,0.0027720174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005871982,0.000009019493,4.939729e-7,0.00002834162,0.000028473974,0.0000016389125,0.000018472583,0.000021313053,0.0000022547804,0.42683634,0.5728619,0.00013299874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069515225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014419378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56729174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001549207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002626153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237089063","doi":"10.22215/etd/2014-10439","title":"The State of Democratization in Post-Soviet Russia: The Role of the European Court of Human Rights and the Growth of Rule of Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Democratization; Rule of law; Political science; Democracy; Law; Human rights; Due process; State (computer science); Law and economics; Comparative law; Sociology; Municipal law; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.00568530798845999,"score_gpt":0.2443965703933674,"score_spread":0.23871126240490742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237089063","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46355847,0.0007981036,0.0000037689008,0.000824153,0.00010002893,0.00043787446,0.000036614605,0.0000034791735,0.5342375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99918926,0.000217112,0.00000395436,0.000020691617,0.00003014801,0.0000052715104,0.0000127594885,0.000004353787,0.0005164657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981656,0.00068803795,0.0005022303,0.00009749778,0.00044778685,0.000098844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983009,0.00036393665,0.00072609726,0.00014383387,0.00045361274,0.000011585209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001440767,0.000098544835,0.00028967808,0.000025688496,0.00066329725,0.000009984174,0.00041157528,0.000044359207,0.000010930002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001222234,0.000038312624,0.000095308314,0.00018662676,0.0024920898,0.00004420902,0.000051807117,0.000100311794,3.5060933e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055495475,0.000032199623,0.00091395766,0.000024044382,0.00006418936,3.5653823e-8,0.011852587,0.0000045813317,0.0005779231,0.9858682,0.00003893615,0.0005678436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051585084,0.000070943395,0.12615266,0.00023051743,0.00014688302,1.16866055e-7,0.014142822,0.000014286614,0.008860598,0.8489844,0.00077137636,0.00010951972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06409252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19119057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53563076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000075978437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000100824574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94213974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237458397","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198714514.003.0004","title":"3 Engaging the Constitutive Laws of Others: Necessities, Ideas, Interests","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Writ; LEAPS; Ideology; Politics; Political science; Intellectual history; Law; Comparative politics; Constitutional law; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.031677058750234334,"score_gpt":0.24972538645747158,"score_spread":0.21804832770723725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237458397","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007536558,0.00037447066,0.00032072424,0.00012052651,0.00034328282,0.0003043614,0.00009972311,0.000059932074,0.9983016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04342929,0.00035056914,0.000037722544,0.00014777822,0.00036751665,0.0000014411265,0.000009242078,0.000010280385,0.95564616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986747,0.00026821747,0.0001653808,0.00024282081,0.000385794,0.00026310995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883276,0.00040279888,0.00028910016,0.00020208198,0.00019757825,0.00007566666],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036301024,0.00019835887,0.00034522882,0.00007023619,0.001303923,0.00003927525,0.0007034332,0.00020440618,0.00003040188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054946424,0.00017227505,0.00017534546,0.000023083005,0.00425859,0.000089273475,0.0003072553,0.00036966352,0.000001352406],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037490317,0.0000069009184,0.000027194274,0.00002066655,0.0001659807,0.000011549332,0.0046732896,0.0000031302309,7.0281004e-7,0.9815947,0.010328838,0.003129548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018704317,0.00001784555,0.000012333614,0.00028539338,0.00014018708,6.4628165e-7,0.004509074,0.000001731407,0.0000071551813,0.015923385,0.97872686,0.00018833773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005615419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051088394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96839803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002818255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010107656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237547815","doi":"10.1007/978-0-387-49896-6","title":"Approval Voting","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Pennsylvania State University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Voting; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.044200390645726256,"score_gpt":0.30810032221328826,"score_spread":0.263899931567562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237547815","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000021457054,0.00060281606,0.00038176883,0.0004062183,0.00050695374,0.00010747915,0.0000025846548,0.000101493286,0.99788857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025202665,0.0000890281,0.00014431751,0.00038592832,0.0024722544,0.0000022116944,0.0000055185365,0.000005114909,0.99437535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991056,0.000013368167,0.000119515105,0.00014256078,0.0004009153,0.00021808693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996735,0.00009417558,0.000051903666,0.000037044774,0.00008749041,0.000055915752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003936442,0.000088680674,0.00013829202,0.000041806066,0.0006850327,0.000026076355,0.00013293813,0.00017953846,0.00060376665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007819461,0.00007936362,0.000080458725,0.00005177348,0.0006767127,0.00003313048,0.000048024645,0.00015233502,0.00052174943],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.508804e-7,0.0000033765496,0.000025944762,0.0000017094583,0.000016416305,0.000004671563,0.0002776207,9.410744e-8,5.766026e-8,0.9138936,0.07910487,0.006670683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020938207,0.0000033481492,0.000021024482,0.000021104439,0.000011330646,2.2483665e-7,0.00028552336,1.9206617e-7,2.7392701e-7,0.084385775,0.91514516,0.0001051088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031004362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009113549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83604026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017679727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074262696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67062074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237813369","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv6cfpf3.4","title":"The Rule of Law in the Canadian Constitution","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Rule of law; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03792333151521577,"score_gpt":0.22821491347310258,"score_spread":0.1902915819578868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237813369","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004560663,0.0003333683,0.0000070818305,0.0001652862,0.00011427432,0.00020777201,0.000027420772,0.00000536117,0.99909383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3243043,0.0007004729,0.000060204697,0.00038450034,0.00026337834,9.121824e-7,0.000013754002,0.0000073344618,0.67426515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993354,0.000052759537,0.00009557816,0.000096116586,0.00028535692,0.00013480053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994812,0.00010954924,0.000102310245,0.00011519101,0.00014820059,0.000043569882],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003066674,0.000073441595,0.00013333689,0.00003492482,0.0013349502,0.000012336056,0.00039603852,0.00014002332,0.00004773636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014427196,0.00005701031,0.00007387724,0.0000066681437,0.0066452706,0.000028076694,0.00005398716,0.00013747411,0.000005900552],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014312722,0.0000021870428,0.000007792417,0.0000031302088,0.000028452168,0.0000097802795,0.0049511367,2.2001817e-7,3.665744e-7,0.9937516,0.00045653348,0.0007744981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007493928,0.000011486457,0.0000481207,0.00005532139,0.000035119105,3.697798e-7,0.0005302669,6.7231065e-7,0.0000030125243,0.06022267,0.9389581,0.000059896112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89590234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98095965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9385016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000107373504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000708736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238224044","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198747369.013.40","title":"Deliberative Constitutionalism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Constitutional theory; Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Political science; Polity; Constitution; Law and economics; Normative; Democracy; Separation of powers; Legislature; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.050802376600789075,"score_gpt":0.27248719298953333,"score_spread":0.22168481638874427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238224044","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001007324,0.00068077777,0.00025792042,0.0001716274,0.001433145,0.00031014474,0.0005043028,0.00012926415,0.9964121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0030456085,0.024003003,0.00018221277,0.00018185537,0.0018641946,0.0000033056751,0.00010372509,0.000009742754,0.9706063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983441,0.00020170072,0.0001414891,0.00037571043,0.00055157614,0.00038538795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894774,0.00012235783,0.0001553539,0.00015385853,0.0004560566,0.00016461569],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015205334,0.00023427473,0.0003250859,0.00009794655,0.0022536854,0.00007353877,0.0004998204,0.0004058637,0.00012813028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006530946,0.00024979975,0.00016489545,0.000048603637,0.003325206,0.00012838413,0.00028778528,0.0003311535,0.000007248996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030103289,0.000020826214,0.000010614983,0.000009593537,0.0001338618,0.00003205139,0.0010436693,3.0571923e-7,3.8241925e-8,0.7948,0.19926573,0.0046532326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002234368,0.000027034723,0.000014678741,0.00017260239,0.00012688474,0.0000012942335,0.0015022862,7.2790556e-7,0.0000027783021,0.0038335857,0.99379975,0.00029495245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077457908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002847486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.794534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039478764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016763952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238345167","doi":"10.22215/etd/2007-07597","title":"Canada's accommodating judiciary: how the Supreme Court of Canada can actively encourage negotiations in aboriginal rights and treaty claims","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Canadian Heritage; Library and Archives Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Treaty; Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.013132198884151982,"score_gpt":0.28654894567041383,"score_spread":0.2734167467862619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238345167","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7346365,0.00041353807,0.000006804614,0.010402579,0.0007362952,0.0004747158,0.00028540715,0.000014499137,0.2530297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967981,0.00010603835,0.000019214605,0.00016837406,0.00019427868,0.00001793055,0.00010285401,0.000005970367,0.0025872383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982468,0.000101093465,0.00025968906,0.00022650044,0.00079311634,0.0003727889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887115,0.00042726478,0.00023754066,0.000090108246,0.00027435966,0.000099571735],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033386692,0.00019272284,0.00031922833,0.00007298719,0.0014064576,0.000040966745,0.00023808758,0.000121771685,0.000052927302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000096792966,0.00014274042,0.000034882745,0.00036688102,0.00024117426,0.000090921654,0.000012935971,0.00028845793,9.590524e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020060423,0.00017215773,0.070007265,0.00007730801,0.0006609526,0.00015106029,0.0417786,0.000109370405,0.00010216533,0.7856803,0.09455964,0.0065005724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004683755,0.000029391556,0.7360115,0.00025171906,0.00016971644,0.0000019037119,0.12628956,0.00003997216,0.00028273874,0.020611007,0.11514056,0.00070355675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99997574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7650693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009156557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016879862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238464789","doi":"10.26686/wgtn.17012060","title":"The implications of a supreme law Bill of Rights for judicial appointments in New Zealand","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Political science; Bill of rights; Commission; Judicial review; Human rights","score_opus":0.026396855507976283,"score_gpt":0.3290383673521254,"score_spread":0.3026415118441491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238464789","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03655587,0.0006139617,0.00012497089,0.0049825762,0.0009728763,0.0018395286,0.000098959055,0.000027717886,0.95478356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99170196,0.00012985746,0.000060977243,0.000042019357,0.00022806211,0.00006366915,0.000082796956,0.000004005197,0.00768666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991489,0.000038179838,0.00031978163,0.00012767708,0.00020905452,0.00015642004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991768,0.00029277467,0.00020346923,0.000085822634,0.00020612412,0.000034996163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002704382,0.00008326628,0.00022543971,0.000041420477,0.000487652,0.000011217642,0.00020664796,0.00010567111,0.000023056182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009712426,0.000048941263,0.00009626953,0.00015049521,0.00024304102,0.000033720422,0.000010579406,0.000049332073,0.0000031914644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045905188,0.000030615352,0.0006521088,0.0000047334356,0.000035133144,1.7950851e-8,0.0015133205,6.9256663e-7,0.000026035998,0.9911747,0.005576552,0.0009401583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024194446,0.00003716541,0.008696585,0.000049766408,0.00003671934,2.171906e-8,0.0009508098,5.5503193e-7,0.00016259581,0.8335847,0.1561633,0.00007580317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35889545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8144228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9551461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035638852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004317738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6453737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238693520","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199397594.001.0001","title":"Commitment and Cooperation on High Courts","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Political science; Context (archaeology); Empirical research; Judicial opinion; Law; Politics; Affect (linguistics); Ideology; Sociology","score_opus":0.036475991986721586,"score_gpt":0.24942328351011037,"score_spread":0.2129472915233888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238693520","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020466463,0.00007752883,0.000016559105,0.00021321146,0.000286306,0.00028556903,0.000078092045,0.000041953535,0.9987961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011304193,0.0009737142,0.00001488172,0.00008889494,0.00027213385,9.811997e-7,0.000020341091,0.0000050462663,0.9873198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992796,0.00005335905,0.000060033668,0.00020811589,0.00024909055,0.00014976623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951434,0.00005717157,0.00010756222,0.00014176093,0.000099336365,0.00007979886],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008965317,0.00013053445,0.0001845552,0.00003897803,0.0022778832,0.00008101073,0.00022752272,0.00017588571,0.000011746765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016422067,0.00013919546,0.000043591346,0.0000026787327,0.00087825465,0.00006615194,0.00014519482,0.00015634765,0.0000014029324],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003317696,0.000008892559,0.000007193345,0.0000049746636,0.000055308945,0.00002372799,0.00042751562,0.0000012163794,2.775407e-7,0.96984905,0.025813047,0.0037756206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022691228,0.00004251951,0.00006512625,0.000081302285,0.00006898535,2.4402752e-7,0.00009504896,7.7839667e-7,0.0000025515542,0.0051085805,0.9941547,0.0001532737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002982759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019462709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96834165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025861416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034114174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239013235","doi":"10.3138/9781442623873-012","title":"10. Democracy and the Problem of Constitutional Change in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.027449376564768,"score_gpt":0.2115166977869307,"score_spread":0.18406732122216268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239013235","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000037762944,0.0032195575,0.0000023181078,0.00018432108,0.00004704123,0.00038052167,0.00009084452,0.0000034492155,0.9960342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1492197,0.0022584451,0.000063766434,0.000051672152,0.00008898823,7.1752123e-7,0.0000054813713,0.0000039096344,0.8483073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993701,0.00003362188,0.00010431096,0.00011937561,0.00027266724,0.000099933844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950606,0.00012175307,0.0001578131,0.000066435874,0.00011621698,0.0000317251],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012508171,0.000085392494,0.00025284683,0.000008742268,0.00024192441,0.0000031786733,0.00018852855,0.00007388006,0.0004798972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000061091673,0.00007781319,0.000047857215,9.80085e-7,0.0027441494,0.000059245463,0.00013108851,0.000070130685,0.0000013749066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009481853,0.0000024239694,0.00010141309,0.000018221437,0.000054512246,0.0000040129075,0.003041887,9.117324e-7,2.1314415e-7,0.9932067,0.00047761947,0.002997291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050635403,0.000010246718,0.00029931506,0.00014780732,0.000052859927,3.2504468e-7,0.00037180798,0.0000023288978,6.059029e-7,0.00738343,0.991129,0.00009591731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9989255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99871033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99065137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003748139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016580404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239043492","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.4.417","title":"DIGNITY, LIBERTY, EQUALITY: A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS TRIANGLE OF CONSTITUTIONALISM","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Constitutionalism; Politics; Ideology; Fundamental rights; Sociology; Law; Liberalism; Bill of rights; Political science; Law and economics; Human rights; Democracy","score_opus":0.028095736643470138,"score_gpt":0.2739936088723604,"score_spread":0.24589787222889026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239043492","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043167215,0.0010971829,0.0003312812,0.0016245825,0.00027722356,0.000090511305,0.00003505972,0.00001617095,0.9533608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987462,0.000257604,0.0003190743,0.0000813911,0.00014958196,1.600025e-8,0.0000015752522,6.804985e-7,0.00044386802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908966,0.0001223651,0.00015100848,0.00007830884,0.00040854883,0.00015011532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939877,0.00005839572,0.00017729275,0.000047120076,0.00020761346,0.00011079055],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003724196,0.000061490566,0.00019803672,0.000016705424,0.0015356172,0.000016609285,0.00021506786,0.000053683,0.0010371659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022469816,0.0000614338,0.0001512005,0.000039847906,0.0012655545,0.0004386308,0.000037230013,0.00007317128,0.000005193826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073627496,0.00014014047,0.00040768247,0.0000013090605,0.000059479797,0.000014118536,0.003673981,0.0000020733507,0.00006987721,0.9934561,0.0009948935,0.001106685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018958288,0.00026919483,0.009167292,0.00011842253,0.00013375735,0.000020459924,0.016247254,0.00000203875,0.00010893456,0.22465317,0.7471506,0.00023302699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2488299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22908024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.955579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028000955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021492575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239126590","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3222081","title":"Formal Amendment Rules: Functions and Design","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Amendment; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.024200319832436024,"score_gpt":0.2784661220215614,"score_spread":0.25426580218912537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239126590","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.351283,0.013596004,0.337881,0.014641197,0.0022011045,0.00055221666,0.00000723392,0.00015566488,0.27968255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99253154,0.0043956772,0.0001030193,0.00011586277,0.0011510602,0.0000048007196,3.1768698e-7,0.000002884256,0.0016948272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983298,0.00007208933,0.000103133636,0.00008487639,0.00021112876,0.0011989643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997183,0.000039536037,0.00004564418,0.000029662253,0.0000965971,0.000070224945],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013771743,0.00005995454,0.00007093579,0.000038692666,0.0024899493,0.000054729207,0.00008453475,0.000031898915,0.000060400307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000633449,0.000050125713,0.000032856024,0.00009354091,0.00053042406,0.00022720038,0.000025279607,0.0003301656,0.000081861515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023819182,0.000017469041,0.0005710771,2.1519098e-7,0.000057429395,5.243877e-7,0.0010439664,8.6282466e-7,0.000022702057,0.97454065,0.00036890546,0.023352364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027702024,0.00038030156,0.00063891563,0.000009899635,0.00003445022,0.000051288436,0.022725863,0.000005848055,0.000013435968,0.912032,0.063714586,0.00011637206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008677978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006552447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6412485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042294955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016575995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239403724","doi":"10.22145/flr.28.3.2","title":"The Amicus Curiae and Intervener in the High Court of Australia: A Comparative Analysis","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; High Court; Law","score_opus":0.0715606218552786,"score_gpt":0.37732520514611634,"score_spread":0.3057645832908377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239403724","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36314768,0.2776912,0.000006842191,0.06900137,0.00016397193,0.0013141334,0.0000496778,0.000023117853,0.28860205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96366984,0.035325006,0.0000072427697,0.00061302865,0.000040680934,0.000031018477,0.000001703858,5.476478e-7,0.00031093915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991091,0.0003132096,0.00019949308,0.000084236715,0.00017986343,0.00011409038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967605,0.00014637796,0.00005494143,0.00006513416,0.00004014083,0.000017342983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006209135,0.00005711927,0.000250101,0.000007354751,0.0006646926,0.000040412044,0.00014538792,0.000017032078,0.00024272577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020148073,0.00002788305,0.00009510196,0.00031805536,0.0006842923,0.000049428338,0.000014657292,0.000065883636,0.000014927666],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005447377,0.000023564002,0.0016011437,0.000022272669,0.00012113369,0.0000013692013,0.0010045907,0.0000028033946,1.8457423e-7,0.9928024,0.0023579863,0.0020571335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009247885,0.00002532631,0.03224479,0.00042293087,0.00024581622,6.9316934e-7,0.0005645355,0.0000017525223,0.0000011742893,0.013910856,0.952406,0.00008364118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055181358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.116403356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9788915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015969481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017656383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95111024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240555861","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.1.163","title":"ENDING IMPUNITY: CRITICAL REFLECTIONS ON THE PROSECUTION OF HEADS OF STATE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impunity; State (computer science); Law; Mandate; Political science; Politics; Rule of law; Accountability; Premise; Economic Justice; Transitional justice; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08930135471851057,"score_gpt":0.31760099509362677,"score_spread":0.2282996403751162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240555861","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.122123055,0.00021868522,0.00076239894,0.00078844937,0.00023833779,0.00007287176,0.00001522767,0.0000075045987,0.8757735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993862,0.0002764842,0.00022045641,0.00001618876,0.00003529696,2.8015197e-8,1.0309051e-7,7.5857173e-7,0.00006450314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994704,0.00011434378,0.00008487029,0.000039036484,0.00020117938,0.00009012905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951756,0.00008810673,0.00009009344,0.00003611194,0.00022818468,0.000039933013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003533384,0.00003091827,0.00008427187,0.0000122311285,0.001104062,0.0000035331216,0.0001220488,0.00002318482,0.00043669826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000080268896,0.000025623536,0.00006392345,0.000035796405,0.0010475396,0.00017341546,0.00002606528,0.000074491145,8.3185415e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060824503,0.0000703455,0.00046144312,0.0000021842293,0.0000314428,0.0000018813208,0.018652247,0.000001142689,0.0002761202,0.97989017,0.000100709665,0.00045149057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011216028,0.001771447,0.061391473,0.0005070046,0.00033326022,0.000021410106,0.48461837,0.000012015968,0.0055073486,0.3411137,0.10321051,0.00039187545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18707389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1746978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8772631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012621249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000894036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84916633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240974853","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198714514.003.0002","title":"1 The View from the Bench: Where the Comparative Judicial Imagination Travels","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Argument (complex analysis); Supreme court; Politics; Political science; Law; Context (archaeology); Judicial activism; Identity (music); Judicial independence; Constitutional law; Judicial opinion; Judicial review; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.04402152046291239,"score_gpt":0.26244189533926976,"score_spread":0.21842037487635738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240974853","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000051874194,0.002119114,0.00016304049,0.003411717,0.0005392748,0.0006186709,0.00013833943,0.00004438916,0.9929136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013014946,0.0028891505,0.000010986686,0.00047849727,0.001590501,0.0000066860316,0.000029620578,0.000010054238,0.98196954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982236,0.00050018035,0.00015131643,0.00025904365,0.000586456,0.00027938533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979739,0.0012164759,0.00024661387,0.00025457874,0.00025240704,0.000055979774],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000463517,0.00021152689,0.00026802788,0.000016127775,0.006101727,0.00016871946,0.0011554341,0.00015939627,0.000028484157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033130807,0.00012009787,0.00017164004,0.000029518298,0.0032981797,0.00008482774,0.00025422822,0.0004535764,0.0000056949407],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002722976,0.000004986318,0.0000084676185,0.0000019777794,0.00015414903,0.0000025104496,0.01079158,0.0000016153782,3.0930045e-7,0.92417526,0.054754693,0.010077216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013646176,0.00001304538,0.00018625919,0.00006781913,0.00019369197,1.9661657e-7,0.0029944428,0.0000065170034,0.0000013271274,0.046064463,0.9501781,0.00015768358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010231335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03883352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8954234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031880307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086326443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99941427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241459668","doi":"10.21991/c9nt04","title":"Introduction","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Constitutional law; Sociology","score_opus":0.0167153703095397,"score_gpt":0.2599391723198297,"score_spread":0.24322380201029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241459668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0074024787,0.0016679339,0.050216634,0.16401726,0.007178531,0.0016030055,0.00009705926,0.00081077346,0.76700634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919405,0.00022820508,0.00092696893,0.0021765842,0.002247439,0.00030192226,0.00007662432,0.000008782781,0.002092983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968505,0.0001311308,0.00055363047,0.00059626385,0.000844464,0.0010240457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815315,0.0001636396,0.00016454162,0.00028906736,0.0008444559,0.00038513384],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004137954,0.00032312606,0.00033942185,0.00024380606,0.004963839,0.0002546529,0.0004064049,0.00023463057,0.0054771765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009501029,0.0003195669,0.00023973222,0.0006823181,0.01440807,0.0015970351,0.00015608923,0.00031148898,0.005747357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000126191935,0.00009174359,0.0077901124,0.0000033648503,0.00006466433,0.0000054711786,0.00012895589,0.000103357794,0.00013869484,0.8845671,0.104459666,0.0026342457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004660453,0.000026590082,0.0012885524,0.000032650656,0.000033678192,0.00004553691,0.004948771,0.00004225566,0.00007082146,0.18060693,0.81201416,0.00042398478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004861196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012586897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.984538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046198268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019180496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241702564","doi":"10.5040/9781472558732.ch-013","title":"The Politics of Deference:Judicial Review and Democracy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Deference; Politics; Political science; Democracy; Judicial deference; Judicial review; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04179389128346481,"score_gpt":0.27709069438164463,"score_spread":0.23529680309817982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241702564","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00000980106,0.019961031,0.000016385125,0.00880357,0.0003452585,0.0002677067,0.00003335174,0.000038961745,0.97052395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0460694,0.02286077,0.00006530426,0.0048385784,0.0025170974,0.000024469575,0.000018080484,0.000033937402,0.92357236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984812,0.00007209361,0.00037031833,0.00021902498,0.00056388095,0.00029344455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847233,0.00047631207,0.0003142326,0.00018261615,0.00043690935,0.000117577976],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00118101,0.00017533568,0.00041125846,0.000044224063,0.0020398798,0.00041365938,0.00042162454,0.00020770068,0.000064946325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012533255,0.00012976848,0.000117871925,0.000019421708,0.0018976867,0.00014432843,0.00020286479,0.0003740584,0.000016797183],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012291664,0.0000011198507,0.000019907764,0.000056077042,0.000041717314,7.577863e-7,0.0002634994,6.0205663e-9,2.683565e-7,0.94592714,0.041114178,0.012574067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029348104,0.000008340469,0.000026627025,0.0005091501,0.000105183404,7.9509596e-7,0.000045845987,6.321566e-8,4.8825086e-7,0.36669827,0.6324797,0.000096132775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019155866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023434213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5913656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000542556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052547205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99925935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242582533","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190075774.001.0001","title":"The History and Growth of Judicial Review, Volume 1","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Political science; Law; European union; Judicial activism; Common law; Economic Justice; Judicial independence; Democracy; Normative; Supreme court; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.025768170599019275,"score_gpt":0.25737160962395084,"score_spread":0.23160343902493155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242582533","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[7.052453e-7,0.29760307,0.0000028959414,0.0033252356,0.0006146566,0.00010365055,0.0000042379957,0.000009774569,0.69833577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00012294874,0.23267728,0.000008512098,0.0008560718,0.0005392439,0.000007189919,0.000003957824,0.0000032551156,0.7657815],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990936,0.00007080173,0.0001967873,0.00013777099,0.000375322,0.00012573897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993241,0.00015698868,0.00012427404,0.00007388206,0.0002810688,0.000039686773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043264762,0.00008796614,0.00027283383,0.0000140514185,0.0005135206,0.0000079216,0.00014756323,0.00009106289,0.0005705551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039216402,0.00006171499,0.00009439644,0.000040639636,0.0021434238,0.000027944847,0.000087283464,0.00012185331,0.000020484007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.897525e-7,0.0000020778446,0.000031685257,0.00002933112,0.000020483038,0.0000011619362,0.00010881865,5.5745275e-10,9.02007e-8,0.49149022,0.5071311,0.001184363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019100024,0.0000068550094,0.00013230147,0.000405576,0.00006059587,3.32067e-7,0.00008589973,2.7801246e-8,1.0764501e-7,0.049628146,0.9495872,0.00007383628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005009405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006463099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44245613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002571371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002024595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78975344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243102261","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2011.621655","title":"Canada: constitutional law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.03408508762595927,"score_gpt":0.28492890095226964,"score_spread":0.25084381332631034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243102261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010866717,0.0015821699,0.000053604446,0.0441848,0.0011322233,0.00015000724,0.000041930616,0.00006026552,0.9517083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97913873,0.000068170826,0.00011033808,0.019249354,0.0009475618,0.000021255062,0.0000090220565,0.0000034821926,0.00045208205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985303,0.0001426289,0.0001888911,0.000119471086,0.00045647132,0.00056220323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992283,0.0002053271,0.000060025384,0.0000987479,0.0000979062,0.00030968545],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005358274,0.0001005697,0.00015791849,0.000009909933,0.0025072845,0.000025118345,0.0001868073,0.000058350586,0.0017360002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008475449,0.00009760523,0.000039862643,0.00009347023,0.0029866393,0.000063424035,0.00006905442,0.00014582754,0.0003351113],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005486696,0.000035674166,0.0022522272,0.0000024702422,0.000010472391,0.0000025503664,0.00018608043,0.0000012620327,6.388227e-7,0.90939784,0.0879663,0.00013897236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011258228,0.000005289275,0.0013331734,0.000010097645,0.000007754777,0.0000022786207,0.00039166055,1.2958121e-7,0.0000070764736,0.0060122954,0.991994,0.00012364653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98329884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9736956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9780521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003518316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013037749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243861227","doi":"10.2307/3505144","title":"10.2307/3505144","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Political philosophy; Legal formalism; Legal research; Legal realism; Empirical legal studies; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Black letter law; Politics; Comparative law; Private law","score_opus":0.013089990980405737,"score_gpt":0.22750381308217638,"score_spread":0.21441382210177065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243861227","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007844774,0.00009855711,2.573878e-7,0.0022306377,0.0000045238257,0.0000799565,0.0000047161293,0.00007624309,0.9967206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00736755,0.0000025782742,0.00001856451,0.00015358035,0.00030552203,0.000008783207,0.0000012253644,0.0000024705387,0.9921397],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944085,0.000029032568,0.00006538008,0.00009784716,0.00018909243,0.00017781973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997879,0.00003319734,0.000008415127,0.000051284183,0.000035955785,0.00008320191],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012116782,0.00004742611,0.00007185764,0.000017777651,0.00048750386,0.000024851506,0.000115366194,0.000026615711,0.9873158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051541596,0.000044933317,0.00003103386,0.00017725278,0.00017091559,0.000057720183,0.000017234615,0.000030311667,0.9754637],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021506812,0.000028279463,0.0000025853947,4.1266284e-7,0.000012891093,0.0000032757944,0.00025818407,0.000010527011,0.0000041126495,0.002468233,0.17792298,0.81926703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039376835,0.000019156978,0.00013733243,0.000004437423,0.000005041745,2.3837138e-7,0.000015285395,9.4515235e-7,0.0000018391677,0.00044709156,0.99926037,0.000068875896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020305666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002460128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8213374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000326278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000064256026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37495348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243942785","doi":"10.1017/9781108335690.006","title":"The Federal Courts of Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Internet privacy; Political science; Law; Computer science; Law and economics; Computer security; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.022071053778746966,"score_gpt":0.2073884246494561,"score_spread":0.18531737087070912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243942785","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015590357,0.0002477933,0.000007580598,0.0001805649,0.0004866841,0.00015498012,0.00011882707,0.000018213006,0.99862945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013727843,0.00021697301,0.0000031425293,0.000051376635,0.0002960841,2.0114847e-7,0.0000026617238,0.0000053241456,0.9856964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990899,0.00003258125,0.00010122175,0.00015196,0.0004127065,0.00021163137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992158,0.00012005678,0.00014465576,0.00013215274,0.00030167765,0.00008567901],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012914522,0.00011999567,0.00017494835,0.000018013947,0.0020206315,0.000022683093,0.00036201632,0.000108949615,0.000008918259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026197475,0.00010789319,0.00008245766,0.000004204492,0.0017874907,0.00002436776,0.00015824242,0.0001311455,0.0000022444922],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018864312,0.0000010339352,0.0000028526656,0.0000027345036,0.00006973795,0.000019783425,0.000110061286,1.03328446e-7,4.0261065e-7,0.8088765,0.1906994,0.00019852654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073751544,0.0000100848365,0.000027047501,0.00003884944,0.00003937465,4.4988005e-7,0.00044090697,4.1876092e-7,0.000010564051,0.00036025458,0.99887645,0.00012181978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66031265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5152696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80851626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030057647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018409344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245069027","doi":"10.4324/9780429037399-62","title":"Legislation—Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02975286073703928,"score_gpt":0.24994664873454342,"score_spread":0.22019378799750414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245069027","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000013166725,0.0005121008,0.000015646929,0.0031119462,0.0008199343,0.00011001033,0.000014461743,0.000026928916,0.9953877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013144852,0.00027170105,0.000012932266,0.00073060684,0.00059913023,9.111348e-7,0.0000067555366,0.000004540871,0.9852286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992587,0.000004983943,0.000093165865,0.00011971803,0.00041089806,0.000112551505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997025,0.000059447357,0.000047339163,0.00006188147,0.000090396585,0.00003842573],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006501763,0.00008222379,0.00012527079,0.000016417454,0.00035242084,0.000016595859,0.000102197955,0.00009037408,0.004537026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020526271,0.00007453954,0.00004415229,0.0000113495435,0.00020416646,0.000035098616,0.000028940789,0.0000830716,0.0005412433],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.757748e-7,5.881951e-7,0.000035213747,5.7026546e-7,0.00001902654,0.0000017351418,0.000049123326,5.077362e-7,3.425072e-8,0.9218041,0.07652865,0.0015598993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018217044,0.0000021061662,0.000047951362,0.0000119339775,0.000008560168,7.676933e-8,0.00006860242,1.3227867e-7,8.797153e-8,0.11721388,0.88253206,0.00009639038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87516755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9892043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8060034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017999185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029969737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99637294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245165506","doi":"10.26686/wgtn.17006857.v1","title":"Mandatory pre-enactment review of legislation; or should only one government branch be responsible for the protection of rights in the United States?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Judicial review; Order (exchange); Government (linguistics); Law; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.08245029498750828,"score_gpt":0.3566531621127831,"score_spread":0.2742028671252748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245165506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28912452,0.07061826,0.003224636,0.08671794,0.0036097087,0.07535195,0.0012984844,0.00017237761,0.46988213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87760675,0.07628234,0.00025252232,0.0026848363,0.0004098524,0.0043033385,0.00080714625,0.000022564956,0.037630625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800915,0.00026395486,0.0004483137,0.00015468875,0.0009799092,0.0001439808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985212,0.00057027896,0.00040066591,0.0001477684,0.0003422466,0.00001784973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013921169,0.00012398271,0.0002693376,0.00004850747,0.00051513914,0.000018798923,0.00023792185,0.00009781669,0.0002693027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033090546,0.00006127737,0.00009345059,0.0004423221,0.00019952384,0.00009690051,0.000013478565,0.00013170076,0.0000018787968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015015153,0.0006319724,0.00009683738,0.0024965168,0.00041363764,5.0413286e-7,0.021793088,0.000039938204,0.0001228349,0.9447709,0.018938998,0.009193285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005692942,0.0003579468,0.010545635,0.005540813,0.00033626176,3.179199e-7,0.015545866,0.00003200885,0.000802688,0.0268664,0.9391386,0.00026418563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08004658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14175636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9201996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016823482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053469645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92607945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245238683","doi":"10.22215/etd/2013-06747","title":"Achieving legitimacy : the legal relationship between indigenous peoples and the Canadian state","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Canadian Heritage; Library and Archives Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Political science; Indigenous; State (computer science); Humanities; Library science; Law; Computer science; Art; Politics","score_opus":0.030283538396888222,"score_gpt":0.29617221085255635,"score_spread":0.2658886724556681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245238683","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53507644,0.00190488,0.000003565853,0.009014676,0.00030868137,0.00078453997,0.000026045042,0.00003163984,0.45284954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9739648,0.00036093712,0.000007902626,0.00023135099,0.0004006828,0.000079201665,0.00007700261,0.000007185975,0.024870947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998759,0.0002190962,0.00019003714,0.00016061924,0.00035230804,0.00031896867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982468,0.0013019752,0.00011104279,0.000092037946,0.00013848624,0.00010968283],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067404204,0.00013574428,0.00018428931,0.00006444588,0.008476009,0.00048968295,0.00027224087,0.00011747353,0.00007353032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066942076,0.00007399116,0.00006352599,0.0001923914,0.00087975524,0.00017082153,0.000020110156,0.00034373757,0.00006726334],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069147786,0.0000022312831,0.10607746,0.0000066651646,0.00006204056,9.562646e-7,0.08589394,8.8996575e-7,6.851645e-8,0.80400515,0.00088002573,0.0030636624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011886171,0.000004972179,0.8848206,0.000030839255,0.00008211377,3.5766382e-7,0.04758534,3.0957818e-7,3.3159844e-7,0.031435914,0.035764888,0.00015551587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9805465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7787431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014118382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025241436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99281484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245308103","doi":"10.3138/9781487535995-013","title":"Chapter Eight. The Supreme Court of Canada, Parliament, and the Role of Experts","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.018889503337006466,"score_gpt":0.19602329828315396,"score_spread":0.1771337949461475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245308103","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007710437,0.0068007777,0.0000039308666,0.00048717385,0.00006631732,0.00023370527,0.000092954906,0.0000041970247,0.9922338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7545818,0.0034004056,0.000022350552,0.0001152952,0.00014133983,6.611813e-7,0.000002393184,0.000008311625,0.24172741],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992668,0.00003455413,0.00011547259,0.0001214246,0.00036788557,0.00009383261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999394,0.00010705177,0.00021242719,0.000112583584,0.00012763562,0.000046296977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010855911,0.00009957705,0.0002694592,0.0000042425554,0.000371766,0.0000042919073,0.00031496453,0.00006612822,0.00013158706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010861445,0.00007109387,0.00008663243,7.75198e-7,0.0020994225,0.00003222703,0.00018329859,0.000057239824,1.2720606e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009671411,0.000002673181,0.000017927272,0.0000068310605,0.00016934004,0.000001765405,0.018098982,3.6438357e-7,0.000008347213,0.9791382,0.0011492468,0.0013096107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023821852,0.000016750986,0.000057129222,0.000053483658,0.00010950246,1.4916299e-7,0.0045922464,0.0000030109045,0.000041841708,0.009583855,0.9852231,0.00008071034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9830188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97150886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9840739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000084343745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026833796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.773541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245317821","doi":"10.4135/9781604265774.n361","title":"Constitutional Amending Process","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Encyclopedia of the First Amendment","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Computer science; Political science; Programming language","score_opus":0.024769301496125697,"score_gpt":0.2967305362290835,"score_spread":0.2719612347329578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245317821","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00045721597,0.0037712522,0.000023282364,0.0052659935,0.0038305386,0.000580667,0.00017398644,0.000050085182,0.985847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6497393,0.23307498,0.0001607369,0.0012358328,0.007413778,0.00027624526,0.000112771944,0.000025828336,0.1079605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972997,0.00008634679,0.000466604,0.00035457386,0.001331655,0.00046115564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989038,0.0001310228,0.00045405427,0.0002256864,0.00018404529,0.000101380516],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033396072,0.0002926656,0.0004644141,0.000061365856,0.0015574109,0.00003869412,0.0008064951,0.00024324228,0.00042850652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002322969,0.00021401166,0.00026649097,0.0002606415,0.0025075236,0.000106238476,0.00017221483,0.00041249985,0.00005664123],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024532319,0.00025689998,0.0021468538,0.000118464945,0.0001915681,0.0000063746866,0.0041128006,0.000040053703,1.136521e-7,0.70491624,0.2724323,0.015753768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015630579,0.000025931866,0.00039621207,0.00079628173,0.00010830971,0.0000012584612,0.0008339377,2.8904105e-7,0.0000054264538,0.021362925,0.97605884,0.00025429876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012522658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013349483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8778865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051772624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014467146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245355756","doi":"10.3138/9781442687721","title":"Contemporary Canadian Federalism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.038013267425203,"score_gpt":0.2329299119498765,"score_spread":0.1949166445246735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245355756","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000029969622,0.005150585,0.0000034324698,0.00018523766,0.00015598198,0.00022673675,0.000082258775,0.00003825436,0.9941545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0050894646,0.00057473883,0.00003359976,0.00014542404,0.00022776381,1.2476795e-7,0.00001766391,0.000004755382,0.99390644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991577,0.000059485865,0.00009429194,0.00018573191,0.00028648783,0.00021626161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993536,0.000033669363,0.00011766487,0.00011534481,0.00016165059,0.00021807216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000108521235,0.00013106014,0.00026873066,0.000019101879,0.00093101437,0.000019696576,0.0003713812,0.00026164218,0.00020404138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011198301,0.00016702861,0.00013269587,0.0000011206454,0.0007375827,0.00009762956,0.00005502529,0.00010987988,0.000008288222],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015539357,0.0000056801305,0.0000057002912,0.000006121466,0.000084358384,0.000050272793,0.009076797,2.498325e-7,3.1526588e-7,0.4981755,0.48978862,0.0027908282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013328965,0.000019680248,0.00007219018,0.00007808672,0.000037451802,1.9616066e-7,0.0004316955,1.9409003e-7,6.149182e-7,0.0041021374,0.9949547,0.00016973303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9977417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9941912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5051661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010598216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003533897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71607035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245955782","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1884416","title":"Measuring Legislative Boundaries","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.059634984908167474,"score_gpt":0.2713462916166129,"score_spread":0.2117113067084454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245955782","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049081936,0.0066696308,0.0042880494,0.0015537601,0.00074734323,0.00009708525,0.0000010125025,0.00006308073,0.9374981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99528146,0.0024369995,0.000056367204,0.000062486986,0.00052715477,0.0000027330098,1.4047875e-7,0.0000040335653,0.0016286473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800736,0.00009217493,0.00012415508,0.00009165262,0.0003154641,0.001369188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967265,0.00002168703,0.00007092122,0.00003824948,0.000135367,0.0000611399],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014299013,0.000071350805,0.000097909455,0.00004375413,0.00287717,0.00008658164,0.00018112596,0.000037844875,0.00009683718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016352364,0.00006184072,0.00006993399,0.00014119138,0.0008364138,0.00027372874,0.000024595802,0.00063177384,0.000063618056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016487522,0.000016872096,0.0036944386,2.0404217e-7,0.000080598984,0.000002092167,0.0127343265,1.5845953e-7,0.0000049078,0.97665465,0.000046776717,0.0067485003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000107043226,0.0000504975,0.0016592842,0.0000073374063,0.000016320364,0.00001682671,0.019999223,1.9358421e-7,0.000015580781,0.903922,0.074117474,0.00008819027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010900392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.065382905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9461995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006149259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052450574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99842095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246612561","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.3.405","title":"JUDICIAL POLITICS IN AUTHORITARIAN REGIMES","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Dialectic; Rule of law; Law; Constraint (computer-aided design); Politics; Political science; Power (physics); Law and economics; Judicial independence; Judicial review; Adjudication; Independence (probability theory); Sociology; Democracy; Epistemology; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015423808318879165,"score_gpt":0.2529957120198597,"score_spread":0.23757190370098055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246612561","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017396549,0.0008628038,0.00010561623,0.0053358767,0.00023752962,0.00004014921,0.000003132884,0.000011419922,0.9760069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982995,0.00047966416,0.00036459506,0.00007834989,0.0003112379,5.1563696e-9,2.6788032e-7,7.293459e-7,0.0004656751],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993931,0.00006804999,0.00008222884,0.000059906382,0.00021800054,0.00017873183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997006,0.000022775754,0.000060655522,0.00003244982,0.00009412192,0.00008938228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023731792,0.000042174324,0.000111153204,0.000016263462,0.0012765314,0.0000134482925,0.0001684476,0.0000500326,0.00029508796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003280435,0.000048415797,0.000058974278,0.000035129717,0.00038874298,0.00029611477,0.000016718515,0.00008889184,0.0000038620506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001665835,0.000038296435,0.00063496537,2.9363466e-7,0.000009040927,0.000034218378,0.004984043,0.0000028423294,0.00000580498,0.991471,0.0008597514,0.0019430935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075496803,0.00015575296,0.05442399,0.000069201385,0.000037638387,0.000008927375,0.06334688,0.0000040564414,0.000007214745,0.2866033,0.59440535,0.00018274602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42274737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5234226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9809029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003632119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017186672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9818176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246713511","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.519","title":"REGULATION AND PUBLIC LAW IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Delegation; Democracy; Legitimacy; Legislature; Political science; Statute; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.026559781979468653,"score_gpt":0.2704350863892322,"score_spread":0.24387530440976354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246713511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20278083,0.00031727672,0.000036415036,0.0018454554,0.000121031364,0.000042757125,0.000002065114,0.0000053297845,0.79484886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99946475,0.000110343346,0.00024214888,0.00002121175,0.00007718226,1.7063174e-8,1.8458071e-7,5.008542e-7,0.00008367535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962,0.000054716715,0.00004581372,0.000056669785,0.00013448825,0.000088273126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996389,0.00003208212,0.000052986517,0.000021406358,0.00019416388,0.0000604324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018203433,0.000030880285,0.000080877646,0.0000106222815,0.0009868224,0.000020860864,0.00007507861,0.00003431301,0.0003646538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016780863,0.00003315245,0.000023380908,0.000024498788,0.0010422278,0.000520125,0.000024653535,0.00010032904,0.0000014997668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014722217,0.000022571048,0.0023190046,2.4474207e-7,0.000011954405,0.000002489201,0.018196952,7.450109e-7,0.000080385995,0.97910017,0.00007141905,0.00017934035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008841473,0.00006769354,0.13725875,0.00002306246,0.000023366878,0.0000097064985,0.45902976,0.000018528654,0.000017619048,0.162344,0.24016158,0.00016178934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.54679865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9717438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8167562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018278898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000066818124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.758994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246812994","doi":"10.21991/cf29372","title":"Introduction","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Library science; Management; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.014407567624850822,"score_gpt":0.26246307782026373,"score_spread":0.24805551019541291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246812994","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016939899,0.0015017492,0.019475512,0.06921045,0.011022683,0.0012665965,0.00013236486,0.00063110585,0.87981963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921442,0.00020780461,0.00047911642,0.0016484596,0.0017161033,0.0000746674,0.00008766502,0.000008894944,0.0036330537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99685895,0.0001231136,0.0005074526,0.0006576453,0.0009127922,0.0009400701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851424,0.00016675083,0.00016868759,0.0003313126,0.0005369528,0.0002820877],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005740956,0.0003107648,0.00037344964,0.00024657507,0.0030683437,0.00014539633,0.00040281797,0.0002367444,0.004004061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057484244,0.0003165558,0.0002599305,0.00069305405,0.008881193,0.0010431246,0.00015780074,0.0003231792,0.00589647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047495145,0.00009043653,0.0287179,0.0000060668617,0.00007544581,0.0000078069515,0.00013969337,0.00031110403,0.00017000975,0.9429934,0.026392294,0.0010483508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069564115,0.000039413615,0.0008426755,0.000047392496,0.000035402314,0.00004636293,0.0044675563,0.00003946852,0.000080282894,0.07795307,0.9153151,0.00043765147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011228544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009179661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97520435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050112617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002352473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246913416","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195335354.003.0003","title":"Courts","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Charter; Federalism; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.032160369250661,"score_gpt":0.23190682354898737,"score_spread":0.19974645429832638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246913416","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000032162094,0.0000802692,0.00003320334,0.00014066148,0.0004740585,0.0001854591,0.000060419774,0.00010339261,0.9988904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024514047,0.0006333936,0.000070917624,0.00007069488,0.00042173514,3.1239725e-7,0.0000060789853,0.000009398175,0.99633604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991289,0.000017822102,0.000079019264,0.00022530659,0.0003352486,0.00021374968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944866,0.00005144041,0.0000999252,0.00013931959,0.00014025772,0.00012039748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009841291,0.00015709046,0.00019993042,0.00005721663,0.0011972822,0.000031114057,0.00034156567,0.00037817546,0.00016741999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012364008,0.00018026626,0.00013485798,0.0000037692976,0.0012423487,0.000055389046,0.00018193206,0.0003851031,0.000005747347],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015136263,0.0000035489177,0.0000033105152,0.0000028812433,0.000055180386,0.000048121154,0.00047804508,1.0629576e-7,0.0000023687512,0.99435604,0.0015101868,0.0035250876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010085834,0.000009502952,0.000008290002,0.000031788295,0.000076826356,5.9592645e-7,0.000110404064,1.2797805e-7,0.0000059068147,0.03302199,0.96642935,0.00020435326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002203854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030073754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96491915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010701618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027900783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9208648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247424246","doi":"10.3167/004058105780929273","title":"Constitutional Learning","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoria","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Democracy; Federalism; Politics; Political science; Constitutional crisis; Liberal democracy; Law; Presidential system; Political economy; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.019940313289468773,"score_gpt":0.3032975533610416,"score_spread":0.2833572400715728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247424246","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01634023,0.00031063322,0.0007325195,0.0039478405,0.00033588294,0.000044792887,0.0000013776532,0.00009474984,0.978192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99657476,0.00006631122,0.00015139114,0.00023134588,0.0013606866,0.000003950184,0.0000010999973,7.748814e-7,0.0016096862],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949926,0.00006111385,0.000059870523,0.00006844928,0.000175108,0.00013620139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997908,0.00008131986,0.0000178511,0.000024919045,0.000045374465,0.000039718954],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035234145,0.000035759847,0.000050909857,0.0000096803005,0.0009503174,0.000017934388,0.00006913326,0.000025697916,0.000936699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020436777,0.00003250192,0.000026614796,0.00007971899,0.0014536456,0.000086090455,0.00001823175,0.00006732178,0.00079556677],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060208718,0.000008722032,0.0010429706,1.4513256e-7,0.0000067662845,5.91013e-7,0.00085549726,0.00004317041,0.000016249813,0.98854357,0.00047876543,0.008997534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000691357,0.000005322816,0.0004146093,0.0000033614951,0.0000039287165,5.0152e-7,0.0007776181,0.0000032475282,0.000015740581,0.13408172,0.86457515,0.00004965185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043042444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037016976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9802345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004802389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000108008884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247438753","doi":"10.5860/choice.51-0510","title":"Judicial power in a federal system: Canada, United States, and Germany","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Choice Reviews Online","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Political science; Law","score_opus":0.026178366542338627,"score_gpt":0.2986725692637659,"score_spread":0.27249420272142727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247438753","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90145653,0.062010728,0.000010931319,0.012501408,0.0005813704,0.0013319394,0.000080205544,0.00005947571,0.021967378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96631986,0.028842436,0.00009258601,0.0034613882,0.00059912796,0.00008004298,0.00006312515,0.0000082025335,0.0005332534],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988867,0.000159343,0.0003110586,0.00015916605,0.00021262125,0.00027111813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995281,0.00009937596,0.00008574895,0.00006849124,0.00010043179,0.00011786204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002916861,0.00010644258,0.0003000984,0.000048690672,0.00038496507,0.000042000636,0.00010918849,0.00004125787,0.0000836657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027071923,0.000086014785,0.000028806373,0.00036431823,0.00018632149,0.00011024829,0.000041950945,0.00011392844,0.000029914836],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040609062,0.00082562276,0.3792547,0.0011763345,0.00023644048,0.00015707445,0.011643124,0.00003141473,0.00012126966,0.19332369,0.28565776,0.12753196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014600095,0.000008837837,0.0842343,0.0002969836,0.0000075206844,0.0000010882055,0.0015133995,0.000023751849,1.831118e-7,0.0002725279,0.91337043,0.00012497586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9783126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9866113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62771267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002523692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035858862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3507581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247837931","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv56fggn.4","title":"The Rule of Law in the Canadian Constitution","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Political science; Rule of law","score_opus":0.03792333151521577,"score_gpt":0.22821491347310258,"score_spread":0.1902915819578868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247837931","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004560663,0.0003333683,0.0000070818305,0.0001652862,0.00011427432,0.00020777201,0.000027420772,0.00000536117,0.99909383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3243043,0.0007004729,0.000060204697,0.00038450034,0.00026337834,9.121824e-7,0.000013754002,0.0000073344618,0.67426515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993354,0.000052759537,0.00009557816,0.000096116586,0.00028535692,0.00013480053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994812,0.00010954924,0.000102310245,0.00011519101,0.00014820059,0.000043569882],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003066674,0.000073441595,0.00013333689,0.00003492482,0.0013349502,0.000012336056,0.00039603852,0.00014002332,0.00004773636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014427196,0.00005701031,0.00007387724,0.0000066681437,0.0066452706,0.000028076694,0.00005398716,0.00013747411,0.000005900552],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014312722,0.0000021870428,0.000007792417,0.0000031302088,0.000028452168,0.0000097802795,0.0049511367,2.2001817e-7,3.665744e-7,0.9937516,0.00045653348,0.0007744981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007493928,0.000011486457,0.0000481207,0.00005532139,0.000035119105,3.697798e-7,0.0005302669,6.7231065e-7,0.0000030125243,0.06022267,0.9389581,0.000059896112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89590234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98095965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9385016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000107373504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000708736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247912287","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199604456.013.0013","title":"The Judicialization of Politics","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Legitimacy; Demise; Judicial review; Law; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.027087241119759724,"score_gpt":0.23687935841367114,"score_spread":0.20979211729391142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247912287","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000026452066,0.00022709074,0.000079508565,0.00011614143,0.0002798423,0.00025174156,0.000038396192,0.0000327791,0.99894804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017820857,0.0015385366,0.000013198493,0.000030544525,0.00030564042,7.0390445e-7,0.000007795684,0.000005551917,0.99631596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915254,0.00007619123,0.000116091345,0.000119016004,0.00033662296,0.00019951897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918854,0.0001577642,0.00017949498,0.00012156266,0.00029521,0.000057426092],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012005258,0.00009998224,0.00016270386,0.00003721025,0.0014962308,0.000028777327,0.00036940555,0.00017177852,0.000012237212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043890497,0.00008907308,0.00009522311,0.000015572079,0.0016140484,0.000047594363,0.00014530419,0.0001209063,0.0000011038172],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005089982,0.0000036284584,0.000007835792,0.0000057661828,0.000055427397,0.0000015790122,0.0006626427,8.008332e-7,2.960778e-7,0.97154796,0.026278868,0.0014301154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065641834,0.000010500512,0.000017560817,0.00004018058,0.000069567206,8.6894005e-8,0.0005549543,0.0000014089607,0.0000035272428,0.04431765,0.95482683,0.00009208215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006164557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011888962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.928548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021372392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077122933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248404925","doi":"10.1177/0067205x0403200101","title":"Rights, 'Dialogue' and Democratic Objections to Judicial Review","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Law; Project commissioning; Law and economics; Publishing; Judicial review; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.028867238795380747,"score_gpt":0.31940084993682827,"score_spread":0.29053361114144755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248404925","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019936697,0.60167056,0.00009024625,0.06936849,0.0004238982,0.0012173721,0.000012220859,0.000093412025,0.3269244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13785748,0.7785211,0.0005297045,0.08136034,0.00093206874,0.00032636896,0.000010328359,0.000009084827,0.00045347595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988466,0.00012046996,0.00027806062,0.00021845492,0.00027750325,0.00025893122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995299,0.000043706696,0.000057152367,0.0000927436,0.00010473626,0.00017174055],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042434284,0.0001230454,0.00037985595,0.000014635713,0.0023084034,0.000046047484,0.00011474139,0.00003707558,0.00016424067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023674575,0.0000981678,0.00009737125,0.00031104268,0.00036024113,0.00012943037,0.000051037547,0.00009410054,0.00031939067],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010922947,0.00002057312,0.000022965965,0.00039686088,0.00001596267,0.000004789781,0.00008400512,2.5472312e-7,8.1399014e-7,0.980337,0.016920546,0.0021950987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007211429,0.000028228842,0.00016171036,0.009048264,0.00007835153,0.000005799903,0.0000099861345,1.3431001e-8,0.000001294693,0.116773054,0.8736793,0.00014187765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028565358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044569492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86356395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009605193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017126008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248688215","doi":"10.21991/c9vq2q","title":"SECTION 33 AND THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEGISLATURES AND COURTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Constitution; Law; Political science; Section (typography); Politics; Separation of powers; Government (linguistics); Balance (ability); Business","score_opus":0.06463527563743278,"score_gpt":0.28574065324498915,"score_spread":0.22110537760755639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248688215","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.122198984,0.009930224,0.037169583,0.034815133,0.00433357,0.0021459681,0.00036058595,0.00053065195,0.78851527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975728,0.00033545552,0.00035945143,0.0007394649,0.0005830217,0.00008446933,0.000023815484,0.000005953478,0.0002956085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99786544,0.00022649634,0.00042358172,0.00042557254,0.00050629757,0.00055259076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980926,0.0010857052,0.00017219906,0.0001739107,0.00024907794,0.00022653394],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009749655,0.0002608664,0.00032715267,0.00015462264,0.006689999,0.00013697952,0.00021511596,0.00024227101,0.00007231931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016304906,0.0002024463,0.00012297592,0.00030990125,0.030413955,0.0007177589,0.0001780683,0.00039359732,0.000037642483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006773959,0.000017443677,0.30958673,0.000003948542,0.000054703916,0.0000037889477,0.00087699527,0.0000023706834,0.0000013233666,0.6880652,0.00094755465,0.00037226084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017999006,0.000031789867,0.16639608,0.000091361784,0.00015561859,0.000081293234,0.0052049714,0.000012129024,0.000007876506,0.70765483,0.11818485,0.00037927245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037753745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022728022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8753738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011833045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084899756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99460316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249081328","doi":"10.31228/osf.io/e9py5","title":"Abusive Emulation and Justificatory Borrowing","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Douglas College","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Scrutiny; Law and economics; Context (archaeology); Constitution; Autocracy; Political science; Law; Democracy; Sociology","score_opus":0.046520428986605855,"score_gpt":0.3245348488080741,"score_spread":0.27801441982146824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249081328","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15421708,0.002626958,0.00143909,0.0040793368,0.0022682396,0.00050756615,0.000013559249,0.00013670485,0.8347115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99730766,0.0005372695,0.00013003245,0.00019880066,0.0004264594,0.000010300968,0.00000619115,0.000002998249,0.0013802833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992881,0.000044956636,0.00010527737,0.00021717374,0.00021837268,0.00012614852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996589,0.00007427264,0.000055976772,0.0000763876,0.000093237686,0.00004122162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022071549,0.000080811806,0.00013360809,0.00003729574,0.00046641158,0.00006122805,0.000087928085,0.0001436964,0.0000912256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009486068,0.00007606005,0.000040103874,0.000046466856,0.00032044144,0.000060214297,0.0002061526,0.00014765772,0.00007030885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004979475,0.000013654887,0.016108584,0.000027150718,0.00004684688,0.000001703759,0.0073153647,0.0002548924,0.000018564559,0.96915317,0.001974574,0.0050805113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034590295,0.000021845493,0.22995734,0.00037755608,0.00023786475,7.148306e-7,0.03167805,0.00046309063,0.00004245844,0.351824,0.3839011,0.0011500894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008963782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015805729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8430906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006592025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002695728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249344689","doi":"10.1017/s0008423907070254","title":"The Courts","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Government (linguistics); Politics; Audit; Constitutional court; Public administration; Sociology; Constitution; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.025866911710126894,"score_gpt":0.32130070467779775,"score_spread":0.29543379296767086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249344689","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38860783,0.0008091462,0.00056852354,0.047984473,0.0027020609,0.00007407705,0.0000031837703,0.0000062132913,0.55924445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985733,0.00000865771,0.000045543733,0.00065934774,0.00057771616,1.13550115e-7,9.849647e-9,8.48823e-7,0.0001344385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998349,0.000022937134,0.00016040326,0.00005187694,0.00047967484,0.0009360907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975407,0.00026600144,0.000044520704,0.000042981083,0.00043680868,0.0016689936],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040945997,0.00003296062,0.00005502979,0.00007893592,0.0031754503,0.00013090421,0.0004543162,0.000020528301,0.0000371675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029225033,0.00002094958,0.000036501922,0.00034158293,0.0071303765,0.00015625733,0.000010189459,0.000107442014,0.000016818785],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.673407e-7,0.000001398291,0.0037141026,8.243755e-8,0.0000015388717,0.000027284497,0.00034713472,1.8244445e-7,0.000009330307,0.9932599,0.00046668635,0.0021714116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056375284,0.000032007403,0.3883619,0.00001328579,0.000006425552,0.00002925978,0.006929117,7.735689e-7,0.000089106295,0.26495907,0.33945075,0.00007192922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20225602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5428233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7283008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005238709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073825526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99824464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249658205","doi":"10.1515/icl-2019-0052","title":"Judicial Review (Departmentalism) vs Supremacy: The Connection to a 17th Century Debate and a Dilemma for Today","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ICL Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Supreme court; Judicial review; Law; Separation of powers; Legislature; State (computer science); Unitary state; Sovereignty; Political science; Judicial activism; Power (physics); Interpretation (philosophy); Dilemma; Enumerated powers; Judicial interpretation; Philosophy; Politics; Epistemology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0444017283513609,"score_gpt":0.32340335831165345,"score_spread":0.27900162996029254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249658205","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19106428,0.043703996,0.0012727529,0.74804074,0.0020810408,0.002100222,0.00007891244,0.0000834265,0.011574626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9617102,0.014749891,0.00007111323,0.021492071,0.0019200392,0.000032218293,0.0000015928258,0.0000045140896,0.000018349396],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912316,0.000111361354,0.00017777152,0.000117084724,0.00026226143,0.00020837918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949336,0.00010311254,0.000076389486,0.00003091431,0.00011561156,0.00018061609],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050658046,0.000074595955,0.00015571162,0.000013558793,0.0015475072,0.00009802092,0.00012189477,0.000023451874,0.00008898248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047732194,0.00004982873,0.00007987984,0.00015960581,0.00016298855,0.000118667675,0.000045240165,0.00010391164,0.00001711485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00091418973,0.00015656104,0.009375807,0.00018792883,0.00051519723,0.00008551895,0.03539377,0.000020445344,0.00060974975,0.40211278,0.42004824,0.13057981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002999932,0.00013238168,0.0017547625,0.00020201191,0.00008194587,0.00002847349,0.0013474262,0.0000057676552,0.000019037472,0.0074337837,0.9885929,0.00010146484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005390022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007660976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7706459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054595454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012516168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249892796","doi":"10.1057/978-1-137-52159-0_2","title":"Lower Courts","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Aotearoa; Law; Officer; Political science; Work (physics); Sociology; History; Engineering","score_opus":0.037099568507252136,"score_gpt":0.284012807240196,"score_spread":0.24691323873294388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249892796","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000019325369,0.0017573747,0.000010552354,0.0003868954,0.0016365825,0.00035608903,0.000093213705,0.000106121144,0.99563384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8794517,0.0005788526,0.000023431157,0.00025143064,0.0018544892,0.000015299265,0.000010745662,0.000028620516,0.11778544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810064,0.00002666536,0.00026933677,0.00042827765,0.0007185387,0.00045652397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875927,0.00008985311,0.00028902304,0.00043110023,0.00022500554,0.00020574241],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003019975,0.0003566587,0.00046996074,0.0000878212,0.0020301621,0.00013474189,0.0005665633,0.00038948227,0.0011743606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009728623,0.00033711197,0.00030205466,0.000004006979,0.0020004818,7.3432005e-7,0.00019528516,0.0002862195,0.0009334575],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013870875,2.0786626e-7,0.000058387537,0.0000048694014,0.0001161157,0.000099633464,0.0005578816,5.1741416e-8,0.000002014857,0.9876364,0.0003170647,0.01119351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008923916,0.000019776038,0.00011669588,0.00009740448,0.000055681063,0.0000019130723,0.00003871587,9.74577e-8,0.0000019646434,0.6929953,0.30627602,0.000307164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029002484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008444638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8794324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013398175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004318548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249976768","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0037","title":"The role of the courts in the political constitution","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Constitution; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Legislature; Law; Political science; Judicial review; Principal (computer security); Constitutional law; Enforcement; Judicial independence; Constitutional theory; Sociology; Law and economics; Democracy","score_opus":0.0070442479614752545,"score_gpt":0.22683069639267164,"score_spread":0.21978644843119638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249976768","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11590423,0.0004563346,0.000011932316,0.008353258,0.00038763712,0.00007377452,0.000004515142,0.0000024856295,0.87480587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99966884,0.00010848352,0.000016786842,0.00006347611,0.00010739702,2.8381693e-8,5.0359404e-8,3.270303e-7,0.000034587596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993918,0.00012164517,0.000065958215,0.00003232879,0.00026289263,0.00012540177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996142,0.00013059162,0.00006551525,0.000056247485,0.000102606275,0.000030841784],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046858474,0.000027606644,0.000052748994,0.000003264897,0.0020457245,0.00001460385,0.0003560456,0.000032180575,0.00008020637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007774814,0.000015013512,0.00006106713,0.000022458402,0.0026574382,0.00011540437,0.000038275066,0.00014958685,0.0000010369481],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009899763,0.000018767836,0.005058084,1.9982326e-7,0.0000081040525,0.0000011964872,0.0023920164,8.0222947e-7,0.00007418587,0.99166393,0.000120868855,0.0006519665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020293612,0.000017142484,0.04040336,0.000015969894,0.000026223724,0.000011086808,0.1281273,0.0000039244796,0.000044789787,0.13833788,0.6927654,0.000043999524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26409072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75531757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8837646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007733021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018945635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99925345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251548378","doi":"10.7228/manchester/9781526114556.003.0011","title":"Speaking to power: mechanisms for judicial–executive dialogue","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Manchester University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Panacea (medicine); Power (physics); Political science; Executive power; Economic Justice; Law; Psychology; Politics; Medicine","score_opus":0.055280266297627854,"score_gpt":0.26228997408474153,"score_spread":0.20700970778711367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251548378","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000011794225,0.000060693765,0.0056280135,0.00037846883,0.0008769031,0.0010162647,0.0002569279,0.00010047143,0.9916705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0343119,0.000078654564,0.0004493527,0.00043386486,0.00074180204,0.0000078919475,0.000016848362,0.000034415374,0.96392524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851453,0.000034713063,0.00015175552,0.00050274405,0.00038498855,0.00041127106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889755,0.00011687727,0.00024124712,0.00029888854,0.00025523914,0.00019020586],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023401942,0.00029470387,0.0004374547,0.00011791415,0.002240981,0.00011518875,0.0007277193,0.00033454844,0.000023678653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053662527,0.00034717968,0.00026152845,0.0000050926715,0.0005655624,0.00012106532,0.00047650823,0.00020478941,0.00003117475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000095358184,0.000006436016,0.0000017361693,0.000010220859,0.0001499438,0.000049397106,0.0057829157,6.7108687e-7,0.000007881255,0.9886423,0.0031309465,0.0021222068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024428646,0.00006958667,0.000013137874,0.00018270875,0.00016380059,4.930078e-7,0.000786537,3.753784e-7,0.000018660936,0.085503355,0.91262466,0.00039238142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004761271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006217973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90949374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031369063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002467806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252259171","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198861973.003.0012","title":"What’s Wrong with (Some) Judges?<i>Carter</i>and the Invention of a Right to ‘Physician-Assisted Dying’","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.026514044808721427,"score_gpt":0.25269523489264556,"score_spread":0.22618119008392412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252259171","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018818924,0.0012589452,0.000055975735,0.018854404,0.00033817676,0.000549927,0.000008412065,0.000043928274,0.97870207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6544817,0.0033981558,0.00017598007,0.01343434,0.001810314,0.00009253181,0.000025398693,0.000046145928,0.3265354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879307,0.000045453933,0.00022987628,0.0002678931,0.00050851144,0.00015520716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937576,0.0001098473,0.00016860272,0.00011046737,0.00014781364,0.00008749053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021148572,0.00018370095,0.00039785609,0.00004553581,0.0005620068,0.00010157201,0.00017961087,0.00009993982,0.000115649986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002186004,0.0001095252,0.0001171185,0.0000790093,0.0014599616,0.00021422467,0.000103023245,0.00014863754,0.000054281463],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069649854,0.000007949205,0.000013469945,0.000010099538,0.00014593481,0.000003806095,0.0023969188,4.046958e-7,0.000007083569,0.99289757,0.0013880807,0.0030590352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007937624,0.00013872799,0.000325437,0.0006060844,0.00032295528,0.0000010967397,0.0040507377,0.000002167442,0.000024849818,0.5551191,0.43822747,0.0003875899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015641496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064107124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65429354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005581106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015609387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53792894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253039063","doi":"10.21991/c9pq25","title":"Introduction","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Political science; Library science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.015768966203594546,"score_gpt":0.2637771714862154,"score_spread":0.24800820528262082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253039063","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023387705,0.00074167043,0.18468246,0.08500734,0.0065872218,0.0005991438,0.00007218267,0.0006334591,0.71933776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918857,0.00015581933,0.0009610445,0.002215518,0.0033656787,0.00009022861,0.00007772227,0.000008692315,0.0012395731],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99684715,0.00020908836,0.00052366557,0.00061807496,0.00086267706,0.0009393662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837846,0.00023885045,0.00017191349,0.00030917994,0.0005603734,0.000341209],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008931226,0.0003132585,0.00036038234,0.0002382842,0.005322028,0.00015762384,0.00040380174,0.00022958538,0.0011043113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018310479,0.00031836238,0.00024195093,0.00063273194,0.014036451,0.00083346193,0.00014221761,0.00030178952,0.0015058392],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003165228,0.000087462366,0.006707747,0.000004157377,0.000055245342,0.0000039353476,0.00012124961,0.0002619946,0.00007422557,0.95148045,0.037537895,0.003634016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000514896,0.0000339949,0.0004697667,0.00003263889,0.000039030416,0.000036309466,0.0017890004,0.00008339194,0.00006318377,0.15971339,0.83685124,0.00037312874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011486597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016058753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98954695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038438608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014918705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254039495","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.1.81","title":"JUDICIAL REVIEW AT THE MARGINS: LAW, POWER, AND PREROGATIVE","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Law; Judicial review; Political science; Power (physics); Politics; Law and economics; Sociology; Physics","score_opus":0.011029377175947543,"score_gpt":0.2473415289119836,"score_spread":0.23631215173603606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254039495","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024486154,0.020387791,0.000010690629,0.007493951,0.00041792582,0.0001364324,0.000012718775,0.0000093473345,0.94704497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736192,0.024821993,0.00010378055,0.0006106439,0.00018990251,7.3190705e-8,4.2538554e-7,0.0000016282995,0.00065234496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994052,0.000087787375,0.00007075698,0.00007145524,0.00024312554,0.00012167679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955624,0.000064844746,0.00010158503,0.000050507828,0.00014727795,0.000079543686],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041156955,0.000050236526,0.00011936161,0.0000032188657,0.0029288495,0.000014737369,0.00018061051,0.00003702358,0.0020666933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045110508,0.000039698367,0.00006690548,0.000020216945,0.0019793492,0.0002604425,0.00009966474,0.00013281913,0.000008362402],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022662294,0.000017957113,0.00038571074,0.0000050989797,0.0000472197,0.000008385931,0.004999433,8.132039e-8,0.00003614633,0.987698,0.005631368,0.0011479422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001850233,0.000031508906,0.004097884,0.00010785734,0.000057205005,0.000010668225,0.0068732747,1.4655016e-7,0.000005445652,0.006073381,0.9824937,0.00006392185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20904116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85459894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9816246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010834189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007070608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254456953","doi":"10.3138/9781442689473","title":"The Transformation of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Transformation (genetics); Law; Political science; Biology; Genetics","score_opus":0.015583692636237238,"score_gpt":0.20283334756063387,"score_spread":0.18724965492439663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254456953","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006287193,0.0012509399,0.000008634703,0.00021394446,0.00011978809,0.00020456291,0.00006196612,0.000003902725,0.9980734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07485009,0.0011046858,0.000010273676,0.000022224269,0.00007053789,1.662302e-7,0.0000026993457,0.0000027479864,0.9239366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992041,0.00005887109,0.00011922063,0.00006019535,0.00045651844,0.00010111409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993623,0.00008125148,0.00021884334,0.00010617239,0.00020703107,0.00002438886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014680505,0.000065248976,0.00016059057,0.0000032900214,0.0006124641,0.0000029346204,0.00044299578,0.00007521674,0.000019261595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014050396,0.000049153034,0.00009908985,0.000001852716,0.0008721369,0.000042884934,0.000041298128,0.00006082625,5.6153482e-8],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051886505,0.000009204628,0.000009398665,0.000027542947,0.00013347674,6.120126e-7,0.021582294,0.000011431455,0.0000069522694,0.9197446,0.05328205,0.0051405695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008969562,0.000012349144,0.0003396115,0.00007482384,0.00006554346,5.3495988e-8,0.0013438015,0.0000013084233,0.000042627526,0.0025483742,0.99542993,0.000051878134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9967091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9421479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037532608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019805268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47106406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254501228","doi":"10.3886/icpsr29121.v1","title":"Survey Study of 43 Supreme Court Common Law Judges on the Use of Foreign Law in Constitutional Rights Cases","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"ICPSR Data Holdings","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Common law; Precedent; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.23345560593437809,"score_gpt":0.35682623798594476,"score_spread":0.12337063205156668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254501228","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027045757,0.00014805194,0.0000012214052,0.00020803734,0.000297374,0.00075267546,0.9690787,0.000014953496,0.0024531975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61847585,0.000098272714,0.000004840344,0.000299439,0.00012423503,0.000018571322,0.3809689,0.0000038324597,0.000006031372],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996565,0.0008266566,0.00064815657,0.0005180177,0.001110566,0.00033159205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941798,0.003924995,0.00046968082,0.0010893694,0.00026560278,0.00007055636],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023859544,0.00028542342,0.0007152975,0.000106764426,0.0009710318,0.00009631717,0.0016554956,0.00020215474,0.000147804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011472161,0.00020443767,0.00006533477,0.0003460236,0.0068224384,0.00038898387,0.00070893636,0.00036673158,0.000024824127],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048220492,0.00038949976,0.0038710588,0.000010492603,0.00008241497,0.000016611906,0.000100784084,0.000008308771,2.791979e-7,0.44110897,0.55435616,0.000007214958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003796694,0.0001793429,0.003465396,0.00019992924,0.00010692044,0.0000020060002,0.0005258757,0.000002389383,0.000004993954,0.0053662905,0.98951256,0.00025462627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.69182575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8167557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5914301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008977256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024283878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254822717","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511498893","title":"A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Constitutional theory; Constitutional law; Judicial review; Bill of rights; Sociology; Constitution; Politics","score_opus":0.02932983238594668,"score_gpt":0.24384590975720585,"score_spread":0.21451607737125916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254822717","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000008636951,0.0074221515,0.000029525043,0.000068070665,0.0002208969,0.0004516065,0.00027509927,0.000066841516,0.99145716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001319498,0.0028504224,0.0000081640055,0.00036924143,0.00037454415,0.0000011011003,0.00004448154,0.000010195226,0.99502236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985806,0.0002678752,0.00021448066,0.00024829892,0.00044680818,0.00024196866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903154,0.00017866537,0.00027602224,0.00019986136,0.0002323998,0.00008149893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037913636,0.00019454697,0.0005637614,0.0000534303,0.00069209246,0.000011630399,0.00047765078,0.00022699915,0.000006756739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023056233,0.00022019309,0.0002671393,0.000025181644,0.0025989816,0.00005697739,0.00022269478,0.00025827333,0.000008960226],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002038011,0.000010968485,0.0000017315691,0.0001383954,0.00006353092,0.00003228783,0.000051869556,8.9205585e-8,4.4266486e-7,0.71530944,0.2838745,0.00049634365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013966554,0.000017278533,0.000013226385,0.0015210616,0.00037761725,7.244189e-7,0.000066537425,6.517762e-8,0.0000056431463,0.0024936527,0.9951476,0.00021691913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018628873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009200156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7128158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028400015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006554053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98790616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254957963","doi":"10.3138/ijcs.2018-0004","title":"Morality Politics of Physician-Assisted Suicide: Comparing Canada and the United States","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Federalism; Politics; Public opinion; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.06838345814949211,"score_gpt":0.33459332473649106,"score_spread":0.26620986658699897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254957963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9587417,0.0020884566,0.0000017481782,0.028348912,0.0008811701,0.00006599667,0.000036389913,0.0000019032933,0.0098337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99702865,0.0013026842,0.000014493672,0.0013349624,0.00020054769,7.363503e-7,0.0000021195692,0.0000020124432,0.00011379309],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989286,0.00008627444,0.00027883565,0.000051722625,0.0005057673,0.00014876555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99803454,0.0003661238,0.00022915925,0.000036415204,0.001244055,0.00008973401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003872577,0.00006275511,0.00023962112,0.00019515265,0.00026054226,0.000025568901,0.00022720467,0.000014730691,0.000008481147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029165347,0.00004377969,0.000047555382,0.00022927998,0.0007547836,0.00007563962,0.00003846011,0.00008965997,6.843532e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007147406,0.000016003369,0.16909286,0.000008830162,0.0015574652,0.00003352586,0.007862961,0.00034712395,0.0000067863793,0.8134856,0.0066107837,0.0009065636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024201714,0.00005240479,0.42572597,0.00036945136,0.00017079443,0.00002086428,0.118972205,0.000095918425,0.000063728425,0.04479892,0.407032,0.00027756274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9965532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99785125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7686867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037740622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011932332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27810317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255184868","doi":"10.5040/9781509931125","title":"British and Canadian Public Law in Comparative Perspective","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Law; Political science; Comparative law; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06446384273474136,"score_gpt":0.2858677723629278,"score_spread":0.22140392962818645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255184868","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001525087,0.002858844,7.8483953e-7,0.006392078,0.00039991745,0.0002583737,0.000099870056,0.00004858367,0.98978907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3581878,0.00012679365,0.000036094287,0.0025792185,0.0011593814,0.000056331755,0.00009786148,0.000018913252,0.63773763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982002,0.0001564631,0.000210264,0.00045509273,0.0004566121,0.00052136794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986842,0.00014815606,0.00008510618,0.00010119351,0.00061410083,0.000367203],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000578639,0.00017650386,0.0004014791,0.00017772971,0.0011947942,0.0039154566,0.0002908307,0.00033890776,0.00038272378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004083343,0.00022998388,0.00007290772,0.00010271721,0.001524383,0.0008345903,0.00013710289,0.0006829709,0.000012543512],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.486363e-7,0.0000055933547,0.000088148125,0.0000034218403,0.00004168931,0.000108052765,0.008504547,4.3317915e-8,1.2782277e-7,0.8910894,0.099547274,0.00061089144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011000701,0.0000055578494,0.00032005226,0.00017939959,0.000011373595,0.000005768615,0.009676086,3.289771e-7,2.0514318e-7,0.12879802,0.8606639,0.00022929398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93237704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99877363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7622913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016508426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007504755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255216585","doi":"10.3200/socp.149.3.284-286","title":"Authoritarian Personality and Rape Sentence Length in Conservative and Liberal States","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University","funders":"","keywords":"Conservatism; Authoritarianism; Sentence; State (computer science); Psychology; Punishment (psychology); Wright; Homicide; Criminology; Social psychology; Political science; Poison control; Law; Suicide prevention; History; Mathematics; Politics; Philosophy; Linguistics; Medicine; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.04883111009689248,"score_gpt":0.37507920793558486,"score_spread":0.32624809783869235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255216585","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8731804,0.0010608643,0.000024703348,0.113693334,0.00014847425,0.000056312452,0.0000026993102,0.000003726308,0.011829499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99605346,0.0014393019,0.00004705057,0.0021358456,0.00027775005,3.193857e-7,1.3966007e-7,0.0000011385657,0.00004501337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990834,0.00037305296,0.00018064173,0.00006449822,0.00014545984,0.00015297443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995283,0.00018669355,0.0001255221,0.000019732937,0.00009741746,0.000042327676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001192738,0.000056217665,0.00016339641,0.000032082015,0.000599443,0.000015372223,0.00009601589,0.000054465054,0.000017334798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001045436,0.0000399884,0.000025619694,0.00012856726,0.001263807,0.0001114733,0.00001372129,0.0002125787,8.1928897e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00086478906,0.00024920303,0.08838594,0.0000035796334,0.00013418887,0.00003988499,0.29313418,0.0000015660231,0.00031965747,0.5781519,0.0070213214,0.031693794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003413892,0.0001050815,0.78062075,0.000007806148,0.000013895181,0.000014934405,0.01766455,7.747308e-7,7.8173144e-7,0.19813225,0.0030528952,0.000044894972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011007884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013564627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6922348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025801626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000072779905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46565497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255305783","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511920806","title":"The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":183,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Commonwealth; Normative; Legislature; Law and economics; Appeal; Political science; Constitutional theory; Novelty; Relevance (law); Law; Democracy; Public administration; Constitutional law; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04322599364376026,"score_gpt":0.24203611177500073,"score_spread":0.19881011813124047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255305783","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000018042681,0.00062654994,0.0006481569,0.00045721605,0.00029854692,0.00039637167,0.00019554548,0.00005070442,0.99730885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020513916,0.0009593086,0.0000487418,0.0000940181,0.00027939805,9.594197e-7,0.000014453071,0.000006335599,0.9965454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878067,0.000091423135,0.00017716186,0.00020481937,0.00047239277,0.00027352013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998805,0.0002442149,0.00024185599,0.00021015153,0.00032620894,0.00017257337],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019747343,0.00016697944,0.00027939983,0.000046850837,0.0017735201,0.000038283084,0.0006317562,0.00021593655,0.0000029688504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004814718,0.00014986975,0.00016443987,0.000016892083,0.0036091243,0.00007505614,0.00024978854,0.00026961943,0.000013362287],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010737646,0.000003270272,0.000001034803,0.0000051347715,0.000053665284,0.0000022267054,0.00013967733,0.000012426975,8.282035e-7,0.5950686,0.40439895,0.00030350912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017625443,0.000008305271,0.0000050047483,0.000069076246,0.00008648059,4.5275837e-7,0.0002495194,0.00004341209,0.0000041678118,0.0027042853,0.9964933,0.00015975171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01886233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048277472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59236425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036821375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048589846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255395321","doi":"10.1093/icon/moz056","title":"Dialogic remedies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogic; Constitutionalism; Judicial review; Legislature; Law; Declaration; Maturity (psychological); Political science; Politics; Sociology; Law and economics; Democracy","score_opus":0.02327899340654451,"score_gpt":0.3129759707294164,"score_spread":0.2896969773228719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255395321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030758604,0.0008586411,0.0009818546,0.010967963,0.0086563695,0.000108860746,0.000022665252,0.000024809538,0.9476202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99589145,0.0002802097,0.00035583577,0.0013145384,0.0016743811,0.0000015902342,0.0000033978051,0.0000020704695,0.0004765422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981761,0.00006721403,0.00035942305,0.00009577523,0.0011439468,0.00015757115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813306,0.00022040529,0.00023843083,0.0000478572,0.0012710614,0.000089198154],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005740596,0.000083028535,0.00017207966,0.00010348371,0.00026784127,0.000071400216,0.00044545415,0.00005681216,0.001026279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003213324,0.0000707422,0.0001585548,0.00009310139,0.0024198096,0.00046298848,0.000054319902,0.00015159081,0.00028078037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006104715,0.00004847922,0.006721975,8.2944615e-7,0.00014269911,0.000044901164,0.00023058653,0.00007281933,0.00016521881,0.99074244,0.0012819658,0.00048705895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000432221,0.00003451711,0.0013738,0.00006244115,0.000015406185,0.00006313569,0.00041551268,0.0000016039468,0.000074726384,0.1617411,0.83568907,0.00009647056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051021506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030521123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96513283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018864294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078495324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255463919","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511511226","title":"Judging Russia","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Legislature; State (computer science); Law; Administration (probate law); Politics; Reputation; Separation of powers; Federalism; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.03243524586203801,"score_gpt":0.22795417218483505,"score_spread":0.19551892632279705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255463919","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000059701997,0.00043440642,0.00006420494,0.000081560655,0.00044787198,0.00023895776,0.0000884288,0.00018067234,0.9984042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019423654,0.0010534916,0.000023479723,0.000105517305,0.00072409475,6.8022626e-7,0.000018971594,0.000012274826,0.99611914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998697,0.00008597681,0.00011348636,0.00032194974,0.0004376981,0.0003439196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932194,0.0000805937,0.00012563905,0.00016814741,0.00014467046,0.00015902054],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010452381,0.00020499519,0.0002947176,0.00010266702,0.0018730888,0.000033628083,0.00044937123,0.000284077,0.000004215644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027332922,0.00024633968,0.0001904376,0.000020560914,0.0015382466,0.00008667534,0.00023331655,0.0003269681,0.000045026776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000112636035,0.00000487621,0.0000077137865,0.000006027137,0.000059744034,0.00018535725,0.00032382263,3.2191633e-7,5.897039e-7,0.7515534,0.24742573,0.00042111854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015524252,0.000008594729,0.000050090883,0.00008170863,0.00008168599,0.000003038147,0.0002473881,8.104309e-7,0.000003939967,0.00006884085,0.99901426,0.00028438203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058643664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000104668165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7515885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006095021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013394284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255464247","doi":"10.1332/251569209x15664518847303","title":"Testing the ‘Veil of Ignorance’ Hypothesis in Constitutional Choice: A «Walk-Talk» Approach","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; Test (biology); Power (physics); Epistemology; Computer science; Veil of ignorance; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08404966784928031,"score_gpt":0.2902641150848055,"score_spread":0.20621444723552518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255464247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8351098,0.008447753,0.00052925316,0.039964296,0.00037647184,0.0002580332,0.000015360294,0.00001955056,0.1152795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975522,0.00056608213,0.0006124831,0.0005324912,0.0006563019,0.0000056578388,6.3453865e-7,0.0000025072409,0.000071627626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981659,0.00014468169,0.00054005726,0.00015869786,0.0006123443,0.00037831304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975761,0.0010412304,0.0005288562,0.0000987534,0.00065737526,0.000097668264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018722095,0.00012738575,0.00033137487,0.00018722618,0.0006586001,0.00015084454,0.00042172312,0.000090830064,0.00001970191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00536276,0.00008990749,0.000097777505,0.0012117453,0.0017546816,0.0009032447,0.00003898728,0.0003096419,0.0000011604956],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001555485,0.00043684922,0.17716908,0.000012856651,0.00005396371,0.000008771911,0.0011782445,0.000039060327,0.00011036558,0.7082235,0.0015073213,0.11124443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008121763,0.00011030896,0.7416702,0.0000960973,0.000021451637,0.000049734474,0.0025250793,0.000042025233,0.0000055352825,0.027724838,0.22676347,0.00017909818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001639849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009835955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68049866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009694673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011586462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6465197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255801062","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.1.65","title":"THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF AN EXTERMINATORY LEGALITY: LAW AND THE HOLOCAUST","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Law; Nazism; The Holocaust; Political science; Judaism; Impossibility; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics; Theology","score_opus":0.011502320031210907,"score_gpt":0.2558543895657031,"score_spread":0.2443520695344922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255801062","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35279968,0.0040435772,0.000033851735,0.0046079867,0.00016815905,0.000121316785,0.000006435201,0.000009550024,0.63820946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989595,0.00071110553,0.000041233834,0.00012386378,0.000069154594,1.4672021e-8,7.734371e-8,4.9810933e-7,0.00009458807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929166,0.00023414,0.00009050441,0.000060587285,0.00021809478,0.00010498975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951726,0.000097669596,0.00011220864,0.00007700538,0.00013699713,0.000058851798],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010878233,0.000039861632,0.00010773828,0.0000026641428,0.0030833986,0.000028631197,0.00023520052,0.00003085887,0.000037212154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002982116,0.000025395686,0.00006296058,0.000016388009,0.004135294,0.00035777767,0.000033723336,0.00007851305,2.5983513e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013196874,0.000027384116,0.00017869791,6.480837e-7,0.000018490016,0.000003945509,0.005651711,5.856572e-7,0.0000095248,0.9880636,0.000057127243,0.0058563645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026848565,0.0003830977,0.11232584,0.000058532063,0.00019380343,0.000028064356,0.17087135,0.000020185635,0.000059320246,0.39109167,0.32204804,0.00023521643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23906294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4699548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64615977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008596563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000074982134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99857485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256167964","doi":"10.22145/flr.45.4.11","title":"Lisa Burton Crawford The Rule of Law and the Australian Constitution - Janina Boughey Human Rights and Judicial Review in Australia and Canada: The Newest Despotism?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.05260209595554128,"score_gpt":0.3407976567241885,"score_spread":0.2881955607686472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256167964","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09481094,0.40383905,0.0000013331545,0.24482879,0.0009024856,0.0046447287,0.00009290452,0.000025653088,0.2508541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9377183,0.0579211,0.000005691564,0.0037098213,0.00015176552,0.000055228353,0.0000026723064,0.0000023211073,0.0004331498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985995,0.00032510157,0.00035210096,0.0001912115,0.00029390556,0.00023816024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992644,0.0001378337,0.0002488115,0.00020793502,0.00007540807,0.0000655881],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012973086,0.00014928765,0.00043979913,0.0000052985065,0.0062533193,0.00016764093,0.0002918975,0.000046079378,0.000060886832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014660643,0.000072053146,0.000054308217,0.000052585605,0.0064359284,0.00018879115,0.00011957782,0.00017855475,0.0000016655382],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066315165,0.000006424916,0.0009584182,0.00029071778,0.000020250376,0.0000044500503,0.00016307701,3.82992e-8,8.380809e-7,0.99346447,0.004750278,0.00033439035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033669514,0.000016312384,0.017302994,0.0051103225,0.00015311905,0.000010510876,0.000042631287,1.18780086e-7,0.000003392656,0.030739242,0.9461546,0.0001300458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9808962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98032445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9627252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051883155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015465252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280581348","doi":"10.1017/s0008423922000452","title":"The Overturning of<i>Roe v. Wade</i>: Are Abortion Rights in Canada Vulnerable?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Retrenchment; Abortion; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Politics; Context (archaeology); Human rights; Criminology; Sociology; Public administration; Geography","score_opus":0.01317008898947907,"score_gpt":0.25153655045683476,"score_spread":0.23836646146735568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280581348","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95836246,0.0004897494,0.000008495729,0.013788925,0.0012049107,0.000060804072,0.000021430635,0.0000013286799,0.026061907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99938536,0.0000053609438,0.0000084716075,0.00042752613,0.00012144602,0.0000015874538,7.8316205e-8,9.1524436e-7,0.00004923093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980281,0.00016095229,0.00025965268,0.000080607504,0.0007848826,0.00068581715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986632,0.00027066912,0.00013206835,0.000051847506,0.00022336845,0.0006588798],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018076937,0.000045586716,0.00011230608,0.00009888272,0.0038427212,0.000042441563,0.0004999883,0.000010797587,0.00009189087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012428554,0.000033448196,0.00003205358,0.00072068546,0.0014927374,0.00014889869,0.000027960752,0.00029494587,5.4436464e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022725267,0.000002940668,0.035558414,4.5656714e-7,0.0000023935343,0.000049243346,0.0004483499,0.000111258,0.000013442036,0.96314126,0.00045710092,0.00021285204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001458135,0.000041539904,0.7630857,0.000037133457,0.000008582626,0.000027840528,0.021892093,0.00003690031,0.00007075882,0.08210197,0.13242692,0.00012472109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.998771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8810393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031005843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02987239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99745417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285061047","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4123003","title":"Notwithstanding Judicial Specification: The Notwithstanding Clause within a Juridical Order","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Fulbright Canada; University of Toronto; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Law; Dependent clause; Political science; Linguistics; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.027201831946222575,"score_gpt":0.28929102272875545,"score_spread":0.2620891907825329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285061047","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48922896,0.021326043,0.03899897,0.17338055,0.010421241,0.0018545463,0.0000511243,0.00048075363,0.2642578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99458677,0.001803369,0.000038516875,0.00046298568,0.0020072686,0.000021899856,0.0000017415227,0.00001314746,0.0010642881],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960911,0.00042638884,0.00035399568,0.00022695464,0.0012112212,0.0016903254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992195,0.00016735955,0.00024008066,0.000119412776,0.00015136455,0.00010231544],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052605793,0.00014107452,0.00018087009,0.0000966771,0.010416166,0.00015109003,0.0005678615,0.00004707345,0.00038731835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033696144,0.00010645912,0.00011603442,0.0008902449,0.00060818245,0.00018575182,0.00014029758,0.0023322206,0.000028098715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000901341,0.000044110948,0.0017844451,4.2343714e-7,0.00009971169,0.000007886984,0.0058011343,0.00009903417,0.000026249669,0.98995894,0.00064225745,0.0014456427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051534484,0.00018025032,0.0005073304,0.0000111631,0.00007032128,0.00018410149,0.113568105,0.00002999504,0.0000077233735,0.7077184,0.17695,0.00025729588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013973505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01040326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5053578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00291166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006423772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285086968","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v15n3p37","title":"Optimising the UK and Commonwealth Constitutions","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Political science; History; Law","score_opus":0.03740086280457678,"score_gpt":0.317281861095308,"score_spread":0.2798809982907312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285086968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48485935,0.010014872,0.00024570277,0.0742122,0.001011898,0.00014103083,0.000053404416,0.000009388495,0.42945215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977244,0.00039880443,0.00006643612,0.0015559595,0.0001869732,6.177531e-7,1.3273515e-7,7.897374e-7,0.00006584845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947613,0.00007255323,0.00011117486,0.000028143446,0.00019360923,0.0001184123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996492,0.00012572683,0.000071097595,0.000020838437,0.00006488834,0.000068241716],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000557872,0.000027190685,0.000070541195,0.000017651451,0.0036172883,0.000046789402,0.00006282307,0.000008989589,0.000033523007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044937315,0.000018838828,0.000022346521,0.000053214913,0.0011383797,0.00003892176,0.00006495054,0.00012613517,1.792461e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000164544,0.0000085545735,0.0012255728,6.4574795e-7,0.000012229552,0.000004483481,0.0015051762,0.000016034843,0.0000024860894,0.99655956,0.00055123586,0.0001123557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017922388,0.000065985274,0.002056156,0.000010914242,0.000038805923,0.000101980404,0.018536067,0.0000077185505,0.0000027832025,0.23334266,0.74560463,0.000053083695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006000911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009181622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7632169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040347182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019615504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285162040","doi":"10.47348/salj/v139/i2a4","title":"‘I beg to differ’: Are our courts too agreeable?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Dissent; Appeal; Law; Political science; Supreme court; Majority opinion","score_opus":0.030339795035629332,"score_gpt":0.2747571318407989,"score_spread":0.24441733680516958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285162040","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26779085,0.0009764279,0.0003546839,0.094453886,0.0042820075,0.0004900405,0.00032496915,0.00016355774,0.63116354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949907,0.000011105788,0.000072912786,0.0024197581,0.001219287,0.000021368101,9.37893e-7,0.000007449743,0.0012564881],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979794,0.00021944311,0.00020754909,0.00017537741,0.0009399841,0.00047823015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922687,0.000046274414,0.00015398487,0.00008587648,0.0001389839,0.00034803108],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068606104,0.00011120204,0.00020080479,0.00006671529,0.0073413523,0.00013452799,0.00038406454,0.000026757214,0.00039487795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018092712,0.00010151745,0.00012342824,0.0003367566,0.00020104843,0.00009517154,0.00019962048,0.0003660059,0.000082878054],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001177262,0.00017116612,0.023267305,0.000002593541,0.00014385852,0.0002710939,0.06078298,0.00038880165,0.000022402903,0.85222936,0.0604183,0.0021844045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023579228,0.000096048316,0.0058982205,0.0000111483905,0.000030306874,0.00002536765,0.22871347,0.0000012170723,0.0000027988012,0.027754627,0.73701066,0.00022033048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032919268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003923799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82447475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003090745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022982512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99395096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285201175","doi":"10.1093/icon/moac034","title":"The gatekeepers: Executive lawyers and the executive power in comparative constitutional law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Separation of powers; Constitution; Constitutional law; Law; Constitutionalism; Executive power; Political science; Power (physics); Executive order; Law and economics; Sociology; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.025721722348032324,"score_gpt":0.31601420501732164,"score_spread":0.2902924826692893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285201175","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0077688033,0.00461788,0.0005572279,0.044924513,0.00413434,0.0003810041,0.00022041283,0.000019201489,0.9373766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99616253,0.00033293696,0.00006708815,0.0027779047,0.00035765066,0.000047287056,0.0000068854624,0.0000026243954,0.00024510623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965482,0.0006442137,0.00062180596,0.00019122112,0.0017053765,0.00028919804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966314,0.0018124457,0.00041872915,0.00007637641,0.00095919747,0.00010185562],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022088473,0.00016531277,0.0003043216,0.0001023736,0.0037387887,0.00019581061,0.0007533919,0.0000470122,0.00016584372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030607506,0.000110020876,0.0001943574,0.00023257527,0.03889661,0.00045935254,0.00027423463,0.00058915606,0.000009346522],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00093664473,0.00009302974,0.00050613453,4.2068692e-7,0.0003328624,0.00008903385,0.0037072143,0.00073778856,0.000009633751,0.99200493,0.0015131474,0.000069185095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021955282,0.000048692647,0.00034686326,0.000038105358,0.000031036736,0.00026998966,0.017037135,0.00001697773,0.000012752752,0.23678122,0.74307674,0.00014491742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002634473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027452318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9883937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059402006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014254283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99755824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285359770","doi":"10.46692/9781447359531.007","title":"Politics as an alternative to constitutionalization","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law and economics; Political economy; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.04422593835022704,"score_gpt":0.3636964436512595,"score_spread":0.3194705053010325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285359770","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001492351,0.00045171403,0.0019508501,0.001512459,0.00076864014,0.00018296923,0.000039768016,0.00010715353,0.9949715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008909609,0.00036370588,0.0005748322,0.0026187897,0.0025157705,0.000019500809,0.000089192195,0.000032240256,0.98487633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909794,0.0000701565,0.00008595907,0.00020487109,0.00036723487,0.00017380851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957794,0.000024072457,0.000039997067,0.00007299251,0.00014188321,0.00014312065],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000077495395,0.0000973877,0.00013584887,0.00008155496,0.00036768112,0.00004551499,0.00012607813,0.000109721565,0.017163007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018999705,0.00009492499,0.000034708955,0.0001787697,0.00048634893,0.00003046568,0.000043418942,0.00004661551,0.00039461564],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.8114305e-7,0.000020876887,0.00008044602,0.0000015290876,0.00003007191,0.000006087858,0.00042433376,0.0000019667957,5.690845e-7,0.85590637,0.14337932,0.00014797646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003851013,0.000009949293,0.000029330393,0.000062052546,0.00001043625,6.0143475e-7,0.0011734673,5.11185e-7,0.0000042567713,0.04725855,0.9512811,0.00013126961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.121815465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054964803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8086478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010446517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081444846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98373544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285389506","doi":"10.1017/cls.2022.7","title":"The Elusive Quest for French on the Bench: Bilingualism Scores for Canadian Supreme Court Justices, 1985–2013","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Neuroscience of multilingualism; Normative; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Agreement; Construct (python library); Sociology; Psychology; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.02904320012190632,"score_gpt":0.28118169998378995,"score_spread":0.25213849986188364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285389506","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46770796,0.012213349,0.00011679436,0.43935362,0.009272399,0.003335404,0.0048326957,0.000027752285,0.06314005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854363,0.0005734932,0.0000678833,0.01156871,0.001125389,0.0001189607,0.000020376126,0.000018023247,0.0010708311],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812657,0.0001674933,0.0003648539,0.00022178478,0.00020493944,0.0009143864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99633926,0.0015928568,0.000269414,0.00014726594,0.00061096664,0.0010402628],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028570725,0.0001718003,0.00028932517,0.000054709046,0.013108322,0.00022089206,0.000599079,0.00010184634,0.00009854066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007996239,0.00013600668,0.0003539528,0.00019922297,0.0013509638,0.000121335564,0.000026505653,0.00044440795,6.5401974e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006458187,0.0000054442094,0.00010944756,0.00001007188,0.00013705317,0.000013678466,0.0382702,0.00005550334,0.0000015626998,0.92081726,0.040001787,0.0005715157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030129348,0.00016632445,0.00030412828,0.000038356087,0.00010775588,0.000021397813,0.07838051,0.000054187964,0.000001344322,0.08620991,0.8342222,0.0001926023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94895256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83460736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018359933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073239566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285721789","doi":"10.7202/1088749ar","title":"À la découverte des configurations de la légalité","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Sociologie et sociétés","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.38293153198089747,"score_gpt":0.5030726552960203,"score_spread":0.12014112331512283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285721789","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061580706,0.017144516,0.0016129671,0.23203854,0.001520872,0.00023838555,0.00012482003,0.0002720695,0.6854671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97919345,0.012313169,0.00043826344,0.0058945445,0.0007795052,0.0000392103,0.000009662034,0.000011986182,0.00132021],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99645853,0.0022443251,0.00024635674,0.00029498147,0.00024509447,0.0005107003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99718875,0.0023052595,0.000101999336,0.000076542514,0.00012279226,0.00020464597],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012855261,0.00020218006,0.0003093634,0.000012538486,0.0014599172,0.00008917267,0.00029559457,0.0005471023,0.001893597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020554,0.00020032404,0.00025643778,0.00026843284,0.009911364,0.00022890184,0.00011736875,0.000625,0.00031467705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010201097,0.00007582977,0.006359314,0.00002134997,0.00018350079,0.000021214322,0.04088853,0.00003540836,0.00016610003,0.9116226,0.025083182,0.015532764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030914703,0.00006851779,0.018354483,0.000041388696,0.000106601656,0.0000026813582,0.05804224,0.000031732547,0.00002515122,0.67182505,0.25091216,0.00028085615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026208407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016048223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91761273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030377088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010889095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289022272","doi":"","title":"Les rapports entre cours suprêmes et législateurs dans les systèmes constitutionnels de common law - Recherches comparées sur la troisième voie du constitutionnalisme et la protection renouvelée des droits et libertés (États-Unis, Canada, Royaume-Uni)","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Commonwealth; Legislature; Law; Political science; Human rights; Common law; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.04179212865284661,"score_gpt":0.2753387836118521,"score_spread":0.2335466549590055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289022272","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5093419,0.004534852,0.04571123,0.047422577,0.00093509397,0.0017799151,0.0008534035,0.00046548626,0.38895553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.983549,0.0053901887,0.0027423468,0.00044262793,0.00007305805,0.00021582127,0.00063295796,0.000058327805,0.0068956544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96664363,0.028882973,0.0011680094,0.001197846,0.0011627531,0.0009447971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878292,0.0067176125,0.0011465345,0.0010048742,0.0028465053,0.0004552758],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014762504,0.00088769017,0.0011390247,0.00020057861,0.004459399,0.0009093063,0.001395805,0.0008837206,0.00011670963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002536307,0.00095607026,0.0004279297,0.0007597991,0.010627227,0.0007394345,0.0008990881,0.001754551,0.000023215824],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050390412,0.0006752086,0.02347863,0.00020575462,0.00034676935,0.00004299987,0.048512526,0.0027982278,0.00026153162,0.91777915,0.0013680828,0.0044807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037783151,0.000015483945,0.1170116,0.020022148,0.0011176926,0.00053238677,0.031250652,0.0055896277,0.0069992123,0.2582652,0.55119985,0.004217832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9160039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9453505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65951395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019667402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010262096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289718828","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198861577.003.0004","title":"Pipelines to High Courts","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.03976459824294891,"score_gpt":0.29157568817270363,"score_spread":0.2518110899297547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289718828","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000015770804,0.0009020762,0.00011119337,0.011014938,0.00091011013,0.00012205296,0.000019954618,0.00006549119,0.9868384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00884515,0.0008696495,0.00019610344,0.0021232679,0.0019916452,0.0000056035205,0.000010200491,0.000007774103,0.9859506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907404,0.000009063649,0.0001361022,0.0002130751,0.00040479528,0.00016291846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994852,0.000057729543,0.00003480873,0.000082655184,0.00023398461,0.00010561848],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011041997,0.00012312579,0.00021449341,0.000037687485,0.00047574603,0.000042287433,0.00012821096,0.00014012784,0.005799411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007740023,0.00011008446,0.00008635216,0.00002597332,0.00025991962,0.000027773978,0.00009522537,0.00008840339,0.0010445033],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015148556,0.0000034651523,0.0000060545126,0.0000010798456,0.000026071682,0.000016130096,0.00022440506,5.5640623e-7,6.977456e-7,0.9509421,0.045135576,0.0036423488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019596646,0.000005569344,0.000020849986,0.000040531035,0.000017080989,2.6366507e-7,0.0001974746,2.4642233e-8,0.0000017873731,0.19083652,0.80872804,0.00013225805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007974565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021622669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7635925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007027889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034058362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289718829","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198861577.001.0001","title":"Reimagining the Judiciary","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.038434298363162,"score_gpt":0.30059895276014564,"score_spread":0.26216465439698367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289718829","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[5.492459e-7,0.004808358,0.000029636982,0.016028352,0.0009052451,0.000095150914,0.0000044035164,0.00006279147,0.9780655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015413342,0.001504955,0.000031892287,0.002657644,0.0028013175,0.000009583158,0.000011126204,0.0000062576387,0.9914359],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990254,0.000066292756,0.00012046771,0.00016608012,0.00043366157,0.00018811447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994334,0.00023034675,0.00005455463,0.000109748,0.00013359162,0.00003833249],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003414715,0.00009840658,0.00016005526,0.000018582889,0.0014417828,0.00006777285,0.00023615937,0.00010877435,0.0019934054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001461362,0.000055488425,0.0001097887,0.00008060372,0.0010380545,0.000040842388,0.00011887508,0.00031392372,0.00030226618],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.3544563e-7,0.0000018182486,0.000014095525,4.6662902e-7,0.000027601809,0.000008685601,0.0004566079,9.986484e-8,6.5103436e-8,0.63079643,0.36688346,0.0018103285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012796116,0.0000014079159,0.000041318446,0.00003615813,0.000022745267,4.8581467e-7,0.0009457221,1.17744925e-7,1.5214006e-7,0.31139287,0.6874769,0.0000693653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009625482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013958749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3205934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012867275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024247046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289925927","doi":"10.3138/cjh-57-2-2021-0126","title":"Lynn Gehl, <i>Gehl v Canada: Challenging Sex Discrimination in the Indian Act</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of History","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.030536616576125244,"score_gpt":0.2438984929021764,"score_spread":0.21336187632605116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289925927","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6535474,0.026522754,0.000022975526,0.053100433,0.005647729,0.0002317981,0.000010321707,0.00001253589,0.260904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980372,0.0001658159,0.0000047200583,0.0011102917,0.00033555538,0.000004338057,4.3429296e-7,0.000001983881,0.00033964636],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988034,0.00019789634,0.00016962347,0.000048655274,0.00065356103,0.00012691272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964416,0.00008760235,0.00015516882,0.000035583347,0.000044542117,0.000032917316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009840413,0.000041687064,0.00009317743,0.00007215581,0.0007664006,0.0000062083413,0.00023596197,0.000013171097,0.00010603218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000085384236,0.000033094228,0.000041867068,0.00010372764,0.0001273173,0.00010007739,0.000027233506,0.00025679453,6.413811e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006366419,0.0003270477,0.01404877,0.000016243219,0.00008617529,0.0013462029,0.5128683,0.0006707451,0.000091172486,0.14400795,0.30752185,0.018951891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011386759,0.000025836205,0.013368668,0.000007969115,0.000008085751,0.000019937668,0.083333366,0.0000010458654,7.476978e-7,0.0011560866,0.9019119,0.0000525035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38938525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7495603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59439003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002644233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018597426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69145775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4291237217","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjac033","title":"From the Ivory Tower to the Courtroom: Cooperative Federalism in the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Federalism; Law; Political science; New Federalism; Supreme Court Decisions; Majority opinion; Term (time); Jurisdiction; Constitution; Separation of powers; Original jurisdiction; Government (linguistics); Politics","score_opus":0.026826196433593217,"score_gpt":0.2686306425056153,"score_spread":0.2418044460720221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4291237217","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2975435,0.001924979,0.000032628683,0.68312895,0.0015811872,0.00041646376,0.00009130826,0.0000043553146,0.015276633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97819364,0.00014005537,0.000008156743,0.02005631,0.0009869925,0.000023975894,0.0000018862131,0.000005463581,0.0005834973],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957941,0.0016140772,0.00047002066,0.00010643015,0.001665602,0.0003497707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99739915,0.00154913,0.0003304608,0.0002042051,0.0004447584,0.000072321935],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004638525,0.00013242025,0.00025044504,0.000034460572,0.0049700066,0.00024602696,0.0016682221,0.000026156109,0.0003510418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066351617,0.000055483397,0.00010820619,0.000500633,0.00043935428,0.00018823266,0.00023732227,0.0006427615,0.0000015118898],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015334526,0.00009062796,0.0013667414,8.147551e-7,0.00019621164,0.000026815784,0.11877057,0.0019445885,0.00003930608,0.05600211,0.82094127,0.00046759474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033222386,0.000080186655,0.016297117,0.000018483759,0.000052305855,0.000026550679,0.16036423,0.000014301571,0.000012798764,0.010387772,0.8122936,0.000120434815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82637054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9002977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6806502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032954133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021602288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4292307678","doi":"10.1111/raju.12359","title":"Raz and the Rule of (Authoritative) Law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Rule of law; Law; Work (physics); Position (finance); Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Business; Physics","score_opus":0.018574767319440497,"score_gpt":0.28986633409585044,"score_spread":0.2712915667764099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4292307678","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14188683,0.0032948744,0.0001638103,0.038691957,0.00040290316,0.0003241207,0.000039960698,0.000029640125,0.8151659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99884474,0.000072592185,0.0000378065,0.00032302004,0.00007391146,0.000024860983,6.916145e-7,8.359809e-7,0.00062156195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995139,0.00013741938,0.00006326245,0.00004911197,0.00017947124,0.000056834415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973655,0.00016338387,0.000030345152,0.000027309776,0.000030315583,0.000012073539],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041095857,0.000022782075,0.00006190687,0.0000069846374,0.0014834241,0.000010222011,0.000060285034,0.0000067699825,0.00013074931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005779054,0.000016286018,0.000021021327,0.000094378665,0.0009518069,0.00003771783,0.00005350888,0.00004171007,0.0000027210895],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012801304,0.0000076946035,0.00020887266,4.3732632e-7,0.000011431622,2.8766576e-7,0.017178725,0.0000033127635,0.000015257781,0.9813517,0.0007280883,0.00048141103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046278402,0.000027991193,0.0025682617,0.0000020223877,0.000022868995,4.1584622e-7,0.026437866,0.000013656405,0.00007901642,0.36489344,0.60542595,0.000065726876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012929503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014277616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85695785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014904093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056010835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294308144","doi":"10.1093/he/9780191948909.003.0064","title":"Re Resolution to Amend the Constitution of Canada [1981] 1 SCR 753, also known as the Patriation Reference, Supreme Court of Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03299280417196766,"score_gpt":0.22286751207730326,"score_spread":0.18987470790533562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294308144","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00047863106,0.00016796072,0.000020000874,0.0018624993,0.00040738747,0.0005706241,0.00069994247,0.000012678485,0.9957803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48860902,0.00072920386,0.000015576936,0.00028675704,0.00017087496,0.000004846433,0.00005188011,0.000008669286,0.5101232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815357,0.0001423209,0.00023622665,0.00022710448,0.0009969047,0.00024386792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871826,0.00021633005,0.00036498054,0.00023148317,0.000382013,0.00008691702],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038712693,0.00016277176,0.00026428915,0.000053061343,0.0020816007,0.000013545593,0.0005379314,0.00010779036,0.00015712169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007686525,0.00013381083,0.00007436977,0.000043726795,0.00081582274,0.00005776314,0.00022673502,0.00027289856,1.2720162e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010242153,0.0000039603715,0.000013887778,0.000008563436,0.00010467704,0.000008350008,0.00093002827,0.00017711932,0.00000334896,0.9769085,0.021314994,0.00042412555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012562137,0.00003403524,0.00007161871,0.00005829849,0.00011967741,4.529367e-7,0.003247683,0.000005079924,0.000013634815,0.0030949633,0.9930829,0.00014605562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99282354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99815166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97381353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00113098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007978927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99921757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294811563","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0116","title":"What is purposive interpretation?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Presupposition; Doctrine; Epistemology; Nonprobability sampling; Constitutional interpretation; Set (abstract data type); Law; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.010967684414629992,"score_gpt":0.24340022694349536,"score_spread":0.23243254252886536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294811563","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019125529,0.008668974,0.00048112433,0.0109914895,0.0022632356,0.0002032007,0.00002436324,0.000024303572,0.9582178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964725,0.0018049716,0.000089256246,0.00030551484,0.000077560064,1.220566e-7,5.4936885e-7,9.864605e-7,0.0012485802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940866,0.00009575564,0.000054186217,0.00005550026,0.00029438655,0.000091492046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969715,0.00002688519,0.0000809495,0.000028844262,0.000113674745,0.000052514744],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018972259,0.00003053623,0.000069113055,0.0000086448,0.003175779,0.000030664738,0.00020301026,0.000012799879,0.006175435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000061302767,0.00003640421,0.000072846764,0.000025892607,0.00032467875,0.0007196638,0.00009538763,0.00007844338,0.0000054424636],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011229713,0.000070700575,0.00061446195,0.0000012459042,0.00012433507,0.000038573504,0.13290721,0.000052719017,0.00001931539,0.84304726,0.008598229,0.014413645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015082517,0.00004654842,0.00038915497,0.000009392739,0.000020004336,0.0000050386416,0.27764437,0.0000061645846,0.00000308016,0.0073980875,0.7142802,0.00004715237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12962215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15633959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97734696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041452632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000105270854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298282242","doi":"10.3138/9781442602458","title":"The Charter Revolution and the Court Party","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.018208726089084547,"score_gpt":0.2133911515406289,"score_spread":0.19518242545154435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4298282242","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00000884676,0.009625886,0.000014321598,0.00068210927,0.00018337065,0.0003451677,0.000015618685,0.00001608566,0.9891086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001905652,0.007784839,0.000008687735,0.000035893754,0.00021223315,0.0000010523063,0.00000166428,0.0000025969828,0.9900474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930716,0.000117275675,0.000073697825,0.00011701028,0.00025106771,0.00013381592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938124,0.00019113273,0.00013076015,0.00011840241,0.00013942087,0.00003906307],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028264272,0.00008409311,0.00015977217,0.0000029028179,0.0017474476,0.000026416268,0.00028388176,0.00010641477,0.00005669075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021394178,0.000054828575,0.00008067457,7.6466506e-7,0.003640072,0.00007087,0.00014682308,0.000092152586,0.000005569213],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043856413,0.0000022656225,0.0000034447185,0.000004286044,0.000081011654,6.1215803e-7,0.009716277,6.529869e-8,2.2910537e-7,0.8290877,0.15721154,0.003848715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023245568,0.000008033539,0.00011810332,0.00003499966,0.00008174684,1.5959549e-7,0.0009254672,0.0000033856047,1.9940786e-7,0.013077857,0.98544955,0.00006805328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47088045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24349555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.828238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001776913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018956819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4299717491","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511576713","title":"Criminal Disenfranchisement in an International Perspective","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Constitutionalism; Law; Politics; Voting; Prison; Human rights; Doctrine; Criminal law; Democracy","score_opus":0.03248200771265298,"score_gpt":0.27420566769986043,"score_spread":0.24172365998720746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4299717491","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005761135,0.00013722616,0.000028951497,0.00016034942,0.00033027132,0.00027359673,0.000080095386,0.00005843719,0.998355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015542318,0.00026823534,0.000027684277,0.00013570838,0.00067470013,0.0000011698102,0.000032786866,0.0000070282344,0.98331034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873435,0.00010000126,0.00011697133,0.00036548168,0.00043815048,0.0002450676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935347,0.000035384568,0.000094069976,0.00013124617,0.00026237083,0.00012343183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012816381,0.00017415092,0.00022069257,0.00016125904,0.00045393928,0.000051208528,0.00052120746,0.00016641975,0.000008678498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026977621,0.00021455945,0.000109838045,0.00001795211,0.0006342425,0.00019117829,0.00012678429,0.00028508826,0.000007723511],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006851993,0.00004373645,0.0000518983,0.0000032048886,0.000042746185,0.00015499325,0.0021330006,0.0000024422984,9.2261536e-7,0.979678,0.016879916,0.0009406665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033577395,0.000041588464,0.0016572694,0.00008474426,0.000081616265,6.8274585e-7,0.004646585,0.000004148049,0.0000018781469,0.0005788501,0.9922949,0.000271977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009294753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013436584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9790991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019111601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007322562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4300444709","doi":"","title":"ENGINEERING CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGE – A Comparative Perspective on Europe, Canada and the USA – Routledge Research in Constitutional Law, pp. 478., 2013. Published by: Routledge and the Taylor &amp; Francis Group Edited by: prof. dr. sc. XENOPHON CONTIADES","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hrčak Portal of scientific journals of Croatia (University Computing Centre)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07755330925632452,"score_gpt":0.3045290900596362,"score_spread":0.22697578080331166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4300444709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9103584,0.009813406,0.0014865039,0.041007392,0.0026431915,0.0019287108,0.0006404011,0.00003391591,0.03208806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994197,0.00009335443,0.000039450035,0.0000602144,0.00014985453,6.6420205e-7,0.000024355415,0.0000028752108,0.00020954799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970078,0.00057256874,0.00035139342,0.0003678327,0.0012857724,0.00041462944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966611,0.0009214561,0.00034719936,0.00012635504,0.0017279475,0.00021593244],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043858094,0.00016574515,0.00044474856,0.00019006676,0.0018118445,0.00023080959,0.00040820442,0.00006688954,0.000043113858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005996358,0.00012507898,0.000064514934,0.0011490041,0.02091905,0.00053282717,0.00024063783,0.00042904596,0.000003705733],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002996491,0.000116490686,0.006436971,0.000009202411,0.00011715601,0.000013470451,0.015928151,0.00010373806,0.000076632874,0.9405201,0.036329266,0.00004914733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.046369586,0.0002893341,0.07812225,0.0023440686,0.000536713,0.000120657685,0.32365486,0.014334926,0.00027494074,0.024660656,0.5068875,0.002404541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.452843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4383135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91585946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028671048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087889336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99948764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4300920754","doi":"10.3138/9781442684980-009","title":"6 The Supreme Court of Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02502128237963722,"score_gpt":0.2058027702572974,"score_spread":0.18078148787766019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4300920754","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000015096827,0.004507143,0.0000031315672,0.00011103357,0.00019146505,0.00012471217,0.000070040354,0.000008525808,0.99496883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011262831,0.005708205,0.000014687172,0.000012560412,0.000086880405,8.324392e-8,0.0000014508272,0.000003734783,0.98290956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992022,0.000021381908,0.0000967718,0.000104112674,0.0004403154,0.00013521865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993368,0.000101524165,0.00016643228,0.000115966504,0.00022528673,0.00005401697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008163382,0.00008795762,0.00019052024,0.0000037329141,0.00095114455,0.0000032751434,0.0003632963,0.00009103525,0.000101241574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013910658,0.00008340495,0.000087438486,5.256451e-7,0.001407188,0.000029459145,0.00010879098,0.00006750856,4.7555125e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035823174,0.0000032349565,0.000007683336,0.000005908214,0.00015351624,0.000012271039,0.005301611,0.000001207474,0.0000011832228,0.92682624,0.065610714,0.002040589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000723355,0.000010594004,0.0000634425,0.000036475565,0.00003979224,2.2031611e-7,0.0004940352,3.3313916e-7,0.000004845336,0.0011247266,0.9980696,0.00008362417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9971923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9324589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033399768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012756478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7315531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4301054014","doi":"10.54648/erpl2009024","title":"The Legal Power","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Review of Private Law/Revue européenne de droit privé/Europäische Zeitschrift für Privatrecht","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.016885968433102607,"score_gpt":0.28577985198950434,"score_spread":0.26889388355640176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4301054014","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058481772,0.068593286,0.0007078733,0.028260011,0.000930087,0.001202042,0.000027439448,0.00044663425,0.89398444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80152446,0.17470242,0.002128404,0.014523762,0.0017453248,0.000025091307,0.000031894142,0.00014711221,0.005171527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920813,0.002870233,0.0016731452,0.0009072462,0.0010451828,0.001422914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960353,0.0005904495,0.0009161548,0.0014070604,0.00056103343,0.00049000216],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066181724,0.00062219804,0.00095859787,0.000105490806,0.0021669148,0.00025893052,0.0028816084,0.00012058104,0.00023622885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037553466,0.0005217427,0.0006496979,0.0012764442,0.0017100084,0.0005311372,0.00065230974,0.000995086,0.00082773244],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038625887,0.00017334775,0.00015112829,0.00024871543,0.00010143766,0.0002030319,0.000571485,0.0000034034624,0.0006571503,0.96643054,0.0059126015,0.025508543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039253276,0.00023468693,0.005327202,0.002919557,0.00014928731,0.000057525514,0.00012549866,0.00000296374,0.00020930909,0.006294336,0.98368007,0.00060701394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014482686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053960663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97776747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000068338195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033300382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4302430853","doi":"10.36745/ijca.463","title":"Book Review: Juries, Lay Judges, and Mixed Courts","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Court Administration","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Politics; Law; Public opinion; Political science; Public administration; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.02641709906142968,"score_gpt":0.3510344072385747,"score_spread":0.324617308177145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4302430853","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0125159845,0.31805262,0.0015087626,0.62007207,0.014179551,0.0014091628,0.000521145,0.00012564276,0.031615045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8662935,0.07500914,0.0004366193,0.04266811,0.0037592053,0.00028969286,0.00021793037,0.00002028815,0.011305507],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853635,0.000097727665,0.00027839228,0.00013494844,0.00079777517,0.00015478814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991215,0.000116869094,0.00019767878,0.000040371888,0.00043146012,0.00009213743],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008748984,0.00008099489,0.00011991869,0.000058740854,0.0018250896,0.00013094951,0.00023503382,0.000025369349,0.000951591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030668106,0.00008271316,0.00008413636,0.000058125006,0.00016883966,0.00027717228,0.000060479626,0.00016083544,0.00000501383],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010117205,0.00007347927,0.00037624428,0.000007562884,0.00009807413,0.000029121065,0.00039311958,0.0000060640746,0.000023591037,0.08479589,0.9104759,0.0036197852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026184678,0.00011510282,0.0004332396,0.00004214102,0.000033716347,0.000108633096,0.0005832649,0.000007706048,0.000020931886,0.010471136,0.98782367,0.000098596734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000069634545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019754955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8537775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024089913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006203022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306822587","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0056","title":"How important are the groundbreaking cases in administrative law?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Administrative law; Deference; Political science; Supreme Court Decisions; Standard of review; Concurring opinion; Judicial review; Context (archaeology); Precedent; Majority opinion; Certiorari; Judicial opinion; Court of record; Original jurisdiction; History","score_opus":0.042128945546095524,"score_gpt":0.2677486533160273,"score_spread":0.2256197077699318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306822587","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32167798,0.0058789817,0.000043211967,0.017978441,0.00071978,0.00023768916,0.00007804304,0.000022658982,0.6533632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999323,0.0002236231,0.00001992892,0.0001020332,0.00008979082,1.3710675e-7,4.1714173e-7,0.0000010397124,0.00024002777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992444,0.00017483579,0.00006975028,0.00006575893,0.00031376522,0.00013148489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996077,0.00008661051,0.00016238034,0.00003666392,0.00006465102,0.00004200808],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037494066,0.00004343111,0.000095202755,0.0000071334407,0.004173017,0.000037620743,0.00023118859,0.000015287662,0.00035900116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002609848,0.00003860086,0.00006535937,0.000040487885,0.0006408764,0.000300454,0.00008950297,0.0001379736,2.434235e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000459034,0.00004213773,0.0060993778,6.599533e-7,0.000029938274,0.0003597249,0.014003746,0.000004446092,0.000003863639,0.97891754,0.00028326694,0.00020936974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019449087,0.00006867329,0.0047327206,0.000012476383,0.000018162198,0.000048254267,0.64130455,0.000001875972,0.0000017520769,0.0057447455,0.34780687,0.00006541205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.50869757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92923737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97317284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004977501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014603212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306855984","doi":"10.1017/9781009158541.009","title":"The Unconstitutional State of Affairs Doctrine","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Adjudication; Legislature; Dispose pattern; Political science; State (computer science); Law; Politics; Government (linguistics); Separation of powers; Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024745137551570665,"score_gpt":0.2221999240245763,"score_spread":0.19745478647300563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306855984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003084267,0.00065689767,0.00002848695,0.00019761175,0.0004672662,0.00027135355,0.0004746213,0.000047176243,0.99782574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019471195,0.0017100443,0.000008255205,0.000019448176,0.00013375316,0.0000012118188,0.000015364862,0.000006377597,0.97863436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987364,0.00006789491,0.00016334487,0.00022233097,0.0005841762,0.00022585446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990911,0.00022539534,0.00021389472,0.00016982721,0.00021557316,0.00008420083],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002657768,0.00015806501,0.00022608251,0.000065469794,0.0023457534,0.00002196093,0.00049328554,0.000073103285,0.000028372708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032579173,0.00015002885,0.0001876929,0.00001644731,0.0032461523,0.000060371458,0.00039698175,0.00029403676,0.000006202806],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064958,0.000005435453,0.0000037165073,0.000005231038,0.0001483577,0.00004750659,0.00012638043,0.000008483932,0.0000013646583,0.9872997,0.010666129,0.0016227362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016125274,0.000019713392,0.00001563901,0.000025584886,0.000077522396,0.000001425304,0.0004199405,6.8921236e-7,0.0000067746823,0.0011747798,0.99793327,0.00016339243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005313579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004782192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98726714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003245546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086037145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309309855","doi":"10.5380/rinc.v9i2.86385","title":"Does Brazil need a notwithstanding clause?","year":2022,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Investigações Constitucionais","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Supreme court; Political science; Judicial activism; Raising (metalworking); Law; Democracy; Style (visual arts); Legislative process; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; History; Engineering","score_opus":0.03916241969176692,"score_gpt":0.29943269193167044,"score_spread":0.2602702722399035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309309855","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41200548,0.062242165,0.0031112086,0.19852029,0.019587768,0.005801738,0.004277791,0.0020085138,0.29244503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98650134,0.0013846713,0.00017660687,0.0052372953,0.001032829,0.00018102267,0.00003906709,0.000038905986,0.005408245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944042,0.0010766849,0.00087852386,0.0009024431,0.0015475891,0.0011905838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975083,0.00067483116,0.00049201667,0.00043597416,0.00022957531,0.000659331],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019766858,0.00054684206,0.0008114362,0.0003092869,0.007928545,0.0004366631,0.000965907,0.00018939564,0.0031579514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013405619,0.0004516241,0.0004141228,0.0017317632,0.0038295728,0.00037695112,0.000929124,0.000969949,0.00024416103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007334307,0.00016472777,0.05067066,0.00007731144,0.00030723008,0.00018976005,0.0137961,0.00015471676,0.0002527345,0.88341266,0.04999624,0.00090448896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000651862,0.00011563829,0.0019981186,0.00033206155,0.0003126661,0.000047322654,0.029855361,0.00010017794,0.000040390558,0.02000463,0.94563466,0.00090712355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036014952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014445708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8956384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001471487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034302843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310256116","doi":"10.1007/s41020-022-00183-8","title":"Examining the living metaphor in the Indian Constitution","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jindal Global Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Constitution; Supreme court; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Constitutionalism; Doctrine; Democracy; Sociology; Law; Constitution of India; Political science; Epistemology; Politics; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.060957793058452836,"score_gpt":0.327253691719669,"score_spread":0.26629589866121617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310256116","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005907375,0.15728402,0.0000059383765,0.016415339,0.0005677241,0.0008731031,0.000042562016,0.00003487645,0.81886905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810141,0.006881604,0.000008651133,0.011787586,0.00013008044,0.00014656303,0.0000022303875,0.0000010669136,0.000028174622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979865,0.00089339964,0.00020126523,0.00014472079,0.0005440932,0.00023002019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995087,0.00023251661,0.00008062634,0.00011899385,0.00003056457,0.000028599929],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028634884,0.00007819071,0.00016849274,0.000007883563,0.0027050048,0.000051714997,0.0004430124,0.000018431469,0.00028770632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003847394,0.00004572389,0.00007561251,0.000733348,0.0007298895,0.00008678954,0.0001562752,0.00018555559,0.000038582064],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.706413e-7,0.000020006873,0.0018638516,0.000015350717,0.0000107048645,0.000011162517,0.0010121807,0.0000031537695,1.02327824e-7,0.9898393,0.0009843925,0.006238786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030704865,0.000014758102,0.004491612,0.00023263376,0.000036103327,0.000012230177,0.004545548,2.5631866e-7,3.1334622e-8,0.005767618,0.98479825,0.00007022587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022972232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021493675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98407173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021276099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024136272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99859333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310495315","doi":"10.51952/9781529222036.ch066","title":"Access to Justice","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Bristol University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07831575039139946,"score_gpt":0.2800252914260443,"score_spread":0.20170954103464486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310495315","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000010837425,0.00016455716,0.00006888604,0.00043757688,0.0005861376,0.00037895207,0.00015992849,0.00011697318,0.99807614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025462795,0.00025369364,0.000028859118,0.00044388275,0.00033754157,0.0000017724393,0.000008755727,0.000012199731,0.99636704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876946,0.000050446575,0.000101154976,0.000332331,0.00051322783,0.0002333959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934644,0.00007668727,0.00010586543,0.00016195471,0.00013790073,0.0001711579],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001232055,0.00016520606,0.00023281458,0.000109408895,0.0021246357,0.00006735793,0.00083165313,0.00013166163,0.0004695743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030432293,0.0002179628,0.0001240514,0.000017430539,0.000480448,0.00011486173,0.00090369524,0.00026798926,0.00003968047],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042547472,0.000005649551,0.0000024587468,0.000009077521,0.00005864094,0.00013444315,0.0009255503,0.0000060676534,3.2915096e-7,0.9548345,0.04177398,0.0022067495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009189719,0.000016019896,0.000016258038,0.00002857472,0.00023265081,8.573229e-7,0.00044310762,1.9765334e-7,7.414368e-7,0.0038666213,0.9950408,0.0002622935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022356153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003003741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9532668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004835581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038658408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311446111","doi":"10.1515/ijld-2022-2072","title":"Politics behind the law: unveiling the discursive strategies in extradition hearings on Meng Wanzhou","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Legal Discourse","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Social Science Fund of China; Zhejiang University","keywords":"Politics; Cognitive reframing; Injustice; Adjudication; Power (physics); Context (archaeology); Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.027032623383448497,"score_gpt":0.3498941774991905,"score_spread":0.322861554115742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311446111","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71644753,0.00051161513,0.000117721385,0.17809536,0.0029562472,0.00016879824,0.00005858112,0.000009314161,0.10163482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975555,0.000061989806,0.0000094927145,0.0009909077,0.0011521331,0.00000923949,0.0000025351428,0.0000039545475,0.0002142553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981466,0.00021444779,0.000270301,0.00008181497,0.0011142414,0.00017261245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930024,0.00024272338,0.00019946609,0.000052265113,0.00016714336,0.00003816116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079593254,0.00007517565,0.000097718,0.00007239249,0.0011453248,0.0002045952,0.00058362674,0.000016157115,0.00010153417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009011854,0.000045150933,0.00011003357,0.00008811676,0.0007052463,0.00044667046,0.00008147051,0.0004608192,0.0000032222254],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045380497,0.0001016995,0.0004126345,3.4915644e-7,0.00006130824,0.000066768116,0.012075518,0.0031104982,0.000020850288,0.9830469,0.0006034159,0.0004547099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073127245,0.00022430909,0.015467155,0.000104252016,0.000053887088,0.00009235482,0.4076959,0.00007247247,0.000049663064,0.4079724,0.16733015,0.00020620582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009440967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047618398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5750745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003409563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004563622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99715525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311839093","doi":"10.1590/2179-8966/2022/70892","title":"O Constitucionalismo não escrito do Common Law e a Constituição viva","year":2022,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Direito e Práxis","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.044365784634819126,"score_gpt":0.3167376132083097,"score_spread":0.27237182857349057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311839093","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020356433,0.07575459,0.00014620637,0.025822088,0.006863406,0.0023430511,0.0028252774,0.00049419835,0.8653948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901782,0.0014789115,0.000044696244,0.0028876758,0.0011667192,0.0002594672,0.000087738976,0.000034967245,0.0038615798],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938133,0.0011703805,0.0009749792,0.0009968514,0.0019975728,0.0010469237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99762374,0.000622333,0.000443251,0.00055752933,0.00030312806,0.00045004513],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015052678,0.00058238837,0.0010662519,0.00014777156,0.008194629,0.00052413176,0.0011083804,0.00017691213,0.0061221807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002459392,0.0006323414,0.00054546224,0.0012154098,0.0039195046,0.00035396934,0.0012962833,0.000868458,0.00062116096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008868756,0.00037903013,0.0037874258,0.00007568389,0.00026745355,0.00021021275,0.002628187,0.000035916753,0.000050603743,0.94310397,0.047338083,0.002034729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005921844,0.0001301682,0.00026888005,0.00023799665,0.00027174127,0.000045383018,0.007865427,0.000017121482,0.000018925673,0.0144443335,0.9753074,0.00080044963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013648717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020717734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9698218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007678763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011005417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311894268","doi":"10.1590/2179-8966/2021/56463","title":"Dimensões Institucionais da Igualdade de Gênero: o Caso Maria da Penha","year":2022,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Direito e Práxis","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Governo; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.049521300701542606,"score_gpt":0.31992293802078553,"score_spread":0.27040163731924294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311894268","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45029777,0.10702085,0.00033164385,0.055236097,0.008003559,0.0031508112,0.002027916,0.0007742152,0.37315714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852717,0.0021171304,0.00007152442,0.0012483345,0.0012504653,0.00021980381,0.000068127636,0.00003748973,0.009715444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99499834,0.00093026226,0.0007051416,0.0008511784,0.0014510559,0.0010640556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982372,0.00038414166,0.00036973995,0.00044767946,0.00018066919,0.0003805619],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015031914,0.0004764035,0.0007241608,0.00014805276,0.005370185,0.0005042837,0.0009506536,0.00015337372,0.0045205154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005749662,0.0005033352,0.0003958378,0.0012288518,0.0011165511,0.00031452105,0.0012321216,0.00068124227,0.000498146],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015212083,0.0006306595,0.028202232,0.00016709667,0.0005723886,0.00035026093,0.021726478,0.00015941806,0.00034834925,0.81340444,0.12162082,0.012665737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039306303,0.00013611643,0.010208956,0.00012895335,0.00025111742,0.000026747444,0.010677621,0.00003899089,0.000020994576,0.0025407963,0.9748762,0.0007004133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020657457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012461817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8532554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011062704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014042864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312313963","doi":"10.7202/1092797ar","title":"Quelques réflexions sur la constitutionnalisation du droit et le constitutionnalisme au sein de l’État","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Constitution; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.01794479487429476,"score_gpt":0.236706465158373,"score_spread":0.21876167028407822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312313963","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12641002,0.006984182,0.02637765,0.06516888,0.0014512211,0.0005489701,0.000495276,0.00027963426,0.77228415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9725902,0.0022315106,0.00035243173,0.0023308706,0.0005756677,0.00003332039,0.00007723871,0.000018726165,0.02179],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969337,0.00094158575,0.00034697217,0.00048325703,0.00046887883,0.0008256232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985969,0.00039053368,0.0002312703,0.00021188692,0.00021295511,0.00035644197],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016268523,0.00027933612,0.00037927233,0.00017857841,0.004907484,0.000069947186,0.00047548782,0.0002409395,0.00086298963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030263123,0.0004231523,0.00031589842,0.0007518257,0.0030953912,0.0005674913,0.00038108128,0.00056656956,0.000076915174],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009540668,0.00029728594,0.009620681,0.00006244447,0.00019768073,0.00054468494,0.0069375546,0.012446333,0.00025032417,0.9661096,0.0025105646,0.00092746114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010133195,0.00008802182,0.0060744407,0.00024692607,0.00027866734,0.0006644431,0.006742177,0.0011764612,0.00009821871,0.1878937,0.7951879,0.00053571025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08400627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02345128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8461802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011527718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063513718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312395813","doi":"10.20940/jae/2022/v21i1a6","title":"Election petition and the future of electoral reforms in Ghana","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Elections","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Commission; Electoral reform; Supreme Court Decisions; Election law; Voting; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.009739551640304983,"score_gpt":0.2592632649086596,"score_spread":0.2495237132683546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312395813","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9159596,0.0055049863,0.00020460757,0.03281639,0.0012698789,0.000264436,0.00000781464,0.000015379755,0.043956935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990045,0.0003696742,0.000027382877,0.000057013243,0.00041789233,0.000008199906,2.639933e-7,0.0000017437845,0.000113345755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991512,0.00019817294,0.0002042241,0.000045365137,0.00029286958,0.00010817357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995557,0.00006374437,0.00019981626,0.000025121031,0.00013079862,0.00002479074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008106696,0.000037005142,0.00012096293,0.0001440024,0.0009599095,0.000011179226,0.000079137455,0.000016209342,0.000049522063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007048368,0.000025136047,0.00006124499,0.0008343428,0.00029598223,0.00010487947,0.00001850809,0.0002544376,2.0470566e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00088269485,0.00031807963,0.013608299,0.000005132344,0.00015344779,0.000007891756,0.022221653,0.00020719765,0.0006086546,0.9441855,0.0030837692,0.014717708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039538094,0.0016907806,0.108500525,0.000042805073,0.00020833073,0.0003329266,0.2876947,0.000073019386,0.00021140274,0.27794015,0.31899375,0.0003578218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036547882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014317752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66624534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023825836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026194876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79896414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312495895","doi":"10.1590/2317-6172202227","title":"Crítica à interpretação privatista no pensamento tributário brasileiro","year":2022,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Direito GV","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Women's and Gender Studies et Recherches Féministes","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.047264153268751684,"score_gpt":0.32371791703444236,"score_spread":0.2764537637656907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312495895","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06985329,0.062487353,0.0016418765,0.031417917,0.012305389,0.0045867,0.0031497674,0.00074819423,0.8138095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9661096,0.000913545,0.000029686487,0.0012950557,0.00081891054,0.00016698027,0.00006141767,0.000028582606,0.030576224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99553573,0.0007310065,0.00072912726,0.0007458416,0.0014237366,0.0008345807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983113,0.00037457,0.00035450837,0.00043252468,0.00023771804,0.00028937956],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010715838,0.0003934319,0.0007047708,0.00010001824,0.0037656098,0.00038864545,0.0009565716,0.000096699085,0.009895095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008079219,0.00041369107,0.00038793965,0.0008965001,0.0007839232,0.00021296596,0.0011838248,0.0005637192,0.0014475443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024154037,0.0006671775,0.016086752,0.00014694934,0.00047117905,0.00015346702,0.00876203,0.000012029405,0.00017966951,0.7652971,0.19718371,0.010798367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035358974,0.00021578232,0.0031573647,0.00015271868,0.00016008606,0.000006419159,0.003679013,0.00006994921,0.0000063126986,0.0012806716,0.9903829,0.00053519744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024666372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001611633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8962563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009107035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006699118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312615638","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3998389","title":"Enforcing Constitutional Conventions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Computer science; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.012659608719808434,"score_gpt":0.27816561225007047,"score_spread":0.26550600353026205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312615638","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16100253,0.004734061,0.01231964,0.006263046,0.0020916415,0.0002951496,0.000005560141,0.00009268999,0.8131957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99164295,0.0021775076,0.000023984448,0.00015274138,0.00051759515,0.000003047445,0.0000016830553,0.0000025437103,0.0054779425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980433,0.00006523181,0.00015754855,0.00010522586,0.00035595766,0.001272728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996219,0.000057812566,0.000074208445,0.000046507557,0.00013126565,0.00006827039],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012815007,0.00007012493,0.0001058839,0.000058635873,0.0013105526,0.000052108,0.00016159074,0.000047469253,0.0004977234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009633991,0.00006488148,0.00010730908,0.0001652854,0.0006956581,0.00023222443,0.000023036626,0.00065046677,0.00056451996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006844977,0.000016273934,0.010463133,5.027618e-7,0.000063122134,8.8466044e-7,0.00022543967,0.000017373606,0.000024707553,0.9875614,0.000101111225,0.0015191912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031203497,0.000042896718,0.00069154816,0.000017027342,0.000017954933,0.000053876625,0.009736151,0.00000404724,0.0000042040656,0.8470793,0.14192875,0.000112228365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009962765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035612858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83064044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007772792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006013375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312911308","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4291031","title":"The Future of Section 1 in the Law of Judicial Review","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.010375491848507654,"score_gpt":0.27844173409617556,"score_spread":0.2680662422476679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312911308","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06355505,0.73267245,0.000054084896,0.09360636,0.0021181405,0.00058398076,0.000007762878,0.000011334102,0.10739082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8667384,0.13223787,6.361676e-7,0.00034980846,0.00061411236,0.000008776006,2.8187534e-7,0.0000012527319,0.000048878726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998399,0.00043920556,0.00019488722,0.00004600444,0.00046378784,0.00045711818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963987,0.00009002073,0.00015308139,0.00004641535,0.00006161587,0.000009014641],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00479067,0.000037054026,0.000099433506,0.000016466316,0.0016900674,0.000006843671,0.00029133182,0.000014057074,0.000025377696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049968414,0.000021529348,0.00007904202,0.00035391684,0.00028455164,0.00004240416,0.000029220582,0.00077383424,5.1942715e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014165197,0.00002141047,0.00027102194,0.0000026248229,0.000020700934,3.3700545e-7,0.00095394894,0.0000039504453,0.0000055389105,0.99031985,0.00043496554,0.007951476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000097498065,0.000109778484,0.00050876924,0.000029348355,0.00002303825,0.000022527365,0.045327198,2.5841933e-7,0.0000014921591,0.6121803,0.34166574,0.000034038254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044133146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08559689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8031833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028253277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013665505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313018689","doi":"10.21056/aec.v22i89.1655","title":"Constitutional Law Around the Globe: Selection of Justices for the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"A&C - Revista de Direito Administrativoe & Constitucional","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Globe; Selection (genetic algorithm); Computer science","score_opus":0.0329436672377214,"score_gpt":0.3032520376290286,"score_spread":0.2703083703913072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313018689","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.105680555,0.017370747,0.010837523,0.08171034,0.00523003,0.0060126865,0.009053654,0.00016341348,0.76394105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99835736,0.00005283029,0.00013328224,0.00051330234,0.0004971266,0.00019980485,0.000030322344,0.0000037416721,0.00021223704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977822,0.0002465252,0.00045789528,0.00022973209,0.0009522206,0.00033143192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99724156,0.0018025133,0.00032830573,0.0001385749,0.00040533848,0.00008372406],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012059831,0.0001530723,0.00026628893,0.000017701554,0.004121477,0.00005442431,0.00047293716,0.00004152823,0.00048036847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005158899,0.000112175716,0.0001488611,0.00031922892,0.005419331,0.000100690835,0.00007221376,0.00020199064,7.4768457e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010994579,0.00008511081,0.002534827,0.000022050868,0.00016401618,0.0000041157846,0.00026907958,0.00031793938,0.00010319868,0.988518,0.007696543,0.0001751682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030685062,0.000096912176,0.0012767768,0.000035599267,0.00019355096,0.000041549505,0.005248482,0.00009511102,0.0001465382,0.0071845474,0.9852037,0.00017042394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13230695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3796673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98133343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000328785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009938896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99728733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313165900","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-17731-6_1","title":"Historical Themes of Legitimacy","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ontario Institute of Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Curse; Political science; Blessing; Race (biology); Ethnic group; Popularity; Criminology; Sociology; Political economy; Politics; Law; Gender studies; Geography","score_opus":0.05870473145775478,"score_gpt":0.28505089314141546,"score_spread":0.22634616168366067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313165900","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000017835648,0.0033266013,0.0000072892726,0.0022058263,0.0004855281,0.00008962496,0.000008526347,0.000033876473,0.99384093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009355481,0.0013749027,0.00003594823,0.00011194236,0.00040199887,0.0000067372066,0.0000021158278,0.0000056227523,0.9887053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991674,0.00001130614,0.00015140073,0.00012050206,0.00045215376,0.00009723926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967176,0.000079705555,0.000086069296,0.00006226626,0.000067086585,0.000033098164],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010600176,0.00008005659,0.0002098851,0.0000422969,0.0004425155,0.000004685275,0.00015798386,0.00006355461,0.015491602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037878144,0.00007168458,0.0001369865,0.000021758191,0.00039595453,0.000032964537,0.00009358935,0.000116730094,0.00003652536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029022317,0.000007370615,0.000021946633,0.0000016993234,0.000028866865,0.0000030744013,0.0004057507,1.2175221e-7,3.1976782e-7,0.96606326,0.031041186,0.0024235009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019959738,0.00001145667,0.0000062652643,0.000005366508,0.000015442678,1.4735174e-7,0.00014047553,1.5786474e-8,3.142226e-7,0.24096163,0.7587725,0.00006646274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015410964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013169071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7277313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040401774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028456407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9911455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313362473","doi":"10.31078/consrev824","title":"Conflict Resolution in Human Rights Cases: The Role of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Fundamental rights; Law; Supreme court; Political science; International human rights law; Charter; Reservation of rights; Constitution; Right to property","score_opus":0.03832157133479444,"score_gpt":0.3005462988738025,"score_spread":0.26222472753900805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313362473","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038140476,0.36501855,0.00001559275,0.021535508,0.0010428352,0.0020780242,0.00048956485,0.00001851704,0.57166094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99797976,0.0013699316,0.0000027378514,0.00042640205,0.000046569683,0.00005659762,0.000005007982,8.9086495e-7,0.00011212577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838483,0.0003413979,0.00032011126,0.00010445412,0.00070142373,0.00014777444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932563,0.00020912124,0.00016673801,0.00012555828,0.00014574855,0.000027177377],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008973039,0.00006412569,0.00019427027,0.000017636597,0.0020544443,0.000003279065,0.00034303122,0.00001474539,0.00039868505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031486293,0.000040429117,0.000082964194,0.00039518948,0.0025044598,0.000036920414,0.00012598818,0.00013488063,8.5827696e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030838114,0.000023540571,0.002323188,0.000022385953,0.000013208018,0.0000024410267,0.000113023874,0.00006318593,0.000020012107,0.9933057,0.0040077427,0.00010252757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070768394,0.000007802632,0.0027160526,0.0003301047,0.000027167487,0.000007659429,0.00038455782,0.0000026519842,0.000022443843,0.014904874,0.98147166,0.000054244072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6321444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6895277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97840077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003012686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027327396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99924475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4315565271","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-19063-6_15","title":"The Ur-controversy of Civil Justice","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Politics; Civil rights; Quarter (Canadian coin); Population; Face (sociological concept); Law; Civil service; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology; Public service; Social science; Geography","score_opus":0.029808941453130785,"score_gpt":0.2736444974774147,"score_spread":0.24383555602428392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4315565271","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[9.709089e-7,0.0027033312,0.000010282893,0.0035364267,0.00083956687,0.00013105177,0.000026483729,0.000023591458,0.9927283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022906004,0.0062564346,0.0000063204957,0.00041961187,0.00059147546,0.000009137622,0.0000026047449,0.0000059495846,0.96980244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904114,0.000023204233,0.00015588953,0.000116478535,0.000522298,0.00014099474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991451,0.0005111587,0.000116765244,0.0000914113,0.00010387236,0.000031700398],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033016334,0.00008710848,0.00015901317,0.000018585652,0.0018216451,0.00001691775,0.00025179694,0.00006386702,0.0055536213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015569343,0.000060132552,0.00012345782,0.000025264551,0.0010238881,0.000032257132,0.00012205159,0.00014939,0.00005906119],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000812893,0.0000031048414,0.0000033763902,0.0000022406791,0.00006248284,0.0000017167093,0.00032678072,7.8785536e-7,3.169082e-7,0.97326976,0.02467414,0.0016471855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037075395,0.000011361297,0.0000084685935,0.000006241822,0.00008649871,1.2117174e-7,0.0010989974,1.52602e-7,1.7091584e-7,0.21682471,0.78186464,0.00006158728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006006839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03830084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75719047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008402892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033245244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99947786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4315699565","doi":"10.1017/lsi.2022.75","title":"State-Sponsored Activism: How China’s Law Reforms Impact NGOs’ Legal Practice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Social Inquiry","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Legislature; Politics; Political science; State (computer science); China; Public administration; Corporate governance; Law reform; Law; Business","score_opus":0.06619618636423244,"score_gpt":0.38321855633027424,"score_spread":0.31702236996604183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4315699565","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3914663,0.00022258509,0.00004033554,0.057801537,0.0023963414,0.0005119486,0.000103721104,0.00087209407,0.54658514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935225,0.00021746082,0.000027934724,0.00128717,0.002716137,0.00004594334,0.000028236194,0.00002176078,0.0021328398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974548,0.0003592515,0.00021396454,0.0003445071,0.0008368735,0.00079057104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904525,0.00026765405,0.0001773242,0.00013611377,0.00019992032,0.00017373402],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010980775,0.0002270521,0.00033629645,0.000036989553,0.0040636626,0.00035432822,0.0003232874,0.0001825636,0.000059799695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043626383,0.00018992,0.00024351128,0.00082909776,0.0029432755,0.0015402664,0.0001687819,0.00034093397,0.00030451553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014096353,0.00007677812,0.00011192551,0.0000039633837,0.00014426737,0.000056359655,0.032216154,0.0000057797934,0.00012209412,0.9560568,0.009428408,0.0016365553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004434579,0.00010413248,0.017444411,0.000018473822,0.00006591375,0.000003850021,0.0357546,0.0000048782663,0.00008383641,0.09374054,0.85186243,0.00047346545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.110337295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037958454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8623162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043624645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044585127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4316169834","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv360npz6.12","title":"Why Alberta Needs a Constitution","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.029016213658975536,"score_gpt":0.23088124305923124,"score_spread":0.20186502940025572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4316169834","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000015777514,0.0000036011788,0.000034211393,0.0015647879,0.0007492459,0.000447716,0.0003141868,0.00031946547,0.9965652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0030171534,0.0005463745,0.000018092524,0.0004910065,0.00031059852,0.0000024197095,0.000034772514,0.000022226226,0.99555737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820536,0.00008201237,0.00021067282,0.00043355377,0.0006230862,0.0004453283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988157,0.00024375929,0.00020081438,0.0002473743,0.00027670764,0.00021563661],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001662833,0.00034911963,0.0004322258,0.00030252928,0.0025195226,0.0000497191,0.0004715783,0.00050251855,0.000101294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006877914,0.0004048551,0.00028183966,0.000051705196,0.0019539162,0.0001509961,0.00041510275,0.00039698003,0.00016720561],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004040771,0.000008650726,0.000004444009,0.0000140541,0.0002122726,0.00010530165,0.00050351274,0.0000045735815,6.4839105e-7,0.9779068,0.020743046,0.00045626744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026822946,0.000024744364,0.0000041780054,0.00017756724,0.0002260092,7.4641423e-7,0.00057181524,6.3975796e-7,0.0000057889397,0.016601792,0.9816715,0.00044699977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14326029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006896178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.961305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043966845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027245865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4316169838","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv360npz6.6","title":"Oui, Quebec Needs a Written Constitution","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03046103355323336,"score_gpt":0.23409428301732493,"score_spread":0.20363324946409156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4316169838","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000004458691,0.000005552896,0.000034894794,0.0009690298,0.0007369453,0.0004922582,0.00048324565,0.0005367244,0.9967369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0073844497,0.00052711164,0.000023034509,0.00018902803,0.00039128336,0.0000028955267,0.000041496514,0.00002351177,0.99141717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799395,0.00009946369,0.00024134594,0.00046394157,0.00071628875,0.00048502162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878806,0.00016833274,0.00022336595,0.0002600573,0.0003308818,0.00022930173],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023470516,0.00037663634,0.0004826394,0.0003447163,0.002612282,0.00006404426,0.00051434437,0.00061222137,0.00007654524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052555788,0.00043605382,0.00030809123,0.000055558347,0.0022146683,0.00017597577,0.00045315572,0.00050967647,0.0002052821],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044642205,0.000009935126,0.000006625109,0.000016549291,0.00022684851,0.00019411153,0.000521822,0.000004522407,0.000001057548,0.9900872,0.0072847884,0.0016019021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030206254,0.000022494321,0.000017139302,0.00019673069,0.00023706137,7.28052e-7,0.001160345,5.638212e-7,0.000006306638,0.014290051,0.9832791,0.0004874013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18978451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001510742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97599435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007691481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005158324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317368814","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192869678.001.0001","title":"Constitutional Public Reason","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Legitimacy; Ideal (ethics); Interpretation (philosophy); Politics; Public reason; Political science; Liberalism; Law and economics; Classical liberalism; Law; Sociology; Democracy; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05588037478176027,"score_gpt":0.2930715292216874,"score_spread":0.2371911544399271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317368814","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[9.537831e-7,0.0019865246,0.00006234215,0.006041833,0.0011351856,0.0001826981,0.000084046405,0.00015429313,0.9903521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0044505806,0.00083099253,0.00003889834,0.00063762313,0.0012887286,0.0000441158,0.0001362856,0.0000040939262,0.9925687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837196,0.00007399795,0.00016026101,0.0002448481,0.0008756424,0.00027329722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994279,0.00014085275,0.00008174765,0.00009184245,0.00014429002,0.00011336235],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039965886,0.00013327191,0.00019888341,0.000050869097,0.002560663,0.00006631147,0.00028817798,0.00014330601,0.041811593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021635788,0.00013194958,0.00013440271,0.00011355028,0.0039748214,0.000100855985,0.00016756747,0.000288681,0.0005708327],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020146226,0.000010931843,0.000031734733,0.0000010387155,0.00003397522,0.0000075231915,0.00010388635,1.9728175e-7,2.0514241e-8,0.6890928,0.3089454,0.0017704777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000431369,0.000006839568,0.000014152691,0.0000073419324,0.000014952624,0.0000015021758,0.00035006367,7.975839e-8,2.55352e-8,0.1962995,0.8031201,0.00014233029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012604706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031467604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4941747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081392494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005349607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317369040","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192869678.003.0008","title":"Standards of Scrutiny, Equal Protection, and Illicit Motives for Discrimination","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Suspect; Scrutiny; Doctrine; Legislature; Supreme court; Proposition; Prejudice (legal term); Law; Political science; Derogation; Law and economics; Legislative intent; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05959043897863676,"score_gpt":0.3179209930499774,"score_spread":0.25833055407134065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317369040","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000047064616,0.0006103544,0.0046300776,0.0011856959,0.00019488072,0.00070755166,0.0004385847,0.000028740029,0.99215704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5345206,0.0023182624,0.0002916905,0.00012476397,0.0007470281,0.00023335865,0.000048082915,0.00002538192,0.4616908],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905777,0.000018364353,0.00016498698,0.00016600595,0.0004914758,0.00010141685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938077,0.00007772337,0.00012388086,0.000038816837,0.00035037662,0.000028455801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043595542,0.00009472727,0.00018299247,0.00006138736,0.0008574233,0.000015704616,0.0000637623,0.00007627496,0.00078360643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001917961,0.00008525975,0.00006873165,0.000025140855,0.0006709583,0.00007444748,0.000063095256,0.00007620909,7.213854e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000219756,0.0000070617884,0.000007950259,0.000019873909,0.000040314753,1.543841e-7,0.0014870176,7.797988e-7,0.000005178721,0.9870035,0.00045042802,0.010955749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008931276,0.00008981035,0.000045040393,0.000028879977,0.00003609025,1.6089875e-7,0.0015240932,0.0000015408683,0.000010386298,0.37991443,0.6181644,0.000095809395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031160086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034733068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.617714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013318799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028136125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8579941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317369057","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192869678.003.0004","title":"Motive-based Judicial Review: Introduction","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Doctrine; Judicial review; Legislation; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Legislature; Law; Constitutional law; Interpretation (philosophy); Judicial opinion; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03298887896390611,"score_gpt":0.2850086040906974,"score_spread":0.25201972512679127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317369057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[2.9077128e-7,0.016002724,0.000039757426,0.037955813,0.001426033,0.0003681202,0.00002753727,0.0001082481,0.9440715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006308842,0.057348777,0.0000644993,0.006924128,0.009244983,0.000061145205,0.00011918053,0.00002301046,0.9255834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984938,0.000052606545,0.00023043653,0.0003133367,0.00072269456,0.00018712154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945426,0.00005951635,0.00013882671,0.00012267791,0.00016424537,0.000060468315],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004571698,0.00016498708,0.00031507574,0.00006812911,0.0013017578,0.000015635098,0.00018266616,0.00010111053,0.046895597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016172344,0.0001607868,0.00018797103,0.00006679699,0.00065441517,0.00006439874,0.00007214394,0.0002846789,0.0004185936],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000472971,0.0000075586677,0.0000032483133,0.000014930074,0.000026544414,0.0000034066193,0.00003932767,0.000001187706,1.8435472e-7,0.78880453,0.20699203,0.004102313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045006385,0.000023496332,0.0000080663485,0.00010632636,0.00007949742,3.0883672e-7,0.000041242976,1.5507497e-7,4.335639e-7,0.07029045,0.9292292,0.00017581914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034513348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022820092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72223717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003220292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005745888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317369069","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192869678.003.0005","title":"Problems with Motive-based Scrutiny—and Some Judicial Solutions","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Argument (complex analysis); Legislature; Political science; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Proportionality (law); Law; Law and economics; Judicial review; Sociology","score_opus":0.04965229276678795,"score_gpt":0.2508947139690968,"score_spread":0.20124242120230884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317369069","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002645617,0.0016938221,0.00012106899,0.0056208177,0.00023885319,0.0004658782,0.00007508158,0.00013026276,0.99162775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21165718,0.003102816,0.000369938,0.0032176701,0.0027622248,0.00024915804,0.00010855374,0.000077207806,0.77845526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984269,0.000033497345,0.00018135238,0.0003469142,0.000668032,0.00034330453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945587,0.00010434638,0.00011575744,0.000092648545,0.0001210532,0.00011029681],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028497807,0.00021465097,0.00028492103,0.00010184974,0.0031598564,0.00005060861,0.00015705715,0.0001310804,0.0028626828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029895862,0.0001813634,0.00008602148,0.00006150609,0.0020152542,0.00011986868,0.00013381151,0.00029838242,0.000058112462],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013321993,0.000018889918,0.00006734548,0.00000490588,0.00007249764,0.000007875098,0.00031650954,0.000019293399,6.185123e-7,0.9970389,0.0015196161,0.00092021364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018965764,0.00009085688,0.0001072712,0.000057260513,0.00008216714,9.000153e-7,0.00026274548,0.000002758035,3.1375356e-7,0.24677958,0.75215447,0.00027204707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011002307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017764155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75063485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019237895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009333707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317495515","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4326248","title":"Writing Canada's Political Constitution","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Politics; Political science; Law; Constitutionalism; Convention; Democracy; Sociology","score_opus":0.015944461855340895,"score_gpt":0.28582623033177645,"score_spread":0.2698817684764356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317495515","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28432226,0.0024728093,0.0012034328,0.087913536,0.0019513125,0.00021435547,0.000014585417,0.00026944955,0.62163824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969494,0.0011345461,0.0000041411736,0.00029405055,0.0009883115,0.0000025498473,0.000001897604,0.0000025779548,0.00062256854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968993,0.00007860348,0.00014965206,0.000093007,0.00043246368,0.002346971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995897,0.00009274145,0.00003920795,0.00003235476,0.000121416924,0.00012462366],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001373164,0.00006222858,0.00009024883,0.00004923762,0.0018378984,0.000042146898,0.00013171337,0.000037574835,0.00002493259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038134353,0.00005888539,0.000044668017,0.00031790283,0.00034870455,0.00009269927,0.000024568597,0.0005908148,0.000053126052],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030058377,0.000004381849,0.003928083,4.261731e-7,0.000028024098,0.0000108157665,0.00007815634,0.0000044539597,0.000006682112,0.99226016,0.0007329254,0.002942913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014565678,0.000019629739,0.0027111701,0.000013525872,0.000014296909,0.00005078878,0.029218111,0.0000060069783,0.0000043839564,0.8783683,0.08933455,0.000113590744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.70721304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96175474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71262705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021273848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021997811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317829597","doi":"10.1017/lsi.2022.89","title":"How Should Courts Respond to Political Questions? Exploring the Dialogical Turn in the Supreme Court of Canada’s Federalism and Indigenous Case Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Social Inquiry","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Federalism; Jurisprudence; Political science; Politics; Legitimacy; Indigenous; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.2075932223856702,"score_gpt":0.3600667689041165,"score_spread":0.15247354651844627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317829597","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8871044,0.00013524981,0.0000035008877,0.101756476,0.0005087343,0.0003006595,0.000042634794,0.000031761225,0.010116581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949991,0.00003720956,0.0000047210483,0.0037056825,0.0011051949,0.000074945536,0.0000026015653,0.000005160486,0.00006534893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981687,0.00041801584,0.00017289007,0.00016899333,0.000559227,0.00051218085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990643,0.00062482804,0.00003590982,0.000078343845,0.00009176996,0.0001048114],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010129173,0.00010438525,0.00018909795,0.000019161991,0.0032522005,0.00014654976,0.00019969414,0.00007699203,0.0000042836186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030209753,0.000069230264,0.000044974404,0.00030958318,0.0019447651,0.00012570909,0.00010639996,0.0002029468,0.0000015406949],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000147562005,0.000017613613,0.00033867641,0.0000026019143,0.000012222356,0.00027311538,0.08153462,0.0000017728313,0.0000100801135,0.9159063,0.0017288323,0.00015941758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034356548,0.00009349838,0.047688633,0.000045208424,0.000055985147,0.00005732392,0.4637481,0.0000021676326,0.00003793538,0.25643575,0.23108158,0.00041026328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8684419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9762647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65947056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000182166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004884527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99804544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318977071","doi":"10.3167/jla.2022.060205","title":"In support of free-standing Indigenous legal systems","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Anthropology","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Tsing Hua University","keywords":"Indigenous; Jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Economic Justice; Criminal jurisdiction; Work (physics); Public administration; Engineering","score_opus":0.026374138948550112,"score_gpt":0.33179440830931395,"score_spread":0.30542026936076383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318977071","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88989186,0.004960926,0.00025744745,0.02480838,0.010029608,0.00024381015,0.00008010253,0.000013524434,0.06971436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986914,0.00027736544,0.000022167316,0.00018992866,0.00047253622,0.0000030095648,4.375611e-7,0.0000033749432,0.00033981746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837583,0.00027386195,0.0005057111,0.000080118545,0.00050521165,0.00025924933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925566,0.00009851489,0.00040321643,0.00005642463,0.00013148061,0.000054694043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010850389,0.00006609672,0.00034226142,0.00021012775,0.00076141494,0.000015481315,0.00033028278,0.000043362874,0.00078774255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014869575,0.000059906157,0.00009352009,0.00031650526,0.0012143431,0.00023593278,0.00012084954,0.00031198535,0.000002255796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020752968,0.00033992267,0.018143645,0.00001224039,0.00011537326,0.001725246,0.016383411,0.00039948066,0.0003397649,0.9457068,0.016362546,0.0002640712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006998555,0.0009398721,0.0010543555,0.0000138401665,0.00003096327,0.0006226182,0.06240222,0.0000021292824,0.000067815796,0.0072752926,0.9267641,0.00012693657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05686079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055488176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9384315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031239536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009008609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9494197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319454612","doi":"10.1111/jols.12404","title":"<i>Lawyers in Conflict and Transition</i> By KieranMcEvoy, LouiseMallinder, and AnnaBryson, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022, 440 pp., £85.00","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Transition (genetics); Sociology; Media studies; Computer science; Chemistry","score_opus":0.01885001309155168,"score_gpt":0.2543587121059403,"score_spread":0.23550869901438862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319454612","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92011607,0.021587947,0.000097262666,0.016331902,0.00034311434,0.0002677729,0.00016948617,0.000041038733,0.041045394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9095241,0.08823864,0.000028902678,0.0010023933,0.00017521241,6.3975097e-7,0.0000032048724,0.0000045299084,0.0010223639],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990789,0.000092067334,0.0001889057,0.00014154297,0.00027974634,0.0002188171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995148,0.00009782531,0.000096454314,0.00003235645,0.000108939304,0.00014959878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055922614,0.00009793107,0.00023340952,0.000017568656,0.00076167565,0.00005803751,0.00007447298,0.0001031503,0.0000025272384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016505408,0.000093067945,0.00008712,0.00017028456,0.0011603127,0.00029421295,0.00003657234,0.00021517706,4.599482e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015990269,0.0001479996,0.005931887,0.00008025802,0.00031113284,0.00015593866,0.02599952,0.000015299125,0.0008791589,0.45442238,0.51120096,0.0006955455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017738238,0.00009416697,0.01202606,0.0000766619,0.00007133601,0.000020700054,0.021676382,0.00006336243,0.000040796418,0.00035359207,0.9635779,0.00022518155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00606642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003569449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45406878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004918001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000114219474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91706526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319586880","doi":"10.32920/22056788","title":"Twelve Angry (White) Men: The Constitutionality of the Statement of Principles","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Obligation; Sociology; Law; Statutory law; Denial; Law and economics; Racism; Opposition (politics); Statement (logic); Political science; Supreme court; Psychology","score_opus":0.14364767957028304,"score_gpt":0.36093277241238697,"score_spread":0.21728509284210393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319586880","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043724302,0.0008208695,0.00052140356,0.043840103,0.0022999058,0.0015083224,0.000570787,0.000091676746,0.90662265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960296,0.0004882926,0.00008448387,0.00012418779,0.00016994834,0.00005294711,0.0000071462227,0.0000031691648,0.0030402106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799377,0.0002625052,0.00048589258,0.00020872704,0.00086857716,0.00018055868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986543,0.0002813775,0.00038558658,0.00028717532,0.0003603502,0.00003121451],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015800698,0.0001226396,0.0002573251,0.000025155772,0.00070089917,0.000019705234,0.0006460615,0.00009920812,0.00019663983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042648087,0.00006394823,0.00022431447,0.00022230894,0.0042609316,0.000028560595,0.0011830932,0.00020597805,0.0000121358635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000655918,0.000043304262,0.035199396,0.000029067536,0.00015813742,3.5095994e-7,0.0025510387,0.0005780631,0.0000059389677,0.95722616,0.004114097,0.00008788513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024472995,0.000018954863,0.34000385,0.00039640022,0.00020672055,3.4970398e-7,0.029712344,0.00003322132,0.00038807146,0.43587396,0.19278495,0.00033645975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03509177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020998577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9523053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001176493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015781833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319844237","doi":"10.1177/0067205x221146335","title":"Active After Sunset<scp>:</scp> The Politics of Judicial Retirements in India","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Politics; Institution; Government (linguistics); Language change; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.039228230980859966,"score_gpt":0.3299607964961456,"score_spread":0.29073256551528565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319844237","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1633267,0.06090129,0.0000014854522,0.014761307,0.0009095316,0.001634299,0.0001342551,0.00009956094,0.7582316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9724835,0.023385426,0.0000048209513,0.003278736,0.00025916062,0.00011742432,0.000006477305,0.0000045000825,0.0004599554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871176,0.00020675545,0.0002525904,0.00013159266,0.00039044666,0.00030686648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994499,0.000252106,0.00008620483,0.000084498366,0.00008147125,0.00004581309],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005406194,0.00008730635,0.00024747345,0.000022549697,0.0005947878,0.000020922627,0.00017469589,0.000044383185,0.00005554433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050188886,0.00006206514,0.00009331292,0.00048291867,0.0005983331,0.00008592188,0.0000837045,0.00011177744,0.00013602336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025493612,0.0000246846,0.0056925337,0.00010268235,0.000025955738,0.00001065579,0.0015221243,1.363822e-7,0.0000012824969,0.98302215,0.008459617,0.001135619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011893576,0.000023548011,0.09062914,0.001387542,0.000034632987,4.010884e-7,0.000856962,2.7071755e-7,0.000015663247,0.06162366,0.8452478,0.000061453284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00996665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058590956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9213985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007002725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001538525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320494920","doi":"10.1177/09646639231155606","title":"Jurisdictional Relationships: Democracy and the Administrative State Through the Lens of <i>Caring Society v Canada</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Jurisdiction; Accountability; Democracy; State (computer science); Principle of legality; Political science; Public administration; Indigenous; Law; Rule of law; Sociology; Human rights; Citizenship","score_opus":0.10494261767499226,"score_gpt":0.35428728047102315,"score_spread":0.2493446627960309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320494920","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38024312,0.011492243,0.000046292393,0.44445145,0.0012387653,0.00096066593,0.00018905244,0.00017826921,0.16120012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99482703,0.0033798576,0.000012323634,0.00055317767,0.00044769945,0.000039786602,0.0000020642624,0.0000041372855,0.0007339206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855983,0.00027697405,0.0002289019,0.00014669469,0.0005327874,0.00025479868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812907,0.0014362482,0.00012806986,0.000047138255,0.00024334417,0.000016155416],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081618945,0.000105413106,0.00022373267,0.0000075527996,0.009983604,0.000036881585,0.00013426134,0.000036324687,0.0000036396045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004340418,0.00006351035,0.000114855815,0.0004621718,0.0043735905,0.00017435862,0.00014384935,0.00023675252,0.0000027497435],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022548507,0.0000064949545,0.002633921,0.0000051427824,0.00039156276,0.000001148677,0.11482283,0.000012151338,0.0000015364636,0.8550467,0.026760824,0.0002951477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004889939,0.000015533093,0.07197203,0.000027101485,0.00012880891,5.6216624e-7,0.30838257,0.000005948332,0.000008376442,0.43318832,0.18561873,0.00016301997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43750542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75032717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6145839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013531701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008474166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99833596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320723750","doi":"10.1177/08883254221144721","title":"Idiotic or Columbo’s Wife? Constitutional Conventions in the Czech Republic","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"East European Politics and Societies and Cultures","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Grantová Agentura České Republiky","keywords":"Law; Ratification; Political science; Democracy; Cabinet (room); Politics; Constitution; Constitutional court; Czech; Presidential system; Constitutional amendment; Constitutionality; Sociology","score_opus":0.047395438763517116,"score_gpt":0.30595760585394755,"score_spread":0.25856216709043045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320723750","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3083919,0.0031729161,0.000022614575,0.040488616,0.00047000535,0.0003926167,0.00016270814,0.0001548088,0.64674383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891528,0.0015575683,0.000011142196,0.0013927708,0.00030343258,0.0000071847194,0.000011921478,0.0000029799694,0.0075601847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990533,0.000193851,0.00013271069,0.00013639251,0.00022820446,0.00025553314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997072,0.00007734471,0.000030423935,0.000050575247,0.00006744156,0.000066967186],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005781593,0.00007678944,0.00009694299,0.00002288058,0.0019481215,0.00021600896,0.00010713847,0.00003271597,0.000046530648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017634318,0.000050489456,0.00004386117,0.00022059238,0.0027702355,0.00007302058,0.000068448055,0.00010876006,0.000024461464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001619693,0.000016006552,0.0021710643,0.000006470485,0.000015322044,0.000012658079,0.01337832,0.0000013339891,0.000001757325,0.94460034,0.03968167,0.00011341363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026362375,0.00002855781,0.09350654,0.000039318773,0.000021443195,0.000012970034,0.1449794,0.000008973998,2.9649493e-7,0.05418898,0.7068074,0.00014249052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005817059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00066642655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8904114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001761702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011200955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321327780","doi":"10.1002/cjs.11766","title":"Acknowledgement of Referees' Services Remerciements aux membres des jurys","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Acknowledgement; Citation; Library science; World Wide Web; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.08166070235918853,"score_gpt":0.3178645075106965,"score_spread":0.23620380515150796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321327780","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63673645,0.10187424,0.0032142298,0.023452567,0.031253085,0.0007648255,0.009803479,0.000043027318,0.19285811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822579,0.00841689,0.0021798275,0.00021331439,0.00087091856,0.000001938732,0.000016765252,0.000014026651,0.006028412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982641,0.00011787855,0.0005736655,0.00010791741,0.00045598953,0.00048049184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99740356,0.00015113947,0.00036066608,0.000077789664,0.0014524829,0.00055435556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067262235,0.00013296572,0.00030930655,0.00023244531,0.0007876303,0.0000493373,0.0003523056,0.00007874926,0.00089240354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034574172,0.00013643884,0.00007909809,0.0007445916,0.0017867517,0.0001791435,0.00003669745,0.00015641729,0.00018471059],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001800003,0.00004960171,0.022863813,0.00034536608,0.00046305067,0.0003223339,0.016157538,0.0001332328,0.000024311472,0.77226096,0.12659387,0.060767885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035024257,0.00024266803,0.06864169,0.0009067489,0.00029761443,0.00000818679,0.015266233,0.000044073302,0.000032419586,0.23638847,0.67759,0.00023164097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11924456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6540424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5509961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003530506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035455974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9771193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321368849","doi":"10.24144/2788-6018.2022.06.9","title":"Dialogical theory of constitutional jurisdiction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Constitution; Political science; Constitutional theory; Constitutional law; Sociology","score_opus":0.12130931269363114,"score_gpt":0.371503140657479,"score_spread":0.25019382796384787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321368849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63577485,0.0007505529,0.005086404,0.002907199,0.00033134487,0.00019825155,0.000029066812,0.00014501075,0.3547773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989553,0.00041321758,0.000027320786,0.000072763076,0.00013392641,0.000008770533,0.0000030408564,6.8368786e-7,0.00038497912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989247,0.00024207089,0.00016810861,0.00016404048,0.0003214598,0.00017964028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998622,0.0010750083,0.000042084135,0.00004528497,0.00012559106,0.00009005225],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000691212,0.00007234452,0.00019485496,0.00005883266,0.00075310434,0.000017888806,0.00009310379,0.000047930807,0.00012749397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003320609,0.000057574893,0.000053695334,0.0004764908,0.0050646267,0.00010233654,0.000058468857,0.0001254532,0.00010918363],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002828791,0.000032129177,0.005881986,0.000001913259,0.000029988661,0.0000051804814,0.0013233216,0.000015531887,0.000023012472,0.99120003,0.0008459759,0.0006126657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033365857,0.00013891235,0.22118784,0.00006435925,0.000086484215,0.000003917903,0.009743896,0.00071003905,0.00010647342,0.69721365,0.07012177,0.00028896928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017438375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007785161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36318046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000175603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012657582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323244414","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4373693","title":"The Global Expansion of Judicial Power","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.012980106029116811,"score_gpt":0.296166475846758,"score_spread":0.28318636981764117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323244414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79602545,0.008436344,0.00057744316,0.022115275,0.0022126108,0.00020585307,0.000009055087,0.00011444727,0.17030352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988022,0.01113279,0.0000021732083,0.00004478695,0.00039714898,0.000001915583,3.426398e-7,0.0000022613492,0.0003965546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980176,0.000095587304,0.00016043922,0.00007151381,0.00045621675,0.0011986375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996201,0.00008396,0.000083941406,0.00004781423,0.000121271856,0.000042939017],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00202975,0.000054269163,0.000087550034,0.000022711245,0.0018604081,0.000028544015,0.00023347029,0.000038452414,0.000013351911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026290872,0.000036580026,0.0000882444,0.00048640542,0.00045477954,0.00007260563,0.00004098952,0.00033553276,0.00006186214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020791222,0.0000063209236,0.002703803,1.5788945e-7,0.00004334105,0.0000011961014,0.0003888072,0.00000333406,0.00001286781,0.9847418,0.00052339316,0.011554181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011448883,0.000062146086,0.005228273,0.00000682674,0.000010173292,0.000007007882,0.016657371,0.0000011112834,0.000005089331,0.9385136,0.039344594,0.000049332495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020468843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018318629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19199657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047995333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032967597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324141003","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12648","title":"Activists in international courts: Backlash, funding, and strategy in international legal mobilization","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Mobilization; Backlash; Political science; Law; Public administration; Engineering","score_opus":0.05077825185227353,"score_gpt":0.36779101046751156,"score_spread":0.31701275861523803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324141003","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15098453,0.13594417,0.000054258973,0.080131985,0.0029950063,0.0020271575,0.00007902108,0.00035751125,0.6274263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62670356,0.37151992,0.000023787345,0.001029101,0.00016350171,0.000044193846,0.000029616354,0.0000038457188,0.00048249436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899256,0.000068397836,0.00022811005,0.00019530539,0.00033035164,0.00018530079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969864,0.000081711034,0.000065405846,0.000044553886,0.00007129315,0.00003841168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072684773,0.00008194369,0.00016632435,0.0000064094966,0.00018040057,0.00006604339,0.00015847132,0.00005126694,0.00015465725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010714918,0.00008016047,0.000072665476,0.00037310773,0.00029960257,0.00032518778,0.00007858418,0.00011652916,0.00003611011],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048098113,0.00007051428,0.0173179,0.00011918612,0.000049896695,0.00000932254,0.00164853,0.000041351304,0.000019693438,0.96073884,0.008797472,0.011182511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036020536,0.000012418967,0.030404579,0.0014132624,0.0000143794805,0.000001869297,0.003330384,0.00026697453,0.0000022165389,0.01529542,0.94869465,0.00020367249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002847931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071337996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9454434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019474696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000105765066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4305239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324141090","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12642","title":"Foreign agents or agents of justice? Private foundations, backlash against non-governmental organizations, and international human rights litigation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Pomona College","keywords":"Human rights; Premise; Political science; Law; Foundation (evidence); Economic Justice; International human rights law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.05267449039984401,"score_gpt":0.3565828156326064,"score_spread":0.3039083252327624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324141090","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35368642,0.029237237,0.00035631086,0.016892945,0.0029207761,0.0054263216,0.0007004515,0.00063513295,0.5901444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74097294,0.2529954,0.0004928891,0.0026898158,0.00038450057,0.00006241415,0.00043940303,0.000013713741,0.0019489573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878645,0.000058632235,0.00032582754,0.00019151007,0.00046958763,0.00016797204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994192,0.00006592107,0.00017684166,0.00008592122,0.00018807875,0.000063997846],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003829218,0.0001050987,0.000200478,0.0000034667514,0.0014970371,0.00004800485,0.0001823074,0.000051446536,0.0003499117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010342055,0.000089642395,0.00009498424,0.0005522942,0.00047539917,0.00025645146,0.00012769314,0.00006199171,0.000078181845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021639823,0.00006720475,0.0038363552,0.00045584733,0.00016837545,0.0000017277708,0.0010180398,0.0000018656023,0.00005955231,0.9496882,0.04368275,0.0010179277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005278258,0.00003114386,0.010898691,0.0021160604,0.00032571133,0.0000010896927,0.0026180025,0.00008301318,0.000050354294,0.03306671,0.9499727,0.0003087014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037910102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00053499476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9166215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019364253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007157998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360619863","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192855480.003.0001","title":"European Constitutional Imaginaries","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.057941121754552745,"score_gpt":0.28735572829893397,"score_spread":0.22941460654438123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360619863","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[4.2325036e-7,0.0003938343,0.00014997617,0.004444392,0.00097576244,0.00011570824,0.000059291004,0.0003702356,0.9934904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0062824865,0.0010451883,0.00005005925,0.000458563,0.0013418433,0.0000029834023,0.000029327653,0.000012773625,0.9907768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998905,0.000027266537,0.00016680657,0.00022375096,0.00047064698,0.00020655332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949473,0.000106720014,0.00006277427,0.0000819081,0.00017172129,0.00008215879],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003313118,0.00015361754,0.00017828798,0.00006843374,0.001236615,0.000069445676,0.00018996233,0.00008603688,0.0021576576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010538703,0.00014285182,0.00011847149,0.000034489967,0.0073218276,0.000072832016,0.00012345787,0.00017053218,0.009863775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018669572,0.0000026474424,0.000026208667,0.0000016026942,0.00004833224,0.00005186192,0.00018815168,4.0007234e-7,3.103181e-7,0.9574587,0.040733665,0.0014862998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027314292,0.0000032625646,0.00005681555,0.000029492892,0.000016354043,8.116763e-7,0.000109174645,4.2954216e-8,1.1064733e-7,0.38211873,0.61751705,0.000120848235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008669521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016379737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57678336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000079095094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053029327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361741323","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4391710","title":"The Old Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Commonwealth; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.032951960051522136,"score_gpt":0.3096275215853399,"score_spread":0.2766755615338178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361741323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45472664,0.015914029,0.010069573,0.12449331,0.0024463867,0.0006871808,0.00005306276,0.0003237937,0.39128602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9724965,0.02437349,0.000008653721,0.000111172434,0.0002487176,0.0000041587828,9.908365e-7,0.0000027180688,0.0027535977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980393,0.0000920892,0.00019211434,0.000070470924,0.00043323962,0.001172776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994568,0.00017638165,0.00010536177,0.000058353482,0.0001513302,0.00005172196],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029542749,0.000057378773,0.00009952057,0.000042410076,0.002720392,0.00002828029,0.00026821144,0.000036512363,0.000005217424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021259484,0.0000397774,0.00008136821,0.0003119851,0.0010204476,0.00008322856,0.00003738825,0.0005156666,0.000033746903],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000097034745,0.000008800855,0.00080933253,4.7019768e-7,0.000048448554,4.252508e-7,0.00049163227,0.00037060582,0.0000129810005,0.994878,0.00092313567,0.0024464428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001231921,0.000020248015,0.00028458072,0.000007738986,0.0000108592285,0.0000058889427,0.0067807166,0.00019612415,0.0000028876561,0.97230166,0.020215077,0.000051008334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022123521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018248439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5177699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000367682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005874709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366431488","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4414433","title":"Making Constitutional Judges Accountable for Deliberating","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Constitutional law; Law; Law and economics; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.05591310676735337,"score_gpt":0.35368655113945346,"score_spread":0.29777344437210007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366431488","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24771042,0.01813926,0.14003178,0.061991036,0.0059869424,0.0018103418,0.00008920707,0.0012101788,0.5230308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99466515,0.0019605472,0.00013244107,0.00028662276,0.0014603303,0.000024381088,0.0000052559003,0.000005399351,0.0014598614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975699,0.000047381913,0.0001798923,0.00013189111,0.0003355835,0.0017353448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994624,0.00017539169,0.000081525446,0.000037055164,0.00019969842,0.00004391952],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023857853,0.000082913764,0.00011698517,0.00008309208,0.0034078644,0.000114709575,0.00017682622,0.00005320161,0.00004095132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004320423,0.00007724881,0.00009605959,0.00033276752,0.0005228755,0.00025745798,0.000032942076,0.00042426007,0.00007766985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001053265,0.000008423362,0.0025734003,0.0000012054842,0.00006210688,0.0000012487594,0.0003501046,0.00008168504,0.000026839756,0.98941016,0.0013147142,0.006159582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024563752,0.000032080177,0.0003216218,0.000018233832,0.000020067533,0.000019703275,0.012258227,0.00004068189,0.0000045413767,0.86927724,0.11764409,0.000117868534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024028595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057491832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74695474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007497979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048678094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366521663","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4414387","title":"The Old Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Commonwealth; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.032951960051522136,"score_gpt":0.3096275215853399,"score_spread":0.2766755615338178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366521663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45472664,0.015914029,0.010069573,0.12449331,0.0024463867,0.0006871808,0.00005306276,0.0003237937,0.39128602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9724965,0.02437349,0.000008653721,0.000111172434,0.0002487176,0.0000041587828,9.908365e-7,0.0000027180688,0.0027535977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980393,0.0000920892,0.00019211434,0.000070470924,0.00043323962,0.001172776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994568,0.00017638165,0.00010536177,0.000058353482,0.0001513302,0.00005172196],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029542749,0.000057378773,0.00009952057,0.000042410076,0.002720392,0.00002828029,0.00026821144,0.000036512363,0.000005217424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021259484,0.0000397774,0.00008136821,0.0003119851,0.0010204476,0.00008322856,0.00003738825,0.0005156666,0.000033746903],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000097034745,0.000008800855,0.00080933253,4.7019768e-7,0.000048448554,4.252508e-7,0.00049163227,0.00037060582,0.0000129810005,0.994878,0.00092313567,0.0024464428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001231921,0.000020248015,0.00028458072,0.000007738986,0.0000108592285,0.0000058889427,0.0067807166,0.00019612415,0.0000028876561,0.97230166,0.020215077,0.000051008334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022123521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018248439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5177699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000367682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005874709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366957416","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4416662","title":"Constructing the Demos: Voter Qualification Laws in Comparative Context","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.060597607256213326,"score_gpt":0.35122751707053945,"score_spread":0.2906299098143261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366957416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90227157,0.0025127118,0.00081304234,0.044757754,0.00054243533,0.00027686634,0.000003551693,0.00007310964,0.048748948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975785,0.0014507741,0.000004934917,0.00017093372,0.00030923553,0.00000812664,0.0000013769916,0.0000024211354,0.00047369394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824923,0.00026914472,0.00019035499,0.00009350706,0.00025271068,0.0009450394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995157,0.0002325821,0.00009729858,0.000041927502,0.00008429104,0.000028205384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026283192,0.0000615869,0.0001136314,0.000054611348,0.0011110905,0.000052505733,0.0001811533,0.000035005876,0.000016383177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000164522,0.000043692922,0.000047234844,0.0004633464,0.00045360424,0.00012403527,0.000021442613,0.00066340895,0.000101093436],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008734682,0.0000068412246,0.009576929,2.4702757e-7,0.000030489777,8.527995e-7,0.0064492836,0.0000072454086,0.000008722452,0.9673006,0.00021281002,0.01639728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018019168,0.000017956772,0.003231316,0.000012518935,0.0000072957077,0.000011552718,0.40014204,0.00002281879,0.000007898006,0.5854368,0.010860119,0.00006947306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039214864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20854725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39369276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006239191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013395593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85457224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366987674","doi":"10.29173/psur352","title":"Unwritten Constitutional Principles: Ensuring Consistency and Evolution in Canadian Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Undergraduate Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Legislature; Law; Political science; Constitutional review; Supreme court; Action (physics); Constitution; Computer science","score_opus":0.06360794219368804,"score_gpt":0.3409809694621175,"score_spread":0.27737302726842944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366987674","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009139254,0.013353213,0.000033487104,0.13709688,0.00031906678,0.00062662055,0.000027572336,0.00012954188,0.83927435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875182,0.010467586,0.00003712045,0.0018126091,0.000070559065,0.000025363253,0.000002647558,0.0000020748187,0.00006382171],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739105,0.00011325234,0.00027717953,0.00032331332,0.00057639903,0.001318781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869925,0.00018278742,0.000032469467,0.00009313944,0.00015305588,0.0008393251],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002411979,0.00010308438,0.00021639153,0.0001774945,0.0017643049,0.00007172981,0.0002104262,0.000040810948,0.000018492197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019167969,0.00009330385,0.000042721884,0.0016324167,0.011533298,0.00028205806,0.00009321301,0.000118462565,0.00015885865],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.9797926e-7,0.000006835967,0.01815024,0.000045081208,0.000002444242,0.000012653365,0.00004268435,0.0000011087088,0.000002905396,0.98141587,0.000036774643,0.00028311127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013396586,0.000013185408,0.09109916,0.0017705567,0.00002582497,0.000016205404,0.0006475224,0.000059471542,0.000002499851,0.79163367,0.114307344,0.0002905912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6724449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6278653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97837895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011528269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003991021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99953526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4372080422","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v33i3-4.5810","title":"Protecting Rights in Common Law Constitutional Systems; a Framework for a Comparative Study","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Law; Parliamentary sovereignty; Political science; Common law; Constitution; Bill of rights; Constitutional law; Legislature; Human rights; Constitutional review; Fundamental rights; Comparative law; Politics; Democracy; Sovereignty","score_opus":0.0721219157603624,"score_gpt":0.314255935206012,"score_spread":0.2421340194456496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4372080422","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06313842,0.10477647,0.012332655,0.0041869185,0.00388686,0.02204264,0.00020661567,0.00034979286,0.7890796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978145,0.001544569,0.00039780833,0.000053246466,0.00013307214,0.00000771417,0.0000019780705,0.0000014244761,0.00004573196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987438,0.00034041947,0.00024217388,0.00020015611,0.00028952077,0.00018397893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990357,0.00043238298,0.00018664532,0.00009177137,0.00019666554,0.00005682091],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069117313,0.00010534861,0.00049342454,0.000030676834,0.0014440494,0.000015770136,0.00020848287,0.00006764848,0.00008297005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037007663,0.000106945976,0.00009601277,0.00030857185,0.0012259241,0.00013599484,0.000033485438,0.00016645477,0.000024554689],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015563131,0.00019867961,0.00035739725,0.00015956088,0.000046704834,0.0000046366645,0.0037019434,0.000023075312,4.998919e-7,0.99536204,0.00010668387,0.000023195504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046356054,0.0001060839,0.000022367183,0.0032766382,0.00010471291,6.2375153e-7,0.0036999357,0.000036968235,0.0000022232873,0.035974577,0.95613295,0.00017938478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038258933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028815808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9593875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013786444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004789405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376128962","doi":"10.1093/psquar/qqad008","title":"Taking Ideas Seriously in Political Science: The Diffusion of Presidentialism in Latin America after Independence","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Positive economics; Independence (probability theory); Political science; Epistemology; Disadvantaged; Discipline; Salient; Foundation (evidence); Construct (python library); Democracy; Generalization; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.02035971232431383,"score_gpt":0.33475976068230956,"score_spread":0.31440004835799573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376128962","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9666596,0.00002416387,0.00003099103,0.009666716,0.0002876087,0.00024453123,0.0000069437906,0.000041777064,0.023037672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992747,0.0000042423244,0.000036862486,0.0004604858,0.0001389971,0.000042378382,3.2966523e-7,0.0000037477323,0.000038299644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947796,0.00016598396,0.00041623766,0.00045314402,0.0020235376,0.0021615261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987116,0.00037293427,0.00008211009,0.00020006164,0.00020396303,0.00042933386],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030435016,0.00012448624,0.000216736,0.00043826984,0.0009031109,0.00018403184,0.00092522346,0.000067911635,0.000081471066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019143316,0.00009260631,0.00005541375,0.004620259,0.014439884,0.00061652163,0.0001536074,0.00025658673,0.00006947969],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009797441,0.000043119915,0.063490316,0.0000033146976,9.148024e-7,0.000019025501,0.010442928,0.0000024558292,0.00066454365,0.92346907,0.000004122547,0.0018504082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104936,0.000060160073,0.7777052,0.000051283198,0.0000032250337,0.0000011212338,0.02221926,0.00020574893,0.000053946842,0.19943571,0.0000507914,0.00010864295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18445136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01941557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72403336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048742013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001990226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376280060","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2023.8","title":"Public Law’s Cerberus: A Three-Headed Approach to <i>Charter</i> Rights-Limiting Administrative Decisions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Charter; Limiting; Guard (computer science); Jurisprudence; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.17849941339155584,"score_gpt":0.3406026480060538,"score_spread":0.16210323461449794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376280060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.072158284,0.000984896,0.0017952033,0.032680634,0.0015682314,0.0005073867,0.00011929685,0.00008025776,0.8901058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996858,0.000037834336,0.00056620874,0.0016319609,0.0006964646,0.000015116101,0.0000023109988,0.000008907554,0.00018320026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769485,0.00013973507,0.00046568416,0.00024482075,0.0006969353,0.0007580042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972239,0.000360255,0.00019026204,0.0001461789,0.00059550663,0.0014838701],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010918397,0.00016359407,0.00030847342,0.0002035688,0.0029734871,0.00033108887,0.0007251572,0.00010428325,0.00007431428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006172939,0.00014526538,0.0001577818,0.0010014229,0.0011941211,0.0005222449,0.000042836684,0.00031985927,0.00017413728],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068076547,0.000018400051,0.00059238035,0.0000018277341,0.000041501098,0.00020329683,0.0053840745,0.000020262838,0.000020564361,0.9880835,0.005025765,0.000601644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032777083,0.00017526833,0.004159755,0.0003142645,0.000054548338,0.000092164584,0.00644978,0.000016127782,0.00008208743,0.17878577,0.8090857,0.00045674344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1183125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7881506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9246997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030869883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030386955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376866467","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2023.7","title":"Rights Talk and Constitutional Emotivism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Conflation; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Epistemology; Constitutional law; Law; Sociology; Sentence; Political science; Philosophy; Law and economics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.029012186724913906,"score_gpt":0.29176429331943665,"score_spread":0.26275210659452275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376866467","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5585986,0.005069352,0.0005568263,0.019396996,0.0032801847,0.00023065042,0.00007466036,0.000057796147,0.41273493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987239,0.0001679186,0.000058006444,0.00032540158,0.00043702195,0.0000010407704,6.693028e-7,0.0000018678132,0.0002841299],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990592,0.00005613954,0.00018867839,0.000094365874,0.0003053067,0.0002962879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990182,0.00011705458,0.00008627798,0.000042790947,0.00022330234,0.0005123704],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005028344,0.00007098793,0.00013918114,0.00011417862,0.0015829265,0.00008393774,0.00018415268,0.000053653443,0.00011967286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016006514,0.000063382606,0.000051530336,0.00027246354,0.0064996965,0.00026970278,0.000014354721,0.00013713966,0.000055655088],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021085766,0.000002550275,0.0020426468,0.0000014953109,0.000018276814,0.00044415361,0.0010223979,0.000009833463,0.000008528166,0.9937984,0.0023141764,0.00033546978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014260784,0.000028402996,0.009426895,0.00009821431,0.000018247514,0.000104536346,0.00051887316,0.0000023273194,0.000017669257,0.19734307,0.7921809,0.00011823755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06937158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25996962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7964553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010776788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018895057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997169},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377138232","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12649","title":"Relational legal consciousness in the one-child nation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Legal consciousness; Consciousness; Population; Social psychology; China; Sociology; Relational theory; Law; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.08590189137597894,"score_gpt":0.32889242320289863,"score_spread":0.2429905318269197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377138232","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014658647,0.17757146,0.000010060327,0.23398596,0.00040617425,0.00085776293,0.000015321903,0.00014721669,0.5855402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.388136,0.5859713,0.00006577511,0.024573851,0.0005720021,0.00013617284,0.000037132755,0.0000051405113,0.0005026068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989384,0.00016377769,0.00016632913,0.00011724658,0.0004515622,0.00016267321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995867,0.00021183261,0.00004780359,0.0000647106,0.00006899272,0.000019972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014712978,0.00005620443,0.00013085864,0.0000012243677,0.001109292,0.000029281346,0.00015120096,0.000041833835,0.00006918054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013858973,0.000041778432,0.00013971885,0.00070639915,0.0004697913,0.00013737327,0.000029563176,0.0001352541,0.00021067707],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.3073707e-7,0.000014116475,0.00049267936,0.00004289479,0.000010799593,8.0354766e-7,0.0010378344,0.0000015416891,3.2985156e-7,0.9796088,0.018056998,0.00073287723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000618086,0.0000029811763,0.0045408756,0.00047631812,0.000020086713,6.8079726e-7,0.001037959,0.000002715706,1.5026946e-7,0.027854795,0.9659364,0.00006518344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019471295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053709093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.951754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005613586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010639494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.853189},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377230595","doi":"10.1515/9780228014775-004","title":"Oui, Quebec Needs a Written Constitution","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; History; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03046103355323336,"score_gpt":0.23409428301732493,"score_spread":0.20363324946409156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377230595","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000004458691,0.000005552896,0.000034894794,0.0009690298,0.0007369453,0.0004922582,0.00048324565,0.0005367244,0.9967369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0073844497,0.00052711164,0.000023034509,0.00018902803,0.00039128336,0.0000028955267,0.000041496514,0.00002351177,0.99141717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799395,0.00009946369,0.00024134594,0.00046394157,0.00071628875,0.00048502162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878806,0.00016833274,0.00022336595,0.0002600573,0.0003308818,0.00022930173],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023470516,0.00037663634,0.0004826394,0.0003447163,0.002612282,0.00006404426,0.00051434437,0.00061222137,0.00007654524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052555788,0.00043605382,0.00030809123,0.000055558347,0.0022146683,0.00017597577,0.00045315572,0.00050967647,0.0002052821],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044642205,0.000009935126,0.000006625109,0.000016549291,0.00022684851,0.00019411153,0.000521822,0.000004522407,0.000001057548,0.9900872,0.0072847884,0.0016019021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030206254,0.000022494321,0.000017139302,0.00019673069,0.00023706137,7.28052e-7,0.001160345,5.638212e-7,0.000006306638,0.014290051,0.9832791,0.0004874013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18978451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001510742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97599435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007691481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005158324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377237480","doi":"10.1515/9780773555594","title":"Canada and the Ethics of Constitutionalism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Political science; Law; Democracy","score_opus":0.02439366407720996,"score_gpt":0.2377551708006889,"score_spread":0.21336150672347892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377237480","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000005102365,0.000014399781,0.000013694473,0.0024555058,0.000342581,0.00029598895,0.00072925625,0.000024645875,0.99611884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011735933,0.00061953376,0.000026714652,0.0006205937,0.00025160264,0.0000012520452,0.000013079858,0.0000066087177,0.9867247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837303,0.00033326773,0.00016056436,0.00023963834,0.00067862525,0.00021489062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982372,0.00080263335,0.00021625668,0.00015473923,0.0004938307,0.00009534477],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004902375,0.00017353856,0.0003375906,0.000043761225,0.0023652173,0.000015674581,0.00037235857,0.00030174988,0.000019017476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020287545,0.00014761926,0.00009312814,0.000022454922,0.008679143,0.00004642265,0.00031399657,0.00045111444,0.0000011365343],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005706452,0.0000032988605,0.0000042030474,0.000019475834,0.00014490524,0.000018481467,0.00057209673,8.914197e-7,6.880324e-8,0.963211,0.03590905,0.000059465303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041891073,0.000008180026,0.000013480328,0.00010604342,0.00015917247,5.7856187e-7,0.00038390822,3.188704e-7,0.0000048654815,0.019808399,0.97893095,0.00016517792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96477973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18124123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9434026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042541663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046986127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99893355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377239417","doi":"10.1515/9780773569195-007","title":"The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: The Political Battle over Four Words","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Battle; Charter; Politics; Political science; Law; History; Ancient history","score_opus":0.02080638281531536,"score_gpt":0.2220930866857527,"score_spread":0.20128670387043734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377239417","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000031227097,0.00001193513,0.0000024450992,0.0027184335,0.00027024635,0.00025386727,0.0002588165,0.00002260351,0.9964304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21277002,0.00018678901,0.000005210866,0.00026922746,0.00034479014,0.00000140179,0.0000036701754,0.000011296669,0.7864076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986903,0.00008128962,0.0001364642,0.00023512432,0.0004188622,0.00043797516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989616,0.00031876616,0.00010058594,0.00020467913,0.00016592299,0.0002483982],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016069124,0.00019189427,0.00023112385,0.00007155863,0.0039474443,0.000046178684,0.0004059995,0.0002453852,0.000059638252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026778202,0.00013289972,0.000122053854,0.000015571573,0.0033272193,0.0000567935,0.00017897533,0.00029862695,0.0000059696035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001566474,0.000002589616,0.000022725142,0.0000026114308,0.00011530504,0.00003750685,0.00030712015,1.4773264e-7,8.566012e-8,0.9966423,0.0026047404,0.00024922946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013711091,0.000014725142,0.00013422187,0.00004577091,0.00010127118,9.2784177e-7,0.00039368458,5.3165905e-7,0.0000019657398,0.07234427,0.92666686,0.00015865114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8153298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1854958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.924298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032955632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024978674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377239704","doi":"10.1515/9780773554337-008","title":"The Conditional Nature of Trust in Canada’s Multinational Constitutional Politics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multinational corporation; Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.014263710753857893,"score_gpt":0.22620991930219883,"score_spread":0.21194620854834093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377239704","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000039324656,0.0000137179895,0.000010263735,0.00090046675,0.00041183017,0.0002602743,0.0029307078,0.000017994384,0.99541545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26570094,0.00024868138,0.000053836888,0.00028523087,0.00040611927,0.0000021725236,0.00012780503,0.000010378727,0.73316485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982357,0.00007339614,0.00024661992,0.00026652924,0.0008726632,0.00030508926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847096,0.00040729038,0.00024191124,0.0001281044,0.0006431605,0.00010854505],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001739247,0.00020414831,0.00026250377,0.00009626738,0.0019170219,0.000014815336,0.00041508072,0.00031556826,0.0001354833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001010324,0.00019755663,0.00011363939,0.00001959672,0.00469892,0.00006812698,0.00018891584,0.00047910062,0.0000041444905],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029553386,0.000008695265,0.000061362145,0.0000068495306,0.00010654488,0.000037350987,0.000099711695,0.000010118391,1.607935e-7,0.9936857,0.0058766906,0.000077256984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029358818,0.000009715492,0.000355773,0.00007481995,0.000044984998,8.956417e-7,0.00058238546,0.000002651955,0.000008678671,0.048716146,0.9497076,0.00020275277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.69311136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16225077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94496953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001552972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004522202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377239826","doi":"10.1515/9780773554337-009","title":"The Construction of Canada in Historical Perspective: Distrust as an Inherent Component of Constitutional Debates?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distrust; Perspective (graphical); Component (thermodynamics); Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Positive economics; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Economics; Computer science; Physics; Quantum mechanics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.019726292055597422,"score_gpt":0.23046574832249203,"score_spread":0.2107394562668946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377239826","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000326237,0.000015916034,0.000015751024,0.00041857263,0.0004883869,0.00028521885,0.00030887767,0.000016846465,0.9981242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59648234,0.00053915405,0.000093772076,0.00004432655,0.00027865835,0.0000032775936,0.000025779575,0.000015132293,0.40251756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851584,0.00010832036,0.00026348175,0.00027377476,0.00061754556,0.00022100686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868107,0.00014966769,0.0003257114,0.00015248751,0.0005768873,0.000114165814],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016041011,0.00018295774,0.00033798476,0.000076289754,0.0011554898,0.000008600094,0.0003203581,0.00017114292,0.000057920697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000564444,0.00017265185,0.00009974372,0.00002332697,0.004731157,0.000062819905,0.0001544794,0.00022717059,7.678172e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013357562,0.00002185209,0.000054098615,0.0000090050835,0.00009605467,0.000022477168,0.00035316125,0.0000059143927,0.0000013791511,0.998302,0.00084577774,0.0001547086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002736338,0.000054129498,0.00011667882,0.00010321466,0.000062446976,0.0000015064929,0.0025560465,0.000001065521,0.0000344557,0.025785578,0.97081405,0.00019721646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8361918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.097146496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9725164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033951954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014757509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377247848","doi":"10.1515/9780228014775-010","title":"Why Alberta Needs a Constitution","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.029016213658975536,"score_gpt":0.23088124305923124,"score_spread":0.20186502940025572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377247848","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000015777514,0.0000036011788,0.000034211393,0.0015647879,0.0007492459,0.000447716,0.0003141868,0.00031946547,0.9965652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0030171534,0.0005463745,0.000018092524,0.0004910065,0.00031059852,0.0000024197095,0.000034772514,0.000022226226,0.99555737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820536,0.00008201237,0.00021067282,0.00043355377,0.0006230862,0.0004453283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988157,0.00024375929,0.00020081438,0.0002473743,0.00027670764,0.00021563661],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001662833,0.00034911963,0.0004322258,0.00030252928,0.0025195226,0.0000497191,0.0004715783,0.00050251855,0.000101294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006877914,0.0004048551,0.00028183966,0.000051705196,0.0019539162,0.0001509961,0.00041510275,0.00039698003,0.00016720561],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004040771,0.000008650726,0.000004444009,0.0000140541,0.0002122726,0.00010530165,0.00050351274,0.0000045735815,6.4839105e-7,0.9779068,0.020743046,0.00045626744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026822946,0.000024744364,0.0000041780054,0.00017756724,0.0002260092,7.4641423e-7,0.00057181524,6.3975796e-7,0.0000057889397,0.016601792,0.9816715,0.00044699977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14326029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006896178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.961305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043966845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027245865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378176817","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v16n2p58","title":"Reviewer Acknowledgements for Journal of Politics and Law, Vol. 16, No. 2","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law; Sociology; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.04087694016915497,"score_gpt":0.33860427066508403,"score_spread":0.29772733049592903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378176817","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37575164,0.05384585,0.0008222294,0.020200271,0.06520516,0.0011805905,0.00038018852,0.00005206405,0.482562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9682455,0.011308597,0.00038201403,0.0021531063,0.013270142,0.0000020502707,0.0000013292736,0.00001183143,0.004625411],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998937,0.0000508141,0.00040324178,0.000053723103,0.00029880603,0.0002564126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929301,0.00017659448,0.0002655376,0.000033349086,0.006406199,0.00018821191],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008882514,0.0000732347,0.00026586597,0.0000559856,0.00057477143,0.00006432444,0.00010270801,0.000047640373,0.000038230864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030789447,0.0000559528,0.00010515708,0.00008628258,0.00062231516,0.00014812603,0.000043390537,0.00010642668,0.000011259305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005456652,0.000029905912,0.00062265625,0.000039728362,0.00007881624,0.0000045802904,0.00057871797,3.125017e-7,0.0000048145184,0.9075994,0.09063785,0.00039778958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032786708,0.00012987766,0.00045464135,0.0001365398,0.000080096834,0.0000037716748,0.0008144493,0.0000020996738,0.000014554159,0.17487627,0.82310295,0.000056902543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037730427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045602003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7327231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006366591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018679426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44207355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378439274","doi":"10.1515/9780773574106-005","title":"IV The Supreme Court of Canada","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.018649107352518682,"score_gpt":0.2066137389977194,"score_spread":0.18796463164520072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378439274","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000010951978,0.000009127736,0.0000019691943,0.0011807246,0.00022692549,0.000285011,0.00052970456,0.00003940293,0.9977162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.034246165,0.0005031254,0.000007589168,0.00019443217,0.00015520376,7.000202e-7,0.000007254665,0.000011937561,0.9648736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849916,0.00007193491,0.00017013172,0.00026135586,0.0006935441,0.00030390802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991302,0.00014450449,0.00017354265,0.00022360469,0.0002130947,0.000115042574],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013726094,0.00021655341,0.0003230819,0.00004923433,0.0017801955,0.00001289066,0.0005684004,0.00019525865,0.00019858584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001602371,0.00019503321,0.00015136751,0.000015193398,0.0011610988,0.000048831742,0.00018739309,0.00027910955,0.0000043784707],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003688535,0.000004803129,0.000004190275,0.00000649088,0.000149988,0.000046867084,0.0002638186,0.000008084772,2.9058214e-7,0.9855337,0.013392047,0.0005528422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013334952,0.000012986237,0.000024339068,0.00006880243,0.00012568015,3.1537985e-7,0.00037883548,3.8558585e-7,0.000010898402,0.008481537,0.9905453,0.00021761251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8919958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.089889064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9771532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040897922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000860544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99951935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378976484","doi":"10.3167/hrrh.2023.490204","title":"Transatlantic Legal Networks","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Historical Reflections/Réflexions Historiques","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Promulgation; Reading (process); Constitution; Politics; Democracy; Law; Political science; Foundation (evidence); Key (lock); Human rights; Annals; Sociology; History; Classics","score_opus":0.06320276122559484,"score_gpt":0.34698837339095984,"score_spread":0.283785612165365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378976484","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013458391,0.0061162063,0.029768173,0.04295423,0.014397499,0.00055812614,0.0000097535685,0.0043643964,0.90048575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9061972,0.0048234095,0.00051214173,0.0005787808,0.0037858803,0.00019717951,0.000019510933,0.00003212503,0.08385381],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979283,0.00021773015,0.00034774753,0.00038204953,0.00053720357,0.0005869375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990028,0.00024777566,0.00007856744,0.00019264776,0.00022298345,0.00025519697],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005227636,0.00018466216,0.0002822621,0.0003375262,0.0036660323,0.000057454672,0.00025531964,0.00019378777,0.00015987745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038433,0.00019072018,0.00022081289,0.0021351858,0.00044162356,0.00027674364,0.00003557466,0.00033095275,0.00036619027],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003551072,0.000109379755,0.00017917101,0.0000039234737,0.000035657155,0.0000331226,0.002655019,0.00012900766,0.00008038873,0.7050664,0.28929797,0.002374465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009372467,0.00006105125,0.00019946322,0.000014704954,0.0000314447,0.000003678118,0.00029422092,0.00004130482,0.000004711666,0.017346269,0.9816806,0.00022887926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028425999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014009189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9048513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005015462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044780583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379113600","doi":"10.5937/zrpfns57-41810","title":"Freedom of expression of judges in Bosnia and Herzegovina","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta Novi Sad","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Oxford","keywords":"Dignity; Human rights; Impartiality; Political science; Law; Democracy; Legitimacy; Fundamental rights; Convention; Legislature; Expression (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03438328803836548,"score_gpt":0.3116336844336658,"score_spread":0.2772503963953003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379113600","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95764285,0.0022593301,0.00006085008,0.0018710474,0.00031154626,0.00030618638,0.0000709557,0.000078725214,0.03739853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980218,0.0011624483,0.00043850392,0.000034853696,0.00011604261,0.000011992527,0.000007711907,0.0000073019896,0.00019935735],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854654,0.00013692008,0.0003478555,0.00023895444,0.00044272584,0.0002870248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920297,0.0003165884,0.00015500006,0.00013939587,0.00011821758,0.00006783259],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006643428,0.00012108311,0.00032204695,0.00016816238,0.00023487567,0.000014206665,0.00020846771,0.00010720223,0.000064144006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00070303574,0.000109241366,0.000059203347,0.00077194034,0.0009739032,0.0001540121,0.00015339143,0.00011544325,0.00002517007],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025997663,0.00044357745,0.5764695,0.00023202997,0.00011043058,0.000060135513,0.029857753,0.00018849075,0.04468078,0.31061134,0.010078801,0.027007183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024514112,0.00026349467,0.8023134,0.0007107553,0.000084596395,0.0000033219555,0.03142021,0.00010563803,0.007138081,0.03906489,0.115704976,0.0007392545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074321274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037460565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27154645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003473602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015760917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99917746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379743106","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12653","title":"Legitimacy and online proceedings: Procedural justice, access to justice, and the role of income","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Israel Science Foundation; University of Toronto; University of Michigan","keywords":"Legitimacy; Procedural justice; Economic Justice; Perception; Political science; Law and economics; Public relations; Law; Social psychology; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.0372675933224029,"score_gpt":0.35971346724323106,"score_spread":0.32244587392082813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379743106","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06631403,0.67893094,0.0000030065833,0.11837058,0.00033843855,0.003691974,0.00008476155,0.00025814556,0.13200812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2859099,0.70264024,0.00014176226,0.010685995,0.00035351692,0.00011086741,0.0000034056281,0.0000065409954,0.00014782553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991316,0.000027807133,0.00020759593,0.0001664485,0.00026577074,0.00020078552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994626,0.00014649754,0.00008643473,0.000046681376,0.00018320371,0.000074582465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066989,0.00009299781,0.00029502215,0.0000020097739,0.0008655376,0.00007011638,0.00020610885,0.00003317255,0.000009546978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032627868,0.000060437535,0.00008561405,0.0006291626,0.0011315141,0.00020936834,0.00025399256,0.000088220804,0.000008125298],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009528237,0.000021002357,0.0012750442,0.0029131975,0.000051701383,3.0298085e-7,0.0034022296,3.3820552e-7,0.000009020308,0.974985,0.010398153,0.0069344738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004992043,0.00003218462,0.007997242,0.0033628147,0.0012543813,0.0000031636284,0.016280778,0.000041978023,0.000006012788,0.052456148,0.91780484,0.00026127163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006441038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040257798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92252886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017406783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007607835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66571033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380232088","doi":"10.1515/9780773587014-010","title":"Canada: Federal and Sub-national Constitutional Practices","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public administration; Geography","score_opus":0.03674015013221284,"score_gpt":0.2441903977931211,"score_spread":0.20745024766090825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380232088","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000011754543,0.00003651604,0.000010566179,0.0015259961,0.0003485535,0.0002551716,0.00093604124,0.0000563973,0.996819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11469765,0.001027781,0.00006630534,0.00059432845,0.0007044036,0.000002207907,0.000055702596,0.000013590932,0.882838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816996,0.00007412201,0.00016117882,0.0003424228,0.0009147559,0.00033755112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998597,0.0002469445,0.00038926763,0.000085100095,0.00044546765,0.0002362122],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021508143,0.00025441585,0.00028211623,0.00008198405,0.00280393,0.000048778817,0.00021785982,0.0002585824,0.00007377366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010541667,0.00029071435,0.000082186896,0.000012000338,0.0023148675,0.00025017504,0.00024473245,0.0003315982,0.0000074312024],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039818882,0.000009309808,0.00006021558,0.000010341986,0.00017976368,0.000050021856,0.00007035015,0.0000016527136,6.638023e-7,0.98903096,0.010151141,0.0003957735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021421834,0.0000088292,0.00017628341,0.000050247192,0.00011003513,0.0000025090949,0.00014778969,3.83565e-7,0.0000060610205,0.0065204543,0.992428,0.0003351736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72950464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04980023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9825105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087158807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024543034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380520798","doi":"10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.281","title":"Human Rights Risks in the Constitutions of the American Federal States","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Criminology and Sociology","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Constitution; Law; Fundamental rights; Political science; Novelty; Argumentative; Law and economics; Axiology; Sociology","score_opus":0.10150367057935293,"score_gpt":0.39482295734137507,"score_spread":0.2933192867620221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380520798","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9786389,0.00028949144,0.00001574793,0.01704051,0.0006171233,0.000042667874,0.000011257998,0.000001797624,0.0033424888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987024,0.00007327982,0.00001152262,0.0010467173,0.00014354954,0.0000048277043,9.390871e-7,7.041707e-7,0.000016027903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876636,0.00063015317,0.00022587046,0.00005404277,0.00022136015,0.00010222111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999232,0.00028757288,0.00029078446,0.000032054235,0.00014490208,0.000012713931],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057208637,0.00004099007,0.0001377278,0.000065949425,0.0012152054,0.0000070064507,0.00042387724,0.000025112287,0.000049621223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008904792,0.000024802563,0.00006645202,0.000025539051,0.0050931713,0.00003882918,0.0000929247,0.00030513646,4.0189408e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026201556,0.00005570502,0.040939216,2.492518e-7,0.000069444126,0.00001720021,0.010195965,0.00006311588,0.000026360422,0.94804174,0.00034439145,0.0002204314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022522727,0.00009891631,0.2812125,0.0000029951896,0.000015963415,0.00006676895,0.008239574,0.0000010095168,0.0000052946207,0.69044423,0.019655969,0.00003152973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075022387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25759748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006113218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014267949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380523386","doi":"10.6000/1929-4409.2017.06.02","title":"A Case Study: Lessons from the Hong Kong Independent Commission Against Corruption","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Criminology and Sociology","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Language change; Commission; Institution; Perspective (graphical); Deterrence theory; Political science; Public administration; Public relations; Business; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.14507759183540397,"score_gpt":0.39374935675215483,"score_spread":0.24867176491675086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380523386","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9632575,0.00050760375,0.0004236602,0.033305436,0.0014845552,0.00006121678,0.000009515065,0.0000074777518,0.0009430662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99772704,0.00079843076,0.000020849675,0.00058703026,0.0008104888,0.0000026752582,6.9849636e-7,0.0000022019403,0.000050580147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988217,0.00046237974,0.0002554038,0.00010363648,0.0002272492,0.00012963839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983851,0.0009467128,0.00022554868,0.00004536217,0.00034847035,0.0000488378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006059847,0.00006866508,0.00015509575,0.000050297658,0.00057179964,0.000018083674,0.00026402235,0.00012217803,0.000063636595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047362532,0.000037441205,0.00006008121,0.000008836145,0.0014671065,0.00012598158,0.00009931361,0.00019735435,0.0000066682323],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002629499,0.0002966853,0.21492836,5.662733e-7,0.0007962238,0.004200585,0.05965877,0.0000036201109,0.00084302365,0.6058686,0.0010084432,0.11213221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027704434,0.0003805462,0.3875302,0.00007645488,0.00017970338,0.0018419116,0.08402353,0.0000031962038,0.0000361429,0.50013804,0.022800555,0.00021925003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018396905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00070255453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17260185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008564751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015656766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54056156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380629606","doi":"10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.282","title":"Protection Indicator in the Constitutions of the European Federations","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Criminology and Sociology","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Human rights; Novelty; Fundamental rights; Dialectic; Law; Identification (biology); Constitutional court; Constitutional law; Constitutional review; Law and economics; Sociology; Constitution; Psychology","score_opus":0.08526016487779756,"score_gpt":0.3342918106050398,"score_spread":0.24903164572724226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380629606","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94571793,0.00033317847,0.00020997136,0.037581343,0.0010613288,0.00008804188,0.000007778428,0.0000023638565,0.01499807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998927,0.0000958411,0.00001306186,0.0007468137,0.00019174823,0.00000773263,5.785426e-7,8.247144e-7,0.000016422953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983682,0.0011253224,0.00020299651,0.00004525081,0.00018999261,0.00006822229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995004,0.00015050433,0.00019854931,0.000028939778,0.00011186657,0.000009723064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001049699,0.000030572035,0.00007449922,0.00006956587,0.00092002837,0.000007335377,0.00032828472,0.000027775795,0.00004627771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029958473,0.000019610505,0.000049125352,0.000022392649,0.0018938879,0.000045568424,0.00008117387,0.0002917524,9.1716885e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015755511,0.0000539269,0.006779023,3.5319584e-7,0.00004239695,0.000009088031,0.014564082,0.000041522733,0.00008236957,0.97706145,0.00021025907,0.0011397771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005490728,0.00013032525,0.32807624,0.000008791145,0.000039386905,0.00027633455,0.019700361,0.0000031192928,0.000018091992,0.5606572,0.09047776,0.00006330757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034601227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010036845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41640422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005398995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024532402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70762074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380763104","doi":"10.1353/book4750","title":"Constitutional Politics in Canada and the United States","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"State University of New York Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law; Political economy; Sociology","score_opus":0.02973519143216795,"score_gpt":0.21504476240009462,"score_spread":0.18530957096792666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380763104","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011045876,0.00074595533,0.00007710986,0.00056118227,0.00013708157,0.0002968369,0.00036940322,0.000013490698,0.9966943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05203246,0.0016982422,0.000056939793,0.0003308211,0.00011983987,3.5990794e-7,0.0000795081,0.0000054729376,0.9456764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990879,0.000076830984,0.00012798648,0.00014464118,0.0003485676,0.00021402848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993721,0.00022552749,0.00012532157,0.00007116327,0.0001039295,0.000101906175],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000119061755,0.00011936686,0.0002470856,0.000045838875,0.00052088266,0.0000133034655,0.00022942908,0.00006488693,0.000016912403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021511118,0.00011205221,0.00004129962,0.000026859625,0.0060964455,0.000022871216,0.00010531399,0.00019560585,5.4703645e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057565998,0.0000030548138,0.00005823187,0.000011764604,0.00007284087,0.00003213221,0.01156659,0.00036266603,1.8060089e-8,0.980162,0.007369291,0.0003038348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008600441,0.000005416442,0.00007618918,0.00012481523,0.00004244789,6.4845284e-7,0.0031092304,0.000004135265,4.168542e-7,0.13342735,0.8622328,0.00011649376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99894977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9954597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8548635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001247072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020426186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381187418","doi":"10.46692/9781529222036.067","title":"Access to Justice","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Business; Law","score_opus":0.06709172330569699,"score_gpt":0.3805276435418158,"score_spread":0.31343592023611877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381187418","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[7.4006897e-7,0.00036007143,0.000055593708,0.0046407077,0.0009867499,0.00017153201,0.00001773498,0.00017238157,0.99359447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00036997895,0.0002535812,0.00006585448,0.0036739323,0.0012003583,0.000041054576,0.0000031024597,0.000029240979,0.9943629],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937344,0.000031100535,0.000043572825,0.00012741695,0.00029026766,0.00013419251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99982464,0.000026718313,0.000022348311,0.000054803542,0.0000135533055,0.00005790425],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008717015,0.00005756174,0.00008974589,0.00006292849,0.000499667,0.00004163762,0.00031621518,0.00004248343,0.16226606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008962277,0.00005248288,0.00002726842,0.00021860449,0.00011222595,0.000020750027,0.00021584732,0.0000559768,0.00080161676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.2328915e-7,0.0000048471247,0.00007278912,0.000001512108,0.00000938682,0.0000016236833,0.00014801105,2.5528232e-7,2.37245e-8,0.30792144,0.6910778,0.00076179334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014925939,0.0000035376777,0.00007370736,0.000005402845,0.000022806085,4.086783e-8,0.0012457703,1.3709167e-8,4.868794e-8,0.0018065176,0.9967429,0.0000843083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06161608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07601546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3061149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000062471576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015071125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381431771","doi":"10.1093/icon/moad025","title":"Theorizing about the executive in the modern state","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Plural; Law; State (computer science); Separation of powers; Corporate governance; Power (physics); Judicial review; Law and economics; Democracy; Executive branch; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics; Computer science; Economics; Philosophy; Management","score_opus":0.03773854049261411,"score_gpt":0.3417221363990461,"score_spread":0.303983595906432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381431771","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054254714,0.0014906187,0.0035455693,0.096378766,0.0051250015,0.0003488549,0.00010041143,0.00004921332,0.83870685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99646443,0.0004836091,0.000029490951,0.0019754039,0.0008397299,0.000008896998,0.0000033395947,0.0000020944217,0.0001930132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997836,0.00023552476,0.00036447454,0.00008934938,0.0012723943,0.00020227622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982617,0.00084497913,0.00019532313,0.00005898331,0.0006005647,0.000038457398],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020857514,0.0000833519,0.00011844302,0.00011393592,0.0007025531,0.00014002954,0.0008341156,0.00003330219,0.00003849857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004242933,0.000047744405,0.00013015218,0.00032348884,0.0034600534,0.00032943318,0.00006677334,0.00026314345,0.000053397976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046860903,0.00003077663,0.0010624569,4.1635843e-7,0.000083784755,0.00012028313,0.0048221196,0.0008653466,0.000022425776,0.99003386,0.0015235763,0.0013881006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002724675,0.000012156985,0.004258834,0.000059246595,0.00001084928,0.00005437084,0.0025376102,0.000033888336,0.000012029337,0.6840495,0.3086317,0.00006736114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011030178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015130324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9422097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013947961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065642537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99925196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381436136","doi":"10.1111/josp.12540","title":"Federalism as an institutional doctrine","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Philosophy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Doctrine; Politics; Political science; Mainstream; Ideology; Law; Law and economics; Corporate governance; Sociology; New Federalism; Public administration; Economics","score_opus":0.06279266203403625,"score_gpt":0.3533331905862674,"score_spread":0.2905405285522311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381436136","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43553317,0.0002347555,0.000047142214,0.07915755,0.0022475005,0.00013116939,0.000016885911,0.00011359738,0.48251823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904282,0.00020781848,0.000063292384,0.00080430025,0.008294645,0.000002205689,0.0000031183997,0.0000048071147,0.00019157666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984805,0.00010630668,0.00029594675,0.00009487765,0.00079571124,0.00022668466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919677,0.00007036713,0.00019416443,0.00003540646,0.0003627819,0.00014052022],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068711897,0.00008653956,0.00020299079,0.0001512726,0.0021818054,0.00007066889,0.00024239637,0.00008489689,0.00013757621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003081931,0.000078623794,0.00016880495,0.0005581241,0.0006858349,0.00048525972,0.000042348078,0.00019871649,0.00019266605],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004082287,0.000057619083,0.00043011887,0.000002214877,0.000049516053,0.00007654156,0.00426425,0.000006237838,0.000029772165,0.9918521,0.0016087603,0.0015820599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002556638,0.00007300598,0.008031663,0.000017383018,0.000018319832,0.000008769804,0.0012040329,7.259931e-7,0.0000061412293,0.9266344,0.063653864,0.00009607571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045612606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007965462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55489504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011720378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059788267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381513502","doi":"10.1177/10659129231183915","title":"Hierarchical Interactions and Compliance in Comparative Courts","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Scholarship; Compliance (psychology); Context (archaeology); Hierarchy; Certiorari; Judicial independence; Judicial opinion; Original jurisdiction; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.3859601098573573,"score_gpt":0.5436304890340797,"score_spread":0.15767037917672244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381513502","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.658359,0.000085967484,0.000041211537,0.049663704,0.00014482616,0.00027309667,0.000021389973,0.00008061998,0.2913302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99899614,0.000023708946,0.000023130495,0.00010109625,0.00019647038,0.00004877741,0.0000025168954,0.000002230292,0.00060590566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979315,0.000438304,0.0001321941,0.00018573269,0.0005373246,0.00077499123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99770004,0.001793392,0.000007538602,0.00005972969,0.00015224585,0.00028708667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094275427,0.00005391436,0.00012951941,0.00017896062,0.0007392683,0.00007784728,0.000118686556,0.000033213062,0.0000630557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045351338,0.000050405535,0.000021919283,0.000533766,0.0023910461,0.00012289658,0.000041581272,0.00038191807,0.00050000416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013606799,0.000039838,0.0020933002,0.0000030358383,0.0000053299414,0.0000193958,0.0066600554,1.2035188e-7,0.000019200093,0.9872698,0.0012573679,0.0026189082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016791768,0.00012838365,0.11506942,0.000058258596,0.0000014525248,0.0000013132793,0.030129664,0.0002717908,0.000004277179,0.8185661,0.035512928,0.000088531415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014208171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012019766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34063715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013389347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020232284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9923563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381895764","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4480057","title":"Can Informal Judicial Norms Protect Against Political Pressure?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.014175166291427356,"score_gpt":0.2772013766154086,"score_spread":0.26302621032398127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381895764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4883618,0.0022685395,0.000548611,0.064873084,0.002350932,0.0009971658,0.00003941506,0.0006601844,0.43990025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940018,0.0015682734,0.0000050373233,0.00038915704,0.0020345438,0.000018248382,0.0000038132584,0.000008538376,0.0019705629],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99538696,0.0000981815,0.0002491492,0.00014098697,0.0006628178,0.0034619146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945325,0.000056520716,0.000081517144,0.00006627115,0.00014137963,0.00020107786],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018405691,0.00012633429,0.00017610003,0.00012699331,0.0020263188,0.000088600274,0.00030452697,0.0000996397,0.00002895642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003922309,0.000106699874,0.00012560483,0.0005268181,0.00048487735,0.00021897501,0.00007304868,0.0011889258,0.00015383189],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023010754,0.000016911725,0.0023365493,0.0000016947499,0.00011440141,0.0000069599896,0.00092808245,0.000019267041,0.000014636963,0.9875165,0.00031147798,0.008710479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040173807,0.00013611776,0.0049899425,0.000021011714,0.000042940446,0.000028391867,0.013613327,0.00002093574,0.00001796775,0.8837658,0.09671859,0.00024324295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067818635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03812871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50564003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005297605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006464571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382064905","doi":"10.1017/s0003055423000606","title":"Social Capital, Institutional Rules, and Constitutional Amendment Rates","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"University of Maryland, Baltimore County","keywords":"Constitutional amendment; Social capital; Political science; Politics; Amendment; First amendment; Democracy; Law; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.055987379608976845,"score_gpt":0.40014877691334616,"score_spread":0.34416139730436934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382064905","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24512462,0.023610432,0.00045765474,0.32741645,0.00079965155,0.001432794,0.0002108125,0.0006441365,0.40030342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9794001,0.016336547,0.000093303395,0.003751207,0.0002896854,0.000048624188,0.000008436017,0.0000021480944,0.00006993096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974405,0.0000961808,0.00023668532,0.00034279728,0.0009146925,0.00096914545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990635,0.0001611124,0.00006497903,0.00006922277,0.0001776996,0.0004634947],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012427766,0.00012177897,0.00028426372,0.00009244404,0.0030205878,0.00008190916,0.00026128435,0.000021552336,0.00009946586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009746162,0.00010278627,0.00006871302,0.0015401158,0.07837607,0.0002666023,0.00017075025,0.00010321197,0.0004316572],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.618111e-7,0.00001823784,0.00075951545,0.000023835057,0.000006679397,0.0000065713994,0.00016652998,1.1364024e-7,0.000013495847,0.98847425,0.0014259662,0.009103837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020438418,0.00006980911,0.03732266,0.0006070355,0.000077163604,0.000024546029,0.004084017,0.00000969696,0.000019432322,0.2963814,0.6606362,0.0005636603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036641546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000904692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7342755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035364227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018872379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99827737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382279534","doi":"10.1515/9780228004639-007","title":"Quebec, Bengal, and the Rise of Authoritarian Legal Pluralism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; BENGAL; Pluralism (philosophy); Political science; Legal pluralism; Ancient history; Law; History; Democracy; Philosophy; Epistemology; Archaeology; Legal realism; Legal profession; Politics","score_opus":0.01953587703652543,"score_gpt":0.22141338888067325,"score_spread":0.20187751184414782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382279534","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000007569623,0.000035272104,0.00000940206,0.0066935522,0.00021203123,0.00040672417,0.0003126394,0.000069310525,0.9922535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05147758,0.00076132326,0.00004424098,0.00013913504,0.00027066894,0.0000013551997,0.0000072862454,0.000015873555,0.94728255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986288,0.00016100226,0.00019580836,0.00033514792,0.00046259485,0.00021667407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990804,0.00019344866,0.00022369612,0.0001680492,0.00018931158,0.00014505054],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002145279,0.00024351644,0.00046706773,0.0000650825,0.0020720724,0.000039742463,0.00041359355,0.00026719266,0.000029374152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005360498,0.00021126133,0.00021270933,0.00001765874,0.003231495,0.00011872548,0.0004328934,0.000411165,0.0000046690993],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014957126,0.0000046831074,0.0000018255512,0.000013246971,0.00020173917,0.000053931064,0.0010226745,9.1176287e-7,5.204999e-7,0.99525195,0.0025542916,0.0007446604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059040886,0.000019211611,0.000016543163,0.00007002332,0.00027583668,3.7236256e-7,0.0012859367,0.0000016713557,0.0000059588733,0.016197106,0.9813044,0.0002325225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30823097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001387718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9790548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014018097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018900374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99948114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382365192","doi":"10.1017/9781009072144.005","title":"Narratives of Education and Constraint","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"International Institute for Sustainable Development","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Rationality; Normative; Political science; Corporate governance; Constraint (computer-aided design); Epistemology; Law; Engineering; Management; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03922363102266783,"score_gpt":0.2503923463930196,"score_spread":0.21116871537035178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382365192","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031866026,0.00024047573,0.00001683365,0.000110504785,0.00026754977,0.00017412868,0.000102204176,0.000043295528,0.99872637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020251067,0.00041276315,0.000024398083,0.0000191322,0.000117682765,4.2759325e-7,0.000007500278,0.000005595594,0.97916144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994567,0.000026991465,0.00008447066,0.00016433749,0.00017008102,0.000097404925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995327,0.00005171246,0.00011041188,0.000067639034,0.00017272648,0.00006481032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000083507286,0.00010025943,0.0001785601,0.000074884665,0.0003796339,0.0000112958005,0.00011338168,0.00012649498,0.0000031464112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019205876,0.00011688943,0.000059203077,0.0000075926837,0.0018869764,0.000037923048,0.0001007437,0.000104767896,0.0000040223526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008595009,0.0000046234472,0.0000066026446,0.00001438092,0.00005901233,0.000006337638,0.0015012528,4.8251092e-8,0.0000060045254,0.99033225,0.0055397977,0.0025211084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008319595,0.000015173288,0.00008316551,0.00015596753,0.000053914457,7.835924e-7,0.008028591,1.5384816e-7,0.000008275773,0.0022143298,0.9892136,0.00014285352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00221341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001284179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98811793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006577042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005074131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69526434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382449017","doi":"10.1111/capa.12519","title":"How binding are binding guidelines? An analytical framework","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Scope (computer science); CLARITY; Political science; Management science; Law and economics; Law; Computer science; Sociology; Engineering; Chemistry","score_opus":0.1706579106197999,"score_gpt":0.3833509941849384,"score_spread":0.2126930835651385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382449017","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3841108,0.000055237375,0.0005352335,0.58613807,0.0011262624,0.00027214474,0.00014714789,0.00031934568,0.027295738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962194,0.000032261367,0.0001644701,0.00055539067,0.0010972006,0.000018358178,0.00011979145,0.0000074553354,0.0017856762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859774,0.00007321089,0.00017304908,0.0002490144,0.00037546983,0.00053149165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987131,0.000077799574,0.00007468247,0.00011814503,0.00029154663,0.0007247276],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006186858,0.0001000092,0.00012203055,0.00032129613,0.0019082326,0.00068558543,0.00020921764,0.00016642801,0.00013197419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002979103,0.00010692541,0.00004900529,0.0013626419,0.0002951431,0.00059779675,0.00001558376,0.00013716472,0.00017202711],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012913911,0.0000062138015,0.014252777,0.0000015404862,0.000013899667,0.00004062739,0.00020153406,3.6823766e-7,0.0000043595105,0.9714637,0.011026234,0.0029874474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007185778,0.000041618612,0.007520472,0.00003696957,0.000016959972,0.0000029253395,0.01976324,0.00026553212,0.0000060991597,0.016217027,0.9557748,0.00028248862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009775147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7066685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9552467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035908326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028679718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99939114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382985363","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v16n3p21","title":"Anglo-American Elements of Constitutional Organization in the Constitutional Arrangement of Bosnia and Herzegovina: An Influence on Rule of Law through Legislative Function","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Legislature; Law; Normative; Constitutional review; Political science; Politics; Constitutional law; Rule of law; Constitutional court; Law and economics; Constitution; Sociology","score_opus":0.02970376498961123,"score_gpt":0.3154254541413992,"score_spread":0.28572168915178797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382985363","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96944183,0.00013283892,0.00022287344,0.0010802228,0.00010431408,0.00010202369,0.000072248135,0.0000029242071,0.028840715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992839,0.0001979804,0.00009116921,0.0003432977,0.00007284005,8.949735e-7,0.000003990321,0.0000011433269,0.0000047527565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903363,0.000090415604,0.0003226825,0.00006193128,0.0003869481,0.00010438761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990522,0.00013222007,0.00030862345,0.000034576802,0.00044075504,0.00003162174],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044956183,0.00005533404,0.00016533183,0.000047872836,0.0002503869,0.000011584378,0.000067199035,0.000023949811,0.00000950541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012794558,0.000041248964,0.0000213414,0.00029723084,0.0056742937,0.00019426599,0.000019565443,0.0000656944,3.5239145e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020127356,0.000079281795,0.024499098,0.000008608407,0.000035588266,0.0000018810792,0.002882573,0.00009129311,0.00019618607,0.97208273,0.000035178928,0.00006746824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018678686,0.0014652085,0.4394499,0.0003970631,0.0001826407,0.000017976778,0.029329378,0.000021514907,0.0008882436,0.47843018,0.04770251,0.000247504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047863135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006827829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49365252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034912184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023713858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383455346","doi":"10.1515/9780773571594-005","title":"Civil Liberties and Canadian Federalism","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Civil liberties; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.020453209986756395,"score_gpt":0.20842510775721967,"score_spread":0.18797189777046328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383455346","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000014181926,0.000020473979,0.0000016433211,0.0016532762,0.0002405433,0.0002699389,0.00031807128,0.00010238127,0.9973795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04843012,0.00093002483,0.000022341505,0.00041790327,0.00018887126,9.606593e-7,0.000011719053,0.000018337292,0.9499797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986989,0.000041821677,0.00012730532,0.00037307502,0.00034886898,0.00041002332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917257,0.000049645576,0.000097611,0.00014032074,0.00016018549,0.0003796895],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000090954694,0.0002722278,0.00031620197,0.00017005624,0.003167284,0.00007224414,0.0002706124,0.00037829418,0.000099783116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016167123,0.0003162067,0.000120445584,0.000012001803,0.0012269848,0.00011742029,0.00019683292,0.00029749464,0.000015352925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013058186,0.0000028636075,0.000006835747,0.0000108666145,0.00011001399,0.00014286255,0.0010672533,0.0000016128051,1.479676e-7,0.99644285,0.0016668653,0.00053476996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020251815,0.000017304557,0.000032620217,0.00013189737,0.000097986274,7.2542133e-7,0.0003027002,8.638518e-8,0.0000029288778,0.044727728,0.95413023,0.00035329445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8439037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09247447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9524633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075097854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005983296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383455740","doi":"10.1515/9780773573062-006","title":"Constitutional Politics in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.020645569629493973,"score_gpt":0.21707438425508446,"score_spread":0.19642881462559048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383455740","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000009859465,0.0000090372005,0.0000072135554,0.00078541896,0.00034016997,0.0002515053,0.00083580834,0.000048458467,0.99771255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06446723,0.00037148147,0.000042980057,0.00041792553,0.00036632956,0.0000010544713,0.000024076699,0.000009157182,0.93429977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983287,0.000054773453,0.00020752821,0.0003429435,0.0006308418,0.00043523466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992076,0.00012324705,0.0001326379,0.00014454706,0.00019189702,0.00020002927],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009377843,0.0002555379,0.00034437925,0.00009083757,0.0012007608,0.000016421329,0.0003534065,0.00023729626,0.00013430939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002639092,0.000313071,0.00010848834,0.000017104161,0.0017912997,0.00008439744,0.0002098579,0.0003871226,0.000013236547],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012755547,0.0000066843263,0.000051111754,0.0000061841715,0.000065992244,0.00022807102,0.00008577648,0.000023145218,6.7910086e-8,0.9965994,0.002408321,0.00051248877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025226126,0.0000062587865,0.00004958431,0.000097347314,0.000056181118,8.664172e-7,0.00031115473,7.190251e-7,0.000002690923,0.0069442517,0.9919362,0.00034246672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9776236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.51706874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98965514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003459121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031601922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384070204","doi":"10.1007/s41020-023-00196-x","title":"Critical constitutionalism: An inquiry into the past, present, and future","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jindal Global Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Politics; Democracy; Law; Objectivity (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Political economy; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05658166047038281,"score_gpt":0.3959888398842407,"score_spread":0.3394071794138579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384070204","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019087023,0.24752302,0.000020937016,0.3905868,0.0019623558,0.00069733185,0.00006777082,0.00023617783,0.35699692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7192524,0.22702247,0.00016960158,0.029726647,0.023386165,0.00018498869,0.000055204666,0.000009640534,0.00019286282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986775,0.00024658183,0.00017629286,0.00021280005,0.00042705322,0.00025977253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994399,0.00011726155,0.00003128447,0.000116498224,0.0001533079,0.0001417541],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000643532,0.00010247226,0.00019525175,0.0000068456798,0.0016303472,0.00008291482,0.00020885305,0.00006107608,0.000102867336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013593184,0.00006685626,0.00006767868,0.0004793534,0.003415437,0.00021872262,0.00012687845,0.00009352442,0.00016664939],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024509109,0.000013665395,0.0004164253,0.00006604897,0.000013308109,0.000009975014,0.00037537699,1.6587016e-7,1.1639634e-7,0.96725273,0.018850138,0.012999571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004144266,0.000012170349,0.0025136264,0.00016008086,0.000042128555,0.000005423913,0.00064184616,6.485472e-7,5.508291e-8,0.081441104,0.91505677,0.00008471741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005565589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022878037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8962066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055201894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016633228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384078865","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4507012","title":"Electoral College and Election Fraud","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Spoilt vote; Electoral college; Law; General election; Group voting ticket; Voting; Politics","score_opus":0.014585767601423149,"score_gpt":0.28575665904984376,"score_spread":0.2711708914484206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384078865","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94507176,0.0051791533,0.00040793032,0.013058103,0.00083088514,0.00020137607,0.0000051736247,0.0002415278,0.03500409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98548925,0.0105885845,0.000005192729,0.000090222464,0.0007577617,0.0000048290035,9.965939e-7,0.0000052244427,0.003057929],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794984,0.00008700396,0.00011591036,0.00011496024,0.00028738365,0.0014448896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971855,0.000051876315,0.0000478667,0.00002961118,0.00008056747,0.00007153197],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013649862,0.000071746785,0.0001003322,0.00009985703,0.0017653669,0.000043550768,0.0000943925,0.000055068307,0.000027736545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014040596,0.00006568548,0.000046180583,0.0006045205,0.00020961277,0.00015288692,0.000022652597,0.0005864127,0.00008108117],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015550988,0.000009711295,0.006863196,5.321736e-7,0.000050703005,0.0000033087574,0.00024506697,0.0000015656584,0.0000794358,0.9833555,0.0014926242,0.007882812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023349097,0.00011536836,0.009155945,0.0000068255035,0.000018263965,0.000046414458,0.005933609,0.000010369251,0.000015555806,0.9083472,0.07599464,0.00012233347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026857303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047262065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07500831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005145617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020119762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384166938","doi":"10.1515/9780773570573-005","title":"Judicial Supervision of the Political Process: Canadian and American Responses to Homosexual Rights Challenges","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Process (computing); Political science; Political process; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.030889609094539274,"score_gpt":0.24606724759470083,"score_spread":0.21517763850016156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384166938","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008925384,0.000015155739,4.2762633e-7,0.005439955,0.00013617259,0.00040728913,0.000503834,0.000037783193,0.9925668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67819095,0.00039146366,0.000019554927,0.00033412597,0.00023727152,0.0000020035868,0.000002611013,0.000016888342,0.3208051],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983359,0.00013435917,0.00016263036,0.0003893736,0.00052358524,0.0004541742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884886,0.00015342567,0.00010921441,0.00019901087,0.00026312805,0.0004263937],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000113151036,0.00023929996,0.00038379576,0.00019452267,0.0018404463,0.00001800789,0.00043461393,0.0002080453,0.000024054116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000066870685,0.00020963977,0.00010294629,0.00003398345,0.0022561187,0.00006011475,0.0002397656,0.00025482118,0.0000046532173],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005484584,0.0000093568215,0.000029816432,0.0000122336105,0.000062980995,0.00003309117,0.0014717164,2.8130097e-7,4.0826674e-7,0.9967611,0.00028794073,0.0012762499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012863668,0.0000912692,0.00039736152,0.0001414743,0.00010125471,9.0884225e-7,0.0024240834,2.151399e-7,0.000014150076,0.015581038,0.9808466,0.0002730109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.60603124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043760385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032562535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030804717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384196419","doi":"10.1515/9780773568891-004","title":"Judicial Politics in Canada: Patterns and Trends","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0214145504689917,"score_gpt":0.21879007752483856,"score_spread":0.19737552705584685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384196419","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015787782,0.000006524078,0.0000027629821,0.0006179548,0.00023459981,0.0001323288,0.00065351237,0.00003791486,0.99815655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18123417,0.0008807172,0.000005918749,0.00024920772,0.00028958268,8.004993e-7,0.00001779062,0.000016225284,0.81730556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985262,0.00005616106,0.00017761432,0.00035537503,0.00045963435,0.0004250008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993766,0.000080301106,0.00012147153,0.00012588804,0.00009999432,0.00019575877],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007720108,0.00025330333,0.000376151,0.00018724322,0.000954387,0.000018660803,0.0002492894,0.00022827821,0.000072270996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012116056,0.00030432976,0.000077756325,0.000022159284,0.0005024222,0.00006451938,0.0002444362,0.00032766024,0.0000016675266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015231537,0.0000052920373,0.0005490498,0.00000716596,0.000059805046,0.0003840719,0.00022393349,0.000001418498,3.9332235e-8,0.99473375,0.0010126948,0.003007566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002748839,0.000014467983,0.0013699654,0.0000998851,0.00008161693,9.018632e-7,0.0004981474,5.3809555e-7,0.0000010020167,0.004892058,0.99243355,0.00033296683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9948124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82255805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99142087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014554203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006503688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384253395","doi":"10.1515/9780773570573-006","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada and the Complexity of Judicial Activism","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Judicial activism; Law; Judicial review","score_opus":0.03441533953848956,"score_gpt":0.21658885261014196,"score_spread":0.18217351307165242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384253395","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000053663327,0.000017186627,0.0000033554352,0.0017700206,0.00018387467,0.00033906286,0.00035393666,0.000014867387,0.997264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41604713,0.0011646732,0.000009992996,0.000083414685,0.00013751804,0.0000010163509,0.0000028688467,0.000011019073,0.58254236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986289,0.00013178661,0.00019376203,0.00019466893,0.0006208182,0.00023007272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987341,0.00041327276,0.00032604157,0.00018275977,0.00027010604,0.000073681644],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026438708,0.00017673841,0.0003985869,0.000031760967,0.0022602293,0.000009324118,0.00042634163,0.00013291682,0.000020654124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000471998,0.00012870607,0.000124541,0.000014224234,0.007834325,0.000038529175,0.00029906808,0.00024960336,3.104261e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012351853,0.0000049317746,0.0000069535376,0.000008996566,0.00019972608,0.000007784277,0.0004271284,0.0000011417029,3.9826162e-7,0.9968218,0.0019696984,0.0004279218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042190985,0.000013860977,0.00014209983,0.000058444843,0.00015414045,3.0046647e-7,0.0004968503,0.0000018990318,0.000017864855,0.043571837,0.9549743,0.00014651699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.875138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11906432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018654758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003282237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384255512","doi":"10.1515/9780773575622-006","title":"The Federal Accountability Act: How Ottawa Steps Backward in Monitoring Political Ethics and Integrity","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Politics; Political science; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.07145389797335919,"score_gpt":0.3037481346411447,"score_spread":0.2322942366677855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384255512","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031789113,0.000015441483,0.000012399264,0.0033846563,0.00045738037,0.00039741493,0.000117563955,0.00007960518,0.9952176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54521143,0.0010852189,0.000103980885,0.00024951086,0.00069792836,0.000002747721,0.00000582776,0.000027959797,0.45261538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975964,0.0002909575,0.00022288131,0.00048294463,0.00075407897,0.00065272814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99766636,0.0013649634,0.0001424112,0.00022604698,0.00035660696,0.00024360784],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014062211,0.00031630142,0.00038837464,0.000097823744,0.004029211,0.00015355281,0.00045265426,0.0008230023,0.0000062354516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003299512,0.00028838543,0.00015545002,0.00002405348,0.0026175743,0.00017655126,0.0005153602,0.0023939025,0.0000028452264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006046263,0.000010848074,0.0012075121,0.000023119255,0.00006106158,0.000041846895,0.00081348955,1.4603933e-7,3.0753665e-7,0.9963722,0.00009668884,0.0013122796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024938543,0.000022638938,0.0015504935,0.00016349107,0.000054443586,6.9108984e-7,0.0046875146,3.985758e-7,0.000013947782,0.020518221,0.9723987,0.0003400697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.061288618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019287874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97585404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000987523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032794426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384256279","doi":"10.1515/9780773568891-020","title":"Public Opinion and Canada’s Courts","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public opinion; Political science; Law; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.03717498801793726,"score_gpt":0.22272849209530027,"score_spread":0.185553504077363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384256279","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000005228272,0.000016309616,0.0000070300666,0.0022049048,0.0004472796,0.00024992524,0.00028585247,0.00008037106,0.9967031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015117772,0.0024140223,0.000012874161,0.0002560113,0.00029123414,7.7275706e-7,0.000021489468,0.000015359316,0.9818705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853766,0.00005636814,0.0001342216,0.00037213025,0.00054725626,0.00035237815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999134,0.00008184387,0.00014450819,0.00014807988,0.00023903012,0.0002525098],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011480345,0.0002441952,0.00030252466,0.00009350764,0.0020675533,0.000041115403,0.0002822966,0.00026447856,0.000062470695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025962081,0.00028096946,0.00007878767,0.0000092477385,0.0007723685,0.00011029122,0.00028866896,0.00026607094,0.000003585845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013597874,0.0000043905457,0.000027116686,0.000008249731,0.00009720073,0.00009323513,0.00009147685,3.7858172e-7,8.191347e-8,0.9846089,0.013678341,0.0013770239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018274177,0.00001399322,0.000046858302,0.00006779703,0.000054378732,0.0000011931537,0.00020408102,2.4251267e-7,9.134711e-7,0.0065768114,0.99253553,0.00031546448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9256432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15377215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97885716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006232614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008431117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384519851","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4512508","title":"Electoral College and Election Fraud","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.014585767601423149,"score_gpt":0.28575665904984376,"score_spread":0.2711708914484206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384519851","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94507176,0.0051791533,0.00040793032,0.013058103,0.00083088514,0.00020137607,0.0000051736247,0.0002415278,0.03500409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98548925,0.0105885845,0.000005192729,0.000090222464,0.0007577617,0.0000048290035,9.965939e-7,0.0000052244427,0.003057929],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794984,0.00008700396,0.00011591036,0.00011496024,0.00028738365,0.0014448896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971855,0.000051876315,0.0000478667,0.00002961118,0.00008056747,0.00007153197],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013649862,0.000071746785,0.0001003322,0.00009985703,0.0017653669,0.000043550768,0.0000943925,0.000055068307,0.000027736545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014040596,0.00006568548,0.000046180583,0.0006045205,0.00020961277,0.00015288692,0.000022652597,0.0005864127,0.00008108117],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015550988,0.000009711295,0.006863196,5.321736e-7,0.000050703005,0.0000033087574,0.00024506697,0.0000015656584,0.0000794358,0.9833555,0.0014926242,0.007882812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023349097,0.00011536836,0.009155945,0.0000068255035,0.000018263965,0.000046414458,0.005933609,0.000010369251,0.000015555806,0.9083472,0.07599464,0.00012233347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026857303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047262065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07500831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005145617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020119762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384659488","doi":"10.33774/apsa-2021-kcnvt-v2","title":"Social Capital, Institutional Rules, and Constitutional Amendment Rates","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional amendment; Social capital; Political science; Amendment; Politics; Democracy; Law; First amendment; Law and economics; Transaction cost; Constitutional law; Economics","score_opus":0.09495986462048388,"score_gpt":0.35524443923939936,"score_spread":0.26028457461891547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384659488","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2614368,0.0056000627,0.006191909,0.07056205,0.007315248,0.001939051,0.0014506738,0.0014435122,0.6440607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99350214,0.0016442918,0.00032852037,0.00033445586,0.0017638641,0.00014047342,0.0002037153,0.000007383921,0.002075156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997934,0.000101825506,0.00031340332,0.00050045474,0.00075571664,0.00039462477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993122,0.00013336021,0.000113949936,0.00008041031,0.0002211998,0.00013885589],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004905973,0.00025111713,0.00033212456,0.00011981742,0.003290622,0.00021302883,0.00023805026,0.00030301022,0.00027768317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017322673,0.00024353788,0.00013234952,0.00013094186,0.015249402,0.00012222987,0.00076040346,0.0003781023,0.00035166496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008314911,0.00004324708,0.0014528838,0.000016883349,0.00012236953,0.000017854582,0.002125815,0.000026957541,0.00000527496,0.98435587,0.011396139,0.0004283652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029314175,0.000012683616,0.007209634,0.000094515475,0.00007279838,0.0000034288166,0.004154183,0.000011856303,0.000009689807,0.8351816,0.15242814,0.0005283113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009310103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030724292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7320653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033733185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021810688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99800694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385075537","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3894","title":"Social Rights and Transformative Private Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Private law; Legitimacy; Political science; Public law; Law; Law and economics; Doctrine; Sociology; Legal pluralism; International human rights law; Transformative learning; Comparative law; Human rights; Legal realism","score_opus":0.034893339934751466,"score_gpt":0.3089457904656493,"score_spread":0.27405245053089783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385075537","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013815592,0.00016046318,0.00007012857,0.006269825,0.00025214866,0.00007913316,0.000008416329,0.00007329621,0.979271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99850166,0.000201721,0.000050281087,0.0002985534,0.00071083923,0.0000039428523,0.0000014933133,0.0000036111765,0.00022788324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998961,0.00010549138,0.00016333663,0.00009300832,0.00036836587,0.00030880244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996715,0.000057196048,0.000057957204,0.000023460418,0.00007641304,0.000113453345],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004896918,0.000083082574,0.00013832048,0.000028795559,0.006084923,0.00013807621,0.000118761265,0.00006239162,0.00006804452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012317532,0.0000672725,0.00006928499,0.00017414031,0.000991193,0.00034508583,0.000028170727,0.00019681775,0.000093788316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010127346,0.000011480375,0.000056798835,0.0000017571844,0.000037674054,0.000022639595,0.008171249,0.0000010847136,0.000015893707,0.990079,0.00079809246,0.00079421466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022198062,0.000016937174,0.0006192117,0.000015120105,0.00001575834,0.000009975241,0.0013044915,0.0000024372566,0.00003285904,0.8234864,0.17418233,0.000092505514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051110648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23825169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9846861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048169237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042908774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99520904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385080226","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3875","title":"The Notwithstanding Clause in Canada: The First Forty Years","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Period (music); Law; Political science; Physics","score_opus":0.03167387430752809,"score_gpt":0.2660268809878027,"score_spread":0.2343530066802746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385080226","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06325706,0.001243007,0.000015963225,0.054527253,0.0021305152,0.00020606954,0.000010990933,0.000037747308,0.8785714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979621,0.0010658283,0.0000037588163,0.00042790573,0.00036462126,0.000004965347,2.3150494e-7,0.0000034579734,0.00016708428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988895,0.00006984223,0.0001569701,0.00007043155,0.0004665523,0.00034667188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994735,0.000299079,0.00006164787,0.000060537117,0.000043941644,0.00006130053],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096070213,0.00005438056,0.00007715214,0.000015530124,0.004298758,0.00012967484,0.000294293,0.000022917227,0.000027037422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012182734,0.000030735853,0.000041176118,0.0002957618,0.00033322338,0.00008600206,0.000054637152,0.0002441487,0.000022322458],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007893648,0.00000332522,0.020702295,4.5463125e-7,0.00002000087,0.00007231948,0.0013860628,0.000087186374,5.864654e-7,0.9687445,0.007440859,0.001534502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022705637,0.000010085938,0.13474672,0.000047493402,0.000012654579,0.000013547565,0.019885575,0.000029837132,0.000002283723,0.2301565,0.6147436,0.00012466681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99268025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99996436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9347051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004927557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008112287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99699754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385212695","doi":"10.5465/amproc.2023.19703abstract","title":"Guilty Until Proven Otherwise: High Status and the Burden of Proof Under Socialism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Proceedings","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Burden of proof; Socialism; Proof of concept; Political science; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Law; Communism; Operating system; Politics","score_opus":0.03143443190279614,"score_gpt":0.3046232033164537,"score_spread":0.27318877141365755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385212695","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5969769,0.0010221939,0.00001454899,0.14836878,0.00015492187,0.0018926759,0.000015542702,0.0001581184,0.25139636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948422,0.0017771084,0.000051826188,0.00029942178,0.00023203203,0.00005900937,7.1285643e-7,0.000006177704,0.0027315225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878204,0.000019695228,0.00022916951,0.00017602053,0.00052102515,0.00027204887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962115,0.000064889966,0.00018270571,0.000026233283,0.00006800802,0.00003703263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094004435,0.00008928478,0.00019834659,0.00007459101,0.00041912132,0.000027115568,0.0002728295,0.000069512185,0.000022735281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008349104,0.000065032655,0.000049128685,0.0005172316,0.0015557212,0.00016006482,0.00027167058,0.000092856055,0.0000065920203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035169112,0.000010393658,0.00043760834,0.00007056571,0.00013063128,1.1664426e-7,0.0076066866,0.000005563582,0.000029682122,0.98014516,0.007429373,0.0040990324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010600043,0.000021188138,0.021524739,0.000096847514,0.00014135404,8.180474e-8,0.0396872,0.00001809968,0.00018830335,0.7885454,0.14857164,0.00014513309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030840281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017875402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39786533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033559292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027510298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57321197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385259658","doi":"10.4337/ccs.2023.0001","title":"The old Commonwealth model of constitutionalism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Constitutional Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Constitutionalism; Sovereignty; Law; Constitution; Political science; Constitutional theory; Commonwealth; Constitutional law; Scholarship; Popular sovereignty; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Politics; Sociology; Democracy; Geography","score_opus":0.3310488656314156,"score_gpt":0.44505130988060854,"score_spread":0.11400244424919292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385259658","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.101813726,0.027007943,0.004435891,0.03761765,0.0037445,0.0016040142,0.0005897621,0.0006644709,0.82252204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926006,0.005273227,0.000112274625,0.00023212939,0.0002035465,0.00010094286,0.000012686149,0.0000021825458,0.0014623621],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980546,0.00018222143,0.00041653556,0.00022803778,0.00071732455,0.00040125992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99693984,0.0016710232,0.00017482472,0.00013223584,0.000994071,0.00008803618],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010318866,0.0001652384,0.00038103183,0.00008584032,0.005921585,0.00003297278,0.00032253828,0.00005119307,0.000013713257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007863643,0.000117900374,0.00013054552,0.0007143557,0.028955316,0.00015580872,0.00019685889,0.0001454965,0.00016324989],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025405607,0.000026930178,0.0020575246,0.0000052225223,0.00023382172,0.0000018794761,0.0036743758,0.0030402227,0.000027656959,0.9573436,0.033441838,0.000121543955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005399104,0.000034887824,0.0035433054,0.00012329532,0.00006773128,0.0000024265173,0.030643288,0.0011028062,0.00008845562,0.58551604,0.3779894,0.0003484514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037930164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001521085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89078695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017496318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011879414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385312408","doi":"10.1515/9781553394518-010","title":"The Jurisprudence of “Canada’s Fundamental Values” and Appointment to the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.014385958855285182,"score_gpt":0.2082360322278692,"score_spread":0.19385007337258403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385312408","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015335226,0.000023552697,0.00000391803,0.003921511,0.0002557888,0.00056007004,0.0004329264,0.000009095389,0.9946398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1743267,0.00034212932,0.000018490378,0.00022992326,0.000076256656,0.0000025841678,0.0000024435008,0.000009104176,0.82499236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839926,0.000070352806,0.00019143318,0.00022544013,0.0008339327,0.00027957174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989601,0.00022177189,0.00021339947,0.00020188215,0.00025904016,0.00014383269],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021207979,0.00018190817,0.0002692642,0.000026338053,0.001983837,0.00001694643,0.0005098507,0.00008039906,0.000029805518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026595615,0.0001342122,0.00006553877,0.000013039883,0.00095890026,0.000037162623,0.00041083177,0.00015973044,6.605913e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030299614,0.0000040283567,0.000009841692,0.000010385319,0.00015451123,0.000009214462,0.00043142305,0.0000069651674,0.0000014412043,0.9624778,0.03636742,0.0004966913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000101031874,0.000030097399,0.00015761187,0.00007471649,0.000073167794,2.3678938e-7,0.001922033,8.0512973e-7,0.000040635296,0.0023054963,0.99514335,0.00015082659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9900497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8490869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9601723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006106019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016706935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99931544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385312418","doi":"10.1515/9781553394518-025","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada: A Chronology of Change","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Chronology; Supreme court; Law; Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.038366912421844986,"score_gpt":0.2205249870384467,"score_spread":0.18215807461660172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385312418","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002415438,0.000029489553,0.0000021510714,0.0011996726,0.00028694325,0.0004099182,0.00032791667,0.000021279691,0.9976985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.059117567,0.0011509219,0.000013137815,0.00008166582,0.0001665867,0.0000032082778,0.00000546023,0.00001191345,0.93944955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987803,0.00006687281,0.00019335508,0.00021204396,0.00045275746,0.00029465597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988065,0.00017879177,0.0003207501,0.00020286378,0.0004031732,0.00008793659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013402564,0.00017853612,0.00037115224,0.000054765824,0.0011133257,0.000005903899,0.00049718976,0.00022423243,0.00006943754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028452478,0.0001586934,0.00012194782,0.000012750612,0.0017448135,0.000050754537,0.00029281434,0.00019724111,0.0000025704974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025137217,0.0000049259966,0.0000074874706,0.000014656217,0.00018108175,0.000012006973,0.0003063341,4.708168e-7,0.0000011837818,0.9926065,0.0058835037,0.0009566847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014073923,0.000029726316,0.000091713824,0.00007125991,0.00009106629,1.9347632e-7,0.0004781904,4.344793e-7,0.000030172141,0.004093303,0.99481785,0.00015532595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90619195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.112915695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9889344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037159622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006399889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90327126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385312627","doi":"10.1515/9781553394518-016","title":"Reform of the Supreme Court of Canada from With in: To What Extent Should the Court Weigh in Regarding Constitutional Conventions?*","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Constitutional court; Remand (court procedure); Constitution","score_opus":0.02698722727730596,"score_gpt":0.21979074309123428,"score_spread":0.19280351581392832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385312627","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000559237,0.000035617675,0.000012457039,0.003382938,0.00037406813,0.00069864653,0.00034256748,0.000010695156,0.9945838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73508054,0.00047864515,0.000048049922,0.00039875475,0.00008802878,0.000008524715,0.00001358111,0.000012334496,0.26387155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983058,0.00008735626,0.00027970065,0.00027392793,0.0008009527,0.00025228623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998913,0.000155378,0.00026464465,0.00024457942,0.00034009843,0.00008230576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022185934,0.00020135054,0.00038418302,0.00008851293,0.0005950036,0.000016417136,0.00054294424,0.00015618929,0.00009140141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022371936,0.00014051,0.00011209679,0.000037357506,0.0020991918,0.00015770891,0.0003133092,0.00032297822,0.0000010150208],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070620365,0.000012761065,0.00017304446,0.0000091369375,0.00011697749,0.000018194418,0.00044432766,0.000050405146,0.0000014874855,0.997579,0.0014166565,0.0001073925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004474621,0.000021827647,0.00089950266,0.0010371627,0.00009259643,5.3988026e-7,0.005300011,0.000002699956,0.00004858611,0.0048918203,0.987031,0.00022681756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87841105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26513278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99268717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016715528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013033309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7734559},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385317210","doi":"10.59962/9780774867931-025","title":"The Invisible Transformation of Canada’s Constitutional Amendment Rules","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Amendment; Constitutional amendment; Transformation (genetics); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Constitution; Chemistry","score_opus":0.018925214821572434,"score_gpt":0.19127580911242686,"score_spread":0.17235059429085442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385317210","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002678829,0.0006469684,0.000019855468,0.00015460621,0.00021467898,0.0002940401,0.001549006,0.00001332478,0.99683964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14451422,0.0029054354,0.00003194294,0.000045687346,0.00006757113,0.0000017788268,0.000050065984,0.0000058791156,0.8523774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987999,0.00004141909,0.00017826601,0.00013067793,0.00069613365,0.00015355679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993506,0.00009762918,0.00020810285,0.00007679299,0.0002119808,0.00005489046],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020291975,0.000060848855,0.00019920565,0.000014935461,0.0020340567,0.00003586186,0.00030134182,0.000072515475,0.00045201092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000124738535,0.00011400385,0.00009996547,0.0000071520126,0.0030806044,0.00005687734,0.000101072415,0.00014373501,4.3146864e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012792213,0.000007387229,0.000010136203,0.000014943817,0.0001117825,0.000017569182,0.0006364442,0.000007119582,5.6995924e-7,0.9652474,0.027663946,0.0062698973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017298748,0.000016859229,0.00009256104,0.000095623465,0.00005769473,0.000002269239,0.0013242305,8.113867e-7,7.055618e-7,0.01744293,0.98068154,0.000111777124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99104184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99786717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9530176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003195693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026688797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385510020","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1423","title":"Triage and Dissensus at the Supreme Court of Canada: A Review of the Court’s 2020 Constitutional Decisions","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Dissenting opinion; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Precedent; Constitutional court; Scholarship; Constitution","score_opus":0.08471932435059226,"score_gpt":0.34456676063460734,"score_spread":0.2598474362840151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385510020","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[4.1819192e-7,0.9305422,0.0000023286211,0.013435174,0.0008723729,0.0032244339,0.0015176104,0.000014264451,0.050391227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00005645067,0.9971306,0.000011961663,0.0015203746,0.000215601,0.0003252114,0.00009678996,0.000018289269,0.0006247213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99309427,0.001771057,0.001825316,0.0005553235,0.0022410536,0.00051300327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994268,0.0028800508,0.0013745135,0.00078930205,0.0004874177,0.00020074355],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003899398,0.00051992136,0.0030650566,0.000027882696,0.0025918593,0.000022278879,0.0013162992,0.00013759872,0.0029390564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043558534,0.00029074927,0.0010895504,0.0010519234,0.0054971045,0.00007464005,0.0009162323,0.0005926391,0.0000114582235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000607779,0.000056146837,0.000010690644,0.045095358,0.0005030905,0.00001684718,0.000038494905,2.635093e-7,6.791321e-8,0.6445753,0.26028004,0.04941762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009095406,0.0000134223665,0.000007682317,0.15266901,0.002343109,0.000046998408,0.00006245288,8.406871e-8,7.464197e-8,0.00058754504,0.84391844,0.00026023266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.092078686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.373992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6439878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072833267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009220075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385511486","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1414","title":"The Right to Vote and Freedom of Expression in Political Process Cases Under the Charter","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Constitutionality; Redistricting; Political science; Charter; Supreme court; Voting; Law; Politics; Campaign finance; Section (typography); Election law; Public administration; Business","score_opus":0.038654659610531356,"score_gpt":0.3395399228910601,"score_spread":0.3008852632805288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385511486","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03720672,0.46316534,0.00007448423,0.3596136,0.0005233541,0.0013806385,0.000038163354,0.000032439904,0.13796528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98310775,0.013671723,0.000012242971,0.002962431,0.00011582676,0.00003411747,7.514564e-7,0.0000021550884,0.00009302488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909306,0.00017401208,0.00016875687,0.00011633844,0.0002544813,0.00019336226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936414,0.00029689996,0.000028898012,0.000100875295,0.00015269242,0.00005651641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004567605,0.000058387286,0.00016087721,0.0000049060955,0.000536783,0.000024912473,0.00012806758,0.000022385588,0.000029896997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027922934,0.000029271927,0.00003798518,0.00016473177,0.00065595564,0.000053254873,0.00006640254,0.00006488169,0.000005071236],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024904907,0.000016083757,0.00034558744,0.000074989395,0.000006555813,0.0000057801226,0.00023204248,2.9750706e-7,0.000024588307,0.9978785,0.0010088385,0.00040428064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009886059,0.000017957334,0.002207088,0.0028678635,0.000044316937,0.000008523334,0.0018925751,9.2888877e-7,0.00028115744,0.06179931,0.9306634,0.0001180109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002216445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029996116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94590104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021329757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013788861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9877039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385511548","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1413","title":"The Frank Dissent’s Novel Theory of the Charter: The Rhetoric and the Reality","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Dissenting opinion; Dissent; Supreme court; Law; Legislation; Political science; Rhetoric; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.04514344550061427,"score_gpt":0.31047285911309314,"score_spread":0.26532941361247886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385511548","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00058651436,0.5350015,0.00005248513,0.30687594,0.0007999488,0.00084127364,0.000027133307,0.00001718038,0.15579797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.711095,0.2830193,0.000002727085,0.0047555603,0.00027080928,0.000057180332,0.0000010311986,0.0000039479182,0.00079449074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980552,0.0009037604,0.00025748165,0.00014326282,0.00045315604,0.0001871018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981755,0.0010869879,0.00012904008,0.000373145,0.00020569593,0.000029618821],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033753954,0.00009440093,0.00023963497,0.0000019589163,0.0026769384,0.000051026098,0.00046842702,0.000028615625,0.00006150234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082102785,0.000032618394,0.00019329588,0.0002671049,0.00383263,0.00004960219,0.00018838607,0.00014974765,0.000007406874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057421444,0.000013893858,0.000102948325,0.000043557346,0.000051115534,2.400529e-7,0.0007021038,6.879299e-8,0.000004562146,0.99336445,0.0026106862,0.0031006157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011664725,0.0000026701684,0.0024716363,0.000407592,0.00012864817,0.0000023488005,0.00084132014,6.60121e-7,0.000006823677,0.08862433,0.9073442,0.000053116033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020792186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006937337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90474015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002260006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016670571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99887836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385512093","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1376","title":"Comeau and Constitutional Interpretation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Originalism; Supreme court; Constitution; Original meaning; Law; Constitutionalism; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional interpretation; Political science; Meaning (existential); Jurisprudence; Constitutional law; Doctrine; Original intent; Federalism; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Politics; Democracy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05283352769002525,"score_gpt":0.32325391950510945,"score_spread":0.2704203918150842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385512093","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00047419543,0.2707736,0.0053843427,0.16708545,0.0003982689,0.000802751,0.000037018293,0.00015903961,0.5548853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93691576,0.044166096,0.00010719766,0.018579448,0.00018944393,0.000015440126,0.0000065695067,0.0000014438339,0.000018602235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992724,0.00008332297,0.00015328248,0.0001377373,0.00023476359,0.00011849336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996447,0.00006190016,0.000040644023,0.00003671291,0.000107750006,0.00010832423],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024312755,0.00006670294,0.00017664913,0.000005546943,0.0004694652,0.000025569803,0.00008595158,0.000024512408,0.00026663198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027442988,0.00005926234,0.000046274265,0.00012029817,0.002859979,0.00014096024,0.000041326988,0.00006563691,0.00011739801],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003105176,0.0000052304563,0.00030595798,0.000097823504,0.00001395982,0.0000017680092,0.0003067624,3.1270133e-7,0.0000041731646,0.9921359,0.0039354432,0.0031895922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006748998,0.000012579148,0.00007724033,0.00052504573,0.000038342405,0.00000131053,0.00009176299,0.000008515896,0.0000016027822,0.009573665,0.9895208,0.00008167388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004079781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002791023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98558533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025782498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001272297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385512096","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1379","title":"Consultation, Cooperation and Consent in the Commons’ Court: “Manner and Form” after Mikisew Cree II","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Parliament; Constitution; Legislature; Constitutional court; Political science; Duty; Supreme court; Statute; Politics","score_opus":0.05714488711552555,"score_gpt":0.31310194961183657,"score_spread":0.255957062496311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385512096","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059859324,0.4130607,0.00011092979,0.44859314,0.0002083034,0.0026968815,0.00008044327,0.0000682542,0.07532201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9067358,0.071332365,0.00003581142,0.021653317,0.00010093048,0.00008855231,0.00000912409,0.0000031412194,0.000040988176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990009,0.00021676446,0.00023333426,0.00016053219,0.00023902116,0.00014946594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994321,0.00023143523,0.00004926944,0.000062888364,0.00015354513,0.00007075279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057767914,0.00009768628,0.0002253385,0.000008537467,0.00073605886,0.00005893961,0.00009415185,0.000034930363,0.0000790586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039528465,0.000067797555,0.000028670604,0.00018084228,0.0007822365,0.00015051455,0.00005721514,0.000096557334,0.000017470513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027216103,0.000042299387,0.0053183446,0.00038071277,0.00002851118,0.000013113917,0.011863934,4.3022888e-7,0.0000068657164,0.9555508,0.024421213,0.0023465469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027546607,0.000038139213,0.0044244975,0.00059047085,0.000066651824,0.0000042099873,0.00079671876,0.0000049050063,7.9462086e-7,0.0023801574,0.9912951,0.00012287697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021770105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026031623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9668739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019109588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010554308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99174076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385512951","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3155","title":"Introduction to Law, Authority &amp; History: A Tribute to Douglas Hay","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Tribute; Hay; Law; Political science; Legal history; Sociology","score_opus":0.06072710639601393,"score_gpt":0.32450558645900596,"score_spread":0.26377848006299204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385512951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016254386,0.00034602676,0.0014067125,0.1874957,0.007897842,0.00018785843,0.000011894501,0.00005437814,0.80097413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9749924,0.000078552504,0.0013524598,0.0012501978,0.014499471,0.000013148684,0.0000014796136,0.000007893145,0.007804375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984123,0.00013291302,0.00022436379,0.00024878938,0.0005623421,0.00041925217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879414,0.00002985645,0.00016387244,0.00025604403,0.00032310284,0.00043297897],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012583759,0.0001265575,0.00022138862,0.000041088417,0.0071382034,0.00038493183,0.0005147902,0.00008350636,0.0005086582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00062464573,0.00011781222,0.00011395314,0.00006516716,0.00059742166,0.0004909791,0.0001412545,0.00029381367,0.00063436624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004454395,0.000038023165,0.00018405844,0.0000010225311,0.000028448376,0.000008871316,0.0014285316,0.0000108799795,0.00009217163,0.8491213,0.14772636,0.0013158228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015789496,0.000041614443,0.0009765947,0.000019430809,0.00002307185,0.000014217173,0.00020042752,2.9930166e-7,0.000019355419,0.093718395,0.904681,0.00014764874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28789675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7437822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.973367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007938651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021149711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9941544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385518153","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2991","title":"Introduction","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Constitutional law; Theme (computing); Law; Political science; Diversity (politics); Field (mathematics); Aside; Work (physics); Sociology; Comparative law; Engineering","score_opus":0.020596455352911578,"score_gpt":0.2728643914709323,"score_spread":0.2522679361180207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385518153","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010367928,0.00028388164,0.0011375847,0.06122711,0.0012951427,0.000032044667,0.0000016089799,0.0000328925,0.9349529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99088377,0.00051618565,0.00015270659,0.0002075205,0.0066349856,0.0000016206055,1.2879501e-7,0.0000026374782,0.0016004298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924433,0.00007676668,0.00011253921,0.00008594067,0.00028055374,0.00019989065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996421,0.000039362167,0.00005497708,0.000043418597,0.00012526837,0.00009490002],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043224893,0.000047976908,0.00007042574,0.000018391016,0.0016841637,0.000054293763,0.00010773161,0.000034849043,0.001090484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013069533,0.000029699759,0.000052004678,0.00006477007,0.000461783,0.00026726606,0.000018367266,0.0000761084,0.00031881334],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073168517,0.000013804905,0.00035961336,1.9981536e-7,0.00001433328,0.0000048752795,0.0001755451,4.2704227e-7,0.00025763176,0.9773778,0.0074429265,0.014345563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011779441,0.000013891847,0.00042770823,0.000010788926,0.0000067640717,0.00001926093,0.00029363664,5.5366346e-8,0.00008008629,0.43921003,0.5597676,0.00005239912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020155014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.104882665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.989847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000101561076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007213051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385518171","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1255","title":"Charter Litigation, Social and Economic Rights &amp; Civil Procedure","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Charter; Appeal; Political science; Law; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Human rights","score_opus":0.04032466827155654,"score_gpt":0.34451172540794245,"score_spread":0.3041870571363859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385518171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73249865,0.00014784896,0.000003760851,0.062101707,0.00027422767,0.00006904405,0.00001584027,0.000008053298,0.20488086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898667,0.00012966034,0.000010879708,0.0008042414,0.008802143,0.0000012598898,4.3253544e-7,0.0000028088125,0.00038187997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993658,0.00004423769,0.00018607384,0.000075594464,0.00015922157,0.00016908039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947506,0.000020719805,0.00028868596,0.000028572704,0.000109301676,0.00007765944],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030046006,0.00007185018,0.00019355104,0.000033399596,0.0056706406,0.00024092599,0.00012229157,0.0000876068,0.000021936747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048795107,0.000060973085,0.000069826885,0.00001551436,0.0014737158,0.00038436268,0.000039251296,0.00010765987,0.0000063882926],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011619878,0.000011329908,0.0011956192,0.0000042832753,0.000038060985,0.0000013419202,0.020277146,2.042076e-8,0.000010933791,0.9755323,0.002337994,0.0005793306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044477682,0.000023339206,0.06259545,0.000017006361,0.000034394776,0.000007696389,0.0010473686,2.318721e-7,0.0000056038043,0.49047494,0.44522536,0.00012384354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021699322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040797826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48505738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007303155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032586808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385518207","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1341","title":"The Process of Electoral Reform in Canada: Democratic and Constitutional Constraints","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Referendum; Democratic legitimacy; Electoral reform; Democracy; Legitimacy; Political science; Process (computing); Normative; Law and economics; Constitutional amendment; Public administration; Law; Constitution; Economics; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.023882534930232638,"score_gpt":0.29163259855129775,"score_spread":0.2677500636210651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385518207","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040986154,0.4179575,0.0003214489,0.112300634,0.0009435575,0.0026193827,0.00017277777,0.000050629526,0.4246479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97252184,0.026899545,0.000006449417,0.0004827803,0.000032977783,0.000022160704,5.597782e-7,0.0000011710728,0.0000325418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906635,0.00007420918,0.00024814106,0.00010274158,0.00031261056,0.00019595791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994856,0.00016923106,0.00007532621,0.000057246067,0.00016042436,0.000052189374],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051616726,0.000066186025,0.00019435864,0.000006715342,0.00040452273,0.0000063592192,0.00012654904,0.000018059345,0.00006221275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027918283,0.00003438153,0.000024385496,0.00012462358,0.0073545724,0.00008380609,0.000021432492,0.0000452947,0.0000027370768],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026550715,0.000004744576,0.007326817,0.00006796599,0.0000111781355,0.0000018797703,0.000021273261,3.34966e-8,0.0000051515185,0.98645246,0.0003145784,0.0057912413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009347153,0.000054854543,0.01573487,0.013094133,0.00012979755,0.00002579823,0.0013314995,0.0000020451657,0.00010135239,0.21793301,0.7500788,0.00057913153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.53857046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9663934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93153566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038353025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032262437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99534684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385518455","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1259","title":"Taking Dialogue Theory Much too Seriously (or Perhaps Charter Dialogue Isn't Such a Good Thing after all)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Appeal; Legislature; Law; Law and economics; Judicial review; Political science; Wright; Sociology; Position (finance); Economics; History","score_opus":0.031058146041421306,"score_gpt":0.2993359278279379,"score_spread":0.26827778178651657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385518455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038024552,0.0018225678,0.0030296687,0.0040094205,0.0021880525,0.0003189502,0.000027702086,0.00013516528,0.9504439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99130315,0.00037825888,0.00043438654,0.0036206637,0.0033002796,0.000017444812,0.0000053126428,0.000024015524,0.0009165091],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99682343,0.0003745881,0.0005480868,0.00034286035,0.000877363,0.0010336553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848926,0.00042394936,0.00031000873,0.00016105048,0.00024472998,0.0003709808],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035928714,0.0002847077,0.0003785611,0.00009670049,0.0026802362,0.0004189729,0.00046871268,0.00022089049,0.0014017195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000338368,0.00022170872,0.0002644293,0.0002312106,0.0008275515,0.0006781391,0.00013373449,0.00068712886,0.00014820055],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002994033,0.000112452995,0.0031676886,0.000006724012,0.00017025774,0.0006215859,0.022046499,0.0000032535115,0.00014918143,0.9658623,0.0003353164,0.007225342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022015034,0.00038953117,0.02926342,0.00045423984,0.00037306777,0.00079554063,0.032546073,0.000009659385,0.00021242785,0.69265246,0.23944981,0.001652237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05344511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5079287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9532786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027242955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026934783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385518626","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1244","title":"Does a Judge's Party of Appointment or Gender Matter to Case outcomes?: An Empirical Study of the Court of Appeal for Ontario","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Ideology; Law; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.08521536181734822,"score_gpt":0.3781677294555517,"score_spread":0.2929523676382035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385518626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9678865,0.0000149994,0.00045338678,0.0016462957,0.00041349066,0.0005886085,0.000021718719,0.0000042861743,0.028970731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99878496,0.0000017955579,0.00045249055,0.0004350958,0.00013574747,0.000009640984,2.6724064e-7,0.0000047472017,0.00017525753],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984292,0.000117097065,0.0005075972,0.00013246703,0.0005518236,0.000261836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905926,0.00013848941,0.0002561007,0.00013085653,0.00027629113,0.00013901133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012337966,0.000103736595,0.00031232115,0.00003387891,0.00073028397,0.000018826908,0.0002380214,0.0000487829,0.00019347343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049325456,0.00004798636,0.00014721624,0.00010769128,0.0003207961,0.000085696985,0.000075128955,0.0001327021,0.00000191099],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004070752,0.0016280302,0.89922994,0.000013805047,0.00028743257,0.00008118229,0.042221162,0.00003600795,0.000035533587,0.054928232,0.0006924179,0.00043917118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029778846,0.001485674,0.82222843,0.0000829316,0.00042035404,0.00018627541,0.110830724,0.000002453291,0.00036146137,0.048641045,0.01242777,0.00035502564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35106108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9740767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62301564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013922426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002597849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6532603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385589511","doi":"10.59962/9780774868280-008","title":"6 The Appeals Begin in Nova Scotia’s Supreme Court","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Supreme court; Nova (rocket); Law; Political science; Art; History; Humanities; Archaeology; Engineering; Aeronautics","score_opus":0.028962897388912636,"score_gpt":0.21742272643491387,"score_spread":0.18845982904600123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385589511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00055132934,0.001251335,0.0000031631728,0.00022107517,0.0003678637,0.00045552198,0.00036364156,0.000037632984,0.99674845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.052857332,0.0018846913,0.000021137468,0.00004931396,0.00011736797,7.005193e-7,0.000012366762,0.000012484498,0.9450446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985164,0.00008673939,0.00018641732,0.00029124477,0.00063498365,0.0002842574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926716,0.00015275051,0.00019054429,0.00015772015,0.0001607802,0.00007105042],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042613834,0.0000940456,0.0003120243,0.00003171767,0.0012628478,0.000111329224,0.0006435261,0.00016082247,0.00096627075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030535124,0.0001904693,0.00015771117,0.000017159307,0.0022442415,0.00006771585,0.00042531022,0.00034887003,0.0000100521875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005211268,0.0000496334,0.0009917706,0.000034250683,0.0002801314,0.0005278388,0.0029761682,0.0000075897783,0.0000013690303,0.73647404,0.22039823,0.038206857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002595756,0.000022349468,0.0010101245,0.00017622857,0.00004858324,0.0000033295241,0.0011034915,7.4762085e-7,6.368156e-8,0.016167108,0.9810074,0.00020102398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9368731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98853415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76060915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024535053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043935113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385590588","doi":"10.59962/9780774865982-008","title":"Where Are the Women? Analyzing the Three Métis Supreme Court of Canada Decisions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Supreme Court Decisions","score_opus":0.023628173077533014,"score_gpt":0.2002085696064912,"score_spread":0.17658039652895818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385590588","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0045733443,0.0045479503,0.0000337311,0.0005313581,0.0002643985,0.00035265766,0.0009833681,0.000016959202,0.9886962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23297063,0.0040948396,0.000026117781,0.00007240345,0.00014689981,0.0000015067318,0.0000060004636,0.0000127741005,0.76266885],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850726,0.00007195425,0.0001902622,0.00023971053,0.00070898054,0.00028185864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984031,0.0003681313,0.00031348498,0.00024312602,0.00058444066,0.00008776916],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030802324,0.00009601016,0.00037651538,0.000014161432,0.0020002334,0.00008836298,0.000718964,0.00013887654,0.00047120958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000075467695,0.00013664966,0.00016625255,0.00002533733,0.0018691141,0.000039705697,0.00040251814,0.00025962933,5.5225627e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005056306,0.00005878267,0.0046413145,0.000097586824,0.0022662235,0.00085386995,0.007477619,0.00003581809,0.00000308835,0.33064488,0.5842993,0.06957093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001663514,0.000012668052,0.0047436794,0.0008097247,0.00016001768,0.000004441367,0.0107658375,0.0000016704599,2.1017283e-7,0.010849999,0.97229296,0.00019245692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9916841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99985516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38799363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027344868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016423339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99929905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385591222","doi":"10.59962/9780774864985-005","title":"Party Discipline in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.022104964443234364,"score_gpt":0.19174002446403896,"score_spread":0.16963506002080458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385591222","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00079555996,0.0003380043,0.0000028329432,0.00013365489,0.00014817924,0.00021374864,0.00062579894,0.000018980963,0.9977232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2231345,0.0005344066,0.000024125398,0.00007201876,0.00011063407,3.369673e-7,0.000015059016,0.000007989499,0.77610093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990453,0.000025386229,0.00013521401,0.00023672612,0.00038803567,0.00016932389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955386,0.000044892484,0.000116963856,0.00007275145,0.000101902035,0.00010961879],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000061618186,0.00006955047,0.00030730385,0.000012002011,0.0003397196,0.00003168374,0.00028588876,0.00010590063,0.0002730765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015130376,0.0001676769,0.000074505624,0.000009577118,0.0006818179,0.000036670997,0.00020581497,0.00019108264,0.0000024909987],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007752836,0.00004688102,0.0044706594,0.00014303524,0.00044354945,0.004077973,0.0046424195,0.000014932163,0.0000016363704,0.49152187,0.41051817,0.08404134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022972963,0.000010403288,0.0021139984,0.00025339835,0.00004282693,0.000001082805,0.00095148914,0.0000018567449,8.768312e-8,0.0114408275,0.9847465,0.00020780742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99985373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5742283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039785635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020801951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6837666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385591295","doi":"10.59962/9780774864589-009","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.018875445070853997,"score_gpt":0.1831155589760494,"score_spread":0.16424011390519538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385591295","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013023267,0.00069525617,0.0000035136886,0.00023576357,0.00019287642,0.00020340446,0.00054625387,0.00001573866,0.99797696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.075490534,0.00089462806,0.000014691433,0.00004267703,0.00009691135,1.9139635e-7,0.000004182599,0.0000063861735,0.9234498],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998985,0.00002962744,0.00013431814,0.00016103216,0.0005357826,0.00015422887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992068,0.00011344689,0.00019210903,0.00009456993,0.00030615638,0.0000869083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010699111,0.00006064718,0.000251655,0.000005668898,0.0009817982,0.000037176305,0.0004293785,0.00010556264,0.000109521985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033717464,0.000116567855,0.000103880324,0.000006629131,0.0017467067,0.000023040002,0.00017427416,0.00014407405,7.59405e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024800858,0.000007247199,0.00007780019,0.000033555392,0.00032869112,0.0001624345,0.00087502203,0.0000011150088,0.0000013000582,0.46582603,0.51867235,0.013989666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011321466,0.000014378098,0.00026665657,0.0001359467,0.00006656492,0.0000010080682,0.0007584386,6.3578983e-7,4.3556943e-7,0.011079177,0.98744786,0.00011569467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9976151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99972504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4687755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011820606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015932381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7551297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385591994","doi":"10.59962/9780774880541-026","title":"On Obstruction, Denial, and Canada’s Failure to Uphold the Rule of Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Denial; Rule of law; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.012882174686275161,"score_gpt":0.18087735491884382,"score_spread":0.16799518023256865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385591994","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009478532,0.00014205666,0.000001684269,0.00021260494,0.00020752069,0.0003226236,0.00055497064,0.000010801714,0.9890692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2920118,0.00013311196,0.00003091142,0.00019925678,0.00007735579,2.8932112e-7,0.0000041369826,0.0000072963535,0.70753586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918556,0.000021707274,0.00010074285,0.00018644251,0.0003842877,0.00012126646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994119,0.000079698104,0.00012032158,0.000109167704,0.00021368272,0.00006522166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000069865484,0.00006535365,0.0002292649,0.000011999947,0.0006183907,0.000040584473,0.0002443212,0.0001183598,0.000097923985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014209078,0.00011422843,0.000057310797,0.000005056901,0.0010736628,0.000028558497,0.00013700771,0.00012363867,0.0000014055477],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021991895,0.0000066281764,0.00008200901,0.000027478449,0.00014098265,0.00003169387,0.001557359,0.00000387155,0.000002866829,0.8937723,0.10052038,0.0038324425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014810535,0.000026208827,0.00064214715,0.00022070741,0.00006330984,0.0000027038732,0.0007449065,1.0078419e-7,0.0000011943298,0.009685569,0.9883337,0.0001313504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9985916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8878133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009889902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061631674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4756224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385594028","doi":"10.59962/9780774836340-030","title":"26 Early Days on the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.030277000551344142,"score_gpt":0.1938477171451442,"score_spread":0.16357071659380007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385594028","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023616843,0.00038807045,0.0000036007316,0.0004163752,0.00055848295,0.00039120493,0.0013528754,0.00001664504,0.97325593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56459975,0.00037527503,0.00001003279,0.000045434404,0.00009761673,3.2300224e-7,0.0000020750688,0.000008786122,0.4348607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822605,0.00008944324,0.00021411253,0.0003171097,0.00084228226,0.00031100903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983378,0.00024472165,0.0005056741,0.0003124997,0.00047522466,0.00012406941],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024646774,0.0001415573,0.00048123038,0.000014137274,0.0022943008,0.00007992291,0.0009818164,0.00022056059,0.00052820664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060489347,0.0002569041,0.00021182114,0.000007277216,0.0059649106,0.00007063285,0.00031506253,0.0002986456,0.00000541128],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004859563,0.000048521408,0.0010714169,0.00006165232,0.0006472435,0.0003285831,0.0014560198,0.000005411183,0.000004654187,0.89197206,0.08678341,0.017572423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003161169,0.00009756134,0.015123914,0.0011285214,0.00022606876,0.000004473553,0.000776082,0.0000028410834,0.000003275338,0.01295127,0.9690441,0.0003257603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9992903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99945474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8822607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021199117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001256407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385594052","doi":"10.59962/9780774836340-029","title":"25 Appointment to the Supreme Court of Canada, 1987","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02250871694757528,"score_gpt":0.20121282161483145,"score_spread":0.17870410466725617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385594052","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033746607,0.00031826043,0.0000097531765,0.0003606467,0.0002618906,0.00045171758,0.0009801248,0.000012688299,0.9972674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08644098,0.00024384916,0.000026711357,0.000063979925,0.0001165159,6.2751695e-7,0.000004706517,0.0000061661403,0.9130965],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987904,0.000029915613,0.00013857242,0.00021367997,0.0006250161,0.00020244264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990098,0.000054169064,0.00024311471,0.00022848975,0.00035462505,0.00010983085],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019418151,0.00008049072,0.0003146046,0.00001392405,0.0013231187,0.000056677978,0.0007133804,0.000116788586,0.00021083023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033143893,0.00014506222,0.00011811123,0.0000037806988,0.0012710858,0.000031296593,0.0003077778,0.00012982741,0.0000023961356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025669346,0.000021659192,0.00010884202,0.00003989484,0.00040798218,0.00016062665,0.0023933144,0.0000043975033,0.0000013886411,0.19288264,0.77484876,0.029104799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001407727,0.000024801684,0.001166442,0.00029318727,0.000090158595,0.0000015846243,0.00052877044,3.308966e-7,6.175726e-7,0.004442088,0.99316067,0.0001505539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99838483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2183119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019414393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013483036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385598665","doi":"10.59962/9780774861731-004","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada Takes to the Constitutional Stage","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Stage (stratigraphy); Law; Political science; Geology; Paleontology","score_opus":0.019637432230787528,"score_gpt":0.19409578764796667,"score_spread":0.17445835541717913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385598665","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027582137,0.00057151925,0.000027432092,0.00041834862,0.00043634186,0.00050660217,0.0020014269,0.000012226585,0.9957503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.068719044,0.00026966538,0.000015498852,0.0000829212,0.00009236279,4.9861563e-7,0.000006125422,0.000004329089,0.93080956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986433,0.000045641886,0.00016150894,0.0001924139,0.0007436625,0.0002135212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883395,0.00023822242,0.00019691625,0.00017088429,0.00048066594,0.00007936071],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026212286,0.00007932057,0.0002499665,0.000010685495,0.0015845954,0.00006435599,0.0006262616,0.000105722014,0.00021182907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052439726,0.000113496775,0.00010988426,0.000010746486,0.003983429,0.00003202017,0.00016626714,0.00016314173,0.0000031460297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016778016,0.000005181698,0.00009179196,0.000012822847,0.00016284993,0.000027169594,0.0004778155,0.000017080078,7.0818754e-7,0.7680133,0.22864747,0.002527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012470342,0.00001569689,0.0005435569,0.00016126984,0.0000527574,0.000001639455,0.0015040503,8.5931066e-7,4.4851888e-7,0.0019827234,0.9954825,0.0001298109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99147004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99943954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76683503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017979078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035651445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385598905","doi":"10.59962/9780774861731-002","title":"Preface","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.023407642503380788,"score_gpt":0.2026470071553356,"score_spread":0.1792393646519548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385598905","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026980255,0.00065295334,0.000010627982,0.000022548229,0.00034600805,0.00034871488,0.00037688206,0.0000610156,0.99791145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010636222,0.0009531019,0.000045235225,0.000026259322,0.00015761137,1.4247178e-7,0.0000072686653,0.000009381868,0.9881648],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998997,0.000026944257,0.00011034834,0.0002648446,0.00041463922,0.00018626053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933594,0.000052466483,0.00016212088,0.00013352766,0.00023820486,0.00007772088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000107123844,0.000078011835,0.00030521545,0.000018199182,0.00052431575,0.00007001962,0.00036101436,0.00027767758,0.0006919897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012488959,0.00019863238,0.00016416627,0.0000052662153,0.0013527649,0.000059532566,0.00020590995,0.00018832901,0.00003158519],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025853238,0.000030020325,0.00018477891,0.0000789327,0.00039666833,0.00020066704,0.002092246,0.000002143813,0.0000027261424,0.65012515,0.29857683,0.04828397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019416859,0.000021359778,0.000279971,0.00030606138,0.00008689726,0.000001878956,0.0003007938,2.7616775e-7,1.2648673e-7,0.009580835,0.9890217,0.00020589722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.728843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7884988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6904449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000097622484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004361444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80999935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385600200","doi":"10.59962/9780774834506-013","title":"Institutional Change, Permanent Campaigning, and Canada’s Fixed Election Date Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03066153552095733,"score_gpt":0.20980775286813222,"score_spread":0.1791462173471749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385600200","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00088448386,0.00055200275,0.0000034521165,0.00006855845,0.00030904426,0.00029917463,0.00062537345,0.00002872074,0.9972292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21607535,0.0013553833,0.000021807378,0.000100714904,0.00028192904,0.000001156258,0.000040694587,0.0000078027115,0.78211516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990026,0.000025422114,0.00010255347,0.00026584827,0.00041755397,0.00018604918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993415,0.00002292026,0.00019468971,0.00010846626,0.0002225426,0.00010988231],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010343663,0.0000907357,0.00025116635,0.000016480855,0.0026294237,0.000117679025,0.00024257995,0.00017168152,0.00009246384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012674102,0.00020115288,0.00006134635,0.0000021740325,0.002055087,0.0001220418,0.00018129806,0.00017101587,0.000001000684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030282723,0.000021909105,0.00035784976,0.00007594736,0.0003320695,0.00056623126,0.0018545893,6.744441e-7,0.0000030976219,0.8955363,0.0721503,0.029070767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021261127,0.000016402453,0.0012862337,0.00030994837,0.00008993471,0.00001170241,0.00015521201,7.3162687e-7,5.890289e-7,0.0032978705,0.99440545,0.00021329714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.999609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99994135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92225516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018185623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009484022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385721839","doi":"10.59962/9780774816762-002","title":"Should We Cheer? Contested Constitutionalism and the <i>Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Charter; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Democracy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.023574284482760357,"score_gpt":0.19835855168899436,"score_spread":0.174784267206234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385721839","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013428034,0.0016543112,0.000004263218,0.00040013526,0.00016804315,0.00046528393,0.00086707785,0.00001777874,0.9950803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59495175,0.0012702353,0.00005758368,0.00015407837,0.00014923717,0.0000011999622,0.000012926962,0.0000078945895,0.4033951],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909383,0.00004230533,0.00015075026,0.00022200735,0.00032541392,0.0001657158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909383,0.00014421696,0.0001725649,0.00010418763,0.00033443235,0.00015074176],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022917952,0.0000953818,0.00037493763,0.0000335191,0.0013553562,0.00008757067,0.0002260072,0.00033286025,0.00013777828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023148137,0.00014586336,0.00009280059,0.000008019016,0.015549621,0.000059384078,0.0001154291,0.0002887459,9.822762e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025924055,0.000005745516,0.00007170793,0.000018159097,0.0001552254,0.000045531586,0.0015582273,3.612106e-8,0.0000030407484,0.991481,0.0050448044,0.0015905822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009602553,0.000013570594,0.00040199643,0.00030894254,0.00016886405,0.000015494517,0.00019159442,8.113986e-7,0.0000012207015,0.11779219,0.8799714,0.00017367495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98236823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99748117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87492657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003322399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042943485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385736645","doi":"10.59962/9780774818896-015","title":"Use of the Canadian Judicial Institution","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05241980198203445,"score_gpt":0.19611476797619842,"score_spread":0.14369496599416398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385736645","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010655674,0.00014213355,0.00000374677,0.00002666618,0.00036639482,0.0003180833,0.0006380794,0.000016993507,0.99742234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.352981,0.00032667615,0.000024863562,0.00004212072,0.000091921705,2.3683664e-7,0.000004359373,0.000006126862,0.6465227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910367,0.00003990717,0.00013646117,0.0001764416,0.00036583625,0.00017770604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991536,0.000026794762,0.00021215506,0.00013709666,0.00036233955,0.0001079955],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000103171296,0.00006984828,0.00023783193,0.000032550743,0.0013051975,0.00005034307,0.0003774431,0.00027995324,0.0002348422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036785266,0.00013359204,0.00017163757,0.0000126658215,0.0036250306,0.000084488514,0.00014782917,0.00018264017,0.0000032277856],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013195818,0.0000143327925,0.0006544143,0.00001830491,0.0001746029,0.00006070977,0.0018347758,0.0000012682776,9.258264e-7,0.94361115,0.032539748,0.021076553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000102119244,0.000012775316,0.0044881264,0.00033445546,0.00012567574,0.0000019670238,0.00008563788,1.8278061e-7,6.8465914e-7,0.021252252,0.97345006,0.00014606676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9992189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99985176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9409103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021707146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015867698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385744360","doi":"10.59962/9780774823524","title":"Governing from the Bench","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.023564436634583023,"score_gpt":0.2005969415269002,"score_spread":0.17703250489231717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385744360","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007584818,0.0026587702,0.0000148158015,0.000045313656,0.00030678802,0.00023746389,0.0013318801,0.000044351542,0.99460214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014789982,0.00075356045,0.00004367226,0.000073603274,0.0006080731,4.5527472e-7,0.000038070168,0.000007847487,0.9836847],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998834,0.000105253595,0.000108462125,0.0002041877,0.0005094542,0.00023861272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919206,0.0002371865,0.00019317416,0.00013602652,0.0001606573,0.00008089076],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019873933,0.00007400628,0.00024959078,0.0000063673465,0.0013158426,0.00010662791,0.00055471645,0.00022129288,0.00056602026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036899644,0.00014266474,0.00015348272,0.000011241159,0.0017686455,0.00007727256,0.00029041208,0.0002513633,0.000021015063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007512578,0.000020791153,0.0009724873,0.0000103993925,0.00024975697,0.00004457739,0.005187241,3.4992968e-7,6.243616e-7,0.020761013,0.93900484,0.033740386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013686507,0.000006756219,0.003944623,0.0002190457,0.0001611207,8.3422515e-7,0.0012955759,2.2944232e-7,6.197996e-8,0.0061857896,0.9878891,0.00016000666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95890987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93848276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04888423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018142222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054740807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385747202","doi":"10.59962/9780774816762-006","title":"Legislative Activism and Parliamentary Bills of Rights: Institutional Lessons for Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Law and economics; Public administration; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.02378121751425255,"score_gpt":0.21455182783542756,"score_spread":0.190770610321175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385747202","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033372866,0.0003385403,0.000053667187,0.00012450041,0.0002712993,0.0005160447,0.004091644,0.000013940245,0.9912531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4871785,0.00055696233,0.00049882283,0.0000519584,0.0001915231,0.0000023520636,0.000051194413,0.000010629301,0.51145804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913305,0.000018236995,0.00013200153,0.00023101787,0.0003363667,0.00014935301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991971,0.00013716846,0.00021547661,0.00007303323,0.00029499573,0.00008220238],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000908298,0.00008386845,0.00031818918,0.000021779588,0.00096298876,0.000026933008,0.00018736234,0.00018744996,0.0000830813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001615953,0.0001643017,0.00008788085,0.0000060767497,0.0028267554,0.00007837788,0.00011191962,0.00016721882,1.2639222e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007685503,0.00005287846,0.00016371418,0.00009284616,0.0007999739,0.00010906728,0.0027407242,0.00000137963,0.00002901284,0.9261781,0.03503942,0.034716014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038252663,0.00002748326,0.0006381006,0.00028678827,0.0001287728,0.0000028675165,0.0003982174,5.9697993e-7,0.000006260693,0.045319755,0.9526178,0.00019079402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9985179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99969566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9175784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013223103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013238289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385853593","doi":"10.59962/9780774855846-003","title":"1 Models of Judicial Behaviour and the Canadian Supreme Court","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Certiorari; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.029360147251386366,"score_gpt":0.19529045078324753,"score_spread":0.16593030353186117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385853593","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014219765,0.0010583858,0.000005919882,0.0000947587,0.00010407448,0.00037104147,0.00069466507,0.000015103375,0.99623406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59064126,0.0025898665,0.000030079535,0.000038364356,0.00008426857,4.5391573e-7,0.0000067991487,0.000007743785,0.40660113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990094,0.00004514748,0.0001475762,0.00019382617,0.00041432848,0.00018976422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991967,0.000060375623,0.00016770535,0.00010084897,0.00034494582,0.00012942156],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018019576,0.0000784139,0.00036316246,0.000032113767,0.0013767934,0.00004404446,0.0003051254,0.00023574253,0.00007914345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013573393,0.00014477171,0.00013448877,0.00000792782,0.0061810985,0.000056559962,0.00012529138,0.00018403635,7.6473805e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000101595084,0.000028740016,0.0007770755,0.000036761077,0.0005146806,0.00038825476,0.013956073,0.000009272126,3.338557e-7,0.8160497,0.15285245,0.015285047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018242423,0.000053322456,0.0031733513,0.0005323544,0.00059005,0.000028854418,0.0016704067,0.000021966252,2.7197052e-7,0.09668834,0.89488196,0.0005348621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9982863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99926585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74202955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000102486905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009969374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385853641","doi":"10.59962/9780774856188-006","title":"Canada’s Contribution to the Comparative Study of Rights and Judicial Review","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.025690004561096512,"score_gpt":0.23054235144931717,"score_spread":0.20485234688822065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385853641","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036171156,0.0051926044,0.0000025961835,0.00020129315,0.00010504684,0.0015787157,0.00054560887,0.000011690965,0.98874533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71564686,0.002062992,0.0000069005227,0.000224374,0.00011306435,0.0000011492594,0.000009209358,0.0000035045628,0.28193194],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989615,0.0000841844,0.00017059478,0.00019239039,0.00046651287,0.00012478983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999086,0.00006524478,0.00020897889,0.00009152243,0.0004752135,0.00007298865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017745048,0.000073840296,0.00046076544,0.000012199604,0.0008209358,0.00002230526,0.000236857,0.00006819375,0.000042180185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000175182,0.000118745826,0.000052169824,0.000012182811,0.0006129964,0.000026452257,0.000107411295,0.00011964663,5.076206e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008714778,0.00014968136,0.00010287919,0.0001069267,0.00076025334,0.00021422507,0.008018365,0.0000026800299,5.7117234e-7,0.19678222,0.7649463,0.028828744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027018387,0.00011319738,0.0018825638,0.0011656502,0.0002621307,0.0000015404534,0.00061871466,1.4245241e-7,1.2466242e-7,0.004399254,0.9911497,0.00013679528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9984891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99987376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71202976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001155567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005848502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6314058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385855399","doi":"10.59962/9780774817349-001","title":"Preface","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.02162949007285553,"score_gpt":0.2032965924537921,"score_spread":0.18166710238093658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385855399","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00042675197,0.00037600694,0.000012440099,0.000028472778,0.00038844233,0.00027020028,0.00035290778,0.00007259716,0.9980722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009800553,0.0007287351,0.00014483237,0.000023702385,0.00025561155,2.475469e-7,0.0000066398748,0.00000957614,0.9890301],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990231,0.000022240709,0.000111257075,0.00025514333,0.0004001405,0.00018814598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928916,0.00004765381,0.00016027757,0.00013151986,0.0002678869,0.000103522114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011991796,0.00007889425,0.00027662053,0.00001828477,0.0008705157,0.00007869603,0.00038474376,0.00040072657,0.0008452332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019072848,0.00020045451,0.0001567784,0.0000051215566,0.002342201,0.000055666504,0.00019849153,0.00033872525,0.000012961405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035671834,0.000059411173,0.00016065754,0.0000771951,0.00050203194,0.00048136496,0.0040614395,5.788168e-7,0.000032978736,0.723186,0.1715947,0.09980796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015895834,0.00001525084,0.00021087573,0.00017965445,0.00008380725,0.0000027906153,0.00020107283,9.246716e-8,6.264978e-7,0.021304294,0.9776425,0.00020012411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.771377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9221226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80604774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059297305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030762624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9254711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385860693","doi":"10.59962/9780774855150-003","title":"Canada’s Courts in Context","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02699150591391886,"score_gpt":0.20626380431073915,"score_spread":0.1792722983968203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385860693","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006268638,0.0007582352,0.000004134404,0.00004475688,0.00020514807,0.00025000167,0.00041974595,0.000019489822,0.9976716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14514746,0.0004505531,0.00001417893,0.000111112204,0.00007736811,1.4264299e-7,0.0000063181974,0.000006722405,0.8541862],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887615,0.000024103389,0.00015339446,0.00022420495,0.00048827284,0.00023384344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993805,0.00007343506,0.00014115128,0.000084141604,0.00022112344,0.00009959983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017113592,0.00007668718,0.00031213346,0.00002867868,0.00040411527,0.00003395605,0.00027696503,0.00021322866,0.00031911302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018127756,0.00019760468,0.00007901728,0.000006493282,0.0011265883,0.00003726852,0.000112604874,0.00020684408,0.0000020477923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003843549,0.000030678777,0.0005943203,0.00004021225,0.00019720182,0.002512367,0.0021181074,0.0000014588625,3.5512576e-7,0.53650206,0.3297018,0.12826298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025537863,0.000009739627,0.0013472831,0.0003217279,0.000032984084,0.0000026570572,0.00079150277,2.407048e-7,1.01341314e-7,0.0055678296,0.9914748,0.00019575066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9998784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.661773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004049421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022200192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8058085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385860923","doi":"10.59962/9780774855150-007","title":"Responsiveness of Judicial Decisions to Canadian Democracy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.04197681545091582,"score_gpt":0.2443179095851862,"score_spread":0.20234109413427037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385860923","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026096154,0.00024589017,0.000058640107,0.00010328479,0.00027337682,0.00045474636,0.001035547,0.000024459194,0.99519444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.123561844,0.00054052187,0.00037016068,0.00018222592,0.00020506937,4.4442618e-7,0.000013684059,0.000018710041,0.87510735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985045,0.00004888924,0.00023642792,0.0003009508,0.00058128603,0.00032794118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99811345,0.0002460169,0.00018564357,0.00016619296,0.0009036329,0.00038508663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003422954,0.00010111657,0.0004350836,0.00015346345,0.0011032753,0.000042096188,0.0005095367,0.00033093992,0.00038069123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020002501,0.00024353506,0.00018762931,0.000033245306,0.0014619732,0.000050744187,0.0001934602,0.00018767871,0.000011951952],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025075243,0.000048436606,0.00037043862,0.0000328006,0.0004574706,0.0013951939,0.004456615,0.000008221702,0.000011139208,0.6091808,0.1489128,0.23487535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019206127,0.00004832598,0.002792812,0.0006459129,0.000107126274,0.000003283646,0.0005872351,1.5292751e-7,0.0000010312167,0.028383365,0.9669881,0.0002506222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99503356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9993595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81807524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000310066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002013539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99310714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385868921","doi":"10.59962/9780774817882-004","title":"Systemism and Canadian Constitutional Politics","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.026377884595376638,"score_gpt":0.18931155054678867,"score_spread":0.16293366595141204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385868921","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023594305,0.0009130889,0.000012983387,0.000019003264,0.00016169233,0.00022730565,0.0014020328,0.00002903036,0.9969989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12712571,0.00078143884,0.000034674656,0.00004064882,0.00010843572,2.5693518e-7,0.000012264515,0.000004983212,0.8718916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991676,0.000024125056,0.00011549295,0.00021411451,0.00024969954,0.00022893805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992348,0.00003301257,0.00010417835,0.00007803486,0.0002774058,0.0002725878],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001026344,0.00007741125,0.00025384684,0.000036767386,0.0011119565,0.00006165066,0.00019509354,0.0002681648,0.00034499573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015472888,0.00018742206,0.000077473545,0.000004400059,0.005719075,0.000046521433,0.00009207986,0.0001444983,0.000006372356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015164344,0.0000031198829,0.000117373645,0.000023475914,0.000091788184,0.00011712574,0.00049049285,4.220049e-8,1.4932333e-7,0.9835734,0.013841204,0.001740347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014455455,0.000011019761,0.00025527895,0.00033829085,0.0000912792,0.00001593888,0.0003259289,1.2766539e-7,9.743274e-8,0.03471781,0.9639021,0.00019757243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99496436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9944509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9500609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018880719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013340301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385869093","doi":"10.59962/9780774817882","title":"Constitutional Politics in Canada after the Charter","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Politics; Political science; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.01701376880649162,"score_gpt":0.18021479397088494,"score_spread":0.16320102516439333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385869093","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014373427,0.0005536701,0.0000043428104,0.000046255118,0.00028740815,0.0002689799,0.0009250735,0.0000112191365,0.9964657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24199352,0.00022489757,0.0000102479635,0.00015321805,0.00014314412,0.0000016117411,0.000009520709,0.0000033855792,0.7574605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893934,0.00007152904,0.00013649458,0.00018882107,0.00040669664,0.00025709395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946004,0.00007386076,0.00010317004,0.000103395956,0.00018378066,0.00007574139],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010720984,0.00007302386,0.00022846107,0.0000118297985,0.0005116068,0.000038235263,0.00035888833,0.00012754549,0.00045068024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014827235,0.00013567698,0.00007884571,0.000012914097,0.004004942,0.000043969503,0.00014342109,0.00022250558,0.0000035059384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039582752,0.00004518539,0.005475803,0.00005623594,0.00025944965,0.0012203489,0.0043062493,0.0000013273344,9.647012e-8,0.5169948,0.46298403,0.008616886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001712703,0.0000055503065,0.0066923243,0.00022946174,0.00004773892,0.000005815672,0.0008097288,3.0838115e-7,4.395852e-8,0.009418084,0.9824582,0.00016147747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.999765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99996454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51947415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007423977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007161314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99870557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385869418","doi":"10.59962/9781895830439-014","title":"The Canadian Constitutional Régime","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.019622796745278524,"score_gpt":0.19418352036101033,"score_spread":0.1745607236157318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385869418","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003517047,0.0009629648,0.0000023956354,0.00014240011,0.00022906357,0.00026740736,0.0008011738,0.00003355711,0.9975259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.041568268,0.0018267063,0.000016888955,0.00006321983,0.00015905315,4.424803e-7,0.000014094845,0.000005267213,0.95634604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988969,0.000034675842,0.00012577912,0.00021422557,0.00045098216,0.00027744367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924064,0.000086306725,0.00010233841,0.000115753035,0.00026270066,0.0001922488],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016455051,0.00007973121,0.00020286084,0.000023393333,0.0044613862,0.000192175,0.00043342053,0.00025405842,0.0009157556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017408047,0.0001573155,0.00014763205,0.000007995667,0.00975183,0.00004698555,0.000070601396,0.00022519754,0.000032761094],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059240265,0.0000032160003,0.00002484614,0.000002455505,0.00010394796,0.00012282106,0.00021583521,7.6638935e-7,3.635525e-8,0.9071644,0.068669125,0.023686616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012093983,0.00000829404,0.00020285198,0.00012322863,0.000059139056,0.0000065471486,0.00012663218,2.916045e-7,2.4897034e-8,0.066152066,0.93303865,0.00016132066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99554086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8643695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029655857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025110748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385869516","doi":"10.59962/9780774817882-003","title":"Constitutional Politics in Canada: The Charter and Beyond","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Politics; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.021381657013867725,"score_gpt":0.18050546032944842,"score_spread":0.15912380331558068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385869516","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009337794,0.0006978981,0.000004409351,0.00008612834,0.0001470284,0.00020623219,0.00046009241,0.000008005931,0.99745643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43806565,0.0009789104,0.000013949728,0.00017664366,0.000098349665,5.1990503e-7,0.0000067344627,0.000003966476,0.5606553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992358,0.000027360604,0.00011085767,0.00016772444,0.0002826957,0.00017555032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956965,0.000064423395,0.00009111014,0.00007051114,0.00013386505,0.00007042251],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009083251,0.00006446648,0.0002009115,0.000010903015,0.0006032696,0.00003134146,0.00020329797,0.00010574896,0.00022223416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010432731,0.00011780775,0.000043576416,0.0000052327337,0.00438816,0.000037081663,0.00013054223,0.00016884287,0.0000010812823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032740597,0.0000045836555,0.00060915475,0.0000079910105,0.0000537094,0.00011880782,0.0008011495,1.3833719e-7,5.7623303e-8,0.9802871,0.013008266,0.005105789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019698683,0.000007970546,0.004189566,0.00013951423,0.0000539564,0.000009061812,0.00092154654,4.26554e-7,6.5069e-8,0.05033958,0.9439799,0.00016141491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9993846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9309716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023959193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018471902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99832135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385870542","doi":"10.59962/9780774855938-013","title":"Welfare Rights as Equality Rights? Insights from the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Welfare rights; Law; Welfare; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.020452458561009773,"score_gpt":0.19561883273887018,"score_spread":0.1751663741778604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385870542","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00823715,0.001099061,0.0000026693083,0.00015159158,0.0003130686,0.00038020985,0.0018212366,0.000030738964,0.9879643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5492537,0.00035985807,0.000016211889,0.00004872721,0.00015684597,4.3667558e-7,0.0000325652,0.000007063193,0.45012456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998024,0.0001158494,0.0002668208,0.0003504394,0.0010056035,0.00023728656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998516,0.00019476385,0.00036663463,0.00024923688,0.0005395895,0.00013372413],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009568615,0.0001419617,0.00050895783,0.000015648655,0.0025865673,0.00004460578,0.00072437804,0.00027186965,0.00062640256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002015298,0.00022021082,0.00019479859,0.000014359458,0.0028317277,0.00007281132,0.00024037722,0.00026754654,0.0000026124123],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060551974,0.00005053592,0.00012732149,0.00002712066,0.00085676275,0.00065450993,0.0062735314,0.0000021892706,0.0000012837266,0.6669487,0.32314545,0.0018520749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026748434,0.000018871353,0.0015626722,0.00025966472,0.00013016751,0.000003109707,0.000528084,3.809678e-7,0.0000019255388,0.05012825,0.9468492,0.00025018188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9998104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99989617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6237038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024681722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012151144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385870847","doi":"10.59962/9780774855938-012","title":"Multiculturalism, Equality, and Canadian Constitutionalism: Cohesion and Difference","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Multiculturalism; Cohesion (chemistry); Political science; Sociology; Law; Physics; Democracy","score_opus":0.03831836513427042,"score_gpt":0.21522681353971587,"score_spread":0.17690844840544545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385870847","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010709463,0.0017663037,0.000002854902,0.000103980376,0.00010466579,0.00031563413,0.0009843381,0.000031978096,0.9859808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39284375,0.007220942,0.00006608166,0.00008910759,0.00006648727,4.072808e-7,0.000022694903,0.0000052816235,0.59968525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908197,0.000039472518,0.00011912459,0.00027508847,0.00029394912,0.00019038498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925786,0.000071220544,0.00010632031,0.0000661506,0.00025242617,0.00024600196],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008649949,0.00009428284,0.00028569836,0.00002880127,0.0014255474,0.000086735316,0.00014771802,0.00024384729,0.000072608076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002574849,0.00018728003,0.000055925062,0.0000063007888,0.0046751867,0.00005928652,0.00014647763,0.00014883363,0.0000014222485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002546165,0.000026262529,0.0017456852,0.00010881222,0.00034036933,0.00077145314,0.0116770705,5.4920685e-7,0.000007386624,0.8964817,0.05315284,0.035662413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032732557,0.000017776327,0.00901595,0.00041380353,0.00009104299,0.000038040413,0.00060481054,0.0000012529537,1.8178787e-7,0.004816846,0.9843699,0.00030308941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99285716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.931217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011474732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046328126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386095840","doi":"10.1017/s000842392300046x","title":"Who Intervenes in Supreme Court Cases in Canada?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Brock University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Charter; Politics; Constitution; Equity (law); Intervention (counseling); Psychology","score_opus":0.0526511807709244,"score_gpt":0.3191753920487523,"score_spread":0.2665242112778279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386095840","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.971008,0.00012413174,0.0000018719735,0.017360937,0.00050072634,0.000039949704,0.000012678083,0.0000019864528,0.010949724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99934834,0.000014021788,0.000005594742,0.00044924114,0.00013087834,8.8551457e-7,1.1057569e-7,0.0000014763774,0.000049428832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818015,0.00006046756,0.00025138943,0.00009691737,0.00045177506,0.00095932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985288,0.00020373512,0.000036295824,0.000040760602,0.00016580857,0.0010246269],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001327551,0.000051630257,0.00014244774,0.0003751294,0.00034333998,0.00004981994,0.0003905885,0.000021434269,0.00008024201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028830157,0.000046946585,0.00002810154,0.0014007053,0.001482556,0.00021722922,0.00002152269,0.00013657492,0.000008932634],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012706968,0.0000025240884,0.30257386,0.000001195559,0.0000011446525,0.00079000916,0.00060312665,0.000021514341,0.000005400256,0.69490033,0.00075741025,0.0003422113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077376244,0.000017725262,0.9688151,0.0000937536,0.0000016682559,0.000018553816,0.009573072,0.000020638634,0.000020309506,0.015897702,0.0053912997,0.000072782495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9995602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99997276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67900264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030187499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03683666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9686236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386183732","doi":"10.59962/9780774851787-010","title":"The New Constitutionalism and the Polarizing Performance of the Canadian Conversation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Conversation; Political science; Psychology; Communication; Law; Democracy","score_opus":0.021159105114249566,"score_gpt":0.1938852228696552,"score_spread":0.17272611775540564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386183732","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001301321,0.00121336,0.0000052989553,0.00058362226,0.0002452347,0.00038403363,0.000110828914,0.000007841087,0.99614847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58718044,0.0011953005,0.000013291218,0.00010016176,0.00009274084,1.8414879e-7,0.0000021624044,0.0000032368648,0.41141248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992009,0.000044460703,0.00012190734,0.00011584121,0.00036845377,0.00014846704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992298,0.00016621735,0.00019022333,0.00010112598,0.00023969906,0.000072946015],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041806707,0.000055820135,0.00015234253,0.000014698793,0.0030177836,0.00008520506,0.00033687174,0.00014057125,0.00003145143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041992575,0.000065685585,0.00008863696,0.000012197185,0.00841475,0.000047409612,0.00011555421,0.00018956585,7.2212794e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020764093,0.0000012441659,0.00040187922,0.0000078097855,0.00009507281,0.000003702805,0.0019247535,9.149685e-7,2.6297164e-7,0.981651,0.0054080295,0.010484539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044114998,0.00000710734,0.0036500655,0.00022843697,0.00011065178,0.00000541117,0.0007346173,0.0000042299953,5.3128446e-7,0.01596315,0.97875476,0.000099865174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99091506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97334677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001324942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014693333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99828017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386308524","doi":"10.1093/he/9780191995729.003.0064","title":"Re Resolution to Amend the Constitution of Canada [1981] 1 SCR 753 Supreme Court of Canada (also known as the Patriation Reference)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04284695964877525,"score_gpt":0.23096518949220327,"score_spread":0.18811822984342802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386308524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00053224404,0.000087182314,0.0000285156,0.0020453227,0.00047075795,0.00055542914,0.0005939696,0.000021128508,0.99566543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37766984,0.0006060307,0.000009904168,0.00015987857,0.00018386694,0.000002643573,0.00003422214,0.000008834619,0.6213248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982656,0.00010670638,0.00024244249,0.00022655055,0.00089810905,0.00026059328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998584,0.00026630325,0.0003347702,0.00022651766,0.00049539626,0.00009301446],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039382224,0.00016679833,0.00027136164,0.000054244905,0.0014929696,0.000015915115,0.00049220683,0.0001491345,0.00003489334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000114365226,0.00013257835,0.000073742085,0.000047715755,0.0008916587,0.000051085986,0.0001707872,0.00022803806,3.983173e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007940468,0.0000026122016,0.000013066472,0.000011340581,0.000108619155,0.0000088961215,0.00097385753,0.00012448248,0.0000042897686,0.9773485,0.020838177,0.00048676226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011807808,0.000026483649,0.0001290879,0.0001311229,0.00011860694,2.829883e-7,0.0032505412,0.0000059988124,0.000023961527,0.0053404258,0.99070805,0.00014734817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99240804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99892855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97200805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080580584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071212947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386309250","doi":"10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i04.5904","title":"Judicial Independence and Reformation of the Collegium System: Evaluating the Njac Judgement and Foreign Judicial Appointment Systems","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Judicial independence; Dissenting opinion; Law; Political science; Democracy; Doctrine; Independence (probability theory); Supreme court; Commission; Economic Justice; Politics","score_opus":0.1946743660169466,"score_gpt":0.48570318426204445,"score_spread":0.29102881824509785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386309250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9648154,0.00080829405,0.00027592815,0.016867144,0.004407809,0.0019765473,0.00010398962,0.000033585613,0.010711335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99766403,0.00041523663,0.000038871458,0.000015452273,0.0014211071,0.00014902069,0.000004348039,0.0000062128247,0.00028573445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99614286,0.00052368944,0.0004339571,0.00017378337,0.0023969235,0.00032879735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997328,0.0007474584,0.00022921417,0.00009162442,0.001525398,0.00007833227],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008900713,0.00009110885,0.00015117103,0.00019262831,0.0042338315,0.00021882374,0.00054122705,0.00006690864,0.0000048997417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008104149,0.000053967255,0.00007611473,0.0003949568,0.00095281313,0.00024316394,0.0006431684,0.00031807125,0.000005876158],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007776203,0.00009626418,0.014372363,0.000099314086,0.00038674468,0.000017697777,0.020392273,0.000969549,0.00070627965,0.94859856,0.0051563764,0.008426973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004539788,0.0015272872,0.1296416,0.0023254734,0.00017906145,0.0002573454,0.5228243,0.054909408,0.00023038879,0.265273,0.017720748,0.00057157746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022430746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00055528147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6833255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040627355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050528796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386313392","doi":"10.1515/9780888647221-009","title":"8 Even When We’re Winning, Are We Losing? Métis Rights in Canadian Courts","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Alberta Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.030768758217116103,"score_gpt":0.2216634698582044,"score_spread":0.1908947116410883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386313392","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027774504,0.0005585373,0.0000022055108,0.0020421366,0.0002370188,0.00032929992,0.000056692938,0.00001557586,0.99648076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09221545,0.00034738434,0.000031815456,0.000065226726,0.00016208024,4.781061e-7,0.000008606711,0.000009076228,0.90715986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987208,0.00004441592,0.00015445212,0.00030812476,0.0003528224,0.00041933058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990577,0.00012267879,0.00021825073,0.00016515909,0.00016591967,0.0002702585],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000997992,0.00021587877,0.00038855878,0.00018710099,0.0008641981,0.000027329417,0.00046599132,0.00037089104,0.0008256798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014843998,0.00024825556,0.00012555107,0.000009431281,0.001118814,0.00008664127,0.00013874694,0.0002572664,0.000058704794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013132869,0.000008340243,0.00026781854,0.000018721254,0.00012772653,0.00007015252,0.02046192,0.0000030674248,2.7360815e-7,0.94692034,0.031036744,0.0010717583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017260853,0.00001257183,0.000102302554,0.0006218357,0.000068791494,5.04877e-7,0.0006648745,0.0000018929582,0.0000016718009,0.04885408,0.94923145,0.00026745003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99509907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91819465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003999922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069577707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386314887","doi":"10.1017/s1537592723001767","title":"Contending Orders: Legal Pluralism and the Rule of Law. By Geoffrey Swenson. New York: Oxford University Press, 2022. 288p. $74.00 cloth.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Law; Pluralism (philosophy); Political science; Philosophy; Mathematics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03284308120416296,"score_gpt":0.27990432705217866,"score_spread":0.2470612458480157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386314887","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1746914,0.0088582905,0.000051936255,0.033833757,0.0005006525,0.00056445634,0.00040547113,0.0002329003,0.78086114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868822,0.0041894666,0.000023687466,0.00025904397,0.00027445547,0.0000016540347,0.000004150286,0.0000064145815,0.00835894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989294,0.00011412062,0.00011043846,0.00020304327,0.0002931586,0.00034985258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932986,0.00029142754,0.00007135971,0.00009602736,0.00010973061,0.00010158576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022085774,0.00010783684,0.00019625395,0.000040532297,0.0010448559,0.000051641113,0.00019672052,0.000059199625,0.000023321125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002226319,0.00008824465,0.00007701822,0.00019003618,0.0024993333,0.00013788199,0.00009627259,0.0001349639,0.0000047942685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044950557,0.000023707868,0.00017882366,0.0000029385608,0.000067419234,0.000003326573,0.02767924,0.0000034902955,0.00000907374,0.9603551,0.011583609,0.00004831697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008322331,0.000034899524,0.00077968853,0.000025558105,0.000038357462,6.910572e-7,0.17384979,0.000020042127,0.000035173503,0.036227513,0.78801864,0.00013741931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16632006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010876777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9241276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015366887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019064448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9208898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386515256","doi":"10.1515/9781772125351-018","title":"Fourteen Premiere Peter Lougheed, Alberta and the Transformation of Constitutionalism in Canada, 1971–1985","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Alberta Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Transformation (genetics); History; Political science; Art history; Law; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.019879701424450752,"score_gpt":0.20233017235509007,"score_spread":0.18245047093063932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386515256","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00094846694,0.0003776776,0.00001332353,0.0008259592,0.000074986565,0.00038222363,0.000056113626,0.000002881224,0.9973184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6612802,0.0008110905,0.000023433813,0.00008304087,0.00007173986,7.461304e-7,0.000014617385,0.0000054782786,0.33770967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990465,0.00005231506,0.0002221766,0.00016054703,0.0003659202,0.00015255102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990524,0.0004817942,0.00020840394,0.000104503335,0.0000974494,0.000055473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014111346,0.00014555152,0.00034708777,0.000042893673,0.00031462006,0.0000073844944,0.00025887022,0.0001365656,0.00009957595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028347493,0.00013415675,0.000092696784,0.0000101216665,0.0023759103,0.00008983184,0.00007032196,0.00016504184,0.0000015217977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000118183416,0.000004390212,0.000067988694,0.000018790386,0.00010479182,0.000002163859,0.014961968,0.000012549171,3.859661e-7,0.98306745,0.00035955053,0.0012818028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011582902,0.000009959298,0.00022809664,0.00024627798,0.00017199777,0.0000020418038,0.0014435186,0.000015738111,0.0000057735865,0.009968227,0.9865455,0.00020457622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9960801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99878985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98618597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002070261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012138414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.875414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386652022","doi":"10.4324/9781003252788-6","title":"The Brazilian legal system","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.022565549498909897,"score_gpt":0.2609830848130064,"score_spread":0.2384175353140965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386652022","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[8.4975795e-7,0.0017660361,0.0000036564636,0.0047786925,0.0012672608,0.00016094891,0.00001587916,0.00010741126,0.99189925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019418295,0.0008094709,0.0000033633728,0.00019667638,0.0008494689,0.000016939635,0.0000031167149,0.00000687598,0.9786958],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896616,0.000028230703,0.0001367016,0.00014725099,0.0005468201,0.00017481201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995961,0.0001347742,0.000064616994,0.0000999639,0.00005809986,0.000046449328],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034052948,0.00010043869,0.00013029092,0.000017688428,0.004783425,0.000082494465,0.00029095617,0.0000713445,0.0021872872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023393739,0.000066892724,0.000118381126,0.000022818374,0.00075016567,0.000045445788,0.00012826078,0.0001903548,0.00037922093],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025559339,0.0000010245454,0.0000028755635,0.0000014712757,0.00003796875,0.000009362046,0.0001310674,1.8225289e-7,2.8978082e-8,0.97798574,0.019044422,0.0027832992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018983632,0.0000070222127,0.0000062592285,0.000012125274,0.000016917906,0.0000011111138,0.0017553904,1.7265184e-7,4.782835e-8,0.042148773,0.9559399,0.00009332943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013859974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025929961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93689543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026984717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036897865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386711153","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.2023.06.12","title":"Grounds-Based Distinctions: Contested Starting Points in Equality Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Doctrine; Law; Charter; Legislature; Political science; Meaning (existential); Common law; Sociology; Law and economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.06390549496755529,"score_gpt":0.3022023849584156,"score_spread":0.23829688999086032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386711153","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8962223,0.00047568165,0.00004218932,0.045955777,0.0004605219,0.0001731189,0.000032407515,0.000017625416,0.056620367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968423,0.000034998662,0.0000117192485,0.0026453726,0.00017875966,0.000009536735,0.000001849078,0.0000043321015,0.00027111705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878407,0.00028367696,0.00030154272,0.00008888259,0.00014290333,0.00039892888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888563,0.0004909654,0.00014496059,0.00006013711,0.00010775643,0.00031052064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003069045,0.00007387026,0.0002338469,0.00008985766,0.0008829504,0.00011734186,0.00015649125,0.00003895131,0.000044541615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056492764,0.000059924525,0.00006129859,0.00036726543,0.0011714852,0.00015898483,0.000014517693,0.00018874029,0.000009357655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000363911,0.000005582682,0.0056930766,0.0000060515026,0.000024648318,0.000048558093,0.014722766,0.000020039388,8.857995e-7,0.97903246,0.00009796125,0.0003115645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001667851,0.000056392826,0.01237727,0.00016725062,0.000017718216,0.00000903947,0.03034772,0.000039079026,0.000002250885,0.8942478,0.06090837,0.00015928436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19954805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.76718616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5676381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042373748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007020689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8057822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386714498","doi":"10.1111/capa.12540","title":"Navigating entangled terrain: The Supreme Court's impact and the dismissal powers of human rights tribunals","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Tribunal; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Human rights; Jurisprudence; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.03343759305254735,"score_gpt":0.3388929615062805,"score_spread":0.30545536845373317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386714498","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85635394,0.00010111095,0.000004511549,0.13285498,0.00012403795,0.00030425726,0.000065322754,0.000026871023,0.010164992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994851,0.000009561306,0.0000012982143,0.00016331051,0.00017426044,0.000018930843,0.000043436434,0.0000026143764,0.00010152492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990793,0.00012439962,0.000171524,0.00010675955,0.00025484234,0.00026320777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993481,0.00019840481,0.0000851018,0.00008189774,0.000100781916,0.00018572976],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096291787,0.000070629285,0.000108537635,0.000029405486,0.0025554071,0.00014729024,0.00016661226,0.000046117082,0.00009992936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002849685,0.000041516832,0.00005736481,0.0003749831,0.0012839254,0.00015131063,0.0000145962385,0.000105319596,0.0000054819125],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009820117,0.0000063777043,0.00507867,0.0000017015279,0.00004775702,0.000005561548,0.005079548,2.843186e-7,0.000025171836,0.98582715,0.0031829868,0.0007349635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029617897,0.00045371283,0.16865586,0.00016045487,0.00017165832,0.00002398282,0.082506515,0.0003878389,0.00021093688,0.31980038,0.4238546,0.000812264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15450567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82060677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6661011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011656016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008738464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386969811","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12664","title":"Discursive mismatch and globalization by stealth: The fight against corruption in the Brazilian legal field","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Danmarks Grundforskningsfond; National Research Foundation; University of Toronto; Styrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete","keywords":"Globalization; Language change; Political science; Criminal law; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Law; Political economy; Law and economics","score_opus":0.023516375793032902,"score_gpt":0.32934933382937054,"score_spread":0.30583295803633764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386969811","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037133726,0.4131109,0.000024697096,0.49285117,0.00044012954,0.0017603422,0.00004662534,0.00009056237,0.08796218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07417237,0.8679352,0.0000059914455,0.057274796,0.00015505306,0.00009531239,0.000033398803,0.00000278486,0.00032511394],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990865,0.0002052241,0.0001465418,0.00012239348,0.0002678457,0.00017151481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996042,0.00019854099,0.000056089582,0.00007820412,0.00003834072,0.000024611158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008032934,0.00006740072,0.00012556328,5.9178024e-7,0.0010489913,0.000057609464,0.00016442616,0.000044017757,0.000018336592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009312969,0.00003737885,0.00008678782,0.000472782,0.00030761992,0.000110133464,0.000036863516,0.000102339596,0.000024152863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011548688,0.000016104017,0.0007413232,0.00015992855,0.000014625745,9.615464e-7,0.0040493035,8.2001094e-7,0.0000022688669,0.4245512,0.5582585,0.0122038415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049833514,0.000007835555,0.0005656441,0.0003639511,0.000019890489,3.4857018e-7,0.004231117,0.0000062216013,4.8572264e-7,0.004216521,0.99048156,0.00005660568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029836579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005777525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45482427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039284445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049149505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8068099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386996164","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102676","title":"Weaponizing post-election court challenges: Assessing losers’ motivations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Negotiation; Legitimacy; Democracy; Politics; Government (linguistics); Petitioner; General election; Kenya; Vulnerability (computing); Public administration; Political economy; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Supreme court; Computer security","score_opus":0.17648507481869863,"score_gpt":0.3995127728387146,"score_spread":0.22302769802001599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386996164","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85182416,0.027945926,0.00008598014,0.073455915,0.0025119185,0.0004974453,0.000009794591,0.0014173895,0.04225146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99436647,0.0039209225,0.000043523087,0.00018510036,0.00081786345,0.00004744478,0.000005430032,0.000009143855,0.00060409267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859613,0.00012229498,0.00017354349,0.00024250764,0.0004144093,0.00045109008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990393,0.0002976313,0.00009332882,0.0000662008,0.00044825728,0.000055285982],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049442117,0.00013081454,0.00021081808,0.00012836444,0.0031690444,0.00007493415,0.000115005896,0.00005864992,0.000024178073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013133024,0.000121137746,0.000074361145,0.00094546523,0.00044438962,0.0003445201,0.00007714164,0.00013205402,0.00018011594],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060514056,0.00032150807,0.17394733,0.000109184875,0.0019625383,0.00007967616,0.08110879,0.00012406781,0.0050586825,0.57268184,0.06235721,0.10218867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047256672,0.00017251728,0.618009,0.0002444916,0.00012242032,0.000002898931,0.11634357,0.0000345844,0.0003528691,0.036777575,0.22665964,0.00080790505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041592093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023987047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5359042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000268434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001739154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387081316","doi":"10.21991/cf29458","title":"Is Canadian Constitutional Law Canadian?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Law; International law; Constitutional law; Political science; Comparative law; Municipal law; Public law; Warrant; Common law; Economics","score_opus":0.03660565353978708,"score_gpt":0.28707364655266465,"score_spread":0.2504679930128776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387081316","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013503119,0.0010126062,0.0021031587,0.08212509,0.0055224,0.0010201781,0.0029427763,0.0007296324,0.90319383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786461,0.00036210226,0.00020244336,0.017353699,0.0007516787,0.00020472353,0.0005585706,0.000015958853,0.001904703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99401164,0.00015611267,0.00077759125,0.0009486213,0.0013325715,0.002773465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958563,0.00029335634,0.00015492637,0.00043805118,0.000993251,0.0022641066],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009883697,0.0005674945,0.00054200075,0.0011671063,0.015095035,0.00035798992,0.00083033374,0.000553657,0.0028350865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079443114,0.0006269477,0.00042683363,0.0022123193,0.04112337,0.0011347869,0.00017369125,0.00054560305,0.009632137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014631036,0.000032579464,0.017716624,0.0000058211645,0.00014108115,0.00018225334,0.00029829773,0.00025365062,0.000011383036,0.8778024,0.10321964,0.00032168126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006270313,0.000019563231,0.00094670116,0.00010061281,0.000056043813,0.00008494885,0.0035998228,0.00008428971,0.000025506451,0.15154034,0.8422009,0.000714274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8855285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97126776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9772958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023216035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03255103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387134573","doi":"10.59962/9780774869102","title":"A Culture of Justification","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028964472148682,"score_gpt":0.22329336954437748,"score_spread":0.19432889739569548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387134573","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019726422,0.00039120603,0.000017732234,0.0000130189455,0.00019865639,0.00026147245,0.00067638536,0.00006760483,0.99817663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006041048,0.0010856632,0.00004782031,0.000006590539,0.000109440225,4.961341e-7,0.00003310111,0.0000066004927,0.9926692],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990966,0.000048998103,0.00013194862,0.00019632983,0.00039184606,0.00013429894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917245,0.000050032777,0.00023096011,0.00010063561,0.00039413074,0.000051812465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013646006,0.00005470751,0.00026729386,0.000023758192,0.0004343136,0.00003294141,0.0003175984,0.00024473475,0.00006455774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041473926,0.00013031825,0.00013571573,0.000025718555,0.0015004006,0.00004095692,0.00012515899,0.0001307466,0.000007510612],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012214296,0.000031651904,0.00005414982,0.00013924151,0.0002029156,0.000058430516,0.007300232,0.0000014869604,0.0000073300716,0.04826546,0.92167985,0.022247061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016345028,0.000019878069,0.0006506593,0.0005011865,0.00015174388,8.6137595e-7,0.0023833553,6.1144414e-7,6.792965e-7,0.01500099,0.98097956,0.00014702718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.62445515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6909679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06651277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010453761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005681834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55282885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387143841","doi":"10.59962/9780774868853-008","title":"An Emerging Constitutional Culture in Canada’s Postwar Moment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Moment (physics); Political science; Physics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.024289263246643024,"score_gpt":0.2158094162594221,"score_spread":0.19152015301277908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387143841","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00064271054,0.0003824946,0.00001299789,0.000061541345,0.00032244736,0.0002935233,0.0011573514,0.000048041416,0.9970789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.124223076,0.0014279782,0.00004780691,0.00006181296,0.0001333071,8.782741e-7,0.00006519305,0.00001015553,0.8740298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868107,0.000036597514,0.0001630038,0.00029275494,0.00058565295,0.00024091123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940705,0.00002950935,0.00012843203,0.0000954372,0.0002176445,0.00012193911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012359345,0.00009279755,0.0002904988,0.00003495565,0.0006495583,0.000048395505,0.00032442753,0.0001594369,0.00020851314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010599653,0.00021348552,0.00007871233,0.000015150734,0.0015860012,0.00007541975,0.00012096969,0.00021745947,0.0000037335185],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018258743,0.0000251251,0.000928631,0.000035737157,0.00017689787,0.0012336656,0.0027461548,0.00004252306,0.0000021029261,0.891766,0.09075701,0.012267863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029041048,0.000017996346,0.0015125966,0.0004449549,0.00005126398,0.000003896006,0.003106282,0.000003350903,1.3901717e-7,0.010778483,0.9835032,0.00028737524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99955606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99994916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8927462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007055445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035758025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87056863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387349674","doi":"10.7202/1106113ar","title":"Une jurisprudence à la fois consultative et constituante — La redéfinition des règles du jeu constitutionnel entre le Québec et le Canada par les renvois de la Cour suprême","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Jurisprudence; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.013309707735884167,"score_gpt":0.2540394026017987,"score_spread":0.24072969486591453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387349674","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58370197,0.008326437,0.0054526315,0.06169442,0.00058470777,0.00043094438,0.0013036861,0.000290087,0.33821508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98488003,0.008797091,0.00055044645,0.00090411183,0.00016084983,0.000071469716,0.000059963982,0.000020634345,0.0045553814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963217,0.0015486781,0.00041656103,0.0004635944,0.00051616033,0.00073331676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99433655,0.004736434,0.00022385719,0.00013672447,0.00028559242,0.00028085377],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016610224,0.0003438601,0.00044475327,0.000104671155,0.003100827,0.000181388,0.00032987082,0.00045004545,0.00005184611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026627472,0.00039454404,0.00016006491,0.00096973253,0.024101593,0.00036623568,0.00009482471,0.0007195484,0.000044865264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051276773,0.0001240246,0.0097430805,0.000053958513,0.00023188708,0.00061177235,0.024027877,0.0007061925,0.00015560807,0.95018524,0.011169269,0.0029398326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012801966,0.00005384309,0.025909394,0.0007166075,0.00021843094,0.00020688862,0.10800532,0.00013080677,0.00033025755,0.24016342,0.6222536,0.00073125993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98789763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9851143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7100218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016699507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0134972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387558292","doi":"10.1017/9781108680929.016","title":"Underuse of the Override","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Political science; Legislature; Law and economics; Politics; Charter; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Constitution; Democracy; Narrative; Power (physics); Normative; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05325531821910654,"score_gpt":0.23456291965180243,"score_spread":0.1813076014326959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387558292","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011818848,0.00007206363,0.000013322813,0.00013828897,0.00050434476,0.00021123893,0.0001766391,0.00007037334,0.99869555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011700011,0.00029505615,0.0000029091748,0.00005113712,0.00015873523,2.4618058e-7,0.0000024260958,0.00001000968,0.9877795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991243,0.000039794206,0.00010282992,0.00018128731,0.00038859583,0.00016322262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993554,0.00010873181,0.00014977886,0.00019430146,0.00013453541,0.00005728797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010987903,0.00012685278,0.00019950072,0.000048250324,0.0007031732,0.000012149398,0.00046037274,0.00017140883,0.0000040761092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003870229,0.00011615114,0.00020718908,0.00001520209,0.0015064266,0.000033244174,0.00037028556,0.00019418243,0.00001604572],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011009335,0.0000024494407,0.000014867118,0.000008168668,0.000086021006,0.000016271428,0.00017753054,9.771964e-7,0.0000032824212,0.98041487,0.019100884,0.00016364823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010459675,0.000006067706,0.00020376964,0.00011797467,0.00011309503,3.0185763e-7,0.0003430816,4.2164768e-7,0.000023035795,0.0013502138,0.9975986,0.0001388439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008743106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006735833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9790647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015240928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036149603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99785775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387667245","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0063","title":"The Independence of the Judiciary and Some of Its Enemies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Judicial independence; Democracy; Economic Justice; Law; Government (linguistics); Political science; Supreme court; Miller; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.015509600138397353,"score_gpt":0.23616337561439815,"score_spread":0.2206537754760008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387667245","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7319861,0.013477019,0.000010176635,0.005656115,0.0005991368,0.00013296473,0.000022417647,0.0000133633475,0.24810268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98940504,0.010310337,0.000007461261,0.000012644832,0.000047261445,1.5149187e-8,3.941178e-8,5.741551e-7,0.00021665814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943984,0.00007036965,0.00007014789,0.000035668985,0.00030010354,0.000083869774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955606,0.0001178043,0.000121533376,0.000036494494,0.0001421601,0.000025969386],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004089985,0.000027005744,0.00007657612,0.00000605859,0.0015083897,0.000005537572,0.00023365462,0.00002725577,0.00003573176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006351654,0.000018324901,0.000049918155,0.000044357166,0.001184835,0.00018635613,0.00011507737,0.000057525398,7.4937816e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023407933,0.000010417631,0.004999291,0.0000035276937,0.00005470504,0.0000026092332,0.007273257,0.000008629815,0.0002484424,0.9850656,0.00066356815,0.0016465742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073787867,0.00011915899,0.43773448,0.00031038673,0.00014505396,0.000008691704,0.23467682,0.00001785402,0.0007601578,0.17082155,0.15447941,0.00018855995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10147668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20627105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81424403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043680782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010728677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387667275","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0069","title":"The Administration of Justice: Justice Rosalie Abella’s Contribution to Canadian Administrative Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Energy","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Jurisprudence; Administrative law; Economic Justice; Legislation; Sociology; Principle of legality; Administration of justice","score_opus":0.029819710840239086,"score_gpt":0.3002272643422826,"score_spread":0.2704075535020435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387667275","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032735985,0.00078226865,0.00032460698,0.024928443,0.0015460019,0.0003823933,0.00024001783,0.000039964907,0.93902034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986637,0.00057119824,0.000054925673,0.00011518042,0.00017397037,1.3370685e-7,0.0000042135775,0.0000015281934,0.00041512804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991338,0.000108685395,0.00013038702,0.00007821566,0.0003166509,0.0002322417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988798,0.00016262525,0.00012614022,0.00005353636,0.0005467714,0.00023114456],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055410416,0.000056789755,0.00011163187,0.000015322406,0.004292534,0.00003424039,0.00022455724,0.000053925873,0.00012150159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017279519,0.00005357091,0.000061819606,0.00009325023,0.00069494115,0.00021723789,0.000026885156,0.0000752753,0.000017639226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001192617,0.000012602552,0.00004172503,0.00000315803,0.000043465643,0.000024073499,0.0034683303,0.000017810708,0.000037649443,0.9921012,0.0038298848,0.00030082528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003278928,0.00022516052,0.0048949295,0.000044993547,0.00026799986,0.00000558358,0.09785809,0.000010687341,0.0000980589,0.0065597454,0.8895839,0.00012294203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7853863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9954731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98554146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054333365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092913443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99700373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387823569","doi":"10.1093/ajlh/njad025","title":"International Legacies of a Century and a Half of the Case Method","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Legal History","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Geopolitics; Constitution; Politics; Narrative; Period (music); Colonialism; Law; Political science; Sociology; Political economy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.02289333755620614,"score_gpt":0.30692028328914,"score_spread":0.28402694573293386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387823569","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8655859,0.0048120497,0.0002561336,0.013460925,0.0031225174,0.00010234469,0.000020032372,0.000015599537,0.11262448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985886,0.0004659185,0.00043898998,0.00008284406,0.00014372925,5.9758145e-7,7.319129e-8,0.0000019592828,0.00027724076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992406,0.00014176221,0.0002119732,0.000047620233,0.0002805675,0.00007752927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991784,0.00015783595,0.00038971432,0.00003867493,0.00019759945,0.000037768026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005351074,0.000040680898,0.00016591547,0.0000879911,0.00012845117,0.0000036941,0.00014902274,0.000011528647,0.000026395386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023484012,0.00002903646,0.000094767776,0.00021083036,0.0019852633,0.00011141799,0.000046518962,0.000091602065,6.0011433e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024489718,0.000162953,0.009424162,0.000021223654,0.0005451114,0.0007573476,0.083799094,0.00006734634,0.0028943878,0.6795358,0.017194906,0.20535277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012245994,0.00008560912,0.0034565534,0.000035374294,0.000035928293,0.00020472296,0.026043784,0.0000055830774,0.000032546974,0.0006165113,0.96931374,0.00004718356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018139353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009781197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9521188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013371107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033629054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98839897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387895001","doi":"10.1017/s1744552323000253","title":"The immigrant versus the state: The marginal contribution of tribunal judges to administrative justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Appeal; Immigration; Bureaucracy; Political science; Economic Justice; Law; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.06347462636925948,"score_gpt":0.38988330320280884,"score_spread":0.32640867683354935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387895001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69693565,0.0021757847,0.00035353538,0.26712635,0.0078922855,0.0005349654,0.00014092098,0.00001783454,0.024822688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99824077,0.0005688421,0.0000049994837,0.000522729,0.00049681304,0.000009989596,0.0000015480596,0.0000022566987,0.00015205026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982198,0.00024763777,0.00041444623,0.00007072882,0.0008641203,0.00018330199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99580216,0.002713109,0.00028041206,0.000058250236,0.0011029396,0.000043152668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020645745,0.00007087332,0.00013153143,0.00004279815,0.0006459646,0.00009275558,0.0006943152,0.00002600719,0.000025602512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016738082,0.000035020952,0.00010710056,0.00025811567,0.00087748,0.00012266333,0.00007175688,0.0001987468,0.000021929984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015059101,0.000034771136,0.00054817216,6.976849e-7,0.00020388629,0.000034576897,0.009338627,0.00013671804,0.00005506268,0.9792505,0.0023049226,0.0065861624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025705406,0.00044985654,0.032338355,0.00015712254,0.00011364954,0.000022502005,0.09314494,0.00005026176,0.00050009374,0.07699508,0.7934869,0.00017068145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039610695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045095146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9022554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016311898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003400797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9723294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387911625","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0023","title":"Interpreting Dicey","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Energy","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Law; Context (archaeology); Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional law; Constitutional theory; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Political science; Law and economics; History; Democracy; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.017460022971329724,"score_gpt":0.256647569993155,"score_spread":0.2391875470218253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387911625","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029220518,0.00033626155,0.00015762009,0.0016062807,0.00033696272,0.000024766949,0.000002974354,0.000037222362,0.9682774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99823433,0.0007519792,0.00010120734,0.000036880494,0.0001264973,8.6256495e-9,2.9432653e-7,9.0938823e-7,0.00074789836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956065,0.000048963415,0.000047643825,0.000043194552,0.00018197452,0.00011759299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973977,0.000044648797,0.000049981132,0.000022819038,0.000083524305,0.000059270078],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029017194,0.000026651249,0.00006316482,0.000009313368,0.0014931007,0.0000125496435,0.00014847721,0.000023206747,0.0007247111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004013951,0.000028937508,0.000056946552,0.000037928734,0.00037889637,0.00022986041,0.000053769305,0.00004979122,0.000033539647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002866316,0.000016083883,0.0030894803,0.000001693634,0.000055270924,0.00004752566,0.023499224,0.000011584768,0.000048946444,0.9579647,0.00833873,0.0068980795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019894181,0.000028630924,0.0061713066,0.000055060264,0.00002025443,0.0000028060967,0.10714089,0.000012584315,0.000005124895,0.009569801,0.876716,0.00007859089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24222942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36084428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9690138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014461865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005839762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388004980","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2023.a910490","title":"Trust, Legal Elites, and the European Court of Human Rights","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"Danmarks Grundforskningsfond; National Research Foundation; University of Minnesota","keywords":"Political science; Human rights; Law","score_opus":0.023158624710522893,"score_gpt":0.2867771199123283,"score_spread":0.2636184952018054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388004980","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6058523,0.0001248926,0.000004404151,0.0008707102,0.00015642923,0.00018005498,0.000008847069,0.00010978838,0.39269254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944045,0.0000048930524,0.000005194449,0.000034079152,0.0006059133,0.00000843606,0.000008083014,0.0000054007387,0.0049235253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844664,0.00040426187,0.00026899276,0.00020354826,0.00038310626,0.000293465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994777,0.00011467555,0.00009860175,0.00014544671,0.00008756462,0.000075997516],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010496305,0.00011875676,0.00021773424,0.00007215949,0.004680255,0.000092707334,0.00026300843,0.000037225756,0.000111099456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006277971,0.000070160015,0.00008649857,0.00020983133,0.0024771108,0.00014738183,0.000026742631,0.00010856589,0.00014102929],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007874443,0.00002124258,0.000147554,0.0000031142306,0.000034109606,0.000018028855,0.012029675,1.1202322e-7,0.00004640716,0.98272663,0.0046229637,0.0003422636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083325844,0.00013566964,0.020319322,0.000035743265,0.000042006784,0.0000014322986,0.0014433448,0.0000027768622,0.000014713835,0.6746874,0.30232057,0.00016379937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031401988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046932656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38855213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002104233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021887916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388026880","doi":"10.5040/9781509953875","title":"Constitutionally Conforming Interpretation – Comparative Perspectives","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Scholarship; Popularity; Political science; Context (archaeology); Competence (human resources); Epistemology; Sociology; Law; History; Philosophy; Linguistics; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.07101446074485311,"score_gpt":0.3242657451808155,"score_spread":0.2532512844359624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388026880","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003852468,0.0004555378,0.00025504333,0.0013497462,0.0013922907,0.00043105878,0.00013454923,0.0004598972,0.99548334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08935861,0.00005347686,0.000078710524,0.00037698454,0.0017410907,0.000073582414,0.00016898043,0.000019871028,0.9081287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977901,0.00011106119,0.00035977407,0.00042591392,0.0009194359,0.00039371912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802864,0.0005535849,0.00028534816,0.0001350184,0.0008556827,0.00014171356],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008735623,0.0002635449,0.00043096638,0.000255433,0.0017816967,0.001402228,0.0004547659,0.0003331393,0.00016433367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00092394487,0.000270555,0.00019430414,0.00009663973,0.002461604,0.0010403928,0.00018102287,0.0006195358,0.00044537272],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013334188,0.000006597448,0.000006861572,0.000008197497,0.00013343847,0.000009967358,0.03322122,0.000003896488,0.0000017979696,0.8220599,0.14346786,0.0010668754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013551385,0.000015457048,0.000046986053,0.0003483688,0.000051656272,0.000001686844,0.017162241,0.0000109338725,0.0000019208949,0.14807601,0.8338355,0.0003137227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014769505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006709648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69036764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008057663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042048474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388058106","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780195371208.003.0001","title":"Introduction","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Legitimacy; Political science; Law; Constitution; Jargon; Judicial discretion; Power (physics); Politics; Judicial activism; Discretion; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0336026212217028,"score_gpt":0.26054539118507697,"score_spread":0.22694276996337417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388058106","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000012491546,0.0008706628,0.000018332223,0.008938335,0.00077080197,0.00006861805,0.0000024473372,0.00007552753,0.989254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00111874,0.0066547445,0.000033914133,0.00019318252,0.007680809,0.0000018349051,0.0000049809046,0.0000042482147,0.9843075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994347,0.0000051933444,0.00008115868,0.0001340134,0.0002512817,0.00009364844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997794,0.000015360269,0.000034987024,0.00005149499,0.00008484441,0.000033899898],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006215053,0.00007278509,0.00010534682,0.000030010298,0.0006411675,0.000009402469,0.000063315565,0.000114930015,0.0054487037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027988153,0.00006609305,0.00006126468,0.000013205635,0.0006529778,0.000038047176,0.000021010324,0.00009109593,0.0016357343],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.7371285e-7,0.0000013048619,0.0000015771857,2.5363727e-7,0.000012017469,0.0000018821374,0.00016957098,8.38679e-8,1.0330912e-7,0.7092502,0.28742978,0.0031323123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013508403,0.0000043308887,0.0000097031425,0.0000038859275,0.00000798459,9.555002e-7,0.000049302602,1.8730459e-8,4.0607705e-7,0.08999116,0.9098393,0.000079481426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016135877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022219222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62240946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000075745396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015704092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99914163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388080729","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780195372472.003.0025","title":"Anonymity and the Law in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Anonymity; Unavailability; Identity (music); Internet privacy; Computer science; Computer security; Genealogy; Political science; Engineering; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.023334680036750752,"score_gpt":0.222052528150051,"score_spread":0.19871784811330023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388080729","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007560092,0.0020962644,3.8676063e-7,0.004462671,0.00012155455,0.00011021291,0.000006054968,0.0000053624367,0.99312186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6482184,0.008755073,0.0000057417847,0.0029682517,0.00025411177,0.000005347021,0.0000011671876,0.0000034384832,0.33978844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994974,0.000015962394,0.00008325114,0.00008840356,0.00021963066,0.00009531079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997491,0.00013600275,0.000025334948,0.000036905047,0.000025818641,0.000026837182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011101644,0.00006352672,0.00013719205,0.0000072885236,0.0005147705,0.0000083993,0.00007383357,0.00004432096,0.00020724136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017513656,0.00003961824,0.000020998388,0.0000118637045,0.0015581844,0.000018651363,0.000038478716,0.000102657876,0.0000071914196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041310172,4.816018e-7,0.00013402593,3.881575e-7,0.000007926807,0.000010760219,0.00028097586,9.5956e-8,2.796372e-9,0.99397284,0.005080161,0.00050822675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000106984975,8.799949e-7,0.00031649377,0.000009188984,0.000004347673,6.2243214e-7,0.00030125995,1.7325702e-7,4.4976566e-8,0.12710017,0.87209815,0.00006166864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9993288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.867018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018130933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013041927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57411957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388120681","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198258223.003.0011","title":"The Impact of a Bill of Rights on the Role of the Judiciary: A Canadian Perspective","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Legislature; Constitution; Law; Politics; Bill of rights; Judicial review; Public interest; Fundamental rights; Perspective (graphical); Subject (documents); Legislation; Human rights","score_opus":0.014525185292019377,"score_gpt":0.25903123268835093,"score_spread":0.24450604739633156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388120681","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012820684,0.0012918342,4.4161876e-8,0.0033395374,0.00007173299,0.0003403465,0.00013692875,0.0000043272416,0.9935332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930435,0.00046151347,5.074242e-7,0.00006550891,0.00015510111,0.00000426005,4.236578e-7,0.000004442188,0.0062647606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989924,0.00006186189,0.00019736533,0.00012352427,0.00043614669,0.00018874001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989321,0.0003408537,0.00019477453,0.00020169992,0.0002753612,0.000055195705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026625275,0.00013447316,0.00024329392,0.000050419803,0.0010475095,0.000009136168,0.00045162396,0.00011086037,0.0006707251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000075895914,0.00004481161,0.0003552277,0.00009269016,0.0025439558,0.000018618013,0.000033503322,0.0001704867,0.000013297667],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015332209,0.000008453695,0.000077209035,1.0134439e-7,0.0001984506,2.9812648e-7,0.002997652,0.00000391201,0.0000014449905,0.9954745,0.0010692565,0.00015335369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000302819,0.000049133956,0.00111966,0.00006185056,0.00003707061,1.8930801e-7,0.002899316,8.2501884e-7,0.000015872809,0.9581831,0.03753832,0.00006434226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99350464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9529341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9917614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030630475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016242914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93733114},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4388137250","doi":"10.1515/9781552389911","title":"Law, Politics, and the Judicial Process in Canada, 4th Edition","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Politics; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Computer science; Sociology; Programming language","score_opus":0.014835159550301215,"score_gpt":0.20918638537617792,"score_spread":0.19435122582587672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388137250","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030078558,0.00025005874,0.000014138525,0.00015627989,0.00021591071,0.0002576864,0.000047088884,0.000009249027,0.9987488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2084625,0.0006076259,0.000031460913,0.0007124169,0.0015085433,0.000002234902,0.000036144622,0.000015763277,0.78862333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910104,0.00009557175,0.000103420985,0.0001507314,0.00037243715,0.00017678163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947655,0.00012789332,0.0001123402,0.0000676794,0.00015731408,0.00005824862],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017317508,0.000096702715,0.00023707496,0.000028792445,0.00066736585,0.000009118821,0.00022715071,0.000110116474,0.000021631857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025336434,0.00009141271,0.000039382947,0.000010235572,0.0040070633,0.000041947744,0.00009828259,0.00016100652,7.6513146e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005679982,0.0000034459222,0.000023715833,0.000017139257,0.000032160588,0.0000126764635,0.0034708062,3.3237134e-7,3.6835793e-8,0.9907851,0.0053119175,0.00028584903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006472031,0.000013854576,0.00017548147,0.00016184631,0.00009271092,5.5891127e-7,0.0018376058,0.000007993634,0.0000028033737,0.18427399,0.8126303,0.0001556724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99357843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99666345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8073184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003662124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003511351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388137317","doi":"10.1515/9781552389911-002","title":"The Rule of Law in the Canadian Constitution","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Rule of law; Political science","score_opus":0.03792333151521577,"score_gpt":0.22821491347310258,"score_spread":0.1902915819578868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388137317","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004560663,0.0003333683,0.0000070818305,0.0001652862,0.00011427432,0.00020777201,0.000027420772,0.00000536117,0.99909383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3243043,0.0007004729,0.000060204697,0.00038450034,0.00026337834,9.121824e-7,0.000013754002,0.0000073344618,0.67426515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993354,0.000052759537,0.00009557816,0.000096116586,0.00028535692,0.00013480053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994812,0.00010954924,0.000102310245,0.00011519101,0.00014820059,0.000043569882],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003066674,0.000073441595,0.00013333689,0.00003492482,0.0013349502,0.000012336056,0.00039603852,0.00014002332,0.00004773636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014427196,0.00005701031,0.00007387724,0.0000066681437,0.0066452706,0.000028076694,0.00005398716,0.00013747411,0.000005900552],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014312722,0.0000021870428,0.000007792417,0.0000031302088,0.000028452168,0.0000097802795,0.0049511367,2.2001817e-7,3.665744e-7,0.9937516,0.00045653348,0.0007744981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007493928,0.000011486457,0.0000481207,0.00005532139,0.000035119105,3.697798e-7,0.0005302669,6.7231065e-7,0.0000030125243,0.06022267,0.9389581,0.000059896112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89590234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98095965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9385016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000107373504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000708736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388147282","doi":"10.1515/9781552389911-017","title":"Chief Justices of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.025192999512104387,"score_gpt":0.2056910773202813,"score_spread":0.18049807780817692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388147282","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00056835095,0.00027044734,0.000015509035,0.00005316914,0.00023829714,0.00015447901,0.00008928194,0.0000056979457,0.9986048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10636176,0.00022229509,0.000059132366,0.000038590395,0.00013097042,1.0130354e-7,0.0000026744406,0.000006411129,0.89317805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909127,0.00003209531,0.00013030028,0.00011615142,0.0005151436,0.00011503155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991437,0.000076731965,0.000299541,0.00013992234,0.00029543974,0.000044618104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010556174,0.000094621675,0.00025610352,0.000023346827,0.0003703873,0.0000020359525,0.00045837005,0.00011470009,0.00023146735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023144927,0.00008591019,0.00011215431,0.0000071052955,0.0026041847,0.000021853033,0.00020421355,0.00009986412,4.6000022e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037095255,0.00000600709,0.000039640738,0.000042133393,0.0001426181,0.0000035071348,0.0022661977,0.0000012292286,0.000009423016,0.9929945,0.0039288313,0.00052883435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013788487,0.00002524414,0.00038053302,0.00023929721,0.0002450834,2.3108088e-7,0.00076179765,0.0000024726244,0.00012497358,0.008895816,0.989064,0.0001227134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84567314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9017942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98513514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006713742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012511995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9595227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388147283","doi":"10.1515/9781552389911-012","title":"The Harper Conservatives and the Canadian Judiciary","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.031459418632881785,"score_gpt":0.2162678948478779,"score_spread":0.1848084762149961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388147283","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000039409602,0.0018867763,0.000007447959,0.0010504461,0.00013323559,0.00027106743,0.000022587403,0.000012903537,0.99657613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011283848,0.0022502071,0.000026292893,0.00040296602,0.00018160325,5.329731e-7,0.0000026891767,0.0000067197943,0.98584515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992694,0.00008468813,0.00008406541,0.00013897628,0.00025499708,0.00016783047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991531,0.00032257434,0.00010482648,0.00011828992,0.00020428839,0.00009697187],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034391793,0.000106643274,0.00018351068,0.000028199594,0.003767548,0.00003408633,0.00032686643,0.00014582236,0.00008709625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040435007,0.000074933414,0.000081805985,0.000005188551,0.01371965,0.00003258511,0.00013949427,0.00017569323,0.000008043978],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056616223,7.14506e-7,0.000012946256,0.0000018583303,0.00011860422,0.0000075323665,0.005341157,2.0093125e-8,8.8099625e-8,0.98837024,0.004369641,0.00172057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019258983,0.000008379152,0.000134214,0.000043074644,0.00007772845,4.5839366e-7,0.0007338597,0.000002159203,4.9237525e-7,0.12079674,0.8779263,0.00008401775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82053703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9487162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8735567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000070892056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000693727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388147289","doi":"10.1515/9781552389911-004","title":"The Canadian Judicial System","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.029930341652388538,"score_gpt":0.21019967364742068,"score_spread":0.18026933199503214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388147289","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000009378072,0.0004307791,0.000014787282,0.00007543046,0.00044853069,0.00022194507,0.0000344569,0.000036978297,0.99872774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012239623,0.00019826696,0.000022031967,0.000037143516,0.00047362017,2.3607149e-7,0.0000041543094,0.000007841952,0.9870171],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990731,0.000041640807,0.00010287016,0.0001605283,0.00039007305,0.00023180223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922913,0.00007023672,0.00012706814,0.00013887105,0.00027313764,0.00016153754],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021881015,0.00011637117,0.00019248162,0.000049809056,0.0035684789,0.000027652286,0.0004423223,0.0002426812,0.000087289875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011911944,0.00011151459,0.00012430185,0.000005606919,0.0032041476,0.000025232777,0.00010390883,0.00016216634,0.000048914062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019182713,7.8671803e-7,0.0000025212744,0.000005627986,0.000086853644,0.000027627073,0.0015174026,5.4419846e-8,1.13909344e-7,0.9911639,0.004571174,0.0026047262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007113853,0.000014834644,0.000015373924,0.00010012797,0.00008462946,6.072725e-7,0.0006211348,0.0000017502956,9.3818744e-7,0.012396069,0.98657334,0.00012003863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8673444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9774848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9820022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038065726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012539576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99950856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388175302","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198258223.003.0012","title":"The Impact of a Bill of Rights on the Role of the Judiciary: An Australian Perspective","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Appeal; Political science; Law; Government (linguistics); Democracy; Perspective (graphical); Politics","score_opus":0.02736974861988235,"score_gpt":0.3037085387329319,"score_spread":0.27633879011304957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388175302","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0045541134,0.00042764068,7.065735e-8,0.0021950507,0.000087480854,0.0003300458,0.000088176545,0.000008103369,0.99230933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840266,0.00032699906,0.0000011421323,0.000027136497,0.00021189221,0.000003587679,6.3715777e-7,0.000004959566,0.015397054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988175,0.00009179766,0.00023768938,0.0001493374,0.00053762516,0.00016603079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989327,0.00024869124,0.00026893642,0.00024833993,0.00026504011,0.00003629495],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031328754,0.0001553805,0.00027114621,0.000032249445,0.00086331944,0.000011613647,0.000518812,0.00012434072,0.00078280026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045109773,0.00005100584,0.00037949727,0.000082255305,0.0031838575,0.000037100584,0.000044763365,0.00018956445,0.0000145219765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035207628,0.000029193334,0.00007830627,1.8027602e-7,0.00019148955,2.0057144e-7,0.003073197,0.0000058266774,0.000008693545,0.9954039,0.00095316384,0.00022065212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004098669,0.000099484896,0.001689449,0.000059568254,0.000048888112,2.0052506e-7,0.0045894776,6.509179e-7,0.000076516444,0.9715174,0.021800468,0.000076948425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48090893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047071777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97947246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012316178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037800468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388193574","doi":"10.1515/9782763759449-007","title":"La Cour suprême du Canada","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; History; Political science","score_opus":0.024657705322597808,"score_gpt":0.2317779641660716,"score_spread":0.2071202588434738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388193574","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00050302356,0.0024933384,0.0000049682885,0.017959503,0.0023704916,0.0001307919,0.00017050812,0.00003032106,0.9763371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5173476,0.0038976683,0.000016604212,0.001437837,0.001081106,0.000013192111,0.000014623406,0.000011864926,0.47617954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824816,0.00008772907,0.00023029716,0.000281623,0.00085038046,0.00030182602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918675,0.00038882357,0.00009545958,0.00008927221,0.000102876395,0.00013683607],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029098167,0.00022852785,0.00030156362,0.000024473107,0.0019754223,0.000024734467,0.00028918163,0.0001365777,0.06374842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005900925,0.00022258726,0.00012741926,0.000066317676,0.0016039924,0.00006589018,0.00021562788,0.00035070573,0.00019834927],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038036558,0.0000112652315,0.00061542896,0.0000039038337,0.00010851923,0.0001644451,0.0002600861,0.0000064367528,1.6203838e-7,0.9752847,0.019516762,0.004024472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006378109,0.000016464872,0.00034453144,0.00001540145,0.000055538356,0.000010274273,0.0013259083,0.0000014462416,1.9942445e-7,0.042447012,0.95544124,0.0002781923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9950162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99653685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9359245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00084775785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034686131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99932384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388414526","doi":"10.1017/s0003055423001119","title":"Publius’ Proleptic Constitution","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Federalist; Constitution; Polity; Politics; Political science; Law; Federalism; Separation of powers; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.0499977275707965,"score_gpt":0.4003813273920599,"score_spread":0.3503835998212634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388414526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008563571,0.0037681514,0.00007006924,0.14288153,0.00039270165,0.00060932955,0.000009016166,0.0003495801,0.8433561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811044,0.012469567,0.00006596025,0.0059556267,0.00018663311,0.00005194031,0.0000013101002,0.0000020397033,0.00016253759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973443,0.00010546665,0.00020717744,0.00029237353,0.0008664857,0.001184162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988841,0.00014924465,0.00006026243,0.00013748293,0.00021477124,0.00055418664],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019925737,0.0000884791,0.00024265266,0.00009982397,0.0013302958,0.0000758843,0.00039670974,0.000015192906,0.00012781219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003577307,0.00007063595,0.00007426202,0.0044114483,0.017806752,0.0002275121,0.00011336193,0.00008819267,0.0015683975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.844224e-7,0.000010754713,0.0008567411,0.000020096417,0.0000024944059,0.0000034851635,0.0000467459,8.037458e-8,0.00000953689,0.96736944,0.0014244566,0.030255804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005463531,0.000044900495,0.015293453,0.0005848465,0.000039110328,0.000004828399,0.0015810862,0.000008993591,0.000008801051,0.0700343,0.912092,0.00025307498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009740481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025209438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9725408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029092273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016743375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388416911","doi":"10.1093/law/9780192870520.003.0002","title":"The Constitutionalization of Conflicts Within the UK","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Phenomenon; Phrase; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Epistemology; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05740961253823524,"score_gpt":0.25932051553838986,"score_spread":0.20191090300015463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388416911","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000025873656,0.0003594725,0.0003244675,0.00016172827,0.00034164012,0.00030800875,0.000049201415,0.00002657126,0.998403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03442519,0.0010595362,0.000020389249,0.00010652792,0.00020232223,6.1510843e-7,0.000008521243,0.0000055200594,0.96417135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990339,0.00004534432,0.00015927629,0.00014171533,0.00046790688,0.00015180312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891794,0.00029065288,0.00027055497,0.00014518824,0.00032706387,0.00004859076],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042705899,0.00012334755,0.00015005149,0.000036337697,0.002249145,0.000028535658,0.00040986176,0.00017081085,0.000021416761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051807838,0.0000867,0.00010829383,0.000014350023,0.0045903726,0.000033894183,0.00013703211,0.0001857642,9.2636225e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003942663,0.0000023076643,0.000020391511,0.000002957442,0.000097416785,0.000005782273,0.00096297055,0.000008668595,6.180054e-7,0.9975717,0.0006247795,0.00066299137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010502821,0.000009569862,0.000020892445,0.00005133695,0.00008525089,7.3027127e-7,0.0006366421,0.0000016654485,0.000009133232,0.02210772,0.9768698,0.0001021972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024047766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005360166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97624505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010788563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041787096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388433419","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199535415.003.0001","title":"Bridging comparative politics and comparative constitutional law: Constitutional design in divided societies","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law; Autonomy; Constitutional law; Ethnic group","score_opus":0.1883365849591741,"score_gpt":0.3349527442980406,"score_spread":0.14661615933886651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388433419","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007639287,0.0037636398,0.0050715264,0.0011527946,0.00030369073,0.0006005103,0.00018997336,0.0000842154,0.98875725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91221803,0.0024747252,0.0010907034,0.001201757,0.0005595799,0.00003749151,0.00006575884,0.0000061740425,0.08234578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99766636,0.00013135538,0.0004898514,0.0004667263,0.0007834167,0.00046227832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983971,0.0007741128,0.00018641078,0.000087026085,0.00037684542,0.00017847662],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035439993,0.00040375828,0.0007829063,0.00013548388,0.0025103851,0.00008823656,0.00018040535,0.00030737452,0.00036221292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049219867,0.0004011661,0.00013889119,0.000068691574,0.04907826,0.00025946862,0.0001312503,0.0004638586,0.00011368226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017813105,0.000030526244,0.00015072337,0.000005618096,0.00014867145,0.000029119825,0.0039150487,0.00009488963,0.0000012420772,0.97826344,0.01731389,0.000029039571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006894835,0.000047481182,0.0002813398,0.00032244602,0.00007448875,0.000037696514,0.0025682587,0.00005954517,0.000014574771,0.4326112,0.5624684,0.0008250823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002585506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028783418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9121416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004595607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021458026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388665567","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4603889","title":"Is Judicial Review Fit for Purpose?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Canada West","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.05165554099753812,"score_gpt":0.35813677547569744,"score_spread":0.30648123447815934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388665567","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020816363,0.39463475,0.004556614,0.4076072,0.004527117,0.0028232213,0.000077058976,0.00064111804,0.16431656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44776577,0.5392515,0.000021426553,0.0032606206,0.002739662,0.000057571662,0.0000042517668,0.000012572845,0.0068866145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975206,0.000062437226,0.00020308082,0.00013455884,0.0003736548,0.0017056335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995305,0.00009020964,0.000088583445,0.000053497482,0.00016473146,0.00007248292],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026259546,0.00008519692,0.00018128003,0.00005737022,0.0016010709,0.000034721605,0.0002363702,0.000048378533,0.000093352835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039465632,0.000075061966,0.00018434798,0.00047498682,0.00018239254,0.000117113006,0.00002850373,0.00044365498,0.00024602987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011445499,0.000013562459,0.00029451697,0.000012719195,0.00008330941,0.0000015251203,0.00039724202,6.1603896e-7,0.000004876419,0.9215211,0.038254917,0.03940417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012097455,0.000048901984,0.00014204823,0.00009131509,0.00003685976,0.0000068540535,0.0013108437,0.0000013125147,0.0000018018181,0.55360246,0.44455993,0.000076683245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007792017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058999853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42694938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004403802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030788071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388823179","doi":"10.4337/9781800378346.00005","title":"Introduction to the Research Handbook on Law and Political Systems","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Legislation; Politics; Legislature; Political science; Institution; Law; Executive branch; Law and economics; Political system; Sociology","score_opus":0.0941911047917499,"score_gpt":0.3305717902294218,"score_spread":0.23638068543767188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388823179","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001292045,0.00032508303,0.00000919806,0.058219813,0.0030216316,0.000585946,0.000036019723,0.00016912537,0.9376203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024159176,0.00007498947,0.000011361365,0.0016899979,0.028845482,0.000102614256,0.000015572805,0.000047202477,0.9450536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996774,0.00022164683,0.00025706607,0.000527873,0.0015490922,0.000670311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981582,0.0006940382,0.000061082465,0.0002880527,0.0005175611,0.00028104542],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036538586,0.0001964833,0.00027408442,0.00021510648,0.002876678,0.0022456197,0.00047347855,0.0003337246,0.000033479006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014226065,0.00014820119,0.00007685957,0.00006866883,0.0016044007,0.00020235548,0.00036065356,0.0010605733,0.0006148709],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010901269,0.0000029994574,0.0000012231818,0.000007701611,0.00003904743,0.000006197686,0.0013102406,0.0000011287783,6.745253e-7,0.7942707,0.20325626,0.0010929271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004132488,0.000043701657,0.000009085906,0.00018593167,0.000014269582,0.0000016522305,0.00081579643,5.433399e-7,0.0000015578969,0.19663037,0.8021183,0.00013746109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019571804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012228244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59886205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003728426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037771784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99879014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388865469","doi":"10.1515/zfrs-2023-1016","title":"Hubert Treiber and the <b> <i>Sociology of Law</i> </b> of Max Weber: From the Ideal Types of Legal Rationality to the Plurality of Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Sociology of law; Empirical legal studies; Legal realism; Law; Sociology; Legal pluralism; Legal profession; Pluralism (philosophy); Jurisprudence; State (computer science); Ideal (ethics); Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06732455426831413,"score_gpt":0.3534023753903444,"score_spread":0.2860778211220303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388865469","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.728088,0.003266734,0.0000322528,0.065727696,0.00055922265,0.00080366473,0.0006039003,0.00005297946,0.2008655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983844,0.00045768873,0.000045102206,0.00081172946,0.00016066611,0.000027311846,0.000013200992,0.0000034815996,0.00009637774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790484,0.00088604854,0.00046368263,0.00019106995,0.0003411157,0.0002132284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953866,0.0038185911,0.00026326664,0.00024024305,0.00026206273,0.000029251945],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002474471,0.00010982077,0.0004296591,0.000015488362,0.00047376793,0.0000079529955,0.00048161132,0.00012881368,0.000044848362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012764618,0.000051275125,0.00014320754,0.00024192994,0.007978638,0.00006484074,0.00026084745,0.00016037628,0.000009202512],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016838379,0.000021367994,0.0042659943,0.000005938889,0.000111851085,3.3869046e-7,0.004904125,0.000036413767,0.0005984828,0.98779786,0.0017880106,0.00030125838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011817899,0.00019360676,0.120689735,0.000081633305,0.00023266101,9.762881e-7,0.0077825817,0.000013256019,0.0072562504,0.3638979,0.49841923,0.00025040278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14014098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023075867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62389994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006620152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017759585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99475044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388877431","doi":"10.5040/9781509953639","title":"Constitutional Courts, Media and Public Opinion","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Supreme court; Public opinion; Politics; Legitimacy","score_opus":0.07718578439243645,"score_gpt":0.28850049768596153,"score_spread":0.21131471329352508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388877431","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000125033985,0.0011427801,0.000043778313,0.008609557,0.004061138,0.00027001844,0.00026374,0.00044176492,0.98515475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017901842,0.0011539196,0.00010471218,0.0016261957,0.01085985,0.000115661096,0.0007996124,0.000042538763,0.96739566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99738246,0.00010752796,0.0003292622,0.0004744248,0.0011664769,0.0005398688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982188,0.0006586943,0.00019329003,0.00015507801,0.00044896826,0.00032516854],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012192519,0.0002592833,0.00036592508,0.00018168941,0.0019701142,0.0021048398,0.00043443067,0.0005143243,0.00016575152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023414139,0.0002616813,0.00011579486,0.00008085964,0.0052499077,0.0008647176,0.00033495066,0.00062240224,0.00019975165],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020497846,0.000004476985,0.00006035249,0.000009300149,0.000045708093,0.000008557796,0.00069832674,6.381223e-8,2.9915213e-7,0.67366093,0.32191497,0.0035949287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012084076,0.0000053051517,0.000099283745,0.00014769277,0.000018260644,0.0000030859633,0.0003658436,6.0600433e-7,1.6441807e-7,0.24191497,0.75709575,0.00022817944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013746438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047156676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43518078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003466696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003832102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388919582","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4613080","title":"The Inaccessibility of Justice in Ontario’s Adjudicative Tribunals: Symptoms and Diagnosis","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Law","score_opus":0.02409003021726633,"score_gpt":0.31516843341678713,"score_spread":0.29107840319952083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388919582","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9835199,0.005368544,0.000029515286,0.004644606,0.00017285669,0.00012183225,0.0000018067481,0.000013181205,0.0061277607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97091395,0.028625378,0.0000018552719,0.000028037259,0.00008765459,0.000019438905,3.8667875e-7,0.000002089623,0.0003212377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998266,0.00018962302,0.00022844775,0.00011151633,0.0002886586,0.0009157558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990779,0.00059791637,0.000124569,0.00005196695,0.00010423002,0.000043379674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037832109,0.000062129846,0.00013501958,0.000055826727,0.0010817789,0.000032231183,0.0002050003,0.00003941917,0.000012041155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007556669,0.000043267733,0.000044506425,0.0004493778,0.00062076846,0.00012880632,0.000056612003,0.00067317236,0.0000054235293],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029749026,0.000027000424,0.3105422,0.0000014160465,0.000055773973,9.4225044e-7,0.0032791283,0.0000042491797,0.0000016798435,0.6695809,0.00006641268,0.016410572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001790242,0.0000560755,0.37666753,0.000019921543,0.00003033525,0.0000019698546,0.019791715,0.0000017100422,0.0000040096816,0.5996207,0.0035766372,0.000050349605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14395615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91108316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.767127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092030555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034355219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86174434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389136120","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4616700","title":"15 Why Law Was Late to Comparative Constitutional Amendment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Amendment; Constitutional law; Political science; First amendment; Supreme court","score_opus":0.04329779320689511,"score_gpt":0.33237400512678833,"score_spread":0.2890762119198932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389136120","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2807833,0.0034713272,0.007554772,0.07326583,0.002426643,0.0007678601,0.000043674718,0.00038984334,0.63129675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99464434,0.0014559982,0.000025053027,0.0012890777,0.0006187572,0.000015237268,0.0000041905832,0.0000032507164,0.0019440865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973055,0.00011581563,0.00019766547,0.00016577497,0.0005546719,0.0016605584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994883,0.000082511346,0.00006404683,0.0000508088,0.00015898517,0.00015538275],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013765589,0.000110891364,0.00017624424,0.00008752175,0.002199596,0.00007807027,0.00021749332,0.00004349648,0.00010435029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005333676,0.000098914985,0.00008910532,0.0005038665,0.0010472212,0.00016548127,0.000058344198,0.0005717406,0.00090237276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002277548,0.000024650943,0.00029911668,3.992954e-7,0.00010793369,0.000005862895,0.0017974152,0.00021361497,0.000062786654,0.9933,0.0037354324,0.00042998148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021796765,0.00008575488,0.00020560018,0.000016012158,0.000016762619,0.00001264794,0.010244287,0.000004362807,0.0000246498,0.6657341,0.32330114,0.00013671436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026377242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036708713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71386105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010167371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002709407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389241932","doi":"10.4000/bresils.15641","title":"Entre peanut butter et pé-de-moleque : incursions comparatives dans les modalités de décision à la majorité de la Cour suprême des États-Unis et du Tribunal fédéral suprême du Brésil","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Brésil(s)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Tribunal; Philosophy; Art; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03826113989243637,"score_gpt":0.33700064024129767,"score_spread":0.2987395003488613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389241932","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88025784,0.0028194063,0.0039087483,0.04808546,0.00057717477,0.0003350222,0.00061758264,0.00026726455,0.06313151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874134,0.0052613956,0.00070939393,0.00091039063,0.0009466117,0.00007527229,0.00008184862,0.000036430556,0.004565247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934111,0.0034076665,0.00054326525,0.00058732793,0.0007914638,0.0012591714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99632835,0.0025547517,0.00017594745,0.00021660104,0.00026489416,0.00045945356],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003145092,0.0004901381,0.0005987259,0.00016585548,0.003978185,0.00033965395,0.0006305465,0.00045760704,0.0003987409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008289854,0.00048536627,0.00037342854,0.0009718227,0.006065743,0.0005240119,0.00042461758,0.0007293829,0.00029047873],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012042664,0.0005332659,0.16910696,0.00004686283,0.0002034506,0.0004415063,0.07938748,0.0013020015,0.0014246983,0.72034883,0.024365954,0.0027185706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014572834,0.00016417728,0.39419913,0.00057082623,0.00025242352,0.00021654493,0.047494978,0.0019364139,0.0004313317,0.2588473,0.2935457,0.0008838958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057321157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022963291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46150154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006706195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015401238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389332845","doi":"10.7202/1107319ar","title":"L’AVÈNEMENT DU CONSTITUTIONNALISME EN OCCIDENT : FONDEMENTS PHILOSOPHIQUES ET CONTINGENCE HISTORIQUE","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04301885085924121,"score_gpt":0.24834310931287926,"score_spread":0.20532425845363805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389332845","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.092686966,0.016210617,0.0058445367,0.026779953,0.0019746497,0.00055773306,0.00006254679,0.0001637209,0.85571927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96627957,0.010806125,0.0010428482,0.0020949834,0.001061378,0.000013990833,0.00000881112,0.000014741001,0.018677555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980038,0.00032189718,0.00031307735,0.00041010772,0.00032463614,0.00062651857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899465,0.00010699574,0.00020524404,0.00017907399,0.00021324054,0.0003007676],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008192819,0.00025308086,0.0003256689,0.00009576973,0.0010545,0.000028822957,0.0004591696,0.00025123786,0.0012085462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000120692595,0.00034012532,0.00021675714,0.00024849523,0.0012231469,0.0003534801,0.00027329463,0.00027041344,0.0001925454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059552734,0.00019754416,0.029288191,0.00005581427,0.00020769611,0.00041929446,0.019974915,0.000028281713,0.00015015181,0.9450882,0.003604216,0.000926129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005502346,0.00012540315,0.013816305,0.00052926183,0.00029654108,0.000059418162,0.0020337533,0.000041285562,0.00032135754,0.12369307,0.8580652,0.00046819856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023172578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011106113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8735926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007733541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006897786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389355427","doi":"10.7202/1105804ar","title":"LA PERTINENCE EN CONTEXTE CANADIEN DE LA JURISPRUDENCE CONSTITUTIONNELLE DU CONSEIL PRIVÉ RELATIVE À L’INDÉPENDANCE JUDICIAIRE","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010352107094561311,"score_gpt":0.22781976247134508,"score_spread":0.21746765537678378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389355427","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3118893,0.017692126,0.0057726656,0.010758434,0.0006143962,0.000349574,0.0001219577,0.00011411643,0.65268743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9700115,0.005354241,0.0006261294,0.0004403077,0.00046225137,0.000009408976,0.000005967553,0.000016089612,0.02307413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970897,0.000983368,0.00028685437,0.0004666762,0.00033921128,0.00083417795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99753296,0.0010965677,0.00020458108,0.00019628063,0.00030005217,0.00066958315],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016961498,0.00028508206,0.00039765897,0.00008554521,0.0015726876,0.00005969991,0.0005560437,0.00047108042,0.00013867817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012676799,0.0003713255,0.00017376286,0.00053332926,0.005638991,0.00043613068,0.0002496034,0.0005832757,0.00017747712],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103114915,0.000097784316,0.037999507,0.00005074302,0.00015493813,0.0017684248,0.040587027,0.00068798405,0.00007105522,0.9115467,0.004481114,0.0024516203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011335282,0.000114523245,0.01347815,0.0011483617,0.00024019086,0.00085056823,0.014173256,0.0006419565,0.000089959074,0.061392784,0.9061752,0.0005615035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08229628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045147277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9016941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008893752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049368306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389510901","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-30844-4_9","title":"Common Law Systems and COVID-19 Policy Response: Protective Public Health Policy in the United States, Canada, New Zealand, and Australia","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Law; Common law; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Public administration; Geography; Medicine","score_opus":0.1326050488057124,"score_gpt":0.3749535822558368,"score_spread":0.24234853345012441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389510901","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00083021633,0.000937657,0.000011263439,0.83819276,0.00018636994,0.0025216113,0.00081908755,0.000117571806,0.15638344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22623749,0.002762867,0.0000034062718,0.022515766,0.0010119181,0.0000856184,0.00013646788,0.00002835982,0.74721813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978402,0.0005253172,0.00030963554,0.00028944484,0.00055478053,0.00048059397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844575,0.0007120252,0.00016365688,0.00012529496,0.000071257826,0.00048203708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016416139,0.00022271185,0.0003784487,0.0003483561,0.0012650912,0.00018971911,0.0002146057,0.00016526987,0.000014740439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039733536,0.00016289366,0.00002594652,0.0004338849,0.001046349,0.00006428213,0.00009988468,0.0003332707,0.000005299148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004513828,0.0000038014718,0.00023232265,0.00002284472,0.000040136823,0.000019875126,0.0065269945,0.0000070984647,2.4651682e-8,0.95613945,0.036816597,0.00014573368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020124478,0.00005401876,0.0017318845,0.000054577868,0.000005596547,0.000006221735,0.005040694,0.0000016082438,8.3701615e-9,0.12311147,0.86963266,0.00015998242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9998836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99946064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83302796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015479086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014879913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9907048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389692223","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4657352","title":"Legislative Measures and Legislators' Motives","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.023490523188233938,"score_gpt":0.29270822514453027,"score_spread":0.26921770195629635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389692223","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5574818,0.02321692,0.0022423102,0.024315998,0.0011568202,0.0003433225,0.0000075908233,0.00035373462,0.39088148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9747936,0.021689206,0.000006896898,0.000053276257,0.0006024309,0.0000035604037,4.513088e-7,0.0000047981553,0.0028457525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979674,0.00012563517,0.00011446919,0.00012274079,0.00035946615,0.0013102889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996485,0.0000908381,0.00005602107,0.000033988414,0.00009700347,0.00007365175],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018138107,0.00008054614,0.00011522464,0.000089241206,0.0015613801,0.00006274129,0.000119882076,0.000044415276,0.000011528947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002839224,0.00006833364,0.000053143784,0.0003530593,0.0005060314,0.00022626686,0.00003558565,0.00055206986,0.000053196723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008394175,0.000007492516,0.008497811,3.461597e-7,0.000090663794,0.0000028088305,0.005387769,0.0000033118051,0.000019028761,0.96864253,0.00025078337,0.017089033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016717002,0.00005643284,0.00919152,0.000010450832,0.000016839222,0.000014435212,0.02492177,0.000002969852,0.0000046660443,0.89361465,0.07189095,0.000108152744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026572682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023451203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4173118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027736565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017146211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389819517","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-6519-1_106","title":"Institutionalism: Legal","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; New institutionalism; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.06895375766515942,"score_gpt":0.3034887738905027,"score_spread":0.23453501622534328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389819517","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000015061319,0.0002497982,0.000025266529,0.0046952954,0.0012392247,0.00012134462,0.000036783855,0.00028595317,0.99334484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0028373366,0.0011001596,0.000031421085,0.0005418728,0.0015743077,0.0000074724926,0.00002209469,0.000010623074,0.9938747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989076,0.000008359193,0.00014975495,0.00019838566,0.0005502258,0.00018562308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960136,0.00006927822,0.00004956378,0.0000735576,0.00013057912,0.00007567923],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018507919,0.0001308481,0.00017599418,0.00007088533,0.0009512645,0.00004691472,0.00016718004,0.00020134983,0.0021349415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007347859,0.00012114894,0.0001256017,0.000041575993,0.0011488962,0.000086113454,0.00008062909,0.00016150963,0.005452308],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001641681,0.0000025113661,0.000003946221,0.0000013174486,0.000042463707,0.00002511182,0.0000958499,7.303663e-7,1.0228068e-7,0.9572545,0.04128849,0.0012833172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021578438,0.0000028807685,0.000015927184,0.000021947657,0.000012578755,3.99232e-7,0.00005444328,7.303581e-8,9.904126e-8,0.38536942,0.6143995,0.00010116932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008572428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020167558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.573111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011484773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007112233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389879431","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192871787.013.11","title":"Judicial System","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Jurisdiction; Politics; Supreme court; Law; Context (archaeology); Judicial independence; Judicial activism; Judicial review; Geography","score_opus":0.04804259489002626,"score_gpt":0.2346829427959428,"score_spread":0.18664034790591652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389879431","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000096829735,0.000057994155,0.000033171957,0.00007958752,0.00085490977,0.00026990852,0.0001237569,0.0004518264,0.9981192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0042025815,0.0004522758,0.000012981561,0.000026790074,0.00073240476,8.1540054e-7,0.00000997521,0.000018554549,0.9945436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877685,0.000037310125,0.00012553626,0.00029474427,0.00048004647,0.00028549932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993724,0.000081357844,0.00013108432,0.00014379903,0.00014763021,0.00012373348],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015809172,0.00019137259,0.00029540487,0.000106747204,0.0014019539,0.00003670855,0.00038980047,0.00032359565,0.000024289951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014179633,0.00022570357,0.00018866836,0.000013967464,0.00083491835,0.000053334035,0.00026607563,0.00024075537,0.000024744388],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024526871,0.0000020936195,0.0000030066033,0.000015654297,0.00011391829,0.0001502627,0.0005236553,8.7652273e-7,2.520314e-7,0.99329996,0.0040588854,0.0018068842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012733917,0.000013399558,0.000007867123,0.0001670119,0.0001330234,6.747843e-7,0.00097377296,0.0000011144381,7.678875e-7,0.00839863,0.98993707,0.00023931799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050612986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002692893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98587817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035950885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003202389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389915095","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192898579.013.14","title":"Network Analysis for the Comparative Study of Judicial Behaviour","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Social network analysis; Normative; Set (abstract data type); Network analysis; Social network (sociolinguistics); Core (optical fiber); Data science; Computer science; Political science; Law; Social media; Engineering","score_opus":0.11123635738113133,"score_gpt":0.2965150058964228,"score_spread":0.1852786485152915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389915095","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006027883,0.0000704779,0.00027898364,0.00004721052,0.00028834166,0.0010281744,0.00017200502,0.000052647247,0.99745935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30720228,0.00012468359,0.000013315857,0.0000146601005,0.0003681647,0.0000056691056,0.000012289766,0.000008231417,0.6922507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989386,0.000058183363,0.00016749029,0.00024144229,0.00038337847,0.00021087518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883693,0.00043732376,0.00024998718,0.00016053974,0.00026702907,0.00004817312],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025648114,0.00015849968,0.00046802935,0.00009881928,0.0016412116,0.000020261232,0.000438551,0.00013403028,0.000012587101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010127762,0.0001408948,0.0002970271,0.000061039325,0.0007642945,0.000029854953,0.00021590725,0.0001606847,4.6005854e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010822726,0.000025705926,0.0005413444,0.0000022930117,0.002288691,0.000006823499,0.0063245883,0.00035369632,3.107094e-8,0.98810303,0.0019052449,0.00034032387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037866333,0.00013996298,0.0019346758,0.000023907618,0.0057609575,3.9715204e-8,0.015066176,0.000018229774,2.4701382e-7,0.009591627,0.9668589,0.0002265632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009236619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039413437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9785114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007181389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013437317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389922831","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192898579.013.3","title":"The Global Expansion of Judicial Power","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Judicial activism; Political science; Power (physics); Law; Discipline; Judicial review; Resistance (ecology); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.034436612911094566,"score_gpt":0.2476385852270863,"score_spread":0.21320197231599172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389922831","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007944274,0.00011623593,0.000018729397,0.00015509476,0.0006088143,0.00019891473,0.00014635913,0.00007653266,0.9985999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0147753125,0.0016372714,0.0000092421005,0.000027659877,0.00019965746,4.725541e-7,0.00000420987,0.000008590774,0.9833376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989459,0.000037046862,0.00012800307,0.00018735304,0.00048514013,0.00021655766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993278,0.00012259618,0.00015570689,0.00014310324,0.00018226457,0.00006857014],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017132095,0.00013647343,0.00020464955,0.000029184766,0.001388808,0.000021338908,0.0004198405,0.00020827346,0.000015459766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032688153,0.000121127814,0.0001729864,0.000017206588,0.0015629305,0.000037960664,0.00030325598,0.00014607662,0.0000034871487],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056894976,0.000002286442,0.000013251716,0.0000025466977,0.00008681122,0.000019621482,0.0003897015,6.298931e-7,4.1333857e-7,0.99404514,0.0020615195,0.003321184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009971816,0.000021732667,0.000058064255,0.00005673419,0.00006413342,2.0661847e-7,0.0006693684,2.4929068e-7,0.0000017739932,0.06786464,0.9310439,0.000119455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034558238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038980618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9289824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017514788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036267703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389989499","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4670775","title":"Legislative Measures and Legislators' Motives","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.023490523188233938,"score_gpt":0.29270822514453027,"score_spread":0.26921770195629635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389989499","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5574818,0.02321692,0.0022423102,0.024315998,0.0011568202,0.0003433225,0.0000075908233,0.00035373462,0.39088148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9747936,0.021689206,0.000006896898,0.000053276257,0.0006024309,0.0000035604037,4.513088e-7,0.0000047981553,0.0028457525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979674,0.00012563517,0.00011446919,0.00012274079,0.00035946615,0.0013102889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996485,0.0000908381,0.00005602107,0.000033988414,0.00009700347,0.00007365175],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018138107,0.00008054614,0.00011522464,0.000089241206,0.0015613801,0.00006274129,0.000119882076,0.000044415276,0.000011528947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002839224,0.00006833364,0.000053143784,0.0003530593,0.0005060314,0.00022626686,0.00003558565,0.00055206986,0.000053196723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008394175,0.000007492516,0.008497811,3.461597e-7,0.000090663794,0.0000028088305,0.005387769,0.0000033118051,0.000019028761,0.96864253,0.00025078337,0.017089033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016717002,0.00005643284,0.00919152,0.000010450832,0.000016839222,0.000014435212,0.02492177,0.000002969852,0.0000046660443,0.89361465,0.07189095,0.000108152744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026572682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023451203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4173118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027736565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017146211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390284047","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-45347-2","title":"Against Post-Liberal Courts and Justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Palgrave studies in classical liberalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"York University; University of Ontario Institute of Technology","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0858273650546957,"score_gpt":0.3666476304423585,"score_spread":0.2808202653876628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390284047","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010238927,0.011442293,0.000002118575,0.019082403,0.0048361523,0.0006518171,0.00021095856,0.00029703885,0.9624533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027813356,0.048304714,0.00013284174,0.0055699726,0.0068524424,0.00021721868,0.00012267093,0.000101503356,0.9108853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99668473,0.00023037745,0.0005952239,0.00075528293,0.00091774325,0.00081665517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99715316,0.0018105255,0.00020216376,0.00020258526,0.00040722877,0.00022434133],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000685809,0.00050586456,0.0010045719,0.00022249218,0.0013208165,0.00009565642,0.00034204734,0.0005132856,0.000022850194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013993306,0.00046119178,0.00020635972,0.00022979309,0.005118196,0.00006242177,0.00062815764,0.0008558103,0.00019930537],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027608181,0.000020219126,0.00006139942,0.0001166838,0.00032694696,0.00029563365,0.010501333,0.0000021070275,0.0000011130163,0.8625274,0.122248456,0.0038711068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033268947,0.000047452897,0.00076986785,0.00056313304,0.00020648653,0.0000017933905,0.0025594458,0.0000040056593,2.523715e-7,0.6259127,0.36906573,0.0005364295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004327975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006534366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24681728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062350096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006625453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390284071","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-45347-2_3","title":"Securing Constitutional Democracy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave studies in classical liberalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; General partnership; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.1248713589527326,"score_gpt":0.36578618646514993,"score_spread":0.24091482751241733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390284071","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003533426,0.0040728934,0.00001864199,0.013355561,0.0033985786,0.0004133607,0.00011819353,0.00027209905,0.97831535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24558435,0.028998958,0.00025639727,0.0017244276,0.0066453,0.00016557836,0.000078515164,0.000085368105,0.7164611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99685633,0.000090227346,0.00065076776,0.00067377766,0.001041118,0.0006877741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784535,0.0012618809,0.00020695144,0.000196991,0.00031560383,0.00017320385],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059784367,0.000464761,0.0008602631,0.0002475832,0.0015549322,0.000057967536,0.00037250886,0.00046230422,0.00019017226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00084888807,0.00044234507,0.00032234908,0.00018789935,0.011891931,0.00005853033,0.00049231265,0.0008416953,0.0008339775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013884509,0.000010150511,0.0001346818,0.00002539215,0.00031173634,0.00033478232,0.002618536,0.0000046289547,3.923692e-7,0.9852772,0.010169134,0.0010994998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001827219,0.000013624091,0.00013653704,0.00044157958,0.000051905547,0.0000028706193,0.0005469085,0.0000013182616,4.2203726e-7,0.67532176,0.3229447,0.0003556166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033439728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004088778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31277558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005975929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005162253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390504654","doi":"10.54254/2753-7048/35/20232078","title":"Voting Procedure of President Election","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Voting; Political science; Focus (optics); General election; Voting behavior; Public relations; Public administration; Public economics; Political economy; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.02349087201682615,"score_gpt":0.36130965840524704,"score_spread":0.3378187863884209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390504654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73547107,0.06829713,0.007601585,0.1292806,0.010224285,0.0004964311,0.000005072683,0.00014159486,0.04848224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99762267,0.00090315915,0.00012470524,0.0006913247,0.00060721714,0.000028110378,0.0000052632354,0.0000024226958,0.000015143686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939483,0.000082920575,0.00012734938,0.00015795513,0.00010541858,0.00013152104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953,0.00029506636,0.000030424932,0.000036156693,0.00006936479,0.000038975322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032491313,0.00005024073,0.000076650314,0.0001431748,0.00014155998,0.000026512484,0.000058300517,0.00010852732,0.000117002106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001328221,0.00004409705,0.000016637874,0.00046294482,0.00029020864,0.00010274076,0.000008084438,0.00014323548,0.0000048613224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011447847,0.00013815856,0.116984546,0.000043879318,0.000026833572,8.1120567e-7,0.021994624,0.0000032442733,0.00015529283,0.44355303,0.0022467033,0.41484144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016650927,0.000047996058,0.29537174,0.00018386284,0.00002582422,0.000016059143,0.0021062745,0.00002711859,0.00012666488,0.57945174,0.12227257,0.00020363087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00081505365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069247847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4146378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026206406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053699117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38641924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390519823","doi":"10.1163/22134514-bja10066","title":"Rule by Metrics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University; Harvard University; Brigham Young University; University of Toronto; Yale University","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Argument (complex analysis); Task (project management); Order (exchange); Intervention (counseling); Data science; Computer science; Management science; Political science; Law; Business; Psychology; Economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05201412681779061,"score_gpt":0.3097679852978599,"score_spread":0.2577538584800693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390519823","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27035707,0.005960217,0.00024168946,0.0028313843,0.00037729152,0.000040769402,0.000021825503,0.000019335375,0.7201504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99621654,0.0020139106,0.000056361525,0.00034689033,0.00024712895,1.8246634e-7,3.5913766e-7,0.000002381388,0.0011162522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999149,0.00021231454,0.00016431989,0.000059785616,0.0002953172,0.00011922572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947935,0.00011690302,0.00018474109,0.000026026652,0.00012379918,0.000069159134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006644061,0.000052913107,0.0001399944,0.000015004142,0.00041361776,0.00004040691,0.00012756948,0.0000069449493,0.000018484252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050004783,0.00004255218,0.000038132952,0.00028785423,0.00043082336,0.00015618776,0.000033318935,0.000091344824,0.000072219686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000187739,0.000018854576,0.0010673256,0.0000011999495,0.00003345549,0.000043174095,0.002760735,0.00000732171,0.00008405147,0.9073732,0.087315805,0.0012761278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019808495,0.000053999825,0.020894716,0.000024035387,0.000007669866,0.0000024525052,0.00082500826,0.0000022249912,0.00006229198,0.0066935867,0.9711733,0.00006262255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017481358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010895223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9006796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020436899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035472818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31812552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390817485","doi":"10.1017/lsi.2023.82","title":"A Fair Process Matters: The Relationship between Public Participation and Constitutional Legitimacy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Social Inquiry","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Georg-August-Universität Göttingen","keywords":"Constitution; Legitimacy; Public participation; Political science; Process (computing); Law; Public relations; Public administration; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.2305964696203343,"score_gpt":0.42481747096253486,"score_spread":0.19422100134220055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390817485","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42051122,0.0034944448,0.0058770054,0.3925658,0.0024980975,0.0010449013,0.00010950506,0.00076061033,0.17313844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99582237,0.000016750186,0.000010086615,0.0014062311,0.0025314896,0.00009213611,0.000016618837,0.0000043729315,0.00009993372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988767,0.00015026562,0.00017338843,0.00018706532,0.00036015522,0.0002524145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991074,0.0006554963,0.0000379469,0.00004111104,0.0000944156,0.00006361882],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048763043,0.00008861279,0.000109017485,0.000021352222,0.0033625148,0.0003685758,0.00011560165,0.00008396687,0.00005129728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002342035,0.000069845235,0.0000535998,0.0003465429,0.011187696,0.00055496395,0.000043313063,0.00017229926,0.00007327166],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021717779,0.000010254544,0.032633755,0.000011293293,0.00003078128,0.0000019671268,0.0154222725,4.9775537e-7,8.299265e-7,0.9488677,0.0021747663,0.0008437034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011308049,0.000010719089,0.090217434,0.00004824449,0.00007339542,9.722153e-7,0.009420835,0.0000053648046,0.0000022604404,0.68122965,0.21870266,0.00017535996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006830217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007727555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5753112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008468029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034531933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390868163","doi":"","title":"Les rapports entre Cours suprêmes et législateurs dans les systèmes constitutionnels de Common Law : recherches comparées sur la troisième voie du constitutionnalisme et la protection renouvelée des droits et libertés Etats-Unis, Canada, Royaume-Uni","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"book","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.040679737193915155,"score_gpt":0.26798917446793175,"score_spread":0.2273094372740166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390868163","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1113809,0.004944154,0.021632921,0.032985333,0.00074552593,0.0017187815,0.0009299068,0.0004389691,0.8252235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9455196,0.0051732063,0.0017585028,0.00051068707,0.00008394358,0.00015654192,0.00079548795,0.00006990917,0.04593212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9681644,0.027342724,0.0011793729,0.0011133433,0.0012378244,0.00096234644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98594266,0.00863681,0.0011725597,0.00090047484,0.0028862534,0.0004612573],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013733686,0.0009419303,0.0012202957,0.00022797119,0.004404737,0.0007782671,0.0012920967,0.00095293147,0.00014472866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023845953,0.0010088795,0.00044670337,0.0007003592,0.01225814,0.00081839785,0.0005326913,0.001650166,0.000030089586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046740402,0.0005338273,0.010784174,0.00022680055,0.00038864277,0.000056172994,0.0314384,0.0006526655,0.0001685301,0.9475866,0.0028734643,0.0052440106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00234394,0.000011805573,0.024843086,0.01337469,0.0008158624,0.0003771431,0.011640971,0.0013682503,0.0021525417,0.119500495,0.8209712,0.0026000366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8566104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9517388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8341387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024425539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014932791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99923617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390983043","doi":"10.51644/9781771123563-005","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada and the Convention","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Convention; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.021949386201766015,"score_gpt":0.24080677384176194,"score_spread":0.21885738763999593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390983043","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005589003,0.001246818,0.000005073749,0.0070138727,0.00034611273,0.00012808581,0.000008228998,0.000004238042,0.9911917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11343375,0.002160315,0.0000022569268,0.00024929282,0.00037121205,0.0000034271443,0.0000010188464,0.0000025142992,0.88377625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994291,0.000020500607,0.000106468506,0.0000627264,0.00029890845,0.000082288985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994779,0.00022788507,0.00007658113,0.00005280935,0.00014488219,0.000019906247],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000411597,0.000052865194,0.00010163101,0.0000043987657,0.0010432035,0.000016057707,0.00010560003,0.00004109741,0.000430921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060773342,0.000024970723,0.000034994035,0.000008458356,0.0032148657,0.000012543392,0.000039787064,0.000049458464,0.0000045870684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008721401,4.063473e-7,0.000015503765,8.0719633e-7,0.000037826347,1.7694988e-7,0.00024772625,1.1650144e-8,5.0174854e-8,0.9690847,0.030224686,0.0003793827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005433117,0.0000031367797,0.000058080073,0.000010714136,0.000016442435,1.1961443e-7,0.00048142602,3.2941406e-7,5.0299604e-7,0.32181832,0.677529,0.000027639642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8613662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9931816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64730424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038597736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061697676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99949783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390999199","doi":"10.51644/9781771122757-004","title":"Rights Inflation in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inflation (cosmology); Political science; Theoretical physics; Physics","score_opus":0.02254676550850239,"score_gpt":0.24362320053032654,"score_spread":0.22107643502182417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390999199","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029408184,0.00011999272,0.0000024459096,0.0005130593,0.00036170773,0.00008312843,0.000005174476,0.000010855353,0.99860954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25385407,0.00010741646,0.000014914475,0.00027356602,0.00077147875,0.000002727257,0.000005947304,0.0000031615584,0.7449667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993905,0.0000068672553,0.00011244108,0.00010237214,0.00028048307,0.000107356915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997855,0.000035070185,0.000039653663,0.00003752706,0.00006880087,0.00003348389],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007217215,0.0000679801,0.000104151426,0.000029564868,0.00026986242,0.000008492775,0.000071806324,0.00007162081,0.004432336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000124278995,0.000058518133,0.000019031095,0.00001873107,0.00021834685,0.000035974423,0.000019729627,0.00006573841,0.0001763885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011064957,5.7677397e-7,0.00023740088,4.1071306e-7,0.0000064955275,0.0000044520007,0.00021850549,2.582338e-7,2.7762544e-8,0.98719424,0.011873239,0.00046330187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017269103,0.0000015878155,0.00038840043,0.000016743877,0.000002592289,3.875095e-8,0.000061657935,2.498004e-7,2.6203946e-7,0.34215847,0.6572915,0.00006122567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9984753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99998045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6454182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065619894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020975664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391163169","doi":"10.5040/9781509957910.ch-013","title":"Election Law, Judicial Review, and Canadian Democracy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Democracy; Law; Election law; Judicial review; Politics","score_opus":0.015444772832374942,"score_gpt":0.29426365165222423,"score_spread":0.2788188788198493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391163169","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[1.6267064e-7,0.08510356,0.0000025302702,0.0146292355,0.0005470948,0.00020205518,0.000018904515,0.000115070514,0.8993814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017187018,0.05283966,0.000021761445,0.0060695536,0.0014553004,0.000014091281,0.0000052021433,0.00004936264,0.9378264],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937326,0.000030495845,0.00007816062,0.00017639929,0.00014319435,0.00019846584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99977195,0.000008834974,0.0000246762,0.000041203442,0.000025468331,0.00012785803],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013778107,0.000094575356,0.00017315046,0.00007921226,0.00039416555,0.000036617,0.000059651542,0.00012679894,0.0040179496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043281776,0.00008243837,0.0000347795,0.00017264218,0.0003876458,0.000023393177,0.000017453427,0.00010447269,0.0009717346],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.85119e-8,8.6809746e-7,0.0000071152144,0.000024030425,0.000020246594,0.0000023405214,0.000030041658,4.3784865e-10,3.3557328e-8,0.42184797,0.5773969,0.00067030074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011748862,0.0000037619538,0.0000108541135,0.0003257049,0.0001031632,6.699146e-7,0.0000625947,2.2914843e-8,8.674262e-8,0.046054244,0.9533241,0.000103092636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97489953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99576324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3759271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010122422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042023574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998061},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391600269","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1438","title":"The Significance of R. v. Albashir in the Evolution of Constitutional Remedies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.051597291133065964,"score_gpt":0.3273445897171541,"score_spread":0.2757472985840881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391600269","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048658275,0.43150178,0.00015322503,0.07865445,0.0010466538,0.0024444186,0.000083838124,0.00007927379,0.48117054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9241477,0.07533688,0.000009429198,0.0002595135,0.000089657326,0.00006957233,0.0000027765163,0.0000012875493,0.000083147475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854517,0.0002953556,0.00032609128,0.00010050674,0.00055587216,0.00017701556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988822,0.00063212996,0.00012382134,0.00012910146,0.00021518879,0.000017561257],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025754923,0.00006271931,0.00019997687,0.000017689585,0.00059356756,0.0000077406785,0.00032499403,0.000026559755,0.000025304515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007979146,0.000035757865,0.000088210356,0.00069584296,0.004427268,0.000069473965,0.00003941453,0.00007885572,0.000027991966],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031887203,0.000012570082,0.0012109263,0.00010057723,0.000012208402,7.907378e-7,0.00030646686,0.0000032707617,0.000019965502,0.99200547,0.005729883,0.00059465965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007024107,0.000014282295,0.0049856342,0.0011183115,0.000032958134,5.6914615e-7,0.0020943254,0.0000022970353,0.000010710007,0.07625576,0.9153494,0.0000654762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065681343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013915573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9192819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000070268055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041687867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99828213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391719412","doi":"10.21991/cf29463","title":"Ford Focus","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Focus (optics); Computer science; Physics; Optics","score_opus":0.025579660216631994,"score_gpt":0.29700935626768393,"score_spread":0.27142969605105194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391719412","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013121027,0.01621808,0.10681067,0.045188315,0.007906523,0.00082329253,0.00036119157,0.0013688173,0.820011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99471307,0.00072229083,0.00049283763,0.0011373436,0.001066915,0.00016271287,0.000058867907,0.000014129955,0.0016318385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964306,0.00011181206,0.0005866286,0.0007231474,0.0009948745,0.001152979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848247,0.00039759072,0.00008031266,0.0002596051,0.00038778604,0.00039224586],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006484545,0.00038880622,0.0003758907,0.0003750193,0.0045099976,0.00044002593,0.000471877,0.00028288583,0.0010710882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00062401127,0.00037354007,0.00041278696,0.0010217994,0.014536995,0.001224876,0.00019498177,0.00042175702,0.0021071343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026015141,0.00006682202,0.0026379195,0.0000137446505,0.00015391009,0.00011268999,0.00027170862,0.00006834845,0.00005403873,0.96039414,0.027147513,0.009053163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027440937,0.000025836176,0.00010204634,0.00019666727,0.0000618413,0.00008199175,0.0023657167,0.000101933845,0.00005839939,0.2942776,0.7020534,0.00040008363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023258964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032242981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.993401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059668504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046762484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391752890","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2024.2","title":"Defending Dworkin’s One-System Anti-Positivism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Legal positivism; Morality; Opposition (politics); Positivism; Jurisprudence; Epistemology; Politics; Law; Sociology; Philosophy of law; Philosophy; Law and economics; Political science; Comparative law","score_opus":0.039561452306466155,"score_gpt":0.2970963619715947,"score_spread":0.2575349096651286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391752890","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09550669,0.03862163,0.0014487994,0.014084741,0.008642885,0.00025826844,0.000045839464,0.00010292335,0.8412882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99787843,0.00031942633,0.00012167313,0.0002311221,0.001295133,0.000001981931,3.1812968e-7,0.00000773044,0.00014415779],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986744,0.0000958116,0.00028625815,0.00013611416,0.00040421748,0.00040318814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899876,0.00013138205,0.00008558683,0.000065555396,0.00018446226,0.00053423265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007483743,0.0000978944,0.00020431122,0.00014305087,0.0011540436,0.0003243418,0.00032378294,0.00007416207,0.00007527482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000076289354,0.00009288568,0.00013137869,0.0003321262,0.0006904308,0.00038034233,0.000013893131,0.00024666678,0.000087748784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017490324,0.0000034785267,0.001219183,0.000017669585,0.0000562072,0.0007824926,0.0027379375,0.000009646188,0.000039111215,0.9922082,0.001114051,0.0018102775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000102115024,0.00005303899,0.0055151735,0.002431269,0.00011202337,0.0001827084,0.0026371574,0.000009878234,0.000111650144,0.015075288,0.9734903,0.00027938967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11581982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2719101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9771329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005686306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025486224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.890068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391757620","doi":"10.1017/9781009049450.001","title":"Introduction","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; University of Toronto; University of Oxford; Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Latin Americans; Narrative; Period (music); Perspective (graphical); Craft; Politics; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Social science; History; Genealogy; Law; Aesthetics; Literature; Art; Visual arts; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02478256825938784,"score_gpt":0.22254223332971532,"score_spread":0.19775966507032747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391757620","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000007679751,0.00060914375,0.000026954998,0.0007741164,0.0013125954,0.0001773564,0.00008452665,0.00019475585,0.9968129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009504379,0.00054536975,0.000008429248,0.000038280592,0.0029195596,3.7686962e-7,0.000013386129,0.000011741841,0.9955124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991144,0.000017541775,0.00008552957,0.00031923337,0.00028414608,0.00017918019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956596,0.000027118022,0.000057577177,0.00013031872,0.00013194316,0.00008706777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010232855,0.00015519414,0.0001810814,0.00009246834,0.00064000377,0.0000476224,0.00020739119,0.00020892514,0.000026560785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012481955,0.00018036379,0.00014391584,0.000009407228,0.0008695527,0.00005966037,0.00016708323,0.0002789517,0.00019969868],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010996246,0.0000017993827,2.2078356e-7,0.000009300855,0.000082764775,0.000063821004,0.00012235976,2.5303302e-7,0.0000016903133,0.8131074,0.18595017,0.0006492495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051985335,0.00000959748,0.0000017656179,0.000051788873,0.00016040231,0.0000015496178,0.00020821043,5.808065e-7,0.000005874493,0.0012950528,0.9980188,0.00019440839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025829903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000106604086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8120686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030657355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001948356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7355022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391760035","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4694814","title":"Comparative Constitutional Law: Reflection of a Field Transformed","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional law; Law; Political science; Field (mathematics); Reflection (computer programming); Comparative law; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.032797126649491005,"score_gpt":0.3507828207633811,"score_spread":0.31798569411389005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391760035","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035332974,0.020971952,0.04287117,0.010281536,0.0014945916,0.0002352995,0.000010362758,0.00009939435,0.8887027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99539715,0.0035229959,0.000022152073,0.00009405411,0.0004273198,0.000004269474,0.0000010338007,0.0000016475407,0.0005293489],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987108,0.00006741871,0.00017444775,0.000092278184,0.00029472096,0.0006603331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996659,0.00012885743,0.00003499563,0.000023630635,0.00010672341,0.000039876955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008326922,0.00006465682,0.00013087114,0.000060051574,0.0006996133,0.000038466307,0.00009109765,0.00005131687,0.000077208344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036146237,0.000054527616,0.00010326906,0.00022814993,0.00090231106,0.00020823945,0.0000062071435,0.0006128562,0.000020441754],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003148187,0.00002013371,0.000059812082,0.0000025549625,0.00014125674,0.000001728724,0.0017702278,0.0000065290765,0.00016117959,0.994892,0.00020763122,0.0027054858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012649865,0.00014665956,0.000026082287,0.000049632752,0.00003561333,0.000048872305,0.006817506,0.0000076028477,0.00028060182,0.8962518,0.096133314,0.00007579615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025028249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027832892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96006423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004829073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004377759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9899066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391777617","doi":"10.48152/ssrp-qxvj-fz21","title":"Reproduction of 'When Do Politicians Appeal Broadly? The Economic Consequences of Electoral Rules in Brazil'","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Reproduction; Political science; Political economy; Economics; Biology; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.048713306444732575,"score_gpt":0.35275628258334407,"score_spread":0.3040429761386115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391777617","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08968265,0.012619997,0.000003482899,0.008846297,0.0025690468,0.0004199592,0.0001536219,0.000044841887,0.8856601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923285,0.0029558598,0.000024372099,0.000034798584,0.0010806584,0.000019079038,0.00000941175,0.000007336053,0.003539988],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981792,0.00012859704,0.0005671266,0.00035399772,0.000514089,0.00025701255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916553,0.00013693766,0.00027683735,0.00017633426,0.00021409486,0.000030260082],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001480183,0.00014312021,0.00042868004,0.0001387571,0.00017327497,0.000034734283,0.00026603532,0.00016202804,0.0002560593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035765322,0.000100531084,0.00016282313,0.00015192738,0.0028589242,0.00007232901,0.00007378519,0.00021017167,0.000034981258],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013274846,0.000027635604,0.012597014,0.000089976835,0.00018170758,0.000006293239,0.0022521336,0.000014433302,0.000057324192,0.96397024,0.016866837,0.0039231186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000103558974,0.000073165735,0.008223484,0.0005630218,0.00018349262,0.000016927217,0.008848963,0.0000012419742,0.0006894323,0.63476264,0.3461583,0.00037579588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46135575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12339463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9026458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059760665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058390996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391796935","doi":"10.7202/1101492ar","title":"A. DE MESTRAL, S. BIRKS, M. BOTHE, I. COTLER, D. KLINCK ET A. MOREL (dir.), La limitation des droits de l’homme en droit constitutionnel comparé, Cowansville (Québec), Éditions Yvon Blais, 1986, + 593 p. (55,00$ CAN)","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02416973239511718,"score_gpt":0.28969897895224056,"score_spread":0.2655292465571234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391796935","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39014858,0.013161441,0.012894928,0.11555128,0.004093467,0.0012592037,0.0043870523,0.0010234765,0.45748058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9689988,0.011642026,0.0009739161,0.0018552485,0.0015300638,0.00022203846,0.00067052897,0.00005701455,0.01405036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960828,0.0005801769,0.00081001525,0.00065699464,0.00081184955,0.001058182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967121,0.001589028,0.00037021376,0.00025174147,0.0005856395,0.0004912836],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015542221,0.00045950327,0.0005423327,0.0003886912,0.0015456877,0.0003172606,0.00080031087,0.00044240564,0.0007521973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015388413,0.0006022496,0.00041095822,0.0010050155,0.0031710824,0.00061205734,0.000158234,0.0006999657,0.00096959504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052593346,0.0004668602,0.005705132,0.000076839795,0.0004665304,0.00026336403,0.0076548816,0.0064938366,0.00021636342,0.93152255,0.045223832,0.001857217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011120543,0.00008620935,0.030907907,0.001059858,0.00029873938,0.00042483598,0.0039537884,0.0074836602,0.000073131596,0.42940447,0.5243217,0.0008737012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21785522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28711212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5788502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038009367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052386066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391863192","doi":"10.51644/9780889205666","title":"“Race,” Rights and the Law in the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Race (biology); Political science; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.012274143225049283,"score_gpt":0.22954724679621058,"score_spread":0.2172731035711613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391863192","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009345973,0.0009570607,8.832485e-7,0.008502705,0.000111325324,0.00020237602,0.000016191027,0.0000035497835,0.9901124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25316715,0.00009189737,0.000003911225,0.0011604019,0.00036151704,0.0000113077795,0.000004545813,0.0000021520418,0.7451971],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991141,0.000090595306,0.00013589917,0.0000850143,0.00044772343,0.00012666237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999386,0.000424158,0.000057125428,0.00006386775,0.000054781587,0.0000140376505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048647114,0.00007345228,0.000176931,0.0000094000225,0.00065351534,0.000017330318,0.00020303331,0.00005900478,0.000050855087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001972601,0.000033061046,0.000030974792,0.000045453005,0.0021416317,0.000021013302,0.000029239127,0.00011265173,0.0000011548286],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031169282,0.0000026413684,0.000024066261,0.0000012350029,0.000009183127,0.0000020560285,0.00065646233,4.423018e-7,9.284162e-9,0.7645249,0.23476286,0.000013064635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008087282,0.0000016694506,0.00017332984,0.000012082435,0.0000108258055,2.1335714e-7,0.0003634993,2.5818193e-7,1.6589941e-7,0.32416198,0.67515814,0.000036948906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9929732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4403953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009345077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011692017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7890931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391869898","doi":"10.3138/9781487514662-006","title":"4. The Supreme Federal Court of Brazil: Protecting Democracy and Centralized Power","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill-Queen's University Press","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Democracy; Power (physics); Law and economics; Sociology; Physics; Politics","score_opus":0.027530345234883777,"score_gpt":0.2558128227021419,"score_spread":0.2282824774672581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391869898","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018634213,0.0022072985,0.000014037086,0.00023855676,0.00014626347,0.0003674045,0.000030389376,0.00001774042,0.99679196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17230774,0.002636466,0.000090775284,0.000012516921,0.00010517402,3.4293808e-7,0.0000013786371,0.00000906803,0.82483655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919605,0.000049247854,0.000116666924,0.0001607904,0.00030549377,0.0001717302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913216,0.00011764498,0.00033963475,0.00015261714,0.00019711468,0.000060848397],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024397366,0.000120456105,0.00025563614,0.000006267695,0.0032930954,0.000036587964,0.00036035944,0.00014220538,0.00007083099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005980323,0.000110733716,0.00011179692,3.3090234e-7,0.001925267,0.000101724625,0.00021970329,0.00012635875,6.6233133e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015892812,0.000007259637,0.00008710224,0.000019471912,0.00024222003,0.0000072588355,0.012475581,1.9248924e-7,0.000023740768,0.97892,0.001289767,0.0067684813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029422948,0.00003022855,0.00033646714,0.00014515886,0.00006985866,4.7471985e-7,0.00073701516,7.787137e-7,0.000015754928,0.015070072,0.98316276,0.00013720994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36124846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21543963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.981873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000103986444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016668059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391915596","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjae004","title":"<i>Rethinking Decentralization: Mapping the Meaning of Subsidiarity in Federal Political Culture</i>, by Jacob Deem","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Decentralization; Meaning (existential); Politics; Political science; Public administration; Political culture; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.04500437366301309,"score_gpt":0.2957533105465377,"score_spread":0.2507489368835246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391915596","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45074555,0.041769996,0.005313106,0.35969603,0.004588016,0.00064623926,0.000027085298,0.000097301585,0.13711667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965676,0.0014044559,0.00008597601,0.0012202413,0.0006064293,0.0000019325632,0.000001217133,0.000005551796,0.00010658662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784434,0.00048258025,0.00047526837,0.000090876405,0.00072141865,0.00038550803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989508,0.0004528105,0.00016389438,0.00006367802,0.00027820165,0.00009063036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025492255,0.00010561308,0.00020840424,0.000068720095,0.0011810107,0.00043948457,0.00040675033,0.00007240083,0.000029464823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005655449,0.00005870441,0.00012760029,0.0005217772,0.0005425503,0.00047191206,0.000067276436,0.0004490812,0.0000020893283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015280933,0.00003287792,0.005801455,0.000014279854,0.00008597433,0.000012610394,0.042266496,0.000024486455,0.00019212248,0.9386855,0.0122249955,0.0006439281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005496573,0.00006812391,0.009326615,0.000724978,0.000103027065,0.0001434839,0.035636555,0.00017149551,0.0005219188,0.7298485,0.222569,0.00033665905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005659132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039130547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5458221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001899963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037905184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90834993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392165691","doi":"10.30958/ajphil.3-1-3","title":"Jurisprudence: The Study of the Rule of Law in a Republic","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ATHENS JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Burman University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Rule of law; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.049265745483881185,"score_gpt":0.3327839149457431,"score_spread":0.2835181694618619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392165691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93231344,0.0025539359,0.0000019904203,0.017198676,0.0005220585,0.00015220743,0.0000031550512,0.0000039672123,0.04725054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99934167,0.00009389961,0.0000057101474,0.00013156323,0.00039732008,0.0000019296685,1.921873e-8,0.000002535804,0.000025382356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874574,0.00017356066,0.000355952,0.00006448846,0.00056346593,0.000096821044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930656,0.00020767978,0.00018294378,0.00009806716,0.00018241479,0.000022321321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010132126,0.000053343,0.0001643431,0.000056176534,0.00022792364,0.00002144487,0.000400849,0.000026046333,0.000020318697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015527714,0.000026468777,0.00013063801,0.00046039006,0.0007168339,0.00012496323,0.000055730623,0.00019703874,0.0000019463396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014941291,0.00021011193,0.0043261587,0.000006326236,0.00008487847,0.000012129645,0.05793762,0.000015448188,0.00006508267,0.9367855,0.00008236137,0.0004593989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031892088,0.00026419022,0.021822082,0.0003151552,0.00009115313,0.000010211297,0.012203523,0.0000032072912,0.000056717403,0.9309363,0.03390189,0.00007667444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019923938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007894478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06702817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035572943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020826419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30119166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392970856","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192898579.013.23","title":"Agendas, Decisions, and Autonomy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Government (linguistics); Autonomy; Discretion; Credibility; Law; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.04565380966231196,"score_gpt":0.24914182698485032,"score_spread":0.20348801732253835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392970856","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000022763994,0.0013875463,0.00003613888,0.00019705917,0.00030061803,0.00018657903,0.000091456204,0.00011363746,0.9976642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019524484,0.0031927647,0.00007024426,0.000049414397,0.00021400211,4.626189e-7,0.0000053835047,0.000009682246,0.9945056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991801,0.000014922842,0.000091244954,0.00028964455,0.0002464805,0.00017763785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995514,0.00010263663,0.00005380869,0.00010442939,0.000067140194,0.00012057726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010249375,0.00016015812,0.00019898546,0.000088617286,0.0008500287,0.00006474342,0.00021099098,0.00021136554,0.000059236758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012818131,0.00017164733,0.00010469839,0.0000075528474,0.0008769316,0.000058592806,0.00034053632,0.00022464697,0.0000069479806],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010847574,0.0000018569918,0.0000030613267,0.0000051891416,0.00009312902,0.00009092353,0.00085991574,1.6116284e-7,2.076398e-7,0.98206824,0.002755478,0.0141109675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069386704,0.000009885512,0.0000076223514,0.0001165325,0.00012453295,0.0000011163897,0.0003033632,9.208308e-7,5.480156e-7,0.075882964,0.92330444,0.00017867987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012480612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008877981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.920549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019309946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035206188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6999575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393015592","doi":"10.1515/9780791485842-012","title":"For the Love of Justice? Judicial Review in Canada and the United States","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"SUNY Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.059164669670302664,"score_gpt":0.2873727495401552,"score_spread":0.22820807986985253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393015592","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000018527817,0.11834342,0.000007754168,0.0017608781,0.00037806245,0.0011255435,0.000156867,0.0000042288966,0.8782047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06622056,0.5022394,0.00002246347,0.009413107,0.002512169,0.00027973682,0.000058181387,0.000055055963,0.41919935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990782,0.00006068785,0.0002535159,0.0001101903,0.00030277416,0.00019462954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837536,0.0011474886,0.00018522699,0.00010493461,0.00015001914,0.00003697184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005729397,0.00012557725,0.00032176933,0.000018681301,0.00027802197,0.000011011748,0.00021463695,0.000058215,0.000030075633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001499674,0.000070411574,0.00006127219,0.000010885661,0.0013350691,0.000015027813,0.000081292994,0.00015344964,8.566694e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037778904,0.0000013737804,0.000011019879,0.00017188638,0.00007511966,7.059421e-7,0.0015745346,0.0000017607217,4.06181e-8,0.98856026,0.00532962,0.004235929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001990799,0.000004768835,0.000027060618,0.00060214987,0.00043233042,2.3627126e-7,0.0005084066,0.000003693167,8.2549985e-7,0.048453953,0.94967127,0.00009625192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9782416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.979288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9443416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008717306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073253247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49191177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393015936","doi":"10.1515/9780791485842","title":"Constitutional Politics in Canada and the United States","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"SUNY Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03512824171952666,"score_gpt":0.258304286262496,"score_spread":0.22317604454296935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393015936","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003173488,0.0029662652,0.000004311668,0.00039718414,0.0004362785,0.00028942796,0.00018039701,0.000014066574,0.9953947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22633493,0.0016915171,0.000011448429,0.0021253827,0.0014033627,0.00009101809,0.00014051326,0.00001172625,0.7681901],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987877,0.00013582502,0.00019442488,0.0001339013,0.00041059626,0.00033758092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991306,0.000505216,0.000082371895,0.000080320955,0.00010471791,0.00009675429],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028878613,0.00014180945,0.00023081117,0.000030216966,0.0006137007,0.000035914753,0.00017196486,0.0000952862,0.000023615274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007941293,0.000103551676,0.000032413758,0.000016098247,0.005799503,0.000025939837,0.00010333573,0.0002578628,0.000002029647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010279786,0.0000022743081,0.00030161813,0.000007748381,0.000040529358,0.000006104741,0.0014927796,0.0000058708297,1.0967108e-8,0.9914145,0.006507922,0.0002103984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002563786,0.0000015111588,0.00011601339,0.000052378553,0.000034471926,0.000001124968,0.00042824235,0.000003009331,4.1058465e-7,0.10288446,0.8960952,0.00012678096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99626607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99058217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8895873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006041508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053746477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99690616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393378489","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-90434-0_72-1","title":"Judicialisation of Public Policy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.08421998865131865,"score_gpt":0.32866772545684914,"score_spread":0.2444477368055305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393378489","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00000563348,0.0017982232,0.000027598942,0.010807347,0.00043459315,0.00010924645,0.000027554672,0.00007443406,0.9867154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1298244,0.0018191686,0.000015354817,0.00022565952,0.0021159363,0.0000037084174,0.000010040124,0.0000092393075,0.8659765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909616,0.000010385827,0.00019199845,0.00014261514,0.00041988117,0.0001389632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995726,0.000052601354,0.00007766985,0.00006522843,0.00017741445,0.00005451332],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025821375,0.00009859939,0.00018551236,0.00018720567,0.00024557262,0.000033147222,0.00012190924,0.00016604328,0.0012542432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012124543,0.000087904424,0.00012083232,0.000080653044,0.0009236228,0.00006062648,0.00006037938,0.00009998627,0.00045401507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.336699e-7,0.0000030667563,0.000011945087,0.000005653179,0.000056178713,0.000001192077,0.00039995453,5.809925e-8,8.9453187e-7,0.98886037,0.0038397533,0.0068203183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009514025,0.0000045367697,0.000012096898,0.000026682574,0.000015790136,8.603923e-8,0.00009779933,8.926278e-8,6.9413846e-7,0.51056165,0.48922095,0.000050119288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023019895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4853812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015318418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010502415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393905308","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4746964","title":"The Judicialisation of Parliamentary Privilege in Canada: A Cautionary Tale","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Privilege (computing); Law","score_opus":0.009926968661262192,"score_gpt":0.251231844322779,"score_spread":0.24130487566151682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393905308","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8672051,0.077202834,0.0003359392,0.03394733,0.0019941858,0.00027410215,0.000015402327,0.000024421364,0.019000689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865186,0.012936883,0.0000021441901,0.00006240538,0.00033828136,0.0000054851207,0.0000010705626,0.0000026275527,0.00013250392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854803,0.00010026347,0.00019056958,0.00007306004,0.00036342032,0.00072464085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997128,0.00014068035,0.000045680477,0.00003151866,0.0000423092,0.00002697265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013291659,0.000049232116,0.000075443866,0.000036122245,0.00061386294,0.000023868693,0.00013311766,0.000019553258,0.000017041488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006749117,0.0000360122,0.000039385475,0.00024649987,0.00021345842,0.000112932525,0.000017257718,0.00045065422,0.0000029820756],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009631301,0.00000826739,0.008001913,0.000001288524,0.000053140415,0.0000060591096,0.0006433978,0.0000164803,0.000011191627,0.9715559,0.0005560429,0.01913672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000100938596,0.000032876793,0.013163918,0.000050577302,0.000020254762,0.000020276271,0.036609575,0.00003268825,0.0000092370965,0.900471,0.04940815,0.00008050939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9620212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99897337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11931351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003717214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028031414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97747874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394002624","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4748491","title":"International Judicial Habitus: Pierre Bourdieu and the Cognitive Turn","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Habitus; Sociology; Cognition; Epistemology; Psychology; Social science; Philosophy; Cultural capital","score_opus":0.008827501694022648,"score_gpt":0.2928510759687322,"score_spread":0.2840235742747096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394002624","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07324674,0.12576923,0.0035787118,0.10756373,0.005253299,0.0004386351,0.00002306758,0.00015596795,0.68397063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96212053,0.03326218,0.000003810604,0.000298157,0.002677042,0.000008050554,0.0000011769772,0.000005197912,0.00162386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833614,0.00013104909,0.00014742158,0.00013649039,0.00039192094,0.0008569839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995223,0.0002522287,0.00004393072,0.00002456845,0.00010512179,0.00005184775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020752186,0.0000860653,0.000116331576,0.000056464956,0.0012826775,0.0002535236,0.00017970176,0.000045683733,0.00009325832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032990918,0.000056009267,0.00009898965,0.00014259848,0.0010999915,0.00016970666,0.00005308618,0.0009710918,0.000045916604],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006783534,0.000009257581,0.00036854844,6.343965e-7,0.00026924594,0.0000066331518,0.0027802896,3.7015576e-7,0.0000017412923,0.93691444,0.00039467137,0.05918634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005275757,0.00003655977,0.0005168059,0.000055883287,0.00007539516,0.00010250988,0.021137929,0.000022496,0.0000010479305,0.8532052,0.124226496,0.00009212073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002201686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011637662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8888738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033790382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019008423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9865448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394701323","doi":"10.25071/a08pgg98","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada in 1999: The year in review","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada Watch","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01394882161947168,"score_gpt":0.24103654938086647,"score_spread":0.2270877277613948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394701323","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08090333,0.037800644,9.1118075e-8,0.5529998,0.00039841834,0.0004204462,0.000027504018,0.0000043249306,0.32744542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857243,0.010958061,7.162937e-7,0.0015880108,0.00004740024,0.000009956561,5.6433515e-7,0.0000012630186,0.0016697432],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992144,0.00007597205,0.00013490899,0.00005887511,0.0003333475,0.0001825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997177,0.00013081974,0.00002059119,0.000070756316,0.00003136605,0.000028770794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039606218,0.00003727976,0.00009201017,0.0000025909926,0.00028916274,0.00000459295,0.0001971532,0.000011353736,0.00017387331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000115538875,0.000021917178,0.000012001977,0.00022129159,0.00018969737,0.000015461223,0.000010891319,0.000070195885,0.00000107398],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044066646,0.0000052335236,0.013597167,0.000011370764,0.00000781153,0.000011596205,0.00048106635,0.0000180824,4.6971223e-7,0.014940826,0.96518356,0.005738437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033823995,0.000001256987,0.014981665,0.0000822362,0.0000022070208,1.3042836e-7,0.00094728137,6.804959e-7,0.0000016602972,0.000896934,0.98301977,0.000032363903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9998765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.904821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030228627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039801844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7060677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394701515","doi":"10.25071/knwxgs81","title":"Judicial activism and the Constitution","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada Watch","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Judicial activism; Political science; Law; Judicial review","score_opus":0.010164902908540857,"score_gpt":0.23038024832909915,"score_spread":0.2202153454205583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394701515","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.115945116,0.00060427404,0.000010447791,0.14482293,0.0003738386,0.00015726306,0.0000074535337,0.000020930598,0.73805773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968154,0.00035229768,0.0000035240294,0.0012689602,0.00030339387,0.000007791257,6.9083586e-7,8.866048e-7,0.0012470641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944603,0.00005642111,0.00006095545,0.000078792924,0.00021632589,0.00014149064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99978215,0.000089811816,0.000013373965,0.00003722206,0.00002887324,0.0000485822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017440395,0.0000423737,0.00007527125,0.0000033300523,0.0012306615,0.00002275765,0.00006606511,0.000021551054,0.00028350716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006216149,0.000028741586,0.000014143283,0.00008264844,0.0014934218,0.00004872271,0.000009789683,0.000056454657,0.000007812913],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004615413,0.000005514103,0.0010485341,7.8433965e-7,0.000023682554,0.0000079690935,0.0015838116,0.0000054195943,0.0000030298027,0.87096196,0.088744745,0.037568398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023889643,0.0000019968945,0.002127264,0.0000040407976,0.000010235784,0.0000012262929,0.00081350666,0.0000027361898,0.000006460399,0.01980449,0.97693866,0.000050464747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9756054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9764476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8881939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000086813365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008357285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9465378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394757774","doi":"10.1111/jels.12380","title":"Rankings without U.S. News: A revealed preference approach to evaluating law schools","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; Andrew W. Mellon Foundation","keywords":"Preference; Ranking (information retrieval); CLARITY; Legal education; Scope (computer science); Psychology; Mathematics education; Political science; Law; Sociology; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.258648525459174,"score_gpt":0.4668240924227282,"score_spread":0.20817556696355421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394757774","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40645567,0.052665003,0.0022752443,0.06617808,0.0030267823,0.0008888514,0.000010686878,0.00019591989,0.46830377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99151725,0.0007884298,0.0034917784,0.0018429009,0.0017028349,0.000021696345,2.2821901e-7,0.000008985808,0.0006259136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973283,0.00027573784,0.00060258416,0.0002568105,0.0011641537,0.0003724086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838954,0.00040372805,0.00015704734,0.00007688153,0.0007698787,0.0002029246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00198013,0.00017605725,0.00053467945,0.00011360188,0.0009840128,0.0003360329,0.00030862185,0.0000695585,0.000014833071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024713497,0.00012117555,0.0002197569,0.0006812274,0.0005106098,0.00061623816,0.00015432484,0.00048701273,0.000050512313],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030008145,0.00032045422,0.02209443,0.0001480406,0.0017852376,0.00015550618,0.044409126,0.0001964228,0.0002523355,0.82955754,0.08262959,0.018151214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007813921,0.0007525833,0.008770335,0.001752373,0.0005212078,0.00006451192,0.042357862,0.000062248444,0.000025383844,0.11852659,0.8257338,0.000651735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016229795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00079468347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74310416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032027537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005329291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7568331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394828478","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4780291","title":"Tribunals in Canada: A Coming of Age","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Computer science; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Political science; Computer security","score_opus":0.015848611737089863,"score_gpt":0.27670072282188957,"score_spread":0.2608521110847997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394828478","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8707019,0.056122612,0.00056177576,0.0090300245,0.0008971803,0.00014127047,0.000007667139,0.00002162822,0.06251591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99451196,0.0049360697,0.0000041132516,0.00004104502,0.00018444234,0.0000014114744,2.5958133e-7,0.000002238055,0.0003184804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986023,0.00006382819,0.00016644689,0.000064218184,0.00026733105,0.00083592883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99979484,0.0000885428,0.000031459862,0.000020855023,0.000031936568,0.000032372813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012394569,0.00004388201,0.00011319998,0.000056408076,0.0001937209,0.000019292238,0.00011149969,0.000019126359,0.000026280155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009197691,0.00003808312,0.000041649313,0.00027366384,0.00009852695,0.00007038527,0.0000129412965,0.0005184379,0.000002768133],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058933206,0.000006431946,0.0034317595,0.0000020133066,0.000044897817,0.000031045143,0.00068885245,0.0000092135115,0.000030202122,0.98414826,0.0001454271,0.011455972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015807414,0.00003217473,0.0036485342,0.000104893916,0.000017734033,0.000024846706,0.020224726,0.0000124036005,0.000018916737,0.9419908,0.033668634,0.00009827346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9550045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12381001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002675114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026931817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9785846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395030879","doi":"10.29173/alr2721","title":"The Federal Court of Appeal and the Federal Court: 50 Years of History, Martine Valois, Ian Greene, Craig Forcese &amp; Peter McCormick, eds. (Toronto: Irwin Law, 2021)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Federal court; Political science; Supreme court","score_opus":0.01906055500878211,"score_gpt":0.2724870684572662,"score_spread":0.2534265134484841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395030879","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004885851,0.53063595,0.0000043018495,0.028816614,0.000848878,0.0012021015,0.00003718672,0.000014586616,0.43355456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8929775,0.09539058,0.00003383597,0.0047151954,0.00034024287,0.00016246933,0.000017196431,0.000016297245,0.006346715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99793655,0.0004994219,0.00046412705,0.00021206436,0.0005859001,0.00030195373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998751,0.00055000925,0.00029393652,0.00022919917,0.0001026112,0.00007323638],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013947933,0.00014736109,0.00047682083,0.0000067443716,0.0016638918,0.000031755964,0.0004006535,0.00003473959,0.0009902554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018235562,0.00009814788,0.00022530093,0.000085631415,0.0021739167,0.0001281936,0.0002474223,0.00015424889,0.00001858497],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008182049,0.000055906843,0.00075614767,0.000121976525,0.00013687849,0.0000015261733,0.0019434898,9.358485e-7,0.000006064893,0.95498836,0.03474836,0.0071585383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033682978,0.0000379684,0.00085687404,0.00018600565,0.00008059628,0.000004745912,0.00027335336,0.0000014593733,4.2899703e-7,0.0027293041,0.9953694,0.00012306603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34786737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5567477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.960621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018204526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018938359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395031272","doi":"10.29173/alr2755","title":"Bruce Ziff's Legal History","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.050778602036031496,"score_gpt":0.3156489605181829,"score_spread":0.2648703584821514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395031272","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025027897,0.11564225,7.675803e-7,0.01663463,0.00060137635,0.00017484666,0.0000010219059,0.00006985333,0.86662495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41711548,0.4378576,0.000029277906,0.040048044,0.0012692269,0.00016990751,0.000023142362,0.000020994457,0.10346631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991453,0.00009056763,0.00014766262,0.00014717625,0.0002460139,0.00022322338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954456,0.0001912588,0.000041835927,0.00010254957,0.000050541308,0.000069259775],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035544176,0.000071672075,0.00019010752,0.000012328633,0.00042987688,0.000010804689,0.00017083662,0.000029972754,0.00084479817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031666682,0.00006241827,0.00009844863,0.00026033208,0.0004687218,0.00012619744,0.00004964763,0.000061546576,0.003311392],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.301379e-7,0.000005509759,0.00007280833,0.00004802263,0.000010274696,0.000004027315,0.00017184962,4.684204e-8,9.085205e-7,0.8511087,0.14640948,0.0021679844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027345017,0.0000043953282,0.00022267373,0.00039082306,0.000027396618,7.305921e-7,0.000032137392,2.0276033e-7,3.6941924e-7,0.0023454907,0.9968621,0.00008634999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18670362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10453032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8504526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012750257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018477066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99746466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395042680","doi":"10.21991/cf29472","title":"Comparative Constitutional Design: Northern Stagnation, Southern Innovation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic stagnation; Geography; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.06425865409382112,"score_gpt":0.3219219051417255,"score_spread":0.25766325104790433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395042680","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026096082,0.005501566,0.7199565,0.015576367,0.0052445256,0.0015091357,0.0009820246,0.0011782948,0.24744193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99393684,0.00014756426,0.0018594986,0.0011494197,0.0009425154,0.00028189857,0.0003772184,0.000015055253,0.0012899904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950627,0.00030355758,0.0010657504,0.00094398827,0.0015024455,0.0011215486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966159,0.00073476334,0.00023156851,0.0002886945,0.0018328902,0.00029618246],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012833322,0.0005692529,0.0005790594,0.0008236804,0.0055698254,0.00055802567,0.0005294188,0.0003656613,0.0010284812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008786802,0.0005600436,0.0002979477,0.002525336,0.029543962,0.001544375,0.00017193898,0.0005735193,0.001772926],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007475062,0.00014697669,0.0037363837,0.000017986884,0.00032947067,0.000060777205,0.0013929358,0.0033337802,0.0001706504,0.97847044,0.0100574065,0.0022084618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007907788,0.00007958044,0.00012578438,0.00037953147,0.00013611485,0.00011737747,0.012766409,0.0012838728,0.00011135468,0.26157278,0.7217153,0.0009211635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010156318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025120513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9913272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011196439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01060435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395048310","doi":"10.21991/cf29467","title":"Editorial Introduction","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science","score_opus":0.015231513895649548,"score_gpt":0.281960348890499,"score_spread":0.26672883499484945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395048310","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00048604727,0.0069859433,0.060792033,0.07746841,0.41595283,0.000862956,0.00030372833,0.0016192032,0.43552884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86867213,0.00048392822,0.00030852164,0.0005518916,0.12855317,0.0001182846,0.00010925093,0.000011342121,0.0011914945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965712,0.00012095297,0.00052246766,0.0007138322,0.0011634154,0.0009081287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860466,0.00025508302,0.00007573282,0.00023139354,0.00053129566,0.00030183938],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007734602,0.00033051908,0.00031244784,0.00033352862,0.0040657725,0.00043423678,0.00035475285,0.0003212491,0.0009774896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009085806,0.00032388285,0.0003086813,0.000926635,0.012451005,0.0013376372,0.00014190332,0.00047741306,0.0018247792],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024429704,0.00004086931,0.00047425393,0.000007898689,0.00007896615,0.000014019535,0.00013859224,0.00008445408,0.000063795706,0.62548774,0.37200612,0.0015788599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026799383,0.000026475798,0.000029978983,0.00009134823,0.000059728936,0.000045061017,0.0019109303,0.000057469537,0.00003434704,0.14855105,0.8485663,0.00035933292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012725564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010455257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86818606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004306006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395089460","doi":"10.1017/9781009473194.027","title":"Illiberal Constitutionalism and the Abuse of Constitutional Identity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Identity (music); Political science; Criminology; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Democracy; Aesthetics; Politics","score_opus":0.025110150691679982,"score_gpt":0.23493059706896396,"score_spread":0.20982044637728398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395089460","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000084464235,0.0035475492,0.0001933529,0.0002461788,0.0005899082,0.00035477072,0.0005354349,0.000057077013,0.99439126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03856274,0.0026443305,0.000018474453,0.00010636316,0.00030413544,0.0000012998998,0.000016245696,0.000005920063,0.95834047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882114,0.000052278505,0.00018579795,0.00027463018,0.0004971483,0.00016902787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999145,0.00021963945,0.00014024634,0.00013086479,0.00027516225,0.000089126646],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003128329,0.00018724796,0.0003285915,0.00008536394,0.0009641423,0.000059814363,0.00030549907,0.00019834793,0.000007816441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033761306,0.00016196695,0.00020400387,0.00001650776,0.026227016,0.0001475158,0.0002287764,0.00029691393,0.000014433813],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006802438,0.0000051308725,0.0000032680275,0.000024962805,0.00029705357,0.000042960437,0.00044959658,0.000001142177,8.389831e-7,0.9942453,0.00480384,0.00005790934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005072788,0.0000050079248,0.000010772703,0.0001757729,0.0003957614,0.000006735807,0.00020948486,0.0000025953952,0.0000025941326,0.021381583,0.97712165,0.0001807358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036058205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014867987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9728637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013738169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005627539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.976423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395089461","doi":"10.1017/9781009473194.031","title":"Contrariness and Contradiction in Constitutional Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Contradiction; Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02602890849236177,"score_gpt":0.22179903440866924,"score_spread":0.19577012591630746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395089461","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006906564,0.0012048696,0.000050587052,0.00017454747,0.00047583034,0.00028579144,0.00020192005,0.000086084794,0.9974513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13555801,0.0006024117,0.0000051406882,0.0000919227,0.00024783768,0.0000011027561,0.000014001626,0.000006116695,0.8634735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991306,0.000024035731,0.00012552516,0.00029858958,0.00023202467,0.00018921425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995993,0.00008405693,0.000054022043,0.00007027595,0.000094683404,0.00009767623],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012968887,0.00016795837,0.0002513749,0.000097738084,0.00052499864,0.000055085962,0.00012344499,0.00023322811,0.0000052595406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000963664,0.00019595739,0.00007349552,0.000010464169,0.004564876,0.00009170929,0.00011071852,0.00029180115,0.00001097014],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003436555,0.00000456472,0.000012983377,0.00001596892,0.00007454724,0.00023647473,0.0001246913,6.7282747e-7,0.0000017386284,0.99769205,0.0015584579,0.0002434624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031153802,0.000009405329,0.000030123274,0.00019030175,0.00009997368,0.000007309388,0.00016921469,0.000004644814,0.0000019116576,0.005366257,0.9935985,0.00021077145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010888284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014635902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99232584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025710624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002671652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99814415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395089491","doi":"10.1017/9781009473194.025","title":"Constitution Making and Disharmonic Identity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Identity (music); Political science; Law; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.04120097028812875,"score_gpt":0.2593023104116443,"score_spread":0.21810134012351556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395089491","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009293358,0.0020948306,0.00011996568,0.000108992266,0.00055144005,0.00023467204,0.00015847792,0.00014338746,0.9964953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08109558,0.001135031,0.000010543105,0.000046933787,0.00028961,5.213729e-7,0.0000070143583,0.000007427414,0.91740733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904346,0.000021701499,0.00010410837,0.00033284872,0.00029952155,0.00019835781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995854,0.00004630476,0.00007755283,0.00010153765,0.00010056018,0.00008865131],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012956485,0.00017561472,0.00021338594,0.00009306148,0.0009800298,0.00012322226,0.00020248476,0.0002081408,0.0000080860145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016517704,0.00020615525,0.0001123008,0.000011501225,0.0019113196,0.00018595356,0.00035086207,0.00027807822,0.000036427966],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000120092745,0.0000021296084,0.000008060732,0.000029186698,0.000102688005,0.00016603511,0.00016872748,1.4676391e-7,0.000001963475,0.99422455,0.004714338,0.00057016633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009108838,0.0000075689904,0.000030629522,0.00028297945,0.0002477211,0.0000033671529,0.00026960493,0.0000021235376,0.0000017386205,0.0042099576,0.9946199,0.00023332909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032539184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004643925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9900146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002758277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023310738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8406767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395089511","doi":"10.1017/9781009473194.032","title":"Conclusion","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.030950300917694233,"score_gpt":0.236994376506559,"score_spread":0.20604407558886476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395089511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000014288532,0.0010424603,0.000021418135,0.00019958505,0.0007364889,0.00021623333,0.00014917259,0.00019355767,0.9974268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003588078,0.0007503237,0.000007103696,0.00007941441,0.00053626765,3.2251782e-7,0.00001104508,0.0000130409935,0.9950144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990394,0.000019430228,0.0000931971,0.00029782427,0.00034716845,0.00020298672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995077,0.000054650987,0.000062776024,0.00012571349,0.00013214472,0.00011696834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000103177095,0.00017546362,0.00021470699,0.000083346196,0.0009114641,0.00004540157,0.0002833147,0.0002568264,0.00001827083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010485846,0.00019700841,0.00017350022,0.000008216962,0.0010493179,0.000048162823,0.00040520885,0.00028303784,0.00015383061],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013046899,0.000002014106,5.025599e-7,0.000012004056,0.000081229264,0.0002123744,0.00022879546,1.3801603e-7,0.0000023588032,0.94348216,0.055267774,0.0006976062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008239324,0.000010952093,0.0000019219908,0.00015605715,0.00015228616,0.000001233719,0.00023353838,0.0000010172762,0.0000052671785,0.0015646401,0.9975655,0.00022515921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042660646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015226586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94229776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003004259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027936377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.803377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395675405","doi":"10.3390/laws13030026","title":"The Judicialisation of Parliamentary Privilege in Canada: A Cautionary Tale","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Laws","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); History; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.017299184228529017,"score_gpt":0.2631128698595633,"score_spread":0.24581368563103426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395675405","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7897887,0.012577347,0.000029170866,0.030572852,0.0023310387,0.00035237818,0.00006541553,0.000040385137,0.16424271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99918157,0.0003920428,0.0000056046433,0.00014241383,0.00015698696,0.0000140230295,0.0000024737442,0.0000012975231,0.00010356349],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994597,0.00004524505,0.000106131716,0.00006421476,0.0002184046,0.000106322834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99977034,0.00014647469,0.00001594633,0.000031970652,0.000018728146,0.00001655849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020867011,0.000029755207,0.000051121107,0.000012230558,0.00028441424,0.000011313171,0.00006841287,0.000013198801,0.000038171103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037893216,0.000022053311,0.000017811786,0.00017697884,0.00024386303,0.000056755303,0.000018936658,0.000043012136,0.000004992673],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004674623,0.000008403311,0.020465605,0.0000040864215,0.000016260668,0.000011801357,0.0017177212,0.000012821018,0.000019722711,0.96144915,0.0074568116,0.008832947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007419767,0.000010772511,0.12595268,0.00008265623,0.000014409547,6.9410044e-7,0.012524336,0.000070453636,0.000052365293,0.11457841,0.7465418,0.00009724601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9924774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8468707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034248247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015544518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27575308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396585879","doi":"10.1007/978-3-662-68577-8_6","title":"Wie und warum zitieren Gerichte? Eine empirische Untersuchung am Beispiel des Bundesverfassungsgerichts und des Supreme Court of Canada","year":2024,"lang":"de","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Literatur und Recht","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.029990077939260434,"score_gpt":0.2856431244796622,"score_spread":0.2556530465404018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396585879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007832972,0.39975515,0.00008897228,0.0026928405,0.0072356854,0.0008709176,0.0016392673,0.00014583684,0.5797383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70632577,0.02437394,0.0009496243,0.00095538597,0.0043051597,0.00005880226,0.0004931928,0.0001924998,0.26234564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99420816,0.00016822029,0.0013593712,0.0012368016,0.0016862946,0.0013411437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99680346,0.0005918388,0.0006169059,0.00052637985,0.0009076136,0.00055381726],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073433673,0.0011495268,0.0014760338,0.00033817187,0.0020163155,0.00060040434,0.0008192971,0.0008899456,0.0006071941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019778595,0.0010119781,0.0005603385,0.0008246573,0.004645976,0.00047733673,0.0004948873,0.0012612025,0.000120405704],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003179412,0.000243349,0.0021722913,0.0012514496,0.014821333,0.0011557338,0.0126728285,0.00006279851,0.00042964655,0.92928576,0.028271198,0.009315654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028019183,0.00023652613,0.00056632207,0.003231048,0.0025564784,0.000013591742,0.00066061516,0.000017139691,0.00016687602,0.18500239,0.80616206,0.0011067843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32343444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.56192553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77789086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013620915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029966768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396602654","doi":"10.2307/jj.14491577.13","title":"Diversity and Judicial Independence in Quebec and Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Wales Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Diversity (politics); Political science; Judicial independence; Law; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.027060596265683592,"score_gpt":0.20015368899212296,"score_spread":0.17309309272643936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396602654","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04679391,0.0011180205,0.000003245668,0.00012168016,0.00008821388,0.00011569786,0.00005220418,0.000008286173,0.9516987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6678164,0.0011952658,0.000011663896,0.000032323147,0.00004528994,4.5385985e-8,0.0000021661565,0.0000025612005,0.3308943],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992813,0.000026918246,0.00006816162,0.00019295668,0.00031501954,0.00011565454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964315,0.00006617525,0.00007623005,0.000053055057,0.00009416465,0.000067235356],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007802459,0.00009480227,0.00022022598,0.000038597267,0.0013733599,0.0000068401914,0.00013805197,0.00014568264,0.000021556616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015335494,0.0001229277,0.00002680853,0.0000047625317,0.001168227,0.000046754325,0.0011867891,0.00015795903,1.3294817e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028673878,0.0000044786193,0.0041236426,0.000025012085,0.00006082405,0.00025554458,0.012440098,5.354332e-7,0.0000010094907,0.9797874,0.00029406356,0.0029787265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000701029,0.000026401132,0.015941229,0.0005702601,0.00020673049,0.0000030511792,0.014792891,0.0000016211619,0.000007634175,0.0207114,0.94642514,0.000612608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9988818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99978507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.959076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016169024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078335055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396686680","doi":"10.29173/mlj1260","title":"Justice Côté in 2019: Great Dissenter, Voice of the Court, or Both?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Dissent; Supreme court; Majority opinion; Economic Justice; Law; Concurring opinion; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Court of record; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.04591240389080571,"score_gpt":0.3137131427960023,"score_spread":0.2678007389051966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396686680","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6064893,0.0038881756,0.00011307851,0.024676993,0.0051962556,0.00023201176,0.000031309748,0.00002516699,0.35934773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99755,0.0006252416,0.000046595174,0.00053630664,0.0007490937,0.0000015834572,3.533844e-7,0.0000032986986,0.0004875265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989103,0.00018136321,0.00021228031,0.00008837209,0.00040197893,0.00020567981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994786,0.00013127178,0.00009978523,0.000073395575,0.00015832587,0.00005866178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034050838,0.000066871486,0.00013443036,0.000016934875,0.0011499099,0.00006657363,0.00022875295,0.000039248414,0.00018588538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023714843,0.000042395168,0.0000802052,0.00024051264,0.00047435853,0.00012589067,0.000084142725,0.0002016073,0.000018426368],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017350906,0.00045361157,0.08473279,0.00003693455,0.0001736827,0.0007095842,0.005896906,0.000073621406,0.00036114897,0.8675978,0.028989574,0.01080083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012717813,0.00007085816,0.16464086,0.0005373678,0.000286108,0.0003331471,0.20111468,0.000010406044,0.00041490095,0.058372106,0.57258594,0.00036182223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04021982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7468282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8092257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009411631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023303292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96617144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396686901","doi":"10.29173/mlj1314","title":"Canada’s Amendment Rules: A Window into the Soul of a Constitution","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Soul; Amendment; Window (computing); Law; Political science; First amendment; Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science; Supreme court","score_opus":0.02809546596058099,"score_gpt":0.27053175619625275,"score_spread":0.24243629023567176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396686901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6873329,0.000797081,0.00011575387,0.032164462,0.0022716331,0.00028812714,0.000024986346,0.00005280711,0.27695224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986044,0.00025989264,0.00002099095,0.00050935545,0.0005593293,0.000005427036,0.0000010549716,0.0000018249012,0.00003768186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988288,0.00010254925,0.00019273291,0.00007199215,0.00058265455,0.00022126046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995351,0.00009344949,0.000102936865,0.000054489006,0.00014254084,0.000071483955],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006102703,0.0000635363,0.000108397966,0.000027673559,0.0028102638,0.000056160254,0.00020427904,0.000026263613,0.000045147826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000922606,0.000043466356,0.00005536278,0.00018628176,0.0010122907,0.000080230515,0.000050864426,0.00014043393,0.000030486264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000962187,0.0000136392555,0.0019605295,0.000002467333,0.00005377286,0.000034219644,0.003030813,0.00003630795,0.000052808573,0.9827513,0.007109741,0.004944756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002504231,0.000028697987,0.0065916907,0.000060640512,0.000039165127,0.000017475108,0.15434685,0.0000034819577,0.00011513311,0.094802156,0.74362236,0.00012193539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98868835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88794917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030399582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014645809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99848795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396686937","doi":"10.29173/mlj1315","title":"Canadian Constitutional Reform in Comparative Perspective: Some Reflections Occasioned by Richard Albert’s Global Work on Constitutional Amendments","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Work (physics); Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Sociology; Public administration; Law and economics; Art; Engineering","score_opus":0.07031329905679409,"score_gpt":0.35907123541283126,"score_spread":0.2887579363560372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396686937","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05628461,0.0005630953,0.00006379583,0.022721604,0.0028451718,0.00040873466,0.00039644018,0.000106514766,0.91661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99711585,0.00023549808,0.00004247435,0.0016029411,0.0007644362,0.000030945354,0.000033389028,0.0000034070033,0.00017105867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99766237,0.00019214288,0.00034877844,0.00030134144,0.0007953584,0.0007000262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989454,0.000101254016,0.000114682625,0.00008019938,0.00031677954,0.0004416971],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005430336,0.0002037755,0.0002679713,0.00021099522,0.005489167,0.00018563333,0.00026464666,0.00012533265,0.00017499606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009979911,0.00019247501,0.000115404575,0.001127782,0.0038233248,0.0004126179,0.000049891274,0.00045704987,0.0007433137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006310581,0.00009114589,0.004318065,6.325816e-7,0.00008266991,0.00010152835,0.0006293064,0.00013220757,0.0000062011263,0.9784845,0.015976788,0.00011383435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015364505,0.00013464701,0.014835068,0.00019889558,0.000045275516,0.00009410981,0.1182779,0.000007991685,0.000014067025,0.29631117,0.56791055,0.0006338616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68965155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9520521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94083124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010691152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018070312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396686951","doi":"10.29173/mlj1320","title":"The Unconstitutionality of Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitutional review; Constitutional amendment; Constitution","score_opus":0.05508427168182838,"score_gpt":0.3195592962365658,"score_spread":0.2644750245547374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396686951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08039516,0.0016844809,0.0019052762,0.01670441,0.008535588,0.0005406924,0.00019843626,0.00024681192,0.88978916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978183,0.0007848751,0.00008539919,0.00021554931,0.0009817482,0.000014203415,0.000009614338,0.000002802391,0.00008751127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975519,0.00021915237,0.00046375964,0.0001553202,0.0011603906,0.00044947938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848026,0.0004955083,0.00021382367,0.0001081806,0.0005411654,0.00016108683],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019753666,0.00012730954,0.0001776204,0.00007247328,0.009321022,0.0001470563,0.00040067878,0.00007170885,0.00012879961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043068666,0.000093368886,0.00017251358,0.0005242157,0.014894727,0.00028084478,0.000103720085,0.00026603104,0.0002479008],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025503103,0.0000366718,0.005428113,0.0000020145305,0.000098063414,0.000025437384,0.000120024386,0.00011760913,0.000032969157,0.9881352,0.0038608224,0.002117562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003295722,0.000017716991,0.0036740121,0.000039254173,0.000027331569,0.000048929116,0.010101429,0.000004673892,0.00003782333,0.3871784,0.5984118,0.00012903674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0125274295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07362961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9174231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002794244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013245192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99404824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396689874","doi":"10.7202/1111096ar","title":"Different Ways to Get to “Everything”?: Judicializing Everything? The Clash of Constitutionalisms in Canada, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom by Mark S. Harding","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kingdom; History; Genealogy; Biology","score_opus":0.03311867358496082,"score_gpt":0.27591329658897296,"score_spread":0.24279462300401214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396689874","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11145986,0.11967519,0.0006753491,0.6391785,0.0034521993,0.0076653957,0.0006408582,0.00010878972,0.11714385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9573565,0.005037131,0.000042778203,0.03711227,0.00012843455,0.00013053633,0.000014076397,0.0000073740525,0.00017086767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978776,0.00044553756,0.0004186813,0.00022247047,0.0007361282,0.00029958703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998967,0.0005470953,0.00014256833,0.00014511657,0.0000689338,0.00012931028],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001667716,0.00014120713,0.00043538542,0.00003799255,0.0015961002,0.00004119624,0.00040007345,0.000020497439,0.00011328473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004761387,0.00008907451,0.00007362491,0.00072433206,0.0004796352,0.000057096848,0.0003149122,0.0002217397,0.0000030019573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014610525,0.000009211222,0.0023089498,0.000027623879,0.000030473835,0.000002907286,0.00092137064,0.000060073195,0.0000043556397,0.88443124,0.11145403,0.00073515804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026561765,0.000010511766,0.0008046307,0.00061822595,0.00005263393,0.000003038449,0.00042808303,0.0000036296162,0.0000023833727,0.00607247,0.99161077,0.00012800211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9824247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9307391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88015676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004881418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091864925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396715385","doi":"10.29173/mlj1274","title":"The Duty as Legislative Counsel as Guardians of the Statue Book: Sui Generis or a Professional Duty of Lawyers?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Duty; Statute; Legislature; Jurisdiction; Legislation; Political science; Exclusive jurisdiction; Guardian; Legislative history","score_opus":0.02375447599015624,"score_gpt":0.2983545051274965,"score_spread":0.2746000291373403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396715385","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6525358,0.00430385,0.000024356788,0.02464565,0.004864157,0.00074826175,0.00020520529,0.000026204294,0.3126465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99624234,0.00058174855,0.000017546876,0.000955917,0.0004556196,0.000024655556,8.385326e-7,0.000006175019,0.0017151642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740994,0.00060933235,0.00033182377,0.000115070136,0.0012416185,0.0002922204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987982,0.00033118247,0.00037768646,0.00011485884,0.0003092592,0.000068834706],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012109898,0.000102815044,0.0001905241,0.000020870952,0.008043517,0.000051050658,0.00052865146,0.00003710543,0.0006087272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018788957,0.00005514005,0.00017822944,0.00025748555,0.0016785173,0.00014079177,0.00021532363,0.0004220201,0.000008378238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040648252,0.00017452815,0.0039751297,0.0000048292636,0.00027789694,0.00003921459,0.019194886,0.00009019815,0.00015699548,0.95409316,0.018948242,0.002638432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031780955,0.0001400811,0.0039742645,0.000030774732,0.000047652247,0.00004923031,0.17510405,0.0000024712465,0.00013322664,0.051083934,0.76900977,0.000106744264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07927645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2810291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90300924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019191555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012143945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99324787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396802195","doi":"10.1080/20403313.2024.2342194","title":"Can the constitutional state accommodate the administrative state? Rousseau versus Hegel","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; State (computer science); Political science; Law; Constitutional law; General will; Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.06618698031715846,"score_gpt":0.3740557401148728,"score_spread":0.30786875979771433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396802195","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21121009,0.013749478,0.0021801528,0.32399836,0.009911927,0.0016783162,0.00093725295,0.00065016147,0.4356843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970372,0.00083834166,0.000018410194,0.00051388325,0.0003976249,0.000061967374,0.0000039615206,0.0000039599627,0.0011246712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984049,0.00017782408,0.00018038662,0.00024692374,0.00063714985,0.0003527955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987134,0.0008872759,0.00004635026,0.00015249023,0.000120733006,0.000079777994],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064413436,0.00013181346,0.00011105352,0.000024343102,0.0023052096,0.0003432927,0.00050878176,0.00003478682,0.000107749875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021485293,0.00007285042,0.00008211302,0.00042733937,0.0052366443,0.00021764844,0.00011740774,0.00028695658,0.00022303274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004482765,0.000017576796,0.00037768623,0.0000032199537,0.00008400604,0.000039171144,0.008771077,0.00006884988,0.000009334916,0.9823991,0.0050535416,0.003131589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001922363,0.00006633169,0.00547241,0.00007378473,0.00005064182,0.0000067208916,0.0070315395,0.000068909954,0.00008634579,0.19140111,0.7952948,0.00025514196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005793776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024800623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79099804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016235987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018387833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99899364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396857870","doi":"10.62355/ejels.21907","title":"Which Constitutional Provisions Are Most Important?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European journal of empirical legal studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Computer science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.08724960345109178,"score_gpt":0.3854071406493285,"score_spread":0.29815753719823673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396857870","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03411811,0.10354175,0.0017248957,0.1361306,0.0061015156,0.00030016238,0.00007514175,0.00022983704,0.71777797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932715,0.0032683525,0.00019809249,0.00060923205,0.0020106412,0.0000015656572,8.389424e-7,0.000008906411,0.0006308446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752486,0.00053069735,0.0006760579,0.00020330008,0.0007551713,0.00030994267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812806,0.0004975434,0.00021743358,0.00006811468,0.0009009779,0.00018785759],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00235724,0.00016259919,0.00034225502,0.00012533307,0.0012349358,0.0001839622,0.00026578206,0.000027899412,0.00008126899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032025895,0.00011390102,0.00018621332,0.0007418448,0.00284503,0.0003896144,0.00013750498,0.0004172665,0.00013813339],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053674208,0.00013860562,0.013692686,0.00002658359,0.00082121877,0.0021403632,0.0046058083,0.000047593712,0.000027984766,0.79534656,0.17871812,0.0043808105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016145139,0.000105476014,0.008008829,0.00036325192,0.00009346335,0.000079085716,0.0059586256,0.000005289679,0.000004482013,0.004960294,0.9800931,0.00016664511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000050587852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031764878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9591534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001652987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008100838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396998963","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4817313","title":"The Frontiers of Nullification and Anticommandeering: Federalism and Extrajudicial Constitutional Interpretation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Nullification; Federalism; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Constitutional interpretation; Law and economics; Law; Constitutional law; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Politics","score_opus":0.009889120692077296,"score_gpt":0.2713139148776738,"score_spread":0.2614247941855965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396998963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3687411,0.3562831,0.20608713,0.036706686,0.0033955092,0.0004793222,0.000010315204,0.0001046776,0.028192174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9663187,0.033266574,0.000032823606,0.000023047853,0.00022623647,0.000002501638,6.604536e-7,0.0000018668575,0.00012754975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913,0.000062813095,0.00014503393,0.00008360357,0.00018716857,0.00039139285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997368,0.00010076665,0.000044365388,0.00002192281,0.00006376915,0.000032404143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011079609,0.000052075306,0.00007402067,0.000040685045,0.0012316607,0.00013798838,0.00006363425,0.000032267948,0.0000018934087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010242547,0.000038067363,0.000030145979,0.000086855405,0.0014669842,0.00016146572,0.000015128133,0.00031321554,0.000001309962],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017897313,0.000004084662,0.0012751255,0.000001623969,0.00007078386,4.7923396e-7,0.0009929225,0.0000016584786,0.000038841994,0.95407015,0.000101478276,0.04342496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011611492,0.00004207052,0.0017712539,0.000037164635,0.00004047742,0.000043840457,0.0097859325,0.000249682,0.00001008523,0.96022075,0.027610486,0.000072117815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039588625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020318837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59757763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015774528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011106392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94730633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398135832","doi":"10.4324/9781003279112-5","title":"Using Network Citation Analysis to Reveal Precedential Archetypes at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Archetype; Citation; Law; Political science; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.05433416707905229,"score_gpt":0.3003604556769294,"score_spread":0.24602628859787715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398135832","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006500767,0.00091486203,0.00020783555,0.0031585025,0.00067506573,0.0002087186,0.00006480503,0.000014386886,0.99410576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21811607,0.00012150811,0.0001379084,0.00028913916,0.0011584852,0.000004882942,0.00002051907,0.000009139554,0.78014237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870026,0.000025810996,0.00022165726,0.00019096232,0.0006715174,0.00018979225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994363,0.0001378771,0.000088390276,0.00008838378,0.00018805235,0.00006098978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003561581,0.00011301323,0.00024323964,0.00006204869,0.000686437,0.000028311048,0.0001510734,0.000077669785,0.0008590968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039439794,0.00008207117,0.00015627085,0.00023782825,0.00029013198,0.000021610804,0.00012792021,0.000094326235,0.00001474394],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014002871,0.0000017525037,0.00024009132,0.000006083789,0.0013790888,0.000002873718,0.0008355892,0.0035486354,0.0000040236946,0.9508123,0.042857554,0.0002979996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003850167,0.000014863376,0.0010019204,0.00012358009,0.0025774215,5.0814646e-7,0.0008493378,0.00008221286,0.0000076157567,0.16203262,0.8329428,0.00032864275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8158777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99478024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7900852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042457727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090005726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94065076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398139013","doi":"10.4324/9781003279112-2","title":"A Bird's-Eye View of the Canadian Supreme Court","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Optometry; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.03910227870302863,"score_gpt":0.27585021066634585,"score_spread":0.23674793196331723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398139013","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000043716764,0.004092155,3.9129344e-7,0.017080469,0.0008328357,0.00018902507,0.000039184873,0.00006167135,0.9776999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12161642,0.0010577417,0.00000551618,0.000698628,0.0004253878,0.00000478612,6.567739e-7,0.000017479002,0.8761734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911636,0.000009960298,0.00015184096,0.00014257903,0.00040600484,0.00017323278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960697,0.000027705704,0.00004362877,0.00010422899,0.00012670187,0.00009079654],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018599878,0.000110973844,0.00018677667,0.000050204402,0.0006509227,0.00003198514,0.0002605321,0.00015837634,0.001627433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026641692,0.00007095463,0.00016677166,0.000055927147,0.0010240991,0.00002088885,0.000066816225,0.00016904299,0.000835808],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.5022833e-7,0.0000010836438,0.00011035757,0.0000074874206,0.000057035868,0.0000028579846,0.00034508193,1.08467994e-7,2.2651639e-7,0.98677397,0.012034645,0.00066679326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008792269,0.0000027150354,0.00009932769,0.00011945294,0.00003846605,1.6053717e-7,0.000090373345,1.2251438e-7,3.143904e-7,0.29037717,0.70919484,0.00006825442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9012538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6971602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023049854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019133964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398152047","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4368319","title":"Rights and Federalism: Rethinking the Connections","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Democracy; Fundamental rights; Jurisdiction; Law; Cooperative federalism; Charter; Economic Justice; Human rights; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.017725780851150442,"score_gpt":0.28715745991145514,"score_spread":0.2694316790603047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398152047","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3514768,0.13868935,0.0047481772,0.22575822,0.0039795716,0.0003563644,0.0000042135375,0.00032410404,0.27466318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99049556,0.006061581,0.0000065992476,0.00017580474,0.001008249,0.0000029104815,1.909791e-7,0.0000026293928,0.0022464497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881077,0.00009506203,0.00008707255,0.00008795441,0.00020108403,0.00071806356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997335,0.00014167182,0.000019806075,0.000027690623,0.0000433351,0.000033986125],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014677246,0.000052226693,0.00005727421,0.00003093864,0.004066511,0.000268729,0.000095723815,0.000034197037,0.000026600457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057290676,0.000031562377,0.00004687296,0.00015893533,0.00035063858,0.00014809317,0.000019051282,0.00083532784,0.000018955354],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001895123,0.000002902377,0.00007805398,4.413626e-7,0.00006733054,0.000002734059,0.0036889503,8.387557e-7,0.0000044441445,0.9922262,0.00044371354,0.003482499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031409738,0.000016492457,0.000075121556,0.000015241956,0.000019713732,0.00008807867,0.0049691703,0.000006611858,0.0000012898199,0.82784045,0.16689475,0.000041664633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007262948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07554835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6390188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030964395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001281838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99934775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398198849","doi":"10.3726/b19826","title":"Judicial Activism in Comparative Perspective","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Peter Lang Verlag eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Political science; Judicial activism; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Computer science; Judicial review; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.054108104610744445,"score_gpt":0.33636273244726095,"score_spread":0.2822546278365165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398198849","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003423692,0.0011862987,0.000004257346,0.0003213057,0.00090161874,0.0003179349,0.000058624762,0.00011746772,0.9967501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21280602,0.000040574192,0.000018039325,0.00025138707,0.0020591721,0.00005087364,0.000010854447,0.00001981578,0.78474325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856025,0.000088368695,0.00018497817,0.00038352638,0.00045593054,0.00032694396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994955,0.00015299662,0.00007073004,0.000097312084,0.000115129245,0.00006831869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019924631,0.0002301783,0.00041489737,0.00023671649,0.00030441597,0.00008260753,0.00020927604,0.00022220632,0.00010550453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034120512,0.00021765247,0.00015723963,0.000073724244,0.0008028153,0.000052249914,0.00011013167,0.00053498626,0.00072166143],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021254027,0.000012958305,0.000016407086,0.000009130065,0.00010871898,0.00010346337,0.031833816,3.2204676e-7,0.000003900483,0.94213575,0.025310967,0.00044331542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001215971,0.000026960752,0.0001610114,0.00025563996,0.000060433696,0.000001208023,0.003278292,8.628345e-7,0.0000047242042,0.2830731,0.7127378,0.00027838297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005273512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034248237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6874268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011355893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012119925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98337424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398206455","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192898579.013.37","title":"Developing Judicial Independence","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Political science; Law; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.0521648806554091,"score_gpt":0.2598777042676884,"score_spread":0.20771282361227933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398206455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000014914602,0.0003759935,0.00016119704,0.00027893818,0.0007286681,0.00021579098,0.000055813685,0.00018331788,0.99798536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00470547,0.0012928767,0.00008754488,0.00009241189,0.0005769294,6.510223e-7,0.0000056343224,0.000014765666,0.9932237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986807,0.000019594732,0.00012514088,0.00034928482,0.0005482504,0.00027699233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994811,0.00005794012,0.00008832305,0.00011340168,0.00016165175,0.00009760636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015114865,0.0002075804,0.0002462737,0.000115047966,0.0010441832,0.00006684344,0.00041765155,0.00037841088,0.000060293816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014624664,0.00023986744,0.00014863587,0.000015542151,0.0008963459,0.000084644635,0.0003942007,0.0004296209,0.000016838405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016615344,0.0000016282912,0.0000035268527,0.000012814387,0.00011134119,0.00016068062,0.00080122356,4.7955325e-7,3.8222123e-7,0.9942989,0.0010583315,0.003534126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006169557,0.000008538296,0.000004154185,0.00019406492,0.000102298334,0.0000010969483,0.00031123776,5.095342e-7,0.000002711509,0.15642552,0.84263563,0.0002525562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032924013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035962176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8415773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045130623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080543064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.978151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398327393","doi":"10.7910/dvn/kgritg","title":"Replication Data for: Social Capital, Institutional Rules, and Constitutional Amendment Rates","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Replication (statistics); Amendment; Social capital; Political science; Constitutional amendment; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Constitution; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09633984660403472,"score_gpt":0.35250910137605956,"score_spread":0.25616925477202485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398327393","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004054823,0.000028326263,0.00030137372,0.0004999846,0.0011002234,0.0006769015,0.99657106,0.00009281954,0.00068873743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00017691232,0.0027087897,0.00019659771,0.00034831918,0.0017737582,0.00017186909,0.99445266,0.0000075383355,0.0001635624],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975411,0.00009702083,0.00036880336,0.0009198902,0.00067573524,0.00039744907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983016,0.00025973885,0.00022213074,0.0008709262,0.00021178504,0.00013377999],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010688292,0.00025944348,0.00033842164,0.00012765858,0.00328294,0.0002016538,0.00094659365,0.0002711879,0.0005808261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014651393,0.00027127995,0.000071904375,0.00018140732,0.007221684,0.00053680886,0.0009579701,0.00022024287,0.014737227],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023489805,0.0000445175,0.00000688004,0.000028450995,0.00010148262,0.0000081347525,0.00007702253,7.1725674e-7,0.000001822135,0.3054215,0.69406956,0.00021639279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036402757,0.000015550948,0.00008492577,0.000055036548,0.0001720701,0.0000040953632,0.0006569718,0.0000054880375,6.215779e-7,0.007684985,0.99064285,0.0003134027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007888246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053722486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29773653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002672208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016371126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398763511","doi":"10.29173/mlj941","title":"Interview with Gerald Nemiroff","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychoanalysis; Psychology; History","score_opus":0.04209474687983891,"score_gpt":0.2765440991623401,"score_spread":0.23444935228250116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398763511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.111734554,0.0016100814,0.0024845756,0.09285276,0.0014545495,0.0001887145,0.0000063776115,0.00010584353,0.7895625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965542,0.00046997232,0.00010336077,0.0015033627,0.001149099,0.0000033030583,8.1759275e-8,0.0000039106344,0.00021269057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915713,0.000100172365,0.00012126034,0.000081884566,0.00030745356,0.0002321263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996085,0.00005285112,0.00006365939,0.00004688638,0.00012145219,0.000106657244],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038915,0.00006767668,0.00010106134,0.00001865197,0.0014446039,0.00008617829,0.00016951855,0.000027950227,0.00037561124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003124333,0.00003515733,0.000050761642,0.00007514505,0.00059542403,0.00022873085,0.00003151851,0.00009219849,0.00017418321],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019816263,0.000030077206,0.0034672546,0.0000016281091,0.000053599244,0.000065337255,0.00042063912,1.999497e-7,0.000042005948,0.87879837,0.006278391,0.110822655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028603966,0.00005784958,0.0038160284,0.00015939225,0.000018116234,0.00005773618,0.0051235957,4.703767e-8,0.000025907728,0.071569994,0.91877,0.00011529369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012516741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30697787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9124916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000109747925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007497933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399160098","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2024.7","title":"Democracy and the Notwithstanding Clause","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Charter; Political science; Legislature; Constitution; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Law and economics; Skepticism; Context (archaeology); Politics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024353848710301627,"score_gpt":0.30063889887322603,"score_spread":0.27628505016292443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399160098","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21300703,0.13899119,0.0012877054,0.20851238,0.008184535,0.0004222958,0.00003241495,0.000050245235,0.4295122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99755377,0.00096660655,0.000048736078,0.0006584953,0.0005278959,7.567002e-7,5.1593116e-8,0.0000031263878,0.00024056516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992412,0.00008274456,0.00016779965,0.00007317535,0.00022462121,0.00021045945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992197,0.0002972133,0.000048211783,0.000041655047,0.00011023056,0.00028295277],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093223527,0.000057461417,0.00011737222,0.000054722026,0.0015061642,0.00028453363,0.00019690323,0.00003403777,0.000064809225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023269425,0.000036917474,0.00005898051,0.00017844554,0.0020299912,0.0002791722,0.000011341881,0.00019491556,0.000012751701],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069048147,7.953605e-7,0.00092380133,0.0000030308838,0.000026809717,0.00016528406,0.0057540457,0.0000026262808,0.000003308024,0.9903041,0.0015700664,0.0012392184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018073617,0.00001970041,0.0011624945,0.0002717238,0.00005827066,0.00008538012,0.002001921,0.000011511231,0.0000069025123,0.27265835,0.72344965,0.000093386065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09756878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31611532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78454673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001277565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015012964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399280637","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjae017","title":"The Frontiers of Nullification and Anticommandeering: Federalism and Extrajudicial Constitutional Interpretation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Nullification; Federalism; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Constitutional law; Constitutional interpretation; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Politics","score_opus":0.017363851217235687,"score_gpt":0.2830628415839839,"score_spread":0.26569899036674827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399280637","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5402504,0.13713579,0.04553257,0.23156658,0.008344033,0.0006717196,0.000026630116,0.000071759045,0.03640051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99336815,0.005907871,0.00010265965,0.00014952847,0.00037219748,0.0000019817426,6.624975e-7,0.000002602115,0.00009432408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989478,0.0001704397,0.00031423723,0.00006941702,0.00036592057,0.00013219682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990915,0.0004090446,0.00016065969,0.00004287212,0.00023927988,0.000056656925],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015224164,0.00007264929,0.00013565723,0.00006644697,0.0014905874,0.00040709638,0.00014912605,0.00003895637,0.000004496876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032612504,0.00004171357,0.000053003423,0.00013384542,0.0022131992,0.00039777826,0.000036230897,0.00016848337,8.121341e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007083586,0.000013075504,0.0012422124,0.000007957368,0.00014225116,0.0000028605673,0.007333349,0.000011284448,0.00013409882,0.9634765,0.0064213565,0.021144256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007543169,0.00017194219,0.03730702,0.00037225336,0.0003772704,0.00024750532,0.023981621,0.0013747953,0.00014549126,0.42464802,0.5102729,0.00034683174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00061647577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036576192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53882843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044041884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002498864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399403066","doi":"10.1515/9782760644779-008","title":"La Cour D’appel Fédérale Dans Le Système Judiciaire: Appels Auprès De La Cour Suprême Du Canada","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Humanities","score_opus":0.008612619449676248,"score_gpt":0.18289157669921388,"score_spread":0.17427895724953762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399403066","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03652147,0.019395502,0.0006792926,0.0029269825,0.0005216888,0.00038230902,0.0005379539,0.00013260914,0.9389022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8885275,0.004646825,0.00016890503,0.0004281337,0.0006825568,0.000016373273,0.000045920762,0.00006252406,0.10542127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962531,0.0006960125,0.00042822052,0.000698425,0.0008722192,0.0010520365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975895,0.00087654253,0.000366455,0.0003359544,0.00029253852,0.0005389874],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005395789,0.00066133245,0.0008376717,0.00008590263,0.003406865,0.00014710084,0.0008868339,0.00091596413,0.0005723803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013110547,0.00079003983,0.00040523536,0.00008525718,0.0028923482,0.00012904976,0.0007446823,0.0008981316,0.000040087154],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012638526,0.00007964098,0.009414997,0.0001470689,0.00090998993,0.007168425,0.0064769024,0.0005063147,0.0002929704,0.9435754,0.019626254,0.0116756465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007228981,0.00004540893,0.008717919,0.0006176076,0.0006716124,0.0003620135,0.010981663,0.000103157065,0.00018010229,0.022095695,0.9546121,0.00088987726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9843592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98587745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9349858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006338054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006537374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399639556","doi":"10.59962/9780774870061-012","title":"10 Women’s Charter Equality at the Supreme Court of Canada: Surprising Losses or Anticipated Failures?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.035427779542269285,"score_gpt":0.22513953237719692,"score_spread":0.18971175283492764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399639556","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013111841,0.00065009703,0.000001945613,0.00016800471,0.00024575487,0.0003666555,0.0018141766,0.00004001283,0.9836015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22634652,0.00019639955,0.0000032364817,0.000027346881,0.00007278694,7.932564e-7,0.00000962086,0.000009758977,0.77333355],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982518,0.0000706111,0.0002582252,0.00032029414,0.00075570645,0.00034337034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882346,0.0001790665,0.0002598653,0.00018341976,0.00044276196,0.000111435285],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037485373,0.00012752914,0.00047042876,0.000023445924,0.0009769776,0.00009048465,0.00042837264,0.0001941321,0.0041040885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044925673,0.00019119111,0.00013443103,0.000020431375,0.0023274685,0.000054312044,0.00038910427,0.00020575232,0.0000082571605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004909109,0.00008478718,0.0003106814,0.0006998529,0.002527352,0.0014263173,0.01803451,0.000007219006,0.000019747366,0.12632616,0.84031177,0.009760714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001884356,0.000038071263,0.00037988348,0.00055536494,0.00016022044,0.0000052491428,0.0021368098,0.0000010917904,0.0000025318514,0.003055446,0.9932399,0.00023701611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9947972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99939424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21323468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063516776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014442042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399661526","doi":"10.2307/jj.16040332.5","title":"The Canadian Judicial System","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.026781051669376558,"score_gpt":0.21035481611951173,"score_spread":0.18357376445013518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399661526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000024510443,0.0017416119,0.0000064316696,0.00016125354,0.00064146484,0.00021495417,0.00004889575,0.00005609762,0.9971268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012069788,0.00029011094,0.000008075177,0.000022624537,0.00028149257,2.5223906e-7,0.0000035485702,0.000008021472,0.9873161],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999115,0.000024154839,0.0001006729,0.00016883395,0.00037945897,0.00021190355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944335,0.00006969058,0.000075436634,0.000115718714,0.00014988822,0.00014594311],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018419589,0.00011764734,0.0001849273,0.00006144827,0.0024259093,0.000041260293,0.00037027217,0.00022600727,0.000029486484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006682453,0.00010994422,0.00014930076,0.000006978239,0.0018592596,0.000021328184,0.00011320566,0.00023660394,0.000058297792],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000114219365,5.855646e-7,9.685784e-7,0.000014445943,0.00012283408,0.000086330576,0.001101587,1.8991028e-7,1.0967639e-7,0.99314815,0.0023712253,0.0031421485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042720585,0.000008325021,0.0000050745357,0.00017326389,0.0001336741,8.241043e-7,0.0005577866,0.0000034378013,5.0841265e-7,0.033072766,0.9658883,0.00011330613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87898755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97219384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96351707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043512628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011662525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399661804","doi":"10.2307/jj.16040332.4","title":"The Rule of Law in the Canadian Constitution","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Political science; Rule of law","score_opus":0.034447488980426634,"score_gpt":0.22859483179922976,"score_spread":0.19414734281880314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399661804","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000014012828,0.0011477799,0.0000033888641,0.00032677702,0.00015689238,0.00020179921,0.000037753158,0.000007767559,0.99810386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21615684,0.0006808798,0.000017210323,0.00017383305,0.0001150955,6.7537593e-7,0.0000083929,0.0000051875236,0.7828419],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936867,0.00003296053,0.00009392884,0.00010076677,0.00027936103,0.00012434009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960184,0.000109615234,0.000064185355,0.0000976614,0.00008698936,0.000039730694],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026291484,0.000074120275,0.00012871862,0.000042174626,0.0009491908,0.00001760069,0.00033806122,0.00013082214,0.00001879139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008746909,0.000056376997,0.0000871054,0.000008228015,0.0040824735,0.000023998422,0.000058696056,0.00019290946,0.0000068261493],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009132488,0.0000016913119,0.0000033637743,0.000007278742,0.00003913988,0.000027648895,0.0038088625,6.8391563e-7,3.5326082e-7,0.99492216,0.00026124666,0.0009184133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000449883,0.000006498532,0.0000169697,0.0000848366,0.000049815768,4.5736567e-7,0.00046788683,0.0000011656209,0.0000016612698,0.12525918,0.8740128,0.000053687472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9026552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97694254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8737516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012125593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067156064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99862784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400073978","doi":"10.1515/9781773855714-024","title":"Appendix A: Canadian Code of Ethics for Psychologists, Fourth Edition","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Separation of powers; Computer science; Political science; Law; Programming language; Constitution","score_opus":0.09494943315595505,"score_gpt":0.295737166391423,"score_spread":0.20078773323546795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400073978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000043756304,0.00056756067,0.0007048261,0.0003482448,0.0005000431,0.0003435459,0.0010490072,0.000027214028,0.9964552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0047507654,0.0011603652,0.0004255714,0.00013907743,0.0003391707,0.0000011011401,0.00017108346,0.000013237799,0.9929996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991954,0.000022531198,0.00012306329,0.00020277388,0.0002888426,0.00016738557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992738,0.00013482355,0.00012712592,0.00009953377,0.00025592395,0.00010884378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025069257,0.00011498941,0.00024316658,0.000109164175,0.00047981128,0.000007918438,0.00025646368,0.0004263619,0.00010776891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030486353,0.00013687383,0.00017376035,0.0000073683373,0.0015529566,0.000029754627,0.00005845609,0.00030201153,0.00001590405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033024415,0.0000037420332,0.000002076996,0.000063653664,0.00012138516,0.000018933819,0.0018687708,0.0000010953371,0.0000011575318,0.9893105,0.0069833198,0.0015923341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011076782,0.000034009423,0.000005657722,0.00017675135,0.00014503267,4.4819546e-7,0.000274661,0.0000030655178,0.0000044365615,0.11565748,0.88347024,0.00011747239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41081905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7044575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8764869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001297658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008109415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59310436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400074304","doi":"10.1515/9781773855714-045","title":"5.8 The Challenge of Judging Supreme Court of Canada Judges","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.028471685861097377,"score_gpt":0.2123259285902185,"score_spread":0.18385424272912113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400074304","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000042932435,0.003490924,0.000009004076,0.00036548654,0.00022095405,0.00015215058,0.000062473075,0.000012788905,0.99564326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06683478,0.0024306136,0.000019542784,0.000014037051,0.00009256408,2.1677079e-7,0.0000032471523,0.000009284853,0.9305957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900097,0.000023292407,0.00016001808,0.00014688795,0.0005200429,0.00014879373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992363,0.00016532092,0.00018822188,0.00013441185,0.000224893,0.000050880768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018198305,0.000111961584,0.00028234403,0.00003556379,0.0004474834,0.0000047000535,0.0003674199,0.00011376043,0.00007048363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016456816,0.00010283312,0.00012774454,0.000007165153,0.0016266163,0.000021238873,0.00020196741,0.00016365676,7.1252236e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024760713,0.0000033506851,0.0000061435476,0.00005159517,0.00020670673,0.00001626119,0.001747416,0.0000013472085,0.000002017958,0.99417764,0.0013411609,0.0024215789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000727173,0.000019353676,0.000021120635,0.00021537751,0.00013404425,1.8155461e-7,0.0008844278,0.000004415126,0.000016338003,0.051194686,0.94733363,0.00010368335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6913749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86984795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94599247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001061082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000964945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5993336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400083081","doi":"10.1093/9780191991288.001.0001","title":"Shared Rule in Federal Theory and Practice","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.0327778276988274,"score_gpt":0.32969100009233554,"score_spread":0.2969131723935081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400083081","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000013337167,0.007393498,0.000005630737,0.0047556143,0.000303918,0.00011964341,0.000013365464,0.000048659444,0.98734635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0035657503,0.0011731596,0.000056383797,0.0010196499,0.0005387053,0.000011819772,0.000006597678,0.000005698885,0.99362224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924165,0.00012895337,0.00010180095,0.00018031178,0.00021885574,0.00012845268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990587,0.00079729524,0.000028086022,0.000033867145,0.000045295645,0.000036718055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000891424,0.00008671143,0.00013481488,0.0000456109,0.00030739105,0.00012459826,0.00007086774,0.0001285642,0.00037729196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069741526,0.0000727352,0.000032131484,0.00005333476,0.0004686983,0.00012835594,0.000086859254,0.0001854004,0.00027076263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016090098,0.0000062391396,0.000019957868,0.000006279599,0.000027297245,0.000027548149,0.0016295528,4.2484785e-8,1.4087425e-7,0.9487962,0.047925375,0.0015452921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022041631,0.0000028712539,0.00006425133,0.000047043155,0.0000098431055,9.916369e-7,0.0017073445,4.4054218e-8,2.9983003e-8,0.50009024,0.49799544,0.000059866423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039051808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008669126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45007005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001424961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069606304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59034914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400115270","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-51093-9_7","title":"Constitutional Referendums and Elite Cooperation in Western Federal Systems","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Federalism and internal conflicts","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Elite; Political science; Political economy; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.05094544645755327,"score_gpt":0.2976279212633356,"score_spread":0.24668247480578231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400115270","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032329932,0.019337043,0.000037222486,0.0016293582,0.001567628,0.00032973054,0.00012686668,0.000060335067,0.9736788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4853929,0.008420742,0.0000064283035,0.000694826,0.0010994979,0.000020065947,0.000052047726,0.000012037961,0.5043015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985928,0.00004418721,0.0003717979,0.00040232023,0.00034872888,0.00024017219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994999,0.0000672579,0.00009286054,0.00006429964,0.00013871615,0.00013694738],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002840853,0.00026940615,0.00038495718,0.00010185531,0.0006657243,0.00071633566,0.00009876605,0.00028620724,0.00008121123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003711355,0.00024531657,0.000053892087,0.000025905452,0.0013821837,0.00019803015,0.000121223595,0.00046530465,0.000076323166],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022521746,0.0000051013267,0.00018210361,0.000036708603,0.000070776245,0.00007120249,0.0017102915,0.0000012201202,0.000005044917,0.995998,0.0009330994,0.000963914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027636735,0.000036653393,0.00045053367,0.0014857635,0.000031236756,0.000037420235,0.00021204133,0.000017880899,6.437289e-7,0.018464515,0.97867846,0.00030847732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019068496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014246003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97774535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001217232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014411182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400115340","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-51093-9_12","title":"Federalism and the Protection of Fundamental Rights: Between Standardization/Centralization and Subsidiarity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Federalism and internal conflicts","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Federalism; Standardization; Political science; Business; Law; International trade; European union","score_opus":0.034488491416131556,"score_gpt":0.27837187644623534,"score_spread":0.2438833850301038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400115340","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020275306,0.013649184,0.0006484436,0.009330955,0.0010909064,0.0015200904,0.00058054825,0.00009601704,0.95280856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9369124,0.004227641,0.000007766386,0.00020042398,0.0006513062,0.000013386765,0.00003810856,0.000012861901,0.05793609],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880666,0.00006168744,0.00031732995,0.0002770418,0.00038141967,0.00015584394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994446,0.00007082511,0.00017916341,0.00006022972,0.00015807031,0.000087099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035516603,0.00020455016,0.0003602649,0.00006680159,0.0011023738,0.00038784716,0.000079609024,0.00019153145,0.00006812551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035515364,0.00014528647,0.0000692727,0.000030746705,0.001754077,0.00016305555,0.00011957291,0.00023278643,0.000003959902],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006281973,0.000003179384,0.0003197953,0.00004612346,0.00017945292,0.000003227206,0.0058375583,1.7398517e-7,0.0000046458676,0.99259806,0.00032012237,0.0006248378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067333045,0.00005714496,0.0011349269,0.00045696998,0.00018095727,0.000007972968,0.00026717407,0.000012326481,0.000023736602,0.25551054,0.74145955,0.00021537783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019416546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003834663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9166371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006159416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056203342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98711324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400256968","doi":"10.4324/9781032723952","title":"Supermajority Voting in Constitutional Courts","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University","keywords":"Voting; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03415131984384824,"score_gpt":0.3047415275738949,"score_spread":0.27059020773004666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400256968","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000032895212,0.0027981675,0.000055770794,0.0021577638,0.001394021,0.00018365665,0.000053816893,0.00011387728,0.99321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.116307884,0.00032100643,0.000038772956,0.00036952065,0.001885396,0.000016501204,0.00003604318,0.000006296547,0.8810186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865615,0.000038779497,0.00023378922,0.00027409568,0.0005219464,0.00027523754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996051,0.00015945331,0.00003263441,0.00004765809,0.000086122454,0.00006900687],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046181548,0.00015127043,0.00024358774,0.000113881026,0.00047569428,0.00006833954,0.00015492293,0.0002439141,0.0009682224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012487012,0.00014204768,0.000104980885,0.00010102058,0.0028982777,0.000087691384,0.000095647236,0.00038904627,0.00093735947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014719668,0.0000101474525,0.00045745206,0.00001060277,0.00002430258,0.00005603887,0.00042692423,0.0000016796398,1.6269243e-7,0.92898846,0.06970048,0.00032229238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043663662,0.0000027890958,0.00007599708,0.00016885146,0.000017408167,0.0000014280532,0.00018687244,0.0000025709978,1.7358933e-7,0.26055256,0.73879844,0.00014921516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005133112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029342156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.669098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063067203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037335416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400472676","doi":"10.1515/9781773855196","title":"Law, Politics, and the Judicial Process in Canada, 5th Edition","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law; Political science; Process (computing); Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.016052976887278556,"score_gpt":0.21938996603028374,"score_spread":0.2033369891430052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400472676","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014095035,0.0008882468,0.000008107444,0.00030305743,0.00028940715,0.00025118774,0.00006587912,0.000013500576,0.99803966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19529627,0.0007641563,0.000011845883,0.00046664182,0.0008582571,0.0000021564667,0.000028740174,0.000014591087,0.80255735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991402,0.000068932466,0.0001018534,0.00015858904,0.00036722646,0.00016317496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961114,0.000116233365,0.000070092436,0.000057378118,0.00009208181,0.00005310356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001451696,0.000097768396,0.00022974466,0.00003469739,0.00045634163,0.000013408006,0.00019339567,0.00010336621,0.000013627866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015835469,0.00009044696,0.000046601137,0.000012572904,0.0024431325,0.000035373636,0.000107407126,0.00022997998,0.0000010596032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034932073,0.0000025768313,0.000008338605,0.000039452632,0.000042263062,0.00003515427,0.0039083944,8.498991e-7,3.512363e-8,0.9912936,0.0042049815,0.00042939154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003600558,0.000007276213,0.000056322067,0.00023455577,0.00012348646,6.481666e-7,0.001941549,0.000013895973,0.0000015703696,0.26934657,0.727784,0.00013009334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.993655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9961533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.723579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041322186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003868553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90018237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400487288","doi":"10.4337/ccs.2024.01.05","title":"Giving individual remedies in social rights litigation their due","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Constitutional Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Neglect; Law and economics; Political science; Transformative learning; Economics; Business; Law; Democracy; Sociology; Politics; Medicine","score_opus":0.20013886921196294,"score_gpt":0.41017101197632033,"score_spread":0.2100321427643574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400487288","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36014086,0.09871545,0.0013983076,0.020005735,0.0049887206,0.0010610558,0.00034575557,0.00062246853,0.51272166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975564,0.00045588487,0.000074943164,0.00012633612,0.0013388055,0.0001055144,0.000018782664,0.0000025855545,0.0003207721],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820757,0.00022630468,0.00033608876,0.00034579574,0.00052658917,0.00035764725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874127,0.00078316807,0.00005535237,0.000044726366,0.00032135972,0.000054127122],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066954986,0.0002052696,0.00039515123,0.0001906821,0.0031078148,0.00013123637,0.00017302319,0.00007642496,0.00007787452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022696648,0.00016657182,0.00010882044,0.0006597096,0.008444082,0.00044125738,0.00013223724,0.00024001319,0.00011543147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010403137,0.000035280038,0.00160448,0.0000143654,0.00027198772,0.00002690047,0.04147405,0.000019633002,0.000018981103,0.9473915,0.008648293,0.00048409315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024673055,0.00002409476,0.019410115,0.00037903996,0.000041834646,0.0000054448183,0.035384577,0.00002865933,0.0001030785,0.47917303,0.4648441,0.0003592789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006228424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0078041772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6374155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038137584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005744153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400725596","doi":"10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-041822-030149","title":"Abortion Law Illiberalism and Feminist Politics in Comparative Perspective","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Law and Social Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Politics; Abortion; Law; Political science; Sociology; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.03903105093705932,"score_gpt":0.40153405244315177,"score_spread":0.36250300150609244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400725596","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014241891,0.08142002,0.0000031733377,0.008054689,0.00015978012,0.00020759941,0.000052810505,0.000019161682,0.8958409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825581,0.014892245,0.000016224938,0.002374745,0.00009855761,0.000005691695,5.9289385e-7,0.0000011199942,0.000052730855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910295,0.00006563558,0.00015211884,0.00018132658,0.00031631795,0.00018162232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996101,0.00008266854,0.00003363828,0.000024143405,0.00019778677,0.000051621548],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007674925,0.00006114732,0.00019399128,0.00002376086,0.0009608448,0.00005882946,0.00008539638,0.000027484974,0.000006637248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004624291,0.0000509534,0.00002955109,0.0003607054,0.0064200084,0.00030794984,0.000050069113,0.00007242532,0.0000022607308],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.458858e-7,0.000010827228,0.00002949187,0.000085094674,0.0000036802232,0.0000016513665,0.04675639,7.0475994e-9,0.0000047357357,0.9527028,0.00006629483,0.0003382841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000098692944,0.000055497683,0.002321122,0.0018647618,0.000041104064,0.0000022827737,0.06762128,0.000002369038,0.000018294642,0.32168838,0.6060845,0.00020166309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020887168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030177967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9683162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007889165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022901026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99628395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400885501","doi":"10.59704/3e11a38eb6763cff","title":"Administrative and Citizen Interpretations of Unwritten Constitutional Principles and Constitutional Silences","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Constitutional interpretation; Law; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.07768356991447932,"score_gpt":0.3596523530040353,"score_spread":0.281968783089556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400885501","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059376016,0.012197781,0.004075214,0.009396661,0.0011058061,0.00077382714,0.0013285874,0.00014766338,0.91159844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99648094,0.0014964561,0.001041049,0.0000976865,0.00021545813,0.0000615466,0.00003052874,0.0000025090008,0.000573848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984994,0.00009366428,0.00038278298,0.0004142398,0.00042414494,0.00018575562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989413,0.00043566825,0.00013708802,0.00007409073,0.00029183234,0.00012003652],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037317246,0.00019855906,0.00033528052,0.00012175026,0.0006344449,0.0001289726,0.00014829416,0.00019083655,0.00018069729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039996122,0.0001741353,0.00008334307,0.00012784629,0.04493449,0.000082581675,0.00067598984,0.0003245331,0.000010100676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010957943,0.000027361617,0.003934109,0.00007176767,0.00018389299,0.0000072184616,0.0023137827,0.00001732625,0.000010611501,0.9927083,0.00024231437,0.00047230913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001788077,0.000053031905,0.004063664,0.0009286493,0.00022009727,0.000017364346,0.0134460395,0.00011353655,0.00004645155,0.96564823,0.014881879,0.00040223662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011568621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001309181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9371049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006543624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027994963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95766467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400936965","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4899343","title":"TWO USES OF PURPOSE IN STATUTORY INTERPRETATION","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Statutory law; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Computer science; Law; Economics; Programming language","score_opus":0.01599023271362804,"score_gpt":0.3236556526449377,"score_spread":0.30766541993130964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400936965","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.760059,0.11473318,0.0018284706,0.004434317,0.004312325,0.00062665815,0.00003499203,0.000090107606,0.113880955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98023623,0.018699445,0.00002913062,0.000033610086,0.00050999894,0.000012167665,0.000002662581,0.000008482575,0.0004682989],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778396,0.00021647883,0.00037184564,0.00019095739,0.00042336847,0.0010134036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994696,0.0000781737,0.00019512884,0.000070242386,0.00014385213,0.00004305293],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002172193,0.00013274376,0.00026178276,0.00022871912,0.00018468627,0.00006386837,0.00028689456,0.00011371164,0.000022545111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019518462,0.00012353847,0.00015705006,0.00020491176,0.00035725365,0.000079252255,0.00023731145,0.002730668,0.000019332365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037455764,0.000037536407,0.001205474,0.000017137487,0.00014518521,0.000006374129,0.005210385,0.00016873989,0.000016479367,0.967389,0.000045905093,0.025720367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012121511,0.000040625735,0.00035626313,0.00028146215,0.00004802969,0.000005922814,0.010918716,0.000018718469,0.000008084922,0.9860789,0.0020002099,0.00012185306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015073084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13464572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2201772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018036244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0121103125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401074789","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v15i2.16977","title":"Court, Judges and the Pandemic: Computational Legal Insights from the Ontario Court of Appeal Corpus 2008-2021","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Court of record; Political science; Law of the case; Scrutiny; High Court; Aside; Majority opinion; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.038990600245859555,"score_gpt":0.3059061628279254,"score_spread":0.26691556258206584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401074789","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8187882,0.13615072,0.00023027,0.037708014,0.0017495465,0.00019713087,0.000028427708,0.000015238568,0.005132461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932103,0.0048333467,0.00004893203,0.0003817646,0.0011136176,0.0000037034706,0.0000011934067,0.0000048852744,0.0004022278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982699,0.00023494457,0.0004722552,0.00013585934,0.0007189789,0.00016805364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99772596,0.0015116165,0.00024633313,0.000057519104,0.00040458507,0.00005397436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074627926,0.00014163162,0.00042021033,0.000038953167,0.00090781506,0.00017872777,0.00025613414,0.000042972035,0.000022320753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001645794,0.00007013449,0.00015461062,0.00014183523,0.0026751277,0.00031051063,0.00013515884,0.00035550268,0.000006494719],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006984512,0.00013213237,0.36279097,0.000030299296,0.004894198,0.00026645043,0.17126368,0.0005072382,0.000024354444,0.4317881,0.019410733,0.008193386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015564497,0.00016612149,0.14646976,0.00054002076,0.00053771696,0.00010322693,0.040167224,0.000033403805,0.0000062877666,0.07396947,0.7362106,0.00023976254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054187268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27812347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7167998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018620907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056367565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.985662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401106304","doi":"10.1080/02722011.2024.2349426","title":"Debating the Voting Age: How Canadian Legislators Grapple with the Federal Voting Age","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Review of Canadian Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Political science; Public administration; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04137940889533879,"score_gpt":0.31283403698871215,"score_spread":0.27145462809337334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401106304","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022770347,0.44398752,0.000011539337,0.47272924,0.00039329234,0.0010211413,0.000045191053,0.000062188265,0.058979534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95771515,0.0324983,0.00003227495,0.008917345,0.00037363812,0.00007655762,0.0000016490628,0.000012927197,0.0003721233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814,0.00035371396,0.00021907326,0.00021748857,0.00043145998,0.000638295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998601,0.0006837365,0.0001841814,0.00017049322,0.00017791556,0.00018265439],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015654687,0.00019356253,0.00044932464,0.00012164046,0.004691329,0.00017898035,0.0005223489,0.000015122459,0.000010505774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065235124,0.00008704377,0.00014175184,0.0020802713,0.004367333,0.00008745103,0.00006220887,0.00026714045,0.000008670111],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050493836,0.00000615885,0.007083845,0.0006307705,0.0017365583,0.00025229444,0.053829145,0.000014986591,0.000004410426,0.56356835,0.20632683,0.16654162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002692996,0.000032698892,0.003777568,0.0022854279,0.00018269761,0.0000069655634,0.061323777,0.0000051689703,9.015963e-7,0.00063390296,0.9315205,0.0002034535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96882194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99825776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9349448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003021708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015318282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401468721","doi":"10.1515/9782763743516-012","title":"De la densification normative de l’ordre constitutionnel canadien","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.028854574645492917,"score_gpt":0.2703619666250851,"score_spread":0.2415073919795922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401468721","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033783035,0.0010381422,0.0024928767,0.0032393683,0.0006753058,0.00032225886,0.000091389295,0.000055129312,0.98870724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8850907,0.001632387,0.00041257296,0.0009993874,0.0005361832,0.000013159578,0.000021185408,0.000010856992,0.11128353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840176,0.00017877272,0.000305125,0.00030239386,0.0003413445,0.00047059584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986175,0.0005256472,0.00019620304,0.00013812855,0.00030347914,0.0002190508],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006526471,0.0002750945,0.0003283797,0.00007719068,0.0013226265,0.00007461109,0.00024906924,0.00046702367,0.0016199243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021207282,0.00027404373,0.00015775421,0.000091320566,0.0055680396,0.00017958722,0.00006952717,0.00035564194,0.001440478],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007742458,0.000018377368,0.003062597,0.000014544089,0.00013886206,0.000019929264,0.0027959123,0.00007423946,0.000012296054,0.98984236,0.0010564738,0.0029566442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017594385,0.000027173593,0.0039687622,0.00020395343,0.00015819832,0.000042128748,0.003749024,0.00007704518,0.000012621825,0.23158236,0.7595661,0.00043669707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15028216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.081162035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88171244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015090186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032690535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401469005","doi":"10.1515/9782763743516-004","title":"La légitimité fédérative du processus de nomination des juges à la Cour suprême du Canada","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nomination; Philosophy; Humanities; Art; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01730363087036921,"score_gpt":0.2369622956659014,"score_spread":0.2196586647955322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401469005","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013634767,0.0012138693,0.00017070687,0.005527292,0.00051119,0.00036061608,0.0001181373,0.000039808656,0.9784236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8354596,0.0023534577,0.00010506652,0.0003839237,0.00071829517,0.000022653889,0.000015057234,0.000016258113,0.16092569],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981571,0.00020011331,0.0002913219,0.0003631928,0.0005929118,0.00039535988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977362,0.0012503542,0.00019892346,0.00008017571,0.0005889534,0.0001453523],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065289816,0.00034276908,0.00040427333,0.000048599275,0.0011777038,0.00008965446,0.0002730836,0.00034094014,0.0009722755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036352588,0.00031261425,0.000110529574,0.00009339921,0.0028507907,0.0002279805,0.00010228501,0.00027785168,0.00013886712],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020155227,0.000032752636,0.0053877635,0.00004479074,0.00015147374,0.000062047206,0.002496519,0.000028161625,0.0000029227958,0.9815277,0.0020013782,0.008244332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022466054,0.000049435836,0.0075012366,0.00021038926,0.00013741222,0.000027640945,0.00466668,0.00004162075,0.000023922143,0.06363727,0.922984,0.00049569434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8459475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97274697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92098266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092970347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057537067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401471519","doi":"10.1515/9782763736976-017","title":"Les paradigmes de la modification constitutionnelle au Canada","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.060956902156983385,"score_gpt":0.2833103218405627,"score_spread":0.22235341968357933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401471519","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000544857,0.0018635025,0.0019363606,0.012625773,0.00069321296,0.00019338653,0.000094460534,0.000052804688,0.98199564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9678298,0.0014692445,0.00019092123,0.00069365243,0.0011194828,0.000014275547,0.000022435886,0.000009141927,0.028651034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984913,0.00011532059,0.00029689484,0.00033505663,0.00045215493,0.0003092977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895996,0.00046135948,0.00014278243,0.00009481412,0.00011306228,0.00022801552],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022464515,0.0002617595,0.0003116404,0.00002481373,0.0020237195,0.00004013411,0.00023432852,0.000273796,0.001502263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016166983,0.0002582036,0.00011804728,0.000076764554,0.004923506,0.00007681381,0.000061845094,0.0002769713,0.00016906022],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067864494,0.000013015498,0.0013433546,0.000013196585,0.00011326489,0.000025438834,0.00049843226,0.00013600668,0.000004436009,0.9900889,0.0025439817,0.005213192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009145682,0.000011679081,0.0015979488,0.00007173312,0.00009181351,0.000005542817,0.0010238704,0.00006306119,0.000009839309,0.13407744,0.86265695,0.00029866575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9877841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96827227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.967285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015189222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008032053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401535383","doi":"10.7202/1107463ar","title":"LES TRACES DU DÉBAT SUR LA LÉGITIMITÉ DE LA JUSTICE CONSTITUTIONNELLE DANS LA JURISPRUDENCE DE LA COUR SUPRÊME DU CANADA","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Jurisprudence; Economic Justice; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.006243901085389233,"score_gpt":0.20987659324717672,"score_spread":0.2036326921617875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401535383","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49856892,0.005946658,0.0018854182,0.0048279837,0.0002548267,0.00015767106,0.00011868133,0.000076945864,0.4881629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96821463,0.0106456345,0.000595933,0.00031768772,0.00095398276,0.000007202773,0.000005859877,0.00001892727,0.019240128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99723774,0.00089104555,0.00026896453,0.00040427025,0.00038851576,0.0008094817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965343,0.002575111,0.00014624915,0.00016042558,0.00016275115,0.0004211649],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011969141,0.00030405915,0.00036604892,0.00007109926,0.0021547228,0.00012931915,0.00057887344,0.0004643086,0.00032125475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051630865,0.00039463307,0.00018128852,0.0003853454,0.0035248913,0.0003517493,0.0001600128,0.0005067875,0.000032459735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060070673,0.00020471922,0.045480233,0.00013662766,0.00015869574,0.0023315675,0.0101456195,0.010220246,0.00026472923,0.9183893,0.00991471,0.002693479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000726355,0.00002972224,0.03128338,0.00041035027,0.00060782797,0.0011543302,0.01060273,0.0014466378,0.00024132924,0.0046603815,0.948314,0.00052297296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6866822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8070245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93839926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069908747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044997754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401600851","doi":"10.2307/jj.18252875","title":"Constitutional Politics in Canada and the United States","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"State University of New York Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Political economy; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.036448257019110614,"score_gpt":0.21931592273034367,"score_spread":0.18286766571123306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401600851","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013067327,0.0012368246,0.000042634867,0.00036996385,0.0001791165,0.00026496293,0.00035082866,0.000011719098,0.9962372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07297013,0.001842763,0.00004583503,0.0002750711,0.00018995746,3.841241e-7,0.00007813703,0.000005380168,0.9245923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907404,0.000102292965,0.0001222083,0.000120200064,0.0003332239,0.00024804313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928427,0.00029396557,0.00012932975,0.000071948205,0.00009673741,0.00012375525],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001588777,0.000116100586,0.00024166853,0.000042746724,0.00050147326,0.000011120491,0.00021724922,0.00006498683,0.00002612398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020321304,0.00010689495,0.000038855676,0.000023506396,0.005204392,0.000029552404,0.00011799321,0.0001889299,9.926068e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053165917,0.0000032516,0.00020698234,0.000010612169,0.00007669642,0.000011692486,0.0103145605,0.00004132174,2.4169633e-8,0.96792537,0.020817038,0.00053929916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058119046,0.0000036686129,0.0001650161,0.00007315202,0.000055157856,5.6226804e-7,0.0033485896,0.000003843384,3.5194603e-7,0.045772057,0.94987804,0.00011835733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99833256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99161214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.929061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005311176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065589696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401704131","doi":"10.1007/s40803-024-00240-5","title":"A Democracy-Friendly Theory of the Rule of Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hague Journal on the Rule of Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Melbourne","keywords":"Rule of law; Constitutionalism; Democracy; Law; Opposition (politics); Law and economics; Political science; Public law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.028280640437016596,"score_gpt":0.2907778570282945,"score_spread":0.2624972165912779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401704131","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16127427,0.0040443097,0.00006947501,0.02782472,0.0016328427,0.00016950857,0.0000407983,0.000018017598,0.80492604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99820626,0.0002091506,0.000034643886,0.00047408076,0.00028499012,0.0000018234049,1.2276702e-7,0.000004957172,0.0007839438],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986215,0.00026223453,0.00030388206,0.00007932539,0.00057121547,0.0001618149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892884,0.0005635042,0.00019828572,0.0001239926,0.00014369856,0.000041672713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014054498,0.00007910721,0.00019196678,0.000025627065,0.00080108835,0.000032913194,0.00041571562,0.0000471307,0.00022019444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017666795,0.000039689967,0.0002458039,0.0001873026,0.0019171019,0.00010734958,0.00007492624,0.0002381801,0.00002111971],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029027311,0.00004799909,0.00006384386,0.00001040137,0.00009265958,0.0000043154814,0.0034006925,0.000011618767,0.00043630434,0.99458414,0.000666727,0.00065225974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000096189775,0.00006057646,0.00077943195,0.00035727833,0.00006907368,0.000009755743,0.0015953901,0.0000033366273,0.0032493325,0.85632575,0.13738954,0.00006432687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001330012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002778011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.836932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040390514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020898166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7063642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401945450","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-61879-6_11","title":"Waluchow’s Theory of Constitutional Interpretation from a Rhetorical-Argumentative Point of View","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Law and philosophy library","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Rhetorical question; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Point (geometry); Philosophy; Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03438864467991597,"score_gpt":0.26853622549405826,"score_spread":0.23414758081414228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401945450","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000044212982,0.019929817,0.00006375101,0.0018147732,0.00040646672,0.00019414943,0.00094337296,0.00003558348,0.97656786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808404,0.0044549583,0.0001716321,0.0010289848,0.00084680435,0.000012831701,0.00016130404,0.000014892292,0.012468189],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990056,0.000052248684,0.00032643977,0.0002318563,0.00029400422,0.00008983517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992915,0.00035252905,0.00016914209,0.00007462723,0.000048920414,0.000063302294],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009992231,0.00016714846,0.0003738915,0.000057226673,0.00017226953,0.000023720952,0.000120769124,0.00015252511,0.00092159514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012345171,0.0001438508,0.00015596609,0.000045407203,0.003993753,0.00029554893,0.000117035685,0.00016697697,0.000029559742],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008122981,0.000017749135,0.000024407804,0.000058378326,0.00028009684,0.000006355397,0.0016646807,1.9181842e-7,0.0000040132018,0.99685776,0.00021910969,0.0007860467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008508605,0.000041581214,0.000014877084,0.0007797279,0.0001170765,4.3070435e-7,0.00007724866,5.1088205e-7,0.000027527578,0.89317745,0.1055537,0.00012478152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043423453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002449497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9807962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019388797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402095628","doi":"10.1177/00914509241269439","title":"Discursively Embedded Institutionalized Stigma in Canadian Judicial Decisions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Drug Problems","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Stigma (botany); Political science; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.0572055905233228,"score_gpt":0.31822283333423906,"score_spread":0.26101724281091626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402095628","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04146664,0.022788186,0.00017009015,0.028990356,0.0028869205,0.0010925238,0.00018304613,0.00027062726,0.9021516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963043,0.00037994736,0.000045706136,0.00040815747,0.00042716332,0.00010946876,0.000040547046,0.000010517288,0.0022742292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980978,0.00016039425,0.0003735984,0.0003802147,0.0004527817,0.00053521607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991152,0.00025220943,0.00003914711,0.00010990107,0.00010893075,0.00037459304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009057062,0.00016617596,0.00024678945,0.00035857092,0.001110753,0.00017577718,0.00029778117,0.00010004006,0.00019252449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048459443,0.0001520826,0.000111091365,0.00093083945,0.0008601484,0.0005469035,0.00005801462,0.0002501116,0.0002903625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001310844,0.000040034283,0.0070852917,0.000008933794,0.000040616822,0.00016015096,0.0108131375,0.000051691546,0.000013566346,0.9506,0.028235935,0.0029374778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028092504,0.000009364755,0.003911739,0.00043048002,0.000009446914,0.000001749939,0.0022017262,0.000059312748,0.000004116862,0.1255551,0.8672966,0.00023944768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81735736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9229888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9548376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049678097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007583955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402389994","doi":"10.4337/9781035309320.00031","title":"Preserving institutional legitimacy through openness: the Supreme Court of Canada and Chief Justice Wagner","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Legitimacy; Openness to experience; Political science; Law; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03518090092892873,"score_gpt":0.2617089170299404,"score_spread":0.2265280161010117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402389994","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014668111,0.0032970284,0.000029404004,0.008648118,0.0024787695,0.00040531153,0.00020137918,0.00006627131,0.984727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13812906,0.00047086272,0.00022685874,0.0017978764,0.004732823,0.000062454914,0.00005433601,0.00005964711,0.8544661],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974437,0.00004779992,0.00041143713,0.00043222832,0.0012536361,0.00041122045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860626,0.00040292522,0.00020316614,0.0002409636,0.00042481994,0.00012187463],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008681636,0.00029635147,0.00038640632,0.00006277747,0.0019452267,0.00094268395,0.0008088024,0.00024434837,0.000205801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006081479,0.00022610703,0.00011498454,0.000053143285,0.0016941912,0.00077716226,0.00067177706,0.00074535946,0.000007793883],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009270565,0.0000043088567,0.000014553545,0.00008166129,0.00016640924,0.000025255144,0.0024393443,0.000009394944,9.977963e-7,0.9158221,0.0807388,0.0006879136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081331804,0.000008659246,0.000062282306,0.00035351323,0.00017567829,0.0000058181085,0.0008226508,0.000004086713,0.000002599132,0.23295583,0.7653098,0.00021774444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7199861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9065531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.684571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003203335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043864823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402459891","doi":"10.5771/9783748939030","title":"Theorising Comparative Public Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; Yale University","keywords":"Political science; Comparative law; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.08529132256516513,"score_gpt":0.3474732561841544,"score_spread":0.2621819336189893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402459891","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000106503896,0.00472612,0.000057179685,0.0010480778,0.0020877803,0.00089594605,0.00021908504,0.00052341196,0.9903359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22809842,0.0002544764,0.00004547366,0.0008964285,0.0034537462,0.00008995792,0.00007660598,0.000068976035,0.76701593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99550134,0.00033153725,0.0006496186,0.0009828462,0.0014915887,0.0010430965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977495,0.0005757188,0.0002903497,0.0004604077,0.0005199874,0.0004040531],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010202981,0.00073158735,0.0010546606,0.0002497463,0.0025200865,0.00064693415,0.0009285288,0.0007523717,0.0008125545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007397307,0.0006984757,0.0005277565,0.00016328575,0.003273221,0.00022491926,0.000329055,0.0013186507,0.0057400526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020656571,0.000032306983,0.000008256104,0.00004025261,0.00036591885,0.00007520249,0.00888056,5.3317956e-7,0.000009252699,0.90654266,0.082902916,0.0011214714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014899702,0.00004967799,0.0000033800156,0.00026535834,0.00012886187,0.0000041800326,0.0014453399,0.0000024874075,0.0000239083,0.3041365,0.6932382,0.0005530752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002720302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0084338095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6103353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009259001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030925472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402516137","doi":"10.1111/capa.12575","title":"Modernizing Canada's Electoral System: What Drove the Creation of the National Register of Electors?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Register (sociolinguistics); Political science; Business; Public administration","score_opus":0.035578998413995505,"score_gpt":0.2814305521508475,"score_spread":0.245851553736852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402516137","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31376046,0.0047288793,0.00037000628,0.44996783,0.0046694786,0.001329073,0.00035185966,0.00008688066,0.22473553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990465,0.000014416389,0.0000033970643,0.00021781029,0.00026430067,0.00001400895,0.00001354718,0.0000033579418,0.0004226743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891955,0.0000938134,0.00019252015,0.00010891692,0.00051535084,0.00016988172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931234,0.00009866097,0.000083718616,0.0000653873,0.00035741949,0.000082495564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003737089,0.000059229744,0.00007648254,0.000053888733,0.0006226753,0.00018447438,0.00018126883,0.000047932426,0.00002964937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026692703,0.000041041003,0.000045183893,0.0004162388,0.00032171223,0.00032813186,0.0000086544715,0.00007680892,0.0000012303174],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019207812,0.0000031334237,0.001254111,0.000016138007,0.000028232791,8.6943186e-7,0.00040622108,0.000002867675,0.000032501626,0.9929763,0.0045617013,0.0007160059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013583725,0.00005798326,0.02000907,0.00041610916,0.000091586444,0.000014180922,0.014088339,0.0015431816,0.00068675255,0.010576835,0.9520738,0.00030631706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8592248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99901664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98239946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009851868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019303171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9862565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402986217","doi":"10.4324/9781003577102-20","title":"Law, Convention, Prerogative: Reflections Prompted By The Canadian Constitutional Case","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Convention; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.05315394796405548,"score_gpt":0.3235051421602879,"score_spread":0.27035119419623244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402986217","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000030303797,0.005231357,0.00019908154,0.010178589,0.0026027125,0.00096753275,0.0036106545,0.00021227106,0.97699475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5636458,0.00020190832,0.000059167796,0.0026793608,0.0015541778,0.00019205883,0.0006489576,0.000021004536,0.4309976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99718225,0.00008508649,0.0005369117,0.00066330144,0.0009496104,0.00058281294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979768,0.0002818477,0.00017642563,0.0002498905,0.0008670709,0.00044797067],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005915977,0.00045657475,0.0003872704,0.00014021315,0.012134231,0.00040442552,0.00036598823,0.00055464613,0.0029740299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010717552,0.00038933643,0.0003401692,0.0001766461,0.065297626,0.00027611127,0.00011154574,0.00090108585,0.001879525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000081470425,0.000021321715,0.000004267281,0.000012177623,0.000400837,0.0005851176,0.00020885514,0.000008790453,0.0000020492712,0.964026,0.034671977,0.000050507366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010251555,0.000011416151,5.637743e-7,0.00013425933,0.00016591226,0.0005524168,0.00010243841,0.00000144228,0.0000023600282,0.41154456,0.58711046,0.00027164232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34946945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88631356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56364274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016613936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007885906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998559},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403765740","doi":"10.5020/2317-2150.2024.14827","title":"National Council of Justice and the one test: democratizing the Brazilian Judiciary","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicas","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Test (biology); Economic Justice; Democracy; Law; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.06094019629640765,"score_gpt":0.3128658194771532,"score_spread":0.2519256231807455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403765740","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059519485,0.11655224,0.0007818868,0.10016563,0.00078237936,0.0012870481,0.00015476723,0.00024194404,0.7205146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947727,0.0020203027,0.00009365628,0.001918357,0.0007606325,0.000027013206,0.0000016238515,0.000008402897,0.00039736409],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99781066,0.0002448886,0.0002975141,0.00021611911,0.0011676827,0.0002631517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99631256,0.0029568146,0.00009302564,0.00011595348,0.00045163615,0.00007001309],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041377414,0.00011854106,0.0002278958,0.000032760847,0.0015444685,0.00022434763,0.00027658933,0.000064819214,0.00009552253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059873275,0.00007375584,0.000100749785,0.0004738616,0.002609017,0.00012395135,0.000101626894,0.0002461395,0.000045203582],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000225905,0.00002834248,0.000592098,0.000057496418,0.00008282677,0.000010631135,0.007399037,0.0000030594936,0.00006736659,0.97837096,0.0105656795,0.002799916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005206995,0.00004399012,0.010541704,0.00050331996,0.0008872021,0.000036410675,0.005664527,0.0006439931,0.000023356151,0.2500289,0.730799,0.00030687172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002795285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017552549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93525314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035581875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027962541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404331321","doi":"10.5380/rinc.v11i3.93874","title":"Constitutional Law around the globe: judicial review in Canada and the “leave to appeal” to the Supreme Court","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Investigações Constitucionais","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Globe; Political science; Medicine; Ophthalmology","score_opus":0.02623933458475329,"score_gpt":0.2795685213300442,"score_spread":0.25332918674529087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404331321","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009842004,0.17020568,0.00060484034,0.7224208,0.0014384715,0.0032428117,0.00025218743,0.00009831604,0.09189487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9398364,0.0077623953,0.00006115692,0.051070653,0.0009570453,0.00023748126,0.0000056586623,0.0000060428115,0.000063195934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99732995,0.00054690544,0.0004655637,0.00038395674,0.0007775575,0.00049609505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979311,0.0013284766,0.00006201129,0.00025882848,0.00015083606,0.0002687043],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026050718,0.00022481549,0.0003769643,0.000034359233,0.0018881375,0.00033288563,0.00059033604,0.000051372324,0.00006563922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018572853,0.00012165452,0.00009724258,0.0009081017,0.007157926,0.00012588462,0.00022625229,0.00036520275,0.00009797849],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014420093,0.000004912437,0.0014281677,0.000054216267,0.000048885428,0.000029621404,0.0010611914,0.00005449254,0.0000020245961,0.940843,0.055051487,0.00140761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014089856,0.000006620747,0.00080668594,0.0017618188,0.000079185054,0.000038162067,0.0010772872,0.000023640505,0.0000017320536,0.017607817,0.9782653,0.0001908944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8480248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9651304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92999434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007436591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063881003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404377710","doi":"10.1163/09763457-bja10078","title":"Extending Voting Rights to Emigrants","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diaspora Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Emigration; Political science; Computer security; Computer science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.06439875418850274,"score_gpt":0.37906291760212846,"score_spread":0.3146641634136257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404377710","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76266664,0.09771994,0.0003063825,0.016656179,0.005468573,0.0004829695,0.00002681402,0.0008533812,0.11581914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99718523,0.0006763198,0.00012577303,0.00025760903,0.0009288496,0.000031148436,7.665157e-7,0.0000048681154,0.0007894156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894434,0.000037388,0.00014959967,0.00024137573,0.00031266353,0.00031464573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995168,0.00023674044,0.0000179964,0.000047793645,0.000102537044,0.00007814862],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042083283,0.00010621054,0.00018200043,0.000089786714,0.0014592252,0.00007070636,0.00011270113,0.000029223114,0.000035758636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029611227,0.000083690116,0.00007030645,0.00049490866,0.00034049264,0.00014306924,0.00009353854,0.000074596115,0.0003988685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052093724,0.000015939064,0.0034539406,0.000015938711,0.00021288518,0.00009023791,0.09098029,0.0000066357597,0.000023085355,0.86984384,0.023868922,0.01148305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104515544,0.000043127136,0.0149022145,0.00073089584,0.00009345748,0.0000019441277,0.12892936,0.000010844726,0.000087600005,0.088142335,0.7664386,0.00051509595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007675216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008293641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7817015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010777412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056774283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404536783","doi":"10.5040/9781509975105.ch-012","title":"Resolving Dicey’s Contradictions? Rights, Freedoms, and Parliamentary Sovereignty in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Parliamentary sovereignty; Political science; Law; Political economy; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.013344478329277633,"score_gpt":0.2420572352595917,"score_spread":0.22871275693031407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404536783","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000042177475,0.017170371,0.000004349846,0.0015423475,0.0008981679,0.00018310835,0.0001020715,0.000067742214,0.97998965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3411112,0.0056603407,0.00012319768,0.0012253656,0.0017895964,0.00005424953,0.000018175902,0.0000919205,0.64992595],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990736,0.000044678618,0.0001366108,0.00023251551,0.00028831052,0.00022428058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997595,0.000056980785,0.00003701884,0.000059068552,0.000010136074,0.000077288554],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011014483,0.0001248068,0.00020298015,0.00007792609,0.00021755202,0.000038463546,0.00008857709,0.000088032444,0.0036840083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017398783,0.00010421067,0.000024303696,0.00013264753,0.0003998672,0.000034069104,0.000044027875,0.00016318311,0.00003973969],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011983844,0.000004216484,0.0010036106,0.0000058983233,0.00004363413,0.00002686808,0.0001261167,1.02076044e-7,5.080219e-8,0.38956776,0.60891426,0.00030631383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008434928,0.0000031730913,0.0003652014,0.0002023087,0.000024876723,5.8782615e-7,0.0029630903,0.0000017617366,1.5291104e-7,0.053058777,0.94315225,0.00014347283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99983686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34106904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005280797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010701843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404586027","doi":"10.21991/cf29479","title":"Notwithstanding the Notwithstanding Clause","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Compromise; Constitution; Political science; Law; Charter; Federalism; Politics; Human rights; Democracy; Law and economics; Constitutional law; Independence (probability theory); Sociology","score_opus":0.035735627502750104,"score_gpt":0.30974509407732737,"score_spread":0.27400946657457725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404586027","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035099252,0.016229503,0.17556778,0.07668246,0.0129192425,0.0013973332,0.00044069087,0.0014054148,0.71184766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948905,0.00073811377,0.0002777609,0.0016512303,0.0011274186,0.000098963785,0.0000362303,0.00001555396,0.0011642032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961546,0.0001682154,0.0006185636,0.000687095,0.0011940409,0.0011774824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981056,0.0008124572,0.00011095116,0.00031565866,0.0003505854,0.0003047854],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011861601,0.00040940673,0.00035816475,0.00031040813,0.008822449,0.0007505055,0.0006180766,0.00024451097,0.00063617923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008641011,0.0003056311,0.00037707158,0.001275256,0.017369261,0.0011577323,0.00023701653,0.00059914147,0.00087425194],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003409647,0.000038523387,0.0050590853,0.0000145301965,0.00018283183,0.00008778896,0.0008367444,0.00018707219,0.00006885416,0.97509426,0.016757667,0.0016385585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033664744,0.000026494408,0.00019016453,0.00038614115,0.00011501963,0.00012219445,0.010283266,0.00030493198,0.00005135237,0.1501349,0.8375687,0.00048016358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013298225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024243265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9913806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008916413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038032096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404622236","doi":"10.1093/9780191996344.003.0005","title":"Canon and Comparative Constitutional Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Generality; Canon; Context (archaeology); Representativeness heuristic; Constitutional law; Population; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Law; Linguistics; Geography; Psychology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0931467001989707,"score_gpt":0.32288797650559986,"score_spread":0.22974127630662916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404622236","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000020207035,0.006796337,0.000020367734,0.0017422416,0.00048054618,0.00013780779,0.00007888057,0.000070664544,0.99067116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16774787,0.0006421881,0.000026776734,0.00045500437,0.00054474035,0.0000054155635,0.000010976238,0.0000024561393,0.83056456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927676,0.000006570709,0.0001154095,0.00020322164,0.00027688392,0.00012118131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996945,0.0000810069,0.000028758044,0.00003563004,0.00008807859,0.00007198278],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008962161,0.00012991349,0.00020182248,0.00003187034,0.0007156409,0.00006160011,0.00005904161,0.00012757894,0.0012049568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000049498904,0.00011000147,0.000054527012,0.000016630824,0.0074663972,0.00005199585,0.00006338017,0.00015480546,0.0006039388],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002449814,0.0000021691342,0.0000035031321,0.0000033967772,0.00007834647,0.000010963898,0.00040517966,2.6134526e-7,3.310899e-7,0.9928412,0.0065055294,0.00014669164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018332552,0.0000045921324,0.0000015035101,0.000040203733,0.000024891055,0.0000012067533,0.00012858292,2.0529404e-7,4.2625243e-7,0.4561097,0.5435896,0.00008077656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051145493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038226817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53708404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008651166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003819513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404622306","doi":"10.1093/9780191996344.003.0017","title":"Rights as the Domain of Weak-Form Review","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Judicial review; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Subject (documents); Sociology","score_opus":0.02865305825386754,"score_gpt":0.29976914463322374,"score_spread":0.2711160863793562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404622306","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[8.317838e-7,0.08638394,0.0000018083052,0.012492946,0.0003716047,0.00027030072,0.0000121115345,0.000031214357,0.90043527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00072920986,0.0639447,0.000011502955,0.0009952417,0.00047217464,0.000009026259,0.0000026906453,0.000004859665,0.9338306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990527,0.000011795747,0.00021672771,0.00014141462,0.000460695,0.000116648414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959517,0.00008778883,0.000079460064,0.00010820918,0.000095440264,0.00003395889],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037280988,0.00011871438,0.00026071392,0.000021947508,0.0004606484,0.000015398877,0.00023017573,0.00009552354,0.003992175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021214795,0.000060908966,0.00019888305,0.000044980636,0.0010585533,0.00002819334,0.000082688326,0.00014697222,0.0015472925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.1187045e-7,0.0000018948869,3.0483696e-7,0.000054510263,0.00006681712,0.000003065253,0.0002743755,4.047336e-9,7.089051e-8,0.9645149,0.03413024,0.0009529739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063233797,0.000004753118,5.451816e-7,0.00080333394,0.000048612343,4.9274126e-7,0.000057549736,4.511439e-9,2.2853453e-7,0.49214965,0.50688237,0.000046118977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006449698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010961227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47275215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004937088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020707789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99923015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404696545","doi":"10.7202/1114752ar","title":"One Rule to Rule Them All: Subordinate Legislation and the Law of Judicial Review","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Statute; Supreme court; Lawmaking; Political science; Law; Judicial review; Context (archaeology); Ultra vires; Rule of law; Legislature; Law and economics; Common law; Economics; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.06088305575232307,"score_gpt":0.33318139531767976,"score_spread":0.2722983395653567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404696545","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040806222,0.30167276,0.000007015279,0.10031287,0.00017277224,0.001125475,0.000016503529,0.00006745761,0.5962171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19589548,0.77954024,0.000062375264,0.023796879,0.0002422195,0.000113173104,0.000010210223,0.000008558861,0.0003308559],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985935,0.00028976332,0.00034193057,0.00017027599,0.00039354162,0.00021097511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933493,0.00019246398,0.00013211806,0.00014188261,0.00013503163,0.00006358433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023184523,0.00009484634,0.00046612218,0.000011136576,0.000554608,0.000020041856,0.00019512298,0.000030911036,0.00013821271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035413518,0.00006623415,0.00011386109,0.0005510057,0.0008983342,0.00010105363,0.000096336546,0.00007097434,0.00031250404],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029291828,0.00000984733,0.00005137414,0.0004967117,0.000028246895,6.9490034e-7,0.00018943584,9.574829e-8,0.0000033417778,0.98001796,0.008655997,0.010543342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011973947,0.00000824861,0.00042894532,0.005014975,0.00014067885,4.638511e-7,0.000031540476,2.3641694e-7,0.0000047194962,0.05215983,0.942003,0.00008759332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015088715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006452786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93334705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023154633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055112432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9914699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404989003","doi":"10.1017/9781316831946.019","title":"Cambridge Studies in Law and Society","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.06124413271378588,"score_gpt":0.36212349196168286,"score_spread":0.300879359247897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404989003","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000056432855,0.048253596,0.0000013925379,0.0010301806,0.0004900292,0.00009382993,0.000010090966,0.000102781385,0.95001245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0070010494,0.018729066,0.00005652384,0.00087668607,0.00064030616,0.000014757622,6.6997677e-7,0.00003118595,0.97264975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949205,0.000018396313,0.000065107204,0.00015949887,0.00013636892,0.00012859024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998918,0.000027232803,0.00001578054,0.000030498497,0.000012468636,0.000022178861],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014433671,0.0000822442,0.00016476933,0.000023864179,0.000114829374,0.000020511497,0.000044329197,0.000092718015,0.00013549971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017534483,0.000063878506,0.00004225146,0.00010261377,0.0020109806,0.000016654745,0.00007340037,0.0000810215,0.00017890123],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.1911838e-7,0.0000023188043,0.000020110954,0.000014607034,0.000045760582,0.000002962251,0.001321287,2.708114e-9,5.5948476e-8,0.51911724,0.4794184,0.00005714771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030648785,0.0000025851232,0.000016673755,0.00015370529,0.0000151619115,1.7431478e-7,0.01085043,8.049618e-8,1.2221705e-7,0.014836797,0.97400826,0.00008534918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06764573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12548119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50428045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004762694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049151018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9385629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405131174","doi":"","title":"Cooperative constitutionalism: From law, to technology, to language or how to escape the promise of global emancipation","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"book-chapter","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.019848488263362954,"score_gpt":0.2751908675902895,"score_spread":0.25534237932692655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405131174","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02516091,0.0009146241,0.016997045,0.47567606,0.0004120416,0.002637503,0.0021181302,0.00021117035,0.47587252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98391926,0.00019919136,0.005638872,0.0018731342,0.00011940019,0.00015836692,0.00012940326,0.000018291299,0.00794405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99661714,0.0010450184,0.0004839028,0.000744443,0.0007793809,0.00033013933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947707,0.0009178676,0.00033749765,0.0007511253,0.002907868,0.00031493368],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015273885,0.00036693498,0.00054297317,0.00009438713,0.0013279353,0.00025809728,0.0012453392,0.00026965773,0.000252982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003606671,0.00029346382,0.00015518974,0.0009186892,0.0018734577,0.00013202973,0.0009196475,0.00028228125,0.00030278586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007800015,0.00010114528,0.00028470138,0.000011990976,0.0001325241,0.000006749749,0.014062201,0.000015787486,0.00080877787,0.97623396,0.001414934,0.006849254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001161819,0.000020279633,0.0030990767,0.004921523,0.00036631452,0.000007560372,0.012970507,0.00010438066,0.014211302,0.04724485,0.9144264,0.0014660098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013985387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0856226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95875835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026711702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007160891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405177591","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5039013","title":"Power Over Parliament: The Status and Future of the Justiciability of the Legislative Process","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Parliament; Legislature; Legislative process; Power (physics); Process (computing); Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Politics; Law; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.009429911360568383,"score_gpt":0.28894079497019565,"score_spread":0.2795108836096273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405177591","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8352346,0.06700255,0.000025849402,0.02733301,0.003131785,0.00085366593,0.00007262007,0.000013242364,0.0663327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98816895,0.010789245,0.0000010282164,0.00007090118,0.0006710764,0.000009431007,1.9099497e-7,0.00000536328,0.00028380327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976601,0.00031518986,0.00028122775,0.00017681981,0.00067899295,0.0008876743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990745,0.00011654325,0.00036634295,0.00016882562,0.00023924717,0.00003455193],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016159923,0.00014251733,0.0002199189,0.000020055768,0.0009334756,0.000048403395,0.0005318194,0.00011927753,0.000027878003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020984244,0.000060916325,0.00021402072,0.0002469699,0.001789319,0.00004046538,0.00049788156,0.0025710016,5.652594e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024541523,0.000036298712,0.011389013,0.000031038417,0.00035158603,1.3727775e-7,0.025269626,0.00003454804,0.0000045305483,0.96006155,0.000076249635,0.0027208573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007631498,0.000025661026,0.019414937,0.00011662981,0.00016384317,0.0000024162891,0.03153773,0.0000023648554,0.000010539923,0.9386148,0.009957807,0.000076955796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033550628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017064493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15293437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005699329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00912207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997301},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405224118","doi":"10.22201/iij.24487937e.2025.19.18773","title":"Waluchow’s constitutional morality and the artificial reason of the Common Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Problema Anuario de Filosofía y Teoría del Derecho","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Rationality; Law; Philosophy of law; Scope (computer science); Constitutional law; Philosophy; Rule of law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Public law; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.033711042017283824,"score_gpt":0.296853218188618,"score_spread":0.2631421761713342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405224118","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1840689,0.016849693,0.0022506074,0.1982333,0.002284839,0.0027615572,0.0003561651,0.00044979254,0.5927451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99818784,0.00023683187,0.00020928113,0.00075562927,0.0002715606,0.00007047626,0.000004474538,0.000005649672,0.0002582847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810684,0.0004341544,0.00035208138,0.00026755343,0.0005152358,0.00032412255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989177,0.0005813381,0.00009340085,0.00018373302,0.00014533219,0.00007847628],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001615468,0.00015388666,0.00025793412,0.000034003962,0.0016259195,0.00018753088,0.00032953304,0.00013150068,0.00006511305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000293129,0.00009119531,0.00016327041,0.00039374776,0.008573042,0.00018416623,0.00016399019,0.00034376493,0.000021536442],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051909326,0.000038397797,0.0045980206,0.000028144235,0.00006866833,0.0000036892395,0.0017804283,0.000017803388,0.000060573828,0.98945695,0.0013926645,0.002502729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022861059,0.000015290567,0.002989855,0.00015539106,0.00009753127,0.000013438095,0.00038672786,0.00023136978,0.00021571503,0.94116193,0.054362394,0.00014177391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030104818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012066277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8141189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013638772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062994537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405357716","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4991203","title":"Judicial Dialogues in Mixed Jurisdiction Courts: How Civilian and Common Law Judges Converse on Canada’s Supreme Court","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Converse; Supreme court; Jurisdiction; Political science; Original jurisdiction; Common law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.014054710131509674,"score_gpt":0.24717518882766865,"score_spread":0.23312047869615898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405357716","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90595955,0.0108536035,0.00004775832,0.053408366,0.0022345071,0.0002444374,0.000026541864,0.00007967497,0.027145592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99070704,0.0078000864,0.0000017809945,0.000391959,0.00087786955,0.0000058518294,0.000004917331,0.0000089866335,0.00020152936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774784,0.00016538911,0.00018516966,0.00020804588,0.0005021467,0.0011913837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995736,0.00015311057,0.00005382564,0.00005219552,0.000060646988,0.00010665895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013770155,0.00014213874,0.0002110498,0.0000945651,0.0009432798,0.00013635767,0.00013518023,0.00009131166,0.000017999424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006364349,0.00012945815,0.000054486747,0.00017057158,0.00040139208,0.00022059106,0.000026432512,0.0011024337,0.000007416188],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004073207,0.00002700024,0.0051592058,0.0000040979044,0.000090274094,0.000042642972,0.0013034476,0.000004851484,0.000019052663,0.9866055,0.002318761,0.0043844124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056607724,0.0002699448,0.009704732,0.00015740874,0.00007794106,0.000063230036,0.02426131,0.000038279653,0.000028185746,0.78582644,0.1786635,0.00034292985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6953056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30272838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024664525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063058417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405493505","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5052704","title":"The Statutory Interpretation Jurisprudence of Sir Lyman Duff","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Jurisprudence; Interpretation (philosophy); Statutory law; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.011100591902900966,"score_gpt":0.3051533473796229,"score_spread":0.29405275547672194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405493505","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28741264,0.40385014,0.007448681,0.033108942,0.0145963635,0.0011640579,0.00005525373,0.00023896882,0.25212494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9449208,0.052278247,0.000011216098,0.00003716263,0.0008491112,0.00001312228,0.000001485367,0.000008832805,0.0018800488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973453,0.00023424356,0.00037333422,0.0001997269,0.0006543872,0.0011929609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906886,0.00020946056,0.00028938722,0.00011989647,0.00025783337,0.000054583998],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031824377,0.00014851968,0.00020723719,0.00007639816,0.0011051944,0.00016104105,0.00058753684,0.00013515804,0.000011121394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003017929,0.0001053703,0.00022757277,0.00015959423,0.00082167453,0.00006811813,0.00035202815,0.0028565703,0.000031425723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030226665,0.000014909087,0.00012769374,0.00001068242,0.0002769461,0.0000021237076,0.0033970526,0.00004736971,0.000010625356,0.9630292,0.0002869877,0.0327662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047810805,0.000049408252,0.0001803045,0.00016411515,0.000081289734,0.0000069403713,0.010491481,0.000023456052,0.0000073571637,0.97116786,0.017664261,0.00011570226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035442947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032306027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65750813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001417051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013317852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406268164","doi":"10.4337/ccs.2024.0032","title":"Holistic interpretation and the interdependence of constitutional structures and rights: an essay in honor of Cheryl Saunders","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Constitutional Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Law and economics; Political science; Interdependence; Human rights; Context (archaeology); Law; Democracy; Normative; Separation of powers; Constitutional law; Constitution; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.10734654030703557,"score_gpt":0.40691126374667075,"score_spread":0.2995647234396352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406268164","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7073499,0.16112986,0.022359017,0.0054795826,0.0020976057,0.0015559627,0.00031835365,0.00009764352,0.09961209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99894464,0.000747137,0.00013079654,0.000052436622,0.00006992483,0.000031977648,0.0000045110755,0.0000010244665,0.000017527535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873567,0.0002379838,0.00035251968,0.00023896227,0.00029967463,0.00013518234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982454,0.0012605392,0.00009516264,0.000054498334,0.00030513853,0.00003923121],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005900337,0.00013589635,0.00039067172,0.00011042587,0.000557683,0.000040360504,0.00011486894,0.00004384514,0.00002281992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003779816,0.00008980872,0.000046626883,0.00024751015,0.04773863,0.00037071417,0.00009789093,0.00013746835,0.0000014087941],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014601302,0.000023176079,0.00204325,0.000035215733,0.00020094946,0.0000030302774,0.019956144,0.00012795586,0.00003566534,0.9769517,0.000050968458,0.00042590173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078554254,0.00005327828,0.011900892,0.0004901398,0.00009505616,0.0000117449945,0.029541386,0.0004772653,0.000077050194,0.9532742,0.0031123331,0.0001811159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012305576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044388883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29159477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010675142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004922074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9548529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406326514","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v39.9019","title":"The Democratizing Influence of Intervention","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0380645486569132,"score_gpt":0.3638239986170885,"score_spread":0.32575944996017525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406326514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87094957,0.003546133,0.0006493147,0.004813931,0.0008226389,0.00033096506,0.000009786697,0.00006181552,0.11881583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99912494,0.0001712612,0.00005495117,0.00007616683,0.00019027671,0.000010234904,2.1643555e-7,0.0000030076885,0.0003689615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992547,0.000048851558,0.00019558425,0.0000985659,0.0002767668,0.00012554604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938524,0.00030926047,0.000051909912,0.0000699049,0.00014887984,0.000034778874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004624567,0.000047097015,0.00008473097,0.000046990815,0.00031590924,0.00009223986,0.00032154695,0.000027132633,0.000026251215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053212466,0.00003511477,0.0000542904,0.00031495612,0.00035439938,0.00026421095,0.000113888666,0.00006213929,0.000029084618],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006391619,0.000053241176,0.0043788627,0.00027070925,0.00013392915,0.0000070925366,0.008235904,0.00089431735,0.0016961824,0.93997055,0.0034520368,0.040843252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005210702,0.00036219897,0.3201019,0.0048288233,0.0011016869,0.0000033533063,0.026443234,0.00034627825,0.0071490235,0.1376058,0.5007558,0.00078087515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029989711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011387755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80236477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028839993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011586528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4533567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406327004","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v39.9018","title":"The Importance of Effective Access to Justice for Charter Violations and the Role of the Court Challenges Program","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Charter; Economic Justice; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.035966301314531976,"score_gpt":0.3635254641516331,"score_spread":0.3275591628371011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406327004","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49975604,0.058345504,0.001013967,0.18732364,0.003857784,0.021331772,0.00037947984,0.000210254,0.22778156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981765,0.00059616147,0.000060220256,0.0002293116,0.00035827045,0.00048959133,3.7796423e-7,0.0000071208983,0.00008244669],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894816,0.00010278127,0.0002375364,0.00018344061,0.00033653303,0.00019155222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99773544,0.0016237118,0.00012014767,0.00016528866,0.00030802726,0.00004739268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007859748,0.000095093805,0.00019496187,0.00003703649,0.00062958995,0.00012018616,0.000649151,0.00004474084,0.000007774027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008159051,0.000050124436,0.000086723616,0.00032556994,0.0008599017,0.00021157315,0.00025924115,0.00008949639,0.0000020199263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042014933,0.00011689772,0.00450154,0.00047510726,0.0003227433,5.218997e-7,0.022912804,0.00010600053,0.00019110742,0.8895121,0.0016900536,0.07975096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013532053,0.00053378195,0.43610367,0.0015817081,0.003912638,0.0000020728035,0.04851278,0.0010108508,0.0026012692,0.12269525,0.3810931,0.000599666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059730216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024181209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76681685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024685687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014396361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48423603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406598080","doi":"10.1177/07349149241312179","title":"An Enquiry Concerning Administrative Discretion in Indigenous Consultations","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Statutory law; Agency (philosophy); Adjudication; Legislation; Indigenous; Administrative law; Political science; Structuring; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Law; Law and economics; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.04596859955352929,"score_gpt":0.3746969456790901,"score_spread":0.32872834612556084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406598080","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68183744,0.00034519832,0.0710173,0.034561906,0.0010177608,0.0015387685,0.0000979656,0.0003716279,0.20921205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99856657,0.000016357115,0.0002073532,0.0002607272,0.00012404291,0.00015915606,0.00007707517,0.0000034970944,0.0005852095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852514,0.00027712426,0.00034861985,0.00026783097,0.0002774307,0.00030385805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924487,0.00018052751,0.00011247133,0.00010922899,0.0002378834,0.00011501343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049557566,0.00011545556,0.00015170616,0.00016689855,0.0010472024,0.00027975996,0.00018313543,0.000105819694,0.00017162356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001864768,0.00012500993,0.000038457936,0.0006602299,0.0006616986,0.00076306093,0.0000042006245,0.00014100046,0.000030348883],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003187868,0.00023703065,0.008441319,0.000003962947,0.000021960455,0.000008383595,0.03190115,0.000002444739,0.000053860666,0.9252939,0.000078450066,0.03392561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023054683,0.0023473306,0.17188789,0.00016713979,0.00007835913,0.000007294802,0.46055964,0.00028090706,0.00020716508,0.1733224,0.18770635,0.0011300516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014467861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038507428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75197154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016663788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023732253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9790373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406767273","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-42437-3_10","title":"Same-Sex Marriage: The Structural Articulation of “Equal Dignity”","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Articulation (sociology); Sociology; Gender studies; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.041125432750586804,"score_gpt":0.30139278587830787,"score_spread":0.2602673531277211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406767273","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031703842,0.0008245024,0.00002920427,0.0019727037,0.0005690736,0.00017698573,0.000026096319,0.000041370135,0.996043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5009175,0.00010851591,0.000016678097,0.000112982794,0.0006992124,0.0000030793033,0.000006860958,0.0000056457793,0.49812952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991216,0.000016906737,0.00018615008,0.00013615134,0.0004229768,0.00011621425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959815,0.00013117652,0.00007228534,0.00007760196,0.00009169232,0.000029105686],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018888996,0.00010804637,0.00016138502,0.000029648525,0.00041906227,0.000041003354,0.00012608971,0.00011154097,0.0013941021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046483692,0.00006514298,0.000119695746,0.000035247045,0.00089142955,0.000046610316,0.00007403512,0.00014896125,0.00015899022],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025702661,9.4387843e-7,0.00003604666,0.0000047405747,0.00006187085,0.0000016409002,0.0010477017,0.0000026635216,0.0000026358284,0.9952922,0.00090982346,0.0026371726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022164142,0.000008347378,0.0001666132,0.000030442103,0.00006332634,3.487684e-7,0.0006084809,0.000005312015,0.000005196944,0.82097936,0.17802328,0.00008715117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035127325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054678554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50060046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054063297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013586527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99951875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407084403","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5099987","title":"When the Administrative State Encounters the Constitution","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; State (computer science); Political science; Administrative law; Public administration; Law; Computer science; Algorithm","score_opus":0.028758387111335142,"score_gpt":0.32519092524716636,"score_spread":0.2964325381358312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407084403","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015122815,0.0412608,0.019616758,0.20291501,0.0076845163,0.0018801957,0.00016423599,0.00014106784,0.7112146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96751416,0.025412424,0.0000102450285,0.00067694625,0.00091573934,0.000039735492,0.0000036592594,0.0000030063964,0.005424093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969379,0.00051215565,0.00030498893,0.00022170877,0.0005971349,0.0014261244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892515,0.00028411532,0.0002935559,0.0001644601,0.00028323915,0.00004946883],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036011094,0.00019577693,0.00020830387,0.000048029156,0.003840007,0.0002712544,0.0008984326,0.000119816126,0.00003581767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003084945,0.00010833896,0.00021807694,0.00014461347,0.0021976212,0.00009767605,0.00024636526,0.0036208348,0.000019858482],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002918152,0.00001771315,0.00025833698,0.0000021337255,0.00037852515,0.000002131712,0.0066774082,0.000077701705,6.254566e-7,0.9851715,0.0014183387,0.0059663863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009228796,0.00003052774,0.00011910394,0.000067919216,0.00009164607,0.000013449887,0.027836602,0.0000041414637,0.0000021772296,0.8465397,0.12508379,0.000118698474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012040786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.116418384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9523913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017421364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03079493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99867785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407350768","doi":"10.7202/1116144ar","title":"Lorne M. Sossin and Gerard Kennedy, Boundaries of Judicial Review : The Law of Justiciability in Canada, 3rd ed., Toronto, Thomson Reuters, 2024, 575 p., ISBN 978-1-0382-0557-5.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Law; Sociology; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.0091557356119518,"score_gpt":0.25186265135822744,"score_spread":0.24270691574627565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407350768","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24380109,0.6100577,0.0002965443,0.031417795,0.0023706406,0.0011699923,0.00036735568,0.00006825072,0.110450655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97475445,0.023469234,0.0000776367,0.001087463,0.00022820666,0.000020774969,0.0000042817705,0.000007136547,0.00035082494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837726,0.00020486208,0.0004103433,0.00024379171,0.00043367466,0.00033008258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915713,0.0004297147,0.00009728996,0.0001500118,0.000089245754,0.000076631644],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011131103,0.00013698153,0.00041198632,0.000020456564,0.0006570525,0.00007264108,0.00023217588,0.00010288392,0.00013491411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004027739,0.000111706664,0.000090930196,0.00024367913,0.0041999966,0.00016019493,0.000067870475,0.00025469429,0.0000016149936],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037726244,0.000026991762,0.0023374436,0.000639101,0.000088976434,0.000023523029,0.008148118,0.000003660001,0.000020224106,0.94455117,0.022831598,0.021291489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020987516,0.00006903253,0.019769933,0.0021190401,0.00030816128,0.000006176859,0.013779684,0.000030049572,0.000065210916,0.13254742,0.83073646,0.00035897357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9788121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.992095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81200373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014933079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023085347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407410707","doi":"10.1017/elo.2024.54","title":"European constitutional scholars in the digital public sphere: reply to Somek and Paar","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Law Open","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Public sphere; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.05835808860626399,"score_gpt":0.31172053186966403,"score_spread":0.2533624432634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407410707","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013432966,0.00063401874,0.000037416205,0.024727017,0.00025196208,0.00033620722,0.00003262817,0.000060971368,0.9604868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99115074,0.000050881747,0.000055291028,0.007222647,0.00036819678,0.000006720888,0.000006782605,0.000008337921,0.0011304171],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984299,0.0005363332,0.00018037173,0.00030012283,0.00030698633,0.00024631474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999576,0.00012645408,0.000020126074,0.0001267731,0.000043434033,0.00010724756],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021787505,0.00009756243,0.00009730404,0.000030662482,0.001000965,0.0030232167,0.00069989834,0.0000104749415,0.00009767334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035356375,0.00007005952,0.000033176795,0.00039520042,0.0015295529,0.0008762502,0.0005377562,0.00017632362,0.0013410519],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046457426,0.000021814685,0.0010846154,0.0000017333588,0.000014274226,0.00019789704,0.002219297,0.0000011518304,0.0000039482775,0.97578466,0.009320316,0.011345637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010162494,0.000020678084,0.010078986,0.000054780376,0.0000046481105,0.00000954207,0.0017564426,5.104912e-7,4.064234e-7,0.0063500437,0.9815094,0.00011294096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013354267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015838409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97771776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004427995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018133732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407562796","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5116585","title":"Judging Readability: A Study of Opinions by Apex-Court Judges from Australia, Canada, South Africa, the United Kingdom, and the United States","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Readability; Kingdom; Apex (geometry); Political science; Law; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.029502324483874937,"score_gpt":0.2910804499321518,"score_spread":0.26157812544827685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407562796","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97488904,0.0013263811,0.00013194283,0.022735393,0.00015481983,0.00030184907,0.000052703494,0.000012570796,0.00039531855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99859667,0.0006558851,0.0000020941334,0.00021911068,0.0000894898,0.00001269461,0.0000153181,0.0000037989657,0.00040493172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976009,0.0005901531,0.00030154496,0.00016237918,0.00046261208,0.00088238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867713,0.0007664342,0.0001699109,0.00012773737,0.00020697949,0.000051783813],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020006637,0.00012638258,0.00022513597,0.00008999639,0.0021513228,0.00007971319,0.00038548495,0.00003975722,0.000012854172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037618788,0.000073201256,0.00005004476,0.0008580196,0.0009049574,0.00005726825,0.00008287355,0.00084694475,4.932295e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024965644,0.00024842098,0.0819923,0.0000037806833,0.0016787119,0.0000024504996,0.05229103,0.00024709516,0.000011699909,0.8576854,0.004754672,0.0008348274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013234405,0.000112303256,0.010496087,0.000041273164,0.00032168668,0.0000021652515,0.47681266,0.000069951915,0.0000067838914,0.43816385,0.07246843,0.00018137324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9732297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96662724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42452163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053407846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028715734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407984527","doi":"10.1177/14748851251314735","title":"Hamilton's fear: Republican judicial review and the separation of complicit powers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; Kelowna General Hospital; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Separation of powers; Philosophy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.01999780710642225,"score_gpt":0.3334159596771743,"score_spread":0.31341815257075206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407984527","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049550966,0.0121383,0.0007828408,0.031540386,0.00023596907,0.00013284724,0.0000044617314,0.000008041785,0.95020205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99177855,0.0020196543,0.000031028067,0.0053637046,0.00024846295,4.5744957e-7,2.2779909e-7,0.000002691044,0.0005552238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974417,0.0017234528,0.0003752898,0.00006583072,0.00022588208,0.00016780956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988456,0.0005691751,0.00016401285,0.00006916544,0.0002670886,0.000084989835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004547123,0.000059491576,0.00025641583,0.00004699577,0.00032228508,0.00002418041,0.00020174496,0.000012305162,0.00006695515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017693401,0.000037288035,0.00010832696,0.00017384965,0.00240309,0.00006875058,0.000048674432,0.0001492912,0.0000036503295],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006155365,0.000015685697,0.000070272516,0.000015425767,0.00005608745,0.0000041226904,0.00043000167,2.1888019e-7,0.0000050768367,0.99520504,0.0022959735,0.0018405179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010876391,0.0001173656,0.015589346,0.00088867976,0.00043231697,0.000017751563,0.0041102525,0.0000011214332,0.000016235983,0.6786451,0.29897222,0.00012195837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008687362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011427362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98682344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033761007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001534205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8854285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408065977","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-68020-5_9","title":"The Law and Judiciary","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Marx, Engels, and Marxisms","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02119088990848591,"score_gpt":0.24815870324725658,"score_spread":0.22696781333877067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408065977","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000037272825,0.055089805,0.00000264374,0.0059357467,0.00096825376,0.0001920256,0.0000399918,0.00007380062,0.93766046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11548043,0.1054076,0.000019180554,0.0019019336,0.002567407,0.00003254847,0.00001133488,0.0000383968,0.77454114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989346,0.000023432945,0.00017428109,0.0003074441,0.00030131586,0.00025892636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994117,0.00026739936,0.00005453995,0.000107957014,0.000053057494,0.000105356536],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042158196,0.00020642631,0.00023402664,0.000031494943,0.0019708467,0.0001977798,0.0001341712,0.00021313432,0.00007117796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029052746,0.00014710966,0.0000766671,0.00002552807,0.0022251252,0.00006226939,0.00021336059,0.0003034301,0.00008944472],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072441794,0.0000023359119,0.000005924111,0.000010785319,0.0000730142,0.000018851337,0.0005404286,2.0713665e-8,0.000001072018,0.9781907,0.0045115496,0.01663807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031812506,0.00001138377,0.000025676336,0.00005259194,0.000050793285,0.0000017338901,0.0002794599,2.6481578e-7,2.9954973e-7,0.45821145,0.5412248,0.00010978259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042078425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014685791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53671324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041534262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007791242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99932843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408092897","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1446","title":"Legislative Choices in Using Section 33 and Judicial Scrutiny","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Section (typography); Legislature; Political science; Law; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.06737450936170093,"score_gpt":0.36371738814732113,"score_spread":0.2963428787856202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408092897","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009862736,0.57425714,0.000089422654,0.0064202347,0.0014206128,0.0006524809,0.0000168808,0.00011389813,0.40716657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90003985,0.09791128,0.00005737965,0.00083656993,0.000997778,0.0000181593,0.0000018319965,0.0000058175037,0.00013130758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990416,0.00013382714,0.00018903973,0.00020284139,0.00024244457,0.00019020624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997314,0.00008800556,0.000031893294,0.000044593344,0.00006005484,0.00004400222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006982576,0.00008853813,0.00021368377,0.000033631026,0.00046093226,0.00006824685,0.00006561103,0.000045102704,0.00009623676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011071527,0.000077545,0.000052307358,0.0003870236,0.00048304806,0.00029736198,0.00004016068,0.00012660687,0.000022092761],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027362466,0.000017470766,0.001154536,0.00032711364,0.000031610372,0.000012662933,0.0011996127,0.0000016247828,0.000025277357,0.9882534,0.00088146393,0.008092499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047037698,0.000010261284,0.00067237054,0.0038644618,0.00005630956,0.0000025544975,0.00014226702,0.00002829564,0.0000026447208,0.014353951,0.9807047,0.00011510172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033948883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03748187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9798233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010483995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001711421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98008156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408226825","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2024-0008","title":"Deference as informed respect: <i>Vavilov’s</i> implications for procedural review of legislative functions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Cégep de Jonquière","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Legislature; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02745905059110631,"score_gpt":0.3123904438579811,"score_spread":0.2849313932668748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408226825","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004553562,0.00917576,0.001976139,0.009331294,0.00014299207,0.00026998974,0.00004072365,0.0000108985905,0.97859687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9494994,0.042643055,0.0013306662,0.00093342963,0.000122181,0.0000019110123,0.0000074417267,0.0000023999376,0.00545948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952656,0.00003288024,0.00014092716,0.00006552101,0.00012517211,0.00010895713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988954,0.00012862842,0.00017117838,0.00005349769,0.00070383685,0.000047449153],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020066045,0.00004609117,0.00014717248,0.000016130674,0.001365648,0.000007915474,0.00018838307,0.00003061865,0.00020091934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026907245,0.00004697097,0.00011533091,0.00008669852,0.0005320075,0.0003228954,0.00003616289,0.00005309952,0.0000018901861],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042787542,0.00003071684,0.00052525324,0.00008258241,0.00006798525,1.9589912e-7,0.0019318338,8.5924137e-7,0.000018858253,0.9788732,0.016308548,0.0021171947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029019895,0.00006447019,0.004891777,0.0011905219,0.0001250275,0.000001946913,0.011330765,3.150405e-7,0.000010048101,0.02794187,0.9540869,0.00006616548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05696863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24860285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9731374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025735178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087092805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408810334","doi":"10.53555/sfs.v10i1.1720","title":"An Analytical Study of Parliamentary Privileges in India with Light On Judicial Review","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Parliament; Politics","score_opus":0.18764166719131925,"score_gpt":0.3605097626380346,"score_spread":0.17286809544671533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408810334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922173,0.0004811066,4.0190787e-7,0.0022558623,0.00022403758,0.00019136966,0.000004670778,0.000006090472,0.004619173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99733573,0.0023683591,0.000014338987,0.00017819346,0.00008927775,0.000004305636,5.845864e-7,0.0000022299998,0.000006984447],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972626,0.00073445094,0.00053019373,0.00015970388,0.0010677209,0.00024533263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990071,0.00042314894,0.0002738902,0.00006588773,0.00015867785,0.00007126675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066743866,0.000090558104,0.00040730156,0.00029716652,0.00026607915,0.000042135613,0.00042625994,0.000031403273,0.00004484088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006731524,0.00006126043,0.00003438638,0.002686876,0.0010788956,0.00046949694,0.00003596253,0.000166869,0.0000022712636],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007780046,0.00034824823,0.9933078,0.000009275641,0.000014733495,0.000052822823,0.0037661092,0.000037631482,0.0000019790525,0.00068251375,0.00084549346,0.0008555803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024136338,0.0014666873,0.97797614,0.00049568457,0.000010767509,0.0000011835224,0.01862644,0.000001587336,0.0000036799245,0.00059288664,0.00050329335,0.000080256745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015132974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11719676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10206379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006995537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048169558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99142534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408824646","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5172897","title":"Failure to Adapt: Readability Deficits in Canadian Court Decisions Involving Parties with Unique Reading Needs","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Readability; Reading (process); Psychology; Business; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.021685429350912205,"score_gpt":0.2838589700860755,"score_spread":0.2621735407351633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408824646","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76142186,0.016008103,0.006709281,0.11424916,0.0015740581,0.0022934373,0.00014038195,0.00018637381,0.09741734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99283355,0.0054330938,0.00027669754,0.00029161767,0.000309344,0.000050111765,0.0000058133587,0.000010241683,0.0007895444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953366,0.0003393508,0.00044032853,0.0003585286,0.00057832437,0.0029468476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985005,0.00029436854,0.00015332278,0.00020766171,0.00043248516,0.00041164467],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00403704,0.00027524304,0.00044504832,0.0006733749,0.001693457,0.00019395527,0.0006305952,0.00029846586,0.000018634828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013045013,0.00024603715,0.00011513142,0.00095947133,0.00030507176,0.00014923199,0.00021775089,0.0033361828,0.000007740443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052252282,0.000028598304,0.04345172,0.0000060859497,0.00014044355,0.000013964983,0.006503708,0.0014805772,0.0000021493117,0.94351196,0.00045044837,0.0043580695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015226565,0.00010586854,0.0032754347,0.0011585992,0.00007857689,0.0000210641,0.062317967,0.000020164676,0.0000055568134,0.8894576,0.042909134,0.00049778796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86284846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23141167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009194835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.060596477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409143079","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5202941","title":"What is the Standard of Review for (Mixed) Constitutional Questions?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.016540829774327498,"score_gpt":0.33252272659232324,"score_spread":0.3159818968179957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409143079","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00072962797,0.68189174,0.039118305,0.24714737,0.0020404132,0.00076393766,0.000033518816,0.000024954035,0.028250124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43797272,0.55826527,0.000045602013,0.0020003452,0.00024568787,0.000028376264,0.0000013829317,0.0000016933568,0.0014389147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859244,0.000108438784,0.00024296388,0.000092067516,0.000304478,0.0006596311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914515,0.00021274011,0.00011565154,0.00006415214,0.0004358521,0.000026434423],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028199316,0.00006815828,0.00017544329,0.000036486243,0.001484985,0.000051043135,0.00022337343,0.000035605273,0.00003820377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042336155,0.000046535108,0.00015494661,0.0002558979,0.0013504525,0.00021193372,0.000023922703,0.00036237895,0.00000406676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022323065,0.000012521457,0.00014408803,0.000014760513,0.00011502586,9.506243e-8,0.00010750013,0.0000014093933,0.0000017366461,0.97391135,0.005499345,0.020169867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000118676646,0.000036916346,0.00004000885,0.00049053377,0.00006436909,0.000004575646,0.002980999,4.1105e-7,0.000008074238,0.6251172,0.37110165,0.00003661716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022475366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003393029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43724307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048963976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0090068905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409460564","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5216773","title":"Evaluating the Constitutionality of Bill 21 Amid Restricted Judicial Review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Law; Political science; Judicial review; Law and economics; Supreme court; Economics","score_opus":0.08206943971429005,"score_gpt":0.413043261643368,"score_spread":0.330973821929078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409460564","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021541975,0.675646,0.002716179,0.09568212,0.0057467544,0.0029170923,0.00023941898,0.0001451064,0.19536535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6242952,0.37292084,0.000061204766,0.0006959124,0.0012798615,0.000040437684,0.000013946481,0.0000048497736,0.00068774587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952034,0.001097498,0.000796208,0.0003046864,0.0012309847,0.0013672748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99743617,0.00045323375,0.00078961236,0.00023449793,0.0010216103,0.00006486296],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008311048,0.00022422575,0.00055409473,0.000095853,0.001988452,0.00004936309,0.0008582088,0.00019848939,0.000068093206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036905748,0.0001429155,0.00039509943,0.00057622895,0.0016382121,0.00007279774,0.00039080266,0.0032585864,0.000008397608],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003362115,0.00004755966,0.0006311542,0.00006653461,0.00039075295,0.0000010736898,0.00021528213,0.00011125486,0.000005044763,0.9858626,0.00081993255,0.011815151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020270483,0.00007678053,0.0008245519,0.0022742832,0.00046477854,0.000013346286,0.001115139,0.000010714164,0.0000022100019,0.98001444,0.014804968,0.00019606622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024505422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015587092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6027532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016297107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045508094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99931085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409707895","doi":"10.1080/02722011.2024.2435195","title":"Moving Toward a Government Trust Ecosystem in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Review of Canadian Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; MacEwan University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Ecosystem; Business; Environmental resource management; Political science; Environmental planning; Public relations; Geography; Environmental science; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.034616827203602145,"score_gpt":0.299403084550472,"score_spread":0.26478625734686984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409707895","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043862183,0.8203588,8.050856e-7,0.06572211,0.0004580292,0.00040385377,0.000120242046,0.000013030682,0.069060944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7181241,0.27972433,0.000005964043,0.001981039,0.00007322182,0.000033600132,2.1245029e-7,0.0000027666058,0.00005477947],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987796,0.00013716206,0.00024893548,0.00012536738,0.00043527156,0.00027369513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994543,0.00022991243,0.000080902704,0.00008882648,0.00005744959,0.00008859914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000597837,0.00008821787,0.00039423606,0.000052457315,0.00024265825,0.000010393446,0.00020076,0.000005147326,0.000025733647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031770495,0.000058899703,0.000058603742,0.0011033216,0.00045067613,0.00003436278,0.000039375034,0.00007434894,0.000007612229],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010131694,0.00001283692,0.023077121,0.0050034686,0.0011130442,0.0002808294,0.020973187,0.000012668708,0.0000033629503,0.3575465,0.15812804,0.4338388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018918878,0.000012039451,0.006382985,0.0050063776,0.00005487208,0.0000014535776,0.04802738,0.0000032621097,0.0000012681896,0.000627732,0.93974906,0.00011462026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9994395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78162104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023235988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004180025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74151844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409824887","doi":"10.1017/9781009010078","title":"The Impasse of Constitutional Rights","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.018715588462045355,"score_gpt":0.2360838881387498,"score_spread":0.21736829967670446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409824887","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000014127214,0.000668109,0.00013783295,0.00014801703,0.00058136217,0.00027811018,0.00028722428,0.00004357732,0.99784166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0039578355,0.00033217567,0.000008999147,0.000029001378,0.0002256951,0.0000010327369,0.000014489647,0.0000019362437,0.99542886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989205,0.000107208536,0.00015058642,0.0002022216,0.0003959904,0.00022350127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882144,0.00039984318,0.00016391922,0.00017006036,0.0003714755,0.000073243755],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020516472,0.00014642037,0.00024025796,0.0000645257,0.002404146,0.000029368473,0.0005289913,0.00019792719,0.0000024827464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054203254,0.00012538636,0.00018620488,0.000024967356,0.007347761,0.00004663146,0.00022806843,0.00022639707,0.0000048789393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026286129,0.0000058168957,0.000003701208,0.000008463259,0.000120811994,0.000016266435,0.000058503334,4.3353407e-7,5.44778e-7,0.7643482,0.23524229,0.00016870374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015199499,0.000008285075,0.000018582317,0.000116088435,0.0001252842,5.342542e-7,0.00015375137,5.1457295e-7,0.000012496607,0.001615567,0.9976673,0.00012958696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004528843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038847406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7627326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003608014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028734938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409910943","doi":"10.1017/cls.2024.29","title":"The Chambers List Is Long Today and Every Day: A Qualitative Exploration of the Potentiality of Person-Centred Justice in Vancouver’s Supreme Court of British Columbia","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.03469309548954022,"score_gpt":0.28211285861897023,"score_spread":0.24741976312943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409910943","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9822524,0.006296938,0.000030109251,0.00602664,0.001128957,0.00021353367,0.00038676517,0.0000024463327,0.0036621722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997926,0.0011197425,0.000021080203,0.00031442437,0.00009209583,0.0000024676544,0.0000014050976,0.0000053516833,0.00051742914],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882996,0.00024474753,0.0003705296,0.0001227837,0.00017360396,0.00025840325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998694,0.00039830102,0.00024894098,0.000066345834,0.00037266838,0.00021976331],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015260767,0.0000694933,0.0002759729,0.000015057123,0.0007239656,0.00010776686,0.00014914654,0.00008512333,0.000021439088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022928193,0.00007437742,0.0001863347,0.00023781467,0.002197343,0.0003008339,0.000016685668,0.00020552201,4.1450953e-8],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009390326,0.000018053403,0.0029442278,0.0002391332,0.00029755954,0.0000333983,0.80474335,0.000012714578,0.000018208864,0.17557265,0.014487212,0.0016241231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042864916,0.000063271604,0.013279676,0.0008337728,0.00025483704,0.000016056088,0.9397087,0.00007042852,0.0000069610214,0.029956551,0.015210024,0.00017107495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88562196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1456161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003678649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018076192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80962014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410002500","doi":"10.21991/cf29489","title":"A Kick in the Caboose: Recovering the Judicial Horizontality of Constitutional Equality Rights","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02899769913866132,"score_gpt":0.3149318039569513,"score_spread":0.28593410481828996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410002500","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023608752,0.0035321573,0.04776875,0.043275822,0.00512017,0.0022464746,0.00061045174,0.00016779377,0.8736696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965983,0.00016977561,0.00015559893,0.0022556155,0.00033018028,0.00021554223,0.00005464581,0.0000033822178,0.00021693324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99538785,0.0006614979,0.0011551616,0.00060157105,0.0012390445,0.0009548739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971832,0.001270063,0.00033624118,0.00048705874,0.0006015866,0.000121866964],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002732573,0.0003963231,0.0005744025,0.0002977797,0.0061129616,0.00015142892,0.0011510577,0.0002904415,0.00015096384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014615448,0.00027767906,0.00040375724,0.00164798,0.04393308,0.0006366325,0.00029052672,0.0006311271,0.00005820013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012161614,0.00024561989,0.024698636,0.000016226575,0.0001343908,0.000018443998,0.0005125709,0.00033046657,0.000035334004,0.9679737,0.005299003,0.00061401195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001234696,0.00003740197,0.0076434,0.000318835,0.00011647796,0.00003706052,0.00785443,0.000041902003,0.00008231641,0.51889485,0.4633335,0.00040510204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014896366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024101697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97298956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006167913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065826867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410080155","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5199576","title":"Candour in Judicial Review Proceedings in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Judicial review; Law; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.014153808235025942,"score_gpt":0.28370365630391464,"score_spread":0.2695498480688887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410080155","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14090033,0.5213078,0.000033466466,0.073275864,0.0034200659,0.0018265116,0.00004801539,0.00003760337,0.25915033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6672473,0.33109033,0.0000036466129,0.0007202016,0.00046324663,0.000033250923,0.0000020323012,0.000003654088,0.00043634154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965596,0.0001020958,0.0005079374,0.00026681126,0.0005960618,0.0019674795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941176,0.000048507183,0.00022619119,0.000052620646,0.00018754914,0.00007334652],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027009929,0.00018814135,0.00051052344,0.00015509002,0.0003559189,0.000038136262,0.000509865,0.000121216166,0.000026122736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046847202,0.00018500115,0.00009833813,0.00050220906,0.000114158676,0.00007477571,0.00018752622,0.003779326,0.0000022742574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042510845,0.00005321238,0.09636501,0.0002237329,0.00014644874,0.000035079513,0.0009168844,0.000040834402,4.5848486e-7,0.8777639,0.0050775097,0.019334372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004918789,0.000022669328,0.0075561646,0.0070723565,0.000079650934,0.00001598477,0.01119935,0.0000047360018,6.8559063e-7,0.92670363,0.046406563,0.00044631632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99608564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.526347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01673894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15283816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998519},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410138015","doi":"10.1177/13540688251339622","title":"Does it matter who is in charge? Ministerial characteristics and pledge fulfilment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Party Politics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pledge; Charge (physics); Political science; Physics; Law; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.023262226030495554,"score_gpt":0.30920622982466744,"score_spread":0.2859440037941719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410138015","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63403845,0.00018356617,0.00002952436,0.06723287,0.0020381256,0.00028727524,0.0002344687,0.000027474032,0.29592827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809786,0.00021457675,0.000027603272,0.0069552055,0.00047991984,0.000019156249,0.00000480103,0.0000027487918,0.011317356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991863,0.000047358586,0.0001895413,0.00014665826,0.0001354219,0.00029472483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971837,0.00007477109,0.000032778044,0.00006748092,0.000044501932,0.00006209036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014523049,0.00008304445,0.0001617912,0.00004285945,0.00035823483,0.000065353954,0.000081973914,0.000058346257,0.0003793311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000716958,0.00006120868,0.000026245994,0.000084201456,0.00045309428,0.000050601695,0.00007714639,0.000059826383,0.00009370125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011615182,0.0000597053,0.24435982,0.00002865008,0.000025489027,0.000004493256,0.009208924,1.8890827e-8,0.000019551904,0.720551,0.025383886,0.00034683887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023232141,0.000009405647,0.10292193,0.00007389388,0.00002088345,1.8654544e-7,0.0021436268,0.0000058156265,0.000094105606,0.029302325,0.8650604,0.00013511536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015933539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009981382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8396765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006851881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001379428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41534093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410158590","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i1.1717","title":"Judicial Review of Rulemaking","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Rulemaking; Political science; Judicial review; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.030213038833962876,"score_gpt":0.344318470434393,"score_spread":0.31410543160043014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410158590","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018411344,0.02027591,0.000053959022,0.005472845,0.0006322694,0.000064100735,0.0000059833387,0.000011544299,0.97329926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9771756,0.019357612,0.000118769116,0.0029496837,0.00029485184,0.000002086604,2.6953302e-7,0.0000016002933,0.000099510355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999175,0.00009193204,0.00024155548,0.000060725026,0.00028233405,0.00014845161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953943,0.000059253525,0.00010733752,0.00003866811,0.00021562378,0.000039681454],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071490614,0.000047168473,0.00016817001,0.000030098363,0.004752678,0.00001502424,0.00013969374,0.000027827102,0.0001768905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026182638,0.000040010353,0.00009900523,0.00022376359,0.00048536822,0.00008144332,0.00003739067,0.000116941526,0.000008746787],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034175173,0.000014672473,0.0001622652,0.000053358395,0.000028330147,0.0000044299745,0.00004659568,3.3186177e-7,0.0000040381124,0.9901858,0.0013799662,0.008116774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073463954,0.0000077088725,0.00029579096,0.0027331836,0.00003376176,0.0000030669275,0.0001825987,1.2533346e-7,0.000029414174,0.055169847,0.9414298,0.00004126455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066683465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012081476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9769915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006641373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007332355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410450760","doi":"10.1177/00031224251333087","title":"Frame Backfire: The Trouble with Civil Rights Appeals in the Contemporary United States","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Civil rights; Frame (networking); Political science; Law; Political economy; Criminology; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.050714674342801705,"score_gpt":0.35649512454922794,"score_spread":0.30578045020642625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410450760","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04726818,0.20880575,0.00016448257,0.34331313,0.00010117113,0.0018049668,0.000017742446,0.000109065484,0.3984155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87646097,0.07672704,0.000018760236,0.046454884,0.0000561176,0.00014336024,0.000012220415,0.0000015113718,0.00012512018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977891,0.00126216,0.00023722397,0.00019089831,0.00026025102,0.00026037628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980685,0.0015561804,0.0001257885,0.00014293622,0.00007295622,0.000033616725],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013747322,0.000118738986,0.00038169365,0.000018518283,0.00087200815,0.00002900148,0.00045534348,0.000037591995,0.00006558561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038397047,0.000045651544,0.00008890556,0.0012283819,0.004859433,0.000042682314,0.000051277973,0.0002749926,0.00003188872],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024432613,0.000101025056,0.010951263,0.000038194805,0.00007925935,0.000012798412,0.002976751,0.0000022240135,3.6034166e-7,0.92614096,0.052280676,0.00739208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008482812,0.000072810646,0.008383355,0.0004290998,0.00002730248,3.5973753e-7,0.008266096,9.962716e-7,9.10185e-8,0.06155994,0.9210864,0.00008876254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01977284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022906712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8688057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005255879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019060995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99784875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410462573","doi":"10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i03.44967","title":"CONSTITUTIONALISM IN INDIA: A COMPARATIVE STUDY","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Medicine; Political science; Law; Democracy","score_opus":0.2157722951052258,"score_gpt":0.5652989592671241,"score_spread":0.34952666416189837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410462573","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7424085,0.0009154269,0.00075179624,0.025138361,0.0053238445,0.0020249325,0.00005753675,0.00003738729,0.2233422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969992,0.00012944838,0.00015597252,0.000056447305,0.00058522366,0.00017593191,0.000006149778,0.0000027658082,0.0018888653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973925,0.00045873178,0.00036278839,0.00022831395,0.001171572,0.00038614272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99740773,0.0010676958,0.000060587197,0.00006675266,0.001307962,0.00008924033],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037081614,0.000092206756,0.00018450162,0.0007784279,0.0022046356,0.00020542485,0.00068349164,0.000064814274,0.000054531807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008118449,0.00008392096,0.000091203234,0.0006220916,0.0010795274,0.0002903262,0.00027521496,0.0005218717,0.000027500877],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005565251,0.0011807464,0.12679675,0.000002241794,0.0002534549,0.00015281378,0.01946834,0.000061032082,0.00003911065,0.8447223,0.0053050844,0.0014616149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003816686,0.00024622786,0.30828533,0.00024032037,0.00001622439,0.000014668989,0.15670834,0.00014507347,0.000027448481,0.43677658,0.093502626,0.00022045932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018713976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004726083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40794572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007413184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015072488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99909437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410508113","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2025.6","title":"Political Legitimacy, Judicial Review, and the Legislative Override","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"University of Waterloo","keywords":"Legitimacy; Legislature; Politics; Political science; Judicial review; Law and economics; Law; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.016584028814165323,"score_gpt":0.3208468177391687,"score_spread":0.30426278892500336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410508113","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00080277625,0.055773173,0.000108593274,0.112918615,0.0005533857,0.00019325718,0.0000127803505,0.000004353417,0.82963306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98178214,0.0024744233,0.00003175116,0.014919705,0.0003776671,0.0000038517187,1.5940878e-7,0.000002119204,0.00040820526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884987,0.00019195737,0.0002787313,0.00009306665,0.00024034089,0.00034603555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998828,0.0003372954,0.00010736848,0.00006853103,0.00032057345,0.0003382173],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094498927,0.00008151293,0.0002732508,0.00005308925,0.0012415021,0.000083830084,0.00029943802,0.000042467007,0.000060838018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00097127137,0.000057407513,0.000090146816,0.00022204668,0.0043961895,0.0002048755,0.000024682402,0.0002373245,0.0000054276343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009875256,0.0000026529901,0.0007534649,0.000010135519,0.000037061087,0.000029870447,0.0008329743,3.347466e-7,4.4621905e-7,0.9917376,0.0062868563,0.00029869445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032606092,0.0000175752,0.0025987898,0.00071103795,0.00016527789,0.000019198062,0.0006562807,7.1777754e-7,0.000003885593,0.262518,0.7328989,0.00008432487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23684649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36419055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9809793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018218646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033591443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99831325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411157373","doi":"10.1017/s0008423925000034","title":"Notwithstanding Centralism: The Resurgence of the Notwithstanding Clause and the Conservative Provincial Rights Movement","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Centralized government; Movement (music); Political science; Political economy; Law; Economics; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.020952680074354153,"score_gpt":0.291062601205534,"score_spread":0.2701099211311799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411157373","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81728166,0.00055452593,0.00032374958,0.1263956,0.0017343871,0.00048867817,0.000035995592,0.000003765004,0.053181663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979013,0.0000133333,0.000017497288,0.0018364149,0.00012564812,0.0000014446631,1.7847348e-8,9.26078e-7,0.00010337574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826765,0.00020325079,0.00029546377,0.00010452572,0.00056297623,0.00056616135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837935,0.00062182324,0.00014514457,0.00009623214,0.0004059127,0.00035151042],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027967992,0.000069456204,0.00014985172,0.0000747781,0.0035594357,0.00013142233,0.00066069653,0.000028098139,0.000016686281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002811043,0.000030028938,0.000065568056,0.0007862401,0.015613341,0.00016689223,0.00006273619,0.0001937271,3.572621e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014284638,0.0000030103474,0.01625117,0.0000015594713,0.00001171137,0.0000032933267,0.0035768081,0.0000025314455,0.000020993193,0.9798244,0.00022935728,0.00006083466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005357804,0.000031611246,0.3008073,0.0002901123,0.00007665347,0.0000066652146,0.018217068,0.00004482669,0.0006845602,0.6679484,0.011239329,0.00011767793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30605677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36952484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31187603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005404795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063627027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411622319","doi":"10.1017/s0008423925000186","title":"Constraining the Court: Judicial Power and Policy Implementation in the Charter EraJames B. Kelly , Vancouver: UBC Press, 2024, pp. 448","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Power (physics); Law and economics; Sociology; Physics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.01764598244167476,"score_gpt":0.33384840164320106,"score_spread":0.3162024192015263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411622319","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38040668,0.0017905466,0.00010679587,0.19224963,0.0024692963,0.00043192456,0.000058501413,0.000006668668,0.42247996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99465555,0.000040249954,0.000013121396,0.004876892,0.00036543095,0.000002694112,9.5030686e-8,0.00000109891,0.00004485724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984105,0.000119329896,0.00023369385,0.00010489526,0.0004001766,0.000731354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905246,0.0002534489,0.00006301668,0.00005649194,0.00019499027,0.00037959148],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019342421,0.00006692591,0.000108119144,0.00012853096,0.0014714528,0.00021812563,0.0004255931,0.000029576313,0.00008003651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009942354,0.000041094023,0.000036871515,0.00057808857,0.004748437,0.00023987221,0.00002446128,0.00019888835,0.000001449751],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019689387,0.000003982685,0.014215809,6.9348596e-7,0.000005195534,0.000011870861,0.00431871,6.544148e-7,0.000005295175,0.97356117,0.0060433173,0.0018313315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034249524,0.00006519127,0.61764234,0.000068620284,0.000028820705,0.000017991651,0.07588467,0.000006625758,0.000018307963,0.1720435,0.13375725,0.00012419933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39764872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.62484515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80151767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036039474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008246442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411656908","doi":"10.51847/gfj4hqxfly","title":"10.51847/Gfj4HQxflY","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Administrative court; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.01334517138857484,"score_gpt":0.2280520539463514,"score_spread":0.21470688255777656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411656908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008410809,0.000105986845,2.7420396e-7,0.0024246925,0.00000473193,0.00008762486,0.0000050321914,0.00008138211,0.9964492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007229119,0.0000026304558,0.000021227104,0.00017795702,0.00031101384,0.0000097836855,0.0000012738992,0.000002767062,0.99224424],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939567,0.000031636555,0.000071392125,0.000106016334,0.00020314122,0.00019215293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997699,0.00003480556,0.0000092626515,0.000055397857,0.00003970121,0.000090907415],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013563292,0.000051702882,0.00007710234,0.00001964271,0.00051481306,0.000027321015,0.00012589926,0.000029343759,0.98651594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052929183,0.000049144484,0.000033584543,0.000189347,0.00018017854,0.00006273094,0.000018086972,0.000033450324,0.9769029],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002088087,0.000023968902,0.0000022697486,4.2728126e-7,0.000011522631,0.0000028101422,0.00023866806,0.000008567523,0.0000031746115,0.0019140618,0.03410296,0.9636707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043036707,0.00002047513,0.00018202957,0.000005734271,0.0000055341516,2.6061116e-7,0.000015645273,0.0000010941599,9.4201545e-7,0.00021911385,0.9994311,0.00007504752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020291393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024601342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9653281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035150868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007007653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39595777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411724707","doi":"10.1093/icon/moaf021","title":"Chief justices and democratic resilience: Judicial leadership in times of constitutional crisis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Resilience (materials science); Political science; Law; Political economy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.04276085852462981,"score_gpt":0.3309494178866684,"score_spread":0.2881885593620386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411724707","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029943846,0.008401561,0.008718006,0.051392943,0.005300311,0.0003645318,0.00013185892,0.000031570708,0.89571536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969272,0.00045655266,0.00058987585,0.0014655906,0.00041643402,0.000004557811,0.0000039724573,0.0000016827936,0.0001341211],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767935,0.00014423796,0.00076388847,0.00017652844,0.0010026803,0.0002332994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978625,0.00057467725,0.00035584343,0.00005596139,0.0010621463,0.00008886717],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096584694,0.00013773564,0.00033110022,0.00040975772,0.00040952995,0.000064935484,0.0004323495,0.00010955956,0.00025709535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009411641,0.00012996401,0.0001254883,0.00032878466,0.01148455,0.00052039325,0.000082737475,0.00024979937,0.0000052479218],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018276124,0.00013331808,0.0109638795,0.000013301188,0.00017757206,0.000046457422,0.00030681017,0.00033197834,0.0000818359,0.98580813,0.0013420647,0.0006118782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024081261,0.00009872527,0.015668148,0.0013479539,0.00019913107,0.00012820073,0.0075209467,0.000053238182,0.00047948372,0.9046361,0.06710658,0.00035336928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013057552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012571939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9669834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020864462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023157604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99120563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411921775","doi":"10.17473/2240-7987-2025-1-2","title":"Ferrara’s Principles of Constitutional Legitimacy: From Plato to Rawls, and Backwards?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Filosofia e questioni pubbliche.","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Legitimacy; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.03997018694438847,"score_gpt":0.32346847533443523,"score_spread":0.28349828839004676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411921775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16732445,0.0030297996,0.0065636877,0.03667676,0.0013423432,0.00087383564,0.00057110057,0.000243603,0.7833744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99510235,0.00016206513,0.0017297992,0.0009448022,0.00027878516,0.00005535648,0.0000369415,0.0000034018717,0.0016864791],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987006,0.000098722936,0.00029436726,0.00030072004,0.0003578785,0.00024767776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991133,0.0002496784,0.00007560075,0.00013051581,0.00028928946,0.00014160352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033507886,0.00013490244,0.00025137627,0.0001414869,0.00076718425,0.00007985509,0.0002007615,0.00011085165,0.00024920196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009175075,0.00013744956,0.000057995687,0.00044195342,0.0018813104,0.0002133303,0.00014997597,0.00011177982,0.000056828987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033122396,0.00004760068,0.025109375,0.000006520483,0.00006399322,0.0000019283634,0.000551028,0.000024751394,0.000108854234,0.96796113,0.0049553723,0.0011363248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047229597,0.000035130288,0.124923296,0.00028499006,0.00006346711,0.0000011106737,0.00092258776,0.000022344706,0.00048901286,0.17753327,0.69497114,0.00028135756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010721854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026393372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8277779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012475383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009931191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412073517","doi":"10.7202/1118441ar","title":"Methodology for Interpreting Constitutional Legislation: Crucially Different or Much the Same?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Constitutional interpretation; Constitutional review; Law and economics; Law; Constitutional law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Constitution","score_opus":0.08724610839841461,"score_gpt":0.35390167472601364,"score_spread":0.266655566327599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412073517","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057938404,0.007929684,0.4229262,0.11146027,0.008232986,0.0019581832,0.00020136032,0.00058395346,0.38876897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99258703,0.00021589868,0.0022094715,0.00062430423,0.0019665342,0.00013696043,0.0000074006703,0.0000057046736,0.0022466728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989387,0.00018673528,0.00020853303,0.00021768543,0.00015850765,0.0002898652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814624,0.0015851182,0.000045015666,0.00007893408,0.00009010921,0.00005459797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095161994,0.000078047204,0.00017646127,0.00004427852,0.00093546184,0.00011660443,0.0002118666,0.000084055304,0.00017413402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012597187,0.00006749369,0.0001421282,0.00018699975,0.0013084698,0.000100269506,0.000053581312,0.00014039034,0.00003333067],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046863635,0.000011204639,0.000502194,0.000019487741,0.000058121375,0.0000096545855,0.0033252242,0.000013874902,0.000057751044,0.98145247,0.0010879792,0.013415208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013602586,0.000052706604,0.0011090903,0.0002615673,0.00007834613,0.000032319516,0.0027728758,0.00033919085,0.000038565566,0.76361316,0.23139147,0.00017466575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006812673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033654228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93464863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025243737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005607026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71949106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412190459","doi":"10.38003/ccsr.4.7-8.1","title":"Constitutional Discourses in East Asia Today","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cross-cultural studies review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"East Asia; Political science; Law; China","score_opus":0.07030696683422978,"score_gpt":0.44035243811957214,"score_spread":0.3700454712853424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412190459","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00485358,0.6360487,0.000005641431,0.026734497,0.0008587826,0.00047548418,0.000018626562,0.00006305712,0.33094168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64189416,0.3534375,0.00002824369,0.0018231673,0.00021308938,0.00013871111,0.0000071031413,0.0000015552596,0.0024564555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850994,0.00010888902,0.00040357973,0.00028646138,0.00032723125,0.00036388627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991126,0.00012709423,0.00008318376,0.00009202632,0.00053276337,0.000052332813],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051244826,0.00017845666,0.00049980235,0.000025155907,0.0017780128,0.00010683683,0.00023991661,0.000052091204,0.00015341713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018675386,0.0001231708,0.00015561868,0.0006974088,0.008187602,0.00038429655,0.00016752999,0.000144596,0.0001097919],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059813838,0.000038326645,0.016324487,0.00024440084,0.00010706731,0.000008759934,0.0006487447,0.000001987458,0.0000023868083,0.9465693,0.016036851,0.020011678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019455388,0.0000068175964,0.01823844,0.002800056,0.00005325753,0.0000014384032,0.004401315,1.3109738e-7,0.0000027957574,0.009709604,0.96441656,0.0001750053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007448674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033469503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94837976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030928082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024774074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99952155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412257729","doi":"","title":"Pierre Bourdieu's Sociology of Law:From the Genesis of the State to the Globalisation of Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology of law; Globalization; State (computer science); Law; Sociology; Social science; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05746031047779289,"score_gpt":0.3062683316807427,"score_spread":0.24880802120294981,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412257729","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7717018,0.0024005012,0.00013316143,0.010376413,0.00007356955,0.0009469173,0.0002541212,0.000007264797,0.21410622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96966106,0.0004123187,0.00006549645,0.000106543834,0.000026644446,3.231852e-7,0.000006025107,0.000004268906,0.02971735],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966289,0.0015749652,0.00020038206,0.00022245264,0.0010266472,0.00034668646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99696463,0.0010790507,0.00033940133,0.00048451198,0.0010418084,0.00009056604],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019035763,0.00011400468,0.00035550835,0.000038888367,0.002766578,0.000012086346,0.0021749139,0.000095775875,0.032999314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016328447,0.00007719567,0.0002394859,0.0005587109,0.009742011,0.0002641665,0.0012791785,0.00019498702,0.0019237839],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056642253,0.00016467216,0.00024806388,0.000042415028,0.0006941142,0.000005194506,0.16362695,0.00035715668,0.0060066134,0.13693179,0.6886325,0.0027240957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007244256,0.00021172992,0.105619244,0.00010879621,0.00019453299,5.255899e-7,0.20821895,0.000031466392,0.0026965472,0.0033695176,0.67864573,0.00017855337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3861949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07847162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30772328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018138815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004953662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412266769","doi":"","title":"The Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism – a book review","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Commonwealth; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.15271988086893148,"score_gpt":0.3895895630309104,"score_spread":0.23686968216197893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412266769","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000025418642,0.70382774,0.000283812,0.001722028,0.000053381278,0.0013463668,0.00020953115,0.000013962696,0.29254064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0002377908,0.7440046,0.000046198238,0.0000709131,0.000030066292,5.599828e-7,0.000032731157,0.000008774647,0.25556833],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993768,0.0029556367,0.000457284,0.00042544582,0.0017676513,0.000626022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99444073,0.002383206,0.00090791174,0.0007291389,0.0012928003,0.00024619306],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058716335,0.00028324357,0.0016830292,0.00014559302,0.006359532,0.00002150202,0.0030674387,0.00025668324,0.059357822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046064018,0.00023376546,0.0008395191,0.0010757833,0.011326363,0.00026722907,0.0014344774,0.00062985724,0.011286054],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006256212,0.000050075618,5.575578e-8,0.0034069032,0.00034605287,0.000012021454,0.0008564081,0.000008579022,7.584452e-7,0.05631557,0.91478276,0.024158234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024149296,0.000059714577,0.0000034185132,0.007683187,0.0006163756,0.0000024857197,0.0020301829,0.000017139952,7.8958215e-7,0.00012337524,0.98901755,0.00020427593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074684964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064588175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07423478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000599744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004911843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99914086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412395962","doi":"10.1590/2317-6172202526","title":"Pensando o Direito e Desenvolvimento com Mariana Mota Prado: a riqueza dos acasos, dos diálogos reflexivos e das traduções que transcendem barreiras","year":2025,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Direito GV","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Logos Bible Software; Humanities; Political science; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04794805250201174,"score_gpt":0.36718948630491294,"score_spread":0.3192414338029012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412395962","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03214366,0.17816292,0.003820448,0.098391056,0.0067204298,0.009836621,0.0014840328,0.0014068038,0.668034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9616266,0.011052144,0.000076270764,0.0016234774,0.0013357288,0.0002953664,0.00008245388,0.000064707405,0.023843236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921162,0.0013650064,0.0016312365,0.0016818672,0.0015355365,0.0016701226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99661016,0.00089724344,0.0005339904,0.00091163075,0.00041657896,0.00063037855],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015793267,0.0011120818,0.0018197116,0.00031422393,0.0032731965,0.00088154076,0.0014643533,0.0006993846,0.00081892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074317894,0.0010531622,0.00094761694,0.0019648154,0.001981445,0.0006094642,0.00035928393,0.0010040086,0.00037024988],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053851213,0.00091318006,0.015208436,0.00072056544,0.0016094261,0.000261477,0.0063809846,0.000012950498,0.0008843672,0.901786,0.055515923,0.016168153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019314239,0.00018838781,0.011790661,0.002173804,0.001111117,0.000011414752,0.0041492004,0.00012157442,0.00027231098,0.0072861505,0.9695092,0.0014547638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011494929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00471017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92948294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011149267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017877101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412561668","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5349824","title":"In Defence of Section 33: Why the Notwithstanding Clause Supports Democratic Governance and Individual Rights in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Democracy; Political science; Corporate governance; Democratic governance; Law and economics; Law; Business; Economics; Finance; Politics; Advertising","score_opus":0.012232823928792939,"score_gpt":0.25202269634030994,"score_spread":0.239789872411517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412561668","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9810088,0.007184581,0.00021134004,0.0045009064,0.0012197092,0.00032728893,0.000045176566,0.000004542534,0.005497656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915941,0.007898157,0.0000075464004,0.00012965193,0.00019848444,0.0000087312155,0.0000011854573,0.0000020546786,0.00016012462],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977728,0.00021890276,0.00036734022,0.00019372732,0.00053881196,0.0009083953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935204,0.00017193425,0.0002973175,0.00007239306,0.0000692752,0.000037016565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017482657,0.00013340727,0.0002574573,0.00007497175,0.00051255,0.00003879949,0.00030088268,0.00009809606,0.000009336328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014851116,0.00010239001,0.000042324475,0.00029854322,0.00023533097,0.00012267973,0.00014527058,0.001983422,1.1665064e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005384723,0.000036992584,0.21096326,0.000026170575,0.00017704602,0.000029350065,0.0040279203,0.00051852415,0.000003427837,0.7818169,0.0006748034,0.0016717372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026809983,0.000026019206,0.037301544,0.00036792958,0.00004965513,0.000022543914,0.007049523,0.000019267974,0.00000950101,0.95227295,0.0024370267,0.00017593759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9789408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17366172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004240001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024710128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412636754","doi":"10.15290/sup.2024.08.04","title":"The Constitutional Development of Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studia Sieci Uniwersytetów Pogranicza","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.01920483588122486,"score_gpt":0.27385689368713545,"score_spread":0.2546520578059106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412636754","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014259051,0.023150489,0.0008535296,0.012701847,0.0061892,0.00049236935,0.000060701583,0.00014132836,0.9421515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980319,0.00039313082,0.00014743595,0.000090001115,0.00026962627,0.000022708306,0.0000027446172,0.0000037876412,0.0010386658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844235,0.000064213054,0.00027205286,0.00017477846,0.00068979803,0.00035681936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991147,0.00049378566,0.000041695166,0.00008847244,0.00017466811,0.00008668012],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005974079,0.00010746816,0.00013940636,0.000034824043,0.002671863,0.000056137218,0.00025271013,0.00003553665,0.00006745473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022760643,0.00007676724,0.00006546067,0.0004653569,0.0022019357,0.00006756133,0.000073608426,0.00011778526,0.000019203106],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071984223,0.000013522276,0.00040307263,0.0000052148976,0.00016273017,0.000010093877,0.0026309981,0.00000523749,0.000012815757,0.9747521,0.015073916,0.006923096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007618959,0.00000629589,0.0014767222,0.000043422755,0.00001889067,8.510071e-7,0.006192763,0.0000026673522,0.000033330893,0.0060034613,0.9860377,0.00010774285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15081745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8390988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9837729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029817317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011132663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99862653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412664356","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/sfvjk_v1","title":"Canadian Constitutional Hybridity: The Determinative Influence of Civil Law on the Supreme Court and Federal Institutions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Determinative; Supreme court; Law; Hybridity; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04729672733621472,"score_gpt":0.3095783530890245,"score_spread":0.2622816257528098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412664356","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056122035,0.00029820603,0.00008220457,0.05400217,0.00051053084,0.00069171406,0.0006330353,0.000029404544,0.8876307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99487656,0.00032796492,0.000017105105,0.00396981,0.0001342501,0.00008432412,0.000009146045,0.0000014191406,0.0005794024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857074,0.00020764655,0.00023566559,0.00026945674,0.0004425367,0.00027393503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985078,0.00069116574,0.00010299659,0.00018819407,0.0004015943,0.000108254884],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060954515,0.00017587547,0.00022506456,0.000054543223,0.0042856517,0.0001250939,0.00046572337,0.00013217427,0.000095864285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005773505,0.00010653945,0.00009053348,0.00016657433,0.012116618,0.00008302176,0.00034440626,0.00044709074,0.00000896439],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041588423,0.000015213528,0.0016271458,0.000006389594,0.00007140609,0.0000036664353,0.0010262566,0.00047843024,8.15071e-7,0.99474645,0.0019260071,0.0000940519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021999991,0.000034645233,0.019962246,0.0006338405,0.00013321356,0.000006675472,0.0048182528,0.000057542322,0.0000588449,0.5787362,0.39485386,0.0004846698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7834645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9640188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93875456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035413535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069978377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99863154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412923836","doi":"10.1017/s0008423925100450","title":"Government Interventions in Constitutional Cases at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Constitutional court; Constitutional right; Public administration; Constitution","score_opus":0.035740524476969265,"score_gpt":0.31046032723759875,"score_spread":0.27471980276062946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412923836","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6688311,0.0012289404,0.00018909105,0.07974484,0.0017520274,0.00016096058,0.00017924813,0.0000018301075,0.24791196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989795,0.00000574729,0.000015413241,0.0005502815,0.000050177412,0.0000010705853,1.01496774e-7,4.0874073e-7,0.00039728807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856776,0.000051781626,0.00027217355,0.00006860096,0.0005833948,0.00045626194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989286,0.00027543976,0.00006514624,0.000049127197,0.00025289427,0.00042880836],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010513138,0.00004176679,0.00010467968,0.000067892426,0.0009458989,0.000026300751,0.0003413495,0.00001718514,0.00019897733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002944814,0.000030505007,0.000057004774,0.00045672499,0.008199687,0.000092693284,0.00003466636,0.00009194365,8.7791824e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000222576,0.0000072357493,0.034555554,0.000002164608,0.0000056826575,0.000032640575,0.000102423925,0.000017039576,0.000010658624,0.96287614,0.0022912656,0.000096944816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026774532,0.00004620624,0.8486297,0.0004383695,0.000034699096,0.000051500676,0.009724571,0.000008843398,0.0003127383,0.06317499,0.07718295,0.00012766363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9680088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99886686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8997012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033779675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030623239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99449944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413019677","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-98615-4_2","title":"Constitutional and Institutional Hierarchy in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Contributions to security and defence studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hierarchy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.020355095743148435,"score_gpt":0.3002001040117816,"score_spread":0.2798450082686332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413019677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021553177,0.086568795,0.00016131983,0.017501362,0.0010762515,0.00093239633,0.003190335,0.000052388885,0.8883618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9655258,0.024854155,0.00004995469,0.0011457655,0.00029025,0.00008743851,0.00003841293,0.0000030131773,0.008005192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984152,0.000046936548,0.00034171916,0.0004225717,0.00041545107,0.0003581749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856436,0.0005302006,0.00007130537,0.00008976219,0.0005663979,0.00017795217],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035106478,0.00025197715,0.00050752447,0.00013172276,0.0022233906,0.00004243461,0.00012556315,0.00014510124,0.00003428974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013638233,0.00025838413,0.000049168866,0.00014685119,0.0047833514,0.00011880477,0.00030634002,0.0003407223,0.000007975889],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016862292,0.000008298068,0.0011496034,0.00002118373,0.00011399759,0.000033741515,0.0009919922,0.0000050959875,2.1296995e-7,0.99274063,0.003199526,0.0017188365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024359953,0.000014277268,0.0010642107,0.0004928736,0.000057123805,0.0000049044547,0.0016317462,0.0000031996947,7.014507e-7,0.34483448,0.6513584,0.00029443897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5151515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9722126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9633705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014467958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062660966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413264830","doi":"10.51244/ijrsi.2025.120700135","title":"Judicial Transparency and The Collegium System: A Critical Legal Analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of research and scientific innovation","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Legitimacy; Political science; Accountability; Judicial independence; Cornerstone; Law; Judicial reform; Democracy; Judicial review; Separation of powers; Supreme court; Public administration; Constitution","score_opus":0.05989682043102251,"score_gpt":0.44159593025394506,"score_spread":0.38169910982292254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413264830","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.688325,0.0033941949,0.015962109,0.16807568,0.009041854,0.00043924068,0.00004417138,0.000024643676,0.114693105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984142,0.00009599142,0.000060790153,0.000065834814,0.00040509837,0.00000496445,0.0000021615415,8.5944174e-7,0.0009500772],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978278,0.0002418223,0.00036920357,0.00012509752,0.0012763161,0.00015971132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943678,0.0005837683,0.00008555066,0.000045825356,0.0048805694,0.000036501748],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007281957,0.00004339733,0.00013976557,0.0012006025,0.0015794388,0.0006788072,0.00027788314,0.000036574387,0.000017435203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020513467,0.000029472883,0.00004725138,0.0031763855,0.0040579434,0.00028153133,0.00005678556,0.0002077223,0.0000011663195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020286723,0.000026328622,0.0024356085,0.0000047471603,0.00022790939,0.000010883836,0.0010084707,0.0000024637757,0.00004841538,0.9927463,0.0020356863,0.0012503276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037806132,0.00016311344,0.0377198,0.00051610445,0.00042809994,0.000042327,0.045609027,0.001169516,0.00015119991,0.65538675,0.25479895,0.00023449419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013337549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010124033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33735955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011012701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006139567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413445748","doi":"10.1016/j.crbeha.2025.100184","title":"The lone dissenter as a non-conformist in the Supreme Court: Extension of past research, cross-cultural analysis and influence model development","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Research in Behavioral Sciences","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conformist; Supreme court; Extension (predicate logic); Law; Sociology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.27258687462626624,"score_gpt":0.5677285883142892,"score_spread":0.29514171368802294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413445748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915839,0.00091116206,0.000007584149,0.0030272626,0.000057105746,0.00041964988,0.0000032725868,0.000004087002,0.003985966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99893403,0.000815492,0.000022312632,0.000009286003,0.000020406998,0.00010866861,0.000001656523,9.24632e-7,0.00008720016],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99619985,0.00045386137,0.00034533118,0.0003354591,0.0019788812,0.0006865968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830526,0.00054249814,0.000047003636,0.00014286366,0.00088978576,0.00007259547],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011217008,0.00009085752,0.00016672096,0.00045422645,0.00379658,0.00054995256,0.00087008945,0.0000437958,0.000005163032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005385178,0.000047816637,0.000046660814,0.004879742,0.01218859,0.00045593028,0.00041597759,0.00046047146,0.000003861766],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045490786,0.0002714259,0.9246713,0.000010251891,0.000009559435,0.0000049193795,0.013431508,0.00023828736,0.00022360036,0.03785792,0.00019092296,0.02304481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016672992,0.000053613632,0.95000964,0.00019606977,0.00000978785,3.0221594e-7,0.030464197,0.00059934205,0.000115733485,0.016424542,0.0018618046,0.00009822639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030675825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05073948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025338348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017844836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089177693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99750036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413493633","doi":"10.64628/aam.td3wpunt7","title":"Doug Ford’s political judicial appointments: Good or bad for justice and democracy?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Democracy; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.043781877180341024,"score_gpt":0.36090714055984024,"score_spread":0.3171252633794992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413493633","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007996651,0.001475314,0.013370921,0.06471105,0.002377069,0.00079197594,0.00008238781,0.00035341684,0.9088412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99091554,0.00015361035,0.0009792318,0.0015579929,0.0016832044,0.000050437156,0.0000032007476,0.000006308868,0.0046504913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990124,0.000027389273,0.00014074768,0.00021273716,0.00021414146,0.0003925562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992505,0.000493294,0.000011388331,0.00003865975,0.00006736069,0.00013883851],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026047693,0.00008774678,0.00012652464,0.000036543333,0.0010255083,0.00011892692,0.000078293066,0.000061256505,0.00021608957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035755296,0.00006312967,0.00005453418,0.00015485882,0.00050902663,0.0001655815,0.000052685846,0.00006025241,0.000058335034],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029646197,0.000022561679,0.00013204334,0.000023856128,0.000040780567,0.0000064759015,0.0004616713,9.084863e-8,0.0000044217963,0.9865139,0.0069213295,0.005843187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023974819,0.00010043591,0.00048936263,0.000041142837,0.00023417777,0.0000039553197,0.005947097,0.000071858594,0.000017352018,0.5682188,0.42448184,0.000154228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031316394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003983527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98291886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007956484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033004754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7887484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413549780","doi":"10.64628/aam.9ar4j9s9e","title":"Trump and Johnson are leading the attack against the rule of law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Rule of law; Political science","score_opus":0.04317283547275014,"score_gpt":0.3025194935973587,"score_spread":0.25934665812460855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413549780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4501718,0.0004250861,0.0000020253071,0.009381873,0.00009256153,0.00008029298,0.0000013902497,0.000008318264,0.53983665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966894,0.00025244843,0.0000057383604,0.0013690399,0.0000841083,0.0000022683735,1.4176487e-7,0.0000010838156,0.0015957879],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959284,0.000038009355,0.000060902847,0.00006200885,0.0001501558,0.000096096264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997265,0.00013983627,0.00003413409,0.000052990446,0.000032692707,0.0000139014155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002468103,0.00003389156,0.0000693941,0.00000491502,0.0006196731,0.000023022489,0.000104931416,0.000018733019,0.00006377586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031965497,0.000015884327,0.000025838184,0.00006688895,0.0006986756,0.00005299595,0.000041788648,0.000041654497,0.000056926703],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002980281,0.0000066806856,0.012107565,0.0000020916218,0.000015211383,1.7055794e-7,0.003996993,0.000008088065,0.00005110106,0.981096,0.0012919481,0.0014211196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014107647,0.000016055914,0.034222692,0.00003430989,0.000014047134,2.8416014e-7,0.02399876,0.000021148184,0.00014929131,0.012065359,0.9292414,0.00009557285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003802257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062529407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9690307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010429303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023201412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413604373","doi":"10.64628/aam.s6fps3sv5","title":"Judicial activism has had vastly different impacts in Brazil and the United States","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Judicial activism; Political economy; Judicial review; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.081282020579179,"score_gpt":0.33928571651459105,"score_spread":0.25800369593541206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413604373","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8913524,0.000625291,0.00016465434,0.08338123,0.0012041556,0.0008289182,0.000051777715,0.00021184048,0.0221797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935123,0.004686206,0.00000735685,0.0007526748,0.0004114289,0.00006724657,0.000042829888,0.000009697385,0.00051028107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982437,0.0003177208,0.0002579145,0.00031978122,0.0004808312,0.00038008182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998805,0.0007749043,0.000111388414,0.00012669564,0.000087795845,0.00009422319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007531701,0.00021279651,0.00040343087,0.00016800131,0.001008727,0.00027455197,0.0002719152,0.00017298943,0.000043266064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004476274,0.00012995888,0.00009596282,0.00034070085,0.0025196124,0.00005562383,0.0007125187,0.00048206397,0.000031405736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039807011,0.00020151073,0.041230023,0.00004922484,0.0005091385,0.000036022397,0.067879856,0.00042326032,0.0000085364145,0.8717759,0.013690929,0.003797529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010693879,0.000022586002,0.21142857,0.00021514755,0.00007394583,3.9158758e-7,0.010939644,0.0002477144,0.000008971228,0.75999373,0.015618529,0.0003813697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36263373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23454803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17019854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014281347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003726976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92836165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413803087","doi":"10.29173/mlj1470","title":"Charter, Constitutionality and the Honour of the Crown: Considering an Additional Constraint","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Charter; Constitution; Law; Constitutionality; Doctrine; Feudalism; Political science; Convention; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.028590209352326052,"score_gpt":0.27753488396197645,"score_spread":0.2489446746096504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413803087","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3412212,0.0025223503,0.00075916474,0.05031089,0.0032903203,0.0007384825,0.0006139216,0.000053501393,0.60049015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99818355,0.00009901883,0.00006624209,0.0012789525,0.0003396784,0.000008180346,0.0000017727731,0.0000011809097,0.000021440363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888647,0.00033963704,0.00022778062,0.000091793234,0.0003027899,0.0001515268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991349,0.00041112132,0.00011935577,0.00006884695,0.00021534161,0.000050424223],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009581397,0.00007213273,0.00013985169,0.000019174919,0.004369739,0.000112257156,0.00019589058,0.000038996826,0.00039215945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033184816,0.00004178154,0.00008614745,0.00010379878,0.008917019,0.00014074889,0.00007440636,0.0002459607,0.000002600431],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028477667,0.00002392792,0.0012445216,0.0000022099039,0.000058020778,0.0000030771214,0.0004235482,0.0000047377284,0.000008762344,0.9945655,0.0012137232,0.0024235162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013015636,0.000014267113,0.032177493,0.00019630163,0.00007943225,0.00016260619,0.04547586,0.000012314467,0.000055935914,0.71835375,0.20203884,0.00013164914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011884247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08712066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65696234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005745872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045831356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413803101","doi":"10.29173/mlj1439","title":"Constitutional Dimensions of the Consultation and Accountability Systems within Canada’s Emergencies Act","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Principle of legality; Political science; Commission; Legitimacy; Duty; Constitutionalism; Compliance (psychology); Public administration; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Democracy; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.022387519879420007,"score_gpt":0.26997484267373284,"score_spread":0.24758732279431284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413803101","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.910797,0.0018800093,0.00007678576,0.0046280148,0.0045929765,0.00028467545,0.000042977837,0.000011804346,0.07768576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99955267,0.00010101638,0.000012720776,0.00018935376,0.00010627355,0.0000032478054,4.4331992e-7,6.483244e-7,0.000033617755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990796,0.00011664055,0.00024116975,0.00007550814,0.0003695912,0.00011753325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992552,0.00015565734,0.00012361728,0.000049851024,0.00037368972,0.000042025975],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047276137,0.00005832743,0.0001113468,0.000012700899,0.0028364933,0.000048737704,0.000116796014,0.0000319568,0.000012796976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032125405,0.00003575694,0.000031048785,0.00014824659,0.0022453833,0.00009861468,0.000047995443,0.00012810246,5.348995e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007859586,0.000013229082,0.040673487,0.0000055140868,0.00004353866,0.0000010145574,0.0005148767,0.000095723364,0.000042574095,0.9572469,0.0011674188,0.00018787874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008511177,0.000026762971,0.20029147,0.00043217998,0.00022909894,0.00005513994,0.34307885,0.00007560458,0.0002625114,0.080971345,0.37339598,0.00032993723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95001173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99619925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87627554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002110848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018485705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99846166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413858327","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5401005","title":"Indigenous Justice in Bolivia and the Limits of Plurinational Constitutionalism","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Indigenous; Economic Justice; Political science; Geography; Law; Democracy; Ecology; Politics; Biology","score_opus":0.018933627731899765,"score_gpt":0.3085911406971502,"score_spread":0.28965751296525044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413858327","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32925743,0.27281567,0.005804461,0.049973782,0.00552439,0.0024761895,0.00021909295,0.00007497117,0.33385402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9411561,0.057453167,0.000026795085,0.00015872139,0.0004906201,0.000020454392,0.0000038504836,0.0000023729497,0.0006879293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977154,0.00032349306,0.0003734323,0.00017750595,0.0005143848,0.0008957882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886835,0.00045958135,0.00026453048,0.000072728035,0.00029585641,0.000038982947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035301787,0.00013769846,0.00030799725,0.00016200876,0.0010129557,0.000051030893,0.00037228136,0.00016682466,0.0000104958235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066370046,0.00010532092,0.00011086554,0.00020892272,0.0019239358,0.00006966905,0.00018137183,0.0020178044,0.0000017629831],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006471983,0.00004133525,0.001367612,0.000017674032,0.00016059575,0.0000018732608,0.0036866094,0.00021563986,3.858915e-7,0.9920527,0.000028512624,0.0023623714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070446765,0.000014580945,0.0027114125,0.00016916502,0.00013447597,0.000021156042,0.0046616057,0.000010428256,9.89853e-7,0.98750025,0.0039611203,0.00011032749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010007534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03805249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61189866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008397781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01941577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414018354","doi":"10.1017/s0008423925100383","title":"Negative Spotlight: Event-Driven Effects on Support for the Canadian Supreme Court","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Acadia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Event (particle physics); Law; Law and economics; Economics; Physics","score_opus":0.021646520328811814,"score_gpt":0.31843019265364597,"score_spread":0.29678367232483416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414018354","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12387254,0.00043599095,0.0010297532,0.4532458,0.0088815885,0.0014926046,0.00018751046,0.000021202253,0.41083303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940998,0.000004376355,0.000059903516,0.0049618306,0.0004406481,0.0000069789116,2.1861845e-7,0.0000023164425,0.0004239394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980704,0.000060234546,0.00019979876,0.00013800047,0.0004382058,0.0010933651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99672276,0.0007848519,0.000055140958,0.000084890205,0.00060371135,0.0017486443],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013115165,0.00008608337,0.00014929277,0.00028158972,0.0038771532,0.00018759553,0.00068235287,0.00005402754,0.000070695336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004149987,0.00005965966,0.00009858726,0.00063110556,0.0033433912,0.00016669046,0.000013553977,0.00018316397,0.000018433384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003944713,0.000003735643,0.0038536403,0.0000018748633,0.000015435147,0.000021907781,0.0005450058,0.000009883162,0.000006752163,0.9901074,0.004625806,0.0008046221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004358371,0.00028061797,0.46726695,0.00018939214,0.000095820666,0.00001093191,0.003875528,0.000053557233,0.00059603015,0.23148476,0.29546756,0.00024303584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8778353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.988371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8702273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020584825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033101697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99936897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414126951","doi":"10.55843/isc2024conf56w","title":"DETECTING HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS THROUGH AI AND THE ROLE OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Adjudication; Fundamental rights; Transparency (behavior); Transformative learning; Corporate governance; Legal certainty; Liability; Safeguarding","score_opus":0.01882979263477651,"score_gpt":0.31504092120719956,"score_spread":0.29621112857242304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414126951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044872418,0.0034033204,0.002851434,0.0037754565,0.00023234593,0.00016718365,0.000008353122,0.00007709447,0.9446124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994647,0.000028063932,0.000056924568,0.000083094055,0.00018147101,0.000007793481,6.7871474e-7,7.6174797e-7,0.00017653158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995087,0.000044393473,0.00010491307,0.00008482936,0.0001706328,0.000086530876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996599,0.00021925579,0.000016899952,0.000028882283,0.000058611102,0.000016465892],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002525506,0.00004054031,0.00007266724,0.0000159731,0.0019454353,0.000047228088,0.00004935505,0.000025615771,0.00012774176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004076565,0.00002411565,0.00003666893,0.00010717175,0.003619711,0.00013528194,0.000027263965,0.00006338253,0.000009358316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021966873,0.0000047177036,0.0006093339,0.000001093383,0.000025728063,4.771026e-7,0.002708005,0.0000026582527,0.000043997345,0.99604017,0.00009080634,0.00047083874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008349774,0.0000038571657,0.00029691958,0.000022180358,0.00002005797,0.0000012711114,0.0013676921,0.00007306314,0.0001121671,0.87819946,0.11978153,0.000038287246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015422245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071377424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9545923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018083421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009324185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414143493","doi":"10.47577/tssj.v75i1.13153","title":"Doctrinal Legal Research in Common Law: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Technium Social Sciences Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Empirical legal studies; Relevance (law); Interpretation (philosophy); Legal research; Foundation (evidence); Empirical research; Strengths and weaknesses; Legal realism; Legal doctrine","score_opus":0.08203748198966203,"score_gpt":0.438017178647538,"score_spread":0.35597969665787593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414143493","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04667633,0.0023866752,0.000024517643,0.29167947,0.0004665987,0.00038368555,0.0000015297239,0.000024447123,0.6583567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99673253,0.00068428105,0.0000137329525,0.0014527035,0.00071071065,0.000029914436,4.7733913e-8,0.0000012826517,0.00037477235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99668056,0.0012021069,0.00025407906,0.00016135775,0.0011708717,0.0005310494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847656,0.0011762124,0.000085896696,0.00007744326,0.0001487779,0.000035123965],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.016811803,0.00008530767,0.00016142681,0.00009473444,0.021755328,0.0007733139,0.0012311442,0.000072762465,0.000019889178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019362751,0.000037293015,0.00008228436,0.0019112763,0.022284513,0.0002499171,0.0003062188,0.0010062444,0.0000053915232],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030144136,0.000014930692,0.0025713013,6.057927e-7,0.0000084542135,0.0000035187888,0.0030456593,0.000001638094,0.000006077094,0.9864562,0.0028105436,0.0050508897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003039422,0.00002757811,0.010197034,0.000028227258,0.000011748937,0.000010824979,0.024103463,0.000008383422,0.000006657504,0.7181992,0.24703917,0.000063766674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030463485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042899217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9500562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016088986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069771626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98037624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414560045","doi":"10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i05.56517","title":"Right to Die in Constitutional Jurisprudence: An Indian Perspective with Comparative Dimensions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Right to die; Dignity; Perspective (graphical); Human rights; Slippery slope; Death with dignity","score_opus":0.1268754531048172,"score_gpt":0.5317548468186317,"score_spread":0.40487939371381454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414560045","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8419119,0.00062732556,0.0024292017,0.060297128,0.0020651952,0.0015128846,0.00015440222,0.000039637096,0.090962306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970409,0.000119037664,0.000979852,0.00012585837,0.00051494275,0.00014257009,0.000009771322,0.0000036506674,0.0010633763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973878,0.00030480552,0.00027153312,0.00032538272,0.001245621,0.00046481538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958171,0.00069627835,0.000053444466,0.000084365645,0.003112003,0.00023676202],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017465361,0.00011959696,0.00019037421,0.000842274,0.0027867423,0.00020159128,0.0006525572,0.000071303286,0.000061479535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050539756,0.000095877534,0.0000685287,0.00063205464,0.0022393202,0.00047863065,0.00022595494,0.0005291033,0.000025497651],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010438294,0.0004803936,0.023754343,0.0000019065128,0.00015903174,0.00022779341,0.022532484,0.0005716367,0.00013683223,0.94916826,0.0016041149,0.0003193894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032296616,0.0009123269,0.11311152,0.0008999617,0.000025944853,0.00005946258,0.19475867,0.00028563768,0.0003415609,0.58536536,0.100481145,0.0005287776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037751833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037837937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3638029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013394017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023107808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414833931","doi":"10.29173/alr2850","title":"Rules, Principles, and the Reformation of Judicial Review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Legitimacy; Judicial review; Judicial opinion; Normative; Dismissal; Administrative law; Realm","score_opus":0.025367818833001304,"score_gpt":0.3117849208431361,"score_spread":0.28641710201013476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414833931","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004050753,0.5030289,0.0000037070947,0.03193093,0.00006500339,0.00042477588,0.0000013690336,0.0000045134916,0.46450025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.037197042,0.9470011,0.000018299255,0.015062678,0.00004991258,0.000053443153,0.000004347017,0.0000013672576,0.000611808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990796,0.00021318566,0.00033343022,0.00009010294,0.0001793816,0.00010431422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934053,0.00028883232,0.00013135484,0.00011757519,0.000099908364,0.00002177286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011241122,0.000064498425,0.00033494056,0.000008194555,0.00046732693,0.000009333227,0.00015279002,0.000024081592,0.00005510872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00083315227,0.00003763104,0.00007935411,0.00023096208,0.0009544453,0.00008579774,0.00007216921,0.000057088702,0.000024472318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002923626,0.0000058075298,0.000047224697,0.0013330189,0.000021934984,6.7137904e-8,0.000088827706,1.3204439e-8,7.5319e-8,0.9853115,0.0034283611,0.009760238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000107249434,0.0000029531045,0.00017278233,0.013278349,0.00015378074,4.1121072e-7,0.000018805855,3.5153442e-7,6.7081766e-7,0.019341903,0.9668813,0.00004146861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048844956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024664005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9659696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024116214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011953477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9931333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414833959","doi":"10.29173/alr2855","title":"Deference and the Administrative-Legislative Paradox in Judicial Review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Jurisprudence; Judicial review; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Standard of review; Administrative law; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.04361788546437659,"score_gpt":0.36981678171471516,"score_spread":0.3261988962503386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414833959","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000409106,0.43798366,0.0000031972447,0.05173449,0.0000607773,0.0005603707,0.0000011582889,0.0000043366563,0.50961107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26282236,0.7157718,0.000009142763,0.020531528,0.000039624116,0.0001356718,0.0000013464202,0.0000014163227,0.000687142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869055,0.00047537443,0.00029807346,0.00018732413,0.0001721614,0.00017653611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865025,0.0010566858,0.00008204155,0.00011006865,0.00006657137,0.00003440641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009250824,0.000104177845,0.00044047539,0.000010420723,0.000518519,0.000021978363,0.00019156857,0.000030664964,0.00009863238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013574095,0.00006498366,0.00007608203,0.00045810573,0.0016660927,0.0000925345,0.000065436005,0.00012430127,0.000034195953],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006112893,0.00001062759,0.00036362972,0.00033331595,0.000018747383,0.0000010273912,0.0004101387,8.1204075e-9,2.9318043e-8,0.99026304,0.0021502955,0.006442994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001798081,0.000006983432,0.00062642404,0.015131945,0.00010203426,6.165924e-7,0.000074658186,2.3404124e-7,2.3747795e-7,0.06198136,0.92181426,0.00008144731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060344703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20363149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9282817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003010436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024827023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94591254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414833984","doi":"10.29173/alr2854","title":"Process, Substance, and Judicial Review's (A)symmetry","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Alberta","keywords":"Judicial review; Administrative law; Subject (documents); Substantive law; Legislature; Public law; Common law; Compliance (psychology); Citizenship","score_opus":0.017310051391140873,"score_gpt":0.33159391454085657,"score_spread":0.3142838631497157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414833984","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012321521,0.50858974,0.0000019468564,0.021575306,0.00013083713,0.00032914671,0.0000012406148,0.000014115464,0.46923447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08428684,0.8768283,0.0000116591345,0.037356228,0.00012452589,0.00007677412,0.0000034593756,0.0000033434521,0.0013088427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893785,0.00010582974,0.00027071443,0.00022875064,0.00023185545,0.00022497732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994061,0.00020229604,0.00007580345,0.00011605321,0.00013564544,0.000064131804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004796228,0.000114732786,0.00040171336,0.00001568043,0.00071831985,0.000018526254,0.00017363294,0.000042494292,0.00015965963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005627616,0.000095382056,0.00007665722,0.0006350776,0.0006451064,0.00013432316,0.000033341206,0.00009413832,0.00007087607],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014028698,0.000014556334,0.00080516725,0.0018192602,0.000025567326,0.0000010344979,0.00006408567,3.6891168e-9,2.1685356e-7,0.96458864,0.024399303,0.008280747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005531099,0.000004823236,0.00027276477,0.017134162,0.00014693379,6.533661e-7,0.000029177609,4.3767237e-8,0.000001479496,0.030451367,0.95179623,0.000107069536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017659428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05408986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9341373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031549975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018180608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98888206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414957217","doi":"10.21991/cf29493","title":"Editors’ Introduction: Responsive Judicial Review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Constitutional review; Legislation; Constitution; Judicial opinion; Public policy","score_opus":0.016730526873929313,"score_gpt":0.3061496900456219,"score_spread":0.2894191631716926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414957217","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010441439,0.029086975,0.02361148,0.31189716,0.029818613,0.0014197738,0.00018970064,0.0004941999,0.6033777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9361894,0.01175201,0.0008112137,0.026124826,0.01885129,0.0005428317,0.00023682824,0.000016313385,0.005475298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99597883,0.00029852806,0.00086847885,0.00080139923,0.0010224729,0.0010302888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973202,0.00040620158,0.0002386463,0.00042078987,0.0013317823,0.00028238437],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011111347,0.000420234,0.0006361615,0.0004079907,0.0063315504,0.00013004061,0.0005969959,0.00029879157,0.0010330328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004153892,0.00042996823,0.00039083118,0.0016782328,0.016884305,0.0008112018,0.0002837668,0.00048473635,0.0006361368],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057314384,0.000075200864,0.0011969547,0.000034620178,0.00010663277,0.0000135573355,0.000037395093,0.000023787474,0.000018234543,0.6185667,0.3787724,0.0010971931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005553645,0.000025428832,0.00023956413,0.0009435557,0.00015727752,0.000029079576,0.0014852027,0.000004998734,0.000042598913,0.13483286,0.86128706,0.00039702782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010555752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011150774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.936085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076786237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073778713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414957225","doi":"10.21991/cf29499","title":"Responsive Judicial Review in Canada: Reflections on the Notwithstanding Clause and Beyond","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Scope (computer science); Constitutional review; Judicial opinion; Judicial activism; Constitutional law; Constitution","score_opus":0.03875688112898575,"score_gpt":0.32320262861898413,"score_spread":0.2844457474899984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414957225","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004588868,0.01639655,0.0025928037,0.26229754,0.0028988225,0.0016013182,0.00024864342,0.00009609791,0.70927936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9680792,0.005553032,0.000061675666,0.025714822,0.00011766286,0.00016215743,0.000014704492,0.000004185337,0.0002925297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730223,0.00027927788,0.0005746003,0.00048002234,0.0006624166,0.0007014709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99799883,0.0011309506,0.00014094215,0.00023260666,0.00034667875,0.00015000052],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088767544,0.00027866257,0.00040518097,0.0002612584,0.0048325513,0.00007623296,0.00032264864,0.000119166565,0.00014219101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002834333,0.00022833401,0.00010759341,0.0012644242,0.0071206433,0.0002822678,0.00016565017,0.0004736618,0.000029236711],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071678274,0.00003697386,0.009284742,0.000018849016,0.000062791594,0.000026075451,0.000111131936,0.00005251149,0.000011674456,0.9635498,0.026175762,0.0005980347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008802726,0.00003776296,0.0044777673,0.0026679507,0.00012263985,0.000031578238,0.016064221,0.000027138918,0.000033387474,0.2057273,0.7694052,0.00052480405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4059119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9268923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96349037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019549606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017077768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414957232","doi":"10.21991/cf29494","title":"Living Dead Constitutionalism or Why Old Constitutional Worlds Are Never Lost for Good: A Comment on Rosalind Dixon’s Responsive Judicial Review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Charter; Constitutional theory; Normative; Section (typography); Articulation (sociology); Judicial review; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.03886540404702162,"score_gpt":0.327677094621816,"score_spread":0.2888116905747944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414957232","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029035565,0.019351125,0.15545575,0.3799021,0.012458731,0.008053837,0.0058863256,0.0008242889,0.41777748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75399894,0.0051399223,0.001781443,0.22966792,0.0017987634,0.0018505227,0.00056072907,0.000035030644,0.005166721],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919096,0.0006236459,0.0019066391,0.0016659225,0.0017404886,0.0021536949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912696,0.004077486,0.00081890187,0.0007625771,0.0024014444,0.00066997524],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023961703,0.0011173247,0.0016455284,0.00087666046,0.010213001,0.00036600675,0.0011949136,0.00067098247,0.0012917947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008129405,0.0010493556,0.00095801597,0.0019511987,0.035866316,0.0013718044,0.00056526094,0.0009150458,0.0005270557],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00075583934,0.00053159666,0.0048209256,0.00018262464,0.00048361323,0.000064751526,0.00007452456,0.0002855242,0.000013765355,0.73772424,0.25458875,0.00047384517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002651964,0.00014210325,0.0006065549,0.009432981,0.0005031364,0.00008710507,0.001970083,0.000050604704,0.000040394683,0.090434164,0.8929126,0.0011683105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014054987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004205278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7537086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021817724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014233886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414985682","doi":"10.21128/1812-7126-2025-3-26-49","title":"Constitutional review bodies’ orders to enact legislation: an introduction to the issue","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sravnitel noe konstitucionnoe obozrenie","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Jurisprudence; Constitution; Constitutional court; Legislation; Legislature; Legal research; Constitutional law; Economic Justice; Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.0244080267970746,"score_gpt":0.33267507361578275,"score_spread":0.30826704681870815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414985682","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00078083214,0.007760278,0.014844735,0.66193384,0.0068686153,0.002325823,0.000087934415,0.00033848247,0.30505946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8976417,0.0049609016,0.0031014932,0.070220955,0.013747927,0.00078626536,0.00019634112,0.000020021596,0.00932438],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997386,0.00029749898,0.00046930774,0.00061304856,0.00070651714,0.0005276229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983444,0.00017498204,0.00009431309,0.000460522,0.0006597644,0.0002659944],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013021717,0.00026634676,0.00035044848,0.0001848594,0.0033069197,0.00015083351,0.0005922907,0.000107738604,0.00080941245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019342749,0.00021594104,0.00012556567,0.0016193012,0.0016401206,0.00043711512,0.00017247579,0.0002597675,0.0011190996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025674586,0.00006229638,0.00036738897,0.000021180886,0.00004969219,0.0000030836866,0.0010278232,0.00035715473,0.000015156376,0.73325396,0.24653067,0.018285912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015512128,0.000038129503,0.0007072441,0.00029370195,0.0000844146,0.0000043385808,0.0011978147,0.0000052176943,0.000015094524,0.004840805,0.99239004,0.0002680781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00237438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014583732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8968609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030637113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010561803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415184943","doi":"","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada and non-national sources : empirical study of openness to the world and national withdrawal in the interpretation of fundamental rights","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"theses.fr (ABES)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Supreme court; Empirical research; Interpretation (philosophy); Statutory interpretation","score_opus":0.033366858977494286,"score_gpt":0.3220434229516495,"score_spread":0.2886765639741552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415184943","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9686877,0.00039561058,0.0000035522214,0.013006692,0.00024498632,0.0005013702,0.00007993234,0.000002786198,0.017077377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994672,0.000042363317,0.0000039722513,0.00016201974,0.00011064213,0.000037337904,0.0000024843825,0.0000030321087,0.00017096993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978129,0.0003333199,0.00034814587,0.00015760625,0.0011602095,0.00018777566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99767244,0.0018060206,0.00014903823,0.000068843794,0.00026646236,0.000037219943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016680036,0.00010740319,0.00020291598,0.0000662497,0.00070765044,0.00003704618,0.00032233735,0.000026645921,0.000022201193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021991522,0.000058068053,0.00002893883,0.0007777719,0.0012292681,0.00010521702,0.00016136195,0.00011064406,0.0000016542418],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002625015,0.000531041,0.34196422,0.000034422883,0.00035417746,0.0000047388876,0.29901874,0.0019704285,0.000029737113,0.3508235,0.003412783,0.0015937209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047692223,0.00017653273,0.7547152,0.00012878477,0.0000494585,0.0000021483415,0.20972154,0.0010473679,0.000028175633,0.021674732,0.011852793,0.00012632327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.62304455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97508997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41275102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011518454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050185056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5442747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415223234","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i2.1874","title":"Contributions civilistes à l’interprétation des lois constitutionnelles canadiennes","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Teleology; Constitution; Argument (complex analysis); Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional law; Code (set theory); Relevance (law); Civil code","score_opus":0.01602313191760216,"score_gpt":0.29804034634127163,"score_spread":0.28201721442366945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415223234","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009206583,0.0011262494,0.0018745107,0.005557565,0.0010593872,0.00011077863,0.00010014115,0.000052132822,0.9809126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99835205,0.0004488422,0.00012463114,0.0004646706,0.00019528148,0.000008150652,0.0000030035287,0.0000019243514,0.00040146665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907726,0.00010237107,0.00022149918,0.00011139048,0.00018382381,0.00030364314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902534,0.00016530471,0.00007015192,0.000047529895,0.0005299744,0.00016168543],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043510812,0.00008504784,0.00013392526,0.00007434147,0.016230237,0.0000944343,0.00014503837,0.000055778266,0.00016394258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009128579,0.000076669865,0.00008998308,0.00026835423,0.0018568035,0.00025555785,0.000031068048,0.00014292839,0.000026097721],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009095529,0.000027056976,0.0010787142,0.0000022470679,0.000057911373,0.000010135748,0.00053890835,0.0000250703,0.000017302154,0.9948736,0.0009380401,0.0024219276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022535745,0.000013156964,0.0009419749,0.00010934717,0.000041854215,0.000015323636,0.0059735975,0.00000554856,0.0001122147,0.2045906,0.7878769,0.0000941043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.121126264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.76235425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98914546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067850255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018389583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9850505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415244252","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.4105","title":"Racial Profiling and the Rule of Law: A Reply","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Statutory law; Profiling (computer programming); Racial profiling; Democracy; Race (biology)","score_opus":0.01917494328138697,"score_gpt":0.3000780945790827,"score_spread":0.2809031512976957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415244252","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004843872,0.0020505416,0.00012705191,0.010600376,0.00031737232,0.000095229436,0.0000023657688,0.000009976799,0.9819532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976572,0.00033494816,0.00023420957,0.0012086331,0.00029504832,0.0000039071633,1.7257297e-7,0.0000015099436,0.00026438272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923724,0.00012895161,0.00018676143,0.00007573082,0.00022719392,0.00014414206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995435,0.0001511806,0.000090517016,0.000047188176,0.00013077227,0.00003684029],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094829866,0.00005138611,0.00014139751,0.000016238966,0.0021456913,0.00007198755,0.00013322642,0.000030984145,0.000022077129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016871298,0.000033156946,0.000066333225,0.000085583364,0.0016685566,0.000100743106,0.000054343393,0.00015436587,0.0000024170247],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006058888,0.000013960544,0.0004329306,0.0000027909432,0.00004151906,0.0000026967464,0.0018921911,0.00000211763,0.000030800893,0.9961931,0.00007889341,0.0012483934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060937094,0.000012801152,0.00029809115,0.000056662862,0.000041005187,0.0000058931664,0.0017753636,0.0000047026538,0.0001735156,0.9486264,0.048347015,0.00004918596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09161495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07843381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9928133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025201181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013626793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415507993","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2025.10057","title":"Underuse of the Override","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Presumption; Comity; Charter; Supreme court; Judicial review; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Legislative history","score_opus":0.021674066433417596,"score_gpt":0.30086886121503714,"score_spread":0.27919479478161957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415507993","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25748584,0.0066248775,0.00023476098,0.028399376,0.0028870273,0.00015178982,0.000019374665,0.0000056266317,0.7041913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982304,0.000106334315,0.000030242121,0.0011020815,0.0001145214,4.7452568e-7,2.8679949e-8,0.0000012770683,0.00041465007],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992779,0.00006974639,0.00020494053,0.00005049167,0.00022633716,0.00017057204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993122,0.00009620332,0.00012853331,0.0000781749,0.0002403155,0.00014455621],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035793043,0.000046132212,0.00011751518,0.000048340316,0.0007039321,0.000029427985,0.00043326514,0.00003816232,0.000054575696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003185685,0.000033716045,0.000093232986,0.000282493,0.0012869823,0.00011172492,0.000017806906,0.00012533057,0.0000029409894],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000266655,0.000004033837,0.014954587,0.000002426691,0.000023103255,0.000009505881,0.0009218897,0.00001914992,0.00002296116,0.9813866,0.0023055081,0.0003475711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016419186,0.000021593953,0.06325007,0.00039498962,0.000055837947,0.000006065462,0.001819928,7.892585e-7,0.0004016487,0.22142072,0.7123733,0.00009084846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23199241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7048838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7599659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016686034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042763515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77312183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416019422","doi":"10.21991/cf29503","title":"The Constitutional Status of Overbreadth: A Reply to Professor Stewart","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Norm (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Supreme court; Constitutional law; Charter","score_opus":0.02341658620626918,"score_gpt":0.3074552228880814,"score_spread":0.28403863668181223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416019422","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037447205,0.033008352,0.074945726,0.14317417,0.02751134,0.006610512,0.0044161016,0.00041937619,0.7061697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97894555,0.0049117026,0.00067287165,0.00861325,0.00061655894,0.0006434384,0.00012381675,0.000019013045,0.005453821],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98794097,0.0006509191,0.0031415964,0.0017793416,0.0026786847,0.0038085177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99055094,0.0025836832,0.0010475935,0.0012193199,0.0034410767,0.0011573748],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021701239,0.0012359713,0.0015585289,0.0006914957,0.016944183,0.0005185055,0.0018719924,0.00067232444,0.0005010868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069046477,0.0010712802,0.0011048823,0.0040525477,0.100406684,0.0011376172,0.0014996672,0.0011054033,0.0006562585],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000841276,0.0005827976,0.022984494,0.000089150344,0.0011255932,0.000026574666,0.00046630466,0.00070578244,0.00014147241,0.8937898,0.07584587,0.0034008531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021436033,0.00018972221,0.0019955318,0.0015982478,0.0004426803,0.00004476779,0.014211387,0.00008374701,0.00031871055,0.14232144,0.83564025,0.0010098845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044631297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004719484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97520083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002141259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034531992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99917376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416107846","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjaf067","title":"<i>Constraining the Court: Judicial Power and Policy Implementation in the Charter Era</i> , by James B. Kelly","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Power (physics); Judicial review; Judicial activism","score_opus":0.012898358641686102,"score_gpt":0.3258684917914153,"score_spread":0.3129701331497292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416107846","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28403246,0.002689459,0.00008648955,0.64634746,0.0005013751,0.00025739372,0.000013366309,0.0000070622164,0.066064924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820512,0.0008170101,0.000005867149,0.016583435,0.00046088616,0.0000052018286,7.0011674e-7,0.0000021534304,0.000073570285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985652,0.00042213046,0.00030257303,0.000063614345,0.0004114013,0.00023507662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991139,0.00045604017,0.00018785591,0.00005997291,0.00015070214,0.00003148454],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002494282,0.00008352843,0.00013203318,0.000080821446,0.0017071791,0.00034713448,0.0003577029,0.000032912867,0.000026365586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002128382,0.000040017276,0.00005810185,0.00035041364,0.00066207704,0.00027469135,0.00004529877,0.0002842795,0.000001218921],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006344862,0.000063609514,0.010144186,0.0000026231685,0.00015173566,0.000006091786,0.09661011,0.0000030588014,0.000113712034,0.6077546,0.25224453,0.032842327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009891788,0.000079029305,0.082839444,0.0000579747,0.0000861556,0.00004123758,0.18267536,0.0000028492593,0.000027527574,0.10837615,0.6246778,0.00014732016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010302879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00393829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6980187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006040911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047600377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416124163","doi":"","title":"The comportemental Behavior of the constitutional judges","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"theses.fr (ABES)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Tribunal; Compatibilism","score_opus":0.045883791261855086,"score_gpt":0.32003294008185423,"score_spread":0.27414914881999913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416124163","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15247755,0.07742521,0.000043497228,0.03655036,0.011834475,0.0007088521,0.00040012875,0.000083430205,0.7204765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949313,0.002154006,0.000012870221,0.00021924685,0.0008384211,0.000049721195,0.000003926989,0.000006486323,0.001784013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980461,0.00021447641,0.00036445353,0.0002331225,0.0007619049,0.0003799613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894655,0.00058056077,0.000098664736,0.00018774778,0.000115530296,0.00007092465],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006866802,0.00017821591,0.0002041351,0.000023989682,0.00200717,0.000111838766,0.0005202851,0.00009464838,0.0007878831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011467517,0.00010263048,0.0002702186,0.00047289973,0.016228376,0.00017227799,0.00024892885,0.00025921312,0.00034024028],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050008775,0.000115964795,0.011562695,0.00001609199,0.00015200852,0.0000117431255,0.0024811793,0.000006130172,0.00010068502,0.97431576,0.0024532673,0.008779446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012068453,0.000028252236,0.013520299,0.00027002284,0.00027732682,0.000015621177,0.013807312,0.000019170506,0.00026738094,0.045409877,0.92608887,0.00017515977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009494852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034540363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9289059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020056908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064488925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416290320","doi":"10.29173/alr2828","title":"Constitutionalizing Criminal Law, Colton Fehr (Vancouver: UBC Press, 2022)","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Criminal law; Criminal liability","score_opus":0.03227752894328427,"score_gpt":0.3186891351445758,"score_spread":0.2864116062012915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416290320","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000021323747,0.40007442,0.000031021467,0.0062715663,0.0028386526,0.0008927414,0.000030905518,0.00002777019,0.58981156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27512428,0.66189,0.00007037667,0.04118173,0.000823798,0.0003263781,0.00003104876,0.000018647395,0.020533765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956605,0.0005254811,0.0011489904,0.00087234954,0.0009259736,0.0008667176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973613,0.0010543482,0.0003834516,0.00044315943,0.0005204347,0.00023729897],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009806969,0.0005353537,0.0012045011,0.000036576424,0.004068494,0.00018490735,0.00077428255,0.00024400394,0.0017354224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007584232,0.0005094177,0.00055978616,0.0008815337,0.005979552,0.00056636997,0.0004533525,0.0004340704,0.00045360922],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019584411,0.00015638048,0.0000758601,0.0018795005,0.00029431924,0.000012393004,0.00021524276,0.0000018640236,0.0000024738504,0.8679182,0.12633786,0.003086298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032322702,0.00003499353,0.000026336184,0.014144265,0.0014563327,0.0000041044514,0.00023688978,0.0000032194107,0.000019281144,0.025442356,0.9578053,0.0005037037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3581851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47565117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8424759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037580932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014157532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416349722","doi":"10.3138/9781487568627-011","title":"9 Executive Legal Officer at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Officer; Supreme court; Chief executive officer; Liability; Legislation","score_opus":0.018459564603820568,"score_gpt":0.21261685683881767,"score_spread":0.19415729223499711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416349722","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016345542,0.005020504,0.00001567792,0.00041988728,0.0006706902,0.00050703296,0.00075016107,0.000010618194,0.99244195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0913601,0.001857742,0.000014493005,0.00006468228,0.00010489214,3.7281197e-7,0.000006430992,0.000006286729,0.906585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978471,0.00010873818,0.00031678085,0.0004034841,0.00096564164,0.0003582521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802893,0.0003109102,0.0005331708,0.00031122327,0.0006926866,0.00012305068],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022273965,0.00031956428,0.00064312556,0.00001517552,0.0018701736,0.000012346822,0.00090203277,0.0002521197,0.0012225354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003320382,0.00030882686,0.0003221665,0.000003830969,0.0039200466,0.000109675166,0.0009154173,0.0002083964,0.0000014602534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036982974,0.000021869255,0.000027699427,0.0000482698,0.00094393006,0.000025793168,0.009757328,0.00001503455,0.000016759286,0.94678336,0.040343612,0.0016465258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031840653,0.000047642676,0.00020021148,0.00026643806,0.0004927063,5.748595e-7,0.0037319437,0.0000053817575,0.000089380665,0.0005922842,0.99397963,0.0002754096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.998815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99911803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.953636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015146979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032016682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416826384","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.70007","title":"<i>Allan C. Hutchinson</i> , Rethinking Legitimacy: Courts, Constitutions and Politics, Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2025, 192 pp, hb, £90.00","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Judicial restraint; Politics; Dissenting opinion; Judicial review; Constitutional law; Judicial independence; Nothing; Majority opinion","score_opus":0.04213518038715577,"score_gpt":0.32086423742568954,"score_spread":0.2787290570385338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416826384","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025750956,0.27083203,0.0010431065,0.06121726,0.0006390885,0.0006483772,0.00007805758,0.00016690983,0.6651177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6204514,0.3318843,0.00063163106,0.042841606,0.0007642077,0.00013237055,0.00005993835,0.000016155875,0.0032183744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979439,0.00021022982,0.00043989482,0.00041401674,0.00048176292,0.00051023776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989738,0.00019040582,0.00012697665,0.0002435652,0.00029002337,0.00017521519],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001035918,0.0002187821,0.0005077352,0.000042569434,0.0028353552,0.0005314599,0.00037679155,0.00012797334,0.00013078819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000674639,0.00020176882,0.00014745031,0.00029363664,0.0020019698,0.00073188863,0.00022695662,0.0003442862,0.000027951026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016171728,0.000035796667,0.0005570291,0.00024271039,0.00005873544,0.0000073338683,0.0004715043,0.000001048335,0.0000013303187,0.9502705,0.04456126,0.0037911765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012390217,0.0000058477676,0.00005181395,0.0018364764,0.00009577643,0.0000029281491,0.000053564283,0.000013304036,0.000001490155,0.29631537,0.70134616,0.00015333339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019683605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010387229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66189927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016675518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008003665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416871886","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5818842","title":"Athens v Ontario: What Can The First Democracy Teach Us About Judicial Review?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Legislation; Ultra vires; Judicial review; Constitutional review; Constitution; Supreme court; Ethos; Legislature","score_opus":0.010236362734791291,"score_gpt":0.2756719854647431,"score_spread":0.2654356227299518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416871886","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11825914,0.38842693,0.0004751259,0.34923276,0.003533379,0.00092858693,0.000004075912,0.00009880738,0.13904122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7241926,0.26383278,0.000004642907,0.0063324682,0.00072399137,0.000014442944,0.0000011274549,0.000005164293,0.004892787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99719745,0.00016285338,0.0003070385,0.00018496545,0.00047353265,0.0016741693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936396,0.000120855104,0.00014133487,0.00012661295,0.00018232236,0.00006492977],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025090969,0.00014699441,0.00024287598,0.000051174473,0.004982701,0.00019175491,0.000537303,0.00006795706,0.00010877374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026487873,0.000101619014,0.00019563001,0.0003803489,0.00051885966,0.0002666508,0.00007445404,0.0015807977,0.000033876568],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001712943,0.000043295295,0.019846944,0.000006522733,0.00022734643,0.0000037174025,0.0036896458,0.0000029455716,9.75059e-7,0.949545,0.004354561,0.022261882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015424166,0.000032130185,0.010454718,0.00042938776,0.000114660725,0.000018998178,0.0049853376,3.888328e-7,5.4292684e-7,0.4295902,0.5541072,0.000112231115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16351818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94926786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7857497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026342485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011050356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417004399","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5854163","title":"Timely Trials, Costly Remedies: Remedial Deterrence after Jordan (2026) 49:1 Dal LJ (forthcoming)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Remedial education; Supreme court; Enforcement; Deterrence theory; Economic Justice; Meaning (existential); Forcing (mathematics); Interpretation (philosophy)","score_opus":0.04059461532254703,"score_gpt":0.3390233181412633,"score_spread":0.29842870281871625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417004399","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25901294,0.29673815,0.016618174,0.05956424,0.0668604,0.0069444124,0.00053168135,0.0010459839,0.29268405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88286364,0.102759436,0.00017610971,0.0006353593,0.008294778,0.00013706971,0.000025713874,0.000023314575,0.0050845533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99221027,0.0010997414,0.0012389468,0.000674702,0.0014096792,0.003366671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997471,0.0006011679,0.00081647024,0.0003072486,0.0005291274,0.00027500011],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011266896,0.00051096047,0.0011412116,0.0002995258,0.0018061971,0.00031807707,0.0011594435,0.0005326659,0.0001884172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035330704,0.00045765765,0.00077699166,0.0003710168,0.0009925338,0.0002920996,0.00065136584,0.0055027623,0.000084912914],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018874194,0.00034165892,0.009320457,0.00005881911,0.0040603005,0.0001318176,0.008441326,0.00008511198,0.0000377447,0.8370112,0.011885748,0.12673838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008023525,0.000170951,0.00045861796,0.00053267006,0.0005767481,0.000031103034,0.0053191,0.000009992532,0.000017520479,0.8226606,0.16873176,0.00068854186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063446197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13213474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62385076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003046176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027316727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417315006","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2025.10060","title":"The Declaratory Theory of Judicial Law-Making","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University College London","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Adjudication; Positivism; Natural (archaeology); Legal positivism; Judicial opinion","score_opus":0.024187802881114162,"score_gpt":0.3113280521631375,"score_spread":0.28714024928202336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417315006","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034518544,0.027367247,0.00051971426,0.008330715,0.0027948157,0.00016037974,0.000013885069,0.000009463872,0.9262852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976733,0.00023905934,0.000038806862,0.001574388,0.00031760609,0.0000015294776,6.049223e-8,0.0000026062094,0.00015265864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878556,0.00020667506,0.00033377224,0.00007841365,0.00030053916,0.00029505545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986578,0.00046801582,0.00020143691,0.00009335244,0.00040964494,0.00016969925],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015285905,0.000073694995,0.00017589769,0.00006240742,0.002214405,0.0000758686,0.00054588774,0.00006358994,0.00003508193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004920365,0.00005632884,0.00011013362,0.00025708927,0.0030873355,0.00016062731,0.000021999764,0.00020559799,0.000004933714],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015088514,0.000004368101,0.0013140421,0.0000023871025,0.00004582869,0.000027663846,0.0013337329,0.000007663796,0.000013962348,0.99378306,0.0011173047,0.0023349228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000080510894,0.000021181902,0.0021569724,0.0002019797,0.000037546823,0.0000034391137,0.0018276522,3.6650192e-7,0.00007244325,0.42500055,0.5705334,0.00006396891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06323579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6756939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96315473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018047345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039543174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W44867640","doi":"","title":"Outsiders: The Sources and Impact of Secrecy at the Iacobucci Inquiry","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Secrecy; Commission; Political science; Relation (database); Scholarship; Democracy; Economic Justice; Corporate governance; Sociology; Diversity (politics); Public administration; Law; Public relations; Management","score_opus":0.018416710493985827,"score_gpt":0.31146328425903363,"score_spread":0.29304657376504784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W44867640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9816464,0.005361256,0.00007076223,0.0074239373,0.00026518057,0.00008545431,0.000001594271,0.000008126848,0.0051372666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937299,0.004906926,0.0000021883664,0.00007953739,0.0008061382,0.000002197468,2.1730672e-7,0.0000033383421,0.00046955718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998566,0.00011915467,0.00013456936,0.000079641606,0.00028259645,0.00081806845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999485,0.00019451788,0.000117544325,0.000073165254,0.00008212046,0.000047654365],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020380004,0.00007562802,0.00010288235,0.000022684819,0.001989499,0.00005295274,0.00024100317,0.00004683139,0.00007706818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021698822,0.00003173247,0.000118743796,0.00012880999,0.0014753826,0.000099052835,0.000066529625,0.0008993472,0.000007987928],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047296784,0.000028655506,0.06547022,8.4293254e-7,0.0003372752,7.953131e-7,0.018741632,0.000014195135,0.00056072255,0.8939892,0.0005921124,0.020217044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026851834,0.00015177128,0.034017514,0.0000083971245,0.0000649563,0.00011249858,0.06319075,0.000003319618,0.000038216793,0.8864157,0.015608772,0.00011955635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074207056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09659521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0891745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019729881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017451318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W46320438","doi":"","title":"Developments in Constitutional Law: The 2013 Term","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Charter; Law; Political science; Supreme court; Constitutional law; Federalism; Context (archaeology); Doctrine; Human rights; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.03055673725031119,"score_gpt":0.29506117590874764,"score_spread":0.2645044386584364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W46320438","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10222136,0.0135266,0.0011655219,0.034098182,0.0017084432,0.00035996523,0.0000037559253,0.000052117084,0.84686404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958316,0.0026584624,0.000022124495,0.00038824833,0.0003942904,0.00000691243,8.3656863e-7,0.0000019098045,0.0006955906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808484,0.00011987902,0.00016355545,0.00008848926,0.0004355892,0.0011076288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965984,0.000045265635,0.000056581877,0.000037639427,0.00012261904,0.00007806628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023442754,0.00006977041,0.00008734104,0.000036093537,0.0009985097,0.000053857595,0.00024574003,0.000040839674,0.0000139163885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000100067,0.000047940342,0.000036672514,0.00017247282,0.0012904067,0.00018554112,0.000036841913,0.0006436264,0.00009747204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010763965,0.000021083504,0.011401434,1.2570406e-7,0.000028350745,0.0000029100172,0.0010282906,0.000009758479,0.0000014202265,0.9854036,0.00043909784,0.0016531479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034808496,0.000020524747,0.0025586812,0.0000105719555,0.0000062882777,0.00004648303,0.0085835075,5.6288263e-7,0.0000014057567,0.7684491,0.21988899,0.00008575789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006548472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10846041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89361024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012431666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009061935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99655575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W47389072","doi":"","title":"The Theory of Strategic Legitimacy Cultivation: The Supreme Court of Canada and the Marshall Case","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Supreme court; Political science; Politics; Context (archaeology); Relevance (law); Power (physics); Law; Law and economics; Judicial review; Sociology","score_opus":0.019084891895844693,"score_gpt":0.25994524284040255,"score_spread":0.24086035094455785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W47389072","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.775014,0.029140834,0.00024532148,0.0930844,0.00029991945,0.00048167785,0.000008914793,0.000009581588,0.101715386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944089,0.004896857,0.0000015600689,0.00015816903,0.00017707574,0.0000018677938,1.434208e-7,0.0000014554869,0.00035398663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856365,0.00030201592,0.00018981715,0.000055494816,0.0003322754,0.0005567372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907774,0.000503902,0.00015832244,0.00006535122,0.00016902732,0.00002565098],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003485177,0.000060354443,0.00010332612,0.000008948698,0.0019733733,0.00003417719,0.00021946979,0.000019179332,0.000009064338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017047136,0.000026175008,0.000048366084,0.000120931436,0.0010930323,0.00005862782,0.000015262289,0.00040835375,1.5886455e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006332923,0.000007335351,0.00017065131,3.756252e-7,0.0000636134,0.0000041303597,0.0010095971,0.000007141798,0.000005206103,0.99494714,0.0000924568,0.0036290078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028171044,0.00004036672,0.0009003648,0.000006856184,0.00002831974,0.00020677509,0.052122757,0.0000063459333,0.000005730013,0.9446786,0.00168545,0.00003669054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2663483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88065207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61430377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019217025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005108809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99932593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W48450459","doi":"","title":"Weak form of judicial review: apontamentos sobre o controle de constitucionalidade no Canadá, Nova Zelândia, Israel e Inglaterra","year":2012,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Ethnology; Sociology","score_opus":0.021469438550876525,"score_gpt":0.2847764196814032,"score_spread":0.2633069811305267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W48450459","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16948383,0.041455317,0.0004965661,0.011356532,0.0033086014,0.0017034812,0.0008825093,0.00014449222,0.77116865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849536,0.009053556,0.0000840289,0.002501002,0.0013157205,0.000016486933,0.000042522934,0.000022941638,0.0020101727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963911,0.00054540747,0.00052798406,0.00038682797,0.0008510905,0.001297569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99771905,0.00053567684,0.00052254606,0.00025241668,0.00036319048,0.0006071486],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016459463,0.00040909406,0.0008914387,0.00021582161,0.0010539237,0.00006456107,0.000592031,0.00042667182,0.0010932751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054882193,0.0004549192,0.00040167573,0.00073369546,0.001923669,0.0006266505,0.00023403972,0.00046428252,0.00031935386],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035662448,0.000693969,0.08127875,0.0004555161,0.0010363762,0.00010371281,0.027049745,0.00001391039,0.0007216639,0.74106365,0.14147367,0.0057524117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031274466,0.00022278844,0.053160664,0.0022622035,0.0013782678,0.000045781908,0.024129923,0.000065707965,0.00009700994,0.004966525,0.9093355,0.0012081694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.114329025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04157581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81546974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010174732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020575202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W560460769","doi":"","title":"Constitutional battles between parliament and the executive: the Canadian prorogation crisis (日加法政セミナー2010報告)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"法政理論","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Constitutional crisis; Law; Constitution; Politics","score_opus":0.057089818003868364,"score_gpt":0.2828344671331767,"score_spread":0.22574464912930836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W560460769","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044458143,0.0016519723,0.0002452133,0.0740468,0.0006329756,0.00092746655,0.0000776952,0.000054211134,0.87790555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99871236,0.000113328104,0.00004427002,0.00068335223,0.00026129378,0.000047449834,0.000002813121,0.000001209288,0.0001339281],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992291,0.00012575781,0.00010165297,0.000111058354,0.0002407876,0.00019169846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995785,0.00014373219,0.00004034113,0.00006546904,0.00008800407,0.000083968494],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006151057,0.00006372893,0.0000859172,0.000015906298,0.002922248,0.000056084464,0.00014487593,0.000043384553,0.000121761754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012721843,0.00003485803,0.000033438828,0.00010471579,0.004959571,0.00008587984,0.00003261069,0.00008402579,0.000041571137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061184255,0.0000042979227,0.028744131,5.193375e-7,0.000031815744,7.629973e-7,0.008763133,1.823119e-7,1.6742463e-7,0.95833975,0.0028407464,0.0012683534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044475475,0.000016504659,0.23077348,0.000016833716,0.0000955254,0.0000016968503,0.020962927,0.000002013195,0.000023680994,0.23533003,0.5121682,0.00016434607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66866523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.68018675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9542542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009446631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042789872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99837583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W56382558","doi":"","title":"The Political Origins of Constitutional Courts: Italy, Germany, France, Poland, Canada, United Kingdom","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Politics; Kingdom; German; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.021111915965579754,"score_gpt":0.2916644706298031,"score_spread":0.27055255466422334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W56382558","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11931915,0.00037387694,0.00047063068,0.072199486,0.00076825556,0.00021066994,0.000108275024,0.000054590604,0.8064951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966733,0.000028860764,0.000023844586,0.0025597052,0.00026483982,0.0000020850302,0.000004596636,9.403811e-7,0.00044181722],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988223,0.00004502972,0.00017960773,0.00009727044,0.0005086591,0.00034715852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993042,0.00024981805,0.00004329208,0.000067922985,0.0002178526,0.000116916184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016707362,0.00007263917,0.00011454075,0.000029968249,0.0012697073,0.000025167788,0.00017291565,0.000039439845,0.00008900157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017340342,0.000048298385,0.000041327847,0.00024325463,0.0024901493,0.00005743685,0.000017580094,0.00008223165,0.000008215638],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060838343,0.000020150788,0.0057619493,4.1383663e-7,0.000018138739,0.0000037418465,0.00004092101,0.000003298643,0.000009710826,0.9900125,0.003985997,0.00013703953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014186627,0.000014314136,0.02203729,0.000009381636,0.000011408988,0.000001810469,0.0008322808,0.00000760595,0.00002058465,0.059833445,0.9170035,0.0000865076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9042447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7350235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9301791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026196399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020976579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97656906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W564531261","doi":"","title":"Political dispute and judicial review : assessing the work of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Nelson/Thomson Learning eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Politics; Law; Political science; Work (physics); Certiorari; Original jurisdiction; Engineering","score_opus":0.024415139642079194,"score_gpt":0.2871366400372325,"score_spread":0.2627215003951533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W564531261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000966047,0.009057423,0.0000061289334,0.005064665,0.00039262904,0.0004003067,0.000017060656,0.000020480107,0.98407525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62611264,0.0020749364,0.000033249024,0.0018780348,0.0015726027,0.000027268476,0.000006825292,0.000041785715,0.36825266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973784,0.00049804884,0.00044450708,0.00024969465,0.0009844059,0.0004449262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848044,0.0006587455,0.0003901322,0.00018835226,0.00017666354,0.000105695515],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008659949,0.00022031621,0.0005820408,0.000025517149,0.0014241845,0.000039042738,0.00041587962,0.00017132975,0.00008220814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054756843,0.00014143261,0.00017155454,0.000098126504,0.0022506095,0.000032193082,0.00015529376,0.00075167476,0.0000014165688],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021168875,0.000017368338,0.003450439,0.00042020407,0.00020829053,0.0000104895125,0.0020176235,0.000012531934,0.000003643883,0.9065242,0.056688946,0.030625131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008821704,0.00001835568,0.004583029,0.004945272,0.00024852168,0.0000025714355,0.0005382875,0.0000016685739,0.000004022665,0.013493431,0.9758674,0.00020921983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14543746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.085682124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9191785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025485683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052629593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W565867575","doi":"","title":"Constitutionalizing everything: the role of \"Charter values\"","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitution; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Context (archaeology); Scope (computer science); Perspective (graphical); Normative; United Nations Charter; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Politics","score_opus":0.025182750580389688,"score_gpt":0.26079776554921974,"score_spread":0.23561501496883006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W565867575","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08339204,0.008288904,0.0015778465,0.008560182,0.0010990459,0.0011207142,0.000033922333,0.00019301064,0.8957343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979061,0.000528467,0.00037068245,0.00029174262,0.0004988735,0.0000856136,0.0000057970724,0.0000049541295,0.00030776832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846244,0.00015565059,0.00038497362,0.00024615123,0.0004088519,0.00034196113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870694,0.00039621172,0.0001669693,0.00020346137,0.00042450498,0.000101904974],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004888314,0.0001609409,0.00025004102,0.00007352541,0.002020662,0.00009458917,0.00038388208,0.0000999589,0.0005695989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050086697,0.00012326444,0.00016306812,0.00032795066,0.0050305463,0.00039902536,0.000101095146,0.00015924334,0.00030318912],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042221463,0.00005575601,0.0070278617,0.0000075983285,0.00007368562,0.0000015895431,0.0025587836,0.000087843626,0.000502948,0.9873807,0.0006198103,0.0016792093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034733463,0.000028432387,0.0048104567,0.00029188895,0.00010955431,0.000028033632,0.033637375,0.000118100776,0.0004897665,0.36608928,0.59361815,0.00043159275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070969253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007510457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91451406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000108353335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068151474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W56764392","doi":"","title":"MARBURY V. MADISON AND CANADIAN CONSTITUTIONALISM: RHETORIC AND PRACTICE","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Rhetoric; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Democracy; Politics; Theology","score_opus":0.009319932124885218,"score_gpt":0.2007924339054176,"score_spread":0.19147250178053238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W56764392","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23070349,0.042435963,0.00024939823,0.023086041,0.0007906232,0.00039589382,0.0000604294,0.00012519248,0.70215297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99424773,0.0023033621,0.00061583327,0.00069321296,0.00018556409,0.000009102047,0.000008174111,0.0000047904223,0.0019322314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870056,0.00010125698,0.00014306005,0.0003009972,0.00039543945,0.00035865838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897605,0.00015436241,0.000077343466,0.00009120381,0.00019294585,0.0005081072],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032397598,0.00014961089,0.00015291088,0.00014713814,0.013812809,0.000069929294,0.00012398118,0.00013641485,0.000019647956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031907248,0.00016767769,0.000048844835,0.00024463187,0.0017866774,0.00053005375,0.00009783851,0.00014731259,0.000022574797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007628625,0.000035598037,0.007749875,0.0000051882635,0.00007684482,0.0006729534,0.013395633,0.00010110036,0.00012759348,0.9763212,0.0003798706,0.0010578245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088642177,0.00004463762,0.04190791,0.00006389544,0.00013643796,0.0011743042,0.040023025,0.000008646877,0.000050814713,0.017448021,0.8978776,0.00037831636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87917936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5640172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9588732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003993176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003746745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W56873797","doi":"","title":"Women legislators and women's issues in British Columbia","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.02345531210397092,"score_gpt":0.25546771299883564,"score_spread":0.23201240089486472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W56873797","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79131013,0.18687254,5.05736e-8,0.004184346,0.0001387334,0.00036935025,0.000036021705,0.00001607393,0.01707274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6140157,0.37628895,0.000010325458,0.008033963,0.000107416745,0.00012900024,0.000003850351,0.0000041864414,0.0014066125],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890804,0.00008647099,0.00017449714,0.00018264832,0.00016159684,0.00048676203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941176,0.000020726588,0.00002977206,0.00006476996,0.000026352143,0.00044663853],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034476613,0.00006235196,0.00026249408,0.000028446852,0.0007128667,0.00006317533,0.00011066816,0.000032725733,0.0018059654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006992154,0.00009935,0.000023810693,0.00028181658,0.0005539081,0.00015322882,0.000018323999,0.000075768716,0.0000389866],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.677803e-7,0.000022733617,0.7373345,0.00012653682,0.000038712486,0.00039460819,0.0076576923,7.735251e-8,1.7946255e-7,0.00071617874,0.18927188,0.06443604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007881298,0.00001388309,0.06796816,0.00048090328,0.0000038794988,0.000010698807,0.0037059574,4.6958537e-8,1.7733374e-8,0.0010751574,0.9265393,0.0001231498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9892607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99837786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73726743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091784645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063253974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W569840623","doi":"","title":"Essential readings in Canadian constitutional politics","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.028220080188223126,"score_gpt":0.27569919716675356,"score_spread":0.24747911697853042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W569840623","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000016374073,0.0003291794,0.000023116603,0.0009790435,0.00074737135,0.00016587772,0.000085877524,0.000033480726,0.9976197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12182477,0.00026346123,0.00004252296,0.000728606,0.0012485957,0.000010192037,0.00005149139,0.000005655641,0.8758247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867666,0.00002917294,0.00020311997,0.00021371667,0.00031926914,0.00055806816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936247,0.000056974277,0.00005002435,0.00006314251,0.00013925976,0.000328115],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002537547,0.00014349756,0.00021656386,0.00022591863,0.00074063096,0.000033163156,0.0002102206,0.00031281635,0.0026931148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012656036,0.00014964765,0.00007480206,0.000090080655,0.0040289015,0.00007776505,0.00003551096,0.00022869185,0.0005689259],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.803136e-7,0.0000067738442,0.0009451348,0.0000021698381,0.000018635663,0.00003438784,0.0006455828,1.200471e-7,7.329269e-8,0.95024973,0.04802946,0.000066974346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041433515,0.0000029526411,0.00013567206,0.000039253056,0.000011434741,0.0000010700727,0.00013949352,1.324675e-7,5.405691e-7,0.30048695,0.6990013,0.00013971503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9670267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.988555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6509719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014466422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019885197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99868155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W582837541","doi":"10.3138/9781442684898","title":"Empirical Gap in Jurisprudence: A Comprehensive Study of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Precedent; Majority opinion; Judicial opinion; Empirical research; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0693715708397739,"score_gpt":0.3457660307073014,"score_spread":0.2763944598675275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W582837541","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041529585,0.0004323476,0.0000013894004,0.0008301001,0.000388323,0.00057556696,0.000019864903,0.0000056855474,0.9562171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89566445,0.000060397215,0.000004905442,0.00029551476,0.00014121683,0.0000062039467,9.704884e-7,0.000004277782,0.10382208],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792933,0.00011276437,0.00038813293,0.00016851701,0.0011852573,0.00021596412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989243,0.00035389938,0.00018712286,0.00013099225,0.00035808026,0.0000456069],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023839905,0.00012387891,0.00040627123,0.000051241663,0.00023648655,0.000004227904,0.00038723258,0.00011826258,0.00011871124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009738146,0.00008494526,0.00006887836,0.00022763804,0.0009197195,0.000019991445,0.00014512934,0.0002244899,0.0000011574782],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089177134,0.0007869565,0.17009646,0.000060416478,0.00038794702,0.000060865616,0.026000865,0.000060193095,0.000005412304,0.32659665,0.47542372,0.00043135037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006983657,0.00017586516,0.288645,0.00031599568,0.00011391784,8.828526e-7,0.058003966,0.0000014225244,0.000009405198,0.027896902,0.623719,0.000419284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92759275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99629134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85413486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042850833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006950915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99867874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W600801085","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2615","title":"Book Notes: The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism: Theory and Practice, by Stephen Gardbaum","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Constitutionalism; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030368157828518594,"score_gpt":0.3020101096435849,"score_spread":0.2716419518150663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W600801085","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014360687,0.01737272,0.009028729,0.051610462,0.00015615729,0.00024805657,0.000024938603,0.00001882752,0.9213965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98478234,0.0031701413,0.00067935925,0.009926511,0.0003199688,0.0000070223236,0.000001883116,0.000005344182,0.0011074333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835914,0.00049052265,0.00027412674,0.00011610821,0.0004993714,0.0002607554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99793535,0.0012721507,0.00024340351,0.00008797361,0.00025930535,0.00020183889],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015951374,0.00010610458,0.00018009226,0.000017705766,0.0021136224,0.00013857502,0.00024053243,0.000066862536,0.000347443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006144471,0.0000712725,0.00006527092,0.00006753283,0.002136766,0.0006013665,0.00006816769,0.00026623075,0.000025011028],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003258435,0.00003708374,0.000051830284,0.0000018086524,0.00006247674,0.0000010979345,0.0012675106,0.00007137934,0.00004001425,0.8977115,0.09976293,0.0009597596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002999,0.000028931696,0.000044908164,0.00003565994,0.000059961734,0.000039838975,0.0036489593,0.000046307396,0.000013649293,0.6970582,0.2986162,0.00010746681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0702251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015374283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98463875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005753877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005848738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W600925096","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1025","title":"Evaluating Federally Appointed Judges in Canada: Analyzing the Controversy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Brock University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.058888185128276954,"score_gpt":0.3342579118559903,"score_spread":0.2753697267277133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W600925096","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05929806,0.004106085,0.00012939371,0.013446337,0.00090301957,0.00015419284,0.0000037193356,0.0000145856875,0.9219446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980333,0.00012822375,0.00010776052,0.0008203006,0.0008378779,0.000004536896,5.25814e-7,0.000004086588,0.000063428364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982993,0.00033269092,0.00024983074,0.00008336416,0.0005365667,0.00049822533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992444,0.00029416571,0.0001336971,0.000055456803,0.00013302527,0.00013927965],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019145821,0.000088732595,0.00015803968,0.00002167726,0.0026767408,0.00011364439,0.0002125679,0.000030428546,0.00019916247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042007596,0.00006150508,0.00006108458,0.00015136487,0.00022261184,0.0002756292,0.000043924192,0.00030935963,0.000010847356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015736052,0.000020109286,0.07696636,9.5283224e-7,0.000051909046,0.000008786362,0.0015441369,0.000108797154,0.000036328056,0.9167113,0.0007404249,0.003795181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038395214,0.0001327957,0.3674511,0.00037964058,0.00031250334,0.00017809191,0.112549745,0.0005021473,0.00011197286,0.39593658,0.11729302,0.0013128982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99433196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99970555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9387352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082247914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011937559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99862164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W620324408","doi":"10.5860/choice.39-1208","title":"In the grip of freedom: law and modernity in Max Weber","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Choice Reviews Online","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Politics; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Charter; Modernity; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0929014354011797,"score_gpt":0.375346137139923,"score_spread":0.28244470173874325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W620324408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5284239,0.19341442,0.00002589523,0.025916928,0.00027564444,0.0011729026,0.000034654495,0.000016542423,0.2507191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86079264,0.13586581,0.00017938559,0.0024496475,0.0004685294,0.000026381145,0.000004065315,0.0000026073421,0.00021094178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925214,0.00017924428,0.0002165086,0.00009298841,0.00013671276,0.00012242781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967885,0.00014473205,0.0000556912,0.00007290326,0.000026915195,0.00002093601],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078207406,0.000055703575,0.00020622411,0.00002006305,0.00011493786,0.000007884297,0.00013508058,0.000032442265,0.000036890277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003225173,0.000035396293,0.000033098742,0.00027757525,0.00041269555,0.00009829868,0.000028291535,0.00010129471,0.000007650576],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021594506,0.000860632,0.19210148,0.00013588104,0.00001817925,0.00002245855,0.00826614,0.000021822983,0.000052863496,0.7514794,0.002551587,0.044468004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014143261,0.00000787058,0.039715294,0.0001367819,0.000008139184,9.0527215e-7,0.0004270748,0.000011102669,3.39344e-7,0.00960906,0.9498882,0.00005376548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039494272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3371583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9473367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022231909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032324242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96690184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W625926543","doi":"10.5860/choice.48-5932","title":"The judge as political theorist: contemporary constitutional review","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Choice Reviews Online","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.17377178523529777,"score_gpt":0.40114993486231043,"score_spread":0.22737814962701267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W625926543","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000060035636,0.4704444,0.00004677947,0.013359961,0.00041139324,0.0005771798,0.000032271553,0.000043494645,0.5150245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18032931,0.79276437,0.0002610584,0.021972641,0.002131283,0.000164332,0.0000458758,0.000008911772,0.0023222468],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981252,0.00042076706,0.0004991096,0.00021603412,0.00034560057,0.00039326816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998769,0.0004517336,0.00015350565,0.00021493419,0.00020199965,0.00020883468],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015716312,0.00014983142,0.00038036582,0.000016151442,0.001418339,0.000024491426,0.000403449,0.00005710866,0.0004404189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00408516,0.00008965361,0.00020840405,0.00025962258,0.004028227,0.00013797404,0.0000786041,0.00019414531,0.0007151409],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000408164,0.000073446565,0.0008079944,0.00006059354,0.000020178413,0.0000040406967,0.00008350996,1.5523038e-9,7.1428275e-7,0.97385085,0.016669286,0.008425318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000775598,0.00001685758,0.00079841516,0.0010149734,0.000042012784,0.0000043694904,0.00021342441,1.0221549e-7,0.0000013178336,0.046285525,0.95142585,0.00011961787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031491574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010827865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9347565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000853076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008329486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W626926647","doi":"10.21991/c9pq1s","title":"JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE AND JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION: THE CASE OF PROVINCIAL COURT JUDGES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial independence; Judicial discretion; Judicial activism; Political science; Administration (probate law); Independence (probability theory); Judicial opinion; Law; Judicial review; Supreme court; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.03777566139922089,"score_gpt":0.2853693183396633,"score_spread":0.24759365694044239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W626926647","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19730903,0.0037309641,0.02152616,0.023407053,0.005122262,0.0028380079,0.0009334024,0.00038664285,0.7447465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99783564,0.00018598835,0.0004547511,0.00073971885,0.0005894847,0.00009992321,0.000018474442,0.00000725288,0.00006875267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99716896,0.00018670186,0.0007176378,0.0005094389,0.0007185011,0.0006987621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980994,0.00029081738,0.00034284923,0.000258744,0.0007500868,0.00025813133],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094433513,0.00032518647,0.00041492877,0.0001641077,0.005259226,0.000085287924,0.00042228802,0.0002926163,0.0003798766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009946264,0.00027142622,0.00018950367,0.0005023597,0.028231671,0.00070198235,0.0002537205,0.00038656127,0.00005072368],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016123691,0.00015325451,0.024338737,0.00000912624,0.000099287136,0.00034578404,0.0011369658,0.000005395348,0.00002175361,0.9701155,0.0015164161,0.0020965387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031515642,0.0006476303,0.013315793,0.00032231022,0.0006519225,0.0063483138,0.071325645,0.000119023796,0.0007988917,0.7725586,0.1290098,0.0017504641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010820779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037254006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8005266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017003766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004655705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W629870081","doi":"","title":"Arbitration and Judicial Power under the united States Constitution","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Arbitration; Political science; Humanities; Power (physics); Executive power; Philosophy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.027100859850531647,"score_gpt":0.3050279278552139,"score_spread":0.27792706800468225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W629870081","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35693264,0.00024806734,0.011293176,0.011777771,0.00031948733,0.0001650225,0.0000022098252,0.0000705389,0.6191911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99627656,0.0001894734,0.00003574893,0.0032172648,0.00014392039,0.0000018207594,0.0000048126485,9.3563807e-7,0.00012945369],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943703,0.00003742785,0.00009570828,0.00008014633,0.00019541013,0.0001542539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964756,0.00016157563,0.00002549109,0.000030937557,0.000093178714,0.000041233805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060390023,0.000046577064,0.00004798359,0.000036793976,0.0012761157,0.000043449905,0.000045509383,0.000037165883,0.00008867503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059647693,0.00003039961,0.000015528234,0.0002452662,0.0013894427,0.00008731377,0.000016853895,0.00005784976,0.000017980095],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000091133925,0.0000095657115,0.0013371124,1.9387964e-7,0.000009731531,8.2077656e-7,0.0013460966,0.00001071826,0.000022634817,0.9963369,0.0006019788,0.0003151472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000326962,0.000049607886,0.073510766,0.000016180302,0.000035115296,0.0000030960887,0.080497414,0.000030529103,0.00014776054,0.41202158,0.43313625,0.00022474922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024314025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025074355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6393439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036498957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008789653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9927155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W630622461","doi":"","title":"Judicial activism : authority, principle and policy in the judicial method","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Sweet & Maxwell eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Judicial activism; Economic Justice; Legislation; Judicial review; Judicial independence; Context (archaeology); History","score_opus":0.037927482324531143,"score_gpt":0.3576384883402034,"score_spread":0.31971100601567226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W630622461","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019321297,0.00059609633,0.0001577067,0.004460731,0.00054570957,0.00090530555,0.000047695627,0.00008705927,0.99300647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32245216,0.00077516737,0.0006982723,0.0064859297,0.022052702,0.0002999659,0.00008334031,0.0001229176,0.6470295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99675685,0.00045912017,0.000448303,0.0005900583,0.0010227337,0.0007229539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882466,0.00041813584,0.0002513613,0.0002576526,0.000095474345,0.0001526943],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018223848,0.00041812667,0.0006370472,0.0002889084,0.0015839338,0.00016295994,0.0006496441,0.00056937186,0.00003413741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030616816,0.000348881,0.00020083658,0.00017899412,0.0019486368,0.00010399561,0.00032907768,0.0009476934,0.000031787953],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032036354,0.000032739586,0.000023949258,0.000019366727,0.000057476194,0.00005448943,0.014187618,0.0000020860678,0.000004594717,0.96748394,0.0021412864,0.015960414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002156401,0.000035729197,0.00037020422,0.000086021224,0.000054418448,0.0000036513143,0.00046106326,4.309382e-7,0.0000034849966,0.49786296,0.5006748,0.00023158448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033124704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035064142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49853352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010652586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008007178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W630817675","doi":"","title":"Constitutional litigation in Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Thomson/Carswell eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.018389158184894852,"score_gpt":0.2374740055349331,"score_spread":0.21908484735003825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W630817675","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00035395657,0.0006893948,0.000030036668,0.00038967768,0.0009101004,0.00041297308,0.00017229207,0.000054017233,0.9969876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23920918,0.000053081167,0.000045234763,0.0005154086,0.0015040158,0.000048905997,0.00015120824,0.000013644631,0.7584593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976318,0.00011743201,0.00043662282,0.00037783931,0.0009376323,0.0004986856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916714,0.00020775797,0.00018774085,0.00014559968,0.00016701895,0.00012472742],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034424252,0.000281591,0.00042215004,0.000080709484,0.00067364704,0.00004570928,0.00029105492,0.0002574839,0.00016657163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006201688,0.0003086113,0.000109029075,0.00006929081,0.002328398,0.000056098852,0.000071529714,0.00042279263,0.00008176696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007107748,0.0000072189137,0.0006116133,0.000010986645,0.000024090685,0.00006855926,0.0002831384,0.000024300089,0.0000010018132,0.92772293,0.06855052,0.0026885257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001688909,0.0000057900406,0.000475297,0.0001742822,0.00002785225,0.0000019084152,0.0002292351,0.00000223075,0.000004780719,0.13289174,0.8656986,0.00031940933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9747694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99695796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79714805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004012894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02638132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W631063379","doi":"","title":"Supreme court of Canada : supreme court, law of Canada, lawsuit, appeal, judge, chief justice of Canada, history of the supreme court of Canada, judicial committee of the privy council","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Betascript Pub. eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Original jurisdiction; Certiorari; Remand (court procedure); Court of equity; Appeal; Majority opinion; Court of record; Lawsuit; Precedent","score_opus":0.04074741758313307,"score_gpt":0.20833892520182187,"score_spread":0.1675915076186888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W631063379","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005150093,0.0048053917,0.0000028354639,0.0018986171,0.006437547,0.0015700136,0.009548139,0.000014889709,0.9705725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7695654,0.00007482496,0.000019370065,0.0011273957,0.00044632633,0.00003827074,0.000037377395,0.00007222008,0.22861882],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874901,0.0005580363,0.002522407,0.0006632562,0.007478136,0.0012880217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898356,0.0005765821,0.0035077084,0.0013112102,0.0043384274,0.00043045828],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020661703,0.0008206298,0.0024808138,0.000093514835,0.0010147236,0.000009519905,0.0030391153,0.0004510034,0.00022657528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007665289,0.0006786582,0.00047825268,0.00023311688,0.005915878,0.000089399226,0.00058742857,0.0008741264,1.417912e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012205554,0.00009354386,0.00088342145,0.0006658,0.0008708026,0.000013048199,0.0023666117,0.000037603055,0.00023676905,0.16426055,0.83040345,0.00004636822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073329045,0.00009213591,0.0055968654,0.0008753229,0.0013875896,0.0000045841057,0.0022181645,0.0000066167954,0.0012415093,0.0028131776,0.9843278,0.0007029487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7644153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013289602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.38278458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W638564284","doi":"","title":"Law and rights : global perspectives on constitutionalism and governance","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Political science; Enforcement; Law; Context (archaeology); Rule of law; Constitutional law; Democracy; Politics; Corporate governance; Meaning (existential); Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.010278476992866508,"score_gpt":0.25978799839127553,"score_spread":0.249509521398409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W638564284","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4856461,0.034530282,0.00019824656,0.0067701614,0.0002312018,0.000110051624,0.000013850652,0.00003443223,0.47246566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97305584,0.026070107,0.000019198036,0.00023230523,0.00037884756,0.0000015577349,2.1573379e-7,0.0000013504138,0.00024058111],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871224,0.000056347035,0.00009073079,0.0001447804,0.0002933197,0.0007025777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997197,0.00004218367,0.000054257354,0.000029699344,0.00007742961,0.000076739634],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003656514,0.00008122683,0.0001040416,0.000010101086,0.0027482603,0.00003113151,0.00007375973,0.000041339248,0.0000130797225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056994562,0.000066719025,0.000032497515,0.00008556788,0.0021012074,0.00016489092,0.00002004658,0.00035941933,0.000008432943],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020850726,0.00002311412,0.0019555038,2.4150017e-7,0.000043983313,0.000008933866,0.0011185653,7.9876014e-7,0.0000012201591,0.9963595,0.0000685876,0.00039865705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030506685,0.0000794736,0.006740957,0.000012787472,0.000011559994,0.00038482627,0.0050598253,5.3592584e-7,0.0000012873023,0.93073577,0.056563336,0.0001045518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071718083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025602669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48740974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000656825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012269381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99943954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W642658120","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1266","title":"Book Notes: Are Judges Political?: An Empirical Analysis of the Federal Judiciary, by Cass R. Sunstein, David Schkade, Lisa M. Ellman and Andreas Sawicki","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Politics; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03132276836065787,"score_gpt":0.33287256854290775,"score_spread":0.30154980018224986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W642658120","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26517674,0.018400963,0.0008254522,0.041887835,0.0006083607,0.00039691987,0.00013963199,0.00008075752,0.6724833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944241,0.0004359671,0.00006169934,0.004418004,0.00047120432,0.0000016611701,0.000005260819,0.0000087467215,0.00017335107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99747884,0.00028830615,0.00046835787,0.00026708626,0.00083359034,0.00066383474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851346,0.00031910534,0.00026319956,0.00016284578,0.0002729523,0.00046844286],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011203068,0.00018726068,0.00043461015,0.00010276406,0.003045746,0.00019004468,0.00035191263,0.00015832894,0.0002788563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002464226,0.00013501054,0.0002475406,0.00050447066,0.0018735996,0.00035168405,0.00011008854,0.00038928573,0.0000045812403],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054551987,0.00023929929,0.47377402,0.000004477744,0.000672914,0.000039577535,0.001608346,0.000011150022,0.000066906876,0.5175016,0.005083876,0.00094325404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012737736,0.0002811639,0.76163477,0.00017351225,0.0020575535,0.00010525039,0.017913451,0.0000678072,0.0005521326,0.09971255,0.115355164,0.0008728589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10905896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4838773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72924733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016885248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016702995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99825215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W644252459","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1234","title":"Constitutional Questions about Canada's New Political Finance Regime","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Politics; Parliament; Campaign finance; Charter; Political science; Democracy; Supreme court; Law; Political economy; Economics; Public administration","score_opus":0.020851839523240236,"score_gpt":0.2919383808428328,"score_spread":0.2710865413195926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W644252459","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00053888693,0.001342225,0.005238324,0.016625358,0.0011579491,0.00006789873,0.000017784765,0.00003049202,0.97498107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935388,0.00016338985,0.00093127735,0.0017608682,0.0023885933,0.0000012741325,0.0000021502117,0.0000032151443,0.0012104325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980748,0.00006508398,0.00029815215,0.00015182719,0.0007093017,0.0007007886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889076,0.00017524709,0.00009620013,0.000073505515,0.00026212184,0.00050214195],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006379788,0.0001165391,0.0001613285,0.000023878769,0.0032891438,0.000094049596,0.0002292336,0.000084461106,0.00023726623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026225863,0.000110230016,0.00008031035,0.00016134241,0.0020300525,0.00019000984,0.000033616827,0.00034651312,0.000039054386],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012319835,0.000025539164,0.0010602324,6.58287e-7,0.000023438315,0.000121691366,0.000083882675,0.00001497884,0.000004788115,0.989685,0.0075252755,0.0014421898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001997656,0.000012967706,0.0047309217,0.00005175637,0.00001794236,0.00013645961,0.00045945318,9.333458e-7,0.000018421584,0.35525385,0.63897353,0.00014399308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98394984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9929999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065688294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004232299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99800843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W645411594","doi":"10.1515/9780773572553","title":"Constitutional Origins, Structure, and Change in Federal Countries","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02274033423511265,"score_gpt":0.245430637308551,"score_spread":0.22269030307343834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W645411594","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000092329254,0.00004854609,0.0000055547052,0.0005978489,0.00034377014,0.0005132439,0.0013511484,0.00009263201,0.9969549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07641725,0.002905222,0.00013534428,0.0009119057,0.0014457186,0.0000068610843,0.00011349733,0.000017606832,0.9180466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838763,0.00009132768,0.0001769544,0.00042472282,0.00051557145,0.0004038055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993224,0.000110458466,0.00014093067,0.00011237371,0.00016521584,0.00014862932],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012128825,0.00029471764,0.00040335534,0.0001357307,0.0019367326,0.0000633284,0.00026545222,0.0004036603,0.00006251799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021160333,0.00033144385,0.000082633676,0.000031528598,0.0035637894,0.00024651006,0.00024473172,0.00038955422,0.000006466024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049227616,0.000009598319,0.0002982621,0.000021106129,0.00006841983,0.00009701332,0.0007025453,0.0000018063315,1.1934222e-7,0.99568063,0.0023126856,0.00075857004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046857246,0.000015631484,0.00043274372,0.00014232684,0.000048381058,0.0000016607172,0.00016092973,5.819313e-7,0.0000034561574,0.004802217,0.9935562,0.00036727716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044162095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001037873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99124354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012167686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005645185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W645723559","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1078","title":"Book Review: A Perilous Imbalance: The Globalization of Canadian Law and Governance, by Stephen Clarkson and Stepan Wood","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.014905181804278973,"score_gpt":0.23644380317376262,"score_spread":0.22153862136948366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W645723559","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00028447196,0.28333068,0.000010009066,0.00297717,0.00010542516,0.0001342739,0.000037170237,0.000005537859,0.7131153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8171305,0.1747032,0.000042053245,0.0077639027,0.00011436057,0.0000038829703,0.0000012800413,0.000003854125,0.00023699242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910027,0.00011504779,0.00018671402,0.000105161525,0.00027294012,0.00021984198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994795,0.000021818509,0.00015292213,0.000060392682,0.000119537115,0.00016588252],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040259588,0.00008384658,0.00016512554,0.00001253746,0.00134671,0.000050298113,0.00014153063,0.000050741484,0.00019932803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039094237,0.00006016183,0.00003478765,0.0001342541,0.0007891725,0.00020942005,0.00002832562,0.000121001234,0.0000023498178],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008245251,0.000012384341,0.0010414114,0.000013936052,0.000030658113,0.000004455711,0.0010224261,8.8596245e-8,0.0000048185234,0.95330626,0.043899067,0.000656237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017433123,0.000043681193,0.0024128654,0.00026726155,0.00005471288,0.000029706101,0.0006312754,0.0000010777602,0.000008430264,0.02018292,0.9760942,0.00009953437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.852398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9326601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93312335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006844641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013430107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W645818486","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1285","title":"The Serendipitous Solution to the Problem of Supreme Court Appointments","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Corollary; Politics; Political science; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01940553993575264,"score_gpt":0.2662721349810654,"score_spread":0.24686659504531275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W645818486","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025755973,0.0011313288,0.00079752214,0.027329009,0.00048443108,0.00025894603,0.000009190022,0.000019455481,0.96739453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979145,0.00015411143,0.00030760095,0.00016180212,0.0008898494,0.00001016497,7.9467935e-7,0.0000035823605,0.000557614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868584,0.0001439523,0.00023946472,0.00008504732,0.00055095204,0.00029472064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994535,0.00008491267,0.00013395229,0.00007235816,0.00019356077,0.00006173899],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009436702,0.000073456846,0.00009798341,0.000014200124,0.004274195,0.000114371935,0.00031272342,0.000034954952,0.00003165831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023787172,0.00004026575,0.00008061164,0.00012888212,0.0004761939,0.00009889914,0.000055169272,0.00014345946,0.000042408952],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016159696,0.000037612193,0.0006529796,8.4818095e-7,0.000030267951,0.0000019446231,0.00047916715,0.00008756021,0.00007810475,0.9864386,0.009313949,0.0028628388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019604462,0.00006164725,0.004006492,0.000035854173,0.00003291654,0.000016257512,0.001387079,0.0000066663106,0.000102027734,0.5522562,0.4418035,0.00009530763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14514059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5470315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99533886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009640402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000117615506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970221},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W647849777","doi":"","title":"The last word : media coverage of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Medical Entomology and Zoology","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Prism; Political science; Confusion; Queen (butterfly); Vignette; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.010813963663601699,"score_gpt":0.2443697981814992,"score_spread":0.2335558345178975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W647849777","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0066926633,0.0075720414,0.000012243696,0.03304966,0.0031505227,0.00020048968,0.000046449924,0.0000086621085,0.94926727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8325565,0.009836334,0.0000043731075,0.0022880677,0.0011369683,0.000016680053,0.000012157613,0.00000861495,0.15414034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832845,0.00028330812,0.00031662302,0.00015016821,0.00063114765,0.00029027805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99760115,0.0018760448,0.0001964546,0.00011497943,0.00010704986,0.000104304265],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074460584,0.00011114467,0.00037041848,0.000020418349,0.00053809286,0.0000023827702,0.00045402735,0.00044191213,0.0006443536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014749065,0.000062851206,0.00006570764,0.00006403028,0.0076838154,0.000010392044,0.00019906758,0.00040646785,0.000002050877],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003049941,0.000020846632,0.0043727565,0.00000972237,0.00014122072,0.000023939274,0.0009185248,5.207604e-7,3.0491628e-7,0.94096506,0.038287155,0.015229463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025474498,0.000029980267,0.014733866,0.00006049716,0.00006887793,0.000018389073,0.00029142364,0.000001111908,0.0000023196794,0.19157362,0.79286456,0.0001006156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23229003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97626406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8258638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000093645496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060396134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W648427358","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511996399","title":"Judiciaries in Comparative Perspective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Context (archaeology); Democracy; Institution; Political science; Law; Set (abstract data type); Liberal democracy; Geography; Politics","score_opus":0.06642689445598031,"score_gpt":0.26940884672528104,"score_spread":0.20298195226930071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W648427358","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009225577,0.0007323857,0.000030762418,0.000057347526,0.00027683843,0.00040266663,0.000110713125,0.00008185023,0.9982152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022360539,0.0002867731,0.000015942283,0.000055235814,0.00026014523,0.000001815855,0.000009505172,0.000007878187,0.97700214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986925,0.00016294468,0.00013219648,0.00037283712,0.00031058383,0.00032893635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915576,0.00012460144,0.00013875592,0.00013819583,0.00033399576,0.00010869811],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015218601,0.00022441638,0.00043592908,0.00016879922,0.0007519976,0.000029443574,0.00041443063,0.0002740319,0.0000088150555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003577756,0.000269321,0.00013814948,0.00003525934,0.0023975973,0.000111170084,0.00022269359,0.00042291003,0.000024601239],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063396736,0.000018595838,0.00001786492,0.0000045200313,0.00009373059,0.00010581569,0.009039745,4.7287637e-7,3.2806963e-7,0.9308431,0.059763752,0.000048679514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025552968,0.000023551385,0.00018195542,0.00011334304,0.00008336393,5.8638926e-7,0.012664072,6.7827716e-7,0.0000072666594,0.00217048,0.9841851,0.0003140954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06477729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005734699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9286726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013415656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001370982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W66756667","doi":"","title":"The Debate about Judicial Supremacy in Canada and the United States: Defusing the Countermajoritarian Tension?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Political science; Tension (geology); Law; Judicial opinion; Judicial activism; Law and economics; Judicial review; Sociology; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.0062402002445559905,"score_gpt":0.23866788126017327,"score_spread":0.23242768101561728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W66756667","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94982463,0.0029558102,0.00004308809,0.04416869,0.0007735301,0.00018761732,0.0000026003431,0.0000070961605,0.0020369436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98421115,0.014261066,0.0000014155003,0.00096608367,0.0004774079,0.0000054473276,9.665686e-7,0.0000045021225,0.00007199098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977212,0.00029107908,0.00022489097,0.000100112775,0.00042662225,0.0012360873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989501,0.00064454065,0.00010766851,0.00008640551,0.0001580912,0.000053172294],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035395054,0.00009677217,0.00012214806,0.000029373508,0.005017605,0.00016808104,0.0003629182,0.000032204825,0.0000071271998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004150343,0.00004394912,0.00003934244,0.0002973601,0.0012713944,0.00008844302,0.00005467612,0.0016484932,0.0000015786471],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000898265,0.0000067735314,0.011444183,3.5840006e-7,0.00007008208,0.0000061149894,0.0031093997,0.00003075252,0.000009921195,0.9793583,0.00021817024,0.005656131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009812238,0.000019988212,0.016649839,0.00002180966,0.00004834293,0.000107150634,0.061106283,0.000323271,0.0000015856523,0.83317167,0.087420285,0.00014854352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9873173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99978566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1461866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006944077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010253937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99627775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6889814725","doi":"10.26181/25706358","title":"The Judicialisation of Parliamentary Privilege in Canada: A Cautionary Tale","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"La Trobe University","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Supreme court; Privilege (computing); Doctrine; Charter; Autonomy; Common law; Constitution; Legislation","score_opus":0.009975819475236727,"score_gpt":0.21343572423514376,"score_spread":0.20345990475990702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6889814725","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8274604,0.0014096104,0.00008662259,0.009723878,0.0005889576,0.00016760083,0.00006371159,0.000029996809,0.16046923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993449,0.0003679383,0.000007959412,0.000031696374,0.00004151273,3.0706946e-7,0.0000020829407,7.6217043e-7,0.00020287259],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999556,0.000086849,0.000050538172,0.00006401583,0.0001555148,0.00008709728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973613,0.00018395057,0.000014866519,0.000027981116,0.000018529623,0.000018558512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001577471,0.000027752954,0.000046364854,0.000021731841,0.0003671811,0.0000063749912,0.00008320238,0.000016160262,0.000025878839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002032184,0.00002432168,0.000020904681,0.00020596145,0.0003006034,0.000079660545,0.00002995655,0.000051067836,0.0000018341402],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014624072,0.000011696406,0.034123845,0.0000034987956,0.000023413624,0.00005164926,0.0020579186,0.000030159772,0.000012552326,0.95665145,0.003801031,0.0032181714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000125669,0.000008339299,0.2308986,0.000047719543,0.000023824015,6.4832784e-7,0.032703936,0.00006903262,0.000012776328,0.014938674,0.72109,0.00008077072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9872333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9967055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94171274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006689203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001380566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28240976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6889961234","doi":"10.32920/22223386.v1","title":"Tribunal administration and the duty to consult: A study of the National Energy Board","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Jurisdiction; Duty; Principle of legality; Transparency (behavior); Appeal; Supreme court; Administration (probate law)","score_opus":0.04563958397095269,"score_gpt":0.33337553398441716,"score_spread":0.28773595001346447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6889961234","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8532359,0.00002500495,0.000028021625,0.03497203,0.00018023729,0.0003087745,0.000009592603,0.000029510826,0.11121092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99822664,0.00001766429,0.0000027921178,0.00048595853,0.00008588012,0.00003121974,3.7701807e-7,6.6375696e-7,0.0011487921],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927413,0.00010749204,0.00009384639,0.00006861387,0.00038758587,0.00006833231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995402,0.00025646292,0.000026802605,0.000026480266,0.00013029286,0.000019769228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046382047,0.00003014139,0.000060061713,0.0000154602,0.00068232085,0.000019500714,0.00008645085,0.000013345749,0.000022699931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004376369,0.00001512281,0.00002029002,0.00036417242,0.00043633825,0.000025675914,0.00005620257,0.000021292712,0.0000053284894],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003742552,0.000034875113,0.0047746594,2.5476763e-7,0.000020090996,1.7354425e-7,0.0041063256,0.00000667088,0.0000073643055,0.9874851,0.0031357545,0.00039130775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002826477,0.00025307204,0.58231527,0.000013011381,0.000061542945,0.0000011634623,0.122257404,0.000084038365,0.000098584846,0.15813398,0.13375573,0.00019971089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057606203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03714216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8293511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014071745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015836323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9804275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6894158475","doi":"10.5287/ora-44nk8629x","title":"Methods of deference in human rights adjudication","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Adjudication; Judicial deference; Standard of review; Legislature; Human rights; Interpretation (philosophy); Judicial review; Compromise","score_opus":0.05369077422976509,"score_gpt":0.359695994640522,"score_spread":0.3060052204107569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6894158475","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31474102,0.00021434344,0.00084226794,0.00032935076,0.00016076717,0.0007579513,0.0002977415,0.00004039659,0.6826162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97428304,0.0028306013,0.0045600557,0.0000043777004,0.000051171137,0.0000011780514,0.0008359675,0.0000142431845,0.01741936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953793,0.0019929693,0.00022964687,0.0005348718,0.0012889534,0.000574209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99778247,0.0007276068,0.000374827,0.00030327897,0.0006206944,0.0001911171],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020352707,0.00020009787,0.000555662,0.001523984,0.0037314582,0.000014326545,0.0016266163,0.00023800564,0.001244446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018354288,0.00027776833,0.0002602796,0.0018372438,0.0021246306,0.00036109885,0.00056273036,0.0010684269,0.0000033270746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010214298,0.0004307386,0.0068764915,0.00015536122,0.00023459557,0.000103863844,0.039383784,0.000027471166,0.00077036273,0.9392822,0.0014542608,0.010259444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009182442,0.0003221492,0.050423253,0.00025027673,0.0001035557,4.8516733e-7,0.19430761,0.000031610587,0.00007997276,0.11651032,0.6366465,0.0004060466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11518583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30176216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8227719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006212307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011612362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6898998839","doi":"10.58079/qt0r","title":"Book : Law Reform in Plural Societies","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OpenEdition (OpenEdition)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plural; Law reform; Reform Act; Public law","score_opus":0.029715568955934694,"score_gpt":0.29663847266674404,"score_spread":0.26692290371080934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6898998839","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022956643,0.0010451033,0.000027340118,0.15455641,0.0013536057,0.00033930637,0.00006287192,0.00007332028,0.8402464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.942593,0.0011204979,0.00009172014,0.046129994,0.0012242794,0.00019803231,0.00007385197,0.000009902675,0.008558727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982453,0.000090905705,0.00030352024,0.00031125307,0.0006176424,0.00043138923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911445,0.00006211246,0.00020600439,0.00027717973,0.00020897944,0.00013127804],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060886255,0.00016698013,0.00024819738,0.000053136737,0.005083908,0.00047589795,0.0005779458,0.00014276525,0.002514839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016961854,0.00016144058,0.000114400114,0.00009842575,0.0018479961,0.012591623,0.0001953944,0.00019897254,0.00082890136],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022877124,0.000057508267,0.0003151272,0.0000046541068,0.000016286078,0.00001525489,0.00052777684,0.000002634113,0.000014843535,0.97568226,0.022754636,0.0005861525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058599026,0.00004163701,0.046789806,0.00010256759,0.000015983933,0.0000022348393,0.002546978,0.000003617002,0.00018244213,0.066357344,0.8830754,0.0002959907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016637892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.112877645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9402973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051388337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023471158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6906082455","doi":"10.15468/dl.remdxq","title":"Occurrence Download","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Global Biodiversity Information Facility","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Matching (statistics); Range (aeronautics); Identification (biology)","score_opus":0.019509517739783173,"score_gpt":0.25679506607906827,"score_spread":0.23728554833928509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6906082455","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000027927266,0.00006483001,0.000002537341,0.00095448864,0.0009993309,0.00024425116,0.98788226,0.00007296116,0.009751439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000027570433,0.00042615688,4.117073e-7,0.00080012396,0.000004153257,0.0000037222899,0.9987373,1.5282379e-9,5.765837e-7],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869114,0.00008685827,0.00024379446,0.00015172911,0.0005595484,0.0002669529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915767,0.000034712455,0.00015241548,0.00018400858,0.00036455225,0.00010664315],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003132382,0.00016152194,0.00020820856,0.00006117666,0.0014946396,0.00013010461,0.00046148174,0.0002747584,0.0009811838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045957038,0.00016962181,0.00012523991,0.00042321943,0.00075623015,0.0005909196,0.00027359618,0.00018289224,0.026953146],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017039934,0.000019827015,0.0007434374,0.000029451036,0.00003066963,8.186862e-7,0.00014051283,0.0000010921129,9.292196e-10,0.000032315205,0.9977,0.0012848643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011209743,0.0000071257696,0.000050179468,0.00000390259,0.000043808206,1.5361995e-7,0.0008346449,3.5408825e-9,8.843431e-8,0.000022015824,0.9987618,0.00016417899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024491757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011510978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025971962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000469223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079744594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6908272995","doi":"10.25909/28891115","title":"NO AMENDMENT? NO PROBLEM: JUDGES, “INFORMAL AMENDMENT,” AND THE EVOLUTION OF CONSTITUTIONAL MEANING IN THE FEDERAL DEMOCRACIES OF AUSTRALIA, CANADA, INDIA, AND THE UNITED STATES","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The University of Adelaide","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Democracy; Meaning (existential); Original meaning; Politics; Ideal (ethics)","score_opus":0.012017315651333514,"score_gpt":0.22089195043704304,"score_spread":0.20887463478570953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6908272995","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91071063,0.0004552786,0.00013702073,0.013245826,0.00008157563,0.0005832582,0.00007063861,0.0000060594016,0.074709706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987781,0.00038760033,0.00003108882,0.00016282377,0.000011091248,8.389819e-7,0.000004997306,5.130371e-7,0.00062295375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914104,0.00022987596,0.0001503981,0.000068491674,0.00027818992,0.00013198858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910486,0.00052848406,0.0001424055,0.00006218734,0.00014691825,0.000015118675],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000806141,0.00006430435,0.00014808978,0.00004645992,0.0011590426,0.000013213263,0.00024452579,0.000026365746,0.000018057064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000090688074,0.000035084293,0.000031566935,0.00026042192,0.007829469,0.00010124729,0.00011292645,0.00011730639,5.167884e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031162263,0.0000132106015,0.012505138,0.000013705816,0.00008531949,9.211457e-7,0.014493031,0.00028263076,0.000009460737,0.97113335,0.0011180226,0.000033598968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009643281,0.00014068685,0.09951262,0.0004566625,0.0005177318,0.000007326,0.64688766,0.0006292282,0.00006881955,0.17372555,0.06806724,0.00034321225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83026755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5012294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7974078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011367344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004664918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99487066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6925102727","doi":"10.17632/9cfcs73jm6.1","title":"Investigating the Association between Season of Birth and Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety in Adults","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Mendeley Data","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Season of birth; Anxiety; Depression (economics); Mental health; Association (psychology); Young adult","score_opus":0.027602691913719595,"score_gpt":0.3041274924178348,"score_spread":0.2765248005041152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6925102727","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019972371,0.0017583378,0.0000013639918,0.00036413976,0.000074499156,0.00021336673,0.9771331,0.0000050372973,0.00047780955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1948295,0.007440253,0.000043731623,0.00007146427,0.00020218643,0.000011922094,0.79737014,0.0000024209344,0.000028407054],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879634,0.00019989756,0.00024690432,0.00024736355,0.0003760239,0.00013345332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989144,0.0004344187,0.00030321116,0.00025157648,0.0000648411,0.000031523075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010832828,0.00009199361,0.000256801,0.0000482247,0.0002471423,0.000018807523,0.00040225743,0.00014606054,0.00000391626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001395611,0.00006901132,0.0000133983185,0.00023973582,0.00034085903,0.00012188289,0.0007126288,0.0001764235,1.4107752e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065962545,0.000017618197,0.56054026,0.00016614661,0.00009023753,2.0119052e-7,0.0006229863,4.4198578e-7,0.0000015429346,0.0007321396,0.42335263,0.014469197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038663938,0.000027498887,0.14153062,0.0013773161,0.00016689627,9.3459995e-8,0.0013055145,0.00001580991,0.000007069563,0.0016813645,0.8533416,0.0001595913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036152393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021805525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42998895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048939866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021869963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6930745473","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.14956241","title":"Ethics and professional Responsibility for a judge","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Professional responsibility; Legal ethics; Professional conduct; Judicial independence; Independence (probability theory); Ethical code; Professional ethics; Judicial opinion","score_opus":0.08197097784908297,"score_gpt":0.364674383478536,"score_spread":0.282703405629453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6930745473","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02231363,0.0011641616,0.00044339563,0.010074612,0.0014552061,0.0023089792,0.0011105388,0.00073889375,0.96039057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84288603,0.0027324904,0.00060814014,0.0012474254,0.0015063118,0.0000021031626,0.016075209,0.0012707792,0.13367154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782324,0.00076709484,0.00022385619,0.00041724503,0.00048132567,0.0002872113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99790865,0.00031718207,0.000112133486,0.00015766997,0.0013961614,0.000108228916],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002496808,0.00013240652,0.00018487801,0.00015707308,0.012130587,0.00036953329,0.00047489698,0.00026997714,0.0013147241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008674751,0.00013738136,0.000064496344,0.00035495413,0.00038540972,0.0001175963,0.00030246153,0.0005971888,0.00021638109],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006810061,0.00015738355,0.000005856019,0.00036103113,0.000106281856,0.0000029681378,0.028149659,0.0000011106491,0.0002102211,0.6924425,0.18452737,0.093354665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022074509,0.00005671092,0.00092386926,0.00014143574,0.000031805874,9.984035e-7,0.0073017213,0.00000522775,0.00002267823,0.016936056,0.9742138,0.00014498357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003162615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016445843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82671905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016973814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011645489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6931709741","doi":"10.5683/sp3/8hvbss","title":"Labour Force Survey, February 2024 [Canada] [Rebased 2025]","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Borealis","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unemployment; Earnings; Government (linguistics); Wage; Current Population Survey; Public use; Duration (music); Survey data collection","score_opus":0.02851245371137181,"score_gpt":0.296443538620598,"score_spread":0.26793108490922624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6931709741","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000008853546,0.002742104,0.0000010617614,0.0026284037,0.0021273345,0.0002176682,0.96191776,0.000049250997,0.030307539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00019446596,0.002095703,0.0000037855032,0.0013680476,0.0016133521,0.000041009604,0.9894979,0.000012163901,0.0051735644],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976059,0.00024938345,0.0002859385,0.0004229596,0.0009571529,0.00047864404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889183,0.00034069372,0.000096428164,0.00028559822,0.00019963435,0.0001858107],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073416834,0.00027052787,0.00037604145,0.000086128704,0.0007748679,0.0001487285,0.00055556715,0.00025483832,0.000840638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006156587,0.0002481315,0.000118114076,0.0004772917,0.00045169692,0.000065357024,0.00018359518,0.0003975082,0.0003440074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010095897,0.000017148157,0.0001328555,0.000036076483,0.0001253918,0.00011667765,0.000043271706,7.478915e-7,6.6027084e-8,0.008402192,0.99096006,0.0001554328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056655805,0.000011419762,0.008651589,0.00008595515,0.00008801397,7.120361e-7,0.0002581828,2.1167556e-7,3.2196178e-7,0.0037247345,0.98681885,0.00030333095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9997816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99993324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027580123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004015507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004363315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6949870997","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.7875135","title":"FIGURES 73–78 in Morphological and molecular characterization of twenty-five new Diploneis species (Bacillariophyta) from Lake Tanganyika and its surrounding areas","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Museum of Nature","funders":"","keywords":"Holotype; Scale (ratio); Characterization (materials science); Single specimen; Morphology (biology)","score_opus":0.04273538230748023,"score_gpt":0.25965323922320643,"score_spread":0.2169178569157262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6949870997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17239366,0.0028170059,0.0005256634,0.002335363,0.0004552908,0.0013175603,0.002969799,0.0013019415,0.8158837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8674942,0.015410468,0.0000990902,0.00018872574,0.0010653927,3.198953e-7,0.0026271488,0.0030958282,0.11001879],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986765,0.00023311969,0.00018021704,0.00033137758,0.000356169,0.00022264548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994877,0.00004079435,0.00013943684,0.00009770598,0.00012776181,0.00010657677],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002735069,0.00013642159,0.00024032082,0.0002084969,0.0007025149,0.00021304651,0.00026676725,0.00013760783,0.0039919596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008098897,0.00014016521,0.000029359839,0.00041989793,0.00039266516,0.000101216516,0.00047253823,0.00015750465,0.00028434792],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032568962,0.0004978388,0.002639577,0.0003730113,0.00087172544,0.00061452604,0.0313666,0.000010055125,0.061749004,0.37991056,0.44891623,0.07272519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002436183,0.000042294087,0.01255383,0.00019718059,0.000020697262,0.0000037516381,0.0006609402,0.0000049088258,0.00006297992,0.0007830023,0.98525167,0.00017516184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018942872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051425945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7058649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006387528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011022486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6950146855","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.16810296","title":"JUDGING THE JUDGES: REVIEWING THE 2025 JUDICIAL EXPERIENCE MANDATE AMID PERSISTING COMPETENCY GAPS AND JUDICIAL ERRORS IN THE INDIAN JUDICIARY","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Competence (human resources); Mandate; Supreme court; Jurisdiction; Judicial activism; CLARITY; Accountability; Judicial discretion","score_opus":0.058125023407734365,"score_gpt":0.3105647216076861,"score_spread":0.25243969819995177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6950146855","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26644826,0.00471631,0.00026752398,0.064580545,0.00055161037,0.0015987323,0.000047448255,0.00032721498,0.66146237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99580264,0.0016245866,0.00001534924,0.0020787755,0.00030217122,5.563982e-7,0.00002903488,0.00006801238,0.00007885586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973997,0.0010635107,0.00029102442,0.00031862882,0.0005022388,0.00042489183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914825,0.0002210992,0.00010593097,0.0002460789,0.00022514994,0.00005351316],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027172065,0.00013148927,0.00016624981,0.00012691633,0.014235986,0.0006523809,0.001257843,0.000048846843,0.00052897795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021016928,0.0000850307,0.000057271995,0.0012695767,0.0016838347,0.00021278959,0.00082726026,0.00041943885,0.00018887527],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007955332,0.0001376766,0.0021861806,0.00006985066,0.00011244817,0.00004975725,0.2636755,0.0000397952,0.00022002238,0.5531968,0.052445717,0.12778671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024285201,0.00003594389,0.020307088,0.00022782518,0.00003873719,0.000013338265,0.10560601,0.000039727678,0.0000070263413,0.00811074,0.86520374,0.00016699328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002274284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027455075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81275797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013770975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034522098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9870473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6964785658","doi":"10.25949/19435487.v1","title":"Legal and political protections of fundamental rights: strengths and weaknesses : a comparative study","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fundamental rights; Legislation; Legislature; Judicial review; Charter; Politics; Human rights; Strengths and weaknesses; Constitutional review","score_opus":0.048361334189488216,"score_gpt":0.36803899222675895,"score_spread":0.3196776580372707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6964785658","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2569591,0.002478298,1.4894255e-7,0.00065037067,0.00030837266,0.0032841624,0.18237199,0.00012574701,0.5538218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99295604,0.0000053502467,0.0000043783944,0.000010726267,0.00015360693,0.00020641481,0.006396487,0.0000031003738,0.0002638708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992142,0.000065913606,0.00014375603,0.00019417744,0.00024185439,0.00014015054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948704,0.00017265767,0.00008114213,0.000031338146,0.0001356494,0.00009218232],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000021301023,0.000116172996,0.00024215733,0.000036488247,0.0006837123,0.000059974154,0.00006423163,0.00007396709,0.004910219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036876675,0.00010377624,0.00003108327,0.00012894577,0.000093615396,0.0000955551,0.000036571837,0.00014439928,0.00002522573],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036181664,0.0013219882,0.0020562655,0.0008349225,0.0011617012,0.00006735922,0.16885306,5.536425e-7,0.00003664035,0.7832406,0.039417807,0.0026472672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007056637,0.0006456552,0.06635073,0.001988239,0.00021446456,0.0000027246388,0.48782697,0.0000055550827,0.000160028,0.0071847374,0.43430755,0.000607694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053738584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03335939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7760559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032193497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026030437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99599946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6977394580","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.7841156","title":"JUDICIALIZAÇÃO E ATIVISMO JUDICIAL EM PERSPECTIVA: UMA ANÁLISE A PARTIR DAS EXPERIÊNCIAS DAS SUPREMAS CORTES DO BRASIL E DO CANADÁ","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Supreme court; Legislature; Judicial activism; Scope (computer science); Portuguese; Judicial opinion; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.046239730608450665,"score_gpt":0.3303817744928082,"score_spread":0.28414204388435754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6977394580","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4014389,0.008421665,0.000003891448,0.0027366711,0.0020506743,0.0022885748,0.056436956,0.00072266674,0.5259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949641,0.00005857659,0.000015788972,0.0006749165,0.001483973,0.00021983235,0.0020169234,0.000030080126,0.00053580303],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996869,0.00018785612,0.0003726337,0.0006762059,0.0010469632,0.00084729114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983747,0.0002997622,0.0002099263,0.00032441772,0.0004706136,0.00032060087],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019645422,0.00034391682,0.0005090772,0.000115032075,0.0014944203,0.00028754454,0.0005550984,0.00022908946,0.11806653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019825734,0.0003394503,0.00022572489,0.00070952997,0.00021587085,0.0004442733,0.00025237855,0.00028170427,0.003367242],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013230788,0.00031135726,0.02866195,0.00007034724,0.0002969657,0.00015917729,0.08310301,0.00002405389,0.0001229188,0.098780885,0.78026086,0.008076142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011343961,0.00020254495,0.079246,0.0017519081,0.00008631813,0.000009613041,0.07930188,0.000032262622,0.00022803684,0.015158643,0.82135296,0.0014954312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022436207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0436046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59352523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044649217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011474688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6980341073","doi":"","title":"Bypassing the Judge: A Manifestation of the Legitimacy Crisis of Judicial Review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship (California Digital Library)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Judicial review; Distrust; Opposition (politics); Judicial activism; Politics; Sovereignty; Democracy; Rule of law","score_opus":0.019134660596205257,"score_gpt":0.2738816842365844,"score_spread":0.2547470236403791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6980341073","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08059124,0.018906891,0.00018627463,0.10189866,0.00074253965,0.0013232899,0.0011645424,0.00013756918,0.795049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99563205,0.000990956,0.000030761577,0.0028632288,0.00010016206,0.000018113102,0.000015258864,0.000006573425,0.0003429208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985793,0.00019369135,0.00041134516,0.0001600952,0.0004568219,0.00019871196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918467,0.00026078548,0.0002134442,0.000190458,0.00011090702,0.0000397369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036718376,0.000111885616,0.00022588635,0.00004616119,0.00067077274,0.0001716473,0.00052570365,0.000052750787,0.00010595437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009190912,0.00006880698,0.00020111512,0.00094884663,0.0007996535,0.0009419084,0.00021068774,0.00018411578,0.000039298804],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053567157,0.0001723867,0.06661294,0.0003355016,0.00013363487,0.0000026909368,0.000392351,0.0000030599174,0.00003497516,0.85577,0.05219019,0.024298692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024454936,0.000021102474,0.03096591,0.0021471868,0.00015066807,0.0000010152092,0.0011765027,0.0000027227338,0.0007016565,0.26649368,0.69789684,0.00019818918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002905702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000055178683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9150408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028372226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004963423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5159109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6982061401","doi":"","title":"God's Lake, Manitoba","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Saint Mary's University Institutional Repository (Saint Mary's University)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identification (biology); Natural (archaeology); Work (physics); Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.0170124527344129,"score_gpt":0.1984489225508419,"score_spread":0.181436469816429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6982061401","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00077045587,0.00048733826,0.00069940835,0.00064643344,0.0028470748,0.00076111994,0.00039903587,0.00084253104,0.9925466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027238723,0.0024361848,0.00064514764,0.00022217767,0.0018595193,0.0000014598495,0.00025234115,0.00012586954,0.9672186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995753,0.0006049395,0.0003335056,0.0011448393,0.0012200004,0.00094375055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99772954,0.0001503125,0.0005064617,0.0005713849,0.00042648864,0.0006158172],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034548718,0.00072868186,0.00077503134,0.0015131712,0.004323083,0.000092455775,0.0015763105,0.00094306265,0.0036386456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000101577425,0.0009092471,0.000606542,0.0012708574,0.0045511974,0.0005745589,0.0008509243,0.0008059997,0.00093640806],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002701158,0.0003562028,0.0025789987,0.000052933086,0.0006548725,0.0051071118,0.00040814857,0.00002172136,0.000008545759,0.83847106,0.15100978,0.0010605366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079711666,0.0000902303,0.0015580332,0.00036150738,0.0003875481,0.000041859712,0.0031801192,0.0000022650502,0.000005970774,0.001048074,0.99151754,0.0010097028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14876892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.115826756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8405078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050044996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028075168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6983202146","doi":"","title":"Making sense of who we are: justification, community and judgment in section 7 of the canadian charter","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Charter; Adjudication; Constitutional theory; Constitutional law; Normative; Obligation; Argument (complex analysis); Equal Protection Clause; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.05222647893363846,"score_gpt":0.2871791781056263,"score_spread":0.23495269917198786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6983202146","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89495414,0.00027622358,1.774476e-8,0.0002516313,0.0009749841,0.00048777953,0.0003263469,0.000012634232,0.10271624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983689,0.0003696555,0.000007943612,0.000115851326,0.00003243159,0.000026873951,0.000031111445,0.000014436841,0.0010327547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978683,0.0006588133,0.0004509197,0.00023932024,0.00050589006,0.00027678427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855834,0.00016781702,0.00051012414,0.00027547704,0.00040577332,0.000082484665],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011975392,0.00019648045,0.0003715243,0.00021227825,0.002472239,0.000027748078,0.00027036195,0.0003450875,0.000028114811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005061562,0.00018101676,0.000101509504,0.00049520587,0.00031510534,0.0001891912,0.00005656966,0.0008076128,0.0000067738133],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012167316,0.00019797303,0.012253579,0.00059630885,0.00021420475,0.0000053133044,0.0028759537,0.00003952565,0.0039254753,0.9464203,0.000024989882,0.033324677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00090540136,0.000101965634,0.76817983,0.004388078,0.00034450405,0.000005452561,0.048322324,0.0000103602515,0.006337628,0.0744203,0.09591414,0.0010700326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49589324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96781147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87200004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073648366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002638267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6984767347","doi":"","title":"President’s Column","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Association (psychology); Curse; Energy (signal processing); Appeal","score_opus":0.05492148165875414,"score_gpt":0.23027678776085644,"score_spread":0.17535530610210232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6984767347","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21112849,0.00020076634,0.0003575669,0.0011226193,0.00023397183,0.00015575982,0.0000108460945,0.00006292265,0.7867271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931099,0.0001454698,0.00077671336,0.00005430933,0.00007424108,1.7413555e-7,8.288427e-7,0.0000016701796,0.0058367024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994417,0.000046582998,0.000050897135,0.00011095302,0.00021182116,0.00013805758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967366,0.00003593708,0.00005646085,0.00006515213,0.000099768295,0.00006903547],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013539453,0.00004275105,0.00010141144,0.000044613076,0.0006713895,0.000004945851,0.00023141675,0.00005410784,0.0011437036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035830715,0.000055814813,0.00006270164,0.00019448265,0.0007097578,0.00016477733,0.000084608866,0.000046998823,0.00012134929],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008464554,0.00019418553,0.07161438,0.000008424183,0.000095414485,0.000047338377,0.044508144,0.0000018191736,0.000053856224,0.8628379,0.01290658,0.0076472918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053627614,0.00009705987,0.5440487,0.000038560367,0.000071563634,8.21046e-7,0.05919054,0.00000771145,0.000040923667,0.0656268,0.33009762,0.00024338764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0673314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04469874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7972111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003937557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017517594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6985111866","doi":"","title":"9781040016657.pdf","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OAPEN (The OAPEN Foundation)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Reading (process); Institution; Politics; Analytics; Perspective (graphical); Work (physics); Empirical legal studies","score_opus":0.027636981050615732,"score_gpt":0.31883330081033656,"score_spread":0.2911963197597208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6985111866","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000025113293,0.00006114145,0.00006509342,0.010331877,0.0026562957,0.00050998013,2.5337291e-8,0.0002954507,0.9860776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002073109,0.00092507736,0.00007667155,0.0006387059,0.0042967815,0.00010970419,0.000059417995,0.00014979207,0.9916707],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981865,0.00014426948,0.00023211185,0.00040037377,0.0006710075,0.0003657362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999299,0.00011179668,0.00015926409,0.00026987214,0.00007253738,0.00008752313],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004816954,0.00025100863,0.00027488713,0.00012241675,0.0008854641,0.00037760864,0.0005921491,0.00018092379,0.8440764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014102638,0.00018653487,0.0001614921,0.00044076095,0.0010526036,0.00011903667,0.00017742052,0.00028588448,0.9868777],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029389776,0.0000126866435,0.000031766158,0.00001130624,0.0001500601,0.0000063819825,0.00042692566,1.9833026e-7,8.949044e-7,0.2561558,0.03670727,0.7064938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006988387,0.000007547736,0.000064777436,0.00013200124,0.00011678439,0.0000014785746,0.00061509816,7.831977e-7,6.019692e-7,0.041769825,0.95697594,0.00024527384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016120559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015525742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92026865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016773758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004738285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9904312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987185096","doi":"","title":"Seeking the Court's Advice: The Politics of the Canadian Reference Power","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Power (physics); Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.028182442781601955,"score_gpt":0.2705308502511159,"score_spread":0.24234840746951394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987185096","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03580323,0.0010308019,0.0000060032753,0.23026064,0.0005229815,0.00029555595,0.00005724164,0.00004046386,0.73198307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98482674,0.00003664474,0.00001046095,0.014084291,0.00039590878,0.00000784349,6.861991e-7,0.000003886064,0.0006335524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879384,0.0001704503,0.00014595588,0.00012462944,0.00045336538,0.0003117413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927247,0.00015416236,0.00007134279,0.0001740162,0.00015550434,0.00017251457],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036260622,0.000080287275,0.0001017289,0.0000068831305,0.0036031047,0.00008697713,0.000668705,0.00005924899,0.00024472916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043509912,0.000040272047,0.00006746561,0.00029078228,0.001379405,0.000075831755,0.00010238751,0.00029068236,0.000092071255],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016928406,0.0000036989568,0.0050712707,0.0000013416494,0.000018613515,0.0000010414153,0.0035191937,0.000007476789,0.000011011472,0.9842519,0.0070653083,0.00004741301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059592912,0.0000109165385,0.016576506,0.00001952668,0.000021824544,5.061836e-7,0.007191471,0.0000074481645,0.00001823798,0.02283578,0.9531784,0.00007976563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75204515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9060664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9614162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011066524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009876753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989548983","doi":"","title":"Bench Strength: How Powerful Are Supreme Courts in Common Law Countries Really?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syracuse University Libraries (Syracuse University)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Typology; Supreme court; Judicial review; Common law; Enforcement; Judicial independence; Power (physics); Constitutional review","score_opus":0.011734448479655997,"score_gpt":0.2097868470120489,"score_spread":0.1980523985323929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989548983","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33453158,0.00043914688,0.00014921682,0.030880285,0.00076964084,0.0006155747,0.00033908992,0.0005019383,0.63177353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96800184,0.0013088459,0.0001673599,0.00064697897,0.00009574871,2.548893e-7,0.000040995645,0.000012269812,0.029725695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974442,0.0004409429,0.00020905524,0.0006169987,0.00054926425,0.00073950755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99833703,0.0005402061,0.00020935368,0.0003746034,0.00030026067,0.00023854412],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002782403,0.0003496588,0.0005729833,0.00086017675,0.0026065065,0.00028152615,0.0010995743,0.0003541229,0.00020663698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010765103,0.00042910108,0.00019125795,0.0018806927,0.0030801147,0.002836083,0.0006763967,0.00046758642,0.000046110057],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031476075,0.00016877743,0.04504172,0.000021676513,0.00013973548,0.0007020695,0.004043569,0.000018452007,0.0000067072715,0.94046074,0.008965751,0.00011605278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012087735,0.000040280218,0.008356322,0.00018176936,0.00012822503,0.0000010059957,0.053746846,0.000008816843,0.000067714165,0.017863998,0.91792834,0.00046788808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018701082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.100291185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92259675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008009779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010993511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989963950","doi":"","title":"Charter Decisions in the McLachlin Era: Collegiality and Ideology at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Voting; Ideology; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice","score_opus":0.024704683993240623,"score_gpt":0.2621653411425994,"score_spread":0.23746065714935874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989963950","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79240465,0.00034673073,0.000021319442,0.035475973,0.00012304235,0.00012427516,0.000017125107,0.000002910601,0.17148396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998379,0.00021584032,0.000025369149,0.00015411577,0.000045377226,1.6498647e-7,4.4447103e-7,6.366167e-7,0.0011790822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938697,0.0001427032,0.000048679296,0.000083200786,0.00021477499,0.0001236698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994711,0.0002678966,0.00005107642,0.00008687544,0.00009517084,0.000027870965],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041337562,0.000039900595,0.00010977704,0.000006335013,0.00088950177,0.0000026562072,0.00020718474,0.000033138498,0.0015747005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000086110485,0.000028916676,0.000023687237,0.000057445424,0.0016199525,0.00006803118,0.00009921994,0.000037729613,0.0000015978749],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043534432,0.00013763296,0.12393992,0.0000071315735,0.00016893036,0.00002398606,0.34863064,0.0000035100359,0.00024380274,0.406695,0.109220915,0.01049319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021142984,0.000032657266,0.8585731,0.0000075031207,0.0000169148,6.01388e-7,0.09853776,0.0000074184736,0.0000042776123,0.0008449024,0.0417189,0.000044580083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99343306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73463315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018876673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003614256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6990320469","doi":"","title":"Decoding the Court: Legal Data Insights from the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"BiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Politics; Analytics; Empirical legal studies; Reading (process); Jurisprudence; Legal research; Judicial review","score_opus":0.12742231598425657,"score_gpt":0.3487191286813308,"score_spread":0.22129681269707424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6990320469","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015078354,0.033022583,0.0000016327206,0.11545037,0.0011496574,0.0015641672,0.0075688716,0.000112763984,0.84097916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018338066,0.023813643,0.00016139634,0.004149577,0.0060878885,0.00017282952,0.009199497,0.00017985415,0.93789726],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99223197,0.0013062459,0.0007902586,0.0011579359,0.0034493655,0.0010642525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99200886,0.005070613,0.0002685591,0.0020550673,0.00018272888,0.00041417312],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015179153,0.0004760676,0.0007464456,0.0010589228,0.0035513553,0.003952962,0.01533611,0.0003623507,0.0026760588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000547184,0.00028555072,0.00017404025,0.0056863655,0.00429252,0.00793212,0.015685977,0.0021470583,0.0002684518],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005130227,0.000019929916,0.00022080497,0.000022004971,0.00025474007,0.00013850184,0.00037099124,5.7798644e-7,9.827161e-7,0.37703082,0.6214997,0.00038963367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013835615,0.000032736945,0.00057356973,0.00046031727,0.00006434866,0.0000015578445,0.0011899923,0.000012534422,0.000025089916,0.13452458,0.86265504,0.0003218803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7232957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64059025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24250624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017223756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04943333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6991696867","doi":"","title":"Ian Mulgrew: New data shows the need for legal reform in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Legislation; Work (physics); Legislature","score_opus":0.052444768299588176,"score_gpt":0.2836835375027224,"score_spread":0.23123876920313424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6991696867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02916142,0.002612283,0.00018481768,0.45291427,0.0016232458,0.0013165302,0.00049977144,0.00010507659,0.51158255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863186,0.000039766583,0.00014037493,0.011401343,0.0012564305,0.000017850143,0.000022873432,0.0000055290707,0.00079722545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988738,0.00004484268,0.00017907993,0.0002373302,0.00034234067,0.00032264495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994138,0.00007930667,0.00004460978,0.0002011345,0.000041592237,0.000219552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026895208,0.00009137058,0.00015062261,0.000007839904,0.0007364232,0.00007903511,0.0007481736,0.000038007423,0.00018434146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035378008,0.000066775836,0.000033391236,0.00023257453,0.0001976181,0.00029415337,0.00018803531,0.00016740018,0.000032741726],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046535944,0.000010618981,0.0035419143,0.00000514129,0.000033281678,0.000012432244,0.0011978274,0.000015491427,0.000016807233,0.85784364,0.13331643,0.00395986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026355797,0.000012794077,0.0012445985,0.000010445706,0.0000109092025,2.8034376e-7,0.007535809,0.0000678428,0.000010867453,0.004356723,0.9863733,0.00011286307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99766755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99974614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9571572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046080348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032433537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.575357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6991963703","doi":"","title":"Introduction, Symposium: The Evolution of Justice Anthony M. Kennedyâs Jurisprudence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly Commons (University of the Pacific)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Economic Justice; State (computer science); State supreme court; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.012689970900866057,"score_gpt":0.21577192095283382,"score_spread":0.20308195005196777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6991963703","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53193057,0.000964547,0.0018934328,0.23765999,0.0016851426,0.0007014175,0.000045056335,0.00007230559,0.22504754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972521,0.00017297392,0.00012230138,0.000020537793,0.00018540701,6.045024e-7,6.326248e-7,0.0000022374236,0.0022432064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988343,0.00032842252,0.00010871373,0.00014481836,0.0004103975,0.0001733368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987941,0.00014305144,0.00016770621,0.0003107421,0.0005363306,0.00004807611],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058867765,0.0000717425,0.00012968772,0.000054389053,0.002777349,0.000057608922,0.00081000023,0.00006467976,0.00017601003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023627948,0.000054910364,0.00011200487,0.00067653495,0.0020444694,0.0009623542,0.0002288378,0.00023658983,0.00008069048],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039001516,0.00015380877,0.04174148,0.000018332661,0.00011822826,7.5611206e-7,0.020552324,0.000084272324,0.005655849,0.8731148,0.057550527,0.00097059365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036797987,0.00007496562,0.34466493,0.000085346655,0.000434915,0.0000039836063,0.36608756,0.000055296518,0.00018412051,0.06592,0.22182363,0.0002972802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03783902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005911288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8071948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016051576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020205081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6992281934","doi":"","title":"Law, ideology, and collegiality judicial behaviour in the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Collegiality; Work (physics); Judicial independence; Legislation","score_opus":0.03021138814584164,"score_gpt":0.28977026525364596,"score_spread":0.25955887710780434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6992281934","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6386868,0.0002859792,0.0000037601653,0.008817552,0.00030166013,0.00011573332,0.000010195184,0.000004497684,0.35177386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988135,0.000016524285,0.000011438656,0.0009094719,0.0001476393,0.0000055290516,4.4651614e-7,6.761097e-7,0.00009475876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993358,0.00011109842,0.00010263409,0.00005016552,0.00021334225,0.00018695835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973404,0.00012984699,0.000025536185,0.00003493462,0.000038513906,0.000037102538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007144093,0.000036282654,0.000090832975,0.000008084261,0.00037828973,0.0000049310775,0.00008498553,0.000030089537,0.000057690617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000085947664,0.000025058009,0.0000120664,0.000097388925,0.00078539003,0.000057475245,0.00002819992,0.000046572746,5.670957e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000255759,0.000018550472,0.33193645,4.131608e-7,0.0000029679497,6.141139e-7,0.0017095899,8.383795e-8,0.0000018414931,0.6624131,0.0038844862,0.000029300883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013556566,0.000010344876,0.9237869,0.000003298599,0.000013862859,8.863156e-7,0.019451618,3.714004e-7,0.000016592352,0.017207379,0.03930556,0.0000676658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9863233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64520574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043076347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040363596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2909537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6992510589","doi":"","title":"Lolita Buckner Inniss to become dean of Colorado Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Work (physics); Feminist legal theory; Legal profession; Feminist theory; Feminism","score_opus":0.025067882242123366,"score_gpt":0.29370746923636143,"score_spread":0.26863958699423807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6992510589","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3127597,0.0011743631,0.00004357718,0.012163465,0.0007935743,0.00021921056,0.000051672458,0.00007774587,0.6727167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927042,0.000056917175,0.00038404705,0.0038503576,0.00044650215,0.000018549334,0.0000055212777,0.000006733663,0.0025271536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860215,0.00012497057,0.00024195523,0.00024560824,0.00045027034,0.00033505837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910545,0.00010948773,0.000055093587,0.00017366196,0.0003193211,0.00023698862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034406863,0.00010737059,0.00024933624,0.000024085359,0.0007698476,0.00005717188,0.00024341371,0.00008586324,0.00075180264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027836146,0.00010655734,0.00009465243,0.000447808,0.00068877626,0.0001659356,0.00016486562,0.00012984998,0.000479969],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001111314,0.00006134279,0.004461831,0.000005534303,0.00003439491,0.000018577251,0.00073956547,0.0000060349284,0.00032301334,0.991452,0.0026491275,0.00023746284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021190096,0.000041104115,0.006492584,0.00004444666,0.000025740688,0.0000014935156,0.002421856,3.6468467e-7,0.0013612147,0.07091656,0.91828454,0.00019819879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06237939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15579186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92053545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010276505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003045133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9438643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6995673828","doi":"","title":"Practice, Principle, and Prerogative","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Portal (King's College London)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.06969430355157623,"score_gpt":0.43259389034346224,"score_spread":0.362899586791886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6995673828","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03959295,0.008584904,0.000024635976,0.0130018685,0.00045877308,0.0008385921,0.00006367876,0.00017900718,0.93725556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98771685,0.0024670826,0.00017461993,0.0001300533,0.00065494026,0.00010937547,0.0000042159554,0.000012001894,0.00873086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99685514,0.0004360557,0.00021615431,0.0004221956,0.0014280567,0.0006423853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976206,0.0014685969,0.00003691831,0.000120476136,0.00052026374,0.00023316883],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030035942,0.00012291875,0.00017745994,0.00021161219,0.0018816276,0.0002874261,0.000213686,0.00010061057,0.00033509976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002730686,0.00010952864,0.00006309273,0.0012681475,0.001804283,0.00070079265,0.00027301375,0.0005081406,0.00021793859],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039300325,0.000055350672,0.0014446956,0.000024723886,0.00010239633,0.00066178397,0.0030177447,7.447114e-7,0.000024401557,0.9847217,0.0071998923,0.0027072206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015976788,0.000099929355,0.0025728943,0.00015249307,0.00002004539,0.000021663427,0.010950832,0.00003545188,0.00003675221,0.037548203,0.948242,0.00015998984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056710215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00710082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9481239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001324328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012621596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6995677290","doi":"","title":"Packing the Court? Judicial Appointment in the Next Presidential Administration","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Presidential system; Politics; Administrative law; Administration (probate law); Constitutional law; Separation of powers; Judicial review; Dozen","score_opus":0.0492007197137444,"score_gpt":0.2999306938626822,"score_spread":0.2507299741489378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6995677290","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25999984,0.001973885,0.0003102622,0.39685997,0.0011636378,0.0014871669,0.000020913101,0.00014456021,0.33803976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908409,0.000101446494,0.00002199336,0.006884192,0.0020532042,0.000048860482,0.0000034137813,0.0000036246918,0.00004235459],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985289,0.0002802552,0.000199729,0.00017934557,0.0005672529,0.00024451967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955696,0.00015753758,0.000067803085,0.00009361763,0.00004754816,0.000076537974],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059858174,0.000091255315,0.00011086936,0.000009190414,0.0013248816,0.00026961436,0.0003612817,0.000051967076,0.00027896665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028247022,0.000058716065,0.00006784938,0.00022731088,0.00051001465,0.00019609559,0.000058448204,0.00022187887,0.00023871785],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044323402,0.000043262942,0.0016936455,0.000002756499,0.000021041307,0.000019055065,0.0077717276,0.000018442603,0.00004360947,0.980222,0.008926204,0.0011939646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048721122,0.00014723733,0.020859174,0.000039784827,0.000057962134,0.000002426728,0.02605511,0.000025926447,0.00010839801,0.062537014,0.88943,0.00024976226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0154493805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04851964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.917685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005492373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002277894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6995698657","doi":"","title":"Panel I: L’accès à la justice sous la Charte/Access to Justice under the Charter","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Economic Justice; Politics; Class (philosophy); Legislation","score_opus":0.0921098041541939,"score_gpt":0.3099839251516128,"score_spread":0.21787412099741893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6995698657","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8412929,0.00012365697,0.00016938837,0.033969212,0.0006228432,0.00039208055,0.00006854211,0.00022283125,0.123138525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99224585,0.0002849244,0.00003643212,0.0012157338,0.0003380007,0.0000024978083,0.0000091542015,0.0000136869385,0.0058537293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754626,0.0005288883,0.00015663069,0.00039827742,0.00080876687,0.0005612009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982469,0.0008481773,0.00012443839,0.00028068016,0.00025197305,0.00024779455],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016536823,0.00018841786,0.00026256035,0.00020461288,0.0036430324,0.00016268955,0.0012251906,0.00021123681,0.00037250324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034418923,0.0001845485,0.0001697351,0.0013508647,0.0011170194,0.00075282255,0.00068778207,0.00039961783,0.0013065101],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010330603,0.00059697026,0.07734971,0.00032152768,0.0010232431,0.00062590797,0.1460509,0.00097445364,0.0032789763,0.66516846,0.084844396,0.018732388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067434384,0.000049305,0.67669916,0.000094507195,0.0005807468,0.0000075759294,0.06075694,0.000015214012,0.000043273183,0.009766238,0.25088027,0.00043239305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017843456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004003387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65540224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013142095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026842143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99947107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6995760815","doi":"","title":"The Planned Overhaul of Israel’s Judiciary","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Multiculturalism; Economic Justice; Legislature; Government (linguistics); Human rights; Power (physics); Constitutional law","score_opus":0.024505537618747755,"score_gpt":0.2873569362516485,"score_spread":0.26285139863290075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6995760815","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17800415,0.002199052,0.0000070385354,0.01632426,0.0015607484,0.000294573,0.000041673935,0.0002688341,0.8012997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995843,0.0006129075,0.0000108802105,0.0010240402,0.00054446404,0.000020946936,0.000004003157,0.0000053456824,0.0019343962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876446,0.000081973405,0.00019385772,0.00014689985,0.00047752482,0.00033530925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992979,0.00031364063,0.00007173513,0.00013891827,0.00009148486,0.00008628364],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006732459,0.00008110212,0.00014234164,0.000025854035,0.001767784,0.000047555975,0.0003035226,0.00006440045,0.00007811358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003266659,0.000060131766,0.00008647793,0.00046314264,0.000967737,0.000117942254,0.00010409827,0.00012406682,0.00069556246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022707733,0.000013274896,0.0068303063,0.0000018183581,0.000034033794,0.0000065465715,0.00036882365,0.00000556794,0.000039190632,0.9643487,0.027566567,0.0007624869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015932915,0.000031933465,0.026750453,0.00002826462,0.000014104225,3.767051e-7,0.0042432942,0.000003956883,0.00008650151,0.15852177,0.8100475,0.00011249376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033018317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04117082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81783885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043975928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017501556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6996943013","doi":"","title":"Tort Law, Crown Liability, and the Rule of Law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Government (linguistics); Rule of law; Private law; Public law; Delict; Common law; Tort reform; Normative","score_opus":0.008275462525469627,"score_gpt":0.22162801749396552,"score_spread":0.2133525549684959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6996943013","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042594098,0.00021960374,9.021175e-7,0.0423878,0.0004049607,0.00035992856,0.00008666765,0.00008306591,0.913863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77563584,0.0012859245,0.00006395764,0.00040667382,0.00014667284,0.0000033112028,0.00013978875,0.000012814885,0.222305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876606,0.00026520382,0.00011514672,0.00025718153,0.00040552174,0.00019086036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930865,0.0002543606,0.00015312122,0.00014896909,0.000061560415,0.00007335522],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013935944,0.00014392004,0.00029893257,0.000054051634,0.0018478334,0.000050384515,0.0004057692,0.0001338509,0.00091537146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036786587,0.00012987696,0.0001502582,0.0002629616,0.0019211369,0.0005036973,0.00023915284,0.000245093,0.0000059781646],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024835602,0.000033557662,0.0007934616,0.000024465795,0.000068321395,0.000008833303,0.008485776,0.0000012730147,2.9944226e-7,0.9796511,0.010626747,0.000057815203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031366048,0.000024064593,0.0030976764,0.000029634819,0.0000985562,2.9177155e-8,0.028366983,7.928066e-8,0.00004349406,0.030297562,0.9375574,0.00017085012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3489776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016128357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9493535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000070758884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039944437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6996943137","doi":"","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada's Multifactorial Approach to Deference in Judicial Review","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Supreme court; CLARITY; Judicial deference; Judicial review; Standard of review; Judicial activism; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy)","score_opus":0.010423367918749425,"score_gpt":0.2004248225095324,"score_spread":0.19000145459078296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6996943137","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018279856,0.01108751,0.0000028176041,0.0047196103,0.0018077263,0.0006540669,0.00033804044,0.000004242491,0.96310616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99064666,0.0046425057,0.000046709094,0.00048995536,0.0002955524,0.000030568775,0.000030265284,0.00000927045,0.0038085126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964508,0.00012391232,0.00040125006,0.00019434134,0.0024453579,0.00038436908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904704,0.00036777972,0.00024095598,0.000113587645,0.0000039419324,0.00022669115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005574318,0.00018020716,0.00039274374,0.000014817216,0.00055431796,0.000012013565,0.00036223276,0.00004346279,0.000016429287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056024383,0.00014829898,0.00003299172,0.00014217415,0.00014745045,0.00011011503,0.00006228296,0.0001762409,1.81392e-9],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00083693827,0.00008239691,0.020121427,0.0010028852,0.00020794067,0.000013551915,0.0020683103,0.000018696051,0.00039014476,0.9389655,0.01923092,0.017061304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000386942,0.00004754143,0.333307,0.0026319919,0.00013583527,6.8418046e-7,0.034983277,0.00001562862,0.0016416897,0.004174529,0.62188363,0.0007912306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9220977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9723668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004257164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014082015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99150723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6997221238","doi":"","title":"The use of scientific evidence in constitutional rights cases : research on the methods of the American and the Canadian judges","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Research Committee, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki; Amicus Therapeutics; Emory University","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Consequentialism; General interest","score_opus":0.5645017089828909,"score_gpt":0.5116963286610977,"score_spread":0.05280538032179316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6997221238","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5669881,0.006695575,0.00000966542,0.36945227,0.0013948942,0.0007672337,0.00005913882,0.0000029133912,0.05463023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996,0.0009095303,0.000083316096,0.00026522193,0.00008952782,0.000022830298,1.0513522e-7,0.0000012734073,0.0026282065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955019,0.0028186017,0.00024579122,0.00021739151,0.00083329424,0.0003830625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9821697,0.016490765,0.00023260087,0.00050255953,0.00052864425,0.00007575474],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009659627,0.00009392292,0.00019689328,0.000058895734,0.019613076,0.0004924709,0.0010367566,0.00003882886,0.000051582916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011055671,0.000033911427,0.00008440973,0.0006596442,0.20254557,0.00021085997,0.00030866516,0.00031296627,0.0000064533824],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034318615,0.000017346423,0.014583802,0.0000021795547,0.000028905324,0.0000021107571,0.0012261397,0.000010945369,0.0000070682995,0.97667927,0.0024081408,0.004999758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020605266,0.00006353702,0.301655,0.00044864404,0.000048970316,0.0000066238313,0.007890596,0.00014685004,0.00028034582,0.28577363,0.4033428,0.00013691279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9510399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98566544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69090563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017381547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002247152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99727464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6997360440","doi":"","title":"Weak form of judicial review: apontamentos sobre o controle de constitucionalidade no Canadá, Nova Zelândia, Israel e Inglaterra","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Context (archaeology); Judicial review; Focus (optics); Sovereignty; Judicial activism","score_opus":0.01719723834834229,"score_gpt":0.2810840524884779,"score_spread":0.2638868141401356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6997360440","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15575716,0.008265382,0.00031811706,0.004537739,0.00087328634,0.00063343113,0.00015601492,0.000094407354,0.8293645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938346,0.0029588079,0.00018162021,0.0017132175,0.00071357767,0.000011315124,0.000018289891,0.000009926676,0.00055862666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981302,0.00025656045,0.0002459507,0.00018927456,0.00048251814,0.00069550215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988484,0.0002988855,0.00020534088,0.00013352616,0.00020009161,0.00031375999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001049158,0.00017689819,0.0004060535,0.00011910575,0.0006636216,0.000031154737,0.00031543235,0.00018094222,0.000508106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041164615,0.00019089028,0.0001731049,0.00036204228,0.0011095722,0.00039134457,0.00009424051,0.0002060474,0.00011350019],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009424179,0.00017608065,0.053100757,0.0000763107,0.0002130392,0.00002799691,0.007980715,0.0000043365144,0.0004833115,0.89805895,0.035853833,0.003930437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013810883,0.000066350694,0.039179053,0.00052748254,0.00030911906,0.000015465192,0.0076621715,0.000013192474,0.00007699653,0.0073621715,0.9429262,0.0004806544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10338942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032684576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9070724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005224484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010657301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9849664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6998895701","doi":"","title":"Between Judicial Activism and Political Cooperation: The Case of the Canadian Supreme Court","year":2018,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Cineca Institutional Research Information System (Tor Vergata University)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Supreme court; Judicial activism; Human rights; Judicial review; High Court; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.08271482685245418,"score_gpt":0.3150118525570199,"score_spread":0.23229702570456573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6998895701","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3884291,0.000063766536,0.00043713924,0.023914376,0.0017468146,0.0016499871,0.0015666079,0.000045328776,0.5821469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983805,0.000019907733,0.000008861993,0.00012499605,0.0011479096,0.0000030734975,0.000022152928,0.000003272611,0.00028931798],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969758,0.0006265149,0.00040971636,0.00020434303,0.001140018,0.00064365065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99613994,0.00039185517,0.00015640039,0.00027362793,0.0026497347,0.00038844437],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020020022,0.00016487384,0.00023920766,0.00043219054,0.012237303,0.00024018143,0.0006416468,0.00022069545,0.000090606154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009712011,0.000120952776,0.000085694584,0.0018103045,0.008560442,0.0014766417,0.00041111975,0.00047404616,0.00017627385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004050402,0.000009448998,0.0029644407,0.00003770939,0.000091367125,0.0000408362,0.0023775394,0.000009802707,0.0000025585505,0.99202394,0.0021164555,0.0002853688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001309527,0.00022015886,0.051372588,0.00053747604,0.00016724212,0.00024970257,0.055942923,0.0007039784,0.00008966413,0.0014324208,0.8875726,0.0004017173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41426787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21952483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9905915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022828402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008239077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999399944","doi":"","title":"Contempt for Courts? Critics Denounce Disdain for Rule of Law in Ontario, U.S.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contempt; Opposition (politics); White (mutation); Rule of law","score_opus":0.06517594497430741,"score_gpt":0.3402755517972333,"score_spread":0.2750996068229259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999399944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15810598,0.00022831008,0.008984523,0.004410791,0.0008109201,0.0010804656,0.000084194326,0.00003591901,0.8262589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960706,0.0000061464843,0.0013322046,0.00048807642,0.00017122894,0.00005268245,0.000002455648,0.0000020556408,0.0018745101],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945307,0.000013060827,0.00013864532,0.00009523963,0.00012302735,0.00017695947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999401,0.00022810767,0.000028027986,0.000038468108,0.00027574287,0.000028674163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033533818,0.00004498562,0.0001237078,0.000013540072,0.00039122344,0.000013062348,0.00009122182,0.000037344562,0.00007801689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019140441,0.000039745082,0.000045318688,0.000035824825,0.0009439735,0.00007354583,0.000016445425,0.00002337174,0.0000039695706],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028134153,0.00003993452,0.0042600976,0.0000035184776,0.000008310406,1.18040134e-7,0.0032943222,2.41296e-7,0.00003652081,0.99072,0.0014314727,0.00017733384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044948363,0.00012007452,0.0034997321,0.00002620643,0.000012258272,7.493675e-8,0.0030072911,0.000008600632,0.00035222052,0.47233054,0.5200965,0.00009703078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5229194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96756285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83796465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010256895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029665718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48025748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999441021","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Law and Precedent : International Perspectives on Case-Based Reasoning","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"BiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional law; Constitutional economics; Constitutional court; Common law; Comparative law; Precedent; Public law; Human rights; Judicial independence; Argumentation theory; Supreme court","score_opus":0.08347819595326887,"score_gpt":0.366785463176605,"score_spread":0.2833072672233361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999441021","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012256831,0.004717044,0.0000047511257,0.019840633,0.00067087397,0.0015279707,0.0019817874,0.00026908272,0.9708653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.044643693,0.011552045,0.0011347756,0.0048602605,0.003387573,0.000977173,0.00463122,0.00012754898,0.9286857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99398494,0.0010339883,0.00047158566,0.0012571482,0.0024085694,0.00084375986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970596,0.0015735815,0.00021034045,0.00045365738,0.00017403378,0.0005288104],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012384654,0.0004382357,0.00054241804,0.0023943654,0.0052080927,0.0031625866,0.002386798,0.00033373444,0.022181958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032596537,0.00043866193,0.00020083046,0.0025200243,0.009769657,0.005319827,0.0039933757,0.0016896192,0.00022930601],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021189982,0.000114574344,0.0002813655,0.000014021242,0.00012622283,0.0012638741,0.0004902057,0.000005306331,3.4064146e-7,0.59719247,0.39989772,0.00040198298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005373439,0.00021445479,0.00011515649,0.00026172504,0.000021346359,0.0000631824,0.0026551238,0.000005260689,0.000010235886,0.054706067,0.9409362,0.00047390437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038026213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039318585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5424864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003967814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007553557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7002220714","doi":"","title":"Minimal Impairment: An Unreasonable Measure of the Justifiable Limits of Rights","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Proportionality (law); Charter; Legislature; Statutory law; Causation","score_opus":0.031611662584086944,"score_gpt":0.28267633650540364,"score_spread":0.2510646739213167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7002220714","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7787941,0.0005393196,0.0000027894578,0.0012030348,0.0006044953,0.00029145437,0.000050116905,0.00008572746,0.21842897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974792,0.000041100382,0.00004920029,0.000097731616,0.00024938586,0.000016589296,0.0000032524276,0.0000049531495,0.002058607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984788,0.0001541357,0.00022422062,0.00018297404,0.0006444706,0.00031542926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926054,0.00009694473,0.000113313115,0.00019475698,0.00021825646,0.000116172785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006571925,0.00009732016,0.0002009212,0.000030982665,0.0010200404,0.000024413153,0.0003799235,0.00008189896,0.00019269847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018086807,0.00006908912,0.00011001215,0.00069019315,0.00085365353,0.0002155515,0.00007844615,0.00010807213,0.00009617671],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034299053,0.00012723038,0.013342951,0.000016541977,0.00004518606,0.0000030210665,0.0015358329,0.00006548109,0.0007966939,0.9780835,0.005750867,0.00019841056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013656047,0.0003726022,0.15455385,0.00053112657,0.00024409572,0.0000026955233,0.011099665,0.000057235982,0.012432893,0.32283452,0.4958274,0.0006782867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04949872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03173128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65524894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050858373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028928727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9859371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7002467979","doi":"","title":"\\n Guantanamera Boxe\\n . Canada [Québec], 2000, 52 minutes","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Érudit (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Government (linguistics); Identification (biology); Data collection","score_opus":0.007306311194454038,"score_gpt":0.17364958232833405,"score_spread":0.16634327113388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7002467979","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37557426,0.07153241,0.000069021225,0.26287386,0.0005679694,0.00025009853,0.000053992288,0.0001660604,0.28891233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85785276,0.008581168,0.00007961521,0.0013910781,0.0003529324,0.000004294953,0.000007175789,0.000009237422,0.1317217],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892193,0.00004992496,0.00009462262,0.00019389098,0.00032839217,0.00041125712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945873,0.000089689296,0.000059317936,0.00010945438,0.00009454499,0.00018827642],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001056711,0.000116100964,0.00015605724,0.000044469558,0.0020862136,0.0000135473565,0.00024708523,0.000060239327,0.00044671592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060146387,0.00012576714,0.00006708006,0.00032728948,0.00026535537,0.000121097095,0.000096169286,0.00008891062,0.00007399321],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000766602,0.000049658298,0.034870252,0.0000028076404,0.00014268872,0.0020197968,0.0027166205,0.00005260121,0.00006621147,0.089105494,0.8400816,0.030815635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018803983,0.000012803891,0.0045536025,0.000008853572,0.000028642091,0.000027300905,0.0034228025,0.000009914454,0.0000090770045,0.001210229,0.99036574,0.00016297032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9989518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48227853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010054675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001410849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7006922966","doi":"","title":"2006 Yearbook Photography","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Yearbook; Photography; Ballet; MAGIC (telescope); Ballet dancer","score_opus":0.014547206007808724,"score_gpt":0.27710879635629687,"score_spread":0.26256159034848814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7006922966","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[5.6638277e-7,0.0032832948,0.000022633993,0.0005064244,0.0003001042,0.00011816114,0.000015260513,0.00023093421,0.9955226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00042307263,0.0016347814,0.00015647484,0.00048157005,0.0024818957,0.000010434095,0.0000024259516,0.00003455522,0.9947748],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943966,0.000017889513,0.00005357115,0.00011468735,0.00021904316,0.00015517852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998454,0.000010803001,0.00003239389,0.000054011445,0.000014066953,0.000043364063],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000058831312,0.00007674293,0.000107142725,0.00008242627,0.00016427967,0.000016171522,0.00010857727,0.00012119674,0.04245019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009334912,0.00006621481,0.000070219845,0.00011959708,0.00045808905,0.000012898621,0.000018842617,0.000055141034,0.001722795],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.2042615e-7,0.000008454254,0.00013597024,5.8593895e-7,0.000022685206,7.7787115e-7,0.000066569075,1.19991075e-8,2.0254906e-7,0.17550978,0.82157916,0.0026754676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029721716,0.0000021016654,0.000052953932,0.000017883978,0.000009358445,3.958422e-8,0.00015502943,1.8212592e-8,4.5849222e-7,0.00096998835,0.99866486,0.00009757671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08879238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12696409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17708568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017614186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009973138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008197287","doi":"","title":"The appointment process for the Supreme Court of Canada : assessing the goals and performance of the Supreme Court selection panel","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Mspace (University of Manitoba)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Process (computing); Selection (genetic algorithm); Remand (court procedure); Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.023941077238513603,"score_gpt":0.24797440013252672,"score_spread":0.22403332289401312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008197287","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98679364,0.00037287638,0.000025489175,0.007998483,0.0004875714,0.0006566385,0.000028643672,0.0000063805505,0.003630286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987141,0.00048548548,0.000011307439,0.00001763196,0.000079062775,0.0000032852533,0.000005445452,0.0000043789505,0.00067930046],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989193,0.00008046958,0.00011165075,0.00013276922,0.0005708054,0.00018499997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998505,0.00038063232,0.00041102542,0.000121641846,0.0005576207,0.000024113106],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062182435,0.00011009135,0.00018369868,0.000019467607,0.0038416341,0.000027257516,0.0004991553,0.000095924035,0.0000029073778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010513768,0.00006481434,0.00007735097,0.00018771632,0.0008097705,0.00011265813,0.00004950978,0.00020860971,1.5515838e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016707127,0.00042509005,0.7505938,0.0019353746,0.00280997,0.0000027073067,0.083177514,0.0010439034,0.0035253263,0.096266806,0.03265153,0.025897304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019885268,0.000051493436,0.6589983,0.0001529689,0.00027591063,6.277524e-7,0.32201624,0.000374322,0.00046241534,0.0007799448,0.016561272,0.00012764518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43771923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.995652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5579328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000117967014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013212798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99745524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008509893","doi":"","title":"The Character Of Justice: Rhetoric, Law, And Politics In The Supreme Court Nomination Process","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sound Ideas (University of Puget Sound)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nomination; Supreme court; Character (mathematics); Politics; Process (computing)","score_opus":0.02840477057301762,"score_gpt":0.2683425536616649,"score_spread":0.23993778308864724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008509893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96274596,0.0002472454,0.00009885374,0.002566821,0.00011340747,0.00013026771,0.000011409415,0.000007793831,0.034078248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99914503,0.00038351704,0.000016222619,0.00008670962,0.00010057669,3.945177e-7,0.0000020189289,0.0000015640379,0.00026397762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999246,0.00008754863,0.00008820423,0.00009327654,0.00032569832,0.00015928865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935323,0.00024900836,0.00009706677,0.00007033996,0.00020084872,0.000029521652],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004130601,0.00005532845,0.000110102985,0.000032757904,0.0019314165,0.000015982647,0.000228275,0.000047443275,0.000010865514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000107377076,0.000044909295,0.000037906055,0.00019159047,0.002041569,0.00021099846,0.000039016108,0.00007963646,0.000003803836],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011161719,0.000030637697,0.008201577,0.000010228684,0.000013555998,0.000002561533,0.028577717,0.0000017888011,0.0000012317983,0.9630132,0.0001261572,0.0000102139065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016561274,0.000018864352,0.039650638,0.000008605911,0.000036321224,0.0000019168024,0.059208084,0.000008246025,3.128739e-7,0.89615774,0.004689028,0.00005461567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006570284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012923927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.066855416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059256774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012825264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99936795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008761701","doi":"","title":"Constitution and by-laws.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Subject (documents); Legislation; Government (linguistics); Product (mathematics)","score_opus":0.007223933297404581,"score_gpt":0.19283547085095587,"score_spread":0.18561153755355128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008761701","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04570242,0.00007421045,0.0010984179,0.18192366,0.0002133273,0.00015685435,0.000025493411,0.0002783806,0.77052724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9729367,0.00055304583,0.00023785105,0.0003999347,0.000107380336,2.5041342e-7,0.000007691811,0.0000026449823,0.02575451],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992992,0.00011835692,0.00004720511,0.00017945927,0.00016174899,0.00019403058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996538,0.00008812334,0.00003696775,0.00006406201,0.0000254676,0.00013154953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006147424,0.00008009448,0.00011007672,0.000051170184,0.001042538,0.00005029515,0.00013238988,0.00007206899,0.00013909889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004898125,0.00008710425,0.000033930497,0.00020889092,0.0011300939,0.0007603696,0.00010413592,0.000080002166,0.000047136815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012635452,0.000015191566,0.016771525,0.0000022013242,0.000012353614,0.0000044346884,0.00038129347,8.9956626e-7,0.0000024819371,0.8269027,0.15531595,0.0005783524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017257905,0.000020927253,0.0038560333,0.00001225321,0.000015224706,5.6486634e-8,0.001688751,7.553949e-7,0.00005897062,0.0071271993,0.98692304,0.00012421735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03280923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038702495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9272343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003794676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001306877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9736314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008817017","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Cases 2024 (Pt 6) | Courts, Politics and Public Trust","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Politics; Constitutional law; Democracy; Constitutional economics; Public trust; Constitutional interpretation; Supreme court","score_opus":0.03146506673502819,"score_gpt":0.29301211637987995,"score_spread":0.26154704964485176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008817017","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07686654,0.025310457,0.00017655028,0.022804083,0.0037104087,0.0003146073,0.00034738684,0.00038874726,0.87008125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99251467,0.000715587,0.00009210214,0.0010666637,0.0013095402,0.000022127775,0.000011399353,0.0000048690918,0.004263016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861133,0.00007078783,0.00018405134,0.00028138855,0.0004349614,0.00041748668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991962,0.00026394226,0.000023425357,0.00008541914,0.00012344726,0.00030757455],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003032116,0.00013345193,0.00015925216,0.000044599463,0.0016153783,0.00046354005,0.00013105162,0.00009813467,0.001221021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004188496,0.000121421566,0.00006896497,0.00023934052,0.004069862,0.00040518228,0.00008242349,0.00021505762,0.00042583773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002211246,0.000022969292,0.003980573,0.000011760471,0.0000504012,0.0000995742,0.00018295135,8.37396e-7,0.0000054526863,0.9803612,0.014653577,0.0006284744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000897613,0.000017022348,0.0005733557,0.000053231717,0.000030862822,0.00003583352,0.0012670447,0.000008192155,0.0000059722242,0.09386658,0.90389335,0.00015881727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019759377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012309826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91564816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015744973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080584077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008857197","doi":"","title":"DELEGITIMATION BY CONSTITION? LIBERAL DEMOCRATIC EXPERIMENTALISM AND THE QUESTION OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC RIGHTS","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Experimentalism; Legitimation; Politics; Liberal democracy; Liberalism; Democracy; Constitutional theory; Classical liberalism; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.016428674201910267,"score_gpt":0.2696878300518581,"score_spread":0.25325915584994785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008857197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83818746,0.0021138384,0.0002731347,0.001096234,0.00015756045,0.0004906429,0.00002062313,0.000015333571,0.15764515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99884135,0.00069125684,0.00019700869,0.00002343477,0.000031613345,0.0000016297087,0.000004182815,9.953212e-7,0.00020853402],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941385,0.00018511573,0.00009369524,0.00010755407,0.00012828424,0.000071486465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996068,0.00006662755,0.00013414833,0.000046032197,0.000081805476,0.00006460174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004016234,0.000053056297,0.0001484878,0.00037227827,0.0010223325,0.00006362953,0.00013686456,0.000043861062,0.0000113883625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000011396598,0.000046392524,0.000047986177,0.0005848661,0.0023762987,0.00054572365,0.000080483944,0.000034560646,5.9699397e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052019686,0.00013909685,0.1078599,0.000020985628,0.00031300535,0.0000074139098,0.012583719,0.0000060778984,0.0003413007,0.8136072,0.06421676,0.00038433846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011327301,0.000496974,0.05503579,0.00033844815,0.0006846288,0.000041096322,0.14253116,0.00018985981,0.0012376743,0.76331913,0.02394929,0.0008486689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029564595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032716614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16065386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013755634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000061661885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9768976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7010623906","doi":"","title":"Judicial Discipline through the Prism of Public Law Values: A Contextual Analysis of Bill C-9, An Act to Reform the Judges Act","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Legislation; Legislature; Context (archaeology); Prism; Democracy; Law reform; Reform Act; Judicial review; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.04632063985858552,"score_gpt":0.3338341876767242,"score_spread":0.28751354781813865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7010623906","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5286008,0.0036804262,0.00033919036,0.07847418,0.0010759915,0.00093977974,0.00023230941,0.00019522711,0.3864621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973713,0.00015734958,0.00006117488,0.0013386145,0.00065714685,0.000041831612,0.0000150238775,0.000009564554,0.00034795902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976743,0.00031071957,0.00045402243,0.00033466148,0.0008366104,0.00038968955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874544,0.0003933455,0.00013231025,0.00037733413,0.00021555484,0.00013599238],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015111157,0.00017256882,0.0004324557,0.00008291663,0.0013918359,0.00019143731,0.00074447796,0.000098176555,0.0002444526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032955987,0.00008262989,0.00033354986,0.0019470551,0.0023233958,0.0005687867,0.0002301955,0.00024780762,0.00004316997],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024053674,0.00007725458,0.0011663703,0.000004645416,0.0007996684,0.0000021477472,0.012260432,0.000027053304,0.000069220325,0.9832174,0.0007218902,0.0016298319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039592493,0.0004056561,0.028287828,0.00015016487,0.0019649575,0.0000015455364,0.061582126,0.00014650552,0.00036367218,0.3085512,0.5975796,0.00057086244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18758622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28825048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6746662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018072975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035631956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7010871894","doi":"","title":"Judgment and Opportunity: Decision Assignment on the\\nMcLachlin Court","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Workload; Supreme court; Measure (data warehouse); Simple (philosophy)","score_opus":0.07315507619552493,"score_gpt":0.30719945078421257,"score_spread":0.23404437458868765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7010871894","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26039046,0.0027599048,0.00041888148,0.06005901,0.0014826133,0.0007252319,0.000018586827,0.0001392827,0.674006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933882,0.00027037706,0.00013628564,0.0044361367,0.0004017814,0.000032224416,0.0000015498622,0.0000047674525,0.0013286718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853504,0.00014363095,0.00015650305,0.00019387905,0.0007296139,0.00024134236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990582,0.0002583928,0.000053715146,0.00013738005,0.00009643514,0.00039586873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012386815,0.00010440784,0.0001328978,0.000019599278,0.0010478209,0.000110617715,0.00017558037,0.00006186668,0.000248051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005681023,0.00007182644,0.000038618004,0.0001063203,0.00054915965,0.00011370519,0.00010116122,0.00015186971,0.00024724758],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003569404,0.000067167086,0.001606283,7.5809993e-7,0.00002307904,0.000009880665,0.0006181125,0.00001575671,0.000010045772,0.9530502,0.0385387,0.0060243495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029330942,0.00008906125,0.0014634233,0.000044444598,0.000016513824,8.5470015e-7,0.0038189818,0.000007196493,0.00004025602,0.1426513,0.85143685,0.00013778578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008570997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060788915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81289816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017534096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028453136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7011466903","doi":"","title":"The Migration of Constitutional Ideas","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Variety (cybernetics); Jurisprudence; Constitutional law; Politics; Comparative politics; Constitutional economics; Constitutional theory","score_opus":0.01634818721657076,"score_gpt":0.2762287723849715,"score_spread":0.25988058516840074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7011466903","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0323768,0.00059052213,0.0012664798,0.007469001,0.00016881093,0.00006176291,0.000002611653,0.0000198491,0.9580442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99820966,0.000071653216,0.00005489675,0.00005728585,0.00017500398,0.000003485939,0.0000010584755,2.7887938e-7,0.0014267089],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960876,0.00002216587,0.0000817194,0.000035907233,0.00018169345,0.00006973534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997473,0.000102848666,0.00002512378,0.000022635495,0.00009273814,0.0000094005245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017753532,0.000020656793,0.00003107916,0.0000071116647,0.0008758473,0.000012740297,0.00005097371,0.000014231837,0.000049699713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059737897,0.000012830044,0.000024377554,0.00008245536,0.0022228467,0.000041100633,0.000008063221,0.000015169504,0.00001907219],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018804104,0.0000074298337,0.008023989,1.3537132e-7,0.0000029476842,1.009879e-7,0.000048512695,0.0000055873484,0.000037184996,0.98556757,0.0059569506,0.00034771307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003989884,0.000003337467,0.019043729,0.000002164612,0.0000033614338,1.632581e-7,0.00070428394,0.0000032152022,0.0000847671,0.41643167,0.5636567,0.0000267155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032043613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054294623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9658328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001660349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015034259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97440207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7013777544","doi":"","title":"Friendly Precedent","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Politics; Construct (python library); Political question; Test (biology); Supreme Court Decisions","score_opus":0.025549263475433688,"score_gpt":0.30355003125824015,"score_spread":0.27800076778280647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7013777544","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01551453,0.000058819372,0.0012065398,0.013151214,0.00021718733,0.00003691814,0.0000010250432,0.00005626028,0.9697575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98777217,0.000105113584,0.000068392255,0.00013406324,0.00018420922,0.0000045416855,3.460751e-8,6.1985446e-7,0.011730837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99966776,0.00001515697,0.000036107875,0.00005428041,0.00012696991,0.000099731915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99986047,0.000043254462,0.0000074864743,0.000024288145,0.000031135114,0.00003336522],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008922579,0.000020143487,0.00002814942,0.000007325588,0.00029874244,0.000007602399,0.00005386833,0.000013455348,0.0012702271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000086203225,0.000010709992,0.000016923765,0.000044407312,0.00024642056,0.000061403814,0.000016927283,0.0000072728285,0.0005455624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011080791,0.000005559048,0.003965382,5.9193226e-8,0.0000032135508,3.065596e-7,0.00023383695,9.261098e-9,0.00007155192,0.9718325,0.005507731,0.018378703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005819492,0.000008536585,0.006697174,0.0000048960137,0.0000016899805,8.1855895e-8,0.0007142785,2.1533433e-8,0.00013232266,0.06279787,0.9295438,0.000041145904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029049427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005099201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9722577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028292763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051237734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7014594068","doi":"","title":"Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Constitutionalism; Commonwealth; Adjudication; Underpinning; Human rights; Dominance (genetics); Treaty; Politics","score_opus":0.039657105448221444,"score_gpt":0.30975065739938334,"score_spread":0.2700935519511619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7014594068","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2790807,0.00045444132,0.0007263678,0.00516016,0.0001889173,0.0000965046,0.00001143411,0.0000813524,0.71420014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983257,0.00017786192,0.0003201344,0.00052174827,0.00018490072,0.000005101943,0.0000018538469,5.214893e-7,0.00046216854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938416,0.000027734888,0.000090008565,0.00010827627,0.00026127946,0.00012854498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99976325,0.000026990092,0.000021162648,0.000026982989,0.00009269302,0.00006893639],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017142098,0.000043285447,0.000067543966,0.0000071641057,0.0013876093,0.000010907942,0.000039574577,0.000029503653,0.00017634849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013452461,0.0000371212,0.000021343723,0.00010949555,0.0018828699,0.0001052843,0.000027298585,0.00002768058,0.000031783457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018331303,0.00001004592,0.18809387,4.672733e-7,0.000006147798,0.0000061658357,0.00017480005,5.2370206e-7,0.0000018237791,0.8103101,0.0011560868,0.00023809657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018142175,0.000007608598,0.5934633,0.0000076621445,0.0000076957585,0.00004455089,0.0008543409,0.000003067816,0.00000570439,0.19665898,0.20862696,0.00013868502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011106149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024564518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.719245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039382937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7018870012","doi":"","title":"5e Colloque Libre De L'Adte 2018 - Guy Rouleau","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"other","venue":"Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Portrait; Exhibition; Alchemy; Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.008868749959124561,"score_gpt":0.2064625915158206,"score_spread":0.19759384155669604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7018870012","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022730556,0.0013877149,0.0000029673804,0.0023429468,0.001402091,0.00050940574,0.00013972468,0.000113150134,0.99387467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0053124316,0.001639289,0.0005689612,0.0010002707,0.0015784038,0.000026795156,0.000044858425,0.000046068122,0.9897829],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972967,0.00023455774,0.00080413575,0.00028624714,0.0007100679,0.00066829193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981697,0.00023296087,0.0006773412,0.00026020678,0.0004031681,0.00025660347],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005260658,0.00044865065,0.00059210206,0.00005739869,0.0007115213,0.0001047111,0.00059228635,0.00069144636,0.6938112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003623395,0.0004554102,0.0002962394,0.000029854773,0.0022753906,7.315309e-7,0.00019580974,0.0002836912,0.10040908],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064462605,0.00007922139,0.00004905849,0.00015829402,0.0001711105,0.000017786915,0.0016164978,0.00009064558,2.3033039e-7,0.0066535072,0.9841599,0.006939303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038897933,0.00020878858,0.00012634366,0.0004115134,0.00013317102,0.000033177308,0.0008624912,0.000015004061,0.0000047354483,0.00062914274,0.99669623,0.00049041375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08878571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03633007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5934021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033665978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036698795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7018984516","doi":"","title":"A first for this top legal mind: practising law; Former Supreme Court justice shares advice as she begins the next phase of her high-profile career back in Montreal","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Advice (programming); Economic Justice; Legal advice; Phase (matter)","score_opus":0.050741519832428805,"score_gpt":0.3244725207231976,"score_spread":0.2737310008907688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7018984516","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10889825,0.0004153799,0.00048953254,0.022909423,0.00053798273,0.00093816745,0.00013466243,0.000036593654,0.86564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99369144,0.000053945616,0.00063109456,0.0009655114,0.00045760965,0.000062668194,0.000012224228,0.0000066968114,0.0041188165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987451,0.00007746494,0.00024065608,0.00021842112,0.00037762825,0.00034075166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986809,0.0007977879,0.0001075851,0.00012266282,0.00022789599,0.000063207954],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005346076,0.00012402637,0.00021390356,0.000031008614,0.00087196217,0.00008989476,0.00024363075,0.00008193985,0.0015700229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049265416,0.0000859805,0.000082676655,0.00017514692,0.0004670782,0.00051732996,0.00006456837,0.00010676381,0.000099596466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037038245,0.00039074212,0.00090058986,0.00006148919,0.00011768864,0.000005135529,0.016698329,0.00007878127,0.00015082452,0.91483444,0.05642918,0.009962438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017835087,0.00024035922,0.001837717,0.00008652982,0.00020790745,0.000002015957,0.023381453,0.0007411209,0.00035688587,0.007731512,0.9633349,0.0002960875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39739734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4808051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9071029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000073112984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014818595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7018994993","doi":"","title":"Equality Rights, Ratio Identification, and the Un/Predictable Judicial Path Not Taken: Quebec (Attorney General) V A and R V Ibanescu","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Path (computing); Stability (learning theory); Field (mathematics); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.028824572275926108,"score_gpt":0.27302654325878734,"score_spread":0.24420197098286123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7018994993","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81224704,0.009791603,0.0012244228,0.033618145,0.0023418402,0.0014911294,0.0001434387,0.00030685656,0.13883553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99374443,0.00023560914,0.00008760148,0.0014527068,0.0012947206,0.00006383795,0.0000127731655,0.0000060269895,0.0031023172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979575,0.00045038323,0.00034647775,0.00033883622,0.00059909484,0.0003077091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998949,0.00016474101,0.00013699644,0.00019449221,0.00027687574,0.00027791632],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020246794,0.00015186789,0.00026334185,0.00002324921,0.0022655956,0.00034415812,0.00022207503,0.000105227125,0.00006957096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047015617,0.000107717955,0.00005169315,0.00021502307,0.0024505523,0.00043948487,0.00011226968,0.00017003465,0.00006652019],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006556746,0.000027342487,0.0024075801,0.0000032881157,0.000040033992,0.0000026334262,0.0034498863,0.00000426136,0.000056849738,0.9885758,0.005011388,0.0003553751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023410157,0.000033710014,0.02241747,0.000032731976,0.00012840972,0.00000503049,0.0035220366,0.00010118072,0.00024305128,0.31332308,0.657449,0.00040329475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42855456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27765277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67525274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000106136664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037474433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99903333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7019938318","doi":"","title":"Janis Clements to Moderate Panel at Eastern District of Texas Bar Association's Bench Bar Conference","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bar (unit); Work (physics); Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.06206665032101703,"score_gpt":0.3001623180897081,"score_spread":0.23809566776869107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7019938318","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008363868,0.00038103838,0.0003916148,0.0016673959,0.00042467215,0.00028235142,0.00024345944,0.000043279786,0.9957298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21524227,0.0004460132,0.00010890858,0.0003106525,0.0002988429,0.000015735022,0.000048395254,0.000026153877,0.78350306],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826026,0.000109409964,0.000234298,0.00030918,0.0007785759,0.00030830485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999245,0.00006713251,0.00021037667,0.00011886338,0.00023852898,0.000120100776],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020250176,0.00017536746,0.0003753436,0.00005459142,0.0003148336,0.00006463262,0.00024378065,0.00019617694,0.025960838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017512607,0.00016267928,0.00009739879,0.00019405944,0.00014282545,0.000031003317,0.00021755097,0.00008153325,0.0005300087],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001628351,0.00015247539,0.08328931,0.000039342285,0.00063665543,0.000011552681,0.0017605133,0.0000078574185,0.000019126459,0.21171576,0.7001299,0.0022211904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001771272,0.000021919283,0.0070937146,0.00013905024,0.000059688133,9.467298e-8,0.00096759625,0.0000067459478,0.000022387941,0.0012398532,0.9899765,0.00029527722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042869188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042750347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2898466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032418896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034848944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9749296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7021112684","doi":"","title":"NEW COMMONWEALTH MODEL OF CONSTITUTIONALISM: CANADA E REGNO UNITO","year":2015,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Electronic Theses and Dissertations Repository (University of Pisa)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Government (linguistics); Carry (investment); High Court","score_opus":0.026537863622610163,"score_gpt":0.2385939901276755,"score_spread":0.21205612650506533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7021112684","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84731126,0.004596101,0.002399875,0.0042502224,0.00037488606,0.00031811802,0.00009562282,0.000028475511,0.14062542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99362767,0.00040840462,0.00018660529,0.00002243369,0.000045100514,2.5448355e-7,0.00001039049,0.0000033995993,0.0056957495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889493,0.00009870924,0.00018216408,0.00018738782,0.00036618824,0.00027060925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989203,0.0001379311,0.00023002541,0.00011779027,0.00034359167,0.00025032298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001454595,0.00012167348,0.00026932237,0.00004523798,0.0010315517,0.0000145897575,0.00022209983,0.00007261461,0.000021807244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058397134,0.00014139336,0.00006530222,0.0002800833,0.0008010649,0.00019372324,0.000049545662,0.00012466569,0.000001067789],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011479901,0.00006891787,0.0038588543,0.000017336366,0.00015349763,0.0000044831804,0.010636914,0.0015432143,0.0001916065,0.97995937,0.0031639182,0.00028709834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003284832,0.00086272636,0.0232797,0.0005837444,0.001271558,0.000033080443,0.77535635,0.0062152175,0.0007039909,0.1349006,0.05221456,0.0012936314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9219548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8620599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84505874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003220701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013756518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9918346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7022573929","doi":"","title":"Foreword","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital USD (University of San Diego)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International law; State (computer science); Deportation; International relations","score_opus":0.027417182222262953,"score_gpt":0.23091320885470026,"score_spread":0.20349602663243732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7022573929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4071106,0.00024941817,0.00032372383,0.000311168,0.00012635402,0.000049888455,0.00003988188,0.00003376564,0.5917552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99785453,0.000027261514,0.00005357188,0.000028872422,0.000099877325,4.9529262e-8,0.000005702696,0.0000014397783,0.00192869],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995235,0.000009567294,0.000037053273,0.00006242378,0.0001755055,0.00019190075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99974626,0.000035707024,0.00003436741,0.000043374057,0.000050405884,0.000089858215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006936401,0.00004241966,0.00008372149,0.000030606152,0.00043514135,0.000010172633,0.0001286432,0.00003325039,0.00033350402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003748521,0.000049429225,0.00006629766,0.00014263384,0.0006397603,0.000722136,0.000071996365,0.000033624652,0.00014312188],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023433266,0.00011792659,0.123054706,0.0000049115065,0.00004916091,0.00000398675,0.0120588355,5.1101944e-7,0.000011239855,0.8279244,0.008188035,0.028562875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024431196,0.00003281013,0.21355103,0.00002230318,0.000033583325,7.0205493e-7,0.06007674,0.0000022056786,0.000007240848,0.018122157,0.70770395,0.00020295642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019949363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001968123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80980223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000360601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040967545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36516353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7023552178","doi":"","title":"Ontario lawyers’ groups monitoring judge selection process as new law looms, leaders say","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Selection (genetic algorithm); Work (physics); Jury selection; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.034587756071874066,"score_gpt":0.29715087888454533,"score_spread":0.26256312281267125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7023552178","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35772875,0.00181352,0.00009933438,0.0076633706,0.0023151091,0.00028718458,0.0000040245804,0.00026006092,0.62982863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97937065,0.00010117904,0.0001874892,0.0017429895,0.002056394,0.000024995115,0.000006670418,0.000012155792,0.016497457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810314,0.00010269565,0.00022960537,0.0004139746,0.0006420172,0.0005085902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911255,0.000067031,0.00007355458,0.00011948266,0.0002487418,0.00037862232],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002630756,0.00017959221,0.00023496569,0.000025498386,0.0019924683,0.00021834802,0.00021659756,0.0001602462,0.0008535453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021443119,0.0001919862,0.000111233065,0.00045640682,0.0005565801,0.0005832287,0.00005971301,0.00040237597,0.00062403554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002551532,0.00008691921,0.042617094,0.00001204375,0.0000987255,0.000035018587,0.010196644,0.000057745634,0.0002632475,0.94293696,0.0028758682,0.00079422205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052834785,0.00006114787,0.0056305258,0.00013352517,0.00007855792,0.0000114543955,0.020273626,0.0000010095375,0.0031846352,0.08704275,0.8825581,0.0004963293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.65800524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8558247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87968224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000573997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019780772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7023726369","doi":"","title":"On Pardons and Miscarriages of Justice: Extracting and Dissecting Institutional Bias from the Conviction Review Framework in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Government (linguistics); Perspective (graphical); Subject (documents); Identification (biology)","score_opus":0.03381408080215897,"score_gpt":0.29280167791268613,"score_spread":0.25898759711052716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7023726369","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9587687,0.019756721,0.00006646609,0.011428393,0.00067022396,0.00022523725,0.000058580023,0.000013112197,0.009012561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916651,0.0069882055,0.000056360117,0.0009845538,0.00027208673,0.000011651634,0.0000011500591,0.0000022655229,0.000018580178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909776,0.00014052152,0.00019248034,0.00015857883,0.00026541605,0.00014523017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975967,0.0020930597,0.000097564516,0.000068324545,0.00007755918,0.00006680573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044980153,0.000075023636,0.00015206425,0.0000093865165,0.00076538016,0.00002102667,0.00007721454,0.000040974177,0.000085344436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004398645,0.00004617938,0.000017926579,0.00013132651,0.00041604874,0.00012424758,0.00003478339,0.00014598988,0.0000028418783],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019390436,0.000015368116,0.1889974,0.000045929828,0.0000317263,0.0000067812257,0.0005260972,0.0000055876726,0.000072596216,0.80217254,0.00080515863,0.0073014363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081004336,0.000051910978,0.7307854,0.015993806,0.00025203225,0.000005533592,0.014001818,0.000006667638,0.00015024772,0.12535557,0.11204204,0.0005448797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9281326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9719823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67681694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000141603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049679406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5886763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7024184881","doi":"","title":"Refining the Reasonable Apprehension of Bias Test:\\nProviding Judges Better Tools for Addressing Judicial\\nDisqualification","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Apprehension; Test (biology); Jurisprudence; Order (exchange); Empirical research","score_opus":0.11125272735678109,"score_gpt":0.320596949783814,"score_spread":0.20934422242703288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7024184881","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83031476,0.00310448,0.0008858947,0.025112085,0.00087727385,0.0016401842,0.000056660156,0.00025086818,0.13775778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995549,0.000059809292,0.0015836853,0.0013834774,0.0007694816,0.00021996441,0.00001527647,0.0000121445,0.00040713558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838996,0.00016870016,0.00035975882,0.00026684644,0.00044434375,0.0003703687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972842,0.0018107945,0.00025098035,0.00020626775,0.0003584036,0.00008935335],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096741965,0.00013431374,0.0002371959,0.000032819535,0.0020962667,0.0002714837,0.0002867975,0.000106652304,0.00015142729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032888085,0.0001000393,0.00010968593,0.00026931756,0.0006627861,0.00072176964,0.00007797961,0.000146499,0.00010227893],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034409575,0.00012407922,0.025883885,0.000057252408,0.00008024915,7.987649e-7,0.0036653385,0.0000367886,0.014043044,0.88416743,0.017637014,0.054269727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00108561,0.00019280738,0.049555883,0.000805694,0.00021144426,0.000002478566,0.02646442,0.00018195246,0.008762892,0.17745085,0.73438585,0.00090010354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022340167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025486664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71674883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008522472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015130728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99920285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7026451660","doi":"","title":"Access to Justice: Report on Selected Reform Initiatives in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Economic Justice; Point (geometry); Happening; Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.03753489004126905,"score_gpt":0.30977844806912413,"score_spread":0.2722435580278551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7026451660","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51227355,0.00006685251,0.000004653102,0.003245138,0.00041308106,0.00017666999,0.000009890706,0.000035582587,0.4837746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958043,0.0001350104,0.000045209636,0.0031465623,0.00036048246,0.000040245748,0.0000056020235,0.000005073541,0.0004575311],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985471,0.00007265382,0.00024246983,0.00024614122,0.0005348113,0.0003568552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933195,0.000089451474,0.00006760497,0.000116362404,0.00019273949,0.00020189364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020406676,0.00010602698,0.0001798416,0.00005123164,0.0010228582,0.000036105932,0.00025857042,0.000046190242,0.0001591882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007322556,0.00009734026,0.000023649469,0.00081590854,0.00020591615,0.00031857926,0.000070172806,0.00018698443,0.00006863132],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013474171,0.00015484258,0.32275617,0.000015777925,0.00007123997,0.002463232,0.0036276856,0.00021393826,0.000035422272,0.6458954,0.023994444,0.0006370823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002555922,0.00004083996,0.80720943,0.00006723781,0.000013929805,0.000014070199,0.0028238518,0.0000014279634,0.0001889522,0.0020391198,0.18704422,0.00030132054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99322677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6438563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014820524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034753606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7867102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7026625615","doi":"","title":"Alle piler peker opp En vekstkurveanalyse av kvinner i de høyeste domstolene","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Bergen Open Research Archive (BORA) (University of Bergen)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Università degli Studi di Trento; York University; University of Cincinnati","keywords":"Representation (politics); Legislature; Selection (genetic algorithm); Scope (computer science); Sample (material); Social representation","score_opus":0.06724094224199764,"score_gpt":0.37366134754857605,"score_spread":0.30642040530657844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7026625615","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15793198,0.0025383753,0.00033402292,0.0035135406,0.0009302067,0.002272555,0.00068879826,0.000058974994,0.83173156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.674647,0.014665919,0.0033637136,0.000083147745,0.00059063954,0.000026954953,0.001849674,0.00008450147,0.30468848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938396,0.0019265083,0.00034297054,0.0008623024,0.0018985737,0.0011299948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99677104,0.0007430299,0.0003099103,0.00053995015,0.0011482618,0.0004877998],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033198318,0.00034297138,0.0007943463,0.0006299463,0.0029132394,0.00014107657,0.0029742138,0.0003798375,0.005097605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054962427,0.00040546447,0.00041527647,0.0011525092,0.0013119187,0.00054119516,0.0012207609,0.0009743354,0.0012291019],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003573178,0.0010370975,0.010054628,0.00037938156,0.003998525,0.00043774856,0.1330416,0.00020187908,0.0035777313,0.4187687,0.4084732,0.016456323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012157226,0.00025808637,0.047197074,0.0004462589,0.0003532519,0.0000016216017,0.15000704,0.00008286938,0.00009253908,0.029903682,0.7695082,0.0009336909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19694851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29306102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52704304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044602386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037715088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7026908478","doi":"","title":"Barnett explains Chevron deference and significance of the U.S. Supreme Court’s hearing of Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimando","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Chevron (anatomy); Judicial deference; Supreme court; Doctrine; Agency (philosophy); Administrative law; Adjudication","score_opus":0.032725981591642916,"score_gpt":0.2719203164874002,"score_spread":0.2391943348957573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7026908478","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9439935,0.0010156122,0.000028950255,0.0013754934,0.00032105934,0.00026540188,0.000029203587,0.000047612506,0.052923147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984436,0.0005562452,0.00002889706,0.00014128901,0.000118402044,0.000017903825,0.000001218997,0.0000045039587,0.0006879346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989093,0.00009888289,0.00021060724,0.00018209279,0.000371585,0.00022753428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994528,0.0001571007,0.0000896708,0.00013043656,0.000098843135,0.00007113271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037849476,0.000089242516,0.00019983113,0.000024277566,0.0005421195,0.000028081886,0.00024687624,0.000050281113,0.00010410494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021308783,0.000066063796,0.00006610826,0.00028504347,0.0011032707,0.00013837135,0.00014430554,0.000108564935,0.00002475146],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059697282,0.00007422988,0.29054618,0.000058522273,0.00008941707,0.0000046661985,0.005709866,0.00007184187,0.0052743475,0.6929307,0.0037263024,0.0014542339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087147905,0.0000699254,0.70225435,0.0004753222,0.000074387324,0.0000016377256,0.0058376635,0.000026281296,0.009588012,0.034265835,0.24610528,0.00042984684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019873999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013042606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6586649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034262262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001476307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98665273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7027026214","doi":"","title":"But Why Him? A Review of The Tenth Justice: Judicial Appointments, Marc Nadon, and the Supreme Court Act Reference, by Carissima Mathen and Michael Plaxton","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Economic Justice; Judicial review; Supreme Court Decisions; Focus (optics); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.02064910314676555,"score_gpt":0.27250422319724954,"score_spread":0.251855120050484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7027026214","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14424387,0.40035522,0.00004976881,0.124104045,0.0015653754,0.0024675878,0.00079642737,0.000108972454,0.32630873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8919803,0.095978945,0.000086156266,0.00990713,0.0003775161,0.000064496075,0.000021564396,0.000012028531,0.0015718988],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822766,0.00036797955,0.00029979402,0.0002731882,0.00055740675,0.000273949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990733,0.00022960236,0.00015763346,0.0002014953,0.00022444822,0.00011348999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007829567,0.00015326207,0.00035831798,0.000011564651,0.0012819379,0.00007470796,0.00026982607,0.00008368306,0.00019384497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005370489,0.0000922048,0.000077363395,0.00021593769,0.0017905794,0.00012716743,0.00025804256,0.00024155556,0.000010197897],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094337265,0.000100820616,0.004793957,0.0005162288,0.00021498396,0.000008961939,0.0013119646,2.8200517e-7,0.0002669983,0.8983169,0.09255344,0.0018211069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011187746,0.000036886897,0.004726389,0.0016854091,0.00057297264,0.000011402215,0.00378009,0.0000041141316,0.00015261097,0.028262688,0.9593777,0.00027094973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022566713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010859702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87005424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055831264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032492477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.985976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7027707413","doi":"","title":"Courts in Federal Countries","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OAPEN (The OAPEN Foundation)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Federalism; Judicial review; Comparability; Judicial independence; Federal court; Constitutional court","score_opus":0.029300458694038342,"score_gpt":0.32696952767433063,"score_spread":0.2976690689802923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7027707413","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003891678,0.00003653064,0.00002892364,0.006694404,0.001279799,0.0005368833,5.0370055e-8,0.00008877717,0.9912957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02713951,0.0019205635,0.000042577187,0.0006222868,0.0017641626,0.00009995806,0.000056372788,0.000075953605,0.9682786],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984143,0.00014563603,0.00018984528,0.00029556578,0.0005922722,0.00036241105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911535,0.00013575764,0.00031079777,0.0002977571,0.00008164651,0.000058698337],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057940074,0.00021230758,0.00031169926,0.00009711922,0.0022399796,0.000515112,0.00070866407,0.00017300656,0.2518053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024007961,0.00016879398,0.00008093444,0.000094472605,0.0014968788,0.00021331357,0.00013127866,0.00021288719,0.38359395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012608911,0.000029534334,0.0033539315,0.00000889437,0.00008479041,0.000011851869,0.00082516676,8.996475e-7,2.6707252e-7,0.20640641,0.015718307,0.77354735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017937623,0.0000068044715,0.0029800795,0.00014795811,0.000019126595,8.119947e-7,0.00028717145,7.714179e-7,3.298994e-7,0.011604977,0.98454934,0.00022326279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059323568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18693762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.968831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000201264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073051464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99905896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029675742","doi":"","title":"Judicial Review of Executive Policymaking in Advanced Democracies: Beyond Rights Review","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Deference; Rulemaking; Judicial deference; Legitimacy; Duty; Democracy; Separation of powers","score_opus":0.022804690602122302,"score_gpt":0.3464578828755558,"score_spread":0.3236531922734335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029675742","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00074373395,0.118693866,0.00008456079,0.008215532,0.00015034134,0.00041282718,0.0000032643452,0.000027674307,0.8716682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6002305,0.3838552,0.0004417166,0.01450111,0.00033727224,0.000050944243,0.0000033545286,0.000004921203,0.0005749967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864775,0.00020074043,0.00037534075,0.00017005371,0.0003649004,0.00024121974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934673,0.00018757384,0.00014760019,0.000094201074,0.00017048568,0.000053394135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092944765,0.0000955441,0.0004203446,0.000045195877,0.00033176932,0.0000047313274,0.00017951857,0.000036437967,0.00023060723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009924032,0.00007570709,0.000092162576,0.0005474274,0.00046532106,0.00013502689,0.000050621846,0.00007849309,0.000033413184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035790163,0.000026387059,0.00042766694,0.00074087223,0.000009946389,9.965516e-7,0.00044564146,2.6552883e-7,0.0000071206814,0.9817409,0.005139619,0.011457033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018504217,0.00003634599,0.001372422,0.031282756,0.000047940557,7.425099e-7,0.00035443436,9.897735e-7,0.000039491784,0.21199867,0.7544659,0.00021531341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007886097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011444985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8710932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006573201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014013716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99872047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029830175","doi":"","title":"L'impact des réformes de la procédure civile et de la déontologie sur le rôle des avocats privatistes québécois : une étude qualitative","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Qualitative research; Vulnerability (computing); Process (computing)","score_opus":0.08224822089695759,"score_gpt":0.44808879786137,"score_spread":0.3658405769644124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029830175","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7587805,0.007261564,0.000077273595,0.00076457247,0.00014608071,0.00049593113,0.00015322128,0.0000124115895,0.23230849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99015963,0.0016656702,0.0032315794,0.000031435648,0.0001371299,0.00015616273,0.0001526184,0.000028399396,0.004437374],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99649215,0.001533419,0.00041589676,0.00052674365,0.00039458863,0.0006372111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99661505,0.0025462518,0.00025024734,0.00012833392,0.0002793906,0.00018070897],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025171777,0.00042274222,0.0005704294,0.000085671316,0.0016210169,0.00069938024,0.0007367446,0.00047177504,0.00047085455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00221464,0.00036745326,0.00023031897,0.00073871005,0.0036724296,0.00068456365,0.00019764718,0.00048969034,0.00019311837],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012568662,0.00045965466,0.027111433,0.00017686837,0.000644616,0.00006786717,0.76678544,0.00005539251,0.00047773353,0.14057975,0.0008534642,0.06266211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037163668,0.00021297972,0.22481342,0.0014394269,0.00028749867,0.000017796672,0.5243923,0.00001681382,0.0007606929,0.22188537,0.025155773,0.00064631156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5554321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7600328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24239314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081798516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008157229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7042811484","doi":"","title":"The right to vote limited by criminal convictions : a quest for balance between functional right and individual right","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"theses.fr (ABES)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Balance (ability); Jurisprudence; Context (archaeology); ESPACE","score_opus":0.07328796293285507,"score_gpt":0.30185314961422405,"score_spread":0.228565186681369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7042811484","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26935205,0.046706468,0.0073887175,0.20271094,0.011637001,0.0038018837,0.006653318,0.00042735273,0.45132226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914634,0.000459773,0.00020794643,0.00092788483,0.002996277,0.00018706443,0.00007866799,0.000018797939,0.0036601445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972161,0.00029581893,0.00042258698,0.00049913453,0.0007990709,0.0007672651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972498,0.0014148739,0.00016202542,0.00019742649,0.0004673365,0.0005085777],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012243737,0.00032784278,0.0004002736,0.00006714728,0.0034024518,0.00025390196,0.00041979458,0.0002144649,0.00009869717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048265688,0.00023931812,0.00013373044,0.00049890694,0.0025433397,0.00034955482,0.00018964882,0.0002908819,0.0001937313],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009997552,0.00012526862,0.0051308344,0.00001387051,0.0003804591,0.0000054392226,0.0069095083,0.000009957289,0.00002998395,0.91549003,0.06794786,0.0038568126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058914436,0.00021030834,0.010322792,0.00007790996,0.00040340173,0.000007639123,0.003707615,0.000027712476,0.0001059279,0.056917496,0.92728364,0.00034639286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012005671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011507389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8593358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029447576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004624359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043462720","doi":"","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada: History of the Institution","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Liquation; Emperipolesis; Diafiltration; Triacetin; Demotion","score_opus":0.029384307716705423,"score_gpt":0.22230952609279914,"score_spread":0.19292521837609372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043462720","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045693953,0.000013456497,0.000010212283,0.0019958247,0.0009428048,0.00022889201,0.00001968959,0.000034108616,0.95106107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9764314,0.022950357,0.0000036892802,0.00003579319,0.000053478772,8.517961e-7,8.7617906e-7,0.000002089497,0.0005214131],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914324,0.0001140323,0.000095478215,0.00009435768,0.00037210074,0.00018078397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999464,0.00012519449,0.00009930833,0.00011900166,0.00016841605,0.000024105935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026092367,0.00005682097,0.00009480925,0.00050628727,0.00072294817,0.000003495009,0.00036384555,0.000034835113,0.0000071484724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002014485,0.000040305637,0.000065034634,0.0031949023,0.0010239187,0.00008437557,0.0001256674,0.00007288688,0.0000017035429],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006580998,0.00004851159,0.0056619565,0.000017485963,0.000119878794,0.000016321646,0.020237094,0.00006822592,0.000018785271,0.94274217,0.026351823,0.0046519428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010339521,0.000008321496,0.0031930776,0.000016618671,0.000021408508,1.4773568e-7,0.004119541,0.000008746721,0.00003243563,0.000023645922,0.9924238,0.000048906422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9827849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.990759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9660719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009624776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007979662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7045230023","doi":"","title":"Alla ricerca dell'invisibilita perduta: le \"sentenze senza autore\" nelle Corti supreme di Stati Uniti e Canada.","year":2019,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Supreme court; First amendment; Constitutional right","score_opus":0.020276548045611877,"score_gpt":0.23237961238708973,"score_spread":0.21210306434147785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7045230023","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52728045,0.0017110801,0.00030295187,0.009691265,0.0032927499,0.0015336896,0.0018039162,0.0002192816,0.45416462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8903957,0.002452064,0.00013938895,0.001168085,0.00052111666,0.00002238973,0.00029546046,0.00007679232,0.104929015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99142617,0.0009068174,0.0010921336,0.0020010509,0.0021635848,0.002410214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99579525,0.0010509957,0.00060168805,0.0009021497,0.000845621,0.0008043049],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000724988,0.0011853963,0.0015091005,0.00038848267,0.00411801,0.00022418227,0.001767157,0.00036847653,0.001247296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014374325,0.0012483633,0.0005310009,0.0012591892,0.0025475768,0.00075841474,0.0020028786,0.0008949072,0.0010899006],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008369229,0.001378103,0.19528742,0.0002964559,0.0027540508,0.0014009995,0.013400272,0.003356625,0.00052578544,0.71573573,0.064305134,0.0007225008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034882724,0.0005472083,0.1674894,0.00039541937,0.00087839516,0.000073448144,0.06704446,0.0012505319,0.00008399977,0.0036611445,0.7522817,0.0028059676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4036975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45195797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7120746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018753093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058144704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7066850227","doi":"","title":"Judicial Appointments: The Achilles Heel of the Canadian Judiciary","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Supreme court; Judicial review; Plaintiff; Accountability; Government (linguistics); Judicial activism; Promotion (chess)","score_opus":0.025442582709469433,"score_gpt":0.28255445006911556,"score_spread":0.25711186735964614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7066850227","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09437411,0.0008773352,0.0000026910463,0.04428069,0.0017416761,0.00043274194,0.000059165406,0.000027135713,0.8582045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957655,0.00010341334,0.00001532511,0.0025835866,0.00092738145,0.000022886421,0.0000012876704,0.000005867897,0.0005747482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856377,0.00015168745,0.00019437583,0.00017709009,0.000532035,0.00038105162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989775,0.000078384175,0.00018253116,0.00045327866,0.00013385258,0.00017446638],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006485361,0.00011368776,0.0001710486,0.00002049018,0.011803169,0.00018338539,0.0011421506,0.000093137794,0.0001968027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067330385,0.00006916531,0.00013752175,0.00010597043,0.0032681662,0.00020088148,0.00020070096,0.00023928616,0.00013019415],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060321013,0.000018946766,0.026724827,0.0000012221424,0.000052267944,0.000002664799,0.00071374374,0.000002776173,0.000011737316,0.9654834,0.0060930736,0.00088927074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023898049,0.00001743585,0.27948236,0.0000637551,0.00005103538,0.0000010211234,0.0016544709,0.0000014168257,0.00006310905,0.17918202,0.5390799,0.00016451241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95490944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9892712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9013914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017555774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010377372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7070313630","doi":"","title":"Politics and Judgment","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discover Archive (Vanderbilt University)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Constitution; Judicial review; Judicial activism; Supreme court; Judicial opinion; Legislature; Constitutionality; Convention","score_opus":0.016593980003708694,"score_gpt":0.2403598373683099,"score_spread":0.2237658573646012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7070313630","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1071451,0.00015573995,0.0021242204,0.005529134,0.00009051413,0.000127315,0.000034258428,0.000052900054,0.8847408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929484,0.0005143206,0.00021420121,0.00032097046,0.00015960488,2.683681e-7,0.0000031031936,0.0000023542018,0.0058367667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993761,0.000052780135,0.0000512284,0.00014602253,0.000159746,0.00021409024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997227,0.00007418922,0.00002159916,0.000053713276,0.000022797993,0.00010496605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000056716603,0.000066816974,0.00008233317,0.00007441424,0.0008648133,0.000027364604,0.000105516316,0.000022466647,0.000049846672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022640652,0.00006770489,0.000040372222,0.000115492396,0.00070997793,0.00021945655,0.00010349427,0.0000628101,0.000025822816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009664865,0.000032502056,0.0057271183,0.0000014739127,0.000024738918,0.0000081283,0.0037447363,0.000013011129,0.000017902956,0.987937,0.0009867126,0.0014970313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031906136,0.000019577345,0.010607815,0.000012331448,0.000028534101,7.2997597e-7,0.0081110755,0.000011654098,0.000019633766,0.038708232,0.9420245,0.00013684662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036468043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008914415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94922876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009319734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014736834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6651532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7070759270","doi":"","title":"Perceptions of meeting effectiveness in the Capital Health Region","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Capital (architecture); Quality (philosophy); Public health; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.005422952855856996,"score_gpt":0.18806250755415213,"score_spread":0.18263955469829513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7070759270","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004505084,0.0012726253,0.0000040051195,0.00357695,0.00008869668,0.00020475293,0.0001034801,0.0000046189552,0.9902398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97443503,0.0021838625,0.000027503094,0.0004582577,0.00011180014,0.000009272598,0.000004114273,0.000016559654,0.022753615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983857,0.00025381878,0.00014474326,0.00011925326,0.0009286059,0.00016782945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995192,0.00023147545,0.0001248336,0.00006651877,1.8758716e-7,0.000057742764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000024109282,0.00009336911,0.00020950267,0.00002150989,0.00025141708,0.0000061813644,0.00015810551,0.000025218485,0.000044237375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002953205,0.000074970085,0.000022739727,0.00008085019,0.00030629322,0.000049821843,0.000029407382,0.000087187706,1.5317697e-9],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018341705,0.000089851026,0.060032133,0.00039388615,0.00013318336,0.000057403573,0.005520149,0.000022512708,0.00009134549,0.8766228,0.03506813,0.021785218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039349517,0.00009817672,0.19319823,0.0020080581,0.000030795978,0.000003272529,0.07568783,0.0000081291055,0.000097906355,0.008164518,0.719904,0.00040556365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3806757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80586994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96992993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008320507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020624024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62344843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7071104050","doi":"","title":"The Selection of Supreme Court Judges What Can the World Learn from Canada, What Can Canada Learn from the World?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ELTE Digital Institutional Repository (EDIT) (Eötvös Loránd University)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Supreme court; Jury selection; Task (project management)","score_opus":0.016038222123975716,"score_gpt":0.20981046144395424,"score_spread":0.19377223931997853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7071104050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6503491,0.0026635805,0.000010641231,0.046463896,0.011180587,0.00058002665,0.0006267293,0.00006490497,0.28806055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97261995,0.000513215,0.0000029047337,0.00040170737,0.001715737,0.000003592117,0.000057821926,0.0000083550185,0.024676692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973601,0.00017539869,0.00028895904,0.00040806978,0.0013062147,0.0004612762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997501,0.0010002815,0.00037875763,0.00041981353,0.00050365186,0.00019648255],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002146555,0.00025345667,0.00025529132,0.00006109763,0.014423117,0.0016270933,0.0013579802,0.000073741394,0.00003806491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033472234,0.00017529429,0.00014065842,0.0004235637,0.003394666,0.0020681147,0.0003156285,0.00042685936,0.0000035146277],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064634345,0.00023747502,0.286227,0.000012991975,0.0022989744,0.0007996424,0.0053434866,0.0024682714,0.00016632232,0.56592005,0.11725117,0.018628241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023563662,0.00001390466,0.101261444,0.00012232526,0.000089409645,0.0000033171987,0.018116655,0.000018164923,0.0002009389,0.00097242964,0.87871194,0.0002538603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99362934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7614607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019048699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010376362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7072011262","doi":"","title":"Theoretical and Practical Problems of Metaconstitutional Review","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Element (criminal law); Supreme court; Power (physics); Order (exchange); Sovereignty; Process (computing); Constitution; Constitutional review; Compliance (psychology); Constitutional economics","score_opus":0.00673531685768227,"score_gpt":0.21608540763428374,"score_spread":0.20935009077660147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7072011262","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022713155,0.015252873,0.0000057178736,0.0146422675,0.00017128189,0.00026528395,0.00011663477,0.0000045465645,0.9672701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9563982,0.03925555,0.00032162838,0.0014355541,0.00008793158,0.000010498228,0.000031668085,0.00000552262,0.00245346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976572,0.00009409451,0.00028892027,0.00017303991,0.0016157626,0.00017100632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928516,0.00030461868,0.00019686711,0.00005884479,0.0000024092142,0.00015209094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000033073844,0.00013380287,0.00034339257,0.000012746789,0.00030814082,0.000010075008,0.00008311671,0.000042237847,0.000093677845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042742755,0.00011813026,0.000032807802,0.00006655915,0.0007084419,0.00016409115,0.00003114703,0.00013845995,1.4481991e-9],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071337134,0.000017324344,0.0003692959,0.00040212428,0.00006355295,0.0000134620295,0.00007218425,4.065762e-7,0.00009014945,0.99495983,0.00067368994,0.0032666342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053985225,0.00019586376,0.058822528,0.0096453875,0.00075579254,0.00001967762,0.013296146,0.000036885052,0.0030908454,0.4977095,0.4148792,0.0010083053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007783717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13536297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96481663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000509626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053011538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7072120867","doi":"","title":"A Unified Model of Public Law: \\nCharter Values and Reasonableness \\nReview in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Liquation; Diafiltration; Emperipolesis; Triacetin; Demotion","score_opus":0.058100902860395424,"score_gpt":0.24063773149830456,"score_spread":0.18253682863790913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7072120867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16096893,0.00007632288,0.00023704598,0.0046877568,0.00006209276,0.00043533102,0.0000524693,0.00004085188,0.8334392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91948646,0.07999475,0.00008065604,0.00039780512,0.000027340055,0.0000011979181,0.000001979288,0.0000031495279,0.0000066776333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999092,0.0001476988,0.00011364675,0.0001984134,0.00022727263,0.00022096348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961185,0.00005847404,0.000060143466,0.000062855994,0.000111104346,0.00009558852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015767362,0.000090867004,0.00021888215,0.00036578684,0.00023808469,0.00001585636,0.00019361482,0.00003659977,0.000010815955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007656439,0.0000938809,0.000033661338,0.0026594324,0.00027250874,0.00026832774,0.00011007904,0.000080844555,9.921791e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006305596,0.00007546816,0.010254461,0.00012733578,0.00008539917,0.00007508037,0.02365703,0.0000865364,0.0000051759143,0.938544,0.00019023777,0.026836222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004102395,0.000023287128,0.00026365856,0.00006980417,0.000036947666,3.199376e-7,0.008789216,0.0007235571,0.000012953892,0.0001312524,0.989349,0.00018975257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99612755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98915875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026592478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028279866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5016727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W70809028","doi":"10.21991/c98675","title":"An Opportune Moment: The Judicial Appointment Reforms and the Judicial Credentials Demanded by the Charter","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Law; Charter; Judicial activism; Judicial review; Accountability; Judicial independence; Transparency (behavior); Economic Justice; Appeal; Supreme court; Judicial discretion; Public administration","score_opus":0.03585155082644348,"score_gpt":0.2747012195231658,"score_spread":0.2388496686967223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W70809028","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03134022,0.009531585,0.0568332,0.17061116,0.00791711,0.0065297224,0.0008905515,0.00055775297,0.7157887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915157,0.0008772922,0.00006636834,0.0058385036,0.00083529047,0.00048081463,0.00006685888,0.000011150502,0.00030801367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99585664,0.00046148078,0.0008205652,0.0006223212,0.0011817865,0.0010571904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981058,0.00032296727,0.000372658,0.0005010437,0.00038447446,0.00031306042],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023716565,0.00045237332,0.00049891236,0.00009810033,0.0131164,0.0003076815,0.001019019,0.00022243444,0.00052976835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003301759,0.00023321541,0.00030659678,0.0004468463,0.043516815,0.0008438552,0.0003345601,0.00044717093,0.0001338533],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029738757,0.00016288339,0.0017517183,0.000002973643,0.00021935195,0.000009415524,0.0023051687,0.000008226082,0.000033591194,0.98317415,0.009959649,0.0020755092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003836231,0.0001555235,0.0018728492,0.0000953783,0.00043695554,0.00017947842,0.027439546,0.00012234664,0.00014813337,0.57104033,0.39392826,0.0007449681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00816699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004848373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9601755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024122927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014796241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7094203703","doi":"","title":"President’s Column","year":2011,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Rhetoric; Political rhetoric; Quality (philosophy); Column (typography); Excellence","score_opus":0.0519923683062352,"score_gpt":0.22296352022741092,"score_spread":0.17097115192117573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7094203703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19038899,0.0017937927,0.00045949983,0.0020300527,0.0012046468,0.00051088794,0.000080967315,0.00007280448,0.80345833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854763,0.0016009589,0.0007085889,0.000090832466,0.00022940857,3.306701e-7,0.000002197904,0.000006159314,0.011885194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824554,0.00016953601,0.00019831653,0.00038409862,0.00058767037,0.00041485066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888706,0.00010149105,0.0002815396,0.00019433547,0.000310687,0.00022489777],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032655383,0.0001731528,0.00038356925,0.00012499366,0.0017477502,0.000018341014,0.0007111691,0.00022203934,0.005895717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000066447836,0.00024133301,0.00026494567,0.00067754067,0.0028239293,0.00044959455,0.00040461254,0.00018071599,0.00051072607],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000551637,0.0012697467,0.07183448,0.00008470545,0.00080559344,0.00023964766,0.15004687,0.000008031136,0.00009517151,0.72764033,0.025802366,0.021621421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015302879,0.0005169137,0.5102548,0.00026306676,0.0005619083,0.0000033627107,0.15879856,0.00005913924,0.000062681946,0.07332373,0.25381547,0.0008101063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10613226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04453756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79508734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012750278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006459265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096682415","doi":"","title":"ATTITUDINAL DECISION MAKING IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Civil liberties; Period (music); Politics; Civil rights; Supreme Court Decisions","score_opus":0.07344068486719543,"score_gpt":0.3090872840188165,"score_spread":0.2356465991516211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096682415","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22609046,0.00011826129,0.00017797879,0.0009166941,0.00015235589,0.00006375166,0.0000012668153,0.00000401855,0.7724752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99947506,0.000016323189,0.00019309518,0.00022226179,0.000037160575,0.0000021050482,5.0771458e-8,4.9657723e-7,0.000053455395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994553,0.000031247124,0.000082881925,0.000048380592,0.00027735298,0.00010485532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997787,0.00011465984,0.000019663505,0.000035230787,0.000040845523,0.000010907448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035047592,0.000025498754,0.00005144604,0.000011439018,0.00023517765,0.0000037418863,0.00013922733,0.000012486432,0.00026801796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010148134,0.000015834039,0.000013346923,0.00012586315,0.00016784316,0.000033555425,0.000019901996,0.000030122765,0.000002150075],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011630734,0.000021830005,0.13601199,6.3472567e-7,0.000005211913,0.0000066509724,0.005668818,0.000001306619,0.0000016709697,0.8512505,0.004791472,0.0022282496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084703075,0.000014049242,0.8681934,0.000035301666,0.000005820657,7.1144314e-7,0.018786944,0.0000031767418,0.000014439762,0.08785343,0.024938518,0.00006949384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93012446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9946616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7733846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004359854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036217482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29346088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096765778","doi":"","title":"Judicial Policymaking in Published and Unpublished Decisions: The Case ofEnvironmental","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Politics; Judicial opinion; Judicial independence; Judicial activism; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.03867721018040781,"score_gpt":0.31116227950187614,"score_spread":0.2724850693214683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096765778","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7218294,0.00027289146,0.00011984671,0.05734662,0.00023865141,0.00021648551,0.0000070024853,0.00003541301,0.21993367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983027,0.00021913165,0.000042513566,0.00081664877,0.00026311397,0.000015282407,2.2621006e-7,0.0000024374617,0.00033795318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991151,0.0001045829,0.00015232929,0.00017127559,0.00021465606,0.00024206469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923986,0.00055958296,0.00003392512,0.00008018291,0.000020600122,0.000065866494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066086627,0.00006721881,0.00009320049,0.000060528626,0.00088742835,0.00012360504,0.00013387697,0.00004618795,0.00041137647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011885845,0.000032854277,0.000026534231,0.00023535507,0.001063518,0.0004957689,0.00014061359,0.000056942074,0.000023069832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012092379,0.000031712596,0.031736135,1.8899331e-7,0.000010500543,0.000120305085,0.0017913744,1.8863686e-7,0.000041605723,0.9033889,0.0029717472,0.059895262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016230908,0.000046798898,0.2417966,0.00008805175,0.00002673985,0.00017925973,0.046626434,0.000006955962,0.000027961714,0.506465,0.20266864,0.0004444596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043249816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.114348575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39692387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000115059636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000965182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9631213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097024748","doi":"","title":"Constructive Unamendability in","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive; Proposition; Focus (optics); Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.017988719828459288,"score_gpt":0.2998503682257887,"score_spread":0.2818616483973294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097024748","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16274016,0.000011910395,0.00024564244,0.0018646524,0.00014235609,0.00004308544,4.7315103e-7,0.000021017237,0.8349307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994326,0.0000069572857,0.00014352199,0.00018038548,0.000087108594,0.0000034050342,1.2169919e-7,4.0887485e-7,0.0001454495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996314,0.00006485023,0.00005233048,0.00006821344,0.000090063426,0.000093120514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998276,0.00008862671,0.000008487635,0.00002492721,0.000027831657,0.000022512859],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003076432,0.000022050375,0.000049886854,0.000012974155,0.00017261873,0.000006897358,0.000041045016,0.00001748774,0.0002537984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024869002,0.000018628214,0.000012682735,0.0000995466,0.000587582,0.000043466873,0.000013765959,0.00002837256,0.00004264074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013159628,0.0000071943477,0.10423472,1.5670203e-7,0.0000010370776,9.571315e-8,0.00068656943,5.325672e-7,0.0000015097963,0.8895188,0.00006691891,0.005481182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000108161694,0.000007951875,0.1642745,0.000003115025,0.0000012411203,9.2437126e-8,0.005022099,0.0000055338573,0.000011745638,0.7023801,0.12812613,0.0000593089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017494896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02986034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83669245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004410426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005434339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9890477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097228599","doi":"","title":"Equality Cases and the Attitudinal Model in the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Voting; Politics; Public opinion; Voting behavior; Judicial opinion; Precedent; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.14852605428557633,"score_gpt":0.33979537486561356,"score_spread":0.19126932058003723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097228599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5349995,0.00076053926,0.00008523605,0.043511398,0.00008514211,0.00017280712,0.000010838366,0.00000512956,0.4203694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99914604,0.000031973028,0.000012878633,0.00055491494,0.000035441644,0.000004650905,1.4851686e-7,3.713948e-7,0.00021359451],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999375,0.00011580724,0.00007768656,0.000045840872,0.00029662898,0.000089043526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995395,0.00031554064,0.000019367013,0.00003791674,0.00006463937,0.000023031142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011340148,0.000027654065,0.0000701237,0.000004221703,0.0002535007,0.000009152144,0.00009659036,0.000010309784,0.000006440083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038209307,0.000012919996,0.000010227953,0.00007232101,0.00076390017,0.00003265278,0.000027750517,0.000032908672,2.594312e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017369726,0.000008082641,0.012439783,6.315583e-7,0.000004966234,0.0000014288325,0.0051832465,0.000064374035,2.0920437e-7,0.9771978,0.0050247964,0.000057302615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022052766,0.000050229108,0.07539183,0.00002755269,0.00006274036,0.000009588427,0.2765337,0.002219855,0.00001390592,0.58946526,0.053714365,0.00030568498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9811635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99488837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46414652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000388696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082779874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2814622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097752533","doi":"","title":"Judicial Decision Making In the Supreme Court of Canada: Updating the Personal Attribute Model","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Parliament; Control (management); Remand (court procedure); Original jurisdiction; Legislation","score_opus":0.08209244764457337,"score_gpt":0.31948021376078894,"score_spread":0.2373877661162156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097752533","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5985024,0.00046920602,0.0038799788,0.03590698,0.00044322864,0.00032798064,0.000027541317,0.000017658653,0.36042506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987056,0.000010085444,0.00015113266,0.00090595987,0.0001754966,0.000004995908,6.121614e-7,0.0000013773747,0.000044685275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869,0.000087993496,0.00015459985,0.000084306936,0.00078592595,0.0001971829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941236,0.00031622848,0.000049462935,0.00005043288,0.00014379958,0.000027714535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014528496,0.000051157836,0.000093529154,0.0000141103465,0.00063878956,0.000020372969,0.0002563542,0.000025261415,0.000022984366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005597112,0.000027709739,0.000027374004,0.00021683857,0.00029250467,0.00006362668,0.000058364236,0.00008793573,0.0000015639736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000420658,0.00003586963,0.031016665,0.0000011927791,0.000019663345,0.000006118379,0.035247546,0.0024075906,0.0000052198625,0.8680205,0.05998141,0.003216187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009224406,0.00005934868,0.074609,0.0001673518,0.000059854025,0.0000054623833,0.4899599,0.034793857,0.000015520867,0.35986266,0.039073247,0.00047136407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7009563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96923697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50815785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015860471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017811921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49131173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7098044611","doi":"","title":"Photos","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Supreme Court Decisions; Original jurisdiction; Majority opinion; Precedent; Test (biology)","score_opus":0.09985443721546977,"score_gpt":0.34062479856669353,"score_spread":0.24077036135122376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7098044611","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013284838,0.000089841116,0.00009141027,0.002851317,0.00017197029,0.000026228463,2.2706797e-7,0.000042539286,0.98344165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99469155,0.000012532574,0.0000864766,0.00042957204,0.00017479614,0.0000023672294,1.11270566e-7,3.9862184e-7,0.0046021887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99974555,0.000011850417,0.000023002314,0.000030866093,0.00012468305,0.00006407869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998726,0.000009899129,0.000004230467,0.000015207602,0.00004518986,0.00005284404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012549105,0.000013470112,0.000022472686,0.000005538668,0.0001619676,0.000008874472,0.00003677601,0.000009979445,0.00017318441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009011475,0.000010623403,0.000009059718,0.00005844271,0.0001521046,0.00003788728,0.000010522828,0.000011144671,0.0003807471],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010418653,0.000005303045,0.002522374,3.7468222e-8,0.00000191785,6.421937e-7,0.0015011101,2.5985383e-7,0.0000026493549,0.9749192,0.0199155,0.0011299364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043907425,0.0000042329943,0.0005132415,5.888221e-7,0.000001098495,8.1436454e-8,0.0057702656,6.128424e-7,0.00002022138,0.089769445,0.9038505,0.000025819372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0155975865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004891469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98140675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019869129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011557132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9909576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7101388796","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17451482","title":"Constitutional Identity and the Limits of Constitutional Change","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Discovery Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional economics; Constitutional law; Identity (music); Normative; Transformative learning; Democracy; Constitutional court; Flexibility (engineering)","score_opus":0.0928225635029021,"score_gpt":0.3136442251716125,"score_spread":0.2208216616687104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7101388796","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043728743,0.006693926,0.008284873,0.019706208,0.0009808863,0.0013668921,0.0007806739,0.00019361581,0.95762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953941,0.0032489202,0.000029917555,0.000535503,0.0003085718,2.0078822e-7,0.00012372981,0.000046510257,0.0003125237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974134,0.00072191865,0.00042357048,0.00038530052,0.0007014985,0.00035430246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980338,0.00019597342,0.00019369551,0.00020369084,0.0012561722,0.00011665227],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019405179,0.000167563,0.00029319533,0.000143091,0.01086601,0.00056763174,0.0008749684,0.00010509106,0.0038878648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020679345,0.00014539169,0.00011044531,0.0010893972,0.034998417,0.00056626287,0.0012850573,0.0002889046,0.0006441035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016274414,0.00011447045,0.00004371346,0.000048940292,0.00017135941,0.0000027870828,0.0021147327,0.000005036646,0.00004354595,0.9664848,0.010542733,0.020265138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013978333,0.00005086784,0.0021227598,0.00017999938,0.00011018053,0.00002170838,0.0022209976,0.00005034925,0.000025344982,0.042227678,0.95143723,0.00015504367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00053037686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014064146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9910213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016146472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060133454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102758668","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0035","title":"A rule-of-law compliant reading of section 33: The continuing relevance of Lorraine Weinrib’s public law scholarship","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Jurisprudence; Constitution; Section (typography); Legislature; Scholarship; Rule of law; Public law; Legislation","score_opus":0.028029359702664902,"score_gpt":0.26856022067914115,"score_spread":0.24053086097647625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102758668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21984848,0.0026259623,0.0010650291,0.0023424858,0.00062927994,0.00015629451,0.000029168385,0.000015114169,0.7732882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99889064,0.00048899656,0.00027836728,0.00003697186,0.000073083684,4.920537e-8,4.971018e-7,0.0000013544195,0.00023006009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909997,0.00016170564,0.00020410267,0.00008151161,0.000309635,0.00014309623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988266,0.00017406172,0.00033846888,0.00007569169,0.0005418314,0.000043331253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008052696,0.000059413367,0.00022100544,0.000020599979,0.000995445,0.000017004082,0.0003047305,0.000053264925,0.00008743765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012598604,0.000053801974,0.00012396481,0.00008579506,0.0016046193,0.0005084186,0.00008033485,0.00014588522,4.4156909e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065421365,0.000042129646,0.0019164905,0.000014814146,0.000095456686,0.0000020658172,0.0044271257,0.000011478811,0.0009563541,0.9912905,0.00006997499,0.0011081496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002562346,0.00029932667,0.03640012,0.0024729052,0.00041353778,0.000016519283,0.106771395,0.000047808957,0.0019255854,0.09567669,0.7530356,0.00037817188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21423785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35019234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89561385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022268268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010646407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7909946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7103340190","doi":"","title":"President’s Column","year":2011,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Insecta mundi","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Association (psychology); Curse; Energy (signal processing); Appeal","score_opus":0.09204552440087714,"score_gpt":0.28384439445270926,"score_spread":0.1917988700518321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7103340190","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2033567,0.0033385814,0.000028101285,0.00053119054,0.0030396334,0.00035301482,0.000022596654,0.00008797315,0.7892422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930034,0.0015258538,0.0000693098,0.00045103478,0.0009814322,0.000033962588,0.0000015050441,0.000011727126,0.003921754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977574,0.00021085194,0.00037867422,0.00040177343,0.00060587685,0.00064545416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910456,0.00010851338,0.00015893453,0.000221487,0.00019359142,0.00021294106],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041688108,0.00022344003,0.00029594154,0.0000713194,0.0019677796,0.000103367456,0.00055718893,0.0001919352,0.0060971156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023780923,0.00023600114,0.00018333725,0.000500674,0.0020331666,0.00035685376,0.0002502987,0.00023359687,0.0016956901],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010304287,0.00042614498,0.28553683,0.00001620969,0.00026776906,0.0000779309,0.069088936,3.9618195e-7,0.000056928773,0.63003826,0.010698642,0.0036888928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005014404,0.00028404794,0.6716126,0.00012959422,0.00017723984,0.000007067291,0.002043565,0.0000054515394,0.000039733044,0.14885043,0.17566131,0.0006874819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.65029347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2339942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7896467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015681752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005675504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99933153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7104277713","doi":"10.71781/2284","title":"La constitutionnalisation de la juridiction inhérente au Canada : origines et fondements","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Indignation; Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.007287449746726094,"score_gpt":0.22592535253272739,"score_spread":0.2186379027860013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7104277713","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5784965,0.0075829346,0.0013373618,0.00086164975,0.0036010363,0.0003680926,0.00014253287,0.0001030295,0.40750685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98216355,0.0016868047,0.00021425243,0.00033864632,0.00071368384,0.00003427868,0.00042781298,0.000020398827,0.014400602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99595785,0.0008262435,0.0005517301,0.0006006107,0.0013546273,0.00070894125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977324,0.0006020612,0.00055119884,0.0001866015,0.000493715,0.00043399568],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011486657,0.00051374786,0.00043657463,0.00027007895,0.014928476,0.00007393499,0.0003792449,0.0006922475,0.00006912805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026874564,0.0006109511,0.00027076367,0.00067361834,0.0021775302,0.0005573414,0.00011758032,0.0006998123,0.00003098294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003853105,0.00023655916,0.06444856,0.00008768709,0.00054173043,0.0011498134,0.029473718,0.0036637716,0.0009615479,0.89502496,0.0013698853,0.0026564435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009811732,0.000048780752,0.12523751,0.00053140195,0.000549744,0.00035396905,0.047148343,0.00019924856,0.0010254578,0.0020775418,0.8211291,0.00071772473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98936343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97810245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89294744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024178501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055612743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7104278180","doi":"10.71781/1860","title":"Le rôle des tribunaux dans le développement des droits constitutionnels : constitutionnalisation et opérationnalisation judiciaire","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"China Scholarship Council","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Legislation; Constitution; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.07766201551129671,"score_gpt":0.3502454889524633,"score_spread":0.2725834734411666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7104278180","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31905392,0.002001268,0.037701547,0.009728341,0.0023040262,0.0023198642,0.0005164577,0.000026664013,0.6263479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836797,0.0009774207,0.004061013,0.00017452851,0.000297505,0.0002546337,0.003203184,0.00001822973,0.0073337867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99559623,0.00081111863,0.0011353999,0.0009611666,0.0008350986,0.0006609791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99701184,0.00026007244,0.0007270906,0.00027527343,0.0014935489,0.00023216603],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018015839,0.00058164395,0.0007416232,0.00025271525,0.010302934,0.00067279226,0.0008646129,0.00049995276,0.0008949938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009885781,0.0006800265,0.000267441,0.001402371,0.0056058057,0.0022305856,0.00024674804,0.0003772527,0.00045362543],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011497377,0.00050555525,0.0034903714,0.00006634732,0.00033985564,0.000012489216,0.02766288,0.001952388,0.000757834,0.93521094,0.00035590178,0.02953045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0048318,0.00030238827,0.035737783,0.0059561674,0.0013868156,0.000032058328,0.2998883,0.00048892933,0.01614997,0.41534632,0.21710922,0.0027702125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05334651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23287924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66462576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010800214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013205571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7104848950","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17585110","title":"Constitutionalism and the Nature of the Rule of Law: From Formal Legality to Moral Legitimacy","year":2025,"lang":"ang","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Discovery Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Constitutionalism; Legitimacy; Positivism; Consequentialism; Economic Justice; Legal positivism; Rule of law","score_opus":0.02940059947089649,"score_gpt":0.28024102670175005,"score_spread":0.25084042723085354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7104848950","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.074042134,0.001919426,0.0003919003,0.03153959,0.0005183844,0.0008354333,0.0013592433,0.00007516397,0.8893187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983025,0.00012438047,0.000026807882,0.00088151405,0.0001221786,6.056005e-8,0.000053526623,0.000044227032,0.00044481046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983615,0.00047815064,0.00027192154,0.00021548661,0.0004528606,0.00022004108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988295,0.00011303217,0.00012683147,0.0002172968,0.00065413304,0.00005923025],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091377407,0.000099245895,0.0002004682,0.00004815895,0.0047837757,0.0002219308,0.0008042113,0.00008314191,0.0008404432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009555525,0.00006803745,0.00008825567,0.0005404052,0.0045246626,0.00019350159,0.0015717155,0.00029496875,0.00009955356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013163123,0.000048659724,0.00004296205,0.000020106821,0.00009317291,5.2307956e-7,0.0043589454,0.000017451805,0.00013481168,0.98037434,0.011065289,0.0037120942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007704353,0.000029187948,0.0072500804,0.00015007854,0.00007073188,0.0000023626983,0.0026015337,0.000031249667,0.0003161287,0.037707794,0.9509753,0.00009509614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068312082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000046470712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94266653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000068515976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003474536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7104865798","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17585168","title":"Constitutionalism as a Moral Project: Between Legal Authority and Political Obligation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Discovery Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Obedience; Legitimacy; Obligation; Politics; Duty; Normative; Legal positivism; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.06358289927890226,"score_gpt":0.3329708058627501,"score_spread":0.2693879065838478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7104865798","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041315325,0.00011299967,0.0009808325,0.011138229,0.00012579311,0.0003748749,0.00014334578,0.0003432186,0.9454654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99831927,0.000035617428,0.00006473178,0.00026110778,0.00024646046,7.483484e-8,0.00019473056,0.000047739304,0.0008302656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872756,0.00026853083,0.00015064556,0.00023387931,0.00032220097,0.0002971923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992968,0.0000470294,0.000025800942,0.00008607736,0.00042777217,0.00011653536],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006066363,0.000075353404,0.0001072572,0.00014186146,0.0053744405,0.00050109776,0.00027148452,0.00006418212,0.00070469605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012740233,0.00007993677,0.000028824214,0.00051038584,0.0013582213,0.00024327048,0.00041160185,0.0001591645,0.0005617948],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012337645,0.000026771715,0.0001553843,0.000008100682,0.000025100771,0.0000030470833,0.00054252445,3.827139e-7,0.000029975085,0.9752024,0.016830305,0.0071637016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001961309,0.00003540386,0.005122476,0.000024975712,0.000019354971,0.000006912087,0.0014567495,0.0000066066923,0.000027572572,0.06396806,0.9290487,0.00008705187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035313664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001445606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95700395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018153878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058532485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7105093787","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17585169","title":"Constitutionalism as a Moral Project: Between Legal Authority and Political Obligation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Discovery Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Obedience; Legitimacy; Obligation; Politics; Duty; Normative; Legal positivism; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.06358289927890226,"score_gpt":0.3329708058627501,"score_spread":0.2693879065838478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7105093787","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041315325,0.00011299967,0.0009808325,0.011138229,0.00012579311,0.0003748749,0.00014334578,0.0003432186,0.9454654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99831927,0.000035617428,0.00006473178,0.00026110778,0.00024646046,7.483484e-8,0.00019473056,0.000047739304,0.0008302656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872756,0.00026853083,0.00015064556,0.00023387931,0.00032220097,0.0002971923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992968,0.0000470294,0.000025800942,0.00008607736,0.00042777217,0.00011653536],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006066363,0.000075353404,0.0001072572,0.00014186146,0.0053744405,0.00050109776,0.00027148452,0.00006418212,0.00070469605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012740233,0.00007993677,0.000028824214,0.00051038584,0.0013582213,0.00024327048,0.00041160185,0.0001591645,0.0005617948],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012337645,0.000026771715,0.0001553843,0.000008100682,0.000025100771,0.0000030470833,0.00054252445,3.827139e-7,0.000029975085,0.9752024,0.016830305,0.0071637016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001961309,0.00003540386,0.005122476,0.000024975712,0.000019354971,0.000006912087,0.0014567495,0.0000066066923,0.000027572572,0.06396806,0.9290487,0.00008705187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035313664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001445606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95700395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018153878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058532485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7105181057","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17585111","title":"Constitutionalism and the Nature of the Rule of Law: From Formal Legality to Moral Legitimacy","year":2025,"lang":"ang","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Discovery Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Constitutionalism; Legitimacy; Positivism; Consequentialism; Economic Justice; Legal positivism; Rule of law","score_opus":0.02940059947089649,"score_gpt":0.28024102670175005,"score_spread":0.25084042723085354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7105181057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.074042134,0.001919426,0.0003919003,0.03153959,0.0005183844,0.0008354333,0.0013592433,0.00007516397,0.8893187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983025,0.00012438047,0.000026807882,0.00088151405,0.0001221786,6.056005e-8,0.000053526623,0.000044227032,0.00044481046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983615,0.00047815064,0.00027192154,0.00021548661,0.0004528606,0.00022004108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988295,0.00011303217,0.00012683147,0.0002172968,0.00065413304,0.00005923025],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091377407,0.000099245895,0.0002004682,0.00004815895,0.0047837757,0.0002219308,0.0008042113,0.00008314191,0.0008404432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009555525,0.00006803745,0.00008825567,0.0005404052,0.0045246626,0.00019350159,0.0015717155,0.00029496875,0.00009955356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013163123,0.000048659724,0.00004296205,0.000020106821,0.00009317291,5.2307956e-7,0.0043589454,0.000017451805,0.00013481168,0.98037434,0.011065289,0.0037120942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007704353,0.000029187948,0.0072500804,0.00015007854,0.00007073188,0.0000023626983,0.0026015337,0.000031249667,0.0003161287,0.037707794,0.9509753,0.00009509614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068312082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000046470712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94266653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000068515976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003474536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7107862683","doi":"10.1111/capa.70040","title":"The History and Administration of Third‐Party Interventions at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Administration (probate law); Intervention (counseling); Psychological intervention; Remand (court procedure); Corporate governance; High Court","score_opus":0.03663017864356681,"score_gpt":0.28119568281881535,"score_spread":0.24456550417524853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7107862683","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17165466,0.005808628,0.000112315254,0.4813799,0.0021462268,0.00071888516,0.0002112515,0.000018528119,0.3379496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928566,0.000086150816,0.000004298446,0.00022979133,0.000038716735,0.000018610557,0.0000148530935,0.0000013288202,0.0067496574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991983,0.000092237315,0.000244394,0.00009323781,0.00020527205,0.00016652793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925905,0.00017352229,0.000119655466,0.00010568399,0.00023283472,0.00010922975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004589042,0.000053896034,0.00008261279,0.000038506194,0.0012516488,0.000029147626,0.0001485381,0.000042237207,0.0000839936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005305428,0.00003999072,0.000041849853,0.0001534957,0.00097564753,0.000087325054,0.000018204202,0.000057922865,4.8049543e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009032254,0.000008394973,0.0024718468,0.000008681522,0.000027919155,8.86278e-7,0.00019483904,1.2870802e-7,0.000008536209,0.90664756,0.08984449,0.00077767554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006142782,0.000030188645,0.014891701,0.000022821732,0.000021555452,0.0000010470723,0.0027776826,0.0000069642765,0.000054468608,0.0035505735,0.97853315,0.00004841553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7299567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.903097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008119906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01830886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9872564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7113185110","doi":"","title":"Constitutionalism, Judicial Review, and Progressive Change","year":2005,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Constitution; Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Judicial activism; Judicial review; Welfare; Welfare rights","score_opus":0.03583933071686711,"score_gpt":0.3072852877758966,"score_spread":0.27144595705902946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7113185110","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049981927,0.6393873,0.000013084178,0.08009864,0.0016462856,0.0021922793,0.00026136686,0.00015045366,0.27125236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87028706,0.08654065,0.00023404686,0.033351183,0.008458791,0.00035054595,0.000021363396,0.000017174576,0.0007392136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964432,0.0003003158,0.0006775159,0.0007526828,0.0009600623,0.00086623395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981892,0.00014601155,0.00034008882,0.00024167355,0.00047098534,0.0006120147],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008601204,0.00044614257,0.0007726724,0.00006112401,0.0032907918,0.00020304337,0.00039765736,0.00027666104,0.0034531173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044873307,0.0004307136,0.00020933653,0.0005892656,0.0066300333,0.0010738054,0.0003175281,0.00051518827,0.0013424916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024765803,0.00016002373,0.0014240242,0.00013446434,0.00015293517,0.00003133139,0.00091986073,5.924324e-7,0.0000055094843,0.9755581,0.013311431,0.008276936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005741651,0.00008559459,0.0023069412,0.0015657614,0.0005054747,0.000027869908,0.00056616927,0.000003219125,0.000014913562,0.01607706,0.9776554,0.0006174248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0104380045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009362362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96434397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027663697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006734243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7114914261","doi":"10.1017/s0008423925100966","title":"Sticking to Our Lanes: A Survey of Selected Studies on Federalism, Aboriginal Rights, and <i>Charter</i> Jurisprudence in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Legitimacy; Judicial review; Federalism; Scholarship; Politics; Power (physics); Constitutional law","score_opus":0.028206167991238994,"score_gpt":0.3526171193464236,"score_spread":0.3244109513551846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7114914261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9892255,0.0002622093,0.000012663023,0.0072556934,0.00058762776,0.00007152894,0.000024361572,0.0000015089249,0.0025588854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99894285,0.000010217356,0.000036057216,0.0009178507,0.000056166846,0.0000010002553,1.0489564e-7,9.937822e-7,0.000034745302],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838537,0.00012224224,0.0002987031,0.0001380358,0.0004409977,0.00061464723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997973,0.00032328122,0.00006611132,0.000047558275,0.00084827375,0.00074176164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013112631,0.00007538532,0.00024024297,0.0002642449,0.00061169686,0.000055555578,0.00030138623,0.000021349117,0.0000034737589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029508015,0.00006158548,0.000013831502,0.0013686692,0.00081564,0.000114348295,0.000015258403,0.00013562225,7.482311e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009535925,0.0000065389727,0.18072721,0.000004932779,0.000011482699,0.00005783212,0.0014003742,0.000018493003,0.000021671443,0.81692165,0.00069786614,0.0001223746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011036357,0.000051080337,0.9857426,0.00025762076,0.000008246366,0.000003881131,0.005190911,0.000004964096,0.00011944898,0.0069678193,0.0014528497,0.000090162794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99872315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80995387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016060455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03231827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9731676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7114994978","doi":"10.2307/jj.36075940.9","title":"Four Views of Metis Constitutionalism","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Les Presses de l’Université d’Ottawa | University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.04225955117286926,"score_gpt":0.2366520276689245,"score_spread":0.19439247649605523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7114994978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004016681,0.007188176,0.0029429467,0.00059957727,0.00057990634,0.0011212982,0.0016766298,0.00011690112,0.9853729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59137124,0.0340403,0.0028065927,0.00020147017,0.00043691957,0.0000032737182,0.00013895721,0.00006923595,0.37093198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951058,0.00047820015,0.000980867,0.0011422014,0.0014159303,0.00087697734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944949,0.0009112003,0.0018654217,0.000758746,0.0015524811,0.00041721953],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006817366,0.0009438311,0.001916961,0.00059841014,0.0025322668,0.000055537483,0.0025379977,0.0012385439,0.003006714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015583682,0.0012176051,0.0012756492,0.00014921486,0.009660945,0.00039827533,0.00155722,0.00089035655,0.000024562076],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000255904,0.00013979789,0.00071016507,0.0005476793,0.0022127125,0.00029284065,0.004230736,0.00012447659,0.00017824027,0.9597034,0.018297369,0.013306721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015281473,0.00015615027,0.00089994934,0.0016455937,0.0025316651,0.000015441936,0.0030684948,0.000028361703,0.0005204295,0.011412283,0.9772118,0.0009817225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08449067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019147463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9589144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056609925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015926689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7115038777","doi":"","title":"The Bork Bloc","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Supreme court; Legislature; State (computer science); Federalism; Treaty","score_opus":0.020897018123374807,"score_gpt":0.2801354613078463,"score_spread":0.2592384431844715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7115038777","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21573992,0.0066877673,1.3699143e-7,0.0006784182,0.010172344,0.0014004058,0.0009733496,0.00025753066,0.7640901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92571807,0.015374042,0.00004826695,0.0008348404,0.00043868617,0.00038914368,0.00018982425,0.00007163337,0.056935515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99065113,0.0013131291,0.0017481329,0.0017596049,0.0025594633,0.0019685484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993659,0.0022063996,0.0010428828,0.00089329266,0.0016404972,0.0005579222],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030555236,0.0012797875,0.0012194164,0.00029602367,0.038649984,0.0005556791,0.0024698644,0.0013436609,0.00042795294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004341284,0.0010908213,0.0011007143,0.0026294382,0.0015898034,0.0007533216,0.00057724776,0.002638555,0.0012330831],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019723324,0.00017483422,0.0000462347,0.00006320881,0.0006338214,0.000028780847,0.00005689263,0.000010647618,0.00034642415,0.796208,0.000054888333,0.20217901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004698217,0.00009754495,0.00096754904,0.0006727173,0.00055113534,0.000002864175,0.0070970943,0.0000047813583,0.0013589468,0.2545244,0.73315823,0.0010949111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015642196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059699785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73310333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013279611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088403665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7115812723","doi":"","title":"The Metaphysics of Constitutional Precommitment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"MacSphere (McMaster University)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Precommitment; Metaphysics; Rationality; Capital (architecture); Economic Justice","score_opus":0.026570253428206805,"score_gpt":0.26186766972581715,"score_spread":0.23529741629761036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7115812723","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039675075,0.00076655945,0.000035421213,0.0002799768,0.0010034558,0.0002261314,0.000041806736,0.00002066051,0.9972292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12118912,0.0010486132,0.00003690085,0.00001400157,0.00021049479,0.0000021255707,0.000044025684,0.0000047873923,0.8774499],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989822,0.000101300444,0.00013456229,0.00018141874,0.00039491724,0.000205591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991113,0.00012904749,0.00030946048,0.00015373885,0.00023972621,0.00005674263],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015746923,0.00013994405,0.0002173858,0.000036211113,0.0028656817,0.00006555506,0.0005881019,0.00013083828,0.0077479314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059598966,0.00011895542,0.00018042712,0.00012986269,0.002005888,0.0001473936,0.000049229526,0.00015485506,0.00003596132],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062942,0.000028200795,0.00033726788,0.000010186976,0.00021666505,0.0000053791173,0.00091321557,0.0000029306784,0.000005201584,0.8099753,0.0011072671,0.1873354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016051334,0.000014224085,0.0009795063,0.00007215832,0.0001425012,1.1452871e-7,0.011547914,5.831363e-7,0.000047344623,0.008404439,0.97849935,0.00013133146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002881676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027944839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9773921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013064871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007436356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99843246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116851784","doi":"10.1017/lsr.2025.10044","title":"The unintended consequences of increased access to justice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unintended consequences; Economic Justice; Scholarship; Empirical evidence; Empirical research","score_opus":0.057704401300537965,"score_gpt":0.3951120438434858,"score_spread":0.33740764254294786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116851784","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002667147,0.40044117,0.00005469623,0.15129954,0.00045234401,0.0007573807,0.000012527872,0.000047853762,0.44666776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19618878,0.7693979,0.000115519855,0.033558022,0.000079190824,0.00006700001,0.0000011733712,0.0000018934118,0.0005905259],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991179,0.00014846367,0.00021641792,0.00011771978,0.0002284991,0.00017098352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991565,0.00035155407,0.000073575946,0.000112000576,0.0002599208,0.000046445588],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008501431,0.000066991204,0.00021209728,8.4701543e-7,0.0013373898,0.00006458891,0.00044819643,0.000030299982,0.000029542189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056607655,0.000043325843,0.00016750602,0.0006070471,0.0029055132,0.0001092321,0.00011877311,0.000068322835,0.000011338889],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021041456,0.0000090414205,0.00011433229,0.00020642372,0.000047757585,1.9215902e-7,0.00015720568,1.7906356e-7,0.0000137322495,0.9626098,0.034285136,0.0025540516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004083236,0.000005485567,0.00026788062,0.0013076941,0.00016806638,1.1823373e-7,0.0012898014,2.0983539e-7,0.00004155133,0.041665252,0.95515686,0.000056253048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009010469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004182417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9209446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048906986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039345337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117924085","doi":"10.56975/ijnrd.v10i8.309012","title":"Inherent Powers and the Doctrine of Separation of Powers: A Constitutional Analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Novel Research and Development","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Separation of powers; Enumerated powers; Arbitrariness; Constitution; Doctrine; Legislature; Judicial review; Constitutional law; Jurisprudence; Constitutional economics","score_opus":0.09072042846149428,"score_gpt":0.45346536969248,"score_spread":0.3627449412309858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117924085","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8818761,0.004886568,0.030641397,0.020856827,0.00072088523,0.00040322018,0.00003175286,0.0000050030967,0.060578216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998063,0.00094191683,0.0007522781,0.00005119331,0.00004363455,0.0000033444271,0.0000017814739,5.1067036e-7,0.00014233831],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834454,0.00007713155,0.00039493476,0.00007202519,0.0010109063,0.000100469595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974258,0.00048682457,0.00017011381,0.000028587312,0.0018431213,0.000045571735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002116675,0.000045949062,0.00017645967,0.00043683645,0.0002252983,0.000037089263,0.00018781696,0.000026413258,0.00003299403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066884555,0.000030510593,0.000051523522,0.0004145041,0.0025615538,0.00009861676,0.00010609548,0.00011039952,3.401937e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00066750316,0.00017087915,0.021050788,0.000005775665,0.0017246391,0.0000034431355,0.0028466352,0.00003811367,0.00015127222,0.9670532,0.0003160312,0.0059717605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.018766146,0.00046242384,0.46156994,0.0011314766,0.00045078105,0.000043162974,0.039103683,0.000263934,0.0044558328,0.14566301,0.327627,0.00046259668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006405888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82139015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010524436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013029883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94381523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117960618","doi":"10.1007/978-3-662-71934-3_6","title":"How and Why Do Courts Cite? An Empirical Study Using the Example of the Federal Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Empirical research; Citation; Federal court; Remand (court procedure); Original jurisdiction; Judicial review; Court of record","score_opus":0.05954335106800677,"score_gpt":0.29481777521113206,"score_spread":0.2352744241431253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117960618","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04340902,0.0040237466,0.00035274518,0.054754153,0.0011943859,0.0027105135,0.00040583877,0.000024587636,0.893125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840468,0.00015579259,0.00001934231,0.0008732377,0.00018694214,0.0000073333867,0.0000021004398,0.0000040540685,0.014704387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818116,0.00018339203,0.00027353223,0.00025607666,0.0009140713,0.00019178221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985615,0.0006218166,0.00020261343,0.00018875067,0.00036526984,0.00006004709],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007924652,0.00019538912,0.0004126647,0.0000272669,0.002294196,0.00011479947,0.00030658641,0.00010129716,0.000057193854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001385492,0.00009383608,0.00007650899,0.00005798415,0.009262331,0.000073495554,0.00024584492,0.00022395629,4.4250573e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034804,0.000023471512,0.011455547,0.0000062295962,0.00020578434,0.0000019002872,0.0015497546,0.0000051143165,9.4206257e-7,0.9797752,0.0068422323,0.00009900933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020533053,0.00011582118,0.017183434,0.00030196257,0.000804761,0.000019393563,0.033716373,0.00010552317,0.000005541717,0.22837195,0.716702,0.0006199539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6765017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8505289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94063777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010738141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029996838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99900466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7123359246","doi":"10.1017/s0008423923000793","title":"The Ascent of the Canadian Judicial Council: Bill C-9 and the Move Towards Judicialized Governance","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Delegate; Legislature; Judicial discretion; Judicial independence; Judicial activism; Legislation; Misconduct; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.031223740899487658,"score_gpt":0.2833177113590427,"score_spread":0.25209397045955506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7123359246","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09382306,0.014924259,0.000020727877,0.6275984,0.007649217,0.0005140084,0.00014290193,0.000010322623,0.25531712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972479,0.00022246949,0.0000071909744,0.0017681553,0.00058388826,0.0000020656669,2.6971904e-8,0.0000029449463,0.0001653569],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99723846,0.0001487229,0.0003022027,0.0001308395,0.0013067272,0.00087304617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975994,0.00037370098,0.00009414937,0.000114987204,0.0007548475,0.0010628992],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004517952,0.00008666226,0.00016995167,0.000049439466,0.004098894,0.00038782615,0.0008833703,0.00004879476,0.00003685097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00607421,0.00003631067,0.00011632533,0.00081742136,0.01957917,0.00016871165,0.00004449474,0.00028605288,0.000004591376],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055992123,0.0000014811658,0.00047375442,0.0000012135501,0.000013249688,0.000011763015,0.0016063937,0.000001634402,0.0000027185204,0.99372435,0.0016556904,0.0025021282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026666257,0.00003070682,0.14912178,0.00017213455,0.00006281142,0.000033138866,0.0027563234,0.0000658854,0.000031353444,0.40583938,0.44149354,0.00012627967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9872688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9944161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90342486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026091563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06348647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7125679205","doi":"10.1515/9781773855196-052","title":"6.5 Interventions at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.040040021078515425,"score_gpt":0.2312220232017084,"score_spread":0.19118200212319297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7125679205","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037631643,0.004380274,0.000051952095,0.0004262805,0.00075519504,0.00038325627,0.0003699677,0.000014356451,0.9932424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.107426934,0.0010985609,0.000011798655,0.000031739582,0.00008463471,3.8680585e-7,0.000009531751,0.000009859412,0.89132655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981943,0.000065955515,0.00035071757,0.00032008687,0.00080385717,0.00026513508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874955,0.00019228639,0.00035246485,0.0002428346,0.000344501,0.00011835307],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002487073,0.0002404259,0.0004655636,0.00005719928,0.0013142378,0.00001231331,0.00066769385,0.00018651367,0.0010679539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017965413,0.00022459305,0.000592363,0.00001953492,0.0043722005,0.0000416681,0.0009223534,0.00031738225,0.000010095116],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007996963,0.00001426598,0.000015827169,0.00020874807,0.0005917162,0.000048285467,0.0022146797,0.000008198623,0.0000075280113,0.9917837,0.0038856869,0.0011413916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002208607,0.00005519087,0.00010280424,0.0011374162,0.00086823804,0.0000022243282,0.0017691597,0.000015363834,0.000050136976,0.016566105,0.97896457,0.00024795544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9154517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9743063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9752176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003622649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011369013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7125689301","doi":"10.1515/9781773855196-014","title":"2.3 The Canadian Judicial System","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.028164611037194507,"score_gpt":0.20860492806226472,"score_spread":0.1804403170250702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7125689301","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000021366608,0.0040490893,0.000017062037,0.00028236175,0.0019603511,0.00056571065,0.00013774728,0.00006517723,0.99290115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21328697,0.0016843332,0.000016321124,0.000047940044,0.0006444343,8.323895e-7,0.000007002037,0.000024057568,0.7842881],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977091,0.0000830431,0.00031673486,0.0004680736,0.0008626127,0.0005604454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984772,0.00018834916,0.00024689245,0.0002737077,0.00040132334,0.00041249994],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004360048,0.00034657266,0.0004991214,0.00013729173,0.0070429137,0.00012024356,0.0009278517,0.00052413525,0.000083886596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013695516,0.00033006756,0.00044544737,0.000026081729,0.006347865,0.00006015414,0.00038961176,0.00060385163,0.00016509849],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061007428,0.0000030424349,0.000003781953,0.000057931662,0.00050479226,0.00024199746,0.0026235739,0.0000012603251,6.944848e-7,0.988665,0.0006030981,0.0072338376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014037278,0.00004358357,0.000021615275,0.00060694484,0.00058414607,0.000004203914,0.0025753228,0.000045563735,0.0000026745186,0.02398833,0.9716558,0.0003314805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9425275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97181296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97105265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008648127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021474238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7125696412","doi":"10.1515/9781773855196-026","title":"3.9 “Decision-Making in the Supreme Court of Canada”","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Remand (court procedure); Legislation; Work (physics); Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.02675118559818748,"score_gpt":0.23081560994488015,"score_spread":0.20406442434669267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7125696412","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006033035,0.0019009268,0.00011690645,0.00018470993,0.0005439129,0.0004092602,0.00010562055,0.00000899572,0.99612635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88026613,0.0010039761,0.000101950995,0.00010717317,0.00013712214,4.33456e-7,0.0000029559244,0.000013154781,0.11836711],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760264,0.00008257501,0.0003829341,0.00036396584,0.0012567096,0.00031117993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99842715,0.0007159302,0.00029019185,0.00024483324,0.00025283615,0.000069042704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050180085,0.00025928614,0.000552976,0.00012011608,0.00064393814,0.00001822032,0.00097473327,0.00024049361,0.00021688158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046605044,0.0002412085,0.00025508297,0.00003872503,0.00237896,0.000058893223,0.00043868393,0.0004645746,0.0000032424023],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012999609,0.000016355018,0.000031138887,0.000058228175,0.00017997815,0.00024168642,0.008187637,0.00002001049,0.0000022734318,0.98314434,0.00073568185,0.0072526634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024576226,0.00005657892,0.00040600658,0.0019811182,0.0003218166,0.0000033682186,0.0059459065,0.000082909784,0.0000049730093,0.11399473,0.87662303,0.00033381538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82394433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9278611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8796628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023236909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001552212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98361975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7125709415","doi":"10.1515/9781773855196-044","title":"5.8 The Challenge of Judging Supreme Court of Canada Judges","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Legislation; Government (linguistics); State supreme court; Task (project management)","score_opus":0.02978012352325642,"score_gpt":0.2108701014347721,"score_spread":0.18108997791151568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7125709415","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027828236,0.0074358336,0.000022891665,0.00061710225,0.00058611686,0.0003546599,0.00015367079,0.000013993923,0.99053746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5840405,0.010156804,0.000032385942,0.000023946224,0.00016939381,5.18198e-7,0.000005086714,0.000020972448,0.4055504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997701,0.00006896085,0.00044261172,0.00035871068,0.0010804626,0.00034826927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980986,0.0004011656,0.0005437222,0.0002853188,0.00054532115,0.00012584474],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039092978,0.00028797553,0.00068003125,0.0000722792,0.0011378996,0.0000115943,0.0008294472,0.0002362198,0.00018818735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003239606,0.00027022927,0.00033629182,0.000022654565,0.0048631444,0.000053354142,0.00059988874,0.00037062954,0.0000015668109],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108338245,0.000014315956,0.000020621448,0.0001726869,0.00071352377,0.000038882503,0.0038940778,0.000007151838,0.000010099523,0.9893968,0.00039505813,0.0052284407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025084065,0.00009841586,0.000089340494,0.0007817761,0.00059044524,8.6668615e-7,0.0040939106,0.00004917746,0.00008561324,0.053152528,0.9404833,0.00032382106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81327343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8652256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9400882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019312692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017342042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7126002104","doi":"","title":"Public Perceptions of Provincial Human Rights Systems in Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University Library (University of Saskatchewan)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Tribunal; Jurisdiction; Adjudication; Stakeholder; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.012037045820254028,"score_gpt":0.19385557001971362,"score_spread":0.1818185241994596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7126002104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91730034,0.000070347334,0.00008517795,0.0021219163,0.00010125256,0.00025360502,0.0000555314,0.00004389535,0.07996793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874869,0.0000354608,0.00015728007,0.000017227316,0.00003267332,7.463451e-8,0.000014427261,0.0000026301498,0.012253315],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990367,0.0001704573,0.00012543134,0.00024091545,0.00020313996,0.00022333319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948287,0.00010779837,0.00010778087,0.00011987471,0.00008448187,0.00009721843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000114858616,0.000110737594,0.00028857135,0.000326263,0.0012464632,0.000022157623,0.00038835307,0.00014520396,0.00013114898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007684724,0.0001448094,0.00008938635,0.0007006655,0.0014760626,0.0010990698,0.00028090843,0.00013386413,0.00000563702],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011290224,0.00029960778,0.46524778,0.00009338504,0.0001496979,0.000048114485,0.10845562,0.000007992987,0.0001389324,0.42348468,0.0011861685,0.00077511166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007640178,0.00004390262,0.1146349,0.00013141833,0.00006563469,4.784574e-7,0.84302753,0.00000888819,0.000011871016,0.008370222,0.03274954,0.0001915805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6226062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85685915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73457193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012513083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007004705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9586913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7127953218","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i4.2615","title":"Do Pre-1970 Precedents Still Matter?","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Appeal; Assertion; Economic Justice; Relevance (law); Judicial opinion","score_opus":0.023953914497859267,"score_gpt":0.31364878628662035,"score_spread":0.2896948717887611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7127953218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01066484,0.0038385817,0.00010849005,0.007221799,0.006897159,0.0002990404,0.0000981147,0.000033039094,0.97083896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99116576,0.0024921182,0.00007166663,0.0016648738,0.00095061335,0.000011615535,9.755645e-7,0.000010635223,0.0036317585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966583,0.00036687905,0.0007581969,0.00041922447,0.0009683504,0.00082902226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985618,0.00016431979,0.00032760703,0.00018320938,0.00044735565,0.00031571637],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094711874,0.0003217534,0.0004677874,0.00012180478,0.015891217,0.00046956554,0.000737544,0.00021779914,0.003232404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014475464,0.0002912927,0.00034555205,0.00062021945,0.0014104481,0.00053000246,0.0003512291,0.00069637166,0.000727501],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011400808,0.0002664964,0.009287937,0.000024824958,0.00049654295,0.000043639662,0.0012022929,0.000043834832,0.000012663277,0.96643215,0.0065167095,0.015558875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005780768,0.00006530315,0.013052099,0.000527481,0.00019721377,0.000030939624,0.0016966442,0.000004870024,0.000062691324,0.07889544,0.9045792,0.00030999794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010942665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020532003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9805009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048234462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012520576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128539874","doi":"10.64903/1480-6800-25.2.169","title":"Legal and Constitutional Guarantees for Applying the Principle of Legitimate Expectation: An Applied Study in the Emirati, Egyptian, and Iraqi Constitutions","year":2022,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Arab world geographer","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Judicial review; Appeal; Jurisdiction; Legislature; Administrative law; Action (physics); Legal certainty; Legal research","score_opus":0.03309033554805505,"score_gpt":0.31032265576704066,"score_spread":0.2772323202189856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128539874","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9071518,0.007351005,0.0009663033,0.0035909996,0.0008419334,0.012275965,0.0003471794,0.000055516382,0.0674193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945794,0.00012146136,0.000100213634,0.00046267948,0.00015851427,0.004489862,0.000015178172,0.0000059444183,0.00006678996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730206,0.00045103036,0.00059631234,0.00051369745,0.0007159561,0.00042096555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864393,0.00067352946,0.00025765115,0.00023112172,0.00013112275,0.00006264922],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018191406,0.00026080146,0.00037542783,0.00020415334,0.006984284,0.00019513501,0.0004171257,0.00003761981,0.00014723795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000592455,0.00019080633,0.000110844194,0.0014224779,0.012588085,0.0002941319,0.00024254493,0.0003336495,0.0000010548346],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012846815,0.00054195384,0.08752135,0.000010805885,0.00013409625,0.000005823469,0.013339085,0.0004079351,0.000014810643,0.8968556,0.000076814795,0.0009632909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004635684,0.00076238543,0.17854221,0.00008079074,0.0006242866,0.000044665252,0.51478666,0.00039045553,0.00000973026,0.07305055,0.22613765,0.00093492086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018195596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01350818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82380503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041668292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004069878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9943085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132875535","doi":"","title":"The Reasonable Justice: An Empirical Analysis of Frank Iacobucci&apos;s Career on the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Economic Justice; Voting; Warren Court; Criminal justice; Position (finance); Roberts Court; Court of record","score_opus":0.07153925953025932,"score_gpt":0.3891530065442806,"score_spread":0.3176137470140213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132875535","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8073271,0.0005706793,0.00008720825,0.017568769,0.00021859749,0.00012204782,0.000014772022,0.000010859748,0.17408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985252,0.00007180573,0.000014991519,0.0003251133,0.00011005532,0.0000024243866,0.0000013379065,0.0000021670528,0.00094692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869895,0.00010196039,0.00014892418,0.00010592637,0.00069464254,0.0002496121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986003,0.00083108974,0.00008670609,0.00015941288,0.00025402912,0.00006846501],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001173802,0.00006398028,0.00016254371,0.000028671471,0.0010224645,0.000012223944,0.0002549135,0.000038509224,0.00011244505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047117114,0.000036401187,0.000069514565,0.0006527388,0.0005621004,0.000025020958,0.000029068686,0.00008550909,0.0000013155855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001796123,0.00014809547,0.069309175,0.000008317735,0.0012874589,0.000010343058,0.041761663,0.00074992294,0.00016880775,0.8200956,0.06498634,0.0012946458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020930744,0.000120737284,0.41375127,0.000027077842,0.001740118,3.1846716e-7,0.2623651,0.0002633959,0.0006821284,0.0028825966,0.31768993,0.000268005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83451325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96653664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.817213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000105757725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006408827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7864074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132938793","doi":"","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada&apos;s Multifactorial Approach to Deference in Judicial Review","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Supreme court; CLARITY; Judicial deference; Judicial review; Standard of review; Judicial activism; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy)","score_opus":0.08033757918172237,"score_gpt":0.3688370930469751,"score_spread":0.28849951386525274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132938793","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02054879,0.016802963,0.000007562157,0.0014362077,0.003399362,0.0011463041,0.000021281052,0.000019424471,0.95661813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9651895,0.019153949,0.00009398358,0.00025962468,0.0011817097,0.00018926208,0.00007307098,0.000018532708,0.013840372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984254,0.00012752842,0.00028048383,0.0002084707,0.0006491879,0.00030889406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992027,0.00013763901,0.0001732718,0.00012722859,0.00027344032,0.00008571962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053339667,0.0001462899,0.00035072412,0.000030271554,0.00052038283,0.000013515868,0.00039743708,0.00011147939,0.0000477686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008765098,0.0001126174,0.000061409824,0.00030267463,0.0001572035,0.000027029888,0.00002876563,0.00019853002,0.0000073727037],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058789755,0.0002763571,0.0018247075,0.00079063466,0.0002385877,0.000008680561,0.15177092,0.000008761346,0.00006794227,0.67620593,0.1529552,0.015264384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003729527,0.00006439406,0.02401358,0.003246898,0.0001933847,3.7118969e-7,0.08582875,0.0000018489138,0.000114735616,0.007731012,0.8775822,0.00084989937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9597347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99399704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9446407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018739175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029671593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52636135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132945733","doi":"","title":"Narrating the Constitution: Exploring the Role of Narrative in Constitution-Making in Divided Societies","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Polity; Identity (music); Storytelling; Politics; Focus (optics); Mechanism (biology); Perception; Affect (linguistics)","score_opus":0.049697444262072024,"score_gpt":0.36855099620660714,"score_spread":0.31885355194453513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132945733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6568233,0.02930768,0.000020596131,0.006615075,0.0035911216,0.0013559494,0.000012642022,0.000052932137,0.30222076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99640435,0.0018979595,0.000020363266,0.00010446862,0.0004755844,0.0004277316,0.000013589869,0.000010580752,0.00064536685],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99620783,0.0005998888,0.00097101106,0.0005833721,0.0010110256,0.0006268915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975935,0.0012641709,0.00052439014,0.00023233097,0.00033780086,0.00004777727],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018896091,0.00046992427,0.00068971404,0.0002037562,0.0031434002,0.00021802752,0.00063083385,0.00025792385,0.00013879503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011004717,0.0003213721,0.00029767025,0.0020261891,0.005792089,0.00040097756,0.0001891112,0.001213895,0.00003416872],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039551862,0.00003865034,0.0021901308,0.000054607863,0.00009578382,0.0000091134625,0.5529308,0.0007348591,0.00017958773,0.4424617,0.000076989236,0.0011882486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018761221,0.000029715293,0.0023572624,0.0030565294,0.00007796624,0.0000026675789,0.936805,0.00017260596,0.0002543679,0.048356406,0.008352384,0.0003474937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021236189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05972154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3941053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004477286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023345693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133006774","doi":"","title":"Legal Positivism and the Rule of Law: The Hartian Response to Fuller&apos;s Challenge","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Legal positivism; Conformity; Legal formalism; Perspective (graphical); Rule of law","score_opus":0.032510735301600466,"score_gpt":0.3631583644944972,"score_spread":0.3306476291928967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133006774","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42471814,0.0032326612,0.000002451384,0.07330928,0.00038098067,0.0005614463,0.0000068838576,0.000021470147,0.49776667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97062904,0.00037322502,0.000009791819,0.0004669058,0.00021084273,0.000074942596,0.0000046131345,0.0000064177602,0.028224219],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888825,0.00031183893,0.00012551373,0.00014953078,0.00034624056,0.0001786341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918103,0.00041519455,0.0000940371,0.00012020678,0.00013687229,0.00005264584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007444276,0.00011302317,0.00019900584,0.000025492296,0.0010280759,0.00006909422,0.00020921825,0.00009160642,0.00008916568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022595962,0.0000641254,0.00006772996,0.00009641536,0.00078537175,0.000053241944,0.000040485735,0.00014595881,0.000061024926],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058180594,0.000014375697,0.0000028550016,0.000005403922,0.000047092406,0.0000013326544,0.17793019,4.785639e-7,0.00016471514,0.8191253,0.0010909771,0.0010354577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057100196,0.00010766551,0.0078597125,0.00017687082,0.00012525044,0.0000010961458,0.21792918,0.000002117549,0.00034964914,0.019700844,0.7528815,0.00029508484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09361724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038714968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79942447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026989577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017447466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.978826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133026269","doi":"","title":"Of social and economic rights and neo-liberal constitutions","year":2003,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social rights; Constitution; Politics; Interpretation (philosophy); Human rights; Right to property; International human rights law; Social change","score_opus":0.023266089192543266,"score_gpt":0.3447974043814293,"score_spread":0.32153131518888606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133026269","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68854046,0.0024439266,0.000008676562,0.0009537527,0.00091569434,0.00029907833,0.000039163875,0.000014771072,0.30678448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98354083,0.00093983894,0.000058919228,0.000052312986,0.0002708716,0.000018281231,0.000029871699,0.0000069977314,0.015082096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985405,0.00012841918,0.00037382788,0.00040453867,0.00022620498,0.00032646445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921894,0.00012524214,0.0003280388,0.00006780601,0.00013030528,0.00012968878],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002237553,0.00028582537,0.000561105,0.00009345815,0.0025810667,0.00007051393,0.00010659035,0.00031993643,0.00042365314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041707288,0.00029399482,0.00011013848,0.00014485349,0.0037169335,0.0001446018,0.00004080941,0.0002084865,0.000025076975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043292126,0.000040528506,0.00099339,0.000036971396,0.0001642225,0.0000024651433,0.039719846,0.000002235509,0.00006239052,0.957297,0.0012880063,0.0003496328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029972813,0.00034165522,0.055902313,0.00043119106,0.0017475283,0.000027343258,0.21138859,0.0000466133,0.00063722604,0.23271106,0.49120095,0.002568241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027071638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02510112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72458595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000093683375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007581161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133051978","doi":"","title":"The Rule of Precedent in the United Kingdom, the United States of America and Canada: A Comparative Analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"IRIS","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Legislation; State (computer science); Legislature; Constitution","score_opus":0.043321754594418775,"score_gpt":0.34318086464118397,"score_spread":0.2998591100467652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133051978","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98017716,0.000958043,0.0000073403803,0.003497711,0.00009947362,0.00027404487,0.00010658251,0.000003521549,0.014876121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982696,0.0010018679,0.0000032484434,0.00015087781,0.0000151277245,0.000027511645,0.0002203236,9.82641e-7,0.0003104252],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988924,0.00031521046,0.00021918416,0.00009255359,0.0003678451,0.00011277602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822956,0.0011696322,0.00022806833,0.00008855917,0.00027124552,0.000012942426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025425584,0.00008250023,0.00023869956,0.000128823,0.0006366848,0.000023515791,0.0002666681,0.00003530761,0.0000072414045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016092767,0.000040696952,0.000053490192,0.0020538366,0.0005363004,0.000013032794,0.000020096604,0.0001202686,1.3331368e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051743037,0.0002713195,0.07621094,0.000107008265,0.007634716,0.0000068900627,0.6076726,0.0061549465,0.000027560152,0.26721427,0.030514516,0.0036678438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012145078,0.00002477066,0.25213203,0.00009305566,0.00079376076,4.1129606e-8,0.4525677,0.0002469208,0.000029025627,0.0025672817,0.29129776,0.00012621096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9949365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99447286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.264647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059990718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005681986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48969293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133818692","doi":"10.1080/07078552.2025.2598507","title":"Authoritarian Liberalism in an Age of Crisis: The Contradictions of European Political and Constitutional Development","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Political Economy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Politics; Liberalism; Democracy; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.06879537166254843,"score_gpt":0.3639715082747617,"score_spread":0.2951761366122133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133818692","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05020344,0.0012603163,0.00019952847,0.028305072,0.00034478685,0.00025724995,0.00002274322,0.000015148733,0.9193917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99885243,0.000026999614,0.00013768663,0.00082471385,0.00008909003,0.000024297397,0.0000018098484,0.0000014385414,0.000041513656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987834,0.0002122518,0.0004197217,0.00015460585,0.0000847986,0.00034520146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999313,0.0004131227,0.000031693296,0.00006871421,0.00009713781,0.00007633556],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006059673,0.00008068956,0.00025769792,0.00009744695,0.00037841988,0.000012037304,0.0001251375,0.00003549358,0.000007716843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003375239,0.0000655835,0.00003111461,0.00015685566,0.010469011,0.000086264794,0.000109968925,0.00011299249,0.0000012409125],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000580218,0.00006894528,0.016570488,0.00001278044,0.000048515023,0.0000062918607,0.0029376314,0.0000012471461,6.138219e-7,0.98014957,0.0000825473,0.000115574505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040400247,0.00002271696,0.08225585,0.00010954522,0.00002530245,0.0000011161643,0.067612655,0.0000039489514,0.00001395533,0.81872714,0.030720316,0.00010345271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016780064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029763854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.948649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018348117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004212868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9922239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7134698153","doi":"","title":"Foreword","year":2012,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Digital USD (University of San Diego)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International law; State (computer science); Deportation; International relations","score_opus":0.027163216265302194,"score_gpt":0.22451378786529963,"score_spread":0.19735057159999744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7134698153","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3959379,0.0021834827,0.000436546,0.0005617431,0.0006390358,0.00016054945,0.000296692,0.000039315495,0.59974474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99540216,0.00028082225,0.000047644437,0.000048933656,0.00031756368,9.470748e-8,0.00001581895,0.0000052793503,0.0038816738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856097,0.000033320997,0.00014072515,0.00020883558,0.00048062732,0.0005755005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991623,0.000100908044,0.00016526804,0.0001260414,0.00015295457,0.0002925097],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001652405,0.00016774716,0.0003081942,0.00008393243,0.0011297608,0.000037835096,0.00038340356,0.0001318807,0.0016464404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000070455804,0.00020822513,0.00027373905,0.00048592236,0.0024937124,0.0020296646,0.00033415653,0.00012585844,0.00058873737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014445734,0.0007466947,0.1299606,0.000046703884,0.0003931417,0.000018276216,0.039311748,0.0000022235035,0.000019809484,0.73278236,0.0160304,0.08054357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007106655,0.00017261844,0.20972927,0.00015061599,0.00026205232,0.0000029616547,0.16646194,0.00001687535,0.000011150482,0.020515932,0.6012721,0.0006937887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029554428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018324147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71226645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011542648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014473147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135384508","doi":"10.1093/law-mpeipro/e2414.013.2414/law-mpeipro-e2414?rskey=se8tir&result=3&prd=opil","title":"Sociological Approaches to International Adjudication","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Economic Justice; Adjudication; Politics; Sociological theory; Sociology of law; International law; European Union law","score_opus":0.2392785651360453,"score_gpt":0.32320491627332193,"score_spread":0.08392635113727662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135384508","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3002435,0.0007047236,0.0004741211,0.009599589,0.00008428887,0.00057155505,0.0000307843,0.000020410478,0.68827105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7499886,0.00022439192,0.00022657038,0.00003059236,0.000035274184,1.1690689e-7,0.0000122988795,0.0000027498374,0.2494794],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977965,0.0005800716,0.00009781656,0.00029126243,0.0009088167,0.0003255808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987246,0.00039067256,0.000105897634,0.0002308953,0.00039763798,0.00015033137],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017446057,0.00008561565,0.00022266811,0.000110745255,0.001699563,0.000016299893,0.0012873971,0.00010641175,0.25960237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014879988,0.000088599074,0.0001324505,0.0005568314,0.001765997,0.00027505515,0.00082893117,0.00019934465,0.07496125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053878274,0.0001261162,0.00020600503,0.000014643976,0.00018585095,0.000015345675,0.01686601,0.00010228032,0.0011235925,0.05632066,0.9208915,0.003609175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037689225,0.00010069515,0.02619348,0.000027330228,0.000020943617,4.973692e-7,0.04572896,0.000035783058,0.000121635145,0.00021119052,0.92707664,0.00010596533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056087915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033829608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44974512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035442272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003976785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135449662","doi":"","title":"Why do autocrats place judicial constraints on their power? A comparative analysis of high courts in autocracies","year":2012,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Autocracy; Opposition (politics); Politics; Elite; Dissent; Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.06614925940693328,"score_gpt":0.32934524650720015,"score_spread":0.26319598710026687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135449662","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6770109,0.0029100364,0.00009231484,0.001978671,0.00010885188,0.00087504886,0.00060961436,0.000016856544,0.31639773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797576,0.0009097824,0.000052351148,0.000048078793,0.000034684173,3.0118844e-7,0.000029911787,0.000007820004,0.019159436],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939925,0.0023615519,0.00037149352,0.0005156369,0.0018097919,0.0009490441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956311,0.0019597572,0.0005901281,0.0005018421,0.0009883869,0.00032880306],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033022468,0.0003302537,0.0013379466,0.00078844547,0.0025147274,0.00003982253,0.0015665912,0.00026598253,0.17003992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001709744,0.00033825092,0.00051173236,0.0036196795,0.010364736,0.00066254655,0.0010513794,0.0005697333,0.005348757],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004273019,0.0016906128,0.0006928718,0.000096002754,0.005329908,0.000109753586,0.13811415,0.0012212634,0.000980593,0.08056431,0.7647045,0.002222969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002217108,0.0007491203,0.24900144,0.00044131666,0.0011588067,0.0000016158293,0.24980496,0.00019974868,0.0008237288,0.00014975603,0.49490604,0.0005463467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026986243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0154934535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30274677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072446984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009633902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135503727","doi":"","title":"The silence of Justice Thomas during the hearings before the US Supreme Court","year":2012,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Silence; Economic Justice; State supreme court; Supreme Court Decisions","score_opus":0.04568033385130896,"score_gpt":0.29152958735399076,"score_spread":0.2458492535026818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135503727","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6683163,0.017294895,0.00007781548,0.013560109,0.0003373003,0.0014271187,0.00013823491,0.00002230577,0.2988259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7384749,0.002945856,0.000019758887,0.000027776177,0.00012816628,2.875039e-7,0.0000030746844,0.000009471515,0.25839072],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936334,0.0021732114,0.00030606682,0.00039003784,0.0023161594,0.0011811322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99494696,0.0021914637,0.0005148413,0.00087167794,0.0012025977,0.00027243476],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006343134,0.00027339434,0.00050695264,0.000086007756,0.017526006,0.00007105329,0.0040619797,0.00018613233,0.042688306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045704405,0.00018153743,0.00041977278,0.0015248249,0.013599674,0.0007352629,0.003078218,0.00081269257,0.008972782],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015117944,0.0003262131,0.00081516255,0.00023839374,0.0010826045,0.000040070758,0.12110203,0.00016566664,0.0017349281,0.035095025,0.83631074,0.0015773701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005198605,0.00015041104,0.095831335,0.00014312685,0.0004168534,0.0000058735327,0.22167487,0.000055695436,0.0004268651,0.00008158214,0.6805226,0.00017092327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027070178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013396757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15578815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000502235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007833081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9917988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135560134","doi":"","title":"The nomination of Justice Kagan to the US Supreme","year":2010,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.04505392842163939,"score_gpt":0.30293284236251766,"score_spread":0.25787891394087825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135560134","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4722765,0.0025943394,0.0003049364,0.024470882,0.00053811236,0.0016189493,0.00020722154,0.00001800947,0.49797103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.729506,0.0009954016,0.000067119196,0.000035557354,0.00009149097,1.8177707e-7,0.0000061656847,0.0000071607233,0.26929092],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99535054,0.0013975734,0.00026357325,0.00042107163,0.0018578249,0.0007094092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945544,0.0021670302,0.00038575116,0.0007459492,0.0018821594,0.00026468153],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053196694,0.00020837999,0.00043047703,0.00013584232,0.010181488,0.000061750296,0.0034964832,0.00019669351,0.084159635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00076280336,0.00016561623,0.00030400997,0.0016994552,0.007289779,0.00040515675,0.002003401,0.0007194866,0.02498672],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000963956,0.00016420844,0.000024168348,0.000057535904,0.00034942725,0.000027683851,0.027853502,0.00011441416,0.0053307964,0.03016209,0.9303166,0.0046355985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050130486,0.00021907542,0.018482441,0.00006380219,0.00028685972,0.0000017336695,0.08398292,0.00009702873,0.0008459087,0.000091395865,0.895259,0.00016848602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028879073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.084407486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25722948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002878089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011692436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9954118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135588661","doi":"","title":"Legal Authority Beyond the State","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.05274277215760445,"score_gpt":0.3052479228125902,"score_spread":0.2525051506549858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135588661","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034001288,0.006423323,0.00015908107,0.0032300605,0.00023099658,0.0011219275,0.00037703107,0.000041336516,0.9850161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05305763,0.00203198,0.00006402534,0.0000471158,0.00018953934,1.6289516e-7,0.00004636183,0.00001669382,0.9445465],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99436027,0.001731281,0.00022952672,0.0005668735,0.0023092933,0.0008027628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995658,0.001218399,0.0004284977,0.00071937434,0.0016882009,0.0002875559],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004656511,0.00029119203,0.0006468309,0.00018775504,0.009305131,0.00006761113,0.0033254367,0.0003367727,0.3067178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022421143,0.00026740372,0.00044626655,0.0007584095,0.0143135395,0.00046725967,0.0022287245,0.000919978,0.07359647],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040937468,0.000053574844,9.049313e-7,0.000037944566,0.00039018365,0.00011547209,0.011346696,0.0000055256783,0.00002630296,0.036417954,0.9496649,0.001531193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042573767,0.00016636861,0.00043437487,0.00010206381,0.00017994312,0.0000021260457,0.01580319,0.000007051291,0.000032606848,0.0023605437,0.9802224,0.0002636023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034165896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06910453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23312135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011275951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044056587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135745482","doi":"","title":"Independence of the Courts","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.06818915865121235,"score_gpt":0.2871526660988174,"score_spread":0.21896350744760507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135745482","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035722558,0.005839219,0.000029274515,0.0022682105,0.0001510321,0.0008748688,0.00029808248,0.00001665693,0.9869504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30497265,0.001980037,0.000021015123,0.000016169146,0.000027834149,8.2804675e-8,0.000009941975,0.000009378464,0.6929629],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99539393,0.000747557,0.00020752546,0.0004069553,0.0028015284,0.00044252982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969745,0.00068990927,0.0005265908,0.0006247806,0.0010309705,0.00015319907],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024886495,0.00020596237,0.0005506573,0.00016317827,0.005389182,0.000013896008,0.0030514942,0.00026399197,0.5612743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014662133,0.00020043374,0.00045257702,0.0004018099,0.0073910304,0.00026850592,0.0030737182,0.0008560804,0.008815938],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003200926,0.000052975698,0.000005496671,0.0000482919,0.0003339196,0.00007412913,0.007702446,0.00003035319,0.00011519327,0.19970167,0.7904187,0.0011967531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035175722,0.00009983424,0.0009891322,0.00013548974,0.00014975577,0.0000018809208,0.01356258,0.0000027405872,0.000062581894,0.0012388927,0.983221,0.00018433557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022663642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021092363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55245835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068487594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00221989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99677014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135746788","doi":"","title":"From Hamdi to Kadi: Comparing the role of the American and European judiciaries in times of emergencies","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Field (mathematics); Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.042750009631830815,"score_gpt":0.27033394473128725,"score_spread":0.22758393509945643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135746788","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.102002144,0.0064895507,0.000016063585,0.0019950918,0.000033467597,0.0005718921,0.000121121426,0.000008313333,0.88876235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72660416,0.001205054,0.000039098308,0.00001782864,0.000026192294,4.0420087e-8,0.000004459446,0.0000064577425,0.2720967],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99741364,0.0007414959,0.00021919642,0.0002997338,0.0010086119,0.0003173453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99799746,0.0005736936,0.0004403862,0.00040457802,0.00047731085,0.000106579304],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014985262,0.00017403785,0.0006136944,0.0001516346,0.0017924244,0.000015220406,0.0017277006,0.00007571544,0.024550106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012498039,0.00014485122,0.00020521978,0.00045921374,0.0071840514,0.00014131315,0.0015547236,0.00036278352,0.00096878014],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016924493,0.00020881052,0.00046642032,0.00006966544,0.0011591892,0.00007465298,0.12421188,0.00026952365,0.0021229042,0.16409163,0.67651767,0.029115213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027647262,0.00013968286,0.03082516,0.00027820584,0.00013352267,4.0046066e-7,0.06580649,0.000013852587,0.0002466128,0.0025852425,0.8995152,0.00017913982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08202351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.077129096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.624602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017231391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043177328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135806346","doi":"","title":"The Constitutional Reform: The Judicial Power","year":2018,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.047085588228889474,"score_gpt":0.3155549407419681,"score_spread":0.26846935251307863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135806346","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07166095,0.007832347,0.00022464339,0.022578659,0.00043202713,0.0010094887,0.0001914753,0.000026748829,0.89604366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7680673,0.0029127488,0.000024894376,0.000060648763,0.000192672,1.8662693e-7,0.000007370832,0.000006637906,0.22872756],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942571,0.0017991421,0.00026998718,0.00048180186,0.0022639914,0.0009279696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951736,0.0014442339,0.00038482106,0.0007083769,0.0020430533,0.0002459262],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048765354,0.0002542976,0.00044515546,0.00010981859,0.024481786,0.00011468474,0.0033374,0.00022196953,0.16564879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035293456,0.0001834709,0.0003902509,0.0015889779,0.056742784,0.0004893055,0.0022810525,0.0006374604,0.07343806],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011075935,0.00010320172,0.000012430099,0.000012834684,0.00043185917,0.000039481933,0.00859364,0.0000043677437,0.00027121004,0.22944681,0.7583116,0.0016649237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007188269,0.00033139603,0.008631643,0.00010047706,0.00014208266,0.000004688748,0.0827464,0.000019892383,0.00017926905,0.00045131514,0.9064766,0.00019739989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023913875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018231358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6964063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008753472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023604967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7139352817","doi":"","title":"Friendly Precedent","year":2016,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Politics; Construct (python library); Political question; Test (biology); Supreme Court Decisions","score_opus":0.025557573694982412,"score_gpt":0.29324026196327563,"score_spread":0.2676826882682932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7139352817","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011212737,0.0009758846,0.0017475107,0.0322044,0.0018479069,0.00015868054,0.000012728471,0.00006213591,0.951778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9648199,0.0026356536,0.000051838342,0.00026706595,0.0008510098,0.000011123921,9.8787346e-8,0.0000032357204,0.031360053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854594,0.00008010419,0.00021097228,0.00027060343,0.0004744722,0.00041792772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993857,0.00017270744,0.000057395602,0.00009725428,0.00013222138,0.00015472266],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027483806,0.00012264382,0.00015286663,0.000026371341,0.0010405959,0.00004304414,0.00022188833,0.0000818307,0.011685213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019686118,0.000068558926,0.00010765967,0.00021824532,0.00151176,0.00022547918,0.00012637966,0.00003886451,0.0039918963],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001003945,0.000051646508,0.003127124,8.962596e-7,0.000042759184,0.000001937908,0.000850877,4.3696726e-8,0.00013623017,0.9146926,0.011870675,0.0692152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026886736,0.00008984383,0.0065571936,0.00007326237,0.000028108963,5.862953e-7,0.0028841626,2.982685e-7,0.00028313792,0.0921282,0.89745337,0.0002329603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046269977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004352645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9536072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013373818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027616325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7139597567","doi":"","title":"The conceptual origins of contemporary common law constitutionalism : the influence of classical common law jurisprudence on Wilfrid Waluchow’s theory of law","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"theses.fr (ABES)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Common law; Jurisprudence; Common sense; Order (exchange); Philosophy of law; Positive law","score_opus":0.05782579194331849,"score_gpt":0.3235325131863329,"score_spread":0.2657067212430144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7139597567","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47684956,0.0055831834,0.00001667572,0.00713095,0.0010375399,0.0005396614,0.00038851463,0.000032001462,0.5084219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964203,0.00061754556,0.00001612556,0.00219769,0.00057940994,0.000030981395,0.0000056886106,0.000014172809,0.00011808553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951728,0.0015074936,0.0010286969,0.00038729014,0.0013455367,0.0005581939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922339,0.0055109016,0.00076244894,0.0006239403,0.0007187561,0.00015007707],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022929485,0.00037439333,0.0008186814,0.00003318157,0.002239264,0.00004892362,0.0013886159,0.00026404817,0.00011692655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002663045,0.0002362043,0.00030362044,0.00048340397,0.1154822,0.00040728762,0.00036347486,0.0005387562,0.00009232266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035051405,0.00038598222,0.0014729953,0.000027062495,0.00026244545,0.0000058390824,0.010492744,0.00005775731,0.00037518225,0.98580426,0.00030141653,0.00046382306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005498708,0.0004972221,0.002357491,0.0007085162,0.00013463343,0.000005383692,0.010866204,0.000008606222,0.0039226376,0.5261025,0.45456767,0.00027926665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.121508144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029249437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51957077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021174867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069632503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7139629214","doi":"","title":"The influence of the American Supreme Court and the Canadian Supreme Court on the jurisprudence of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal","year":2022,"lang":"pl","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Jagiellonian University Repository (Jagiellonian University)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Tribunal; Constitutional court; Original jurisdiction; Remand (court procedure)","score_opus":0.011198779958637241,"score_gpt":0.19534837796101326,"score_spread":0.184149598002376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7139629214","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27090356,0.00054028333,0.0000074081054,0.06909958,0.001980028,0.002466802,0.0010225745,0.000055226836,0.6539245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9491854,0.0017513742,0.0000054535913,0.0006736796,0.00018515099,0.0000012901769,0.000003740445,0.000018122873,0.048175815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99409145,0.0015993763,0.000596659,0.00082709256,0.0020219535,0.00086348853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99352676,0.0022611283,0.0016536537,0.0012704639,0.00093019515,0.00035780994],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012662839,0.0006572874,0.0008469644,0.00029413667,0.020451501,0.00018721062,0.0047219684,0.0003268893,0.00012277221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000302061,0.00039599047,0.0009098076,0.0013567853,0.05867622,0.00033582715,0.0016539814,0.0019297532,0.000012063027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056906557,0.000053303847,0.018649943,0.000015355994,0.0006762798,0.000107316366,0.002975832,0.00059183955,0.000043969874,0.9746547,0.001576145,0.00008629845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011898603,0.00017427573,0.06855223,0.00036715655,0.0010999787,0.000053474534,0.014793868,0.00003670455,0.00007124262,0.002565536,0.9104153,0.00068037614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3632186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2916831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9720891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018334722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065341303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7139845950","doi":"","title":"<em>The Transformation of the Supreme Court of Canada: An Empirical Examination</em>","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Transformation (genetics); Empirical research; Government (linguistics); Interpretation (philosophy)","score_opus":0.03502382704005529,"score_gpt":0.236990549721148,"score_spread":0.2019667226810927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7139845950","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9857181,0.00007626316,0.00011128004,0.0031546291,0.00008005592,0.0001355414,0.00008291718,0.000007705756,0.010633563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99977595,0.000021346825,0.00004256766,0.000033332268,0.00002153527,1.7459887e-7,0.0000029690818,0.0000015997116,0.00010051834],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887574,0.0002729893,0.000103311984,0.000076365846,0.0005498362,0.00012178526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992963,0.00006305755,0.00012748272,0.00013947955,0.00032442107,0.000049241484],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054449134,0.000055066106,0.00014506672,0.00003985544,0.0018808054,0.0000037137197,0.0004069753,0.000053973807,0.00002520509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000089121015,0.00004624624,0.00008346505,0.00036824675,0.00092708296,0.0002299073,0.000051095805,0.00016550791,9.374587e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008355274,0.00017579843,0.37246227,0.000028149592,0.00014962064,0.0000072489643,0.5651722,0.00025949196,0.000122859,0.0575269,0.0019567362,0.0020551959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024175252,0.000026672562,0.8653619,0.0000155796,0.000046048095,0.0000013503121,0.12719019,0.00003684039,0.00005441512,0.0005629467,0.006398905,0.00006335373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17374302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71869063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54494756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009773936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008531121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7148194910","doi":"","title":"The Last Quarter Century of Empirical Evidence","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The World Bank Open Knowledge Repository (World Bank)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial reform; Quarter (Canadian coin); Transformative learning; Empirical evidence; Politics; Quality (philosophy); Key (lock)","score_opus":0.06457789486140265,"score_gpt":0.37442791698203387,"score_spread":0.30985002212063123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7148194910","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063149715,0.058365233,0.000014686346,0.020343574,0.005252259,0.0008368043,0.0000053839417,0.00012912297,0.90873796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9314109,0.0007153834,0.000021248132,0.00015859936,0.0018665611,0.000101837715,6.914965e-7,0.000015274323,0.06570947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971269,0.0008127651,0.0005381493,0.00043104068,0.00058916357,0.00050201087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99618614,0.0027975577,0.00013191764,0.00047391013,0.00029888007,0.00011157857],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019958792,0.0002285531,0.00032457346,0.00011632998,0.0035642583,0.00075359107,0.0017291108,0.00005220482,0.00018027994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022913147,0.0001292908,0.00023504281,0.0016683271,0.00209745,0.0004471371,0.0006613744,0.00040546822,0.00037986017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013542057,0.00018715813,0.006605509,0.000055728648,0.00033658778,0.000045399578,0.014056827,0.000004843606,0.0002605251,0.58943236,0.3680391,0.020840568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000087111635,0.00003114881,0.00915649,0.00068464817,0.00010788157,0.000005879685,0.0015545617,0.000028841716,0.0002484949,0.0059534274,0.98192734,0.00021420378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018056401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056089856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.925096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025539653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009105924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99773294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7148280088","doi":"10.70675/0556a608z9b5cz4010za3e0za19ca30ba15c","title":"Le recours au mode de preuve scientifique dans le contentieux constitutionnel des droits et libertés : recherche comparée sur les méthodes des juges américain et canadien","year":2017,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Consequentialism; Separation of powers","score_opus":0.26331074485399847,"score_gpt":0.40946702007552793,"score_spread":0.14615627522152946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7148280088","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46251902,0.0015475067,0.016120763,0.0027730966,0.0013034476,0.0010439948,0.00027425133,0.00016556573,0.51425236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9507452,0.0038763084,0.0042954064,0.00019504174,0.00020584842,0.00026116346,0.00031216838,0.00004770955,0.040061124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910084,0.003923545,0.0010509178,0.0013891383,0.0009634218,0.0016645708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99320674,0.002158995,0.00091777515,0.0005430008,0.0024458177,0.0007276803],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00909627,0.00089438335,0.0012463123,0.00032461586,0.01661241,0.0011053511,0.0015969018,0.0011644987,0.00007361755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008689233,0.0009092288,0.000527256,0.00072747475,0.014311938,0.0015769711,0.00020359762,0.001245335,0.00003091599],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012964386,0.00048020086,0.017416907,0.00017629111,0.0004502821,0.00002663391,0.09487934,0.00038741186,0.001192043,0.8770146,0.0007848642,0.0070618284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017139639,0.00016589228,0.09629378,0.004070923,0.00059952197,0.000043142896,0.38148397,0.0007630129,0.004629511,0.49838603,0.009176403,0.0026738516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9342783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9915282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4882262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026990771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030395811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7148628927","doi":"10.70675/956a6814zef3bz44b8zb4d7ze90863fb35f4","title":"Aux origines conceptuelles du constitutionnalisme de common law contemporain : l’influence de la conception classique de la common law sur la théorie juridique de Wilfrid Waluchow","year":2018,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Common law; Order (exchange); Criticism; Intentionality","score_opus":0.012907999353898868,"score_gpt":0.32058155290064994,"score_spread":0.3076735535467511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7148628927","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47445077,0.0018496073,0.0018903535,0.0034124858,0.00076333963,0.0011659918,0.00025200628,0.00040161406,0.5158138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856221,0.005102011,0.0005474335,0.0039165067,0.0017521166,0.00041841512,0.00033259208,0.00007014523,0.002238662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879265,0.006486189,0.0015313806,0.0011955844,0.0011693814,0.0016910052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905024,0.005586735,0.0011158669,0.00047564425,0.0015081562,0.00081115717],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065356563,0.0012607129,0.0016402227,0.00015857167,0.005558144,0.0010872805,0.0012830449,0.0023896096,0.0003990041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010544152,0.0012640266,0.0006368106,0.00071788806,0.03191347,0.0011981871,0.0002002455,0.0016790802,0.00008146626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042967414,0.0004566847,0.027601086,0.00013673658,0.0004213694,0.00019549715,0.01210019,0.00021161945,0.0016855892,0.9497932,0.0066116387,0.00035670315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002082853,0.00027334417,0.0076648984,0.0015340752,0.0005799006,0.00016226376,0.016153386,0.00028130529,0.0033368277,0.35331774,0.6127622,0.0018512295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28820828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20020859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60615057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016015857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017493477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7152002040","doi":"10.70675/e3c8a954z353fz41b9zb86az2591f2555fcc","title":"L'obligation comportementale des juges constitutionnels","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Constitution","score_opus":0.03993840421619321,"score_gpt":0.3499738124907631,"score_spread":0.3100354082745699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7152002040","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16677228,0.010544656,0.000311449,0.00088357984,0.006801537,0.0008385735,0.00006396987,0.00026996012,0.813514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96308655,0.0052269488,0.00014916525,0.00019721613,0.0010350707,0.00011217044,0.0005758199,0.000020327392,0.029596731],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966081,0.00012291924,0.0008439326,0.00076679146,0.001063514,0.0005947595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986716,0.000135752,0.0002702526,0.0001500385,0.00055364805,0.00021873777],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005714524,0.0005064049,0.00054158777,0.0002469911,0.004204298,0.0004434775,0.00033395953,0.00040384362,0.0037531634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012464162,0.00047651396,0.0003631049,0.0010500343,0.0042968905,0.000496132,0.00008776834,0.00037525993,0.0040391064],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029508865,0.00016935577,0.0015307808,0.00020414995,0.00044079035,0.000022860486,0.020375418,0.000016004833,0.00029813393,0.96508044,0.0050756405,0.0067569343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005245409,0.00016091089,0.0076259086,0.0025769554,0.0012052844,0.000010372496,0.2735386,0.00012175265,0.0015541359,0.5243788,0.18668045,0.0016223355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021001745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026487544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79631424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042744676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013842914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W71561623","doi":"","title":"A strategic approach to judicial legitimacy: Supreme Court of Canada and the Marshall Case","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Legitimacy; Political science; Law; Judicial activism; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03383723725556665,"score_gpt":0.2559929142548845,"score_spread":0.22215567699931787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W71561623","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.491708,0.00050396804,0.00031648835,0.006209901,0.0007443586,0.0007913981,0.00008045584,0.00004037474,0.49960503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985661,0.00009626566,0.00048642338,0.00024226385,0.00045380695,0.000049760954,0.0000032139171,0.0000042335596,0.00009791703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878216,0.00009845161,0.00027678785,0.00024291959,0.0003026597,0.000297043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908507,0.00028830068,0.000094109135,0.00015107915,0.0002213248,0.00016011631],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006565731,0.00014002138,0.000284395,0.000045761975,0.0015123935,0.0000630673,0.00022387147,0.000073645446,0.000040678202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003885518,0.00010781582,0.000062342835,0.0002559656,0.003513054,0.00008842848,0.00009006618,0.000202365,0.0000030420213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041240382,0.000044168024,0.00071935443,0.000013436974,0.000048478207,0.00005680486,0.0018844906,0.000077017816,0.00005674767,0.9965205,0.0003596259,0.00017811322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008414347,0.00019372188,0.0068114554,0.00054151326,0.00096410565,0.004536693,0.18098612,0.0014917027,0.00024086612,0.40042084,0.39247236,0.0029262572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7425453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95591736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5960997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006498783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002168043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161795237","doi":"10.82308/2769","title":"The stories we tell: the supreme court of Canada and the constitution","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitutionalism; Constitution; Constitutional theory; Constitutional law; Shadow (psychology); Constitutional right; Jurisprudence; Precedent; State supreme court","score_opus":0.020071468450365636,"score_gpt":0.2854134758840515,"score_spread":0.2653420074336859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161795237","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0068676053,0.009986882,0.0000033679573,0.024280936,0.0024890807,0.00044231507,0.000023337412,0.000011259008,0.95589525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95492953,0.0077009536,0.0000012965918,0.000081383965,0.00027841967,0.000028120992,0.0000074792274,0.0000020543926,0.03697076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989248,0.00011830165,0.00016487633,0.00010463877,0.0005219082,0.0001654811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861056,0.0007299515,0.00021548448,0.0001531692,0.00026423557,0.000026583033],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007889119,0.00010111843,0.0001686992,0.0000071602703,0.0077564004,0.00011406423,0.0003893868,0.00006812817,0.00003131962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007407827,0.000040428087,0.00004905723,0.000048814574,0.0045805653,0.00005180656,0.000023760262,0.0001426615,0.0000011976643],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047581885,0.0000023393377,0.00024211385,0.000004719558,0.00006595195,3.9150217e-7,0.0053379326,5.731725e-7,0.0000011652927,0.9767745,0.015383663,0.0021390626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014465982,0.0000048167344,0.0035867658,0.000046864392,0.0000783194,4.0607205e-7,0.07617139,0.0000013859832,0.000030269952,0.034222953,0.8856215,0.00009066898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96546876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94806194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000068568654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030184232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7164938860","doi":"10.1080/17153379.2023.12558305","title":"The Judicialization of Politics in Pakistan: A Comparative Study of Judicial Restraint and Its Development in India, the Us and Pakistan.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific Affairs","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Judicial restraint; Judicial activism; Judicial reform; Judicial independence","score_opus":0.03956949944153984,"score_gpt":0.3406596733863295,"score_spread":0.30109017394478965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7164938860","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95230585,0.0005654285,0.0000028287325,0.00026985726,0.00008668369,0.0005077788,0.000008894696,0.0000094702855,0.0462432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99955976,0.0003475278,0.0000036460765,0.0000030392355,0.000029829745,0.000030967556,0.0000014507913,0.0000022705844,0.0000215267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988121,0.00021191538,0.00033763205,0.00012752117,0.00031612613,0.00019471522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993601,0.00036843534,0.00010936564,0.000050160685,0.0000835937,0.000028386738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009200136,0.00007267326,0.00018256129,0.000079959726,0.0005571363,0.000019898074,0.000092040034,0.000034511624,0.0000018293817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010325115,0.00004986753,0.000011358796,0.00065939064,0.0007608288,0.00003987351,0.000066562694,0.000076982644,0.0000011212841],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004406212,0.00012028371,0.07918627,0.000008741977,0.00003586806,0.000006318359,0.38722056,0.000030912415,0.000019091025,0.53249866,0.000039291444,0.00078993355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023538445,0.00004125093,0.31946638,0.000028457956,0.0000057555203,1.3118982e-7,0.6713771,0.000019343983,0.000018022582,0.008266043,0.0004915522,0.000050546205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035727357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04330538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5242326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006535097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002174574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9741518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7165390870","doi":"10.61238/ijcl.2021.10.1.03","title":"Proportionality and Burden of Proof: Constitutional Review in India","year":2021,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Indian Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Supreme court; Burden of proof; Deference; Standard of review; Constitutional law; Judicial review; Skepticism","score_opus":0.02619840040560061,"score_gpt":0.3051970979898971,"score_spread":0.27899869758429646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7165390870","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039222974,0.52616256,0.00084153836,0.036852885,0.0042447955,0.001681261,0.0011841977,0.000018222461,0.38979158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9729298,0.024626998,0.00043199165,0.0011232771,0.00078648725,0.000010528415,0.000022423603,0.000004657405,0.00006385773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943861,0.0006090404,0.002313767,0.0003988339,0.0018032519,0.0004890194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99480194,0.000467055,0.0015100943,0.0001590785,0.002670839,0.0003909861],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027154335,0.0003394069,0.0011778327,0.00023171613,0.00076841016,0.00006902573,0.0003543099,0.00026049252,0.001031847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016313157,0.00032767924,0.00039223794,0.0010602765,0.033471975,0.0007894772,0.00016339649,0.00073608605,0.000015186852],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080333586,0.00034939466,0.009598722,0.00058183935,0.00031914952,0.0014202972,0.0007377316,0.00006234384,0.000068675145,0.98547983,0.00041207482,0.0008895804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049261805,0.00045308514,0.024124451,0.04153865,0.0010158186,0.009106806,0.0048972946,0.0000062327854,0.0009825461,0.44650096,0.46495548,0.0014924944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042949323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031413184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9337068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034360922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016500248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W72367525","doi":"","title":"Judicial Review of Executive Policymaking in Advanced Democracies: Beyond Rights Review","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Deference; Adjudication; Political science; Judicial deference; Rulemaking; Judicial review; Competence (human resources); Democracy; Separation of powers; Law and economics; Substantive due process; Duty; Law; Supreme court; Sociology; Constitution; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.012274806385934688,"score_gpt":0.319382867118914,"score_spread":0.3071080607329793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W72367525","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005325658,0.7295904,0.00055046496,0.0138414595,0.0003373921,0.00049447425,0.0000031437473,0.000025007417,0.24983197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44091526,0.5570692,0.00003116195,0.0014927454,0.0003323504,0.000007957576,8.392255e-7,0.0000038173066,0.00014668852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971796,0.00036631117,0.00049828045,0.00016130238,0.0005014942,0.0012929705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914795,0.00013579483,0.00033849984,0.000085253225,0.00022400069,0.00006848814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038709682,0.00012696437,0.00046019623,0.00008267243,0.00062861387,0.000009621195,0.00029276777,0.000048544927,0.000045481098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009456546,0.00010562505,0.00015464984,0.000554094,0.00034550333,0.00019982785,0.00003735664,0.00072534365,0.0000149673],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009986055,0.000028035576,0.000326252,0.00018987921,0.000036527457,0.0000011734136,0.00029762613,7.6461055e-7,0.000008096168,0.9758783,0.0004058185,0.02281756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002364661,0.000092909046,0.00026586562,0.011749813,0.000060618404,0.000020050285,0.0007120198,5.445075e-7,0.0000073561696,0.87009233,0.11660936,0.00015268469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023996965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023762267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43558958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066442747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020730034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9940515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W753213370","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139833912","title":"Bills of Rights in the Common Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Legislation; Common law; Exceptionalism; Fundamental rights; Legislature; Bill of rights; Reservation of rights; Constitutional law; Judicial review; Constitutional review; American exceptionalism; Human rights; Right to property; Politics","score_opus":0.03906299203612987,"score_gpt":0.2478455619613037,"score_spread":0.20878256992517383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W753213370","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00035159622,0.00023672986,0.000001983891,0.00007149874,0.00016352539,0.0002948885,0.00011438191,0.00002122772,0.9987442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08198851,0.000043983935,0.000004254412,0.000099453566,0.00019224136,7.362942e-7,0.000014656788,0.0000033156257,0.91765285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887717,0.00021653675,0.00012204942,0.00016157489,0.00044466957,0.00017802705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993308,0.00016242753,0.00012343194,0.00017000984,0.00015894143,0.00005438357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003623034,0.00012231276,0.00027017182,0.000058574053,0.00046831154,0.000016676951,0.0005916357,0.00017895244,0.0000012545177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010427476,0.000099527,0.000096249496,0.00002534123,0.0018494761,0.000054274504,0.00014100077,0.00023311797,0.0000054537627],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017255361,0.000013003607,0.000006925335,0.0000059882796,0.000025967443,0.00005174252,0.0010530918,4.6427706e-7,3.061103e-7,0.89146173,0.10731693,0.000046577592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017725702,0.000016737127,0.000027238759,0.00007830578,0.0000568265,5.9143696e-7,0.00058645196,2.748482e-7,0.000005099977,0.004006716,0.9949238,0.00012070881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1039136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010704565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88760686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026109687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047193223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90205353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W76925935","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Cases in Ontario, 2008","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03716799095065223,"score_gpt":0.27175120293319277,"score_spread":0.23458321198254053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W76925935","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07928018,0.026498403,0.00614613,0.046274893,0.0046007824,0.0008856652,0.00032146333,0.00014220852,0.8358503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9813999,0.0011225005,0.0010245442,0.0018967522,0.0011298583,0.000043760174,0.00008870453,0.000004413984,0.013289569],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971421,0.00017707291,0.0006885639,0.00054197677,0.0006740796,0.0007762547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983341,0.00050510553,0.00020238015,0.0001630306,0.0005230968,0.00027227987],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008435062,0.0003070566,0.00043938064,0.00022231527,0.0012549063,0.000088855224,0.00031679604,0.00038567878,0.0021261934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011182548,0.0004180748,0.00023090986,0.0009925908,0.006247823,0.00072518503,0.000040913554,0.0006254327,0.00052806345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034724773,0.0005116413,0.02226015,0.000012671181,0.00005142216,0.00045688957,0.0011469373,0.0024829523,0.000013251518,0.9660558,0.002768393,0.0042051394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010350839,0.000076729164,0.092646144,0.0006373881,0.00008708326,0.0008358476,0.00062300486,0.00021033651,0.0000092871005,0.46589813,0.43733135,0.000609614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12979563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.415454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9021197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005295714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006500386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W825752938","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2610","title":"Do Bills of Rights Matter?: An Examination of Court Change, Judicial Ideology, and the Support Structure for Rights in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Ideology; Law; Civil liberties; Political science; Constitutional theory; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Constitutional law; Sociology; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.018394792881188525,"score_gpt":0.2580451245913453,"score_spread":0.2396503317101568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W825752938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88140166,0.00027754394,0.0000274718,0.005220296,0.00064240716,0.00068416947,0.000073877796,0.0000037244276,0.111668855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99936986,0.000030193823,0.00008400375,0.00020336559,0.00028173623,0.000014113183,0.0000028034276,0.0000020811826,0.000011850467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989783,0.00017116866,0.00027485908,0.00009565348,0.00029149593,0.00018850915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927473,0.00015184392,0.00021286559,0.000051757735,0.00024414124,0.00006466693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050018955,0.00007580564,0.00022522733,0.00003751751,0.0006469934,0.000024479794,0.0001571721,0.00005534508,0.00027682752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025012061,0.000045913293,0.00003206057,0.000076034165,0.0008275923,0.00023672472,0.000022124203,0.00010646804,7.001285e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025639933,0.000018818271,0.009463897,0.0000044747767,0.000028442335,0.0000022504057,0.0022171123,0.0000031310797,0.00002556991,0.98675287,0.00041070767,0.0010471164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082585774,0.000053747357,0.1648451,0.000032159394,0.000029337576,0.000012943146,0.0012482771,0.000012801762,0.00009056033,0.8306001,0.0021635687,0.00008556578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99457496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15615274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009178621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002313212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49762157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W834177807","doi":"","title":"Enhancing the Methodology of Formal Constitutional Change in the UK","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Constitution; Political science; Referendum; Constitutional economics; Legislature; Law; Legislation; Politics; Constitutional law; Government (linguistics); Parliamentary sovereignty; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.37957690313645565,"score_gpt":0.4334279216432671,"score_spread":0.053851018506811454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W834177807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9405431,0.0033609294,0.00020582999,0.010052693,0.0006068865,0.0016138877,0.000036695797,0.0000152400735,0.04356471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99844277,0.0010788109,0.000062659004,0.000059707312,0.00022233384,0.000009735868,0.000028043964,0.0000025916122,0.000093370756],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964873,0.0016661482,0.00017543916,0.00016444371,0.0011502672,0.0003563863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99727935,0.0017415045,0.0001453421,0.00018614989,0.0006089109,0.00003872795],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007853329,0.000096610114,0.00023967009,0.00014805565,0.0012799109,0.000014163529,0.0010166944,0.0001438175,0.00010540983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00062844617,0.000059449383,0.00010922466,0.0004891387,0.004700168,0.00017558546,0.00015728503,0.00052026805,0.000025119476],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020710482,0.000047396163,0.0011272057,0.000042730833,0.000066048226,0.000011058902,0.62150735,0.0000029919781,0.000060880095,0.3729979,0.0012137407,0.0027155876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002459502,0.00006300076,0.024064567,0.000182892,0.00004299576,0.0000012361998,0.9051429,0.0000021062274,0.000085990956,0.02768938,0.042381752,0.000097231845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052036475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016778331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3453085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014989502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094002485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W85233168","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1254","title":"Charter Dialogue Revisited: Or \"Much Ado About Metaphors\"","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Phenomenon; Legislature; Supreme court; Legislation; Law; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03852778018458422,"score_gpt":0.31753062719961783,"score_spread":0.27900284701503364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W85233168","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003432365,0.0027507963,0.0010374774,0.002516992,0.0010554944,0.00013892763,0.000013727977,0.000058884732,0.9889953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99302894,0.0014436822,0.00043191877,0.0013632467,0.0027321766,0.0000033165702,0.0000028724032,0.000009350585,0.0009844868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802756,0.00014284138,0.0003840713,0.00018938539,0.00066507503,0.00059105805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990036,0.0001608574,0.00016455098,0.000102435326,0.00026118528,0.00030736835],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019780798,0.00015006462,0.00026736144,0.000066878274,0.0028087217,0.00018730415,0.00030690507,0.000116372015,0.0010735407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021566391,0.00010990441,0.00017389278,0.00027808518,0.0005861752,0.00032179075,0.00005224522,0.0003648473,0.0002513844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006304855,0.000055486853,0.001551843,0.000002874917,0.00008236458,0.00015863347,0.0015591563,6.178357e-7,0.000053208005,0.9855116,0.0027257237,0.008235458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006255638,0.00011035441,0.008050713,0.00014853124,0.00011813881,0.00014720896,0.0043026577,0.0000013923841,0.00013440996,0.22242458,0.7635208,0.00041567686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046323482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36812636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9895966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013267936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016644104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W856109484","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.86160-7","title":"Law and Courts in Authoritarian States","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Rule of law; Jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Legitimation; Discretion; Politics; Accountability; Law and economics; Democracy; Sociology","score_opus":0.037983242850055624,"score_gpt":0.29141572504837426,"score_spread":0.25343248219831865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W856109484","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000023587729,0.005342736,2.6064288e-7,0.00071575743,0.0003429754,0.00024852226,0.00003059277,0.000033409837,0.9932622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017887928,0.00064628234,0.00003997449,0.00036052408,0.0005483491,0.000015255129,0.0000086866785,0.000015115335,0.98047787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892086,0.000035159264,0.00020469812,0.00024013071,0.00036660954,0.0002325298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995367,0.000060699775,0.00007329688,0.00008611473,0.00011132068,0.00013189256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050744775,0.00017237698,0.00030696002,0.00005480779,0.00044097798,0.000047991518,0.000118541175,0.00019985954,0.00007803303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028098211,0.00016404763,0.000046892434,0.000008767359,0.0012084781,0.00004508272,0.000088799534,0.00022949302,0.00006024559],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041369876,0.0000023688146,0.000013621394,0.0000038869302,0.000018408275,0.000021795371,0.0017005741,1.1891043e-7,8.151044e-8,0.7839459,0.00023641309,0.21405269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060279745,0.000009246603,0.000011862786,0.00007563681,0.000013881574,5.2083897e-7,0.00018237643,1.3476662e-7,6.8976156e-8,0.44934604,0.5501888,0.00011118817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009300042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046102896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5499524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013628328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030255647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9713032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W87792680","doi":"10.29173/alr362","title":"The Last Word: Media Coverage of the Supreme Court of Canada, Florian Sauvageau, David Schneiderman and David Taras","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Philosophy; Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0254840135614499,"score_gpt":0.26635559056630537,"score_spread":0.24087157700485545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W87792680","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038158037,0.2837827,0.000002491653,0.09160579,0.002318333,0.0013442845,0.00007145723,0.000013756309,0.5827032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9643213,0.033564977,0.0000046917894,0.0014701483,0.0001545742,0.0000133182475,0.0000025812276,0.000004231493,0.00046418424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867153,0.00019697989,0.00028765248,0.00012016833,0.0005235082,0.0002001663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876946,0.0006016552,0.00015837044,0.0001978099,0.00017034949,0.00010235899],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006850964,0.00009489404,0.00028098372,0.000004750462,0.00059722073,0.00001561036,0.0003377243,0.000030291203,0.000033266155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010673152,0.000053049534,0.00005816878,0.00020887749,0.001026515,0.00008034706,0.00011548645,0.00008554764,0.000004031611],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006361468,0.000016510166,0.006951734,0.00011085259,0.00006555573,0.0000013441994,0.0014173741,0.0000010045896,0.000002884969,0.95579475,0.03225067,0.0033809328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009289343,0.0000069260645,0.0064248308,0.00059383106,0.00006271129,0.0000011710159,0.00023540805,3.528251e-7,0.000009785782,0.0041434015,0.98835635,0.00007235263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88057786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9935448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95610565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005528147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008586903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45933992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W88077178","doi":"","title":"A procedural note on the recent use of Parliament's power to summons","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Summons; Parliament; Power (physics); Economics; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Politics; Physics","score_opus":0.09509350680892942,"score_gpt":0.30807115443462185,"score_spread":0.21297764762569243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W88077178","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10512405,0.066714294,0.000009675203,0.70670915,0.0013121701,0.0052563213,0.000450469,0.00006791261,0.114355974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6925719,0.14684877,0.00009113008,0.15956362,0.00016372667,0.00018544403,0.000012554733,0.000011884487,0.00055098353],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872875,0.00012947428,0.0002448257,0.00018480858,0.0003442385,0.0003679107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991366,0.0001127177,0.000065930406,0.00018225175,0.00011889163,0.00038360385],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002691547,0.00012088012,0.00024048962,0.00004901707,0.0008002252,0.000016176924,0.00023410653,0.000028773815,0.0011275307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000377332,0.00008629359,0.000090698064,0.00046027318,0.0004204322,0.000097033415,0.00002455751,0.000094642055,0.00022648778],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011158505,0.00004445144,0.005760949,0.000039687035,0.000058906015,0.000032599495,0.0018252555,0.0000026835667,0.0000037159955,0.029397193,0.95234364,0.010479775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037241476,0.000041562547,0.0029117242,0.00075405795,0.000023544972,0.000002083059,0.00042511933,1.1494267e-7,0.000007833459,0.00017374614,0.9955095,0.000113467075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46206224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6521893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5874478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042507163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011875535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W89137513","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-14953-0_4","title":"Measuring the Opacity of the ‘Veil of Ignorance’ in Constitutions: Theory, Method, and Some Results","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in public choice","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Opacity; Ignorance; Epistemology; Philosophy; Physics; Optics","score_opus":0.24874882157929934,"score_gpt":0.38322782213890083,"score_spread":0.1344790005596015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W89137513","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00073675625,0.05116063,0.000017129056,0.0063524237,0.00094764854,0.0006341441,0.00014720073,0.000015779548,0.9399883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808208,0.009359597,0.000047717727,0.00013970837,0.00039424415,0.000046685265,0.0000015045398,0.000008499173,0.009181246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978127,0.00040859458,0.00057618844,0.0002848894,0.00066806906,0.0002495505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965902,0.0021370174,0.00040406792,0.0002561312,0.00057407405,0.000038488946],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052142707,0.00019446807,0.0005642443,0.00012199266,0.00060989853,0.00001871179,0.00048287222,0.00014182068,0.0000071608897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009126073,0.00011798982,0.00009984954,0.00025722367,0.008750432,0.00016928765,0.00052892254,0.00039067992,0.0000013171677],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024205092,0.000019174564,0.0011013998,0.000028369255,0.00015219195,0.0000010523021,0.006592591,0.000009321455,9.570554e-7,0.9889972,0.00062427856,0.0024492121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048420695,0.000014290985,0.0020180477,0.00051318714,0.00005012188,0.000001021887,0.009004236,6.139771e-7,0.0000030165415,0.7527445,0.23501256,0.00015420004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005333255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040917683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98008406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025191734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074499415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W91241816","doi":"10.1007/978-94-010-0808-2_10","title":"Forgetting the Act of Forgetting: Raz’s Inaccessible Origin of Legal Reasoning","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Law and philosophy library","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Immediacy; Forgetting; Presupposition; Legal positivism; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Law; Hierarchy; Sociology; Legal realism; Political science; Epistemology; Legal profession; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03527895221167357,"score_gpt":0.26996623950763105,"score_spread":0.23468728729595748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W91241816","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00088450784,0.004177195,0.0000026838259,0.004301262,0.00019867916,0.00019718324,0.000039525705,0.000041573327,0.99015737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96995014,0.0019218498,0.0001534855,0.0009862565,0.0020474007,0.000007166129,0.000019681846,0.000028653874,0.024885371],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885917,0.00003941946,0.0003437751,0.00021303567,0.00034230461,0.00020231026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916005,0.00023315843,0.000355252,0.000139247,0.000048484806,0.00006381025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019999467,0.0001918088,0.00038464234,0.00004881292,0.00075984944,0.00005283096,0.00030332938,0.00017706415,0.00013111116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026920892,0.0001418763,0.00015854446,0.00008147686,0.0011022453,0.0005593117,0.00018575112,0.0002478971,0.0000025663956],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027635466,0.000010186549,0.0014081037,0.000043940894,0.000075365664,0.0000065933928,0.0003356603,3.1586976e-7,0.0000032610142,0.9962936,0.00039783833,0.0013974673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006753127,0.000026090192,0.000052062573,0.00029032037,0.000033481952,0.0000010849818,0.000041049552,5.465713e-7,0.00002951961,0.57489854,0.4244539,0.0001058754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002612506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020628009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9690656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010867795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023507027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58442247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W93368576","doi":"","title":"Through a Colored Looking Glass: A View of Judicial Partition, Family Land Loss, and Rule Setting","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Henan Institute of Science and Technology; Royal Canadian Geographical Society","keywords":"Colored; Partition (number theory); Law; Political science; Mathematics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.025682368487412507,"score_gpt":0.2791600821769393,"score_spread":0.25347771368952676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W93368576","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76037395,0.00043577212,0.000023168153,0.0006817717,0.00022281437,0.0003318925,0.00004336934,0.000031696032,0.23785555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99793446,0.00061793276,0.00037871246,0.00021683745,0.0002133324,0.0000044228345,0.000017893195,0.0000056588665,0.0006107366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978681,0.00041685626,0.00035328782,0.00041547677,0.00060861226,0.0003376578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915963,0.00018853568,0.00017058871,0.00012990036,0.0002437605,0.00010756055],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010047813,0.00017259594,0.00033654482,0.00010796237,0.002902083,0.0002668647,0.0005801574,0.00017062301,0.00012966362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022666971,0.00019736399,0.00007560384,0.00066644116,0.0016097279,0.002136784,0.0002577725,0.00034344394,0.0000186465],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006881933,0.0004099981,0.39106393,0.000049188853,0.00015351987,0.00040162014,0.007479238,0.00051747414,0.0005539201,0.5940773,0.00044520805,0.00416042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024395012,0.000108527245,0.27777523,0.0011333284,0.0001251523,0.000036181173,0.006333004,0.000020017225,0.00020776437,0.027324628,0.6838446,0.00065204856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022373889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005759922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6833994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004580432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010833053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W946449652","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511511035.010","title":"Vox Populi: Populism, the Legislative Process, and the Canadian Constitution","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Populism; Constitution; Legislature; Political science; Process (computing); Law; Computer science; Politics; Operating system","score_opus":0.022448138446521534,"score_gpt":0.22196151231656558,"score_spread":0.19951337387004403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W946449652","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000034535464,0.00085551024,0.000016302556,0.0018211361,0.00026916206,0.00068249874,0.00021389463,0.00004549364,0.99606144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19089667,0.00019972672,0.0000026933053,0.00028915817,0.00032901883,0.0000022374677,0.000019902527,0.0000062916147,0.8082543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882746,0.00010181798,0.00012764361,0.00027996744,0.00037078772,0.0002923063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991795,0.00011532756,0.0001546016,0.0001543595,0.00026387055,0.00013234591],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002836117,0.00021551321,0.00025488628,0.00006773981,0.0056516975,0.00011513432,0.00038274014,0.0002333068,0.0000034731968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004615928,0.00015350572,0.000110427434,0.000018813324,0.0080921445,0.000095960284,0.0001050443,0.00039148776,0.0000071276045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032546985,0.0000015238696,0.000020795043,0.000004529962,0.00007290196,0.000028457936,0.0009592279,0.000001868393,4.9409483e-8,0.9751903,0.023465179,0.0002226262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034667389,0.000006012019,0.000092357695,0.00005535138,0.00019367291,0.0000036091324,0.0005682872,0.0000033416393,5.620737e-7,0.002302941,0.99622154,0.00020567332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83152765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54636055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97288734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036715507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013249667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W953841527","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1048","title":"Book Notes: Mighty Judgment: How the Supreme Court of Canada Runs Your Life, by Philip Slayton","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.033550381472407034,"score_gpt":0.2537775982326635,"score_spread":0.22022721676025647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W953841527","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041864533,0.045662437,0.00020350923,0.10984288,0.0020064942,0.00026536203,0.00011042396,0.0000261373,0.8376963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932881,0.001306828,0.000023054125,0.00295853,0.0012601473,0.000004828882,0.0000021267338,0.0000070933943,0.0011493122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980174,0.00017268026,0.0002362873,0.0001090745,0.0009024691,0.0005621044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989825,0.00017902162,0.00021327697,0.000108335946,0.00018615361,0.00033071282],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008464391,0.00013397532,0.00021294532,0.000015705498,0.0025974964,0.000075325064,0.00037151817,0.000066273904,0.00066027365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020757578,0.00009205454,0.00010558864,0.00011047798,0.0006005448,0.00034728085,0.00005597846,0.0002830636,0.000011683168],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022914533,0.0001082789,0.0063022147,0.0000055103505,0.00017357629,0.0000051872453,0.0024731762,0.000009800811,0.0001854265,0.6441477,0.34630245,0.00026374476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025071326,0.00002174904,0.0015413194,0.000040623512,0.00006837749,0.000012792483,0.00301433,0.0000029916075,0.00035054315,0.0085488595,0.98597413,0.00017355477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87747425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9538326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98910165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021162297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007744644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W95418230","doi":"10.7202/029207ar","title":"Justice and the Grievance Procedure in the Federal Public Service","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Grievance; Adjudication; Legislature; Economic Justice; Political science; Public service; Service (business); Law; Criminology; Business; Psychology","score_opus":0.058720205157405954,"score_gpt":0.3000882793497998,"score_spread":0.24136807419239387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W95418230","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13860363,0.0027237968,0.000049007584,0.6176657,0.00009449042,0.00037938685,0.0000037136226,0.000030234742,0.24045002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99615604,0.0003634472,0.00003290051,0.0023156079,0.00040893795,0.0000338367,0.0000014020181,0.000001691152,0.0006861648],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992815,0.00015414646,0.00011552947,0.00009261879,0.00020739593,0.00014878536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992871,0.00051531335,0.0000386458,0.0000619071,0.00007381633,0.000023203545],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059044466,0.00005338159,0.00006142653,0.00002351522,0.0021040859,0.00010713822,0.00016134288,0.00008087455,0.000031329575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006643351,0.000030595864,0.000015634188,0.0005793479,0.0005564979,0.00020391509,0.000030427642,0.00025517526,0.000032910764],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065960353,0.000020091815,0.0052984236,5.697004e-7,0.000007357688,3.7657435e-7,0.01424008,0.000097882235,2.1432705e-7,0.9723459,0.0039009543,0.0040815417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000555561,0.0000050398976,0.020289931,0.000020967125,0.000045141653,0.0000037751902,0.06703377,0.00021412756,8.105461e-7,0.024809347,0.8869174,0.00010410988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016314951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0187066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9475366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036773647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025818945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99919945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W96210955","doi":"","title":"New Constitutional Ideas: Can New Parliamentary Models Resist Judicial Dominance When Interpreting Rights?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Judicial review; Legitimacy; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Constitutionalism; Law; Human rights; Constitutional theory; Legislature; International human rights law; Politics; Parliamentary sovereignty; Legislation; Sociology; Democracy; Parliament","score_opus":0.03310356322175908,"score_gpt":0.30227748066509436,"score_spread":0.2691739174433353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W96210955","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005416307,0.2547981,0.008721633,0.059037484,0.0010659676,0.0012268407,0.000051430623,0.00021937453,0.6743375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9079146,0.05058314,0.007894212,0.029078918,0.0028640975,0.000049669696,0.000035143355,0.000017921637,0.001562306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807316,0.00011455155,0.00046757623,0.00035753284,0.00057135447,0.00041584257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991962,0.00008515305,0.0001703707,0.00016917469,0.00010324201,0.00027588685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004954318,0.00020914906,0.0004653773,0.000024550627,0.0011864515,0.00006422211,0.00037272394,0.000071838775,0.0005506761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001310701,0.00018300426,0.00018272224,0.00023167329,0.0017211181,0.00033720367,0.00010414554,0.00017825657,0.0002272006],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011586799,0.000019631254,0.000053341682,0.000041405405,0.000038162496,0.000014148018,0.00037608366,0.000025173005,9.0068824e-7,0.971908,0.023692958,0.003818658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002197974,0.000012565359,0.000023203678,0.0031438791,0.00006865953,0.0000037314267,0.000034793113,3.830879e-7,0.000008059468,0.5356722,0.4606453,0.00016745458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3741628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12877841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90737295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041434486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017737133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9125346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W97316950","doi":"","title":"Factbound and Splitless: Certiorari and Indian Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Certiorari; Supreme court; Law; Political science; State (computer science); Sociology; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.028295190105892237,"score_gpt":0.29602145258625717,"score_spread":0.2677262624803649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W97316950","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25631556,0.0006258502,0.000013697557,0.008081321,0.00005806676,0.000056123114,0.0000016862216,0.0000306838,0.734817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978088,0.00021058244,0.000056370598,0.0013385707,0.000113950024,7.6496474e-7,3.2359293e-7,5.646096e-7,0.00047004098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99967927,0.000012789816,0.000042916086,0.000077965844,0.00008775063,0.00009930757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99987864,0.000020376934,0.000009027591,0.000020143714,0.000016502736,0.00005528196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007404307,0.000034256933,0.00005222307,0.000010370979,0.0006396861,0.00006437407,0.00002650452,0.000027202008,0.00006157638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014297846,0.000027902584,0.000007647029,0.000044004475,0.00048376265,0.00010277351,0.000012234701,0.00002691384,0.000011775511],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001420831,0.000006257186,0.0025607215,3.833765e-7,0.0000028006702,0.0000015994443,0.0018404992,1.7804313e-8,0.000010802269,0.98644376,0.0002457546,0.008886003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015812377,0.000040186464,0.13088268,0.000009117042,0.00000881269,0.0000019024512,0.006855494,5.518171e-7,0.00003061582,0.5057942,0.35607633,0.00014191601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01368315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014710135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7414933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010214734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025431791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9928848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W97340422","doi":"10.1007/978-0-387-89672-4_4","title":"Party Rhetoric and Practice: A Normative Perspective from Political Science","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in public choice","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Rhetoric; Perspective (graphical); Politics; Epistemology; Political rhetoric; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Computer science; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.10741115002812072,"score_gpt":0.40758358555977037,"score_spread":0.30017243553164963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W97340422","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000105266234,0.014472076,0.0000027491355,0.03406869,0.00073174154,0.00029134398,0.000049278828,0.000053796906,0.95022506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92691,0.017001592,0.0003126985,0.0032585112,0.0036188804,0.000062288826,0.000006904431,0.00002190301,0.048807234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971643,0.00011127481,0.00031239088,0.00061918364,0.0010193485,0.0007734647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953405,0.0025316018,0.00019820652,0.00016299699,0.0015112617,0.0002554074],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013442296,0.0002815116,0.0005037869,0.00024294201,0.0017767809,0.00015436449,0.00035158126,0.0001666741,0.0000578195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017800223,0.0002537939,0.000068254834,0.00033025924,0.010398101,0.0008554169,0.00043312894,0.0004992631,0.000041209845],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010118615,0.00003102395,0.00013658227,0.0000029834698,0.00014453882,0.000015359765,0.015695676,3.958643e-8,2.2210891e-7,0.98069346,0.0014310392,0.0018389557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014306995,0.000031856463,0.0015996437,0.00008438508,0.00004948141,0.000002130068,0.04462665,2.7897107e-7,1.3307398e-7,0.499051,0.45418772,0.00022363936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015129079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015904741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9268047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025690428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014328301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W992228728","doi":"10.1515/9781773855714-018","title":"16 Ethical Decision Making: An Idea Whose Time Had Come","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Obstacle; Polycentricity; Key (lock); Political science; Decision maker; Judicial opinion; Process (computing); Rationality; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Management science; Computer science; Economics; Management; Computer security; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.036538333185074115,"score_gpt":0.2743789187304727,"score_spread":0.2378405855453986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W992228728","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000069706126,0.0006706292,0.00038929243,0.00011475458,0.0002624964,0.0002188337,0.000053756812,0.00011242768,0.9981081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011598306,0.00028612796,0.00033817758,0.00019815279,0.00023912694,2.596924e-7,0.000015711674,0.000018291797,0.9873058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985321,0.000054142733,0.0001698882,0.00035578813,0.00067912496,0.00020895904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991577,0.00021382039,0.00011607509,0.00018771634,0.00019067408,0.00013397304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028668737,0.00019651817,0.00037188365,0.00010854631,0.0006651421,0.000037225418,0.00047116374,0.0006828538,0.0004525168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028549355,0.00021704748,0.00021821479,0.000011806723,0.0018675202,0.00006810502,0.0003831661,0.00065382064,0.00014954468],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103719554,0.000009631629,0.0000023611979,0.000015459531,0.0001010788,0.000120641555,0.0014836395,8.598187e-7,0.0000033456104,0.97909486,0.0021574283,0.016906977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010619922,0.000042579875,0.000017851367,0.00039046595,0.00014042613,0.0000012902899,0.000115883384,0.000016022066,0.0000013409137,0.23010062,0.768868,0.00019930524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066163675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061481106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7667106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017537018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000271988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}